310467_HISTORICAL_20171231

NUH I H CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

Type of Visit: OD Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation C) Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (YRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emerizenev 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name-. -r-- tA 1), -C Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative -
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Form:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Region:
Certification Number: 9 9 oe /Z/-
Certification Number:
Longitude:
urrent
Do gn
S*
Gapnel
0
C rd,
t
Wean to Finish
Cow
Wean to Feeder
16ce
INon-Layer
I
Call'
Feeder to Finish
%Id2
440
airy Heifer
117arrow to Wean
urrent
Dry Cow
Warrow to Feeder
P.
Non -Dairy
Farrowto inish
Laers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non- -ayers
1 Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
lBeef Brood
oults
Discharges ag-d—Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Structure 0 Application Field El Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (Ifyes, notify DWR)
2. 1 s there ev i dence o f a past d i s c harge from any part o f the op erat i on ?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a d i scharge?
El YeseNo 0 NA [:) NE
F] Yes E] No F] NA E] NE
F] Yes 0 No EDNA [j NE
F] Yes E] No [:] NA [D NE
Yes � �NoE3NA NE
Yes ��"' u ,,
No[:3 NA NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

lFacility Number: '1/-_ rDate of Inspection: / i
Waste (�ollection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [D Yes 0"No DNA DNE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural 1reeboard? [—] Yes F-1 No [] NA [:] NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
F-1 N
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Yes 2T7No E] NA4 N E
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a Yes CfNo 0 NA NE.
waste management or closure plan?
ir any or questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental breal,notiryDWR
lent
V
7. Do any of th e st ruc t u res need mai nte n anc e or i m pro v em ent? D Yes No 0 NA NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by (he permit? Yes � �No NA NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require E3Yes 21�o N A D N E
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Anylication
10. A re th ere any req U i Ted b u tfe rs, setbacks, o r co in p I i an ce a] ternat i ve s th at n eed D Yes [201qo D NA 0 NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. D Yes 21"No [:] NA [:] NE
Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
PAN M PAN> 10%or l0lbs. El Total Phosphorus [] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
F-1 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14.
Do the receiving crops ditTer from those designated in the CAWMP?
D Yes
allo
D NA
D NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
D Yes
2<o
EDNA
D NE
16.
Did the faci I ity fai I to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
Yes
j No
NA
D NE
acres determination?
17,
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
D Yes
ONo
0 NA
[:] NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
E—] Yes
12-1 �o DNA
D NE
Reauired
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
0 Yes
ZeNo
D NA
0 NE
20.
Does the faci I ity Chi I to have a] I components of the CA W M P readily avai table? I f yes, check
[:].Yes
Er'No
[:] NA
C—] N E
the appropriate box.
DWUP ElChecklists D Design 0 Maps [:] Lease Agreements DOther:
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. D Yes [2<o DNA D NE
F-1 Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis D Soil Analysis D Waste Transfers D Weather Code
DRainfall. El Stocking 0 Crop Yield D 120 Minute Inspections D Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections D Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? Yes 0'_No� D NA [:] NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? DYes ;'No [:] NA 0 NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

lFacility Number: W2 Wate of Inspection.
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? F-1 Yes ErNo NA D NE
25. 1 s the faci I ity out ot'comp] iance with permit conditions re lated to sl udge? I f yes, check Yes a<o C] NA NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey D Fail urc to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [:]Yes ONo DNA 0 NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? [—] Yes D No 0_�N�Ao NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concem?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
3 0. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
E] Application Field Ej Lagoon/Storage Pond D Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34: Does the facility require a Collow-up visit by the same agency?
'Z� ix le'4 /&
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewerfl nspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
/�7
Ik
'1�5 -
D Yes 2<o E] NA D NE
El Yes �0 D NA E] NE
D Yes 0_1�0 0 NA [_—] NE
0 Yes ONo
��A D N E
/Z%
[—]Yes Rr`N9 [] NA
D Yes WN9 E] NA
'N
[:]Yes � �No D NA
iins'ur n 01th r Mmmenfi
Phone:
Date:
21412015
NE
NE
NE

rype of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit. 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrivn]Tlme:l 2200____1 Departure Time: County:
Form Name: v Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Phone:
Title: Phone: ; ,
Onsite Re resentative: 1, '/1/ 1A Integrator:
p
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude-
Region:
DesIM-d-r-
en
_ML CHL
a P
�t(
,Aoultir.y,
[S it
P..
SPOP.
We a n to Finish
I
Dairy Cow
W n to
Wean to Feeder
e a
a er
E�]
Dairy Calf
c cto
r 1,
Fccdcr to Finish
Dairy Heifer
rrow t
Farrow to Wean
n
Current
Dry Cow
pWean
rrow t
Al'arrow to Feeder
I
Rop.
Non -Dairy
rrow t
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
C'ilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
1 0.3 rs
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
t e
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharizes and Stream lmvacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Structure D Application Field 71 Other:
a, Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system7 (if yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential a dverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
[:]Yes P"'No E] NA E] NE
E] Yes R No
El YesWNo
Yes 9 No
Yes �ffNo
Yes ��o
NA NE
NA NE
NA NE
NA NE
NA NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

[Facilit - (d�; :�g �:]
y Number: 31 [Date of Inspection: W15
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes No NA NE
25, Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes No NA NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fai I provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal7
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fai I to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 1. Do sub surface ti I e d rai n s ex ist at the fac i I i ty? I f ye s, check t h e app rop ri ate bo x b el ow.
[D Application Field [] Lagoon/Storage Pond 0 Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
E] Yes No NA NE
[:] Yes No NA NE
C] Yes F No
[] Yes IiNo
[:]Yes No
[:]Yes No
F] NA [—] N E
[:] NA [3 NE
[:] NA [:] NE
[:] NA [:] NE
Yes
CA No
NA
NE
Yes
Ej o
NA
NE
ED Yes
gNo
NA
NE
Comments (refer� to..questlon #)- 1xplafirt Any YES answai and/or -any'' contments.
Rdditlonal recommentlatiom.or any.o,ther.
U d w ng n s tuat ons (u es a . s nece . ssay.
ie ra I i of facility, to. Mtei exip:i Ai i' - I additional pag
71-L41L 1. 9 1
0- -7 L(
Y16 //(, 4,1-) k C/
O�76 P J�_
3 k
f 41�y -
Reviewer/Inspector Name: V'e41A Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015

lFacility Number: 3/ - V4 �L:] Epa�teof inspection: tt4�,,
4/6 1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
D Yes
P No
D NA
D NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
D Yes
JZ No
D NA
D NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
D Yes
No
[DNA
NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
'9
6. Are there structures on -site which are riot properly addressed and/or managed through a
D Yes
[7--?No
E] NA
D NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes No DNA NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes No [:] NA NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes V No [1] NA D NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste ADDlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
Yes
No
NA
NE
maintenance or improvernent7
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application7 If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes
NA
NE
�kNo
Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground [:] Heavy Metals (CU, Zn, etc .
PAN M PAN > 10% or 10 ibs. Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
Outside of Acceptable Crop Window Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13, Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
D Yes
A No
D NA
NE
IS . Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
D Yes
ZNo
D NA
D NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
Yes
No
NA
NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
D Yes
No
NA
NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Yes
[/No
NA
NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Pennit readily available?
Yes
No
NA
NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
D Yes
No
D NA
D N E
the appropriate box.
D WUP El Checklists [::]Design El Maps El Lease Agreements DOther:
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. D Yes a No
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis D Soil Analysis D Waste Transfers
Rainfall D Stocking Crop Yield F1 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:] Yes [4 No
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? Yes 4NO
NA [:J NE
Weather Code
C] Sludge Survey
[:] NA NE
DNA NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

fype of Visit: in . pliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: utine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
�l t - 2 i—fo
Date of Visit: EO, '14 Arrival Tirnefl PA"eparture Time: County: Region: 6�j. zzltl
0 -----7--
Farm Name: e--r- Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facidity Contact:
Tiflet
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude.
Phone:
Phone-.
Integrator: z 2:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
I G
r
Sw ne Gapa lit C
et oultr
_-rSign
C-
�1 I rD%-e Fil anni VG I r r e n t
op.
Wean to Finish
..-_INon-Layer
Layer
I
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
paiIH-ca If
Dairy Heifer
Feeder to Finish
M
Farrow to Wean
ign
Dr
_yXow
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
ry PEER
Layers
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Boars
e
F70(—her
Non -Layer
Pullets
ke s-
key Poults
Other
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
DischarUs and Stream Impact
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Structure Application Field F1 Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
E] Yes JZ'Ro [] NA [] NE
E] Yes EfNo
[:]Yes �!rNo
C] Yes 2fN0
C] Yes O�N,
C] Yes �FNo
NA NE
NA NE
NA NE
NA NE
NA NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

IFacility Number: rp—ateof inspectioni, 177 j'_. 7
k
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? D Yes &No [:] NA D NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? D Yes Cj"No DNA D NE
Structure l , Structu . 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway? -
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed7 D Yes E210 [3 NA D NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a Yes do [:] NA [:] NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes 'PNo [:] NA NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? D Yes �ZNo D NA NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Ej Yes eN o [] NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste-Ap lication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need D Yes [3*No D NA D NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below, [:]Yes VfNo [:] NA [] NE
F1 Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground [—] Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
M PAN M PAN> 10%or l0lbs. D Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
F-1 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Typc(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
I
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
D Yes C2r�lo
E3NA
D NE
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvcmen(?
D Yes M'Ne
7-
D NA
NE
16. D id the fac i I ity fa i I to sec ure and/o r ope rate pe r th e i rri gation desi gn or wettab I e
Yes Jallo
NA
NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Yes ONo
NA
NE
18. Is there a lack'of properly operating waste application equipment?
Yes O'No
NA
NE
Reguired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
Yes L3"N'o
D NA
D NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
D Yes ET'No
D NA
DNE
the appropriate box,
DWUP E]Checklists [:] Design [:] Maps [:] Lease Agreements Other:
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. D Yes '��o
0 Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers
F1 Rainfall D Stacking [:] Crop Yield D 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? D Yes 16 No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? C] Yes �yNo
[j NA D NE
D Weather Code
Sludge Survey
NA NE
NA NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

lFacility Number: Zj FDate of Inspection:
24. 134 the facility fai I to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permi(? El Yes [,-,-J'Ro
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check 0 yes c
the appropriate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? Yes ONO
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Yes 07NO
0 NA C] NE
0 NA ONE
NA 0 N E
NA [:] NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document 0 Yes jno 0 NA NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? 0 Yes 'I�N o NA NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the Yes ZINO NA NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 1. Do subsurfac e ti le drain s ex ist a t th e fac i I i ty? I f yes, c h cc k th e appro pri ate b ox be I ow, Yes 20 No NA NE
0 Application Field 0 Lagoori/Storage Pond M Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the pen -nit or CAWMP? Yes 7� No NA NE
No E] NA NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? Yes V,
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Yes 1�40 [:] NA NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
U.)e fwu
6 ­325' r 0 C-4 P C4 rrf,
�Odk
26/ � L
Reviewer/Inspccior Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: -///,,
X14170fi

aAmvislo" or water Quality � " 11
Pacility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
111 0 Other Agency
Type of Visit 10-compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Aslistance
Reason for Visit _04outine. 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other D Denied Access
Date of Visit: I
Farm Name.
Owner Name:
Mailing Address -
Physical Address:
Arrival Time: Departure Time:
Z,-. - - 4V- 2/ - k��
Facility Contact: Title-
Onsite Representative:dzd� 463
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
ID Other
County:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone No.
Integrator.
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: =0 =1 =11 Longitude: =0=1 =&I
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population WetPoultry Capacity Population
11 El Layer I
10 Non-Laxer
Dry Poultry
El Layers
El Non -Layers
El Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
El Other
DischaEg&s & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field [I Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
EJ
Dairy Cow
I
El
Dairy Calf
I
El
Dairy Heifer
El
Dry Cow
Ej
Non-DaiEy
El
Beef Stocker
El
Beef Feeder
El
Beef Brood Cowl
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters o C the State
other than from a discharge?
Cl Yes ��o D NA Cl NE
0 Yes
El No
0 NA
0 NE
E] Yes
El No
[I NA
El NE
I
I
0 NA
El NE
0 Yes
El No
El Ycs 0�10 E-1 NA El NE
D Yes dNo D NA D NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: ?/- V,1,�V Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? El Yes /11 No El NA El NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? El Yes El No El NA El NE
Strue I S :92 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity ofany of the structures observed? 0 Yes ONo
[INA El NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed 0 Ye %, ,Z No
El NA 0 N E
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [:1 Yes O'No
El NA El NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? 0 Yes No
P
EINA El N E
(N ot ap p I i c able to roo fe d p i ts, dry s ta c ks and/or wet stac ks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require D Yes �INo
[I NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Aimlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need E]Ycs [�No
[INA EINE
maintcriance/improvernent?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes )Z No
El NA [I NE
El Excessive Ponding [I Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground [I Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
El PAN [IPAN>10%orl0lbs [:1 Total Phosphorus [I Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
El Outside of Acceptable Crop Window [:1 Evidence of Wind Drift [:1 Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
(I Yes
Q`N o
[:1 NA
[] NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
[:1 Yes
1;2-So
El NA
El NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acrc determination ?
El Yes
No
El NA
[I NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
?'N o
D NA
[I NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yes
�rN.
0 NA
El NE
d I' ents J,,
U o'qt )lain any YES answer&i . in men a ons or '6y other, com �ia
Use,'d r a'w� JA'g"'S. ofl'acflit'y�i-to bett�i�iexplalnl
P 7vi"MN4 L �4 A
AL
0A Sol/ Sq1'1VnPZ9 S_
qV
Reviewer/Inspector Name Fg7N
Phone*
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 2 of 3 1 Z1281U4 Continued

FFatility Number: Date of Inspection
Reguired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? El Yes PrNo NA 0 NE
20. Does the Facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check Yes ;;�No NA El NE
the appropriate box. Cl WUP El Checklists [I Design D Maps 0 Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,,chc the appropriate box-helow. Yes No NA El NE
D Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Anal "' El S 'I Analysis El Waste Transfers El Annual Certification
s 01
El Rainfall El Stocking El Crop Yield �C] -120 Minute In leti69-110 Monthly and I" Rain Inspections El Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge'?
E]Yes
,0 No
El NA
0 NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and mainlain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
El Yes
ffNo
El NA
El NE
eDid
the facilitty fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
El Yes
P(No
L1 NA
El NE
25.
Did the facility fail to c6nduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
D Yes
JZ No
El NA
L1 NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
D Yes
ZNo
El NA
El N E
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
D Yes
2"No
0 NA
El N E
Other Issues
28, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance ofthe permit or CAWMP? El Yes ONo El NA El NE
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
El Yes
ZNo
[I NA
El NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
El Yes
[2rNo
[I NA
El NE
If ycs, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
E]Yes
�rNo
[:1 NA
0 NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
El Yes
o
El NA
El NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
PNo
El NA
El NE
r Wings:
Additioflal.Comments'and/or 0 a
AL
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Lscilif� Number:L-3/ — ViTeze �10 Date of Inspection
I 741�
Waste Collection rreatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Yes /E No D NA 0 NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? [:]Yes PNo EINA [:INE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
"I
Identifier: _2_
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures obsMed? L1 Yes ,3 No [I NA D NE
Oe/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed El Yes ONo 0 NA [j NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? D Yes 7No El NA NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes VNo [I NA NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes P'No [I NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Arc there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need El Yes �TNo D NA D NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below, El Yes P�No El NA [I NE
El Excessive Ponding [:] Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground D Fleavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
EIPAN EIPAN>10%or]Olbs [Trotal Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
L1 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window [I Evidence of Wind Drift C1 Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
C3 Yes
Ef No
El NA
0 NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
El Yes
PNo
Ll NA
[I NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the iff igation design or wettable acre determination?[:] Yes
PNo
[I NA
[__1 NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
[:1 Yes
/11 No
C-1 NA
[j NE
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
C] Yes
P No
[:] NA
[:] NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
AL
Reviewer/Inspector Name 61)IV\, (gAIIA(I Phone:
ReAewer/Inspector Signature: IL Ju_ul Date:
12128104 Continued

Date of Inspection
J Facility Number:
ReQuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? El Yes ',0 No El NA El NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
El Yes
C
[:1 NA
0 NE
the appropirate box. El WUP El Checklists El Design 0 Maps 0 Other
',14o
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
��Yes
El No
0 NA
0 NE
El Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard [I Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers [:1 Annual Certification
OtRainfall El Stocking El Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and I"
4 71 '110
Rain Inspections El
Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
E]Yes
QNo
0 NA
El NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers. on irrigation equipment7
[--]Yes
allo
EINA
ONE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
El Yes
Z No
0 NA
El NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
0 Yes
4 No
0 NA
El NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than nonnal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 1. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (icl discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0 Yes �TNo
0 Yes ;TNo
[:1 NA El NE
0 NA ONE
• Yes j2No
El NA
El NE
• Yes
P�No
El NA
El NE
El Yes
pXo
0 NA
El NE
0 Yes
ZNo
0 NA
0 NE
0 Yes
ONo
El NA
0 NE
E-1 Yes Q No El NA El NE
I:;* —
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
6e
AL
JV28104
-C

Type of Visit (!�dompllance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other El Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival,rime: DepartureTime: County:,U40�2_ Region 4L-114a
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact- Title: Phone No:
Integrator: �,All_
Onsite Representative: I - —_ - Off
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number -
Back -up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = I = 11 Longitude: =O=i [�Ll
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
�arrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
100ther
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Layer
INon -Layer L
Dry Poultry
Layers
Non -Layers
El Pullets
1:1 Turkeys
ID Turkey Poults
10 Other — - -------
Discharges & Stream Impact
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'!
Discharge originated at: 0 Structure Ej Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance mari-made?
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Population
El
Dairy Cow. . .
El
Dairy Calf
I
El
Dairy Heifei
0
Dry Cow
El
Non -Dairy
El
Beef Stockei
El
Beef Feeder
El
Beef Brood Co�
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volurne that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (Iryes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
El Yes,,allo El NA El NE
El Yes
El No
El NA
El NE
El Yes
El No
EINA
El NE
El NA
El NE
Yes
12 No
El Yes
;]"No
C:1 NA
0 NE
E]Yes
t�2­No
[]NA
[] NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Wasts-
,, Collection & Treatment
14. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. I l'yes, is waste level into the structural f'reeboard?
Structure I Structyre 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spiliway7:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): :2
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
D Yes ErNo 0 NA El NE
0 Yes D No 0 NA [I NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
L1 Yes _O No [1 NA El NE
El Yes '; No El NA EINE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0 YesQNo El NA [I NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? D Yes 3-No 0 NA El NE
(N ot app I i cabl e to roo fe d pi ts, dry s tacks an d/or we t s Lac ks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require D Yes 0 No D NA D NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste AoPlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need El Yes UNo [I NA El NE
maintenance/improvernent?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? Il'yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes E�No [:1 NA El NE
• Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload [:1 Frozen Ground [:1 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
• PAN El PAN > 10% or 10 lbs [I Total Phosphorus [:1 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
El Outside of Acceptabic Cron Window El Evidence of Wind Drifl El Avolication Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13, Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? [:1 Yes J2 No El NA El NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? El Yes B-No El NA El NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre deten-ninationiF—1 Yes In -No El NA 0 NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? [I Yes J�J`No El NA El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes [So El NA 0 NE
A* RM (�Px'j_ '?w
Y.N Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Name F1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: I ZC Date:
12128104 Contimued

Facility Number: 31 Date of Inspection
k
Reg Wired Records & Documents
w 19: Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? El Yes _ErNo El NA D NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check El Yes 2No El NA 0 NE
the appropiraw box, El WUP El Checklists El Design 0 Maps [:1 Other
"E5,
Y�s
2 1. Do e s rec ord kee p i n g nce d i mp rove rn ent? I f ye s, ch eck the app ropri ate box be I ow. ffNo EINA El NE
El Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard P<aste Analysis' 0 Soil Analysis Waste Transfers EI'Xnnu,a.1 Certification
El Rainfall El Stocking [I Crop Yield [:1120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and I " Rain Inspections El Weather Code
22.. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the racility fail to secure 6'phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted whicii cause non-complianec of the permit or CAWMP?
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air qua] iiy concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 1. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection -with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by sarne agency?
0 Yes allo
EINA
El NE
E]Yes ET'No
EINA
ED NE
El Yes qNo
El NA
El NE
0 Yes Q-No
El NA
El NE
[--]Yes 2No [:INA 0 NE
El Yes ;Jf-;o El NA El NE
D Yes ;2No El NA El NE
E3 Yes DNo El NA D NE
El Yes PkNo D NA EINE
D Yes 21"No 0 NA El NE
D Yes D No El NA El NE
0 Yes C3 No 0 NA El NE
ell / 12e,
L
12128104

ITypeofVisit 917 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other M Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Facifity Number
)dPermitted Fl"C'ertified 13 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered
Farm Name -
Time:
Not Oner8tiGnshl 0 Below
Date- Last Operated or Above 7breshold:
County:
Owner Name: -.—. . .................... 'Phone No:
MaiIing Address: .......
Facility Contact. Tide: Phone Ni
Integrator.
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:_., Operator Certificodrin N1
Location of Farm:
iswinle Ypouftry [3 Cattle [3 Horse Latitude a 41 66 Longitude a 6 46
Swine -
Wean to Feeder
F 'o
e Eed e:r :to!Fi n!i s h
w to,7
e
JFLarrow to Wean
ZFarrow to Feeder
El Farrow to Finish
N 61-Lagooz
r- _01� � _,_ 1. 1 - - �Ilc .. . ' _xC
um
Ded
gn
try e
!YLIPOO tion�::,4pot non 71dittli
ti pv�t"
FiArIT-aver I I ��flM Dairy t I
Other
Pe-Ca�* t
p. _y,,q
M
Totid SSL
DischaMes A S Impac
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: [I Lagoon [I Spray Field [3 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the Suite other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is itorage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? [3 Spfllway
Structure I �"crure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
12112103
0 Yes )2(No
U Yes EJ No
C Yes [I No
0 Yes [3 NO
E]Yes ;alf4o
[I Yes F`No
0 Yes P110
Structure 6
Continued

lFacility Number: 3 ) Date of Inspection
5. Are t4ere any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
S. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctums lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation marldngs?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
I I - Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
0 Exccssi-%
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
(CAWNP)?
Odor bisues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
19. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, andlor public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
ity r oneld
Vsi dJ614W expl wtuatiom an "ditio"ba P"&"' i
M as necesm
so
ol(
/-�-7 - -, I , rA
1'e
r e P, o o, —e—
ReviewerAnspector Name R
Ll
Reviewer/Inspector Signature -
Date:
El Yes PINO
13 Yes A No
0 Yes P�No
0 Yes XNO
0 Yes )dNo
El Yes tVNO
0 Yes Pf No
El Yes A No
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
0 Yes 'ONO
13 yes JPNO
0 Yes MNo
0 Yes J2140
[I Yes )ZrNo
0 Yes ;2'go
C] Final Notes

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
ReguirQ RecoE& & ftuments
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? Yes ?1NO
22. Does the facility fa to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) Yes No
9D
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes VNO
Waste Application [3 Fmeboard 0 Waste Analysis 0 Soil Sampling
No
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? yes 9(?�
25. Did the facility fail to have, a actively certified operator in charge? 0 Yes ;eNo
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over appliclaion) El Yes A'No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? Yes No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes ;d]No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 13 yes XNO
xm]tWd Fladliti
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) 0 Yes ;dNo
3 1. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El Yes 0 No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? Yes El No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? Yes 0 No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? 0 Yes ONO
35. Does record keeping for NPDIES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes 0 No
[3 Stocking Form 0 Crop Yield Form [I RainfaU [3 Inspection After I " Rain
120 Minute Inspections 0 Annual Certification Form
12112103

0
Type of Visit oCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review (:) Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine C) Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification '01*6ther 0 Denied Access
Facility Number D--E�= I Date of Visit:
[3 Permitted 13 Certified [3 Conditionally Certifled [3 Registered
Form Name:
Owner Name.
M ailing Address -
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
rnme.. I q -1 2 S71
rO �NMQQeratlonal 0 Below- 1hrushold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County- -D tie
9
Phone No.
Phone No:
Integrator: n1vtkok-a iiz
I
Operator Certification �Umber:
0 Swine Cl Poultry El Cattle El Horse Latitude 0 6 46 Longitude 0 6
Design. Current
Design Current Design Current
Swine Cavaeltv P . ovulation
Poultry
capackv Population ': cattle Capacltv Population
El Wean to Feeder
Layer
Dairy
Feeder to Finish
I
Non -Layer
Non-DaiJy
El Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
Other
El Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
El Cilts
-Boars
Total SSLW
N6 -:6
4re Subsurface Drains Present JEEJ_La.on�Area 10 Spray Field Area
�A
10 No Liquid Waste Management Systcr
t -ji oldi n'g Pon ds Sol I d. T ra ps .n
................
Discharges & Strearn Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: [--] LaRoon Xsvray Field 0 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. I r discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Stater? (If yes, noti fy DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed.. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Il'yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm s(orage) less than adequate? El Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
IdentiFier:
Freeboard (inches)-.
05103101
Xycs 0 No
L1 Yes 0 No
_,�2 Yes [I No
L-4 5
0 Yes El No
0 Yes El No
D Yes C3 No
0 Yes El No
Stnicture 6
Continued

Facility Numb'er.- _31 (2 Ll Date of Inspection
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
Yes
No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
Closure Plan?
El Yes
No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered ves, and the situation poses an
immeiliate public health or environme'rital threat, notif�v DWQ)
7. Do any of the strucrures need maintcnanceimprovement?
El Yes
No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/imprcvement?
El Yes
El No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
0 Yes
E) No
Nk'aste Application
10. Are there anv buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
El Yes
E-1 No
11. Is there evidence of over application? xcessive Ponding 0 PAN _21lydraulic Overload
Yes
ONo.
12. Crop type
13. D o the rec e i v i n g crops d f ffer wi th thos e des i gnated in th c Certifi e d Ani mal Waste Manag ern en t P [an (CA Arm P)?
Yes
0 No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
13 Yes
El No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
El Yes
El No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
E] Yes
ID No
15� Does the receiving crop need improvement?
El Yes
E:1 No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Yes
[I No
Reguired Buords. & Dgeuments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
Yes
El No
18. Doe5 the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Oe/ NNW, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
El Yes
El No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
El Yes
El No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
Yes
CNo
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
Yes
[__1 No
22, Fail tonotify regional DNVQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(W discharge, freeboard problems. over application)
El Yes
El No
23. Did Reviewer.11rispector fail to discuss Teviewiinspection with on -site representative?
El Yes
;eNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0 Yes
E3 No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Cerfified AWMP?
El Yes
[I No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visiL
".Vwlw�v i�vox.�r. wv�. 1�1 row,;,. "JU.—
.0):, Ei�l sny�' answers anwonany,mornmendations or,any V., 'W.
M�
4�'
Ust drowin& of facUlty.to better exphdn sltiiiiti6k (use additi6nial pages as __y Field Copy El Final Notes
e 1i cet4 ;on o e r, ve eay( eA7 -�Ae S/,:7r q 1r, "'/W -I ri 4 W'l s �e
rv*76-1�r L-y;SChff.- rd ;7 4 el z_,�ov4a"-r '0/' �4e elis6to"ge
�1-5
4, 5o,-ALce' tvO4 iS 65q,,nc��e,4 1,,4 #5,0
I'P e ai,, of �ro
jo thfek Ike eld e;r;) po;,74 Vel-4 I'VIAe.- d'�<.c4q e2
CM,
Revieweranspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: &AV_R�L_ Dole:
051103101 Confinued

Type of Visit �M Compliance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine () ComplaInt 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other 0 Denied Access
IFacility Number Date (of Visit:
F�Pcrmitted 13 Certified C1Co]d;i'�tJnaflvCertlJ]jed [3 Registered
Form Name: k
it
Owner Name:
M ailing Address:
Facility Contact: A I ritic:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Ti in e:
Date Last Operated bove Thrush d:
County: PIVMX�7
Phone No:
. PIWne No:
Integrator:, /&"—Z�Z
Operator Certification Number:
P(Swine [] Poultry [I Cattle C] Horse Latitude 41 & 66 Longitude 0 .6
Design, Current Design Current.. Design, Current
Swine cnpacitv population Poultry calmeity Population Cattle Cariacity Population
Wean to Feeder- Layer Dairy
Feeder to Finish Ej Non -Layer I Non-Daia I
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder Other . .. ... . .. ....
Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity T
El ciiits
[3 Boars Total SS1, W..
Subsurface Drains I0 Lawon Area SrorayjFiel�d �Arca
�utn er o -Lagoons Present
. .... No Liquid �Vaste Management System
qu-41"O"[ Solid Trapis
Discharges _& Stream ImUacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes [I No
Discharge originated at; El Lagoon 0 Spray Field El Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? El Yes D No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection I&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (Freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillwav
StructuTc I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identilier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
El Yes 0 No
0 Yes El No
El Yes El No
D Yes El No
0 Yes El No
Structure 6
Continued

lFacilltyNumber- & —q&z Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (icl trees, severe erosion,
Yes
[I No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
El Yes
El No
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes
C1 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
Yes
No
9. Do any stucturcs lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Yes
No
Waste Agglication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
[I Yes
El No
11. Is there evidence of over applicat')n? Excessive Ponding PAN [I Hydra c Overload
D Y
[:1 No
12. Crop type /�' Yjr-- z2'<A'Qr"%1
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designatca in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
1b Yes
[] No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Yes
No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
Yes
No
c) This facility is Vended for a wettable acre determinafion?
El Yes
El No
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement?
[:1 Yes
[I No
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
0 Yes
ONo
Required Records & Documents
17. F ai I to have Certi fi c ate o f Cov erage & G encral Perm it or other Perm it readi ly avai I ab I C?
0 Yes
El No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
[I Yes
[] No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
D Yes
El No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
El Yes
No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
Yes
No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Yes
No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
El Yes
;2f�o
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
[I No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
C1 Yes
[I No
No vi ol atio ns o r defi ci e n c les we re n oted d u rin g thl s v [sit. You will rec eive no fu rther c o rrespondence about this visi 1.
&in6�(i&;j6,qu6WN)R gra ot e Comm
-ogi- Explain aii& ES. -answers and/onaby. re6raffiendiiiendran
Res
yi W,� bk6R'e% p lal n si tu ifflo n s., (uie addi d6di I, oii'kisii i�r ii sa
Ai
ield Conv Final Notes
11J�r'��W ilr� �t 4�4 _41, --v
.... ..... ........ .
V 0
-Anl
r-oCt-ow- LIP -400WE
Hw
Reviewer/Inspector Naine
ZU
Reviewer/Inspector ManntUre:
Date:
05103101 Continued

Typo of Visit P Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
ReasonforVisit J6Routine OComplaint OFollowup 0 Emergency Notification ' 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Facilltv Number Date of Visit-
�Permitted OCertified [3 Conditionally Certified [3111egistered
Farm Name: i�m-m5 K- & -::::E
Owner Name: iN-r C-- �e�ro r"
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Tifle:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator;
Location of Farm:
Time:
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County: _Uq pertj -
Phone No:
Phone.No.
Integrator: 12&BR�j
j El F
Operator Certification Number;
0 Swine D Poultry 0 Cattle 0 Horse Latitude a 1 69 Longitude 0 6 4.
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine capacity Population oultry Cattle
Capacity Population capacity Population
E1Wcan to Feeder I E-1 Layer I I 1 1[:] Dairy
Feeder to Finish JEJ Non -Layer I I JE1 Non-Dai!j
Farrow to Wean -5 bc) ther
Farrow to Feeder — Lao I I
3 Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity L
El Gilts
Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons Subsurface Drains P�rcsent �La -o�onAren ][I Spray Field Area
11111olding Ponds / So lid "111'raps. 10 No Liquid Waste Management Sjstem 7
DAscharges -& Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation.'
Discharge originated at: E:1 LaLroon [I Spray Field El Other
a. I f d i sc ha rge is o bsery ed, wa s the c o nv cyanc c ma ti - rn ad e?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (I f yes. nofify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notily DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Wast Collection & TEcatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storin storage) less than adequate? C3 Spillway
slructVrL; I St ture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier; K4
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
El Yes �'No
[I Yes [--] No
El Yes El No
E]Yes
El No
Yes
A No
Yes
P�No
Yes
Structure 6
JVNO
Continued

I 'i
[Facility Number: Al -12� Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (id trees, severe erosion,
El Yes
No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
El Yes
VNO
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
El Yes
No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvemcut?
El Yes
No
9. Do any stuctures I ac k adeq uate, ga uged markers wi th req u ired m ax i in u in a nd in i n i m um I iq u i d I eve I
elevation markings?
El Yes
9(No
Waste ARRUcatio
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
El Yes
No
11. Is there evidence of over applicativn? 0 Excessive Pondi PAN Hydraulic Overload
N\�
El Yes
No
12. Crop type One.)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designadd in the Cc imal WAAM'n (CAWMP)?
[:],Yes
0
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
C1 Yes
No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
[__1 Yes
No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre dctermi nation?
D Yes
No
15, Does the rcceiving crop need improvement?
El Yes
No
16. 1 s there a I ac k o f adeq uate waste app I ic at ion equ ipm ent?
El Yes
O'No
Regulrtd Records & Documents
17. Fai I to have Cc rti fi cate of Co ve rage & General Perm i t o r o th er Perm i t read i I y ava i I ab I e?
Yes
P�No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components ofthe Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
C-1 Yes
[�No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
(es
Kyes
El No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback crited a in effect at the time of design?
Fr, No
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
El Yes
V'No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Yes
ONo
(je/ discharge, freeboard. problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representafive?
YeR
No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes
No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance ofthe Certified AWMP?
Yes
P�No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
M
'0 _en1s,-(F_-efgr—.t-o desilon #): gfplain;any,iVES'ibswer.i-ajnd/or any recommendations or any other comments
se gs f ficilit to bette ex ry):
pages. as necessa Field Copy Final Notes
M_
7 k:55 401//V40 Z4 00VA15 lVel-e 05 140
66 xr/04&1�57011 \,�PMM&4-r
PPJ I-A-r,18
20iq/
ta'-5
V?7-
AA
4AM AILL 11)4AD
; nag
e g r -Z_ A rs-
Reviewer/inspector Name W.!�"
Reviewer/11 nspector Signature:
Date: W 4511=
05IV3101 Continued

P I t
I.Facility Number; 7 — Date of Inspection
QAIM LUM
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge allor below
I iqu i d [eve I o f I agoon or s to rage pon d wi th n o ugi tat ion ?
27. A re there a n y dead an i mal s n ot di s po sed o f pro per] y with in 2 4 h o urs?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? Gc- residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, andlor public property)
29. Is (he land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (ix, broken fan belts, missing Di-
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
3L Do the animals feed storage hins rail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a perinanentJtemporary cover?
0 Yes El No
El Yes X'No
El Yes /�No
0 Yes dNo
El Yes 0
E] Yes ONo
El Yes (:1 No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings -
A,
2 7o
1 A'�9AIX- Pl'
Ac
7 7 —1
A1,7, cOF ANO Z154
AP
-4_4
// 1W
05103101

i,�� � - ;:�
ivision of Water Quafity
Div6ion of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
4., 1.
Type of Visit K Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit xRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other Denied Access
Facility Number Date Uf Visit: [E�� Thne- Printed on: 7/21/2000
rO Not Oecrational 0 Below Thr
Xpermitted [3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: ...... V q ... 5_0 / ... vz�� .... ...................................... County: .......................... .......................
Owner Name:
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address:
Title;
Phone No:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: .... C .................. ..................................................... Integratom.....M.C.-4.. �_ .
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................ ................................ Operator Certiflcation Number: ............. I ............................
Location'of Form:
El Swine Cl I!oultry El Cattle [3 Horse Latitude Longitude 0
Design Current Design Current Design -Current
Z I capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle -capacity. Population
Dairy
Wean to Feeder Layer
Finish Non -Layer Non-Daity
'0'
-r'o
Farrow to Wean
JEI Other
rFumw to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
—,Gilts Total SSLW
Boars
-on A;;a Spray Field Aa�,
NuinWrIoUsmoons fo Subsuri:Z 5rains �resent �La g
'k 'A
He ling Ponds / Solid Traps' aste Management SysteT
I[] No Liquid
DischaKLes A Stream Impac
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: E] Lagoon [] Spray Field 0 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the curiveyance nian-madc?
h, If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State'! (if y0s, notify DWQ)
c. II'discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoonsystem? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State offier than from a discharge?
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? E] Spillway
Sirkcture I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
.............
Identifier . ........... i ... .. .......... .... .................. I ............ ....................
Frechoard (ijiches)- 144
5100
0 Yes KNO
C1 Yes El No
El Yes [I No
D Yes [I No
0 Yes KNo
El Yes KNo
hm
0 Yes A No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Continued on back

IFacility Number:21 — 1(4 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, 0 Yes MNO
seepage, etc.) F-7
6. Are there structures on -site which are nut property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an 0 Y . cs 00
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 0 Yes ACNO
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? 0 Yes RrNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? 0 Yes UrNo
Waste APRIiC2tiOn
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? [I Yes VNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? [] Excessive Ponding [] PAN [] Hydraulic Overload 0 Yes 9INo
12. Crop type Ljl�
12 S;�%
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? [:1 Yes Id No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate a.creage for land application? 0 Yes O'No
b) Does the facility need a weilable acrc deiermination? 0 Yes eiqu
C) This facility is pcndcd for a wettable acre determination? [I Yes 9No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reguired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the fac i I i ty fai I to have a ac I i ve ly certi f icd ope rator i n ch arge ?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
6e/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
LA Ng-tikPitiOn"S"Ri oi�4 0 6 i�l' '41l't, '04, -
wi�rp xi (W g s. t - 0 - ep q OQ ftth�f
..... . .........................
..........................
.... ........................
1C)G
[I Yes X No
0 Yes KNo
[I Yes 5(No
0 Yes EfNo
0 Yes Eff'No
• Yes EfNo
• Yes %No
• Yes b(NO
• Yes KNo
• Yes tj(No
[I Yes. gNo
'i 0
Reviewer/Inspector Name W.MiT MOM. 94Wk, &WWAMIMI 010011%m
Reviewer/Impector Signature: SZ�Ck Date: Ira-' ka
I - __ � vi_ 5/00

Facility Number: [Mic of I uspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issue,.
26. Does (he discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below xye-, 0 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation'!
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 0 Yes x1lo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue (in neighboring vegetation, asphalt, Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property) R
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of (he lagoon? Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (Le. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) El Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins tail to have appropriate cover? Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover'! Yes A No
Additionall. Comments andVoir Drawings;
47;
A,
5/00

�j
V(Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soill and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
"01
Type of Visit )0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
ReasonforVisit )2fRoutine OComplaint OlFollowup 0 Emergency Notification 00ther El Denied Access
F— Facility Number I Duteorviit:
I(Permitted 13Certiried [3 Conditionally Certified 13Registered
.1 X- q 4
Farin Name: ........... :K; "..
.... ...... I ........ . .......................................................
Owner Name: ............. Lnel.il .... ............ .................................
'rime: Prinled on: 10/26/2000
ro No7operational 0 Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold . ......... ...............
County: RvyPJ.t.'.q ........................... ... ... I ...................
Phone No -
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. . Il'ille: ................................................................ ["hone No . .......................................... ........
MailingAddress: ................................................................ .................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: .... ?,A v ke.r . ................................................. ... !� ...... - ................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ........................................................ .... Operator Certification Number: .... .....................................
Location of Farm;
V(Swine [:]Poultry []Cattle []Horse Latitude 0 6 '& Longitude a 6 66
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
El Wean to Feeder JE1 Layer I I Dairy
inish T 73T JE) Non -Layer Non -Dairy
Weeder to F F
0 Farrow to Wean
fgFarrow to Feeder Other
E] Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
[I GIB
[] Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 1 r[—:1,Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area I[] Spray Field Areln�
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps I [E—INo Liquid Waste Management System :J
DischaEg.es & Stream Impac
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Dischargeoriginatedat: E]Lagoon [jSprayField [JOther
a, 1I'dischnrgc is observed, was the conveyance man-niadc'!
K I f d isc harge is observed. d id i t i each Water of the State'! (I f yes, not i fy I)WQ)
c. II'dischurge is obsctvcd. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
(1, Doe� discharge bypass a lagoon syslenil (Il'yes, notify I)WQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part ofthe operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? [I Spillway
StRICIUre I StrULAUre 2 StruCtUre 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
I(tell 6 fie r: ........ K.--q ........... ............ K —. 1,51 ....... ................................... ......... ................ I .... .............................
Free board f i nchcs): q0
5100
El Yes JdNo
El Yes fTNo
El Yes TNO
El Yes 40 No
t"I"'
El Yes 9No
El Yes XNo
0 Yes )@No
Structure 6
Continued on back

lFacility Number: 31 Date of Inspection Printed on: 10/26/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, El Yes No
i seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? D Yes No
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvcment?
D Yes
M No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement'?
Yes
No
9, Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Yes
No
Waste Applicatio
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
[I Yes
No
11. Is there evidence of over application? [j Excessive Ponding [] PAN [] Hydraulic Overload
Yes
No
12. Crop type Co f n Fr, 3 �y re, 5wLA 11 Croulpl
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
XYes
No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
C3 Yes
[I No
b) Does (he facility need a wettable acre deter mination?
C1 Yes
[I No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
Yes
[3 No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvernent?
Vdf Yes
[:1 No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
C1 Yes
[I No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
El Yes
DNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Gc/ WUP, check lists, design, maps, etc.) Y ONo
Y!"
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigaflon, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
XYes
No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'?
0 Yes
No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
Yes
ONo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
Yes
No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
El Yes
No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes
No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
[I Yes
No
.*i01'a(i0jjs'oi, d�fjt:Wndo$ -W�ri� hofpd- OtWift s.v s t - ip �wj - ep i i� ijq t
C . 011 LS.V1 I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or'any othe� ibm:m'enti�
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): t
13. Crowe.- Jlek.$ o� I;cd oil s'e, bcelvv et,,iA ip- rye Ay4e-4,14s
( -r--AC+ 3-511 pleX 1 171 LA4 7;-A-(,+ 34 1 Fie-1A 1) &*-r wk�el� 64.11t, )..S4
Corr% As ct rece-io 6v-6)p ;h 4�e (AA -C& r lq ri ,
IS. . -rlie�-a iS ot crAf I e A eU 1 P4 'e! ve cA 's )n pet r 4-S oi-' sp im 7 ArTA, k' y4.-.1lP14S
I WL05 -Cvor
,ei v' Ow ee
z Irlie ree M j 4o be- %ove
eov- 4 e At reo, 0 e Pi ems -6 te 4 edvc� ed I ki L%w4e p k 1-t c%� v%,4 ein Z, S
e) md ;4 Aocs AP mcc,�4 -�,, be eki - &0h;P;AUe'4)
I I
Reviewer/Inspector Name 15?0 �Ie Wet I I - Nor) h I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 911
Date: 112
.5/00

