310596_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

y
Type of Visit Q� Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit/ VRoutine O Complaint 0 Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Facility Number
Permitted [3 Certif/iedd 13Conditionally Certified
�D�Registered
/Farm Name: f-Y/��d / / 172ZxLy / / '/i�
Owner [tame:
Mailing Address:
Time:
Date Last Operated
Above Threshold: _
County:
Phone No:
Facility Contact: Tit Phone No:
Onsite Representative: o�P1PzS E ry Integrator: A&'OitAr
1
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
[swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 0& " Longitude • ` 0�
Feeder to Finish baother
Non-Layer L l I [I Non -
Farrow to WeanFarrow to Feeder
Farrow to Fil ILI _ Tntal�npslnn fianAri
Boars
No Liquid Waste M
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gat/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes JZNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes El No
❑ Yes �J No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes XNo
Structure 6
Identifier:
12 if
Freeboard (inches): 622
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 151 _ Date of Inspection p
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
❑ Yes
jrnNo
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
>ANo
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Aunlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Exc sive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
El Yes
VNo
12. Crop type (j
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those dgignated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VNo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
El Yes
,_,/
No
18. Does the facility fail to have at] components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
f
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
PNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
A
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
PNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
["No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
XNo
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments {refer.to quest,on:#) Explain any YES answers and%or :any recommendations ©r any other comeiient`s
Use drawings of facility to better explain stiiu o; s. use additional pages as'neeessary) ,' Field Copy ❑Final Notes :
.. k' "'gym:- �»
Q46# ���5 v 4E Fz� pvED d�Ro/1') L}}G�i J,
0KF r1 /'FOSeR! /16,667 A9ePA.-?R'60,
A14;W
Reviewer/Inspector Name'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
O5103101 f Continued

. . k
Facility Number: 51 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Additional'Comments4ndlor Drawitigs:
�5 �FrF SL/
m�
61771 , DIVE,APO
i
��oeo� �i�'IO�E�� �/�✓� D.o�e��'
4
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �P No
El Yes, VNo
❑ Yes /❑ No
05103101

Type of Visit oCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit flrRoutine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other I ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number c Date of Visit:
Permitted 0 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered
Farm Name: �4 d rr,"M"r, ��1 r0. rmir
Owner Name: ..............Ar"1 Pit �k # SD............................................................
$ 22- 01 Time: 130 3
Q Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County: 7Dy Joe,
PhoneNo: .......................................................
Facility Contact: ............................................................................... Title:............................................ Phone No:
.......................................................................
Mailing Address: ......................................
OnsiteRepresentative: _( C.k�l �vD��,I�D--Gk #rdt,JK::*ht113arator:,MUr��� ------------ _----- ------ ,).
Certified Operator: ................... . .............................. ........................................... Operator Certification Number:
.................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 G4 Longitude • 6 44
;Design :.
Current :: Design
-'
Current Desrgni ' .'Current
Swlne .. 'Ca aci
-. _
Po elation .. Poultry _ ;. Ca as
-
Po ulation - " Cattle. Ca oaei :., Po elation
>:
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Layer
❑ Dairy
=
Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
10 Non -Dairy
1
"
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑Farrow to Finish
Total Design ,#pacify
Gilts
Boars
Total ssm
Number;of i.agooas . .
Iioldirig Pads 1 Solid Traps__
Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area
.- ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field .❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Spray Field Area I
x
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ........................................................................ ........................
Freeboard (inches): 30
5100
❑ Yes J•No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes JZNo
h /,q
❑ Yes JO No
❑ Yes 16 No
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes R No
Structure 6
Continued on hack

