WQ0016498_Staff Report_20190405

State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
March 28,2019
To: Non-Discharge Unit Application No.: W00016498
Attn: Ranveer Katyal Facility name: Lutterloh Rd Parcel#76317 SFR
County: Chatham
From: Joan Schneier
Raleigh Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non-discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non-
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals Please complete all sections as they are applicable
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or❑No
a. Date of site visit: 02/25/2019
b. Site visit conducted by:
c. Inspection report attached? ❑ Yes or®No
d. Person contacted: n/a and their contact information: (_) ext._
e. Driving directions: Were added in BIMS
2. Discharge Point(s):
Latitude: Longitude:
Latitude: Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
Classification:
River Basin and Subbasin No.
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
H. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit)
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ❑ Yes or❑No
If no, explain:
3. Are site conditions(soils, depth to water table, etc) consistent with the submitted reports? ❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site(property lines,wells, etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑No❑N/A
If no,please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 5

6. Are the proposed application rates(e.g.,hydraulic,nutrient)acceptable? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment,storage and disposal sites? ❑Yes or❑No
If yes,attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
9. For residuals,will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions(Certification B)
Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme:
10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
11. Pretreatment Program(POTWs only):
M.EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs)for the facility? ❑Yes ❑No ®N/A
ORC: Certificate#: Backup ORC: Certificate#:
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ❑ Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
Description of existing facilities: Roughly: Septic Tank,distribution box, sub-surface sand filter, chlorinator,
pump tank,pump, six spray heads,high water alarm, etc
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow: 480 gpd
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know(i.e.,equipment condition, function,maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc.)
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils,topography, depth to water table, etc)maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ®Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit(e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary,new development,etc.)? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes, please explain:
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ®Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates(e.g.,hydraulic,nutrient)still acceptable? ®Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ® Yes or❑No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas. See comments 5 &6.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ®Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no,please explain:
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 WQ0016498 Page 2 of 5

11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no, please complete the following ex and table if necessary):
Monitoring Well Latitude Longitude
O , of O ,
11
O , It O ,
11
O , „ O 1
11
O / „ O , 11
O , 11 O , 11
12. Has a review of all self-monitoring data been conducted(e.g.,DMR,NDMR,NDAR, GW)? ❑ Yes or❑No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: n/a
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes,please explain:
14. Check all that apply:
®No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments(i.e.,NOV,NOD, etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle,please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑ Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no, please explain:
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ❑No ®N/A
If yes,please explain:
16. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:Not likely
17. Pretreatment Program(POTWs only):
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 WQ0016498 Page 3 of 5

IV.REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes,please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non-Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item Reason
n/a
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
II.6 Rain Sensor Original permit predates rain sensor provision
II1.3 Delete cause requiring pine trees. Leave the rest.
111.13 Not on 100 yr floodplain
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
n/a
5. Recommendation: ❑Hold,pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑Hold,pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
❑ Deny(Please state reasons: )
6. Signature of report preparers
Signature of regional supervisor. z
Date:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 WQ0016498 Page 4 of 5

V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
1- The facilty has not been constructed and the lot is undeveloped.
2- The facility lat-long was corrected in BIMS to show an arbitrary location inside the parcel,and should be updated
whenever a house is built.
3- The field lat-long is approximately 35.808900,-79.232675,Nearest 1 second, Map interp,NAD83,and should be
updated whenever the field is built.
4- The Facility address should be updated in BIMS and the SFR name corrected. 75 N Fawn Forest Ln is the correct
mailing address for the permit owners living in a house on the lot next door,with a county administered LPP
system. The lot covered by our permit is undeveloped and does not have an address.A suggested SFR name is on
the top right of page 1.
5- This is one of ten Purvis Land and Timber lots that were permitted at the same time.It is likely that the field is
within the buffers for property lines as follows:
Permit# Purvis Lot# Parcel# Approx.Dist. Permit Date Latest Latest
Field to Deed Recorded
Boundary(ft) Book& Date
from Design
Page
Map
W 0016498 6 76317 n/a 11/01/1999 811-399 11/30/1999
W 0016497 5 76316 60 11/01/1999 1021-339 03/20/2003
W 0016496 4 76315 90 11/01/1999 1884-834 10/07/2016
Waivers are recorded for all properties but without distances.
6- The field, if built in the correct spot, will also likely be within 400 ft of the mobile home at#1724 Lutterloh Rd
(Parcel 76315). It is shown on the GIS as built in 1999, although it is not known whether it was moved to this
location when new. It is very likely that it was not there before the mobile home lot was sold from Purvis Land&
Timber to Edward Weintraub and Joseph Holleman on 12114/1999. Google Earth imagery shows that a structure
showed up in that location sometime between April, 1998 and January 2005, although it is unknown whether it is
the same mobile home. That distance can be verified when the field is built.
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 WQ0016498 Page 5 of 5

WQoorss I(p Hap ®f�.
9724
76316
s
1
76314- ' ��•.�,
76315
---.--50� 109081r-^,�.. I� � '10969 '
t
( .. ' w..!ar • Cf/
f 76317
r
f
,fie.
n 68932lo
75
" ..689331�
76318
N
f Z
_ I
76320
S' q
G. s
y cm� Service Layer Credits: Chatham County,
Chatham County GIS
0 0.0275 0.055
® ay N
8°
�Lun� CHi1THh�1fCQU\fY
�✓"' xoun: Ca No uye
3 Date: 3/28/2019
Time:8:52:38 AM

W Qoo 10 4 W Ida d O'F a PROPERY OWN
b25 i U r� MQf J.ALL PROPEfi
101p9rtP/ N A SURVEY PM
jn=519��`
S05°14' 4.CONTRACTOf
Say°11 'W
184°68' S05014'
,,27.2.1
LIMITS OF AREA
RECOMMENDED FOR SPRAY
IRRIGATION
(SEE SOILS REPORT'`
FULL CIRCLE. NOZZLE (TYP.OF 6) PREPARED BY KARL A SHAD
SEE DETAIL SHEET 14
_ - LOCATION i
=MANUAL Df
W I --_— ;,,LOW POIN7
ED
a °
00
00
117 1-
I
I I
ELEV.500, _— —— _ _J PROPOSED EFFLUENT/
%2".PVC GATE VALVE PUMPING CHAMBER
° 9 W W/ VALVE BOX 3000 -GALLON
(TYP.OF&8) SRTC PT I56
N W L®$CO(Ai ,q S^6�z SEE, DETAIL SHEET 13
2 STRANDS BARB WIRE
FENCE AROUND PERIMETER.
TREATED 2X4 POSTS /O'O.C.