310251_HISTORICAL_20171231

CAROLINA
Department
Qua

c- N
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE 2/8/2016
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): I Pete Smith Farm FN: 31-251
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) _
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft'
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design
18.Sinches
19.0 inches
0.5 inches
68850 ft3
21458 gallons
180 days
94947 ft3
h. current herd # 2880 certified herd # 2880
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 94947 ft'
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 12/11/2015
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
Oft3
41854.2 ft3
170545 gallons
2.03 Ibs/1000 gal.
389.8 lbs. PAN
2/8/2016

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR./24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure ID: Pete Smith Farm
2. Structure ID:
3. Structure ID:
4. Structure ID:
5. Structure ID:
6. Structure ID:
n. lines 1 +2+3+4+5+6=
line m = 389.8 lb PAN
line m = lb PAN
line in = lb PAN
line m = lb PAN
line m = lb PAN
line m = lb PAN
389.8 lb PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PCRInn nn NnT I IAT rim nS Tn WHICH PAN CANNOT RE APPLIED DURING THIS 3D DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(Ib/acre)
L TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
5709
psl
Small Grain
16.40
25.00
410.0
9/1-3/31
5709
ps2
Small Grain
14.60
25.00
365.0
9/1-3/31
5709
ps3
Small Grain
4.60
25.00
115.0
9/1-3/31
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 890.0 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY S FDA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w.
Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) =
389.8 lb.
PAN
x.
Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) =
890.0 lb.
PAN
y.
Overall PAN balance (w - x) =
500 lb.
PAN
PDA (30 Day) 2121100
2/8/2016

Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00 2/8/2016

:�)w.<I'-
Nutrient Man
This plan has been prepa
Pete Smith Farm (31-251)
Harold Smith
677 NC 11 E
Pink Hill, NC 28572
252-568-3739
Type of Plan: Nitrogen
Owner/Manager/Producer ,
I (we) understand and agree t
procedures established in this
waste utilization plan for the 1
Required Specifications conce
this plan:
Signature (manager or
This plan meets the minimum st
Agriculture - Natural Resources
adopted by the Soil and Water (
Plan Approved By:
Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
for:
04-25-2014
This plan has been developed by:
Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Agriment Services, Inc.
PO Box 1096
Beulaville, NC 28518
25 -26
eveloper Signature
with Manure Only
the specifications and the operation and maintenance
utrient management plan which includes an animal
rm named above. I have read and understand the
ping animal waste management that are included with
VZ �,-4ei
Date
Date
and specifications of the U.S. Department of
ation Service or the standard of practices
tion Commission.
Signature
V/-zs
Date
644273 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 04-25-201.4 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
be supplied from the
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish
animal Swine Finishing
storage capacities of
Lagoon Liquid waste generated 2,669,760 gals/year by a 2,880
Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
approximately 180 days.
Estimated Poundslof
Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
4812
Incorporated
I 5775
Injected
I 5775
Irrigated
4812
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual
Applied
PAN
Ohs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
4,812
5584
-772
3,098,079
-428,319
Year 2
4,812
5817
1,005
3,227,232
-557,472
Note: M source ID, S mean:
* Max. Available PAN is calcul
644273 Datab
s) identified in the plan for this source.
Source Page I of I

FACILITY NUMBER 31-251
FARM NAME: PETE SMITH FARb
OWNER NAME: HAROLD SMITH
DESIGN CAPACITY: 2880 FEEDEI
12/14/2000
THIS PLAN IS A REVISION OF Tf
PLAN DEPICTS THE WETTABLE
CALCULATION TABLES.
Narrative
TO FINISH
6/24/97 PLAN COMPLETED BY JOHNNY LANIER. THIS
'-RES ON THE FARM AND DISPLAYS THE SAME IN THE
FIELD PS2 WILL UTILIZE A HONEYWAGON TO ACCESS I 1 OF THE 14.55 ACRES IN THE
FIELD (SEE HONEYWAGON AGREEMENT). THE WETTABLE ACRE DET ASSUMES THIS
FIELD IS UTILIZED BY THE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM OWNED BY MR. SMITH. MR.
SMITH WANTED TO UTILIZE THE HONEYWAGON TO ACCESS MORE ACRES OF THIS FIELD
TO REMAIN IN A PASTURE SITUATION. HOWEVER, SOME OF THE ACREAGE WILL HAVE
TO BECOME A BERMUDA HAY ROTATION.
THE APPLICATION RATES FOR
SINCE MR. SMITH MOVES THE
PRODUCTION OF FORAGE.
THE APPLICATION WINDOWS D
OVERSEED. FOR GUIDANCE ON
TO GUIDANCE MEMO FROM NC:
ALL FIELDS MUST MEET MONIT,
MR. SMITH PLANS TO APPLY SW
ANALYSIS NOT TO EXCEED THE
4/25/2014
THIS PLAN CHANGES PS I AND
CORN/WHEAT/SOYBEANS.
UDA PASTURE ARE CONTROLLED GRAZED RATES
TO DIFFERENT PADDOCKS AND HAYS PART OF THE
HE PLAN ARE GENERAL IN REGARDS TO SMALL GRAIN
IE WINDOWS AND RATES MR. SMITHH MUST REVERT
(INCLUDED).
4G AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS WHEN USED.
WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH HIS SPECIFIC WASTE
)RAULIC LOADING OF THE SOILS.
TO HAY AND PS2(HONEYWAGON) TO
644273 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 04-25-2014 Narrative Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary �ofthe crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic
Yield estimates are also provided for each c op in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown,
where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
5709
PSI
16.36
7.44
N/A
Foreston
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagmss Hay
6.0 Tons
5709
PS2
14.55
14.55
N/A
Fores[on
Com, Grain
120 bu.
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
5709
PS3
4.57
1.99
N/A
Autryville
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: 35.48 23.98
7h 2.
LL . _
}+fr'
, wz;Potenhal°L'`eacl
rn
s +c_ "rs' .`L" i&.' ?2
a # z rvTechriicalGurdance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
one
< 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<= 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the root
zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(�28), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
644273 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed 4/252014
NOTE: Symbol w means user entered data.
PCs Page 1 of 1

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Vrnr 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
APpbG
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res.
(1bs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
Mara cA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Fby)
N
N
N
N
100D
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
-3709
PSI
$7
Foreston
16.36
7.44
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/3)
50
1 0
1 0
brig.
1 501
27.74
0.00
206.38
0.00
5709
PSI
S7
Foreston
16.36
7.44
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
274
0
0
Irrig.
274
152.01
0.00
1,130.95
0.00
5709
PS2
S7
Foreston
14.55
14.55
Com, Grain
120 bu.
2/15-6/30
137
0
20
brig.
117
64.91
0.00
944.43
0.00
5709
PS2
S7
Foreston
14.55
14.55
Wheat, Grain
55 but.
911-4/30
115
0
0
Irtig.
58
31.90
0.00
464.14
0.00
5709
PS3
S7
Autryville
4.571
1.99
Small Grain Overseed
1:0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
27.741
0.00
55.201
0.00
5709
PS3
S7
Auuyville
4.57
1.99
Hybrid Bennudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
269
0
0 1
brig. 1
2691
149.24
0.00
296.98
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
3,098.08
MEN
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
2,669.76
4dr'.
5r1NT .
Balance, 1000 gallons
-428.32
ti
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
I
0.00
Balance,[ons
963i'. sr,
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol' means user entered data.
644273 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 4/25/2014 WUT Page I of 2

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
APpbc
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Reqd
(lbs/A)
Comm
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
Qbs/A)
Res.
Qbs/A)
Appbc.
Method
Manua
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManumA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manua:
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5709
PSI
S7
Foreston
16.36
7.44
Small Grain Ovcmmd
1.0 Tons
1 10/1-3/31
1 50
0
0
1 brig.
50
27.74
0.001
206.381
0.00
5709
PSI
S7
Foreston
16.36
7.44
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
274
0
0
brig.
274
152.01
0.00
1,130.95
0.00
5709
PS2
S7
Foreston
14.55
14.55
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
9/14/30
115
0
0
Irrig.
58
31.90
0.00
464.14
0.00
5709
PS2
S7
Foreston
14.55
14.55
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9/15
133
0
0
brig.
133
73.79
0.00
1,073.58
0.00
5709
PS3
S7
Autryville
4.57
1.99
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-351
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
27.74
0.00
55.20
0.00
5709
PS3
S7
Aunyville
4.571
1.99
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1.9/30
269
0
0
Irrig.
269
149.24
0.00
296.98
0.00
Total Applied,-1000 gallons
3;227-23
M. k
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
2,669.76
ME
Balance, 1000 gallons
-557.47
um
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced,tons
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
644273 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 4/25/2014 WUT Page 2 of 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies
with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in
runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to
receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one application
event. I
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
5709
PSI.
Foreston
0.50
1.0
5709
PS2
Foreston
I
0.50
1.0
5709
PS3
Autryville
0.60
1.0
644273 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed 4/25/2014 IAF Page I of 1
NOTE: Symbol • means user entered data.

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized fo i crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suite I ility for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should betaken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
Ib/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gaVac
I
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder
-Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
1 150
14.69
32.351
64.70
97.06
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
1 300
29.38
16.18
32.35
48.53
Soybean 40 bu
1 160
15.67
30.33
60.66
90.99
-------------- '------------ '------------' --------
644273 Database Version 4.1
Sludge Page 1 of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in th lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be
storage capacity of the facility. If the
capacity, this indicates that the plan c
If available storage capacity is negati,
storage volume of the structure. Eithi
in the waste utilization plan is inconsi
Available Waste Storage
eater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
iailable storage capacity is greater than the design storage
s for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
ent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Source Name I Swine Feeder -Finish La 'oon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date 9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
I
1
51
I
2
56
I
3
76
1
4
111
1
5
125
I
6
160
1
7
149
1
8
157
1
9
166
1
10
159
1
11
149
1
12
136
2
1
123
2
f 2
115
2
3
128
2
4
178
2
5
180
2
( 6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
154
2
11
131
2
12
105
* Available Storage Capacity is
---- - - -------------- ------------------ ---------
644273 Database Version4.1
as of the end of each month.
Date Printed: 04-25-2014 Capacity Page 1 of 1

Required SP
1. Animal waste shall not
manmade conveyances,
operation or land applii
water is prohibited.
2. There must be docume
either owns or has an a
properly apply the was
properly dispose of the
agreement with a land(
allowing him/her the ui
responsibility of the ow
update of the Nutrient
operation, increase in t
receiving crop type, or
For Animal Waste Management
surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
t application, or direct discharge during
. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
Cation in the design folder that the producer
reement for use of adequate land on which to
If the producer does not own adequate land to
mste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
vner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
of the land for waste application. It is the
er of the waste production facility to secure an
lanagement Plan when there is a change in the
number of animals, method of application,
vailable land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict jthe rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be a
per year. Waste may be
acre per year but less th
strips are installed whey
Office Technical Guide
)lied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
pplied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
y 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
andard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is t
will be soil incorporates
applied to conservation
broadcast provided the
to flooding (see "Weatt
be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
illed crops or grassland, the waste may be
pplication does not occur during a season prone
r and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
--------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ---
644273 Database Version 4.1 1 Date Printed: 4/25/2014
------ -- -----
Specification Pave 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in! order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not
events, or when the soil
9. Animal waste shall be a
that the crop is not covf
growth. The potential h
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste s
planted crops on soils i
loading rates on these s
winter cover crop plan
be applied more than 3
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility
the following: The oute
applied from a lagoon 1
50 feet from any reside
other than swine waste
shall not be applied clo
12. Animal waste shall not
applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
rface is frozen.
flied on actively growing crops in such a manner
d with waste to a depth that would inhibit
salt damage from animal waste should also be
ill not beapplied in fall orwinter for spring
th a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
Is should be held to a minimum and a suitable
d to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
days prior to planting of the crop or forages
ted on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with
perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
at is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
ial property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
•om facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
r that 25 feet to perennial waters.
applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by thel landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
----------------- ---------
644273 Database Version 4.1
--- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
Date Printed: 4/25/2014 Specification Pape 2

15. Animal waste shall not
or wetlands by a dischf
applied to prior toner
approved as a land app
waste shall not be appli
into water courses, and
applied at agronomic r;
from the site.
16. Domestic and industri
sinks, etc., shall not be
system.
17. A protective cover of ap
disturbed areas (lagoon
shall be fenced, as neces
trees, shrubs, and other
considered appropriate.
accessible. Berms and s
evidence of erosion, lealr
18. If animal production at
owner is responsible for
which will eliminate the
erosion.
19. Waste handling struct
on a regular basis to p
maintenance checklist
discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
D or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
cropland provided the fields have been
ition site by a "technical specialist". Animal
on grassed waterways that discharge directly
other grassed waterways, waste shall be
i in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
;ed into the animal waste management
riate vegetation will be established on all
inkments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
ly species, etc., are limited to areas where
oon areas should be kept mowed and
ures should be inspected regularly for
or discharge.
e facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
Staining and implementing a "closure plan"
)ssibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
t breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
Id be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers
elevations of the tempt
treatment lagoons. Pu
between the markers.
storage volume for wa!
644273 Database Version 4.1
be installed to mark the top and bottom
storage (pumping volume) of all waste
g shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
rker will be required to mark the maximum
►rage ponds.
Date Printed: 4/25/2014 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested wi
at least annually at crol
shall be the rate-determ
waste to be applied bast
application rate than a i
soils shall be monitored
these metals approach e
maintained for optimun
records shall be kept fol
application records shal
Waste application recor
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be di!
regulations.
644273 Database Version4.1
hin 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
ning nutrient, unless other restrictions require
1 on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
itrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
ind alternative crop sites shall be used when
cessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
crop production. Soil and waste analysis
a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
be maintained for a minimum of three years.
.s for all other waste shall be maintained for five
of in a manner that meets North Carolina
---------------------------------------------------- ----- ----------------------- ------
Date Printed: 4/25/2014 Specification Page 4

Corn 1: CP, Mineral Soil,
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally
Review the Official Variety "green be
yielding variety with the characteristic
populations should be determined by 1
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potas
planting. When planting early in cool,
plants. An accepted practice is to appl
starter and one-half the remaining N b
days after emergence. The total amour
fertilizer program, the recommended I
planting. Plant samples can be analyze
of the corn. Timely management of wi
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral
Adaptation: Effective artificial
provided for these soils.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudag
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to prod
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly,
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use abc
potassium and micronutrients to apply
the establishment year in split applica
Ib/ac N annually in split applications,
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. I
of Pastures and Forages in North Carc
extension agent for assistance.
Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): PS2
anted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
0 and information from private companies to select a high
needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
um recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
iet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
20-30 Ibs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
Lind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
tassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
ds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): PSI
Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
MUST be in place to achieve Realistic Yield Expectations
;s sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
rated quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
e full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced V to 1.5' in row.
60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
replant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
ns in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
ually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
er to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
to for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
----------------------------------------- --- -- ---------------------------------------
644273 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 04-25-2014 Crop Note Page 1 of 3

Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudag
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to prod
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly,:
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use abc
potassium and micronutrients to apply
the establishment year in split applicai
lb/ac N annually in split applications,
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. F
of Pastures and Forages in North Carc
extension agent for assistance.
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil,
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley s
October 15-November 20. For barley,
each week seeding is delayed beyond
seeding rate modifications in the cum
initial seeding rate by at least 10% wl
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all tl
essential. Review the NCSU Official
select a high yielding variety with the
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phospl
this time. The remaining N should be
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil,
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley s
October 15-November 20. For barley,
each week seeding is delayed beyond
seeding rate modifications in the cure
initial seeding rate by at least 10% wl
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all it
essential. Review the NCSU Official'
select a high yielding variety with the
than 30 Ibs/acre N at planting. Phospl
this time. The remaining N should be
The following crop note applies to field(s): PS3
Moderately Well Drained.
;s sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
rated quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
e full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of time, phosphorus,
replant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 Ib/ac N in
ns in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
wally in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
er to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
fa for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
The following crop note applies to field(s): PSI
)uld be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
dant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
to optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
it NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
n planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
:se small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
ariety "green book" and information from private companies to
haracteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
rus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
pplied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): PS3
leachable
dd be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
tnt 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
•iety "green book" and information from private companies to
iracteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
is and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
flied during the months of February -March.
- - - - -
------------------
-----
-
644273 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 04-25-2014 Crop Note Page 2 of 3

Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil,
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the sees
optimum time. See the seeding rates t
"Small Grain Production Guide". AI:
no -till. Adequate depth control when
"green book" and information from p.
characteristics needed for your area a
Phosphorus and potash recommender
should be applied during the months i
samples can be analyzed during the g
management of diseases, insects and
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal
Double -crop soybeans should be plane
When no -tilling soybeans in small gra
plant populations. Review the NCSU
companies to select a high yielding va
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. I
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and
recommended for the soybeans can be
nitrogen and are normally grown with
N are sometimes made at planting to I
during the growing season to monitor
weeds and insects is essential for prof
The following crop note applies to field(s): PS2
rated from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
e for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
nting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
ite companies to select a high yielding variety with the
conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting.
a soil test can also be applied at this time. The remaining N
February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant
ling season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely
are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): PS2
Mineral Soil, low -leachable
as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
Ficial Variety "green book" and information from private
ty with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
rease the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
equate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
iplied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre
mote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
)le double crop soybean production.
644273 Database Version 4.11 Date Printed: 04-25-2014 Crop Note Page 3 of 3

4/25/2014 11:33:30 AM, 1:300

HAROLD SMITH (PETE SMITH FA I
/
HS2
PS3Psi It
---
I ,
IN
IN
`\ =--T. i I` i Tom`. • ` 1—�� //
crvP rrMN•oW \ • ` . / " I`,• i �\ \\ ,1\\ i/ �` `\'`�\ �, i i // @'
1 \I I I / I , 1 \ \ IN
IN ,NNN
/ p
V LANE
" LANE 6:
LANE l' LANE 4 LANE 5 `
GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET )
1 inch - 200 It

ASS 31 o2S!
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
12-14-2000
This plan has been prepared for:
Pete Smith Farm
Harold Smith
677NC1!E
Pink Hill, NC 28572
252-568-3739
This plan has been developed by:
Ronnie G. Kennedy.1r.
Agriment Services, Inc.
PO Box 1096
Beulaville, NC 28518
252-rr
Dedloper Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required
Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted
by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: 1 1
--
Ltnical Speciali ignature Date
317039 Database Version 1.05 Date Pri: 1 nted2-14-2000 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with thi' plan will be supplied from the
following, source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 2,669,760 gals/year
by a 2,880 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This
roduction facili has waste stora a ca acities of a roximatel 180 days
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
6153
Incoip_orated
10567
Injected
11637
Irrigated
6688
_ Actual PAN Applied
Year 1
6702
Notes:
In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
[s'
- - - --- ----- - b Version - - - - - - - 1 -1 -- - --------- --- - -g---------
256139 Database Version lA5 Date Printed: 12-14-2000 Source Pa e t

%I Narrative
FACILITY NUMBER 31-251
FARM NAME: PETE SMITH FARM
OWNER NA -ME: HAROLD SMITH
DESIGN CAPACITY: 2880 FEEDER TO FINISH
THIS PLAN IS A REVISION OF THE 6/24/97 PLAN COMPLETED BY JOHNNY LANIER. THIS
PLAN DEPICTS THE WETTABLE ACRES ON THE FARM AND DISPLAYS THE SAME IN THE
CALCULATION TABLES.
FIELD PS2 WILL UTILIZE A HONEYWAGON TO ACCESS I OF THE 14.55 ACRES IN THE
FIELD (SEE HONEYWAGON AGREEMENT). THE WETTABLE ACRE DET ASSUMES THIS
FIELD IS UTILIZED BY THE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM OWNED BY MR. MR. SMITH
WANTED'CO UTILIZE THE HONEYWAGON TO ACCESS MORE ACRES OF THIS FIELD TO
REMAIN IN A PASTURE SITUATION. HE DOES HAVE ENOUGH LAND VIA THE TRAVELER
SYSTEM FOR HIS OPERATION, HOWEVER, SOME OF THE ACREAGE WILL HAVE TO
BECOME A BERMUDA HAY ROTATION.
THE APPLICATION RATES FOR BERMUDA PASTURE ARE CONTROLLED GRAZED RATES
SINCE MR. SMITH MOVES THE COWS TO DIFFERENT PADDOCKS AND HAYS PART OF THE
PRODUCTION OF FORAGE.
THE APPLICATION WINDOWS IN THIS PLAN ARE GENERAL IN REGARDS TO SMALL
GRAIN OVERSEED. FOR GUIDANCE ON THE WINDOWS AND RATES MR SMITH MUST
REVERT TO GUIDANCE MEMO FROM NCSU (INCLUDED).
ALL FIELDS MUST MEET MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS WHEN USED.
MR. SMITH PLANS TO APPLY SWINE WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH HIS SPECIFIC WASTE
ANALYSIS NOT TO EXCEED THE HYDRAULIC LOADING OF THE SOILS.
256139 Database Version 1.0 Date Printed: 12-14-2000 Narrative Page 1

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland
needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper
timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other
by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to
supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included.
A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the
manure generated by the operation. Animal operations that generate liquid waste and utilize waste storage facilities (lagoons or holding ponds) may apply more or
less waste in any given year than is annually generated by the facility. In order to determine whether the plan adequately utilizes the waste produced by the facility,
the storage capacity table included in this plan should be reviewed to ensure that the design capacity of the storage facility is not exceeded during the planning period.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being utilized.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used to balance the
nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited
so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Wo.tn T T4ili,at;n. Tahla Year I
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Ave
Use.
Acres
Cron,
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applie.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
N
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrias
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
- Ibs/A
1000
l/A
tons
1000 RAIS
tons
5709
PSI
S7
Foreston
16.41
7.41
Barnudagrass Pasture
•6.0
1 Tons
1 *3/15.10/15
• 2551
0
0
1 Inig
1 255
101.81
0.0
757.4
0.0
5709
PSla
S7
Foreston
16.41
7.41
Cereal/Annual Rye
1.5
1 Tons
'9/15-3/31
75
1 0
0
1 irrip
75
2991
0.0
222.8
0.0
O/S, Craw, 4/7
Harvest
5709
PS2
S7
Foreston
14.61
11.0
1 Bermuda Pasture
*6.0LT
ns
•3115-10/15
' 255
0
0
Irtig
255
101.8
0.0
11119.9
0.0
5709
PS2a
S7
Foreston
14.6
11.0
Cereal/Annual Rye
1.5ns
•9/15-3/31
75
0
0
Irrig
75
29.9
0.0
329.3
0.0
O/S, Ornza, 4'7
Harvest
57091
PS3
1 87
1 Autryville
4.61
2.0
1 Bermudass Pasture
"5.5
'Pons
•3/15-10/15
' 235
0
0
Ini
235
93.8
0.0
186.7
0.0
------------- - 1.0 - to Printed: : --- - 00 WUT Page 1
256139 Database Version 1.05 Date Printed: 12-t4-2000 g

Waste Utilization Table
"^'
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
12eq'd
Comm. Res.
Fen. (lbs�A)
Nutrient
Applied
Manure Liquid Solid.
PA Manure Manure
Nutrient Applied Applied
Applied (acre) (alto)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Marano
Applied
(Field)
bs/
1000 Is
59.6
tons
0.0
Source Total Use. WRYEApplic.
Tract Field I.D. Soil Serita ACTe Acres Cr N
5709 PS3a S7 Am ills 46 2.0 Cercd/Annual Rye 75
Applic. 1000
N N Method lbs'A I/A tons
0 0 Imi 75 29.9 0.0
O/S, Crraze, 4/7
Harvest
-
Totatt lied, 1000 llotts
2,675
2,670
Lagoon Liquids
Total produced, 1000 tallea,
Balance 1000 gallons
-6
Total Ap lied, tong
0
0
Manure Solids
Total Produced,tons
0
. -
Bala= tons
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol — means leased, olltmvise, owned. 2. Symbol' means user entered data.
------ — - ---- -- - --- — — — — — Date Printed: 12-14-2000 — WUT Page 2
256139 Database Version L05

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration
rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate
that will not result in nmoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be
applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that
each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Traa
Field
Soil Seiea
Application Ra[e
inches<how
Application Amount
mcius
5709
PSI
Foreston
0.50
0.96
5709
PSIa_
Foreston
0.50
0.96
5709
PS2
ForeAon
0.50
0.96
5709
PS23
Foreston -
0.50
0.96
5709
PS3
Aimywlle
0.60
0.72
5709
PS3a
AutrYvillc
0.60
0.72
256139 Database Version 1.05 Date Printed: 12-14-2000 IAF Page l

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an esti hate of the number of acres needed for
1 sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates
shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first b: evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a
concerts.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop,
Maximum
PA-N Rate
Iblac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 ac
Minimum Acres
1 5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
1 10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
1 15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
1 150
13.171
36.08
72.16
108.24
Hay 6 ton RY.E.
300
26.341
18.04
36.08
54.12
Soybean 40 bu
o 160
14.05
1 33.83
1 67,651
101.48
256139 Database Version 1.05 Date Printed: 12-14-2000 Sludge Page I

:1 The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
sate capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of
accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. This indicates that the planned
application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage
capacity.
Available Waste Storage Canacitv
Source Name
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
SlartDate_
9/15
180
Flan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
100
1
2
101
_ 1
3
102
l
4
100
1
i
98
1
6
123
_ 1
7
148
1
8
173
_ l
9
180
_ l
10
178
_ 1
11
177
1
12
146
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
-

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design told that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use
of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre
per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied toconservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
---- - --------- -- - - ------------------ --- - ----- ----------------- ---- - ----------- --
256139 Database Version 1.05 Date Punted: 12-14-2000 SpeciScation Page I

method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted croplandprovided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied ar agronomic rates in a manner that causes not runoff or drift
from site.
---------3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2MI. 9 Database Version 1.05 Date Printed: 12-14-2000 Spxification Page 2

16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
System.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored 'and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
---- - -- ---------- - ---- - -.--------------- -- --u-- ---- -- -------------- - k- --page- ----
2561;9 Database Version 1.0� Date Printed: 12-14-2000 Sp; cification Page 3

metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for
optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall
be maintained for a minimum of three years. Waste application records
for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
256139 Database Version 1.05 Date Printed: 12-14-2000 Specification Page 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): PS 1, PS2
Bermudagrass CP, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Effective artificial drainage MUST be in place to achieve Realistic Yield Expectations
provided for these soils.
In the Coastal Plater, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind.
For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of
30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions.
Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced ]'to 1.5' in row. For
broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium
and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 Ib/ac N in the
establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N
annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and
Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): PS la, PS2a
Cereal/Annual Rye Overseeded — Grazed
CEREAL RYE
The cereal rye should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth. The
most consistent, stands are obtained from drilling rye into short (less than 3 inches tall) bermudagrass sod.
If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation
with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds should be 1.5 times the
rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda prior to August
31. An application of 50 Ibs/acre of Plant Available N (PAN) may be applied between September 15 and
October 30. An additional 50 lbs.acre of PANfmay be applied in February -March. If rye growth is
harvested on time and does not significantly shade the bermuda, PAN rates for the subsequent bermuda
crop are based on realistic yields of bermuda. A harvest is required prior to heading or April 7, which ever
comes first. This is necessary to minimize the potential for shading bermuda and reducing its yields. The
PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda overseeded with cereal rye must be reduced by 25%.
ANNUAL R.YEGRASS
Annual ryegrass should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth.
The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling ryegrass into short (less than 3 inches tall)
bermudagrass sod. if drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short bermuda sod followed
by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds
should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the
bermuda prior to August 31. An application of 50 Ibs/acre of PAN may be applied between September 15
and October 30. An additional 50 lbs. acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If additional PAN
------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------
256tas Database Version L0 Date Printed: 12-14-2000 Crop Note Page I

is applied to the ryegrass in April -May, the PAN rate for the bermuda must be reduced by a corresponding
511-1 amount. This is necessary because ryegrass growth during April -May will reduce bermuda yields and
shorten the time bermuda can fully utilize the N. A harvest is required by ]reading or April 7, which ever -
comes first to prevent shading of emerging bermuda during April -May period. To favor the production of
the bermuda, additional harvests of ryegrass will be required when the ryegrass canopy reaches 12 to 15
inches height. The PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda overseeded with annual ryegrass must be
reduced by 25%.
The following crop note applies to field(s): PS3
Bermudagrass: CP, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind.
For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of
30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions.
Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced ]'to 1.5' in row. For
broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of time, phosphorus, potassium
and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 Ib/ac N in the
establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N
annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and
Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): PS3a
Cereal/Annual Rye Oveseeded —Grazed
CEREAL ICa,,
The cereal rye should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth. The
most consistent stands are obtained from drilling rye into short (less than 3 inches tall) bermudagrass sod.
If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation
with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds should be 1.5 times the
rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda prior to August
31. An application of 50 lbs/acre of Plant Available N (PAN) may be applied between September 15 and
October 30. An additional 50 lbs.acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If rye growth is
harvested on time and does not significantly shade the bermuda, PAN rates for the subsequent bermuda
crop are based on realistic yields of bermuda. A harvest is required prior to heading or April 7, which ever
comes first. This is necessary to minimize the potential for shading bermuda and reducing its yields. The
PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda overseeded with cereal rye must be reduced by 25%.
ANNUAL RYEGRASS
Annual ryegrass should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth.
The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling ryegrass into short (less than 3 inches tall)
Date Prin-t--: —12-- --2000 ----------CropNo-te--P-aga -.--zscrs9 a-Vrsion --
-----
-

bermudagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short bermuda sod followed
by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds
should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the
bermuda prior to August 31. An application of 50 Ibs/acre of PAN may be applied between September 15
and October 30. An additional 501bs. acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If additional PAN
is applied to the ryegrass in April -May, the PAN rate for the bermuda must be reduced by a corresponding
amount. This is necessary because ryegrass growth during April -May will reduce bermuda yields and
shorten the time bermuda can fully utilize the N. A harvest is required by heading or April 7, which ever
comes first to prevent shading of emerging bermuda during April -May period. To favor the production of
the bermuda, additional harvests of ryegrass will be required when the ryegrass canopy reaches 12 to 15
inches height. The PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda overseeded with annual ryegrass must be
reduced by 25%.
��>1
----------------------------------
256139 Database Version 1.0 Date Printed: 12-14-2000 Crop Note Page 3

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Rlimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 25, 2007
Harold J Smith
Pete Smith Farm
677 NC 11 E
Pink Hill, North Carolina 28572
Chi'1Su6jdcf. (Sludge Survey Testing Dates
2 6 2007 Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310251
IDN a Pete Smith Farm
_ imal Waste Management System
--Duplin County
Dear Mr. Smith:
The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge survey information on January 2,
2007. With your results, Jonathan Miller with Agriment Services, Inc. requested an extension in
the frequency of the sludge survey for Lagoon HS2 at the Pete Smith Farm facility. Due to the
amount of treatment volume available and in anticipation of this facility receiving renewal under
the State COC, the Division agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until 2008. The results of
the 2008 sludge survey are to be submitted with the Annual Certification Form that will be due
on March 1, 2009.
If your facility does not receive renewal of its Animal Waste Management System COC under
the State permit and must, or chooses, to renew under the NPDES permit, then a sludge survey
will be required in 2007 and must be reported on or before March 1, 2008. This would be
necessary in order to meet the requirement for a sludge survey in the year of permit renewal.
Please note that we have received your application for renewal under the State COC and this
condition is just in the event your application is withdrawn or denied.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please contact me at
[e-mail] or by phone at [phone].
(Sincerely; /%
y./A" ).
Duane Leith
Environmental Engineer
cc: LWilmington Regional -Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Jonathan Miller, Agriment Services, Inc.
AFO Central Files
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Internet: w .ncwateroualitv.ore Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC.27604
An Equal OpporlunitylAffirmafive Action Employer— 50 % Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
I�` Carolina
Vvatura!!y
Telephone:
[phone]
Fax 1:
[phone]
Fax 2:
[phone]
Customer Service:
[phone]

l
Operator: H8D Smith Farm
'
County:__ ________ ________ ________________,Duplin
Date:____ ________ ________ ________ ________=
O6/03/04
Dist.to nearest residence (other than owner):
755 ft.
sows (farrow to finish):===
sows (farrow to feeder): eder):___
head (finishing only):====_ ________ ________,
2880
sows (farrow to wean):====_
head (wean to feeder):====_
Ave. Live Weight for other operations(lbs.)=>
Storage volume for sludge accum. (cu. ft.):=>
Treatment Volume (min. 1 cu. ft./Ib.)=======>
1.0
25 Year - 24 Hour Rainfall (in.)============>
7.5
Rainfall in excess of evaporation (in.)=====>
7,0
Drainage area of buildings & lots (sq. ft.)=>
Volume of wash water (gallons/day)==========>
Temporary storage period (days)=============>
180
Freeboard (ft.) ____________________________>
1.0
Side slopes (inside lagoon):================>
2.4 : 1
Inside top length (ft.):____________________>
190.0
Inside top width (ft.):_____________________>
387.9
Top of dike elevation (ft.):________________>
49.8
Bottom of lagoon elevation (ft.):==_________>
36.8
Seasonal high watertable(SHWT) elev.(ft.):=>
38.0
Total required volume:===== ________, 572803 cu.
ft.
Actual design volume:====== ________, 668270 cu.
ft.
Stop pumping el.(> or = to 38.0 ft.SHWT)>
45.3 ft.
(> or = to 42.8 ft.Min.)
Required minimum treatment volume: 388800 cu.
ft.
Volume at stop pumping elevation: 436323 cu.
ft.
Start pumping elev.:________________________>
48.1 ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation: 622035 cu,
ft.
Actual volume less 25yr-24hr rain: 622207 cu.
ft.
NOTE: Verify that temp. storage is adequate:
Req. volume to be pumped:====> 137940 cu.
ft.
Actual volume to be pumped:==> 185712 cu.
ft.
VOlv.hcJ CO3.,yr+e�YM fAny Side 51 clocI Dirke l�4ibr600�d�
FICVp- oHJ /l ro1 /jbvll / SwrLc, -Ti iclJ13ooA
hQyOon �` Norin' ) 9 9 0
afar 6�3/oy.
W

Plan Amendment to Include S&WCC Chronic Rainfall Practices and Standards through March 31, 2000
1. If this facility can comply with its existing permit and CAWMP it must do so.
2. TemporaryAddition of New Spriyfields ( (Chec)Eippropridti bozek.)
[]A. acres of cropland. List crop types used:
[J B. acres of hardwood woodland @ 100 lbs PAN / acre added.
(] C. acres of pine woodland added @ 60lbs PAN / acre added.
3. Summer Perennial Grass (Check appropriate box.)
h�[] A. Application window extended for acres of perennial grass until first killing frost.
[] B. An additional 50 lbs of PAN applied to acres of perennial grass prior to killing frost.
r4'4. VPAN
plication Increased for Small Grains & Winter Grasses to be harvested. (Check appropriate box.)
Napplication increased up to 200lbs per acre for_ acres of small grains or winter grasses to be harvested.
application increased up to 150 lbs per acre for )9-/3acres of overseeded summer perennial included in 3. B.
5. Wad Analysis (Check appropriate box.)
A. Prior to December 1°, 1999 the calculation of PAN will be based on a 35% reduction of the last analysis taken
prior to the first 25 year 24 hour storm event. (Current waste analysis must be used after Dec.ln .)
[] B. Use current waste analysis to determine PAN.
6. Required -Maximum Nitrogen Utilization Measures for Small Grains and Winter Grasses.
A. Use of higher seeding rates, -
B. Timely harvest of forage to increase yield, and
C. Irrigating during periods of warmer weather.
7. Required - Irrigation Management Techniques to Reduce Runoff and Ponding Potential.
A. Making frequent, light irrigation applications, and
B. Not irrigating immediately before predicted rainfall.
8. The owner / manager is required to manage the movement of animals to and from the facility to minimize environmental
impacts, ensure compliance with the facility's permit and amended CAWMP, and avoid discharge to surface waters.
9. Authorization to use the additional practices included in this amendment expires if a facility discharges to surface waters.
Any discharge is a violation and may result in an enforcement action.
10. The owner / operator is required to keep records of all waste applications.
11. This revision must include a map or sketch of new land application areas.
Facility Number
Fa lity Owner / Manage Name (PRINT)
F ility Owner / Manager Signature
Date
Name
(PRINT)
l Technical Rpeci�st Signature
7
Date 1411b Orly
f—
This document must be filed at the SWCD office and be attached to the facilities CAVIMP
and be available for inspection at the facility.
(•) New temporary sprayfields must meet applicable buffer and setback requirements. Waste must not be applied to wetlands.
11/12/1999

s
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Pete Smith Farm
Harold Smith
677 NC 11 F ^
Pink Hill, NC 28572
252-568-3739
12-1.4-2000
This plan has been developed by:
Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Ao.ment Services, Inc.
PO Box 1096
Beulaville, NC 28518
252-568-
1
Deteloper Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement DEC 2 7 7006
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation andLM-enance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an anima waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required
Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted
by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: �y a
echnical Specialis ignature Date
-------------- ------ - ------
317039 Database Version 1.05 Date Printed: 12-14-2000 Cover Page 1

r�,
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 2,669,760 gals/year
by a 2,880 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This
production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
6153
Incorporated
10567
Injected
11637
Irrigated
6688
Actual PAN Applied
Year 1
6702
Notes:
In source ID. S means standard source. U means user defined source.
--------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
256139 Database Version 1-05 Date Printed: 12-14-2000 Source Page I

Narrative
FACILITY NUMBER 31-251
FARM NAME: PETE SMITH FARM
OWNER NAME: HAROLD SMITH
DESIGN CAPACITY: 2880 FEEDER TO FINISH
THIS PLAN IS A REVISION OF THE 6/24/97 PLAN COMPLETED BY JOHNNY LANIER. THIS
PLAN DEPICTS THE WETTABLE ACRES ON THE FARM AND DISPLAYS THE SAME IN THE
CALCULATION TABLES.
FIELD PS2 WILL UTILIZE A HONEYWAGON TO ACCESS I OF THE 14.55 ACRES IN THE
FIELD (SEE HONEYWAGON AGREEMENT). THE WETTABLE ACRE DET ASSUMES THIS
FIELD IS UTILIZED BY THE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM OWNED BY MR. MR. SMITH
WANTED TO UTILIZE THE HONEYWAGON TO ACCESS MORE ACRES OF THIS FIELD TO
REMAIN IN A PASTURE SITUATION. HE DOES HAVE ENOUGH LAND VIA THE TRAVELER
SYSTEM FOR HIS OPERATION, HOWEVER, SOME OF THE ACREAGE WILL HAVE TO
BECOME A BERMUDA HAY ROTATION.
THE APPLICATION RATES FOR BERMUDA PASTURE ARE CONTROLLED GRAZED RATES
SINCE MR. SMITH MOVES THE COWS TO DIFFERENT PADDOCKS AND HAYS PART OF THE
PRODUCTION OF FORAGE.
THE APPLICATION WINDOWS IN THIS PLAN ARE GENERAL IN REGARDS TO SMALL
GRAIN OVERSEED. FOR GUIDANCE ON THE WINDOWS AND RATES MR SMITH MUST
REVERT TO GUIDANCE MEMO FROM NCSU (INCLUDED).
ALL FIELDS MUST MEET MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS WHEN USED.
MR. SMITH PLANS TO APPLY SWINE WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH HIS SPECIFIC WASTE
ANALYSIS NOT TO EXCEED THE HYDRAULIC LOADING OF THE SOILS.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
256139 Database Version LO Date Printed: 12-14-2000 Narrative Page I

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland
needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper
timing of applications to maxilriz nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other
by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to
supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included.
A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the
manure generated by the operation. Animal operations that generate liquid waste and utilize waste storage facilities (lagoons or holding ponds) may apply more or
less waste in any given year than is annually generated by the facility. In order to determine whether the plan adequately utilizes the waste produced by the facility,
the storage capacity table included in this plan should be reviewed to ensure that the design capacity of the storage facility is not exceeded during the planning period.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being utilized.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used to balance the
nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited
so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
111-*e rr.a:-....7..., Tnill-
VPar 1
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Conlin.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
N
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
VA
tons
1000 pals
tons
5709
PSI
S7
Foreston
16.4
1 7.4
Bennudagrass Pasture
*6.0
Tons
*3/15-10/1S
* 255
0
0
Irrig.
255
10I.8
0.0
757.4
0.0
5709
Psla
S7
Foreston
16.41
7.4
Cereal/Annual Rye
1.5
Tons
*9/15-3/31
75
0
0
Irri
75
29.9
0.0
222.8
0.0
O/S, Graze, 4/7
Harvest
5709
PS2
S7
Foreston
14.6
11.0
Bennudagnss Pasture
*6.0
Tons
*3/15-10/15
* 255
0
0
hrig
255
101.8
0.0
1,119.8
0.0
5709
PS2a
I S7
Poreston
14.6
11.0
Coral/Annual Rye
1.5
Tons
*9/15-3/31
75
0
0
Inig
75
29.9
0.0
329.3
0.0
OIS. Graze, 417
Harvest
5709
P53I
S7
jAutrwilie
4.61
2.0
1 Bermuda ss Pasure
1 *5.5
1 Tons
*3/15d0!1S
* 235
1
Irri .
235
93.8
0.0
186.7
0.0
_________ _____ __ ___________________ __ _-______--- _._-_- _.
2%139 Database_Version 1.Oo Date Printed: 12-14-2000
.------------ .---------------------------- __________
WUT Page 1
I

Waste Utilization Table
Year I
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
'Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
bs/
Res.
(lbs/A)
N
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
1/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
5709
P538
S7
Autrwille
4.6
2.0
Cereal/Annual Rye
1.5
Tons
•9/15-3/31
75
0
0
Irri .
75
29.9
0.0
59.6
0.0
O!S, Craze, 4/7
Harvest
Lagoon Liquids
Total Applied, 1000 Ilons
2,675
Total Produced, 1000 lions
2,670
Balance, 1000 11ons
-6
Manure Solids
Total Applied, tons
0
Total Produced, tons
0
Balance tons
0
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol — means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol • means user entered data.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ----------------------------
256139 Database Version 1.05 Date Printed: 12-1.4-2000 WUT Page 2

�1
The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration
rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate
that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be
applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that
each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Annlication Factors
TMO
Field
,r
Soil Series
Application Rate
inchv bow
Application .4motmt
Indies
5709
PSl
Foreuon
0.50
0.96
5709
PSIa
Forestan
0.50
0.96
5709
PS2
Foreston
0.50
0.96
5709
PS2a
Foreamt
0.50
0.96
5709
PS3
Autryville
0.60
0.72
5709
PS3a
At. ille
0.60
0.72
-- __-._______________________________________________________________________ __-_-_-_____-g__ __-___-____
256139 Database Version 1.05 Date Printed: 12-14-2000 1AF Page I

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates
shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a
concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
Ib/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gallac
Minimum Acres
1 5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
1 10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
1 15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
com 120 hu
150
13.17
36.08 72.16
108.24
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.34
18.04 36.08
54.12
Soybean 40 bu
1601
14.051
33.83 67.65
1 101.48
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
256139 Database Version 1.05 Date Printed: 12-14-2000 Sludge Page 1

r `,
The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of
accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. This indicates that the planned
application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage
capacity.
Available Waste Storan Capacity
Source Name
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/15
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
100
1
2
101
1
3
102
1
4
100
1
5
98
1
6
123
1
7
148
1
8
173
1
9
180
1
10
178
1
11
177
l
12
146
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ----------------
256139 Database Version 1.05 Date Printed: 12-14-2000 Capacity Page t

11-1, Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design fold that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use
of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste. production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre
per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
-- ----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -- ----------------
2')6139 Database Version 1.05 Date Printed: 12-14-2000 Specification Page 1

method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11.
Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
�-
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12.
Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13.
Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14.
Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15.
Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied ar agronomic rates in a manner that causes not runoff or drift
r
from site.
M-------- - ---------------- : fic- ----g 2- - 139 DatabasVe e rsion 1.05 Date Printed: 12-14-2000 S �ation Pa e

16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
. sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
0. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
__ _______ ____ ---
256139 Database Version 1.05 Date Printed: 12-14-2000 Specification Page 3

�.. metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for
optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall
be maintained for a minimum of three years. Waste application records
for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
--------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- --
256139 Database Version 1.05 Date Printed: 12-14-2000 Specification Page 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): PS 1, PS2
Bennudagrass CP, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Effective artificial drainage MUST be in place to achieve Realistic Yield Expectations
provided for these soils.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind.
For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of
30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions.
Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row. For
broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium
and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 1001b/ac N in the
establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 Ib/ac N
annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.. Reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and
Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
The following crop. note applies to field(s): PS 1 a, PS2a
Cereal/Annual Rye Overseeded — Grazed
CEREAL RYE
The cereal rye should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth. The
most consistent stands are obtained from drilling rye into short (less than 3 inches tall) bermudagrass sod.
if drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short bermuda sod followed by a Tight cultivation
with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds should be 1.5 times the
rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda prior to August
31. An application of 50 lbs/acre of Plant Available N (PAN) may be applied between September 15 and
October 30. An additional 50 lbs.acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. I£ rye growth is
harvested on time and does not significantly shade the bermuda, PAN rates for the subsequent bermuda
crop are based on realistic yields of bermuda. A harvest is required prior to heading or April 7, which ever
comes first. This is necessary to minimize the potential for shading bermuda and reducing its yields. The
PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda overseeded with cereal rye must be reduced by 25%.
ANNUAL RYEGRASS
Annual ryegrass should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth.
The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling ryegrass into short (less than 3 inches tall)
bermudagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short bermuda sod followed
by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds
should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the
bermuda prior to August 31. An application of 50 Ibs/acre of PAN maybe applied between September 15
and October 30. An additional 50 lbs. acre of PAN maybe applied in February -March. If additional PAN
-------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2s6lsv Database Version 1.0 Date Printed: 12-14-2000 Crop Note Page I

�. is applied to the ryegrass in April -May, the PAN rate for the bermuda must be reduced by a corresponding
amount. This is necessary because ryegrass growth during April -May will reduce bermuda yields and
shorten the time bermuda can fully utilize the N. A harvest is required by heading or April 7, which ever
comes first to prevent shading of emerging bermuda during April -May period. To favor the production of
the bermuda, additional harvests of ryegrass will be required when the ryegrass canopy reaches 12 to 15
inches height. The PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda overseeded with annual ryegrass must be
reduced by 25%.
The following crop note applies to field(s): PS3
Bennudagrass: CP, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bennudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs I" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind.
For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of
30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions.
Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced I'to 1.5' in row. For
broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium
and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 Ib/ac N in the
establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 Ib/ac N
annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and
Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): PS3a
Cereal/Annual Rye Overseeded — Grazed
CEREAL RYE
The cereal rye should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth. The
most consistent stands are obtained from drilling rye into short (less than 3 inches tall) bermudagrass sod.
If drilling is not possible, the seeds maybe broadcast on short bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation
with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds should be 1.5 times the
rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda prior to August
31. An application of 50 Ibs/acre of Plant Available N (PAN) may be applied between September 15 and
October 30. An additional 50 lbs.acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If rye growth is
harvested on time and does not significantly shade the bermuda, PAN rates for the subsequent bermuda
crop are based on realistic yields of bermuda. A harvest'is required prior to heading or April 7, which ever
comes first. This is necessary to minimize the potential for shading bermuda and reducing its yields. The
PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda overseeded with cereal rye must be reduced by 25%.
ANNUAL RYEGRASS
Annual ryegrass should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth.
The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling ryegrass into short (less than 3 inches tall)
— --
-- — - -- -- -- -p
256139 Database Version 1.0 Datee Printed: 12-14-- 200- 0 --------- Cm Note PaB e 2

bermudagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short bermuda sod followed
by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds
should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the
bermuda prior to August 31. An application of 50 lbs/acre of PAN may be applied between September 15
and October 30. An additional 50 lbs. acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If additional PAN
is applied to the ryegrass in April -May, the PAN rate for the bermuda must be reduced by a corresponding
amount. This is necessary because ryegrass growth during April -May will reduce bermuda yields and
shorten the time bermuda can fully utilize the N. A harvest is required by heading or April 7, which ever
comes first to prevent shading of emerging bermuda during April -May period. To favor the production of
the bermuda, additional harvests of ryegrass will be required when the ryegrass canopy reaches 12 to 15
inches height. The PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda overseeded with annual ryegrass must be
reduced by 25%.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- - ---- -- - -----
256139 Database Version 1.0 Date Printed: 12-14-2000 CropNote Page 3

3
ANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number 31-251 County DuvIin Year 2o03
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) Pete Smith Farm
Operator in Charge for this Facility Harold Smith Certification # 26072
Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year ® YES
❑ NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part 11 and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste was generated but not
land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
PartI : Facility Information:
1. Total number of application Fields ® or Pulls ❑ (please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): 3 Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
20.4
2. Total number of Fields ® or Pulls ❑ (please check the appropriate box) on which land application occurred
during the year: 3 Total Acres on which waste was applied 20.4
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and the
permit:
6702
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken off
site during the year N/A tons ❑ or gallons ❑ (please check the appropriate box)
6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
Tan 03- Dec 03 = 2644
7. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year:
Largest
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals at the
facility is the annual average numbers)
8. Facility's Integrator if applicable: Goldsboro Hog Farms
Part II: Facility Status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS -NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites durit� ® Yes [I No
the past calendar year. ! D
AFACF 3-14-03
MAR p 1 2��A
�h
„ti, � tT l SE�S.OEtt.

R. The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from
® Yes ❑ No
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year.
S. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past
® Yes ❑ No
calendar year.
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during
® Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
5. There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the
® Yes ❑ No
levels specified in this facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year.
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year. N/A
❑ Yes ❑ No
7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon N/A
❑ Yes ❑ No
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume
for which the lagoon was designed.
-8. A copy of the Annual. Sludge_ Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification. N/A
❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the
® Yes ❑ No
past calendar year.
lo. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit .during .the past calendar Year?
❑ Yes ® No
11. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's
® Yes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
m All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during
® Yes _❑ No
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
is. Crops as specified in the CAWMP were maintainedduring the past calendar year on all
® Yes ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit.and.the CAWMP for this facility were
® Yes Q No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance witb.a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. Lam aware that there.are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Pittee Nayye and itle a or p
7 2/I /04
Signature offVnmttee Date
Signature of Operator in Charge Date
AFACF 3-14-03 2

Facility Number / Date of Visit: Tune: �
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
IMPermitted ®-Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered
FarmName: ...... CC..._s ._... ................... __......................
Owner Name:
flailing Address:
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:..
County._....__��P_..ly.....
_..._....._._.__._
Phone No:
FacilityContact:.._........................................_.__...........__......._... Title: .._....... _...................... _........................... Phone No: ....... _.... ................ ..................
OnsiteRepresentative:,,�mz.... _, Integrator:..__e5fr'/�
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude =• =' =11 Longitude =• =1 01.
Desrgn ;: Currentt Design
Current _ Destgn Current
Swtne Ca Po ulati nv.1?oultrym Ca
aat
_. act
GPo`Wation, •=Cattle Ca-aci Po iilation
Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish
Z$ $
1 {
❑ Non -Layer
U
ILI Non Davy
i'
0 Farrow to Wean
- Other"
-
Farrow to Feeder
Total Destgni.Capacity_
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Tofa1 SSLW
........... . ..... .._.
Number of Lagoons � -�x
Dischan & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...........z.................._........ _....................... .... ............................
Freeboard (inches): Z-
12112/03 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ❑ No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any smctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ❑ No
elevation markings?
Waste Anolication
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance, improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload[IFrozen Ground [ICopper and/or Zinc
12.
Crop type �/ac �/ s�Z
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ❑ No
Au Quality representative immediately.
Aald PA 7" = G6ot'�'
Reviewer/Inspector Name Z
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Field
Date:
Final Notes
L L/LL/VJ �.V/MMs4GV

Facility Number: 3� _� Date of Inspection
Reauired Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
❑ No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

Plan Amendment to Include S&WCC Chronic Rainfall Practices and Standards through March 31, 2000
1. . If this facility can comply with its existing permit and CAWMP it must do so.
2. Temporary Addition of New Sprayfields (') (Check appropriate boxes.)
11 A. acres of cropland. List crop types used:
[j B. acres or hardwood woodland @ 100 lbs PAN / acre added.
[] C. acres of pine woodland added @ 60 lbs PAN / acre added.
3. Summer Perennial Grass (Check appropriate box.)
[i A. Application window extended for acres of perennial grass until first killing frost-
[] B. An additional 50lbs of PAN applied to acres of perennial grass prior to killing frost.
4. PAN Application Increased for Small Grains & Winter Grasses to be harvested. (Check appropriate box.)
[] A.,PAN application increased up to 200 lbs per acre for acres of small grains or winter grasses to be harvested.
Gj$ PAN application increased up to 150 lbs per acre for 1 acres of overseeded summer perennial included in'3. B.
5. Wass�alysis (Check appropriate box.)
RIAPrior to December 1"; 1999 the calculation of PAN will be based on a 35% reduction of the last analysis taken
prior to the first 25 year 24 hour storm event. (Current waste analysis must be used after Dec.lu .)
[J B. Use current waste analysis to determine PAN.
6. Required -Maximum Nitrogen Utilization Measures for Small Grains and Winter Grasses.
A. Use of higher seeding rates,
B. Timely harvest of forage to increase yield, and
C. Irrigating during periods of warmer weather.
7. Required - Irrigation Management Techniques to Reduce Runoff and Ponding Potential.
A. Making frequent, light irrigation applications, and
B. Not irrigating immediately before predicted rainfall.
8. The owner / manager is required to manage the movement of animals to and from the facility to minimize environmental
impacts, ensure compliance with the facility's permit and amended CAWMP, and avoid discharge to surface waters.
9. Authorization to use the additional practices included in this amendment expires if a facility discharges to surface waters.
Any discharge is a violation and may result in an enforcement action.
10. The owner / operator is required to keep records of all waste applications.
11. This revision must include a map or sketch of new land application areas. .
Facility Number 3 / - �S L
Facility O r / Manager Name (PRINT)
ci ityOwner / Manager Signature
Date ��q9
Eac lity Name
Name
j Technical Spciialisi Signature
Date
This document must be filed at the SWCD office and be attached to the facilities CAWMP
and be available for inspection at the facility.
(r) New temporary sprayftelds must meet applicable buffer and setback requirements. Waste must not be applied to wetlands.
11/12/1999

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment /
and Natural Resources R�C'T'—J �I� _
SAP 1 1 Z000
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor NCDENR
Bill Holman, Secretary By. _/
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 1, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Harold Smith
The Pete Smith Farm
677 NC 11 East
Pink Hill NC 28572
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
The Pete Smith Farm
Facility Number 31-251
Duplin County
Dear Harold Smith:
A letter dated January 15, 1999 was sent to advise you about concerns associated with Certified Animal
Waste Management Plans and the method by which the irrigated acres within the plans were calculated. Only
the acres that are wetted can be credited in the waste management plan as receiving waste application. Any
acreage within the plan that can not be reached by waste application equipment can not be used as part of your
plan.
An evaluation by Dean Hunkele on 2/10/99 was made to review the actual number of acres at your
facility that receive animal waste during land application. The evaluation of your facility has yielded one of
the following two results as indicated by the box marked with an "X".
Category 1:
❑ The evaluation of your facility could not be completed due to a lack of information. Please
contact your Technical Specialist to assist in .providing Dean Hunkele the necessary
information to potentially exempt your facility from undergoing a complete wettable acre
determination. Please submit this information to Dean Hunkele, at 127 Cardinal Drive
Extension, Wilmington, NC 28405-3845, within in 90 days of the receipt of this letter. If you
have any questions please contact Dean Hunkele at [phone]. If within 90 days you
are .unable to provide Dean Hunkele with the information you are automatically
required to complete a Wettable Acre Determination as described by Category 2
below, within 180 days of receipt of. this letter.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolim27699.1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Category 2:
Your facility has been identified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
as a facility that -may have overestimated the number of acres actually receiving animal
waste. Therefore, some or all of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates
set in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated Technical Specialist to have him
or her conduct a Wettable Acre Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must
be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to conduct
Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialist with the N.C. Cooperative Extension
Service, the Soil and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and the Division of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System must be made and
the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be returned to DWQ within the next
180 days. If the needed modifications are not made and if the form is not returned within the
required time, DWQ will be forced to take appropriate enforcement actions to bring this facility
into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty assessments, permit revocation,
and/or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of the attached Wettable
Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the address listed on the form. Please
note that both the owner and the Technical Specialist must sign the certification. A copy of all
the Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste Utilization Plan
must be kept at your facility. DWQ and the Division of Soil & Water Conservation Staff will
review all documentation during their annual visit of your facility. An additional copy must by
kept on file at the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office. Please note that if you install
or modify your irrigation system, a designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer
must also sign the Wettable Acre Determination Certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sonya Avant of our
Central Office staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Harold Smith
The Pete Smith Farm
677 NC I lE
Pink Hill NC 28572
Dear Harold Smith:
/IT
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer ApplicationRecordkceping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 31-251
Duplin County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRYI, DRY2, DRY3, SLURI, SLUR2,
SLDI, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Harold Smith
The Pete Smith Farm
677 NC I IE
Pink Hill NC 28572
Dear Harold Smith:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 8, 1999
Subject: Conditional Approval
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 31-251
Duplin County
Our records indicate that your facility was conditionally certified in order to fulfill the requirements of
completion of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan Certification. This letter is to inform you of your
unresolved conditional approval status. Any facility receiving a conditional approval must notify Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) in writing within 15 days after the date that the work needed to resolve the conditional certification
has been completed. Any failure to notify DWQ as required, subjects the owner to an enforcement action. As of
December 7, 1999, we have no record of any information from you, advising us of the status of your conditional
approval. Therefore, please fill out the attached form and have your technical specialist and landowner sign the form
in the appropriate areas.
The completed form must be submitted to this office on or before 45 days of receipt of this letter. Please be
advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or liability for failure to
provide DWQ with proper notification of your conditional certification status or possible failure to comply with the
requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste management plan by December 31, 1997.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]
extension 571.
Sincerely,
,
Sonya L. Avant
Environmental Engineer
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION 1999
Facility Number _ a5
Farm Name: S `
On -Site Representative:%LU °
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: L "ti
Date of site visit-_2_6 ( 4
Date of most recent WUP: a�
__�Z/ Operation is*tlagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 11 eligibility item(s) F9 F2 F3 F
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption El E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit: _24pounds
Irrigation System(s) -circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler, 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part II, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE: 75 %, exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part If. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part If - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part III).
PART If. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
/ 2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
V F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits acrea fields 's
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage9� in excess
as noted in table in Part III.

Facility Number 3,
Revised January 22, I
Part Ill. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT I FIELD
NUMBER I NUMBER'-'
5-
0
TYPE OF TOTAL CAWMP FIELD COMMENTS'
IRRIGATIOSYSTEM N ACRES ACRES /,
0
�••�•�n - 11yuram, pwl, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of teld numbers depending on CAWIv
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise
determination. operation will be subject to WA
FIELD NUMBER' - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75 in of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 i£ 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 5, 1998
wr&aj
im
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Harold Smith �:�,
The Pete Smith Farm E 1 rZED OCT 0 7 19
67 NC 11E 98
Pink Hill NC 28572
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310251
The Pete Smith Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin County
Dear Harold Smith:
In accordance with your application received on August 18, 1998, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Harold Smith, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWGI00000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the The Pete Smith Farm, located in Duplin County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 2880 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal OpportunityAffirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS310251
The Pete Smith Farm
Page 2
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding. -
The subject farm is located in the Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact JR Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
icerel
i
Preston Howard, Jr., P.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County Health Department
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File -Central Files
Permit File-NDPU

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Darold Smith
The Pete Smith Farm
67 NC 11E
Pink Hill NC 28572
Farm Number: 31- 251
Dear Harold Smith:
/1"'�
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
July 31, 1998
RECEIi!ED
WX,T QLA 1iYsECI1ON
IAlli; 1 8 A998
Non-GiscllanJe Pc^rtGng
You are hereby notified that The Pete Smith Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Dave Holsinger with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
S 11,71511
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Wilmington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

2.
State of North Carolina RE C =' ;' = CI
Department of Environment and Natural Resou''r'"ces (-'UkJ,, /SECiioi'I
Division of Water Quality i , 9 b 1998
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form Q�t,
(THIS FORM MAYBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operat'on's?'t=00
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 FacilityName: The Pete Smith Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Harold Smith
1.3 Mailing address:
City, State: Pink Hill NC
Telephone Number (include area code): 919-568-3739
Zip: 28572
1.4 County where facility is located: Duplin
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major. highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Take Hwy 903 north from Kenansville. turn right on
SR 1700. Turn left on SR 1701. Turn left on Hwy. 111 north. turn right on SR 1705. Farm is 1.4 miles on north side (left).
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Goldsboro Hog Farms
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: $if9+/92- V*Xwwpey tg92
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: _31 (county number); _251 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Descript o� n Swine operation
Feeder to Finish
2880- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num er for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 31- 251

3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 26.09 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 22,6 22.3
2.4 Number lagoon storage ponds (circle which is applicable): I
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES o NO (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or NO lease circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? q.22A2
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? „
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item_
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.1 I Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 31- 251

7 \!.- D
_
VVA7fER 0-Ur11TY SECTIe^I
Facility Number:31 -251
Facility Name: The Pete Smith Farm
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
31998
Non-Discha'oo PerixiL l
(Land Ownees name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for T646 176vV yw ITH FstF-tN (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be retprned to me as incomplete. j
Signature 2�r'-f vi-� � _ Date 2—//-9e
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I,
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Tacility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 31- 251

4•
ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN CERTIFICATION FOR EXISTING FEEDLOTS
Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Management at the address on the
reverse side of this form.
Name of farm (Please print) :
/r
copy of a county road map with location identified.
Type of operation e, layer, dairy, etc.) : S i n�a
Design capacity num er of animals) : �y
Average size of operation (12 month population avg.): 21?,P0
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres) : o
a
Technical Specialist Certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant
to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the existing animal waste management system for the farm named
above has an animal waste management plan that meets the operation and maintenance standards and
specifications of the Division of Environmental Management and the USDA - Soil Conservation Service
and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001 - .0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum criteria have been
verified by me or other designated technical specialists and are included in the plan as applicable: minimum
separations (buffers); adequate quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party);
access or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of applications; application
rates; loading nates; and the control of the discharge of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe
than the 25 - year, 24 - hour storm.
V/When checked, see reverse side of form for con
Name of Technical
Affiliation (Agency):.
Address (Agency):.
Specialist (Please Print):
BILLY W. HOUSTON .
DUPLIN S & W CONSER. DIST.
PO BOX 277 KENANSVILLE NC
TELEPHONE [phone]
owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste
management plan for the farm named above and will implement these procedures. I (we) know that any
expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require anew certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management
before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste
from this system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe that the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed at the
farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District.
Name of Land Pi
Signature:
Name'of Manager,
Date:
Note: A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification (if the approved plan -is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
DEM USE ONLY: ACE#

Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
f the animal waste management system for your feedlot operation is
designed to serve more than or equal to 100 head of cattle, 75
^,orses, 250 swine, 1,000 sheep, or 30,000 birds that are served by
a liouid waste system, then this form must be fi'_led out and mailed
--v December 31, 1993 pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217(c) in order to be
deemed oermittedL/by DEM. Please print clearly.
arm Name: /7'Z!F►r-
Mailing Address:
County:
Cwner(s) Name:
.ianacer(s) Name:
_essee Name:
=arm Location (Be as specific as possible: road names, direction,
milepost, etc.) Iwrepc;ecnoN OF NC51Z 17048170i, NVVTNWFfiOF NCSy-17,94
_atit•,de/L ong'_tsde i f known: 469E f6-136- IS- 11
:resign capacity of animal waste management system (Number and type
confined animal (s) ) 29SO PIN15NI06
I
verage animal population on the farm (Number and type of animal(s)
raised) : 286a PINK'4146
Yea-- Production Began: "bIDWYMIASCS Tract No.: 4d9M 5709
't
Type of waste Management System Used: ANAyyoBrG LAboON
:.cres Available for Land
Cwner(s) Signature(s):
20
UA ACRK COASTAL
DATE:
=s3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
z
Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
HAROLD SMITH
677 NC 11 E
PINK HILL NC 28572
919-568-3739
Existing Feeder to Finish Swine
2880.00 hogs
Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
.plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. -Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
2880 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 5472 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2880 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 6624 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
i
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
5709
5
FOA
BP
4.5
225
0
11.7
2632.5
I
APR-SEP
5709
I10
5709
""1
5709
6
5709
-E
5709
'E
OR
SG 1.5
75
0
11.7
877.5
I
SEP-NOV
BP
4.1
205
0
4.1
840.5
I
APR-SEP
SG
1.2
60
0
4.1
246
I
SEP-NOV
C
120
130
20
6.5
84
I
MAR5 -JUN
W
55
110
0
6.5
715
I
FEB-MAR
DSB
28
112
0
6.5
728
I
JUN-SEPT
TOTAL16884.5
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3
48

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut.the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BP
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-PASTURE
TONS
50
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
DSB
DOUBLE CROPPED SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
4
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
AC
50
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
*
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
WETTABLE LBS AW N USED
ACRES_
22.3 6884.5
0 0
22.3 6884.5
** BALANCE -260.5
*** This number must, be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 5

a
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1065.6 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 5328
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 17.76 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 42.624 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial, soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount
(inches)
5709
10
AUB
BP
.5
*1
5709
5
FOA
Bp
.50
*1.0
5709
6
FOA
C
.50
*1.0
5709
Y10
SG
.5
*1
5709
�5
SG
.5
*1
57 99
-6
FOA
DSB
.50
*1.0
5709
"6
FOA
W
.50
*1.0
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or .
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
- would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should.be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. .Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 11

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
A
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:PETE SMITH FARM
Owner/Manager.Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: HAROLD SMITH
(Please print)
Signature: ,B^' *e:
Name of Manager(If different from owner).
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)JOHNNY L. LANIER
Affiliation:DUPLIN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Phone No. 910-296-2120
Address (Agency): PO BOX 277
KENANSVILLE NC /28349
Signature: 1tyV -� L �—�--- Date: WAY /9,?
Page: 12

INSECT CONTROL CHECKLIST FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS
Source
Cause
Flush Gutters
Accumulation of solids
Lagoons and Pits
Crusted Solids
Excessive Vegetative
Growth
Decaying vegetation
Feeders
Feed Spillage
Feed Storage
Accumulations of feed residues
Animal Holding Areas
Accumulations of animal wastes
and feed wastage
AMIC--November 11, 1996
BMP's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
(Liquid Systems)
LLEWWsystem is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated
soilds from gutters as designed.
emove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
( 1 Maintain lagoons, settling basins and
pits where pest breeding is apparent to
minimize the crusting of solids to a depth
of no more than 6-8 inches over more than
30%of surface.
aintain vegetative control along banks of
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
(Dry Systems)
( I Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g..
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the accumulation
of decaying wastage.
tan up spillage on a routine basis (e.g. 7-10 day
interval during summer; 15-30 day interval during winter).
1 I Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
insuring drainage away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products).
1 I Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed.
1 I Eliminate low area that trap moisture along fences
and other locations where waste accumulates and
and disturbance by animals is minimal.
( 1 Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e. inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids as needed).

f�r"',�s'it yh^�y°��+iSt
9i
v
Dry Manure Handling_ Accumulations of animal wastes 1 1 Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g. 7-10 day
Systems Interval during summer; 15-30 days interval during
winter) where manure is loaded for land application
or disposal.
() Provide for adequate drainage around manure stockpiles.
11 Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated wastes
In filter stripes around stockpiles and manure handling
areas as needed.
The issues checked ( amain to this operation. The landownerfintegrator agrees to use sound judgment in applying
insect control measures as practical.
I certify the aforementioned insect control Best Management Practices have been reviewed with me.
(Farm Name)
Number)
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
27695-7613.
AMIC--November 11, 1996

SWINE FARM WASTE MANAGEMENT ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST
Source Cause BMP's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead Swine production egetative or wooded buffers;
N-ReCa'mmended best management
and
Animal body surfaces Dirty manure -covered animals . () Dry floors
Floor surfaces Wet manure -covered floors ( SI floors;
µ-Wat6rers located over slotted floors;
( 1 Feeders at high and of solid floors; .
crepe manure buildup from floors;
1 ) Underfloor, ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits Urine uent manure removal by flush,pit
recharge,or scrape
Parital micorbial decomposition ( 1 Underfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fans
Volatile gases;
C _E&Rnrdmtonance;
Dust
' ' nt air movement _
Indoor surfaces
Dust
N-Wa§9own between groups of animals
() Feed additives;
( ) Feeder covers; r
() Feed delivery downspout extenders to
feeder covers
- Flush tanks
Agitation of recycled lagoon
() Flush tank covers
liquid whiles tanks are filling
(1 Extend fill lines to near bottom of
tanks with anti -siphon vents .
Flush alleys
Agitation during wastewater
(1 Underfloor flush with underfloor
_
conveyanance
ventilation
Pit recharge points Agitation of recycled lagoon ( 1 Extend rechard lines to near bottom of
liquid while pits are filling pits with anti -siphon vents
Lift stations Agitation during sump tank filling ( 1 Sump tank covers
and drawdown
Outside drain collection Agitation during wastewater ( 1 Box covers
or junction boxes conveyance
End of drainpipes at lagoon Agitation during wastewater ( 1 Extend discharge point of pipes
underneath lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces Volatile gas emissions Neer lagoon liquid capacity
Biological mixing (erect lagoon startup procedures .
Agitation mimum surface area -to -volume ratio
nimum agitation when pumping
( 1 Mechanical aeration
1 ) Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler nozzles High pressure agitation f-Hrio—ate on dry days with little or no wind
Wind draft ni recommended operation pressure
( ump intake near lagoon liquid surface
( 1 Pump from second -stage lagoon
-- AMOC--November 11, 1996

torage tank or basin Partial microbial decomposition
( 1 Bottom or midlevel loading
• surface Mixing while filling
( ) Tank covers
Agitation when emptying
( 1 Basin surface mats of solids
( ) Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface Partial micobial decomposition
( ) Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
Mixing while filling
level
Agitation when emptying
( I Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge Agitation when spreading
( ) Soil injection of slurry/sludges
spreader outlets Volatile gas emissions
( ) Wash residual manure from spreader after use
11 Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure, slurry Volatile gas emissions while drying ( I Soil infection of slurry/sludges
or sludge on field surfaces
( 1 Soil incorporation within 48 hours
I Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
11 Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals Carcass decomposition
open disposition of carcasses
Dead animal disposal Carcass decomposition
I Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits
1 I Proper location/construction of disposal pits
pits
Incinerators Incomplete combustion
( I Secondary stack burners
Standing water around Improper drainage
ra a rid landscape such that water drains
facilities Microbial decomposition of
away from facilities
organic matter
. Manure tracked onto public Poorly maintained access roads
( arm access road maintenance
ads from farm access
Additional Information:
Available From:
Swine Manure Management; 0200 Rule/BMP Packet
NCSU-County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies, EBAE Fact Sheet.
NCSU-BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge
—Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 128-88
NCSU-BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Ruse —Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129-88
NCSU-BAE
Lagoon Desig and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
NCSU-BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU-BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33
NCSU-Swine Extension
Environmental Assuranc Program: NPPC Manual
NC Pork Produces Assoc -
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force
NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 199S Conference Proceedings
Florida Cooperative Extension
The issues checked pertain to this operation.
The landowner/integrator agrees to use sound
judgment in applying
odor control measures as practical.
I certify the aforementioned odor control Best Managment Practices have been revwith me.
(La wrier Signa r
AMOC--November 11, 1996

MORTALITY MANAGEMENT METHODS
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
( ) Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours
after knowledge of the death. The burial be at least 300.feet from
any flowing steam or public body of water.
( Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G. S. 106-168.7
( ) Complete incineration
( ) In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and
design approved by the Department of Agriculture.
( ) Any method which in the professional opinion of the State
Veterinarian would make possible the salvage of part of a dead
animal's value without endangering human or animal health. (Written
approvalof the State Veterinarian must be attached)

Emergency Action Plan
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from you operations are leaking, overflowing,
or running off the site. You should NOT wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave your
property to consider that you have a problem. You should make very effort to ensure that this does
not happen. This plan should be available to all employees at the facility, as accidents, leaks, and
breaks can happen at any time.
1) Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to problems are listed below:
a) Lagoon overflow:
• add soil to the berm to increase the elevation of the dam
• pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate
• stop all additional flow to the lagoon (waterers)
• call a pumping contractor
• make sure no surface water is entering the lagoon
Note: These activities should be started when your lagoon level has exceeded the temporary
storage level.
b) Runoff from waste application field:
• immediately stop waste application
• create a temporary diversion or berm to contain the waste on the field
• incorporate waste to reduce further runoff
c) Leaking from the waste distribution system:
• pipes and sprinklers:
O stop recycle (flushing system) pump
® stop irrigation pump
p close valves to eliminate further discharge
® separate pipes to create an air gap and stop flow
Page 1

0 flush system, houses, solids separators:
O stop recycle (flushing system) pump
® stop irrigation pump
M make sure no siphon effect has been created
® separate pipes to create an air gap and stop flow
d) Leakage from base or sidewall of the lagoon. Often these are seepage as opposed
to flowing leaks:
• dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage, put in a submersible pump, and
pump back into the lagoon
• if holes are caused by buff owing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes
and compact with a clay type soil.
• _ other holes may be likewise temporarily plugged with clay soil.
Note: For permanent repair measures, lagoon problems require the consultation of an individual
experienced in their design and installation.
2) Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a) Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b) Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c) Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
3) Contact appropriate agencies.
a) During normal business hours, call your DWQ regional office: 910-395-3900; after hours,
emergency number: 800-858-0368 or 919-733-3942. Your phone call should include:
your name, facility, telephone number,.ihe details of the incident, the exact location of the
facility, and the location or direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind
conditions, what corrective measures have been taken, and the seriousness of the
situation.
b) Your integrator: Goldsboro Hog Farms Division, Maxwell Foods, Inc.
919-778-3130 extension 1430
c) If the spill leaves the property or enters surface waters, call the local EMS:
910-296-2160 .
Page 2

d) Instruct EMS to contact the local Health Department: 910-296-2126
e) (For technical assistance)
Contact CES: 910-296-2143
Local MRCS office: 910-296-2121
4) Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
5) Contact contract pumping and/or irrigation equipment companies:
a)
b)
c)
6) Contact dirt moving and/or heavy equipment companies:
a)
b)
c)
duplin
Page 3

`Operator:Harold Smith County:
Duplin
Date:
11/18/92
Distance to nearest residence (other than
owner):
0.0
feet
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
0 sows (farrow to finish)
x
1417
lbs. =
0
0
lbs
lbs
0 sows (farrow to feeder)
x
522
135
lbs. =
lbs. =
388800
lbs
2880 head (finishing only)
x
0
lbs
0 sows (farrow to wean)
x
433
lbs. =
0
lbs
0 head (wean to feeder)
x
30
lbs. =
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = 388800 lbs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 388800 lbs. SSLW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW= 1 CF/lb. SSLW
Volume = 388800 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet ; "Owner requests no sludge storage.
Sludge will be removed as needed."
4. TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME
Inside top length 175.0 feet Inside top width 410.0 feet
Top of dike at elevation 46.6 feet
Freeboard 1.0 feet ; Side slopes 2.5 1 (Inside lagoon)
Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation 45.6 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation i .35.1 feet
Seasonal high water table elevation 38.5 feet
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 170.0 405.0 10.5
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
170.0 405.0 68850.0 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
117.5 352.5 41418.8 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
143.8 378.8 217781.3 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. _ [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/
68850.0 217781.3 41418.8 1
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT TOTAL DESIGN LIQUID LEVEL = 574088 CU. FT

5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
0
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
175.0 410.0 71750.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
Length * Width =
0.0 0.0 0.0 square feet
TOTAL DA 71750.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Approximate daily production of manure in CF/LB SSLW 0.00136
Volume = 388800 Lbs. SSLW * CF of Waste/Lb./Day * 180 days
Volume = 94947 cubic feet
5B. Volume of'wash water 1.
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recircula
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallon
per CF -_
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amoun `
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volute = 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 41854.2 cubic feet

50. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.5 inches / 12.inches per foot * DA
Volume = 44843.8 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 94947 cubic feet
5B. 0 cubic feet
5C. 41854 cubic feet
5D. 44844 cubic feet
TOTAL 181645 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
Total required;%volume 11570445 cubic feet
Total design volume avail. 574088 cubic feet
Min. req. treatment volume plus sludge accumulation 388800 cubic
At elev. 42.8 feet ; Volume is 392395 cubic feet (end pumping)
Total design volume less 25yr-24hr storm is 529244 cubic feet
At elev. 44.8 feet Volume is 519923 cubic feet (start pumpin.
Seasonal hi`1g�h. water
table elevation 38.5 feet
7. DESIGNED BY: �l4'�1�jv APPROVED BY:
DATE:/ yj3/nL DATE:
+Scs
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN

SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
Clearing:
All trees and brush shall be removed from the construction area
before any excavating or fill is started. stumps will be removed
within the area of the foundation of the embankment and fill areas
and all excavated areas. All stumps and roots exceeding one (1)
inch in diameter shall be removed to a minimum depth of one (1)
foot. Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The
foundation area shall be loosened thoroughly before placement of
embankment material.
Cut-off Trench:
A cut-off trench (when specified) shall be installed as shown in
the plans.
Construction:
Construction of excavated and earthfill areas shall be performed to
the neat lines and grades as planned. Deviations from this will
require prior approval of the SC$. Earthfill shall not be placed
in standing -water and reasonable compaction of the fills shall be
performed by the construction equipment or sheeps-foot roller during
placement. The embankment of the lagoon shall be installed using
the more impervious materials. Construction of fill heights shall
include ten (10) percent for settlement. To protect against seepage,
when areas of unsuitable material are encountered, they will need to
be excavated a minimum of one (1) foot below grade and backfilled and
compacted with a suitable material (ie-CL,SC,CH). Refer to the soils
investigation information in the plans for special considerations.
Precautions should be taken during construction to prevent excessive
erosion and sedimentation.
Vegetation:
All exposed embankment and other bare constructed areas shall be
seeded to the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after
construction.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Owners name --:Harold Smith County:Duplin
Mail Address—: 0
Type of production unit ---- :Topping
Type of waste facility ----- :Anaerobic Lagoon
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a
given storage capacity. When the waste reaches the designed
level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients
in the animal waste should be used to 'reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an -
environmentally safe manner. AlwWys apply waste based.on the
needs of the crop to be grown and,the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than ss days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
reouirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report from your waste management facility.
The design of your waste management facility is based on the
following:
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year:
20SO animals x 1.9 tons waste/animal/yr= 5472 tons
total waste

Amount of plant Available Nitrogen Produced Per Year:
-----------------------------------------------------
2880 animals x 2.30 lbs. N/animal/year = 6624 lbs./yr
Available N
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should
plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in
a timely manner. Your facility is designed for 180 days of
storage. Therefore, it will need to be pumped every 6
months.
Tract Field Soil Crop Yield Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month to
No. No. Type Code per Ac. Used Apply
5709 10 Aua 6 7 Tons 400 4.6 1840 MAR—AUG
5709 4 GoA 6 7 Tons 400 1.2 480 MAR—AUG
5709 5 FoA 6 7 Tons 400 16.4 6560 MAR—AUG
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------
Total 22.2 88BO
Available Nitrogen 6624
Surplus Or Deficit —2256
Crop codes: 1=Cereal grain; 2=Corn; 3=Fescue; 4=Range Gr. Bermuda
5=Control Grazed Bermuda; 6=Hayland Bermuda
I
Narrative of Operation:
-----------------------
Seed A Permanent grass filter strip along all ditches that
receive animal waste
Call the Soil and Water Conservation District Office after you
receive waste analysis report to obtain the amount per acre to
apply and the irrigation application rate prior to applying
waste.p�
Prepared by:
Name Title / Date
Concurred in by:X-��74=—/—
�'rod�.icer Date -
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)

if
F
•5��Iffi'
. _ h w Y 'S�l�y..,l 1�� � :�Y ,1 f4a's;'`'ti.t ,�iy�C�•\ ,� /Y..1p��r� , i � Si . ��� �•) t`� .t
Ar: t,:D`F: �'`j��:a WL
._ F, i � A kJ V. ,. l�,l • . e11 iii�, . }W` ��y��,,�wT�l 'I �i'� '(t ��y* � ""l'Y. �
�" �xa _k 4 XS NS%''d%)•y M., a°�`.-V'h S.r Y. ?' t
-Alm
:s L i4P 1J 1 „x , V ••
..' y � - 4i'(jjo .a. , 7_. < : Ja.e� ����� ♦ - • V `� ' •hJjl',
�x L� as'fr� , j ..,,, t e �� :"�4.z•�' � .
�a�-gP� ,�t�'�JI.t�.��.•^� .SCa� s2�-. •� ~?lu�� s "a. �i 'l � § M��~ _ �.' �' 1 ��•- I w rt �.�� a
°}. •!r �} :'Qk,�l 1 a . i .�• �./b: .. < �'t.. J! f � �� •� � ,i1 _ � L� rl� }, yr�,�
i5::� 'iY`a,`9iLL E N+T'LY�y f.ri„)'�.� ..-' w<R-`J"' `. � ' � � v ��'•��
.� ,,, .. 41i-0�yp �y�✓ _ ' V' ttl r s..t�,�i.,\ n�Y`."'F J„ �� _ S: p L
ice,. �� �4wD�'J4.w%y ' �Nr'4i S'��FyVCbJ.�'.�"�'�^e n h • � ` _1 Y`y k f.
rk� ��'y 7�. �c "`+a Y.K�� •� a•• �..', %F,{a'�'^Y+"',w"14� `F�,r�,� t , �1.1q'�S'+ „ _�, ` � ,Ankh y a!
5=-t'' tom.^�1,y, wi1� `/�... Cy�.c:,A,��b,, `_xis. p�cax�ti. '„�'1'' • t. � �`5�- liti �1?'•
15• + .' <..:.� � 1 11 's `.. r1• � + `1 � S tiyri: yC
- 6sh 1 � � o. R^ � .y _ i i Z F " � �'i U L 1
of � � � � �• �+ �i tb�l � \ o. ��'n mod' P - ` ` a�.� •Y` ���.
\
'wig •7(<�.
y. , 1•' � 9 \ � Sa � -f !L `Y' Y „ � � F>' ; '�'. �l �C .rsa::• ' / �7� �F/�"
mar ,�- M . ,v'�i; •�� �,�� i �` • F, F f . � 1 / rg��l
/ •� i � 7 � � \ ACC f "ti�� sf �-•� T,'i // '/ � \ c J 1, 1c J
i . ,� ., � i � \ 9 � �y�- �1,.. ,,,�,�. '.v� ��i�,;�, ate✓ �., -: a� ., �v r
IFIL� `.�` �.�. � d"�\♦.t`' ."��.� � U ..�.� ��,. s+, i `te`,�ft - tr�`'c+;.�,"'�`7��.,m?Y.�Y!
tt � G4q •. .. 4�y41 . 171re. � ,.y yC.y Yf, i .. � � ��y�y' r .• / -
ti
'Lii k., b'� {t^C
�}i''i �a \N� ^ wl'+�.- 'VYj �,w �jR�"" ST.T ,• �. .�5+�'r,� ,tea �, \f �'�� � ` K2, j
i i;. Y t'l[ z.ibV '. ',a.:ifi4"- •k H�•�*� ..-,G{" C�,,,� \ ` < �� � ~ 1
4
k iC

0
SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS
AREA TO BE SEEDED: 3.0 ACRES
USE THE SEED MIXTURE INDICATED:
0 LBS. FESCUE GRASS @ 60 LBS./ACRE
(BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTE14BER 15 TO NOVEMBER 30
0 LBS. 'PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS @ 60 LBS./ACRE
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1)
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO JUNE 30
24 LBS. HULLED BERMUDA GRASS @ 8 LBS./AC-
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO JULY 31
0 LBS. RYE GRAIN @ 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
0 LBS. RYE GRASS @ 40 LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMBER 1 TO MARCH 30
LBS.
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
3000 LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (1000 LBS./ACRE)
6 TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
300 BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 BALES/ACRE)
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 8
LBS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
-----------------------------=
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment with minimum odor
control. The time required for the planned fluid level to be
reached may vary due to soil conditions,flushing operations, and
the amount of fresh water added to the system.
Land application of'waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent runoff from the field or damage
to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment B)
before land application.
3. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches eleva-
tion 44.8 as marked by permanent markers. Stop pump -out when
the fluid level reaches elevation 42.8 or before fluid depth is
less than'6 feet deep (this prevents the loss of favorable
bacteria) .
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.4
inch per hour.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

• U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
. .... .._,..; SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE'
rnn iwlvCCTIreTInN Tn nFTFRMINF SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
Kl
1
••• • • •• • •• • •
MM■e■■■�■■e®■■so®®M■■■■e■■
■■■®■■®■®■■®M■■M■■M®M■®e■■
����■■�■■■■■■■■■M■®®MO■
®®®®■■®®®®®■®®®■■
MEMO■
■®®®ENE
®®®M®®®®®■■®®®MOM=
vvmom
■■■■
MEN
M■M■M■eeBEEN
MMMMe■■■■■■■
NEW
eMMIN
■MMMee■
Me■mom
■■■■■
MEN
eMENO
e■■■■■
■M■■■n■■Q■
Ems
ee®■M■se®Mee
■®®M■®®■s®■®M®■M®®®®■mom
■
■eeMM
®SAM
r",
MEMO
Me■e■■■
■■■■■e■e■M■ee■Me■
Meeee■■■M■■®emcee■■e■M■■■e
Meeeee■■■■■ls■■■■e■■e■■■■MM
■M■e■®■
mom
■■®eeee■M■ee■Mee
ENE
■■■■■■■■■■■eM■■M■■M■MN
"�"'■MMMMMi
■siMMMMMM■■iii■
•.
o�©!�nanm,o!oo!m�mi©!mi®,mm!m!m.m!o!m!o!o
;�
I !
Mimim!m!m!e
ImM11m!m!m!mm!midt
MS
MIN��I�I�I®IS!�I�I��I�i�l�l�
W
I®NMIN IM1MIMIwM11M
I■I■I■i■�■I■I■
®®
!m!m'min;m!®is;m!m
loll®mm!�i®im!m;m!mlm!m!m
®��I®�;®'.®I®■IeI■I®I®F�IM�®I®IM
®I■■I■I

- TYPES OF MATERIAL ENCOUNTERED IN BORINGS
,- - (Usc one of systems below)
UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION .. I
USDA. CLASSIFICATION_: '
GW-Well graded gravels; gravel, sand mix
GP -Poorly graded gravels
G\t-Silty gravels; gravel -sand -silt mix
GC -.Clayey gravels; gravel -sand -clay mix
SW -Well graded sands; sand-grivel mix
. SP- Poorly ; graded sands
SM-Silty sand
SC -Clayey sands; sand -clay i6ixtuces '=
ML- Silts; silty, v. fine sands;sandyorclayeysilt
CL-Clays of low to _medium plasticity _
CH -Inorganic clays of high plasticity
MH- Elastic silts'. '
OL-Organic silts and silty clays, low plasticity,
OH -Organic clays, medium to high Plasticity
g-gravel — --
5 -sand
vfs -ve fine sand
sl-sandy loam
fsI-fine sandyloam-
gl-gravelly. loam .
si-silt - -
sil- siltloam -- -
cl-clay loam .. ... .. . . ........_ _ .
sicl-silty clay loam _
scl-sand clay loam'"-'
y y .
sic -silty clay.
c-clay
i. Suitable material for embanlonent is available Q Yes. a No Ytnatrare ,oaere /Doane ue 1i., slcdch on "
REMARKS:
n wrcl k. Ur fAAS:.. 0 !.. .SM •✓; �' hAvs +o bt ...o ✓­.. - / �-
6a Red ti �.7 cI,.7 (;r,) or . nru
2. Explain harards requiring special attention in design
-(S, m s rrrv..mct erel
r
,
GENERAL REMARKS:
24
25
26
27
?$
29
30
31
32113311341135
36
37
3tl
32
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
481491150151

NC-ENG-34
U. S. Department of Agriculture September 1980
$oil.Conservation Service File Code: 210
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
2
3
Describe potential for loss"Of life and dam ge to existing or
improvements from a sudden breach e o 0
Hazard Clas'�sification of Dam (®, b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classification (I,
By l�r
e
Concurred -By
name
NOTE: 1. :Instructions,on reverse side..
.2.. Attach additional sheets as needed.
able future downstream
Date1 ►. ��,�, 9i
Date 12-3f71—

MWiTO
Fjw i
A JIt1
r �j
I
IS
/ ae
9
r
a
U
1 ;. "
i f 7.

I
ft
3D Mesh Surface
Proposed
Protect: Harold Smith
Drawing: Farm 3
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Inclination: 20.0
3D Mesh Surface

Report: Plan View Cross-section Locations
Project: Harold Smith
Drawing: Farm 3
Surface: Proposed

Cross -Section Plots
Horizontal Interval a 100.00
Horiz. scale: 100 ft/in Vert. scale: 5 ftiin
Project: Harold Smith
Drawing: Farm 3
Number:
Location:
Hid Date:
Engineer:
RstSmator:
IPrepared by: Goldsboro Hog Farms using SITEWORK
Date: 11/18/92 Time: 10:26:47
Ea.1
- *EVi A 'fAg......................................................................................................................................................................

Cross -Section Plots
Horizontal Interval a 100.00
Horiz. scale: 100 -Pt/in Vert. scale: 5 Win
Project: Harold Smith
Drawing: Farm 3
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owngr:
Estimator:
Prepared by: Goldsboro Hog Farms using SITEWORK
Date: 11/18/92 Time: 10:27:50
..................................................................................................................................................................................... .

Cross -Section Plots
Horizontal Interval = 100.00
Horiz. scale: 100 ft/in Vert. scale: 5 ftiin
Project: Harold Smith
Drawing: Farm 3
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by• Goldsboro Hog Farms using SITEWORK
Date: 11/18/92 Time: 10:28:54
...................................................................................----....... ........... ..... r��................................
.............. ... .
................. .............................. P.rfiepspd.................................................................................6..........................
.............. J.......i............... .................... I ..... i....... ..........................4.............................................................................
............f .........,.....�'.......................................................................................................................................
.... . .. ...... .. ..
'ram
�r
..................................Eiiis'1.6.......................................................................
...........................1.............................. 14.........................................................................................................................

Cross -Section Plots
Horizontal,Interval a 100.00
Horiz. scale: 100 ft/in • Vert. scale: 5 Rein
Project: Harold Smith
Drawing: Farm 3
Number:
Location:
Hid Date:
pE�nngineer:
Estimator:
Prepared by: Goldsboro Hog Farms using SITEWORK
Date: 11/18/92 Time: 10:29:59
...................................................................n........i..��.................................................... ..............................
........................... r.-i............................ Pr:oP.PSe(71.....................................................-y.-. _..r�....................................
........................f......1................................10....................................... I.........................................................................
..................... J . . . . . . . . . . 4.............. n............{............................................I.........................................................................
................................. 5.......................... )........................................ cu<eka•wu...................................................................
............ ........................ I ........................ f.......................................................................................................................

Cross -Section Plots
Horizontal Interval - 100.00
Horiz. scale: 100 ftiin Vert. scale: S ftiin.
Project: Harold Smith
Drawing: Farm 3
Humber:
Location:.
Bid Date:
pEwnngineer:
Estimator:
Prepared by: Goldsboro Hog Farms using SITEWORK
Date: 11/18/92 Time: 10:31:03
— F,
....................................................................................................................................................................................
................................1...... kc:vr?+avu.............1..F...............................................................................................................
............................. r......es:..I... 7.............. l..r.....................................................................................................................
.........................................a.., .............. ,.G......................................................................................................................
............................................ i j........ Eii i * rfiq..................................................................................................................

Cross -Section Plots
Horizontal Interval = 100.00
Horiz. scale: 100 ftiin Vert. scale: S Win
Project: Harold Smith
Drawing: Farm 3
Number:
Location'
Bid Date:
Engineer:
wner:
stimator:
Prepared by: Goldsboro Hog Farms using SITEWORK
Date: 11/18/92 Time: 10:32:08
- F'
................................................................ P.r. mpssd........................................................................................................
..................................................................E*Tfs-irig...................................................... ...........................................,.....

=Report:Plane -sec cations
Smith
ed

Cross -Section Plots
Vertical/Interval = 100.00
Horiz. scale: 80 ftiin Vert. scale: S Win
Project: Harold Smith
Drawing: Farm 3
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Own r:
teimator:
Prepared by: Goldsboro Hog Farms using SITEWORK
Date: 11/18/92 Time: 10:36:04
.. P.r. aeRsad.......................................................................................................................................................................
......... 1..........................................................................................................................................................................
EiiiA i}ig.....................................................................................................................................................................

Cross -Section Plots
Vertical Interval - 100.00
Horiz. scale: 80 ftiin Vert. scale: S Win
Protect: Harold Smith
Drawing: Farm 3
Number:
Location:
Hid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:,
Estimator:
Prepared by: Goldsboro Hog Farms using SITEWORK
Date: 11/18/92 Time: 10:37:33
....................................................................................................................................................................... .
................ r.i .vr a.��a ................ ........................................................................................................................
....'.'.�. i.. ........................................................................................................................
................ 1.................. I ........... ./.............. . _r-,-,-,...................................................................................
.................. ............... ........ Eic st' i ri§........................................................................................................... .
.....................................................................................................................................................................................

Cross -Section Plots
VerticalInterval a 100.00
Horiz. scale: 80 ft/in Vert. scale: 5 Win
Project: Harold Smith
Drawing: Farm 3
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Ownr:
Estimator:
Prepared by: Goldsboro Hog Farms using SITEWORK
Date. 11/18/92 Time: 10:38:08
- C'
.................................................................................................................................................................................... .
........... ....... :....................... P.r. aepsgd............................................................................................................................
................ I ................................. I .............................................. ,.............................. i...................................................
.................. 1............................... I ........................................ RSf•3l-,wA..................... /.............
......r...................................
1
......................................................................................................................................................................................

Cross -Section Plots
Vertical/Interval a 100.00
Horiz. scale: 80 ft/in Vert. scale: 3 Win
Project: Harold Smith
Drawing: Farm 3
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
wn r.
stimator:
Prepared by: Goldsboro Hog Farms using SITEWORK
Date: 11/18/92 Time: 10:39:13
............................................ P.r.OPMW............................................................................................................................
J......................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................ _,,..-...................................................................
............................................................................................E)kI'd 'inA.............................................................................

Cross -Section Plots I
Vertical Interval - 100.00
Horiz. scale: 80 -Pt/in Vert. scale: S Win
Project: Harold Smith
Drawing: Farm 3
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
pwner:
Estimator:
Prepared by• Goldsboro Hog Farms using SITEWORK
Date: 11/18/92 Time: 10:40:17
O
........................................................Pros sed.................................................................................................................
............... ............................................................................
................................................ �l y.+.................................. �.......................................................................
................................................ ..............^+..... St Eic i Fi§.. ..........................................................................................

Cross -Section Plots
Vertical,Interval 0 100.00
Horiz. scale: 80 Win Vert. scale: S ft/in
Project: Harold Smith
Drawing: Farm 3
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
wn r.
stgmator:
Prepared by: Goldsboro Hog Farms using SITEWORK
Date: 11/18/92 Time: 10:41:22
.................................................................................................................................................................................... .
......................................................... P.r. ae pssd................................................................................................................
.............................................................. I......... ................. .N....................................................................................
........................................ J......'Y+^- - .j�............................................................................
....................................`...............................................

Cross -Section Plots
Vertical/Interval u 100.00
Horiz. scale: 80 ft/in Vert. scale: S Win
Project: Harold Smith
Drawing: Farm 3
Number:
Location:
Did Date:
Engineer:
Own r:
Est mator:
Prepared by: Goldsboro Hog Farms using SITEWORK
Date: 11/18/92 Time: 10:42:26
........................................................ rr. aesuv......................... .......................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
...........
............................................................................. *Uis [64
a

Cross -Section Plots
Vertical/Interval = 100.00
Horiz. scale: 80 ftiin Vert. scale: 5 Win
Project: Harold Smith
Drawing: Farm 3
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: Goldsboro Hog Farms using SITEWORK
Date: 11i18/n Time: 10:43:27
............................ :........................................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................Proppaed...........................................:.....................................
............................................................................................. Z2:li SYi: ..........................................................................

Total Volumes
Grid cell size: 4.49 by 4.48
Original drawing scale: 50.00 ft/in,
Project: Harold Smith
Drawing: Farm 3
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: Goldsboro Hog Farms using SITEWORK
Date: 11/18/92 Time: 14:39:31
Final surface: Proposed
Initial surface: Existing
Tight Volumes Expansion (�)
Cut 14210.78 0.00
Fill 10854.67 25.00
Difference 3356.11 Net Export
All volumes are in cubic yards.
Expanded Volumes
14210.78
13568.33
642.45
I

Site Balance Report
Grid cell size: 4.49 by 4.48
Original drawing scale__50_00_ft/in____
Project: Harold Smith
Drawing: Farm 3
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: Goldsboro Hog Farms using SITEWORK
Date: 11/18/92 Time: 10:08:16
Final surface: Proposed
Initial.surface: Existing
There are no "Proposed" structures.
Fill shrink/swell percent: 25.00 Cut shrink/swell percent: 0.00
Balancing to 0.0 +/- 10.0 cubic yards
delta Fill
0.000 4210.78 13568.33
0.094 13977.16 14081.13
0.081 14009.15 14009.03
Raise "Proposed" by 0.081 feet.
Cut - Fill
642.45
-103.97
0.12
i
h''

1 \
United States Soil P. 0. BOX 277
Department of Conservation
s$fJ Agriculture Service KENANSVILLE, NC 28349
a TELEPHONE [phone]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY SITE EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN
TO: PRODUCER HarA%d tT•f6;+h �/
LOCATION OF SITE 0#1 SR 004 at{- T t e-Zn .SQ D r
SIZE OF PROPOSED OPERATION y —12. 0 T
IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR LAGOON? YES ✓ NO _ SOIL CLASS. A .R
DISTANCE FROM THE LAGOON SITE TO NEAREST RESIDENCE OTHER THAN LANDOWNER OR HIS
TENANT /000 let -
NUMBER OF HOUSES WITHIN 2000 FEET OF LAGOON SITE ,3
ACREAGE/CROP REQUIRED TO PUMP EFFLUENT CAal'{a1 144t
DOES LANDOWNER HAVE ENOUGH ACREAGE YES ✓ NO
IF NO, DOES LANDOWNER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE ACREAGE? YES NO_
WILL FACILITY IHVOLV&'ALTERING WETLA bS? YES NO
I '
IF THE ABOVE QUESTION CONCERNING WETLANDS IS CHECKED 'YES', THE LANDOWNER IS
HEREBY ADVISED THAT THIS CONSTRUCTION MAY REQUIRE PERMITS FROM THE ARMY CORP OF
ENGINEERS. IT IS THE LANDOWNERS RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF PERMITS ARE
NECESSARY AND TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED PERMITS. THE ARMY CORP REPRESENTATIVE FOR
DUPLIN COUNTY IS:
JEFF RICHTER,
US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS
P. 0. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, HC 28402
TELEPHONE [phone]
LANDOWNER IS RESPONSIBLE TO DETERMINE IF ANY LOCAL OR STATE ZONING ORDINANCES -
AFFECT THE LOCATION OF THIS FACILITY.
DOES SITE MEET SCS CRITERIA FOR WASTE TREATMENT FACILITIES? YES ✓ NO
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
THIS APPROVAL IS VALID FOR 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE SIGNED. IF DESIGN HAS NOT BEEN
COMPLETED WITHIN THIS PERIOD SITE WILL BE RE-EVALUATED AT THE TIME OF DESIGN TO
ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH SCS STANDARDS. LAGOON WILL HAVE TO BE 750 FEET FROM ANY
RESIDENCE OTHER THAN APPLICANT'S AT TIME OF DESIGN.
OUThe Sol Cauenallon service
Is an agency of the
Department of ApAcpRwe SIGNATURE Q hTi�G QSC % DATE 9 -,?17-9 V-

F
US Department of Agriculture NC -CPA 16
Soil Conservation Service 4-92
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Land User/Owner Harold T.SM;Fh .lam County D.42/;g
Location/Tract & Field.Number T s7Q9 F#15 Acreage 21.1E
Prepared
Brief Description of Planned Pracctice/RMS///Project Measured
F^ Q.00" Cry 4-;cJ-_Are-& 4-
Environmental Factors and Resources to Identify and. Evaluate
1. Is wetland included in the planning area: (References: NCPM;
190-GM 410.26; Hydric soils list; Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the U.S.; National Wetlands Inventory Maps;
NFSAM.
No 'I
Yes - If yes,
-- Identify types present
-- Attach environmental evaluation showing what effect
planned assistance will have on wetland and how this
assistance is within policy
-- Have needed permits (CAMA, DEM, Corps, etc.) been
obtained by the landuser?
-- Make sure no planned practices will put the landowner in
violation of Swampbuster
2. Endangered and/or threatened species: (References: 190-GM
410.22; Technical Guide Section I-i(13). and Section I-vii
No Yes
0
-- Identify species whose range and habitat needs indicate
they might occur in planning area i
-- Identify on map any designated critical habitat
i
i

10. Are permits required?/Should the person contact permit agencies?
✓/ No Yes
J When an environmental factor or resource is identified on the
site, the user will refer to the appropriate reference for policy
and document the appropriate action in the notes portion of this
form.
NOTES, DOCUMENTATION, FOLLOW -Up
i
jl

<x* ♦1: f,1 ,.,+� rkf !MXYri'd. �-jj, f .+r'i$Hyf .y t.
'O �c t ' r �.; a ` : �, 4, .''.' .. C;:'". 1i•4. 7� .. {G�� n� t 4£`+p$ tr i�Jil, CJ I r _ 1
t
i '.]4(a
� t f. ' • // A L � { d{���4 A JY 4}� ! 4 ja0 � '.•'lv ! 1
- -: t: it // 1. - :.. w •: N ai� il'r...Q` f .-` , + b ! ` '� -'" � � '`may 4 � k<
y // {.. r rr , ♦ 1��1r Ad f�a �r`r J d'. f Ll,lt '., XI- ,
�..il.X..
j.,�N )s ,Jy yt �\41fy}a�•Y rt ,'F r ¢r '�b
J '
t
::S•ii.ji•:}:i:;': �) I +{,7f: �a•iJ f.,>ax... T
...........
y� ��, ai�t �y I:? S i•1 3r., 4Ye 44i y, t T��• f! il�r 1 ��t�• rr ,)� �fY M1� � .
i � J + IL �,�/ y '_ ''/ • = it ! >\ ' itr 1� eKR kl3. +[�l ri Ili T"� 'l��k L J -
T
':r ' rr.Fw ypf t r eryJ%f '.^c4r�&y'l�'Vr.;rr -u•thq r�.�,�•/i'�i"xd v}?. dt�•� k � k� 1.. .:
4 .✓' /, :J ! Jk /•, t{' ,� :t a• --rra�/{73
"GaitY
// �, •. r % �` ` tl.. IJ i A 4 Y 1 t , hrli�'{ p A1. i< b r \\\.
' Ftt KY tri ft#Y n.'1{a/ f %IJ.
\\ ' -: �' \\ k� , u4 at t - � r .✓ than �\ ' r 1 " /
( \\\.. qt.''t "rwb'>f r,,.•. "Fixr r�p7tr\\�i i%'�� '1
h4� r •. 1 3�.w� t • t r/ btu.. \\\
` �� »iti.` i; 1•' a \R
'y \\\ ,N:.. �? '1lie
r a• O `\- i i' i1 " < +�r"i�/i. �`Si'' ',l
�%ri}{Y,} " - r T•,' r -'
.:... Fri:
ryr,lze
Xn
� s ,

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
5709
5
FOA
BP
4.5
225
0
11.7
2632.5
I
APR-SEP
5709 '5 1 SG I.S 75 0 11.7 877.5
I /.0 lL SEP-NOV
5709 10 AUB BP 4.1 205 0 4.1 840.5
I I APR-SEP
5709 '10 SG i 60 0 4.1 246
I /.v SEP-NOV
c
5709 6 FOA C 120 130 20 6.5 845
I MAR-JUN
5709 '6 FOA W 55 110 0 6.5 715
I F�ETB-MAR
c
5709 '6 FOA DSB 28 112 0 6.5 728
I JUN-SEPT
15
END
I
TOTAL16884.5
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen. /
X Page: 3

NOMM CaroFa$We UrAwan is a land. Deperbnent of Crop Science
rm univwaty and a oweltuor t rduLd wi
Of tlr UNrwaty a North Cabe
Coraga of Agriculture and Life solara:as
Campus Box 7620
Raleigh, NC 27895.7620
919.516.2647
919.515.7959 OW
Memorandum
TO: North Carolina Certified T nical SpeaLis4
FROM: Dr. Jim Green, Chairman
NC State University Forage roduction Workgroup
DATE: June 29, 1998 1/
SUBJECT: Crop Management Practices for Select Forages
Used in Waste Management
The following is a four -page summary of suggestions for management practices for some
forage crops that can be used in waste management plans. These suggestions are a result of
discussions within the NC State University Forage Production Workgroup, a group comprised
of NC State faculty and NRCS agency personnel with expertise with the crops.
There are limited documented research responses of some of these practices on the many soils
and environments where these crops are currently being grown. The Forage Production
Workgroup has taken the available data and used the combined experiences and realistic
estimates of key people to come up with suggestions that will allow farmers to incorporate
these crops and practices into waste management plans. As data become available to
substantiate or refute these suggestions, the Forage Production Workgroup will make
appropriate changes.
Bermuda Overseeded With Cereal Rye and Annual Ryegmss
Currently two types of "ryegrass" are being used for winter ovetseeding in fields used for
animal waste management. Cereal is a winter annual smallgrain that looks similar to
wheat, barley and oats. Annual ryeg m is a winter annual grass that looks touch like tall
fescue. Both of these grasses, when growing during the winter on bermuda sod, can have
significant impact on subsequent bermuda yields. In effect, the total yields from an acre
growing the combination of bermuda with these winter annuals will usually yield between 1-2
tons more per acre than bernizida growing alone for the year. Therefore, the total amount of
PAN /acre for the year is about 100 fibs more than for bermuda alone. Although cereal rye and
annual ryegrass are suitable crops for overseeding, the management of the crops are different
and thus practices implemented are dependent on the crop selected.

Nan, carows sub U*034 is a rand- Departroetrt of Crop Science
Vwd urranty and a ardnuat hatuon
of Ttr LWmaty d Na15 CW*4
. Conga d Agriculture and Uta Sdarwaa
�. Campus Box 7620
Rddpft, NC 2769S-7620
9191152647
919115.7959 (tax)
Cereal Rye
The cereal rye should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter
growth. The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling rye into short (less than 3
inches tall) bermudagrass sod If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short
bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate
for broadcast planting of seeds should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last
application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda prior to August 31. An
application of 50 lbs/acre of Plant Available N (PAN) may be applied between September 15
and October 30. An additional 50 lbs/acre of PAN may be applied in February-Marcb. If rye
growth is harvested on time and does not significantly shade the bermuda, PAN rates for the
subsequent bermuda crop are based on realistic yields of bernnmda. A harvest is required prior
to heading or April 7, which ever cogs first. This is necessary to minimize the potential for
shading Bermuda and reducing its yields. The PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda
overseeded with cereal rye trust be reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical
Standard #590.
Annual Ryegrass
Annual ryegrass should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter
growth. The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling ryegrass into short (less than 3
inches tall) bermudagtass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short
Bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate
for broadcast planting of seeds should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last
application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda prior to August 31. An
application of 50 Ibs/acre of (PAN) may be applied between September 15 and October 30.
An additional 50 Ibs/acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If additional PAN is
applied to the ryegrass in April -May, the PAN rate for the bermuda must be reduced by a
corresponding amount. This is necessary because ryegrass growth during April -May will
reduce bermuda yields and shorten the time bermuda can fully utilize the N. A harvest is
required by heading or April 7, which ever comes first to prevent shading of emerging
bermuda during April -May period. To favor the production of the bermuda, additional
harvests of ryegrass will be required when the ryegrass canopy reaches 12 to 15 inches height.
The PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda overseeded with annual ryegrass must be
reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical Standard #590.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Harold Smith
The Pete Smith Farm
67 NC HE
Pink Hill NC 28572
Dear Harold Smith:
1, •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 9, 1998
RtEC E" E➢9 SEP 1 5 1998
Subject: Application No. 31-0251
Additional Information Request
The Pete Smith Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Duplin County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject
application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following
components by October 9, 1998:
1) There is a discrepancy in the com/wheat/soybean rotation. Table 1 of the WUP states that Corn will be
irrigated from March to June followed by Wheat from February to March. This results in an 8-month
period of no irrigation from the time the corn is harvested to when the wheat is planted. The
discrepancy is that the lagoon is only capable of temporarily storing 6 months (180 days) of waste. I
recommend that the wheat application time be revised to October to March so that the temporary storage
is reduced to 4 months.
2) Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) states that the Realistic Yield Expectations (RYE) for Small Grain
overseed is 1.5 and 1.2 tons/acre. Referring to the RYE manual issued by the NCSU Cooperative
Extension Service, the yield for Small Grain overseed in the any soil series should be 1 ton/ac. Note
that actual yields that are higher than the RYE's listed by the NCSU Coop Extension may be used for
facilities that can document such yields with records that show the average yield for three out of five
years meets or exceeds the actual yields used in the WUP. If this is not the case, please make the
appropriate changes to the WUP to reflect the correct RYE.
All revisions / amendments are required to be signed and dated by both the landowner and the Technical
Specialist before they are submitted for review. Please reference the subject permit application number when
providing the requested information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my
attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before October 9, 1998
or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility
will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a
violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the
Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 364.
Sincerely,
Brian E. Mondschein
Environmental Technician
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 31, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
T RNRECEIPT REQUESTED
Rarol3 Smith
The Pete Smith Farm
67 NC HE
Pink Hill NC 28572
Farm Number: 31- 251
Dear Harold Smith:
V awA
AILTY4•
�..i��
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLMA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that The Pete Smith Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Dave Holsinger with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
—--_
S'
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Wilmington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Harold Smith
The Pete Smith Farm
67 NC HE
Pink Hill NC 28572
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: The Pete Smith Farm
Facility ID#: 31-251
Duphn County
Dear Mr. Smith:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely/ /�-/ A. Preston Howard, Jr., P. ., erector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, N�`
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 �fC An Equal Oppo tunny/Affi matve Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 2 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN CERTIFICATION FOR EXISTING FEEDLOTS
Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Management at the A e
reverse side of this form.
Name of farm (Please print)
Mailing Address:
FEB 2 3 1996
County(of farm):
y? 1r(required), so, please attach a
copy of a county road map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.) : Swine
Design capacity (number of animals) : -18F0
Average size of operation (12 month population avg.): ? pQ0
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres)
Technical Specialist Certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant
to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the existing animal waste management system for the farm named
above has an animal waste management plan that meets the operation and maintenance standards and
specifications of the Division of Environmental Management and the USDA - Soil Conservation Service
and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001 - .0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum criteria have been
verified by me or other designated technical specialists and are included in the plan as applicable: minimum
separations (buffers); adequate quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party);
access or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of applications; application
rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe
than the 25 - year, 24 - hour storm.
t/ When checked, see reverse side of form for con
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation (Agency):
Address (Agency):
Signature: A _r it ,. �llaw~w 2 16 94
BILLY W. HOUSTON
DUPLIN S & W CONSER. DIST.
PO BOX 277 KENANSVILLE NC
TELEPHONE [phone]
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste
management plan for the farm named above and will implement these procedures. I (we) know that any
expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management
before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste
from this system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe that the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed at the
farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District.
Name of Land wne Ple Print): I S
Signature:
Name of Manager, if rent from o ner (Please pnnt):
Signature:
Note: A change inland ownership requires notification or anew certification (f the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
DEM USE ONLY: ACEN EOD(7(D�
_�5I-251

CONDITIONS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS TO CERTIFICATION
All statements checked apply to this certification:
The installed irrigation system has not been evaluated concerning nozzle size, spray pattern, spacing, pump size, pipe size,
etc. It is the responsibility of the producer to operate the system with the proper components and to supply the required
maintenance to assure that no runoff occurs. The producer is encouraged to have an irrigation specialist, possibly the dealer
where the system was purchased, prepare an operation and maintenance plan for the irrigation system so that the producer
knows how to operate the equipment to meet the non -discharge requirements.
The waste management plan for this operation is based upon yields higher than what is now recommended by NRCS;
however, these yields are obtainable under high levels of management. This increase in projected yields is necessary since
the NRCS plan prepared for this operation at the time of construction was based upon these higher yields and the producer
followed MRCS guidelines when building this operation.
Because of limited acres for land application, and because the original MRCS waste utilization plan did not require
additional acres for buffers and irrigation inefficiency, it may be necessary for the producer to operate half sprinklers, on
solid set systems, along field edges and ditches. Also for traveling irrigation systems, a pull directly adjacent to the ditch with
only a 180 degree pumping radius may be needed to irrigate the entire field. Extreme caution should be exercised when
applying waste close to ditches and wetlands to avoid any discharge.
CERTIFICATION FOR EXISTING FEEDLOTS
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CERTIFICATION OF APPROVED ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR EXISTING ANIMAL
WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS SERVING FEEDLOTS
REQUIREMENTS/PURPOSE
In order to be deemed permitted by the Division of Environmental Management (DEM), the owner of any existing animal waste
management system constructed and operational before January 1, 1994 which is designed to serve greater than or equal to the animal
populations listed below is required to submit a signed certification form to DEM before January 1, 1998. Pasture operations are exempt
from the requirement to be certified.
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1,000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid waste systern
The certification must be signed by the owner of the feedlot (and manager if different from the owner) and by any technical specialist
designated by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The technical specialist must verify
that all applicable operation and maintenance standards and specifications can be met. Existing systems are not required to meet design
and construction standards and specifications.
Although the actual number of animals on the facility may vary from time to time, the design capacity of the waste handling system should
be used to determine if a farm is subject to the certification requirement. For example, if the waste system for a feedlot is designed to
handle 300 hogs but the average population will be 200 hogs, then the waste management system requires a certification.
This certification is required by regulations governing animal wastemanagement systems adopted by the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) on December 10, 1992 (Title 15A NCAC 2H .02L7).,
CERTIFICATION FORM
On the reverse side of this page is the certification form which must be submitted to DEM before January 1, 1998. Assistance in
completing the form can be obtained from one of the local agricultural agencies such as the Soil and Water Conservation District, the
USDA -Soil Conservation Service, or the N.C.. Cooperative Extension Service. The Completed form should be sent to:
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section, Planning Branch
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535

k" �' v � p le � � � glea• � . k
.. � � try • o r e` I F --�.�
4 � � � \•'I p Id P //_ (Bye d .J � t
14
Y R is � � e w
V
� J � w 1� i e •g� � �• °�f � 4 p
f,
" CAP£ s1 C i
r''" � n <1 [.° ♦�„ NOHTIIlA51' .Ids A � ac� ♦ /�_I d
CAP£ �10,/
I4 C B^ EHP p
p , NOHTIIEA$T ,_YET I- !I ^) � v ? F � ♦♦
L ( 1 r\
P.
lo
v - ' _ I8 C �r. 4 L'• a Al : y a fl f I t'O � .e % rr.f
la '0 _ I[ _ ' 9 �m � r c° 1i •.\ `_/O`r.4�—_ b E .e � dJn w y _ ,t � � { I 4
yvG J t.l I,3 p ' ^ , " \ ✓ '.J � [ 1 f � � � r. 2 4!I M JO {II M 1 I.4 p
01
I. 91 c IB ' e 2 "!- _ n^ .r >J .e c.l 16 I• �..� < C [i n•s'
1- \t\ A N
K I �:�.td• � a
It

>' Z.405 591 381
Receipt for
Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided l
Do not use for International Mail
< — (See flev—er—/s/g1
cS
eat and
R
m
.. State a ZIP
Postage /
l7
L
Certified Fee
I ��
IL
�
LL
i
ISpeciallDellvary; Feet
I
Restricted: Delivery, Fee
I
Return Receipt Showing
q
to Whom & Date Delivered
/ U
Return Receipt Showing to Whom,
Data, and Addmsse is Address
TOTAL Postage
Z
& Fees
Postmark or Date
tdC p.
DELI `y
F111 4'
J y
�,
t

• State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr. Division of Environmental Management Jonathan B. Howes
Governor Water Quality Section Secretary
DECEMBER 11, 1995
CERTIFIED MAIL Z 405 591 381
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Harold Smith
677 NC11 East
Pink Hill, North Carolina 28572
Subject: Kitty Noecker Farm
Lagoon Construction Activity
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Smith:
• Thank you for the cooperation that you gave during the
Division's recent visit to your farm sites. This letter is in
response to the visit that we made to the Kitty Noecker Farm. A
letter, dated October 11, 1995, was sent to you via certified mail.
Neither the receipt notification nor your reply was received at
this Office. Therefore, the letter is being sent to you again. You
may remember that I had a concern about the condition of the newly
constructed lagoon. The lagoon's 3 to 1 internal slope was
interrupted in a localized section on the southeastern end. This
area had a shear wall cut into the 3:1 slope and the surficial
aquifer was dripping through into the lagoon in it's uncharged
state. As I mentioned, I do not have installation approval
authority for swine lagoons, but I do realize that the lagoon does
.not meet USDA design guidelines in it's current condition. I have
talked to Mr. George Pettus with Goldsboro Hog Farms and he
indicated that the NRCS-Duplin County is to certify the facility.
Mr. -Pettus also indicated that he was not aware of the lagoon's
condition until Mr. Mitchell informed him.
I recommend that you contact the NRCS-Duplin County or a
technical specialist designated by the Soil & Water Conservation
Commission to receive instructions on the proper installation of
swine lagoons. The lagoon requires additional work to meet approved
design guidelines. The shear wall will not seal and the interrupted
• internal slope should be corrected.
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845 • Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirrtutive Action Employer

Mr. Harold Smith
December 11, 1995
Page Two
It is requested that you provide this office with written
correspondence that addresses corrective actions taken within 10
days of the receipt of this letter. If you have questions
concerning this subject, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Jim Bushardt, P.E.
Environmental Engineer
JB:HSMITH2.D95
•
cc: Michael Sugg (NRCS Duplin Co.)
Tom Jones is
George Pettus (Goldsboro Hog Farms)
Wilmington Files (Duplin Co. 31-251.6)
•

•
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr. Division of Environmental Management Jonathan B. Howes
Governor Water Quality Section Secretary
OCTOBER 11, 1995
,CERTIFIED MAIL Z 405 591 328
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Harold Smith
677 NC11 East
Pink Hill, North Carolina 28572
Subject: Kitty Noecker Farm
Lagoon Construction Activity
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Smith:
Thank you for the cooperation that you gave during the
Division's recent visit to your farm sites. This letter is in
response to the visit that we made to the Kitty Noecker Farm. You
may remember that I had a concern about the condition of the newly
constructed lagoon. The lagoon's 3 to 1 internal slope was
interrupted in a localized section on the southeastern end. This
area had a shear wall cut into the 3:1 slope and the surficial
aquifer was dripping through into the lagoon in it's uncharged
state. As I mentioned, I do not have installation approval
authority for swine lagoons, but I do realize that the lagoon does
not meet USDA design guidelines in it's current condition. I have
talked to Mr. George Pettus with Goldsboro Hog Farms and he
indicated that the NRCS-Duplin County is to certify the facility.
Mr. Pettus also indicated that he was not aware of the lagoon's
condition until Mr. Mitchell informed him.
I recommend that you contact the NRCS-Duplin County or a
technical specialist designated by the Soil & Water Conservation
Commission to receive instructions on the proper installation of
swine lagoons. The lagoon requires additional work to meet approved
design guidelines. The shear wall will not seal and the interrupted
internal slope should be corrected.
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 29405-3845 • Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Harold Smith
October 11, 1995
Page Two
It is requested that you provide this Office with written
correspondence that addresses corrective actions taken within 30
days of the receipt of this letter. If you have questions
concerning this subject, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone].
Sincerel�yj,
�JNi2��" Q"vW
Jim Bushardt, P.E.
Environmental Engineer
JB:HSMITH.o95
•
cc: Michael Sugg (NRCS Duplin Co.) e
Tom Jones
George Pettus (Goldsboro Hog Farms)
Wilmington Files (Duplin Co. 31-251.5)
•

•
C�
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEKENT
DEMMER 5, 1995
To: Tom Jones
(DSW-Morehead City)
From: Jim Bushardt
Through: Dave Adkins
Subject: Kitty Noecker Farm
Lagoon Construction Activity
Duplin County
The Division's Wilmington Office had requested Mr. Smith to
respond within 30 days concerning an anomalous lagoon
construction. You received a copy of this letter and one is being
provided along with this memo. The Wilmington Office has not
received information from Mr. Smith concerning corrective actions
that were deemed necessary. Without this information, DEM must
assume that the lagoon has not been repaired and does not meet
NRCS guidelines. The writer considers that since the Wilmington
Office has no record of Mr. Smith's reply, he may not follow DEM
advice.
Prior to sending a letter to our compliance group relative
to objections for certification, I request that DSW follow up
with NRCS or the project's technical specialist to determine if
proper lagoon construction (the repair) has been performed and if
the lagoon has been certified with exceptions or with information
concerning the repair of the construction anomaly. If the lagoon
is presently in a charged condition such that visual inspection
to verify compliance will be difficult, and the certification
does not specifically address the needed repair, this farm will
be suspect for design compliance.
If you would care to have a meeting on site to address the
lagoon nonconformance, or if you have questions concerning this
topic, please contact me at [phone]. I thank you in
advance for your support.
JB:HSMITH.D95
Wilmington Office Files (Duplin Co. 31-251.6)

0'
Z 405. 591 '328
Receipt for
Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided
Do not use for International Mail
(See Reveal) . j
L
A
St et
tE
�
Stye
00
Postage
$
9
�f
v�
C
Certllie0 Fee
t
t
SpeciaLOeliverv: Fae,
'
G
'Resuicte efN
1
R p
to 0
to
Re crept o
g to
Oa Addr
Ad
TO aBo
i
L
s Fe
Postmar
I

United States Natural Resources
Department of Conservation
Agriculture Service
P. O. Box 277
Kenansville, NC 28349
Telephone [phone]
• December20, 1995
�WMETZEIJ
ll�n1! JAN 2 9 m;
Mr. Harold Smith, Jr.
677 NC I 1 E
Pink Hill, NC 28572
Mr. Smith:
On October 18, 1995 1 sent you a letter along with an engineer's report of corrective measures
to be performed on your new swine lagoon, ( Kitty Noecker Farm), in order for this lagoon to
meet NRCS standards and specifications. -Specifically, the report required that the depth of the
clay liner be increased in some areas of the lagoon and the steep sideslope to be regraded to a
3:1 slope.
On October 20, 1995 Billy Houston and Johnny Lanier re -checked this lagoon to evaluate the
corrective measures you had performed. They found that you had corrected the deficiencies
according to the recommendations and therefore this lagoon was eligible for certification.
Based upon their evaluation, the certification was completed.
If you have any questions regarding this certification, please contact me.
Sincerely,
•
Michael E. Sugg
District Conservationist
< iV0-
P� OLt`R PPkeNC CONI F SATiCN f 25-G1(7. 11�ELC1✓6Ti TtHrs
IN M`{ OFFIGG 1- 24 -eI6. 05T6 _V+1< FAW4Wa12-,k
NeLCSSA,2y, A -NV aUE,SrIONS, PLEAe�e CALL q141--7 7`3-3i3o.
U'.,_.__. ....
11,e Named Ruoun:,a Conurvnlion Scrvice.
fom:cAy the Soil Conmrvation Scrvice.
:,., :...... y nr w.
Llniml Sl:nc. Uq.nnmcN of Agdculu,m
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER

Y-
�* ;AEG=STRAT_0:, =_nM FOR :`TM -AL FEEDLOT _PEP'TT NS
Decart:�:eia or Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
_= the animal waste management system for your feedlot operation is
designed to serve more than or equal to 100 head of cattle, 75
horses, 250 swine, i,000 si,eep, or 30,000 birds t_:=t are served b_
a _icuic waste system, then this form must be filled out and mailed
by December 31, 1993 pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217(c) in order to be
deemed permitted by DEM. Please print clearly.
_rm Name: /71iE
M=i1' Address:
County: O .n/;vim Phone
. T,
Owners) Name: I-fA/Ld IJ
Manager(s) Name:
Lessee Name:
=_rm Location. (Be as specific as possible: road names, direction,
^i I epOSt, etc .) : jwryw;ELTION OF NL5j2 1904 s 17a�; , Novyjw r of Ne4iL (7,94
_grit de/T_c.^.c_tade i f known: al5w (6-135- 15- 11
Desicn capacity of animal waste management system (Number and type
_f conf'-ned animal (s)) : 2fSO PiNISNiNG
Average animal population on the farm (Number and type of animal(s)
raised) : ZSbo f-INISu1N6
Year Production Began: -ftftfgg2 ASCS Tract No.:
Type of Waste Management System Used: ANAV7,0ke LAGyaN
57oq
zo
:-ores Available for Land AmmlicationA li Waste: 49 AGIX" Cok`fAL
Owner(s) Signature(s):
DATE:
P-FO* J
31- arf
51

State of North Carolina 1;
Department of Environment,
Health cnd Rescurces � AR **A
Y ..141 V
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, ;Secreta
Jonathan B. Howes; Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
November 12, 1993
Harold Smith
Rt. 2 Box 12 B
Pink Hill NC 28572
Dear Mr. Smith,
This is to inform you that your completed registration form required by the recently
modified nondischarge rule has been received by the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM), Water Quality Section.
On December 10, 1992 the Environmental Management Commission adopted a water
quality rule which governs animal waste management systems. The goal of the rule is for animal
operations to be managed such that animal waste is not discharged to surface waters of the state.
The rule allows animal waste systems to be "deemed permitted" if certain minimum criteria are
met (15A NCAC 2H .0217). By submitting this registration you have met one of the criteria for
being deemed permitted.
We would like to remind you that existing feedlots which meet the size thresholds listed
in the rule, and any new or expanded feedlots constructed between February 1, 1993 and
December 31, 1993 must submit a signed certification form to DEM by December 31. 1997.
\ew or expanded feedlots constructed after December 31, 1993 must obtain signed certification
before animals are stocked on the farm. Certification of an approved animal waste
management plan can be obtained after the Soil and Water Conservation Commission adopts
rules later this year.
We appreciate you providing us with this information. If you have any question about
the new nondischarge rule, please contact David Harding at [phone].
Sincerely,
Steve Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carofina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]d96
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer W%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper