100036_INSPECTIONS_20171231

U Division of Water Resources /'
rFae ity Number `� 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation L-
p Other Agency
Type of Visit: Urompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review p Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral Q Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: O3 Departure Time: 1090 County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
(V-4' V C %ram r A
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
Ilets
Pou lts
Design Current
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes C] No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
0 Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Ins ection:
x
YAste Collection & Treatment �
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Z i ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in). -
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
jNNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
'[�
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
EJ'NNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA El NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ FAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs_ ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ElICJ No
❑ NA
1i
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
© NA
�-NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ No
Q NA
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
the appropriate box.
❑WUP []Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements []Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ffNE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Condnued

Ifacitity Number: - Date of Inspection: /
i
24 Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permi ? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA/NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA//Tn`NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA O�E
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No Z6 NA ❑ ONE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ;2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ONO
0 NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes zEj No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA'a�
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES` answers and/or any additional ree©mmendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
_ / j n �y ,{� 1 � j� �(
��►�ti ����4LC/ G� �Q �-� L [ �� 1Jf�' � IJ 'ff� /�✓ /'1�� r� Sic
t
�'rlL ^--
Reviewer/Inspector Name.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Cj t,.,x rj 5 -- q I P 7 70 zr &,:K
-4�t"e((
Phone: f o 71 � 7,34 y
Date: r l �A
21412015

Division of Water Quality
OI)�visio i of S6tl and'Vat
C nserva ton �E
O Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation. Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 10 g6 Date ofvisit: 11120l2Q4i Time: 8:t5
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted 0 Certified [] Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold_ _ __ __ __ __ __ _.
County: )xu[IFY]ek--•--•--....--•--•-
Farm Name: �?unAQJn.F:arms-.Qld.&.NV.W............................•.................•. ..__.._.__. ?4'313 -------
Owner Name: l'ilkur--------------._ F.afR------------------------------ Phone No: 4X-Q53_ft43._.-------------------------..
Mailing Address: .7.4Q6.f"A 5jQKl.RQ,all.......... .................................................. ................ ?4fLllAl8h4J? ,iY..........................,....................,.. ,. 28.479 .,............
FacilityContact: ........................................................... Title: ............................................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: milt7A<C. .............................. Earp................. ............... ............ ....... Operator Certification Number: Iiz7.QQ..........................
...
Location of Farm:
)n the left of SR 1518 approximately one mile past SR 1521. +
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Curr
Swine C*anaetty Pannh
Latitude 34 • 06 4 30 Longitude 78 • 02 6 2S u
❑ Wean to Feeder
N Feeder to Finish
1710
® Farrow to Wean
2900
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharses & Stream Impacts
Des
Itry Gaul
Design Current
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes Z No
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 23 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 10 No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:--•--•--.--?1d........... .......... New .,__.__.----------------------
Freeboard (inches): 45 33

l VJVU3/UL
Facility Number: Iti-36
Date of Inspection 11/20/200I
aunrtnueu
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pending ® PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
Yes
[]No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
®No
® Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type Bermuda hay and graze Small Grain Overseed Fescue (Graze) Com, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ W", checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. FaiI to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Yes ® No
® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Gam,ments:(refer tv; uestion Ex lain an .'Y18ns�vers"andtor an recommendatioins or a�n other "comments:
q )� p.. Y y" Y " -
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. "(use additional pages as necessary); El Field Copy El Final Notes
19. Need to be sure to use a waste analysis dated within 60 days of application events on IRR-2's to calculate nutrients applied. I
recommend to take waste samples every 60 days.
Note: There is a discrepancy in the acreage shown in the tables and on the map of the irrigation design. The correct acreage needs to be
determined and the waste plan and records written based on correct acreage.
31. Some feed has been placed on lagoon wall. Feed needs to be disposed of elsewhere, recommend taking to landfill or could spread on
ow crop field.
7. A repair needs to be made on the new lagoon dike wall where a pipe was recently clogged and digging occurred to remove clog. Mr.
jEarp is waiting for lagoon level to be lowered to repair.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Stone>dall llriathisva
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /2, LlO e)

` , . !
'05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 10--36 Date of Inspection 11/20/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 0 No
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes X No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes H No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additions -°. omments and/or Drawings: -..-
Overall, the facility and sprayfields are neatly kept.
11. It appears that the 2001 corn crop was overapplied to on Field 96 by 5.72 lbs Plant Available Nitrogen/acre. This appears to be
due in part to the discrepancies in acreages shown on maps and tables for the farm. The Soil and Water District and Regional Office
have worked with Mr. Earp to show the correct acreage for the fields as of 12/10/01.

0biviision. of water Quality 41
Q Division of Sod and Water Conservation
a Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection © Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
IReason for Visit © Routine © Complaint © Follow up O Emergency NotifrcationJD'Other ❑ Denied Access I
Facility Number 1 bate of Visit: i% Time:
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
13 Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ............. t �!! n:de l.'..?.......�..;'..VV-k..j..................................................... County:..... ` °�Sl . ,�� ................
OwnerName: ..... N.......... ..! ............ �f....................................................... Prone No:.................................................................... .........�
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
MailingAddress:................................ii..................................................... ........... .................... ...... �p r
Onsite Representative: ......... f.'�1 i l tr ti^ - f .... a"�r....................... Integrator:....i.
Certified Operator: ........................... ... . .................. .................. . ......................................... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 ` 64 Longitude 0 A K
Design Current
Swine CREMA y Panulatien
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity population Cattle capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Tugs 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Im acks
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes f�No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes /Q No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? ;'7 rC;
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ZNo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 'PrNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes jf�'No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? [] Spillway ❑ Yes Z'No
Structure 1 SArg4ture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
�'f..K�..'........... /Ucl,!
Freeboard (inches): Fj 33
5100 Continued on back

FacilitYWamber: I Date of Inspection ZIP
5- Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 'gNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes P"No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? FKes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ,EfNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ONO
Waste Anolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 1!(No
11. Is there evidence of over application? [IExcessive Ponding�PAN [ISr Hydraulic Overload Y5es o
12. Crop type jecr-ntme, 1450-f ,�6irt ze, t C,,.-RIn ► r zee C glaze. form .rjke4) t-av'S
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes '0140
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ErNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23- Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
P.
viola#iQos'ar- 001:4e�ci were hgtt�1- 0466g tbis. :vWK; . Yo r'will-teegiye i�[1 u>! t gr . . .
correspondence. abatiti this :visit. ' • - - - •
❑ Yes 'Lallo
❑ Yes )ZrNo
❑ Yes,, No
❑ Yes 'Jo"No
❑ Yes dNo
0 Yes )EfNo
Yes No
❑ YesJ No
Yes ONo
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes"EYNo
❑ Yes 2rNo
❑ Yes j2'No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.:
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Ajeee(4,-,> 6e svfe -re Ltse ei 1,.ej54e a��l.r,'s - Cad � ,.-� ta4 Aqy1
eWafp1Mo4'et, evgds-on 71CP9- qef 4 cqrc.t.,,144q Pv4,e�ey1fr Affhed_
-17 y-e.Cp^JrV�41 40 �y +.✓ems -fie .s'�,�Ies eves �� ��
X.Jr c ' -Tt7eee !J ejd �'sGre ?►'tr a n 4t-ie �q e-ree a i-, 1 i -k 6le 5 a"
dj'L " W Rr O-1^ --i' to et ales ► 61 _ Lte Graf re r_4 9z1wtc
r�ec"45 jz5 1"� AC4e'—A 1;.je'4 Qv1 DA �1P1 /ec vo-A-f —
Reviewer/Inspector Name 0 '-s"
e.
f,�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: � ✓�' Date:lyzol41 5/f111

Fac' Number. ,I — f Date of Inspection ]l C!
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes PIN
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes/40
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes/,dNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
IU,,4e ecan4, n ucA) Lijr f=�ee� hose. eX-7 C- t 4 4tc"e6!90.
1, SO "Ie- -Feed s �ce?7 19log c CO( a-1 I aD'nok-• 1'� 11. eed Ced S
4v bk d ► s p ose /� � or f 5c-t,)h',rrC f Ar,.c m,,1,011 al 4,q k-;n9 � lct,-it,- I
C d o 1 d .S�r ,reed o n { ,r'�►t.0 c.o�P - ',`e I d
7, 4 r'er.0 �/' e7eed's -�� �c rVtade eln - k,, qew 4e l a9 aoan Ake
t'Alt j t-VtiC),e n if wets reoe44ty 6 OJ'Jed al'P►d d{����
40c6orred 40
i eve f 4o
OVCVgl l f - 41e - ac,'1�= ,� �Yta{ sf '0- I'e1�1 s a�P ne-? `1� kC�.
App-r--fS 40 - e,e 200 1 ca,ril r e w f vve�al°1°f �'Ec{ lo 11-1
5.72- 16 pia ' ble ,rU4.,,d kilo,
nt PeL;rs 4a 6e Aue rr? rf 4o 4l,e d./SC-repa&1NUie C m acle ex
5ttowln os, vy-.i75 An4 la b1Q1 ¢ro l -� k-en. S
7 e sel ' w� e� dtrS f; -V and 40 UV h�✓� fiu�r ev�
r� JL' no r, �,,, �a S5-A,L,i -the co��ec� �l G✓ea�e rsa.� 4Lzc
off, f z/f clnl .
J
5100

r] Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
13 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
13 Division `of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
_ .
13 Other"Agency -Operation Review
0 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review AD Other
Facility Number 1 ) Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection] C 1 24 hr. (hh:nun}
Permitted [3 Certified © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered [3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ... n S4,, v} Fe, +`�S — a 1 C r rC Coun r V ✓)? 5 W, G k _---..............
.................................................... 7_!_V..................................... tJ = �.................... .., _....................,. .
Owner Name: .. '- E`' r
. ..�......U..........................P............................................................... Phone No:........................................................... ..........,..............
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:...................................... Phone No:
..........................
MailingAddress: ................................. ..... ......................................... ........ ........................... ......... ........-........
Onsite Representative: v�^or r ..... Integrator: f°w'� S a�D ! iY1 q
Certified Operator:,...,... .................................. ....... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
1. ................................... ..... .............-..................--------...........................---... ..l T
Latitude • 6 t. Longitude • & 64
Design Current Design Current Design Current
$wine Capacity, Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer I ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish JE1 Non -Layer I I Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity;
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area.
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps `: ❑ No Liquid 'Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[] Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ElLagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (II' yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ............
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on buck

jFacilifV Number: j 0 , 31, I
Date of .Inspection
Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
El Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11 Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
IT. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19_ Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20_ Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0: yieiaf oils:oi, def cienc�ie�s *&L% hated- #ruing this:visit • Y:ou wflj-teeeiye iio fui-th ... _
corris' &rideitce ahauti this visit :.::.::.:::: :.::.:.:::::::::: :
Comments (refer to question ##). Explain any YES answers and/or ariy recommendations orany other cocmen-
Usse drawings of €acihtyjo, bet ter *xplain situations. (use,additional pages as`necessary):
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
'Tpy571p4e CA i p vx c Otn4 u G0 ►r16 V 'a e`J �' � C� Y►! 'I 4 f f l c+� ► ✓lDt e'` S W� It
AL
c.��� w'i7c�e un 1':_ 440 be P0111,'i -%o. I s. �fr' has ;ns4M)ie4 Vngr-ter(_
G✓M � c � �¢m 1- 2 IVror;de �► °od 6f),.A(
Iq,-• CAep cn►, ola(j u- -;�- �n,-Ae" -�e re�.6k 1rne,re A. ' ��r -I; ?o[ <a 10*1 j
,,,SSY� i o"a �4 t v_ge,, is s-4; // py-a v, i'ded� Adv;:,re-A M.^,rrtr`,'' 4a J
r=�! 77vvt
,4,� eve -4f o -ko( P r e j ff R / G1 �^ 7e, era 5 v" n 6 r V n 1W
IReviewer/Inspector Name x x I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:: Date: 0�

e
p Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review.;
p bivision of Soil and Water Conservation Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
p Other. Agency - Operation Review
10 xouvne p I-omptaint p rouow-up of Lwy inspection p rouow-up of U3wL, review 0 vtner
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ®24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted ■ Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered 113 Not Operattona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ................................................................. County: Brunswick WIRO
OwnerName:Wilhw.E.............................. Earp......................... .................................... Phone No: 9.1.0725.3-:564a ..........................................................
Facility Contact: ............................. •.................... ................Title: . Phone No:
Mailing Address: U.M.E..unston.Road............................................................................!kV.itwa,lww.NC........... .............................. ............ 28.479 ..............
Onsite Representative: V!'.i har,Earp............. s....................... ............................. .......... Integrator: Rrowz!.s,af.Caxotiza,.Iac.................. ........ ......
Certified Operator: W. jIbur.E.............................. Earp ................................................... Operator Certification Number: 16700,............ .......... ......
Location of Farm:
Latitude . ®° ®K Longitude . ®6 Q�
-Swine Capacity 'Population
❑ can to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
N Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to ee er
❑ Farrow to Fm15
❑ Gilts
p Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer 1 1[3 Dairy
p Non -Layer I I❑ on- airy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 4,610
Total SSLW 1,486,554
Number of Lagoons 2 ❑ u surface Drains Present I [ agoon Area p Spray �e rea
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE3 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? O Yes p No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) d Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, not' DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? N Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .............. Qlji........................... New .............
Freeboard(inches): ...............2.1............................... 3Ii............... ................................... ,,.............I........„................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes rl No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: 10-36 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
p Yes
p No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
13 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
p No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
p Yes
p No
Waste Application
I0. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
p No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN
p Yes
la No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
p Yes
p No
14. a) Does the facility Iack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
p No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
p No
Reauired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
p Yes
p No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
p No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes
p No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
p No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
p No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
® Yes
d No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
p No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
p No
IMN ':viotatio�ns-or. deficiencies -were -noted fduring.14is -visit, - :S owwiil-receive n4 further - -
...e6&6s * idepce: abbitt this:visit:-::................................. .
Comments (refer to question#): Explain any -YES answers and/or any,recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawiogs of fseil�t�;to better explarrsituations (use addfanal pages as riecessair
y)� -
Inspection conducted after flyover of the farm. ,i
2. Waste had discharged from sprayfield "Field 6" into a wetland/stream system. Discharge appears to have occurred from two
seperate application areas, one discharge into the wetland and another into the stream that said wetland drains into but further
downstream. Instructed Mr. Earp to block the ditch draining the wetland area to prevent further drainage of waste from wetland to
stream. Further instructed Mr. Earp to pump the waste from the wetland onto his sprayfield. Mr. Earp blocked the ditch and began
pumping prior to my leaving the site. Water Quality samples and pictures were taken,
10. Tracks from travelling gun reveal that gun may have been pulled to close to wetland. Sufficient buffers should be maintained
to prevent waste from leaving the sprayfield,
ReviewerlIns ector Name -
P Stonewall Mathis
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 7 Z e 049

Frinted on 31111201U0
Facility Number: 10_36 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 13 Yes 13 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes 13 No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes (3 No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 13 Yes 13 No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, mussing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes p No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes p No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes p No
n� y 1 ,
w _
2. Mr. harp stated that he was aware of the discharge prior to today's inspection. No attempt was made to contact DWQ.
_
r
T, `;
' f
f
1�
b
a
r, [7... •�,T -h,',T•-+.a-. .a. ....,, r t.r'- zr, -J.a� -. .., ._
.tea.-,ia� t1a �7.��q �t
- c
- `
�ti4 -
rta -�- Yr� 4�1a �_, -- �ge�•°�rx�,.L�{! - Z�' .r ,L_il
a�
c, -
•.tea""
.:- ..... ....«:. . .. ,._
'. .... -• ..-. .::..-•.-,.'. si.-. ,..-. ..r• .. .•-rr.�:: .,_ �:1+.we._r�7.. ssd S�ir,«..ci'�lw a. a.r Aim,. - .�..un _,

Facility Number lfl 36 Date of Inspection 3-8-z0i30
Time of Inspection 14.00 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted H Certified E3 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered 10 Not O erational Date bast Operated:
Farm Name: Fu-nsxQA.FArnas.-.Al, A.Ncm.................. .-................ --..... ........................ CountE:Brunswick ......... VE'- o.........
Owner Name: Vk'.i bur.&.......................... EArp ... ......... -............... ............................... Phone No: 9.10=253-5543.....•...............................
FacilityContact: ................................. ........ r.................................... Titie:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: . ................................. . .iuMUh0.1,.NC.._.....................................----........ Z84.79 .............
Onsite Representative: ................ _ Integrator: Brown'
. ,..................................
Certified Operator• . - .Jilbut:.E..........E ..... Operator Certification Number:.16700.......... ..................
Location of Farm:
........................ ........................ -.................... ............. .................... .......... ........ _. ........-.........r ..._................. ......... ...... ............. .......... I ....................... ...d ....
�a floc.lc#.��1�.�......,alrpxa aicl3:.nns.mils.pas1.S�C,..iS.�L................ _.... �......,,............,.............,...........---•----.......................
........------•......................................................- •--- ............. ... ........ .......---------•-••• =-- ...................... ............__-_.-. �
Latitude 34 OF 06 ; 30 Longitude 78 " 02 25 u
Discbarges & Stream Impacts.
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Yes
10 No
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon Q Spray Field C] Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
Yes
© No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
El Yes
0 No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notiA, DWQ)
E] Yes
© No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
M Yes
No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
191 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
El Yes
O No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: ..............ult1...... itcA.......,............................................................................. ....... .......,,....,,......................................-......
Freeboard (inches): ................. ............. a... 3 ................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
F7 Yes
F&. No
seepage, etc-)
3/23/99
Continued on back -

FF;itilit 'Plumber— 10-36 Date of Inspection
3-8-200D
6, Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancefimprovement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
IL . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
I4. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
0 Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Reuuired Records & Documents
17_ Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
I & Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil, sample reports)
❑ Yes
No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
-
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
IR No
23. Did Reviewer./Inspector fail to discuss reviewfmspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
St -No-irioCatinrns ar:d;efrciencies ivere:riote:d: raring its visit:: eau �v��:receivir nQ Nrliier: _ _"
".'rlirrteririoi�nrioia%3Fvi;it t1iiciri'.O.A. .
03-08-00, at approx. 13:10 hr. Mr Wilbur Earp called in a problem with a stopped up flush line on his sow farm (new). When I
lege) arrived, there was a backhoe, mud pump and a suction truck on site. No waste was present other than in the hole where the
►nowt was. The waste was being pumped back into the lagoon,
.A
Reviewer/Inspector Name tixoge..
......,-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: i Dater /'Q -

T
: [3 Division of Soil and, Water Conservation -Operation Review'
Q Division of Soil and;V4'ater Conservation - Com Dance Inspection; .
Division of Water Quality -. Cor'pliance Inspection
El Other,A envy -'Operation Review
10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other _
Facility Number f C9 .3'(0
Date of Inspection 3 I y O4
Time of Inspection a 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Q Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered [3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: F-u n 5. en 6, ✓- M S — County:._ / tJ nS t.Sif .i,G. fL.....................................
ff.....''....................................................... �� . �1d...!............._.
Owner Name W - I & .v e- CAS Phone No
................................................................................................................ •......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ................
Title:
Phone No:
MailingAddress:.................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................
Onsite Representative: �' v E r ]Integrator: 1�.^o t��lf `j...°.:F....C., -,:.I ; yl
....................................................... .....
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................ ................................ Operator Certification Number: ...... ....................................
Location of Farm:
.............................. ........_...............................
Latitude ' 4 44 Longitude • 4 44
Design Current
Swine canacity Pnnninflan
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I JCI Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present jp Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharaes & Stream Innpac_ts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes ❑ Na
Discharge originated at: ElLagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ElYes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3_ Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Freeboard (inches):
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3123/99
Yes ❑ No
Continued on back

Facility *tuber: 10 - (, Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum Iiquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
13_ Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage &. General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0: Rio yiolaii�ris'oF de icit?r�ctes were pgtea il>jrrtn9 :hits'vAli Yoi� �l >reegiye Ito ai<th r
. corresVondence: bwt thiis visit:.... ............ " ................. .
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #) Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments:
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary);
�+nsrocG �vr-� Gonc vc_4ed cis a C,,jjo of a�
t '`.1 Z- / - 1 � �t @ �r I ft D + ►'1 SdpeC4To A.
rt .
'D Sw G JTA• W me w �ti fir oL,,,e,- 4o reV; v W 'a✓'�°\ S i G'
Gynp� p1,.fGv.s5 41.xe �G�q^O�t pI;JGove✓'EA o,,-, Z/7/00,
\J
Reviewer/InspectorName
Reviewer/Inspector Signature ,, Date: / "ao
3/23/99

p Division of Soil and WaterConserrvation -.Operation ReJew
' Q Division of Soil and Water.Cotoservation Comiineeettiox
om lecctti�
Division of Water�!all Can- p.
[3 Other Agency - Operation 'Review.
lQ Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review A Other j
Facility Number ! Q Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted © Certified 13 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
P ..........................
s wcounty:r v n w
Farm Name: T. ' ...._._.. °�.... `1......ii�........ .........................................! ....................................... ---...................
Owner Name: t.G �rPhone No:
.........................
.............................................................._...
Facility Contact: ...................
Title: __
Phone No:
Mailing Address: ..................... ..............................
Onsite Representative: li''�,I.x.. t:C 0 r E01f integrator ` """ I �� !.l l.�-
Certified Operator: ................................................ .
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:........
r..........................................,......,....._.._._......... ............ .,............
, .
Latitude ° Longitude
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Fie
Number of Lagoons ❑ld Area
Holding'Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a_ If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of (fie State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min"
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: f
Freeboard (inches):.........L-_i................. ............ ..............I........... ........
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Oe/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes [_-]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
❑ Yes ❑ No
Continued on back
3/23/99

Facility N,mber: le — ,�� Dale of Inspection
6. Are t*re structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
y
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15- Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste. Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0: Nd-yiWhtigirws,oir deficie d'es' •*e're bted. ding #his:visiL - Vott WHI •receive f further • : ;
corres oriden[ce. about. this visit.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
f j' tl e c, j it e � � a d Y1 :77m 41 o ,t � h.�y� Q C r� 1 a it , � �
W'�ve 40'o3i hA✓✓✓S e-r-tided �►�n�r IAJJaoh w�l�. O eSHa h►5
rGC., ��wd 2S-�'L[�j��-��` r�JtSS [,ti1%C✓ ��it? , + c�r?bl S f vGf�l1 � % A'-i
;S Oroof
1 +� U
�U4epf mlreA where u I-514e I-JAS s ft^A�ed rr1 waf)ds, Purr--
S.aid -> LL)OO jS ro/' Ab0n tt a 61n ejnd i GlgI-F,
CV',4CV1Cr4,Jr% (�/C�—i ►' ��ttY �G{�C, It9 —iD �`��S IJ�+OC�t�q.� t,
ra►. r.an � � :
Reviewer/Inspector Name ...:.
p ,r) eW - � .. _ f S
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: bd/� t, ,,Q f q kN,,F-- Date:
3/23/99

Division of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DW ins cation O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
�'� Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection ! 60 124 hr. (hh:mm)
[3 Registered er ified © Applied for Permit Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: - .. AR �-------- County:...... :...�s.S �rR-..........................................
i _'r.............•.......................... (�
Owner Name: ......... W4...1 ..�.�.'j?........... ..... ..�A- r--...,.................................... Phone No: �-� ... ....5, ...[-� ...........-..........1
Facility Contact:.....W...!.,�......!..f�.!!?...... Title:...�C".�..k�`........................ Phone No:...................,...............................
Mailing Address. ...74..._ .0...... r tf ✓i �j_ f C�lU?....m,P..d .................. .......*1424.1.A-6.44 ..... 1at24.1.A-6.(1 �'�!'r . ...��,. ...�°�.�..�.........�
r
Onsite Representative:.... � /!..1.6..��. . ........ ... Integrator:...... '�r �.. E. Yvt'-
Certified Operator:.—`v..`---� �"2-... _....... ....... A....,.........o............... Operator Certification Number;. (L�
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude �• �' �"
Poulfry �:
t.
311 Cattle
� lumlierofLagoons l Holding Pon& ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
No Liouid Waste
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
10 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
RNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon 0 Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
0 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
El No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
cl. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
UNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
R No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
IgNo.
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
0 Yes
MNo
maintenancelimprovement?
b. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
EYNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
14 No
7/25/97
Continued on 6ack._==

Facility Number: / — 3 & 1-f (�--
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,lfolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I
Identifier: .,, {���..............
Structure) Structure 3
....Z�
Freeboard (ft): ........... .......
............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes 10 No
J&Wes ❑ No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
........................................................................
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
12, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? EYes ❑ No
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes 19 No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes P No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type L .C....':!: ................ �,.�........................,. Sr...k.,.,.......... ................ _. .__..
................14.,...I........................,
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes R No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 1( No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes (XNo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes W No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 0 No
21, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes Od No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes 91 No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes LQ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes Ej No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ONo
0 No violations or deficiencies. were noted during this. visit.- You. win receive no further
correspondence about this. visit:- .
Comments (refer to question #) : ;explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any: other.. comments
Use drawings of facility to betterexplain situations. (use, additional pages as necessary):
4, ,tfff 7 : - 4A, M A ac>s] Jov +� L11,1 . �V� 411 "l c+c�c� � s
6
T
A bo , �r ' t. rWL c i r
SAG , �% tl r �p - r
7125197
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Date: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� / j