Faci!<ity Number: 31 — 5% Date of Inspection 8 2z D1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ANo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes J;ffNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes oNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes J2 No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ONo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 8No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload Oyes ❑ No
12. Crop type <- 16- �"yt I k
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ETNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?ayes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [1No
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ YesXNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes omo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) )'Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ONo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 1'No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes f f No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes J'No
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes LTNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ONo
' t'�Io-Yiolaiitjris:e� dtrfic�eoct�5 w�ro noted- �g 'visitt • :Y:oo wi��-�ee�iYe �ti �n�h�; • . .
coiris oridence: about this visit:
use pr!itwungsWoutacmxy uo.ueuer expinin7siumutons. Luse aumuonw;paggs as p
i9• lxgve 6ee►1 P,�Q ;.n +I%c c4i.1cv1a4.oiAs ov►-4ile jrr1,ja4t'c,M A�
r►-Br-0Ile" - T'ke otpe rc,4,o. - inch ac4cd - k x+ ke had C11tvq yj �ie¢rt -j,oict -tkki
w hen d 1 ✓ �d 11 r9 b � �icc ; -vxA -Fe wt v 14 '101 4ke nv m er'0,1or 4 e dec;n'tq% ,
.since 4105,4 Or -the sPrR.yy 2ayles 6sPhdse4) �/-e less hah ortc c�Gr�e ,-tie
Alculc14 t ar% ,n i s vnde rs4ztkd i res v 1+eot ;,1 ^to- n uNte f o vs' e,rr o rs orb -eke
Ir,eOr4 1 on rig CIO/Vtt wti"4k i;�-tyee( a roI'm i't 4►%e-E`o11ow;� n42oloverc�0�l��rlo�
o.F fAN- Also, 4hQ Gitrre►\]• LeAn co -of record% nevi 46 to prooeel� del cvlaled�
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: S D 1 5100

Facility Number: 3 —$�� Date of inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes,8'No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes_)ZNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes O'No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes )21�No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes VNO
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes /❑ No
Additional Comments and/or ravings:_-
rq, 1-on4) immed i&,4Pt' 4e c4e,-er-4 4t esa .5aw,e 4y a errors q.1d
N a}r 11ed deed be nezi41, -Feed( ncee(s v �e c4cgvie-o y 1,id -Feo fte IYO-
��. Awe a6je acres !fie-��r iyw�i�j'1 needs 4o be otene -For 41ge Aac��/,4
i•K►�¢d �4-�lY. Rerr�--sen4,14,,.rs 0-f 4ke 4c'a.c:1)4 ques}ianed tvhe4,,r
4bie a ceec% a oh T�C ir`� iLlet.f 1'eLn t/LGBrA-S mR Gdr�ec l�ep en-�q�i'rQ!
aliso i+t�[� LaJ[�e� -�t-►R� : �-t {fr6✓er► e-rjTS 41e—Anf ; I� i ���a 5 S-�ew+ +�4 (iE
r+1 e a w4r�bje zkGees done Ne'l �oe fee GVrre&jj .5 S-�eM. a *'►� - It � S s .(4d b� 7wWrle o� +-i•f d r �x�ed
�n 6a64L, � rejd l' cq4 -c>;i aPLet 46,- eecond keel when Otte
5 S-�c- �5 �� ro d I � a naaN t..�� able cLc.�t
SkotOA 6e, cto ie Fps tW new s -ekrh anA &e4l -Field of
and r�car`d k�� Sho�,r� 6e do e accord •n 1 PI°
� gy
Il . D v 6'-4tjP/ j '-C44 i e+i of FAN has a 66Vr044 on -4hP 7-0 op-Z.,00�
All of -OiF Aol (owi '" aP/ 1"'`� toh ct "r5 q" A 11,0W&4 J 5 Its rkl qc re
Ot, i+J4,,,4 -,r,—, 'f e wa0a V }+Cr' Z4'>1"ioh (14rl .7i►e -Fe ' I
SLtcy•vS -X61 ea KI ailO/;e-�i A-Ld -ftte q ♦.oL.,t� ove'��P%%i�c .
-Saw AW%oLtftf � IiEft lbs PAIL) acre) 1 16sPAS
�ntti/j� QV'e�l 2-1O 4Cr'
I 1 49
35
Z 2 I Z7 S Z
Z 3 1 3 q __---- S
0.9
2 t I 21
z 7 1 ZZ '{ 7
Z g r?� 96
41
Z. a l?g 4 3. q
Z tl 137.Q t-2• l
Z 12- q3.3 J$.3
3 2 2$:5 Z l0
51003 3 Z62
3 4 189
3 S Z7L-. 09

Lagoon Dike Inspection Report
Name of Farm/Facility Q C.l
Location of Farm/Facility
Owner's Name, Address 1_�14WDk4o
and Telephone Number
Date of Inspection Names of Inspectors {Z.�
Structural Height, Feet _ Freeboard, Feet
Lagoon Surface Area, Acres Top Width, Feet
Upstream S lope,xH: IV 2 l Downstream Slope, xH: I V 3,
Embankment Sliding? Yes /No
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
Seepage? /es No la (2012 1A-t S • 'o
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
Erosion? Yes ---No
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
Condition of
Vegetative Cover
(Grass, Trees)
Did Dike Overtop?
Yes No If Yes, Depth of Overtopping, Feet
Follow -Up Inspection Needed? Yes ,---No
Engineering Study Needed? Yes /No
Is Dam Jurisdictional to the Dam Safety Law of 1967? Yes No
Other Comments

{Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation:
© Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other 0 Denied Access
Facility Number hate of visit: ® Printed on: 7/21/2000
Q Nut O erational Q Below Threshold
[Permitted (3 Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ��U SUS (�—►—ram County: ...f1 ..(.......`...................................................
.................................................................................................................... \�
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No:....................................................................
Facility Contact: .........................
Title: ................................................................ Phone No:
_Mailing Address: ......................................................................................................
Onsite Representative: ���'! 45 ��...f `\ C Kll- 1)......
Certified Operator: ................................................... ...........
Location of Farni:
....... Integrator:.....
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �` �" Longitude �• �� ��°
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder Zoo ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Law -on Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste ;Management System
Discharges & Stream ImRac
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance rnan-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If disc.han!e is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin?
& Does discharge bypass a lagoon systeni7 (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 2No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes tKNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes allo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:..................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 39L
5100 Continued on back

Facility Number: 31 — Date of Inspection F� Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes b�No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure'plan? ❑ Yes tKNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes WNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes 14 No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes VNo
Waste Anolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 9No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ,qNo
12. Crop type / W",k
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes b&o
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes bdNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21- Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NO i6lati6tis:0r- deficiencies were poled dkirig this:visit: • ." WWl f.eceive i further
correspondence'abo'ut�thisvisit. :::::::•:-:•:•:--:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:-:•:•:•:•:•:-:•:•:•:•:•:-:-:•:-:
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any. other comments.
Use drawings
of facility to beater explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ( (i
❑ Yes ❑ No
WYes ❑ No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes NoNo
❑ Yes �<No
❑ Yes •(No
Cl Yes DKNo
❑ Yes tgNo
❑ Yes '�EfNo
❑ Yes J'No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes NfNo
Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: ( t— N -Qjo 5100

r-;�
Atiiity Number: 3 — Date of Iiuspection p0 Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge Wor below
❑ Yes
O(No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i_e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
No
30,
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
qNo
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
RNo
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
Q<No
-Additional:Comiments:and/orDrawings:
l�i `l cal `ate, al�J f7 V ,
5100

Division of Soil and=Water`.Consei atioa =`Operation=Review =`
0 Division of! oiland Water`Conservation ,:Compiiance:liispectioiu g r;
= Division of Waier Qualify : Cotnptianee Inspection
Olher Agency Operation°Review
-x
lQ Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number 3t ja Date of Inspection FI Z1-2-1-qG
Time of Inspection Z J 5 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Permitted © Certified Cj Conditionally Certified [3 Registered [3 Not Operational Date Last Operated: „.
Farm Name: M115 a County: .... l
Owner Name :............ a.t-ne l d 14 i S a Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .................................---.......................................... Title:............................................................... ` Phone No:..................................................
MailingAddress:.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative: i:ctiin L.�JcS{ay. ""� ��Ss Integrator:...ufpt�r.,,.l.."`,�rVi„f.....
1.......................................................
Certified Operator: 7 1. h .... . ► z .f, L.................... Operator Certification Number:.,,22 S 4 0
Location of Farm:
t............................................................--..........--- •......--- ---- ----- ..-...-...-.........................................--- •......-............................................ ....._...........-....
Latitude ' " Longitude • ' '=
L�-
Design Current Design Cuirrent
Swine Capa Population Poultry- ' "Ca acity- Population Cattle
[3 Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
& 0 Q
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I❑ Non -Dail
❑ Other
-Total Design Capacity
_ =TotaI.SSLW
Current
Po ulahon
I-
Number -Lagoons i ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
of
HoldingPonds /, Solid Traps :` ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
- _
Dischar es & Stream Impacks
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 29 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
h- If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? ^A
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes [R No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 5
Identifier: 1
Freeboard(inches): ..... ..-U......--- •.......................................... ............ I ........... I........... .................................................................. I.........
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes B No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
.6 Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste APPlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
�z24q
❑ Yes
IR No
❑ Yes
® No
29 Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ Yes
0 No
12. Crop type M.1W, Sorgl.u►-1 , �mq/� 0, -Ao'" , Fes,Gv - 6,_t,YL I Be-1 u d,,A 6 Aro
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes [3 No
14_ a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Rev i ewer/[ nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0' NO.yiolatidiis;oi: deficiencies were pbted- diWifng this.visit. - Y:oit will -r; eead* iio further
. • . • correspondence. al�rnuk this visit...
Coininents (refer`to que�on #) Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations oivany other cotni
Use drawings of facility to; better -explain srtuatroins (vse additional pages as necessary) -'
JR Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes iB No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes j No
8. Ttie ►ma`s a" in mo, y y3ovie-iAL
19�� , b�k w�tnc�ows �'or a�vpl{rGy}iotn ice► L.✓Gt4e- 101o,v, q/'C pep /LIOV
and T-e6rua,y-Aiya'^(1 . V_.e-id Oil 12aW 3 kre( 4165 /at.re air Ii-d
61forin) 4-kcsc P-ion44s 6rV''tccy I �vnG ��U�� L�1 td 60) tGL4 (. 64 33 16f/Gt,rc
F—ialdt 01I 1�iw `j LtQr.� � rbf �cl�r [ a�J/ tt e,d ri t.ILi o�i t�at�✓ (a lead 33 !bs/��e-;
i ;old O1! Kow `7 In -Let 5'S I s�acre 41,(hed,'r,01,4 02f� 12ow B 1,�d 22 16s1aC1015,
All o'C `FZtese rbwS arc om FesG e aLtd •• L c Arr o-� -PnN 1,'Acd a6ovc
�4�1. .akyrReviewer/Inspector Name S-eG% I ��
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r Date: i Z/-z A q
3/23/99

Facility Number: — $� (, Date of Inspection 1 Z
Odor ISSUeS
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ® Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
2& Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes E] No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes M No
31 _ Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes F No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? S1 Yes ❑ No
Additional- ornmeuts�an or.. rawings
were 1^ta4e, 6e4we4Yt mA y a"Ld T01� . Be sure 4tr DjlaW -yr It'cet+ ich AL
F; e 1d l l I raw 371 ZOO J f I /a c f e aD � l t'e•� o ►� 11�31
geld 1[i� Row hAd 3Z15S8 gal /acre a�pl;�d a" !z-/1Igr1
l I J god 13 4a d. 3 z Z 19 a `
� 9 Acre "rlpJilrc,�G� o� r[�3Dl�a
—rkeSe OtF f eA4:Ov.S are All dh bey�m"Al. A►1y
G�p1 ��aovt feSl/i ii�t� ►r,
wto re -th 1a h Z9
'7, f 514 a 1 AC, re is e-kc,ec.4, f bU I
'Be-r^�►�c�'�l nod fa✓�kGecda✓tlr� ove✓1atd,� -For
one Apr rfG
41iJs its
n orlon co v t A re.<t)l+,
b (eS 6 ka ctl d be, repo ved Aram 4-6e? Sf ra y f e Id
-1r S pe-ndca - v- 4: w e-qo bl-e GeGrt Ol��e lrn;rtaTi a h
►5, Word +0 bl e ffS-l-VrC ,-7-
t7l� r C. i S preG{om/►2�rvt�l�
r�c q-+ 4�e �reSeh t `�^�e„_ Ar)p1y i;,%,c ar&O'dy'v le soil - es}
4o 4elr ;—wove ceor• f
q'� hats beovi 6raaG[eg5#. dark �a eeZst�r� �Zt�� q rtoadl
—Tl 4� �,1St'h�,
cS-[�'+�t
3/23/99

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
I} Division of Water Quality
IQ Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DNV2 ins action O FolloA-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of inspection '-S-d 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered 10 Certified © Applied for Permit © Permitted 113 Not O crationa] Date bast Operated: ..
Farttt Nantes .._...4sQ.......F.9xf+Ax.41[ f County:.........41�?li
!� ff ........L1 rir�............................................................. .
OwnerName:........r`"txcld��....... �itlt............................................................................... Phone No:..�.%1R.�.�.� �".i'.735................. 1.......................
Facility Contact: ...1?..0.9............l to .............................. Title: ............................... ...................... I.......... Phone No:..[g[Q�. S..-. .�......
MailingAddress: ......5D ?...NZC.kjol I'1.......&WIC"A............................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:........`] yr�...... N.<.A............................................................. Integrator:.....kvq...
Certified Operator................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number............ �.. ...........
Location of Farm:
sarr!!�...:5.._o.v�....i:.. >`..�. 5�.....9Q....r�iL��....nor........a �K..L..l."1,...............................................................................
..... ............. -- -- . •--•............................................... ........ w
Latitude ' ° 46 Longitude ' 4 44
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in-,Wmin?
A. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7125/97
❑ Yes
f� No
❑ Yes
® No
N
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
1�4 No
❑ Yes
99 No
❑ Yes
MNo
❑ Yes
® No
Continued on back

Facility Number: 3!�
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes N No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Freeboard(ft):............ L 4 ..................................................... ..........................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
....................................
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes [5 No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop....51?++.KM7f...."Ynr.u.Lk..................wl�ln.. .... ! r.. n................................
h'Pe .. _. Cth1+�l�.�...............G..:..............kGSL.II.e:..............................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes 11No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
C? No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
09 No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
No.violationsor. defieiencies. we noted during this:visit:- You:will receive, no•ftirtlier- ;
cOrespotidence about this:visit., ;
,z• �1y
j_n
5�)o�i
-
ecv%�cUtr},.�
ZL. �a5�
1,61Y`tCAs
s1xwkc
64
EoP w-A.
p?rWtiS
bers, �"kn tAmic u4-,
liyA+'i41 tlbh.
r✓ros�r. 0 r% c N .a" tvvO - ka+lz heel.- INT"Mi 04J ,reWeled_
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name- _',�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature- /��, ,% Date:

J!lRoutine Q Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Date of Inspection 1A ?
Facility Number 3
Time of Inspection �'i ; 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted I or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ._ .... aL ? �_ .l t t .. S.fi.lC ._� ..... _...._......_ .....__............. County.-.....:U4!.k,-........................................ _ .........
Land Owner Name: ............................. Phone No:
Facility Conctact:...,1�_... ��slup r r _ _ Title: _.. Qlc!A1C........................ Phone No:..L91.4� Z? : Z .............
Mailing Address: _....... ....... ............ _.... 21 e.�a........
Onsite Representative: ..... f ...... .._ Integrator:._
Certified Operator: .. ctl.►L....... Operator Certification
Location of Farm: I
......... l...sxti..:..Tirr,a....r+ ,aan......
Latitude 3y -.• ®' 1-J Longitude �• +�% ®S u
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Swine Desix n CUrCe11t DeS1 1l CQITeIIt k" a: sr g g s Designs Current
.� �,f. ��Ca aei ",Po uiahon a_goultry Wa aci Po ulation� 1,CattteC� acE h:`Po Mahon
,_ ❑Wean to Feeder ❑ La er �� ❑ Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish❑ Non La er ❑ Non Da
Farrow to Weanx��� o M
12, myy f 4w `4 5a
Farrow to Feeder o0 Total DesignGapaeity (n6o
2 �.
Farrow to Finish ffi
❑ Other Totat MEMO 3!3 100 "
,���.-
Number of Lagoons /4 ldiiij,#ondill Vt ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
La oon Area S ra Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes J3 No
❑ Yes R,No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes (�)No
❑ Yes [PNo
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes Pq No
Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Yes ❑ No
Continued on back

Facility Number: .•.. 1..:..---...._...._
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Struclures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes UNo
Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...._................�ay. udc.............................. ..... ........................... ........
.
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Ce-dified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes '&No
Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes $d No
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Yes 12 No
❑ Yes W No
19 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [&No
14 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ($No
❑ Yes W No
❑ Yes 4No
❑ Yes (RNo
Comments `(refer to questton#} Explain any YES ;answers' and/or any recommendations or any;,other comments;'.
Use drawing c'dfacility to better explain situatioiw;(use�additional pages as necessary
x =� z
.Y\.kA
S wtoor. 1�fi \4-s )had 6 6e usetV�� i hes iy\
4,%17 • C;Samosbr. O_Mct_f.-� O-K `11,- 10nO-t' waljt 9 it-CMV\ Sl 041 �'e_-1
�j Wto'_J
C1O_1 a
�(Est't'C1QU. Doa^t t~re&5 5�'14�1t} be reseeded. 1nit� la�l�is shca we ezdej err t.'Jv
4L-L ( aeon . C ooc-r ckt— Q as CO 0 605 Per) 5 Lod 3 bQ.
4
1 g • N� i 11,t,� G+r� S Ill t� � � imP,ro�t'cl • .
Reviewer/Inspector Name =i` i,��
'
>=.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Y % Zp-�
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

s
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Farm Name/Owner:
DATE: 8 — S , 1995
Time: ( 13 a
t.+A� _SU
Mailing Address: 5;-0 cj_ O r w csu rQ--- t G vt e-a ' .
County: -
Integrator: _ tt c' ! + Phone:
On Site Representative: -nr-sc��� �ha �� Phone: _ lo),S-
Physical Address/Locadon: rs C_S a- 1 G 70 Z- r-,,
O
Type of Operation: Swiney Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity- `a S of _ Number of Animals on Site: (-=, OO S o t,3
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ?�° Z ��" Longitude: 4 & Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches Ye r No Actual Freeboard: -3 .Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or co as any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? es r No Is the cover crop adequate? GNr No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? es No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet'of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of�the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes o No
Additional Comments: `l_ ems.- ' KP_,P_Q
\J,j�
Inspector Name
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

OPERHTIONS LRHfqCH - WQ Fax:[phone] Jul 13 '95 9:12 P.06/17
• ,-_ ''� - "'=':rM•59)'.�u° rt., ,r�;�: V..:`��
Site ega=s Tm ediate Attei�tivn
SI B �' SITATI ti RFCORD
DATE: r-�� , 1995
•
C;
Owner. � � L - - 1 ° .� Fain Name: --
County- . j`-t- vl�
Agent Visiting Site: _��— ' - Phone:
Operator:
Gil Site Representative:
Pbysica.l Address; __41
Mailing Address:
2`)0
Phonic. ---
-- Phouu.
61rd 4A
Type of Operation: 5wirIe Foul" � Cartle
Dcsinn Capacity:
Number of Animals on Site,
Latitude: _ 0 -_�' _,, Longitude:
Type of Inspection: Ground ---- Aerial _ T..
Circle, Yes or No
n
Does the A-nimad Waste Lagoon have sufficien eboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 how storm event
(approximately I Foot+7 inches) Yes c IV Actual Freeboard: Feet y- - Inches
For faollities with more than one Iagoon, pl=se address the other lagoons' freeboard, under the
comments section,
Was any seepage, observed frerr the lagoan(s)? Yes o Na '4�as there erosion or the dam7: Yes c+z No
Is adegtmu-, land availablc for Iand application? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Additknnal. Comments:
Fax to (919) '715-3559
Signature of went