670001_HISTORICAL_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qua'

PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number:
Facility Name:
67-01
Onslow Farm
County:
Onslow
Certified Operator Name: Marshall Phillips Operator Number:
28714
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
2. Check all applicable items
18
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section 111 tables.' Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operabon will be partially or fully depopulated.
'Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible. date to begin land application of waste: as conditions permit
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the Information is
accurate and correct.
M and A Phillips Phone:
n Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date: 2/26/2016
ler (signature)

It. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ANDIOR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure ID: Onslo
line m =
Ib PAN
2. Structure ID: Lagoon 2
line m =
88.0 Ib PAN
3. Structure ID:
line m =
Ib PAN
4. Structure ID:
line m =
Ib PAN
5. Structure ID:
tine m =
Ib PAN
6. Structure ID:
line m =
Ib PAN
n. lines 7 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 88.0 lb PAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOn-
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 3367.2 Ib. PAN
N. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = 88.0 Ib. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance pine v from section III) = 3367.2 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -3 779 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelldentifier (ID): Lagoon 2
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
16.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr_ storm & structural freeboard
-19.0 inches
c_ line b - line a (inches in red zone) =
1.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
100660 ftz
e, line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallonslft3
62745 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 149 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design Z62576 ft3
h. current herd # ® certified herd # 11295
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated I i 0/5/2015
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
fe
�03
153007 ft3
230435 gallons
0.30 1bs11000 gal.
88.0 lbs. PAN

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, Norlh Carolina 29405
[phone]
FILE ACCESS RECORD
SECTION
TEYWATE Co
NAIL ,-,a �. -. � Pk ([ i PS
Guidelines for Access: The staff of Wilmington Regiona.I Office is dedicated to making public records in
our custodyreadily available to the public for review and copying. We also have the responsibility to the
Public to safeguard these records and to carry out our day-to-day program obligations. Please read
carefully the following guidelines signing the form:
f . Due to the large public demand for file access, we request thatyou call at least a day in
advance to schedule an appointment to review the files. Aimek ments w0l be scheduled
between 9:00am and 3:00bm. Viewing time ends at 4:45pm. Auvone arrmwz without an
appoigtwent maj view the files to the extent that time and staff supervision is available._
2. You must specify files you want to review by fadlity name. The number of files that you
may review at one time will be limited to five.
3. You may make copies of a file when die copier is not in use by the staff and if time permits.
Cost per copy is $.05 cents. PayMent My be made by check, money order, or cash at the
reie Pion desk. Copies t€s $S00 or more can be invoiced foryoar convenience.
4. F.IIM MUST l3E KEPT IN ORDER YOU FOUND THEM ' Files may not be taken from
the office. To remove, alter, defhc-,mutilaft, or destroy material in one of d=u files is a
misdemeanor for which you can be fined up to $500,00. No briefcases, large totes, etc. are
permitted in the file review area -
In accordance with General Statue 25-3-512, a $25.00 processing fee will be charged and
coIlected.for checks on which payment has been refused
FACILITY NAME COUNTY
3.
Signature and Name of nm/Business Date Time In Time out
Pieria attach a bu&vss card to this form
COPIES MADE� PAd r Z INVOICE
S:Admiri file access

PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 67-01
County: Onslow
Facility Name: Onslow Farm
Certified Operator Name: Marshall Phillips Operator Number:
AWA26714
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
19 28 19
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
x Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
'Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
"if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: as conditions permit
I hereby certify that 1 have reviewed the Information listed above and Included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct
Marshall Philli s Phone: [phone]
Facility OwnerlM nag r ( rint)
Date: 3/6/2015
Facility Owner/Manager (signat )

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ANDfOR 25 YRd24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: Lagoon 1-Primary
line m =
lb PAN
2.
Structure ID: Lagoon 3 - S
line m =
393.2 lb PAN
3.
Structure ID: Lagoon 4 - Primag
line m =
lb PAID
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 393.2 lb PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
•
• _ _ -
• • •
�_ •'
�FIELD
TOTAL PAN
•'
..
colurnnrxs
-M
--
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 1118.9 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = 393.2 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section Ill) = 1118.9 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -726 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelldentifier (ID): 1 Lagoon -Primary
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural Freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) _
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallonslft3
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
19.0 inches
19.0 inches
inches
144324 fe
gallons
f. temporary storage period according to structural design ®days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design Oft3
h. current herd # certified herd #r
actual waste produced = current nerd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i +j) x 7.48 x 30 daysAine f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. currenfwaste analysis dated 1 2/10/2015
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100
ft'
�ft3
W
gallons
0.29 Ibs11000 gal.
0 lbs. PAN

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelidentifier (ID): I Lagoon 3 - S
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 28.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 34.8 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 6.8 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 100660 ftz
e, line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallonslff' 426664 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 90 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 26001D ft3
h. current herd # 3000 certified herd #1 3000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 260010 ft'
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
1. current waste analysis dated I 2/10/2015
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00
�ft3
153006 ft3
1029787 gallons
0.27 Ibs/1000 gal.
393.2 lbs. PAN

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL. PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure NameAdentifier (ID): Lagoon 4 : Primary
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 19.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr, storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone),= inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 33210 ftz
e, line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 90 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design Oft3
h. current herd # 0 certified herd #Q
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lanes h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f-
J
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated I 2110/2015
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
ft3
�ft3
�ft3
gallons
0.27 Ibs/1000 gal,
0 lbs. PAN

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Pat McCrory
Governor
M and A Phillips, LLC
Onslow Farm
903 Wards Bridge Rd
Warsaw, NC 28398
Dear-M and A Phillips, LLC:
Donald R. van der Vaart
RECEIVED/NCOENR/AWretary
September 25, 2015 SEP 3 0 2015
Water Quality Regional
operations Section
Wilmin on Reeg�ional Office
Subject: Certificate of Coverage lo. AWS670001
Onslow Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Onslow County
In accordance with your September 24, 2015 request to change operation type without exceeding the
permitted steady state live weight, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC)
issued to M and A Phillips, LLC, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management
system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) for Onslow Farm, located in Onslow County, with a swine animal capacity of no greater than
the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 11,295 Feeder to Finish: Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is -a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
This COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2019, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS670001 dated October 1, 2014. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and- limitations as specified
in ' the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and
maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility.
Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals
authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and
must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit carefully. Please pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this hermit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Phone: [phone] Internet: hftp:/Awm.ncwater.org
m.ncwater.org
An Equal ODoodunity l A6firrn*m Action EDmlover — Made in Dart by meveled oaDer

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under thj st peimit,conveyfany;property rights in either real or personal property.
Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon,
storage pond; `or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be-advised,that�any ;violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the QA`WW ftid desalt in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-2f5.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Program for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition 11.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You may
find detailed watch/waming information for your county by calling the Newport/Morehead City, NC
National Weather . Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at:
bU://www.weather.gov/mhx/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office staff
may be reached at 910-796-7215. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General
Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
J�
S. ]ay Zimmerman, P.G.
Director, Division of Water Resources
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Onslow County Health Department
Onslow County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files (Permit No. AWS670001)

A7 �i.�
-
NCDENR
: Norhf C-aroiine=Department of -Environment and Naturaa-Resourcesr- -_- -
Division of Water Quality -
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor director Secretary
February 10, 2011
Russell Wood
Cypress Creek Farms
721 Honeycutt Rd
-Willow Spring, NC 27592
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS67000I
Cypress Creek Farms
Animal Waste Management System
Onslow County
Dear Russell Wood:
The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge survey information on January 7,
2011. With the survey results, Jonathan Miller from Agriment Services Inc, on your behalf
requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement for lagoon #2 at Cypress Creek Farms
facility. Due to the amount of treatment volume -available, and the rate of sludge accumulation
for the lagoon, the Division feels that an extension is not appropriate for lagoon #2 at this time.
The next sludge survey for lagoon #2 at Cypress Creek Farms facility should be performed
before December 31, 2011. Thank you foryour attention to this matter. - Please call me at (919)
715-6937 if you have any questions. Xz
Sincerely,
By.
FEB 1 4 20it
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Jonathan Miller, Agriment Services Inc, PO Box 1096, Beulaville, NC28518
Permit File AWS670001
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1636
Lucation: 2728 Capital aiv ., Ral=iah. North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone]'11 FAX: [phone]F.1 Customer Sptvic-: 1-2, 7-623-n748
Intem,t: www nrwatpmrrA!irr nm
One
North Carolina
Naturalllf .
,j cnual C)r.'x7, unisv } Aymria'mv Action -mwove•

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE 2/25/2010
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): Cypress Creek 67-1 .67-1 J
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 19.0 inches
b. designed 25 y024 hr. storm & structural freeboard 30.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 11.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 103950 ftz
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/W 712751 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 317202 fe
h. current herd # 3000 certified herd #1 3000
actual waste produced = current herd # • x line g = 317202 ft'
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + D x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 9/17/2010
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
!-�J ft3
153006 ft3
586193 gallons
0.45 lbs/1000 gal.
594.5 lbs. PAN
OCT 01 2010
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00
9/30/2010

IL TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure ID: Cypress Creels 67-1
line m =
554.5 lb PAN
2. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines1+2+3+4+5+6= 584.5lbPAN
111. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD-
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(Ib/acre)
L TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (Ibs.)
column r x s
u. applicauon window'
1796
12
Overseed Rye
2.07
50.00
103.5
se t15-oct30
1796
13
Overseed Rye
2.61
50.00
130.5
se t15-act30
1796
14
Overseed Rye
4.29
50.00
214.5
se t15-oct30
1796
15
Overseed Rye
2.98
50.00
149.0
se t15-oct30
'State current crop ending application date or next Crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 597.5 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY`S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 584.5 lb. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section Ill) = 597.5 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -13 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00 9/30/2010

Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN based
on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these fields to the
PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to another permitted
facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the receiving facility.
PoA (30 Day) 2121100 9/30/201

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal ''Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
ryPrF.,ss Greek Farmv
Russel. Wood
402 Coston Rd
Richlands, 1VC 28574
919-639-2926
09-05-2008
This plan has been developed by:
Carl .Jrt mm
DSWC Wa RO
943 Washington Sq Mall
Wu&hinglun, NC 27889
252-946-6481 APR X 4 Z009
Dcvoloper Signaam
RECEIVED ! DENR ! DWQ
1'ype of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only Ag11i€pr PrntP.&10i1 Z*VUVri ...
APR 0 6 2009
Owner/Manager/Producer ,Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
Signature (owner)
Signature (irinager or producer)
Date
Dare
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Bernice or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Appro-ved By: ` -Y , _-9 5,-0 $
Technical Specialist Signature Date
............................................................................................. .:.................... --. -- -----------•---•--•---
PrFviPw TbnhaiP VPrsirm 11 Nat, mnttrl- f14c15anfia r nurr Pip I

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S9
Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Liquid waste generated 9,609,000
gals/year by a 3,000 animal Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Liquid
operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of
approximately 90 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
14828
Incorporated
25466
Injected
28045
Irrigated
16118
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
16,215
13,741,973
-4,132,973
-- -- -- -------- ---- -
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
549633 Database Version 1,08 Date Printed: 04-07-2004 Source Page 1 of ]

Narrative
The land and crops contained within this plan are from a previous plan. This plan was developed for
wettable acre issues. Thus, the PAN values for this plan come directly from the previous plan.
Note ****
The plan uses a combination of Fescue in some f"ieilds with Bermuda/Overseed in others. Fescue was put
in the fields where Bermuda did not fair as well. However, if Bermuda/Overseed were planted on the
entire farm, the overall PAN deficit could be much greater than its current value.
------------------------------------------------------•----- -----------------------------------------
544633 Database Version 1.0; Date Printed: 04-07-2004 Narrative Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic
CYield estimates are also provided for each crap in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown.
:where avai lab le.
r .:
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable Leaching
Acres Index (U)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1796
12
2,07
2.07 NIA
Autryville
Cereal/Annual Rye OIS, Hay417 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
1796
13
2.61
2.61 N/A
Autryville
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
1796
14
4.29
4.29 NIA
Autryville
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagmss Hay
5.5 Tons
1796
15
2.98
2.98 NIA
Autryville
Cereal/Annual Rye OIS, Hay-4n Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
1796
Z 3
0.97
0.97 NIA
Autryville
Cereal/Annual Rye OlS, Hay-4/7 Harvest
2,0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
1796
Z 4
0.97
0.97 NIA lAutryville
Ccrcal/Annual Rye 01S, Hay-4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
1796
Z 5
0.97
0.97 NIA
Autryville
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
?,5 Tons
1796
Z 6
1 0.48
0.48 NIA
Autryville
Cereal/Annual Rye 01S, Hay4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3197
1
3.15
3. l5 NIA
Foreston
Fescue Hay
4,0 Tons
3197
10
2.61
2.61 N/A
Foreston
Cereal/Annual Rye 019, Hay4l7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Berniudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3197
11
5.99
5.99 NIA
Foreston
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
3197
2
3.57
3,57 NIA
Foreston
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
3197
3
3,32
3.32 NIA
Foreston
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
3197
4
3,28
3.28 NIA
Foreston
Fescue Hay
4-0 Tons
3197
5
2.94
2.94 N/A
Foreston
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tans
3197
6
3.581
3.58 NIA
Foreston
Cereal/Annual Rye OIS, Hay417 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3197
E
3.13
3.13 NIA
Foreston
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Ber nudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3197
9
2.59
2.59 NIA
Foreston
Cereal/Annual Rye OIS, Hay4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3197
Z 1
1.30
1.30 NIA
Foreston
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
3197-
Z 2
0.78
0.78 NIA
Foreston
Cereal/Annual Rye OIS, Hay-417 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
549633 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed 4/7/2004
PCs Page I of 2

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
3197
Z 7
0.78
0.78
NIA
Foreston
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
3197
Z 8
1.30
1.30
N/A
Foreston
Cereal/Annual Rye OIS, Hay-4/7 Harvest
1.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: 53.66 53.66
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<= 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the root
zo ne.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
improve the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency
> 10
should be considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based
Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter
Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
549633 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed 4/7/2004
PCS Page 2 of 2

i'
w1� .
The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number o�cres of . .
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure ci'r
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year t
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Reqd
(Ibs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(1bs1A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
ManureA.
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1796
12
S9
Autryville
2.07
2.07
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
1011-3131
100
0
0
Irrig,
100
59,62
0.00
123.41
0.00
1796
12
S9
Autryville
2.07
2.07
Bermudagrass flay
5.5 Tons
311-9/30
*275
0
0
Irrig.
275
163.95
0.00
339.38
0.00
1796
13
S9
Autryville
2.61
2.61
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Flay-4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
1011-3/31
100
1 0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
0.00
155.60
0.00
1796.
13
S9
Autrvviile
2.61
2.61
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*275
0
0
Irrig.
275
163,95
0.00
427.91
0.00
1790
14
S9
Autryville
4.29
4.29
Cereal/Annual Rye OIS, Hay-4/7 Harvest
2.0'rons
loll-3131
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
0.00
255.76
0,00
1796
14
S9
Autryville
4.291
4.29
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 `tons
311-9130
*275
0
0
Irrig.
275
163.95
0.00
703.34
0.00
1796
15
S9
Autryville
2.98
2.98
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4/7 harvest
2.0 Tons
1011-3131
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
U.00
177,66
0,00
1796
15
S9
Autryville
2.98
2.98
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*275
0
0
Irrig,
275
10.95
0.00
488.57
0.00
1796
Z 3
S9
Autryville
0.97
0.97
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
30/1-3/31
too
0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
0.00
57.83
0,00
1796
Z 3
S9
Autryville
0.97
0.97
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*275
0
0
hrig.
275
163.95
0.00
159.03
0,00
1796
Z 4
S9
Autryville
0.97
0.97
CereallAnnual Rye 01S, Hay4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
100
0
0
Inig.
100
59.62
0.00
57.83
0.00
1796
Z 4
S9
Autryville
0.97
0.971
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
311-9130
*275
0
0
Inig.
275
163.95
0.00
159.03
0.00
1796
z 5
S9
Autryvi0e
0.97
0.97
Cereal/Annual Rye OlS, flay-4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
10/1.3?31
too
0
0
hTig.
100
59.62
0.00
57.83
0.00
1790
Z 5
S9
Autryville
0.97
0.97
Bermudagrass Hay
3.5'rons
3/1-9/30
*275
0
0
In-ig.
275
163.95
0.00
159,03
0.00
1796
"Z
S9
Autryville
0.48
0.48
Cereal/Annual Rye OIS, hay-4!7 Harvest
2.0 "funs
1011-3131
100 ..
0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
.0.00
28.62
0.00
1796
L G
59
Aut yvillc
U.48
(1,48
flcrn�udagrass Hay
5.5 Toos
311-9/30
*275
0
fl
Irrig. 1
275
163.95
0.00
78.70
000
549633 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 4/7/2004 WUT Pale I of 3

Waste UtiIi:. a"I
Table ` • '.''' a 1 '
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)-
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbsIA)
Applic
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pphed
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
1000
galIA
Tons
1000gals
tons
3197
l
S9
Foreston
3.15
3,15
Fescue Hay
4.0Ton s
811-7131
*200
0
0
Irrig.
20C
119.24
0.00
375.59
0.00
3197
10
S9
Foreston
2.61
2.61
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-417 Harvest
2.0 Tons
1011-3/31
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
0.00
155.60
0.00
3197
10
S9
Foreston
2.61
2.61
Berrnudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
311-9130
*300
0
0
Irrig.
300
178.85
0,00
466.81
0.00
3197
11
S9
Foreston
5.99
5.99
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
811-7/31
*200
0
0
Brig.
200
119.24
0.00
714.22
0.00
3197
2
S9
Foreston
3.57
3.57
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
*200
0
0
Irrig.
200
119.24
0.00
425.67
0.00
3197
3
S9
Foreston
3.32
3.32
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
811-7/31
*200
0
0
Irrig.
200
1 f9.24
0.00
395.86
0.00
3197
4
S9
Foreston
3.28
3.28
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
811.7/31
*200
0
0
Irrig.
20C
119.24
0.00
391.10
0.00
3397
5
S9
Foreston
2.94
2.94
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
811-7/31
*200
0
0
Irrig-
200
119.24
0.00
350.56
0.00
3197
6
S9
Foreston
3.58
3.58
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4/7 Harvest
2,0 Tons
1011-3131
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
0.00
213.43
0.00
3197
6
S9
Foreston
3.58
3.58i
Berrnudagimss Hay
6.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*300
U
0
Irrig..
300
178.85
0.00
640.30
0.00
3197
8
S9
Foreston
3.13
3.13
Cereal/Annual Rye OIS, I1ay-4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
0.00
186.60
0.00
3197
8
S9
Foreston
3.13
3.13
Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*300
0
0
Irrig.
300
178.85
0.00
559.81
0.00
3197
9
S9
Foreston
2.59
2.59
Cercal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
10/1-3131
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
0.001
154.41
0.00
3197
9
S9
Foreston
2.59
2,59
Berniudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
311-9130
*300
0
0
Irrig.
300
178.85
0.00
463.23
0.00
3197
Z 1
S9
Foreston
1.30
L30
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
811-7131
*200
0
0
Irrig.
200
119.24
0.00
155.01
0.00
3197
Z 2
S9
Foreston
0.79
0.78
CereallAnnual Rye O/S, Hay-417 Harvest
2.0 Tons
1011-3/31
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
0.00
46.50
0.00
3197
Z 2
S9
Foreston
0.78
0.78
Bermudagrass Hay
6,0 Tons
311-9/30
*300
0
0
Irrig.
300
178.95
0.00
139.51
0.00
3197
Z 7
S9
Foreston
0.78
0.78
Fescue flay
4.0 Tons
8l1-7/31
*200
0
0
lrlig.
200
119.24
0.00
93.00
0.00
3197
Z 8
S9
Foreston
1.34
1.30
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4/7 Harvest
2.0'1'ons
1011-3/31
100
0
0
Irrig
100
59.62
0.00
77.50
0.04
3197
7-8
S9
FnrEston
1.30
L30
Bermudagrass flay
6.0'1'oris
3l1-W30
*300
0
0
fn-ig.
300
179.85
0.00
232.51
0.00
549633 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 4/7/2004 WUT Page 2 of 3

Waste Utill: Table
itrugen
Comm.
Res,
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fen.
(ibs1A)
PA
ManureA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
Nutrient
pplied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
([bs1A)
(Ibs/A)
(]bs/A)
iD00
Source
Tots]
Use.
Applic.
Applic.
Tract
Field
ID
Soil Series
Acres
Acres
Crop
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
9,666.77
V4'
9,609.00
' _'?'>�
-57.77Ii'
1`)
0.00
S
0.00
jo-00
�z
.
Notes: 1. In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
549633 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 41712004 WUT Pagc 3 of 3

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies
with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must applyat a rate that will not result in
1' 9
runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to
receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field inay receive in any one application
event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
1796
12
Autryville
0.60
1.0
1796
13
Auuyville
0.60
1.0
1796
14
Autryville
0.60
1.0
1796
15
Autryville
0.60
1.0
1796
Z 3
Autryville
0.60
1.0
1796
Z 4
Autryville
0.60
1.0
1796
Z 5
Autryville
0.60
1.0
1796
Z 6
Autryville
0.60
1.0
3197
1
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
10
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
11
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
2
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
3
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
4
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
5
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
6
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
8
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
9
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
Z 1
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
Z 2
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
Z 7
lForeston
0.50
1.0
3197
Z 8
Foreston
0.50
1.0
549633 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed 4/7/2004 IAF Page 1 of 1
)un-rv. 0.... i-i k .......................t..-A ..I.....

The following lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the numberof acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number ofanimals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases. the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lblac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gallac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Sludge - Standard
am 120 bu
150
13.16
88.89
177.79
266.68
H,y 6 ton R.Y.F.
300
26.32
44.45
88.89
133.34
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
83.34
166.68
250.02
----------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- —1-- • -- -g.- --
549633 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 04-07-2004 Sludge Page 1 of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Canacitv
Source Name
I Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity ays)
Start Date
01/01
90
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
-192
!
2
-182
t
3
!31
l
4
-104
1
5
-78
1
6
-51
1
7
-38
1
8
25
1
9
-13
10
-6
1
11
2
1
12
-17
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
--------------------- ---------------------- ------------------------•------------------------ --- - -- --- . .......... --.
549633 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 04-07-2004 Capacity Page 1 of I

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 10, 6, 8, 9, Z 2, Z 8
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Effective artificial drainage MUST be in place to achieve Realistic Yield Expectations
provided for these soils.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bulac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcastldisked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 1001b/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 11, 2, 3, 4, 5, Z 1, Z 7
Fescue: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Moderate to Marginal.
In the Coastal Plain, tall fescue can be planted Sept. I to Oct. 15 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Tall fescue will tolerate soil wetness but not flooding or prolonged saturation; use
ladino clover for mixtures on these soils. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and
potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 601b/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply
N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 2001b/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
- -- ------ ------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------- —----------- ------ -----------
549G33 Database Version 1.0: Date Printed: 04-07-2004 Crop Note Page l of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 10, 6, 8, 9, Z 2, Z 8
Cereal/Annual Rye Overseeded — Hay
CEREAL RYE
The cereal rye should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth. The
most consistent stands are obtained from drilling rye into short (less than 3 inches tall) bermudagrass sod.
If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short bermuda sod followed by a light
cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds should be
1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda
prior to .August 31. An application of 50 lbs/acre of Plant Available N (PAN) may be applied between
September 15 and October 30. An additional 50 lbs.acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If
rye growth is harvested on time and does not significantly shade the bermuda, PAN rates for the
subsequent Bermuda crop are based on realistic yields of bermuda. A harvest is required prior to heading
or April 7, which ever comes first. This is necessary to minimize the potential for shading bennuda and
reducing its yields.
ANNUAL RYEGRASS
Annual ryegrass should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth.
The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling ryegrass into short (less than 3 inches tall)
bermudagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short bermuda sod followed
by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds
should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the
bermuda prior to August 31. An application of 50 lbs/acre of PAN may be applied behveen September
15 and October 30. An additional 50 lbs. acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If additional
PAN is applied to the ryegrass in April -May, the PAN rate for the bermuda must be reduced by a
corresponding amount. This is necessary because ryegrass growth during April -May will reduce
bermuda yields and shorten the time bermuda can fully utilize the N. A harvest is required by heading or
April 7, which ever comes first to prevent shading of emerging bermuda during April -May period. To
favor the production of the bermuda, additional harvests of ryegrass will be required when the ryegrass
canopy reaches 12 to 15 inches height.
--------------------------------------------- - - ------ ---- -----.
549633 Database Version 1.0: Date Printed: 04-07-2004 Crop Note Page 2 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 12, 13, 14, 15, Z 3, Z 4, Z 5, Z 6
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
------------- - ­---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- -----
549633 Database Version 1.0: Date Printed: 04-07-2004 Crop Note Page 3 of 4

The following crop note applies to tield(s): 12, 13, 14, 15, Z 3, Z 4, Z 5, Z 6
Cereal/Annual Rye Overseeded — Hay
CEREAL RYE
The cereal rye should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth. The
most consistent stands are obtained from drilling rye into short (less than 3 inches tall) bermudagrass sod.
If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short bermuda sod followed by a light
cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds should be
1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the berinuda
prior to August 31. An application of 50 lbs/acre of Plant Available N (PAN) may be applied between
September 15 and October 30. An additional 50 lbs.acre of PAN may be applied in February-1Vlarch. If
rye growth is harvested on time and does not significantly shade the bermuda, PAN rates for the
subsequent bermuda crop are based on realistic yields of bermuda. A harvest is required prior to heading
or April 7, which ever comes first. This is necessary to minimize the potential for shading bennuda and
reducing its yields.
ANNUAL RYEGRASS
Annual ryegrass should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth.
The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling ryegrass into short (less than 3 inches tall)
bermudagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short bermuda sod followed
by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds
should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the
bermuda prior to August 31. An application of 50 lbs/acre of PAN may be applied between September
15 and October 30. An additional 50 ibs. acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If additional
PAN is applied to the ryegrass in April -May, the PAN rate for the bermuda must be reduced by a
corresponding amount. This is necessary because ryegrass growth during April -May will reduce
bermuda yields and shorten the time bermuda can fully utilize the N. A harvest is required by heading or
April 7, which ever comes first to prevent shading of emerging bermuda during April -May period. To
favor the production of the bermuda, additional harvests of ryegrass will be required when the ryegrass
canopy reaches 12 to 15 inches height.
-- ------------ - •----------•-•---------- .
549633 Database Version 1.0:' Date Printed: 04-07-2004 Crop Note Page 4 of 4

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied -to land eroding less than 5, tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided. the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------�- ---------.�.--_�--- -
549633 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 04-07-2004 Specification Page l of 4

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner:
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right--of-ways.
--- -----------------------------------1--------- - ---------------. - --,------- - -
549633 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 04-07-2004 Specification Page 2 of 4

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
----------- ---------------------------- ------ ----------------------------------- I-- --------- ---------- ------------------
549633 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 04-07-2004 Specification Page 3 of 4

21. .Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste'shall be maintained for a
minimum of five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
---------------------- -- -------_---------------------- ---------------------------------------------- - ----
549633 Database Version 1.09 Date Printed: 04-07-2004 Specification Page 4 of 4

O�0F W AL, /;q Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
> i
p Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 1, 2007
Cypress Creek Farms Inc
Cypress Creek Farms
721 Honeycutt Rd
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS670001
Cypress Creek Farms
Animal Waste Management System
OnsloW County
Dear Cypress Creek Farms Inc:
In accordance with your application received on 11-Jun-07, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Cypress Creek Farms Inc, authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Cypress Creek Farms, located in Onslow County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 0 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 3000 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition 111.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record' keeping and reporting. Please pay
careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwatMualitv.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recyded D% Post Consumer Paper
Nam` Carolina
tura!!y
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0111(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection staff may be reached at 910-395-3900. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at (919) 733-
3221.
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Onslow County Health Department
Onslow County Soil and Water Conservation District
Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS670001

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
June 10, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Cypress Creek Farms, Inc.
402 Coston Road
Richlands NC 28574
Re: Request for Information
Sludge Survey Report
Cypress Creek Farms
NCA267001
Onslow County
Dear Cypress Creek Farms, Inc.:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
This letter is to notify you that the subject facility is in violation of its General Permit
NCA267001 Condition 1111.16.
Your NPDES Permit Number NCA267001 Condition I1I.16 states:
"All facilities, which are issued a COC to operate under this permit, shall conduct a
survey of the sludge accumulation in all lagoons within one (1) year of receiving the
COC and every year thereafter. This survey shall include but not be limited to a sketch
showing the depth of sludge in the various locations within each lagoon. This survey
shall be submitted as part of the facility's annual report in the year it was conducted.
This survey frequency may be reduced if it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the
Division that the rate of sludge accumulation does not warrant an annual survey.
If the sludge accumulation is such that it is greater than the volume for which the lagoon
was designed or reduces the minimum treatment volume to less than the volume for
which the lagoon was designed, a plan must be submitted to the Division's Central Office
within ninety (90) days of this determination which documents removal and waste
utilization procedures to be used."
Our records indicate that the Division has not received the sludge survey results for the year
2004 from your facility. The form was due March 1, 2005. To avoid possible enforcement
,action for a violation of your permit, please submit the results within thirty (30) days to the
following address:
tCarolina
ura!!y
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAffirma&e Action Employer- 50% Recydedl10% Post Consumer Paper

Cyp%Rr, Creek, Farms, Inc.
Page 2
6/ 10/2005
Keith Larick
Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statue or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone] or the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
lz-�' -e e,
Keith Larick
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: File 67-1
Wilmington Regional Office

Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
Please type or Lnnt aH information that does not require a signature) 3
or New or E anded ' -( lease circle one)
General Information:
Name. of Farm:, Ne,-i off Fg« s (jAG _Facility No:
Owner(s) Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address:_ _ 13 o_ Soy _ --- C e4yl_d illf. NC e261SY
Farm Location: Courit� Farm is located in:
Latitude and Longitude: / Integrator:
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.):
Operation Descri tion:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
a Wean to Feeder
© Feeder to Finish
1Farrow to Wean 3 0 b
C Farrow to Feeder
:J Farrow to Finish
• Gilts
• Boars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
© Layer
ti Non -Laver _
Type of Beef No. of Animals
a Brood
C1 Feeders
G Stockers
Orher Type of Livesrock:
Type of Dairy
❑ Milking
❑ Dry
❑ Heifers
• Calves
No. of Aninrals
Alumber of Animals:
Expanding Operation Only
Previous Design Caaacin�: _ Additional Design Capacin-: Total Design Capacit .: "
Acreage Available for Application: Rcquired Acreage:
Number of lagoons I Storage Ponds: Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (0)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPR.kY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner / Manager Agreement
I(we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. i (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage
system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from the
storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or from a -storm
event less severe than the 25-year. 24-hour storm and there roust not be run-off From the application of animal waste. I (we)
understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical standard,
developed by the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). The approved -plan will be filed at the farm and at
the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a
technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land
ownership requires written notification to DWQ or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a
title transfer.
Name of
Signature:
Name of IN
(if different from owner):
Sianatu re: Date:
ep
a w r' ._ l�or,embcr :. 2t}AU I

Technical Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005,-I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Water Quality as specified in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements are
included in the plan as applicable. NVhile each category designates a technical specialist who may sign each certification (SD,
SI, WUP, RC, I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically competent.
I.I. Cer ficat on of Desigrx
A): Collection. Storage. Treatment S stern
Check the appropriate bar
C5' Existing facility without. retrofit (SD or'VVUP) 11
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization requirements.
❑ New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): _l,�/� it t-4 WA Ca.l Q t' ..'
Affiliation N C 0 E u R 054 c Date Work Completed: 3- t0- v 4
Address (Agency): `€`€1 4r4XV'4 4a.% � � NC 2? f Yq Phone No.:? 4`tb 64g l
Signature: �✓/%` � Date: 3-In- o 4
a
? NL $
B) Land Application Site (WTV- The plan provides for minimum seMt�t/#te amount of ]and for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste manaeemenr, hvdr4yr 6 d7n+ iv t nQ rates.
G
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation u( t) E u R OS w C
Address (Agencv):
Signature: ti
to Work Completed: 3 -10 - 0 Lt
tf i7^ . a
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate bon ?4• • `'
F a�qAA '4.es- ',
P'��9 I:l �i'6lW Ak a
❑ Facility without exterior lots (SD or WiJ>`'�"tt� ;
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Phone No.:
1-10- D 4t
❑ Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by N-RCS-
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Wort: Completed:
Address (Agency):
SiL nature:
AWC -- December:, 2060
2
hone No.:
Datc:

D). AMlication and Handling Equipment
Check the appropriate boar ,
0 Existing or ex�andins facility with existing wast�vlication eguil2ment' (Wt ]? or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either -field calibrate_ d or evaluated its accordance
with existing. design charts and tables .and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste
management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed
either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been established;
required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the,plan).'
a New; exvandod .or�existing.faoilitv without.,e.xisiing-.waste�avilkati�st goingmentfsii spr'av:'irrigatios.' (i)
Animal waste applicatiari equipti►ent. specified in [he plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application' equipmerent can covthe area required' by the .plan
at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for tinting of applications
has been established: required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part.
of the plan).
New. expanded. or existina_facility .withoui existing waste application equipment for land_spreading.not using spray
irrigation. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan
at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications
has been established: required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part
of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print)-,,..;.,w, Ali+a ca,1
Affiliation_- NI 0ENR S `" 4 Of ��s°"F Date Worst Completed: 3-10-o4
Address (.Agency): C��� Phone No.:
Signature: �' ?� fir' P.P.4 Date: 3-to- oy
E) Odor Control. Insect Control, �1�I I .` dii�§- -and Eimer,2enev Action Plan, (SD,
SL WUP. RC or I) E rat �la���,�,,�
The waste management plan for this facility inc"11' i:VY I ante Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect Control
Checklist, a Nlortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and insects have
been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best Management
Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the Mortality.
Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by [his facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):`
Affiliation VC
Address (Agency):
Signature:_ u� 2
Work Completed: 3-10 -o y
Phone No.:
3--w • o y
Y
F) Written Notice of New or ExAdM Smine r e
The following signature block is only to b6' ' �ixe .4 *ding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built.before 3urfe,;�i;� t.iRkas it constructed or last expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contacje,t nidit3d mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners who
own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was in
compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manaaer (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- December 5. 2000

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, Storage. Treatment Installation
_New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed in
accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of TechnicalSpecialist (Please, Print):
Affiliation' Date Work Coipleted:
Address (Agency): Phone No.: IV ' N
Signature: Date: AQLSALI
MAR
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
(ypIyAlSC1iA Mkow"N4
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation PC DF Np
Address (Agency):
Signature: �^'-•-
C)
02458?
n:
W'IIta— 6-a.1 Dw,..
Work Completed:
Phone No.:
3-to- oy
Date:_ 3-10- Ott -
Facility with exterior Iots '>.
•. �coosa �'
' ��
Methods to minimize the run off of'pr� r f t �nging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified in
the plan. �Prisliti4,•�a`
Far facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) Application and Handling Equipment Installation (WUP or I)
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on spte and ready for use; calibration
and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has nor.been installed but the owner has
proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the
contract agreeswiththe requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained: calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
4tl i;yelEl:?
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation IJC
Address (Agency): �
Stgnature; , Wl
AWC -- December :. 2000
C,24581
i n u
�'.
J1101
Work Completed:
_ Phone No.:
z___!Date: 3- la - O Lf

E) Odor_ Control. Insect -Control and Mortality Management. (SD, SL WUP, RC or I)
Methods to control. odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality manaaemerit system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print: CAII I' %%•O%
si`• ::� 'per
Affiliation NL D E NR ,ti`' ,+3��`'f,. Date Work Completed:. ),-10-04
Address (Agency): •� ��°.ti ��1�a a� Phone No.:
Signature:
3—ra- oy
Q &5� =
o ff�a� M
Please return the completed font o�I,v '�gl ��Water Quality at the following address:
r °�avoc�
Department of 1✓mVit-diii Tent and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
A---4 t-
Please also remember to submit a copy- of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in
vour files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
ANV C -- December 5.2000 5

Lagoon 1 - Prima
Number of Animals
2500�
Type of Animals
Farrow - Wean
Surface Area (inside top dike)
144324 sq ft
Temporary Storage Period
90 days
top elevation
48.6 ft
bottom elevation
139.8 €t
bottom area
121716 sq ft
depth
8.8 ft
Structural Freeboard
Treatment Depth
Required Treatment Volume
1725275 cu ft
Treatment Volume Available
1990371 cu ft
Temporary Storage Requirements
25 yr124 hr storm
[^
8-iriches
Volume. required
Transfer to Lagoon 3
Excess Rainfall
6.6 inches_
Volume required
Transfer to Lagoon 3 �_
(Waste + Wash Water
,Transfer
to Lagoon 3

Lagoon 2 - Will Not Be Used
Surface Area (inside top dike)
169429 sq ft
Temporary Storage Period
190 days
top elevation
142.6 ft
bottom elevation
;
33 ft
155169 sq ft
bottom area
depth
19.6 ft
Structural Freeboard
_
1`foot�
Temporary Storage Requirements
25 yr/24 hr storm
8 inches
Volume required
46306 cu ft
Excess Rainfall
6.6 inches —
Volume required
25/24 Freeboard Requirement
10.7 feet_
Total Temporary Storage Requirement)
138202 cu ft
Temporary Storage Available
86308 cu ft
Total Freeboard Requirement
(
1.7 ft 1 i
Stop Pump Elevation
`
40:2 ft
Start Pump Elevation
40.9 ft
Additional Volume Above Seasonal High
WT
1259938
cu ft
7-

Lagoon 3 - 25 r/24 hr Storm and Tem ora
Storage
I
Surface Area (inside top dike)
1100660 sq it
Temporary Storage Period
190 days
top elevation
143.9 it
bottom elevation
133.5 it
bottom area
_
82092 sq it
depth 1
10.4 it
Structural Freeboard
1 foot
Temporary Storage Requirements
25 yr/24 hr storm
1
_
8 inches
Volume required
67106 cu ft
Excess Rainfall
16.6 inches
Volume required
155363 cu it
Additional Storage Requirements
25yr/24hr from Lagoon 1
96216 cu it
25yr/24hr from Lagoon 4
22140 cu it
Total 25yr/24 hr required
185462 cu ft
Excess Rain from Lagoon 1
79378 cu it
Excess Rain from Lagoon 4 118265
cu it
Total Excess Rainfall 1
153006 cu it
Waste + Wash from 3000 Sows 1260010
_
cu ft
25/24 Freeboard
Requirement
1.9 feet
25/24 Storage Available
185843 cu it
Excess Rainfall Storage Available
153006 cu it
Waste + Wash Storage Available
1
1260922 cu it
Total Temporary Storage Requirement
413016 cu it
Tempora Storage Available
1413928 cu it
2:9 feet j
Total Freeboard Requirement
Stop Pump Elevation
36.5 it
Start Pump Elevation
_
41.0 it
Additional Volume Below Seasonal
High WT
248568 cu it

Lagoon 4 - Primary
Number of Animals
500
Type of Animals
Farrow - Wean
Surface Area (inside top dike)
33210 sq ft
Temporary Storage Period
190 days
top elevation
45.5 ft
bottom elevation
37.2 ft
bottom area
20213 sq ft
depth 1
8.3 ft
Structural Freeboard
1.3 feet
Treatment Depth
7.0 ft
Required Treatment Volume
145055 cu ft
Treatment Volume Available
193112 cu ft Y
Temporary Storage Requirements
25 yr/24 hr storm
8 inches
Volume required
Transfer to Lagoon 3
Excess Rainfall
6.6 inches
Volume required
Transfer to Lagoon 3
Waste + Wash Water
Transfer to Lagoon 3

%Adam 1i 2
�tw or
ae1M 1Q sr
.4w
+r
or
aaaa for Or zrK
lAGMN 3
.42M
1
-
ri maimft. f
ar Forsw-AT111 Pal '.•_ . _ . _ .. .
1t7w1 rye
rtw . 4OX44M. fa yn� 1H
1T=4++t
LOww 1
t sam tip
NGTnm
M•
w
• rs[[ tot
ap�>Auu,r
won
�'nnn�
f1`+l
RKr. lac
L7
LAGO'C 4 1
Average inside tap ele,. = 40.62 ft.
Inside tap area a 144.324 sq, ft.
Average bottom efev. - :M91 ft.
94tton area - 12i.716 sq. Ft.
LAGOON 2
Average inside top efev. - 42.56 ft.
Inside top area c 69,459 sq. ft.
Average botton elev. = 33.01 ft.
Bottom area a 55,169 sq, ft.
LAGOON 3
Average inside top Oev, a 43.86 ft.
Inside top area a 100.660 sq; ft.
Average bottom efev. = 33.53 Ft
Bottom or" - W,092 sq. ft_
LAG13ON 4
Average inside top elev, a 45.SI Ft.
Inside top area - 33.210 s% Ft.
Average botton elev. a 3739 ft.'�
Bottom orea - 20213 sq. fl
*** Notes***
Previous Survey By DSWC Used for Lagoon Elevations
ADVANCED GfNMCS
NEU13OFF SNiNE FARM
ONyLOW COUNTY, N.C.
am3MiM of sea. AM VAT= WRASUVAPaM
r
Irs�tS�hi'/ �
wcwr frzz�x n.

