310182_HISTORICAL_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

10%14/2017 22:20 9102961507 NETHERCUTT
I�
1ioM mlrL V W V12rCu l I % r�Z
Re .. Corikack uAh I r ,elc S farms
ECEIVE
OCT 16 2017
BY' -
PAGE 01

Ir 10/,14/_2017 22:20
,A
9102961507
NETHERCUTT
PAGE 02
October 15, 2017
Triple S Farms & Cleaning, Inc.
PO Box 709
3770 East NC 25 Hwy.
Beulaville, NC 28518
Johnnie R. Smith Eric R. Smith
910-290-2604 910-934-7670
As a representative of Triple S Farms & Cleaning, Inc., I Johnnie R_ Smith do hereby agree to haul waste
water from lagoon on farm owned by: Timmy Nethercutt located in Duplin County as needed.
Date
1 nnie R. Smith, VP
Triple S Farms & Cleaning, Inc.
Date����
Timmy Nethe utt

Powell, David C
From: Nethercutt, Timmy <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 3:07 PM
To: Powell, David C
Subject: Re: [External] RE: 31-182 Lease Agreement
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify that the
attachment and content are safe. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to re{
Called and left a msg. Will let you know soon as I get a call
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: "Powell, David C" <[e-mail]>
Date: 10/13/17 2:58 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: "Nethercutt, Timmy" <[e-mail]>
Cc: "Gregson, Jim" <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: 31-182 Lease Agreement
Ok thank you. I still need that lease agreement today if possible.
Thanks
David Powell, Environmental Specialist
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Wow Reeeaeeen
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Nethercutt, Timmy [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 2:48 PM

,iTo: Powell, David C <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [External] RE: 31-182 Lease Agreement
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify that the
attachment and content are safe. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to report.spam@nc-gov.
Retrieval motor repaired and in place. Have level down to 22"
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: 'Powell, David C" <David.Powellgncdenr.gov>
Date: 10/13/17 2:45 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: "Nethercutt, Timmy" <[e-mail]>
Cc: "Gregson, Jim" <jim. egson e,ncdenr.gov>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: 31-182 Lease Agreement
I need that lease agreement Mr. Nethercutt. All parties involved signing and agreeing to the terms. How long before
your irrigation equipment will be back running?
Thanks
David Powell, Environmental Specialist
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
n
iiQlfrr f.'e`fGtfrCH
• ...Orr,w��t l.Jv�.
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Nethercutt, Timmy[mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 2:40 PM
To: Powell, David C <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [External] RE: 31-182 Lease Agreement
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify that the
attachment and content are safe. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to report.spam@nc.¢ov.

Have not. Will get with Johnny and let you know status
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: "Powell, David U <David.Powell@ncdencgov>
Date: 10/13/17 2:33 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: "Nethercutt, Timmy"<tnethercutt(c�r�,smithfield.com>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: 31-182 Lease Agreement
I have not received the lease agreement. Have you got it yet?
Thanks
David Powell, Environmental Specialist
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
lt'nfn �'eic<rrcr>
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Nethercutt, Timmy[mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 3:13 PM
To: Powell, David C <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: 31-182 Lease Agreement
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify that the
attachment and content are safe. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to [e-mail].
Have call gentleman w/USDA. Will be 2 weeks before he can come by.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Tablet
Original message

From: 'Powell, David C" <[e-mail]>
Date: 10/12/2017 2:00 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: "Nethercutt, Timmy" <tnethercuttQsmithfield.com>
Cc: "Gregson, Jim" <]im.gre sg onkncdenr.gov>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: 31-182 Lease Agreement
Thank you much, It also needs your dads signature to agree to accept the waste if he is going to accept it.
Thanks
David Powell, Environmental Specialist
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
n -
Ware, Seldo cen
1111 01✓kA t.( L1', I,
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Nethercutt, Timmy fmailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 1:59 PM
To: Powell, David C <David.Powell(a)ncdenr.¢ov>
Subject: [External] RE: 31-182 Lease Agreement
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify that the
attachment and content are safe. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to reaort.soam(onc.¢ov.
Have talked back with Johnny Smith and he said he would have me something tomorrow am. Will pick up for
him and email or fax it to you. Thanks
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Tablet
-------- Original message --------
From: 'Powell, David C" <David.Poweling,ncdenr.gov>
Date: 10/11/2017 4:29 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: "Nethercutt, Timmy" <[e-mail]>
Subject: 31-182 Lease Agreement
Hey Mr. Nethercutt,

Please send me a copy of that lease agreement ASAP.
Thanks
David Powell, Environmental Specialist
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Rblor Qf)Gfi•Cb
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.
This communication (including any attachments) is confidential and is intended to be privileged pursuant to applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient. or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, then you are hereby notified that the dissemination, distribution
or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Smithfield Foods. Inc. immediately by telephone
([phone]) and then delete this communication and destroy all copies thereof.
This communication (including any attachments) is confidential and is intended to be privileged pursuant to applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, then you are hereby notified that the dissemination, distribution
or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Smithfield Foods, Inc. immediately by telephone
([phone]) and then delete this communication and destroy all copies thereof.
This communication (including any attachments) is confidential and is intended to be privileged pursuant to applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, then you are hereby notified that the dissemination, distribution
or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Smithfield Foods, Inc. immediately by telephone
(+ 1757-365-3000) and then delete this communication and destroy all copies thereof.
This communication (including any attachments) is confidential and is intended to be privileged pursuant to applicable law If you are not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, then you are hereby notified that the dissemination, distribution
or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Smithfield Foods, Inc. immediately by telephone
([phone]) and then delete this communication and destroy all copies thereof.
This communication (including any attachments) is confidential and is intended to be privileged pursuant to applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, then you are hereby notified that the dissemination, distribution
or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Smithfield Foods, Inc. immediately by telephone
([phone]) and then delete this communication and destroy all copies thereof.

PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number:
31-182
County: Duplin
Facility Name: Limestone Creek
Certified Operator Name: Timmy Nethercutt Operator Number:
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top ofthe dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
17
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30`day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
'Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
"if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: as conditions permit
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above, and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the Information is
accurate and correct.
Phone:
(print)
iG

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure ID: Lagoon 1 line m = 231.5 lb PAN
2. Structure ID: Lagoon 2 line m = lb PAN
3. Structure ID: Eugene line m = lb PAN
4. Structure ID: line m = lb PAN
5. Structure ID: line m = lb PAN
6. Structure ID:
line m = lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 231.5lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PFRInn nn NnT I IST Fan nS Tn WHICM PAN CANNDT RE APPLIED DARING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(lbraoie)
L TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
pull 1
Bermuda
2.29
250.00
572.5
March -Sept
pull 2
Bermuda
0.71
250.00
177.5
Mardi -Sept
pull 3
Bermuda
1.26
250.00
315.0
March -Sept
pull
Bermuda
1.991
300.00
597.0
March -Sept
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 1662.0 lb. PAN
_IV..FACILrMS PoA.OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 231.5 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

a
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = 1662.0 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -1430 lb. PAN
y must show as a deficit If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
d on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
o to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
ier permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed. Will be hauling water to facility 31-692, Eugene Nethercutt
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

Steven W. Troxler
Commissioner
Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
1068 Dobson Chapel Rd.
Magnolia, NC 28453
July 26, 2016
Dear Mr. Nethercutt
North Carolina Department of Agriculture
and Consumer Services
Agronomic Division
Dr. Colleen Hudak -Wise
Director
At your request, I visited your Limestone Creek Farm, Facility 31-182, off NC I I I just north of East Duplin High School,
during the week of July 11, 2016. Your father met me at the site. The purpose was to assess the vegetative condition of the
hayfields receiving effluent applications, and produce agronomic recommendations regarding their management and
compliance. My findings are a professional opinion only; the NCDA&CS Agronomic Division has no regulatory enforcement
authority. My findings will be shared with the NCDENR Division of Water Resources, however.
I found that the bermudagrass stands were almost non-existent. There was some remnant bermudagrass in spots, mostly on the
field borders, but there was little to none across the field centers where waste is applied. In my opinion, the site should be
completely renovated to bring it into compliance with the terms of the WUP. I was hoping to find enough bermudagrass to be
able to salvage the stand with a combination ofjudicious mowing and a herbicide application, but that, unfortunately, was not
the case.
At the time of the visit, I did not have access to the WUP for the farm, so a cursory check of the soil type using the Soil Web
phone app suggested it was a Marvyn Series; I believe that to be inaccurate, as the Marvyn-Gritney soil comples, as mapped in
Duplin county has slopes of 6 to 15 percent, and though the surrounding upland terrain may have such slopes, the fields clearly
do not. I suspect due to their small size, they are simply soil inclusions within a larger mapping unit. Also, there appeared to be
a wetness problem and high water table that would not be associated with that soil type. Therefore I don't have valid
information as to soil type, and was unable to identify it via the MRCS Web Soil Survey. If the information can be provided to
me from the WUP, I can better formulate a recommendation.
However, the site clearly has a high water table and wetness issues. Therefore, it is not a site well -suited to hybrid
bermudagrass in my opinion. I suggest having a soil scientist from the Division of Soil and Water Conservation better class the
soils in those specific fields to confirm my general observation. If I am correct, I believe you would benefit from having a
technical specialist rewrite the WUP and make a crop change to a cycle of annuals; small gain (silage) sown in the fall and
harvested as balage in April, followed by a sorghum-sudan hybrid, or pearl millet, sown in May and harvested twice as balage
during the summer. The selected summer annual could also be replanted during its production season, if needed, should some
stand damage occur.
For now, I suggest continuing to harvest the existing crop until mid -August. Allow a few inches of regrowth, then apply a
glyphosate herbicide (Roundup or generic) at 2 Ib/A a.i. (2 quarts/acre of a 4L product) in order to destroy the existing
vegetation. Two applications may be needed. It is important to reduce the pressure from the nutsedge and vaseygrass on the
site. Once the vegetation has been killed, prepare the land with a thorough tillage, using the opportunity to shape or plane the
fields to eliminate any wet pockets and establish a uniform slope. After the land shaping, soil test for possible lime or fertilizer
needs and then sow a small grain as a silage crop by mid -October.
1040 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1040
[phone] 0 Fax [phone]
TTY: 1-800-735-2962 Voice: 1-877-735-8200
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

The application rates may be based off your currently given soil types, but I think it would be a good idea, as 1 said earlier, to
have those confirmed by a soil scientist with DS WC. However, if you can provide me with the soil types listed on WUP, I can
better assess the PAN utilization and preferred crops.
Next spring, a decision can be made as to whether to reestablish bermudagrass or to convert to an annual forages rotation. If
my impression of the water table and drainage conditions is correct, I think the latter will be a more successful system than the
former. Please call if 1 can be of further service.
Sincerely yours,
Tim Hall
Regional Agronomist
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division
[phone]

Revised August 2008
. Appendix 1. Lagoon Sludge Survey Form
A. Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number
I. Timmy Nethercutt Start
B. Lagoon Identification , Front Lagoon Present
C. Person(s) Taking Measurements Amanda Hatcher & Savannah Wiggins Stop
D. Date of Measurement 5/31116 Bottom
E. Methods/Devioes Used for Measurement of: 3:1 SS
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer. 130 ft x 125 ft
Disk on a rope
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soil) of the lagoon. 26 in or 2.2 ft FB
4.1
44.4
43.9
42.6
35.1
Lagoon design
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler".
NIA
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): 0.37 (acres) Nsuyt5��
(Draw a sketch of the lagoon on a separate sheet, list dimensions, and calculate surface area. The lagoon I 2 3 4
may have been built different than designed, so measurements should be made.)
G. Estimate number of sampling points: I /
a. Less than 1.33 acres: Use 8 points
b. If more then 1.33 ac. acres x 6 = , with maximum of 24.
(Using sketch and dimensions, develop a uniform grid that has the some number of intersections as the
estimated number of sampling points needed. Number the Intersection points on the lagoon gdd so that data
recorded at each can be easily matched.)
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Sheer (Appendix 2). Also, at the
location of the pump Intake, take measurements of distance from liquid surface to top of sludge
layer and record It on the Data Sheet (last rout); this must be at least 2.5 ft. when Irrigating.
I. At the time of the survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the Present Liquid
Level (measure at the lagoon gauge pole): 0.5
J. Determine the distance from the top of bank to the Maximum Liquid Level 1.7
(use lagoon management plan or other lagoon records)
K. Determine the distance from the Maximum Liquid to the Minimum Liquid level: 1.8
(use lagoon management plan or other lagoon records)
L. Calculate the distance from the present liquid surface level to the Minimum Liquid Level 1.3
- (Item K Minus Item I, assuming the present liquid level Is below the Maximum Liquid Level)
M. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level to the
lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points) 8.8
N. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level to the top
of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points} 5.6
O. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer. 3.2
P. Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone (Item N minus Item L): 4.3
Q. If Item 0 Is theater than Item P. proceed to the Workshest for Sludge Volume and Treatment Volume. �' 0
If Item O Is equal to or less than Item P, you do not have to determine volumes.
Completed by: Amanda HatchedNCCES-Du IIn1910-296-2143 Date: ( W16
- Print Name /Signature

Appendix 2. sludge Survey Data Sheet• Revised August 2008
Lagoon Identification_ 1. Timmy Nethercutt Front Lagoon
Completed by: Amends Hatcher
Print Name
&
Signature
6/8/16
(A)
(B)
(C)
(C)-(B)
Grid Point
Distance from liquid surface
Distance from liquid surface
Thickness of sludge layer
No.
to top of sludge
to laaoon bottom soil
Ft. & in.
Ft tenths
Ft. 8 in.
Ft. tenths
Ft. 8 in.
Ft. tenths
1
5.5
8.8
3.3
2
4.0
8.8
4.8
3
5.5
8.8
3.3
4
5.2
8.8
3.6
5
4.5
8.8
4.3
6
7.0
8.8
1.8
7
5.0
8.8
3.8
8
8.0
8.8
0.8
9
0.0
0.0
0.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
11
0.0
0.0
0.0
12
0.0
0.0
0.0
13
0.0
0.0
0.0
14
0.0
0.0
0.0
15
0.0
0.0
0.0
16
0.0
0.0
0.0
17
0.0
0.0
0.0
18
0.0
0.0
0.0
19
0.0
0.0
0.6
20
0.0
0.0
0.0
21
0.0
0.0
0.0
22
0.0
0.0
0.0
23
0.0
0.0
0.0
24
0.0
0.0
0.0
Number of points with readings
8.0
X X
8.0
X X
BA
Average of
X X
5.0
X X
8.8
X X
3.2
points
At pump
5.0
X X X X X X
intake
*All Grid Points and corresponding a layer thicknesses must be shown on a sketch attached to this
Sludge Survey Data Sheet.
Appendix 3. Worksheet for sludge volume and treatment volume
Revised August 2008
The average thickness of the sludge layer and the thickness of the existing liquid (sludge -free) treatment zone are determined
from the information on the Lagoon Sludge Survey Farm ( Items 0 and P, respectively). In this example, the average sludge

layer thickness Is 2.5 feet and the existing liquid treatment zone Is 3.5 feet. If the lagoon has a designed sludge storage volume,
see notes at and of the worksheet. The dimensions of the lagoon as measured and the side slope are needed
far calculations of sludge volume and of total treatment volume. If the lagoon is a standard geometric shape, the sludge
volume aril the treatment volume in the lagoon can be estimated by using standard equations. For approximate volumes
of rectangular lagoons with constant side slope, calculate length and width at the midpoint of the layer, and multiply by layer
thickness to calculate layer volume, ea shown In the example. For Irregular shapes, convert the total surface area to a square
or rectangular shape. For exact volumes for lagoons with constant side slope, the'Prismoklal Equations" may be used.
• Example
Your Lagoon
1. Average sludge Layer Thickness (T)
2.5
ft.
3.2
ft.
2. Depth of the lagoon from top of bank to bottom sob surface (D)
11
ft.
11.0
ft.
3. Slope = Horizontal/ vertical side slope (S)
3
3.0
4. Length at the top of inside bank (L)
457
ft.
130.0
ft.
5. Width at top Inside slope (W)
229
fl.
125.0
ft.
6. Length at midpoint of sludge layer L. = L-28(D-(T2))
398.5
ft.
73.6
ft.
7. Width at midpoint of sludge layer W„= W-2S(D-(T/2))
170.5
ft,
68.6
ft.
8. Volume of sludge (Vs) Vs--L, W,„ T
169,860
ft,
16,157
ft
9. Volume In gallons: V%=V'7.5 gal./ft".
1,273,950
gal.
121,175
gal.
10. Thickness of existing liquid tmt. zone (Y)
3.5
ft
4.3
ft
11. Thickness of total treatment zone (Z) Z= T+Y
6
ft
7.5
ft
12. Length at midpoint of total brit. zone L■ = L-2(S)(D4Z/2) -
409
it.
86.5
ft.
13. Width at midpoint of total tmL Zane W, = W-2(S)(D-(Z/2)
181
ft.
81.5
ft.
14. Volume of total treatment zone (Vz) Vz = L, W:Z
444,174
11
52.873
fts
15. Ratio ( R ) of sludge layer volume to total Treatment Volume
R = VsNz 0.38 0.31
If the ratio R exceeds 0.50, than a sludge Plan of Action may be required. Check with DWQ for Information
on filing the Plan of Action.
Note: If the lagoon has a designed sludge storage volume (DSSV), subtract that volume from troth the volume
of sludge (Vs) (Item 8) and from the volume of total treatment zone (Vz) (Item 14). and take the ratio.
Then, R = (Vs-DSSV) / (Vz - DSSV)
Example: If DSSV = 85,000 fe, then R = (169,860 - 85,000) / (444,174 - 85,000) = 64,860 / 359,174 = 0.24.
16. Design sludge storage volume (DSSV) - 85,000 0
17. Ratio (R) of sludge layer volume to treatment volume adjusted
for designed sludge storage volume - 0.24 0.31

l Appendix 1. Lagoon Sludge Survey Form Revised August 2008
Tap 1 46.1
A. Farm Permit or DWO Identification Number 1. Timmy Netharcutt Start 44.4
B.Lagoon Identification Back Lagoon Present 43.9
C. Person(s) Taking Measurements Amanda Hatcher & Savannah Wiggins Stop 42.6
D. Date of Measurement 5/31/16 Bottom 35.1
E. Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of: 3:1 SS
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer. 130 It x 125 ft
Disk on a rope
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (add) of the lagoon. 26 in or 2.2 ft FB
Lagoon design
c- Thickness of the sludge layer If making a direct measurement with "core sampler".
N/A
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): 0.37 (acres) T �✓
(Draw a sketch of the lagoon on a separate sheet, list dimensions, and calculate surface area The lagoon
may have been built different than designed, so measurements should be made.) pz
G. Estimate number of sampling points:
a. Less then 1.33 acres: Use 8 points
b. If more than 1.33 so. acres x 6 = , with maximum of 24.
(Using sketch and dimensions, develop a uniform gdd that has the some number of intersections as the
estimated number of sampling points needed. Number me Intersection points on the lagoon grid so that dale
recorded at each can be easily matched.)
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Shest" (Appendix 2). Also, at the
location of the pump Intake, take measurements of distance from liquid surface to top of sludge
layer and record It on the Data Sheet (last row); this must be at least 2.5 ft. when irrigating.
I. At the time of the survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the Present Liquid
Level (measure at the lagoon gauge pole):
J. Detemdne the distance from the top of bank to the Maximum Liquid Level
(use lagoon management plan or other lagoon records)
K. Determine the distance from the Maximum Liquid to the Minimum Liquid level:
(use lagoon management plan or other lagoon records)
L. Calculate the distance from the present liquid surface level to the Minimum Uquld Level
(Item K Minus Item 1, assuming the present liquid level Is below the Maximum Liquid Level)
M. Record from lho.Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level to lire
lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points)
N. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Shoal the distance from the present liquid surface level to the top
of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points):
O. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer:
4m - +T) s 04e—
S
�
-1
�
I
a
3
4
130,
q/
RZY (Oful
0.5
1.7
1.8
1.3
8.8
5.3
3.5
P. Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone (Item N minus Item L): 4.0
O. If Item O Is greater than Item P. proceed to the Worksheet for Sludge Volume and Treatment Volume.
If Item O is equal to or less then Item P. you do not have to determine volumes.
Completed by. Amanda Hatcher/NCCES-0uplin/910-298-2143 Date: f�8/8/116 1/�
Print Name /Signature a ,,,,, . A � J-J, ,.J.., /, _ - _ � ,,t�,J�'�
'`6t,a-

Appendix 2. Sludge Survey Data Sheet* Revised August 2008
Lagoon Identification_ I. Timmy Nethercu8, Back Lagoon
Completed by: Amanda Hatcher Date: 6/8/16
Print Name Signature
(A)
(B)
(C)
(C)-(B)
Grid Point
Distance from liquid surface
Distance from liquid surface
Thickness of sludge layer
No.
to top of scuda
to la oon bottom soil
Ft. & in.
Ft. tenths
Ft. Mn.
Ft, tenths
R. & In.
Ft. tenths
1
6.0
8.8
2.8
2
6.0
8.8
2.8
3
3.0
8.8
5.8
4
3.0
8.8
5.8
5
6.0
8.8
2.8
6
7.0
8.8
1.8
7
6.0
8.8
2.8
8
5.0
8.8
3.8
9
0.0
0.0
0.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
11
0.0
0.0
0.0
12
0.0
0.0
0.0
13
0.0
0.0
0.0
14
0.0
0.0
0.0
15
0.0
0.0
0.0
16
0.0
0.0
0.0
17
0.0
0.0
0.0
18
0.0
0.0
0.0
19
0.0
0.0
0.0
20
0.0
0.0
0.0
21
0.0
0.0
0.0
22
0.0
0.0
0.0
23
0.0
0.0
0.0
24
0.0
0.0
0.0
Number of pointswith readin s
&0
X X
8.0
X X
8.0
Average of
X X
5.3
X X
8.8
X X
3.5
points
At pump
5.0
X X X X X X
Intake
'All Grid Points and corresponding sludge layer thicknesses must be shown on a sketch attached to this
Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Appendix 3. Worksheet for sludge volume and treatment volume
Revised August 2008
The average thickness of the sludge layer and the thickness of the existing liquid (sludge -free) treatment zone are determined
from the Information on the lagoon Sludge Survey Form ( Items 0 and P, respectively). In this example, the average sludge

layer thickness Is 2.5 feet and the existing liquid treatment zone Is 3.5 feet. If the lagoon has a designed sludge storage volume,
see notes at and of the worksheet. The dimensions of the lagoon as measured and the side slope are needed
for calculations of sludge volume and of total treatment volume. If the lagoon is a standard geometric shape, the sludge
volume and the treatment volume in the lagoon can be estimated by using standard equations. For approximate volumes
of rectangular lagoons with constant side slope, calculate length and width at the midpoint of the layer, and multiply by layer
thickness to calculate layer volume, as shown in the example. For irregular shapes, convert the total surface area to a square
or rectangular shape. For exact volumes for lagoons with constant side slope, the "Prismoidal Equations" may be used.
Example
Ykxx Lagoon
1. Average sludge Layer Thickness (T)
2.5
ft.
3.5
ft.
2. Depth of the lagoon from top of bank to bottom soli surface (D)
11
ft.
11.0
ft.
3. Slope = Horizontal/ vertical side slope (S)
3
3.0
4. Length at the top of inside bank (L)
457
R
130.0 -
ft.
5. Width at top inside slope (W)
229
ft.
125.0
ft.
6. Length at midpoint of sludge layer Lm = L-2S(D{T/2))
398.5
ft.
74.5
ft.
7. Width at midpoint of sludge layer Wm= W-2S(D-(T/2))
170.5
ft.
69.5
It.
8. Volume of sludge (Val Vs=Lin Wm T
16�60
to
18.122
fP
9. Volume In gallons: Vr4=V"7.5 gal./fO.
1,273,950
gal.
135,916
gel.
10. Thickness of existing liquid tmL zone (Y)
3.5
ft
4.0
ft
11. Thickness of total treatment zone (Z) Z= T+Y
6
ft
7.5
ft
12. Length at midpoint of total tint. zone L. = L-2(S)(D-(Z/2)
409
ft.
66.5
ft.
13. Width at midpoint of total tint. Zone W: = W-2(S)(D-(Z/2)
181
ft.
81.5
ft.
14. Volume of total treatment zone (Vz) Vz = L. W=Z
_ 444,174
R°
52,873
ft
15. Ratio ( R ) of sludge layer volume to total Treatment Volume
R = Vs/Vz
0.38
0.34
If the ratio R exceeds 0.50, than a sludge Plan of Action may be required. Check with DWQ for Information
on filing the Plan of Action.
Note: If the lagoon has a designed sludge storage volume (DSSV), subtract that volume from both the volume
of sludge (Vs) (Item 8) and from the volume of total treatment zone (Vz) (Item 14), and take the ratio.
Than, R = (Vs-DSSV) / (Vz - DSSV)
Example: If DSSV = 85,000 (0, then R = (169,860 - 86,000) / (444,174 - 85,000) = 84,860 / 359.174 = 0.24.
16. Design sludge storage volume (DSSV) 85,000 0
17. Ratio (R) of sludge layer volume to treatment volume adjusted
for designed sludge storage volume 0.24 0.34

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer:IVEY TIMOTHY NETHERCUTT
Location: PO BOX 702
RENANSVILLE NC 28349
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Wean to Feeder Swine
Number of Animals: 3552.00 pigs
(Design capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown
and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more
nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or
when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may
result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
3552 pigs x .40 tors waste/pigs/year='1420.8 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
3552 pigs x .48 lbs PAN/pigs/year = 1704.96 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
DETERMINING PHASE
CROP.
CODE
YIELD
LBS
AW N
COMM N
PER
**
ACRES
* LBS
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
5817
P1
MKA
BH
4.5
225
2.29
515.25
I
+MAR_
V \.11J
58-7
-Pi
SG
1
50
2.29
114.5
I
+SEP-
APR
5817
P2
LUA
BH
4.5
225
0.71
159.75
I
+MAR
OCT15
5817
-P2
SC
50
0.71
35.5
I
11
+SEP-
APR
5817
P3
LUA
BH
4.5
225
1.26
283.5
I
+ MAR-
OCT15
5817
-P3
SG
i
50
1.25
63
T
+SEP-
APR
5817
P4
MCC
BH
6.0
300
1.99
597
I
I
+MAR-
OCT15
5817
-P4
SG
i
50
1.99
199.5
J+SEP-
APR
END
T
TOTAL11868
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e,
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
- Dates shown reflect optimum uptake periods for nutrients. Waste
appilcation may begin up to thirtv(30) days prior to planting or
green -up of forages, and extend past optimum dates shown if
plant growth, pumping conditions, and PAN loading rates permit.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that
meeting the N requirements.
require farmers in some parts
nutrient management plan that
plan only addresses nitrogen.
P and K may be over applied while
In the future, regulations may
of North Carolina to have a
addresses all nutrients. This
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
Dates shown reflect optimum uptake periods for nutrients. Waste
application may begin up to thirty(30) days prior to planting or
green -up of forages, and extend past optimum dates shown if
plant growth, pumping conditions, and PAN loading rates permit.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to jet small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
Silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen.
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE.
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
SG
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
TONS
AC
50
50
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
6.25
0
6.25
LES AW N USED
1868
0
1868
-163 . 04
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
***. This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 269.952 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 1349.76
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 4.4992 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 10.79808 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25a depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
I
Tract I Field
5817
P1.
I �
5817
P2
� I
5817
P3
� I
5817
P4
� I
5817
-P1
I I
5817
I -P2
� I
5817
-P3
I I
5817
_Pa
1
Soil Type
1741
LUA
LUA
MCC
Crop
BH
BH
M6.I
341
SG
SG
SG
SG
IApnlication RatelApplic. Amount
(in/hr) I (inches)
I
�
.5
�
*1.0
I
.50
*1.0
.50
*1.0
.50
�
*1.0
I
. .5
�
*1
I
.5
I
*1
I
•5
*1
.5
�
*1
I
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. in many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because-of.the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
application amount shown.can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is.the responsibility,of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct. rates to the acres shown in Tables i and 2. Failure to apply
the.recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount .of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
PHIS WUP IS WRITTEN BASED ON A WETTED ACRES FOOTPRINT COMPLETED BY BILLY
HOUSTON OF DUPLIN SOIL AND WATER(SEE ATTACHED).
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
_there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The ootential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 1.00 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
la. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of.
all waste treatment lagoons.. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:LIMESTONE CREEK FARM(31-182)
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility
(Please print)
Signature:
Name o
Signature:
IVEY TIMOTHY NETHERCUTT
different
Date:
owner) :
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)BILLY W. HOUSTON
Affiliation:DUPLIN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Phone No. 910-296-2120
Address (Agency): PO BOX 219
KENANSVILLE NC 28349
Signature: IV ��t� Date:
Page: 13

D-W-1
Murphy -Brown LLC
Fax
Murphy -Brown Uc Cover Sheet
Kcnaosvillc
78S Hwy 24150 East Phone: (910) 296-Ve6
Warsaw, NC 28398 Fax: [phone]
Date: O 2- Z - L�
To:
From:
Regarding: Ge F
Number of pages (incduding cover sheet)
MAR 6 1 2011
90/10 39Vd VLOT96ZOT61 01:91 TTOZ/8Z/ZO

Appendix 1. Lagoon Sludge Survey Dorm Revised August 2008
� f$L 1—
A Farm por�mit or DWQ Tdcnlificatioil Number t rT ✓t1lVk�t ( c V1-,rccA,+
J
B. Lagoon Identification t
An
C. Person(s) Taking Measurements
D. Date of Measurements
E. Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of:
f
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer:
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soil) of the lagoon:
St
kuti 0 OD
_
c. Thickn g of the sludge layer if making a d Toct measurementwith `bore sampler':
NIA
P. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside. top of bank): � "l y (acres) i a5'
(Draw a sketch of the lagoon on a separate sheet, list dimensions, and calculate surface area. The.lagoon may
have been built different than designed, so measurements should be made.) arj''FP,
G. Estimatenumberofsamplingpoints: 1 1G,
a. Less than 1.33 acres: Use 8 points T6��
b. if more than 1.33 acres, acres x 6 = , with maximum of 24.
(Using sketch and dimensions, develop a uniform grid that has the same number of intersections as the
estimated number of sampling points ieeded. Number the intersection points on the lagoon grid so that
data recorded at each can be easily matched.)
Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Sheet" (Appendix 2). A Iso, at the location of
the pump intake, take measurement of distance from liquid surface to top of sludge layer and record it
on the Data Sneet (last row); this must be at least 2.5 ft. when irrigating.
1. At the time of the sludge survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the Present
Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gauge pole): 10.LA
1
J. Determine the distance from the lop L4 (0, top of back to the Maximum Liquid Level � � 7 5��� 4 Li y
(use lagoon management plan or other lagoon re olds) n
K. Determine the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the Minimum Liquid Level _ . g 7f ems+ 1{4.
(use lagoon management plan or otherlagoonrecords) S'tnTp 42 to
L. Calculate the distance from the present liquid surface level to the Minimum Liquid T.evel 1.14
(Item K minus Item [,assuming the present liquid level is below the Maximum Liquid Level).
M. Record from the Sludge Survey Data .'beer the distance from the present liquid surface level to The lagoon
bottom (average for ail the measurement points): IF. j
N. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Shcct the distance from the present liquid surface level to the top of the
sludge layer (average for all the measurement points): LL - —)i
0. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer:4, S
P. Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone (I te m N minus Item L) ol•
Q. It Item 0 is greater than Item P, ploceeu to the Worksheet for Sludge volume and Treatment Volume. �7P
If Item 0 is equal to or less than Item P, you do not have to determine volumes.
Completed
Print Name te:
Signature
AICer S-1)t..Pl;., Co Cf,-
90/ZO 39Cd OLP196ZO161 0i:,9t itOZ/8Z/Z0

Appendix 2. Sludge Survey. Data Sheet" Revised August 2008
A
Lagoon Identification:
Completed by: A7Yan. la-71—i o
Print Name Signature
(A)
Grid
Point
No.
(B)
Distance from liquid
surface to top of sludge
(C)
Distance from liquid surface
to lagoon bottom (soil)
(C) minus(B)
Thickness of sludge layer
Ft. 8 in,
Ft tenths
Ft & in.
Ft. tenths
Ft. & in.
Ft. tenths
2
4. zt.
q.
q.
3
s
a
,-7
4
5
6
3.
1
S• 3
7
T-7
3.-7
8
9.3
1
4-5-
9
3.7
Y.S7
y.
10
a.s
s•-/
6. a
+1
LV9
9.5
4.
12
4.9
-7.
13
5-0
/1.0
14
10,3
11.0
. 7
,5
8:7
a.7
16
3• /
10.0
4.9
17
S
10.3
S. /
,e
ss
.9
Y,
2
To
'79.
!
gs .
Number of points with
readings
X
14)
X
Average
of
oink
4- 2
g
,I
-
At
Pump
intake
5'
X
X
X
X
*AD Grid Points and corresponding sludge laver thicknesses must be shown on a sketch attached
to this Sludge Survey Data Sheet. See Appendix 4 for conversion from inches to tenths of a foot.
90/EO 3E)Vd VLV196ZO161 01:91 TTOZ/BZ/ZO

The average thickness of the sludge layer and the thickness of the existing liquid (sludge -free) treatment
zone (are determined from information on the Lagoon Sludge Survey Form (Items O and P, respectively).
—� In this example, the average sludge layer thickness is 2.5 feet and the existing liquid treatment zone is 3.5
feet. It the lagoon has a designed sludge storage volume, see notes at end 01 the worksheet. The
dimensions of the lagoon as measured and the side slope are needed for calculations of sludge volume,
and of total treatment volume. If the lagoon is a standard geometric shape, the sludge volume and
treatment volume in the lagoon can be estimated by using standard equations- For approximate volumes
of rectangular lagoons with constant side slope, calculate length and width at the midpoint of the layer,
and multiply by layer thickness to calculate layer volume, as shown in the examp)e. For irregular shapes,
convert the total, surface area fo a square or rectangular shape. For exact volumes for lagoons with
constant side slope, the " Prismoidal Equations" may be usod.
Example
Your lagoon
1.
Average Sludge Layer Thickness (T)
2.5 ft.
L4 . S
2.
Depth of lagoon from top of bank
to bottom soil surface (D)
11 ft.
3.Slope=borizontal/vertical
side slope (S)
3
7J E� �SSkiv.Ga
Q.
Length at top inside bank (L)
457 ft.
l3D X oZ
S.
Width at top inside bank (W)
229 fc,
oZs
6.
Length at midpoint of sludge layer
L„=L-2S(D-(T/2))
398.5ft.
�orl-S
3 trit-(q.S/a
7.
Width at midpoint of sludge layer
W=W-2S(D—(T/2)
1705ft.
8•
Volume of sludge (Vs):
Vs=L.W.T
169,860fl?
Q
(07tp9(p, /
9.
Volume in gallons:
Vsi=V * 7.5 gal,/ft'.
1,273.950 gal.
10.
Thickness of existing liquid twit. Zone (Y)
3.5 : t.
. g
11.
Thickness of total treatment zone (Z)
6.0 ft.
7..3
Z=T+Y
(Appendix 3 continued on next page)
90/bO 39Vd tIL17T96ZO16T OT:9T TTOZ/8Z/ZO

12. Length at midpoint of total trot, zone
Lz=L-2(S) (Z✓) I
at.o-a�3�14-0 3 a)3
13, Width at .midpoint of total tort. zone
Wz = W — 2(S) (D -- (Z/2)
14. Volume of total treatment zone (Vz)
Vz=Lz WzZ
.21S9)eYD.9x73
0 Ratio (R) of sludge layer volume to total
Treatment volumc
409 ft. A I S. 9
181 ft. YO. 9
444,174 ft3 /027 �Dy
R=VS/Vz (o-7�9fp.9 0.38 S3�Jo
/a7 S D y . (
If the ratio exceeds 0.50, than a sludge Plan of Action may be required. Check with
D W p for information on filing the Plan of Action,
Note: If the lagoon has a designed sludge storage volume (DSSV), subtract that volume from
both the volume of sludge (Vs) (Item 8) and from the volume of total treatment Zone (Vz) (Item
14), and take the ratio:
R= (Vs — DSSV) / (Vz — DSSV)
Example: If DSSV = 85,000 ft3, then R = (169,860 — 85,000) / (447,174 85,000)
R = 84,860 / 362,174 = 0.23
0
90/90 39Vd VLV196ZOTGT OT:9T TTOZ/BZ/ZO

PLAN OF ACTION
FOR THE REDUCTION OF
LAGOON SLUDGE
Due to the increase in the amount of sludge from 2009 to 2010, an attempt to reduce the
sludge level will be made. There may be lowered levels of anaerobic activity in the
lagoon resulting in this increase since previous sludge removal within the past 5 years.
1) Ptrchme of micmhials to add to the lagoon to increase anaerobic activity.
2) Agitate the lagoon with a PTO driven unit so as to mix in the additives and help
with the anaerobic activity.
3) Monitor the ph of lagoon samples for any adjustments that need to be made.
4) Resurvey the sludge levels within 6 months of starting this process.
Have spoken with Amanda Hatcher (NCCES-DUPLIN COUNTY) for any suggestions
and to rmonduct the sludge survey.
PLAN OF ACTION
FOR THE REMOVAL OF
LAGOON SLUDGE
If the attempt to reduce sludge levels with additives and agitation does not work
sufficiently, land application will be the action taken. Have spoken with another farmer
who tcnds row crops in the immediate area about the possibility of sludge application as
alternative to commercial fertilizer for either corn, wheat, or soy beans depending on
which crop he plans to use and the time of year for proper crop.
Facility 431-182
Owner: Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Phone # [phone] or 910-271-2478
90/90 39Vd VLDT96NT6T 0T:9T TT07/8Z/L0

■ Complete Items 1, 2, and: Also complete
item 4 If Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailplece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Mr. z✓ey Timo�iy ,yew, -mot
mLS�L c.rGG�%ar/Vt
❑ Agent
D. Is delNery address d'' f wd from Rem 17 u TM
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
,q 3. E
rYPa0med Mall ❑ Express Mail
lstmeRatum Receipt for Me chandlse
�35� ed Mal C.O.D.
kenaASv rlle/ 4.ted Delivery? (Ecva Fee) _ Yes
z. ArticleNumbe 7006 2760 0003 3528
9233
(fiansrer Horn serwm mwr
tozsssm-M-tsao
Return Receipt
ps Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic

.,..rIr
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
April 22, 2009
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7006 2760 0003 3528 9233
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Limestone Creek Farm
P.O. Box 702
Kenansville, NC 28349
Subject: Notice of Violation and
Recommendation for Enforcement
Case# NOV-2009-PC-0379
Limestone Creek Farm
Facility Number: 31-182
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Nethercutt:
This is to notify you of violations of Swine Waste Management System State General Permit
AWG100000 issued on October 1, 2004 under Certificate of Coverage AWS310182.
On March 19, 2009, Ms. Amanda Gaines from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality performed a routine compliance inspection of your animal operation and the animal waste
management system serving your operation.
From the inspection, the following violations to State General Permit AWGI00000 were
documented:
1. Inadequate Waste Analyses
Irrigation occurred on March 12, 2008. The dates on the waste analyses found with the records
were October 31, 2008, July 22, 2008, and all others were prior to October 3, 2007.
This is in violation of Condition III. 5 of the State General Permit that states in part, "An analysis
of the animal waste shall be conducted in accordance with recommended laboratory sampling
procedures as close to the time of application as practical and at least within sixty (60) days
(before or after) of the date of application."
Wilmington Regional Office One
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405 NoTthCa.rollna
Phone. [phone]/FAX: [phone] f, //
Internet: v wvv_ncwateraualitv.ora Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
50% Recycled/ 10% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercuit
Notice of Violation and Recommendation of Enforcement
31-182
April 22, 2009
Page 2 of 3
2. Failure to Record Weekly Freeboard Levels
There was no record found of freeboard levels being recorded since the week of October 12,
2008.
This is in violation of Condition M. 2.a of the State General Permit that states in part, "The
waste level in each lagoon with a waste level gauge shall be monitored and recorded weekly on
forms supplied by or approved by the Division."
3., Record Keeping Needs Improvement
Mr. John College of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation noted during his attempted
Operations Review on October 31, 2008 that sludge removal was in progress. During the March
19, 2009 Compliance inspection, no record was found of the sludge removal, such as, sludge
waste utilization plan, sludge waste analysis, or soil samples for fields of application.
This is in violation of Condition H. 12. of the State General Permit that states in part, "At the
time of sludge removal from a lagoon/storage pond, the sludge must be managed in accordance
with the CAWMP."
The following information must be received by the Wilmington Regional Office, Division of Water
Quality within 15 working days of the receipt of this notice.
Response requirements are listed as follows:
a. A written explanation of the violation.
b. A written description of the actions to be taken to prevent a recurrence.
c. All waste analyses from 2007, 2008, 2009 calendar years.
d. Freeboard levels from the lagoon for the 2008 and 2009 calendar years.
e. All records pertaining to the sludge removal in 2008 (including but not limited too: sludge
waste utilization plan, sludge waste analysis, soil samples for fields where sludge applied)
You may wish to contact your County Soil & Water Conservation District Office, County Extension
office, a qualified technical specialist, and/or a professional engineer for any assistance they may be able
to provide.

Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Notice of Violation and Recommendation of Enforcement
31-182
April 22, 2009
Page 3 of 3
Be advised that this office is considering recommending assessment of .civil penalties to the
Director of the Division of Water Quality for the above noted violations. These violations may
result in civil penalties of up to $25,000 per violation in accordance with North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.6A(a)(2). You may also be assessed for reasonable costs of the investigation in
accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.3(a)(9). Your response will be
forwarded to the Director along with the enforcement package for his consideration. Be advised
that the Division of Water Quality may take further action in this matter including injunctive
relief and permit revocation.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call Ms. Amanda Gaines from
the Wilmington Regional Office at 910-796-7327.
Yours very.truly,
4' 3-aL_
Charles F. Sfehman, Ph.D., P.G.
Environmental Program Supervisor III
Attachments
cc: Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown LLC
John College, DSWC-WiRO
APS Central Files
DWQ Wilmington Animal Files 31-182
S:\WQS\ANfMALS\DUPLfN\2009\31-182NOVREF

North Carolina
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Limestone Creek Farm
P.O. Box 702
Kenansville, NC 28349
Dear Mr. Nethercutt:
�I j
NCDENR
Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
March 24, 2009
Natural Resources
Subject: Letter of Concern
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Limestone Creek Farm
Facility Number: 31-182
Duplin County
This letter is a follow up to the compliance inspection conducted on March 19, 2009 by Amanda Gaines
of the Division of Water Quality. During the inspection it was noted that the record keeping and
monitoring efforts at the farm were inadequate.
• Waste analyses were not within the 60 days before and after pumping
• Freeboard levels are not being kept
• Monthly structural checks are not being noted
• Calibration of waste application equipment is overdue
• Soil analyses were not conducted
• Sludge removal was performed and no records were present
• Records and onsite representative were not available for Soil and Water Operation Review
Inspection in 2008
The following items were requested:
• Waste analysis records other than 7/22/08,10/31/08,10/3/07 or before. Forward within 30 days
of the March 191h inspection.
• Calibration of waste application equipment. Forward within 60 days of the March 191h
inspection.
Soil samples should be collected within 30 days of the March 19`h inspection. Forward results
within 60 days of the March 19`h inspection.
• All records related to the sludge removal. Forward within 30 days of the March 19th inspection.
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone]
Internet: w .ncsvaterdualitv.ora
NorthCarolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% Recycled/ 10% Post Consumer Paper
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748

LG1111 1l lvlll1.
31-182
March 24, 2009
If I have not received the first set of requested material by April 20, 2009, I will initiate a Notice of
Violation.
As noted in the inspection report, you were not present at the inspection. This was due to three
cancelled appointments. After the third cancellation, I indicated that you could leave the records for me
to inspect. Additionally, you failed to contact the Soil and Water inspector at any time concerning your
Operation Review at which you did. not attend or make records available.
We need to discuss the importance of communication. I would like to set up a time for you to come into
our office and meet vrith me as well as my supervisor, Charlie Stelunan, to discuss record 'keeping and
activities at your farm.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 910-796-7327.
Sincerely,
Amanda Gaines
Environmental Specialist
Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regional Office
cc: John.College, DSWC-WiRO
DWQ Wilmington Animal Files 31-182
5:\W QS\ANIMALS\DUPLIN\2009\31-182

Type of Visit 7,2f-Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit &outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: // CPJ Arrival Time: �� Departure Time: 3� County: �LfT Region:
Farm Name: `-1 FnC=�5' t CWE �LEEK FP L ifi Owner Email:
Owner Name: lUMtD-F/q(4 f=7nC-Q_<-(,L1 % Phone: 91C)-2960-/(025 Exrgcl's
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
swtne Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: O o = ' = « Longitude: = ° = ,
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity 'Population-
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes )4�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
ANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
*No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued
I

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: "<CcNA/
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): (� . -s
Observed Freeboard (in): 3 -4-
- I -
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA FINE
Structure 5 Structure 6
S.
Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ T,es
Lr i _,
(ie/large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6.
Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
34 No
❑ NA " El NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWQ
7.
Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8.
Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9.
Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑yes
maintenance improvement?
(No
❑ NA El NE
or
Waste Application
"
10.
Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ yes
X No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11.
Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13.
Soil type(s) /mot r4 ZJ l 4 MCC
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
1ANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
tANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
0,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
'M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
�� eY)17 _GT A Ga�� ovOP SS ' JN
- V2 r�lb i P(t ���:;r7- AT 116F)Gci tonl - A PTC2 ScPNCELLAVOWS
!-)e w6 %-rot_h I4C CC3`L' L-CaUP ZEC09-bT 6& Rt«n 2!!tc se FaL/.x5pE'_71au
ReviewerinspectorName (1/ 'S' (tLqIO (a I - Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

�t 4
Facility Number: 3 1 jgg Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. 0 WUP 0 Checklists 0 Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. MYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Waste Application 0 Weekly MWaste Analysis t4Soil Analysis ❑ jeaste Transfers ❑ /nnual Certification
❑ Rainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections 0 Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
. 0 Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
_V!�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
IX Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus'loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
U NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
C,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
tNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
[ANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
U NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
%No
❑ NA
❑ NE
w �JJo� tiLo
Or e4S, o-,HE?-16 t.�P_IZ I©I )6 aCL�3E1 4Z
�y0(}��1REC cuAc�OIJt� (n)1V se;" oh
1 of 15Tl4rE_ C�J,-++«(L11c- ERAI, 17 5 7.41
" g gy LA.JSiS. oU tNr_ AjV/fvtAL L13AS7E- 54)P �osv�vt7F-
A4 �Es4si wt�tal� srr��Ct�c�� �R�sC�c�o o�t���
THE D¢}7C-- C:'F' pwC-PGAiiV%d
} �r�r t1L}C,ct E? l�`A��r= I41llJS1S ` c FRS C- a2t�a{�i�
,cs snn + �cT�41ht �jbDAt��
-rpSv 15 v o u 4704/V ,nN it�-2 p JJO L.�jAS i i Dwsfr -C�
ie.)co;,l�1Prv. w w4S �SED� /ri AMtASY -O
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Facility Number: 3) — tga Date of Inspection �
a�. NU FGLCVr(3� 1P-►g�goc�goScu}`�L
WAS c LLAAIEI) GtJ? �uT R/Ui NOTE% .
�Lr ASS rroTr_ i HC_ DA; E SLCAiJC�E (_ JAC> PC- L AS c.or��
l}ocL ASZC iNl7rALL� I " R-14 I/V F ALL- H0(A21 ►P I }hQES NO
QJR1N ,V,4 At )vrt/ ltOlL�71LLN Eh io /�e1ilRi Tt;fli
l.1Qt� G01UI.i.Gi f b y OL&V- MONTIiCJJ <72t�CT�tfZ�t cflE-'L�
J
I H IS ENooaI4 ucpAlN //V C,00 i 7o Qf--ccNm F-fir: -PP.�
(� LAGocw F-zUF_L /n� cc
C,11LIR�ZATI W LA..) A ado bua /- i NCQ-C LA (-4& A/Ccs
��Ce�tZ}j TtFLi., IT (-vA-S bOn1
7' CAC 1s3a- ATe W1.19I.i Co0 c®�' 7C, D')E
7S• SLv SLL�tcs t Sd�ouLh ccy,vDc4c:fGI, Ti-I lo
S6MIT AN C-'-x s &N57IOA( GZG-ruFS A -Tr 1190-T
1 OA ! `►: I /-% � cc> u'-L n t1GL� w a i Hl ,
L.1 ECG GO/,17-Ac7 Ai F a-. L
'a; L� IAI FF c:Iery rt1 r5 L
i f f!✓4Z $� s� Xlb oOOB �1 L. F4NAL-�S}'S
S07)p�n 0
ENS��cilc�rd °� o�wA FZ Stl.�"� i 5 M t,%.jtTHe1'l b(:Jbt��
R,C A Wv1 i cASfE �xlA� ��t�� �Oi�F�N%Lf�S1S�
rn �Q a wt kE'� S Lv Dom, A PLA
�LEb�S %-CAS JAR R To m &- Wi T 141,;v
(DC-'! 141 S i AISVEE i )cw V

Facility Number:-j� — tg'o� )late of inspection ,. Fj C9
� t`l . A in pnoi; (QP I"vG S
it-t�1tlJ�iyv� � (�98VO.S
oP iJ 9ID �5-)-cp&q
,Nlb as tL l� -T1447 �O� P 1
SOt L-q f- �P�� C)Fe Frg ; e c c i Gr Div ® FALL
DOC)& �UvK w� R C NC} r �Z� E �4ZF_% ► e� l��Q
i tivk7_��U i �Alc t�6�C i N�lt� Tit Gt��J�
(�C RItLI t.��� �Suc-i r i�t A- Gt-` �CR-�A
L (!DIvy jott w WA zv— 7v
i1f� �JQSSt�i R IYC r� �� Vic ��c���
iu-- c-o�nu Y-C Me-vos I PRO uC-fnC-N7 As wc-L�
Yc Cpii>1G CAp EMI E H. �t1%3�tf% d C�� d 1�� � v1 rn N % S .
tcc- EJISt t'�S
CJOLt� pm ll
i i tli lC C a V ►C5 t-P i ty�f
WAue A/vC io1'aic"S
Jo-
!tl
1 7/25/97

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Coleen H. Sullins
Dee Freeman
Governor
Director
Secretary
March 24, 2009
Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Limestone Creek Farm
P.O. Box 702
Kenansville, NC 28349
Subject:
Letter of Concern
Limestone Creek Farm
Facility Number: 31-182
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Nethercutt:
This letter is a follow up to the compliance inspection conducted on March 19, 2009 by Amanda Gaines
of the Division of Water Quality. During the inspection it was noted that the record keeping and
monitoring efforts at the farm were inadequate.
• Waste analyses were not within the 60 days before and after pumping
• Freeboard levels are not being kept
• Monthly structural checks are not being noted
• Calibration of waste application equipment is overdue
• Soil analyses were not conducted
• Sludge removal was performed and no records were present
• Records and onsite representative were not available for Soil and Water Operation Review
Inspection in 2008
The following items were requested:
• Waste analysis records other than 7/22/08,10/31/08,10/3/07 or before. Forward within 30 days
of the March 19`h inspection.
• Calibration of waste application equipment. Forward within 60 days of the March 19`h
inspection.
• Soil samples should be collected within 30 days of the March 19`h inspection. Forward results
within 60 days of the March 19`h inspection.
• All records related to the sludge removal. Forward within 30 days of the March 19`h inspection.
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone]
Internet: www ncwateraualitv.ora
NorthCarolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748

Letter of Concern
31-182
March 24, 2009 .
If I have not received the first set of requested material by April 20, 2009, I will initiate a Notice of
Violation.
As noted in the inspection report, you were not present at the inspection. This was due to three
cancelled appointments. After the third cancellation, I indicated that you could leave the records for me
to inspect. Additionally, you failed to contact the Soil and Water inspector at any time concerning your
Operation Review at which you did. not attend or make records available.
We need to discuss the importance of communication. I would like to set up a time for you to come into
our office and meet with me as well as my supervisor, Charlie Stehman, to discuss record keeping and
activities at your farm.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 910-796-7327.
Sincerely,
a`�-
A. —
Amanda Gaines
Environmental Specialist
Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regional Office
cc: John College, DSWC-WiRO
DWQ Wilmington Animal Files 31-182
S:\WQS\ANIMALS\DUPLTN\2009\31-182

Type of Visit YYCo--mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ,C7.Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: L3)
Farm Name: `L
Owner Name:1
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _
Back-up Operator: _
Location of Farm:
Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Region:
Owner Email:
Phone: 9 )(2)' Roos EXT 49s
Title: Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = = = Longitude: [�o [�,
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑ Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
qi 1
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dai Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
El Farrow
Layers
ElNon-Layers
El Beef Stocker
Gilts
❑Beef Feeder
El Brood Co
EBoars
El Pullets
El Turkeys
El
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
11 ❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
0
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
ANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�LNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

19
Facility Rum ber: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: 1,44Opn/
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): . S
Observed Freeboard (in): 3�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑NA ❑NE
El NA ❑NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes DO No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Pq No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 0,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s) M �(_ Q (_U A / V `CC
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
MNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
JANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
JyQNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
'MNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
1(3. COutA NOT FIND Cc�>Y_) F PCM17 — z (r6FT R GoP% (=N VSSIG W
HOSE- w/�y'`�oF/NSPEc7iOn! ((�Po(Z7
FpW M z22 Nt3T P(Z�SE�l - AT //VS�c7-104 - A GTE2 3CAvcsc�aT,cV
uo r lAC TALC WP cr)L&LIN t-EAuF QCcoQi�iS !IV 0rAAtO00KSE FUR/XSOFcwt
Reviewer/Inspector Name / S tL 9f0-(oj; W Phone: 910- i%(9-15i1 f Name S LC. �{(O-(oj3 W Phone: 910- Y%(9-15i1 f I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: �q Jo9
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

�19
Facility Number: 3 1 —/9 Date of Inspection CBS
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes .0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. 0 WUP 0 Checklists Q Design ❑ Maps
p [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. t MYes ❑ No ❑ NA ElNE
❑ ok
Waste Application ❑ Week1V Freeboard Waste Analysis U Soil Analysis El)+caste Transfers ❑ /nnual Certification
❑ Rainfall 0 Stocking ❑ Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
'D�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
JXYes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
U NA
❑ NE
Otherlssues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
DiNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
tNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
IA No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
'ONA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
VkNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings: r+`
w R• �la9lo8 NCo io/3fo s
ib/�`31og , 38
a�, i+� wASTF A-uaL�ISIS FawM� wER-� Fog �(��c�8 wIU�'31���
cv-TW& 07Ha ASS RE I0)3)6-4o9-QEFo2-r
%?LXMPINL� wAs D(2i?vE oN E eemubp r3-/a-off
. 5 • oF-rt►E STA-Je- CJ-We9.AL. PE2MIT 57A7ES
•• ►4n1 OfALL�S)S c>F -tHr_ AN1MAt- wAc37C 5+jALt_5G co RAG Ri
A•r I.cAS� ))TN/N s►xr'C(�o� pnysC�3-
THF DA7G of PPPucA3j rI
t�H£f� t,e�ASTE KFI�IA S)S ��6ASE Fo2wp(Z%
-raJ3oWyS �1~ T+41S 1A/T _C-7lGA/
,�.� wt-rNlnI
TµCQ E 15 A es. Fs B PR/J ON IR R -a Fo R,0tA_ Q�U'T rlo wAS-rr &YALL�S1S
e�GovF12M - wLFS uSEb� I 1 RLtSlAS7-08 �
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Facfliky Number: 3) — )�a Date of Inspection Ef9 O
Q�, /Vp Fizeezoozb AFTr_R Or--fc-)a&R 19-18,`dOM�Fi-SLLtma
U--AS CLCRNED OLC1 �cLtT N[-�T NUT61�._
�Ic.EAS6NOTis� THG DF?•TE SLuzJ6E Zsmot,{L- wASCOM?LVTEa
A9£ IN17l19LLL� 1,1gA114FALL HoWEW:E1L� IF IT DOES N07
QA,1/J OUE2 AN I" I)V I¢ pt.OAM 1.10u S71LL NEED TO /N/TI14L THAT
lr1 CoAlb mr--b LAOUVL MONIVi. CHc--CI,
- 1 4me—IS EmOL)4H tA�;tAID /N �+4�oonl To R�caeA F2rf<6oA�4�
nn,, 11 LAGoam LCU6L
OC"1. CALl?-aATIW wAS bur_ IIV AOO'�'$ - TllGe& WIGS N�
(Z F�GoR n T#�lT /T w!•1- S bON F
t CAe-IsaaTe wl'tb/M &O DAys /4 COPA-ro mE
aS• ►-I SCuDSE S(�RUEC-ASH � g� �N�^�'E� T141S(bt=A(�L�O`�,
.� (,t(X,L CAu�D' SLiJg(1R1T AN P,XTENVOW iLf=t��uEST �T iflR?
TIME I N 6i Co(�t i� 4iEt P �,` W t T ff T Ni17 p Ock
(.I Y-F Go/IITAcT MF LA.)ILc F15L
a(�. �0F IDa CA" Noy W/Qj::co(ZDS NKS w aIC �Jc7tu
+v4L)fi R CO?L�W171`, C 2A3 rro� (3*LL_�) IN51?ECT1ov Tlp1
o�l • T}fF1iZE A-q-E X/6 oC)OU C-C>1 L- 1Wu-� Vs
(J(,E-P-SE cOLLECI S01L- SRmQLGS WITH W FTOG
1 N SPEci I c�1V �i �o�wA� " QS�-� -rO MG- W ITN IN Co OD9�S
SLv.Q6E w AS R M ovEi� �m Lp�,poNS ! lau
Qc�DS
WUP wASi-E A-NALT I S) Sole- am4LLPsi
rn�p o� wr>•ER-E sLI�OL�F AQPI-►�
?LCASE cc:-PLs
To (Y) E W►THIN 3ODpl�S
7/25197

-Fuctliq Number:Date of Inspection
Pu CZ Ec�uEs i pt� Mrws 5 +IouLT�5 t3�_:, SEn,—/ To :
�-rN : A m A N b q GP�Imc S
0 Acbb-N�--'tck *)Q - APS
(lJ►c-mws�dv� NC o7&`IOS
pum : AmAxoa 604AEs
IT S {hoc i( * dE Nor EIL TNg7 cJoc�. FA I LC-� -roBE S�,vi
(Z Solr_+U�A7C? pPERp-r/ON I4UIE� /Nrftc FALQ
`—o(L �J
aF ��s • �ov. we-R E Nbi `t EF E�QF� -To ��Q RT T�►A T
T► M� QvT �RILt�R E -�o N�4u C THE 4Z:DS AuA►LflQc
L'KNuL Iu REFERR�� FRonA- S0IL4 wA7ER7c>
4, T+few A Oq- UIOLA71c�X
Kevlbs 1m�RotkcmEAI qS wEI_L
lr1C)IVI-To �LING9-�LkIREMEN7S.
Z wl�� �Z�u►� AT TOE aq-:F-ICE-%k IScuSS
FAQ °rTNC-- L-4C-K of GgTA1N REcoRbS WITH mt
S��`ZU wI LL JIIUuJot- I % 1 p>-14x/ T�
w►Tt1 A 14C51 IC,C C"F
�� �� ygUE A����ES7lONS oR NCEUTo1�IScc.tsS
(�Nc,J-rNINEi/ pL!!c SE C_cyNTAcT ffi2—.
7/25/97

P.1
Supply Warehouse
MB Fax Cover
MuloyamnuC Sheet
789 Hwy 24150 East
Warsaw NC 28398
Date: p
70: G/R2[..�5 5�7F.lfr'yl AfJ
n.nl./:✓ p- [�wAa Nall
From: A"16Q,=
Re:
Phone: [phone]
Fax: (910) 29"428
Number of pages (including cover sheet) —to
��E1-VEI�
MAY 1 4 2009
BY;��

Farm: _
Daily RabrfalllWeekly Lagoon Level Record
2008
January - -' Freebomd
s l
Q.
February Freeboard
s,vomi
CM1.li
SUN
LON
WE
WED
THUR
FRI
I SA
S
WE
WED
TPH.IR
FRI
I SAT
c
-I
u
s
•
e
H
to
u
n
If
t
w
T
b
t 4\
l Rrr.
2,
II
x5
a
,>
.�,
ij
K
]+
D
f
JG
i�
March Freeboard
sm,euv
Caoct
April Freeboard
swxza
UN
N
WE
WED
TFUR
FRI
I SAT
SUN
WN
111E
\rED
THUR
FRI
SAT
,
z
t
l(T1
Z4
J
z
.
4«
`=
rs,
ZL
i
Z1
it
IT
.1
,a
n
m
m
m
m
a
-s
J'�
ra
•
�`
�
Z i
zs
m
z
m
a
r9
>l
Srlmm
�0a
Su
May Freeboard
June Freeboard
U
TU
Y
TNUR
FD
SA
NDN
Tu
WED
FRI
SAT
l
{
F_'
N
a
:w
IT
6
10
IT
IS
H
+1
29m
m
Record rainfall daily.
It daily
rminfaa
totals 1 inch orareater,
initial In
box that
lagoon It.
r1ly has
been
checked_
K preeipNation tatmmotyanite a5 S on date. 4aje i of 2 _ - _ RmisrA IN S3706

p.3
l�iurphy-Brrlwn - _
Fame �, Daily RairftlMieeisk�agnon Level Record
July Freeboard _
se evnl
August Freeboard
Sw.
SUN
WN
WED
R
FM
SAT'�
.SIN
Y'
TNUR
FW
z"
Z"
qo
H
'Z
43
1]
x
IS
li
3
IS
19
s
Il
L
li
x
S
1!
-`
►1.
4�
i
�s
40
St
5
fi
E �
T
,1
E•4
r{,p
4
.OS
�m
29
]lM
S
3'3
I
September Freeboard
October Freebcard
costa
SUN
MCA I
TU
WED
Se
770-WED
la1R
A
17
,
le
t5 �K
1)
19
19
6
]
11
11.
,!
1.
19
7
3
7:7
—7 92
_
I
November Freeboard
aNc9:ro
�'�
December Freeboard
e�wr>,I
clr�
SUN
MN I TUE
WED
TMUR
SI
—
TtNR
SA
I
,
9
s
..—
r
9
fn
u
- 1u
1.
I,
12
1,
,.
,<
fG
M
,L
9N
19
N
II
a
:5
21
Record rainfall daily. N daily rainfall totals f inch or greater, Initlal.1ri bon that lagoon integrity has been chocked.
if precipitation Is srlow, note as S on date.
Rernnbn ?ens: 3ye= Page 21a2 Redsed 4: 8131M

PM : 'A Fl,�? y,
Daily RainfalINVeekly Lagoon Level Record
p.4
2009
January
Fre
r.,3.va
�0d'
February
Freeboard
sf{ou•I
SUN
MON
NE
O
T
Fit
FRI
597
N
M
-x
NE
WED
TNUR
FRI
SAL
cudI
P
J
3
r
e
:fr
u
u
la
n
1,
.
tl
f2
Il
N
IS
R
Ix
If
I6 -
1]
IS
IB
n
1{
if
b
x:
r
m
a
n
n
t
March
Freebcard
s.m„
April
Freeboard
slmx°a
SUN
MON
N'_
W_O
TfiUR
FRI
SAT
SUN
MJN
TU
t
WEJ
1
iHJA
FRI
a
SAT
V
W
e
f
a
1
rx
n
u
!
]
r
,
la
u
�"v
13
16
Ix
If
If
xl
IE
I]
11�
IS
I{
Il
M
1,5
xa
3
a3
x!
]3
n
'J
,v
a
m
n--7
a
a
m
Ma
Freeboard
sw.mml
Q°d'
June
Freeboard
sl.lau,l
N
M O'
M
E
TNu
I
AT
SUN
'!EO
I
1
x
1 ON
HUR
f
AT
Clla.
F�
L,J�O
f
•
m
Ix
u
la
n
Ix
N
1.
t<
14
1S
•
]
tf
]
IS
If
z3
a
>r
]
a
a
a
Record relnfall daffy.
If dairy
reirtfall
totals ! Ineh m greater,
Initlsl In
LOW la000n
Inteudty
has
hf,l..
�I...•bl
If Prec'Paauon Is snow, note as S on date.
Relene Paicd: 3ymm
Pape 1 of 2
Rovldlan S: 1214ma

NOWS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Web site: www.ncw.gov/wvnomi/
Report: W09059
.�'11'• "`.d,
`K
Waste Analysis Report
Cromer.
Nethercull, lvey/flmothy/Laura Copies to:
c/dImmiune Creek Farm
PO Box 702
Kenn n le, NC 28349
Parm.•
05/15/2007
Duplin County
Sample Informadon
Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
Smnple m
_ N
P R Ca
Mg S
Pa Ain A
Ca B 410 a C
01
Tofal 391
50.6 406 142
31.5 18.5
4.49 0.30 06
0.64 1.87
AWN
Waste Code:
-Awl
AIS
-M73
No m Cd
Pb Al
Se Li PH
SS GN DM% COX ALE I
s06
7.96
Denrrl Ifew
ne-N
Stone LrMODLI .
Urea
Nutrients Avdlable for Firal Crop
I&II000 allons
Otber elements lbs 1000 V1110185
App80allon AleAbod
N PM A'd) Ca Afg S /if
All, Zn ON
8 Alo a
Na 14 Cd P6 N So Li
IrripBon
1.6 0.68 3.3 0.83 0.18 0.11 0.03
T 0.03 T
0.01
0.6T

NOARCs Agronomic Division Phone: (q*)733-3655 Web site: wwwncw.gov/agronomi/
Report: W00053
��%TA
(44,oe Report
D,-
Grower:
Nethercutt, Ivey/rimothy/D.uura Copiex to:
c/oLknestone Creek Farm
PO box 702
Ilenensvlllo,Nt:2s34Y
Waste nalysis
Farn:
07/02/2007
Duplin County
sample Information
Laboratory Results (parts per million miles othera9se noted)
SampieM.
N
P A' Ca
A19
S
Fe Ain Zn
Cu R AID G C
001
Twial 445
49,7 498 99.1
49.1
19.2
3.08 0.37 2.90
0.89 1.50
by-N
Waste Cede:
-N111
ALS
-NOJ
Na M Cd
M
Al
Se 2! P11
SS CN Mi% CM ALE(
109
7.73
Dwrrip0on:
OR-N
Stone - an Li Q.
uma
Nutrients; AreOable for First Crop
PS11090 gallows
Other Elements lbs 1600 allons
Applicaaan Atdbnd
N P205 w Ca Afg S Fe
AIn
Zsr Ca
B No Cf
Na M Cd M Al So 2!
Ir11(ptlan
1.9 0.66 4.0 0.58 0.17 0.11 0.02
T
0.02 0.01
U.01
0.91
N1

NCDAUS 0nomh: Division Phone: [phone] Web site: vAm.neW.gov/ogonomi/
Report W07105
Crolm,
Netherrutt, Ivey/Timothy/Laura Copies to:
S/oUmmInne Gmek Farm
PO Box 702
CN
L[ e ort
Waste Anal
RenansNlle,NC 2R349
sis
y p
Aarni:31-182
04/15/2009
Duplin County
sample Informa0on
Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
Semple m,
N
P X Cu No
S
/b Mn 1n _
Cu D Mo (Y C
000001
701al 279
74.0 603 119 $5.3
289
5.49 0.58 10.2
0.88 1.24
OJ-N
Waste cde:
-AW4
Na A9 Cd Pb
Al
Se U PE
,BS CN DM% (IM, ALE(Kgi
ALB
403
146
7.23
Darerrptlam-
OR-N
Bn7ne Lam L10.
Ursa
Nutrients Avatiable for First Crop
lbs/ 000 allons
Other Elements lbs/1000 allons
Applimoan Melbad
N P705 aw &1 Mg S Fe Alto
m 0,
D Ala 12
Na Ni Cd Pb Al Sa A
nrlpUm
1.2 0.99 5.3 0.69 0.32 0.17 0.03 T
0.07 0.01
0.01
1.2
v
v

FORM SLUR-2 Slurry and Sludge Application Field Records
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract # Creech Field # 1
Field Size(Wetted Acres)=(A) 29.55 Facility Number 31-182
Farm Owner Creech Spreader Operator
Owner's Address and Address Ken Taylor
Owner's Phone # Operator's Phone #
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Crop Type Wheat Recommended PAN 108
Loading (lb/acre) = (B)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
"'Nutrient
Source
Date
(mm/dd/yr)
Number
of Loads
per Field
Volume of
each Load'
(gallons)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(2) x (3)
Volume per Acre
(gallons/acre)
(4) / (A)
Waste Analysis
PAN"
(lb/1000 gal)
PAN Applied
(lb/acre)
(6) x (5) / 1000
Nitrogen Balance—
(lb/acre)
(B) - (7)
B= 108
Limeston
10/27/2008
20
6000
120000
4060.91
13.8
56.04
51.96
Limeston
10/28/2008
20
6000
120000
4060.913706
Crop Cycle Totals:
Owners Signature
Certified Operator (print)
Spreader Operator's Signature
Operator Certification No.
Can be found in operator's manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manual.
See your waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events.
"'Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application event.
"`Enter nutrient source (ie. Lagoon/Storage Pond ID, commerical fertilizer, dry litter, etc.) 3/14/2003

A -j�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
MEMORANDUM
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
Natural Resources
TO: Keith Larick, Environmental Program Supervisor III
Animal Feeding Operations Permitting and Compliance Unit
FROM: Amanda Gaines, Environmental Specialist ALc,
Wilmington Regional Office
THROUGH: Charles F. Stehman, Environmental Program Supervisor III
Wilmington Regional Office
SUBJECT: Enforcement Report
Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Limestone Creek Farm
Facility Number: 31-182
Duplin County
DATE: May 22, 2009
Box
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Please find attached the subject enforcement report, which concludes that Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
violated Condition No. III. 5. of the State General Permit AWG100000 by failing to conduct waste
analyses of the animal waste within sixty days of the date of application. Secondly, Mr. Nethercutt
violated Condition No. III. 2.a of the State General Permit AWG100000 by failing to record lagoon
waste level weekly on forms supplied by or approved by the Division. Lastly, Mr. Nethercutt violated
Condition 11. 12. of the State General Permit AWG100000 by failing to produce records showing that
the sludge was removed from the lagoon and manged in accordance with the CAWMP.
A Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement (Case # NOV-2009-PC-0379) was issued
on April 22, 2009 for inadequate waste analyses, failure to record weekly freeboard levels, and record
keeping needs improvement.
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone]
Internet: w .ncwateraualitv.ora
NorthCarolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% Recycled/ 10% Post Consumer Paper
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748

Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Memo
31-182
May 22, 2009
It is recommended that appropriate civil penalties be .assessed in accordance with G.S.
143-215.6A(a)(2). It is also recommended that all of the enforcement costs incurred in the investigation
be recovered in the amount of $81.33 pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 14313-282. 1 (b)(8).
If you have any questions, please contact me at 910-796-7327.
Attachments
cc: Wilmington Regional Office (Entire Enforcement Package)
S:\WQS\ANIMALS\Duplin\2009\31-182\31-182 Memo

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ANIMAL OPERATIONS
ENFORCEMENT CASE REPORT
Violator:
Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Contact Person:
Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Address:
P.O. Box 702, Kenansville, NC 28349
Facility #:
31-182
Receiving Stream:
N/A
Classification:
N/A
Regional Office:
Wilmington
Inspector:
Amanda Gaines
Report Prepared By:
Amanda Gaines
Case Narrative:
On March 19, 2009, Ms. Amanda Gaines from the Wilmington Regional Office conducted a
routine compliance inspection at the Limestone Creek Farm facility. While reviewing the
records for the facility several violations of the permit were noted. Irrigation had occurred at the
facility without a waste analysis being collected within the sixty day time frame allotted by the
permit and lagoon waste levels had not been recorded since the week of October 12, 2008.
Additionally, the Division of Soil and Water Conservation noted, in October M08 during the
attempted operation review, that the sludge was being cleaned out of the lagoons. The grower did
not meet the Soil and Water inspector for the operation review and no records were provided.
During the March 2009 compliance inspection, no paperwork was found with the farm records in
regards to the sludge clean out event.
An inspection report was left at the farm on March 19, 2009, detailing the violations and the
materials requested. The inspection report also included the deadlines for getting the requested
materials to the Wilmington Regional Office. A Letter of Concern was issued on March 24,
2009 as a follow up to the March 19, 2009 inspection. The Letter of Concern again detailed the
violations, the materials requested, and the deadlines. In addition, the Letter of Concern
expressed the intent to initiate a Notice of Violation (NOV) if the materials were not received.
The letter invited Mr. Nethercutt to come to the Wilmington Regional Office to meet with the
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) and.discuss how to remedy the violations and prevent any
future violations. Mr. Nethercutt never attempted contact with DWQ.
On May 7, 2009, Toni King, a Technical Specialist with Murphy Brown, emailed DWQ an
unsigned and undated nutrient management plan for the sludge removal. Upon speaking to Ms.
King, it was discovered that the plan had not been prepared prior to the October 2008 sludge
clean out event. According to Mr. Nethercutt, the company that performed the sludge clean out
has not sent him any paperwork about the clean out event. On May 14, 2009, Mr. Nethercutt
faxed completed lagoon level records, some waste analyses, and his written response. The

lagoon level records were filled in after the March 2009 inspection by using data called into the
integrator. The waste analyses that were sent do not cover the irrigation event cited in the NOV.
The written response cites job pressures as the reason for the violations as well as having
difficulty getting the company that performed the sludge clean out to produce records. On May
18, 2009, Ms. King emailed Slur-2 forms. After speaking with Ms. King, it appears that there is
still no documentation to support the information on the forms. At this time, the following
documents that were requested have not been received by DWQ: the waste analyses for the
sludge, the soil analyses, the map of the fields, the signed nutrient management plan, a land
owner's agreement, and documentation of how much sludge was removed and applied by the
company that removed the sludge.
A file review for the facility indicates that during the June 14, 2007, April 28, 2006, and July, 15,
2005 inspections Mr. Nethercutt was informed about the permit condition for waste analyses
being conducted within sixty days of a pumping event.
Farm and/or Company Compliance History: Include a cony of CAFO Designation letters
previous NOV's, NOD's previous civil assessments, etc.
December 10, 2003 Notice of Deficiency issued for inadequate freeboard.
Amount of Waste Discharge (if applicable). if amount cannot be estimated what is the
rate of flow reaching surface water.
N/A
Sample Results (If applicable) with locations of samples taken noted in relation to the
discharge point:
N/A
Violator's degree of cooperation (including efforts to prevent or restore) recalcitrance:
The violator has not been very cooperative. The violator started being uncooperative when he
failed to meet Mr. John College from the Division of Soil and Water Conservation for his fall
2008 operation review. Also, at this time he has made no effort to contact Mr. College.
Additionally, the violator cancelled the scheduled compliance inspection three times. Once was
due to illness and there was twenty-four hour notice. The remaining two were cancelled the day
they were scheduled to be conducted and the reason the violator gave was that he had something
he had to get done that day. After his last cancellation, he was notified by DWQ that the records
needed to be made available the following day. After the inspection, the violator did not make
contact with DWQ. He was sent a Letter of Concern to outline the violations from the inspection
report. He did not make contact with DWQ or send the requested material. A NOV was issued
outlining the violations and requesting certain materials. He responded to the NOV one day
before the deadline; however, he did not submit all the material requested. The inspection report
and Letter of Concern also asked for a second set of material due to DWQ by May 20, 2009. At

this time, that material has not been received by DWQ and a second NOV has been issued.
Fish kill observed? Y/N If yes, include report from WRC:
N/A
Mitigating Circumstances:
No mitigating circumstances.
Recommendation:
The Wilmington Regional Office is recommending assessment of civil penalties to the Director
of the Division of Water Quality pursuant to G.S.-143-215.6A.
Assessment Factors required to be considered by G.S. 143B-282.1(b):
1. The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from violation:
Not documented.
2. The duration and gravity of the violation:
The freeboard records were not properly recorded since the week of October 12, 2008.
The waste analyses were not collected at sufficient intervals to cover the March 12, 2008
pumping event. Additionally, it has been noted on inspection reports since 2005 that the
waste analyses have not been collected at proper intervals. The sludge was removed in
October 2008 without a waste utilization plan and the documentation for the sludge clean
out event that has been sent to DWQ is incomplete and insufficient to determine that it
was properly applied.
3. The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality:
Not measured.
4. The cost of rectifying the damage:
Unknown.
5. The amount of money saved by noncompliance:
The amount of money saved by noncompliance may be that amount of money that it
would cost to have the lagoon waste analyzed. That would have cost five dollars a
sample and four samples a year is recommended.
6. Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally:
Unknown.

7. The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs .
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority:
Notice of Deficiency was issued on December 10, 2003 for inadequate freeboard.
8. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures:
The State's enforcement costs totaled $0.00, as follows:
Staff 3 hours @ $27.11/hour $ 81.33
Total $ 81.33

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF DUPLIN
File No. NOV-2009-PC-0379
IN THE MATTER OF )
IVEY TIMOTHY NETHERCUTT )
FOR VIOLATIONS OF SWINE WASTE ) FINDINGS AND DECISION
GENERAL PERMIT AWG100000 ) AND ASSESSMENT OF
PURSUANT TO NORTH CAROLINA ) CIVIL PENALTIES
GENERAL STATUE 143-215.1 )
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I,
Theodore L. Bush, Jr., Chief of the Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water (DWQ),
make the following:
L FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt owns and operates the Limestone Creek Farm, a
swine animal operation located north of Beulaville, North Carolina on the east
side of Highway I I I in Duplin County.
B. Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt was issued Certificate of Coverage AWS310182
under Swine Waste Management System General Permit AWG100000 for the
Limestone Creek Farm on October 1, 2004, effective October 1, 2004, with an
expiration date of September, 30 2009 for the operation of a swine waste
collection, treatment, storage and application system.
C. Condition No. III. 5. of the General Permit AWG100000 states in part that "An
analysis of the animal waste shall be conducted in accordance with recommended
laboratory sampling procedures as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within sixty (60) days (before and after) of the date of application."
D. Mr. Nethercutt has been notified on three previous inspections (July 2005, April
2006, and June 2007) that his waste analyses were not meeting the permit
requirements.
E. DWQ staff from the Wilmington Regional Office inspected Limestone Creek
Farm on March 19, 2009 and found that irrigation had occurred on the farm and
the waste analyses in the records were inadequate.

F. Condition No. M. 2.a of the General Permit AWG100000 states in part that, "The
waste level in each lagoon with a waste level gauge shall be monitored and
recorded weekly on forms supplied by or approved by the Division"
G. On March 19, 2009, the waste level had not been recorded since the week of
October 12, 2008.
H. Condition H. 12. Of the General Permit AWGI00000 states in part that, "At the
time of sludge removal from a lagoon/storage pond, the sludge must be managed
in accordance with the CAWMP."
I. On October 31, 2008, the Division of Soil and Water Conservation noted that a
sludge removal was in progress. On March 19, 2009, there was no record of the
sludge removal.
I. The costs to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $0.00.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-
215.6A pursuant to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by G.S. 143-215.1.
C. A permit for this animal waste management system is required in accordance with
15A NCAC 2T .1304 and G.S. 143-215.1.
D. The above -cited failure to conduct waste analyses within sixty days of the date of
application violated Condition No. 111. 5. of the General Permit.
E. The above -cited failure to record weekly freeboard levels violated Condition No.
III. 2.a of the General Permit.
F. The above -cited failure to produce records to show sludge removal was managed
in accordance with the CAWMP violated Condition II. 12. of the General Permit.
G. Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt may be assessed civil penalties pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2) which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who
violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of
a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1.
H. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Mr. Ivey
Timothy Nethercutt pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 14313-282.1(b)(8).

I. The Chief of the Aquifer Protection Section, Division of Water Quality, pursuant
to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, has the
authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
M. DECISION:
Accordingly, Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
L,
S
for violating Condition No. M. 5. of the General Permit by
failing to conduct waste analyses within sixty days of the
date of application
for violating Condition No. M. 2.a of the General Permit by
failing to record freeboard levels weekly on forms supplied
by or approved by the Division
for violating Condition No. H. 12. of the General Permit by
failing to produce records to show sludge removal was
managed according to the CAWMP
S 81.33 Enforcement costs
S TOTAL AMOUNT DUE

As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I considered
the factors listed in G.S. 143B-282. I (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date) Theodore L. Bush, Jr., Chief
Aquifer Protection Section
Division of Water Quality

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF Duplin
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT )
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST )
Ivey Timothy Nethercutt )
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. NOV-2009-PC-0379
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $ for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality dated , the
undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an
administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the
assessment document.
The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of
this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Quality within thirty (30)
days of receipt of the civil penalty assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission request
will be allowed after thirty (30) days from the receipt of the civil penalty assessment.
This the day of 20
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: NOV-2009-PC-0379 County: Duplin
Assessed Party: Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Permit No. (if applicable): AWS310182 Amount Assessed: I
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission. Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of
Facts" form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that
you believe support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating
your request for remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to
consideration of the five factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the
amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for
contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c),
remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors
applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your case and provide a detailed
explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the factor applies (attach
additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G S 143B-282 1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in
the civil penalty assessment document);
_ (b) the violator Promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) Payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing
the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION:

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
December 10, 2003
Mr. Timothy Nethercutt
P.O. Box 702
Kenansville, NC 28349
Subject: Rescission of Notice of Violation /
Issuance of Notice of Deficiency
Limestone Creek Farm
Facility # 31-182
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Nethercutt:
Alan W. Klimek,-P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Thank you for your recent submittal of the information requested in our letter dated April 15,
2001. We greatly appreciate the effort that you made in compiling this information and sending
it to our Wilmington Regional Office by the date required. We also appreciate the fact that you
reported the problem with high freeboard to our staff as required by your permit and worked with
our staff to manage the problem once it occurred.
Upon review and consideration of the information submitted, the Wilmington Regional Office has
determined that no further compliance/enforcement actions will be takep by the Division for
these high freeboards.
Also, based on your actions to properly operate your facility, the Division of Water Quality
hereby rescinds the Notice of Violation that was issued to you on April 15, 2001 and replaces it
with this Notice of Deficiency.
In the future, please continue to evaluate ways to maintain freeboard levels in the required range.
These methods include, but are not limited to, water conservation practices, adding additional
application sites, updating your cropping systems, adding additional and/or more flexible
application equipment, and maintaining the lagoon levels at the lowest allowable and appropriate
levels throughout the year. Our staff looks forward to continuing to work with you and your
Technical Specialist to evaluate and implement any needed changes to your system.
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone]
1 800 623-7748 - 1617 Mail Service Center Fax: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
http://h2o.enr.state. nc. us
49�d
NCDENR
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St. -
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

Inadequate Freeboard
Timothy Nethercutt
December 10. 2003
Page 2
Thank you again for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please do'not hesitate to
contact the staff of our Wilmington Regional Office at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
CC: Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown, LLC
Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Patrick Fussell, DSWC
Wilmington Files 31-182
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Central Files

FRp Michael F. Easley
^-` G Governor
y r William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
■� -i Department of Environment and Natural Resources
T
■I Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
' Division of Water Quality
April 16, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ivey T. Nethercutt
PO Box 702
Kenansville NC 28349
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Request for Information
Inadequate Freeboard
Limestone Creek Farm
#31-182
Duplin County
Dear Sir or Madam:
On March 6, 2003, a representative of your animal operation informed the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) that there was inadequate freeboard in the lagoon(s) serving this facility.
This lack of adequate freeboard is in non-compliance with the Certificate of Coverage
issued to this facility on December 18, 2000. In addition to this Notice of Violation (NOV), this
non-compliance is subject to an appropriate enforcement action by DWQ. This action can
consist of one or more of the following: a civil or criminal enforcement action; an injunction;
and/or a requirement to apply for coverage under an individual permit. The action chosen will
be based on complete evaluation of all factors that resulted in the inadequate freeboard; the
actions taken to restore the needed freeboard; and the actions being proposed to prevent the
problem from reoccurring.
To assist us in our review, please provide the Wilmington Regional Office with an
evaluation of the reasons for the freeboard violation(s) and a strategy to prevent future freeboard
violation(s). This evaluation and strategy must include but is not limited to the following:
Current Freeboard level(s).
Freeboard level records in the lagoon(s) for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
Spraying records for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location: NR
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/AHirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
htfp://h2o. enrstate.nc.us

Inadequate Freeboard
Page 2
Rainfall records for the past 12 months for this site up to the date of submittal (if
available)
Cropping system and PAN specified iri the CAWMP. If the cropping system was not in
compliance with the facility's CAWMP, provide details of the cropping system in place
for the past 12 months.
A summary of actions taken to restore the needed freeboard in the lagoon(s) including but
not limited to removal of animals from -the site, delay of restocking of animals, pumping
and hauling waste to another site (specify citel, securing additional irrigation equipment,
and securing additional spray sites.
A description of water conservation measures in use at the facility and the date(s)
installed.
If the lagoon level(s) are still in violation of the facility's CAWMP and Permit, provide
an updated Plan of Action as to how the facility will return to compliance.
Provide a detailed description of the actions taken or proposed to be taken to insure that
there are no further freeboard violations at this facility.
This information must be received by the Wilmington Regional Office at the following
address no later than 10 days following receipt of this letter.
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-2845
Once this information is received and evaluated by the DWQ staff, a determination will
be made as to the appropriate compliance/enforcement actions to betaken. Each case will be
evaluated on its own merit. The efforts by the owner/producer to notify DWQ of the problem,
efforts made to resolve the problem once identified, and efforts proposed to prevent future
problems will be positive factors in this determination.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you either the responsibility or
liability for this non-compliance or future cases of non-compliance. If you have any questions
regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact our Wilmington Regional Office Staff at
[phone].
Sincerely
'e.
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Central Files

North Carolina
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Limestone Creek Farm
P.O. Box 702
Kenansville, NC 28349
Dear Mr. Nethercutt:
A
NCDENR
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality.
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
March 24, 2009
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Letter of Concern
Limestone Creek Farm
Facility Number: 31-182
Duplin County
This letter is a follow up to the compliance inspection conducted on March 19, 2009 by Amanda Gaines
of the Division of Water Quality. During the inspection it was noted that the record keeping and
monitoring efforts at the farm were inadequate.
• Waste analyses were not within the 60 days before and after pumping
• Freeboard levels are not being kept
• Monthly structural checks are not being noted
• Calibration of waste application equipment is overdue
• Soil analyses were not conducted
• Sludge removal was performed and no records were present
• Records and onsite representative were not available for Soil and Water Operation Review
Inspection in 2008
The following items were requested:
• Waste analysis records other than 7/22/08,10/31/08,10/3/07 or before. Forward within 30 days
of the March 19th inspection.
• Calibration of waste application equipment. Forward within 60 days of the March 19th
inspection.
o Soil samples should be collected within 30 days of the March 19`1 inspection. Forward results
within 60 days of the March 19th inspection.
• All records related to the sludge removal. Forward within 30 days of the March 19th inspection.
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaferauolitv.om
NorthCarolina
;Vaturtilly
An Equal Opportunity/Affirma live Action Employer
50% Recycled/1 07o Post Consumer Paper
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748

31 -182
march 24, 2009
If I have not received the first set of requested material by April 20, 2009, I will initiate a Notice of
Violation.
As noted in the inspection report, you were not present at the inspection. This was due to three
cancelled appointments. After the third cancellation, I indicated that you could leave the records for me
to inspect. Additionally, you failed to contact the Soil and Water inspector at any time concerning your
Operation Review at which you did not attend or make records available.
We need to discuss the importance of communication. I would like to set up a time for you to come into
our office and meet with me as well as my supervisor; Charlie Stehman, to discuss record keeping and
activities at your farm.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 910-796-7327.
Sincerely, {
Amanda Gaines
Environmental Specialist
Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regional Office
cc: John.College, DSWC-WiRO
DWQ Wilmington Animal Files 31-182
S \WQSWNIMALS\DUPLI4\20M31-182

w�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
April 22, 2009
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7006 2760 0003 3528 9233
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Limestone Creek Farm
P.O. Box 702
Kenansville, NC 28349
Dear Mr. Nethercutt:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Notice of Violation and
Recommendation for Enforcement
Case# NOV-2009-PC-0379
Limestone Creek Farm
Facility Number: 31-182
Duplin County
This is to notify you of violations of Swine Waste Management System State General Permit
AWG100000 issued on October 1, 2004. under Certificate of Coverage AWS310182.
On March 19, 2009, Ms. Amanda Gaines from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality performed a routine compliance inspection of your animal operation and the animal waste
management system serving your operation.
From the inspection, the following violations to State General Permit AWG100000 were
documented:
1. Inadequate Waste Analyses
Irrigation occurred on March 12, 2008. The dates on the waste analyses found with the records
were October 31, 2008, July 22, 2008, and all others were prior to October 3, 2007.
This is in violation of Condition 111. 5 of the State General Permit that states in part, "An analysis
of the animal waste shall be conducted in accordance with recommended laboratory sampling
procedures as close to the time of application as practical and at least within sixty (60) days
(before or after) of the date of application."
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone]
Internet: www ncwateraualitv.ora
NorthCarolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748

Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Notice of Violation and Recommendation of Enforcement
31-182
April 22, 2009,
Page 2 of 3
2. Failure to Record Weekly Freeboard Levels
There was no record found of freeboard levels being recorded since the week of October 12,
2008.
This is in violation of Condition M. 2.a of the State General Permit that states in part, "The
waste level in each lagoon with a waste level gauge sliall"be monitored and recorded weekly on
forms supplied by or approved by the Division."
3.. Record Keeping Needs Improvement
Mr. John College of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation noted during his attempted
Operations Review on October 31, 2008 that sludge removal was in progress. During the March
19, 2009 Compliance inspection, no record was found of the sludge removal, such as, sludge
waste utilization plan, sludge waste analysis, or soil samples for fields of application.
This is in violation of Condition II. 12. of the State General Permit that states in part, "At the
time of sludge removal from a lagoon/storage pond, the sludge must be managed in accordance
with the CAWMP."
The following information must be received by the Wilmington Regional Office, Division of Water
Quality within 15 working days of the receipt of this notice.
Response requirements are listed as follows:
a. A written explanation of the violation.
b.. A written description of the actions to be taken to prevent a recurrence.
c. All waste analyses from 2007, 2008, 2009 calendar years.
d. Freeboard levels front the lagoon for the 2008 and 2009 calendar years.
e. All records pertaining to the sludge removal in 2008 (including but not limited too: sludge
waste utilization plan, sludge waste analysis, soil samples for fields where sludge applied)
You may wish to contact your County Soil & Water Conservation District Office, County Extension
office, a qualified technical specialist, and/or a professional engineer for any assistance they may be able
to provide.

Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Notice of Violation and Recommendation of Enforcement
31-182
April 22, 2009
Page 3 of 3
Be advised that this office is considering recommending assessment of civil penalties to the
Director of the Division of Water Quality for the above noted violations. These violations may
result in civil penalties of up to $25,000 per violation in accordance with North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.6A(a)(2). You may also be assessed for reasonable costs of the investigation in
accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.3(a)(9). Your response will be
forwarded to the Director along with the enforcement package for his consideration. Be advised
that the Division of Water Quality may take further action in this matter including injunctive
relief and permit revocation.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call Ms. Amanda Gaines from
the Wilmington Regional Office at 910-796-7327.
Yours very. truly,
Charl�hman, Ph.D., P.G.
Environmental Program Supervisor III
Attachments
cc: Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown LLC
John College, DSWC-WiRO
APS Central Files
DWQ Wilmington Animal Files 31-182
S:\WQS\ANIMALS\DUPLIN\2009\31-182NOVREF

All 70,'/, i7
- ---------- -- -
--------- - ------ -- - ----
.....
czo-

n

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number �j% � ®Division of Soil and Water Conservation
® Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up . 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ,`/�z`7f Departure Time: ,` lip County:
Farm Name: l ' i?')F i/.. / .�r.�� %� <.�•� Owner Email:
Owner Name: / i3'i l':= /—'. _ IA L � rl'r ' Phone: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
pp_ /
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: L�z,l A
Back-up Operator:
Location, of Fart:
Swine
Region: `-�/r•\'
Phone No:
14411
Integrator:'X
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o �� � � � Longitude: Oo=, =,
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
10Non-Layer I I I
❑ Wean to Finish
Weanto Feeder
Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Dry Poultry
Pullets
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heife
E]Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Plumber of Structures: M
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
1 Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,91No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes "oNo ❑ NA ❑ NE

lFacility Number:-/�21
Date of Enspection �%z
8b ast �llectl=re azi Treatraeat e _. -
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus stcri;- ste,2ge plus heavy raii2fa.l) less than adequate?
a. if yes, is Wasie I. ai.iuciuiai freeboard?
❑ Yes 1,40
CJ Yes //❑ No
El NA ❑NE
❑ NA El NE
S+u cure 1 Structure 2 r v Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1,0
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in).
5. Are there any immediate threats to the mt=o- i)of any of i1: sti'chares obs.., .cd?
(ie/ largetrees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -size which are not properly addr'essea and/or manage{;
through a waste maifagement or ciosr=e pL 7?
[_', Yes No D NA 011IE
❑ Yes jNo f7 NA ❑ NE
if any of questions 4-6 wem arco-rercd yes, and the situadon peses are immediate public health or environmental threat, notify IDWQ
7. Do any of the seuc. cs heed maintenance or in;prover:;erz %
Eyes
No
©NA
[{ NE
8. Do any of the stud _ es lack adequate r_tarsers as ?:egnired by t'te permit
u Yes.
['Tio
❑ NA
�i P�
(Not applicable to .roofed pits, dry stacic /cr wei stacks;
9. Does any part of the r=. manage :gent s7sten7 other t..t1.s waste sr,clores =eouire
0 Yes
Ea Nc
�(NA
C NE
maintenance or ^P_prOFS77ent'
MUaste A uDlication
1 Q Are tSeS'P, arty I'egnu'eo hll;YE_:, aetbecks, Or ccin..{tiiad.eo a!_ernatives tilt need
maintenance/impreveme�tt?
❑ Yes jd ATo ❑ NA 0 NE
I ] . is there ev deuce of inca ect appiicaticnf yes, check ts.e a^ •,-oyrate box_ below. _Yes 0 No 0 NA ONE
Excessive Pond ng E) Hydrau'.ic; Overload E_1 Frozen Cirot:nd Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) J
D t AN [} PAN > 15 j nr I 0 ibs [ ,9 Teta1 Phcsp%or s ! i E ailtt r to Incorporate Il4arture/Sludge into Bare Soil
J:iTS:/;e q)�ACCe Tnr;;C tom., 1-0 `%✓indow LV Evidence r_. `Wind, Drib G Application Outside of Area
12. Crep -�T s)
13. Soil types)
C
14. Do the rec>iving crops di-' el '] rD"n trove designated in the CA 1j'AlP
[ ] Yes
No
15. Dges'che receivin€ crop a r✓cr ja /d application si_e c ce i pt,, ren.e it
Yes
0No
01NA ❑NE
El NA 0 NE
16. Did the facility fa" tc sec _-e and/or oT.efat •er the i-:, igatiou desigxa or wettable arse deter_"n_ atior_% ves _ INq ❑NA E ENE
17. Does the facility lack adequate- acreage for land appiiG tioo FlYes""E�flNo ❑ NA E7 NE
18. Is there a lack of properly+ operating waste application eyuipm:.eat % El Yes V(No DNA Q NE
Com.rventF {r�r'pl•'n T.rasi':^ Iiof ko `ir ynv?.n.. r-r-I,-a .r `1c r.c ..r .-, rt�.
Use drawings of facility to better cipl2bT, situatfers. (ase V dc, :ar*al pages as nceessarry):
,e -} �z.. �'. '7 is%.,.` 1.f- -kn-/ L.. /S 1 F �:• J' "
77
_ -•
Review ri'inspector Nas, !7 a =--- Phone:
Ibeview I /Pnsper of 6 _Sri -/! - Date;i '
2

Facility Number: �/ —J� 2, Date of ]Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes [ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
,
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
I/J Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard © Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual
Certification
❑ Rainfall []Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑
Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
t
El Yes No
❑l NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ElNo
L,d NA
-❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes D No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes /_ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
[)Yes ❑ No
)ZNA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes /P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes �/ No
ElNA
El NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes g/ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
JZNE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
'
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
[:]Yes
El NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
� lNo
El Yes l� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Af�,¢Li<<�.�
•/
9 i � r
1, LLz. -f`•) <�i/ /� rt: S L� jL v� 1�/ l'y„r.
(
`
�_ fl JG- i,�.4 f i'Y` i /, f �. �6%!-C .'_; •'C�J i �:�t.' � �/•ix--' Er
/�
L 1 /11:
rf
r,
— G�lfff"/'i=� �r� •�.�i �'r�' �%i L'✓' J'tinf'' Lt=e%�G %�fKvlr; SE- t /`'
e
r1.t
I2128104

�Division of Water Quality
FaeBl@ty 1�Iumber r �j� � 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
® Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
��/ �� 920
%/� f%D ��/j,�{�f}t
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: C' -� eparture Time: ly 'ounty: � eOL� Region:.. 20
Farm Name:
Owner Email:
Owner Name:_ 7"vLWIO //V /1/=rN1`-a ('G'7-r Phone:
Malting Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 'Title:
Onsite representative: 7-
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
0
Latitude: El
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Design. Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Laver
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
El Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other �
Dry Poultry
Pullets
Discharges 8 Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
i.ongitude: = 0 = F_� "
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
0. Yes
gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: % — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: 2_ /�_/
Spillway?: / J
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): : Z
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes IC1 No
El Yes /❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA El NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ Nr
❑ Yes [XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental) threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes ;2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 1CI No El NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? s
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes YJ No ❑ NA FINE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes IVNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop / Window El`Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
f;//
12. Crop type(s) e,77L/©ft / 11aa 1 L, /✓i: f�25�3�<)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑l Yes,,dNo
ElNA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
l� Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes Ed No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ' ONo ❑ NA FINE
Comment (refer to question # ): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other co.inments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
/ j) ek =`A
-1110 e ""/;]G/�/�
�Tlo7
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. 24 Date:
Page 2 of 3 1212 104 Continued

Facility Number: iZ Date of Inspection `��: G•(G
t
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
I4 Yes ❑ No El NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check // Yes ❑ No El NA El NE
the appropriate box.
ElWUP ❑Checklists A Design ❑ Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield �rI20 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rain Inspections [.Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
ONA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�No
El NA
El NE
❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No VNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
EINo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
31
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
i
[Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additio�nyal Comments and/or Drawings:
// 4/ yb'ki:'Gf✓
(i -._% f%j �%Y vGc - i��
_5'Y f.=- f '✓d`e`—fir''K.0 rifT
�i 1/��-1 hJ a, e�'
G
Z'01 ���
C 6%�.- `Na i Jr�Zf'.✓F.
�, d4f j%:r;� �//�( S: r..
lob, �Tx.
Lk3"J
C
! f
Page 3 of 3 /1! _ I2128104

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number a% @� DfVlSlfln. of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency .
Type of Visit 0 Compliance inspection O Operation Review —O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ,O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: A. rt ^l'Firae: �: } aE�=ps�eure ?'srre: �') County: � a.� k-�. Region:
Farm Name: 4 _ .3 .. .��>r�%�JJ!I��✓a -. .-,ts�. /�'? Owner Email: ..
Owner Name:. �v�7%%i'.� ..../� a:ft�ir t � PI)one:
flailing Addr ese:
Physical Address:.
Facility Contact: Tek[e: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: i%//IG"la�r�� . s ; fUj .'l j Integrator:
Certified OperetGr: . Operator CerifYEcation Number:
Back-up Operator: l flack -up Certiercaiion Number:
Location of ) arrt: E,z':L"it see�C:. e �I Longitude: = 0 O , O ��
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
�LaySr
❑ Non -Layer
❑
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish_�_�_
❑
Farrow to Wear.
❑
Farrow to Feeder
❑
Farrow to Finish
❑
Gilts
❑
Boars
i
Other
❑ Other
Dry Poultry
Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other _i
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
EDairyHeifei
rr
Cow
Number of Structures:
Discharges Rs Stream karts _,
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure �E Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
0
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
s0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12/28/04 Cnwinund

FacilityNumber: � —/ . P - Date of Inspection {1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the inteerit_v of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ Ni
❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Pf No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes JZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes /❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or to lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Applicaton Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) LId�J.< ? :'"f'?' ? ✓,1 F 9� _ ° f�ttha!/aJ�
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[�NO
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
19Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination', El Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
;2fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations of. any other comments
Ilse drawings of facility to better explain -situations (use additional pages as necessary)
/V466) (Gy�C..^✓7 �� G4�!=+`/�� e�u'�.4 i_ '✓.��A'�d:at 41
.?� � f�¢¢�;1 � `�Jt LE% fif �i .'G'3F=.{::fii;�" i'L�� A",•-/ p'���L��.,. A
�'� /!�/f9%.�% B�/:"'.d � ls�:ti .�1�:`ii'i%✓,S i.'✓�'�' �Pi �.%4L.���S:r� Ajf �4:�j�%�
X / ,.
Reviewer/Inspector Name phone:fL� •-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: j . 7 Date: `�r-!t
I F128/043

Facility Number: —' Date of Inspection
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
ZI Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
EA yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WLT ❑ Checklists Design ❑Maps El Other
2L
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
rr
Z Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard ,� Waste Analysis ElSoil Analysis ElWaste Transfers
ElAnnual Certification
-❑ Rainfall ElStocking 9 Crop Yield Z 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain
Inspections YTWeather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
vJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
,PffNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30:
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
'0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
A� GL '� ✓` J.'�LF'Sa 5 �G � �'C: �i1� a/lt f Fz t� i% 151A
4/5, , °t Ak 1J ✓'� (l!:lJ l S4i,'G /' t7�J �e f/w r\_ �
s7 n r
E '
�`; ll.!' �'.,�'�`4'� if/'�-� f ! %r'��l,.d' i�•(/�-a';2 G' L ��h t��� � O `�x�� � .� �.Fr--?� t��j'��o�
/r
�//s � ////�� `,` JJ �d s` 1 /f J-"'i'i f i .`t._ /'/ '!r' �//�L"%' �e': .'- F E O„':.J ":�✓�'._, „,.r1.=; gf'
J /=fs %3€✓N rG•¢+/ tf �s. f�=' r✓! �7 % �,<.� %CsS t/f �A �G /! dd'
fl'l s -� ' T Ris:.=/i=ros ✓.. /:F'c S{�' f J,_�,f�'!t1 a4'btfy 1zi..CJ.u.. _ �s e,� e!.
.JW8.�'e.h{a;a-i

of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection .Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
m for Visit *Routine 0 Complaint O Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:F .!-. / Departure Time: . n County: ZQIQ I I Region:
Farm Name: �1_i+�-rd�,�y? ��P�� �r�iLy-� Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facilitv Conlact: Title. Phone No:
Onsite ldepresmrtalive: �f,['!v� ar L'G'"•� ` i.� C�C.v.y�.LNi : \�Integrator:.�%
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Loca tiou of Farm: Latitude: =o Longitude: �o u
Swine
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
I ❑ Non -La er
Dry Poultry
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures: IZI
Discharges & Stream Impacts -
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DW Q)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of. the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 1� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
L No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
rx No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 51 — ,Y
Date of Inspection.
Waste Collection &'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): -
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan? '
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ( No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes �a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7.
Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
�I No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8.
Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
J] No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9.
Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.
Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/intgrovem ent?
11.
Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground [:]Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
_
[]PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12.
Crop type(s) Ysi'c C 7 9
13.
Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAW ?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
F4 NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
rJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comme*+ts (Fever to ques0ot,+ P).* ExplmL eny FEES £nsw'ers and/or any €eeninmendations or any other comments.
'Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
`�J�1 �`'r• �i) � .�Xi/
�"' jF"`_ r_. � 1f �t
i f A2lNZ�✓L��
Reviewe€/Inspector Name 1,10 � u Z" 11 . (y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: = Y'c _
Phone:el !0 tt °6 t �
Date: /C " 3 1 `08
/ 12128104 Continued

Facility Number -&I —/P Date of inspection !0 -3 -G
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �Vl NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 16NE
the appropirate box. ❑ qrt T ❑ Checklists ❑ Design
g El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA M' NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ( NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ({�, NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
0 NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 NA
❑ NE
(her Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA,Vj
NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify. the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Uditional Comments and/or Drawings:
'�r�'�/� � �',IJW-�-C r �j!.z� ��'�� E'�/z?.2.�,. S iU%^.,: �a3 .!/'e� v `�en<2Ci..c^•1.
.�'�'✓.z.c�,er� �,�;�, ,,�....n.��'�.tuL1�.��yr Tr,r� (��l�r/oU.;% 4� Fir: �'�'�`�-'�.
GCr tic ' Aklu I
'f
!'r7�11� � -�' cN �v!(/cif.s'fJn�� G„' �-,57Lt
.,y Up - 1 t
•-.i.p7'i :? ` Gr' lv!✓✓v: /�.:1�r.<T"../_�.t' ,� J'%J'.,�?.� .-�� '
S� J.�/•�at2 C?�.t! -� ' it 1 L � < �' - � ; ,l,-.ri✓r-a7�.
�ilCs � �� G/r�?�'� �'��d�1=t..,�GK1 .�iu ✓`,��..R-cr� �c�• 1'�!,�'�u_�_.rt . �`�,�.°ti��O?

Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit &Routine O Complaint p Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: OD
Departure Time:
County:
Region:
Farm Name: L 1 F71G Sl Cyt//= �LFK
�-A�zlC i
Owner Email:
Owner Name: F ()AIMOT /a ��7//[(tCCL1 % 7 / Phone: / 10- oQ10' I(nQ5 FcTy�/S
Mailing Address: �•�. k�C3�� K�/♦1/}/t/SiJfLLE /Y� b��� 7`�/
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
•••� capacny roptuanon
❑ Wean to Finish
jUd Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = , O Longitude: = o =
Design Current
wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La er
Dry Poultry
Pullets
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population-
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Da Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: �.
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2: Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Pagel of 3
❑ Yes 'No El NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
D424o
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection
Waste Collection &Treatment }
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: L�14<CCOV
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): .
Observed Freeboard (in): 3
❑ Yes ONO ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5.
Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yesj
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
��CC
6.
Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
" ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7.
Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8.
Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
El Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9.
Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
%,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.
Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11.
1s there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
14 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pondmg ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13.
Soil type(s) LPL �A L=:A A MCC
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
1�kNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
tANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�%,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
CCILALS1� NOT FIND W?'L�C)'= tIJEeM17 — Z C-C--�7-T R CC)(2� ON 06SIG IAI
t40'.ASI= t�IC_Orfz` GF/NSPCc711cw a,&po(LT
TM4nEIL 146i AT //✓SPP_cTia/i - APTe2 r: CPMCCL.-ATI.WS
Ne wAS -roc- HG Cr)L&Cp t_EAuP 9-Fr-62INS iv OrA/k4> "brad-
IRe viewer/Inspector Name RWQAQjq 4/161S Phone: G}id43'd�) I
Reviewer Inspector Signature: Date: ` , f %q /Q'i
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

19
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
9 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box g 0 Maps ❑ Other
0 WUP ❑ Checklists ElDesi n
2 L Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
MYes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekl Freeboard XWasteAnalysis I� Soil Analysis ❑ /aste Transfers
❑ /rnnual Certification
❑ Rainfall Q Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather Code
22..
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
_D�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
M Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
UNA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
(allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
[A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
DkNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
L4LO
CA Q
ck— 4C-- 07HE?-bA7Ec� tJ�(LG 101'�)674Ca2C3�E�4Z�
�I�(7��iteue wRcl Dczae- ary �E211nu6�A r'j-io?-C�
. ? o Cr -T VS,_ S A7 L C=,GjvC- (LIq P EfL ✓t i i , iA7
�� If A Ata.JSIS OF-714r_ AiVIMA 0/u1tAciEi1
A-r wAS7 w) -rarn/ S(&(:� �R�S�f3rEavz o4�t4�;cn�
rrsr ©A C QF pQP�,��;,nv
r�c4,q % C�—jEe�_
AAC- ut_ tTH IN
r �jc�iF i Mlle 1:v5P&C:1 PuA/
'7C.),rA VGIEAk — w4S uSGAkcusF—®8
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Facility Number: -3) — )ga Date of Inspection /9 ISGi
a 1. NO Fizce �A RFTrR Oc ic343ER /�-►�, rd�8 — SLuS �
L&-'AS (fL.EANEb O-)w �auT .VC>T AiIOTC%.
?zrASE i He— DATE St,wzc 6C /vtOuAL W W�
I OLA- ABC 1N�T��«� I"yZA1AVt`At� MowE �� IF I�l rcS �(/C�i
RAIN ouE:R d}/r 1" 11,/,4 male rH LtOtAJS71LJC nr6-E h (D I/VI ili4t i 4A i
t tC�t �OAl1�UGi f y OW (Z MONTN�J� S7fLUC-TuZAC CfiE-C�
G1UbUC: ,,q i /V C1/lI Cio0AI
LAGOON LF_UG L. V
,qL1. C4LIi�aRTIW LsJAUr r a � - ;H�e� w1S �
IT wA- S bc>N t;
-'k CALIQR�ATe Wl710IN Coo D (c S w 1=04ZWAR-p A coP:� ; o me-
'S. SCuQ�� SL1�Lt3Si�<3Ho 43 Cc�r�lV7ttt�sl �� 7� t� t���►`� �`o�
St.Q>MIT PAt [--'x ► C--.V51OA( S Iaz i OW-T
TIME _ !orsl �I/J6 Cov-Li) 4{�Lp �ou�wiit} I�u, c�SZ ► ��
(.I ICr C=OAI7-.A,--7 rWrz-= * L vti31t
p U IUD "o W/ Q�eo2hS e CID 1S C31�7ru
u� oop�Wl����3 GoR S aIV�P��acnr ii¢t5
IAlC?eC 1ION °t� tZt �f 5� 2a G�F� Zulu c fu �Ct�b S'
vLv�(JGC
©fir E ► uJ 17,
}}ERA S LLD 6C-- A
WIJ��I wASrE A -.'SAL s15) Sad-��'R��SIS!
Cr--,Q L� TO Ma UJi I /-j /i\/
C)C= 14) S, / A/SVC- c7i )cW
�n<m7

Facility Number: -y 1 — l a Date of Inspection Fy®"
( L �Z Er is j E1t� ARMS S Ll sG-evi- TO
PNbA G,"I IG
p-F�4 : Ato.41foq C04
910
i f pov.Q, ISO! 100 kits MAY jApcx- t P, l LR S s cA3CI KPIKITAVi
0?r-ep T /cvv /jvTffE FAQ., -
I ►(v���,QU� �/alc�c�� e� NAu� il�e Gt��t�L�JS AUR►�fl�f�
(�Al1�1 �� �Suu r 1v A Ra L ��ivt 501L4- �A?4_R icy
� C-pi G CA w►TH. ToGt� (G (� Ll 4�E[ r S .
A I i prE 61;- is S
E��
v��uCZ (=Ar2(Yl ��'Ck �� c3�fNEcc�R 1,S c�17<fr��
LAS i T fl M 1 d C c_-U 1 C1€ C d clvr
WADE R/l�C��A�S�d©�J� C�(Z hlEE� E®�1�CU�SS

ANIMAL WAITE, UTILIZATION PLAN
AWS3tb182
Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
IVEY TIMOTHY
PO BOX 702
RENANSVILLE NC 28349
910-296-1685
Existing Wean to Feeder
3552.00 pigs
Anaerobic Waste Tre
Irrigation
scEj
v �:D
BY. APR 1 4 20g9
.it Lag
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a i
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all p1'nt nutrients ca„be._.. »
balanced for realistic yields of the crop tolbe grown. ,
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utiLzacibn
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentaily safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown
and the nutrient content'of the waste. Do not apply more
nitrogen than the crop can utilize
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.,
3. Normally waste shall' be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre I annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or
when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may
result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed a
under DWQ regulations.
EDIDENRIDWO
QnTFcmoN gFCTION
R 0 1 7nn4
Page:1

MurphpBrown.,.'
Murphy Brown LLC
PO Box 856
2822 Hwy 24 West
Warsaw, NC 28398
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Fax Transmittal Sheet
Fax: Paces:
Pltonc: Date:
Re: CC:
❑Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle

910-271
12/10/2009
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number:
31-182
County: Duplin
Facility Name: Limestone Creek
Certified Operator Name: Timmy Nethercutt Operator Number:
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within'the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to'a site
not covered In the facility's CAW MP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
'Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
'if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 12/1712009
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Ivey Timothv Nethercutt Phone
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date:
Facility Owner/M na er (signature)

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure ID: Lagoon 1 line In = 118.8 lb PAN
2. Structure ID: Lagoon 2 line m = lb PAN
3. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 118.8lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. Crop
r. acresd2.2
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(Iblacre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
pull 1
Small Grain
26.74
61.2
Set - A ril
ull 2
Small Grain
50.00
35.5
Set - A ril
pull 3
Small Grain
33.72
42.5
Set - ADril
pull 41
Small Grain
1.991
50.00
99.5
Set -April
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 238.7 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 118.8 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) = 238.7 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = 120 lb. PAN
y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
d on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
her permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as
available for pumping if needed.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100
conditions permit. Additional land is

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): La oon 1
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 17.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 20.4 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 3.4 inches
d. lop of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 16250 ft2
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/fe 34439 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
I. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 13043 fe
h. current herd # 1776 certified herd # 1776
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 13043 It
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 9/24/2009
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
Oft,
9479.2 It
28078 gallons
1.90 Ibs/1000 gal.
118.8 Ibs. PAN

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): La oon 2
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25•yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone)
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/fts
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design
0 inches
20.41 inches
20.4 inches
16250 fl2
206635 gallons
180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 1301'1.3 ft3
h. current herd #E 1776 certified herd # 1776
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 13011 fl'
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i +j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied.during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
it.
9479.2 it
28038 gallons
Olbs/1000 gal.
0 lbs. PAN

Adr
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
July 30, 2009
CERTIFIED MAIL - #7006 2150 0003 5467 3982
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Limestone Creek Farm
PO Box 702
Kenansville, NC 28349
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for Violation(s) of
N.C. General Statute(s) 143-215.1
Farm # 31-0182
Duplin County
File No. PC-2009-0082
Permit No. (AW S310182 ,
Dear Mr. Nethercutt:
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against Ivey Timothy Nethercutt in the
amount of $2081.33, which includes $81.33 in investigative costs. Attached is a copy of the
assessment document explaining this penalty.
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation provided by the Secretary of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality. Any
continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following three items:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made to the order of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new
violation(s). Do not include the attached waiver form if making payment.
Please send payment to the attention of:
Miressa D Garoma
DWQ
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Ralegh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX 1: 919-715-0588 FAX 2: 919-715-6048 \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: w .nmatemualitv.om
AUG 0 4 2009
BY:_
NorthCarolina
Naturally
An PmmI nnm infm1 Affi anhu An,nnFmMv-

Page 2
Ivey Nelhemutt
2. Submit a written request for remission including a detailed justification for such request:
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors listed below as they
may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the
proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual
statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Because a remission request forecloses the
option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an
administrative hearing and a stipulation and `agreement that no factual or legal issues are in dispute. Please
prepare a detailed statement that establishes why you believe the civil penalty should be remitted, and submit
it to the Division of Water Quality at the address listed below. In determining whether a remission request
will be approved, the following factors shall be considered:
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in NCGS 143B-282.1(b) were
wrongfully applied to the detriment of the violator;
(2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(4) whether the violator has been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations; or
(5) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial
actions.
Please note that all evidence presented in support of your request for remission must be submitted in writing.
The Director of the Division of Water Quality will review your evidence and inform you of his decision in
the matter of your remission request. The response will provide details regarding the case status, directions
for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the Environmental Management
Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions (Committee). Please be advised that the Committee
cannot consider information that was not part of the original remission request considered by the Director.
Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and thorough statement in support of your request
for remission.
In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed "Request for Remission of Civil
Penalties, Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of Facts" form within thirty (30)
days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Quality also requests that you complete and submit the
enclosed "Justification for Remission Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following address:
Miressa D. Garoma
Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
OR
3. File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of Administrative Hearings:
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you must file a petition for an
administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You
must file the petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings during
normal office hours. The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between
the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The original and one (1) copy of the

Page 3
Ivey Nelhncutt
petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings. The petition may be faxed - provided the
original and one copy of the document is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the Office of Administrative
Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Telephone [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Ms. Mary Penny Thompson, Registered Agent
DENR
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Please mailorhand deliver a copy to:
Miressa D. Garoma
DWQ
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Please indicate the case number (as found on page one of this letter) on the petition.
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter, as evidenced by
an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter being referred to the Attorney
General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil action. Please be advised that additional
penalties may be assessed for violations that occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Miressa D. Garoma at [phone].
Sincerely,
Theodore L. Bush, Jr., Chief
Aquifer Protection Section
Division of Water Quality
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Charles Stehman, Wilmington APS Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Amanda Gains, Wilmington APS Regional Office w/ attachments
File # PC-2009-0082 w/ attachments
APS Central Files w/ attachments
Susan Massengale w/ attachment

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF DUPLIN
IN THE MATTER OF
IVEY TIMOTHY NETHERCUTT
FOR VIOLATIONS OF SWINE WASTE
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GENERAL
PERMIT AW G 100000
PURSUANT TO NORTH CAROLINA
GENERAL STATUE 143-215.1
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
File No. PC-2009-0082
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Theodore L. Bush, Jr., Chief of
the Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water (DWQ), make the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt owns and operates the Limestone Creek Farm, a permitted
swine animal feeding operation in Duplin County.
B. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt was issued Certificate of Coverage AWS310182 under Swine
Waste Management System General Permit AWG100000 for the Limestone Creek Farm
on October 1, 2004, effective upon issuance, with an expiration date of September, 30
2009.
C. Condition No. 111. 5. of the General Permit AWG100000 states in part that "An analysis
of the animal waste shall be conducted in accordance with recommended laboratory
sampling procedures as close to the time of application as practical and at least within
sixty (60) days (before and after) of the date of application."
D. Condition No. III. 2.a of the General Permit AWG100000 states in part that, "The waste
level in each lagoon with a waste level gauge shall be monitored and recorded weekly on
forms supplied by or approved by the Division"
E. Condition 11. 12. of the General Permit AWGI00000 states in part that, "At the time of
sludge removal from a lagoon/storage pond, the sludge must be managed in accordance
with the CAWMP."
F. DWQ staff from the Wilmington Regional Office inspected Limestone Creek Farm on
March 19, 2009 and found that irrigation had occurred on the farm and the waste
analyses in the records were inadequate. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt has been notified on
three previous inspections (July 2005, April 2006, and June 2007) that his waste analyses
were not meeting the permit requirements.

G. On March 19, 2009, it was discovered that the waste level of the lagoon had not been
recorded since the week of October 12, 2008.
H. On October 31, 2008, the Division of Soil and Water Conservation noted that a sludge
removal was in progress. On March 19, 2009, it was discovered that there was no record
of the sludge removal, and no records related to land application of the sludge.
I. DWQ responded by issuing the facility a Notice of Intent to Enforce on April 22, 2009.
The costs to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $81.33.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant
to G.S.143-212(4).
B. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by G.S. 143-215.1.
C. The above -cited failure to conduct waste analyses within sixty days of the date of
application violated Condition No. 111. 5. of the General Permit.
D. The above -cited failure to record weekly freeboard levels violated Condition No. III. 2.a
of the General Permit.
E. The above -cited failure to produce records to show sludge removal was managed in
accordance with the CAWMP violated Condition 11. 12. of the General Permit.
F. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt may be assessed civil penalties pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2) which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand
dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who violates or fails
to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit required by
G.S. 143-215.1.
G. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Ivey Timothy
Nethercutt pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282. I (b)(8).
H. The Chief of the Aquifer Protection Section, Division of Water Quality, pursuant to
delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, has the authority to assess
civil penalties in this matter.

Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
DECISION:
Accordingly, Ivey Timothy Nethercutt, owner of Limestone Creek farm, is hereby assessed a
civil penalty of:
$ t� for violating Condition No. 111. 5. of the General Permit AWG 100000 by
failing to conduct waste analyses within sixty days of the date of
application
$ for violating Condition No. 111. 2.a of the General Permit AWG100000
by failing to record freeboard levels weekly on forms supplied by or
approved by the Division
00
$ for violating Condition No. II. 12. of the General Permit AWG100000
by failing to produce records to show sludge removal was managed
according to the CAWMP
od
$ ? V 0 f7 Total Civil Penalty
$ 81.33 Enforcement costs
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I considered the
factors listed in G.S. 143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health,
or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date) 4eodore L. Bush, Jr., Chief
Aquifer Protection Section
Division of Water Quality

Supply Warehouse
MB Fax Cover
AAff ftamm ix Sheet
769 Hwy 24150 East
Warsaw NC.29398
Data: 5-18- ay
From: —( trGui. Itlb>£iS��
Re:
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Number of pages Including cover sheet) Z
"ED
MAY 18 2009
BY:

M
AUC-25-2005 07:20PM FROIF 7-332 P.002/002 F-445
^` rHA Mu. J1F5G SSA 1 Aug. 25 2085 03:48PM P2
IRRIGATION EQU(Ph2ENT WELD C_%LMRAI ION FORM
LOCATION:
:JATF. of FIELD CAURRATION: — :r' 1 " . A 4
(mm/ddlyy)
FLOW NMTER SP-RIA,I.. NLIMBEP: _,_
!4EASi;RED RMG SIZE: �t7 `� 1 inches
Is ring size within 0.01" of eri&a] manufactured size? yes no
[F NOT REPLACE RING.
PRESSURE GAUGE READfNGS At Pump: /16&�` psi
�1 j) At Tirnvelec: ld psi(if anplimbie)
AtSprinkler(Gua: 74psi
sFXMC'TED FLOW RATE( fram manufacture chart): GPni
MEASURE FLOWRRATIE(from Row meter):
GPM
Flour rate variance greater thAn t 0% yes no
EXPECTED WETTED DLUMETER( from wetted acres determination): ft.
MFASCRED WMEDDLAMET.EP: /xa it
Wetted diameter vnriancelgreaterthan I501P yes no
IFM LS A-NSWERM TO EI'TIIER FLOPS' RATE OR'WETTED OLCMETER
VARLOUNCE, CONTACT AN IRRIGATION SPECIALIST FOR/ASSISTANCE.
comments: l// �✓ `�/:-.. �1� /e' r 'r7;-7t -
.^.sl:brstot:
'• Ysig�atare) ,

NCDAKS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone]. Web Site: www.acagr,com/agrenomi/
Report No:
40793
Groroor
NethercuMIvey/Timothy/Laura
Captar7b:
,.
�t '�`+"�
c/oLimestone Greek farm
/r
lir
�Sod Test
PO Box 702
Kemmsville, NC 28349
-
.Deport
Farm 31-182
4/28/2009 SCRVINC N.C. RESIDENTS WK uyu 6o YEMLS
Duplin County
Agronomist Connnents
f, -• 12, $
Field information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year dime
N P20Y K20
At S
Ca
Zn B
Ma
See Note
01
Isl Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,E 0
60-80 2040 20.40
0 20.25
0
0
$
12
_
2nd Crop:
20.25
Test Results
soil class M% W/V
CBC BS% Ac pH P-1 K•I Ca% 4t%
Mn-1 Mn-Al(1)MrpAi(2) Zn-I
Zn-Ar
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
NO,r-N AH4-N Na
MIN 0.13 1.36
3.2 84.0 0.5 7.0 56 60 50.0 25.0
28 19 534
534
55
15
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year I,tnre
IV P203 K20
Afq S
Cu
Za B
Mn
See Note
02
1st Crop: Senn llay/Pas,F. 0
6U-80 0 0
0 0
0
0
$
12
2nd Crop:
0
Test Results
Sot(Class Im% 1V/V
CBC BS% Ae pH P-1 K-I Ca% ft%
Mn-1 WAl(1)M&A[Q) Zu-1
Zn-N
CO-1
S-I
SS-1
At13•N NIaN Na
MIN 0.13 1.30
6.1 87.0 o.8 6.9 387 113 62.0 16.0
28 20 1687
1697
249
27
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
No Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lima
N P203 K20
h(q S
Cu
7n B
Mn
See Nate
03
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,E 1.3T
60-80 0 30.50
0 20.25
0
0
$
12
2nd Crop:
20-25
Test Results
Soil class I6N% W/V
CBC BS% Ac pH P-1 R1 Ca% h"
h8rl Mn-Al(1)WAl(2) Zn-1
Zn-A►
Ca-1
S•r
SS -I
AD3-N AH4-N Na
MIN 0.22 1.42
4.1 63.0 1.5 5.7 283 49 42.0 15.0
25 24 1644
1644
245
22
0.1
Field information
A plied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
P205 K20
S
6'a
Za R
Mn
See Note
04
Ist Crop: Berm Ilay/Pas,E 0
60-80 40-60 0
0 15.20
U
0
pH$
12
2ud Crop:
15-20
Test Results
Soil Class IM% IV/V
OW BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% dig%
Mn-1 My;-A1(2) Zu-1
Zn-Ar
0-1
S-1
SS-1
NO3•N Nr4-N Na
. MIN 0 36 1.19
8.7 94.0 0.5 7.2 44 140 59.0 270
46 26 431
431
81
25
0.l

vr
1AUG-2572006 MaPO 'FRbm-.- tk •, q - , ti, T-032 P-0021GOV. -.F744
1-HA NU.
25 2005 03:4SF,"'
.
ov%
i T�
Ly¢tpS;'4�9
NTOPUM
IRRIQATAGN MIJOYMN'T FTEL C I
• 70�-
4)L.N;
s)*
,A , NaA*.1OCATION,% - . A , 4 .01., A
.1 V.
'T
LTBRATION; Or. lot
.4ATF of FIELD CA
qW METERS!
EQUIPMENT OU
L
1., 3
inc as EASED R1;M ERS _4F. 1w_V_to
n*
91L H ring size withinAM" hf oilginAl, n1ftf0f1i4#4
re sma.", v
�rot
N %
,A
b so, P-1
ESSUAFiCxAX!rG, Psi,,
PR VIRtIADIN(iS
Tnavcler: 44�14
14, - i� 4 . .
le
I 4w
4l- -%A v q
wo
UXPECTE-0 FK-U'VV* accurc it 4
1;
- c f I
A
-A
-MLAsuft FLOW. tr ter):
.
te
t", A-, so. Cz4.,
F1wrate-Zartance great t
at m a� 's j�4.'
. 19
FA b-
elenuma on
V N
[AE-DAW-Ow ryn nT4'M
'ETTIED DLQA1
4
. .Wetted�uiahnektw k-A l, anance grem
4 N
WEALS AASWXAW, ""ET!,
m
MARIANCEOJ VTACTAN I
to f
Pe 7
T
el
p ,
♦1 V.. � .. I �! , 4 .,
p
D�(
,�Tt,OR WE
•im -LYTT e rw Ab
k; L 14 ht' ': . L
Y
�
m

tv
O
Cp
HARVEY FERTILIZER & GAS
1060 S. NC 41 & 111
BEULAVILLE, N.C. 28518
[phone]
[phone]
Customer's
Order No. Date 20
Name
Address
Phone:
SOLD By
QUAN.
CASH C.O.D. CHARGE ON ACCT. MOSS RETD. PAID OUT
DESCRIPTION
%1,AI1 Claims„anntl returned gootls,MUST•be accompanietl bi,tais'blll^,",
TAX
Co5 �, R 1 F Received
By
TOTAL
PRINTED rninru wxx Q,`/
PRINTED IN USA env iuv , //77/I/Lr 1 iO.r�

4
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
March 24, 2009
Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Limestone Creek Farm
P.O. Box 702
Kenansville, NC 28349
Dear Mr. Nethercutt:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Letter of Concern
Limestone Creek Farm
Facility Number: 31-182
Duplin County
This letter is a follow up to the compliance inspection conducted on March 19, 2009 by Amanda Gaines
of the Division of Water Quality. During the inspection it was noted that the record keeping and
monitoring efforts at the farm were inadequate.
• Waste analyses were not within the 60 days before and after pumping
• Freeboard levels are not being kept
• Monthly structural checks are not being noted
• Calibration of waste application equipment is overdue
• Soil analyses were not conducted
• Sludge removal was performed and no records were present
• Records and onsite representative were not available for Soil and Water Operation Review
Inspection in 2008
The following items were requested:
• Waste analysis records other than 7/22/08,10/31/08,10/3/07 or before. Forward within 30 days
of the March 19`h inspection.
• Calibration of waste application equipment. Forward within 60 days of the March 19'h
inspection.
• Soil samples should be collected within 30 days of the March 19rh inspection. Forward results
within 60 days of the March 19`h inspection.
• All records related to the sludge removal. Forward within 30 days of the March 19'h inspection.
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwateraualitv.org
NorthCarolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50%Recycled/ 10%Post Consumer Paper
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748

Letter of Concern
31-182
MarAh 24, 2009
If I have not received the first set of requested material by April 20, 2009,1 will initiate a Notice of
Violation.
As noted in the inspection report, you were not present at the inspection. This was due to three
cancelled appointments. After the third cancellation, I indicated that you could leave the records for me
to inspect. Additionally, you failed to contact the Soil and Water inspector at any time concerning your
Operation Review at which you did not attend or make records available.
We need to discuss the importance of communication. I would like to set up a time for you to come into
our office and meet with me as well as my supervisor, Charlie Stehman, to discuss record keeping and
activities at your farm.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 910-796-7327.
Sincerely,
Amanda Gaines
Environmental Specialist.
Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regional Office
cc: John College, DSWC-WiRO
DWQ Wilmington Animal Files 31-182
SAWQS WNIMALS\DUPLM009\31-182

NARRATIVE: Use this section to describe the method(s) that will be used to lower the sludge
depth. If microbe use is planned, specify the product to be used.
ZO p.✓s �f EN quiz ��r�v,c L�/
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached
Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and
correct.
2 6G 7-*07,4-L/ Z f 7fi2� IL a'7y Phone: - �G
Facility Owner/Manager(print)
-- P/0 -,2 9 U " !/B b�j CLc7.
_f Dater !�-O
cility Owner/M a r (signature)
Return this form to:
!�( J Animal Feeding Operations Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
SPOA 10-18-04 Page 2 of 2

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
December 10, 2003
Mr. Timothy Nethercutt
P.O. Box 702
Kenansville, NC 28349
Subject: Rescission of Notice of Violation /
Issuance of Notice of Deficiency
Limestone Creek Farm
Facility # 31-182
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Nethercutt:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Thank you for your recent submittal of the information requested in our letter dated April 15,
2003. We greatly appreciate the effort that you made in compiling this information and sending
it to our Wilmington Regional Office by the date required. We also appreciate the fact that you
reported the problem with high freeboard to our staff as required by your permit and worked with
our staff to manage the problem once it occurred.
Upon review and consideration of the information submitted, the Wilmington Regional Office has
determined that no further compliance/enforcement actions will be taken by the Division for
these high freeboards.
Also, based on your actions to properly operate your facility, the Division of Water Quality
hereby rescinds the Notice of Violation that was issued to you on April 15, 2003 and replaces it
with this Notice of Deficiency.
In the future, please continue to evaluate ways to maintain freeboard levels in the required range.
These methods include, but are not limited to, water conservation practices, adding additional
application sites, updating your cropping systems, adding additional and/or more flexible
application equipment, and maintaining the lagoon levels at the lowest allowable and appropriate
levels throughout the year. Our staff looks forward to continuing to work with you and your
Technical Specialist to evaluate and implement any needed changes to your system.
Customer Service:
1 800 623-7748
Mailing Address:
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
WWI
iTMENR
Telephone: [phone] Location:
Fax: [phone] N. Salisbury St
State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity iAffirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us

Inadequate Freeboard
Timothy Nethercutt
December 10, 2003 _
Page 2
Thank you again for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact the staff of our Wilmington Regional Office at 910-395-3900.,
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
CC: Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown, LLC
Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Patrick Fussell, DSWC
Wilmington Files 31-182
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Central Files

April 16, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ivey T. Nethercutt
PO Box 702
Kenansville NC 28349
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Request for Information
Inadequate Freeboard
Limestone Creek Farm
#31-182
Duplin County
Dear Sir or Madam:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
On March 6, 2003, a representative of your animal operation informed the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) that there was inadequate freeboard in the lagoon(s) serving this facility.
This lack of adequate freeboard is in non-compliance with the Certificate of Coverage
issued to this facility on December 18, 2000. In addition to this Notice of Violation (NOV), this
non-compliance is subject to an appropriate enforcement action by DWQ. This action can
consist of one or more of the following: a civil or criminal enforcement action; an injunction;
and/or a requirement to apply for coverage under an individual permit. The action chosen will
be based on complete evaluation of all factors that resulted in the inadequate freeboard; the
actions taken to restore the needed freeboard; and the actions being proposed to prevent the
problem from reoccurring.
To assist . us in our review, please provide the Wilmington Regional Office with an
evaluation of the reasons for the freeboard violation(s) and a strategy to prevent future freeboard
violation(s). This evaluation and strategy must include but is not limited to the following:
Current Freeboard level(s)
Freeboard level records in the lagoon(s) for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
Spraying records for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
NMIMR
Customer service. Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affimrative Action Employer
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
httpJ/h2o.enrstate.nc.us -

Inadequate Freeboard
Page 2
Rainfall records for the past 12 months for this site up to the date of submittal (if
available)
Cropping system and PAN specified in the CAWMP. If the cropping system was not in
compliance with the facility's CAWMP, provide details of the cropping system in place
for the past 12 months.
A summary of actions taken to restore the needed freeboard in the lagoon(s) including but
not limited to removal of animals from the site, delay of restocking of animals, pumping
and hauling waste to another site (specify site), securing additional irrigation equipment,
and securing additional spray sites.
A description of water conservation measures in use at the facility and the date(s)
installed.
If the lagoon level(s) are still in violation of the facility's CAWMP and Permit, provide
an updated Plan of Action as to how the facility will.retutn to compliance.
Provide a detailed description of the actions taken or proposed to be taken to insure that
there are no further freeboard violations at this facility.
This information must be received by the Wilmington Regional Office at the following
address no later than 10 days following receipt of this letter.
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-2845
Once this information is received and evaluated by the DWQ staff, a determination will
be made as to the appropriate compliance/enforcement actions to be taken. Each case will be
evaluated on its own merit. The efforts by the owner/producer to notify DWQ of the problem,
efforts made to resolve the problem once identified, and efforts proposed to prevent future
problems will be positive factors in this determination.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you either the responsibility or
liability for this non-compliance or future cases of non-compliance. If you have any questions
regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact our Wilmington Regional Office Staff at
[phone].
Sincerely
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Central Files

lkvj
..�
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
September 8, 2009
Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Limestone Creek Farm
PO Box 702
Kenansville, NC 28349
RE: Acknowledgment of Receipt of Payment
Case No. PC-2009-0082
Farm # 31-0182
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Nethercutt:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of.your check No. 1546 in the amount of $2081.33 on
September 8, 2009.. This payment satisfies in -full the civil assessment in the amount of $2081.33
levied against Ivey Timothy Nethercutt and the case has been closed. If you have any questions, -
please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Charles Stehman, Wilmington APS Regional Supervisor
File # PC-2009-0082
APS Central Files
RZCEYVY_
BY:
SEP 0 9 2009
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION One
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Caro'ina 27699-1636 NorthCaroltna
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 �a'tKt+Ull J/
Phone:[phone]\FAX 1: 919-715-05N FAX 2:919-715-6048\ Customer Service: 1-871-623-6748
Internet: wvr+v.nmatemuahtyom

_r
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Limestone Creek Farm
P.O. Box 702
Kenansville, NC 28349
Dear Mr. Nethercutt
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
June 10, 2009
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: RETRACTION OF NOV-2009-PC-0465
Limestone Creek Farm
Facility Number: 31-182
Duplin County
This letter is to notify you that the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is retracting the Notice of
Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement (NOV-2009-PC-0465) issued to Mr. Ivey Timothy
Nethercutt, Limestone Creek Farms on May 21, 2009 for failure to calibrate irrigation equipment and
failure to perform a standard soil fertility analysis. Although the Division received the documents
requested prior to the issuance of the Notice of Violation (NOV), the documents were not sufficient.
However, you did comply with the request for a clear copy of the calibration sheet. The soil report
submitted by you did not cover the 2008 crop year; however, Mr. John College from the Division of Soil
and Water printed your soil samples to cover the 2008 crop year from the USDA website. The Division
will accept both of these as an acceptable response to the requested material
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone]
Internet: w .ncwaterauatity ora
NorthCarolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% Recycied/ l0% Post Consumer Paper
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748

Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
31-182
Retraction
.tune 10, 2009
Page 2 of
This letter of retraction is for the NOV-2009-PC-0465 NOV only and does not account for the
April22, 2009 NOV (NOV-1009-PC-0379). If you have any questions please do not hesitate to
call Amanda Gaines at [phone]. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Yo>VVery Truly,,
Charles FIhman, Ph.D., P.G.
Environmental Program supervisor III
cc: Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Kraig Westerbeek,.Murphy-Brown LLC
John College, DSWC-WiRO
APS Central Files
DWQ Wilmington Animal Files 31-182
S:\W QS\ANIM A LS\DUPLIN\2009\3I-182Retr-acd on(M ay2009NO V)

r
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Limestone Creek Farm
P.O. Box 702
Kenansville, NC 28349
Dear Mr. Nethercutt:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
May 28, 2009
Natural Resources
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Follow up to Notice of Violation and
Recommendation for Enforcement
dated May 21, 2009
Case# NOV-2009-PC-0465
Limestone Creek Farm
Facility Number: 31-182
Duplin County
It has come to our attention that this office received a soil sample result and calibration sheet on May 18,
2009, the last day in your allotted time to get material to our office. After reviewing the material sent by
facsimile, the calibration sheet we received is not clear. This office would like you to provide a clear
copy of the calibration sheet. Once we have received and reviewed the clear copy we will look into
rescinding the May 21, 2009 Notice of Violation that was issued for failure to present the requested
material (soil sample result and calibration).
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at 910-796-7327.
II Sincerely,
Amanda Gaines
Environmental Specialist
cc: Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown LLC
John College, DSWC-WiRO
APS Central Files
DWQ Wilmington Animal Files 31-182
S:\WQS\ANIMALS\DUPLIN\2009\31-182letter
Wilmington Regional Office
One
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405
NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone].2004
Internet: vvww.ncwaterauraualiiv ora
Naturally
`/ly
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
50% Recycled/ 10% Post Consumer Paper

r
NCDEENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
May 21, 2009
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7006 2760 0003 3528 9240
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Limestone Creek Farm
P.O. Box 702
Kenansville, NC 28349
Dear Mr. Nethercutt:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Notice of Violation and
Recommendation for Enforcement
Case# NOV-2009-PC-0465
Limestone Creek Farm
Facility Number: 31-182
Duplin County
This is to notify you of violations of Swine Waste Management System State General Permit
AWG100000 issued on October 1, 2004 under Certificate of Coverage AWS310182.
On March 19, 2009, Ms. Amanda Gaines from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality performed a routine compliance inspection of your animal operation and the animal waste
management system serving your operation.
From the inspection, the following violations to State General Permit AWG100000 were
documented:
1. Failure to Calibrate Irrigation. Equipment
Calibration for the irrigation equipment was due in 2008 and no calibration was found with the
farm records.
This is in violation of Condition II. 24 of the State General Permit that states in part, "All waste
application equipment must be tested and calibrated once in the first two years after issuance of
the COC and then at least once every two years thereafter."
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone]
Internet: w ncwoteraualitvora
NorthCarolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748

Mr. lvey Timothy Nethercutt
Notice of Violation and Recommendation of Enforcement
31-182
May 21, 2009
Page 2 of 3
2. Failure to Perform a Standard Soil Fertility Analysis
There was no soil analysis found for 2008.
This is in violation of Condition 111. 4. of the State General Permit that states in part, "A
representative Standard Soil Fertility Analysis,...,shall be conducted on each application field
receiving animal waste.... the Statute requires that the analysis be conducted at least annually."
The following information must be received by the Wilmington Regional Office, Division of Water
Quality within 15 working days of the receipt of this notice.
Response requirements are listed as follows:
a. A written explanation of the violation.
b. A written description of the actions to be taken to prevent a recurrence.
c. A calibration for all irrigation equipment for 2008 or the most recent calibration.
d. Soil sample results for 2008 or the most recent results.
You may wish to contact your County Soil & Water Conservation District Office, County Extension
office, a qualified technical specialist, and/or a professional engineer for any assistance they may be able
to provide..
Be advised that this office is considering recommending assessment of civil penalties to the
Director of the Division of Water Quality for the above noted violations. These violations may
result in civil penalties of up to $25,000 per violation in accordance with North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.6A(a)(2). You may also be assessed for reasonable costs of the investigation in i
accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.3(a)(9). Your response will be
forwarded to the Director along with the enforcement package for his consideration. Be advised
that the Division of Water Quality may take further action in this matter including injunctive
relief and permit revocation.

Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Notice of Violation and Recommendation of Enforcement
3T `182
May 21, 2009
Page 3 of 3
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call Ms. Amanda Gaines from
the Wilmington Regional Office at 910-796-7327.
Yours very truly,
Charles fehman, Ph- D., P.G.
Environmental Program Supervisor III
Attachments
cc: Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown LLC
John College, DSWC-WiRO
APS Central Files
DWQ Wilmington Animal Files 31-182
S:\WQS\ANIMALS\DUPLIN\2009\31-182NOVREF(May2009)

4
NCDEE R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
May 21, 2009
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7006 2760 0003 3528 9240
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Limestone Creek Farm
P.O. Box 702
Kenansville, NC 28349
Subject: Notice of Violation and
Recommendation for Enforcement
Case# NOV-2009-PC-0465
Limestone Creek Farm
Facility Number: 31-182
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Nethercutt:
This is to notify you of violations of Swine Waste Management System State General Permit
AWG100000 issued on October 1, 2004 under Certificate of Coverage AWS310182.
On March 19, 2009, Ms. Amanda Gaines from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality performed a routine compliance inspection of your animal operation and the animal waste
management system serving your operation.
From the inspection, the following violations to State General Permit AWG100000 were
documented:
1. Failure to Calibrate Irrigation Equipment
Calibration for the irrigation equipment was due in 2008 and no calibration was found with the
farm records.
This is in violation of Condition 11. 24 of the State General Permit that states in part, "All waste
application equipment must be tested and calibrated once in the first two years after issuance of
the COC and then at least once every two years thereafter."
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone]
Internet: w ncwaterauality ora
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
None
rthCarolina
Natwa!!y
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748

Mr. Ivey `Timothy Nether cutt
Notice of Violation and Recommendation of Enforcement
31-182 -•
May 21, 2009
Page 2 of 3
2. Failure to Perform a Standard Soil Fertility Analysis
There was no soil analysis found for 2008.
This is in violation of Condition III. 4. of the State General Permit that states in part, "A
representative Standard Soil Fertility Analysis,...,shall be conducted on each application field
receiving animal waste.... the Statute requires that the analysis be conducted at least annually."
The following information must be received by the Wilmington Regional Office, Division of Water
Quality within 15 working days of the receipt of this notice.
Response requirements are listed as follows:
a. A written explanation of the violation.
b. A written description of the actions to be taken to prevent a recurrence.
c. A calibration for all irrigation equipment for 2008 or the most recent calibration.
d. Soil sample results for 2008 or the most recent results.
You may wish to contact your County Soil & Water Conservation District Office, County Extension
office, a qualified technical specialist, and/or a professional engineer for any assistance they may be able
to provide.
Be advised that this office is considering recommending assessment of civil penalties to the
Director of the Division of Water Quality for the above noted violations. These violations may
result in civil penalties of up to $25,000 per violation in accordance with North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.6A(a)(2). You may also be assessed for reasonable costs of the investigation in
accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.3(a)(9). Your response will be
forwarded to the Director along with the enforcement package for his consideration. Be advised
that the Division of Water Quality may take further action in this matter including injunctive
relief and permit revocation.

Mr. Ivey Timothy Nethercutt
Notice of Violation and Recommendation of Enforcement
31-182
May 21, 2009
Page 3 of 3
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call Ms. Amanda Gaines from
the Wilmington Regional Office at 910-796-7327.
Yours very t]rruuly,
Charles fehman, Ph.D., P.G.
Environmental Program Supervisor III
Attachments
cc: Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown LLC
John College, DSWC-WiRO
APS Central Files
DWQ Wilmington Animal Files 31-182
S A W QS\ANIMALS\DUP LIN\2009\31-182NO V P EF(May2009)

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Mr '
L.lr>7c5�nL �j-cc� ��•�
i�enanSJt 1��� Ne- 9?3119
A
X
by (Plinte4 Name) i C.
Agent
D. Is del" address different from item 1 V ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mall
Registered *Rehm Receipt for Merchandise
14. Restricted Delivery? /Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number 77006 77 2760 '0003'�35281,92.40 't
r (rransler hom serNce f W i
Ps Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595o2-ee-1510

NCDCS Agronomic Division
Phone: [phone] Web site: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No: 36863
r
_ s
Teortp
Soil est RFarm:
Grower:
Nethercutt, Ivey/Timothy/Laura Copies To:
r/oLimestone Creek Farm
PO Box 702
Kenansvllle, NC 28349
�.
05/17/20007 SERVING
N.C. RESIDENTS
FOR OVER 60 YEARS
Forsyth County
Agronomist Lo_mments' -
-
3, 12, $
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Me Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20 Mg S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
Pl
Ist Crop: Small Grains
1.9T
80-100
0
10-30 0 0
0
0
.0 10
3
2nd Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M
0
180-220
0
(10-80 0 0
0
0
$
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CBC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-I
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-I
SS-1 NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.6 1.31
4.7 55.0
2.1 5.4 561 69
34.0
14.0
24
17
24 1465 1465
302
29
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. last Crop
Me Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20 Mg S
Cu
Zn
8 Mn
See Note
P2
1s( Crop: Small Grains
2.2T
80-100
0
0-20 0 0
0
0
.0 10
3
2nd Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M
0
180-220
0
50-70 0 0
0
0
$
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CBC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-I
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-1
SS-1 NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.66 1.37
5.0 52.0
2.4 5.3 - 608 77
31.0
130
23
16
23 1530 1530
309
32
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. last Crop
Me Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20 Mg S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
P3
Ist Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
0
0 0 0
0
0
.0 $pII
3
2nd Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M
0
180-220
0
0 0 0
0
0
$
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CBC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-I
SS -I NO7-N
NH4-N
Na
ORG 5.53 1.23
13.2 90.0
1.3 7.0 137 472
46.0
26.0
5
-2
5 225 374
38
31
0.6
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Me Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20 Mg S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
P4
Ist Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
0
0 0 15-20
0
0
.0 pH$
3
2nd Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M
0
I80.220
0
0 0 15-20
0
0
pH$
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CBC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-I
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2) Znd Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-I
SS-1 NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.81 1.16
9.3 91.0
0.8 6.7 152 220
56.0
24.0
78
46
53 555 555
125
22
0.2

NOWS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Web site: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/ Report No: 36863
,North Carol i ha
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services !a manage nufrienls and safeguard environmental quality.
-
-Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture
Tobacco Trust Fund Commission
i.•

NCDA&CS.Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Web site: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No: 40793
�• ,,,,-'-.w„
r 4,,
• �! <
oil Test Report
Grower:
Nethercutt, lveyjimothy/Laura Copies 7b.
UoLimestone Creek Farm
PO Box 702
(/o
Kenansville, NC 28349Sn I
"umuvn,ar,
Pantt:
31-182
04/24/2009
SERVING N.C. RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS
Duplin County
Agronomist Comments
12, $
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last
Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn
See Note
01
Is( Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,E
0
60-80
2040
20-40 0 20-25 0 0 $
12
2nd Crop:
20-25
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Ca-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N
AWN Na
MIN 0.13
1.36 3.2 84.0
0.5 7.0 56 60
50.0
25.0
28
19
534 534 55 15
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last
Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20 . Mg S Cu Zn B Mn
See Note
02
1st Crop: Berm Ilay/Pas,E
0
60-80
0
0 0 0 0 0 $
12
2nd Crop:
0
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mnd
Mn-AI(7)
Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-Al Cud S-1 SS -I NO3-N
NH4-N Na
MIN 0.13
1.30 6.1 87.0
0.8 6.9 387 113
62.0
16.o
28
20
1687 1687 249 27
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
PZ05
K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn
See Note
03
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,E
1.3T
60-80
0
30-50 0 20-25 0 0 $
12
2nd Crop:
20-25
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I K-I
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-I
Mn-AI(])
Mn-AI(2) Znd Zn-41 Cu4 S-I SS-1 NO3-N
N714-N Na
MIN 0.22
1.42 4.1 63.0
1.5 5.7 283 49
42.o
15.0
25
24
1644 1644 245 22
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P203
K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn
See Note
04
Isl Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,E
0
60-80
40-6o
0 0 15.20 0 0 pH$
12
2nd Crop:
15-20
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(I)
Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-Al Cu-1 S-1 SS -I NO3-N
NH4-N Na
MIN 0.36
1.19 8.7 94.0
0.5 7.2 44 140
59.0
27.0
46
26
431 431 81 25
0.1

NCDAUS_Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Web site: www.neagr.gov/agronomi/ Report No: 40793
North Carolina Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
[A-
Thankyoufor° " using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture
bacco Trust Fund Commnssion

NCDA&CS tlgronomic Division Phone: [phone] Web site: www.neagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No: 16126
Grower.
Nelhercutt,lvey/1'imothy/Laura
Copies To:
c/oLlnhestone Creek Farm
Soil Test
PO Box 702
Kenansville, NC 28349
Report
Pam: 31-182
12/20/2007 SERVING N.C. RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS
County
Du P tY
Agronomist Comments
"C" "Z"
I!
�{
3 12 $
ATTENTION: This report was Ragged with a and/or to alert you that copper and/or zinc have accumulated in
the soil and are approaching a level that could be detrimental to crop production. The C and Z symbols are printed
on your report for soil test index levels of 2000 or more; for peanuts with zinc, the level is 300. This note is
designed to be a "trigger" that allows enough time to either reduce the rate of application or find another field for
O
application of biosolids and/or waste water. The CTL (critical toxic level) for Cu & Zn has been set at 3000 index;
for peanuts with zinc, the level is 500. These levels are used by DENR as a benchmark to determine when
application of waste products should be stopped. The CTL for copper and zinc was set to prevent levels from
accumulating to the point where they become toxic to crops grown on a field.
David H. Hardy} Agronomist
December 21, 2007
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
N P203 K20 Mg S
Cu Zn B Mn See Note
00001
1st Crop: Small Grains 0
80-100 0 0 0 20-25
0 0 .0 pH$ 3
2nd Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,E 0
60-80 0 0 0 20-25
0 0 pH$ 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-A1(7) Mn-AI(2) Zn4 Zn-Al
Cu4 S-I SS-1 NO3-N NHt-N Na
MIN 0.32 1.32 5.4 93.0 0.4 6.8 102 127 60.0 21.0
112 65 72 604 604
85 20 0.2
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
N P205 K20 Mg S
Cu Zn B Mn See Note
00002
1st Crop: Small Grains 1.2T
80-100 0 0 0 20-25
0 Z .0 0 3
2nd Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,E 0
60-80 0 0 0 20-25
0 Z 0 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-A1(I) Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-Al
Cu-I S-1 SS-1 NO3-N NHa-N Na
MIN 0.22 1.30 4.9 710 1.3 5.5 282 119 44.0 17.0
43 28 35 2114 2114
295 19 0.1

NCDA&CS;Agronomic Division
Phone: [phone] Web site: www.neagr.gov/agronomi/
Grower: Nethercult, Ivey/fimoth
Report No: 16126
Pg 2
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Me Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
00003
Isl Crop: Small Grains
.8T
80-100
0
0
0 20-25
0
2
.0 0
3
2nd Crop: Bern[lay/Pas,E
0
60-80
0
0
0 20-25
0
Z
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CBC BS%
Ac PH P-I K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-I
Mn-Al(1)
Mn-Al(2)
Zn-/ Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1 NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.36 1.30
7.3 84.0
1.2 6.3 452 94
56.0
21.0
52
34
41
2101 2101
290
20
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Me Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
00004
Is(Crop: Small Grains
.8T
80-100
0
0
0 15-20
0
0
.0 0
3
2nd Crop: Berm Ilay/Pas,E
0
60-80
0
0
0 15-20
0
0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CBC BS%
Ac PH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-Al(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1 Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1 NO3-N
AWN
Na
MIN o.46 1.20
6.7 84.0
1.1 6.2 207 150
51.0
22.0
44
29
36
754 754
131
21
0.1
North Carolina Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
�" Ttlll Thank you jor using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture
Tobacco Trust Fund Commission

Is your R T t �•complsted on the reverse side?
ti ?+ N to • • • • : • fA
r Co a p $FB3 @�P� QQQto
k O p 2 �Di5'3634S2C
00
DA
eo � a
e
m v p 0 p
c et �P
m 0 3m 3
m m m
r O
3 an Z m m N Ne@ r
yi ,�-. ❑ ❑ m �.
o
c 33^
3 ❑ ❑ o o m amm
N C m J m
Thank you for using Return Receipt Service.
IJ
a
Z 312 636 709 W '�
US Postal Service
Receipt for Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided.
uo not use for international mall rbee reverse
Sent +
Street umber
1
J
POTWI, ,8 IPc,
Postage
$
Celled Fee
Spedal Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
m Receipt
WhoDate
Whom 8 Oero Delivered
O
F Reropt Slnwiq't4M1m1
ReWmldt
S.
Date,B
i TOTAL Pl v
1
1 Posbnadr ooD leiQJ1r

AVIV
/ve
Z�3�9
17-17
� ��[ iFc�rz ��o�ia✓ � c�o.�
ZS%S
2�4r�:�+Sgr15
COASTAL CAROLINA' AREA'
til!C �83 .:� L'
- _s
11F �IIIF!11i'!i'��Ftlllllil�l�lllil�l�i!lF ��iittf!'1!11 ��!11 f�

NARRATIVE: Use this section to describe the methods) that will be used to lower the sludge
depth. If microbe use is planned, specify the product to be used. /
zr:awo of ,%��EN �2 ile �
6371
IZC
Z �c�CF/vf ,ju�2�r� . �u/I/lfir7'2®� %S lr►s
All J
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached
Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and
correct.
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
• _�r (signature)
Phone:
Date: —zo 'o S
Return this form to:
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
SPOA 10-18-04 Page 2 of 2

Plan Amendment to Include S&WCC Chronic Rainfall Practices and Standards through March 31, 2000
1. If this facility can comply with its existing permit and, CAWMP it must do so.
-- - ^ -
- - 2. Temporary Addition of New Spraytidds j�(Chi:ck appropriate boxes)
0 A. acres of cropland. List crop types used:
0 B. acres of hardwood woodland @ 100 lbs PAN / acre added.
0 C. acres of pine woodland added Qa 60 lbs PAN / acre added.
3. Summer Perennial Grass (Check appropriate box.)
0 A. Application window extended for acres of perennial grass until first killing frost
0 B. An additional 50 lbs of PAN applied to acres of perennial grass prior to killing frost.
4. PAN Application Increased for Small Grains & Winter Grasses to be harvested. (Check appropriate box.)
0 �,, PAN application increased up to 200 lbs per acre for acres of small grains or winter grasses to be harvested.
{3'B. PAN application increased up to 150 lbs per acre fom . 3 acres of overseeded summer perennial included in 3. B.
5. Wayc'Analysis (Check appropriate box.)
HA. or to December 10, 1999 the calculation of PAN will be based on a 35% reduction of the last analysis taken
prior to the fust 25 year 24 hour storm event (Current waste analysis must be used after Dec.1 ° .)
0 B. Use current waste analysis to determine PAN.
6. Required - Maximum Nitrogen Utilization Measures for Small Grains and Winter Grasses.
A. Use of higher seeding rates,
B. Timely harvest of forage to increase yield, and
C. Irrigating during periods of warmer weather.
7. Required - Irrigation Management Techniques to Reduce Runoff and Ponding Potential.
A.. Making frequent, light irrigation applications, and
B. Not irrigating immediately before predicted rainfall.
8. The owner / manager is required to manage the movement of animals to and from the facility to minimize environmental
impacts, ensure compliance with the facility's permit and amended CAWMP, and avoid discharge to surface waters.
9. Authorization to use the additional practices included in this amendment expires if a facility discharges to surface waters.
Any discharge is a violation and may result in an enforcement action.
10. The owner / operator is required to keep records of all waste applications.
11. This revision must include a map or sketch of new land application areas.
Facility Number-3 f _
Facility Owner / Manager Name (PRINT)
'Facility Owner / Manager Signature
Date___4 ZV
Faciliry Name
'i'his document must be filed at the SWCD office and be attached to the facilities CAWMP
and be available for inspection at the facility.
N New temporary sprayfields must meet applicable buffer and setback requirements. Waste must not be applied to wetlands.
11/10/1999

31-182 Tim Nethercutt (Carroll's)
Subject: 31-182 Tim Nethercutt (Carroll's)
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:32:55 -0400
From: Dean Hunkele <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC Division of Water Quality
To: Kraig Westerbeek <[e-mail]>
CC: Stonewall Mathis <[e-mail]>
Kraig,
This farm just got his Pended letter for Wetted Acres. His system needs
to be evaluated for adequacy. He purchased farm last August or so. OHis
fields are hurting and he has 1 hydrant to feed 2 small fields that is
in the middle of a 1-2 acre wetland between them. The previous owner
was supposedly busted by the Corp for clearing the wetland area and
forced not to use it. He still uses the hydrant with a berm built up
around it and it is standing in 2 feet of water/waste most of the time
which is not good for stability. He has another field with 1 hydrant
that may work OK for his purposes.
We want to see that hydrant in the wetland taken out of service or
removed. He is looking at perhaps putting in a mini -gun system or
supplementing the hydrant system with them. I told him to touch base
with you about helping him out on replacement of the wetland hydrant and
a design or any other additions. Also, he has been using a flow rate of
165 gpm I think with a 10 hp electric pump and a reel. I thought this
seemed a little too high and asked him to touch base about this as
well. He was sitting at less than 24" in his 2 lagoons, but the markers
were totally inadequate so I guessed 23", I asked him to address this as
well.
He works for Carroll's and can be reached at 910-296-1685 (H) 293-3434
or 3430 (W) if he hasn't already touched base with you.
Questions, let me know.
Dean
Dean Hunkele <[e-mail]>
Environmental Specialist 11
NC Division of Water Quality
DENR -- Wilmington Regional Office
1 of 1 6/29/2001 1:40 PM

Re: 31-182 Tim Nethercutt (Car oll's)
Subject: Re: 31-182 Tim Nethercutt (Carroll's)
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:38:24 -0400
From: [e-mail]
To: Dean Hunkele <[e-mail]
CC: Stonewall Mathis <[e-mail]>
I have forwarded this to Howard Hobson for follow up. Thanks. KW.
1 of 1 6/29/2001 1:42 PM

State of North Carolina
Department of Environs
and Natural Resources
JUN 12 2001
Michael F. Easley, Governol3'
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 4, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ivey T. Nethercutt
Limestone Creek Farm
PO Box 702
Kenansville NC 28349
1�
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Limestone Creek Farm
Facility Number 31-182
Duplin County
Dear Ivey T. Nethercutt:
A letter dated January 15, 1999 was sent to advise you about concerns associated with Certified Animal
Waste Management Plans and the method by which the irrigated acres within the plans were calculated. Only
the acres that are wetted can be credited in the waste management plan as receiving waste application. Any
acreage within the plan that can not be reached by waste application equipment can not be used as part of your
plan.
An evaluation by Brian Wrenn on 5/25/99 was made to review the actual number of acres at your facility
that receive animal waste during land application. The evaluation of your facility has yielded one of the
following two results as indicated by the box marked with an "X".
Category 1:
The evaluation of your facility could not be completed due to a lack of information. Please
contact your Technical Specialist to assist in providing Stoney Mathis the necessary
information to potentially exempt your facility from undergoing a complete wettable acre
determination. Please submit this information to Stoney Mathis, at 127 Cardinal Drive
Extension, Wilmington, NC 28405-3845, within in 90 days of the receipt of this letter. If you
have any questions please contact Stoney Mathis at [phone]. If within 90 days you
are unable to provide Stoney Mathis with the information you are automatically
required to complete a Wettable Acre Determination as described by Category 2
below, within 180 days of receipt of this letter.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Notification for Wettable Acre Determination .
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Category 2:
❑ Your facility has been identified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
as a facility that may have overestimated the number of acres actually receiving animal
waste. Therefore, some or all of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates
set in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated Technical Specialist to have him
or her conduct a Wettable Acre Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must
be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to conduct
Wettable Acre Detenninations. Many Technical Specialist with the N.C. Cooperative Extension
Service, the Soil and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and the Division of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System must be made and
the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be returned to DWO within the next
180 days. If the needed modifications are not made and if the form is not returned within the
required time, DWQ will be forced to take appropriate enforcement actions to bring this facility
into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty assessments, permit revocation,
and/or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of the attached Wettable
Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the address listed on the form. Please
note that both the owner and the Technical Specialist must sign the certification. A copy of all
the Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste Utilization Plan
must be kept at your facility. DWQ and the Division of Soil & Water Conservation Staff will
review all documentation during their annual visit of your facility. An additional copy must by
kept on file at the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office. Please note that if you install
or modify your irrigation system, a designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer
must also sign the Wettable Acre Determination Certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sonya Avant of our
Central Office staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Carroll's Foods, Inc.

State of North Carolina RECT1VE
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources OC 1 2 5 1000
Division of Water Quality IT-71 _V.
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
October 23, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
Kenneth Bostic
Kenneth Bostic Farm
PO Box 831
Beulaville NC 28518
Farm Number: 31-182
Dear Kenneth Bostic:
li
� _� •AA
IV
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Kenneth Bostic Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the
attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular
Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Theresa Nartea at [phone] extension 375 or
Stoney Matthis with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
,j.
7% `:Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Wilmington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

iA.
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATIONIPLAN
S. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste applicationmethod shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, ;you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same. I
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from you --
waste management facility. In some cases you may.want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiv ng waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis1content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out,imeets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
3552 pigs x .40 tons waste/pigs/year = 1420I.8 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
3552 pigs x .48 lbs PAN/pigs/year = 1704.96 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big;job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for was tie application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface iapplication.
Page: 2

i
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATIONIPLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESZD.
APPLIC
METH
225
N
TIME
5817
P1
MKA
BH
4.5.1
2.29
515.25
I
+MAR-
CT15
5817
-P1
SG
1
50
2.29
114.5
I
+SEP-
PR
5817
P2
LUA
BH
4.5'I
225
0.71
159.75
I
1
+MAR-
CT15
5817
-P2
SG
1
50
0.71
35.5
I
+SEP-
PR
5817
P3
LUA
BH
4.5
225
1.26
283.5
I
1
+MAR-
CT15
5817
-P3
SG
1
50
1.26
63
Z
+SEP-
PR
�I
5817
P4
MCC
BH
6.0
300
1.99
597
Z
1
+MA--R-
CT15
5817
-P4
SG
1
50
99
99.5
Z
+SEP-
PR
i
END
I
lTOTAL11868
Page:

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
- - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals folloly summer annuals.
+ - Dates shown reflect optimum uptake periods for nutrients. Waste
appilcation may begin up to thirty(30) days prior cc planting or
green -up of forages, and extend past optimum dates shown if
plant growth, pumping conditions, and PAN loading rates permit.
1.
dOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North!Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILI
1' _ Z
TRACT
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED
(Agreement with adjacent landowners
(Required only if operator does not
See required specificat
SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP
DETERMINING PHASE CODE
APPLY
METH
END
Indicates that this field is being over§
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
Dates shown reflect optimum uptake peric
application may begin up to thirty(30)1
green -up of forages, and extend past of
plant growth, pumping conditions, and F,
In interplanted fields (i.e. small g
in bermudagrass), forage must be rem
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, p
when they reach a height of six toj
should be removed when plants are graz
inches. In fields where small grain, -
for hay or silage, care should be exec
grain to reach maturity, especially la
April or May). Shading may result i
high and this will definitely inte
bermudagrass. This loss of stand u
yields and less nitrogen being uti
cutting small grain for hay or silage
is the normal situation, you are encou
grain earlier. You may want to cons
silage two to three times during ti
time small grain is plantec
The ideal time to interplant small g
September or early October. Drilli
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should
height of about two inches before dri
OR LONG
TERM LEASE
st be attached.)
n adequate
land.
2.)
LBS
COMM N
**
AW N
PER
ACRES
PER AC
AC
or
RESID.
N
TOTAL
AW N
USED
APPLIC
TIME
ded (i.e. interplanted) or
for nutrients. Waste
s prior to planting or
um dates shown if
loading rates permit.
Sin, etc, interseeded
ied through grazing,
ants should be grazed
nine inches. Cattle
d to a height of four
etc, is to be removed
ised not to let small
in the season (i.e.
small grain gets too
fere with stand of
11 result in reduced
ized. Rather than
ust before heading as
aged to cut the small
der harvesting hav or
season, depending on
in the fall.
in, etc, is late
is recommended over
grazed or mowed to a
ing for best results.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATIONIPLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals!total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
II
The following legend explains the crop codes ;used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CODE I CROP I UNITS
BH HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY I I TONS 50
SG SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED AC 50
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
I
WETTABLE LBS AW N U
_ACRES
TABLE 1 6.25 1868
TABLE 2 0 0
TOTAL 6.25 1866
*** BALANCE-163.04
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to; 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATIONI PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal tq 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables!a!re considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limtlations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization
application of sludge
rich and will require
of nutrients or other
approximately 269.952
sludge.
plan must contain prov
at agronomic rates. T
precautionary measures
elements. Your produc
pounds of plant availa
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you w:1
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply,
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 poundE
will need 4.4992 acres of land. If you apply
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, :�
of land. Please be aware that these are only
land needed. Actual requirements could vary t
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic }
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not e
soil at the time of irrigation such that run
rate is limited by initial soil moisture con
texture, water droplet size, and organic sot
should not exceed the available water holdin
time of irrigation nor should the plant avai
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
for the utilization of
.ons for periodic land
sludge will be nutrient
> prevent over application
>n facility will produce
nitrogen per year in the
.1 have approximately 1349.76
:his PAN to hybrid
of nitrogen per acre, you
he sludge to corn at
>u will need 10.79808 acres
estimates of the PAN and
25s depending on your
.elds, and application
!ed the intake rate of the
or ponding occurs. This
it, soil structure, soil
The application amount
:apacity of the soil at the
)le nitrogen applied exceed
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply thelrecommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide fol establishing application
rates and amounts.
I I
Tract I Field I Soil Type
I 1
5817 I P1 MKA
I
Crop
I
I BH
5817
I 22 I LUA
I BH
5817
I I
I
I BH
I P3 I LUA
5817
I I
I
I P4 I MCC
I BH
I
5817
I I
I -P1 I
SG
5817
I I
-P2 I
I
I SG
I
5817
I I
I -P3 I
I SG
I
5817
I I
-P4 I
11
Sr,
I
'.
IAppliation RatelApplic. Amount
I (in/hr) i (inches)
I 51 I -.0
I .50 I *1.0
I .50I *1.0
I I
.50 I *1.0
I � I
I
i I I
•5! *1
I I
I .5I I *1
* This is the maximum application amountjallowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowedlfor the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
application amount shown can be applied
conditions.
i
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of
the temporary storage must be removed on the
6.00 months. In no instance should the volui
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 h,
foot of freeboard except in the event of the';
under optimum soil
temporary storage and
average of once every
ie of the waste be stored
>ur storm storage or one
25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer andlwaste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 111and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid. ;)
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
'HIS WUP IS WRITTEN BASED ON A WETTED ACRES FOOTPRINT COMPLETED BY BILLY
IOUSTON OF DUPLIN SOIL AND WATER(SEE ATTACHED). !1
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the de
producer either owns or has an agreeme
land on which to properly apply the wa
not own adequate land to properly disp
provide a copy of an agreement with a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her
waste application. It is the responsi
facility to secure an update of the Wa
there is a change in the operation, in
animals, method of utilization, or ava
gn folder that the
for use of adequate
e. If the producer does
e of waste, he/she shall
ndowner who is within a
he use of the land for
lity of the owner of the
e Utilization Plan when
ease in the number of
able land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet;lbut not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land',eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filler Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting thejwaste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not belapplied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied onlacres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporatedlon conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation ltilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone tolflooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies. 11
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on acti ely growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered kith waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered. II
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION
PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATI
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied�i
spring planted crops on soils with a lai
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates
held to a minimum and a suitable winter
take up released nutrients. Waste shal
than 30 days prior to planting of theic
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or a
comply with the following: The outer
onto which waste is applied from a la
a swine farm shall be at least 50 fee
property boundary and from any perenn
than an irrigation ditch or canal. A
swine waste from facilities sited on
shall not be applied closer than 25 f
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied clo
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied clo
dwellings other than those owned by tt;
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner no
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged]
drainageways, or wetlands by a dischar
Animal waste may be applied to prior c
they have been approved as a land appl
"technical specialist". Animal waste[
grassed waterways that discharges dire
and on other grassed waterways, waste]
agronomic rates in a manner that cause
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate ve
established on all disturbed areas (1
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fen
protect the vegetation. Vegetation
other woody species, etc., are limite
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be
Berms and structures should be inspec
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
fall or winter for
h potential for
on these soils should be
cover crop planted to
not be applied more
op or forages breaking
r October 1, 1995 shall
rimeter of the land area
n that is a component of
rom any residential
stream or river (other
a1 waste other than
after October 1, 1995),
to perennial waters.
r than 100 feet to
r than 200 feet of
landowner.
to reach other property
to surface waters,
or by over -spraying.
verted cropland provided
ation site by a
all not be applied on
ly into water courses,
all be applied at
no runoff or drift from
own facilities,
be discharged into the
.ation will be
)on embankments, berms,
I, as necessary, to
:h as trees, shrubs, and
o areas where considered
)t mowed and accessible.
1 regularly for evidence
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION I PLAN
!l
18. If animal production at the facilitylis to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which w11 eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, ziollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site. ;1
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.;)
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary stlorage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumpingshall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the' markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum stora e volume for waste
storage ponds. ;I
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days
shall be tested at least annually at
products are applied. Nitrogen shal
element. Zinc and copper levels in
monitored and alternative crop sites
metals approach excessive levels. p
optimum crop production and maintain
analysis records shall be kept for f
waste application records shall be m
years. Waste application records fo
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in
Carolina regulations.
f utilization and soil
ro_o sites where waste
be the rate - determining
e soils shall be
hall be used when these
shall be adjusted for
. Soil and waste
e years. Poultry dry
ntained for three (3)
all other waste shall be
manner that meets North
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE
PLAN
Name of Farm:LIMESTONE CREEK FARM(31-182)
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and im
and the operation and maintenance proced
approved animal waste utilization plan f,
(we) know that any expansion to the exis
waste treatment and storage system or cc'.
facilities will require a new certificat
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
animals are stocked. I (we) also unders
discharge of animal waste from this syst
state from a storm event less severe tha
storm. The approved plan will be filed
and at the office of the local Soil and
and will be available for review by NCDW
Name o
(Please
Signat
Name o
Signature:
Da
r) .
Dat
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please p
Affiliation:DUPLIN SOIL AND WATER CONS
Phone No. 910-296-2120
Address (Agency): PO BOX 219
Signature:
KENANSVILLE NC 28349
/IV
ment the specifications
-s established in the
the farm named above. I
ig design capacity of the
.ruction of new
i to be submitted to the
(CDWQ) before the new
Ld that there must be no
to surface waters of the
he 25-year, 24-hour
site at the farm office
er Conservation District
ipon request.
)BILLY W. HOUSTON
DISTRICT
Date: I) -2C - 01
Page: 13

Hard Hose Traveling Gun
FIELD DATA WORKSHI
1. Make and model number!]/d
2. Hose length �L [feet] and hose inside/ diameter (ID
3. Gun make and model number /t/�lSo,✓ /Oi
f i
4. Gun nozzle size z [inchj, ring orifice, 1
5. Gun arc angle Z9" [degrees[ j
6. Travel lane spacing [feet]. Indicate whether
`umber of exterior hydrants . Number of inter!
7. Gun wetted diameter o?[feet]. ✓ measured or
8. Gun pressure [psi]
determined from gun charts,
*'9. Operating pressure at hose reel BO [psi]. ✓ob
prc
**10. Supply line size [inch] (from pump to last hvc
11. Supply line length L� 4fiPfeet (maximum pumping c
**12. Supply line type PVC or aluminum
*'13. Pump make and model number
"14. Pump capacity [gpmj
"15. Engine make and model number
nch] C�3M/7)1P
taper bore orifice
uniform or _ random.
hydrants
_ based on gun chart.
:rued at working gauge,
culated (show calculations)
at working gauge or
by owner.
nce)
or
16. Electric motor horsepower and rpm _� [hp] [rpml
Vote: It is strongly recommended that you field determi e wetted diameter and operating
pressure at the reel and gun.
' Locate each hydrant on a copy of the map. Indicate the sta;ri and stop of the sprinkler cart
for each travel lane and show the distance traveled. Show 6hi location of the supple line.
Irrigated acres are determined by the travel lane. j
" Optional data, furnish where possible.
*** Information furnished by
and/or
r�j� T m"t- l niG+ e,c.-if
_
Printed ame of ormer o fadlity representative Printed
Only the person or people collecting the data should
technical specialist
of technical specialist
l the Field Data Worksheet.
1
E1
t

IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling
COMPUTATIONAL V
I. Farm number (identification) ? I - 12 2 Field number (ider
2. Irrigation system designation !Existing irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes P1 # Exterior la
# Interior lanes P1 # Exterior lal
Interior lanes P 3 # Exterior la
4. Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a
I
6. Hvdrant layout ✓ Multiple hydrants — Single hydrant
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diametf
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L-) _ Interior or PI Exterior (lane/hvd
0, 35' (a) Acres start end of pull from
0,9 i (b) .Acres middle portion of pull
]Pull length^ka [feet] X w
D (c) .acres stop end of pull from
-).L-1 Total acres for travel lane length (L1) (Sum:
Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or�Exterior (lane/hydrae
U,i,f' (a) .Acres start end of pull from
(b) .-acres middle portion of pull it
[Pull length 2z9 [feet] X Vet
e (c) Acres stop end of pull from j
w/expanded irrigation system
q-5"2 feet] Length of pull(L1)
[feet] Length of pull(L2)
i 7 J [feet] Length of pull(L3)
stage of wetted diameter]
Excessively spaced hydrants
n the appropriate table and column
rCq a Column 13
width /,?s- [feet]! / 43,560
:le _ 9 v Column C
b+c)
F_ —ii � Column 13
width /e_ [feet]i / 43,560
le f�,F 7 c Column C.
G • ^ Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or j Exterior (lane/hvdranti)
C.. 5 (a) Acres start end of pull from li Table -r6c, o_ Column 6
O,ll (b) .Acres middle portion of pull (113)
(Pull length �[L [feet] X Wetfe� width /c? [feerj] / 43,560
> (c) Acres stop end of pull from jTIable Q� 9' Column e..
Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: + b + c)
I,
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irr gated aci eage for the held.
1.21 (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X # Lani ey� -acres
�• 2 (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X # Lanl: = .Acres
1 zb (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Laries = .Acres
3.1 3 Total CAW'N1P wettable acres for field (Sum: 84 + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational 6vorl5heet Completed by: _
S
S;
of technidai specialist
Date: // 1 d Of

IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm number (identification) 3 i - 1,? v Field number (ide
2. Irrigation system designation _ Existing irrigation system _
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes P f/4 # Exterior 1
# Interior lanes P46 # Exterior L
# Interior lanes PH C # Exterior 1
4. Wetted diameter 0o [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet) [as a
6. Hydrant layout _ Multiple hydrants _Single hydrant
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diame
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or ejeq Exterior (lane/hyc
1. 3! (a) Acres start end of pull from
±, (b) Acres middle portion of pull
(Pull length /N (feet( X W
(c) .Acres stop end of pull from
Wexpanded irrigation system
/06 feet) Length of pull(L1)
d_S [feet) Length of pull(L2)
iJ [feet] Length of pull(L3)
rcentage of wetted diameter]
_ E.ecessively spaced hydrants
from the appropriate table and column
Table r%9J Column 13
:ed width 1-,P-- [feet]! / 43,560
Table EE 1 J Column e
• ? A Total acres for travel lane length (L1) (Sum:"a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, _ Interior orExterior (lane/hydrant)
D, r i (a) .Acres start end of pull from j Table Cc--?O Column
1 i (b) Acres middle portion of pull ((L2)
(full length / bL (feet] X W tied width ?j- [feetJ[ / 43,560
D (c) Acres stop end of pull from I Table F_E4 o Column a
i
6 Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L) _ Interior or Exterior (lane/hydra) t)
3; (a) .Acres start end of pull from I Table PF_ H = Column [_
3 `1 (b) .Acres middle portion of pull (13)
(Pull lengthy [feet] X Wetted width ya 4 [feet([ / 43.560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from I Table CE I Column c-
Z Total acres for travel lane length (1-3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the Inumber of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
1 (a) Acres per travel lane length (1-1) X # La I es = -acres
�F b (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X # Lanes = acres
1 + (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # La41es = _ acres
1, q rj Total CAAN NfP wettable acres for field (Sum: �a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by:
Signature of techn
S
�_ Date: l� 1c of
specialist

Wettable Acres Determination Certification
Name of Facility: G /MES�Or�� G Facility Nu ber:- %4 Z
Owner(s) Name: Phone No: k
Mailing Address: 1-�L�2, Lek %O Z -
By signing this form, the facility owner and Technical Specialist acknowledge the completion of the
Wettable Acres Determination. All necessary Wettable Acre Determination Field Data Sheets and
calculations were completed to conduct a Wettable Acre Determination. The facility's Waste
Utilization Plan has been amended as necessary to reflect actual wetted acreage. A copy of all
worksheets, calculations, and other Wettable Acres Determination documents, along with the
applicable Waste Utilization Plan and Wettable Acre Determination Certification will be filed with
the local Soil and Water Conservation District. A copy will also be kept on site with the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan. Any future modifications must be approved by a technical
specialist and filed with the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. If any
modifications to the existing irrigation system or any new irrigation equipment was required to
adequately address the waste management needs of this facility, an litigation Specialist or
Professional Engineer has certified the design and installation below.
Owner Name:__-_L
Owner Signature -
Technical Specialist
Technical Specialist
If assisted by an Irrigation Specialist or Professional Engineer please read and sign below:
Animal waste application equipment has been designed or modified to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan and according to NRCS Standards. Animal waste
application equipment has been installed according to NRCS Standards and is ready for use.
Irrigation Specialist/PE
Irrigation Specialist/PE Signature:
Submit this form to:
Attn: Sonya Avant
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
wADC - 7/99

ALmIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLA14
Producer: IVEY TIMOTHY NETHERCUTT
Location: PO BOX 702
KENANSVILLE NC 28349
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Wean to Feeder Swine
Number of Animals: 3552.00 pigs
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown
and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more
nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or
when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may
result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
3552 pigs x .40 tons waste/pigs/year = 1420.8 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
3552 pigs x .48 lbs PAN/pigs/year = 1704.96 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELDFAWN
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERM.INT_NG PgASE
CODE
PER
ACRES
AW N
AC
USED
orAPPLYRESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
5817
Pl
MKA
BH I4.5
225
2.29
515.25
I
+MAR -
OCT15
5817
-Pl
APR
5817
P2
OCT15
5817
-P2
APR
5817
P3
DCT1S
5817
-P3
APR
5817
P4
DCT15
5817
-P4
APR
SG
1
50
2.29
114.5
I
+SEP-
BH
4.5
225
0.71
159.75
i
+-MAR_
ISG
'
I50
I0.71
+SEP-
BH
4.5
225
1.26
283 5
I
I
+MAR -
SG
1
50
63
I
I1.26
+SEP-
BH
6.0
300
1.99
597
I
I
+MAR -
SG
50
1.99
99.5
I
+SEP-
YI
TOTAL11868
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
+ - Dates shown reflect optimum uptake periods for nutrients. Waste
appilcation may begin up to thirty(30) days prior to planting or
green -up of forages, and extend past optimum dates shown if
plant growth, pumping conditions, and PAN loading rates permit.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
7TRACTFIELID,
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
—
--�
L1
- - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
+ - Dates shown reflect optimum uptake periods for nutrients. Waste
application may begin up to thirty(30) days prior to planting or
green -up of forages, and extend past optimum dates shown if
plant growth, pumping conditions, and PAN loading rates permit.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
SG
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
TONS
AC
50
50
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAI,
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
WETTABLE LBS AW N USED
ACRES_
6.25 1868
0 0
6.25 1868
* BALANCE-163.04
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
I
ully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
I
ull application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 269.952 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 1349.76
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen, per acre, you
will need 4.4992 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 10.79808 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25°- depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
I I
5817
I P1
I I
5817
I P2
I I
5817
I P3
I I
5817 I
I
P4 l
1.
5817 I
I
-Pi
I-
5817 l
I
-P2
I_
5817 I
I
-P3 l
I_
5817 l
-P4 1
1_
Soil Type
l Crop
l
(Application
I (in/hr)
I
RatelApplic. Amount
I (inches)
I
MKA
i BH
1
I 5
�
I *1.0
I
LUA
I BH
I
l .50
l
I *1.0
I
LUA
I BH
I
l .50
I
! *1.0
MCC
I BH
I
I .50
I
I *1.0
I
SG
I
I .5
I
l *1
I
1 SG
I
I .5
1
I _
I
SG
I
I
I
SG
I
I .5
I
I *1
I
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for I80.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
CHIS WUP IS WRITTEN BASED ON A WETTED ACRES FOOTPRINT COMPLETED BY BILLY
?OUSTON OF DUPLIN SOIL AND WATER(SEE ATTACHED).
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
I. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level.of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. when animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. when applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No pending should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
B. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum -and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to -reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established or, all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preolant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of.
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:LIMESTONE CREEK FARM(31-182)
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility e IVEY TIMOTHY NETHERCUTT
(Please print)
Signature: Date:
Name of Manage If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)BILLY W. HOUSTON
Affiliation:DUPLIN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Phone No. 910-296-2120
Address (Agency): PO BOX 219
KENANSVILLE NC 28349
Signature: nXX / �� �JO'r Date: jj -D - D
Page: 13

for Wastewater Application Equipment
Hard of®se Traveling Garin Syst=m
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET*
1. Make and model number A &4nl
2. Hose length --i5Y4 [feet] and hose
/inside diameter (ID) Z•& (inch]
3. Gun make and model number /OU
I
4. Gun nozzle size i [inch], ring orifice, / taper bore orifice
5. Gun arc angle Z54a [degrees]
6. Travel lane spacing [feet]. Indicate whether _ uniform or _ random.
Number of exterior hydrants . Number of interior hydrants
7. Gun wetted diameter a <!5 [feet]. measured or _ based on gun chart.
8. Gun pressure _�'o[psi] r/ observed at working gauge,
determined from gun charts, calculated (show calculations)
**9. Operating pressure at hose reel 90 [psi]. ✓observed at working gauge or
„ _ provided by owner.
**10. Supply line size [inch] (from pump to last hydrant)
**11. Supply line lengthOIn eet (maximum pumping distance)
**12. Supply line type '� PVC or aluminum
13. Pump make and model number
**14. Pump capacity [gpm]
*`15. Engine make and model number
or
**16. Electric motor horsepower and rpm [hp] [rpm]
Note: It is strongly.recommended that you field determine wetted diameter and operating
pressure at the reel and gun.
Locate each hydrant on a copy of the map. Indicate the start and stop of the sprinkler cart
for each travel lane and show the distance traveled. Show the location of the supply line.
Irrigated acres are determined by the travel lane.
Optional data, furnish where possible.
*** Information furnished by
and/or
liepesentatie a4ofow,ty r vsignature of technical specialist
aV�rlY /Y tT %rClr vTr
Prir.;ed ame of osner o facility representative Printed name of technical specialist
*** Only the person or people collecting the data should sign the Field Data bVorksheet.
D
i
E
1

_..._ ....., nHHu HUSt IRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
I. Farm number (identification) Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation _✓Existing irrigation system _ New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes A # Exterior lanes 4-5-2 feet] Length of pull(LI)
_ # Interior lanes )- # Exterior lanes 21-c_ [feet] Length of pull(L2)
_ # interior lanes P13 # Exterior lanes 1_-,__ [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter 0 ) (feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing _ Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout ✓ ivlultiple hydrants _ Single hydrant _ E.ecessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L) _ Interior or Pf Exterior (lane/hydrant)
�- �Ti (a) Acres start end of pull from Table CCq r. Column
0A 11 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (LI)
(Pull length ^dam fleet] X Wetted width �Pi [feet)) / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table - C q o Column C
1.1) Total acres for travel lane length (Ll) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L) _ Interior or�Extenor (lane/hydrant)
(� (a) Acres start end of pull from Table F_ : f o Column
P.a 3 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (1-2)
(Pull length jlM (feet] X Wetted width /_ [feet]l / 43,560
V (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table 9C q o Column C
-On Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L) _ Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
0.. 5' (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Fr-i o Column
0.4f (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3)
)lull length1-2,Ll- [feet] X Wetted width %J [feet]( / 43,560
0_ (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table CC q Column c.
1.2 b Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
S. Muliipiy the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
J..211 (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X # Lanes = Acres
0 • 1 (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X # Lanes = Acres
(c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres
3,Z 9 Total CAUNfP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: _ � �.,� 1v �,,,/,
�—� Date: %/ 10JI
Signature of technical specialist
S`

HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
I. Fartri number (identification) .? i - I Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation _ Existing irrigation system _ New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes _ # Interior lanes PYt/+ # Exterior lanes 106 feet] Length of pull(LI)
# Interior lanes P46 # Exterior lanes d__ [feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior lanes Fq C # Exterior lanes qS [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter 100 [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing Hydrant spacingfeet
[ ) (as a percentage of wetted diameter)
6. Hydrant layout _ Multiple hydrants _ Single hydrant _
7. Read the irrigated areants
a per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the sappropriateively ptableandcolumn
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L, Interior or W Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table f_1_ q o Column
S•�4• (b) Acres middle portion of pull (LI)
IN'll length 116Z [feet] X Wetted width /Y-' [feet]; / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table f i J Column C
i Total acres for travel lane length (L1) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L) _ Interior or NOEsterior (lane/hydrant)
0. i i (a) Acres start end of pull (Tom Table )i: Column
VI (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2)
[Pull length_ /(� [feet] X Wetted width Gi- [feet]I / 43,560
(c) Aces stop end of pull from Table FE9 c Column
Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L
_ Interior orC'KExterior (lane/hydrant)
LI (a) Acres start end of pull from Table f— o Column
3 11 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (0)
(pull length etj [feet] X Wetted width _Jei [feet]] / 43,560
0 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table E `! L Column C.
Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Slim: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
, 9 '1 (a) Acres per travel lane length (LI) X #Lanes
.� (b) Acres per travel lane length L2 X --Acres
length(L2) # Lanes =Acres
(c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes
Acres
cf 1 Total CAUTNIT wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by:
Date: // 2c o)
Signature or technical specialist

IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT FIELD CALIBRATION FORM
LOCATION: UMLC5970A/'E 31—/$2—
DATE of FIELD CALIBRATION: Z q- / 4
— (mm/dd/YYYY)
FLOW METER SERIAL NUMBER:
EQIPi`4ENT NUMBER: A .4 ph s-_. 2_1
MEASURED RING SIZE: l2 tr_7d�{ 730t, No-z7a l-<
PRESSURE GAUGE READINGS: At Pump:
At Traveler: 10.0
At Sprinkler/Gun: _ 7 S
EXPECTED FLOW RATE (from manufacture chart): _ ILd=
MEASURED FLOW RATE (from flow meter):
flow rate variance greater than 10%? Yes No
EXPECTED WETTED DIAMETER (from wetted acres determination):
MEASURED WETTED DIAMETER: 113 O ft.
wetted diameter variance greater than 15%? Yes No
**** IF YES IS ANSWERED TO EITHER FLOW RATE OR WETTED DIAMETER
VARIANCE, CONTRACT AN IRRIGATION SPECIALIST FOR ASSISTANCE.
_ psi
_ psi
_ psi
GPM
GPM
ft.
COMMENTS: WE,A71f�_X— CON ), r 71 0" C
c54-N� t—�107, l-LDitib _ E571 p 1 CD
CALIBRATOR: c'
(signature)

Waters Agricultural Laboratories, Inc.
s 364 West Park Drive Warsaw, NC 28398 257 Newton Hwy - P.O. Box 382
[phone] FAX [phone] Camilla, Georgia 31730
[phone] FAX [phone]
TIMMY NETHERCUTT i Soil Analysis Report Grower: TIMMYNETHERCUT
1068 S DOBSON CHAPEL RD i
MAGNOLIA, NC 28453 NCDA Index Field ID: LIMESTONE CREEK
rr- -
Lab Number I Sample 1
uig� tf i �� ) s � il'' r r 5 - t H i 1 Te 2 � day '� ie ,.t '' q'C ♦ �. sf q -'r`fiV
lil {Arf( r } 5yl1} c i/it E 1> 2 li3 I 717 f)1 4 i I!' 7" r v�r fc a(X} 3
,u..._._._, �,y ........�)cs .
l� 1M7 © ® M
commendationsCrop DPasture M 11 220 1 70 20 1 I
Recommendations - Ibs.lA Lime-ions/A Q 5205 K20 ® ❑S Cu lzn
Crop BERMUDA Pasture M 0.0 220 110 0 0 0 0 0
Fertilizer recommendations are based on the philosophy and recommendations of the NCDA Agronomic Divisior
DWQ Laboratory Certification Number 635

:..late, of North Carolina
Department:of Environment
and.Natilral Resources.
Division'of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr.,,govemor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
Kenneth Bostic
Kenneth Bostic Farm
PO Box 831
Beulaville NC 28518
Farm Number: 31-182
Dear Kenneth Bostic:
October 23, 2000
:AM
NORTH .CAROUNA DEPAFr
ENVIRONMENT AND NmiimA.
RECEIVED
NOV 0 1 auau
WATER QUALI T Y SECTION
Non -Discharge Permittrg
You are hereby notified that Kenneth Bostic Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (610) days to submit the
attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular
Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application. '
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Theresa Nartea at [phone] extension 375 or
Stoney Matthis with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
f or `Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Wilmington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

I: RECE1►1
u `s ,• Sti te_of North-CaaroLna , �
Department ofJ. nvironnlent andtNatural Resoiill sQ p ,1hE
Divisioniof Water Quality . WATER QUALITY StCT1oN
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form-Dischs;; Psnr;L;pg
(THIS FORM MAYBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations
1.
2.
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 FacilityName: hlmeJ40AC Crack Far,.,
1.2 Print Land Owner's name:-Kenrtcd, Bostie Iys, ! i rh 04-h . Na-4-A', r e- vJ%
1.3 Mailing address: PO Box 63-h 70 2-
City, State: n-.. ahw4l -W Kcnansv;11e,NL. Zip: :18548- .21149
Telephone Number (include area code): 4W498-di89 910 - 296 - % 6 R 5-
1.4 County where facility is located:
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): North of Beulaville. On East side of Hwy 111, 0.5 miles
North of East Duplin Hieh School.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Carroll's Foods, Inc.
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 10/18/1994
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 31 (county number); 182 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Swine operation
Wean to Feeder
3552- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? E]yes; E:] no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Pool W No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 7n199 Page 1 of 4 31-182

y.
V
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not coveied by the application
system): 7.30 Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP):
2.4 Number o lagoo storage ponds (circle which is applicable): .Z
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NR(�Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
( YES J or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? O -
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? / b) ]P / 9 -3
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have
a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation, -
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 7n199 Page 2 of 4 31-182

F
{
3
�
t
44',N
{ 1
r
•'+F
., YtY��%
'.hr
�
3 f .( tir
1. s t
Facility Number: 31 ' 182
Facility Name: Kenneth Bostic Farm .
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: r
I, I v tv Tm o i-Al ei'r'ter c & (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for i' i m e jfon a CrPe k Far. , (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returnedAnne as incomplete. /% _ � -.
Signature
5. M
I,
J
Date
CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land (Tuner)
f12- 3p-
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 7/7/99 Page 3 of 4 31-182

-, t'a
� f
DIVLSION OF WATER QUALM REGIONAL; OFFICES (1198)
Ashton-- Regionl WQ Supevi=
59 WoodSn?]a=
Asbeville. NC 29801
(szg) 251.6M8
Fix (ezg)251$;52
Avcy
.3=
Buncombe
MuEs n
Bwk--
M:DoweIl
Caldwell
kfi:_sll
Cb=k;
Polk
Clay
Ru:'.�--fotd
G!1hzT
Swaim
Haywood
Tzsyivaaia
y=�T
U:isaa
Y=my
zyet:eviile?,egio-..i WQ Snx-rs�
'wa_bovta 3n lr_t. Sca:e 714
zyc-vii - NC =-01.
(910) 4W--15=1
= az [phone]
Anson Mole
Blai= Riti--ond
Ro'oeson
:sue Sz -son
hake Sco_za3
Mo p:m=y
�:r-c sz:=Rep.-.iWQS t
SES Wanp:tzwa S
Tv-ustnn Sa? ; NC:r107
(�b2 ii1-45DO
A'_�-m
Rocki .T
AU-Z;z;y
Rza'n` inh
Asbc
Stales
Csswmn
Scy
Davison
'Wamnp
Davie
W-L-=
Fxsyth
Yarn
Cr..lfad
Wzshing= Regiamal WQ Sm cvisor
943 Wrshimg Squirt trial
Wasbingt n. NC 27889
(;2SZJ 946-6:81
Fz= (z--.?; 975-3716
BGae Lmc r
0.1
Cu:rimdc
Pcqu r ss
Dare
Pia
Gals
TyMIi
cv=c
Washington
&e:dord
Wz)x
iiyd`
Mo¢-wile Regional WQ Svx=^scs
919 Norh Main Stt
Mort --Si r- NC 29115
[phone]
Fax (704) 663-�
Al==,.a-d--
Lima
Cabanas
Mesl=biny
Caxwba
Rowan
Cievet*-A
S=ay
Gaston
lisoa
Ralei6 Re70nsl WQ Smcvis.-s
39W Bait Dr.
Raldgh.' NC 27611
019) 571-4700
Fzt [phone]
rl,,Th m
Nash�.
D iham
Nor:h yy L n
E4=vmbc
Franklin
Qznge
Pasoa
Cranvile
Vac-
l3aiifaz
Wake
jmh"t at
Wz:�-
Lc
Wilson
l
Wii=ngtx Repro WQ Scxti^s-
127 Car.�`_al D=ve Z.z sion
FrFil:mimgt om. NC 28:05-5& 5
[phone]
FIX [phone]
Bz^_sir Nev F-stover
Cam- Qariow
Coiur.bus F- n-
Dun a
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/7WS Page 4 of 4

Notation of Change of Owl r_rship
Animal Waste Management Facility
(please type or print all information that dots not require a signature) _
In accordance with the requirements of 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(H)(xii) this form is official
notification to the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) of the transfer of ownership of an Animal Waste
Management Facility. This form must be submitted to DEM no later than 60 days following the transfer
of ownership.
General Information:
Name of Farm: keAAe fA 130Lr4;c FGIm Facility No: 31 - /'.z
Previous Owner(s) Name: KeAmj-� 13or t i c Phone No: q 0 19>c - 4jam,
New Owner(s)
Mailing Addres
I ULC
Fann Location: Fourteen Digit Hydrologic Unit:_03Q 3 00 o Dn 4" Oo 10
Latitude and Longitude: � ° x� q� / '�2 I County: D
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, e
etc.): ON ar+ C-" LI/VGlll / UAroxtM�m�bl / ,� /Vo f G �
G
-- " !l�
Operation Descrintion:
Type of Swine No. of Animals - Tvpe of Poultry No. of Animals Trpe of Cattle
Wean to Feeder _ 3 t". C 7- 7 Layer s Dairy
ZI Feeder to Finish D Pullets ❑ Eeef
:1 Farrow to Wean
0 Farrow to Feeder
7 Farrow to Finish Other Type of Livestock: Number of Anil
No. ofAnintals
Acreage Available for Application: Required Acreage: 6. 3
Number of Lagoons Storage Ponds : Total Capacity: �
_� p ry: J � 1,i 10 Cubic Feet (ft)
kk#kkkkk..kkkkkgkkkkkkkkkkxkkkk+kkkkkkkkkkkkk kki�.k kkkrckgk+Fkkkkkkkkkk+,c tcka+,x
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that -all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from
the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or from a storm
event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal waste. I (we)
understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical standards
developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be tiled at the farm and at the office of the
local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a technical specialist and
submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership requires written
notification to DWQ or a new certification (if the approved plan is than.-ed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of New
Signature: Al
Name of
Signatur
Owner
different from
Date:
Please sign and return this form to: N. C. Division Of Water Quality
«'ater Quality Section. Compliance Group
Raleigh, NC 37626-05 5
NCO -- \lay 3, 1996

S S_s 'YAG PLA.`7 CsaT:7:CAT:0s zca(iF.C?. _PA-=-M '==DLOTS
rlaaae rat•.:-= the ec= letad forms to the Division of ziv_ro_aatal Y•-a•�anaat at
the add=oaa oa the ravoraa side of thia fora. ^`
Ltame of fay (Please print) : �EA/A(67T/ 0Ol77C
.dd=ess> OD. 95A 8R!
$ 6rJla rt t f & zC .L /-8 Phone NO- Q92 a-4Z87 aLX
County: I
tar^ location: Latitude and Longitude;jq,a&'a///' (rruired) . Also,
Please atzacn a copy of a county road map withlocationidentified.
Tyre of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.): Su//.ya
Design Capacity (number of axti-1s) : ' .33SL
Ave=age size of operation-(12 month population avg.) _3S'3'2-
A:•e=age acreage needed for land application of waste (acres): 7.3
Tec`=.ica1 Sracialiat'Ca: -------------------------------------
As a_a=a:=ea
a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
.Corse= -ration Coc ission pursuant to 1SA NCAC 6F .0005. I Certify that the new or
expa_-ded a_.i=,a1 waste management system as installed for th*e fare nzmed. above
has an a^n_`=al waste management plan that meets the design, construction,cperation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Envircn_mental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/o= the Ncrth
Carolina Soil and Water.Conser:atioa Co=. ission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following e7 em=_nts and their corresponding mina.;=
criteria-; -._� L=en verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or
e^_ivalent far lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adec,ate
quantity and a_-:ount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party) ; access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the ecrtrol of the discarge
Of pollutants f=cm stormwate= runoff events less severe than the 25-yea=, 24- our
stor
Xa of Teci=ical Speaial'_at (Please Print) : tRf.MD L. f%83o�
Affiliation- 7f 5orrQCE /tixSE,ZdA770Yt.V_ •C'1*GQoLt-C v�D.f .�"KC
Add=ess (Agency) :f•�'J l7 QA 4/�'.0 656, ��L�6f�,435aW .['. Phone Nc-_4/a 023
Signature: �OL<%� S� - - - - - Date: io LB��i'SL
a==cv=aaaaccaacaaaeaa aaaaeeass..aaaaaaaaaava.asaaaaaaev==ac:=caaaca=aa
T- (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved ani.-.al waste management plan for the farm named above and will i.ple_ment
these procedures. I (we) know that any additional expansion^i to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
EnvirorLmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a stor= event less severe than the 2S-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil. and
Water Conservation District.
j�tia=a of Lard or_a=
(Please Print)_: F /i it ��GS SIC
1KSignatu=e: i'�2t-:.�,o�/r� ��'� YDate: /L•_/�' `75=
of Xa-.^.aver, if different fro= owner (Please print) :
Signature- Date:
vote: A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division^. of
Enviror-^rental Management within 60 days of a title transfer.
Dom: USE ONLY:AC.Y`,+#

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE PLAN
Proper lagoon liquid management should be a year-round priority. It is especially
important to manage levels so that you do not have problems during extended rainy and
wet periods.
Maximum storage capacity should be available in the lagoon for periods when the
receiving crop is dormant (such as wintertime for bermudagrass) or when there are
extended rainy spells such as the thunderstorm season in the summertime. This means
that at the first signs of plant growth in the later winter/early spring, irrigation according to
a farm waste management plan should be done whenever the land is dry enough to
receive lagoon liquid. This will make storage space available in the lagoon for future wet
periods. In the late summer/early fall the lagoon should be pumped down to the low
marker (see Figure 2-1) to allow for winter storage. Every effort should be made to
maintain the lagoon close to the minimum liquid level as long as the weather and waste
utilization plan will allow it.
Waiting until the lagoon has reached its maximum storage capacity before starting to
irrigate does not leave room for storing excess water during extended wet periods.
Overflow from the lagoon for any reason except a 25-year, 24-hour storm is a violation of
state law and subject to penalty action.
The routine maintenance of a lagoon involves the following:
Maintenance of a vegetative cover for the dam.
Fescue or common bermudagrass are the most common vegetative
covers. The vegetation should be fertilized each year, if needed, to
maintain a vigorous stand. The amount of fertilizer applied should be
based on a soils test, but in the event that it is not practical to obtain
a soils test each year, the lagoon embankment and surrounding areas
should be fertilized with 800 pounds per acre of 10-10-10, or
equivalent.
Brush and trees on the embankment must be controlled. This may be
done by mowing, spraying, grazing, chopping, or a combination of
these practices. This should be done at least once a year and
possibly twice in years that weather conditions are favorable for
heavy vegetative growth.
NOTE: If vegetation is controlled by spraying, the herbicide must not be allowed to enter
the lagoon water. Such chemicals could harm the bacteria in the lagoon that are treating
the waste.
Maintenance inspections of the entire lagoon should be made during the initial filling of
the lagoon and at least monthly and after major rainfall and storm events. Items to be
checked should include, as a minimum, the following:
Waste Inlet Pipes, Recycling Pipes, and Overflow Pipes ---look for:
1. separation of joints
2. cracks or breaks
3. accumulation of salts or minerals
4. overall condition of pipes

Lagoon surface ---look for:
1. undesirable vegetative growth
2. floating or lodged debris
Embankment ---look for:
1. settlement, cracking, or "jug" holes
2. side slope stability ---slumps or bulges
3. wet or damp areas on the back slope
4. erosion due to lack of vegetation or as a result of wave action
5. rodent damage
Larger lagoons may be subject to liner damage due to wave action caused by strong
winds. These waves can erode the lagoon sidewalls, thereby weakening the lagoon dam.
A good stand of vegetation will reduce the potential damage caused by wave action. If
wave action causes serious damage to a lagoon sidewall, baffles in the lagoon may be
used to reduce the wave impacts.
Any of these features could lead to erosion and weakening of the dam. If your lagoon has
any of these features, you should call an appropriate expert familiar with design and
construction of waste lagoons. You may need to provide a temporary fix if there is a threat
of a waste discharge. However, a permanent solution should be reviewed by the
technical expert. Any digging into a lagoon dam with heavy equipment is a serious
undertaking with potentially serious consequences and should not be conducted unless
recommended by an appropriate technical expert.
Transfer Pumps ---check for proper operation of:
1. recycling pumps
2. irrigation pumps
Check for leaks, loose fittings, and overall pump operation. An unusually loud or grinding
noise, or a large amount of.vibration, may indicate that the pump is in need or repair or
replacement.
NOTE: Pumping systems should be inspected and operated frequently enough so that you
are not completely "surprised" by equipment failure. You should perform your pumping
system maintenance at a time when your lagoon is at its low level. This will allow some
safety time should major repairs be required. Having a nearly full lagoon is not the time
to think about switching, repairing , or borrowing pumps. Probably, if your lagoon is full,
your neighbor's lagoon is full also. You should consider maintaining an inventory of spare
parts or pumps.
Surface water diversion features are designed to carry all surface
drainage waters (such as rainfall runoff, roof drainage, gutter outlets,
and parking lot runoff) away from your lagoon and other waste
treatment or storage structures. The only water that should be
coming from your lagoon is that which comes from your flushing
(washing) system pipes and the rainfall that hits the lagoon directly.
You should inspect your diversion system for the following:
1. adequate vegetation
2. diversion capacity
3. ridge berm height

Identified problems should be corrected promptly. It is advisable to inspect your system
during or immediately following a heavy rain. If technical assistance is needed to
determine proper solutions, consult with appropriate experts.
You should record the level of the lagoon just prior to when rain is predicted, and then
record the level again 4 to 6 hours after the rain (assumes there is no pumping). This will
give you an idea of how much your lagoon level will rise with a certain rainfall amount
(you must also be recording your rainfall for this to work). Knowing this should help in
planning irrigation applications and storage. If your lagoon rises excessively, you may
have an inflow problem from a surface water diversion or there may be seepage into the
lagoon from the surrounding land.
Lagoon Operation
Startup:
Immediately after construction establish a complete sod cover on bare soil
surfaces to avoid erosion.
2. Fill new lagoon design treatment volume at least half full of water before
waste loading begins, taking care not to erode lining or bank slopes.
Drainpipes into the lagoon should have a flexible pipe extender on the
end of the pipe to discharge near the bottom of the lagoon during initial
filling or another means of slowing the incoming water to avoid erosion of
the lining.
When possible, begin loading new lagoons in the spring to maximize
bacterial establishment (due to warmer weather).
It is recommended that a new lagoon be seeded with sludge from a healthy
working swine lagoon in the amount of 0.25 percent of the full lagoon
liquid volume. This seeding should occour at least two weeks prior to the
addition of wastewater.
6. Maintain a periodic check on the lagoon liquid pH. If the pH falls below
7.0, add agricultural lime at the rate of 1 pound per 1000 cubic feet of
lagoon liquid volume until the pH rises above 7.0. Optimum lagoon liquid
pH is between 7.5 and 8.0.
7. A dark color, lack of bubbling, and excessive odor signals inadequate
biological activity. Consultation with a technical specialist is recommended
if these conditions occur for prolonged periods, especially during the warm
season.
Loading:
The more frequently and regularly that wastewater is added to a lagoon, the better the
lagoon will function. Flush systems that wash waste into the lagoon several times daily are
optimum for treatment. Pit recharge systems, in which one or more buildings are drained
and recharged each day, also work well.

Management:
Practice water conservation ---minimize building water usage and
spillage from leaking waterers, broken pipes and washdown through
proper maintenance and water conservation.
Minimize feed wastage and spillage by keeping feeders adjusted. This
will reduce the amount of solids entering the lagoon
Maintain lagoon liquid level between the permanent storage level and
the full temporary storage level.
Place visible markers or stakes on the lagoon bank to show the
minimum liquid level and the maximum liquid lever (Figure 2-1).
Start irrigating at the earliest possible date in the spring based on
nutrient requirements and soil moisture so that temporary storage
will be maximized for the summer thunderstorm season. Similarly,
irrigate in the late summer/early fall to provide maximum lagoon
storage for the winter.
The lagoon liquid level should never be closer than 1 foot to the lowest
point of the dam or embankment.
Do not pump the lagoon liquid level lower that the permanent storage
level unless you are removing sludge.
Locate float pump intakes approximately 18 inches underneath the liquid
surface and as far away from the drainpipe inlets as possible.
Prevent additions of bedding materials, long-stemmed forage or vegetation,
molded feed, plastic syringes, or other foreign materials into the lagoon.
Frequently remove solids from catch basins at end of confinement houses or
wherever they are installed.
Maintain strict vegetation, rodent, and varmint control near lagoon edges.
Do not allow trees or large bushes to grow on lagoon dam or embankment.
Remove sludge from the lagoon either when the sludge storage capacity is
full or before it fills 50 percent of the permanent storage volume.
If animal production is to be terminated, the owner is responsible for
obtaining and implementing a closure plan to eliminate the possibility of a
pollutant discharge.
Sludge Removal:
Rate of lagoon sludge buildup can be reduced by:

proper lagoon sizing,
mechanical solids separation of flushed waste,
gravity settling of flushed waste solids in an appropriately designed basin, or
minimizing feed wastage and spillage.
Lagoon sludge that is removed annually rather than stored long term will:
have more nutrients,
have more odor, and
require more land to properly use the nutrients.
Removal techniques:
Hire a custom applicator.
Mix the sludge and lagoon liquid with a chopper -agitator impeller
pump through large -bore sprinkler irrigation system onto nearby cropland;
and soil incorporate.
Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland or
forageland; mix remaining sludge; pump into liquid sludge applicator; haul
and spread onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.
Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland or
forageland; dredge sludge from lagoon with dragline or sludge barge; berm
an area beside lagoon to receive the sludge so that liquids can drain back
into lagoon; allow sludge to dewater; haul and spread with manure spreader
onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.
Regardless of the method, you must have the sludge material analyzed for waste
constituents just as you would your lagoon water. The sludge will contain different
nutrient and metal values from the liquid. The application of the sludge to fields will be
limited by these nutrients as well as any previous waste applications to that field and crop
requirement. Waste application rates will be discussed in detail in Chapter 3.
When removing sludge, you must also pay attention to the liner to prevent damage. Close
attention by the pumper or drag -line operator will ensure that the lagoon liner remains
intact. If you see soil material or the synthetic liner material being disturbed, you should
stop the activity immediately and not resume until you are sure that the sludge can be
removed without liner injury. If the liner is damaged it must be repaired as soon as
possible.
Sludge removed from the lagoon has a much higher phosphorus and heavy metal content
than liquid. Because of this it should probably be applied to land with low phosphorus
and metal levels, as indicated by a soil test, and incorporated to reduce the chance of
erosion. Note that if the sludge is applied to fields with very high soil -test phosphores, it
should be applied only at rates equal to the crop removal of phosphorus. As with other
wastes, always have your lagoon sludge analyzed for its nutrient value.
The application of sludge will increase the amount of odor at the waste application site.
Extra precaution should be used to observe the wind direction and other conditions which
could increase the concern of neighbors.

Possible Causes of Lagoon Failure
Lagoon failures result in the unplanned discharge of wastewater from the structure. Types
of failures include leakage through the bottom or sides, overtopping, and breach of the
dam. Assuming proper design and construction, the owner has the responsibility for
ensuring structure safety. Items which may lead to lagoon failures include:
Modification of the lagoon structure ---an example is the placement of a pipe
in the dam without proper design and construction. (Consult an expert in
lagoon design before placing any pipes in dams.)
Lagoon liquid levels ---high levels are a safety risk.
Failure to inspect and maintain the dam.
Excess surface water flowing into the lagoon.
Liner integrity ---protect from inlet pipe scouring, damage during sludge
removal, or rupture from lowering lagoon liquid level below groundwater
table.
NOTE: If lagoon water is allowed to overtop the dam, the moving water will soon cause
gullies to form in the dam. Once this damage starts, it can quickly cause a large discharge
of wastewater and possible dam failure.

SWINE FARM WASTE MANAGEMENT ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST
Source Cause BMP's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead Swine production l­)�Wgetative or wooded buffers;
(commended best management
practices;
[ood iudoment and common sense
Animal body surfaces Dirty manure -covered animals (y-ory floors
Floor surfaces Wet manure -covered floors ( 1 Slotted floors;
(44Vaterers located over slotted floors;
1 1 Feeders at high and of solid floors;
1 1 Sccrr pe manure buildup from floors;
IWnderfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits
Urine
(Lliimquent manure removal by flush,pit ,
rre/echarge,or scrape
Parital micorbial decomposition
''
(,ytrnder'boor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fans
Volatile gases;
( a atmenance;
Dust
( fficienair movement
Indoor surfaces
Dust
( ashdown between groups of animals
1 1 Feed additives;
1 1 Feeder covers;
1 1 Feed delivery downspout extenders to
feeder covers -
Flush tanks
Agitation of recycled lagoon
(1 Flush tank covers
liquid whiles tanks are filling
1.1 Extend fill lines to near bottom of
tanks with anti -siphon vents
Flush alleys
Agitation during wastewater
( nderfloor flush with underfloor
conveyanance
ventilation
Pit recharge points
Agitation of recycled lagoon
( I Extend rechard lines to near bottom of
liquid while pits are filling
pits with anti -siphon vents
Lift stations
Agitation during sump tank filling
( 1 Sump tank covers
and drawdown
Outside drain collection
Agitation during wastewater
( 1 Box covers
or junction boxes
conveyance
End of drainpipes at lagoon
Agitation during wastewater
( xtend discharge point of pipes
underneath lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces
Volatile gas emissions
(�oper lagoon liquid capacity
Biological mixing
IyCo rect lagoon startup procedures
Agitation
(J4Mi mum surface area -to -volume ratio
inimum agitation when pumping
1 1 Mechanical aeration
'
1 1 Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler nozzles High pressure agitation _" Ulrrl6ate on dry days with little or no wind
Wind,draf[ um recommended operation pressure
\ '
( ump intake near lagoon liquid surface
• 1 1 Pump from second -stage lagoon
AMOC--November 11, 1996

Storage tank or basin Partial microbial decomposition
( I Bottom or midlevel loading
surface Mixing while filling
( I Tank covers
Agitation when emptying
( I Basin surface mats of solids
( 1 Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface Partial micobial decomposition
( ) Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
Mixing while filling
level
Agitation when emptying
( ) Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge Agitation when spreading
Hloil injection of slurry/sludges
spreader outlets Volatile gas emissions
(I Mash residual manure from spreader after use
( ) Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure, slurry Volatile gas emissions while drying
1 ) Soil infection of slurry/sludges
or sludge on field surfaces
( I Soil incorporation within 48 hours
( 1 Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
( ) Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals Carcass decomposition
( roper disposition of carcasses
Dead animal disposal Carcass decomposition
( ) Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits
pits
1 ) Proper location/construction of disposal pits
Incinerators Incomplete combustion
( I Secondary stack burners
Standing water around Improper drainage -
1 rade and landscape such that water drains
facilities Microbial decomposition of
away from facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto public Poody maintained access roads
( rm access road maintenance
roads from farm access
Additional Information:
Available From:
Swine Manure Management; 0200 Rule/BMP Packet-
NCSU-County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU-SAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge --Lagoon
Treatment; EBAE 128-88
NCSU-BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Fluse--Lagoon
Treatment; EBAE 129-88
NCSU-BAE
Lagoon Desig and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
NCSU-BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU-BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33
NCSU-Swine Extension
Environmental Assuranc Program: NPPC Manual
NC Pork Produces Assoc
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force
NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PR0107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
The issues checked ( ) pertain to this operation. The landownerintegrator agrees to use sound judgment in applying
odor control measures as practical.
I certify the aforementioned odor control Best Managme
AMOC--November 11, 1996

INSECT CONTROL CHECKLIST FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS
Source
Cause
Flush Gutters
Accumulation of solids
Lagoons and Pits
Crusted Solids
Excessive Vegetative
Growth
Decaying vegetation
Feeders
Feed Spillage .
Feed Storage
Accumulations of feed residues
Animal Holding Areas
Accumulations of animal wastes
and feed wastage
AMIC--November 11, 1996
BMP's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
(Liquid Systems)
rush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated
soil from gutters as designed.
( amove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
( I fN aKttain lagoons, settling basins and
pits where pest breeding is apparent to
minimize the crusting of solids to a depth
of no more than 6-8 inches over more than
30% of surface.
( aintain vegetative control along banks of
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
(Dry Systems)
1 1 Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the accumulation
of decaying wastage:
( ) Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g. 7-10 day
interval during summer; 15-30 day interval during winter).
( 1 Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
insuring drainage away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products).
( 1 Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed.
( 1 Eliminate low area that trap moisture along fences
and other locations where waste accumulates and
and disturbance by animals is minimal.
( 1 Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e. inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids as needed).

Dry Manure Handling Accumulations of animal wastes (1 Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g. 7-10 day
Systems interval during summer; 1S-30 days interval during
winter) where manure is loaded for land application
or disposal.
(1 Provide for adequate drainage around manure stockpiles.
l l Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated wastes
in filter stripes around stockpiles and manure handling
areas as needed.
The issues checked () pertain to this operation. The landownerAntegrator agrees to use sound judgment in applying
insect control measures as practical.
I certify the aforementioned insect control Best Management Practices have been reviewed with me.
Name)
(Facility Number)
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
27695-7613.
AMIC—November 11, 1996

MORTALITY MANAGEMENT METHODS
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
( ) Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours
after knowledge of the death. The burial be at least 300 feet from
any flowing steam or public body of water.
( ,,►/Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G. S. 106-168.7
( ) Complete incineration
( ) In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and
design approved by the Department of -Agriculture.
( ) Any method which in the professional opinion of the State
Veterinarian would make possible the salvage of part of a dead
animal's value without endangering human or animal health. (Written
approval of the State Veterinarian must be attached)

System Calibration
Information presented in manufacturer's charts are based on average operation
conditions with relatively new equipment. Discharge rates and application rates
change over time as equipment gets older and components wear. In particular,
pump wear tends to reduce operating pressure and flow. With continued use,
nozzle wear results in an increase in the nozzle opening which will increase the
discharge rate while decreasing the wetted diameter.
You should be aware that operating the system differently than assumed in the
design will alter the application rate, diameter of coverage, and subsequently the
application uniformity. For example, operating the system with excessive pressure
results in smaller droplets, greater potential for drift, and accelerates wear of the
sprinkler nozzle. Clogging of nozzles can result in pressure increase. Plugged
intakes or crystallization of mainlines will reduce operating pressure. Operating
below design pressure greatly reduces the coverage diameter and application
uniformity.
For the above reason, you should calibrate your equipment on a regular basis to
ensure proper application rates and uniformity. Calibration at least once every
three years is recommended. Calibration involves collecting and measuring flow at
several locations in the application area. Any number of containers can be used to
collect flow and determine the application rate. Rain gauges work
best
because
they already have a graduated scale from which to read the applicationmount
aabuckets,
without having to perform additional calculations. However, pans, plastic
jars, or anything with a uniform opening and cross-section can be used provided
the liquid collected can be easily transferred to a scaled container for measuring.
For stationary sprinklers, collection containers should be located randomly
throughout the application area at several distances from sprinklers. For traveling
guns, sprinklers should be located along a transect perpendicular to the direction
of pull. Set out collection containers 25 feet apart along the transect on both
sides of the gun cart. You should compute the average application rate for all
nonuniformity of the application. On a windless day, variation between containers
of more than 30 percent is cause for concern. You should contact your irrigation
dealer or technical specialist for assistance.
-Reprinted for Certification Training for Operations of Animal Waste Management Systems Manual

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY (DWQ) [phone]
EMERGENCY MANAGEMNET SERVICES (EMS) [phone]
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SWCD) [phone]
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS) [phone]
COOPERATIVE EXTERSION SERVICE (CES) [phone]
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave you property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every
effort to ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible
location for all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should
take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may ore may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed belwo.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the'reaso6(s) that cause the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application,rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. _Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves �to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps'.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed
to flowing leaks -possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch from the, embankment to catch all
seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.

2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage notes, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off the property)?
h. How much reached -surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours call your DWQ regional office; Phone - -. After
hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility number, telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2
above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of
the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been
under taken, and the seriousness of the sitution.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phone number.
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Helath Department.
d. Contact CEs, phone number - , local SWCD office phone number - -, and local
NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -.
4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's Department and explain you
problem to them and ask the person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair or problem to minimize off -
site damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address
c. Contractors Phone:
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting
Engineer, etc.) I
a. Name: �owa L 140JUO.A Ca..0111 Food( h
b. Phone: _ glo _,1g3
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste managment plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
K

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN "
Producer: IVEY TIMOTHY NETHERCUTT
Location: PO BOX 702
RENANSVILLE NC 28349
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Wean to Feeder Swine
Number of Animals: 3552.00 pigs
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown
and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more
nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or
when the surface.is frozen. Either of these conditions may
result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop .or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
-
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
3552 pigs x .40 tons waste/pigs/year = 1420.8 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
3552 pigs x .48 lbs PAN/pigs/year = 1704.96 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
5817
4
MCC
BH
6.0
300
1.9
570
I
+APR-
�Iaa
5817
-.4
SG
50
95
I
I
I1
I
11.9
+SEP-
APR
5817
5
MCC
BH
6.0
300
1.9
570
I
1
1
+APR-
SEP
5817
-5
SG
1
50
1.9
95
I
+SEP-
APR
5817
UN2
JOA
BH
5.0
250
2.5
625
I
1
+APR-
SEP
5817
-UN2
SG
1
50
2.5
125
I
1
+SEP-
APR
END
I
TOTAL12080
- - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
+ - Dates shown reflect optimum uptake periods for nutrients. Waste
appilcation may begin up to thirty(30) days prior to planting or
green -up of forages, and extend past optimum dates shown if
plant growth, pumping conditions, and PAN loading rates permit.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
Page: 3

r
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE.& CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
+ - Dates shown reflect optimum uptake periods for nutrients. Waste
application may begin up to thirty(30) days prior to planting or
green -up of forages, and extend past optimum dates shown if
plant growth, pumping conditions, and PAN loading rates permit.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
SG
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
TONS
AC
50
50
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
WETTABLE
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
2080
6.3
0
0
6.3
2080
*** BALANCE 1 375.04 1
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 269.952 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge'every 5 years, you will have approximately 1349.76
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland.at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 4.4992 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 10.79808 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 251 depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables '1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
5817
I I
I Field I
I I
l 4 I
I I
Soil Type
MCC
I
I Crop
I
I BH
I
(Application
I (in/hr)
I
I .50
I
RatelApplic. Amount
I (inches)
I
I *1.0
I
5817
-1
l 5 I
-1
MCC
I BH
I
I .50
I
I *1.0
I
5817
I UN2 I
I I
JOA
I BH
I
I .50
I
I *1.0
I
5817
I -4 I
I SG
I .5
I *1
5817
-1
I -5 I
-1
I SG
.5
I *1
I
5817
I -UN2 I
I I
-1
-1
I SG
I
.5
I
I *1
I
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to -properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled cropsor
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8: Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 10

l
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property,
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 11

it
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at,the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:LIMESTONE CREEK FARM(31-182)
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: IVEY TIMOTHY NETHERCUTT
(Please print) ��II//
Signature: Date: I,-/.�'6U
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)BILLY W. HOUSTON
Affiliation:DUPLIN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Phone No. 910-296-2120
Address (Agency): PO BOX 219
KENANSVILLE NC 28349
Signature: USIA/ Date: 7-,1 '-00
Page: 13

USDA SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE j
FINAL CONSTRUCTION CHECK AND CERTIFICAY ION
FOR ANIMAL WASTE TREATMENT LAGOON (359)
NAME key a4-G A,:f;
LOCATION L1nnr x M le s Norfk of
SIZE OF OPERATION 6 ' FARROW. TO FEEDER .
FARROW TO FINISH
1 FARROW ;TO WEAN
CONTRACTING COMPANY Cq.rro �14 FEEDER TO FINISH
WEAN;TO FEEDER -
OTHER,.:
DESIGN DATA AND CONSTRUCTION CHECK DATA
.TBM ELEVATION SO.O,9 FEET:,
AS DESIGNED AS BUILT: .
INSIDE TOP DIMENSION 13 0 -AI ll°x a6s-
DIKE TOP WIDTH
TOP OF DIKE
BOTTOM OF LAGOON
INSIDE SIDESLOPE
OUTSIDE SIDESLOPE
PIPE INVERT
46.1
CLAY LINER/CORE TRENCH J
143,1
HAS LAGOON BEEN SEEDED TO PERMANENT VEGETATION YES ✓ NO_
DOES LAGOON MEET SCS MINIMUM STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS AS OUTLINED IN PRACTICE CODE 359?
YES
NO /
COMMENTS 4 Ch ! : '_ �r
SIGNATURE;:,'; >!•.- TITLE DATES-/S—R

LAGOON SKETCH (optional)
37
. I .

CARROLL'S FOODS, INC.
P. O. Drawer 856
WARSAW, NORTH CAROLINA 28398
FACILITY DESIGN AND
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
FARM
NAME OR NUMBER
FARM DESCRIPTION U);ElW
LOCATION
COMPANY FARM k\ h
CONTRACT GROWER \, I[ S
BEFORE BEGINNING EXCAVATION
LANDOWNER IS ADVISED TO CONTACT
ULOCU TO ASSURE THAT UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES ARE NOT DESTROYED
1-500-�33-4949
$F-
c
SCS DOES NOT CERTIFY THAT
EXCAVATION AND FILL VOLUMES
ARE CORRECT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
✓Vicinity Map.............................................................. 1
✓ASCS Field Map............................................................ 2
✓Soils Map................................................................... 3
vfoil Investigation Worksheet................................................. 4
vWaste Treatment Plan ....................................................... 5
-*ante Utilization Plan ...................................................... 6
i.Operation and Maintenance Plan ............................................. 7
✓Construction Specifications for Lagoon ....................................... 8
✓§eeding Plan (Farm Site) .................................................... 9
vComputer Drawing of Existing Ground ....................................... 10
✓txisting Elevations......................................:.................. 11
.-Lagoon Cross Section Diagram ............................................... 12
- ✓Computer Drawing of Proposed Lagoon & Building Pad ......................... 13
✓Site Balance Report......................................................... 14
vComputer Drawing - All Data - Proposed ...................................... 15
✓Computer Drawing -Contour Lines ........................................... 16
✓Computer Drawing -Sloping Lines ........................................... 17
NIA Computer Drawing -Blow-up of Lagoon Corner ................................ 18
✓ Building Pad Elevations..................................................... 19
✓Computer Cross Section - Existing_ -Proposed - ......................... 20
✓Facility Overlaid on Existing Topo Map ....................................... 21

Operator:KENNETH BOSTIC County: DUPLIN
Date:
12/27/93
Distance to nearest residence (other than
owner):
900.0
feet
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
0 sows (farrow to finish) x
1417
lbs. =
0
lbs
0 sows (farrow to feeder) x
522
lbs. =
0
lbs
0 head (finishing only) x
135
lbs. =
0
lbs
0 sows (farrow to wean) x
433
lbs. =
0
lbs
1776 head (wean to feeder) x
30
lbs. =
53280
lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE
WEIGHT
(SSLW) =
53280
lbs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF
LAGOON
Volume = 53280 lbs. SSLW x Treatment
Volume(CF)/lb.
SSLW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW=
1 CF/lb. SSLW
Volume = 53280 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
&T VkQ�.t'29 �-Lq.ana�.l'Nt,K. LFD4ZSi,
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
. 1--D 1J F R,FPu) 0 so "4
4. TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME
Inside top length 130.0 feet ; Inside top width 125.0 feet
Top of dike at elevation 46.1 feet
Freeboard 1.0 feet ; Side slopes 3.0 : 1 (Inside lagoon)
Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation 45.1 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation 35.1 feet
Seasonal high water table elevation 38.5 feet
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 124.0 119.0 10.00
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
124.0 119.0 14756 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
64.0 59.0
3776 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
94.0 89.0 33464 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = KAREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOMU * DEPTH/6
14756.0 33464.0 3776.0 1.
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT TOTAL DESIGN LIQUID LEVEL = 86660 CU. FT.

5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
130.0 125.0 16250.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
Length * Width =
0.0 0.0 0.0 square feet
TOTAL DA 16250.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Approximate daily production of manure in CF/LB SSLW 0.00136
Volume = 53280 Lbs. SSLW * CF of Waste/Lb./Day * 180 days
Volume = 13043 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculat
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallonE
per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds.evaporation by largest amount
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 9479.2 cubic feet

5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.5 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 10156.3 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A.
13043
cubic
feet
5B.
0
cubic
feet
5C.
9479
cubic
feet
5D.
10156
cubic
feet
TOTAL 32678 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
Total required volume 85958 cubic feet
Total design volume avail. 86660 cubic feet
Min. req. treatment volume plus sludge accumulation 53280 cubic f
At elev. 42.6 feet ; Volume is .53461 cubic feet (end pumping)
Total design volume less 25yr-24hr storm is 76504 cubic feet
At elev. 44.4 feet ; Volume is 75998 cubic feet (start pumping
Seasonal high water table elevation 38.5 feet
7. DESIGNED BYY1� =Y APPROVED BY :Es
DATE: DATE: 31111 �
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:
SCS DOES NOT CERTIFY THAT
EXCAVATION AND FILL VOLUMES
ARE CORRECT

lsmt!NT
Plglzgbb RIDOR el>EV,
q La3
TN? IcWL Ckoss -Sec-rlog VIEu1 D F
AIZ
BOTTOM Or 6UAih
EI.c-�V
R�cN'ARG�E D�sl�-�
INVi-ART Dr out'-p--T PIPE
y5,60 ZoTAL DE4I644
/ STDRWGF SLJcV, y q 3Ib
--i 5. 1
ABTTLE D
TOP oP DIKE
yd.11 �ELEV,
p of PAp EIEV8v /
PIPE 3o'�i-So �I �,S3D I
1MR'i of Du-tlri I _
ti4.51 EIcV,
1J ZRENTVA p
lriGyoO N /
�, SuppnRY DEPT}I
35•1i—
OoiTo1M El'E
I�p,L
W14p 4,12EA5 OF LlfJ' TA.0L-f- N1AT��iA1�
4IQ6
ll*t"OC-- A►ai'� +3c�KFl(.�.+ t� taut
Ao,meA%TEl7 wlrN

(. C
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) with
min. odor control. The time required for the planned fluid level to be
reached (permanent + temporary storage) may vary due to soil conditions
flushing operations, and the amount of fresh water added to the system.
The designed 6 months temporary storage is an estimated volume
based on: 1) waste from animals; 2) excess rainfall after evaporation;
and 3) the largest 24 hour (one day) rainfall that occurs on the
average of once every 25 years. The volume of waste generated from
a given number of animals will be fairly constant throughout the year
and from year to year. This estimate is based on 7 inches of excess
rainfall which is equal to or exceeds the highest 6 months excess in
a year. The average annual excess rainfall is approximately 8 inches.
Therefore, an average of 8 inches of excess rainfall will need to be
pumped each year. The 25 year rainfall will not be a factor to consider
in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage volume must always be
available. A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). If the outlet pipe is not installed on the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent marker must be installed on this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain minimum treatment depth (6 feet).
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without.
runoff or leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity.to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with -recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.
3. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches eleva-
tion 44.4 as marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -out when
the fluid level reaches elevation 42.6 or before the fluid depth is
less than 6 feet deep (this prevents the loss of favorable
bacteria). The design temporary storage, less 25 year storm
is 22522 cubic feet or 168465 gallons. As stated before, this
volume will vary considerably from year to year.

