310471_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

Type of Visit 0 ;Routine
'pliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notiiication O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 3 ! Date of Visit: Tune: /DO
NNot rational O Below Threshold
0 Permitted © Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date -Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Y'.�. S V Z' 1, 1/A A m . County: _._ _ . DJPIIJ _. __ .......
Owner Name:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: ___
Facility Contact: _ .. _ __ Tittle:._
Onsite Representative:.S V__--
Certified Operator.. _ ..
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator. _
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • < 66 Longitude • 4 Du
De' F_ . Curreat
$Wi
ne C'anar�fvPneinlafinn.,..ip�V -af ararity MPnsuilaitini:- _. �e
Wean to Feeder
Layer
Feeder to Finish
Non -Layer
Farrow to Wean
Other
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Z
lam('
V
)d
To1;De5i
�: 7
Gilts
Boars
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Strucutre 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ..... % _ 7—
Freeboard (inches): Liq 15
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
Structure 5
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 3 — Date of Inspection
. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ❑ No
closure plan?
(I€ any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/impmvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancefimprovement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ❑ No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? [:]Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below [j Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.
' � ��, pqS� r ❑ Feld Copy ❑ Final Notes
FA p-M, tg P"c_ - .S of 661*/4 (36L&)4'P aVr nrb fX(, S FO,- YEA A, �
r4Ai::-. (,A 6-66a C LOS( ,LT #,J(-,Etas To 036 D Od&, c,,c,,j6pyLCp Fox.
,�e AS:)d& 2,6_-rs% VPTT.L CUS6 01-'I UM PLE TES rAW,7 T4)6L' LAGoVJ
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,
: _ _. -
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:QZ"Date: jjq

Facility Number: .r Date of Inspection
Aeyuired Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Oe/ WUP, checklists, design, reaps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No
27_ Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
29. Were any additional -problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, slip questions 31-35) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes ❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint. O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 31 471 Date of Visit: 2/15/2002 Time: 10:09
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...
Farm Name: W1RJ.*jA5M AYAAJF8.rM.......................................................... County: V_Ujd10..................................... WIRO......
Owner Name: 1'E IRem--------------- - �ulliyao _ _.---------------------- Phone No: 9J2_�5$= 1$-- - -------------- ----- -
Mailing Address: I.tAl�l.h[Ix�Al.�i...................................................................... Mt,.A1aXg..MC........................................................ Z8365 ..............
Facility Contact: ...........................................................Title:..................................... Phone No.
OnsiteRepresentative: �iT,a0Sl1�[r�._3'Y3EURJIL%�uUiY3U1----------------- Integrator:Ia�tdent------------------------ ---•
Certified Operator:lllilliam.0............................ sallina ............................................ Operator Certification Number: 2.QI3.1 .............................
Location of Farm;
North of Summerlins Crossroads. On West side of SR 1505 approx. 1 mile North of SR 1500. Turn left at mailbox along Ion j
tirt drive to the brick house back from the road. T
N Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F35 ' F 08 6 12 Longitude 77 • 57 12
-Design Currept
Swine _ "
Ca acr -Po ulation
'`Poultry C'
❑ Wean to Feeder
- ❑ Layer
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
10 Other
® Farrow to Finish
200
_
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
- -
Design.. Current
i_ Cattle Ca`aci ::Population
1 ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
.-
200
- - --- ---
Number:of Lagoons` 2 IN Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area INSpray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid_Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System "
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (.If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d• Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ® Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 5
Identifier: ............. I ------------- ------------- Z------------ -
Freeboard (inches): 19.5 20

v�iwivl I.ORIlrruCU
,, Facility Number: 31-471 Date of Inspection 2/15/2402
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? N Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps,,etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
N Yes ❑ No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Com menEc {refer�toq ton {Explain any�YES answ nd/or any recomneendat�o_ns or any other comments
Use drawings of facil tyo tte reYplan tuat�ons(useadditionsl pages s nec se sary)�� Field Copy ❑ Final Notes I�' W k
-�_..:���� �x� .'.may-.r.,��,.--��-,m. a-•�rn ..�
4. Lagoon I is at 18.5 inches at the time of inspection. There is a wet mark on the lagoon gauge, lagoon inner wall, and wood supports i
_
e lagoon that shows a recent drop in the lagoon liquid level of about 9 inches down to the current level. The records show the Sullivans
pumped on 2/11/02 and the Sullivans said that they pumped on 2/14/02 for about 7 and a half hours. I asked Mr. Sullivan if the lagoon
level was up at the top of the wet mark prior to the pumping on 2/11/02 and he said that it was. This means the lagoon level was such that
lagoon 1 had 9 and one half inches of freeboard prior to the pumping on 2/11/02. Pictures were taken of the lagoon marker and
surrounding area.
7. Saplings need to be eliminated from the inner and outer walls of lagoon 2. Also, trees and woody vegetation needs to be removed from
ithe inner wall of lagoon 1 near hog houses.
Reviewer/Ins ector Name _ -
P Stonewall=Mathes, --.� _
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: Z 15 O

05/03/01
Continued
• Facility Number: 31-471
Date of Inspection 2/15/2002
Odor issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ® Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ® Yes ❑ No
8. The wall of the catch basin on the hog house next to the waterway needs to be built up such that all waste is contained in the waste
management system. Also, it appears that rain water is being diverted into the lagoon via a pipe by the same hog house next to the
waterway; rain water needs to be diverted away from the lagoon.
11. The records are not complete; there is no flow rate given on the IRA-2's, thus records have not and cannot be completed without
roper flow rate. Thus, it is difficult to determine whether overapplication of PAN or hydraulic overloading has occurred.
ALSO, the waste utilization plan does not address hydraulic loading rates; plan needs to be updated to address this.
3 and 15. See 4 25.
4. The facility needs to have a wettable acres determination completed with a waste utilization plan written to match and the record
needs to be done accordingly.
8. Need to fill out insect and odor control checklists. Need to have any lagoon design and/or lagoon volume check information that
tay be available for the lagoons.
9. The IRR-2's have not been calculated out; there is no flow rate shown on the IRR-2's. Mrs. Sullivan indicated that arrangements
ad been made on more than one occasion to determine the flow rate, but it had never been done. There is no flow rate on the
RR-2's from the present records back to at least 1999. Only the date and times with total minutes and 1 sprinkler are shown on the
RR-2's. As noted above this makes it difficult to determine whether overapplication of PAN or hydraulic overloading has occurred.
'he flow rate needs to be determined and used to calculate the records.
The onsite representatives told me that application had occurred on 2114/02 from about 1430 to about 2200; this event is not
in the records.
Animal waste was applied to soybeans on 6/29/01 and there is no waste analysis dated within 60 days of this event as required.
Soil sample results for field 2 were not able to be viewed at the time of the inspection; grower apparently had a 4/2001 result for
13 which 1 did view.
Freeboard records show lagoon 1 at 19 inches and lagoon 2 at 38 inches on 2/7/02. This does not appear consistent with my
L Regional Office was not notified of noncompliant lagoon level as required by General Permit.
i. Application of waste occurred on field 2 on December 19, 2001; record for this event shows receiving crop as "bean stubble".
o crop is planted in the field at the time of this inspection; this is a violation for not planting a crop within 30 days of application.
Also, grower has sprayed on this same field on 2/11/02 and 2114/02; a viable crop in accordance with the waste utilization plan
ust be planted in this field by March 13, 2002 or you will be in violation for the 2/11/02 event.
Also, Mr. Sullivan said that he has leased out field 3; corn stubble is in this field and according to waste plan should currently
ive wheat planted in this field. From my conversation with Mr. Sullivan, it seems that there may be a potential problem planting tl
quired crop since this land is leased. I advised the Sullivans that the waste plan and permit must be followed or they will be in
olation and subject to enforcement actions.
ote: There are 2 pipes, one is corrugated black pipe and one is PVC pipe that empty into the waterway near the hog houses and
goons. Mr.. Sullivan was unable to tell me the origination point of these pipes; this information needs to be determined.

Drvrsion`of Wa
c _
Division of Soil and Water ConservaLon.
o�
Agency:
Other
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: % -3 Time: ®: Printed on: 7/21/2000
Facility Number
Q Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted 0 Certift 13 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operates] or Above Threshold: �,
Farm Name: ............. .. .�+..�LL/ U/ ......................... ...1� County:...---lD,.��t-..-......................`'1....
I Owner Name:.... ..... �.L.V/ ....: 1............... � �.�%�tli 7 1.................................. Phone No:.. � �..... ...... �, ....-.....................
Facility Contact: 1 ulltf'II'I ,�dL.L!✓Title: 0�khdl!SlCie. Phone No:. kw r�.7..................
................................................ .......... ... ....�
Mailing Address: .......&.Z...... r'.r. ... i�G1Y....X,1�.............. pr? .-.-��,--uor..........lV&.......... .1133 5",
Onsite Representative :..... le'UzUiJ%..�r .U..Y `- ....................... Igrator:,........!�-
nteD4.?!Y.1.....................
Certified Operator: ..... iU J,(���..Y..---•----•--------- Operator Certification Number: .................
Location of Farm:
Ojr-- jg/
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �'� Longitude •�°°
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Pnnulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Q
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry_ Capacity Population Cattle Cavacitv Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW 1 283
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lag--n Area ❑ Spray Fietd Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System .
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a- ff discharge is observed; was the conveyance than -made:'
b- If discharge is observed. slid it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes )d No
❑ Yes ❑ No'
❑ Yes ❑ No
c. 11" discharge is observed- what is the estimated flow in gal/min''
d- Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3- Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 StrUCLUrc 3 Structure 4
..... >1
❑ Yes Wo
Structure 5 Structure 6
Freeboard (inches):
5100 Continued on back

Facility Number: 40771 Date of Inspection j ! Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, [j yes No
seepage, etc.) id
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes A No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes XNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes A No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance. with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/) nspec tor fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
:: �'�10 •yiolatroris :o'r• deficiencies *r re noted- dukrttW this'visit: • :Y:oit VH1-t&d*fi h further
correspondence. abouf this visit.
❑ Yes 1KNo
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No.
❑ Yes No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
IJeV,b 7V
alAvy--e
,V" Ve,s T gay 6 &AA1S
eev1P
❑ Yes 4No
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes Ki No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes, j No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes] No
Reviewer/Inspector Name �1rLL GG/i¢- S I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: j. / 5100

F'hcility Number: ' — 71
Date of l.uspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge Wor below
❑ Yes
JVNo'
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
�j No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
Jl
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes]
No .
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
JH No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a peimanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
ATNo
Additional'Cornments'andforDrawings: - -
AL
.90 60U) AID A(41T) VFW 1L
J
5/00

ae1 i0. n orma ian.
Facility Number 31 471
Counft
uplin
Owner
illiam ISullivan
Manager
7 Bethel Church Rd
Olive NC
Certified
Farm Name
William Sullivan Farm
Phone Number
919-658-3518
Lessee
_ Region
PARO O MRO O WARO O WSRO
OF'RO O RRO (@) WIRO 8
Location
North of Summerlins Crossroads. On West side of SR 1505 approx. 1 mile North of SR 1004. Turn at
:mailbox along drive to the brick house back from the road. T
Certified Operator in Charge
Backup Certified Operator
Inactive operat JU Lagoon Closed Date inactivated or closed
Type of Operation
Swine [:]Poultry © Cattle ❑ Sheep 13Horses © Goats © None
Design Capacity ����
:: Layer ==
Total
SSLW
2
Subsurface Drains Present Lagoon Area
No Liquid Waste Management System
200 Swine
283,400 Farrow to Finish
Lagoon Total Capacity ft 1 495,255
Spray Field Area