Sludge Removal from Lagoon 4 of AG Farm Located in Onslow County.
Note - Sludge was moved from lagoon 1 to lagoon 4 during this process to recharge lagoon 4
Sludge level in the lagoon averages approximately 5 feet per survey conducted 10/7/2003
Total liquid level in the lagoon is approximately 6.5 feet
Sludge analysis for N taken on 9/4/2003
Analysis shows 1.7 Ibs/1000 gal on N
Analysis shows 60.8 lbs/1000 gal on P
The analysis is atypical of results for sludge.
The N value is lower than expected, however the P value is higher than expected
A new sample was taken on 10/7/2003.
The plan will be written for a minimum sludge analysis of 6 Ibs/1000
Lagoon Volumes
Bottom area (sq ft) 23262
Top area 33210
Total depth (ft) 8
Total volume at 6.5 depth 203740.88
Total Sludge volume (cu ft) 147397.5
Total Liquid volume (cu ft) 56343.375
Note this is not a closure so likely one toot or more to be left in lagoon bottom.
Total lbs of N to be applied based on one foot of material left in bottom of lagoon
Total N lbs
Use Sludge analysis of 6.0 IbsN/1000 5571.20124
Use Liquid analysis of 1.0 lbs N/1000 421.448445
Total N to be applied 5992.64969
Total acres available for application 81
Lbs of N per acre 73.9833294
Crop to be planted wheat
Rye for crop 55 bu
PAN for crop 130 lb N/ac
PAN Deficit per acre 56 lb/acre
Waste Application Depth in Inches 0.6
Note Target Application Depth of 0.6 inches of waste.
This will achieve approximately 75 lbs of N per acre.
This application Depth will remove all material execpt one foot from the lagoon.
This total volume of material applied is estimated to be approximately 1,350,000 gallons
This plan is valid for the application period of October and November of 2003.
The farm to receive the waste is located on Tract 801 in Onlsow County.
Technical Specialist Signature''-�`��
U00
gGEp

Wettable Acres Determination Certification
Namof Facility: Ne-,L • 4 F�-w s /�G
e Facility Number: 6 -7 -
Owner(s) Name: Nek Fh".% Phone No: -
Mailing Address: �
By signing, this form, the facility owner and Technical Specialist acImowledge the completion of the
Wettable Acres Determination. All necessary Wettable Acre Determination Feld Data Sheets and
calculations were completed to conduct a Wettable Acre Determination. The facility's Waste
Utilization Plan has been amended as necessary to reflect actual wetted acreage. A co y of all
worksheets, calculations, and other Wettable Acres Determination documents, along with the
applicable Waste Utilization Plan and Wettable Acre Determination Certification will be filed with
the local Soil and Water Conservation District,. A copy will also be keipt on site with the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan. Any future modifications mus a approved by a technical
specialist and filed with the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. if any
modifications to the existing irrigation system or any new irrigation equipment was required to
adequately address the waste management needs of this facility, an Irrigation Specialist or
Professional Engineer has certified the design and installation below.
Technical Specialist Name:
-Technical Specialist Signature: ..Date:-.
Tf assisted by an irrigation Specialist or Professional Engineer please read and sign below:
Animal waste application equipment has been designed or modified to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan and according to NRCS Standards. Animal waste
application equipment has been installed according to NRC�,`'� is ready for use.
Irrigation SpecialistlPE Name:, . _ V t l r.
Irrigation Specialist/PE Signature:
s-
Submit this form to.o''!�;;;
Dillllli�b
Attn: Brut Vo;A "eck
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
'�ls7-o
VYADC — 7/99

North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources 4
Division of Soil and Water Conservation 10*A
Ad IL
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary NCDENR
David S Vogel, Director NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOkJRCE5
Date: March 10, 2004
Subject: Permit Request
Neuhoff Farm AG
Facility Number 67-1
To: Paul Sherman
Non -Discharge Permit Unit
RECEIVED
WATER QUAL" SECTION
MAR 15 2004
NO"ISCHARGE PERMf ING
The Neuhoff Farm (AG) according to the owner and the records that I have
searched has never received a formal Non -Discharge permit by the Division of Water
Quality. However, it has been in the permitting process for quite some time now. It is
my.understanding that the farm is close to being permitted at this time. The final hurdle
seems to be the removal of sludge from the farm. This has been accomplished. This
farm has been inspected by both the Division of Water Quality and the Division of Soil
and Water Conservation since the inception of the inspection program. The farm was
certified by Ralph Sam Jarvis in December of 1997 in accordance with the appropriate
procedures.
This farm was originally built in the 1960 era. Thus, the farm has been and
should be treated as an existing facility. There are four lagoons on this farm that were
created over a period of time prior to 1990. The lagoons on this farm are not sufficient
to accommodate 180 days of storage however three of the lagoons are capable of
accommodating a 90 day storage period. This is accomplished by having two lagoons
act as the treatment cells, while the third lagoon is used to store all of the temporary
storage requirements. The elevation and depth of the fourth lagoon on this farm
renders it useless to be used for treatment or storage. Thus, three of the lagoons will
be used as treatment and storage while the fourth lagoon will be isolated from receiving
additional waste, however the excess rainfall and storm storage volumes for this lagoon
has been calculated as parts of the overall waste management plan to ensure that this
lagoon will not cause a discharge.
I have recertified the storage capacities of the lagoons as well as created a new
waste management plan for the facility based on actual irrigated acreage. The facility
required the use of a honey wagon to meet the required PAN balances. However, I
have provided an irrigation plan for this farm which includes an additional six acres that
will be put under a solid set irrigation system. The additional acreage will now allow the
943 Washington Square Mail, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

farm to operate without the use of a honey wagon. The new solid set irrigation has not
been installed at this time however, it will be installed within thirty days from the date of
this letter. I required sludge to be removed from the facility prior to certifying the
storage capacities in the lagoons.
I have enclosed the new certification forms and the new waste management plan
as well as a copy of the sludge removal plan for your review. The sludge has already
been removed from the facility. If you could expedite the permit review for this farm that
would be of great help to the owners because they are concerned about their status.
Thank you very much for your help in this matter. Please include this letter as
part of the permit review package as it is helpful in explaining to the reviewer how this
farm will function. If you have further questions or comments I may be reached at 252-
946-6481.
Sincerely,
William Carl Dunn, PE
Environmental Engineer
Cc: DSWC WaRO
t�tttt4Ei0E1#gj't'1+'
4 =
lip
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Irrigated Acreage Determination Procedures
for Wastewater Application Equipment
Hard Hose Traveling. Gun System
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET*
1. Make and -model number C.IvAq ^ '3000
2. Hose length 10 -15 [feet] and hose inside diameter (ID) 3 [inch]
3. -Gun make and model number 1 SO
4. Gun nozzle size I.0 [inch], X ring orifice, taper bore orifice
S. Gun arc angle 19 0 [degrees]
6. Travel lane spacing 40-220 [feet]. Indicate whether uniform or X random.
Number of exterior hydrants 13 Number of interior hydrants �-
7. Gun wetted diameter 2 90 [feet]. X_ measured or based on gun chart.
8. Gun pressure 53 [psi] observed at working gauge,
X determined from gun charts, calculated (show calculations)
**9. Operating pressure at hose reel 85 [psi]. observed at working gauge or
_ X provided by owner.
**15
Supply line size 6 [inch] (from pump to last hydrant)
Supply line length 4 5 00 feet (maximum pumping distance)
Supply line type ��_ PVC or aluminum
Pump make and model number
Pump capacity [gpm]
Engine make and model number
or
**16. Electric motor horsepower and rpm [hp] .[rpm]
Note: It is strongly recommended that you field determine wetted diameter and operating
pressure at the reel and gun.
* Locate each hydrant on a copy.of the map. Indicate the start and stop of the sprinkler cart
for each travel.lane and show the distance traveled. Show the location of the supply line.
Irrigated acres are determined by the travel lane.
** Optional data, furnish where possible.
*** Information furnished by
Signature of owner or faciffty representative
Printed name of owner or facility representative
Date
a
j n
andlor �ju�r— �°�
Signature of technical specialist
Printed name of.technical specialist''
10-2$-o I-
*— only the person or pe6pie collecting the data should sign the Field Data Worksheet.

(Multiple worksheets may be needed)
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
1. Farm number (identification) f°'�' 1 Field number (identification) P111 1 - 2.
2. Irrigation system designation _X_ Existing irrigation system — New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes. 1 # Exterior lanes 11*5 feet) Length of pull(Ll)
# Interior lanes I # Exterior lanes S45 [feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter 290 [feet] from Feld Data Worksheet
S. Spacing 200 Hydrant spacing [feet] "70 [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout X Multiple hydrants r Single Hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L, Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant)
69 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table El: 70 Column 13
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll)
(Pull length`s&5 [feet] X Wetted width230 [feet]) / 43,560
0 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
3.15 Total acres for travel Lane length (L1) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (LZ,) Interior or X Exterior (iane/hydrant)
. 69 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table F9 70 Column Q
2.8 $ (b) Acres middle portion of pull (1,2)
{Pull length S4i [feet] X Wetted width 230 [feet]} / 43,560
O (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
3.5 7 Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L) Interior or ____Exterior (lane hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3)
(Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]] 143,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
3.15 (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X 1 # Lanes 3 I S Acres
3 • �' (b) Acres per travel lane length (1,2) X I # Lanes = 1 • 5 7 Acres
(c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres
Z•'72 Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: 0'( r�—.M-•-r� Date: 3'8' 04
Signature of technical specialist
(75)

(Multiple worksheets maybe needed)
HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm number (identification) G'Z -� Field number (identification) X 11 3 - 5
2. Irrigation system designation X Existing irrigation system _ New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes . I # Exterior lanes. `i75 feet] Length of puli(Ll)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes 3 1L 0 [feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior lanes I # Exterior lanes 405 [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter 2-90 [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing 12 O Hydrant spacing [feet] -75 [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants t Single hydrant ____• Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (Q) Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant)
10 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E; 7S Column $
2.62 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1)
[Pull length. + 15 [feet] X Wetted width240 [feet]} / 43,560
U (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
3.32 Total acres for travel lane length (L1) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length QYX) X Interior or Exterior Cane/hydrant)
5 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E I 5 Colurnn _ T
63 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2)
(Pull length S2 D [feet] X Wetted width 22 D [feet]) / 43,560
J (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
3.2,? Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length Q) Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant)
70 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table GE 75 Column $
2.14 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (1.3)
[Pull. length.LOS [feet] X Wetted width'24 0 [feet]} / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
19 `i Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
3.32 (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X # Lanes = 3•'3'1 Acres
3.2g (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X I # Lanes = 3.2 Y Acres
2.99 (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X I # Lanes = 2.9 4 Acres
qS 4 Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: /Z< ' e::!P Date: 3f - 0'�
Signature of technical specialist
i

(Multiple worksheets may be needed) HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System RECEIVED
W MS QUALIV SECT14N
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET MAR -I
� 2004•
1. Farm number (identification) Feld number (identification) A4 i 6 - �[ A4tG1~F1+RM1�flNG
2. Irrigation system designation X Existing irrigation system _ New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes. # Exterior lanes 410 feet] Length of pull(Ll).
# Interior lanes I # Exterior lanes . So5 [feet] Length of pull(LZ)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter 210 [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing 19 0 Hydrant spacing [feet] 60 [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout X Multiple hydrants ='� Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (I[.],) Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) B • & S (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Er'6 0 Column
2•07 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll)
(Pull length_` O [feet] X Wetted width Z2a [feet]) / 43,560
0 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
2•13 Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (Q) Interior or x Exterior (lane/hydrant)
0 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table kcr60 Column 13
�• 56 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2)
(Pull length SOS [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
3.21 Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, j Interior or TExterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (1.3)
(Pull length [feet] X Wetted width. [feet]] / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
2.13 (a) Acres per travel lane length (LI) X # Lanes = 2.13 Acres
1.11 (b) Acres per travel lane length (LZ) X 1 # Lanes = 3 • I Acres
(c) Acres per travel lane length (I,3) X # Lanes = Acres
5 .674 Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: R&OO, OA-1 Date:Lg •)1
_Signature of technical specialist

(Multiple worksheets may be needed)
HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm number (identification) 6.�' I Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system :.
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes. i # Exterior lanes Igo feet] Length of pull(LI)
I # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes '1TV [feet] Length of pull(LZ)
# Interior lanes I # Exterior lanes 7,75 [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter 2 ft [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing 120 Hydrant spacing [feet] G O [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout X Multiple hydrants Single hydrant ^ Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L, interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant)
. 6 S (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Fr 6 0 Column
2-41F (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll)
[Pull length`lqJ [feet] X Wetted width220 [feet](/ 43,560
D (c) Acres stop end of pull from -Table Column
3 • I'3 Total acres for travel lane Iength (LI) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length x Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
. S 4 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table f 160 Column 13
2.05 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2)
(Pull length`fgs [feet] X Wetted width ISO [feet](/ 43,560
f-7 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
3 -" Total acres for travel lane length (1,2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L_; Interior or x Exterior (lane hydrant)'
6 s (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Et GO Column Q
I• `�'s (b) Acres middle portion of pull (1,3)
{Pull length .95 [feet] X Wetted width 22.o [feet]) / 43,560
D (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
2.6 0 Total acres for travel lane length (1.3) (Sums: a + b + c)
Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
3. 1 3 (a) Acres per travel lane length (11) X I # Lanes = 3: 13 Acres
2.59 (b) Acres per travel lane length (I.2) X I # Lanes = 2 Sy Acres
2.60 (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X _ I # Lanes = 2 b 0 Acres
$. 3 2 Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: &u'et' (:I- ��"^�- Date:1 ? 94
Signature of technical speciai€st

(Multiple worksheets may be needed)
i.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL "WORKSHEET
Farm number (identification) 071 I Field number (identification) Pu 11 11
Irrigation system designation --2L Existing irrigation system _ New/expanded irrigation system
Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes" 1 # Exterior lanes 9S feet] Length of pull(L1)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2)
## Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(B)
Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
Spacing Si.^.51e. Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage"of wetted diameter]
Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants ---L Single Hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants
Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
6 t (a) Acres start end of pull from Table P90 +' Column -�
S• 3� (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll)
(Pull length FIS [feet] X Wetted width GO [feet]} / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
S-c19 Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L_) Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2)
(Pull length - [feet] X Wetted width [feet]} / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (1.2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L,) Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3)
(Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]( / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
5 � (a) Acres per travel lane length (Li) X 1 # Lanes = S q 9 Acres
(b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X # Lanes = Acres
(c) Acres per travel lane length (1.3) X # Lanes = Acres
S 1r'? Total CAWM ? wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: - '14 6f tr' Date: }- g "a It
Signature of technlcal specialist
t

(Multiple worksheets maybe needed) HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. -Farm number (identification) Field number (identification) �� 1 l ' 13
2. • Irrigation system designation X Existing irrigation system - New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior- lanes ._ I _ # Exterior lanes •' 90 feet] Length of pull(Ll)
# Interior lanes I # Exterior lanes 3sf'S [feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter �e90 [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing 1 If Hydrant spacing [feet] G 0 [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout X Multiple hydrants ? Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for, the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L, Interior or X Exterior (Lane/hydrant)
.45 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table FF60 Column 3
• `i 2 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1)
(Pull length2fa [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560
'(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
2.0 7 Total acres for travel lane Iength (LI) (Suin: a + b + c)
Travel lane length UI) Interior or _.X__Exterior (iane/hydrant) _
b 5 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Fr 60 Column B
15 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2)
. (Pull length 38S (feet] X Wetted width 12Ll [feet]} / 43,560
3 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Z • L 0 Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, Interior or _Exterior (Iane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (1-3)
(Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]} / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field, Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
1•0 -1 (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X 1 # Lanes = 2 07 Acres
2.40 (b) Acres per travel lane length (LZ) X I # Lanes = '- 6 O Acres
(c) Acres per travel lane length (I.3) X # Lanes = Acres
tF (e 7 Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: ��`^~' Date: 3-8-01
Signature of technical specialist

(Multiple worksheets may be needed) HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRR[GATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm numbei (identification) 611 `[ Field number (identification) P`+i l I+f
2. Irrigation system designation . X Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes . [ # Exterior lanes b i S feet] Length of pull(Ll)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter 2cfD [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing",4e _ Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants J:— Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (IJ Interior or Exterior (lane/hydiant)
(,1 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table F90} Column_
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (1,1)
{Pull lengthG+5 [feet] X Wetted width 2G0 [feet]) / 43,560
a (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
4-'11 Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (Ij Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2)
[Pull length _ [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lame length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3)
[Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (13) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
(a) Acres per travel lane length (Li) X --J_# Lanes = Ll : q Acres
(b) Acres per travel lane length (L2,) X #Lanes = Acres
(c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X #Lanes = Acres
t- Total CAViW wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: A—.Y - eL � � Date:3'
Signature of technical specialist
ti

(MuifrpM worksheets may be needed) HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm number (identification) G?- r Field number (identification) P-411 157 , .
Z. -irrigation system designation � Existing irrigation system _ New/expanded irrigation system. .
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes. I ' # Exterior lanes 39S feet] Length of pull(Ll)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2)
## Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter 21)0 [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. • Spacing S c Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout _ Multiple hydrants •( Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based an pattern, spacing, 'and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
G I (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E90 } Column g
Z • 7 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (1,1)
(Pull length39 S [feet] X Wetted width 260 [feet]) / 43,560
J (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
2 g S Total acres for travel Iane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L-) Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (1,2)
(Pull length_ [feet] X Wetted width [feet]} / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acmes for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (B)
(Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (13) (Sum: a + b. + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
2 •`# S (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X k # Lanes = 2•1 S Acres
(b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X _# Lanes = Acres
(c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # lanes Acres
Z• Qi Total CAMW wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: 4-)A` 0-0 Date:
Signature of technical specialist

Irrigated Aaeage Determination Procedures
for Wastewater Application Equipment
STATIONARY SPRINKLER /GUN SYSTEM
WETTABLE ACRE COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
f. Farm number (identification) b^ ' Field number (identification) Zonc
2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system
x _ New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of stationary sprinklers # Interior sprinklers 4 # Exterior sprinklers
4. Wetted diameter 1 G 5 [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing .100 Sprinkler spacing along lateral [feet]
60 Sprinkler spacing as a percentage of wetted diameter
6. Sprinkler pattern Multiple laterals _- Single lateral
Excessively spaced sprinklers
7. Read the irrigated area per sprinkler for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and
column based on pattern, spacing, and sprinkler location.
Acres per interior sprinkler from Table Column
•Z 0 Acres per exterior sprinkler from Table 3 Column G
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per sprinkler by the number of sprinklers of each
category in the field. Add all of these. The sum is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
• 2G (a) Acres per � }imerier sprinkler X # Sprinklers = Acres
(b) Acres per exterior sprinkler X Sprinklers Acres
l • 0`i 'Total wettable acres for field (Semi: 8a + 8b)
Wettable Acre Computational Woziaheet completed by:
Signature of technical specialist
(16
Date: I' 1' a y

irrigated Acreage Determination Procedures
for Wastewater Application Equipment
STATIONARY SPRINKLER /GUN SYSTEM
WETTABLE ACRE COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
i. Farm number (identification) G 1— i Field number (identification) Z o^c 2-
2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system
X New/expanded irrigation system
F
3. Number of stationary sprinklers # Interior sprinklers 4 # Exterior sprinklers
4. Wetted diameter 165 [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing [ 0 0 Sprinkler spacing along lateral [feet]
60 Sprinkler spacing as a percentage of wetted diameter
6. Sprinkler patter Multiple laterals X Single lateral
Excessively spaced sprinklers
7. Read the irrigated area per sprinkler for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and
column based on pattern, spacing, and sprinkler location.
Acres per interior sprinkler from Table Column
•Zb Acres per exterior sprinkler from Table 3 Column G
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per sprinkler by the number of sprinklers of each
category in the field. Add all of these_ The sum is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
(a) Acres per interior. sprinkler X # Sprinklers = Acres
2 G (b) Acres per exterior sprinkler X �_ # Sprinklers = 1.0 4 Acres
• 04 "Total wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet completed by: � � lam.
} Signature of technical specialist
16
Date: 3-3'0`1

Irrigated Acreage Determination Procedures
for Wastewater Application Equipment
STATIONARY SPRINKLER /GUN SYSTEM
WETTABLE ACRE COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
I. Farm number (identification) % 7 - I Field number (identification) 24. e 3 - (0
2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system
X New/expanded irrigation system
N
3. Number of stationary sprinklers # Interior sprinklers 5 # Exterior sprinllers
4. Wetted diameter
b&S [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing 100 Sprinkler spacing along lateral [feet]
G 0 Sprinkler spacing as a percentage of wetted diameter
b. Sprinkler pattern Multiple laterals Single lateral
: a
Excessively spaced sprinklers
7. Read the irrigated area per sprinkler for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and
column based on pattern, spacing, and sprinkler location_
5 Acres per interior sprinkler from Table 3 Column
Z43 Acres per exterior sprinkler from Table 3 Column E
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per sprinkler by the number of sprinklers of each
category in the field. Add all of these. The sum is the total irrigated' acreage for the field.
22 S (a) Acres per interior sprinkler X 1 # Sprinklers = S Acres
(b) Acres per exterior sprinkler X LS # Sprinklers = 3.645 Acres
3 • V 7 'Total wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b)
Wettable Acre Computational Worlsheet completed by: t-*j` �'"°�- Date: 3' g "7L+
Signature of technical specialist
(T6

Hbtd,,
IR
'non,
mat
Pa
. . . . . . . . . . . .
06
v,
�Y;
J
-65
BODY275
&
J :
V.
0
8; 8
�g
114-.�Z 4 S.
31&� N
NIVIRDE 130WK�
ZU
;
g l
X
-
M
X�
0
.
'-,
-
-ZbA
I MO
'43R
VWDE @PP)U
tSDX
75
'IS 2ORN
330,M V
9A-
-,1W
R
>
, �
W,-,
See your irrigation representatilve about Cadman's complete line of irrigation products.
Power Units Caprad Water Pumps Alumhwm Pipe and ROW PVC Pipe and Fittings Manure Pumps
Cadman Power Equipment Limited, whose policy Is one of continuous irnpravemeM
reserves the right to change specIllications, design or prices wIftut Inmrring
obi lgatkyn.
Cadman Power Equipments 50 years of leadership and
experience in design and manufacturing stands behind every
Cadman Traveller produced.

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Neuhoff Farms AG
Neuhoff Farms
Richlands, NC
910-324-4804
03-12-2004
This plan has been developed by:
Carl Dunn
DSWC WaRO
943 Washington Sq Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
ell
Developer Signature
Type of PIan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S.- Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
q'���tttlsilldl�f��f
G.jIIG9Ca- `�y�1 i+
dd t
Plan Approved By: - -- - -ZV d � _ = .., 3-12 - o `t
0
TechniEl Sjciali6S( pture q Date
Q24 . 31 J
���l711111t�tt
------------------------------------------------------------•
162120 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 03-12-2004 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S9
Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Liquid waste generated 9,609,000
gals/year by a 3,000 animal Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Liquid
operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of
approximately 90 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
14828
Incorporated
25466
Injected
28045
Irrigated
16118
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
16,711
12,173,422
-2,564,422
------------------------ ------------------------------ ---- ----------------------------------------------------- -------------------
Note: In source 1D, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
162120 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 03-12-2004 Source Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic
Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown,
where avai lab le.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1796
12
2.07
2.07
N/A
Autryville
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-117 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
1796
13
2.61
2.61
NIA
Autryville
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay4n Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bernnudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
1796
14
4.29
4.29
N/A
Autryville
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
1796
15
2.981
2.98
N/A
Autryville
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay4n Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
1796
Zone 3
0,97
0.97
N/A
Autryville
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4n Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
1796
Zone 4
0.95
0.95
N/A
Autryville
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
1796
Zone 5
0.97
0.97
NIA
Autryville
Cereal/Annual Rye US, Hay4n Harvest
2.0 Torts
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
1796
Zone 6
0.97
0.97
NIA
Autryvilie
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Fl3y4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3197
1
3.151
3.15
N/A
Foreston
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
3197
1 10
2.61
161
N/A
Foreston
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3197
11
5.99
5.99
NIA
Foreston
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
3197
2
3.571
3.57
NIA
Foreston
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
3197
3
3.32
3.32
N/A
Foreston
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
3197
4
3.28
3.28
N/A
lForeston
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
3197
5
2.94
2.94
N/A
Foreston
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
3197
6
2.731
2.73
N/A
Foreston
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3197
7
3.21
NIA
Foreston
Cereal/Annual Rye US, Hay417 Harvest
2.0 Tons
E921
Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3197
8
3.13
. 3.13
N/A
Foreston
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3197
9
2.59
2.59
NIA
lForeston
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay4n Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3197
Zone 1
1 1.041
1.04
NIA
Foreston
Fescue Hay
4"0 Tons
162120 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed 3/12I2004
PCs Page I of 2

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
3197
Zone 2
1.04
1.04
NIA
Foreston
CereaUAnnual Rye US, Hay-4n Harvest
2.0 Tons
Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: '54.41 54.41
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2'&
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
c 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the root
zo ne.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
improve the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency
> 10
should be considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based
Rotations (3 28), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter
Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
162120 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed 3/12/2004
PCS Page 2 of 2
ArnTC. C.....l...l * .....................».. --A .E....,

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation: This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that wilI be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
10
Soil Series
Total
Acres
um
Acres
Crop
RYE
APplic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Rcq'd
(lbs/A)
COMM.
Pert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applie.
Method.
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
ManumA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1796
12
S9
Autryville
2.07
2.07
Cereal/Annual Rye OIS, I lay-4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
1011-3/31
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
0.00
123.41
0.00
1796
12
S9
Autryville
2.07
2.07
Bermudagrass Flay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*275
0
0
Irrig.
275
163.95
0.00
339.38
4.00
1796
13
S9
Autryville
2.61
2.61
Cereal/Annual Rye OIS, Hay-4n harvest
2.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
0.00
155.601
0.00
1796
13
S9
Autryville
2.61
2.61
Berntudagrass I -lay
5.5 Tons
311-9/30
*275
0
0
Irrig.
275
163.95
0.00
427.91
0.00
1796
14
S9
Autryville
4.29
4.29
Cereal/Annual Rye 01S, Hay-4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
0.00
255.76
0.00
1796
14
S9
Autryville
4.29
4.29
Bermudagrass Flay
5.5 Tons
-3/1-9/30
*275
0
0
Irrig,
275
163.95
0.00
703.34
0.00
1796
15
S9
Autryville
2.98
2.98
Cereal/Annuat Rye O/S, Hay4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
0.00
177.66
0.00
1796
15
S9
Autryville
2.98
2.98
$ermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*275
0
0
Irrig.
275
163.95
0.00
488.57
0.00
1796
Zone 3
S9
Autryville
0.97
0.97
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Tlay4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
1011-3/31
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
0.00
57.83
0.00
1796
Zone 3
S9
Autryville
0.97
0.97
Bermudagmss Hay
5.5 Tans
3/1-9/30
*275
0
0
Irrig.
275
163.951
0.00
159.03
0.00
1796
Zone 4
S9
Autryville
0.95
0.95
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay4n Ilarvesl
2.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
100
0
0
brig.
100
59.62
0.00
56.64
0.00
1796
Zone 4
S9
Autryville
0.95
0.95
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*275
0
0
Irrig.
275
163.95
0.00
155.75
0.00
1796
Zone 5
S9
Autryville
0.97
0.97
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay4n Ilarvest
2.0 Tons
I0/1-3/31
t00
0
0
brig.
100
59.62
0.00
57.83
0.00
1796
Zone 5
S9
Autryville
0.97
0.97
Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*275
0
0
Irrig.
275
163.95
0.00
159.03
0.00
1796
Zone 6
S9
Autryville
0.971
0.97
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay4n Harvest
2.0 Tons
1011-3/31
]00
0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
0.00
57.83
0.00
1796
Zone 6
S9
Autryville--T
0.97
0.97
Bermudagrass Hay
=5TIII
3/1-9/30
*275
0
0
Irrig.
275
163.95
0.00
159.03
0.00
162120 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 3/12/2004
AIUT Page 1 of 3

Waste iltili7atinn Table
Year t
Tract
Field
Source
ID
I Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res,
(lbs/A)
I
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Feld)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tans
1000 gals
tons
3197
1
S9
Foreston
3.15
3.15
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
*200
0
0
Irrig.
200
119.24
0.00
375,59
0.00
3197
t0
S9
Foreston
2,61
2,61
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, I lay-4/7 Ilarvest
2,0'1'ons
10/1-3/31
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
0.00
155.60
0.00
3197
10
S9
Foreston
2.61
2.61
Berrnudagrass flay
6,01'ons
311-9/30
*300
0
0
brig.
300
178.85
0.00
466.81
0.00
3197
11
S9
Foreston
5.99
5.99
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
8/1-7131
*200
0
0
Irrig.
200
119.24
0,001
714.22
0.00
3197
2
S9
Foreston
3.57
3.57
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
*200
0
0
Irrig.
200
=
0.00
1 425.67
0.00
3197
3
S9
Foreston
3.32
3.32
Fescue Hay
4.0'1'ons
8/1-7/31
*200
0
0
Irrig.
200
119.24
0.00
395.86
0.00
3197
4
S9
Foreston
3.28
3,2$
Fescue l lay
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
*200
0
0
Irrig.
200
119,24
0.00
391.10
0.00
3197
5
S9
Foreston
2.94
2.94
Fescue flay
4.0'1'ons
8/1-7131
*200
0
0
]Trig.
200
119,24
0.00
350.56
0.00
3197
6
S9
Foreston
2,73
2,73
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
1011-3/31
100
0
0
brig.
100
59.62
0.00
162.76
0.00
3197
6
S9
Foreston
2.73
2.73
Qermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tans
311-9/30
*300
0
0
brig.
300
178.85
0.00
488.271
0.00
3197
7
S9
Foreston
3.21
3.21
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4/7 Ifarvest
2.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
100
0
0
brig.
100
59.62
0.00
191.37
0.00
3197
7
S9
Foreston
3.21
3.21
Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
311-9130
*300
0
0
Irrig.
300
178.85
0.00
574.12
0.00
3197
8
S9
Foreston
3.13
3.13
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay4/7 Harvest
2,0 Tons
1011-3131
100
0
0
Irrig,
100
59.62
0.00
186.60
0.0
3197
8
S9
Foreston
3.13
3.13
Bermudagrass Flay
6,0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*300
0
0
Irrig.
300
178.85
0.00
559.81
0.00
3197
9
89
Foreston
2.59
2.59
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay4n Harvest
2.0 Tons
1011-3/31
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
0.00
154.41
0.00
3197
9
S9
Foreston
2.59
2.59
Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
*300
0
0
Irrig.
300
178.85
0.00
463,23
0.00
3197
Zone 1
S9
Foreskin
1.04
1.04
fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
*200
0
0
Irrig.
200
119.24
0.00
124.01
0.00
3197
Zone 2
S9
Foreston
1.04
1.04
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
1011-3/31
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
59.62
0,00
62.00
0.00
3[97
Znne 2
S9
Foreston
1.04
1.04
Qcrmudagrass Hay
6.0'rons
311-9/30
*300
0
0
brig.
300
17$.85
0'00
186.0I
0.00
162120 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 3/12/2004 WUT Page 2 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Ta1al
Acres
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Reqd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res,
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrienl
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
9,962.63
�.
9,609.00
1 .
-353.63
i3
0,00
¢, r
0.0
000
Notes: 1. In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, awned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
162120 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 3/12/2004 WUT Page 3 of 3

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies
with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in
runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to
receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one application
event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field.
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
1796
12
Autryville
0.60
1.0
1796
13
Auftyville
0.60
1.0
1796
14
Autryville
0.60
1.0
1796
15
Autryville
0.60
1.0
1796
Zone 3
utryville
0.60
1.0
1790
Zone 4
Autryville
0.60
1.0
1796
Zone 5
Autryville
0.60
1.0
1796
Zone 6
Autryville
0.60
1.0
3197
1
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
10
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
11
Foreston,
0.50
1.0
3197
2
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
3
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
4'
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
5
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
6
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
7
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
8
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
9
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
Zone 1
Foreston
0.50
1.0
3197
Zone 2
lForeston
0.50
1.0
162120 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed 3/12/2004 LAX Page 1 of 1

The following. Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic.matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
88.89
177.79
266.68
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
44.45
88-89
133.34
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
83.34
166.68
250.02
--------------- ........---------- ----------------- • ------------------------ ..
162120 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 03-12-2004 Sludge Page 1 of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and, is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure.. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste St ra e Ca acity
Source Name
Swine Farrowing-Weanlina Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity Days)
Start Date
01/01
90
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
-203
1
2
-197
1
3
-155
1
4
-135
1
5
-116
I
6
-96
1
7
-88
1
8
-80
1
9
.73
1
10
-70
l
li
-66
1
12
-86
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ....... ----------------------
162120 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 03-12-2004 Capacity Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. - Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than ] 0 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
------------------------------------------------------------------------.-.-..:--------------------------------------------.....--------------I---------------
162120 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 03-12-2004 Specification Page 1 of 4

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding'should occur in order to control odor and flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
--------------------------------------.------ -------------------------------------.-----------------------------------------------------------------
162120 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 03-12-2004 Specification Page. 2 of 4

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
1$. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
162120 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 03-12-2004 Specification Page 3 of 4

21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and wasteanalysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a
minimum of five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
--- ..------------------------------------------------------------- ------ ........................... ---....--..----.-... .
162120 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 03-12-2004 Specification Page 4 of 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 10, 6, 7, 8, 9, Zone 2
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Effective artificial drainage MUST be in place to achieve Realistic Yield Expectations
provided for these soils.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 Iblac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 11, 2, 3, 4, 5, Zone I
Fescue: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Moderate to Marginal.
In the Coastal Plain, tall fescue can be planted Sept. 1 to Oct. 15 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Tall fescue will tolerate soil wetness but not flooding or prolonged saturation; use
ladino clover for mixtures on these soils. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and
potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply
N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16212o Database Version 1.0; Date .Printed: 03-12-2004 Crop Note Page 1 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 10, 6, 7, 8, 9, Zone 2
Cereal/Annual Rye Overseeded — Hay
CEREAL RYE
The cereal rye should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth. The
most consistent stands are obtained from drilling rye into short (less than 3 inches tall) bermudagrass sod.
If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short Bermuda sod followed by a light
cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds should be
1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the bennuda
prior to August 31. An application of 50 lbs/acre of Plant Available N (PAN) may be applied between
September 15 and October 30. An additional 50 lbs.acre of PAN may be applied in Fcbruary-March. If
rye growth is harvested on time and does not significantly shade the Bermuda, PAN rates for the
subsequent bermuda crop are based on realistic yields of bermuda. A harvest is required prior to heading
or April 7, which ever comes first. This is necessary to minimize the potential for shading Bermuda and
reducing its yields.
ANNUAL RYEGRASS
Annual ryegrass should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth.
The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling ryegrass into short (less than 3 inches tall)
bermudagrass sod_ If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short bermuda sod followed
by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds
should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the
bermuda prior to August 31. An application of 50 lbs/acre of PAN may be applied between September
15 and October 30. An additional 50 lbs. acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If additional
PAN is applied to the ryegrass in April -May, the PAN rate for the bermuda must be reduced by a
corresponding amount. This is necessary because ryegrass growth during April -May will reduce
bermuda yields and shorten the time bermuda can fully utilize the N. A harvest is required by heading or
April 7, which ever comes first to prevent shading of emerging bermuda during April -May period. To
favor the production of the bermuda, additional harvests of ryegrass will be required when the ryegrass
canopy reaches 12 to 15 inches height.
........................... --------------------------- ------------------------------ ....... ...............-• .... ...--- --- ...............
162120 Database Version 1ff Date Printed: 03-12-2004 Crop Note Page 2 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 12, 13, 14, 15, Zone 3, Zone 4, Zone 5, zone 6
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced I' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
16212o Database Version 1.01 Date Printed: 03-12-2004 Crop Note Page 3 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 12, 13, 14, 15, Zone 3, Zone 4, Zone 5, Zone 6
Cereal/Annual Rye Overseeded — Hay
CEREAL RYE
The cereal rye should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth. The
most consistent stands are obtained from drilling rye into short (less than 3 inches tall) bermudagrass sod.
If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short bermuda sod followed by a light
cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds should be
1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda
prior to August 31. An application of 501bs/acre of Plant Available N (PAN) may be applied between
September 15 and October 30. An additional 50 lbs.acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If
rye growth is harvested on time and does not significantly shade the bermuda, PAN rates for the
subsequent bermuda crop are based on realistic yields of bermuda. A harvest is required prior to heading
or April 7, which ever comes first. This is necessary to minimize the potential for shading bermuda and
reducing its yields.
ANNUAL RYEGRASS
Annual ryegrass should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth.
The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling ryegrass into short (less than 3 inches tall)
bermudagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short bermuda sod followed
by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds
should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the
bermuda prior to August 31. An application of 50 lbs/acre of PAN may be applied between September
15 and October 30. An additional 50 lbs. acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If additional
PAN is applied to the ryegrass in April -May, the PAN rate for the bermuda must be reduced by a
corresponding amount. This is necessary because ryegrass growth during April -May will reduce
bermuda yields and shorten the time bermuda can fully utilize the N. A harvest is required by heading or
April 7, which ever comes first to prevent shading of emerging berrnuda during April -May period. To
favor the production of the bermuda, additional harvests of ryegrass will be required when the ryegrass
canopy reaches 12 to 15 inches height.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------••--- - ---
162120 Database Version 1.0� Date Printed: 03-12-2004 Crop Note Page 4 of 4