4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3
inch per hour.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. Keep a minimum of 25 feet of grass vegetated buffer around
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not pump within 200 feet of a
residence or within 100 feet of a well.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
Clearing:
All trees and brush shall be removed from the construction area
before any excavating or fill is started. Stumps will be removed
within the area of the foundation of the embankment and fill areas
and all excavated areas. All stumps and roots exceeding one (1)
inch in diameter shall be removed to a minimum depth of one (1)
foot. Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The
foundation area shall be loosened thoroughly before placement of
embankment material. Lagoon site (and pad site if needed) to be
stripped of topsoil (311) and stockpiled for use on dike and pad
slopes (2-311). The topsoiling quantity is in excess of amounts
specified on page one (1).
Cut-off Trench:
---------------
A cut-off trench (when specified) shall be installed as shown in
the plans.
Construction:
-------------
Construction of excavated and earthfill areas shall be performed to
the neat lines and grades as planned. Deviations from this will
require prior approval of the SCS. Earthfill shall be placed in
max. of 6" lifts and not placed in standing water. Compaction shall be
performed by the construction equipment or sheeps-foot roller during
placement. The embankment of the lagoon shall be installed using
the more impervious materials. Construction of fill heights shall
include ten (10) percent for settlement. To protect against seepage,
when areas of unsuitable material are encountered; they will to
be excavated a minimum of one (1) foot below grade and backfilled and
compacted with a SCS approved material (ie-CL,SC,CH). Refer to the soil
investigation information in the plans for special considerations.
Precautions should be taken during construction to prevent excessive
erosion and sedimentation.
Vegetation:
All exposed embankment and other bare constructed areas shall be
seeded to the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after
construction according to seeding specifications sheet.

c
SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS
-----------------------
AREA TO BE SEEDED: 1.0 ACRES
USE THE SEED MIXTURE INDICATED:
60 LBS. FESCUE GRASS § 60 LBS./ACRE
(BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER 15 TO NOVEMBER 30
0 LBS. 'PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS § 60 LBS./ACRE
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1)
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO JUNE 30
0 LBS. HULLED BERMUDA GRASS S 8 LBS./AC.
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO JULY 31
0 LBS. RYE GRAIN § 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
40 LBS. RYE GRASS § 40 LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMBER 1 TO MARCH 30
i" --v
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
1000 LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (1000 LBS./ACRE)
2 TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
100 BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 BALES/ACRE)
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 8
LBS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.

7risntstior
60.
48.
46.
44.
42.
40.
38.
lam"
Lower Left
3D Mesh Surface
Existing
Project: KENNETH BOSTIC
Drawing: 1776 NURSERY
Number:
Location:
Bid Data:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: using Sitawork
Lnotion: 20.0
.0 Mesh Surface

44.60
46.00
49.00
Plot of all data for the surface:
Existing
Project: KENNETH BOSTIC
Drawing: 1776 NURSERY
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: using Sitawork

Plot of the contour data for the surface:
Proposed
Project: KENNETH BOSTIC
Drawing: 1776 NURSERY
Number:
Location:
Bid Data:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: using Sitework

�rl.mt.tinn: -46.0 Z Meanification: 8.8 Inclination: 20.0
60.
48.
46.
44.
42.
40.
38.
36.
34.
Lower Left
30 Mesh Surface
Project: KENNETH BOSTIC
Drawing: 1776 NURSERY
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by:
using Sitework
ou Mesh Surface

Surfaces:
Proposed
Existing
Tight Volumes
Cut: 2116.68
Fill: 2718.36
Difference:-601.68
All volumes are in cubic yards.
L
Expansion (%)
0.00
20.00
Net Import:
Expanded Volumes
2116.68 II V I � 3262. 03 — Dq V 1 O1 V NAB L
+0 MOV&r
1145.35 - Toy Wl ` () 6E ',M. o i e-
Grid cell size: 5.96 by 5.98
Original scale: 100.00ft/in
Project: KENNETH BOSTIC
Drawing: 1776 NURSERY
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: using Sitework

40.50
3.0;�
35,wrl�t- .............: 35.11
i .g0�2w-
1J5� El v-v
35.i1
130`
11
-�' d .11 44.50
4.b. �.I..._;
aa. fie
�04b.00 76.00
0
qM1 lgob
RDwfl yD'
17
Daylight a 4
g,00
Plot of all data for the surface:
Proposed
Project: KENNETH BOSTIC
Drawing: 1776 NURSERY
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: using Sitework

Daylight
Plot of the contour data for the surface:
Proposed
Project: KENNETH BOSTIC
Drawing: 1776 NURSERY
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: using Sitework 771

4.50
6.00
00
17
Plot of the sloping lines for the surface:
Proposed
Project: KENNETH BOSTIC
Drawing: 1776 NURSERY
Number:
Location:
Bid Data:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: .using Sitawork

;e
�e
VFww=TM gnCyyn! I"R NURSERY: Pr000sRd 27 DEC 93 12:37 PM

60.99
48.00
46.00
I
441-.0
42. 00
40.00
3E
36.00
34. 00
(246.64,487.18)
KENNETH BOSTIC: 1776 NURSERY
<370.90>
(294.11,119.33)
27 DEC 93 12:37 PH

I

OUnited States
Department of
Agriculture
'-% P. O. Box 277
Soi1
Conservation Kenansville, NC 28349
Service Telephone [phone]
WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY SITE EVALUATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
LOCATION tvy poi
oy 84 'a.,Llr n ( 111
TELEPHONE i 9 s 9 d = 401-g 7 SIZE OF OPERATION) .7 L G1 +3> }n re
� 4
LOCATION DATA
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER
NUMBER OF HOUSES WITHIN 2000 FEET OF SITE 2
IS SITE WITHIN 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? YES NO _�K,
IS SITE AT LEAST 100 FEET FROM A 'BLUE LINE' PERENNIAL STREAM? YES_ NO
IS SITE WITHIN 1 MILE ZONING JURISDICTION OF A MUNICIPALITY? YES_ NO
if yes, landowner should consult with local zoning board about required permits
WETLANDS
WILL SITE INVOLVE CLEARING WOODLAND OR ANY NON CROPLAND? YES t,--' NO
IF YES, HAS PRODUCER COMPLETED AN AD-1026 FORM? YES ✓ NO
DOES NON WETLAND NEED TO BE MEASURED BY REGISTERED SURVEYOR PRIOR TO
APPROVING WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN YES_ NO ✓
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PRODUCER TO CONTACT THE US
ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND THE NC DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TO
DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL PERMITS ARE'REQUIRED. NO WETLANDS SHOULD BE ALTERED UNTIL
PRODUCER RECEIVES WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM SCS, US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND NC
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
WASTE MANAGEMENT -- VALID ONLY IF WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN ATTACHED
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY LAND APPLY WASTE? YES t� NO
IF NO, DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE LAND? YES_ NO_
SEE ATTACHED PLAN FOR SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS
SOIL INVESTIGATION -- VALID ONLY IF SOIL .INVESTIGATION SHEET ATTACHED
IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR LAGOON?
IS A CLAY LINER REQUIRED?
IF YES, IS CLAY AVAILABLE ONSITE?
IS A CORE_ TRENCH REQUIRED?
YES Le-' NO
YESNO
YES NO QUESTIONABLE
YES NO
SITE APPROVED iTS ✓ NO___ CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL BASED ON ti:S S fANT):%';Os "ALII? F'Ok 0) D.\Y S Fltom 1)""n: SIGMA). THIS APPROVAL I
r \t (N)\ Il Sl' I 7.v l .:1 : t(:.r 'C:'
'A
i)AI.. (1

lk
1
4%
L
�U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
R., 5-70 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE _
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND IT
� r 1
• •••• r •• r • r :•• ill I Ill
vvn■■■■■i■■Lllri■\■i■■■■■
eieieiiii��
ii■■■ie■■■■■�i
`-
�©�©lit©�i!01�01m1m�®►®�ml®�m►mlmlm►�I®I01©
■®I■i■■j■■■i■■I■I■I■I■I■I■!■I■I■I■I■I■■■
�W
I■W
I
■I■I■I■I■1■I■1■I■I■I■i■I■I■II■
■®�■�■i■i■�ii
■i■�■I■t■i■I■i■i■i■i■I■I■i■I■
MINES■I■■I■11■■I■i■I
I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I
I■I■I■
MMIM
■I�■1■II�■■I■I■I�I■!■I■i■I■I■■�I■■I■
��������1■�I■�
��I�I��I�I�I�I�i0l�lel�
®
l■!■■!■1■i■�l■I■1■1■'■�■�■�■1■i■i■Ei■IN
■I■I■I■■
I■
i■I■I■I■'■I■I■I■I■I■I■■■I■
�®�
�el■i■�e�����■�■�■■del■�■i■I��■i■�■�

r `.

m

4 � 0
ME
W
z
0
N
QI
; W:
ffi"

�r.3 2 y ra L .. r •�A' f �-.-. C
� f
. ` ` P. 0. Box 277
,..r,Soil
s UDne�^iot Conservation Kenansville, NC 28349
AOcufture �^"� , .i ;Y� Telephone [phone]
a
z „:
r�
IJ� "2$ (P
Dear
Enclosed is your copy of a wetland deferiirination for tract SQ/ 7 on which you indicated
your intent to clear some land. The attkched map has been delineated to show the area(s) in
question. Each area to be cleared has been identified with a symbol to denote its classification.
Below is art explanation of the various iynbols that may pertain to your map.
W - Wetland - Area is a wetland and should not be cleared for any reason if you .
wish to remain eligible for USDA programs; receive. SCS technical assistance, or avoid
violating US Army Corp of Engineers' and Division'of Environmental Management
(DEM) regulations. Any exceptions to this s'tat Ent should be in writing from the Soil
Conservation Service prior to clearing land.
X NW- Non wetland -Area is non wetland and can be cleared and utilized without
violating Farm Bill. ;i;
NW- Non wetland - Area has hydric soils but for Farm Bill purposes only, area is
non wetland due to hydrology modification prior to 12/23/85. You still need to check
with the US Army Corp of Engineers or the NC DEM to determine if additional permits
are necessary prior to clearing.
CW Converted Wetland after 11/28/90 Area was cleared after 11/28/90 and is
a converted wetland. Clearing constitutes a violation of the 1990 Farm Bill. In order to
regain eligibility for USDA programs, area must be restored. Consult with the SCS
about an approved restoration plan before beginning any restoration.
If you need to clear the delineated wetlands for roads, buildings, hog lagoons or similar
activities, you can request a converted wetland for non agricultural use (CWNA) exemption.
If granted, this exemption would be for Farm Bill purposes only; therefore, you would still
need to contact the Army Corp of Engineers and the Division of Environmental Management.
To request a CWNA exemption, you should complete a request form at the SCS office. It will
take approximately 40 days to get this exemption approved once you give this office the
request. Do not start any clearing of wetland prior to receiving written notification from
this office that your CWNA request has been approved. Also you should not start clearing
until you have received approval from the Army Corp and DEM. All three permits must be
received and approved prior to clearing any wetlands.
I have tried to make this determination as fairly as possible. However if you believe this
determination is incorrect, you have the right to appeal. To appeal send me a brief letter
explaining why you believe this determination is incorrect. Send the letter to the address on
the letterhead. This letter should be received within 15 days of your receipt of this letter.
The Soll conaeivation Service
Is sin agency of the
lJDepanment of Agricullwe
Sincerely,
ahkael E. Su� gg�l�
Mic
District Conservationist

S•0-4 SCy nA 026 _ 1 Namex ' n r , 2 Date of Request
' t �.y Address Cf person
ada,tih9erlahon Sernce` :' ,r < < unest) ' •G�( 10 ... - .
7 '
,HIGHLY'ERODIBLE LAND AND WETLAND s O y $ C°°n�
CONSERVATION DETERMINATION I '
Name of USDA Agency or Person Requesting Detemdnation Farm No. and Tract No
SECTION I :tOGHLY.ERODIBLE LAND
•
FI ELD NO (s)...
.TOTAL ACRES ..
-
-
6. Is soil survey now available for making a highly erodible land detenttirtajdrt9 No
,.., Yes ❑
' 7. Are there h!ghly erodible soil map units on this farm?. Yes -iAZZINo
8. List highly erodible fields that, according to ASCS records, were used an agrialtural commodity in any '.
crop year during 1981-1985. - K #
r
9. List highly erodible fields that have been or will be converted for bite P10ductionxdf agricultural commodities and
- -
-
-. according to ASCS records, were not used for this purpose in any aop er4u`nrtg 1gg1-1985: and were not
- -
-
enrolled in a USDA set -aside ordiversion program. " - '..;1.41t..r.; .;
10. This Highly Erodible Land determination was completed in the: -'`-'Office "`;.; Feld ❑
�
� •.
:� � �
FIELD NO.(s)
TOTAL ACRES
11. Am there dric soils on this farts? Yes16 'No❑ .
. 12. Wetlands (M. including abandoned wetlands, or Farmed Wetlands (FW) or Fanned W Pasture (FWP) .,
Wetlands be famed '
may under natural conditions. Farmed. Wetlands and Farmed We
. - ashmt maybe
Pas
farmed and maintained in the same manner as they were prior to December 23 1985, they are not
` : - ". "
-
--
abandoned. -
13. Prior Converted Cropland (PC). Wetlands that were converted prior to December 23. iglIS The use, management..
drainage, and alteration of prior converted cropland (PC) are not subject to the wetlandconservation provisions unless
.
the area reverts to wetland as a result of abai donmenL-
14. Artificial Wetlands (Ala). Artificial wetlands includes irrigation -induced wetlands. These reetlands are not subject
-
to the wetland conservation provisions..
15. Minimal Effect Wetlands (MM. These wetlands are to be fanned according to the mirumel-effect agreement signed
at the time the minimal -effect determination was made...
16. ,M gation Wetlands (MIW). Wetlands on which a person is actively mitigating a frequently cropped area or a wetand
converted between December 23. 1985 and November 28, 1990.
-17. Restoration with Violation (RV W-year). A restored wetland that was in violadon as'a result of conversion after-
- November 28, 1990. or the planting of an agricultural commodity or forage crop!
_
* 18. Restoration without Violation (RSW). A restored wetland converted between December 23,.1985 and--
- November 28, 1990. on which an agricultural comity has not been planted: - •:: - - . -
19. Replacement Wetlands (RPM. Wetlands which are converted for purposes other than to increase production;
where the wetland values are being replaced at a second site.-
20. Good Faith Wetlands (GFW.year). Wetlands on which ASCS has determined a vbtation -be.ln good faith and the
welbeenand has been restored. �'
- 21. Contend Wetlands (CM. Wetlands cornrow after December 23. 198s end pdor to
ts
year plat N al V w on thw Convened Wadarde. cake bartallta.
�for �USDA
h22.,C4rtvataO Watlend(CWryon. W60wiftOWN~ SIW
�+T•^ -`+R
-
barlaltte late! two iaadertd 4 twMrad. ''f'...'.sx(t' x;=+,*:
b
s
23. Converted Wetland Non -Agricultural use (CWNA). Wetlands that arc CGttYrflod for "M ash prod licit , flhubs,'t
eranberties. Ntieyards of building and road tonstmctbn. ?-as#'>f Y_ -• - -
24. Converted Wetland Technical Error (CWTE). Wetlands that were 001 M d M a r*M of Mtcerect determination
by SCS.
25. The planned alteration measures on wetlands in fields - are considered maintenance and are in compliance
with FSA.-
26. The planned alteration measures on wetlands in fields - are not considered to be maintenance and if
installed will cause the area to become a Converted Wetland (CW).`See Item 22 fof Information on CW+year.
27. The wetland determination was completed in the office ❑ fieldy] and was dbWered❑ mailecIF'I to the person on L
28. Remarks. C.t , -� �' ' !
e7.)
L rt /), • : , 17-t4= i i`t.-7lr-''Tf
g
29. 1 cenify that the above determination is ronect and adequate for use in determining 30. Signature of SCS District Conservationist 31. Date
eligibi1hy for USDA program benefits, and that wetland hydrology, hydric rolls. and )j /
hydrophytic vegetation under normal circumstances exist on all areas outlined as
IVenlmds. Farmed Wetlands. and FarmedWetlandsPasture,/�-
Assistance and programs of the Soil Conservation Service available wrfhout nigaN to race, retlgion, color, sex, age, or handicap.
,f:'Pcs'son Copv

7 JA Q
Grp i
Aims,
a
'wg. W11 Irr
'A. -1 1-
OAT"?
low
7v e,;:
its
M
I P4 p.
RZO.,
WN,
� w

TOWN OF BEULAVILLE
P. 0. 80X 98 PHONE [phone]
BO UVILLE, N. C.
28518
January 14, 1994
Mr. Kenneth Earl Bostic
Post Office 831
Beulaville, North Carolina 28518
Dear Mr. Bostic:
This is to inform you that your property in question located
on 111 north from the center of Beulaville is not located within
the Town of Beulaville or its zoning district. If I may be of
further service please do nothesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Billy Farmer
Town Manager
s

AGIUMEAT SERVICES 1NC
PO BOX 1096
BEULAVILLE, NC 28518
[phone] teVfav
6/22/99
Mr. Brian Wrenn
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Dear Mr. Wrenn,
This memo is to ual inspection that was conducted for Kenneth Bostic he
had one (FN 31-182).
The small tree noted on the outer dike wall of the lagoon was properly removed and
should no longer threaten the integrity of the structure.
If you have any questions please feel free to call.
With Kind Regards,
G�2 <11��
Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Technical Specialist
Agriment Services, Inc.
cc Kenneth Bostic

Revised April 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number 31 - 1$L
Farm Name:_ )�Wruu� �ic V dirw_
On -Site Representative: LAnefll 901hy
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: ian �hr
Date of site visit: Sl2�lga
Date of most recent WUP: I 16IJK
Annual farm PAN deficit: ® i . pounds
Operation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Operation pended for we le acre
determination based o P1 P2 P3
Irrigation System(s) - circle : 1. hard-hbse travele 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary grin system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part II, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE:75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part III).
PART II. 75% Rule. Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed=below:
_F1 Lack. ofacreagewhich resulted to-over-application:ofWastewater_(PAN) on -.spray
field(s) according -toiarm'stasttwoyears :ofirrigationzecords.-.
F2 Unclear, -illegible, -or lack of information/map.
F3 ObviousfeldiimitationslnumerousAitches;#ailurefo:deduct7equired
buffer/setbackzcreage;-or 25%:of.total.acreage-identifiedan .CAWMP.7includes
small,-irregulady shaped fields fields less 1han-5-acresfortravelers-or.lessthan
2 acrestor.stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

_ Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number JIZ?-
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA natorminnrinn
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER',2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
rCAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS'
I
—
I
FIFI D N"AA0001
k,,.1..,.,a .,..0
— _ ____ _ ____
—_
— NU alum, vi Puuu uumbersTnay be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross -more -than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBER2 - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP.acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in thefarm'sprevioustwo years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigationTecords,-cannot serve as the
sole basis -for requiring a WA Determination.=Back-up#Ieldsmustbenoted in the-commentsectiommnd must be accessible
by irrigation system.
Part IV. Pending WA Determinations -
LP1 Plan. lacks.following-information: J6, h94 rn 1) An bit 40 Qtknoe 1 ee, WJ
P2 Plan revision may:satisfy75% rule based on adequate overall PAN deficit -and by
adjusting all fiieldacreageto below 75% use rate
P3 Other (ie/in process of installing new irrigation system):

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Kenneth Bostic
Kenneth Bostic Farm
PO Box 831
Beulaville NC 28518
Dear Kenneth Bostic:
AMY�:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 31-182
Duplin County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRYI, DRY2, DRY3, SLURI, SLUR2,
SLDI, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Sincere
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
Telephone[phone] Fax [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Division of Water Quality
November 5, 1997
U;:_�,�:Li1�J:l7i�1�1�
Kenneth Bostic
Kenneth Bostic Farm
PO Box 831
Beulaville, NC 28518
Subject: Notice of Violation
Kenneth Bostic Farm
Farm Number: 31-182
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Bostic:
e�
r/1
NCDENP,
NORTH GROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTANO NATURAL RESa RCES
You are hereby notified that the Kenneth Bostic Farm, which has been deemed permitted
to have a nondischarge permit for an animal waste disposal system
.0217, has been found to be in violation of its 2H .0217 Permit. pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H
On October 30, 1997, staff from the Wihnin
gton
insPected your animal operation and the lagoon(s) serving his office
Of the Division
of observed that the
waste application records for this facility in an over application of nitrogen to the sera
fields for the coastal bermuda crop. The waste utilization plan limits the application rate for
coastal bermuda on field un2 at 2251bs of nitrogen per acre; however, approximately 32rate of
nitrogen per acre have been applied.
USDA -MRCS guidelines require that waste be applied at agronomic rates that do not
exceed the nitrogen requirements for the Realistic Yield Expectation of the crop. Because of the
excessive nitrogen loading, no further waste application may occur on the small grain °verseed
in field 11112 for the year. In addition, as was discussed at the time of the inspection, the erosion
areas c the inner and outer dike walls of the lagoon should be filled with a suitable clay material,
compacted and reseeded with an aPPrePfiate vegetative cover. Low
idled. graded and reseeded or a suitable drainage structure should be establisheds in dh°uld be
piles in field un2 should be removed and the areas reseeded, and a berm should be built around
Large brush
the hydrant in the wetland area. The irrigation line eseede ,the ditch behind the lagoon should
be double -piped to reduce the risk of damage. A separate IRR-2 form should be used for each
127 North Cardinal D, Wilntington, North Carolina 0%Telere 28405
An Equal Opportunity Afrirnative Action Employer 5one9r0-395-3900 FAX [phone]
0"/.
cycled/10 % post -consumer paper

Kenneth Bostic
November 5, 1997
Page 2
waste
spray field, and the certification form should be kept on site with the certified animal
management plan•
We suggest that you contact yourr� e G`'n'p�y' 10� GCS or Soil and Water District office
for any assistance they may be able to provide to correct the situation. .
The Division of Water Quality will proceed to revoke Kenneth Bostic Farm's permit unless
the following conditions are completed:
1. Immediately eliminate the discharge of wastewater and/or list actions to correct the noted
violation.
2. Make any modifications needed to ensure there will be no future discharges.
To remain a deemed permitted facility, you must notify this office in writing within fourteen
(14) days of the receipt of this notice, what actions will be taken to comply with your waste
management plan. Failure to comply with the above conditions will cause the existing animal
waste management system serving your animal operation to be considered in operation without
a permit as required by North Carolina General Statute 143 215.1.
ent the Division of Water Quality from
Please be advised that this assessment does not prev
taking enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violations.
When the required corrective actions are complete, please notify this office in writing. If You
have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to contactle at (919 733- 0r. 83,
Wrenn, of our Wilmington Office at (910)-395-3900 or Mr. Shannon Lang y ( )
ext. 581.
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver, P.G.
Regional Supervisor

cc.
Harold Jones, County Soil and Water Conservation
Sandra Weitzel, Regional Coordinator, NC DSWC
Don Butler, Carroll's Foods
DWQ Operations Branch File
Wilmington Files
Operations Branch
S : \ W QS\B RIAN W \ENFORC E\31-182#2. NO V

AGRIMENT SERVICES INC
PO BOX 1096
BEULAVILLE, NC 28518
[phone],_ [phone]
11/13/97
Mr. Brian Wrenn
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Dear Mr. Wrenn,
RECEIVED
NOV 111997
BY:
This letter is to address the 10/30/97 annual inspection that was conducted for Kenneth
Bostic he had one facility (IN 31-182).
Farm 31-182 had several deficiencies and one violation:
I. Over application of waste for coastal bermuda field un2. (NOV)
2. Erosion problems on inner/outer dike walls of the lagoon. (NOD)
3. Low area in field 5 not adequate for waste application. (NOD)
4. Large brush pile should be removed in field un2. (NOD)
5. Irrigation line should be double -piped in area crossing ditch. (NOD)
6. Individual IRR-2 forms should be kept for each spray field. (NOD)
7. Certification form should be on site with CWW. (NOD)
W. Bostic will repair inner/outer dike walls with suitable clay material and establish
appropriate vegetative cover weather permitting.
Mr. Bostic realizes that 401 wetland area is inappropriate for waste application at the
present time. Mr. Bostic does plan to make area acceptable for waste application when
financial/weather condition permits; however, does not need this area to fulfill agronomic
requirements at the present time. Mr. Bostic currently has a berm around area from prior
DWQ correspondence and has been avoiding application to the area due to it being
unacceptable at the present time. Mr. Bostic will establish a berm around the hydrant
located in this area weather permitting.
Mr. Bostic will remove brush pile in field un2 weather permitting.
Mr. Bostic will double -pipe irrigation crossing weather permitting.
Agriment Services will develop separate IRR-2 forms for each field separated by 401 area.

A copy of the certification form has been placed in Mr. Bostic's notebook.
NOTICE OF VIOLATION EXPLANATION
I changed ERR-2 form to the yield of 300 pounds per/acre for coastal bermuda on
un2. I felt the yield should be comparable to the yield for the soil type on the
adjacent fields, which is McC or Marvyn. Since the field was cleared and ready for
application I created the IRR-2 form so Mr. Bostic could begin monitoring and
reporting requirements for this field. Mr. Bostic was relying on Duplin Soil and
Water to measure this field and create a new WUP to include this field. I was not
aware until I saw the NOV for over -application that in the new plan, Duplin Soil &
Water classified this field LUA or Lumbee soil type, which has a yield of 225 pounds
per/acre for coastal bermuda. I am not a Soil Scientist, but I feel this soil type was
made in error. Therefore, I have contacted Robert Freese, a Soil Scientist with
Duplin Soil and Water, to make an official determination of the soil type in field
un2. If the soil is comparable to the adjoining soils the WUP can be changed to
show the higher realistic yield. Over -application would be 20 pounds rather than
75 pounds with the Lumbee soil. As a good faith effort Mr. Bostic has agreed to
seed the small grain on field un2 and not apply this area to accommodate any
residual Nitrogen. If the soil is indeed changed, Mr. Bostic may want to apply the
30 remaining pounds of Nitrogen deficit that would remain on this field, less the 20
lbs. that would be residual, but only if DWQ allows it.
I hope this infonnation will address the Notice of DeficienciesfViolation that were noted,
If you have any questions please feel free to call.
With Kind Regards,
/o�nnie G. Kennedy Jr.�
Technical Specialist
Agriment Services, Inc.
cc Kenneth Bostic
Harold Jones, Duplin Soil and Water Conservation
Don Butler, Carroll's Foods

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, RECEIVED
Health and Natural ResouWMA
rce • aqDivision of Water Quality MAY o 9 1997 �
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor BY:
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary p E H N F1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
May 5, 1997
' 1 I • I
1' •
MR. KENNETH BOSTIC
P.O. BOX 931
BEULAVILLE, NC 28518
Subject: Acceptance of Settlement Offer
Bostic Swine Farm
Case #: DD 96-012
Duplin County
Farm #: 31-182
Dear Mr. Bostic:
On June 28, 1996, you were assessed $2,337.47 ($2,000.00 civil penalty and $337.47
investigative costs) for discharging waste to the waters of the State in violation of NCAC 2H
.0217.
The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has
accepted your offer to settle the monetary civil penalties assessed by the Director of DWQ for the
total amount of $1,337.47. Payment shall be made by check payable to the North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources at the following address:
Attention: Bob Sledge
Department of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Please be advised that payment of this penalty in no way precludes further action by the
Division for additional violations of the State's environmental laws.
If you have any questions about this letter, please feel free to. contact Mr. Shannon Langley
at [phone], extension 581.
Sincerely, I
4Aeton How r., P.E.
cc: Wilmirigton Regional Office
Enforcement file DD 96-012
Central files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50016 recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Kenneth Bostic
Kenneth Bostic Farm
PO Box 831
Beulaville 'NC 28518
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Kenneth Bostic Farm
Facility ID#: 31-182
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Bostic:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
�1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., erector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Wilmington Regional Office _
Water Quality Files
C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative
P.O. Box 27687, N%f
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 ffirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources • •
Wilmington Regional Office AT4
Division of Water Quality -�
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor [D E H N FI
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
September 24, 1996
Mr. Michael E. Sugg
USDA-NRCS
P.O. Box 277
Kenansville, NC 28349
Dear Mr. Sugg:
Kenneth Bostic Farm
Facility: 31-182
As per your request, Division staff have reviewed the site plan submitted for the Kenneth Bostic
Faun. This letter is to inform you that the Division concurs with the proposed actions outlined by this
plan. I realize that the schedule of operations is based on the activities involved with applying for and
obtaining Agricultural Cost Share Program (ACSP) funds and U.S. Corps of Engineers approval. I
would ask that a final site plan and schedule of operations with a completion date specified be forwarded
to this office at such time as approval is granted and the landowner is notified. Please include with this
final site plan your written determination of the realistic expected yields for Mr. Bostic's waste plan as
per our conversation.
In addition, A revision of this plan or additional measures may be required if a documented water
quality violation is found resulting from this site in the future.
Thank you for your attention and timely work in this matter. If you have any further questions,
please contact me or Mr. David Holsinger at [phone].
Sincerely,
ames Bushardt, P.E.
Acting Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Kenneth Bostic
Don Butler
Wilmington Files
S: IWQSIDAVEHI aANCONC.LET
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845 • Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL N P 455 551 348
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Kenneth Bostic
P.O. Box 831
Beulaville, NC 28518
Dear Mr. Bostic
AUG 2 2 1996
..._----------------� E H N 11
August 14, 1996
RE: Waste Utilization Plan
Facility 31-182
Duplin County
This letter is in regards to the Waste Utilization Plan submitted to the Division of Water Quality
on June 10, 1996, for the Kenneth Bostic Farm. After careful review, the Division has the following
concerns and comments which must be satisfactorily addressed before any acceptance maybe given for
the plan:
1. A certification form signed by a designated technical specialist.
2. In the cropping plan all yields appear to be a high level management maximum. Please include
site yield records to verify the Realistic Yield Expectation. Or, adjust yields and application rates
accordingly.
3. Please verify and submit relevant calculations such as Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN), etc.
4. Vegetated buffers and swale areas between spray fields 1 and 3 and the Section 404 wetland area
should be placed in accordance with USDA-NRCS guidelines before application of waste to these
fields. The placement of a berm in these areas would not be acceptable as a berm structure
would prevent proper drainage of storm water and accelerate erosion of the site.
5. The irrigation system has been altered. Please submit information as to the application
capabilities of the altered system.
6. The Section 404 wetland area cannot be planted with fescue. In it's present condition, only
activities outlined in Section 404 are allowed in this area.
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845• Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Kenneth Bostic a'
August 14, 1996
,OfrIj A-
Page 2.
7. The Division recommends that the wind rowed trees behind fields one and three be removed to
allow for proper placement of a vegetated buffer and drainage for these fields.
8. Due to the proximity of wetlands, blockage of natural drainage, insufficient buffers.and projected
possible environmental impacts, an additional three (3) acres of appropriate spray area should
be utilized. It is our understanding that this acreage is available on the site and had been
previously delineated for use by a DSWC soil scientist. -
Please review the information provided and re -submit your completed Certified Waste
Management Plan which satisfies the concerns outlined above on or before August 23, 1996. Failure
to do so may result in this office recommending that the facilities deemed permitted status be revoked.
This would result in an individual non discharge permit being required for the facility. The plan
submitted on June 10, 1996, will be kept for future reference as a part of this facilities file.
If you have any further questions, please contact me at [phone], ext:207.
cc: Dave Adkins
Dennis Ramsey
Jim Gregson
John Dorney
Ronald-G-Kennedy)
Wilmington Files
s: I wgsldaveh Iduplin 131-182NA.let
Sincerely,
CZ I' C- (/-- S tr-1 t V � t—
Rick S. Shiver, P.G.
Regional Supervisor
A W-)
VUZJ A41 44 QI-a fw41�
,1-,L,x�
S k,,," '-VIA w., l�

State, of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources F` •
Wilmington Regional Office
Division of Water Quality �r
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor D E H N F1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
August 14, 1996
CERTIEIED-MAIL-!f P_455'55i-3.483
Mr. Kenneth Bostic
P.O. Box 831
Beulaville, NC 28518
Dear Mr. Bostic
RE: Waste Utilization Plan
Facility 31-182
Duplin County
This letter is in regards to the Waste Utilization Plan submitted to the Division of Water Quality
on June 10, 1996, for the Kenneth Bostic Farm. After careful review, the Division has the following
concerns and comments which must be satisfactorily addressed before any acceptance maybe given for
the plan:
1. A certification form signed by a designated technical specialist.
2. In the cropping plan all yields appear to be a high level management maximum. Please include
site yield records to verify the Realistic Yield Expectation. Or, adjust yields and application rates
accordingly.
3. Please verify and submit relevant calculations such as Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN), etc.
4. Vegetated buffers and swale areas between spray fields 1 and 3 and the Section 404 wetland area
should be placed in accordance with USDA-NRCS guidelines before application of waste to these
fields. The placement of a berm in these areas would not be acceptable as a berm structure
would prevent proper drainage of storm water and accelerate erosion of the site.
5. The irrigation system has been altered. Please submit information as to the application
capabilities of the altered system.
6. The Section 404 wetland area cannot be planted with fescue. In it's present condition, only
activities outlined in Section 404 are allowed in this area.
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 28405-38450 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Kenneth Bostic
August 14, 1996
Page 2.
7. The Division recommends that the wind rowed trees behind fields one and three be removed to
allow for proper placement of a vegetated buffer and drainage for these fields.
8. Due to the proximity of wetlands, blockage of natural drainage, insufficient buffers,and projected
possible environmental impacts, an additional three (3) acres of appropriate spray area should
be utilized. It is our understanding that this acreage is available on the site and had been
previously delineated for use by a DSWC soil scientist. -
Please review the information provided and re -submit your completed —Certified Waste
Management Plan which satisfies the concerns outlined above on or before August 23, 1996-.�'Failure
to do so may result in this office recommending that the facilities deemed permitted status b re evoked.
This would result in an individual non discharge permit being required for the facility. The plan
submitted on June 10, 1996, will be kept for future reference as a part of this facilities file.
If you have any further questions, please contact me at [phone], ext207.
Sincerely,
1, L (L S h� V C t--
Rick S. Shiver, P.G.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Dave Adkins
Dennis Ramsey
Jim Gregson
John Dorney
Ronald G. Kennedy, Jr.
lW.ilinington-Files
s:IwgsldavehlduplinL31-181NA.let

May 30, 1996
Mr. Shannon Langley
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section -Operations Branch
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Dear Mr. Langley,
RECEIVED
JUN 3 1996
""U"ES ASSESSMENT UAIT
Enclosed are several documents and records that I have kept for my facility. Also
enclosed are the improvements that I have made to get my spray field in the best
condition to receive waste. I have gone beyond the call of duty to make my facility as
environmentally sound as possible and Agriment Services Technicians have spent a lot of
their time showing me how to better manage my facility. I hope the information
enclosed will suffice for the material that was requested.
gWith Kind Regards,
Kenneth Bostic

IMPROVEMENTS MADE TO THE KENNETH BOSTIC FARM
�1
f
SEe'Da0g04f tve71t4NZ>S I
1. BERM AT OUTLET OF-'^' e "'"". AREA" 154D v\D ? 9- l2F-/YLO"'� � ,
—
2. DIVERTED ALL SURFACE WATER THAT WAS ENTERING 46 a4yZIGN'
AREA.
3. REDUCED NOZZLE SIZE ON SMALL TRAVELER IRRIGATION GUN AND.. '0
INCREASED TRAVELER SPEED SO AS NOT TO EXCEED HYDRAULIC '
LOADING.
4. REDUCED NUTRIENT CONTENT IN LAGOONS SO AS NOT TO EXCEED
AGRONOMIC LOADING. (LAB ANALYSIS INCLUDED). (�p2�2Ec t �D ?A4 C4.IL.
5 t GTG o a7 40q uv-iO�TL rl eJD
5. DO NOT SPRAY IN AREA UNTIL IT IS DETERMINED THAT
AREA CAN ACCEPT WASTE AT AGRONOMIC AND HYDRAULIC RATES. i

AGRIMENT SERVICES INC
P.O. BOX 1096
BEULAVILLE, N.0 28518
[phone]
PER/FIELD APPLICATION RECORDS
START
STOP
CROP
FIELD
TOTAL
LBS.N
LBS.N
NEEDS
DATE PUMPING
PUMPING
TYPE
NUMBER
HOURS
APPLIED
REQUIRED
DEFICIT
,ohs g;o0�.
n:000n
c-
i 56l 7
ac.z 3
7y•5
ac 9
�9yS
9. 7
19y5
7y91•
DO
7-5
/03o pS 6:0�0^
�:3oyti
"
��
a.�
La•I
8a•�5
to2o.65
to •Il w�
�u2
1
JOYS YS y: 0op�
G :00pn
__�o,�•
Q
z
y .7
3G7
316. Y
3a�bs/P``
ate&
/I1a ys 3:coph
L .00
3
7y•S
aic• 9
ya y
1/40.3 U
11 Is 15 a0
ay.�
cL5 a36 .K 7 73
Sb 2i • --� lop
"1 4 lo:mAn y:3o n I , i
,� (,.,S 7G/.yd 131 .o -). —3o.41y

AGRIMENT SERVICES INC
P.O. BOX 1096
BEULAVILLE, N.0 28518
[phone]
PER/FIELD APPLICATION RECORDS
START
STOP
CROP FIELD
TOTAL
LBS.N
LBS.N NEEDS
DATE PUMPING
PUMPING
TYPE NUMBER
r 6.1/oc
HOURS
APPLIED
REQUIRED DEFICIT
VOL
l "DoA►1
o
lCoan
[k� It `bVi l n
y9 )
/S58•o . 16OR 3
33 oDOA
: oo r.
It
/ y9
5! og• 3 /3.Sq• a c
yq 96
9•m4n
l%00.prh
��
ly9
/�5Y•aI /-2/o,a�
y ll 96�/
y /3
Il:oo/}/1
Spoor,-
II it
b
/7�
/66/•�,L 9'/a • a..
:qom
_.jLao*v,%
,f /�
6
/
763•a�
REMARKS:

rc 1
Farmer:
Address 1:
Address 2:
City,State & Zip:
Phone Number:
Social Security NO:
ASCS Track No:
Total Acres of Application Fields:
Location: NORTH OF BEULAVILLE ON NC111
Soil Types:
Total Animals:
BOSTIC, KENNETH E.
P.O. BOX 831
HWY 111 N.
BEULAVILLE NC 28518
910-298-4287
577-66-6012
D70877
6.11
APPROX. 1 MI
MCC
3552
Please Provide *****
Begin Pump: ...................... ............
End Pump: ............. ......................
Nitrogen Sample: .. ..........................
Individual Field Acreage UN1 ...............
Individual Field Acreage
...............
Individual Field Acreage ...............
Individual Field Acreage
...............
Individual Field Acreage ...............
Individual Field Acreage _
Individual Field Acreage
Individual Field Acreage _
Individual Field Acreage ......
Individual Field Acreage
...............
Total Acres
Irrigation Information:
Interval:
Total Gallons per/year:
Pounds Available per/acre/year:
Output******Field UN1
Gallons needed per year on field:
Acre Inces per application field per year
Total Hours Needed in field per year:
-Hours currently needed:
151996
106922
1.60
6.11
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
6.11
.35
3
674
177 rAccdS
3a5
675,919 .II
25
71
24

Sample 1D:
1®1
Waste Code:
AIS
Description:
urower. 150suc, tnennem E. KeporlNo: W00144.
110 Box 831
Beulaville, NC 28518 Copies To: County ensi0n Directo
1//�1pil Agriment Services Inc.
ervices nc.
Y//,-
te nalysis eport
DuplinCounty
8/24/95
Fann:
l'Y'M w rarOI7 Y.tl.✓ =6iY ,cxF.M�!u g,
1.ahOratO RCSUI[5, art$ er m111100�U�ICSS
_ .. .._... ry ._,.....1 .. , � . .. d, .
w.ryyW+ n+ sr'nt 1:.w^sM+b^uae e^e•`Y '., i +�'„+f S -e�lt"y �e
0[hIrMSC
._ _„s_._..
DAM N
P K
Ca Mg S Fe AM Zn
Cu B Alo Cl
Na Ni
Cd
616
43.4 514
96.5 28.7 20.8 2.25 0.23 1.08
0.35 0.71
103
Nutrients Available for First Crop
Ibs/1000 gallons
Other Elements lbs/li
ApplkalionAfetbod
N P205
K20 Ce Mg S Fe Aln Zn
Cu B Me Cl
Na Ni
Cd
Irrigation
23 0.58
4.1 0.56 0.17 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.01
0.00 0.00
0.86
Infected _
4.6 0.66
4.6 0.64 0.19 0.14 0.02 0.00 0.01
0.00 0.00
Pb
17,=

.R E P 0 R T
Southern Te
3809 Airport Drive
of
COPY
in & Res
earch search Laboratories, Inc. '=
[phone] • Fax: [phone] Wilson, NC 27896
SAMPLE No.: E8175-003
A N A L Y S I S Date Reported: 05/08/96
Greg Patterson
Biosun Inc.
6033 Wentworth Ave.
Minneapolis
Phone:[phone] X
MN 55419
Fax:
P. 0.:
Client Sample ID: BOSTIC PROJECT
Marks: Lagoon 41 Comp
Collected: 03/27/96 10:45
Received: 03/28/96 15:30 Matrix: WASTEWATER
Classification:
ENV
CAT No. ANALYSES
MDL
RESULT UNITS
EW-003 BOD (5-day)
EW-030.1 Nitrogen: Ammonia
NN)
29
406 mg/L
EW-030.2 Nitrogen: Kjeldahl((as
1.38
4"15 mg
EW-040 Solids: Total Dissolved
EW-040.1
0 70
438 mg/L
Solids: Total Suspended
EW-038.2
7
1,320 mg
J" "
Phosphorus: Total (as P)
5.00
320 mg/L
41.8 mg/L
/'�zLl /`� >
oC. 3 ) S lO/!/cJ//000
oa/
TKn - q39 PP �o 3 a7/ 9� / /d s ��N�/v00
���
g? .J.y
'
43£r�•.��x3S 3,cp(0
i•a'ea
gtJA ,00g>S _ 3.y7
_
.� (•3,yZ, d •S 3.(.G - T.47i
IhV4,,(e
COMMENTS
=`
Laboratory Contact(s):
Debbie Collins
Section Head, Water Qualitv
Page 3 of 8 E8175R.315
ewed and Approved by::
5 B. t_:ox �IIi, B.S.
ger, Environmental Dept.
(JP1:V2R07.2) 05/08/96
Chemical and Microbiological Analyses: Environmental • Industrial Hygiene • Agricbemical • Foods • Pharmaceuticals

■
_r
Grower: Kenneth, Bastie E.
PO Box 831
Beulaville, NC 28518
Soil Test Report Du II County
B/L9i9 )
SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS farm:
A` „Ire`djI line 00
rom..�,.,. ..,.- .
ommend.tpons„
Copies to: County Extensioh Direc,
Agriment Services Inc.
Sample No. Last Crop
KB1
Ho Yr TIA
Crop or Year
1st Crop: Berm Ilay/Pas,M
2nd Crop:
Li
2.5
N W KO
180-220 140-160 190-210
Mg Cu
$ 0
Zn B Mn See Note
0 $ 12
Test Results
Soil Class IIM% WIV CEC BS% Ac pll P-1 &-I
MIN 3.01 1.14 3.4 24.0 2.6 4.3 0 16
Ca% Mg%
16.o 6.0
Mn-1 Mn-Al (1) Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
10 15 27
Zn-Al
27
Cu-1 S-1 SS-1 NCs-N M&N Na
28 68 0.1

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 1
)DUCER: Kenneth Bostic
LOCATION: PO Box 831
Beulaville
i-LEPHONE: 910-298-5302
August 18, 1995
NC 28518
TYPE OPERATION: Wean to Feeder Swine
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 3552 pigs design capacity
Che waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified
-ate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant
iutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
:ommercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where waste
.s to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
imiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
:ycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
!utrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
nsure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
pply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
tent of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can
—line. Soil types are important as they have different infilitration
ates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
ater holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
roding at greater than 5 tons per acre*per year. With special pre-
tions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per
cre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
aining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
ay result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM
egulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
nd downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of the nutrients
or crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the
aste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
of more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
isking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
fte estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
ypical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage require -
ants should be based on the waste analysis eport from your waste
anagement facility. Attached you will find information on proper
ampling terchniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to
ze lab for analysis.
zis waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
Jr compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
anagement Commission.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 2
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
3 2 pigs x .40 tons waste/pigs/year = 1420.8 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
3`2 pigs x .48 lbs PAN/pigs/year = 1704.96 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
the following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
TABLE l: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL
CROP
CODE
YIELD
LBS
AW N
PER AC
COMM N
PER AC
0
0
**
ACRES
6.11
6.11
* LBS
AW N
USED
1558.05
305.5
APPLICATION TIME
April - Sept
Oct - Feb
70877 unlb McC be 5.1 255
70877 unlb McC sgp 1.0 50
TOTAL
15:
1863.55
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded.
I The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
chile meeting the N requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone
7anagement Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of NC to
lave a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
)lan only addresses Nitrogen.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 3
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate
land. see required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL
TYPE
CROP
CODE
YIELD
LBS
AW N
PER AC
COMM N
PER AC
**
ACRES
* LBS
AW N
USED
APPLICATION TIME
TOTAL
1
Indicates that this field is being overseeded.
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
** lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
'he following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
2ROP CODE
CROP
UNITS IPER UNIT
be Hybrid Bermudagrass - Controlled Grazed tons 150
sgp Small Grain Pasture tons 50
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES y LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1 !12.22 1863.55 /
TABLE 2
TOTAL ri2.22 1863.55
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED 1704.96
*** DEFICIT-158.59
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 4
Ar--es shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
u ole acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed will be more than the acres shown in
t tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic
land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be
nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production
facility will produce approximately 568.32 pounds of plant
available nitrogen per year in the sludge that will need to be
removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when broadcasting
the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well
special equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
T' irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of
tii= soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs.
This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure,
soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
am-unt should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the
s 1 at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen
applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage
and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6 months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure be within 1.7 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report
for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper
application rate prior to applying the.waste.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 5
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 6
Plans and Specifications
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, directapplication, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of'$10,00o per day by the Division
of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that
the producer either has owns or has long term access to adequate
land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer does not own
adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS
with a copy of a written agreement with a landowner who is within
a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility
to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is
a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of application for other nutrients.
Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource
Management System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System
(ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips
will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter
strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM.
(See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390
Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when the
wind is blowing.
When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally
tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops
or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in
the NRCS Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.
Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or
to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur
in order to control conditions conducive to odor or flies
and to provide uniformity of application.

