310259_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

Division of Water Quality II
Facility Number 5 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit .0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine Complaint O Follow up O Referral Emergency O Other El Denied Access
,%l
Date of Visit: L;��/y �-� Arrival Time: ZZJ I / Departure Time: /�// o.,-I County: .2/✓ Region:
Farm Name: �491_L/ -AP 9_'V Ae//t' i Owner Email:
Owner Name: o D f ✓% 2 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Phone No:
!2 kSao.
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = . = Longitude: = o = , =
Design Current Design Current ` Design' �7
Swine - - Capacity Population '- Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle :Capacity Pi
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other - -
Dry Poultry
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts, to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
0
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes /Z No El NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes /[�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: —% Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment T%
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
Structure 5
❑ NA ZNE
❑NANE
Structur 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA PeNE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) r�
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ yes ❑ No ❑ NA y� NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA LdNE
maintenance/improvement? T
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA//--
� NE
ElExcessive Pending ElHydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA IFINE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA,/
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ yes [I No [INn I�.T^" NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? [-IYesEl No El NA Tye NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ZNE
IComments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers. and/or any recommendations or any other comments. I
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
—�EL'6zvfD C�Pc a�� L:pcc. F L,�os /1/oT O.✓ yC/f_AD
Reviewer/Inspector Name aw( Phone: 19
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Qe ,� Date: /47 ¢
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents J
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ElYes [INo [INA (Q NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
E
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis [I Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Cert'2caii0n
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
,.�_/NE
l� NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
/,,,_�/,NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
1(J/NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
/�/
Other Issues
/
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
leNo
❑ yes )ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes No
El NA
El NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes 2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments and/or
Page 3 of 3 12128104