T 7-1
F i 1-,d,- Cali Wti b:n, ribic-ed dees-
;+_ �4..- _ for A eil,W6-tteWAtei -Aiirpircation,-E i e quipjr W
K 1W OSE,,A,'..
IND:
I"
-T
�;�f CABLUTOW, AVELF-Ri,
ON. Y - ; !r RUGAT-1 iiS STE
North
TZ
7F
CO(jperative
6rohna
-Se Extensi6h; Nice
arc�
-u ity -
..'Ndrth'C&o1ino State nivers

•
Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
HARD HOSE
AND CABLE
TOW TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
General Guidelines
Land application equipment used on animal production farms must be field
calibrated or evaluated in accordance with existing design charts and tables
according to state rules that went into effect September 1, 1996. Technical
Specialist certifying waste management plans after September 1, 1996, must
also certify that operators have been provided calibration and adjustment
guidance for all land application equipment. The rules apply to irrigation sys-
tems as well as all other types of liquid, slurry, or solid application equipment.
Information presented in manufacturers' charts are based on average op-
erating conditions for relatively new equipment. Discharge rates and applica-
tion rates change over time as equipment ages and components wear. As a
result, equipment should be field calibrated regularly to ensure that applica-
tion rates and uniformity are consistent with values used during the system
design and given in manufacturers' specifications. Field calibration involves
collection and measurement of the material being applied at several locations
in the application area. This publication contains step-by-step guidelines for
field calibration of hard hose and cable tow traveler irrigation systems.
Operating an irrigation system differently than
assumed in the design will alter the application rate,
uniformity of coverage, and subsequently the applica-
tion uniformity. Operating with excessive pressure
results in smaller droplets, greater potential for drift,
and accelerates wear of the sprinkler nozzle. Pump
wear tends to reduce operating pressure and flow.
With continued use, nozzle wear results in an increase
in the nozzle opening, which will increase the
discharge rate while decreasing the wetted diameter.
Clogging of nozzles or crystallization of main lines
can result in increased pump pressure but reduced
flow at the gun. Plugged intakes will reduce operating
pressure. An operating pressure below design pressure
greatly reduces the coverage diameter and application
uniformity. Field calibration helps ensure that nutri-
ents from animal waste are applied uniformly and at
proper rates.
The calibration of a hard hose or cable tow system
involves setting out collection containers, operating
the system, measuring the amount of wastewater
collected in each container, and then computing the
average application volume and application unifor-
mity.
An in -line flow meter installed in the main
irrigation line provides a good estimate of the total
volume pumped from the lagoon during each irriga-
tion cycle. The average application depth can be
determined by dividing the pumped volume by the
application area. The average application depth is
computed from the formula:
,average application depth (inches) =
Volume pumped (gallons)
27,154 (gal/ac-in) X Application area (acres)
The average application depth is the average
amount applied throughout the field. Unfortunately,
sprinklers do not apply the same depth of water
throughout their wetted diameter. Under normal
operating conditions, application depth decreases
towards the outer perimeter of the wetted diameter.
Big gun sprinkler systems typically have overlap
based on a design sprinkler spacing of 70 to 80
percent of the wetted sprinkler diameter to compen-
0

Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
sate for the declining application along the outer
perimeter. When operated at the design pressure, this
overlap results in acceptable application uniformity.
When operated improperly, well -designed systems
will not provide acceptable application uniformity.
For example, if the pressure is too low, the applica-
tion depth will be several times higher near the
center of sprinkler and water will not be thrown as
far from the sprinkler as indicated in manufacturers'
charts. Even through the average application depth
may be acceptable, some areas receive excessively t
high application while others receive no application
at all.
When applying wastewater high in nutrients, it is
important to determine the application uniformity.
Collection containers distributed throughout the
application area must be used to evaluate application
uniformity.
Many types of containers can be used to collect
flow and determine the application uniformity.
Standard rain gauges work best and are recom-
mended because they already have a graduated scale
from which to read the application depth.
Pans, plastic buckets, jars, or anything with a
uniform opening and cross section can be used
provided the container is deep enough (at least 4
inches deep) to prevent splash and excessive evapora-
tion, and the liquid collected can be easily trans-
ferred to a scaled container for measuring. All con-
tainers should be the same size and shape to simplify
application depth computations.
All collection containers should be set up at the
same height relative to the height of the sprinkler
nozzle (discharge elevation). Normally, the top of
each container should be no more than 36 inches
above the ground. Collectors should be located so
that there is no interference from the crop. The crop
canopy should be trimmed to preclude interference
or splash into the collection container.
Calibration should be performed during periods
of low evaporation. Best times are before 10 a.m. or
after 4 p.m. on days with light wind (less than 5
miles per hour). On cool, cloudy days the calibration
can be performed anytime when wind velocity is less
than 5 mph.
The volume (depth) collected during calibration
should be read soon after the sprinkler gun cart has
moved one wetted radius past the collection gauges
to minimize evaporation from the rain gauge. Where
a procedure must be performed more than once,
containers should be read and values recorded
immediately after each setup.
Calibration Setup for Hard Hose and
Cable Tow Traveling Guns
Hard hose and cable tow traveling guns are calibrated
by placing a row (transect) of collection containers or
c gauges perpendicular to the direction of travel, Figure
1. The outer gauge on each end of the row should
extend past the furthest distance the gun will throw
wastewater to ensure that the calibration is performed
on the "full" wetted diameter of the gun sprinkler.
Multiple rows increase the accuracy of the calibration.
Containers should be spaced no further apart than
1/16 of the wetted diameter of the gun sprinkler not
to exceed 25 feet. At least 16 gauges should be used in
the calibration. Sixteen gauges will be adequate
except for large guns where the wetted diameter
exceeds 400 feet.
(Maximum recommended spacing between
gauges, 25 feet X 16 = 400 feet.) Gauges should be set
at least one full wetted diameter of throw from either
end of the travel lane, as shown in Figure 1.
The system should be operated such that the
minimum travel distance of the gun cart exceeds the
wetted diameter of throw. Application volumes
should be read as soon as the last gauges stop being
wetted.
0
•
•
0

E
Row of
collection >
gauges
Direction of travel
HARD HOSE AND CABLE TOW TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
Reel cart >
Left Right
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gun
cart
Wetted diameter�_�
(320 feet)
At feast one wetted
diameter end of field
Figure 1. General layout and orientation
of collection gauges for calibration of a hard hose and cable tow traveler irrigation systems.
,CALIBRATION PROCEDURES
T = Determine the wetted diameter ofthe gun
' t
2 Determine the number of collection gauges andispac�ng;between gauges 1ssr.a wetted daameter of�3�0
fee#, the rarn-gauge spacing should not eiiceed 20 feet{320 ft / ] 6 20`ft)
3 Label: gauges outward #rom the gun cart�as eEther left or'nght (Ii; L2, L3, etc,'R1, R2;R3, etc) �x
4n, — k
4 Set out gauges along a row,as labeled and shown mF�gvre 1, equallyspacedLat the distance"determinedan 21
iterr� 2 {2fl #eet) me row shiould,be at16st one Wv etted diameter #rbft' either end bf thi�ipul 'The first _ z�
gaugeach side of the travel lane soue312
#ildfb<the gauge spacing frorrtfie centyer o� theane F e onar a
gauge f.� 2�0 feetospaetng LCl'-^ai nd-- ir•L+,l wshor'u?.?ldY bae-r 1 Q f�e. er�t,fr,do-Ymi s�Fth�e. cen� te-sr3:or{ftthe,lane=.6{x s
1'`.- ->: +:-`. .,� � y - �. � •..rF.N �" Fy a #i-„C 41.�1y..�_��,�.�'.t� .�'• .t x+. �jr�— �'�.:r� j� e-r �� ,e
j: Operate the'system for the time regwredfor thetiguw q comple#ely fsass�allZ
'co llvection costa nerswRecord
sg.
F thew'startjngtime:that wastewatertbeginsato�be applied along -the row of=gauges and the;endingtarne
5 ; when wastewater no ionger�ls being applied anywhere along the row Alsarecord the dEstarsce traveled'En tz,;
r -- s { -, T' r e i e r - r F .� y+ .t -n •+.. � Yr �_�-�?3.3 e�ku�,•
afeetfor the.. time pf.-_op�era#�on '$ �,. y{+vx, r 4 .' ''.. x�a`'..��i� ,��„-{���K, ��ti� 4`. E{ �# vL'� �hC,:r'�S' iF•!c'�f i�?e
a ,� -"5 _- �� �` ix` �{ 'r'-, ""^s�y�. ti.�y .`'} ` - •X� � sM� -.,,,� �+ r:r � # - .,,,r�l'-- „ � � ���"•F)F �+,^• � dY
_6 _.Imrhed�ately-.;record'the aRiounts`colteetedan each aatiae. (Refer to Tablerlgfa�fran"examRle )�,' U'��::.r,
\

Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
Lane 1 Lane 2
Reel cart
Left Right
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
left Right
8 716 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6'7 g Gun
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 O O O O O O 0 cart 1
Direction of travel I Gun
cart
e. Effective lane s acing
(224 feet
II
E
Figure 2. Accounting for overlap
when calibrating a hard hose traveler system.
CALIBRATION PROCEDURES (continued)
t f
Effective lane s acing
(224 feet
9. Add the amounts collected in all gauges and divide by the number of gauges within the effective area. This
is the average application depth (inches) within the effective lane spacing.
Sum of amounts collected in all gauges
Average application depth =
Number of gauges within effective width
10. Calculate the deviation depth for each gauge. The deviation depth is the difference between each
individual gauge value and the average value of all gauges (#7). Record the absolute value of each
deviation depth. Absolute value means the sign of the number (negative sign) is dropped and all values are
treated as positive. The symbol for absolute value is a straight thin line. For example, 121 means treat the
number 2 as an absolute value. It does not mean the number 121. Because this symbol can lead to
misunderstandings, it is not used with numbers in the worksheets at the end of this publication. The
symbol is used in formulas in the text.
Deviation depth = ]Depth collected in gauge i — average application depth]
"i" refers to the gauge number
11. Add amounts in #10 to get "sum of the deviations" from the average depth and divide by the number of
gauges to get the average deviation.
Sum of deviations (add amounts computed in #10)
Average deviation depth =
Number of gauges within effective lane spacing
12.The precipitation rate (inches/hour) is computed by dividing the average application depth (inch) (#9) by
the application time (hours) (#5)
Average application depth (inch)
Precipitation rate =
Application time (hours)

•
CALIBRATION PROCEDURES (continued)
13. Compute the average travel speed
Average travel speed =
Distance traveled (feet)
Time (minutes)
14. Determine the application uniformity. The application uniformity is often computed using the
mathematical formula referred to as the Christiansen Uniformity Coefficient
It is computed as follows:
Average depth (#9) — Average deviation (#11)
U, = X 100
Average depth (#9)
15. Interpret the calibration results. The higher the index value, the more uniform the application. An index of
100 would mean that the uniformity is perfect — the exact same amount was collected in every gauge.
For travelers with proper overlap and operated in light wind, an application uniformity greater than 85 is
common.
Application uniformity between 70 to 85 is in the "good" range and is acceptable for wastewater
application.
Generally, an application uniformity below 70 is considered unacceptable for wastewater irrigation using
travelers. If the computed Uc is less than 70, system adjustments are required. Contact your irrigation
dealer or Certified Technical Specialist for assistance.
Table 1. Example calibration data for a traveling gun system operated in parallel lanes. Lane
spacing 70 percent of sprinkler wetted diameter.
a. Manufacturers' Specifications: Gun Model 150 Type Tal2er Bore
Nozzle Dia. 0.9 inch Pressure (Gun) si Reel 105 psi
Wetted diameter 320 ft Effective Spacing 224 ft Flow 197 GPM
Hose Size: Length 800 ft Diameter 3 in r
b. Spacing between collection containers (spacing 320 (ft) / 16) = 20 ft
c. Number of gauges = 16
d. Start of Irrigation event 7:15 a.m.
e. End of Irrigation event 9:00 a.m.
f. - Duration (e-d)_ 105 minutes
g. Travel distance320 feet
h. Operate the system and collect data.

Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
Table 1. Calibration Data (continued)
Gauge Distance Volume Overlap
Corrected
Deviation
No. from Center Collected Adjustment
Volume
from Average"
(feet) (inches) (inches)
(inches)
(inches)
L1 10 .94
.94
.235 (1 - D
L2 30 .80
.80
.095 (2 - j)
a
L3 50 .59
.59
.115 ( etc)
L4 70 .61
.61
.095
L5 90 .50 .13.
.63
.075
L6 110 .42 .20
.62
.085
L7 130 .33
L8 150 .07
RI 10 .73
.73
.025
R2 30 .81
.81
.105
R3 50 .92
.92
.215
R4 70 .64
.64
.065
R5 90 ..50 .07
.57
.135
R6 110 .27 .33
.60
.105
R7 130 .20
R8 150 .13
*Absolute value; treat all values as positive.
I. Sum of all volumes collected in #h 8.46 inches
j. Average catch (Unumber of gauges within effective width (12)
0.705 inches
Distance traveled (ft)
320 ft.
IL Compute the average travel speed =
_
= 3.04 ft/min
Time (min)
105 min
average depth (inches) 0.705 in
I. Precipitation rate = - = 0.40 in h
.application time (hour) 1.75 hr
m. Sum of deviations from the average catch 1.356
n. Average deviation from average catch (m/12) 0,113
o. Uniformity coefficient
0.705 - 0.113
Ur = X 100=84
0.705
p. Interpret results. Uniformity coefficient of 84 is in the good range for a traveler
system. No adjustment
is necessary.
0

HARD HOSE AND CABLE TOW TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
:0
Irrigation System Calibration Data Sheet for Hard Hose Traveler Irrigation System
DATE: Land Owner Farm No.
a. Manufacturers' Specifications: Gun Model Type
Nozzle Dia. w In Pressure (Gun) (Reel)
Wetted diameter ft Effective Spacing ft Flow GPM
Hose Size: Length ft Diameter in
b. Spacing between collection containers (diameter eft) / 16) = ft
C. wetted diameter (ft)
Number of gauges =
gauge spacing (ft)
d. Start of Irrigation event
e. End of Irrigation event
f. Duration (e-d) min
o d vwd
g. Travel distance feet
h. Operate the system, collect data,
and record on the worksheet on page 8.
L Sum of all catches inches
j. Average catch (i/number of gauges) inches
Distance traveled (ft)
k. Average travel speed = Time (min)
I. Sum of all deviations from the average catch
m. Average deviation from average catch
n. Uniformity coefficient
U, = x 100 =
Left Rot
6 7 6 5 4 1 2 1 1 2 3 4 i 6 7 e
000000a0 00000000
I Left Right
E 716 5 4 3 2 1 , 2 3 4 s 6 7 Gun
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I c�
1 �p� 1
(224 hep"
Interpret the calibration data and make necessary adjustments.
For travelers with proper overlap and operated in light wind, an application uniformity Coefficient greater than
85 is common.
Application uniformity between 70 to 85 is in the "good" range and is acceptable for wastewater application.
Generally, an application uniformity below 70 is considered unacceptable for wastewater irrigation using
travelers. if the computed Uc is less than 70, system adjustments are required. Contact your irrigation dealer or
Certified Technical Specialist for assistance.
0

` Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
Calibration Data (continued)
Gauge Distance Volume Overlap Corrected Deviation
No. from Center Collected Adjustment Volume from Average*
(feet) (inches) (inches) (incites) (inches)
Ll
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
LS
L9
L10
Rl
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
R10
*Absolute value;
treat all values as positive, ravel
Left Right
Row & 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
cdk4ctlon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
gaLe3
Gun
can
Direction of travel
Wetted dlameter At least one wetted
(320 feet) diameter end of field
to
1a

NO dk Cal ibration-Pro4eclures.
.
:.
:.
fior Animal 1Nast6' ater.Apptication„Equipment
`r
STATHIC)INARRY:
SPRINKLE
IRRIGATION. SYSTEM
WE
I rm-1-mm"
t
cq_0 L
North Carolina. Cooperative
Fxtensian Service
North Carolina State University

Field Calibration -Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
STATIONARY
SPRBNKLER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
General Guidelines
Land application equipment used on animal production farms must be field
calibrated or evaluated in accordance with existing'design charts and tables
according to state rules that went into effect September 1, 1996. Technical
Specialist certifying waste management plans after September 1, 1996, must
also certify that operators have been provided calibration and adjustment
guidance for all land application equipment. The rules apply to irrigation sys-
tems as well as all other types of liquid, slurry, or solid application equipment.
Information presented in manufacturers' charts are based on average
operating conditions for relatively new equipment. Discharge rates and appli-
cation rates change over time as equipment ages and components wear. As a
result, equipment should be field calibrated regularly to ensure that applica-
tion rates and uniformity are consistent with values used during the system
design and given in manufacturers' specifications. Field calibration is a simple
procedure involving collection 'and measurement of the material being
applied at several locations in the application area. This publication con-
tains step-by-step guidelines for field calibration of stationary sprinkler
irrigation systems.
Operating an irrigation system differently than
assumed in the design will alter the application rate,
uniformity of coverage, and subsequently the appli-
cation uniformity. Operating with excessive pressure
results in smaller droplets, greater potential for drift,
and accelerates wear of the sprinkler nozzle. Pump
wear tends to reduce operating pressure and flow.
With continued use, nozzle wear results in an in-
crease in the nozzle opening, which will increase the
discharge rate while decreasing the wetted diameter.
Clogging of nozzles or crystallization of main lines
can result in increased pump pressure but reduced
flow at the sprinkler. Plugged intakes will reduce
operating pressure. An operating pressure below
design pressure greatly reduces the coverage diameter
and application uniformity. Field calibration helps
ensure that nutrients from animal waste are applied
uniformly and at proper rates.
The calibration of a stationary sprinkler irrigation
system involves setting out collection containers,
operating the system, measuring the amount of
wastewater collected in each container, and then
computing the average depth of application (applica-
tion volume) and application uniformity.
An in -line flow meter installed in the main
irrigation line provides a good estimate of the total
volume pumped from the lagoon during each irriga-
tion cycle. The average application depth can be
determined by dividing the pumped volume by the
application area. The average application depth is
computed from the formula:
Average application depth (inches) =
Volume pumped (gallons)
27,154 (gal/ac-in) X Application area (acres)
The average application depth is the average
amount applied throughout the field. Unfortunately,
sprinklers do not apply the same depth of water
throughout their wetted area.Urider normal operat-
ing conditions, application depth decreases towards
the outer perimeter of the wetted diameter. Station-
ary sprinkler systems are designed to have overlap of
50 to 65 percent of the wetted sprinkler diameter to
compensate for the declining application along the
03

Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
outer perimeter. When operated at the design pres-
sure, this overlap results in acceptable application
uniformity.
When operated improperly, well -designed systems
will not provide acceptable application uniformity.
For example, if the pressure is too low, the application
depth will be several times higher near the center of
sprinkler and water will not be thrown as far from the
sprinkler as indicated in manufacturers' charts. Even
through the average application depth may be accept-
able,. some areas receive excessively high application
while others receive no application at all.
When applying wastewater high in nutrients, it is
important to determine the application uniformity.
Collection containers distributed throughout the
application area must be used to evaluate application
uniformity. Many types of containers can be used to
collect flow and determine the application unifor-
mity. Standard rain gauges work best and are recom-
mended because they already have a graduated scale
from which to read the application depth.
Pans, plastic buckets, jars, or anything with a
uniform opening and cross section can be used,
provided the container is deep enough (at least 4
inches deep) to prevent splash and excessive evapora-
tion, and the liquid collected can be easily trans-
ferred to a scaled container for measuring. All con-
tainers should be the same size and shape.
All collection containers should be set up at the
same height relative to the height of the sprinkler
nozzle (discharge elevation). Normally, the top of
each container should be no more than 36 inches
above the ground. Collectors should be located so
that there is no interference from the crop. The crop
canopy should be trimmed to preclude interference
or splash into the collection container.
Calibration should be performed during periods
of low evaporation. Best times are before 10 a.m. or
after 4 p.m. on days with light wind (less than 5
miles per hour. On cool, cloudy days the calibration
can be performed any time when wind velocity is less
than 5 miles per hour.
General Guidelines for Stationary
Sprinklers
Rain gauges or other collection containers should be
spaced in a grid pattern fully enclosing the "effective"
wetted area defined by the sprinkler spacing. The
most common spacing pattern for stationary sprin-
klers is a square spacing where the distance between
sprinklers is the same as the spacing between laterals.
The spacing between sprinklers and laterals is nor-
mally between 50 to 65 percent of the sprinkler
wetted diameter specified by the manufacturer.
Collection gauges should be placed one-fourth
the lateral line length from the main and no further
apart than one-fourth the wetted sprinkler radius or
effective sprinkler spacing. (For example, if the
effective spacing is 80 feet, spacing between gauges
should be no more than 20 feet).
The grid pattern and number of gauges required
to complete the calibration depends on the pattern
of operating -the irrigation system. The size of the
calibration area should be no less than the "effective"
area of one sprinkler. When sprinklers are arranged in
a rectangular or square pattern with proper overlap,
an "effective area" receives flow from four sprinklers.
Thus, a minimum of four sprinklers should be
included in the calibration.
The reliability of the calibration generally im-
proves as more sprinklers are included in the calibra-
tion area. If all sprinklers contributing flow to the
calibration area are functioning correctly, it is neces-
sary to include only the minimum number of
sprinklers as described in the preceding paragraph.
But, a malfunctioning sprinkler can greatly influence
the calibration results. Its effect on the calibration
depends on the calibration setup and number of
sprinklers being calibrated, the malfunctioning
sprinkler's position within the calibration area, the
direction of the prevailing wind, and the nature of
the malfunction. For these reasons; it is extremely
important to observe the performance of every
sprinkler contributing to the calibration while the
calibration is being performed and to record any
obvious performance irregularities. The more sprin-
klers that can be included in the calibration, the
more representative the calibration results will be of
the entire field and the less influence one malfunc-
tioning sprinkler will have on the calibration results.
The volume (depth) collected during calibration
should be read as soon as a zone or sprinkler is shut
off to minimize evaporation from the rain gauge.
Where a procedure must be performed more than
once, (Setups 3, 4, or 5 described below) containers
should be read and values recorded immediately after
each different set up.
Operating patterns affect collection container
layout and calibration procedures and results. Typical
0

patterns for stationary
sprinklers include:
1. Square sprinkler spacing LT 511
operated as a block (two or
more adjacent laterals
operating at the same time)
Figure 1 or Figure 2.
The calibration area may L2
be positioned or centered `- 521
between the two laterals la
as shown in either Figure 1
or Figure 2. Four sprinklers
contribute flow to the L3
calibration area in the setup S31
shown in Figure 1, while.six Calibration area loc
sprinklers contribute for the lateral length from
setup shown in Figure 2. If
all sprinklers are function-
ing properly, similar results
would be obtained with
either setup.
In case 1, with no wind
effects, all four sprinklers
should contribute equal
flow to the calibration area
(provided all sprinklers are
functioning properly). If Ll S11
one of the four sprinklers is
functioning improperly, the
calibration results are not
biased by its position within
the calibration area. >_.2
In case 2, six sprinklers c
contribute flow to the .c 521
calibration area, but their
contribution is not equal.
Sprinklers S13 and S, L3
contribute much more flow
to the calibration area than
sprinklers S12 S14 S22 or S24'
('The first number refers to
the lateral number and the
second number refers to the
sprinkler number along the
lateral.) The setup shown in
Figure 2 provides the advantage of more sprinklers
contributing to the calibration, but the disadvantage
of the results potentially being biased by sprinklers S13
and S23 if they are malfunctioning,
STATIONARY SPRINKLER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
16
Catch
512 I } ,`S13 I 1 S14
522 ` J�% 523 ` , I 524 J SzLa�ral
Catch can spacing Calibration area
S32 S33 S34 S35
aced 1/4Spdnper
m main lateral line I� spacing �I
calibration area = Sprinkler spacing x Lateral spacing
Figure 1. Layout of collection containers for calibration of a stationary sprinkler
system operated in a block design. In setup shown, four sprinklers contribute to
the calibration.
16 '
Catch cans
S12 I A S13 I I S14 I 1 S1 s
522 IE-3 524 S25
lateral
Catch can spacing Calibration area
531 532 S33
Calibration area located Y4
�^ lateral length from main —�
534 535
� Sprinkler �
Lateral ,line spacing
Figure 2. Collection container layout for calibration of a stationary sprinkler system
operated in a block design. In setup shown, six sprinklers contribute to the
calibration.
For a square sprinkler spacing with collection
gauges set at one-fourth the distance of the sprinkler
spacing, the minimum number of collection gauges
required to perform the calibration is 16. Step-by-step
a

Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
procedures for this pattern
are presented in the Case I S11Lateral A
example on page 6.
2. One lateral operating at
a time with standard
overlap from adjacent
v
laterals — collection S21 lateral B
containers must be placed A
on each side of the lateral,
Figure 3, which requires
twice as many collectors
(minimum 32). 531
A second alternative is
to perform the procedure Calibration ar
twice, once on each side of F— lateral length
the lateral using 16 contain-
ers at a time, Figure 4. When
selecting this alternative,
pay attention to changes in
operating conditions, such
as change in wind speed or
direction, that could result
in variability.
In either alternative,
the amounts collected must
be combined to account for S11 Lateral A
overlap. Step-by-step
procedures for this cabbra-
tion pattern are presented
in the Case II example on
page S. C Lateral B
3. One lateral operating s 521
with no overlap between
laterals -- typical case when
large gun -type sprinklers are
operated in narrow fields, S31 Lateral C
Figure 5.
Calibration procedure is- Calibration area f
similar to procedure in #2 lateral length fro
except outer edges do not
receive overlap and must be
excluded from the effective
area calculations. Collection
gauges may be centered
about one sprinkler or
positioned between two adjacent sprinklers.
One of two approaches can be used to perform
this calibration. A general rule in irrigation design is
to assume that the width of the effective area is
32 Catch cans
S1_2 S13 S14 515
1& O * 09 013 � : A
Left half
70 011 01
4 O CS230 2 016
10 O O 013
�OJ 60 alf
x Right half
30 -7G- —81T 0 15-
S32 40 80S33012 016
ea located A �� j
from main IIII
Lateral sine
Lateral
spacing
SI34 535
Sprinkler �I
Ih� spacing
Figure 3. Collection container layout for calibration of a stationary sprinkler system
with one lateral operating at a time. For setup shown, both sides of lateral are
calibrated in one operation.
512 .513 514 515
L
o 09 013
10 014 11 O
40 80 012 016
522 523 524 S25
Lateral
16 Catch cans spacing
S32 533 534 S35
ocated 7/4 — >1 / sprinkler
m main Lateral line spacing
Figure 4. Collection container layout for calibration of a stationary sprinkler system
with one lateral operated at a time. For the setup shown, the procedure must be
performed twice, once for lateral A, once for lateral B.
: between 50 to 65 percent of the wetted diameter of
the sprinkler (often 60 percent is used). The first
calibration approach accepts this design guideline
that the effective width of the lateral is 60 percent of
�J

c
2
Lateral A
Lateral
TO 20 .30; o;4N
5a'. `oM1' io 08
40. ` ildl 0 12
140 150
L41.0 142 0 E43 0
O L44
"01333
R11 Q R1 Q R130;;
' 0 R14
o'A23 0`:
4
R31 O,R3
O R34
R41 O'Ad]O
O s44
STATIONARY SPRINKLER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Field ditch
compute the average
application depth for the
effective area.
For the second altema-
Effective width
five, the entire width of
60% of
wetted diameter
the field is included in the
calibration as shown in
Figure 5 (Lateral 13). At Ieast
16 gauges should be set
out on each side of the
lateral. The calibration can
be performed all at once
Field ditch
(both sides of the lateral
which requires 32 gauges)
or the procedure can be
performed twice, once on
Field
width
each side of the lateral
using 16 gauges at a time.
The "non -zero" volumes
collected are averaged to
get a "preliminary" average
application depth for the
wetted area Next th
Figure S. Collection container layout to calibrate a single lateral line with no overlap fe
from adjacent lateral. Either setup shown (lateral A or lateral B) may be used. average application depth
16 Catch
cans 1 03 04
Gun 1 Gun 2 5 0 0 6 7 0 8 Gun 3
90 0 70 110 12
130 1 0.15016
for each row of gauges is
computed (rows are
assumed to be oriented
parallel to the lateral). In
this computation, zero
values are included. Those
rows whose row average is
less than one-half the
average from the entire
wetted area are then
excluded and assumed to
fall outside the effective
area. The effective width is
the distance from the
1/4 Lateral length Gun lateral line to the furthest
from main spacing
row from the lateral that is
retained. Step-by-step
Figure 6. Collection container layout to calibrate a stationary gun system when each procedures for this method
gun is operated separately (not head to head). are given in the Case III
example on page 9.
the wetted diameter of one sprinkler. Sixteen gauges 4. Big gun sprinkler operating Individually, Figure 6.
are set out as shown in Figure 5 (Lateral A) (B'gauges ? Procedure must be repeated for each gun sprinkler or
on each side of the lateral) with all 16 gauges posi- sprinker position (hydrant) contributing to the
tioned within the effective sprinkler width. The outer effective area being calibrated. This operating situa-
edges are ignored at the onset of the calibration. Flow tion results where one or two guns or big sprinklers
from all sprinklers is summed then averaged to are moved from hydrant to hydrant throughout the
Field ditch
Gun 4 Effective width
60% of
wetted diameter
0

Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
field. Since stationary big guns should not be oper-
ated "head to head." (two or more sprinklers throw-
ing water on the same area simultaneously); the
procedure must be repeated several times.
Collection gauges may be centered about one gun
sprinkler. This setup requires that the procedure be
performed three times, once while Gun 2 operates,
again when Gun 3 operates, and a third time when
Gun 4 operates. Collection gauges may also be
centered between Gun 2 and 3 or Guns 3 and 4 as
shown in Figure 6. (Actual location depends on the
length of the lateral). In this setup, the procedure
would be performed twice since only two guns or
gun locations contribute to the calibration.
CASE I. Block Pattern with 2 or more laterals operating simultaneously
-(Scenarios shown in Figures 1.and 2)
1. Determine the effective sprinkler area. (Area defined by sprinkler spacing along a lateral multiplied by the
spacing between laterals. (Example: 80 feet by 80 feet are typical for a solid set wastewater system). The
effective sprinkler area is the minimum area to be included in the calibration area. Note: The calibration
area can be more than the effective area of one sprinkler.
2. Determine the necessary spacing between collection gauges (1/4 the sprinkler spacing). For an effective
sprinkler spacing of 80 feet, the rain gauge spacing should not exceed 20 feet. (80 ft / 4 = 20 ft). Gauges
closest to the sprinklers should be placed a distance of 1 /2 the gauge spacing from the sprinkler. For a
gauge spacing of 20 feet, the first row of gauges should be 10 feet from the lateral line or sprinklers:
3. Determine the number of gauges required. (Minimum number is 16.)
Calibration area (ft)
Number of gauges
Gauge area (ft)
Example: Calibration area = 80 ft x 80 ft= 6400 W
Gauge area = 20 ft x 20 ft = 400 ftZ
6400 ftZ
Number of gauges = =16 gauges
400 ftZ
4. Set out gauges in a rectangular pattern as shown in Figure 1 or 2, equally spaced at the distance
determined in item 2 (20 feet) within the calibration area.
5. Operate the system for normal operating time for a full cycle. Record the time of operation (duration in
hours).
6. Immediately record the amounts collected in each gauge. (Refer to Worksheet No.1 for an example.)
7_ Add the amounts in #6 and divide by the number of gauges. This is the average application depth
(inches).
Sum of amounts collected in all gauges
Average application depth =
Number of gauges
0

STATIONARY SPRINKLER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
CASC:L tc6pdnuel�
alculate the deviation-depih for.each gauge. The deviation depth is the difference between each
individual gatige-value aril the average value of.all gauges (#7). Record the absolute value of each
deviation depth (absolute value means the sign of the number (negative sign) is dropped and all values
are treaied.as positive). The symbol for'a6solute value is a straight thin sine. For exam ple,121 means treat
the,number 2-as an�absolute value. It does not mean the number 121. Because this symbol can lead to
misunderstandings,. it' is not used with numbers in the worksheets at the end of this publication. The
:.syinbol-is:used fn formulas in the text. .
Deviationdgpth = iDepth'collected in gauge) — average application depthl
"i" refers' the gauge number
9: Add...amounts,Iri:#8'to.get "sum of the deviations" from the average depth and divide by the number of
gauges to get thezverage,deviation.
' -Sum of deviations (add amounts computed in #8)
. Average deviation depth-
v Number of gauges
10 1he predlpiWbnfate- (Inches hour) is computed by'dividing the average application depth (inch) by the
applicatian`time(hou"rs)7 7;;_,;
Average application depth (inch)
Precipitation rate =
Application time (hours)
11: Determine the application uniformity. The application uniformity is often computed using the
'rnathematical formula referred to as the Christiansen Uniformity Coefficient. It is computed as follows:
Average depth (47) — average deviation (#9)
Average depth (#7)
X 100
12. Interpret the calibration results. The higher the index value, the more uniform the application. An index
of 106 would mean that the uniformity is perfect — that the exact same amount was collected in every
gauge.,
An`appl!cation uniformity greater than 75 is excellent for stationary sprinklers.
Application uniformity between 50 to 75 is in the "good" range and is acceptable for wastewater
application.
.Gen. ralfy, an -application uniformity below 50 is not acceptable for wastewater irrigation with stationary
sprinklers. -If the computed'U, is less than 50, system adjustments are required. Contact your irrigation
dealer or Certified Technical Specialist for assistance.
0

meld Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
CASE If: Single lateral operated at one time but receives overlap from -adjacent laterals.
(Scenarios shown in Figures 3 and 4)
1. Determine:the effective sprinkler=area. (Lateral spacing times sprinkler spacing along lateral).
Z. Determine the necessary.spacing between collection gauges. (Lateral spacing divided by 4). Gauges
closest to the sprinklers should be placed a distance of one-half the gauge spacing from the sprinkler.
3. Determine the number of gauges required.
❑ Minimum number is 32 to perform the procedure in one setup, Figure 3; or
❑ One side of lateral calibrated at a time requires 16 gauges, procedure performed twice, first
operating Lateral A (Figure 4) then repeated without moving gauges and operating Lateral B.
4. The amount collected on one side of the lateral must be added to the amount collected from respective
positions on the other side of the lateral. This is necessary to account for overlap from adjacent laterals.
The collection gauges should be labeled to indicate their respective positions, such as left or right of
the lateral.
5. Set out gauges in a rectangular pattern as shown in Figures 3 or 4, equally spaced at the distance
determined in item 2.
6. " Operate the system for normal operating time for a full cycle. Record the time of operation (duration in
hours).
7. Immediately record the amounts collected in each gauge. (Refer to Work Sheet No. 2 for an example). If
only one side of the lateral is calibrated at a time, after recording collection amounts, empty and move the
collection containers to the other side and repeat steps 5 through 7 for exactly the same time duration as
recorded in item 6.
8. Collection amounts from pairs of cans should be added to simulate overlap. Contents should be combined
from one side of the lateral to the other side as shown in Figure 3. Referring to Figure 3, container L1 is
combined to 111, L2 to R2, L3 to R3, L4 to R4, L5 to R5, and so on.
9. Add the amounts from all containers and divide by the number of gauges on one side of the lateral. This is
the average application depth (inches).
Average application depth =
Sum of amounts collected in all gauges
Number of gauges on one side of lateral
10. Calculate the deviation depth for each gauge. The deviation depth is the difference between combined
depth for each position (values computed in #8) and the average application depth (#9). Record the
absolute value of each deviation depth. Absolute value means the sign of the number (negative sign) is
dropped and all values are treated as positive. The symbol for absolute value is a thin straight line.
Deviation depth = ]Depth collected at position 1— average application depth]
"I" refers to the gauge position within the effective calibration area
11. Add amounts in #10 to get "sum of the deviations" from the average depth and divide by the number of
gauges (number of gauges on one side of lateral) to get the average deviation depth.
Sum of deviations (add amounts computed in #10)
Average deviation depth =
Number of gauges on one side of latera[
CO

STATIONARY SPRINKLER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
CASE U. (continued)
12. Determine the application uniformity. The application uniformity is.ofte"h corjiputed.using the '
mathematical formula referred to as the Christiansen Uniformity Coetcient:;lt is.computed as follows:
Average depth (#9) — average deviation (#11) ".'.
U,_ X 100';..-
Average depth (#9)
13. Interpret the calibration results. The higher the index value, the more uniform the'application. An index of
100 would mean that the uniformity is perfect -- the exact amount was collei id -in every gauge.
An application uniformity greater than 75 is excellent for stationary sprinklers:'.,: -`,,
Application uniformity between 50 to 75 is in the "good" range and is'acceptable: forwastewater
application.
Generally, an application uniformity below 50 is not acceptable for wastewater: irrigation. If the,computed
U, is less than 50, system adjustments are required. Contact your ie6gation.8ealer:orCertlfied Technical
Specialist for assistance.
CASE Ill. Single lateral or Gun Sprinkler without overlap from adjaiteiit laterals.
(Scenarios shown in Figures' S or 6)
1. Determine the wetted diameter of a sprinkler or field width.
2. Determine the necessary spacing between collection gauges. The spacing in the direction along the lateral
should be one-fourth the effective sprinkler spacing. The gauge spacingperpendicular to the lateral should
be 1 /8 the wetted diameter or width of the field.
Effective sprinkler spacing in feet
Spacing between collection gauges parallel to lateral-
.4
Sprinkler wetted diameter in feet
Spacing between collection gauges perpendicular to lateral =
8
3. Determine the number of gauges required.
❑ Minimum number is 32 to perform the procedure in one setup (both sides of lateral at the
same time).
❑ One side of lateral calibrated at a time requires 16 gauges, procedure performed twice, once on
each side of the lateral.
4. Set out gauges in a rectangular grid pattern as shown in Figure 5, spaced at the distances determined in
item 2, Be sure to label gauges by rows (rows should be oriented parallel to and outward from the lateral
line). The first row of gauges should be located 1 /2 the gauge spacing from the. lateral.
5. Operate the system for normal operating time for a full cycle. Record the time of operation (duration in
hours).
70,

Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
CASE 111: (continued)
6. ' Immediately record the amounts collected in each gauge. (Refer to Work Sheet No. 3 for an example). If
only one side of the lateral is calibrated at a time, after recording collection amounts; empty and move the
collection containers to the other side and repeat steps 4 through 6 for exactly the same time duration as,
recorded in item 5.
7. Add the "non -zero" amounts collected and divide by the number of gauges with a non -zero amount, This
is the "preliminary" average application depth (inches) within the "wetted" calibration area.
Average application depth =
Sum of nonzero amounts collected
Number of -non -zero gauges
S. Determine the average application depth by rows. Include zero catches In the row computations.
Sum of collection amounts from all gauges on the row
Average row application depth =
Number of row gauges .
9. Identify and delete those rows whose average application depth (#8) is less than one-half the preliminary
average application depth (#7).
10. Determine the effective application width. The boundary is defined as the distance from the lateral to the
last row furthest from the lateral that is retained.
11. Determine the average application depth within the effective area. Add amounts from all gauges in rows
within the effective width (Rows retained in #9 and #10).
Corrected average application depth =
Sum of amounts collected in rows within effective width
Number of gauges within the effective width
12. Calculate the deviation depth for each gauge. The deviation depth is the difference collected in each
usable gauge and the average application depth (#11). Record the absolute value of each deviation depth.
Absolute value means the sign of the number (negative sign) is dropped and all values are treated as
positive. The symbol for absolute value is a thin straight line.
Deviation depth = IDepth collected at position i — average application depth (#11)1
"i" refers to the gauge position within the effective calibration area
13.Add amounts in #12 to get "sum of the deviations" from the average depth and divide by the number
of gauges.
Average deviation depth =
Sum of deviations (add amounts computed in #12)
Number of gauges within the effective width
14. Determine the application uniformity. The application uniformity is often computed using the
mathematical formula referred to as the Christiansen Uniformity Coefficient. It is computed as follows:
U = Average application depth (#11) —average deviation (#14) X 100
Average depth (#11)

