310066_HISTORICAL_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number:
31-66
County: Duplin
Facility Name: Charles Edwards Jr /Cedar Lane Faun
Certified Operator Name: Charles Edwards Jr Operator Number:
24120
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID
Spiilway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
CE1 CE2
N N
15 1s
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic -balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 2/11/2016
hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Charles Edwards Jr
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Phone: [phone]
Date: 2/7/2016
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE
STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure ID: CE1
line m =
678.9 lb PAN
2. Structure ID: CE2
line m =
312.7 lb PAN
3. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 991.6lbPAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD-
O. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(lb/acre)
t TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (Ibs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
70870
1
Bermuda/Muta
6.20
307.00
1903.4
911-8131
70870
1A
Bermuda/Muta
1.70
335.00
569.5
9/1--8/31
70870
2
Bermuda/Muta
6.20
237.00
1469.4
9/1-8/31
70870
3
Bermuda/Muta
4.67
212.00
990.0
911-8131
70870
4
Bermuda/Muta
6.20
247.00
1531.4
9/1-8/31
708701
5
Bermuda/Muta
4.93
263.00
1296.6
911-8131
70870
5A
Bermuda/Muta
1.35
335.00
452.3
911-8131
70870
6
Bermuda/Muta
1.95
280.00
546.0
911-8131
70870
6A
BermudalMuta
1.55
320.00
496.0
911-8/31
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 9254.6 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 991.6 Ib. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section Ill) = 9254.6 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -8263 Ib. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information, if new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation to begin as conditions permit. Rainfall in excess of 6 inches in 48 hours has made pumping extremely
difficult.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): CE1
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 15.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 4.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 103600 ftz
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/W 258309 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g, volume of waste produced according to structural design 116047 ft3
h. current herd # 2750 certified herd # 3520
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 daysAine f=
4. Total PAN to be land appliedduring draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 12128/2015
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
90662 ft'
-�ft3
60433.3 W
188365 gallons
1.52 Ibs/1000 gal.
678.9 lbs. PAN

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelldentifier (ID): ICE2
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 15.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 4.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 55100 ft2
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallonslft3 137383 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 58164 ft3
h. current herd # 1 -0-0-01 certified herd # 1760
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 33048 ft'
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 12/28/2015
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
Oft3
32141.7 ft3
81269 gallons
1.43 Ibs11000 gal.
312.7 lbs. PAN
�w

PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 31-66
County: Duplin
Facility Name: Charles Edwards Jr /Cedar Lane Farm
Certified Operator Name: Charles Edwards Jr_ Operator Number: 24120
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons,with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
CE1
N
17
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 3/12/2014
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Charles Edwards Jr Phone:
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date:
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
910-298-5421
3/7/2014

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR./24
HR. STORM
STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE
STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: CE1
line m =
651.5 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID: CE1
line m =
175.9 lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 827.4 lb PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD_ DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 3n DAY PERIOD_
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR-
2 PAN balance
(Iblacre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD jibs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
70870
1
Bermuda/Muta
6.20
279.00
1729,8
9/1--8/31
708701
1A
BermudalMuta
1.70
310.00
527.0
9/1--8/31
70870
2
Bermuda/Muta
6.20
277.00
1717.4
9/1--8131
70870
3
Bermuda/Muta
4.67
267.00
1246.9
911--8/31
70870
4
Bermuda/Meta
6.20
302.00
1872A
9/1--8/31
70870
5
BermudalMuta
4.93
270.00
1331.1
911--8/31
70870
5A
BermudalMuta
1.35
324.00
437.4
911--8/31
70870
6
BermudalMuta
1.95
282.00
549.9
9/1--8/31
70870
6A
BermudalMuta
1.55
335.00
519.3
911--8/31
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 9931.1 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 827.4 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section Ill) = 9931.1 lb, PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -9104 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation to begin as conditions permit. Rainfall almost daily has made pumping extremely difficult.
PoA (30 Day) 2121 /00

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): CE1
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) _
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallonsW'
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design
17.0 inches
19.0 inches
2.0 inches
103600 ft'
129155 gallons
180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 116047 ft3
h. current herd # 1365 certified herd # 3520
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i, volume of wash water according to structural design
j, excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated I 3/7/2014
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
45001 fts
®ft3
60433.3 ft3
131442 gallons
2.50 Ibs/1000 gal.
651.5 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): CE2
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 19.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 55100 ft2
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft' gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 58164 ft3
h. current herd # 735 certified herd #1 1760
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 3/7/2014
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
24290 ft'
®ft3
32141.7 ft3
70352 gallons
2.50 Ibs/1000 gal.
175.9 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

ao,3o\ 51cn
M
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 31-66
County: Duplin
Facility Name: Charles Edwards Jr /Cedar Lane Farm
Certified Operator Name: Charles Edwards Jr Operator Number:
24120
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Namell D:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
CE1 CE2
N N
19 17
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 7/6/2013
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Charles Edwards Jr
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Phone: [phone]
Date: 7/1/2013
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)

11. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM
STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: CE2
line m =
970.7 ib PAN
2.
Structure ID: CE1
fine m =
293.6 lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
fine m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb, PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+g= 1264.31bPAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining iRR-
2 PAN balance
(lblacre)
t TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (Ibs.)
column r x s
u_ application window
70870
1
Bermuda/Muta
6.20
195.00
1209.0
9/1-8/31
70870
1A
Bermuda/Muta
1.70
335.00
569.5
9/1--8/31
70870
2
Bermuda/Muta
6.20
205.05
1271.3
9/1-8/31
70870
3
Bermuda/Muta
4.67
162.99
761.2
9/1-8/31
70870
4
Bermuda/Muta
6.20
218.40
1354.1
9/1--8/31
70870
5
Bermuda/Muta
4.93
191.28
943.0
9/1--8131
70870
5A
Bermuda/Muta
1.35
335.00
452.3
9/1-8/31
70870
6
Bermuda/Muta
1.95
255.78
498.8
9/1-8131
70870
6A
Bermuda/Muta
1.55
335.00
519.3
9/1-8/31
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column Q = 7578.3 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 1264.3 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = 7578.3 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -6314 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. if animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation to begin as conditions permit. Approximate Rainfall total at this farm for past ten days 12.Oin +/-
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

• 1.
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/identifier (ID): ICE2
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 17.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 2.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 103600 ft2
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallonslft3 129155 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 116047 ft3
h. current herd # 3400 certified herd # 3520
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
1. current waste analysis dated 5/16/2013
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
112091 ff3
0ft3
60433.3 ft3
215080 gallons
2.82 Ibs/1000 gal.
970.7 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure NamelIdentifier (ID): ICE1
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 19.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 55100 ftx
e, line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3 gallons
3. Projected -volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 58164 ft3
h. current herd # 1600 certified herd # 17fi0
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 5/16/2013
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
52876 ft3
®ft3
32141.7 ft3
105989 gallons
2.77 Ibs11000 gal.
293.6 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

M
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number
31-66
County: Duplin
Facility Name: Charles Edwards Jr /Cedar Lane Farm
Certified Operator Name: Charles Edwards Jr Operator Number:
24120
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
CE1 CE2
N N
18 17
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations_ Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
`Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 11/30/2009
I hereby certify that 1 have reviewed the inforrrwtion listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the inforradon is
accurate and correct.
Charles Edwards Jr Phone:
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date:
Facility Owner/Manager (signatu
910-29&5421
11/24/2009

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure ID: CE2
line m =
929A lb PAN
2. Structure ID: CE1
line m =
378.9 lb PAN
3. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n. lined + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 1308.3 lb PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
O. tract #
p. field #
Q- aw
r. acres
s.,wiwi 0 g IRR-
2 PAN heianoa
(�taae)
L TOTAL PAW
BALANCE FOR
F113M MS.)
aodsTo r x i
u. application window'
70870
1
Bertnuda/Muta
6.20
315.50
1956.1
9/1-,W31
70870
1 A
Bermuda/Muta
1.70
335.00
569.5
9/1-401
70870
2
Bermuda/Muta
6.20
316.50
1962.3
911--8131
70870
3
Bermuda/Muta
4.67
278.30
1299.7
9/1---8/31
70870
4
Berrnuda/Muta
6.20
270.90
1679.8
9/1--W1
70870
5
Bermuda/Muta
4.93
306.00
1508.6
9/1--8/31
70870
5A
Bermuda/Muta
1.35
314.00
423.9
9/1--8/31
70870
6
Ber mudalMuta
1.95
321.20
626.3
9/1- 3/31
70870
6A
Bermuda/Muta
1-55
316.70
490.9
9/1-Ml
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 10516.8 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (fine n from section 11) = 1306.3 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00

M1
x. Crops remaining PAN Balance (line v from section Illy = 10516.8 lb. PAN
V. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -9209 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list courage of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
Irrigation to begin as conditions permit.
Waste sample used is highest during the past year due to current samples not bbeing available.
PoA (30 Day) M1100

PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Nametidentifier (ID): CE1
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yrJ24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.0 inches
b. designed 25 yrJ24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (nches in red zone) = 1.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 55100 ftz
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/le 34346 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 58164 ft3
h. current herd # 1600 certified herd # 1760
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 52876 ft'
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i +i7 x 7.48 x 30 daystline f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
1. current waste analysis dated "219l2009'
m. ((lines e + ku1000) x line 1=
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
©ft3
32141.7 ft'
105989 gallons
2.70 Ibs11000 gal.
378.9 lbs. PAN

PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
1. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/identifier (iD): CFS
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 17.0 inches
b. designed 25 yrJ24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 2.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 103600 ft
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons1W 129155 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 116047 ft3
h. current herd # 3400 certified herd # 3520
actual waste produced = current heal # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + l) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated '2/9/2009•
m. ((lines e + k)/1 OW) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00
112091 fts
®ft3
fi0433.3 ft3
215080 gallons
2.70 Ibs/1000 gal.
929.4 lbs. PAN

N=
.z
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number. 31-66`: County: Duplin
Facility Name: Charles Edwards Jr /Cedar Lane Farm
Certified Operator Name: Charles Edwards Jr Operator Number. 24120
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways, and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoons Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
CE2
N
18
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of -waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
"Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
"if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 11/23/2009
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the hest of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct
Charles Edwards Jr Phone:
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date:
Facility Owner/Manager (signatu
910-298-5421
11 /16/2009

f'.
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): ICE2 71
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18 0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm. & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 103600 ft2
e_ line cJ12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft' 64577 gallons
3_ Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 949471 ft3
h. current herd # 340Q certified herd # 352Q
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 9171 D ft'
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 daystline f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated '219/2009'
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00
® ft3
20fiO3 fl3
140017 gallons
2.70 lbs/1000 gal.
562.4 lbs. PAN

r.
11. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM
STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: CE2
line m = 552.4 Ib PAN
2.
Structure 1D:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4_
Structure ID:
line m =.
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 552.4lbPAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD_ DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR-
2 PAN:balance
(Wacre)
L TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD jibs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
70870
1
Bermuda/Meta
6.20
315.50
1956.1
911--8131
708701
1A
BermudalMuta
1.70
335.00
569.5
9/1-8/31
70870
2
Bermuda/Muta
6.20
316.50
1962.3
9/1-8/31
70870
3
BermudalMuta
4.67
278.30
1299.7
911-8/31,
70870
4
Bermuda/Muta
6.20
270.90
1679.6
9/1--8/31
70870
5
Bermuda/Muta
4.93
306.00
1508.6
911--8/31
70870
5A
Bermuda/Muta
1.35
314.00
423.9
9/1--8/31
70870
6
Bermuda/Muta
1.95
321.20
626.3
911--8/31
70870
6A
Ber►nuda/Muta
1.55
316.70
490.9
9/1-8/31
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
,eceiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 10516.8 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section it) = 552.4 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) = 10516.8 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -9964 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. if animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation to begin as conditions permit.
Waste sample used is highest during the past year due to current samples not bbeing available.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00

Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Curtis Barwick
Coharie Farms
300 Westover Road
Clinton, NC 28328
Dear Mr. Barwick:
AN ww�l
Q;=��
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
March 11, 2009
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Coharie Farms
Animal Waste Management System
The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge surveys information for many of
your farms on March 4, 2009. With the survey results, you requested an extension of the sludge
survey requirement for the lagoons at those facilities. Based on the amounts of treatment volume
available, the Division feels that sludge survey requirement exemption is appropriate for the
lagoons that are listed on the attached table for the specified period of time. Please pay particular
attention to the number of years a lagoon is exempt from sludge survey requirement.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. if you have any questions, please call me at (919) 715-
693 7.
Sincerely,
7114�
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
Attachment: Extension List
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section MAR.i ZD�
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section JBY.
Washington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Central Files
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX 1: 919-715-0588 FAX 2: 919-715-60481 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Inlemet: www.ncwaterquatity.org
An Equal Opportunity i Affirmative Action Empioyer
Nne
orthCarolina
Aaturallrf

t,
COHARIE FARMS SLUDGE SURVEY EXEMPTIONS APPROVAL
1
March 11, 2009
NO.
FARM NO.
OWNER NAME
FARM NAME
COUNTY
REGIONAL
OFFICE
LAGOON ID
EXTENSION
APPROVED UNTIL
YEAR
1
1 AWS310066
Charles Edwards
Cedar Lane Farm
Duplin
Wilmington
Big & Small Lagoons
12/31/2011
2
AWS310395
Christopher Heath
C & S Farm
Duplin
Wilmington
i L#1 & L#2
12/31/2012
3
AWS310792
Michael Hunter
Hunter Farm
Duplin
Wilmington
1
12/31/2011
4
AWS40001 1
Brown Marsh Farms LLC
Dirt Road Farm
Greene
Washington
BI & C1
12/31/2010
5
AWS400011
Brown Marsh Farms LLC
Dirt Road Farm
Greene
Washington
C2
t2/3 t/2012
6
AWS400037
Marlowe Farm LLC
Little Creek Hog_ Farm
Greene
Washington
L#2 only
12/3 1/20 10
7
AWS510041
Whitley Stephenson
Spring_ Meadow Farm
Johnston
Raleigh
L#3 only
12/31/2010
8
AWS510055
Tracy Denning
T & S Denning farm
Johnston
Raleigh
1
12/31/2012
9
AW1670053
Coharie Hog Farms
Coharie Farms C-11
Onslow
Wilmington
1
12/31/2012
10
AWS820037
James Herring
James Herring Farm
Sampson
Fayetteville
L#1
12/31/2012
11
AWS820072
ADJ Farms Inc
ADJ Hog Farm3-5
Sampson
Fayetteville
L#2 only
12/31/2010
12
AWS820074
Linoard Howard
Linoard Howard & Son
Sampson
Fayetteville
L#1
12/31/2011
13
AWS820161
Arthur Naylor
Arthur Lee Naylor
Sampson
Fayetteville
Finishing & Nursery_
12/31/2012
14
AWS820175
Jay Sullivan
Jay Sullivan Farm
Sampson
Fayetteville
L#1
12/31/2012
15
AWS820315
Bobcat Farms LLC
Bobcat Farm
Sampson
Fayetteville
L#2 only
12/31/2012
16
AWS820406
Coharie Hog Fann
Coharie Farms CA
Sampson
Fayetteville
1
12/31/2011
17
AWS820494
Coharie Hog Farm
Coharie Farms New Nursery
Sampson
Fayetteville
1
12/31/2012
18
AWS820516
'Thomas Howard
Thomas Howard & Sons Farms
Sampson
Fayetteville
L#1 only
12/31/2012
19
AWS820529
Ronald Davis
Davis Nursery
Sampson
Fayetteville
L#I & L#2
12/31/2010
20
AWS820586
F.J. Faison
Sonny Gold/ Sonny Swine
Sampson
Fayetteville
Sonny#1 only
12/31/2012
21
AWS820624
Carlton Barefoot
Sinclair Sow Farm
Sampson
Fayetteville
1
12/31/2012
22
AWS820677
Joel Parker Farms Inc
Running; Branch #1
Sampson
Fayetteville
1
12/31/2011
23
AWS820725
Coharie Hog Farms
Coharie Farms C-7
Sampson
Fayetteville
1
12/31/2012
24
AWS960138
Carroll Grady
Carroll Grady Farm A, B, & C
Wayne
Washington
Lagoon C only
12/31/2012
25
AWS960161
Charles McClenny
4M Hog Farm Inc
Wayne
Washington
1 1
12/31/2010
3/11/2009 mdg

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Dep"ment of Environment and Natural Resources
Coieen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 1, 2007 'CEIVED
Charles Edwards RE
Cedar Lane Farm
507 Cedar Fork Church Rd JUN 2 6 2007
Beulaville, NC 28518
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AW S310066
Cedar Lane Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Duplin County
Dear Charles Edwards:
In accordance with your application received on 5-Jan-07, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Charles Edwards, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Cedar Lane Farm, located in Duplin County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 5280 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to -Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition 111.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals .authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay
careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring_ conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Internet: www.ncwatMuality.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recyded110% Post Consumer Paper
Nam` Carolina
Naturall#
Telephone: [phone]
Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
v.J
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0111(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS, 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit -after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection staff may be reached at 910-395-3900. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at (919) 733-
3221.
Sincerely,
Per
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County Health Department
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AW S310066

Ow
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 31-66
County: Duplin
Facility Name: Cedar Lane Farm
Certified Operator Name: Charles W Edwads Ji Operator Number:
24120
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
2
N N
17 16
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 9/8/2006
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Charles Edwards Jr Phone: [phone]
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date: 9/6/2006
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)

RECEIVED
SEP 13 2006
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 31-66
Facility Name
Cedar Lane Farm
County: Du lin
Certified Operator Name: Charles W Edwads Ji Operator Number:
24120
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name11D:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
1 2
N N
17 16
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
9/8/2006
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Charles Edwards Jr
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Phone:
Date:
Facility Owner/Manager (si ature)
910 298-5421
9/6/2006

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: 1
line rn =
558.1 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID_ 2
line m =
227.6 lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 785.8lbPAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD_ DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT RF APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD_
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(lblacre)
t TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
70870
1
coastallmatua
620
360.00
2232.0
Sep -Aug_
70870
1A
coastallmatua
1.74
360.00
626.4
Sep -Aug
70870
2
coastallmatua
6.20
360.00
2232.0
Se Au
70870
3
coastal/matua
4.67
360.00
1681.2
Sep -Aug
70870
4
coastallmatua
6.20
360.00
2232.0
Sep -Aug
70870
5
coastallmatua
4.93
360.00
1774.8
Sep -Aug
70870
5A
coastallmatua
1.35
360.00
486.0
Sep -Aug
70870
6
coastalmatua
1.95
360.00
702.0
Sep -Aug
70870
6A
coastallmatua
1.55
360.00
558.0
Sep -Aug
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column Q = 12524.4 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 785.8 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121100

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) _ 12524.4 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -11739 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land
available for pumping if needed.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
1. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelidentifier (ID): 1
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) =
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f, temporary storage period according to structural design
16.0 inches
19.5 inches
3.5 inches
95944 ft2
209318 gallons
180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 116047 ft3
h. current herd #7-35-20-1 certified herd # 3520
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 116047 ft3
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i +j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 9/1/2006
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
®ft3
60433 ft3
220012 gallons
1.30 Ibs11000 gal.
558.1 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/identifier (ID): 12
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone)
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/W
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f, temporary storage period according to structural design
17.0 inches
i 9.5 inches
2.5 inches
49484 ft2
77113 gallons
180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 58i64 ft3
h. current herd # 1 17601 certified herd #1 1760
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 58164 fts
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 9/1/2006
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
�ft3
32141.7 W
112581 gallons
1.201bs11000 gal.
227.6 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
NOV 2 9 2006
Facility Number: County: Du lin----
Facility Name: Cedar Lane Farm
Certified Operator Name: Charles W Edwads Ji Operator Number: 24120
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon Name/lD: 1 2
Spillway(Y or N): N N
Level(inches): 18 16
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP. '
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
11126/2006
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Charles Edwards Jr Phone
Facility OwnedManager (print)
Date:
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
910 298-5421
11 /26/2006

11. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: 1
line m =
210.6 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID: 2
line m =
92.6 lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 303.2 lb PAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining 1RR
2 PAN balance
(lb/acre)
t TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
70870
1
coastal/matua
6.20
300.00
1860.0
Se Au
70870
1A
coastal/matua
1.74
300.00
522.0
Sep -Aug
70870
2
coastal/matua
6.20
300.00
1860.0
Sep -Aug
70870
3
coastal/matua
4.67
300.00
1401.0
Sep -Aug
70870
4
coastal/matua
6.20
300.00
1860.0
Sep -Aug
70870
5
coastal/matua
4.93
300.00
1479.0
Sep -Aug
70870
5A
coastal/matua
1.35
300.00
405.0
Se Au
70870
6
coastal/matua
1.95
300.00
585.0
Se Au
70870
6A
coastal/matua
1.55
300.00
465.0
Sep -Aug
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 10437.0 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S POA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 303.2 Ib. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section Ill) _ 10437.0 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -10134 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
[mceiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
PoA (30 Day) 2121 /00

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): 11
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.5 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1.5 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
. (area at below structural freeboard elevation) 95944 ftz
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3 89708 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 116047 ft3
h. current herd # 3520 certified herd #1 3520
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i +j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 11/14/2006
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
116047 ft'
® ft3
60433 ft3
220012 gallons
0.68 Ibs/1000 gal.
210.6 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): 12
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 16.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.5 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 3.5 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 49484 ftz
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallonslft'' 107958 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 58164 W
h. current herd # 1760 certified herd # 1760
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 11/14/2006
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
58164 ft'
�fe
32141.7 W
112581 gallons
0.42 Ibs/1000 gal.
92.6 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

ANIMAL FACILITY .A_NNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number .ii` ,�� :f ) ! 0- County v,0 AA _ Year 200
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) tea/ f yl�
Operator in Charge for this Facility r`er <c S L5—i Certification f :,
Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year
_ X YES NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part II and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste
was Generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled_
Part I : Facility Information:
1. Total number of application Fields ❑ or Pulls ❑ (please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): 'f _ Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
'%- 22
2. Total number of Fields ❑ or Pulls ❑ (please check the appropriate box) on which land application
occurred during the year: Total Acres on which waste was appliedy _ r
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWIVIP and
the permit:
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or'given-to other persons and, taken
off site during the year a tons ❑ or gallons ❑ (please check the appropriate box)
6. Annual average number berco/f animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
;
7. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year:
Largest Ale
Smallest 3 9,33
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals
at the facility is the annual average numbers)
8. Facility's Integrator if applicable:
Part H: Facility Status:
C
IF THE ANSWER -TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during 0 Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
AFACF 3-14-03

2. The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from
Yes ❑ No
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
,
the past calendar year.
3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past
Yes ❑ No
calendar year.
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during
Yes ❑ No
the .past calendar year. ... .
5. There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the
Yes ❑ No
levels specified in this facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year.
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year.
M Yes ❑ No
7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon
Yes ❑ No
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume
for which the lagoon was designed.
8. A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification.
M Yes ❑ No
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the
@ Yes ❑ No
past calendar year.
10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year?
Yes []No
11. All required monitoring and reporting -was performed in accordance with the facility's
® Yes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during
A Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
13. Crops as specified in the CAWNM were maintained during the past calendar year on all
FI Yes ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were
® Yes ❑ No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year_ I -
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
,!�! ec T l rs
Permittee Name
ignature of
G/v: IC4C rA rill
e (type or pant
Signature of Operator in Charge
(if different from Permittee)
AFACF 3-14-03 2
Date
Date

Appendix: 3. Lagoon Sludge Survey Form
A. Farm Permit or DWQ Idenrincation Number F� a✓'
E. Laeoon Identification
C. Person(s) taking Measurements
D. Date of Measurements
E. Merhods.'Devices Used for Measur;mem of:
a. Distance from the laeoor liquid stL.ace to the top of the sfiu�dge lave:
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid stn:ace to the bottom (soil) of lagoon:
C. Thickness of the sludge laver if malting a direct measurement with `core sampler":
Laeoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): 24 (acres)
(Draw- sketch of laeoon on a separate sheet and list dimensions, and calculate surface area_)
G.
Estimate number of sarrtpling points:
a. Less than 1.33 acre: Use 8 points
b. If more than 1.33 acre_ _.?, a Y' acres x b = with maximum of 24.
(Using sketch and dimensions, develop a uniform "grid" th4 has number of intersection points that match
most cioseiy with the estimated number of sampling points needed. Number- the grid intersection points on
the lagoon grid to correspond with the data to oc recorded for points of measurrm=L)
H.
Conduct sludge survey and retard data an "Sludge Survey Data Sheet"_
I.
At time of sludsesurvey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level
to the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gage pole):
J.
Determine distance from Maximum Liquid Level to Muumuu Liquid Level:
f b
(Determine front Plan or other lagoon mcotvsi
Y_
Calculate distance from present liquid surface level to Minimum Liquid
level: Item .I — Item 1, assuming present liquid level is belowMax. Lio. Level:
Q
: 9
L .
Record from sludee survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the laeoon bottom (average for all the me:suremcm points):
M_
Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the too or the sludge laver [average for all the measurement points.!:
. Z
N.
Record from sludge sw-,,ev data sheet the average thickness ofthe sludee iaye;:
�7
0.
Calculate the thickness of the existing_ Liquid ': reatrnent Eone (Item N1— Item 1;'):
(Tote: If Item 0 is less than 4 E. a sludge removal and utilization plan mad be 7tUuired b%
N. C. DW9. Sec Your specitic pzrmit w contact DWQ for more information.)
P.
Proceed to Sludge '.'alume %Vc.-kShte' ii d-2Sl'2 to caiculate, sludee voitu-nt fo: r ctangular
shaped
with uttifo,;,. side slor+e.
n.':
I/
ample,
rLJ� Date—,4
°tint Name �tcrta..tre
11

Appendix 4_ Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Lagoon identification:
Sludge Survey Data Sheet C f-GL G�
Completed by: L,r � -�.1+� Date:'�'
Print Name Signature
(A)
Grid
Point
No.
(B) (C)
}
Ij
Distance from liquid surface, Distance from liquid surface
to too of sludge to lagoon bottom (sail)
P -(a)
'thickness of sludge
laver
Ft. _& inches IFeet (tenths) IFt. & inches
Feet (tenths)
JR & inches [Feet (tenths'
3
I Y I
a
I I 32
4
i �iY I
.�
5
i { E I
73
T!
7
I I.4 I
I , o.
I J.
I s
I I 5� r_
-7.
I--
2"0 I
19
_
1 I- f - -I
g D
I --
I- -3. 1
10 J
.
I 11
I
12
13
I I I
I 7. 9
14
I I s.- I 1 Y I I .2
1617
I I I
I
I I
18
I ? I
I
19
20
I f
22
23
24
IAveraae
! r
-7 ! �� ' 1. Ib i
*All Grid Points and corres ondina sludge laver ihicVness must be shown on a sketch
attached to this Sludge Survey Data Sheet.
See .-kpnendix 6 for conversion from inches to tenths.of feet.
E

Appendix: 3. - Lagoon Sludge Survey- Form F
A. Faun Permit or DWQ Identification Number {.► �� �31 "(
E. Lagoon Identification _ _ p 'Z (5-..: jo
C. Person(s) taking Measurem-nts
D. Date of Measurements
E. Merhods., Devic:s Used for M2asur;.meni of:
a. Distance from the lagoon liouid mnace to the top of the siudrye laver.
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surace to the bottom of lagoon:
c. Thickness of the sludge laver if mal:.ing a direct measurements w th "core sample.-":
F Laeoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of hank): I %/ (acres)
(Draw sketch of lagoon on a separate sheet and list dimensions, and caiculate surface area.)
G. Estimate number of sampling points:
a_ Less than 1.33 acre: Ds- S points Q�
b. if more than 1.33 acre. acres x 6 = v With maximum of _'4.
(Using sket_h and dimensions, d--veiop a uniform "grid" the: has numbs of intersection points that match
most ciosei_: with the estimated number of sampling points needed. Numberthe grid int=ection points on
the lagoon grid to correspond with the data to be recorded for points of measuremattt.)
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data She-t".
I. At time of sludeesurvey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level
to the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gage pole):
7. Determine distance from Maximum Liquid Level to Minimum Liquid Level: -19
(Determine from Plan or other iaeoon records)
K. Calculate distance from present liquid surface level to Minimum Liquid
level: Item 3 — Item I, assuming present liouid level is below Max. Lio. Level:
L: Record from siudee survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points):
M. Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the top or the sludge layer.(averaae for all the measurement Mints): 7
N. Record from siudee survev dam sheet the average thickness of the sludge laver. Z
Q. Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone iltem N1 — Item ic):
{Vote: if hear: 0 is less than '. ; .. sludge ramovai and utiitzation plan -nay be required by
N. C. DWQ. 5ce Your 5pecu3c permit or contact DWQ for more informatior.. )
P. Proceed to Sludge -..--olume W07 shee. F desir_ to cZicuiate sludge voiurne fo- re :angular ;ihaped
aeaon with uniform., side sioce. /
Compie- ._e%. Al_* c't.l. i, � L Date, " f"
a.^nc i-an an,=
0

Appendix 4. -Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Lagoon Identification.
Sludge Survey Data Sheet +!2
Comoieted by: t_,wIrt C ,,� 4 Date:
Print Name Signature
Grid
Point
No.
(B) i (C)
Distance from liquid surface, Distance from liquid surface
to top of sludge i to lagoon bottom (soil)
(C) - (B) !
Thickness of sludge i
laver
Ft. & inches IFeet (tenths) IFt. & inches
Feet (tenths)
Ft. &inches (Feet (tenths) !
1
I J/ I
.
2
71
I I .2. 3
3
I ! o!7
:2
a
.2
5
I !71
3.3
s
l I 3.fI
I '7
1,3
7
8 I I7
G I I .2.1
s 1 I
I I
10 I
I !
I 11
! I
I
I
12
I I
I !
13 I f ! I
I !
14
15 I ! ! I
I
1
15 1
17 I !
!
18 I !
14 i
i 20
I I
I 21
22
i
7a
Lerwel 7 /, 2LI
*All Grid Points and corres- ondingy sludge laver thickness must be shown on a sketch
attached to this Sludge Survey Data Sheet.
See .�pnendix 6 for conversion from inches to tenths of feet_

r
4- C".k--' 3/-JL
1-919-735-1651
1-$00-672-3106
1-919-735-9946 FAX

V.
�.J v
ANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number NC/9_2310tt County VA I „ Year 200_L
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) CAa,,jdj &4e'a,5Z T, — ced.,-
Operator in Charge for this Facility Cti�Jet W. Fmdwu" ,J r Certification 9 24 I Z o
Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year
YES .. NO.' If NO, skip Part I and Part U and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste
was generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
Part I: Facility Information:
1. Total number of application Fields 0 or Pulls �?(please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): q Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
�,3
2. Total number of Fields ❑ or Pulls Et/(please check the appropriate box) on which land application
occurred during the year: 2 Total Acres on which waste was applied3*.23
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
_F 9 61. N
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CA'�N'MP and
the permit: 19-1_1 Lt
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons'and taken
off site during the year � C p tons 01 or gallons � (please check the appropriate box)
5. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous rear:
49J I -L MO,+A Ave.-a:1
7. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year:
Largest 61 C1 Y"o^4-1 n,.
jt
Smallest 3+4 b q MJ�1-%'�t_ to w
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals at
the facility is the annual average numbers)
8. Facilitv's Integrator if applicable: !'.�;/,_12 ,!j — Rrcw,n /.�C
Part H: Facility Status:
W THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO". PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT. THE DATES OF ANY
NON COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE
TAKEN TO BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
Only animal waste venerated at this facility_ was applied to the permitted sites during '.Sees ❑ No
the past calendar year. eCEI\JED
AFACF 3-14-03
F E� j J��k
P

2.
The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from
IZ;;-Yes ❑ No
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year.
3.
There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past
L ✓Yes ❑ No
calendar year.
4.
There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during
! 1 Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
5.
There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the
E�'Yes ❑ No
levels specified in this facility's CAWIVIP during the past calendar year.
6.
All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year.
[ Yes C�No
7.
Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the Iagoon
❑ Yes a No
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume
for which the lagoon was designed.
8.
A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey_ Form for this facility is attached to this Certification. ❑
Yes
No
9.
Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the
Yes ❑ No
past calendar year.
10.
Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year?
7-Yes ❑ No
11.
All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's
Cam' Yes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the pern it were complied with during ! es 0 No
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
1I Crops as specified in the CAWIMP were maintained during the past calendar year on all �! Yes ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were -?'Yes No
.maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is. to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitIing false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
- lr_ AC% rf es W. Ed w,% -cIt Sr• -
Permittee Name and Title (type or print)
Signature of Pern-ittee
Signature of Operator in Charge
(if different from Permittee)
Date
Date
AFACF 3-14-03 2

February 23' 2004
NC Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
161.7 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Sir or Madam:
For my Animal Facility Annual Certification Form for calendar year 2003, I submit
the following:
For Part II, Questions 6,7 and 8; my permit states I have one year after receipt
of the permit to perform the calibration and sludge survey. I affirm that these
items will be performed before April 24`h, 2004.
For Part II, Question 4 Freeboard Violation, I notified DWQ on March 23'd of
high freeboard and it was handled appropriately. Check DWQ records.
Thank you for your attention and cooperation reharding this matter.
Sincerely, Z,.r

�F W A 7-69 Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
August 7, 2003
Charles Edwards, Jr.
507 Cedar Fork Church Road
Beulaville, NC 28518
Subject: Rescission of Notice of Violation /
Issuance of Notice of Deficiency
Cedar Lane Farm
Facility # 31-66
Duplin County
Dear Charles Edwards, Jr.:
Thank you for your recent submittal of the information requested in our letter dated April 15,
2003. We greatly appreciate the effort that you made in compiling this information and sending
it to our Wilmington Regional Office by the date required. We also appreciate the fact that you
reported the problem with high freeboard to our staff as required by your permit and worked with
our staff to manage the problem once it occurred.
Upon review and consideration of the information submitted, the Wilmington Regional Office has
determined that no further compliance/enforcement actions will be taken by the Division for
these high freeboards.
Also, based on your actions to properly operate your facility, the Division of Water Quality
hereby rescinds the Notice of Violation that was issued to you on April 15, 2003 and replaces it
with this Notice of Deficiency.
In the future, please continue to evaluate ways to maintain freeboard levels in the required range.
These methods include, but are not limited to, water conservation practices, adding additional
application sites, updating your cropping systems, adding additional and/or more flexible
application equipment, and maintaining the lagoon levels at the lowest allowable and appropriate
levels throughout the year. Our staff looks forward to continuing to work with you and your
Technical Specialist to evaluate and implement any needed changes to your system.
MOW
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location:
1 800 623-7748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax: [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity ! Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled 110% post -consumer paper
http!//h2o,enr.state-nc.us

Inadequate Freeboard
Charles Edwards, Jr.
August 7, 2003
Page 2
Thank you again for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact the staff of our Wilmington Regional Office at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
CC: Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown, LLC
Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Patrick Fussell, DS WC
Wilmington Files 31-66
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Central Files

o�0� WAr��pG
Michael F. Easley
Governor
O 'C
April 16, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL.
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Charles Edwards, Jr.
507 Cedar Fork Church Road
Beulaville NC 28518
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Request for Information
Inadequate Freeboard
Cedar Lane Farm
#31-66
Duplin County
Dear Sir or Madam:
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
On March 23, 2003, a representative of your animal operation informed the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) that there was inadequate freeboard in the lagoon(s) serving this facility.
This lack of adequate freeboard is in non-compliance with the Certificate of Coverage
issued to this facility on December 2, 1997. In addition to this Notice of Violation (NOV), this
non-compliance is subject to an appropriate enforcement action by DWQ. This action can
consist of one or more of the following: a civil or criminal enforcement action; an injunction;
and/or a requirement to apply for coverage under an individual permit. The action chosen will
be based on complete evaluation of all factors that resulted in the inadequate freeboard; the
actions taken to. restore the needed freeboard; and the actions being proposed to prevent the
problem from reoccurring.
To assist us in our review, please provide the Wilmington Regional Office with an
evaluation of the reasons for the freeboard violation(s) and a strategy to prevent future freeboard
violation(s). This evaluation and strategy must include but is not limited to the following:
Current Freeboard level(s)
Freeboard level records in the lagoon(s) for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
Spraying records for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
MERR
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1.877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal OpportunityI Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% past -consumer paper
httpY1h2o.enr state.nc. us

Inadequate Freeboard
Page 2
Rainfall records for the past 12 months for this site up to the date of submittal (if
available)
Cropping system and PAN specified in the CAWMP. If the cropping system was not in
compliance with the facility's CAWMP, provide details of the cropping system in place
for the past 12 months.
A summary of actions taken to restore the needed freeboard in the lagoon(s) including but
not limited to removal of animals from the site, delay of restocking of animals, pumping
and hauling waste to another site (specify site), securing additional irrigation equipment,
and securing additional spray sites.
A description of water conservation measures in use at the facility and the date(s)
installed.
If the lagoon level(s) are still in violation of the facility's CAWMP and Permit, provide
an updated Plan of Action as to how the facility will return to compliance.
Provide a detailed description of the actions taken or proposed to be taken to insure that
there are no further freeboard violations at this facility.
This information must be received by the Wilmington Regional Office at the following
address no later than 10 days following receipt of this letter.
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-2845
Once this information is received and evaluated by the DWQ staff, a determination will
be made as to the appropriate compliance/enforcement actions to be taken. Each case will be
evaluated on its own merit. The efforts by the owner/producer to notify DWQ of the problem,
efforts made to resolve the problem once identified, and efforts proposed to prevent future
problems will be positive factors in this determination.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you either the responsibility or
liability for this non-compliance or future cases of non-compliance. If you have any questions
regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact our Wilmington Regional Office Staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.
Director
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Central Files

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
NPDES PERMIT `RENEWAL - 2007
REGIONAL OFFICE - APS
FARM NO:�
❑ ASHEVILLE
❑ FAYETTEVILLE
❑ MOORESVILLE
❑ RALEIGH
❑ WAfFI1NGTON
WILMINGTON
❑ WINSTON-SALEM
12/2912006 dgl

r_
of �
N
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Charles Edwards Jr3166
Charles Edwards, Jr
507 Cedar Fork Church Rd
Betilaville, NC 28518
910- 298-5421
05-24-2002
This plan has been developed by:
Billy W Houston
Duplin Soil & Water
PO Box 219
Kenansville, NC 28349 RECEIVED 1 DENR / DWQ
910-296-2120 AQU1FFR'PR0 TFCTJ0N SECTION
a
DEC 2 s Zoos
Deve oper Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Nlanager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenanc
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included
with this plan.
Signature (owner) T Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: 6 �y 1)-k_
Technical Specialist Signature Date
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 4,894,560 gals/year by
a 5,280 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production
facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
11280
Incorporated
19372
Injected
21334
Irrigated
12261
Actual PAN
Applied (Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
12,524
4,999,761
-105,201
------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: In source 1D, S means standard source; U means user defined source.
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Source Page 1 of 1

Narrative
This WUP is written based on a wetted acres footprint(see attached).
Mr Edwards plans to establish a Matua/Bermuda Pasture rotation(see attached Prairiegrass Management)
on the North and South sides of the path.
Bermuda Pasture Yield 4.6 x 1.6 = 7.36 x 50 = 368 lbs N/ac [ Use 360 lbs Nlac For Bermuda/Matua
Rotation]
�
U n(frr.re fl'� _T 1e- /Vc'-rk
Si'4e /14A Cv� n
z14-tr
M af�-G ram; ►t �3t �,{�I,,��
Sac +1,7�-J 71,
F-a
SrZy'o2­
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Narrative Page I of 1

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the
number of acres of cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to
be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being
supplied by manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and
liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A
balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the
utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal
waste is being utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being
applied. Soil tests should be used to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient
management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when
excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field,
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
(lbs/A)
PA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
Nutrient
Applied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Rcq'd
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
Source
Total
Use.
RYE
Applic.
Applic,
1000
"Tract
Field
In.
soil Series
Acre
Acres
Cron
RYE
Unit
Period
N
N
N
Method
Ihs/A
I/A
tons
1000 als
tons
70870
1
57
Nortblk
6.2
6.2
Hybrid
*9.6
Tons
9/1-8131
*360
0
0
[trig,
360
143.71
0
891,02
0.00
Berm./Rescuegrass OIS
Pasture
70870
IA
57
Norfolk
1.7
1.7
Hybrid
*9.6
Pons
9/1-8/31
*360
0
0
Irrig.
360
143.71
0
250.06
0.00
Berm./Rescuegrass O/S
Pasture
70870
2
S7
Norfolk
6.2
6.2
Hybrid
*9.6
Tons
9/1-8/31
*360
0
0
irrig.
360
143.71
0
891.02
0.00
Berm,/Rescuegrass O/S
Pasture
70870
3
57
Noriblk
4.7
4.7
Hybrid
*9.6
'Tons
9/1-8/31
*300
0
0
brig.
360
143.71
0
671.14
0.00
Berm./Rescuegrass Ols
Pasture
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed; 5/24/02 WUT Page 1

Wade Hiilizatien Table
Year I
Nitrogen
Conlin.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
liquid
Solid
PA
Fen,
(Ibs1A)
PA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
Nutrient
Applied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
Source
Total
Use,
RYE
Applic.
Apptic.
1000
Tract I
Field
1.1).
1 Soil'Series
Acre
Acres I
Crov
RYt:
I Unit
Period
N
N
I N
Method
I Ibs/A
aiIIA I
tons
I 1000 gals
tons
70870
4
S7
Norfolk
6.2
6.2
Hybrid
*9.6
Tons
911-8/31
*360
0
0
Irrig.
360
143.71
0
891.02
0.00
Renn./Rcscuegrass O/S
Pasture
70870
5
S7
Norfolk
4.9
4.9
Hybrid
*9.6
fans
911-8/31
*360
U
0
Irrig,
360
143.71
0
708.50
0.00
13enn.IRescuegras5 OIS
Pasture
70870
SA
S7
Norfolk
1.4
1.4
1lybrid
*9,6
Tons
911-8131
*360
0
0
Irrig.
360
143.71
0
194.01
0,00
Rernl./Rescuegrass OIS
Pasture
70870
6
S7
Norfolk
2.0
2,0
1lybrid
*9.6
Tons
9/1-8131
*360
0
0
Irrig.
360
143.71
0
280.24
0.00
Berm./Rescuegrass OIS
;'astute
70870
6A
S7
Norfolk
1.5
1.5
Hybrid
*9.6
Tons
9/1.8/31
*360
0
0
Irri.,
360
143.71
U
222,75
0.00
Bernl.lRescuegriss O/S
Pasture
40007
Marture SLI14ds
Total Applied, tons
0.00
BalallCC, tons
0.00
Notes: I. In the tract column, symbol - means ICILSed, otherwise, owned, 2. Symbol * mcans user entered data.
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed. 5/24/02 WUT page 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following
table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation
system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive
wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in
any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(incheslhour)
Application Amount
(inches)
70870
1
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
70970
IA
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
70870
2
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
70970
3
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
70870
4
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
70870
5
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
70970
5A
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
70870
6
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
70870
6A
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 [AF Page 1 of 1

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of
acres needed for sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are
based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and
the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of
the effluent. At clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at
agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including
phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray
fields should not be used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to
load effluent application fields with high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent
cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous
is a concern Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Ma.ximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
S%vine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 hu
150
13.16
66.19
132.38
19S.58
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
33.10
66.19
99.29
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
62.06
124.11
186.17
-------------------------------------------- - ---- - - --
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Sludge Page 1 of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of
storage capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage
capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of
net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage
volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to
the design storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is ,greater than
the design storage capacity, this indicates that the plan calls far the application of
nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative, the
estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the
structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the
waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Avallahle Waste Storaae cit
Source Name
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
10/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
1.49
1
2
138
I
3
164
1
4
17l
I
5
177
1
6
t80
l
7
l80
1
8
1,80
1
9
180
1
t0
l80
1
I
180
1
12
149
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Capacit}, Page I of I

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1, Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that
reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land
to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure
an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change
in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available
moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of
management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per
acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5
tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided
grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter
Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drif
from the land application field.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Specification Page 1 of 4

G. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding,
waste will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland.
When waste is applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in
North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface
waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site
during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor
and flies.
g. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste
should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching.
Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to
planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto
which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine
farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited
on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to
perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the landowner.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Specification Page 2 of 4

14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, 'or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
the fields have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed
waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on
all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.).
Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are
limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should
be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure
plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge,
pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps,1reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills.
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
2o. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal
waste is used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only
be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste
during the crop season.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Specification Page 3 of 4

21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be
tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are
applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other
restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc
and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop
sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH
shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil
and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a
minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other
waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Specification Page 4 of 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 1A, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5A, 6, 6A
Hybrid $errnudagrass/Rescuegrass Overseed: No Comment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Crop Note Page 1 of

Prairiegrass Management
Also called Rescue grass Grass and "Matua"
Introduction
Prairiegrass (also called Rescuegrass or lvtatua) is a Bromus species. It was introduced about 150
years ago from South America and can be found in pastures, hay meadows, field edges and
along roadsides in many areas. One may find that prairiegrass is classified as Bromus
cc,CRarttCZ;s, Vahl„ B. ivillder:owii, Kunth or B. ztnOloides, H.B.K. kLtua is a "narr:ed variety"
j1-:si as " Kentucky 31" is a narned variety of tall fescue and is classified as B. willderrowii. It
may sometimes be called "Grasslands Nfatua" because that is the official name given to it by the
\e%v Z:..fland Research Division of AgResearch in I973. In the 1950's there was a local selectior,
of rescuegrass named "Chapel Hill"; it was especially subject to the disease called powdery
mildew.
Identification Characteristics
Prairiegrass is a:-i erect, bunch grass that grows up to three feet tall when seed heads
(inflorescence) are present. It is a perennial, but performs much lire an annual in this
environ-ment. It will produce seedheads during each regrowth period of three to six weeks,
especially froth April through October. The seedhead is an open, drooping panicle with flat
50i�Kelt:S, enc[} cor,ia; ?g 6 to 12 florets (seeds).
The s -ea_hs are rolled in oval shape, and the leaves are flat or slightly folded; the basal leaf
shy-aths are covered w'-,h many fine hairs. Leaves are 114 to inch w; de and may be LID to 18
in-, C?es lor:Q. It has no auricles, but the ligule is long, membranous and fringed.
Possible Uses
Prair ievrass is highly palatable and may be used for grazing, hay or silaQz. Most animals (cunle.
goats, horses, sheep and wildlife) will eat it well and animal performance potential is good to
e�e:llent. IX -'hen given access to a field containing prairiegrass in mixture with fescu7.
orchard! sass, or bermudagrass cattle tend to select it over the others.
gz_-cause of lrs seasonal grow-ti`1 paiLem and response to moisture and fertility ii is useful i:'z
cropping systerns "here confinement animal wastes are land applied. It offers an alterria.tive to
it nual rvearass and cereals for winter forage, with the added advantage that it is more productive
liter into the summer than all of the winter annuals.
Prairiegrass may be gro�.vn with clovers and alfalfa, but it may become very competitive if

growth is not harvested or grazed in a timely -way.
Adaptation and Perform ance"Characteristics
Soils... Prairiegrass is best adapted to well drained coarser textured soils (sandy loam, loamy
sand, loam), however it will grow well on fine textured soils that are well drained. It is not as
productive nor competitive on poorly drained soils as on well drained soils. It does not do as well
as bahia and bermuda on droughty soils, but it is better adapted than fescue, orchardgrass or
annual rye;rass. It responds to moisture and high fertility when the stands are dense.
Seasonal growth pattern... The seasonal growth pattern for prairiegrass is somewhat similar to
tall fescue and arwuaI ryegrass with more than half of the annual yield produced in the March-
Ju Ie period. During December through February it produces slightly more than tall fescut and
annual ryegrass. Summer growth of the cool season grasses is not usually significant, but
prairiegrass s. ems to be more productive than others (such as tall fescue and orchardgrass) when
moisture is available. Summer production is not nearly as much as with bermudagrass,
crabgrass, sudangrass, millet, bluesterns, sw•itchgrass or gamagrass. Summer growth will always
produce seedheads after three to six weeks of regrowth, whereas, fescue and orchard¢rass will
r_ot have seedheads after the spring growth is harvested.
Realistic Yield Expectations... Yields ofpure stands of prairiegrass usually range from 3 to 5
tons dry matter per acre, but may be higher when dense stands are supplied with favorable
1?:oisture and nutrients. There are virrually no documented data available for realistic yields of
prairiegrass on many soils and at various N levels in North Carolina. Until further data are
collected, the following suggestions may be useful for estimating expected yields for dense
stands of prairiegrass grown alone or in mixti:re with bermuda.
Pure stands...There are very limited comparisons of pure stands of prairiegrass with other
species, especially when the prairiegrass was allowed to reseed. The data in tables 1--4 con. -pare
it %vith other cool season grasses in tests where reseeding was not allowed. Results for the first
year of each test may give an indication of haw it would perform with 5ull stands; second and
triird year results were poor because stands always thinned in absence of reseeding. %1,7han
estimating pote;:tial RYE for pure stands of prairiegrass consider the following corn: oarisons
tall fescue:
A. On soils where both fescue and prairiegrass are well adapted, the vitIds of prairiegrass
may be I to 1.5 times more than fescue ~
B. On sand%, well drained, to excessively drained soils, prairiegrass may yield 1.5 to 3 tirr:es
more that tall fescue.
C. On wet or poorly drained soils, prairiegrass may yield .75 to 1.0 times as much as fescue.
Mixed stands with bermudaarass.. Prairiegrass makes more than half its annual growth in
March -June and another 15-25% during the Se; tember-December period, whereas benP+.uda
makes Most of its growth in June -August. Therefore these species will compete for nutrients and
light during the months of overlap, and management during those periods can shift the botanical
a 11.:9Lr::-r!4::.3 _caa W?o

composition significantly.
The annual yield of this mixture (prairiegrass-bermuda) growing on adapted soils will not be
additive of each species grown alone. However, a general guide is that the mixture will likely
yield 1.3 to 1.6 times as much as bermuda grown alone; this means yields of well maintained
mixtures may range from 4 to 8 tons/acre on productive soils receiving adequate moisture and
timely harvest management.
Nutrient composition.. The nutritive value of the forage is strongly related to prior fertilization
and the age or stage of growth at time of harvest or grazing. When harvested at vegetative to
early heading stage of growth the protein content of prairiegrass may range from 12 to 18 % and
the TDv may range from 60 to 72 %. The nutritive value of prairie?rass sterns/seedheads tends
to decline slightly slower than other cool season grasses, but very mature plants may contain less
than 10% protein and 55% TDv.
When grown with bermudagrass, the composition, of the mixture will be somewhat Iess due to
the relatively lower nutritive value of the bermudagrass component.
Disease... Prairiegrass will often (most every spring) be infected with a disease called powdery
mildew. To minimize the impact of this disease, it is best to immediate[y mow or graze the
affected growth to a 3 to 4 inch stubble. Often the mildew is more pronounced on "old"
vegetation, therefore mowing or grazing schedules may have to be modified to address the
problem.. There are no pesticides registered in the USA to control this disease on forage crops.
Establishment
Planting dates.. The optimum time to plant is September -October, but its possible to get
stands (with rriore risk) in November and March. Planting on prepared seedbed in early
September'Will ttsuatty r--sCl[t in more fall growth, however seedlings ca: be stressed and killed
when moisture is severely limiting. If planting into bermudagrass sod, consideration has to be
made for the competitior from the existing bermuda. Even though bermuda may not be growir:g
raoidly during September, the evapotranspiration rate can mean limsting of soil moisture for'
young seedlings. To minimize this effect, one can plant in October when bermuda is not very
competitive. It is possible to plant into bermuda sod in September if moisture is not limiting or if
bermirda too gro%tith is killed with a contact herbicide like Grannoxone.
Planting depth... Prairiegrass establishment is very sensitive to planting depth (optimum is 1/4.
to `,'-_ inch). tilany thin and poor stands have been caused by planting too deep.
Planting method... Establishment may be obtained by planting into a completely prepared
seedbed or by no -till planting into closely clipped or grazed sod. Drilling seeds to proper depth
improves the odds of obtaining good stands. However, broadcast seeding onto completely
prepared seedbed, followed by rolling with a cultipacker has given satisfactory stands. Seedling
development and early growth rates will be better from prepared seedbeds than from no -till
Planting into sod, especially bermudagrass sod.
D'Dur�QO,.J.cfln'Acscscy:m n g'-CCO w'7

When planting into sod, it is essential that the existing sod be short (less than 3-inches) with very
little surface "thatch" which prevents seed contact with the soil. If sod planting into actively
growinc, bermuda it will be necessary to "temporarily stunt" the bermuda with a herbicide or
light cultivation as a -way to reduce competition for light and moisture. Be aware that this option
adds a level of risk into the survival of the bermuda, especially if late summer N and K
managernent are out of balance or an insect outbreak occurs. Planting in October or after the
bermuda has been "frosted" will mean very little growth of prairiegrass before spring.
Planting rates... seeds are large (about 35,000-50,000 seeds/lb), compared to tall fescue or
rvegrass (275,000-250,000) and seedling vigor is not proportionally better. Plant 30-35 lbs
when drilling, but 35-40 when broadcasting on surface and roiling. As with any species, if
conditions (planting date, soil contact, depth, moisture) are not optimum, consider increasing
seeding rates up to 50 percent.
Volunteer reseeding... Even though prairiegrass is considered a "perennial" it practically
performs as an annual. To maintain productive stands for several years it will be necessary to
manage of least one arowth cycle each year for seed production and shatter. Seed -set may be
encouraged anytime from May through August, however mid-sutnmer seed production tends to
m n;,nize the arnoura of loss in forage quality/yield since it is a time when the plant naiurally
makes less foliage growth; plenty of seed should be produced in June -July. Obtaining successful
Volunteer stands will depend on seed viability and control of competition from other established
Grasses during the September through October period. Germinating seeds and developing
seed! ings will need to receive sunlight and moisture to survive. If prairiegrass is being Grown on
bertTudagrass it will be necessary to graze or mow the bermuda closely in early September.
There will be an advantage to lightly disturbing the soil surface to provide some soil to seed
Contact to many Years.
Fertilization
.'lane people have said that 700 to 300 lbs of Nitrogen can be taken up by "ivlatua"; uptake and
plant survival of such rates are only part of the story. It is true that the grass tray survive such
r17es, bW C"Op UpMke c.nd efficiency of Nitrogen recovery are strongly related to dry ma?er
-ields of any crop. W-hen considering a realistic yield that can be expected in this environment
and r,.anage=nen=. scheme, it is likely that such rates would result in significant losses of N to the
.nvir, )cL-en:. There is no controlled and documented evidence that shows it is practical to apply
c=� rates to an; crop in '--,,C nor elsewhere. Even in controlled greenhouse trials, the N recov-zr,•-
efficiencies drop significantly when N applications were above 250 to 400 lbs/acre;'year.
PrairieQrass, like most other cool season grasses will perform best when pH is above 5.0 and P
and K index are mediurn or better. The P and K composition in tissue is similar to other grasses,
however when high rates are being applied to land, all grasses will take up "luxury" amounts of
h: K composition is usually similar to N composition in most forage grasses.
Accor,:ling to reports from Pennsylvania prairiegrass may contain lower levels of ce La=.n trace
e!ernents sllCII as magnes[um and iodine than other cool season grasses.
O'p,;aaCOiC-LaC'dlmg '!ZCOW?o 4

Pure Stands ...prairiegrass responds to high fertility, especially when moisture is available.
However, its Nitrogen composition may be more similar to ryegrass than tall fescue or
orchardarass; this means that it may contain about 45 to 55 lbs N/ton dry- matter, depending on
timing of fertilizer applications, age or stage of plant growth and presence of powdery mildew
disease. It should receive most of its N during the September -October and late February through
May months. Consider the following N management for dense pure stands:
A. At establishment of the prairiegrass (fall planting) apply between 60-75 lbs
N/acre.
B. On established stands of prairiegrass and ones that have resel-ded satisfactorily,
apply about 75-100 lbs ofN/acre during the September through November period;
it would be best to apply most of the N early in this season (September -early
October) and hold the amount applied in November to below 50 lbs/acre.
C. During December and January do not apply any N, unless there was none or very
little applied during the September through November period, then consider
applying less than 20 lbs/acre .
D. ' During the February through May period apply no more than 60-75 lbs N per
application and no more than this amount during any 30 day period. It would be
best to apply less than the 60 lbs/acre in February, unless plants are showing signs
of dericieney or growing conditions are favorable for rapid plant arowTh.
E. During the June through August period prairiegrass may continue growing if
moisture is available. Durina these "off months", prairiegrass should not receive
more than about 25 lbs Ni/acre/month, not to exceed the annual rate of 45-53
lbs/ton of dry matter per acre. Only apply 25 lbs N/acre in June -August if the
equivalent of 1-inch of water or rainfall can be applied at the same. time. If the
crop does not respond with at least 1000 lbs of growth within a 3-4 week period
do not mate another application until the plants have had the opportunity to ro-ake
adequate regrowth.
In _Mixture with bermuda.., the following assumes that the annual N rate is related to RYE for
b:—n-n :da, and the mixttue is being managed for about 40% of the annual yield from bermuda and
a`poL:t 60a,a From the prairiegrass. N uptake is closely related to grow-th, therefore do not apply
high ra:--s during months when the plants are not growing much.
A. At establislu-rent of the prairiegrass (fall planting) apply between 60-75 lbs
N/acre.
B. On established stands of prairiegrass growing on bermuda during the September
through November period apply about 75-100 lbs of N/acre; it would be best to
apply most of the N early in this season and hold the an.ouat applied in Nov;
to below 50 lbs/acre.
ui ..% 764t1 u7:)

C. During December and January do not apply any N, unless there was none or very
little applied during the September through November period, then consider
applying less than 20 Ibs/acre .
D. During the February to October period apply no more than 60-75 lbs N per
application and no more than this amount during any 30 day period. It would be
best to apply less than the 601bs/acre in February, unless plants are showing signs
of deficiency or growing conditions are favorable for rapid plant growth.
E. During the June through August period a minimum of 60 to 73 Ibs/acre should be
available for the bermuda component of the mixture. This does not preclude
higher rates is the summer of years when the spring growth of prairiegrass was
not as productive as expected and the manager has chosen to shift more of the
annual N to the summer months. The key is that total N/acre for the year should
not exceed RYE levels ofbermuda + prairiegrass (1.3 to 1.6 times RYE for
bermuda
Harvest Management
Hay or silage .... Prairie ass should be cut in the Late boot to early heading stage to provide
rapid regrowth and relatively high nutritive value. It should be cut Ieaving a 3 to 4-inch stubble
because reserve energv storage necessary for regrowth and new tiller buds are located above the
soil surface.
Nfaintaining a mixture of prairiegrass and berm, udagrass will depend largely on t_he timing of .1N
applications and harvest schedules. Managing the mixture will require one to favor the
prairiegrass cutting height since it is much less tolerant of close cutting than bennuda_ Harvests
will need to be made prior to full heading stage in April -May to minimize the shading of the
bermuda, which will just be initiating spring green -up. It will be imperative to keep the
prairiegrass harvested in such a way that it does not completely shade the bermuda. During the
summer prairiegrass stands are usually "open" enough that bermuda does not receive significant
shading.
When seed -set is desired the harvest should be after seeds have fully formed and are brown and
easy to shatter as one walks through the field. Usually it takes about 40-50 days for new. growth
to produce viable seeds; this will depend on temperature and moisture durnng the regrowth
period. Seeds produced in spring are usually larger and more -vigorous than those produced in
late summer.
Grazing... Prairiegrass should be rotationally grazed when it reaches a height of 10 to 14 inches
and should not be grazed below a 3) to 4 inch stubble. Depending on the temperature and soil
moisture it may be ready to regraze every 14 to 45 days, except in middle of summer and winter:
❑ my :COO, W PO 6

3I-0(o(p
RECEIVED 1 DENR 1 DWQ
Aquifer %tertion Section
APR 0 6 2009
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Charles Edwards A3166
Charles Edwards, A
507 Cedar Fork Church Rd
Beulaville, YVC 28518
910-298-5421
05-24-2002
This plan has been developed by:
Billy W Houston
Duplin Soil & PVater
PO Box 219
Kenansville, NC 28349
910-296-2120
Deve oper Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only qF
BY:
R 1 4 lOQ9
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenanc
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plap for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included
with this plan.
f
s 4
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department' of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: -5-
Technical Specialist Signature Date
j 866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Cover Page 1

M
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 4,894,560 gals/year by
a 5,280 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production
facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
11280
Incorporated
19372
Injected
21334
Irrigated
12261
Actual PAN
Applied (Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
12,524
4,999,761
-105 201
--------------'------- -- ----------------------------------------------
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Source Page 1 of 1 .

Narrative
This NVUP is written based on a wetted acres footprint(see attached).
Mr Edwards plans to establish a MatualBermuda Pasture rotation(see attached Prairiegrass Management)
on the North and South sides of the path,
Berniuda Pasture Yield 4.6 x 1,6 = 7.36 x 50 = 368 lbs N/ac [ Use 360 Ibs N/ac For Bermuda/-Matua
Rotation]
4�'`„ Jim ✓`1 ru �f,Z JV!'i =�'(/' r ��v4% V I `74. !-tJ! �,<li
r
,9s L. T
S----ZP'--0Z
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Narrative Page I of I

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this. operation. This plan provides an estimate of the
number of acres of cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to
be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being
supplied by manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and
liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A
balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the
utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal
waste is being utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being
applied. Soil tests should be used to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient
management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when
excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waite Tltlh7ation Tahle
Year 1
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res,
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
(lbs/A)
PA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrietit
Nutrient
Applied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
Source
Total
Use.
RYE
Applic.
Applic.
1000
Tract
Field
1.D.
Soil Series
Acre
Acres
Crop
RYE
Unit
Period
N
N
N
Method
Ibs/A
eal1A
tons
i000 sals
tons
70870
l
S7
Norfolk
6.2
6.2
Hybrid
*9.6
Tons
9/1-8131
*360
0
0
brig.
360
143.71
0
891.02
0.00
Benn.lRescuegrass O/S
Pasture
70870
lA
S7
Norfolk
1.7
1.7
Hybrid
*96
Tons
9/1-8/31
*360
0
0
brig.
360
143.71
0
250.06
c.oJ
Berm./Rescuegrass O/S
Pasture
70870
2
S7
Norfolk
6.2
6.2
Hybrid
*9.6
Tons
911.8/31
*360
0
0
Irrig,
360
143.71
0
891.02
0.00
Berm./Rescuegrass O/S
Pasture
70870
3
S7
Norfolk
4.7
4.7
Hybrid
*9.6
Tons
9/1-8/31
*360
0
0
Irrig.
360
143.71
0
671.14
0.00
Berm./Rescuegrass O/S
Pasture
- --- - - - -- ---- --------------_-.
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 5/24/02 WUT Page t

Wacta I Itili zatinn Tahlr-
i�var 1
Niirogen
Coimn.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Sciid
PA
Fert.
(Ibs/A)
PA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutient
Nutrient
Nutrient
Applied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
Source
Total
Use.
RYF-
Applic.
Applic.
1000
Tract
Field
ID
Soil Series
Acre
Acres
Crop
RYI:
Unit
Period
N
N
I N
Method
Ibs/A
eal/A
toils
1000 pals
tons
70870
4
S7
Norfolk
6.2
6.2
hybrid
*9.6
Tons
9/1-8/31
*360
4
0
Irrib,
360
143.71
0
891.02
0.00
Benn./Rescuegrass O/S
1
Pasture
70870
5
S7
Norl'olk
4.9
4.9
Hybrid
*9.6
Tons
9/1-8/31
*360
0
0
Irrig.
360
143.71
0
708.50
Berm,lRescuegrass OIS
Pasture
70970
5A
S7
Nodblk
1.4
1.4
Hybrid
*9.6
Tons,
WI.8131
*360
0
0
Irrig,
360
143.71
0
194.01
0.04
Berm./Rescuegrass OIS
Pasture
70870
6
S7j
Norfolk
2.0
2.0
Hybrid
*9.6
Tons
911-8131
*360
0
0
Irrib.
360
143.71
0
280.24
0.00
Berm.IRescuegrass OIS
Pastore
70870
6A
S7
Norfolk
L5
1.3
Hybrid
*9.6
Tons
9/1 -8/3 1
*360
0
0
Irrig.
360
143.71
0
222.75
0.00
Berm /Rescuegrass O/S
i
Pasture
I
gallons,
m
0.00
Balance. tons
0.00
Notes 1. ]n the tract column, symbol _ means leased, otherwise, opened.
866320 Database Version 2.0
2. Symbol * means user entered data.
Date Printed: 5/24/02 WUT Page 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following
table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation
system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive
wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in
any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches) F
70870
1
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
70870
1A
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
70970
2
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
70870
3
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
70870
4
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
70870
5
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
70870
5A
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
70870
6
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
70870
16A
Norfolk
0.50
0.9G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 IAF Page l of l

The following Lauoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of
acres needed for sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are
based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and
the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of
the effluent. At clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at
agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including
phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray
fields should not be used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to
load effluent application fields with high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent
cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous
is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
. Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard '
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
66.19
132.38
199.58
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
33.10
66.19
99.29
Soybean 40 bu
1 GO
14.04
62.06
124.11
186.17
------------------------------------ - _-- -- __
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Sludge Page 1 of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of
storage capacity available at the end of each month of the plan- Available storage
capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of
net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage
volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to
the design storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than
the design storage capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of
nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative, the
estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the
structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the
waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
I Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Ca ),city Davy
Start Date
10/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
l49
1
2
l58
1
3
164
1
4
171
1
5
177
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
10
180
1
11
180
1
12
149
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
_
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Capacity Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste (Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that
reaches surface water is prohibited.
Z. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land
to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure
an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change
in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available
moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of
management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per
acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5
tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided
grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see
USDA, MRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter
Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drif
from the land application field.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Specification Page 1 of 4

6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding,
waste will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland.
When waste is applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in
North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface
waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site
during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor
and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste
should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching.
Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to
planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto
which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine
farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited
on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to
perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the landowner.
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Specification Page 2 of 4

14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways. .
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
the fields have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed
waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged ,into the animal waste
management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on
all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.).
Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are
limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should
be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
t8. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure
plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge,
pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills.
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
2o. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal
waste is used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only
be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste
during the crop season.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Specification Page 3 of 4

21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be
tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are
applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other
restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc
and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop
sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH
shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil
and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a
minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other
waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
-----------------------------
866320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Specification Page 4 of 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, IA, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5A, 6, 6A
Hybrid Bertnudagrass/Rescuegrass Overseed: No Continent
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
s66320 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-24-2002 Crop Note Page I of I

Prairiegrass Management
AIso called Rescue grass Grass and "Matua"
Introduction
Prairiegrass (also called Rescuegrass or Nfatua) is a Bromus species. It was introduced about 150
years ago from South America and can be found in pastures, hay meadows, field edges and
along roadsides in many areas. One may find that prairiegrass is classified as Bromus
CC'[th 7rfir_zts, Vahl„ B. ivillderoivii, Kuntr; or B. unioloides, H.B.K. Nlatua is a "nam:.d variety"
it:st as " Kentucky 3 1" is a named variety of tall fescue and is classified as B. willdeno"vii. It
may sometimes be called "Grasslands Nlatua" because that is the official name given to it by the
New Zealand Research Division of AgResearch in 1973. In the 1950's there was a local selectio111
of rescuegrass named "Chapel Hill"; it was especially subject to the disease called pov%idery
mildew.
Identification Characteristics
Prairiegrass is an erect, bunch grass that grows up to three feet tall when seed heads
(inflorescence.) are present. It isa perennial, but performs much like an annual in this
envirorLmerit. It will produce seedheads during each regrowth period of three to six weeks,
especially from April tl rough October. The seedhzad is an open, drooping panicle with flat
soikelets, each containing 6 to 12 florets (seeds).
Th:. sb.ea,lls are rolled in oval shape, and the leaves are flat or slightly folded; the basal leaf
sh-!arh5 are covered with many fine hairs. Leaves are 1 /4 to '/ inch kvide and may be up to IS
ir.ches long. It has no auricles, but the ligule is long, membranous and fringed.
Possible Uses
Prairiegrass is highly palatable and may be used for grazing, hay or silage. Nlost animals (carle.
goats, hors--s, sheep and wildlife) will eat it well and animal performance potential is good to
excellent. When given access to a field containing prairiegrass in mixture with fescue
orchardgrass, or bermudagrass cattle tend to select it over the others.
Because of its seasonal Qro%%-th pattern and response to moisture and fertility it is usefu! in
cropping systems %`:here confinement animal wastes are land applied. It offers an alternative to
annual ryegrass and ce-eats for winter forage, with the added advantage that it is more product' . e
!ace.- into the summer than all of the winter annuals.
prairiegrass may be grown with clovers and alfalfa, but it Wray become very competitive if
w, PJCJ W?o

. P
grow h.is not harvested or gra--d in a timely way.
Adaptation and Performance Characteristics
Soils... Prairiegrass is best adapted to well drained coarser textured soils (sandy loam, loamy
sand, loam), however it will grow well on fine textured soils that are well drained" It is not as
productive nor competitive on poorly drained soils as on well drained soils. It does not do as well
as bahia and bermuda on droughty soils, but it is better adapted than fescue, orchardgrass or
annual ryegrass. It responds to moisture and high fertility when the stands are dense.
Seasonal growth pattern... The seasonal growth pattern for prairiegrass is somewhat similar to
tall fescue and annual ryegrass with more than half of the annual yield produced in the March -
June period. During December through February it produces slightly more than tall fescue and
annual ryegrass. Summer growth of the cool season grasses is not usually significant, but
prairiegrass seems to be more productive than others (such as tali fescue and orchardgrass) when
moisture is available. Summer production is not nearly as much as with bermudagrass,
crabgrass, sudangrass, millet, bluestems, sw•itchgrass or ;arnagrass. Summer growth will always
produce sLedheads after three to six weeks of regrowth, whereas, fescue and orchardQrass will
not have seedheads after the spring growth is harvested_
Realistic Yield Expectations... Yields of pure stands of prairiegrass usually range from 3 to 5
tons dry matter per acre, but may be higher when dense stands are -supplied with favorable
roisture and nutrients. There are virtually no documented data available for realistic yields of
prame-rass on many soils and at various N levels in North Carolina. Until further data are
collected, the following suggestions may be useful for estimating expected yields for dense
stands of prairiegrass grow-n Mon-- or in mixtu-e with bermuda.
Pure stands...There are very limited comparisons of pure stands of prairiegrass with other
Species, especially when the prairiegrass was allowed to reseed. The data in tables 1 compare
it with other cool season Grasses in tests where reseeding was not allowed. Results for the first
year of each test may give an indication ofho«- it would perform with full stands; second and
third year results were poor because stands always thirmed in absence of reseeding" When
esurriating potential RYE for pure stands ofpralrlegrass COnslder the following cOr l7arl50ns
tall fescue:
I . On soils where both fescue and prairiegrass are well adapted, the yields of prairiegrass
may be 1 tol.5 times more than fescue.
B. On sandy, well drained, to excessively drained soils, prairiegrass may yield 1.5 to 3 times
more than tall fescue.
C. On wet or poorly drained soils, prairiegrass may yield .75 to 1.0 times as much as fescue.
Mixed stands with berm udagrass.. Prairiegrass makes more than half its annual growth ill
March -June and another 13-25% during the September -December period, whereas berm, Lida
makes most of its growth in June -August. Therefore these species w"i€[ compete for nutrients and
light during the months of overlap, and manag, r—ment during those periods can shift the botanical

composition significant[y.
The annual yield of this mixture (prairiegrass-bermuda) growing on adapted soils will not be
additive of each species grown alone. However, a general guide is that the mixture will likely
yield 1.3 to 1.6 times as much as berrnuda grown alone, this means yields of well maintained
mixtures may range from 4 to 8 tons/acre on productive soils receiving adequate moisture and
timely harvest management.
Nutrient composition.. The nutritive value of the forage is strongly related to prior fertilization
and the age or stage of growth at time of harvest or grazing. When harvested at vegetative to
early heading stage of growth the protein content of prairiegrass may range from 12 to 18 % and
the TDN may range from 6Q to 72 %. The nutritive value ofprairiegrass stems/seedheads tends
to decline slightly slower than other cool season grasses, but very mature plants may contain less
than 1 0% protein and »% TDN.
When grown with bermudagrass, the composition of the mixture will be somewhat less due to
the relatively lower nutritive value of the bermudagrass component.
Disease... Prairiegrass will often (most every spring) be infected with a disease called powdery
mildew. To minimize the impact of this disease, it is best to irnrnediately mow or graze the
affected growth to a ; to 4 inch stubble. Often the mildew is more pronounced on "old"
vegetation, therefore mowing or grazing schedules may have to be modified to address the
problem. There are no pesticides registered in the USA to control this disease on forage crops.
Establishment
Planting dates.. The optimum time to plant is September -October, but its possible to get
stands (with more risk) in November and March. Planting on prepared seedbed in early
Septzrnber will usually result in more fall growth, however seedlings can be stressed and killed
r4hen moisture is severely limiting. If planting into bermudagrass sod, consideration has to be
made for the competition from the existing bermuda. Even though bermuda may not be growinry
rapidly during September, the evapotranspiration rate can mean limiting of soil moisture for
Young seedlings. To minimize this effect, one can plant in October when berm.uda is not very
competitive. It is possible to plant into bermuda sod in September if moisture is not limiting or if
bermuda top growth is killed with a contact herbicide like Gramoxone. _
Planting depth... Prairiegrass establishment is very sensitive to planting depth (optimum is 1/4.
to " inch). Many thin and poor stands have been caused by planting too deep.
Planting method... Establishment may be obtained by planting into a completely prepared
seedbed or by no -till planting into closely clipped or grazed sod. Drilling seeds to proper depth
improves the odds of obtaining good stands. However, broadcast seeding onto completely
prepared seedbed, followed by rolling with a cuitipacker has given satisfactory stands. Seedling
development and early growth rates will be better from prepared seedbeds than from no -till
planting into sod, especially bermudagrass sod.
0 3,5 ?OUO,WpO 3

When planting into sod, it is t.,sentiai that the existing sod be short (less than 3-inches) with very
little surface "thatch" which prevents seed contact with the soil. If sod planting into actively
growing bermuda it will be necessary to "temporarily stunt" the berrnuda with a herbicide or
light cultivation as a way to reduce competition for light and moisture. Be aware that this option
adds a level of risk into the survival of the bermuda, especially if late summer N and K
management are out of balance or an insect outbreak occurs. Planting in October or after the
bermuda has been "frosted" will mean very little growth of prairiegrass before spring.
Planting rates... seeds are large (about 35,000-50,000 seeds/lb), compared to tall fescue or
ryegrass (225,000-250,000) and seedling vigor is not proportionally better. Plant 30-35 lbs
when drilling, but 35-40 when broadcasting on surface and rolling. As with any species, if
conditions (planting date, soil contact, depth, moisture) are not optimum, consider increasing
seeding rates up to 30 percent.
Volunteer reseeding... Even though prairiegrass is considered a "perennial" it practically
performs as an arrrival. To maintain productive stands for several years it will be necessary to
manage at least one growth cycle each year for seed production and shatter. Seed -set may be
encouraged anytime from May through August, however mid -summer seed production tends to
minimize the amount of Loss in forage quality/yield since it is a time when the plant naturally
makes less foliage growth; plenty of seed should be produced in June -July. Obtaining successful
volt:nteer stands Nvill depend on seed viability and control of competition from other established
L,rass2s during the September through October period_ Germinating seeds and developing
seedlings will need to receive sunlight and moisture to survive. If prairiegrass is being grown on
btnTudaorass it will be necessary to graze or mow the bermuda closely in early September.
There will be an advantage to lightiy disturbing the soil surface to provide some soil to seed
contact to many years.
Fertilization
�Aany people have said that 700 to 800 lbs of Nitrogen can be taken up ay "IMatua"; uptake and
plant survival oCsuch rates are only part of the story. It is true that the grass may survive such
rates, but crop uptake and ef—Ficiency of Nitrogen recovery are strongly related to dry mazer
..'tends or any crop. ti�hen considering a realistic yield that can be expected in this environment
and management scheme, it is likeLv that such rates would result in significant losses ofN to the
1. irorim nt. There is no controlled and documented evidence that shows it is practical to appl}"
such rates to any crop ir1 NC nor elsewhere. Even in controlled greenhouse trials, the N recovery
etftciencies drop significantly when N applications were above 250 to 400 lbs/acrelyear.
Pralrlegrass, like most other coot season grasses will perform best when pH is above 6.0 and P
and K index are medium or better. The P and K composition in tissue is similar to other grasses,
ho%vever when hiari rates are being applied to land, all grasses will take up "luxury" amounts of
K- K composition is usually similar to Ni composition in most forage grasses.
according to repots from Pennsylvania prairiegrass may contain lower levels of ce nain trace
elements SLICtl aS magnesium and iodine than other coot season grassers.
C. Lflsea HJO::'Ssa ilrs'„Z n:'�r3riss tug :Coo tv;1D 4

Pure Sta nd5 ...Prairiegrass responds to high fertility, especially when moisture is available.
— However, its-Nitroaen�composition may be more similar to ryearass than tall fescue or
orchardarass; this means that it may contain about 45 to 55 lbs N/ton dry matter, depending on
timing of fertilizer applications, age or stage of plant growth and presence of powdery mildew
disease. It should receive most of its N during the September -October and late February through
N1ay months. Consider the following N management for dense pure stands:
A. At establishment of the prairiegrass (fall planting) apply between 60-75 lbs
N/acre.
B . On established stands of prairiegrass and ones that have reseeded satisfactorily,
apply about 75- 100 lbs of N/acre during the September through November period;
it would be best to apply most of the N early in this season (September -early
October) and hold the amount applied in November to below 50 lbs/acre.
C. Durinc December and January do not apply any N, unless there was none or very
little applied during the September through November period, then consider
applying less than 20 lbs/acre .
D. During the February through May period apply no more than 60-75 lbs N per
application and no more than this amount during any 30 day period. It would be
best to apply less than the 60 lbs/acre in February, unless plants are showing signs
of deficier:cy or growing conditions are favorable for rapid plant growth.
E. During the June tb—ouah August period prairiegrass may continue growing if
moisture is available. During these "off months", prairiegrass should not receive
more than about 25 lbs NI/acre/month, not to exceed the annual rate of 45-55
lbs/ton of dry matter per acre. Only apply 25 lbs N/acre in June -August if the
equivalent of I -inch of water or rainfall can be applied at the same. time. If the
crop does not respond with at least 1000 lbs of growth within a ;-4 week period
do not make another application until the plants have had the opportunity to make
adequate regrowth.
In Nlixture with bermuda... the fol[owing assumes that the annual Ni rate is related to RYE for
Bermuda, and the mixtur.is being managed for about 40% of the annual yield from berrnuda and
about 601/ from the prairiegrass. N uptake is closely related to gro,;vth, therefore do riot apply
high rates during months when the plants are not growing much.
A. At establishment of the prairiegrass (fall planting) apply between 60-75 lbs
N/ac re.
B. On established stands of prairiegrass growing on bermuda during the September
through November period apply about 75-100 lbs of Ni/acre; it would be best to
apply most of the N early in this season and hold the amount applied in November
to below 50 lbs/acre.
D :CU WrID

C. During December and January do not apply any N, unless there was none or very
little applied during the September through November period, then consider
applying less than 20 lbs/acre .
D. During the February to October period apply no more than 60-75 ibs N per
application and no more than this amount during any 30 day period. It would be
best to apply less than the 601bs/acre in February, unless plants are showing signs
of deficiency or growing conditions are favorable for rapid plant growth.
E. During the June through August period a minim' of 60 to 75 lbs/acre should be
available for the bermuda component of the mixture. This does not preclude
higher rates in the summer of years when the spring growth of prairiegrass was
not as productive as expected and the manager has chosen to shift more of the
annual N to the surnmer months. The key is that total N/acre for the year should
not exceed RYE levels of bermuda + prairiegrass (1.3 to' 1.6 times RYE for
bermuda
Harvest Management
Hay or silage .... Prairie should be cut in the late boot to early heading stage to provide
rapid regro-vvth and relatively high nutritive value. It should be cut Ieaving a 3 to 4-inch stubble
because reserve energy storage necessary for regrowth and new tiller buds are located above the
soil surface_
Maintaining a mixture of prairiegrass and bermudagrass will depend largely on the timir:a of N
applications and harvest schedules. Managing the mixture will require one to favor the Y
prairiegrass cutting height since it is much less tolerant of close cutting than Bermuda. Harvests
will need to be made prior to full heading stage in April -May to tninirnize the shading of the
bermuda, which will just be initiating spring green -up. It will be imperative to keep the
prairiegrass harvested in such a way that it does not completely shade the bermuda. During the
summer prairiegrass stands are usually "open" enough that ber-muda does not receive significant
shading.
When seed -set is desired the harvest should be after seeds have fully formed and are brown and
easy to shatter as one walks through the field. Usually it takes about 40-50 days for new. growth
to produce viable seeds; this will depend on temperature and moisture during the regrowth
period. Seeds produced in spring are usually larger and more -vigorous than those produced in
late summer.
Grazing... Prairiegrass should be rotationally grazed when it reaches a height of 10 to 14 inches
and should not be grazed below a 3 to 4 inch stubble. Depending on the temperature and soil
moisture it may be ready to regraze every 14 to 45 days, except in middle of summer and winter.
Q.�Q us'B OO.I"`4ec �I�Vlese��Lsy; wg 2COO.W?Q

OF W^A 7�A
aua
�� �� ��1aG
i! Y
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
May 8, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7000 2870 0000 1709 6298
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Charles Edwards, Jr.
507 Cedar Fork Church Rd
Beulaville, NC 28518
Subject: Certificate of Coverage under the General Permit
Cedar Lane Farm
Facility Number: 31-66
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Edwards:
Please submit a copy of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan for the
referenced facility along with a cover letter requesting that a Certificate_of Coverage under Swine
Waste General Permit AWGI00000 be issued to you for the referenced facility. You may want
to consult with a technical specialist to assist with this matter. This information should be
submitted to the following addresses:
and
DWQ-NDPU
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Stonewall Mathis
DWQ-W1RO
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Phone: [phone]
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845 Fax: [phone]

Mr. Charles Edwards, Jr.
-May 8, 2001
Page Two
Please submit the requested information in writing within 30 days of your receipt of this
letter. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at
910-395-3900 ext. 203,
Sincerely,
Stonewall Mathis
Environmental Engineer I
cc: Sue Homewood, DWQ Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation
Howard Hobson, Carroll's Foods
DWQ Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Wff r
S:\WQS\ANIMALS\DUPLIN\2001\31-66letter
U.S. Postal Service
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT
(Domestic Mai! Only; No insurance Coverage Provided)
ea
Cr
ru
O C
1 A L P
��
Er C3
Postage $
0
Certified Fee
`�O� D
-3
Return Receipt Fee
{Endorsement Required)
trn
J� r��,, �1 erer�
C3
p
l3
Restricted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required)
O
1
Total Postage d Fees $ 3. / J �
r%_
03
ru
ant
-- -•- i Lei-�✓---j'
=--------------------------
��/.o.rdr �Y 1-
O
-
tieat ApG No.; or PO Box No.
^� J//'�+ �// / i1i 2
0
V v l--
city, S e, IIp+ 4
K---L--�-----•-•�-••-•-..t-------------
:Ir �11
r .r

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Goveri
William G. Ross Jr., Secr
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Charles Edwards, Jr.
Cedar Lane Farm
507 Cedar Fork Church Road
Beulaville NC 28518
Dear Charles Edwards, Jr.:
MAY p 9 200l
May 2, 2001
WX
1 � •
10
NC ENR
NORTH CARC>LINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Cedar Lane Farm
Facility Number 31-66
Duplin County
A letter dated January 15, 1999 was sent to advise you about concerns associated with Certified Animal
Waste Management Plans and the method by which the irrigated acres within the plans were calculated. Only
the acres that are wetted can be credited in the waste management plan as receiving waste application. Any
acreage within the plan that can not be reached by waste application equipment can not be used as part of your
Plan.
An evaluation by John Hunt on 9/15/99 was made to review the actual number of acres at your facility
that receive animal waste during land application. The evaluation of your facility has yielded one of the
following two results as indicated by the box marked with an "X".
Category 1:
❑ The evaluation of your facility could not be'completed due to a lack of information. Please
contact your Technical Specialist to assist in providing John Hunt the necessary information
to potentially exempt your facility from undergoing a complete wettable acre determination.
Please submit this information to John Hunt, at 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington,
NC 28405-3845, within in 90 days of the receipt of this letter. If you have any questions
please contact John Hunt at [phone]. If within 90 days you are unable to provide
John Hunt with the information you are automatically required to complete a Wettable
Acre Determination as described by Category 2 below, within 180 days of receipt of
this letter.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Category 2:
Your facility has been identified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
as a facility that may have overestimated the number of acres actually receiving animal
waste. Therefore, some or all of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates
set in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated Technical Specialist to have him
or her conduct a Wettable Acre Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must
be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to conduct
Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialist with the N.C. Cooperative Extension
Service, the Soil and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and the Division of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System must be made and
the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be returned to DWQ within the next
180 days. If the needed modifications are not made and if the form is not returned within the
required time, DWQ will be forced to take appropriate enforcement actions to bring this facility
into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty assessments, permit revocation,
and/or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of the attached Wettable
Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the address listed on the form. Please
note that both the owner and the Technical Specialist must sign the certification. A copy of all
the Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste Utilization Plan
must be kept at your facility. DWQ and the Division of Soil & Water Conservation Staff will
review all documentation during their annual visit of your facility. An additional copy must by
kept on file at the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office. Please note that if you install
or modify your irrigation system, a designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer
must also sign the Wettable Acre Determination Certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sonya Avant of our
Central Office staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Carroll's Foods, Inc.

Revised April 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number Operation is flagged fora wettable
Farm Name: cgoPi_ L-A t-kVIP . acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: G�js q-v w Ass Part 11 eligibility item(s) Ft F2 F3
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: =T 1-i uA '
Date of site visit: el L, S - N C
Operation not required to secure WA�-
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP: 2 3 Operation pended for wettable acre
etermination based on P9 P2 P3
Annual farm PAN deficit: pounds 5�s'"/4,-W4 .79 P
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part III).
PART 11. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required becauseoperation fails -one of the _eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over -application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according tofarm's last two -years -Df irrigation -records.-.
F2 Unclear, illegible,- or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure fo.deduct-required
bufferlsetback acreage; or25% of total acreageidentified .in-CAWMP.includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers -or less .than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number 316
Part III. Field by Field Determination
of
75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'2
TYPE OF
-IRRIGATION
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
- ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
-76 lb
ySYSTEM
Z
,2
3
I
' G2�
'
I
zz.$
473.
I
E
-ls
I
lI �
I
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant. null_ zone. or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, -etc. cross more than one field, inspectodreviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBERS - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of Its total acres -and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the-farm's previous two years' (1997 & 9998) of irrigation records, -.cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. _Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section -and must be -accessible
by irrigation system.
Part IV. Pending WA Determinations
PZ Plan lacks following information:
P2 Plan revision may satisfy 75%-rule_based on adequate overall PAN deficit and by
adjusting all field acreage to below 75% use rate
P3 Other (ie/in process of installing new irrigation system):

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Charles Edwards, Jr.
Cedar Lane Faun
213 Lyman Rd
Beulaville NC 28518
Dear Charles Edwards, Jr.:
1 Z"-
V—T
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROL-INA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 31-66
Duplin County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRYI, DRY2, DRY3, SLURI, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumes paper

SECTIONSENDER: COMPLETE THIS
■ Complete items 1, 2,and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
All
a, lle
SECTIONCOMPLETE THIS DELIVERY
Rec ived by 3tease P 'nt Clearly) MW
very
�r
Signature
x [I Agent
❑ Addressee
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
if YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service i pe
ertified Mail 0 Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Pee) ❑ yes
2. Article Number (Copy from service label)
-yaoa 1170_ '0600 I7 f / I
PS Form 3811,4July i999i i 1 ! $ p �j—,
Domestic Return ReCei t i02595-00•M-0952

r tification of Change of ( �nership
Animal Waste Management Facility
r at
(Pl s: t} print all information that does not requir a 5ign3turc)
In accordance with the requircments'bf I5A NCAC ?H .0217(a)(1)(H)(xii) this form is official
notification to the Division of Environmental Ivlanaaemem (DEM) of the transfer of owners;•tip of an
Animal Waste Management Facility. This form must be submitted to DEM no later thzn_60 days
following the transfer of ownership.
General Information:
Name of Farm: Facili:''
Previous Owner(s) Name: D.4Al;try t ,kcJ 4" Pho:,c :;0,l 10--2-Te-4 757f
New Owners) Nal-ne: Q 1nAp let: 'a rc?5 1.r Phone No:
Mailing Address:
FGrrn Loco:nor=: Fourtecri Digit HvdroIo is unit: 630 3GC% D `7v 6 e of D G =
La;inude and Lon_:de: / County: i; ►�
Please attach a copy of a coun:y road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, rmlepost, ertc.): / � I� `S ��-�-� EP <,- o, i�
e) t✓ 44zrni4rzel— Ci7!!�( �-i-units
Otaeracinn Descriotion:
Type cr'swine
No. of Am rr :ls
D Wean to : eedtr
5e�eedw to Finish
e5_2 ? V .
D Fan ow to Wean
D F arnow to Fewde.
Fa, -,ow to Fnish
Type of Poulrry
* Layer
Pullets
NO. of A'-` :als
Type of Catde
D Daiy
D Beef
No. of,fir.-.-cls
Ozher Type of Lives.ock: NL=5er of Ar_*r~.Y 's .
Acreage Available for Aoolicadon: 3� 7� Required Acreae^ - 711
Numbc- of Lazoons / Storage Ponds 'Z Total Capacity: 1 t u , Cubic Fttt (f,5)
*ov*-******i«a,i **W*K0***aW**..** .=*-
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that a11 the above information is core; t and will be i _dated i.'pon chanzin3. I (-c) unde.,: .c of erasion and
maintenance procedures established in approved animal waste management plan for the farm nanm.,d above and will
implement these. procedures. I (we) know, that any expansion to the existing design capacity of tlhe treatment are
storage system or cons=uc6on of new facilities will regL'-re a new certification to be submitted to u1_ Division of
Environmental Management before the new anima's are siockcei I (we) understand that these must be no dis:hxgc of a-iimal
waste from the storage or application system to surf -ace waters of the sate either directly t`t<ouga a man -may: conveyance or
from a storm event less severe than the 25-y`=,, 2-1-hour storm and there must not tY ,.in-ot: frorn the aani;=Lion of L.1ic_1
waste. I (we) and--rs=d that nm-off of pollusns from lounging and heavy use areas must bz :minimized usin3 tcchnica�
standards developed b the fiat .ad _. v-_'f l w tit the fa' i =nd a: ;he
_ pe y � tL-3. iZes�t::� gory:.: oz Se^:;:.` Tne arpro Plan i:! be :.d a:
ottic Of the Iota► Soil a. -id Water Co.^.&zr':a:i0n D � --� I (w'e) i:no L"t t: airy t SQC. .�; C On niCSi Ce 3_� "?' �� 'J�' � _..iii:21
specia-list and submit;cd to the Soil and Wa.cr Conservation District prior to impltmt.-nation. A change in laid ownership
r:quires w; itten nouricat.ion to DF`I or a new certification (if the approved plap is charged) wimin 60d_ys of a titl: t----isfc..
Dame of New Land Owner Ck.► rle. ' w. r�lwa fv�s S• .
Signature:
Name of Manager(if different from own=;):
Signature:
Date: 3 -/17 - y9
Date:
Please sign and return this form to: N. C. Division Of Environmental `1ana:ement
iz :te- ^uafi: - Section, Compliance Group
Raleigh, NC. _17636-0535
NCO -- May 3, 1996

Wettable Acres Determination Certification
Name of Facility:
C&A- F
4A., e_
Facility Number: V =- GC-
Owner(s) Naive:
%.a rles CU-
s 5r.
Phone No: 9 - zy -S
Mailing Address:
o %
Frlk. e-AvrG1,
. e. 2 91S-1
By signing this form, the facility owner and Technical Specialist acknowledge the completion of the
Wettable Acres Determination. All necessary Wettable Acre Determination Field Data Sheets and
calculations were completed to conduct a Wettable Acre Determination. The facility's Waste
Utilization Plan has been amended as necessary to reflect actual wetted acreage. A copy of all
worksheets, calculations, and other Wettable Acres Determination documents, along with the
applicable Waste Utilization Plan and Wettable Acre Determination Certification will be filed with
the local Soil and Water Conservation District. A copy will also be kept on site with the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan. Any future modifications must be approved by a technical
specialist and filed with the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. If any
modifications to the existing irrigation system or any new irrigation equipment was required to
adequately address the waste management needs of this facility, an Irrigation Specialist or
Professional Engineer has certified the design and installation below.
Owner Name: CL+.��{/%CS `�-c� ��n�s 5'/:�
Owner Signature. L,Gv. - .�1 gn • Date:
Technical Specialist Name: tj;)/,, W.
Technical Specialist Signature:
If assisted by an Irrigation Specialist or Professional Engineer please read and sign below:
Animal waste application equipment has been designed or modified to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan and according to NRCS Standards. Animal waste
application equipment has been installed according to NRCS Standards and is ready for use:.
Irrigation Specialist/PE Name:
Irrigation Specialist/PE Signature:
Submit this form to:
Attn: Sonya Avant
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Date:
WADC - 7199

Landowner I Operator Name
Adress
WETTABLE ACRES
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARMATERS
and
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET SUMMARY
Charles Edwards Jr
507 Cedar Fork Church Rd
Beulaville, NC 28518
Telephone [phone]
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications
COUNTY Duplin
DATE 04/26/1999
Tract
Number
Hydrant
or
field (1)
Number
acres
start end
wetted
area
acres
middle
wetted
area
acres
stop end
wetted
area
Approximate
Maximun
Useable Size
of field (2)
(acres) Table
column
Length
of
pulls
in feet
Width
of
pulls
in feet
Soil Type,
Slope
(%)
Crop(s)
Maximun
Application
Rate (3)
(In/hr)
Maxiumn
Application
per Irrigation
cycle (3)
(inches)
70870
p1A
0.74
1
0
1.74 EE70
B-C
397
110
NOA
0-5
Bermuda/Smailgrain
0.5
1
70870
PI
0.74
5.13
0,33
6.2 EE70
B-E
1016
220
NOA
0.5
BERMUDA I SMALL GRAIN
D.5
1
70870
p2
0.74
5.13
0,33
6.2 EE70
B-E
1016
220
NOA
0-5
BermudalSmallgraln
0.5
1
70870
E3
0.77
3.54
0.36
4.67 EE80
B-E
1016
152
NOA
0-5
BERMUDA I SMALL GRAIN
0.5
1
70870
p4
0.69
5.22
0.29
6,2 E175
B-E
1016
220
NOA
0-5
Bermudalsmallgrain
0.5
1
70870
5
0.69
3.95
0.29
4.93 E175
B-E
783
220
NOA
0-5
BermudalSmaligrain
0.5
1
70870
A
0.25
1.1
0
1.35 EE60
B-C
282
170
NOA
0-5
Bermudalsmallgrain
0.5
1
70870
0.17
1.78
0
1.95 EE60
B-C
705
110
NOA
0-5
Berm udalSmallgrain
0.5
1
70870
A
0.17
1.38
0
1.55 EE60
B-C
545
110
NOA
0-5
Bermudalsmallgrain
" Tract 70870 Total Acres 49.22 minus operation(81Ac) = 41.02 Ac Cropland Total
1 see attached map.
2 Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
3 Refer to N.C. Irrigation guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section II G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used.
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Date i 4

p6 1.95 ac-
- - i

ANI�KAL WILSTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: CHARLES EDWARDS
Location: 507 CEDAR FORK'CHURCH RD
BEULAVILLE NC 28518
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Feeder to Finish Swine
Number of Animals: 5280.00 hogs
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:.
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown
and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more
nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or
when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may
result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the _animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
5280 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 10032 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
5280 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 12144 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
Or
--------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
70870
1
NOA
BC
5.2
260
6.2
1612
I
+APR-
4:44
70870
�1
I
lSG
11
1100 1
16.2
1620
APR
70870
lA
NOA
BC
5.2
1260 1
11.74.1452.4I+APR-
SEP
70870
-1A
SG
1
1.74
I
11C)o
1174
+SEP-
APR
70870
2
NOA
BC
5.2
I
1260 1
16.2
11612
+APR-
SEP
70870
2
SG
1
1
I
1100 1
16.2
1620
+SEP-
APR
70870
3
NOA
BC
5.2
I
1260 1
14.67
11214.2
+APR-
SEP
70870
SG
1
1-3
1
I
1100 1
14.67
�467
+SEP-
APR
70870
4
NOA
BC
5.2
I
1260 1
16.2
11612
+APR-
SEP
70870
SG
1
1-4
1
I
1100 1
16.2
1620
+SEP-
APR
Page: 3

ANIMAL WJXSTE UTILIZATION PLAN
70870
15
INOA
�BC
�5.2
1260 I
14.93
11281.8
+APR
SEP
70870
-5
SG
1
100
4.93
1
I
1493
+SEP-
APR
70870
5A
NOA
BC
5.2
I
1260 1
11.35
1351
+APR-
SEP
70870
-5A
SG
1
100
135
I
11.35
1 +SEP-
APR
70870
NOA
BC
5.2
J6
1
I
1260 1
11.95
1507
+APR-
SEP
70870
SG
1
195
I
1100
11.95
+SEP-
APR
70870
6A
NOA
BC
5.2
I
1260 1
11.55
1403
+APR-
SEP
70870
-6A
SG
1
100
1.55
I
1155
+SEP-
APR
END
TOTALI12524.4
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter. annuals follow summer annuals.
+ - Dates shown reflect optimum uptake periods for nutrients. Waste
appilcation may begin up to thirty(30) days prior to planting or
green -up of forages, and extend past optimum dates shown if
plant growth, pumping conditions, and PAN loading rates permit.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL10
N - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
+ - Dates shown reflect optimum uptake periods for nutrients. Waste
application may begin up to thirty(30) days prior to planting or
green --up of forages, and extend past optimum dates shown if
plant growth, pumping conditions, and PAN loading rates permit.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a.
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BC
SG
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS=CONTROLLED GRAZED
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
TONS
AC
50
100
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
**
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
WETTABLE
_ACRES
34.79
LBS AW N USED
12524.4
0
0
34.79
12524.4
* BALANCE
-380.4
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1953.6 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 9768
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 32.56 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 78.144 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25e depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, -realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
I I
l Field l
I
Soil Type
I
l Crop
I
70870
l 1 l
NOA-
l BC
70870
I 1
l 1A l
NOA
I
l BC
70870
I I
2 l
NOA
I
I BC
70870
I
l 3 I
NOA
I
l BC
70870
I I
l 4 I
NOA
!
l BC
70870
l 5 l
NOA
l BC
70870
I I
15A I
NOA
I BC
70870
I I
l 6 I
NOA
I
l BC
70870
I I
l 6A l
NOA
I BC
70870
I
I -1 I
i SG
(Application RatelApplic. Amount
(in/hr)
j
(inches)
l .50
l *1.0
.50
l *1.0
I
I .50
�
l *1.0
l .50
I
l *1.0
i
l .50
I
l *1.0
I
l .50
l *1.0
I
I .50
I *1.0
I
l .50
I *1.0
I .50
*1.0
l .5
l *�
Page. 8

ANT.MAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
-1
70870
-1
I --1A I
I
I SG
1
.5
f
I *1
70870
I I
I --2 I
I
1 SG
I
1 .5
I
I *1
70870
I -3 I
1 SG
.5
I *1
70870
I f
I -4 I
1
I SG
I .5
I *1
70870
I
I -5 1
I
I SG
I .5
I *1-
70870
-5A I
! SG
I .5
! *1
I
70870 I
I
-6 I
I
I SG
I
I .5
!
I *1
70870 !
I
-6A
I
I SG
I
I .5
I
f *1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of -the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
Page: 9

ANT4AL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables I and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical -specialist after you receive the waste -analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
THIS PLAN IS WRITTEN USING 100lbs N/AC(SEE ATTACHED NCSU MEMO). THE SMALLGRAIN
OVERSEEDING MAY BE EITHER GRAZED OR CUT FOR HAY. THE BERMUDA MAY BE EITHER
CONTROL GRAZED OR CUT FOR HAY. IF CUT FOR HAY [305lbs N/AC] SHOULD BE USED IN
PLACE OF THE 250lbs N/AC SHOWN IN COLUMN SIX ON PAGE THREE OF THIS PLAN.
Page: 10

.WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste.which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns, or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
B. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in_a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
15. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 12

WASTE. UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is -responsible for obtaining and
implementing a °closure.plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,.
- and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible -markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 13

AXIMAL.WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:CHARLES EDWARDS(31-66)
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: CHARLES EDWARDS
(Please print)
Signature: , Date:
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Person Preparing Plan:
Date:
(Please print)BILLY W. HOUSTON
Affiliation:DUPLIN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Phone No. 910-296-2120
Address (Agency): PO BOX 277
KENANSVILLE NC 28349
Signature: Date:
Page: 14

NATUTtAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD
Nutrient Management
(Acre)
Code 590
DEMrrTION
Managing the amount, form, placement, and
timing of applications of nutrient fertilizer.
PURPOSE
To supply plant nutrients in amounts
dictated by soil test, or tissue analysis, or
accepted recommendations based on
realistic yield expectations or plant
performance for an intended use
To minimize excessive nutrient application
While meeting a plant's performance based
requirement for a particular nutrient
To minimize nutrient loss to surface and
ground water.
CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE
APPLIES
On lands where nutrients are applied. This
standard applies to management of nutrients
associated with organic waste, commercial
fertilizer, legume crops, and crop residues.
Fertilizer source, time, and method of
application shall be planned to confdrm to
seasonal variation in plant uptake needs and
soil profile properties to optimize economic
return and minimize nutrient loss by
leaching or surface transport. Nitrogen or
phosphorous are the most critical nutrients
in planning for water quality.
2. Soil pH affects the availability of nutrients.
Use soil tests to adjust soil pH to the level
best suited for the crops being grown.
University crop production guides and the
North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals
590-1
Manual can also be consulted to find this
value
Soil shall be tested every tvo years. As
deficiency of any of the 16 essential
elements u,i)1 limit uptake and utilization of
other more envirorunentally active nutrients.
Soil testing identifies these yield limiting
deficiencies as well as identifying
I mbalances, excesses and levels potentially
toxic to plants.
?. Zinc am Copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be
used -when these metals approach excess
levels. Refer to Table 2 in Standard 633 for
threshold levels of these nutrients.
5. All sources and forms of plant nutrients
including carryover from legumes and
animal waste being made available for plant
growth and production shall be considered
in developing a nutrient management plan.
6. All animal waste products shall be analyzed
by the agronomic division of North Carolina
Department of Agriculture (NCDA) or other
acceptable laboratories and the
recommendations used to develop and
implement a nutrient management program.
Waste shall be tested within 60 days of
utilization. Unless otherwise required
nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
nutrient_
Establish a Realistic Yield Expectation
(R.Y.E.) for any crop to be fertilized_ This
is accomplished by determining the mean of
the best three yields of the last five
consecutive crop harvests. If this
information is not available, R.Y.E. can be
established from specially developed soil
interpretation records for Nutrient
Consmation practice standards arc revicwtd periodically and updated irneeded.
To obtain the current version of this standard, contact tht Natural Resources Conservation
.Scn•icc.

590-2
management planning, Fann Service
Agency records, university trials, or
inference from crop performance on soil
with very similar physical and chemical
features.
Application rates for nitrogen shall not
exceed the amount determined by the
R.Y.E. concept. Application rates for all
other nutrients shall not exceed the amount
recommended in a soil test report or any
approved source of this informarion for any
nutrient targeted as a planning priority.
There are situations where a soil test report
would not make a recommendation (based
on economic return, i.e., a soil test index of
51), but an environmental problem would
not result until the index reached 200.
Where animal waste is involved, thi$
situation may be common. Even xvherc
additional response is not expected, it
should be feasible to add amounts which
will be removed in the harvested crop
without significant degradation of the
environment.
9_ Choose a fertilization rate within
recommended ranges that considers local
water quality needs.
10. A]] nitrogen rates for hay production are for
pure grass stands. Reduce all hay crop
nitrogen rates by 25 percent when grazing.
For each ton of hay harvested from a
pasture system the nitrogen application rate
may be returned to the R.Y.E. application
rate for hay.
11. Important considerations for nutrient
application include amount, source,
placement, and timing. Plant nutrients may
be applied as broadcast, starter, surface
band or injected band applications. Any one
method may have its advantages under a
given set of plant nutrient demands, soil
characteristics, and fertilizer source-
12- Section I-B of the Technical Guide,
leaching index maps, demonstrates the
comparative leaching potential of soils of
North Carolina. These examples provide
the guidelines for assessing nitrate (NO3)
leaching risk and recommended
management programs. Use Section I-13 of
the Technical Guide, leaching index maps,
along with soils information for the field, to
Identify the potential for nitrogen loss.
a. The rate ofnitiification in North
Carolina soils is extremely rapid, the
leaching of NH4 is likely, the
a,,ailability of anhydrous is on the
decline, and the cost of pure nitrate
sources very high. Where high leaching
rates exist, and where appropriate for
the crop in question, nitrogcn use
efficiency and environmental safety can
be enhanced by using split applications.
b. On soils of inEet7ttediate leaching
potential, split and side dress nitrogen
applications are highly recommended
for best efficiency.
c. For soils with a leaching index (LI) of 2
or less, there is little concern for nitrate
leaching losses.
d. Erosion control and water management
practices shall be included to minimize
soil loss transport and runoff which may
carry attached and dissolved nutrients to
surface waters. This is of particular
importance where soils contain high
levels of phosphorous. Incorporating
nutrients into the soil generally reduces
the chance of loss in runoff in the
dissolved form.
13. Nutrientsfor a spring -planted crop shall not
be applied in fall or winter. Nutrients shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to
planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
14. Equipment shall be calibrated to apply
recommended rates on the field- Special
precautions must be taken to avoid well
contamination when using fertigation.

590-3
Tlie crops shoukrn in Table 1 arc the typical recommended crops fa,- waste utilization but is not an
inclusive list. Waste may be applied to other crops based on the nitrogen recommendation for R-.Y.E. as
shown in NC Cooperative Extension Service Crop Production Guides, the NRCS Agriculture Waste
Management Field Guide or the NC Agriculture Chemicals Manual.
Table 1. Nitro �cn fN1 pertilization Rates by Cron Yield
A range is sho%vn for N fertilization rates because N, uptake is dependent on the available water
holding capacity (AWHC) of the soil. AWHC is primarily determined by the soil's texture, percent
organic matter and rooting depth. Make your selection from the chart based upon the soil's texture,
inherent ability to produce, the occurrence of necessary conservation practices to protect the resource
base, and the landuser's historical crop production.
Crop INitrogen Recommendation
Wheat'
1.7 - 2.4 lbs. N/bu.
Barley'
1.4 - 1.6 lbs. N/bu.
Oats'
1.0 - 1.3 Ibs. N/bu.
Rye'
1.7 - 2.4 lbs_ N/bu.
Triticale'
1.4 - 1.6 Ibs. N/bu.
Corn-b ain
1.0 - 1.25 lbs. N/bu.
Corn -silage
10 - 12 Ibs. X'Aon
Sorghum -grain
2.0 - 2.5 lbs: Nfc,ut.
Soybeans'
3.5 - 4 Ibs, N/bu.
Cotton'
0.06 - 0.12 lb. N/]b. lint
Tobacco -Burley - See current year Burley Tobacco Information Guide available from North Carolina
Cooperative Extension Service.
Tobacco - Flue -cured - See current year Tobacco Information Guide available from the North
Carolina Cooperative Extension Service.
Sorghum-Sudangrass
Sudan grass
Pearl Millet
Bermudagrass (all areas of state)'
Tall fescue
Orchardgrass
Timothy
Crabgrass
Eastern Gamagrass
Rescuegrass._:
Small grain
Svvitchgrass'
Pine Trees
Hardwood Trees
45 - 55 lbs. N/ton hay
45 - 55 lbs. N/ton hay
45 - 55 lbs. N/ton hay
40 - 50 lbs. N/ton hay
40 - 50 lbs. N/ton hay
40 - 50 Ibs. N/ton hay
40 - 50 lbs. N/ton hay
40 — 50 Ibs. N/ton hay
40-50Ibs. N/ton hay
40 — 50 Ibs. N/ton hay
50 - 60 Ibs. N/ton hay
See footnote'
40 - 601bs. ac/yr
70-10b lbs. ac/yr
NOTE: Reduce all hay crop nitrogen rates by 25 percent when grazing. For ecch ton of hay harvested from a
pasture system the nitrogen application may be returned to the RYE (N) application rate for hay.
I When waste is to be applied to soybeans, it should be accomplished at preplant or planting. The crops entire nitrogen
needs should be met with this application
2 N rates in excess of 120 pounds per acre arc seldom justified for wheat, barley, oat, rye, triticale, and cotton. Do not
apply more than 100 pounds of N when overseeding small grain or Rycgrass into Bermudagrass.
3 The total Nitrogen application shall not exceed 120 Ibs. Per acre per year.
MRCS, NC

CONSIDERATfONS
This practice can reduce the likelihood
that applied nutrients would pollute
surface or ground water by limiting the
amount applied to only that needed.
Evaluate the vulnerability of
environmentally sensitive areas and
waters that have been stressed by the
presence of an over abundance ofplant
nutnents.
Good tilth enhances water infiltration,
thus reducing nutrient removal through
soil erosion. Also adequate soil water is
necessary for efficient nutrient use.
Conservation practices that manage plant
residues should be considered, i.e.:
Residue Management, No -till (324)
Residue Management, Seasonal (344)
Cover and Green Manure Crop (340)
Critical Area Planting (342)
Stbperopping (585 and 586)
Cover crops can be used as scavengers to
take up excess plant nutrients applied in
the previous season to prevent their
movement out of the root zone. Very little
of the scavenged nutrients are available to
the following crop, (usually <15% of the N
taken up). They should be harvested for
maximum benefit.
4. Organic .wastes can provide an important
source of nutrients. State and local
regulations,'the NRCS Agriculture Waste
Management Field Handbook, North
Carolina Cooperative Extension Service
(NCCES) Crop Production Guides, North
Carolina State University (NCSU)
Agricultural Chemical Manual, soil test
and waste analysis reports will provide
guidance concerning waste utilization.
5. Sources of plant nutrients may include
residual amounts in the soil, crop residues
including legumes, waste products, and
commercial fertilizer. Commercial
590--t
fertilizers are those products with a
guaranteed analysis under North Carolina
law.
6. Forage plants being used for nitrogen
uptake should be selected based on their
adaptation to the soil. Plants not adapted
to a site will have a short life and
maintaining a vigorous stand will be
difficult.
Plant tissue samples should be taken to
evaluate nutrient status and to support the
need for additional nutrient applications.
Excessive concentrations of one or more
nutrients may induce deficiencies. Soil
pH.should be maintained in the optimum
range for each crop to improve
availability of soil and applied nutrients
and to minimize the release of potentially
toxic elements.
C Factors from RUSLE can be more
effective in controlling water runoff than
LS and P Factors. C Factors effect root
distribution, soil temperature and a host
of other variables. Numerically low C
Factors buffer yields from climatic
variations most likely by improving
moisture status in the soil. The same C
Factors can increase the likelihood of
leaching losses. Consider the
environmental impact from increased
Inching.
10. Consider waste storage and treatment
needs to meet application timing as well
as land area requirements for proper waste
utilization.
11. 'Water table management through
controlled drainage reduces the movement
of nutrients by reducing total outflow
from a managed area and it also promotes
denitrification.
NRCS.NC
Pinar 1009

2.
M
590.5
12. Riparian buffers are very effective in
trapping subsurface nitrate entering a
stream and even sediment, but much less
effective in trapping r-anotf of soluble
phosphorus. Filter strips and grassed
waterways have little N retention
capacity. Grassed waterways do little to
reduce nutrients and sediments lost from
fields. Based on the most likely pollutant
sources for a site, consider specific
practices which are most likely to reduce
offske movement of those pollutants.
11 Loss of nitrogen from the soil is
dependent upon climate, soil, and
fertilizer application program, Normally,
with adequate soil moisture, nitrogen loss
potential can be reduced by applying
nitrogen fertilizer close to the time of
greatest crop demand. Split applications
may be needed to accomplish this.
Ammonium forms are taken up by plants
in significant amounts as nitrate within
days after application for most crops.
PLANS AND SPECMCATIO\S
Establish realistic yield goals based on soil
map units and the Soil Interpretation
Records; or historical yield data, or compute
by crop and soil combination the mean yield
of the three highest yields of the Iast five
consecutive crops.
Develop a nutrient management plan for the
crops to be grown. Account for the residual
amount of nutrients in the soil and crop
residue, including legumes add estimated
nutrients from anticipated organic waste
applications, and then determine the amount
of fertilizer needed to meet the nutrient
needs of the proposed crop and target yield.
Specify the crop, crop rotation, and kind,
source, application time and amount of plant
nutrients that will be used to meet the crop
fertility needs. Identify the priority nutrient
or nutrients.
If non -farm organic waste is to be used, it
shall be analyzed for content and applied as
prescribed by federal, state, or local
regulations. Appropriate documentation of
amounts applied should be maintained.
Frequency of soil test, waste analysis, and
plant tissue test shall be specified andm conforwith this standard.
Credit for nitrogen contributions frorn
legume crops in rotation shall be cor;ststent
with land grant university
recommendations.
Use the "Leaching Index for Soluble
Nutrients" procedure or other detailed
guidelines from land grant universities to
evaluate groundwater pollution potential in
conjunction with the water budget fpr the
location.
All specifications will be consistent with
state and local regulations.
8. A nutrizrrt budget will -be developed that
sho%v3 sources (soil residual, crop residues,
organic waste, chemical fertilizer, and
legume crops) and required amount(s) of
nutrient(s) for the crop to be grown. Use
the Nutrient Budget Worksheet (Exhibit
590-1 & 2) to document recommendations.
Indicate the priority planning nutrient(s) on
the %vorksheet. The worksheet shall show
the form of fertilizer to be used and the
application rates and method shall be
specified:
9. Nutrient application rates other than
nitrogen on agricultural land shall be based
on soil test and waste analysis, consistent
with the NCDA or NCSU
recommendations.
10. Nitrogen rates should be based on realistic
crop yield expectations and shall consider
all sources of nutrients that may be
availabIz as outlined in the attached nutrient
budget worksheet.
11. The following items should be included.
f7iose items marked with an asterisk shall
be recorded as minimum documentation
requirements.
• a. Location
NRC& NC-

b. Extent in acres
• c. Nutrient budget sheet
• d. Source of nutrients
' e. Nutrient timing and placement
i f. Soil erosion control
g. Equipment operation and
maintenance
lt. Safcty
i. Receiving water body (DEN ,-
DWQ Stream Classification [ndex
Number or other identifying
nomenclature).
j. When animal waste is utilized as
a nutrient source adhere to plans
and specificadons in Standard
633.
r OPERATION AND MJMTENAtvCE
1. Special precautions must be taken to avoid
well contamination when using fertigation.
2. Equipment should be cleaned after nutrient
application. Waste water resulting from
flushing application equipment should be
kept away from wells, streams, ponds,
lakes, or other water bodies and out of high
runoff areas. Follow all state and local
regulations concerning storage of materials
and disposal of product containers.
3. Avoid unnecessary exposure to hazardous
chemical fertilizer and organic wastes.
590-6
Protective clothing, including goggles, a
respirator, gloves and footwear should be
wom when handling potentially
daneerous materials.
4. Dispose of product containers in
accordance with local and/or state
regulations. Fallow all local, state, and
federal regulations regarding the transport
of fertilizers. In case of an accidental
fertilizer spill, call 91 1. The dispatcher
will notify the County Emergency
Manzgernent Coordinator who will notify
the State Emergency Management
Coordinator.
5. . Refer to Standard 633 for operation and
maintenance of an approved animal%vaste
utilization plan.
REFERENCES
Soil Facts, Nutrient Content of Fertilizers and
Organic Materials. The North Carolina
Cooperative Extension Service, 6191.
Soil Facts, Nutrient Removal by Crops in North
Carolina, The North Carolina Cooperative
Extension Service, 3/91.
N
MRCS. NC

r;xlnl)il i9O- 1
NUTRJENT BUDGET WQRKSHEET
Field number: Tract n: Acres:
Prepared by: County:
Dominant soil type: Soil Loss: Leaching potential—_1
Soil Loss Tolerance:
Previous crop- Yield- Realistic :=field
goal:
Planned crop:
Crop Needs
Circle PriMry Nutrients) N P2O5 K2O
(P-t x 4.896 = lb-s Pros) (K-t x 4,176 = Ibs K,O)
Soil test levels in lbs per acre
Nutrients required for yield goaVac
l . Soil Test Recommendations
from NCDA report or A
2. Recommendation from NCSU
Crop Production Guide or NC
Agr. Chemical Manual B
Nutrient Credits
Legume credit'-` n/a n/a C
Animal and organic waste"
Rate Type D
Total Credits E
Nutrient Balance
Nutrient needs (or surplus) for crop
F=AorB —E
Animal Waste
Animal waste -nutrient content
(kind)''-' lbs per ton or lbs per 1000 gal
(Method of Application)
F.
NRCS• NC

t=..hihic 590-2
Additional Documentation Durin 1 Planning
Source of additional nutrients needed
Time of nutrient application
1k1a(cr Quality Classifying Organization
\Vater Quality Classification
NOTES
Refer to Waste Utilization Standard (633) or Section a in North Carolina Agricultural Chemical
Manual for livestock manure production rates and nutrient content for broadcasted or
incorporated. If available, use waste analysis report Eom NCDA.
','hen the LI is medium or high you should consider alternatives that will reduce the potential for
leaching of soluble nutrients, consider timing of fertilizer application, split applications, and
afternative crops that require less nutrients.
=' Leaching Potential (High, Medium, Low) - Can be found in Section 1-13 of the Field Office
Technical Guide.
v Type of Waste - Broiler litter, Hog Lagoon, Dairy Slurry, etc.
' Not all nutrients from' previously applied animal wastes are used each growing season. For a
great part mineralization rates depend on soil proper#ies and climate. Remaining nutrients
from ptior applications of animal wastes can be determined from chapter 11, table 11-6 in the
Natural Resources Conservation Service's Agricultural Waste Management Field Manual.
-" Nitrogen from legume cover crops such as hairy vetch or legume crops such as soybeans or
peanuts grown the previous year. Make a choice from the range offered considering the vigor
or the legume crop, elapsed time from harvest or burndown, and the leaching potential of the
residual nitrogen based on the season and soil characteristics.
Cover Crops
Hairy Vetch 80-100 lbs/acre
Crimson Clover 60-75 Ibs/acre
Previous Year's Crop
C`-
yVy�.a....., tJ-JV AUJl•UI.jG
Peanuts 20-40 lbs/acre
Clover or Alfalfa Sod 80-100 Ibs/acre
MRCS, NC
rr mrr' ding

or
C:olloga nr A0#ICL;IIUJ& ann
cumptls 80c 1620
r1alo-10_ Nc 2769S- 7620-
B19-s15:!647
919_111j 79S! Val)
Mlemorandum
T O: Noah Carolina Cerified Technical Specialise
Ffz0IM: IqC State University Forage Production \Mork:eroulp
DATE July 13, 1998
SUBJECT: Crop Management Practices for Select Forages
Used in Waste Management
The f01fov.inl7 is a tour -page summary of suggestions for management practices [or some
forage crops that can be used in -)Waste managernerit plans. "These suggestions are a result of
discussions within the NC: State University Forage Production \ orkgroup, a group comprised
of I<C State faculty and NRCS agency personnel with expertise witb the crops.
There are Ilmated documented research responses of some of these practices on the many soils
and environments where these crops are currently being grown. The Forage Production
Workgroup has taken tIic available data and used the combined experiences and realistic
estimates of key people to come up with suggestions that wdl allow fanners to incorporate
these crops and practices into waste management plans. As data become available to
substantiate or refute. -'these suggestions, . [he Forage Production Workgroup will make
appropriate changes:'
Bermuda Overseeded With Cereal Rye and Annual Ryegrass
Currently two types of "ryegrass" are being used for winter overseeding in fields used for
animal waste management. Cereal r f , is a winter annual smallgrain that Iooks sa iilar to
wheat, barley and oats. Annual •e ras is a winter annual Crass that looks much like tall
fescue. Both of these grasses, when growing during ihL winter on berrr3a.tda sod, can have
significant impact on subsequent bermuda yields. In effect, the total yields from an acre
growing the combination of bermuda with these winter annuals will usually yield between 1-2
tons more per acre than bermuda growing alone for the year. Therefore, the total amount of
PAN /acre for the year is about 100 Ibs more than for bermuda alone. Although cereal rye and
annual ryegra_ss are suitable crops for overseeding, the management of the crops are different
and thus practices implemented are dependent on the crop selected_

Cfop 5r.1U;u;c
I)rvu: vnt�e,_r.f u•'•:
C043O.,I 01 A-_' =ulnrty Cnq t_rsn SCIOnCr,,,
cum�.u-, Boy
17h16,9r.. NC _ -c]b i6:0
919 1,15_264'
91u �;� 79---Q :cs!
T:');. cCrcaJ -vc shc,t:lu L r,l,tl,tCtJ by Ocmbcr 15 to prE ','3U-;e i-.: G('St C1pIx`:lL!1' 1 ?t_ _iL!
The most cor,�:sit!w ;lands are obtaned Ilt?ti drlliillg 1-ye 111(o jllt)l:
1? .rmtjdeLrc; - Sod D Uriflllt-, is not f}:)tij,C: !h �'.CdS ffi:v hc, bro IdCa_,:on S[it:'rl
bct mudii yod followed cukivailon Wilt) a dlSt ?r ll!11_'C ii-npl[_rllenl I h
1�: r hr,�adcast plantirin _ r' jt:=_> should lxe 1.5 tuna —: lliz rite for drills ! seed,;. ThL it;jt
aPplic.rlllon of anima! rile !s to be applied to tit_. 1>`rrn44ca prior to A:jgust
npl;Cation of 50 lbs/acre of P!--nt ,Available N (PAN) n>a}' b_- applied between Scj)temN:T ;5
altd October 30. ,ki adr_iioiial 50 lbs/acre of PAN rmiy bz apphed in l=ebrudn ?,,larch. If r've
o -)wLhr liarve-stcd on .i 1�" and goes not slgluflcaml' sliadc the bermuda, P.ALN ratYj for the
>ubsc:auent berrnud� CT' :_,1 ere 1:•ast:d on realistic yields c-f bermuda. A harvest is requ-red prior
to ]leading or Apid 7, w.-Lich ever comes first. Ti-Lis is rlccesszn to minirmize i.he potential tiai,.
shading bermuda and reducing its It The l'A1\ tell' for grazed systems ELith cerrrlydi+
o•,•erseeded with cereal rye _ must be reduced in accordance wlih MRCS T echrlical
Standard #590
Annual Ryegxass
Annual ryegrass should be plantzd by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter
growth. The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling ryegrass into shoe (less than 3
inches tall) berrnudagrasss sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short
bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate
for broadcast planting of seeds ' should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The )as[
application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda prior to August 31. An
application of 50 lbs/acrt of (PAN) may be -applied between September IS and October 30_
An additional 50 lbs/acre of PAN may be applied in February -March- If additional PAN is
applied to the ryegrass in April -May, the PAN rate for the bermuda must be reduced by a
corresponding amount- This is necessary because ryegrass growth during April -May u�il1
reduce bermuda "yields and shorten the rime bermuda can fully utilize the N. A harvest is
required by heading or April 7, which ever comes ftxst to prevent shading of emcrgmg
bermuda during April -May period. To favor the production of the bermuda, L-ddirional
harvests of ryegrass will be required when the ryegrass canopy reaches 12 to 15 inches height_
The PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda overseeded with annual ryegrass must be
reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical Standard #590.

+j Ir Life, -r.�Lv id Ntlah re'ulr-„
k:a.slern G( Mljfl'ass
Cu4109G of AUr.cu!1ur( j:..,
Cr,lnpus Aor 762C
rit-iwvf. NC
90 515 2W /
91u.515 7959 ir;LL.
l.lI117:id c!�,:I a,1' .i'+'i kibIc on [hi ._;1:('r,, Jt-paniai_jriiss I %-L'rof rN nnCl srrl [.•"r::'
in N,nlr C,ziohrt,i However. rrt ,:l 1r1-[ :r r d3tU is collecicd, -[-!c 1,01lov.-rng guideline,. n1;!.
lac u J
1 Oct S2: [,-Xo.t-cd tiUils th_:,t a.,_- w.-'i 'gain ur ci:cessivc
�-!tld :,t,: lfer to hybrid h;.rmltd = -ra,- Li sinular PAN rl1[.rs
2. On h::_;v ;extured soils tl:tt Llc NO. to somuwhat pooriv ul;s!nt: 1• ­afrtacyrass rrl�4 Sr i.:
3 rrr�;s more than hN,bi'id b: r rr[uL�_; y
�iar7��gra,s <=stablisho's .slov-dy anc. will not usually produce rrt:jch harle_c:table forage dur;n_
Ills t.strtbh l,nt'nt veiu.. It is best a1Jcw the oro%,.1h durut_., ill ;:-cdlinVT year to aecumulL� C:
IoF Most 0: ;!1 SC:ason; rl it is to 1. har ,� ,ted, it should be dome �(ieF Gill seedhead foc-n;atio:!_
on a rr[alority of the plants. Th?reforc, PAID! for the seedling year should be modificcl
1CGo:dlnoiy. O��erseeding garmagra:s With winter annuals is not currently ad�'lSed because tiL
har",cstinr- or ora7ing management of th:: winter alutual crops dining February -April would b-_:
detrimental to the survival o; ga:mgra;s. Gatrtagrass should riot normally be harvested or
gazed blow 6-8 inchcS stubble.
Application rates are to be based on the realistic N rates that address the N needs per ton of
hay, a realistic yield and an appropriate application window. When harvested as hay in the 24-
36 inch stage of growth, the N rate ranges from 40-50 lbslton of dry matter. The PAN rate for
grazed systems must be reduced in accordance with MRCS Technical Standard,#590.
The application window for gamagrass is slightly earlier than for bermuda; garnagrass starts
growing about 3-4 weeks earlier than Coastal bermudagrass and about 2-3 weeks earlier than
Tifton 4-4. Gamagrass is dormant from frost to March. The last application of PAN in the
summer should be prior to August 31.
Rescuegrass (i.e. Afatua)
Rescuegrass is a cool season. grass and makes most of its -To Aqh from March -June and
Sept ember -No vernber. It should raceive most of its N during the September -October and late
February through May months. Limited data are available for realistic yields of rescuegrass
on various soils and at various N levels in North Carolina. However, until further data is
collected the following suggestions may be useful.
1- On sandy., wcU drained to excessively drained soils, rescuegrass may yield 1.5- 3 times -
fescue, assuming a uniform and dense stand of grass is present.

r,,..• • .. .,. - C. ... u..
1•�:lelllrnitr i'. of C161: :r. :.:,.cc
,r �'•,.r,d�, �, r.t n I'rvh pt.. 1d ,�. rlr,r •r-•
l,l„Itr.
of AN, i[ulfuro,prlrl I IfI S_i„r,i�
fior /L,'(i -
G:7 ,5 JCr,%
�•.p _.1 7PS9 r1a�l
! 7S 1 rJ tjfnr-% c� MC-11 1ti If:till
jC, !L'SCLlC4?fGj� Ali:r1 1'il'l�
rn tioI , k!:�r,. h1�111 a.r{ ttfcll acf�Ipr.ecl the �1t°i ti n1 resc:i,:grosf11�}� s ^'
IIlan fcsCu
I S I1fr1C $� fIR)rC
Tl1c above ltl l ::sr',rri;rlLS 3stiumc [flat stand rr1.i._, 1s m;llntrllned :I�a'�1c`°!, ::;i;llf;ll r,}seedin`
c+'c.ry ��:lr. :1it!11 a°'!1 rescucfrass is a "pircr sal" it does rtot n,�lnt:rlrf ecflse. Sn[i5tactof�'
stanClS urllr_Ss II i,. �!1t�L' ed to reseed eery yeas 1::�•.:rl undf;r this ns- Daguffl rlt It Is fti.el� t�7:,t
dlse2-se %VdI atr�
:�ec+ r1r: Clr fllore '-Tow 'h S in son}_ ?curs
Application ra:� ire to be hascJ on the realistic N' rates that address 01c ' r:ce-ds per ton of
huh. rzaLlstr r ld arcl ,jn .1p;�iol�r7a[2 app,,I .;:tien ,L.uldow. %Vhen hw-vtStee as hay, th& N
r?te 3S 53r1771�r IC Other cool season grass 5 =ucf1 �5 fCSCue, rcrtn 1 t70rl 40-50 ]hs/tot1.
Rescuegrass njoy a!so contillue some gro%,.'th Ln June-AULUISi It rnolsture is
�d�.aelabl ethD Urr12-
thetie off-seasons- .escuegrass should not receive more [[ran about �5 iUS - c:
apply 25 Ibs Niacre U, )une-August it the cquI�-uierl[ of 1-inch of water car, Qe applied week
saw tune. If the crop does nor respond with at least a 1000 lbs of gro%k h wittlin a 3-S
period do not make anortier application until tht plants tta> e had [he opportunity to use the
pre%'ious application.

NCSU-MEMORANDUM PUMPING GUIDELINES
PUMPING DATES FOR BERMUDA WHEN OVERSEEDED SMALLGRAIN
USES HIGHER THAN 50lbs N/AC RATE
APRIL-AUGUST,31 (ONLY ACCEPTABLE PUMPING TIMES)
PUMPING DATES FOR SG(SMALLGRAIN) USING OVER 50lbs N/AC
RATES (BERMUDA SHOULD BE LESS THAN 3in TALL PRIOR TO
PLANTING)
SMALLGRAIN CROP SHOULD BE PLANTED BY OCTOBER,15
FIRST PUMPING [SEPTEMBER,15 THRU OCTOBER,30
(APPLICATION AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED 50lbsN/AC)
SECOND PUMPING [FEBRUARY THRU MARCH,311
(APPLICATION AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED 50lbsN/AC)
CROP MUST BE HARVESTED PRIOR TO HEADING OR
APRIL,7 WHICH EVER COMES FIRST

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY (DWQ) [phone]
EMERGENCY MANAGEMNET SERVICES (EMS) [phone]
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SWCD) [phone]
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS) [phone]
COOPERATIVE EXTERSION SERVICE (CES) [phone]
This, plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave you property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every
effort to ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible
location for all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should
take.
i . Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may ore may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed belwo.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that cause the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed
to flowing leaks -possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch from the embankment to catch all
seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
1

2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage notes, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g: Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours call your DWQ regional office; Phone - -. After
hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility number, telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2
above, the exact location of the facility,- the location or direction of movement of
the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been
under taken, and the seriousness of the sitution.
b, -If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phone number.
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Helath Department.
d. Contact CEs, phone number - , local SWCD office phone number - -, and local
NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -.
4. if none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's Department and explain you
problem to them and ask the person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair or problem to minimize off-
_ site damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address
c. Contractors Phone:
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting
Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: , - N lZ C-5
b. Phone: !I W _4 44 .2 12.0
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste managment plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
2

SWINE FARM WASTE MANAGEMENT ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST
Source Cause BMP's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead Swine production LJ.15roewatiVO or wooded buffers;
( ecommended best management
practices;
(4,Gra�ood judgment and common sense
Animal body surfaces Dirty manure -covered animals ( )- ry floors
Floor surfaces Wet manure -covered floors f 71-Sighed floors;
( eterers located over slotted floors;
( ) Feeders at high and of solid floors;
UAcr pe manure buildup from floors;
( nderfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits Urine (*Trequent manure removal by flush,pit
re arge,or scrape
Parital micorbial decomposition nderfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fans Volatile gases;
Dust
maintenance;
ient air movement
Indoor surfaces
Oust
(LXashdown between groups of animals
{ I Feed additives;
() Feeder covers;
(I Feed delivery downspout extenders to
feeder covers
Flush tanks
Agitation of recycled lagoon
(1 Flush tank covers
liquid whiles tanks are filling
Extend fill lines to near bottom of
tanks with anti -siphon vents
Flush alleys
Agitation during wastewater
nderf{oor flush with underfloor
conveyanance
ventilation
Pit recharge points
Agitation of recycled lagoon
( I Extend rechard lines to -near bottom of
liquid while pits are filling
pits with anti -siphon vents
Lift stations
Agitation during sump tank filling
( I Sump tank covers
and drawdown
Outside drain collection Agitation during wastewater { i Box covers
or junction boxes conveyance
End of drainpipes at lagoon Agitation during wastewater ( xtend discharge point of pipes
underneath lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces Volatile gas emissions ( �Mii
er lagoon liquid capacity
Biological mixing (}ect lagoon startup procedures
Agitation I um surface area -to -volume ratio
{ inimum agitation when pumping
{ ? Mechanical aeration
(I Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler nozzles High pressure agitation (-KE gate on dry days with little or no wind
Wind draft ( imum recommended operation pressure
( Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
( ) Pump from second -stage lagoon
AMOC--Ndvember 11, 1996

Storage tank or basin Partial microbial decomposition ( ) Bottom or midlevel loading
surface Mixing while filling ( ) Tank covers
Agitation when emptying ( ) Basin surface mats of solids
( ) Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface Partial micobial decomposition { ► Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
Mixing while filling level
Agitation when emptying {) Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge Agitation when spreading (I oo injection of slurry/sludges
spreader outlets Volatile gas emissions (}'wash residual manure from spreader after use
1 ) Pryen biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure, slurry Volatile gas emissions while drying { 9k i infection of slurry/sludges
or sludge on field surfaces ='read
incorporation within 48 hours
in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
() Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals Carcass decomposition ( roper disposition of carcasses
Dead animal disposal Carcass decomposition O Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits
pits () Proper location/construction of disposal pits
Incinerators Incomplete combustion ( ) Secondary stack burners
Standing water around Improper drainage (44rade and landscape such that water drains
facilities Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter /
Manure tracked onto public Poorly maintained access roads (Harm access road maintenance
roads from farm access
Additional Information: Available From:
Swine Manure Management; 0200 Rule/BMP Packet
NCSU-County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies, EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU-BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management; Pit Recharge --Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 128-88
NCSU-BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management. Underfloor Fluse--Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129-88
NCSU-BAE
Lagoon Desig and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
NCSU-SAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU-BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33
NCSU-Swine Extension
Environmental Assuranc Program: NPPC Manual
NC Pork Produces Assoc
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force
NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PR0107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Florida Cooperative Extension
The issues checked ( - pertain to this operation. The landowner/integrator agrees to use sound judgment in applying
odor control measures as practical.
I certify the aforementioned odor control Best Managment Practices have been reviewed with me.
(Landowner Signature)
AMOC--November 11, 1996

INSECT CONTROL CHECKLIST FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS
Source Cause BMP's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
(liquid Systems)
Flush Gutters Accumulation of solids lush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated
s s from gutters as designed.
f Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and Pits Crusted Solids fW4aintain lagoons, settling basins and
pits where pest breeding is apparent to
minimize the crusting of solids to a depth
of no more than 6-8 inches over more than
101% of surface.
Excessive Vegetative Decaying vegetation I Maintain vegetative control along banks of
Growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
(Dry Systems)
Feeders Feed Spillage I ) Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the accumulation
of decaying wastage.
{) Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g. 7-10 day
interval during summer, 15.30 day interval during winter).
Feed Storage Accumulations of feed residues {) Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
insuring drainage away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products).
{) Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed.
Animal Holding Areas Accumulations of animal wastes I I Eliminate low area that trap moisture along fences
and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
and disturbance by animals is minimal.
{) Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e. inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids as needed).
AMIC--November 11, 1996

Dry Manure Handling Accumulations of animal wastes I 1 Remove spillage on a routine basis {e.g. 7-10 day
Systems interval during summer; 15-30 days interval during
winter} where manure is loaded for land application
or disposal.
{ } Provide for adequate drainage around manure stockpiles.
{ 1 Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated wastes
in filter stripes around stockpiles and manure handling
areas as needed.
The issues checked ( ertain to this operation. The landowner/integrator agrees to use sound judgment in applying
insect control measures as practical.
I certify the aforementioned insect control Best Management Practices have been reviewed with me.
(Landowner Signature)
CkA (rIf S Ed wa,43 (31 - �6 1
(Farm Name)
(Facility Number)
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
27695-7613.
AMIC--November 11, 1996

MORTALITY MANAGEMENT METHODS
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
( } Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours
after knowledge of the death. The burial be at least 300 feet from
any flowing steam or public body of water.
( L4 Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G. S. 106-168.7
( ) Complete incineration
{ } In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and
design approved by the Department of Agriculture.
( } Any method which in the professional, opinion of the State
Veterinarian would make possible the salvage of part of a dead
animal's value without endangering human or animal health. {Written
approval of the State Veterinarian must be attached}

System Calibration
Information presented in manufacturer's charts are based on average operation
conditions with relatively new equipment. Discharge rates and application rates
change over time as equipment gets older and components wear. In particular,
pump wear tends to reduce operating pressure and flow. With continued use,
nozzle wear results in an increase in the nozzle opening which will increase the
discharge rate while decreasing the wetted diameter.
You should be aware that operating the system differently than assumed in the
design will alter the application rate, diameter of coverage, and subsequently the
application uniformity. For example, operating the system with excessive pressure
results in smaller droplets, greater potential for drift, and accelerates wear of the
sprinkler nozzle. Clogging of nozzles can result in pressure increase. Plugged
intakes or crystallization of mainlines will reduce operating pressure. Operating
below design pressure greatly reduces the coverage diameter and application
uniformity.
For the above reason, you should calibrate your equipment on a regular basis to
ensure proper application rates and uniformity. Calibration at least once every
three years is recommended. Calibration involves collecting and measuring flow at
several locations in the application area. Any number of containers can be used to
collect flow and determine the application rate. Rain gauges work best because
they already have a graduated scale from which to read the application amount
without having to perform additional calculations. However, pans, plastic buckets,
jars, or anything with a uniform opening and cross-section can be used provided
the liquid collected can be easily transferred to a scaled container for measuring.
For stationary sprinklers, collection containers should be located randomly
throughout the application area at several distances from sprinklers. For traveling
guns,:sprinklers should be located along a transect perpendicular to the direction
of pull. Set out collection containers 25 feet apart along the transect on both
sides of the gun cart. You should compute the average application rate for all
no nuniformity of the application. On a windless day, variation between containers
of more -than 30 percent is cause for concern. You should contact your irrigation
dealer or technical specialist for assistance.
'Reprinted for Certification Training for Operations of Animal Waste Management Systems Manual

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE PLAN
Proper lagoon liquid management should be a year-round priority. It is especially
important to manage levels so that you do not have problems during extended rainy and
wet periods.
Maximum storage capacity should be available in the lagoon for periods when the
receiving crop is dormant (such as wintertime for bermudagrass) or when there are
extended rainy spells such as the thunderstorm season in the summertime. This means
that at the first signs of plant growth in the later winter/early spring, irrigation according to
a farm waste management plan should be done whenever the land is dry enough to
receive lagoon liquid. This will make storage space available in the lagoon for future wet
periods. In the late summer/early fall the lagoon should be pumped down to the low
marker (see Figure 2-1) to allow for winter storage. Every effort should be made to
maintain the lagoon close to the minimum liquid level as long as the weather and waste
utilization plan will allow it.
Waiting until the lagoon has reached its maximum storage capacity before starting to
irrigate does not leave room for storing excess water during extended wet periods.
Overflow from the lagoon for any reason except a 25-year, 24-hour storm is a violation of
state law and subject to penalty action.
The routine maintenance of a lagoon involves the following:
Maintenance of a vegetative cover for the dam.
Fescue or common bermudagrass are the most common vegetative
covers. The vegetation should be fertilized each year, if needed, to
maintain a vigorous stand. The amount of fertilizer applied should be
based on a soils test, but in the event that it is -not practical to obtain
a soils test each year, the lagoon embankment and surrounding areas
should be fertilized with 800 pounds per acre of 10-10-10, or
equivalent.
Brush and trees on the embankment must be controlled. This may be
done by mowing, spraying, grazing, chopping, or a combination of
these practices. This should be done at least once a year and
possibly twice in years that weather conditions are favorable for
heavy vegetative growth.
NOTE: If vegetation is controlled by spraying, the herbicide must not be allowed to enter
the lagoon water. Such chemicals could harm the bacteria in the Iagoon that are treating
the waste.
Maintenance inspections of the entire lagoon should be made during the initial filling of
the lagoon and at least monthly and after major rainfall and storm events. Items to be
checked should include, as a minimum, the following:
Waste Inlet Pipes, Recycling Pipes, and Overflow Pipes ---look for:
l . separation of joints
2. cracks or breaks
3. accumulation of salts or minerals
4. overall condition of pipes

Lagoon surface ---look for:
1. undesirable vegetative growth
2. floating or lodged debris
Embankment ---look for:
1. settlement, cracking, or "jug" holes
2. side slope stability ---slumps or bulges
3. wet or damp areas on the back slope
4. erosion due to lack of vegetation or as a result of wave action
5. rodent damage
Larger lagoons may be subject to liner damage due to wave action caused by strong
winds. These waves can erode the lagoon sidewalls, thereby weakening the lagoon dam.
A good stand of vegetation will reduce the potential damage caused by wave action. If
wave action causes serious damage to a lagoon sidewall, baffles in the lagoon may be
used to reduce the wave impacts.
Any of these features could lead to erosion and weakening of the dam. If your lagoon has
any of these features, you should call an appropriate expert familiar with design and
construction of waste Iagoons. You may need to provide a temporary fix if there is a threat
of a waste discharge. However, a permanent solution should be reviewed by the
technical expert. Any digging into a lagoon dam with heavy equipment is a serious
undertaking with potentially serious consequences and should not be conducted unless
recommended by an appropriate technical expert.
Transfer Pumps ---check for proper operation of:
I. recycling pumps
2. irrigation pumps
Check for leaks, loose fittings, and overall pump operation. An unusually loud or grinding
noise, or a large amount of vibration, may indicate that the pump is in need or repair or
replacement.
NOTE: Pumping systems should be inspected and operated frequently enough so that you
are not completely "surprised" by equipment failure. You should perform your pumping
system maintenance at a time when your lagoon is at its low level. This will allow some
safety time should major repairs be required. Having a nearly full lagoon is not the time
to think about switching, repairing , or borrowing pumps. Probably, if your lagoon is full,
your neighbor's lagoon is full also. You should consider maintaining an inventory of spare
parts or pumps.
Surface water diversion features are designed to carry all surface
drainage waters (such as rainfall runoff, roof drainage, gutter outlets,
and parking lot runoff) away from your lagoon and other waste
treatment or storage structures. The only water that should be
coming from your lagoon is that which comes from your flushing
(washing) system pipes and the rainfall that hits the lagoon directly.
You should inspect your diversion system for the following:
1. adequate vegetation
2. diversion capacity
3. ridge berm height

Identified problems should be corrected promptly. It is advisable to inspect your system
during or immediately following a heavy rain. If technical assistance is needed to
determine proper solutions, consult with appropriate experts.
You should record the level of the lagoon just prior to when rain is predicted, and then
record the level again 4 to 6 hours after the rain (assumes there is no pumping). This will
give you an idea of how much your lagoon level will rise with a certain rainfall amount
(you must also be recording your rainfall for this to work). Knowing this should help in
planning irrigation applications and storage. If your lagoon rises excessively, you may
have an inflow problem from a surface water diversion or there may be seepage into the
lagoon from the surrounding land.
Lagoon Operation
Startup:
Immediately after construction establish a complete sod cover on bare soil
surfaces to avoid erosion.
2. Fill new lagoon design treatment volume at least half full of water before
waste loading begins, taking care not to erode lining or bank slopes.
3. Drainpipes into the lagoon should have a flexible pipe extender on the
end of the pipe to discharge near the bottom of the lagoon during initial
filling or another means of slowing the incoming water to avoid erosion of
the lining.
4. When possible, begin loading new lagoons in the spring to maximize
bacterial establishment (due to warmer weather).
5. It is recommended that a new lagoon be seeded with sludge from a healthy
working swine lagoon in the amount of 0.25 percent of the full lagoon
liquid volume. This seeding should occour at least two weeks prior to the
addition of wastewater.
6. Maintain a periodic check on the lagoon liquid pH. If the pH falls below
7.0, add agricultural lime at the rate of 1 pound per 1000 cubic feet of
lagoon liquid volume until the pH rises above 7.0. Optimum lagoon liquid
pH is between 7.5 and 8.0.
7. A dark color, lack of bubbling, and excessive odor signals inadequate
biological activity. Consultation with a technical specialist is recommended
if these conditions occur for.prolonged periods, especially during the warm
season.
Loading:
The more frequently and regularly that wastewater is added to a lagoon, the better the
lagoon will function. Flush systems that wash waste into the lagoon several times daily are .
optimum for treatment. Pit recharge systems, in which one or more buildings are drained
and recharged each day, also work well.

Practice water conservation ---minimize building water usage and
spillage from leaking waterers, broken pipes and washdown through
proper maintenance and water conservation.
Minimize feed wastage and spillage by keeping feeders adjusted. This
will reduce the amount of solids entering the lagoon
Management:
Maintain Iagoon liquid level between the permanent storage level and
the full temporary storage level.
Place visible markers or stakes on the lagoon bank to show the
minimum liquid level and the maximum liquid lever (Figure 2-1).
Start irrigating at the earliest possible date in the spring based on
nutrient requirements and soil moisture so that temporary storage
will be maximized for the summer thunderstorm season. Similarly,
irrigate in the late summer/early fall to provide maximum lagoon
storage for the winter.
The lagoon liquid level should never be closer than 1 foot to the lowest
point of the dam or embankment.
Do not pump the lagoon liquid level lower that the permanent storage
level unless you are removing sludge.
Locate float pump intakes approximately 18 inches underneath the liquid
surface and as far away from the drainpipe inlets as possible.
Prevent additions of bedding materials, long-stemmed forage or vegetation,
molded feed, plastic syringes, or other foreign materials into the lagoon.
Frequently remove solids from catch basins at end of confinement houses or
wherever they are installed.
Maintain strict vegetation, rodent, and varmint control near lagoon edges.
Do not allow trees or large bushes to grow on lagoon dam or embankment.
Remove sludge from the lagoon either when the sludge storage capacity is
full or before it fills 50 percent of the permanent storage volume.
If animal production is to be terminated, the owner is responsible for
obtaining and implementing a closure plan to eliminate the possibility of a
pollutant discharge.
Sludge Removal:
Rate of lagoon sludge buildup can be reduced by:

proper lagoon sizing,
mechanical solids separation of flushed waste,
gravity settling of flushed waste solids in an appropriately designed basin, or
minimizing feed wastage and spillage.
Lagoon sludge that is removed annually rather than stored long term will:
have more nutrients,
have more odor, and
require more land to properly use the nutrients.
Removal techniques:
Hire a custom applicator.
Mix the sludge and lagoon liquid with a chopper -agitator impeller
pump through large -bore sprinkler irrigation system onto nearby cropland;
and soil incorporate.
Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland or
forageland; mix remaining sludge; pump into liquid sludge applicator; haul
and spread onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.
Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland or
forageland; dredge sludge from lagoon with dragline or sludge barge; berm
an area beside lagoon to receive the sludge so that liquids can drain back
into lagoon; allow sludge to dewater; haul and spread with manure spreader
onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.
Regardless of the method, you must have the sludge material analyzed for waste
constituents just as you would your lagoon water. The sludge will contain different
nutrient and metal values from the liquid. The application of the sludge to fields will be
limited by these nutrients as well as any previous waste applications to that field and crop
requirement. Waste application rates will be discussed in detail in Chapter 3.
When removing sludge, you must also pay attention to the liner to prevent damage. Close
attention by the pumper or drag -line operator will ensure that the lagoon liner remains
intact. If you see soil material or the synthetic liner material being disturbed, you should
stop the activity immediately and not resume until you are sure that the sludge can be
removed without liner injury. If the Iiner is damaged it must be repaired as soon as
possible.
Sludge removed from the lagoon has a much higher phosphorus and heavy metal content
than liquid. Because of this it should probably be applied to land with low phosphorus
and metal levels, as indicated by a soil test, and incorporated to reduce the chance of
erosion. Note that if the sludge is applied to fields with very high soil -test phosphores, it
should be applied only at rates equal to the crop removal of phosphorus. As with other
wastes, always have your lagoon sludge analyzed for its nutrient value.
The application of sludge will increase the amount of odor at the waste application site.
Extra precaution should be used to observe the wind direction and other conditions which
could increase the concern of neighbors.

Possible Causes of Lagoon Failure
Lagoon failures result in the unplanned discharge of wastewater from the structure. Types
of failures include leakage through the bottom or sides, overtopping, and breach of the
dam. Assuming proper design and construction, the owner has the responsibility for
ensuring structure safety. Items which may lead to lagoon failures include:
Modification of the lagoon structure ---an example is the placement of a pipe
in the dam without proper design and construction. (Consult an expert in
lagoon design before placing any pipes in dams.)
Lagoon liquid levels ---high levels are a safety risk.
Failure to inspect and maintain the dam.
Excess surface water flowing into the lagoon.
Liner integrity ---protect from inlet pipe scouring, damage during sludge
removal, or rupture from lowering lagoon liquid level below groundwater
table.
NOTE: If lagoon water is allowed to overtop the dam, the moving water will soon cause
gullies to form in the dam. Once this damage starts, it can quickly cause a large discharge
of wastewater and possible dam failure.

i ELF , • _.r ..+,4. �1 �.
_ •�� _ n- she �'• :.�k^' '.+t : yLL��,.

- A
' 4, r n '" f �: . '�"yx �r••rf a2�n'� �i� r_r�' e�gi�j,'�''gS:A.
",, xfr�.S. or Elev. or
!IM, z Sto, B.S.SSHA. Grade Rod Planned Elev.
Gs N
AkK
700
.'''•7i'�T''�>!'�;• � . it
s A&I-�e y •. O L ,:i�• �I CJ Q a + . hT.'^" 4"
rdi+
i }IA
1rr yzY. �r r }��.f •��y ��rar 1'f^ s'uJ�' � r a .,+ �� ', tb ;�� a 3rf1�Yt' - r'
��'' �,� ��e�< ref.- �y .J• $T' a ''S: t. ".4. Y,
s��s�1•�.7+fiMr'� _ i�l�eli1�1171r�'ir1����rrr��
Has
Y
II
®!
�I
r

USUA SOIL CONSERVA77ON SERVIC" {
i
FINAL CONSTRUCTION CIjI✓CK AND CERTIFICATION
FOR AI\'MIAL 1NIASTC TREATMENT LAGOON (359)
DESIGN DATA AND CONSTRUCTION CHECK DATA
.TBM ELEVATION FEET,--.
AS DESIGNED - AS BUILT. .
INSIDE TOP DIMENSION
DIKE TOP WIDTH
TOP OF DIKE
BOTTOM OF LAGOON
INSIDE SIDESLOPE •/` f i '
OUTSIDE SIDESLOPE
PIPE INVERT
CLAY LINER/CORE TRENCH
HAS LAGOON BEEN SEEDED TO PERMANENT VEGETATION YES .,-,-NO
DOES LAGOON MEET SCS MINIMUM STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
\VASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS AS OUTLINED IN PRACTICE CODE :359?
YES �_ NO
COMMENTS
SIGNATURE r�. '�, % TITLE rl rr DATE -15-
c

r
USDA SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
FINAL CONSTRUCTION CHECK AND CERTIFICATION
FOR ANINIAL «'ASTE TREATMENT LAGOON (359)
NAME
LOCATION 0�, _f 80� �� N+a�. rrts,� annrar_._ �,� )v Je•
! y
SIZE OF OPERATION FARROW TO' FEEDER
FARROW TO FINISH
FARROW TO WEAN
CONTRACTING COMPANY _i^nr 4 I x FEEDER TO'FINISH
WEAN TO FEEDER
OTHER
DESIGN DATA AND CONSTRUCTION CHECK DATA
TBM ELEVATION d FEET
AS DESIGNED
INSIDE TOP DIMENSION
97 x i f!.0
DIKE TOP WIDTH
12 I~t
TOP OF DIKE
_4c-/-. -3
BOTTOM OF LAGOON
3 2. 3
INSIDE SIDESLOPE
OUTSIDE SIDESLOPE
PIPE INVERT
L47. 6
CLAY LINERICORE TRENCH
: ,-:.,,.
HAS LAGOON BEEN SEEDED TO PERMANENT VEGETATION
AS BUILT-
YES ✓I- NO
DOES LAGOON MEET SCS MINIMUM STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS AS OUTLINED IN PRACTICE CODE 359?
YES NO ✓
COMMENTS4
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE )--23 -I L-
c

N't'ASTE TREATMENT LAGOON CONSTRUCTION CHECK FIELD
-)TES
f
r
BY:
Hc)uSt6,/ f2
Sta. B.S. H.I. F.S./RR- Elev.
TU h
- - j Lid
r1� •!� Sys +� !6.!
'
- 4�& 7f
LAGOON SKETCH (optional)
S,g
5, 5 K•
Y
rY
-r.
N
4 Li S ��
L,a 4 , c

ANZMUL • A-ILST2 HAIN_ FOR h . OR =2,-,N-ZZD FEEDLOTS
r
Pl-sass ret:Z= the C= leted for to the Division of r_-viro=antal ur_age_:.ent at
the add;aaa on tha ravarsa eidn of thia fog.
Name of farm (Please print):
Address: Da mi,•r WlQe�jRta'. &.�1a.[%:U�_ AJC_ ,6it's{ %
Phone No.:
County-
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude:$,4L JB. /]3 Y'1 " (required). Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.):
Design capacity (numher of animals) : !1 4 D
Average size of operation-(12 month population avg.) y4 O D
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres):
Tec'=ical Specialist certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 1SA NCAC 6F .COOS, 1 certify that the new or
expanded animal waste management systez:'as installed for the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets -the design, construction,
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 1SA NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001-,0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria-hazze_been verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party) ; access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stor water runoff events less severe than the 25-yea 24-hour
storm..
Nana of Tecraical Specialist (Please Pri�-}t) : ! aL%2-G• Jk
Affiliation: Eks A XL 4 ic✓ P G i9 VI -I ► Q .*- N
Address (Age_*icy) : Phone No. tfl d . Z
Signature: %V l �• �Lx �_ _ Dater
-=c--=c.c aa__-aa�a=--a-a-ma.av==c=sea=ate-��=rasa=acaa=cc �=aca.as_�_ac
Cwaer/va :ase= A�'eame :t
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. 1 (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. 1 (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through' a :pan -made conveyance or through
rurof' front a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved. plan will be filed at the fans and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
Nz: -e cf La--d Osr::ar (Please Print) :
Signature:
Date:
Nara of va"-ages, if different from owndV_- (Please print)-.
Signature- Date:
Note: A change in lard ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer.
DEM USE ON'LY:ACNLw#

PRODUCER CERTIFICATION OF IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
1, [)a ,,- ,¢ W �,y l .� / , certify that I (own, have access to) the
(producer)
following irrigation equipment: j
TYPE IRRIGATION AND SIZE
AVAILABLE FROM _ Dc% h l%•,l U
(owner Af equipment)
I further certify that, through the arrangements I have made concerning irrigation equipment, I
will be able to irrigate as necessary according to my waste management plan.
Signature
(producer)
Date / — 7
PRODUCER CERTIFICATION OF INTENT TO PLANT GRASS FOR
IRRIGATION
1• na n r U) 1vcA .. !4 , certify that I will plant the specified grasses
(producer)
as outlined in my waste management plan at the next available seeding date. If this seeding
date is in excess of 6 months from the date I stock animals, then I will provide a temporary
cover of small grain if needed for irrigation.
Signature b-V/" Date �11
(producer) el

United States Soii r. 0. Box 277
i Department of conservation Kenansville, NC 28349
Agriculture Service Telephone [phone]
0
WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY SITE EVALUATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
NAME LOCATION ()n f R 1 S 0 !
-2-13_1-Ym uh Iqd. cf 2,n,o%
TELEPHONE_CLIQ SIZE OF OPERATION��?, D Fra;(,��,.1�_l��._`
LOCATION DATA
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER ]'+0o, +- 6', t"'l )
NUMBER OF HOUSES WITHIN 2000 FEET OF SITE ) U
IS SITE WITHIN 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? YES NO ✓
IS SITE AT LEAST 100 FEET FROM A "BLUE LINE" PERENNIAL STREAM? YES ✓ NO
IS SITE WITHIN 1 MILE ZONING JURISDICTION OF A MUNICIPALITY? YES NO
if yes, landowner should consult with local zoning board about required permits
WETLANDS
WILL SITE INVOLVE CLEARING WOODLAND OR ANY NON CROPLAND? YES NO ./
IF YES, HAS PRODUCER COMPLETED AN AD-1026 FORM? YES NO
DOES NON WETLAND NEED TO BE MEASURED BY REGISTERED SURVEYOR PRIOR TO
APPROVING WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN YES NO ✓
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PRODUCER TO CONTACT THE US
ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND THE NC DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TO
DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL PERMITS ARE REQUIRED. NO WETLANDS SHOULD BE ALTERED UNTIL
PRODUCER RECEIVES WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM SCS, US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND NC
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
WASTE MANAGEMENT -- VALID ONLY ]IF WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN ATTACHED
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY LAND APPLY WASTE? YES ✓ NO
IF NO, DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE LAND? YES NO
SEE ATTACHED PLAN FOR SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS
SOU, INVESTIGATION -- VALID ONLY IF SOIL INVESTIGATION SHEET ATTACHED
IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR LAGOON? YES NO
IS A CLAY LINER REQUIRED? YES NO ✓
IF YES, IS CLAY AVAILABLE ONSITE? YES NO QUESTIONABLE
IS A CORE TRENCH REQUIRED? YES ✓ NO
SITE APPROVED YES ✓ NO CONDITIONAL
COiIINIENTS
APPROVAL BASED ON SCS STANDARDS VALID FOR 60 DAYS FROM DATE SIGNED. `I'1115 APPROVAL
nE: "�:7 C1I:L��i:'3 SaS:;i) O�' CII:\10EC Iti \:1`i'I4�\:1?,, �?',',`I";, �`.'. .. _., ,. .. .. .•.•`.
Thersoil�o seilrva�Eon�s�rvice (1 1•T;E`I' FROM RESIDENCE, Al' TINIE OF DESIGN.
is an agency of the .7
Department of Agriculture SIGNATURE �_.._. Yi CG•'! P��1'L�'-�

I
US Department of Agriculture NC -CPA 16
Soil Conservation Service 4-92
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Land User/Owner Qcty�;n!� WAA) u County o!,'j_
Location/Tract & Field Number %)Q,? J-, -;e-n ­3_ Acreage -Z
Prepared by �,cX �-�.� 1?sc r Date's?
Brief Description of Planned Practice/RMS/Project Measure:
Environmental Factors and Resources to Identify and Evaluate J
1. Is wetland included in the planning area: (References: NCPM;
190-GM 410.26; Hydric soils list; Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the U.S.; National Wetlands Inventory Maps;
NFSAM.
No
Yes - If yes,
Identify types present
--- Attach environmental evaluation showing what effect
planned assistance will have on wetland and how this
assistance is within policy
-= Hav ene eded permits (CAMA, DEM, Corps, etc.) been
obtained by the landuser?
-- Make sure no planned practices will put the landowner in
violation of Swampbuster
2. Endangered and/or threatened species: (References: 190-GM
410.22; Technical Guide Section I-i(13) and Section I-vii
No Yes
Identify species whose range and habitat needs indicate
they might occur in planning area
-- Identify on map any designated critical habitat

3. Is a designated natural or scenic area included in the planning
area or will planned actions impact on an adjacent natural or
scenic area? (References: 190-GM 410.23 and .24)
L,-' No
Yes - If yes, encourage landuser to consult with concerned
agencies:, societies, and individuals to arrive at
mutually satisfactory land use and treatment.
4. Does the. planning area include. the 100-year flood. plain?.
(References.:. N.CPM,;, 19-0.-GM 410.25; HUD Flood Plain. maps):.
✓ No
Yes If yes,
-- Is the assisted
-action likely to have. significant
adverse
effects.on existing natural and beneficial
values. in
the flood plain?
-- Is there
a practical alternative-outside.the flood
plain -?-
Has the
flood plain.been used for agricultural
production
for at least 3. of the -last 5 years?
5.
Is an archaeological
or historical site located -in the, planning
area? (References:
NCPM.;. 420-GM 401.;- National Register. of
Historic Places)
No
Yes - If -yes,.
have steps. been: taken• to ensure the
protection of
this area?,
5.
Are there any prime,
unique, or locally- important farmlands in
the operating unit?*
(;References: 310-GM).
No
Yes - If yes,
identify on a soils map or legend./16/� /11z
7.
Will the action result in sodbusting?
�-� No
Yes
8.
Will the action result in swampbusting?
No
Yes,
9..
Is there a potential-
for controversy,? From whom?�
No
✓ Yes,

I
10. Are permits required?/Should the person contact permit agencies?
No ✓ � Yes
J When an environmental factor or resource is identified on the
site, the user will refer to the appropriate reference for policy
and document the appropriate action in the notes portion of this
form.
NOTES, DOCUMENTATION, FOLLOW-UP

�ut-C PSWCD 1
L' il Cf1 CiLfiS :�';'�"'LICAT ION' TES
I. S ." ,PLE COLLECTION'
4:
A. Liquid Manure Slurry
1. Under -slotted -floor pit
a. Use a length of 1/2" conduit open on one end and that can be
easily sealed on the other end (e.g., by placing one's thumb
over the end of the conduit).
b. With both ends of the conduit open, extend it into the manure
to the pit floor.
c. Seal the upper end of the conduit trapping the manure that has
entered the lower end, remove and empty into a bucket or container.
c. Collect samples from at least 5 locations or at least enough
for a total of 1 quart of slurry.
e. Thoroughly mix this slurry and empty approximately 1/2 pint
into sample container.
2. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. make sure the manure has been well mixed or homogenized with a
liquid manure chopper -agitator pump or propeller agitator.
b. Take samples from approximately 5 locations in the pit, from the
agitator pump, or from the.manure spreader and place.in a bucket.
c.-': Thoroughi.y, mix and empty 1�y2l pint into sample container.
II. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place the sample for analysis into a flexible or expandable container that
can be sealed. The container should be rinsed clean with water and free
of any residues but should not be chlorinated or. treated in any other way.
Dry litter may also be placed in a sealed plastic bag"such as a freezer bag.
B. The sample should be refrigerated, iced or cooled, if possible, or trans-
ferred to the lab immediately.
C. viand -delivery is the most reliable way of sample transfer, but it can also
be .mai 1 ed.
D. If mailed, sample container should first be protected with a packing material
such as newspaper, then boxed or packaged with wrapping paper and taped.
E. The NCDA Plant Analysis Lab provides this service for a nominal fee of
$4 per sample which should be fc�rwarftd along with the sample.

r�
PSWCD 1
1. Address: C_ Department of Agriculture
Plant Analysis Lab -" #
Agronomic Division
Blue Ridge Road Center
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr, Ray Campbell
P. Request that as a minimum the following analyses be performed:
1. Total nitrogen (TKN)
2. Ammonia nitrogen -(NH N)
"3. Total phosphorus .(TP}3
4. Potassium .(K)
5. Dry litter samples should also include a total solids (TS) analysis.
G. Other analyses performed at no extra cost by HCDA include trace minerals.

)i; L l
0
PSyCD 2
I. S`.'-TLL
L. Lagoon Liquid
1. Collect approximately 1/2 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from the
inflow pipe to the flush tanks.
2. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on the end of a 10-15
foot long pole.
b. Extend the bottle-10-15 feet away from the bank edge.
c. Brush away any floating scum or debris so it is not collected
with sample.
d. Submerge the bottle within 1 foot of the liquid surface.
e. Repeat at approximately 5 locations around the lagoon, place
into a bucket, thoroughly mix, and empty 1 pint into sample
container.
3. From a multi -stage lagoon system collect sample from lagoon that
is going to be irrigated from.
II. SPJ1PLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place the sample for analysis into a flexible or expandable container that
can be sealed. The container should be rinsed clean with water and free
of any residues but should not be.chlorinated or treated -in any other way.
Dry litter may al s'o be placed in sealed plastic bag such as a freezer bag .
B. The sample should be refrigerated, iced or cooled, if possible, or trans-
ferred to the lab immediately.
C. Hand -delivery is the most reliable way of sample transfer, but it can also
be mailed.
D. If mailed, sample container should first be protected with a packing material
such as newspaper, then .boxed or packaged with wrapping paper and taped.
E. The NCDA Plant Analysis -Lab provides this service for a -nominal fee of
$4 per sample which should be forwarded along with the sample.
1. Address: N. C. Department of Agriculture
Plant Analysis Lab
Agronomic Division
Blue Ridge Road Center
Raleigh, NC 27611
(919) i33-2655
..^."n: !}r. P,,:} Campbell
LZ

t
PSWCD 2
F ReyuesL i:IldT cS a i l'ziliIuj11 C: Ie C� 110;ri lid cilu l�'$L5
E- r.er7ormed : I
1. Total nitrogen
2. Arrumonia nitrogen NH N)
3. Total phosphorus NH
4. Potassium (K)
S. Dry litter samples should also include a total solids (TS) analysis.
G. Other analyses performed at no extra cost by NCDA include trace minerals,
1

wit .
.N - � i� Y. '1xr s r } '�,4 .,'!S ? tom. �•� , + �M y�'- � • r r � �y�
•i r i _ itri ' �T �� i r�',;y `Yr+ti q�••
Y —. %,. a'�•,£t� did Z j.Awe..ft " �. 5 z ' zloc
". �F� k r 1 ~ ' •a ._ �y i
zi�^'b•S, 14N
ry� ,r%�J. 1r r! 'iit ! r r !( ",: t . yi,.4 y f?yT1 C Z` s e < f , )t:'
,f ��+ 1 � ~r • S w ]' h '�. �:'V' `• d-{ r i , r 'y:'. V �jJ 1 2�� l ♦
{� t t�+j��p 4 Y r ?� '• ttr fr �"�i S. e L 7 Y
,-%�i'S� �! ))r-�, �lw�•cr;`•����i� e�'f�.{ �l .� 't1e. 'I ".� .'1. ��' *r hekr� SY FF.+A r \w,r ;�f )� rl y .'�`��r
•r., �, .,s }.e£,f"r'�:. -:. y-tT�,T•.y�3 t1 _ y ,�, �'lr� �... r, •!.1 ,�.-- - 4f' �i •ref' !ti �'
i �j )} .��..��"��"�� . , �] �;t v..• f. �, .*�>7• N ti 1 s,7'' 11� e' ♦ls
•�y�^'r T f� ,1, SyyS'� YyY� ! 4 '��1 i-14.Y� ! r+}'' f [•1 ��•�S �r`S � f , � J' ' 1 . • r r Y, !� �.1� �, f . F -'•t•� '• 14 � � � w. f
'rtC' � ri.'i • r` r ?F'�'• 'i Yt7y �� t 3 � Rti r 74� tiy. 3� f M � r'•��.4.�'. .�' L .r v .r'i S � r � I� }S rt
'� �y1 � �, ;` � 7%. •`^" .•'e � A i y'a' �� r u: �l L.".. �i #[r � s 1 . S ,r \ . r.'w, � '�R 4r °r.j„
:a, ti• .l1�tC.•i �k'�`" } �q �, •Y�,� ' S. - .�G .i ' .:-•�, `l •SM! r
v •r!.�1'+}r F{ ��r," ''r3 f1] 4�,\'4-",: +"` tJ- w,��f�$t4 , �:, ,�ry�l"�{l!',�t"+; ''t} -.�J 7"-�'..•, '1�� • ".1,+. � a `•� ��'�17r•'+
�'`rf rr� �' �.. 'a f =jti. `(.���: 0 ayp. sr „wy ,s, •'�,_ � ♦ i ,•� '*��.'"r� J ,
i,m��:} t � � rti � S �� ti ti c .Y� �� tt:' �.. .•_C•'' 4 / t':1 7� h�
�„ � li'�rr c S �. � to 1:r � 4 M r �'�"S L �1 �� "rr ` 4 ,��y •5 ,�'.• � �lr{ti
i•.�i -�*� t �F•:�. f .:,` ' ?R.1 •, {Sr's + ` r ,: }••'j� '� • ���rs %ri ,haY `t.' [ ,r,� 'F� i r; ri �. t
r, y '`'rn i yF, .i„�., ,'� * '', r 7. ""�• •tk S` � �^ ? •`« i -'� "irirwi
�`� C. �`-•,�rf, ! � �yri-2 ..•rr-)Yr..w,• iT�T tea.-r.•%/' h• � � 1 � ,
"iV .r 1\Y; r.1., •1� � •. � W 5 . 1• �' . i ! - 15 ,
A
.�: i, .." i' z ; F 1t lei' '.•uy ;}•"2:Y!' rt}�• .. �^ �•T,'r �' r �
Ssy�iY{r1 • 'L -/` i,i 'i j.1 •� al�� t a. '1�, '�i
3;I i rd � �' �!} ,�, ]•� wr .; Y (�i7' �;�.. }'� t+•' i.E.ri , r } ;,,,e"ti •
l'r � �� •y } 1vr}.��. •�''`V � .. ,t'•' � r e;
pi
VWPI
+` COA ' *x, iY �, -.i s f � • " f �� i.� �%'l � '" `i, ir'�`",�T �] f r , j � r
.°d''.i,ri�rt 'r•y ��� F.r �'I5 F,l L'r,,' "�.r •r0� •r`` - *y y ir, �{y} �'•� n?
�`ri •r••'' U -I1R � •o- �• . 't•il ,���� F 1V�. 41i'�1i i�\,'; �,+�o'h.�, &=�
r1 :lM.:,S, 3 i r s, '. •. } 1 µ ri ''r ` +'•-i '���v
.�• "1 > >k f jam:• e'er 1 �S,vi �• �'+c�' "� v�r'!#+'.
��, �R{}•Y a �Fr S- •y �.���� Y �r�. 1 �� • , F�� � a • ! 1Y1 �"�ti �
-:'r- 1Mr } ..1 ,1. �i 79 'r"�'+r�:��-f Lit+'• r.r., :_. :'r.
lIV;5, �ti �1i r; ��'.' ` • 5.1,.,;§a y �':�,ytl
1 >rx1'� - , �I' S1F�yL� iR F ] },, ,: a '. •j�'.`;'.,, .k�
aaj'4ir a'?��Sr
t a �[ a•''S I,r�fr,5'. � -+,F r � '3 _ r ♦n •�1" t a s+ �- 'i.e �••a. r
' .r�'i •,l1 •• Yam•. rA _ +ir ,1�, � �� r5: �., r r w5� i"
'� A/�.. Y , rY ' r 4 ���-r�s--R fr•. �,. �"'S rra Doti f
� Jli7: _ +'H' i �.t � �yl �'h .f i ` �, S i �'•t,�,r.
� t��y�� e !Ci { -?.; ': r; •t r y4 s r• r- -r t +�' �{5�,+�
• �i "��„LS (�. {}ice,'. ,F �r.+r �7 � � , � 1 ��f't. 1 7% , , r s''a � r��'f
;'4 r•s r r + r>;i r, '„ •)' , � r S y t nr v'�„�t � �^
r,+„,� "1j: i• A. yt ti ;tyi •.:» %r r� ;- S ,. ar �� J � �.
�. 1 �,'� Fi .Y. q £ 4�.• .,.w (5� r�,ir;'�r���l� ;9a�• rl��..
i�tipI' �'•1 �'� r'C �� Y `� a �`1
� h�i'. �r .. .. L�AVYr• w S.T.'

R �
o
y3
uj:
a�

i
420 CH
FE
4$6
3863
34*52'3(YT
77
IX"
QIII
Ce
—2YF4
Piney Gm
ern
cit
em
= �. %
I1
4 j I
.-Cem .
27.0
BM 27.9
_7
T
-71
BM
26�9
xm
2
(17�
2a 5
i66
At
7
%
Zip
ac M
10
T
- A
%
24&-,
N
ism
27.5
- -zm
tore
2XV
Y
ern
ARI 2 49
C dar r k
151
Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Survey
Control by USGS, NOSINOAA, and North Carolina Geodetic Surrey
Topography by photogrammetric methods from aerial ph o*tographs
taken 1977. Field checked 1979. Map edited 1980
Projection and 10,000-foot grid ticks: North Carolina coordinate
system. (Lambert conformal conic}
252 42, 30"
1000
GN
124 41 102

- --- � _- ,--------------_ :. :_---;/lair`;--f,�jr:=1�G,��_
1c

t
United States
y Devartment of
Agriculture
Conservation
Service
OPERATOR: ' 1 r►e', WhCk1Pv
— r
Please review the attached plan and specifications carefully. Retain
this plan for your use and records. It is strongly recommended that you,
your contractor, and Soil Conservation Service personnel are in agreement
as to how the waste lagoon is to be constructed. The Soil Conservation
Service personnel will meet with all concerned parties and walk over the
site to explain all flags and markings. It is important that everyone
understand what is expected so that final construction meets plans and
specification and the job can be certified' for payment OF cost -sharing
is involved).
The pad dimensions and grades are the best estimate. The BUILDER or
CONTRACTOR is RESPONSIBLE for final layout and design of the pads. The
Soil Conservation Service personnel will assist in a limited capacity,
as its major concern is the proper design and construction of the waste
treatment lagoon.
The actual amount of material required for pads and'dam may vary from the
estimates. The design will attempt to balance cuts and fills as close as
possible. If additional material is required after construction is complete
on the lagoon, the -contractor and owner will negotiate on the price and
location of borrow area.
NOTE: Design Requirement: `7Sr z,.� cu.ft. ;r r, cu.yds.
Estimate of Excavation: cu.ft. = u.yds.
Estimate of Pad & Dike: cu.ft. = u.yds.
0 Ration
Job Class
Date
Designed By [ !i , ». P Z /'/,__ -i.
Name
Design Approval /J
Name
Da te'
OlJ the Sod Conservaticn 5ernce
this an agency of e
Oecartment of Agriculture

r i E
US Department of Agriculture NC -CPA 16
Soil Conservation Service 4-92
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Land User/Owner County
Location Tract & Field Number T i9r f J Acreage___q9-2 z-
Prepared bDate
Brief Description of Planned Practice/RMS/Project Measure:
Environmental Factors and Resources to Identify and Evaluate J
1. Is wetland included in the planning area: (References: NCPM;
190-GM 410.26; Hydric soils list; Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the U.S.; National Wetlands Inventory Maps;
NFSAM.
✓ No
Yes - If yes,
-- Identify types present
-- Attach environmental evaluation showing what effect
planned assistance will have on wetland and how this
assistance is within policy
--- Have needed permits (CAMA, DEM, Corps, etc.) been
obtained by the landuser?
-- Make sure no planned practices will put the landowner in
violation of Swampbuster
2. Endangered and/or threatened species: (References: 190-GM
410.22; Technical Guide Section I-i(13) and Section I-vii
No Yes
-- Identify species whose range and habitat needs indicate
they might occur in planning area
-- Identify on map any designated critical habitat

I
3. Is a designated natural or scenic area included in the planning
area or will planned actions impact on an adjacent natural or
scenic area? (References: 190-GM 410.23 and .24)
✓ No
Yes - If yes, -encourage landuser to consult with. concerned
agencies, societies, and individuals to arrive at
mutually satisfactory land use and treatment.
4. -Does the planning area include the 100-year flood .plain?
(References: NCPM; 190-GM 410.25; HUD Flood Plain maps)
No
Yes - If yes,
-- Is the assisted action likely to have significant
adverse effects on existing natural and beneficial
values in the flood plain?
-- Is there a practical alternative outside the flood
plain?
-- Has the flood plain been used for agricultural
production for at least 3 of the last 5 years?
5. is an archaeological or -historical site located in the planning
area? '(References: NCPM; 420-GM 401; National Register of
Historic Places)
No
Yes - If yes, have steps been taken to ensure -the
.protection of this area?
6. Are there any prime, unique, or locally important farmlands in
the operating unit? (References: 310-GM)
V/
No
Yes - If yes, identify on a soils map or legend. Nor`.
7. Will the action result in sodbusting?
V No Yes
S. Will 'the action result in swampbusting?
No Yes
9. Is there a potential for controversy? From whom?
No f Yes 14" vjrf,:. ,.:14 2f=

10. Are permits required?/Should the person contact permit agencies?
No Yes
J When an environmental factor or resource is identified on the
site, the user will refer to the appropriate reference for policy
and document the appropriate action in the notes portion of this
form.
NOTES, DOCUMENTATION, FOLLOW-UP

i
Operator:Danny Whaley County: Duplin Date: 06/11/92
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner): 1400.0 feet
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
0
sows
(farrow to
finish)
x 1417
lbs.
= 0
lbs
0
sows
(farrow to
feeder)
x 522
lbs.
= 0
lbs
3520
head
(finishing
only)
x 135
lbs.
= 475200
lbs
0
sows
(farrow to
wean)
x 433
lbs.
= 0
lbs
0
head
(wean to feeder)
x 30
lbs.
= 0
lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = 475200 lbs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 475200 lbs. SSLW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW= 1 CF/lb. SSLW
Volume = 475200 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
4. TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME
Not computed at landowner's request
Sludge will be removed as needed.
Inside top length 370.0
feet ;
Inside top
width 280.0 feet
Top of dike at elevation
54.0
feet
Freeboard 1.0 feet ; Side
slopes
3.0 :
1 (Inside lagoon)
Total design lagoon liquid
level at
elevation
53.0 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation
44.0
feet
Seasonal high water table
elevation
47.0 feet
Total design volume using
prismoidal
formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1
SS/SIDE2
LENGTH
WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0
3.0
364.0
274.0 9.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
364.0 274.0
AREA OF BOTTOM,
LENGTH * WIDTH =
310.0 220.0
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
337.0 247.0
99736.0 (AREA OF TOP)
68200.0 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
332956.0 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = [AREA TOP +.(4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM)
99736.0 332956.0 68200.0
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT TOTAL DESIGN LIQUID LEVEL =
* DEPTH/6
1.5
751338 CU. FT.

A
5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
370.0 280.0 103600.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
Length * Width =
0.0 0.0 0.0 square feet
TOTAL DA 103600.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Approximate daily production of manure in CF/LB SSLW 0.00136
Volume = 475200 Lbs. SSLW * CF of Waste/Lb./Day * 180 days
Volume = 116047 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallons
per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 60433.3 cubic feet

5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.5 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 64750.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 116047 cubic feet
5B. 0 cubic feet
5C. 60433 cubic feet
5D. 64750 cubic feet
TOTAL 241230 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
Total required volume 716430 cubic feet
Total design volume avail. 751338 cubic feet
Min. req. treatment volume plus sludge accumulation 475200 cubic fe
et
At elev. 50.1 feet ; Volume is 477908 cubic feet (end pumping)
Total design volume less 25yr-24hr storm is 686588 cubic feet
At elev. 52.3 feet ; Volume is '682457 cubic feet ( start pumping)
Seasonal high water table elevation .47.0 feet
�}n LX
7. DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY :
DATE: S �26� q Z DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN

OPERATION -AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
------------------------------
This lagoon is designed for, waste treatment with minimum odor
control. The time required for the planned fluid level to be
reached may vary due to soil conditions,flushing operations, and
the amount of fresh water added to the system.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent runoff from the field or damage
to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment B)
before land application.
3. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches eleva-
tion -52.3 as marked by permanent markers. Stop pump -out when
the fluid level reaches elevation f 50.1 or before fluid depth is
less than 6 feet deep (this prevents the loss of favorable
bacteria) .
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.4
inch per hour.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
----------------------------------------------------------
Clearing:
All trees and brush shall be removed from the construction area
before any excavating or fill is started. Stumps will be removed
within the area of the foundation'of the embankment and fill areas
and all excavated areas. All stumps and roots exceeding one (1)
inch in diameter shall be removed to a minimum depth of one (1)
foot. Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The
foundation area shall be loosened thoroughly before placement of
embankment material.
Cut-off Trench:
---------------
A cut-off trench (when specified) shall be installed as shown in
the plans.
Construction:
Construction of excavated and earthfill areas shall be performed to
the neat lines and grades as planned. Deviations from this will
require prior approval of the SCS. Earthfill shall not be placed
in standing water and reasonable compaction of the fills shall be
performed by the construction equipment or sheeps-foot roller during
placement. The embankment of the lagoon shall be installed using
the more impervious materials. Construction of fill heights shall
include ten (10) percent for settlement. To protect against seepage,
when areas of unsuitable material are encountered, they will need to
be excavated a minimum of one (1) foot below grade and backfilled and
compacted with a suitable material (ie-CL,SC,CH). Refer to the soils
investigation information in the plans for special considerations.
Precautions should be taken during construction to prevent excessive
erosion and sedimentation.
Vegetation:
All exposed embankment and other bare constructed areas shall be
seeded to the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after
construction.

I
SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS
-----------------------
AREA TO BE SEEDED: 4.0 ACRES
USE THE SEED MIXTURE INDICATED:
0 LBS. FESCUE GRASS .@ 60 LBS./ACRE
(BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER 15 TO NOVEMBER 30
0 LBS. 'PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS @ 60 LBS./ACRE
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1)
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO .TUNE 30
t
32 LBS. HULLED BERMUDA GRASS @ 8 LBS. /AC.
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO JULY 31
120 LBS. RYE GRAIN @ 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
0 LBS. RYE GRASS @ 40 LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMBER 1 TO MARCH 30
LBS.
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
4000 LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (1000 LBS./ACRE)
8 TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
400 BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 BALES/ACRE)
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 8
LBS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
----------------------
Owners name --:Danny Whaley County:Duplin
Mail Address-:Beul_aville, NE
Type of production unit ---- :Topping
Type of waste facility ----- :Anaerobi.c Lagoon
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a
given storage capacity. When the waste reaches the designed
level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients
in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste -utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce. the potential
for -pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report from your waste management facility.
The design of your waste management facility is based an the
following:
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year:
----------------------------------
3520 animals x 1.9 tons waste/animal/yr= 6688 tons
total waste

Page 2
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen Produced Per Year:
-----------------------------------------------------
3520 animals x 2.30 lbs. N/animal/year = 8096 lbs. /yr
Available N
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should
plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in
a timely manner. Your facility is designed for 180 days of -
storage. Therefore, it will need to be pumped every 6
months.
Tract
Field Soil
Crop
Yield
Lbs. N Acres
Lbs. N
Month to
No.
-----
No. Type
----- -----
Code
-----
-----
Per Ac.
----- -----
Used
-----
Apply
------
70870
1 NoA
6
7 Tons
400 10.0
4000
MAR-AUG
70870
1 NoA
2
100 Bu.
150 33.2
4980
MAR-JULY
Total 43.2
8980
Available
Nitrogen
8096
Surplus
Or Deficit
-884
Crop codes: 1=Cereal
grain;
2=Corn;
3=Fescue; 4=Range
Gr. Bermuda
S=Control
Grazed
Bermuda;
6=Hayland
Bermuda
Narrative of Operation:
Call the Soil and Water Conservation District Office after you
receive waste analysis report to obtain the amount per acre to
apply and the irrigation application rate prior to applying
waste.
Prepared by: 13 ii/ f u QsG-r
Name TitleM
Da4
Concurred in by:f 1 !2�Pr cer ate
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)

U. S. Department of'1,, culture
Soil Conservation Ser,,ce
NC-ENG-34
September 1980
File Code: 210
AA 6�► V
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR aWS-
Landowner ,Darr wA,, County
Community or Group No. M -b Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of dater to Top of Dam__L5._Ft. Length of Flood Pool as Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation-
Evaluation by,reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
.from sudden dam failure.
Est. Elev.:Est. Elevation
Kind of :Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length: Width: Slope: Land Use Improvements : Above :Floodwater Above
: flood Plain: Flood Plain
Ft: Ft. X Ft. Ft.
1
2
3 _
Describe potential for loss -of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach - All i
�» :/ f_. 091 _ / fr'J L. .�.- r.. •r _w _ __
G� Goes/
Hazard Classification of Dam (), b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21) _
Zau,�_--�
Dam Classification (I, II, III, IV, V)
By
name
tr e
Concurred -By A _(,
(name) -41 title
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date
Date k5�'i

SCS-ENG-538 U- S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRiCULTURE
P., 5-70 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
FARMER'S NAME J-)4NNLI CL DISTRICT
DATE -S -LDS - (-12- COUNTY
S. C. S. PHOTO SHEET NO. WORK UNIT
WATERSHED AREA MEASUREMENTS
CROPLAND —ACRES PASTURE —ACRES
WOODLAND —ACRES TOTAL —ACRES"
bI1x9)p1.Ri-1m
WORK uNrrCONSERVATIONIST
SKETCH OF PROPOSED'POND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS WERE MADE (Apprpx. scale 1"=—feet)
Local* referencff point " center line of darn and Identify an skm-k
■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■s■■■■■e■
■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■tee■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■
MENEM
MEMMENIES
1;:r'(Ne�aAe
•
and list dam-siteand stp�i,ll�,w�ay borf�BirsOfiRnt. Men poMnded arw anandDdambPa-snRit-oeO rfnq� - sevarate with 4mrrkal ned ftne
' tyw FpIiLt Ebgo
borin s.
Elmllull=�M�110 IMIM101010M 01 1010
Emwiri'vallamusygymy-dgm I

N'anurc from Pits PSWCD 1
LIVESTOCK WASTE SAMPLING, ANALYSIS, AND CALCULATION OF LAND APPLICATION RATES
I. SAMPLE COLLECTION
A. Liquid Manure Slurry
I. Under -slotted -floor pit
a. Use a length of 1/2" conduit open on one end and that can be
easily sealed on the other end (.e.g., by placing one's thumb
over the end of the conduit).
b. With both ends of the conduit open, extend it into the manure
to the pit floor.
c. Seal the upper end of the conduit trapping the manure that has
entered the lower end, remove and empty into a bucket or container.
c. Collect samples from at least 5 locations or at least enough
for a total of 1 quart of slurry.
e. Thoroughly mix this slurry and empty approximately 1/2 pint
into sample container.
2. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. Make sure the manure -has been well mixed or homogenized with a
liquid manure chopper -agitator pump or propeller agitator.
b. Take samples from approximately 5 locations in the pit, from the
agitator pump, or from the manure spreader and place.in a bucket.
c. Thoroughly mix and empty 1/2 pint into sample container.
II. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place the sample for analysis into a flexible or expandable container that
can be sealed. The container should be rinsed clean with water and free
of any residues but should not be chlorinated or treated in any other way.
Dry litter may also be placed in a sealed plastic bag such as a freezer bag.
B. The sample should be refrigerated, iced or cooled, if possible, or trans-
ferred to the lab immediately.
C. hand -delivery is the most reliable way of sample transfer, but it can also
be mailed-
D. If mailed, sample container should first be protected with a packing material
such as newspaper, then boxed or packaged with wrapping paper and taped.
E. The NCDA Plant Analysis Lab provides this service for a nominal fee of
$4 per sample which should be forwarded along with the sample.

PSWCD 1
1. Address: N. C. Department of Agriculture
Plant Analysis Lab
Agronomic Division
Blue Ridge Road Center
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. flay Campbell
F. Request that as a minimum the following analyses be performed:
1. Total nitrogen (TKN)
2. Ammonia nitrogen (NH N)
3. Total phosphorus (TP
4. Potassium . (K)
5. Dry litter samples should also include a total solids (TS) analysis.
G. Other analyses performed at no extra cost by NCDA include trace minerals.

PSWCD 2
I. SAMPLE COLLECTION
B. Lagoon Liquid
1. Collect approximately 1/2 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from the
inflow pipe to the flush tanks.
2. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on the end of a 10-15
foot long pole.
b. Extend the bottle 10-15 feet away from the bank edge.
c. Brush away any floating scum or debris so it is not collected
with sample.
d. Submerge the bottle within 1 foot of the liquid surface.
e. Repeat at approximately 5 locations around the Iagoon, place
into a bucket, thoroughly mix, and empty 1 pint into sample
container.
3. From a multi -stage lagoon system collect sample from lagoon that
is going to be irrigated from.
II. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place the sample for analysis into a flexible or expandable container that
can be sealed. The container should be rinsed clean with water and free
of any residues but should not be chlorinated or treated in any other way.
Dry litter may also be placed in a sealed plastic bag such as a freezer bag.
B. The sample should be refrigerated, iced or cooled, if possible, or trans-
ferred to the lab immediately.
C. hand -delivery is the most reliable way of sample transfer, but it can also
be mailed.
D. If mailed, sample container should first be protected with a packing material
such as newspaper,-theh boxed or packaged with wrapping paper and taped.
E. The NCDA Plant Analysis -Lab provides this service for a nominal fee of
$4 per sample which should be forwarded along with the sample.
1. Address: N. C. Department of Agriculture
Plant Analysis Lab
Agronomic Division
Blue Ridge Road Center
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
".ttn: Dr. Roy Campbell

PSWCD 2
F. Request that as a minimum the following analyses be performed:
1. Total nitrogen (TO)
2. Ammonia nitrogen Mi
N)
3. Total phosphorus
4. Potassium (K)
5. Dry litter samples should also include a total solids (TS) analysis.
G. Other analyses performed at no extra cost by NCDA include trace minerals.

.rja.. H�n.Jn-
'�'yz`,,42
7
d-iSo4(�
a t'`� is -'L'' � q � �ti �� '��'��: =..�" �-t;•,yr•ft
�-f�-
_.�#L
�s#a },f h� - .� X • _� :, �s ^d �* ax'E -4 � �. .r{r y'-y��xx(��'�`�3 Ylss �:: �.
4
j
�`'• .{�`a far: }'�� Y'r�. �- '@`� ��4�� � 1 'w"i1� � it N d ,C+:] _
[ .�y' Rr .I r '� " SYt• M' "�'�; t. e�i�"^+°"4 ti ?; II��_�'� k- .s4'�,y �e `t. }� r� �,.
�[� �"�' ;~t •:7 �� x�Lt � r � � .� ti.l� �';1�w Ov'Yv4
e f'�
'ram l' � � 1'.'Y r/�d•�. .
a
t�

. . . . . . . . . . . .
fie,!
ltl+yoos
11-n a. L W 7 n owty l
-MTV
.1 6 NOW
his I
1—!VL,T,5N aASRI Qljll N r,% 7
L 041
- 0, to
1
60
lit
any I•",.k ��Ntj
ij• 4,
•00 1
f ;-."Z: ?y, zj ..",li L, 6, 'k
fj!. "'.5 0
kI'7�:',
r'4
• �..i •,,,r{,r/�. �` ` r J'� .ir'r_r .. . t` %r4rr r�,(„ x -r':, r'h .S'F N• 1'!tr,i �,')'4,�xrt, �. f f�� '�,7,.�� �_t , arl� �•�y
s W
.21
k9
oom K
fA
-4t
A A
.s:,� _ 6 � ,� \�:•f, �' twr._ {Y �� t �,+ ti. -!�•, r. r h: r � rr- r u ��q• j.
I oo.r
4
Vd
t Z.1
py — 0•',
gg............
Y— KIN-
" f .
7!�7-
too

L
L:
LI
+1
INN\'
'.7,
vy,
.Z7
16.
7�7
0
TAR
-tog
got,
=;t
ws
n 4;
14
:3
sn�
LO
LO

- 4 r,' 'y •r
.4 n. k.•t t:
lrti .. � 1 ••T ':.•�:
z.?i.yl1 5i
MAT 1
::r•
t 5 if,+1
L •f.
Jt
t L ♦Iti� �•• /
1
•', i'• 1. '4
' �--'�, .� '1 • � '•"•L 1, ri;:
. — ., ors' ,`: :�:•:
-
i it ri':•'•
r♦
oil
•s .: Y
P
•:{ ..rr:: d-_ - '•:ter :�::::: r: h• ::�
',:l ,err a E ! 'r •h
l ''L !rr + rr •:
1. rl
Y, rr•.
•� r•y
f \'
. � �=tY f � f _• 'ik-i. �e�•yt g''s! Jail r-5 , T y.F '.,'' '[ • x �,.• '., ;:: s' . •_ � ,
�-^�,,• � ,- �,1.;-' �^y,>Yyw� ..'L Y Y ,! '� ,A J r 1, 5 � .. 1.\ '
Moo,
R'i �'••:1. > :5 14"�...Ery•a � f.�� x•y >, ) �� \ �- r� � Y' �� � �. 'i'
i 'rilt:�k r,`•�t';4 •rY•t„4ya .a. sl :,�;, �•r �� r ':fit, ! _ 1/ 1
�<'s����� � �sL , n'�4 t a rnt , T ,� war 1 •r , .� s t _ !j - 1 1 ,
.��4et y�} ,r. al[ �w :y Sk YZ �� .ramy•�, � -E- \ h l � !x:r r - FI- 4� •y j.
r rSklie c`4 \C.� _77:,—
loss �tl -�R rk'r y i �`f i.+, i�t+`. •'1 l'i- '!� '.`� /J
C � i-,• a t�f� .,t;Yr „�, t< � fr.
+,�s __••-•1 5 '17 `r wp r54�'S F. �t. ' �_ * T �1, ;�i w4�i� •tj4 L � � �.;.p)} .,i '�) „ fl - ..
ti ,: � ,'�; ar• it h r t � r ` ' fl "'N*, j;b`YL \ t�'r r �.r�, f �f ' 1_ � �t
. .+� r ; �« f•. , ft , i •. r y '1 �:��•�t \ 7_it : a ltrl 'kr ,cic y�j � ... • • � 4 '' 1, y���''S{y ::i:
f..r �,".�a.+ f � �� .�ffi :xs � 4X �.t "!'fiP � rF-� 1 - �•�� � .. - � I�yt e,.r „
- ••.x' // r .
,r-"""".`--,•- .. s' ,
`�,'� 5 1 .�li• :� � ill• : , �1 `fi ' �

U.S. Department of Agriculture Page 1 of 3
Soil Conservation Service June 15, 1992
7
RECORD OF DECISIONS AND APPLICATION
Assisted By Billy Houston / Ross Nichols
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field Planned Applied
No. Amount --Date Amount I Date Narrative Record
Tract Number 70870
Conservation System ID: 1
lb
lb
10 Ac.
10 Ac.
lb I 10 Ac.
Mar 93
Jun 92
Mar 93
Pasture
510 - Pasture and Hayland
Management
Mow hayland at proper cutting
height and time for the hay
species. Maintain hayland in
good cover with seed mixture
which suits drainage
limitations of the soil. Lime
and fertilize by soil test.
512 - Pasture and Hayland
Planting
Disk and prepare firm seed bed,
lime and fertilize according to
a soil test and sprig with
coastal bermuda at the rate of
10 to 12 bushels per acre if
set in rows or 25 bushels per
acre if broadcast.
633 - Waste Utilization
Utilize swine waste by pumping
lagoon effluent on cropland or
grassland. Waste should be
analyzed for nutient content
and fields should be soil
tested. Waste should be
applied at a rate determined by
the waste analysis and the soil
test. Do not exceed'200 pounds
of nitrogen per acre for corn
or fescue and 400 pounds per
acre on coastal bermudagrass.

U.S. Department.of Agriculture Page 2 of 3
Soil Conservation Service June 15, 1992
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RECORD OF DECISIONS AND APPLICATION
Assisted By Billy Houston / Ross Nichols
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field Planned Applied
--No-
Amount-- -Date--I Amount I -Date- '--r-Narrative-Record----y-----
Conservation System ID: 2
lc 30.2 Ac. Apr 93
lc 30.2 Ac. Mar 93
lc 1 30.2 Ac.
Mar 93
Cropland
328 - Conservation Cropping
Sequence
Establish a conservation
cropping system of continuous
corn.
344 - Crop Residue Use
After harvesting corn or
soybeans shred or disk stalks
lightly and allow the residue
to remain on the land for at
least four months. If
preferred, seed small grain at
the rate of 2 bu. per acre.
Allow the cover crop to remain
on the land for at least four
months.
633 - Waste Utilization
Utilize swine waste by pumping
lagoon effluent on cropland or
grassland. Waste should be
analyzed for nutient-content
and fields should be soil
tested. Waste should be
applied at a rate determined by
the waste analysis and the soil
test. Do not exceed 200 pounds
of nitrogen per acre for corn
or fescue and 400 pounds per
acre on coastal bermudagrass.

U.S. Department of Agriculture Page 3 of 3
Soil Conservation Service June 15, 1992
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RECORD OF DECISIONS AND APPLICATION
Assisted By Billy Houston / Ross Nichols
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field Planned Applied
No. Amount Date Amount Date Narrative Record
Conservation System ID: 3_ Other Land
la
la
la
7 Ac.
Jul ' 92
1
No.
Jun
92
470
Ft.
Jul
92
342 - Critical Area Planting
On the steep eroding area noted
on the conservation plan map
establish a perennial grass,
legume, or legume -grass
mixture. See the enclosed
Information Sheet, CRITICAL.
AREA PLANTING, NC--190-111, for
establishment and maintenance
details.
359 - Waste Treatment Lagoon
Construct animal waste dispoal
lagoon. The lagoon will be
constructed according to SCS
standards and specifications.
362 - Diversion
Construct and maintain a
diversion to safely intercept
and convey water off the field.
Construct according to SCS
standards and specifications at
location(s) shown on the
conservation plan map.

P19. U
READY'
N.
P
Cli R
FL• Danriy
Wa-r;.:tl. G y
Date: ----------------- ------ -- __ _--------=7 kt � I�c�4i 9
Dist- to nearest resiC)2n e toi, -Eer- than GL•irer'll .
�!
5 C.vi.3 ( i clY'r0vi to f i'ri i sih 1 _=_---_______•_ __-�====t
r
54W5 .Var-'o4J to
head itlr;ISrt2rrC] Cl7t1i % .--- -_ -_-'---------=--=)
L� _CL�
16 Pr iiul
�'•
5i.wS (-F--a''-r-0UJ 't0 VJ@ccri) ____=____=__-____==__-='-i
}iLl--P
s..;=gad (;,jean to feeder-)
Lt0
S 0—:-'age `.'01LLine t=r' 11.LJ e ZtC i fll. +_I.i. r'. ) >
Oc'c'] r.'L.AY-i
11
1riSlrje -_0D 1eTi11th-__=____===_=-_-_--_____-____}
37'3.5
Fti.i-c
inside- top
0
V«D Qf dike at
54.2
iC=t CLE.6LIR
i 0
ALT-i_
irj
B ttCm Gf 1,-ii"=Cror, e I ev =01. iCrri.-.__ W. _._____=7
i-.0
SPwl..S
�L
. rot&.1 re=lt_li'r ed
i
?0ta I Cjc_-ign VC,1urie ctV�i1. ,-=_____-=i Si15C,
�0
Design end p _iilip i n g e 1 e,;.
0 4 : 1-fi r`i`i
�h�

Ch
Cern
l 1l l Cem _
24
274
J \ CemS SM 27.4 •$�'®ate$ �\ �♦
55
Hadley- '—�-
k cn • eM26.9
—
..L•_ Tom.:% '.:/•.• •/ ._�~.-� �-t 4
L7i5
Ic
$3 V �y�•
- • '+e.w v9 �' - .-• - � 'ice _ x '- 3r. .'.
420 000.•r
1
♦F .ram _ x'.'•++fCrt .v
ET t +taee�4((11SSjj��y
AL
3154
FE
- •� � -- ��- � •=� ''moo � : -�.� - . r �_ '�� � ��
r ~.s :,4:,.� .,, :•gam;'� 180: ,�_`.�J 27_S "
'•i:`.;i� 3 H±r. ram, r.. (I.a. �� ' :.3y; "� t �-
•.s J Ctrs .-. 't1' ��14r'•+hdCtc+ :l is-'.i;. :•�-,i f ; -"ram. r 1
34'52'30"+_ = : - r `" _ u►���` -r.. r .i��
7745' r49 SO 2 380 000 FEET ar rk
r51
Mapped, edited, and published
P by the Geological Surrey '1
Control by Geodetic USGS,.NOSTNOAA, and North Carolina Geod i $ c Burley * =
Topography by photogramrnetric methods from aerial photographs { fatten 1977. U"
Field checked i979. Map edited 1980 ia0
cn
Projection and 10,000;oot grid ticks; North Carolina Coordinate

�tJ�.
X
w
z
O

SCS-CnG-53£ U. S. DEPnR, WENT OF AGP•ICULTURE
V.". --;a
- LC•il. C6tvSEF1,•,;TIOr4 SEr.:'IC[i
SOIL INVES iGATION TO DETEP;�4IN= SUITABILITY OF PROPOSE© POND SITE
v FAF.ISER`S NAZI E rsx �lh�! ii", DISTRICT
DATE , S Z�—� ? -- -� COUNTY— 0t�J1
S. C. S. PHOTO SHEET NO. WORK UNIT_�i—
WAT£RSHEIf AREA MEASUR£M£N'iS
CROPLAND ACRES PASTURE ACRES
WOODLAND ACRES TOTAL ACRES -POND CLASS WORK -UNIT CONSERVATIONIST
SKETCH OF PROPOSED•POND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS WERE MADE. (Approz.-scale 1't= feet) � - -
Locale rdcnrnce point Tn ccnl"t lme_of dam and Ldc fly oa sk�iA:_-
I 1 I 1 1 1 r .1 I I' . 1 I., 1 7 I 1 1 . 1 1' I I I. . 1- -1 1 1 I 1 1
SHOW BORING NUMBER AND PROFILE
L'EPTIi HaAC and list ecrn-s a and svlll�g borines first- thm ponded airm and born w pit borings-sep.erote with vertical r.wd line.
(Conlinure on GaeA wAc nccej arVj Shwa wafer table afeualions on dam -site boring$.
IM
mom
EL
Now
L0ItlNGS MADE BY r3---i-b,f SIGNATURE & TTTiE dAYSA"C ��

ONOUnited States Soil P. O. Box 277
Department of Conservation Kenansville, NC 28349
Agriculture Service Telephone [phone]
WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY SITE EVALUATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
NAME Wha 14, if LOCATION r, ' '�f O ( C y
, ems a✓a ,;I/ _, Nc ippF
TELEPHONE C1 ► 0 -- , qF- 142S-9 SIZE OF OPERATION t5�2 80 F od,.,
LOCATION DATA
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER 14004- "led)
NUMBER OF HOUSES WITHIN 2000 FEET OF SITE "to
IS SITE WITHIN 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? YES NO ✓
IS SITE AT LEAST 100 FEET FROM A "BLUE LINE' PERENNIAL STREAM? YES ✓ NO
IS SITE WITHIN 1 MILE ZONING JURISDICTION OF A MUNICIPALITY? YES NO .:
if yes, landowner should consult with local zoning board about required permits
WETLANDS
WILL SITE INVOLVE CLEARING WOODLAND. OR ANY NON CROPLAND ? YES NO ✓
IF YES, HAS PRODUCER COMPLETED AN AD-1026 FORM? YES NO
DOES NON WETLAND NEED TO BE MEASURED BY REGISTERED SURVEYOR PRIOR TO
APPROVING WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN YES NO
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PRODUCER TO CONTACT THE US
ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND THE NC DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TO
DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL PERMITS ARE REQUIRED. NO WETLANDS SHOULD BE ALTERED UNTIL
PRODUCER RECEIVES WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM SCS, US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND NC
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
WASTE MANAGEMENT - VALID ONLY IF WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN ATTACHED
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY LAND APPLY WASTE? YES ✓ NO
IF NO, DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE LAND? YES NO
SEEATTACHED PLAIN FOR SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS
SOU, INVESTIGATION - VALID ONLY IF SOIL INVESTIGATION SHEET ATTACHED
IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR LAGOON?
IS A CLAY LINER REQUIRED?
IF YES, IS CLAY AVAILABLE ONsao.
IS A CORE TRENCH REQUIRED?
YES ✓ NO
YES No
YES NO QUESTIONABLE
YES ✓ NO
SITE APPROVED YES ✓ NO CONDITIONAL
COMMENTS
APPROVAL BASED ON SCS STANDARDS VALID FOR 60 DAYS FROM DATE SIGNED_ THIS APPROVAL
SURJEU. TO CHANGE BASSET) ON CHANGES IN NATIONAL, STATE, W' -OC:t_. CAN.
Tt+e ery
1;4G hta [�S7'SB ,.750 FEF,'I' FROM RESIDENCE AT TIME OF DESIGN.
son arv+Ge
is an agency of the r
DeoarUnent of 1lgricutture SIGNATURE 13'0-v n. [f rr DATE - 1

US Department of Agriculture NC --CPA 16 4
Soil Conservation Service 4-92
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Land User/Owner OC96POI V wha 1 Eu County a -en 1 1-,7 _
Location/Tract & Field Number T iQ??O , 7C-0 ,3 Acreage �, Z
Prepared by 13O'cr Date 19''-2S -
BriefDescriptionof Planned Practice/RMS///Project Measure;
�L a aow Jr' a Ajf�re A f '
Environmental Factors and Resources to Identify and Evaluate J
1. Is wetland included in the planning area: (References: NCPM;
190-GM 410.26; Hydric soils list; Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the U.S._; National Wetlands Inventory Maps;
NFSAM.
No
Yes - If yes,
-- Identify types present
--- Attach environmental evaluation
showing what
effect
planned assistance will have on
wetland and
how this
assistance is within policy
-- Have needed permits (CANA, DEM,
Corps, etc.)
been
obtained by the landuser?
--- Make sure no planned practices
will put the
landowner in
violation of Swampbuster
Endangered and/or threatened species:
(References:
190-GM
410.22; Technical Guide Section I-i(13)
and Section
I-vii
} ' =
No Yes
Identify species whose range and habitat needs indicate
" they might occur in planning area
-- Identify on map any designated critical habitat

f
Is a designated natural or scenic area included in the planning
area or will planned actions impact on an adjacent natural or
scenic area? (References: 190-GM 410.23 and .24)
L--' No
Yes. If yes, encourage landuser to consult with concerned
agencies:,. societies, and individuals to arrive at
mutually: satis:factory land use, and treatment.
Does.
the- planning: area include: the. 10.0-year, - flood- plain?.
(ReferenQes-_­ NCpX.,-j- 4110,.2-5.,,*.- HUD; Flood P-1-aln. maps);
No
Yes -- If yes:,
Is- them asslsto_& a_ctldn, likely to. have, significant
adverseeffects. on. existing-. natural and beneficial
values-. in, the. flood, pla-in?,
Is- there.. a. practical, al-ternative, outside. the. flood-
plain? -
Has. the flood. p.1-Ain- been, used for agricultural
product -ion.. for at least. 3- of_ the- last 5. years?
Is an, archaeological: or- historical site. located: in- the: planning.
area? (Re.,ferences:. NCPMj. 420-GM National. Register, of
Historic Places)=
L,--'— Ro-
Yes: — If-, yes,_. have, steps, been, taken, to ensure. the
protection:of this area'..',
6.. Are. there any prime-,, unique,. or locally important farmlands: in
the operating. unit'?' (,References: 3-1.0!--GM).-
No
Yes - If yes-, identify- on: a soils map- or- legend. IV04, RO-4
W3"-1'1- the- action- result- in- sodbustinq.?-
No. Yes
w3_11'tl�e action- result in. swamp busti'ng?
. gf..
Yes_ -
10'there. a. potential for- controversy.?
No. ✓ Yest
From whom-..,. lqdjc;

=0. Are permits required?/Should the person contact permit agencies?
No ✓ yes
When an environmental factor or resource is identified on the
site, the user will refer to the appropriate reference for policy
and document the appropriate action in the notes portion of this
form.
NOTES, DOCUMENTATION, FOLLOW-UP
OG �1jra'tla�+
k

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
FOR
Danny Whaley
Beulaville NC 28518
August 25, 1993
Your animal waste ation plan has been specifically
developed for yo r 5280 SEDER TO FINISH _._SWINE operation.
The plan is base soil types, crops to be grown, and
method of application -for your particular -operation. The waste
must be land applied at a specified -rate to prevent pollution
of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the
animal waste should be used to reduce the amount_ of commercial
fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as
the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each
application-and.annual soil tests are encouraged so that all
plant nutrients and lime can be balanced for realistic yield
of the crops, to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value ,.
of the waste and to ensure.that}it is applied in an environ-
mentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs
of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste.
The amount of available nitrogen for plant use is dependant on
the method of application, Soil type is important due to
different leaching potential'and yield potential_ Waste shall
not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per .acre
per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land
when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may
result in runoff to surface waters. Wind conditions should
also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems.
To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and
reduce the potential for pollution, waste should be applied to
a growing crop or not more than 30 days prior to planting.
Soil incorporation of - the waste will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply 'the animal waste are based on
,} -typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Annual
acreage requireme its may _.be more or less depending on the
°,. specific waste analysis report for your facility at the time
f of * irrigation.
t

Your waste utilization plan is based on the following:
TABLE A. AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I NUMBER OF I [TONS WASTE PER ! TONS WASTE I
I ANIMALS I TYPE OF -ANIMALS 1 1000 ANIMALS I PER YEAR !
I----------- I ------------------------------ I --------------- I------------1
1 5280 1 FEEDER TO FINISH 1 1900 1 10032 !
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
'ABLE B.
SUMMARY
OF CROPS
BY FIELD
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRACT
I FIELD
I SOIL
I
I ACRES I CROP ICROPCODEI
I I ------------------------------- I --------
---------
70870
1-------
11
-------
1 NoA
------- 1
120.7 1 HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS HAY 1 BH I
70870
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 2
1 NoA
120.3 1 HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS HAY I BH I
CABLE C. SUMMARY OF CROPS, YIELD, AND NUTRIENT REQUIREMENTS BY SOIL TYPE
I CROP I SOILI YIELDI UNITS I TOTAL NI *TOTAL P I *TOTAL'K I
I----------------------------l----}------i-----I -- I_------_--- i----------I
I HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS HAY [NoA 16.0 ITONS 1300 10 1140 - 160 1
------------------------ ------------- 7---------------------------------------
.► Total phosphate and potash amounts should be confirmed with a soil test.
TABLE D. WASTE MANAGEMENT BY FIELD
l I I CROPIWASTE AP-PLI TYPE
]WASTE N I
COMM NI
MONTHS TO APPLY I
I TRACT IFIELDI CODE] METHOD I WASTE
1-----1----- I ---------- I -------
1 LB/AC I
I -------- I
LB/AC I
I
ANIMAL WASTE I
------------------- 1
I-------
170870 1 1 1 BH ]IRRIGATE ISWINE
1 300
-------
1 0 1
APRIL TO OCT 1
170870 1 2 1 BH [IRRIGATE ISWINE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 300
1 0 1
APRIL TO OCT I

he acres, crops, and application method shown in the preceding tables w_1i
_ccommodate approximately 5347.8 animals of the type shown in Table A.
.f more commercial fertilizer is used than is shown in Table D, then
additional acres of land will be needed. A 3 - 15 feet wide permanent
;rass filter strip should be seeded along all ditches in fields that
-eceive animal waste.
;DDITIONAL COMMENTS
Prepared by:
Concurred in
If
Title f)-Y c. 1
by: Date
Produc r
I

PSWCD i
._,/^.. !!.��.. .._'.r �:\D �. 1. L�:..li ._l1. r.i
S,,.PLE LOLLEC IVI`t "
A. Liquid Manure Slurry
1. lender -slotted -floor pit
a, Use a length of 1/2" conduit open on one end and that can be
easily sealed on the other end (e.g., by placing one's thumb
over the end of the conduit).
b. .With both ends of the conduit open, extend it into the manure
to the pit floor.
c. Seal the upper end of the conduit trapping the manure that has
entered the lower end, remove and empty into a bucket or container.
C. Collect samples from at least, 5 locations or at least enough
for a total of 1 quart of slurry.
e. Thoro_ughiy mix this slurry and empty approximately 1/2 pint
into sample container.
2. Exterior storage basin or tank _
a. Make sure the manure has been well mixed or homogenized with a
liquid manure chopper -agitator pump or propeller agitator.
b. Take samples from approximately 5 locations in the pit, from the
agitator pump, or from the,qianure spreader and place.in a bucket.
c.: Thoroughly mix and empty 1%2'pint into sample container.
II. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place the sample .for analysis into a flexible or expandable container that
can be sealed. The container should be rinsed clean with water and free
of any residues but should not be chlorinated or treated in any other way.
Dry litter may also be placed in a sealed plastic bag such as a freezer bag.
B. The sample should be refrigerated, iced or cooled, if possible, or trans-
ferred to the lab immediately.
C. Hand delivery is the most reliable way of sample transfer, but it can also
be mailed.
D. If mailed,. sample container should first be protected with a packing material
such as newspaper, then boxed or packaged with wrapping paper and -taped.
E. The NCDA Plant Analysis Lab provides this service for a nominal fee of
$4 per sample which should be forwarded along with the sample.

PSWCD- 1
1 . Address: C. Departi ens c Aer icu'� cur
Plant Analysis Lab
Agronomic Division
Slue Ridge Road Center
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
F. Request that as a minimum the following analyses be performed:
1. Total nitrogen (TKN)
2. Ammonia nitrogen (DER K)
'3. Total phosphorus (iP
4. Potassium . (K)
5. pry litter samples should also include a total solids (YS) analysis.
G_ Other analyses performed at no extra cost by NCDA include trace minerals.
c
i

PSWCG 2
5. Lagoon Liquid r`
i. Collect approximately 1/2 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from the
inflow pipe to the flush tanks.
2. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on the end of a 1.0-15
foot long pole.
b. Extend the bottle 10-15 feet away from the bank edge.
c. Brush awAy any floating scum or debris so it is not collected
with sample.
d. Subinnerge the bottle within 1 foot of the liquid surface'.
e. Repeat at approximately 5 locations around the lagoon, place
into a bucket, thoroughly mix, and empty 1 pint into sample
container.
3. From a multi -stage lagoon system collect sample from lagoon that
is going to be irrigated from. ,
II. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place the sample for analysis into a flexible or expandable container that ,
can be sealed. The container should be rinsed clean with water and free
of any residues but. should not be chlorinated or treated -in any other way.- St
Dry litter may also be placed in A:,s.ealed plastic bag such as a freezer bag.
B. The sample should be refrigerated, iced or cooled, if possible, or trans-
ferred to the lab immediately.
C. Hand -delivery is the most reliable way of sample transfer, but it can also
be mailed.
D; 'If mailed, sample container should first be protected with a packing material
such as newspaper, then boxed or packaged with wrapping paper and taped.
E. The NCDA Plant Analysis -Lab provides this service for a -nominal fee of
$:4 per sample which should be forwarded -along with the sample.
I. .Address: N. C. Department of Agriculture
Plant Analysis Lab
Agronomic Division
Blue Ridge Road Center
Raleigh, NC 27611
[phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
MIK

PSfNCD 2
o v S C: S be P e
1. Total nitrogen (T Kii
2- Ammonia nitrogen NHiN)
I
Total phosphorus
4. Potassium (K)
5- Dry litter samples should also include a total solids (TS) analysis.
G. Other analyses performed at no extra cost by NCDA include trace minerals.

C
LAGOON DESIGN CHECK LIST
Copy of 026 and supporting maps included if clearing involved.
(including access roads and waste application system sites)
.2._rDam Safety Exclusion
a. Dike not over L5 feet high to down stream slope and not over
10 acre,feet storage to top of dike.
3. Storage Volumes
adesigned volume exceeds needs
`.b.--all temporary storage is designed above the seasonable high
water table.
.-c.-^" minimum of 6 feet treatment volume depth available
d.. no sludge storage statement included if landowner so requests
4. Operation & Maintenance Plan (sheet included)
a. begin and end pump -out elevations shown
5. Location Sketch (included)
a. distance and direction to nearest residence shown
b. road numbers shown
C. north arrow.shown
6..... Hazard Classification Sheet (NC-ENG-34 included)
u a.. •.distance Ito nearest stt'eam in event of dike failure shown
b." distance to nearest public road in event of failure shown
C. topo map of'area to support a & b above included .
7. Waste Utilization Plan (included)
a. all tracts, field numbers, field acreage, (available acres
excluding buffers for ditches, roads, homes, property line,
etc.) crops shown
b. signatures of producer & person preparing -plan
C. pumping agreement signed by adjoining landowner showing tract
numbers, field numbers, acres, etc. if needed
d. legible ASCS maps of effluent disposal fields included
e. legible soil survey sheets showing all effluent disposal
fields included
f. suitability of soils for crops planned assured
g. attachment'"B" on sampling procedure included
Soil Investigation Sheet (SCS-ENG-538 included)
~-G. r,.inimum of three borings on Class IV & V- lagoons _
_ b. borings 2.0' below des igned bottom of lagoon
___c.---location & elevation of borings in relation to grid survey
seasonal high water table at highest elevation
e: borrow area location shown

Operator:DANNY
WHALEY County:
DUPLIN
Date:
10/21/93
Distance
to nearest
residence (other
than
owner):
1400.0
feet
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
0
sows
(farrow to finish)
x
1417
lbs. =
0
lbs
0
sows
(farrow to feeder)
x
522
lbs. -
0
lbs
1760
head
(finishing only)
x
135
lbs. -
237600
lbs
0
sows
(farrow to wean)
x
433
lbs. =
0
lbs
0-head
(wean to feeder)
x
30
lbs. =
0
lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = 237600 lbs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 237600 lbs. SSLW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW= 1 CF/lb. SSLW
Volume = 237600 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
4. TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME
Inside top length 290.0 feet ; Inside top width 190.0 feet
Top of dike at elevation 49.3 feet -
Freeboard 1.0 feet ; Side slopes 3.0 : 1 (Inside lagoon)
Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation 48.3 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation 39.3 feet
Seasonal high water table elevation 43.1 feet
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDEI SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 284.0 184.0 9.00
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
284.0 184.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
230.0 130.0
52256 (AREA OF TOP)
29900 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
257.0 157.0 161396 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = AAREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOMD * DEPTH/6
52256.0 161396.0 29900.0 1.5
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT TOTAL DESIGN LIQUID LEVEL = 365328 CU. FT.

1A
f
5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
290.0 190.0 55100.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
Length * Width =
0.0 0.0 0.0 square feet
-TOTAL DA 55100.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Approximate daily production of manure in CF/LB SSLW 0.00136
Volume = 237600 Lbs. SSLW * CF of Waste/Lb./Day * 180 days
Volume = 58164 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or, volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallons
per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall - 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
-Volume = 32141.7 cubic feet

5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.5 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 34437.5 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 58164 cubic feet
5B. 0 cubic feet
5C. 32142 cubic feet
5D. 34438 cubic feet
TOTAL 124744 cubic feet
Jvly 4_-1 4
Total required volume 362344 cubic feet
Total design volume avail. 365328 cubic feet
Min. req. treatment volume plus sludge accumulation 237600 cubic fe
At elev. 45.7 feet ; Volume is 237839 cubic feet (end pumping)
Total design volume less 25yr-24hr storm is 330891 cubic feet
At elev. 47.6 feet ; Volume is 326921 cubic feet (start pumping)
Seasonal high water t ble elevation 43.1 feet
7. DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY:��
DATE: ((u ZZ— DATE:
SCS DOES NOT CERTIFY
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN THAT EXCAVATION AND
FILL VOLUMES ARE
COMMENTS: CORRECT

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
------------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) with
min. odor control. The time required for the planned fluid level to be
reached (permanent + temporary storage) may vary due to soil conditions
flushing operations, and the amount of fresh water added to the system.
The designed 6 months temporary storage is an estimated volume
based on: 1) waste from animals; 2) excess rainfall after evaporation;
and 3) the largest 24 hour (one day) rainfall that occurs on the
average of once every 25 years. The volume of waste generated from
a given number of animals will be fairly constant throughout the year
and from year to year. This estimate is based on 7 inches of excess
rainfall which is equal to or exceeds the highest 6 months excess in
a year. The average annual excess rainfall is approximately 8 inches.
Therefore, an average of 8 inches of excess rainfall will need to be
pumped each year. The 25 year rainfall will not be a factor to consider
in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage volume must always be
available. A -maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). If -the outlet pipe is not installed on the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent marker must be installed on this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain minimum treatment depth (6 feet).
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. care should be.
taken when applying waste to prevent damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at -all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before.land application.
3. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches eleva-
tion 47.6 as marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -out when
the fluid level reaches elevation 45.7 or before the fluid depth is
less than 6 feet deep (this prevents the loss of favorable
bacteria). The design temporary storage, less 25 year storm
is 90306 cubic feet or 675490 gallons. As stated before, this
volume will vary considerably from year to year.

t
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is'
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3
inch per hour.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. Keep a minimum of 25-feet of grass vegetated buffer around
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not pump within 200 feet of a
residence or within 100 feet of a well.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

r
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION.OF'WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS•
Clearing:
All trees and brush shall be removed from the construction area
before any excavating or fill is started. Stumps will be removed
within the area of the foundation of the embankment and fill areas
and all excavated areas. All stumps and roots exceeding one (1)
inch in diameter shall be removed to a minimum depth of one (1)
foot. Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The
foundation area shall be loosened thoroughly before placement of
embankment material. Lagoon site (and pad site if needed) to be
stripped of topsoil (311) and stockpiled for use on dike and pad
slopes (2-311). The topsoiling quantity is in excess of amounts
specified on page one (1) .
Cut-off Trench:
---------------
A cut-off trench (when specified) shall be installed as shown in
the plans.
Construction:
Construction of excavated and earthfili areas shall be performed to
the neat lines -and grades as planned. Deviations from this will
require prior approval of the SCS. Earthfill shall be placed in
max. of 611.1ifts and not placed in standing water. Compaction shall be
performed by the construction equipment or cheeps -foot roller during
placement. The embankment of the lagoon shall be installed using
the more impervious materials. Construction of fill heights shall
include ten (10) percent for settlement.' To protect against seepage,
when areas of unsuitable material are encountered, they will need to
be excavated a minimum of one (1) foot below grade and backfilled and
compacted with a SCS approved material (ie-CL,SC,CH). Refer to the soil
investigation information in the plans for special considerations.
Precautions should be taken during construction to prevent excessive
erosion and sedimentation.
Vegetation:
All exposed embankment and other bare constructed areas shall be
seeded to the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after
construction according to seeding specifications sheet.

SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS
-----------------------
AREA TO BE SEEDED: 2.0 ACRES
USE THE SEED MIXTURE INDICATED:
0 LBS. FESCUE GRASS § 60 LBS./ACRE
(BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER 15 TO NOVEMBER 30
0 LBS. 'PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS § 60 LBS./ACRE
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1)
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO JUNE 30
16 LBS. HULLED BERMUDA GRASS § 8 LBS./AC.
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO JULY 31
0 LBS. RYE GRAIN § 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
--0 LBS. RYE GRASS § 40 LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMBER 1 TO MARCH 30
LBS.
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
2000 LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (1000 LBS./ACRE)
4 TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
200 BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 BALES/ACRE)
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1.. PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS. IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 8
LBS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.

Orientation: -45.0 Z Magnification: 80.9 Inclination: 20.0
i•
47.0 _.
46.6
46.0
45.5
45. 0
44.5
Lower Left 30 Mesh Surface
3D Mesh Surface
Existing
Project: DANNY WHALEY
Drawing: 5HTL
Number:
Location:
Bid Data:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared bW: using Sitework

DaWlight Pecimater 46.60
V46.60 )K46.30 )K45.31
47.20 )K 46. 90 # 46. 0
48.10 )K 46. 80 W46.20
4
)K 46. 40 )K 46. 70
46.T0
6.30
"1 45.60 46.30
46.60 X 46.20
46.80 X 46.80
47.4e
Plot of all data for the surface:
Existing
Project: DANNY WHALEY
Drawing: SHT1
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: using Sitework

. .
jncLimstLan'
14mon.f -icationi 19'2
z
'tation% -46-6
48. 0
42.9
Lower L"ft W
a 0$4t4
WRY
SHI
pro SHTI
Of-OWIT)w
Location!
aid Oats:
enl2ing",
-,ti,mtor.
PrOPOr'sd b%J
Waing $it*,600rk
30 mooh sorroce

n? tcWL CkOS5 ssc-riog VM-W Dr A DNP:• •.n'mGq=- LA&OON
p I-T RC-
ao`tTOM
0 F S V IMF
--
�9�i
-ToY fkL DE51a4
6 LbG,
gT�Q.WGE �l.�V�
A wrr L 6 b
, IL,
TOP oP: AIkE
f=+il��Fl�b FiDOk PEW,
8v
31D I
to ve k-r
DP n ul ltT
�47.7.�2
alc v.
Su�pOR'� Q E- �l Q cS6
``1'�'��r;rra,�,r;,i•r �:,; � i 1 .. ! � r !�' ��-, rL'Muv��
. � � .rjtpe_ c�,1 1,�•��vi7.ti C� �ly'4 V �f I/I �ir ��f..l��d� W,lrit

Fill shrink/swell percent: 20.00 Cut shrink/swell percent: 0.00
Iterating to balancing within 10.0 cubic yards...
delta Cut Fill
0.00 7463.24 11109.24
-0.84 8924.63 8450.75
-0.74 8750.76 8749.59
-0.74 8750.32 8750.33
Lower "Proposed" by 0.74 feet.
New surface called "Balanced" has been created.
Project: DANNY WHALEY
Drawing: SHT1
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
-Prepared by: using Sitework
CUT - FILL
-3646.00
473.89
1.17
-0.00

Daylight
ElNZI_I
96
4848 @.49
voavOka i
:149. as
46.66
Plat of all data for the surface:
Balancer!
Project: DANNY WHALEY
Drawing: 5H71
Number:
Location!
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: using Sitswork

Daylight
Plot of the contour data for the surface:
Balanced
Project: DANNY WHALEY
Drawing: SHTI
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared bW: using Sitawcrk

Daylight
Plot of th■ sloping lines for the surface;
Balanced
Project: DANNY WHALEY
Drawing: SHT1
Number:
Location:
Bid Data:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared but using Sitawork

49.26
49:4
Plot of the sloping lines for the surface:
Balanced
Project: DANNY WHALEY
Drawing: SHT1
Number:
Location:
Bid Onto:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared bW: using Sitawork

1 49.43
49.43
49. 9B
Plot of th■ sloping lines for the surface:
Balanced
Project: DANNY WHALEY
Drawing: SHTI
Number:
Location:
Bid Data:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared bW: using Sitswork

DoWlight
OANNY WHALEY: SHT1: emlancwd 21 OCT 93 10:67 AM

52.00
48.00
48.00
44.00
42.00
40.00
38. 08 '
Proposed
-ILLY ------------------ *"*"*"* ............. * ................ * .............. ... ......... .............................................................. .................. .... ................. ........ ..........
---------------------------------------------------- Ex ijiLting- - r,
------------------- ....... ............ ..................... .................................................................................................. ..................................... .......
............ ............................................................................. ........................ .......... ... . ...
F --------------------------- --------------- -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- ....... .............. . ................. ............................... ...... ....... . ................... ................... ...... .....................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............... .. . .............................................. ....... ................................ ...... ........... ...................................... ............ ............
. . . . ............................................................................................................................................................... ............. ............. .................................. ................ T ................................... ...............
C679.14)
(326.67,733.43:
: DANNY WHALEY! SHTI 21 OCT 93 10167 AM

G¢.� f�f.L� F40� � .�� }•1Tc r` w�
04N P� VV �44L
I " 1 0-01

U. S. Department of Agriculture ` NC-EMG-34
File Code: 210
I-q
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR
Landowner Dan'n,��/�/ c -- _ County � 2
Community or Group No. M —L y Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Dater to Top of Dam Q,v Ft. Length of Flood Pool Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation _ 93
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. Elev.:Est. Elevation
Kind of :Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length: Width: Slope: Land Use Improvements Above :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain: Flood Plain
. _ Ft. Ft. % : Ft. Ft.
2
3
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach N�r� , �tnQf�x iw��tG_ JoDa - b�f4,
Hazard Classification of Dam @, b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Classification (I, II, II IV, V)
name
title
d
Concurred By
nametitle)
Y
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date p
r �
Date j 2i

SCS-ENG-5J8 ! y U. S. OEPARTWCNT OP AGRiCULTURE
P�"• 5-74 ` SOIL CONSERVATtON SERVICE
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
FARTSER'S NAME a r "�i�v �_ , DISTRICT
DATE — 4 ! COUNTY
S- C. S- PHOTO SHEET NO. — WORK UNIT —
WATERSHEI) AREA MEASUREMENTS
CROPLAND ACRES PASTURE ACRES
WOODLAND ACRES TOTAL ACRES POND CLASS WORK UNIT CONSERVATIONIST
SKETCH OF PROPOSED•POND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS WERE MADE (Appr= scale If"= feet)
Locate reArrence saint m unrer lineof dam and (dend(g on ske[ch.
■■■■■■■■■■®■®■■■■®®®■■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■■■�■■■■�■■■■■■■
■
■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■EE
EME■E.M■Ei"
MEME■■■E
■■■■■■■■■■■E■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
BORING NUMBER AND..
MCA" and and spillLoagr borings first - then pomded area and borrow pit baftngs - sevoraft with rd line.
Mull
MIMI®1f®lm'Ml0l®I
:
I©
®®!■I■!■�l
l
■I!i■l■l■I■l•!�I■I■'■I■l■I■■
®®:■�■�i�i=�■lr!■l■�■!■!■il■i■1■��■I■l■l�!
M■
■■i■'�l■�►■■I■l■1■19i■I■l■'■l■1■1■�■
®!�!1��!■l■I■f®�l■�■l■l!l■l■�l■!1■1■�■1■l■4■1■
■■MIENI
■!1®Nl■.■!■Bof■mf■!1■l■'l1■'�I■I■
®',■!!1■�■1®!4■■'��l■l!±!l■�I■l®i■:Ok■1l��1■
!�'■i!i■!■4®`■I■
�'!i■l■l■`.■i■i®l®l■■dl■If■
■l■
■�®�
i>l�l■I■�®;■l®
�®l■l■I■:■lam;®1®I®;®I■�■l■f!'
�®�4�1■�■®■l■■�®I■I■I■■1■�f■l■'
l
l
1
BORINGS MADE BY SIGNATURE & TITLE

r-
SGS-ENG-S-s I 11 U. S. DEPAftT MENT OF AGRICULTURE
r". 5-i0 Z.OSL CONSEFVATION SERVICE
SOIL INVESTICATIOIv TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF -PROPOSED POND SITE
FARMER-S NAIiE�'i►n VAeW DISTRICT
DATE— S 1s-g COUNTY
S. C. S. PHOTO SHEET NO. WORK UNIT
WATERSHEU AREA MEASUREb(Eh"I'S
CROPLAND ACRES PASTURE ACRES
WOODLAND ACRES TOTAL ACRES -POND CLASS WORK UNIT CONSERVATIONIST
SFu=H OF PROPOSEWPOND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS WERE MADE (Approz- scale l" - feet)
Locale rderence paint nn ccntcr line of dam and tdenfifp an skefch- = _
�����■�■ne■a■■����■■■ye
s
v�n�����ii���t■����ne�
iiii
iiiiiii
iiMESEE
i�iOt
MM
N MEN
■ice■
ME
i N■MME
���■����!
E
MEMO
'�iBORING
on
�EMENEENOW-0
NUMBER AND PROFILE
i
BORINGS NIA -DE BY � k o SIGNATURE & TITLE

x .i N ear• . "-Jr. c•rr-Fi -:Xr�A-�:.r�. a . -m . � � it:: :•s.r .,,., r,
ft
�.li..•�.�M�III if 111 _
II} I
C2 a
42
j a l
� C a
I' } t �• 3 i -�� jj d I '' I 1 d + V
V
` J u
I _�e{._} 1 I I. i I_9 i � i ' } , �• I I � ` L � � ' , I � , f'!
_L r _{_. _.i... �._I�!'� ••� E r � I i •.J i i.�...�».1 � f � • � ; } ,• ; j��... I .-..'�,..` � 1' �^� ... � ' , .� :� _, ..' I�.-I- .. - .._ .I ...+- ;... _
tT
14
r-1 ,.tom '1•-�-y-s-Iw.`E.r s . �___ wa.w�r .r.+a�.f.•' .1 -.I .� r. 1--y —•—• `'7•-t—:.rTr•• r1. i I _ _ • i f� ' f ;.S- 1 .��.��.,..�_i . ,-. y --.i y
tr
I �
--i of
tr
It
jl
j• }"'ram-.�_..., ��!1;..� �, i i � ^_. �!'�---__.-..... ... ?" _ �. � _. ... '�° _ � �^ � � ... .�
I ffi. I I 10 -�
- .. �4GL•i_!Yr..i.�. i..[•.77'�'+.•.'l:X�r •':lam � f ,r —. , .y ..f 1'. �t . _ 7 _ � .. . •- P wY.' '• � ! i• 'k: : 1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Janes B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Danny Whaley
Cedar Lane Farm
213 Lyman Rd
Beulaville NC 28518
Dear Danny Whaley:
[D E N R
December 2, 1997
,RE C,El ,V,E8 DEC o
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310066
Cedar Lane Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Duplin County
In accordance with your application received on August 26. 1997, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Farm No. 31-66, authorizing the operation of an animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with the State's General Pernik
(attached). This approval shall consist of the operation of this 'system including, but not limited to, the
management of animal waste from the Cedar Lane Farm, located in Duplin County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than 5280 Feeder to Finish and the application to a minimum of 40 acres of land as
specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2001. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system. in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of
wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data
and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater
than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
In accordance with General Statue 143-215.1OC, Animal Waste Management Plans shall include
the following components:
- A checklist of odor sources and best management practices to minimize these sources.
- A checklist of insect sources and best management practices to minimize these sources.
- Provisions set forth for acceptable methods of disposing of mortalities.
- Provisions regarding emergency action plans.
Your existing Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must include the above elements, by
December 31, 1998. Documentation of the certification must be available to inspectors onsite. Submittal
of the amended certification statement shall be required upon renewal of your permit coverage in 2001. .
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, Borth Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
-e,P�IA. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County Health Department
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

I.
Depa ment
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
State of North Carolina
of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the
Division. Please review the information for completeness and make any corrections
which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please
complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered.
Application Date:
RECENTED DEC 1997 .
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials —
1. One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit -.Animal r
Waste Operations;
_1
2. Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and ;=
field locations where animal waste is disposed;
3. Two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). if the facility does
not have a CAWMP, one must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations. 2)4. )
II. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Farm's name: Cedar Lane Farm
2. Print Land Owner's name: Danny Whale
3. Land Owner's Mailing address: _213 Lyman Rd
City: Beulaville NC Zip: _28518
Telephone Number. 298-9759
4. County where farm is located: Duplin
5. Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): 1112 mile S, of Beulaville on SR 1801.,,__..,_
6. Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): Led ell
ame (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): 9f Clcd 7. Lessc4/ Zlegrator's
31 - 66
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 1 of 3

III. OPERATION INFORMATION:
1. Farm No.: 31-66
2. Operation Description: Swine operation
Feeder to Finish
5280 - Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; E] no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
Tyne of Swine No. of Animals Tyne of Poultry No. of Animals Tyne of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals: _6
3. Acreage cleared and available for application: 40.00 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP):
4. Number of Lagoons: 2 ; Total Capacity: 1. . ��v Cubic Feet (ft3)
Number of Storage Ponds: ; Total Capacity: Cubic Feet 0)
5. Is animal waste being applied on any field which has subsurface drains? YE or , NO (please circle one)
6. Are subsurface drains present in th fv—i
cinity of or under the lagoon? E r NO (please circle one)
IV. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I,
this application for &gg4 e 4-
has been reviewed by me and is accurate a:
application are not completed and that if al
will be returned t� as incomplete. /
Signature
V . MANAGER'S CERTIFICA
I, - - &W ��aI2V
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1I.2), attest that
IQI ., (Farm name listed in question II.1)
to to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
Datee/!?,& 7
: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question II.6), attest that this
application for (Farm name listed in question iI.l)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.n
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX ,29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 2 of 3

�'>•, � 1, br.;r ..ram �k a. �' h-,i '. ,�
a t
1
J.
t
r 1 \ ^�
NAY~r- '`�• -1 l �
��- 1 11h 4.1 a•F { s r _. - f !', ' � ��, t O � � .ice
>_'t• _ .l' '11 \1 „ 1� '~ t r � f , � •' . r.• 1 f' 4 ��.1 i �5 T :+S

V-WASTE: *;--ZA.G -_= PI..'_AT CScZTIFIC-TION FOR Ni.W OR =PANDER YEEDLCTS
Please rat%L-_-j t;a c leted for= to the Division of E_n_2LV_aat at
the ac'd;esa ca tha reveraa aida of tlia fc==.
Name of fa--m (Please print):
Address:__DaLh»•a je�,/_.
Phone No. 2 �3
Countjr : V%p n1.1
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude:n A'_L jZL /23 I± (required) . Also,
please attach a copy of a County road map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.): '
Desicn capacity (numrer of animals) :_ 1"1 6 Q 78 -<-a
Average size of operation (12 month population avg.):_ �i4 O d .
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres):_
Tec!:_-ical Specialist CQrti.fication
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and water
Conservation Commission pursuant to I5A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new or
expanded animal waste management system as installed for the fa_ named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
ISA NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria-hasr�e hee_uverified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party); access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm.,
Dame of 'radical Specialist (Please P_ir}t) : ! ec� G• )'k
Affiliation: � LK 1 _i c, V711 die N
Address (Agency): Phone No. d�Z
i 6 �
Signature-,=/Y1��J �- � _ _ � Date: 6 -
Owner/Haaagsr Agreement
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) )snow that any additional expansion to the e;cisting
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification Co be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a .man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a seorm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the fare and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
ATaae of Land cw-.:ar (Please Print) :
Signature:
.q=e of -a -lager, if different from own
Date -
(Please print):
Signature: Date:
,Qt.e: .". change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer.
DEM USE ONL`Z:ACIiEW'#

.LNi".AI. WAST.a.. CSR_I?ICA=ION FOR 3=1STING FZZZ 0 S
Dleaae rate= the completed fo= to the Division of Zavi_o=eatal Hamagama._t at
the address on the reverse side of this form.
Narie of farm (please print) DA JkL4 SAL
Ma11ing .address
his kLLLAd W,F rar. o g -18 Phone No.
-- - County (of farm) : ZVO044Al
Fa-m location: Latitude and Longitude�b� 'a" /_U �?, (required) AlSO,
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.): ;fWI UE
Design capacity (number of animals); Sl�Bo f9PVUI IAIG
Average size of operation (12 month population avg.):
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres): .Ie• ___
cc�aaa�asaaaa3a�aaasss=saaaaaaiaa:s==a:asaaa=vaaa��s�asa=seat=r�saas:ss�saaas�sx
Tech:.ical specialist certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6r .0005, I certify that the
existing animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal
_aize yla.n that" the _.=intanaa.ncq
specifications of the Division of Environmental Manage-ment and the USDA. -Soil
Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation
Commission pursuanc to ISA NCAC 2H.0217 and 1SA NCAC 6F .0001-.000-5. The
Following elements and their correspondina minimum criteria have been verified
by me or other designated technical specialists and are included in the plan as
applicable: minimum separations (buffers), adequate quantity and amount of land
For'waste utilization (or use of third pasty); access or ownership of prone=
waste application equipment; schedule for timing of applications; application
rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge of pollutants from
stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print) L- *4Y6N
Affiliation (Agency) . r?A CLf,S__a.2Q_i
Address: P 0. 9RA. MA S5 6kAOMW, &V. ZA,34B Phone No .410 2Q3- 3434-
S ignature : 17011 Date :
333-�-3-i i7Z3ZilZ'��iZ�1�Ei Z.73ZZZ�IZZZ�`J.'ti3�J�Z�Z3ZZ i=i ZZ3Z31==ii333 i---
Owaew /Xaaager Agreement
1 (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the fa-rm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
o� the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will
require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental
management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state either directly through a man-made conveyance or through runuii iroin a.
storm event less severe than the 25--year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will
be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation
District.
Name of Land Y (Plea e P n DAKAY W14ALEY
Signature:Date //� �r
:��
:ram. of Hatagdr, if different from owner (Please print) :
Signature: Date:
Soto: A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a title trarsfe=.-
D'S,M USE' ONLY: ACE I

IV
WASTE UTILIZATION FLAN
FOR
Danny Whaley
Beulaville NC 28518
August 25, 1993
Your animal waste utilization plan has been specifically
developed for your 5280 FEEDER TO FINISH _.SWINE operation.
The plan is based on the soil types, crops to be grown, and
method of application, for your particular operation. The waste
must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the
animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial
fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as
the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each
application and annual soil tests are encouraged so that all
plant nutrients and lime can be balanced for realistic yield
of the crops to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value
of the waste and to ensure that;it is applied in an environ-
mentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs
of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste.
The amount of available nitrogen for plant use• is dependant on
the method of application. Soil type is important due to
different leaching potential and yield potential. Waste shall
not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre
per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land
when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may
result in runoff to surface waters. Wind conditions should
also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems.
To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and
reduce the potential for pollution, waste should be applied to
a growing crop or not more than 30 days prior to planting.
Soil incorporation of the waste will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste are based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Annual
acreage requirements may be more or less depending on the
specific waste analysis report for your facility at the time
of irrigation.
9

r
.Your waste utilization plan is based on the f ollowing:
r .�L
TABLE A. AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR
-----------------------------------------------------------
--------------
!. NUMBER OF I ITONS WASTE PER I TONS WASTE I
LANIMALS I TYPE OF -ANIMALS 1 1000 ANIMALS I PER YEAR I
----------- ------------------------------
1. 5280 1 FEEDER TO FINISH 1 1900 1 10032 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE S.
SUMMARY
OF CROPS
BY FIELD
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TRACT
I FIELD
-------
I SOIL
I -------
I ACRES I CROP 1CROPCODEI
I 1-------------------------------
I---------
1 70870
I
1 1
1 NoA
------- l I
120.7 1 HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS HAY I BH I
1 70870
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 2
1 NoA
120.3 1 HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS HAY I BH I
TABLE C. SUMMARY OF CROPS, YIELD, AND NUTRIENT REQUIREMENTS BY SOIL TYPE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I CROP ISOILIYIELDIUNITSITOTAL NI *TOTAL P I *TOTAL K I
I ---------------------------- I----I-----l-----I I I I
-------- ---------- ----------
I HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS HAYINoA16_-- --- -- OITONS1300 101140 - 160 1
- ---- -
* Total phosphate and potash amounts should be confirmed with a soil test.
K
TABLE D. WASTE MANAGEMENT BY FIELD
I I I CROPIWASTE APPLI TYPE
IWASTE N
I COMM NI
MONTHS TO APPLY I
I TRACT IFIELDI CODE] METHOD I WASTE
I------- ----- I
I LB/AC
I LB/AC I
ANIMAL WASTE l
I,-----1---------- I -------
170870 1 1 1 SH (IRRIGATE ISWINE
I --------
1 300
I ------- I-------------------1
1 0 1
APRIL TO OCT I
170670 1 2 1 BH !IRRIGATE $SWINE
1 300
1 0 1
t
APRIL TO OCT-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
c
K 4
ni

The acres, crops, and application method shown in the preceding tables will
accommodate approximately 5347.8 animals of the type shown in Table A.
If more commercial fertilizer is used than is shown in Table D, then
:. additional acres of land will be needed. A O - 15 feet wide permanent
grass filter strip should be seeded along all ditches infields that
receive animal waste.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Prepared by:
Concurred in
e Wc_1
Date
7

F
United States Soil
Department of Conservation
Agriculture Service
0
P. O. Box 277
KenansviRe, NC 28349
Telephone [phone]
WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY SITE EVALUATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
NAME LOCATION f.
TELEPHONE q 161 2qp--- '42—y' SIZE OF OPERATION_�2 �?D
LOCATION DATA
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER ) 400,41- (J-, , /nrl )
NUMBER OF HOUSES WITHIN 2000 FEET OF SITE _ I O
IS SITE WITHIN 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? YES NO ✓
IS SITE AT LEAST 100 FEET FROM A "BLUE LINE" PERENNIAL STREAM? YES NO
IS SITE WTTHTN 1 MILE ZONING JURISDICTION OF A MUNICIPALITY? YES NO .
if yes, landowner should consult with local zoning board about required permits
WETLANDS
WILL SITE INVOLVE CLEARING WOODLAND OF, ANY NON CROPLAND ? YES NO ✓
IF YES, HAS PRODUCER COMPLETED AN AD-1026 FORM? YES NO
DOES NON WETLAND NEED TO BE MEASURED BY REGISTERED SURVEYOR PRIOR TO
APPROVING WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN YES NO ✓
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PRODUCER TO CONTACT TIIE US
ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND THE NC DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TO
DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL. PERMITS ARE REQUIRED. NO WETLANDS SHOULD BE ALTERED UNTIL
PRODUCER RECEIVES WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM SCS, US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND NC
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
WASTE MANAGEMENT -- VALID ONLY IF WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN ATTACHED
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY LAND APPLY WASTE? YES ✓ NO
IF NO, DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE LAND? YES NO
SEE ATTACHED PLAN FOR SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS
SOIL INVESTIGATION -- VALID ONLY IF SOIL INVESTIGATION SHEET ATTACHED
IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR LAGOON? YES ✓ NO
IS A CLAY LINER REQUIRED? YES NO ✓
IF YES, IS CLAY AVAILABLE ONSITE? YES NO QUESTIONABLE
IS A CORE TRENCH REQUIRED? YES ✓ NO
SITE APPROVED YES :` NO CONDITIONAL f
COMMENTS
I
II
APPROVAL BASED ON SCS STANI7.1lil,S VALID FOR 60 DAYS FROM DATE SIGNED. THIS APPROVAL k
;SU11JE�C': TO CIIANG;' BAS;:U ON ("EAN`GiS lit NATIONAL, STAT;:, O`' ,.00A'.
The `Sol Conse�rva on SeU.75 l l I:ll1' F'Rf1tr3 litiilDl.;�ICE ATTIME OF DESIGN.
rvICU
is an agency of the ,,r�,�% i
Department of Ag6culture SIGNATURE-,�C—.1-- , DATE
a

US Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
NC -CPA 16
4-92
Land User/Owner are w County— n I ,"I
Location/Tract & Field Number D 0 Acreage
Prepared by SSG T Date
Brief Description of Planned Practice/RMS/Project Measure:
Environmental Factors and Resources to Identify and Evaluate J
1. is wetland included in the planning area: (References: NCPM;
190-GM 410.26; Hydric soils list; Classification of Wetlands and
Dee water Habitats of the U.S.; National Wetlands Inventory Maps;
NFSAM.
No
k 'Yes - If yes,
-- Identify types present
-- Attach environmental evaluation showing what effect
planned assistance will have on wetland and how this
assistance is within policy
-- Have needed permits (LAMA, DEM, Corps, etc.) been
obtained by the landuser?
--- Make sure no planned practices will put the landowner in
violation of Swampbuster
2. Endangered and/or threatened species: (References: 190-GM
410.22; Technical Guide Section I-i(13) and Section I-vii
Lf No Yes
-- Identify species whose range and habitat needs indicate
they might occur in planning area
-- Identify on map any designated critical habitat

Ki
U.,
3. Is a designated natural or scenic area included in the planning
• area or will planned actions impact on an adjacent natural or
scenic area? (References: 190-GM 410-23 and .24)
L.-' No
e
• Yes If yes., encourage landuser to- consult with concerned
agencies.,, societies, and individuals to. arrive at
mutually, satisfactory land use. and treatment..
4. Does the• planning: area- include, the 19.Q:-yearr - flood. plain?.
(References-1. NCPM'*- 190--GK HUD. Flood PIC-Lin. maps-).
NO
Yes If yes:':
Is- the- asslstedw action. likely to have. significant
adverse effects- on. existing: natural and beneficial
values. in; the, flood. plain? --
Is there- a. prActical. alternative, out -side: the flood..
plain"."�
Has. tlxe flood plain- been used foz agricultural
production for at least 3. of. the- last 5- years?
5.. Is an, archaeological caor historical site. located in- the. planning -
area? (References NCPM;. 420-GM 4Q1,;- Nat!-'.Qnal. Register of
Historic Places)
L,--, N-0-
Yes . - If- yes,... have: steps, been; taken). to ensure the
protection.of this aLrea?-
6.. Are there any, prime-,' unique-,. or locally important farmlands- in
the operating. unit?, (References: IXO.--GM);
No
✓ Yes - If yes-, identify-- on: a sails map or legend./V%,I, /&A
T. Will the action result- in. sodbustincj?-.-
L--' No
Yes
8. Will the action result in swampbusting?
NO Yes-
9. there a potential for- controversy?
No Yes -
A I, . .
From whom? ric7do 14 0.4 y

lo.` Are permits required?/Should the person contact permit agencies?
5' No Yes
When an environmental factor or resource is identified on the
site, the user will refer to the appropriate reference for policy
and document the appropriate action in the notes portion of this
form.
NOTES, DOCUMENTATION, FOLLOW-UP
O FAI �e9;sfr� tJ3�

ilUrc- r1'oa-,- Pits PSWCD 1
L1VESE iIOCK WASTE SAMPLING A`,f:LYS'. S, 11NO CALCULAT 10iN OF L ND i,FLICAT I0IN R :TES
I. SA11PLE COLLECTION -~
A. Liquid Manure Slurry
1_ Under -slotted -floor pit
a. Use a length of 112" conduit open on one end and that can be
easily sealed on the other end (e.g., by placing one's thumb
over the end of the conduit),
b. With both ends of the conduit open, extend it into the manure
to the pit floor.
c. Seal the upper end of the conduit trapping the manure that has
entered the lower end, remove and empty into a bucket or container.
c. Collect samples from at least 5 locations or at least enough
for a total of 1 quart of slurry.
e. Thoroughly mix this slurry and empty approximately 1/2 pint
into sample container.
2. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. make sure the manure has been well mixed or homogenized with a
liquid manure chopper -agitator pump or propeller agitator.
b. Take samples from approximately 5 locations in the pit, from the
agitator pump, or from the,manure spreader and place.in a bucket.
F c. Thoroughly mix and empty 1�j2 pint into sample container.
Il. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place the sample for analysis into a flexible or expandable container that
can be sealed. The container should be rinsed clean with water and free
of any residues but should not be chlorinated or treated in any other way.
Dry litter may also be placed in a sealed plastic bag such as a freezer bag.
B. The sample should be refrigerated, iced or cooled, if possible, or trans-
ferred to the lab immediately.
C, Hand -delivery is the most reliable way of sample transfer, but it can also
be mailed.
D. If mailed, sample container should first be protected with a packing material
such as newspaper, then boxed or packaged with wrapping paper and taped.
E. The NCDA Plant Analysis Lab provides this service for a nominal fee of
$4 per sample which should be forwarded along with the sample.

PSWCD 1
Address: Plant Analysis nLabr F,gr Z cu7 tune
<<
�=.•.,�t�=;. Agronomic Division
V
Blue Ridge Road Center
Raleigh, NC 27611
'_ , Ph• [phone]
- Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
F. Request that as a minimum the following analyses be performed:
_ 1. Total nitrogen (TKN)
2. Ammonia nitrogen (NH N)
"3. Total phosphorus .(V 3
4. Potassium .(K)
5. Dry litter samples should also include a total solids (TS) analysis.
G. Other analyses performed at no extra cost by NCDA include trace minerals.

PSWCD 2
I. S"i.PLE COLLLCTIO1 '
B. Lagoon Liquid
1. Collect approximately 112 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from the
inflow pipe to the flush tanks.
2. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on the end of a 1'0-15
foot long pole.
b. Extend the bottle 10-15 feet away from the bank edge.
c. Brush away any floating scum or debris so it is not collected
with sample.
d. Submerge the bottle within l foot of the liquid surface.
e. Repeat at approximately 5 locations around the lagoon, place
into a bucket, thoroughly mix, and empty 1 pint into sample
container.
3. From a multi --stage lagoon system collect sample from lagoon that
is going to be irrigated from.
II. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
q
A. Place the sample for analysis into a flexible or expandable container that
can be sealed. The container should be rinsed clean with water and free
of any residues but should not be,ghlorinated or treated in any other way.
Dry litter may al i�o be placed in is,eal ed plastic bag such as a freezer bag.
B. The sample should be refrigerated, iced or cooled, if possible, or trans-
ferred to the lab immediately.
C. Hand -delivery is the most reliable way of sample transfer, but it can also
be mailed.
D. If mailed, sample container should first be protected with a packing material
such as newspaper, then .boxed or packaged with wrapping paper and taped.
E. The NCDA Plant Analysis -Lab provides this service for a -nominal fee of
$:4 per sample which should be forwarded along with the sample.
1. Address: N. C. Department of Agriculture
Plant Analysis Lab
Agronomic Division
Blue Ridge Road Center
Raleigh, NC Z7611
Ph: (919) ; 33-2655
Attn: Dr. Rzy Campbell

PSWCD 2
Request that as a 101,iiiwt- the 0110 w iiq analyses be performed:
1. Total nitrogen (TKN)
2- Ammonia nitrogen NH N)
3. Total phosphorus TP
4 Potassium (K)
5. Dry litter samples should also include a total solids (TS) analysis.
G. Other analyses performed at no extra cost by NCDA include trace minerals.
A
1'�

r � Mom_ n •4r �y.� ' 13i7+� ...
�7 `11 y '�`� 1 ,I� � �' ri { r ' y � RX• r •,-fir
,aYa ��- .. s q� .4, •,15� ,M.r a.i F V4i- - - - r:. +l,r. � � � �.�.
�" .j r• ' - � � � ti rT r+lr � r - .. F - _ I r ;��r�
JA
-`•�'-� '�' ��•�:� - ir.1't Ao ''i.4a �; � � r ..^1�r t - kFwC'�
10
�4��
'� �. 1 , b b � _ ``i'�'i;j; N. f' V`dI r�S3 9h•'� Y.
' 4r '� its it"„ 1•�' +'�� � +

M-
LU
Z
0
N

o
`

Fill
,
x yea i
�
q l
YJ
�":� . �/
"M
• �\
� �� � (Jl I
P\
shy* � Qom. \ �
a nn -
� '� a;
�
x • xsvr se'ni✓avvM I N
�
R •�
25
�\ _
W
F
a
m
�6s -.

'9 TLI

State of North Carolina IT
Department of Environment,
MWAA
Health and Natural Resources • a
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary p E H N F�
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
August 14, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Danny Whaley
Cedar Lane Farm
213 Lyman Rd
Beulaville NC 28518
Farm Number: 31-66
Dear Danny Whaley:
You are hereby notified that Cedar Lane Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC, must apply
for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has
thirty (30) days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance
with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date.
Your application must be returned within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the
application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for
each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package. The
signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location map, and
two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the application
package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any question concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at [phone] extension
363 or Dave Holsinger with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely
�
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Wilmington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/ 10 % post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Danny Whaley
Cedar Lane Farm
213 Lyman Rd
Beulaville NC 28518
ov*w
EDEHNFR
November 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Cedar Lane Farm
Facility ID#: 31-66
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Whaley:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P. ., ' ector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, N%fFAX 919-715 3060
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 An Equal FAX
Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 a 50°/6 recycled/10% post -consumer paper

ANZK1L WASTE ICINAGME2= PLaN =TIFICATION FOR NEW OR n+oANDBD FEPj+¢.�gj}%/� [�y. ���
Plaaea ratu--n the cc=, letad fo-^-. to toe Diviaicn of Zvi-c_eatal-,-.ga-*i'�)'�pLn(1)C�Jja, (�j (�{
addreea oa the reverse aide of this fora. JUN
28
Name of farm (Please p nt):
Address: Dah%.4 uluhtw At1 g..,lnu:ll.._.AIC. a ff14
No
County:_ Dre12.,, --- ¢ Ing BRAWN
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude:a.� j& /-U !a (required}.,, Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified.'
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.):
Design capacity (number of animals) : it b D
Average size of operation (12 month population avg.): 44 00
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres):�{�
Tach.:ical Spaeiallst Cartifieation
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to i5A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new or
expanded animal waste management system as installed for the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria -have -been verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable. minimum separations (buffers); liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party) ; access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm..
Kama of -Technical specialist (Please P_iryt): ///fC1'la'Q-�Z. 54
Affiliation: W A JV � 19 VII 62 _ N
Address (Agency): Phone No. 9Vo-z '
Signature: - {/ `• rtVc, Date: o -O"�
Owner/ifanager Agreement
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treat -.:eat and storage systera or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25-year. 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
Name of Land Owner (Please Print):
Signature: Date
Name of 'laaagar, if d' ferent from own (Please print):_
Signature: Date:
Note: A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer.
------- DEM USE ONLY:ACNEW#
3144LO

�
\
`
!q
44\
,�;,
Ell
J6
§� ` �
/�
/~_
s
ioN
A 'sa
c
L -
"I
0
u
N
T * y
A

REGISTRATION FORM FOR ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATI
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Re "ol
urc"C oyv
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
G ..
If the animal waste management system for your feedlot ation is
designed to serve more than or equal to 100 head of V-1 7
horses, 250 swine, 1,000 sheep, or 30,000 birds that are ser-'d by
a liquid waste system, then this form must be filled out and mailed
by December 31, 1993 pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217(c) in order. to be
deemed permitted by DEM. Please print
/clearly.
Farm Name: <I J` 1V q'1 uj'W nl
Mailing Address: 9/3 4yrnA<,i enact
�layi/lt �. ZIP <Z-S'S_19
County: on;i ' II Phone No.97y-zyg_,p?.Sy
Owner(s) Name:
Manager(s) Name:
Lessee Name:
Farm Location (Be as specific as possible• road names, direction,
milepost, etc.) : /%L ^; Saurti a r �Se,fi,u,ll a,✓
$}nre 104.47 -* 1gQ1
Latitude/Longitude if known:
Design capacity of animal waste management s stem (Number and type
n of cofined animal (s)) : S� 8D',1/i�,".,ia
Average animal population on the farm (Number and type of animals)
raised) : Sa.Bo
Year Production Began: MZ ASCS Tract No.:
Ty a of Waste Management System Used:
Acres -Available for Land A licatio ste: 4zp
Owners) Signatures) : DATE:II�S 3
—.._ . DATE:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural'Resources 4 • •
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary ID E H
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
March 23, 1994
Danny Whaley
213 Lyman Road
Beulaville NC 28518
Dear Mr. Whaley:
This is to inform you that your completed registration form required by the recently
modified nondischarge rule has been received by the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM), Water Quality Section.
On December 10, 1992 the Environmental Management Commission adopted a water
quality rule which governs animal waste management systems. The goal of the rule is for animal
operations to be managed such that animal waste is not discharged to surface waters of the state.
The rule allows animal waste systems to be "deemed permitted" if certain minimum criteria are
met (15A NCAC 2H .0217). By submitting this registration you have met one of the criteria for
being deemed permitted.
We would like to remind you that existing feedlots which meet the size thresholds listed
in the rule, and any new or expanded feedlots constructed between February 1, 1993 and
December 31, 1993 must submit a signed certification form (copy enclosed) to DEM by
December 31. 1997, New or expanded feedlots constructed after December 31, 1993 must
obtain signed certification before animals are stocked on the farm. Certification of an
approved animal waste management plan can be obtained after the Soil and Water Conservation
Commission adopts rules later this year.
We appreciate you providing us with this information. If you have any question about
the new nondischarge rule, please contact David Harding at [phone].
Sincerely,
a
Steve Tedder, Chief
enc: Water Quality Section
P.O. Box 29535, Rdeigh, North Cororina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10%post-consumer paper

REGISTRATION FORM FOR ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resourcesy
Division of Environmental Management _
Water Quality Section
If the animal waste management system for your feedlot operati,gn, is,,_j�
designed to serve more than or equal to 100 head of cans;-2S�
horses, 250 swine, 1,000 sheep, or 30,000 birds that are served by
a liquid waste system, then this form must be filled out and mailed
by December 31, 1993 pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217(c) in order to be
deemed permitted by DEM_ Please print clearly_
Farm Name: ]I .'KtvkL4 b-Il ikde,- Ceda, Ze,vYe-F5-t-
Mailing Address: yI>9,9i✓ /fl?"
ec .1Gs�r1!6!� JI/_C ZIP %$
County: (Scup/in/ Phone No.as8-�"7S9
Owner (s) Name: ]��L}nfN y w%-(e4
Manager(s) Name: <<
Lessee Name:
Farm Location (Be as specific as possible: roa names, direction,
milepost, etc.) : 1 vrha', ��- F I✓C.�2 fiOD/tht:�i�e%
Latitude/Longitude if known:
Design capacity of animal waste management s�,�'stem (Number and type
of confined animal (s)) : '.zS�G - cxDa vd"n 4 'fC S2�o
F:.) r -'4 :" new f-. ay./
Average animal population on the farm (Number and type of animal(s)
raised) : FJAA-tt � Qi=c- h ka :
Year Production Began:�y9a ASCS Tract No.: -7- 70S76
Type of Wa to M nagement Rstem Used: lA�er���✓71��az.�
Acres Available for Land'A ication of as
Owner(s) Signature(s): DATE:g/f
DATE:

_ State rt North Carolina
` Department of Environment,
'
Health and Natural Resources
• •
Division of Environmental Management
_
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
ID E H N R
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 22, 1993
Danny Whaley
213 Lyman Rd.
Beulaville NC 28518
Dear Mr. Whaley,
This is to inform you that your completed registration form required by the recently
modified nondischarge rule has been received by the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM), Water Quality Section.
On December 10, 1992 the Environmental Management Commission adopted a water
quality rule which governs animal waste management systems. The goal of the rule is for animal
operations to.be managed such,that animal waste is not discharged to surface waters of the state.
The rule allows animal waste systems to be "deemed permitted" if certain minimum criteria are
met (15A NCAC 2H .0217). By submitting this registration you have met one of the criteria for
being deemed permitted
We would like to remind you that existing feedlots which meet the size thresholds listed
in the rule, and any new or expanded feedlots constructed between February 1, 1993 and
December 31, 1993 must submit a signed certification form to DEM by December 31, 1997.
New or expanded feedlots constructed after December 31, 1993 must obtain signed certification
before animals are stocked on the farm. Certification of an approved animal waste
management plan can be obtained after the Soil and Water Conservation Commission adopts
rules later this year.
We appreciate you providing us with this information. If you have any question about
the new nondischarge rule, please contact David Harding at [phone].
.Sincerely,
Steve Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
P.O. Box 29635. Rdeigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

r'`1: '.ice•
REGISTRATION FORM FOR ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERAT/IONS' u'
Department of Environment, Health and Natural FiesourCes`'
Division of Environmental Management Ica
Water Quality Section
If the animal waste management system for your feedlot op� ati �s
designed to serve more than or equal to 100 head of cat 75
horses, 250 swine, 1,000 sheep, or 30,000 birds that are served by
a liquid waste system, then this form must be filled out and mailed
by December 31, 1993 pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217(c) in order to be
deemed permitted by DEM. Please print clearly.
Farm Name: /PTV/VyC6fL�K Lc/" 1%19,4 CeGCre ZI-7✓P
Mailing Address: 2 X '41 /3
1 e�.Jac,se. xfx, ZIPa--QS/S
County: �J)'Pli-V Phone No—Z19-4799
Owner (s) Name: I )RA/NU wi., 5 LA4-r*
Manager(s) Name: t//
Lessee Name: IV,
Farm Location (Be as specific as possible: road names, direction,
milepost, etc.): Le�iYo Z3e— ;oi� n,y SQ./goi a�
Latitude/Longitude if known:
Design capacity of animal waste management system (Number and type
of confined animal (s)) : 352-o a o s
Average animal population on the farm (Number and type of animals)
raised) f
Year Production Began: 4gL ASCS Tract/No.:' f '7dfflb /fW/
Type of Waste Management System Used: �4 WZ,-e,-
Acres Avai lable' for Land -A 1' cation of Was =T3-L
Owner(s) Signature(s): DATE.
_ DATE:
31- I88 ,

S
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512,North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
March 9, 1993
Danny L. Whaley
RL 2 Box 49B
Beulaville NC 28518
Dear Mr. Whaley,
This is to inform you that your completed registration form required by the recently
modified nondischarge rule has been received by the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM), Water Quality Section.
On December 10, 1992 the Environmental Management Commission adopted a water
quality rule which governs animal waste management systems. The goal of the rule is for animal
operations to be managed such that animal waste is not discharged to surface waters of the state.
The rule allows animal waste systems to be "deemed permitted" if certain minimum criteria are
met (15A NCAC 2H .0217). By submitting this registration you have met one of the criteria for
being deemed permitted
We would like to remind you that existing feedlots which meet the size thresholds listed
in the rule, and any new or expanded feedlots constructed between February 1, 1993 and
December 31, 1993 must submit a signed certification form to DEM by December 31, 1997.
New or expanded feedlots constructed after December 31, 1993 must obtain signed certification
before animals are stocked on the farm. Certification of an approved animal waste
management plan can be obtained after the Soil and Water Conservation Commission adopts
rules later this year.
We appreciate you providing us with this information. If you have any question about
the new nondischarge rule, please contact David Harding at [phone].
Sincerely,
?A,/-7417
Steve Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
REGIONAL OFFICES
Asheville Fayeatville Moor s ille Raleigh Washington Wilmington Wiastnn-Salem
704a51-6208 9191486-1341 704/663-1699 9191571-4700 919,946-6481 919(395-3900 919896-7007
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535. Raleigh, Narch Carolina.27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportmtiry Af —Live Acdcm Employer