310022_HISTORICAL_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA J
Department of Environmental Qual

OF W ATE
Michael F. Easley, Governor
9pG
William G. Ross
'4
Vj
Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 28, 2005
Mr. William Dexter Jackson
Dexter Jackson Farm
814 Country Club Road
Mt. Olive, NC 28365
RE: Acknowledgment of Receipt of Payment —
Case No. PC 05-001 , T'CEIVED
Farm # 31-22 MAY 0 2 2005
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Jackson:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 2013 in the amount of $2,587.73 on
April 28, 2005. This payment satisfies in full the civil assessment and the case has been closed.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
S�
Steve Lewis
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Q�ilfi'ngtonlR'egionaLOffice
File # PC 05-001
APS Central Files
JhCarolina
ura!!y
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Internet: h4p://h2o.enr.sta1e.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Phone [phone] Customer Service
Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Lewis, Environmental Specialist III
Animal Feeding Operations Permitting and Compliance Unit
FROM: Chester Cobb, Environmental Specialist 11
Wilmington Regional Office
THROUGH: Charles F. Stehman, Regional Environmental Supervisor ! (2�
Wilmington Regional Office
SUBJECT: Enforcement Report
William Dexter Jackson
Dexter Jackson Farm
Facility Number: 31-22
Duplin County
DATE: February 25, 2005
Attached please find the subject enforcement report which concludes that William
Dexter Jackson violated Condition No. I. 1. of the NPDES Permit NCA200000 by
discharging waste into a roadside and Condition No. II. 4. by applying waste such that
runoff occurred.
On September 20, 2004, Mr. Chester Cobb from the Wilmington Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quality inspected the Dexter Jackson Farm in response to a complaint
of waste in a roadside ditch. Upon inspection of the farm, Mr. Cobb observed waste in
the roadside ditch and waste running down corn rows from. the land application site to
the field corner. Waste had discharged from the field corner to the roadside ditch.
It is recommended that appropriate civil penalties be assessed in accordance with G.S.
143-215.6A(a)(2). It is also recommended that all of the enforcement costs incurred in
the investigation be recovered in the amount of $587.73 pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 1438-282.1(b)(8).
If you have any questions, please contact me at 910-395-3900.
Attachments
CC" Wilmington Regional Office (Entire Enforcement Package)
S:kWQS1ANIMALSIDUPLIN12005131-22131-22 Memo
NiuthCaroiina
�//aiura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Phone [phone] Customer Service
Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington, NC 28405 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110°% Post Consumer Paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF DUPLIN
IN THE MATTER OF
WILLIAM DEXTER JACKSON
FOR VIOLATIONS OF CONDITIONS
OF NPDES GENERAL PERMIT
NCA200000
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
FILE NO. PC
FINDINGS AND DECISION
} AND ASSESSMENT OF
} CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I,
Theodore L. Bush, Jr., Chief of the Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water (DWQ),
make the following:
1. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. William Dexter Jackson owns and operates the Dexter Jackson Farm, a swine
animal operation located north of Faison, NC along SR 1302 in Duplin County.
B: William Dexter Jackson was issued Certificate of Coverage NCA231022 under
Swine Waste Management System General NPDES Permit NCA200000 for the
Dexter Jackson Farm on April 9, 2003, effective on April 9, 2003, with an
expiration date of July 1, 2007.
C. Condition No. I. 1. of the NPDES Permit NCA200000 states in part, "Any
discharge or application of waste to a ditch that drains to surface waters or
wetlands is prohibited except..."
D. Condition II. 4. of the NPDES Permit NCA200000 states, "Land application rates
shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates
exceed the Plant Available Nitrogen rate for the receiving crop. In no case shall
land application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff during any given
application event."

E. On September 20, 2004, a DWQ staff person inspected the Dexter Jackson Farm
because of a complaint received of waste running off a sprayfield into a road
ditch. During the inspection, the DWQ staff person observed waste running off
the application site to the corner of the sprayfield. The DWQ staff person also
observed waste ponded in the roadside ditch where it had discharged from the
sprayfield.
F. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $587.73
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. William Dexter Jackson is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A
pursuant to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. William Dexter Jackson may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to
G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2) which provides that a civil penalty of not more than
twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) per violation may be assessed against a
person who is required but fails to apply for or to secure a permit required by G.S.
143-215.1.
C. William Dexter Jackson violated Condition No, 1. 1. of the NPDES Permit
NCA200000 by discharging waste into the roadside ditch.
D. William Dexter Jackson violated Condition No. H. 4. of the NPDES Permit
NCA200000 by applying waste such that runoff occurred.
E. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against William
Dexter Jackson pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.I(b)(8).
F. The Chief of the Aquifer Protection Section, Division of Water Quality, pursuant
to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, has the
authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.

Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
II1. DECISION:
Accordingly, William Dexter Jackson is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$
for violating Condition No. I. 1. of the NPDES Permit
NCA200000 by discharging waste roadside ditch.
for violating Condition No. II.4. of the NPDES Permit
NCA200000 by applying waste such that runoff occurred.
$ TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
$ 587.73 Enforcement costs
$ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have considered
the factors listed in G.S. 143B-282. I (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health,
or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality_ or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date) Theodore L. Bush, Jr., Chief
Aquifer Protection Section
Division of Water Quality

Violator:
Farm Name:
Contact Person:
Address:
Facility #:
Receiving Stream:
Classification:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ANIMAL OPERATIONS
ENFORCEMENT CASE REPORT
Mr. William Dexter Jackson
Dexter Jackson Farm
Mr. William Dexter Jackson
814 Country Club Rd.
Mt. Olive, NC 28365
31-22
NA
NA
Regional Office: Wilmington
Inspector: Chester Cobb
Report Prepared By: Chester Cobb
Case Narrative:
On September 20, 2004, Mr. Chester Cobb received a complaint call of waste runoff from a
sprayfield bordering interstate 40 Connector highway in Duplin County. Farm was identified as
the Dexter Jackson Farm. Upon arrival, Mr. Cobb observed waste being applied to a sprayfield
(see Photo 1). Also, Mr. Cobb observed waste ponding at the field edge (see Photos 8 and 9) and
in the road ditch (see Photos 2, 3, 4, and 5). The waste had to travel several hundred feet from
the land application site to the field edge.
On September 21, 2004, Mr. Cobb went back to the farm to review the records, sprayfield, and
records. When the waste management system operator, Mr. Michael Gilbert, was questioned
about the waste application on September 20,2004, he said that he noticed waste ponding at the
lower field corner upon his second inspection conducted around 4,00 p.m. Mr. Gilbert also
stated that when he noticed the waste at the lower field corner, he increased the speed of the reel
closest to the discharge point from H-1 to H-2. A picture taken of the reel on September 20,
2004 shows that the reel was in the slowest speed setting of L-1 (see Photo 10). The writer
believes that the application rate was in excess of the hydraulic capacity of the soil.
Farm and/or Comnanv Compliance Historv: Include a conv of CAFO Desimation letters
previous NOV's, NOD's previous civil assessments, etc.
September 15, 1997 Notice of Deficiency issued for erosion cuts in lagoon wall.
March 8, 2000 Notice of Deficiency issued for severe erosion cut (> 12" deep) on
inner wall of lagoon D.
_Amount of Waste Discharge (if applicable). If amount cannot be estimated, what is the rate
of flow reaching surface water. TT^
The discharge was estimated to a few hundred gallons to the road ditch.

Sample Results (If applicable) with locations of samples taken noted in relation to the
discharge point:
The approximate location of the water samples is shown in Figure 3. Sample RDl was taken of
the waste ponding in the road ditch (see Photos 2, 3, 4, and 5). Sample FR was taken of waste
ponding at the field edge (see Photos 8 and 9).
Sample Results: September 20, 2004
Sample Point RDI FR
Fecal Conform 290,000 280,000
(colonies/] OOmI)
NO2-N + NO3-N _ 0.85 0.34
NH3-N 146 371
TKN 199 424
(mg/L)
Total P 23.9 69.9
(mg/L)
Violator's degree of cooperation (including efforts to arevent or restore) recalcitrance:
Upon request, the operator did build earthen dams to stop the waste flow from leaving the field.
By the time I arrived on the farm, the irrigation system had been turned off. However, the
Wilmington Regional Office did not receive a written response to the violations listed in the
October 18, 2004 Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement issued for the
discharge. Information was sent as the calibration of the irrigation equipment as requested in the
Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement.
Fish kill observed? YIN If ves, include report from WRC:
No fish kill observed at time of inspection.
Mitigating Circumstances:
No known mitigating circumstances known at time of inspection.
Recommendation:
The Wilmington Regional Office is recommending assessment of civil penalties to the Director
of the Division of Water Quality pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A.
Include a copy of the previously completed Animal Operations Inspection Form, pictures and
site sketch of waste flow if waste is discharged to surface waters. Also include violator's
response to Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement. If citing certified plan or permit
condition violations, include copies of permit or plan.

Assessment Factors required to be considered by G.S. 143B-282.1(b):
1. The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from violation:
The waste was only observed to have entered the road ditch. Neither public health problems
nor damage to private property were documented.
2. The duration and gravity of the violation:
Based on information given by the operator, the discharge probably occurred between 1:05
pm to 5:15 pm on September 20, 2004. Writer believes that only several hundred gallons
made it to the road ditch.
3. The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality:
Water samples were taken from the roadside ditch and at the field edge. Results are
documented under the Sample Results section. The effects on ground water and air quality
were not measured and are therefore unknown.
4. The cost of rectifying the damage:
Unknown.
5. The amount of money saved by noncompliance:
Unknown.
6. Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally:
The writer does not believe that the violation was committed willfully or intentionally.
However, the writer believes that the operator failed to properly apply the waste. From the
land application site, the waste traveled several hundred feet to the field edge where the waste
discharged into the roadside ditch.
7. The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority:
Notice of Deficiency was issued on September 15, 1997 for erosion cuts in lagoon wall.
Notice of Deficiency was issued on March 8, 2000 for severe erosion cut (> 12 inches deep)
on inner wall of lagoon D.
8. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures:
The State's enforcement costs totaled $587.73 as follows:
Staff, Cobb,
10 hours @ $18.31 /hour
$183.10
Pictures
11 @ $0.33 each
$ 3.63
Samples
2 Fecal @ $20.00/sample
$ 40.00
Samples
2 Nutrients @ $115.00/sample
$ 230.00
Mileage
100 miles @ $0.31/mile
$ 31.00
Administrative Costs
$100.00
Total
$ 587.73

f- .. » ,` y •^! �i' •!•.`-.� 1_ cw a0 I � — ut fl.e —' ,� �Q•.i Srai Gs
MU, ival
AIr
j 0,0
J}
-[.ouroads J
OH,
55 '
r
O
llv�'
-V ) `
403
IL
q f � I �t1bt rlv �� m o ,� `- � `:'� '� � E; � ES � z•�
I A
r ° Dads
5Q 1 1 Im �r °a•\-ao a
�' i l. nC G• /
17
N
ll� E
S
Figure 1. The Dexter Jackson Farm, Facility # 31-22, is located West of
Calypso, NC in Duplin County. Farm located off of SR 1302.
Map created from the North Carolina Atlas and Gazetteer, Sixth
Edition.

Figure 2. Aerial photo of Dexter Jackson Farm. Waste runoff occurred
from the sprayfield adjacent to Interstate 40 Connector
highway. Map created from U.S. Geological Survey image of
Calypso, NC obtained through http://terraserver.microsoft.com.

�.
4
A
• may_

�� • a w:J�x�'��[ F i � :Y.«M rr���yy�a�'.r},?�_'r' :g�j;y `r�.l.is " ., ,
LIP
_ -. `i.n 'r . � r` •tip �"La•'tit .� • �.., -�
"'•r^^�' '"e-�- r'.H� •" aj --i
- . -- -y ' :yam �`ta_- d" ._'"•y

MOM

� — � Vie,. _ .-.,.. , � - _-- ,• 1 T
ILA
L ry _T
Vol
s-" .i�S.•K_9. � ^•" � `.led'"-.1
-?tip '..,«' ��•-: f'�!{l
_
�f;
- e±iS',� -•' -

_]�. �'' __ ir? .*�• � _ �s� w' r .a - ' s Y I x' its - .
I i
it 11

l J -�r'� �e'�'pEFs1Y-. - '!
_, � _ w - titer. .�:��a,.. _w.S _ I
t._t�.
_ -., -�{
- � � c � ..
r
' � � � r �'
i

j�

y �
. ��1: 'y ~ �� � ,'� �-�•. ? +fir"-�`._'�,T rv��.��"FFF

�pF WATF9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
WiIIiam G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Cl) North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
[) -r Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division
ision of Water Quality
October 18, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7002 1000 0005 2390 0911
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. William Dexter Jackson
Dexter Jackson Farm
814 Country Club Rd.
Mt. Olive, NC 28365
Subject: Notice of Violation and Recommendation for
Enforcement
Dexter Jackson Farm
Facility Number: 31-22
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Jackson:
This is to notify you of violations to Swine Waste Management System General NPDES Permit
NCA200000 issued on April 9, 2003-under Certificate of Coverage NCA231022.
On September 20, 2004, Mr. Cobb responded to a complaint of waste ponding and running off
into a road ditch along SR1417 (four -lane road that connects Interstate 40 to Bypass 117, north
of Faison, NC). Upon arrival at the location of the complaint, Mr. Cobb observed waste in the
roadside ditch and waste ponding at the edge of a sprayfield adjacent to the road ditch. Once
the sprayfield was identified as of a part the Dexter Jackson Farm, Mr. Cobb conducted an
inspection of the sprayfield. The next day, Mr. Cobb performed a follow up inspection. From
the inspections, the following violations were noted:
1) Discharge of animal waste
On September 20, 2004, Mr. Cobb observed where animal waste had run off a
sprayfield and discharged into a roadside ditch. The discharge to the ditch was
estimated to be a few hundred gallons.
This is in violation Condition No. I. 1. of the NPDES Permit that states in part, "Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface waters or wetlands is prohibited except as
otherwise provided in this permit and associated statutory and regulatory provisions.
Waste shall not reach surface waters or wetlands by runoff, drift, manmade conveyance,
direct application, direct discharge or through ditches not otherwise classified as state
waters..."
NOn
oji hCarolina
,Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Phone [phone] Customer Service
Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington, NC 28405 FAX [phone].623-6748
An Equal OpporiunitylAffirmative Action Employer - 50% RecycledlT% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Jackson
Page 2of4
October 18, 2004
2) Waste ponding and runoff
On September 20, 2004, Mr. Cobb observed where animal waste had been applied to
the field through two traveling gun systems and where waste was running off the land
application area towards the southeast corner of the field. Some of the ponded waste
had run down to the roadside ditch. The majority of the waste runoff appeared to be
coming from the area identified as Pull Q. It appeared that the waste application was too
heavy considering the slopes of the field (see photo 1). Also, it was noticed that the reel
located at Pull Q was set on L-1 position (see photo 2). When Mr. Cobb questioned the
Operator in charge, Mr. Gilbert, the following day, he stated that the reel for Pull Q was
initially set up in the H-1 position and that upon noticing the ponded waste he increased
the speed of the reel by going to the H-2 position. There are some discrepancies
between what was observed on September 20, 2004 and what was stated the following
day..
This is in violation of Condition No. II. 4 of the NPDES Permit that states, "Land
application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the Plant Available Nitrogen rate for the receiving crop. In no
case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff during any
given application event."
In response to this violation, this office must receive the following information within
fifteen (15) working days of the receipt of this notice:
a. A written explanation of the violations.
b. A written description of the actions taken or to be taken to bring the violations back
into compliance and to prevent their recurrence.
c. Information concerning the reels such as the calibration report, ring size used for
applications, and manufacturer's performance charts.
You may wish to contact your County Soil & Water Conservation District Office, County
Extension office, a qualified technical specialist, and/or a professional engineer for any
assistance they may be able to provide.

Mr. Jackson
Page 3 of 4
October 18, 2004
Be advised that this office is considering recommending assessment of civil penalties to
the Director of the Division of Water Quality for the above noted violations. These
violations may.result in civil penalties of up to $25,000 per violation in accordance with
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A(a)(2). You may also be assessed for
reasonable costs of the investigation in accordance with North Carolina General Statute
143-215.3(a)(9). Your response will be forwarded to the Director along with the
enforcement package for his consideration. Be advised that the Division of Water
Quality may take further action in this matter including injunctive relief and permit
revocation.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call Mr. Chester
Cobb at 910-395-3900 ext. 226 or Mr. Steve Lewis at 919-715-6629.
Sin rely,
Chares F. ehman, Ph.D., P.G.
Environmental Regional Supervisor I
cc: Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Glenn Clifton, Prestage Farms
John College, DSWC-WiRO
Keith Larick, APS Central Files
DWQ Wilmington Animal Files 31-22
S:IWQSIANIMALSIDUPLIN12004131-22 NOVRFE

too

0 Division of Water Quality
Q Division'of Soil -and -Water Conservation
O Other Agency - , v .. . - ..
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine (dComplaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
` Facility Number � Date of Visit: 70 Time: li
F
Q Not O erational ' O Below Threshold
Permitted ❑ Certified. ❑ Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operate or Above Threshold:
Farm lame: _... s-��r2.._..._ .._... Cottnt} : - ��f �!'� .............
-- ..__.w ._..._.
Owner Name:�L. Phone No:
Mailing Address:
FaciIit. - Contact: _ ... __._..: _�------ Title: ------ __ Phone No:
Onsite Representative: _ ee�JP-±_ __. _ _ Integrator: _I�
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude
Design Current :. „ De ign : .Current 'Design Current:
awIae : (,a actty t'o tuateon
Wean to Feeder
LZFeeder-to Finish / _7O
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
In Gilts
1-Poultry - . acity Population. Cattle • Ca aci _ Po elation
❑ Layer ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Traver Non -Dairy
Other
Total Design Capacity..
Total SSLW
Number bf Lagoons .
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I _ Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? xYes ❑ No
Discharee originated at: ❑ Lagoon XSpray Field ❑ Other
a_ If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes gNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Statc? (If yes, notify DWQ) [I Yes ZNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in eallmin•?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notif}- DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
3.' Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes �fNo
i- aste Collection & Treatment
i_ Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier. ___ . _ `--___—• _ _ _ __ . _ _ _ _ _ ,_
.recboard (inches):
12112103 Continued

ber: '�j� — elate of lrsgectiori
LhCre a':y 1:i.M_412ie �:.aL :Q the 1?lt� t�' Oi Z;.�' Oi �le St . 4 i'�5 OCSes : e fie a a5, severe'OSIOr:. j i �_ c5 '�O
seepage, etc.)
F.Arlthere st*t ctures or. -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or Ll Yes ❑ do
closmre plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DW Q)
7'. Do any of the structures need maintenance improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any sructures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑Yes
❑ No
elevation markings?
Waste Ap Iication
10. are there any buffers that need maintenanceJimprovement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
ZYes
❑ No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
IS_ Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
I6. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20_ At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ Yes
❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.
nnne_u Commeats {refer to question #) Ezpiain any,YFS xm�vers aad/ar_-any rccamu�etsdabons air say.o ther,co
.Use drawings of hidbt'y tQ better explam s�tubons. {use additia� pages sus necessary) = ❑ Feld Copy ❑ Final Notes x s
— � � f�C� � � z'iJ ,Grp-�ct�rG � � o�? I� ✓ � `
n)DFF o
a)�R f�'%�'3 �2oss�sUs��
o.jC
ReNiewer/Inspector Name57
Reviewer/Iaspector Signature: Date:
12112103 /-...,r:....e.t

umber: / Date o'' Inspecton
uired Records S Document<
_1. Fail to'rave Ce ti*tcate of Coverage General Permit or other Permit .eadil� ayaiiai,le?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22_ Does the facibry fail to have all components of the Cersned Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/' I, P, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
2TNo
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
XYes
Cj No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the -Certified AWN??
❑ Yes
❑ No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3 I _ If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did Lie facility, fail to conduct an annual sludge survev?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections [I Annual Certification Form
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. I
dditioua] Comments arid/or Drawings- .
rX4 Z_c_
F Z_ D{
L
�r OLD
.per P � �-,D ✓ �Etr-� � � �
�- t -
Ct
V': I F_ 0 0 A,
�GL FLI to r-J
S-roo
12112103

Division of SVater Quality : -
iT
O Division of Soil and. Water Conservation
- O Other Agency :
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection Q Operation Reviaw O i mnoon Eva!uation
Reason for Visit O Routine Q Complaint jO Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 2i 0 i-erne:
E Facility Number
0 Not Operational Q Below Threshold
0 Permitted © Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: �.Y f2 -�, fim11 Counts. fC. '!�
0"-ner Name: /d G C .'' ir► / rf � K ii/1 ' Phone No:
Mating address:
Facility- Contact: Title:._ P one No:
Onsite Regresentatiye: Q��2_�/1 rrCf f L �_. Integrator: _ Q�����___^_
Certified Operator: _ .._.__. Operator Certification Number:-------__---_ :
Location of Farm:
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �' �� 0:� Longitude • �0«
Design. Current ` : Design Cent Design 'Current
Swine Ca aci Population - ' Poultry, city Population Cattle Capacitv- Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish -700 '.� 8 `. ❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder Other
Farrow to Finish ToW Design CaP act
I❑ Gilts
$oars = Total SSLW =
Dischar-_es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge orieinaiad at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated floes• in ealhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
I Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Oyes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes Te(No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure ? Structure 5
Identifier:
=reboard (inches): 3/ ji0 "f alo
12112103 Continued

!1 � f
Vie
ber: '�j -- Date of Inspection j � arci' _=eCciatt t 'c to tl'1t i.^.:ems ^ O a .i' of tht S .�_a5 OvSei :�,� Lees. scve:e a Dsion. I j �'-s L f ?�o
seepage. Pl_.)
u, �A,re there SMaZtureS on -site which are not propeny addressed an;,.ier manabed though a waste managemen', or ❑Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notift Dw Q)
7. Do ary of the structures need maintenancefimprovement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other titan waste structures require mai itenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any sructures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes [) No
elevation marlangs?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancefimprovement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN [:]Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAV71%2)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18_ Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Is there anv evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a rem oval ❑Yes ❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments (refer to question #): -Explain any YFS answers andfor any or any other commnents.
Use dra of.& to better J saboatlons.' nse additional as _ ..a _.... _.
� testy., � �� . ]') ❑ Field Cop ❑Final Notes
x
RC-C✓p_fl S. ! 1
2-) .1c
yc-�GJ (ri! (1)6C+(r r:Ej`, ©r= �tILJ 5 f;t�.;� [�F� t✓Ft�+r>a� YL41—L
cc-s? ' r��o-4-r C� LUP,Ll F j E_ ��,o l��A�s o� D=rc►+
Aco"a- . �` p Pu L_c.5 P A 00 0 ARC PLcu_ 0
c (f ly Fr r4_f_� Q �3 6C L
r
E Reviewer/Inspector Name if Q
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:. c/ Date:
I2112/0.3 r....r;....4.i

