20190405 Ver 1_401 Application_20190401

-0- WithersRavenel
.. Our People. Your Success,
March 27, 2019
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Mr. Ross Sullivan
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
NC -Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Ms. Karen Higgins
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Re: City of Raleigh - Shelley Lake Pedestrian Bridge No. 19 Replacement - NWP 14 PCN
Raleigh, Wake County
WR Project #02160300.00
Dear Mr. Sullivan and Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of the City of Raleigh, we are requesting authorization from the USACE to use NWP 14
for 0.07 acres of temporary wetland impacts, associated with the construction of the relocation
and construction of a new Bridge #19 for the greenway trail on the east side of Shelley Lake, and
removal of the existing greenway bridge. We are also requesting a 401 WQC from NCDWR for
the above referenced impacts, as well as a Buffer Authorization for 6,138 sf of impacts to Neuse
River Riparian Buffers.
The project area is ±1.22 acres in size and is located on the east side of Shelley Lake, north of
Shelly Lake Park on W. Millbrook Road in Raleigh, Wake County (Latitude: 35.860574°N;
Longitude: -78.659053°W). The project is located in the Neuse River basin and onsite waters
drain to Shelley Lake/Mine Creek. The Water Quality Classification for Min Creek is C; NSW and
the Stream Index Number is: 27-33-14. The cataloging unit for the site is 03020201.
Proposed Project
The purpose of the proposed project is to realign the existing greenway trail crossing to relocate
the greenway and pedestrian bridge outside of the existing sewer easement. Bridge #19 is being
relocated because the existing bridge is only -3 If from top of a City of Raleigh sewer line, which
will be replaced in the near future. Therefore, the City of Raleigh is relocating a the portion of the
greenway trail and Bridge #19 in advance of the sewer replacement in order to prevent the
greenway trail from being closed during sewer replacement, as well as eliminate sewer
maintenance disturbing the greenway in the future.
The proposed project consists of the construction of a new 12 -ft wide x 85 -ft long pedestrian
bridge to cross the existing stream and wetland. Additionally, new sections of 10 -ft asphalt
greenway trail will be constructed on both sides of the new bridge in order to realign the greenway
trail to tie the existing trail to the new bridge location. The new asphalt greenway trail sections
will be constructed entirely in uplands.
219 Station Road, Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28405
t: 910.256.9277 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

City of Raleigh - Shelley Lake Pedestrian Bridge No. 19
Replacement- NWP 14 r0 WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
In order to prevent the disruption of greenway traffic during construction, the existing bridge will
be left in place. Once construction of the realigned greenway and new bridge, the existing trail
and bridge will be demolished and removed, and the disturbed area restored to natural grade and
seeded for stabilization. The wetlands will be seeded with a wetland seed mix.
During construction, access for equipment and materials from W. Millbrook Road to the project
area will utilize the existing culverted greenway crossing of the stream south of the project area in
order to stream impacts for a temporary construction crossing (see Bridge 19 Access Exhibit in the
Impact Maps).
Proiect History
Onsite wetlands were delineated by WithersRavenel in May 2017. A Preliminary JD Request
packet has been provided as an Appendix in support of the delineation. WR is not requesting
issuance of a JD for the proposed project.
The stream within the project area is depicted on the Wake Co. Soil Survey and was determined
to be intermittent in the field. Therefore, subjectivity to Neuse River Riparian Buffers was
conceded, and a formal buffer determination from NCDWR was not requested.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of 0.07 acres of temporary wetland impacts and 6,138 sf of impacts
to Neuse River Riparian Buffers.
The demolition and removal of the existing pedestrian bridge will result in 0.04 acres of temporary
wetland impacts (Impact 1), 2,335 sf of temporary Zone 1 impacts and 1,548 sf of temporary Zone
2 impacts (Impact 3).
The construction of the new pedestrian bridge will result in 0.03 acres of temporary wetland
impacts (Impact 2) during construction of the pedestrian bridge. Construction of the greenway
trail and pedestrian bridge will result in 1,358 sf of permanent Zone 1 buffer impacts and 897 sf
of permanent Zone 2 impacts (Impact 4).
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be minimized.
Wetland impacts have been minimized to only temporary impacts necessary for construction of
the new pedestrian bridge and demolition/removal of the existing pedestrian bridge. Stream
impacts have been avoided through the use of the pedestrian bridge to cross the stream, as well
as utilizing an existing culverted greenway crossing for construction access over the stream to the
south of the project area.
Page 2 of 3

City of Raleigh - Shelley Lake Pedestrian Bridge No. 19
Replacement- NWP 14 r0 WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Upon completion of construction and demolition activities, temporary wetland impact areas will
be restored to natural grade and seeded with a wetland seed mix. Temporary buffer impact areas
will be restored to natural grade and seeded with a riparian seed mix.
Permanent riparian buffer impacts have been minimized by crossing the stream at a perpendicular
angle.
Mitigation
The proposed wetland impacts will be temporary, and therefore wetland mitigation is not
proposed.
The removal of the existing greenway trail and pedestrian bridge (Impacts 1 & 3) are classified as
an "Exempt" activity in the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules and therefore, mitigation is not
required.
The construction of the new greenway trail and pedestrian bridge (Impacts 2 & 4) is classified as
an "Allowable" activity in the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules and therefore, mitigation is not
required.
The current request is for 0.07 acres of temporary wetland impacts and 6,138 sf of impacts to
Neuse River Riparian Buffers. (see attached maps and PCN for details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely
WithersRavenel
Troy Beasley
Senior Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• Parcel Information
• Delineation Exhibit
• USGS Quad
• Wake County Soil Survey
• Preliminary JD Request
• Impact Exhibits
Page 3 of 3

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
COR - Shelley Lake Pedestrian Bridge No. 19 Replacement
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Wake County
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Book: 2394; Page: 664
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Rick Stogner— Facilities & Field Director
3d.
Street address:
PO Box 550
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27602
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-870-4025
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: City of Raleigh
4b.
Name:
Dianne Sauer
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
City of Raleigh Parks, Recreation & Cultural Resources Director
4d. Street address:
222 W. Hargett Street
4e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27601
4f.
Telephone no.:
919-996-4815
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
Diane. B.Sauer(a�raleighnc.gov
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Troy Beasley
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
WithersRavenel
5c.
Street address:
219 Station Road, Suite 101
5d.
City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28405
5e.
Telephone no.:
910-256-9277
5f.
Fax no.:
910-256-2584
5g.
Email address:
tbeasley(a)withersravenel.com
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
PIN: 1706087302
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.860574°N Longitude: - 78.659053°W
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
±1.22 acres within project area
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Shelley Lake/Mine Creek (Stream Index: 27-33-14)
proposed project:
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C;NSW
2c.
River basin:
Neuse River Basin (HUC: 03020201)
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project is located within an existing, cleared sewer easement through a wooded portion of the land surrounding
Shelley Lake. The general land use in the vicinity of the project consists primarily of residential development.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
±0.12 acres within the project area.
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
±130 If within the project area.
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to realign the existing greenway trail crossing to relocate the greenway and
pedestrian bridge outside of the existing sewer easement. Bridge #19 is being relocated because the existing bridge is
only —3 If from top of a City of Raleigh sewer line, which will be replaced in the near future. Therefore, the City of Raleigh
is relocating a the portion of the greenway trail and Bridge #19 in advance of the sewer replacement in order to prevent
the greenway trail from being closed during sewer replacement, as well as eliminate sewer maintenance disturbing the
greenway in the future.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project consists of the construction of a new 12-ft wide x 85-ft long pedestrian bridge to cross the existing
stream and wetland. Additionally, new sections of 10-ft asphalt greenway trail will be constructed on both sides of the
new bridge in order to realign the greenway trail to tie the existing trail to the new bridge location. The new asphalt
greenway trail sections will be constructed entirely in uplands.
In order to prevent the disruption of greenway traffic during construction, the existing bridge will be left in place. Once
construction of the realigned greenway and new bridge, the existing trail and bridge will be demolished and removed, and
the disturbed area restored to natural grade and seeded for stabilization. The wetlands will be seeded with a wetland
seed mix.
During construction, access for equipment and materials from W. Millbrook Road to the project area will utilize the existing
culverted greenway crossing of the stream south of the project area in order to stream impacts for a temporary
construction crossing (see Bridge 19 Access Exhibit in the Impact Maps).
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
El Yes ®No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: WithersRavenel
Name (if known): Lyle Phillips
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Onsite wetlands were delineated by WithersRavenel in May 2017. A Preliminary JD Request packet has been provided
as an Appendix in support of the delineation. WR is not requesting issuance of a JD for the proposed project.
The stream within the project area is depicted on the Wake Co. Soil Survey and was determined to be intermittent in the
field. Therefore, subjectivity to Neuse River Riparian Buffers was conceded, and a formal buffer determination from
NCDWR was not requested.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
Impact 1
Removal of Existing
Herbaceous
(within sewer
❑Yes
®Corps
0.04
❑ P ® T
Bridge
easement)
® No
® DWQ
Impact 2
Construction of
Headwater Forest
® Yes
® Corps
0.03
LlP ® T
Pedestrian Bridge
El No
® DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.07
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
— Permanent (P)
or Temporary
T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑ PEI T
04 ❑ PEI T
4L Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose of
pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5L Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
Impact 3
Removal of
Existing
UT to Shelley Lake/Mine
❑ Yes
2,335
1,548
❑ P ® T
Bridge
Creek
® No
Impact 4
Greenway
UT to Shelley Lake/Mine
❑ Yes
1,358
897
®P ❑ T
Trail/Bridge
Creek
® No
6h. Total buffer impacts
3,693
2,445
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts to wetlands
and "waters" could be minimized.
Wetland impacts have been minimized to only temporary impacts necessary for construction of the new pedestrian bridge and
demolition/removal of the existing pedestrian bridge. Stream impacts have been avoided through the use of the pedestrian
bridge to cross the stream, as well as utilizing an existing culverted greenway crossing for construction access over the stream
to the south of the project area.
Upon completion of construction and demolition activities, temporary wetland impact areas will be restored to natural grade
and seeded with a wetland seed mix. Temporary buffer impact areas will be restored to natural grade and seeded with a
riparian seed mix.
Permanent riparian buffer impacts have been minimized by crossing the stream at a perpendicular angle.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Access during construction will be through uplands. Silt fencing will be installed around all disturbed areas. Pedestrian bridge
is being used to cross wetlands and streams to avoid permanent impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h.
Comments:
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The proposed project consists of relocation of an existing greenway trail
❑ Yes ® No
which will not result in a net increase of impervious area and therefore does not
require stormwater management or diffuse flow.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
N/A %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The project consists of realignment of an
existing greenway trail and bridge, which does not require stormwater management.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Raleigh
® Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments: The impacts from the proposed project are below thresholds
requiring NEPA/SEPA approval. However, full NEPA documentation has been
completed in the event that Federal Funding is applied for.
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project consists of the realignment of an existing greenway trail, which will not be a catalyst
for future
development that could impact nearby downstream water quality.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
WR reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at http://www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/home, as well as
NCNHP GIS data to identify if there were any known occurrences of endangered species on or near the proposed project.
The review of the NHP data did not identify any recent occurrences of federally listed threatened or endangered species
or critical habitat on the subject property or within 1.0 miles of the project, see attached NCNHP project review letter.
Furthermore, site reviews did not identify any potential habitat for any federally protected species known to occur in Wake
County. Specifically, project area is not located within the known range of the Yellow Lance or Tar River Spinymussel.
Additionally, the intermittent stream within the project area was not considered potential habitat for the Cape Fear Shiner
or Dwarf Wedgemussel, and the stream will not be disturbed during construction. Therefore, the proposed project will
have No Effect on federally protected species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no waters classified as EFH in Wake County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
WR reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: http:Hgis.ncdcr.gov/hi3oweb/, to
determine if there were any known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The
database review did not identify any known resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The proposed project consists of the relocation of the existing
greenway trail and pedestrian bridge, and the proposed activities will not result in a net increase of fill within the floodplain
and therefore is determined to be a No Rise.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfloodmaps.com
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Troy Beasley — WithersRavenel
Authorized Agent
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
03/27/19
Date
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

■■ WithersRavenel
.. Our People. Your Success.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION &
ACCESS AUTHORIZATION FORMS

1%WithersRavenet
Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Client, Citvof Raleieh (Client) does hereby appoint WithersRavenel. Inc. as
his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate local, state and federal
environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Water
Quality, local municipalities, etc.) for: a) review and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries
of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands, streams, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation
and submittal of appropriate environmental permit applications/requests for the City a
Raleigh Greenway Repair Project. Structures 17 & 19 at Shelley Lake and Structure 37 on
Crabtree Creek in Raleigh, Wake County,
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
(See attached Right of Entry for City of Raleigh for Wake County (Land
Owner) for structures 17 & 19 at Shelley Lake)
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Date: DCCCVVJ�r
Agent's Name, Address&Telephone: Signature of Client:
WithersRavenel. Inc. �Y7� 7Gf�e l !/t✓�
(Name - Print) (Title)
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511 (Signature)
Tel. [phone] zzZ, W • l-k�rwe i�
Mai ling Address
'(Na\MeLN f4 C- aI(aoI
City QQTate Zip
Phone:
Email: �tu'h�• $' •mac@ �0•It1a1C1r1G•�O�/
115 MacKenan Drive � Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 � f: 919.467.6008 � www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Car7 Greensboro I Pittsboro Raleigh Wilmington

REAL ESTATE ID # 0095533
RIGHT OF ENTRY PERMIT
THIS AGREEMENT made this the T� day of December 2017, by and
between Wake County, a body politic and corporate of the State of North Carolina
(hereinafter called Landowner) and The City of Raleigh, (hereinafter called Permit
Holder).
The parties hereto agree as follows:
The Landowner hereby grants unto the Permit Holder, its employees, agents,
consultants and cooperating parties, the right and privilege to enter at any reasonable time
for purposes of access to investigate, to obtain state and/or federal approvals and permits,
and to repair the two bridges used currently existing on the property of Landowner
described as:
Being all of that ±118.72 acre property located at 1140 W.
Millbrook Road, Raleigh, NC commonly known as Shelley
Lake and as further described at Book 2394, Page 664,
Wake County Registry.
This privilege to enter is subject to the following provisions and conditions:
1. The teen of this permit shall run from execution of both parties until dusk
of January 31, 2020. If necessary said term may be extended subject to
mutual agreement on behalf of all parties.
2. The Permit Holder agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the
Landowner from any and all loss, liability, claims or expense (including
reasonable attorney's fees) arising from bodily injury, including death or
property damage, to any person or persons caused in whole or in part by
the negligence or misconduct of the Permit Holder resulting from
activities conducted on said property by the Permit Holder, its contractors,
agents or employees, except to the extent same are caused by the
negligence or willful misconduct of the Landowner. It is the intent of this
section to require Permit Holder to indemnify Landowner to the extent
permitted under North Carolina law.
3. In conducting the above activities, the Permit Holder, its contractors,
agents or employees agree to exercise reasonable care in order to
minimize physical damage to Landowner's property and agree to return
the property to its original condition.
4. The specific purpose of this Right of Entry is to grant Permit Holder
access over Landowner's property with all necessary equipment to

complete the City of Raleigh's project to repair the wooden boardwalk
around the lake.
5. Permit Holder agrees to coordinate said access with Wake County General
Service's Field Services staff and that all activities will occur under
supervision of City of Raleigh staff.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of the
above stated date.
LANDOWNER
Wake County
Q96160c�- -;
By: Mark Forestieri
Director, Wake County
Facilities, Design and Construction
PERMIT HOLDER
City of Raleigh
By: Diane B. Sauer
Parks, Recreation & CuItural Resources
Director, City of Raleigh
LANDOWNER'S CONTACT INFORMATION:
Rick Stogner
Facility & Field Services Director
General Services Administration
Office: 919-870-4025
Email: [e-mail]
PERMIT HOLDER'S CONTACT INFORMATION:
Diane B. Sauer
City of Raleigh Parks, Recreation & CulturaI Resources Director
Office: 919-996-4815
Email: [e-mail]

