310441_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

0
Type of Visit Q`Compiiance Inspection O Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O utine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notliication O Other
Fatuity Number - date of Visit: / Time:
d Not Operational d Bel
❑ Permitted ❑ Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered
Farm Name:
❑ Denied Access
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County:
Owner Name: W .. .. .. ...._ .....___ _ .. __.. W. 'Phone No:
Mailing Address:...........» ..»........» .» » ..» . _. . _� » ....»». »....»........»...»..» »»..�....................» .» »......»...».».».. .
Facility Contact: _ ._ _ ...» .».»..».... _ »».»»».»» Title:.. ».».. »M ..» .. » . .. » ...... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: , .� __. rQ . _»..._...... Integrator: , _ _.._ . _._ .� _. . _ _. .... »...
Certified Operator: _ ».» .....»......» »_.. » w_.... . __ ...»... »».».».» ..» .».»».».» » Operator Certification Number:.....»..__.....»....»».. ..
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 46 Longitude a 4 C u
Discbates & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Coliection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
12112103 Continued

Facility umber: ;3 j -- Date of Inspection
5.� Are thgre any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site winch are not property addressed and/or managed through :waste management or ❑ Yes ❑ No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
B. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctums lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ❑ No
elevation markings?
Waste ARpj eation
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crap type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.
=Gamma {refer to quteestiou #1j: .any YEwm S:aaswers and/or any. m nas a r;aay
lain bi a Mr(d a addittii6d
� won,�p � t { �� � n')� ❑Feld Copy ❑ Final Notes �
..'S,�I.e�J..�UFi�� 3 'I �� r.��c4✓,f�`.�' :.':a'' '�L.:'k ::
Reviewer/iuspector Name IMR,
u F
. '. .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: C�
liJlL/VJ vur�r�Mvr

Facility Number Date (or visit: Tiffle.-
10
Not U erati nal 0 Below
Permitted Pkertilled [3Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or bore Threshold:
Farm Name: { r County:
Owner Name:„ _& Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: 4964416< Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certifieation Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude a « longitude 0 ' 1�
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle CaDacitv Population
❑ Wean to Feeder JE1 La er I I Dairy
Feeder to Finish JEI Non -Layer I Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean -- --
❑ Farrow to Feeder 10 other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity G
❑ Gilts
i.
❑ soars Total 5SLW
�•.:.;. umber'4 Lagoons"; ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 5 ra Field Area
�.
Hoiditig Ponds 1 Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
DischarUs & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (1f yes, notify I7WQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Trealment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: !
-- J
y
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
R] No
❑ Yes
R No
❑ Yes UNo
Stricture d
Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ZNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes 6No
(if any of questions 4-6'was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public stealth or environmental threat, notifyDWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes KNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ERNO
Waste Annlfcation
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes RNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes KLNo
12. Crop type /,,y c
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ®.No
b) Does the Facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? f V Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes W No
&uuired
17. Nail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes RNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes gC No
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes 5�`No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes J,No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [9 No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes Ej No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes C.tvo
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes XNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 19 No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Cptriments (refeir to`gticstlor; #j;. Explalii.aiiy YFS:answers;andbr:any retummendatiiiris or any otlser.rvmments.r..- ;s.:�.,.
Use drawlrigs.af facility to better explain situations: (use tidrlitional pages as necessary): `#r
t4_ .. ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notesrrxk
*Z - A& + • V4,,►r Wdm4je Age- 7,'d bile '-dC AoIi5 -' *_
` 1�'r i ►7�D►^Q U�� �lrs,9 �t�Jr, O/t
Reviewer/Inspector Name {
ReviewerlInspector Signature:
Date:
05/03/0I ��r 2 / n���7 ` `' Continued

Facility Number: 3 — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the conrinemcnt building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc,)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins Fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes DiNo
❑ Yes ErNo
❑ Yes [8 No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes R] No
❑ Yes 9 No
:Additional. Comments and/or -,Drawings.-:
74
'OT rT,
de
d—
J
'W' Z"
05103101

t 1
iType of Vislt f6 Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit Routine ❑ Complaint. Q Follow up 0 Emergency Notification Q ether ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number I In Date of visit: Time: 'DQ
Not Operational tD Below Threshold
0 Permitted ❑ Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name:AA.--zoA........6�M.......................... county:........1 LPG I...............................................
Owner Name: .... C��,���n�....................... ......................... Phone No: ........................ ..... ... .......... _ ...... .... .... .»... »...........
. In.4 4'g.g
FacilityContact:............................................................................... Title:.......... 4.4................................................... Phone No: ... ........... .................. »...... ..... .....
Mailing Address: .............._ ......................
Onsite Representative:..... .....s 1Q .>I .I�...................... Integrator:_�ofjo2j .........................................
CertifiedOperator: ................................................... .......................................................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
(Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude a 1 66 Longitude i� • A «
Design Current Design Current Design Cuirrisat k'
' CattleSvn;,Ca act Po ulau Poultry Ca actPoulation CPaooi"
'.
❑ Wean to Feeder Mayer❑ Dairy f
I.
Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other t 1
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Desi Capacity
❑ �..
Gilts
❑ Boars Total $SI1W
Nuiobeir off ❑Subsurface Drains Present Lagoon Area JE3 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds ( Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impac
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. It' discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallrnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the Slate other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: .............I................................2....................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 5q,
5100
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ;dNa
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure b
Continued on back

