The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About240094_INSPECTIONS_20171231❑ DSWC Anilmal Feedlot Operatioa Review DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site inspection 10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other Facility Number Date of Inspection 5-12AN71 Time of Inspection = 8p 24 hr. (hh:mm) Total Time (in fraction of hours Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review 5 Certified ❑ Permitted I or Ins ection includes travel andprocessing) ❑ Not Operational y _Date Last Operated: ......_..... .,_.»........................................................_.{.................._......._........................_............. Farm Name: .........1XGtSLp.� ..�. Q?]yC—.._ .... r.,..� _...._._.... ..». �...... County: `l�.S ......,_.....,_ _..... _..._ ...... Land Owner Name:.... ?YiYat�,.....r:Ors. G 4kct.... ......... .......... ........ _........ .......... Phone No: _-(�.L0.1. .4T.=.. 117.......... ................ ..... _.. Facility Conctact:...A1 fi.. ®, ... �,. Title: .._... .._...... ... _ ... i® Phone No: ..» ...... . ,,. __...,. r ............... Mailing Address: ....... -T �� .... � ...._ . _ ...... �........... .... _......_............. ��L.+ ! .." � .tt..��......... _ ....._......_ _ .. 4(AL � ._....... OnsiteRepresentative:.....�1_��. .......�.. ... Integrator: Certified Operator: ..� .�lCia15 _ .... ..»» »......» » ,..».» ... » ... Operator Certification Number: Location of Farm: r.r _..._�FID . ....... . .. . . . ........ . ..... - Latitude `C IZ< Longitude ' ®4 lta 44 General 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ONO 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 19 No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes D9 No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) [] Yes E� No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? N9 6 d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 5Z No 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 1 No 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? D Yes OfNo 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require C4 Yes ❑ No 4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? Continued on back Facility Number:.. ?�-- . ...... 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No Structures (Lagoons and/or HoldingFondsl 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Stricture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 .,..... az......... ... ......................... ....... ._..... ....... — ............................ 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ....... ._..... ❑ Yes o...... ® No 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes 64No Waste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes PNo (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQI) 15. Crop type .......... _..... ..... .......�Y1lt< n..... ...... ......... . ............. 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes §a No 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 55 No 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? Yes ❑ No 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes CgNo 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes KNo 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes [ No For Certified Facilities Onty 22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes No 23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes (ji No 24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes [9 No Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: S_ cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97