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
PARCEL INFORMATION

PIN: 1706087302
Total Value: $3,858,400
PIN Ext: 000
Biling Class: Exempt
Real Estate ID: 0095533
Description: SHELLY LAKE PROJECT
Map Name: 1706 05
Heated Area:
Owner: WAKE COUNTY OF
Site Address: 1140 W MILLBROOK RD
Mail Address 1: WAKE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S
Street Name: W MILLBROOK RD
OFFICE
City: RALEIGH
Mail Address 2: PO BOX 550
Planning Jursidiction: RA
Mail Address 3: RALEIGH NC 27602-0550
Township: House Creek
Deed Book: 002394
Year Built:
Deed Page: 00664
Sale Price: $0
Deed Acres: 118.72
Sale Date:
Deed Date: 4/20/1976
Use Type:
Building Value: $0
Design Style:
Land Value: $3,858,400
Land Class: EXEMPT
N
0 425 850
1 i i 1
1 inch = 800 feet
1,700 ft
Disclaimer
Maps makes every effort to produce and publish
the most current and accurate information possible.
However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied,
are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
DELINEATION EXHIBIT

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 50 100
1 inch = 100 ft.
m
l\
- J
E /
NOTES:
" 1) WETLAND DELINEATION PERFORMED BY WR ON 05/04/2017.
_ 2) WETLAND/STREAM/LAKE/BUFFER LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE, BASED ON
7. GPS LOCATION, WAKE CO. GIS DATA AND TOPOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION.
' 3) BUFFER SUBJECTIVITY BASED ON APPLICATION OF NEUSE BUFFER RULES.
4) WETLAND DELINEATION AND JURISDICTION NEEDS TO BE VERIFIED BY CORPS
3 OF ENGINEERS.
RALEIGH GREENWAY REPAIR PROJECT 1/
BRIDGE #19 - SHELLEY LAKE WETLAND/BUFFER DELINEATION EXHIBIT 1� WithersRavenel
Engineers Planners Surveyors
RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USGS QUAD

a:ll a -J.^
�Debhm P
e
C
X44 t
1e1111aVpn o
p �
f o
A Farksl1.
y� a t Branderrnill PROJE
' p � . I 1 ! 5y. Y1h-:', � �� r f :� :t.. rr :.c.t•s.s--rz:
I'
i R
E Qi x
Bus g 7
70 Ci
WYN
RALEIGH GREENWAY REPAIR PROJECT
BRIDGE #19 - SHELLEY LAKE
iH WAKE COUNTY NORTH CARC
shcfley,
1,oke
1'00dbu-'i]lae os
-.4 spa ri
USGS QUAD (2013) - RALEIGH WEST
■_ rHaV@II -v .-
�
w
P � - - re.�� f �`•. - mac ; ."M1
_ Q F
f`•
o -Fairfa €
e4 - -)-+ �; Hills •.
Scarsdale z
- e+x�smFw R ' �uctea
'.ishley= ,
Park� T r--
N GLEN .Qa _
-. N orrthglen� xHEERofT I �% i
Fl
-� o. N01� '
•. �H'ES'11P�OGE•DR
_ r HIckory Hills_
Farrior
110 WithersRavenel
I/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
K
GRAPHIC SCALE
i
0 1000 2000
a
3
1 inch = 2000 ft.
• Pines o€
{ r _
+ Brookha%-en
W
c I
��
a:ll a -J.^
�Debhm P
e
C
X44 t
1e1111aVpn o
p �
f o
A Farksl1.
y� a t Branderrnill PROJE
' p � . I 1 ! 5y. Y1h-:', � �� r f :� :t.. rr :.c.t•s.s--rz:
I'
i R
E Qi x
Bus g 7
70 Ci
WYN
RALEIGH GREENWAY REPAIR PROJECT
BRIDGE #19 - SHELLEY LAKE
iH WAKE COUNTY NORTH CARC
shcfley,
1,oke
1'00dbu-'i]lae os
-.4 spa ri
USGS QUAD (2013) - RALEIGH WEST
■_ rHaV@II -v .-
�
w
P � - - re.�� f �`•. - mac ; ."M1
_ Q F
f`•
o -Fairfa €
e4 - -)-+ �; Hills •.
Scarsdale z
- e+x�smFw R ' �uctea
'.ishley= ,
Park� T r--
N GLEN .Qa _
-. N orrthglen� xHEERofT I �% i
Fl
-� o. N01� '
•. �H'ES'11P�OGE•DR
_ r HIckory Hills_
Farrior
110 WithersRavenel
I/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 150 300
1 inch = 300 ft.
Shelley
Lake
RALEIGH GREENWAY REPAIR PROJECT
BRIDGE #19 - SHELLEY LAKE
�4
PROJECT AREA,
USGS QUAD (2013) - RALEIGH WEST
1! WithersRavenet
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY

GRAPHIC SCALE ' n
0 150 300
"i—m�A4rk%.
% • l
. A
1 inch = 300 ft. • n
CgC2r' � Cn��
f CeF
CgC2.pop
-
C4
Cg c'?
•
GIM...... .........
CeF
C183 ID
r �C
Cm AM
., m
CIE3 tko
2 - dp^ Q
4
RALEIGH GREENWAY REPAIR PROJECT WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY (1970) -SHEET 38 10 WithersRavenel
BRIDGE #19 - SHELLEY LAKE Engineers l Planners I Surveyors
RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
PRELI M I NARY J D REQU EST