Facility Number: 3 ) L17161 Date of linspection Printed on: 10/26/2000
T6 1 V77-7 176
Odonlsosues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below gYes El No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? Yes PrNo
28. Is (here any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e, residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, El Yes 9NO
Toad s, b u i I d i n g s truc t ure, an d/or pu b I ic propert y)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ;kYes El No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation, fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc,) El Yes $No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? El Yes 5 No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/lemporary cover? 16 Yes El No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
IS% 6rowe,- JiAr A)o1w1,-eo( 0" r C 0." A V-A V)JI rl �--j A
Ae. 4; �,,e ye 6f 06 4,0 b er- 44 �,ftt/ Aio Y, e- �1 k �- #'i -Z 1,30 0 0 n
1, 0 VA Or A I A eet �4-f 1 2 3 o 1p v- J 4-v (i Av r, rw r � c er-op
f Ot
-P 14,44cA Nki., is Ae �ec,'Pf 1;4 Als'f/ H�4.'--MO q ,pp"f'.r
4-o kowe, oxa Y,�,e r1AP14P-,4- PIS 6 jd,,,,JM+5 17 s4; 11 t-)auve,
4�e' �Tr tA, .-EeAVIJ need 4e be hqrveskA A<np , &,ot
rr nceAs q.-CAS
'er)d r4 -J-'qVJVCJr1� Z401
k be- Aepa
as 15 n / ber, k- hre, r ^1,4o Av r X f o, �c-
AJ eek roL s Jr- Ce r aco r4,r U-s e (p wot flo 011 yi A S I' T d4 rCA
Lv t 11 0(4� J 46� a-11P I I- CA 4 1'418-1 01 737e R— -Z 'XI
7- -rl e&4-,q 41'o ri dev 4 e er t., 44 e -<yrkv1,% ; m 4,q ke �Pi Ae /akyrah
AJ -P-4 A I I rRem.9v -eO di --,q4e 01
-P"e-14 ;7eb. zoo) -
N04c:
r; e I Aj e �e 4e t-1 -e�ww-f /5
C e"e S A I -C'57 J w f A--t 4 S ei;� 11 iritld I
cis- q, ALIrS t4lb* L4--'k-rkLft411 �4�-f S-1, rel-e-f-44 ' At 1 19 ' A
Recov,ds �iec,4 �e te "�l 4WOrC(OC-C VV;qk W'Is-fe Flom
Ck C %r61A- C
0
reltj,,14401 4o ;�vcjvde jorepee qer eDe4kA4
j( br cliviA liave all oeapr
5/00

in � ti' :: ,
k 13 Division of Soil aid Water, Conser a (in - Operation RevkW
V
E3 DivWon of Soil and Watei Conservation - Compliance Inspection,
ction
Division of Water Quality m Coinplianom Inspe
%.. 1. Al W,
ation: ev ew
Other Agency Oper
Routine 0 Complaint _O Follow-up of DW2 inspection 0 Follow -tip of DSWC review 00ther
Facility Number Date 0, Inspection
Time olAnsptelion 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered IQ Not Opera7tion- 'site Last Operated:
'is a
............ ..........
. .. ... ..
. .... .. . If ee ..........
Farm Name: ........... ....... ......... .......................... county . .......... Ot ...... I ................
'me: .... .. ........ I ............. Phon . . .....
Owner M e No:
Facility Contact. .. ..... ..
. ................................ ... ......... Phone No: ..........................
Mailing Address: ................... .............
Onsite Representative:...., _lg . . ............. . . ......................... ................... Integrator . ......................................................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Location of Farm:
................. I ........ I ............. ­..... ......... I ......... ...... ............................................................................................................................................................................... A�
.......... . . ............................. I .......... .................................. ........................... . . . . ................................. .........
Latitude 0 4 11 Longitude 0 6 Ed
Design Current Design Current Design 'Current.
Swine Poultry att[6
Capacity Population Caoiicity Population. C Capacity Population
n Wean to Feeder Layer Dairy
Feeder to Finish Non -Layer Non-Dai ry
Farrow to Wean
Other
Farrow to Feeder.
Farrow to Finish Total -Design. Capacity
Gilts,
Total SSLW
El Boars
Number 6f Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present 11E] Lagoon ;�rLa I[] Spray Fie
Holding:Ponds Solid Traps
E�== JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharaus & Stream Impac
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon E] Spray Field El Other
V
a. If discharue is observed, was the conveyance rnan-made?
0
K If discharge is observcd, did it reach Water oftlic State? (If yes, notil'y DWQ)
c. If di.scharge is observed, what is the estirnatcd flow in gal/min?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Ifyes, noLify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? [I Spillway
Stru -tur, I
Identifier: (k-'s)
Freeboard (inches): ........ .76
Structure 2 SMICIUre 3
..................... ..............
Structure 4 Structure 5
0 Yes A No
[3 Yes No
El Yes No
El yes No
El Yes No
0 Yes No
[] Yes No
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of thestruotures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
0 Yes X No
r,x
Continued on back

IFacility �umbcr- 31 Date (if I nspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any ofthe structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintcriance/improvement?
9. Do any siuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Wa%lc Application
10. Are thcreany buffers that need main tenance/i mprovement?
11. Is [here evidence of over application? [:] Excessive Ponding [I PAN
12, Crop type
El Yes
[ANo
El Yes
MNo
F—%
El Yes
17L No
0 Yes
[A No
El Yes
CK No
0 yes
VINu
13. Do [he receiving crops differ with those designalcA4 the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facilily is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents;
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available7
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the Orne of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'!
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0.. . . : F _F I I ................... * .....
NO-00atiotispr cknipjo "r0a0ed. OWMg �hjs'vj.s1t'- Yoo)-�flj-tepoi*o rid fufthi�r
............. ................
...........................
coir�s�6tidehc'e'. abo*uk thL'S'.Visit., ......
0 Yes KNO
0 Yes No
Yes No
El Yes No
El Yes No
El Yes No
El Yes 14 No
0 Yes KNo
IM Yes El No
Piz
El Yes 0 No
0 Yes P<No
El Yes KNo
0 Yes No
0 Yes No
0 Yes' No
a lous or"a�!:!y'o:::&r-coix 666. i[,
Comments (refer to question #): Explaip any YES answers and/or any'; re6mmie6d t*
Use drawings 4 fac'ility to better x ain sltuatious-'1�4s� addidonal. pages� a'ismecessary).
OL 4me
571-
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Sign!. Date;
3/23/99

Fac.ility.Nurnlber: Date of Inspcction
Odor Issues
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge aL/or below —EJ-YtT—tJ'M
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of property within 24 hours? El Yes A No
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, El Yes 9N 0
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29� Is [he land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? El Yes K" 0
30. Were any major mai - ntenance problcms with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 0 Yes Jff No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 0 Yes krNo
�.o the flush tanks lack a submerged fi I I pipe or a per.manent/temporary cover'?
0; 1- J.
Additiona omments an or. ra" ing �12 r 1-.1.

.......... . . .
.. . ... .. ..... .
......... .
on of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency
E3 Div, 11
V'-
ODivisi
on of Water Quality
1WRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-ne of DW2 inspection 0 Follow-upof DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspect ion
I - Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hb:mm)
E311egistered 13Certified [3Applied for Permit j(Permitted 113N ot Operational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: L
.... V:1.0 ... ............................ ................ County . ...... . . .............................. ......................
Owner Name: ......
........ . ... ...................... I ....................................... Phone No: . .................................... I ........................................
Facility Contact -
Title:
Phone No:
Maili-tig Address: .............................................................................................................. ...... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:.94� .. 7 ... Y�4.. . .................... .............. .......... Integrator: .... 5 ... .................................
Certified Operator-,
Operator Certification Number ................... ....... ..............
Wc9tion of Farm;, "I n
. . ... . ...... .... ... ................... I ....... I .... .............. .
.. ............................... ..... L .... ................. .. .............
..................... . ...... rV
. .... ........ .... ....... - .............................................................
Latitude Longitude
!Design - Current
Desiku Current Design Current
Swine Capacity" Population
Poultry Capacity PopuMtion Cattle Capacity Population!
El Wean to Feeder
El Layer I El Dairy
Wee—Ae r to Fn--ish =0
0 Non -Layer 1[:]_Non-Dairyl I
0 Farrow to Wean
... .... ... ..
0 Farrow to Feeder
I0 Other ..........
gF ow to Finish JY0
...
TotAbesian:Capa'efty .
0 Gilts
ff Boars
Total SS LW
Number of. L. agoons HoldingiPonds Present K] Lagoon rea 10 Spray
: I0 Subsurface Drains=
... ...... ...
.. .. . . . ......... ..... .
10 No Liquid Waste Management System= . . ... ... .. ......
General
1.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
0 Yes
KNo
2.
Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
0 Yes
XNo
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon 0 Spray Field 0 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
0 Yes
No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes.. notify DWQ)
0 Yes
No
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVFnin?
M-
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon sys(em? (if yes, notify DWQ)
0 Yes
P(No
3.
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
0 Yes
No
4.
Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
0 Yes
E4 No
5.
Does any part of the waste management systern (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
�(Yes
O'No
maintenance/improvement?
6.
Is facility no( in compliance with any applicable setback criteria ill effect at the time of dcsign?
0 Yes
ZNo
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
0 Yes
VNo
7/25/97

tacility Number: .3 .. I ..... ..73.6-
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. D i d the fac i I it y fa il t o ha ve a cc rtifi ed operator in res po ns ib le cha rge?
0
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Yes
Str3jejures (Lagoons and/or Holding ej2nds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
0 Yes to No
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
....... . .... . .......... .... . .............. .. .... . .... . ........ . ....
.................. ......
10, Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Yes R No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
0 Yes 9NO
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Jq Yes 0 No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Yes No
Wa5j!LApplicUtj2n
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
Yes No
(If in excess of W P, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
Z
15. Crop type — .&LY...i. - j . . .... . .......... . ................. . ............... .......... .... . ................ . .............. . .......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
[:]Yes No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
O.Yes
ZNo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Yes
0 No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
0 Yes
19 No
20, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0 Yes
"No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss rcviewlinspection with on -site representative?
El Yes
VNo
FQr Caffled Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
El yes
Ed No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
[j Yes
ONo
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
0 Yes
[I No
...... ....
ti
Coffirninti'(refeitoqu6k n ft. Exp ain any YES ani�w ers and/or any recommendi ormor any, other comments.
ons
it6ati .'(,Lj�seadditiona pages:as,neces
ty ie
se mgsoff�clli i s
Out-,
ri C_-
0—tAV
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: V�_19RY
cc. Division of Water Qualily, Water Qaality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

.T
tio
DSWC-Ahima Redlot era n Reyiew'­.,�,'.M.
S"
W. . ... ....
AWQkAftirnal: Feedlot, Op'e'ra tion e 1110-eci- ti on
0 Routine !$ Complaint 0 Follow-up of UW2 inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
FucifityNumber D--==- -1
I- Time of Inspection E� Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: .... a'.6L't� Total Time (in hours) Spent onRevie1v
or Inspection (includes travel and processing')
Farm Name:
'Llk County: .... . &AjA ... . ..... . ..... . ..... . ....
OwuerName: ... Flo—_ Phone No:.(AjQ)_215__-_-
. jas4li_ 3-
Mailing Address.. flGk�LVLPkA �itae' . .. . ....
Inte(gratbt: ...
Onsite Representative J.JL NA— 9j ..........
Certified Operator- Operator Certification Number: _I -
Location of Farm:
.. .. .... . .... -- -------- . . . ... . ...... . ......
Latitude Longitude
LE3 Nat OEcmrional Date Last Operated:
1'�-p e of 0 p erad on a n d D esign C ap acity
C. tfl
2 e,.­
0 Wean to Feeder
As:" Laver
-"]0 Dairy
C9 Feeder to Fiaish
ZY,-VflQ Non -Laver 1
:10 Beef
[71 Farrow to Wean
..............
U"
E) Farrow to Feeder
z�
j�
El Farrow to Finish
25
t Type Livestock
01: er of
PSubsurface Drains Present
��Spray Field Area
JOLa oonArea
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the opern6on?
a. If discharge is observed, Nvas the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is obsmed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Is there evfdence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? -
D Yes 0 No
El Yes
19 No
[3 Yes
0 No
El Ye;
ON, o
M/A
0 Yes
[Z No
El Yes
191 No
El Yes
X No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require Yes El No
maintenance,limprovemem?
Coniinued on ba��k

6. Is facility -no't in c- o-mpliancc with any applicable setback criteria?
7. Did the facility fail to bave a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after I/l/97)?
8. Are there lagooris or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures La ondsl
_f __ZQnns and/or 11oldinLE___
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): La oan I Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
10. Is seepage observed' from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement2
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat� notify DWQ)
13. Do an�­of the" structties. lack adquate markers to identify start a6d stop pumping levels?
Waste A
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWO)
15. Crop type ....... L.1�.A:L ........ I�L . .....
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequite acreage for land application?.
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities On1v
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does thi� facility ib�l'to- comply with the Animal Waste Manage ment Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility requirea follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewe��spector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with owner or operator in cba.-ge?
0 Yes
No
El Yes
1PNO
[I Yes
No
El Yes
No
Lagoon 4
0 Yes
19 No
El Yes
12 No
JQ Yes
[9 No
El Yes
No
Ej Yes
NO
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
0 Yes
[Z No
C Yes §3 No
Yes El No
Yes ID No
0 Yes CK NO
El Yes 19 No
rnmentsl reflertoquestion-#'��Ex cy anyrecommen
or aitio"His-16'r anyother.�
--lain siftiatioal e;addftioffd,P4ges1ds d6cEis�.
Usediiiwi�g§,Ioffi6ili �etter e#
S�O
odKit- 80",Gk. C,611rals u� �e
U
S Use Qj"
I(Pjzi. TL cxwm� �6yke�, CXV-V� OJJ C=s�� b�NUCL h�rt 4v- A"t COVW- cq�,
f-�,e �-b5 t A �V *&, pt&"�
'Nm
V
Reviewer/Inspector Name rr M.
Reviwer/Inspector Signature:
tX lit
rc.- Division of Water Onalim. Water Onaliti, Section Fariftti Assessment Unit I TITII/QA

all:
J
ra
-Ani Feedlof.Q& tion Si
QbWQ- riat te:1nsP�qjj()n.:`;
7.
Routine S Comnlaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-uo uf Dswc review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number Time of Inspection J!j 1 :]Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: ... Total Time (in hours) Spent onRetiew
or Inspection (includes travel and proc6sing)
Farm Name: --- I V �. --� - 5- Countv:..-- . .....
L
Owner Name: ... Phone
Nlailing Address: 17-L
Onsite Representative: _RLIE Integrator: .... 6�� Mijivi ... . . ...
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farni-
Latitude Lonvitude F--17-70
FE37777) t 0 p c r Date Last Operated:
r)*Pe of Operadon and Design Capacity
C; e
try 2
", 7-9,!4 -i utn tLM
Wean to Feeder
Laver
gi"]O Da
(A Feeder to Fiaish
�ZU5 10 Non -Laver I
Beef
Farrow to Wean
:Q-' -
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
er Type of Livestock
A": 77
LQ Subsurf2ce Draias Present
t
iQA i�
1[3 Lagoon A El �Spra �Fiel� A �ea
r =ea �a.
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/irnprovement? 0 Yes No
2. Is any dischargr observed from any part of the operation? El Yes No
a. If discharge is observed, Nvas the conveyance man-made? El Yes '91 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface 'AratcO (If Yes, nctii� DWQ) 0 Yes 0 No
c. If discbarge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin? -- MLA --
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notif�, DWQ) Yes [z No
Is there evidence of past discharge from any pan of the operation? El Yes [P No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes ;K No
S. Does any pan of the waste management system (other than lagoons�bolding ponds) require K Yes El No
maintenanceiimprovemcnt?
CoAtinued on back

6. Is f;ici-1i-t'y':n"o't in 6--mpliancz with any applicable setback criteria?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after I/l/97)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures -(Lat!oons and/or HoldiALjDndsj
9. Is structual froeboard. less than adequate?
Frccboard (ft): L:?oon I Laeoon 2
Lagoon 3
10. Is seepage observed'from any of the structures?
11 Is era s ion, or any other threats to the i ategri ty of any o f the s truc tures ob served?
12. Do any of the structures need maintrnance/improvement?
(It any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation Poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do ank-of the" stnt&dres lack adquate'rnarkers to identify start aiid stop pumping levels?
NVaste ApplicaCion
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type —iLaw-�A-
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequite acreage for land application?,
18. Does the cover crop need improvernent?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
Fnr Certified Facilities OuIv.
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does d; facility kh][1 -tc� comply with the Animal, Waste Man-age*m-c'nt Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did ReviewedIzspcqor fail to discuss revi�wfmspection with owner or operator in charge?
0 Y; s
ONo
0 Yes
NO
0 Yes
IN No
Yes
W No
Lagoon 4
El Yes
ONO
El Yes
19 No
IQ Yes
NO
0 yes
No
Yes
No
0 Yes C1 "\To
El Yes IKINO
El Yes [2 No
0 Yes EZ No
E3 Yes
50 No
Yes
El No
Yes
R3 No
[3 Yes
0 No
0 Yes
0 No
Ael - 6S CJ CNA woAu,' 6-Jcrie� unvurtej
fu./V. Ulwm� COym DJ CWSW ,Xyml 6� 4, otr- Cm
be 4\
41-j Assis�rf-e
Reviewer/Inspector Narne . . . . . . a,
Reviwer/Inspector Signature:
c-c: DivLsion of Water Oualim. Water Oualitt, Section Facftim, 4rsessmenf Unit 11114/96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality F,
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretal
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.F.,
Craig King
King Farms K-4 & K-5
126 Garland King Rd
Teachey NC 28464
Dear Craig King:
4UG 2 5 1998
August 19,1998
NCDENR
Nc*rrH CAROLINA DEPARTmr-wr or
F_NV1R0NMF_r,rT AND MvuRAL RESOURCIES
Subject: Application No. 31-0467
Additional Information Request
King Farms K-4 & K-5
Animal Waste Operation
Duplin County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject
application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following
components by September 18, 1998: 1
1) The site maps that were submitted with the permit application do not contain the locations and
acreage's of the Fields listed in the Waste Utilization Plan (ATUP). Please provide a map that
includes this information.
2) The WUP narrative of operation states that " Wheat can also be planted as well as can soybeane'.
Please include a statement that if a soybean crop is used, residual nitrogen will be accounted for in
the crop following the soybeans. Please also include the application times for these crops.
All revisions / amendments are required to be signed and dated by both the landowner and the Technical
Specialist before they are submitted for review. Please reference the subject permit application number when
providing the requested information. All information should be signed, scaled, and submitted in duplicate to my
attention at the addrcss below. The information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before
September 18, 1998 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 1.5A N.C.A.C.
2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is
a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the
Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 364.
cc5W1Iffii6�n.RFgid _"WaterQuality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Ralelp.11, North Carolina 27826-0535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Sincerely,
Brian E. Mondschein
Environmental Technician
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

84e Re4uires
Iffirn.odiate AtlenTIO
DIVISION OF ]ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 7
'ANIMAL FEEDLOT OP-Ekil�l'fOiN�S'SITE-VI-SITATIO��-RECOR.D,
DATE: 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Ownev e 10. W A-, G= Aj
Mailing Address: ___L2
County:
Integrator: Phone -
On Site Representative Phone: -;?-,s
Physical
0 Jr,49
Type of Operation— Swine Poultry Cattle,.
Design Capacity: _&Q_D f�,ZYII Number of Animals on Site-
4—
DEM Cerdfication Number-. ACE DEM Cerdfication Nuai*: ACNTW—
Elevation: ___Fee.t
Latitude: e' Lf-?" Longitude:
Circle Yes or No
Does the, Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot -f- 25 yt�ar 24 hour storni cvcitc
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) 9 or No Actual Freeboard: __Q___Lnchcs
'2D
Was any seepage otismed from thelagoon(i)? Yes -v�e -C
10�RC:)>as any erosion obsti d7 Ycsoi
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequatf,-" Yes orc"D
Cmp(s) being utilized.
Does the facility meet SCS minimurn :settack-c�riiteria? 200 Feet ftom D wellings? or No
100 Feet from WeIIS9 e. or No
Is the an imal waste stockpil�d',within 100 Feet of U S GS Blue Li ne S trea'm? Ye s.or- No
Ye or CP
Ii anir�l waste I�nd,,dpplied (jr spi�y irrigated withi 25 Feet of- a US GS., Map Blu'e­ Line? s N.T
!Is animal 141aste dischar r1l; of -the sta te -by mian_ -miade ditch, fl U6 shing. sy�tern� , oi-. oth tr
.ged into wate
similar rhan-ifiade'devic6s? §e7�W 140-1 if Yes, Please Explain. -,ta4
Does the fac�iiy mal 6'taiin adequat� )Waste. niaina 11'e.ruent records (vol unle-s of rnanur'�e.. Ian d a�pliLd,
spray inigated-bbn specific acf6ag6,Wfth ic'over crop)? Yes.0
-,P
g ArZ
JV
ir
Dou
q lat
�anae
Inspwor
cc: Faci L ty A ssessrmnt Ur�t Ust- Attachme-ats if Needcd.
A0

U7�1,8/95 16:27 %T9102962122 USDA NRCS Q008
0
Site Requires Immediate Attention
Facility Number: 31- q]
SITE VISITATION R.ECOR.D
DATE: -7-13 1995
Owner: Crg�% ktt-g� Farm Narne: -A
County:
Agent Visiting Site: r-Q 2� Phone- 21-d- 2 7� - Z � 2
Q
Operator: Phone.
On Site Representative: Phone.
Physical Address: 6�\- ZM Mw�je— et i.iaX.
F F
Mailin- Address: 12 (P —go4� c,.n 9 'k IA-t4 Pi
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: I-A�Q aO Number of Animals on Site:
Latitude. Longitude: k
Type of Inspection: Ground Aerial
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste La-oon have sufficient frecboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
0
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) �&r No Actual Freeboard: --L Feet --9— Inches
For fac ilities with more than one J agoon, please address the o ther I agoon s' freeboard under the
corrtments section.
Was any seepage observed from the lazoon(s)? Yes ord!PWas there erosion of the. dam?: Yes Oro
Is adequate land available for land application? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Ye5 or No
Additional Comments:
Fax to [phone]
Signawre of

Affl�
HCDEHR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Bevedy Eaves Perdue
Governor
Craig King
King Farms K-4 & K-5
126 Garland King Rd
Teachey, NC 284649736
Dear Craig King:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
December 21, 2010
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subj ect: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310467
King Farms K-4 & K-5
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin County
In accordance with your December 17, 2010'request in change in operation type without increasing the
permitted steady state live weight, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC)
issued to Craig King, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management system in
accordance with General Permit AWG 100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the King Farms K-4 & K-5, located in Duplin County, with a swine animal capacity
of no greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 2632 Feeder to Finish: 1280 B o a r/ S tu d: RM. 0 J3:1 VJ'a:
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other: DEC 2 9 2010
JBY:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each s
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be,
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS310467 dated October 1, 2009. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this CDC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please Day careful attention to the
record keei2ina and monitorim,, conditions in thispermit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
1636 Mail Service �entar, Raleqh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location ' 2728 Capital Blvc., Raleigh. North Carolina 27604 on-�
Phone-. 919-733-3221 � FAX: [phone] � Cusiamef Service: 1-87-623-6W NorthCarolina
Internet vpAm.nmaterqUali�.org
A-) E q ui!.l OpDorm nity % AM rmative k1jorl F m pio Ve�r Natullall
b

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey. ari), property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundM,. Per NRCS standards a 100-fool separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or anv wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C inchiding civil penalties, criminal penalties. and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must he submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition 11.212 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning
or a Flood Wat�h associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Newport/Morchead City, NC
�i��tionavl -Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at:
www.erh.noaa.gov/6r/mhx/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at (9) 0) 395-3900. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit. please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AW G 100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc-.;)
E�Ejffiii�gjjoLR�gional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Duplin County Health Department
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWS310467)
AFO Notebooks
Mutpby-Brown, LLC
-A

31-4(ol
PRODUCER:
LOCATION:
TELEPHONE:
TYPE OPERATION:
Craig King 4&5
126 Garland King Rd,
Teachey, NC 28466
[phone]
Existing Combination Swine Farm
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 1860
(Design Capacity)
RECD APR 0 9 2009
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients In the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops In the fields where the waste Is
to be applied.' This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all
plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown,
'Several factors are Important In Implementing your waste ufillzatlon plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that It Is applied In an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
Important as -they have d ' Iffereni Infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it
is raining, or when the surface Is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters which Is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditlons should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a
growin6 crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the
waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste Is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. Attached you will find Information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, If carded out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
RECEIVED / DENR / DVvQ
Page I Aqui* PrOtertion %�Prhon
APR 0 3 2009

1,860 animals X - 3,563870968 (tons) waste/animal/year =
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
1,860 animals X 3,609677419 lbs. PAN/animal/year
Guide Std. 633)
6,666 (tons) wastelyear.
6,714 lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from N.C.
Tech
Applying the above amount of waste is a big Job. You should plan time and have appropriate
eclulipment to apply the waste in a fimely manner
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field* SoH Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Type Per Acre Utilized Application
T3471
3
NoA
Bermuda(G)
255
2.57
655.35
March - Sept.
T3471
4
NoA
Bermude(G)
255
4.19
1068.45
March - Sept.
T3471
5
NoA
Bermuda(G)
255
8.41
869.55
March - Sept,
T3511
6
NoA
Bermuda(G)
255
2.58
657.9
March - Sept.
T3511
7
NoA
Bermuda(G)
255
1.81
461 .55
March - Sept.
34*
NoA
Small Grain
50
4.39
219.5
Sept. - April
T3471
1
NoA
Wheat
144
6.67
960.48
Sept, - pril,
T3471
1
NoA
Corn
130
6.67
867.1
March - August i
T3471
1
NoA
Soybeans
150
6.67
1000.5
June - Seel.+
T3471
2
NoA
Wheat
144
6.67
960.48
L"L.
T3471
2
NoA
Corn
130
-6.67
867.1
March - August
T3471
2
NoA
Soybeans
1501
6.67
1000.6
J u-ne - Sept.+
Total 27.911 5,760.30 1—
see narrative for small grain details "based on annual average for
two vear rotation on fields 1,2
*This N Is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N MUst be based on reilUafic VLeld e=actation,
NOTE. , The applicator Is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirements. Beginning In 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers In some
eastern counties of North Caroline to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients.
This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2

r,
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Type Per Acre* Utilized Appil
* See footnote for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 27.91 6,760
Table 2 0.00 -
Total 27.91 6,760
Amount of N Produced 6,714
Surplus or Daflclt (46)
NOTE., 'rho Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions thr periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over
application of nutrient or other elements.
Page 3

See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field Soil Type Crop Application Application
No. Rate (In/Hr) Amount (In.)
3-7
NoA
Bermuda
0.5
-5-1.0
1,2
NoA
Row Crops
0.5
.5-1.0
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE WILL
BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility Is designed for JL0 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every q MONTHS. In no Instance should the volume of
waste being stored in your structure exceed Elevation *sejIagoon_qe§1gn.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil, Conservation Service) or Soil
and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance In
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the
waste.
Narrative of operation: This Is a "wetted acresm plan, combining two existing facilities,
Each pull Is listed as a field. Only 4.39 acres of bermuda must be overseeded In small grain each
vear. More mav be Dlanted If desired. but onIv 4.39 acres is reaulred.
Page 4

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water Is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste, If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of
an agreement with a landowner who Is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the
use of the land for waste application. It Is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change In the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3 Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soll type, available moisture. historical data, clImatic conditions, and level
of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land that Is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per
year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG
Standard 393 - Filter Strip).
5 Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or diskIng after waste appkation. Waste
should not be applIed when there Is danger of drift from the Irrigation field.
6, When anlmal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, It will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland,
the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding, (See "Weather and Climate In North Carolina" for guidance.)
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil Infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsIte or to surface waters and In a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No pondlng should occur In order to control odor or flies.
Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
Page 5

in, r2ti,
-zo
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops In such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would Inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Waste nutrients shall not be applied In fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a
high potential for leachIng. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste
shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste Is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other than an Irrigation ditch or canal, Animal
waste other then swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995). shall not be
applied closer then 25 feet to perennial waters, (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied In a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
.1
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged Into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly Into water
courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that courses no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged Into the animal waste management system.
Page 6

. . . ...... . .. ........ ..
PIS
If
L ?".i
.... ...... .
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced as necessary to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be Inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility Is to be suspended or terminated, the owner Is
responsible for obtaining and Implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an Illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping pumps, reels, etc., should be Inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leeks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used In a rotation that Includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, If animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption It should only be applied pro -plant with no further applications animal waste
during the crop season.
21, Highly visible markers shall be Installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22, Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
of crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metal approach excessive levels, pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23
Dead animals will be disposed of In a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
Page 7

c'.7Zj Ac
Name of Farm:
Ownerl Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and Implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established In the approved animal waste utilization plan for the
farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the
new animals are stocked, I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less
severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm
office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by DEM upon request,
Name of Facility Owner: !:��
(Please prino
Signature:v Date:
U
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (please ptino Kraig A. Westerbeek
Affillation: MUT�y Family Farms
Address (Agency): . P.O. Box 759
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Signature: Date: -7 -
r7'01 '0 -a'
Page 8

\N A
P,
liar
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
North Carolina Department of En vironment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
1r:1 71-
July 1, 2007 R-ECE 'LVIE:D
Craig King
King Farms K-4 & K-5 JUN ?, 6 2007
126 Garland King Rd
Teachey, NC 28464-9736 BY:
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310467
King Farms K-4 & K-5
Animal Waste Management System
Duplin County
Dear Craig King:
In accordance with your application received on 20-Feb-07, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Craig King, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
management system in accordance with General Permit AWGIOOOOO.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal wastc as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the King Farms K-4 & K-5, located in Duplin County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 1280 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 580
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007, You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition 111. 19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be compieted prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised fonns used for record keeping and reporting. Please Ra
careful attention to the record keeping -and -monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncw4tQNuality,gM Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
A n Eq ual OppDrtu n itylAffirmative Adon E mplayer— 50% Recycled/1 M Post Consumer Paper
AN'thCarolina
NatafflAy
Raleigh. NC. 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules,' st4ndirdi, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any prop�rty rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility. -- - - ' ��
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0 111 (c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field,
Per 15A NCAC. 02T .1306, any containment basiri, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or.change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection staff may be reached at 910-395-3900. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at (919) 733-
3221.
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG 100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ec's)
Duplin County Health Department
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS310467

W 140sp *05
PRODUCER: Craig King 4&5
LOCATION: 126 Garland King Rd.
Teachey, NC 28466
TELEPHONE: [phone]U��C-�EJVMEU
J6m 0 5 2007
TYPE OPERATION: Existing Combination Swine Farm
lay.,
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 1860
(Design Capacity) I
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is
to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all
plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown,
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities, Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
ap pl i ed to land erod i ng at u p to 10 tons per yea r. Do not apply was te o n sa tu rated soi Is, wh 0 n i t
is raining, or when the surface Is frozen. rmither of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems, To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a
growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the
waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility, Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analyslis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out. meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
21-1.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission,
Page 1

1,860 animals X 3.5638ZQ96 (tons) waste/animal/year =
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
1,860 animals X 3,509677419 lbs. PAN/animal/year
Guide Std. 633) -
6,666 (tons) waste/year.
6,714 lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from N.C.
Tech
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field* Soil Crop Lbs. IN Acres Lbs. N Month of
# N o. Type Per Acre Utilized Application
T3471
3
NoA
Bermuda(G)
255
2.67
655.35
March - Sept.
T3471
4
NoA
Bermuda(G)
255
4.1 �
1068.45
March - Sept.
T3471
5
NoA
Sermucla(G)
255
3.41
869.55
March - Sept.
T3511
6
NoA
Bermuda(G)
255
2.68
657.9
March - Sept.
T3511
7
NoA
Bermuda(G)
255t
'1.81
461,55
March - Sept.
3-7*
NoA
Small Grain
50
4.39
219.5
Sept, - April
T3471
I
NoA
Wheat
144
6.67
960.48
Sept. - April
T3471
I
NoA
Corn
130
6,67
867.1
March - August
T3471
1
INcA
Soybeans
150
6.67
1000.5
June - Sept.+
T3471
2
NoA
Wheat
144
6,67,
960,48
Sept. - Apr�l
T3471
2
NoA
Corn
130
6+67
867.1
March - August
T3471
2
NoA
Soybeans
150
6.67
June - Sept.+
Total 27-91 L 6,760.30 F
.see narrative for small grain details "based on annual average for
two vear rotation on fields 1.2
*This N is from animal waste only. If nufrienfs from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they m us ( b e accoun ted for, hLmci.5 t b "a s ed oa realls tt"el(t exAgatatLe&
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in sorne
eastern counties of North Caroline to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients.
This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2

Table2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONGTERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Roq u � red only if a perator does n ot own adeq uate Ian d [see
Required Specification 2])
Tract Field Sol] Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Type Per Acre* Utilized Applicatiorm
* See footnote for Table 1.
Totals frorn above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 27.91 6,760
Table 2 0.00
Total 27.91 6,760
Amount of N Produced 6,714
Surplus or Deficit (46).
NOTE. The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutricat rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over
application of nutrient or other elem on is.
Page 3

Se e atta cli e d map sh owing th e fields to be use d for th e utiliza tion of waste water.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field Soil Type Crop Application Application
No. Rate (In/Hr) Amount (In.)
3-7
NoA
Bermuda
.0.5
.5-1.0
1,2
NoA
Row Crops
0.5
.5-1.0
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE WILL
BE NEEDED FCR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every � MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stored in your structure exceed Elevation -*see lagoon design,
Call the local Natural Resources CoAservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or Soil
and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the
waste.
Narrative of operation: This is a "wetted acres" plan, combining two exisfing facilities.
Each pufl is listed as a field. OnIz 4.39 acres of bermuda must be overseeded in small grain eac7
year, More may be elanted if desired, but only 4.39 acres is required.
Page 4

W
=01111948-1649*41 M 14Y.1711111 I Is] M]
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, &ect application, or direct d1scharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited,
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of
an agreement with a landowner who is'within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the
use of the land for waste application. It is the responsIbIllty of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there Is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land,
3 Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but rot exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical date, climatic conditions, and level
of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per
year providing grass filter strips are Installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG
Standard 393 - Filter Strip).
Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application, Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the Irrigation fleld.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland,
the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur oftsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur In order to control odor or flies.
Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, durling rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
Page 5

W,
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth, The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a
high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients, Waste
shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages break�ng
dormancy.
11 Any new swlne facility sited on or after October 1. 1995 shall comply with the following -
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal
waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be
applied closer then 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12 Animal wa ste sh al I not be applied cl oser th an 100 feet to wel Is.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that courses no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
Page 6

5 W MJ, 4s TRI'm
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced as necessary to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be,inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage or discharge.
18 If animaJ production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and Implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping pumps, reels, etc,, should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used �n a rotation that Includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, If animal waste is used an crops for direct human
consumption it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications animal waste
during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element, Zinc and copper levels in the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metal approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23
Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
Page 7

gt�
gq
''.ffl
M
WASTE UTILIZATIOU-PLAN AGREEMEN ,
Name of Farm:
Ownerl Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the
farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system. or construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the
new animals are stocked, I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
anImal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less
severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm, The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm
office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for revIew by DEM upon request,
Name of Facility Owner:
(Please prino
Signature:X L. Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist: (please print)
Affiliation: - Murphy Family Farms
Address (Agency): P.O. Box 759
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Date:
Kraig A. Westerbeek
W 0000,
Signature. Date: -7 --ZC) -01
'0 -,)L-
Page 8

Sheetl
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: Craig King - K4&5
Address: 126 Garland King Rd.
Teachey, NC 28464
Telephone: [phone]
Table 1 - Field Specifications
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
Fie;d of Field
Number (acires)
Soil TVDe Slor)e %
Maximum
Application
Rate
Croo(sl fln/hr)
County: Duplin
Date: 11/06/2002
Maximum
Application
per Irrigation
Cycle
(inches) Comments
1
6.67
NoA
<5
Row Crops
0.4
.5-1
2
6.67
NoA
<5
Row Crops
O�4
.5-1
3
2.57
NoA
<5
Bermuda
0.5
.5-1
4
4.19
NoA
<5
Bermuda
0.5
.5-1
5
3.41
NoA
<5
Bermuda
0.5
.5-1
6
2-58
NoA�
<5
Bermuda
0.5
.5-1
7
1.81
NoA
<5
Bermuda
0.5
-5-1

Sheet.2
TABLE 2 - Travelling Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment: 3" Travellers
Field No. Travel Application TRAVELLANE Wetted Nozzle Operating Operating
Speed Rate Effective Effective Diameter Diameter Pressure Pressure Arc
(111min) (in/hr.) Widthft) Lenath(ft) (feet) (inches) at Gun(Dsil at reel(osil Pattern Comments - Acres oer oull
1
1.62
0.37
270
850
300
1.08
60
95
330
6.67
2
t62
37
270
850
300
1.08
60
95
330
6.67
3
t95
0�5
170
470
300
1.08
60
95
220
2.57
4
IM
0-37
240
520
300
1.08
60
95
330
4�19
5
1.62
1 0.37
270
325
300
1-08
60
95
330
1 3,41
6
1.62
0.37
270
310
300
1 M
60
95
330
2�58
7
1.95
0.5
220
270
300
1.08
60
95
220
1 �81
TOTALACRES=
27.90

Sheet7
CALCULATIONS
Ier Specifications
Sprinkler Type: Nelson 150
Nozzle Size:
1.08 Inches
Sprinkler Pressure:
60 psi
Flowrate(GPM):
182 gpm
Wetted Diameter:
300 feet
Lane Spacings
Desired Spacing (%): 70 %
Design Spacing(feet): 210 *PVC irrIgatlon pipe normally comes in 20' pieces,
so round to the nearest multiple of 20.
Actual Spacing (feet): 240 feet
Actual Spacing (%): 80 %
Application Rate
Application Rate = (96.3xFlowrate)/(3.1415x(.gxradius)squared)
Design App. Rate = 0.31 in/hr
300 degree arc = 0,37 in/hr
220 degree arc = 0.50 In/hr
180 degree arc = 0.61 inthr
Travel speed = 1.605 x Flowrate / Desired application amount x Lane Spacing
Desired app. (in.) =
0.75 inches
300 degree arc =
1.62 fVmln
220 degree arc =
1 .95 ft/min
180 degree arc =
3.25 ftlmln
Velocity = .408 x Flowrate, I pipe diameter squared feet/sec."
"For buried pipelines, velocity should be below 5 feet per second
Pipe size:
inches
Velocity=
#DIV/01 ffisec.
Page 1

map
Sheet8
ACREAGE CALCULATIONS
CRAIG KING - K4&5
7/27/01
Total
EWL#
JZ=
Length
StartEnd
Acres
EiffldA
I
.
.,9(opEnd
11
27o
-
85()
0.77
0.63
6.67
11
13.34
21
M
850
0.77
0.63
6.67
i
31
170
470
0.43
0.31.
2.57
21
10.17
41
240,
520
04731
0.59
4.19
51
2701
325
0.77
0.63
3.41
61
27o
I 310
0.6t
0
2.58
3
2.58
71
2201
270
0.45
0
1.81
4
1.81
I
I
4�
1 27.91
1
Page I

map
4&q
'-��MicZll
-0� W A
F, Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
40
North Carolina Departmant of Environment and Natural Resources
-H
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
August 4, 2004
CERTIFIF-D MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Craig King
King Farms K-4 & K-5
126 Garland King Road
Teachey NC 28464
Subject: Facility Number:31- 467-National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) General Permit
Dear Craig King:
The Division of Water Quality (Division) has been required by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) to develop a NPDES permit program for animal waste management systems.
The Division has developed a general NPDES permit similar to the state Non -Discharge
General Permit that this facility is currently permitted under. Pursuant to the requirements of
North Carolina General Statues §143-215.1, 40 Code of Federal Regulations §122.23, and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency dated May 9, 1994, coverage under the General NPDES permit is required of all
facilities that have had a discharge of wastewater reaching Waters of the State.
According to our records your facility meets the requirement for an NPDES permit based on the
discharge criterion. Please sign and submit the enclosed NPDES Short Form B — Existing
Facility. Please carefully follow the instructions on the form.
Please submit completed enclosed application within 60 days from receipt of this letter. Failure
to submit the application as required may subject your facility to a civil penalty and other
enf orceme nt actions fo r each day the f aci I ity is ope rated fol lowing the due date of th e
application.
If you have any questions about the new NDPES permit, the enclosed applications, or any
related matter please feel free to contact J R Joshi at 919-733-5083 ext. 363.
Sincerely,
M. Paul Sherman, P.E.
Cc: DuELLn,,20o
gunty, Soil and Water Conservation District
. I- -
Vq1'R.V-Reg1 , onal Office, Division of Water Quality
Permit File AWS310467
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail ServIce, Center, Ral6gh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
".A
Intemet hftpV/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
5 0% recycl ad/1 00/6 post -cons urn or pape r

\N A Michacl. F. Easley, Governor
Q William G, Ross Jr., Secretary
No rth Carol i na Dep artme nt 0 f Env ironment and Natu ral Resou rces
> Alan W. Klimek, RE, Director
5 W 11C Division of Water Quality
Craig King October 22, 2004 LOC��TZ 9 2004
King Farms K-4 & K-5
126 Garland King Road
Teachey NC 28464
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. NCA231467
King Farms K-4 & K-5
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment
Storage and Application System
Duplin County
Dear Craig King:
In accordance with your application received on October 19, 2004, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Craig King, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with NPDES General Permit
NCA200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the King Farms K-4 & K-5, located in Duplin County, with an animal capacity of
no greater than an annual average of 1280 Feeder to Finishand 580 Farrow to Feeder swine and the
application to land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If
this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 1, 2007, and shall hereby void Certificate
of Coverage Number AWS310467 dated May 1, 2003, and shall be subject to the conditions and
limitations as specified therein. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the
system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's
CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data
and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production
greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as
provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed General Permit. Since this is a new joint State and
Federal general permit it contains many new requirements in addition to most Qf the conditions contained
in the current State general permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pU careful attsin—tion to the record keeping
and monitorina conditions in this T)ermit. The Devices to Automaticailv Stoo Irrigation Events Form
must be returned to the Division of Water Ouali!y no later than t20 days following receipt of the
Certificate of Coverage. The Animal Facili!y Annual Certification Form must be completed and returned
to the D iv i sion of Water Qual i!y by no later than March I st of each year.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Internet: hi1p://h2o.enr.statc.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh. NC 27604
Phone [phone]
F&x [phone]
Fax [phone]
Customer smice
1-877-623-6748
��pohCarojina
NatiavIly
An E qua 10 ppWu n1tylAffirmalive Adon E rn ploye r — 50% Recyded/ 10% Post Consu rner Pa pe r

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this CDC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of it COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property,
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this CDC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C, the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 122.41 including civil penalties, criminal
penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this CDC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual NPDES Permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this CDC shall be final and binding,
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this CDC or the General Permit, please contact J. R. Joshi at [phone].
Sincere.ly,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit NCA2 00000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County Health Department
Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File NCA231467
APS Files

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
Process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC'Shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilm:ington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information conceming
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sincerely,
id4ll-�
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Duplin County Health Department
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS310467
NDPU Files

0� NN A T�q Michael F. Easley, Governor
,J
ot 0 William G. Floss Jr., secretary
C_ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
7�
3; — Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Cluality
May 1, 2003
Craig King
King Farms K-4 & K-5
126 Garland King Road
Teachey NC 28464
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310467
King Farms K-4 & K-5
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin County
Dear Craig King:
On April 28, 2003,.the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Swine Waste Operation General
Permit AWG100000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extensio'n the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on March 13, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby for -warding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Craig
King, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS310467 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the King Farms K-4 & K-5, located in Duplin County, with an animal capacity of
no greater than an annual average of 1280 Feeder to Finish, 580 Farrow to Feeder swine and the
application to land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If
this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAVRAP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property. AM
MN
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NO 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity ACtIon Employer
Internet httpJ1h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycl" 10% post-consurne r paper

L NOR
4
I. ZA
PRODUCER: Craig King 4&5
LOCATION: 126 Garland King Rd.
Teachey, NC 28466
TELEPHONE: [phone]
TYPE OPERATION: Existing Combination Swine Farm
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 1860
(DesIgn Capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface and/or groundwater, The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is
to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient, Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all
plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it
is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters which is not allowed under OEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a
growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the
waste or d1sking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems,
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility, Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
21-1.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
Vtr - 1)
ac
'el'y r
0V & � OV 9'C'n 0 �4
Page I oR � 3 2ruol

�IT , �AK 1 7
'r, T , 1U1
j- WASTE, I I ZATT 10 N P UA N
1,860 animals X 3,58387096 (tons) waste/animalYyear =
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
1,860 animals X 3,60967741 lbs. PAN/animal/year
Guide Std. 633) -
6,666 (tons) waste/year.
6,714 tbs. PAN/year. (PAN from N.C.
Tech
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equ�pment to apply the waste in a timely manner
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface applicatiom
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Fieid* Soil Crop Lbs, N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Type Per Acre Utilized Application
T3471
3
NoA
Bermuda(G)
255
2.57
655.35
March - Sept.
T3471
4
NoA
Bermuda(G)
255
4.19
1068.45
March - Sept.
T3471
5
NoA
Bermuda(G)
255
3,41
869.55
March - Sept.
T3511
6
NoA
Bermuda(G)
255
2.58
657.9
March - Sept.
T3511
7
NoA
Berrnuda(G)
2551
1.81
461,55
March - Sept.
3-7*
NoA
Small Grain
501
4.39
219.5
Sept. - April
T3471
1
NoA
Wheat
1441
6.67
960.48
Sept. - April
T3471
1
NoA
Corn
130
6.67
867.1
March - August
T34 71
1
NoA
Soybeans
ISO
6.67
1000.-5-1,June
- Sept,+
T3471 1
2 1NoA
Wheat
144
6.67
960.48
Sept. - April
T3471
2 —JNoA
Corn
130
6.67
867.1
March -August
T3471
2 JNoA
Soybeans 1
1501
6.67
1000.5
June - Sept,+
Total 27.911 6,760.30 1"
'see narrative for small grain details —based on annual average for
two vear rotation on fields 1,2
*This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N-nm,-Lt
st.be-Lu.ed on reallstiaykid expegtath2n.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in some
eastern counties of North Caroline to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients.
This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2

.... ...... . ....
7. 1
-01 P
L
MW 113 Idl AN Y
WE I 12Z'
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be aftached)
(Required only If operator does not own adequate land [see
Required Specification 21)
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
* See footnote for Table 1.
pe Per Acre* Itilized- A
Totals from above Tables
Jl Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 2%7.916,760
Table 2 0.00
Total 27.91 6,�60
Amount of N Produced 6,714
Surplus or Deficit 46
NO'rE. The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over
applica (ion of n u frient or o ther elements.
Page 3

...... ... . ...... .
..... .........
......... JZ
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field Soil Type Crop Application Application
No. Rate (WHI-) Amount (In.)
3-7
NoA
Bermuda
0.8
.5-1.0
1,2
NoA
Row Crops
0.5
5-1.0
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE WILL
BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every � MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stared in your structure exceed Elevation *see lagoon design.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or Soil
and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the
waste.
Narrative of operation: This is a "wetted acres" plan, combining two existing facilities.
Each Pull is listed as a field. Only 4.39 acres of bermuda must be overseeded in small grain each
year, More may be planted if desired, but only 4.39 acres is required,
Page 4

yri­ �� . . 1.1%. -1 - JN1tV
le, '4 1 VA4
'E" �J�
-:3. .1 Ail
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application,
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of
an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the
use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3 Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level
of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients,
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be a ppl ied to land that i s erodin g at 5 or more tons, but less th an 10 ton s per acre per
year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG
Standard 393 - Filter Strip),
Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application, Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland,
the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offste or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies.
Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, durIng rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
Page 5

X I �L
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop Is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a
high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste
shall not be applied more, than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
1 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal
waste other than swine waste from facilitles sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be
applied closer then 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12 An 1 m a I was te sh al I not be appl led cl oser th an 100 feet to we 11 s.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner,
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public r[ght-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that courses no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system,
Page 6

'I U MOM !�d
W tomww
, _011,q, M � 14. Mae
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced as necessary to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications animal waste
during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element, Zinc and copper levels in the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metal approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five years, Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years,
23
Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations,
Page 7

Name of Farm: 'A +- 5 - �_,rc,�. .
Owner/ Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the
farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the
new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less
severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm
office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: 0—rc'-, 2" 'K, ,
(Pleaseprint) a N-
Signature..\,/ L .f Date:
I U
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print) Kraig A. Westerbeek
Affiliation: Murphy Family Farms
Address (Agency): P.O. Box 759
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Signature:' Date: -7- -_sC -01
r7/V - -,5,0 -,3,
Page 8

Sheetl
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: Craig King - K4&5
Address: 126 Garland King Rd.
Teachey, NC 28464
Telephone.- 010)2852692
Table 1 - Field Specifications
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
Field of Field
Number (acres)
So-ii Type Slope % Crop($)
County: Duplin
Date: 11/06/2002
Maximum
Maximum
Application
Application
per Irrigation
Rate
Cycte
([rVhr)
(inches) Comments
1
667
NoA
<5
Row Crops
0.4
-5-1
2
6-67
NoA
<5
Row Crops
0.4
�5-1
3
2,57
NoA
<5
Bermuda
0.5
�5-1
4
4.19
NoA
<5
Bermuda
0-5
.5-1
5
3.41
NoA
<5
Bermuda
0 -5-
�5_1
6
2,58
NoA
<5
Bermuda
0.5
-5-1
7
1-81
NoA
<5
Bermuda
0.5
.5-1

Sheet2
TABLE 2 - Travelling irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment: 3" Travellers
Field No. Travel Application TRAVELLANE Wetted Nozzle Operating Operating
Speed Rate Effective Effective Diameter Diameter Pressure Pressure Arc
(ft/min) (in/hr-) Width(ft.) Lenqth(ft) (f eet) (Inches) at Gun(psi) at reel(psi) Pattern Comments - Acres per pull
1
1-62
0,37
270
850
300
1.08
60
95
330
6,67
2
1 �62
37
270
850
300
1.08
60
95
330
6.67
3
1.95
05
170
470
300
1-08
60
95
220
2�57
4
162
0,37
240
520
300
1,08
60
95
330
4.19
5
1-62
0.37
270
325
300
1.08
60
95
330
3.41
6
1 M
037
270
310
300
108
60
95
330
2.58
7
1.95
05
220
270
300
1-08
60
95
220
1-81
TOTAL ACRES
27.90

Sheet7
CALCULATIONS
Sprinkler Type: Nelson 150
Nozzle Size:
1.08 inches
Sprinkler Pressure:
60 psi
Flowrate(GPM):
182 gpm
Wetted Diameter:
300 feet
Desired Spacing (%): 70 %
Design Spacing(feet): 210 *PVC irrigation pipe normally comes in 20' pieces,
so round to the nearest multiple of 20.
Actual Spacing (feet): 240 feet
Actual Spacing (%): 80 %
Application Rate = (96.3x Flowrate)/(3,141 5x(. 9xradius)squ a red)
Design App. Rate = 0.31 in/hr
300 degree arc = 0.37 In/hr
220 degree arc = 0.50 jn1hr
180 degree arc = 0.61 in/hr
Travel speed = 1.605 x Flowrate / Desired application amount x Lane Spacing
Desired app. (in.) = 0.75 inches
300 degree arc = 1.62 ft/min
220 degree arc = 1.95 fUmIn
180 degree arc = 3.25 ft/min
Velocity = .408 x Flowrate I pipe diameter squared feet/sec.**
—For buried pipelines, velocity should be below 6 feet per second
Pipe size: inches
Velocity= #DIV/01 ftJsec.
Page 1

map
Sheet8
ACREAGE CALCULATIONS
F CRAIG KING - K4&5
7/27/01
ITotal
auLLA I YLdtb
I Leaa
IStart End
A=
IField
1 2701
8501
0.77
0.63
6.671
1 i 13-34
21 2701
8507-0,77
0,63,
6.671
i
31 1701
4701
0.43
0.311
2.571
2! 10.17
4, 2401
5201
0.73
0.591
4. 1 '9 1
'5 1 2701 3251
0.771
0.631
3.411
k
61 2701 3101
0.66
ol
2.581
31 2.58
71 220 2701
0.45
01
1.81
41 1.81
2-7.91
1
Page 1

of,
bf 4;
Ww Wk" i
71 lz
I" '..rAq 10'
INV,
Al
­4 V
P'l
14
41
HL
0" i7+
wt d 0
511, 1
kl-4
'rj
A " ' w - j 1v t..q't-
"I A
PWT VU."X,
OP
eIr".
P.
-46
13L"
Ap
-43
.40L
4L
km
v . I I.b . 'j. .?I"
'Nb I
't A
p,-y-W —.yr. ;
. v
'4r
04, v
F
of
41
K, 'VL'
114P
lam,
O.NkL
71 AlLr6l I VIR r
Aq
j? "c - 04
h. 1:
kv;

I
Or- A-s
Wettable Acres Determination Cer0cation
Name of Facility: - LAI -1� Facility Number:
Owncr(s) Narric, ck:,- PhOD r, NID:a% 9
Mailing Address: Lx�l
By signing this form, the facility owner and Techxiical Specialist acknowledge the completion of the
Wettable Acres Lk--temiluation. All necessary Wettable Acre Determination Field Data Sheets and
calculations were completed to conduct a Wettable Acre Deterinination. The facility's Waste
Utilization Plan has been wneridtd as necessary to refect actual wetted acreage. A copy of all
worksheets, calculations, and otber Wettable Acres Dcterininatioii documents, along wi.th the
applicable Waste Utilization Plan and Wettable Acre Deterraination Certification will be filtd with
the local Soil and Water Consmation DistricL A copy will also be kept on site with the Certified
Animal Wasre Manag=cnt Plan. Any future modifications must be approved by z technical
specialist and filed with the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implexuentation. If any
modifications to 1he existinj i pt
_jLiigatio ri sy4Lqgj,qjL,Apy.. new irrigati-9ji c qu�.p Y�L _Hgk rgq,Wre.d to.
__�_dei_uately a4dre_s's' ih_� waste manavment needs of this facility, an Irrigation Specialist or
Professional Engineer has certified the design and installation below.
Owner Name:
161
Ovmer Signatur
Techni cal Speciali s t Name -
Technical Specialist Signature- Date: —I '­ SO -
If assisted by an Irrig-stion Speclalki or Protmional Engineer please read and sign below:
AriimM waste a ppl ication e qu ipment h as be en d esigned or modi fied to apply waste as necessfay to
accommodate the waste managemcm plan and according to NRCS Standards. Animal waste
appli c.at i on eqjAipmew has be en i ris talle d ac cording to NRCS S tand.ards and is ready for use.
Irrigation Specialist/PE Name:
Irrigation SpecialisVFF, Signature- Date:
Submit tWs form to:
Attn: Sonya Avant
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 -Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
WADC - V99
�66 ON No I t" ! 1.1 X�! qN, I N I A �1 6 1 : I' OV, 16! Vir

'i
O�
C'
7
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
December 15, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL 7002 1000 0005 2390 1192
REIURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Craig King
King Farms K-4 & K-5
126 Garland King Road
Teachey, NC 28464
Subject: Remission of Consideration for
Civil Penalty Assessment for
Inadequate Freeboard
King Farms K-4 & K-5
Facility # 31-467
Duplin County
Dear Mr. King:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
On September 29, 2003, a notice was issued to you concerning Inadequate Freeboard and
Consideration for Civil Penalty Assessment. Upon reviewing the submitted records again, the
Wilmington Regional Office has determined that no further enforcement actions will be taken by
the Division for the inadequate freeboard'.
However, the Notice of Violation will remain. The Division Staff does not believe that this
facility was appropriately operated and maintained upon reviewing the records and in
consideration that there was discharge of animal waste to the waters of the State from the facility
this year. Your records show that the lagoon levels on September 30, 2002 were 48 inches at the
K4 lagoon and 37 inches at the K5 lagoon. Lagoon designs on file at Wilmington Regional
Office show a stop pump level of 60 inches for both lagoons. Within the lagoon, the volume
bctween the start and stop pump level is referred to as the temporary liquid storage. The
temporary liquid storage was designed to account for waste generation, rainfall, and extra
washwater that wo uld ent er the I agoon d uring periods when conditions are not suitable to irrigate
the liquid onto a growing crop. Most lagoons were designed to have 180 days of temporary
storage. In order to have this storage potential for the winter and early spring months, it is
important to reach the stop pump level by the end of summer or early fall. * '
V .
As;�h
06 NR
Customer Service., Mailing Address: Telephone. [phone] Location:
1 800 623-7748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax: [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 S ta te Cou de r #52-01 -01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer
5 0 % re cycled / 10% p os t-consumer pa per
h ttp://h 20. a n r. state, n c. us

F_ U.S. Postal Se-rvice
CERTIFIED MA'1L RECEIPT
fr (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided)
r-9
r-q
Cp ;� *� r
, I C 'L7,
rn
ru plostage $
Ln CY Cedified Fee c
C3
p im rk
C3 Fletum Raceipt Fee
(M Modomement Reqvirod)
al Resifted Dellvefy Fee VV
C3 (Endomement ReqtArod)
C3
I'q Tutal Postage & Fees
ru sent
C3
C3 5 - --------- --------------------------- ................
---he
SmW, Apt,
or PO Box Nc�
.... ..... .... a4.
_51y Spw
r P+4
4-&k� A)C—
PS VorM MOO, April 2062 SE'tl R e.VN �;ff [OF 1116 IF UCI i Orl

fnad�quate Reeboard
Craig King
Page 2
December 15, 2003
In the future, please continue to evaluate ways to maintain freeboard levels in the required range.
These methods include, but are not limited to, water conservation practices, adding additional
application sites, updating your cropping systems, adding additional and/or more flexible
application equipment, and maintaining the lagoon levels at the lowest allowable and appropriate
levels throughout the year, Our staff looks forward to continuing to work with you and your
Technical Specialist to evaluate and implement any needed changes to your system.
Again, thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact the staff of our Wilmington Regional Office at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
V
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
CC: Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown, LLC
John College, WiRO — DSWC
Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Kenneth Best, Duplin County Health Department
Non-Ijischarge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
DWQ Central Files
Wi1rn:ifigtdn.Files',3 ls467--1

Lr-n i irims FRAIL nr-kor-le� 1
r-9 (Domestic Mad Only, No Insurance Coverige Prov�ded)
Cr
�O C 0 1�
M
ru Postage
2, 3
Ln CarfFfied Fee
C3
Postmark
C3 Hatur4l Racelpt Foe
C3 (Endorsement Required)
H we,
C3 Rodrided De Fee
a) (Eadomemwt =Vad)
M
ru
C3
C3
r�
0
-A i:-
----------

Jw-
\N A -rj� Michael F.,.Easley, Governor
otu William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September 29, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7002 1000 0005 2390 8917
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Craig King
126 Garland King Road
Teachey, NC 28464
Subject: Inadequate Freeboard
Consideration for Civil Penalty Assessment
King Farms K-4 & K-5
Facility # 31-467
Duplin County
Dear Craig King:
On April 16, 2003 you were issued a Notice of Violation and Request for Information
concerning self reported noncompliant freeboard level(s) in the lagoon(s). We appreciate your
response and submission of the requested information from that letter. Upon review of the
submitted records and in consideration that there was discharge of animal waste to the waters of
the State from the facility, the Division Staff does not ' believe that this facility was appropriately
operated and maintained. Therefore, the Notice of Violation for the self reported inadequate
freeboard level(s) remains and the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) is considering assessment of civil penalties for the'above noted lagoon level violation(s).
If you would like to meet with the Wilmington Regional Office staff to discuss the above
referenced decision, please contact DWQ staff during the week of October 20 through
October 24, 2003 to arrange a meeting at the Wilmington Regional Office; please contact
Chester Cobb, Gale Stenberg, or me at 910-395-3900 to arrange the meeting.
NAM
X*A
N Cb MR
Customer Smy/ce: Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location,
1 800-623-7748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax. [phone] N, Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 State Courie r #52-01 -01 Raleigh, NC 27699�-1617
An Eq u al Op portu n Ity I Affirmat ve Action Employer
50% recycled 110% post -consumer paper
htip�/h2o.enr.statemc.us

6
1;��dequate Freeboard
Craig King
September 29. 2003
Page 2
Be advised that this office is considering assessment of civil penalties for the above noted
violations. These violations may result in civil penalties of up to $25,000 per violation in
accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A(a)(2). You may also be
assessed for reasonable costs of the investigation in accordance with North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.3(a)(9). Your response will be taken into consideration during this
process. Be advised that the Division of Water Quality may take further action in this
matter including injunctive relief and permit revocation.
Thank you again for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact the staff of our Wilmington Regional Office at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
Water.Quality Regional Supervisor
CC: Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown, LLC
John College, WiRO — DSWC
Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Kenneth Best, Duplin County Health Department
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
DWQ Central Files
Wilmington Files 31-467
I
a
-.7 -7 '­­ I

0� �NA
.�'u Q
>
7/14/2003
Craig King
126 Garland King Road
Teachey, NC 28464
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties
for violation of General Statute 143-215.1
Farm, # 31-467
Duplin County
File No. DV 03-024
Dear Mr. King:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Rose Jr.. Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
CERTMMD MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
JUL 2 8 2003
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against K4 & K5 in the amount of
$6586.76 which includes $586.76 in investigative costs. Attached is a copy of the assessment
document explaining this penalty.
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation provided by the Secretary
of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of
Water Quality. Any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement action,
including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following three items:
1. Subrnit payment of the penalty;
Payment should be made to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources. Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further
enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s). Do not include
the attached waiver form- if making payment.
Please send payment to the attention of:
Mr, Daryl Merritt
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
i-a77-623-6748 16 17 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Garclina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01 -01
An Equal OPPOrtunitylAffirmative Action Employer
50% recyc)edl 10% pcst-consumerpapar
htIpY1h2o.9nr-stat&.nc.us
. V77.
AjOA
N76 ENWR
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

am
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a
detailed justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the reasonableness
of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for contesting the
accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment letter. Because a
remission request forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request
must be accompanied by a waiver of your fight to an administrative hearing and a
stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in dispute. You must execute and
return to this office the attached waiver form and a detailed statement which you
believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G. S. 14313-282. 1 (b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from
the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Daryl Merritt
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
and
Rick Shiver
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-2845
OR
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing -
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must request an
administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition to the
Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes. You must file your original petition with the:

Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
AND
Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to:
Mr. Dan Oakley
NCDENR
Office of General Counsel
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
and
Mr. Daryl Merritt
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date stamp (not
a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter being referred
to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect the penalty,
Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations which occur
after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Daryl Merritt at (919) 73 3-5 083, ext. 58 1.
Sincerely,
e
e effr
ffrey 0. Poupart, Supeir­visor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
JOP/ddm
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Rick Shiver, Wilmington Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
C�
StonewaB Mathis, WIRO w/ attachments
File # DV 03-024 w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public Information Officer w/ attachments

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF DUPLIN
FILE NO. DV 03-024
IN THE MATTER OF
CRAIG KING
FINDINGS AND DECISION
FOR MAKING AN OUTLET TO THE
AND ASSESSMENT OF
WATERS OF THE STATE OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
NORTH CAROLINA
WITHOUT A PERMIT
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Jeffrey
0. Poupart, Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit of the Division
of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
1. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Craig King owns and operates the K-4 & K-5, a swine animal operation along
Highway 11 in Duplin County.
B. Craig King. was issued Certificate of Coverage AWS310467 under Swine Waste
General Permit AWG100000 issued pursuant to North Carolina General Statute
143-215.1 on October 1, 1998, effective on October 1, 1998, with an expiration,
date of April 30, 2003 for the operation of an animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and application system.
C. Coriditi on H. 4 of Swine Waste General Permit AWG 100000 states "Land
application rates shaV be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the Plant Available Nitrogen rate for the receiving crop or
result in runoff during any given application." The CAWMP states that no
ponding of waste should occur.
D. On April 4, 2003, animal waste ponding occurred on an application field of the K-
4 & K-5. Animal waste runoff from the application field of the K-4 & K-5
discharged into an unnamed tributary of Oakie Branch. Oakie Branch is class C
Sw waters of the State within the Cape Fear River basin.
E. Craig King had no valid permit for the above described activities.
F. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $586.76.

I"
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Craig King is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to G.S.
143-212(4).
B. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by G.S. 143-215. 1.
C. Craig King violated Condition 11. 4 of Swine Waste General Permit AWG100000
by causing ponding of animal waste.
D. The unnamed tributary to Oakie Branch and Oakie Branch are waters of the State
within the meaning of G.S. 143-215. l(a)(1) pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6).
E. The above -cited discharge constitutes making an outlet into waters of the State for
purposes of G.S. 143-215. 1 (a)(1), for which a permit is required by G.S. 143-
215-1.
F. Craig King may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2) that provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who
0
is required but fails to apply for or to secure a permit required by G. S - 143-215. 1,
or who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or
requirements of such permit.
G. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Craig King
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 14313-282. 1 (b)(8).
H. The Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit,
Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the
Department of Environ-ment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality, has the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
4
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
IT1 DECISION:
Accordingly, Craig King is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
tD C� M
$ �Y, :60 0 for __L of one violation of G.S. 143-215.1 for dischar-in-
If Z� =,
animal waste into the waters of the State without a permit.
$ 200 for —/_ of one violation of Condition H. 4 of Swine Waste
General Permit AWG100000 by causin- pondina of animal
waste.

$ 586.76 Enforcement costs
s TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215-6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in G.S. 143B-2 82. 1 (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of barm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management ConuTiission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
TV / 2D63
(Date)
Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF Duplin
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
PERMIT NO. AWS310467
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADNIINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. DV 03-024
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $6586.76 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality
dated, 7/14/2003 -, the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of
this civil penalty must -be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Quality within thirty
(30) days of receipt of the civil penalty assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission
request will be allowed after thirty (30) days from the receipt of the civil penalty assessment.
This the
day of
F1,11 1101 :1]
TELEPHONE
SIGNATURE
,20

126 GARLAND KING ROAD
TEACHEY, N.C. 28464
910-285-2692
My 29, 2003
Mr. Rick cShiver
N.C. Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regional Off ice
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wiliaington, N.C. 28405
Ref.: Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement
King Farms K-4 & K-5
Facility Number: 31-467
Duplin ODunty
Dear Mr. Shiver:
In reference to your letter dated May 16, 2003, concerning K-4 & K-5 Facility #31-467:
A. Explanation
I misfigured the correct gear ratio, it was #2 and should have been
#3. if I had not made a mistake in calculations, this would not
have occurred.
B. Action Taken
I used a backhoe to block the area and had no more runoff. I checked
the area every 30 minutes for the next two (2) hours and 95% of the
water had dried into the ground. The five (5) ' percent left was where
I blocked runoff and by the next morning it had dried in.
C. Accomplishment of Action
This area has not been sprayed on since. Plans are to build a berm
with a motorgrader before we spray again. It has been too wet from
rainfall and we have not been able to do the work, but, when finished
this problem will not happen again.,
Sincerely,
g
aig K
cc: fi le

,v-
0� \NA��q
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
I North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
- A�: :Ah6 q
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
May 16, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7002 2410 0006 9367 9488
RET
Craig King
126 Garland King Road
Teachey, NC 28464
Subject: Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement
King Farms K-4 & K-5
Facility Number: 31-467
Duplin County
Dear Mr. King:
This is to notify you of violations of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and Swine Waste General
Permit AWG 100000.
On April 4, 2003, animal waste ponding occurred and runoff from an application field of the referenced
facility discharged into an unnamed tributary of Oakie Branch. Oakie Branch is class C Sw waters of the
State within the Cape Feat River basin. The animal waste ponding is a violation of Condition 11. 4 of the
General Permit that states "Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case
shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available Nitrogen rate for the receiving crop or result in
runoff during any given application." The CAWMP states that no ponding should occur. You were
previously notified by letter dated April 10, 2003 that the discharge is in violation of N.C.G.S. 143-215.1
that requires that no person shall make an outlet into the waters of the State without having obtained and
abided by the appropriate permit. This office has not yetreceived your response to the Notice of
Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement letter dated April 10, 2003.
In response to these violations, a written response must be submitted to this office that includes:
a. An explanation of the vi
b. A description of the actions taken to correct the violations and to prevent their recurrence.
A list showing the dates for the accomplishment of these actions.
This office must receive the written response within fifteen days of your receipt of this notice.
You may wish to contact your County Soil & Water Conservation District Office, County Extension
office, a qualified technical specialist, and/or a professional engineer for any assistance they may be able
to provide.
N. C. 01vision of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension [phone] Customer Service
WilmIngton Regional Office Wilmington. NC 2B405 [phone] Fax [phone] NMW

M
Craig King
King Farms K4 & K-5
May 16,2003
Page Two
Be advised that this office is considering recommending assessment of civil penalties to the Director of
the Division of Water Quality for the above noted violations. These violations may result in civil
penalties of up to $25,000 per violation in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.6A(a)(2). You may also be assessed for reasonable costs of the investigation in accordance with
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.3(a)(9). Your response will be forwarded to the Director along
with the enforcement package for his consideration. Be advised that the Division of Water Quality may
take further action in this matter including injunctive relief and permit revocation.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call Mr, Stonewall Mathis at
910-395-3900 ext. 203 or Mr. Steve Lewis at 919-733-5083 ext. 539.
Sincerely,
GL'�_ cu_
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Patrick Fussell, DSWC-WiRO
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown, LLC
DWQ Central Files
DWQ Non-Dischargc Compliance/Enforcement Unit
,Wilmington Files 31-467
S:\WQS�ANIMALS\DUPLIN\2003\31-467novrfc2

0� \N A ris�a
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Lewis, Environmental Specialist III
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
FROM: Stonewall Mathis, Environmental Engineer 1
Wilmington Regional Office
THROUGH: Rick Shiver, Water Quality Regional Supmisor
Wilmington Regional Office
SUBJECT: Enforcement Report
Craig King
K-4 & K-5
Facility Number: 31467
Duplin County
DATE: May 13, 2003
Attached please find the subject enforcement report that concludes that Craig King:
1) Violated North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 by discharging animal waste into the
waters of the State without a permit.
2) Violated Condition 11. 4 of Swine Waste General Permit AWG 100000 by causing
ponding of animal waste.
On April 4, 2003, animal waste ponding occurred and runoff from an application field of the K-4 & K-5
discharged into an unnamed tributary of Oakie Branch. Oakic Branch is class C Sw waters of the State
within the Cape Fear River basin.
It is recommended that appropriate civil penalties be assessed in accordance with North Carolina General
Statute 143-215-6A(a)(2), It is also recommended that all of the enforcement costs incurred in the
investigation be recovered in the amount of $586.76 pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.3(a)(9).
If you have any questions, please contact me at 910-395-3900.
ATTACHMENTS
R' . Wilmington Regional Office (Entire Packagg)_
S:\WQS\ANIMALS\DUPLrN\2003�31-467enf\31-467memo
N. C. Division of Water Quallty 127 Cardinal Drive Extension [phone]
Wilmington Regional offiGe Wilmington, NC 211405 [phone] Fax
Customer Service
1 800 523-7748
A M.
SA
06 rN A

El
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF DUPLIN
FILE NO. DV
IN THE MATTER OF
CRAIG KING
FINDINGS AND DECISION
FOR VIOLATIONS OF NORTH CAROLINA AND ASSESSMENT OF
GENERAL STATUTE 143-215.1 FOR CIVIL PENALTIES
MAKING AN OUTLET INTO WATERS
OFTHESTATE
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, J. Kent Wiggins,
Acting Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Unit of the Water Quality Section of the Division of Water
Quality, make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Craig King owns and operates the K-4 & K-5, a swine animal operation along
Highway I I in Duplin County.
B. Craig'King was issued Certificate of Coverage AWS310467 under Swine Waste
General Permit AWG 100000 i ssut-.d pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 143 -
215.1 on October 1, 1998, effective on October 1, 1998, with an expiration date of
Apri 1 3 0, 2003 for the operation of an a nimal waste c o I lection, treatment, storage
and application system.
C. Condition 11. 4 of Swine Waste General Permit AWG 100000 states "Land
application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the Plant Available Nitrogen rate for the receiving crop or
result in runoff during any given application." The CAWMP states that no ponding
of waste should occur.
D. On April 4, 2003, animal waste ponding occurred on an application field of the K-4
& K-5. Animal waste runoff from the application field of the K-4 & K-5 discharged
into an unnamed tributary of Oakie Branch. Oakie Branch is class C Sw waters of
the State within the Cape Fear River basin.
E. Craig King bad no valid permit for the above described activities.
F. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $586.76.

v
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
11. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Craig King is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to G.S.
143-212(4).
B. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by G.S. 143-215. 1.
C. Craig King violated Condition 11. 4 of Swine Waste General Permit AWG100000 by
causing ponding of animal waste.
D. The unnamed tributary to Oakie Branch and Oakie Branch are waters of the State
within the meaning of G. S. 143 -215. 1 (a)(1) pursuant to G. S. 143 -212(6).
E. The above -cited discharge constitutes making an outlet into waters of the State for
purposes of G. S. 143 -215. 1 (a)(1 ), for whi ch a permit is required by G. S. 143 -215 l.
F. Craig King may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S. 143:
215.6A(a)(2) that provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand
dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who is required
but fails to apply for or to secure a pen -nit required by G.S. 143-215.1, or who
violates or fails to act in accordance with- the terms, conditions, or requirements of
such permit.
G. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Craig King
pursuant to G. S. 143 -215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 14313-282.1 (b)(8).
H. The Acting Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Unit of the Water Quality Section,
Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division
of Water Quality, has the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.

Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
111. DECISION:
Craig King is hereby assessed a civil penalty of -
for of one violation of G.S. 143-215,1 for discharging
animal waste into the waters of the State without a permit.
I
fo r of one violation of Condition 11. 4 of Swine Waste
General Permit AWG 100000 by causing ponding of animal
waste.
$ TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is percent of the
maximum penalty authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A.
586.76 Enforcement costs
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
consi dered the factors li sted in G. S. 14313-2 82.1 (b), which are-,
(1) The degree and extent of harrn to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on aii,quality;
The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date) J. Kent Wiggins
Acting Supervisor
Non -Discharge Unit
Water Quality Section
Division of Water Quality

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ANIMAL OPERATIONS
ENFORCEMENT CASE REPORT
Violator: Craig King
Contact Person: Craig King
Address: 126 Garland King Road, Teachey, NC 28464
Facility Name: K-4 & K-5
Facility #: 31-467
Receiving Stream and Classification: Unnamed tributary to Oakie Branch, C Sw, Cape Fear
River Basin
Regional Office: Wilmington
Inspector / Report Prepared By: Stonewall Mathis
Registered Agent: (if applicable)
Address: (if applicable)
Case Narrative: On April 4, 2003, animal waste ponding occurred, and animal waste runoff
from an application field of the K-4 & K-5 facility discharged into an unnamed tributary of Oakie
Branch, Oakie Branch is class C Sw waters of the State within the Cape Fear River basin.
Farm and/or Compan-y Compliance HistoEy: Include a copy of CAFO Desigation letters,
previous NOV=s, NOD=s, previous civil assessments, etc.
Mr. King owns facility # 71-56 that was assessed a penalty of $7,965.95 on June 29,-2000 for a
discharge to waters of the State that was discovered on 2/16/2000,
Mr. King owns facility 4 71-54 that was assessed a civil penalty of $4,822.80 on 4/23/1996-
Also, at the K-4 & K-5, Mr. King has been issued a Notice of Violation on April 29, 1997 for
waste in ditches.
Amount of Waste Discharge (if applicable). If amount cannot be estimated, whal is the rate
of flow reachiniz surface water.
The waste discharge to surface waters is estimated at 450 gallons. This was determined from an
estimate of the discharge into surface waters of at a rate of 5 gallons per minute for a period of 90
minutes.
Sample Results (If aw2licable) with locations of sarnl2les taken noted in relation
discharee point:
Sample point "Field" is a sample of the ponded waste in the application field. Sample point
"Up" is in the unnamed tributary (UT) to Oakie Branch just a few feet upstream of the point that
animal waste runoff from tile application field discharged into the UT. Sample point "Down" is
in the unnamed tributary (UT) to Oaki e Branch just a few feet downstream of the point that
aniffial waste runoff from the application field discharged into the UT. Sample point "Hwy I I
is in the UT to Oakie Branch about 250 feet downstream of the point that animal waste runoff
from the application field discharged into the UT. The sample results are shown below,

Sample Point
- Field
Up
Down
HEY I I
Fecal Coliform,
1,600,000 est.
118
41,000
>6,000
colonies/100mL
NO2+NO3 - N,
0.25
0.14
<0.025
0.12
mg/L
NH3-N, mg/L
42
0.6
10.5
12
TKN, mg/L
375
1.4
13.4
15.7
Total Phosphorus,
16.9
0.06
1.31
0.93
mg/L
Violator's degree of cooveration (including efforts to prevent or restore) recalcitrance:
Mr. King failed to ensure proper waste application and this failure resulted in ponding of animal
waste, runoff of animal waste, and discharge of animal waste into waters of the State. Mr..King
did use a machine and some fill dirt to create a dam to prevent waste ftorn continuing to runoff of
the field.
Fish kill observed? Y/N If -yes, include report from WRC:
A fish kill was not observed at the time of the inspection.
Mitigating Circumstances.,
There are no mitigating circumstances.
Recornmendationt
The Wilmington Regional Office is recommending assessment of civil penalties to the Director
of the Division of Water Quality pursuant to G-S - 143-215-6A.
Include a copy of the previously completed Animal Operations Inspection Form, pictures and
site sketch of wasteflow if waste is dischargcd to surface waters. Also include violator's
response to Notice ofRecommendationfor Enforcement. If citing certifiedplan orpermil
condition violations, include copies ofpermit orplan.
Assessmen t Factors rea u i red to be con sidered b-y G.S. 14313-282.1 (b):
1. The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation:
The animal waste discharge caused elevated fecal coliform levels as well as elevated
nutrient levels in the unnamed tributary to Oakie Branch. These pollutants are harmful to
the ecology and use of the waters.
2. The duration and gravity of the violation:
The duration of the runoff of waste into the waters of the State is thought to have
occurred for a period of about 90 minutes. The gravity of the violation is that a total of
450 gallons is thought to have discharged to surface waters.

3. The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality:
The effect on surface water quality is documented in the provided sample results above.
The effect on ground water and air quality is thought to be minimal.
4. The cost of rectifying the damage:
The damage that was done by the animal waste to the waters of the State cannot be
rectified. Mr. King did use a machine and some fill dirt to create a dam to prevent waste
from continuing to runoff of the field-, the cost of this activity is thought to be minimal.
5. The amount of money saved by noncompliance:
This is not known for this case.
6. Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally:
The writer does not think that the violation was committed willfully or intentionally, but
the proper application of waste was not ensured resulting in the discharge to waters of the
State.
7. The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority:
Please see the comments above under Farrn and/or Company Compliance HistoKy-
8. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures:
The State's enforcement costs totaled $, as follows:
Staff, Mathis,. 3 hours @ $23.28/hour $ 69.84
Pictures 24 @ $0.16 each $ 3.84
Mileage, 12/4/02 68 @ $0.31/mile $ 21.08
Samples, Fecal Coliform.
4 @ $30/cach $ 120.00
Nutrients
4 @ $68/each $272.00
Administrative Costs $100.00
Total $586.76
S:\WQS�ANIMALSOUPLIN\2003\31-467enf\31-467enfreport

I
<S>
N
rcj]
.9 A�-
N C�
4p
l7i 4
K I.-"
Yzi
4> C
r7l
m
!z I

V1
re, jq
D C(i�4
r
47
NoT -To
V
Radio Tower! I
o
0" f'L_
7::_
FIT, L/P a
It
It fT.Pe'Lot-IM" 5.4m& rir. .10
A
_.t� P ............ . .
i 22,S .90
ell
ji
-Dale
V6
Ir
'g
46
Al"
6,
R
jj� a
k,
41
I Dempwy
2 310 OW FEET 229 57'3(r
30 eWAUACE EASyj
published by the Geological Survey 5453 Of NW 132
)AA. and North Carolina Geodetic Survey SCALE 1:24 000
metric mithods f rorn aerial photographs W%
pill ;;;!!f:::j!d1
:ed 1979. Map edited 1981 �__rju]11101! 111:1!��
f
3t grid ticks: North Carolina coordinate GN a AffEk� 2
ti conic) - 6%' MILES
nsverse Mercator grid. zone 18 -116 -W-I—LS P41' IDM 0 110100 20DO 3M
UM 30 MILS 70M MW
%--m SDI_
FEff
CONTOUR INTERVAL 2 METERS
r­Anv-rw "Fit-13CAL DATUM OF 1929

Yl
'14
M
e.
!jr 3
it
V16
1.0
'L7
jp
Aw 4
71, m ':
It
tt
_.r_. Lul
;ie ft l
.4 N'T
7.,
jWY
A h f 0'
Uj
T" 0
Tv
I

.. .... . ... . - .. , 't' - , -J, -- )., r.- - ,
J F, r
f,
on'
q 'y -p
L4
,ot
'tt
'. L , " L - Ir
WOM
. 4
1 -4
5T
71,
w4 f
-fo
IF
p 4' t'
V- 4
4 1 --NAU-
1- 4
All. '4 4

Facility Sum her Dak dif Visit- Time:
IONotOncratin k-00elow—Threshold!3
13Permitted OCertified 13Conditionally Certified [311egistered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
d/ � 4q- - j
m3 K- JD Ulf
Farm Name: Countv:
Owner Name* e,
_ PhOoU NO:
Mailing Address,,
Facility Contact: Title- Phone No;
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator. Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm;
.4
0 Swine 0 Poultry Cattle 0 Horse LaWnde Longitude
Des g�
urre D -I
I -r .'.. - es gn U�iinfI
-es.gn--,
�P
SWjj -�n 16" -p- M..%�". C bact ". POP6 at
�Cftpac u ii on t C a
Wear 'OF
wean to Feeder
F"
L.
a er Dairy
tto I
El Feeder to
E01
ED None-rL]n
ED] Non-L ver j Non -Dairy I
Faffow to Wean
rr('.,j, 0
y
pfeeder
rrow
E E] t
I Farrow to Feeder
LU 6-th c Ir
t
Farrow 0
El Farrow to Finish
T Jital Didgn',Ca
El Gilts
T 't'
0
Boars
71
�;�Niimber of Lag6ons Spray Field Area
;�y4rz,�"4; [E] Su bsu rface Drains present Lagoon A rea
§�Iid Trap No Liquid Waste Management System
'eyes 0 No
Djtschqr,.,r.,s _& SlEgam I-nipacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated ot: 0 Lagoon Ospray Field El Other
a. If discharge is nbsmed, was the conveyance nian-made?
b. II'discharge is observed, did it rcach Water of the Slate? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. Ifilischarge is obsened. what is the estimated flow in gaymin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yn, notify D\VQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Wcre there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to [lie Waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
%V11st coillectioll & 1=0"Cint
4. Is storage capacity (fireeboard plus slorra storage) less than adequate? El Spillwav
Structure I StruciUTC 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Siructure 5
ldcnlifier� /<' f;7
Freehoard (inches)
0.510311)1
[I Yes El No
J2 Yes El No
L� S
0 Yes El No
El Yes El No
El Yes El No
D Yes El No
Stmctun� 6
Continued
Djtschqr,.,r.,s _& SlEgam I-nipacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated ot: 0 Lagoon Ospray Field El Other
a. If discharge is nbsmed, was the conveyance nian-made?
b. II'discharge is observed, did it rcach Water of the Slate? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. Ifilischarge is obsened. what is the estimated flow in gaymin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yn, notify D\VQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Wcre there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to [lie Waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
%V11st coillectioll & 1=0"Cint
4. Is storage capacity (fireeboard plus slorra storage) less than adequate? El Spillwav
Structure I StruciUTC 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Siructure 5
ldcnlifier� /<' f;7
Freehoard (inches)
0.510311)1
[I Yes El No
J2 Yes El No
L� S
0 Yes El No
El Yes El No
El Yes El No
D Yes El No
Stmctun� 6
Continued

, ifscilitv'Number-31 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion.
Yes
No
seepage. etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site Which are not proper]), addressed andlor managed through a waste management Or
closure plan?
Yes
No
(If anv of questions 4-6 Was answered ves. and the situation poses an
immediate public health or en-vironme'rital threat, notify D"'Q)
7. Do any of the structures need rnaintenance/improvement?
El Yes
[I No
8. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
Yes
0 No
9. Do any stuctutes lack adequate. gauged markers With required maximum and minimum liquid level
ele%ration markings?
D Yes
ONo
NKASt e ADDI'Mik ti 0 n
10. Are th c re any bu ffers th at n c ed m a i h i cn anc e!i mprov ern en t?
Yes
C No
11. Is there evidence of over application? )2rExcessivc Ponding E3PAN _12"Hydraulic Overload
zles
[:3 No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAAMP)?
I
[D Yes
E No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
E3 Yes
El No
b) Dots the facilin, need a wettabic acre determination?
E3 Yes
0 No
c.) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
ED Yes
0 No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'
[I Yes
El No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
0 Yes
ONo
R-elmired Becords & 12ocuments
17. Fail to ha ve Ccrti ficat e o f Cc vera ee & Gcn era] P eTm i i or other Perm it re a di I y avai lab I e?
Yes
I--] No
18. Does the facil i ry fail to h ave all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Pian readily available?
Oc/ WUP, checklists, design. maps. etc.)
El Yes
El No
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ic! irrigation, freeboard, wast-,:inalysis & soil sampIti-cports)
Yes
No
20. Is facility'not in compliance with any' applicablt setback criteTia in effect at the time of design?
Yes
No
21. Did the facilitv fail to have a actively cenified operator it, charge?
0 Yes
El No
22. Fail to notif-v regional DNVQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
[I Yes
El No
(iti'discharge. ftccboard problMs. LWCT application)
23� Did Rn,iewer,'InspectoT fail to discuss revic'w.-Inspection with on -site representative?
Dyes
;2�rNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Ej Yes
No
25. 'Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A)XW?
Ej Yes
No
No- Vio I a ti o n s o r de A cie n cies we re n oted d urin g th Is -vi s it. Y o u will receive n o in rt her c o rrespon d en te ab ou t thi s vislit.
.T
iii ftfiy,VES si&wen and/Grany.recommendadons or -any comm MT,
er en
Uie drawin6'of facility to better explain situations." (6seadaia6isipages &'s'necessarv): _-V�
E) field corw E03 Final
t'V e,
r V r 41-Al �'r C
's
4e, -r &'4 '0 I
b 450 �p
,^qmll
fv
Reviewer/Inspector Name 111�t io -V
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Condnued

rl
IN
IN
rl
lz
Ih
I
I
0

Picture Captions for the April 4, 2003 discharge at the K-4 & K-5 facility # 31-467 belonging to
Craig King.
1) The K-5 facility with the land application field shown,
2) Animal waste being land applied to the application field at the K-4 & K-5 facility. The
unnamed tributary (UT) to Oakie Branch that animal waste discharged into is to the left
of the photo.
3) Animal waste being land applied to the application field at the K-4 & K-5 facility. The
UT to Oakic Branch that animal waste discharged into is to the left of the photo.
4) Animal waste being land applied to the application field at the K4 & K-5 facility. The
UT to Oakie Branch that animal waste discharged into is to the left of the photo. Mr.
Craig King is in the vehicle on the application field.
5) Animal waste being land applied to the application field at the K4 & K-5 facility,
6) Animal waste being land applied to the application field at the K-4 & K-5 facility with
ponded animal waste shown in the foreground of the photo.
7) Ponded animal waste in the application field.
8) Pondcd animal waste in the application field.
9) Ponded animal waste in the application field. This is sample point "Field".
10) Ppeided animal waste near the edge of the field is shown in the foreground. The an--,Tfial
waste is running out of the application area and is discharging into the UT to Oakie
.Branch located behind the photographer. Mr. King is in the piece of machinery ilh the
bac�ground of the photo; Mr. King is bringing a load of fill dirt to create a dam,to',
prevent further runoff of waste.
11) Ponded animal waste near the edge of the field is shown near the foreground of the photo.
Animal waste is running off of the field and discharging into the UT at the hedge line in
the background of the photo.
12) Animal waste runoff from the field is discharging into the UT seen beyond the fencing.
13) Animal waste runoff from the field is discharging into the UT seen beyond the fencing.
14) Animal waste is shown discharging into the UT to Oakie Branch. The direction of flow
in the UT is to the right of the photo. The K-5 facility and land application field is seen
in the background of the photo behind the hedgerow.
15) Animal waste is shown discharging into the UT to Dakie Branch. The direction of flow
in the UT is to the right of the photo.
16) Animal waste is shown discharging into the UT to Oakie Branch. The direction of flow
in the UT is to the right of the photo.

17) Animal waste is shown discharging into the UT to Oakie Branch.
18) Animal waste is shown discharging into the UT to Oakie Branch.
19) Animal waste is shown discharging into the UT to Oakie Branch, Sample point "Up" is
seen near the middle foreground of the photograph.
20) Sample point "Up" in the UT to Oakie Branch.
21) Sample point "Down" in the UT to Oakie Branch.
22) Sample point "Hwy I I" in the UT to Oakie Branch.
23) Highway I I near sample point "Hwy I I".
24) Mr. King is seen gathering some fill dirt to create a dam to prevent further runoff of
animal waste from the field,

m
jjz
QL
0
ci
, q-6
T,
-17 AMZ! -7
T
f
'j.3
_tli .
A r
.
'a , " , . . I ill _. - . ,
- -
o
k .
Fo
It
W
ki
1 16
I
4 f--

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I
;� L

i.j
Ppppp
Al
1, cq�
,I ILv
It 4y, lr
At 1L.
- - - - - - - - - - - ..... . . . . . .
q jjy,�­�1,1,1 10M�17121!!!::!!��
J,
;Zv�t� !,
A
46�
oil
'w k
IN k
41
4
k
%,
L
k
Ai ;�;4
! +aAl
43
I �n
s I i Ile
10 "I
4

Vc
lo
J At.
k
k
k
I rINgo
k Y.
.1 V) k
k r I
'k
r,,, I
4'
k
kt
4
k
JL
07
t9
M i
Al. p 1.�
:4
4
4�
j 4r
k
4�4
014
1- 4

4F,
VN� x-x
,4. '1-
Al
or
0 ,

O!j
Jtt
M P
ov
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
It.
-7 4N
a 2
%4L
40
4t
FF
jMPP
P' qt�4
—1410, tr
m Ym� .

*Abd
xr r
�,j a
I, X­1'
K1,
Ovi
IV
146 y
re

vt
v Ao ro
lk ,
5,0, 12
pA
.0c -
t-.,Llwl - - !LC:T ---, - - .
lip,
41
k1l
A
7 't Ali
om,,-O. "-A., . - - r_� 11,
'A
k Ilk

�k,
P5-Mv
1W.
A'a",
f* 4'
14
1^4
-41
�MA
IN 7T
ilk
Pr
lei

sk�
00
p
'At
07
4,4
316
IL 4q,
'if
I A
-NA
ir
��t M-0
7pp
4�:--
!4 4,­
......... . .. . . . . . . . .

-Abe
1 .
4n
-iR
IVIR
dk 41i.a q J,
4te.
66
1. 16
ly,
.41
X-a
4 N

U i
14,
ol
gt.
A

ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING
CHEMISTS
Customer:
NCDENR-DWQ
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Attn: Stonewall Mathis
Date Sampled:
Sampled By:
WAqTF.WATVR!
04/04/03
Stonewall Mathis
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
.'.16602 Windmill Wiy I Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
[phone] (Lab) - [phone] (Fax)
[e-mail]
NCDENR: DWQ CERTIFICATE #94, DLS CERTIFICATE #37729
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Date of Report: April 14, 2003
Purchase Order #:
Report Number: 3-1888
Report To: Stonewall Mathis
Project:
PARAMETER
Sample ID
Up
Field
Down
Hwy 11
Lab ID
# 4485
4486
04487
04488
Nitrate + Nitrite Nitrogen, NO3+NOrN mg/L
0,14
0.25
< 0.025
0.12
Ammonia, NH3-N mg/L
0.6
42
10.5
12
Total Phosphorus, P mg/L
0.06
16.9
1.31
0.93
Total KJeldahl Nitrogen, TKN mg/L
1.4
375
13.4
15.7
[!!.—HlC oliform, colonies/100 mL
118
-
1,600,000 est.
I ,
41,000
I
> 6000
Comments:
Reviewed by(

rochem
le n7N r7i r7( � m
Analytical & CGnsulting Chemists
NC,DCo,-J6Z --JDWG?
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC
Sample Collection and Chain of Custod
NCDENR: DWQ Certifkate #94, DLS Cmiffiexle #37729
Collected By: --4 o yie Wc� /I- ryj'-*.-4
-hL -- -
19arnnip Tvnet I = Influent- F. = F.MmPuL W =WPll/r9TN=
7 Rtream. 1.90=1.RniL ;eul
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: EghemWQW.S-om
Report No:
Sample Identification
Collection
A
E.
8 5'
i
065
U
dt
PRESERVATION
ANALYSIS REOt=ED
z
U
w
--08.
DATI
TIME
TEM-P
q52
C
e- r
C
I'le
u
(Q
-G
le)05
C
F-C
-7-T
--4g�
G
V
W-3
I
-G
e
-T--T
L-V
-CT
C
0 L'a
ic
q41
Ice
/V 1, 4 Y-
G
q 3 /P
C
n,
G
T
C
IUL-111�i--nqJ
G
rNOETICC'-
C
P
G
G
C
P
-G
G
Dr CHLORINATION : Sam pies for Ammon ia, TKN, Cya nide, Phenol, and Bacteria must be dechlori n ated
ppm or less) in the field at the time of collection. See reverse side for instructions.
t(O.2
m
Transfer
Relinquished By:
Date/Time
Received By:
Date/Time
2.
X
Temperature whgn Received: 1. 3 'r, Accepted: . Reje0ed: Resample Requested:
livered BY: Received By: el � of
0 e- Date.- j�z���3-Time:
,%euts:

Zr
\N A -r,,z-
U1
-7
7-
>
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
April 10, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7002 2410 0006 9367 9440
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Craig King
126 Garland King Road
Teachey, NC 28464
Subject: Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement
King Fan-ns K-4 & K-5
Facility Number: 31-467
Duplin County
Dear Mr. King:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Qual'ity
Th is is to noti fy you o f a vio lation of North Carolina General Statute 143 -215, 1.
On April,4, 2003, animal waste runoff from an application field of the referenced facility discharged into
an unnamed tributary of Oakie Branch. Oakie Branch is class C Sw waters of the State within the Cape
Fear River basin. This i ' s a violation of N.C.G.S. 143-215.1 that requires that no person shall make an
outlet into the waters of the State without having obtained and abided by the appropriate permit.
In response to this -violation, a detailed Plan of Action must be submitted to this office. This Plan of
Action must include the following:
a, The violation and the cause of the violation.
b. A description of the actions taken to stoP and correct the violation.
C. A description of the actions taken and proposed to be taken to prevent the recurrence of
the violation.
d. A I ist show ing the dates for the accom pl i shme nt of th ese actions.
This office must receive the proposed written Plan of Action within fifteen days of your receipt of this
notice.
You may wish to contact your County Soil & Water Conservation District Office, County Extension
office, a qual ified. technical specialist, and/or a professional engineer for any assistance they may be able
to provide.
N. C. Division of Water QuaJity 127 Cardinal Drive Extension [phone]
Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington, NC 28405 [phone] Fax
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

Craig King
King Farms K-4 & K-5
April 10, 2003
Page Two
Be advised that this office is considering recommending assessment of civil penalties to the Director of
the Division of Water Quality for the above noted violation. This violation may result in civil penalties of
up to $25,000 in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A(a)(2), You may also be
assessed for reasonable costs of the investigation in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.3(a)(9). If you have an explanation for this violation that you wish to present, please submit your
written response along with the Plan ofAction. Your response will be forwarded to the Director along
with the enforcement package for his consideration.
Be advised that the Division of Water Quality may take further action in this matter including assessment
of civil penalties, injunctive relief, and permit revocation.
If you have any questions cone emin g this matter, pl ease do not hesitate to call Mr. Stonewall Mathi s at
910-395-3900 ext, 203 or Mr. Steve Lewis at 919-733-5083 ext. 539.
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Patrick Fussell, DSWC-WiRO
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown, LLC
DWQ Central Files
DWQ Non -Discharge Compliance�Enfbrcement Unit
Wilmington Files 31-467
S-.\WQS\ANIA4ALS\DUPLIN\2003\31-467novrfe

I complete it 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 L�X_821
ricted Delivery is desired.
I Prin� your narre and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
I Attach this card to the back of the mailipiece,
or on the front it space permits.
Arlice Addressed W
C. VN
C_C7 C
Cj
C' . �. "� � All � -1 �. �j I �
A.
13. R vO,4 (P red Name)
Michael F. Easley, Governor
0 Agent
0 Addressee Wifliann G. Ross Jr., Secretary
�ironment and Natural Resources
0, Date of Delivery i
0. Is deliveryaddres� different frorn item 1? 13yes
if YES, enter delivery address below: M No
3. ServiceType
J<Certified Mail 0 Express Mail
0 Registered 11 Return Receipt fGr Merchandise
0 Insured Mail 0 C.0-1).
41 Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) E] Yes
Arficle Number
(Tans for from service label) 7002 2410 0006 9367 9440
S Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return F1'�COIPt 102595-02-M-1540
A _VS-.T -1 1 Uj J ILP�j . -F I
Duplin County
Dear Mr. King:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Th is is to notify you of a violation of North Carol i na General S tatute 143 -215. 1.
On April 4, 2003, animal waste runciff from an application field of the referenced facility discharged into
an unnamed tributary of Clakie Branch. Oakie Branch is class C Sw waters of the State within the Cape
Fear River basin. This is a violation of N.C.G.S. 143-215.1 that reqoires that no person shall make an
outlet into the waters'of the State without having obtained and abided by the appropriate permit.
In response to this -violation, a detailed Plan of Action must be submitted to this office. This Plan of,
Action must include the following.
a. The violation and the cause of the violation,
b. A description of the actions taken to stop and correct the violation.
C. A description of the actions taken and proposed to be taken to prevent the recurrence of
the violation.
d. A list showing the dates for the accomplishment of these actions.
This office inust receive the proposed written Plan of Action within fifteen days of your receipt of this
notice.
You may wish to contact your County Soil & Water Conservation District Office, County Extension
offi ce, a q ual ified tech n ical speci al i st, and/or a professional engineer for any assistance they may be ab I e
to provide.
XT.
A-;h
N, C. Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension [phone] Customer Service
Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington, NC 28405 [phone] Fax [phone] RZ DERR

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment 7" 7�"� "N_ -,=-7
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 1, 1998
Craig King
King Farms K-4 & K-5
126 Garland K�ng Rd
Teachey NC 28464
3W
NCDENR
NORTH r-AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONME14T ANC) NArURAL. Resouncrm
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310467
King Farms K-4 & K-5
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin Cotifity
Dear Craig King:
In accordance with your application received on July 29, 1998, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) issued to Craig King, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the King Farms K-4 & K-5, located in Duplin County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 580 Farrow to Feeder and 1280 Feeder to Finish,
and the application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWW).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAVIMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAV84P and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CA WMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
Xhis COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
Art Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS310467
King Farms K-4 & K-5
Page 2
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within M
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Wilmington Regional 0
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need addii
COC or the General Permit, please contact JR Joshi at [phone]
Sincere
-�A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccps)
Duptin County Health Department
Wilmington Resicinal Office, Water Quality Section
Duplin County Sol and Water Conservation District
Permit File
IV

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONIMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
SWINE WASTE OPERATION GENERAL PERMIT
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Holders of
Certificates of Coverage (COC) under this permit shall comply with the following specified conditions
and limitations:
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
1. The animal waste collection, treatment, storage and application system perr:n1tted under
this permit shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to
prevent the discharge of pollutants to surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. Application of
waste at agronomic rates to terraces and grassed waterways is acceptable in accordance
with Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Standards. Facilities which are in
compliance with their CAWMP and this permit, which unintentionally discharge as a
result of a storm event greater than the 25-year, 24-hour storm, will not be considered to
be in violation of this pernfit.
2. The CAWMP is hereby incorporated by reference into this general pern-lit. New or
expanding farms are required to be certified prior to the stocking of animals, The
CAWMP must be consistent with all applicable statutes, rules and standards in effect at
the time ' of siting, design and certification of the facility. Any violation of the CAWNP
shall be considered a violation of this general permit and subject to enforcement actions.
A violation of the General Permit may result in the Permittee having to take immediate or
long term corrective action(s) as required by the Division of Water Quality. These
actions may include modifying the CAWMP, ceasing land application of waste, or
removing animals from the farm.
3. The facility may not be expanded above the capacity shown in the COC until a new COC
reflecting the expansion has been issued.
4. A copy of this General Permit, COC, certification forms, lessee and landowner
agreements, and the CAV*IMP shall be readily pailable at the farm (stored at places such
as the farm residence, office, outbuildifigs, etc.) where animal waste management
activities are being conducted for the life of this permit. These documents shall be kept
in good condition and records shall be maintained in an orderly fashion.
5. For all new and expanding operations, no collection or 'storage facilities may be
constructed in a I 00-year flood plain.

4.k
11.
6. Existing swine dry lots may remain in wetlands as long as the wetlands uses are not
removed or degraded as a result of the swine. The swine however may not be confined
within 100 feet of an adjacent stream or a season all y-flooded area, The swine also must
not cause a loss of more than 1017c of the existing tree canopy. Where trees do not exist,
the area must be managed to include crop rotation.
QEERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
The collection, treatment, and storage facilities, and land application equipment and fields
shall be maintained at all times and properly operated.
2. A vegetative cover shall be maintained on all land application fields and buffers in
accordance with the CAWMP. No waste may be applied upon fields not included in the
CAWMP.
3. Lime must be applied, as needed, to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop
production.
4. Land application rates shall be'in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the Plant Available Nitrogen rate for the receiving crop or result
in runoff during any given application. I
5. Application of animal waste onto land which is used to grow crops for direct human
consumption (e.g., strawberries, melons, lettuce, cabbage, apples, etc.) shall not occur
following the planting of the crop or at any time during the growing season, or in the case
of fruit bearing trees, following breaking dormancy. Application of animal wastes shall
not occur within 30 days of the harvesting of fiber and food crops for direct human
consumption that undergo further processing.
6. If manure or sludges are applied on conventionally tilled bare soil, the waste shall be
incorporated into the soil within two (2) days after application on the land. This
requirement does not apply to no -Lill fields, pasture, or fields where crops are actively
growine
CP*
7. Domestic and/or industrial wastewater from showers, toilets, sinks, etc. shall not be
discharged into the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and application system.
Washdown of stock trailers, owned by and used to transport animals to and from this
farm only, will be permissible as long as the system can accommodate the additional
volume. Only those detergents and disinfectants that arc labeled by the manufacturer as
readily biodegradable may be utilized.
S. Disposal of dead animals shall be done in accordance with the North Carolina
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDACS) Veterinary Division's
regulations.
2

9. Unless accounted for in temporary storage volume, all uncontam�inated runoff from the
surrounding property and buildings shall be diverted away from the animal waste lagoons
and storage ponds to prevent any unnecessary addition to the liquid volume in the
structures.
10. A protective vegetative cover shall be established and maintained on all lagoon/storage
pond embankments (outside toe of embankment to maximum pumping elevation), berms,
pipe runs, and surface water diversions. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall
not be allowed to grow on the lagoon/waste storage pond embankments. All trees shall
be removed in accordance with good engineering practices. Lagoon/waste storage pond
areas shall be accessible, and vegetation shall be kept mowed.
11. At the time of sludge removal from a lagoon, the sludge must be managed in accordance
with a CAWMP. When removal of sludge from the lagoon is necessary, provisions must
be taken to prevent damage to lagoon dikeg and liners.
12. Lagoons/storage ponds shall be kept free of foreign debris including, but not limited to,
tires, bottles, light bulbs, gloves, syringes or any other solid waste.
13, The facility'must have one of the following iternsat all times (a) adequate animal waste
application and handling equipment, (b) a lease, or other written agreement, for the use of
the necessary equipment, (c) a contract with a third party applicator capable of providing
adequate waste application, or (d) a contract for the purchase of the equipment.
Equipment shall be capable of meeting perm.it condition R (4).
III. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
An inspection of the waste collection, treatment, and storage structures and runoff control
measures shall be conducted at a frequency to insure proper operation but at least
monthly and after storm events. For example, lagoons, storage ponds, and other
structures should be inspected for evidence of erosion, leakage, damage by animals or
discharge. Any major structural repairs (to lagoons or waste storage ponds) must havc
wfitten documentation from a technical specialist certifying proper design and
installation. However, if a piece of equipment is being replaced with a piece of
equipment of the identical specifications ' ' no technical specialist approval is necessary
(i.e. piping, reels, valves, pumps (if the GRML capacity is not being increased or
decreased), etc.3.
3

2. if not already installed at this facility, a waste -level gauge to monitor waste levels shall be
installed within 60 days of issuance of the COC under this general permit. This gauge
shall have readily visible permanent markings indicating the maximum liquid level at the
top of the temporary liquid storage volume, n-Linimurn liquid level at the bottom of the
temporary liquid storage volume, top of the dam elevations. Where storage ponds are
utilized, only a gauge indicating the maximum liquid level at the top of the temporary
liquid storage volume and top of dam elevations need be. installed. Caution must be taken
not to damage the integrity of the liner when installing the gauge. Waste lagoon and
storage pond levels shall be recorded weekly on forms supplied or approved by the
DWQ For level gauges already installed, the gauge shall have at a nlinimum: readily
visible permanent markings indicating the maximum liquid level at the top of the
temporary liquid storage volume and minimum liquid level at the bottom of the
temporary liquid storage volume.
3. A representative Standard Soil fertility Analysis, including pH, copper, and zinc, shall be
conducted annually on each application field receiving animal waste. The results of these
tests shall be maintained on file by the Permittee for a minimum of three years and shall
be made available to the DWQ upon request.
4. An analysis of the animal waste shall be conducted as close to the time of application as
practical and at least with.in 60 days (before or after) of the date of application, This
analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen Zinc
Phosphorous Copper
Records, including land application event(s) and removal of solids to an off -site
location(s) records, shall be maintained by the Permittee in chron6logical and legible
form for a minimum of three years. These records shall be maintained on forms provided
or approved by the DWQ and shall be readily available for inspection.
6. Regional Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Regional Office as soon as
possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the occurrence
of any of the following events:
a. Failure of any component of the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system resulting in a discharge to surface waters.
b. Any failure of the animal waste treatment and disposal system that renders the facility
incapable of adequately receiving, treating or storing the'animal waste and/or sludge.
c. A spill or discharge from a vehicle transporting animal waste or sludge to the land
application field which results in, a discharge to surface waters or an event that poses
a serious threat to surface waters.
d. Any deterioration or leak in a lagoon/storage pond that poses an immediate threat to
the environment.
4

4--1*74R; 1� W27 1 7 1 -
e. Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage greater than or equal to that
required in Condition V (3) of this General Permit.
f. Overapplying animal waste either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or
where runoff enters surface waters.
g. Any discharge that bypasses a lagoon/storage pond resulting in a discharge to surface
waters or that poses a serious threat to the environment.
For any emergency which requires immediate reporting after normal business
hours, please contact the Division of Emergency Management at 1.800-859-0368.
The Perrn�ittee shall also file a written report to the appropriate DWQ Regional Office of
the occurrence within 5 calendar days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This
report shall outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to correct the problem and to
ensure that the problem does not recur. The requirement to file a written report may not
be waived by the DWQ Regional Office.
IV. INSPECTIONS
Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the DWQ may, upon
pre5entation of credentials and in accordance with reasonable and appropriate biosecurity
measures, enter and inspect any property, pren-dses or place on or related to the collection,
treatment, Storage and land application system at any reasonable time for the purpose of
deter -mining compliance with this perm�it; may inspect and obtain a copy of any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit; and may obtain'samples
of the animal waste, groundwater, soil, plant tissue, or surface water.
V. GENEK41L CONDITIONS
1. The issuance of a COC under this pem-�t shall not relieve the Permittee of the
responsibility for damages to surface waters or ground waters resulting from the animal
operation.
2. The Pertnittee shall designate a certified animal waste management system operator to be
in charge (OIC) of the animal waste management system. The animal waste management
system shall be operated by the OTC or a person under the OTC's supervision.
3. The maximum waste level in ]agoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the
CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds must not
exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain the 25-year, 24-hour storm
event plus an additional I foot of structural freeboard. In addition to the above
requirements, for new and expanding farms with lagoon designs completed after
September 1, 1996,.storage must also be provided for the heavy rainfall factor for lagoons
without an outside drainace area.
a
In the case of lagoons/storage ponds in series that are gravity fed, the 25-year, 24-hour
storm event and/or the heavy rainfall factor storage rcquirements for the system may be
designed into the lowest lagoon/storage pond in the system. However, adequate
freeboard must be designed into each of the upper lagoons/storage ponds to allow
sufficient storage to prevent the waste level from raising into the structural freeboard
while the storm water is draining into the lowest lagoon in the system,
5

4. Should the DWQ have good reason to believe that any activities conducted pursuanr to''
this permit may cause or contribute any waste, directly or indirectly, to be intem-�xed
with the waters of the State, the DWQ may require any monitoring (including but not
limited to groundwater, surface water, animal waste, sludge, soil and plant tissue)
necessary to determine the source, quantity, quality, and effect of such waste upon the
waters of the State. Such monitoring, including its scope, frequency, duration and any
sampling, testing, and reporting systems, shall meet all applicable Environmental
Management Commission requirements. "Good Reason" may be based on the findings of
a related Feder4 State, Commission or DENR authorized study or report, or other
evidence showing that violations of State water quality standards or other applicable
environmental standards have occurred or may occur.
5. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit, the facility's
CAWMP and/or. any COC issued under this permit may subject the Permittee to an
enforcement action by the DWQ in accordance with North Carolina General Statutes and
may include the requirement to obtain an individual non -discharge permit andlor the
modification of the animal waste management system
6� The issuance of a COC under this permit does not excuse the Pern-dttee from the
obligation to comply with all applicable statutes, rules, regulations, orordinances (loc4
state, and federal).
7. If animal production ceases, the Perrriittee shall close the lagoons/storage ponds in
accordance with Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) lagoon/storage pond
closure standards or develop and implement an animal waste management plan in
accordance with NRCS standards. Closure shall also include notifying the DWQ and
submittal of the Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form to DWQ-
Water Quality Section- Non -Discharge Branch within 15 days of completion of closure.
S. The annual pem-iit fee shall be paid by the Permittee within thirty (30) days.after being
billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee accordingly constitutes grounds for
revocation of the COC granting coverage under this General Permit.
9. Failure of the Permittee to maintain, in full force and effect, lessee and landowner
agreements which are required in the CAWMP, shall constitute grounds for revocation of
the CPC granting coverage under this General Perrnit.
10. This permit allows for the distribution of manure up to 4 cubic yards per visit to
individuals for personal use.
R

R I MT,
11. The Groundwater Compliance Boundary for the disposal system constructed after
December 31, 1983, is established at either (1) 250 feet from the waste structures and
from the waste disposal area, or (2) 50 feet within the property boundary, whichever is
closest to the waste structures and the waste disposal area. If this facility was constructed
prior to December 31i 1983, the Compliance Boundary i's established at either (1) 500
feet from the waste disposal area, or (2) at the property boundary, whichever is closest to
the waste disposal area. An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond
the Compliance Boundary is subject to the requirements of 15A NCAC 2L and the
Division in addition to the penalty provisions applicable under the North Carolina
General Statutes.
This General Permit issued the eighteenth day of May, 1998.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
A. Pre st on Howard, Jr., P. ��ector
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Comrr�ssion
Swine Waste General Permit -Number AWG100000
7

MY
66UCER: Craig King 4&5
126 Garland King Rd.
-LOCATION:
Teachey,NC 28466
[phone]
TELEPHONE:
TYPE OPERATION: Existing Combination Swine Farm
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 1860
.(Design Capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is
to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all
plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown. .
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it
is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters which is not allowed under OEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a
growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting, Injecting the
waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission,
Page 1

�,�QNIPI�4L AN,
M,oi4,
VVJ
-7 2_hj�m H
2' 007 Jkr9RC:RI =
mmMC, ! I �� - �g
"M
em rlfi�
/.AA rMn Q'unt of Waste Producad PerY&ar gallona- ft, tons- etc,
1,860 animals X 3.583870968 (tons) waste/animal/year =
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
1,860 animals X 3,609677AI lbs. PAN/animaltyear
Guide Std. 633)
6,666 (tons) waste/year.
6,714 lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from N.C.
Tech
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Fileld* Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Tvioe Per Acre Utilized AnDlication
T3471
2
NoA
Bermuda(G)__
255
10.17
2593.35
March -_Sept,
T3511
3
NoA
Bermuda(G)
255
2.58
657,9
March - SeeL—
T3511
4
NoA
Bermuda(G)
255
1.81
461.55
March -Sept.
T351 1 &
3A
NoA
Small Grain(G)
50,
14,57
728.5
Sept. - April
T3471
I
NoA
Corn
130
13.34
1734.2
March -August
T3471
I
NoA
Soybeans
150
13.34
2001
June -Sept.
T3471
I
NoA
Wheat
144
13.34
1920,96
Sept. - April
OPTIONAL
1
2828
*annual PAN
2
INoA
Small Grain(G)
501
10.17
508.5
Sept pril
Total 1 27.911 7,269-313 1
*This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N Inust be based on reaLLstic V1111d =potation,
NOTE, Tho applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requiremenfs. Beginning In 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in some
eastern counties of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients.
This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2
4, 1

fa�
ell
Table 2. ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only If operator does not own adequate land [see
Required SpecIfIcation 21)
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
F1 0. Type Per Acre* Itilized I
* See footnote for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 27.91 7.269
Table 2 0.00 -
Total 27.91 7.269
Amount of N Produced 6,714
Surplus or Deficit —(555)
NOTE., The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient r1ch and will require precautionary measures to prevent over
applIca don of nutrient or other elements.
Page 3

See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field Soil Type Crop Application Application
No. Rate On/1-10 Amount (In.)
2,3,4
NoA
Bermuda
0.5
.5-1.0
1
NoA
Row Crops
0.5
.5-1.0
THIS TABLE 19 NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE
WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for IM days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every Q MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stored in your structure exceed Elevation *see lagoon desion.
.Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly So# Conservatton Service) or Soil
and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the
waste.
Narrative of operation: This is a"wetted acres" plan, combining two existing facilities.
Page 4

j�:
A
r
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not -reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation In the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of
an agreement with a landowner who Is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the
use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soil type, available moisture. historical data, climatic conditions, and level
of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application,for other
nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less then 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less then 10 tons per acre per
year providing grass filter strips are Installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG
Standard 393 - Filter Strip).
5 Odors Gan be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil Incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland.
the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsIte or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface Is frozen.
Page 5

ONPPLAN�`._
Al W 1Z
M C M
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a
high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils shoutd be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste
shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy,
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 60 feet from any residential property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal
waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer then 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer then 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, and on other,gressed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates In a
manner that courses no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
Page 6

17i
FNE"R RON,; R MUr
M
2
iol I , - 0Z
- I ITI
W !E-ZE TMA RP'N
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced as necessary to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage or discharge,
is If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closum plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that Includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, If animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption it should only be app:-od pre -plant with no further applications animal waste
during the crop season,
21 Highly visible markers shall be Installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metal approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop'production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for -five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23
Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
Page 7

YVASIE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:
Ownerl Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the
farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (OEM) before the
new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less
severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm
office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by OEM upon request.
Name uf Facility Owner:
(Please prtnt)
Signature..\,/ 'I.., Date.
I '11-C U
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Technical Specialist. (Piease prino Kraig A. Westerbeek
Affiliation: Murphy Family Farms
Address (Agency):
P.O. Box 759
Rose Hill, NIC 28458
Signature: Date: -7-
Page 8

i
IJ7
(j
ILI
1
0
C)
(,1
4-,,
0
0
-C
I
IS
(A
F
(P
E
-1
61
LA
r7
Ll
[A
Ln
17
D
F
5
kA
N

WI
Ix
IT'
nj
CP
14
IJ
01

Cm,4
55. 7
A
r14
q1, r7 1 4 e�). 5 (4)) 911.
-7
e,ogo 111-5
i --.I
?0. e-1 ' 4 3) t e7D
" . 9 �, k r �
i - 41

il
. A
nvirochem
Environmental Cbemists, Inc.
WZ Windmill WLty - Wi6nngwn. North Czniinj :3405
1910) '9�1-w'-d � pax!
� emwl*w�--.Om
CONSULTING
C�-IEMMTS NCDENR: 0 WQ CERTIMCATE *N. DL�S CERTIP(I k 7-"4 #37"729
CA72� Seprerrber -9, 210CC
7n NCDENR-1)WQ
A==NrJCN� �Iike WIRcr-s
'C�M. Lew Hicks
-Gu&�E=c 7- Ar-.aiyti=i Laboratory Services
Fecal =1&rm i'cr samples rece�ved:
r-lordcry - -r'1MLrsdQY, normal hours tiil!5;;m
Mordcy - Thursdc7y, cut5lde normal hours
Fridcy, requiring wee.k-.ena war,'<
Seurdoy ard SLr.dCy
5003, for samples received:
Wednesday - Friday
�,Iorc�cy and Tuesday, requiring weekend wcrk
Ammonia
Tl,','N .
Nitrate + Nitrite
T&,al Pl1CSPhCLrs
"os-r all metals
Merc,--ry
516-00ea
520.00ea
530.00ea
936.00ec
sla.00ea
s3aobea
$15.00ec
520.00ec
Zo-d VzVt, z6E 0r6
LU843O.A�Au3 dvz:zo To-OE-Bnv

:t. Dri V or makts, c-?1e& for each trip,
21 11 end of each rron,.h. 3,end wWie 4n;I
yellow rop;es 192 v�sncy budget owicef"
pink tcpy sit" ',rP vehip-0a.
i.,A;%n,-y bvdgal officcr sendt w�%ilv
copy ro moior Fleet Moriagernont.
S. Majot ft,ml matap;vnment Wills agency,
-.-, � Ur f4QRrA CARO,-(No,
DEPARTMEENT OF' ADMINISTRAT)ON
mCl"PIR FLCET MANAr-V1AZNT 01V�510N
. RIL�-Elom
TRAVEU UOG
FOR PERMANENTLY ASESIGNED
Charge
Min;rnurn I
Toiif Ammuni I
Dept. -Y DLPT./Off. No.
�i3g,*
� Fund No. RCC NO.
�-IIIQ113Q-311
11�6)V,Pdusl Rexponliwe for Vehiclel App?*vAl of Ageney Hwid or SwperAor. ve�%;t�e No Fw, PA=lh of
1 7
TBS
TRUMP OAI-.S
0 FFICIA� 1;5�vil
CPTIPICAVON 0Z)OM-E I V MILE
Purpose of Trip S;Qn4tVT% PEAWNG TAAV�L!E)
Leave
Reuml
10
IN
IN r
OUT
T
t4
OU7
IN
CZ7
r S LIN 9
IJ
6UT
[_IN
UU7
IN
OUT
ILI
I I
I
IN
FU- t , I
F N
OUT
IN
OUI
IN
OUT
IN
F0-7771
bur
CUT
OUT
tm
OUT
o LfT
OLIT
IN
C)UT
IN
OUT
IN
IZUT
IN
of Tfi;r.
Number
Trip Da
i TY)ps
Be Et-od of Month.
Qd*rnew 'Ae4dmgz.

NNA��Michael F. Easley, Governor
A) William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 10, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7002 2410 0006 9367 9440
RET JRN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Craig King
126 Garland King Road
Teachey, NC 28464
Subject: Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement
King Farms K-4 & K-5
Fac i I ity N umber: 3 1-467
Duplin County
Dear Mr, King:
Thi s is to notify you of a vi olation of North Carol i na General Statute 143 -215. 1.
On April 4, 2003, animal waste runoff from an application field of the referenced facility discharged into
an unnamed tributary of Oakie Branch. Oakie Branch is class C Sw waters of the State within the Cape
Fear River basin. This is a violation of N.C.G,S. 143-215.1 that requires that no person shall make an
outlet into the waters of the State without having obtained and abided by the appropriate permit.
In response to this violation, a detailed Plan of Action must be submitted to this office. This Plan of
Action must include the following:
The violation and the cause of the violation.
b. A description of the actions taken to stop and correct the violation.
C. A description of the actions taken and proposed to be taken to prevent the recurrence of
the violation.
d. A list showing the dates for the accomplishment of these actions,
This office must receive the proposed written Plan of Action within fifteen days of your receipt of this
notice.
You may wish to contact your County Soil & Water Conservation District Office, County Extension
office, a quali fied techn ical spec ial ist, and/or a professional engi neer for any assistance they may be able
to provide.
Vex.
N. C. Division of Water Quality 127 CardinaJ Drive Extension [phone]
Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington, NC 28405 (910) 350-204 Fax
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

. A.
Craig King
King Farms K-4 & K-5
April 10, 2003
Page Two
Be advised that this office is considering recommending assessment of civil penalties to the Director of
the Division of Water Quality for the above noted violation. This violation may result in civil penalties of
up to $25,000 in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A(a)(2). You may also be
assessed for reasonable costs of the investigation in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.3(a)(9), If you have an explanation for this violation that you wish to present, please submit your
written response along with the Plan of Action. Your response will be forwarded to the Director along
with the enforcement package for his consideration.
Be advised that the Division of Water Quality may take further action in this matter including assessment
of civil penalties, injunctive relief, and permit revocation.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call Mr. Stonewall Mathis at
910-395-3900 ext. 203 or Mr. Steve Lewis at 919-733-5083 ext. 539.
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
CC' B il ly Houston, DupI in County S oil and Water Conservation D istrict.
Patrick Fussell, DSWC-WiRO
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown, LLC
DWQ Central Files
DWQ Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Wilmington Files 31467
S:\WQS\ANIMALS\DUPLIN\2003\31-467novrfe
Er
—0
M A,
Ir -Pq
$
d
ment
U 'row
.ni
tzl
C3
wR
V*-Oape COM,
MMO
C,
re
S VO V.
IPO

Radio T
Ak.
L
, J.
k
22,5
Illy
1P
j
Aep,
.2
—70 If N
04- V Ito
'Z
A ,
j
CL, 'Os
T
Izo
Ali
'27 2 23
(r 230 (WALLAC4E EASTI
I Published by the Geological Survey 54V N MW 232
GAA. and North Carolina Geodetic Survey SCALE 1:24 ON
metric methods from aerial photographs M%'- .5
Ked 1979. Map edited 1981 low a
ot grid ficks- North Carol ina coordinate 1 5
al conic)
insverse Mercator grid, zone 18
T-1 6 %ff L--s 1'4 1' IDM a
mm. _10 M,— 1000 20M XKU 4WO
LS 7DOD
SM
CONTO(W INTERVAL 2 ME-TERS
%'ALTwWQA' ns:nnv-nr WWWAL nATITM ri

Environmental Chemists, Inc.
envirochem-�
L —.A-die 6602WiFidmil[Way o Wilmington, North Carolina 29405
[phone] (Lab) - [phone] (Fax)
[e-mail]
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING J�FAPR 1 S 20111
CHEMISTS B
NCDENR-, DWQ CERTIFICATE #94, DLS CERTIFICATE #37729
1�� i___ It I -I
Customer:
NCDENR-DWQ
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext,
Wilmington, NC 28405
Attn: Stonewall Mathis
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Date Sampled-, 04/04/03
Sampled By: Stonewall Mathis
WASTEWATER:
IPARAMETER Fsample ID
I Lab ID
Nitrate + Nitrite Nitrogen, NO3+NO2-N mgfL
Date of Report: April 14, 2003
Purchase Order #:
Report Number: 3-1888
Report To: Stonewall Mathis
Project:
Up
Field
Down
Hwy I I
# 4485
N 4486
N 4487
04488
0.14
o,25
< 0.025
0.12
Ammonia, NH3-N mg/L 0.6 42 10.5 1 12 1
Total Phosphorus, P mg/L
0,06
16.9
1.31
0.93
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, TKN mg/L
1.4
375
13.4
15.7
oliform, colonies/100 mL
118
1,600,000 est.
41,000
> 6000
Comments:
Reviewed byc'�) .:K

pp�- -- -41
envirochem,,
Analytical & Consulting Chemists
Client: NC.DCQ6Z -DwQ
Collected By: -'�'4 Wc, I 1 M14 h'(5
R I
amnif- Tvnpi I = Infimpnt- F. = F.Miapint. W
I
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS,, INC
Sample C-ollection and Chain of Custody
NCDENR; DWQ Certilkate #94, DLS Ceelftcak AM29
m- Rn =qnii- qi �=
�0 " ot;'IA
6602 Windmfll Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Emmi1:EchemWAaQLcow
Report o: -3 — / 9 & ��
Sample Identification
Collection
.2
CL
-'9 !0
0
CL. 0
U
U
X rz
PRESERVATION
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
0
DATE
TU*M
TFMlp
U
Wei
ST
IV
e
iij
-
M -
G
414103
160:5
C
tv
F-e nq
G
P,.,e I A
LI/410*3
1 C'05
A'j;'y-
C
LI/
7--7
G
101i� 5-0
-<- T
C ,
f)
(W -
—
---
C
TE
11��T
G
C!
Lj
—&L
G
C
�?F
I
G
C
P
G
G
C
F
G
G
NOTICE - DECHLORINATION: Samples for Ammonia, TKN, Cyanide, Phenol, and Bacteria must be dechlorinated
(0.2 ppm o less) in the field at the time of collection. See reverse side for instructions.
Transfer
Relinquished By:
Date/Time
Received By:
Date/Time
1.
2.
Temperature whcn Received: i. 3 'C� Accepted: jX RePoed: Resample Requested:
Delivered By: 21f�� Received By: ---- C,
Date: _09-k-���Tinie:
Comments: k;--, *41 Z/�s

TWORTANT NOTICE
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) is strictly enforcing EPA regulatioas for sample collection and
preservation.
Client Must Provide the FollowingWormation
1 SAMPLE -IDENTIFICATION (Container Associated with requested testing)
2. SAWLE TYPE (Composite, Grab, Water, Soil, etc.)
3. DATE COLLE
4. TIME COLLECTED
SAMPLE COLLECTOR
PRESERVAnQN (Including Temperature and pH)
Temperature: Samples MUST be reffigerated or received on ice between 2-an 6 ' . pl r ived
A f Sam es ece
within two (2) hours of collection must show a downward trend. Therefore, please record temperature at
collection in space provided on collection sheeL
pH: A two (2) hour timit to chemically, pTeserve samples by pH a4justment is allowed, except_for metals
samples reported to the Groundwater Section which must be acidified at the time of collection.
Caution
These sample bottles may contain small amounts of acid or other corrosive and potentially harmful
chemicals. Laboratories are required to add these chemicals for certain analyses in order to comply
with EPA preservation requirements. Use extreme care when opening and handling the bottles. If
any chemical should get on your sldn or clothes flush liberally with water and seek medical attention.
D&CHLORINATION INSTRILCTIONN
CAUTION: DO NOT Mix fluosulfate with acid in bottle before collecting samples as a
violent reaction will occur.
Dechlorinating Sarogles that Require Acid Preservation
L Add 4-5 granules of thiosulfate to abottle with no acid preservative (unpreserved ROD/TSS bottle),
2. After miydtLg to dissolve the thiosulfate, pour half of the sample into a bottle containing acid as a
preservative (AmmoniwTKN).
3. Then completely fill both bottles,.w,ith fresh sa'�'niple.
The Laboratory will verify and document the above'requested information.
ref NCAC 2H,0805 (a) fy) M.
"At any time a laboratory receives samples which do not meet sample collection, holding time, o� preservation
-requirernents� the laboratory must notify the sample collector or dient and secure another sample if possible. If another
sample cannot be secured, the original sample may be analyzed, but the results reported must be qualified with the nature
of the infraction(s). And the laboratory must notify the State Laboratory about the infraction(s). The notification must
include a statement indicating corrective actions taken to prevent the problem forfuture samples.
ref, Nr.M 2R0805 (a) (7) M."