:umber: v Date o; Inspection
gilireC Records & DocumenLe
Z 1' Fai] to ha%-e Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
L7 Yes
❑ No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(it/ WLTP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
D. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24- Is facility not in compliance u ith any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of desigrt? ❑ Yes
❑ No
25- Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
El Yes
El No
?7. Did Re'viewer/Inspecfor fail to discuss refiewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NTPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NIPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
4. Did the facility fail to'calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35. Does record keening for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate
box below. ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Additional Cortimeats and/orDrawin
=k
r
�` COS 5 IG�:=f urnP=PCr�u�tJT: ©t
A,
[ t{ f R n, n g'- � �1 Q el c.'L-
I491rI
�,[o, UJ
� �' r�� f�zi..9,
C 7 o , i ant c!
6fA5r am bc�
W r �. ,cam
rn� �r CcW� S �r L aon� A .B
G D
o►;,Q.�
�jfr��oc� 33 ' CG
S17 39
- R=C'F_ti F Rfi C� � DF; G �I'��eY �i /'0 it
12/12103

ecilil� \umlwr: of .n;;pk:cti;:n [�
Additional Comments andJur Drdµings:
00�-R TozL I�r CHr�r� �Gt3r2 ���,� t/fn� t F �F+✓ r0�? ucG
/
I-�F_ 1ViJ r4CED LOt--\`S a Pc0c
1 — 2 1 1 1r cam✓ H P, 1
C,v,4 c3 Cv;jp u^-; 1-n A2coNiD
L _ �� PL
lG 1�C� �ri��_�� ►`R� FEU r-:.ry mi -2 �',
1'rLGSW jG Ci�•� C O
oN �ur � rlr� c.,)P%sr
�LpwF p 1 F-rF_C-D EDG( �N� { ti
iC� �LGI�G r
l +
C: o LJC � � o (Rc. �
_

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secret .ry
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural, Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
April 9, 2003
William Dexter Jackson
Dexter Jackson Farm
814 Country Club Rd
Mt. Olive NC 28365
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No: NCA231022
Dexter Jackson Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin County
Dear William Dexter Jackson:
On March 14, 2003, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division), issued an NPDES General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued to enable swine facilities in North Carolina to
obtain coverage under a single permit that addresses both State and Federal requirements.
In accordance with your application received on January 14, 2003, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to William Dexter Jackson, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with NPDES
General Permit NCA200000. The issuance of this COC supercedes and terminates your COC Number
AWS310022 to operate under State Non -Discharge Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Dexter Jackson Farm, located in DuplinCounty, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 14700 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to land as specified
in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA ArMP). if this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow taFeeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC'shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 1, 2007. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COG An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CA vN1MP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed General Permit. Since this is a new joint State and
Federal general permit it contains many new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained
in the current State general permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit. The Devices to Automatically Stop Irrigation Events Form
must be returned to the Division of Water Quality no later than 1.20 days following receipt of the
Certificate of Coverage. The Animal Facility Annual Certification Form must be coMRIeted and returned
to the Division of Water Quality y no later than March 1st of each year.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
A
NaE—NR
Internet http://h2o.enr.state,nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

If vour Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Pem- ittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C, the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 122.41 including civil penalties, criminal
penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity pernvtted under the General Permit after the expiration date -of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an. individual NPDES Permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility. is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sincerely,
v
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit NCA200000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
DupIin County Health Department
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File NCA231022
Permit File AWS310022
NDPU Files

�iF4•�4 L .a?p - fit_
envirochem:
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
6602 Windmill Way • Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone] (Lab) • [phone] (Fax)
710 Bow-sertown Road = ;`"ante°, raC 2795'I
[phone]
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING
CHEMISTS NCDFNR: DWQ CERTIFICATE #94. DLS CERTIFICATE #37729
Customer:
NCDENR-DWQ
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Attn: Chester Cobb
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Date Sampled: 09/20/04
Sampled By: Chester Cobb
Stream -
Date of Report: October 5, 2004
Purchase Order #:
Report Number: 4-6140
Report To: Chester Cobb
PARAMETER
Sample ID
RD1
FR
Date
Analyzed
Lab ID
# 13284
# 13285
Nitrate + Nitrite Nitrogen, NO3+NOz-N mg/L
0.85
0.34
09/22/04
Ammonia, NH3-N mg/L
146
371
09/29/04
Total Phosphorus, P mg/L
23.9
69.9
09/24/04
Total K,jeldahl Nitrogen, TKN mg/L
199
424
09/28/04
Fecal Coliform, colonies1100 mL
290,000
280,000
09/20/04
Comments:
Reviewer

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC
NCDENH: DWQ CertiReate #94, DIA CertiBeate 437729
Sample Collection and Chain of Custody
Analytical & Consulting Chemists
Cflmnla 'T'vnn. 7 . 'F-n..0.., Ti -• ii m..--+ vu -xv-it c'i`en -e-n ci - Cl..A-- [l♦I.s...
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
r'...,:AI• rie�ianrot'el4irir,�nl rn.n-
Sample
Identification
Collection
a
rn
o
o
:?,
v
°°o
:1
o a
ca "'
a
0 9
3
U
PRESERVATION
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
Z
O
U
�
d
�
O
�
0
DATE
TIME
TEMP
C
G
�35
C
P
G
G
C
P
G
G
C
P
G
G
C
P
G
G
C
P
G.
G
C
P
G
G
C
P
G
G
C
P
G
G
Transfer
Relinquished By:
Date/Time
Received by:
Date/Time
1.
2.
Temperature wh ece' : Accepted:_ i Rejected: Resample Requested:
Delivered By: Received By: a e: g- ZJ- Time:r-
Comments: a c
i

EWPORTANr NOTICE
North. Carolina Division of water Quality (NCDWQ) is strictly enforcing EPA regulations for sample collection and
preser atim
Client Must Provide the Fallowing Information
2. SAMPLE IDENTIFICAT'IQN (Container Associated with requested testing)
2. SAMPLE._TYPE (Composite, Grab, Water, Soil, etc.)
3. DATE -CO
4. TWE COLLECTED
5. SAMPLE COLLECTOR
6. PRESERVATION (Includmg Temperature and pH)
Temyemture: Samples MUST be refrigerated or received on ice between 2 and 6 " G Samples received
within.two (2) hours of collection must show a downward trend Therefore, please record temperataie at
collection in space provided on collection sheet.
• H: A two (2)-hour hrnit to chemically preserve samples by pH adjustment is allowed, except for metals
samples reported to the Groundwater Section which roust be acidified at the time 'of collection.
Caution
These sample bottles may contain small amounts of acid or other corrosive And potentially harmful
chemicals. Laboratories are required to add these chemicals for certain analy31 in order to comply
with EPA preservation requirements. Use extreme care when openiaug and ladling the battles. If
any chemical should get on your side or clothes flush liberally with water and seek medical attention.
DECHLORINATxON INSTRUCTXONS
CAUTION: DO NOT Mix thiosulfate with acid in bottle before collecting samples as a
violent reaction will occur.
Dedi orinu ' Samples &at R utire Acid Preservation
D _ Add 4-5 granules of thiosulfate to a bottle with no acid preservative (unpreserved BOD/TSS bottle).
2. After nubdng to dissolve the thiosulfate, pour half of the sample into a bottle containing acid as a
Preservative (Amrmonia/TICN).
3. Then completely fill boor bottles with fresh sample.:"
The Laboratory will verify and document the above requested imformadori
are£ NCAC 21-LO805 (a) CI) (Ml_
At any. time a laboratory receives samples which do not meet sample colccdon, holding time, or preservation
requirements, the laboratory must notify the sample collector or client and secure another sample if possible. If another
,sample cannot be secured; the original sample maybe analyzed., bm the n uutts reported crust be auaMed with the nature
of the mfracd*s). And the laboratory must notify the State Laboratory about the k&m=fion(s). Tire natifreation must
include a statement indicating corrective actions taken to prevent the problem for futmne samples.
ref NCAC ZRO805 "

s
4
Prestage Farms, Inc.
Irrigation Equipment Field Calibration Form
t._.
Farm Name:
Date of Field Calibration: l `I
Flow Meter Serial Number: lu`O,"to 12 ,S'
Equipment Number:
Measured ring size: _ ` a = inches
Is ring size within 0.01" of original manufactured size?
Yes or No. 1f not, replace ring.
Pressure Gauge Readings At Pump: 1 psi
At Traveler:
At SprinkerlGun: psi
a
Expected Flow Rate (from manufactures chart): 1' GPM
Measured Flow Rate (from flow meter): -, (.z GPM
Flow rate variance greater than 1001
Yes No Y'
Y
0CT 2 3 2004 i
i
Expected Wetted Diameter (from the wettable acres determination):
Measured Wetted Diameter:?
"Ietted diameter variance greater than 15% &tor measured flow variance greater than .
10%.- Yes No _ 1f yes, then contact a technical specialist or irrigation dealer
for assistance.
Comments:
Calibrator: _—r
.-f (signature)
Inigation Equipment Field Calibiailion Form 511/03
I

ENGINE SPEED SETTINGS FOR THE
C1030 IRRIGATOR
� k�SPEEQ�GEAR��=RANGE, �E,NiGlNE
k
1.00
1
LOW
2430
1.25
1
LOW
3040
1,50,
2
LOW
2160
1.75
2
LOW
2520
2.00
2
LOW
2880
2.25
2
LOW
3240
2.50
2
LOW
3600
2.75
1
HIGH
2710
3.00
1
HIGH
2960
3.25
1
HIGH
3200
3.50
3
LOW
2640
3.75
3
LOW
2830
4.00
3
LOW
3020
4 4.25
2
HIGH
2480
4.50
2
HIGH
2630
4.75
2
HIGH
2770
SPEED ��GEAR� �RAfVGE ENGINE
5.00
2
HIGH
2920
5.50
2
HIGH
3210
6.00
2
HIGH
3500
6.50
3
HIGH
1990
7.00
3
HIGH
2140
7.50
3
HIGH
2290
8.00
3
HIGH
2440
8.50
3
HIGH
2600
9,00
3
HIGH
2750
9.50
3
HIGH
2900
10.00
3
HIGH
3050
10.50
3
HIGH
3210
11.00
3
HIGH
3360
11.50
3
HIGH
3510
12.00
3
HIGH
3660
4

Y'r
GROSS APPLICATION DEPTH VS. GROUND SPEED
MODEL C1030 Wl NELSON SR150-24 GUN & RING NOZZLES
0.86
60
50
100
170
e_8
4.4
2.9
2.2
1.8
1.5
1.3
11
1.0
0,9
70
58
108
180
9.0
45
3.0
2.2
1.8
1.5
1 3
1.1
1'0
0.9
80
66
116
190
9.1
4,5
3 0
2.3
1 8
1.5
1.3
1.1
1.0
0.9
90
75
124
190
9.7
49
3.2
2.4
1 9
1.6
1,4
1.2
1.1
1,0
100
83
130
200
97
48
3.2
2.4
1.9
1.6
1,4
1.2
1.1
1.0
110
92
137
200
10,1
5 1
3 4
2 5
2.0
1.7
1.4
1,3
1.1
1,0
097
70
53
132
190
10.4
52
3 5
26
2.1
1.7
1.5
1.3
1.2
1.0
80
60
143
200
106
5,3
3.5
2.7
2 1
1.8
1.5
1 3
1.2
1.1
90
68
151
200
11 2
5 6
3.7
2 8
2.2
1 9
1,6
1 4
1 2
1 1
100
75
160
210
11.3
5,6
38
2,8
2.3
1.9
1.6
1.4
1.3
11
110
83
168
210
11,8
59
3.9
3.0
24
2.0
17
1,5
13
1.2
120
91
176
220
11 8
5,9
3.9
2.9
2 4
2.0
1,7
1.5
1 3
1 2
1 08
30
53
165
200
12,5
6 2
4 2
3 1
2.5
2 1
1.8
1 6
1.4
1 2
90
59
180
210
127
6.3
42
3,2
2,5
2.1
18
1.6
1.4
13
100
66
191
210
134
6,7
4.5
34
27
2.2
19
17
15
1.3
110
73
20C
220
134
6,7
4.5
3 3
2.7
2 2
1 9
1.7
1.5
1 3
120
79
210
220
14,1
7,0
4.7
3 5
2 8
2.3
2.0
1 8
1 6
1 4
130
86
218
230
139
6.9
4.6
3 5
2.8
2.3
2 0
1.7
15
1 4
140
93
227
230
14.5
7 2
4 8
3 5
2 9
2 A
2.1
1 8
1.6
1 4
1 18
90
51
206
210
145
72
48
3.6
29
2.4
2.1
1.8
16
14
100
56
218
220
146
73
49
36
2.9
2.4
2.1
1B
16
15
110
62
229
220
15,3
7 7
5,1
3 8
3.1
2.5
2 2
1,9
1 7
1 5
120
68
240
230
15.3
7 7
5 1
3 8
34
2.6
2.2
1.9
1.7
1 5
130
74
250
230
15.9
8.0
53
4.0
3 2
2 7
2.3
20
1 8
1 6
14C
80
260
240
15.8
7 9
5.3
4 0
3 2
26
2.3
2,0
1 8
1 6
150
86
269
240
16 4
8.2
55
4 1
3 3
2 7
23
2,0
1 6
1 6
1,26
110
51
257
230
16,4
8.2
5 5
4 1
3.3
2.7
2,3
20
1 8
1.6
120
56
267
230
17.0
8.5
5.7
4 3
3 4
2.6
2.4
2.1
t9
1.7
130
62
278
24C
159
85
56
4,2
3 4
2,8
24
2 1
1.9
1 7
140
67
287
240
17 5
87
5.8
4 4
3 5
2.9
2 5
2.2
1 9
1.7
150
72
299
250
17.4
87
5.8
4.4
3 5
2,9
2.5
2.2
19
1 7
1 34
130
50
302
230
19 3
96
6 4
4 8
3 9
3 2
2,8
2 4
2.1
1 9
140
55
312
240
190
95
63
48
3.8
32
27
2.4
21
1.9
150
58
327
240
199
100
66
50
40
33
2.8
2.5
22
20
A

AVERA.C-E APPLICATION RATE DATA FOR NELSON SR150 GUN @ 24 DEGREES
FOR VARIOUS RING SIZES, PRESSURES AND ARCS OF THROW
BASED ON PUBLISHED PERFORMANCE DATA FROM NELSON IRRIGATION
FilNc3 C�i}fiT '_';
OPM
DI,?METi=R
0.86
50
100
245
60
110
260
70
120
270
80
128
280
90
135
290
100
143
300
110
150
310
120
157
315
0.97
50
130
265
60
143
280
70
155
290
80
165
300
90
175
310
100
185
320
110
195
330
120
204
335
1.08
50
165
285
60
182
300
70
197
310
80
210
320
90
223
330
100
235
340
110
247
350
120
258
360
1.18
50
205
300
60
225
315
70
245
330
80
260
340
90
275
350
100
290
360
110
305
370
12D
320
380
1.26
50
255
320
60
275
335
70
295
350
80
315
360
90
335
370
100
355
380
110
370
390
120
385
400
1.34
50
300
335
60
330
350
70
355
365
80
380
380
90
405
390
100
425
400
110
445
410
120
465
420
1.41
50
350
350
60
385
365
70
415
380
80
445
395
90
475
405
100
500
415
110
525
425
120
545
435
360 33Q 360- 270 240 "I'21Q 184 180 120
ARG` ARC. ARC ARC ARC r.>ARC ARG„ „ARsO ' ARG
0.25
0.28
0.30
0.34
0.38
0.43
0.50
0-61
0.76
0.25
0.27
0-30
0-33
0.37
0.42
0.49
0.59
0 74
0-25
0.27
0,30
0.31
0.37
0.43
0.50
0.60
0.75
0.25
0.27
0.30
0.33
0-37
0,42
0,49
059
034
&24
027
0.29
0-32
0.36
0.42
0.49
0.58
0.73
0.24
126
0.29
0.32
0-36
0 41
0.48
0.58
0-72
0.24
0.26
0.28
0.32
0.35
0,41
0-47
0.57
0.71
024
026
029
0,32
0.36
0.41
0.48
0.57
0.72
0.28
0,31
0.34
0.37
042
0.46
0.56
0.67
0-84
0.25
0.30
0.33
0-37
0-41
0.47
0.55
0.66
0 83
0.28
D 30
0.33
0.37
0.42
0.48
0.56
0.67
0.84
0.28
0.30
D.33
0.37
0.42
0.48
056
0.67
0.53
0.28
030
0.33
0.37
0-41
0.47
0.55
0.66
083
0.27
0.30
0.33
0,36
0.41
0.47
0.55
0.66
0.82
0.27
030
0.33
0-36
0.41
0.46
0.54
0-65
0,61
0.28
0.30
0.33
0.37
.0.41
0.47
0.55
0.66
0.53
0-31
0-34
0,37
0.41
0.46
0.53
0.62
0.74
0-92
0.31
0.33
0.37
0.41
0.46
0.52
0.61
0.73
0.92
0.31
0-34
0-37
0.41
0.47
0.53
0.62
074
0,93
0.31
0.34
0,37
0.41
0.47
0-53
0.62
0.75
0.93
031
0.34
0.37
0.41
0.46
0.53
0.62
0-74
0.93
0.31
0.34
0,37
0.41
0.46
0-53
0.67
0.74
0.92
0.31
033
0-37
0.41
0.46
0.52
0.61
0.73
0.92
0-30
0.33
0,36
0.40
0.45
0.52
0.60
0,72
0-90
9
0.34
0.38
0.41
0.46
0.52
0.59
0.69
0.83
1.03
0.34
0.37
0-41
046
051
0-59
069
0.82
1.03
0.34
0.37
0.41
0.45
0.51
0.58
0.68
0,82
102
0.34
0.37
0-41
0-45
051
058
0.68
0.82
1.02
0.34
0.37
041
0-45
051
0-58
0-68
0,82
1.02
0.34
0.37
0.41
0.45
0.51
D.58
0.68
0.81
1-02
0.34
0.37
0.40
0.45
0.51
0.58
0.67
0-81
1.01
0.34
0.37
0.40
045
0.50
0.58
0-67
0.81
1.01
038
041
0.45
0,50
0,57
0.65
0,75
0-90
1.13
0.37
0.40
0.45
0.49
056
064
0.74
0.89
1.11
0.36
0.40
0.44
0.49
0.55
0,62
0.73
0.87
1.09
0.37
0.40
0.44
0-49
055
063
0.74
0.88
1 10
037
0-40
0.44
0.49
0.56
0.54
0.74
0.89
1.11
0.37
0.41
0-45
050
0.56
0-64
0.74
0.89
1 12
0.37
0.40
0.44
0.49
0.55
0.63
0.74
0-53
1-10
036
0.40
0.44
0.49
0.55
0.62
0.73
087
1.09
0.40
0.44
0.49
0.54
0.61
0.69
0.81
0.97
121
0-41
0.44
0.49
0.54
0.61
0,70
0.82
0.98
1-22
0.40
0.44
0.48
0-54
0.61
0.69
081
0.97
1.21
0-40
0,43
DAB
0.53
0.60
0.68
0,80
0.96
1.20
0.40
0.44
0,48
0.54
0.60
0-69
0.81
0.97
1.21
0 40
0-44
0.43
0.5?'4
0.60
0,69
0-80
0.97
1,71
0.40
0.44
0,48
0.53
0.60
0-69
0.80
0.96
1.20
0.40
0-44
0-43
053
0-60
0,68
080
0.96
120
0.43 _
0.47
0.52
0.58
0.65
0.74
0.87
1,04
1 30
0-44
0.48
0.52
0,58
0,66
0.75
0.87
1.05
1-31
0.44
0-47
0,52
058
0.65
0.75
0.87
1.04
1.31
0,43
0.47
052
058
0-65
074
0.86
1.04
1.30
0.44
0.48
0.53
0.58
0,66
0.75
0.88
1.05
1.32
0,44
0.48
0.53
0.59
0.66
0.75
0.88
1.05
1-32
0-44
048
0.53
0,59
0-66
0.75
0-88
1.06
1 32
0-44
0-48
0.52
0-58
065
0,75
0-87
1.05
1.31

Prestage Farms, Inc.
4
Irrigation Equipment Field Calibration Form "
- s• �-I �' - r i
Fan-n Name: J k, -i-y c OCT 2 S 2004
f
Date of Field Calibration:
i
Flow Meter Serial Number: f'Tl,-,:, 0 t -) 1
Equipment Number: r t-- (? ' W
Measured ring size: .'-'!__ I inches
Is ring size within 0.01" of original manufactured size?
' Yes or No. If not, replace ring.
Pressure Gauge Readings At Pump: i - psi
At Traveler: psi
At SpfinkerlGun: = `spsi
Expected Flow Rate (from manufactures chart): i GPM
Measured Flow Rate (from flow meter): GPM
Flow rate variance greater than 1017o
Yes No
Expected Wetted Diameter (from the wettable acres determination): ft.
Measured Wetted Diameter =_ ` J : ft.
Wetted diameter variance greater than 15% &-/or measured flow variance -greater than
10%: Yes No / 1f yes, then contact a technical specialist or irrigation dealer
for assistance.
Comments:
Calibrator:
(signasure)
Irrigation Equipment field Calibration form
5!! 103

ENGINE SPEED SETTINGS FOR THE
B1025 IRIGATOR
1.00
1
OUTER
2290
5.00
2
MIDDLE
3600
1.25
1
OUTER
2860
5.50
2
INNER
2230
1.50
1
OUTER
3430
6.00
2
INNER
2440
1.75
1
MIDDLE
2130
6.50
2
INNER
2640
2.00
1
MIDDLE
2430
7.00
2
INNER
2840
2.25
1
MIDDLE
2740
7.50
2
INNER
3050
2.50
1
MIDDLE
3040
8.00
2
INNER
3250
2.75
1
MIDDLE
3340
8.50
2
INNER
3450
3.00
2,
MIDDLE
2160
9.00
2
INNER
3660
3.25
2
MIDDLE
2340
9.50
3
MIDDLE
1880
3.50
2
MIDDLE
2520
10.00
3
MIDDLE
1980
3.75
2
MIDDLE
2700
11.00
3
MIDDLE
2180
4.00
2
MIDDLE
2880
12.00
3
MIDDLE
2380
4.25
2
MIDDLE
3060
13.00
3
MIDDLE
2580
4.50
2
MIDDLE
3240
14.00
3
MIDDLE
2780
4.75
2
MIDDLE
3420
15.00
3
MIDDLE
2970

GROSS APPLICATION DEPTH VS. GROUND SPEED
MODEL B1030 Wl NELSON SR150-24 GUN & RING NOZZLES
RING
SIZE
ELBOW
PRESSURE
GUN
PRESSURE
GALLONS PER
MINUTE
RECOMMENDED
LANE SPACING
APPLICATION DEPTH IN INCHES VS. GROUND SPEED IN FEET PER MINUTE
0.1 1
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.75
0.8
0,9.
1,0
086
60
52
102
110
88
44
3.5
2.9
2.2
1.8
1.5
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
70
61
ill
180
9.0
4,5
36
30
2.2
1.6
1.5
1.3
1.2
1,1
1,0
09
80
69
119
190
9,1
4, 5
3.6
30
2.3
1.8
1.5
1.3
1.2
1 1
1 G
0.9
90
78
125
190
9,6
48
3,9
32
2.4
1.9
1,6
1.4
1,3
1.2
1.1
1.0
1({)
87
133
200
96
4.8
3,8
32
2.4
1.9
1 6
1.4
1 3
1.2
1 1
le
110
96
140
210
96
4,8
3.8
3,2
24
1,9
1.6
14
1.3
12
1.1
1D
097
70
57
135
19D
10.3
5.1
4.1
3.4
26
2.1
1,7
1 5 1
1,4
1.3
11
1.0
80 '
64
146
200
10.7
5.3
43
36
27
2 1
1,6
1.5
1,4
1.3
1,2
1.1
90
72
157
200
113
5 7
4,5
38
2,8
2.3
1.9
1 6
15
1.4
1 3
1 1
100
80
166
21C
11.3
5.7
45
3.8
28
23
1.9
1.6
15
14
13
1,1
110
89
174
220
11.3
56
4.5
3 8
2.6
2.3
1,9
1 6
1 5
1 4
1 3
1.1
120
97
182
220
11.8
59
4 7
3,9
30
2 4
20
1 7
1 6
15
1 3
1.2
1 08
70
50
167
200
12.0
6,0
4 8
40
3.0
2.4
20
1 1
1 6
1.5
1 3
1.2
80
58
179
210
12 2
6.1
4 9
4.1
3.1
2 4
2.0
1.7
1.6
1.5
1 4
1,Z
90
65
190
210
130
6,5
52
43
32
28
2.2
1.9
17
16
14
1,3
100
72
200
220
13.0
G 5
5,2
4,3
3.2
2 6
22
1.9
1.7
1 6
1 4
1.3
110
80
211)
220
13.6
68
5,5
4,5
34
2,7
2.3
1,9
18
17
1,5
14
120
61
219
230
13.5
6.8
5.4
4 5
34
2.7
2. 3
1,9
1.8
1 7
1 5
1 4
130
94
229
230
14.1
7.1
5.7
4.7
35
2 8
2 4
2.0
1.9
1 8
1 6
1 4
1.18
80
51
207
210
14. 1
7.1
5 7
4 7
3.5
2.8
24
2.0
19
1,8
1,6
1A
90
57
219
226
14.2
7,1
57
4,7
3.6
28
2.4
20
1,9
1.8
16
1.4
100
63
233
220
7.6
6.0
50
3.8
3.0
25
2.2
2,0
1.9
1 7
1 5
110
70
245
230
7,6
61
50
38
3.0
2.5
2.2
2,0
1.9
1.7
15
120
77
256
240
75
6.0
50
38
30
25
22
20
19
17
1.5
130
83
266
240
TS
6.3
52
3,9
3 1
2.6
22
2 1
2 0
1.7
16
140
90
275
250
7.7
6.2
52
3.9
3.1
2.6
22
2.1
1 9
1.7
1.5
150
97
28fi
250
1 80
1 6.4
54
40
3.2
27
23
2.1
20
1.8
16
1.26
100
54 263
230
8.1
65
5,4
4.1
3.2
2.7
2.3
2.2
2,0
1.8
1 6
110
60
275
230
8
68
5,7
4,2
3,4
7.8
24
2a3
2,1
1 9
1.7
120
66
287
240
8.5
6,8
56
4 2
3 4
28
2.4
2.3
2,1
1,9
1 7
13D
72
299
250
84
67
56
4.2
34
28
24
2.2
21
1,9
17
140
77
311
250
88
70
5,8
4.4
35
2.9
25
2,3
22
19
1.8
150
83
323
250
9.1
7.3
61
4,5
3,6
3 0
2.6
2.4
2 3
2 0
1 6
1 34
110
50
303
240
8.9
7 1
60 4.5
3.6
3 6
26
2 4
2.2
2 0
1,8
120
55
318
240
9,4
7.5
6 2 4.7
3.7
3 1
2.7
2 5
2 3
2.1
1,9
130
60
330
250
9 3
7.4
62 46
3 7
3.1
2.7
2 5
1 2.3
2 1
1 9
140
65
343
250
9 6
7.7
6 4 4.8
3.9
3,2
2.8
26
24
2 1
1 9
150
70
355
250
9,6
7.6
6.4 4.8
38
3,2
2.7
2.5
2.4
2.1
1.9
1.41
130
51
354
250
9.9
8.0
6 6
5.0
4.0
3.3
2.8
2.7
2,5
2.2 2 0
140
55
368
250
10.3
8.3
6 9
5,2
4,1
34
2 0
2.8
2-6
2.3 2.1
150
59
382
250
10.7
8.6
7.2
1 5.4
1 4.3
3.6
31
2.9
2.7
2 4 2.1

0
AVERAGE APPLICATION RATE DATA FOR NELSON SR150 GUN @ 24 DEGREES
FOR VARIOUS RING SIZES, PRESSURES AND ARCS OF THROW
BASED ON PUBLISHED PERFORMANCE DATA FROM NELSON IRRIGATION
0
RENG GUN D]AMETEFt
36Q
� 330 � � 300
�770 �� ��240 210 ' y 180 150��' 120 `s
SfZE pRJ~SSl1RE 4
4
ARC
ARC„w` ARC
ARC
ARC ARC ARCr
ARCAkARC
.,-.
0.56
50
100
245
0.25
0.28
0.30
0.34
0.38
0.43
0.50
0.61
0.76
60
110
260
0.25
0.27
0.30
0.33
0.37
0.42
0.49
0.59
0.74
70
120
270
0.25
0.27
0.30
0.33
0,37
043
0.50
0.60
0.75
80
128
250
0.25
0.27
0.30
0.33
0.37
0.42
0.49
0.59
0.74
90
135
290
0.24
0,27
0.29
0.32
0.36
0.42
0.49
0.58
0,73
100
143
300
0.24
0.26
0.29
0.32
0.36
0.41
0.48
0.58
0.72
110
150
310
0.24
0.26
0-28
0.32;
0.35
0.41
0.47
0.57
0.71
120
157
315
0.24
0.26
0.29
0.32
0.36
0,41
0.48
0.57
0.72
0.97
50
130
265
0.28
0.31
0.34
0.37
0.42
0.48
0.56
0.67
0.84
60
143
280
0.28
0.30
0.33
0.37
0.41
0.47
0.55
0.66
0.83
70
155
290
0.28
0.30
0.33
0.37
0.42
0.48
0.56
0.67
0.84
80
165
300
0.28
0.30
0.33
0.37
0.42
0.48
0.56
0.67
0.83
90-
175
310
0.25
0-30
0.33
0.37
0.41
0.47
0.55
0.66
0.83
100
185
320
0.27
0.30
0.33
0.36
0.41
0.47
0.55
0.66
0.82
110
195
330
0.27
0,30
0.33
0.36
0.41
0.46
0.54
0.65
0.81
120
204
335
0.28
0.30
0.33
0.37
0,41
0.47
0.55
0.66
0.83
1.08
50
165
285
0.31
0.34
0.37
0-41
0.46
0.53
0.62
0.74
C.92
60
182
300
0.31
0.33
0.37
0.41
0.46
0.52
0.61
0.73
0.92
70
197
310
0.31
0.34
0.37
0.41
0.47
0.53
0.62
0.74
0.93
80
210
320
0.31
0,34
0.37
0.41
0.47
0.53
0.62
0.75
0.93
90
223
330
0.31
0,34
0.37
0.41
0.46
0.53
0.62
0.74
0.93
100
235
340
0.31
0.34
0.37
0.41
0.46
0.53
0.62
0.74
0.92
110
247
350
0.31
0.33
0.37
0.41
0.46
0.52
0.61
033
0.92
120
258
360
0.30
0.33
0.36
0.40
0.45
0.52
0,60
0.72
0.90
1.18
50
205
300
0-34
0.38
0.41
0.46
0.52
0.59
0.69
0.83
1.03
60
225
315
0.34
0,37
0.41
0-46
0.51
0.59
0.69
0.82
1.03
70
245
330
0.34
0.37
0.41
0.45
0.51
0.58
0.63
0.82
1.02
80
260
340
0.34
0.37
0,41
0.45
0.51
0.58
0.68
0,82
1.02
90
275
350
0.34
0.37
0.41
0.45
0.51
0.56
0.68
0.52
1.02
100
290
360
0.34
0.37
0.41
0.45
0.51
0.58
0.68
0.81
1.02
110
305
370
0.34
0.37
0.40
0.45 Q
0.51
0.58
0.67
0.81
1.01
120
320
380
0.34
0.37
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.58
0.67
0-51
1.01
1.26
50
255
320
0.38
0.41
0,45
0.50
0.57
0.65
0.75
0.90
1,13
60
275
335
0.37
0.40
0.45
0,49
056
0.64
0.74
0.89
1.11
70
295
350
0-36
0.40
0.44
0.49
0.55
0.62
0.73
0-57
1.09
80
315
360
0.37
0.40
0.44
0.49
0.55
0.63
0,74
0.88
1.10
90
335
370
037
0.40
0.44
0.49
0.56
0.64
0.74
0,89
1.11
100
355
380
0.37
0.41
0.45
0.50
0.56
0.64
0.74
0.89
1.12
110
370
390
0,37
0.40
0.44
0.49
0.55
063
0.74
0.88
1.10
120
385
400
0.36
0.40
0-44
0.49
0.55
0.62
0.73
0.37
1.09
1.34
50
300
335
0,40
0.44
0.49
0,54
0.61
0.69
0.81
0.97
1.21
60
330
350
0.41
0.44
0.49
0.54
0.61
0.70
0,52
0.98
1.22
70
355
365
0A0
0.44
0.48
0.54
0.61
0.69
0.81
0.97
1.21
80
380
380
0.40
0.43
0.48
0.53
0.60
0.68
0.50
0.96
1.20
90
405
390
0.40
0.44
0.48
0.54
0.60
0.69
0.81
0.97
1.21
`
100
425
400
0,40
0.44
0.48
0.54
0_60
0.69
0.80
0.97
1.21
110
445
410
0.40
0.44
0.48
0.53
0.60
0.69
0.80
0.96
1.20
120
465
420
0.40
0.44
0.48
0.53
0.60
0.68
0.80
0.96
1.20
1.41
50
350
350
0.43
0.47
0.52
0.58
0,65
0.74
0.87
1.04
1.30
60
385
365
0.44
0A8
0.52
0.58
0.66
0.75
0.87
1.05
1.31
70
415
380
0.44
0.47
0.52
0.58
0.65
0.75
0.87
1.04
1,31
80
445
395
0.43
0.47
0.52
0.58 4•
0.65
0.74
0.86
1.04
1.30
90
475
405
0.44
0.48
0.53
0.58
0.66
0.75
0.88
1.05
1.32
100
500
415
0.44
0.48
0,53
0.59
0.66
0,75
0.88
1.05
1.32
110
525
425
0.44
0.48
0.53
0.59
0,66
0.75
0.58
1.06
1.32
120
545
435
0.44
0.48
0.52
0.58
0.65
0:75
0.87
1.05
1.31

r.0
Xter Ja ckaon 1-20 Page 2
plent analysis made, which could allow additibnel waste to be applied. Provi&iona &hall be made for the area receiving waste to
ff be flexible so ea to accommodate changing waste analysis content
and the crop types Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the
optimum rang6 for specific crop production.
This waste utili2ation plan, if carried out, meets the
requirements fqr compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the
Environmental Management Commiasion.
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract
Pull Soil Crop
Yield
Lba. N
-Acres
Lba. N
Month to
No.
No. Type Code
/Acre
/Unit
Used
Apply
73
A-E2 OrB C
6.3
50.00
17.1
5380
APR-SEP
73
A-E2 OrB L
N/A
50.00
* 17.1
854
SEP-MAY
70
F-N NoA D
110
1.07
25.0
2938
MAR_JUN
70
F-N NoA W
60
2.07
* 25.0
3100
SEP-APR
70
F-N NoA Z
33
4.00
25.0
3295
JUN-AUG
87
O-V OrB D
120
1.08
14.6
1897
MAR JUN
87
O-V OrB W
55
2.04
* 14.6
1643
SEP_APR
87
O-V OrB Z
38
4.00
14.6
2225
JUN-AUGn
86
W-CC NoA D
110
1.07
17.4
2052
MAR_JUN
86
W-CC NoA W
60
2.07
* 17.4
2165
SEp-APR
86
W-CC NoA Z
33
4.00
17.4
2301
JUN-AUG
86
DD-GG LyB D
115
1.08
6.8
845
MAR JUN
86
DD-GG LyB W
60
2.07
* 6.8
845
SEP-APR
86
DD-GG LyB Z
38
4.00
6.8
1034
JUN-AUG
86
HH-PP NoA D
110
1.07
17.5
2060
MAR JUN
86
HH-PP NoA W
60
2.07
* 17.5
2174
SEP-APR
86
HH-PP NoA Z
33
4.00
17.5
2310
JUN-AUG
Total
179.7
- 37115
Available Nitrogen
(includes commercial)
33810
Surplus Or
Deficit
-3305
Crop codes: Crop -unit
A=Barley-bu.
I=Oats-bu.
B=Bermudegraae(graze)-tons
J=Rye-bu.
C=Bermudagraas(hay)-tong
K=Small
grain(graze)-acre
D=Corn(grain)-bu.
L=Small
grain(hey)-acre
E-Corn(ailage)-tans
M=Sorghum(grain)-cwt.
F=Cotton-lbs. lint
W=Wheat-bu.
G=Feacue(graze)-tons
Y=Fescue(pasture)-tone
H=Fescue(hay)-tons
Z=SBDC
Soybeans
DC-bu.
Applying
the above amount of
waste.in
a big
job.
You should plan;
time and
have appropriate equipment
to apply
the
waste in a timely
manner.
:r.

er-,Jackson 1-20 Page 4
IppPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
igation application rate should not exceed the intake rate
.� Qf:tha soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding
occurs. This rate'la limited by initial soil moisture content,,
soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic
solids. The application amount should not exceed the available
water holding cjapacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor
ahould the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen
needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this
plan, it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation
designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to
properly irrigate the acres shown in tables. Failure to apply the.
recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the table may
make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing
application rates and amounts.
Rr k-%. .
Tract
.Fe�
Soil
Crop
Applic
Applic
IRR-2
No.
No.'
Type
Rate
Amount
PAN
(in/hr)
(in(a))
LBS/AC
73
A-E2
OrB
C
0.5
1
315
73
A-E2
OrB
L
0.5
1
50
70
F--N
NoA
D
0.5
1
117.7
70
F-N
NoA
W
0.5
1
124.2
70
F-N
NoA
2
0.4
1
132
87
O-V
Ora
D
0.4
1
124.6
87
O-V
OrB
W
0.4
1
112.2
87
O-V
Ora
2
0.4
1
152
86
W-CC
NoA
D
0.4
1
117.7
86
W-CC
NoA
W
0.4
1
124.2
86
W-CC
NoA
2
0.4
132
86
DD-GG.
LyB
D
0.4
1
124.2
86
DD-GG
LyB
W
0.4
1
124.2
86
DD-GG
LyB
2
0.4
1
152
86
HH-PP
NoA
D
0.4
1
117.7
86
HH-PP
NoA
W
0.4
1
124.2
86
HH-PP
NoA
2
0.4
1
132
This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil 'j
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. -In many situations the,application amount shown cannot be
applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum.aoil
conditions.
ti

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

' 01/17/2017 15:51 NO.440 4001
To:
From:
Date:
Sub:
Pages:
Jackson Farming Company
122 Cox Pond Rudd
Mt. Olive, NC 29365
(91.9) 658-6717 (tel.)
(919) 6 58-1417 (fax)
j acksonf [e-mail]
� ( , -Lv
David Powel I
Michael Gilbert
January 17, 2017
Plan of Action
S pages including cover sheet

01/17/2017 15:51 N0.440 tt002
S
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILI
Facility Number: 31-22
County Duplin
Facility Name: De)aer,lacxson (1-20)
Certified onerarorName: Michael C. Gilbert Operator Number: AW19392
1. Current liquid level(S) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to tho
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways, ano from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for legoon3 with spillwayq.
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon Namel10: A B C 0
5pillway(Y or N): N N N Y
Levcl(inches); 15 15 16 21
2- Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard olovations of one or more struel
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable range_c.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or mor9 structures.
30 say Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN contont of rr
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is E
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving cror
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to i
not covered in the rgcility's CAWMP-
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated -
'Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulate
.if animals are to be moved to another permitted fac;;ity, provide facility number, la~goo
freeboard levels and hero population for the receiving facility
3- Earliest possible date to begin land aoolication of waste: 10-13 1,6 Weather permitting.
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and Included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the Information Is
accurate and correct.
Michael C. Gilbert Phone: [phone]
an ger (print)
Date: 1011moig
F.-wiL4,ewowIMandger (signature)

01/17/2017 15:51
NO.440 9003
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Nams/ldentifier (ID); 10exter Jackson 1-22
2, Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr, storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 15.0 inehee
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr, storm & structural freeboard 1 S_0 inches
c, line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 4.0 Inches
top of dike surface area according to design
d. (area at below structural freeboard elevation) F 70875 W
e, llne 0/12 x line d x 7.48 gallonslfe 176715 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down pwrivd
f. temporary slurage period according to structural design 180 days
g, volume of waste produced according to Structural design 11fS684 fto
h. current herd # 3675 certified herd It 36T5
actual wtwste produced = current herd # x line g = 118684 ft'
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design �ft�
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design 4N33.3 ftA
K. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48)( 30 days/line f= 201483 gallons
4. Total PAN to be land appliad during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 8122/2016 1,25
m. ((lines e * k)/1000) x line i = 464 lbs. PAN
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
r

01/17/2017 15:51
N0.440 #004
PLAN OF ACTION (PeA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. SL►uuturu Narrro/loontltror (10): 13
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 0
b. dcsigncd 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0
o. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 4.0
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) I r-
e. line i;,12 x Iirle Li X ; 43 Ualluir--/rl} 207960
3. Projeoted volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design F 8 61
g. volume of r:!aste produced according to structural design 11 isf84
n. Current herd # 3F r 5 certiTiea sera #1 3675
actual waste produced = current herd t* x line g = 11868-4
,rertifled herd 14
i. volume of wash water according to structural design 0
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design � 51333.3�
K. (iines h + i.+ j) x 7.48 x 30 clays/line f= 211955
d. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current %waste analysis dated 8/22120161 1.31
m. ((hnc C i. lc)/1000) x line I = 550.1
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown seiow)
PoA (30 Gay) 2121100

01/17/2017 15:52
H0.440 4005
PLAN OF ACTION {POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/identifier (ID): G
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 16.0
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & Structural freeboard 19,0
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 3 0
d, top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 8807E
e, Ilne cif 2 x line a x 7.45 gaiionsM3 164702
3. Projected volume of wasto liquid produced during drove down period
f, temporary storage period according to structural design 1B0
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 121451
h. current hero # 3675 certified herd A[_ 3675
actual waste produced = ourrcnt hsrd is x line g = 121451
certified herd !1
i, volume of wash water according to structural design I)
j_ excess rainfall over evaporation according to design 56933
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 X 30 dayslline f= 777365
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
1. current waste analysis dated 8/22/2016 1,3$
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I = 53t3.1
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

01/17/2017 15:52
H0.440 4006
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I, TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): F
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm Storage & structural freeboard
a_ current liquid level according to marker 21.0
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 30.0
e. line b - line a (inches in red zone) a 9.0
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 12475E
e. line c/1 2 x line of x 7.46 9allonSM3 699881
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during drew down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 18D
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 121157.1
h. current herd a F--35-75� certified herd # 3675
actual waste produced = current herd t1 x line 9 = 121157
certified herd It
i, volume of wash water according to structured design 0
j_ excess rainfall over evaporation according to design 92546
K. (lines h + i + j) x 7,48 X 30 clays/line f= ?65417
4 Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 6/22/20160.93
m, ((lines a .�- k)/1000) x line I = 898.7
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00

01/17/2017 15:52
ri0.440 4007
11. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ANDIOR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY.
1_ Structure 10:
A
line rn =
464,1 lb PAN
2. Structure ID.,
8
line m =
550.1 lb PAN
3, Structure 117),
r_,
line m =
536.1 lb PAN
4. Structurp If)-
D
line m =
898.7 lb PAN
5. Structure In-
line m =
lb PAN
6. Structure Q
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 4 5 + 6 = 2470.9 lb PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
DFQInn nn MAT 1 I_CT FIFI nC TA WMIt'M DAM r-AMMAT BF ADDLIED 01J121MM THIS 30 DAY PCQIOB_
0. tract #
p. field 9
q. Crop
►. merps
e. rernalnlno Alt-
2 PAN balance
(1011acre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD I1ba.)
column r x S
U. appfiea6on window'
86
W
Wheat
5.29
112.10
593,0
SEP-APR
86
x
Wheat
4,67
111.50
520.7
SEP-APR
86
Y
Wheat
4.76
111.70
531.7
SEP-APR
86
Z
Wheat
4_96
111.60
553.5
SEP APR
86
AA
Wheat
4.73
111,50
527.4
SEP-APR
v. I oral rAri avauame for an Tlelas (sum or column r) =
IV, FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) _
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III)
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) =
zteb.s In. I API
2470.9 lb. PAN
2726.3 lb. PAN
-255.4 lb. PAN

01/17/2017 15:52
N0.440 9008
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and haul,
depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN based on new
information. IF ocew rialda are to be included a5 an option for lowering lagoon lever, add these fields to the PAN
balance table and recalculate tho overall PAN balance. if animal waste is to be hauled to another permitted facility,
provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the receiving facility.