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 1140 W Millbrook Road
City, State:
Raleigh, NC
County: Wake County
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 1706087302
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: We Phillips - WithersRavenel
Mailing Address: 115 MacKenan Drive
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
Z
Cary, NC 27511
919.535.5165
[e-mail]
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: Wake County
Mailing Address: PO BOX 550
Telephone Number:
Raleigh, NC 27602
919-870-4025
Electronic Mail Address: Rick-Stogner@wakegov-com
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
z Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
See attached Authorization Form
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑ Authorized Agent'
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOVUSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarX JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area ± 1.22 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
35.860396°N
-78.659244°W
F7A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
ul Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug lato!3 -Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
zCompleted appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs. please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
✓0 USGS Topographic Map
❑✓ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑ Landscape Photos (if taken)
❑ NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ug latorL/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_ App _ A_ Prelim_ JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.g.M.mil/Missions/Re ug latoiy-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Lyle Phillips — WithersRavenel; 115 MacKenan Drive,
Cary, NC 27511
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 1140 W Millbrook Road, Raleigh, NC 27612
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake County City: City of Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.860396°N Long.: -78.659244W
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Mine Creek; Index: 27-33-14
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
Latitude (decimal
Longitude
Estimated amount of
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority to
Number
degrees)
(decimal degrees)
aquatic resources in
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic resource
review area (acreage
wetland vs. non-
"may be" subject (i.e.,
and linear feet, if
wetland waters)
Section 404 or Section
a licable
10/404
Wetland A
35.860564°N
-78.659191 °W
f 0.12 Acres
Wetland
Section 404
Stream 1
35.860510°N
-78.658930°W
128 Linear Feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Lake
N/A
(Shelley
35.860540°N
-78.659441°W
(Outside the Review
Non -wetland
Section 404
Lake)
Area)

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD fords that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor: Lyle
Phillips - WithersRavenel
Map:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Raleigh West Quad (2013) — 1:24K
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake County Soil Survey (1970) — Sheet 38
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): Aerial 2013 — nconemap.com
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations. 02/07/2019
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
WithersRavenel — Authorized ALrent
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

■■ WithersRavenel
,. Our People. Your Success.
Raleigh Greenway Repair Project
Bridge #19 - Shelley Lake
WR Project No. 02160300.00
Jurisdictional Determination Request Information
Applicant - City of Raleigh
Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Department
PO Box 590
Raleigh, NC 24602
Property Owner - Wake County
PO Box 550
Raleigh, NC 27602
Physical Address - 1140W Millbrook Road
Raleigh, NC 27612
Written Authorization: See attached Agent Authorization form
Nearest Municipality- City of Raleigh
County - Wake County
PIN - Wake Co P I N # - 1706087302
Drainage Basin - Neuse River Basin
HUC Code: 03020201
Receiving Waters - Mine Creek
Stream Index: 27-33-14
Classification: Class C; NSW
Decidegrees - 35.860396°N; -78.659244°W
USGS Quad Map - Raleigh West Quadrangle
Soils Map - Wake County Soil Survey - Sheet 38
Total Area - Review Area - ±1.22 acres
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Cary I Greensboro Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

1%WithersRavenet
Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Client, Citvof Raleieh (Client) does hereby appoint WithersRavenel. Inc. as
his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate local, state and federal
environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Water
Quality, local municipalities, etc.) for: a) review and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries
of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands, streams, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation
and submittal of appropriate environmental permit applications/requests for the City a
Raleigh Greenway Repair Project. Structures 17 & 19 at Shelley Lake and Structure 37 on
Crabtree Creek in Raleigh, Wake County,
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
(See attached Right of Entry for City of Raleigh for Wake County (Land
Owner) for structures 17 & 19 at Shelley Lake)
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Date: DCCCVVJ�r
Agent's Name, Address&Telephone: Signature of Client:
WithersRavenel. Inc. �Y7� 7Gf�e l !/t✓�
(Name - Print) (Title)
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511 (Signature)
Tel. [phone] zzZ, W • l-k�rwe i�
Mai ling Address
'(Na\MeLN f4 C- aI(aoI
City QQTate Zip
Phone:
Email: �tu'h�• $' •mac@ �0•It1a1C1r1G•�O�/
115 MacKenan Drive � Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 � f: 919.467.6008 � www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Car7 Greensboro I Pittsboro Raleigh Wilmington

REAL ESTATE ID # 0095533
RIGHT OF ENTRY PERMIT
THIS AGREEMENT made this the T� day of December 2017, by and
between Wake County, a body politic and corporate of the State of North Carolina
(hereinafter called Landowner) and The City of Raleigh, (hereinafter called Permit
Holder).
The parties hereto agree as follows:
The Landowner hereby grants unto the Permit Holder, its employees, agents,
consultants and cooperating parties, the right and privilege to enter at any reasonable time
for purposes of access to investigate, to obtain state and/or federal approvals and permits,
and to repair the two bridges used currently existing on the property of Landowner
described as:
Being all of that ±118.72 acre property located at 1140 W.
Millbrook Road, Raleigh, NC commonly known as Shelley
Lake and as further described at Book 2394, Page 664,
Wake County Registry.
This privilege to enter is subject to the following provisions and conditions:
1. The teen of this permit shall run from execution of both parties until dusk
of January 31, 2020. If necessary said term may be extended subject to
mutual agreement on behalf of all parties.
2. The Permit Holder agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the
Landowner from any and all loss, liability, claims or expense (including
reasonable attorney's fees) arising from bodily injury, including death or
property damage, to any person or persons caused in whole or in part by
the negligence or misconduct of the Permit Holder resulting from
activities conducted on said property by the Permit Holder, its contractors,
agents or employees, except to the extent same are caused by the
negligence or willful misconduct of the Landowner. It is the intent of this
section to require Permit Holder to indemnify Landowner to the extent
permitted under North Carolina law.
3. In conducting the above activities, the Permit Holder, its contractors,
agents or employees agree to exercise reasonable care in order to
minimize physical damage to Landowner's property and agree to return
the property to its original condition.
4. The specific purpose of this Right of Entry is to grant Permit Holder
access over Landowner's property with all necessary equipment to

complete the City of Raleigh's project to repair the wooden boardwalk
around the lake.
5. Permit Holder agrees to coordinate said access with Wake County General
Service's Field Services staff and that all activities will occur under
supervision of City of Raleigh staff.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of the
above stated date.
LANDOWNER
Wake County
Q96160c�- -;
By: Mark Forestieri
Director, Wake County
Facilities, Design and Construction
PERMIT HOLDER
City of Raleigh
By: Diane B. Sauer
Parks, Recreation & CuItural Resources
Director, City of Raleigh
LANDOWNER'S CONTACT INFORMATION:
Rick Stogner
Facility & Field Services Director
General Services Administration
Office: 919-870-4025
Email: [e-mail]
PERMIT HOLDER'S CONTACT INFORMATION:
Diane B. Sauer
City of Raleigh Parks, Recreation & CulturaI Resources Director
Office: 919-996-4815
Email: [e-mail]

PIN: 1706087302
PIN Ext: 000
Real Estate ID: 0095533
Map Name: 1706 05
Owner: WAKE COUNTY OF
Mail Address 1: WAKE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S
OFFICE
Mail Address 2: PO BOX 550
Mail Address 3: RALEIGH NC 27602-0550
Deed Book: 002394
Deed Page: 00664
Deed Date: 04/20/1976
Deed Acres: 118.72
Building Value: $0
Land Value: $3,858,400
Total Value: $3,858,400
Billing Class: Exempt
Description: SHELLY LAKE PROJECT
Heat Area: 0
Site Address: 1140 W MILLBROOK RD
City: RALEIGH
Township: House Creek
Year Built: 0
Sale Price: $0
Sale Date:
Use Type:
Design Style:
Land Class: EXEMPT
Old Parcel Number: 379-00000-0474
750 1,500
1 inch = 1,433 feet
3,000 ft
Disclaimer
tMaps makes every effort to produce and publish
the most current and accurate information possible.
However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied,
are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

f0
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 50 100 ° o n
D C/
1 inch = 100 ft. O O
Q
O D O I
� 0
E Q 0
o
3 O
3
O � a
1 1 t
a
RALEIGHGREENWAY REPAIR PROJECT 1/
BRIDGE #19 - SHELLEY LAKE AERIAL - 2013 1/ WithersRavenet
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 50 100
1 inch = 100 ft.
fO
a
Z�]
0
RALEIGH GREENWAY REPAIR PROJECT
BRIDGE #19 - SHELLEY LAKE
O
o
yi-,&
' NOTES:
1) WETLAND DELINEATION PERFORMED BY WR ON 05/04/2017.
1 2) WETLAND/STREAM/LAKE LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE, BASED ON GPS
LOCATION, WAKE CO. GIS DATA AND TOPOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION.
WETLAND DELINEATION EXHIBIT
40 WithersRavenet
1 / Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

z VAL�Y IAKED/i \ 0 2 X07 I., RUN DRYS pR
k'fDGEL`AND �
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 1000 2000
3 5p RANGECREST RD �� �t 3� W0008END.pR VAN 7HOMA pR
300
1 inch = 2000 ft.
J� creN�ao� z350 on the Green s�o I or• �t \�
I Z
'moo Pines of %►�►TON3r ) n ���� o ' J ' � r � t' z `�T� ��'y`o `c
Brookhaven
ppenhaven
Chi
J 'TSS 'l
i . Broo
F19 ( Square ]� a=z c
SIY.�
\� s
_ �'I o ',f ", o �. a •� � _ r ForLS
a7 3 PASTILLE �" o Brandermill REVIEW AREA
r -BASIL DR-
�
Shelley
Lake
gidgeIoc
A
Deb] n Park
1` PNOEL_DR p ��
Scarsdale F -
¢DR_ CR-SMEW I ' �MILLBRCOX RD
'Yorkshire ., r - �zkff.RD t
lr �1JG DR Do��ns? _ �� J ;� (% QPgN 00i-
Park
� �--AshleY �� OR
` Park
PURDUE ST;
FtiA GLEN D. -o
UG -,- PIN\ I r / \z `GUN11pSONPL _ nOrthglen y o
W z z ;- /// _ fad 1 l x PIN:CRCF70 p; r
GZr STAMiARD l7cr \v �i l ) \' o VORTHF�IELD DR R a T
I VD v } ;f r f� ,Tit �WM,
� �E.DR Lakemont o
Z i •� J l ar ���, Hickory Bills
aaooK-de� -ST } `\ o
a n Woodbury Villa e-
/, ✓� I p a g. EROWANSr )�8rrior
grsi ✓ H;LLOCKDR \1 Lrd His
3
RALEIGH GREENWAY REPAIR PROJECT USGS QUAD (2013) - RALEIGH WEST ;! WithersRavenet
BRIDGE #19 - SHELLEY LAKE Engineers lPlanners lSurveyors
RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 150 300 n
1 inch = 300 ft.ho . Im ...M. e
{
Shelley
Lake
RALEIGH GREENWAY REPAIR PROJECT
BRIDGE #19 - SHELLEY LAKE
I .
4
�J
REVIEW AREA'— 1
USGS QUAD (2013) - RALEIGH WEST
WithersRavenet
1 / Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

--
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 150 300 /� — �"
1 inch = 300 ft. �� � •� •
Cm ,
CgC2 Cge
-. 000
CeF -
C g 2
9C2
,-OWe�
s '
�! GIC3
Ce F
,CIB3 U
C ts AfA
E CIE to
� l I
'
of ;p, �a
1-1 7
3 �
RALEIGHGREENWAY REPAIR PROJECT
�� WithersRavenel
BRIDGE #19 - SHELLEY LAKE WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY (1970) - SHEET 38 1/
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

Print Form
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Raleigh GWRP - Bridge #19 - Shelley Lake City/County: Raleigh/Wake Sampling Date: 05.04.2017
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Dept. State: NC Sampling Point: DP -1
Investigator(s): M. Richmond & L. Phillips - WR Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): <1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.860756174°N Long: -78.659198904°W Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Cm - Chewacla soils NWl classification: Headwater Forest
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x❑ No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ❑x No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No 0
❑ Is the Sampled Area
0
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes ❑x No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks:
This sampling point is located within Wetland A near Flag A-10, at the Lat/Long specified above.
Sampling point is located T from Shelley Lake edge of water.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Q Surface Water (Al)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2)
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
El Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
BWater
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
J❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
l Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
El Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
0 FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes No __0 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes No Depth (inches): at 3"
Saturation Present?
Yes No__0 Depth (inches): at 3"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No n
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland Hydrology was present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP -1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Betula nigra
Absolute
% Cover
10%
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
x❑ FACW
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
5%
x❑ FAC
3
4.
❑
❑
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
6.
❑
❑
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
7.
❑
Prevalence Index worksheet:
15%
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
1 Betula nigra
5%
x❑ FACW
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
2. ❑
3.
❑
FACU species x 4 =
4.
❑
UPL species x 5 =
5.
❑
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
❑
7
❑
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
5% = Total Cover
Shrub StratumPlot size: 15' Radius
( )
1 None ❑
2
3
4.
❑
❑
El
— 3 - Prevalence Index is <_$.0
— 4 - Morphological Adapations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
6
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
�
Oo/
❑
= Total Cover
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1 Saururus cernuus
20%x❑
OBL
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
2 Peltandra virginica
5%x❑
OBL
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
3
4
5.
6
7.
8
9.
10.
❑
©
❑
❑
❑
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
11.
12.
❑
❑
Woody vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
25%
= Total Cover
1•Toxicodendron radicans
20%
x❑ FAC
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
5•
20%
❑
❑
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes x❑ No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
The vegetation at this sampling point was hydrophytic.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP -1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks
0" -14" 10YR 2/2 95%
7.5YR 4/6 5% C M Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Q Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2)
0 Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) -[-] 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) fl Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) Q Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Q Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_� Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Matrix S6)
Stripped (
Dark Surface x (S (LRR P, S, T, U)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
__0[�
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x❑ No ❑
Remarks:
The soils at this sampling point were hydric.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

Print Form
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Raleigh GW RP -Bridge #19 -Shelley Lake city/county: Raleigh/Wake Sampling Date: 05.04.2017
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Dept. State: NC Sampling Point: DP -2
Investigator(s): M. Richmond & L. Phillips - WR Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): <1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLR,. LRR P Lat: 35.860756174°N Long: -78.659198904°W Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: CeF - Cecil sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x❑ No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ❑x No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑x No ❑
❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present. Yes 1:1No ❑
� ❑x No ❑ Within a Wetland? Yes x
Wetland Hydrology Present.' Yes
Remarks
This sampling point is located within uplands adjacent to Wetland A near Flag A-10, at the Lat/Long specified above.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
[l Surface Water (Al)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
a High Water Table (A2)
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
BWater
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
E] Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
l Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
El Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes No __0 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes No Depth (inches): >16"
Saturation Present?
Yes No __Z Depth (inches): >16"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No nx
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology was present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Quercus nigra
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
1 None
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
1 None
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1.Smilax rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: DP -2
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
0
5 /o
x FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
5%
x❑ FAC
❑
Total Number of Dominant
4
Species Across All Strata: (B)
❑
Percent of Dominant Species
100%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
❑
Prevalence Index worksheet:
10%
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
0
5 /o
x FAC
FACW species x 2 =
❑
FAC species 35 x 3 = 105
❑
FACU species x 4 =
❑
UPL species x 5 =
❑
Column Totals: 35 (A) 105 (B)
❑
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3
5%
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_$.0
❑
- 4 - Morphological Adapations' (Provide supporting
❑
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
0°/
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
o
= Total Cover
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
❑
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
❑
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
❑
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
©
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
❑
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
❑
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
❑
3 ft (1 m) in height.
ri
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
0% = Total Cover
20% x❑ FAC
❑ Hydrophytic
❑ Vegetation
20% = Total Cover Present? Yes x❑ No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
The vegetation at this sampling point was hydrophytic; however, all species at this sampling point were FAC.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP -2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0" - 16" 7.5YR 5/6 100%
Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Q Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2)
0 Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) -[-] 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) fl Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) Q Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Q Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_� Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Matrix S6)
Stripped (
Dark Surface x (S (LRR P, S, T, U)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
__0[�
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No x❑
Remarks:
The soils at this sampling point were not hydric.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
I M PACT EXHIBITS

F', ki2=_-w1Pvk �� r
xeM«x NYr. a„�
Wrldam a Umstead $
RaleigkDUlham Stale Park-Gtenwaoel A
PROJECT LOCATION
,el^
L� oaw
® Neuy
F4ileaiJte
3tube F
x
® O
NorN Carolina 1p m
r° Museum a(Art ¢'a
W>4ArTnro iJ
North ® V
Ca NCSIete FairO Carolina State
rreCG ema ry W UNWenaly {V IMIpM.asae
MN. Pa,k RALEIGH
PUFenPan
im..xa •w,� seta . � y �.+ F' �.+rc,� a ; � � � �—,�an
a
ED
Dal
CIE
r '�7wSUK
/ '4]
rehwwllk � . E Lute J i ,/ 0 1 i'
VICINITY MAP
G
LOCATION MAP
0 1000 2000 3000
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1” = 1000'
en el
l7
�yC
0='
®O
Arpory
Airport
al
o
'
'c
W
N
J>S-
O d
F`hwYN
._B
$
Mellxoo4
' O
j'
Crabtree Valley Mail
F4ileaiJte
3tube F
x
® O
NorN Carolina 1p m
r° Museum a(Art ¢'a
W>4ArTnro iJ
North ® V
Ca NCSIete FairO Carolina State
rreCG ema ry W UNWenaly {V IMIpM.asae
MN. Pa,k RALEIGH
PUFenPan
im..xa •w,� seta . � y �.+ F' �.+rc,� a ; � � � �—,�an
a
ED
Dal
CIE
r '�7wSUK
/ '4]
rehwwllk � . E Lute J i ,/ 0 1 i'
VICINITY MAP
G
LOCATION MAP
0 1000 2000 3000
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1” = 1000'
Y Z Z
0�
N Z1.11.1 Ld
U
W W 0 a.
Fv)
U
m
O
a`
�.s
�yC
0='
al
z_
W
N
J>S-
Y Z Z
0�
N Z1.11.1 Ld
U
W W 0 a.
Fv)
U
m
O
a`
roject No.:
2017.008
REVIEW
F� ,a0� Issued Date:
�F7 � �J�_ 08 18 2017
p� rawn By. JDG
Checked By TGZ
Hm
CL
a
al
z_
W
N
roject No.:
2017.008
REVIEW
F� ,a0� Issued Date:
�F7 � �J�_ 08 18 2017
p� rawn By. JDG
Checked By TGZ
Hm

0
N
a
m
m
0
N
r—
CD
N
N
00\
V
U
V
Q
E
F --
LU
EXISTING BOARDWALK
TO BE REMOVED
EDGE OF WATER —\
N
\Alignment=Bridge 19 Trail — (1) \ �m
Station=10+55.24 \ \
Offset=0.000 -�
Northing=768156.7847 _
Easting=2100926.5043
`031(
SS �
\ >>X O \ _SSS tom\
0 1
N
IMPACT 1
SHELLY LAKE WETLAND — TEMP
BRIDGE REMOVALO
0.04 ACRES
2020 SIF
/< e ry
N
r / m
mk
\ WETLANDS
SS
PROPOSED 456LF
GREENWAY TRAIL \ \ \
Alignment=Bridge 19 Trail — (1) —
Station=11 +85.60
Offset=0.000 I
TOP OF DECK EL.=257.50 I
Northing=768254.4049 I I
Easting=2101010.1076 I
IMPACT 2
LLJ
1 11� o l l l
\� 11 III III I
►ISI III I
� � I� I, IIII I•
WETLAND —TEMP PROPOSED 12'CLEAR /
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION BY 85 FT BRIDGE)
0.03 ACRES
1,212 sF PLAN
i
/ Alignment=Bridge 19 Trail — (1)
Station=12+70.60
Offset=0.000
TOP OF DECK EL.=260.00
Northing=768333.1335
Easting=2101042.1514 j
j
�X
262 261--
7
13+00
r
r/ /X264
i
N
m /
M/
0 20 40 60
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1" = 20'
Y Z Z
tom
� U) L)
W00
4NW 0_
(L/HE��
U W
D
Z
�
J
0
QCLLLJ
l
3 ae
0
(D
0
a
Y Z Z
tom
� U) L)
W00
4NW 0_
(L/HE��
U W
roject No.:
2017.008
ssue or.
CA > REVIEW
0 G�o� Issued Date:
08/18/2017
rawn By. JDG
f � Checked By. TGZ
Sheet No..
D
Z
�
J
0
QCLLLJ
0
roject No.:
2017.008
ssue or.
CA > REVIEW
0 G�o� Issued Date:
08/18/2017
rawn By. JDG
f � Checked By. TGZ
Sheet No..
0
0
0
U
C N
o�
.°
z
roject No.:
2017.008
ssue or.
CA > REVIEW
0 G�o� Issued Date:
08/18/2017
rawn By. JDG
f � Checked By. TGZ
Sheet No..

EXISTING BOARDWALK
TO BE REMOVED
EDGE OF WATER
Bridge 19 Trail — (1) \
E55.24 `\
)0
38156.7847 _
D0926.5043 �� \
i �C53 C
SS
ti61 \
PROPOSED 46,,6LF
SHELLY LAKE
E E
LM
` E Elk EI
E
VtfTI�APIDS� E E
E E
GREENWAY TRAI
Alignment=Bridge 19 Trail (1)
Station=11+85.60 i
Offset -0.000 1
TOP OF DECK EL.=257.50 I
North ing=768254.4049 I I
Easting=2101010.1076
e, \\/ 1 I 1 1 1 , 1
IMPACT 4
BUFFER — TEMP
GREENWAY BRIDGE/TRAIL
ZONE 1 — 1,358 SF
ZONE 2 — 897 SF
PLAN
IMPACT 3
BUFFER — TEMP
REMOVAL OF EXISTING BRIDGE
ZONE 1 — 2,335 SF
ZONE 2 — 1,548 SF
E E \� ,
E �/� E
E E
E E
E E
F E
-117E
�.Alignment=Bridge- 19 Trail (1
2+70.60
. 00
TOP OF DECK EL.=260.00
1 ` 9101042.1514
\E\
10�j\ 1110111�111�1 I I of
X =-
PROPOSED 12'CLEAR
BY 85 FT BRIDGE
0 20 40 80
SCALE: HORIZONTAL I" = 20' <� '
brawn By JDG
Checked By TGZ
1-3
roject No.:
2017.008
ssue old r:
REVIEW
w
Issued Date:
't7�
08 18 2017
VIII
6�
brawn By JDG
Checked By TGZ
1-3
roject No.:
2017.008
ssue old r:
REVIEW
w
Issued Date:
't7�
08 18 2017
brawn By JDG
Checked By TGZ
1-3