Latitude
35.1367
35 1108 12
Longitude
77.9533
77 57 12
Request to be removed Removal Confirmation Recieved
Comments
Regional DWQ Staff .�.....�..�..�...�.
Basin Name: lCape Fear

Division of Soil and Water Conservatiod-Opera$on Review
�. _
El Division of Soil and:Water Conservation .Compliance Inspection t
w
A Division of Water C�ualtty Gomplia�ce inspection
'.S..J UOther Agency.- Operation Review ' r
0 Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DW ins ection Q Follow -tie of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection f
Time of Inspection EPEE24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted IN Certified © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 13 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ...... r< 't x%n �WL U/f71 .. .._...... County: _...... />U............................................
" ...... ................._..............
Owner Name: ...... 1/tJ1uf 1%' L �.tl-./ 1.]'.................. ...... Phane Na:...4�! ......tl�. .. .....................
Facility Contact: ....... 1r%.jr..............................................Title:....f.................... Phone No: ................
Mailing Address: ....1 .� .......i8'6.—A ......fli �� .... ..... .......'................................../ ,,� .............
r ��/✓e
Onsite Representative:........./ / 1......, UGL1 J�/r. ................... Integrator:..........,(. N . .�.......................................................
Certified Operator:.....,, a, Ll rye._ . , (J(iaril ✓ ,. Operator Certification Number:.... /
....................................................... .....
Location A Farm:
,Number of Lagoons Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area Spray Feld Area
L
olding Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
u.
`..
Discharizes & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated au [ILagoon ElSpray Field [IOther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potentt I adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment 4 vgfts T® PvMP
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: / Z
Freeboard(inches): ........../Z ................. .........f ................. ..................... ............... ................................... ............................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes J%No
❑ Yes A No
KYes ❑ No
Structure 6
...................................
El Yes ONo
Continued on back

Facility dumber: — Data of Inspection
'Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes X No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? AYes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenarice/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste ADolication
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes XNo
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes ;&No
12.
Crop type l "fir
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes No
h) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ANo
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ;-XNo
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Yes ❑ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ANo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ANo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) XYes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes XNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes XNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewerffnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No
13: Rio •viplaii6i is'oi- &fieie api •mere iiQfed- diWiiid this: visit: - Yoi ,will •rebd*46 Rio further
. - corieso oiidence' about. this :visit. - ... -
Comments (refer to questiorn 1#} Explain any YES answers and/or ai'y=recommendations or any_otler eomiments
Use,drawings 6f facility.to:Iietter:explain situations. (use additional_pages as.necessary)
_-
7. � -PtP� �xr��S�d�� oiJ �Abaa�J � 1✓�,Pt��-- - -- - ...
t . /. PpGI� u���rs✓ I118Jgt9 ;o pasT d aevosr ea4,J pi gtb s . d6"
rQ 69AIVeAr j-o W1Wr-� iakoP
—*Pp, 9/-f4e L( L -i�-& flep 0, rn4f Vc- 0,07'
Reviewer/Inspector Name L
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
�.
_ , w
..
m j
Date: L
3/23/99 .

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection
{]stir Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes Ix No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes XNo
31_ Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes XNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes #No
V&A/ ))-aM)f� -0A-"Ft6A Pipf, Vt-"r-P ot'l
WE" 7-49 - P)UW' t --
Mg • � j e�
3/23/99

r
Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 0
Facility Number Time of Inspection 00 24 hr. (hh:mm)
gistered Certified M Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated ...........................
Farm Name:.....11 �...�. � ....... <R:�.. Z1... `��..tl.tl-,...................... County:......... ... 1� .......................
` r \
Owner Name: \ ._ .......................
................................c-t ��Y..`,............................................... Phone No:......1..I.........R......g...
Facility Contact:.......................................................... ............. Title: ... Phone No:
Mailing Address: , „-,1........................................ ..............['ll.C`,......... .... ......... 3 ........ .........................
Oncite Representative:..... ........... . `..�-�: Integrator:.._.._.. `--� ��...........................
Certified Operator:............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number;
L,pFatiqij of F ,rN
Gam. � 1�.... :...3F.Y�:..... ....A ..�... ...�`s........ ........ ........ ... Ica....................�.................. �
}
�-r G:`........Ic-.....A�47.... . `'+..:'e:............ .. SJ ..Z1�-.................. .
Latitude Longitude
34
Hes►grt� Current Design Current :: Design Current
Swine :' :'
Capacity lPopu, tioi Poultry, .,. Capacity ,Pooulatron Cattle ¢ µ Capaerty Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer' ❑Dairy
El Feeder to Finish
❑Nan -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other Ia„
Farrow to Finish
ii 6 0 Total Deslgn capacity ,
❑Gilts"
`
❑ Boars
} To tal SSLW
Number of Lagoons I Holding Ponds ®.
Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area
Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
W
.r� s . _
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
)4 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
P(No
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
lZ A-
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
N(No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any partof the operation?
❑ Yes
0 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
[$ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
Wo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
9 No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
J8 No
7/25/97

Facility Number: 3
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laeoons.Holding Ponds. Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) -less than adequate?
El Yes KNo
❑ Yes (�No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 'Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier:
............... ................ e� ..................................................................................... ...................................................
Freeboard (ft): " `--.3...................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes P(No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes gNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? XYes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environrmiatal threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste A lication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff ente VingTaters of the State, notify DWQ)
1S. Crop typeC�''r` 4.h' j�`�..................................................................... ..................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0• No.violati6ns'or' deficiencies: were -noted -during this: visit.- YOU.W'ill receive, 'no'olfiiriher, .
correspondence dhout this.visit
`Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes P�,No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes KNO
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes O'No
t.aQk ❑ No
XYes ❑ No
❑ Yes V(No
❑ Yes XNo
�� a d�04k2�14 s4c2
7125/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �_�Q. _ Date: 1 � ! LU i C[y

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
P1 Division of Water Quality
ISMoutine O Complaint O Fallow -up of l)Wo inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 1111171
Facility Number
Time of Inspection I ' op 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered © Certified 13 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted JE3 not Operational I Date last Operated: ................
f 4 , • �
FarmName:...........W.'s �.4 ►Artt................................................. County: ...... N Y4..............................................................
Owner Name: ....... U%�J.Vi114m..................... .......iSul.li.fita......................................... Phone No:.(f?.1 A1..k..!�..A5_A.........................................
Facility Contact: ..i.�.L'Av r............�iy.l �.�Vi. ,.........n. Title: ...... Ql✓:':V9 .......................................... Phone .iP.......
Mailing Address:....... '�..... eY7n ...1 v<1.......i.. ................................... ..... �.... Q..� i ..! .....}......................... ........
Onsite Representative: ....... W.i.IkAr..........&Ahmo.............................................. Integrator :.......I.n).g oll..................... ...............``............
Certified Operator, .................. .............................................................yr-R/-.
Operator Certification Number........-1.3 4...........
Location of Farm:
T�.3ta.....lf+,tr�.. n,....asril�r.....iltsxs.................R...�.44..�rr.....x�ta�....rsA....SR,...l.7i........xa�r.....is..........
.g. S? ...:f 2 .....Q-...`�r:......gc_-O :..�:��..ar.�3 [�..}.. �......`�'1f!Q11.[�C ................. ..........PV
Latitude 00 6 44 Longitude • 01 46
Design - ,,Current Design Current � Design .Current �' `
Swine, h r Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Populatiana +wattle �, Capacity Population
y , .....
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ; ❑Dairy
c ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean -
fl
❑ Farrow to Feeder .., ❑ Other
a
y
Farrow to Finish 10 Total Design Capacity l '
Gilts.
❑ Boars Total'SSLW l
!OZ'
I�iumber of Lagoons i Holding Ponds L� Subsurface Drains r entJ10 Lagoon Area P SP ray Field Area
,; ? : ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
�..: , �:
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [$ No
Discharge ori-inated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? N 'L�
-d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes IA No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 1% No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes M No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than laQoonslholding ponds) require 14 Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 55 No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ® Yes �8 No
7/25/97
Continued on back

t
1
Facility Number: 31 — q 11
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes Q9 No
Structures {Lagoons.11oldingPonds, flush Pits, etcj
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 10 Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: L...�C.P.�(}�-......................................................
Freeboard(ft): ..........-.J�................ I .......... I ........................ ...............................................................................................................................................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
N No
It.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[ANo
12-
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
[A Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Yes
❑ No
V 'aste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
Q9 No
(If in excess of WMP. or runoff waters oftheState, notify DWQ)
15.
entering
Crop type ........ ................ ................ ....................... 66"ZO........................ .......... ................................
.. ...... I ........
I...............
lf.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
I(No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
fid No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
I9 No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
1< Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
&Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Pennitted Facilitie�
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 - No.violations or deficiencies were noted during this;visit.- .You:will receive 'no ftirther
corr6p6ridence ahout this visit:.: ' -.,-, ;
Comments,(refer:fo' question #): Explain any'YES answers and/or any recommendations orany; other coti n;ents`
Use drawings of facility Ea better expla4n sttuatons (use additional pages"as;necessaryj
nS. Le,,'
we�r 5tS64 6e retrMteS Q,,..d �:L. re�;,^t�, f
i. I..R5mr\ -0 1 V\, S 1 f1S lCi[N� it �iLs�Gf(!.
IL_ EroSjOr., c�;�+~� orr, qt._ o,.,+wd'k w-,,Al 5WAJ be f►IUJ Wi c�r� ta.tti0�t5ee�L�i• I met
a4 bus a& tko u I3 w_ ,re"veJ �ror, o`r t r d:;L walk, car, 64, (O�fQnS. t - OT J-% thi s
S�o��a be- 1 .ce�t)e�} Wes- a� °4PPr0�''`��e Co+irirr: ;n�e.'{ "'' Yt 0- tOTO.., -WZ slkdq]
�e. Co�e-v�-0• I t t}r�r
13. �30 a�oonS s� ovld k&vc I ► yIJ �t vc { MPVku-s
tg WLuat s�, pJ� � 6. OMW Gt S Boob A S P O TL IW . 7/25/97
y
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ Date:

1
Facility Number:.. ��... —..�i ��_., Date of inspection:
Additional Comments and/or Drawings
22_ S reLwblc s�.a��r� be ,� b� P�11 nv�r,l�er av►cj �� t 0 AV6,6 y- it atj 4
5ai ( S�mP% aMc-ly s es S�%Ovj� be- i y,
4/30/97

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE. 3� , 1994
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: LUL I'L R ✓w Sv l l )4/L)
q Mailing Address: 07 - 6 C i c c z
County: i
Integ*-ator--
On Site Representative: ^),
Physical Address/Locatiom
Type of Operation: Swine �_ Poultry ' Cattle
Phone:
Phone:
Design Capacity: f 0 c.7 _ Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEMT Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: L — —!�" Longitude: 7_' S 7 Elevation: Fee:
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have suffici nt freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or - .. - ...Actual Freeboard: —1—Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the Iagoon(s)? or No Was any erosion observed? 6� or No
Is adequate land available for spray? 'e or No Is the cover crop adequate? 0 or No
Crop(s) being utilized: Cof" VY- W" S
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from DwcllingsKy�Por No '
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or 'o
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Man Blue Line? gor No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man -trade ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes otg� If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the faciliry maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes. o
Additional Comments: i2e, ltk'ZCA'2211
Inspec—If
tor Nate
Stgnamre
cc: Vacilitv'Assessrnent Unit
U4s .- uacitmentsff Needed.

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. 331— A* V z
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGE.N ENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE. ,199.6
-Time: I : 4F�20 W
.�
Farm Name; Owner: < <L R t2nz S1., l v 1a iv
Mailing Address: , g z� i �tG (r _ C s _�kL+t �� • h�T ry _Z� 3tn
County: ✓ ► %�
Integ-ator:Phone:
On Site Representative: _ A)06)�E _ Phone:
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine _X Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Iv Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEI Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Lomitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have suffrci -tt freeboard of I Foot - 25 year 24 hour szorm event
'qt(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or ._ Actual Freeboard: —I—Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the laaoon(s)? or No Was anv erosion observed? j& or No
hY = Is adequate land available for spray? e or No Is the cover crop adequate? (9 or No
Crop(s) being utilized: jcrn w 3"—S
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200-Feet from Dwellinqs-
<f�Por No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or V�o
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? 0or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes 0r9 If Yes, Please Explain_
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes ory
Additional Comments: _Se_ t16S taev4, �-. �(Q ca
Ins4eN—fam Signature
cc: Facilitv Assessment Unit Use Aita,:fimems if Needed.

Site Requires Immediate Attention: —Les
I' Facility No. I I- V -7-1_
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIO SITE VISITATION RECORD
0 DATE: 7 , 1995
Time: 33,1-
Farm Name/Owner: 6,KZZe4
Mailing Address: l/ L
County: ! L/
Integrator:
On Site Representative: 1 GG/ 11'4
Physical Address/Location: _ fL /may,_ ,_ Ml L� ALbk-r of
DIGS t9d PJ9- fJ
Type of Operation: Swine _v/ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity:/ �D SoI.J B�CJ A/ Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Ajo �P� 4tl Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes r No Actual Freeboard: Ft. Inches
" Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes No Was any erosion observed? Yes or N
. Is adequate land available for pray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or -No
Crop(s) being utilized:
-Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwelling .Yes r No
100 Feet from Well . Yes r No
t_ Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS BIue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste Iand applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes KNoo If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate was a management records (volumes of manure, Iand applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes r N
Additional Comments: Ahyy �
Nlk • fd t L/ VA-d . 2 lkI-J_ -K &19, JgASS .7
Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
1>

OPERATIONS BRRNCH - WQ Fax:[phone] Aug 1 '95 11:35 P.10/20
•
Site Requires Immediate Attention _
Facility Number;
SrM VISITATION RECORD
DATE: (I - T 1995
Owncx: U)t ILL, Y�.A)Zy Fam Name:
Counter: '
Agent %9ftWp8*t*: — ph Qne. 91 d'21., f V?-/ -
Operator: Phone:
On Site Representative:
Physical Address: do ,
UK lse,rj W
Mailing Address:
Phone. -
Type of Operation: Swine l - Poultry Cattle H _^
Design rapacity: f 40) _.— Number of Animals on Size:
Latitude: — 0 " Longitude: o "
Type of Xnspectioa: Ground Aerial_ �,
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagovn have sufficient freeboard of l Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) lies or (9 Actual Freeboard: -!!�L Feet — Inches
For facts ies with more than one lagoon, please address the other lagoons' freeboard under the
comments section.
Was any seepage observed from the lapon(s)? Yes or No Was there erv5jan of the dam?: Yes or No
Is adequate land available for bind application? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
Fax to (919) ? 15-3559 Signature of Anent

corm F :
Record 55 of 89
Main e
H
t
_��eeeeeee���eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee����eeeeeee��ee�e�eeeeeeee�
Answer
#
55
FACILITY #c
31-471
xx
OWNER:
SULLIVAN,
WILLIAM
rx
z
FARM NAME:
tt
COUNTY:
DUPLIN
•
LOCATION:
SR1505 .8
MI N OF SR1500 ON W SIDE
•
NRCS PRIORITY:
YES
321
DEM PRIORITY:
YES
•
LETTER SENT:
8/14/95
e'
•
rl
INTERGRATOR:
PHONE NUMBER:
N/A
658-3518
0
a
INSPECTORS NAME:
WILLIAMS
�
a
INSPECTION DATE:
7/24/95�
:1
PROBLEM:
FREEBOARD
x
RESPONSE FROM LETTER:
x
LQS :
Xt
E
is
f
�
la
�eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee�eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee¥

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. -31-4 `I 3
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MA_NAGEME,iT
N- VtAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE. 1 , 1995
Time: 0lf^
Farzt Name/Owner: Al, \ iAv�"
Mailing Address: IMF
Counrv: \')"&6 N
Inte-arator:
Phone:
On Site Representative:°I.i1��A�.Sv�l`iu�'" Phone: S-I( 1 S /9
Physical Address/Locadon:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Desic--i Capacity:
Number of Animals on Site: C700
DEM Certification Number: ACE DE14 Certuication Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 01Longitude: " Elevation: Fee;
Circle Yes or No
Does the Anima WWaste Lagoon have sUffic tt freeboard of 1 Foot _ 25 year 2d hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot _ i inches) Yes or Actual Freeboard: Q Ft. O Inches
Was any seepage obse-.ved from the laaoon(s)? Yes or No Was a:_v erosion observed? rp or No
Is adequate land available for sprav? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or 0
Crops) be.ng uri iiZed: E_, V'eA '�>
Does the faciliry meet SCS minimum setbacti criteria? 200 Fee: corn Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from N� e'.ls? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stock -piled within 100 Fee: of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irigated within 25 Feet of a USGS ylan Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by than -made ditch, f ushing system, or other
similar man-made devices9or No If Yes, Please Expl-gin_
Does Lie facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spiv irigated on specific acreage with cove_ rop)? Yes or No
Additional Corimems: _Logic" 1.� c, a •,�
�Rr o� 15;r rr-
Insoc :or Nanii,
Signature
c : Ft�:ility Assc�ssrnent Unit L se a:= chments if NeLded.

. „ Environmental Chemists, Inc.
® hiA11-ING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: SHIPPING ADDRESS:
CONSULTING P.O. Box 1037 [phone] (Office) 6602 Windmill Way
C
ONSU TINSTS Wrightsville Beach, [phone] (tab) Wilmington,
CHEMNorth Carolina 28480 [phone] (Fax) North Carolina 28405
CHAIN -OF CUSTODY FOR SAMPLE COLLECTION
Client: k' Report # :
Collected By ( signature & print) :
V
Sample Type: Influent, flue , Well, Stream, Soil, Other
Collection: For composite Indicate Date & Time for Start & Finish
Location &
Identification.
Sample
Type
Collection.
Date Time
Bottle
ID
Lab
ID
Analysis
Requested
3I- U­1(
)Z
44-71
��-lr�JS7
3�'30 F
r>-,f AL
Transfe
Relinquished By
Date/Time
Received By
Date/Time
l
-
2
Proper Preservative Used: Acid Base
Received On Ice Chilled to 40C: Yes No
Acce^ted Rejected By Comment -
Comments
Delivered v r Received By
Other l�
Date Time -

.E
MAILING ADDRESS:
P_0. Box 1037
Wrightsville Bcaeh,
]worth Carolina 28480
.r
TO:
c0MpJ-.AY :
Fn.,K r -
F. R GM :
'Environmental Chemists, Inc.
,--5 r
Consulting Chemists
TELEPHONE!
[phone] (Officc)
[phone] (Lab)
[phone] (Fax)
SHIPPING ADDRESS:
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington.
North Carolina 2MS
OF FAGIES TO FCILLO' . 1 �2 3 4 5 G 7 8 9 10
DATE Gr,_",T: - • -�~ � T`�-�� - —
C .0 1
`"' S
. a...v
) TiE
cL D 05-6�--33
Is
l `
4