310097_HISTORICAL_20171231

PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 31-97 County: Du lin
Facility Name: Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Certified Operator Name: 8I11 11 atrick Operator Number. 19659
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 9 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
n
13
2. Check all applicable items
x Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
`Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
'if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
116/2014
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the Information is
accurate and correct.
Phone:
Fa ility Owner/Ma alter (print)
Date:
F cility Owner/ Manag signature)
910-290-1983
1/3/2014

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID:
line m =
945.4 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 945.41bPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
eWacre)
L TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELo (lbs.)
column r x a
u. applicatlon window
1
Wheat
5.43
104.00
564.7
2
Small Grain
5.53
96.00
530.9
3
Small Grain
5.63
96.00
540.5
4
Small Grain
4.73
44.00
208.1
5
Small Grain
3.37
44.00
148.3
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 1992.5 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = 945.4 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121100

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) = 1992.5 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -1047 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping it needed. Pulls 2 and 3 Small Grain follows Millit and will be removed with haying
practices.
PoA (30 bay) 2121100

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/identifier (ID):
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage 8 structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 13.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural Freeboard 18.0 Inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 6.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 67500 ft
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallonstW 252450 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 388800 ft
h. current herd # 1400 certified herd # 2880
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g 189000 fe
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + I + j) x 7.48 x 30 daysiline f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
1. current waste analysis dated 6/24/2013
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
39375 ft
284708 gallons
1.76 Ibs/1000 gal.
945.4 lbs. PAN

s a
Dfl�J ie
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
04-11-2007
This plan has been prepared for:
Billy Kilpatrick Farm 31-97
Billy Kilpatrick
PO Box 94
Kenansville, NC 28349 f
910-296-0619 3 J �"
This plan has been developed by:
Bill Thomas
NRCS Kenansville FO
PO Box 219
Kenansville, NC 28349
[phone]
-f J)
l
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
Y (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Si ture (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
LI-11-011
C
i
.-
APR 0 6 2009
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: -P[j ! %
Technical Specialist Signature Date
IL
---------------------------------------------------------------
234263 Database Version 3.1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Printed: 04-11-2odKCEIVE Y( L?W9
QQUIFFR'PRC1TFr..Tnm . FCTION
MAR 31 2nnq

' 1
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 4,004,640 gals/year by a 4,320
animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
9224
Incorporated
15 840
Injected
17445
Irrigated
10026
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
10,026
13542
-3,516
5,409,244
-1,404,604
Year 2
10,026
17842
-7,816
7,126,993
-3,122,353
-----------------------,--S ---- -e-- ans ----sta--nda--rd ---sourc--- --e, ------ me--------s us- er---• de--fi-- --ned--sour------ce. -----------------------------------------•------------------
Note: In source cIDmU an
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 Source Page Page 1 of 1

Narrative
Waste Plan is written based on wetted acre footprint.
------------------•------------------------------------------ --------------- - ---- - - - -----
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 Narrative Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are
also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if
the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Punned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
LI
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P2O5
Removal
(lbs/acre)
Applied
pbs/acre)
3186
10
6.93
6.93
Medium
NIA
Autryville
Com, Grain
85 bu.
37
NIA
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
23
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
20
N/A
3186
11
6.64
6.64
Medium
N/A
Autryville
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
37
NIA
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
23
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
20
NIA
3186
12
7.52
7.52
Medium
NIA
Autryville
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
37
NIA
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
23
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
20
NIA
3186
13
7.52
7.52
Medium
NIA
Autryville
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
37
NIA
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
23
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
20
NIA
3186
14
3.94
3.94
Medium
NIA
Autryville
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
37
NIA
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
23
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
20
NIA
3186
15
3.22
3.22
Medium
NIA
Autryville
Corn, Grain
85 bu,
37
NIA
Wheat, Grain
45 bu-
23
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
20
N/A
3186
16
6.78
6.78
Medium
1 NIA
Lynchburg
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
55
NIA
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
28
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
31
NIA
3186
17
63
6.30
Medium
NIA
Lynchburg
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
55
NIA
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
28
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
31
NIA
3186
18
6.30
6,30
Medium
NIA
Lynchburg
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
55
NIA
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
28
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
31
NIA
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 4/11/2007
PCS Page Page i of 3
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

I , ,
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
LI
'
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P2O5
Removal
(Ibs/acre)
Applied
(lbslacre)
3186.
19
6.78
6,78
Medium
NIA
Lynchburg
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
55
NIA
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
28
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
31
NIA
3829
1
5.43
5.43
Medium
NIA
Autryville
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
37
NIP`
Wheat, Crain
45 bu.
23
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
20
N/A
3829
2
5.53
5.53
Medium
NIA
Norfolk
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
51
NIA
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
NIA
3829
3
5.63
5.63
Medium
NIA
Norfolk
Corn, Grain
115 bu-
51
NIA
Wheat, Grain L
60 bu-
30
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 1
35 bu.
28
NIA
3829
4
4.73
4.73
Medium
NIA
Autryville
Corn, Crain
85 bu.
37
N/A
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
23
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
20
NIA
3829
5
3.37
3.37
Medium
NIA
Autryville
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
37
NIA
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
23
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
20
NIA
3829
6
3.86
3.86
Medium
NIA
Autryville
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
37
NIA
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
23
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
20
NIA
3829
7
3.04
3.04
Medium
NIA
Autryville
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
37
NIA
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
23
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
20
NIA
3629
8
2.10
2.10
Medium
NIA
Autryville
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
37
NIA
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
23
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
20
NIA
3829
9
2.43
2.43
Medium
NIA
Autryville
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
37
NIA
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
23
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
20
N/A
PLAN TOTALS: 98.05 98.05
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 4/1112007
PCs Page Page 2 of 3
NOTE: Symbol " means user entered data.

;..LI..,...::r
Poteiitral Leaching
Technical Cniidance, :,r e
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
< 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
>— 2 &
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<= 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned_ Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples
> 10
are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778),
and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
PIATln
Amen da_ tron
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
25 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 4/11/2007
PCS Page Page 3 of 3
NOTB: Symbol ' means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
'tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crap
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(1bs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbslA)
Res.
(lbslA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pphed
(lbs/A)
liquid
ManutcA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
tons
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
3186
10
S7
Autryville
6.93
6.93
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
2/15-6/30
104
0
20
lrrig.
84
33.55
0.00
232.52
0.00
3186
10
S7
Autryville
6.93
6.93
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*911-4130
104
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.62
0.00
115.15
0.00
3186
11
S7
Autryville
6.64
6.64
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
2/15-6/30
104
0
20
Irrig.
84
33.55
0.00
222.79
0.00
3186
11
S7
Autryville
6.64
6.64
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*911-4130
104
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.62
0.00
110,34
0.00
3186
12
S7
Autryville
7.52
7.52
Com, Grain
85 bu.
2115-6/30
104
0
20
brig.
84
33.55
0.00
252.32
0.00
3186
12
S7
Autryville
7.52
7.52
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*9/1.4130
104
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.62
0.00
124.96
0.00
3186
13
S7
Autryville
7.52
7.52
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
2/15-6/30
104
0
20
Irrig.
84
33.55
0.00
252.32
0.00
3186
13
S7
Autryville
7.52
7.52
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*9/1.4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.62
0.00
12496
0.00
3186
14
S7
Autryville
3.94
3.94
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
2/15-6130
104
0
20
Irrig.
84
33.55
0.00
13220
0,
3186
14
S7
Autryville
3.94
3.94
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*9/1-4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.62
0.00
65.47
0.00
3186
15
S7
Autryville
3.22
3.22
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
2/15.6/30
104
0
20
Irrig.
84
33.55
0.00
108.04
0.00
3186
15
S7
Autryville
3.22
3.22
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*9/1-4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.62
0.00
53.51
0.00
3186
16
S7
Lynchburg
6.78
6.78
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
2/15-6/30
135
0
20
Irrig.
115
45.94
0.00
311,44
0.00
3186
16
S7
Lynchburg
6,78
6.78
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
*9/1-4/30
106
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.94
0.00
114.83
0.00
3186
17
S7
Lynchburg
6.30
6.30
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
2/15-6/30
135
0
20
Irrig.
115
45.94
0.00
289.40
0.00
3186
17
S7
Lynchburg
6.30
6.30
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
*911-4/30
106
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.94
0.00
106.7D
- 0.00
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/11/2007 WUT Page Page 1 of 5

Waste Utilization Table
Year I
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
3196
18
S7
Lynchburg
6.30
6.30
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
2/15.6/30
135
0
20
brig.
115
45,94
0,00
289.40
0.00
3186
18
S7
Lynchburg
6,30
6.30
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
*911-4130
106
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.94
0.00
106.70
0.00
3186
19
S7
Lynchburg
6.79
6.78
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
2/15-6/30
135
0
20
Irrig.
115
45.94
0.00
311.44
0.00
3196
19
S7
Lynchburg
6.791
6.78
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
*9/1-4/30
106
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.941
0,00
114.83
0100
3829
1
S7
Autryville
5.43
5.43
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
2/15-6/30
104
0
20
Irrig.
84
33.55
0.00
182.19
O.0
3829
1
87
Autryville
5.43
5.43
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*911-4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.62
0.00
90.23
0.00
3829
2
S7
Norfolk
5.53
5,53
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
brig,
Ill
44.34
0.00
245.14
0.00
3829
2
S7
Norfolk
5.53
5.53
Wheat, Grain
60bu.
*9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
110.45
0.00
3829
3
S7
Norfolk
5.63
5.63
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
D
1 20
Irrig,
I Ill
44.34
0.00
249,62
0.00
3829
3
S7
Norfolk
5.63
5.63
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
*9/1-4130
125
0
0
brig.
50
19.97
0.00
112.44
0.00
3829
4
S7
Autryville
4.73
4.73
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
2/15-6/30
104
0
20
Irrig.
84
33.55
0.00
158.71
0.00
3829
4
S7
Autryville
4,73
4.73
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*9/1-4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.62
0,00
78.60
0.00
3829
5
S7
Autryville
3.37
3.37
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
2/15-6/30
104
0
20
Irrig.
84
33.55
0.00
113.07
0.00
3829
5
S7
Autryville
3.37
3.37
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*9/1-4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.62
0,00
56.00
0.00
3829
6
S7
Autryville
3.86
3.86
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
2115-6/30
104
0
20
Irrig.
84
33.55
0.00
129.52
0:
3829
6
S7
Autryville
3.86
3.86
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*9/1-4130
104
0
0
Irrig.
42
16,62
0.00
64.14
0.00
3829
7
S7
Autryville
3,04
3.04
Com, Grain
85 bu.
2/15-6/30
104
0
20
Irrig.
84
33.55
0.00
102.00
0.00
3829
7
S7
Autryville
3.04
3.04
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*9/l-4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.62
0.00
50.51
0.00
3829
8
S7
Autryville
2,10
2.10
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
2/15-6/30
104
0
20
Irrig.
84
33.55
0.00
70.46
0.00
3829
8
S7
Autryville
2.10
2.10
Wheat, Grain
45 bu,
*9/1.4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.62
0.00
34.90
0.00
3829
9
S7
Autryville
2.43
2.43
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
2/15-6/30
104
0
20
Irrig.
84
33,55
0.60
81.53
0,00
3829 19
S7
Autryville
2.43
2.43
Wheat, Grain
45 bu,
*9/1-4/30 1
104 1
0 1
0
Irrig.
42
16.62
0.00
40.38
0.00
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/11/2007 WUF Page Page 2 of 5

Waste Utilization Table
Year I
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
(lbs/A)
PA
ManureA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Req'd
Nutrient
Applied
NutrientA
pplied
pplied
(acre)
Applied
(acre)
Applied
(Field)
Applied
(Field) .
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
Tract
Field
Source
]A
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Applic.
Method
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
'tons
1000 gals
tons
gallons5,409.24
gallons
No
4,004.(;4
gallons
-1,404.60
aai, .� ,.. ded,
ions
H Ii} ily8
0.00
Total Produced, tons
SD
0.00
,.gym
Balance, tons
°�I_°i't#
0.00
[Motes: 1. In the tract colurrut, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/11/2007 WUI' Page Page 3 of 5

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Appbe.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbslA)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbslA)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
f
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
3186
10
S7
Autryville
6.93
6.93
Wheat, Grain
45 bu,
*911-4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.93
0.00
172.73
O.DO
3186
10
S7
Autryville
6.93
6,93
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu,
411-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.94
0,00
276.81
0.00
3186
11
S7
Autryville
6.64
6.64
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*9/1-4/30
104
0
0
Inig.
62
24.93
0.00
165.50
0.00
3186
11
S7
Autryville
6,64
6.64
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu,
4/1-9115
100
0
0
1 Irrig.
100
39.94
0.00
265.23
0.00
3186
12
S7
Autryville
7.52
7.52
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*9/1-4130
104
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.93
0.00
197.44
0.0
3196
12
S7
Autryville
7.52
7.52
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
4/1-9115
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.94
0.00
300.38
0.00
3186
13
S7
Autryville
7.52
7.52
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*9/1-4/30
104
0
0
brig.
62
24.93
0.00
187.44
0.00
3186
13
S7
Autryville
7,52
7.52
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.94
0.00
300,38
0.00
3186
14
S7
Autryville
3.94
3.94
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*9/1-4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.93
0.00
98,21
0.00
3186
14
S7
Autryville
3,94
3.94
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig,
100
39.94
0.00
157.38
0.00
3196
15
S7
Autryville
3.22
3.22
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*9/1-4130
104
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.93
0.00
80.26
0.00
3186
15
S7
Autryville
3.22
3.22
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
411-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.94
0.00
128.62
0.00
3186
16
S7
Lynchburg
6,78
6.78
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
*9/1-4130
106
0
0
Irrig.
64
25.40
0.00
172,24
0.00
3186
16
S7
Lynchburg
6,78
6.79
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9115
151
0
0
Irrig.
151
60,32
0,00
408.94
0.00
3186
17
S7
Lynchburg
6,30
6.30
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
49/1-4130
106
0
0
Irrig.
64
25,40
0.00
160.05
O.r
3186
17
S7
Lynchburg
6,30
6.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
151
0
0
Irrig.
151
60.32
0.00
379,99
0.00
3186
18
S7
Lynchburg
6.30
6.30
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
*911-4/30
106
0
0
Irrig.
64
25.40
0.00
160.05
0.00
3186
18
S7
Lynchburg
6.30
6.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
151
0
0
Irrig.
151
60,32
0.00
379.99
0.00
3186
19
S7
Lynchburg
6.78
6,78
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
*9/1-4130
106
O
0
Irrig.
64
25.40
0.00
172.24
0.00
3186
19
S7
Lynchburg
6.78
6.78
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu,
4/1-9/15
151
0
0
Irrig.
151
60.32
0.00
408.94
0.00
3829
1
S7
Autryville
5.43
5.43
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*9/1-4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.93
. 0.00
135.34
0.00
[782971
I
S7
Autryville
5.43
5.43
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
IOD
39.94
0.00
216.90
0.00
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/11/2007 WUT Page Page 4 of 5

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Traci
Field
Source
Ill
soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
'(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure _
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tuns
3829
2
S7
Norfolk
5.53
5.53
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
*9l1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig,
75
29.96
0.00
165.67
0.00
3829
2
S7
Norfolk
5,53
5.53
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9115
137
0
0
Irrig.
1371
54.72
0.00
302.62
0.00
3829
3
S7
Norfolk
5.63
5.63
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
*911-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig:
75
29.96
0.00
168.66
0.00
3829
3
S7
Norfolk
5.63
5.63
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
411-9115
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
54.72
0.00
308.09
0.00
3829
4
S7
Autryville
4,73
4.73
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*9114130
104
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.93
0.00
117.90
0.0
3829
4
S7
Autryville
4.73
4.73
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
411-9115
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.94
0,00
188.94
0.00
3829
5
S7
Autryville
3.37
3.37
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*911-4130
104
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.93
0.00
84.00
0,00
3829
5
S7
Autryville
3.37
3.37
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crap
25 bu.
4/1-9115
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.94
0.00
134.61
0.00
3829
6
S7
Autryville
3,86
3,86
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*911-4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.93
0.00
96.21
0.00
3829
6
S7
Autryville
3.86
3.86
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
t00
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.94
0,00
154.18
0.00
3829
7
S7
Auttyville
3.04
3.04
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*9/1-4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.93
0.00
75.77
0.00
3829
7
S7
Autryville
3.04
3.04
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.94
0,00
121.43
0.00
3829
8
S7
Autryville
2.10
2.10
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*9l1-4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.93
0.00
52.34
0.00
3829
8
S7
Autryville
2.10
2.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
411-9115
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.94
0.00
83.89
0.00
3829
9
S7
Autryville
2.43
2.43
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
*911-4/30
104
0
0
Irrig,
62
24.93
0.00
60.57
0.{
3829
9
T-S7
Autryville
2.43
2.43
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.94
0.00
97.06
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
7,126.99
�t r
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
4,004.64
=€ E i'.ri.'
Balance, 1000 gallons
-3,122.35
g b.e e: jai
Total Applied, tans
€1�$
0.00
Total Produced, tons
�i
0.00
Balance, tons
�t'�r}°1
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract colunm, --• symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/11/2007
WUT Page Page 5 of 5

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
3186
10
Autryville
0.60
1.0
3186
11 jAutryville
0.60
1.0
3186
12
Autryville
0.60
1.0
3186
13
Autrwille
0.60
1.0
3186
14
Autryville
0.60
1.0
3186
15
Autryville
0.60
1.0
3186
16
Lynchburg
0.50
1.0
3186
17
Lynchburg
0.50
1.0
3186
i8
Lynchburg
0.50
1.0
3186
19
Lynchburg
0.50
1.0
3829
1
Autryville
0.60
1.0
3829
2
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
3829
3Nor-folk
0.50
1.0
3829
4
Autryville
0.60
1.0
3829
5
Autryville
0.60
1.0
3829
6
Autryville
0.60
1.0
3829
7
Autryville
0.60
1.0
3829
8
Autryville
0.60
l.0
3829
9
utryville
0.60
1.0
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 4/11/2007 1AF Page Page I of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual sunumry of the nutrient management plan
developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan.
Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results, The
quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of other
nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized
to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so
as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,
additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
3196
10
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
'6.93
•9/1-4/30
Supplied B=
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
utryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
45 bu.
07-14-04
rvlanure
104
57
142
13
1
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
23 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
571
142
13
1
2
0
0
Tract
Field
3186
10
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
,acres
App. Period
6.93
2/15-6/30
Su liedB
"''�
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
85 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
84
46
115
10
0
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
37 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
46
115
10
0
2
01
0
Tract
Field
3186
11
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
6.64
•9/1-4130
Supplied By:
�_
�.�
�=�
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
01
0
01
0
RYE I Sample
Date
45 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
104
57
142
13
1
2
0
0
P Removal Rating
23 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
57
142
13
1
2
0
0
Tract
Field
3186
11
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
6.64
2/15-6/30
Supplied B
PP Y�
a R-
-
'
r�"���
-
-- �-
CROP
Com, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
85bu.
07-14-04
Manure
84
46
115
10
0
2
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
1 37 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
1 0
461
115
10
0
2
0
0
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/11/2007 NMR Page Page 1 of 12

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbslA)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
318b
12
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres ?.pp-
Period
7.52
y 9/1-4130
Supplied By:
».,
� �t
z-
�z�
M
-_��.
R �. 3.
-� � -
�
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample
Date
45 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
104
57
142
13
1
2
00
val
Rating
23 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
57
142
l3
l
2
0
0
E
Field
3186
12
RegdNutrients
104
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
App.
Period
7.52
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
Mw
IN.W.
U—M �
0
31 - . -- .
-
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
20
0
- 0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
85 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
84
46
115
10
0
2
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
37 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
46
115
10
0
2
0
0
Tract
Field
3186
13
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
7.52
•911-4130
Supplied By:M�
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
45 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
104
57
142
13
l
2
0
0
P Removal Rating
23 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
57
142
13
1
2
0
0
Tract
Field
3186
13
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
A Period
App.
7.52
2/15-6/30
Supplied B
PP Y�
_F`
��
=mow
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sample
Date
85 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
84
46
115
10
0
2
0
0
EPR.,-tival
Rating
37 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
46
1l5
10
0
2
0
0
Field
3186
14
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
60
0
0
0
0
0
App. Period
3.94
2/15-6130
Supplied B
-- � _;
� ��.a
- `'
F�...�"
-_.`fie'..
a
�.r. R:
M
0M
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
E Sample Date
85 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
84
46
115
10
0
2
0
0
emoval
EP
Rating
37 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
46
55
10
0
2
0
0
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/11/2007 NMR Page Page 2 of 12

Nutrient Management Reconnmendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
3186
14
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
60
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
A Period
PP•
3.94
* 9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
a �win
��
�r
-t
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
45 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
104
571
142
131
1
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
23 ibs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
57
82
13
1
2
0
0
Tract
Field
3186
15
Rcq'd Nutrients
104
0
60
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App. Period
3.22
•9/1-4130
Supplied By:"=-
mftl;00
T�j
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
45 hu.
07-14-04
Manure
104
57
142
13
1
2
01
0
P Removal
I Rating
23 lbslac,
Medium
BALANCE
0
57
82
13
1
2
0
0
Tract
Field
3186
15
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
60
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
3.22
2115-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Auuyville
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
85 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
84
46
115
10
0
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
37 lbs/ac•
Medium
BALANCE
0
46
55
10
0
2
0
0
Tract
Field
3186
16
Req'd Nutrients
106
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App. Period
6.78
-9/1-413D
Supplied By:
+
Um
=
.
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Lynchburg
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
55 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
106
5811
145
13
1
2
0
D
P Removal
I Rating
28 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
58
95
13
1
2
0
0
Tract
Field
3186
16
Req'd Nutrients
135
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App, Period
6.78
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
X-0-0
A � �
WOMEN
=441-
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Lynchburg
Residual
2()l
0
0
01
0
0
01
0
RYE Sample
Date
125 bu.
1 07-14-04
N11 ure
115
63
157
14
1
1 3
1
0
PRemoval
I Rating
55lbslac.
edium
BALANCE
0
63
]07
14
1
3
1
0
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/11/2007 NMR Page Page 3 of 12

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
3 ! 86
17
Req'd Nutrients
106
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I A
PP. Period
6.34
•9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
ems..
MS
s
-`�
°��-�: ��
�-':
�
--p �.
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Lynchburg
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sample
Date
55 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
106
5$
145
13
1
2
0
0
oval
rAcres
Rating
28 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
58
95
13
1
2
0
0
Field
3186
17
Req'd Nutrients
135
0
50
0
0
0
0
a
App, Period
6.30
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
wa
r
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Lynchburg
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
125 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
115
63
157
14
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
55 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
63
107
14
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
3186
18
Req'd Nutrients
106
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
6.30
•9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
Fes
'
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Lynchburg
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
55 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
106
58
145
13
1
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
28 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
58
125
13
1
2
0
0
Tract Field
3186
18
Req'd Nutrients
135
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App. Period
6-30
2/15-6130
Supplied B
x i
v
`07
--
ze
� m w s
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Lynchburg
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
125 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
115
63
157
14
1
3
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
55 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
63
137
14
l
3
1
0
Tract
Field
3186
19
Req'd Nutrients
106
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
6.78
-911-4130
Supplied By:
e
a Y4N �
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Lynchburg
Residual
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
55 bu,
07-14-04
Manure
106
58
145
131
1
2
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
1 28 lbslac.
Imedium
BALANCE
1 0
58
125
13
l
2
0
0
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/11/2007 NMR Page Page 4 of 12

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
]
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
3186 19
Req'd Nutrients
135
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
APp- Period
6.79 2/15-6/30
Supplied B
PP Y
t
p "
—
-
e_=fie
: —
-- f'
� 'i
fam
''
�.r Mal
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Lynchburg
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
125 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
115
63
157
14
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
55 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
63
137
14
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
3829
1
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
110
0
0
0
0
1
Acres
App. Period
5.43
2/15-6/30
Supplied B
I=
24
Oft
`0�
PW '
-• %
N
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0•
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
85 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
84
46
115
10
0
2
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
37lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
46
5
.10
0
2
0
-1
Tract
Field
3829
1
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
110
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
5.43
*9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
R
r- :
=YM
iE�
ma
��
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Date
45bu.
07-14-04
Manure
104
57
14213
1
2
0
0
FRYESample
oval
Rating
23 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
57
32
13
I
2
0
0
t
Field
3829
2
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
App. Period
5.53
*9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
� �� "
`�-
�
~
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ple Date
60 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
125
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
Rating
30 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
RRemoval
Field
3829
2
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
p. Period
5.53
2l15-6130
Supplied By:
�
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
115 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
Ill
60
152
14
1
3
0
0
P Removal Rating
51 lbs/ac.
Medium
I BALANCE
1 0
60
152
14
1
3
0
-1
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/11/2007 NMR Page Page 5 of 12

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
j
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Fietd
3829
3
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres I
App. Period
5.63
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
MWEREM
- 0-M
ftlri
W.
MKQWA
Pffi'M
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sample
Date
115 bu.,
07-14-04
Manure
111
60
152
14
1
3
0
0val
Rating
51 lbs/ac.
edium
BALANCE
0
60
152
14
1
3
0
-1
E
Field
3829
3
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
App. Period
5.63
*9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
'NEz N
Woia
W `
; �
04
�
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sample Date
60 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
125
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
val
Rating
30 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
EPR.-,
Field
3829
4
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
App. Period
4.73
2115-6/30
Supplied By:
'M- �
I
_:^Y�r
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sample
Date
85 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
84
46
115
10
0
2
0
0
EPRe-oval
Rating
37lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
46
115
10
0
2
0
-1
Field
3829
4
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
00
0
0
0
0
App, Period
4.73
*9/1-4130
Supplied By:
MEm
MOM-
-a
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sample
Date
45 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
104
57
142
13
1
2
0
0
EPR.moval
Rating
23 lbs/ac.
edium
BALANCE
0
57
142
13
1
2
0
0
Field
3829
5
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
80
0
0
0
0
0
A Period
PP
3.37
*9/1-4130
Su lied B
pp y:
^
R
."
7-7-101,251
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sampte
Date
45 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
104
57
142
13
1
2
0
0
P Removal I Rating
23 ibs/ac.
ledium
BALANCE
1 01
57
62
13
11
21
01
0
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/1 t/2007 NMR Page Page 6 of 12

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(Ibs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
3829
5
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
80
0
0
0
0
1
Acres
App. Period
3.37-
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
ON `--
%� "`
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
85 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
84
46
115
10
01
2
01
0
P Removal
I Rating
37 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
46
35
10
0
2
0
-1
Tract
Field
3829
6
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
110
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
3.86
*9/1-4130
Supplied B�
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
45 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
104
57
142
13
1
2
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
23 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
57
32
13
1
2
0
0
Tract
Field
3829
6
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
110
0
❑
0
0
1
Acres
App. Period
3.86
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
❑
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
le Date
85 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
84
46
115
10
0
2
0
0
RAppp.
Rating
37 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
46
5
10
0
2
0
-1
Field
3829
7
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
110
0
0
0
0
0
Period
3.04
*911-4/30
Supplied By:
M'
�
DR -
* 2
"_ -
1,9-0-
�-:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autrwille
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
mple Date
45 bu-
07-14-04
Manure
104
57
142
13
1
2
0
0l
B
Rating
23 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
57
32
13
l
2
0
0
Field
3829
7
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
110
0
0
0
0
1
pp. Period
3.04
2115-6/30
Supplied By:
''
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
❑
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
()1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
85 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
84
46
115
10
0
2
0
0
P Removal I Rating
37 lbs/ac.
edium
BALANCE
0
46
5
10
01
2
D
-1
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/1 1/2007 NMR Page Page 7 of 12

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
]
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(IbsIA)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
3829
8
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
110
0
0
0
0
1
Acres
App. Period
2.10
2/15-6130
Supplied B�
PP Y
t«.dn�_W._
"
WR
_s
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sample
Date
85 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
84
46
115
t0
0
2
0
0val
Rating
37 ibs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
46
5
10
0
2
0
-1
E
Field
3829
8
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
110
0
0
0
0
0
App. Period
- 2.10
*9/1-4130
Supplied By:
A
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
'0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
Sample Date
45 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
104
57
142
13
1
2
0
0
Rating
23lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
57
32
13
1
2
0
0
EPRcm�val
Field
3829
9
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
App. Period
2A3
*911-4/30
Supplied By:
-MUe
r'
_
`
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Auwyville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
45 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
104
57
142
13
1
2
01
0
P Removal
I Rating
23 lbs/ac_
Medium
BALANCE
0
57
142
13
1
2
0
0
Tract
Field
3829
9
Req'd Nutrients
104
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
2.43
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
���:
- .��,
��
;;�
' -
.�
r
am= n
CROP
Corn Grain
Starter
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
85 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
84
46
115
10
0
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
37 lbslac.
edium
BALANCE
01
46
115
10
0
2
4
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Primed: 4/11/2007 NMR Page Page 8 of 12

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
318fi
10
Req'd Nutrients
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
6-93
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
25 bu.
07.14-04
Manure
100
551
137
12
0
2
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
20 €bslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
55
137
121
0
2
0
0
Tract
Field
3186
11
Req'd Nutrients
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
6.64
411-9/15
Supplied By:
�>
�-
m
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
25 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
10o
55
137
12
0
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
20 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
55
137
12
0
2
0
0
Tract
Field
3196
12
Req'd Nutrients
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
APP• Period
7.52
4/1-9/15
Supplied BY
-r"5.�
r�-
.ms
.M���»e�
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Auuyville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
25 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
100
55
137
12
0
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
20 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
55
137
12
0
2
0
0
Tract
Field
3186
13
Req'd Nutrients
l00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres A Periodaa
App,
7.52
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
,�,
-SEW �
s c=r
?
r
c�
,
CROP
Soybeans, Nianured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
25bu.
07-14-04
Manure
]00
55
137
12
0
2
0
0
P Removal Rating
20 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
55
137
12
0
2
0
0
Tract
Field
3186
14
Req'd Nutrients
100
0
60
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
3.94
4/1-WO
Supplied By:
:
r
_:� �:
-
z
.
i ?i
�
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
25 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
too
55
137
12
0
2
4
0
P Removal Rating
20 lbslac.
ledium
I BALANCE
0
55
77
12
0
2
0
0
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/11/2007 NMR Page Page 9 of 12

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
3186
15
Req'd Nutrients
100
0
60
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App.
Period 1
3.22
4/1-9115
Supplied By:
SSW
_
s ,s_
t n' �r
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
25 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
100
55
137
12
0
2
01
0
P Removal
I Rating
20 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
01
55
77
12
0
2
0
0
Tract
Field
3186
16
Req'd Nutrients
151
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres "Pp
Period
6.78
411-9/15
Supplied By:
a
.� .__ I
"•
��
'� �
t om ;;
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Lynchburg
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
39 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
151
82
207
18
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
31 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
82
157
18
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
3186
17
Req'd Nutrients
151
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
6.30
41i-9115
Supplied By:
�
.iw P
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Lynchburg
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample
Date
39 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
151
82
207
18
1
3
I
0
val
E
Rating
31 lbslac.
Medium
13ALANCE
0
82
157
18
1
3
1
0
Field
3186
18
Req'd Nutrients
151
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
App. Period
6.30
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
MUM,.
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
Soil Series
Lynchburg
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
39 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
151
821
207
18
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
31 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
82
187
18
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
3186
19
Req'd Nutrients
151
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
Period
App. Pe
6.78
4/1-9l15
Supplied By:
�pr,r,°�
� a
.:
,�
�� �
a�
�.v
��
��- O
w .
�
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Lynchburg
Residual
D
0
0
0
0
01
01
0
RYE I Sample
Date
39 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
151
82
207
18
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
31 lbslac.
edium
BALANCE
0
82
187
18
1
3
11
0
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/11/2007 NMR Page Page 10 of 12