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
PAT MCCRORY
(;mernfir
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Sec relary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
/ )Irecfor
May 2, 2016
Neal Benton
BB&T P.O. Box 1677
Goldsboro, NC 27533
Subject Dexter Jackson Farm
AWS3100022
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Benton.
The North Carolina Division of Environmental quality received a request from your office if any non-
compliance issues have been found at the Dexter Jackson Farm (31-22).
Researching our files in the Wilmington Regional Office shows that the Dexter Jackson Farm (31-22) has
no compliance issue over the previous three years. If you have any questions concerning this letter
please contact David Powell at [phone].
Sincerely,
David Powell
Environmental Specialist
State ui' North Carolina I linvhonmcntal Quality 1 Water Kesourccs
161 1 Mail service Centel ; Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-161 1
919 707 9000

J
WUP Conditional Amendment
For
Dexter Jackson 1-20
William Jackson Owner
Duplin County
In February to March 2015 on pulls DD-PP, Mr. Jackson plans to prepare the field to
plant sweet potatoes for plant production. These plants will be transplanted in April to
May into other fields. Mr. Jackson will follow the existing WUP when sweet potato
plants are removed and soybeans are planted. The N rate for sweet potatoes is 50
Ibs/acre.
This is a 12 month conditional amendment beginning 1/1/2015 and ending 12/31/2015.
Attached is the temporary plan for sweet potato plant production.
Owner
j (Print)
Date
(Si ature)
C, LZ- V "i C t ► r :,IJ Technical Specialist
(Print)
C4�, c 4— Date
(Signature)
nECEIVE
. Nov 2 5 2014
BY:

Dexter Jackson 1-20
YOUR TEMPORARY WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract No.
Pull No.
Soil Type
Crop
Code
Yield/Ac
Lbs. N
unit
Acres
Lbs N
Used
Month to
Apply
Lbs. N
Per Ac.
73
A-E2
OrB
CB/Hay
6.3
46
17.10
5113
MAR-SEP
299
73
A-E2
OrB
SG/Hay
1
50
17.1
855
OCT-MAR
50
70
F-N
NoA
Corn
138
0.95
25.00
3275
FEB15-JUN
131
70
F-N
NoA
Wheat
60
2.09
25.00
3125
SEP-MAR
125
70
F-N
NoA
-Soybeans
35
3.91
25.00
3425
APR-SEP15
137
87
O-V
OrB
Corn
144
0.95
14.60
2000
FEB15-JUN
137
87
O-V
OrB
Wheat
60
2.09
14.60
1825
SEP-MAR
125
87
O-V
OrB
Soybeans
38
3.91
14.60
2175
APR-SEP15
149
86
W-CC
NoA
Corn
138
0.95
17.40
2279
FEB15-JUN
131
86
W-CC
NoA
Wheat
60
2.09
17.40
2175
SEP-MAR
125
86
W-CC
NoA
Soybeans
35
3.91
. 17.40
2384
APR-SEP15
137
F 86
DD GGi
GoA
S .Po#atoes:
- -
50 00
73 6ti
` M
FEf3°�APR'
50
86. •
SM GG
- _ GOA,
S..Rbe_ansj
M38M
W3NM.6.90
WgiW
Ni R SEP S'`;
HR49M
86s
qW
NoA
[Sft faioe
Wq51M
tRWOM3W00
f7.50
FE A R
50 d
"Ma
OEM
awam
86
HFl AP
NaA
So bea0s
35
` n3 k
W ]9MO
Total 179.70 34472lbs.
Available Nitrogen 33810 lbs.
Surplus or deficit -662 lbs.
,' Pulls with temporary plan

Dexter Jackson 1-20
YOUR TEMPORARY WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract No.
Pull No.
Soil Type
Crop
Code
Yield/Ac
Lbs. N
unit
Acres
Lbs N
Used
Month to
Apply
Lbs. N
Per Ac.
73
A-E2
OrB
CB/Hay
6.3
46
17.10
5113
MAR-SEP
299
73
A-E2
OrB
SG/Hay
1
50
17.1
855
OCT-MAR
50
70
F-N
NoA
Corn
138
0.95
25.00
3275
FEB15-JUN
131
70
F-N
NoA
Wheat
60
2.09
25.00
3125
SEP-MAR
125
70
F-N
NoA
Soybeans
35
3.91
25.00
3425
APR-SEP15
137
87
O-V
OrB
Corn
144
0.95
14.60
2000
FEB15-JUN
137
87
O-V
OrB
Wheat
60
2.09
14.60
1825
SEP-MAR
125
87
O-V
OrB
Soybeans
38
3.91
14.60
2175
APR-SEP15
149
86
W-CC
NoA
Corn
138
0.95
17.40
2279
FEB15-JUN
131
86
W-CC
NoA
Wheat
60
2.09
17.40
2175
SEP-MAR
125
86
W-CC
NoA
Soybeans
35
3.91
17.40
2384
APR-SEP15
137
86
+pG
col#
5. Potafoes;`
5(3:Q0
136D
,. '68011
B;APR
�50
r
m
--
t
fi
I DD GG'
GoA
Soybeans
0:
1013
APRr5EP 5;
R
W#&OM
FAFIH PPS
NoA
�S± Potatoes
Mff50
3S?00
750
EBIWPR
50 -
.
.. _
ft—AAsa
ftf8 ,-
HH P
NaA_
F yh`ean`s
35;
3 1
%750.
,, 2398
TAPrNEP15;
. 137
Total 179.70 34472lbs.
Available Nitrogen 33810 lbs.
Surplus or deficit -662 lbs.
'-":` Pulls with temporary plan

Waste Utilization Plan
Producer:
William Jackson
Name of Farm:
Dexter Jackson 1-20
Location:
814 Country Club Road
Mt Olive NC 28365
Phone:
919-922-7861
Type of Operation:
Feed -Finish
Number of Animal:
14700
Storage Structure:
Anaerobic Lagoon
Method of Application:
Irrigation
Amount of waste produced per year:
Amount of plant available
N (PAN) produced/year:
County: Duplin
27930ton/year
33810 lbs./year
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
poNution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste
should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the
fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in the implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally
safe manner.
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are
established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils , when it is raining, or when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may in runoff to the surface waters which is not
allowed under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crops production and to reduce the potential for
pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30 days
prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or disking will
conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change methods
in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different applications methods are
not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which

Dexter Jackson 1-20
Page 2
could allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving
waste to be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and the crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production. This
waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract No.
Pull No.
Soil Type
Crop
Code
Yield/Ac
Lbs. N
unit
Acres
Lbs N
Used
Month to
Appl
Lbs. N
Per Ac.
73
A-E2
OrB
CB/Hay
6.3
46
17.10
5113
MAR-SEP
299
73
A-E2
OrB
SG/Hay
1
5D
17.1
855
OCT-MAR
50
70
F-N
NoA
Corn
138
0.95
25.00
3275
FEB15 JUN
131
70
F-N
NoA
Wheat
60
2.09
25.00
3125
SEP-MAR
125
70
F-N
NoA
Soybeans
35
3.91
25.00
3425
APR-SEP15
137
87
O-V
OrB
Corn
144
0.95
14.60
2000
FEB15-JUN
137
87
O-V
OrB
Wheat
60
2.09
14.60
1825
SEP-MAR
125
87
O-V
OrB
Soybeans
38
3.91
14.60
2175
APR-SEP15
149
86
W-CC
NoA
Corn
138
0.95
17.40
2279
FEB15-JUN
131
86
W-CC
NoA
Wheat
60
2.09
17.40
2175
SEP-MAR
125
86
W-CC
NoA
Soybeans
35
3.91
17.40
2384
APR-SEP15
137
86
DD-GG
GoA
Corn
156
0.95
6.80
1006
FEB15-JUN
148
86
DD-GG
GoA
Wheat
65
2.09
6.80
925
SEP-MAR
136
86
DD-GG
GoA
Soybeans
38
3.91
6.80
1013
APR-SEP15
149
86
HH-PP
NoA
Corn
138
0.95
17.50
2293
FEB15-JUN
131
86
HH-PP
NoA
Wheat
60
2.09
17.50
2188
SEP-MAR
1 125
86
HH-PP
NoA
Soybeans,
35
3.91
17.50
239$
APR-SEP15
1 137
Total 179.7 38454lbs.
Available Nitrogen 33810 lbs.
Surplus or deficit -4644 lbs.
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply
the waste in a timely manner.

Dexter Jackson 1-20 Page 3
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. In the future,
regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that
addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc. interseeded in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through
grazing, hay and /or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they reach a height of six to nine
inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four inches. In fields where small grain
etc. is to be removed for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small grain to reach maturity,
especially late in the season ( i.e. April or May) Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will
definitely interfere with the stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less
nitrogen being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is the normal
situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or silage
two to three times during the season, depending on the time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc. is late September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a height of about two inches before drilling for best
results.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying summer annuals under stressed conditions. Nitrate poisoning
may occur in livestock. Sampling forage or hay for nitrate levels is recommended.
Acres shown in the tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding required buffers, filters strips along
ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving full application rates due to
equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the field listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres
shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates.
The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients
or other elements. Your production facility will produce approximately 5292 lbs. of plant available
nitrogen per year in the sludge.
if you remove sludge every 5 years you will have approximately 26460 lbs. of PAN to utilize. Assuming
you apply this PAN to hybrid bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 Ibs/acre you will need 88
acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at the rate of 125 lbs. of nitrogen per acre you will need 212
acres of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and the land needed. Actual
requirements could vary by 25% depending on the sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and
application methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation such that
runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water
droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity

Dexter Jackson 1-20 Page 4
of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of
the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the producer and
irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres shown in tables.
Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan
invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Tract No.
Field No.
Soil Type
Crop
Code
Applic.
Rate(in/hr)
Applic.
Amount
73
A-E2
OrB
CB/Hay
0.5
1.0
73
A-E2
OrB
SG/Hay
0.5
1.0
70
F-N
NoA
Corn
0.4
1.0
70
F-N
NoA
Wheat
0.4
1.0
70
F-N "
NoA
Soybeans
0.4
1.0
87
O-V
OrB
Corn
0.4
1.0
87
O-V
OrB
Wheat
0.4
1.0
87
O-V
OrB
Soybeans
0.4
1.0
86
W-CC
NoA
Corn
0.4
1.0
86
W-CC
NoA
Wheat
0.4
1.0
86
W-CC
NoA
Soybeans
0.4
1.0
86
DD-GG
GoA
• Corn
0.4
1.0
86
DD-GG
GoA
Wheat
0.4
1.0
86
DD-GG
GoA
Soybeans
0.4
1.0
86
HH-PP
NoA
Corn
0.4
1.0
86
HH-PP
NoA
Wheat
0.4
1.0
86
HH-PP
NoA
So beans
0.4
1.0
i

Dexter Jackson 1-20
Page 5
This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the
crop is not over applied. In many situations the application amount shown cannot be applied because of the
nitrogen limitations. The maximum application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the
average of once every 6 months. In no instances should the volume of the waste be stored in your structure
be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour
storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and the waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment is operated
properly to apply the correct rates shown in the tables. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of
nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you have receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the
amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION

Dexter Jackson 1-20 Page 6
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of
an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the
use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level
of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per
year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG
standard 393 - Filter Strip).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. when applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland,
the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate that runoff
does not occur offsite or to the surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9. - Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a
high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste
shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 11 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal
waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).

Dexter Jackson 1-20 Page 7
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned
by he landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainage ways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from wash down facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced as necessary to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidences of
erosion, leakage or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetation and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste
during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and the bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metal approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.

• Page 8
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Dexter Jackson 1-20
Owner/Manager Agreement William Jackson
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and maintenance proce-
dures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any
expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
before the new animals are stocked. l (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste
from this system to the surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24 hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: William Jackson
Signature:
Name of Manager (If different from owner)
Signature:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: G. Glenn Clifton
Date: //_ j
Date:
Affiliation: Prestage Farms, Inc. Phone: [phone]
Address: P.O. Box 438
Clinton, NC 28329
Signature: ;R. AQk.._ �'.L+r� �,. Date:

Sep 11 12 01:11 p Jackson Farming Co. 9196581417 P• 1
i
VtAJ I) U%
qI o - 3 5 0 �Z°O'f
.boo �wQ
RAN;
A�/rNDA-
f-�to✓� D�k�
SA C, KS 0 �l
✓G k
0(1 e 5e 04
OVKV
"Y pw } (. Z7ZJ
I b,07r

as
Waters Agricultural Laboratories, Inc.
257 Newton fflghway P.O. Box 382
Camilla, GA 31730
[phone] FAX [phone] Oka ffb
WfUJAM JACESON CROP PRODUCTiON SERV(CES i I
Soil Analysis Report
:kaccjv—e4- 31212012
PO BOX 457
NCDA Index F�Iild IM' PLASTIC
CLINTON, NC 28328 LPr9t,se.d:1 3/612012
. ........ .
K- pH r Is
Le#) Number Sam ID
........... ..... ..
Wed—ium A=Adequate H VA ---Very High ,7L=Low M= ��-�iTig—h. — —
'9
N)
(S)

Waters Agricultural Laboratories, Inc.
257 Newton Highway P.O. Box 382
Camilla, GA 31730 1
Gram [phone] FAX [phone]VOW, AaXTBUT01 am
CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES :Grower: WHAM A MON We untF
I I Soil Analysis Report
PO 80X 457 �Received: 302012
NCDA Index field IV., mAsTic 3r-701 2
CUNTON, NC 28328
............... -------
PH L�—Ci LIS--i L&(Li�al P'Ti [—M�-'( Itt!ts/T21 LdL—, ICEC
, 665T
ME OM3b—j [t�
.Lab MljL, Sample
['L=CO—W—M=Me'diurn A=Adequate H=High VH - =Vej—�t
�h
. �
0
-n
0
P
to
W

PA
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H, Sullins
Governor Director
October 1, 2009
William Dexter Jackson
Dexter Jackson Farm
814 Country Club Road
Mount Olive, NC 28365
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310022
Dexter Jackson Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin County
Dear William Dexter Jackson:
In accordance with your renewal request, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to William Dexter Jackson, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. This COC replaces the COC
previously issued on October 1, 2009.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Dexter Jackson Farm, located in Duplin County, with a swine animal capacity of
no greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: 14700 Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS310022 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keening forms.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carohna 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]lCustomer Service:1-877-623-6748 orthCaro na
Internet: vrww.ncwa#erqualiry.org
An Equal Opportunity % Affirmative ACMn Lmployer �/ "

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in. this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable: A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding. .
In accordance with Condition II.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Newport/Morehead City, NC
National Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at:
www.erh.noaa.gov/er/mhx/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section%.
Duplin County Health Department MAR
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWS310022)
AFO Notebooks
-2-

Waste Utilization Plan
Producer.
Dexter Jackson County: Duplin
Name of Farm:
Dexter Jackson 1-20
Location:
814 Country Club Rd.
Mt. Olive NC 28365
Phone:
910-658-2333
Type of Operation:
Feed- Finish
Number of Animal:
14700
Storage Structure:
Anaerobic Lagoon
Method of Application:
Irrigation
Amount of waste produced per year: 27930 ton/year
Amount of plant available N (PAN) produced/year: 33810 Ibs./year
31-t,�
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste
should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the
fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in the implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally
safe manner.
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are
established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils , when it is raining, or when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may in runoff to the surface waters which is not
allowed under DWO regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crops production and to reduce the potential for
pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30 days
prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or disking will
conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change methods
in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different applications methods are
not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste an 1 QOVJt1rWED
your waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which
MAR 3 0 2009
BY:
RECEIVED 1 DENR I DWQ
Aglflfpr ProtP(tion Section
MAR 2 6 2009

Dexter Jackson 1-20
Page 2
could allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving
waste to be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis. content and the crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production. This
waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract No.
Pull No.
Soil Type
. Crop
Code
Yield/Ac
Lbs. N
unit
Acres
Lbs N
Used
Month to
Apply
Lbs. N
Per Ac.
73 1
A-131
OrB
CB -Ha
6.3
50.00
4.71
1484
MAR-OCT
315
70
B2-N
NoA
Corn
110
1.07
31.15
3666
MAR-JUN
117.7
70
B2-N
NoA
Wheat
60
2.07
31.15
3869
SEP-APR
124.2
70
B2-N
NoA
Soybeans
33
4.00
31.15
4112
JUN-AUG
132
87
O-V
OrB
Corn
120
1.08
14.60
1892
MAR-JUN
129.6
87
O-V
OrB
Wheat
55
2.04
14.60
1638
SEP-APR
112.2
87
O-V
OrB
Soybeans
38
4:00
14.60
2219
JUN-AUG
152
86
W-KK
NoA
Corn
110
1.07
28.00
3296
MAR-JUN
117.7
86
W-KK
NoA
Wheat
60
2.07
28.00
34711
SEP-APR
124.2
86
W-KK
NoA
Soybeans
33
4.00
28.00
3696
JUN-AUG
132
86
LL-00
L B
Corn
115
1.08
6.80
845
MAR-JUN
124.2
86
LL-00
L B
Wheat
60
2.07
6.80
845
SEP-APR
124.2
86
LL-00
Ly13
Soybeansl
38
4.00
6.80
1034
JUN-AUG
152
86
PP-XX
NoA
Corn
110
1.07
17.50
2060
MAR-JUN
117.7
86
PP-XX
NoA
Wheat
60
2.07
17.50
2174
SEP-APR
124.2
86
PP-XX
NoA
Soybeans
33
4.00
17.50
132
JUN-AUG
132
Total 200.81 36437 lbs.
Available Nitrogen 33810 lbs.
Surplus or deficit -2627 lbs.
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply
the waste in a timely manner.

-20 Page 3
applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. In the future,
regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that
addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc. interseeded in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through
grazing, hay and /or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they reach a height of six to nine
inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four inches. In fields where small grain
etc. is to be removed for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small grain to reach materity,
especially late in the season ( i.e. April or May) Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will
definitely interfere with the stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less
nitrogen being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is the normal
situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You -may want to consider harvesting hay or silage
two to three times during the season, depending on the time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc. is late September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a freight of about two inches before drilling for best
results.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying summer annuals under stressed conditionO Nitrate poisoning
may occur in livestock. Sampling forage or hay for nitrate levels is recommended.
Acres shown in the tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding required buffers, filters strips along
ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving full application rates due to
equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the field listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres
shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The
sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or
other elements. Your production facility will produce approximately 5292 lbs. of plant available
nitrogen per year in the sludge.
If you remove sludge every 5 years you will have approximately 26460 lbs. of PAN to utilize. Assuming you
apply this PAN to hybrid bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 lbs. per acre you will nee( 88
acres of land. If you apply the sludge to com at the rate of 125 lbs. of nitrogen per acre you will need 212
acres of land. Please be aware that these are only estmates of the PAN and the land needed. Actual
requirements could vary by 25% depending on the sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and
application methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation such that
runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water
droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity

Dexter Jackson 1-20
Page 4
of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of
the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the producer and
irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrrigate the acres shown in tables.
Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan
invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Tract No.
Field No.
Soil Type
Crop
Code
Applic.
Rate(in/hr)
Applic.
Amount
73
A-131
OrB
CB -Hay
0.50
1.00
70
B2-N
NoA
Corn
0.40
1.00
70
B2-N
NoA
Wheat
0.40
1.00
70
132-N
NoA
Soybeans
0.40
1.00
87
O-V
OrB
Corn
0.40
1.00
87
O-V
OrB
Wheat
0.40
1.00
87
O-V
OrB
Soybeans
0.40
1.00
86
W-KK
NoA
Corn
0.40
1.00
86
W-KK
NoA
Wheat
0.40
1.00
86
W-KK
NoA
Soybeans
0.40
1.00
86
LL-00
L B
Corn
0.40
1.00
86
LL-00
L B
Wheat
0.40
1.00
86
LL-00
L B
Soybeansl
0.40
1.00
86
PP-XX
NoA
Corn
0.40
1.00
86
PP-XX
NoA
Wheat
0.40
1.00
86
PP-XX
NoA
Soybeans
0.40
1.00
u

Dexter Jackson 1-20
Page 5
This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the
crop is not over applied. In many situations the application amount shown cannot be applied because of the
nitrogen limitations. The maximum application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the
average of once every 6 months. In no instances should the volume of the waste be stored in your structure
be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour
storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and the waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment is operated
properly to apply the correct rates shown -in the tables. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of
nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you have receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the
amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to appling the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Pulls XX are in a two year rotation of Corn, Wheat and Soybeans. The acres are reduced by one-half to allow
for PAN for each year.

Page 6
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Dexter Jackson 1-20
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any
expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)
before the new.animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from
this system to the surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24 hour storm.
The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation
District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Dexter Jackson
Signature: v
Name of ManageIr (Ifp�iffereft flom owner)
A �'' II I
Signature:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: G. Glenn Clifton
Affiliation: Prestage Farms, Inc.
Address: P.O. Box 438
Clinton, NC 28329
Signature: J,Z' Cwt,.,,.
Phone: [phone]
Date: 1- 3l - 0 3
Date: 1-3 j-0'?
Date:

Land owner:
Irrigation System
Designation:
Wetted Diameter:
Spacing:
Hydrant Layout
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
Dexter Jackson Facility Number: 31-22
X Existing Irrigation System New/Expanding
Irrigation System
300 feet
240 feet
X Multiple Hydrants Single Hydrant
Pull
Number
Lane
Spacing_
Pull
Length
Location
Ext/Int
Middle
Start
End
Stop
End
Total
Acres
A
Single
123
Ext.
0.76
0.77
1.53
131
Single
389
Ext.
2.41
0.77
3.18
B2
240
287
Ext.
1.78
0.77
2.55
C1
240
265
Ext.
1.64
0.77
1.32
C2
240
222
Int.
1.22
0.73
1.95
D1
240
265
Int.
1.46
0.73
1.22
D2
240
215
Int.
1.18
0.73
1.91
E1
240
265
Ext.
1.64
0.77
1.32
E2
240
215
Ext.
1.33
0.77
2.10
F
240
505
Ext.
3.13
0.77
3.90
G
240
1011
Int.
5.57
0.73
6.30
H
240
847
Int.
4.47
0.73
5.40
1
240
361
Int.
1.99
0.73
2.72
J
240
785
Ext.
4.86
0.77
5.64
K
240
1065
Int.
5.87
0.73
6.60
L.
245
1365
Int.
7.33
0.73
8.06
M
223
1171
Int.
5.75
0.73
6.48
N
205
745
Ext.
4.05
0.77
4.82
O
240
365
Ext.
2.26
0.77
3.03
P
240
465
Int.
2.56
0.73
3.30
0
240
565
Int,
3.11
0.73
3.84
R
240
591
Int.
3.26
0.73
3.99
S
240
591
Int.
3.26
0.73
3.99
T
240
591
Int.
3.26
0.73
3.99
U
240
315
Ext.
1.95
0.77
2.72
V
Sin le
591
Ext.
3.66
0.77
4.43
W
220
762
Ext
4.54
0.75
5.29
X
220
789
Int.
3.98
0.69
4.67
Y
220
805
Int.
4.07
0.69
4.76
Z
220
845
Int.
4.27
0.69
4.96
AA
220
800
Int.
4.04
0.69
4.73
BB
220
715
Int.
3.61
0.69
4.30
CC
220
710
Int.
3.59
0.69
4.28
DD
220
615
Int.
3.11
0.69
3.80
EE
220
555
Int,
2.80
0.69
3.49
FF
220
500
Int.
2.53
0.69
3.22
GG
220
450
Int.
2.27
0.69
2.96

Pull
Number
Lane
Spacing
Pull
Length
Location
Ext/Int
Middle
Start
End
Stop
End
Total
Acres
HH
220
380
Int.
1.92
0.69
2.61
II
220
350
Int.
1.77
0.69
2.46
JJ
220
310
Int.
1.57
0.69
2.26
KK
220
245
Ext
1.46.
0.75
2.21
LL
240
287
Ext.
1.78
0.77
2.55
MM
240
459
Int.
2.53
0.73
3.26
NN
240
456
Int.
2.53
0.73
3.26
00
240
690
Int.
3.80
0.73
4.53
PP
240
690
Int.
3.80
0.7.3
4.53
QQ
240
490
Int.
2.70
0.73
3.43
RR
240
440
Ext.
2.73
0.77
3.50
SS
240
140
Ext.
0.87
0.77
1.64
TT
240
657
Int.
3.62
0.73
4.35
UU
240
557
Int.
3.07
0.73
3.80
W
240
657
Int.
3.62
0.73
4.35
WW
240
675
Int,
3.72
0.73
4.45
XX
240
675
Ext.
4.18
0.77
4.95
200.89 acres
have measured each pull and have submitted these measurements for computation.
Owner: Date: I - 3 t -a 3
De der ackson
Computed By:w,. C4:,c, Date: 1131163
G. Glenn Clift6n
WA-Techn. Specialist
Prestage Farms, Inc.

