310499_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

f i
14-
ual�
C6'A enC Water Conse'rYailon it 9
.' '�k., I Othsion of Sotl.and1�; "I'I
tvts�on o a er
g _v
a rs. a i Y rri U� a� n I v
d.
,h34'�r..�r.F.•e� s�.0 1. -"t_� s ... .Y _..._.. .- .e.. :X.�.� _ _ ... ._ _u .i .-. i�5 n..c'..-. {Z., sis..r s ,.:.:i .,-.... u
Type of Visit t&Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit (� Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number {
Date of Visit: t io vZ 't'unc: Q1 Printed on: 7/21/2000
0 NNat Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted [3Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....................
................... .............. y:.............. .i.m....................
Farm Name: /+ .....,...,. ..........�C.!+.4s�"......��.��.��........�uf� count + .......................
Owner Name: ...... &e5f ;... �f....... ! Yan4v...,1.%!........................... Phone No. ......._....................................
FacilityContact: ................................................. ............................. Title :................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: .............................................. ...............
Onsite Representative:..., J�LG......�Q.,!hyhCe
Certified Operator : ................................................... ......
Location'of Farm:
........... ................ I................... Integrator: ........ '.l'1,1�✓fll h
x..............
................ I ................ ............. Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �� �_. �•� Longitude •
Design Current
Design Current Resign Current
F�.,,, .ry :. I :.; ..:: Ca' aci Po ulation
poultry
Ca' aci Po ulation Cattle .. , ... Ca` c� ,::'I'e elation
4,
Wean to Feeder
Layer
Dairy
°� I
i,:C,
Feeder to Finish
ZZ�
❑Non -Layer
❑Non-Dairy
Esa
,Q sty
c
W
Farrow to Wean
'
;,SC5F;ji
Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
-
;`ai
Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
Gilts
� =
Boars
Total.SSLW'
4.31
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System"
Discharges & Stream Im acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: [ILagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance: man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated (low in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ........................ .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches):
5100 Continued on back

Facility Number: Date of Inspection [�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a weitabie acre determination? ❑ Yes G No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0.. ? Yi tQ�s off' d0f jejejm0ie$ *re �Ofe#• OjWi4g 4bjs:vjs}t; - Yoji vt jtj-teeoiye 0o fufther . .
. • corresao deitci abaut this visit . ................................. .
bC l�Li�� i5 �/YCk4itl� �it/ 7�t .S><4fG '4
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes. ❑ No
l4ePr f,Je►�e
hf7 116�i
Diti 5��� �OcoeDdC✓ 7�c- yrouk4s awe r/car.> kSerG -M r41S-c- e411A.
lu'q
e 160 not
ietn e PAPA �oor� ��' Q 5
e�7�
off- ye,
AL
Reviewer/Inspector Name �' # + 'je} +i `Pu E s: ./1» #<;qj� M d aS r, , r r i -
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: F Date: h;z 5/00

Facility Number: Date of Inspection J/ Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues`"`"'
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge allor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments an or. Drawingps:
J
5/00

Name of Farm/FaciIity
Location of Farm/Facility
Owner's Name, Address
and Telephone Number
Date of Inspection
Structural Height, Feet
Lagoon Surface Area, Acres
Upstream Slope,xH:iV
Embankment Sliding?
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
Seepage?
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
Erosion?
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
Lagoon Dike Inspection Report
:�2IZ 1 1)CTO
(a-.oAn u , 1W .
Y (�
2?1K Names of Inspectors.:Z�
D Freeboard, Feet ? �-
r
] 1 Top Width, Feet G
Z '%. ( _ _ Downstream Slope, xH: l V
Yes ----No
Yes No
Yes No
Z'. 1
Condition of
Vegetative Cover
(Grass, Trees)
- r
Did Dike Overtop? �es No If Yes, Depth of Overtopping, Feet
Follow -Up Inspection Needed? Yes No
Engineering Study Needed? Yes No
Is Dam Jurisdictional to the Dam Safety Law of 1967? Yes No
Other Comments -C-,P,6co�4 I S

5,
Lagoon Dike Inspection Report
Name of Farm/Facility
Location of Farm/Facility _ ��0-0
Owner's Name, Address
and Telephone Number
Date of Inspection 2� Names of Inspectors
Structural Height, Feet Freeboard, Feet ! Z
G r
Lagoon Surface Area, Acres L_l Top Width, Feet
Upstream Slope,xH:1V _ _ Downstream SIope, xH:1V Z . !
Embankment Sliding? Yes -No
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
Seepage? Yes No
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
Erosion? Yes No
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
Condition of 6. 0�6S
Vegetative Cover
(Grass, Trees)
Did Dike Overtop? z-1-y"es No If Yes, Depth of Overtopping, Feet Z
Follow -Up Inspection Needed? Yes ---' No
Engineering Study Needed? Yes -�No
Is Dam Jurisdictional to the Dam Safety Law of 1967? Yes No
Other CommentsCo

p
,p
Division of Soil and Water Conservatrori - O(ieratioii ReviewA
Divips�yipoyyn ofSoil and Water Copn{serva�ti�o�((yyn - Co��ttipliance Inspe
p Routine p Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up o review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Tine.of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Perinitted MCertified p Conditionally Certified p Registered in Not Operattona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Ernest.Gxady.Farmxady-Eacm .................................................................................... County: Duplin WIRO
OwnerName: Ernest .................................... Grady ......................................................... Phone No: 91d:296-41d8.7...........................................................
Facility Contact: ..................................................................... .Title: .. Phone No:
Mailing Address: 694.Saxecta.Rd..................................................................................... Kemattsville... NC ................................................. - 28349 ..............
Onsite Representative: ................................................................................ ......................... Integrator.Mutrµhy..Farmily.Farims......................................
Certified Operator:Ernst.C......................... Gtrady................ ., I 1.7.8,40 .............................
...... .............................. Operator Certification Number: ..
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®• ®° ®�� Longitude ©' ©� ®,,
Swine . Capacity Population
p Wean to Feeder
® ee er to finis
1
p arrow to can
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
Design Design Current,
g urrent g
Poultry Capacity 'Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ airy
p Non -Layer ❑ on- airy
p Other
Total Design Capacity , 1,224
Total SSLW
411
Nurnber,oFLagoons` ��------���� ❑ u sur ace rains resen ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray re rea
Imo,.
Holding Ponds / Solid TrapsE ❑ a LiquidSystem jr
Waste Management
Dischal, & Stream Inmacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Yes 0 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon p Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, nol ify DWQ) ❑ Yes p No
c, if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes []No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes []No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection &. Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
ldent i I icr:
Freeboard(inches): ...............24...............................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, []Yes p No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

111
facility Number: 31_499 Date of Inspection
6. Are therestructures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? / []Yes []No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvenkEnt? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
[]Yes
[]No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
❑ No
12.
Crop type
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
Cl No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Cl Yes
❑ No
16.
1s there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
p No
Itequir•ed Records & Documents ,
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
p No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
❑ No
G:.N. i6Jl tions:or:deficiencres.wereuoterlduring:this'visit.'-You.ivill.i:eireivenafurther.
. � �cor�esnandence: aboirf this:visit: •................................... .
urricane Flovd Assessment with DLQ I
ufficient freeboard available. Lagoon did overtop and depth of overtopping is about 2ft. Lagoon is near the river. The area
ooded and therefore the dike flooded also to approx. 2ft. No damage to dike walls was observed. Grass cover is good on dike.
Water on dike wall)
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

1
J%Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Permitted OCertified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 10 Not O erational Date LLast Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: ��.. County ...........�P..l�l...,.................................................
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No:
Facility Contact:..............................................................................Title:
MailingAddress:. .................................................
Onsite Representative: G
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
.... Phone No:
.......................
..........Integrator:................................................
Operator Certification Number:,,,,,,,,,,,
... .. J
Latitude ' ` « Longitude ' 6 «
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'!
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Il' ycs, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: 3 s /
Freeboard (inches): ........................
❑ Yes Ki
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes O�No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �f No
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes XNo
Continued on back

4
Facility Number: — q Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ E�xicessiiv..e1Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type Lp , �� . �/L-i� C"GL• , (,J 1 5_01-7
13. Do the receiving crops diffef with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17.• Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. 'Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20: Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time.of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
yig1;a H}njs:ojr ftiFJcle cie wire Qtedd(x`iiag �� s:visptf Yoh► will �eegiye o fftber
eorr46iri fence: aboiit: this visit: :: :
T7}�v�,��
❑ Yes �5(No
6fYes ❑ No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes ( No
❑ Yes ❑ No
19Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes JXNo
❑ Yes OfNo
❑ Yes NfNo
❑ Yes lgNo
❑ Yes J�rNo
❑ Yes 4No
❑ Yes krNo
❑ Yes t9 No
❑ Yes 0'No
❑ Yes IVNo
❑ Yes 0 No
Reviewer/Inspector Name E's `i'JE� 6_,74T u, [�� ,. n"�i ;l; e ,1 a 3 l '"' Ir v
•i V % ..
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ���Q— Date: ��Q
r.11

Facility Number: Date of Inspection Q
Oder Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes kNO
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application'? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes RNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 4No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes eNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes WNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes XNo
itiona,Addl Comments and/or. rawIn s:
...�-:f,

Division of Soil and Water Conservation Operation Reviewf , , ;
',9�f3t HI.
r ' f,, , ODtvrsion of Soil and Water"Conservation ComphancelInspectton
Division of Water QiRality F€ Complaance InspeCt,Qn
0^S`'i ,:y r ii ,' , 6't.,, r l f l -., i , �t it
Other Agency- Operation.Rev�ew
Jq
10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow -tip of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection Em
Time; of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted Certified Q Conditionally Certified © Registered E3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: p�
Farm Name: ...... lr.....67k, . ...... ................................. County:......L..r r��/../Y...........................lrT ! 1...
OwnerName:......... % ....S.a.z}............................................nn............. Phone No:.....1..1a....... L .... ..............................
Facility Contact:.......�!.............. ........... ........................ Title: ........ tlr!`%le Phone No
...............................................................................
Mailing Address: ..... 6:,1Y......d/t ze,7-A..........,........I....................... ...... rc 71r 4/Y&Y1..ff�:!C.......+i! le,e .......... 40 .....
Onsite Representative:.......4 �?...................................... Integrator:............... %A Lf...................�^ .................
Certified Operator:....... �„Ahq.r.............!... Uperator Certification Nuu�ber:..........................'...``................
7f �J
Location of Farm:
41%f.c..... 1..-�-T.r�,T.rlr,.=_.rr......�.f��r..►l ;c.,....Cy.....................!�...... /-&/.....,....e:.-z—c.. ........................ .,
..- . a............,.9.z.-7 �......t ✓..., �.....N...........
. .......Ao ........ aE-.............. ,V
Latitude �• ®" �`° Longitude • 4
Design
De , Current;
Current sign
Design Current '
Swine Ca achy
Po ulation Poultry Ca 'actt Population Cattle .
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer ❑Dairy
Feeder to Finish
ZQ : ❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
t
Farrow to Finish
t Total Design Capa�i'ty
%ZZ
❑ Gilts i
�:.
r - , e_ •'
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
1245 2=0
Number of.Lagoons'.
�• ;; ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding€Ponds /, Solid Traps
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
,
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ElLagoon [ISpray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is ohserved, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. ]f discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min`?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system:? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? -AIRRIC, -tV& FLV,D
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ........ D..............................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes x No
❑ Yes KNo
Structure 6
❑ Yes PxNo
Continued on back
3/23/99

Facility Number: �f — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
W,lste application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type 69A-ST/tZzgML,04 iC y _ I�
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
vi91'ai" dericaertctes -were notpd• 0(W fig 41kis'AsIC- ;Y;oi} will •teegiye OQ #`. thgr. - ;
Co�rres� 6ndertce: abauf this visit .. ' ' ' ' : ' : . .
rawtngs of fac 4l ,to r6,L-tter explain`situattons (use'additionali pages as necessary)
9, Le&cvm1»6fib S6E-bln/C G. t"WAI a)11-11 tV2A,V w44-�7_6- .
❑ Yes,,XNo
❑ Yes No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes -k No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes hrNo
❑ Yes %4 No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes 4 No
❑ Yes $ No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes YW No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes tNo
o
❑ Yes
, le"!, i!
Z~61i LURE �Ci/,�l`'I 7,�J2�n/C� �i%ll��fCit-s✓ FGOY� f/A
AAlb /k/A-S Alal Yef ,er-_,caVa€- , SPRR9 i'A? oa+/ jZ .��i✓';
r.. ,.- •r- �... ,_1)^s�A�,,�,r�..,. ...�y... g .,..�.,..F"_',.'."'. i t s C' -r~< rr-
Reviewer/Inspector Name 1i f1-1IG Fir1T�f�rftr.r�r f , , 8 3tri#' r t f % fi'1p . �,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. ,l. / — Date: 7/ /- rjl
I&
3/23/99

Date of Inspection f I
Facility Number: —
Ptlor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
4No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
XNo
2&
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shu(ters, ctc.)
❑ Yes
No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
j No
32.
Do the Flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
XNo
AdditionalComments an Or' ' rpwings:-,' . �.<<u:€ , j- � ,�...�.a.,
J
i
3/23/99

E3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
® Division of Water Quality
q Date of Inspection
Facility Number
- Time of Inspection :®e 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered ® Certified 13 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted Q Not Operational Date Last Operated:
..........................
FarmName: ...... Fi.. ftA.....Ga.�.... `"4K.. ..................................................................... County: ... Qf. kjc........ ,........................................................
Owner Name: ....... �iv,vuS{ C .....&M4 Phone No: ... G,9il0�.L94.-SK7�T................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:
MailingAddress: ......o` ..............................................................................................................2�J.!�i
OnsiteRepresentative: ........ �1! �....... %.M............................................................. Integrator: ....../.Y�1a.p�tµ..............................
r.^,.........................
Certified Operator:..........................................__................................................................. Operator Certification Numbert...................� ....................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? .
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes '® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes G9 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 1P No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 55 No
❑ Yes C9 No
❑ Yes 0 No
Continued on back

Facility Number:3 I —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagouns,lfoldine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2
Identifier:
......................................................................
Freeboard(ft): ............. ......................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 3 Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
.........................................................................................
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? El Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) j
15. Crop type.......6.elcY]n.U.tiw............ �.P.'%TT....... �xAnSrs........................ C..D:.K ............. d� At .............. 1! .J ftA..:....,................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ® Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
LN No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
W Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
R3 No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
,M Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
91 Yes
❑ No
0 No vio'litions•ar d'idencies were note-d-during this;visit: You'will recei've•iz611irther':
c6rrespotidence about this'visit'.
C6"&ii (refer,tolt#ESa�s,wesnalor ii44eomi6ndationno(quesion olmme°
if siMUIVII
�15C dt gs, 6lf�lTkilttyA belt& 6kplalll 51tl1Rtt0115 �qSC ilddltiUIIal<p e5 dS fl@C�iSAC. '�
�,� '
,:. ,a r �w� k w .,.
E L. O'ke r j i `A W11 (-I k S a
` t�—� �W`-OfAi
tlo• �e. �^r�.OwC1 tj tp i,h rlll[l� �Qiipl� tpV' .Z COrk L 6p �cp.y. la�lt]ri• �fGPtlr CYOAS SIta+I�
� Aobz..
Plc►t. C3 Latta�Pt
iW4 or I(,,r Si-a�(� Ix. c ej. A11 �+
`
nnp
IV.N" cw, to K�� I
, At' 1R411" Form s6i)16e,&ti_
22. S� rv,,j Kcov4,_ slrwA Im— lG t�� IvY put, �- 4tv►vnlw.- k Zold
Qlk ow� to \. W , _h\ I'CC'o0+� l SErta4c� 6Q 47-va air-)"P Im" it,
�1eNkN j
00_!,vrr�tL��1t1�1r{ cN._ Or, jVr4�d 1'v' �iAr. �o�S 4hobVSt3 S�ecl�il6e
p.Cvt Je \pe. �)_"1
f
fi�dln t �n�0.TVol` M�� S6VQ V'. Im f
J��Sr
.,s. DeJ in 1r}NXA. Cc-yr-G %% 4.ot11U 4. Pa OP Fvj*'�j 7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name k
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z(

E t Y
°.
❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Opera801
VW
tion Review
r;
-.:,
�., DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation S1teInspect>ton
ON
ON
■W II1YIllr�llr�ll
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DW2 inspection Q Follow-up of DSNVC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number ^^.
Time of Inspection I f 24 hr. (hh:mm) `
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review r
Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: ...... . ....................... . . ..... . ....... . ........................ . ................ . ........................ . . ........................
FarmName: ........ 61'.tiG...... Caa4....... Fci,! k.................... ......... _ ... ....-........................ County:.»»�s.�lrh...... ...... ....... _.......... .... »»..... »»..........
LandOwner Name:... %i .....-&IY.�............................................ W....»»............... Phone No:...-(. ...1.��.Z��v.:.���?....».......».............................
Facility Conctact:... F.�]'►......3i.. .. >...................................... Title:..Ja6tae Phone No: L1A_ 9A:.4_x.%.................
MailingAddress:.......(ie.�. .... t&a ..........` ......................................................................................... ..... .w i........
OnsiteRepresentative: ... A&K, & ......... J�.......................................................... Integrator :......... ......... »............tt.........��.........................
CertifiedOperator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number: ....1 11wo ...................
Location of Farm:
s EMc--�I� Ica
Longitude ' ®+ © LG
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes [% No
❑ Yes [Z No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes P No
aA
❑ Yes [X No
[:]Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ;&No
❑ Yes 91 No
Continued on back

Facility Number:..........—.qm....
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (LAZoons and/or Holding I?ondsl
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
.3 ........... ........... .......... - .... ............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes ;R No
❑ Yes B No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(1f any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Rule Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......... CA ..&I........".Jo.................................... ....................... C'mrs.......... ....................................
,
16, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19, Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes $CNo
WYes ❑ No
❑ Yes ff No
[:]Yes ZNo
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes jR No
❑ Yes . P No
❑ Yes Q9 No
❑ Yes 29 No
❑ Yes 4@ No
❑ Yes CR No
❑ Yes ®.No
PYes ❑ No
Comments,{ref er to,giiestion''#) Explain any YES answers`and/or;any recommendations or any;other comments ? -
Use drawings of facility;to better explain situations (use taddrtional.pages as necessary)
(Z• I^ ocAcr w45 a� � aor� SInOdIl� Iae Wuj• exc�:o� G j S-669 6G Aft"a Gull- 4
z�}. S�r.„y veot-dg skwid 6e j4p� Iftl rok nuv%6y- sAJ 4,e(d number. U�&4t.t} sc ( c"J
wo,SVe. %�O�j ke- 4rr_iGx. baO " o+ ►�� ,,%6►� runs ti h �+ cf dS,
e- COLMU A
LaacT LS T-4,
s iYt) N_UX- � ft,e l► WA S kt- ftjt - by S:�L. S� �tef c . ICE at
cc: utvtston of water j!uaury, water Vuatuy Iectton, Pacruty Assessment Unit 4/3U/97

•
0.
Site Requires Immediate Atten ' n: 4-t
Facility No. ��
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: �� , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: t''� S�' C G` -a
Mailing Address: C.9(4- SCL Y�z'
Ksv . l (e • PJC Zg Z
County
Integrator: v -,('e 11 Phone:
On Site Representative: fiG S w,; Phone: 2?L r oo
Physical Address/Location: t..Sk L700 °3 • s ►� : �a� }
L1_ li
Type of Operation: Swine - Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: I Z 2-4- Number of Animals on Site: ' " 1 2.2 ¢ ^T
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: �"� Longitude: �7 3 J " Elevation: Feet
^ Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches)�or N
Was any seepage observed from the
Is adequate land available for spray`.
Crop(s) being utilized:
o Actual Freeboard: Z Ft. 'Inch
)? Yes o1Q Was any erosion observed? Yes o No
No Is the cover crop adequate? es r No
! • . A
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwelling Yes r No .
100 Feet from Wells? es r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? -Yes 1V`0
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters he state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices?. Yes o o If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreag th cover crop)?. Yes
wi
Additional Comments: C ,s 5
•' W,,�� ,
Inspector Name -
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.