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
FF,eld
3829
l
Req'd Nutrients
100
0
110
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
5.43
411-9I15
Supplied By:
W
�
� W �-
�
MINE
i=
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
25 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
100
155
137
12
0
2
01
0
P Removal
I Rating
20 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
55
27
12
0
2
0
0
Tract
Field
3829
2
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
A Period
5.53
411-9/15
Supplied B
m
0"
? �MM
A&Zv.
_mow
WW
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
35 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
137
75
188
17
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
28 lbs/ac.
i tedium
BALANCE
0
75
188
17
1
3
1
0
Tract Field
3824
3
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
5.63
411-9/15
Supplied B
CROP
Soybeans, Manured',
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Pert.
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
35 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
137
75
188
17
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
28 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE'.
0
75
188
17
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
3829
4
Req'd Nutrients
100
0
0
01
0
0
.0
0
Acres I
App. Period
4.73
411-9115
Supplied By:
a
.
51 _�
0
V�
� _
9= 207``
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
25 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
100
55
137
12
0
2
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
20lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
55
137
12
O
2
0
0
Tract
Field
3829
5
Req'd Nutrients
100
0
80
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
3.37
411-9/15
Supplied By:
_
M
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
ol
0
Commercial Fert_
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
25 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
100
55
137
12
O
2
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
20 lbs/ac.
edium
BALANCE
1 0
55
57
12
Q
2
0
0
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/11/2007 NMR Page Page 11 of 12

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(1bs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
3829
6
Req'd Nutrients
100
0
110
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
3.86
4/1-9115
Supplied B
a}�ra. «I»
m
. .`":�
�^.
��?,'G-�";. _"
_._... �..
�I-RI
�w0}
r� - 'C %.riu
1 "—
;.3"�
2.
"?
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CommerCial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sail Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
le Date
25 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
100
55
137
12
0
2
0
0
DRemoval
Rating
20 lbs/ac-
tedium
BALANCE
0
55
27
12
0
2
0
0
Field
3829
7
Req'd Nutrients
100
0
110
0
0
0
0
0
. Period
3.04
4/1-9115
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sail Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample
Date
25 bu.
07.14-04
Manure
100
55
137
12
0
2
0
0
EPR.,-.val
Rating
20 lbs/ac.
edium
BALANCE
0
55
27
12
0
2
0
0
Field
3829
8
Req'd Nutrients
100
0
110
0
0
0
0
0
App. Period
2.10
4I1-9/15
Supplied B
PP Y_"
2 .
N
_ .... _
`'" !
r"
N' _
_ a
-'".
< -
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fett.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample Date
25 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
100
55
137
12
0
2
0
0
EPR.,mo'wal
Rating
201bs/ac.
edium
BALANCE
0
55
27
12
0
2
0
0
Field
3829
9
Req'dNutrients
i00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
App_ Period
2.43
411-9/15
Supplied By:
r
- _
�
M50UMN,
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commemiai Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Autryville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sample
LPR.ernoval
Date
25 bu.
07-14-04
Manure
100
55
137
12
0
2
0
0
Rating
20 lbs/ac.
iledium
BALANCE
0
55
137
12
0
2
0
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/11/2007 NMR Page Page 12 of 12

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of
copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth.
Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and
zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we
can predict life of the site for waste disposal
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of
lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production .
Required 4nil Test Values
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
Lime Recom.
(tons/acre)
Cu-I
Copper Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc Recommendation
3186
10
Corn, Grain
6.4
0.0
270
None
396
None
3186
10
Wheat, Grain
6.4
0.0
270
None
396
None
3186
10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 1
6,4
0.0
270
None
996
None
3186
11
Com, Grain
6.4
0.0
270
None
396
Nune
3186
11
Wheat, Grain
6,4
0.0
270
None
396
None
3186
11
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.4
0.0
270
None
396
None
3186
12
Corn, Grain
6.5
0.0
271
None
389
None
3186
12
Wheat, Grain
6.5
0.0
27t
None
389
None
3186
12
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.5
0.0
271
None
389
None
3186
13
Corn, Grain
6.5
0.0
271
None
389
None
3186
13
Wheat, Grain
6.5
0.0
271
None
389
None
3186
13
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.5
0.0
271
None
389
None
3186
14
Com, Grain
5.9
0.0
333
None
4pg
None
3186
14
Wheat, Grain
5.9
0.0
333
None
4()9
None
3196
14
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.9
0.0
333
None
409
None
3196
15
Cam, Grain
5.9
0.0
333
None
409
None
3186
15
Wheat, Grain
5.9
0.0
333
None
409
None
3196
15
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.9
0.0
333
None
409
None
3186
16
Com, Grain
5.8
0.4
335
None
417
None
3196
16
Wheat, Grain
5.8
0.0
335
None
417
None
3186
16
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.8
0.0
335
None
417
None
3186
17
Com, Grain
5.8
0.4
335
None
417
None
3186
17
Wheat, Grain
5.8
0.0
335
None
417
i None
---------------------------------------------------------------------•----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•-------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 STV Page Page I of

Required Soil Test Values
Tract
Field
Crop
pR
Lime Recom.
(tonstacre)
Cu-I
Copper Recommendation
Zn-1
Zinc Recommendation
3186
17
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5,8
0.0
335
None
417
None
3186
18
Corn, Grain
6,0
0.0
339
None
348
None
3186
18
Wheat, Grain
6.0
0.0
339
None
348
None
3186
18
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.0
0.0
339
None
34g
None
3186
19
Corn, Grain
6.0
0.0
339
None
348
None
3186
19
Wheat, Grain
6.0
0.0
339
None
348
None
3186
19
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.0
1 0.0
339
None
34g
None
3829
1
Corn, Grain
5.2
0.9
180
None
172
None
3829
1
Wheat, Grain
5.2
0.0
180
None
172
None
3829
1
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.2
0.0
180
None
172
None
3829
2
Corn, Grain
5.7
0.7
277
None
330
None
3829
2
Wheat, Grain
5.7
0.0
277
None
330
None
3829
2
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.7
0.0
277
None
330
None
3829
3
Corn, Grain
5.7
0.7
277
None
330
None
3829
3
Wheat, Grain
5.7
0.0
277
None
330
None
3829
3
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.7
0.0
277
None
330
None
3829
4
Corn, Grain
5.7
0.7
277
None
330
None
3829
4
Wheat, Grain
5.7
0.0
277
None
330
None
3829
4
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.7
0.0
277
None
330
None
3829
5
Corn, Grain
5.7
0.5
227
None
237
None
3829
5
Wheat, Grain
5.7
0.0
227
None
237
None
3829
5
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.7
0.0
227
None
237
None
3829
6
Corn, Grain
5.2
0.9
180
None
172
None
3829
6
Wheat, Grain
5.2
0.0
180
None
172
None
3829
6
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.2
0.0
180
None
172
None
3829
7
Corn, Grain
5.2
0.9
180
None
172
None
3829
7
Wheat, Grain
5.2
0.0
180
None
172
None
3829
7
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.2
0.0
180
None
172
None
3829
8
Corn, Grain
5.2
0.9
180
None
172
None
3829
8
Wheat, Grain
5.2
0.0
190
None
177
None
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 STV Page Page 2 of

Required Soil Test Values
"tract
Field
Crop
PH
Lime Recom.
(tonstacre)
Cu-t
Copper Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc Recommendation
3829
8
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.2
0,0
180
None
172
None
3829
9
Corn, Grain
6.2
0.0
288
None
368
None
3829
9
Wheat, Grain
6.2
0.0
288
None
36g
None
3829
9
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
1 6.2
0.0
288
None
368
None
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed; 04-11-2007 STV Page Page 3 of 3

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source,
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray frelds'should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes,
phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lblac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Com 120 bu
150
'13.16
54.16
108.31
162.47
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
27.08
54.16
81.24
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
50.77
101.55
15232
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------g— ----------------
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 Sludge Page Page 1 of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
I Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
1011
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
58
1
2
98
1
3
135
1
4
173
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
149
l
8
118
1
9
126
1
10
133
1
11
141
1
12
148
2
1
155
2
2
165
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
180
2
6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
149
2
11
119
2
12
88
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 Capacity Page Page 1 of 1

a I .
Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
---••----------------- ----
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/11/2007 Specification Page 1

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 19 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animalwaste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
------------- ---------------•----------------------------------------------•-•------------------- p ---
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/11/2007 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitoredand alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ •-----
234263 Database Version 3-1 Date Printed: 4/11/2007 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 16, 17, 18, 19
Corn 1: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2, 3
Corn: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leaching
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --•---------------------------
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Corn: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leaching
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbslacre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 16, 17, 18, 19
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The remaining N
should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant
samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely
management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2, 3
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 112" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbslacre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining
N should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type.
Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat.
Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU.Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining
N should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type.
Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat.
Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 16, 17, 18, 19
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, low -leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 24 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2, 3
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medium leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbslacre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 Crop Note Page Page 3 of

The following crop Mote applies to field(s): 1, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medium leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbslacre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
---• ------------ ------ ----- --- -- ------
234263 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 Crop Note Page Page 4 of 4

31- q`1— bf 6k%zVrm q arf& er. ookl4 Si)e of )&swr. Aro^
ru&fv rccyc(k Iu. (eAoU t,.e(s4)

Sra v c Se, )\,* StcN be' wt- v-

;.ram
At
VIIk�

,S4-'1 !—�Ucl��iv� �fnJa..yv.A p0�,.�l�Sl-y'{p�yy` n"�,r� ,�- �-
y ��
�# a

_. ti

31-97-211199-Location of ruptured recycle line and adjacent drainage diversion.

4�
m

,� u.t _
�0• `�

31-97-2/1/99-Ruptured wastewater recycle pipe.

-W -

31-97-2/l/99-Path of runoff through drainage diversion adjacent to lagoon.

4 -�. -_ ,
-_,._
-----
.�-
.. .
n� ��:
.ri i 3 �`
..
��
�t�
IFr_ �
�,'
'6��' ..
. r'l'Ywi"
..
7�' _
.. _ � .: _
1 ,f '�

31-97-2/1/99-Path of runoff through drainage diversion on northwest side of lagoon.

31-97-2/ 1 /9 led area.

31-97-2/ 1 /- ed area.

31-97-2/1/99-Sample Point #2 in Buckskin Swamp.

F-i
FA

31-97-2/1/99-Buckskin Swamp downstream of discharge point.

Billy Kilpatrick Fw' rms 3,1-97
. C1
876 ft. 5.53 ac (,p2 `o —
...
Cl. p6 671ft 3.86 ac.
G•
p7 510 ft. 3.04 ac.
p8 322 tt. 2.10 ac..
Q
m
ac. p16
ac. p 17
,0 ac. p18
►.78 ac. p19
Ni
S
L

r
(Mulfiplerwm bheM may be needed) HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
�i Hard Hose Traveling Gun System ! 3 F a q
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm number (identification) 31 ` 0 9 2 Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation X Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes _� # Exterior lanes i'?S'9 feet] Length of pull(Li)
# Interior lanes 2 # Exterior lanes 8 2 & [feet] Length of pull(1.2)
# Interior lanes --3_ # Exterior lanes '93 [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter �,n [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
S. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants Single hydrant -)L Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L_) Interior or I Exterior Oane/hydrant)
_,1 '�- (a) Acres start end of pull from Table FF 9a Column
77 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (M)
{Pull lengthS S�K [feet] X Wetted width [feet]} / 43,560
0 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table .EE,72 Column c--
!�t' Total acres for travel lane length (1.1) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or 2 Exterior (lane/hydrant)
—/z i j (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E F 90 L Column _
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2)
(Pull length&Wo [feet] X Wetted width [feet]} / 43,560
rJ (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table 0 Column l-
Total acres for travel lane length (1-2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
,/- 41 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
9_ (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3)
[Pull lengthg$ 7 [feet] X Wetted widtlltl.' [feet]} / 43,560
0_ (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table F 7 9 ) Column C.
S e is j Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
,z� (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X # Lanes = Acres
1S-2 (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X # Lanes = Acres.
,L 3 (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres
Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: ` Date:
Signature 4 technical specialist
}'S

(Muldplq worksheets may be needed)
r
HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
WO
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm number (identification) . Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes 7.2 2 feet] Length of pull(B)
# Interior lanes �_ # Exterior lanes Gi 0 [feet] Length of pull(1-.2)
2? # Interior lanes _j(p # Exterior lanes ( 7/ [feet] Length of pull(B)
4. Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
S. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] 9-D [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants Single hydrant -X_- Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel gulf for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L-) Interior or - Exterior (lane hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table E2L Column
4 o (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Li)
{Pull length Z [feet] X Wetted widt L3 ~ [feet]) / 43,560
_0 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column C-
q._�3 Total acres for travel lane length (U) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
.1-12 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E F 0. Column P_
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2)
(Pull lengthy [feet] X Wetted width [feet]] / 43,560
0 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Et 2 0 Column G
Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L_) Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
rL (a) Acres start end of pull from Table f S� Column C_
2. (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3)
{Pull lengthy [feet] X Wetted width,2 � [feet]} / 43,560
0 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table, Column C
F Total acres for travel lane length (1.3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the Geld. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
LL, ) 3 (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X # Lanes = Acres
2 3 7 (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X # Lanes = Acres
3, 8i.p (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres
IL, 7 (p Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 80
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: x12, L .-_r Date:
Signature € technical specialist
rs

r
(Multiple worksheets may be needed)
HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm number (identification) Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes_ # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes Sir? feet] Length of pull(Ll)
# Interior lanes __ # Exterior lanes 3.2 2 [feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior lanes �_ # Exterior lanes yl -3 [feet] Length of pull(13)
4. Wetted diameter, Z3L [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel Mane length (L-) I Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
U (a (a) Acres start end of pull from Table FL i Column
S8 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1)
{Pull lengthL/d [feet] X Wetted width 21�0 [feet]} / 43,560
_ 0 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table EX 50 Column C
-3, A Total acres for travel lane length (Ll) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
7 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table - 4;r Column
r G a (b) Acres middle portion of pull (1.2)
{Pull length3"� [feet] X Wetted widthD [feet]1/43,560.
_ 6 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Fs Column L
a• 10 Total acres for travel lane length (1-2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L_) Interior or 9 Exterior (lane/hydrant)
44 7 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Er 10 Column ! ,
?6 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3)
(Pull length`t13 [feet] X Wetted width o 7 [feet]} / 43,560
iD(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table.Et 4 b Column G
a, q 3 Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
n "-(a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X # Lanes = Acres
L D (b) Acres per travel lane length (1.2) X # Lanes = Acres
(c) Acres per travel lane length (13) X # Lanes = Acres
Total CAW W wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 80
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by.., i e -- L. Date: 14,c:
Signature 46 technical specialist

(Multiple worksheets may be needed)
-)i P.
HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm number (identification) Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes L— # Exterior lanes !AL& feet] Length of pull(Ll)
I # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes / E;L [feet] Length of pull(12)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes /j 10 [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter 22 0 [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing ; `� Hydrant spacing [feet] ��, [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants
7. head the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L-) Interior or /V Exterior pane/hydrant)
r 6 q (a) Acres start end of pull from Tabled Column 6
b, �2 1 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll)
{Pull iengthbk ( [feet] X Wetted width 2.S 7 [feet] } / 43,560
6 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table .EE- 90 Column C-
6, q -� Total acres for travel lane length (L1) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, d Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
G (a) Acres start end of pull from Table 0 Column_
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2)
(Pull lengfh&?;� [feet] X Wetted width-�y0 [€eetl} / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table E Z 7) Column _ C
Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L_) Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(g (a) Acres start end of pull from Table )�-t!?2_ Column L
l6�( (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3)
{Pull lengthy [feet] X Wetted width 40 [feet]} / 43,560
0 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table EZ.0 Column C—
], _5 Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the Geld.
61 9 3 (a) Acres per travel Iane length (1-1) X # Lanes = Acres
&, ra 1-1. (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X # Lanes = Acres
-24 s a (c) Acres per travel lane length (1-3) X # Lanes = Acres
/, 0 � Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by r Date: !u
Signature o technical specialist
IS

ov
(Mul fple worksheets may be needed)
P
10
HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
r!
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm number (identification) Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system
3_ Number of travel lanes 1,� # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes 1; s V feet] Length of pull(L1)
—0 -_ # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes 6 0 Q [feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior lanes / 57 # Exterior lanes 43 9 [feet] Length of puU(L3)
4. Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5, Spacing 2 L_ Hydrant spacing [feet] / g [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
,1.3 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table T 10 Column Q
_ (b) Acres middle portion of pull (M)
{Pull lengtYlk2D [feet] X Wetted widths Q D [feet]] / 43,560
mil' (c) Acres stop end of pull from Tablee.1 90 Column C
2L-��-Total acres for travel lane length (L1) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, _1_� Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
L (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column b'
.= i (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2)
[Pull lengthk0 0 [feet] X Wetted width 90 [feet]) / 43,560
7 - (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table T,7J Column L
3. tq Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sisml: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, Interior or jU Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table L 4•-1 9 Column _
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3)
(Pull lengthj3 6 [feet] X Wetted width., [feet]) / 43,560
T r (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table E` 90 Column L
a. 7, Total acres for travel lane length (13) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X #Lanes = Acres
(b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X # Lanes = Acres
3.9,2 (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres
Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: f Date::: Uh
Signature 9f technical specialist
�.5

Sall
(Multiple w"ksheets may be needed)
HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
it
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm number (identification) Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation -X Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes / to # Exterior lanes /2LD feet] Length of pull(Ll)
7 # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes /.;! So [feet] Length of pull(1-2)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes /..I C-U [feet] Length of pull(B)
4. Wetted diameter 1 � Q- [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L, Interior or ) -_�p Exterior (lane/hydrant)
wee I (a) Acres start end of pull from Table LE 7.5JColumn
� 7 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll)
(Pull lengthDI 4 [feet] X Wetted width-�-� [feet]) / 43,560
O (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table E & i } Column T,
7 S Total acres for travel lane length (U) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, _.L?7 Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
Spa (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E. 7: Column
7 � (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2)
{Pull length j. Q [feet] X Wetted width a 0 d [feet]) / 43,560
_D _ (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table EI ' Column
LaO Total acres for travel lane length (U) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, 1 7 Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
.5 (� (a) Acres start end of pull from Table CI ? "Column A
-r 7 ti` (b) Acres middle portion of pull (1-3)
{Pull length!; EQ (feet] X Wetted widtt.?D 0 . [feet]( / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table fj 7S Column C,
6.3 Q Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
6. 2 (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X # Lanes = Acres
G Q (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X # Lanes = Acres
/.3a (c) Acres per travel lane length (13) X # Lanes = Acres
1 .3 Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Date: / / D
Signature ly technical specialist
15

(Malbple worksheets may be needed)
7•
HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm number (identification) . Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation * Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes. /9 # Exterior lanes. /2S0 feet] Length of pull(L1)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter ''�i [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
S. Spacing r3 _Hydrant spacing [feet] ' n [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout Y, Multiple hydrants Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L, Interior or / cf Exterior (lane/hydrant)
f (a) Acres start end of pull from Table f �� Column 6
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (LI)
{full length/ [feet]- X Wetted width,2_ [feet]} / 43,560
C (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table El: i L Column �-
Total acres for travel lane length (U) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2)
(Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]] / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L-) Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3)
{Pull length [feet] X Wetted width ffeet]} / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
(a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X #Lanes = Acres
(b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X # Lanes = Acres
(c) Acres per travel lane length (1.3) X # Lanes = Acres
Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by �� �- -. lr • Date: ! I �,
Signature 0f technical specialist

C AW \,t? Wcrlbl-- Azrc 7)0
Traveling Gun Field i7-U shed. 1'70197
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System ? a
FIELD DATA SHEET '
I . 1�1ake and model number ALr — 1 i Cj
2. Hose length bu [feet] and hose inside diameter (ID)�(inch]
3. Gun make and model number
4. Gun nozzle size [inch], 1 .�v ring orifice, taper bore orifice.
5. Gun arC an`-zle / eq'D- (degees]
5. Travel lane spacing [feet]. Indicate whether utufomt random.
Number of exterior hydrants Number of interior hydrants
7. Gun wetted diameter [feet]. measured, based on gun chart.
S. Gun pressure A&W`[psi]. UQ observed at working gauge,
determined f;om gun charts, calculated (show calculations)
* *9. Operating pressure at hose reel [psi]. observed at working gauge,
provided by owner.
"* 10. Supply line size [inch] (from pump to last hydrant).
* 11. Supply line lena-th feet (maximum pumping distance).
* * 12 Supply line type PVC, aluminum.
* ` 13. Pump rnak-z and model number
;*
lY, PElinp (.ap.a.:.iL;,
1115, E=ine make and model number
or
— l b. Electric rr:ocor hor sepi�•tyer and rprr [hp]
Note'. It is sLrcrgly recommended that ope atin� pressure . the reel an -p-.n v--gyred
b ' 911-1d dete r
Locate „ a
each hydrant on a copy of the map. Indicate the start and stop of the sprinkler 7-ir-L
for each travel lan;.: and shoe distance tra-..e1td- Shoe the local;•on of tie supply line.
Ir iCated acres %z-L", be determined b° c,'ave lane
Op --Iona: dal' ra: 'sh where possi- .
* * x Info, --,nation Eir-nished by
'L ane�or
Sim _ of 01 Fazifh Representativt
Signa: re of Techni-cp-1 Specialist
Printed Name of0-.,c, or Faziliry Representadv_ Printed rarne ofTe,:1ani:a1 Specialist
Date Date
;"* Onh•'Lie person. or persons collecting the data should sign the data sheet.

CAWMP We abl: Azrt Traveling Gun Field Dau shcct 1'20/99
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System 70
FIELD DATA SHEET
I _ Make and model number__ A(�_ � �'� �,,; u � c> 4 _
2. Hose length _ � 2 '° —[feet and hose inside diameter (ID) _[inch]
3. Gun make and model number .200-
4. Gun nozzle size ' [inch],(ring orifice, taper bore orifice.
5. Gun arc angle i n.c� [degrees]
6. Travel Iane spacing ?g1 [feet]. Indicate whether uniform, random.
Number of exterior hydrants . Number of interior hydrants
7. Gun wetted diameter 'off 9 q [feet]. 13� �j measured, based on gun chart.
8. Gun pressure [psi]. L40 observed at working gauge,
determined fiorn gun ci arts, calculated (show calculations)
* *9. Operating pressure at hose reel [psi]. observed at working gauge,
provided by m&-nlr.
"'I` lo. Supply line si?e [inch] (fiom pump to last hydrant).
` * 11. Supply line length feet (;riax murn pumping distance).
*" 12. Supply line N-De PIV" C, alurrunum.
` 13. Pump make zlld.model number
"* 14. Pump capacit';-, [gip �zj
Y ` 17. E:tC:ne rna e and model number
or
16. Electric rn ot--r ho.-se;rc.'wcr and rpr, [hp] �[ - p.<<<]
Note: It is strcrgiy recornrn4r+d_d that ope'adii, p'zss-ure at the reel any 2,-n w:- tted
' d bP field det:: mur-1,
Locate each hydrant on a cc) y of the map. Indicate the start ar., stop of the sprinkler -:irt
for each tra-, el la e and shoe distance tra`-e1>d. Sho,ly the locat:-Dln of ta_ suo>1ly line.
Irr-i ated acres v;-L be deter mdned b­ ian_
Optional da_ where possible.
* * * In o.�ation furnished by
o� and- o r
Si�atur., of Ot.r._.- agility Represen!a[i•...
Printed Name of 0-7= o:: acilin- Represen;a i.•e
Date
Signa:ure of Technic.,-' Spy ialist
Printed rime o`Tecarioal Srxialist
Date
`*x Onl-, the person or persons collecting the data should sizi the data sheet.

--Specifications-
40A PERFORMANCE GUIDE
40A X 1250' WATER -REEL PERFOR14lUCE
Inches Depth of Application
.
Nelson
Sprinkler
System
**Irrigated
Travel Speed - Feet Per Hour
Degree
�9
SR200
Pertormantro
Inlet
AREA
Rate
it NOL
PSI GPM I DIA
PSI
Width X Length
40
50
75
100
125
150
25O
M
1.29'
50
230
325
78
228 X 1364
2.1
1.7
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.3
r0.2
0.31
Ring
60
250
340
91
238 X 1369
2.2
1.8
1.2
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.36
or 1.W
70
270
355
104
249 X 1374
2.3
1.8
1.2
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.36
Taper
80
290
370
117
259 X 1390
2.4
1.9
1.3
0.9
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.35
90
310
380
131
266 X 1393
2.5
2.0
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.7
0.4
0.2
0.36
1.48"
50
300
355
89
249 X 1374
2.5
2.0
1.4
1.0
0.8
0.7
0.4
0.3
0.40
Ring
60
330
370
105
259 X 1380
2.7
2.1
1.4
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.4
0.3
0.41
or 1.Y
70
355
385
120
270 X 1385
2.8
2.2
1.5
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.4
0.3
0.40
Taper
80
300
400
135
280 X 1390
2.9
2.3
1.5
1.1
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.40
90
J 405
415
151
291 X ' 1395
2.2
2.3
1.6
1.2
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.40
1.5r
50
350
370
99
259 X 1380
2.8
2.3
1.5
1.1
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.43
Ring
66
385
390
116
273 X 1397
3.0
2.4
1.6
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.43
or 1.r
70
415
405
133
284 X 1392
3.1
2.5
1.6
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.43
Taper
80
445
420
151
294 X 1397
3.2
2.6
1.7
1.3
1.0
0.9
0.5
0.3
0.42
1.6r
50
410
390
112
273 X 1387
3.2
2.5
1.7
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.45
Ring
60
445
41D
131
287 X 1394
3.3
2.6
1.7
1.3
1.0
0.9
0.5
0.3
0.45
or 1.V
70
480
425
150
298 X 1399
3.4
2.7
1.8
1.4
1.1
0.9
0.5
0.3
0.45
Taper
Hours For 1250 Feet of Travel:
31.3
25.0
16.7
12.5
10.0
8.3
1 5.0
3.1
System Inlet pressure shown above is for Turbine Drives. Engine Drives will be approx 10 PSI lower.
•• Area covered may vary depending on wind conditions, field dimensions and use of unspecified sprinklers.
The average area covered per run is 9 acres.
• The precipitation rate Is In Inches per hour and is based on a sprinkler arc of 320 degrees_
The'System inlet Pressure' is the pressure required at the -traveler inlet. It includes allowances for the
traveler plumbing and drive, PE tube and sprinkler pressure. It does not include any pressure allowances
for field elevation or mainline pressure loss.
IMPORTANT! Turbine drives will have higher pressure losses at higher RPM
and are not recommended for travel speeds above 250 feet per hour.
For speeds above 250 Ft. per hour use an Engine Drive.
Follow the belt pulley selections below.
Lowest speed pulleys: Up to 75 feet per hour.
Medium speed pulleys: From 75 to 125 feet per hour.
Highest speed pulleys: From 125 to 250 feet per hour.
NOTE: Specifications are subject to change without notice.
Revised 04-16-97
39
Turbine
ii
L
Gearbox
Ira+l Sol-OW-0

-Specifications--
30A PERFORMANCE GUIDE
(02) 30A X 1000- WATER -REEL PERFORMANCE
Inches Depth of Application
320.
Nelson
Sprinldar
System
**Irrigated
Travel Speed - Feet Per Hour
Ct rs@
SR150
PeAormanse
Inlet
AREA
lMb
40
00
75
100 1
125
150
250
400
d MOZ:
PSI GPM DIA
PSI
Width X Length
1131°
.Sr
50
100
250
72
175 X low
1.2
1.0
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.27
Ring
60
110
M
65
186 X 1093
1.2
1.0
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.3
10.2
0.1
0.26
or .T
70
120
256
98
195 X 1098
1.3
1.0
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.26
Taper
SO
128
290
1 110
203 X 1102
1.3
1.1
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.2
9A
0.25
.9T
50
130
270
s0
189 X 1095
1.4
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.30
Ring
60
143
285
94
20O X 1100
1.5
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.29
or X
70
155
300
108
210 X 1105
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.29
Taper
80
165
310
122
217 X 11109
1.6
1.3
0.9
0.6
0.5
0A
0.3
0.2
0.29
1.W
60
192
300
108
210 X .1105
1.6
1.5
1.0
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.34
Ring
70
197
310
124
217 X 1109
1.4
1.5
1.0
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.34
or .r
80
210
320
139
224 X 1112
2.0
1.6
1.1
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.34
Taper
90
223
330
155
231 X 1116
2.0
1.6
1.1
0.8
0.7
0.5
5.3
0.2
0.34
1.Ir
50
205
300
107
210 X 1105
2.1
1.6
1.1
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.36
Ring
60
225
315
126
221 X 1110
2.1
1.7
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.38
or 1.T
70
245
330
145
231 X 1116
2.2
1.8
1.2
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.35
Taper
80
2fi0
340
163
230 X 1119
2.3
1.5
1.2
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.35
1.2r
50
255
32fl
131
224 X 1112
2.4
1.9
1.3
1.0
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.42
Ring
60
275
335
M
235 X 1117
2.5
2.0
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.l
0.4
0.2
0.41
or 1.1'
Tapes
Hours For 1000 Feet of Travel:
25.0
20.0
13.3
10.0
8.0
6.7
4.0
2.5
System inlet pressure shown abbWis for Turbine Drives. Engine Drives will be approx 10 PSI lower.
"Area covered may vary depending on wind conditions, field dimensions and use of unspecified sprinklers.
The average area covered per nun Is 5 acres.
' The precipitation rate is in Inches per hour and is based on a sprinkler arc of 320 degrees
The 'System Inlet Pressure' Is the pressure required at the traveler Inlet. It includes
allowances for the traveler plumbing and drive, PE tube and sprinkler pressure.
It does not Include any pressure allowances for field elevation or mainline
pressure loss.
Turbine
l
Gearbox
IMPORTANT! Turbine drives will have higher pressure tosses at higher RPM
and are not recommended for travel speeds above 250 feet per hour.
For speeds above 250 Ft. per hour use an Engine Drive.
Follow the belt pulley selections below.
Lowest speed pulleys: Up to 75 feet per hour.
Medium speed pulleys: From 75 to 126 feet per hour.
Highest speed pulleys: From 125 to 250 feet per hour.
NOTE: Specifications are subject to change without notice.
1D2I 597-0135-0
42