t . ;i
Facility Number: — 1)atc of inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the imegrity of any of the structures observed? Oe/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ONO
seepage, etc.)
5. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan`! ❑ Yes XNa
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an ,
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ONO
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [;(No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? Cl Yes ;11No
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 9No
11. Is there evidence of over applicatio ? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ElYes [INn
12, Crop type I
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Require(] Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector tail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility requite a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
.fi A woi- . cieocto •►►ire gated- Otrt og NsAsit! - ;Y;ou 'Vflj-t&0iye 1jd #it t t e
ctirresputidence: about this visit.
Comments [refeir to question #] Explam—"y YES ausweit and/orauy:recnm
Use;efiraw?ings of fa cli.ty;:tg:belter caiplain situations.'[use addi4onai:page9 as
fi29OR 51754o)0
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes RrNo
❑ Yes jZf No
❑ Yes VNO
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes ;ZNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes PNo
/5/,z 1� s '
�F_ rT�ie e51144 s (f,006j,, ;
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: i.Ilk
Date:
5100

Facility Number: — Date of .Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below []Yes EfNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ONo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 13/No
roads, building structure, and/or public proper(y)
29. Is the Iand application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? [:]Yes OINo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes P<O
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes EM
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? 0 Yes XNo
Pq
y 60 sak�C fn
A s or
5/00

Ay Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
jType of Visit )WCompliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation t
Reason for Visit $ Routine Q Complaint Q Follow up ❑ Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Z.I? do Time: �J{` 11rinled on: 7/21/2000
L- I Facility Number 3
Q Not Operational G Below Threshold
Permitted © Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: .......................
OwnerName:........... ��.�.Q►'7.............'..:.[vx.ci .11 ............................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact:..............................................................................'l'itle:..,,....,.......................................-............... Phone No:..,..........,.....................................
Mailing Address:
Onsitc Representative:....,. ,?-.6-1...... AQi..--C.q.4.................................... Integrator: .!!7g!7r..hj... Fr.r -f........................
Certified Operator . ............... ........I....... Operator Certification Number:- .............. -..........................
Location of Farm:
Swine ❑ Poultry []Cattle []Horse Latitude 0 �` �" Longitude 0 ��«
Design Current
Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoldin Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Strearn impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes A No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance. man -(Wade? ElYes No
h. if dischargc is observed, did it reach Watcr cif tlic State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes No
c. II' discharge is obscrvcd. what is the estimated flow in galhnin? pt
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (11*yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ONo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part ❑f the operation'? ❑ Yes ff No
3. Were there any adverse'impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters ul'the State other than from a discharge? [:]Yes gNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway
S11-11CIUrc I
Identifier; .... ........ I ...
.�.........,
Structure 2 StrtictUrc
2—
Structure 4 Slruclurc 5
❑ Yes )'No
Structure 6
Frechoard ('inches): S ��
5/00 Continued on back

Facility Number: 3 — Date ot'.111,spection lyl�ID� i printed on, 7/21/2000
5. Are there: any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes XNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? ❑ Yes bffNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvemcnt`?
Yes
❑ No
B. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improverrent?
❑ Yes
XNo
9, Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings'?
❑ Yes
�No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
0 No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
ElYes
OrNo
12. Crop type 13e e-P-1 v4,i flail ,_9Ue ► co,-g , Sv�jLdli�
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those dA natJ in the Certified Anima(Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
9No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
O This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
0Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
2�No
Required Records & I7ocuntents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available'?
❑ Yes
,W Na
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management flan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, check)ists, design, reaps, etc.) XYcs ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation. freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑Yes XNo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'? ❑ Yes $ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'? ❑ Yes 19 No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) [:]Yes )g No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ONo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by sarne agency'? ❑ Yes XNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes gNo
Io yipla#icjtlls:oi- dgfciencies wiere noted• d(Wirig #his;visit, - Y;oo will-tepoiye 00, futtho • ;
icori is• oridence: ab"f this :visit. .... .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
7 ��� �►� � 4rees 4rarr+ lq���•, w�,�r an 6�'k s►d� ' la�m�� 2_
►V• W ark -fd ee714cv e, ve je4q-kloi arfet be.-Ae r C441;A
Wv e vpw V Act let be rr" ud -OCR 01, { .
1�• 064i" ) cd-+ deSi`j ►I/V0IUA,a c��Gj� lnlQrr''��iaLt
� keel ,4� recorei
/I • Take .Jojrypfas 4 h�Ive 4e_d eA' -6r r-ow e.'or �' ehl_v .
ReviewertInspector Name ZQ0 J7 GWa I M4.7 �'15
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r,#-_ J n. *jjl Date: 1117414Q 5/00

Facility Number: 31 — Date of Inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge it/or below ❑ Yes xNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes X No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application'? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes AffNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes RNo
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ;WNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover`? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes No
Additional omments an orDrawings:

g ' 13 Division of Soil and'Water Conservation'- -Operation ReWew ,• 4='
- p v;.,,
© Division of Soil and Water Conservation `-` Compliance Irispect3oin'I '{ '" ,.°rt.1. ,'',
;:
- a is f ^3•• i�� 'lip' ii��'.. it
Mivision of Water Quality -'Cori pliance Inspection
0 ,
Other Agency - ❑peratton.Reviiew
f B
!1. i
, v
.. ..[....... .. ._.. .. ;r cq ''fps, �... ... _e.
Routine Q Complaint ❑ Follow-up of DWQ inspection ❑ FDII0W-Up of DSWC review ❑ Other
Facility Number Date of• Inspection
]'!me or Inspection © 24 hr. (hh:mm}
0 Permitted tKCcrtified © Conditionally Certified [] Registered Q Not 0 erational Date Last U cratetl:
FarmName: ...................... f �� %'..................................................................... County: .-.. .. 11 !............................. ...........................
OwnerName: ................................. . ... . ........... ....................... ............... -................................. Phone No: ..................-.....................................
FacilityContact:-.......................................................................'l'itle:....-........................................................... Phone No: .......... -................................ -.......
flailingAddress: ................................. .................................................................................... .....................................................-....-.......-.................. ..........................
Onsite Representative: L.Q ........................................................ ...... Integraiur ` "-�� •k.'r �r................................................
..............
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
.................................. ............... - ..............
..
Latitude 0 • �' �•' Longitude 0
Design Current. „Design Current Design Current
Swine... Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population .; Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish Q ❑ Non -Layer JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑
❑ Farrow to Feeder Other '
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars Total'SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
HoldingPonds 1 Solid Traps � 'k No Liquid Waste Management System
� P � ❑ q � Y ,[
Discharges & Strearn Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes RfNo
Discharge uriginatcd at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (Il• yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c, II'discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon s Stcm? (If yes, notify DW .) Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes �Io
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Wuters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes XNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes [;N❑
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier;
Freeboard. (inches): .........13 ......................._z.............. ............................... ..... ..... .............................. ......................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes KNo
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

R
Faiility Number: — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
ElYcs
A No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
D(Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
DjrVo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
O(No
Waste A pulication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
0No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive I onding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
OjrNo
Crop
12. G'
type Ij\,\ i.
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
DKNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
(:1 No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
14Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Oyes
N(No
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
XNo
Renuired Records & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes VNo
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) K�- es ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes C�N0
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 6�Vo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes XNa
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes XNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes IkNo
25, Were :any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes j <No
�'Vq •viala#ignjs'o� dui}e�eYtcie� •wtrr� �pter3• dirririg #h�s•v�s�t; • ;Y;or�r wii�•>�eetriye �A #'u�t��r .. .
corxes uiidence. about. this visit..
Comments (refer to question #):. Explain ,any YES answers and/or. any recommendations or"any: other.ioiirimerits! ` . ;.i!J...;
g =
�.. �- ... AID
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as,necessaryj; i; r, s ` ;i ;i .1; r• } l
a 1 l) � �- -t}-=l�-.t +. ° *• t3 � '� t c.: @+tee (cm s i
Reviewer/Inspector Name
ReviewerfInspector Signature: Date:
3/23/99

Fality Number: — date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
v
�f Na
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
• }
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
o
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? 0 c. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
NrNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
No
30,
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (ix, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
*o
31,
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
KNo
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/tetnporary cover?
ElYes
9No
- - AdditionalComments an.. . or Drawings:
(Ck�`-.
fvl�-4,v �..,��J�►-fir Cx�~�! `'�c `-
J
3/23/99