IRRIGATION SYSTEM PARAMETERS
Land Owner: Dexter Jackson Date: 07/31/2003
Address: 814 Country Club Road
Mt. Olive NC 28365 Facility No. 31-22
Telephone: [phone]
County: Du lin
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications
Field No.
and/or
Pull No.
Maximum
Usable
Size of
Pull
Soil Tvpe
Slope
%
Crop(s)(
Maximum
Application
Rate
in/hr
Maximum
Application
per Irrigation
Cycle
inches
A
1.53
OrB
2-6
Bermuda -Hay
0.5
1.0
131
3.18
OrB
2-6
Bermuda -Hay
0.5
1.0
132
2.55
OrB
2-6
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.5
1.0
C1
1.32
OrB
2-6
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.5
1.0
C2
1.95
OrB
2-6
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.5
1.0
D1
1.22
OrB
2-6
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.5
1.0
D2
1.91
OrB
2-6
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.5
1.0
El
1.32
OrB
2-6
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.5
1.0
E2
2.10
OrB
2-6
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.5
1.0
F
3.90
NoA
0-2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
G
6.30
NoA
0-2
Com, Wheat, So eans
0.4
1.0
H
5.40
NoA
0-2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
1
2.72
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
J
5.64
NoA
0-2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0 ,
K
6.60
NoA
0-2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
L
8.06
NoA
0-2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
M
6.48
NoA
0-2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
N
4.82
NoA
0-2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
O
3.03
OrB
2-6
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
P
3.30
OrB
2-6
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
Q
3.84
OrB
2-6
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
R
3.99
OrB
2-6
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
S
3.99
OrB
2-6
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
T
3.99
OrB
2-6
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
U
2.72
OrB
2-6
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
V
4.43
OrB
2.6
Com, Wheat, Soybeans 1
0.4
1.0
W
5.29
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
X
4.67
NoA
0-2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
Y
4.76
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
Z
4.96
NoA
0-2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
AA
4.73
NoA
0-2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
BB
4.30
NoA
0-2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
CC
4.28
NoA
0-2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
DD
3.80
NoA
0-2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
EE
3.49
NoA
0-2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
FF
3.22
NoA
0-2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
GG
2.96
NoA
0-2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
HH
2.61
NoA
0-2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0

Field No.
and/or
Pull No.
Maximum
Usable
Size of
Field
Soil Type
Slope
%
Crop(s)(
Maximum
Application
Rate
in/hr
Maximum
Application
per Irrigation
Cycle
inches
II
2.46
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
JJ
2.26
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
KK
2.21
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
LL
2.55
LyB
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
MM
3.26
L B
2-6
Corn, Wheat, _Soybeans
0.4
1.0
NN
3.26
L B
2-6
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
00
4.53
L B
2-6
Cam, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
PP
4.53
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
QQ
3.43
NoA
0-2
Corn , Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
RR
3.50
NoA
0-2
Corn,Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
SS
1.64
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
TT
4.35
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
UU
3.80
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
s 1.0
VV
4.35
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
W W
4.45
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
XX
4.95
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
Computed By: .. �'.�..
G. Glenn Clifton
WA-Techn. Specialist

Michael F. Easley, Governor
o�OF W A TF�pG
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 1, 2007 ��CEIVED
William Dexter Jackson
Dexter Jackson Farm ,JUN 2 6 2007
814 Country Club Rd
Mount Olive, NC 28365 BY:
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310022
Dexter Jackson Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Duplin County
Dear William Dexter Jackson:
In accordance with your application received on 18-Dec-06, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to William Dexter Jackson, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Dexter Jackson Farm, located in Duplin County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 14700 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 - Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition 111.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility: Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay
careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Internet: wwwmcwateraualitv.ors Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604
An Equal OpporturiglAffirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
Telephone:
Fax 1:
Fax 2:
Customer Service:
o"`
NCarolina
J tura!!y
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under_this permuit'convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon- abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the.facility.. ?y
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0111(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6_4. through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection staff may be reached at 910-395-3900_ If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at (919) 733-
3221.
Sincerely,
�r
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc`s)
Duplin County Health Department
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS310022

a
ANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM
r
certificate of Coverage or Pen -nit Number PC A 2 316;20� County Z) 14 I/ A/ Year 200
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permmi�NT- t) x p
Operator in Charge for this Facility f C- 6 f-1 J(Certification#�f �3 ` 2—
Lqn) application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during
YES NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part 11 and proceed to the certif1 i ,
waste was generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the ani
handled*T1
.
Part I : Facility Information:
Total number of application Fields ❑ or Pulls X (please check the appropriate box) in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): —5'4/ Total Useable Acres approved in the
CAWMP 2 01),
2. Total number of Fields ❑ or Pulls ❑ (please check the appropriate box) on which land application
occurred during the year: Total Acres on which waste was applied IN 3 -7
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
11267,17
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP
and the permit: 3
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and
taken off site during the year /1/&I/% C tons ❑ or gallons ❑ (please check the appropriate box)
G. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
3 77o
7. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year:
Largest LMD
Smallest
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals
at the facility is the annual average numbers)
S. Facility's Integrator if applicable: rr
Part 11: Facility Status:
✓I"
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING 'CHIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE,
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during XYes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
AFACF 3-14-03

?. The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from ,Yes ❑ No
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during'
the past calendar year.
3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past Yes ❑ No
calendar year.
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at:,this facility during ;ryes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
5. There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the KYes ❑ No
levels specified in this facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year.
b. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year. XYes ❑ No
7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon Yes ❑ No
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume
for which the lagoon was designed.
8. A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this CertificationX Yes ❑ No
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the Yes ❑ No
past calendar year.
10. Soil pH was, maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year? ,Yes ❑ No
11. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's Yes ❑ No
permit during; the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during XYes []No
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
13. Crops as specified in the CAWMP were maintained during the past calendar year on all [Yes ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's pen -nit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were KYes ❑ No .
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system,
or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
APIC - e5 0 AJ OW /U er&
Pennittee Name -and Title (type or
VC
Signature of Operafifin CParge
(if different from Pennittee)
Z -z -D (O
Date
2 -Z-0&
'Date
AFACF 3-14-03 2

/[44%' �_
Lagoon Sludge Survey Forme
A. Farm Permit or DWQ identification Number �n
B. Lagoon Identification DPAP.r- � la clsyE � l - 5) LWo
C. Person(s) taking Measurements J c
D. Date of Measurements ?- )q -
E. Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer:
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soil) of lagoon:
c,_f IV e4l T-j _
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler":
r,l.A
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): .3 (acres)
(Draw sketch of lagoon on a separate sheet and list dimensions, and calculate surface area.)
G. Estimate number of sampling points:
a. Less than 1.33 acre. Use 8 points
b. If more than 1.33 acre, a -3 acres x 6 = I q with maximum of 24,
(Using sketch and dimensions, develop a uniform "grid" that has number of intersection points that match
most closely with the estimated number of sampling points needed. Number the grid intersection points on
the lagoon grid to correspond with the data to be recorded for points of measurement.)
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Sheet".
1.-.. _At time of sludge survey, also measure the distance -from the Maximum -Liquid Lever - - - to the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gage pole):
J. Determine distance from Maximum Liquid Level to Minimum Liquid Level: 7 •�
(Determine from Plan or other lagoon records)
K. Calculate distance from present liquid surface level to Minimum Liquid
level: Item J — Item I, assuming present liquid level is below Max. Liq. Level:
L. Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points): �! {
M. Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the top of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points): • }
N. Record from sludge survey data sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer:
O. Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone (Item M — Item K): 5,
(Note: If Item O is less than 4 ft., a sludge removal and utilization plan may be required by
N. C. DWQ. See your specific permit or contact DWQ for more information.)
P. Proceed to Sludge Volume Worksheet if desire to calculate sludge volume for rectangular shaped
lagoon with uniform side slope. /
Com leted b Lcrm �f Date: .3 -zq - 4i P Y �m�x
Print Name Signature
White - Office Yellow - Producer
�j

Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Completed by: ,„, L-p r•.>
Print Name
Lagoon Identification:
w N x c r, J,Ckron 0 5)
Date:
Signature
(A)
Grid
Point
No.
(B)
Distance from liquid surface
to top of slud a
(C)
Distance from liquid surface
to la oon bottom soil
(C)-(B)
Thickness of sludge
la er
Ft- &inches
IFeet(tenthsfft.
&inches
Feet(tenths).Ft.
& inches
Feet tenths
1
4.'7
2
6.S
3
1.1
4
.
6
.S'. 6
7
5.9
S
,Z
9
10
�•�
12
�. y
13
S; 9
14
6. Y
-�--�
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Average
*All Grid Points and correspondinp- sludge layer thickness must be shown on a sketch
attached to this Sludge Survey Data Sheet.
See Appendix 6 for conversion from inches to tenths of feet.
White - Office Yellow - Producer

Lagoon Sludge Survey Form
J:tEcu-
A. Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number 3/-�� ��� 3 906
B. Lagoon Identification ]>v�}c-1r� �,�scon C 6-10)
C. Person(s) taking Measurements ,7.p f }l ✓lr.
D. Date of Measurements -3 _ a
E. Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of:
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer:
r
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soil) of lagoon:
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler":
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): / .q (acres)
(Draw sketch of lagoon on a separate sheet and list dimensions, and calculate surface area.)
G. Estimate number of sampling points:
a_ Less than 1.33 acre: Use 8 points
b. If more than 1.33 acre, 1, q acres x 6 = ��, with maximum of 24.
(Using sketch and dimensions, develop a uniform "grid" that has number of intersection points that match
most closely with the estimated number of sampling points needed. Number the grid intersection points on
the lagoon grid to correspond with the data to be recorded for points of measurement.)
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Sheet".
L- -At time of sludge survey; also measure the distance from the Maximum"Liquid Level to the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gage pole): --L, 7
J. Determine distance from Maximum Liquid Level to Minimum Liquid Level: ? t7
(Determine from Plan or other lagoon records)
K. Calculate distance from present liquid surface level to Minimum Liquid
level: Item J — Item I, assuming present liquid level is below Max. Liq. Level: • 3
L. Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points): 9 • Z.
M. Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the top of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points): 6.3
N. Record from sludge survey data sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer: 2.1
O. Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone (Item M — Item K): /a. cS
(Note: If Item 0 is less than 4 ft., a sludge removal and utilization plan may be required by
N. C. DWQ. See your specific permit or contact DWQ for more information.)
P. Proceed to Sludge Volume Worksheet if desire to calculate sludge volume for rectangular shaped
lagoon with uniform side slope.
Completed by j& )P.-C 1 /7m,_L___ 6111y,�2,2,- _ Date:
Print Name V signature
White - Office Yellow - Producer

Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Completed by: .-1 LannL _ _
Print Name
Lagoon Identification:
J t`6-10
Date. 3 --29 -QS
Signature
(A)
Grid
Point
No.
(g)
Distance from liquid surface
stud a
(C)
Distance from liquid surface
to lagoon bottom so!!
(C)-(B)
Thickness of sludge
la er
Ft. �inches
Feet tenths
Ft. & inches
Feet tenths
Ft. & inches
Feet tenths
1
6•1
2
S.
3
4
q.o
5
6
1
7
r
8
9
5: 7
10
S•`?
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Average
(,,3
*Ali Grid Points and correspondinp, sludge layer thickness must be shown on a sketch
attached to this Sludge Survey Data Sheet.
See Appendix 6 for conversion from inches to tenths of feet.
White - Ofice Yellow - Producer
It
2d

� j
Lagoon Sludge Survey Form FEB 1310
A. Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number Via'
B. Lagoon Identification , i r J
C. Person(s) taking Measurements,,. ez, Pi f�
D. Date of Measurements "a9 — O �7
E. Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of:
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer:
.Sonca r-
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soil) of lagoon:
? r
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler":
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): = ? (acres)
(Draw sketch of lagoon on a separate sheet and list dimensions, and calculate surface area.)
G. Estimate number of sampling points:
a. Less than 1.33 acre: Use 8 points
b. If more than 1.33 acre, A.• acres x 6 = I `{ , with maximum of 24.
(Using sketch and dimensions, develop a uniform "grid" that has number of intersection points that match
most closely with the estimated number of sampling points needed. Number the grid intersection points on
the lagoon grid to correspond with the data to be recorded for points of measurement.)
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Sheet".
I.- At time of sludge survey, also measure the distance from the -Maximum Liquid Level --
to the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gage pole): i • 3
J.
Determine distance from Maximum Liquid Level to Minimum Liquid Level:
—)• 0
(Determine from flan or other lagoon records) -
K.
Calculate distance from present liquid surface level to Minimum Liquid
level: Item J — Item I, assuming present liquid level is below Max. Liq. Level:
L.
Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points):
�. s
M.
Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the top of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points):
(7 •r]
N.
Record from sludge survey data sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer:
O.
Calculate the thickness of the. existing Liquid Treatment Zone (Item M — Item K):
(Note: If Item O is less than 4 It., a sludge removal and utilization plan may be required by
N. C. DWQ. See your specific permit or contact DWQ for more information.)
P. Proceed to Sludge Volume Worksheet if desire to calculate sludge volume for rectangular shaped
lagoon with uniform side slope.
Completed b
P Y .�/� mr--'_� !!.r m � � �i..�2.G` ��� Date: 3-.2`} - 05
Print Name r% Signature
White - Office Yellow - Producer

Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Completed by: —Les LA mb
Print Name
Lagoon Identification:
J rt�rs
�gc Date:
Signature
!/
(A)
Grid
Point
No.
(B)
Distance from liquid surface
to top of sludge
(C)
Distance from liquid surface
to lagoon bottom soil
(C)-(B)
Thickness of sludge
la er
Ft. & inches
Feet tenths
Ft. & inches
Feet tenths
Ft. & inches
Feet tenths
1
g. 3
2
U
3
4
5
S.8
6
SS
7
S.
8
sy
9
6.5,
10
11
7.1
12
'7. 'l
13
7.7
14
7.1
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Average
*All Grid Points and corresponding sludge laver thickness must be shown on a sketch
attached to this Sludge Survey Data Sheet.
See Appendix 6 for conversion from inches to tenths of feet.
White - Office Yellow - Producer

Lagoon Sludge Survey Form
A. Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number 31 - 2 Z
B. Lagoon Identification _ Dez. 4 P r
C. Person(s) taking Measurements ,,, v , 4- A J (� n _
D. Date of Measurements OS
E. Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of:
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer:
RECEIVED
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soil) of lagoon:
(��-4 vo,a r-c
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler":
F B 13 2006
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): 3. q (acres) .
(Draw sketch of lagoon on a separate sheet and list dimensions, and calculate surface area.)
G. Estimate number of sampling points:
a. Less than 1.33 acre: Use 8 points
b. if more than 1.33 acre, 3. tl acres x 6 d o with maximum of 24.
(Using sketch and dimensions, develop a uniform "grid" that has number of intersection points that match
most closely with the estimated number of sampling points needed. Number the grid intersection points on
the lagoon grid to correspond with the data to be recorded for points of measurement.)
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Sheet".
_ I. At time of sludge -survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level-
to the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gage pole): ), 7
J. Determine distance from Maximum Liquid Level to Minimum Liquid Level: .
(Determine from Plan or other lagoon records)
K_ Calculate distance from present liquid surface level to Minimum Liquid
level: Item J -- Item I, assuming present liquid level is below Max. Liq. Level: i.0
L. Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points): 9. o
M. Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the top of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points): 6.6
N. Record from sludge survey data sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer:
O. Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone (Item M - Item K):
(Note: If Item O is less than 4 ft., a sludge removal and utilization plan may be required by
N. C. DWQ. See your specific permit or contact DWQ for more information.)
P. Proceed to Sludge Volume Worksheet if desire to calculate sludge volume for rectangular shaped
lagoon with uniform side slope.
Completed by hty�.,Qc b Date: 3
Print Name Signature
White - Office Yellow - Producer

.4
Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Lagoon Identification:
Sludge Survey Data Sheet �a - P,r Jrks,,n 66--X)
Completed by: �J rx m¢ s 1� n_ Date: ��R - oS
Print Name Sig 4 ture
(A)
Grid
Point
No.
(B)
Distance from liquid surface
to top of sludge
(C)
Distance from liquid surface
to lagon bottom soil
(C)-(B)
Thickness of sludge
layer
Ft. & inches
Feet tenths
Ft. & inches
Feet tenths
Ft. & inches
Feet tenths
2
3
y
4
55
6
{p
7
8
7.
9
6.7
10
12
13
6.1
14
6.
15
. `)
16
b S
17
6.0
18
1
19
20
-----�
21
22
23
24
Average
6
*All Grid Points and corresponding slud a layer thickness must be shown on a sketch
attached to this Sludge Survey Data Sheet.
See Appendix 6 for conversion from inches to tenths of feet.
White - Office Yellow - Producer
if
:2O
31., 3'

�zo -APS
Waste Utilization Plan
i
Producer: Dexter Jackson County: Duplin
Name. of Farm: Dexter Jackson 1-20
Location: 814 Country Club Rd.
Mt. Olive NC 28365 31,22-
Phone: [phone]
Type of Operation: Feed- Finish RECEIVED/ DERR/OWQ
Number of Animal: 14700 ��i I OTECTIONSECn4N
Storage Structure: Anaerobic Lagoon 1 S 2006
Method of Applic2t;on: Irrigation DEC 2 2 2006
Amount of waste Oroduced per year: 27930 ton/year
Amount of plant available N (PAN) produced/year:
r
The waste from;your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste
13hould be used to:reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the
fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in the implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally
safe manner.
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil tykws are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per
year, Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are
established.
4. Do not' apply waste on saturated soils , when it is raining, or when the surface is
frozen., Either of these conditions may in runoff to the surface waters which is not
allowed under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crops production and to reduce the potential for
pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied ROM more than 30 days
prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or disking will
conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change methods
in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different applications methods are
not the same. {
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility` Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which
}

t.
Dexter Jackson 1-20 Page 2
;1
could allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving
waste to be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and the crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH. in the optimum range for specific crop production. This
waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission,
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
t
Tract No.
Pull No.
Soil Type
Crop
Code
Yield/Ac
Lbs. N
unit
Acres
Lbs N
Used
Month to
Apply
Lbs. N
Per Ac.
73
A-B1
OrB
CB -Hay
6.3
50.00
4.71
1484
MAR-OCT
315
70
B2-N
NoA
Corn
110
1.07
31.15
3666
MAR-JUN
117.7
70
B2-N
NoA
Wheat
60
2.07
31.15
3869
SEP-APR
124.2
c 70
B2-N
NoA
Soybeans
33
4.00
31.15
4112
JUN-AUG
132
87
O-V
OrB
Corn
120
1.08
14.60
1892
MAR-JUN
129.6
87
O-V
OrB
Wheat
55
2.04
14.60
1638
SEP-APR
112.2
87
O-V
OrB
Soybeans
38
4.00
14.60
2219
JUN-AUG
152
86
W-KK
NoA
Corn
110
1.07
28.00
3296
MAR-JUN
117.7
86
W-KK
NoA
Wheat
60
2.07
28.00
3478
SEP-APR
124.2
86
W-KK
NoA
Soybeans
33
4.00
28.00°'
3696
JUN-AUG
132
86
LL-0'C
LyB
Corn
115
1.08
6.80
845
MAR-JUN
124.2
86
LL-00
LyB
Wheat
60
2.07
6.80
845
SEP-APR
124.2
86
LL-00
LyB
Soybeans
.38
4.00
6.80
1034
JUN-AUG
15?
86
PP-XX
NoA
Corn
110
1.07
17.50
2060
MAR-JUN
117.7
86
86
PP-`:'�X
PP-X
NoA
NoA
Wheat
Soybeans
60
33
2.07
4.00
17.50
17.50
2174
132
SEP-APR
JUN-AUG
124.2
132
Total 200.81 1 36437 lbs.
Available Nitrogen
33810 lbs.
Surplus or deficit
? -2627 lbs.
d
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply
the waste in a timely manner.
t.
,i

Dexter Jackson 1-20
Page 3
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. In the future,
regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that
addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fie:ss (i.e. small grain, etc. interseeded in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through
grazing, hay and /or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they reach a height of six to nine
inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four inches. In fields where small grain
etc. is to be removed for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small :grain to reach materity,
especially late in the season ( i.e. April or May) Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will
definitely interfere with the stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less
Fitrogen being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is the normal
situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or silage
two to three times during the season, depending on the time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc. is late September or early October . Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a height of about two inches before drilling for best
results. E
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying summer annuals under stressed conditions. Nitrate poisoning
may occur in livestock. Sampling forage or hay for nitrate levels is recommended.
, t
Acres shown in the tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding required buffers, filters strips along
ditches, odd areas -` unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving full application rates due to
equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the field listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres
shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
tLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The
sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or
other elements. Ybur production facility will produce approximately 5292 lbs. of plant available
nitrogen per year in the sludge. +
If you remove sludge every 5 years you will have approximately 26460 lbs. of PAN to utilize. Assuming you
apply this PAN to hybrid bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 lbs. per acre you will nee( 88
acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at the rate of 125 lbs. of nitrogen per acre you will need :212
acres of land. Please be aware that these are only estmates of the PAN and theiland needed. Actual
requirements soul . vary by 25% depending on the sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and
application methods.
s
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation such that
runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water
' droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity

Dexter Jackson 1-20 Page 4
of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of
the crop.
If surface irrigation'is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the producer and
irrigation designer;to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrrigate the acres shown in tables.
Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan
invalid. j
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
{
i
Tract No.
Field No.
Soil Type
Crop
Code
Applic.
Rate(in/hr)
Applic.
Amount
c 73
A-131
OrB
CB -Hay
0.50
1.00
70
B2-N
NoA
Corn
0.40
1.00
70
B2-N
NoA
Wheat
0.40
1.00
70
B2-N
NoA
Soybeans
0.40
1.00
8
O-V
OrB
Corn
0.40
1.00
87
O-V
OrB
Wheat
0.40
1.00
87
O-V
OrB
Soybeans
0.40
1.00
86
W-KK
NoA
Corn
0.40
1.00
86
W-KK
NoA
Wheat
0.40
1.00
86
W-KK
NoA
Soybeans
0.40
1.00
86
LL-00
LyB
Corn
0.40
1.00
86
LL-00
LyB
Wheat
0.40
1.00
86
LL-w
LyB
Soybeans
0.40
1.00
86
PP-XX
NoA
Corn
0.40
1.00
86
PP-XX
NoA
Wheat
0.40
1.00
86
PP-XX
NoA
Soybeans
0.40
1.00
M
a
V

Dexter Jackson 1-20 Page 5
1
This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the
croF.is not over applied. In many situations the application amount shown cannot be applied because of the
nitrogen limitations. The maximum application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the
average of once every 6 months. In no instances should the volume of the waste be stored in your structure
be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour
storm.
It is the responsir')ility of the producer and the waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment is operated
properly to apply'ahe correct rates shown in the tables. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of
nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you have receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the
amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to appling the waste.
f.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Pulls-XX are in a two year rotation of Corn, Wheat and Soybeans. The acres are reduced by one-half to allow
for PAN for each'year.
4
a
C
a
T
4

Page 6
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
r
Name of Farm: Dexter Jackson 1-20
Owner/Manager Agreement
1 (we) understand and will follow and.implement the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any
expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)
before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from
this system to the surface waters of the state from a storm -event less severe than the 25-year, 24 hour storm.
The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation
District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Dexter Jackson
?signature: Date:
Name of Manage (If ifferept f om owner) ?
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: G. Glenn Clifton
Affiliation. Prestage Farms, Inc. Phone: [phone]
Address: P.O. Box 438
Clinton, NC 28329
Signature: LU-Date: !15/ 03
a
j

