310504_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
r
Department of Environmental Qual

1
'�<3 §�.C���1 Ill
AI I:t 11 I�� �h
of Water Quality
�'f •�E 4M•*�`w�� y's�����4"
Divtstari of Sot1 and Water Conservation.'
IO6.
..�.„rL nS'.r .I"AQ�l }y; �✓!" .. f�,l�r'
a
ther AgencyIlill"
,._ <. .. .:.H� .: .., � ail-+('.i �: �,.,.h ... .. k.!. '
+taftE IIti ,r
.�.. ,sl ��Si_nlfr�4�FK7:,.l i.:�.�.�'=�.:hi5`&�.1 M�.i
Type of Visit XCompliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: — --00 'rune: ® Printed on: 7/2112000
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted [3 Certified
� 3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: .......... 1.f.�.1rt1/.1..L 1.`.....C1IL2�.QL ......................................................... Count': ...... . ................................. ................ .......
.........
Owner Name:.. ......................
Facility Contact: ..............................................................................Title:.......
MailingAddress: ...................................................................................................
Onsite Representative ...... 1 t .� -F..
.....................................................
Certified Operator:,,,,,,,,,
Location of Farru:
Phone No:
Phone No:
.............................................:.............................
.............. ................. ........ ........ .... ..... ...................................... I ..........................
.......... Integrator:..... 1 �� ��
........ �^`�......................................................
Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
A,
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �� �� Longitude �• �' �"
Design Current
Swine C'.anarity Pnnulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
' 'D
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lawn Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made''
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
C. Il' discharge is observed, what is the estimated Mow in gal/min?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Su-uc;wre l Structure 2 Structure Structure 4 Structure 5
Identificr:..........................................................................
Freeboard (inches): T7
5100
❑ Yes XrNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes tpo
❑ Yes �<No
Structure 6
Continued on back

Fa�-ilVy Number: I — t1 Date of Inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, [:]Yes NfNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes 9No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes tg�No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 14No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ;KNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes )KNo
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes NfNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes kNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? WYes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
q yiolatigris:or ilt ficietictes r►ere noted d�trerig this;vasit; Yoo wi1l•teeON Rio fut er
corres oric�ence. about this 'visit.. • • ' •
❑ Yes ❑ No
,NrYes ❑ No
❑ Yes �(No
❑ Yes X'No
❑ Yes No
)(Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes to No
❑ Yes W40
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any.other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
❑ Yes kNo
❑ Yes O.No
❑ Yes U No
❑ Yes ZNo
ILO�
Ieyj
Ly
A
\J
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
7(0=39! =-3CIO a
Date: —GO 5/00

Ffkc.J;it.y Number: —S� Date of Inspection � Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge 5t/or hplow CKIes ❑ No -
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes kNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 9No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ,9FrNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover? ❑ Yes KNo
itiona ommen:ts and/or Drawings:
1� 0\7\C4-' V\P-L, I L'�O--W . � ��� yll\j mil- r� +� ti S� A.
�- Qk -1 cab C7"
Ct
J
5100

Division of Soil iadd,Waier Conse`rvhhonE' =Operation Re�iewi t "{' ':Ir ,1 '11 €!,
�:V].I� A ' .
.Division of oll and 1Nk
f FF i 1':`}I
S Water Conser�ahonl ¢ i compliance �I1spectloin r 11I I F ii1
i r`,iFt isiom of Water Qllallom Hance iris ectlon t t r 1a�'3'„f I' E it I- �I€�{b le t I I Iri.;a� tEs
�I -a I,,Y!i I i,tj l.:lii!I:;f ;Yi 1 li, P
E",
14PRoutine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review ()Other
1 .11 sill ilY. iillil��i ,+`
Facility Number I 'JI p Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection pp 24 hr. (hh:mm)
�] Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ....... liL{. 110D......�e ...5 rM.......................................... County:....... G� 41...........................
.�`�...
Q /
Owner Name :...........�iO..1.1�. A-6............... ;.ak-6-l%...Phone No:...
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
(' f� ,, /
Mailing Address: ........... . ... iK,%!? ....si Q... !J.. � ".✓.� frQt .��i.r................ ......I.. .....
/1- .....� ..... ....... ZS
Onsite Representative: ............. .....` ....... Integrator:...../..tll..�ll ,Ply r�7 ...,�l-... � S..................
Certified Operator........ ram{ 2)...... ��/ � !.................................... Operator Certification Number:..../16 1................
T --fin. nrFnrm-
..... ..:.f.l.......... R....�11................i..�.. .........C.S.f.......... ... .�?.....,..........la ....................
l�ro ......,5�.... 09A.1-....-......�� ..^...^I7.—��� ........IT .......Sri...... /. e� 1.^.-t-.....�/'tom
nfif.. A. I 2LL I 0 I f! , I [.L./ I.: T .nnar;f..r n I %7 1 • � I /JK Itc /� Q• 3 %}% � � 6AI Z"
Subsurface Drains Prest ❑ Lagoon Area
„
r old n onds So[oons - �° � :`_ .. .
en
l g d Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
�;j., :.
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water or the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon'system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Spray Field Area
f'
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3, Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): .........Y ..."................................................................................................................... .............................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes KNo
Structure 6
................... I.................
❑ Yes XNo
Continued on back
.•

Facjlity Number: — �p Date of Inspection
-,. 6. Arc there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenatce/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
,12. Crop type
mm�
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Rectuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the -Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes KNo
XYes ❑ No
❑ Yes P(No
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes k No
❑ Yes K No
❑ Yes 4No
ffidyes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes r(No
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
0� Rio violatioos'o� Oorfckoio -Wgre ilote(1• OjWirig this:visit: • Y:oo will•t;e'Oiye Rio fut�tiigr •
• • corres• oricier�ce: a�hut: this visit.: • ............... .. • .. . • . • . • . • . • .
- is '. EE" ^ 0.3 - 7 - e'f E a t 3 "'�A r' E �. -., E "'• F E 3 -Fis. a E f a39 3
Comments (refer to;'questiion #) Expiam any YEES answers andlor any,'recommendations ohanygother}comments
T.
Et $
�Usejdrawirigs of facility to better explain sttuat►onsEE'(use add><honal pages as necessary)' Ei E ��E i E
7. {d #ry Ve66-- -rl o^1 Aev1,1 s IAJAI&,R IJIK& U)A-a . VeUt--rA1-ribA)
141)S7- Be- Cdr A-A/D
6"Mobh /n/.Sf&Ab of ul1AIre-,8_ 2yr­ -iyfr Vj///rm IZY5-
A-G Ohl 4_S
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: f ,�r+� Date: f/ /8
3/23/99

Facility Number: 31 — Q Date of Inspection
r- Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes xNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes P(No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes j No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or y� .
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes �J No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes(�\No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? xYes r❑� No
lIt ona ' onments an , or `, ., rawings v ' 3i ,.k ` ; rr tI l., l Si c T.
�7 • 49eo1y,1n O-1VP
FI L-C PIPC"r
OR-
ALI

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
September 15, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Donald Pickett
Muddy Creek Farm
1298 Jacksons Store Rd
Beulaville NC 28518
Farm Number: 31- 504'
Dear Donald Pickett:
AZT?
0 •
N.CDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Muddy Creek Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the
attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular
Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mai1 Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Susan Cauley at [phone] extension 546 or Brian
Wrenn with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
ZT.Stevens
l
for
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Wilmington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Date of Inspection 71�is 9R
Facility Number 3l Sb " Time of Inspection 20 24 hr. (hh:mm)
g Certified © Applied for Permit 0 Permitted © Not Operational Date Last Operated:..
0 Registered Ccr 1� -'' ,,,,,,
Farm Name: t.. t^1��.......�c....rr,tares........................... County:..,....�L�hf,...............................................................
.......................
Owner Name :..................:..... °+ O...............�::t: ��.................. Phone Na: �.�.i[��.� f � �.3I�.1..................... ............................ .... ..........
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address i.... `
Onsite Representative: .......... Dp.1k�b.---.?ak.L.T......................................................... Integrator: .......M.V4ay .......
I................
Certified Operator:...............................:............................................................................... Operator Certification Number :.........................................
Location of Farm:
vt-.... 4 5.%... � ?r.....p .......Y, .1. . a...f� :' .. tn,1R�...... ;k i3�..4.......sp— .!..Y!............................................................................. �
.......................... .....
General
L Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 10 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Ep No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what'is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes MNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes &0 No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ri Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Number: 31 — sp
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laeoons,[fold ing Ponds, flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (11):............2_3..............................................
10. is Seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
❑ Yes [A No
❑ Yes [9 No
Structure 6
❑ Yes [SNo
❑ Yes M No
12, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? Yes ❑ No
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13, Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes CgNo
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes N No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
1t
15. Crop type .....................: . Y.1�U�.S.........................................................! AA.%N................................................................................... ..
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMII)? ❑ Yes allo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
PO No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
[O Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes
(� No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
( No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
Yes
❑ No
Fcir rertitied_or_Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
25,
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit"
❑ Yes
No
0 No.vio'lations or deficiencies were note'd-during this.visit..Y.ou will receive no further
' correspondence aihoitt this. visit...... , .
Commenfs (refer to question #) E�tp1 in tiny"YES answers and/or"any recommendations oi any other comments.' ,
llse drawings of facility to better`explain :Situatiims '(use additional pa;Es .rs necessary)
L_0.Soanw.nt`'+ej ` y J 1 •
�o q�' m"J-J S1�o[:�A �M�'Lt� X) rcoc.t
�5 Ncor� _% Savo kLk . � (�'"� ?—OL 1 USA f
O�.��a. ckW�O►C`1�t� n� 1�"0 k tvr� )0rilA1'1C4S.
Cc- (1�V'or-- X0��7�
YSk� ShOU�I� be Wti rm. rtcwt}S, M�.:1 a roo ra�i �+ d0,jo,4a
M-7 CeLdin J Z>" ex+•
[,tl:,v,+n�Or, JVC Zed 7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name A„L" 0r w.r�
Reviewer/inspector Signature: HAZ _1—, N Date:

Jok Routine 0 Complaint O Follow—up of DWQ inspection O Follow -tie of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number 1 50 Time of Inspection t :OA 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: IffRegistered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:.1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel and lrocessin
❑ Not Operational Date Last. Operated:
Farm Name: ..... Aikd.ry-U..xku. L..... :?.!Y1....... ..... .».........................
County:...10.4..........._................
.. i.y..� � .
Land Owner Name: ,,..,�„ ,. ....
tear .l?� ....
+ �`r._ ...............................
l
Phone No: �........ .�.
.0_ Z r.3.�'f
.„
Facility Conctact:
Title;
Mailing Address:... .r. ...-T ......�26.!....ld...........................
Onsite Representative:..��,..A� /................... K.4.!!.I.....................................
CertifiedOperator: ......... ..........2.1.................52.M.S................................
Location of Farm:
........................... Phone No:.......................................................
gM�.�................................. s :4.......
Integrator:.......itlC.PY..................................................
Operator Certification Number: ..... 1W..
W.. . ............... I
..�?xs....Sxt.y.t........�.i...........4 �.S..�I.S........r.. .�:�-o.�i..�,�:. ......... .... :..:( .....r.►�a.�.e...i..... xx,.....�r,►{o�.nrb�..e� ..r1.�-a.. 4
,w ►. ..... s Q �.g........ ..... ......4.....� �n. .�: �:.at.... ................................................... ....... _.............. ..........................
.... �y
Latitude Longitude ©• ® ®
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes JR No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes $j No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes El No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? 1�Q
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes KNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®,No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes IRNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes a No
maintenance/improvement?
4/30/97 Continued on back

Facility Number: ..aA......_ ..'�T..-
G Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes R No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and(gr Holding Pon"
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
........ .Th........... ............................
Structure 4
❑ Yes 91 No
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes I&No
Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
ff No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
ENo
12, Do any of the structures need maintenance improvement?
aYes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
KNo
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
EffNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type I.a :v..:�.l.:fisO .................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
KNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
KNo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
1. Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For C-edfied-Eacilities Only
❑ Yes
® No
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
K Yes
❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
19No ,
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
Comments (refer to'question #).g Explam'any YES answersand/or any recommendatuons'or any oilier corr`iments: ;�- x€a
Use drawings of facility to betterexplaun situations {use additional pages as necessary} 'G T riu ;
IZ C a t V u �; e d o �f ►.►y b w n ,,..ate.-- W a t i 0 4
IS • C.O r r-e- C� w e e.X r +-b b l �.v,.� �• s rNj ' , Q t� Lq
2. C erg t`e r` rn v 3 1✓ a1�w
S i i -e • Du r t r a � i S ti 4--.s b 4 c J_j a t LA..)
V,
V, Q__� � � a. � l a b l ".
NA 0. s v r-#_ a� �� �-t v b_�-.r. IDS a r► i v r . Jo a �� o ,.t v`R'�-o'.-o(S . _
i f o v i• a -,.� 60 C.o--K- {-i +n v. ,ra_ Z r y, w. Q k2 S It c S
,. y cn•-� �,v-�; ��` i 4 1 f a b 2 S %J M-e o —L--b I'y t
I
Reviewer/Inspector Name 6 Nt =>�nfts
71115.51.0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:.k.A j Date: 1
cc: Division of water guattry, water Vuattty J'ection, Pacttity Assessment Unit 4/3U/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Donald Pickett
Donald Pickett Farm
1298 Jacksons Store Rd
Beulaville NC 28518
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Donald Pickett Farm
Facility ID#: 31-504
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Pickett:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, W 4.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 fC An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 1 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. 7
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
. ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner:---
Mailing Address:
County: 6141b',11-
Integrator: Phone: l ,A-0 d D VI - a t / °!
On Site Representative: fir; c<< +ae rri� j Phone:
Physical Address/Location: AL 10Y S U _
Type of Operation: Swine '� Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: l a.l u Nee)Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude:° 5l ' q I" Longitude: _i 7 ° u 4 C3 Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) �e or No Actual Freeboard: Ft. f�— Inches
• Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or
Is adequate land available for spray? or No Is the cover crop adequate? es r No
Crop(s) being utilized: l' a3l--Q- {
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Vs or No
100 Feet from Wells? es r No .
•
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No .
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or V� If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes o , a
Additional Comments:
+ Ca Rw (°,c7N
Inspector Name
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.