0 NN A
co Du
April 16, 2003
CERTIFIED MAI
RETURN RECEEPT REQUESTED
Craig King
126 Garland King Road
Teachey NC 28464
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Request for Information
Inadequate Freeboard
King Farms K-4 & K-5
#31467
Duplin County
Dear Sir or Madam:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
On April 11, 2003, a representative of your animal operation informed the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) that there was inadequate freeboard in the lagoon(s) serving this facility.
This lack of adequate freeboard is in non-compliance with the Certificate of Coverage
issued to this facility on October 1, 1998. In addition to this Notice of Violation (NOV), this
non-compliance is subject to an appropriate enforcement action by DWQ. This action can
consist of one or more of the following: a civil or criminal enforcement action; an injunction;
and/or a requirement to apply for coverage under an individual permit. The action chosen will
be based on complete evaluation of all factors that resulted in the inadequate freeboard; the
actions taken to restore the needed freeboard, and the actions being proposed to prevent the
problem from reoccurring.
To assist us in our review, please provide the Wilmington Regional Office with an
evaluation of the reasons for the freeboard violation(s) and a strategy to prevent future freeboard
violation(s). This evaluation and strategy must include but is not limited to the following:
Current Freeboard level(s)
Freeboard level records in the lagoon(s) for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
Spraying records for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
Customer Sen4ce; Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location;
1-87-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
.Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Cou Her #52-01 -01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Aclwn Employer
50% recycledl 10% post -consumer paper
h11p:1ffi2o.enr.state-nc.u8

Inadequate Freeboard
Pago 2
Rainfall records for the past 12 months for this site up to the date of submittal (if
available)
Cropping system and PAN specified in the CAWMP. If the cropping system was not in
compliance with the facility's CAWMP, provide details of the cropping system in place
for the past 12 months.
A summary of actions taken to restore the needed freeboard in the lagoon(s) including but
not limited to removal of aninials from the site, delay of restocking of animals, pumping
and hauling waste to another site (specify site), securing additional irrigation equipment,
and securing additional spray sites.
A description of water conservation measures in use at the facility and the date(s)
installed.
If the lagoon level(s) are still in violation of the facility's CAWMP and Permit, provide
an updated Plan of Action as to how the facility will return to compliance.
Provide a detailed description of the actions taken or proposed to be taken to insure that
there are no further freeboard violations at this facility.
This information must be received by the Wilmington Regional Office at the following
address no later than 10 days following receipt of this letter.
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-2845
Once this information is received and evaluated by the DWQ staff, a determination will
be made as to the appropriate compliance/enforcement actions to be taken. Each case will be
evaluated on its own merit. The efforts by the owner/producer to notify DWQ of the problem,
efforts made to resolve the problem -once identified, and efforts proposed to prevent future
problems will be positive factors in this determination.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you either the responsibility or
liability for this non-compliance or future cases of non-compliance. If you have any questions
regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact our Wilmington Regional Office Staff at
[phone].
)�Jj
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Central Files

10 - -
AUG 0 12001
Wettable A cres. h4apWnafian G ficat.lon
Name of Facility:
-Facility Number- 24-L.
owner(s) Nme: Phone No:,,1%S - _D-L49
Mailing Address:
By signing thLs forin, the facility owner and Techxxic4 Specialist acknowledge the completion of the
Wettabla Acres Deterraination. AJI necessary Wettable Acre Determination Field Data Shems and
calculations were completed to conduct a Wettable Acre Determination. The facility's Waste
Utilization Plan has been amanded as necessary to refect actual wetted acreage. A copy of all
workshee% c4culations, and other Wettable Acres Determination docuinents, along with the
applicable Waste Ulilization Plan and Wettable Acre Doterrnination. Certification will be filed with
the local Soil and Water Conservation DistricL A copy will also be kept on site with the Certified
Animal Waste Managment Plan. Any future modifications must be approved by a technical
specialist and filed with the Soil and Witter Conseivation District prior to irnple=entation. If any
modifications.to the existinjjLTigation &y§LeM.A[.Agy. new irri to.
adequately address the waste n=agernent needs of this facility, an Irrigation Specialist or
Professional Enginm has certified the design and installation below.
I I
Owner
Owner
Technical Specialist Name: tl�_Tct:'a
Tectmical Specialist Signaturc:
If asWsted by an IxTigation Specialist or Profewfonal Engineer pleme read and sign below-.
Animal waste application equipment has been designed or modified to apply waste as necessary to
acconunodatc the waste management plan and according to NRCS Standards. Animal waste
applimion e.vipment has been installed according to NRCS Standards and is ready for use.
Irrigation Speclalist/PE Name:
laigation Specialist/PF, Signature.-- 'Date:
Submit this forrh to:
Attn: Sonya Avant
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 -Mail Service Center
Raleisb, NC 27699-1617
WADC — 7199
t Id �60 ffil NPIU111.1 NVI�XINI Wd6l:�'

I
�1 � - ---- - 1. -- i --. -.A I'll
'14 il
PRODUCER: Craig King 4&5
LOCATION: 126 Garland King Rd.
Teachey, NC 28466
TELEPHONE: [phone]
TYPE OPERATION: Existing Combination Swine Farm
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 1860
(Design Capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is
to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all
plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it
is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a
growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the
waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
tech niq ues, preparation, and tra nsfer of waste sam ples to the lab for an a lysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
Page 1

a
1,860 animals X 3.583870968 (tons) waste/animal/year =
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
1,860 animals X 3,60967741 lbs. PAN/animal/year
Guide Std. 633) -
6,666 (tons) waste/year.
6,714 lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from N.C.
Tech
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Fielld* Soll Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Tvpe Per Acre Utilized Anolication
T3471
2
NoA
Bermuda(G)
2551
10.17
2593.35
March - Sept.
T351 1
3
NoA
Bermude(G)
255
2.58
657.19
March -Sept.
T3511
4
NoA
Bermuda(G)
255
1.81
461.55
March - Sept.
T351 1 &
3,4
NoA
Small Grain(G)
50
14.57
728.5
Sept. - April
T3471
I
NoA
Corn
130
13.34
1734.2
March - August
T3471
I
NoA
Soybeans
150
13,34
2001
June -Sept.+
T3471
1 JNoA
Wheat
144
13.34
1920.961
Sept. - pril
OPTIONAL
I
28281*annual
PAN
1 2 INGA
Small G rain(G)
501
10.171
508.51
Sept. - 4(il
Total 1 27-911 7,269.38 1
*This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N must-i2a based on reagstic rield Mectation,
NOTE. The applicator Is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeth7g the N
requirements. Beginning In 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers In some
eastern counties of North Caroline to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nuffients.
This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2

U ME MI,
'WER. fflmmffi�� MIN mRSA
S 1Z . -]I -
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only If operator does not own adequate land [see
RoquIred Specification 21)
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# 110. Type Per Acre* Itilized A
pplication
* See footnote for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 27.91 7,269
Table 2 0.00
Total 27.91 7,269
Amount of N Produced 6,714
Surplus or Deficit (555)
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over
application of nutrient or other elements.
Page 3

See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water,
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field Soil Type Crop Application Application
No. Rate (In/Hr) Amount (In.)
2,3.4
NoA
Bermuda
0.5
.5-1.0
1
NoA
Row Crops
0.5
.5-1.0
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE
WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for 18D days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every E MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stored in your structure exceed Elevation *see lagoon design.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (fortnerly Soil Conservation Service) or Soil
and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the
waste.
Narrative of operation: This is a "wetted acres" plan, combining two existing facilities.
Page 4

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of
an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the
use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3 Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level
of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less then 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per
year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG
Standard 393 - Filter Strip).
5 Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there Is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil Incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland,
the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies,
Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
Page 5

__A'�SMEJ�U'_Frl Offif *;m's
IN
�,, W�,
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on sofls with a
high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste
shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following*
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal
waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer then 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters. drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that courses no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
Page 6

MAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced as necessary to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge. pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However. If animal waste 'is used on crops for direct human
consumption it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications animal waste
during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metal approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23
Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
Page 7

Name of Farm: \,<, 'A +- 5
Owner/ Manager Agreement
Y' C"% C.
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the
farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the
new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less
severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm, The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm
office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by OEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner:
(Please print)
Signature..\,/ 'L. Date:
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Ptease print) Kraig A. Westerbeek
Affiliation: Murphy Family Farms
Address (Agency): P.O. Box 759
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Signature: Date: -7-:L0 -0�
Page 8

Sheeff
CALCULATIONS
Sprinkler SpeCifications
Sprinkler Type: Nelson 150
Nozzle Size,.
1.08 Inches
Sprinkler Pressure:
60 psi
Flowrate(GPM):
182 gpm
Wetted Diameter:
300 feet
Lane Spaclo"
Desired Spacing (%): 70 %
Design Spacing(feet): 210 *PVC Irrigation pipe normally comes in 20'pieces,
so round to the nearest multiple of 20.
Actual Spacing (feet): 240 feet
Actual Spacing 80 %
APPlocatign Rate
Application Rate = (96.3xFlowrate)/(3.1415x(.9xradius)squared)
Design App. Rate =
0,31 in/hr
300 degree are =
0.37 In/hr
220 degree are =
0.50 ln1hr
180 degree arc =
0.61 In/hr
Trameller Speed
Travel speed = 1.605 x Flowrate I Desired application amount x Lane Spacing
Desired app. (in.) =
0.75 Inches
300 degree arc =
1.62 ft/min
220 degree arc =
1.95 ft/min
180 degree arc =
Mainline Velojady
3.25 ft1min
Velocity = .408 x Flowrate I pipe diameter squared feet/sec.**
"For buried pipelines, velocity should be below 5 feet per second
Pipe size:
inches
Velocity=
#DIV/01 ft/sec.
Page I

Sheeff
Most distant hydrant:
Total distance: feet
Friction Loss is figured using Hazen/William's Equation
FrictionLoss= #DIV/01 feet/100feet
Max. Mainline Loss= #DIV/01 feetor #DIV/01 psi
Sprinkler Pressure:
60 psi
Loss through traveller-
psi
Elevation head:
psi
Mainline toss:
#DIV/01 psi
Suction head and lift:
psi
5% fitting loss:
#DIV/01 psi
TOTAL(TDH) =
4DIV/01 psi or #DIV/01 feet
Horsepower Required
Horsepower = Flowrate x TDH(feet) / 3960 / Pump effeclency
Pump Description:
Pump Efficiency: %
Horsepower Required: #DIV/01 Hp
Thrust Blockft
Thrust Block Area = Thrust I Soil Bearing Strength
Thrust:
feet
Soil Bearing Strength:
feet
End Cap:
#DIV/01
ft2
90 degree elbow:
#DIVIOI
ft.2
Tee:
#DIV/01
ft2
45 degree elbow:
#DIV/01
ft2
Pipe Pressure -Rating Chec
Pressure Rating of Pipe to be Used: psi
Max. Pressure on system when running: #DIV/01 psi
70% of Pressure Rating: 0 psi
If Max. Pressure on system is less than 70% of Pressure Rating, OK
Page 2

Sheet8
ACREAGE CALCULATIONS
CRAIG KING - K4&5
7127101
Total
Width
Lenoth
Star[ Pnd
Sko-End
Acm
fioi�
1
270
850
0.77
0.63
6.67,
1
13.34
2
270
850
0.77
0.63
6.671
3
170
470
0.43
0.31
2.571
21
10.17
4
2401
520
0.73
0�59
4.19
5
2701
325
0.77
0.63
3.41
6
270
310
0.66
0
2.58
31
2,58
7
220
270
0.45
0
1.81
41
1.81
p
1
2-7.91
Page I

Sheet2
TABLE 2 - Travelling Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment: 3"Travellers
Field No. Travel Application TRAVELLANE Wetted Nozzle Operating Operating
and Speed Rate Effective Effecirive Diameter Diameter Pressure Pressure Arc
Hydrant No. Wmin) (inthr.) Width(ft.) LenO(ft) (feet) (inches) at Gun(psi) at reel(psi) Pattern Comments - Acres per pull
TOTAL ACRES=

a

Sheetl
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: Craig King - K4&5
Address* 126 Garland King Rd.
Teachey, NG 2a464
Telephone: [phone]
Table 1 - Field Specifications
Approximate
Maximum
Useable, SIze
Field of Field
Number (acresL
soil -Type Slope % crop(s)
County: Duplin
Date: 7/27/01
Maximum
Maximum
Application
Application
per Irrigation
Rate
Cycle
En/hr)
Cnches) Comments
Pulls 3.4,5

Qlj
461
ZA
vti-
. ..... 49
V1, S4n 0
Is
'47
Co
e t
4V;
Owl.
k j�
m M
MAk
[Ai lk,
q� 'C� -i4
411 :9
ga
41,
1 4
all
jR.
Aj m 0
(jo
nj 4 0 F
t I 'o 4r,
'AD 0
all

ir I
A T,,,-
0 19,
February 9, 2001
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7000 1670 0005 7386 0529
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Craig King
King Farms K-4 & K-5
126 Garland King Road
Teachey, NC 28464
Subject: Notice of Violation
King Farms K-4 & K-5
31-467
Duplin County
Dear Mr. King-.
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Qualily
This is to notify Craig King, who holds Certificate of Coverage AWS310467 under
Swine Waste General Permit AWG100000 issued pursuant to North Carolina General Statute
143-215.1, of violations of the General Permit.
On December 11, 2000, Mr. Stonewall Mathis of the Wilmington Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quaiity performed an inspection Of YOUT animal operation and the animal
waste management system serving this operation. During the inspection, Mr. Mathis observed
the following:
I ) Your app] i cati on records show that ani mal waste was appi i ed to rye on Tract 3 511
Field I and Tract 3471 Field I (hydrants 5, 6, and 7) during the time period of
October 2000 through November 9, 2000. Soybeans were in these land
application fields at the time of inspection. These applications of animal waste
occurred after the ending application window of September 15 for soybeans.
They also occurred more than 30 days prior to planting of rye. Therefore, these
applications of animal waste are violations of Part 1. Performance Standards,
Section 2 of the General Permit which incorporates the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP) into the General Permit and specifies that any
violation of the CAWMP shall be considered a violation of the General Permit;
Wilmington Regional Off -ice Phone: [phone]
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Fax: [phone]
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845

Mr. Craig King
February 9, 2001
Page Two
the CAWMP under the Animal Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) specifies that the
application window for soybeans ends on September 15 and under the WUP
Required Specifications Section 10 requires that animal waste not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting a crop.
2) Tract 3511 Field 2 (part of the land application fields of hydrants I and 2) is being
used as a cattle feedlot which has partly resulted in a poor condition of the
receiving crop. It was noted during the inspection that your application records
show that applications of animal waste were made to rye in these fields during the
time period of October 2000 through November 8, 2000. This is a violation of
Yart 11. Operation and Maintenance Requirements, Section I of the General Pennit
which requires that the land application fields be maintained at all times and
properly operated. This field should be properly maintained as a land application
field, or it should be removed from the WUP and application of animal waste to
these areas should cease with the acreage for these areas- being discounted for
record keeping purposes.
3) Since the time of the inspection, during a review of the files at the Wilmington
Regional Office, a WUP for your facility dated September 9, 1998 was
discovered. The most recent WUP that was available at the time of inspection
was dated July 21, 1997. This is a violation of Part 1(4) of the General Permit
which requires that a copy of the CAWMP be readily available at the farm; the
WUP is part of the CAWMP.
4) Lagoon design/volume check information was not available for inspection. This
is a violation of Part 1(4) of the General Pen -nit which requires that a copy of the
CAWMP be readily available at the farm; lagoon design/volume check
information is part of the CAWMP.
5) Freeboard records from 1999 were not available for inspection. This is a violation
of Part 111. Monitoring and Reporting Requirements, Section 5 of the General
Permit which requires that records be maintained and be readily available for
inspection.
6) You need to use a waste analysis dated within 60 days of each application event
for calculations on the application records in accordance with Part 111(4.5) of the
General Permit.

Mr. Craig King
February 9., 2001
Page Three
7) Your application records show the acreage for Tract 3471 Fields 2-5 (hydrants I -
4) as 20.3 acres while the WUP shows this acreage as 15 acres. Also, your
appl i cati on records show the acreage for Tract 3 5 11 Fi el d I (hydrant 5) as 4.7
acres while the WUP shows this acreage as 3.6 acres. You need to maintain your
records based on the acreage in the WUP in accordance with Part 111(5) of the
General Permit.
8) You need to put a floatation device on the intake for the irrigation systern.
Please submit a Plan of Action which addresses the above noted violations and items.
The Plan of Action should include a list of any and all modifications that have been and will be
implemented to correct the noted violations and items and prevent their recurrence along with a
timetable for completion of the modifications. The written Plan of Action must be submitted to
this office within ten (10) days of receipt of this notice.
Be advised that the Division of Water Quality may take further action in these matters
including assessment of civil penalties, injunctive relief, and permit revocation,
If you have any questions concerning this matter, piease do not hesitate to call Mr.
Stonewall Mathis at 910-395-3900 ext. 203.
Sincerely,
5: � &44— JJezn
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation
Patrick Fussell, DSWC-WiRO
Ronnie Kennedy, Duplin County Health Department
Star Maready, Duplin County Cooperative Extension
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy Farms -:-
DWQ Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
V��gj2n �iIST97
S:\WQS\ANIMALS\I)UPLIN\2001 \31-467nov

U.S. POSA S'brvice
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT
cr (Domestic Mail Otily; No Msurance Coverage Provided)
ru
Ln
C3 Q.?wA L
-0
c13 postage
m
17� Certified Fee
4,
Ln Return Receipt Fee am
C-3 QEodorsemerrt Required)
C3
r3 Restflcted Delivery Fee
1:3 �Er4orsarnant RequiraM
111`� TbW Polptage A Pme $
-0
-A sent
C3 --- ---- ----------
'6'
C3 St t. Ap®r.IV BT No.
C3 AU,
........................
-----------
r- State P-4
�Ide Rever se for I i istruc t io iis

5Z, 0
mf 9a 0
126 GARLANo KING ROAD
TEACHEY, N.C. 28464
910-285-2692
February 20, 2001
Mr. Rick Shivar
Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regional office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Subject: King Farms 4 & 5
31-467
Dear Sirl
F
CEIV -D
7FE9 21 Z001
I have addressed each item (1-8) and these problems will be taken care
of. We are now contract growers for Murphy Family Farms. I have
requested them to help us get our files, spray fields and WUP's up to
date.
(1) It was our intention to plant rye, but soybeans were still there
because it was too wet in low areas for the combine to stand up. It did
not get dry enough until after Thanksgiving. This was not done
intentionally. I am aware of the window for soybeans. These soybeans
were not planted until the 2nd week in July, therefore they were still
green and taking nitrogen until October.
(2) Murphy Family Farms is in the process of reworking our WUP's on
all farms. While pumping with hydrant I & 2 we have been stopping it at
the fence line and not pumping in feedlot area. We should have reduced
pumping acres to allow for feedlot area.
(3) 1 was not aware the most current WUP's were not in files. I will
check all files to make sure current WUP's are in the proper place.
(4) 1 will get a copy from Soil and Water Conservation and put in file.
(5) 1 was not aware 1999 freeboard readings were not in file. We have
those readirgs,in our office files. I will make sure they are in the
proper place.

(6) 1 have informed each farm that lagoon samples are to be taken on a
regular basis to be within 60 days of pumping.
(7) This problem will be corrected immediately. Murphy Family Farms
has our files and I will relay messages to them.
(8) 1 will put floation devices on all lagoon pipes.
If you need more information please write or call me.
Since y,
a�ig Kii
fWC

03/08/1999 04:17 9102896442
LAND&NUTRIENT MGMT
PAGE 01
WurpfiyEanns Land csZ Xuth�ent %f anagement - ftgister Office
P.O. Boy, 759, q�qse Yfzff, Xonh Carolina 910-289-2111
To:
Phone-,
Fax phone:
CC -
Date: %— 1�.. --o �
Number of pages Including cover sheet:
From:
LNM - Register Office
Local Phone: [phone]
Phone; 1-800-311-9458
ESPkAe; 910-299-6442
REMARKS: El Urgent For your review 0 Reply ASAP El Please comment
LA

03/08/1999 04:17 9102B96442 LAND&NUTRIENT MGMT PAGE 02
........ ..............
V41%
1,860 animals X 3.883AM96fl (tons) waste/animal/year = 6,666 (tons) waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
1,860 animals X 3,fiQ2fiZZ4JJ lbs. PAN/animallyear 6,714 lbs. PA"ear. (PAN from N.C.
Guide Std. 633) Tech
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCEiq
Tract Field* Sall Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. TvD9 Per Acre Utilized AoDfication
T3471
2
NoA
Bermuda(G)
265
10.17
2593.36
March - S2Z.
T3511
3
NoA
Bernmuda(G)
255
2.58
657.9
March - Sept.
T3511
4
NoA
Sermuga
�G)
255
1.81
461.65
March - Sept,
T351 1
3,4
NoA
Small Grain(G)
50
4.3191
219.5
Seet. - April
T3471
I
NoA
Corn
130
13.34
1734.2
March - August
T3471
1
NoA
SOYb*ahS
1 150
13.34
21301
June -Sept.+
T3471_
1 __
JNoA
Wheat
1441
13.34
MOM
Sept. - A
OPTIONAL
1 :::�2828
'annual PAN
2 — INOA
Small Grain Q)
501
10.171
508.51Sept.
- April
Total 1 27-911 6,760-30 1
*This N Is from animal waste only, ff nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for, t be haned an rail sUadation.
NOTE.' The applicator Is caufloned thaf P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requimments. Beginning In 19918 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in some
eastern counties of NorM Caroline to have a nutrient management plan that addremses all nutrients.
This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2

03/08/1999 04:17 9102896442 LANDI&NUTRIENT MGMT PA13E 03
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement v4th adJacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land (see
Required Specification 21)
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs, N Month of
# No. Type Per Acre Itilized Ap
" See footnoie for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 27.91 6,760
Table 2 0.00 -
Total 27.91 6,760
Amount of N Produced 6,714
Surplus or Deficit (40)
NOTE., The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over
OPPlica d0n of nutrient or other elements. I
Page 3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Craig King
King Farins K-4 & K-5
126 Garland King Road
Teachey NC 28464
Dear Craig King:
il
A4
Auftftomwo - —Noon
A111111111111 ,
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RescIURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 31-467
Duplin County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRY], DRY2, DRY3, SLURI, SLUR2,
SLDI, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincere[
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility file
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment f_��rC E-4 TV
and Natural Resources "I
Division of Water Quality OCT 05 1998
james B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
BY
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary F
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Craig King
King Farms K-4 & K-5
126 Garland King Rd
Teachey NC 28464
Dear Craig King:
D
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NArURAL RESOURCES
October 1, 1998
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310467
King Farms K-4 & K-5
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin Couiity
In accordance with your application received on July 29, 1998, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) issued to Craig King, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the King Farms K-4 & K-5, located in Duplin County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 580 Farrow to Feeder and 1280 Feeder to Finish,
and the application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conforn-iity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
�bis COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 2762"535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS310467
King Farms K-4 & K-5
Page 2
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is'located in the Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Pertnit, please contact JR Joshi at [phone] ext. 363. '
Sincere
_�A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ce's)
Duplin County Health Department
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
0

­Stat; of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
I) James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
40 Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.L., Director
May 29,1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
MURN MCWT MQUESTED
Craig Kin
King Farms K4 & K-5
126 Garland King Rd
Teachey NC 28464
Farm Number- 31 - 467
Dear Craig King:
0
�4�
.19
m
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLI NT OF
E:NV1RONMENTftJ?4 &URCES
PW as;�;'
EC770/v
VUL 2 9 1998
JVMDir"'tW1919 PernVtU.,
You are hereby notified that King Farms K-4 & K-5, in accordance with G.S. 143-215. 1 OC, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has sixty (601 dqs to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement wions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partiatly completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Dave Holsinger with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Wilmington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0835 Telephone [phone] FAX[phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-oonsumer paper

State of North Carolina
Departmen t of Environ ment a n d Natu ral Respp"q V E D
Division of Water Quality WATER QUAUTY SECTION
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form 291998
rTHIS FORM MAYBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN OFJG
- Existing Liquid Animal Waste perations
General Permit I
Non -Discharge Perrnittrg
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: King Fam K4 & K-5
1.2 Print Land Ownees name: _Craig King
1.3 Mailing address: M Garland King Rd
City, State: Teachey NC Zip. 28464
Telephone Number (include area code): 910-285-2692
1.4 County where facility is located: DRlin
1.5 facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified). Farm Location: 140 Exit - N jLwy. UJ mile, turn
left on Farm Road 1/5 mile. 2 houses on left.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integratot's nar.ne (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/91
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.; 31 (county number); __j67 (facility number).
2.2 Opemtion Dei—cn-Ft�fory. Swine operation
Feede to Finish
Farrow to Feeder
1860- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? 56yes; F--]no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The"No. of Animals" should be the maximurn num5i7ror which the waste management structures were designed.
2�pe of Swine
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean (4 sow)
Farrow to Feeder (4 sow)
Farrow to Finish (# sow)
No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
Layer
Non -Layer
Turkey
Type of Cattle No. of Animals
Dairy
Beef
No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page I of 4 31-467

3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 55 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 16.4
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YIES or (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or 9 (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YE or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? 100
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
,X.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations w ere animal waste is land applied;
/3-3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations,
The CAWMP must include the following components:
,--3�3 .1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
/5-3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g.OSD
injection, etc.)
-1.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
.,T. 3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
oa,3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
,J�3-6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the VAR.
.Z. - 3.7 The PAN applied to every land a
pplication field.
4.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
-.w-;eS-3-9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
A-3. 10 A site schematic.
'VI I Emergency Action Plan.
3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
;3 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
e14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
.,of3. 15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
stire to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be apylicable to your facility.
10f.'30'16 Operation an Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMIP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
Applicants Initials
ce -
CAJ---
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 31-467

IL
Facility Number: 31 - 467
;Facility Name: King Farms K-4 & K-5
RECEIVED
WATER OUALITY SEC110N -
FJUL 2 9 1998
1
Non-D13charge Pernitury
4. APPYTANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I,— UA24P? ffgW4 (Land Owner's name listed in question 1-2), attest that
this application for k� (Facility name listed in question 1. 1)
has been reviewed by n1efand is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not co#' leted and !hat if §11 %<uired supporting information and anach en are not included, this application
package will be retu to me as mc
Signature . . 9= :'n=� Date 7--
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATIM: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
1, (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been review@ by me and is accurate and complete to the best —of my knowledge. I unUerstand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NVMBER.- [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 31-467

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: CRAIG KING
Location: 126 GARLAND KING RD
TEACHEY NC 28464
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation; Existing Combination Swine
Number of Animals: 1860.00 swine
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
Fa
3
The waste from your animal facility must be iand.applied at a
specified r6te to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
S tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frcz�n. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page; I

Jr 1.
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
I
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more tihan 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. ' In some cases you may want to have p�ant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A UCkC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
1860 swine x 3.58387096774 tons waste/swine/year = G666 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
1860 swine x 3.60967741935 lbs PAN/swine/year = 6713.99999999 lbs.
PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LES
COMM N
**
�* LES
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.�
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
3471
NOA
C
110
117.5
20
17.0
1997.5
1
MAR-JUN
3471
1-1
INOA
JW
I
160
1120 1
117.0
12040
OCT-MAR
3471
DSB
�-1
INOA
li
133-
1132 1
117.0
12244
JUN-
SEPT 15
3471
2 - 5
BP
4.6
1
1230 1
115.0
1.34-50
APR-SEP
3471
2-5
SG
1125
I-
li
11
175 1
115.0
ISEP-APR
3471
2-5
BP
4.6
I-
INOA
ii
I
1230 1
115.0
13450
APR-SEP
3471
2-5
SG
I-
li
11
175
115.0
�1125
SEP-APR
3511
NOA
3.6
11
1
1
1110
11,17.5 120
1
�423
MAR-JUN
3511
1-1
INOA
1W
I
160'
1120 1
13.6
1432
OCT-MAR
3511
DSE
1-1
INOA
133
1132 1
13.6
1475.2
JUN-
SEPT 15
3511
EP
4.6
12
INOA
li
I
1230 1
12.7
1621
APR-SEP
3511
SG
1-2
1
11
11
175 1
12.7
1202.5
SEP-APR
3511
NOA
BP
4.G
G21
1-2
1
li
I
1230
1
12.7
1 APR-SEP
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
3511 1-2 1 SG 11 175 1 12.7 1202.5
1I SEP-APR
I I END I I I I I I
TOTAL118408.7
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i,e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE- The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farme-rs in some parts of North Carolina to'have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
r
TABLE 2; ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You' may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BP
HYBRID BERMUDAGR-ASS-2ASTUR2
TONS
50
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
DSB
DOUBLE CROPPED SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
4
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
AC
75
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
WETTABLE
— ACRES_
38.3
LBS AW N USED
18408.7
0
0
38.3
18408.7
BALANCE
-11694.7
This number must,be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
APPLICATICN OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables I and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts.of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts. .1
Tract Field
3471
3471 2-S
Soil Type
NOA
Qre".'
jApplication RatelApplic. Amount
Crop (in/hr) (inches)
C
.50 0
.50 *J.. 0
Page *. 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
3471
NOA
DSB
.50
*1.0
3471
NOA
w
.50
*1.0
3471
-2-S
sc;
S
*1
3471
-2-5
SG
..5
*1
3471
-2-5
NOA
BP
.50
*]-.o
3511
1
NOA
c
.50
*1.()
3S11
2
NOA
BP
.50
*J.C)
3511
-1
NOA
DSB
.50
*J.C)
3511
-1
NOA
w
.50
*1.0
3511
-2
SG
.5
*1
3511
-2
sr.
.-9
3511
-2
NOA
BP
.50
*1.0
Page:

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
This is the maximu
assuming the amoun
applied. In many
be applied because
application amount
conditions.
m application amount allowed for the soil
t of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
situations, the application amount shown cannot
of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
shown can be applied under optimum soil
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the -
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
THIS PLAN IS WRITTEN BASED ON A TWO YEAR CROPPING ROTATION. TRACT 3471 FIELDS
2-5 ARE A COMBINATION OF THE TOTAL ACRES IRRIGATABLE, AS SEEN ON ATTACHED MAP
AND HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW, TOTAL ACRES 15.1. TRACT 3511 FIELD 2 IS A
COMBINATION OF THE TOTAL IRRIGATABLE ACRES, AS SEEN ON ATTACHED MAP AND
HIGHLIGHTED IN BLUE, TOTAL ACRES 4.0. ALL DITCHES HAVE BEEN REMOVED WITH THE
EXCEPTION OF THE ONE HIGHLIGHTED IN RED.
Page - 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste -utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at S or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. when applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies. I
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
3erms and structures should be inspected.regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:K4K5
OwnerlManager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of anima.1 waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: CRAIG KING
(Please print)
Signatur
e Date;
Name of Manager(If differprn from owner): -
Signature; ) Z Date:
Name of Person Preparing 11 �a.-' �Pleaaa print)BILLY W. HOUSTON
Affiliation:DUPIIN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Phone No. 910-296-2120
Address (Agency): PO BOX 277
KENANSVILLE NC 28349
Signature: Date:
Page: 13

N A T(51 �',/\ 1, 1Z I C) U TZ C I- �S Co 1\1 S V
C0fW-iF'I6/ATi0jN NZACTICl- STA,,`,,'PARD
NI1111-It-fif
M."J"INITION,
,hfugmii tlic amouw, form, :md
I IM 111! () f 11pl) i I C:� ([OTIS 0 F 11 LI -'�Cl -
11 11 R I I 0S E'
'J-0 SLJppl%1 [flaW IT.
diciatcd by soi] test, or ti'ssuc awilysis, 01
,iccepted recommend2tions based ()I)
VC311MG yleld expec t2tions w p�ant
perfO1711aTICC f0T an intended use
To minimize excessive numcni apifl Icat 1011
while Ineeting a plant's pe,-fo.-mance hased
requirement for a pai-ticular nutricilt
To minlMize nutTient loss to surface and
ground Nvater.
CONTI)MONS W'Er-,RE PRACTICE
.kPPLMS
On lands where nutrients are applied. This
standardapplies to management of nutrients
�ssdclatcd with organic waste, commercial
fertilizer, legume crops, and crop residues.
CI=RIA
Fertilizer source, time, and method of
application shall be planned to conform ' to
seasonal variation in plant uptake needs and
soil prof -lie properties to optimize economic
return and minimize nutrient loss by
leaching or surface transport. Nitrogen or
phosphorousare the most critical nutrients
in planning for water quality.
2. So i I PH a ffects the a va 11 abi I ity o f n utrien (s.
Use soil tests to adjust soil pH to the level
best suited for the crops being grown.
University crop produotion guides and the
North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals
'NI'aillial CNII n1so be consultcd m 1111d :111-�
va;uc
Soll sh�d'l bc icsied evc-1-y Iwo ye'lic.
der-)ciejicy ofany of the 16 essc,.Tnai
4Z];1PLr11s �;.Ijl 1111111 uplakc and of
0[�IC: n1.0-.0 aCHVC JWIIICD�S
So�� icsurlg Idenlifics these y1c1d limilim-1,
delir-i(Nicles as Wel) as
1 . n1batances, (:Xccsscs and levels potenflally
IONIC to pjants�
�4, Zinc ail(,� Copper levels ill the soils S!1�111 be
ji1oiwo,-cd �iiid alternative crop sites shall be
used -.vhen these metals approach c):c,-ss
leve]5. Refer to 'Fable 2 In Standard 623 for
threshold levels of these nutrients.
5. All sources and forms of plant nutrients
including carryover fTom legumes and
animal waste being made available for plut
gTowth aiid production shall be considered
in developing a nutHent management plan.
6. All animal waste products shall be analyzed
by the agronomic division of North Carolina
Department of Agriculture (NCDA) or other
acceptable laboratories and the
recommendations used to develop and
I . mplement a nutrient management prognm.
Waste shall be tested within 60 days of
utilization. Unless other -wise required
nitrogen shall be the rate -de term in ing
nutrient.
7. Establish a Realls6c Yield Expectation
(R-Y.E.) for any crop to be fertilized. This
is accomplished by determining the mean of
the best three yields of the last five
consccutive crop harvests, If this
i n formal ion is n ot ava il ab] e, R.Y. 17 — can be
estzblished ftorn specially developed soil
interpretation records for Nutrient
Coascrvviori prac iict s landards n rc -vitwrd pc Hodic a] ly and upd a ied �f nctdcd,
o obiain [11c curTnt vusion o( this stand.1fd, conract tht mitw�0 Rcsources Conscfwtinn
S�. vicr�

�,90-2
nl;Inaf'1CJJJCF)J plannimi, F'--irni Scrvicc
Agency rCC01-dS, LHIlVersily tnals, ar
I FCT Clice from Crop pu fonw-111ce oil So I
vc Fy s I'm I Li �ivs; c;, I a n d c I I c: 11 1c.1
Fen tire s
Apl)Jicallort iatcs f1:11I()gc;i shnJ1 noi
L
CNCCCd the 31110U.M 0-CICITTIMUl [1�1 I�W
JZ - Y 1-7. c oil C c p I - A np i i ca 1! o n T:! (es fo , a I I
oillier 1111tTictlLs !(): C�.Cccd tile aillolint
;-ccowmendcd in a soll ms( icport or any
pprovcd source C)�;, ifils ill forill �3 11 on for- .1 fly
['aill'ICTI( lai-�elcd as pJ2nning prionly,
C re R1, C 5 1 t Ug I i mis rc �. so I'J i e s t r i
�vould not make a -cco;1IrlleqcJaI1i)rl 0),-jsc(1
011 Ccollornic rcturn. i.e., a �oij Ic-sl ITICIC,% of
-5 1 ), b u I: an en N, I ro nin-i e ri ta I p ro h I c ill Nvo tj I d
'lot result until the Hidex reached 200.
Vicre animal wasLe I's Involved, this
s I tu a tio r� rn ay be con -I mo n. Ev c n Nvii cre
additional response is not expected, it
should be feasible 10 �dd aMOLIT'ItS Which
will be removed in tile 13an,csied crop
without significant degradat'lon of tile
environment,
9. Choose a fertilization T-ate �vithin
recommended ranges Illat considers local
water quality needs.
10. A] I n i trog en ra tes for h ay prod u c (ion are fo r
purr grass stands. Reduce all hay crop
nitrogen rates by 25 percent when grazing.
For each ton of hay harvested from a
pasture system the nitrogen application rate
may be returned to the R.Y.E. application
rate for hay.
I I - Important considerations for n utrien t
application include amount, source,
placemerit, and timing. Plant nutrients may
be applied as -broadcast, starter, surface
band or injected band applications. Any one
method may have ]Its advantages under a
given set of plant nutrient demands, soi[
characteris tics, an d ferit I izer so urce.
12. Section I-B of the Technical Guide,
leaching index maps, demonstrates the
comparative leaching potential ofsoils of
�\-Iorlh C.1follml T)ICSC
the gli tile] tfics, (()I ;I�scsslnjl 11111jJ(' (IN03)
Jenching ri�J� Whi lecOmplendcd
'FCC11111cal (Midc,
along wilh Soils 111forni:11101 I . 6;- 01C Cid, m
IdC1111'r), [lie polcillini for nit,-oijoil Juss.
'111C rate of 1111r1ricatioll Norill
C111011.1111 501[s �s Cm ICIV r3PI(I, 1he
lCacil'i 1) r 11�1 I, S c I !I
l"Ibifity of
.1 ,a I tj)C
dechile, and the COSI Of - r)[I.*e :11[1:1[(;
:"murces very high. V"-ft"c' �lluh le�!Chlnt:
rates exist, imd where - Or
1he Crop In qLICSI-Ion, mtroeeii tise
efficiency and c,)vlrolll1cq [.,,I safeiv can
be enhanccd by using sj)1H Lipj)JiC1JJC)JJs.
b. On soils-ofinterl-nedlaie JC2CJJ
potential, split and side 6jess nitrogen
applications are highly recommended
for bcst efficiency.
c. For soils with a leaching Index (LI) of 2
or less, there is lit-tJe concem for nitTatc
leaching losses.
J. Erosion control and water mariagerrient
practices shall be included to minimize
Sol] los's t17anSpOrt and runoff which may
carry attached and dissolved nutrients to
surfac�t waters, Th s is of particular
import.-mce where soils contain high
levels of phosphorous. Incorporating
nutrients into the soi) gencrally reduces
the chance of loss in runoff In the
dissolved form.
13 - Nutrients for a spring -planted crop slial I not
be applied in fall or winter. Nutrients shall
not be app I ied more than 30 days prior to
planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
14. Eq u ipment sha I I be c a I i brated to apply
recommended rates on the field, Special
Precautions must be taken to avoid well
contamination when Using fertigation.
NRC"�, NC

0
j
Tllc cf ops sjlo%� :- ill J'able I aic Ific iypicj I rccomp�-,-tldcd crnps kli WISIL' W I i rZ�� ( 1011 i)L11 IS ilol 'W
inc usivc I i S1. �11-zslc Tray lit applied 1() ollic-1 Cf Ops ha��cd oil thc mil ngcn 1 ccorlimclidatioll fol R V I'
shov,-fl ill NC Coo , riclailve F-mension Scrvice Crop Pio(hicilon Guides, Oic NRCS A��ricijlltjie
IN I a f mll C 7 TIC! :I I F- - , C � (-? . j if ic of i it c N C A L, F I C L J I It J F t, C h , n i I c a is M Li I i u a I.
T;lhle I , i'�i� ro ell (E) rerlikz;lli IL11 Rates bV cyol) Vield
A r:111Lc I's 511c) fn I tN1 Cc 11111 7�a (i oll I n I C S 1) C —111 se ti 1) �a k c is depc 11 d C! 111 () n 1 C a vo 11,11) 1 c %k'?. Ic l
110 � d I I i g c a ra C I V., I -f of the Sod AWHC i's de(ei-i-nined bv 1he sol-i's It.,xiii1c, pc�c,,� 1
on., lilt-, Cj1,L!I--, 5asud U�1011 lh�-. �oij's I C." I L�.
Oil"Pilic 17111n',�,[ loolim, f) fl-
i . 1) It C f c it I a bi j I 1v p! od Lj c C, I he occml clic", C.) r it ccc coliscl-vi I I oil P1 :lc � 1C L, S 10
b;ISC, 21)d ih., 1,,.1r.`uscCs his�oncal c-op procuctl();)
1 LLLLMOFT RC-0)1IIlTlend:iiioji
1.7 - 2,4 lbs- Nil)-.j-
I . A. - 1.6 lbs- N/1)LL
Oa ts
).0 - 1 3 1 bs. N/bu�
Rye'
1.7 - 2.4 Ills. iNllbu.
1.4 - 1.6 lbs. N/bu.
1,0- 1.25 )bs. N/bu,
C0111-silage
10- 12 lbs. 1�,T/ton
SOTghUTT]-gr21n
2,0 - 2.5 lbs ' N,'c %vi.
Soybeans'
3-5 - 4 lbs. INT/bti,
Cotton,
0.06 - 0.12 1b, NN/lb, lint
Tobacco -Burley - See current year Burley Tobacco Information Guide available [Tom North Caroll.1a
Cooperative Exte-sion Service.
Tobacco - Flue-c,--red - See cur -rent year Tobacco 1-riformancin Guide available frorn the Nord)
Carolina Cooper�'Elve Extension Service.
Sorghurn-Sudangass
45 - 55 lbs. N/ton hay
Sudan grass
45 - 55 lbs. N/ton hay
Pearl Miliet
45 - 55 lbs. N/ton hay
3errnudagrass (a)l areas of state)'
40 - 50 lbs. N/tori hay
Fall fescue
40 - 50 lbs. Mon hay
)rchardgrass
40 - 50 lbs. N/ton hay
rimooly
40 - 50 lbs. Mon hay
"rabgrass
40-50 lbs. N/ton hay
-astem Garinagrass
4 0 — 50 lbs - N/ton hay
�escuegrass
40 — 50 lbs. N/ton hay
:rnall grain
50 - 60 lbs. N/ton hay
Witchg-rass,
See footnote I '
line Trees
lardwood Trees
40 - 60 lbs. ac/yr
70-100 lbs. ac/yr
10TE: Reduce all hay crop nitrogen rafes by 25 perceril When gTazing. For c--ch ton of hay harvested from a
pasru-re system the nitrogen application may be returned to the RYU (N) application rate for hay.
When %vas tc is to be appi icd to soybeans, it shoul d be accc mplish ed at prepi ani. or planti n g. Th e crops en tire n i trogen
needs should be met with this application
N rates in cxccss of 120 pounds per acre are scl do rn ju sti ficd for wh vai, barley, oa E. rye. I ri i ica I e. and cotton. Do not
apply more than 100 pounds o F N wh c n overse-cldii ng srna 11 gro in or RycgTa5s in to 8 erm uda gTass,
The total Nitrogen application shall not exceed 120 lbs. Per acre per year.
NRCS. ".'(7
JUNI:
.. 1998

("() 'N"s I DE' RIVY I ONS
Tjl;S practice c;ui icdoc", [!
w IjkcII)iood
Ihat IPPjICd fllllllrnl� -o"fid poliole
S I j I facc or gTOUnd WOC! 11Y III I -j It I I I g 0 1 C
�Ifllouyv apphed Io Only !"I"ll necdc(l,
EVaILl,'flC tile VIIIJIC�;J)l III,,, oi,
st:n�;Ilvc arld
'Decil S:lc�,scd by [he
sence of �Ijl avcr of 1)1,1111
mOncn1s,
G oo d I I I I h c n h a ri C C S %"�'! I f'7 1; 1 i-i I tra i 10 n I
ihus reducing nutricni icmoval illrouch
Sold crOsion. Also soil %vatcr 'is
lICCCSSat-Y for CffCiC17( M-EricIll use,
Consen,alion pracilces 0),91 manage plant
icsidues should be consldcied, 1'.C.:
Resldue,1�4-anagerncrli: Nio-1111 (329)
Residue Managcniciii, Seasonal (344)
Co%,cr and CiTecri Maritire Crop (340)
Critical Area Planting (342)
Smipciropping (585 and 586)
Coyer crops can be Lised as scavengers to
take up excess plant JlUtTiCTIIIS applied 'in
tile previous season to prevent their
movement out of the root zone. Very little
of the scavenged nutTients are available to
the fo I I owing crop, (usua I ly < 15 % o f the N
taken up). They should be harvested for
maximum benefit.
Organic wastes can provide an important
source of nutrients. State and local
regulations, the NRCS Agriculture Waste
Management Field Handbook, North
Carolina Cooperative Exterision Ser-vice
(NCCES) Crop Production Guides, Nor-th
Carolina State University (NCSLD
AgTicultural Chemical Manual, soil test
and waste analysis reports will provide
guidance concerning waste utilization.
Sources of plant nutrients may include
residual amounts in the soil, crop residues
including legumes, waste products, and
commercial fertilizer. Commercial
j''[ I Z(.' IS 11 C I �)()Se [) I ()d I )C I L; %%I � Ill jj
6 1"01;1�,C J)I�MIS beML! USCd 1'01 I1Ir0,gC1F1
up":1kc should bc sciccled based on their
D(lapralion In 01C snl� Naills 11ol acapled
I 'J I hi
Io P. s le wl L ,-c a 0iori Ilfe zrid
PlAlW211101E ;1 VWWOWS slalld 'Allij be
d i Fi i C LJ
Pl�!nl tissue S'an'.pies SlIould he 1:11"Cli to
C V il j U ( e 11 U Irl C! it ,� I al Ij 5 D 11 (1 t o s 1) ppo 1-1 1 h c
;lced foi- -Iddi.,Iwial nuiricill -'pp] ica ti oils.
Excessive concentraiions of one or more
f] LIO I (!n tS. F71 �-1)1 induce deficiencies. So I I
P14'should bc!'[1191111'ailled In theoptirrium,
range for cach crop io irnprcwc
a %,a I la bi I i ty of sai I and appl ied nu tr�cn I s
and to m in imize the release of poten �ial ly
toxic clements,
C Factors from RUSLE can be more
effective in controlling water runoff than
LS and P Factors, C Factors effect root
distTibLi6on, soil temperature and a host
of other variables. Numerically low C
Factors buffer yields from climatic
variations most likely by improving
moisrare status in the soiL The same C
Factors can increase the likelihood of
leaching losses. Consider the
environmental impact fTom increased
leaching.
10. Consider waste storage and treatment
needs to meet application timing as we] I
as land area requi�remcnts for proper waste
utilization.
Water table management through
controlled drainage reduces the movement
of nutrients by reducing total outflow
from a managed area and it also promotes
cicnitification.
,qlz(:S, NC
jum-, Ms
P—, �1

59o, �
J 2 R11),_11-12P IWCICI�; aic vc;ry effectivc in
1191)1)1119
SP-Caill 11111d SV.d1:11CW. buf 1,,ILJCII �Css
rfrc-�Ilve -,I] rutio'FirOf Solubie
Phosplioru� Flilt" strips and f.,,rasscd
Waler-w,-JN's hille t", fe(ent,
I toll
cap3cjtN'_ (;.:lSSCjf do 1,111C J()
i
rCOLICC �,,nd scdijne,­,i6 iosi fioni
Ficids. 13��Sed oil OTC riost ll.kely pollu(nill
SOLJTCCS FL)j ;�, 511c, C()fjSj(jCj Specific
j)r3c1lCc5 t"flicil aic rnos[ to reduce
offsile movcment o, 1hose polluiants.
1 1). Loss of niii-op I -oil, tile so] I is
,cn ('
dependent upon chm.-ite, sod� and
fertilizer application program. Nor -malty,
wi(h adequate sol) wolstulFe, nitrbaen loss
potential c2n b- rt.duiced by applying
nitroven fcrillizer close to the time of
greatest crop demafld� Split applications
may he needed to accomplish this,
Animonium forms arc taken up by plants
in significant amounts as niLTate %vithin
days after application for most crops.
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Establish realistic Yield goals based on soil
map 14171its and the Soli Interpretation
Records, Or historical Yield data, or compute
by crop and soil combination the mean yield
of the Uvee highest yields of the last five
consecutive crops.
2. Develop a nutrient management plan for the
crops to be grown. Account for the residual
amount of nutrients in the soil and crop
residue, including legumes add estimated
nutrients ftorn anticipated organic waste
applicall'ons, and then determine the amount
of fetillizer needed to meet the nuHcnt
needs of the proposed crop and target yield.
Specify the crop, crop rotation, and kind,
source, application time and amount of plant
nutrients that will be used to meet the crop
fertility needs. Identify the priority nutrient
or nutiients.
If non -farm organic waste is to be used, it
sha�l be analyzed for content and applied as
plesclibcd -.I,.. fedcf"Ij, or loc..l
I C I! L 113 f I0 P!j (JoCjjjjjejjt�j(,�)�j ()�
N171CAWIS ;T:)hC.d shoidd be Illaminuit"d,
soll 1C.Si, VV:iSfC .111111vsjs� aild
�csi. S11.111 be sj)cciFicd:mrJ
C()RFOFIil �0:11 011s sl�mdard.
Cri,di;
[J5C 111deN "OF SO�Ld.)JC
Nutriews'' - pFc)ccd,,jjc 01 t)tileT dcj�j,]cd
�ul 11-0.111 )I-iild grant universities (o
12TOMT)dWatCr pollul 'ai i
loll potclill M
Conjunct! I Of! "\10) 111C "!alff bludget for �he
iocalion.
Ali specific-n-lons. will be Consistent %viti)
state 2-nd local regulations.
Is, A nut-n.ew budget will be developed that
shOWs sourcUs (soil residual, crop residues,
organic waste, chemical fertilizer, and
legume crops) and rcquired amouni(s) of
nut-rient(s) for the crop to be grown, Use
[lie Nutrient Budget Workshect (Exhibit
590-1 & 2) 10 document recommendations,
Indicate the Priority planning nutrient(s) on
the workshect. The workshect shall show
the form of fertilizer to be used and the
application rates and method shall be
specified,
Nutrient application rates other than
nitrogen on agricultural land shall be based
on soil test and waste analysis,' consistent
with the NCDA or NCSU
recommendations.
10, Nitrogen rates should be based on realistic
crop yield expectations and shall consider
all sources of nutrients that may be
,availablr as outlined in the attached nutrient
budget workshret,
[I. The following items should be included.
1110se items marked with an asterisk shall
be re corded as minimum documcnitallio'n
requIrCments.
# a Location
NRCS' NC
Itliql" 1998

1) in acres
C M I I i I C 711 1) Lid j; c-, sh c e i
d Sotlice of
a:id
S IJ Mn con,
c -ros '-, n
1--quipmcf)( opernl�orl. �Illd
111:11I)tC11,911ce
S
_NK
kcccivinp waic.-cofly (J)1-
1) V�` Q S Lre a it I "s i J-1 C a I I oll I I I (i C
NLJIIIhC,
0 F Oth C-, j c n t 1.N, I F1 f'
110 � YI C 11 c 1,9 11ir C),
When animal waste is unlized as
a numunt souTcc 96heie (o plans
and ST)CCII-Icat-lons In Staild"Ird
633.
OiTRATION ANT) jNI-AIN1TNA--N'CI'
1, Sj)ccl-.3J pieciulions must be taken to avold
weil contarninanon when using Iciligailon.
2. Equipmcn( sliould be cleared after nuLHent
application. Waste water resulting fr-om
flushing applicaflon equipment should be
kept away from wells, streams, ponds,
lakes, or other water bodies and out of high
nwoff areas. Follow all state and local
regulations concerr�ing storage ofrriaterials
and disposal of product containers.
3. Avoid unnecessary exposure to hazardous
chc rn I ca I fe rti I i zer an d organ�c wastes,
PrOICC�IVC CIOI�Mlf,, � ' ! C) ' .1
TCS 1); T -11 () f , g I o vc s a n Oo lNvc I I . -�i �I:J(J hc
�volll 'Olcll polcrjll"111�'
rialif-'C'oll� ll)oicrl�lls
4. Di sp. ose o F produci caii 12 1 n crs W,
-ICc()"(;�')Icc "'Ith local
loc:ti' sl�;-�: .!",j
fcdc'�"!I ; C-golil I lolls
Of fCI-Ill!ZCTS. In CZISC OC 311
-�ejllli7,cr rill 91 1 -n)c
will r1wify Ilic County l--wc-gcnc,,-
Mag?.gemcni Coordinwor 11'. `110;i
i L fV
111C SLLI:C ENlcrgency fMan;If-ICTnCf-Li
Coordlri�ior,
I�efcr to Standard 633 for operaboi- and
Ynainicnance of an apprm,ed ariirn�! %vasic
Utl'11'72[1011 I)Ian.
RF, I �'J �, RE NTCES
Sol] Facts, Nutrient Content of Fertilizers and
Organic Materials. The Nortli Carolina
Coopc�rativc Extension Service, 6191,
Soil Facts, Nuti�cnt Removal by Crops in North
Carolina, The North Carolina Cooperative
Extension Service, 3191.
I
Nkcs. %C
11INF, 199F

Field
illc!")arcd bv:
DoI111,11,1111 S�)11 rvnc.
soll Loss
Previ011s CFOTY
Planned Crop:
K SI
I'I "IC ( "Y" A ci e s,
Sod Loss:__
yleidl-
Rcajisw y1ck-I
Pal:__
Crop \Nacds
Circle Prionry Nut:1,C111(s) Nf P205 1' 2 0
P- I E96 i b S P, 0,) (K - I x 4. 176 = I bs K,O)
Sold test levels III Ibs per 21cre
NutFients required for yield goaf/ac
I - Sol] Test Reconiniendations
fTom NICDA report or
A
2. Recornmendation h7cm NCSU
Crop Production Guide or NC
Agr. Chemical Manual
B
Nutrient Credits
Legume -credit n/a
n/a C
A-nimal and organic waste
Rate Type 2/
D
Total Credits
E
L Nutrient Dzilance
Nutrient needs (qr surp us) for crop yield
F = A or B — E F
Animal Waste
A.nirnal waste -nutrient content
(k�ind) 2' Ibs per ton or lbsper 1000 gai
ethod of Application)
NRCS. NC
PJKF , 1998

Addilloll.d D-ocullicX-lilion Dur' Ip JII:,njww
Sollicc oFnddii�oll�fl 111111-jelits Ficcdcd
T] 111C C) F CII., ippi1c"I � f () F)
I I � V CII;., S S I ry 111 g 0 rpaji ];?.,i I I () 11
Refer (C) V"F-S�e t-,11liz:i(Ion S(,-wd-,u-d (63--,) or Sel-[Ion X in -Nlcrth AI,-,T--�CIjjIIjrIj clicnilcal
N4--1111131 for jI'VC5:0C).- TIMMUC ;)F-0dUCII0jI -FtCS LId IMIFICIII C011tCTIi i'M- or
[FIC0TP0Y21e0 JI'I---,'ajj2blC, USC V.'aS-�C IM!j�'SJS rCpon from IqCDA.
V,71icii oi �- L 1 1 s ,r.. ed I uni or hi gh you slic tj j d coi-ii ider a] ienial 1 ves LI)a t v.- ii i r-ed tice Elie po I cn I I a I Fo I
Jeaching of soluble fluplents,'Collsider Ilming, o�fe!ilhzcr applicnon, s-)Ilt app�icilions, and
alternauve crops 'Lliat'require less nutlien[E.
Leachinp, Po(e;inal (111cl,11i, Medium: Low) - Caii be Cound in Secil'on i-D of die Field Office
Technical Gul�e.
T)�)e of Waste - Broiler litter, Hog La-ooii, Dalry Slurry, etc,
No( aIJ ritit-r-ients frorri previously applied aninial wastes are usc6 each growing season. For a
Zoreat par-L mirieradlZat= rates depend on so'] properties a -rid chi-nate. Remain'
D I I ing nutrients
fTom p6or appi ]cations of animal wastes can be determ ined fro ri chapter 11, table 11 -6 1 n the
Nat-ura i R eso u rces Conserva t I o n S er-vi c e's A M-'cu I tura I Waste M an ag em erit 1-1 el d Man u a 1.
Nitrogen ETom legume cover crops such as hairy vetch or leg -Lune crc�ps such as soybeans or
peanuts gTown the prvvious ),car. Ma-ke a choice from the range offered considering the vigor
o r di e I egurn e c rop, el ap s ed ti nic fro m h arves t or burud o wn, an d �ae I e acl� n 2 p oten ti al 0 f the
r iduai ru'tro-en based on die season md soil characteristics.
Crops
Hairy Vetch 8 0- 100 1 b s/acre
Crimson Clover 60-75 lbs/acre
Previous Year's Cro
Soybeans 15-30 Ibs/acre
i
Peanuts 20-40 lbs/acre
Clover or Alfalfa Sod 80-100 lbs/acre
NRCS. NC
A.M., 1998

I ' LIN I r: r
a r I 11 1 �-- r i I ci
r-, oj 16 q o cil A q r Ic i i f I u r 6 uii 1 1 . 11 c S c i � i i c
('."r�PUD Hox 16 '� 0
n �� vp�' 1 4. i4c 2 7 61� _"- 76 � 0
pi 9 15 �tA 7
.� 1, 9 15 7 9 IJIJ (I
F ft
Vlemorandum
TO: Norih Carolins, Conifled Tec�,.nical Sp(-,�clllisls
R3 0 fo: NIC Slatp Unlvp�siiy Forage Production %Morkgroup
D ATE: July 13, 1993
SUBJE-Cl-.. Crop Management RrLclice�) [or Select Forages
Used in Waste Management
TliE fbllo�ving is a four -page sijmrna-r�- of su,-,gesuons for n1irl2ger-rieril practices for sonit�
C�
forage crops that caj) be US("d in A,astc rnana2crnont plans. These suggc5tlorLs are a result of
d 1,,.c u ss io ris v.- Ithin the NC S i ate Unlvcrs it Y Forage Prod uci ion Work grou pj a group oornpriscd
ofNC St ate faculty and NRCS agenc�, personnel with exptmise with the crops,
There axe Limited docurnanicd research respows of soine of thrse PTRCtiCCS on the many soils
and environments where these crops are currently being grOWD. The Forage Production
WorkgToup has taken the available data and used the combincd experiences and realistic
es(in-Lates of key people to come up Nvith StlggeSLIons that will allow farrne�rs to incorporate
these' crops and praCLiceS into waste manageintril plans. AS data becorne available to
substantiate or refure these suggestions, ibe Forage Production Workgroup will make
appropriate changes.
Berm uda 0 verse eded With Cerea I R),e and A n nual Ryegrass
Curreally two types of "ryegrass" are being used for winter over -seeding in rields used for
artim-al waste rmnagement. C�L �al �, is a winter annual smallgrain that looks similar to
wheat, barley and oats. mmiaLryeim-s� is a winter annual grass that looks much like tall
fescue. Both of' these grasses, when growing duri�rtg Lhft winter on bermda sod, can have
significant impact on subsequent bermuda Vields. In effect, the total yields from an acre
gTowing the combination of bermuda with these winter mivals w1L1 usually ),icld between 1-2
tons m,ore per acre than bermuda growing alone for ilin year. 'rherefore, the total arnotint of
PAN /a cre for t lie ycar is about 100 1 bs more th an for bex=63 alo n e - A 11 houg h cereal rye and
annual r-yegrass are suitable crops for overseeding, the maiiagment of tht crops are different
and thu s pract ice s Imple niented are depende n L o ri t lie crop selected.
—MA

,. 1'. , '. , . Scii�nt-t,
-I! ". , 111 � - r' . . " . , 11 � ! - - - I )..,I itj ri i i i i i o i I i
vn!. f m - ola � 1;.jlr 11 L�l D V , .11,
I-'- r 'r I j, o � 0� (jrr'j1'k;j
c cFu L)o a fi! r J,: Lmi if,, ri ri fj i #� Sc I or f
C all, r �i I � R " � - ",I
5 .,? - Q 4 1 N 7 C �j L, b
zip �'5 2f"'
fj I ti '.� I i� 7 �1;� �1 ( T � 1 )
")Vq 11 Th('. 1-Il0M CCJ11�1�ticlll Q�Iilds 41-C ]TV)PI LfillIllIg T_VC III(,) stl(�] 01an 3
I all) �c,d 11 Jj I I ) i I 127 1 N L? I C. JJC NL.CdS ITf? bo c r i s � i c, r i
bt: T rri u d i so d f �� I I o w 1) cultiv�jnon A-0 di.�­ ui n1l3ge irnplenm­�
1'()I' 1)I'0adCaSI PlinlifIg 0; SCLAS should II-x-, 1.3 lilt-, 13((� for drilik-d Scud-, The J�Ist
loll of LInimal wzi"W is io b_- aP!11-)1cd It) ii-it, lm'Tfluda priol !'n n
,I.F) 1) 11 C A I 10 F1 0 f 5 () I bS/K I L! _J 1) 1 N Tl I Av:ij I a b 1,,: N ( 11 A IN) b t' app I i C d IX Ivec 11 S c J) I C in b,,,- 1 15
aj I d 0 c 10 he r 3, 0, A n a d cl i i �Lo j in 1 5 0 1 b s /a C i e 0 f 1) ni Li he- B 1) p I i e d in Fc b i u ary- t�.-1 � r c. I t. i I' r ye
to rc) wi h is harvesied On I I'nlL' d Ild do�,_s �ioi s I,, n j Fic wit I s Iii-ide I he berinuda, J r Elt fLor t he
s i I b s c, -muda crop are bast.d on rua1suc )Jelds of herrTaIda. A hal'veSl is required priol"
quc�m bei
lo licading or April 7, which evei, comes firsi. 'rlj I ji ncccssary to rTijn irnize (lie poiential 1'01.
,�Iiadfflg bermuda and rcducing Its yields. The PAN raw for grazed sys�erns with berrTlUda
0 N4 e rseeded with cercal rye rijust be icduced in accordance iivith NIRCS Techn�cal
Standard #590L
Anoual Ryegmss
A ti nu al rye gras s s h 0 uld he p lanted by 0 c I o ber 15 1 o pro vide the bes t oppon u n it y i o ge i win t. e r
growth. The most corlsisicrit smds are obtained frorn drilling ryegrass into short (less than 3
inchts tall) ben-nudagrass sod. II'drilling is not possible, the seeds mav be broadcast on short
bermuda sod followed by a light CulLiVation with a disc or tillage Jimplement. The sezding rate
for broadcast planting of see& should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds, The last
appl-ication of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda prior to August 31. Art
application of 50 lbs/acre of (PAN) rmy be applied between September 15 and October 30.
An additional 50 lbs/acre of PAN rnay be applied in February -March. If addittonal PAN is
applied to the ryegr8ss in April -May, the PAN rate for the bermuda must be iedaced by a
corresponding a=unt. Th� is necessary because ryegrass g�rowih during April -May wil-I
reduce bermuda -yields ' and shorten Lhj-- ti bermuda can fully milize the N. A harvesL is
required by heading or April 7, which ever comes flirst to pravom shading of ernerging
bermuda during April -May period, To favor the production of thn bermuda, additional
harvests of ryegrass will be required when tht ryegrass canopy reaches 12 to 15 inches heighi.
The PAN rate for gTazed systems with bermuda overseeded with annual ryegrass must be
reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical Standard #590.

d r I tj I I r .:1, M-T ul
01 j INU or N'."Ll.
Culogo Aur cu':Ur�� al. -. .
C 11 r r i I , L) �i () 1 71""'
n. I . � i -d J . uC �, 7 t �- --. ',' i - ' .1 ,
9 11.4 S I S 2 tA I
') I U " 15 7qsq it L
Fa_�ferll Garnus�rnss
I I I '<- C I rl t I CrI cl� III,, j j W C VL� ]'� I I 1 -1 L I LJ Fi t -I t-- r Ll J t d P, HQM-11) �:Ll AC I I f I I
h C L: S-C d
I . C)lq snr�.� 1,L)IIS 1113L :!�C. dral,T) 01 ('XC:C�S�VJV J
v I C" I d � Im I I ii r I C) IV hI I d Fj `171 U d r.-, s �, at s i ni I r r 0 1 r, s
2, On hv.aN­,' texLij.-cd solls [!lilt Lze pj�)Fjy 10 �Jfalj-jed, L1ajIIj11rjjSS 1112N
1 _5_3 ljrn,-s more thiin li0nd bermuda
Claniagrass csiabhsht�s s1dwly and ,k,ill not usua-ily produce Inuch harvestable lbrage clurlll�
111C estAflishiller)t I'L is -o aflow ihL� arovih dui'lnc�, ihL, sv',edli
rn Ing yCilf 10 aCCURIUlak!
for Most nj- all scason; 11' i[ is it) L�2 halvt�sled' It Should be donc� after JW1 sccdhead foi-iiiatio.-i
On a rria]crily of the plants. Therelori�, PAN fOr the sc�cd�no year should b(-- modified
accardilloly. Ovel'seeding galTiligrass with wintei 21IMMIS i� TIM CWTeTILIV advised bvcause th��
hal VC S I I nj! 0 r c'IU7 j n g niz n a ge man i o f t I ic w in i L� I- ann u a I c ro p s d u ri-n g Fit br U ary- A p I- I I w,', U 1d, b._r
detn'mcntal to the survival of gainagrass. Garnaurass should riot normally be harvested or
gra-zed below 6-9 triclics stubble.
Application rates are to be based on the re"stic N rates that address the N needs per lon of
h.ay, a realistic yield and an appropriaw application window, When harvested as hay in ihe 24-
36 �ncfi stage ol'growth, the N rate ranges frorn 40-50 IbS/LOn of dq matter. The PAN rate for
grazed systems must be mduced in accordance with NRCS Technical Standard #590.
The application wiridow for gamagrass is slightly earlier than for bermuda; gamuass slarts
D
growing about 3-4 weeks earLier than CoasLal bermudagrass and about 2-3 wwks eaflier iha-n
Tifton 44. Gamgrass is domiant from frost to March. The last application of PAN in the
su m.=r s hould be PTiO r to Au gust 3 1.
Rescuegrass (i.e. Mama)
Rescuegrass is a cool season grass and makes Most Of its gTONYTh JFTCHI March-Jurie and
September -November, It should raceive most of its N during the September -October and late
February through May mnihs. Lin-lited data are availabic for realistic yields of rescuegrass
I H we
on varous soils and at various IN levels in Norlb CaroLina. o wer, un[i) further data is
collected thr- following suggestions may be useful.
1. On sandy, well dirainud to cxcessively drained soils, rescuegrass may yield 1.5- 3 times
fescue, assunillig a uniform and dense stand 01'grass is prestal.

a
3
j r
r r , , ! , r , :-". I I , L '� - , , t c. , ', , " , I I - L
r. vd'J I I L41 1 .1 1 , d �,,: I , -.7 r I r. P
Pr�r. . w. m � t i i � J , , r V , ',: 6 f t 1 - ,
(�,Iprlplj-q 110, /k, Q
i i :j i i, i w t i. N C 2 7 t I 1� - ' 6 ' C,
7 �� s P
di �jl I C L- C U C f-�l Y
n wt I � pt
'01 Lidilpl(qi vivlds of F("SC
1 lit
I n 1 L
111-j fl I L j
-J
The, abovl� a�sulllc- 1,d ljlj.L)L��dl fu](111L
rincs Iml fllillfw'�Ilj de, fl�c.
AH101jiltl ICSCLW�,r-rjs,� is
under this jjj;Ana!1cIfI�jl[ it JS 1'1:01V 0):'�
N,Car
diSejV_ Will �11 JCC] LUJC� 01' 11101-C j2rc)%vfhs in sorTY- yea"S.
jj the realistic I\i 1,,ites (Ila, aciciF,ess 0jr N ne-eds per ton of
Applicall0ri 1'ales -are to bu bascd C -c Y,
re"111sw vield al -Id an Jppj.opl�ate app)'catiun window. Whcn ' 11,jf� - -sled as Ild
jesc�le, r,allgitin 1yom 40-50 lbs/1011,
rate is Sinlijar to ottjrr c(.)oj season gr�jssts Such as �'7
Rt� -ilso conii June-AugLIS1 if m0wure is 2vali2ble- DIII-Ing
,.SL:ucgj-,jss rl-ja�, L, Inue SOM
these Off-Se-2SWIS, rOSC uegrass S1,C),11d not jecelve wore than aijout 25 lbs N11acro/nionth. 0111�
t f I �je 'valent of 1-inch of A,atcr can be appiicd tit llic
apply 25 lbs Nl,)r-rr- iii June-Augus I cqut h w'tkin a 3-5 weO,
sarne time, if the crop does not rcspond with a[ JeaSL 2 1000 lbs Of' gfc%kl 1
period do not make ano[Lwr appEcation UnTil LhL' Plarlts lla`e 11ad [lie opportunity to use the
previOUS appliCaLion.

T
P
p i-P
LA
Ilk,
7
7 4 r
4
W
V- 71
.11, 1p I
ip
1p"
c, I �P
Z �,, PI'-', �, - . - .. :�. � o lt — 4
"bo
.41
_—A V, k j,.`_
_pp
Dz
Ar 4 M. _4p
1p
Oki
i y
:., , - ' `IPP 4
44 1 i-' 41'-
V. 6 j
� . - , o 0'.' - - - A
l Wj
��Ij 14
I T
06 '�'e
qw,. r
IN 41t
5

?I
-1

10 1. &
101�67
101.5,3
101-18
100.97
100-80
100.55
100.48
100.54
iol.60 100.92 100,60 100.59
rld-
100-62
100.80
100.77
700.37
100.88
1162
sllEA
1934
700.87
101.05 BENCHMARK ELEVATION 100.00' (ASSUMED)
TOP OF CONCRETE ON FEED TANK PAD
700.91
700.64
700-95 700.41 107�24' 100,65
3RENT WHIMELD &:A3-5S0C. ffLAG00N GAUGE INSTALLATION FOR: Cf 17196
DA TE.
P,O- BOX 261
EWALLA&, NC 28466 KING FARMS K-4
[phone]

97.62
97� 70
97.48
97-74
98.03
E 98.59
BENCHMARK ELEVATION = 100�00' (ASSUMED)
TOP OF CONCRE-iE ON FEED TANK PAD -08.71
� 7.54 -07-97 9 7-3 7
E3 GAUC�­ EL. = 96.97'
1162
WTE
97.16 7934
97.05
E��
97.07
97.12
97�20
97�21
97.16
97�40
97�46
97,J6
98..3z 98-73 97.81 97-50 97.17
-- E�- 41
BRENT WHITFIELD & ASSOC] LAGOON GAUGE INSTALLATION FOR: DATE: 41171-96
P. 0. BOX 261
EWALLA�CE, NC 28466 KING FARMS K-5
[phone]

� f,
.0
Animal Waste- Man�ge'ment Plan Certification
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
Company
Name
King Farnis
..........................
Of (P
...... .. . .
. . . ...
U.0
General Inf0Tmafion*,
Name of Farm: King Farrits - K4 Facility No: 31-601
Owner(s) Name: Craig King Phone No: 910-285-2692
Mailing Address: 126 Garland King Road Teachey, NC 28464
Farm Location: Fourteen Digit Hydrologic Unit: 03030007070020
Latitude and Longitude: 34a 461 5511 / 77- 57' 40" County: Duplin
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific:
road names, direction s, mi lepost, etc.): ' ON NC I I approx 3/4 infle south of Garland King Road
intersection. I I
Oi)eration 12psedvilow
7�pe of 3 1 vine
No of A n ima Is
() wcan to Feeder
0
0 FeWer to Finish
0
0 Farrow to Wean
0
'dFarrow to Rcdcr
S80
0 Farrow to Finish
0
7�pe of Poutiq No ofAnbiials
01-sycr
Outlets
Other Type of Livestock:
7�pe of Calfle No of Animals
()Dairy
ORcef
Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application: 55 Required Acreage: 20
Number of Lagoons/Storage Ponds: I Total Capacity: 487,980 Cubic Feet (ft,
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: 6 Y or NO (please circle one)
Owner/Manager Agreement
I(we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and maintenance
procedures eshiblished in the approved animal waste mAn4gement plan for the farm named above And will implement these procedures. I (we)
know that any expansion to [tic c4sting design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a
new ccrtificaiion to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Managcment before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from the storage or application systein to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or froni it storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the appfioation of aninial
waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical standards developed by
the Natural Resources Conservation Service, The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil-ana Water
Con servation D istrict. I (wo) kn ow that mad if icatio n m ust be approved by L Wchn !Cal spocij list a nd s u bm itted to the So il an d Water Conservation
D is Lrict p dor to implem en tat io n. A chan ge in land ownership roqu ires written notif ication Ld DEM o r a new certi ficatio n (I f the approved plan is
changed) within 60 days o t a PIC tra "Y",
Name of Land 01. V >�
,,)Craig Kill
Signature: ate:
'e-x4cz� D
Name of Manager (if d4ferent
Signature:
AWC -- April 24. 1996
.41
Date:

Technical Specialist Certification
1. As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Conmiission pursuant to ISA
NCAC 6F .0005, 1 certify that the animal waste nutnagement system for the farm named ab6ve has an animal waste
tnanagament plan that tneets or exceeds statidards and specificatioas of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM) as
specified in 15A NCAC 211.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the North Carolina
Soil and Water Conservation ConuWssion pursuant to ISA NCAC 211.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The folloNVing
element& are includcd in the plan as applicablo. While each category designates a technical specialist who may sign each
certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC,I) the techuical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically competent.
11. Certification of Design
A) _Ct)l ject loll, Slorage,-TralfflClil System
Check the appropriate box
I-A,4stinr facility w'diouLLetrofi (SD or Y.'UP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capaci(y; storage capability consistent with waste utilization requirements.
New, expando or jet[ofitte4l focilify (SD)
Aninul waste storage and tfeaunent structures, such as but not limited to collection system, lagoons and ponds, have
baen designed to meet or exceo [he minimurn standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print) Michael Sugg
Affiliation: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address(Agency): P.O. Box 277 Kenansville, NC 28349-0277 Phone No: 910-296-2121
Signature: Date: July 19, 1996
B)Iand Apphention SiIV JWTJ
no phin provides for minimum separation (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Naine of Teclinical Special6l (Please Print): Michael Sugg
Affiliation- USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address (Agency): P.O. Box 277 Kenansville NC 28349-0277 Phone No: 910-296-2121
Signature: �� "—r - - ;1�1 Date: July 19, 1996
Q Runoff Guntryls frorn Exterior Lo(fi
Check the appropriate box
10 Facilitx without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Facility wi!h-witerior lots (RC)
Mothods to minimize the jun off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use arm have been designed in a=rdance
with technical standards dovoloped by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Michael Sugg
Affiliation: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address (Agency): P.O. Box 277 Kenansville, NC 28349-0277 Phone No.: 910-296-2121
Signatum-M ezv Date: July 19, 1996
AWC — April 24, 1 "6 2

D) A"licalign find Ilaudlin EgUipmellt
Check the Appropriate box
Bxigijig fadlily—with oxisting waste application Wuipment (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in tho plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in accordance
with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste management
plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the
specified hydi-aulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of application has been established; required buffers
can be awintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the plan).
NMM gr gAlloaded faci I ity* gr gx ist ing &qil ity withpUt elisting waste 02plication Nuipmen (1)
Aninul waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
acconunodate the waste management plan; (proposed applicution equipment can cover the area required by the plan at
rates not to exceW, either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications has
been established-, required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of The
plan).
Name of Tedmical Specialist (Please Print): Michael Sugg
Affilia(ion: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address(Agency): PO Box 277 Kenansville NC 28349-0277 Phone No: 910-296-2121
Signature: Date: July 19, 1996
zrl
M
111. Certification of Installation
A) CoIlWion. SloGeg. Trotmeed TItsljlllIkli9D
Now. expanded or Mirofiged facility (ST)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed in
accordance with the approved plan to meet or exGee4 the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilithz without retrofits, no ce4lification is necessary.
Name of Teclialcal Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
AWC — April 24,1996

B) Land 614�166un Si (WUn
Check the appropriate box
17ho cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system as
specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has cominitted to established the
vegetation as specified in [lie plan by (wonthIday/year); the proposed cover crop is appropriate for
compliance with the waste utilization plan.
Also ch=k this box if approprimito
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days of
this certification, the nwnor has commiated to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Plem Print): Michael Sugg
Affiliation: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address(Agency): P.O. Box 277 Keiiansville, NC 28349-0277 Phone No.: 910-296-2121
Signature- Z/ Date: July 19, 1996
ro�
This following signature block is only to he used when the box for conditional approval in III.B above lias been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan, and if
appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion from a
Tee.linical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specifed in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that
failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action
from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manger (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Q Run& CoUtEgIs froM Exterior lAts (RQ
Ea—cility with exterior lot
Mothads to ininiudze the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified in
[be plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certificution is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:'
Address(Agency): Phone -No.:
Signature: Date: -
AWC — April 24, 1996

D) Applicatupa nnd 1hridtigg EqUipineat Instlillation (WUP or 1)
Check the appropriate block
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in ilia plan is on site and ready for use; calibration and
adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner has
proposed leasing or third party application and his provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the contract
agrees with ilia requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained, calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained us part of the plan.
Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has been purchased
and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate storage to
hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with cropping
system contained in the plan-, and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are
contained as part of the plan.
Name of Teclinical Specialist(Please Print): Michael Sugg
Affiliation: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Smice
Address(Agency): PO Box 277 Kenansville NC 28349-0277 Phone No.: 910-296-2121
Signature: �c . Zn( Date: July 19, 1996
(/ if
The following signature block is only to be used when lite box for conditional approval in III D above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purdiase the anivul waste application and handling equipment as specified in my
(our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation from a Technical Specialist
within 15 calendar days following the dide specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this
verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Nalue of lAnd Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Please return the completed fornt to lite Division of Environmental Management at the following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
Witter Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. BOX 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
I'lease also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste Management Plan to lite
local Sail and'Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in your riles with your Animal Waste Management
Plait.
AWC — April 24,1996

Animal Waste Mariagement Plan Certification
(Mase type or print all informadon theit does not require a signature)
0eneral-Informatiom
Name of Farm: King Farnu - K5 Facility No: 31-467
Owner(s) Name: Craig King Phone No: 910-285-2692
Mailing Address: 126 Garland King Road Teachey, NC, 28464
Farin Localion: Fourteen Digit Hydrologic Unit: 03030007070020
Latitude and Longitude: 34* 46' 50" 07a 57' 35" County- Duplin
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific:
road names, directions, milepost, etc.): ON NC 11 approx 3/4 mile south of Garland King Road
intersection.
Operafigil I)escrij)flon;
7ype of Siviije
No tyAnhnals
0 Wean to Fecder
0
R Fe Wer to Fini4h
1280
0 Farrow to Wean
0
0 Farrow to Feeder
0
0 Farrow to Finitih
0
4pe of Poultry No of Anhnals
()Layer
()Pullcta
Odicr Type of Livestock;
7�pe of Cattle No of An bitals
()Dairy
()Beef
Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application: 55 Required Acreage: 16.4
Number of Lagoons/Storage Ponds: I Total Capacity: 287,083 Cubic Feet (W
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: or NO (please circle one)
Owner/Manager Agreement
Rwe) verify that ail the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and maintenance
procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement these procedures. I (we)
know that arty expansion to the exixting design capaci(y of tho waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a
ncw cc�tification to be submitted to lite Division of Environmental Managcuriont before the now animals am stocked. I (we) understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from the storitgo or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or froar a storm event less severe than the 25-ycar. 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal
waste. J (we) understand that rua-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical standards developed by
the Natural Resourm Consmation Service. 'Me approved Plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the "I Soil-axid Water
Conservation District. I (we) know that modification must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation
District prior to impic4nentation. A change in land ownership roquirca written notification t6 DEM or a now certification (if the approved plan is
changed) within 60 days of a title tranif".
Name of I -and Own—v V.
'jCraig King
Signature: ao�— A, —
Name of Manager (if different frojE owner);
Date:__�x / �- �?z
-)FTI."t
m
Signature:
AWC -- April 24, 1996
Date:

Technical Specialist Ceetification
1. As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation CQmmission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F ODGS, I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM) as
specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA-Nalurul Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the North Carolina
Soil and Water Conservation Commiission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F OWI-.0005. 'Me following
elements ate included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may sign each
certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC,I) the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically competent.
11. Certification of Design
A) Collection, Stora", Treaftnt Sysigm
Check the appropricae bax
Exisline fgcilily without retfofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization requirements.
New, expandZ! or ret rojrtW -fiweil i IX (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment souctures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds, have
been designed to meet or exceed the mininium standards and specifications.
Name of Teclinical Specialist (Please Print) Michael Sugg
Affiliation: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address(Agency): P.D. Box 277 Kenansville, NC 28349-0277 Phone No: 910-296-2121
Signature: 10 Date: July 19, 1996
B) Lapd Allpligition Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separation (buffers)-, adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Tectinical Specialist (Please Pr int): Michael Sugg
Affiliation: USDA Natural, Resources Conservation Service
Addfess (Agency): P.O. Box 277 Kenansville NC 28349-0277 Phone No: 910-296-2121
Signature Date: July 19, 1996
QRunoff CoUlMll Lrmorn Extedor Lots
Check ihe appropriate box
F-jLcilily wilhoitt oterior lot (SD or WUP or RQ
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Faci I ily LAA-cxt-erior lots (RC)
Methods to "nimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in accordance
with i�clinical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Teclinical Specialist (Please Print): Michael Sugg
Affiliation; USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address (Agency): P.O. Box 277 Kenansville, NC 28349-0277 Phone No.: 910-296-2121
Signature: - ;P Date. July 19, 1996
AWC — April 24, IW f,// V 2

D) Applioliml and IlAndlivig.Eguipment
Check Me Appropriate box
Existing f&6li1X-w'th ex'sling wasig appliatFon r4011ment ' (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in accordance
with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste management
plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the
specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of application has been established; required buffers
can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance am contained as part of the plan).
Ncw oroxunds4 fecility or existing- facility-without-cxistine w"16 APPI caflon 1guipmen (1)
Animal waste application equipinent specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at
rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of appliWiou has
been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plau).
Nan je of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Michael Sugg
Affiliation: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address(Agency): PO Box 277 Kenansville NC 28349-0277 Phone No: 910-296-2121
Signature: C�z;�r Date: July 19, 1996
"Y
Ill. Certification of Installation
A) ColIgglion. Storan. TCWhIloil. Installufly.
hiew, eximn4oll or rgtrofitted-foei lily (Sl)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installetl in
accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
4--for existing rucilities without reWofits, no certification is necessary.
Naine of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
AWC — April 24,1996

D) Land Application Si1c (WUI')
Check the appropriate box
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the p!�n is cleared for planting; the cropping system as
specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to established the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is appropriate for
compliance with the waste utilization plan.
Also check this Wx if appropriatr
if the cropping system as specified in die plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days of
this certification. the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Michael Sugg
Affiliation: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address(Agency): P.O. Box 277 Kenansville, NC 28349-0277 Phone No.: 910-296-2121
Signature: Date: July 19, 1996
This following signature block is ellt'o he used when the box for conditional approval in 111.11 above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have coutinitted to establish (lie cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan, and if
appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion from a
Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the dute specifed in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that
failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action
from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: V A4U4- ��� Date:
N . aine of Manger (it differeiW from own4):
Signature: Date:
Q Rp—noff -Cooilrolg fronj Exterior Lo (RC)
E-acilitg with exterior -lots
Methods to n-dnimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specifie4 in
the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necemry.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
AWC — April 24,1996 4

D,, Application Il�d 11andfing EgllipjMefit Iffl(alintoon (W(JP or 1)
Check the appropriate block
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready. for use; calibration and
adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Aninul waste appl"tion and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner has
proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the contract
agrees with (lie requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained. calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has been purchased
and will be on site and installed by (month/day/y=); there is adequate storage to
hold ilia waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can. be land applied in accordance with cropping
system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are
contained as part of the plan.
Naine of Technical Special6t(Please Print): Michael Sugg
Affiliation: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address(Agency): PO Box 277 Kenansville NC 28349-0277 Phone No.: 910-296-2121
Signature: Date: July 19, 1996
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D above has been checked.
I (we) certify flia( I (we) [lave comnlitted to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as specified in my
(our) waste management plan and will subinit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation from a Technical Specialist
within 15 calendar days following the. date specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this
verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Natue of Land Owtin �I'Ieloolfi ki'� I
Siguature: zj�ejv - Date:
4 )�-Lz -�'— / '�- 2'�
Nanie of Manager(if dirreVent frm4owner)-.
Signature: Date:
Please return (lie completed rorm to (Im Division of Envirommen(al Management at the following address:
Department of Envirownent, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. BOX 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Pleam also rprnember to submit 4 copy or this ronn along with the complete Animal Waste Management Plan to the
local Soil and Water Conse"ation Disbict Office and to keep a copy in your riles with your Animal Waste Managernelit.
Plun.
AWC — April 24,1996

� -b*
(W(JP'orI)
Check the appropriate block
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready. for use; calibration and
adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner has
proposed leasiuS or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the contract
agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained. calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has been purchased
and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate storage to
hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can �e land applied in amordance with cropping
system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are
contained as part of [he plan.
Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): Michael Sugg
Affiliation: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address(Agency): PO Box 277 Kenansville NC 28349-0277 Phone No.: 910-296-2121
Signature: - Date: July 19, 1996
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as specified in my
(out) waste management plan and will subni�il to DEM a verification of delivery and installation from a Technical Specialist
within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this
verification is it violation of the waste rimnagement plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner � Y kil� 2
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(if diffef/ent frautlowner):
Signature: Date:
Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Management at the following address:
Deparfinent of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. BOX 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also rpnember to submit a copy of th,is fhnn along with the complete Animal Waste Management Plan to the
"I Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in your files with your Animal Waste Management
Plan.
AWC — April 24,1996

S oii Test
N '27 64W, -(919);-733 2 551�n-�
C 6 N4
Grower. King Farms Copia to.- CouniN Eme
126 Garland King Rd.
Teachey, NC 284649736
Report Fann:
YEARS Duplin County
sion Direaor
Agronomist Comments'. A - 3,$,12
1' d1ftne'Rei
1 ic
tio i
Sample No. Last Crop
GIA Corn, Grain
7,A(MWW
ko Yr TIA
11
Crop or Year Lime N M5 W Mg cu zn B Mn See Note
1st Crop: Corn, Grain 0 120-160 0 0-20 $ 0 0 0 3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC
'BS%
Ac PH P-1 A-]
Ga%
M8%
Mn-JMn-A1(JjMu-A1(2j Zx-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-i
S5-1
NQFNVM-N Na
TMIN 0.66 1.17 4.2
83.0
0.7 5.7 295 79
65.0
9.o
56 55 133
133
48
38
0.1
F1'dd.1nf6jn-";aaa--' W-J
'Lide-
AR 7ji-d2doiie,
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime
N M5 AO
Xg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
GIB Com, Grain
I st Crop: Com, Grain
AT
120-160 0 0
0 2
0
0
3
-7-2
- 2nd Cm:
Test Results
Soia ss HM% WIV CEC
BS%
Ac PH P-1 X-1
Ca%
Mg%
f'Kn-1 Mn-AI (1) Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zh-Af
Cu-1
S-1
SS -I
NQF-NV7�&,v Nd
MIN 0.97 1.11 4.8
81.0
0.9 5.6 218 104
60.0
110
33 37 86
86
21
38
0.1
AopfiidIim�
Sample jV6 Last Crvp Ho
Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime
N M5 Fao
Mg C"
zu
B
MA
see vote
G2A Berm Hay/PasM
Ist Crop. Berm Hay/PasM
-6T
180-220 0 0-20
$ 0
0
0
12
7A Crop:
----------- ---------
Test Results
Sod Class MM% WIV
CEC
BS%
Ac P.H F-1 K-1
CA*
Mg,%
MH-1 Mn-Af (Ij Mn-Al (2) ZA-1
LX-Af CA-1
5-1
554
Nfj�-N M&N
Na
MIN O-L2 1.13
-.3
87.0
0.7 5.9 245 118
68-0
9.0
53 41 174
174 42
35
01
Field' ormationL-i-- :-7&�
Apotied-1
-.9-&6fimen fis
Sample No. Last Crop
Ho
Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime
N M-5 &0
xg Cu Zn
B,
Afn
,v
See O'e
G3A Berm Hay/PasM
1st Crop: Berm Hay/PasM
-9T
180-220 0 0
0 0 0
0
12
2nd Crou:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% w1v
cEC
ffS%
Ac pH P-I K-1
Ca%
Mgl%
Jfn-1,Wn-A1(1)hfn-A1(2) Zn4
Zx-Al Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
VQp-N.,VZ&-N
Na
MIN 1.14 i-n
6-1
82.0
1. 1 6.0 333 173
5TO
-11.0—
35 30 86
86 69
36
01

OWK'��o . n V4 66-,Ri6dy
ik
Sam,We X Last Crop
P?.s-
G4A Berm Ray/Pas,M
Mo
Yr TIA
Crop or Year
I st Cmp: Berm Hay/FasM
Lime
-5T
N P205 AO
180-220 0 10-30
mg cm
0 0
zn
0
8
mu
$
See Note
12
-7A-
2nd Crop:
Test Resul
soil HM% WIV CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn4,Wn-Al(l)Hx-Al(2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
jVQp-NAV&,V Na
MIN 1.14' 1.13
5.1
88-0
0.6 5�9 182 107
6&0 10.0
21 22 38
38
35
41
0.1
fk1d: N&
thdlii-
e une
CuA&4 ons,
Sampie Y& — Last CrOP
Mo
Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime
N A'05 AO
Mg Cm
Zx
B
Mu
See Note
GTIAFSWCom, Gmin
Ist Cfop: Berm Hay/Pas,,M
-6T
180-220 0 2040
$ 0
0
0
12
7�lf 4900
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Sod claw MM% JVIV CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-lMn-Al(l)Mx-Al(2) ZX-1
ZX-Al
Cm -I
S-I
SS-1
NQF-,VA7,,F�-N Na
MIN 0.71 1.13
3.7
81.0
V 5.8 249 99
60.0 7.0
40 33 108
108
51
34
0.1
w1i
e d4am
tions
. ..
..... -77—
Sample,.Vo Last Crop
GT2 Aol- �i— Com, Grain
Ho
Yr TIA
I
or r
Ist Crop: Com, Grain
Lime
-9T
N PIO 5 AO
120-160 0 0-20
cu
$ 2
zm
0
B
mn
0
See 1vole
3
,�2 .3s / /
2nd Crop:
Test Results
sod Rm% W/V CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-lAln-Al(l)Mn-Al(2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
NQp-NA7&,V Na
MIN m4 1-15 3.6
56.0
1.6 5.2 131 83
39.0 6.0
21 30 31
31
23
38
01

-MINCKf! 5: King;
-T6465
Sample No. Last CrOP
Wo Yr TIA
Cmp or Year Linte N P205 AO
Mg c" zn B Mn See Note
rain
1st Crop: Soybeim IT 0 0 0
0 0 0 10 3
2ndCrup:
Test Results
Soa lun w7v CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% Jfn-IMn-AI(I)Mn-AI(2) Zn-I
Zn-AI CU-1 S-I SS-1 NO-N AM-N Na
MIN 3.01- 1.02 11-5 81.0
2.2 5�7 181 230 58.0 13.0 22 23 141
141 38 54 - 0.3

A
Aj 4
Ie
rl 'I
Rm
............. ............
V" y)
r; I T',
iqp,;, *F's j L., —,1;7
J 0/ AO
4
0 lliv
110 -T 1-414rjL' '14 '
At. f -6 1
J,. "J'
p
7., w
!V-0
p
ir Ml ) W I Z.
6 2
47 Z 30
Ir
Ix A
q4
V-j ST Will,"
V4
W. ppp
MW4
p
Ice
yp hjA
b-, 46
;TOF c4
V­ P.5"
0".
"M Ito,
r
- 1
409- 7pl p,
3V
CL!
A
fj
r7.
A.,
'NA
! Sr-
i-,
r1l 7k
Ali
it
..lm. 4L,j
9T
p
F rA
IF - Lip,
)4 +.1 k
H7 J -P
Lk
7
A
'Al.. Ve!
41
MM
1-al. n
10 P .f' 4
'. 7
NO
31461
1, rg'
lF-
-V
3511
p
A.Jlk 'r
6A, ..r
JI
'FOS
f
k4
0o
P
4.;Pl
id

&=wk info.
-iL2bo-moTT ResWtz TI-c-MUM011 znlcss Mottd)
Dhf% A.M P J� cla Af," S I;e
Ain
B A10
cl
Cd
P"
451 110 A4,- 21LO 31.02
0-45
O.q-, 0-3�' T49
W&U9 Cpde.
)VUtrienu A-;-ailzbic for Fi-v Cror IbSf1ODO L2BOM
Other Eicm=U;
IbS1100O.Pagm,
I I AIS
ApAka4M.Ndiod N P205 U 0 Ca Mg S
Fo
hir
zn cu B AM
Cd
'06
De=mog=
2.0 0.71 3M6 0.64 0-26 OM14
o.G'-
T
0-01 T T
Swint L�Mv
PACInfC... labomorvItenflts ��,Dcr MOOD ZWCW
jv P Afg S Fe
Z" B Afo
ci
ci
A
601 66-' 64-4 9,0�0 1-19.8 29.4 Ica
OM20
Waae Code.-
Nuricut; Av2fiabie for Firr, Cror lbs)INKI E!Eons
otbe- Demeaug
rMfl 00(o
tg—oml
ALS
AM6=ixm AWW N P205 X20 Ca Afg S
IT
Aft
in B Mo
Cd
A
Dcs��
krtww 13 OM 5.2 0.5-1 0-17 0.11
0.01
T
7 T
-info:
Sample M.-
DM% N P
r
ce
Afg S 4Fe
Air. Z47
cc B Afo
Cd Pb
-low V'AM--
A-20 A 6S
339
123
51--; ?9.9 2-:7
0�58
0-49
110
WAVe Code.
Nutrients Amftbie for Firr.. Crov
lbs/100* =Dons
!(nbe7EIeMCVT-,c
rwfl000m�?W—
AIS
A*kaim Afetbod X
P.105
X20
Ca Mg S
Fe At" 7x,
cu B Mo
cd Ph
Dcurotiow
I
kr*nxm 1.6
0.63
Z-7
0.72 UO 0-12
0.01 T T
T T
0.91
Swine Lwoou Lia.
Sample Z�
'waste CA4---
AS
DeSaYptiow
Swine L"mn lie
Zz
DM% R 1P
4
.48 56-1
sin �cnthp-�ivp -nnis-4-)
It Cd Mg S fie Ain zn
585 120 �2-11 16A 1-48 Q.34 0.34
B Afo N9 M cd A
o-65 131
FNIU�;cms Arail2bit fOr R-S' GrOD lbs/1006 --ZGnS jOtberEi=CutS IWOMeaUMV
A
,*= - Aidbod
X
P205
XZO
Ca
lrri�ou
1.7
0.75
4.7
0.70
Af I,
S
Fe Mg 7.n cu B Afo
0.19
0.10
"1 7 T
M Cid A

.111111001� - - "I--
M .
ktm
Is
.......... WUALlTY19ECTION
Illis 111111 Ivill be illiplellientef] ill tile event tilat n1liltril Illanure or lig"un effitiellt fluWArg Im
operati all . ia lealdlig, overflo%vilig, or nnmlflg off tile site: Non-0 . ischarga Pe"itUng
Step (1) Stop (lie release or flow of manure/effluent.
Step (2) Assess (lie extent of tile spill and note aliy obvious di-ninges.
Step (3) Contact appropriate personnel and agencies.
Kintj FarMU 910--295"2692
iihone list attached.)
Deplitaleat of Environmental Mallagellient (DEK
!1/0 -
r2ee Land & AFutrient A 4alle7ge"Ir"I
iollfll Owrae:
S- j e?ao.. ---
DRM afler hours emeigency: a,10-7.1_3 942
Local Emergency MIUMBellicilt Systeril: C/o -
Local Natutal Res outce Con servn tion Service:
Local Cooperative Extmsion S"ce:
Local Soil and Water Consmntiott District:
Local dia-movingtheavy eqijipmeut compmieq:
/V 141
2. ToE Y'Ll e it so
3.
Local contiract punipin grutigittion equipment collipanies..
e Vame
2.
3.
J�hoqp 9
q1O - �2 -617-
&A - 7, Q--
th Otte /I
Step (4) hplement proce�lures as advised I)Y': KF , DEM, and techlilcal assistance
agencies to rectify the darnrige, repair Me system, anI reassess the nutrient
management plan to prevent future probiemsq.
'v All

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
Using this outline as guidance, you should develop a specific emergency action plail for
your waste handlinp system. This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off the site. You should NOT wait
until wastes reach surface waters or leave your properly to consider that you have a
problem. You should make every effort to ensure that this does not happen, This plan
should be available to all employees at the facility, as accidents, leaks, and breaks could,.
happen at any time. Your plan should follow this formal:
I Stop (lie release of was(es. Depending on tile situation, this may or
may noi be possible. Suggested responses to problems are listed below:
a. Lagoon overflow— ossible solutions are:
add soil to rerm to temporarily increase elevation of dam —any
permanent alteration of [lie clam should be approved by a
qualified lechnical,Tecialist
purnp wastes to fie at an acceptable rate
=all additional flow to the lagoon (waterers) —hold waste in
e if possible
call a pumping contractor
make sure no guirface water is entering lagoon
NOTE: These activities should be started when your lagoon level has exceeded the
temporary storage level.
b. Runoff from waste application field —actions include:
immediately stop waste application
create a temporary diversion or berm to contain (lie wasle.on
the field
incorporate waste to reduce further runoff
C. Leakage from the waste distribution system:
pipes and sprinklers —actions include:
— stop recycle (flushing system) pump
— stop irri ation pump
— close valves to eliminate fut-ther discharge
— separate pipes to create an air gal) and stop flow
flush system, houses, solids separators—adions include:
— stop recycle (flushing system) pump
— stop irrigation pLIMP
— make sure no siphon effect has been created
— separate pes to create an air pap and slop flow
Leakage from base or spi t
d. idewall of lagoon. 0 en these are seepage as
opposed to flowing leaks —possible action*:
di a small well orditch tocatch all seepage, put in a
Imersible pump, and pump back into lagoon
su
if holes are caused by burrowing animals,trap or remove
animals and fill holes and compact wilh a clay type soil
other holes may be likewise ternporailly plugged with clay soil
Lagoon problems requ ire the consu ha (Jon of a n in dividua I
experienced in the design and installation of lagoons for permanent
repair measures.
raw,
J.m

A 5
r
Or EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY (DWO) [phone]
EMERGENCY MANAGEMNET SERVICES (EMS) [phone]
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SWCD) [phone]
NATURAL -RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS) [phone]
COOPERATIVE EXTERSION SERVICE (CES) [phone]
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave you property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every
effort to ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible
location for all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should
take.
Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may ore may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed belwo.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon Immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions Include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste,
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that cause the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed
to flowing leaks -possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch from the embankment to catch all
.seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill
holes ' and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.

2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c: Any damage notes, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours call your DWQ regional office; Phone - -. After
hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility number, telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2
above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of
the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been
under taken, and the seriousness of the sitution.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phone number.
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Helath Department.
d. Contact CEs, phone number - , local SWCD office phone number and local
NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number -
4. if none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's Department and explain you
problem to them and ask the person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair or problem to minimize off -
site damage.
A
a. Contractors Name: Kid,, Bqc- t
b. Contractors Address: J
c. Contractors Phone:
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting
Engineer, etc.)
a. Name- !�s Im — N
b. Phone: 11%19 --IQ L-
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste managment plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
2
I

S. DEPARTMENT Of AGRICULTURE
,tURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
�nonsvitte
CONSERVATION PLAN
Page I of 1
02/07/96
[phone]
Client: King, V.
Craig
King forms
katist3d Bys Michael
................................
E. Sugg
....... ............................
--'—
LAND UNITS I
�- PLANNED
..................................
APPLIED
................ — -------------------------
'ItACT I FIELD
AMOUNT I MORT141 YEAR I
----------------------
AMOUNT I DATE
PLANNED CONSERVATION 7REAT14ENT
-------- ­ ------ ...........................................
.........................................
.....................
I I I
I
BLTU
4.jAcj
I
Impipment a waste management system to property store, treat
ard diapose of animal waste. Apply waste to growing crops or
within 30 days of planting a crop, Apply at rates
recommended by a soit teat report and waste analysis.
a? 11
1
2.08cl
05 1 1994 1
2.OaCI07/01/1"41
Critical area planting
Seed all bare areas around hog houses mid lagoon to permanent
gross as recommended in the lagoon design.
See Job Sheet Ill.
87 11
1
1.0mal
05 1 1991 1
I.ONOI06/01/19921
Waste treatment lagoon
I
Construct animal waste treatment lagoon (or the biological
I
treatment of animat waste. construct according to SCS
I
..........
------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
standards and "cifications.
-------- ----------------------
.......... .............
a Fiekda marked as MEL are highly erodibka field@. kit practices pthnned and installed are for the reduction of erosion and wilt
meet the Standards and Specifications contained In the USDA-SCIS Field office Technical wide.
EL* This treatmerit must be applied and maintained to meet FSA Compt lance. idle tend with at least 50% ground cover maintained on
the surface continuously may be substituted for a row crop In the Conservation Cropping Sequence Management Practice and, If
appticabie, the planned and associated supporting management practices - Conservation Tillage and Crop Residue Use for the
some time period and field.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CO14SERVATION SERVICE
KenansvILte
Page 2 of 2
OP/07/96
(910296-2121
CONSERVATION PLAN
client: King, V. Craig King Forms
Assisted Byi Michael E. Sugg
................................. ..................... ------- --------- -------------------
LAND UNITS
PLANNED APPLIED
.............
TRACT I FIELD
--
I AMOUNT I
------------ ----------------------
MORTHI YEAR I AMOUNT I DATE
I PLANNED CONSFRYATlOR TREATMENT
..........................................
I
I I
-------------------------------------
I I
I
.............. ---------- 11 ..........
I HAYLAND
3511 12
1 2.7Acl
I I
I
I
I
3511 12
I I
1 2.7acl
I - I
03 1 1996 1
1
1
Nutrient management
Apply fertilizer and/or animal waste In accordance with the
attached nutrient management reconnandations.
3511 12
1 2.7ael
04 1 1996 1
Pasture and hayLand management
3511
3511
2. 78C 03
2.7sc 03
1996
M VAirl
Now hayland at proper cutting height and time for the hay
species. Maintain hayland In good cover with seed mixture
which suits drafnage limitations of the solt. Lime and
fertilize by soft test.
I See Job Sheet 102.
Pasture and haytend planting
Disk and prepare firm seed bed, time and fertilize accardIng
to a soft test and sprig with coastal bermoda at the rate of
10 to 12 bushels per acre If set in rows or 25 bushels per
acre if broadcast.
See Job Sheet ID1.
Waste utitizotion
Utilize swine waste by punping tagnon effluent an cropInnd or
grassland. Waste should he analyzed fat, nutient content and
fields shoukd be soit tested. Waste should be appiled at a
rate determined by the waste analysis and the soft test.
See Job Sheet 130.
.-I ..........................................................
................. — ......
HEL Fields marked as HEL are highly erodible fletds. All practices pianned and Instatted are for the reduction of erosion and will
weet the Standards find SPecIfIcationa ctntalned In the USA-SCS Field OffIce Technical Guide.
9W This treatment must be applied and maintained to meet FSA 'Co"ptlance. We (and with at least 50% around cover maintained an
the surface 'continuously may be substituted for a row crop In the Conservation Cropping Secr-ience Mannuement Practice and, If
applicable, the planned and associated supporting management practices - Conservation Tillage and Crop Residue tire far the
game time period and field.
4

U.S. DEPAR7MEN7 OF AGRICULTURE
WA71JRAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Kenensvilte
Page I of 2
02/ID7/96
[phone]
CONSERVATION PLAN
client: King, V.
Craig
King Farms
Assisted By: Michael
E. Sugg
...............................................................................................
LAND UN17S I '.
PLANNED I
APPLIED
-------
................. I -------------------------
TRACT I FIELD I
AMOUNT I
I
MONTHI YEAR I
....................
----------------------
AM"T I DATE I
PLANNED CGHSERVATION TREATMENT
-------------------- ------------
................
I
I
I I
.........................
I I
I ............ —
Cropland
1511 11
1
4.7Acl
I I
3511 11
4.7acl
05 1 1995 1
4.7ocID7124/19951
Conservation cropping sequence
Each year follow a cropping system of conservation tilled row
crops.
See Job Sheet 110.
3511 11
4.7oci
05 1 1995 1
4.,racIO7/24/19951
Conservation tillage
Conservation tilled row crops will be planted with a minimum
of 30% ground cover remaining on tire soil surface after
planting.
See Job Sheet 104.
3511 11
4.7acj
05 1 1995 1
cover and green manure crop
seed a winter cover crop of small gain, legumes, or other
grosses Immediatety after crop harvest of low residue
producing crops such as'tobacco, corn allege, sweet
potatoes, etc. Leave the cover crop on the (and until 30
days before succeeding crop Is planted.
See Job Sheet 120.
3511 11
1
4.78cl
05 1 1995 1
4.7ocID7/24/19951
crop residue use
Maintain at least a 30% grotmid cover of plant residue on the
soil surface from harvest until 30 days before the
succeeding crop Is planted.
See Jt6 Sheet 128.
3511 11
4.7acl
05 1 1995
Nutrient management
Apply fertilizer and/or animal wnnte In accordance with the
............. ..........
-1 .......
— .........
--------- .............
attached nutrient managemoent recommendations.
................... I .......... -11 ............. -------
.........................
HEL fields marked as KIL are highly erodible HeWs. All prectl ces planned and Installed are for the reduction of erosion and will
meet the Standards and Specifications contained In the Uswscs rltld office lechnical Guide.
HELO This treatmint must be applied and maintained to meet FSA Compliance. Idle land with at least 501 ground cover maintained on
the surface continuously may be substituted for a row crop In the ConAervation Cropping Seqlence Management Practice and, If
applicable, the planned and associated supporting management practices - Conservation Tillage and Crop Residue Use for the
same time period and field.
0

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULT URE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Page 3 of 3
02/08/96
[phone]
CONSERVATION PLAN
Client: King, V.
Craig
King Farms
Assisted Py: Michael
..............................
t, sugg
­
....................
­ ...............................
­ ------------------ -----------------------
. .
LAND UN17S I
PLANNED
I
APPLIED
..................
TRACT I FIELD
.......................
AMOUNT 1
140117111
----------------------
YEAR
AW)LINT I DATE
PLANNED CONSERVATION TREATMENT
------------------------------------------------
--- ----------------
-------------------------------------
See Job Sheet 130.
..............................................
.......................................
....... ­­ ...... ............. .............
HAYLAND
3471 12, 3, 4 1
6.7ACI
I
I
I I
I I
3471 12 I
I
1.78cl
I
03 1
I
1"6 1
Nutrient management
13 1
2.3acl
03 1
199's I
Apply fertilizer and/or animal, waste In accordance with the
14 1
2.7ael
03 1
1996 1
attached nutrient management recommendatiorno.
3471 12 1
1.7ael
04 1
1996 1
Pasture and hny(and management
13 1
2.38cl
04 1
1996 1
Mow haytand at pr"r cutting height and time for the hay
14 1
2.7acl
04 1
1996 1
species. Maintain hayland In good cover with sped mixture
which suits drainage limitations of the soil. Lime and
fertilize by sell test.
See Job Sheet 102.
3471 12 1
1.70cl
D3
1995 1
1.7acIO2/07/19961
Posture and hayLand planting
13 1
2.3acl
03 1
I"S 1
2.3ociOZ/07/19961
Disk and prepare firm seed bed, time and fertilize accordfrig
14 1
2.7acl
03 1
IM 1
2.7aclO2/07/19961
to a soil test and sprig with coastal bermucle at the rate of
10 to 12 bushels per acre if Set In rows or 25 bushels per
acre If broadcast.
See Job Sheet 101.
3471 12
1.7acl
03 1
1996 1
Waste utilization
13
2.3acl
03 1
1996 1
utilize swine waste by pipping tngoon effluent on croplard or
14
2.78cl
03 1
1996 1
grassland. Waste Should be analyzed for nutient content and
fields should be Solt tested. Waste shomid be applied at a
rate determined by the waste analysis and the soil test.
See Job Sheet 130
... ... ..... ....
............... � I... � ----
HEL Fields marked as HEL are highly erodible iietcls. All practices pkarwved and installed are for the reduction of erosion and wikt
W*et the Standards 11"d Sp*cif1c0tiDM contained In the USIDK-SCS Vleld Dfflce Technical 'Guide.
IftV This treatment must be applied and maintained to meet rSA C'ompHance. Idle (and with at least 50% ground cover maintained on
the surface'contlnuousty my be substituted fOr 8 row ernp In the Conservation Cropping Sequence Management Practice and, 1(
applicable, the planned and associated supporting management practices - conservation lillage and Crop Residue Use for the
same t1me period and field.
4 4

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NA7LMAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Kenonsvitte
Page 2 of 3
02/09196
[phone]
CONSERVATION PLAN
client: King. V.
Craig
Xing Forms
Assisted By: Michael
..............................................
E. Sugg
­ ..................
­ ................ ................. ­ ---------
................
LAND tMITS
PLANNED
APPLIED
............. ....................
TRACT FIELD
AMOUNT I
MORTHI
----------------------
YEAR I AW)UNt I DATE
I PLANNED CONSERVATION TREATMENT
....................... -------- ....................
........... .............
I
­ ----------
I
..............
I
­­
I cropland
3471 11, S. 6 1
3i.Wi
3471 1`1 1
19.70cl
05
1995 1
Cmaervation cropping sequence
15 1
7.7@cl
05 1
1995 1
Each year follow a cropping system of conservation tilled row
16 1
3.88cl
05 1
1995 1 1
1 er" .
I I
I
I
I I
I See Job Sheet 110.
3471
3471
3471
3471
3471
19. lac 1 05 1 1995
7.7acl 05 1 1795
3.8acj 05 1 1995
19. 7a c
7. Tac
7.7ac
3. see
19.7ael
7.7sc
3. see
19.7ac
7.7sel
3.8ad
05
as
05
1995
1995
1995
05 1995
05 1995
05 1995
05 1 I"s
US 1995
05 1"5
05
05
05
1995
1"5
Conservation tillage
conservation tilted row crops mitt be planted with a minimum
of 30X ground cover remaining on the soil surface after
planting.
See Job Sheet 104.
Cover and green manure crop
seed a winter cover crop of small gain, legumes, or other
grosses immediately after crop harvest of low residue
producing crops such as tobacco, corn silage, sweet
potatoes, etc. Leave the cover crop on the land until 30
days before succeeding crop Is planted.
See -Job Sheet 120.
Crop residue use
Maintain at least a 30% ground cover of plant residue on the
soil surface from harvest until 30 days before the
succeeding crop Is planted.
See Job Sheet 128.
Nutrient mAnagevent
Apply fertilizer and/or animal waste In accordance with the
attached nutrient management recommendations.
Waste utillintio"
Utilize swine waste by pumping lagoon effluent on cropland or
grassland. Waste should be analyzed for nutient content and
fields should be soit tested. Waste should be applied at a
rate determined hy the waste analysis and the soil test.
.........................
HEL I'letcls marked as MEL are highly erodible fields. Ali practices piamed and Installed are for the reduction of erosion and will
meet the 19tandhrds otd Spetificati" contained In the Usdh-tct Field Office Technical Guide.
MEL* This treatment must be applied and maintained to meet rsA Compliance. Idle land with at least 50% ground cover maintained an
the surfac6 continuously may be substituted for a row crop in the Conservation Cropping Seqjence Management Practice and, If
applicable, the plonned and associated supporting management practices - Conservation Tillage and Crop Residue Use for the
same time period and field.
4

U.S. DEPARTMENT Or AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVA7109 SERVICE
f
map
symbo I
SOIL MAP LEGEND
King Forms. - King, Y. Craig
Sol I name
Q0A 16oldsboro koanvy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
NoA Imorfalk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
NoB jWorfGIk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
NONTECHNICAL SOILS OCSCIIPTIOM REPORT
King farms - King, V. Craig
I
Hop Sol( name and description
Srrho I
�.A &oldsboro loamy sand, 0 to'2 Percent slop 6
These nearly level, very deep, moderatel: well drained
soils are on up[ "s. They formed In loamy marine
sediments. They have a sandy surface [over and 4 Io&W
subsoil. Permeability is moderate and shrink-swett
potential Is low. Seasonal high water table Is within a
depth of 2.0 to 3.0 feet.
NOA Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
These nearly level, very deep, wait drained soils are
on uplands. They formed in loamy marine sediments. They
have a sandy surface layer and a lowy subsoil.
Permeability is moderate and shrfnk-sweLi potential is
tow. SeosGrtat high water table Is below 4.0 feet,
NoB Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
These gently sloping, very deep, well drained soils are
on uplands. They formed In loamy marine sediments. They
have a sandy surface layer and a loamy subsoil.
PermeBbitity is moderate and shrink-swelt potential is
Low. Seasonal high water table Is below 4.0 feet.
PAGE I OF 1
02/8/96
-1

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Kenansville
Page I of 3
02/OB/96
[phone]
CONSERVATION PLAN
Client: King. V. Craig King Farm
Assisted By: Michael E. Sugg
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LAND UNITS I '- PLANNED I APPLIED
............ 1-11 ... I ------------------------- I ----------------------
TRACT I FIELD I AMOUNT I M014THI YEAR I AMOUNT I DATE I PLANNED CONSERVATION TREATMENT
........... .................. 111-1.- ........................... ..................... ........
I I I I I I I BLTU
3471 Ila I 5.3ftl I I I I Implement a waste management system to property store, treat
and dispose of animal waste. Appty waste tio growing crops or
within 30 days of planting a crop. Apply at rates
recom. nded by a soil test report and waste analysis.
3471 Ila I 2.OacI 05 1 1991 1 2.04CI06/01/19921 Critical. area p(nntlng
seed ati, bare areas around hog houses and lagoon to permanent
grass as recommended In the lagoon design.
See Job Sheet 111.
3471 Ila I 1.09al 05 1 1991 1 I.ONOI06/01/19921 Waste treatment tagoon
I I I I I I I construct animal waste treatment lagoon for the bialoglent
I treatment of onlma( waste. Construct according to SCS
I standards and specifications.
---------------- ............................ ­­ ... ------------------ ------ -----------
................... —­
HEL Fields marked as HEL are highLy erodible fletcls. All prec(I ces planned and InstaLled are for the reduction of erosion and witt
meet the Standards and Specifications contained In the 'USDA-S'CS field Office Technical Guide.
HE0 This treatmdnt must be applied and ma Intnined to meet FSA Comptiance. Idle land with at least 50% ground cover maintained on
the surface continuously may be substituted for a row crop in the Conservation Cropping Sequence Management Practice and, If
applicable, the plamed and associated supporting management practices - Conservation Tittage and Crop Residue Use for the
asma time period and fleid.

RECEIVEI)
INSECT CONTROL CHECKLIST FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS WATER QUALITY$ECTIOIV
M
Sou�ce Cause BMP's to Minimize Odor Site specific tce
(Uquld Systems) "rg(). Parmiltilng
Flush Gutters Accumulation of solids (frlush system Is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated
solids firom guttats as designed.
04emover bridging of accumulated solidq at
discharge
Lagoons and Pits cturind Solids 144aintain lagoons. sattlino hasins and
pits where peat breeding Is apprifent to
minimize the ceusting of s6lids to a depth
of no more than 6-8 Inches over more than
30% of surface.
Excessive Vegetative Decaying V0001311011 I W'etintain vagetative contiot along hanks of
Growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along Wat0l"a edge on impoundment's perimeter,
(Ory Systumal
Feeders rand 5�i—llnvm- I Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e,g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minin'siza the accumulation
of decaying wastage.
I I Clean up v pilla go on a routine basis (e.g. 7- 10 day
Interval during summer: 16-30 day interval during wintirl.
Feed Storage Accumulations of feted tesiduers I I Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
Immediate perilmoter of feed storage areas by
Insuring dr sine go away from site andlor ptovidino
adequate containment (e.g., coveted bin for
browse's groin and similar high moisture grain
products).
111 Inspect for and remove or break tip accumulated
solids In filter strips wound food storage as needed,
Animal Hoiding Areas Accvniulations of aninial wasles I I Flitnintite low area thot Pap moisture a�ong lances
and feed Waslagn and o1her locations whers waste accumulates and
and d*pstu;beince by OniMOIS is minimal.
I I Maintain (once iows.and filter strips around animal
holding asses to minimize accumulations of wastes
ji,o. lnqpoct for and remove of break up accumulated
solids as neoded�.
AMI-WIvembeir 11, 1996
P -�

MIS
IN
DryManore Handling Accumulations of animal wastes Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g. 7-10 day
Systame Interval during summer, 1.5-30 days Interval.during
winter) where manure Is loaded for land applicatio"
-or disposal,
Provide for�adequato drainage around "�anura stockpiles.
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated wastes
In filter stripes around stockpiles and manure handling
areas as needed.
The issues checked ��ertain to this operation, Tile landownertintegrator agrees to use sound judgment in applying
insect control measures as practical.
I certify the aforementioned -insect control Best Management Practices have been reviewed with me.
Ze
(Larofiwner'S
(Farm Name)
31— 1 3) - q6")
(tacilfity Number)
For fftm informoVon rontact the Cooperative Extension Service, Departmant of Entomology, nox 7613. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
27 qOi-7 613.
A I MIC—November 11. 1996

K
0
SWINE FARM WASTE MANAGEMENT ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST
Source
Cause
BMP's to MWimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead
Swine production
( LWgetatiiva or wooded buffers;
0-Wcornmended beat management
practices,,
)�eood judgment and common sense
Animal body surfaces
Dirty manure -covered animals
44-dry floor's
Floor surfaces
Wet manura-covered floors
(Matted floors,
1+'Waterers located over clotted floors;
(0 1 �4*adors at high and of solid floors-,
I Wrape manure buildup from floors;
UJOhdarfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits
Urina
Ft "quent manure removal by flush,pit
rachotgo,ar scrape
Parit8l MiCWhial decomposition
I Wnderfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fens
Volatile gases..
(4-fan maintenance;
Dust
(lUf1clent air movement
Indoor surfaces
Dust
(4AVbshdown between groups at animals
Food additives:
Foadej covers-,
I Feed delivery downspout extenders to
leader covers
Flush tanks
Agitation or recycled lagoon
I Flush tank covers
liquid whiles tanks are filling
I I Extend fill lines to near bottom of
tanks with anti-Biphon vents
Flush alloys
Agitedon during wastewater
flush with underfloor
conveyanance
ventilatlon
Pit recharge points
Agitatlon of racyc;ad tagoon
Extend rechard lines to near bottom of
liquid while Pits are filling
pits with and -siphon vents
Lift stations
Agitation during sump tank -filling
I Sump tank covers
and drawdown
Outside drain collection
Agitation during wastewater
Box covers
or junction boxes
conveyance
End of drainpipes at lagoon
Agitation during wastawo(or
Extend discharge point of pipes
underneath lagoon liquid level
Lagoon stir(aces Volatile gas emissions
Biological rn ixing
Ag4ation
Irrigation sprinkler nozzles High pressure agitation
Wind draft
0
AMOC--Novembar 11, 1996
"'Proper lagoon liquid capacity
I rCofreot lagoon startup procedures
('YfAinimum surface area -to -volume ratio
CrMinimum agitation when pumping
( ) Mechanical aeration
I ) Proven biological additives
(+trtigole an dly days with little at no wind
(T'Milnimum recommended operation presBure
Crf�ijmp Intake near lagoon liquid surface
I ) Pump from second-stapa, lagoon

Storage tank or basin Partial microbini do cmposition I I Bottom or midlevel loading
surface Mixing while filling I I Tank covets
Agitation when emptying I Basin surface mats of solids
I I Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface Partial micobiat decomposition I I Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
Mixing while filling level
Agitation when 6mptying I ) Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge Agitation when spreading k4oll Injection of slurty/sludges
spraada� outlets Volatile gas emissions (<Wash residual manuts from spreader after use
Proven biological additives of oxidants
Uncovered n)anure. Slurry VoIntila gag emissions while drying (T'Soll infection of slurry/sludges
or sludge on field surfaces tlell Incorporation within 48 houfs
0-<Pread in thin uniform favors far rapid drying
I ) Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals Caveats decomposition (,LRr6pac disposition of carcasses
Dead animal disposal Cafengs decomposition ( ) Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits
pits I I Proper locationtconattuction of disposal pits
Incinerators Incomplete combustion I ) Secondary stack burners
Standing water around Improper drainage (4-errade and lar-Oscape such that water draing
facilities Micfobial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto pubfic Poorly molintallned access roads FfF;rm access road maintenance
roads from farm access
Additional Informationt
Available From -
Swine Manure Management; 0200 Rulall3MP Packet
NCSU-County Extension Center
Swine Producaor, Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies, EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU-BAE
5 wine Production Faellit y M anure Managama nt; Pi t Recharge —Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 128 -813
NCSU-BAE
Swine P(oduatloh Facnity Manure IVInnagament: Undeffloor Fluse—l-rigoon Treatment, EBAE 129-88
NCSU-BAE
Lagoon Desig and Management lot Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
NCSU-BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment, EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU-BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings, PIH-33
NCSU-S wine Extension
Environmental Assuranc Program: NPPC Manual
NC Pork I'voducas Assoc
Options for Managing Odor; a report liorn the Swine Odor Task Fares
NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns In Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies, PRO 107, 1995 Conf Branca Pr6oeedings Florida Cooperative Extension
The issues chocked (443ertain to this operation. The landownerAntogrator agrees to use sound judgment in applying
odor control measures as practical.
I certify the aforementioned odor control Best Managment Practices have bee reviewed with me.
oee e 'ew
V
(LhiLndowner '—naturej,,�A
AMOC--November 11, 1996

MORTALITY MANAGEMENT METHODS
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours
after knowledge of the death. The burial be at least 300 feet from
any flowing steam or public body of water.
��Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G. S. 106-168.7
( ) Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and
design approved by the Department of Agriculture.
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State
Veterinarian would make possible the salvage of part of a dead
animal's value without endangering human or animal health. (Written
approval of the State Veterinarian must be attached)

Operator:==============='============="======>Craig K ng K4
Oist. to nearest residence(other than owner):
ft.
sows (farrow to finish):====================>
sows (farrow to feeder):====================>
580
111ead (finishing only):-===================>
sows (farrow,_to
head (wean to feeder):======================>
Ave. Live Weight for other operations(lbs.):>
Storage volume for sludge accum. (cu. ft.)*.=>
Treatment Volume (min. I cu. ft./lb.):==­=>
1.0
25 Year - 24 Hour Rainfall
7.5
Rainfall in excess of evaporation (in.)=====>
7.0
Drainage area of buildings & lots (sq. ft.):>
Volume of wash water (gallons/day)==========>
Temporary storage period (days):===-======>
180
Freeboard
I
Side slopes (inside lago,on):================>
2.5 # 1
Inside top length
318
Inside top width
187
Top of dike elevation
50
Bottom of lagoon elevation
38
Seasonal high water table(SHWT) elev.'(ft.):->
Total required volume:=============> 448551
cu. ft.
Actual design volume:==­=========>487980.17
cu. ft.
Stop pumping el. (> or = to 0.0 ft SHWT>
ft.
(> or = t o 44.0 ft Min)
'
Required minimum treatment volume: 302760
cu. ft.
Volume at stop pumping elevation: -312525
cu. ft.
Start pumping
ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation: -312525
cu. ft.
Actual volume less 25yr-24hr rain: 450814
cu. ft.
NOTE: Verify that temp. storage is adequate:
Req. volume to be pumped:=-> 108625
cu. ft.
Actual volume to be pumped:==> 0
cu. ft.
WA RECEIVED
TER QUAUTY 8ECTION
VUL" 2 9 1998
Nort-D;schar,,

illp 1,11T
I ILI,
F. F
7)7 5
YJ
71
LLL

NAME C. ra i :3 K i n:3 F A 6 E
ADDRESS! Wallace, NC
fYPE AND SIZE 520 sows
OF OPERATION farrow -feeder
CLASS
DESIGNED BY Jimmy Vinson
DATE 8_20-90
d
APPROVED BY
DATE
PERMANENT STOR GE
520 Hog5 N' 522 lbs per hog I Cu Ft per 1b. Z71440 Cu Ft
TEMPORARY STORAGE
271440 lbs of animal x 1.35 cu. ft. of waste per day 65960 Cu Ft
per 1000 lbs of animal wt. x 180 days
RAINFALL LESS EVAPORATION
'711 X 56700 sq. ft. surface area per 12"Per ft :3307"S Cu Ft
RAINFALL - Z5 YR. I DAY STORM
7.5" X r5670O sq. ft. cf surface area per 12" per ft. 35438 Cu Ft
TOTAL STORAGE NEEDED 405912 Cu Ft
15034 Cu Yds
ToTAL STORAGE AVAILABLE
4 122�?2
Cu
Ft
15 '3 ()'P
C11
yds
AMOUNT OF FILL DIVE
342'00
Ca
Ft
FIAT)
213900
Cu
Ft
TOTAL
348100
Cu
Ft
SETTLEMENT t0%
34810
Cu
Ft
TOTAL AMOUNT OF FILL
382'�­' 1 O-P
CU
Ft
14182
Cu
Yds
CUT TO FILL RATIO TOTAL EXCAVAT-InN
3 5
Cu
Ft
1�1- I
16-27Z
Cu
Yds

NAl1'._Z:(':r a i 9 K i no
rAGE 3
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment with mineirnum odor
control. The time required for the planned fluid level to be
-reached may vary due to soil conditions, flushing operations, -arid
the amount of , f resh water added to the system .
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Irrigatlo.n by using center pivot, gun, or
traveler is the preferred and most efficient method to dispose of
the effluent from the lagoon. Care should be taken where -applying
waste to prevent darnage to the crop5 and to prevent runoff from
the fields.
The Following items are to be carried out:
1. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches invert
of the outlet'pipes or at a pre -determined elevation.
2. Stop pump -out before the lagoon depth is less than 6 feet
deep or at a pre -determined depth. (This prevents the loss of
favorable bacteria)
3. The recommended amount to apply per irrigation is one inch,
and maximum recommended application rate is 0.5 inch per hour.
4. It is recommended that the treatment lagoon be precharged to
1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during beginnin:3
stages of the operation. Precharging reduces the concentration of
the initial waste entering thp lagr�on ther.?by reducing odors.
S,e] ids 5hc,uld be covered with water at at I times.
5. Keep vegetation or, the embankment and areas around the lagor'n
af-t d b U i I d 1 ng s mowe d
6. T-3f�pair any eroded areas and establish in vegetation.
T. Th�- Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
into waterr, of the United States. The Department of
En-ironmerltlP Health, and Natural Resources. Wastewater
Sectit,):-., I ­,is the responsibilit,!, foi- enforcing this
l aw .
'3 � Al I surface water 'is to be diverted frc-m the lagoon to ar,
adequate and Stable IL"utlet.
CrF'TTF_[CAT1ON:
I herf4,y certify that I understand the operation and maintenarice
requiremer�ts stated atovp� Fu�lthprmore, I under;tand how ritany
ap.:P­�s, are required iii ---rdq�r to land apply t'lie waste and that
tho iaor.-c-ri may liavq to be puraped '.1 or rnc,re times -a Year. Th i s
i h aq ex p I a i nPd to me and I a3r e e w i t�i FL I I prov i s i on s
stute-d in the desiorf. I also certify th�tt there are ric, residence
oth�ir thar, mine c-r r,,,y tene-rits' withirs 750 Feet of this operation.
I U ri d e r s t;i nd that compi iancf? with this desi-ars DOE2 NOT prevent
riciii-orip Frow 51 jr1'9' we bf-c. se of nuisarsEe or c-ther reasons.
j a j a t e

NANE � Craig Ki rig
APPROXIMATE ANNUAL NITROGEN (N) AND PHI__ISPHI__IRUS (P) PRODUCTION
N.- 47656 LB P: 13871 LE
TONS !--IF' WASTE STORED: 3 9 5 8
.BEFORE ANY EFFLUENT IS APPLIED TO THE LAND IT SHOULD BE ANALYZED
TO DETERMINE T14E EXACT NUTRIENT CONTENT. THE NCDA LABORATORY
IN RALEIGH Pd�FORMS WASTE ANALYSES. YOU SHOULD CONTACT
AGRONOMIC SERVICES DIVISION
NCDA, BLUE RIDGE ROAD CENTER
RALEIGH N.C. 276 11
PHONE: [phone]
WHEN APPLYING THE EFFLUEN-r TO CROPLAND IT SHOULD BE DISK AND A
COVER CROP SEEDED OR A RON CROP PLANTED TO PREVENT EROSION.
SOME OF THE EFFLUENT COULD BE USED FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES
DURING THE GROWING SEASON.
LAND REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE APPLICATION
0 capacity Feeder to Finish operation:
Land Avail. Land Required
0.0 0.0 ac. of cropland planted to corn
0.0 0.0 ac. of coastal bermudagrass--grazed
0.0 0.0 ac. of coastal bermudagrass--hay
0.0 0.0 ac. of festue--grazed
ERROR per -cent of land required is available
520 sow
Farrow to
Feeder
operation:
Land Avai I
Land Required
27.6
ac.
of
cropland planted to corn
0
13.0
ac.
of
coastal bermudagrass-3razed
10.4
ac.
of
coastal bermudagras %--hay
20.8
ac.
of
fescue --grazed
2.33.4 percent of land required is available
1)
smw Farrow to
Finish
cperation:
Land Ava j
I Lard Required
C)
0.0
ac.
of
cropland planted to corn
0
0.0
ac.
of
coastal bermuda,.jr-as5--grazed
0.0
ac.
of
co-Astal berrouda0rass--hay
1-)
0.0
ac.
of
fescue --grazed
ERPOR percent of land required is available
1:EGIN RUMPIN�3 THE EFFLUENT WHEN
THE FLUID LLVEL REACHES Outlet pipe elev.-18.0'
------------------------------
DO N1__IY LOWER THE FLUID At1JY
LOWER THAN 4. 0' elev. 44.0�
GALLONS TI'__! B�E PUMPED EVERY 6 MONTHS I 00�._,4 3 1 o n s
'mE EFFLUENT SHOULD APPLIED AT A RAIE THAT WILL NOT CAUSE ANY
RL IN (if " I - SURIR�'IUNDJN(i AREAS OR (_EACHOAC�j INTO THE GRi-JUND WATER
N DED I CAI ,-IN PAII'u-' � 9 f-). -5. 100 If"S PEZIR HOUR ANIO `HL-
-fl t LIN T 1 1

NAME Cr�oiq �"irfq
SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS
AREA TO 13E SEEDED
-APPLY THE FOLLOWING
USE THE SEED MIXTURE
INDICATED
(X)
00
5 AC.
5000 LBS. 8-8-8 FERTILIZER
10 TONS DOLOMITIC LIMESTONE
500 BALES SMALL GRAIN STRAW
250 LBS. FESCUE GRASS
175 LBS. OATS
250 LBS. BAHIA GRASS
20 LBS. WEEPING LOVE GRASS
60 LBS. HULLED BERMUDA GRASS
100 LBS. UNHULLED BERMUDA GRASS
DIVERT ALL WATEF� TO A STABLE OUTLET
YHE NEAREST RESIDENCE IS 1000 FT.
T. 11. m 1 5Q.0 ft. ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION Nail in 10" pine approx. 50' E. .,:.f sta.. A 14-00
VERY It1F1._.1RTANT — PLEASE READ CAREFULLY
THE LAGOON AND THE AREA APOUND 'THE HOG HOUSES MUST BE SEEDED NIT"
EITHER A TFv,1F,,'iRAR'( F-43 PERMAtAENr GRASS, DEPENDING ON THE TIME OF THE
YEAR, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE TIME FHE E1L-JIl.01rJGG ARE f:011--
PLETED AND READY 14j�� US&I. tWIE RECOMMI) THAHAT THE LAGOON AREA. SIDE
SLOPES, DRATNS AND ETC, . AS WELL AS THE SIDE SLOPES OF THE RAD PRE
SEEDED WITHIN FJFT�Zi�1%1 ( 1!5) JDAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION. THE GOIL WILL
NOT DRY OUT AS IF SEEDED WITHIN THIS TIMF FRAME WHICH WILI_
IN A MUCH BETTER STAND OF GRAESS. )
PA G E 5

NAMF -
Craig King PA(3E 6
DEPTH [AREA OF TOP AREA OF DOTTOM + -1 X, AREA OF llll)�,ECTIONJ
.VOLUME = --------- ---------------------------------------------------
6.0 . 27
DEPTH I L x W + L X W + 4 X L X W I
VOLUME= ---- ---------------------------------------
6 27
10.0 1 200 Z60 + 150 X 210 + 4 X 175 X �351
VOLU;ME = --------- -------------------------------------------------
6.0 27
10.0 E 2480001
VOLUME = --------- --------
6.0 27
413333.3 CU. Fr.
VOLUME = ---------
27.0
VOLUME = 15308.6 CU.YDS.
56700.0 sq.ft.
405912.4 cu. ft. needed
SIDE SLOPES 2.U:l

z )
�,9-
-
-
- -
- -
- -
-
-
14
-
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
-- -
Fl
Hod
7c-
LW
4�
;ji 41

mmm
mom
GN
Zt�
IN
It
11
4.]J
7-T..
C7

4
IN
Jj
j
7-
44-
I I
i
I F
I L
I t

N�MF': Mr. Crai8 KinS, Kiing Farms PAGE 2
AUDRESS: Route 1r Bwx 265 RECEIVED
Tpnchey, North Ca/,o1ina 28464 WATER
TYPE AND SlZE 6,0 hogs, topp|o3 (2)
0F 0PERATION ' ' �MY ����99O8
ON
CLASS 11
~''---~^nw
� .
DESIGNED BY'- Shei/a Y. Johnson, Goi| Consmrvatiooist '
DATE Ju\y 30 199O
'
APPROVED BY \/
y L:�-
DATE
PERMANENT STORAGE
TEMPORARY STORAGE
172800 |be of animal x 1.35 cu., ft. of waste per day 41990 Cu Ft
per 1000 |by of an)ma1 wt. x 180 days
RAINFALL LEBS EVAPORATION
7" X 5-4225 sq. ft. surface area per 12"per, ft 3M' 1 Cu Ft
RAINFALL - 25 YR. 1 DAY STORM
7.5" K 54225 sq. ft. of surface area pmr 1"" per ft. 33891 Cu Ft
TOTAL STORAGE NEEDED 071l2 Cu Ft
10382 Cu Yds
TOTAL 8TORAGE AVAILABLE %87083 Cu Pt
10633 Cu Yds
AMOUNT OF FILL DlKE 69T66 Cu Ft
P�D 157080 Cu Ft
---------
TOTAL ��6846 Cu Ft
SETTLEMENT 10% IZ685 Cu Ft
---------
TOTAL AMOUNT OF FILL I49531 Cu Ft
9242 Cu Yds
CUT TO FILL RATIO TOTAL EXCADATlON �65831 Cu Ft
1.1: 1 9846 Cu Yds
~ /
/
Fill
^°^j
���� LJ� / ^ ^ ~ ^~--�'c/

PA6E 3
NAME:Cra|3 King
, OPERATION AND MAINlENANCFE
Th}y |o3oun is des>3ned for waste treahment with minimum odor
.contro|. The time required for the p|anned f1uid | eve | to be
reached may.yary due to moiI cond|tions, f|oshjnP,�j operat1ons, and '
the amount 6f fremh water -,.Ldded to the syshem.
'
Land app>icat}on of waste water is rocc, gn1zed as an acceptab(e
method of d/sposa1. Irr>Ojat/on by usin8 ceoter p>vot, Sun, or
travmIer is the preferrmd aod most mffic)ent mothud to dispoye o�
the eff|uent from the |a800n. Care should be taken when applying
waste to prevent damage to the crops and to prevent runoff frnm
the fie|ds.
The fo||ww)n8 itemy are to be carried out:
1. Be8in pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reacheb invert
of the out |et pipem or at a pre-determ|ned e1mvation.
2. Stop pump -out before the |a800n depth is |emm than 6 feet
deep or at a pre-dmtermioed deptto. (Th1s prevents the |oms of
f�vorab|m bacter)a)
3. The recommended amouot t* apply per |rri8at1on is one inch,
and maximum recommended app||cation rate is 0.5 inch per hour.
4. It iy recommended that the treatment |oDoon be precharged to
1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive oJors durin8 begim-1in8
stages of thm operatioo. Precharging reducea the coocentration o�
the in1tia| waste enterin3 the 1a30o1­1 thm1`01: !y reducin3 odors.
So|ids shou|d be covered with w a t er at a�| times.
5. Keep veget�tion on the embonkmQnt and aream armund the 1a3000 .
and bu�/dingm mowed.
6. Repair aoy eroded areas �i.nJ eytv-b|ish |n ve3ebation.
7. [t -�e CIean Water Act uf 1977 proh)bits hhe discharse of
po||utaot,s into wators the Unitpd States. The Department of
Env ironmen�, Hea|th, and NaturaI Resources, Wastewater
Mxweot Smction, has txe r0sponsbility for enPorC/s
|aw'
8. A\[ surf�ce wAter is to be diverted Prom the |a3non to an
odequate and stable outlet.
| CERT[�ICATl0N:
I herphy certify that l ondet tand the operaand maintenance
. requirmmenta otate0 aboveFurthermore' i understanJ how many
ncres are renuired \n order to |and app|y the waste and that
' the �agoon may have to be pumped 2 or Ino times a year. This
desi .--I I- hns heen exp|ain+d to me and [ aBroe wh a|| provis|onu
|
mtated in thd design. ] a|so cprtify that there nre nu res\deoce
othpr th�n mine or my t*oants' w�thin 750 feet of this opern.tion.
I unde�stand p|iaoce w|th this dn.yiOn DOES NUT prevent
| s':1weonC, from of ouis�nce or o-bher rQasons.

.. .
� .
NAME« Crai8 King
APPRdXIMA[E ANNUAL NlTRUGEH (N) AND PHOSPHORUS (P> PRODUCT[ON
N: �0275 LB P: 8830 LB
' TONS OF WASTE STORED: 2519 .
BEFORE ANY EFFLUENT I8 APPLlED TO THE LAND IT 8HOULD BE ANALYZED
~TO DET1'-_RMINE THE E),(ACT NUTRlENT CONTENT. THE 1\10DA LA8ORATORY
AGRONOMIC 5ERVICEB DIVISION
NCDA, BLUE RJDGE ROAD CENTER
1­4ALEI6H N.C. 27611
PHONE: 919-7�3-2655
WHEN APPLYING THE EFFLUENT TO CROPLAND IT 61-1O0_D BE DISK AND A
COVER CRQP SEEDED OR A ROW CROP PLANTED TO PREVENT EROSION.
SOME OF THE EFFLUENT COULD BE USED FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES
DURING THI'E' GROWING SEASON.
LAND RECjUIREMENTS FOR WAISTE APPLICATION
1.280
capacity Feeder to
Finish operation:
Land A v a i |.
Land Requ1re'd
25.0
24.3 ac.
of
cropland planted to corn
0.0
11.3 ac.
of
coasta) bermudm3rasm--8razmd
0.0
9.2 ac.
of
coastal bermudaSrnss--hay
0.0
17.9 ac.
of
rescue --grazed
102.8 perceot of )aod requir-ed |s avai|abIe
0 sow Farrnw to Feedmr operation:
Land Avai/. Land ReAu1rmd
0 0.0 ac. of crop1and p|anted to corn
0 0.0 ac. of coastal bermudta8rays--8razed
0 0.0 ac. of coastal hay
~ 0 0.0 ac. of fescue--3rA.7ed
ERROR percent cif |mnd roquired |5. a'ai|ab/e
0 suw Farrow to
F|nish
oper�tti"n:
Land Avai|. Le�d Requ|red
0 0.0
ac. of
crop/a:d
p|unted to corn
of
coasta|
bermuUa8rass--grozed
0 0.0
Z. 1.c. of
coasta|
bermuda8rass--hay
0 0.0
-,.I. of
fescuP -~Srazed
ERROR percent oP \and requirmo is ava\|ab\p
BEGlN PUMPI118 THE EFFLUENT WHEN
DO NUT LUWER THE FLUlD ANY
LOWER THAN
_.... _______________
QALLONS T� B� PUMP�D EVERY 6 MONTH8 806342 3a\lvn�
R1E EFFLUENT SHUULD B� *PPL]ED AT A RATE THAT WlLL NOT CAUSE ANY
RUNOFF UNTO �URRO\�NDING AREkS OR L�ACHIN6 l�[[O T!lE ClROUND WATER
R�COM|4ENDB` aPPP/'ICAll 0N R�TE ]S 0.5 INCHES PER HOUR AND THE
MAXlNUM H�C�NM�NDED �PF'LlCATTO� AMOUNT IS 1 TNC!| PER IRRG�TION

^ ^
NAME: Crai8 K|n8
SEEDlNG GPECIFICATIONS
"AREA l'O 8E S E I DED AC.
APPLY THE FOLLOWING
°
..' 3000 LBS. 8-8-8 FERTILIZER
6 TONS DOLOMITIC LIMESTQNE ^
300 BALES SMALL 81::ZAIN 8TRAW
USE THE GEED MIXTURE
(X) 150 L8S. FESCUE GRASS
(K) 105 L88. OATS
( > 150 L8S. BAH%A GRASS
)
( > 1LBS. WEEPING LOVE GRASS
( ) 36 LBS. HULLED BERMUDA GRASS
( ) 60 L8S. UNHULLED BERMUDA GRASS
DIVERT ALL WATER TO A 81'A0_E OU7LET
THE NEAREST RESIDENCE IS t000 FT.
T.8.M. 50.0 ft. 1E.LEVATI0M
. .
DESCRIPTlON: Noi| in 8" pine ;25 fb. N. sta. A- 0�00
VERY IMPORTANT - PLEASE READ C�AEFULLY
7HE LAG0ON AND YHE AREA AROUND THE HOQ HOUSES MUST BE SEEDED WITH
ElTH�R A TB4POHARY OR F'ERMANENT OF THE
YEAR, WlTHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS:) FROM THE TIME THE BUILDIN8S ARE COM-
PLETED 4Nol READY THAHAT THE LAGOON AREA, SIDE
SL0PEB, DRAINS AND ETC.. AS WELL AS THE SIDE EU-OPEB OF THE PAD BE
SE�DED N[TH[N F[FTEEN (1-5) DAY8 AFT�R CONSTHUCTION. ll�E SOIL WILL
NOT DRY OUT AS MUCH IF 8EEDED WITHIN 71-llS TlMG FRAME NH1CH WlLL
HE8ULT lN A MUCH BETl'ER STAND OF 6RASS')
P8GE 15

.^ . .
..
Crai3 KPAGE 6
DEPTH [ARCA OF TOP + AREA OF 80TTOl + 4 X AREA OF I'll %DGECT1UN]
VDLUME= --------- -_-_-_____________________________________________
^ 6.0 27
DEPTH [ L N W + L X W + 4 K L X W ]
~VOLUME = --------- ---------------------------------------
6 27
10.0 L 310 X 126 + 260 X PS + 4 X 285 X 1001
VOLUME= --------- -----------------------------------------
6.0 27
10.0 [ 17Z Z501
VOLUME = --------- --------
6.0 27
287083.3 CU. FT.
VOLUME = ---------
27.0
VOLUME = 10632.7 CU.YD8.
4S%00.0 sq.ft.
280812.3 cu. ft. needed
8IDE SLOPES 2.5:1

p I

`7)

Phl'
:) IN
1614,
Q
,A --
NI
Sm
a
PA
\i
W-11
\b

:4
j
0
0
MEMO

31-461
JUN 16 1998
June 11, 1998
Mr. Brian Wrenn
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Wrenn:
In response to your letter datedJune 3, 1998, regarding the inspection on May 29,
1998 the following actions have been or will be taken to correct the items noted. A request
has been made to have the WLT changed to reflect the option to plant peppers,
cucumbers, or tobacco on the land that is now listed only for tobacco. Ile erosion on the
inner wall of lagoon #1 wiU be filled, cotnpacted� and seeded to prevent future problems. It
should be noted that the previous Notice of Deficiency on this lagoon was for a cut on the
outer wall, which has been coffected. The bare areas on the top of lagoon #1 win be
reseeded after top soil has been placed in those areas to enhance growth.
The stockpiled poultry litter in tield 92 has been removed.
Upon completion of the above listed coffective action, I will notify your office.
incerely
Jack Alphin
JA:ha

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
May 29,1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RE=PT REQUESTED
C—rai—gK—ing
King Farms K-4 & K-5
126 Garland King Rd
Teachey NC 28464
Farm Number: 31 - 467
Dear Craig King:
FRECEEIVED
J
JUN 0 4 1998 jwwTl
A
BY.—
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NAruRAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that King Farms K4 & K-5, in accordance with G.S. 143-2153 OC, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Dave Holsinger with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
A. r.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Wilmington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

P 057 082 818 A�o
us Posw Service
Receipt for Certified Mail
No 4mance Cevmgs ftvklod.
00 rK4 use iGr Irdomationo) Ma O�iw /Overse.)
s
N" Fae
Whom& Qa—WW*rod

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 29, 1997
Mr. Craig King
King Farms K-5
126 Garland King Road
Teachey, North Carolina 28464
Subject: Notice of Violation
King Farms K-5-
31-467
Duplin County
Dear Mr. King:
F, A dh
E) UE Ft
i
You are hereby notified that King Farms K-5, which has been deemed permitted to have a
nondiscliarge permit for an animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217, has been
found to be in violation of its 2H .0217 Permit.
On March 18, 1997, in response to a complaint, staff from the Wilmington Office of the
Division of Water Quality inspected your animal operation and the lagoon(s) serving this operation. It
was observed that wastewater was present in field ditches adjacent to spray fields indicating a past
discharge. While no discharge of waste was observed to waters of the state at the time of inspection, any
rainfall event could likely result in the discharge of waste from the ditch.
As was discussed with you at the time of the inspection, extreme care should be taken to ensure
that runoff does not occur during waste application. Using proper buffers and shorter spray runs will
reduce the risk of future runoff. The waste present in the ditch should be blocked to prevent possible
discharge and the waste should be pumped back into the spray fields.
The Division of Water Quality may proceed to revoke King Farms K-5 permit unless the
following conditions are completed:
1. Immediately eliminate the discharge of wastewater and/or list actions to correct the noted violation.
2. Make any modifications needed to ensure there will be no future discharges.
127 Cardinal Drive -Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845 *,Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Craig King
Page 2
Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section Operations Branch
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
To remain a deemed permitted facility, all corrective actions must be made within fourteen
(14) days. Failure to do so may result in the facility losing it's deemed permitted status, requiring a
certified waiste management plan and cerfification form for the facility to be submitted prior to the
December 31, 1997 deadline., and being required to obtain an individual nondischaTge permit for the
facility.
Failure to comply with the above conditions will cause the existing animal waste
management system serving you�anirnal operation to be considered in operation without a permit as
required by North Carolina General Statute 143-215. 1.
Please be advised that this assessment does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from
taking enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violations.
When the required corrective actions are complete, please notify this office in writing at
the address above. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please caU Mr. David Holsinger
at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
M—L' C- V-- 5 1' V C r—
Rick Shiver, P.G.
Regional Supervisor
attachments
cc: Mchael Sugg, County Soil and Water Conservation
Brian Gannon, NC DSWC
DWQ Operation's Branch File
Wili-n-iffg-OR-Files
S.\WQSkANDYAU 1-467.NOV

0 .
10 Routifue * Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Foliow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date Of Inspection
Facility Number Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
it e. n aclion of Ito u rs
Farm Status: Certified "In)).9pent on Rcvlewai` F7737777
rave and pr6c
Farm Name: King.Earms.K-.5 .............. ............................................... .............................. County: Duplin WIRO
OwnerNante: Crzig ....................................... King ............................................................. Phone No: ...........................................................
Mailing Address: 126-Garland.King.Rd... ................... . ............................................... Teachey .. RC ................................. . ....................... 28464 ...........
Onsite Representative: Ruddy..Kiag ................................................................................. In tegrator: LudepejadeELt ...........................................................
Certified Operator: Clara.R ...... .......................... Millcr ................................................ Operator Certification N u rn ber: M119 .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 34 47 Longitude 57
113 Not Opera= Date Last Operated: ...............................................................................
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Gencral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
jj Yes No
Ej Yes No
Cj Yes 1W No
Cj Yes E3 No
Yes
M No
Yes
0 No
E3 Yes
Ug No
[3 Yes
H No
Confinaed on back

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? 0 Yes S No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after I/l/97)? 0 Yes IM No
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? [3 Yes Ig No
!�Lrmr,Wj u-skWoo—u—sa-in m1ding-Load-S)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? 0 Yes ig No
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon I Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
2.5
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
0 Yes
11 No
11. 1 s. ero s io n, or an y oth er th re at s t o th e int egrity of any of th e stru cture s ob served?
D Yes
H No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
C) Yes
11 No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
[]Yes
0 No
Waste Ap
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
W Yes
0 No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type --------------------- - - ----------- ---------
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
Yes
[]No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
[3 Yes
M No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement? E3 Yes Ij No
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? C3 Yes jj No
Ear Certif ied Fa Ries OkI
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? [3 Yes U1 No
2 1 . Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way? 11 Yes C3 No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? 1 [3 Yes X No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? H Yes (j No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with owner or operator in charge? 0 Yes 1% No
Reviewer/Inspector Name ------- -------- ------ -- -------------------------
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
�Date �� 7
cc.* Division ol Water Unality, Water (Valift Section, Pacility Assessment Unit 11/14/96

N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMPLAINTIEMER GENCY REP OR T FORM
WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
Received bjr:
Fft 0 r- 1� & W81
I or",
Ow ri , ..,
—I . ;ffi�&
03mplaint or Incident:
Tim aLud Da te Occurred:
- L4-)
tt �3
tion of Area Affected:
Surface Waters Involved: X Graundwa ter involved: Other-
OLhe Agencies/Sectims Notified:
Invest-ignt-ion Details:
1) V Jr. t,-Y- '�( t.A. ( L4 1 4 1 q :3 ,
A-4
investigator: Al..�bg
r. t. I -f-)
EPA Resion IV (4M347Z P.S.W Rmemimcy 733-3867 WWe Resources 733-7291
SoW and Hazardous Waste 733-2178 Marine Reherin 72&7021 Waw Suppty Branch 733-2321 U.S. Coast Guard MSO 3434U)
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Mirnington, N.C. 28405-3945 0 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]OD4
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Environmental Chemists, Inc.
� ren7virochen�,
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: SIEPPING ADDRESS:
CONSULTING P.O. Box 1037 [phone] (Office) 6602 Windmill Way
CHEMISTS Wrightsville Beach, [phone] (Lab) Wilmington,
North Carolina 28480 [phone] (Fax) North Carolina 28405
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Customer: NCDEHNR-DWQ
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wihningkm NC 28405
Date Sampled:
03/18/97
Sampled By:
Brian Wrenn
Report To-
Rick Shiver
Copy To:
Brian Wrenn
Water: Stream
APR 0 7
Date of Report:
Purchase Order
Report Number:
April 2, 1997
7-0720
LAB ID
#1 0
4 1 Field Ditch
#1731
# 2 Oaky Br.
Fecal Coliform, coloniesM 00ml
lAmmonia
9000
90000
Nitrate + Nitrite Nitrogen, NO3 + NO2 - N mg(L
3.49
2.29
Nitrogen, NH3-N, mg/L
9.33
42.6
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, TKN mg(L
9.99
44.4
Total Pho!phorus, P nWA
1.02
3.34_____j

virochem
��Gilmt -14-1
ENVIRONIVIENTAL CHEMISTS, INC 6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
Sample Collection and Chqin of (�ustodv Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Collected By: 1� �-r,, Revort. No; Pf - ip -T,� 0
-;Z.-imn1iP'1rvniP- Influmt- F.Mu-nt- WAIr itrip�mm--� �'il- C%thipr-
SA II'LE
IDENTIFICATION
COLLECTION
BO
LAB
ID
PRESERVATION
ANALYSIS REQUESTFD
DATI�ELECT
NONE
II,S
&OH
I THIO
LO-PaR
t
3/1
16 36
- t��Id
1 1"
)-7304
k
�f ca
LLk---
L
cl,-11
-7-51 A
I-r-e
tc C' t
AJ)-ji
1(,[,y
2-
C <-
Maximum Holding Time Between Collection and Analysis: BOD 48 Hours, Coliform in Wastewater fi-tiours,
Coliform in Drinking Water 30 Hours,
Transfer
Relinquished By:
Date/Time
Received 1ky:
Date/Time
1
2
Received with I Water hill�i to C: Yes No Accepted: -- &,-- ReJected:
Delivered By: A-1-- 31fgl,7-7 Received BY: Date: :�Jllrlq7 Ti me: 5--!
Comments:

110;� -
ROUTE I BOX 265
TEACHEY, N.C. 28464
919-285-2692
may 27, 1997
Mr. Rick Shiver
Division of water Quality
Water Quality Section Operations Branch
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535
Dear Rick,
RECEIVED
MAY 3 0 1997
BY:
=I
On March 18, 1997, staff from the Wilmington office of DWQ inspected the K-5
farm owned by King Farms. it was observed that animal waste was present in a field
ditch. At this time, the waste in the ditch was believed to come from excessive
spraying, as written in the Notice of Violation I received on May 12. It was later
found by Brian Wrenn to be coming from a faulty vent on a field hydrant.
However, as Brian and Andy requested the waste at the end of the ditch was re-
moved immediately.. Also, some other suggestions were made by Andy to ensure no
future risk. These corrective actions were completed the following week of the visit.
Enclosed is a copy of the letter I sent on bi�y 08,1997 to the Wilmington office
listing the corrections that had been made and asking them to set up an appointment
for another visit.
Sincerely,
6IZ4� '-�-
Buddy King
enclosure
cc: file RCCEIVED
MAy 16 1997
FACILITIES ASSESSMENT UNIT

'C.;-
ROUTE I Box 265
TEACHEY, N.C. 28464
919-285-2692
May 08, 1997
Mr. Brian L. Wrerul j
N.C. Dept. of Environment, health & Nat. Res.
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845
SubJect: liTiprovements at M & K5
Dear Brian,
an April 11, 1997, you and Andy requested Uiat some corrective actions be
made at K4 & K5. I am writing to let you know all improvements have been
ccmpleted. The improvements include the following-.
1. Faulty venL has been replAced and raised.
2. Several berms built around field hydrants.
3. Exposed irrigation lines have been double piped and marked by
above ground markers.
I would like for you or Andy to c<m take a look at the Improvements. Please
call and set up a time that would be good for ycni to come to look at Uie Improve-
ments.
Sincerely,
V; Craig King, Jr.
King rarms
cc: f ile

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment 1 JRECEIVE
Health and Natural Resourv!
Division of Water Quality NOV 12 1997
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor [ay__ -
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
November 7, 1997
MEMORANDUM
TO: Wilmington Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Sue Homewood*�'
SUBJECT: Notification of Facility Number Change'�4
FE Imml 1"A F=1
The following changes have been made to the Animal Operations Database. Please make
appropriate changes in your files.
Facility numbers 31-467 and 31-601 were combined under one facility number; 31-467.
Facility number 31-601 was deleted from the animal operations database.
If you have any comments or questions please feel free to call me at [phone] ext 502.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Afflrmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

envirochem,
CONSULTING
CKEMISTS
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC
Sample Cp1lection gnd Chain of Custody
;Qk1Mn1P'F"L'nxb- FnfillArat rMlockint nthpir-
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: (91f)) 3924)223
FAX: [phone]
SAMPLE
—IDENTI[FICATION
COLLECTION
�T
BOTTLE
ID
LAB
ID
PRESERVATION
ANALYSIS RIEOUIESTED
DATE
TIME
NOINE I
1[12so. 18CLL
N20H
OTHER
IF
/&36
-,npo
IC'C
F-e & I all
tun
L6,
tju�t'UAS
Z- T'CCC4
3
I (. r5-
7- "1
Ire
ctca�
01
-Y)a
s/1
1&15-
2-
V-
C
M-aximurn flulding Time Between Collection and Analysis: BOD 4kflours, Coliform in Wastewater 6 flours,
( I oliform in Drinking Water Kilu-uarra,
Transfer
Relinquished By:
Date/Time
Received 11y:
Date/Time
2
Ileceived w'th I AN' t to 4'C: Yes No Accepted: �, &.,— — Re ' jected:
Delivered By= M#q 2 Received By: Date: -)11'9-177 T i me: 5-.4�d
Comments: r . 75o

4100' @
CONSULTING
CHEMISTS
Date Sampled:
Sampled By:
Report To. -
Copy To:
Water - Stream
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
MArUNG ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE-
S111PPING ADDRESS;
P.O. Box 1037
[phone] (Office)
6602 Windmill Way
Wrightsville Beach,
(910) 392-OW (Lab)
Wilmington,
North Carolina 28480
[phone] (Fax)
North Carolina 28405
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Customer: NCDEHNR-DWQ L APR 0 7 1997
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext. _By.
BY.
Wilmin�n, NC 28405
03/18/97 Date of Report: April 2, 1997
Brian Wrenn Purchase Order 9:
Rick Shiver Report Number: 7-0720
Brian Wrenn
LAB ED
#1730
1 Field Ditch
#1731
# 2 Oaky Br.
Fecal Coliform, colonies/100mi
9000
90000
Nitrate + Nitrite Nitrogen, NO., + NO2 - N mg(L
3.49
2.29
Ammonia Nitrogen, NH.-N, mg/1,
9.33
42.6
Total Kjeidahi NUtugcia, TXLN1 mpL
9.89
44.4
Total Phosphorus, P mWL
1.02
3.34

virochem
C
Client:
EN V I R ON Al E NTA L CH E N11 STSJ NC 6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
Samvle ('011 "Ti an and Chain of.('ustod,%- Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Coll ted By: &&^ k�e-y%r\ Other: Report No:'1 - ID Td 0
S-nmnle'fvne: Influent. Fftluent. WalIC Stremm
SAMPLE
IDENTIFICATION
COLLECTIOA
HOTTLE
fD
LAB
ID
PRESERVATION
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
DATELECTIOA
NONE
HSO.
HCL
Na0II
'11110
OTiffR
Is/if
C)
1( , 3C)
&
7 3,L) Pr
ic
P3
ee
6
V/1-
z ccz^ 1
I f� 141� -
COLI
1-7 !)1
Ire
ccc
Maximum Holding Time Between Collection and Analysis: BOD 41-Hour fours,
.1, Coliform in Wastewater fiJj__
Coli form i n Dri n ki ng Water 10 Hoigs,
Transfer
Relinquished By:
Date/Time
Received Illy:
Dateffirne
2
Received with I T;WYel hill to, "C: Yes No Accepted: - &-,— ReJected:
Delivered fly: Mglq2 Received By: Date: 111';017 Time: Y-.'AQP
Comments: I C750

9103924424
P. 0 1
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
MA=0 ADDRESS: TELEPHONE.- SMING AMPS&
Offlo
00MULTING P.Q. OU 1037 (920) 25"934 ( ':� ) 6= WIrIffjMj I WAY
wriowAne Befth, (PIO) 3924= (Lab) WIningtoN
rvol(
I
GHEMWM NmIh Cuolin 29M (920) 392-44Z4 (Fax) IqM* CAMIka 2405
FAX HEADER SHEET
TO: I VI ce
compANY.-
K4X #:
FROM4- LIA
Number of Pages to Follow: 1 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
DATE SENT: " —2—�] r—I
COMMENT.-

9103924424
P. 03
Environmental Chenflatat Ine,
TOMHOPM., MUMM AMMS;
OmflUUMNO F.U. 5011037
MOM&&M (Offi") "wwhamlaw"y
caiumlirm wdotivals3ft0h,
(910)3ft=(LAb) WhYINM
14W& CMHVA MW
(91G) M4424 (Pax) Nodh QMUU zM
REXORT OF ANALYSIS
Cssstuznt�rz NCDEMqR-DWQ
127 N. CmdbW Dim EVL
WUMington, NC 28405
Data Somplods
03/IV97
samplod Br.
SfiflzlwTftM
Report To-.
Rick Shiver
Copy To-
Unn wram
Water - Sir
Date of Report; Aprd 2,1997
Pmmbne Order Ah
RopeA Numbers 7-0720
LAB IOD
01730
# 1 FicM Ditch
01731
0 2 Oaky Or.
Collfono, coloaka/100mi
90w
90DOO
[Fft-al
Nitra-to + Nitrfte Nitrogen# NO3 + NO., - N mg/L
itro'
3.49
2.29
M
Ammonia Nitrogen, N%-Nq wgff,
9.33
42.6
T T otal Xleldahl Nitrogenp TXN mglL
Otal
9.89
44.4
T T, Dt3l Phosoorulh P
1.02
3.34

Environmental Chemists, Inc.
awe MAMOADDUSSi TEIMHOW. SH117NO ADDRUS:
P.O. Box 1031 (910) W6-3934 (00m) 6mwudwmwgy
CONSULTING W&MIle Reach, (910) 32M23 QAb) w1hawon.
CHEMISTS Nonh Cuolina 28480 [phone] (Fox) Nmtb CamUna 23405
DATE SENT & TV": -iiNiV "r3f-A-
TO: %riax, L61rqz'f\y'\
COMPANY:
FAX N:
FROM: ��l
Numbor,of pages to fbilow: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
COMWNTS-6
10 1/0
3
q
T 13 'd VZV*PZ6R0 16

9
FORM IRR-1 Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner r%0%CA FAC-PAS Facility Number
Irrigation Operator I I
Field
Date
frnn-ddd
'Iffaml W-1=141TOR jill WTI ,rj MICN1111111111
JWA
ki
�M%j
MOM
-A *702
P, FaN mw&mw�
IF
JIM
ESEM ZAFIS�MW
kill-
SWMRIPP-V-�
Elm
;1 up, I
Off—Ax —In M
����Amm =11M
-V

N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMPLAINTIEMER GENCY REPORT FORM
WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
Received by, 0'-.>t 'C" 0jC'&'(L Mte/Time.. 17-7 1.30
Rmergwcy: ccuplaint: couzity. I—)
Report Received Ptim
KI,# " j As
. '' 4100
Address:
Cmplaint or Xneident: UL I Zia 2� POAV.:�b
A- C, ,
7,4,
Tim and Date Occu=-ed:
zom tion of Arm Affected: 'Ale-
A.)_rAe TfArwij dC­
Surface Waters Xnvolved: i-1 Groundwa ter Xnvolved: Other:
other Agencies/Sectiemn Notified:
Investigation Details: (�Ov� tz;f yo7- Vte�� 94/9,W T- 1'j'_
Lse��-A R- A�_-) --G L21-5 -
investigator: —Date.
EPA Re&n IV (404)3474M2 ArzScOn 733-3556 Bowyency Mmagewma 7334867 WAWe Raourm 733-72.91
Sdd a" Lktwdous Wwte 733-2178 MaHn* Faheries 726-7021 Waw SaMy Br"ch 733-2321 U.S. Cba" Guard MSO 3434B81
127 CArdin4l Drive Extension, Wilmington, MC. 28405-3845 0 Telephone [phone]DO 0 Fox 910-350-2004
An Equal Opportunity Affirmativs Action Employer

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B, Hunt, Jr_ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Craig King
King Farms K-5
126 Garland King Rd
Teachey NC 28464
IW-W?VFA
EDF-=HMFZ
November 13,1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: King Farms K-5
Facility ID#. 31-467
Duplin County
Dear Mr. King:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal. waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which desigpates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A. NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Both Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at91gn33-0026.
Sincerely,
reston Howard, Jr., -I;'.' ., irector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Wihnington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.0, Box 27687,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Actlon Employer
Nof
Volce 919-715-4 100 FoRMP-1-47-01 PT'M 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

AT,
0
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr. Division of Environmental Management Jonathan B. Howes
Governor
qC&tified-M
L a- i 1,1- -"Z -4-0 5 --5 9 i - —i8
BEUM RECEUT RMUES
Mr. Craig King
126 Garland King Road
Teachey, North Carolina 28464
Dear Mr. King:
Water Quality Section
September 21, 1995
Subject: Craig King Farm (K5)
Facility Number 31-467
Duplin County
Secretary
On September 19, 1995 staff from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of
Environmental Management inspected your animal operation and the lagoon serving this operation. It was
observed that the irrigation equipment had been spraying over a ditch which drains to Oakie Branch.
During the inspection Mr. Buddy King also stated that, on the evening of September 12, 1995, the spray
gun fell over while crossing a bridge over this same ditch. This caused the hose to pull loose from the
reel. He stated that the pump continued pumping for approximately 20 minutes at rate of approximately
250 gallons per minute.
The following corrective actions should be taken: NRCS guidelines for Rest Management Practices
require that animal waste not be applied in open ditches. Additionally waste must not reach the surface
waters by ninoff, drift, direct application or direct discharge during operation or land application. Future
irrigation should be done in such a manner to prevent spray from reaching open ditches. Additionally it
is recommended that a 10 - 25 feet wide pen-nanent grass filter strip should be seeded along all ditches in
fields that receive animal waste.
To remain a deemed permitted facility, all corrective actions must be made within seven (7) days.
Failure to do so may result in the facility losing its deemed permitted status, requiring a certified waste
management plan and certification form for the facility to be submitted prior to the December 31, 1997
deadline, and being required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility.
127 Cardinal Drive Extenglon. Wilmington. N.C, 29405-3845 & Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Fqual Opportunity Affirmative Aoion Emplayer

�Craig King
September 21, 1995
Page Two
0
Please be aware it is a violation of North Catolina General Statutes to discharge wastewater to the
surface waters of the State without a permit. The Division of Environmental Management has the authority
to levy a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 per day per violation.
When the required corrective actions are complete, please notify this office in writing at the address
below. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Jim Gregson or Dave Adkins at (910)
395-3900.
Sincerely,
n
Gregs n
Ur
Im
E�vironm. ntal Specialist I
cc: Dave Adkins Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Duplin County Health Department
Tom Jones - NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Operations Branch

0
ROUTE I Box 265
TEACHEY, N.C. 28464
919-285-2692
OCT 0 4 1995
September 28, 1995
Mr. Jim Gregson,
N.C. Dept of Environment
Health & Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3B45
Subject: K5
Facility #: 31-467
Problem: Overspraying ditches
Dear Jim,
I talked with Mike Suggs SCS in Duplin about rushing up my request
to determine which ditches I could fill in to make fields larger for
irrigation. He returned my call today and will be on site Wednesday,
October 4 to.make determinations on ditches. This will solve problems
at K5.
b Si Cerely,
I
Crai iVn
King Farms
cc: file
11

lot,
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr. Division of Environmental Management Jonathan B. Howes
Governor Water Quality Section Secretary
September 21, 1995
Certified Mail # Z-4-Q5 59-L_281
RETURN-RECEWr REQUESTED
Mr. Craig King
126 Garland King Road
Teachey, North Carolina 28464
Subject: Craig King Farm (0)
Facility Number 31-467
Duptin County
Dear Mr. King:
On September 19, 1995 staff from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of
Environmental Management inspected your animal operation and the lagoon serving this operation. It was
observed that the irrigation equipment had been spraying over a ditch which drains to Oakie Branch.
During the inspection Mr. Buddy King also stated that, on the evening of September 12, 1995, the spray
gunfell over while crossing a bridge over this same ditch. This caused the hose to pull loose from the
reel. He stated that the pump continued pumping for approximately 20 minutes at rate of approximately
250 gallons per minute.
The following corrective actions should be taken: NRCS guidelines for Rest Management Practices
require that animal waste not be applied in open ditches. Additionally waste must not reach the surface
waters by runoff,, drift, direct application or direct discharge during operation or land application. Future
irrigation should be done in such a manner to prevent spray from reaching open ditches. Additionally it
is recommended that a 10 - 25 feet wide permanent grass filter strip should be seeded along all ditches in
fields that receive animal waste.
To remain a deemed permitted facility, all corrective actions must be made within seven (7) days.
Failure to do so may result in the facility losing its deemed permitted status, requiring a certified waste
management plan and certification fon-n for the facility to be submitted prior to the December 31, 1997
deadline, and being required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility.
127 Cardinal Drive Exteamian, Wi;minston, N.C. 28405-3845 0 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Craig King
September 21, 1995
Page Two
0
0
L -A
Please be aware it is a violation of North Carolina General Statutes to discharge wastewater to the
surface waters of the State without a permit. Ile Division of Environmental Management has the authority
to levy a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 per day per violation.
When the required corrective actions are complete, please notify this office in writing at the address
below. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Jim Gregson or Dave Adkins at (910)
395-3900.
Sincerely,
im Gregs n
t
j 'f I
invironm ntal Specialist I
cc: Dave--AdkiKs'-Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Duplin County Health Department
Tom Jones - NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Operations Branch

REGISTRATION FORM FOR ANIMAL FSEDLOT OPERATIONS
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resour
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
4,5
NOV 1993
R E_
W*AT�R QUALITI;
Plannin,
If the animal waste management system for your feedlot operation is
designed to serve more than or equal to 100 head of cattle, 75
horses, 250 swine, 1,000 sheep, or 30,000 birds that are'served by
a liquid waste -system, then this form must be filled out and mailed
by December 31, 1993 pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H. 0217 (c) in order to be
deemed permitted by DEM. Please print clearly.
I I Y, N
Farm Name:
Mailing Address:
e- zip 1-&V-69
county: P h o n e N o xb:2 4 94�:,l A
Owner (s) Name:'
Managqr(s� Name:---- U
Lessee Name:
Farm�Location (Be as specific as possible: road na es direction,
milepost etc.) z-ild r - rez,4; &elc 7- W;l 62,412
AoAd- - 7z' - --Z WOU66S V&'Ze�17-
Latitude/Longitude if known;
Design capacity of animal waste managem_pnt syst . em (Number and type
of confined animal (s) __46,6-0
Average an-imal opulation on the farm (Number and type of animal (s)
raised) :_ /70, L;--
Year Production Began: ASCS Tract tio.
Type of Waste Management System Used: rj4d,6:��
L)
Acres Availabl.e for Land Aqticatio te:
Owner(s) Signature(s): _9731�. DATE:
V
DATE:
T_

R
Lk
Yt�
I

alp
r�7
All-

i

Ar
Lt
'7Z
1;P1
r r 9
ww z
--:I�ilk C,

t

j.
Vi
1.4v
I
j
%g
A

i

� �r
�� Hu
1:.,�� b� .�.
.�.
�.V:� �- �� . �

lsq�A
Pt

I

kl& I..
&A
N St
il/
Ilk -1,
Al.
ir vt,
d-I

I
.04

Ll
Y

Ix-
ak

�hw

44W
4 , 44
I Kv��,

�± �
. ~ v
♦f
^';^'� ��
' �, ".
1
�� ar - '�
?, ?. �-
_^hh� t4

4it
10
kF

Ab

In
I
At