. [3k"
'.
Division of Soil and Water Conseir tivn - Opeiration Review x, i •v , . " �i t
13
Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Coma fiance Luis
Ilivisian of Water Quality - Co.
liarice Itis e�titin `'`' ': t, r'' " t'I" #'
013 o Agency. -rOpira as ey+=
Other en ti R rri
Routine OComplaint Q Follow-u of DW ins ection Q Follow -tip orDSWC review JwOther
Facility Number Date ot• Inspection
'Time of Inspecliurt 24 hr. (hh:rnm)
© Permitted [3 Certified E3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 13 Not Operational Date Last Operated: p ..........................
Farm Name: ..... U�G!'�.....1.. County:........,...I.A.�......................................................
OwnerN:sme:.-.. s�J� .......� "` ........................................................... Phone No:............-...........-...............,....-................-.-..............,.......
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title: ....................................... -......... -.......... -.,. Phone No: ..................... --............................
]Mailing Address: ..................................... .................................................. ............................ ..................................................................................,,. ..........................
Clnsite Rcpresentative:.y Ln�'�Qi.......................................................................... Integrator:......
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number: ................ ... .......................
Location of Farm:
A
....................................................................................... ......... I ....... -.......... --....... .-- ... ........................... ..... �
Latitude ' 6 •6 Longitude i �� ��6
Design Current.
Swine. Caoacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
V.
❑Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area'
Holdin Ponds l Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
g'
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [:]Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [:]No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c, if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gathnin'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Ii-ycs, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ..,..... ..................... .........�............. ......................... -.......... .... -.............................. .......-....---....-.................................... I.............
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (icl trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes [:]No
seepage, etc.)
3123199 Continued on hack

1
acility Number:e3` — Likil Datc of Inspection
6. Arc there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify ❑WQ)
7. Do any ol'the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenatce/improvetnent?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Atiplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
I S. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
yi�la(igns;op it. cjengpe Wgre �tpted 00� tag 4b!s:v. . Y�oo "wii� tooiye 0a f ttho
correspondence'. about: this Visit.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments. (refer to question #): Explain any,YES'answers and/or any recommendation's or`uny;other comments; °, ,`' °'. .
l]se drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages'as necessary): ," a�;, €
i� 4
,' . ary ..
Ivtyad�•s 1�2v@. a. ed � L`L �e++ � � �� �1� � hfS� i �
tw�y
1�]C'�
s
Reviewerflnspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: C19
1 ` �cq G Gr, , " q�-XI D 1 Cx As 6t4je 3/23/99

/ I
l
Lagoon Dike Inspection Report
Name of Farm/Facility
Location of FarmTacility
Owner's Name, Address
and Telephone Number
Date of Inspection
Structural Height, Feet
Lagoon Surface Area, Acres
.22 99 Names of Inspectors
_4 1- Freeboard, Feet
?� Top Width, Feet
A Q-
%t't o
Lfa i h +e
Upstream S1ope,xH:1V► Downstream Slope, xH:1V
Embankment Sliding? Yes No
(Check One, Describe if Yes) $- 'pr,► y._,o�
Seepage?
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
Erosion?
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
Condition of
Vegetative Cover
(Grass, Trees)
Yes
_Yes
No �{vi a✓C ►� (] 4tiI%'! r I AG& Gk S1 ye (_Q/l57
No
r
3
elvej 1y
_VeQee�-� 'r ve cow oor,i�.-e
x/o
Did Dike Overtop? _Yes No
Follow -Up Inspection Needed? 11Yes
Engineering Study Needed? V Yes
If Yes, Depth of Overtopping, Feet,-P7"
PER
No
Is Dam Jurisdictional to the Dam Safety Law of 1967? Yes 1,, o
Other Comments &tsf
�� A
T
11
+I h� _-Pr5 -expefdw_A 4�^�-ier+

Name of FanTdFacility
Lagoon Dike inspection Keport
rrrl
Location of Farm[Facility
Owner's Name, Address
and Telephone Number
Date of Inspection
Structural Height, Feet
Lagoon Surface Area, Acres
Names of Inspectors
Freeboard,
1 —1ce
Upstream Slope,-Ji: IV _ �-- U Downstream Slope, xH: IV 2'
Embankment Sliding? Yes No
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
Seepage? Yes L,,�No
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
Erosion? Yes be__ �10
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
Condition of
Vegetative Cover
(Grass, Trees)
ICA-=.:Y
Top Width, Feet
Did Dike Overtop? Yes No If Yes, Depth of Overtopping, Feet
54.,6 ;7-N LAPi1cr1 C wn r-F aV-cr-
Follow-Up Inspection Needed? Yes ❑
Engineering Study Needed? Yes No N6 /►0n l r
Is Dam Jurisdictional to the Dam Safety Law of 1967? Yes No
Other Comments r't 1 �r►7 e-�"
- _. [�� �. .,•, - . .t. - ��f�: f.r•�'.'�, ":�:�Y.•'i � �'�� � . Y•,.i�^:xr f���:"rr}��!:�'�'.tr ti".

Lagoon Dike Inspection Report Fa"11'�y
Name of Farm/Facility
Location of Farm/Facility
Owner's Name, Address
and Telephone Number
Date of Inspection
Structural Height, Feet
Lagoon Surface Area, Acres
Upstream S1ope,xH:1V
Embankment Sliding?
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
Seepage?
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
Erosion?
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
Condition of
Vegetative Cover
(Grass, Trees)
Did Dike Overtop?
t
g 9 Names of Inspectors P Wr1&-e/a--
M a
_4 � _5 Freeboard, Feet in e
Top Width, Feet
r �$
r I
2- + Downstream Slope, xH:1V 1
Yes No 00 jelwlllj
Yes No►�+ +C ►� p 4�1�'1 �u �F S� a�5
a V eY
Yes No bj -e_ a i,
,Cj Ix
ve- i�C poor-.' is
i�.rvv� 11
_Yes No If Yes, Depth of Overtopping, Feet.p7c4�
Follow -Up Inspection Needed? 1'1_ Yes No
Engineering Study Needed? k Yes No
is Dam Jurisdictional to the Dam Safety Law of 1967?
Other Comments 5 111I,11,S,� �AJPr-a 6-tS
5
I
Yes 1.,- No
r
t

if
Lagoon Lille inspection nepurt
'Name of Fami/Facility �cxjyr EGtr
Location of Farm/Facility
Owner's Name, Address
and Telephone Number
Date of Inspection
Structural Height, Feet
Lagoon Surface Area, Acres
Upstream Slope,xH: IV
Embankment Sliding?
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
Seepage?
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
Erosion?
(Check One, Describe if Yes)
1��-v 1FI 1 ri
L15
f Chc.r��
Yes Loe�No
Yes Le""'No
Yes L iVo
Names of Inspectors
Freeboard,Fee�-
Top Width, Feet
J27 '
Downstream Slope, xH:IV
Condition of f 7 Q (T.ZS
Vegetative Cover
(Grass, Trees)
Did Dike Overtop? Yes No If Yes, Depth of Overtopping, Feet
Lh),5 rj ub ]7•�.r Lt n jC►.t o w� �-� ��r.e�-{zj
Follow -Up Inspection Needed? Yes o
Engineering Study Needed? L_�Yes No n%6 /►'+l le -or
Is Dam Jurisdictional to the Dam Safety Law of 1967? -Yes 11 No
Other Comments n 1;h ec

0
Facility Number Bate of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
■ Permitted a Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered 113 Not Operationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Ma,jar..Fairrn................................................................................................... County: Dupiin WIRO
Owner Name: Raban..................................... Maready.................................................... Phone No: ZQ>1:4o14f,......................
Faerlil►' Contact'...........................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
MailingAddress: P.0, Sox.37..1............................................................................................. B.eWavide... NC....................................................... 2851'a ..............
011sile Itclirescnlrrti►c:.......................................................................................... ...... Integra(or•:Murpthy..Family..Fs tins..................
Certified Operator: B..R......................................... Max.cady .......................................... Operator Cer dfication Nri III ber:19111.3.............................
Loca(ion of Faun:
r-1
1W
Latitude ®' ©` ®" Longitude ©e l 46
_._._._........ - -
esign -Current--.-
'
Swine Capacity Population.
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to can
❑ arrow to Fee er
❑ Farrow to Finis
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Spray
Field rea
u sur ace ransreset ❑ Lagoon Area
Nurt+
i 'I
II
f
I161..:.::.::...:.... Vi ...s...:.:
❑o Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
t. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Ij Yes N❑
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a• If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? []Yes [:)No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ©Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify 1]VI'[1] ❑ Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
pYes ❑No
3. Were there any adverse 'impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & •rreatrucut
A. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure d Structure 5 Structure G
idemilter:
Freeboard (inches): ...............1C..............................22...............
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 CoWirrued on back

y
,,� Facility Number: 31-441 Date of hispection 9/27/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? []Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
[]Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
It. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
p Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
[]Yes
p No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
. p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
[]Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
[]No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
❑ No
21, Did the facility tail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
C! ' Na.�itilatiorfs,or' -deieieneft:s.wvere'Hated during. this 'vi'sit.' ; Vau; will ;rerei�e ut> further ;
.�.�.cor�'esparideitGc,abnutth�s:visit.�.�.�.�...............�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�..�....
/Hell
lagoons were completely nooaea Dy the Nb gape rear xiver. Lagoon fFi nas sutterea only minor aamage wEul one smari s A
area of wall that sloughed off into the lagoon. Lagoon 42 in back has suffered major damage with 5 large cuts averaging 3'
;s X 2' deep. Wall was not completely breached except in the areas down to about 19" freeboard line. Level has been dropped
Yv this point and will be repaired ASAP.
Reviewer/Inspector Name r711
,"€�:� .,..... � r: E .:'. i4?3s • 'i P �:�E'� :�:iiri;;IIi � ... �. ...s;t;:�,���. �: �:;� ���
r ;r •:,1,. ;ris... , ..Ma 1~oWle .,s�"i" ?i'" Ii"; i;,t,.:. :3. ;-;:.
Dean Hullkele:c,,:. xT r.. I;;:E,. .;1.=.:.: _::. t:=,.:.:r,. i;::
PRY, ,�,33..:�s�...isif!Sjff.xs',ilE::rt��l:+rlc�F!;IAka.:li,,b"w:,�E�,�ztt:sn:seaw„�°k..t�rtd. zvr;E':::.� �,.H,:.::rl:.: .��lii.i::.: f-!:I!-. s:';i:;ir?tiPii!'?a:r:..
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:

! ......... ....`?...::::`.:?:
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
s .'s ...E..: secs s S S i$ •�i. :.33;, ..
0 Other Agency•
, ..�3' ,�3i3
® Division of Water Quality
• 3'E'.: a: �. t. _ » 3„ ^---'^'^""s,.mxm
r
.:.1i. •
IIIIEE3
,?...??ii E73`
..':_ •.
Hoiatine Q Com laint 0 Follow-n of DIV ins ection Q Follow-u p of DSWC review Q Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection EZi24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered 1ACertified 0 Applied for Permit C3 Permitted 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: dot Count .
. ..................... nC,�.........fir!f.'XF:-................................................................... Y' ...... IJ.'1.u(.`...........'..r..................................... .........
Owner Name: ..................... ...t�faltr�.............,, .p,rt r,......... I............................ Phone No:... ` ! ;:..'i�a...,,.,.....................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:........,.,.....:,,............,................................ Phone No:..................................:................
MailingAddress :...... .Q....... SQ... 1.......:.................................................................. ^.,.Eu�.V.i�.�r �:....................... ........
` .., )...........
Onsite Representative:.......... ........ i em� ....... ... ........ .............. I.................. Integrator: ........ :ktlr............. ............................ I ........
......
CertifiedOperator-, .................................................. ...................... .......... I............................. Operator Certification Number ..........................................
Location of Farm:
h.. k;4�......:�.%......DA.... �...�`1G.. ..l..f :.�...MA............rmAL.af111).....sD .49................................................................................................. �
... ..... ...................................... ... .............
Latitude '. Longitude
Number of. Lagoons 1 Holding Pottds ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray. Field Area K
. s,�s�E.�:sa.,iEFSi??..
'1 i f ,.E.�i.....
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System -,�
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
d. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes Ed No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes
M No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
I$ No
❑ Yes
t] No
❑ Yes
'I] No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Continued on flack

Facility Number: 3% — 4
S.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
50 No
Structures (Lagoons,11olding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Cl Yesi�'o
Structure I Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 StruCture 5
StFUC•[urc
b
Identifier: Z
Freeboard(ft): .............. :. .......................... x.1.....................................,...........................................,..........................,.............,..................................
10.
Is Seepage observed from any of the structures'!
❑ Yes
No
11.
Is erosion, or any otlter threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed''
❑ Yes
,No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minitnum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
14 No
Waste ; ppiiratir�tt
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
(1 No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type .........MA�.� ... �tf�i1...........................G.dr......... W.i�,a_�........ . ..........................................................
J 1
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Ilan (AWMI'}?
❑ Yes
50%,o
17.
Does the Facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
52 Yes
❑ No
19.
is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
Cl Yes
No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
19Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onl►
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
DQ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AW,MI'?
❑ Yes
JX'No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
❑ Yes
'A No
0 No.violatiotn or de'ficiencie's were noted during this. visit.- You4ill receive no furtlier
coerespbbdeke i out this visit:
Comments(refer to.question #):::Explain any -YES answers and/or anf, recOmni eindations or any'other,commerits
I7s[' drawin s of facilit to better�ex lain�situatirinti: it (use additional cs as ncYestiarr `'`'•''"i ``'�3i i':`l`€'s lss �,f;'s :?:': _
IZ• 1 It* 4xr lox W4- heat, i-kab yam- ElC�[hr�J 4- 41v- evoOr� arrUs, Clot��illy 4— rt[�yj,-L d t , �
wvAl etn kcs(_ jrxjr+s ��U he P%wPa. C�t �t�lerji6'L 6" akt.Cx or►
is, U#,V ihjR_ C-R' O% is i th, l Q l rKvj"- five I {
zz. k- se "L� 19,L-7. th.,�ld 1 { far e= cro`�. CCYYC ' "?Kf�1 s(a�tel,w i* _ v
n-cov�d , eou �,. t i,Ja�}� d- saa l Sc� tics sl►aul � ��- Lt do�r�. con• OL. C-" ry--
x>��a >�. ►�:'�,•. �a�n. r�cGra��. C�1�1���� 1�� �a� I>�r►��.,Hor` �{rlC�-
7/25/97
Revicwerllns cetnr Name ' " _ _
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: F Date: 711��ci

5
::.::...:.:::.::F��3"�f:.ie?, ;�.::
.s
WC?Anlmal Feedlot''Q" elration Re�1ew°'
DS.
.. .... .. ,... n'. ..:w:d,y �.... ......:.. ....... ... ...
t ..... ... , Se.e �`.
�F ff
F
il i•
W 66dl t �Dn�; 4s�: 1:�!:i!s.'.�'.3! .
�.��.�s� U Ins
n imal;F v erat ,Ste ;'3'. •F Y.4 •
« F!
:sr. ..�":;!;:.•i3i:i:.,::�,,:,;!. P :�F.i !;i. r'is' f.F.. iFiFs•.f'.::!a:
t€q' . •s•it ,n:t°:e.'" 1 =r IY `:`'`.i� .. �'� s 5� , i « `f
� .. �i.?:.:.il .. s:. •-.s..x::x ..s..i?'i:?.!iis?�: �.. ".:'�: F:..iZ.ii�il`F,•!�F..F;,:..,fs:::,. sFt'€: .
® Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DW2 Inspection
D Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Faciiity Number 3 y
Dale of Inspection Ho
T€me of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
(ex:1.25 for I. hr .15 min)) Spent on Review L
® Certified ' ❑ Permitted
or Inspection Uncludes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: ...... . ....
. ..... ....... . ..... . ............... . ... .................. . ............... . . .... . ................ . ................
Farm Name: ». .f,.P.. .... 1^^............ .... ............ ....... ............. -_........ .»....... County:...-D..U.. L�,sA...... »»...._................ .C,A,�.r..�,..�
Land Owner Name:.... i' ,r .a �a.......... ... ,.r04 G.. ....._ .............. Phone No:. '~ ................. ...... ........... _.............. ...
FacilityConctact:....._.... .................... ....... ......... »............... .._y............ ide:.................._......
.. ................... Phone No:..........................................................
Mailing Address:...P..Q...».V4k y.........31...1........... ....... ......
....... ...... ... � .0 .�.s� 1t.L .r..- .................. g..�`�.1 ...
Onsite Representative:.. r�.. .k. ks. .A►..x.. v :c ....» ...........__
...,.........._.......... ....................
............... Integrator: .... �A� .x..�Num
Certified Operator:...........,........»......................................_......_........................».............,
Operator Certit3catioer:............ ................ ........ ....
Location of Farm:
Latitude EHI• 11 00 Longitude ©0 ®6 � µ
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
. 'n . ,:,. �.y:... �,sPr,...iFi'r•..
.•', . :....; �.: .. ... r. :, ... ; .. '.i.:iz :: �� T-',< .!R.p ;i:'R?i':" i'i:ii�$�w%.iJ.iy....... ?i[. .w '3'•i..
Desi n Current Desi Current;. Desi n Current
tic f!
.. .. ,s..l.." t:': '' ;.. -.d itk.i.? .t. i:... !i:,F. •4t.
w
..y..F li ,., lists, .. .. ault Cattl
'. •..:: ii...•».F.sF �::-��:;: '. �E.:=:�«rF.�:�Ca aCi Po ulation'� rY`, "s='Ca�M'ar€� �Pv�"uiation��:��_:'_��•� ��=i�.:l`x�;`�: aaci •;=Poulatin
. F �F `� a 3:
q_
Wean to Feeder Layer 5 ;i;?=; ❑ Dairy
;.,I:
Feeder to Finish b ❑Non-� Non -Layer I[] Non -Dairy
°` °4"Fi�i„;i:i«. 3' ''=3 f3! ' •sii„' is •s 9 .F.!. «FF:::!. r,••:i':!::i': ":::^. �: i:.':: is,., .. ,�
Farrow to Wean ..s,�,
of . .4!5F 'FFi.. i'.:• .'s .
i"n
FF ..:I A. ,ls . . tit F'e:
Farrow to Feeder <€; Tntai=€Design'F Capacity
. Fi! ' �F: i�il's$yH:. ..S FF FiP .. �i.
�' Farrow t F�msh :�:,'�� ..
--- --
--
__ .4~Ic R4FFP II.ff Tf�.FF ......._.,_,-........ .• .b °Tiit�al''SSL r� .S4(`Fe F:
Fig
.. .. .'':: i� • »id,s:,:i.!: ii:i;?: :•:s .t:ttsi:i,i't :i:,S:': ?:�: 9:. •.. &e F.❑ Other
F.n........; Ff 'fe iFE" •!'e.t..
�E�. ': '�»ki•!� •���}�.V.. ..?[�s:::. �&: sq. �•:�»-.;i;;'. %t-
iii'tt'r�F�i;
,: = pv.Number of:Lagoon"s"!`Ho))ltiing; odds []Subsurface Drains Present .;;;ill€€ 'N
l:is,s:ill'n 33�.sij
F . i� �sl ." ,s .3.6 z � �'� '(iF �i��,l s �� 'F:' ,E,€ �`t' :: e::.•ii: �(, , 'I('. _. �! ::f ' i A.;.:.. Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
:li':linin's..Y. ',:F&;a ?F;N 3:i-.Ye..fi: ._.x.:� in d l'.E��..3E:. 's • f4z •n ' n . " • RIM . ' 3',' '::s �``:n's::;. °..
S5
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4130197 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes Al No
❑ Yes ® No
❑Yes 0No
❑ Yes 91 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes Cj No
Continued on bark

Facility Number: Z»I..... —. y.q.4
6, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
t&No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
MNo
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
[--]Yes
ELNo
5
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
ELNo
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
. &......».. .: ........ _......................... ............................ ...........................
..........»....
14. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
KNo
It. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
® Yes
❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
ELYes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
,ET -No
Wastc &UP11c tq {an
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
9LNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type „s.............. s:.axars_.......... .............. .. CA. �.............x�... ................. ..........
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
I&No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for ]and application?
❑ Yes
9No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
99 Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
&No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
KNo
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
Fpr Cerljffid Facilities Only
❑ Yes
KNo
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
9[No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
IN No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
RLYes
❑ No
aminents (refer to'queshon. #Fiiplain' any YES'answers and/or,any,erecommcndations or any. otlier=caminents:
Use drawings of facili to better ex Taro situations use additional es as nec'ess���f €
. .� 3. p .�.�.. ,= ii :"S i• � F a i)
r .�_h %_Ll ({� L 0C �^• La vti Ask p, ` •tt. r ��i
G v+ pr �., way v ti y �+"'F.R..� �-v •^-. 0 ., tnld� G f+ f 6 4 f-L, I D Q �+-j 1ti
v► I 1 a V C� �Qi�r ^'� r ram_ �] l� , u I-- t v e 'F .T ..f � u � f� 0- l 1 L .S€ E 0 C f
1n I Jt v. V� � 1 Q n
W�r I* O Yt � �' t �� p� G O [� R yr-e+-d S �-fi V'`?/� �S �:'�'3 �L.Q-p�, ■ ..ti r.�l � i [ d
16 ` W o r 7L a •� O r+`� f �- .1 w �y a-3 i .^ `7 �-r ^,,6F CLVL. .
tq • n w� v S Y G e �-r�--'►•� @ i w•. iz S I G c r C3 D� '^'" ►J "ten V Y e
St a�di ra v��•�s,��ke. l oar
�.�. 1., � yd►t � ..
Reviewer/Inspector Name
��:.::..:.:::...,.,:., :.. : ,,....� .. ,� - 3 €.• ,.ram°--•k..-€�'�t�;i� '� •'�'",°. y;
.' � .eke. � �ya�..-. .. ... _ , $ "$�:�3 '� "' �'�. f< . "� 3i ii Yi�i;k:i:i'.:i°?'J�':p3ny � ! tt�N����3�'i:'i€�E€�a 3k :�
n •H.e �"�!�F1?ilei.•f-••,.R1F�� �• �3 3i 3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
)'
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

0
0.
r • r
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. TI
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 8 - S - S , 1995
Time: [b f o
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address:
County:
Integrator M P H `� _ Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location: tQ C 5 R 1 5 1 ....- t F�, �„ �►� -t C
14 y 7 1_ -- ...
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: v ' _4= 'P' n'S�+"4
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW F-'��
Latitude: 3 4 ° ISO " Longitude: _71 ° 5 ' 442 Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Y�or No Actual Freeboard: _2_Ft. — Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes 0 �S
Was any erosion observed? Yes or Vo
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop (s) being utilized: _ 22g c- r %
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? es r No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes of(s
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes ord If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
is c `7 �A In a1-� v 1�
Inspector Name
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.

Vf Ll .l'i i JI AID ❑ICrRI V-I-, - VJU I- a,.. � 1 ?-I l,. `"CJ V'-i i,� nu�y 1 ��� 1•: :•W r
Site Requires immediate Attention
Facility ' • t N umbe
SITE VISITATION RECORD
ATE: 7- I -L , 1995
Owner: e t �o ut Farm Name:
County: l ja ykitQ- op} .Z-
Agent Visiting Site n ker,T Phone:
Operator: -- Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address: F
A 4 -f NC, ro
Mailing Address: ' . .. - --
Type of Operation: Swine _ L Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
Latitude: G '" Longitude: o
Type of Inspection. Gfound „ Aerial --
is Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Ye$ or (0 Actual Freeboard: - Feet Inches
For facilities with more than one lagoon, please address the other• lagoons' freeboard under the
comments section.
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? c8 oar No Was there erosion of the dam?: Yes or No
Is adequate land available for land application? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Additional Comments.
R - - I
Fax to (919) 715-a559 Sipawre of Agent

[7
Site Requires Immediate Attentio :
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: `rf , 1995
Time: �..��3 5
Farm Name/Owner:�JLO
Mailing Address: ?z7
County: D�'_ ul,'•�
Integrator: W (Akek, Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone: (I(O�
Physical Address/Locadon:
Type of Operation: Swine `� Poultry Cattle '
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: G �V
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: P9Longitude: Elevation: Feet
F Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately -I Foot + 7 inches) 0 or No Actual Freeboard: -2-- -Ft. �! Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or i Was any erosion observed?�9 or No
Is adequate land available for spray? or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SC 'nimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS B1ue'Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man -trade devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: V
Inspector Name _
Z4 - -
S ignature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.