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARMATERS
and
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET SUMMARY
Landowner 1 Operator Name Billy Kilpatrick COUNTY Duplin
Adress PO Box94
Kenansville NC 28349 DATE 1/14102
Telephone [phone] Facility # 31-97
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications
Tract
Number
Hydrant
or
field (1)
Number
acres
start end
wetted
area
acres
middle
wetted
area
acres
stop end
wetted
area
Approximate
Maximun
Useable Size
of field (2)
(acres) Table
column
Length
of
pulls
in feet
Width
of
pulls
in feet
Soil Type.(°,6)
Slope
Crop(s)
Maximun
Application
Rate (3)
(inlhr)
Maxlumn
Application
per Irrigation
cycle (3)
(inches)
3829
1
0.64
4.79
0
5.43 EE90
13,C
858
243
AUB
0-5
corn,wheat,92XIbeans
0.6
1
3829
2
0.64
4.89
0
5.53 EE90
B,C
876
243
NOR
0-5
corn,wheat,soybeans
0.5
1
3829
3
0.64
4.99
0
5.63 EE90
B,C
887
245
NOR
0-5
com,wheat,soybeans
0.5
1
3829
4
0.64
4.09
0
4.73 EE90
B,C
727
245
AUB
0-5
com,wheat,soybeans
0.5
1
3829
5
0.47
2.9
0
3.37 EE90
B,C
610
207
AUB
0-5
corn,wheat,s ns
0.5
1
3829
6
0.47
3.39
0
3.86 EE90
B,C
671
220
AUB
0-5
com,wheal,soybeans
0.5
1
3829
7
0.46
2.58
0
3.04 E190
B,C
510
220
AUB
0-5
corn,wheat,soybeans
0.5
1
3829
8
0.47
1.63
0
2.1 EE90
8,C
322
220
AUB
0-5
corn,wheal,soybeans
0.5
1
3829
9
0.47
1.93
0
2.43 EE90
B,C
413
207
AUB
0-5
corn,wheats ns
0.5
1
1 see attached map.
2 Total field acreage minus required buffer areas,
3 Refer to N,C. Irrigation guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section II G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used.
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Date

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARMATERS
and
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET SUMMARY
Landowner/ Operator Name Billy Kilpatrick COUNTY Duplin
Adress PO Box94
Kenansville NC 28349 DATE 1114/02
Telephone [phone] Facility # 31-97
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications
Tract
Number
Hydrant
or
field (1)
Number
acres
start end
wetted
area
acres
middle
wetted
I area
acres
stop end
wetted
area
Approximate
Maximun
Useable Size
of field (2)
(acres) Table
column
Length
of
pulls
In feet
Width
of
pulls
In feet
Soil T
Slope
(%)
Cro (s)
Maximun
Application
Rate (3)
(In/hr)
Maxlumn
Application
per Irrigation
cycle (3)
(Inches)
3186
10
0.64
6.29
0
6.93 EE=90
B,C
1066
257
AUB
0-5
corn,wheat,soybeans
0.5
1
3188
11
0.63
6.01
0
6.64 E190
B,C
1092
240
AUB
0-5
corn,wheat,soybeans
0.5
1
3186
12
0.63
6.89
0
7.52 E190
B,C
1250
240
AUB
0-5
com,wheat,soybeans
0.5
1
3186
13
0.63
6.89
0
7.52 E190
B,C
1250
240
AUB
0-5
corn,whest,s beans
0.5
1
.3186
14
0.63
3.31
0
3.94 E190
B,C
600
240
AUB
0-5
corn,wheat,soybeans
0.5
1
3186
15
0.64
2.58
0
3.22 EE90
B,C
438
257
AUB
0.5
corn,wheat,soybians
0.5
1
3186
16
0.61
6.17
0
6.78 EE75
B,C
1250
215
AUB
0-5
com,wheat,soybeens
0.5
1
3186
17
0.56
5.74
0
6.3 E175
B,C
1250
200
AUB
0-5
corn,wheat,soybeans
0.5
1
3186
18
0.56
5.74
0
6.3 E175
B,C
1250
200
AUB
0-5
corn,wheat,s eans
0.5'.
1
3186
19
0.61
6.17
0
6.78 EE75
B,C 1
1250
215
AUB
0-5 tcorn,wheat,sopeans
0.5
1
1 see attached map.
2 Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
3 Refer to N.C. Irrigation guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section II G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used.
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: lJohnny Lanier Date 1.-14.-02.

y
Sfate-of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources RECEIVED
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor DEC $ 1998
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.,
December 7, 1998
Billy Kilpatrick
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
463 Routledge St.
KenansvilIe NC 28349
I ffl?,
T 0
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310097
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin County
Dear Billy Kilpatrick:
In accordance with your application received on September 17, 1997, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Billy Kilpatrick, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal. waste from the Billy Kilpatrick Farm, located in Duplin County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 4320 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This *COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application mustibe
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS310097
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Page 2_
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County Health Department
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File -Central Files
Permit File-NDPU

State of North Carolina
Department of Envi;l:anment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the
Division. Please review the information for completeness and make any corrections
which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed. by the Division, please.
complete as best as possible. Do not leave any. question unanswered.
Application Date:
I. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signingf� initials�j1` space provided next to each
item. Diffi�
�jptr A121licants Initials
1. One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
2. Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed;
3. Two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does
not have a CAWMP, one must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Farm's name: Billy Kilpatrick Farr
2. Print Land Owner's name: Billy at
3. Land Owners Mailing address: PO Bqx 94_ _
City: Kenansville NC Zip: 28349
Telephone Number: 910-296-0619
4. County where farm is located:
5. Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include 5R numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Fr_om_Hwy. I LS-tokes-Gooding Rd. 3Miles on right,
6. Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
7. Lessee's / Integrators name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Carroll's Foods Inc
31 - 97
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97
Page 1 of 3

III. OPERATION INFORMATION:
1. Faun No.: 31-97
2. Operation Description: SwineoReration
Feeder to Finish _-
4320 - Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? Ezf yes; Q no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
Tvne of Swine No. of Animals Tvoe of Poultry EQ. of Animals type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
3. Acreage cleared and available for application: -29 Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP): 80
4. Number of Lagoons: I ; Total Capacity: 1113081 Cubic Feet (ft3)
Number of Storage Ponds: 10 ; Total Capacity: Cubic Feet ft3)
5. Is animal waste being applied on any field which has subsurface drains? QLES)or NO (please circle one)
6. Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity of or under the lagoon? YES or NO (please circle one)
IV. APPLICANT'Sf//��C��E,,RTIFICATION:
(Land Owner's name listed in question 11.2), attest that
this application for Y (Farm name listed in question Il.1)
x has been reviewed by me and is accdWate and Ymplete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application, are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature
V . MANAGER',S,CER
Date _T2
CATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, � (Manager's name listed in question H.6), attest that this
application for " U (Farm name listed in question 1I.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accura and compl to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature f%�Yj� __... _ Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone] ,
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97
Page 2 of 3

RECEIVED
WATER QUALITY SECTION
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE PLAN
nl 0 5 1998
Proper lagoon liquid management should be a year-round priority. It is especia
important to manage 1eveIs so that you do not have problems during extended��ai�ny and
�,e�l�ng
wet periods.
Maximum storage capacity should be available in the lagoon for periods when the
receiving crop is dormant (such as wintertime for bermudagrass) or when there are
extended rainy spells such as the thunderstorm season in the summertime. This means
that at the first signs of plant growth in the later winter/early spring, irrigation according to
a farm waste management plan should be done whenever the land is dry enough to
receive lagoon liquid. This will make storage space available in the lagoon for future wet
periods. In the late summer/early fall the lagoon should be pumped down to the low
marker (see Figure 2-1) to allow for winter storage. Every effort should be made to
maintain the lagoon close to the minimum liquid level as long as the weather and waste
utilization plan will allow it.
Waiting until the lagoon has reached its maximum storage capacity before starting to
irrigate does not leave room for storing excess water during extended wet periods.
Overflow from the lagoon for any reason except a 25-year, 24-hour storm is a violation of
state law and subject to penalty action. `
The routine maintenance of a lagoon involves the following:
Maintenance of a vegetative cover for the dam.
Fescue or common bermudagrass are the most common vegetative
covers. The vegetation should be fertilized each year, if needed, to
maintain a vigorous stand. The amount of fertilizer applied should be
based on a soils test, but in the event that it is not practical to obtain
a soils test each year, the lagoon embankment and surrounding areas
should be fertilized with 800 pounds per acre of 10-10-10, or
equivalent.
Brush and trees on the embankment must be controlled. This may be
done by mowing, spraying, grazing, chopping, or a combination of
___these practices. This should be done at least once a year and
possibly twice in years that weather conditions are favorable for
heavy vegetative growth.
NOTE: If vegetation is controlled by spraying, the herbicide must not be allowed to enter
the Iagoon water. Such chemicals could harm the bacteria in the lagoon that are treating
the waste.
Maintenance inspections of the entire lagoon should be made during the initial filling of
the lagoon and at least monthly and after major rainfall and storm events. Items to be
checked should include, as a minimum, the following:
Waste Inlet Pipes, Recycling Pipes, and Overflow Pipes ---look for:
l . separation of joints
2. cracks or breaks
3. accumulation of salts or minerals
4. overall condition of pipes

Lagoon surface ---look for:
l . undesirable vegetative growth
2. floating or lodged debris
Embankment ---look for:
I . settlement, cracking, or "jug" holes
2. side slope stability ---slumps or bulges
3. wet or damp areas on the back slope
4. erosion due to lack of vegetation or as a result of wave action
5. rodent damage
Larger lagoons may be subject to liner damage due to wave action caused by strong
winds. These waves can erode the lagoon sidewalls, thereby weakening the lagoon dam.
A good stand of vegetation will reduce the potential damage caused by wave action. If
wave action causes serious damage to a lagoon sidewall, baffles in the lagoon may be
used to reduce the wave impacts.
Any of these features could lead to erosion and weakening of the dam. If your lagoon has
any of these features, you should call an appropriate expert familiar with design and
construction of waste lagoons. You may need to provide a temporary fix if there is a threat
of a waste discharge. However, a permanent solution should be reviewed by the
technical expert. Any digging into a lagoon dam with heavy equipment is a serious
undertaking with potentially serious consequences and should not be conducted unless
recommended by an appropriate technical expert.
Transfer Pumps ---check for proper operation_ of-
1 . recycling pumps
2. irrigation pumps
Check for leaks, loose fittings, and overall pump operation. An unusually loud or grinding
noise, or a large amount of vibration, may indicate that the pump is in need or repair or
replacement.
NOTE: Pumping systems should be inspected and operated frequently enough so that you
are not completely "surprised" by equipment failure. You should perform your pumping
system maintenance at a time when your lagoon is at its low level. This will allow some
safety time should major repairs be required. Having a nearly full lagoon is not the time
to think about switching, repairing , or borrowing pumps. Probably, if your lagoon is full,
your neighbor's lagoon is full also. You should consider maintaining an inventory of spare
parts or pumps.
Surface water diversion features are designed to carry all surface
drainage waters (such as rainfall runoff, roof drainage, gutter outlets,
and parking lot runoff) away from your lagoon and other waste
treatment or storage structures. The only water that should be
coming from your lagoon is that which comes from your flushing
(washing) system pipes and the rainfall that hits the lagoon directly.
You should inspect your diversion system for the following:
l . adequate vegetation
2. diversion capacity
3. ridge berm height

Identified problems should be corrected promptly. It is advisable to inspect your system
during or immediately following a heavy rain. If technical assistance is needed to
determine proper solutions, consult with appropriate experts.
You should record the level of the lagoon just prior to when rain is predicted, and then
record the level again 4 to 6 hours after the rain (assumes there is no pumping). This will
give you an idea of how much your lagoon level will rise with a certain rainfall amount
(you must also be recording your rainfall for this to work). Knowing this should help in
planning irrigation applications and storage. If your lagoon rises excessively, you may
have an inflow problem from a surface water diversion or there may be seepage into the
lagoon from the surrounding land.
Lagoon Operation
Startup:
Immediately after construction establish a complete sod cover on bare soil
surfaces to avoid erosion.
2. Fill new lagoon design treatment volume at least half full of water before
waste loading begins, taking care not to erode lining or bank slopes.
3. Drainpipes into the lagoon should have a flexible pipe extender on the
end of the pipe to discharge near the bottom of the lagoon during initial
filling or another means of slowing the incoming water to avoid erosion of
the lining.
4. When possible, begin loading new lagoons in the spring to maximize
bacterial establishment (due to warmer weather).
5. It is recommended that a new lagoon be seeded with sludge from a healthy
working swine lagoon in the amount of 0.25 percent of the full lagoon
Iiquid volume. This seeding should occour at least two weeks prior to the
addition of wastewater.
6. Maintain a periodic check on the -lagoon liquid pH. If the pH falls below
7.0, add agricultural lime at the rate of 1 pound per 1000 cubic feet of
lagoon liquid volume until the pH rises above 7.0. Optimum lagoon liquid
pH is between 7.5 and 8.0.
7. A dark color, lack of bubbling, and excessive odor signals inadequate
biological activity. Consultation with a technical specialist is recommended
if these conditions occur for prolonged periods, especially during the warm
season.
Loading:
The more frequently and regularly that wastewater is added to a lagoon, the better the
lagoon will function. Flush systems that wash waste into the lagoon several times daily are
optimum for treatment. Pit recharge systems, in which one or more buildings are drained
and -recharged each day, also work well.

Practice water conservation ---minimize building water usage and
spillage from leaking waterers, broken pipes and washdown through
proper maintenance and water conservation.
Minimize feed wastage and spillage by keeping feeders adjusted. This
will reduce the amount of solids entering the lagoon
Management:
Maintain lagoon liquid Ievel between the permanent storage level and
the full temporary storage level.
Place visible markers or stakes on the lagoon bank to show the
minimum liquid level and the maximum liquid lever (Figure 2-1). .
Start irrigating at the earliest possible date in the spring based on
nutrient requirements and soil moisture so that temporary storage
will be maximized for the summer thunderstorm season. Similarly,
irrigate in the late summer/early fall to provide maximum lagoon
storage for the winter.
The lagoon liquid level should never be closer than 1 foot to the lowest
point of the dam or embankment.
Do not pump the lagoon liquid level lower that the permanent storage
level unless you are removing sludge.
Locate float pump intakes approximately 18 inches underneath the liquid
surface and as far away from the drainpipe inlets as possible.
Prevent additions of bedding materials, long-stemmed forage or vegetation,
molded feed, plastic syringes, or other foreign materials into the lagoon.
Frequently remove solids from catch basins at end of confinement houses or
wherever they are installed.
Maintain strict vegetation, rodent, and varmint control near lagoon edges.
Do not allow trees or large bushes to grow on lagoon dam or embankment.
Remove sludge from the lagoon either when the sludge storage capacity is
full or before it fills 50 percent of the permanent storage volume.
If animal production is to be terminated, the owner is responsible for
obtaining and implementing a closure plan to eliminate the possibility of a
pollutant discharge.
Sludge Removal:
Rate of lagoon sludge buildup can be reduced by:

proper lagoon sizing,
mechanical solids separation of flushed waste,
gravity settling of flushed waste solids in an appropriately designed basin, or
minimizing feed wastage and spillage.
Lagoon sludge that is removed annually rather than stored long term will:
have more nutrients,
have more odor, and
require more land to properly use the nutrients.
Removal techniques:
Hire a custom applicator.
Mix the sludge and lagoon liquid with a chopper -agitator impeller
pump through large -bore sprinkler irrigation system onto nearby cropland;
and soil incorporate.
Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland or
forageland; mix remaining sludge; pump into liquid sludge applicator; haul
and spread onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.
Dewater the. upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland or
forageland; dredge sludge from lagoon with dragline or sludge barge; berm
an area beside lagoon to receive the sludge so that liquids can drain back
into lagoon; allow sludge to dewater; haul and spread with manure spreader
onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.
Regardless of the method, you must have the sludge material analyzed for waste
constituents just as you would your lagoon water. The sludge will contain different
nutrient and metal values from the liquid. The application of the sludge to fields will be
limited by these nutrients as well as any previous waste applications to that field and crop
requirement. Waste application rates will be discussed in detail in Chapter 3.
When removing sludge, you must also pay attention to the liner to prevent damage. Close
attention by the pumper or drag -line operator will ensure that the lagoon liner remains
intact. If you see soil material or the synthetic liner material being disturbed, you should
stop the activity immediately and not resume until you are sure that the sludge can be
removed without liner injury. If the liner is damaged it must be repaired as soon as
possible.
Sludge removed from the lagoon has a much higher phosphorus and heavy metal content
than liquid. Because of this it should probably be applied to land with low phosphorus
and metal levels, as indicated by a soil test, and -incorporated to reduce the chance of
erosion. Note that if the sludge is applied to fields with very high soil -test phosphores, it
should be applied only at rates equal to the crop removal of phosphorus. As with other
wastes, always have your lagoon sludge analyzed for its nutrient value.
The application of sludge will increase the amount of odor at the waste application site.
Extra precaution should be used to observe the wind direction and other conditions which
could increase the concern of neighbors.

Possible Causes of Lagoon Failure
Lagoon failures result in the unplanned discharge of wastewater from the structure. Types
of failures include leakage through the bottom or sides, overtopping, and breach of the
dam. Assuming proper design and construction, the owner has the responsibility for
ensuring structure safety. Items which may lead to lagoon failures include:
Modification of the lagoon structure ---an example is the placement of a pipe
in the dam without proper design and construction. (Consult an expert in
lagoon design before placing any pipes in dams.)
Lagoon liquid levels ---high levels are a safety risk.
Failure to inspect and maintain the dam.
Excess surface water flowing into the Iagoon.
Liner integrity ---protect from inlet pipe scouring, damage during sludge
removal, or rupture from lowering lagoon liquid level below groundwater
table. .
NOTE: If lagoon water is allowed to overtop the dam, the moving water will soon cause
gullies to form in the dam. Once this damage starts, it can quickly cause a large discharge
of wastewater and possible darn failure.

System Calibration
Information presented in manufacturer's charts are based on average operation
conditions with relatively new equipment. Discharge rates and application rates
change over time as equipment gets older and components wear. In particular,
pump wear tends to reduce operating pressure and flow. With continued use,
nozzle wear results in an increase in the nozzle opening which will increase the
discharge rate while decreasing the wetted diameter.
You should be aware that operating the system differently than assumed in the
design will alter the application rate, diameter of coverage, and subsequently the
application uniformity. For example, operating the system with excessive pressure
results in smaller droplets, greater potential for drift, and accelerates wear of the
sprinkler nozzle. Clogging of nozzles can result in pressure increase. Plugged
intakes or crystallization of mainlines will reduce operating pressure. Operating
below design pressure greatly reduces the coverage diameter and application
uniformity.
For the above reason, you should calibrate your equipment on a regular basis to
ensure proper application rates and uniformity. Calibration at least once every
three years is recommended. Calibration involves collecting and measuring flow at
several locations in the application area. Any number of containers can be used to
collect flow and determine the application rate. Rain gauges work best because
they already have a graduated scale from which to read theapplication amount
without having to perform additional calculations: However, pans, plastic buckets,
jars, or anything with a uniform opening and cross-section can be used provided
the liquid collected can be easily transferred to a scaled container for measuring.
For stationary sprinklers, collection containers should be located randomly
throughout the application area at several distances from sprinklers. For traveling
guns,:spr+nklers should be located along a transect perpendicular to the direction
of pull. -Set out collection containers 25 feet apart along the transect on both,
sides of -the gun cart. You should compute the average application rate for all
non_uniformity of the application. On a windless day, variation between containers
of more -than 30 percent is cause for concern. You should contact your irrigation
dealer or technical specialist for assistance.
'Reprinted for Certification Training for Operations of Animal Waste Management Systems Manual

MORTALITY MANAGEMENT METHODS
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
{ } ; Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours
after knowledge of the death. The burial be at least 300 feet from
any flowing steam "or public body of water.
{ Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G. S. 106-168.7
( } Complete incineration
'In the case of dead poultry only, placing in. a ,disposal pit -of a size and
design approved by the Department of -Agriculture.
( ) Any method which in the professional opinion of the State
Veterinarian would make possible the salvage of part of a dead
animal's value without endangering human or animal health.- (Written
approval of the, State Veterinarian must be attached)

INSECT CONTROL CHECKLIST FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS
Source
Cause
BMP's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
(Liquid Systems)
Flush Gutters
Accumulation of solids
lush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated
so s from gutters as designed.
emove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and Pits
Crusted Solids
( ) Maintain lagoons, settling basins and
pits where pest breeding is apparent to
minimize the crusting of solids to a depth
of no more than 6-8 inches over more than
`
2% of surface.
Excessive Vegetative
Decaying vegetation
kLAaintain vegetative control along banks of
Growth
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along waters edge on impoundment's perimeter.
(Dry Systems)
Feeders Feed Spillage f) Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the accumulation
of decaying wastage.
(1 Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g. 7-10 day
interval during summer; 15-30 day interval during winter).
Feed Storage Accumulations of feed residues () Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
insuring drainage away from site andlor providing
adequate containment (e.g.. covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products).
I i Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed.
Animal Holding Areas Accumulations of animal wastes
and feed wastage
AMIC--November 11, 1996
( ) Eliminate low area that trap moisture along fences
and other locations where waste accumulates and
and disturbance by animals is minimal.
{ ) Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e. inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids as needed).

Dry Manure Handling Accumulations of animal wastes f 1 Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g. 7-10 day
Systems interval during summer; 15-30 days interval during
winter) where manure is loaded for land application
or disposal.
(} provide for adequate drainage around manure stockpiles.
f } Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated wastes
in filter stripes around stockpiles and manure handling
areas as needed.
The issues checked ( ) pertain to this operation. The landowner/integrator agrees to use sound judgment in applying
insect control measures as practical.
certify the aforementioned insect control Best Management Practices have been reviewed with me.
(Landowner Signature)
(Farm Name)
(Facility Number)
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
27695-7613.
AMIC--November 11, 1996

t
SWINE FARM WASTE MANAGEMENT ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST
Source Cause BNIP's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead Swine production Ve tative or wooded buffers;
mmended best management
pre ices;
{ od judgment and common sense
Animal body surfaces
Dirty manure -covered animals
i 1 Dry Poors
Floor surfaces
Wet manure -covered floors
ed floors;
terers located over slotted floors;
5rs
edat high end of solid floors;
{ } Scrape manure buildup from floors;
{) U 4rfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits
Urine
i equent manure removal by flush,pit
recharge,or scrape
Parital micorbial decomposition
() Und rfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fans
Volatile gases;
f) Fa maintenance;
Dust
{ fi ant air movement
Indoor surfaces
Dust
ashdown between groups of animals
i l Feed additives;
() Feeder covers;
() Feed delivery downspout extenders to
feeder covers
Flush tanks
Agitation of recycled lagoon
(I Flush tank covers
liquid whites tanks are filling
{) Extend fill lines to near bottom of
tanks with anti -siphon vents
Flush alleys
Agitation during wastewater
{ ) Underfloor flush with underfloor
conveyanance
ventilation
Pit recharge points
Agitation of recycled lagoon
() Extend rechard lines to near bottom of
liquid while pits are filling
pits with anti -siphon vents
Lift stations
Agitation during sump tank filling
U Sump tank covers
and drawdown
Outside drain collection
Agitation during wastewater
{ } Box covers
or junction boxes
conveyance
End of drainpipes at lagoon
Agitation during wastewater
{) Extend discharge point of pipes
underneath lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces
Volatile gas emissions
oper lagoon liquid capacity
Biological mixing
t4orrect lagoon startup procedures
Agitation
inimum surface area -to -volume ratio
{ inimum agitation when pumping
f l Mechanical aeration
{) Proven biological additives
i
Irrigation sprinkler nozzles High pressure agitation WWrri ate on dry days with little or no wind
Wind draft { irrmum recommended operation pressure
( rnp, intake near lagoon liquid surface
( ) Pump from second -stage lagoon
AMOC--November 11, 1996

.. 1. b
Storage tank or basin
Partial microbial decomposition
{ 1 Bottom or midlevel loading
surface
Mixing while filling
{ j Tank covers
Agitation when emptying
[ } Basin surface mats of solids
[ } Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface
Partial micobial decomposition
[ } Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
Mixing while filling
level
Agitation when emptying
f 1 Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge
Agitation when spreading
{ j Soil injection of slurry/sludges
spreader outlets
Volatile gas emissions
{ } Wash residual manure from spreader after use
[ } Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure, slurry
Volatile gas emissions while drying
[) Soil infection of slurry/sludges
or sludge on field surfaces
() Soil incorporation within 48 hours
f 1 Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
{ j Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals
Carcass decomposition
[ } Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead animal disposal
Carcass decomposition
[) Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits
pits
[) Proper location/construction of disposal pits
Incinerators
Incomplete combustion
f I Secondary stack burners
Standing water around
Improper drainage
I 1 Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities
Microbial decomposition of
away from facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto public
Poorly maintained access roads
[ i Farm access road maintenance
roads from farm access
Additional Information:
Available From:
Swine Manure Management; 0200 Rule/BMP Packet
NCSU-County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies, EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU-BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge --Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 128-88
NCSU-BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Fluse--Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129-88
NCSU-BAE
Lagoon Desig and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
NCSU-BA£
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU-BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33
NCSU-Swine Extension
Environmental Assuranc Program: NPPC Manual
NC Pork Produces Assoc
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force
NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PR0107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Florida Cooperative Extension
The issues checked Jpertain to this o eration. The landowner/inte rator a rees to use sound 'ud ment in applying
P 9 9 judgment
odor control measures as practical.
I certify the aforementioned odor control Best Managment Practices have been reviewed with me.
(Landowner Signature)
AMOC--November 11, 1996

r - .15'4'y1i.1X0,h'
c y by rF 1
3'1vj
1
4.
S3 f�• ��i1 k1) �.Y
,e
tip iIr y +i
ib
da
Z.I � CYf ijs q s•a � � 4
'IA .t
i � Lrl t'1 to }� � r T --II t• tP ?�
Al
�Lc.o
Vy i •: 1' C' y
f .yy� � ` _ titi €:v.L ,., fir: 9 .�' � •� s a
L' 2y
`i 1.0
sr '=1 .`i's P� � n i e hPaa ,9A ��` ✓'«•
PI
ock

__ it' ,t ;.� Y.f' �-.• ..-.a'r . € �s •t �i�' � � yF. '+ ti4� � �?. � �r'Tr' s t �� � � - � 1 i
.�, y,�.� i ^"_°��:�w��.�-.F�R.'ti t, K� .r(l-s � f._ ��,�� � _,�fi Mh Yee •4d- '�'�a...�t'. i .—�':'�7°�.

Ani`r, Waste Management Plan Celt, cation
` (Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
Company Name Carrolls
stop or New or Expanded {Please Cl one)
General Information:
Name of Farm: Billy Kilpatrick Farms Facility No: 31-97
Owner(s) Name: William "Billy" Kilpatrick Phone No: 910-296-0619
Mailing Address: PO Box W Kenansville, NC 28349
Farm Location: Fourteen Digit Hydrologic Unit: 03030007030010
Latitude and Longitude: 34- 59' 05" / 77- 57' 20" County: Duplin
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific:
road names, directions, milepost, etc.): On SR 1378 approximately 1/2 mile from intersection
with SR 1379.
Operation Description:
Type of Swine
No of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder
0
{) Feeder to Finish
4320
0 Farrow to Wean
0
0 Farrow to Feeder
0
0 Farrow to Finish
0
Type of Poultry
()Layer
()Pullets
Other Type of Livestock:
No of Animals Type of Cattle No of Animals
()Dairy
()Beef
Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application: 90 Required Acreage: 80
Number of Lagoons/Storage Ponds: 1 Total Capacity: 1,113,081 Cubic Feet (ft3 )
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YE, or NO (please circle one)
Owner/Manager Agreement
I(we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and maintenance
procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the faun named above and will implement these procedures. 1 (we)
know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a
new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal
waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical standards developed by
the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District. 1 (we) know that modification must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation
District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved plan is
changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owner: William Robert "Billy" Kilpatrick
Signature: j,,Z Date: / _ �/- 96 _
Name of Manager (if different from a er):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- April 24, 1996 1

�'echnical Specialist Certify— ion
1. A- " "—mical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM) as
specified in 15A NCAC 214.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the North Carolina
Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following
elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may sign each
certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC,I) the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically competent.
II. Certification of Design
A) Collection Storage, Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
90 Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization requirements.
{ } New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds, have
been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print) Michael E. Sugg
Affiliation: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address (Agency): P.O. Box 277 Kenansville, NC 28349-0277 Phone No: 910-296-2121
Signature: , �' XW Date: / Z 1996
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separation (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (PIease Print): Michael E. Sugg
Affiliation: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address (Agency): P.O. Box 277 Kenansville NC 28349-0277 Phone No: 910-296-2121
Signature: S' Date: % 7,1�1 1996
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
O Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from Iounging and heavy use areas have been designed in accordance
with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Michael E. Sugg
Affiliation: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address (Agency): P.O. Box 277 Kenansville, NC 28349-0277 Phone No.: 910-296-2121
Signature: . 1. Date:. ( 7-0 / �A--
AWC — ApriI 24, 19Aal 2

D) Application and Nandlin� Eu men
Che- k the Appropriate box
AA Existing existing waste with existinwaste application equipment (WUP or I)
IrvAnimal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in accordance
with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste management
plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the
specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of application has been established; required buffers
can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the plan).
O New or expanded facilit • or existing facility without existing waste aRplication Nuipment (1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at
rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications has
been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Michael E. Sugg
Affiliation: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address(Agency): PO Box 277 Kenansville NC 28349-0277 Phone No: 910-296-2121
Signature:' Date: ��1 1996
Ou
III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed in
accordance with the approved plan to meat or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
AWC -- Aprii 24, 1996

B) Land Application Site (W"UP)
Check the appropriate box
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
() Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system as
specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to established the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is appropriate for
compliance with the waste utilization plan.
(} Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared Iand within 30 days of
this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Michael E. Sugg
Affiliation: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address(Agency): P.O. Box 277 Kenansville, NC 28349-0277 Phone No.: 910-296-2121
Signature: Date: 7 1996
f
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in IIT.B above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I(we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan, and if
appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion from a
Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that
failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action
from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manger (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Tots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified in
the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
AWC — April 24, 1996

D) Application and hlandlinL, Eg nent Installation (WUP or 1)
Check i'he appropriate block
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use; calibration and
/ 1 adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
() Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner has
proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the contract
agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained, calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
{) Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has been purchased
and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate storage to
hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with cropping
system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are
contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): Michael E. Sugg
Affiliation: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address(Agency): PO Box 277 Kenansville NC 28349-0277 Phone No.: 910-296-2121
Signature: �' Date: J 44 1996
The following signature block is only to used when the box for conditional approval in III D above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as specified in my
(our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation from a Technical Specialist
within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this
verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Management at the following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. BOX 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste Management Plan to the
local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in your tiles with your Animal Waste Management
Plan.
AWC — April 24, 1996 5

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
March. 15, 1996
PRODUCER: BILLY KILPATRICK
LOCATION: PO BOX 723
KENANSVILLE NC 28349
TELEPHONE: [phone]
TYPE OPERATION: Feeder to Finish Swine
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 4320 hogs design capacity
PAGE 1
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant
nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can
utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infilitration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre-
cautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per
acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM
regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of the nutrients
for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this
is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you
choose to inject the waste in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating waste are
not 'the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage require-
ments should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste
management facility. Attached you will find information on proper
sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to
the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 2
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
4320 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 8208 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
4320 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 9936 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.

ram`
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 3
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
APPLIC.'
TIME
479.375
3186
4
AUB
C
75
73.75
20
6.5
MAR-JUN
3186 1-4 JAUB JW 145 190 1 16*5 1585
FEB-MAR
3186 6 JAUB IC 175 173.75 120 136 12655
MAR-JUN
3186 1-6 JAUB JW 145 190 1 136 13240
FEB-MAR
3186 10 AUB I C 175 173.75 120 12.�7 1199.125
MAR-JUN
3186 -10 JAUB JW 145 190 12.7 1243
FEB-MAR
3186 5 JAUB DSB 118 172 1 16.6 1475.2
JUN-SEPT
3186 7 NOB DSB 138 1152 1 16.6 11003.2
JUN-SEPT
3186 8 JAUB DSB 118 172 1 117.5 11260
JUN-SEPT
3186 9 JAUB DSB 118 1.72 1 113.8 1993.6
JUN-SEPT
TOTAL 11133.5
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal zone
Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of NC to
have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses Nitrogen.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 4
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate
land. See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
APPLIC.
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
LBS N
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
DSB
DOUBLE CROPPED SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
4
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 5
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
TABLE 1 1 89.7 1 11133.5
TABLE 2 I 0
TOTAL JI 89.7
AMOUNT
*** BALANCE
1 11133.5
9936
-1197.5
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, pnd perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE. The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic
land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be
nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production
facility will produce approximately 1598.4 pounds of plant
available nitrogen (PAN)'per year in the sludge that will need to be
removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when broadcasting
the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well
special equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of
the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs.
This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure,
soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the
soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen
applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
Your facility is designed for 210 days of temporary storage
and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
7 months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure be within 1.7 feet of the top of the dike.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 6
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you
receive
the
waste
analysis report
for assistance in determining the amount
of waste per
acre
and the proper
application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVES OF OPERATION : ke- Z 4 i gas
Co►� r�-
ou)
4" 1e 1
1S (l0� SC C.amme('craL `�
L[i' ThL7
L3
+N
7T
`� e. S,)-f
ern 1` Sc
k"
S ''
I i - (L P j � l e- h <jkjsP )• W t d Sd ..PP .,-- n r su-&4 Ike l,/ w6,f
vm�+- 1r\C l� mac' C&.k'� J 'V i` E r r11e `N"C,}
4PP P6f- Cw-,V-<`e L 33. 04 Aov,:�
C'br-e) It"s
4 tA& S 1)

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 7
Plans and Specifications
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division
of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that
the producer either has owns or has long term access to adequate
land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer does not own
adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS
with a copy of a written agreement with a landowner who is within
a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility
to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is
a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource
Management System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System
(ACS). If an ACS,is used the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips
will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter
strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM.
(See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390
Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when the
wind is blowing.
5. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally
tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops
or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in
the NRCS Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or
to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur
in order to control conditions conducive to odor or flies
and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in
such a manner that no more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf
area is covered.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 8
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils
should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover
crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a
crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to
surface water. This distance may be reduced for waters that
are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter strips
are present. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than -those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other
property and public right -of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface wasters,
drainageways, or wetlands by discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site
by a "technical specialist". Animal waste should not be
applied on grassed waterways that discharge into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the
application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into
the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures
must maintain a maximum operating level to provide adequate
storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in addition to
one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments,
berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation
shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to
areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be
kept mowed and.accessible. Lagoon berms and structures
should be -inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage
or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and imple-
menting a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept
on site.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 9
NAME OF FARM:
OWNER / MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the ap-
proved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities
will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental•Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I
(we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste
from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event
less severe than the 25 year, 24 hour storm. The approved plan will
be filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of the local
Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for review
by DEM upon request.
I (we) understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also cer-
tify that the waste will be applied on the land according to this
plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: BILLY KILPATRICK
SIGNATURE: %{,Q, /,{,r1L„�J s„(,z{;,, DATE:
5--1- 7 C
NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner):
please print
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: Michael E. Sugg
AFFILIATION: USDA Natural Resources Conservation service
ADDRESS (AGENCY): P. O. Box 277
Kenansville NC 28349
SIGNATURE: J DATE: �7 6

Fig-•�; United States soil P. O. Box 277
Department of Conservation I[T�,
�E;Itansville, NC 28349
Agriculture Service Telephone [phone]
WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY SITE EVALUATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
NAME Mr, raj t q C�,• 1_. r+r it,k.
P.O. 60-t w
Ke.ta,,,s, J I T(. 'U_3 4a
LOCATION
�or�k a Ke�n�•s.. ►�1 �
TELEPHONE q 1G,7A — b 6 f 9 %�& �, SIZE OF OPERATION i9 G1s
T l L11 AA _ ! A _ +► e
LOCATION DATA
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER
NUMBER OF HOUSES WITHIN 2000 FEET OF SITE
IS SITE WITHIN 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? YES NO ✓
IS SITE AT LEAST 100 FEET FROM A "BLUE LINE" PERENNIAL STREAM? YES ✓ NO
IS SITE WITHIN 1 MILE ZONING JURISDICTION OF A MUNICIPALITY? YES NO ✓
if yes, landowner should consult with local zoning board about required permits �—
WETLAN``DS -
WILL SITE INVOLVE CLEARING WOODLAND OR ANY NON CROPLAND ? YES INTO ✓
IF YES, HAS PRODUCER COMPLETED AN AD-1026 FORM? YES NO
DOES NON WETLAND NEED TO BE MEASURED BY REGISTERED SURVEYOR PRIOR TO
APPROVING WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN YES NO ✓
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PRODUCER TO CONTACT THE US
ARMY CORP-OF ENGINEERS AND THE NC DIVISION'OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TO
DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL PERMITS ARE REQUIRED. NO WETLANDS SHOULD BE ALTERED UNTIL
PRODUCER RECEIVES WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM SCS, US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND NC
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
IVASTE NIANAGEMENT -- VALID ONLY IF WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN ATTACHED
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY LAND APPLY WASTE? YES ✓ NO
IF NO, DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE LAND? YES NO
SEE ATTACHED PLAN FOR SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS
SOIL INVESTIGATION -- VALID ONLY IF SOIL INVESTIGATION -SHEET ATTACHED
IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR LAGOON?
IS A CLAY LINER REQUIRED?
IF YES, IS CLAY AVAILABLE ONSTTE?
IS A CORE TRENCH REQUIRED?
YES ✓
NO
YES
NO ✓
YES
NO QUESTIONABLE
YES—,�'
NO
SITE APPROVED YES ✓ NO:- CONDITIONAL
COMMENTS rc v -f
0

US Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
NC -CPA 16
4-92
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Land User/Owner (ji 11N, k iCounty 0"v); ,
I pp
Location/Tract & Field Number a� �-,8 Acreage_. 131-1
Prepared by
Brief Description of Planned Practice/RMS/Project Measure:
Environmental Factors and Resources to Identify and Evaluate I/
1. Is wetland included in the planning area: (References: NCPM;
190-GM 410..26; Hydric soils list; Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater_Kabitats_of the U.S._; National Wetlands Inventory Maps;.
NFSAM.
✓ No
Yes - if yes,
-- identify types present
-- Attach environmental evaluation showing what effect
__planned assistance will have on wetland and how this
assistance is within policy
--- Have needed permits (CAMA, DEM, Corps, etc.) been
obtained by the landuser?
-- Make sure no planned practices will put the landowner in
violation of Swampbuster
2:- Endangered— and/or -threatened species: (Re ferences:--.--19.0.--GM'h:r;._._�;.__,�,._.,.�..:
410.22; Technical Guide -Section I-i(13) and Section I-vii
No Yes
-- Identify species"whose range and habitat needs indicate
.they might.occur in planning -area
-- Identify on map any designated- critical habitat

I
3:. Is a designated- natural or scenic area included in.
the planning
area.- or will planned actions impact. *on an, adjacent- natural. or
scenic area? (References: 190-GM,410.23 and ..24)
✓- No
Yes- If yes., encourage landuser to, consult with concerned
agencies.,, societies,, and- indi.viduals.- to, arrive. at
mutuallym satisfactory land. useand, treatment:., -
4. Does -the- -plannlng, &r�ea, jnc-llude: the- plal-n>­
(Ref erences-_­ MCPMi19;Q,-GM;410-.25J#-,- HTJD-. Flood Plain, maps):
No
Yes: ­ If. yes:,,
Is-. the, as.slst-.ed.- actdon.. likely..- to.. have: significant
adverse• effects: on; existing: natural and: beneficial.
v.a-lues: in; -the, fIckpd-, pla�in?.,
Is. there, a. practical, alternative: outside. the flood�.
plain-
-- Has: the- flq.od,,. pain, been-. used - for agricultural -
product: on,, for- at - least,. I of; the -last. 5.. years?-`
5.. Is. an: a--rchaeoloqi�cal- or historical..site, located: in• the• planning:
area?, (References:- NCPM,,*., 420-GM 401;. National Register-' o.f
Historic: Places),.
No
Yes- -- It, yes,, have. steps. been- taken, to ensure. the.
protection: of, this areal-1-
Are, there: any; prime-, unique, orlocally important farmlands in
the operating: iinit?-, (,References: 3-10-GM,):
No,
Yes ­ If yes. -I ...... *Identify- on:. a., soils map. or- legend.
T. Wi.1-3--.- the"- action-.. xesu t. in, sodbusting7✓ -
No. Yes.
0.. Will. the- action- result in. swampbusting?..
No Yes:
v
9-. Is there- a- potential f or- c.ontroversy?.'; From. whom?r MI&L,;
No.: LZ yes!

10. Are permits required?/_Should.the person contact permit agencies?
No ✓ Yes
When an environmental factor or resource is identified on the
site, the user will refer to the appropriate reference for policy
and document the appropriate action in the notes portion of this
form.
/�
NOTES, DOCUMENTATION, FOLLOW-UP
ORM RC5-i k."+l04

40 7
I'M
43 1
Milk
'I All
-4

b
rn
lZI
tin
An
f Cv✓'
`J �.
,r- � '�� lL }I u
4 • �Y �i _-�
I a \, '.
__a �J R /•".
.!2u
NJ
1 � I/r c •s{":
1 \
� 'r:Q I li "I�,, `�C.`o�
row lfUlf.
�_. � �y`J--.
II} Il' 11 701
Al.
5i
11,4' 4�:*
�. .�»_ �� e�
'�� ` �:/ : p'� t
� +r��� ~1 {� x���
'jj'f.
cc%
` �' Y� � � \e' 1
1 •• r � ll� ��:t f
� 1 .,l 1 ft;-R
WA
NVI

02Z

SCS-ENG-S38 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rev. 5-70 C� Ir t SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SU[TABILiTY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
FARMER'S NAME A '01- DISTRICT
r. • I
• • SHEET NO. WORK
CROPLAND—ACRESWATERSHED AREA MEASUREMENTS
ACRES TOTAL —ACRES POND CLASS i WORK UNIT CONSERVATIONIST
—WOODLAND—
-SKETCH OF PROPOSED POND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS. WERE MADE .(Approx. scale I" feet),
L.ocata reference point in center line of dam and identify on sketch,
■■■■■■■®®®®®
®■■■■.■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■N■■■■■E■NNNE■
■
■
■NNE■■■■■MMEMI®N■■■NN■■
■■■■■■■■■E■■
■■■■■■■INN■■■
■■■■■■
N■W■i■
■■M■■■■ENSN■■
■■■N■■■
■N■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■MINEMEE■■■NNEE■NNN■■■■■■
■■■■■NEE■
■E■■NE■■■MI■■■■■■NM
MENNESSOMME
INNEEMENEEMEME
•
�I����I®��31®I®I®�ml®IQ���I�I®I01�
��!■i■f■�■t®lr�fi■
®i■!■�e�i■I■10t®i■i®�■1si■i■i■
��NINI■i■I■ICI
®�■�■I�[■INlI■,■I■I■i■I■I■I■IN
®!■■f■fNi�■fl.�I�
■I■i■!!!lf■I■l®I■I■INi■f
■I■I■I■
®■!i■!EI■
■I■fl.�f■
!�!i■
af■f■!■!■
■I■i■
Nf
■
■i■I■
®�I■�■I■i■I�!■i■
■I■i1Nl■�■I■f
■�I■i■I■�■I■I■I■[■
�i�!�!!�1NI■1Ni�i■■I■i■I�i■I®!®i■!■[■i■�■
i■l■f■'
I■�■l'�■I�■�■i■I■I■
■i■�■I�P,���1■i■i■�®i®'■I■�.■[■�■�
��'
I�1■I■itl�il�!�l�■I■i(l�II■'.■I■I■I■1■■I■I■1■!■
®mil
f�l■I■1■!�1
■
■i■�■�®�■
■I■!■I■1■!■I■!■
■I

CERTIFICATION CPTT;CKLIST
�.v u
r7,
T 0-T.XT[;'17'AT' ThTFl117ANATTnW �
Farm Name/Owner: R r it,,
Address: U 6,y(~ 9'� f+]PkaV1Sr»l!-t
Telephone: t S- 0 6 I
Type/Size Operation: V3 Z0- �46dJ'
2. STORAGE AND TREATMENT
Storage Structure Capacity? 3
Permanent Storage $ �3�2 U
Temporary Storage
i
Is there at least 60 days temporary storage, Pius 24 hour,
25 year storm storage and I foot of freeboard?
. YES NO
Is temporary storage above seasonal high water table?
YES NO
Is permanent storage at least 6 feet deep?
`ES NO
Is structure a lagoon or holding pond ( )?
Is surface water diverted from structure?
YES NO
Js erosion control adequate? YES
Is dam free of all dam safety issues? YES NO
Dike Top Width? -— feet
Is all vegetation (trees) on dikes less than 2" in diameter?
YES NO
Assess Seepage Potential of Existing Waste Storage
Stricture
SP type soils -- High seepage potential
y SM type soils -- Med. Seepage potential
)<1 SC type soils -- Low Seepage Potential
CUCH type soils -- Very Low Seep. Pot
Where seepage is a high or medium risk, NRCS will
advise landowner of potential seepage and recommend
and offer a more detailed investigation at the landowner's
re<luest.
Does structure appear to be sealed and free from leaks?
YES NO
TECH SPEC' '-A IST ��-4
DATE `
3. COLLECTION
Number of houses 61 -2 f
Are houses adequately sealed, without leaks and able to
convey waste to storage area? � NO
4. APPLICATION AND MANAGEMENT
Does producer have access to adequate irrigation
equipment? YE NO
Type !'S D T C-,wJy-,
Available from: Ad Ljn
Total acres available for land application of waste
Inv acres
Type of crop to be grown C-&n 1�
Has crop actually been planted now? NO
Are minimum required separation buffers from perennial
streams, houses, wells, etc.properly addressed?
Describe
NO Describe
Can an approved waste plan be written for this operation?
Q<n NO -
CERTIFICATION DECISION
If any questions in blocks 2, 3 or 4 above are answered
"NO", then certification cannot proceed until these
issues are resolved; otherwise, proceed with
certification.
Can certification proceed for this operation with the
present existing onsite conditions? YES
If NO, describe needed measures
kL,� ` d "� '

Operator:===_________ __________________====>Billy Kilpatrick
County:========__________________________===>Duplin
Date:==========___________________________==>03/15/96
Dist. to nearest residence(other than owner):
ft.
sows (farrow to finish):____________ ___ ___>
sows (farrow to feeder):,____________________>
head (finishing only):______________________>
4320
sows (farrow to wean):===-_===--T___=_____-_>
head (wean to feeder):______________________>
Ave. Live Weight for other operations(lbs.):>
Storage volume for sludge accum. (cu. ft.):=>
0
Treatment Volume (min. 1 cu. ft./lb.):==_-__>
1.0
25 Year - 24 Hour Rainfall (in.):==__-______>
7.5
Rainfall in excess of evaporation (in.)===__>
7.0
Drainage area of buildings & lots (sq. ft.):>
Volume of wash water (gallons/day)====______>
Temporary storage period (days):===_________>
180
Freeboard(ft.):===___--------------- ___-___>
1
Side slopes (inside lagoon):________________>
3 1
Inside top length (ft.):___________________>
456.5
Inside top width (ft.):==___________________>
280.5
Top of dike elevation (ft.):________________>
50
Bottom of lagoon elevation (ft.):==_________>
38
Seasonal high water table(SHWT) elev.(ft.):=>
44
Total required volume:_____________> 880346
cu. ft.
Actual design volumet=====__=__====>1113081.8
cu. ft.
Stop pumping el. (> or = to 44.0 ft SHWT>
44.3 ft.
(> or = to 44.0 ft Min)
Required minimum treatment volume: 583200
cu. ft.
Volume at stop pumping elevation: 578669
cu. ft.
Start pumping elev.:_______________________>
48.3 ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation: 1027580
cu. ft.
Actual volume less 25yr-24hr rain: 1033052
cu. ft.
NOTE: Verify that temp. storage is adequate:
Req. volume to be pumped:====> 217116
cu. ft.
Actual volume to be pumped:==> 448911
cu. ft.

Operator:====___ __ ___________====>Billy Kilpatrick
County:===______________________________====>Duplin
Date:====_________________________,_____====>3/15/96
Dist. to nearest residence(other than owner):
ft.
sows (farrow to finish):====_--_-----_______>
sows (farrow to feeder):____________________>
head (finishing only):===______________ =___>
4320
sows (farrow to wean):=========_____________>
head (wean to feeder):===__--_______===-____>
Ave. Live Weight for other operations(lbs.):>
Storage volume for sludge accum. (cu. ft.):=>
0
Treatment Volume (min. 1 cu. ft./lb.):==____>
1.0
25 Year - 24 Hour Rainfall (in.):==_=____-__>
7.5
Rainfall in excess of evaporation (in.)===__>
7.0
Drainage area of buildings & lots (sq. ft.):>
Volume of wash water (gallons/day)====______>
3888
Temporary storage period (days):===_________>
270
Freeboard(ft.):__________________R-=-=-____>
1
Side slopes (inside lagoon):===_____________>
3 1
Inside top length {ft.):==________-______=__>
456.5
Inside top width (ft.):_____________________>
280.5
Top of dike elevation (ft.):==___=_________=>
50
Bottom of lagoon elevation (ft.):==__=______>
38
Seasonal high water table(SHWT) elev.(ft.):=>
44
Total required volume:====__=======> 1091899
cu. ft.
Actual design volume:====______====>1113081.8
cu. ft.
Stop pumping el. (> or = to 44.0 ft SHWT>
ft.
(> or = to 44.0 ft Min)
Required minimum treatment volume: 583200
cu. ft.
Volume at stop pumping elevation:-1135982
cu. ft.
Start pumping elev.:W=====__________________>
ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation:-1135982
cu. ft.
Actual volume less 25yr-24hr rain: 1033052
cu. ft.
NOTE: Verify that temp. storage is adequate:
Req. volume to be pumped:====> 428669
cu. ft.
Actual volume to be pumped:==> 0
cu. ft.

I--
INLOf
(Ij

� _? - - �f 1 r ; r

': ';r `.•i _ �� E�J.ri�F / �.I � I Y5. SfI rL y� '� r`•1 "s,
Ij J
r'r -1� �r •t. } f � t i ->;;! ., 7f'i4':- l rf •'^�+'•1 r
t, - ?L r � 1 w !• •i n.
s ;`!v t.A r 1. f,4 �t l y�� 4 S c •r, .�1.,
I+-[r ti Y� r f, r f r 1 d �' a I il. 1 '�" •r i,
r T
.r5 '}'t`S�f I.1S,.:�. �,•;i Sr.' ; _• t k}rT: t 1.•� ; _ .1�
-�.•r'Y+L+',.Y -' � h 3 i 1 .� fl y Y! ;1 �5-. j l r. f.. .
XN
wA,
a ��{ , h 'S 6r..'i F r - 5. 1.'•'' r ' Y 3 '' ,.hr r <' J � P r ;
r' r' '; x4S'4 ! •''r
^Ir .
C
F L
F S t <
' •.� •i. 4 � � 1 � R t
p�; ,fir -.f r.-jl> i t•. y� y.: �• `-•"'``.. ..?', `' ':1 sr, .
•,fitr; r {� ' �};i :,11'1"��.'"j'ta'" , r7 `L r 5 ,�-'''.;l} J �, x.
_�1 �?i%g if 'r 5qt>y y a'� 1 4 r-' 4s•- �, .• �,. ^' R tr x� Sr7 F y I , s -, s. y � �'"i
'r"S4Si 1''°f.��: i��',i.°�! x�ii�lrrlr' .x St ,� .; srr' S �r ... ,.-ti.• •1 S.t ..a. t_ � a :v, _- ., _� � .. * �'..- .t, l.'

Operator: BILLY KILPATRICK County: DUPLIN
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner):
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
4
Date: 08/27/91
2500.0 feet
0 sows (farrow to finish) x 1417 lbs. _
0 sows (farrow to feeder) x 522 lbs. _
2880 head (finishing only) x 135 lbs, —
0 sows (farrow to wean) x 433 lbs. _
0 head (wean to feeder) x 30 lbs. _
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) _
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 388800 lbs. SSLW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW
r Treatment Volume(CF)/Ib. SSLW= 1 CF/lb. SSLW
Volume = 388800 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
0 lbs
0 lbs
388800 lbs
0 lbs
0 Ibs
388800 lbs
Volume 0.0 cubic feet ; "Owner requests no sludge storage.
Sludge will be removed as needed."
4. TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME
Inside top length 300.0 feet ; Inside top width 225.0 feet
Top of dike at elevation 45.4 feet
Freeboard 1.0 feet; Side slopes 2.5 : 1 (Inside lagoon)
Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation 44.4 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation 33.4 feet
Seasonal high water table elevation 0.0 feet
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SSIENDI SSIEND2 SSISIDEI SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 295.0 220.0 11.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH " WIDTH =
295.0 - 220.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH " WIDTH
240.0 165.0
64900.0 (AREA OF TOP)
39600.0 (AREA OF BOTTOM)

AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH ` WIDTH ` 4
267.5 192.5 205975.0 - (AREA OF MIDSECTION ` 4)
CU. FT. = [AREA TOP + (4 *AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] ' DEPTH/6
64900.0 205975.0 39600.0 1.8
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT TOTAL DESIGN LIQUID LEVEL = 569204 CU. FT.
5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
` Lagoon (top of dike)
Length • Width =
300.0 225.0 67500.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
Length " Width =
0.0 0.0 0.0 square feet
TOTAL DA 67500.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period t riod to b e 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Approximate daily production of manure in OF/LB SSLW 0.00136
Volume = 388800 Lbs. SSLW ` CIF of Waste/Lb.tDay ` 180 days
Volume = 94947 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
180 days storage17.48 gallons
per CF

/ 5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall
Volume = 7.0 in " DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 39375.0 cubic feet
5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.5 inches / 12 inches per foot " DA
Volume = 42187.5 cubic feet
TOTAL`REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A.
5B.
5C.
5D.
TOTAL
6. SUMMARY
Total required volume
94947 cubic feet
0 cubic feet
39375 cubic feet
42188 cubic feet
176510 cubic feet
565310 cubic feet
Total design volume avail. 569204 cubic feet
Min. req, treatment volume plus sl plus sludg ge accumulation
7.0 inches
388800 cubic feet
At elev. 41.4 feet; Volume is 385867 cubic feet (t (end pumping)
Total design volume less 25yr-24hr storm is 527017 cubic feet
At elev. 43.7 feet; Volume is 524402 cubic feet (start pumping)
Seasonal high water table elevation 0.0 feet
OPPROVED
7. DESIGNED
v�
DATE: DATE:/�` J

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
------------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment with minimum odor
control. The time required for the planned fluid level to be
reached may vary due to soil conditions,flushing operations, and
the amount of fresh water added to the system.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent runoff from the field or damage
to crops.
The following items. are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to-1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment B)
before land application.
3. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches eleva-
tion 44.3 as marked by permanent markers. Stop pump -out when
the fluid level reaches elevation 42.1 or before fluid depth is
less than 6 feet deep (this prevents the loss of favorable
bacteria) .
4.- The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.4
inch per hour.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed

,to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
B. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.
SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS
-----------------------
AREA TO BE SEEDED: 2.5 ACRES
USE THE SEED MIXTURE INDICATED:
i50 LBS. FESCUE GRASS @ 60 LBS./ACRE
(BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER 15 TO NOVEMBER 30
0 LBS. 'PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS @ 60 LBS./ACRE.
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1)
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO JUNE 30
--26 LBS. HULLED BERMUDA GRASS @ 8 LBS./AC.
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL I TO JULY 31
7i.LBS. RYE GRAIN @ 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
0 LBS. RYE GRASS @ 40'LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMBER 1 TO MARCH 30
LBS.
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
2500 LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (1000 LBS./ACRE)

5 TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
250 BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 BALES/ACRE)
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 8
LBS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
----------------------
Owners name -=:BILLY KILPATRICK County:DUPLIN
Mail Address-: 0
Type of production unit----:FEED-FIN
Type of waste facility ----- :Anaerobic Lagoon
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a.
given storage capacity. When the waste reaches the designed
level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients
in the -animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of j
commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses -nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests j
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for I
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste

-• t i
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report from your waste management facility.
The design of your waste management facility is based on the
following: `
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year:
----------------------------------
2880 animals x 1.9 tons waste/animal/yr= 5472 tons
total waste
Page 2
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen Produced Per Year:
-----------------------------------------------------
2880 animals x 2.30 lbs. N/animal/year = 6624 lbs./yr
Available N
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should
plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in
a timely manner. Your facility is designed for 180 days of
storage. Therefgre, it will need to be pumped every 6
months. -
Tract Field Soil Crop Yield Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month to
No. No. Type Code Per Ac. Used Apply
7590 11 AuB 6 7 Tons 400 51.2 20480 MAR-AUG
----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------

Total 51.2 20480
Available Nitrogen 6624
Surplus Or Deficit -13856
Crop codes: 1=Cereal grain; 2=Corn; 3=Fescue; 4=Range Gr. Bermuda
5=Control Grazed Bermuda; 6=Hayland Bermuda
Narrative of Operation:
------------------------
Call the Soil and Water Conservation District Office after you
receive waste analysis report to obtain the amount per acre to
apply and the irrigation application rate prior to applying
waste. �-
Prepared by: L L1� 1c��L' n t�GtA
Name Title Date
.Concurred in by: � JO -91
Producer Date
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
------------------------------------------------------------
Clearing:
All trees and brush shall be removed from the construction area
before any excavating or fill is started. Stumps will be removed
within the area of the foundation of the embankment and fill areas
and all excavated areas. All stumps and roots exceeding one (1)
inch in diameter shall be removed to a minimum depth of one (1)
foot. Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The
foundation area shall be loosened thoroughly before placement of
embankment material.

• Cut-off Trench:
A cut-off trench (when specified) shall be installed as shown in
the plans.
Construction:
-------------
Construction of excavated and earthfill areas shall be performed to
the neat lines and grades as planned. Deviations from this will
require prior approval of the SCS. Earthfill shall not be placed
in standing water and reasonable compaction of the fills shall be
performed by the construction equipment or sheeps-foot roller during
placement. The embankment of the lagoon shall be installed using
the more impervious materials. Construction of fill heights shall
include ten (10) percent for settlement. To protect against seepage,
when areas of unsuitable material are encountered, they will need to
be excavated a minimum of one (1) foot below grade and backfilled and
compacted with a suitable material (ie-CL,SC,CH). Refer to the soils
investigation information in the plans for special considerations.
Precautions should be taken during construction to prevent excessive
erosion and sedimentation. � �t� vJ E :c �� C" n't&� .
Vegetation:
All exposed embankment and other bare constructed areas shall be
seeded to the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after
construction.

Fill shrink/swell
percent: 1.20 Cut
shrink/swell percent:
1.00
Iterating to balancing
within 10.0 cubic yards...
delta
Cut
Fill
CUT - FILL
0.00
12367.33
12367.49
-•0.16
-0.00
10959.14
14537.91
-3578.76
0.00
10959.08
14538.02
-3578.94
-0.55
12262.1.6
12519.00
-256.84
-0.59
12367.40
12367.41
-0.01
Lower "Proposed"
by 0.59 feet.
Project: SILLY KILPATRICK
Drawing: SHT1
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: using Sitework

DaWlioht
........... I ...........
............ ...... ............... ...............................
................................ ..............................
L A
...................................... ......
�1415-;-4-1 .................. .................................. ........
�.41&;.4-1 ..............................................................
Plot of all data for the surface:
Balanced
Project: . BILLY KILPATRICK
Drawing: 5HTI
Number:
Location:
Sid Cate:
Engineer:
Owner:
Eatimator:
Prepared bW: using Sitswork
34, Gi
45,11,
21
06,12

Oriantation: -46.0 Z Magnification: 11.7 Inclination: 20.0
60. a
46.0
46.0
44.0
42.0
40.0
35. 9
36.0
34.0
5
Lower Loft
S
I
30 Mesh Surface
Existing
Project: BILLY KILPATRICK
Drawing: SHT1
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared bW: using Sitswork
3D Moeh 5urfaca

Orientation: -46.0 Z Magnification: 10.9
Inclination: 20.0
Lower Left 3D Mesh Surface
3D Mesh Surface
Balanced
Project: BILLY KILPATRICK
Drawing: SHT1
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared bV: using Sitework

0"
asp ..........
Plot of the contour data for the surface:
Balanced
Project: BILLY KILPATRICK
Drawing'. SHT1
Number:
Location:
Sid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
lEstimator:
IPrepared bW: using Sitewark

Crmt- amem-C
Vm.of t- of �Yo
-TYPICAL. VE7--ItiV ap A oN �
Fron+ TI ,,4d�,41 INV52f4;5 F
4� t7i k,fi L. EI.�✓A'r7�f�l -41
-07ML M91644
erpzMae ta,.fv, 44-41
'1'aP IV I PrI4 e.:POTTL S P
i-ropjaL*v_a'ri44.J AEAt
1
sau oszr , 7QEATMO
PIPE- PwTwa I
�i

U. S" Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
NC-ENG--34 - -
September 1980
File Code: 210
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
Landowner ! I a G C-� County LC P� 1. A-1
Community or. Group No. Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam Ft. Length of Flood Pool Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. Elev.:Est. Elevation
Kind of :Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length: Width: Slope: Land Use Improvements Above :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain: Flood Plain
Ft. Ft. Ft. Ft.
3
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach o S In /^ downstream,
3::�o +7ee`j- Woo CZDCLn rvue, G ` VV 1I�
IN b tZxl e. �o n c
n v-f- t o C- aid i h --o
Hazard Classification of Dam a, b, c).(see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classificationa, II, 1II, IV, V)
� � q-� ive
By 6 Date 'I--
name title
Concurred By
name title
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date

}
lY r'k e � I�� dui' ,�T 4 � - `r .ta '� ,��. �: *• y�°` 4
Fig.{:"{'
r 3f' y
044
e
E ,tNi;

`
�
^
UNIllED STATEB
DEF`ARTME�T OF
AGRl�i Lll1RE
�ugust 6, 1991
EOIL POST �FFICE BUX Z77
COJSERVA�IQN KENA�SV%LLE, �C 2334�
�ICE 919-296-212l
MrBillKi
y 1patrick
Po�t �ffi�� 8ox 94
Kenanaville, North �arolina �8349
Dear Billv:
The sjte, Iucatsd BtaLe Rua� 137S, has been approved for a
4 X 720 hog operatioe havanot�er Iist c�f person� that
have site approval and are awajting a desig� from our
of�ics. Names are a�de� t� t�at list as peopIe notify us
�hat they have all details set�led aod are ready tu b�i�6.
Please motif',uhen you have all of your 1.1etailc settlsd
suCh as fim�ncio, |and acquisiti�n, etc. so that we mav ad�
yuur name to the list of persons ready for
Sinrerely,
She�la Y. Jnhnson
' SoiI ConservaonisL
epc/os"re

P. O. BOX 277
s- t United States Soil
Department of Conservation KEHANSVILLE, NC 28349
Agricufture Service TELEPHONE 919-29G-1958
-----------------------------------------------------------------
WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY SITE EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN
TO: S
LOCATION OF SITE
PRODUCER__///
C 4ij.rvi//e C
LAI)
�SR 3 .-27ile.r �fl` �C' KeAmnJvIlle
SIZE OF PROPOSED OPERATION
IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR LAGOON? YES NO SOIL CLASS. /A/aAL-
DISTANCE FROM THE LAGOON SITE TO NEAREST RESIDENCE OTHER THAN
LANDOWNER OR HIS TENANT 009� 2—z ,n .
NUMBER OF HOUSES WITHIN 2000 FEET OF LAGOON SITE
ACREAGE/CROP REQUIRED TO PUMP EFFLUENT 1,1 fG
DOES LANDOWNER HAVE ENOUGH ACREAGE YES =ff�M NO
IF NO, DOES LANDOWNER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE ACREAGE? YES NO
WILL FACILITY INVOLVE ALTERING WETLANDS? YES NO ,
IF THE ABOVE QUESTION CONCERNING WETLANDS IS CHECKED "YES", THE
LANDOWNER IS HEREBY ADVISED THAT THIS CONSTRUCTION MAY REQUIRE
PERMITS FROM THE ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS. IT IS THE LANDOWNERS
RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE.IF.PERMITS..ARE NECESSARY AND TO
OBTAIN THE REQUIRED PERMITS. THE ARMY CORP REPRESENTATIVE FOR
DUPLIH COUNTY IS:
JEFF RICHTER,
US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS
P. O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NC 28402
TELEPHONE [phone]G36
DOES SITE MEET SCS CRITERIA FOR WASTE TREATMENT FACILITIES?
YES / NO
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS lcte�
.03
SIGNATURE
40 &-, retm,
E
O The Sol Consmvatlon Service
Is an agency of the .
Department of Agriculture

I
SCS-ENG-538 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rev. 5-70 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
Eel • . .•
CROPLAND-ACRESWATERSHED AREA MEA.SUREMENTS
WOODLAND -ACRES WORK
SKETCH OF ••.•sSED *POND SHOWINGBORINGS WERE MADE.. .
Locate petercnce point 'm center line of dam and Identify on sketch.
■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■
■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■
ONE
■■■■
■EM■■■■■■■■■■
ME
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■
■■■■■
■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■Mons
■■
■■■■■■■■■MINIM■■
■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■MINIM■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■M■■■■■■■■■■■■■■INN
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
MEW�■���'��'���:�iml!!I■I®1®!m!■Im!mI01®IDi©
®�IMld��l■I■ICE■■I■���.�1■IMIMI■I■I■!■!■1■I■f■
i®���I■ice!■I®Ir�TI,
■I■i�('L�l■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■IMI■1■
®�!■I■i3�i�l■l�l,�■I■ICfiIT�s�JI■I■I■I■I■1■1■1■I■I■
®�I�1QI�iti�
■
�I�
■
■
�IHRI4�■�■
■I■E■
■I■�■1■IM
Lam!©I■I■III!■!©,'�i■■i■I�,�l■I■I■1®1■f■I■f
f■i■f■
F��I■I■!�!�I■l�I�:?�!■'�l�h�l■1■1■1■I■I■I�f
■I■I■
��I
i■�!■
Imi.�1i�.■1■I�3ii►�L:i01■i■i■I■I■I■�■�■f■i■
ItI■I■I■I�i�l■1■IlC�iIN1l
I■I■I■I■I■!■
■
■I
■
■
�I■f
■IE�I■1■I�i�1':
!■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I
I
I
I
'
�
I■ICI■1■I�+!!�
IMI■!yJl■'■i■I■f■!■!■1■i■I■1■
Sea s u n z 1 W I�-Zo I a bL 5 b`t I C'.�mS�v

d
RECEIVED
VATIER QUAU p(SECT10N
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN - 998
PHONE NUMBERS
Now Pn9
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY (DWQ) [phone]
EMERGENCY MANAGEMNET SERVICES (EMS) [phone]
SOiL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SWCD) [phone]
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS) [phone]
COOPERATIVE EXTERSiON SERVICE (CES) [phone]
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave you property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every
effort to ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible
location for all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should
take.
Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may ore may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed belwo.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that cause the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed
to flowing leaks -possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch from the embankment to catch all
seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. if holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side wails and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.

2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage notes, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours call your DWQ regional office; Phone - -. After
hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility number, telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2
above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of
the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been
under taken, and the seriousness of the sitution.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phone number.
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Helath Department. '
d. Contact CEs, phone number - , local SWCD office phone number - -, and local
NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number -
4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's Department and explain you
problem to them and ask the person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair or problem to minimize off -
site damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Addres,<
c. Contractors Phone:
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting
Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: AlP_e-5
b. Phone: 910- au,- z12,1
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste managment plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
2

.f
. . . . . . . . . . . .

3l-�'%
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
March 8, 1999
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dennis Ramsey, Environmental Supervisor
Water Quality, Non -discharge Branch
INCEM'A
IT . a
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FROM: Rick Shiver, Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Wilmington Regional Office
SUBJECT: Enforcement Report
William R. Kilpatrick
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Facility Number: 31-97
Duplin County
Attached please find the subject enforcement report which was prepared by Mr. Brian
Wrenn of the Wilmington Regional Office. The report concludes that William R. Kilpatrick
violated Title 15A NCAC 2H .0217 and G.S. 143-215.1, by making an outlet to waters of the
State without the appropriate permit.
It is recommended that appropriate civil penalties be assessed in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A (a)(6).
If you have any further questions, please contact me at 910-395-3900.
ATTACHMENTS
blw :31-97.mem
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL Z 418 220 475
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. William R. Kilpatrick
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
463 Routledge Street
Kenansville, NC 28349
S ubj ect:
Dear Mr. Kilpatrick:
0
OL
NCDENR
NORTH CARO!_INA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 24, 1999
NOTICE OF RECOMMENDATION FOR ENFORCEMENT
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Kenansville, NC
Duplin County =-
This letter is to notify you that the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality is considering
submittal of a recommendation for enforcement action to the Director of the Division of Water Quality. The
recommendation concerns the violation of Title 15A oftheNorth Carolina Administrative Code, Chapter 2, Subchapter
2H, Section .0217(d). On February 1, 1999, in response to regional office notification, Mr. Brian Wrenn from the
Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality inspected your animal operation and the lagoon(s) serving
this operation. It was observed that a recycle wastewater line had ruptured and leaked animal waste into an adjacent
storm water diversion. The waste traveled along the diversion and discharged to Buckskin Swamp. Buckskin Swamp
are class "C-Swamp" waters of the State in the Northeast Cape Fear River Basin.
If you have an explanation for this violation that you wish to present, please respond in writing to me within ten
(10) days after receipt of this Notice. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action is still deemed
appropriate, your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for his consideration.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, -please contact Mr. Brian L. Wrenn, or myself at the
Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely, 1
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Compliance Section
Wilmington Files
S:\WQS\BRIANW\ENF99\31-97.ROE
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX 9I0-350-2004
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
February 10, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL 4 Z 418 220 474
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. William R. Kilpatrick
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
463 Routledge Street
Kenansville, NC 28349
� Mko.,WA
i
NCDENR
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: ]notice of Violation
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Farm Number: 31-97
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Kilpatrick:
You are hereby notified that Billy Kilpatrick Farm, which has been permitted to have a
nondischarge permit for an animal waste disposal system pursuant to 1 SA NCAC 2H .0217 and G.S
14).215, 1, has been found to be in violation of its Animal Waste Permit AWS310097.
On February 1, 1999, in response to regional office notification, Mr. Brian Wrenn from the
Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality inspected your animal operation and
the ]agoon(s) serving this operation. It was observed that a recycle wastewater line had ruptured and
leaked animal waste into an adjacent storm water diversion. The waste traveled along the diversion
and discharged to Buckskin Swamp. Buckskin Swamp are class "C-Swamp" waters of the State.in
the Northeast Cape Fear River Basin.
This is a violation of Part I. Performance Standards, Section 1 and Part II. Operation and
Maintenance Requirements, Section 1 of the Animal Waste Permit AWS310097.
The Division of Water Quality may proceed to revoke Billy Kilpatrick Farm permit unless
the following conditions are completed:
1. Immediate]y eliminate the discharge of wastewater and/or list actions to correct the noted
violation.
2. Make any and all modifications needed to ensure there will be no future discharges.
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone 910-39i-3900 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. \ illiam R. Kilpatrick
February 10. 1999
Page 2
To remain a permitted facility, you must notify this office in writing within seven (7) days
of the receipt of this notice, what actions will be taken to comply with your waste management plan.
Failure to comply with the above conditions will cause the existing animal waste management
system serving your animal operation to be considered in operation without a permit as required by
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1.
Please be advised that this assessment does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from
taking enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violations.
When all required corrective actions are complete, please notify this office in writing. If you
have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to contact either Mr. Brian L.
Wrenn, of our Wilmington Office at (910)-395-;900 or Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone],
ext. 581.
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: -Harold Jones, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation
Kenneth Best, Duplin County Health Department
Don Butler, Carroll's Foods, Inc.
DWQ Operations Branch File
Wilmington Files
S:IWQSIBRIANW\ENF99131-97.N0V

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF DUPLIN
IN THE MATTER OF
WILLIAM R. KILPATRICK
FOR VIOLATIONS OF PERMIT
15A NCAC 2H .0217
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
File No. DD
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.6A, I, A. Preston
Howard, Jr., P.E., Director of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. William R. Kilpatrick owns and operates the Billy Kilpatrick Farm, a swine animal
operation along SR 1378 in Duplin County.
B. Billy Kilpatrick Farm was permitted as a nondischarge facility on December 7, 1998
in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217.
C. On February 1, 1999, in response to regional office notification, Mr. Brian Wrenn
observed that a recycle wastewater line had ruptured and leaked animal waste into an
adjacent storm water diversion. The waste traveled along the diversion and discharged
to Buckskin Swamp. Buckskin Swamp is class "C-Swamp" waters of the State in the
Northeast Cape Fear River Basin.
D. William R. Kilpatrick had no valid permit for the above described activity.
E. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $520.69.

Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
11. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. William R. Kilpatrick is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant
to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. A permit for this animal waste management system is required in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H .0217 and G.S. 143-215.1.
C. Buckskin Swamp within the Northeast Cape Fear River Basin constitutes waters of the
State within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.1 pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6).
D. The above -cited discharge is a violation of the nondischarge permit.
E. William R. Kilpatrick may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S.
143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more than ten thousand
dollars ($10,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person for failing to act
in accordance with the terms, conditions or requirement of a permit required by G.S.
143-215.1.
F. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Wiiliam R.
Kilpatrick pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b)(8).
G. Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-215.6A, the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources has the authority to issue civil penalties in this
matter. The Secretary has delegated this authority to the Director of DWQ pursuant
to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14313-10.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, William R. Kilpatrick is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
for discharging waste to the waters of the State in violation of
15A NCAC 2H .0217.
$ TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is percent of the
maximum penalty authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A.
$ 520.69 Enforcement costs
$ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE

As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have considered the
factors listed in G.S. 143B-282. 1 (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date) A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF DUPLIN
IN THE MATTER OF
WILLIAM R. KILPATRICK
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
FOR VIOLATIONS OF CONDITION
OF ANIMAL WASTE PERMIT NO.
AWS310097 BY FAILING TO PREVENT
THE DISCHARGE OF ANIMAL WASTE
TO WATERS OF THE STATE
File No. PC
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-21 5.6A, I, A. Preston
Howard, Jr., P.E., Director of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
L FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. William R. Kilpatrick owns and operates the Billy Kilpatrick Farm, a swine operation
along NCSR 1378 in Duplin County.
B. William R. Kilpatrick was issued Animal Waste Permit No. AWS310097 on December
7, 1998, effective on that date, with an expiration date of April 30, 2003.
C. Condition No. 1 of the "Performance Standards" of the issued permit requires "The
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and transmission system permitted under
this permit shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to
prevent the discharge of pollutants to surface waters, wetlands, or ditches." Condition
No. 1 of the "Operation and Maintenance Requirements" requires "The collection,
treatment, and storage facilities, and land application equipment and sites shall be
properly maintained and operated at all times."

D. On February 1, 1999, in response to regional office notification, Mr. Brian Wrenn
inspected the Billy Kilpatrick Farm. It was observed that a recycle wastewater line had
ruptured and leaked animal waste into an adjacent storm water diversion. The waste
traveled along the diversion and discharged to Buckskin Swamp. Buckskin Swamp is
class "C-Swamp" waters of the State in the Northeast Cape Fear River Basin.
F. The costs to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $100.00.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
IL CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. William R. Kilpatrick is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant
to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. Animal Waste Permit No. AWS310097 is required by G.S. 143-215.1.
C. William R. Kilpatrick violated condition No. 1 of the "Performance Standards" and
condition No. 1 of the "Operation and Maintenance Requirements" of Animal Waste
Permit No. AWS310097.
D. William R. Kilpatrick may be assessed civil penalties pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2) which provides that a civil penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars
per violation may be assessed against a person who violates or fails to act in accordance
with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1.
E. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against William R.
Kilpatrick pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.I(b)(8).
F. Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-215.6A, the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources has the authority to issue civil penalties in this
matter. The Secretary has delegated this authority to the Director of DWQ pursuant
to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14313-10.

Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
William R. Kilpatrick is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$ for violating condition No. 1 of the "Performance Standards" and
condition No. 1 of the "Operation and Maintenance Requirements" of
Animal Waste Permit No. AWS310097 by discharging animal waste
to waters of the State.
$ TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is percent of the maximum
penalty authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A.
$ 100.00 Enforcement costs
$ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I considered the
factors listed in G.S. 14313-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health,
or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date) A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ANIMAL OPERATIONS
ENFORCEMENT CASE REPORT
Violator: William R. Kilpatrick
Contact Person: Same
Address: 463 Routledge Street, Kenansville, NC 28349
Facility Name: Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Facility #: 31-97
Receiving Stream and Classification: Buckskin Swamp of the Northeast Cape Fear River Basin, Class "C-
Swamp" waters
Regional Office: Wilmington
Inspector / Report Prepared By: Brian Wrenn
Registered Agent: (if applicable)
Address: (if applicable)
Case Narrative: On February 1, 1999, in response to regional office notification, Mr. Brian Wrenn inspected the
referenced facility. It was observed that a wastewater recycle line had ruptured and leaked animal waste into an
adjacent storm water diversion. The waste traveled along the diversion and discharged to Buckskin Swamp.
Buckskin Swamp is class "C-Swamp" waters of the State in the Northeast Cape Fear River Basin. When Mr.
Kilpatrick left the farm at approximately 5:00 pm on Saturday, January 30, 1999, the recycle system was operating
properly. Mr. Kilpatrick discovered the discharge at approximately 8:30 am on Sunday, January 31, 1999. He
notified the Wilmington Regional office of the Division of Water Quality of the discharge that same day. Evidence
indicates excessive salt build-up in the recycle line caused an elevated pressure level which exploited a weak point
in the pipe causing it to rupture. Mr. Kilpatrick indicated that his recycle pump operated at a flow rate of 5,000
gallons per hour, and the pump ran for 7 hour shifts with 5 hour breaks. The waste traveled along a storm water
diversion on the northwest side of the lagoon. This diversion runs southwest through a small wooded area and
enters into Buckskin Swamp. Waste was observed puddled in the diversion and in Buckskin Swamp. Mr.
Kilpatrick had dug pits to collect the runoff. Waste in these collection pits was pumped back into the lagoon. Mr.
Kilpatrick was advised to continue the clean up procedures. Water quality samples were taken from the diversion
area and from Buckskin Swamp (see attachments)_ Mr. Wrenn returned to the farm on February 3, 1999 to monitor
the clean up procedures. Mr_ Kilpatrick was continuing to pump out the collection pits. Mr. Kilpatrick had
discussed plans to construct a grassed waterway adjacent to the lagoon with a Carroll's Foods representative.
Farm and/or Company Compliance History: Include a covy of CAFO Designation lettersprevious NOV=s
NOD=s, previous civil assessments, etc,
The referenced facility was issued a Notice of Deficiency on September 15, 1997 for erosion on the lagoon dike
wall. On June 3, 1998, the referenced facility was issued a Second Notice of Deficiency for erosion of the lagoon
dike wall.
Amount of Waste Discharged (If applicable). If amount cannot be estimated,_ what is the rate of flow
reaching surface water:
The discharge began sometime after 5:00 pm on Saturday, January 30, 1999 and was discovered at approximately
8:30 am on Sunday, January 31, 1999. The recycle pump refills 6 flush tanks at a rate of 5,000 gallons per hour.
The recycle system is regulated by a timer that operates the pump for a 7 hour shift and then turns off for a 5 hour
break. The pump could have operated for a maximum of approximately 10.5 hours between January 30 and
January 31. This would result in a total discharge of 52,500 gallons_

Sample Results (If applicable) with locations of samples taken noted in relation to discharge point:
The results from the two samples taken on February 1, 1999 at the Billy Kilpatrick Farm are as follows (see
attachments):
Fecal Col iform
Ammonia Nitrogen,
NH3-N
TKN
NO3 + NO2
Total P
Sample Point #1
200,000 col./IOOmL
275 mg/L
339 mg/L
L95 mg/L
51.1 mg/L
Sample Point #2
2,200 col./100mL
6.18 mg/L
8.05 mg/L
0.48 mg/L
0.78 mg/L
Violator's degree of cooperation (including efforts to prevent or restore) recalcitrance:
Mr. Kilpatrick reported the spill to the Wilmington Regional Office within the time frame required by his General
Permit. He ceased the discharge upon discovery and began repairs and clean up of the discharge immediately.
Repairs on the recycle line were completed at the time of the inspection. Clean up was ongoing as of February 3,
1999.
Fish kill observed? YIN If yes, include report from WRC:
No fish kill was observed at the time of the inspection.
Mitigating Circumstances:
The discharge was a result of a mechanical failure in the recycle system.
Recommendation:
The Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality is recommending assessment of a civil penalty
to the Director of the Division of Water Quality, pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A.
Include a copy of the previously completed Animal Operations Inspection Form, pictures and site sketch of waste
flow if waste is discharged to surface waters. Also include violator's response to Notice of Recommendation for
enforcement. Ifeiting certified plan or permit condition violations, include copies ofpermil or plan.
Assessment Factors required to be considered by C. S. 143B-282.1(b):
1. The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violation:
Water Quality samples taken immediately downstream from the discharge point in the Buckskin Swamp
displayed fecal coliform bacteria levels of up to 2,200 colonies per 100 mL. This represents levels of I 1
times the assigned stream standard. Levels of other constituents found were as follows:
Sample Point 41
Sample Point 92
Ammonia Nitrogen, NH3-N 275 mg/L _ 6.18 mg/L
TKN 339 mg/L 8.05 mg/L
NO3 + NO2 1.95 mg/L 0.48 mg/L
Total P 51.1 mg/L 0.78 mg/L

2. The duration and gravity of the violation:
The discharge began sometime after 5:00 pm on Saturday, January 30, 1999 and was discovered at
approximately 8:30 am on Sunday, January 31, 1999. The recycle pump refills 6 flush tanks at a rate
of 5,000 gallons per hour. The recycle system is regulated by a timer that operates the pump for a 7
hour shift and then turns off for a 5 hour break. The pump could have operated for a maximum of
approximately 10.5 hours between January 30 and January 31. This would result in a total discharge
of 52,500 gal tons.
3. The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality:
The effects to groundwater and air were not documented. Water quality was impacted as determined by
water quality analysis.
4. The cost of rectifying the damage:
The cost to rectify the environmental damage cannot be easily estimated. The surface waters of Buckskin
Swamp are classified as Class "C-Swamp" waters of the State. Animal waste discharged into a
receiving stream will degrade water quality due to very high levels of pathogens (IE. fecal coliform
bacteria), ammonia, nutrients and other dissolved oxygen reducing constituents.
S. The amount of money saved by noncompliance:
The amount of money saved by noncompliance is not known.
6. Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally:
In the opinion of the inspector, the discharge was not willful or intentional.
7. The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which the
Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority:
The referenced facility was issued a Notice of Deficiency on September 15, 1997 for erosion on the lagoon
dike wall. On June 3, 1998, the referenced facility was issued a Second Notice of Deficiency for erosion of
the lagoon dike wall.
S. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures:
The State's enforcement costs totaled $620.69, as follows:
Staff
Wrenn, 13.0 ltrs. $242.97
Mileage (240 miles @ $0.31 per mile) $ 74.40
Photography (film & Development) $ 7.32
Laboratory costs $196.00
Administrative costs $100,00

sZ� Doom f :
1 i zB }} r 229 57130" •a r
i -1 \ / I e ra�mmenuna t,nt/aonl-r,ww,
.41.0
P B Railo
,Airport I
Z. I iR ziol1 \
Ch
3s 0eama
' 410 t
� � , � � �_�� '•�� % i _ ,�o . r j r r 1� � � �� 40.5 �� � 7S0
.Jorgensen
l �
J
i %f �./ I r { 1/' JiIJ' ,,./ 1.'1, ,.� i',,� •o {1. �.-f �-- '3 /lCem
j 4 Billy Kilp ( trick Fartq ; I
Facility 4� 1-97 1
u •R Cem �r
'p Duplin County i11
O Trailer Lacoe
\ „Cem -1 1377gx Park
yi\
ti ra
M
V,
30
45 _
,�_'"\ f' � ��i \ � �• �u. n • !fj � -ram -� ,r- ,� ? -+w ...y- -. ,y„� -+`
a ./•+. �./ .r. —__ .,w= -•"� :y._ - "� — -_ -.Iw. ."- y,,. - ....
1 �, ,•.Grp I � � 1 _- s'ek'"-" �.,,.. �- " -� �" .� i.l
I % t •ur- — _ - .� � "'r --1 .'y�' - ye- � ,. - � �.w; �,��i'y � �. �. � __ nw_ l� !
1301
y ,•�`9_�' -Y - - `'r�-�)`'1�1 /J I fe� I -'�•S 'I
-N s
l �� 1° a' •; 11`` PitalM?� y •, . am R
+- ��i , i . �� .,ly,! ?7.0 __ ... t, tl:J��,•t • -_ _ - 39.5 =1,!
1 l / Ce I i; r rt cruse�r� (n'lf ' �•• �..�' : i -
li U ��.'• `�C !f /� n \\ BM + 'u?� 1• �_ii i u• 27.2
31
f 0.8' •,'Radio•. BM. 3. __ _, - ��; '.2.1
ti• ) it Stnsth i .•.�• '. WT • 4 • �a.11 I 1��• �i E
.\ { • I ! 7p Jr Sigk�Sch: •l\',: . • -- m IGwer :,3. v x _ -�I ��'i•`• ��.
K -ins
en, ville,
�` •� IBM 38,8f
� -f� , B 1 � ��'ll• (. �1•CEvtc ti ' �.. ' •'�',�.: � , ' �.'�� __4! 1� fir, I ! 1 r � � _\

„. ice— �.. i y � �!'• �' � r it_ 1 er,l --� ! 'i_
Lq+T`tiu - - B.-�._ Tumor
atRt4 Pony a 1
Cf-S F�� _ nth �' I nrt lEE p
P
- :•�� - Nav
r1.�-� pc 5 "Da
IG
CanR,po
. - -\ 't ' \c '•' .'• t , 11horrKgw
PmE Hai KC5L'�..
Ay� °°
_ - 1 f - ! _ 903 Lt°ui _ Pink Hil r
.� � ... •• � - T � T -
/pa
�--n• 1 iui / 241
�O ` � � Ara -U F ~ Jf l� � � 1 py �'_ f •�` �^ .•N, — N E
1,0
�4o
Aa /
N.
6E57 RD 1 $ f S . I' 11 I \ ` —ram CL -' �Eyp `Io
35.00° Airport r°r I — sEar f J dal \_ r . ^� w cea y KEMnt°r t
Bpi ly K-p'atpick/Fa �-.� `_' , �'' b `
FI c i 1 it: # 31,= Wp..G tt \ .1
d �'_ ll l_C runty r�`7rN.E.Cape f fae~
VIC
1''ttt _ eGk� 4b tD
1Lenansuilk �f cE~OtD
50
cc
stefaa q
903 i R.ft
24
arc ' rf tiv 1 tE
B } a Dom- t ¢� ' 1 ` ! 241
41
ST
24
34 (50
34.92° ' e s�7r' /°o ` •~1 osr S 1f p e i \`"+'.
&-qr�\Y l fop Creek papEt4-)� -
u .� 1 i 1 �Ratlq 1
IN
`L
No �ack—aS
mnft Star
eP�'en
RIF
I i t J - eat L 1,4 1 A ---_1j, ii \, \ 0
C y I M xWell ::! 41
e _JOE
�
/ _ f
°"Ea 1>kv�' •` q0 \ _ 1 txo _ ' \ 11 1
40 R1 y
WE
AD
34.83
!, Chirquapm '� ` }o
7L8 ��” f 5 •Alt t 1 �r-� f _ v �xy SrpK � .`�' - ti. � - -
OWES RD
Jt510pE _ O�pRICE"+ sT0 I � - f / - . ,. �+ � ' .
RAV
_ E►tH�A'_ 80 ff� fAAvpky L - - - �JJ i' ` V
Clrin9uaWn
s� 41 Lookout ?"
• b!t afl' � ;�, �\� mton e..`.. ., �P.+-'o r ss

Broken Wastewater
Recycle Line
Storm V ater
Diversion
Sample Point #1
Fu�jdle1-3"Na ste
f
x
Buckskin Swamp
Sample Paint #2
Hog Houses
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Facility # 31-9 r
Duplin County
Not to scale

N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMPLAINT/EMERGENCY REPORT FORM
WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
Received by: rih L _ Wmyw, hate/Tame: Q I /qTq
7saempe rjr: Complaint: County: t
Report Received Fir=--
AJencY= PhonE MO.—�2-14 - 107$
CClpla;,,ant:
Address: Fh= No.
L► ti � iL���► Y . t' ► r_' 1. � . L �
Time and Date Occ-=ed: _ _ 1.1311ci - -
Location of Area Affected:
Surface Waters I.avolved: ✓ Groundwater Involved: Otter:
Other Agencies/SeC=ians Notified:
�JQVY�,�11g iJfA•C� I
Investigator:.R(l)>LA L . 1A)WArk ti �11.1
EPA. Region IV (404947-4062 Perri -des 1-33-3SS6 'Enurgrney Mar=grment 733-3867--We's�:'r Resevrees 733-729I
SoUd and Hazardous Wmu 733-2178 MarME Fshrrers 726-7021 Waur Supply Branch 733-2321 U.S. C—: G„=,Y 3lSD 3434881
IZ7 Cardinal Drive Extension. Wilminnton. N.C. 2$405-3845 • T'eiephone 910-395-3900 • FaxV-
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

E3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
© Other Agency - Operation Review
10 Routine 0 Complaint Q Follo►y-iit) i)f I)NN'Q 331SpeCti[)n 0 Follo%%--up of DS% C revie%V 00ther
I acility "unifier 3 Dslt:e of Inspection
�,_ I'inie �)!' lnsficction 23 fir. (hh:mm)
Permitted �j Certified ❑ Conditti"onaliv }C-ertified ❑ Registered 0 Not O erational Date Last Operuted:
Farm Name: tl�y......-k:.:As.�z.,.4:�L......l�r fr................••--......•---................_.. Co[inty:..... L� 1i#....... ....... ....-......... ...........
Owner Name: �CFS.K.........-..._.........-.......... Phone No:...�
Facility Contact: ....... .I..... 'hitle:
Mailing ,address : .................
Onsite Representative: ...............``.Ij.1Q,...... 11..?L^f�1Cf�.� ...................
Certified Operator:.. ............. W.iv. ibxcl ..... ......
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
............................................
4.1...
Integrator: .........Cr<s.". .L1 ,�............I.... ................
Operator Certification \lumber-11.4$5.........................
r--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------� .
LatitudeI..ongitude 'Z-7 • S� ®" r
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish
u 3
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
43"
❑ Gilts
❑ Soars -
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'.'
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. If dischan:e is observed. what is the estimated flow in «al/thin'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ............ Z.].................
Structur: 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
V1 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes P No
Structure 5 Structure 6
116199 C'mitinried nli honk

runiher: �� - y-I 1). of inspection
there any, immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
%rc there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any pact of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required top of dike. maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/impro.'cmcnt?
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
12. Crop type .......................
`_t_
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
13. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? Oe/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
..... . l.. ...o. deficiencies :were . . . during :this. visit:: YoU �viil:reeeive nor ftirttier ::::
eorresWHideitce:about:this visit.: •' :::: ::..:: :.:.:: .:. ::: :
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments: _1 :.�
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):-_
Z- �4.-C[.VLLil �..��1(�t G:� i-iirr� ��I�-�.i�-. Mr_ 1L:1��.�riCT� [�L i� 1tiYYh Grp '�1ti.�: t f ih.� y�,!_S C�2►/b�'('IW� �
�.-'iCP4.1-IM `+-1� �:�cb'u:-�� bic�� ��tisccv�.',`(.tJ Stlt•�, i�vt-:3% rr� �,n.;� a:`,,2 �� �� av�+, y,,�� J
Mks tt(!1n C � jL{w�� i� [(x��Cr. 1W� d Mkr t_O V_ 31Jtriit3tti i4
Atli_% i. , �',�••et'K, -yc.l� dutr�� e s w� a c . t�� c e S r�G(. Il.a. lU�r. K:1 �vt`LK
h\6-r�t-c3 �EaG ct— �ci1. (tt i�ltx:�� p�a�t•. en r� wv�vrii �. kAt1C,iiT',4-
C�ccIUb kit, 6Lcckz� [ p C ��q
�\ ���st cvil�rvro ti,c�� cc hfS
WVIL
� u,�`
i�A�k +�.�w, Lam. ,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:!j� _ Date: Z�Ii'g� 11/6/99

© Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review . .
© Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
(j Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
© Other Agency - Operation Review
Q Routine Q Complaint 10 Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
a <l ecioo �- Facility Number Time oltns)eCtion 24 hr. (hh:mm)
M Permitted P Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered I (] Not O perational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: h.:�.ks� �L�� , ~4.� 1-fart1........................................'... Cuimtv:...-b4..'."<.......................... . .................
OwnerName: ......................... NA �L1�a:1(.\C Phone No:.......---.............................................................................
Facility Contact:
J.....1..............3..............-..-...'1'itic:..........................---......,......_...................... PhoneNo:...........-.......................................
�lailinrt address: .�.3....... 4�....`.................................... .........Y }iflI1�,Y..��[ c................................. ..?U.{q........
Onsite Representative: Kk.ls ....... ......................... Integrator: ........ hC�.L���......................................................
Certified Operator:..................ALiktti....................... `1..,'?h .................. Operator -Certification Number: ...... Ohsl ....................
Location of Farm:
.......... ......-Ox. ....4Vt... S�7—G......ezl.... .....!l�r........4.....5-K.1014...--.............................................................................. i..;
r.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....i . .
Latitude 0 • ®' D� Longitude Z �� • S� ®°�
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
3 )
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars -
...... .... ..
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 14 -��
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps I❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharites & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originatcd at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a: If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'!
h. if discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. If dischar-e is observed. what is the estimated flow in ealhnin?
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagUon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure. I
Identifier:
I:rceboard (inches):
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
1/6/99 Continued ore back

,.,Amber: — 0{-� Date of Inspection
Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any pact of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
l aste Apalication
10. Are there any buffers that need trtaintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type ..,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? []Yes [-]No
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint) ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same a4gency?
0_ NQ AWaitioits or dercien.'de's .were bolted. during 11iis:iisit:. Ytiti wvilfret:eive.'nl]r ftirtiieI.
r
-.. corresporideike: about: this visit.. •. •. •....:.:.:. •. •. •. •. -. :::. :. .
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any.otbei comments. -
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):;-_
�dycsej� l�►�Y. \L�j�a iik toil_;KVQ� Un CofLI-L
o d \,e t:
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: An;
Date: -2-11 )1 1116/99

f
7-77
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
® MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: SHIPPING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1037 (910) 2W3934 (Office) 6602 Windmill Way
Wrightsville Beach, (9I0) 392-0223 (Lab) Wilmington,
CONSULTING North Carolina 28480 (910) 392- 424 (Fax) North Carolina 28405
CHEMISTS
NCDEHNR: DWQ CERTIFICATE #94, DiS CERTIFICATE #37729
Customer:
NCDEHNR-DWQ RECEIVED Date of Report : February 9, 1999
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405 FEB 16 1999 Purchase Order #:
Attn: Rick Shiver
Brian Wrenn BY: Report Number: 9-0319
Date Sampled:
Sampled By:
STREAM: 31-97
02/01 /99
Brian Wrenn
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Report To:
Copy To:
Rick Shiver
Brian Wrenn
PARAMETER
Sample ID
31-97
31-97
Lab ID
# 0716 A-B
# 0717 A-B
Fecal Coliform, colonies/100ml
200,000
2200
Nitrate + Nitrite Nitrogen, NO3 + NO2 - N mg/L
1.95
0.48
Ammonia Nitrogen, NH3-N, mg/L
275
6.18
Total Kejeldahl Nitrogen, TKN mg/L
339
8.05
Total Phosphorus, P mg/L
51.1
0.78
Reviewed b and approved for release to the client.

Lenvirochem
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC
Sample Collection and Chain of Custody,
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Collected BY: S x, ,r, L- E hr.' _ _ _- Report No:
Nam le'l' e: Intluent Effluent Well Str
oil Uther:
SAMPLE
IDENTIFICATION
COLLECTION
Camp
Grab
CI=
mg1L
LAB
ID
PRESERVATION
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
DATE
TIME
TEMP
NONE
I[CI
][,so,
IINO,
Na011
TII10
OTITER
C 7IG4
t/
ire
r
1 NU 31-97
'/��
('��
3
F
Z Ni, _
z(�
�'�=�0
C)'717
5
C
G
C
G
C
G
C
G
C
G
C
G
NOTICE — DECHLORINATION : Sampes for Ammonia, TKN, Cyanide, Phenol, and Bacteria must be dechlorinated
(0.2 ppm or less) in the field at the time of collection. See reverse side for instructions.
Temperature whenReceived: s-C GL Accepted: t/
Delivered By: Received
Comments:
By:
Resampl equested.
Date: Time:

463 Routledge St.
Kenansville, NC 28349
February 15, 1999
Mr. Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
127 North Cardinal Dr.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Dear Mr. Shiver,
RECEIVED
FEB 18 1999
BY:
The following actions were taken to comply with my waste management plan as a
result of the recent accident at my farm.
Upon immediate discovery of the ruptured recycle wastewater line, the pump was
turned off to stop the flow of wastewater. The discharge was blocked and pits were dug
to catch any runoff. All water captured was pumped back into the lagoon. Pine straw
was placed in areas along the drainage diversion to soak up excess wastewater. The
broken pipe was repaired. A grass waterway was constructed to avoid further erosion.
In order to prevent future discharges, recycle line, pumps, and surrounding ground
areas will continue to be monitored daily. It will be necessary to keep heavy equipment
from traveling along the top of the dike directly behind the houses to avoid crushing
underground lines.
Enclosed you will find a letter from my integrator, Carroll's Foods of Warsaw,
that includes their observations when they inspected the site.
Sincerely,
Bill 1patrick

r.
CARROLUS FOODS, INC.
P. O. Drawer 856
WARSAW, NORTH CAFIOLINA 28398
[phone]
February 12, 1999
Mr. William R. Kilpatrick
463 Routledge Street
Kenansville, NC 28349
Subject: NOV For Farm 31-97 Dated 2/10/99
Dear Billy,
Our office received a copy of the above notice Wednesday of this week. Based upon
the visit to your farm on February 1, 1999,1 will make the following observations:
1. It appears that you followed your Emergency Action Plan" as intended. DWO
was notified along with Carroll' Foods, Inc.
2. Your first action was to stop all pumping and flushing.
3. Using your farm equipment, you constructed swales and check dams at several
locations to impede any surface runoff.
4. The ruptured pipe was repaired, backfilled and packed to prevent erosion of the
slope.
5. Straw was placed at strategic locations to filter any remaining drainage and to
soak up small pool areas.
6. It appeared that you were in the process of constructing a grassed waterway or
drainage way along the toe of the dam. This area may need some reshaping and
reseeding.
7. We discussed the environmental advantages of the wetland down from the farm.
You agreed not to disturb the pool area but to continue to monitor the beavers to
prevent clogging the culverts and washing out the road.
You may have taken additional measures to the ones I have listed above, Regarding
future discharges of this type, you mentioned closer monitoring of all pipes and
pumps. Additional measures may be possible and I will not try to address this area.
It is very important that you follow the conditions stated in the DWO letter and
respond within the seven (7) day period.

Carroll's Foods greatly regrets that accidents of this type occur. Some things are
easy to prevent while other are difficult to predict or prevent. Carroll's appreciates
your quick response to this matter and recommends that you work closely with
DWQ. Please feel free to include this letter with your response to DWQ.
Sincerely,
Howard L. Hobson, Technical Specialist
Carroll's Foods, Inc.
cc: Deader Edwards
Bob McLeod

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
March 11, 1999
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dennis Ramsey, Environmental Supervisor
Water Quality, Non -discharge Branch
FROM: Brian L. Wrenn, Water Quality, $j'
Wilmington Regional Office
SUBJECT: Enforcement Report
William R. Kilpatrick
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Facility Number: 31-97
Duplin County
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Attached please find the response letter to the Notice of Recommendation for
Enforcement. Mr. Kilpatrick explains the discharge as being the result of a truck damaging the
recycle line. As detailed in the Enforcement Case Report, at the time of the inspection, Mr..
Kilpatrick cited salt build-up in the recycle line as the reason for the ruptured pipe.
If you have any further questions, please contact me at 910-395-3900.
ATTACHMENTS
blw :31-97.mem
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

kSh
w a-o. J-
La & n-- -L4
I

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr. Division of Water Quality Wayne McDevitt
Governor i Secretary
September 15, 1997
Billy Kilpatrick
Billy Kilpartck Farm
PO Box 94
Kenansville, NC 28349
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Facility Number: 31-97
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Kilpatrick:
On September 12, 1997 Staff from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality,
inspected your animal operation and the lagoon(s) serving this operation. It was observed that some erosion
of the clay liner has occurred on the lagoon. Large cuts were observed in various sections of the inner dike
wall of the lagoon around the inlet pipes. It is our concern that some of these gullies may become deep
enough to cut through the liner material and sacrifice the integrity of the structure. No irrigation records
were on site at the time of the inspection.
As was discussed at the time of the inspection, the cuts should be filled with a suitable clay material,
compacted and reseeded with an appropriate vegetative cover. Irrigation records should be on site at all
times. In addition, the inlet pipes should be extended further into the lagoon and the eroded areas backfilled
with clay and reseeded, and the rodent holes should be filled and reseeded. We suggest that you contact your
service company, local MRCS or Soil and Water District office for any assistance they may be able to
provide to correct the situation.
To remain a deemed permitted facility, you must notify this office in writing within fourteen (14) days
of the receipt of this notice, what actions will be taken to comply with your waste management plan. Failure
to do so may result in the facility losing it's deemed permitted status, requiring it to obtain an individual non
discharge permit.
127 Carding! Drive Extension, VrArningtan, N.C. 2M5-3945 0 Telephone [phone] + Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Billy Kilpatrick Farm
September 15, 1997
Page 2.
Please be aware it is a violation of North Carolina General Statutes and Rules to discharge wastewater
to the surface waters of the State without a permit and/or to fail to follow a certified waste management plan.
The Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources has the authority to levy a civil penalty of
not more than $10,000 per day per violation.
When the required corrective actions are complete, please notify this office in writing at the address
below. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call David Holsinger, Andy Heminger or
Brian Wrenn at 910-395-3900. ; I
Sincerely,
Brian L. Wrenn
Environmental Specialist
cc: Billy Houston, County Soil and Water Conservation
Sandra Weitzel, NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Don Butler, Carroll's Foods
Operations Branch
Wilmington Files
M

RECEIYE9 SEP 2 9 1991
September 25, 1997
Mr. Brian Wrenn
Environmental Specialist
State of North Carolina
Dept. of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Dear Mr. Wrenn:
1 have received the notice of deficiency from your
office concerning my inspection on September 12, 1997.
Please allow me 45 days to rake the recommended repairs to
comply with my waste management plan.
Thank you,
x /
Billy Kilpatrick
3+-G-7
!� ��E n Cc w i+Y

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Division of Water Quality
June 3, 1998
Certified Mail # Z 312 646 438
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Billy Kilpatrick
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
PO Box 723
Kenansville, NC 28349
/ foll
•
NCDENR
NORTM CokRouNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NAxuRAL RESOURCES
Subject: SECOND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Billy Kilpatrick `
Facility Number: 31-97
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Kilpatrick:
On May 29, 1998, staff from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality inspected your animal operation and the lagoon(s) serving this operation. It was observed
that erosion cuts on the inner dike wall of the lagoon could threaten the integrity of the structure.
A previous Notice of Deficiency was issued on September 15, 1997, based on a September 12,
1997 inspection by DWQ staff. At this time, it was observed that there were erosion cuts on the
inner dike wall of the lagoon. -
Erosion on the dike wall of the lagoon is a violation of your Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan, and subsequent infractions may result in a Notice of Violation and include a
civil penalty. The erosion cuts on the lagoon dike wall should be filled with a suitable clay
material and revegetated with an appropriate cover. In addition, the grassed waterway by the farm
road should be graded and revegetated to ensure no ponding or runoff occurs during waste
application. Erosion in the storm water diversion adjacent to the lagoon should be repaired. We
suggest that you contact your service company, local NRCS office, or Soil and Water District
office for any assistance they may be able to provide to correct these situations.
To remain a deemed permitted facility, you must notify this office in writing within seven
(7) days of the receipt of this notice, what actions will be taken to comply with your waste
management plan_ Failure to do so may result in the facility losing it's deemed permitted status,
requiring it to obtain an individual non discharge permit.
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Billy Kilpatrick
June 3, 1998
Page 2
Please be aware it is a violation of North Carolina General Statutes to discharge wastewater
to the surface waters of the State without a permit. The Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 per day per
violation.
When the required corrective actions are complete, you must notify this off -ice in writing
at the address below. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call David
Holsinger or Brian Wrenn at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
Brian L. Wrenn
Environmental Specialist
cc: Harold Jones, County Soil and Water Conservation
Sandra Weitzel, NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation
- Don Butler, Carroll's Foods, Inc.
Operations Branch
Wilmington Files
S. IWQSIBRUATADEF981D UPLIN13l-97-2.DEF

RECE�
D
JUN1 0 1988
6-6-98
Brian Wrenn
Environmental Specialist
NCDept. Environment and
Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
Dear Mr. Wrenn,
I received your letter concerning my inspection on 5-29-98. Please allow me 6-8
weeks to make the necessary repairs to the lagoon dike, grass waterways, and storm
drains. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
Billy Kilpatri
Facility Num r:31-97
Duplin County

200"4j03 09:30 BILLY KILPATRICK 9102961026 >> 9103502004
P vi
JL

r, FCWM CROP-1
CROP YIELD RECORD
0
0
N
O
Ln
m
m
cn
w
N
m
w
m
N
O
.c
Y
U_
OC
r
d
a
Y
r
cI1
N
01•
O
m
v
o.
C6
0
0
N
Farm Owne . e FadAty Number-
Opomtor
Date
mmddMeg
FleldlPug IQ
Crap
Yield
of Bushels
Sale Size
Icable
FlakWul Sine
ed =051
'Yield per Acre
or Bwh UAc
GprN
89 • (ofil .. y9�
3 7Srb`� a09
�� rr era
3a4P
f9gLow
a� !
3, !
309►�
,��
(3) Y[eld/Aa a = (1) Yield divided by (2) Flei&ghA Siva. (3)-(1 u(2}

20M04-G3 0921 BILLY KILPATRICK 9102961826 >> 9103502004
P 2/3
Appendix 1. Lagoon Sludge Survey Form
A. Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number J 3 f1 ` '? J7
S. Lagoon Identification % --CIA
C. Pertton(s) Taking Measurements Ll �'/%' . t f{f '
D. Date of Meancernents 10 �� ^4P
F.. Methods/Devices Used for Meanto meat of
4. Distartee from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer:
A tiVIftN 5 1 4 L A .- G-r&n
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if snaking a diroot mcasuromen with "core sampler":
r J Ad
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): acres)
(Draw a sketch of the lagoon on a separate sheet, list dimensions, and calculate surface area.)
0. Estimate number of sampling points:
a. Less than 1.33 acres: Use 8 is
b. if more than 1.33 acres, acres x 6 with maximum of 24.
(Using sketch and dinwrisions, develap a unifotnr Vid that has the same number of intersections as the
estimated number of samptin points heeded Number the itdermet6n points oo tde lagoon grid so that data
rt corded at each can be easily matched,)
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Sheet" (Appendix 2).
I. At the time of the sludge survey, also measure tho distance from the Maximum Liquid Level ��
to the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gauge pole); _ •
i. Determine the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the \iinitnum Liquid Level '
(use lagoon management plan or other lagoon records):
K. Calculate the distance from the present liquid surface level to the Minimum Liquid Level � t
([tent 1 minus Item 1, assuming the prrseat liquid level is below the Maximum Liquid Level):
L. Record firm die Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points : +03
M. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the top of the sludge layer (average for all the tnca5urentent points):
N. Record f m the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer: Jff
0. Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treaimcnt Zone (Item M minus heist 1Q: 4
(Note: If Item 0 is less than 4 feet, a sludge rernml one ut hadon plan may be required by
N.C. DWQ. Set: yaw specific permit or contact ntu'D for more information.)
P. Proceed to the Sludge Volume Worksheet if you desire to calculate sludge volume for a recungular-
shaped lagoon with urdform side slopes.
Completed by ,: Date: 10•,2� - D
1%
Print Name icnature
14

2008 &04-W 09:21 BILLY KILPATRICK 9102961026 >> 9103502004 p 3/3
Appendix Z. Sludge Survey Data Sheet*
Lagoon Idenfiftation: ' Q
Sludge Survey Data Sheet , � 7
Completed by: , Date: 10 —ZG 427
Print Name Signature
• } r • r'
••
layer
®�
O
• d r cbm�urj mial bgdg—wAga a Amh aftacliedt
shik{,$1my Dow Sheet
See Apper dh 4 for conversion from Inch¢a !a twiths ot'a foou
15

.
P. 01
TRANSACTION REPORT
APR-03-2008 THU 09:13 AM
FOR: NCDENR
9103502004
�c
RECEIVE
DATE START SENDER
RX TIME PAGES TYPE
NOTE M# DP
APR-03 09:12 AM BILLY KILPATRICK
37" 3 FAX RX
OK
�
�c

Michael F. Easley, Governor
o� O`aWA
rFRQG
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 1, 2007
William R Kilpatrick "�CEIVEb
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
463 Routledge St SUN 2 Z007
Kenansville, NC 28349 Y•:
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310097
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Duplin County
Dear William R Kilpatrick:
In accordance with your application• received on 20-Feb-07, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to William R Kilpatrick, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Billy Kilpatrick Farm, located in Duplin County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 4320 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition III.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay
careful attention to the record kegping and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: wwwmcwateroualitv.om Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recyded110% Post Consumer Paper
I'NAhCarolina
atura!!rf
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed. r
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon, abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .011-1(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection staff may be reached at 910-395-3900. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at (919) 733-
3221.
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County Health Department
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AW S310097

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number 3 + Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
-- - - - O Other Agency t0000�
Type of Visit )e) Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival
Time: ; l0 Departure Time: 'Q ounty: �C/��L Region:
Farm Name: ��Lt/ 7� �P��Z�h _i�Lr>� Owner Email:
Owner Name: �2�L �r _ L-_z- Loa zgzg4 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: ,��y L4O?Rra7�- Integrator: _ �( l/ - 64Wc-4,J
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = 0 = f = Longitude: = ° = 4 = Ai
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
i ❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer -
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
ZO
El Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
1
❑ Dairy Heifer
E3Dry Cow
1
❑ Non-Dairy1
3
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
Plumber of Structures: IT
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
El Yes '0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑NA
[I NE
[I Yes [I No
❑ Yes�No
El NA
El NE
ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection 4
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: #/
Spillway?: NO
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): :50
❑ Yes )6No
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA Cl NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Ann ication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes y
No ❑ NA ElNE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)-
13. Soil type(s) �� /✓p - -
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes e No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
2J ._/tJfA0 5 7P7C�, -7N4.. yF
-02 /57&m
- Akfo o 0--54 1 pplZ0a 77<C - �.
Reviewer/Inspector Name f. Phone:01
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 12.08/ 4 Continued

Facility Number: 3 Date of Inspection
Required Records _&_Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check 0yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists 2'6esign El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below, Oyes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ,Stocking Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ,2TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
,0Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes )KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes RTNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
PrNE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes Nob NA
❑ NE
Additional D`rraawings:/f
jComments �and/or
�
/[Tit / "[ivs4^% '1 /� ��J it��n% Q% hyV L/t/ /O �/✓' z���� �dry�/]
2f,f) Now
A(
S
G,09-7�
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Division of Water Quality 11
Facility Number Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
__ _ _ i___ O Other Agency L.O�
Type of Visit f D Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit X Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: /O�j Arrival Time: �` p Departure Time: /,' /IQ County: �" Region: L
Farm Name: LG `L fjZ4�A7/1 Zef:lz !�_ Owner Email:
Owner Name: AZZ�✓ l 1 ZL77�K Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: / Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: z�L1 ZGP�4i�ZC' K Integrator: , ,/" —6,eca �
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 c=` = i4 Longitude: 0 o a S=
64
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Dischary-es & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes A No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes /ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number• — 4 . Date of Inspection I O
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: AJO
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z�
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes j[J No
ElNA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
El NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
El Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
El Yes
,�/
ld No
El NA
El NE
maintenance/improvement?
T
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[9'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ FAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) , l�r H86*J5
13. Soil type(s)
r1
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
No
❑ Yes pr
ElNA
[-INE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes /EfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
�o� rii,a L�r�FzCrLzsts �rrr� n0205, •
23) i4RzG-/cti -rr,n.j iota/nP � s R�n1 �F„p , �cJiv4lZ 05
C2f cd'+JG'��C--
lG �rn 6u;P&i;, C&Z6,eA-7z6,-) W- C 95 yyOn1F //O - CO2A a�'=
Reviewer/Inspector Name Idf j- rf i Phone: y10 - qq& -'7Z6µ
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 11101'4— Date: _V/ LO�O
tP
Page 2 of
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ZYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP Checklists ❑Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes JKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 9Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
�z Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ONE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes IZJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
io
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
El NA
El NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
///X
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
T
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number `7 ' i County 1 J &%7l I �.
Facility Nam .(as,shawn on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) = j • fp.P+_c-k
Opmwr-in Charge for this. Facility _ $� Cemfica on # % 9Ga5
Laud appIk ation of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occtsrrod during the past cWeadar year ✓� YES
NO. If NO,, skip Pat# -I and Part 11 and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste was � but not
land applied, please allwb an explanation on how the animal waste was handled. ��' ��' Ij%�' �
i
ManagwncW
Part I : Fscrtit`► Ini"or,�nation•.. - � .MAR 0 2 LU��
1. Toted nwaber ofapplication Fields. ❑ or Pulls R please oracle the appnpriate box�).in the Certified Animal ane
Plan (CAWMP): I Tc%W Useable Acres spptov Y�
t .�tli�y�r� .�� � '•_ �=Talst'A"aes its �as� was app%d , k.-�.
3. Total pexutds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)_ allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and the
p-=& =
5. Estimated'amount of total umurre,-litter and process-wastewaW sold or given to other persons and taken off site
r
" *c year l7 ions ❑ or gallons 0 (please check the appropriate box)
b. Annual average nundw of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
9. Largast and snmallew nw nber of anmWs by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year:
Smallest In #'d'
("these numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals at the
P�IIt _Fasiti��s=
IF TME MY SIAXEMPIT BELOW IS 'NO". PLEASE MOM2E N
&U�QN M 10 MM THE FA I T MP A ,MffLN
IANCE" EXPLAIMCgUEUM AMM JAMN QR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
I . Only animal waste Sawrated at tills facility was applied to the permitted sites durirng U-Tes ❑ No
tine past calendar year.
2. The facility`was-operated in such away that there was no direct runoff ofwaste from @-Yes © Nc
the f>;ci�liiy'(�iuding the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and'ft application sites) dungg.dw past calendar year.
AFACF 3-14-03

Year
''ire iiw- no ftedwird•violabon inlagoons or storage ponds 4 this'f Wili3y dur* ©. Yes �Io
the'past�r�l�ar-year. ,
" {lam y .
5. TheFe Was aa"PAN 1i�ation to an fields or at this than the = ; 8! Y�,sJ ❑. No app . y, craps facility ll�r .
kvds s ificd:ia hds facility's CAWN P,during the past calendar year^ _
5.:. All.land:applicatian egai .was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year. [ Yes ❑ No
7 .. Sludge acc tmufation4n all'lagoons did not,6wwd the vohme for v hWch the =v6
VYes No
iiesRgnWor,r�s;edh lagoons mininnurin��t volume to less th hlume
for wlache lagoon was designed.
tr
�aPY�.af tl���Annua#�Siudge Survey Form #or -this facility is attached to this C�a�fi�atmn �es`� �� F. No =
i.. -,i � � s.:.�-C��' ���'=���-rif'� ' -`.�'` •s - "'�rtA`iS :a..' '�''� "�5i.� {'c;, �a���"�.'mot .+. tic
.Q A .�! laQ .rr.r,.l.;..rfinesaw�'i,n:oarli �i�ri'r�rrivino l�cbryetrrrlryrmc tlu. .. - _ fYrV�e t"is Nis
10- Snd pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year? Q' Yes ❑ No
11. All requiredam"oonpand*itorij* an�r�erporptging was perforn� in accordance with the facility's Vies -,.❑ No
in -the were lied with IfYes - C3:c No _ .i2..:All-�operatioas-and tceancerequs pemut� oomp during
the past r ;year or; su file sass of ar;deviatiori, prior su#horization was received
V ; frorhtlin� of Water. Quahiy.
13 Craps as speed m theCAWMP were maintained during the past calendar, year on all .r Yes I7 No
sites" raceiveng.aairirai Waste ark the corps gnrvvn were rernaval in accordance with -
the, Ipernut. -
14. -All-buffer require ne s as specified'on the permit,and the CAWW for this facility _were .❑ "No
maiuziained daring each application of animal waste during file past calendar year.
y "I fy uatler,pezty of law that ydns doc�unt.: and all;attadunertts were Preparedeuzder my drron o; supervision in
�3`'F`s�r`�__��-=rL._-�`�► �`_`--:�,.... �:J:i�''�.......:�.d rt..r?.:• ...1.i'.a.i'_��.......sl�� - e..1�-.:...�1.�.�..3:..ti..l....a..'�L...:-+/'-'

or
Arm Wei
� yIry d gudp bW direct. a�x+e s+r�pier':
pnimm mmb&N ibe.._ `
be
low
. a'.FfalO{._ +%r Fri' i y.-•4.., � -
€: do gfmbmne fmm the
._ eE
t"
i '- `�" si. sSTiY - —. _` � s t • rm, r- : 71� �P. � Ef}. 4-..y Litt. �.f ! '17�M�3
`- `` .- . M:`ii■�tt'�iir��tvey� � -
-7-
dit n a titclus iise_se
P. Pwaed to d1e UaCkyo Volume WmkshW if fw a
TO
- :,�' 9
AMN
. _ Jc Y •�` 11. fie- i V VY _ i' 4 - ..ii � - ' A �i r r ,.L:�1 " r
--i- of x, Eh2� ZT :� `�3'=.�.'� �..• � a5.`.zm , sicW��.
Liiy past 4a ,wr

L/1RF,CE1VF,D
S E P 13 2004
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
BY:
Facility Number: [L:l-97 County: Duplin
Facility Name: Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Certified Operator Name: Billy Kilpatrick Operator Number:
19659
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
1
N
12.5
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Boiume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWO prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 0911012004
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Phone: [phone]
Date: 09/10/2004

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): Kil atrick
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 12.51 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.5 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 7.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 128048.25 ft2
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3 558717 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 583200 ft3
h. current herd # 3fi00 certified herd # 4320
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 daystline f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 07/13/2004
m. ((fines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
486000 ft'
0 ft3
1033052 ft3
1893751 gallons
2.20 Ibs/1000 gal.
5395.4 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121100

Ill. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR./24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure ID: Kilpatrick
line m =
5395.4 lb PAN
2. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5. Structure 1D:
line m =
lb PAN
6. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines 1 +2+3+4+5+6= 6395.4 lb PAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(Ib/acre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
lu. application window'
3186
10
Wheat
6.93
104.00
720.7
Sept - April
3186
11
Wheat
6.64
104.00
690.6
Sept - April
3186
12
Wheat
7.52
104.00
782.1
Sept -April
3186
13
Wheat
7.52
104.00
782.1
Sept -April
3186
14
Wheat
3.94
104.00
409.8
Sept - April
3186
15
Wheat
3.22
104.00
334.9
Sept - ril
3186
16
Wheat
6.78
106.00
718.7
Sept - ril
3186
17
Wheat
6.30
106.00
667.8
Sept -April
3186
18
Wheat
6.30
106.00
667.8
Sept - ril
3186
19
Wheat
6.78
106.00
718.7
Sept -April
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column Q = 6493.0 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 5395.4 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section Ill) = 6493.0 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -1098 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc_ For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

Facility Number j
Date of Visit: Tune:
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
01permitted dCerfified 0 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: gLw. �C �-� ._ �► • _ county: D () �_...._............_ ..�....
Owner Name:
.._ _ .. .._ .__ .._... 'Phone No:
_Mailing Address:..__
Facility Contact: --- --Title: _.. Phone No: . • � _,_ ,
Onsite Representative: _ .'! Z *� iU -- - - -•• Integrator.
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • " Longitude • 4 �u
Swine
Y , .Cattle `
Wtan to Feeder
Layer
Feeder to Finish
,
Non -Layer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
1; + y - Togo
7
Gilts
Boars
t_
IME`.1'T�1�r�trl
--
F.r✓_ w Z A x_
Number a[.istgoons �.• ;� �= ��
Discharges & Stream Impacts -
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) []Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage). less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): D
12112103 Conrnued

FacilityNumber: ME 9=-j Date of Inspection
•5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maimtenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancefunprovement?
9. Do any strictures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/unprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload [IFrozen Ground ElCopper and/or Zinc
ap
12. Crop type CiSW
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
VYe
s ❑No
s ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.
7, Yf.Lu s E 3 Ha G ID AM) mope- kJ<-E pS
35,) 1 " R.A4M*:Ac 1. s►.15p 6C�-Z o,J >u tr � j
sD et b6,J(---.
❑ Feld Copy ❑ Final Notes
g,)oN 9/3l09 (.,EUEt. WA5 2-q ipcf s ac.c.e"x@J& -Pv 6t_t� SGtrIPG , o- A -PRY
-T(_ 4� S!l cc'.. oIJ 11%bla c tAmc Our stlb ek-Sle'T' mpnAvER ry 41004e5 ,o -NAi
Q_Aomo& 5lizsraC-fl k'", ?UV-,A9S:0a Eu6n1TS s+j 4 f to t g f 1%, gitit) 9jtt..! ANr) -tjn'aq
Ta GE-t- �a 21" Atc6t�.o G '1`a NEW SE'TR'�U� i Et,N PEG Co,/tb '6UT
ANp FrL c-P-ur se i�1�G-► ASAP, (bsk64_9 W LOW ?ar,a`c df
Ds.'V Ot"At_ girt + 4�� fbr%- TOTAL of G.y-coicMdS. FAewr ,&(L RAS
3' S ORJ 5a`�E3EA�3 Ssa�,�c Gi31e,1 . NoTz(l VWQ 1JHEr' i�6A11 t�UE-�
GAvGy; =►s, �cily� 3a5 3°1a Za z Tv t,�„ v►t= aLyr A>Jli �fE�fi�';
T
Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: `31 0
Continued
A"A.&/w

Facility Number: 31— Date of Inspection t3
' Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Oe/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewf inspection with on -sire representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need im vement? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Stocking Form [I Crop Yield Form ❑Rainfall Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes- ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [) No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[l`Yes ❑ No
12112103

Type of Visit AOompliance inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit WRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: T'une: I--0
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
PermittedCertified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ._.____._...,.....
Farm Name: ..... __.Bau::.` ........K ?A 1.. Qk.......f:�amq.--------•-- County:......_ 5.�'p ..... ___ . ... . _....
Owner Name: __ ._ ...... -Phone No: .... ............. ... . ................ .....—
MadingAddress:.. . ...... ................ ....................... ...... ..................... ............... ...... _. _. _._ __...._ .... ._.. ....... ......
Facility Contact: .................... ,.... ........ Title:._..... - ---- .............. Phone No:
Onsite Representative:... t' 1.. ........Integrator:--.-.--C101 .......................................
Certified Operator:... _._ ....._....._._ .....__...... ......................... Operator Certification Number:........... .
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 4 " Longitude • 4 't
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 2jeNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes' ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:.......... J... _............ ........................... .......................
Freeboard (inches): ;Z'
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ No
No
To
❑ Yes
�Fo
Structure 6
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 3 1 — Z9 Date of inspection
5 f Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)'
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancerimprovement? ❑ Yes ! N
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes VN
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes191
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type C150
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes Z
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
Odor Ivsues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes 040"
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? /
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes d
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, El Yes yNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes No
Air Quality representative immediately.
ECommentsro answers
der-o.0and/or any ecom endattons or any rither comments. _ x=:
(gse
se dlra nf fairiltty to better expElam s*b"i!on {use'addmona! pages as necessary) Field Copy O Final Notes
m
(RfcESo Aft K4+5 REet-� ?.ECoti PE 9 �R a�EfZL-`4'.
]'TWV:3.06, (-CLM NEcvS �d KEPT drzzN �CCoRDS.
C_R0f> `lrC-t.o �OM AS OCt i) TO fit= kjPD0\ [<J ,
Tos pecTrIdtJ P F-rE�. 1 I.�CEOS to
T
_:""�'�_.,.,.'E,',,,,,
Reviewer/Inspector Name...�-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: d5' Oq
12112103 1 Continued

Facility Number. _ Date of .Inspection
r'
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 2rNo
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? /
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes �No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 2 No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes No/
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑yes ❑o
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 0 Rio
N'PDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDF_S Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) 94res ❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Rj`No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes 7No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? E❑ Yeses El No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. es ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall EJ mspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

Michael F. to„Gy,
William G. Ross Jr., Secre
•y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resou
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. mire
Division of Water Qu
August 25, 2003
Billy Kilpatrick_
463 Routledgi St.
,Kenansville, NC 28349
Subject. Rescission of Notice of Violation I
Issuance of Notice of Deficiency
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Facility # 31-97
Duplin County
Dear Billy Ki trick:
Thank you for your recent submittal of the information requested in our letter dated April 15,
2003. We grpatly appreciate the effort that you made in compiling this information and sending
it to our Wilrimington Regional Office by the date required. We also appreciate the fact that you
reported the p�pblern with high freeboard to our staff as required by your permit and worked with
our staff to niarl ge the problem once it occurred.
Upon review and consideration 'of the information submitted, the Wilmington Regional Office has
determined that rio further compliance/enforcement actions will be taken by the Division for
Oiesq high freebpards.
Also; "based on your actions to properly operate your facility, the Division of Water Quality
hereby'rescinds-the Notice of Violation that was issued to you on April 15, 2003 and replaces it
with this Notice of Deficiency.
In the'future;'please continue to evaluate ways to maintain freeboard levels in the required range..
These methods include, but are not limited to, water conservation practices, adding additional
application sits, updating your cropping systems, adding additional and/or more flexible
application equipment, and maintaining the lagoon levels at the lowest allowable and appropriate
levels.through64t the year. Our staff looks forward to continuing to work with you and your .
Technical Specialist to evaluate and implement any needed changes to your system.
Customer Servfce: Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location:
1 80062377748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax, [phone] 512 N. S-'
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleir, '
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled 1 10% post -consumer paper
http:Nh2o.enr.s1tate, nc. us

Inadequate Freeboard
Billy Kilpatrick
August 25, 2003
Page 2
Thank you again for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact=the staff of our Wilmington Regional Office at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
CC: Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown, LLC
Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Patrick Fussell, DS WC
V mingto Files 3gF•RA
Central Firs

o�aF wa rFR pG
Michael F. Easley
Governor
April 16, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Billy Kilpatrick
463 Routledge St.
Kenansville NC 28349
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Request for Information
Inadequate Freeboard
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
#31-97
Duplin County
Dear Sir or Madam:
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek. P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
On March 21, 2003, a representative of your animal operation informed the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) that there was inadequate freeboard in the lagoon(s) serving this facility.
This lack of adequate freeboard is in non-compliance with the Certificate of Coverage
issued to this facility on December 7, 1998. In addition to this Notice of Violation (NOV), this
non-compliance is subject to an appropriate enforcement action by DWQ. This action can
consist of one or more of the following: a civil or criminal enforcement action; an injunction;
and/or a requirement to apply for coverage under an individual permit. The action chosen will
be based on complete evaluation of all factors that resulted in the inadequate freeboard; the
actions taken to restore the needed freeboard; and the actions being proposed to prevent the
problem from reoccurring.
To assist us in our review, please provide the Wilmington Regional Office with an
evaluation of the reasons for the freeboard violation(s) and a strategy to prevent future freeboard
violation(s). This evaluation and strategy must include but is not limited to the following:
Current Freeboard level(s)
Freeboard level records in the lagoon(s) for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
Spraying records for the past.12 months up to the date of submittal
NCDENR
Customer Service. Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 1006 past -consumer paper
ht1p✓/h2o.enr.state.nc. us

Inadequate Freeboard
Page 2
Rainfall records for the past 12 months for this site up to the date of submittal (if
available)
Cropping system and PAN specified in the CAWMP. If the cropping system was not in
compliance with the facility's CAWMP, provide details of the cropping system in place
for the past 12 months.
A summary of actions taken to restore the needed freeboard in the lagoon(s) including but
not limited to removal of animals from the site, delay of restocking of animals, pumping
and hauling waste to another site (specify site), securing additional irrigation equipment,
and securing additional spray sites.
A description of water conservation measures in use at the facility and the date(s)
installed.
If the lagoon level(s) are still in violation of the facility's CAWMP and Permit, provide
an updated Plan of Action as to how the facility will return to compliance.
Provide a detailed description of the actions taken or proposed to be taken to insure that
there are no further freeboard violations at this facility.
This information must be received by the Wilmington Regional Office at the following
address no later than 10 days following receipt of this letter.
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-2845
Once this information is received and evaluated by the DWQ staff, a determination will
be made as to the appropriate compliance/enforcement actions to be taken. Each case will be
evaluated on its own merit. The efforts by the owner/producer to notify DWQ of the problem,.
efforts made to resolve the problem once identified, and efforts proposed to prevent future
problems will be positive factors in this determination.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you either the responsibility or
liability for this non-compliance or future cases of non-compliance. If you have any questions
regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact our Wilmington Regional Office Staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
/Alan. Klimek, .E.
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Central Files

Type of Visit P Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit j6Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facilitv Number [late of Visit:
VPermitted © Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered
Farm Name: ZLL%LPRTQ�� K ��Riy�
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
OnsitevRepresentative: J�� t zl-pfET K
Time:
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County:
Phone No:
I ntegrator:
Phone No. -
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 0' C K Longitude a . 0
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drain
Holding on f Sohd Traps '.W" E3 No Liquid Waste
Discharges & Stream impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
} Spray Field Area
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes 9fNo
❑ Yes ONO
Structure 6
Continued

Z 312 634 930
US Postal Service
Receipt for Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided.
Do not use for International Mail See reverse
Sent to.
V
& Kum
P Oloo, State, & ZIP
Postage
$ �.
Certified Fee
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
u)
rn
Retum R to
R
�42
Address
T FOk
P r Date
a

Facility Number- —q Date of Inspection
5. Are there anv immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes �No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8.: Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Analication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes X,No
11. Is there evidence of over application El Excessive Ponding El PAN ElHvdraulic Overload El Yes XNo
12. Crop type I�OK �� ��_LJ S WHEAT
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17- Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19_ Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to,notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes L�' No
❑ Yes �gNo
_
El Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes X
No
❑ Yes I No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
A No
VNo
X. �No
No
No
�No
XNo
XNo
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
_. rt
Comments (refer to questiosi #) Esphiin airy YES;answers arxdlor any ieiontmendahons or anv:other comments:
Use drawings of 1261 y to better explain sltuattvns ruse additional. pages as necessary) Field Copv��❑ Final Notes )
_
Reviewer/Inspector Name _ 7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes In No
❑ Yes )z No
❑ Yes Yf'No
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
glAddltion-alCommentsr8nd/6r`Drawln's.:_.-
Re-Mm(*"1EOO �EEV�iJG �RF S NRa��D ��RRNrs
OVF t 5�pR��
Fo(C,rP--r fo0- �bTe-
-T-0
:SF
Au,), Pumip LF
52-
1-/0 mGa, PPi2a�
05103101

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
BILLY KILPAMCK
PO Box 94
KENANSVILLE NC 28349
Dear Billy Kilpatrick:
DlI VLAUI
is;
A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT of
ENVIRONMENT AND NAxuRAL RESOURCES
March 5, 2002
Subject: Notice of Violation and Revocation for Nonpayment
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Permit Number: AWS310097
Duplin County
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.10G, all anima] operations who receive an animal
waste management system permit will be charged in each year of the term an annual permit fee. Annual permit fees are
billed following the issuance of the permit and then annually thereafter on the anniversary of that date. Your animal waste
management system permit was issued on 12/711998.
Your annual permit fee for the period of 12/7/2001 - 12/6/2002 is $150.00. Your payment was due 2/14/2002.
Because this fee was not fully paid within 30 days after being billed, this letter initiates action to revoke the subject permit,
pursuant to 15 NCAC 2H .0205 (c) (4). and G.S. 143-215.1 (b) (3).
Effective 60 days from receipt of this notice, the subject permit is hereby revoked unless the required Annual
Animal Waste Management System Permit fee for your animal operation is received within that time. Operation of an
animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215. I and is
subject to the assessment of a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per day. Your payment should be sent to:
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Budget Office
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you have any questions, please contact Fran McPherson at [phone] ext. 210.
cc: Non -Discharge Branch Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Health Department
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper

JU4 T iFiCA i ION & DOCUMENTATION FDn/MANDA i DRY VVA DET_RIAINA }pN
4 S T_ V O e G tl c :!illy NUr;l)ar��� = S�t p flop 15 fiag7es'7 Tt)r z V:�ecLcl.?ie
Fa; �;s Name:_ �,�� �� -��--; �_� acre netermination due tD iaifur a o;
pri-Site r epresenthtive: C h ;-.� - Part If eligibility items)r1 : ? r`-3 c
Insoector[Reviewerls Name:
Date of site visit-
____= Operation not. required fo secure WA
determination a# this time based on
exemption E1 E2 :_3 E4
Date of most recent WUf : Opar3fiOn peoded for wet able acre
- - — determination based on F'1 p2 :3
Annual ;arm SPAN CiefiCit �:� `t' i?DUnt'� ,1.cr.,�3 �tr� �, IPA
Ii rc igation sys ern(S) - Circle 1 haTd-hose Ubev ho I CaiT PI&OL System; I 11nea.='DVn Sy5L= I, 117
4. SttionaTy Spnnk-)er system wlpecicaneni pipe; o_ stationary spr7nkJer system wiportaDia pipe;
D. staI ovary gun system wipermanett pip--; /. 5-1=1Dr-ary gun Sv-ste-m wipoilabi DID W '-A
-. ; i I. WA Determination Exemptiorm (IiicibiiihLy iaBure, Ya; i 11, .overrides Par: I exemption-)
i "�d�nlinie Iri gabon design, including map depiudng wetable aCi--S, is CWT' Di to
and signed by an l or PE_
E92 Adequate D, and 7jD, irrigation operating parameter sheets, inciuciin❑ map
c_piciing wetable.a :res, is complete and signed by an for PE_
=3 Adequate D, 7mgabon.DDaiffiJng paiaTnetEr sneer, induding neap DeDlcunq
Wave amen is complete and signed by a WUF:I.
-. 75°a Wile exemption as verified in Part W. (ND 7 a °b exemption cannot be
apniied iD :aTms that til the eiigibiiiiy.:i-iezdsi -in ?art.11. Complete -:�iiaibiiity
t:�ecitiist,�ar II- � � ;? ; 3,.beior= ctampiezinD cprrtpl��iionai:;..abi= in mar lil)..
'�r;� i` "if - % b,: tiule : =iijLb-ifet' CilaMstand.a =urner tafici 1 &, .WA e'ieiinir, bor,
Jet' ~�.� d a e`c i a �:
R quir rn nts. WA-� rknedlRn:regll[Te, b ..a s�-Dp..r3tion'eai.sr�n�n;�trl. iitiibiiiiy
repotmerrs itstedifeiorv: - - -
aT7�n�Y-
7fYlL�is�3�::.�7rCIIrIC ?o.;3iTI7':V 1a�1WG 1Ta3.*"a2I:.'ffTi�^�7r��]L`'=s_
lincf a:,ll?i7dCi�,-Dr i3i.1K {Ji "Ii1TDiliia`ils7i71ci�a*J_
� DbviDLs�feld-iimi�iiDr:s�(nuTr�mps�aitLi�.�Ilur�=psi=IIu�
L}I1TrerlSetGi3,.it�%i�no=,T..}r �:.°n�-�"3taf�C.rS3�.3'.��T'IiiTf-_�-,�T1I1 �✓.'�'1�iiti�� =tn :lllDTaS�' _ '
5c`FiCll, 1Trapliiaril'�icczT�'��Dmods�`�fafos:I��SZT'caTi���,F?j TC3i33Vai�T".��i_1� Zl�arl
! Mpninkiers)
Wk Drequired Lie: a'.� _CAW e�ILSTf?it ;5?'S _Creme -in eXCess
c /5ic Di"Ina res?eC:'IIV_ ?al�f'] iuwi ..CcvaCly as nQ%ed In.iabie in , i i M.

Division of Water Qnahty
.Division of Soil and Water Conservation
P
0 Other Agency
[Type of Visit X} Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit '0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Bate of Visit
*Permitted 13 Certified Q Conditionally Certified 0 Registered
ll �
Farm Name: .............� I..r�.GF..................................................
Owner Name:
Facility Contact: .....
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: ,1r!�-.Q„y ,.
Title:
—a� Tine: 00O Printed on: 10/26/2000
NNot Operational Q Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:D.
County: \� h
......... Phone No:.......................................................................................
Phone No:
.................................................................................... ..........................
Integrator:.....1
Certified Operator: ................................................... ......................................... ................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
T
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude �• �� ���
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer I 1 ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish �LG JE1 Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts 1EE
❑ Boars ATotal SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream I_mpacty
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
WNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance ratan -made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated now in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ZNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
W No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes
J6No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure ; Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:...................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 04 1
5/00
Continued
on back

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
5_ Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? %6'4
xcessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type �' UY h f t..�h� uC_i,_V
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
ReQuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes JKNo
❑ Yes )�No
KYes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
J
XYes
❑ No
❑ Yes
[�fNo
❑ Yes
16 No
❑ Yes f 'No .
❑ Yes R(No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes XNo
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes O No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes )J No
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes 9No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes fii"No
10 yiolal�itjris:ei- il�fcienr`ies wgre !nQ#ed al>triOg this:vpsitt • Yoit ViOtee0iye 06 €pttb . .
cories deice about thhs visit'
W .
Comments (refer to question #)Explati aay YES answers and/or any recommendations or aay other commeuta=,
Use davvigs of faicility to Better explaw sitnations. (else additional. pages as` necessy} Y;H` '=
_ — ..
- -
' s ape i4. t. `1 0�� �5 %.a�,xe.r �-• t%r �-, r�e �a� t-.. `
5�cde, s�� I l�^••� ECG �'3�-�es� a�►.--s�r� M�riT2� � -�- s�-+-�..� tvit�-� U�tZ�T .
"�5
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: — �,0— G" 5/00

Facility Number: 1 Date of Inspection Q
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes XNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 4 No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ,KYes NA�k—
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes KNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? XYes ❑ No
lAdditionaMominents an or rawrngs:
J
5/00

_ r] Division of Soil and=Water Conservatton Operation Review
_r
= E. E.Division of Soil and WaternConservanon;� Cpinplfance Itispeetion w _ t
Division of Water-Qualtty TCompliance inspection
-,
ClOther Agency - Uperaon=Review ,
- Y
r
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO i
I Facility Number r]
'T" I
Follow-t►o of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection
24 hr. (hh:mm)
[Permitted © Certified E] Conditionally Certified [3 Registered JE3 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..........•,.
Farm Name: J �/ ...... l..f Y` County .,.......
_ -. LI.jj- p... I L ..... - tIA n...........................
OwnerName:............... ....� .�.......-_...........-. Phone No:.............................---......--...............................................
FacilityContact:....................................../...-........................-_.......... Title:...I1.h!.!. I......-..........-_....... ................. Phone No:....--....... --...................................
MailingAddress: ....................................................................................................................................._................... .......... I........ ........ I........
Onsite Representative:.... SAi .Zl .� rr ..... Integrator: .......... ef/t'>'�� f ...........
Certified Operator- ----------- ------ ---. . ................./ .. Operator Certification Number:,,,,,.,,.,,,,
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude �• �° 0°L
Design Current - . Design , , Current- Design Cii. refit ,
'Swine Capacity Population Poultry _ .Capacity -.Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
�Number'o€,Lagoons © ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray F�etd Ares
Holdtng;Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
h. If discharge is ohserved, did it reach Water Of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
�rt
Freeboard (inches): ..............
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
-71ZA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
j .
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
❑ Yes KNo
Continued on back
3/23/99

Facility Number: ?J I — G� Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum Iiquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
I2. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0: 10 yiQlatioris or d�#icie di ,9 •were itgted OXW ig �bis:visit; • ;Y:oii ;wiil•t&4eiye iit? furtht • : -
corresporideii& ab' 'f this visit: ::: '
tts'(refer'to•question'#) Explaiirairy'YES answers
O'Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes *0
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes 7 N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes O
❑ Yes f�N10
❑ Yes j�'No
El Yes 'JKN` o
❑ Yes %No
KYes ❑ No
[]Yes RNo
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes CirNo
-%
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ;<No
❑ Yes tINo
r J 'r i5 wei-ki W;,7w ` st t, Di s4v al' Fi) I
y tnS�rL v:
IAA r/ N.D_y%\1 1i�' A 1A l!A Aft12,1 44-. J- 1A/, AO.
I Reviewer/Inspector Name 0
Y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: A-4— A A ,1�� Date: �' 2062--)

Facility Number: 7J — G� Date of Itrspection
'Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below [:]Yes [�No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? ' \
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes KNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes )b No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes N0
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes kNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes krNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes .JRNo
Additional Comments an.. , or e• >rarvtngs:,,
l K-�f.� ems' - &1- �- 4,4 YkIr. 4l�.
Oor'� �e .
4s- r - ,.... '0 '' a-F rs l-s+ o J
P.
Ovrtas
Of
,sue; ;&t 11 .�- '►+ � w.o (� 'tea- �- copvr
541

Revised April 20, 1999
4
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number 9 r - " -
Farm Name: s rWt_.
On -Site Representative: &t_N
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: > rau�r-
Date of site visit: R�16 9a
Date of most recent WUP:
Annual farm PAN deficit: 1) 7 pounds
Operation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part // eligibility item(s) . F1 F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time bas on
-exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Operation pended for we acre
determination based on P1 P2 P3
Irrigation System(s) - circle hard -hose traveler; 2.'center-pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary -gun system,wlpermanent pipe;, 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D21D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres,. is complete and signed by an. I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
Z75% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART 11. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails -one of thezligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in overapplication of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years Hof irrigation-Tecords. .
F2 . Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to -deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or.25% of total acreage identified -in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres fortravelersvr less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number 31 -L7---
Part III. Field by Field Determination
of
75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'.2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
'
FIELD
%
COMMENTS'
•53
ia
-4�
I
I
r
3.8
`E4
1 P -J dr
IS
i
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBERS - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS'- back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres -and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & .1998) of irrigation records,cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in -the comment section and must be -accessible
by irrigation system.
Part IV. Pending WA Determinations
P1 Plan lacks following information:
P2 Plan revision may satisfy 75% rule.based on adequate overall PAN deficit and by
adjusting all field acreage to below 75% use rate
P3 Other (ielin process of installing new irrigation system):

Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ..........a...'................ ............. ....................... ................................... ................................... ..
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
E3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation Operation Review
_.
.. 13Division of Soil and,Water Conservation �Compliaace Inspection s
nof aterQty` ecoaisioWm
Other Agency ; Opei ation-Revie�y
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow -tip of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection B 6
Time of Inspection / : 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted Xcertified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Q Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: i�.y---..-!!G� L..P/dl�r�t1C.. ?/dzd. County: t7v.P {!!f.......-•....................................
Owner Name: ..... Phone No:................--........--.--......----........................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No:
Mailing Address:... ................ .....
Onsite Representative:... ...... rr_,..Le.A1f AC__C_ Integrator:.... C. k-31-y�.....................
................................................. ......
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:.....................
Location of Farm:
A
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .
Latitude ' 9 �Longitude • 4 "
Design
Current. "' _ -=
'Design- Current Design Current
Swine Capacity
Population Poultry- = .
Ca achy Population Cattle - Capacity Population r:
❑ Wean to Feeder
_.
❑ Layer
-
❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish
3
:;.
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
ElFarrow to Feeder
❑Other
Elarrow to Finish
,_.
Total Design Capacity
-
❑ Gilts
❑Boars
`Total<SSLW
9, �Niimber',of`Lagoons
❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10Spray Field Area
,Holdink,Ponds / Solid -Traps
., m ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes VrNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes
Continued
❑ Yes )dNo
❑ Yes )?fNo
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
7Io
❑ Yes
.I—

Facility Number: — Date of lrispection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over aomlication? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
sa
13. Do the receiving Pe s differ with'those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
t5. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
IT. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
B. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irri tion, free rd, wast�'analysis & soil sole reports)
20. -Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback cri eria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22- Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24- Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
o yiol""atfic}ris:or defciertc>i.. mere . 4 ect- ilirkring this.visit'. • Y:oit :Wiii-rebeiye lid fuith.. .
rorres�onc�ence. abaut this visit~ . . . ....... ... .
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ,No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes /NO
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes /No
❑ Yes AO
❑ Yes E
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes '�dNo
❑ Yes 'ZINo
❑ Yes J�rNo
❑ Yes ;i No
01"Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ) NO
❑ Yes elffNo
❑ Yes ,�No
❑ Yes Aleo
Corninents(refer toryquestion #) - Explain..any YES answers andlar any recommendations orany;other comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional -pages as:necessa"ry) -
1°�eM�f"r�y ��+U`t_t f"�Es P'�£ �C.Qv�'�'-EJJ �� A�P��J'�4rr.I iA c••l��`j � LtiG _
14 r —F, Vt%. wCT- Ag-9—AS ^Ji)PCA-PrCP —FZ�
GOD cti�(4fJk�c.
w
Reviewer inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: G r S _ �^ Date:
3/23/99

Facility Number: 31 — (3 Z. Date of inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes 0No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes RfNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, (-]Yes ;dNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes /No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes A� No
3 L Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes INO
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? Yes ❑ No
AAditional ComTgn4,an or- Pswings::'.
A,
32l �D., C-e-R— (.� �`a SEE . �aT ,Rr�� �rJt�T, AZ'S �£c.Yci.-
/ M PJ- A 4C- 0
Li
3/23/99

Division of Soilar arid. Conservation . Operation=Review
D.Division of Soil and Water Conservation ;CompUance 7irspection c _':. `-
x
Division of Water Quality Compliance hlspectigti ,
y, 0 Other Agency Opeirahon.Revie'w ;_, -
-
_
Q Routine XComplaint Q Frollow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number j Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection M
24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered JE3 Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:............ . .. $ Lt'. A 9-r or— County:
Owner Name: ............................................. . Phone No:............... .
k
FacilityContact : ....................................... ............................................. Title :................................................................ . Phone No: ...................................................
N'lailing Address: .............
Onsite Representative:....; Ll.........'./�F?~�2irG.r.................................. Integrator: ....... 4Gp.1,.� ....
Certified Operator: -------------------- ................. ............................................................. Operator Certification Number :..........................................
Location of Farm:
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude Longitude
Design Current =' ° ' n : ' Design =: Current Design Current
Swine _ _
Capacity Population ;_Poultry , .:Capacity"Population CaEtle_ Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
- ❑ Feeder to Finish Non -Layer Non -Dairy
❑
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
' ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish _ Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts _ -
= ❑ Boars '-_Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons - ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Fietd Area
Holding'.Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System m
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [2 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is ohserved, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, norify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes PrNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes PINo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ......................... .............................................................................................................................................
......
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Continued on back
3/23/99

10 Routine-0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection _0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number 31 97 Date of Inspection 8/16/99
Time of Inspection 11:45 24 hr. (hh:mm}
® Permitted M Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated: .»._.-
Farm Name: Billy Usiatrick Enum County:
Owner Name: Dom_ KI'Ra—___ -___ Phone No: 41i6226A6
Facility Contact: Title:.-......-- .»».......---»..»».».».-- Phone No:._.» .......»» ..... ........ ..... ..»... -.
Mailing Address: P.l, n%14 . » - . Kenawxltle..SIC....».............---------- 283.19 __...
Onsite Representative: .KxtR zL&----------- Integrator: CarxW..a.Ff&d9.J=....... .... _...........-.... .--
Certified Operator. ,$William R Kilpatmkk-_» _... Operator Certification Number .12652 _•......... __
Location of Farm:
------------ _--------------- . _______ ____ _______ __ ________ _....._. .... -.. _.
n�aarLaide�f Slid,37BJAmile&u9x th of 1372
I&
..................... W
Latitude ®• 59 i 05 Longitude 77 • 57 20
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes H No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .-..------------ • .-»........ »...».»»»».» .»...».....»...
Freeboard(inches):-----34 --.. -- M...W».....».. --... -- . ... . ».._ ..............................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes CR No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

State of North -Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Billy Kilpatrick
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
PO Box 94
Kenansville NC 28349
Dear Billy Kilpatrick:
4 0 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 31-97
Duplin County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR], SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the. responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sin 4�
/t7
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number. 31-97 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? '
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancerimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenanceJimprovement?
9. Do any stuctti = lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste AvIftation
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
8/16/99
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
O No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
[9 No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes H No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 0 No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes El No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reuuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (W irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
:A -N& 'Waiiiiii ar:deUielicies•;were' aoie:d:dn'ring ifiii'vWL' Vvtu -iv1flCrerteiV'r ab hirtiiei' :
t�tirr'efiairi>a ili�at�i+'st M1rit 1kBit. in'�itt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9) Permitted facilities are required to maintain a weekly freeboard log.
15) Considerable weeds in some fields; some wet areas not planted to good coverage.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes H No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes ® No
Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Division of Water Quality
April 20, 1999
MEMORANDUM
To: Note to File
From: Brian L. Wrenn 0
IRA
`••
Ad 111111�
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENviRoNMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RE:William Kilpatrick, Billy Kilpatrick Farm, 31-97, discharge to Buckskin Swamp, 2/1/99
Because the discharge was accidental, not the result of a management problem, and the operator
initiated the proper notification and clean-up procedures, Rick Shiver, Water Quality Regional
Supervisor, opted not to pursue enforcement and assessment of a civil penalty.
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Division of Soil and Water`Conservation Operation Review
Q Division of Soil acid Water"Conservation_'- Corriplian'ce Inspection
Drv�sion of Water Quality , Compliance,Inspection
[3 Other_'Agency'- Operation Review.-
Q Routine Q Complaint 10 Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSl4'C review Q Other
Facility Number 3 hate of Inspection Z- 3
1'intc or Inspection F1 .0O 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted )9 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farmdame: ..... „.F-... .County....��s. .........................................................................................................
OwnerName: ..............................bl�.........5iC,.....---...........-................. Phone i\b:......................................-................................................
Facility Contact: .................... ...:.......... Title: -....---....... Phone No:
...... .............................................................
Mailing Address: ....... q&.3........ `'OvMdy....... sk,........................... ......................................1!�'l'SLi1�.Y.1.�L[.�.�................................. ... M4.1........
Onsite Representative: .................. a�� ......V_-J�Fkn Lr............... __ ................ Integrator: ,....-..0.5 ......................................................
Certified Operator: ...................%fturr, 11l.................. Operator Certification Number: ...... 1.{�.�}................
.....
Location of Farm:
Latitude I =, Longitude Z'? 'F $-7 ` ®"
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
JE3 Layer
I
I
Dairy
Feeder to Finish
1E1 Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
o
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JEI Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JEI No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a: If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. II' discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters []Waters of the State
c. if discharLe is observed. what is the estimated flow in !cal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
[] Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
Structure 6
Freeboard (inches): ...................................
1/6/99 Continued on back

F.ikility. Nkimber: Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need main ten ancelimprovement?
8. Does any pant of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste_ Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
12. Crop type.................................................................:................................................................................................................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
..........................
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agTency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
1p; No.vialutior�s •or. deficiencies .were noted...... this;visit:. You will.. eu . ive no further . ;. •.
correspoiidei�ce; about; this visit ; :: : ......................
Comments (refer to question #):" Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other, comments.,
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional, pages as, necessary) s
AagkS,c Akv-_ 1L=.1�P{�ie4L COj,_;hve_ �Jmtj
�arg 40 CahSA U&✓ - a orsset} uso�� l oj;\�, to �kg130N.
•J
Reviewer/Inspector Name0.
Reviewer/lnspector Signature: Date:
1 /6199

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Billy Kilpatrick
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
PO Box 94
Kenansville NC 28349
Dear Billy Kilpatrick:
IT1 �601WA
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCE5
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 31-97
Duplin County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRYI, DRY2, DRY3, SLURI, SLUR2,
SLDI, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
cc: , Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerel
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Ouality
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
February 24, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL Z 418 220 475
RETURN. RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. William R. Kilpatrick
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
463 Routledge Street
Kenansville, NC 28349
39
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANC) NATURAL REsOuRCEs
Subject: NOTICE OF RECOMMENDATION FOR ENFORCEMENT
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Kenansville, NC
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Kilpatrick:
We
This letter is to notify you that the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality is considering
submittal of a recommendation for enforcement action to the Director of the Division of Water Quality. The
recommendation concerns the violation of Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code, Chapter 2, Subchapter
2H, Section .0217(d). On February 1, 1999, in response to regional office notification, Mr. Brian Wrenn from the
Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality inspected your animal operation and the lagoon(s) serving
this operation. It was observed that a recycle wastewater line had ruptured and leaked animal waste into an adjacent
stone water diversion. The waste traveled along the diversion and discharged to Buckskin Swamp. Buckskin Swamp
are class "C-Swamp" waters of the State in the Northeast Cape Fear River Basin.
If you have an explanation for this violation that you wish to present, please respond in writing to me within ten
(10) days after receipt of this Notice. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action is still deemed
appropriate, your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for his consideration.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Brian L. Wrenn, or myself at the
Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
_�
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Compliance Section
-Wili2l ngtonFiIEs�n
S:1 WQSIBRIAN W1ENF99131-97.ROE
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

wQ
Z. 418. 220 475 $�
l
US Postal Service
Receipt for Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided.
Do not use for International Mail See reverse
sent t I
t3 tnrr, Aar rr
Postage $
Certified Fee ' . qn
Spedal Delivery Fee
r
r
Restricted Delivery Fee
h r
Return
VSPO
LL
n

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
February 10, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL 4 Z 418 220 474
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. William R. Kilpatrick
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
463 Routledge Street
Kenansville, NC 28349
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Notice of Violation
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Farm Number: 31-97
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Kilpatrick:
You are hereby notified that Billy Kilpatrick Farm, which has been permitted to have a
nondischarge permit for an animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217 and G.S
143.215.1, has been found to be in violation of its Animal Waste Permit AWS310097.
On February 1, 1999, in response to regional office notification, Mr. Brian Wrenn from the
Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality inspected your animal operation and
the lagoon(s) serving this operation. It was observed that a recycle wastewater line had ruptured and
leaked animal waste into an adjacent storm water diversion. The waste traveled along the diversion
and discharged to Buckskin Swamp. Buckskin Swamp are class "C-Swamp" waters of the State in
the Northeast Cape Fear River Basin.
This is a violation of Part I. Performance Standards, Section 1 and Part II. Operation and
Maintenance Requirements, Section 1 of the Animal Waste Permit AWS310097.
The Division of Water Quality may proceed to revoke Billy Kilpatrick Farm permit unless
the following conditions are completed:
1. Immediately eliminate the discharge of wastewater and/or list actions to correct the noted
violation.
2. Make any and all modifications needed to ensure there will be no future discharges.
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

1
m
SPENDER:
I also wish to receive the
9
cc
■ Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services.
■ Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b.
following services ( for an
+
j
m
■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this
extra fee):
a;
m
card to you.
■ Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
Ij{
' rmi
■ W et"Return Receipt Requested'on the mailpiece below the article number.
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
N
t
,+
t
■ dThe Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
gd
Consult postmaster for fee.
a
o
3. Aicle Addressed to: '
4a. Article Number
a
7 2e
m
a
t/{�W
4b. Service Type
I
n
L
❑ Registered ❑ Certified
p�
Express Mail ❑ Insured
t f
[
❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD
�
7. Date of Delivery
o
I
}
_
—' qq
a
a�I
5. Received By: (Pant Name)
B. Addressee's Address (Only if requested
Y
and fee is paid)
�j
6. Signature: (Address a or Agent)
°b
PS F rm 8 , December 1994
tozs9s 9s$-0zz9 Domestic Return Receipt'

Mr. William R. Kilpatrick
February 10, 1999
Page 2
To remain a permitted facility, you must notify this office in writing within seven (7) days
of the receipt of this notice, what actions will be taken to comply with your waste management plan.
Failure to comply with the above conditions will cause the existing animal waste management
system serving your animal operation to be considered in operation without a permit as required by
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1.
Please be advised that this assessment does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from
taking enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violations.
When all required corrective actions are complete, please notify this office in writing. if you
have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to contact either Mr. Brian L.
Wrenn, of our Wilmington Office at (910)-395-3900 or Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone],
ext. 581.
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Harold Jones, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation
Kenneth Best, Duplin County Health Department
Don Butler, Carroll's Foods, Inc.
DWQ Operations Branch File
Wilmington Files
SAWQS\BRIAN W\ENF99\31-97.NOV

Z"�418 220 474 w�
US Postal Service
Receipt for Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided.
uo not use for International Mail See reverse
ntt
�.
rer
mNu
i
P 5tale, 6 ZIP C a
Postage
3
Certifi`ed Fee
Spada] Delivery Fee
r
Restdcted Delivery Fee
ai
Return Receipt Showing to
Whom ✓!< Date Delivered
Date, ft s Address
q9
0
TOTAL Postage 6 Fees6 t=
r
Postrnark or Date
LL
1C��t0
film �SyS
rA
a

•��
'
III
_
+1 +
_
4+ �
�
;1 _y, 1
f
r
.k•
r +
*
k
£'
i
'. °i1' 'r}
{
ti? g -
N
i11Tu
A,
y� 1F�r17.1'Y. 1 P
r
E s�''� : {,k' 1
�
.��-
1
,
i
--�
U
i
G7
rt
I
j+F�{.
r ! �3 fi' �k'
l�iE
'�
l • th� rti/.ij': 1' �.. '-
ry1:4
'�1��''
�
-ii'
a 'r"x, (. f
.
..
_. � J�sII #`'.-
- j
''
5':.
r•1`
1
'S
,. ,`1t},+',A;; r i b..
s �E' ti '+y . k.�
F'
Y{.
J , ,
.'
+
f�'
-
" .... e,.•
.. . ��.
1 i�{, t .- k ,r.! .i -
1
s
t ,4 8 Ri- Yid i''�' Y ,•�,
��, ,
,. ..
1•,� ',j. ir'�.y {• r�! ... `t°f { L,- t�.'1 4i p..r..,.'S r ,�3�% i' �!€-.}, I
•,
.s - 'i
t
i -
'. 1.
� .j. '• ''.
. ..
- 1, ' {.

t 31-97-2/l/99-Path of runoff through drainage diversion adjacent to lagoon.

=31-97-2/l/99-Buckskin Swamp immediately downstream of discharge point.
;31-97-2/l/99-Sample Point 92 in Buckskin Swamp immediately downstream of discharge point.
r

Lenvi7roehem
I
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC
Sample Collection and Chain of Custody
i
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Sam le T e: Influent
Effluent Well k St
oil other:
SAMPLE
IDENTIFICATION
COLLECTION
Comp
or
Gab
CIZ
mga'
LAB
ID
PRESERVATION
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
DATE
TIME
TEMP
NONE
IICI
I12SO4
SNO,
NeO11
TRIO
OTHER
e -�1
Z�t
=3�
!/
iCc
r
NU 31-91
��`%
14=
C
1V
3 -a-r
Zl,�
l :qd
C
1
fpcj
Z NU
z1,
14 = qo
C
Iv s
C
i
G
C
i
G
C
G
C
FG
C
G
LL
NOTICE — DECHLORINATION : Samples for Ammonia, TKN, Cyanide, Phenol, and Bacteria must be dechlorinated
(0.2 ppm or less) in the field at the time of collection. See reverse side for instructions.
Temperature when errived: Accepted:'
Delivered By: Received By:.
Continents: 61,
Resampl equested:
Date: Time:

1
.r
i
State of North Carolina
'Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
February 10, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL # Z 418 220 474
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. William R. Kilpatrick
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
463 Routledge Street
Kenansville, NC 28349
/ � s
NCDENFZ
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANi) NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Notice of Violation
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Farm Number: 31-97
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Kilpatrick:
This is to notify William R. Kilpatrick, who holds a nondischarge permit for an animal waste
disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217 and G.S 143.215.1, of violations of Animal
Waste Permit AWS310097.
In response to your phone call, on February 1, 1999 Mr. Brian Wrenn from the Wilmington
Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality inspected your animal operation and the lagoon
serving this operation. It was observed that a recycle wastewater line had ruptured and leaked animal
waste into an adjacent storm water diversion. The waste traveled along the diversion and discharged
to Buckskin Swamp. Buckskin Swamp are class "C-Swamp" waters of the State in the Northeast
Cape Fear River Basin.
This is a violation of Part 1. Performance Standards, Section I of AWS310097 which
prohibits the discharge of waste from the animal waste management system. The incident also
violates Part II.Operation and Maintenance Requirements, Section 1 of AWS310097 which requires
proper maintenance and operation of the animal waste management system.
To correct these violations, please submit a Plan of Action to the Wilmington Regional
Office of the Division of Water Quality that describes the actions to be taken to comply with Animal
Waste Permit AWS310097. The plan should include the following:
1. The procedures followed to immediately eliminate the discharge of wastewater.
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

'Mr. William R. Kilpatrick
February 10, 1999
Page 2
2. A list of any and all modifications needed to ensure there will be no future discharges along
with a timetable for the completion of the modifications.
The proposed plan of action must be received by this office in writing within fifteen
(15) working days of the receipt of this notice. Upon approval and implementation of the plan,
you must notify this office when the corrective actions are complete.
If the violations are not corrected, the Division of Water Quality may pursue additional
civil penalties, injunctive relief, or permit revocation.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to contact either
Mr. Brian L. Wrenn, of our Wilmington Office at (910)-395-3900 or Mr. Shannon Langley at
[phone], ext. 581.
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Harold Jones, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation
Kenneth Best, Duplin County Health Department
Don Butler, Carroll's Foods, Inc.
DWQ Operations Branch File
Wilmington Files
SAWQS\BR1AN W\ENF991SHELL.NOV

.«
qmi
MAR 0 9 1999
is
cam___._ _ _ c_u�►�,-,_,
10

Hog Houses
Broken Wastewater
Recycle Line
Storm Water
Diversion
Lagoon
Sample Point #1
Puddled Waste
Sample Point #2
Buckskin Swamp
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Facility # 31-97
Duplin County
Not to scale

05 : 24A Env i r-ochem 910 392 4424 P.01
l`
�,.'s:,
CONSULTING
CHEMISTS
Date C
Fax
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
6602 WindmiLL Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
FAX TRANSMITTAL
910-392-0223 Phone
910-392-4424 Fax
Company: �� -)D( �jl 12 - DW
No. of Pages
to Fallow:
@ ENVIROCHEM
A/IrLk-IC'IS -fie
31-C)�T

rn
web--n3-99 08:24A Envirochem 910 392 4424 P.02
CONSULTNG
CH_WSTS
C�stUlr9cr:
Nt DEH,NR-DWQ
47 N Cardinal Drive Ext.
W`Jminoon, NC 2W5
At#n: Rick Shiver
Brian Wrenn
P?te Sarri*A:
S,impled By:
STRE, hl: 31-97
02/01 /99
Brian Wrenn
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
IMAILLNG ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: SHIPPING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1037 [phone] (Office) 6602 Windmill Vac•
Wrightsville Beach, [phone] (Lab) Wilmington,
North Carolina 28480 (930) 392-4-124 (Fax) North tarn?irna 28435
NCDEHNR: DWQ CERTIFICATE #94, DLS CERTIFICATE 437729
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Date of Report : Fcbruan- 3s- 1999
CFe.«.1 (�e*sLt k a,�1y
Purchase Order A -
Report Number: 9-0319
Report To: Rick Shier
Copy To: Brian Wrenn
PARAMETER
Sample ID
31-97 31-97
Lab ID
9 0716 A-B
K 0717 A-B
Colircrm, coloniesl100ml
200,000
2200
,° ;tr c + Mtrite Mtrogen, NO, + NOi - N mgfL
r'�rnw-)r6a lt�trogen, NH,-N, mglL
opi kejeldahl Nitrogen, TKN mg1L
�
Tots; Phosphorus, P mglL
k
e ,
cviewed b and approved for release to the client.

I
N
N
m
0
E
QI
i
U
0
c
w
vil
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC
Sample Collection and Chain of Custody
6602 Windmill way
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Client:
Collected 13 L- Report No: D 3 r7
Sam tle 1 e: Influent Effluent Well Str
'oil Other:
SAMPLE
IDENTIFICATION
' .. �: _� �—_ �yf '_�.i-.---
COLLECTION
cramp
ter
Grab
.._. �---••-
cl,
mg/L
--------
LAB
ID
PRESERVATION
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
DATE
TIME
TEMP
NONE,
11C:1
"'%0'
u-No,
Na(111
1'3110
OTTER
�
I -;2'S~
-------
1/
•--I�' C
t-, y ,'__ _..�QLk�+sty
O717
07,7�
ZNvI�
/
.1
�f4,y0
G
f�
c
NOTICE -- DEC1HLOR➢NATION : Samples for Ammonia, `l'KN, Cyanide, Phenol, and Bacteria.must be dechlorinated
(0.2 ppm or less) in the field at the time of collection. See reverse side for instructions.
f r
Refinouislied 13y;"Time
Received Bye
Date/Time
-Yran
_
2
Temperature evhen eceived: S G p�- Accepted: �/ lte' cted Resampl f equested:
° c:livcrerl 113 _ =`�� _- _�_� . Ra.crive€1 ley: _ � �
y'----d,� /____ date
Comments:

Feb-.09-99 03:44P Envirochem 910 392 4424 P_01
a100
(a
CONSULTING
CHEMISTS
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
FAX TRANSMITTAL
Date z Ici 1qC1
To:
Fax
From:
910-392-0223 Phone
910-392-4424 Fax
Company: E CDC Me - DV\/Q
No, of Pages
to FotLoN'
@ ENVIROCHEN
Message: 4o-o-l-os(z) 1 \ e, u 1 7 S Kp aor � q 0310

Feb-09-99 03:44P Envirochem 910 392 4424 P-02
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
envirochem Al
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: SHIPPING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box t037 (9t0) 256-3934 (Office) 6602 Windmill Way
Wrightsville Beach, [phone] (Lab) Wilmington,
CONSULTING Forth Carolina 28480 (910) 3924424 (Fax) North Carolina 28405
CHEMISTS NCDEHNR: DWQ CERTIFICATE #94, DLS CERTIFICATE #37729
Customer:
NCDEHNR-DWQ
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext_
Wilmington, NC 2W
Attn: Rick Shiver
Brian Wrenn
Date Sampled:
Sampled By:
STREAM: 31-97
02101 /99
Brian Wrenn
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Date of Report : February 9, 1999
Purchase Order #:
Report Number: 9-0319
Report To: Rica: Sbiver
Copy To: Brian Wrenn
PARAMETER
Sample ID
31-97
31-97
Lab 11D
# 0716 A-B
# 0717 A-B
Fecal Coiiform, colonies/100m1
200,000
2200
Nitrate + Nitrite Nitrogen, NO, + NOs - N mg/L
195
0.49
Ammonia Nitrogen, NH,-N, mg/L
275
6.18
Total Kejeldahl Nitrogen, TKN mg/L
339
8.05
Total Phosphorus, P mg/L
51.1
0.78
Reviewed b and approved for release to the client_

rirochDem
E
t
U
0
•r
W
a
Ln
m
O
rn
rn
rn
O
a�
U.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC
Sample Collection and Chain of Custody
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Collected By: Sxi a-, _ ! (nktn r.' - - Report No: y - © 3 If
Sam le'U e: Inlhient
1':11luent Well 5tr
oil other
:
SAMPLE
IDENTIFICATION
COLLECTION
Comp
or
Grab
CII
m �'
LAB
ID
PRESERVATION
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
DATE
TIME
TEMP
NONEitCl
u,Su,
ttNo,
Nsl)tl
T1110
OTHER
Z(�
ti :ice
r.
0 7164
69
A
a 9 :46
o
a 7,
u--
I —
�tf
,r
C
—
C
G
G
G
LG
NOTICE — DECHLORINATION : Samples for Ammonia, TKN, Cyanide, Phenol, and Bacteria must be dechlorinated
(0.2 ppm or less) in the field at the time of collection. See reverse side for instructions.
Transfer
Temperature whe euived: s• L Accepted: t/
Delivered By: eceived By;
Comments: l
Resampl equested: .17
Date: i Time:
71

Hog Houses
Broken Wastewater
Recycle Line
Storm Water
Diversion
Sample Point #1
Lagoon
Waste
iple Point #2
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Facility # 31-97
Duplin County
Not to scale

En
envirochem
® MAILINGIN
P.O. BWrightsviCONSULTING North CarCHEMISTS
RECTviro 77 ?k� Chemists, Inc.
VF
I PHONE: SHIPPING ADDRESS:
137 [phone] (Office) 6602 Windmill Way
—b%F E B 14 1999 (91 392-0223 (Lab) Wilmington,
28480 (91 392-4424 (Fax) North Carolina 28405
TE #94, DLS CERTIFICATE #37729
Customer:
NCDEHNR DWQ Date of Report : February 9, 1999
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405 Purchase Order #:
Attn: Rick Shiver
Brian Wrenn Report Number: 9-0319
Date Sampled:
Sampled By:
STREAM: 31-97
02/01/99
Brian Wrenn
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Report To: Rick Shiver
Copy To: Brian Wrenn
PARAMETER
Sample ID
31-97
31-97
Lab ID
# 0716 A-B
# 0717 A-B
Fecal Coliform, colonies/100ml
200,000
2200
Nitrate + Nitrite Nitrogen, NO3 + N% - N mg/L
1.95
0.48
Ammonia Nitrogen, N113-N, mg/L
275
6.18
Total Kejeldahl Nitrogen, TKN mg/L
339
8.05
Total Phosphorus, P mg/L
51.1
0.78
Reviewed b 5 and approved for release to the client.

:envirochemn.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC
Sample Collection and Chain of Custody
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone]
FAX: (9I0) 392-4424
Collected By: Skmr, I-- Fnkn r%' Report No: D 3 OF
Sam le 7' e: Intluent Effluent, Well `St
'oil Other:
SAMPLE
IDENTIFICATION
COLLECTION
Comp
or
Grab
C12
m�
LAB
ID
PRESERVATION
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
DATE
TIME
TEMP
NONE
xc[
x,so,
[[No,
Nao[[
Tx[o
OTHER
NU
C
C 717 .4
V
CGS W+
zf i 1
r��d
C
C
G
C
G
C
G
C
G
C
G
C
G
NOTICE — DECHLORINATION : Samples for Ammonia, TKN, Cyanide, Phenol, and Bacteria must be dechlorinated
(0.2 ppm or less) in the field at the time of collection. See reverse side for instructions.
Temperature when ec$ived: r-6 QC-.- Accepted: t/ Re' cted: Resampl equested:
Delivered By: eceived By: Date: Time:
Comments: 71

II rORTANT NOTICE
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is strictly enforcing EPA regulations for sample collection
and preservation.
Client Must Provide the Following Information
1. SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION (Container Associated with requested testing)
2. SAMPLE TYPE (Composite, Grab, Water, Soil, etc.)
3. DATE COLLECTED
4. TIME COLLECTED
5.'SAMPLE COLLECTOR
6. PRESERVATION (Including Temperature and pH )
Teraperat➢ir_ _Samples MUST be refrigeratr,; or aece.r'ed on ice bet vreen
2 and 6° C. Samples received within two (2) hours of collection must show a downward trend.
Therefore, please record temperature at collection in space provided on collection sheet.
pH : _A two (2) hour limit to chemically preserve samples by pH adjustment is allowed, except for
metals samples reported to the Groundwater Section which must be acidified at the time of collection.
DECHLORINATION INSTRUCTIONS
CAUTION: DO NOT Mix thiosulfate with acid in bottle before collecting sample as a
violent reaction will occur.
Dechlorinating Sam les that Require Acid Preservation
1. Add 4-5 granules of thiosulfate to a bottle with no acid preservative
( unpreserved BOD/TSS bottle).
2. After mixing to diss:Iove the thiosulfate, pour half of the sample into a bottie containing acid as a
preservative ( AmmoniwTICN)
3. Then completely fill both battles with fresh sample.
The Laboratory will verify and document the above requested information.
ref. NCAC 211.0805 a) (7) (M)
" At anytime a laboratory receives samples which do not meet sample collection, holding time, or preservation
requirements, the labora-tory must notify the sample collector or client and secure another sample if possible. If
another sample cannot boe secured, the original sample may be analyzed, but the results reported must be
qualified with the nature of the infraction(s). And the laboratory must notify the State Laboratory about the
infraction(s). The notification must include a statement indicating corrective actions taken to prevent the
problem for future same-les. —
ref. NCAC 2H.0805 (a) (7) M. "
r

PI-SLnuEfa
■Complete :.erns 3 ardor 2 for additional services.
I also wish to receive the
do ■Complete Items 3, 4a, and 4b.
Jollowing services (for an
+Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return
this
ext�'fee):
card to you.
■Attach this form to the front of the mallplece, or on the back If space does not
.•:
1;,�7,Addressee's Address
`
■ Write'Retum Receipt Requested' on the mailpiece below the article number.
2, ❑ Restricted Delivery
■The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
c delWared•
Consult postmaster for fee.
3. Article Addressed o: /
4a. Article Number
4b. Service Type
$ ❑ Registered ertiflet
.W3 p IPdr ❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured
❑ Retum Receipt for Mer0tartdkse ❑ COD
7. pate of Delivery
5.
and fee Is paid)
6. Signature: Addressee or
X " n
PS Forth 381ember 994 102595.97•B-0179

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
PM
Y-
• Print your name, at�dre �n 21P Code Tn tFlls borw•�""'--
r ,� - _
Environment, Health & � �.. �-,�aurces
127 Cardinal Cr. U1.
Wilmington, IBC 28405

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Division of Water Quality
June 3, 1998
'fi MV Z 312 646 438
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Billy Kilpatrick
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
PO Box 723
Kenansville, NC 28349
1 • •
F4CDENR
NORTH GRoLmA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANP NAcruRAL RESOURCES
Subject: SECOND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Billy Kilpatrick
Facility Number: 31-97
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Kilpatrick:
On May 29, 1998, staff from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality inspected your animal operation and the lagoon(s) serving this operation. It was observed
that erosion cuts on the inner dike wall of the lagoon could threaten the integrity of the structure.
A previous Notice of Deficiency was issued on September 15, 1997, based on a September 12,
1997 inspection by DWQ staff. At this time, it was observed that there were erosion cuts on. the
inner dike wall of the lagoon. -
Erosion on the dike wall of the lagoon is a violation of your Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan, and subsequent infractions may result in a Notice of Violation and include a
civil penalty. The erosion cuts on the lagoon dike wall should be filled with a suitable clay
material and revegetated with an appropriate cover. In addition, the grassed waterway by the farm
road should be graded and revegetated to ensure no ponding or runoff occurs during waste
application. Erosion in the storm water diversion adjacent to the lagoon should be repaired. We
suggest that you contact your service company, local MRCS office, or Soil and Water District
office for any assistance they may be able to provide to correct these situations.
To remain a deemed permitted facility, you must notify this office in writing within seven
(7) days of the receipt of this notice, what actions will be taken to comply with your waste
management plan. Failure to do so may result in the facility losing it's deemed permitted status,
requiring it to obtain an individual non discharge permit.
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

_-, A
,tZ 312 646 438
W9
US Postal Service ,
Receipt for Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided.
Do not use for Intemadonal Mail (See revetse)
♦f ZIP Code r
Postage $ �J
Certified Fee Ys
Spedial Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
uO
rn Retum Receipt Showing to
Whom h Date Delivered r
Retum Receipt
Date, d Addressee' dresel� Ir !
0 TOTAL P ge ee
Postmark Del 4
0.

Mr. Billy Kilpatrick
June 3, 1998
Page 2
Please be aware it is a violation of North Carolina General Statutes to discharge wastewater
to the surface waters of the State without a permit. The Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 per day per
violation.
When the required corrective actions are complete, you must notify this office in writing
at the address below. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call David
Holsinger or Brian Wrenn at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,.
Brian L. Wrenn
Environmental Specialist
cc: Harold Jones, County Soil and Water Conservation
Sandra Weitzel, NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Don Butler, Carroll's Foods, Inc.
Operations Branch
Wilmington Files
S.IWQS1BRb NWIDEF981DUPLIM3l-97-2.DEF

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor LL
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 22, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RE —TURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Billy Kilpatrick
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
463 Routledge St_
KenansviIle NC 28349
Dear Billy Kilpatrick:
ECET CF
E
OCT 2 71998
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. 31-0097
Additional Information Request
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Duplin County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject
application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address and submit
the following information by November 21, 1998:
1. The site map provided with your application package does not show field numbers 8, and
10 of Tract number 3186 as listed on Table 1 of your waste utilization plan. Please provide
a clearer field map identifying all tract numbers, field numbers, and acreage listed on your
waste utilization plan.
2: The Emergency Action Plan for your farm is missing. It should he submitted as part of the certified
waste management plan.
Please note that all revisions or amendments made to the waste utilization plan (WUP) or a
portion thereof are required to be signed and dated by both the landowner and the Technical
Specialist before they are submitted for review.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All
information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The
information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before November 21, 1998 or the Division will return
your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H _0200 and your facility will be considered to
be operating without a permit_
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is
a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the
Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
Sincerely,
]R" Joshil
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resour
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.,
Billy Kilpatrick
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
PO Box 94
Kenansville, NC 28349
Dear Mr. Kilpatrick:
OCT 3 a 1997
October 28, 1997
Subject: Application No. 31-097
Additional Information Request
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Duplin County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject
application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the
following by November 27, 1997:
1) As required by item I.3 of the General Permit for Liquid Animal Waste Operations
Application Form, please submit two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP).
2) As required by item I.2 of the General Permit for Liquid Animal Waste Operations
Application Form, please submit two copies of a general location map indicating the location
of the animal waste facilities and field locations where animal waste is disposed.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information.
All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address
below. The information requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before November 27, 1997, or
the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and
your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
PIease be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid
permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement
authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any, questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 362.
M
Si
r
Michael T. Lewandowski
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality
Michael Sugg, USDA-NRCS
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

RECEIVED SEP 2 9 1991
September 25, 1997
Mr. Brian Wrenn
Environmental Specialist
State of North Carolina
Dept. of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405--3845
Dear Mr. Wrenn:
I have received the notice of deficiency from your
office concerning my inspection on September 12, 1997.
Please allow me 45 days to make the recommended repairs to
comply with my waste management plan.
Thank you,
Billy Kilpatrick
5c (� O IPON- 4c.- Farr
Fo- tzu� * 31-9-7
1) kptf r, Ca "

I"W"
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr. Division of Water Quality Wayne McDevitt
Governor Secretary
September 15, 1997
PNzX4 4 1] AIR-Ok &:. ;&N i I *)a-. No. P, - M.
Billy Kilpatrick
Billy Kilpartick Farm
PO Box 94
Kenansville, NC 28349
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
Facility Number: 31-97
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Kilpatrick:
On September 12, 1997 Staff from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality,
inspected your animal operation and the lagoon(s) serving this operation. It was observed that some erosion
of the clay liner has occurred on the lagoon. Large cuts were observed in various sections of the inner dike
wall of the lagoon around the inlet pipes. It is our concern that some of these gullies may become deep
enough to cut through the liner material and sacrifice the integrity of the structure. No irrigation records
were on site at the time of the inspection.
As was discussed at the time of the inspection, the cuts should be filled with a suitable clay material,
compacted and reseeded with an appropriate vegetative cover. Irrigation records should be on site at all
times. In addition, the inlet pipes should be extended further into the lagoon and the eroded areas bacld-illed
with clay and reseeded, and the rodent holes should be filled and reseeded. We suggest that you contact your
service company, local NRCS or Soil and Water District office for any assistance they may be able to
provide to correct the situation.
To remain a deemed permitted facility, you must notify this office in writing within fourteen (14) days
of the receipt of this notice, what actions will be taken to comply with your waste management plan. Failure
to do so may result in the facility losing it's deemed permitted status, requiring it to obtain an individual non
discharge permit.
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 29405-3945 0 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Aff—tive Action Employer

r +r
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
September 15, 1997
Page 2.
Please be aware it is a violation of North Carolina General Statutes and Rules to discbarge wastewater
to the surface waters of the State without a permit and/or to fail to follow a certified waste management plan.
The Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources has the authority to levy a civil penalty of
not more than $10,000 per day per violation.
When the required corrective actions are complete, please notify this office in writing at the address
below. If you have any questions concerning this _matter, please call David Holsinger, Andy Helminger or
Brian Wrenn at 910-395-3900. t,
Sincerely,
Brian L. Wrenn
Environmental Specialist
cc: Billy Houston, County Soil and Water Conservation
Sandra Weitzel, NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Don Butler, Carroll's Foods
Operations Branch
Wilmington Files
9

State of North Carolina "WED
Department of Environment,' ''
Health and Natural ResourcesL13
SEp 15 1991
Division of Water Quality
r,
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
September 11, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Billy Kilpatrick
Billy Kilpatrick Farm
PO Box 94
Kenansville NC 28349
Farm Number: 31-97
Dear Billy Kilpatrick:
A4�JR
C)EHNR
You are hereby notified that Billy Kilpatrick Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has thirty 30 da s to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. -In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section
19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified
by the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified
date. Your application must be returned within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit
the application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions
for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package. The
signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location reap, and
two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the application
package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any question concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at (919) 733'5083 extension
363 or Dave Holsinger with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
VA. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Wilmington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
William Kilpatrick
William Robert Kilpatrick Farm
PO Box 94 Rutledge Rd
Kenansville NC 28349
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation .
Facility: William Robert Kilpatrick Farm
Facility ID#: 31-97
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Kilpatrick:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely;
A: Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., erector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, WAW�
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 N'Vf An Equal Opportunity/AffirrmaWe Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/100% post -consumer paper

REGISTRATION FORM FOR ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERAT 4S
Department of Environment, Health and Natural . 0u27eoz
Division of Environmental Management :`.
Water'Quality Section j
N 'VA rER QUA) ITY
If the animal waste management system for your feedlot ation-ia•
designed to serve more than or equal to 100 head of•75
horses, 250 swine, 1,000 sheep, or 30,000 birds that are served by
a liquid waste system, then this form must be filled out and mailed
by December 31, 1993 pursuant to'-15A.NCAC 2H.0217 (c) in order. to be
deemed -permitted by DEM. Please print clearly.
Farm Name:, !r illicalm T�nKr� !�-n+-Y-,'ck_)
Mailing Address7->n77--cV. CI _T-;LL4-1
County: I in Phone No.
Owner (s) Name: Coi I i l'arn C r4- K; 7c-fr;ck-
Manager (s) Name:
Lessee Name:
Farm Location (Be as specific as possible: road names, direction,
milepost; etc.) f'rnrr, _�4wv, It
Latitude/Longitude if known:
Design capacity of animal waste management system -(Number and type
of confined animal (s) ) : -.... 4320n'i5h hon1&.
Average anima. population_ on the farm (Number and type "of animal (s)
raised) _�.20
:qo., . .t_
Year-Production'Began:.igq ASCS .Tract No. r7�
Type of : Waste Management System _Used: Lo_qoori`- irx'rJ.A- Gib
Acres -Available foi: ,Land Application of ~Waste_ : - L�0-
Owner (s) -LSignature'(s.)��- )i DATE 1'11/2-Q
DATE,

State of Noah Carolina
Department of Environment,
Heclth and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 17, 1994
William Kilpatrick
P.O. Box 94 Rutledge Road
Kenansville NC 28349
Dear Mr. Kilpatrick:
This is to inform you that your completed registration form required by the recently
modified nondischarge rule has been received by the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM), Water Quality Section.
On December 10, 1992 the Environmental Management Commission adopted a water
quality rule which governs animal waste management systems. The goal of the rule is for
animal operations to be managed such that animal waste is not discharged to surface waters
of the state. The rule allows animal waste systems to be "deemed permitted" if certain
minimum criteria are met (15A NCAC 2H .0217). By submitting this registration you have
met one of the criteria for being deemed permitted.
We would like to remind you that existing feedlots which meet the size thresholds
listed in the rule, and any new or expanded feedlots constructed between February 1, 1993
and December 31, 1993 must submit a signed certification form (copy enclosed) to DEM by
December 31, 1997. New or expanded feedlots constructed after December 31, 1993 must
obtain signed certification before animals are stocked on the farm. Certification of an
approved animal waste management plan can be obtained after the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission adopts rules later this year.
We appreciate you providing us with this information. if you have any question about
the new nondischarge rule, please contact David Harding at [phone].
Sincerely,
Steve Tedder, Chief
enc:. Water Quality Section _
P.O. Box 29535. Rdeigh, Norm Caroflnc 2762643535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer .50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper