Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310227_INSPECTIONS_20171231NO.r AROLIN Department of Environmental Qual I)vrston of O Division of Sod and Water Cottservation O Other Agency Rc Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit & Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number Date of Visit: Time: L_/Un Printed on: 7/21/2000 Q Not Operational Below Threshold 0 Permitted.4 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold . ............ • .. County:......�(/�.L!/1., .Lf.�..0.. Farm Name: ...................ee....,...........y..�....//........................%.....................(.....p.................................... .........../.r...Q...............'../..Q..../ Owner Name:......'........._.j...�................ Phone No:........G7s1..E7......691-40.'J........................ Facility Contact: ..J.tN,�.� !��..__�/.i....�'Q..I L.L........Title�%...\.V...A±'i.O.YR JK�-............n............ Phone No_:/ ................................................. Mailing Address: .... W � .....LJI.C.L.SL. ......!' /..I.%�....Ab................... /..../. fi t %..vG.y....... .11( .............. Z". OnsiteRepresentative: .....................................................L...L................................................. Integrator:...................................................................................... Certified Operator: ...... bwzG,, ��.....LO..L.�..�.LL...__............................. Operator Certification Number:.......................................... Location of Farm: �2 I o8 All of S'2 /5 aq FAWA4 o r -' its e, Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �' ®" Longitude �• ®`" Design Current Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feedei Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Design Current Poultry Capacity Po ulation ❑ Layer ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Other Design Current Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Dairy ❑ Non -Dairy Total Design Capacity Mj Total SSLW I Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lag-nn Area 10 Spray Field Area Holding Ponds / Solid Traps � ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System . Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other �G a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-rnadc?' b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Watet of the State? (If yes, notify DW Q) c. 11 discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon systeni) (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Suucqttur • IN Structure 2 Structure ' .. . Structure 4Structure 5 {. Identifier: ...........V.. ... . Freeboard (inches): 5100 ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes `°G No ❑ Yes OANo ❑ Yes No Structure 6 Continued on back Facility NumbDate of Inspection ! /'3 Printed on: 7/21/2000 .51 Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes XNo 12. Crop type 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes XNo 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes PO No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes XNo 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes No 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? - ❑ Yes ❑ No i4 * atiotis'0i• deficiencies were pbfed I.ditr'irtg this visit' - Ybit w5tl-receive tio: Putther :' cories ondeitce. about: this :visit_ .:....:' : . Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): /57000721 67WPry - A/o .A-0✓lriftQ IIIirVC 4&60Y CoayFiAiL� AlvfgmfpjS Ta dOayl,#C i LYW&e2 �T PRGI� Reviewer/Inspector Name �/K - GULL L JA #1 S' f Wz1 L f/! #1 S Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /C„ Date: 5100 Fac6ity Number: — ZZ Date of Iuspection / r Printed on: 7/21/2000 ,(7dor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below []Yes )d No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a peimanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ Yes V No ❑ Yes 9 No ❑ Yes XNo ❑ Yes 9 No ❑ Yes X No Additional --Comments 'an orDrawings: F"M t S SJIV Y- Z)O-W1,J Ata? 4%WNe/1 S �Oo�, �7%d i/L A4 t It A&& W1 GL A-' COPY of /aVSP, ip wilt , 7'14`tS �/!1L/`'1 l�/! S /3�Qiv /N GtfiC rtn�/ ltirr�/ Of64 F Oe dk� W40,W-,e ' riFr�i> of PJ5;-*A41ff6t) 5A00 General Facility Iriformatlon Facility Number 31 227 .0uplin Owner Dwight L. ill Manager ;John Hair 1659 Kinsey Mill Rd 2VIt. Olive NC 128365 Certified I Hill Farms Inc I Location North of Summerlins Crossroads. On North side of SR 1508 ;office is in trailer on right across the road. Certified Operator in Charge I [Dwight L. Backup Certified Operator �of3a . O OWSRO D 9. Farm J ❑ Inactive operation ❑ Lagoon Closed Date inactivated or closed Type of Operation H Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Sheep ❑ Horses ❑ Goats ❑ None Design Capacity Wumx= 0 Layer N.on Layer Total 400 Swine SSLW 208,800 Farrow to Feeder I Lagoon Total Capacity ft 1 654,707 Subsurface Drains Present Lagoon Area Spray Field Area No Liquid Waste Management System • Latitude 35.1867 35 11 12 Longitude 78.0133 78 00 48 ' ® Request to be removed ® Removal Confirmation Recieved Comments Regional DWQ Staff 0 Division of Soil and Water:Gooservation -Operation Review- - .. '. - ,.*.� � Dinsion of SoB.and WaterConserration-.ComplianceInspechon - - -�DiyisioaofWater - Quality =_ Compliance Inspection 0 Other Agency -Operation Review = - O Routine Complaint A Follow-on of DWO insnection 0 Follow-on of DSWC review 0 Other Facility Number 31 Z 2 Date of Inspection Time of Inspection /0 : !O 24 hr. (hh:mm) E3 Permitted 19Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Not O erational Date Last Operated: Farm Name: H(JJ.....r :f..l!.:t.................:NC'...................................................... County: ........ 3.;4-n.................................. ..... Co......... .........----y�yyy� C pp - Owner Name: ......... .. ........ l�Wighi:...1-i .R.SZ: Phone No: ..... Y1.5..'..kj5Sr.-Y�45� ............................... pt FacilityContact: `�/"�` I ............. Title:..................................... .................... Phone No:._9i...' Mailing Address:..4Q.7......t4l.^St:.t�..... r,.�f..... L�C..... ..JY[.T.......... 1. .......f....lK..r.�.......... .......�b:� t h �� Onsite Representative:. ... t............................................................... Integrator: ....... Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................ : Operator Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude =•=' 0^ Longitude =• =' =" ._ Design Current. - Capacitv Population ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder qioD ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts, ❑ Boars Current, ' Design ❑ Other Total Design Capacity C Total SSLW 'Number of Lagoons - ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area =.I Holding Ponds / Solid Traps - ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System .. Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated Flow in gal/min? T d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes W No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes K No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes rVI No Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Freeboard(inches): ......-1 .............................................................................................................................................................. ................................... 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No seepage, etc.) 3/23/99 Continued on back Facility Number: 31 —221 Date of l nspection l-Z 6. ,ire there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes C4 No (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) - 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes QNo 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? Cl Yes �J\\No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes �(No Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ;9,No 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes KNo 12. Crop type ig)ik S(_' 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes F�I No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? (Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes jgj No Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes r7 No 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? WUP, Yes 14No (ie/ checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes D9 No 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes O No 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes $No 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes A No 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes 12No 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ,,,��H--//No �y No / .. lVci-yiglafit...o .... e... •were ... (I. during this:visit: Yop :will-t&6e a rid futther -:: • - correspondence' about this visit : • :1:........................... . Comments (refer to question #); Explain any YES answers and/orar y recommendations of any otber com_ ments Use drawings of facili to better ex lain situations. use additional a es as;necessa FIlow-uP runs done o.•d WUt WAS rae."r dw�K pft>ww an-eilt.. Pe.,ct J yr wcTirL4-VLk acreAse d/e\�etw,thc.AalQib�,M L 1 T !JY �� rQ'Yi'K I$ �krTL/rr �� Il�l�-d�OTnTO{'W.I 1'21 r�w'.S IW�Q Wte i'l ♦)✓�. 41 T� .SIki.G f�l� -L 1. J•r 5/0 r/[y A46 b�lN dvnF� SACe- Sul-..r-r J9y'l. VVV iawey wi/j be evwd �) f Sue 14rke wom� -;r Advice nn ia5aor� Aosur'c octolurts: �rowcr gs to re _5jPdC -fir '-l1/ In 3 la 5 r5. Reviewer/InspectorName Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 3/23/99 Facility Number: 31 — y Date of Inspection 12-29-`jq Odor Issues Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Ej4e� liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? + X. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes V No ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Yes 5d No ❑ Yes ad No ❑ Yes [9No 3/23/99 Q Division of Soil andMater-Conservation - Operation Review Q.Division of Soil and WaterConserdation -:Compliance Inspection - EDivision of Water Quality - Comphance Inspection Other Agency - Operation Review Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other Facility Number Date of Inspection Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm) 13 Permitted Certified 13 Conditionally [3 Registered Iff Not Operational Date Last Operated: Farm Name: ....... lL...._ '%l!C1.__..... G:.................................................. County:..................(!..........................S.f....:.:•............. Owner Name: .......1../. ��ilV ....... ......lt! lI ._._.. - .......----------_ Phone No: -_I Zl. b7 b..-74fS,1J_ i- r).. Facility Contact: ..../...WljjA......../........t7ffj!.....�.J..�....TitleQ:...............................................,/.........�I'hone No:./��./...........�.,.(�...,../......�. Mailing Address: ..... .�1 v...........J�t.}L:SC.!/...../�/1.��... eLL.................. ... ... ..7.._......... %�.............. •L .... ... 9.J..SG1.... Onsite Representative:....../J................................................................................. Int grator:........... ttC.:.... ....... a . �.+.<e^../................... CertifiedOperator:............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number:.......................................... Location of Farm: Latitude Longitude �• �' �" Design Current;;Design Current Design Current Swine- Capacity Population. Poultry Capacity :Population Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts, ❑ Boars ❑ Other Total Design Capacity Total`SSLW Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No Discharge originated at: [:]Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Ye No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes lyNo 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ly No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: �J Freeboard (inches): ...!!"........................ .. 5. Are there any immedi a threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No seepage, etc.) 3/23/99 Continued on ack Facility Number: — u7 Date of Inspection 'b 6. ) e there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN 12. Crop type 1i9 XYes ❑ No XYes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes Xo ❑ Yes Jallo ❑ Yes ❑ No 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is -facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? �Id vibl'atitiris:oi'� 8ef►ciencies �tvere itgted• ditrritg this:visit; � You w511•i•eoeipe cio further. �: corresporideitt:e:abbuEthis:visit:::�:•::•:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�::�:�:::�:�::�:�:•:�:•::•:•:•:•:•:•:�: any will ke- n1Pa'c �o tart A/r Pt1 wko-. bt; Name ry)q- ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No []Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 'r rer;ew Yccerels. l Svc. ��P� u.�.E✓.� closed Date: 35142V _/ 3/23/99 Facility N! ber:. I — 777 Date of Inspection Odo I ues—� /' .J'ADces the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below es o liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 311.. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes/No ❑ Yes PQo ❑ Yes k No ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ Yes ��.1KO 3/23/99 Division of Soil and Water Conservation [] Other Agency Division of Water Quality Facility Number 3 Date of Inspection Time of Inspection 13 Registered Certified 13 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted Not Operational Farm Namc:.._ .`S ... �1....5........_t................0.18_ ,( `� County:... OwnerName:...........' ................. `. `...................................................................... Phone No: 0 Other -CTT3-- 24 hr. (hh:mm) Date Last Operate to ........................... ....../y� �S ' LILI Sl �--�Y2 Facility Contact: Title: .................... ........................................... Phone No:E1Zi35 Mailing Address: Address :.......... .............. ................... _ ..... C1....................... ......................... Onsite Representative:vy^ Integrator: , . Certified Operator................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:......................................... of rm• .................................f�.! ..:............. ?...................................._M-.................................................................. �4e _:...... .:...(a,,.1...1�............:,.............. SR....Ka.. ......................................... Latitude 0° =, =« Longitude =• =' =11 General 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Wo 2. Is any discharge observed from any pan of the operation? ❑ Yes No Discharge originated at ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? RA d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ;4 No 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pan of the operation? ❑ Yes 51 No 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes " No maintenance/improvement? 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 10 No 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes JA No 7/25/97 aciGty Number. 7.� 1 — �. 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to he properly closed? ❑ Yes\0 No Structures(Laeoons.Holdinp Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.) 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes &No Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier:................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Freeboard (ft):......... : ................................................ ................................... .................................... .................................... ................................ .... 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes N No 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 19 No 12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? 1AYes ❑ No (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes No Waste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes No (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. Crop type ................................................................................................................................................................................ 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes b4No 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes (%No 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes - No 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes EINo 22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes 10 No For Certified or Permitted Facilities Ord 23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes �,{ lb! No 24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes 0 No E3 o.violations•or deficiencies. were iloted during this:visit: You:will receive iio further cdrrespQddepce about 14y 7/25/97 Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Y� t A. N�Date: Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Division of Water Quality IO Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review V Other Date of Inspection 11 11 q9 .�^FcflityNumber' 3 _,•_•21 Time of Inspection � 24 he (hhanm) Registered E3 Certified Q Applied for Permit 0 Permitted JE3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: FarmName: ......... iAAA....... EXAinVmt.................................................................................. County: ..... �i.tl��in........................................ ....................... OwnerName: ....... .V...W..Aki 11.1a........................................................................ Phone No:..... ....................... :.............. Facility Contact: .... blax#.A....... �+'.Al..................................... Title: ........ W.tut'........................................ Phone No:.L'U..0&.4.5. A SJ......... Mailing Address: ...... 1pS...9...... Ki.hScy.... ..... ."..........................................._A�}......a..�,Y.t1.)..AUC......... 1............................?_ ...... Onsite Representative: ....... b-Wa.f k.....t:lll............................................................. Integrator: ... {1�t,4 U14:va.................................p..�............... Certified Operator................................................... J............................................................. Operator Certification Number... Z'-04.X .............. Location of Farm: Latitude =• =, 0" Longitude =• =` =" 3 Design;_Current = -:'Design ,.Current_,,.Des; gu, Current Swine :.' Capacity Population- Poultry _ Capacity �Populahon `Cattle y, m Capacity Population ❑ Wean to Feeder JEI Layer 1 ❑ Dairy ❑ Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Layer I M ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Farrow to Wean 0 Farrow to Feeder IaM ❑Other ❑ Farrow to Finish Total Desigd'Capacity. ❑ Gilts v b ❑ Boars Total SSLWR"'' S Number of Lagoons / HoldingPonds -�.❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area T r" ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System General 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?: b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in eal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than laeoons/holding ponds) require maintenance/improvement? 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 7/25/97 ❑ Yes 10 No ❑ Yes M No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ISM No nl /T ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes - 53 No ❑ Yes ICI No 19 Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No Continued on back Facility Number: -3k 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? Structures (LaSoons.Holding Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.) 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Identifier: Freeboard (ft). .............. 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? Waste Application - 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. Crop type .............. 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 22. Does record keeping need improvement? For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only - 23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? 24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ® No:violations-or deficiencieswere noted duringthis:visit. You'willrmd.;m'nofurther .......................................................... correspondence about this:visit: ❑ Yes 0 No ❑Yes &No is ■ ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes 11No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes KNo ❑ Yes El No ❑ Yes El No ❑ Yes W No 12 Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No tz Ttee. a,� t�ms5.3dhk.ld•-w.�l •s�'toUld dbeUt�u+�auct,) and a grass eSitt6��Sl�J ov. ` bare aweas. C✓ros;o. w eaS o. 00�w ML waft slna�jd 6{ is�lad u+i i�. �(t Y a ruerdei. It�Itit okpk s►'kOJId Ile cA JeJ c J iU 6. vded af-us 64k A IL J (L, clay uJ rtSeedeJ. COOj6V� DiSWjLtt So-1 -+ k3C}O- Fr- aSsrsi"e,• t3. t o,00, SWON " ki�L J (tita, .ttj-(tef �1 u• 5�� records stie�lr) lte 14�F byye�J4uvni?er, tonsfe-f So;l sampjL tunolyscs a a.. ,�-i9Asho Bor` m.a�i D b. 1A a(At., 7/25/97 _ Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: fs • . / . Aj• _ _ _ _ _ Date: Site Requires Immediate Attention: Facility No. -ate Z DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT • ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD DATE: -//— �? , 1995 Time: 2 ; O D DEM Certification Number: ACE Latitude: 3S ° 06 , 03 DEM Certification Number: ACNEW Longitude_=*, '__" Elevation: Feet Circle Yes or No Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches or No Actual Freeboard: 02 Ft. Inches • Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or 6Was anv erosion observed? Yes or 00 Is adequate land available for spray? s or o Is the cover crop adequate?(Vs or No Crop(s) being utilized: i�la v n (-k e0 � Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?Yes or No 100 Feet from Wells? Q or No Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes oki Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes orb Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes or so If Yes, Please Explain. Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific acre/age with cover crop)? Yes or No n Additional Comments: RroQt V l: )1 {�a—�Je(�c/lt �i� t �— !fai 71� • Inspector Name Signature cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.