_ (WASTE UTIL'II,2ATION: PLAN"
PAGE 7
8.
Animal, waste,shall...not be applied'to saturated. sbils,,'during
G"
rainfall- events,or when the surface is frozen: - --:----:'_-------'--_-
"
Animal waste shall.tbe applied on actively growing crops inj.:.,
such a manner that;no.more-than 20 to 25 percent of:.:the;leaf
area is,covered ;
^.
Waste nutrients shall not be applied.in•fall or winter for
"
spring planted crops on soils with 'a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils
should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover
crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a
crop on bare soil.
11.
Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to
surface water. This distance may be reduced for waters that
are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter strips
are present. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12.
Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13.
Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14.
Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other
property and public right -of ways.
1r.
Animal waste shall not be discharged'into surface wasters,
drainageways, or wetlands by discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site
by a "technical specialist°. Animal waste should not be
applied on grassed waterways that discharge into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the
application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16.
.Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into
the animal waste management system.
17.
Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures
must maintain a maximum operating level to provide adequate
storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in addition to
one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18.
A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments,
berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation
shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to
areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be
kept
mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures
should be inspected
regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage
or discharge.

M
?0.
WASTE ' UTIIII ZAT
ION :PLAN -
' PAGE
If animal production at the`facility.is to be suspended or
terminated; -the owner -is responsible for'
--
menting a:.".closure plan" which will,eliminate'the;possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and .erosion
was
handling.structures,?piping, pumps, reels,=etc should
be inspected;on a.regular basis to. prevent` breakdowns,:;'leaks,
and.spills.' A regular maintenance checklist should be.kept
on site..::.;

J Fr,t��+ h,tiaa
a WASTE UTILIZATION'PLAN+,
vain
v'
PAGEM9
. 1 ✓ rat +Lr r.�. !� to L
.,y.
-
-
4E OF FARM.. " "'trO
ZI
JER / MANAGER AGREEMENT
(we:=+t*.%=i a1Wi
)'.understand arid will follow and implement the.speeifioations, and
operation ;and maintenance proceduresestabhshed:in the approved
Y
_mal,waste_utilization plan for -the farm namee. d L.(we) kn
abovow
it any expansion to the existing, 'design .capacity::•of;:the waste
:atment.`facilities will require a new certification to be submitted
the Division
of Environmental Management (DEM) before the new
.mals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
;charge of animal
waste from this system to surface waters of the
to from a storm event less
severe than the 25 year, 24 hour storm.
approved plan will be filed on -site
at the farm office and at the
'ice of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will
available for review by DEM upon request.
we) understand that I must own or have access'to equipment,
marily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
cribed in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
ilable at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
urs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also
tify that the waste will be applied on the land according to
s plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
OF FACILITY OWNER: Kenneth Bostic
NATURE: DATE :
6 OF MANAGER (if different from owner):
please print
'NATURE
E OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST:
DATE:
Johnnv L. Lanier
LLIATION: Duplin Soil and Water Conservation District
2ESS (AGENCY): P. O. Box 277
Kenansville NC 28349
4ATURE : ^,C
DATE:

KFriT t-wi
Iv
1 4.1
ji
4.
A.7
Vt.

AGRIMENT SERVICES INC.
P.O. BOX 1096
BEULAVILLE NC 28518
[phone]
June 4, 1996
Mr. Shannon Langley
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section -Operations Branch
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Dear Mr. Langley,
JUN 10 1996
REULAD
JUN 6 1996
FACILITIES ASSESSMENT UNIT
Enclosed is a revised Waste Utilization Plan that 1 have prepared for Kenneth Bostic.
The plan reflects the recommendations that were made on 6/3/96.by the Wilmington
Regional Personnel. The old waste plan dated 8/18/95 included the 401 exemption area
as part the spray field, the new plan does not include this area it only reflects the areas
that are in the best condition to receive waste. There will be several Best Management
Practices that accompany the new waste plan and these are noted in the narrative section
of the Waste Utilization Plan and in further detail by the aerial photo included. If you
have any questions about the plan or anything pertaining to the site feel free to contact
me any time.
With Kind Regards,
onnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Vice -President Operations
Agriment Services Inc.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
DATE JUNE 4, 1996
Producer: KENNETH BOSTIC
Location: P.O. BOX 831
BEULAVILLE NC 28518..
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: WEAN TO FEEDER
Number of Animals: 3552
Page 1
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant
nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can
utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre-
cautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per
acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM
regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of the nutrients
for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this
is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you
choose to inject the waste in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating waste are
not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage require-
ments should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste
management facility. Attached you will find information on proper
sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to
the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Page 2
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (GALLONS, FT31 TONS, ETC.)
3552 hogs x 0.4 tons waste/hogs/year = 1420.8 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
3552 hogs x 0!48 PAN/hogs/year = 1704.96 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS COMM N ** * LBS
DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW
PER AC AC USED
5817 1 MCC
5817 -1 MCC
58172 AuB
5817 3 MCC
5817 -3 MCC
PA.Sy✓+ 'e-,77i'n
f� I�
69
SG
rT 2 4-1-
6-T 300
yl T 50 W
W (GC45 90 V
L
BH �yl�6 % 300
SG 50 /14
kv .f-
lan 1, :. &IJ Aff
3.38
APPLIC.
TIME
1014
3.38
169
2.5
225
1.73
519
1.73
86.5
0
.0--'
.FD Pj
n - .
iT I
alb 0
s�;t�• 0.
Total 2013.5
k4
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: TUe applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while.me&ting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone
Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of NC to
have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses Nitrogen.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Page 3
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate
land. See required specifications 2.)
TRACT FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD
LBS
COMM
-N** * LBS
DETERMINING PHASE CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES AW
PER AC
AC
USED
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
0
Indicates
that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted)
or winter
annuals.follow summer annuals.
** Acreage
figures may exceed total acreage in
fields
due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal
waste nitrogen) equals total
required
nitrogen
less any
commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1
and 2 above:
LBS N
APPLY
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
MONTH
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
APR-SEPT
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
.:
MAR-JUNE
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEED
AC
50
SEPT-NOV
SA
SUMMER ANNUALS
AC
110
APR -MAY
WA
WINTER ANNUALS
AC
100
SEPT-NOV
BC
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-CON GRAZED
TONS
50
APR-SEPT
BP
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-PASTURE
TONS
50
APR-SEPT
FC
TALL FESCUE -CON GRAZED
TONS
50
SEPT-APR
FH
TALL FESCUE -HAY
TONS
50
SEPT-APR
FP
TALL FESCUE -PASTURE
TONS
50
SEPT-APR
SB
SOY BEANS
BUSHELS
4
JUN-SEPT
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2
FEB-MAR

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1 '7 0 2013.5
TABLE 2 0 0
TOTAL 7-6 J 2013.5
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED 1704.96
*** BALANCE
-308.54
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fullyutilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required_ buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
Page 4
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic
land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be
nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production
facility will produce approximately pounds of plant
available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the sludge that will need to be
removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when broadcasting
the sludge equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
waste water.
". APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of
the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs.
This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure,
soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the
soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen
applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage
and the temporary storage must.be removed on the average of once every
6 months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure be within 1.7 feet of the top of the dike.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 5
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to
ensure that an -irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the
acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates
and amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid
Call your Agriment Services representative for assistance —in determinini
the amount of waste per acre and the proper�tapplication rate
prior to beginning the application of your `d4a;te,r.-, 13d V, 'les
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:
07
.!�►+�n�:���
L ..�
0q-

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Page 6
Plans and Specifications
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division
of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Local NRCS office must have documentation in the design folder that
the producer either owns or has long term access to adequate land
to properly dispose of waste. If the producer does not own adequate
land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy
of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable
proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application
for the life expetancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an updated Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in
the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management
System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS
is used the soil loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per
year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves
the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers"
required by DEM. (See FOTG Standard 393-Filter Strips and Standard
390 Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it
will be soil incorporated.on conventionally tilled cropland. When
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in
the MRCS Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infil-
tration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface
waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during
application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
event, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that no more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 7
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
Planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum
and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up releassed
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to
planting of a crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface
water. This distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial
provided adequate vegetative filter strips are present. (See standard
393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the landowner.
1.4. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right -of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by discharge or by -over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted wetlands provided they have been
approved as a land application site by a "techinal specialist".
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
into water courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the
application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain
a maximum operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year,
24-hour storm event in addition to one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on
all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.).
If needed, special vegetation shall be provided for these areas and
and shall be fenced, as necessary to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are
limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be;<_
kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure
plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge,
pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills..1.1, -
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
NAME OF FARM: BOSTIC FARM
OWNER / MANAGER AGREEMENT
Page 8
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above.
I (we) know that an expansion to the existing design capacity of
the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management (DEM) before the new animals
are stocked. I (we) alsounderstand that there be no discharge
of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state
from a storm event less severe than the 25 year, 24 hour storm.
The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at
the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and
will be available for review by DEM upon request.
I (we) understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also
certify that the waste will be applied on the land according to
this plan at the appropriate times and at rate that no runoff
occurs.
NAME OF FACILIITTY OWNER: KENNET OSTIC
SIGNATURE.
DATE: 4 b
NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner):
SIGNATURE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST
DATE
RONNIE G. KENNEDY JR.
AFFILIATION: Agriment Services Inc.
P.0 Box 1096
ul will 28 1
SIGNATURE• ZGG

y "Ty i'�9Fs ... 4S' : y�- i -yam. ✓,e iS p/ '` ♦ '�.S,e .
Y h
-
�. t

IIj3S'SZ
�A1�A.� T� Ft��c-sZ 3.3 a�
�1 zquc� —[A-)
L I �/a� s q 14
II�-yy)^7A
/c J2
1 !/*� (N4�NbL.�s /� �• � � X i SS � � Ci t 1 .i � !� Qk..+..�i3
,�11'
(II
�i
Ii�xcsss uvo % ,.ZO gr.f�w....t/o/
1a--��i�
r
iiI
(I
� �✓ � �/r � Kr'
a
I�
l_4�J�� C�(� �' �� � �. �D 7� � � � b0e1 c�.-/ 1��3_✓J ��l' � � �i7 DGil3 S �//ZCoq ���/U71�%�,�!"
1�III
%A) _tT6N�----��—
iIl
D. s X 3• O S 3-G z- 3, ZG =
I - . F/ obi
3-2�-9G

'7 1,3�i4c�-:-�,-(Z`,�c5"
�.�� v,'.�. 4e... ,l. k✓_�' _ �StWC-
�til I +3 YVIF L vhr e�_E- - P> Ily f=1o�.s�o -J.C
1
` -ails ZS6 lb �},ST i1��C.� N1crvNn/Craven
eL
I,J Iov� 1s 3o b'
I�R O.-Sx 99.,G:3`
1 - y +-
�t�a_
Zfsv�'-.5. D` G�
o rA.cc�r-.• - .ate '� , .` T4__ e �.
fit, � - r :-+-—�—r—•-- t } l i i i i
-~• �- � / [y/ 1 '--ems �-�,j .!- � _ L_ '.- �;p t �. t � .�
�.� '� �.. `�f 1� D ' O Y _.�—• • f �L y �,.. 2. �i.'U t / OTP:v ..%,.O �i e— iA
uLN - - - ,- arty.
-
_ YLIe✓1�rKum �LAN�- ;q2F�� :Q.�c,v,rfP.j _ `'.+ r1., .L.- _ -
rt
_ - -
S (� U
5
'�vtGl pro�c,�u9 Gr�u,r� _ /0lai5"(aO15X 0..
+X 3GSa� _777�8:
z?71
r rtR — r-f
F + .A'LYGSL o` JLAo•:�D �QR• -i"1 r
N,•�
-y
I e '
i .-�_ __- :.-,-r .-.-'' , , 1-a.�-t- i 1�--:•-1 -i-. �'I � _ _ --• -ram.-, , -
J
r f. SV?90�'Y FJ.McR Vt. °li rOGYf5 H9SiPV[D � Of0.d M1n.�Hfi-�

AL0086 SOIL I NTERPRETAT IONS RECORD NARVYN SERIES
(,.j CAPABILITY AND REALISTIC YIELDS PER ACRE OF CROPS AND PASTURE (FOR NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLANS)
CLASS-
OETERMINING
PHASE
CAPA-, CO ON CORN PEANUTS SOYBEANS MPROV D ALL
BI LITY LINT BERMUOAGRSS FESCUE
(LB S) (BU,,_ (LBS) (BU) (TONS/ACRE) (TONS/ACRE)
N RA IRR. N1RR JIRR. INIRR JIRR.NIRR JIRR. INIRR JIRR. I KAY JGRAZEJ MAY IGRAZE
0-2
1
B00
75
2500
50
6.0
5.1
3.8
3.2
2-6%
2E
750
70
2300
45
6-10%
3E
650
60
2000
35
10-15%
4E
500
50
1600
25
Rev. February 2, 1994

NCO113 SOIL INTERPRETATIONS RECORD AUTRYVILLE SERIES
CAPABILITY AND REALISTIC YIELDS PER ACRE OF CROPS AND PASTURE (FOR NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLANS)
C SS- CAPA- MACC0 SOYB S CO ON P U CORN MPROY
DETERMINING BILITY LINT BERMUOAGRSS
PHASE (LBS) (BU# (LBS) (LBSj (BU) (TONS/ACRE)
N RR IRR. NIRR IRR. NIRR IRR. INIRR JIRR. INIRR JIRR. INIRR JIRR. I HAY IGRAZE
ALL 2S 2200 25 600 3000 7 4.
Rev. February 2, 1994

Environmental Chemists, Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE:
SHIPPING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1037
[phone] (Office)
6602 Windmill Way
CONSULTING Wrightsville Beach,
(910) 3924)-M (Lab)
Wilmington.
CHEMISTS North Carolina 28480
[phone] (I =)
North Carolina 28405
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
YTme.lT •� C�.,;fM mC.t� )�m� DATx SAaK[D: le Il�`t to
SAUK= BY.
Rommy To: A; , S1 ;
Vb-s r N✓ - •J s*; l L2A C; \
t'jNa -rJ
r�
—n1
�'337 S
('j t\
-Z ti 7-4N
i'Gn) ?fiefs I( .00'o3 : -'
!'s)tJ : f1 r A)II;ld # 0,5 N3
y 1� S" / 3 .zG. 4 D• S_ (3.60 , 3. 2G) i.c s t O./a
DATE Of Reran:
A O. 1.
Reov 0. 31 I'7
0-v0 S-w(
Tee. t✓/o L v 0.

s*
N iS ZS%
/L) j l�N- JV/Is�i + rv.�jA;7
A///
�":' l ' uo-5 ;W 6-L

05BETM � Environmental Chemists, Inc.
JAL 0 3 1996 !JJ
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: SHIPPING ADDRESS:
,O. Box 1037 [phone] (Office) 6602 Windmill Way
CONSULTING Wrightsville Beach, [phone] (Lab) Wilmington,
CHEMISTS North Carolina 28480 [phone] (Fax) North Carolina 28405
REPORT OF ANAL YSSS
Customer: NCDEHNR - DEM
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, N.C. 28405
Date Sampled: 06/12/96
Sampled By: David Holzinger
Report To: Rick Shiver
WASTEWATER: Bostic Lagoon
Date of Report: 07/01/96
P.O.#:
Report #: 3117
PARAMETER
LAB ID#
Ammonia Nitrogen, NH -N mg/L
391
Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen, NO +NO -N mg/L
0.09
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, TKN mg/L
434
Total Phosphorus, P mg/L
4.28
Copper, Cu mg/L
0.235
Cadmium, Cd mg/L
<0.010
Lead, Pb mg/L
0.037
Nickel, Ni mg/L
0.076
Zinc, 2n mg/L
0.271

t
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
MALL.ING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1037
Wriehtsvillr'Beach,
North
TELEPHONE:
[phone] (Office)
[phone] (Lab)
(910) 392- 4424 (Fax)
CHAIN OF CUSTODY FOR SA-14PLE COLLECTION
Client:
Collected By (signature & print) :, DAVID HuLSINGER �
SHIPPING ADDRESS:
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington,
North Carolina 28405
Report #: 3
Sample Type: Influent, Effluent,Well, Stream, Soil, Other �i¢Grroyt/ _
Collection: For composite Indicate Date & Time for Start & Finish
Location &
Identification
Sample
Type
Collection
Date Time
Bottle
ID
Lab
ID
Analysis
Requested
6-IZ-9(p
PA
'L .�i0�
331sq
)143 WO I's 7 r
/Vtf7�2��=�'S -FP
-17
Of P-Ti4LS
i
Transfe Relinquished By Date/Time Received By
Date/Time
1
2
Proper. Preservative Used: Acid, Base Other
Received On Ice or Chilled to 4°Cc Yes/ C�-- No
Accepted Rejected By (A-- Comment
Comments n(�
__. Delivered By PReceived By
Date 19 -17- -9 la Time 3! iSP '

i
n
m m
n
a `o
m
m-
m
m C
r
10 i «
r
G E
0 U "
Ln
Nw m
M U N
m
0
•y m
N O
V ` C C
V
fat OUP
�C1zoo
M1
•o SQIVDFR: - - '
0. Omplare items 1 entl/or Z for emotional services.
m ! Complete items 3, entl 4a & b.
I also wish to receive the
' print Your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can
rota::+ thus card tp Yuv. following services Ifor an extra m • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on fee):
m does not permit. the back if space
.i. Write"Return Receipt Requested-, the mail iece 1' Addressee's Address m
The Return Receipt will show to p helm^' the article number. N
C •eretl,
whom the article was delivered and the date _
2. ❑Restricted Delivery 0 i v I, �le Addressed td; Consult postmaster for fee. m
m �!/rl C/�/, U
o % 4a. Atticle Number
/-3j
�U
y _ O. Service Type o21
te
�,/pe9isred El Insured R
US o„ td�Cettified ❑ CODCO
✓�z-C� •1 a�J y��j ❑ Exp ress Mail ❑ 7
Return Receipt for C
C 7. Date of Deliv ry Merchanse
j 5• Sig re (Addres eel I — �
¢F- 8. A dressee's Address (Only if requested Y
6. Signature (Agent)and tee is paid)
m
o f
PS Form 3811, December 1991 nu.s. GPO; t
aszau
- IPT %

J
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr. Division of Environmental Management Jonathan B. Howes
Governor Water Quality Section Secretary
November 1, 1995
Certified Mail # Z 405 591 360
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Kenneth Bostic
P.O. Box 831
Beulaville, N.C. 28518
• Subject: Kenneth Bostic
NC HWY 111
Facility Number 31-182
Duplin County
Dear W. Bostic:
On October 27, 1995, staff from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Environmental
1.1amgcnient inspected your animal operation and the lagoon serving this operation. It was observed that
although approximately two feet of freeboard existed in the lagoon, that inadequate land is available for
spray irrigation of waste. The field containing the reel and gun is only approximately two acres in size
and did not contain a winter cover crop. This office responded to a compliant in which local residents
were concerned over odor and the fact that spray was entering onto their property. Further investigation
revealed that the fields behind the lagoons were cleared for irrigation purposes, however the cleared area
appears to be wetlands, and in fact were ponded with rainwater at the time of the investigation. It is
recommended that you contact a technical specialist, or local NRCS office personnel to assist you in
determining spray irrigation area required for the farm.
To remain a deemed permitted facility, corrective actions must begin within seven (7) days. Failure
to do so may result in the facility losing the deemed permitted status, requiring a, certified waste
management plan and certification form for the facility to be submitted prior to the December 31, 1997
deadline, and being required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility.
•

r
Mr. Kenneth Bostic
November 1, 1995
Page 2
•
•
0
Please be aware it is a violation of North Carolina General Statutes to discharge wastewater to the
surface waters of the State without a permit. The Division of Environmental Management has the authority
to levy a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 per day per violation.
When the required corrective actions are complete, please notify this office in writing at the address
below. I you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Mr. Mike Williams, or Mr. Rick
Shiver at [phone].
Sincerely,
"Mchael F. Williams
Environmental Specialist II
MW:31182.NO5
cc: Dave Adkins Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Duplin County Health Department
Tom Jones - NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Operations Branch

J
PLAN cDP.^=?iCAT_C:: 2CA NOP. a?;2rFyi
Plaza rftm i� the cc:.p l.ted foz3 to tSa Dlv'_s''_on of P�vironnenCaY"L�an�eyt,� ,_,
tha ad=-aaa oa -'n. ravara. ■iee of t::Lia -ca- U�1 „- IiJ-•
i; awe of ia� (Please print) : �F,JK 6T"+! �o3T/G _
Phone No. ..:'._-. ,o'"Z
ounty- .D✓OG.lN r .: 3`f 31Y67
Farm location: Lac_tude and Long i cude; 3�C&L'�°/.%�'Q��/"(required) Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.): suL/NE 77.
Design capacity (nu -^.per of anisals) : .3,5w7---
Average size of operation'('2 month population avg.):_Z-
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres):. 7. ,3
a.a ............ ace--------------- ............a.cv.vva==a=a:=va
T.cti--icalz Specialist Cnr'titication
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to i5A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new or
expanded anima! waste management system as installed for the £arm naamed above
has a--i a^.imal waste management plan_ that meets the design, constructicn,
operation and maintenance standards -and specifications of the Division of
nviron^_ental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Cc=ission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
i5A NCAC 6- .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria een_yerified by me or other designated teclanical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party) ; access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm.
Noma of Techaioa
Affiliaticn:�_c
Address (Agency)
Signature: �OLJ -1-7, Date: /bL z�;7X
a===a a ova=..a..a=.ace............... a.....aa.saaaa.aaav:aaaavva.a.
cw•..'.er/ma=afar Ate,--ea=a+t
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established. in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farce named above and will im?l=earit
these procedures. I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan, will be filed at the farm —and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
"a.^..a of Laced
�Ow::ar (Please Print) :��(' �/rArt -f� ResA C'
'Signature: /'l�-z o��+ycL� Date:
Name of Hanagar, if different from owner (Please print)
Signature: Date:
!cote: A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer'.
DE4 USE ONLY:ACNEW#;EfS%
31- [$a

a' L
mm
11
V)
w
D
0
0 u
q
i
0 VV C 0
-4

REGISTRATION FORM FOR ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPER TTOO ' r
Department of Environment, Health and Natural R (-Z�6urce,0F
D ivisio 'Na
er Quality Se LionManagement g; q/,N_ C"go
a '
Q'i
If the animal waste management system for your feedlot 6 ,ration
designed to serve more than or equal to 100 head of Ct'LG74�
horses, 250 swine, 1,000 sheep, or 30,000 birds that are ser by
a liquid waste system, then this form must be filled out and mailed
Oece-ber 31 _: 3
�l pursuant to i5:, NCAC 2H.0217(c) in order to be
deemed permitted by DEM. Please print clearly.
Farm Name: j365t/< -S zaiy�
Mailing Address:
Cou
Owner(s) Nam
Manager(s) N
Lessee Name:
z
'7
Farm Location (Be as specific as possible: road names, direction, �`,-C4
Latitude/Longitude if known:
Design capacity of animal waste manag meat system (Number and type
of confined animal(s)): Do Z; S
Average animal
raised):
lation on the farm (Number and type of animal(s)
_P; 0 5
Year
Production Began: eqI2 ASCS Tract No.:
z)
Type
of waste Management System
Used:­_S(21d.,5d S.
Siii:itn
Acres Available for Land
Owner(s) Signature(s):
li_c_aptionnof waste: q
'DATE: /^4_'9-3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
I nJ-- S. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 17, 1994
Kenneth Bostic
P.O. Box 831
Beulaville NC 28518
Dear Mr. Bostic:
This is to inform you that your completed registration form required by the recently
modified nondischarge rule has been received by the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM), Water Quality Section.
On December 10, 1992 the Environmental Management Commission adopted a water
quality rule which governs animal waste management systems. The goal of the rule is for
animal operations to be managed such that animal waste is not discharged to surface waters
of the state. The rule allows animal waste systems to be "deemed permitted" if certain
minimum criteria are met (15A NCAC 2H .0217). By submitting this registration you have
met one of the criteria for being deemed permitted
We would like to remind you that existing feedlots which meet the size thresholds
listed in the rule, and any new or expanded feedlots constructed between February 1, 1993
and December 31, 1993 must submit a signed certification form (copy enclosed) to DEM by
December 31, 1997. New or expanded feedlots constructed after December 31, 1993 must
obtain signed certification before animals are stocked on the farm. Certification of an
approved animal waste management plan can be obtained after the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission adopts rules later this year.
We appreciate you providing us with this information. If you have any question about
the new nondischarge rule, please contact David Harding at [phone].
P.O. Box 29535. Rdeigh, North Carorina 27626.0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affvmafive Action Employer W%recycled/ 10%postconvmer paper

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
FOR
Kenneth Bostic
P.O. Box 831
Beulaville NC 28518
April 22, 1994
Your animal waste utilization plan has been specifically
developed for your 3552 INEAN TO FEEDER SWINE operation.
The plan is based on the sci'_ types, crops to be grown, and
method of application for your particular operation. The waste
must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the
animal waste should be used to reduce .the amount of commercial
fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied. This waste_ utilization elan uses nitrogen as
the limiting nutrient. Wash should be analyzed before_ each
application and annual soil tests are encouracec so that all
olant nutrients and lime can be balanced for realistic yield
of the crops to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value
of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environ-
mentally safe mariner. Always apply waste based on the needs
of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste.
The amount of available nitrogen for plant use is dependant on
the method of application. Soil type is important due to
different leaching potential and yield potential. waste shall
not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre
per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land
when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may
result in runoff to surface waters. Wind cbnditions should
also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems.
To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop orcduction and
reduce the potential for pollution, waste should be applied to
a growing crop or not more than 30 days prior to planting.
Soil incorporation of the waste will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste are based on
typical nutrient content f r this type of fac_lit_v. Annual
acreage recuirements mav_ be more or less dec_end_ne on the
specific waste analysis report for your faci__ty at the time
of _rrigation.

Your waste utilization plan is based on the following:
TABLE A. AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
NUMBER OF TONS WASTE PER TONS WASTE
ANIMALS TYPE OF ANIMALS 1000 ANIMALS PER YEAR
-------------------------------------------------------------
3552 WEAN TO FEEDER 400 1420.8
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE B. SUMMARY OF CROPS BY FIELD
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRACT
FIELD
----
SOIL
-AuB---
ACRES
CROP
CROPCODE
5817
2
2------
-HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS HAY-------
-BH-----
5817
3
AuB
3.9
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS HAY
BH
70877
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
AuB
1.39
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
BH
TABLE C. SUMMARY OF CROPS, YIELD, AND NUTRIENT REQUIREMENTS BY SOIL TYPE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CROP SOIL YIELD UNITS TOTAL N *TOTAL-P *TOTAL-K
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS HAY JAUB 15.5 TONS 1275 10 140 - 160
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Total phosphate and potash amounts should be confirmed with a soil test.
TABLE D. WASTE MANAGEMENT BY FIELD
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CROP
WASTE APPL
TYPE
WASTE N
COMM N
MONTHS TO APPLY
TRACT
FIELD
CODE
METHOD
WASTE
LB/AC
LB/AC
ANIMAL WASTE
5817
2
BH
---------
IRRIGATE
-------
SWINE
--------
275
-------
0
------------
APRIL TO OCT
5817
3
BH
IRRIGATE
SWINE
275
0
APRIL TO OCT
70877
1
BH
IRRIGATE
SWINE
275
0
APRIL TO OCT

The acres, crops, ann ,.pplication method shown i(,,-he preceding tables will
accommodate approximately 4176.5 animals of the type shown in Table A.
If more commercial fertilizer is used than is shown in Table D, then
additional acres of land will be needed. A 10 - 25 feet wide permanent
grass filter strip should be seeded along all ditches in fields that
receive animal waste.
The acres shown in Table B are the usable acres in the field shown. Usable
acres are the acres that must be able to receive animal waste. Buffer areas
along ditches, houses, property lines, etc. have been subtracted from the
total field acreages to arrive at the usable acres. The total acres shown
on the attached map is needed for land application in order to have the
proper buffer areas. A combination of land application equipment or
irrigation equipment may be needed in order to properly land apply waste to
all parts of the fields listed. It is the responsibility of the producer to
acquire whatever equipment is needed to properly land apply the waste.
ADDITIONAL
Prepared by: Title �C S
Concurred in by:�Date
Producer

U. S. Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
NC-ENG-34
September 1980
File Code: 210
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
Landowner LeA.,+H (jai+; c' County b,,021;,,
Community or Group No. Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam //.0 Ft. Length of Flood Pool Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation /0 -ik - 9 3
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. E ev. st. evation
Kind of :Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length: Width: Slope: .Land Use Improvements Above :Floodwater Above
:Flood Plain: Flood Plain
:...Ft, Ft. % Ft. Ft.
1
2
3
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach /�,�,;, ,�,, ^ {, -y,�- _ L
V J �
Hazard Classification of Dam W, b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classification 0, II, III, IV, V)
0
e
Concurred By
name 7� itle ,.
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date 6- 9 zf
Date l //- 5

uun Liqu d /
l PSWCD 2
G. Lagoon Liquid - —
l. Collect approximately 1/2 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from the
inflow pipe to the flush tanks.
2. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on the end of a 10-15
foot long pole.
b. Extend the bottle 10-15 feet away from the bank edge.
c. Brush away any floating scum or debris so it is not collected
with sample. -
d. Submerge the bottle within 1 foot of the liquid surface.
e. Repeat at approximately 5 locations around the lagoon, place
into a bucket, thoroughly mix, and empty 1 pint into sample
container.
3. From a multi -stage lagoon system collect sample from lagoon that
is going to be irrigated from. ,
II. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place the sample for analysis into a flexible or expandable container that
can be sealed. .The container should be rinsed clean with water and free
of any residues but should not be chlorinated or treated in any other way.
Dry litter may also be placed in sealed plastic bag such as a freezer bag.
B. The sample should be refrigerated, iced or cooled, if possible, or trans-
ferred to the lab immediately.
C. Hand -delivery is the most reliable way of sample transfer, but it can also
be mailed.
D. If mailed, sample container should first be protected with a packing material
such as newspaper, then boxed or packaged with wrapping paper and taped.
E. The NCDA Plant Analysis -Lab provides this service for a -nominal fee of
$4 per sample which should be forwarded along with the sample.
1. Address: N. C. Department of Agriculture
Plant Analysis Lab
Agronomic Division
Blue Ridge Road Center
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell

" r PSWCD 1
1. Address: N. C. Department of Agriculture
Plant Analysis Lab
Agronomic Division
Blue Ridge Road Center
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
F. Request that as a minimum the following analyses be performed:
1. Total nitrogen (TKN)
2. Ammonia nitrogen (NH N)
"3. Total phosphorus .(TP)
4. Potassium .(K)
5. Dry litter samples should also include a total solids (TS) analysis.
G. Other analyses performed at no extra cost by NCDA include trace minerals.

} L 1.{.-I{'A'N4 �{ -
'y d 1
YS i S 4 S �• ,'!'.rtY I�2 ?w!. �yj L p T f i.
1 L :.
z •
r
s9 41
'f
t
CARROLL'SFOODS; =1NC.
.
r 1S b q �i
P. O. Orowei 866 .. .-
y
WARSAW. NORTWCAROLINA 28398
FACILITY DESIGN AND
WASTE
MANAGEMENT PLAN
FARM
NAME OR NUMBER`t-
0
FARMDESCREPTION 177(� ADt71T1ont -M ISTITl6 1776 NOASsk
-T6TA(- 3SSZ H-GAD XUe)EK4
LOCATION OWN y fl I .2- NktLe-S N OF JP)E U( AVtLl.6
,k)o P L tr-c Co -
COMPANY FARM
CONTRACT GROWER ✓

" ✓ M1
S t
r
UI04
b
_ysa
ABOUT LAGOON. CONSTAVCTION
<e0k e.i< H Zaosl c A iob' 1Tl or(
Listed below is a brief summary of volumes and otherdawa (See contents of Plan for more
information)
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS 3 1 oZ cubic yards
EXCAVATIO`i cubic yards
FILL (pad & dike) cubic yards
TOP SOIL (minimum 3• thick) SIC)' C 2S)(3c`); 27 14?- cubic yards
CLAY LINER (represents a complete liner if required) 94- 5 cubic yards
Constructed top of dam must include a minimum of 5% settlement - EXAMPLE: 10 feet high
dam will require 5% of 10 feet or 0.5 feet fill above planned top of dam.
Clay content, thickness and .compaction of liners (if required) are very important. If the
certifying technical specialist is unable to approve the liner with normal field techniques, an
independent engineering analysis will be required (see CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS for
additional information). If independent engineering analysis is required, this expense will be the
responsibility of the owner/grower.
Special attention needs to be given to the seeding specifications. The lagoon dike must be seeded
according to specifications before the system can be certified and stocked with animals. (Consult
with your SCS Conservationist regarding mulching).
i� Ja-oMES Rorr -DOE Ta W0944- LM PfLoGKc-55

ATTENTION OWNER AND EARTH MOVING CONTRACTOR
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE REVIEWING THE ATTACHED WASTE
MANAGMENT PLAN.
This design has been prepared in accordance with USDA Soil Conservation standards and
properly installed will allow certification and stocking of animals. The following items
should be discussed PRIOR to entering into a contract:
1. This design is in compliance with state and federal laws. Any changes in design may
result in non-compliance and failure to be eligible for certification. No animals can
be stocked until the lagoon construction is approved and certified to the Division of
Environmental Management (DEM).
2. This design has taken into account data including soils, topography, wetlands,
streams, dwellings, wind direction, and owners concerns.
3. The volume shown represents excavation and fill in the lagoon and pad area. It
does NOT account for cut/fill for liners, roads, borrow areas, drainage or other
related construction activities unless specifically covered in the design.
4. Typically, the excavation volume represents the bulk of earthwork and is used for
price negotiations. All earth work beyond this amount will be worked out between
the owner and contractor, CARROLUS DOES NOT NEGOTIATE PRICES FOR
GROWERS.
5. It is the desire of Carroll's Foods that the contractor receives a fair price for earth
work and the land owner receives a properly constructed lagoon and pad that will
meet design requirements.
6. DO NOT' MAKE ANY CHANGES TO THE DESIGN OR FARM LAYOUT
UNLESS THE ORIGINAL DESIGNER IS CONSULTED AND APPROVES.
CARROLUS FOODS ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY
DEVIATION FROM ORIGINAL DESIGN OR CHANGES MADE ON THE SITE
BY CONTRACTOR OR ANYONE OTHER THAN CARROLUS PERSONNEL.

" P.O. Qraw
WARSAW,NORTH(
MEMORANDUM
TO: All Prospective Contract Growers
FROM: Don Butler, Real Estate Manager
Howard Hobson, Resource Conservationist
RE: Legal requirements for swine growers in
North Carolina and how they relate to you
VA 28398
4• FS
1 �.
d..
F
J �
y
t tie Y 4
}
The facility design and waste management plan attached is of the utmost
importance to you and to Carroll's. This plan must be approved by a technical specialist
with USDA Soil Conservation Service prior to construction start. The lagoon must be
constructed exactly as designed unless changes are approved by the original designer and
SCS personnel. The approved plan needs to become a part of your permanent records
and must be readily available for review if and when your farm is inspected by state
regulatory personnel.
When earthwork and lagoon construction is complete and the top of the dike and
outside slopes of the lagoon has been graded, seeded, and fertilized it must pass a final
inspection by SCS personnel in order for your farm to be certified ready to stock
animals. At the time of final construction approval the grower and the person certifying
construction must sign a document called Certification for New or Expanded Animal
Feedlots (a blank of this form is enclosed in your package) and this form must be sent "
to the Department of Environmental Health and Natural Resources in Raleigh. Copies
of the signed document should be kept in your permanent file, one copy goes to SCS for
their file, and a copy must be presented to Carroll's Foods before any animals can be
placed on your farm. The owner is responsible for the Certification being completed
and sent to the appropriate places. Remember, No Certification -- No Animals.
If you have any questions about any of the above information please contact one
of us by calling 910-293-3434, extension 246.

Hec
y` Divisi
Jonathan B."Howes': Secietl
A. Preston Howard, Jr.' P.E.,
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CERTIFICATION OF APPROVED ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT' PLANS FOR
NEW OR EXPANDED ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS SERVING FEEDLOTS
In order to be deemed permitted by the Division -of. -Environmental Management
(DEM), the owner of any. new or expanded ariislal waste management system
constructed after January 1, 1994 which is designed to serve greater than or
equal to the animal populations listed below is required to submit a signed
certification form to DEM before the new animals are stocked on the farm.
Pasture operations are exempt from the requirement to be certified.
100 head of cattle
75 horse.
250 swine
1,000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid waste' system
The certification must be signed by the owner of the feedlot (and manager if
different from the owner) and by any technical specialist designated by the Soil
and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. A
technical specialist must verify by an on -site inspection that all applicable
design and construction standards and specifications are met as installed and
that all applicable operation and maintenance standards and specifications can
be met.
Although the actual number of animals at the facility may vary from time to time,
the design capacity of the waste handling system should be used to determine if
a farm is subject to the certification requirement. For example, if the waste
system for a feedlot is designed to handle 300 hogs but the average population
will be 200 hogs, then the waste management system requires a certification.
This certification is required by regulations governing animal waste management
systems adopted by the Environmental Management Commission (EMC) on December 10,
1992 (Title 15A NCAC 2H .0217).
L•1`+.�i
On the reverse side of this page is the certification fore which must be
submitted to DEM before new animals are stocked on the farm. Assistance in
completing the form can be obtained from one of the local agricultural agencies
such as the soil and water conservation district, the USDA -Soil Conservation
Service; or the N.C. Cooperative Extension Service. The fora should be sent to:
Department of Environment, Health and
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section, Planning Branch
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535
Phone: [phone]
Form ID: ACNEW0194
Natural Resources
Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
Date:
P.O. Box 29535. Rcleigh, North Carokn i27626-0535 Telephone [phone] . FAX [phone]a96
An Equal Opportunity Atirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10%posTconv er pcoer

-
e. 4.. { 'x •r � L,, x �J
ANI2l,1L WASTB ?SANAGII�iT PLAN C8ATIYIGTION Y A NEit OR )SSPADiDED Y S`'"'n-'%ix i '
Y_ -S ..: �3k d �ayy 4p, �''�shY��'c",'''� �.: "x;,. �' :-L �isri;F, �z �j� Zs '�,t � x, r a �yEP„�D <LOTS��,., t. i� `� • -
��.
Pleasi ratu'=n-th�.�compl.Ged�torm to4
4th.rDivisioa o! Saoiroria.atal;llaaazemaat.at„;r
thaddresi 'oa tho'revera. sides "o'!
e,
Name of farm (Please'p=int) :�EIVw/ETNtlBGS77C
Address: " O. ` 8 -
.2851 Phone No: ds98 `4ssc7 .OP 9.b Zq ,Z
Cc t;nty�- i.v „..
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude: 46 IM lZe ¢z 1° (required), Also, r
Please attach a copy of a county road map with locationidentified.
Type of operation -(swine, layer, dairy, etc.):
Design capacity (number of animals): -d
Average size of operation (12 month population avg.):. .31&
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres): �. 3
aaaaaavaafaaaasaaaavvaavaaaaaavavaaaaafata aseaserial[��asaaaaaaasaavaaaavaaaivaa
Technical Specialist Certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil.and Water
.Conservation Commission pursuant to i5A NCAC 6F .000S• I certify that the new or
expanded animal waste management system as installed for the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design• construction,
operation and maintenance standards -and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
i5A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005..The following elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria-haue been verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
ara included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party) ; access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 2S-year, 24-hour
storm.
Name of Technical specialist (Please Print) : art/A,Q L. A( "O,y
Affiliation: i/ C C.
Address (Agency) : / /.yA.�C' D.Pd'/®G SJ� /LYan/� . Phone N 'i IC a.7 ilcA .
Signature:_��sL fag+-- Date: 4ZZ4&�L
aeaaaaaavv....ariaala..ariaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaavasavaaaava.... aavvaasasa
owaer/manager Agreement
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or .through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
Name of Land Owaar (Please Print) : ���� -•-%'fir %�f• sir
Signature: /� ,-„ o .�/c Date- -I�F- 9-F
Hama of XS ager, if different from owner (Please print):
Signature: Date:
Note: A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer..
DEM USE. ONLY:ACNEWR

wlV
P' O rBOX 277.: s r
^^+ united states
So ly
+ ;
' f Depey m et of
CAgricultur�°"°ce
Tole hone 9 9 296 2121 r
WASTE NiANAGEMM-FACILITY SITE EVALUATION 09i614At_
y
i
GENERALINFORMATION `
NAME t G LOCATION Aw m '
((tf( R�N11
8t111t(1av%(L
TELEPHONE SIZE OFOPERXTIOR I77L 61A +13 1cs�o�
LOCATION DATA
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER
NUMBER OF HOUSES WITHIN 2000 FEET OF SITE '
IS SITE WITHIN 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? YES_ NO �K,—
IS SITE AT LEAST 100 FEET FROM A 'BLUE LINE' PERENNIAL STREAM? YES— NO
IS SITE WITHIN 1 MILE ZONING JURISDICTION OF A MUNICIPALITY? YES_ NO
if yes, landowner should consult with local zoning board about required permits
WETLANDS
WILL SITE INVOLVE CLEARING WOODLAND OR ANY NON CROPLAND ? YES ✓ NO
IF YES, HAS PRODUCER COMPLETED AN AD-1026 FORM? YES✓ NO
DOES NON WETLAND NEED TO BE MEASURED BY REGISTERED SURVEYOR PRIOR TO
APPROVING WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN YES_ NO ✓
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PRODUCER TO CONTACT THE US
ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND THE NC DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TO
DETERAIINE IF ADDITIONAL PERMITS AREREQUIRED. NO WETLANDS SHOULD BE ALTERED UNTIL
PRODUCER RECEIVES"WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM SCS, US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND NC
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
WASTE NANAGEMENT — VALID ONLY IF WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN ATTACHED .
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY LAND APPLY WASTE? YES ✓ NO
IF NO, DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE LAND? YES_ NO_
SEE ATTACHED PLAN FOR SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS
SOIL INVESTIGATION — VALID ONLY IF SOIL INVESTIGATION SHEET ATTACHED
IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR LAGOON? YES ✓ NO
IS A CLAY LINER REQUIRED? YES—i G NO
IF YES, IS CLAY AVAILABLE ONSITE? YES �l NO_ QUESTIONABLE
IS A CORE TRENCH REQUIRED? . YES NO
SITE APPROVED YES ✓ NO CONDITIONAL.
u
APPROVAL RASPI) ON SCti \"1',\�:1):\I:DS VALIIt FO'.: 6U PAYS FROM DATE SIGNED. THIS APPROVAL �
i.,\C(TUT ?Il '6ii 47-:ir;; i:.t �1 :: r.:::f C
^
\ IT:�e Sod Con.,4,Xio Szr.¢a

TOWN OF BEULAY
" r P O- BOX 98�PHONE-298 46
,
z85 M
January 14, 1994
Mr. Kenneth Earl Bostic
Post Office 831
Beulaville, North Carolina 28518
Dear Mr. Bostic:
This is to inform you that your property in question located
on 111 north from the center of Beulaville is not located within
the Town of Beulaville or its zoning district. If I may be of
further service please do nothesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Billy Farmer
Town Manager-

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
November 6, 2000
IVEY T. NETHERCUTT
LIMESTONE CREEK FARM
PO BOX 702
KENANSVILLE NC 28349
Ljor
�
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS310182
Additional Information Request
Limestone Creek Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Duplin County
Dear Ivey T. Nethercutt.
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by December 6; 2000:
Please provide a clearer map that identifies (outlines or highlights) and shows the acreage for each field to
V/ be used for waste application.
��• �LD S ction II. D. of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan does not indicate the date the design work
as completed for the irrigation system. Please provide the date that the irrigation design work was
J (+� completed. An irrigation design is required for designs that were completed after September 30, 1996.
Please submit a complete copy of the Animal Waste Certification Facility forms.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be
submitted on or before December 6, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 544.
Sincerely,
Stephanie Milam
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality
Billy W. Houston, Duplin Soil & Water Conservation
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

yi
VEY T NET ERCUTT
SCALE • 11 N_ 400 FT -
I
A
r- nt
_TOTALS
t AC 5.99+/- '
j AC 9.3+/
� o
jtM)
Q
J _ �
j.
�c
`i

s tM1i T f � rsl�.m"a. r/'.� ( V�JA}'}�.'y�IN'yi','r. � � .a 1 ! .. ._ '.'•.
k�,Jr 7' - ,{t}y4\w 'r•yll i4r ��./__ � ��1= �
r�r'•Gt�ry' '";�,�_Y vt 4 ,m 4':s o. Ir II
v ;
try: 'u��"N '71 • � ;i fti�'� ?�";� _ \ tia.. t '- i ., r .t � � � f/ '
Z/ , � �ii•4 'PV ' y}I� r �Vlf'�1� � , }e�.styi 5' f` Y L Q u I ' '
i; . �A! w� �}y�•+ti_y. • , }V•i\ `WLIi )nAi% ['•41 }. •ir .: r,e.: r I. a i ' .
1 fv'N.1 `•�`'t ., {+;S.rItI�N F,{�til Nt �b(Ilr /;.. rr .. � _
Y 1, �'i. t r may. ♦ r ;; hr4?�JYS=itii r: e ' � , � .. }1� � �
IVi1 rff r'r �•S.' Sr r 'v 1 I✓,r4 i! r. ��� I r/i' I �I > II
fl DIY �•/ ff('r hr','N [IG i ./ 4 ( 1 \ \ td "�
.1 ( /'�1p�1�{ M1l �je• ' ' '�,�F irY;'•' f,4}, Si "•Y,71f !%rY `ft+= L I{ t � V 7 1 r {V '
, '\ t Er� � ti''f ;�l:.A Yr f •I!i ! { -r [+ %Q �. \ =Jl
roY
r i �' ylA. 3 '}'./r';.;}:^Y, r;r ,fir ,(Y.y Q{y? =q n• � _ ; {' .it /� Y .{ 1t O �d _� \\\ 11 �I�:
S .,p N �(ti = f:%'i?ri.^;'•'' ;5�• 1 kNlki ��r', TF '�- ? , ! }(! i, •f 7 r : � C� // \ � I
t '1 •• :',:?''r' •i%/f• �uF",Ilu+ �' { sr . n r• i ^,..� i // ' \
, I S r4 •.y{}'., .., r t9':, r , 11�^' •{ �i' (bF�• Y. // �� '
,'i \w '_ 5 , i ffif>� r .0 ,3„ry J •�� �f f a+\I;
� / laa7Ms �r .,f'+•f•CVf•iV'.ti,\.. jf .t A li. >.r/ = y ��, 4., r.:+ ,I ��•I Gi \ I I ,
is I •a- {: •,r In: II I
p\ F rf t
Z
N nit • ::. t a' : _ z �l l
1 Q•f r r i+rrly„r w I I Z /. \ II II
i i l r�.1Y,r*M O i'` i"r•r•I,J is n s! . i = , !r ! , , � \ \/ f
, 9r„/`?f '�7 'rf{,i,V yi: t..4 5�'F yr is J � � ln-r'j'.. . ♦`� II
r -. r�RiJ i +f�ii: fr� rf(hitia IrA.S 4'•`tMf "' Vl . �i� '+ `t II
A }'! {'• MIT. 5 M.. ' )!= 4 ' � •1 �\
!Yf'iv,• i.f fj%i{1r:•}�-�17Ty5 A+�(. ,_rt n''G Y. 1'K I` __4 � Iri ° ,'. \\\ /�I
` 41% `%jrf.•,>•<,k••' yJ•eV'1 >U�C !lp nst kr: , f/ r vi \\\ // .l �'.
c u11 , '%: E• r/ ,71'Ki d r ii h 11'i:, e i ry m ' r / - \� // X
ri��"" l,r., 9F f }j;y,#'nstr,$!(<}'af+?•. t, y{t' e,{y� q �r e j' f ' I x .. \\ // Z
r Q, ��$$y° ,/•+••''ryf •UI'�`,/j���'��'v<�ert la. •l�s1�•J n�',='�`'{vab { ;; t\'.�:'4�, r, �= '. 1 Z 1\ // O
I s+ t 1 f{EN'l43;'{'T�;'J".Itr'3',=ly �Y I�r✓ r =>'+f'.e{t ;.:'1•rf 1., nr r �\ N \\ //
�.si'\Iv�ill ,;{Yt�I{>Yq /),.r j,{r, r � Ilt r.. n::•: ,' 1rtl a ,. � \\ 11
+ > 1, ie ppz� yf•:nr{{,. Trr ,r N r S , 4 , I jPP . 1 /
` 1, ••. ° t�%'+ I�it'S'h}::. Yp dS rF \P r pryCl I �r II •. •� ._... �....... i,
i -Z• �, Y,r .l�'.{r;{.; W r,.,'V
,li`. iy:'• ?Z ' n .�1 �r }rV .\,,'\ rh,V.?. ,r• IS rt (6 Y J r • I II
I� i `{• +QL rr{, ��;•::r rf,V+, :{<:•Y,:•,:;:;:;:;:•.:•,;(i...
i Wf' i }:: N{.}{S'••:> ni,'; Y.,Y;?, ,?;�', r Siii}:S;:is:•if tii;: .b7.....
•xi :.• {;) .'}.•y r. • yr f /
4'i;'',.•?$::Y,ri '�4
,t,:l !. r.} �•�.�%{i;.::. :..!e: !V. •n `l, ylii 1a�y !�; '. y: \VV4 �� / .
. Y...... .Ijj�k!}�?Y. 3h.. .`�.nf.ni: •:i::::i:.i}i. ,'v •};1i$1':}}i}}?+/
''•if'44�tihy
1 5.
I. r'fr
.ry�µ+ ../i ;�I 1itu I:y�r. (a=�\I"•',:i, •� [,._ li
i
r^a!
s' n �•� L=
r:
'i
Y: il. \ :� / • ft.
♦' •4
;r
4
T
y.i.
1 Q
A= :• is a. uj :x.
r•
r�.
t
Q
F., .. rr4 `yS..'th.'i"`:{CLh.�LI'?!w:rN�M.pi:�'�<r'i!1!:ii:}> Yi>'.t `r.'.: iWS:Jt}. `•i:•':•:•:•ii:J:; _ f t W::
�:: s': y.: `.4. yq' .rii. f; ' .i.! ` . ..J .- ::e w'' ' i ' Z ii$'•i:•. ii'ti•i:•i:•:it:;:;
•:>;. g. ..CQ+. iR'fi/i...�:U:. :�7ii t.. :i:7

Z.
P. O Box 277
statest Sod
conservation Kenans-Mle Nt 28349 `
1
DeP f
Agriculture Service a Telephone [phone]
III t 1� Cl1.N.r 1'-[� �/�t, �s•kL = :: lI Z-115
r
.
•t ,
--p
{
Q bob ��l
M1
_
Dear
Enclosed is your copy of a wetland determination for tract S_ 7 on which you indicated
your intent to clear some land. The attached'map has been delineated to show the area(s) in
question. Each area to be cleared has been identified with a symbol to denote its classification.
Bclow is an explanation of the various zyribols that mayperain to your map.
W - Wetland - Area is a wetland and`sliouI3`not be cleared for any reason if you .
wish to remain eligible for USDA programs, receive SCS technical assistance, or avoid'
violating US Army Corp of Engineers' and Division±'of Environmental Management
(DEM) regulations. Any exceptions to this statement should be in writing from the Soil
Conservation Service prior to clearing land. z'
NW- Non wetland -Area is non wetland"and.can be cleared and utilized without
violating Farm Bill. 8
NW- Hon wetland - Area has hydric soils but for Farm Bill purposes only, area is
non wetland due to hydrology modification prioi`to 12/23/85. You still need to check -
with the US Army Corp of .Engineers or the NC;DEM to determine if additional permits
are necessary prior to cleaiwg.
CW Converted Wetland after 11/28/90 - Area was cleared after 11/28/90 and is
a converted wetland. Clearing constitutes a violation of the 1990 Farm Bill. In order to
regain eligibility for USDA programts, area must be restored. Consult with the SCS
about an approved restoration plan before beginning any restoration.
If you need.to clear the delineated wetlands for roads, buildings, hog lagoons or similar
activities, you can request a converted wetland for non agricultural use (CWNA) exemption.
If granted, this exemption would be for Farm Bill purposes only; therefore, you would still
need to contact the Army Corp of Engineers and the Division of Environmental Management.
To request a CWNA exemption, you should complete a request form at the SCS office. It will
take approximately 40 days to get this exemption approved once you give this office the
request. Do not start any clearing of wetland prior to receiving written notification from
this office that your CWNA request has been approved. Also you should not start clearing
until you have received approval from the Army Corp and DEM. All three permits must be
received and approved prior to clearing any wetlands.
I have tried to make this determination as fairly as possible. However if you believe this
determination is. incorrect, you have the right to appeal. To appeal send me a brief letter
explaining why you believe this determination is incorrect. Send the letter to the address on
the letterhead. This letter should be received within 15 days of your receipt of this letter.
Sincerely,
C jwMichael E. Sugg
District Conservationist
Othe Sot eonse,.t;on Servfee
la an agency of O+a
Oeoertment of Acdc.eure

'US.D_ A`' SCS CPA 026 1
(son porservaftcnService "(w1°at>
t 4 c { 4.1 J.t"iyr i _
HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND AND WETLAND .:
.. ��M"
CONSERVATION "DETERM I NATION
..4. ;Name of USDA Agency or Person Requesting Determination '
6. is sod survey now available for making a'Nghly erodible lard d
7. Are Crone highly erodible sod map units on this farm?.-. Yes
e_ list highly erodible fields that, according to ASCS records, we
crop year during 1981A 985.
S. List highly erodible fields that have been or will be converted fog
•. according to ASCS records, were not used for this purpose in an
euolled in a USDA set -aside or diversion program: • :-:' . =
3n
2. Date of Mituest
f
�
4�1
CAUnIy =-Jr. et'r°
'''' f"i *'s' +r•�i'' -
rew
'arm No. and Tract No.
-'- - '
TSA/r-)
WD
=
. .....:..'..
RELDNOls) •.
TOTAL -ACM .:..-...: .
No ❑
ratcommodtyInanY :"l.;.::.'..::_.,.�.:.
.
commodities and.
;and were not-:
J
11. Are there hydric soils on this farm? :Yes - 'No ❑ . i.� _. -:•'<� —(j. _ . -
•:;
FIELD NOjs)
TOTAL ACRES
'ti r
12- Wetlands -�^..t, (VV). including abandoned wetlands, or Farmed Wetlands (Fla) oi,Farmed,WeCands Pasture (FWP],•_ _,
Wetlands
- ° j
maybe fanned under natural conditions.' Farmed Wetlands and Fanned We_Ilair>���Paslvre maybe ���
farmed and maintained in the same manner as they were priocto DecemberM. 1985; as rorig•as they are not
abandoned:-
13. Prior Converted Cropland (PC). Wetlands that were converted prior to December 23,i9il5 The use, managemen4
..
drainage, and alteration of prior converted cropland (PC) are not subject to the wetWndmnsemation provisions unless
the area reverts to wetland as a result of abandonment.=-. -
14. Artificial Wetlands (AM. Artificial wetlands includes irrigation -induced wegands..7hes`e wetlands are not subject . -•
- . - -
- -' •
to the wetland conservation provisions..-
I5, Minimal Effect Wetlands (MW). These wetlands are lobe farmed according to the minurW ffect agreement signed.:..
`: .. .
at the time the minimal -effect determination was made. -
'
16_ Mitigation Wetlands (MIW). Wetlands on which a person is actively mitigating a frequently cropped area or a wetly d
converted between December 23, 1985 and November 28, 1990.
-
❑. Restoration with Violation (RV W-year). A restoredwvettand that was in violation as'a result of conversion
November 28. 1990. or the planting of an agricultural commodity or forage «apt I-
_ '-
18_ Restoration without Violation (RSW). A restored wedand converted between December234�1965 ands..
-
' -November 28, 1990, on which an agricultural comity has oat been planted. -
9_ Reptacement Wetlands (RPW). Wetlands which are obmterted tar purposes other" to k1Cfaase production. =:•�i
_
-
where the wetland values are being replaced at a second site.-
'0_ Good Falth Wettands (GFW.year). Wetlands on which ASCS has determined a vio(aWnn?O Da -in gaud taf hArtc ihe;
wetland has been restored. -
3. Converted Wetlands(CW). Wetlands conned after December 23.1985 and prior to 28. 1M.-An any:l-
..
- year that an 89ftuftwal commocuty is putreod on thaw Cdwenad We"mcle. Ma foe USDA bene6y?:
•.:n's=.i'.-_ ,s . '
_ ..
Z.,Conveelad Werttand(CW.yo4r). wettands conveitlod after NovomDet 28,-1 Xrao'Y - be},+�N�pa�o,[br�11MA v' y-
wi-
:.
1lxacrem betfOflL UMiI (ttl{vroltafd l{fe{tared.` '-;15-tr..c`a,.+..':I1gk - :� " 7- +.-F.;�n�Y`�'_T �:Ti'-T!r
W .C_E.W
M Converted Wetland Non-Aglteultural use (CWNA). Wetlands that are ouhvflod br Vow, Wh produeticn, atruba 7 _`-
cranberries, vineyards or building and road Constnolbn.M.
Converted Wetland Technical Error (CWTE). Wetlands that were ocnvit c as a ro A of lscorectdetertninalion
-
by SCS.
o. i ne pianneo anerauon measures on wetlands in belos - are considered maintenance and are in compliance
with FSA.
!6. The planned alteration measures on wetlands in fields are not considered to be maintenance and if
installed will cause the area to become a Converted Weiland (CW). See Rom 22 for Information on CW.year.
f7. The wetland determination was completed in the office rJ field and was dofrveredo rna.ledEt to the person on
M Remarks. ` -
cti(iyo�'_;:%�7 �t
5. I certify that the above determination is correct and adequate for use in drtenaining 30. Signature of SCS District Conservationist 31. Date
tligibiliry Jar USDA program benefits. and that wetland hydrology, hydrie sot$, and j
hydrophyric vegetation under normal circumstances test on all areas ourliaed as �ll / / t� 1r' /
_Wrdonds, Farmed Wetlands d Fa edWeitds Pasture �ty l' L Je-r,1 Ile
Aaslabnu end programs al the Sol/ Conservation Service available wlfhoat tegsns to racer. religion. color, see, age, at h4ndicap. .
^rcrson i:Gipv
9�:

FtV;
tL
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ex,
m
7 NJ%, Y�
L t '4 1
I,.-. al.1 y;p"
�m
44

NAME: r?osT/f Date
County: wOC iN �o • -
Address:
/?S CA14FRAGE
/ LEMrN_
SUPE :Era 1
EYE. r01 ELEV.
L� a• �e � �+o� ti
SECTION
i -fbl-A
E. rsLA.�UNomEI
LEECTM � -
�9 � �AYEiLAG E,
(Sw back for roam nleutKtom)
Use of facility: 043re %;'8.47;i L.aGoc/J
Capacity: � 4-p�� n 1-7 lone VfiA ao Ft3
Soil Type:
Bench hark Desar P oa At4 z74 RA54F op= 7XEE /YE,¢rL
OAF/C E
Bottom
Normal Liquid Level
Storage for normal Precip.
Kawtunn Liquid Level
25 yr. Storm_ Storage
crest ES9i
Mau.Flow Depth ,
Top of Dam
RAY
Elev. 357• N
Elev. 4-4• ,6
(+) Ft.
Elev.
(+) 7s rt.
Slay.
(+) Ft.
(+) o Ft.
Elev. •fI

' r _,.. � ��.' { ✓ : v 4 _ Y rce•-t� _.�,,,. ,tea
r U. S Department ofa Agriculture u. ICZENG-34� � ,
Soil Coesetwation Service September 19801 ,`V
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET TOR DAMS
Landowner KEMIAE-T -I tic County, �a&MOSGN
Community or Group No. Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam Ft. Length of Flood Pool Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation S f24 19
Evaluation by reachof flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam.failure.
Est.-Elev. s eva on
Kind of :Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length: Width:Slope: Land Use ; Improvements Above ':Floodwater Above
Ft. Ft. Ft. Ft.
1
2
3
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach a ciinnFN FAU IIRF OF STRUCTUpE WILL N01 PUD"Wro
LIFE OR DAMAGE PUBLIC TRANSPORTAION.
Hazard Classification of Dam (a, b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21
Dam Classification (I, II, III, IV, V)
By
name) ((title)
Concurred By 1
name title
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Da to
Date

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Vicinity Map.............................................................. 1
ASCS Field Map ............................ 2
SoilsMap ................................................................ 3
Soil Investigation Worksheet................................................... 4
Waste Treatment Plan ....................................................... 5
Waste Utilization Plan ...................................................... 6
Operation and Maintenance Plan ............................................. 7
Construction Specifications for Lagoon ....................................... 8
Seeding Plan (Farm Site) .................................................... 9
Computer Drawing of Existing Ground ....................................... 10
Existing Elevations ................................................. ... 11
Lagoon Cross Section Diagram ............................................... 12
Computer Drawing of Proposed Lagoon & Building Pad ......................... 13
SiteBalance Report.......................................................... 14
Computer Drawing -All Data -proposed ...................................... 15
Computer Drawing -Contour Lines ........................................... 16
— Computer Drawing -Sloping Lines ............................................ 17
Computer Drawing -Blow-up of Lagoon Corner ................................ 18
Building Pad Elevations..................................................... 19
Computer Cross Section - Existing• -Proposed -Balanced ......................... 20
Facility Overlaid on Existing Topo Map ... :................................... 21

ce�yy
»
/� 9 � � ■,
�
\\� � \ Z■f
�
#2rgmr

s ,e.< 07,
C� 9 o 4"
_l
/3 7 37.9
■■■■ME
■■a■u®1i■6�■il■i�■�■■
■■■
■■�u�l■�i
�■
I■i
■N
■��■���{_�®
i■l
nC�i
C
�■■■
®
®�■i�
®■
■■w■■
■■
��e®®®®®®
®■®■n
■
■■■■®C■����
■®®®■
■�
r�!!!�■■■■■■C■■�]■■■■■
■■
■■■■■■■■®■■■■®■■�■■
■
�M..■■■.■.®■...■.■
H■=■■■■■■.■■■■i■■■��
■
■
■■■■i■■■■CMEN
■■■■■®■■■®
�wcrw■®mow■�■��■��r:
MR
"'�
,, �
®■ww■■wa■■■■�s■��:
�■■■■■■■
�■w■■r®■i.w°�w■■w■■w■
a■■
■■
■
■
C
■
■iww�www
■■■i■■■■■C■
■C■
CC�CCCC:C■:C:C:■'Ci:�C��:
ME
INN
.... , ""V /!v(�G'"\ (lily
SN urr- �
/moo z z7-e, /'A6 /2Eso-/rc6s o 8s6Pv60,

0
a y
�•
�
S 1
t �i r+: r the gg t
�y.�L1S • rl
r�5�
,•�' c5 .'�
t r.
`-�
r?•la. Yi i..:. a.Yw 9
;.itia'Y: alN i....-' �n•.,ie--rY -E: Si
- L.Y .-S
5 OF MATERIAL'ENCOUN7 FREU IN UORINGS
r• (Use one,L systetila,4elow) -
UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION
_\
USUASCI:ASSIFII;ATtUN
GW-Well Rraded Riioefs: Rn'vel, sand mis
R-Rrovel
GP-Pom1y iraded'Rtnvels
n - sand
GM -Silly gravels; Rrovel-sand-slit min
vfn•very fine sand
GC -Clayey gravels; Rravel-sand-clay min
sl-sandy Inam
SW -Well groded sands; sand -Ravel min
fat -fine sandy loam
SP-Poorly Rrsded sands
1-loam
SM-Silly sand
RI -gravelly loam
SC -Clayey sands; sand -clay mixtures
ai-silt -
ML-Silts;silty. v. fine sandv sandy or clayey alit
sll-slit loam--
CL-Clays of low to medium plasticity
cl-clay loam
CR- Inorganic clays of high plasticity
sicl - silty clay loam
IMI-Elastic silts '
aci-sandy clay loam 1
OL-Organic silts and silty clays, low plasticity
sic -silty clay
ON -Organic clays, medium to high plasticity
c-clay
1. Sulteble material for embankment is arailabla ea � No tr.d",, .,A.,. t«.r.... rA. aS.kA •••.
,aw.r .tar -
REMARKS: 7T1/t✓ Si/.Cr hi4-r /9.v6>f1ST.vG LAGee:✓ moo[ 7-Pv4
hr,TiY.GR6�o. `. o.✓vfr t� rd�tr7 Co".rreocT, 2 oT1'SIn,�P p %3Gas r✓iT//
L'ONS7,PGLIioN/PcTi{•'/
� �N
ToPATyfE'/NIi�PFlr✓D/�'''s
o.: S �GSr6� To
7"yiE Sic B-. �6�%iYl
i�`Difl �7�xT
�S�-L/aPFS A,17 40
✓O` a�L ��4
L /.YF�• /.�` /moo•?/N AGcbU �oJT
i Explain hazards reQulrinR special altentlnn In draian rs.n„e.. ndv-.md .rcl a
7�.GEc-cri�o��il�A/[.98�6Aa�f� �uTG�.A sC MA%P/1Aiat/A
L t�oGi✓���L�✓Dcrei.v,157-LiXCXAW71.9
T4.?Z0' ,�EmAriztrlA6 o" cc/BsT rioB
A^ O t3a.so /lvG /990 AA°LA �4Ae rG Lim e
,
A �Ath,y>E G;141G $3O u-!eO TO Ce/SY/1CFe Soi< abA"J/Tio�,s. $f3e��/
GENERAL REMARKS:
LgoT%am o� .CA6o,a n,1 "io2 T. .PEsKG COA/-r7le .CTjo.t/.
0
Gtg3o ak°'� B+S°
�k�
9
s1
28
37
?s
24
M
1 al
77oNj
s•
11
sa
77
28
39
40
al
et
u
au
11
{s
17
as
1a
10
al
-2-15611
AT
So A
v-Ad
`
sm
S
-2a
so
-2-tr5f
Ism
_511C
01
s
m
SC
3-4
Sm
yc
p
a5
aye

f
WASTE
rILIZATION
PLAN
FOR
Kenneth 3cstic
P.O. Sox 93
Beulav'_lle NC 29513
April 22, ±cca _
Your animal waste utilization plan has been specifically
developed for your 3552 77"rr3N TO FEEDER SWINE operation.
The plan is based on the soil types, crops to be grown, and
method of application forvcur particular operation. The caste
must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the
animal waste should be used =o reduce the amount of commercial
fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where_ the waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization D_a- uses nitrogen as
the 14_mitinc nutrient. Rash should be analyzed before_ each
aDDlicat'_On and annual soil rests are enccuraced sc --hat a--
plant nut_4enr_s and ea
lime can ne balanced for r__st_c yie_.�
of the crops to be grown_.
Several factors are imper=a-t in implementing your waste
utilization plan In Order z= maximize the fen=ilizer value
Of the Waste and to ensure -hat it is arm!' -n an env r-_n-
mentally safe manner- Always apply waste nased on =ne needs
Of the crop to be crown and =he nutrient conzent •,f =he waste.
The amount of available nitrccen for plant use is dependant cn
the method of application. Soil type is important cue to
different leaching potential and yield potential. Waste shall
not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 --ors Der acre
per year. -Do not apply waste_ on saturated soils -or on land
when the surface is frozen. 74
-- ther of these--onditions may
result in runoff to sur'_ace waters. Wind conditicns sheul--
also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems.
TO maximize the value Of --he nutrients for C_ .pnOductzcn and
reduce the Dotential for pc-luticn, waste should be applied
a growing crop or not more =aan 30 days prior planting.
Soil-ncornoration of the waste will cOnser•Te nutrients -and
reduce odor problems.
The acres needed aptly_ __e anima- waste are cased On
-voica'_ nutrient center•_ f.,_ --h-JS = -e of
acreage requirements may be more _ass depe-din, �,P_ -He
specific waste_ analysis -pore fc_ your lime
of .__icatidn.

4
r
V.
yi
Your waste utilizat
i6n plan is based ,on the 'following ij it 4 TY ;c
TABLE A. AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR
-----------------------------------------=--------------- =
NUMBER OF ITONS WASTE PER I TONS WASTE
ANIMALS TYPE OF ANIMALS 1000 ANIMALS PER YEAR
- --------------------------
---------------------------
3552 WEAN TO FEEDER 400 1420.8
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE B. SUMMARY OF CROPS BY FIELD
TRACT
FIELD
-
I SOIL
-------
ACRES
-------
CROP
-----------
--------------------
CROPCODE
5817
2
AUB
2
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS HAY
- -------
SH
5817
3
AUB
3.9
11.39
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS HAY
BH
70877
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
AUB
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS HAY
BH
TABLE C. SUMMARY OF CROPS, YIELD, AND NUTRIENT REQUIREMENTS BY SOIL TYPE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CROP ------------------ SOILIYIELDIUNITS TOTAL-NIO 140
*TOTAL P OTAL K
---------- ---- -----
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS HAY AUB 5.5 TONS 275 - 160
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Total phosphate and potash amounts should be confirmed with a soil test.
TABLE D. WASTE MANAGEMENT BY FIELD
CROP
WASTE APPL
TYPE
WASTE N
COMM N
MONTHS TO APPLY
TRACT
-------
FIELD
-----
CODE
-----
METHOD
----------
WASTE
LB/AC
LB/AC
ANIMAL WASTE
5817
2
BH
IRRIGATE
-------
SWINE
--------
275
-------
0
-----------------'-
APRIL TO OCT
5817
3
BH
IRRIGATE
SWINE
275
0
APRIL TO OCT
70877
1
BH
IRRIGATE
SWINE
275
0
APRIL TO OCT

If ji re commerc al fertilize= `is us_"ed•
additional'acies''of-landawill'be needei
grass,filter'strip should'be seeded dl
receive animal waste. .,11 1". .
hown ,=in the cp
NN K'rv. nb- xe.a
f71the�'type7sh
is;,'shown din
all ditches'i
:rman6ht
that ,
The acres shown in Table-B are the usable acres in the field shown. Usable
acres are the acres that must be able to receive animal waste. Buffer areas
along ditches, houses, property lines, etc. have been subtracted from the
total field acreages to arrive at the usable acres. The total acres shown
on the attached map is needed for land application in order to have the
proper buffer areas. A combination of land application equipment or
irrigation equipment may be needed in order to properly land apply waste to
all parts of the fields listed. It is the responsibility of the producer to
acquire whatever equipment is needed to properly land apply the waste.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS C,, a5T4c NnelwyDA Ta Be.: i,v ,Sr?ei.yG OF -
Prepared by: Title
Concurred in by: 2.�. Date
Producer

Se i
40rth y."r-are
Bwgiarland Agfi=IftnW
LIVEM= YLSM SANFL3 PC, ANAMSIS AIM CA =LTI09
OF LAND A.MICATI08 BATES
James C. Barker*
I. SAIM CO=CTIOg
A. Seri -Solid Lot Manore
L. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a• From loaded spreader, collect abent.2 lbs of amours !`root
A***- oot locations using nottttetallic eolLatess.
L.L. From storage
a. Collect about 2 lbs of manure from under the surface crust
aaoidiog bedding materials and using mcaatallie collectors.
B. Liquid Usnota slurry
i. under -slotted -floor pit
a. Extend a 1/2' nonmetallic araGuit open on both ends into
manure to pit floor.
b. Sul tamper and of conduit (a.g., by placing a thtmb over aid
Of conduit) trapping --a that bas entered lover and, remove
and oopty slurry into plastic bucket or nonmetallic container.
c. Take subsamples from 5 or more locations or at least 1 quart.
d. His and add about 3/4 pint to notmmtallic sample container.
a* .
ii. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. Hake ammo asoure has been well mimed with a liquid ttanwa
chopper -agitator pump or propeller agitator.
b. lake a haamples from about 3 pit locations, true asltatez plow
er trs am=* spreader and plasm 1m a tiastis bosh".
+d ist. Biological and A{ricultural.
Oapatam m. Morse Carolina State university. dale, yC.

7�
-4,
At t .1c 11f4cp t K
U.,
SAXPU
-PUPARATION An
P7,
A. Plaas"Sample into an
expandable container that Can
be sealed Altai
soa*' p, a from container with clean vate'r.but do not use' IdLsLnf actants'...
or treat in any other way.
B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze, or transfer to 1 . ab quickly.
C. Hand-dalLvery is most reliable way of sample transfer.
D. If mailed, protect sample containex with packing material such as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. contacts:
L. A&L Eastern Agricultural Lab, Inc. LLL. P017f*421 Packers Corp.
7621 7aitepLne Road 2320 S. Poster Avenue
Richmond, VA 23237 Wheeling, IL 60090
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
LL. Fisher Scientific Co. iv. HASCO
3315 Winton load•
901 JanesvUla Avenue
2,1164h, 11C 27604 Fort AtIclason. V7 53538
Ph:' [phone] Ph: [phone]
F. Private anal7tLema labs are available, but sample analyses are Costly.
G. The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents.
i. Address: ress: North Carolina Dgp&rtmmt of Agrimlture
Agronomic Division
Plent/Uste/SolutLon Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
P.O. Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Bay Campbell
ii. Forward $4 along with the sample.
iii. Include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turka y, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (twine -nursery, finishing. turkey -breeders,
brooderhouse, grower, number flocks grown on litter; etc.)
c. Waste type (dairy -lot scraped manure, liquid slurry, svizw-pit
slurry, lagoon liquid, sludge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
iv. Routine analyses performed an &.11 samiples: V. P. K. Ca. ft. Va.
1. Fe. am. ZM. CU. I
v.. Additional analyses performed upon request: DPI, Ito, Cd, YL. Pb

Operator:KENNETH BOSTIC
County: DUPLIN
J � '
` FRS
Date: 08/30/94
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner): 900.0
feet
1. AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT (ALW)
0 sows (farrow to finish)
x 1417 lbs. =
O
lbs
0 sows (farrow to feeder)
x 522 lbs. =
0
lbs
0 head (finishing only)
x - .135_lbs. =
0
lbs
0 sows (farrow to wean)
x '-.433 lbs. =
0
lbs
1776 head (wean to feeder)
x 30 lbs. =
53280
lbs
Describe other
0
Total
--Average Live Weight =
53280
lbs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME
OF LAGOON
Volume = 53280 lbs. ALW x
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb.
ALW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW
= 1 CF/lb. ALW
Volume = 53280 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION NoTF'--CKC(..u0E0 AT ©µW S1LS
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet P, EQvEgr
4. TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
Inside top length (feet)--------------------- 130.0
Inside to width ---------------
P (feet) )----- -- 125.0 (AVERAGE-)
Top of dike elevation (feet)----------------- 46.1
Bottom of lagoon elevation (feet)------------ 35.1
Freeboard (feet)----------------------------- 1.0
Side slopes (inside,lagoon)------------------ 3.0 1
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 124.0 119.0 10.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
124.0 119.0 14756 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
64.0 59.0 3776 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
94.0 89.0 33464 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. _ ..AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM() * DEPTH/6
14756.0 33464.0 3776.0 1.
Total Designed Volume Available = 86660 CU. FT.

5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
130.0 125.0 16250.0 square feet -
Buildings (roof and lot water)
0.0 square feet
TOTAL DA 16250.0 square feet
Describe this area.
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Feces & urine production in gal./day per 135 lb. ALW 1.37
Volume = 53280 lbs. ALW/135 lbs. ALW * 1.37 gal/day 180 days
Volume = 97325 gals. or 13011.3 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon.water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallons
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet per CF
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per -foot
Volume = 9479.2 cubic feet

5D
3
7
Volume of 25 year - 24 hour 'storm
Volume = 7.5 inches / 12 inches per foot
* DA
Volume = 10156.3 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 13011 cubic feet
5B. 0 cubic feet
5C. 9479 cubic feet
5D. 10156 cubic feet ✓"
TOTAL 32647 cubic feet �
SUMMARY
Temporary storage period____________________>
180
days
Rainfall in excess of evaporation=====______>
7.0
inches
25 year - 24 hour rainfall__________________>
7.5
inches
Freeboard___________________________________>
1.0
feet
Side slopes_________________________________>
3.0
: 1
Inside top length___________________________>
130.0
feet
Inside top width____________________________>
125.0
feet
Top of dike elevation==== ------------- _______>
46.1
feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation==_______________>
35.1
feet
Total required volume_______________________>
85927
cu. ft. '*
Actual design volume________________________>
86660
cu. ft.
Seasonal high watertable elevation (SHWT)===>f1z•o8-5
feet
Stop pumping elev.__________________________>
42.6
feet
Must be > or = to the SHWT elev.====______>
4i.o36.5
feetA0
Must be > or = to min. req. treatment el.=>
41.1
feet
Required minimum treatment volume=====______>
53280
cu. ft.
Volume at stop pumping elevation=====_______>
54025
cu. ft.
Start pumping elev._________________________>
44.4
feet
Must be at bottom of freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25 yr.- 24 hr. rainfall==>
76504
cu. ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation=====______>
76546
cu. ft.
Required volume to be pumped________________> 22491 cu. ft.
Actual volume planned to be pumped=====_____> 22521 cu. ft
3 i37:3:
Min. thickness of soil liner when re uir==> 1. fe
yed r�+
q /i 111, /J
DESIGNED BY:, APPROVED
APPROVED BY:/�l^��. �c"�%•'`°•�/9s�
o
DATE: DATE: 9 �cf_� �' ;� J C-nI0iL9�:
IZEA
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:R- /�s/,F/c 4..iC /.✓ n'_7T:+s± .
05158
C� J
il:0l,`
/3lF fC Cr ,--s-r fe-c7, cw O N
it Kt.rTin<G SrTc' G'cN.tJJ t/°,.✓c oy ,moo,! /rvv,cZ.tT/ G;9Ti u' Syt:�%

5D. Volume of 25
year - 24 hour storm
Volume =
7.5 inches / 12 inches per
foot * DA
Volume =
11743.9 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 13011 cubic
feet
5B. 0 cubic
feet
5C. 10961 cubic
feet
5D. 11744 cubic
feet
TOTAL 35716 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
Temporary storage period____________________>
180
days
Rainfall in excess of evaporation=====______>
7.0
inches
25 year - 24 hour rainfall__________________>
7.5
inches
Freeboard___________________________________>
1.0
feet
Side slopes_________________________________>
3.0
: 1
Inside top length___________________________>
139.6
feet
Inside top width____________________________>
134.6
feet
Top of dike elevation_______________________>
.46.1
feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation__________________>
33.5
feet
Total required volume_______________________>
88996
cu. ft.
Actual design volume________________________>
rrITf 85
cu. ft.
Seasonal high Watertable elevation (SHWT)===>
38.5
feet
Stop pumping elev._____--------------------- 1
42.6
feet
Must be > or = to the SHWT elev.====______>
38.5
feet
Must be > or = to min. req. treatment el.=>
39.5
feet
Required minimum treatment volume=====______>
53280
cu. ft.
Volume at stop pumping elevation=====_______>
73827
cu. ft.
Start pumping elev._________________________>
44.4
feet
Must be at bottom of freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25 yr.- 24 hr. rainfall==>
100441
cu. ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation=====______>
100379
cu. ft.
Required volume to be pumped________________>
23972
cu. ft.
Actual volume planned to be pumped=====_____>
26552
cu. ft.
Min. thickness of soil liner when required==>
1.8
feet
7. DESIGNED BY: 4tCLG,Q 4- ate- APPROVED BY:
DATE: bt3019 '�- DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:
a) 5i6N 00(-0ME W /LtRE2 = 117-1 185 W.4
.2SSZS
9'�S � • yds

e�h
• - ' n
I ,a..:
rpPERATION
})
AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment .(permanent storage)
180 days of temporary storage. The'timCre"quired for the `.pla`40ed
fluid level (permanent and temporary storage) .to be reached miy,yary.-
due to site conditions, weather, flushing operations, and the amount
of fresh water added to the system.
The designed temporary storage consists of 180 days storage for:
(1) waste from animals and (2) excess rainfall after evaporation. Also
included is storage for the 25 year - 24,hour storm for the location.
The volume of waste generated from a given number of animals will be
fairly constant throughout the year and from year to year, but excess
rainfall will vary from year to year. The 25 year rainfall will not
be a factor to consider in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage
volume must always be available.
A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). If the outlet pipe is not installed at the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent marker must be installed at this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain lagoon treatment depth.
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste.(see attachment)
before land application.
3. Begin temporary storage pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level
reaches the elevation 44.4 as marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -
out when the fluid level reaches elevation 42.6 . This temporary
storage, less 25 yr- 24 hr storm, contains 22491 cubic feet or
168229 gallons.

a
_ 1
• e t vYi� " in5 t i
Pill,'
m. s SHEET 2 toF s y
4. The recommen3ed maximum amount to apply per.irrigation As
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum avplication rate is'0 3A
inch per h6ur.:Refer to the waste utilization plan for•further.details:
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the .
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted 4rom the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. Keep a minimum of 25 feet of grass vegetated buffer around
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not pump within 200 feet of a
residence or within 100 feet of a well. Waste shall be applied in a
manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

z
SPECIFICATIONS..FOR CONSTRUCTION------------------
C
FOUNDATION PREPARATION:
The foundation area of the lagoon embankment and building pad shall:be
cleared of trees, logs, stumps, roots, brush, boulders,sod and rubbish.
Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The topsoil from
the lagoon and pad area should be stripped and stockpiled for use on
the dike and pad areas. After stripping, -,the foundation area of the
lagoon embankment and building pad shall -be thoroughly loosened prior
to placing the first lift of fill material to get a good bond.
EXCAVATION AND EARTHFILL PLACEMENT:
The completed excavation and earthfill shall conform to the lines,
grades, and elevations shown on the plans. Earthfill material shall
be free of material such as sod, roots, frozen soil, stones over
6 inches in diameter, and other objectionable material. To the extent
they are suitable, excavated materials can be used as fill. The fill
shall be brought up in approximately horizontal layers not to exceed 9
inches in thickness when loose and prior to compaction. Each layer
will be compacted by complete coverage with the hauling and spreading
equipment or standard tamping roller or other equivalent method.
Compaction will be considered adequate when fill material is observed
to consolidate to the point that settlement is not readily detectible.
NOTE THE SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PLACEMENT OF LINERS IN THE LINER
SECTION OF THIS SPECIFICATION. The embankment of the lagoon shall be
installed using the more impervious materials from the required
excavations. Construction of fill heights shall include 5 percent for
settlement. Dikes over 15 feet in height and with an impoundment
capacity of 10 acre-feet or more fall under the jurisdiction of the NC
Dam Safety Law. The height is defined as the difference in elevation
from the constructed height to the downstream toe of the dike.
Precautions shall be taken during construction to prevent excessive
erosion and sedimentation.
LINER: THE MINIMUM REQUIRED THICKNESS SHALL BE
1.6 ft.
NOTE: LINERS (PARTIAL OR FULL) ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE ATTACHED SOILS
INVESTIGATION REPORT SO INDICATES OR WHEN UNSUITABLE MATERIAL IS
ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. A TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF THE LINER
IS INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN WHEN LINERS ARE REQUIRED BY THE SOILS REPORT.
When areas of unsuitable material are encountered, they will be over -
excavated below finish grade to the specified depth as measured
perpendicular to the finish grade. The foundation shall be backfilled
as specified to grade with a SCS approved material (ie - CL,SC,CH).
REFER TO THE SOILS INVESTIGATION INFORMATION IN THE PLANS FOR SPECIAL
CONSIDERATIONS.

jai f. '21 .<��..: a .._'i �: �-(j � __ � �l.'•�� 1{n'�,�•�i`yq.s.t #.. �`SSHFi�ET ��2 �'�e"'�!-.1 T���,"..
Soil liner material shall come from an.aproved.?borrows-area `Thteb
minimum water content of the liner material shall be ,optimum 'moisture<_ '
content which relates to that moisture content ialien the; soil As ""a'
in the hand it will form a ball -which does not'rea3ily;separate. Water
shall be added -to borrow as necessary to insure proper °moiisture content
during placement of the liner.' The moisture content of the liner:"
material shall not be less than optimum water content during placement.
The maximum water content relates to the soil material being too -wet
for efficient use of hauling equipment and proper compaction. Proper
compaction of the liner includes placement in 9 inch lifts and
compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum ASTM D698 Dry Unit
Weight of the liner material. When smooth,or hard, the previous lift
shall be scarified and moistened as needed before placement of the next
lift.
The single most important factor affecting the overall compacted perme-
ability of a clay liner, other than the type of clay used for the
liner, is the efficient construction processing of the compacted liner.
The sequence of equipment use and the routing of equipment in an estab-
lished pattern helps assure uniformity in the whole placement and
compaction process. For most clay soils, a tamping or sheepsfoot
roller is the preferable type of compaction equipment.
The soil liner shall be protected from the discharge of waste outlet
pipes. This can be done by using some type of energy dissipator(rocks)
or using flexible outlets on waste pipes.
Alternatives to soil liners are synthetic liners and bentonite sealant.
When these are specified, additional construction specifications are
included with this Construction Specification.
CUTOFF TRENCH:
--------------
A cutoff trench shall be constructed
shown on a typical cross section in
cutoff trench shall be determined by
materials.
VEGETATION:
under the embankment area when
the plans. The final depth of the
observation of the foundation
All exposed embankment and other bare constructed areas shall be seeded
to the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after construc-
tion according to the seeding specifications. Topsoil should be placed
on areas of the dike and pad to be seeded. Temporary seeding or mulch
shall be used if the recommended permanent vegetation is out of season
dates for seeding. Permanent vegetation should be established as soon
as possible during the next period of approved seeding dates.
REMOVAL OF EXISTING TILE DRAINS
When tile drains are encountered, the tile will be removed to a minimum
of 10 feet beyond the outside toe of slope of the dike. The tile
trench shall be backfilled and compacted with good material such as
SC, CL, or CH.

AREA TO BE SEEDED: 1.0 ACRES
USE THE SEED MIXTURE INDICATED AS FOLLOWS:
0.0 LBS. FESCUE GRASS AT 60 LBS./ACRE
(BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER 1 TO NOVEMBER 30
FEBRUARY 1 TO MARCH 30
0.0 LBS. RYE GRAIN AT 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
0.0 LBS. 'PENSACOLAI BAHIA GRASS AT 60 LBS./ACRE
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1)
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO JUNE 15
8.0 LBS. HULLED COMMON BERMUDA GRASS AT 8 LBS./ACRE
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO JULY 31
0.0 LBS. UNHULLED COMMON BERMUDA GRASS AT 10 LBS./ACRE
SEEDING DATES: JANUARY 1 TO MARCH 30
40.0 LBS. RYE GRASS AT 40 LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMBER 1 TO MARCH 30
LBS.
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
1000.0 LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (1000 LBS./ACRE)
2.0 TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
100.0 BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 BALES/ACRE)
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 8
LBS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.

Orientati
62.
60.
48.
46.
44.
42.
40.
38.
36.
Lower Left
30 Mesh Surface
Existing
Project: KENNETH BOSTIC
Drawing: 1776 ADDITION
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: using Sitework
cation: 20.8
i..
.I.
IY 1
t 1;
Iy.
yt
ep I
I.
I i
I
30 Mesh
�r•�i`'.Rr �
I,y
!3�.
Ib I, t
i

Orientate
S0.
48.
46.
44.
42.
40.
38.
36.
34.
Lower Let ..
30 Mesh Surface
Proposed
Project: KENNETH BOSTIC
Drawing: 1776 ADDITION
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: using Sitework
lotion: 20.0
30 Mesh.
i!
i'
7
r�

�or1F�N+EvnENr B�DQ.
FiNisAeD FIooR EIEV,
Tod of AAD EIFV�
'T"� }� ICWL GQOSS 5SCrI09 91SW
—tt P1-T R cN'ARG
ROTTOrA D P SUN+
ELrn-VI
p A DNS n
AtslCty
45.G► -TOTAL DC-610-t
STDRW[;•F �l.tcVi
h-kl'-4
L+A GoDN
z N i��Rr Dr- ow rLlt't �3P
y.(�.36 �ETTLE�p ;•
8 PIPE �I 3,D , I
r.�
UiGooN
SuPpoR't �EPTN ;:'r
35• I I � `• , ',,
t3o1ToV,n
>��; -ra Y1�rE4T pfvA,l.Y�t��
w��nl h12TrA5 DF vh�ivlT'AkRJ13�h
�.� g� �>CGAVATE�b ,Aivt�fN��
d✓El.oµl !o►?.ao� Atip::a>3��KFi
• davlP�-rEt7 w�r�-I c;GS`��PP��
tir AT tF fi-f �.L .1.

Surfaces:
Proposed
Existing
Tight Volumes
Cut: 6080.94
Fill: 5294.40
Difference: 786.54
All volumes are in cubic yards.
Expansion (%) Expanded Volumes
0.00 6080.94
30.00 6882.72
Net Import: 801.78
A- Kom
Grid cell size: 5.95 by 6.01
_original scale_-100.00ft/in_
Project: KENNETH BOSTIC
Drawing: 1776 ADDITION
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: using Sitework
'Ti-�e �%I.uMES GIBE$
Ator
us lift
ib
w I
5I�

0
1
46. 11
00
Tr
dr
.at
a i h
Who
Plot of all data for the surface:
Proposed
Project: KENNETH BOSTIC
Orawing: 1776 ADDITION
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: using Sitework
38.00
43.00
ter

'Plot of the contour data for the surface:
Proposed
Project: KENNETH BOSTIC
Drawing: 1776 ADDITION
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: using Sitework

as.ii
as.35.1136. 11z46*
Z
36.IS
jk35.11 .i�////46. i1 4
0
38.00
36.11
46.1
'43.00
.00
ICr1 �.00
117
Plot of the sloping lines for the surface:
Proposed
Project: KENNETH BOSTIC
Drawing: 1776 ADDITION
Number:
Location:
Bid Data:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: using Sitework

MJoma;TS Buran :fiq paladaid
;uogewr;s3
:aaum0
:.aaau TBu3
:a4a0 PT9
:UCTIRMO-:
•.iagwnN
N0I1I001d 9LLT :BuTmeaO
3I1S09 H13NN3H :400CoJd
:aoa}Jns DWI 404 a3aP TTa 10 3OTd
L9'97
T
�
3
�
T
a
3
U
�
z
z
Q
n
rA3N
9
p
MAN
00.94
a7..,

00
3.00
0
: KENNETH BOSTIC : 1776 ADDITION: Proposed
30 AUG 94 2*19

62.00
Proposed
Existing
48.00 ..................................... ............ .................................................................................................................................................... I ............... ................................. ............ I ..........................
46.00 . ..... .............. ... ........................ ........... ......... 1'q
I de
44.00 . .......... ... .. ... ..... ... .. ............ ...................
42.00 .. .. .. . . .. .... .. . . ... .... ........ ................. ................... ..... ...... ...... .
40.00 .. ... . .... ... ... ... ........... ......
38. ea ....................... ... ............... ............ ....... .. .... ....................................... - ...... .......... ........... ...................... ............................ ........... ...........................
36.00 ......... ... ....................... ........ ...... ...................... .. ........ .................. ........................................... ....... ........................................ ........
34.00
(177.46,421.50) <316.96>
(494.41
KENNETH BOSTIC 1776 ADDITION
30 AUG 94

46.11
: KENNETH BOSTIC : 1776 ADDITION: Proposed
36.
38.00
I
ill 43. 00
.00
ria
Phter
30
AUG
94
'2:

52.00
Proposed
Be. ee . . . . . .. .................... ............................... .................. ............ .............................................................. ......................................... .....................................................................................................
Existing
48.00 .. . ................. ................................ . ....... ........... . . . ..................................................................................................................................................
............................
l4i
...... ....... - ....... ....... ...... ............. ........ ............ ..... ......
........................................ .......... ................ .......... ...............
46.00 ... ....... ........ ..................
44.00 ............. ....... .. . ........ . .. .. .... .. ..... . .. .. .... . . ...... ............ ...........
42.00 ...... . . . .. . ....... ... .. .... ..... . ........ .................. . .. . .. .. ... .... .....
.......... .......... ... .. ........ ......... ....... . ..................... ......
. . 40.00 ... .. .. .. ... ........
.......
... ..... ........... ..... .............. I
38.00 .. .. . .. ... ... .... . ... .. ... .. .. . ... .. ........ . ............ .......... ..... ..................................... I ...........
36.00 ... ... .. . .... ..
.............. . ....... ........ ........................ .......
34.00
(423.39,151.75)
<370.23> (422.54,
KENNETH BOSTIC 1776 ADDITION
30 AUG 94

3
4
Ep,
7
IM'
�­a
N
74
7 7
7
- -
,
-
"
a
Te
Ir 7
-17
ctlq;:
7.
T, Zi
m
PO
­�,;l
.7
77
7
.1-1-1
-LIA
IA
jj
t
i
44
4
4-
�17
-1-4-44 L
144-
+4-
L
T
-4
- kf_.. ak
r% C!
:31P
T_
7
N
7
----------
T - --
77 1
.'s
Akt are.
7 7 T.J I -F
low �111