310607_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental dual

Division of Soil.and=Water Consei vation -Operation=Review
[J Division of Soil and Water Conse► yation _Compliance Inspection
MDi"vision of Water Quality. :;Compliance Iuspee4on
Other Ag. y p' i^atsoiQ'ReLl
ievtew <.,
enc O e _ .
® Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number �
Date of Inspection z Z
Time of Inspection 0rp 124 hr. (hh:mm)
[a Permitted XCertified 0 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered 113 Not Operati7o—nall Date Last Operated:
Farm Name � ....2��.v ... 14-- I!'i County:....... //_y/:/�'Y....................... �ll�........... 11 IS...............................
Owner Name. ._........�.ti ,ert......:.�a�l........................................................... Phone No:......... ..`.:.�'`.T..............
Facility Contact: .................................................. I�y.
............................ Title:.........................
'`'Tailing Address: ......���f. ,(�JG._...fL�� �/� I '0"...
Onsite Representative: .................................... ................................
Certified Operator: ...... LEI.I TS -- ..... A) ... ... �,ta:!�.1.�? .......................
Phone No:
......... /".�/V.A.;.rS...�i .............M..;!w
sdljjIntegrator .......................... i&S
Operator Certification Number:... 16937..............
i'
Latitude un� =' U� Longitude 0 ° 69
Design Current ' Design Current Current Design,
Swine r.0apaciPa
Population Pou
CattleCa ay
,.
Capacity Population - -
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish
[j
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
_._ .... _...W
_
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Ca 4dt
:-
❑ Gilts
-.
Total: SSLW
Z �p
❑Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse.impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): C?.................. ................................... ....... ............................. ................................... ...................................
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
J
❑ Yes 0 No
Structure b
❑ Yes 'k No
Continued on back
3/23/99

Facility Number:J — Date of I nspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes ❑ No
{If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ}
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [:]No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenaricelimprovement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
❑ No
12.
Crop type
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
D- N,tJ-yi6laticjris:oi- delicienet. es -were noted• dialing this. ;vis. it:-Y:oit will-r'eeeiye yid futftr
corresp6iidenke. about. this visit..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: .
�omments (refer to question #) Explain any YES answers andlor'any recommendations:or any other coatments = a
Jse drawings of facility -to better eXplam sttuatidiis (use addittonal`pages as -necessary) .
x - _- x
6�e_ 1,/ &)g , i <
bujq 6� 91?) 73 3 --§003 To IVIC-_ ReA)®y/
A724M - R€671 S"Mlerl0 1IS1r.
/
Reviewer/Inspector Name 17
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
�i?15
Date: / L/ 2-
3/23/99

Facility Number: Date of Inspection L
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30_ Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
r [.--A44itional'Conments orrawn
4 -e69A4- / S,
3/23/99

'IW
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
em" Division of Water Quality
Routine O Cum faint O Follow-u of DW ins ection O Follow-u of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection w
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Q RegisteredCertified F Applied for Permit 0 Permitted Not O erational Date Last Operated: ka
.....................
Farm Name:... .. ... ............................................County:........ t'` ...........................
'�
Owner Name:__ ......... �...... � �� �............................ Phone No: _ .....'��..... ............{:...........�....................
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address* ...........................................
Ousite Representative:..P..Vj. �e'.-
Certified Operator, .....................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude �• �' �"
Design Cu
Sivme Capacif y,.Pop
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
G
6
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Title: ................................................................ Phone No:...
......................................................................................................................................... ..
.................................. I................... Integrator:.... - .....
.................................:.......I............ Operator Certification Number-,..................
Longitude �• �' �"
Design Current
Poultry Capacity�Population Cattl
.......
❑ Layer I I D:
❑ Non -Layer I❑ Ni
❑ Other
Total Design Cal
Total S
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ONo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IgNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ( No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?RA
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Wo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes D9 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes P(No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonstholding ponds) require ❑ Yes P(No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes N No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes &No
7/25/97

• Facility Number: '• j — (�
r�r
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
tANo
Structures (Laeoon$j oldinQ Ponds,Flush Pits,, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
a
❑ Yes
f �No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): _!..................................... ................................... ............ _......................
.................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
gNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
I'd No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
9 Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
C�No
Waste_ Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
EXNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
`
15.
Crop type ........�,P..�... a�..�... Y. U``o�............................................................ ...............................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
RNo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Uf No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
01 No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[XNo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
C�No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
5�No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
21 No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23_
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
EqNo
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
No
' NoAo'ia'tions,or' deFiciencies.were noted-iiuring this:visit.; You;wiH i-ecei've.no.ftirttier_::
:•correSpQndenceabouiti�is:visit:•:•;�:•::-�•. . ......,...� :_�...::�--.•.•. � : ,-..... .�
Oe-
3 '� � G�w� � �l � Caves t r-2� ��� Y�� ✓[ (
7/25/97

a
m Division of Soil and Water Conservation p Other Agency
p Division of Water Quality
19 Routine p Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up o review p Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:min}
0 Registered 13 Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted IM Not Operat►ona Date Last Operated: 11/1/97
Farm Name: larry.jDayis.Farm........................................................... ............................. County: Duplin WIRO
OwnerName:"r4...................................... Dayas...................--...................................... Phone No: 9.19=56S.-A.446 ..........................................................
FacilityContact: JAr4.Davis .....................................................Title: Owner.................... ...... Phone No: ...........................................................................
Mailing Address: 338j..KC.Hwy..1.11..&.903.N............................................................ Alberlson..N.0 ....................................................... 285011..............
Onsite Representative:Jn.Amm.Barxett.......................................................................... Integrator:Marphy..Faroily.Farms......................................
Certified Operator: Laxxy..W .............................. Daxis .................................................. Operator Certification Number:18032.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©.®6 ©44 Longitude ©0 ®6 ®11
esign urren esigm urren-....Design,-. Current
CapacityPopulation Poultry , Capacity Population ` Cattle Capacity _Population
to ee erer
ME]ean
to m�sw
to ean
Farrow to Fee er
p Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? []Yes []No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? []Yes p No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes p No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ©No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes p No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes p No
7/25/97

aci ity Number: 31 _607
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Pond Flush Pits, etc.)
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier----------------#1................ -.
Freeboard (ft): 1.9 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
[]Yes
❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
[]Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type......................................................................................--............................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for Iand application?
❑ Yes
p No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
D No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
p No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
❑ No
R .. o -violations.or �crenc>tes were mote - xoig t I<s visit:. You willxereive no further
es�io��e�ely•v�s��: ; ' - - - - ' ::: • : • : • : • : • . • . • : • : • : • : • . • . • .. ..... ....
acility was depopulated 1 I/l/97. At this time Mr. Davis has no plans to restock facility.
This visit serves as confirmation that there are no animals on site. Complete the attached request for removal form to notify
GDWQ that facility is no longer in operation. Submit form to NCDWQ as directed.
Recommend obtaining and implementing a lagoon closure plan to permanently abandon the waste structure. if closure is not
possible then a long term management plan should be developed to manage lagoon level so as to prevent any potential discharge.
Contact the Duplin Soil & Water District Office or any Technical Specialist for assistance in obtaining either an approved closure
plan or a long term management plan.
Please note that should you decide to reopen facility a certified animal waste management plan must be in place and implemented
prior to restocking the facility. Your Technical Specialist can assist you in meeting the guidelines to obtain such a plan as n87 _
Reviewer/Inspector Name `Scott ones _ =� ....
P7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

ij
Yacility umber: 31_607 Date of Inspection
''Additional°Cothiiieiits�andlor�D�wing§� _
dditionally the height of the rear dike wall appears to be greater than 15 ft. high. This height requires annual inspection/review by .
e North Carolina Division of land Resources - Dam Safety Group. Consult with your Technical Specialist proper notification
protocol of your waste lagoon to this agency. Trees on the dike wails should not be removed until after consulting both your
Technical Specialist and the Division of Land Resources.
NOTE: In a phone conversation with Mr. Davis on 12/11/97, it was disclosed that Mr. Davis had been working with the Duplin Soil
Water Office to develop a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in order to keep facility operational. Mr. Davis indicated
at he was planning to initiate work on the lagoon this week to meet certification requirements. Mr. Davis will follow up with the
Division of Land Resources in the Wilmington Regional Office to determine if any additional requirements are necessary regarding
e waste lagoon.
H

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
_® Division of Water Quality
® Routine O Cont taint 0 Foll(iw-u of 1)Ny ins cction O Follow-u of.DSWC review° O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number 3
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Registered [3 Certified © Applied for Permit 0 Permitted JimNot O erational Date Last Operated:--„`�... /J.-T.,
Farm Nartte:...� .a .,r.�r.o }.....I�a.nu:.i..i ..... F-c..,c..�..........................................I........ County:.... .v. ..� x.................................... .1..
Owner Name: ................_�.&.x.e..I............
..D.tt.ai..1..r._........................................... Phone No:.... S41... ..... �..`�..'�..�................ I........................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................. Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address:...��..8..�.......b�.rr....� �Ns�.............q.Q...3..t l...... A S..1a_e,,y- ax'-..,.......E.G..r.................... ..�,�..4.t�..
Onsite Representative:..s ... .xtit•x�i�"......................................... Integraton..."..u.irT..........................................................
......
P
Certified O erator;......... ......................................... ................ ......... ......... I ...... I ........ ..... Operator Certif cation Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
.Q.K.....�.�.>r ..s.::.�l..�......c� ........ �a�.a.. ........�.1.......`�.D..�..... ....�..� ..rt, �s.%.,lJ�C►..aL.... ... ..... ....... .... �.x..�s..� ... �
....... ....... i..� ...........ems a r.�..✓�... sr,�.�.1� ............. ....--- ..... . .
Latitude ' ° 4° . Longitude =0.=1 11
i Design F Current I}esign Currents ' Design Current .
$, s
Swrne Capacsfy Population{ ' Poultry `. Capactty Populatt©n Cattle Capacity ;Population .!
. x «,; a.
❑ Wean to Feeder LayerEl ❑ Dairy
EEIry
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑Non -Layer ❑Non Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Other Mrs
❑ Farrow to Feeder
F
u
❑ Farrow to Finish
Tatai Destgn Capacity
❑ Gilts'
Total �SLW
[IBoarsh
9
N_
JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
« - * -a
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System --�.
-•A- �`?
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DV1'Q)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonstholding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25197
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes [RNo
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes E$ No
❑ Yes ®.No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes IS No
❑ Yes VRNo
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes RNo
Continued on back

Facility Number: 3
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2
Identifier: ........[.:...Z.,Cw ............ .............................
Freeboard (ft):....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 3 Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type e!� .r..yati usl�,........................
RYes ❑ No
❑ Yes KNo
Structure 5 Structure 6
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18, Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certiled or Permitted Facilities Onl •
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0-No.violitions-or. deficiencies.rvere-notedduring' this, visit.-You'rvill receiv`no-ftirther-;
correspondence: atiout this.visit:-
❑ Yes 2 No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [ffNo
O Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ®.No
o-s z - _ z x--"-¢ m, �,r s �-z '-r -,- ,iF�- t�:-e 7 ro - - - s _ a <
Comments (refer tolquestron #) ^ Expiaitt any 'ES answers and/or any-reconinj t o or any other cbntenenls;
Usaxdraw�ngs of facthty to better explain srtuahons (use addtttonal pages as:necessary}Rw
"
x a 22s ::.fir--' . --i':$ ,;°8 a x� .^ .. f :. ..7a� , .:�;'. ?a "'n s. ` ..a��
Tit �;1� is tv ve.+.4a,r.'tna�.o�a,.0.{�DKn�, 1a�oDvi sl.-OVA 1ae. o,.. C.i�lt� clpj,tj A6
O V b tl r o- VT V-Z R +M s�
Ii. z. Tre.tC 0,, 11 00,1► W lI r.w� to t4a. �r�->.a w-ed. PIe-oXc caa.
t Lv tve-£ rie 1� �* L� �� t fi-��r
t-Qr ..,,mob V a � . � d- � s ( i � �n � � t• w 4 � o % S e.r _
t`VLa E 0.0 r l D D %n w x t l 1 1. a S v­Q V e- A 3 —vL 1 i " v4,ir- S 4
b e e s f-a b l � s t. P I S 9 9 ✓� 4! i' O i d s b �2 Gr l ti-q D O .� �,J e. fi t.
�ft;CI-- Of V9LVri E p-QM i� QCi 2 tr► VS�' ���-3
2. �o Seca el W aVal.c. at- (::W.' �+�� e� i,.sC�e c tiDr. 1%eI reurq
u s f b f_ �-e. P o- s;} t.
A N t k-i tu- 4 D 4-t r, W i l t la R S e.w� * o-r ✓4e t V-0- V ,�j a .1 aq ra P+ i w 7/25/97
tAVA-i ,tee. r o .{ tti..c.,In
xn rx s
Reviewer/Inspector Fame -f
Reviewer/Inspector Signature JeDate: y + I
LIL

•
•
•
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.'j
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: —3
Time:'.
Farm Name/Owner: ' 51re -,77,
Mailing,
County:
Integratc
On Site l
Physical
Type of Operation: Swine tZ - Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Nun ACE b DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: �� w ' 312 Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: ­2 Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes oro Was any erosion observed? Yes or To
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: '
Does the facility meet SCS mum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Cpr No
/"/7C -,j'GJ 100 Feet from Wells? es or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o�N
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state'by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste -management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray. irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes o No
Additional Comments:
1-6 /V
Inspector Name Signature
,' .. cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.