STATIONARY SPRINKLER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
CASE Ill. (continued)
15. Interpret the calibration results. The higher the index value, the more uniform the application. An index of .
100 would mean that the uniformity is.perfect — the exact amount was collected in every gauge.,
An application uniformity greater than 75 is excellent for stationary sprinklers.
Application uniformity between 50 to 75 is in the "good" range and is acceptable for wastewater
application.
Generally, an application uniformity below 50 is not acceptable for wastewater irrigation. If the computed
U; is less than 50, system adjustments are required. Contact your irrigation dealer or Certified Technical
Specialist for assistance.
W O R K S H E E T 1. Example calibration data for a stationary sprinkler system operated in a block
pattem. (Setup as shown in Figure 1)
a. Effective sprinkler area: 80 ft by 80 ft = 6400 ftx
b. Spacing between collection containers (spacing 80 (ft)/4) = 20 ft
C. calibration area (W) 6400 ft'
Number of gauges = = = 16
effective gauge area (ft� 20 ft x 20 ft
d. Start of Irrigation event 7:15 a.m.
e. End of Irrigation event 9:30 a.m.
€. Duration (e-d) 2.25 hours
g. Operate the system -and collect data
Gauge No.
Volume
Collected
(inches)
Deviation from
Average*
(absolute value)
Gauge No.
Volume
Collected
(inches)
Deviation from
Average*
(absolute value)
1
.57
.005
9
.51
.065
2
.69
.115
10
.26
' .315
3
.83
.255
11
.36
.2.15
4
.65
.075
12
.52
.055
5
.61
.035
.13
.79
.215
6
.38
.195
14
.65
.075
7
.27
.305
is
.61.
.035
8
.64
.065
16
.86
.285
* Record the absolute value of each deviation, so all values are treated as positive.
�J

Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
WORK SHEET 1. (continued
h. Sum of volume collected in all catches 9.20 inches
1. Average application depth (h/c) (9.2/16) .576 inches
0.576.inches
J. Precipitation rate = - = 0.26 inches/hour
(2.25 hour)
k. Sum of all deviations from the average depth 2.31
1. Average deviation from average depth (k/c) 0.144
m. Uniformity coefficient
0.576 —0.144
Ur. = X 100 = 74.9
0.576. -
n. Interpret Results. Uniformity coefficient is in the good range, so no adjustments are necessary
W O R K S H E E T 2. Example calibration data for a stationary sprinkler system, one lateral
operated at a time. (Setup as shown in Figure 3.)
a. Effective sprinkler area: 80 ft by 80 ft = 6400 ft'
b. Spacing between collection containers (spacing 80 (ft) / 4) = 20 ft
C. ft Calibration area (ftD 2 x 80 ft'x 80
- Number of gauges = _ = 32
Effective gauge area (ft2) 20 ft x 20 ft
d. Start of Irrigation event 7:15 a.m.
e. End of Irrigation event 9:30 a.m.
f. Duration (e-d) ' 2.25 hours
g. Operate the system, collect data, and record on the works heet on page 13, opposite.
h. Sum of all catches 10.91 inches
I. Average application depth (h/16) 0.682 inches
J. Sum of all deviations from the average depth 1.866
k. Average deviation from average depth 0.117
1. Uniformity coefficient
0.682 — 0.117
U, = 0.682 X 100 = 82.8
m. Interpret Results. Uniformity coefficient is in the excellent range fora stationary sprinkler system.
No adjustment necessary.
j74

STATIONARY SPRINKLER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
W_ O R K S H E E T .. 2. (continued)
Volume
Overlap
Deviation
Gauge No.
Collectgd
Adjustment
from Average'
(inches)
Ll
.00
.67 (1-1 + R1)
.012 (L1+R1) - i)
L2
.15
64 (L2 + 112)
.042 (L2+R2) - i)
L3
.38
.72 (1.3 + 113)
.038 (etc)
L4
.71
.71 (L4 + 114)
.028
L5
.02
.86 (L5 + R5)
.178
L6
.20
.79 (etc)
.108
U
.43
.53
.152
L8
.78
..80
.118
L9
.04
.82
.138
L10
.33
.94
.258
1-11
.51'
.74
.058
L12
.69
.69
.008
Ll 3
.00
.51
.172
L14
.11
.44
.242
L15
.37
.47
.212
L16
.58
.58
.102
*Record the absolute value; treat all values as positive.
R1
.67
R2
.49
R3
.34
R4
.00
R5
.84
R6
.59
R7
.10
R8
.02
R9
.78
R10
.61
RI 1
.23
R12
00
R13
.51
R14
.33
R15
.10
R16
.00
ru

Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
W O R K S H E E T 3. Example calibration data for a stationary sprinkler system, one lateral
operated at a time, no overlap from adjacent laterals. (Setup as shown in Figure 5, lateral B.)
a. Determine the wetted diameter of a sprinkler;
From manufacturers literature, wetted diameter is 160 feet, sprinkler spacing along lateral is 100 feet.
b. Determine the necessary spacing between collection gaugm
sprinkler spacing 100 [feet]
parallel to lateral = _ = 25 feet
4 4
perpendicular to lateral =
sprinkler wetted diameter 160 feet
8
8
= 20 feet
c. Determine the number of gauges required.
Will calibrate both sides of lateral at one time so need 32 collection gauges
First row of gauges should be located a distance of 1 /2 the gauge spacing from the lateral line. i.e.,
if the gauge spacing is 20 feet, first row of gauges should be 10 feet from the lateral.
d. Start of irrigation event 7:15 a.m.
e. End of irrigation event 9:30 a.m.
f. 'Duration (e-d) 2.25 hours
g. Operate the system and collect data
h. Add the non zero amounts collected and divide by the number of gauges with a non -zero amount. This is
the average application depth (inches) within the "wetted" calibration area.
Sum of non zero catches in column 3 =12.59 inches
Number of gauges with non -zero catch = 28 gauges
12.59 inches
Average catch all non -zero gauges = = 0.45 inches
28 gauges
1. Determine the average application depth by rows. Include zero catches in the row computations.
Row averages are shown in column 4.
j. Identify and delete those rows whose average application depth (#i) is less than one-half the average
application depth (0).
Application depth of Row L4 is 0.05 inches and Row R4 is 0.04 inches so discard row 4 values on both sides
(left and right) of lateral.
k. Determine the effective application width.
Row 3 is last usable row and is located 50 feet from lateral (column 3). Therefore, effective width is 50
feet on each side of lateral or 100 feet total.
f6

STATIONARY SPRINKLER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
WORK S H E @ T
3. (continued)
Distance
Volume
Row..
Usable
Deviation
Gauge No.
from:
Collected
Average
Values
from Average
Lateral
(inches)
L11
10
.77
.77
.260
L12
10
69
.69
.180
L13
10
.83
.83
.320
L14
10
.65
.74
.65
.140
L21
30
.61
.61
.100
L22
30
.57
.57
.060
L23
30
.48
.48
.030
L24
30
.44
.53
.44
.070
L31
50
.31
.31
.200
L32
50
.22
.22
.290
L33
50
.18
.18
.330
L34
50
.29
.25
.29
.220
L41
70
.12
L42
70
.0
L43
70
.0
L44
70
.08
.05 (discard)
R11
.160
10
.67
.67
R12
10
.79
.79
.280
R13
10
.81
.81
.300
R14
10
.77
.76
.77
.260
R21
30
.59
.59
.080
R22
30
.51
.51
.000
R23
30
.62
.62
.110
R24
30
.5
.56
.50
.010
R31
50
.37
.37
.140
R32
50
.17
.17
.340
R33
50
.15
.15
.360
R34
50
.24
.23
.24
.270
R41
70
.07
R42
70
.0
R43
70
.0
R44
70
.09
.04 (discard)

Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
W O R K 5 H >E E T 3. (continued)
!. Determine the average application depth within the effective area. Add amounts from all gauges in rows
within the effective width (Rows 1, 2, and 3 on both sides of lateral.)
Usable values are shown in column 5 sum of amounts collected in rows within effective width (sum of
column 5) = 12.23 inches
12.23 inches
Average application depth = = 0.51 inches
24 gauges
m. Calculate the deviation depth for each gauge. Values shown In column 6.
Deviation depth = f Depth collected at position i — average application depth (#I)f
i refers to the gauge position within the effective calibration area
n. Sum of deviations (sum of values in column 6) = 4.511 inches
4.511 inches
Average deviation depth = = 0.188 inches
24 gauges
o. Determine the application uniformity.
0.51 inches (#I) — 0.188 inches (#n)
X100=63.1
0.51 inches (#I)
p. Interpret the calibration results. An index value of 63 percent is acceptable for a stationary sprinkler system
No adjustments are needed.

STATIONARY SPRINKLER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Irrigation System Calibration Data Sheet for Stationary Sprinkler
Date Farm Tract No.
a. Effective sprinkler area: Lateral spacing ft by spacing along lateral ft =
Sprinkler: Make Model Nozzle Dia. Discharge GPM
Pressure: Sprinkler Pump Pressure
b. Spacing between collection containers (sprinkler spacing (ft)/4) _ _ ft
c. Number of collection containers
d. Start of Irrigation event
e. End of irrigation event
f. Duration (e-d) hours
g. Operate the system, collect data, and
record on the worksheet on page i B.
h. Sum of all catches inches
o-
30
'o
1
30
0
r
20
0
12110
20
600
140
1O
220
20
30
30
'o
'0
'$0
'0
20.
0
�0
11 'o
Igo
'0
'0
�0
20
0
30
1. Average application depth (h/c) inches
(i)
j.. Precipitation rate = — inches/hr
(fl
k. Sum of all deviations from the average catch
1. Average deviation from average application depth
m. Uniformity coefficient
(i) — (1)
Uc= X100=
(i)
Interpret the calibration results.
An application uniformity greater than
75 is excellent for stationary sprinklers.
Application uniformity between 50 to
75 is in the "good" range and is
acceptable for wastewater application.
Generally, an application uniformity
below 50 is not acceptable for waste-
water irrigation. If the computed U, is
less than 50 percent, system adjustments
are required. Contact your irrigation.
dealer or Certified Technical Specialist
for assistance.
ft2
0
Wind direction
^ Wind speed
'0
$0
0
'0
'0
�0
z 0
Zo
20
SO
100
140
10
2 0
26O .
300
3O
'O
i'0
' 0
' 0
2 0
0 27
30
4 0
8O
i 0
160
Z40
240
28'
32
,N

NEUHOFF 2S2 7S6 8414 0St12f04 0S:08pm P. 002
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number:+' - t County: h' .
Facility Name:
Certified Operator Name: r. C;. ; F. Operator #
t
1. -Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Lagoon Name/Identifier (ID): E =>
Spillway (Yes or No):
Level (inches):
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations -of one or more structures --
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
�( acceptable ranges.
` Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables- Included within this plan is a list of the
proposed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop information.
Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to transfer of waste
to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste management plan.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
- if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste; L5;_— ;5 '- 0
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached Plan
of Action,. and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and correct.
7—
Manager (print)
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
Phone- —S: ?
Date: _ L —C
PoA Cover Page 2/21/00

NEUHOFF 252 756 8414 0Sf12/04 os:oepm P. 008
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE .
1. Structure Name/Identifier (lla):
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard .--'inches'
c. line b -- line a (inches in red zone) _ inches
r
d. top of dike surface area according to design . i f `' `.q: ft2
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c x line d x 7.48 allons gallons
12 ft3
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design - ' days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design ft3
h. actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = ft3 :•
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design ft3
t
j_ excess rainfall over evaporation according to design ft3
k. (lines h + i +i) x 7.48 x 30 days = . gallons .
line f
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 5-
m. (lines e + k) x line
1000
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE
J E ? Ib/1000 gal.
f ' lb PAN
t'
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00 1

NEUHO FF
252 7S6 8414 05/12l04 0S:08pm P. 004
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): 3 -
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 126
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) - =
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c x line d x 7.48 al_c�lons --
12 ft
inches .
3 inches
`j inches
ft2
S t" 1 0 2 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design -ft3
h. actual waste produced = current herd # x line g ft3
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i +i) x 7.48 x 30_ days =
line f
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated l 3`
m. (lines e + k) x line I -
1000
ft3
/ 0 ? 9 V l-, cs. gallons
�� fa lb/1000 gal.
lb PAN
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE
11. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.I24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
PoA (30 Day) 2121100 1

NEUHDFF 252 756 e414 05/12/04 os:oepm P. oos
11. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25Y'R./24-
HR.'STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY l-
'structure ID: line m lbPAN
2. structure ID. line m lb PAN
3. structure ID:
4. structure ID:
5. structure ID:
6. structure ID-.
line m = lb PAN
line rn =
lb PAN
line m =
lb PAN
line m -
lb PAN
n. lines1+2+3+4+6+6 Ib PAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAYDRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CAN NOT 13F APPLIES DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD-
o. tract #
p- field #
q. crop
r. acres
s., remaining
IRR-2 PAN
balance
(lb/acre)
t TOTAL PAN
BALANCE
FOR FIELD
(lbs.)
column r x a
U.
application
window'
`State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available receiving
crops during 30 day drawn down period
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column Q lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00 2

NELJHOFF 2S2 7S6 8414 0St12104 06:08pm P. 006
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = lb. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) = lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = _ I ^} '" lb. PAN
J.
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here
including pump and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd
reduction options, recalculate new PAN based on new information. If new fields are to be
included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these fields to the PAN balance table and
recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to another permitted
facility provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
NARRATIVE:
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100 3

F W A rF
RQG
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
`O�0
0
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
>
Division of Water Quality
❑
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
February 19, 2004
Mr. Jimmy Neuhoff
Neuhoff Farms Inc (AG)
P.O. Box 314
Beulaville, NC 28518
Subject: Compliance Inspection Report for February 11, 2004
Neuhoff Farms Inc (AG)
Facility Number: 67-1 _
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Neuhoff:
Please find the enclosed copy of the inspection report for the visit to Neuhoff Farms Inc
(AG) Farm on February 11, 2004. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call me at (910)
395-3900 ext. 226.
Sincerely,
C ester Cobb
Environmental Specialist II
S:1WQSIANIMALSI0NSL0W12004167-1 Inspection Report 2-11-04
N. C. Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension [phone]
Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington, NC 28405 [phone] Fax
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748
0 A
h1CIDENR

PW . V
North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regional office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
To: Keith Larick
From: Chester Cobb
OF W A TF�4
-0 QG
r
o -�
Fax: [phone] Pages: 2
Phone: [phone] ext. 571 Date: 10/17/2003
yRe: Address Change CC: [Click here and type name]
❑ Urgent ❑00*.�ase Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle
• Comments:
Keith. A change of address was sent to our office for Neuhoff Farms, Inc. I believe the only farm they own in
our region is Advanced Genetics Farm in Onslow County. In the database, this should be Facility # 67-1. 1 am
not sure if this would be for all Neuoff own farms. I am also assuming that you are the one who can change
information in the database.
Chester

NEUHOFF FARMS, INC.
P. O. BOX 158,408 W. HARGETT ST. • RICHLANDS, NC • 28574
[phone]
FAX [phone] 7082003
T
October 6, 2003
Mr. Rick Shiver
NC Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3900
Dear Mr. Shiver:
Please change the mailing address for Neuhoff Fauns, Inc. to the address listed below
effective immediately.
Neuhoff Farms, Inc.
504 W. Main Street
PO Box 314
Beulaville, NC 28518
This will be effective for the Advanced Genetics Farm in Onslow County.that is
served by the Wilmington Regional. Office.
'thank you!
James H. Neuho l� Jr.
President

To: Stoney Mathis
From: Jimmy Neuhoff
Date: 1/7/02
Subject: Information for the Advanced Genetics farm
Enclosed is the permitting information Gus Simmons provided concerning our
Advanced Genetics farm in Richlands. One sheet shows "before dike repairs" and the
other "after dike repairs." The dike repairs were completed this fall as you saw during
your last visit. Therefore, the `before dike repairs" sheet should not be applicable to
our permitting process.
You mentioned at your last visit that it may be possible to permit the farm as it is.
Gus had mentioned than we need to remove sludge from.the lagoons and we are going
to start that process this month with microbial digestion. QVe are told it will be spring
before the microbes reach a high level of activity and digest the appropriate amount of
sludge. Please give me a call when you know how our permit will be handled.

LAGOON #1
Top of Dike Elev:
49.21
STAGE -AREA VOLUMES
Bottom Elev:
42,00
Elevation WT. 1
Area (SE)
Incr. Vol. (Cu, ED
9gMU
Vol. LCu. Fll
41.00
393.46
42.00
14,319.73
7.357
7,357
43.D0
58,437.69
36.379
43,735
44.00
60,743.61
69.591
113.326
45.00
97,901.43
89,323
202,646
46.00
110,370.56
104.136
306,784
47.00
120,269.93
115.330
422,115
48.00
128,962.85
124,626
546,741
49,00
135,994.21
132,470
679,220
LAGOON #2
Top of Dike Elev:
46,51
STAGE -AREA VOLUMES
Bottom Bov:
40.00
Elevation (Fr. I
Area ($f)
;nu• Vol, (Cu._170
Cumul.
Vol. (Cu. F n
40.00
9,128.14
41.00
14,419.83
11.774
11.774
42.00
( 18,971,71
16,696
28.470
43.00
23,149.05
21,060
49,530
44.00
26,947.03
25,048
74,678
45.00
30,365.67
2B,656
103,236
46.00
33.093.94
31,730
134,964
LAGOON #3
Top of Dike Elev:
45.21
STAGE -AREA VOLUMES
Bottom Bev:
35.00
Elevation (FT.1
Area (SFl
Incr. Vol. (Cu. FT]
Cumul.
Vol. {CU- FT)
35.00
1,236.65
36.00
37,411,63
19,324
19,324
37.00
50,326.24
43,869
63,193
38.00
61,629.09
55,978
119,171
39.00
72.613.67
67,121
186,292
40,00
79.509.61
76,062
262,354
41,00
B4,333.03
81,921
344,275
42.00
08,732.94
86.533
430.808
43.00
92,713.43
90.723
521,531
44.00
96.043974
94,379
615,910
45,00
99,296.81
97,670
713,580
LAGOON #4
Top of Dike Elev:
43.86
STAGE -AREA VOLUMES
Bottom Bev:
36.00
Elev
Area (SF) .
Inor. Vol. (Cu. FT1
Cumul.
Vol. (Cu. FT1
33.00
999.02
34.00
6,989,74
3,994
3,994
35.00
29,006,85
17,998
21,993
36.00
48,29&09
38,652
GD,645
37.00
51.749.23
50,024
110.669
38.00
55,094.70
53.422
164,091
39.00
58,274A4
56,684
220.775
40.00
61,287.54
59.781
- 280,556
41.00
64.134,90
62.711
343.267
42.00
66.RM.81
65,352
408,619
43.00 -
66,425.93
67,497
476,116
44.00
70,095.36
69,261
545,377
FREEBRD I STARTPMPI ENDPVMP
BELOW
44.00
1t3320
FREEBRO
47.63
437250
ABOVE
45.00
202048
BELOW
44A0
113320
SLUDGE
4580
274100
ABOVE
45.00
202048
Net Lagoon
Volume (Total
- Sludge):
163,162
FREEBRD I STARTPMPI ENDPUMP
BELOW
44.09
74576
FREEBRO
44 63
18t1S9
ABOVE
45.00
103235
BELOW
43.00
40530
SLUDGE
43.40
50540,
ABOVE
44.00
7457a
at Lagoon Volume (Total - Sludge): 41.584
FREEBRD I STARTPMP I ENDPUMP
)EPTH (FT} ELEV ELEV
1.581 43.631 40.85
BELOW
FREEBRD
ABOVE
BELOW
43.00
-121531
STARTPMP
43.83
580675
ABOVE
44,00
6i5B10
BELOW
33.00
1=4 .... -
SLUDGE
35Ao
38872
ABOVE
37.00
63193
BELOW
40.00
202354
ENDPUMP
40.85
33..
ABOVE
41.00
.4275
at Lagoon Volume (Total
- Sludge): 543,803
FREEBRD
STARTPMP I ENDPUMP
DEPTH
ELEV ELEV
1.00
39.59 33.00
ELEV
VOLUME PERCENT.
BELOW
42.00
408019
FREEBRD
42.86
4a5W7
ABOVE
43.00
416110
BELOW
39.00
2211715
STORM
39.SB
258204
ABOVE
40.00
280550
BELOW
39.00
220715
STARTPMP
39.59
258204
ABOVE
40.00
2BU556 '
RELOW
36.00
50645
SLUDGE
36.00
9064,
ABOVE
37.00
110860'
35.00
36.00
37.00
38.00
39.00
40.00
41.00
42.00
43.00
44.D0
45.00
0.00
33.00
34.00
35.00
36.00
37.00
38.00
39.00
40.D0
41,00
42.00
43.00
44.00
Net Lagoon Volume (Total - Sludge):
195,559
Without Sludaa:
TOTAL AVAILABLE VOLUME:
1,585,744
Cu. FT
TOTAL AVAILABLE VOLUME:
11,061,365
Gallons
Required
W(O Sludge
Percent
TOTAL AVAILABLE STORAGE:
92
Days
Tamp
473,754
504,951
107%
Treat
870,330
870,330
100%
With Sludge:
Storm
210.463
210,463
100%
TOTAL USEABLE VOLUME:
1,565,744
Cu. FT
TOTAL SLUDGE VOLUME
431,173
Cu. Fr
TOTAL AVAILABLE VOLUME:
1,154,571
Cu. FT
Required
WO Sludge
Percent
TOTAL AVAILABLE VOLUME
8,636,194
Gallons
Tamp
473.754
73,778
16%
TOTAL AVAILABLE STORAGE:
67
Days
Treat
870,330
870,330
100%
Storm
210,463
210.463
100%
1194-7
or
1

LAGOON #t
STAGE -AREA VOLUMES
l 1E e1ia (FT,) Ten )
Area ($F]
41.00
393.46
42.00
14,3I R73
43.00
58,437.69
44.00
80,743.61
45.00
97,901.43
46.00
110,370.56
47.00
120,289.93
48.00
128,962.65
49.D0
135,994.21
LAGOON #2
STAGE-ARFA VOLUMES
Elevation (FT.)
Area (SQ
40.00
9,128.14
41.00
14.419.83
42.00
18,971.71
43.00
23,149.05
44.00
26,947.03
45.00
30,365.67
46.00
33,093.94
LAGOON #3
STAGE -AREA VOLUMES
Elevation fFT.)
ea
35,00
1,236.65
36,00
37,411.63
37.00
50.326.24
38.00
61,629.D9
39.00
72,613.87
40.00
79,509.61
41.00
84,333.03
42.00
BB,732.94
43.00
92,713.43
44.00
96,043.74
45.00
99,296.81
LAGOON #4
STAGE -AREA VOLUMES
Etevaton (FT.)
Area
33.00
999.02
34.00
6.989.74
35.00
29,006.85
36.00
48,298.09
37.00
51,74923
38.00
55,094.70
39.00
58,274.14
40.00
61.287.54
41.00
64,134.90
42.00
60.56"1
43.OD .
60,425-93
44,00
70,0%.36
W7thout SIU{}2E
TOTAL AVAILABLE VOLUME:
TOTAL AVAILABLE VOLUME:
TOTAL AVAILABLE STORAGE:
With Sludae:
TOTAL USEABLE VOLUME:
TOTAL SLUDGE VOLUME:
TOTAL AVAILABLE VOLUME:
TOTAL AVAILABLE VOLUME,
TOTAL AVAILABLE STORAGE:
WRh Proposed Sludae Levels:
TOTAL USEABLE VOLUME:
TOTAL SLUDGE VOLUME:
TOTAL AVAILABLE VOLUME:
TOTAL AVAILABLE VOLUME:
TOTAL AVAILABLE STORAGE:
SludaeSluyd_� Removal:
RemO� l:
Volume of Sludge to Remove;
Volume of Sludge to Remove:
Top of Dike Bev:
50.00
Bottom Elev:
42.00
ln__r _ 42L (9u_FnC V i (Cu. F42L (cU_1V i fCu. fl
CumCur ,_ �Cj. Vyo�,
Cuj
7,357
7,357
36.379
43,735
69.591
113,326
89,323
202,648
104,136
306,184
115,330
422,115
124,626
546,741
132.479
679,220
Top of Dike Elev:
46.51
Bottom Elev:
40.01)
Inca Vol. (Cu. FTl
Cumul. Vol.
(Cu. D
11,774
11,774
16,696
26,470
21,060
49,530
25,046
74,57E
20.656
103,235
31.730
134,964
Top of Dike Elev:
46.00
Bottom Bev:
35.00
J a Vol, (Cu. Fit
Cumul. Vol, Qj. FTt
19,324
19.324
43.869
63.193
55,978
119,171
67,121
186,292
76.062
262.354
81.921
344,275
86,533
430,80E
90,723
521,531
94,379
615,910
97.670
713.580
Tap of Dike Elev:
45.00
Bottom EIew
35.00
Ina, Vol, (Cu.
Cumul, Vol ICU. FT)
3,994
_ 3,994
17,SKA
21,993
36,652
60,645
50,024
110,669
53,422
164,091
56.684
220,775
59.781
_ 200,556
62,711
343,267
65.352
40B,619
67.497
470.116
69,261
545,377
1,810,950 Cu. FT
13,545,904 Gallons
105 Days
FREE6R0 I STARTPMPI ENDPUMP
WPT14 (FTI ELEV ` FLEV
BELOW
44.00
11332e
FREEBRo
40.42
507834
ABOVE
45.00
20204e
BELOW
44.00
113328
SLUDGE
45.80
274108
ABOVE
45.00
202648
Net Lagoon
Volume (Total - Sludge): 233,727
FREEBRO J STARTPMPI ENDPUMP
BELOW
44.00
74578
FTIEEBRD
44.fl3
101133
ABOVE
45.00
103235
BELOW
43 OD
49530
SLUDGE
43.40
59549
ABOVE
44.00
74570
Net Lagoon Volume (total
- Sludge): 41,584
35.00
36.00
37.00
38.00
39.00
40.00
41.00
42.00
43,00
44.00
45.00
0.00
Net Lagoon Volume (Total • Sludge): 619.734
FREEBRO I STARTPMP I ENDPUMP
E'-E1f;2-
PERCENT. 33,00
34,00
BE1AlV
-ABOVE
44_007
FBEEBRD
44.007
35.00
45.007
36.00
BELOW
40.00
37,00
STORME
STORM
40A7
30.00
ABOVE
41.00
39.00
BELOW
40A0
40.D0
STARTPMP
40.67
41,00
ABOVE
41.007
42.00
BELOW
3a.0o
00045 . • 43.00
SLUDGE
30.00
60645 44.00
ABOVE
37.00
110889
Net Lagoon Volume (Total - Sludge): 274.269
Required W/O Sludge Percent
Temp 473,754 730,157 154%
Treat 870,330 870.330 100%
Stone 210,463 210,463 100%
1,810,950 Cu. FT
431,173 Cu. FT
1,379,777 Cu. Fr Required W/O Sludge Percent
10,320,732 Gallons Temp 473,754 298,984 63%
8D Days Treat 870,330 070,330 100%
Storm 210,463 210,463 100%
1,810,950 Cu. FT
250,000 Cu. FT
1,SBQ950 Cu. FT
11,875,9Cations 90
90 Days
191,173 Cu. FT
1,355072 Gallons

P. 1
COMMUNICATION RESULT REPORT ( APR.16.2003 3:11PM )
` TTI NCDENR WIRO
FILE MODE OPTION - ADDRESS (GROUP) RESULT - -----PAGE--
------ -
-----------
646 MEMORY TX ---- 8-9103242443
REASON FOR ERROR
E-1) HANG UP OR LINE FAIL
E-3) NO ANSWER
��
E-2) BUSY
E-4) NO FACSIMILE CONNECTION
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
FAX COVER SHEET
Date: `-f �/d la � - No. Of Pa es:
To: )I/Leo, J?er4 oj,, From ';0?E 4!i S
CO: AI ev h'P'' d w --^ v—, ` CO: D—f,167 I
FAX#: Io -_3Z 2g43 FAX#: [phone]
REMARKS: 'Plc^5e �';1
i
127 Cardhial Drive Exteovion, Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845 Tt1rphane (910) 39W900 Fax [phone]
An 14gaal Opportunity Alilrmadve Adon Employer
4/01.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
FAX COVER SHEET
Date: q Ili O 3
To: lglferl
CO: N ev h&ieY
FAX #: q to - 3 2-4 — 24L4 33
REMARKS: Ptc�-,se r; 1)
No. Of Planet'l
es:
From: h;s
CO: Dtyl - -- -
FAX#: [phone]
d 4 tte 3
30 da 1f iPI a tn �i_c� a��igc�i- Lat_k _le, /ne -4
r� ;we ,v,c C-RlI 'nw .,003
i h' h k-;r , S�OoeL7
e Cove/
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3945 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
1 �j-Id3_

Re: Neuhoff Sow Farm 67-1
Subject: Re: Neuhoff Sow Farm 67-1
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:31:59 -0500
From: Sue Homewood <[e-mail]>
Organization: DWQ
To: Stonewall Mathis <[e-mail]>
here is the last addinfo i sent them that they never responded to
Stonewall Mathis wrote:
> Sue,
>
> As far as documentation that we need to issue a permit, I know that lagoon
> design info has been a concern. what other documentation do we need?
> Stoney
>
> Sue Homewood wrote:
> > Stoney,
> > The best I remember, I have not been in contact with Mr. Neuhoff about this
> > at all recently. Currently, I do not have appropriate documentation in my
> > file to issue -a permit to this facility. However, despite multiple requests
> > they have not adequately responded either. I would have liked to return the
> > application as incomplete and seek injunctive relief but the AGO is very
> > concerned about that legal process and weary to take it on given their short
> > staff problems. So, it remains in what I call "la la land". This email is
> > not to be forwarded please.
> >
> > However, I have had some informal conversations with Gus Simmons that he is
> > attempting to help Mr. Neuhoff get things in order so that he make submit
> > for a permit appropriately. I suggest if this is the engineer they are
> > referring to that it be a good thing to have Gus there to hear your comments
> > and help Mr. Neuhoff get things together.
> > Sue
> >
> > Stonewall Mathis wrote:
> >
> > > Sue,
> > > I am trying to set up to do the inspection at this farm. I am aware
> > > from Dean that there has been a concern over the lagoon setup at this
> > > farm, and we do not have lagoon design info that we need. I called to
> > > set up the inspection for 1212. I spoke with Phil Griffith. I told Mr.
> > > Griffith that I wanted to meet with Mr. Neuhoff and the engineer in
> > > order to resolve the lagoon design issue so that we can proceed with
> > > permit issuance. Mr. Griffith said that he thought that Mr. Neuhoff may
> > > have been in contact with you about this issue. I am writing this to
> > > ask you what correspondence you have had with Mr. Neuhoff about our
> > > concerns over the lagoons (and any other issues that I should be aware
> > > that I can investigate in the field).
> > > Thanks,
> > > Stoney
1 of 2 1 /24/2003 9:41 AM

Re: Neuhoff Sow Farm 67-1
Name: AWS670001-4th cert..doc
nAWS670001-4th cert..doc Type: Winword File (application/msword)
Encoding: base64
Download Status: Not downloaded with message
Sue Homewood <sue.homewood ncmail.net>
Environmental Engineer
Division of Water Quality
2 of 2 1 /24/2003 9:41 AM

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
December 12, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Neuhoff Farms Inc (AG)
1706 Woodwind Drive
Greenville NC 27856
Attn: James H. Neuhoff Jr.
A
IT V V
IL"
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS670001
Additional Information Request
Neuhoff Farms Inc (AG)
Animal Waste Operation
Onslow County
Dear James H. Neuhoff Jr.:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary review of the subject application.
Additional information is required before we can continue our review. A request for additional
information was sent on October 11, 2000 and to date this information has not been received. Please
address the following by January 11, 2000:
i . Previous inspections have noted concerns about storm storage management in the staged
lagoons at this facility. Please have an appropriate technical specialist or Professional
Engineer (PE) review the existing lagoons for storm management. Specifically please
address any surface drainage into any of the lagoons from surrounding areas. In addition,
since it has been noted during inspections that lagoons 1, 3, and 4 are managed at
maximum levels and flow into lagoon 2. It may be necessary to adjust the freeboard
requirement for lagoon 2, and possibly lagoon 3, to manage both structural freeboard as
well as a 25 yr, 24 hour storm event from all four lagoon. Please have the technical
specialist or PE specify the freeboard requirement necessary for lagoons 2 and 3. Please
also address the seasonal high water table when determining the freeboard requirements.
Please note that you may be required to install new liquid level markers in these lagoons.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical
specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested
information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the
address below. The information requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before January 11,
2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H
.0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. AWS670001
Neuhoff Farms Inc. (AG)
Page 2
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit
is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement
authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
Sincerely,
Sue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File

67-1 Advanced Genetics (Neuholl)
Subject: 67-1 Advanced Genetics (Neuhoff)
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 09:31:32 -0500
From: Dean Hunkele <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC Division of Water Quality
To: Sue Homewood <[e-mail]>
CC: Lyn Hardison <[e-mail]>,
Stonewall Mathis <[e-mail]>
Sue,
I talked with Jimmy today along the same lines as I have contacted the
other companies. He has indicated that he will contact Gus Simmons,
formally of BOC, to contact you regarding this permit & lagoon issue.
Gus works for an engineering firm here in Wilmington.
Jimmy indicated that all contract growers for Neuhoff have been sold to
Carolina & Howard. Point of contact is Prentice Herring at
252-568-3600. May want to pass this info along.
Dean
1 of 1 2/12/2002 8:42 AM

67-1
Subject: 67-1
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:58:30 -0400
From: Sue Homewood <[e-mail]>
Organization: DWQ
To: Dean Hunkele <[e-mail]>
Dean,
I reviewed the documentation for the lagoons at this facility. here's
the deal. lagoon number 2 has plenty of volume to hold the wastewater
from a 25 yr/24hr storm. however, i have the feeling that the operator
is probably managing it thinking he's only required to have 19 inches of
freeboard when he should have much more than that. also, this doesn't
take into account any surface drainage that goes into any of the
lagoons. i am going to ask in an addinfo letter for a tech. spec. or PE
to evaluate surface drainage and to determine the freeboard required in
the lag. 2 to manage a 25yr/24 hr. storm from all the lagoons.
the proper management of the facility at that level will be an issue
that you'll have to deal with through inspections/nov's etc.
does this sound good to you?
sue
I of 1 1/31/2001 9:14 AM

13 00 02:05p neuhaff Farms 19103324-3473 p.l
NEUHOFF FARMS, INC.
P. O. BOX 158,408 W. HARGETT ST + RICHLANDS, NC • 28574
[phone]
FAX [phone]
. ILI
Mr. Dean Hunkele
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
127 North Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
Dear Mr. Hunkelc:
In response to your letter dated May 22, 2000, we have developed the following
action plan to deal with deficiencies as outlined:
Animal Burrows in Lagoon Inner Dike Wall
Mr. Sam Jarvis, PE, inspected these busTOWS on 6/7/00 and found
minimal damage. He recommended the holes be filled with compacted
clay and a trapping program implemented. Should be completed by
8/4100.
2. Excessive Weeds on Dike Walls
Walls were mowed on 6/1/00 and we have contracted to have these
walls mowed twice per month during the growing season. Weed
control spraying will occur as necessary.
Lagoons Needing Improvement
A bacterial sludge reduction program was initiated on 4/13/00. This
program appears to be working and results will be evaluated for
effectiveness in February 2001. Medical debris was removed on
6/9/00 and a monthly cleaning schedule has been implemented. Sam
Jarvis surveyed the grade on 6/7/00 and will make recommendations
for re -shaping drainage pattenrs.
4. Inadequate Lagoon Marker
New markers were sited and installed by Sam Jarvis on 6/7/00. Waste
samples for lagoons #2 and 93 will be taken in July at the next
scheduled sampling.
5. Cover Crop Needs Improvement
A sprayer has been contracted for weed control. A regular harvesting
schedule has been implemented. Lime was applied in March 2000 and
will be evaluated this fall_
6. Insufficient Removal of Nutrients from Facility
It has been increasingly difficult to find users of hay to remove the
bales from the farm. In the vast we have given awav bales to anvone

�.lt;An' 13 00 02: 0 5 p Neuhof f Farms 1910) 324-3473 p _ 2
we could find. We will increase our efi'orts to locate hay users and
remove the harvested hay in a timely manner.
Hopefully, these corrective actions will provide a long-term solution_ I await your
response to the adequacy of this action plan.
Sincprely,
lames H Neuhoff, Jr_
President

t
NEUHOFF FARMS, INC.
P. O. BOX 158,408 W. HARGETT ST. • RICHLANDS, NC • 28574
[phone]
FAX [phone]
Mr. Dean Hunkele 89- o t
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
127 North Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
Dear Mr. Hunkele:
In response to your letter dated May 22, 2000, we have developed the following
action plan to deal with deficiencies as outlined:
1. Animal Burrows in Lagoon Inner Dike Wall
Mr. ' Sam Jarvis, PE, inspected these burrows on 6/7/00 and found
minima] damage. He recommended the holes be filled with compacted
clay and a trapping Program implemented Should be completed by
8/4/00.
2. Excessive Weeds on Dike Walls
Walls were mowed on 6/l/00 and we have contracted to have these
walls mowed twice per month during the growing season. Weed
control spraying will occur as necessary.
3. Lagoons Needing Improvement
A bacterial sludge reduction program was initiated on 4/13/00. This
program appears to be working and results will be evaluated for
effectiveness in February 2001. Medical debris was removed on
6/9/00 and a monthly cleaning schedule has been implemented. Sam
Jarvis surveyed the grade on 6/7/00 and will make recommendations
for re -shaping drainage patterns.
4. Inadequate Lagoon Marker
New markers were sited and installed by Sam Jarvis on 6/7/00. Waste
samples for lagoons 92 and #3 will be taken in July at the next
scheduled sampling.
Cover Crop Needs Improvement
A sprayer has been contracted for weed control. A regular harvesting
schedule has been implemented. Lime was applied in March 2000 and
will be evaluated this fall.
6. Insufficient Removal of Nutrients from Facility
It has been increasingly difficult to find users of hay to remove the
bales from the farm. In the Halt we have liven away bales to anvone
Im

we could find. We will increase our efforts to locate hay users and
remove the harvested hay in a timely manner.
Hopefully, these corrective actions will provide a long-term solution. I await your
response to the adequacy of this action plan.
Si rely, J
�� /
James H. Neuhoff, Jr.
President

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Neuhoff Farms Inc (AG)
1706 Woodwind Drive
Greenville NC 27856
Attn: James H. Neuhoff Jr.
Dear James H. Neuhoff Jr.:
I kT:'W'A
T4
0 •
Ul1 , i :3 ..:Jt]
1.
aE
-..�.�r` NIRT!-! CAF20L1NA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
October 11, 2000
Subject: Application No. AWS670001
Additional Information Request
Neuhoff Farms Inc (AG)
Animal Waste Operation
Onslow County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary review of the subject application. Additional information is
required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by November 10, 2000:
]. Previous inspections have noted concerns about storm storage management in the staged lagoons at this
facility, Please have an appropriate technical specialist or Professional Engineer (PE) review the existing
lagoons for storm management. Specifically please address any surface drainage into any of the lagoons
from surrounding areas. In addition, since it has been noted during inspections that lagoons 1, 3, and 4 are
managed at maximum levels and flow into lagoon 2. It may be necessary to adjust the freeboard
requirement for lagoon 2, and possibly lagoon 3, to manage both structural freeboard as well as a 25 yr, 24
hour storm event from all four lagoon. Please have the technical specialist or PE specify the freeboard
requirement necessary for lagoons 2 and 3. Please also address the seasonal high water table when
determining the freeboard requirements. Please note that you may be required to install new liquid level
markers in these lagoons.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter, must be
submitted on or before November 10, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N_C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
`Ucan l k
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
rely,
Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

m
m
Cu
m
0
M
L
M
LL
0
L
7
01
L
low tm
0141113W Mr
.UM ar
P" rj H 6k ri /� vel-e
LAGDCls 1
Average nsloe top eiR• = 4862 it.
Inside lop area : 141.324 sq ft,
A-erage bottom e?ay. - 39Z1 ft.
Batten art& a 121.716 sq. ft.
LAGOON 2
Average inside top alev. = 42.56 ft.
Inside tap area = 69.09 sq. ft,
Average tootton elev, a 33.09 ft.
Bolton area - 55,369 Sq. ft.
LAGOON 3
Averagt inside top elev. - 43.86 ft.
Inside top area - 100,664 sq, ft,
Average bottom etay. - 33.53 ft.
Bottom area = B2092 sq. ft..
LAGOON 4
Average "ide top e(ev. = 4551 ft.
Inside top areo - 33210 sq: ft.
Average bottom eid1c - 37.19 ft.�
Bottom area - 20213 Sq. ft.
It
.f
A,DVANCFD GENETICS
NEUBoPF SRINE PARx
QNS IF COUNTY, N.C.
wrml CARtir t=r.mixe 09 twvMWwua.
KK AK eo rarwa tisota M
w.s.� INei1a I���
�� NE'Jh4F�.LYG

I
■■■
1■■■
■
■N
SO
■■
■■N■■■■■■■MEN■■■■■■■■■■N■
■■■NOON
■■■
■
-
■■NON■■■■■
■ ■
/ �.
NOON
■ONE
ME
■■
■■
■!■■■■■
MEMENTOS
■■
■
l■N■
■
■ , .
/ ./ s
■
, ■■ ■■■,
■■
■
■IS ■■
■
_
■■MIMI■■■■
■■■■■■■■
■
■■
■
■■NN■
■■■■■
■N■■■
■■
■■
■
■�■
■ONE
■■■
■i■■i■
■
M
■NOMEN
ON
■
■
■■■■■
M
■
MEN■■
NNE
NOON
■■
■
■■■
■
NOON
■i
■■
■■
MESONS
MEMO
■■
■■
■
■
■
■■
■■
■■
■
■ ■■
■ ■ ■
..
■O ■
■ ■
mom ■■■■■■■■■■NNE
i ■■
■
.� r .
■
■
■
■
' -
i
,
■■■■■N■■■
■■■■i■i
NOON■■
■■
NO
■O
EMSEMEN
■■NN■O■■
IMMENSE
■■■■■■■
■■
■M■■■■■■■
r /
■■■■■Or■■■■
9•
r
-
,
■■■
■
i■■■rN■■NOON■■
■■■
■
■■■■■
i
■MEMO
■
mom
■
MOON■■
■ ■ MEN
■�■TOPS FORM 3 14SEE
D■
■■■
■■■N■
■■
■
■
NSOMEONE
■N■■
■■■■■■1

TO: Shannon Langley, Archdale
✓ Rick Shiver. Wilmington Re<oional Office
FROM: .Janet D. Leach Memoranalum
SUBJECT: NOTICE TO DWQ OF PETITION FOR A CONTESTED CASE HEARING
DATE: August 5, 2000 _
cc
COUNTY OF ONSLOW
'NEUHOFF FARMS, INC.
V
NCDENR
The petition for the above case was recently forwarded to this office from OAH.
The attorney representing the state in this matter is Mary Dee Carraway
The hearing is scheduled for the week of November 13, 2000.
In the event the case is not settled before the above mentioned hearing date. we will be gathering
information to prepare for the court date. This information will include, but is not limited to the
CPA, permit, all documentation leading up to the issuance of the CPA or information concerning
the permit, photos, correspondence and a list of witnesses.
If this documentation is routed through your office to someone else, please have that person contact
me immediately so that I will know who to communicate with for further information concerning
this case.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Tommy Stevens
Coleen 5�:1°=��
QO
�;,q-fie �5�� lalo�JTfo
IJoyf/,"
ich. Paralegal
orth Carolina
:neral's Office
ntal Division
9)716-6948
9)716-6766
IL

Mailed to Petitioner 7111100
PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY OR TYPE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
COUNTY OF(]) Onslow
(2) Neuhoff Farms, Inc. )
(your name) PETITIONER,
V.
►. . .. R-._ .M-.
PETITION
FOR A
CONTESTED CASE HEARING
of Environment & Natural Resources }
RESPONDENT. )
(The State agency or board about which you are complaining) )
1 hereby ask for a contested case hearing as provided for by North Carolina General Statute 150B-23 because the Respondent has:.
(Briefly state facts showing how you believe you have been harmed by the State agency or board.)
NCDENR notified Neuhoff Farms, Inc. by letter dated 6/15/00, which outlined a_civil penalty
in the amount of $500.00 and investigative costs of $135.36. Neuhoff Farms, Inc. acted
fully within the scope of the law and very responsibly in dealing with the results of a.
24-hour, 25-year rain event, "Hurricane Floyd". NCDENR improperly applied the law as in
relation to lagoon levels to this case, and the penalty should be dropped.
(If more space is needed, attach additional pages.)
(4) Because of these facts, the State agency or board has: (check at ]cast one from each column)
deprived me of property; exceeded its authority jurisdiction;
x ordered me to pay a fine or civil penalty; or x acted erronernusly;
otherwise substantially prejudiced my rights; AND failed to use proper procedure;
acted arbitrarily or capriciously. or
failed to act as required by law or rule.
(5) Date: 7 17 00 (6) Your phone number: (910 ) J324-3632 x 14
(7) Print your full address: P.O. Box 158 Richlands NC 28574
(street aaaresstp.o. ox) (city (state) (zip)
(8) Print your name: Jr. for Neuhoff Farms Inc.
(9) Your signature:
You must mail or deliver a COPY of this Petition to the State agency or board named on line (3) of this form. You should contact the agency
or board to determine the name of the person to be served_
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
certify that this Petition has been served on the State agency or board named below by depositing a cop)' of it with the United States Postal
Service with sufficient postage affixed OR by delivering it to the named agency or board:
(10) Dan McLawhorn ())) NCDENR
(name of person served) (State agency or board Iisted on line 3)
(12) 1601 Mail- Ser1Tir_p Genter, Raleigh. NC 2769g-1601
(street address/p.o. box) (city) (state) (zip code)
(13) Tnis the 1� 7 ,$ay of July A82000.
/_.. �OAF
-
(your signature)
When you have completed this form, you MUST mail or deliver the ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY to the Office of Administrative Hearings.
6714 Mail Scrvice Center, Raicigh. NC 27699-6714,
11-06 (l 1199)

Plitt Amendment to Include S&WCC Chronic Rainfall Practices and Standards tbrougb March 31, 2000
1, if this facility can comply with its existing permit and C:AWMP it must do so.
2. Temporary Additinn of New Sprnyf'ici(j! C) (Check appropriate boxes.)
0 A. acres of cropland. List crop tyres used:
(] R. rcr--s of hvdwood woodland @ 100 lbs PAN I acre added.
[J C. acres of pint woodland addrA @ 60 lbs PAN I mere added.
3- Sum mel-Rutnnial Grass (Check appropriate bor._)
LYE tion windrw extended for Sri• 0 acres of prrrnn!RI gms- until first killing frost -
An additional 50 lbs of PAN applied to z -9G ncres of perennial glass prior to killing frost.
4. TAN A bon lncrmsed for Small Grains do Winter Grasses to be hnrvecteA (Check npproprintz box.)
PAN application incseaced up to 200 lbs per acre for 5"A.94 Awes of small grains or winter grasses to be harvested.
0 S. PAN application increased up to 150 lbs per acre for acres of overseeded summer perednial included in 3. B.
5. Waste Analysis (Check appropriate box.)
[) A. Prior to December 1 ", 1999 the calculation of PAN will be based on it 35% teduction of the last analysis taken
pnor the Cu-st 25 year 24 hour storm event. (Current waste analysis must be used after Dec. 1" .)
Use current wane analysis to detrJmine PAN.
5. _Re wired - Maximum Nirrogtn Utilization Measures for Small Grains and Winter Grasses.
A. Use of hivher seeding rates,
$. Tknely harvest of forage to increase yield, and
C. Irrigating during prriods of warmer weather.
7. Re ug ired - irrigation Manrocmcni Techniques to Rviucs Punoff -and Ponding Potential.
A. Making fitqucnt, light irrigation applications, anri
D. Not irrigating immcdintcly before predicted rainfall.
8. The owner/ ttv=ecr Ls required to mnn-ge the mowmirnt of rnimals to and from the facility to minimize environrneata]
imppr-ts, ensure eamplianre with the faeiiiry's permit rand amcndcd CAVYW, and avoid diteharge to surface waters.
o Authorization to use the additional practices included in :hi[ -,mmdment expimt if a fazility discharges to sin face watets-
Any discltar-Ir, is r viniarion and may trcult in an enfnrccrntnt anion.
10. Th- o--ocr I oper>'ror is requir=d-to keep records of ail waste applications.
]1. rois revision must include a map ar sketch of new land applic--anon areas.
Faciliry Numbtr
�l fit/ j�•�fi ES i ��.� �J �.
Faciiir%- Oumtr I Mangier Name (PP.IIrT)
Facility Owner I. Manaacr Si"ann
Date
1Au /ars,s G.
Facility Name
—Al-r 5-1 V o N
Techniial Specialist hiamts 1111NM
Tecrcal SpecialiPignaturrr
Date
This document must be fled at the SWCD off ce nod be attached to the fstilities CAWMP
and be sf•ailrable for inspection nt the facility.
(') New temporary sprayfteld,, must meet applizzble busier and setbacl-. requirements. WK-At Must Dot bo applied to wetlands.
1111011999

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
September 15, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN_ RECEIPT_ REQUESTED
Neuhoff Farms Inc
Neuhoff Farms Inc (AG)
1706 Woodwind Drive
Greenville NC 27856
Farm Number: 67 - 1,
Dear Neuhoff Farms Inc:
01?W'A
IT 0 0
A&4417i
Nook
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Neuhoff Farms Inc (AG), in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC, must apply for
coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to
submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws
(Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified
by the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Susan Cauley at [phone] extension 546 or Brian
Wrenn with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone],
Sincerely,
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl_)
Wilmington Regional office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

G
m
�
co
�-
Ln
o ?� 2
}r a
`
A
1
m
$
o F
i tll% �
rC
4
p
�
b r1JPI $ O T C
Q
.a
P
LL
LL
a,
VV
CO
i*-,
§1
ter• � .O. � H
y d 3
z 8
•0
m
,�
�
m
❑
....
d li
715
°
o
t°S'
�
Jf
B
y
a
i
¢ H c
Z0
0.
J7
S664 W
3v
LTO ,
m
Q
i
Q f
'008C LUJ0J Sd
SENDER: I also wish to receive the
� ■Complete Rams t andlor 2 for additional services.
1 ■Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. following services (for an
■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee}:
i card to you.
■Attach this form to the f nt of the mailp;ece, or on the track if space does not 1. ❑ Addressee's Address
1
1 ■ permit. e Return Receipt Raqueste t- an the n�piece below the article number. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery 0 I
■The Return Recelpi will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
delivered. Consult postmaster for fee.
i
3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number
c 2 �1-ti FS ZZ l 034 C
4b. Service Type
❑ Reglsteredae�+- * Certified
70� ` ❑ ExpreEQy/ irFg ❑ Insured S
�
etu tlptforrpde ❑COD i .�
7. Date d E ! Nery_
27 49- 1
5. R F9ived By: (Print Name 8, Addressee's Add[(trtly if requested
��1GLnr3dn �1f ik-hc and tears wd) 1IS / C
6. Signpp: (Addressee or Age t)
c !/1 ems,
y' }
ea
PS Form 3811, December 1994
uomeStlC Netum Neceipt

State`bf North Carolina
Department of Environment
•
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
NCDEF4Ft
James B. Hunt Jr. Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 3, 1999
Certified Mail # Z 418 221 054
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Jimmy Neuhoff
Neuhoff Farms Inc.
1706 Woodwind Drive
Greenville, NC 27856
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Advanced Genetics
Facility Number: 67-1
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Neuhoff:
On September 30, 1998, staff from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of
Water Quality inspected your animal operation and the lagoon(s) serving this operation. It was
observed that the wastewater application rate applied to your spray field is beyond that allowed
in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan. In addition, the required lagoon liquid level
markers need to be properly leveled and you need to begin keeping weekly lagoon level records.
As I discussed with Mr. Allen Benton during the inspection, excessive hydraulic
application may be violation of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP), and
your Animal Operations General Permit. Subsequent infractions may result in a Notice of
Violation which may include further enforcement. The CAWMP_limits the loading rate of 0.35
inches per hour with a maximum of 1.0 inches total per application. I would recommend having
the irrigation system calibrated by an appropriate technical specialist. Lagoon level records must
be kept on a weekly basis. Eroded and bare areas in the spray field will need continued work to
eliminate sedimentation. Any assistance required in planning and implementing these or other
appropriate best management practices may be obtained from your service company or by
contacting the local Soil and Water Conservation District.
Please be aware it is a violation of North Carolina General Statutes and Rules to discharge
wastewater to the surface waters of the State without a permit and/or to fail to follow a certified
waste management plan. The Division of Water Quality has the authority to Ievy a civil penalty
of not more than $10,000 per day per violation.
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

i
Mr. Jimmy Neuhoff
Page 2.
When the required corrective actions are complete, please notify this office in writing at
the address below. if you have any further questions concerning this matter, please contact me
at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
David R. Holsinger
Environmental Engineer
cc: Bill Norris, Onslow County Soil and Water Conservation
Sandra Weitzel, NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Jimmy Neuhoff, Nuehoff Farms
W ilmington-Files
S:\WQS\DAVEMONSLOWk67-1B.DFF

-State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality JAN Q 3 z000
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor BY.
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Neuhoff Farms Inc
Neuhoff Farms Inc (AG)
1706 Woodwind Drive
Greenville NC 27856
Dear Neuhoff Farms Inc:
L �•0
F4 c'D E N R
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 67-1
Onslow County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers_
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLURI, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections_ Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
ON/
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Onslow County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerel ,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

WASTE
UTILIZATION
NEUHOFF FARMS
A. G. CENTER
ONSLOW COUNTY
raot�aerrrargr� .
• q
a SEAS. � 's
6242 4 C/) b
aa*
,S_A
a
4** aaa"'
Jarvis Associates,P.A.
130 East Second Street
Washington, NC 27889

' WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Jarvis Associates, PA
' Thursday, November 04, 1999 G�',JE40
Producer: Neuhoff Farms . 1 S \qq
' Farm Name: A.G. Center cq
1706 Woodwind Drive
Greenville,NC 27858
' Telephone # : [phone] Nd�'
Type of operation : Farrow to Weanling Swine
Number of Animals: 3000 sows design capacity
Application Method: Irrigation
' The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where
' waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly
encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be
' grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
' maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient contents of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop
' can utilize. Soil types are Important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching
potentials, cation exchange capacities, and avaialabie water holding capacities. Normally
waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With
special pre -cautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per
' year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under
DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind
' odor problems. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the
potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare
ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve
' nutrients and reduce odor problems. This plan is based on waste application through
irrigation for this is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you choose
to inject the waste in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for injecting
' waste and irrigating waste are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
' for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report
from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for ananlysis. This waste
' utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
Pang i of 10

1
I
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
3000 sows X 6.1 tons wastelsowslyear = 18300 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
3000 sows X 4.32 Ibs PAN/sows/year = 12960'PANlyear
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have
appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type and suface application.
TABLE 1 : ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE &CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES LBS AW APPLIC.
DETERMINING PHASE CODE WACRE NACRE USED TIME
1796
1
AUTRYVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
1.69
464.7
APR-SEPT
1796
1
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
100
0
1.69
169
SEPT - APR
3197
10
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
2.52
567
APR - SEPT
3197
- 10
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
2.52
252
SEPT -APR
3197
10-A
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
D
2.39
537.75
APR - SEPT
3197-
10-A
FORK 0-7%
WA
11
100
0
2.39
2391
SEPT - APR
3197
11
FORK 0.7%
BH
4.51
225
0
2.63
591.75
APR - SEPT
3197
11
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
2.63
263
SEPT -APR
3197
12
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
2251
0
2.35
528.75
APR - SEPT
3197
- 12
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
2.35
235
SEPT -APR
3197
13 1
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
2.35
528.75
APR - SEPT
3197
13
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
1 100
01
2.35
2351
SEPT - APR
3197
14
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.51
225
01
2.96
6661
APR - SEPT
3197
- 14
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
1 100
01
2.96
295
SEPT -APR
3197
15
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.51
225
0
2.52
567
APR -SEPT
3197
15
FORK 0.7%
WA
1
100
0
2.52
252
SEPT -APR
3197
15-A
FORK 0.7%
BH
4.5
225
0
0.9
202.5
APR - SEPT
3197
- 15-A
FORK 0.7%
WA
1
100
0
0.9
90
SEPT -APR
1796
16
AUTRYVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
2.45
673.75
APR - SEPT
1796
16
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
100
0
2.45
245
SEPT -APR
3197
16
AUTRYVILLE ALL
SH
5.5
275
0
2.45
673.75
APR -SEPT
3197
16
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
100
0
2.45
245
SEPT -APR
1796
2
AUTRYVILLE ALL
SH
5.5
275
0
1.07
294.25
APR -SEPT
1796
2
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
100
0
1.07
107
SEPT -APR
1796
3
AUTRYVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
01
1.26
346.5
APR - SEPT
1796
3
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
100
0
1.26
126
SEPT -APR
1796
4
AUTRYVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
2.97
816.75
APR - SEPT
1796
4
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
100
0
Z97
297
SEPT -APR
3197
5
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
1.47
330.75
APR -SEPT
3197
- 5
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
1.47
147
SEPT -APR
3197
6
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
4.22
949.5
APR - SEPT
3197
6
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
4.22
422
SEPT -APR
3197
7
FORK 0-7%
SH
4.5
225
0
2.28
513
APR -SEPT
3197
- 7
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
2.28
228
SEPT - APR
3197
8
FORKO-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
2.31
519.75
APR - SEPT
3197
8
FORK O-7%
WA
1
100
0
2.31
231
SEPT - APR
3197
9
FORK O-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
2.5
562.5
APR -SEPT
3197
9
FORKO-7%
WA
1
100
0
2.5
250
SEPT-APR
1796
S1
AUTRWILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
3.73
1025.75
APR -SEPT
1796
- S1
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
100
0
3.73
373
SEPT -APR
1796
S2
AUTRYVILLE ALL
SH
5.5
275
01
0.22
60.5
APR - SEPT
1796
- S2
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
lool
01
0.221
22
SEPT - APR
Pann 2 of 10

1
1.]
3197
S3
FORK O-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
2.2
495
APR - SEPT
3197
- 53
FORK O-7%
WA
1
100
0
2.2
220
SEPT -APR
3197
S4
FORKO-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
0.42
94.5
APR - SEPT
3197
- S4
FORK O-7%
WA
1
100
0
0.42
42
SEPT -APR
3197
S5
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5j
225
0
0.46
103.5
APR - SEPT
3197
- S5
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
0.46
46
SEPT -APR
3197
S6
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
0.59
132.75
APR - SEPT
3197
_ SB
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
0.59
59
SEPT -APR
3197
S7
FORK 0-7%
8H
4.5
225
0
1.41
317.25
APR - SEPT
3197
S7
IFORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
1.41
141
SEPT - APR
3197
SS
IFORK 0.7%
8H
4.5
225
0
0.26
58.5
APR - SEPT
3197
- S8
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
1001
0
0.28
26
SEPT -APR
1796
$9
AUTRYVILLE ALL
BH
5.
275
0
0.38
104,5
APR - SEPT
1796
- S9
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
11
1001
0
0.38
38
SEPT -APR
TOTALS: '18023
M Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
' summer annuals.
Indicates a Crop Rotation
1
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in
some eastern counties of NC to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Pana 3 of 110

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEAS
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specifications 2.)
There are no Acres Leased
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in field due to overseeding.
"*Lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial
nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in TABLES 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE CROP UNITS LBS NIUNIT
BH
HYBRID BURMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
5Q
WA
WINTER ANNUALS
AC
10Q
Panty A of 1n

TOTALS FROM TABLES 9 AND
ACRES LBS AW
' N USED
TABLE 1 52.961 18,023
TOTALS: �^ 62.96 18,023
' AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED. 12,960
BALANCE 4,063
' *** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste
N produced.
Acres show in each of the proceeding tables are considered to be the usable acres
' excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and
perimeter areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the
' tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of
' sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nurturient rich and will require precautionary
measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility
will produce approximately 2640 pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the
sludge that will need to be removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when
broadcasting the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well special
equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
' See the attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of
' irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture
content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of
' irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the
crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 5.92 months. In no instance should the volume
of waste being stored in your structure be within 1.58 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsiblity of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
APPLICATION APPLICATION
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE CROP RATE (inlhr) AMT (inches)
1796
--16,--Z--3,-4,--s1,-s2
AUTRYVILLEALL
WA
0.35
`1
1796
1,16, z, 3, a, s1, SZ S9
ALITRYVILLE ALL
BH
0.35
*1
3197
-15,-O-A,-5,-6,-7,4,
FORK0-7%
WA
0.35
'1
3197
14, 15, 15-P4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 53
FORK 0-7%
BH
0.35
'1
3197
-16
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
0.35
`1
3197
16
UTRYVILLE ALL
BH
0.35
'1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of
nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Pane 5 of 10

1
INARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Your waste utilization plan calls for Bermuda Hay as your primary crop and as the winter
'
annual rye grain. The lagoons now act as two stage lagoons and your sampling shows
that the nitrogen reduction is responding well to the two -stage treatment. You have 180
'
days of storage; however, we recommend that no more than 90 days of storage be used
without spray irrigating. The EMC sixth guidance memo (revision two) recommends that
spray irrigation not be applied to winter annuals or rye over -seeding during December or
'
January. You may spray during that time but are encouraged to control your lagoon
capacity not to require spraying during that time except during extreme conditions. Your
lagoon levels should be at their lowest by the end of November.
1
If you spray irrigate during December and January, you must harvest all winter annuals
by the time they head or by April 7. It must receive an additional harvest by the time the
'
canopy reaches 12 to 15 inches high.
Your facility produces 12,960 pounds of P.A.N. per year plus 2,640 pounds of P.A.N.
'
from sludge per year for a total of 15,600 pounds. The commitment you have made to
providing permanent pasture allows you the maximum nitrogen uptake and with over -
seeding the ability to spray year around if needed. Your actual sampling will produce
'
lower nitrogen amounts than used in this plan that may allow some of your pasture not to
require over -seeding. The nitrogen amount in the sludge may offset the reduction in the
second stage liquid. It is our recommendation that you slurry your sludge and try to
'
reduce it to below one foot depth and apply at agronomic rates annually. You will need
to over -seed 100% of your pasture until sludge has been stabilized before considering not
1
over -seeding any pastureland.

1
LAGOON VOLUME COMPUTATIONS
The owner furnished us with data performed by the N.C.S.W.C. concerning surveyed and
computed volumes. We used their data and the prismoidal formula to compute and verify
the volumes of the four lagoons. The total volume for each lagoon has been computed to
the one -foot freeboard elevation.
Lagoons one and four are the primary receiving lagoons from the floors. Lagoon four
gravity overflows in lagoon three and from there into lagoon two by a submerged gravity
pipe. Lagoon one could flow either/or to lagoons two and three. We requested Neuhoff
Farms to dump only into lagoon three from lagoon one and leave lagoon two to function
as a third stage to lagoons one and four. Lagoons one and four are above lagoon three
and are not static rather in and overflow situation. Lagoons three and two are static. All
the lagoons meet both the volume and depth requirements to operate as a lagoon. We
have chosen to consider all four lagoons acting together as a unit. Lagoons one and four
receive the waste from 3,000 sows with the ability to function properly as lagoons to
accommodate 1,612 sows. This requires lagoons two and three accommodate the
remaining 1,915 sows. Lagoons one and four acting as waste holding and pre-treatment
ponds can accommodate the required 1,299,000 cubic feet of DTV and still have a
freeboard if over twelve inches; 3,000 heads x 433 pounds/head = 1,299,000 lbs.
SSSLW. This leaves ponds two and three to accommodate the temporary storage, 25-
year storm, excess rainfall, heavy water, and freeboard, which they do handle.
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
-Gun Make and Size
Nelson 150
-Ring Size
1.081,
-Pressure at Gun
70 PSI
-Wetted Diameter
260 feet
-Lane Spacing
180 feet
-Application Rate
0.35 in/hr.
-Effective Radius Inside
90feet
-Travel Speed
3.52 F/M
-Pressure at Reel
102.4 PSI
-Pressure at Pump
110 PSI
-Arc Pattern
1800
-Flow at Gun 120 GPM
-Hose Length 1050 feet
-Hose 0 Diameter 3 inches
-Wetted Perimeter Reduction for
Outside and End 20%
-Honey wagon is available for covering non -irrigated areas.
-Traveling gun system replaced a solid set system in 1998.

LAGOON VOLUME COMPUTATIONS
1 The owner furnished us with data performed by the N.C.S.W.C. concerning surveyed and
computed volumes. We used their data and the prismoidal formula to compute and verify
the volumes of the four lagoons. The total volume for each lagoon has been computed to
the one -foot freeboard elevation.
Lagoons one and four are the primary receiving lagoons from the floors. Lagoon four
gravity overflows in lagoon three and from there into lagoon two by a submerged gravity
pipe. Lagoon one could flow either/or to lagoons two and three. We requested Neuhoff
Farms to dump only into lagoon three from lagoon one and leave lagoon two to function
as a third stage to lagoons one and four. Lagoons one and four are above lagoon three
and are not static rather in and overflow situation. Lagoons three and two are static. All
the lagoons meet both the volume and depth requirements to operate as a lagoon. We
.� have chosen to consider all four lagoons acting together as a unit. Lagoons one and four
receive the waste from 3,000 sows with the ability to function properly as lagoons to
accommodate 1,612 sows. This requires lagoons two and three accommodate the
remaining 1,915 sows. Lagoons one and four acting as waste holding and pre-treatment
ponds can accommodate the required 1,299,000 cubic feet of DTV and still have a
( freeboard if over twelve inches; 3,000 heads x 433 pounds/head = 1,299,000 lbs.
SSSLW. This leaves ponds two and three to accommodate the temporary storage, 25-
year storm, excess rainfall, heavy water, and freeboard, which they do handle.
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
-Gun Make and Size
Nelson 100
-Ring Size
0.77
-Pressure at Gun
70 PSI
-Wetted Diameter
250 feet
� -Lane Spacing
180 feet
-Application Rate
0.35 in/hr.
-Effective Radius Inside
90feet
-Travel Speed
1.12 F/M
-Pressure at Reel
102.4 PSI
-Pressure at Pump
110 PSI
-Arc Pattern
3300
-Flow at Gun
105 GPM
-Hose Length
1050 feet
-Hose 0 Diameter
3 inches
-Wetted Perimeter Reduction for
Outside and End
20%
-Honey wagon is available for covering non -irrigated
areas.
-Traveling gun system replaced a solid set system in 1998.

' DRAINAGE at WELDING and STIES
' -Surface drainage has been directed away from the lagoons.
-Outer dike walls have been re -worked, debris removed, and slopes stabilized.
1
1
11

' PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
' conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of Water Quality for every
' day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a
copy of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing
' him/her the use of the land for waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
tmethod of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
' crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for
other nutrients.
'. 4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff
' leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to 'Buffers" required by DEM. (See
FOTG Stantard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
' 5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
' 6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a
' season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the NRCS
Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.)
1
1
*7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and to provide uniformity of application.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with
a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop on bare soil.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
fho ni ifor nearirnofor of fho lanrl area nnfn which %arocfo is onnliorl fmm a lannnn fhaf is a
Pans 7 of 10

' component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other that an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste
' other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied
closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
' 13. Animal Waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landownwer.
' 14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right - of ways.
' 15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying., Animal waste may be applied to prior converted croplands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist'.
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the application causes no runoff or
drift from the site.
' *16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
' *17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
' provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon
' berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or
discharge.
' *18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
*19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
' 20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for
direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied as a preemergence with no other applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
' 21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark
' the maximum storage volume fpr waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -
determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted
ParaRofV)

11
1
for optimum crop production amd maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina Department of
Agriculture regulations.
* Liquid Systems
Pam 4of10

NAME OF FARM: A.G. Center
1
1
OWNER 1 MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance precedures estalished in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the
farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and/or storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new
utilization plan and a new certification to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are
stocked.
I (we) understand that I must own or have acces to equipment, primarily irrigation
equipment, to land apply the animal waste described in this waste utilization plan. This
equipment must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs
from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also certify that the waste will be applied
on the land according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: Ne�uhloff Farms
SIGNATURE: &.L N• 0,{ji , � DATE: J r/� 2-,99
NAME OF MANGER (if different from owner):�l�i Fib !2Yr5-r1rA 1
please print
SIGNATURE: `�"' '`'J DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: R.S. Jarvis
AFFILIATION: JARVIS ASSOCIATES, P.A.
ADDRESS (AGENCY): 130 EAST SECOND STREET
WASHINGTON, NC 27889
2) 9 7794
��AT
SIGNATURE: E.
CARS
a SEAL $
6242
"--.;°yam^•. *$ MUva••.•���•,
Panty In of 10

1
1
JARVIS ASSOCIATES, P.A.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS - FIANNERS - SURVEYORS
130 EAST SECOND STREET - WASHINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 27889
TELEPHONE [phone] / FAX [phone]
NEUHOFF FARMS
ONSLOW COUNTY
ADVANCED GENETICS
Please input the following data:
1). Number of test days = 180
2). Pond Surface Area (fl) = 343004
3)_ Pond Volume w/19" Freebd.= 2,572,878
4). County's Avg. Annual
Rainfall (inche, — 9.08
5). Operation Type Number = 3
1. Weanling-to Feeder
2. Feeder -to Finish
3. Farrow -to Weanling
4. Farrow -to Feeder
5. Farrow -to Finish
Explanation of Formulas Used
Design Treatment Volume - DTV
Liquid Volume - LV
Sludge Volume - SLV
Storage Volume - STV
' DTV(1 yr.) = LV + SLV
LV(1 yr.) = 1.0 f'(#SSSLW)
' Let N = #SSSLW
SLV(1 yr.) = 0.08 ft3(N)
"Design Sludge for 8 years min.**
' i.e. SLV = 0.64(N)
Total Volume (TV) = LV + SLV + STV
STV = N(0.0013 ft'/day)(#days) + RFE + 25yr
RFE = Rainfall excess above the evaporation
rate
RFE = County Avg. Rainfall(Pond Area)/12
25 yr = 25 year rainfall
25 yr = 7.5"(Pond Area)112
Q = Pond Volume W/ 19" Freeboard
Q = LV + SLV + STV + RFE + 25 yr
Test for 180 Days
' Pounds of Steady State Standing Live Weight=1,527,628
Maximum Number of Units per Year = 3,528
' Optimum Conditions PITS 1-4

1
1
1
11
1
1
JARVIS ASSOCIATES, P.A.
CONSULTING FUNGUMERS - PLIERS - SURVEYORS
130 EAST SECOND STREET - WASHINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 27989
TELEPHONE [phone] / FAX [phone]-
NEUHOFF FARMS
ONSLOW COUNTY
ADVANCED GENETICS
Please input the following data:
1). Number of test days = ISO
2). Pond Surface Area (ft2) = 141,252
3}. Pond Volume w/19" Freebd.= 996,845
4). County's Avg. Annual
Rainfall (inches = 9.09
5). Operation Type Number = 3
1. Weanling-to Feeder
2_ Feeder -to Finish
3. Farrow -to Weanling
4. Farrow -to Feeder
5. Farrow -to Finish
EMjaoa_tion of Formulas Used
Design Treatment Volume - DTV
Liquid Volume - LV
Sludge Volume - SLV
Storage Volume - STV
DTV(1 yr.) = LV + SLV
LV(1 yr.) 1.0 ft (#SSSLW)
Let N = #SSSLW
SLV(1 yr.) = 0.08 ft'(N)
**Design Sludge for S years min.**
i.e. SLV = 0.64(N)
Total Volume (TV) = LV + SLV + STV
STV = N(0.0013 ft3/day)(#days) + RFE + 25yr
RFE = Rainfall excess above the evaporation
rate
RFE = County Avg. Rainfall(Pond Area)/12
25 yr = 25 year rainfall
25 yr = 7.5"(Pond Area)112
Q = Pond Volume WI 19" Freeboard
Q = LV + SLV + STV + RFE + 25 yr
Test for 180 D.
' Pounds of Steady State Standing -Live Weight = 583,466
Maximum Number of Units per Year = 1,347
' Optimum Conditions PIT I

'
JARVIS ASSOCIATES, P.A.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS
'
130 EAST SECOND STREET - WASH NGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 27889
TELEPHONE [phone] / FAX (9 t 9) 974-7795
NEUHOFF FARMS
'
ONSLOW COUNTY
ADVANCED GENETICS
'
Please input the -following data:
'
1).
2).
Number of test days = 180 5). Operation Type Number = 3
Pond Surface Area (ft) = 67,942 1. Weanling-to Feeder
3).
Pond Volume w/19" Freebd.= 524,273 2. Feeder -to Finish
4).
County's Avg. Annual 3. Farrow -to Weanling
'
—
Rainfall (inches 9.09 4. Farrow -to Feeder
5. Farrow -to Finish
'
Explanation of Formulas Used
' Design Treatment Volume - DTV
Liquid Volume - LV
' Sludge Volume - SLV
Storage Volume - STV
' DTV(1 yr.) = LV + SLV
LV(1 yr.) = 1.0 ft3(#SSSLW)
' Let N = #SSSLW
SLV(1 yr.) = 0.08 W(N)
**Design Sludge.for 8 years min.**
' i.e. SLV = 0.64(N)
Total Volume (TV) = LV + SLV k STV
1
STV = N(0.0013 f /day)(#days) + RFE + 25yr
RFE = Rainfall excess above the evaporation
rate
RFE = County Avg. Rainfall(Pond Area)/12
25 yr = 25 year rainfall
25 yr = 7.5"(Pond Area)/12
Q = Pond Volume W/ 19" Freeboard
Q = LV + SLV + STV + RFE + 25 yr
Test for 180 Dals
' Pounds of Steady State Standing. Live Weight = 3 13,246
Maximum Number of Units per Year = 723
' OPTRvIUM CONDITIONS PIT 2
1

JARVIS ASSOCIATES, P.A.
.
'
CONSULTING ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS
130 EAST SECOND STREET - WASHINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 27889
TELEPHONE [phone] / FAX [phone]
1
NEUHOFF FARMS
ONSLOW COUNTY
ADVANCED GENETICS
'
Please input the Mlowin data:
P g
1).
Number of test days = 180 - 5). Operation Type Number = 3
'
2).
Pond Surface Area (ft) = 100,600 1. Weanling-to Feeder
3).
Pond Volume w/19" Freebd = 848,339 2. Feeder -to Finish
'
4).
County's Avg. Annual 3. Farrow-to,Weanling
—
Rainfall (inches 9.09 4. Farrow -to Feeder
5. Farrow -to Finish
Explanation of Formulas Used
1 Design Treatment Volume - DTV
Liquid Volume - LV
' Sludge Volume - SLV
Storage Volume - STV
' DTV(1 yr.) = LV + SLV
LV(1 yr.) = 1.0 ft3(#SSSLW)
' Let N = #SSSLW
SLV(1 yr.) = 0.08 fP(N)
**Design Sludge for 8 years min."
' i.e. SLV = 0.64(N)
Total Volume (TV) = LV + SLV + STV
STV = N(0.0013 ft3/day)(#days) + RFE + 25yr
RFE = Rainfall excess above the evaporation
rate
RFE = County Avg. Rainfall(Pond Area)/12
25 yr = 25 year rainfall
25 yr = 7.5"(Pond Area)112
Q = Pond Volume W/ 19" Freeboard
Q = LV + SLV + STV + RFE + 25 yr
Test for 180 D_ aYs
' Pounds of Steady State Standing Live Weight = 516,262
Maximum Number of Units per Year = 1,192
' OPT2%4UM CONDITIONS PIT 3

1
JARVIS ASSOCIATES, P.A.
'
CONSUL NG ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS
130 EAST SECOND STREET - WASHINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 27899
TELEPHONE [phone] / FAX [phone]
1
NEUHOFF FARMS
1
ONSLOW COUNTY
ADVANCED GENETICS
1
Please input the following data:
'
1).
2).
Number of test days = 180 5). Operation Type Number = 3
Pond Surface Area (ft) = 33,200 1. Weanling-to Feeder
3).
Pond Volume w/19" Freebd.= 203,422 2. Feeder -to Finish
1
4).
County's Avg. Annual 3. Farrow -to Weanling
Rainfall (inches. — 9.08 4. Farrow -to Feeder
5. Farrow -to Finish
1
a Ex lanat" n Formulas Used
p IO �orQ!
1 Design Treatment Volume - DTV
Liquid Volume - LV
1 Sludge Volume - SLV
Storage Volume - STV
DTV(1 yr.) = LV + SLV STV = N(0.0013 ft /day)(#days) + RFE + 25yr
LV(1 yr.) = 1.0 ft (#SSSLW) RFE = Rainfall excess above the evaporation
1 Let N = #SSSLW rate
SLV(1 yr.) = 0.08 W(N) RFE =.County Avg. Rainfall(Pond Area)/12
**Design Sludge for 8 years min.** 25 yr = 25 year rainfall
' i.e. SLV = 0.64(IV) 25 yr = 7.5"(Pond Area)/12
Total Volume (TV) = LV + SLV + STV Q = Pond Volume WI 19" Freeboard
' Q = LV + SLV + STV + RFE + 25 yr
Test for 180 Days
1 Pounds of Steady State Standing.Live Weight=114,666
Maximum Number of Units per Year = 265
1 OPT]MUM CONDITIONS PIT 4 i
C
i

Pressure Pipe Analysis & Design
Circular Pipe
Worksheet Name: NEUHOFF FARMS AG
Comment: REEL TO NOZZLE COMPUTATIONS
Solve For Pressure @ I
Given Input Data:
Elevation @ 1.....
100.00
ft
Elevation @ .....
Pressure @ 2
1.00
70
70.00
ft
psis
......
1�
Discharge.........
105.00
gpm
Diameter..........
3.00
in
—Length............
1100.00
ft
Hazen-Williams-C..
100.00
Computed Results:
Pressure @ I......
102.40
psiT�
Velocity..........
4.77
fps
Headloss..........
59.74
ft.
Energy Grade @ 1..
336.58
ft
Energy Grade @ 2..
276-.84
ft
Friction Slope....
54.306
ft/1000
ft
Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.42 (c) 1991
Haestad Methods, Inc.:* 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708
9

1
u
Pressure Pipe Analysis & Design
Circular Pipe
Worksheet Name: NEUHOFF FARMS AG
Comment: PUMP TO FURTHEREST. HYDRANT
Solve For Pressure @ 1
Given Input Data:
Elevation @ 1..... 90.00 ft
Elevation @ 2..... 100.00 ft
Pressure @ 2...... 102.40 psi
Discharge......... 105.00 gpm
Diameter.......... 6.00 in
Length ..... ....... 4600.00 ft
Hazen -Williams C.. 100.00
Computed Results:
Pressure @ 1...... 110.44. psi
Velocity.......... 1.19 fps
Headloss.......... .8.54 ft
Energy Grade @ 1.. 344.80 ft
Energy Grade @ 2.. 336.26 ft
Friction Slope.... 1,857 ft/1000 ft
��Lo MMe:wv / /O 'ems c MA-X
SST. ALL,
1 �A� A Ftt:�Z;ric&Al
1
�l
Ff7A.Maa
Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.42 (c) 1991
Haestad Methods, Inc.:* 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Pressure Pipe Analysis & Design
Circular Pipe
Worksheet Name: NEUHOFF FARMS
AG
Comment: PUMP TO CLOSEST HYDRANT
Solve For Pressure @ 1
Given Input Data:
Elevation @ 1.....
90.00
ft
Elevation @ 2.....
100.00
ft
/Z- 454r=7L.
Pressure @ 2......
102.40
psi
Discharge.........
105.00
gpm
Diameter..........
6.00
in
Length............
850.00
ft
Hazen -Williams C...
100.00
Computed Results:
�vl
Pressure @ I......
107.42
psi
Velocity..........
1.19
fps
Headloss...........
1.58
ft
Energy Grade @ 1..
337.84
ft
Energy Grade @ 2..
336.26
ft
Friction Slope....
1.857 ftj1000 ft
Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.42 (c) 1991
Haestad Methods, Inc..* 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708
0

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN d
»ONE MS
EM ERGENCYNT"AG NTSY -
SWCD Z c� - RECEIVED
MRCS cr WAYEP nU-A1LEfi(sEU--nOv
JUN 2 3 2000
This plan wM be fmpIumented & theew=that wastes: ffom:your operation arc leakutg,
overaowin&orrunntngoffsite Yoashoul& not wait untffwastes reacirszufaccafaters:�arge Permitting
leave your property to considertharyou: have a-ptoblem_Yomshould- make- every effort to
ensumthat.this does nothappem This: plan. should bcFostedinartaccessiblelocanoafor
all employees at the facility. The following ate some action Bars you shoal-& take_
1. Stop the release of wastes_ Depending.onr the shoat =this may- ormay not be
possible: SugQesstedresponses to- somegassibleMblems-amUmted.below.-
A_ Lagoorroverflow-possible solutions a =
a< Add soil to bernrto fncr=e:ekvaffa :ofda=
b:. Pump wastes m- fields. at amacceptableate-
c Stop all flows to the Iagaa= i mted1aWLy-
dl. Call- a pumping contractor_
e. Make sure no. surfacewaterEs. ente ring lago om.
B: Runoff fmm wasteapglicatloix ffcU-actions: k ciW=
a- 11n medaatelTswg waste application-
b.. Create a mWom y divesiom for eontmm waste
c- incorporamwaste-ta rech=ranoM
d_ Evaluate and a li.infnate the m mx(s-) -tom cartes& tl= runoff.
e. -Evaluate the Vpiimffoarates: forthe fields.wb=ruuoffoccun-ed:
C:. LeaU ge from the waste -pipes and sprin i -action include_
a_ Stop tccycte: pump
b_ Stag irrigation pump.
c - Qosevalves to d m;nate furdierdisrh
d Repafr aff reaks- prior to restartingpumps-
D: T ¢at a�oe front tTush. sys=s-„houses,. solid separators action include*
a_ Stop recyci-c pump
b. Stop irrigadorrpump..
d" Makc sure no- siphon occur_
& Stop all' flows iv tics houserffush systems, or solid separators
L December 18,.1996

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.y
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Oft= this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks- posj�l�acWn
: mac'► : --`
y �
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away fiom the embaaknent to catch all seepage,
put inasubmersibie pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill
holes. and compact with a clay type soiL
c Have &professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possilalm
2 Assess the extent ofthe spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c Any damage noted,. such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
E Could a_ future rain event cause the spill to -reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells- in. danger (eitheron- or off of the property)?
b. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies-
a- Duringnormal business hours; call yourDWQ(Division ofWaterQuality)
regional office; Phone- - - After hours, emergency number. 919 733-3942.
Yburphone call should include: your -name,, facility,,
elephone number, the details
of the: incident from. item 2 above, the exact location ofthe facility, the Iocation or
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions The corrective
measures that have been under takes, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters. cal local EMS Phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Deparrmcat
d. Contact CES-, phone number - - local SW® office phone number
and local NRCS office for adviceltechnical assistance phone number - -
4: If none ofthe above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and' explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair ofproblem.to minimize off -site
damage.
a_ Contractors Name:_yz! UY r d,�4•�'
b. Contractors Address: Ji l S? c' N c 1-6 y IN i� _ C. 9 l T K! Q 5 c:
c Contractors Phone: .25J Z --2 `? `i 2
2 December 1 S, 1996

6: Contact the technical specialistwho certified the lagoon (NRCSS,.Consulting
Engineer, etc.) L
a. Name:
b. Phone: - -
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
6/za10a
3 December 18, 1996

I
Swine Farm Waste Mana0ement Odor Control Checklist
BMPa to Minimize Odor
Farmstead 4 Swine production f] . Vegetailve or wooded buffers;
O K mmended best management practices;
B�aood Judgment and common sense
Floor surfaces • Wet manure -covered lloors (YSi tted floor's;
: Waterers located over slotted Floors;
❑ Feeders at high end of solid Floors;
❑ Scrape manure buildup from floors;
❑ Underfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits • Urine; FU�Frequent manure removal by flush, pit recharge,
a Partial microbial decomposition or scrape;
Cl U3t derfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fans • Volatile gases; ;;Wolclent
�maintenance;
Dust air movement
Indoor surfaces • Vust R- Washdown between groups of animals;
❑ Feed additives;
❑ Feeder covers;
❑ Feed delivery downspout extenders to feeder
covers
Flush tanks • Agitation of recycled lagoon ❑ Flush tank covers;
liquid while tanks are filling ❑ Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Flush alleys + Agitation during wastewater ❑ Underfloor flush with underfloor ventilation
conveyance
Pit recharge points • Agitation of recycled lagoon ❑ Extend recharge lines to near bottom of pits
liquid while pits are filling with anti -siphon vents
Lift stations a Agitation during sump tank ❑ Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
outside drain collection • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Box covers a
or junction boxes conveyance t+
o O .
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 3

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Od6r Site Specific Practices
End of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Extend dischaigc point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces
• Volatile gas emissi
• Biological mixing;
• Agitation
lagoon liquid capacity;
❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures;
0 Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
0 Minimum agitation when.pumping;
Cl Mechanical aeration;
❑ "en biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation; QY irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
nozzles • Wind drib Cl Minimum recommended operating pressure;
0 Plump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
111 Pump from second -stage lagoon
Storage tank or basin • Partial microbial decomposition; 0 Bottom or midlevel loading;
surface . Mixing while filling; 0 Tank covers;
• Agitation when emptying ❑ Basin surface mats of solids;
0
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface •
Partial microbial decomposition;
❑
Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
•
Mixing while filling;
level;
•
Agitation when emptying
CI
Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge •
Agitation when spreading;
f]
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets •
Volatile gas emissions
❑
Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
0
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovet•ed ttianure, +
Volatile gas emissions while
CI
Sail injection orslurrylsludges
slurry or sludge on field
drying
0
Soil Incorporation within 48 lirs.;
surfaces
O
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying; C
Cl Pr9ven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition P"Proper disposition ofcarcasses Z
Dead animal disposal • Carcass decomposition 17 Complete covering or carcasses in burial pits;
pits 0 Proper locationlconsituction of disposal pits
Incinerators + Incomplete.. combustion n Secondary stack burners No
AMQI- - November 11, 1996, Page 4 C-
4

Source Cause . / BMPs io Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Standing water aiound + Improper drainage; prade and landscape such that water drains
facilities . Microbial decomposition of away frotrt facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto • Poorly maintained access roads Farm access road maintenance
public roads from farm
access
Additional Information:
Available From:
Swine Manure Management; 0200 Rule/BMP Packet
NCSIJ, County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU - BAE
' Swind Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge - Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 128-88
NCSU - BAE
Swine Production Facility Mant[rd Management: Underfloor Flush : Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129-88
NCSU-BAR
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
NCSU - BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU - BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33
NCSU - Swine Extension
13nvir'ohmerital Assurance Program ; NPPC Manual
NC Pork Producers Assoc
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force
NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Florida Cooperative Extension
N
o0
AMOC -November 11, 1996, Page S

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Flush Gutters a Accumulation of solids CY Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed.
0 Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
,4ischarge
Lagoons and Pits • Crusted Solids 9 Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than G -
B inches over more tlran 30% of surface.
Excessive Vegetative • Decaying vegetation Maintain vegetative control along banks of
Growth lagoons and other Impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Feeders r Feed Spillage O Design, operaie and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minititlze the
accumulation of decaying waslage.
Cl Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter).,
of feed residues 0
C;
AMIr November 11, 1996, Page I
Reduce moisture accumulation within and
around immediate perimeter of feed storage
areas by insuring drainage away from site
and/or providing adequate containment (e.g.,
covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high
moisture grain products).
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as
needed.
Site

Source Cause
Animal Holding Areas a Accumulations of animal wastes 0
and feed wastage
G
Dry Manure Handling + Accumulations of animal wastes p
Systems
Ci
13MPs to Control Insects, Site Specific Practices
Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal. .
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed)..
Remove spillage on a routine basis (c.g., 7 - i0
day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
rhanure handling areas as needed.
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University,
Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, Page 2

w'
Mo> taffty Methods
(check which method(s) are -being implemented) Q/oa
0: Burial three feet beneath. the surface of the ground within 24 hours. after
knowledge of the -death. The burial must be at least 300 feet: from. any, flowing_'
stream orpublic .body ofwater_
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G:S: I06-T68iT
t� Complete incineration
Q Inthe case of dead, poultry only, placing in a disposal, pit of a: sizeand design.
approved by the Department of Agriculture
❑= Any method: which in the professional" opinion of the- State Veterinarian would.
make possible; the, salvage ofpart.of a, dead aniinar's: value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December. 18,.1996

State of North Carolina
Department.of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
February 15, 2000
Neuhoff Farms Inc
Neuhoff Farms Inc (AG)
1706 Woodwind Drive
Greenville NC 27856
Attn: James H. Neuhoff Jr.
ffl1 V �_K
• •
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS670001
Additional Information Request
Neuhoff Farms Inc (AG)
Animal Waste Operation
Onslow County
Dear James H. Neuhoff Jr.:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by March 16, 2000:
1. Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) incorporates current guidance allowing for up to 100 pounds of
nitrogen per acre to be applied to small grain overseed under strict management practices. As mentioned in
the guidance memo (enclosed) the last application to bermuda must he prior to August 31. The application
of waste to the small grain must be done in split applications of 50 pounds nitrogen applied between
September 15 and October 30 and another 50 pounds nitrogen applied between February and March.
Currently your WUP lists the application window for Bermuda as April through September and the
application window for small grain as September through April. These application windows should be
revised to to reflect the current guidance for application to small grain overseed at increased amounts.
2. Best Management Practices (BMPs) that are to he implemented at this facility should be identified (check
the appropriate BMPs) on the Mortality Management Checklist (enclosed).
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter, must be
submitted on or before March 16, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
SueHornewood `
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699:1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
9l''.1 * 1=1lil�
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT RE UESTED
Attn: James H. Neuhoff Jr.
Neuhoff Farms Inc
1706 Woodwind Drive
Greenville NC 27856
A/ • • 2
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS670001
Additional Information Request
Neuhoff Farms Inc (AG)
Animal Waste Operation
Onslow County
Dear James H. Neuhoff Jr.:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. A request for additional information was sent on February 15,
2000 and to date this information has not been received. Please address the following by June 30, 2000:
Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) incorporates current guidance allowing for up to 100 pounds of
nitrogen per acre to be applied to small grain overseed under strict management practices. As mentioned in
the guidance memo (enclosed) the last application to bermuda must be prior to August 31. The application
of waste to the small grain must be done in split applications of 50 pounds nitrogen applied between
September 15 and October 30 and another 50 pounds nitrogen applied between February and March.
Currently your WUP lists the application window for Bermuda as April through September and the
application window for small grain as September through April. These application windows should be
revised to to reflect the current guidance for application to small grain overseed at increased amounts.
2. Best Management Practices (BMPs) that are to be implemented at this facility should be identified (check
the appropriate BMPs) on the Mortality Management Checklist (enclosed).
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter, must be
submitted on or before June 30, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
ince ly,
�eHomewood
\
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Neuhoff Farms Inc
Neuhoff Farms Inc (AG)
1706 Woodwind Drive
Greenville NC 27856
Farm P;umber: 67 - 1
Dear Neuhoff Farms Inc:
wa 15DENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 15, 1999
You are hereby notified that Neuhoff Farms Inc (AG), in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for
coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has si 60 da s to
submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws
(Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified
by the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Susan Cauley at [phone] extension 546 or Brian
Wrenn with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
c
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Wilmington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resourcgeo Sp ON
Division of Water Quality or,Ft�� �
Non -Discharge Pernut Application Form 0
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operatio�>r>�$
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Neuhoff Farms Inc (AG)
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Neuhoff Farms Inc
1.3 Mailing address: 1706 Woodwind Drive
City, State: Greenville NC Zip: 27856
Telephone Number (include area code): 919-756-2421
1.4 County where facility is located:
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): 402 Costor Rd. - SR 1225
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): Jimmy Neuhoff
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Neuhoff Farms, Inc.
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/60
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 67 (county number); 1 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Swine operation
Farrow to Wean
3000- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; [::]no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
TyW of Swine No. of Animals TyVS of Poultry No. of Animals Tie of Cattle No. of Animals
• Wean to Feeder • Layer • Dairy
Feeder to Finish • Non -Layer • Beef
• Farrow to Wean (# sow) • Turkey
• Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
• Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 67 -1

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 65 -, Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 10
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRC Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
E or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? l q i o v&e—AA4eC rl#km
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? S
3- REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application held.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan,
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoontstorage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
Applicants Initials
1+ 1
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 67 - 1

Facility Number: 67 - 1
Facility Name: Neuhoff Farms Inc (AG)
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I, ti.lg'/_ PS X• /V eAl�, TV. (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for _. ffio�f In, f--q "',"A �r,.r-__ (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not co eted and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to incomplete.
1 !/Signature Date % Z/9 S
5. MANAGER'S CCERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for i„ . T /VetJ k4o FZ Fi¢+? rrlS /"-(Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomple,4 A
Signature
®i1ff' ,M- dm
Date 9F
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 67 - 1

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (I/98)
Asheville Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Woodfin Plane
AsbevWc, NC 28801
{-szgj 251-6208
Fax (e7%) 251-6452
Avery Macon
Buncombe Madison
Burke McDowell
Caldwell Mitcbeil
Cbervkee Polk
Clay Rutherford
Graham Swain
Haywood Transylvania
Heodesson Yancey
Jackson
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson Moore
Blades Richmond
Cumberland Robeson
Harnett Sampson
Hoke Scotlaad
Montgomery
V%umon-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
585 Waughtown Steer
Winston-Salear, NC 27107
(33Q 77I4600
Fax (33b) 771-4631
Alamance Rockingham
Alleghany Randolph
Ashe stokes
Caswe;l Surry
Davidson Watauga
Davie Wilkes
Fmw& Yadkin
Guilford
Washington Regional WQ Supervisory
943 Washington Squa:e Mall
Washington, NC 27989
(2S) 94 -6491
Fax [phone]
Beaufort - Jones = "
Bertie Lenoir
Chowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotank
Curriawh
Perquimans
Dare
Pitt .
Gates
Tjnell
Greene
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alexander Lincoln
Cabarms Mecklenburg
Catawba Rowan
Cleveland Stanly
Gaston Union
Iredell
Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
38W Banc Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27611
(919) 5714700
Fax [phone]
Cbatham - Nash - -
Durham Northampton -
Fdgecombe Orange
Franklin Person
Granville Vance
Halifax Wake
Jobnstm Warren
Lee Wilson
Wilmington Regina. WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 29405-3945
[phone]
Fax [phone]U04
Bnmswick New Hanover
Ctrtrtet - Onslow
Coltunbus Paadm
Duplin
FORM: AWO-G-E 512&98 Page 4 of 4

Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
Please true ar print all information that does not require a siirnaturer
General Mformation:
Name of Farm:_
Owner(s) Name:.
Mailing Address:
AN'T"
(please- Ox... a .one
� r fyN
1 Facility No: �22� ^ -
,e ed6—Al. C. Z 7
Farm Location: „ County Farm,is located in: Z>U SZ— O 4e1
Latitude and Longitude: 3? �i/ 7 7 �T t�Irltegrator: tFURaV-P '�y�•
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (,Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): Z> LL S 'z--z- . O Dill GL=-5
j o ZT.� oL - 0. 1 Z >/A,fA -Xi� w )41,'j
.d5. -tz. 1 Z?�e)
Operation Desolation:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
O Wean to Feeder
Q. Feeder to Finish
a Farrow to Wean
0 Farrow to Feeder
D Farrow to Finish
a Gilts
ti Boars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
0 Layer
0 Pullets
Orher Type of Livestock-.
Type of Catrie No. of Animas
M Dairy
Z Beef
Number of Animals:
Acreage P,vastanre rot P.ppuc son meq=ea acreage:�---
Number of Lagoons 1 Storage Ponds : Total Capacity:±-� ubic Feet UP)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YTS or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
k�k�R:�F***r%��MkkMM*F*�ki.�*�iwM**a�kkFk#�e4�M#iri,��*,4#k�kielek#***ahk�*M#�Ie*nhkkltle*��h:kN�%k*�hk+F
Owner / Manager Agreement
i (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan :or the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Envirotimenmi Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or froth a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be tun -off from the
application of wimal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Nann-al Resources Conservation Str ice. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation DistdCL I (we) know that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DE-M or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Lando er :i.�o►
Signature:_ Dare: �� 9
Name of Manager(if diifferew ran owner):, EW /RKC-,57; �
Signature: GX �', �1 ��"°"'�''' Date:
AWC ._ August T. 1"7 l

Technical Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an atuutal waste
management plan that meets- or exceeds standards and specificatiens of the Division of Environmental lbiaaagement
(DENT} as specified in 15A NCAC 2H0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the
North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2K(r-17 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-
.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicahie. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are
technically competent.
II. Cerdfication of Design
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
id" l~X!Ein& faciliry lvithQut retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage_ capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
Cl New. expanded or retrofltt d a 'li(SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems. lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of T hnical Specialist (Please Prins): `i .i;: _• �=:�. �,� %S, .
Affiliation SJS.'C?—giL5 'bite`Wfirk Completed: ) Z
Address (Agency): O 6. Z �i!5,7r �Atr*"Vf � ��4 �one N� 9
7717
Si onature- —7
B Land ARtalication Site (V4 } ry ,�
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers);.adequai4land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 4
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: -bate: / 2 �' Z
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior_ Lots
Check the appropriate box :
Fa ' ' with ttt c 'or a SD or WUP or RC '
.�lisv_ o � ten i is ( }
This facility does not conmia any exterior lots.
G Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NR 5:= .'10;j,t-
.� Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Address (Agency):
Signature:w,.�
AWC -- August 1, IM
- - . A2! V
=-.DafeVork Completed:
Phone No.:
Date:
•a).�•1 ����� �-,,7 ins

r:
D). A t lication and Handling, E ui ment
Check dre appropriate box
Exi. tins or x andin f cility with ex- ing w e rcati n e i m n (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing, application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
Q New. expanded. or emoting facility without existing w to application t2uilL ent for spray irrigation, (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be Maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
sl New. expanded. or existing facility without existing. waste application equipment for_]and spreading notating
ray img tin (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan)-
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):��
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address {Agency}: - Pti �i
Signature:._
one i o..
�-- Date:
E) _Odor Control. Insect Control.yiortality ManMement ditd1Eiiaergencv Action Plan (SD.
SI. WUP. RC or D The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checkiist, an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
M
ortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are co and can be imAiemented by t
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): _ .---�
Address (Agency):
r--
�e �e No.:
: 12 - f S
F) Written Notice of New or Expa ding Swine Farm.%�s"g
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expan ia#ms that begin construction after ,June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road. street. or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached -- - `— -" ` ----
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Date:
Name of Manager (if different from o%vner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- august 1. 1997 3

III. Certification of Installation
. A) Collection. Storage, Treatment Installation
Hew. expanded pr retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal- waste storage and treatment strictures. such as but not limited to lagoons :and ponds. have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing faedides without retrofits, no certification is necessa7y.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please
Affiliation ' Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): _ -- Phone vo.:
Signature: Date:
B) Land Ayolication Site (W'P)
Che;;Th:e
ropnate bor
cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal wasie management plan.
0 Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting: the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan bas not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crap is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilizadon plan.
o Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specihed in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interior crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation T'`;rlt�ompleted:
Address (Agency): Fk _ Pfione No.
Signature: 4.; = Date.
This following signature block is one to be used vrhkiw; °40 40 ditional approval in M. B
above has been checked. `'9•:; 1 �
I (we) certify that I (we) leave committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan,
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DE:M.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature• Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):---- - - -- - - -- - -
r'`, Signature:
Date:
AWC -- Auguu 1, 1 "7 4

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
C:
L�
0
Facilitv with exterior lots
llttltods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.
Far facilities without exterior lots, n c fcation is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) Application and Handling Equipment Installation_ (IVVUP or I)
Check the�a�prtate block
W Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
J Aninnal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third parry application and has provided a signed contract: equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Q Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate
storase to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in thp,plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are can as part ?P ilie;plait�: ::J
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): n f��
Address
_Date Work Completed:
Phone No.:
' Date:
The following signature block is only to be used when the box=for conditional approval in III D.
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certificadon. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of -Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and Vlortality lei
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in tI
mortality management system as specified in the Plan h
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Pont): l-.
Address (Agency):.
Signature:
rkftvtr`I;Z>W' ,,�nstalled and are operational. The
►eh,rlsfa�led tt1¢ is o rational.
� e WOrk,.Gompleted:
-,Phone No..
'.'•� r�� Date
AWC -- august 1. 1997
5

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Branch, Compliance Unit
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
C7
•
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Minimal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC -- August 1, 1997 6

RECEIVED �
bVATER
to 15 i999
OpE_RATiQWS__AND MAI( TENAhiGE ELAN -FOR -SWINE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OWNER.:. NEUHUFF FARMS
The purpose of this plan is to provide guidelines for
carrying out the routine operation and maintenance work
needed to keep this swine waste management system
functioning as planned. Routine maintenance adds to beauty,
usefulness, and permanence.
A: Wast_Tre ment a q n
The routine maintenance of the lagoon involves the
foliowing:
1: Maintenance of a vegetation cover on the dike top
and side slopes: KY_ TaII Fescue (100 Ibs/ac% or
Common Bermuda C2S lbslac) is being established on
these areas. Beginning in 1990 and each year and
thereafter, the dike should be fertilized with 800
pounds of 10-10-10 per acre to maintain a vigorous
stand.
2: Control of brush and trees on the dine. This may
be done by mowing, spraying, or chopping, or a
combination of all three. This will need to be done
at least once each year and possibly twice in years
favorable to heavy growth of vegetation.
Maintenance inspections of the lagoon should be made
during the initial filling of the lagoon and at least
annually. Items to Lie checked should include, as a
minimum, the following:
1: Waste Inlet Pipes, Overflow Pipes
a: coed i t i crn of pipes
(1) separation of joints
(2) cracks or breaks
2: Pool Area
a: undesirable vegetative growth
b: floating or lodged debris

J
4
3: Embankment
a: settlement, cracking or ",jug" holes
b: side slope stability — slunips or bulges
c: erosion
d: rodent damage
4: Transfer Pump
Bs_ Maw gemer�t and,_ I„gnd a I i cat i on oL waste nutr i ents
Pumping of waste shall be on 180 day cycle. Permanent
storage shall not be pumped below E feet < 7' total
depth) in order to insure anaerobic action. Elev. 49.3
Ground cond;}ions need to be evaluated prior to
beginning irrigation. Waste should not be applied to
Either saturated soils or to lands on which the soil
surface is frozen, since waste may run off to
subsurface drainage system. Wind conditions should be
observed to avoid drift and odor problems. Subsurface
outlets and downstream drainage should be constantly
monitored.
Maximum application rates should consider the intake
capability of the particular soils that the waste is
applied on. For application on Craven, Lenoir, Bladen
soils, the maximum application rate is .35 inches per
hour with cover and .30 inches per hour mare.
Application rate an corer is 2.95 inches and on wheat is
1.9 inches.
The waste material should be analyzed every year to
determine its nutrient content. A soil test of the
area of application should be made annually to insure
the waste is applied as reasonably and practically
possible to recommended rates.

RECEIVED
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAW-Siggg
PHONE NUMBERS
�ftv*ft
DWQ .- JA i.G— n ■ r r n Awc 91 a ,393 39dd
EMERGENCY MXNAGEMENT SYSTEM. �lv 3y7_1Vz7d
SWCD: q!o L}5Sy�7Z
NRCS: S,ryf5F7z
} 11 No
{j, t-r y TySo�
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off
site. You should not w;it until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem.
You should make every effort to ensure that this does not
happen. This plan_ should bg Posted in an accessible
Joe tion for all eMRloyees at the facilit y_ The following
are some action itemE you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow —possible solutions are:
a.
Add
soil to berm to increase
elevation of dare.
b.
Pump
wastes to fields at an
acceptable rate..
C.
stop
all flows to the 'Lagoon
immediately.
d.
Call
a pumping contractor.
e.
Make
sure no surface water is
entering lagoon.
8: Runoff from waste application field —actions
include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
C. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that
caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields
where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers —action
include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.

d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from.flush systems, houses, solid
separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or
solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
$: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often
this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks -
possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to
lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap
or remove animals and fill holes and compact
with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of
the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon as
possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what
duration?
C. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish
kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface
waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach
surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off
of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DwQ
(Division of Water Quality) regional office; Phone
919-946-6481. After hours, emergency number: 919-
733-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility, telephone number, the details of

the incident frOm item 2 above, the exact location
of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions.
The corrective measures that have been under taken
and the seriousness of the s=tuation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters,
call local EMS Phone number 919-830-6345.
C. Instruct FMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 919-757-2801, local. SWCD
office phone number 919-752-2720, and local MRCS
Office for advice technical assistance phone number
919-752-2720.
4s If none of the above works call 911 or the sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask
that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a.
Contractors
Name:
T_W A 7 u 166(
b.
Contractors
Address: I
6�,eAl zps3o
C.
Contractors
-
Phone:_ 2gz
Sx-YL. 3lly-
S: Contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon (MCS, consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name:
b. Phone=.
2
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
ffahoffS l0enplanwSSn1.�K�peen.dc:
Sept 124E

Stolle -cc Cause IIMPs lei Control Insecis Site specific Praclices
Animal I loldiog Areas • Arctmudatimis of animal wastes ❑ Ellinioule law areas Ihal Irap moislure alunb
and fe ed 1VaSIagC fences and olher locations where wasic
accunnilalcs and disitirbailce by animals is
•- luinirnal.
13 Maintain fence rows and filler strips around
animal holding areas lei minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break tip accumulated solids as
aectledj.
D/y himlina l landlilig • Aclumulailmis of aninnil writes n Remove spillage on a roulinu basis (c.g,, 7 - 10
Sysicuns clay hilerval dining summer; I5-30 day imerval
during whiter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
11 Provide for adequale drainage armind manure
stockpiles.
❑ Inspect for and remove or break up accuniiihicd
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles foul
manure handling-areils as needed.
For noire intiirmation r-omacl the Gznper-dive I mciisinn Service, Delnufticni of Entomology, Box 7613. Notlli Carolina Mate I h6vCrsiiy,
Raleigh, Nt , 77695-7613.
s
A M W- Nowiti6er 11. 1996, tithe 2

C. I —
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
—r Snnrcc Cause _ limps lu Canlrul 111 els_^ Sale SlleciCc Pratclices
Yi Idlslt Lihllcrs
+ I .:Ig+dnlds altdl I'ils
It<I;dssivl: vcget:tlivc
( i1d1\�1)d
• Ac4umulallon of solids d' Flush system is designca) and opuraled
sufficiently to remove acenmtdaaed Solids front
Cullers as desigurd.
CI Hcnlnve luidging of accunmlaied solials pI
+ f'I4ls11-d Solids - I--1� 11ll;aaul aill lago( nS, SCllllllg h asins and phs MICIC
pest breeding is apparent to minimize: the
ertasling of solids to a depth of nn MOM than b .
8 indles over more Man 30% of surface.
• Pecaying vecctaiion -- 4-r M.11111111p vegel.Slive Collooi alrwag hanks oil w�
Iagoosis wed otter intltormdotcnts la Prevail
accmnr11:11ion of dfecaying vegetative anauer
idong walces edge on impouodnnenl's perimeter.
taa,.
Accnuluhtlions of feed residncs
A h 111 ' - Nuvel"I" 11. 1996, bilge I
_ I w4'y Sysletlls
14--n sign, ,tln-ratc anal nrtiulaits Ceed--
bookets and arobghs) in ntinitnize llte
accullsuiahon of decaying wnM age.
t —C izrut tqt SIM1.111C nn a routine basis (e.g., i - 10
day h acrval dining stu mucr; I5-30 duy inacaval
4111111g Winter).
n tieahlc:e moistort: accuntllafit>at within ami_----
wr►un11 inutacdiale Itc:l itllcter of Iecd sloragu
urcas by inswilig dhainage:away frolo site
and/or providing adeepMe cunlainnued (e-g.,
t:rlvcrcal bin for In -ewer's gruiu and similar high
Iudtislalra grain protlucIS).
fl Inspect lair and remove or break ail: accau1u11:tte11
solids iu filter Mrips wound feed Sh age us
11cuded.

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
S„Err ce Cause iIMPs to Mlninrice 011m. Site Specific !'rrrctiees
F;urnsle;,rl . swine produclioo Cl Vegelative or wooded buMrs;
f�lt cotnmended best manageEuent pracl ices,
il' Good judgment and common sense
Animal bo,ly surfaces F)irly Euantlre-covered animals C1 my floors
I In„r su, l ,rrs ^� • Wei ur1ulrre-covered floors �^ _ Sloped floors;
n Walerers located over slolled Mots;
0 Feeders al high end of solid floors;
177 Scrape Manure buildup from floors;
n [tnderfloor ventilation for drying
l,fa„uuu cirllecliuu I,ils • thiru:; fr1 heipium mainure rewovul by flush, pil rcchurgc,
• I':Erli;li ulictobiai d,:composilionl n crape;
1-4 I1011crlloor ventilation
VcnEilatinu c.�hausl I•una • V1+L'Uile Eases: M11 1'illl E11iEi111er1arlCC;
15us1 ER E'l ictenl air lnoVemerd
h„I„nr s,rrFr�, _ !)nsl la aSlkElt�tVn betweell grumps of itlti111aIS;
ttr.
C Iced addhives;
t 1 Fceder covers;
(.1 3-cull delivery downspout exrendcrs lu feeder
covers_
�l I�rsh t�,ufs Agittttiun of recycled lagoolt 1771 Flush lank envers;. - - - -
h(plid while Iaukx are filling B E xlend rill lines to near boltom of Tanks with
auli-siltholl vents
1 tar,fr ;,il�ys • rAgilalion during %vaslewaler n I Inderlloor flush Mill undvi-Ilour vemilalion
conveyance
1cc baige pui;tl5 . Agilalinn of recycled lagoon 0 Iixlend recharge lines 11) local. hollunk of pits T �
liquid while pits are filling with onli-sipl;on vents
Litt sta,ti,ma Agitation during sump muk _ ..0 'Suutp lank covers
filling and drawdown
Omsi,ie drain colleclion • Agitation during wastewater fl Box covers
Or juncliuu boles cnuveyalrcu
A&IOf.' - Novetnher 11, 1996, Page I

Qr.
S1lurre Cause RMPs to Miniluku Oflor, Site Specific Praclicta
land of drai,q,ilies al + Agitation during wastewaler C] Extend discharge poial of pipes nit( lenmath
la�noll conveyance lagoon liquid level
h lgns )Ij surfaces • Volatile gas emissions; C7 Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; f] Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agilmiorl n Minimum surface area-lo-volunne folio;
C7 Minimum agitallon when,pumping;
lv�echmnical aeration;
(+�/Proven biological additives
1rripliun splillwer— 11lihli PrC55111e agilalion; Irrigate on dry days Willi little or no wind; -- —
nlo'rtl�s . wiudlhift recolmnended aperaling pressure;
Q`Fuunp irmike near lagoon liquid surface;
GI-11—imp front second -stage lagoon
51nr:16c 1;111k of. basin • P,lrlial nlicrubial decoltpositirnl: n 110140111 or midlevel loathing;
s #.
11 '" ` •
Mixing while tilling;
n
Tank covers;
•
Agltallon when elnplylllg
f1
llasllt snrrace mats of solids;
rl
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Self nli basin surtiece
Partial tuierobial dcelnnposilion;-
Cl
IiXlellll dralllpipe otlttels llltllerltealh liquid -�- --_
+
Mixing Willie filling;
level;
•
Agitation When emptying
CI
Remove settled solids regularly
l immic, slurry t r slpdgc .
Agitation when spreading;
0
Soil injection orslnrry/spathes;
spreader Imilds +
Valalile as cnitissions
>}
f_1
Wash residual mantlre from spreader after use;
f7 Proved biological additives for oKid-imis
i ilcovered nrrnu Volatile gas elnissions tvllile O Soil injection of slurry/sindges
s1111•ry or shodge on tiehd drying C7 Soil incorporalinit wilhin 48 lirs.;
SIR 1"Ices
n Spread in thin nniftoun layers For rapid drying;
El Proven biological additives or oxidants
!)c;1�1 aninr,,ts • Carcass decolnposilioll _ Proper disposiliun of carcasses --- -
Dead animal disposal Carcass decoluposhion n Complele covering of carcasses in burial pits; T r
loin
tncioLlalurs • lncnmplcll:a,ntbust
I h : - Novelubcr 11, 1996, Page 4
1711 Proper local ion/cnnslruclion ordisposal arils
Cl Secondary stack burners

#A
Source Cause I1MPs io Minimize Odor Sile S
Sumiling %Y;tler aromid • Irltpioper drainage; Gr Grade anti landscape suck 11181 water drains
facilitiesa Microbial dccompositioll of away front facilities
organic maller
M mure tracked onto • Poorly maintained Access reads Fang access road maintenance
public roads t'rom then
access
Addilinnal infornialion : _ Available Rom
Swhic Mamire: Management ; 0200 Itule/I1MP Pac[it:1 NCSI1, Counly Exlenslon Center
Swine Nothiction Valm Potential Odnr Sources and Remedies ; FRAU Fact Shect NCSU - HAI,
Swine Production Facilily Manure Management: pit Recharge - Lagoon Trealment ; MAR 129-98 NCSI1- 11AIi
%wine: Noeluclion Fucilhy Maunrc Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment ; EllAt? 129-98 NCSU - 11AF
Lagoon Msign and Managenncut fur Livestock Manure Treulment and Slorage ; rMAP 103-81 NCSU - 11AF
Caiibralicrn of Manure and Wastewater Application L'gtiilmiicnl ; I:FIAE Facl Sheet NCSI I - I I A 1i
Col urollinb C1elors Boni Swine Buildings; P111-33 NCS1I - Swine ExIcusiort
virounie nlal Assnrauce 1'ro6rani ; NI'!'C Manual NC Park Prothicers Assoc
Oplimis file Managing Odor; a report fioin the Swine Odor Task Force NCSU Agri Communications
Mnisance Cnucems in Animal Manure Managenrenl: Odrus and Hies ; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Conperdrve I:x1411siou
Ar
416
AAIC 1f: - November 11, 1996, 1'irgt:5

Nlortality Management Methods
(check which me:hod(s) are being implemented)
J Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within ?= hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from anv flowing
stream or public body of water, r
at3 Rende:ina at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
�! Comolete incine.a€ion
J In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Departmetzt of Apiculture
Anv method which in the prcfessional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of pan of a dead animal's value %vithout endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
A

d
�mal Waste Management Plan Certification RECETVED
(Pie a or Tint all information that does not require a sisnaiur2�WATER ()LfkTySECTION
1X. kin of ..., ate ..::..or...::.Ei ar>ded'..:, lease care ane `..... ...
Ge Non -Disc tUn
Name of Farm: AFagiliW No:
L Y
Owners) Name: h{bne N"lUf -
Mailing Address: l 7ob V400V W190 PP. �eZ?W kIl LL6I C. Z 7R-576
Farm Location: 9 „County Farm,is located in: e>
Latitude and Longitude: ' _�EZ 3 7 / 77* S�2!& Integrator: lA 1:_:EJ 9 O
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (j3e specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): S �. [ �Z • O '�' kf� GES
o -76 La
Onejration Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
• Wean to Feeder
a Feeder to Finish
a Farrow to Wean_.
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Ct Guts
a Boars
^i;_.t%le for
Type of Poultry
❑ Layer
O Pullets
No. of Animals
Type of Carrie
:.1 Dairy
J Beef
No. of Animals
Other Type of livestock- _ Number of Animals:
_ �ir:ai a .'�?�::-_ c..s,;tip �_ -."�ki"� ..."r,�*• -
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. i (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification tb be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or -fmm a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service- The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer. - --- — ----- --------- --- --- -- --- -. -.-
Name of Land
Name of Manager(if
Signature: G
_
Date:_
AWC — august I. 1997

M
Technical Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the Noah Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005. 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management
(DEN) as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) andlor the
North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-
.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD, Si, WUP, RC, 1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are
technically competent.
II. Certification of Desia n
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
Q--'Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
nIS
ci
Nie .v. exnanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of TAkhnical Specialist (P ease Print):"
Affiliation >LOO—qL5 �•
Address (Agency): O Z SJr
Signature: -v
Y `Date'Work Completed:_ j z
? _7G,d.A/bone
B Land Application Site WUP Y� 4
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequai?--mui drland for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management: hydraulic and nutrient loading rates. I y
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): `� • _ �iT��l rS.c�✓
Affiliation " DateWorkCompleted:
Address (Agency)- 4 Phone No.:
Signature:' Date: l Z 'o
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check rite appropriate box
Facility without exterior lots SD or WUP or RC `F
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
J
Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print)
Affiliation
Address (Agency):-
Stgnature:�4
AWC -- August 1, 1997
Phone No..
r r r

D). application and Han_dlin Egui ment
Check the �appropriare box
� Existin}or.expand:n� iacilty with esistins waste tivn eauiomenl (WLr or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can corer the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established, required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as pan of
the plan).
J New. expanded,orexisting facility without existing waste agplication equipment for -spray _irrigation- (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Q New. exyanded, or existine facility without existing wasteanvlication muiptnent for land sr)readinQ not usins
Sdv 1111" Ll u \ ,. ....a — "
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan. (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or. nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can.be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan). ('
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation. Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): �l s -Z Plione No.:
E) Odor Control. Insect
%�- D
tv Management and'Emergen
SL WLP. RC or D
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Nlinimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are t;ottlplete and can be implemented by this a ty.�
i3
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Address (Agency):
Sianau re:
pleted:
'Zone No.:
eta• l� 3t
F) Written Notice of New or E_Ma dingy Swine Fanri'O"?y�,�zs
The foilawing signature block[ is only to be used for new or espan iYtk- artr>_s that begin construction after June
DY3Car
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and 311 property owners
who own property located across a public road. street. or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCGS I06-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owrs notified is
attached_ - —---_-_— _ ----- ne--- --- -- ----
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Date:
Signature: Date:
,WC .. August 1. 1997 3

III. Certification o, f `Installation
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Installation
New. expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds. have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certif cation is 11ecessan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
4--
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone .No.:
Signature: Date:
ii) Land :,d]pncanon Site (vr uri
Check Meappropriateg
�propriate bo
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
7`1 Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (monthlday/year); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
Q Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop For erosion control:
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):��;:
Address (Agency):
Signature:
This following signature block is
above has been checked.
completed:
y i
Prone No.:
3._
=_Date: /Z
to be used wheb' hL'iox;foi conditional approval in In B
.y9 •�, ;; . Vri � J y
e?'`�eakFS it �yi _
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan,
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DELI a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject the (us) to an
enforc-went action from DELI.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
;name of Manager (if different from owne.+- - -- — --- --
Signature: Date:
A«C -- august 1. 1997 4

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with 'exterior lots
c_or 1,.unr7`nc a heavv use .�.-eas: avt2 be2n inclatlPH nC me llzlilUdS CO iFlininliZe lllz run Ut Oa pollutants L�IlL� xtv�=� wuc��ia�� u:.:, clfled
in the plan.
For•facllIties without exieflor lots, RQ C rtiflation is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): vfJ
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) Application and Handling Equipment Installation (WUP or I)
Czeck the nare block
1ap�Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
-_J C]1F�d1 Wasic a�Y
uLau1�u aiw u15145.u..a �•3•••Y•� � �r3,- = r--• -- --- - -- -
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract: equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained: calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
}J Conditional approval: Anim:J waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (monthldavivear); there is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the,plan: and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are con as part bf'ihe.plan
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):.
Affili
Address (Agency):
Signature:
The following signature block is
above has been checked.
Pate Work Completed:
_ Phone No.:
- Date:
to be used when the box�,for conditional approval in III D
I (we) certify that I (wd) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan gad will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager- (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and Mortality
1 iethods to control odors and insects as specified in
mortality management system as specified in the Plan t
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation
Address (,agency):
Signature:
WUP. RC or I)
filled and are operational.
is o rational.
.�1]ate Worlc.Compleied-
53 ``7i' } JPilone No.
Date:
z*.
The
Any C -- Au-Tust 1. 1997

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Branch, Compliance Unit
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC .- August 1, 19917 6

AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
3000 sows X 6.1 tons waste/sows/year = 18300 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
3000 sows X 4.32 Ibs PAN/sows/year = 12960 PAN/year
RECEIVED
W41; ER 0UALJTy SEC -,ION
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner. AN 2 2000
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop tobb4iuwl a Perrritur'q
soil type and suface application.
TABLE 1 : ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE &CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES LBS AW APPLIC.
DETERMINING PHASE CODE NIACRE NACRE USED TIME
1796
1
AUTRYVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
1.69
454.
APR- SEPT
1796
1
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
50
0
1.69
84.5
SEPT- APR
3197
10
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
2.52
567
APR -SEPT
3197
- 10
FORKO.7%
WA
1
50
0
2-52
126
SEPT-APR
3197
10-A
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
01
2.39
537.7
APR -SEPT
3197
- 10-A
FORK 0-7%
WA
t
50
01
2.39
119.5
SEPT - APR
3197
11
FORKO-7%
BH
4.51
225
01
Z63
591.7
APR - SEPT
3197
i 1
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
50
01
2.63
131.5
SEPT -APR
3197
12
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
2251
01
2.35
528.7
APR - SEPT
3197
- 12
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
50
01
2.35
117.5
SEPT-APR
3i 97
13
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
2.35
528.7
APR - SEPT
3197
- 13
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
50
0
2.35
117.5
SEPT-APR
3197
14
FORK 0-7%
SH
4.5
225
0
2.96
666
APR -SEPT
3197
- 14
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
50
0
2-96
148
SEPT - APR"
3197
15
FORK O-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
2.52
567
APR -SEPT
3197
15
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
50
0
2.52
125
SEPT - APR
3197
15-A
FORKO-7%
BH
4.51
225
0
0.9
202.5
APR -SEPT
3197
- 15-A
FORK O-7%
WA
1
50
0
0.9
45
SEPT -APR
1796
16
AUTRYVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
2.45
673.7
APR -SEPT
1796
- 16
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
50
0
2.45
122.5
SEPT -APR
3197
16
ALITRYVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
2.45
673.75
APR - SEPT
3197
16
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
50
0
2.45
122.5
SEPT -APR
1796
2
AUTRYVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
1.07
294.25
APR - SEPT
1796
2
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1E
50
0
1.07
53.5
SEPT- APR
1796
3
AUTRYVILLE ALL
BH
5.51
275
0
1.26
346,5
APR - SEPT
1796
- 3
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
50
0
1.25
63
SEPT -APR
1795
4
AUTRYVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
2.97
816.7
APR -SEPT
1796
4
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
50
0
2.97
148.5
SEPT -APR
3197
5
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
1.47
330.7
APR - SEPT
3197
- 5
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
50
0
1.47
73.51
SEPT - APR
3197
6
FORK 0.7%
BH
4.5
225
0
4.22
949.5
APR - SEPT
3197
6
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
50
0
4.22
211
SEPT-APR
3197
7
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
2.28
513
APR -SEPT
3197
- 7
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
501
0
2.28
114
SEPT -APR
3197
8
FORK 0.7%
SH
4.5
2251
0
2.31
519.75
APR -SEPT
3197
8
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
50
0
2-31
116.5
SEPT-APR
3197
9
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.51
225
0
2.5
562 5
APR - SEPT
3197
- 9
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
50
0
2.5
125
SEPT - APR
1796
51
AUTRYVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
3.73
i025.
APR - SEPT
1796
- S1
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
50
0
3.73
186.5
SEPT- APR
1796
S2
ALITRYVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
0.22
60.5
APR -SEPT
1796
- S2
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
50
0
0.
11
SEPT-APR

97
F31
S3
FORK 0 7%
BH
4.5
225
0APR-SEPT
97
- S3
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
50
0
2.
110
SEPT -APR
3197
S4
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
01
0.42
94.5
APR - SEPT
3197
.- S4
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
50
0
0.4
21
SEPT -APR
3197
S5
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
0.46
103.5
APR - SEPT
3197
S5
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
50
0
0.461
23
SEPT -APR
3197
S6
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
01
0.591
132.75
APR -SEPT
3197
S6
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
50
0
0.59
29.5
SEPT - APR
3197
S7
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
1.41
317.25
APR -SEPT
3197
S7
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
50
0
1.41
70.5
SEPT -APR
3197
S8
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
2251
0
0.26
58.5
APR -SEPT
3197
S8
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
50
0
0.26
13
SEPT -APR
1796
S9
AUTRYVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
0.35
104.5
APR -SEPT
1796
- S9
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
50
0
0.38
19
SEPT - APR
TOTALS: 16375
-- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
' Indicates a Crop Rotation
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in
some eastern counties of NC to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
��� e ���°

TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND
ACRES S AW
N
N USED
TABLE 1 52.
TOTALS: 52.96 15,375/Y 5/Z `/ V U
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED. 14960 QO�
BALANCE .2,415
This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste
N produced.
Acres show in each of the proceeding tables are considered to be the usable acres
excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and
perimeter areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres iri the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the
tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of
sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nurtudent rich and will require precautionary
measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility
will produce approximately 2640 pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the
sludge that will need to be removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when
broadcasting the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well special
equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See the attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of
irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture
content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of
irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the
gyp.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 5.92 months. In no instance should the volume
of waste being stored in your structure be within 1.58 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsiblity of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
APPLICATION APPLICATION
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE CROP RATE (inthrj AMT (inches)
1796
1.--16,--2,--3.-4.-St.--32,-
UTRYVILLEALL
WA
0.35
"1
1796
1, 16, 2.3, 4, 51, 32, s9
ALITRYVILLEALL
BH
0.35
'1
3197
-15,--15-A,
FORK 0-7%
WA
0.35
'1
3197
3. 14, 15, 15-A. 5,6.7.8.9, s3
FORK 0-7%
BH
0.35
.1
3197
-16
UTRYVILLE ALL
WA
0.35
.1
3197
16
UTRYVILLE ALL
BH
0.35
-1
This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of
nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Pane 5 of in

AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
3000 sows X 6.1 tons wastelsows/year =18300 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
3000 sows X 4.32 Ibs PAN/sowslyear = 12960 PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have
appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type and suface application.
TABLE 1 : ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE &CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES LBS AW APPLIC.
DETERMINING PHASE CODE NIACRE NACRE USED TIME
1796
1
AUTRYVILLE ALL
SH
5.5
275
01
1.69
464.75
APR- AUG
1796
1
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
100
0
1.69
169
SEPT- MAR
3197
10
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
2.52
567
APR -AUG
3197
- 10
FORK 0.7%
WA
1
100
0
252
252
SEPT -MAR
3197
10-A
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
2.39
537.75
APR - AUG
3197
- 10-A
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
2.39
239
SEPT - MAR
3197
11
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
2.63
591.7
APR -AUG
3197
11
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
1001
0
2.63
263
SEPT - MAR
3197
12
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
2251
0
2.35
528.75
APR - AUG
3197
12
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
1001
0
2.35
235
SEPT - MAR
3197
13
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
1__
2.35
528.7
APR - AUG
3197
13
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
2-35
235
SEPT - MAR
3197
14
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
Z96
666
APR - AUG
3197
- 14
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
2.96
296
SEPT - MAR
3197
15
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
2.52
567
APR -AUG
3197
15
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
2.52
2521
SEPT - MAR
3197
15-A
FORK 0-7%
8H
4.5
225
01
0.9
202.5
APR -AUG
3197
- 15-A
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
0.9
90
SEPT - MAR
1796
16
AUTRYVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
2.45
6M.75
APR -AUG
1796
16
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
1001
0
2.45
245
SEPT - MAR
3197
16
AUTRYVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
2.45
673.75
APR -AUG
3197
16
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
100
0
2.45
245
SEPT - MAR
1796
2
AUTRYVUE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
1.07
294.25
APR - AUG
1796
- 2
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
100
0
1.07
107
SEPT -MAR
1796
3
AUTRYVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
Z751
0
1.26
346.5
APR - AUG
1796
3
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
100
0
1.261
126
SEPT-MAR
1796
4
AUTRYVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
2.97
816.75
APR - AUG
1796
4
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
100
0
2.97
297
SEPT - MAR
3197
5 IFORK
0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
1.47
330.7
APR -AUG
3197
- 5
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
1.47
147
SEPT -MAR
3197
6
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
4.22
949.5
APR -AUG
3197
6
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
4.22
422
SEPT-MAR
3197
7
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
226
513
APR -AUG
3197
- 7
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
1001
0
2-28
228
SEPT -MAR
3197
a
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
2251__
2.31
519.75
APR - AUG
3197
8
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
01
2-311
231
SEPT -MAR
3197
9
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0i
2.5
562.5
APR -AUG
3197
9
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
2.5
250
SEPT - MAR
1796
St
AUTRYVILLE ALL
SH
5.5
275
0
3.73
1025.
APR -AUG
1796
- S1
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
1
100
0
3.73
373
SEPT -MAR
1796
S2
AUTRYVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
2751
0
0.22
60.5
APR - AUG
1796
- S2
UTRYVILLE ALL
WA
I 1
1001
01
0.221
22
SEPT - MAR
Panda 7 of 1 n

3197
S3
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
2.2
495
APR -AUG
3197
- S3
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
220
SEPT -MAR
3197
S4
FQRK 0-7%
SH
4.5
225
01
0.42
94.5
APR -AUG
3197
- S4
FORK 0-7%
WA
11
100
01
0.42
42
SEPT -MAR
3197
S5
FORK 0r7%
SH
4.5
225
0
0.46
103.5
APR-AUG
3197
S5
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
0.46
461
SEPT - MAR
3197
S6
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
0.59
132.7
APR - AUG
3197
- S6
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
0
0.59
59
SEPT - MAR
3197
S7
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
1.41
317.
APR - AUG
3197
S7
FORK 0-7%
WA
1
100
01
1.41
141
SEPT -MAR
3197
S8
FORK 0-7%
BH
4.5
225
0
0.28
58.51
APR -A
3197
- s8
FORK 0-7%
WA
1 i
100
0
0.25
26
SEPT - MAR
1796
S9
AUTRYVILLE ALL
SH
5.5
275
01
0.38
104.5
APR -AUG
1796
- S9 JAUTRYVILLE
ALL
WA
1
100
01
0.38
381
SEPT - MAR
TOTALS: 18023
-- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
Indicates a Crop Rotation
NOTE: The applicator is.cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in
some eastern counties of NC to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen. ZD
4"
/rj r / �r f/ •
p"W,;.
6/za/oa
Panes 3 of 1(1

TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 ANDXlf
ACRES LBS Aw
MUSED
/f
TABLE 1 52. i8,073
/T �•
TOTALS: 52-961 18,023
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED: 12,960
—BALANCE 4,063
3 -Za41
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste
N produced.
Acres show in each of the preceeding tables are considered to be the usable acres
excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and
perimeter areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the
tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of
sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nurturient rich and will require precautionary
measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility
will produce approximately 2640 pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the
sludge that will need to be removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when
broadcasting the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well special
equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See the attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of
irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture
content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of
irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the
crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 5.92 months. In no instance should the volume
of waste being stored in your structure be within 1.58 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsiblity of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
APPLICATION APPLICATION
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE CROP RATE (in/hr) AMT (inches)
1796
--16,-2-3,-4,-S).-s2,
AUTRYVILLE ALL
WA
0.35
`1
1796
1, 16, z, 3, 4, 51, sz S9
AUTRYVILLE ALL
BH
0.35
'1
3197
-U. -15-A� -5, -b, -7, -,8,
FORK 0-7%
WA
0.35
'1
3197
5. 14, 15. 15-A, 5, 6, 7, s, 9, S3
FORK 0-7%
BH
0.35
'1
3197
-16
UTRYVILLE ALL
WA
0.35
'1
3197
16
UTRYVILLE ALL
BH
0.35
"1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of
nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount -shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Pang 5 of 10

NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Your waste utilization plan calls for Bermuda -Hay as your primary crop and as the winter
annual rye grain. The lagoons now act as two stage lagoons and your sampling shows
that the nitrogen reduction is responding well to the two -stage treatment. You have 180
days of storage; however, we recommend that no more than 90 days of storage be used
without spray irrigating. The EMC sixth guidance memo (revision two) recommends that
spray irrigation not be applied to winter annuals or rye over -seeding during December or
January. You may spray during that time but are encouraged to control your lagoon
capacity not to require spraying during that time except during extreme conditions. Your
lagoon levels should be at their lowest by the end of November.
If you spray irrigate during December and January, you must harvest all winter annuals
by the time they head or by April 7. It must receive an additional harvest by the time the
canopy reaches 12 to 15 inches high.
Your facility produces 12,960 pounds of P.A.N. per year plus 2,640 pounds of P.A.N.
from sludge per year for a total of 15,600 pounds. The commitment you have made to
providing permanent pasture allows you the maximum nitrogen uptake and with over -
seeding the ability to spray year around if needed. Your actual sampling will produce
lower nitrogen amounts than used in this plan that may allow some of your pasture not to
require over -seeding. The nitrogen amount in the sludge may offset the reduction in the
second stage liquid. It is our recommendation that you slurry your sludge and try to
reduce it to below one foot depth and apply at agronomic rates annually. You will need
to over -seed 100% of your pasture until sludge has been stabilized before considering not
over -seeding any pastureland.
Your WUP Table I gives you the option of spraying your BH through September and
allowing you to apply only 50 pounds of N between September and April on the WA.
When not applying sludge, you are not required to over seed all your acreage. You must
decide before August 31 the amount of over sewing you will install. Should you over
seed with WA and want to apply 100 pounds of nitrogen, you must stop spraying the BH
by August 31. You must spray between September 15 and October 30 at 50 pounds and
another 50 pounds during February and March.

` "���Ft i . _' „ i�' y' ¢, •y �-`'emu•—�,�_ , �,; . n
c � r
'�w,r � _ r� •��yr
�• � Ta '3r'�""'�� '�•.� .. _„�y. �/ ` } �'} e ��jib,�5. r�uUi ft `+ei�'�f
r''•,�` _G` N '8� •P;,,� ,` �� \ \ .y7 ^��r'7vr fv x=J•
1i �. r r-la
F�.r
T '`'' 3'r •'� c1 iC ""/� .r,.•✓ a �j�Ts=''AR i.y .. "1` `Ca jj• pyf
C,cr. t .t�j/ •. rfr i� ., C rrC.�� ML'•T4A W=
mk �i
•• t i-r; �`�� a'` ) .- �"J ,pt ..,ram r t.... , T�
r .G P,i/,@� f 4 e •: l� e� \4,rAN•. C ;.,r,.,,, vYr;-f � ��\,; `•a✓ � 1 ��j✓�, ,tlu.ap.1,
+�>� si1 Nd F�.. ,F- e` ♦ � .f'n '+TJ A' ITiY � '- � � Ce` T � ' r �i�.. „i� 1
` "`� k. ter' `r" � - � r a . •.. 1 S T,a
r t .) Ef d A� s 1iT J; r� i t •' -rT 1 �, tl, k M 1j:
.e <}�, F; a„-T,^ ,'�'�1'a�k.��' �'•� ^4 t �'rN �^w. 'F"" =IF�F� I�0•-.* `ts �' t?��
v .C. i !y _ t �' � brPr 1��.,.M_° tl i�Y ,,.P�)+ y, ` P •f F
j•M « 2 x ,r� :I ,iN' f l _ yn r� �w,�^'� S sy = i. , "�' � di-� Y 1
h r _�yr# !• r rig r ` x " , -. ,y,.;�=k `'.q 7 •' .:'1 r�� .1 +Y
tSur '✓;'• J# •.R 8 ftJ y',f'�r S 3 4 A . ' .i� �f�K!•Y'''•
' •r r P'"`ie.1. "rt
$' tl .y. a 44 , 'y ">y�y� t`t'y� �'�rtyty •d� r'/ YJ8', `C " �,if�w,�!. • ; •Sj t = « e
@ry 1`xr" X7I�X"* ' e 4 t�L W ' \k":F:'"�t�"i �C • k .�•.
q� q'c rJi z�rih.➢� u r,y °arr 7�y� v » 'fd y, �k )i {vC•�:;, ,.�,,
kn
cr
�x , ��w �a*E' (rY !'' LJ4 rY'e'�3•� d �+� � . Cl � fi ' 1
y �r IL
y y-wi �S ��'�� �'�•� �TG�'�Pi $� ��s� R � r � �C,- j +gg'���,j�i,••� �E,,�"�'r^fy. M1 � � M1 : s`��?C �• ` 1 Y � 1 � �
f y a'? ri �`• tf rre� f ^#L ,dJg?p ?R.� 1• -Art—.
,
���T� � nl:� ,n�F"r''yr, � « •G�• '�r �m kr- !� .K � � W a ` `
"xi �r,Qr 7 3�{q'fy �'iwj'y p�Qr`' >i[ tr.•'�yAd i s y- it � ••�a � � ��/if w{{ err 'h .[r(y�ct�FA•rS {�r �♦� �}%��p. r / f`
k' � �P• `� MG'y {S�']���Pwy��• G�}�r��}'{"` 1���R1•i`dY � !«f^�)J �J ���.4 3 ''��14:%))J YZ �Y !'^'h?�' • � / V
'"�H *+rpr � t �'� iilt+)'4- -. I w �.,•' + � 'F i+''t' Y} ai k t � V i ,=ta' E 3r Y "'/
._t.1..:.i..._...._.. +t_'T w11_`'� r4i. _._�� �_��....�-.._v _. "'. -.', 9 r:.. � 1. J .r„•, ,
c%" 9

From: "SUE HOMEWOOD" <[e-mail]>
Organization: DWQ Water Quality
To: "Dave Holsinger" <[e-mail]>
Date sent: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 14:36:56 EST
Subject: Re: 67-1
Priority: normal
ok, we will certainly note it. I'll see if a CAWMP came in with the
cert. form (sometimes they do.) What would probably be best is if
one of you guys can go out and do an inspection. Then we can
definately inform the owner that they are in violation and file
against the PE if needed. Let me know what you see, I'll send you a
copy of the cert. form today.
> From: "Dave Holsinger" <[e-mail]. state. nc.us>
• Organization: WiRO DENR
> To: [e-mail]. state. nc.us
> Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 14:36:28 -0500
• Subject: 67-1
• Priority: normal
* Sue,
* ---FYI---
• Bill Norris (Onslow SWCD) has called raising a concern with the
> certification of this facility. This facility had some major
> problems to overcome to be certified. Pat Hooper (DSWC) had been
> working with them to retrofit, etc. Apparently, they went to a
• private P.E. in Sept/Oct and now the facility shows as certified.
• Bill seriously doubts that the work could have even been started much
> less finished before Dec. 31, let alone Dec. 8. In addition, the
> district has not received a copy of the CAWMP to review. I think
• this should be noted in the database file until we can sort out what
• is going on.
> David R. Holsinger
> Environmental Engineer
• Department of Enviroment and Natural Resources
• Division of Water Quality
• 127 Cardinal Drive Extension
• Wilmington, NC 28405
> [e-mail]

• Ph: 910-395-3900
• Fax: [phone]
• "GO HUSKERS"
Sue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
PO Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
phone: [phone] ext 502
fax: [phone]

t
9103924424 P.01
Environmental Chemists, Inc.re �
Consulting Chemists
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: u SHIPPING ADDRESS:..
P.O. Box 1037 [phone] (Office) 6602 Windmill Way
Wrightsville Beach, [phone] (Lab) Wilmington,
North Carolina 28480 [phone] (Fax) North Carolina W405
FI%X HEADER SHEET +
COMPANY:
FAA n :
FROM.
Rick Shiver
NCDEHNR—DEX
(910) 350--2004
Lew Hicks
I AM3ER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW; 2 3 4 5 6 7 $ 9 10
DITE SENT
4/10/96
C p:•i'? E:: T S
Report #2557 ([dater: -Advanced Genetics)

910�924424
P.02
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
7 G MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: SHIPPING ADDRESS:
P,O, Box 1037 (910) 2%-3934 (Offirr) "502 Windmill Way
CHEMIST$ CWrightsville Beach, (910) 39241223 (Lab) Wilmington,
WEMiST5 North Carolina 28480 [phone] (Fax) North Carolina 28405
R RT QF .A.NAL 1-.5X.9
NCDEHNR--DEM Date Scrupled: 3/27/96 Date Of Deport: 4/10/96
127 Cardinal Drive Ext. Client -
_ _ Sampled By: P. D.#:
Wilmington, NC 28405 Report to: Rick Shiver Repurtl: 2557
W1.AX,ER. Advanced Genetics
3D 3B
i651 #1652
Fecal Coliform, Col/100m1 180 -
Ammonia Nitrogen, NH3-N mg/L -- 24.3
TKN, mg/L - 27.6
Nitrate + Nitrite Nitrogen, NO3+NO2-N mg/L - 1.41
Total Phosphorus, mg/L - 11.3

From: Self <NROAR021N1EW372>
To: Ramsey Dennis
Subject: ADVANCED GENETICS SWINE FARM, ONSLOW CO 67-1
Cc: WILBURN DIANNE, SLEDGE BOB
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 199610:21:02
RECENT INSPECTIONS BOTH FROM THE AIR AND GROUND ON JULY 18, AND 22,
1996 INDICATED THAT RUNOFF FROM THE SPRAY FIELD WAS ENTERING ADJAC
DITCHES LEADING TO WATERS OF THE STATE. THERE IS A PENDING
ENFORCEMENT ACTION SENT MAY 9, 1996. IN ADDITION, A NOV WITH INTENT
TO REVOKE DEEMED PERMITTED STATUS WAS ATTACHED TO THE CD REPORT
WOULD LIKE TO KNOW THE STATUS OF THE REPORT AND WE HAVE NOT RECEI
A COPY OF THE SIGNED NOV. PLEASE LET US KNOW WHAT THE STATUS OF THI
FARM IS, SO THAT WE MAY PROCEED. WE HAVE ARIAL PHOTOS, AND A COPY O
THE RECENT INSPECTION REPORT IF THEY ARE NEEDED -PLEASE
ADVISE ..... MIKE

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Wilmington Regional Office
Water Quality Section
July 26, 1996
TO: Dianne Williams Wilburn
THROUGH: Dave Adkins
FROM: Mike Williams
SUBJECT: Case # CD 96-02 Addendum
Advanced Genetics-Neuhoff Fauns
Facility # 67-1
Onslow County
On July 18, 1996 and July 22, 1996, aerial and ground inspections were performed
by Regional staff at Advanced Genetics-Neuhoff Farms. Wastewater discharges from the
#1 spray field were observed on July 18, 1996, as the attached aerial photographs
indicate. The field contains a ravine that transports hogwaste to the adjacent ditch leading
to an unnamed tributary to the New River. A ground inspection could not be made at the
time of the overflight. The facility was revisited July 22, 1996, when indications of runoff
were confirmed. Wastewater was not being applied at the time of the visit, however,
evidence of runoff before the visit was detected. The farm manager, Mr. Brian Patane, was
informed that a discharge had occurred prior to the visit. Mr. Patane was instructed to
cease irrigation on field #1 until the ravine had been filled and the field allowed to dry.
Corrective actions are proposed to be initiated within the next week. Samples were not
collected on either day. By the time the staff could return to the farm on July 22, the
discharge had been terminated although indications of the discharge were shown_
It is requested that this memorandum be included as a part of the enforcement
report submitted by this Office, May, 9, 1996. If there are any questions concerning this
matter, please advise.
MW:ADVGEN.JL6
cc: Wilmington Regional Office

i
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Wilmington Regional Office
Water Quality Section
July 26, 1996
TO: Dianne Williams Wilburn
THROUGH: Dave Adki
FROM: Mike Willk
SUBJECT: Case # CD 96-02 Addendum
Advanced Genetics-Neuhoff Farms
Facility # 67-1
Onslow County
On July 18, 1996 and July 22, 1996, aerial and ground inspections were performed
by Regional staff at Advanced Genetics-Neuhoff Farms. Wastewater discharges from the
#1 spray field were observed on July 18, 1996, as the attached aerial photographs
indicate. The field contains a ravine that transports hogwaste to the adjacent ditch leading
to an unnamed tributary to the New River. A ground inspection could not be made at the
time of the overflight. The facility was revisited July 22, 1996, when indications of runoff
were confirmed. Wastewater was not being applied at the time of the visit, however,
evidence of runoff before the visit was detected. The farm manager, Mr. Brian Patane, was
informed that a discharge had occurred prior to the visit. Mr. Patane was instructed to
cease irrigation on field #1 until the ravine had been filled and the field allowed to dry.
Corrective actions are proposed to be initiated within the next week. Samples were not
collected on either day. By the time the staff could return to the farm on July 22, the
discharge had been terminated although indications of the discharge were shown.
It is requested that this memorandum be included as a part of the enforcement
report submitted by this Office, May, 9, 1996. If there are any questions concerning this
matter, please advise.
MW:ADVGEN.JL6
cc: Wilmington Regional Office

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governorti
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 12, 1996
Neuhoff Farms Inc
Neuhoff Farms Inc (AG)
PO Box 158
Richlands NC 28574
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Neuhoff Farms Inc (AG)
Facility ID#"'`67=1
Onslow County
Dear Farm Owner:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919n33-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P ctor
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, CN�y� FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 1 - 50% recycied/10% post -consumer. paper

ci ati_
—aa 1
�r r,
-1x3N /ypc;�-7V-7 .3!h N4 —7764r"` -D---A'�
i

• 11.'• r�'. �(1w. • 1t•4'n
a .,. s �' �ti •.,
r.✓'".r'�,r, f _ �•' ••�ny�...-'.fir ti
ter. �' / . '-.. •:' .�f�l' 1`•: ,,1i,
.h �.. �'I4 �1 f � '�1 , Rom•
i(j 4
- � r..• YYii V
L d5y1���l�t� s�A;� ,fr*].-��Cr tf�� `�r��AY•�1����IJ
ry �• 4 ff7✓r � - �r4'la•.. „ pt l tr}i �'+�-��r
t .r • e
r

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Wilmington Regional Office
Water Quality Sect or n
May 9, 1996
TO: Dennis Ramsey, Chief
Operations Branch
THROUGH: Rick Shiver,
Regional Supervisor
FROM: David Holsinger,,
Environmental Engineer
SUBJECT: Enforcement Action
Neuhoff Farms
Advanced Genetics
Onslow County
Please find attached information and documentation pertaining to enforcement actions
recommended for the Advanced Genetics Swine Farm by the Wilmington Regional Office.
Neuhoff Farms, Advanced Genetics operates a swine animal operation located adjacent to
NCSR 1225, in Onslow County.
It is recommended that appropriate enforcement actions be taken against Neuhoff Farms,
Advanced Genetics, 408 Hargett Street, Richlands, North Carolina, 28574.
A re -inspection of this facility on March 27, 1996 by DEM staff found a discharge to an
unnamed tributary (UT) of the New River. The discharge was observed from runoff due to
excessive application of wastewater onto a spray field. The runoff entered a farm pond from
which an overflow pipe discharges into the UT. Water chemistry samples revealed elevated
levels of Fecal Colifor n Bacteria, ammonia and nutrients being discharged into the UT.
This discharge is considered to be willful and intentional. The lagoon had been allowed to
rise to a critical level. The spray application site had become super saturated resulting in a
large runoff event while the spray application operator was in the field supervising the
application. In addition, the discharge of waste to surface waters occurred through a man
made conveyance.
Advanced Genetics was designated as a Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation on
November 15, 1991 as a result of a documented discharge on October 21, 1991. On
February 15, 1993, Advanced Genetics was assessed &r civil penalty of $3366.50 in response
to another documented discharge of waste on October 21, 1992. (CD92-06, attached)

e %
Memo
May 9, 1996
Page 2.
Advanced Genetics has been working to become compliant with the Division since an
inspection on July 27, 1995 revealed two over flow pipes in the third stage lagoon. The
pipes had been removed before this last inspection.
If you have questions or would like more information, please contact Dave Adkins or David
Holsinger at 910-395-3900.
attachments
cc: Wilmington Files
s:lwgsldavehlonslow167-1. mem

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jimmy Neuhoff
Neuhoff Farms
408 Hargett Street
Richlands, NC 28574
Subject: Notice of Violation
Notice of Intent to Revoke Deemed Permit
Advanced Genetics Farm
Facility Number 67-1
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Neuhoff:
You are hereby notified that Advanced Genetics farm, which has been
deemed permitted to have a nondischarge permit for an animal waste disposal
system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217, has been found to be in violation of its
2H .0217 Permit.
On March 27, 1996, Staff from the Wilmington Regional Office of the
Division of Environmental Management observed a discharge of wastewater by the
Advanced Genetics Farm to an unnamed tributary of the New River. Wastewater
was being applied such that large amounts of runoff from the spray field occurred.
The runoff entered an on -site farm pond which discharges to surface waters
through an overflow pipe. A sample taken of the pond overflow from the pipe
revealed elevated levels of fecal coliform bacteria, ammonia, TKN and phosphorus.
Within 60 days from your receipt of this letter, the Division of Environmental
Management intends to revoke Neuhoff Farms, Advanced Genetics Swine Farm's
permit unless the following conditions are completed:
=i
1. Immediately eliminate the discharge of was4water or correct the violation.
2. Make any modifications needed to ensure there will be no future discharges.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

r S
Mr. Jimmy Neuhoff
Page 2.
3. Send in an approved animal waste management plan .and have the attached .
certification form completed. This form and a copy of your plan must be returned
to the address below and to your local Soil and Water District:
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section Operations Branch
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Failure to comply with the above conditions will cause the existing animal
waste management system serving your animal operation to be considered in
operation without a permit as required by North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.1.
The facility may be deemed to have a permit following revocation if the former
permittee makes such a request in writing and the previously stated conditions are
met to the full satisfaction of the Director.
Your approved animal waste management plan must explain how you will
collect, store, treat and land apply your animal waste to the land in an
environmentally acceptable manner. To assist you in the development of this plan
and to provide the required certification that the plan is acceptable, you should
contact your local agricultural agencies such as the Soil and Water Conservation
District, the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service, the North Carolina
Cooperative Extension Service or a technical specialist designated pursuant to the
rules adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
If we have not received the requested animal waste management plan and
certification within 60 days of receipt of this letter or if there are additional
discharges to the surface water, a civil penalty of up to $10,000 may be assessed
and you must apply for an individual non discharge permit from the Division. Please
find attached a permit application which must be completed and returned if you
wish to apply for an individual non discharge permit. This permit, if issued, will
contain monitoring and reporting requirements determined to be necessary by the
Division. This letter does not prevent the Division of Environmental Management
from taking enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violations.
ik

f
Mr. Jimmy Neuhoff
Page 3.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to
contact either (David Adkins), Water Quality Regional Supervisor for our
(Wilmington Office) at (910)-395-3900 or Mr. Shannon Langley at (919) 733-
5083, ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Rick Shiver, Regional Supervisor
Harry Tyson, County Soil and Water Conservation
Tom Jones, Regional Coordinator, NC DSWC
Compliance/Enforcement File
Wilmington Files
s:1wq sldnvohlons 1ow167-1. oov

e
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF ONSLOW
IN THE MATTER OF
ADVANCED GENETICS FARM
NEUHOFF FARMS, INC.
FOR A VIOLATION OF
G.S. 143-215.1(a) (1)
MAKING AN OUTLET INTO
WATERS OF THE STATE
it NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
File No. CD
}
}
}
} FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215:6A, I, A. Preston
Howard, Jr., Director of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM), make the following:
1. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A_ Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of North Carolina and operates a animal feeding operation
located along NCSR 1225, in Onslow County, North Carolina
B. On March 27, 1996, DEM staff observed a discharge of wastewater from an animal
waste land application system entering a farm pond and flowing into an unnamed
tributary of the New River in the White Oak River Basin.
C. In a letter dated November 25, 1991, the Director, Division of Environmental
Management (DEM), notified Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms, Inc. by certified
mail that said animal operation had been designated a "Concentrated Animal
Feedlot Operation" (CAFO) in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H. 0122 and 40 CFR
122.23.
D. The Director's letter stated that as a result of the CAFO designation, all discharges
of animal waste to waters of the State must be permanently eliminated within 60 days
or an application for a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit must be submitted.
E. The Director's letter also stated that thiCAFO designation could be contested by
filing a petition. for an administrative hearing in the Office of Administrative Hearings
(OAK) within 30 days of receipt of the designation letter.

a
F. Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms, InjL neither applied for an NPDES permit' nor
petitioned for an administrative hearing to contest the CAFO designation.
G. On March 27, 1996, personnel from DEM's Wilmington Regional Office inspected
the animal operation and observed waste from the land application system flowing
into a farm pond, thus entering an outlet and flowing into an unnamed tributary of the
New River in the White Oak River Basin.
H. The waters of the New River are classified as Class "C NSW" waters of the State.
I. On October 30, 1992, the_DEM Regional Supervisor sent Advanced Genetics,
Neuhoff Farms, Inc. a Notice of Violation stating that discharging animal waste
without a permit was a violation of G.S. 143-•215.1. The Notice ordered the
immediate elimination of all discharges and stated that an enforcement action was
being prepared against the operation.
J. The costs to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totalled $498.23.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
H. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms, Inc. is a "person" within the meaning of
G.S.143-215.6A and G.S. 143-212(4).
B. The New River constitutes waters of the State within the meaning of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(1) and G.S. 143-212(6)_
C. Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms, Inc.'s animal operation, a properly designated
CAFO, was required to obtain an NPDES pennit prior to discharging animal wastes
into waters of the State.
D. Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms, Inc.'s discharge of animal waste into waters of
the State without a permit on or about March 27, 1996 was a violation of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(1).
E. A civil penalty of up to $10,000.00 per day per violation may be assessed pursuant to
G.S. 143-215.6A(b).
F. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Advanced
Genetics, Neuhoff Farms, Inc. pursuan;:to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-
282.1(b) (8) . ic

G. The Director, Division of Environmen4Management, pursuant to delegation
provided for by G.S. 143-215.6A(h), has the authority to assess civil penalties in this
matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms, Inc. is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$ for making an outlet into -the waters of the State in violation of G.S.
143-215.1(a) (1).
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is percent of the
maximum penalty authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A.
$ 498.23 Enforcement costs.
$ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount.of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in G.S.143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or
to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which
the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures-.
(Date) A. Preston Howard, Jr.,_P.E., Director
Division of Environmen ; Management
s Awgsldavehlons1ow167- I .zd

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ENFORCEMENT CASE ASSESSMENT FACTORS
Type: (CD)
Violator: Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms, Inc.
Address: 408 Hargett Street
Richlands, North Carolina 28574
Regional Office: Wilmington
1. The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources
of the State, to the public health, or to private
property resulting from the -violation: The discharge
from the farm pond on March 27, 1996 displayed levels
of fecal coliform bacteria of 180 colonies per 100 ml.
Levels of other constituents found were as follows:
Ammonia Nitrogen, NH3-N 24.3 mg/L
TKN 27.6 mg/L
NO3 + NO2 1.4 mg/L
Total P 11.3 mg/L
The waste applied to the field has been treated through
a three stage lagoon system. While any discharge of
animal waste to surface waters is unacceptable, in this
situation the waste has been cycled through an aeration
process to a fourth stage settling lagoon.' This
additional treatment may account for the levels shown
by the chemical analysis.
2. The duration and gravity of the violation: The spray
field runoff had been occurring for an undetermined
duration. The spray guns on the field were shut down
as soon as DEM staff appeared on the site. Thirty
minutes later when the spray field was inspected, the
surface of the field and the area directly below the
spray field were still completely saturated with
wastewater some 1 inch deep in sheet flow coming from
the field. The ditch leading to the farm pond was
continuing to flow full with velocity (photo).
3. The effect on ground or surface water quantity or .
quality or on air quality: Effects to groundwater and
air have not been documented. Water quality impacts
were determined by water chemistry tests taken March
29, 1996

4. The cost of rectifying the damage: The cost to rectify
cannot be easily estimated. The New River is
classified as "C NSW° Waters —of the State and the waste
discharge into the receivini stream were found to have
high levels of nutrients.
5. The amount of money saved by noncompliance: The amount
of money saved by noncompliance is not.known. Land is
available for proper irrigation, application equipment
is on site and an acceptable cover crop of fescue is
growing at this time.
6. Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally: Due to: 1) The estimated length of time
for the spray application site to become super
saturated, and 2) that the spray application operator
was in the field supervising the application, the
discharge is considered willful. The lagoon had been
allowed to rise to a critical level and the discharge
of waste occurred through a man made conveyance.
7. The prior record of the violator in complying or
failing to comply with programs over which the
Environmental Management Commission has regulatory
authority: Advanced Genetics was designated as a
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation on November 15,
1991 as a result of a documented discharge on October
21, 1991. On February 15, 1993, Advanced Genetics was
assessed a civil penalty of $3366.50 in response to
another documented discharge of waste on October 21,
1992. (CD92-06, attached)
8. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures:
The State's enforcement costs totaled $498.23, as
follows:
Staff
Holsinger, 10=hrs. $217.80
Beck, 2 hrs. $ 49.76
Mileage (110 miles@ $0.25 per mile) $ 27.50
Photography (film & Development) $ 5.17
Laboratory costs 2 samples $ 98.00
Administrative costs $100.00
9. Type of violator and general nature of business (i.e.
Individual vs. large corporation): Corporation
10. Violators degree of cooperation (including efforts to
prevent or restore) or reca-lcitrance: Advanced
Genetics has been working tg become compliant with the
Division since an inspection on July 27, 1995 revealed
two over flow pipes in the third stage lagoon. The
pipes had been removed before the last inspection.

11. Mitigating Circumstances: None. Advanced Genetics
lagoon freeboard level has been allowed to become
critical. While Advanced Genetics is working with the
local Soil and Water Distri� to acquire more spray
area, the amount of acreage available at this time
should be sufficient for application at agronomic rates'
if properly managed.
12. Owner of property where the discharge occurred: Neuhoff
Farms, Inc.
13. Pictures of discharge: attached
14. Assessment Factors:
a) IWC: n/a
b) Receiving Stream: UT to New River
c) SOC/JOC status/negotiations:
d) Copy of MP Screen: n/a
e) Copy of Limits Page in Permit: (0) nondischarge.

t
i ,to .: _Cem:.
-'V T I I�-Cem
W�-i.ice
17.5
�24
Padffck
-
-78—_�� _.
•,1 I " .�a.- 'Ij'.Cem - ----- ----._._..____. ._—_--
—
�S
13$ -1
N F FFA
ADVAOC" :D`
�\ \ -
•i
Cem, ��
_ __y—
.� �' f � - �: J.
25.0
-12
`\
i Wes. /
'L..�
;�� ji
- tl
28.5
I r•'
--
175
--
1221
.;Cem
, 1
25.0
20 ��
�; Cem
Floyd Lake - I
- _
zo/ 1 1J.
`� I IS
24
1227
:+iCem Lake
sue- - I
26.0
21 Cather�ne'�..•-���/// Trailer
=� Park
I
I
La ke

�--\ b l i c, i i
it�4C�4y FtE1. D
{�7EA OT- y2�yhpvE�
PIPES
i-A 61 Co 4
45 E
LA[ToaN
f { �5`
4
Ll
iH ►2 bvt �r
sPRAy FIczD
stow yr (C7(?ALE.D�
W r15" ,r
D�rc�l WHERE 2Urip.�� Cviltc'iED
s
E
D
G
E
NEWNOrr
OIUYAAMF- D e7ZWF7 -f
/40T To SCAr�

POO'" '
' PR 1 "gg6 env
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
® MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: SHIPPING ADDRESS-
- Box 1037 [phone] (Office) 6602 Windmill Way
CONSULTING Wrightsville Beach, -7! [phone] (lab) Wilmington,
CHEMISTS North Carolina 28480 [phone] (Pax) North Carolina 2-8405
REPORT OF ANAL YS.rS
NCDEHNR--DEM
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
WATER: Advanced Genetics
Date Saepled: 3/ 2 7/ 9 6
Supled 81: Client
Report To: Rick Shiver
Date of Report: 4 / 10 / 9 6
P. 0.#: -
geportf : 2557
3D 3B
1651 11652
Fecal Co.liform, Col/100ml 5'Ze 180 -
Ammonia Nitrogen, NH
3-N mg/L a - 24.3
TKN, mg/L z - 27.6
Nitrate + Nitrite Nitrogen, NO3+NO2-N mg/L rS _ 'f - 1.41
Total Phosphorus, mg/L -1 - 11.3
iw

Environmental Chemists, Inc.
env c
...
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: '.' SHIPPING ADDRESS: y _:
CONSULTING P.O. Box 1037 AIL [phone] (Office) 6602 Windmill Way
Wrightsville Beach, (910) 392-M23 (Lab) ":Wilmington
CHEMISTS North Carolina 28480 (910) 392- 424 (Fax) North Carolina 28405
x
CHAIN'OF CUSTODY FOR SAMPLE COLLECTION
Client:.D E NAJ !Z Report # :
Collected By (signature & print))5�6rJEr�=r2
Sample Type:
Collection:
Influent, ffE�l nt, Well, Stream, Soil, Other
For composite Indicate Date & Time for Start & Finish
r
Location &
.identification
Sample
Type
Collection
Date Time
Bottle
ID
Lab
ID
Analysis _
Requested
4�VArJcc�
(? r= !U - S
/
G- k 6 6
q
3 - Z 7 - l (0
2 : 5�
3 �
_
a �
r
�C G Pr L.
� > 10,N)
&7 5
6I?A3
3`27
Z yS
Noz*No3
+21 rnTr S
Transfe Relinquished By Date/Time Received By Date/Time
1
2
Proper Preservative Used: Acid Ifz SOy l;:se Other lb
Received On Ice or Chilled to 40C: Yes L-- No
Accepted Rejected By Comment
Comments
Delivered By���
Date 3 Z -7 _'?
Received By
Time

icecluire5 iinmcufatc iAtX11LiU11. �
Facility No. 6, 7
DIVISION OF ENVIRONINMNTAL M-ANAGE-NENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: ` 2 , 1996,
- Time: ' 3 c7 12G �5 T
Farris Name/Owner:
Mailing Address: Lc Z LDST
County: O VI's f oli
Inte?rator: ' 0-) EL2 (4 0J -rg2c,,1,5 Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone: 1fffyq
Physical Address/Location I �Z 5t/7— v:.<. le- Fwn t S2 12 ?ai
Type of Operation: Swine X Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: J`-� Number of Animals on Site. -�9
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certifcadon Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ` Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste LaQoor_ have sufficient frceboazd or 1 Foot :- 25 year 2^ hour storm event
(approximately I Foot - 7 inches) Yes o ' o Actual Freeboard: _-__Ft. Inches
Was any seepage: observed from me lagoon(s)? Yes orGQ Was anv erosion obse, ved? r�,or No
Is adeouaie land available for s:�_ ? or No Is the cover crop adequate? a5 or No
Crop(s) being utilized: c tee_
Does the facility meet SCS mirw_um setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings`' n or No
100 Feet from N�'ells? Vs or, No
Is the animal waste stockpiled v i_hin 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line SEre=? 0s or No
Is animal waste land applied or _prav irigated within 25 Feet of a USGS tap Blue Line? Yes or�
Is animal waste discharged into % ters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? (IM or No 'If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adea:_ate waste-manaaement records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific -taae with cove, crop)? 0 or No
Addidonal Comments:,-�-0
T
() ( o Ti r r~ /lfr'c cJ P n 1 A k -7A
(S , .)C, viz-
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use .its:: lrr ents if Needed. -

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. L 7 - ►
DWISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGE?YMI T
A \TMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE. 3' ? , 1996
Time: 4 V-v
Fain Name,'Owner: _ A c� U A N c e 6- 1 - r lC
Mailing Address: Lj-d Z C-a 134-�;7y R-ct*, 2 �.G G, 1 -:lll ZLg -7�C
County:
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representadve: r MC Phone: 3 7-
Physical Addres5/1-ocation:
Type of Operation: Swine "x/ Poultry Cattle ,
Design Capacity: `��', S �nw _ _ _ Number of Animals on Site: S ��
DEM Cerdncation Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: tvLonairude: t r,Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient uzeboard of 1 Foot - 25 year 2='. hour storm evert
(approximately 1 Foot r 7 inches) Yes ortfii� Actual Freeboard: Q Ft. �_ Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or i IOW as any erosion observed? or No
Is adequate land available for spray? or No Is the cover crop adequate? -0or No
Crops) being u-zHzZed:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback titeria? 200 Fee: aom DwellinLys? (n or No
100 Feet from Welds? IV-P or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? (�r No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS tap Blue Line? Yes of
Is anitna_1 waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or a If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facilin, maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spry irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)' or No
Additional Comments: �t ��- `G 1►•r� ►U e- Ale-,k •t 7-0 0C1--•-P
•r /
I _r.,e,K�/ , � �L, L � _ !Z. �kl9. �i•n .� •,✓�. rrr. �i''h.�r',.... /i vL: .eP Cs_ �J G:.s..i�_.f
L.—" rrzaA 1 S k"'l r7 r t k4n' PA 71a rv,-t-'D V zw � L L ,, k'a- t j- S s. Z v a
/Le c. /eL 4/.,1
car
Inspector Nam
facility Assessment Unit
S ignature —
Use Attachmrents if Needed.

State of North Car­6Iina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
February.17, 1993
111190 I
1 -4 410-06*91P
Mr. Douglas McWright
Neuhoff Farms, Inc.
1706 Woodwind Drive
Greenville, North Carolina 27858
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for Violation(s) of N.C.
General Statute(s) 143-215. 1 (a)(1)
Onslow County
File No. CD 92-06
Dear Mr. McWright:
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against Advanced Genetics in the amount of
0,366.50 including W6.50 in investigative costs.
Attached is a copy of the assessment document explaining this penalty. This action was taken under
the authority vested in me by delegation pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(h). Any continuing violation(s)
may be the subject of a new enforcement action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Summit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). -Payment of the penalty will not foreclose
further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Regional Offices
Asheville Fayetteville - Mooresville Raleigh V9shington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704R51-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-I699 919/571-4700 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/896-7007
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

2.
3.
Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a
detailed justification for such request:
AL
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure
for contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the .
assessment letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an
administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of
your right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no
factual or legal issues in dispute. You must execute and return to this office
the attached waiver and stipulation form and a detailed statement which you
believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
282. 1 (b)-were-wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you,wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must
request an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a
written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office
Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447. A copy of the
petition must be served on the Depamnent as follows:
Office of General Counsel
NCDEHNR
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

Failure to exercise one of the options above within jbiny days, as evidenced by a
date stamp (not a postmark) indicating when -we received your response, will result in this
matter being referred to the Attorney General's Office vAMT a request to initiate a civil action `
to collect the penalty. Please be advised that additionalZssessments may be levied for
future violations which occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Kent Wiggins or Dianne Williams
Wilburn at [phone].
Sincerely,
4/4Z
APreston Howard, ., E.
Acting Director
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Regional Supervisor
Compliance/Enforcement File
Central Files
Public Information Officer

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVII. PENALTIES AGAINST
PERMIT NO.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMINUSSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO.
Having been assessed civil penalties totalling . for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Environmental
Management dated, , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of
the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter
and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the
day of
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
19—

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF ONSLOW
IN THE MATTER OF
Advanced Genetics
Neuhoff Farms Inc.
FOR A VIOLATION OF
G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1)
MAKING AN OUTLET INTO
WATERS OF THE STATE
Acting pursuant to Nort
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
File No. CD 92--06
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
h
A. Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms, Inc. is a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of
North Carolina and operates a concentrated animal feeding
operation located at 402 Costin Road, Richlands, North
Carolina, in Onslow County. Mr. David Watkins is the
manager of this operation.
B. On October 21, 1991, DEM staff observed a discharge of
wastewater from an animal waste lagoon entering the
adjacent wetlands which flows into an unnamed tributary
of the New River in the Whiteoak River Basin.
C. In a letter dated November 15, 1991, the Director,
Division of Environmental Management (DEM), notified
Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms Inc., by certified mail
that said animal operation had been designated a
'Concentrated Animal Feedlot Operation" (CAFO) in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H. 0122 and 40 CFR 122.23
D. The Director's letter stated that as a result of the CAFO
designation, all discharges of animal waste to waters of
the State must be permanently eliminated within 60 days
or an application for a National Pollution Discharge
Elimination*System (NPDES) permit -must be submitted.
E. The Director's letter also stated that the CAFO
designation could be contest & by filing a petition for
an'administrative hearing in tie Office of Administrative
Hearings (OAH) within 30 days of receipt of the
designation letter.

II.
F. Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms Inc. neither applied for
an NPDES permit nor petitioned for an administrative
hearing to contest the CAFO dgsignation.
G. On October 21, 1992, person el from DEM's Wilmington
Regional Office inspected the swine operation and
observed waste from a waste lagoon.flowing over the dike
wall and entering the adjacent ditch, an unnamed
tributary -of the New River in the Whiteoak River Basin.-
H.- The waters of Unnamed Tributary to New River are
classified as Class C NSW waters of the State.
I. On October 30, 1992, 1992, the DEEM Regional Supervisor
signed a Notice of Violation stating that discharging
animal waste without a permit was a violation of G.S.
143-215.1. The -Notice ordered the immediate elimination
of all discharges -and stated that an enforcement action
was being prepared against the operation.
J. The costs to the State of the enforcement procedures in
this matter totalled $366.50
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms Inc. is a "person".
within the meaning of G.S.143-215.6A and G.S.143-212 (4) .
B. Unnamed Tributary to New River constitutes waters of the
State within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.1 (a) (1) and G.S.
143-212 (6) .
C. Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms Inc., a properly
designated CAFO, was required to obtain an NPDES permit
prior to discharging animal wastes into waters of the
State.
D. Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms Inc.'s discharge of
animal waste into waters of the State without a permit on
or about October 21, 1992 was a violation of G.S. 143-
215.1 (a) (1) .
E. A civil penalty of up to $10,000.00 per day per violation
may be assessed pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(b).
F. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be
assessed against Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms Inc.
pursuant to.-G.S. 143-215.3(a) (9) and G.S. 143B-
282.1 (b) (8) .
G. The Director, Division of Ergironmental Management,
pursuant to delegation provided for by G.S. 143-
215.6A(h), has the authority to assess civil penalties in
this matter.

Based on the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I
make the following:
III. DECISION
:I
Accordingly, Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms Inc.,is hereby.
assessed a civil penalty of:
3000. o0
for making an outlet into the waters
of the State in violation of
G.S.143.215.1(a) (1) .
TOTAL, CIVIL PENALTY, which is 3 0
percent of the maximum penalty
authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A.
Enforcement costs.
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE.
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount
of the penalty I have considered the factors listed in G.S.
143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of
the State, to the public health, or to private property
resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality
or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally;
(7) The.prior record of the violator in complying or failing
to comply with programs over which the Environmental
Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State o he enf rcement procedures.
(Date) A. Preston Horn rd, Jr.
Acting Directo
Division of Environmental Management

.,
WSW TOP
ur
.acac tQ
rs
or rlrwwr[+ wu - a:
ewT f4a rra r� .
w�• , salela• TO R, 11i1 rT01 rn Mo
}gyp net La
ft
&x )
LAGMi
Average Inside top elegy. = 48,62 Ft,
lnsidv top area = 144,324 sq. ft.
Average bottom vtev. . 39.61 Ft,
Bottom area - 121,716 eq. ft,
LAGD13N 2
Avvra Qv inside top el vr. = 42.56 ft.
Inside top area = 69,459 sq. ft.
Average bottom etev. = 330t ft.
Bottom area - S5J69 sq. ft.
LACOOK 3
Average inslele top Nev. - 43.86 ft.
In$Ide top area - 100,660 sq. ft.
Average bottom etev. = 33.33 rt.
Bottom area = SZ.092 Sq. ft.
LACOON 4
Average 6 side top eto— • 45,51 Ft.
in$we top area = 33210 5% ft,
Average botton elev. - 37.19 ft.
Sotton area = 20213 sq, ft.
Pla rJ Ile
I
ADVANCED GENETICS
NEIIHOFF SWINE FARM
ONSLO1f COUNTY. N.C.
i e.Aouu ou4&T elrt or orowmarria.
WALtM. "M µTk" WlQiaCiS
Lon Of SOL AM aAtO co"arv►rlaw
M
tee. �rr2M1i
4+w. laienr
�.l !I['JHOrr p4'

R �V
a �1
FannNeuboffs in.
1706 Woodwind Dr.
Greenville, NC 27858
(9191 756-2421
August 30,
Mr. Rick Shiver
Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845
Dear Mr. Shiver:
I FSEP
0 ;
...�.......................
SE.P 0.1 ASSS
In response to your letter dated August 16, Neuhoff Farms
has taken immediate action to remedy the situation at our truck
cleaning facility. We ceased operating the facility immediately
and we are currently pursuing a permit. We have contracted the
engineering services of Mr. Paul Wysocki of Advanced Consulting
Services in Jacksonville to aid in the permitting process.
As you indicated in your letter, we were unaware that this
activity was not regulated as an agricultural activity. Now that
we are aware that we need a different type of permit we will work
diligently to obtain the proper documents. We have always oper-
ated this waste storage system in a safe manner and it has never
been a threat to the environment.
Thank you for your cooperation in dealing with this issue.
We will correct our permit status as soon as possible.
Yours Truly,
James H. Neuhoff, Jr.
Vice President of Operations
cc. Mr. Ken Rakestraw

Ps Form 3800, April 199s.
C'. 24 -0
w+O [ant6 @ ru
I tu
9-0
noo Er
r CL
C3
Ak
SENDER: COmPL TE TWS SECTION
N Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
0 Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
E Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
A. 2R3� iv �by(Pl �Printjlaarly) 1113. Date of0eliviTy
C. Signat") 0 Agent
X 13 Addressee
U. is OMVMy address 0111001F PIMP REM 1 f
1. Article Addressed to: If YES, enter delivery address below- 0 No
144 AV_ I- Ne, L� �' if
/—? 0 & LU.' -0 � 4D 4r,
are. Al( 3. Service Type
19 Certified mail El Express Mail
13 Registered 11 Return Receipt for Merchandise
11 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (F dm Fee) 0 Yes
2. Article Number (Copy from service labe,o ',2
7 C 3
BPS Farm 3811,:i6iy 199M"I' I bor r n I estic Return Receipt 102595-99-M-1789 i''
Lim k I f

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr. Division of Environmental Management Jonathan B. Howes
Governor Water Quality Section Secretary
August 16, 1995
CERTIFIED MAIL # Z 275 496 080
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Ken Rakestraw
Neuhoff Farms - Advanced Genetics !
P.O. Box 158
Richlands, North Carolina 28574
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Permit Required - Construct or Operate a Treatment Works
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Rakestraw:
This letter is to notify you that the Neuhoff Farms - Advanced Genetics farm is in violation of
North Carolina general Statute 143-215.1 (a)(2) for the construction and operation of a disposal system
serving a truck cleaning operation without receiving a permit. Violations of this Statute can lead to civil
penalties of up to $10,000 per violation in accordance with N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A. It is understood that
you are working with Mr. Bill Norris of the Onslow Soil and Water District Office, and that you were
unaware that this activity required separate permitting. Please be advised that this activity is not regulated
as an agricultural activity under the Division's animal waste management regulations. However, this type
of operation is regulated under the Division's regulations for nondischarging pollution abatement systems.
You should immediately cease usage of the treatment and disposal system and apply for a permit
for the construction and operation of a treatment and disposal system. I have enclosed a nondischarge
permit application for your convenience: If you select this permitting option, you should retain a licensed
engineer to submit the permit application along with detailed plans, specifications and calculations, as
necessary. Another permitting option may be to contact the Onslow County Health Department for a
subsurface disposal system permit.
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845 • Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

f
Mr. Ken Rakestraw � •
August 16, 1995
Page Two
This Office requests that you provide a written response within 15 days of the receipt of this Notice
detailing actions that you have taken and future actions that you propose in order to correct this permitting
deficiency.
If you have further questions concerning this matter, you may contact Ms. Pat Durrett or myself
at [phone].
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver, P.G.
Regional Supervisor
PD: NEUTRK.NOV
cc: Bill Norris - Onslow Soil and Water District
R��lmiugton Regional -Office
Central Files
a

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr. Division of Environmental Management
Governor Water Quality Section
August 14, 1995
Certified Mail # Z275 496 080
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Jimmy Neuhoff
Neuhoff Farms
408 Hargett Street
Richlands, North Carolina 28574
Resources
Subject: Neuhoff Farms
Advanced Genetics
Facility Number 67-1
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Neuhoff:
Jonathan B. Howes
Secretary
On July 27, 1995 Staff from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Environmental
Management inspected your animal operation and the lagoon(s) serving this operation. It was observed
that your waste lagoon had two pipes going through the dike wall of lagoon # 3. These pipes must be
removed and the lagoon repaired according to the requirements of NRCS. You should contact your local
NRCS agent prior to the removal of the pipes. You are reminded that no discharge of waste to surface
waters can occur.
To remain a deemed permitted facility, you must submit a Waste Utilization plan within 60 (sixty)
days of your receipt of this letter_ Failure to do so may result in the facility losing it's deemed permitted
status and being required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility.
Please be aware it is a violation of North Carolina General Statutes and Rules to discharge
wastewater to the surface waters of the State without a permit and/or to fail to follow a certified waste
management plan. The Division of Environmental Management has the authority to levy a civil penalty
of not more than $10,000 per day per violation.

,Mr. Jimmy Neuhoff
August 14, 1995
Page 2
When the required corrective actions are complete, please notify this office in writing at the address
below. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Pat Durrett or Dave Adkins at (910)
395-3900.
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
Regional Supervisor
cc: Dave Adkins Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Harry Tyson - County Soil and Water Conservation District
Onslow - County Health Department
Tom Jones - NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Operations Branch
Pat Durrett

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
February 17, 1993
Mr. Douglas McWright
Neuhoff Farms, Inc.
1706 Woodwind Drive
Greenville, North Carolina 27858
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for Violation(s) of N.C.
General Statute(s) 143-215.1(a)(1)
Onslow County
File No. CD 92-06
Dear Mr. McWright:
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against Advanced Genetics in the amount of
0,366.50 including V66.50 in investigative costs.
Attached is a copy of the assessment document explaining this penalty. This action was taken under
the authority vested in me by delegation pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(h). Any continuing violation(s)
may be the subject of a new enforcement action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources (do not incWe waiver form). Payment of the penalty will not foreclose
ftiriher enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
i'
Regional Offices
Asheville Fayetteville - Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704R51-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/5714700 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/896-7007
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a
detailed justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration ofthe
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure
for contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the
assessment letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an
administrative hearing, such. a request must be accompanied by a waiver of
your right to an administrative hearing'and a stipulation that there are no
factual or legal issues in dispute. You must execute and return to this office
the attached waiver and stipulation form and a detailed statement which you
believe establishes whether.
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
282.1(0) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Environmental Management
P.Q. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
OR
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you. wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must
request an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a
written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office
Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447. A copy of the
petition must be served on the Department as follows:
Office of General Counsel
NCDEHNR
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

Failure to exercise one of the options above within the days, as evidenced by a
date stamp (not a postmarkj indicating when we received your response, will result in this
matter being referred -to the Attomey General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action
to collect the penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for
future violations which occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Kent Wiggins or Dianne Williams
Wilburn at [phone].
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, BE
Acting Director
ATTAC EIl ENTS
cc: Regional Supervisor
Compliance/Enforcement File
Central Files
Public Information Officer

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
PERMIT NO.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADM USTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO.
Having been assessed civil penalties totalling for
violation(s) as set forth in'the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Environmental
Management dated, , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of
the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter
and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of , 19_
BY
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF ONSLOW
IN THE MATTER OF
Advanced Genetics
Neuhoff Farms Inc.
FOR A VIOLATION OF
G.S. 143-215.1(a) (1)
MAKING AN OUTLET INTO
WATERS OF THE STATE
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
File No. CD 92-06
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-
215.6A, I, A. Preston Howard, Jr., Acting Director of the Division
of Environmental Management (DEM), make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms, Inc. is a corporation
organized"and existing under the laws of the State of
North Carolina and operates a concentrated animal feeding
operation located at 402 Costin Road, Richlands, North
Carolina, in Onslow County. Mr. David Watkins is the
manager of this operation.
B. On October 21, 1991, DEM staff observed a discharge of
wastewater from an animal waste lagoon entering the
adjacent wetlands which flows into an unnamed tributary
of the New River in the Whiteoak River Basin.
C. In a letter dated November 15, 1991, the Director,
Division of Environmental Management (DEM), notified
Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms Inc., by certified mail
that said animal operation had been designated a
"Concentrated Animal Feedlot Operation" (CAFO.) in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H. 0122 and 40 CFR 122.23
D. The Director's letter stated that as a result of the CAFO
designation, all discharges of animal waste to waters of
the State must.be permanently eliminated within 60 days
or an application for a National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit must be submitted.
E. The Director's letter also stated that the CAFO
designation could be contested by filing a petition for
an administrative hearing in the Office of Administrative
Hearings (OAH) within 30 days of receipt of the
designation letter.

F. Advanced Genetics,. Neuhoff Farms Inc. neither applied for
an NPDES permit nor petitioned for an administrative
hearing to contest the CAFO designation.
G. On October 21, 1992, personnel from DEM's Wilmington
Regional Office inspected the swine operation and
observed waste from a waste lagoon flowing over the dike
wall and entering the adjacent ditch, an unnamed
tributary of the New River in the Whiteoak River Basin.
H.- The waters of Unnamed Tributary to New River are
classified as Class C NSW waters of the State.
I. On October 30, 1992, 1992, the DEM Regional Supervisor
signed a Notice of Violation stating that discharging
animal waste without a -permit was a violation of G.S.
143-215.1. The Notice ordered -the immediate elimination
of -all discharges and stated that an enforcement action
was being prepared against the operation.
J. The costs to the State of the enforcement procedures in
this matter totalled $366.50
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms Inc. is a "person"
within the meaning of G.S.143-215.6A and G.S.143-212(4).
B. Unnamed Tributary to New River constitutes waters of the
State within the meaning of G.S.- 143-215.1 (a) (1) and G.S.
143-212 (6) .
C. Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms Inc., a properly
designated CAFO,'was required to obtain an NPDES permit
prior to discharging animal wastes into waters of the
State.
D. Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms Inc.'s discharge of
animal waste into waters of the State without a permit on
or about October 21, 1992 was a violation of G.S. 143-
215.1 (a) (1) .
E. A civil penalty of up to $10,000.00 per day per violation
may be assessed pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(b).
F. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be
assessed against Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms Inc.
pursuant to G.S.-143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-
282.1 (b) (8) .
G. The Director, Division of Environmental Management,
pursuant to delegation provided for by G.S. 143-
215.6A (h) , has the authority to assess civil penalties in
this matter.

Based on the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I
make the following:
III. DECISION
Accordingly, Advanced Genetics, Neuhoff Farms Inc. -is hereby
assessed a civil penalty of:
.�jOo. po
oao- po
$
for making an outlet into the waters
of the State in violation of
G.-S.143.215.1 (a) (1) .
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is .3 0
percent of the maximum penalty
authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A.
Enforcement costs.
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE.
As_required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount
of the penalty I have considered the factors listed in G.S.
143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of
the State, to the public health, or to private property
resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality
or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing
to comply with programs over which the Environmental
Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State o he enf rcement procedures.
(Date) A. Preston Howard, Jr.
Acting Director
Division of Environmental Management

ftrms IIiC.
1706 Woodwind Dr.
Greenville, NC 27858
[phone]
C -R'Pro
L')hSIC) LAI
Mr. Edward N. Beck, Jr.
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Dr. Ext.
Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845
Dear Mr. Beck:
(1-b
RECE-NEC)
NOV 18 1992
Wilmington Regional Office
DEM
November 161 1992
As a result of your October 21, 1992 inspection of our
Advanced Genetics lagoons we have made some changes in our opera-
tions. We have contacted Mr. Harry Tyson at the Onslow County
ASCS office to aid in calculating the needed acres of grass land
to properly dispose of our waste. The total amount of land
needed will be changing as we alter the use of our barns at the
Advanced Genetics farm. Also, we have contacted Dr. Mac Safley
of NCSU about employing his services to help us in establishing a
better nutrient management program. He is highly regarded in the
hog industry for his skills in nutrient management and I believe
that he can have a major impact on our program.
I recently moved to North Carolina and assumed my position
in charge of our North Carolina operations. I was not aware of
the problems that we had on our lagoons until your inspection in
Octcber. Our company has always had a strict policy about waste
discharge and I was shocked to find tndt we were not in full
compliance. I have given David Watkins an official Letter of
Reprimand due to his poor management of the waste disposal system
at Advanced Genetics and I have included a copy of this letter
for you to review. We have invested over $150,000 at the hdvance
Genetics farm in lagoons, irrigation equipment, and pasture to
properly dispose of the waste. The problem now appears to be the
water build up in the lagoons. So we are re -grading around the
lagoons to channel the rain water toward the drainage ditch.
Also, we are evaluating our water usage in some of the buildings
as I believe that we could conserve :pore water and waste less.
Mr. Beck, I want you to realize that it is our intention to
fully comply with our ZERO runoff policy. I will be visiting our

ftrms11�1�.
1706 Woodwind Dr.
Greenville, NC 27858
{919} 756-242
operations weekly and I am personally inspecting
agement systems to insure that there will be no
lieve that your inspection of our farm in October
new awareness of the waste management issue and
to improve our system.
Sincerely.,
James H. Neuhoff, Jr.
Vice President - Operations
cc. David Watkins Advanced Genetics
James H. Neuhoff President
the waste man -
runoff. I be -
has created a
we fully intend

Farms �in�c.
•
1706 Woodwind Dr.
Greenville, NC 27858
1919) 756-2421
Mr. David Watkins
Neuhoff Farms, Inc.
402 Coston Rd.
Richlands, N.C. 28574
Dear David:
•
November 16, 1992
This is an official Letter of Reprimand concerning your
waste management. It is Neuhoff Farms' policy to have absolutely
no waste runoff and you violated this policy. I realize that
there were several extraordinary events that occurred that con-
tributed to the waste water build up, but the end result is that
there was a lagoon run over and it was your responsibility to
control the water levels. Neuhoff Farms has invested over
$150,000 in lagoons, irrigation equipment and pasture establish-
ment at your facility to aid in waste water disposal. Since you
have experienced difficulties in properly managing this system I
have contacted Dr. Mac Saf ley of NCSU to aid us in setting up a
program that will insure that our system will not generate a
runoff.
This. Letter of Reprimand will remain in your file for three
years. At the end of three years your waste management perform-
ance will be reviewed before this letter is removed.
Sircer=l.11
-
James H. Neuhoff, Jr.
Vice President - Operations
cc Mr. Edward N. Beck, Jr. DEM✓
Mr. James H. Neuhoff President

-:
N*JHOFF' FARMS, !
INC.
P.O. BOX 158.:' 14 W. HARGETT ST.. MCH'-_ANDS, NC • 28574
[phone]
"
RECE,IV�
fe6nuanry 21, 1992 a o FEB 271992
-S Q� (! r tvi Imfvon Regional fffc�
g �" �""�� �iJ V
nCr,A ,
State of Nonth CanolL na 4
=
Dept. o CnvLAonment, tlea.Lth Nat. Peaounceh
512 N. Sal i-A6UAY St.
Raleigh, NC 27604
.'
To d(lhom It May Concenn:
�f%a�v_ance_d`Ge_net-�c4., a dLviaion a Neu.h.o. Fart. Inc. .located in
2ich.Landh, NC ruah identified ah a highL� concentnated animaZ -
�. _
noun depaafinent. the dL4chazge �nom oun eeding oPenatcvn 6
ti}
thi.nd htage .Lagoon which wah noticed 6.e.5 Ed Beck duping. ALh
vi.hit. hai 6e.en eliminated. lhzh wah e.c.i.minated 6 capping o��
an oven�.Low pipe which wah placed in 0,e .Lagoon w en Lt wah
conAtnucted come twenty 1ye.a.nh ago. Our pnehent innigati.on
:..
methodh and f.Luhhinq hchedule hah kept oun .Lagoonh in check.
Sincene.Lcy,
�� 'r�'✓i
�,uc•(,'
David Wathink
s`
Managers
F
.
s _ F
r
.
i
R Y.

r F m Wes-*«
NEUHOFF FARMS, INC.
P.O. BOX 158,414 W. HARGETf ST.. RICHLANDS/
[phone]
F ebrtuartg 21, 1992
State o� Nonth CanoLina
Dept . of Cnvirtonmenf, Health & Nat. R eAouncea
512 N. Sali46uA St.
Raleigh, NC 27604
To Whom If May Concertn:
C r 28574 �,,'
3
i."&R 111992
Regjonal afftcr
3fIA
4dvanced geneficA, a dLviALon of Neuhojf Faam, Inc. located in
RLcflandh, NC waA idenfL�Led aA a highl concentrtated animal
Oeding opertafion by r�ourt departtment. the diAchang,e from ours
third Afage lagoon whc.ch waA noticed by Ed Beck durting: hi4
vihit hah been elLmLnated. T AiA wah e7LmLnafed b�t capping o
an overt�low pipe which waA placed in the .lagoon wfren Gf waA
conAtnucted come twenty ryeaAA ago. Oun pne4enf irtrtigafion
mefhoda and flu4Ah ng hchedule has kept oun lagoons En check.
Sincertely,
,,.Ld A -.
David WathinA
Manage&
cc: Ed Beck

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
October 30, 1992
Certified Mail P 379 272 669
Return Receint Reauested
Mr. David Watkins, Manager
Advanced Genetics
Division of Neuhoff Farms, Inc.
402 Coston Road
Richlands, North Carolina 28574
Subject: Notice of Violation
Discharge of Animal
Waters of the State
Advanced Genetics
Neuhoff Farms, Inc.
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Watkins:
Bob Jamieson
Regional Manager
Waste into
This is to advise you that you are in violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 by discharging animal waste to
waters of the State. On October 21, 1992, an investigation was made
by members of the staff of the Wilmington Regional Office. At the
time of the investigation, waste was observed discharging from the
dike of a waste lagoon to the adjacent ditch which flows to an
unnamed tributary to New River, which is classified Class C NSW
(Nutrient Sensitive Waters).
A similar investigation was conducted on October 21, 1991, in
response to a complaint. At that time a discharge was observed from
an overflow pipe in the final waste lagoon. The farm was designated
as a concentrated animal feeding operation by the Director of the
Division of Environmental Management by letter dated November 15,
1991.
An enforcement report- is being prepared containing
recommendations for the assessment of civil penalties in accordance
with the provisions of NCGS 143-215.6. A civil penalty of not more
than ten thousand dollars may be assessed for the violation.
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845 • Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

•
Mr. David Watkins
October 30, 1992
Page Two
•
You are again urged to contact the Onslow County District
Conservationist at [phone] for assistance in proper waste
management and disposal.
It you have any questions concerning this matter, please
contact Mr. Ed Beck or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Qriginai Signed By:
RICK SHIVER
Rick Shiver, P.G.
Acting Regional Supervisor
EB:NEUHOFF.112
cc: Steve Tedder
Tom Jones (Soil and Water)
Harry Tyson (Onslow Co. District Conservationist)
r-W 1--mington_Regional_Fi] es
Central Files

m
C
7
7
C
O
M
E
`o
,L
��
P 379 272 669
Receipt for
Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided
Do not use for International Mail
(See Reverse)
Set [o
David Watkins, Mgr.
SluWvsurced Genetics
Dlidgian
P.a4,6 te60sron Road
P-Rdehlands, NC
1574
Certified Fee
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt Showing
to Whom & Date Delivered
Return Receipt Showing to Whom,
Date, and Addressee's Address
TOTAL Postage
& Fees
Is
Postmark or Date
Mailed 11/02/92
I
•

° RECEIVED
��-�• ,BAN -
State of North Carolina Wilmington Regional Off-'eo
CIEM
Department of Environment, Health, and Naturalesources .
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 276Q4
James G. Martin, Governor George T. Everett, Ph.D,
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary January 16, 1992 Director
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. David Watkins, Manager
Advanced Genetics
Division of Neuhoff Farms Inc.
402 Coston Road
Richlands, North Carolina 28574 e Aimb
Subject: Designation of Concentrated
Animal Feeding Operation
Advanced Genetics
Neuhoff Farms, Inc.
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Watkins:
This letter is to notify you that the Advanced Genetics
Swine Farm is hereby designated a concentrated animal feeding
operation in accordance with Title 15A, North Carolina
Administrative Code 2H. 0123, and adopted Federal Regulations 40
CFR 122.23. The designation of your hog operation was based on
an inspection conducted October 21, 1991 by a member of the staff
of the Wilmington Regional Office. This Inspection showed that
you had established a concentrated animal feeding operation
requiring such designation based upon the following facts.
1. A discharge of hog wastes from an overflowing lagoon was
entering a ditch which flows to an unnamed tributary to
New River which is classified Class C NSW (Nutrient
Sensitive Waters).
2. The operation houses approximately 9,000 swine, including
1,600 mature sows.
REGIONAL OFFICES
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704/251-6208 9191486-1541 704/663-1699 919/733-2314 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/896-7007
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Sox 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

t
si
Mr. David Watkins
Page Two
A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit is required for discharges of waste to the surface waters
of the State. However, if you can permanently eliminate the
discharges by implementing changes within sixty (60) days of your
receipt of this notice, including, but not limited to,
modifications to the lagoon and the implementation of a final
waste disposal plan, a permit application will not be required.
If compliance has been
achieved, you must notify us in writing within sixty (60) days
describing, in detail, the changes or modifications you made.
If the discharge of waste to the surface waters of the State
is not permanently eliminated within sixty (60) days of receipt
of this notice, an NPDES permit application must be submitted
within that time.
Permit applications should be submitted, in duplicate, to
the Director, Division of Environmental Management, P.O. Box
29535, Raleigh, NC 27626-0535. Assistance, if desired, can be
obtained by contacting Mr. Preston Howard, Regional Supervisor,
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilmington NC 28405-3845 (919)
395-3900. The applications should be accompanied by construction
plans for the animal waste management system.
For your information the following items are enclosed:
1. One copy of the Federal Register - Concentrated Animal
Feeding Operations, 40 CFR 122.23.
2. Three copies of NPDES Discharge Permit application - short
form B.
If you need advice or technical assistance with regard to
managing animal waste, you should contact the Onslow County
District Conservationist at [phone] or North Carolina
State University's Department of Biological and Agricultural
Engineering at [phone].
If you wish to contest this designation, you must request an
administrative hearing within thirty (30) days of your receipt of
this Notice. This request must be in the form of a written
petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North Carolina
27611-7447. A copy of the petition should be filed with this
Office.
If you do not request an administrative hearing, this
Designation will become final in thirty (30) days.

•
•
Mr. David Watkins
Page Three
A copy of this letter is being sent to agricultural agency
representatives for information and to aid them in providing
cooperative assistance. Should you have any questions regarding
this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sinc rely, �j
George T. Everett
Director
Enclosures
cc: Steve Tedder
Preston Howard
Tom Jones (Soil and Water)
Harry Tyson (Onslow Co. District Conservationist)
Xf,-1—i ngton-Re-giona1— Office
Central Files

0 0