Land owner:
F Irrigation System `
Designation:
Wetted Diameter:
Spacing:
Hydrant Layout:
I
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
Dexter Jackson Facility Number: 31-22
X Existing Irrigation System 'New/Expanding
Irrigation System
300 feet
240 feet
X Multiple Hydrants Single Hydrant
Pull
Number
Lane
5 ac2 ig
Pull
Length
Location
Ext/Int
Middle
Start
End
Stop
End
Total
Acres
A
Single
123
Ext.
0.76
0.77
1.53
B1
Single
389
Ext.
2.41
0.77
3.18
B2
240
287
Ext.
1.78
0.77
2.55
C1
240
265
Ext.
1.64
0.77
1.32
C2
240
222
Int.
1.22
0.73
1.95
k. D1
240
265
7 Int.
1.46
0.73
1.22
D2
240
215
Int.
1.18
0.73
1,91
E1
240
265
Ext.
1.64
0.77
1.32
E2
240
215
Ext.
1.33
0.77
2.10
F
240
505
Ext.
3.13
0.77
3.90
G
240
1011
Int.
5.57
0.73
6.30
H
240
847
Int.
4.47
0.73
5.40
1
240
361
Int.
1.99
0.73
2.72
J
240"
785
Ext.
4.86
0.77
5.64
K
240
1065
Int.
5.87
0.73
6.60
L
245
1365
Int.
7.33
0.73
8.06
M
N
22!'
201
1171
Int.
5.75
0.73
6,48
745
Ext.
4.05
0.77
4.82
O
240
365
Ext.
2.26
0.77
3.03
P
240
465
Int.
2"56
0.73
3.30
Q
240
565
Int.
3.11
0.73
3.84
R
240
591
Int.
3.26
0.73
3.99
S
240
591
Int.
3.26
0.73
3.99
T
240
591
Int.
3.26
0.73
3.99
U
240
315
Ext.
1.95
0.77
2.72
V
Single
591
Ext.
3.66
0,77
4.43
W
220
762
Ext
4.54
0.75
5.29
X
220
789
Int.
3.98
0.69
4.67
Y
220
805
Int.
4.07
0.69
4.76
Z
220
845
Int.
4.27
0.69
4.96
AA
220
800
Int.
4.04
0.69
4.73
BB
220'
715
Int.
3.61
0.69
4.30
CC
220
710
Int"
3.59
0.69
4.28
DD
220
615
Int.
3.11
0.69
3.80
EE
22��
555
Int.
2.80
0.69
3.49
FF
220
500
Int.
2.53
0.69
3.22
GG
220
450
Int.
2.27
0.69
2.96

e
Pull
Number
H H
Lane
Spa,::
2210
Pull
Length
380
Location
Ext/Int
Int.
Middle
1.92
Start
lend
0.69
Stop
End
Total
Acres
2.61
II
220
350
Int.
1.77
0.69
2.46
JJ
220
310
Int.
1.57
0.69
2.26
KK
220
245
Ext
1.46
0.75
2.21
LL
240
287
Ext.
1.78
0.77
2.55
MM
240
459
Int.
2.53
0.73
3.26
NN
240
456
Int.
2.53
0.73
3.26
00
240
690
Int.
3.80
0.73
4.53
PP
240
690
Int.
3.80
0.73
4.53
9,0
240
490
Int.
2.70
0.73
3.43
RR
240
440
Ext.
2.73
0.77
3.50
SS
240
140
Ext.
0.87
0.77
1.64
TT
240
657
Int.
3.62
0.73
4.35
UU
240
557
Int.
3.07
0.73
3.80
VV
240
657
Int.
3.62
0.73
4.35
WW
240
675
Int.
3.72
0.73
4.45
XX
240
675
Ext.
4.18
0.77
4.95
200.89
have measured'each pull and have submitted these measurements for computation.
r
Owner: ' Date: ! - 31-0 3
Dekter Jackson
Computed By: Xfin_., C?(A, Date: 1134103
G. Glenn Cli n
WA-Techn. Specialist
Prestage Farms, Inc.
acres

a
a '
IRRIGATION SYSTEM PARAMETERS
Land Owner: Dexter Jackson Date: 07/31/2003
Address: 814 Country Club Road
Mt. Olive NC 28365 Facility No. 31-22
Telephone: [phone]
County: Duplin
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications
Field No.
and/or
Pull No.
Maximum
Usable
Size of
Pull
Soil Type
Slope
N
Crop(s)
Maximum
Application
Rate
(in/hr)
Maximum
Application
per Irrigation
Cycle
(inches)
A
1.53
OrB
2-6
Bermuda -Hay
0.5
1.0
61
3.18
OrB
2-6
Bermuda -Hay
0.5
1.0
B2
2.55
OrB
2-6
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.5
1.0
i C1
1.32
OrB
2-6
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.5
1.0
C2
1.95
OrB
2-6
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.5
1.0
D1
1.22
OrB
2-6
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.5
1.0
D2
1.91
OrB
2-6
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.5
1.0
E1
1.32
OrB
2-6
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.5
1.0
E2
2.10
OrB
2-6
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.5
1.0
F
3.0
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
G
6.30
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
H
5.40
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
I
2.72
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
J
5.64
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0'
K
6.60
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
L
8.06
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
M
6.48
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
N
4.82
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
O
3.03
OrB
2-6
Corn,.Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
Fj
3.30
OrB
2-6
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
Q
3.84
OrB
2-6
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
R
3.99
OrB
2-6
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
S
3.99
OrB
2-6
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
T
3.99
OrB
2-6
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
U
2.72
OrB
2-6
Corn, Wheat, So beans
0.4
1.0
v
4.43
OrB
2.6
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
W
5.109
NoA
NoA
0-2
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
0.4
1.0
1.0
X
4.67
Y
4.76
NoA
. 0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
Z
4.96
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
AA
4.73
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
BB
4.30
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
CC
4,28
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
DD
3.80
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
EE
3.49
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
FF
3.22
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
GQ?
2.96
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
HH
2.61
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0

Field No.
and/or
Pull No.
Maximum
Usable
Size of
Field
Soil Type
Slope
N
Crop(s)
Maximum
Application
Rate
Maximum
Application
per Irrigation
Cycle
(inches)
If
2.46
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
JJ
2.; 6
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
KK
2.21
NoA
0-2
Corn, Meat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
LL
2.55
LyB
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
MM
3.26
LyB
2-6
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
NN
3.26
L B
2-6
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
00
4.53
LyB
2-6
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
PP
4.53
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
QQ
3.43
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
RR
3.50
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
SS
1.64
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, So beans
0.4
1.0
TT
4.35
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
UU
3.80
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
VV
WW
4.35
4.45
NoA
NoA
0-2
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
(1.4
0.4
1.0
1.0
XX
4.95
NoA
0-2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0.4
1.0
Computed By:
i
fi . Adv - 4C..-
G. Glean Clifton
WA-Techn. Specialist
a

�'�.-.; '�r "=X-Y^�.'i � "�-�r r�"^'�� z- L..^:�••,� ,.+.�-a: � 3t-Y.�-�-�-.v.:':,r -��"'� >_ l.'i=�ir=:� .
. A _ : �. ��}mac [_.--
J.7` -�5-
1."=Z"tiPC�(-��+p�^
[ r.�
�r-.*�..rl�r�- K� 15
-�1'-n l • I,
-d + ,rl _ ,�. -r..- _�� 1-_- ♦'
-_ f - _ _. � �-" .-.4' ���r' J �'. /!�. ll^•k✓-1 wv �. J-..�yy L,Y,=:y�-�YtL� r'i
f.
rl
J-
.. _ rb it _'a
f `,r,�.r.r?f• f' �' � � � �"r r � � ^Y I_
17
IL -
1 w

r��
7?
ANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number /UL Z 31 d LZ County D Vl NL I iV Year 20011'
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate ofr Coverage or Permit) aL ktE K T CKS o
Operator in Charge for this Facility -A ►eH.4&rL- 91 &897� Certification 4 1 p 39Z
Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar e
_,�< YES NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part II and proceed to the certific 20 to
was generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal was andll
DEB 1 8
Part I : Facility Information:
1. Total number of application Fields ❑ or Pulls '(please check the appropriate bo t
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): 5 Total Useable_ Acres approved in the CAWMP
2 oo, 81
2. Total number• of Fields ❑ or Pulls 1< (please check the appropriate box) on which land application
occurred during the year: 51 Total Acres on which waste was applied / 9y 4
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
/ $ 534, 3
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and
the permit: _ 3 40q 3 -7
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken
off site during the year /VON4F tons ❑ or gallons ❑ (please check the appropriate box)
6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
/q,213
7. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year:
Largest 1 �� I l y
Smallest
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals
at the facility is the annual average numbers) �--
8. Facility's Integrator if applicable: ;8re5- `-,a qe i,-M 5
Part II: Facilit)rStatus:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, TIC DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN. CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE. -
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during
the past calendar year.
AFACF 3-14-03
g - Yes ❑ No
r

2. The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year.
.3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past
calendar,year.. _
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage -ponds at this facility during
the' past calendar year. `
S. There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the
levels specified in this facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year.
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year.
❑ Yes ANo
K Yes ❑ No
X Yes ❑ No
Dk Yes []No
R Yes ❑ No
7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon X Yes ❑ No
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume
for which the lagoon was designed. V .
8. A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification. Ayes ❑ No
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the K Yes ❑ No
past calendar year.
10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year? Yes ❑ No
11. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility-'s _. Yes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
13. Crops as specified in the CAWMP were maintained during the past calendar year on all Yes ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were f �, Yes ❑ No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
" i certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
bE xTER JRcK50a O wnV29
Permittee Name and Title (type or print)
q-7- n 5
Date
y-7~o5
Date
(if different from Permittee)
AFACF 3-14-03 2

I
s r • •
� a
I
I
i
V
i
f
i
V
-
IE
I

VEB 1 8 4UUD
Lagoon Stodge survey Form t
Il]
A. Farm Permit or DWO Identification Number
B. Lagoon Idantitrcabor► �t r St3►aiC Sgr=�1 �S� (n
C. Person(s) taking Measurements
D. Date of Measurements
E. Methodsl0evices Used for Measuement of.
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the fop of the sludge layer.
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottam (loll) of lagoon:
c. Thickness of the sludge layer If making a direct measurement with "core sampler'
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at the inside top of bank): _ (acres)
(Draw sketch of lagoon on a separate sheet and list dimensions, and calculate surface area.)
G. Estimate number of samping points:
a. Less than 1.33 acres: Use 8 points
b. ff nwre than 1,33 acres,acres x 6 with maximum of 24.
' (usfng sketch and dimensions. develop a uniform "grid" that has number of Intersection points that match
most closely with the estimated number of sampling points needed. Plumber the grid intersection points on
the lagoon grid to correspond with the data to be recorded for points of measurement)
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data an 'Stodge Survey Data sheer.
I. At the time of sludge survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level
to the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gage pole):
J. Determine distance from Mwdmum Liquid limit to Minimum Liquid Level: .Q ,
(Determine from Plan or other lagoon records)
K. Calculate distance from present liquid surface level to Minimum Liquid
Level: ttamJ - Item 1, assuming present liquid level Is below Max Uq. Level:
1-7
L Record ftm sludge survey data street the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the lagoon bottom (average for ail the ernei%t points):
/ O. 7
M. Record from the sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present Nuld surface level
to the tap of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points):
7 s
N. Record from the sludge survey data sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer.
r Z—
O. Cakutale the thidcnm of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone (item M - item K):
S ,
(Note: If item O is Sass than 4 fL, a sludge removal and utilization plan may be required by
N.C. DWO. See your specific permit or contactEYWO for more information.) .
P. Proceed to the sludge VoMne Worksheet if desire to calculate sludge volume for. ngular shaped
lagoon with uniform side slope.
Completed by- '*Vey 13A?n#6ZLA �i : - Irate: 'Z 2 `7�

r
i-)
Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Lagoon Identification:
Completed By: -
Print Name Signature
3(07�
Date: -O
(A)
Grid
Point
No.
(B)
Distance from liquid surface
to top of sludge
M
Distance from liquid surface
to lagoon bottom (soil)
(D)
Thickness of sludge
la er
Ft. & inches
Feet tenths
Ft. 8 inches
Feet (tenths)
Ft. & inches
Feet (tenths)
2
O
,
3
4
Io. 4
5
.a
6
v:
7
"1
g
{
9
-7
10
11
12
1./
13
L.
14io-77
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Average
* All Grid Points and corresponding sludge laver thickness must be shown on a sketch
attached to this Sludge Survey Data Sheet.
Conversion Table From Inches to Tenths of feet
Inches
Tenths of feet
Inches
Tenths of feet
1
0.1
7
0.6
2.
0.2
8
0.7
3
0.2
9
0.7
4
0.3
10
0.8
5
0.4
11
0.9
6
0.5
12
1.0

mom 0 MINE MMMEM
Ain
0 on I IN
MI

1:9
F EB 1 8 4uuz)
Lagoon Sludge Survey Form
A. Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number 31 - -I
' B. Lagoon Identification
C. Person(s)taking Measurements Trtty ♦ Qd1S
D. Date of Measurements
E. Mat odslDevices Used for Measuement of:
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer.
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (sail) of lagoon:
Po is . u;'th lnea�u rement
c. thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with 'core sampler"
t1j) P
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at the inside top of bank): I, 1 (acres)
(Draw sketch of Lagoon on a separate sheet and list dimensions, and calculate surface area.)
G. Estimate number of sampling points:
a. Less than 1.33 acres: Use 8 polnts
b. if more than 1,33 acres, , acres x 6 = 1Z , with maximum of 24.
(using sketch and dimensions, develop a uniform 'grid' that has number of Irtersedion points that matx h
most closely with the estimated number of sampling points needed. Number the grid intensecfion points on
the lagoon grid to correspond with the data to be recorded for points of measurement)
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data an 'Sludge Survey Data SheeC.
1. At the time of sludge survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level
to the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gage pole):
J_ Determine distance from Maximum Liquid Omit to Minimum Liquid Level: 2.
(Determine from Plan or other lagoon records)
K. Calculate distance from present liquid surface level to Minimum Liquid
Level: [femJ - ftem I, assuming present liquid level is below Max. LLq. Level:_
L. Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the lagoon bottom (average for all the measuement points):
r
M. Record from the sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
��
to the top of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points):
N. Record from the sludge survey data sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer.
`-0
O. Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone (Item M • item K):
q 1 g
(Note: If item Q is less than 4 fL, a sludge removal and utilization plan may be required by
N.C. DWQ. See your specific permit or Contact DWO for more Information.)
P. Proceed to the sludge Volume Worksheet H desire to calculate sludge volume for reetangu%w shaped
lagoon with uniform side slope.
1
ComD#eted by r/�kc A sc bt at. �i,tG !A .�.. Date:
y

t9
Sludge Survey Data Sheet
, Lagoon Identification:
Completed By: pY1C,, � &j,9 ZLI, 1�
Print Name Signature
(3(.77)
-j)cx4c;,r7&-so L-'D)
Date: /.LZ-uy
(A)
Grid
Point
No.
(8}
Distance from liquid surface
to top of slud a
P
Distance from liquid surface
to lagoon ttom (soil)
(D)
Thickness of sludge
lai rer
Ft. & inches
Feet tenths
Ft. & inches
Feet (tenths)
Ft. & inches
Feet (tenths)
1
`5
2
Z
�r
3
4
5
IrS!
6
, -
. e>
7
9
y
8
q,
, x-
9
/
10
916L,
11
12
t91f.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Average
• All Grid Points and correspondina sludge laver thickness must he shown on a sketch
attached to this Sludge Survey Data Sheet.
Conversion Tahle From Inches to Tenths of feet
Inches
Tenths of feet
Inches
Tenths of feet
1
0.1
7
0.6
2
0.2
8
0.7
3
0.2
9
0.7
4
0.3
10
0.8
5
0.4
11
0.9
6
0.5
12
1.0

una�ur
�■■
NE■■Nq■W'•■t■1�■1A„�t■H■,W/■WNi�■N■N■,
NEW■■/■W■■■�■■�n■���■,W,An�%NanH�iii■■��
■■■■■■■■NN■
Nf■,N/N■/,■■W■,,,,,■■NHHH,■■■■■N■N■■W■,/,qW
�■■/■/q,■N■m■NN=,■NH■■H,NANN■■H■W■■//WN�■■■ODS=
�,a„■,■,■N■■q■,W,N■,N■W■■WNN■■■,,,■■Wu
■iN
fNW
tN■Nm
wtmm/ra�w,
raTICAL1r2.ua
■N/■,/W/■/■,■■■u
ME N,■■■■NEEMEMEW
■CAlbre -tilts
■,■q,■N■■/■■,■,■■W,1•■■■,■HNl•■■q,■■■■■■q,/,■■W
N■■,■■W
�m®i■ii
�N■N■
SEE ■■N■Wq■■■W■N■WH■W■■■q/q,N■/NN//W
/■■N■■N■■■/■■„■N,N
Wq,W■,■■qn
uuW■■
W
i■■iii,i
■/,WN■V,NN,W,,W■■■NNgW,■q
N■■,N■mN,
0
i■aiui
■■■■■N■■■
■,N■N/,■,■■■■■N,Wq■,W■
i■o■ia■u■■■�'irn■�■■u�nnu
Wq/N/■„//■,/N■NW■,■■■/■q■H/■■I
■/©■N■■■■N■■W■■■■Ww„/■■■/
■NNn■n��■N/N■n■q■N�,
■■WN
■■■u�u/■■
q
i■i■■,■■�•W�■iq■�m■a�anl
N,■HWNWI•/■,,,■/■I
■
WNN■Wq■,H■■Hi
/■■,N//■■„■■„I
■,,,■q„0■,■I
■
■W,)i■/■q■,■■■nl
•■■H■q,
a■■ ■<rn■■
MIS/,�■ I■I
,■„I
m■m
,ai■■�i,l
■W�m■■q�,�l
MININIS■Wn■WW■■q■Nuq
MLW
N/W■NNNN■,W■q■,■■■/,I
iu■,i
W■NN■N■/■HW,■N■,■■■■■■■I
IRONWORKER
■W■
■■■■■„■■■■N■■W,l•■■,NN■■NW■■/NN■N,■/■■■,■/N■H■■■,I
■N■
ii■a
■■O„m■■
MERE
i/i=i=i■uu
immoomi■■�u■aiINONEM■W■i■/Wiia■Wii■E■W�ii
Nail■Nin■MEN
0N0
■ia■
m■N
u�■i■
V.�l�S■W
N■■
■iiii
IW■■■Nnn,my■,//o■■HN�v■■
NN■■/■■■■,nNN�■v■H■■■/■�■■■�■■///N■■■nHWWORSE
0
®Nv���/q■■,■/■\W
■N�EME
�■/■,■/■,I
q■■■■NIXONnN■W■■r/■i•
�■/�■■N■,■N„mN,mm■ii
�,,W
�■,a,W■■NWN,Ngq■■N■■/W
�,■■■■N■■NNNN■■N■N■■,W■,W
■■■■u,■,//W■■,■a,,,,,,�W,■■„
■HHN■■NNtlNN■,N/NW,/■,NN■
■N■N■/,■■'L/■1■„■■,■■,■,/N■N■■,■/
,■mm 0\Womm�„�■��■■NWN■■■q■,■w■W�/■W,■�W�■�p,■�■B■d�■W��W■�■I
J</W ■,=�,�v/,■/q
mn,l■■,■m,■m,■■N■Iu■Nm,ml
N,,,■N■,ulN■q,■�u■a/■/■■N/Nwl
■NNN■,!'�d�//■,N/NNf■/v■,WHI
/n/1,■�■/■�,Wu■NH
■,■■■■■,N
■
■■■,■■■q■■Wq
■NN■■N■■q■N�■■■■H�,I
q■■/■�q,�
SENSORS
q,■N■/■/N■■///■Nql
W N
■u■■q■■■N
E��l
W q■ W ■N
q■I
H■■■■I
W■,I
■■■■/■, NI
■,I
W■■■
0/�■■q■Wv�
■N�i�■�NpWp■■N■■ii/■�■M■,H■N,
W
■
W
■
W
■
N■,■N■W■N,■WN�■■■N■■■■■N■q■■■H/■■I
Wq■■■■■qN■■■W
W
■
■qN■■nH■nnN■■W■qq
■NNq■■■W■■■■■■NmW■■mN■■■■■
W ■■■/,■■/■■■
WN■■N■■NW■■NN■■q■■N/ql
■„�N■,rrL+7■„N/■■■■W■WWNN
NN■r■//■,■■W■■WWN,■q■■■■/■■■■N■W■n
mmm,/,■W■W,/W■■WNN,Wrn■W■q,■„■N■W■■■■,■■/■■■W/W
■■Nm■N/N,■■■■N■■■,■N,■■■NNrnN■NNWW■■N■■■W
NN■■q■■■■/■■■■■NW■
W W
N■ W
NN■m■N■■■N,■/■■NNNNN,■Nq■N■■H■
W■,■//NNN■
■rn,N■■
WN,NW■,N■■■■■■■,■■■■■■■„■■■„Nq■HW/■■■B/■■I
IN-NWN■NNW/„W■N
�Nm■NN■NNNNNW
I�■■W■N■/■„■�■,��■■,■■N■■■NNW
Room
on
■
W
■■W
NN■■■N■■■,■
■■■■■■■■■N■■■■,■■,■■■■N■■■■■H■■■N■N■■I
,NNNW,WW■,■/■■,■gNW�■I
W■N■■■,N■■N■■N■Wq■W■■■I
q■„N■„��W■avv,W■■■■■a,■a■■�1�„N■■�■N/�■N■
INa
■■mmammm■,N■■mN/■■W■NWN■■■NN■■/■q,N
ommomms
W■NNm/■N■■/,■„■NNN■,■NN/■■■,W,,,,,■N■NW■■■,,,■■■■■Wl•■I
,N■a■■■■N/■aNN■NNWNNN■,■W/N■/,■�NNN,■■■�N/
NNmNN■■N/NN■/■■■®W■W■■■■■■N■N■■■■,N,■■■,■W
WN/■m■■■m■
N■■N/NNNNNN,■■„
■■■Vu■��,uav�uW■W■�■�■��■�N�n���
N■■■,■■■■WN■N■■■N■■■/■,I
W�■��■■N:■��:■I
■N/��
■qWN■■,I
NNn■W■■,■N■Nm
�■a/■Ha
N■NNNm■W
�N,N,■■NN,■■■■,■a■N■,N■■„W,■■/■■■■/■NNN,■■N■■■I
m■W■WN,■W,a■,H■W■■■N■„■■/„Nq/■■N■W,■■)•,l
��■m■Wm
NlE■©m%■■�N
WHERE
�,■//■/m■N■
aum>nWWW,■N■N■
mammon
■
--mono
mN■N,■N■mN■■m■Nmq■W■,N■WSW■■■■,NNN■■/,,,/,■■,■q■,■■■■■■■,■■I
��iii�,Niiugi■iN■n
//■■■■i■iui,Ni■NN■■■�q■i■■„Nii�iii�mi�
■N■■„/,■■■■W■
NmW,
,Nm■N■NmmmN■NN■■N/■■■■,N■N■■,■■■N■N,N■/■■■■N■■■■,■/■■I
�:/■�u■■N■■■■
IMMIii
nv
W,gR■WW■,■NN■,WNN■■■■■W
a
Nmnmarnu
a■q�auu,�
aW�N■■,Ni■/
N■N■N//■/m,N/,■■■■/,■■/W■N/■N
■N■iiii■u■■■■iui■/■wi■i■ui//iti■�ii=i�iiiiiai■uiioii■
u�i�ii�uWi■iiaNni■iiiuiiiiiiim
■�::�:��iiii,■i/Nii/Wi■iiiumlom
W,,,,■,■W■■■■/W
SEEM]
W>■,I
ni,�i
ii
■
■u/i■ii■Niaiiiuiu
u�niiw
HaaNN/■
■WNW■■®■NN=N■■■■■/■■W
Wq
NN■■■W■
/�■/�■■W/
BUSINESS
HOME
W,NWwNN■NN,■■■
W■,N]SEEM
MEMOW
W■..�-=E=EMEE■■umm���0Emi
■N■■NaUNmNN
i'i■■iown
■■/■■,■■I•ml
�ii/Nii,i
NNW■
!NUMBERS
Hq■■gN■■NNWH■,N
■W■■■■
N■N■W■N
W■
,■■■■■
w■■NWN,■W/N■I•■■■N■■�■,■■■/■■W■I•>!I
■WW//„/,NSWNN
■■NW■■■■/,■■■/■■/Nq■„qN■W/
,NW■NHN■NNW,WN■■NW■NN/W,N/■I
N■HN■W■NWNN■■■■NW■,■NNE

Lagoon Sludge Survey Form
A. Farm Permit or DWQ identification Number
• S. Lagoon Identification
C. Person(s) taking Measurements e.:)/ o-
D. Date of Measurements - Z Z'v V
E. Met iodslDevioes Used for Measuement of:
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer.
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soli) of lagoon:
201E LA.;Ith MPD5Urement
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler"
-T P
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at the inside top of bank): :,% `� (acres)
(Draw sketch of lagoon an a separate sheet and list dimensions. and calculate surface area.)
G. Estimate number of sampling points:
a. Less than 1.33 acres: Use 8 points
i b, ff more than 1.33 acres, 2,073 acres x 6 = j y _ , with maximum of 24.
(using sketch and dimensions. develop a uniiam "grid' that has number of intersection points that match
most closely with the estimated number of sampling points needed. Number the grid Intersec.tim points on
the lagoon grid to correspond with the data to be recorded for points of measurement.)
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Sheet'.
1. At the time of sludge survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level
to the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gage pole): J. Determine distance from Max in- um Liquid limit to Minimum Liquid Level: O�
(Determine from Plan or other lagoon records)
K. Calculate distance from present liquid surface level to Minimum Liquid
Level: ItemJ - item 1, assuming present liquid level Is bektw Max Uq- Level:
.,
L. Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the lagoon bottom (average far all the measuement points):
l 3 S
M. Record from the sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the top of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points):
Q,
N. Record from the sludge survey data sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer.
—.St•�7
O. Calculate the thickness of the existing Uctuld Treatment Zone (Rent M - Rem K):
G a —
(Note: if Item O Is less than 4 fL, a sludge removal and utilization plan may be required by
N.C. DWQ. See your specific permit or contact DWQ for more Information.)
P. Proceed to the stodge Voksme Wortcsheet If desire to calculate sludge volume for rec>enguler shaped
lagoon with uniform side slope.
Camptetsd by: QG� 1 Date:
'ZZ fl

Sludge Survey Data Sheet
i� Lagoon Identification:
Completed By: 31451 L]"LWwt ZZ,
Print Name Signature
J
Date: / - Z.Z.-4'/
(A)
Grid
Point
No.
(B)
Distance from liquid surface
to top of sludge
P
Distance from liquid surface
to lagoon ttom (soil)
(D)
Thickness of sludge
la or
Ft. & inches
Feet (tenths)
Ft. & inches
Feet (tenths)
Ft. & inches
Feet (tenths)
2
,t7
3
,LIC
4
bAD
L
5
6
7
9
10
,'7
11
Ir
-7
12
1
.1
13
.t,.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Average
(o � O
All Grid Points and corresponding sludge laver thickness must be shown on a sketch
attached to this Sludge Survey Data Sheet.
Conversion Table From Inches to Tenths of feet
Inches
Tenths of feet
Inches
Tenths of feet
1
0.1
7
0.6
2
0.2
8
0.7
3
0.2
9
0.7
4
0.3
10
0.8
5
0.4
11
0.9
6
0.5
12
1.0

e.,
y
9
Lagoon Sludge Survey Form 1
A. Fart Permit or DWQ Identification Number .3
B. Lagoon Identification LallQr p^v J(i7
C. Persoo(s) taking Measurements j�J4C s� S
D. Date of Measurements 1-*rL -Oq
E. McVxxWDevtces Used for Measuement of -
VEB-1 8 �UUD
MR
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer.
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soli) of lagoon:
P-OOle- i-A;rth rneauremen-
sh Thickness Of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler'
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at the inside top of bank): 3-4- _ __ -(acres)
(Draw sketch of lagoon on a separate sheet and fist dimensions, and calculate surface area_)
G. Estimate number of sampling points:
a. Less than 1.33 acres: Use 8 points
b. If more than 1.33 acres, 31q � acres x 6 with matdmum of 24.
(using sketch and dimensions, develop a uniform "grid" that has number of Intersection points that match
most closely with the estimated number of sampling points needed. Number the grid Intersection points on
the lagoon grid to correspond with the data to be recorded for points of measurement.)
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Sheet'.
f. At the time of sludge survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level
to the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gage pole): j•
J. Determine distance frorn Ma*mum LkW limit to Mlnlmum UpAd Level: 2, f7
(Detwmine from Plan or other lagoon records)
K. Calculate distance from present liquid surface level to Minimum Liquid
Item 1, liquid level Is below Max Uq. Level:
j
"7
Level: ItemJ - assuming present
.
L. Record from sludge survey data sheet the dtstanoe from Vw present liquid surface level
to the lagoon bottom (average for all the measuement points):
�• j
M. Record from the'sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
/
to the top of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement paints):
l0
N. Record from the sludge survey data sheet the avers" thickness of the sludge layer.
#77
O. Calculate the thickness of the erdsting Liquid Treatment Zone (Rom M - item K):
v
(Note: If Item O Is less than 4 ft., a sludge removal and utilization plan may be required by
N.C. DWQ. See your specific permit or contact DWQ for snore Information.)
P. Proceed to the sludge Volume Worksheet If desire to calculate sludge volume for rectangular shaped
tag" with uniform side slope.
Completed by: 7 qc•` 8J4Tt'W t 4WL S40, 2 am—&L r Date:
j-tL-ay

Sludge Survey Data Sheet]
Lagoon Identification: �2C 66 o
Completed By: r r _8G �,� _ Date: /�LX -044
Print Name Signature
(A)
Grid
Paint
No.
(B)
Distance from liquid surface
to top of stud a
(C)
Distance from liquid surface
to lagoon bottom (soil)
(D)
Thickness of sludge
layer
Ft. & inches
Feet (tenths)
Ft. 8, inches
Feet tenths
Ft. 8, inches
Feet (tenths)
1
Cr % 1
.?-
,
z
9, o
3
Lis-
4
5
6
r
7
7..
8
2jQ
9
L. 4
') .
10
Z
11
xy
12
Lill
13
.i
14
4
,`
15
G•S
!
. ,
16
r
!
17'
L.
O
18
19
,
20
21
22
23
24
Average
,
s All Grid Points and corresponding sludge layer thickness must be shown on a sketch
attached to this Sludge Survey Data Sheet.
Conversion Tahle From Inches to Tenths of feet
Inches
Tenths of feet
Inches
Tenths of feet
1
0.1
7
0.6
2
0.2
8
0.7
3
0.2
9
0.7
4
0.3
10
0.8
5
0.4
11
0.9
6
0.5
12
1.0

i■i■■ii■u■Ems
uMESONS i■iiiniuMi■ii■ns
ON i■ii■�i E■
u HHIu
■■■■/!■■■■■■
■ MEEEM■NME■■■■/■■■■■■■■■■
■/■■■aunt■■■■mERIM
■■K!/EN■s/E■W■MS!
■■W ■■■■W■�■Wmm
■W■WN■■■■BSEEK■
■!mt ■trat!N■!■tt■!■■■■N■■
H■!■■■!■■■!■■■■■f�
lEMseE■■■1MEMii
■■■■HNC■
NEW■■A/
■q■■■H■■■■H
i�s■tm ,MN■MN
■■■■/■
■■
tRsii■' ssn■■si
EWE■■■/NE■M■!■EK
SOME"
■■EMOMI
�om�0nn"■O�SUMOMEN
■s■■■!■■■!■■■■ ■Hs/■/■!
■EWEMMM■■■■ NMEMEE/K!
KNM!■MEN E■EEMNE■KW■Ew
Mn■■MME■■■■ EE
■!s■■IMERIM
KEEN B'EEH■■EM■n■■■W■■■■
■o■■■■■WW
m�i'M'E'E■
NVEN■aMm
BE omN�H■■■■!u■N■
■�■�M■■tE!■■nW�■/■t■■
! NnNN
■NE■■■s■■■!s■■■■N■■s■■■■■■■■rns■■
■EME n ■■EEM
N
■■■E■■HH/ ■ ■■■■!■■/!■uW■■!■
■'■'■■■�■■M�H■'/
C.:ii�■■s■N■■■■■■■W■■■■N■■■MOMS
■
t�E■M
ESE N■■■■■■rn■rn■■■■■■■■■s■u■s■■■W■■■■■■
N'i■O'H��■■���v■�"N
N■■ ■M
�■ ■■®WEEK■
MK
■ ■■ ■■NE■■SNME■
nm
■WW■■■■■s■■■W■
'"■■■■■'�'■■H■■■■i�■W'■m'H■■ '■■H HAY
■
N ENW■
nN■�■ N■'■m■■n!■SEEM■■■■■
■■■■■■
sou
■■■
■�H
■MtiE■■KM■E
■■NNMENE■■KN■■©
Hi■ili-----
'Mii■u/
■NuEmma
—ME
W!
■■■■■■■■E
■■■■/■■■
■N/■■■■■iW
=EME■■Krn■K
!■■MN■KEN■■
■■ H�NOMNq■■NK
NN�i�i■■K■iE■/L■■KKKNN■iW■i,N■W1/■■irEsdiEE■K■U■K!
■■NMEK■■■■K■N■■■■■KKENNN■■■KKnEA■■N■■KNNKEKEK■K/
MENNEMSNNWE■■■N■■EKEWNEMKKE■EWW■E■EE
EEm■Em■■■EKE■KE■KK■EmENWKKa■n■NK■sE■■NSN■■s■s■E■EEn■■■Es■E■
HENMNSE■■K■E//EK■EK■SEEK■NN/■EE■EE■■KEKEE■E■EE■N■■■�■E■■■E��EK■■Es■■
aui"
omNEiiWdi
�EEE■EE_ EiW■MnNmE■WMEsEW�
NE
MKNWN■MM
■KMMMEN■
��MW!�
■E�
E■
0
WON
■■K■■KNNIK�■RMIS
■■/EHKK■■EMM■NN■■■H■K■■N■■
■■■■■■■N■■■■■■■N■■■■■■■W■■■■■■W■■■■W■■
NEE a am
RXN■n7■ MEN r7W1L7
■■SEEK■■■ss■■■t�■■■/!■■■Wi�■■Ni■■■ii■■s■■■■■■■■/W
■■■WKK/■■E■■■■NN■■■K■E■E■EE■■■■/KK■■K
WKN■K■■■
MESONS- gnomon
W WMESSNE■�■■E■EEWE
i■%MEHMEKEEMM�
om■■i■
ME
aWMWwas
/■uE■irnME
W/
iu�i■■�uNENiiN�EisiiKiEiNiu■KiuM"u�■iiiuu
i�iirn'iirn'
iME/
N"■
i
m�OEMnO
m®
MOSI�mmWo■M■SEEM
MEESE]
MME
Emmi
MOVES
■N■
■dso
MEMORIES
i H■s■■
MEN ©KEEN■■■
■ ■■\KKK■E!EKE
KE■■E■■N■NKKN■KW■C
RESUME
RESUME =a-
■EN■W■E■■/ME
mor-m■■■■■/■■E■■■K
■ia■■■EKE■KNEE
mmmKsE■■E■/■KNKKKMom
K■®■NEEEu■/■EK■EKa
E■KEca,R3.M M
EXIM
iiK"'in
■KEEi■■s
KmKiRE■■EN■UMMI
■■MEMI
■rnME MEMMEl■rnME■BE■E
N'N'gii■■■nEr
ME an
■N
NMM
]NEEi■mM
E sEE
uO■IMKOOMRa=KWONEKMEESEME so
i"'iNsHsiiiVimKEi�Mm�s�EKKMNEE■■■�■NM
■WEMMMES
EiMISMi�EEEuSE■NtaE'iW
■n■=a
'�i
W
awEEMEESEE■
_EMIUMMEMM■■■
sEM
MM-
ENINS
■■
■M
■mrn■rnMEESE
■ BOOM
MEMOME■
■Mu:
m
MEWE■
KsKNN■MWKEm■EM
N
N
/W■■■■n
E■/■■■■u
■NEE
■ Ki�■'EKEE■n�"SE
u
N■MNn
■ E
a
on
M■■■N
N■E
N■■
NSii■■rn■N■■�■NE'N■■N"
■K
■
i
i'�EK■WKEWNinEm
Esi
■K■'■i
i
EK
WEKENEKEH■■KN■■EE■■EK■NE■N//E■K■■H■■OEE/■E■■E■K■■■■!■■■gsKE■K
M■NE
SK!■ENMNE■■■
■NENEW■■K■E■N■/■E■KEKENNNW■KWE
■■K!
■■■!
■EnuN■■■■EE■■E■■■/■■■KEE■E■■WNK■K■N■NEKK■EEE■■■■■�rnEs■"E%
■NMMEMMMMMSEWEME■K■K■EEEE■■■■
■SEEKNN■
"'n"
■■■Ei■E
■s■lNENE'■■■�niKEKn■■■.
�mri
s■
ErnM■ENNMENKNUM
■■NKKNUEENMNa
NEM■
■SU■
WaE�MKUiNK■isN:i'N■�i■E
O
MWW■WMNNEM■
iMN'
N■■
"ii�
SOME
MNWN■
EN■■E�■M
EMMMEM
WE■MWErnN■
i'N'W■rnM■"MiEKi
"i%EE■u■uNnKM■iMi■n�"E�EEE■
SE
NE
i■"mouN
■E■E■E■
SEEM
a
NE

O W A r�9
Michael F. Easley, Governor
QG
`Ot
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
October 18, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7002 1000 0005 2390 0911
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. William Dexter Jackson
Dexter Jackson Farm
814 Country Club Rd.
Mt. Olive, NC 28365
Subject: Notice of Violation and Recommendation for
Enforcement
Dexter Jackson Farm
Facility Number: 31-22
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Jackson:
This is to notify you of violations to Swine Waste Management System General NPDES Permit
NCA200000 issued on April 9, 2003•under Certificate of Coverage NCA231022.
On September 20, 2004, Mr. Cobb responded to a complaint of waste ponding and running off
into a road ditch along SR1417 (four -lane road that connects Interstate 40 to Bypass 117, north
of Faison, NC). Upon arrival at the location of the complaint, Mr. Cobb observed waste in the
roadside ditch and waste ponding at the edge of a sprayfield adjacent to the road ditch. Once
the sprayfield was identified as of a part the Dexter Jackson Farm, Mr. Cobb conducted an
inspection of the sprayfield. The next day, Mr. Cobb performed a follow up inspection. From
the inspections, the following violations were noted:
1) Discharge of animal waste
On September 20, 2004, Mr. Cobb observed where animal waste had run off a
sprayfield and discharged into a roadside ditch. The discharge to the ditch was
estimated to be a few hundred gallons.
This is in violation Condition No. I. 1. of the NPDES Permit that states in part, "Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface waters or wetlands is prohibited except as
otherwise provided in this permit and associated statutory and regulatory provisions.
Waste shall not reach surface waters or wetlands by runoff, drift, manmade conveyance,
direct application, direct discharge or through ditches not otherwise classified as state
waters..."
N%, Carolina
�atura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Phone [phone] Customer Service
Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington, NC 28405 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recydedl10% Post consumer Paper

Mr. Jackson
Page 2 of 4
October 18, 2004
2) Waste ponding and runoff
On September 20, 2004, Mr. Cobb observed where animal waste had been applied to
the field through two traveling gun systems and where waste was running off the land
application area towards the southeast comer of the field. Some of the ponded waste
had run down to the roadside ditch. The majority of the waste runoff appeared to be
coming from the area identified as Pull Q. It appeared that the waste application was too
heavy considering the slopes of the field (see photo 1). Also, it was noticed that the reel
located at Pull Q was set on L-1 position (see photo 2). When Mr. Cobb questioned the
operator in charge, Mr. Gilbert, the following day, he stated that the reel for Pull Q was
initially set up in the H-1 position and that upon noticing the ponded waste he increased
the speed of the reel by going to the H-2 position. There are some discrepancies
between what was observed on September 20, 2004 and what was stated the following
day..
This is in violation of Condition No. 11. 4 of the NPDES Permit that states, "Land
application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the Plant Available Nitrogen rate for the receiving crop. In no
case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff during any
given application event."
In response to this violation, this office must receive the following information within
fifteen (15) working days of the receipt of this notice:
a. A written explanation of the violations.
b. A written description of the actions taken or to be taken to bring the violations back
into compliance and to prevent their recurrence.
c. Information concerning the reels such as the calibration report, ring size used for
applications, and manufacturer's performance charts.
You may wish to contact your County Soil & Water Conservation District Office, County
Extension office, a qualified technical specialist, and/or a professional engineer for any
assistance they may be able to provide.

Mr. Jackson
Page 3 of 4
October 18, 2004
Be advised that this office is considering recommending assessment of civil penalties to
the Director of the Division of Water Quality for the above noted violations. These
violations may result in civil penalties of up to $25,000 per violation in accordance with
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A(a)(2). You may also be assessed for
reasonable costs of the investigation in accordance with North Carolina General Statute
143-215.3(a)(9). Your response will be forwarded to the Director along with the
enforcement package for his consideration. Be advised that the Division of Water
Quality may take further action in this matter including injunctive relief and permit
revocation.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call Mr. Chester
Cobb at 910-395-3900 ext. 226 or Mr. Steve Lewis at 919-715-6629.
Sin rely,
Char es F. ehman, Ph.D., P.G.
Environmental Regional Supervisor
cc: Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Glenn Clifton, Prestage Farms
John College, DSWC-WiRO
Keith Larick, APS Central Files
DWQ Wilmington Animal Files 31-22
S:IWQSIANIMALSIDUPLIN12004131-22 NOVRFE

-: sr;J'� ~�� ��yc��`' �L�!��t�'�27►� 1 �` " r _ 'S - ..;�' r [y:�,�-��.-.�yJ�- � y1}]�j.
-Yz qr �5.,,. '•,'.y�.r� .y-ry-, �!.-Y '. :rye ��. _ ` _.��-�i 1 �" ;r ' ..� �f mil'
r :r° iF�� %;.:,;` •'T-�l.t� 2r�i�%=.T--m '-���"�'c'r •.i �—'.�♦ i�°�"^^,,, �•.3i�'t-.�j fi�--•-.:�4f
4A
.%�S„�,r%�y�- �` '� .� ���'I�' q`y�`",� .��- � �! ? rya► •'.!y "
}' ♦ t '[� �• d.. , •;� ter_ ' �:� "JV•� � ..-

C/
r-
2a
ANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM
Certificate of Coverage or Permit NumberKQ3 1e2 2 County 13 V^P" N Year 200.3
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) br7�TER
Operator in Charge for this Facility ACOE�1; 1Lgj;RT Certification 4
)939a:
Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year
iC YES NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part II and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste
was generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
PartI : Facifity Information:
1. Total number of application Fields ❑ or Pulls.% (please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): ;Eli Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
2. Total number of Fields ❑ or Pulls 0 (please check the appropriate box) on which land application
occurred during the year: 51 Total Acres on which waste was applied „200.
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
/�Ps5 3t/r113-7
4. Total pounds of PIant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and
the permit: 33*17 319Y 37
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken
off site during the year _ Ae/me f tons ❑ or gallons ❑ (please check the appropriate box)
6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
i 3910 - 7mvw-45
7. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility'at any one time during the previous year:
Largest /l qqj
Smallest 5,1Z
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals
at the facility is the annual average numbers)
8. Facility's Integrator if applicable: 14gof r<I4'r 0 -'wgm5
Part II: Facility Status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
AFACF 3-14-03

2_ The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from
Xyes ❑ No
the'facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year.
3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past
�' Yes ❑ No
calendar year.
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during
)(Yes ❑ No
'the past calendar year.
5. There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the
Yes ❑ No
levels specified in this facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year.
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year. Yes ❑ No
7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon Yes ❑ No
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume
for which the lagoon was designed.
8. A copy of the Annual Sludge SurveyForm for this facility is attached to this Certification. ❑ Yes �' No
Sl tip6fa� s �.s?vey D sa7 «' V-2i/-OV
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the Yes ❑ No
past calendar year.
10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year?
I,$ Yes ❑ No
11. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the iacility's,
Yes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during
XYes ❑ No
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
13. Crops as specified in the CAWMP were maintained during the past calendar year on all
KYes ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were
�, Yes ❑ No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
"1 certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
PL,X7FI{ 7&,, 5OA1 / 0WA4--g
Permittee Name and Title (type or print)
ignature 6f P9f nittee
C.
Signature of Operator in C h
(if different from Permittee)
)Iz 0q
Dat
z z� oq
Date -
AFACF 3-14-03 2

State of North Carolina IT
Department of Environment 0 Yw
and Natural Resources�ECEI1DA&4012
J U L 0 12000
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governo BY.
IN
Bill Holman, Secretary -- -- --
CDENR
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
July 3, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
William Dexter Jackson
Dexter Jackson Farm
814 Country Club Rd
Mt. Olive NC 28365
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Dexter Jackson Farm
Facility Number 31-22
Duplin County
Dear William Dexter Jackson:
A letter dated January 15, 1999 was sent to advise you about concerns associated with Certified Animal
Waste Management Plans and the method by which the irrigated acres within the plans were calculated. Only
the acres that are wetted can be credited in the waste management plan as receiving waste application. Any
acreage within the plan that can not be reached by waste application equipment can not be used as part of your
plan.
An evaluation by Patrick Fussell on 6/8/99 was made to review the actual number of acres at your facility
that receive animal waste during land application. The evaluation of your facility has yielded one of the
following two results as indicated by the box marked with an "X".
Category 1:
The evaluation of your facility could not be completed due to a lack of information. Please
contact your Technical Specialist to assist in providing Patrick Fussell the necessary
information to potentially exempt your facility from undergoing a complete wettable acre
determination. Please submit this information to Patrick Fussell, at 127 Cardinal Drive
Extension, Wilmington, NC 28404, within in 90 days of the receipt of this letter. If you have
any questions please contact Patrick Fussell at [phone]. if within 90 days you are
unable to provide Patrick Fussell with the information you are automatically required
to complete a Wettable Acre Determination as described by Category 2 below, within
180 days of receipt of this letter.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Category 2:
❑ Your facility has been identified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
as a facility that may have overestimated the number of acres actually receiving animal
waste. Therefore, some or all of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates
set in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated Technical Specialist to have him
or her conduct a Wettable Acre Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must
be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to conduct
Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialist with the N.C. Cooperative Extension
Service, the Soil and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and the Division of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System must be made and
the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be returned to DWO within the next
180 days. If the needed modifications are not made and if the form is not returned within the
required time, DWQ will be forced to take appropriate enforcement actions to bring this facility
into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty assessments, permit revocation,
and/or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of the attached Wettable
Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the address listed on the form. Please
note that both the owner and the Technical Specialist must. sign the certification. A copy of all
the Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste Utilization Plan
must be kept at your facility. DWQ and the Division of Soil & Water Conservation Staff will
review all documentation during their annual visit of your facility. An additional copy must by
kept on file at the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office. Please note that if you install
or modify your irrigation system, a designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer
must also sign the Wettable Acre Determination Certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sonya Avant of our
Central Office staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
, Z�� '��
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File

31 -2.Z
March 22, 2000
NCDENR
DWQ
Mr. Stony Mathis
127 North Cardinal Dr.
Wilmington NC 28405
Dear Mr. Mathis:
This is to notify you of my plan of action in dealing with the notice of deficiency that I
received.
1. I plan to pump the lagoon down to a level where the repairs to the inside wall can be
made.
2. Glenn Clifton at Prestage Farms will locate on my farm suitable material to be placed
in the eroded areas and supervise the repair job.
3. Floyd Adams professional engineer with The Adams Co. will inspect the repair and
certify it.
If you have any questions give Glenn a call at 910-592-4776 ext. 249.
Sincerely,

ii
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
•
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
NCIDENFR
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Ncom-" CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NAZrURAL.. Re5OURCES
Division of Water Quality
March 8, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL # Z 418 221 343
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. William D. Jackson
Dexter Jackson Farm
814 Country Club Road
Mt. Olive, NC 28365
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Dexter Jackson Farm
Facility Number: 31-22
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Jackson:
This is to notify Mr. William D. Jackson, who holds a non -discharge permit for an animal waste
disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0200 and North Carolina G.S. 143.215.1, of deficiencies of
Animal Waste Permit AWS310022.
On August 11,1999,1 inspected your animal operation and the lagoon(s) serving this operation. The
following deficiencies were noted during the inspection:
Severe Erosion on Inner Wall (> than 12" deep)
During the inspection it was observed that severe erosion was occurring on the inner dike wall of Lagoon D.
Areas on inner walls must be filled and packed with a suitable clay material if lined, then re -vegetated if
above the required freeboard level. If the erosion may have compromised a clay liner (>151, then the
damage must be investigated by a professional engineer. Appropriate repairs must be made under their
guidance and a signed/stamped report certifying the integrity of the liner submitted to DWQ. During the visit,
it was observed that the erosion was far greater than 15" deep, therefore, a professional engineer must be
consulted. Repairs to this structure must be completed by July 1, 2000.
To correct this deficiency, please submit a detailed Plan of Action to the Wilmington Regional
Office of the Division of Water Quality that describes the actions to be taken to address this deficiency of
Animal Waste Permit AWS310022.
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. William D. Jackson
March 8, 2000
Page 2
The proposed written plan of action must be received by this office within fifteen (15) working
days of the receipt of this notice. Upon approval and implementation of the plan, you must notify this
office when the corrective actions are complete. Contact your Service Company, county Soil & Water
district office, or county extension office for any assistance they may be able to provide.
If the deficiency is not corrected, the Division of Water Quality may issue a Notice of Violation
and pursue additional actions including civil penalties, injunctive relief, or revocation of your Animal
Waste Permit AWS310022_
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to contact either Mr.
Mathis or Mr. Dean Hunkele at (910)-395-3900.
Sincerely,
Stonewall Mathis
Environmental Engineer
cc: Harold Jones, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation
Glenn Clifton, Prestage Farms
DWQ Non -Discharge Operations Branch File
DWQ Wilmington Animal Files 31-22
SAWQSIGreer\Drafts131-22 NOD.doc

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
•
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
NCE)ENR
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
NORTH C^ROLINA DERARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NsvuRAL REsouRCES
Division of Water Quality
March 8, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL # Z 418 221 343
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. William D. Jackson
Dexter Jackson Farm
814 Country Club Road
Mt. Olive, NC 28365
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Dexter Jackson Farm
Facility Number. 31-22
Dupiin County
Dear Mr. Jackson:
This is to notify Mr. William D. Jackson, who holds a non -discharge permit for an animal waste
disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0200 and North Carolina G.S. 143.215.1, of deficiencies of
Animal Waste Permit AWS310022.
On August 11,1999,1 inspected youranimal operation and the lagoon(s) serving this operation. The
following deficiencies were noted during the inspection:
Severe Erosion on Inner Wall (> than 12" deep)
During the inspection it was observed that severe erosion was occurring on the inner dike wall of Lagoon D.
Areas on inner walls must be filled and packed with a suitable Gay material if lined, then re -vegetated if
above the required freeboard level. If the erosion may have compromised a clay liner (>15"), then the
damage must be investigated by a professional engineer. Appropriate repairs must be made under their
guidance and a signed/stamped report certifying the integrity of the liner submitted to DWQ. During the visit,
it was observed that the erosion was far greater than 15" deep, therefore, a professional engineer must be
consulted. Repairs to this structure must be completed by July 1, 2000.
To correct this deficiency, please submit a detailed Plan of Action to the Wilmington Regional
Office of the Division of Water Quality that describes the actions to be taken to address this deficiency of
Animal Waste Permit AWS310022.
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. William D. Jackson
March 8, 2000
Page 2
The proposed written plan of action must be received by this office within fifteen (15) working
days of the receipt of this notice. Upon approval and implementation of the plan, you must notify this
office when the corrective actions are complete. Contact your Service Company, county Soil & Water
district office, or county extension office for any assistance they may be able to provide.
If the deficiency is not corrected, the Division of Water Quality may issue a Notice of Violation
and pursue additional actions including civil penalties, injunctive relief, or revocation of your Animal
Waste Permit AWS310022.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to contact either Mr.
Mathis or Mr. Dean Hunkele at (910)-395-3900.
Sincerely,
Stonewall Mathis
Environmental Engineer
cc: Harold Jones, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation
Glenn Clifton, Prestage Farms
DWQ Non -Discharge Operations Branch File
DWQ Wilmington Animal Files 31-2-2
S:IWQSIGreer\Draftsl31-22 NOD.doc

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
November 3, 2000
Prestage Farms, INC.
ATTN: Mr. Glenn Clifton
P.O Box 438 (28329-0439)
4651 Taylor's Bridge Road
Clinton, NC 28328
Dear Mr. Clifton,
1�•
NCDENR
NoR i4 CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
I have just a few questions regarding Mr. Dexter Jackson's wettable acre exemption process:
The information your company sent to me has a few things I need to clear up. Once these .
questions have been cleared up, I will be glad to exempt Mr. Dexter Jackson's farm 01-22 .
Dexter Jackson Farm) from wettable acres. �,.
Dealing with the Waste Plan:
1.) I could not find any explanation for "*" in the table on page 21 of the waste.
plan.
2.) Pulls (A, B1, B2) are written with 13.2 acres in the waste plan, but the irrigation
parameters are written for 726 acres.
3.) Pulls (C2, D2, E2) are written with 13.2 acres. in the waste plan, but the irrigation
parameters are written for 5.96 acres.
Dealing with the Farm Map showing Mr. Jackson's pulls:
1.) The pull length shown or. -the map for each pull, does not match the pull length
written in the irrigation parameters. (Example: Pull (PP)- 810ft map, 675ft, ip)
Please give me some information regarding these questions. I am sure there is a simple
explantion regarding my concerns. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
po(�— �z . -
Patrick Fussell
Environmental Specialist R
cc.Dexter Jackson
DWQ
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
William Dexter Jackson
Dexter Jackson Farm
814 Country Club Rd
Mt. Olive NC 28365
Dear William Dexter Jackson:
A
0 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OE
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 31-22
Duplin County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, TM, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLURi, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water'operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext_ 571.
;2,�
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
16I7 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

�T1,&E
Plan Amendment to Include S&WCC Chronic Rainfall Practices and Standards through March 311, 2000
1. if this facility can comply with its existing permit and CAWMP it must do so.
2. Temporary Addition of New Spray6elds (*) (ChecTc appropriate boxes.)
(] A. acres of cropland. list crop types used:
Q B. acres of hardwood woodland Q 100 lbs PAN / acre added.
0 C. acres of pine woodland added aQ 60 lbs PAN / acre added.
3. Summer Perennial Grass (Check appropriate box.)
Aj} A —Application window extended for 31.8 acres of perennial grass until first killing frost.
0 B. An additional 50 lbs of PAN applied to acres of perennial grass prior to killing frost.
4. PAN Application Increased for Small Grains & Winter Grasses to be harvested_ (Check appropriate box.)
,a -A- PAN application increased up to 200 lbs per acre for �90 acres of small grains or winter grasses to be harvested.
0 B. PAN application increased up to 150 lbs per acre for acres of overseeded summer perennial included in 3. B.
5. Waste Analysis (Check appropriate box.)
[] A. Prior to December 1s, 1999 the calculation of PAN will be based on a 35% reduction of the last analysis taken
prior to the first 25 year 24 hour storm event (Current waste analysis must be used after Dec.I
P4.'Use current waste analysis to determine PAN.
6. Required - Maximum Nitrogen Utilization Measures for Small Grains and Winter Grasses.
A. Use of higher seeding rates,
B. Timely harvest of forage to increase yield, and
C. Irrigating ducting periods of warmer weather.
7. Required - Irrigation Management Techniques to Reduce Runoff and Pon ding Potential.
A. Making frequent, light irrigation applications, and
B. Not irrigating immediately before predicted rainfall.
8. The owner / manager is required to manage the movement of animals to and from the facility to minimize environmental
impacts, ensure compliance with the facility's permit and amended CAWMP, and avoid discharge to surface waters.
9. Authorization to use the additional practices included in this amendment expires if a facility discharges to surface waters_
Any discharge is a violation and may result in an enforcement action.
10. The owner / operator is required to keep records of all waste applications.
11. This revision must include a map or sketch of new land application areas.
31 - CD2Z
Facility Number-j
Facility Owner/ Manager Name (PRINT)
F,j1i1X Owner / Manager Signature
Date I ' M
-DE)VrEk .3AGi[S0#.I FARM,
Facility Name
Ca_ Gf-errnl CLi1=-roAt
Technical Specialist Name (PRINT)
. Af...-._- CL.0-
Technical Specialist Signature
Date !1 f301 99
This document must be filed at the SWCD office and be attached to the facilities CAWMP
and be available for inspection at the facility.
(*) New temporary sprayfields must meet applicable buffer and setback requirements. Waste must not be applied to wetlands.
1 111111 QOO

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resourc ECFj
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor APR 0 3 1997
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary BY.
A. Preston Howard, Jr., RE.,, Direc o
April 1, 1997
MEMORANDUM
TO: Wilmington Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Sue Homewood
SUBJECT: Notification of Facility Number Change
!09WMA,
Y9�j
�
EHNR
The following changes have been made to the Animal Operations Database. Please make
appropriate changes in your files.
Facility numbers 31-2=2� and 31-115 are
as31-22 and then expanded as separate
been combined under 31-22 and facility
animal operations database.
the same facility, originally registered
farm 31-115. The facility records have
number 31-115 has been deleted from the
If you have any comments or questions please feel free to call me at [phone] ext 502.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Revised AprU 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORYWA DETERMINATION
Facility Number 2_- c22
Farm Name: 5;nv-_ �r•�.,
On -Site Representative: r
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: `
Operation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
Date of site visit: exemption Ef E2 E3 - E4
Date of most recent WUP: (Q t/ Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on P1 P2 P3
Annual farm PAN deficit: pounds
r.
Irrigation Systerri(s).-.circle-#: . hard -hose traveler, ..center -.pivot system; 3. linear. -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanen pipe; . stationary sprinkler system wlporiable pipe;
S. stationary gun system wfpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART L ,!A Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
El Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
.E2 Adequate D, and DJD3' irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 751/16 rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE_7-I5 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that rail the eligibility checklist in Part It. Complete-eligibiRty
checklist, Part 11- F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Par 111).
PART 11.75% Rule -Eligibility -Checklist _and_Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements... WA Determinafion.required because operation failsmne offhe.eligibffity
requirements -listed -ralow:
_ 1="1 Lack:of�c.r--aaeivnicrlT=-suitedannvermppiic-gbonmf-wastevster_-(PAN) on:spr y_
Traid(s):according:io7armtJastiwo:yeasDi inic,�aIIon�ecotds-.
F2 UncisarjIlegibie,, or lack of information/man.- .
_1=3 Obvioussreldlimitations _(numarmuszlitchat;-j iiurzio:deducizegtiired
bufferisetback-mcreage;mr25°o=ofiotal-mcreage-idehNieddri_CAWMPZiribludes= •_=
small;. irreguladyshapediields= trelds_iess�an��cresfor-tra_ veiersmr-4ess�an��=
2 acres7orzationaryzprinklers).-
F4
WA determination required because CAWMP.-crediislfaid(s)'s acreage in -excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in fable in Part Ill.

Rtvised Apn7 20, 1999
Facility Number
Part Ill. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT FIELD TYPE OF TOTAL CAWMP FIELD COMMENTS3
NUMBER NUMBER'-2 [RRIGATION ACRES ACRES
SYSTEM -
FIELD NUMBER - hyarant,-pull, zone; ar..point nu=ers-Tray be used to place -or heia numDe s oepenaing on CAWMP
and type of irritation -system-- !f pulls,-e#c: cross -=re -pan -one field; inspeciorireviewer will have to combine _5 -Ids to
calculate 75% field by -hold determination -for -exemption; -otherwise operation will be subjec to WA deierminauon.
EIELD N UM3_�._ must be r.iearly-d Jineaind nn- Man_
COMMENTS' --back-up fields.witn CAWMP.ac-m-agemxceeding_75% o; its tot.al�cres-and -having Te,,ceivedJess iran 50%
of t'ss -annual.PAN -2s�ocurnented-in -the --;arrn's-previous�wo*years' (1997 & 1998)-of_�rigarionzecords, cannDt-servems-irrigation
sale basis _f Tequiringa WA Determinaiion=13ack�up3ieids-rnust:banoisdin the mol7mentzeafion-nfld-muss-be7accesslbie
by irritation system.
Part IV. Pending WADeterminations ---
t! _P1 Plan Jacks -ollowingznmrmabon:
P2 Plan Tevision-may.satls y75% rule -based .on adeauats-overall .PAN dencitand :by
adiusting-al[iield:acreageiobelow75% use —Tate
P3 Omer (iefin process of installing new irricaiion system):

ft
a
ItECEIVED tEO 2 9 t997
September 27, 1997
Andrew g. Helminger
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845
Subject: RESPONSE TO NOTICE
OF DEFICIENCY
Dexter Jackson Farm
Facility #: 31-22
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Helminger:
I received your Notice of Deficiency concerning the
erosion cuts on the wall of lagoon #2 on September 16, 1997.
I preceded on September 20, 1997 to fill up all the erosion
cuts as well as the top of the lagoon next to the buildings
as we discussed during your inspection of the hog operation.
Since that date I have seeded and mulched the filled area.
I feel comfortable this will work until Spring of 1998,
at which time I will be planting a permanent grass on the
lagoon.
I welcome your visit to the farm at anytime.
Sincerely yours,
AX94-- 104m--
Dexter Jackson

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment RECEIVE
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality JUL 0 2 1998
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor BY:
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 26, 1998
William Dexter Jackson
Dexter Jackson Farm
814 Country Club Rd
Mt. Olive NC 28365
1 FT •
NCDENR
NORTH CARouNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL REsOURCEs
Subject: Reissuance of Certificate of Coverage
No.AWS310022
Dexter Jackson Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and
Application System
Duplin County
Dear William Dexter Jackson:
The Division of Water Quality modified the Swine Waste Operation General Permit originally issued to
this facility on April 30, 1997. In accordance with the issuance of the revised General Permit, we are
forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) to William Dexter Jackson, authorizing the operation of
the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but
not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Dexter Jackson Farm, located in Duplin
County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 14700 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as
specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003, and shall hereby void
COC No AWS310022 dated April 30, 1997. The COC shall hereby incorporate by reference any
specific conditions of the previous COC issued to this facility. The purpose of this COC is to allow
coverage under the revised General Permit. Please review the revised General Permit (enclosed) and pay
particular attention to Condition 1I.10 regarding tree removal from lagoon embankments, Condition III.1
regarding inspection frequency of the waste treatment, storage and collection system and Condition 1I1.6
regarding notification requirements for system failures, spills and emergencies. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
P.O_ Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity -Affirmative Action Employer. 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS310022
Dexter Jackson Farm
Page 2
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sincerely,
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County Health Department
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources r-4
Division of Water Quality A-
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor AdOlkwill1111111110011111111k
E H N F1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 30, 1997 VMAY
Dexter Jackson 1997
Dexter Jackson Farm
814 Country Club Rd
Mt. Olive NC 28365
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310022
Dexter Jackson Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Duplin County
Dear Dexter Jackson:
In accordance with your application received on March 31, 1997, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Farm No. 31-22, authorizing the operation of an animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with the State's General Permit
(attached). This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the
management of animal waste from the Dexter Jackson Farm Farm with an animal capacity of no greater
than 14,700 Feeder to Finish and the application to 336 acres of land. The facility shall be located in
Duplin County with no discharge of wastes to the surface waters.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2001. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP), and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring
data and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production
greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number
authorized by this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed
prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
In accordance with General Statue 143-215.10C, Animal Waste Management Plans shall include
the following components:
- A checklist of odor sources and best management practices to minimize these sources.
- A checklist of insect sources and best management practices to minimize these sources.
- Provisions set forth for acceptable methods of disposing of mortalities.
- Provisions regarding emergency action plans.
Your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must include the above elements. Documentation
of the certification must be available to inspectors onsite.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50°/6 recycled110% post -consumer paper

Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC.
Upon notification by the Division of this. COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Mike Lewandowski at [phone] ext. 362.
Sincerely,
Preston Ho d, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County Health Department
WilmingtanaRegional=4ffice;,Wa= QuaiityzSection
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 17, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
William Dexter Jackson
814 Country Club Rd
Mt. Olive NC 28365
740
4&JF0
EDEHNF-1
Subject: Dexter Jackson Farm
COC No. AWS310022
Duplin County
Dear William Dexter Jackson:
The subject facility was issued a Certificate of Coverage (COC) on 4/30/97 authorizing the
operation of the animal waste collection, treatment, storage, and land application system in accordance
with General Permit No. AWG100000. On Aug. 27, I997 Governor Hunt signed into law the Clean
Water Responsibility Act. The Clean Water Responsibility Act included several changes to the Swine
Farm Siting Act (Siting Act) including the requirement that all set back distances be met for any swine
lagoon or swine house for which construction commences on or after the effective date_of the Clean Water
Responsibility Act (Aug. 27, 1997). Before the Siting Act was amended, it required the set back. distances
be met at the time the swine house or lagoon was sited. The change -in siting- requirements may apply to
your farm since construction may not have commenced by the effective date of the Clean Water
Responsibility Act.
Your farm was permitted prior to the effective date of the Clean Water Responsibility Act;
therefore, you meet one of the exceptions to the moratorium. However, the farm must be re-evaluated
and, if necessary, re -designed to meet the new requirements of the Siting Act to remain covered under the
General Permit. Within 15 days of the date of this letter, you are requested to submit, notification to the
Division of Water Quality whether the farm was under construction on or before Aug. 27, 1997.
If the farm was not under construction on or before Aug. 27, 1997, then a revised Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan must be submitted to reflect the new siting requirements. Construction not in
compliance with the Siting Act is a violation of State Statutes and the General Permit.
If you have any questions or comments concerning this matter, please contact me at .(919) 733-
5083 extension 540.
Sincerely,
14f
i G
Kim�t"'Cson, u rvisor
Non -discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr. Division of Water Quality Wayne McDevitt
Governor Secretary
September 15, 1997
U T. 0- a a s
William Dexter Jackson
Dexter Jackson Farm
814 Country Club Road
Mt. Olive, North Carolina 28365
Dear Mr. Jackson:
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Dexter Jackson Farm
Facility Number: 31-22
Duplin County
On September 12, 1997, staff from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
inspected your animal operation and the lagoons serving this operation. It was observed that erosion cuts
on the wall of lagoon #2 could eventually threaten the integrity of the structure. As we discussed during the
inspection, all erosion cuts should be filled and revegetated. We suggest that you contact your service
company, local NRCS office, or Soil and Water District office for any assistance they may be able to
provide to correct this situation.
To remain a deemed permitted facility, you must notify this office in writing within fourteen (14) days
of the receipt of this notice, what actions will be taken to comply with your waste management plan. Failure
to "do so may result in the facility losing its deemed permitted status and being required to obtain an
individual non discharge permit.
Please be aware it is a violation of North Carolina General Statutes to discharge wastewater to the
surface waters of the State without a permit. The Division of Water Quality has the authority to levy a civil
penalty of not more than $10,000 per day per violation.
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, wilmiagton, N.G. 28405-3945 0 Telephone [phone] a Fax 91D-350-2OD4
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

William Dexter Jackson
September 15, 1997,
Page 2
Gf you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Andy Helminger, David Holsinger, or
Brian Wrenn at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
Andrew G. Helminger
Environmental Specialist
cc: Harold Jones, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation
Sandra Weitzel, NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Glenn Clifton, Prestage Farms, Inc.
Operations Branch
Wilmington Files
S:1 WQ,S 1 A 71ID YA V 3I -22. DEF

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
.tames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
William Dexter Jackson
Dexter Jackson Farm
814 Country Club Rd
Mt. Olive NC 28365
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Dexter Jackson Farm
Facility ID#: 31-22
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Jackson:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form -must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 91gn33-0026.
Sincerel ,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, W 4 FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Nimf An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 - 500% recycled/ 10°k post -consumer paper

Operator: William Jackson##2
County:__ _________ _________ _________ ________>
Date:____
Duplin
########
! ?
Fa
1 a;'�i�.z.`
Dist.to nearest residence (other than owner):
ft.
sows (farrow to finish):___
sows (farrow to feeeder)
head (finishing only):===__ _________________>
3600
sows (farrow to wean):===-- ---------===-====>
head (wean to feeder):===__
0
Ave. Live Weight for other operations(lbs.)=>
Storage volume for sludge accum. (cu. ft.):=>
Treatment Volume (min. 1 cu. ft./lb.)===__;'>
1.0
25 Year - 24 Hour Rainfall (in.)===_____=___>
7.5
Rainfall in excess of evaporation (in.) ---->
7.0
Drainage area of buildings & lots (sq. ft.).>
Volume of wash water (gallons/day)====______>
Temporary storage period (days)_____________>
ISO
Freeboard(ft.):---_-_---_-_________________>
1.0
Side slopes (inside lagoon):________________>
2.5
1
Inside top length (ft.):=___________________>
400.0
Inside top width (ft.):_____________________>
220.0
Top of dike elevation (ft . } :________________>
54.5
Bottom of lagoon elevation
42.5
Seasonal high water table(SHWT) elev.(ft.);=>
Total required volume:====_ ________> 711018
cu. ft.
Actual design volume:______ ________> 760742
cu. ft.
Stop pumping el.(> or = to 0.0 ft.SHWT)>
50.1
ft.
(> or = to 48.5 ft.Min.)
Required minimum treatment volume: 486000
cu. €t.
Volume at stop pumping elevation: 486307
cu. ft.
Start pumping elev.:=_______________________>
52.8
ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation: 705726
cu. €t.
Actual volume less 25yr-24hr rain: 705742
cu. ft.
NOTE: Verify that temp. storage is adequate:
Req. volume to be pumped:====> 170018
cu. ft.
Actual volume to be pumped:==> 219420
cu. ft.
l4d6vittl' 1'eviJa
Sa"(ie ICJ 11G� Ar bf9GoAriivoTr-ot A0
f !q q�
13 -ew

v iEGISTR.kTwON FORM cOR ASIM L FEEDLOT
Department of Environment, Health and Natural `Resquz�F`s, -,
Division of Environmental Management",`
Water Quality Section
If'the animal waste management system for your feedlot operation is
designed to serve more than or equal to 100 head of cattle, 75
horses, 250 swine, 1,000 sheep, or 30,000 birds that are served by
a liquid waste system, then this form must be filled out and mailed
by December 31, 1993 pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 (c) in order to be
deemed permitted by OEM. Please print clearly.
':'arm Name:
Mailing Ad
C
Owner (s) Name: W A V i r4 r»1 I)CJtC-q Ar�3
Manager(s) Name:
Lessee Name:
Farm Location (Be as specific as possible: road names, direction,
milepost, etc.) }
r
!nn.,i
Latitude/Longitude if known:_ /S`1a31 -6W-19
Desicn capacity of animal waste management stem (Number �ynd type
of confined animal (s)) : '%a35�3 :t' ErIF► 1!'� TQ - �.,.:�f.
Average animal population. on the farm (Number and type of animals)
raised) AS
Year Production Began: �l ASCS Tract No.: 4 71�
Type of Waste Management System Used: !) ]4�,I]em "a , QA)
Acres Available for Land Application of Waste
Owner (s) Signature (s) : DATE: —/ -
3I-aa

State of North Carolina �1�PL��✓_.
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 •
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes,,Secretary
® Cc
.
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director.
April 9, 1993
William D. Jackson
814 Country Club Road
Mt. Olive NC 28365
Dear Mr. Jackson,
This is to inform you that your completed registration form required by the recently
modified nondischarge rule has been received by the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM), .
On December 10, 1992 the Environmental Management Commission adopted a water
quality rule which governs animal waste management systems. The goal of the rule is for animal
operations to be managed such that animal waste is not discharged to surface waters of the state.
The rule allows animal waste systems to be "deemed permitted" if certain minimum criteria are
met (15A NCAC 2H .0217). By submitting this registration you have met one of the criteria for
being deemed permitted.
We would like to remind you that existing feedlots which meet the size thresholds listed
in the rule, and any new or expanded feedlots constructed between February 1, 1993 and
December 31, 1993 must submit a signed certification form to DEM by December 31, 1997.
New or expanded feedlots constructed after December 31, 1993 must obtain signed certification
before animals are stocked on the- farm. Certification of an approved- animal waste
management plan can be obtained after the Soil and Water Conservation Commission adopts
rules later this year.
We appreciate you providing us with this information. If you have any question about.
the new nondischarge rule, please contact David Harding at [phone].
Sincerely,
-001V
1144- Steve Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
P.O. Box 29535, Rdeigh, North CaroUna 27b2b-06.35 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Aftumative Acfion Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper