310523_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H LAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

Type of Visit: Com liance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1,7 Arrival Time: �: eparture Time: County: av Region
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
MAL
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:.
Design Current Design
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity
Wean to Finish I ILayer I
Current
Pop.
Design
Cattle Capacity
Dairy Cow
Current
Pop.
Wean to Feeder I jNon-Layer
I
EE-
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design
Farrow to Feeder Dr, P,oultr. Ca aci
Farrow to Finish Lavers
Current
Pn ..
D Cow
Non -Dal
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
El
Boars Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other Turke Poults
Other Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes nNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E�rNo
❑ Yes ,❑"No
❑ Yes ,E:'No
❑ Yes ,Eno
❑ Yes ff No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ONE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is'siorage'capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
'0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
PTNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
[:]Yes
0—No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
)Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? T
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �jNo ❑ NA E] NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ;2TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes 4�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 'oNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements []Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes 1pNo ❑ NA ONE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections []Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page +2 of 3 21412011 Continued
µ. -> .

[Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permi ?
❑ Yes 4fNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is he facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes ff No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes P""No
❑ NA ❑ N1
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes z f No
J�
❑ NA [3 NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
Yes FNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes ANo
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes 0-No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
egNo
[]Yes XNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
-.%c xi
viilO 1135
(f 131Z V
Reviewer/Inspector Name: (lf� UCC7rs/ (% . _ Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 2
Page 3 of 3 /4/20I

()- P �y'
Facili Number: - Date of Ins ection• d
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [] Yes ❑ No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain. Any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations orkany other comments; _ T `­ 4
Use drawin s of facility to better explain situations use additional., a es as'necessa' X,m. w,`F',,,.j. .
g Y P C ly rY)• Y'.. .
GtPt / S/.r Gam/ X"01-
Y
I
t,/ u•�� 4(M . ®/ cq.-e 7a 4"c
R A Gcj (Jrl�•r -�..,
4r*6c4"-e G, AP.-
•0
r ur ✓ yr �P�aof
a r4ia a5ao>n
U ✓1 �- 2._ { ry% S
0 Opp
• Y q��� /tQ�
Aavt l e,-
r4fr
"i.1:.e,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: !R/O ( -7
Date: ra
21412011

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
October 27, 2010
Donnell Kornegay
Kornegay Farms
362 Scotts Store Road
Mt. Olive, NC 28365
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310523
Kornegay Farms
Animal Waste Management System
Duplin County
Dear Donnell Kornegay:
The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge survey information on October
26, 2010. With the survey results, you requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement
for the lagoon at the Kornegay Farms facility. Due to the amount of treatment volume available,
the Division agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until 2014 for your lagoon.
The next sludge survey for the lagoon at Kornegay Farms facility should be performed before
December 31, 2014.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please call me at [phone] if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
J. R. Joshi
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS310523
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location; 2728 Capital Blvd., Ralegh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] ti FAK 919-715.05881 Customer Service: 1$77-623-6748
IntPmet: www.nrwatPmualitv.om
OCT 2 g 20i0
NorthCarolina
Naturally
An Enual Oworfunily 1 Affirmative ACtlon Employer

Type of Visit QrCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit OROutine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral Q Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: I Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Des
Swsne, �'Capi
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
;, ❑ Boars
❑ Other
.r:..
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: e = 6 = Longitude:
:n Current, ` x
ity� Populahon,�� Wet,_Poultr
a
LJ Non-
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Puilets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
j
m
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Daia Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Da Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. is any discharge observed from any part ofthe operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
V No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes JZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes,/O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes PNo []NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes gfL ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding - ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
)❑No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
'P'No
PrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
9'1<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
--, `: .-s .- .- :-: - :. .�..�:. .:;.-; ',.:. i �. ;m,s"�..« is .:.. R s+:.-sa,a�r`�,:i'1 '4Y ..�``�+4 A -"
Comments,(refer to questions#) x Explain any YES.answers and/or any recommendations or any otherrcommcnts r
.rE.a� ., ,*�A �_ •lay �. Wjt s'
Use drawings of facilit to` better eit lain situations: use adds lo.nal a esoas necessar €� _ ,
8 y p p g- Y
11161, C GN
iewer/Ins ector Name `, a �®.� ``p � �� � ;. �, ���. � � ;� Phone:iewer/Inspector
E
Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 12/2404 ' Continued

Facility Number; ' — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes J2"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes [,�Ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
,--,/rv:
❑ Yes LJ o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers El Annual Certification
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly FreeboarVI
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield0 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V
Rain Inspections PWeather Code
1
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes �Wo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes PQo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes VrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
5. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
1yes J#Ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes J2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
E2'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
;'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
J'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
jffNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
EfrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
[;No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
1,3 fole .,Ta1v
ck
AL
ee,�;s;e
JL// d` �� / /!'�,S �c��Z�v� � (5 Per
0
,Z
Page 3 of 3 `cac �
f'zIJCG ('Gi-7 %4 1- G ,G, a /S• e/ � .5;,4
,9e �� (� 12128104
Znl,-e-.�_ A-1 Ge5icf 4

ALTIFW4
'N�Ia
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Caleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
November 10, 2009
Donnell Kornegay
Kornegay Farms
320 Scott Store Rd
Mount Olive, NC 28365
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310523
Kornegay Farms
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin County
Dear Donnell Kornegay:
In accordance with your requests for renewal, we are hereby forwarding to you this COC issued to
Donnell Kornegay, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management system in
accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Kornegay Farms, located in Duplin County, with a swine animal capacity of no
greater than the following annual averages:�,,�,
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: 1196 Boar/Stud: NOV 1 2 2009
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other: BY
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS310523 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CAWMP and this'COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. _Please pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitorin * conditions in this permit. Record kee]2ing forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location; 2728 Cagizal Bivd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 n4
Phoney 919.733.3221 1 FAY,: 919-715-05881 Custorrrer Service: 1-877.623.6748 NorthCarolina
Internet: www.ncwatorquaihy.org -� �}n,�1� f'�,���
An Equal OpnortuniN l Aff[rmaiive Anion Enrhloyer � �/LG KG

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property,
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond; or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition I1.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time:that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Newport/Morehead City, NC
National Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at
www.r.rh.noaa.g6v/er/mhx/.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone].
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Duplin County Health Department
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWS310523)
AFO Notebooks
Murphy -Brown.. LLC
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
-2 -

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor - Director
July 1, 2009
Donnell Kornegay
Komegay Farms
320 Scott Store Rd
Mount Olive, NC 28365
Subject: Additional Information Request
Application No. AWS310523 ;
Kornegay Farms
Duplin County
Dear Donnell Kornegay:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
The Animal Feeding Operation Unit of Division of Water Quality's Aquifer Protection Section has
completed a preliminary review of your renewal permit application package. Additional information is
required before we maycbntinue our review. Please address the following items within 30 (thirty) days
of rece�pt.of thi�;lett`r�,
1. Signature Missing:
The renewal application must be signed and dated by facility's owner. Please complete the
enclosed signature page and send it to the address given at the bottom of this page.
Please be aware that you are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules and
regulations. Any oversights that occurred in the review of the subject application package are still the
responsibility of the applicant. In addition, any omissions made in responding to the above items shall
result in future requests for additional information.
Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. All revised
and/or additional documentation shall be signed, sealed and dated, with two (2) copies submitted to my
attention at the address below. Please note that failure to provide this additional information on or before
,the above requested date may result in your application being returned as incomplete.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may
result in a civil penalty. Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would
constitute a violation ofNCGS 143-215.1 and could result in assessments of civil penalties of up to
$25,000 per day.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699.1636
Internet: www,ncwaterquality.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
1 i Carolina
�4rra!!y
Telephone: [phone]
Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

F
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
Enclosure
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Murphy -Brown, LLC
APS Files- AWS310523
incerely,
Christine D. Blanton
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
j:;.0z4=)MXN D
BY:
JUL 0 6 2009

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
i��'� =_PJED ! D=1t ! Dwo
Animal Waste Management Systems kttl05j ^ prntecllori sectim
Request for Certificate of Coverage ki.Aut 01i Z00104
Facility Currently Covered by an Expiring State Non -Discharge General Permit
On September 30, 2009, the North Carolina State Non -Discharge General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will
expire. As required by these permits, facilities that have been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these State Non -
Discharge General Permits must apply for renewal at least 180 days prior to their expiration date. Therefore all applications must be
received by the Division of Water Quality by no later than April 3, 2009,
Please do not leave any question unanswered. Please make any necessary corrections to the data below.
1. Facility Number: 310523 and Certificate of Coverage Number: AWS310523
2. Facility Name: Komegay_Farms
3. Landowner's name (same as on the Waste Management Plan): Donnell Korneeay
4. Landowner's Mailing address: 320 Scott Store Ind
City/State: Mount Olive, NC Zip: 28365
Telephone Number (include area code): 9196585685 E-mail:
5. Facility's physical address: % 15 a I _ At _.��1�(l�� � ors Pj
City/State: -'I ra , Q 1 i ' 0 1J elZip: 4 r63 in
6. County where facility is located: Duplin
7. Farm Manager's name (If different than the Landowner):
S. Farm Manager's telephone number (include area code):
9. Integrator's name (if there is not an integrator write "None"): Murphy Family Farms
10. Lessee's name (if there is not a lessee write "None"):
11. Indicate animal operation type and number:
Swine
Cattle
Dry Poultry
Wean to Finish
Dairy Calf
Non Laying Chickens
Wean to Feeder
Dairy Heifer
Laying Chickens
Farrow to Finish
Milk Cow
Turkeys
Feeder to Finish 1196
Dry Cow
Other
Farrow to Wean
Beef Stocker Calf
Pullets
Farrow to Feeder
Beef Feeder
Turkey Poults
Boar/Stud
Beef Brood Cow
Gilts
Other
Other
Wet Poultry
Horses - Horses
Sheep - Sheep
Non Laying Pullets
Horses - Other
Sheep - Other
Layers
cf-%Dnn DVXIV%llAI cTATC f'VXICDAI 1111nn

Submit two (2) copies of the most recent Waste Utilization Plan for this facility with this application. The Waste Utilization
Plan must be signed by the owner and it technical specialist. If a col2y of the facility's most recent Certified Animal Waste
Mana ement Plan CAWMP has not previousiv been submitted to the NC Division of Water Oualitv, two 2 copies of the
CAWMP must also be submitted as Bart of this application.
I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that, if
all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included,
this application package will be returned.to me as incomplete. Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-
215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in'any application may be subject to
civil penalties up to S25,000 per violation. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10.000 or
imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both for a similar offense.)
Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign. If Landowner is a corporation,
signature should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name: Title:
Signature:
Name:
Signature:
Date:
Title:
Date:
Name: Title:
Signature:
Date:
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NCDENR — DWQ Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
FORM RENEWAL -STATE GENERAL 02/09

0-Mvision of Water Quality
FAcility NumberQ`.Division of�Soil.andMater Conservation
0.
Other Agency.
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:
I I.W
Arrival Time: Q s -
Departure Time: County: Region: 1
Farm Name:
.fT ✓✓
cr. / a' 1-�
6� Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Phone:
Title: Phone No:
Integrator•
Certified Operator: I Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
`❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: ❑ e ❑ 6 = Longitude: = ° 0 ` ❑ "
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current -
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Daia Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stockei
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
e. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Numbe-,-2- 3Z;� Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
14. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
St re 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window [:]Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination'?[] Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
A
Reviewer/Inspector NameVff�lr,Phone: %
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: let Date: 3
2
121281041 Continued

Facility Number: 3 Date of Inspection 3/
•Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard [Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
—Oc
Od C
12128104

,lk
0"Division of Water Quality
Fagility Number j 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
_ O Other Agency
rR
ype of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
eason for Visit �)Aoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: J6 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: z K-602� 01�
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Phone:
Phone No.•
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: = o ❑ . ❑ Longitude: ❑ o = , = "
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
1 10 Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dai_ry Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes
El No
El NA
[3 NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑Yes
[I No
❑NA
El NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number:, — Date of inspection D
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier;
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roomed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
l l . Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): .
Reviewer/Inspector Name _ Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ,Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield 01120 Minute Inspections Allm,onthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
•❑ NE
Additional Comments. and/or Drawings:
q,q
�fdbl°b a v
l �S�e�la�l
Page 3 of 3 I2aVO4

(Type of Visit L Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance 1
Reason for Visit'Ergoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access I
Date of Visit: 7 k Arrival Time: IDS Departure Time: County: 'IF - �-- Region:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: / Title:
Onsite Representative:
�J
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:LLC
Operator Certification umber:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = 1 Longitude: = ° 0 1 =
dt
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
1' ❑ Non -Layer I - - - --
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
I
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures: Ell
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
ETNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
210'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number:Date of Inspection00�_
Waste Collection &Treatment
�(
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes L�J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes J] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes ;No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;2 &o []NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes SXVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ AppLLration Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s) IF .r
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Plo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
�?No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination"
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�No
[__1 NA
❑ NE
Iwww/M
/D a/
Phone:
Reviewer/]nspector Name ! ram: `^
M
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 3� Date of Inspection
Reau!reld Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 4?'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ZYes )AINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking LZCrop Yield 7 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and I " Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes 0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
L"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NE
El Yes
❑ No
,❑NA
y
L1 NA
❑ NE
El Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA. ['EVE
❑ Yes �No
[:)NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes no
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes Ao
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes zNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Canments and/or Drawings Y�� ° ;� , ` . �1 ►r. , ; ;ry '� to , `» % .y
dL 1 PAS G Kee, p a- G a e cn o-C— ) 0�.6O Q rl A OS L r6vN
14 l41t O 0 5 t >IG (_v rof S
,2 i�` Carol Grail yIC-WS
cry i b ! n 86c)�
0��'y•
12128104

ANIMAL FACILITY ANNLrAAF, CERTIFICATION FORM
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number ��3 County
Year 200 3
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit)
Operator in Charge for this Faciliry� Certification
"Land ate lication of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year
YES NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part 11 and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste
was generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled. 10
Part! : Facility Information:
i . Dotal number of application Fields n or Pulls "ease check the appropriate boy:) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWIAP): 10 Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
a0
2. Total number of Fields ❑ or Pulls ` 1 (please check the appropriate box) on which land application
occurred during the year: Total Acres on which waste was applied - 1 � ' 42_
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and
the permit:
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken
off site during the year
tons 0. or gallons '—i (please check the appropriate box)
Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the
(These numbers are for infbrmationai purposes onl1r since the only permit limit on the number of animals
at the facility is the annual average numbers)
8. Facility's Integrator if applicable: M uts Cb ujh _ L L
Part Ili: Facility Status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND E3s:PLAR CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRJNC THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during ...`'Yes No
the oast calendar year.
FIECFIVED
AFACF 3-14-0
MAR 4 2 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTO 4
Non-t?ischa

?. The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from /es L� No
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year.
3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past �' Y es No
calendar year.
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during ✓Yes No
the past calendar year.
5. There was no PAN application to any fields ox- crops at this facility greater than the No
levels specified in this facility's CAAW during the past calendar year.
b. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year. �cs —'No
7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment vole qe to less than the vo jvine
for which the lagoon was designed. UU e � Lkrv0 Lj �� �*�-t`S-UroQ ' r@�
S. A co of the Annual Sludge Survey Fo�i-n for hi�s facp�r is attached to this Certification.
FY g Y
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the
past calendar year.
10. Soil PH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year?
11. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's
permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied ., ith during
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
13. Crops as specified in the CAWMP were maintained during the past calendar year on all
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
Yes ' ' No a, j%
Yes _ hvN f A
�2-'res 0No
?"Yes J No
:? Yes i- No
Yes D INC
2'Y es I No
1:_�Yes " No
" I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.'
N
t'ermittee Name and t itie f i 'De Q)r orintl
y
�Id
Signature of Operator in Charge Date.
(if different from Permittee)

r.
Murphy -Brawn LLC
April 12, 2004
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Rose Hill Division
Contract Growers
Dear DONNELL KORNEGAY JR,
P.O. Box 759
Rose Hill, NC 28458
91 a289-2111
910-289-6478 Fax
arR 2 � 2�74�
aolsv SEGme
�1G'�
?�on5&ame
Ii your fa.-r:� is cm-rently covered by an NPDES permit, as a requirement of your permit, you
should have completed an annual certification form that summarized the environmental activities
on your farm for 2003. If you are not under an NPDES permit, ignore this Ietter. You will recall
that one of the questions on this annual certification form asked for your annual animal
population average. In a series of grower meetings that many of you attended, we committed to
provide you with your annual average inventories on or around the anniversary date of your
permit. Your annual average inventory, based on the information in our tracking system for
groups closed from 4-24-03 through 4-5-04 is as follows:
Facility Name Facility No. Permitted Head Actual Averaize
DONNELL KORNEGAY JR 031-0523 1196 1072.4
If you did not provide the annual inventory average to DENR in your annual report, you should
forward this correspondence to them by the end of the month. They should be sent to the
following address:
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
Permitting Unit
Attn. Keith Larick
i 617 I`lail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27626-1617
In addition, a copy of this correspondence should be kept with your environmental files.
If there are any questions or concerns regarding either the information contained in this letter, or
other environmental issues, please feel free to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kraig Westerbeek
Director of Environmental Compliance

I
,
4'y (�T� J it - •tit �
�
I APR 2 = pa-KN1,
1i7; 2004
WATT-RCL;A rrSECT,Fcv�,

(Type of Visit 9FCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation. I
Reason for Visit o Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility NumberD_ffzT1___j
©ate of Visit:
)zrPermJitW)dCerdfied © Conditionally Certified (J Registered
Farm Name: 1k, AL,�'�. ...� / C.�.2�.. _.. _..._..._........__
Tune: Q7
Operational O Below
Date- Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..� �. _.» ...
County:-1L »._...._._......__ .._...».».»».»..
OwnerName: ........».»..._._......._._......»..»».... ..» _....W_.»._ ».__»......_._..___._W........ 'Phone No: ....................................... ».».».............»...............
MailingAddress: ...... ............................ »...»»....................................................... »».... »»........»....... _.......____......._......................_.....
FacilityContact: ................ .................. _%._.. ...»..».. Title: ... ................................. ...... :._..__.... Phone No: .»............ »».... ». »__._...
Onsite Representative: ,__2oh,.. .._ .........._.. Integrator: »� G... ........... _...._. _....... »..
Certified Operator: .......... _ .......... _.._...... »....._.».. __. _._...._.__............. »_._....»... Operator Certification Num—ber:... ._.. ,....... _.... _.......
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 44 Longitude * 4 d;4
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes eNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ­.;allo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes Ellqo
Waste Collection & Treatment —/
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? [2 Spillway El Yes e'No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier: » .._... _... .».»» ..__» ...... _ .._ .__........ --- ...._--- ».»._------------------ ._....__._.......___....._.._.__.._.».._ .....
Freeboard (inches):
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: -- Date of inspection /
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, El Yes ,To
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes -ErNo
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes TNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes E No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes 4!TNo
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes A21fqo
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Cerd
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Plan (CAVW)?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
ee cal
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspeetor Signature:
l � c 0 cam" �S'�-cc���
❑ Yes j2NNo
❑ Yes E5No
❑ Yes E!rNo
[3 Yes .E]'No
❑ Yes ,8'N0
❑ Yes P1Qo
❑ Yes P No
[:]Yes , 2No
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes )21ro
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Date:
12,112/03

Facility Number.- —,$ Date of Inspection 1 Oe
Reouirtd Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes RtNo
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes Z*iko
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 23140
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes O No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes "Mo
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
, ,�!
�ro
❑ Yes
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
+.�
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspeciion with on -site representative?
❑ Yes .? i No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes Ofio
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes sZ<o
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes 090
3 L If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes ❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
Not O erational Q Below Threshold
[$ Permitted M Cerrrt�tified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: �C/1�A a •r'xf/ /ir+T County: odl
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: // A Q,--
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator: G/
IF
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 0 �• �u Longitude • �• ��
Swine
„, IE
Canacity .:Population .; Poultry Canacity Ponulation. 'Cattle Canacit", Ponu r"enti Design Current . Desi n 1 Current `` I Design Cu
lation
We to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
I/
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Li Non -Layer I I I i ILJ Non -Dairy I I
❑ OtheI I
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW',"i
r 4f I;r. E t;rtf -; E33 Ea Nu,
mber of Lagoons ;: i ' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area ❑ 5 rav�FieId Area
Holding Punds/ESolidIraps, i 10 No Liquid Waste Mana ement S stem
Discharges & Stream i_ mpacts
I . is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ LaRoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Wlection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: 1
Freeboard (inches),
❑ Yes moo`
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 2 no
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes L`7No
Structure 6
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes M-Ao
❑ Yes [ No
❑ Yes ± No
❑ Yes [$Ns
❑ Yes K-1 o�
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
[3.-Adis
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
I2. Crop type � ,5 . , --4r �i:�
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
22-No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[4ico'
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑Yes
[I No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
ONo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
M-Nb
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
91-no
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
[44F0-
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
[9-fiTo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
[�ft
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
DNb
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes [A-?qo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑•X01
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes EFNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes [9'No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments {refer tu.queshon #) Ezplaln any±YESFansvversgnd/or any recommendattons3orfany£other comments.,
,.4 iij
Else diawtngs,of facility±to better explain situatioas.f(use additional pages as necessary) ` '
0 Field C'onv [] Final Notes a
i .1
Z�ez-a P, o P1� e,,,
AL
.. r. ..,. «n wq... -y-,- -w—.-• ..,.-......y.-. -. w'. 1 ...�,+ $Y`� V.M.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: / Zi
05103101 0
Continued

ry
Facility Number: 3 — Date of Inspvctinn _ , -
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atior below
❑ Yes
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
['rhr
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
o
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
M-Ko
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (Le, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
C5"n—o
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
[+tlo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent./temporary cover?
❑ Yes
J
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:,'..'
O5103101

1�. I> -.��
I Division of Water_Quahty F rti t OFt . tJ r; ,�,.
0, Division of Soi! and Water Conservation I �� r"jIr' �� +: I I M
u :r [ r J
€ li'.OtherAgency�;
c a,� P
�,..-, 1:1t.,.�'Tir - .0 �. ,. .. �r .,...x .�.'�.�.T. I ».. ,. <.
Type of Visit jai Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit X Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit:
31 2 3
Permitted © Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered
Farm Name: ..........ra.'.I..':'"�.:j.................................—................
Ir7 k ir �-
Z O I Time: 1 Q� Printed on: 7/21/2000
10 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
County:!? Is .. ....................................
Owner Name: 6 h..rx4. d Y} E
..................... ...................................................... .......... Phone No:........................
FacilityContact:..............................................................................•I'itle:................................................................ Phone No -
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: „1D6v1 nC #... r ht?�jQ.!r.............................. Integrator: .h'1.0 e �g.'`'1.5... . ....................... ........
Certified Operator : ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification umber:.................. ........................
Location of Farm:
i
Imo!
10 Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 �'°° Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer I I JE1 Dairy
ff Feeder to finish j j (55 ❑ Non -Layer I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
[:]Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
El Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lawson Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management Systcm .
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. Ii'dischargc'is observed, was the conveyance ratan -made? ❑ Yes DU No
h. If discharge is ohserved, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes No
e. If discharvc is observed, what is the estimaled flow in galhnin? h'eti
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? [:]Yes 2j No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge'? ❑ Yes 0 No
Waste Collection & Treattuent
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
SWUdUTC I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: .............................................. ........
Freeboard (inches): 41
5100
❑ Spillway t ❑ Yes X No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Continued on back

Fhcility Number: S 1 -- $5 Date of Inspection 2 S 4 Printed on: 1/9/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes �J No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancc/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Agplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes XNo
12. Crop type Corn) LJLiPod�1 SeyteakX., 13ty "1vit-, Rs4ure I {
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes rNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
g No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
29No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes`j
No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
XNo
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklis(s,. design, maps, etc.)
-KYes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
.5;rNo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
9No
23,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ONo
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
I'No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes AV No
. • �•yiI ggs'o!•• dfciertcie-wire jngtea- rig #s:vst; � Y;oix �vjti•eeiye Ott fu>�tt$r'
cories' oiidence: abotil this visit.
Comments (refer: to questiota #): 3Eirpialn'aay,,YEs ap weirs an&/ any recommeh' t�ions ors any other eomments.y -' ,A
Use drawings of facility„to.better explain,situations. (use3,6dditii64'pages
�►t44e✓'C 1l ci ocw, 1.vAS e F)A n 41,G'144e 0'je
cvr r8 r< O vl 014ai h wC0 4 q. G k1A hAve GVQ f aL IC J?e :fore Art
Rc✓a��el ;.I ��� Wa.i-L�Q, ►d,a1�c.'"-r 4 f,e ►'LV".Se4� i,rri q-�►`o�o�e� � k
stir a���"J ab41, ! frLg0001 dss;5k/vole-ie elleck �hr r•►� 11 y
atTinl.7_
a hd recafd5 *-e/o
►�
'6 B
Reviewer/Inspector Name I�IQi �, - g 1 4� `�, 4 _ �� g`4�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: z- 0 n sm

Z/ ZS/o :
facility Number: 31 -SZ3I Date of Inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or hplow XYes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ONo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes JUNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 91 No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) [:]Yes JdNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes JZNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a pc manent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes J'No
5/00

Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection —Oo
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted © Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered 0 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .......1�►�Q���"....v............................................ County: ......1'1......................... .......................
OwnerName ...................:............................. Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: ........................................................................ ..Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:............................................................................................................................................................... ............................ ..........................
...........
OnsiteRepresentative: .! .... '... ..` ��` .... ........ Integrator:.......'.........'`...�................................I—............... ............. ............... ................ ..
CertifiedOperator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 4 66 Longitude • 4 «
Design ` "Current
Design 4 Current lei, j �_{ iDes�gn`E�, `'Current
Ca" o trY
Ca' aci ulation'r� Cattle,�r,t "aci 'fi�Po0ulatsom'
E ... aci . elation
..Po �.�€',Ca`
❑ Wean to Feeder " ❑ Layer
; ❑Dairy
.' Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer,
a:
❑Non Datr y
�
❑Farrow to Wean
; ❑Other
'i
❑ Farrow to Feeder
w
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
:,Total SSL;W =:
5
•. ••. 3 ..i 111
44 2
--d j i F I� -•�it
E, =Nuitk ber of�La oons ' .'
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
i
❑Lagoon Area ©Spray Feld Area
twl
Holding;Ponds/ SolidTraps. '
❑ No
Liquid Waste Management System k`tF r:, `
Discharges & Stream Impacks
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes KNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (Il' yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (li'yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �Z&0
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes WNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes )j�No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ............33.................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate'threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, [] Yes XNo
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

�4
Facility Number: '3 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
)(No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
)ZNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
',TNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
XNo
Application
_Waste
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
M No
IL Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
;b?(No
12. Crop type C— [ Ins ISG�f ►J .Sy
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
VNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
gNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ONo
Required Records &_Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
gNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
VNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
9No
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
kNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes 4 No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes 5No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 4 No
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes XNo
yiolatxig�s:o ftrjcie'ncie *�re pptea d(rr'ing this vjsat} Your wiil teeiyequftr'
eorresp6fidence:abaut.this visit:.... . • • .... • • • • • • • • • .• •
In
Catnments (refer t6,guesti.on #) ",Explain`;�any YES answers antl�or any recommendations or any other comments r; ,g i s,, t r,
Use drawingsjof facilityto better explain situations o{use addisbonalEpages,as,hecessary) '.=4,'�€'€3
A.
I oOo 1'c ti+\
Reviewer/Inspector Name
�1'1 i1�►1 � ' t. , � . r.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� `�1��� Date: a co

.
Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
O(NO
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
,1•
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
�No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
4No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted'? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
[� No
�
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
1� 0
/
32,
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
R o
Additional Comments and/or rawings:. + ++ +'
4. 1 I
r
7

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
.RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Donnell Kornegay, Jr.
Kornegay Farms
320 Scott's Store Road
Mt. Olive NC 28365
Farm Number: 31 - 523
Dear Donnell Kornegay, Jr.:
RECEIVED
MAR X 7 2000 1 • •
BY.
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
March 15, 2000
You are hereby notified that Kornegay Farms, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for coverage under
an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached
application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session
1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 2769971617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at [phone] extension 363 or Dean
Hunkele with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
Sin ely, /
f
S
or Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Wilmington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Donnell Kornegay, Jr.
Kornegay Farms
320 ScottOs Store Road
Mt. Olive NC 28365
Dear.Donnell Kornegay, Jr.:
,Tk?W,A
IT
4 •
A M2
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility.Number 31-523
Duplin County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRYI, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR], SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
;2,�
u /'
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Donnell Kornegay, Jr.
Kornegay Farms
320 ScottOs Store Road
Mt. Olive NC 28365
Dear Donnell Kornegay, Jr.:
i 0W'J
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 8, 1999
Subject: Conditional Approval
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 31-523
Duplin County
Our records indicate that your facility was conditionally certified in order to fulfill the requirements of
completion of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan Certification. This letter is to inform you of your
unresolved conditional approval status. Any facility receiving a conditional approval must notify Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) in writing within 15 days after the date that the work needed to resolve the conditional certification
has been completed. Any failure to notify DWQ as required, subjects the owner to an enforcement action. As of
December 7, 1999, we have no record of any information from you, advising us of the status of your conditional
approval. Therefore, please fill out the attached form and have your technical specialist and landowner sign the form
in the appropriate areas.
The completed form must be submitted to this office on or before 45 days of receipt of this letter. Please be
advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or liability for failure to
provide DWQ with proper notification of your conditional certification status or possible failure to comply with the
requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste management plan by December 31, 1997.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]
extension 571.
Sincerely,
A"P "V J"'�
Sonya L. Avant
Environmental Engineer
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility pile
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION
S23
Facility Number -
Farm Name:
On -Site Representative:
Inspector/Reviewer's Name:
Date of site visit: S1g,5 �
Revised April 20, 1999
FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Operation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
/ Part 11 eligibility items) F9 F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E7 E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP: 1; Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on P� P2 P3
Annual farm PAN deficit:.�3�5 pounds
Irrigation System(s} - circle #: 1hard-hose traveler; ..2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
B. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part II, overrides Part I exemption:)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D203 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, 'including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75%-rule exemptionbs Verified in Part III. (NOTE:75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part Il. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11- F1 F2 F3, before completing computational -table in Part 111).
PART It. 75% Rule .Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination .required .because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
_ F1 Lack ofacreage _whichresultedin -over m- pplicationmfwastewaten(PAN) on--spray-
field (s) zccord ing fofarm'slast two years nf-in igationzecord s.-.
F2 Unclear, --iliegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious -.field -Iimitations -(numerous:ditches;failurefo:deductTequired.
buffer/setbackacreage;-or25%:oftotal :acreageidentifed:in-.CAWMR includes
small; irregulady-shaped.tields;fields:lessthan -5acres -for travelers -or..]ess-than
2 acres for -stationary -sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage -in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number -
Part Ill. Field by Field Determination of 75°io Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER''2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS'
I
I
i
I
I
i
I
FIELD NUMBER'- hvdrant oull_zone. or:ooint numbers may be used in place of field numbers
deoendin❑ on CAWMP
and type of irrication -system.- If pulls, etc. cross -more -than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBER2 - must be clearly delineated on map. -
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP aUeage:exceeding75% of its total -acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous -two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation Tecords; cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination:;.Back-upfiieldsrnust'be noted in the -comment -section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.
Part IV. Pending WA Determinations
P1
Plan .lacks .following -information:
P2 Plan -revision may:satisfy�75% male based on adequate overall PAN deficit -and by
adjusting -all field -acreage -to below 75% use rate
P3 Other (ielin process of installing new irrigation system):

r Division of Soil and`Water Conservation -Operation Reviews
Division
!t is, yS
'W� '�onser6 �vAtion - c 3� .'-
and'ater CCompliance Inspection
. -�.
Q y p p
IT . Y i < `Ot11er AgenWat4Operadoit`RB Ylew IAnC�eirlS' eetEOn VIplt" ra
Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow -tip of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number sa3 Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection L Z 4624 hr. (hh:mm)
[] Permitted 14 Certified [Q Conditionally Certified [,] Registered [3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
LFarm Name: ..... .�7.. V.'.�."�.................................................... County:.....Y.. ..�.....................................................
OwnerName:........................................................................... ................................................ Phone No:............................,..........................................................
Facility Contact: ..............'Title: ... Phone No:
Mailing Address: ..................................... ....: ......
, ,,•�, ..............................................................
....................... ......... ...............--.......... ...................
Onsite Representative: ............................. Intl Integrator: .....I . ••........42........................................... Certified Operator: ................................................... ....................................................... . .... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm: i
... )..5..�-.u:.......'.T...........J.......�.....!^-�:e:.........J.. ....l .............
c��- s... .1 ..U... � ,- ................... .. ....:►-,.. 7.:..........................................................
Latitude �s 0` �,� Longitude--
' Design Current Design Current ; Design Current
Ca acit Po ulation Poultry: Cipacity, Population. Cattle :Capacity .Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
eederto Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
PA:
❑ Boars
abet of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
L�. �.�
Ponds/Solid Traps 4 _ ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ff No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/rain?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notily DWQ) ❑ Yes VfNo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes j No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes [(No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure h
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): .......... ....................... :.......... ................ .................................... ................................... ......................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes E!(No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

[Facility Number: Date of Inspection
or
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of_over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ r ith thlose des gnated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP; checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes JR No
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 15 No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes U34 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes Ef No
❑ Yes j No
❑ Yes] No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
3/23/99

Facildty Number: t — Date of Inspection
Odor ISSUCti �3
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
xYes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
VNo
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
S"No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
9Yes
❑ No
1440
►bona omments and/or, Drawings
3/23/99

URPHY
FAMILY FARMS
August 4, 1998
N.C. Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
127 North Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
Subject: Lagoon Closure Form
Kornegay Farms
Facility No.: 31-523
Duplin County
AUG 0 6
Please find enclosed a copy of the Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure
Report Form, along with the Lagoon Closure Plan for the above referenced farm.
If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone] ext. 4562.
Sincerely,
M. Kevin Weston
Technical Specialist
cc: File
Post Office Box 759, Rose Hill, North Carolina 28458, [phone], FAX [phone]

t
Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Ford.
(Ptcuce :cc: ur print all information c,1_c not require a :ignatur-•)
Genera E TnFnrmntinn:
`acne of Fa << e0/ZNE(.Ry FAR-M3 Flcilir: `a: 31 fZ3
OW'neri S) `ame: 'PbNNYr.c �arLM�LN`► �R ,
vlailin= address: 3Zo S4orrs Sr.,.c Rw.D Phone No:4i )Gay. SG9S
o Lir 0L.tootti c. z>'_?(t Coun-•: Durz,w
Oneracion Descriotion (remaining animals only)-
0 Plese c:-eck this box U there ccill =c no animals on this r'=, after I_doon closur. [: they_ miiE ial[ br Yttitn_ls on the site
after lagoon ciosurc. please provid- the following infot;natiun oil c;.a nimals that WHil retaain.
er:atlon Descriotion:
Type of No. OfA+tintals
Wean co
Er to Finish
F o,,v .o Wean
l'9.�,:a- 10 C=tier
C_OW :0 . mish
Tcae of Potdrr:
7_1 L y_
1 Pullen;
:\,"O. of Airbltals
TvpeofCar, le +Yo.'of.41thnals
Dsir�•
= 3�c
0.,her pel•iurbergr nt?tta[s:
W-111 two ar-z maintain a number of animals greater than the 2 .0217 chreshoid? Yes -M� lYo rs
Will cce; lagoons be in ooe:-_lion ac this far*:n after this one closes? Yes 2r tiro Cl
How - a:- v lagoons rye left ir use on this farm?:
e i of the iv ate.- Quality Section's scaf= in the Division
of Re_,ionalOr:c_'Save maoonback)
was ccr:-ac:ed on Ida:,-) for nca,,Ic_cion o r c e pendinv closure of :his pane or lagoon.
T «is -ct: =cation was at lease_- hours prior to the scar of closure which beg=. en (dare).
t ac the above in forma -don is correct and cc an plem. I have foitowed a clean:` clan which meets
ail specifications and trivia. I realize chat I wilt ce subject to enfor:.�:enc =cdion per Article 21
or ate Ncrt i Carolina Gene.- ; S=uces if I fail co oroceriv ciose out the lagoon.
`a , e of La Owner (Plerse rinc):
Si�natL� e: Date:
The ac ii c;,r has followed a closure plan which meets all recuirernents sec forth in :% y1ZCS Technical
Guide Sc=dard 993. The following items were comoleced by the owner and ve^tied by me: all waste
liquids and sludges have been :,-moved and land applied ac agronomic race. all inetcc oioas have been
recr.oved. all slopes have beer s,cbilized as necessary, and vegetation esczblisihed on ali disturbed areas.
.Nam, e of Technical Specialist (Please Print): M. K',SvN 1XJE5roAt
On: AIAP11r 'AMil 4AMJr
.dC:rS3 (: zency): _41e Za'Y" _ _phond NO, ear 'Me-
Sig-:ate:e.
K,Cti. n wicran iF anys totlowtng comptecton or antnial water storage pond ur lagoon closure CO.
N'. C. Divi ion Of Water Quality- Water Quality 5ecdon
Complianct: Group
P.O. Batt 29=3=
Raleigh. NC ? i 6? 6-4335
PLC - %lay

R
Name of Farm: Kogr,4c&,4r__ FA.Rmj Facility No. ,3t - Sz.7
w Oners) Name: P&,yA4c c K4XAC4,4V , JR.
Mailing Address/Location: 3za Sco!zg 5..xe AD Phone No./,8-xe.eS
/'& aj r Dc 1 rE , we- r r.14r County:��-1Pun/
This plan describes the closing pocedures for the above referenced farm. The following
closure procedures will be followed in accordance with the current NRCS standards.
1. All existing pipes that were used to discharge waste from the buildings to the
lagoon shall be capped or removed to eliminate fresh water entry from the buildings.
2. All effluent and sludge shall be pumped from the lagoon and shall be land applied
to crops at agronomic rates based on realistic yield expectations for nitrogen. The effluent
and -sludge shall be analyzed for nitrogen content prior to application. During the removal
process, all sludge remaining on the side slopes shall be washed down and agitated in
with the bottom sludge and land applied. There shall be one foot or less of sludge
remaining in the lagoon upon completion. Satisfactory removal of the sludge shall be
determined by visual inspection.
3. Any foreign material other than waste found in the lagoon shall be properly
disposed of in a permitted landfill facility. Such material cannot be buried on the farm as
this practice constitutes the operation of an unpermitted landfill.
4. Any electrical services or devices such as recycle pumps, etc. around the lagoon
which will no longer be needed shall be disconnected at the power source and removed.
5. Upon completion of the removal procedures outlined above, the lagoon may be
a) filled in with soil
b) left intact and allowed to fill with fresh water for use as a fresh water pond
c) breached so that it will no longer impound liquid
If left for use as a pond, the requirements of Conservation Practice Standard 378 (Ponds)
shall be met.If the lagoon embankment is breached, the slopes and bottom of the breach
shall be stable for the soil material involved, but the side slopes shall be no greater than
3:1.
6. All disturbed areas shall be fertilized, seeded and mulched before the lagoon
closure can be certified.
Estimated amount of effluent/sludge: /,oz a&v 9ka Effluent/sludge analysis: /• 7
Total amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN): 17YG I6r.
The following acreage may be used for land application based on the crop to be grown:
Tract/Field #
Crop
lbs. N/ac.
Acres
lbs. N utilized
f lob
r-
/yy
23
331z.
ar
J Y
z Y
jqA_
T 'I b
r
S 7
r Zo8
Z(s
r
/1/4/
�Y77—
Yell!
WYLIar
/YV
2Z.
3r/�r

Affiliation: M&RPNr IrAMic.r ,2Mf
Address (Agency): 7.0. 4L, 7s9
r
Signature: 10

\-),- 0 le -A) 4, &�b

IYCDA A rononlic Division .4300.Rced Creels Ito;lci_:Ralci (1, NC::27ti07-6tiG5 919 :733-2G55 IQ .: •,,,.... , Rc
ort No: W01933'W
Grower. Triple S Farms & Cicanillg ColVes 7u:
USDA-NRCS-Duplin
715 East Main SI.
j .
Bettlaviile, NC 28518
_
-
aste Analysis Rollort Fann:
12/4/97
Duplin l;aun(y
Sample In6).
I.ahoratu "Ilcsulls parts cr niillilin tilitess'iHt[ci-wisc uulcd X :` :r
Srrur/ifs ll):
N
p A C71 A!S S N! A111 711 Gu 11
Alrr GI_ C
DK2
7ilfal 329 L
243 261 297 06 94.s 47.1) 4.02 15.5 .11.4, 0.17
7N -'N
Al L h1 Al Al M Al At At L
Waste Code.
-N119
ASS
-NO3
Na Ni cd I'll Al se LI pil SS ON
DAM CC.IN ALF.(! id)
82.9 7.27
Uescrlpllorr:
011-N
Swine La unn Sludge
I Urea
Al
Itccumu�cadatians.
'
Niitrieuts'Availablc'far hirsCCrn ' . .- � , s='JGs%1000'
Otl[ce Elcliients
lbs11000 allolls
Ipplrcalion Afelbod
N P205 X20 -C(I hlg .. - S PC AN 7.11 Cal B hfo Cl
Na Ni Crl
A Al So Li
Soil Inrurla
r
1.7 3.7 2 2 l} 0 97 0'G3 �: §U 3Z 0 03 ll tU: z 0 (l8 3 T Y
0 G9
Z -
- -

Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
Routine O Com laiaat O Follow!-u 'rif 1)IV ins action O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of .Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered P1 Certified © Applied for Permit E3 Permitted 113 Not Operational Date Last,Operated: .................
FarmName:......... ...... M'.............................................................. ..... Couttty:.... l Ptn.................................................................
. �rr 5b 8S
Owner Name:.................�et. yv .............. ....�-.4lur. ....... .' .....` .......................... Phone No:....4 ` i�i..�r. ..... •.. ••................................. r..... r....•
FacilityContact............................................................................... 'Title............................,.................................... Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ..... 5 ......�wth ....... 54orl .....:....:......................... ......... .............. ...... ......................... 36: i ........
Onsite Representative:..........1'�.Rn!.L�R...../.li0o . ......: ..................... ............................
4! Y�1.4,�t.............................................. integrator: ".�I�t1h(...
Certified Operator,_ ...........:..................:...................................:.........:... Operator Certification Number:,.................. ..............
Location of Farm:
f.* .... e_" .....4' ....a..:..SPti ...La , .�..,..1'1.�.... i. �,wT >...a .......... ......:R....................................................a................................................ A
.......................... .. ........... ... .. ..... IV
Latitude Longitude
€
Design
Current
„^ Design Current g Design Curren#
Swine
_ ..�. , .:.
Capacity
Population
Paul#iy
Ca acit Pa''ulatton Cattle ;; Cppuc�tyPopulatan
p- Y p
El Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish
LV 6
;$
❑Non -Layer
^:. ❑ Non Dairy
`
❑Farrow. to WeanME
,,
may.
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Othera
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
ElGilts
�'',.
:
Total SSLW
❑Boars
�,.
onds
of Laos IHoldm Y,
g g
❑Subsurface Drains Present
❑Lagoon Area
❑ Spray l geld Area
Number
g
❑ Na Liquid Waste Management System
x...<
nv
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 10 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at; ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [� No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ITI No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes 10 No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
7/25/47
Continued an back

Facility Dumber: 51 — 5Z
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
Structures (Lagoons.Iloldine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc',1
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure ? Structure 3
Identifier:
Freeboard (fl)� .......,............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes CO No
❑ Yes IM No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any otlier threats to the integrity of any of' the structures observed'?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate: minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type CEt^........... W1ru"A .......raynl .................... ............. Y!!1k1.4�..... ffr.6l�..........................
lb. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AW;M11)?
r
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or permitted Facilities Only.
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0 No.violatlons or deficiencies.were-noted•during this.visit.-.You.W'ill re'ceiveno ftirther
OerespQndence afioi�t this.visit.. '
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes
9 No
CR Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
iA No
❑ Yes
No
❑.Yes
No
❑ Yes
51 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes M No
❑ / Yes No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Comments`(Ofei to,question'lf): Explain any.Y'ES answers and/or atiy recommeridations or any other comments. 'r i
se:;drawings of facility to:better'explairi',situations. (use additional pages as necessary)..
f Z_ 15:rvslbr- arms S htluj d 6C .RIW aj (esttdej� &rr, a*jA 0 h 7 r ",- k(.t wa-U s-6 vtJ 0 e 1
z.z•m�
7125/97

�
_y�ub` ii(�#
Y
❑DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation 3Reviem
{
F
�
�D.WQ Animal Feedlot Operation SItelInspection
.
M1x
10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-u2 of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection S Q
Facility Number 3 Z
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: M Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel and processing
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: .............. . ..... ........... ....... ....... ........ ........ .......................... . ....... ..........................................
FarmName:...-5? r. A� 4..: #...... a +'? 5........................................................ county:..�.u.�..�. e.x................................... +.. Q
Land Owner Name: ........ A..'r V 1.�... ir.............. Phone No:...�..°i.Z.%).... �i.�.�.""..�,�.�.�..�...................
FacilityConctact:......................._......................................................... Title:................................................ Phone No: .... _....................................................
MailingAddress:...,R.,-.Q....... S-SA—its....... S.-o...r...Q..... d................. ..M.t........ Q.L......r....N..........................�.�..3..G.S
OnsiteRepresentative: .I?.0..an.,a.�r.�.�............. [t. ..x . .t ...r...Ji�....... Integrator;.....�" u..r...�..Sn.
Certified Operator: .—P.P.A!t•,G.Li,....61................ Operator Certifica tion Number:..... A(R...3............. .....
Location of Form:
Latitude • �46 Longitude • ©& ©11
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ]@ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? 1J IA,
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0 No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes I@ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes allo
maintenance/improvement? 4/3019'7 Continued on back

Facility Number: ...]....... „�...
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Ifolding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
...... I..... I......_... ..... ...... ............. ....... __.................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ®,No
❑ Yes RNo
Structure 5 Structure 6
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures Iack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste APPlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop hype ... A Y...m ............................ .............. � �) :�.�x7 .i...............................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22: Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes B No
❑ Yes ® No
[H Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes t9 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes t@ No
❑ Yes �3 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes �5 No
❑ Yes & No
❑ Yes 91 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #) Explain any YES answers'and/or any recommendations of any other comments
Use drawings of facili ' x to better explain situations: (use additionat gages as necessary) v s; x
12 . C u f v e3e. +-a. ti o�n o V., o V �--e.r l w 0. I 1 t a.4 J a LA_'._ tro w 0.0 of S) 4
2_4 . tin a V_t s „ 1--L �A i l,d ►n v F. ►r-��.o rd-s co Y-"e-S p e �( 41
�-i e.L b. v. v ,.,.. �S i r, Vwa-��... �e�ti 1L � "�-o�-►-• .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: S
cc: vivision of water Livality, water Vuality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4130/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Donnell Komegay
Kornegay Farms
320 Scott's Store Rd
Mt. Olive NC 28365
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Kornegay Farms
Facility ID#: 31-523
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Kornegay:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, �AW�
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 f C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmativ&Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

•
! Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: - , 1995
Time: .2 /,3
Farm Na
Mailing
County:
Integratc
On Site 1\GIJA G31_,UWU V F.
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation
Design Capacity:
r u V111-
Swine Poultry Cattle
Number of Animals on Site: %l /
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude:,°'_" Longitude: 2° tJ Elevation: Feet
l Circle @�or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: 2,.,--Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or 7N Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum set ck criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Y�e or No
100 Feet from Wells? 5or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes orc�
Is animal waste Iand applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map. Blue Line? Yes or N@o
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on -specific acreage with cover crop)? (Tyr No
Additional Comments:
Inspector Name
Signature
cc: Facility AssessmentUnit
Use Attachments if Needed.

aJ 1
Site Requires Imn�edtate Attehtion
;.
Facility Num er.
SITE VISITATION, RECORD'
DATE: — 3995
Owner:Ci CLI. . Farm Name:
1
County: _ ')cz
Agent "Visiting Site: r Phone:
Operator: Phone:
On Site Representative:' Phone:
Physical Address: `05
Mailing Address.
Type of Operation: Swine _LW- _ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: 0- ,
Latitude: ,.�a _ ' Longitude:
Type of Inspection: Ground �, / Aerial
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual .Freeboard: �_ Feet � Inches
For facilities with more than one lagoon, please address the other lagoons' freeboard under the
comments section.
Was any seepage observed from the iagoon(s)? Yes or Was there erosion of the dam?: Yes o No
Is adequate land available for land application?. Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
Fax to [phone]
of Agent

7 -,14 j f
M1R
Nov 1993
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management 4 '
Water Quality Section
�C .: .
If the animal waste management system for your feedlot opdrtion•.
is designed to serve more than or equal to 100 head of cattT8;-`75
horses, 250 swine, 1,000 sheep, or 30,000 birds that are served
by a liquid waste system, then this form must be filled out and
mailed by December 31, 1993 pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 (c) in
order to be deemed permitted by DEM. Please print clearly.
Farm Name: Kornegay Farms
Route 1
Mt Olive, NC 28365
Duplin County 919-658-5685
Owner(s) Name:
Manager(s) Name:
Lessee Name:
Farm Location (Be as specific as po sible: road names, I
directio milepost, vem:
c.): n O0 e
} S GD S n a 4A, H Al
V
Latitude/Longitude if known: QBSP # 16-122-17-25
Design capacity of animal waste management system (mber and
type of confined animal (s) : / ;?8d 57c,)/n_E
Average animal population on the farm (Number �nd typ of
animal(s) raised) : SOD , 1 !`'/h1.f I-cru
Year Production Began: + ffS ASCS Tact No.: V
Type of Waste Management System Usk:
A l/'d .�4.t- .O C..S/�')-n 04 )7C/ 7 /� A31�&uh .0koe- 0-12.
Acres Available for Land Ap lication of aste: craw
Owners} Signature(s): Date;
Date:
3—^3 (Randy Lane, Serviceman)

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural. Resources AAj1U*r*Aj.
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hint, Jr., Governor ®� F1
Jonathan B. Howes,, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 9, 1993
Donnell Kornegay
Rt. 1, Box 146
Mt. Olive NC 28365
Dear Mr. Kornegay:
This is to inform you that your completed registration form required by the' recently
modified nondischarge rule has been received by the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM), Water Quality Section.
On December 10, 1992 the Environmental Management Commission adopted a water
quality rule which governs animal waste management systems. The goal of the rule is for
animal operations -to be managed such that animal waste is not discharged to surface waters
of the state. The rule allows animal waste systems to be "deemed permitted" if certain
minimum criteria are met (15A NCAC 211.0217). �By submitting this registration you have
met one of the criteria for being deemed permitted.
We would like to remind you that existing feedlots which meet -the size thresholds
listed in the rule, and any new or expanded feedlots constructed between February ' 1, 1993
and December 31, 1993 must submit a signed certification form to DEM by December 31,
1997. New or expanded feedlots constructed after December 31, 1993 must obtain signed
certification before animals are stocked on the farm. Certification of an approved animal
waste management plan can be obtained after the Soil and Water Conservation Commission
adopts rules later this year.
We appreciate you providing us with this information. If you have any question about
the new nondischarge rule, please contact David Harding at [phone].
Sincerely,
,Steve Tedder, Chief
_. Water Quality Section
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Teiephone 919-733-7015 FAX.[phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer W% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Type of Visit: lotompliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Q�outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 4,., 4,3aAeparture Time: County:��/L Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: VC71WL Li�49 Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pap. Wet 1?oultry Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer I
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
I
INon-Layer I
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
1[) , PIL . it. Cs act P.o P.
Layers
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Qther
Other
Turkeys
Turke Poults
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [] Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes IffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes FNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters [:]Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: Date of inspection: ;�QZIZ]
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus stone storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes Z No
❑ NA
FINE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes &No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �_ r
Spillway?: _
Designed Freeboard (in): _
Observed Frecboard (in): _
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes P-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes 2] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes Tallo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes No
P
I —] NA❑
NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes _E� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes j2rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload [] Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes -fff No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes ETNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18, is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes L'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ;�t No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes O/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
[] WUP ❑Checklists [3Design [—]Maps [:]Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [Z No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 4 No
❑ NA [] NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
23, if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA [] NE
21412014 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of inspection: oIIV
124. ,Dia the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes KNo
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes A�j No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Z�No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes g'No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
ZrNo
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of.the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
0 No
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
;Z No
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
�,N0
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
7
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�'No
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or'any other comments.
Use.drawings of.facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessarv).
.51aK ex-'-
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
It 3 z.
a1-1 ,eF
Reviewer/inspector Signature:ze
Page 3 of 3
'/�''v/'3
Phone: q/a/ / VJ)6
Date: 30
21412014