Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout100009_INSPECTIONS_20171231t` ❑ US WC Animal Feedlot Operation Review DWO Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection outine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of [AV ) inspection Q Follow-up of DSA C review O Other Date o#° Inspection E: Fs€ei #itr• Number Time of Inspection '>Sj24 hr. (hh:mm) Farm Status: [3 Registered [3 applied for Permit ,Certified 0 Permitted Total Time (in traction of Hours (ex:I.25 for I hr l_5 min)) Spent on Review or Inspection [includes travel and pr(wessing) Not OperationalOperationaLj Date Last Operated: ............... -- ....................................................... ........................................................... ...... Farm Name: 4-..5..!� - County........ ...................................... Owner Name: .... .j?.:. 1.................... ...... .lC`.�F^rc.....................................,. ' Phone No: ..... .q.. .......2...5...E ............. 1 Facility Contact:.. - ..��. ..,e ..............�5......... Title: 4/'�" ��� � Phone No: ....... 1lrtifing lddress:......�......... ...'..%.... ... ..,'a. ....... ..''.9..................................................... ......v................. Onsite Representati`e:,.........................``,✓. .., ... Integrator:,...... ,?((.ram.., .......................,.....,.. Certified Operator:..�"�...i1..i,:1r�...................... . .,%fjf4.1�...................,.............. Operator Certification Nnmber:...J. C�'. ............ Location of Farm: Latitude • 4 •: Longitude • 4 LL Type of Operation Swine Design Current Design Current Capacity- Population Poultry Capacity Population ❑ Layer ❑ Non -Layer Vean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish ❑ Other Total Design Capacity Total SSLW Number of Lagoons I Holding Ponds =:� ❑ Subsurface Drains Present JEI Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area General 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement'? ❑ Yes 59-No 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [] Yes allo Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes EiNo b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes R No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galimin? d. Does discharge bypass a [agoon system'' (If ye, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes JR No 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 91 No 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ER No 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes 21 No 4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? Continued on buck Facility Number: /0 - 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? Structures (LaQgoons and/or Holding Ponds) 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Freeboard (ft): Struc ure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? Waste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? (If in excess of WW.. or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. Crop type .............&. F-........................ I ..... .............. r................................_....................5r.(z, [] Yes allo ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Yes G-No Structure 5 Structure 6 ❑ Yes JgNo ®--Yes ❑ No 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? For Certified Facilities Only 22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? 23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 24. Does record keeping need improvement? -Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes �iNo ❑ Yes EjLNo ❑ Yes UNo ❑ Yes m No 0-Yes ❑ No 0 Yes 0 No ❑ Yes �INo ❑ Yes ULNo ❑ Yes - No ❑ Yes JWo lO Yes 4, No , "(,�jfc f;► Y.U' Y� Ga'% per.► > f/LIJj- �L +` �5�v�-�`cricrh, tht-y-. -Iz2,-,�z . PXA4 Ahlox,,,��, Reviewer/Inspector Name _,4 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit Date: ? - / to --C'"e— 4/30/97 SECTION F.02/02 JUL-14-1935 15:22- FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO Site Requires Immediatc Attention: Facility No. 0 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMEN-T ANUY1AL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD MATE: ___._3,k_' 1995 Time: 47, 0 Farm. Name/Own( Mailing Address: &Oa v' !; S -7 v2 2 '�"i1 �� - , iV C 2S 41 County: _ 6�� as,�uc _ Integrator. _rtil 5 _�,_ _ Phone:, On Site Representative: � r- �v -4 - -_ . Mow - Physical Address/Location: "C-5 (L 13 3 S~ Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle,ov Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: +6 � jv DEM Certification Number ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW_ Latitude: -Y--° _QYLongitude: _2 X ° '' " Elevation: Feet Circle Yes or No Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hoar stone event (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or 0 ,Actual Freeboard: 1 fit. P_ Inches • Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or 10 Was any erosion observed? r No Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No � Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No Crop(s) being utilized: Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings,? es r No 100 Feet from Wells? es r No Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No Is animal waste discharged into waters ofe state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes or(No)) If Yes, Please Explain. Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes oq�_O) Additional Comments: ', a r cr,. 0 !::� V I (0QL_Y1_" Inspector Name cc: Facility Assessment Unit �ff__ _0 � vfln Siang t� \IJ [L Use Attachments if Needed. • Site Requires Immediate Attention: 3P��� Facility No. 10 - IV`=t ISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD DATE: —I— Zo _ 1995 Time: I l l S Farm Name/Owner: G-4 0 Art P S*,-�FIG- N u 1.se f r ee'i D E N1 AA S Mailing Address: County: 6 & %J N s "` t c, ,— Integrator. Phone: On Site Representative: F r lk N k , F- U Ij r� E Phone: Physical Address/Location: Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW Latitude: itLongitude: D' Elevation: Feet Circle Yes or No Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: t_ Inches Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No Crop(s) being utilized: Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No 100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USES Blue Line Stream? Yes or No Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain. Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No Additional Comments: L- lVr-e Q N "+tS 4W r w r^- eF— b P-jQ. vi �,Je__ J.>t Inspector Name Signature cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed_