100015_INSPECTIONS_20171231

Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
fir& w Division of Water Quality , r"
.:
IXRoutine 0 CompUnt 0 Follow-up of DWO inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other I
Date of Inspection 7 / S 7/7r
L_ Facility Number f
Time of In:speetion 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered *ertified 0 Applied for Permit © Permitted 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .,...�i..n..- ...... .... ,'.......................... County:......./clr'�-jam........ ........,..........
Owner Name:. C4../.?...��.............................+�� .1�� `� ........... Phone No:........:2s�.�..� ����...................................
.........
Facility Contact: OQ i3 I Title: f� .. Phone No: ....................
lbtailin Address j
g ..... ...... rl ........................' `-.,..............................,...... ,.... .............,...................,.....................................•Z,.......
Onsite Representative:.... - A-_q.�1.. ................. �.... .. ...................... Integrator: ....._...........................................................
Certified O erator,.....,..�'� . O erator Certification Number:.. ............... p ' .!� ... .... .......................--......--.._.............. p ............... .....
Location of Farm:
Mac
Nuioaber of Lagoons / Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes JgNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes RNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 51 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 14No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 5j No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Q Yes d No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes .M No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require Z Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes EINo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes 0 No
7/25/97

I
Facility Number:
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
& Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes O No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Flolding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Jallo
Freeboard (ft): S ructure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
YesNo
1-077
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
WYes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
(] Yes
No
-Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
No
(If in excess of r Tnoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop e ............................................:., "...................,..... ......... .........,
p type `
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AV,'W)?
❑ Yes
UNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
RNo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
JZNo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
QNo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
A:U No
21. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
OiNo
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
GNo
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
9 No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
&Yes
JR No
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
r s t
®DWQ AnimaIFeedlaf C}peration Site inspection 3x
. t 4
.C'S[ Routine O ComDlaint O Follow -UP of DWQ inspection O Follo-vv-uo of DSWC review O Other
F— Facility Number
Farm Status: - Gr.Y a L !4 - - -
Date of Inspection r
Time of Inspection Use 24 hr. time
Total Time (in hours) Spent onRevieiv
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farris Natnte: �.�•e-P _ Caunty:
Owner Name: !Ao- let Phone No:.Z2 2 =-L.'#LL,Z.
Mailing Address:�?�-�, \a . '�.v n n�
Onsite Representative: -F, cs r. i p la 4asemA a 14 Integrator:
Certified Operator. e Q Operator Certification Number -
Location of Farm: f1
l I ^y , c S 0
Latitude ar { Longitude • 32 :&
\'ot Operational Date Last Operated: �— —
• r -pe of Operation and Design Capacity
Latitude ar { Longitude • 32 :&
\'ot Operational Date Last Operated: �— —
• r -pe of Operation and Design Capacity
N uiber Poultry .., �s Number ..:,
- _Cattle
Number
❑ Wean to Feeder
IQ Laver I
❑ Dairy
j
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Laver
❑ Bzr:
j
El Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
x y'
Farrow to Finis.
f C.
- ❑ Other Type of Livestock
s
_. ; w
}
Number of Labocrns Y HoldmgPonds ❑ S Drains Pres
ent
..,- ? i SY$"s' zs,:; £ .� ", y x.z y.. ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes C.No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance tnari-made? ❑ Yes 2 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 7❑ No
c. I: discharge is observed, what is the estimated floes in gallmin? t�
d_ Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ©Yes No
1. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pan of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
~ 4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 9 No
S. Does any part of the -ante management syste n (other than lagoonsfhoidin, ponds) require El Yes `o
4 rrainr:nancu'improvement?
Conrinued on Naafi

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 111/97)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons andlor Holding Pondsl
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Frceboard (ft): Lagoon i Lagoon a
LS _
La_oon 3
[[ Yes ($ N o
❑ Yes [KNo
❑ Yes C No
❑ Yes CO No
Lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
2Kio
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑Yes
®No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any -of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
9Yes
❑ No
Waste Anpiication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
01 No
(I£ in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type-
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
Elyes
Fq No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?.
❑ Yes
B No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement? ❑ Yes IS NO
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes N No
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan =diiy available? ❑ Yes RNo
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way? ❑ Yes 19No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes a4NO
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 9No
24. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewimspection with owner or opemcor in charge? ❑ Yes [I NO
Comments (refer to;question 0) E-V am any, Y� answers andlor any recomrr=daaons or zv other comme-t� -
Ilse drawm6 6fiaeiito lietter exgIain sittiattansuse addtuo"ual pages as neeess Nx
v '- @.
i$��-,c / Cs c��IGL' clg Ee r-e ..ems yak, c-1. ezC
csrz S a�e to c-ila wtL W k C- -P- 5 k-a, u La b-e- fa--ZLI'�.
``4 o L'i V I?n e � E71 u v, G t., cc ..1
1 j• iJ vv. C- Yr 2.,� vj p r C g 2 v L
M Sur f k tL 11 ! ei h r,.4 j LA) et S 44- ter. c_ r �,�„ e r. t< c &IL ct
�rr13af-L. dS ��'rC re�a� !�V��:�tr I�..�Qc
- e, e. o .� lj cL b e. r.1 cc +r F c v cv
l/J Ik ✓t', ZL v, $ ✓�� d-✓L C D 1 C• ✓� ` }
Reviewer/Inspector Name _�'i��i 1��=- t�•#�i � ---~- ---- --
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: �1 jy _ _ ,1 Date: F
cc. Division of Water Ounlity, t6ater Quality Section, Facllhy^.45sessment Unir l l/14.96

JUL.-14-1995 15: 2 FRO['
TEEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TOI�IR'C1 P. 02/02
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. O -1
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SFTE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: /1 , 1995
Time: v/ 13•y a
Farm Name/Owner: rf' .✓c� � jy-W - L �Q�'-e -bl- n -
Mailing Address: r C f C giro
County:
Integrator: `� ✓ rl� - Phone: k'
On Site Representative: E�e-nr r_ (,PA Phone:
Physical Address/Location: I I vK, let ( 0
Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle �o'ti+7 2--
Design Capacity: _ 16 ac) Number of Animals on Site: "11� t� ep.., _ 'A,I'r
DEM Certification Number: ACE _ DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ' Longitude: Elevation; Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hoar storm event
(approxirmtely l Foot + 7 inches) or No Actual Freeboard: �—Ft. n_ Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o l o Was any erosion observed? Yes orn:)
Is adequate land available for spray? gel-lZr No is the cover crap adequate? No
Crop(s) being utilized: Co� f
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? e - o
100 Feet from Wells? 4dr No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Ye's or
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or lSi�? if Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste managernent records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes o No
• Vk,aA °
Inspecfe _-Name
Stgnat
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.