The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About310856_HISTORICAL_20171231NORTH CAROLINA Department of Environmental Qud PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES Facility Number: ,31 - B56 Facility Name: Kalmar 11, LLC. Certified Operator Name: David Batts. County: Duplin Operator # 996873 1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways. Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Lagoon NamelIdentifier (0): _KM2_ Spillway (Yes or No): —Yes Level (inches): _26 2. Check all applicable items Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures. Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within acceptable ranges. _X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range. Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list of the proposed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop information. Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water Resources prior to transfer of waste to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste management plan. Operation will be partially or fully depopulated. - attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation - if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility 3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 2119/16 I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and correct. Y Facility Owner/Manager (print) Facility PoA Cover Page 2121100 (signature) Phone: 9'10-935-0221 Date: 2/16116 PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE 1. Structure Name/Identifier (I©): Kalmar II LLC. 2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard a. current liquid level according to marker 26 inches b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 27 inches c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1 inches d. top of dike surface area according to design—305,337 ft2 (area at below structural freeboard elevation) e. line c x line d x 7.48 -oallons - _190,326 gallons 12 ft3 3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period f_ temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days g. volume of waste produced according to structural design —95178 ft3 h. actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = _80,901.3 ft3 certified herd # i. volume of wash water according to structural design 0 ft3 j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design 204,272 ft3 k. (lines h + i +i) x 7.48 x 30 dam _-355,516.03_ gallons line 4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period I. current waste analysis dated 2/3/16 .75 lb/1000 gal. m. (lines e + k) x line 1 = 409.38 lb PAN 1000 — — REPEAT SECTION l FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE II: TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24 HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY PoA (30 Day) 2121100 1 1. structure ID: KM-#2 line m = 409.38 lb PAN 2. structure ID: line m = 1b PAN 3. structure ID: line m = lb PAN 4. structure ID: line m = lb PAN 5. structure ID: line m = lb PAN 6. structure ID: line m = lb PAN n. lines1+2+3+4+5+6 = 409.38 lb PAN Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAYDRAW DOWN PERIOD_ DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CAN NOT RE APPLIES DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD. o. tract # p. field # q. crop r. acres s. remaining IRR-2 PAN balance (Iblacre) t. TOTAL PAN BALANCE FOR FIELD (lbs.) column r x s U. application window' 1896 P-5 Small Grain 1.98 33.90 67.12 SEPT-MAR 1896 P-6 Small Grain 6.06 18.81 113.99 SEPT-MAR 1896 P-7 Small Grain 4.86 30.58 148.62 SEPT-MAR 1896 P-8 Small Grain 4.30 28.22 121.35 SEPT-MAR 1896 P-9 Small Grain 3.04 25.72 78.19 SEPT-MAR 1896 P-40 Small Grain 3.67 27.08 99.38 SEPT-MAR 1896 P-41 Small Grain 1.67 33.59 56.10 SEPT-MAR 1896 P-42 Small Grain 3.92 50.00 196.00 SEPT-MAR 1896 P-43 Small Grain 2.01 41.83 84.08 SEPT-MAR 1896 P-44 Small Grain 4.03 33.60 135.41 SEPT-MAR 1896 P-45 Small Grain 2.19 34.21 74.92 SEPT-MAR 'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available receiving crops during 30 day drawn down period v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 1175.16 lb. PAN IV. FACILITY'S POA OVERALL PAN BALANCE' PoA (30 Day) 2121100 2 189w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) _ 409.38 lb. PAN x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section ill) = 1175.16 lb. PAN y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _-766.78 lb. PAN Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to another permitted facility provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the receiving facility. NARRATIVE: Due to heavy rainfall grower has been limited on pumping windows. When weather and conditions permits he will apply at agronomic rates to return lagoon Back into compliance. Grower also has more land available to apply on that is in WUP if needed. PoA (30 Day) uxvao 3 10 _ Al Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization This plait has been prepared for: Kalmar 11, LLC31856 Ruth Kalmar Leivis 2237 Queens Rd East C"harlotte, 1VC 28207 704-661-7428 07-10-2015 This plan has been developed by: Billy W Houston Duplin Soil & Water Consenation 165 Agriculture Dr Suite B Kenansville, NC 28349 910-296-2120 Developer Signature 'type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only Owner/ManagerlP rod ucer Agreement I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal waste rnanagemcnt that are included with this plan. vuk�--� '7+ / 1�CJ Signature (owner) Date Signature (manager or producer) Date This plan meets the mininnum standards and specifitcations of the U.S. Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission. • r Plan Approved By: /k/ Technical Specialist Signature Date ------------------------------------------------...----------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------•------------- 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 07-10-2015 Cover Page 1 X! Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the fallowing source(s): Comniercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan. S7 Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 10,679,040 gals/year by a 11,520 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days. Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year Broadcast 19249 Incorporated 23 099 hijected 23099 h-rigated 19249 Max. Avail. PAN (lbs) # Actual PAN Applied Obs} PAN Surplus/ Deficit (lbs) Actual Volume Applied (Gallons) Volume Surplus/ Deficit (Gallons) Year 1 19,249 27550 -8,301 11,004,397 -325,357 Year 19,249_ 27790 -8,541 11,100,518 -421,478 -----------`--------------a----------- ---- --- --- -- - ---- - � - -s--- ----------'------ --------------------------------•-------------------- Note: hi source 1 [7, S mens standard source, U means user defnied source. Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source. 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 07-10-2015 Source Page 1 of 1 r. Narrative This WUP has been revised to reflect the new Permit and animal numbers on 12/15/00. Either an AerWay System or Traveling Gnu Avill be used for all irrigation events on this farm. To simplify record keeping the Modified Form- DRAG 1(3/14/2006) should be used to keep up with irrigation events for this facility. 'Pile Smallgrain Cover shown in the WEUT #able represents a Green Manure Cover with the crop residue to be soil incorporated(ANY SIGNUFICANT GROWTH MAY BE CUT AND BALED IF DESIRED) prior to corn planting. IF THE GREEN MANURE COVER IS NOT PLANTED THEN (25LBS N/AC) MAY BE ADDED TO THE PAN RATE FOR THE CORN CROP FOR THAT PUMPING CYCLE. ---------------------------------------------------------------....... -----------------------------•---------------------- - --- 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 07-10-2015 Narrative Page 1 of The table shown below provides a suminaty of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment 'fool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each held, where available. If field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations, The quantity of 1-1205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High, Plaruled Crops Summary Tract field Total Acres Useable Acres Plat IRtirlg Lt Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE P205 ltentoval (lWicre) Applied (lbsfacre) 1896•n f1p5 1.98 1.98 Low WA Norfolk Small Grain Oversced 1.0 Tons 15 141A Hybrid Bemtudagrass Pasture 6.5 Tans 8 NIA 1896-11 flp6 6.06 6.06 Low NIA Norfolk Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Torts 15 NIA Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 6.5 Tons 8 NIA 1896-111 tl 7 4.86 4.96 Low NIA Norfolk Small Grain Overseer I.0'fons 15 NIA Hybrid 9ermudograss Pasture 6.5 'fons 8 NIA 1896-it fl 8 4.30 4.30 Low NIA Norfolk Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 6.5 Tons 8 NIA 1896-11 fl p9 3.04 364 Low NIA Norfolk Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Toms 15 NIA Hybrid Bermudagrrrss Pasture 6.5 Tons 8 WA 1896-11 f2p31 0.43 0.43 Low NIA Norfolk Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons is NIA Com, Groin 115 bu. 51 NIA Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 30 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 28 NIA 1896-11 f2p32 0,70 0.70 Low NIA Norfolk Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 WA Com, Grain 115 ba. 51 NIA Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 30 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 28 WA 1996-11 f3p22 3.08 3.08 Medium NIA Norfolk Small Grain Overseer] 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Corn, Grain 115 bu. 51 NIA Wheat. Grant 60 bu. 30 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 28 NIA 1896-11 f3p23 1.55 1.55 Mcdinm NIA Norfolk Small Grain Overseed 1.0Toas IS WA Com, Grain 115 bu. 51 WA Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 30 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu- 28 NIA ! 89G-11 f.1p24 1 1.27 1.27 A4cdiuni I WA Norfolk Snrall Grain Oversecd I A Tons 15 NIA 885117 Databuse Versiun 4.1 Date Printed 7/10/2015 PC$ Page I of 5 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. Plawied Crops Summary Tract Field TotalUseable Acres Acres Plat RatingRemoval l,[ Soil Series Croy Segllence RYE Pl (Ibsfacre) A ppfned {tbslacre) Corn, Grain 115 bu. 51 NIA Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 30 NIA Soybeans, Maaurcd, Double Crop 35 bu. 28 NIA 1896-I1 f3p24A 1.27 1.27 Medium WA Norfolk Small Grain Overseed 1,0 Tons 15 NIA Corn, Grain 115 bu. 51 NIA Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 30 NIA Soybeans, Manned, Double Crop 35 bu. 28 N A 1896-I1 f3p25 2.62 2.62 Medium NIA Norfolk Small Grain Overseed 1-OTons 15 NIA Cam, Grain 115 bu. 5 t WA Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 30 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 28 NIA 1896-11 f3p26 2.93 2.93 Medium 1 NIA Norfolk Small Grain overseed LO Tons 15 NIA Coin, Grain 115 bu. 51 NIA Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 30 N/A Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 28 NIA 1896.11 f3p27 4.10 4.10 Medium NIA Norfolk Small Grain overseed 1.0 Tons is NIA Corn, Grain 115 bu. 51 MA Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 30 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 28 NIA 1896-11 f3p28 4.10 4.10 Medium NIA Norfolk Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Com, Grain 115 bu. 51 NIA Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 30 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 28 NIA 1896-11 f3p29 4.18 4.18 Medium NIA Nortalk Small Grain Overseed i.0 Tons 15 NIA Con], Grain 115 bu. 51 NIA Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 30 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 28 NIA 1896-II f3p30 4.5 4-59 Medium NIA Norfolk Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 N/A Corn, Grain 115 bu. 51 NIA Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 30 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 28 NIA 1996-I1 Pp10 4.36 4.36 Low NIA Autryville Sma11 Grain ovcrseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Corn, Grain 85 bu. 37 NIA Whcal, Gratin 45 bu. 23 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 25 bu. 20 NIA 1896-11 f4pl1 4.3 4.39 Low N/A Auh),ville Small UrainOvcrseed L0Tons 15 1 NIA 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed 7/10/2015 PCS Page 2 of 5 NOTE: S)gnbol * means user entered data. Planned Crops Summary Tract Field Total Acres Useable Acres Plat Ratilt g Lf Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE P205 1t &&cvv (!bs/acre} Applied lbshm pbsacre) Com, Grain 85 bu. 37 NIA Wheat, Grain 45 bu. 23 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 25 bu. 20 NIA 1896-I1 MIA2 4.31 4.31 Low NIA Autryville Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Com, Grain 85 bu. 37 NIA Wheal, Grain 45 bu. 23 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 25 bu. 20 NIA 1996-11 f4p 13 3.24 3.24 Low NIA Autryville Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 WA Corn, Grain 85 bu. 37 NIA Wheat, Grain 45 bu. 23 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 25 bu. 20 NIA 1896-1I Ap14 3.79 3.79 Low NIA Norfolk Small Grain Ovcrsecd 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Corn, Grain 115 bu. 51 NIA Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 30 NIA Soybeans. Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 28 NIA 1896-11 f4p 15 3.38 3.38 Low NIA Norfolk Small Grain Overseed I.0 Tons 15 NIA Com, Grain 115 bu, 51 NIA Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 30 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 28 NIA 1896-11 f4p 16 4.65 4.65 Low NIA Norfolk Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Com, Grain 115 ba. 51 NIA Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 30 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu: 28 NIA 1896-11 f4p17 4.56 4.56 Low WA Norfolk Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Com, Grain 115 bu. 51 NIA wheat, Gmin 60 bu. 30 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 28 NIA 1896-11 f4p18 1.29 1.29 Low N/A Norfolk Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Com, Grain 115 bu. 51 NIA Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 30 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 28 NIA 1896-11 f4p 19 1.14 1.14 Low NIA Norfolk Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Com, Grain 115 bu. 51 NIA Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 30 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 W. 28 NIA 1896-11 1 f4p20 1 1.35 1.35 Low 1VIA Norfolk Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tans 15 NIA 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed 711012015 PCS Page 3 of 5 NOTE. Symbol * meads user entered data. Plaluied Crops Sullnnafy Tract Field 'total Acres Useable Acres Plat Ratite g I.l Soil Series Crop Sequence AYE P g bm l Qbsracre) A Applied (IbsMcre) Com, Grain 115 bu. 51 NIA Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 30 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 28 NA 1896-11 f4p21 1.52 1.52 Low NIA Norfolk Sntall Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons l5 NIA Corn, Grain 115 bu. 51 NIA Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 30 WA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 28 WA 1896.11 f5p40 3.67 3,67 Low NIA Autryville Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 5.5 Tons 7 NIA 1996.11 f5p41 1.67 1.07 Low NIA Autryville Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 5.5 Tons 7 NIA 1896-11 OP42 3.92 3,92 Low NIA Autryville Sruall Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Hybrid Berrnndagrass Pasture, 5.5 Tons 7 NIA 1896-11 f5p43 2.01 2.01 Low NIA Autryvillo Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons Is NIA Hybrid Bennrtdagrass Pasture 5.5 Tons 7 NIA 1896-11 f5p44 4.03 4.03 Low NIA Autryville Small Grain Overseed LO Tons 15 NIA Hybrid Bermudagmss Pasture 5.5 Tons 7 NIA 1896-11 f5p45 2.19 2.19 Low NIA Autryville Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Hybrid Berrnudagrass Pasture 5.5 ions 7 NIA 1896-11 f6p33 1.27 1.27 Low NIA Norfolk Small Grain Oversced 1.0 -Eons 15 NIA Hybrid Bermudagmss Hay 6.5 'Eons 80 NIA 1896-11 f6p34 1.9 1.99 Low NIA Norfolk Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Hybrid Bemtndagrass Hay 6.5 Tons 80 NIA 1896-11 f6 35 2,46 2,46 Low NIA Norfolk Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Hybrid Sennudagrass Hay 6.5 Tons 80 NIA 1896-U f7p46 4.13 4.13 Low NIA Autryville Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Com, Grain 85 bu. 37 NIA Wheat, Grain 45 bu. 23 NIA Soybeans, Matured, Double Crop 25 bra 20 NIA 1896-If 17p47 1,31 1.31 Low N/A Autryville SnrallGrain. Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Com, Grain 85 bu. 37 N/A Wheat, Grain 45 bu. 23 NIA Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 25 bu. 20 NIA 1896-11 f7p48 2.68 2.68 Low NIA Autryville Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Corn, Grain 85 bu. 37 N/A Wheat, Grain 45 bu. 23 NIA 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed 7/10/2015 PCS Page 4 of 5 NOTE. Symbol * ineans user entered data. Planned Crops St1nunary Field Total Acres Useable Acres Plat Rating(Ibskm Ll Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE P205 RenxwaTract (lbslarre) bs-la d pbs.�me) Soybmns, Manured, Double Crop 25 bu. 20 NIA 1896-11 f7p49 0.75 0.75 Low NIA Arnryvilte Snrail Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Corn, Grain 85 bu. 37 NIA Wheat, Grain 45 bu. 23 NIA Soybeans, ManurM, Double Crop 25 bu. 20 NIA 1896-11 r1p50 2.16.2.16 Low NIA Autryville Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons t5 NA Coco, Grain 85 bu. 37 NIA Wheal, Grain 45 bu. 23 N1A Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 25 bu. 20 MA 1896-li 18p36 1.33 1,33 Low N/A Autryville Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Hybrid Bernurdagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 68 NIA 1896 Il fl1p37 1.73 1.73 Low NIA Autryville Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons t5 NIA Hybrid Bernrudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 68 NIA 1896-II f8p38 1.73 1.73 Low NIA Autryville Small Grain Ovimeed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA Hybrid Berrnudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 68 NIA 1896-11 f8p39 1.64 1.64 Low NIA Autryville Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons IS NIA Hybrid Bemiudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 68 1 NIA PLAN TOTALS: 129,71 129.71 LI Potenlial Leaching Technical Guidance Low potential to contribute to soluble None c 2 nutrient leaching below the root zone. >_ 2 & Moderate potential to contribute to Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. <— 10 soluble nutrient leaching below the root zone. High potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Otter conservation practices that improve utriettt leaching belowtte root zone. the soils availablewaterholdingcapacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be > 10 considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Terns Nlo-ril1(778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391). PLAT Index Raling P Management Recommendation 0-25 Low No adjustment needed; N based application 25 - 50 Medium No adjustment needed; N based application 51 - 100 High Application limited to crop P removal > 100 Very High Starter P application only 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed 7/10/2015 PCS Page 5 of 5 Nan1.: Symbol * means user entered data. The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrientrequirements, - and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake. This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation. Waste Utilization Table Year l Tract Field Source ID Soil Series Toml Acres Use. Acres Crop RYE pppGa Period Nitrogen PA Nutrent Req'd (lbs/A) Camrr. Fert. Nutrient Applied abs/A) Res. (ba,A) Applic. Medrod Manure PA Nutrient Applied Qbs1A) Liquid ManureA ppEied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Field) solid Nlanru'e Applied (Field) 1 N N N' 1000 gaVA Tans 1000 gals tons 1896-111 flp5 S7 Norfolk 1.95 1.98 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 brig. 50 19.97 0.00 39.55 0.00 1896-D flpS S7 Norfolk 1.98 1.98 HybridBermudagrass Pasture 6.5 Tons *3/1-10/31 222 0 0 Jrrig. 222 88.68 0.00 175.58 0.00 1896-11 P p6 S7 Norfolk 6.06 6.06 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 brig. 50 19.97 0.00 121.03 0.00 1896-D f1p6 S7 Norfolk 6.06 6.06 Hybrid Bermudagms Pasturc CS Tons *3/1-10/31 222 0 0 Irrig. 2 88.68 0.00 537.38 0.00 1896-II flp7 S7 Norfolk 4.86 4.86 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3131 5o 0 0 brig 50 19.97 0.00 97.06 0.00 1896-II flp7 S7 Norfolk 4.96 4.86 Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 6.5 Tons *311-10/31 222 0 0 Irrig. 222 88.68 0.00 430.97 0.00 1896-11 flpS S7Norfolk- 4.30 4.30 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 50 0 0 Irrig. 50 19.97 0.00 85.S8 0.00 1896-II flpS S7 Norfolk 4.30 4.30 Hybrid Bermudagrass Pastrue 6.5 Tons *3/1-10/31 222 0 0 IrTi 1 222 88.68 0.00 38131 0.00 1896-II flp9 57 Norfolk, 3.04 3.04 Small Grain Overseed L0 Tons 10/1 3/31 50 0 0 lrrig. 50 19.97 0.00 60.72 0.00 1896-II flp9 S7 Norfolk 3.04 3.04 Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 6.5 Tons *3/1-10/31 222 0 0 Irrig 222 88.68 0.00 269.5S 0.00 1896-II t2p31 S7 Norfolk 0.43 0.43 Small Grain Ovetsced 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 *30 0 0 Irrig. IS 7.19 0.00 3.09 0.00 1896-D t2p31 S7 Norfloll, 0.43 0.43 Com, Grain 115 bu. 2/15-6130 131 0 040 Irrig. 91 36.35 0.00 15.63 0.00 1896-D f2p31 S7 Norfolk 0.43 0.43 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4/30 I25 0 1 0 Irrip, 75 29.96 0.00 12.88 0.00 1896-II Cp32 S7 Norfolk 0.70 0.70 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3r I *30 0 0 Irrig. 18 7.19 0.00 5.03 0.04 1896-II f2p32 S7 Norfolk 0.70 0.70 Com, Grain 115 bu. 2/15-6130 131 0 *40 Irrig. 91 3635 0.00 25.44 0.00 is 6-ti f2p52 57 Norfolk 0.70 0.70 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 1 911.00 125 0 0 brig. 75 29.96 0.00 20.971 0.00 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 WUT Page 1 of 13 Waste Utilization Table Vonr 1 Tract Field Sourcc ID Soil Series Total Acres Use. Acres Crop RYE Applic. Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Rcq'd Qbs1A} Comm Felt. Nutrient Applied pbslA} Res, (lbs/A) Appiia Method Manure PA Nutrient Applied (ibs1A) Liquid ManumA pplied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Fi--Id) Solid Manure AppLed (pick IN N N N 1000 gaVA Tons 1000 gals tons 1896-E f3p22 S7 Norfolk 3.03 3.08 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 *30 0 0 brig. 18 7.19 0.00 22.I4 0.00 1896-17 Op22 1 S7 Norfolk 3.08 3.08 Corn, Grain 115 bu. 2/15-6/30 131 0 *40 brig. 91 36.35 0.00 111.96 0,00 1896-D f3p22 S7 Norfolk 3.08 3.08 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 911-4/30 125 0 0 Uri... 75 29.96 0.00 92.27 0.00 1896-II f3p23 S7 Norfolk 1.55 1.55 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 *30 0 0 Irrig. 18 7.19 0.00 11.14 0.00 1896-D f3p23 S7 Norfolk 1.35 1.53 Corn, Grain 115 bu, 2115-6130 131 0 *40 Irrig. 91 36.35 0.00 56.34 0.00 1896-11 Op23 S7 Norfolk 1.55 1.55 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4130 125 0 1 0 Irrig. 75 29.96 0.00 46.44 0.00 1896-U f3p24 S7 Norfolk 1.27 1.27 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 *30 0 0 Irrig. 181 7.19 0.001 9.13 0.00 1896-U f3p24 S7 Norfolk 127 1.27 Corn, Grain 115 bu. 2115-6/30 131 0 *40 brig. 91 36.35 0,00 46.16 0.00 1S96-II f3p24 S7 Norfolk 127 127 Wh.1, Grain 60 bu. 1 911-4130 125 0 0 Trig. 75 29.96 0.00 38.05 0.00 1896-II f3p24A 57 Norfolk 1.27 1.27 Small Grain Overseed I.0 Tons 10/I-3131 *30 0 1 0 Irrig. 18 7.19 0.00 9-i3 0.00 1896-11 f3p24A S7 Norfolk 1,27 127 Corn, Grain 115 bu. 2/15-650 131 0 *40 Irrig. 91 36.351 0,00 46,161 0.00 1996-II f3p24A S7 Norfolk 1.271 1.27 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1.4/30 125 0 0 Irri& 75 29.96 0.00 3S.05 0.00 1896-E f3p25 S7 Norfolk 2.62 2.62 Small Grain Ovcm=d 1.0 Tons 1011-3r1 *30 0 0 Irrig, I8 7.19 0.00 18.84 0.00 IS%-D f3p25 S7 Norfolk 2.62 2.62 Corn, Grain 115 bu. 2/15-6/30 131 0 *40 Irri& 91 3635 0,00 95.241 0.00 1896-111 f3p25 S7 Norfolk 2.62 2.62 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4/30 1 125 0 0 brig. 75 29.96 0.00 78.49 0.00 1896-n f3p26 S7 Norfolk 2.93 2.93 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 *30 0 0 Ir i& 18 7,19 0.00 21.07 0.00 1896-11 f3p26 S7 Norfolk 2.93 2.93 Corn, Grain 115 bu. 2/15-00 131 0 *40 Irrig. 911 3635 OAO 106.50 0.00 1896-11 f3p26 S7 Norfolk 2.93 2.93 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/14/30 125 0 0 Irrig. 75 29.96 0.00 87,781 0.00 1896-Il f3p27 $7 Norfolk 4.10 4.10 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1 0/13/31 *30 0 i 0 brig. 18 7.19 0.00 29,45 0.00 1896-Il flp27 S7 Norfolk 4.10 4.10 Corn, Grain 115 bu. 2/15-00 1 131 0 *40 Irri& 91 36.35 0.00 149.03 0.00 1896-Il flp27 S7 Norfolk 4.10 4.10 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4/30 125 1 0 1 0 Irrig. 75 29.96 0,00 122.83 0.00 1896-D flp28 S7 Norfolk 4.10 4.10 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 #30 1 0 1 0 irri& 18 7.19 0.00 29.48 0.00 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 WUT Pagge 2 of 13 Waste Utilization Table Year 1 Tract Field Source D Soil Series Total Acres Use. Acres Crop RYE Applic. Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Regd Qbs/A) Comm Fen. Nutrient Applied (1bs1A) Res. Gbs/A) Applic. Metbod Manure PA Nutrient Applied (ibs/A) I,iclaid Man pplied (a=,, Solid Manure Applied (acre) iigid Manure Applied (Field) SoJ:d Manwc Applied (Field) J N N N N 1000 gal1A Tons 1000 gals rams 1896-11 f3p2S S7 Norfolk 4.10 4.I0 Corn, Crain 115 bu. 2/15-6M 131 0 *40 Irrig. 91 36.35 0.00 149.03 0.00' 1896-D f3p28 S7 Norfolk 4.10 4.10 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4/30 125 0 0 Irri& 75 29.96 0.00 122.83 0.00 1896-D f3p29 S7 Norfolk 4.18 4.18 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 *30 0 0 trrig. 18 7.19 O.CC 30.05 0.00 1896-D GP29 S7 Norfolk 4.19 4.18 Corn, Grain 1 I5 bu. 2/15-6/30 131 0 *40 brig. 91 36.35 0.00 151.94 0.00 1896 f3p29 S7 orfolk 4.18 4.18 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9A-4130 125 0 0 Irrig 75 29.96 0A0 125 22 0.00 1896-11 f3p3C S7 Norfolk 4.59 4.59 Small Grain Oversced 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 *30 0 0 Irrig. 18 7.19 0.00 33.00 0.00 M9641 f3p30 S7 Norfolk 4,39 4.59 Cora Grain 115 bu. 21I5-6130 131 0 *40 Imo. 91 36.35 0.00 166.84 0.00 1896-D SP30 S7 Norfolk, 4.59 4.59 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4130 125 0 0 Irrig. 75 29.96 0.00 137.51 0.00 I896-D f4p10 S7 Autryville 4.36 4.36 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 *30 0 0 Irrig. 18 7.19 0,00 31.35 0.00 1896-D f4p10 S7 Autryville 4.36 4.36 Corn, Grain 85 bu. 2/15-6130 104 0 •40 Irrig. 64 25.56 0.00 111.46 0.00 1896-11 f4p10 57 Auuyville 4.36 4.36 Whea4 Grain 45 bu. 9/1-4/30 104 1 0 0 1 Irrig. 62 24.93 0.00 108.67 0.00 18%41 f4p l 1 S7 Autryville 439 439 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-31;1 *30 0 0 brig. 18 7.19 0.00 31.56 0.00 1896-1I Ap11 S7 Autrywille 4.39 4.39 Com, Grain 85 bu, 2/15-650 104 0 040 !frig. 64 25.56 0.00 112.231 0.00 1896-D f4pI I S7 Autryville 4.39 4.39 Wheat, Grain 45 bu. 9/1-4/30 I04 0 0 Irrig. 62 24.93 0.00 109.42 0.00 1896-11 f4p12 S7 Auarille 431 4.31 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 *30 0 0 Irrig. 1S 7.19 0.00 30.99 0.00 1896-11 f4p12 S7 Autryville 4.31 4.31 Corn, Grain S5 bu. M5-6/30 104 0 *40 Irrig 1 64 25.56 0.00 110.18 0.00 1896-R f4p12 $7 Auarillc 4.31 4.31 Wheat, Grain 45bu. 9/1-4/30 1C4 0 0 Irrig, 62 24,93 0.00 107.43 0.00 1896-11 f413 S7 Autryville 3.24 3.2A Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1 10/1-3/31 *30 0 0 Irrig. 18 7.19 0.00 ?330 0.00 1896-11 f4p13 S7 Atttryville 3.24 3.24 Corn, Grain 85 bu. 2/15-6/30 104 0 *40 Irrig. 64 25.56 0.00 32.83 0.00 1396-Il Ap13 S7 AWtyville 3.24 3.24 Wheat, Grain 45 bu. 911-450 104 0 0 Irrig. 62 24.93 0.00 80.76 0.00 1996-11 f4p14 S7 Norfolk 3.79 3.79 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 *30 0 0 Irrig. 13 7.19 0.00 27.25 0.00 IS96-11 Ap14 S7Norfolk' 3.79 3.79 Corn, Grain 115 bu. 2115-6/30 131 0 *40 brig. 91 36.35 0.00 137.76 0.00 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 R7UT Page 3 of 13 Waste Utilization Table bear I Tract Field Some ID Soil Shies Tom[ Aaes Use. Acres Crop RYE AppBG Period Nitrogen PA NLmsnt Reqd C.bs/A) Comm Fert. Nutrient Appbcd (Ibs/A) Res, 0WA) AppGc. Method Manure PA Nutrient Applied Obs/A) Liquid ManurcA ppiied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (sae) Liquid Manure Applied (Field) Solid Manure Applied (Field) IN IN IN N 1000 ga11A Tons 1000 gals tons 1896-E f4p14 S7 Norfolk 3.79 3.79 Wheat, Grain, 60 bu. 9/1-4/30 125 0 0 brig. 75 29.96 0.00 113.54 0.00 1896-I1 f4p15 S7 Norfolk 338 3.38 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10113/3I *30 0 0 Irrig. 18 7.19 0.00 24.30 0.00 1896-II ApI5 57 Norfok: 3.38 3.38 Cum, Grain 115 bu. 2/15-6130 131 0 *40 Irrig. 91 36.35 0.00 122.86 0.00 1896-A Ap15 S7 Norfolk 3.38 3.38 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 911-4/30 M 0 0 brig. 75 29.96 0.00 I01.26 O.DO 1896-11 f4p16 S7 Norfolk 4.65 4.65 Small Grain Oversced 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 *30 0 0 Irrig. 18 7.19 0.00 33.43 0.00 1896-11 f4p16 S7Norfolk' 4,65 4.65 Com, Grain 115 bu. 2/15-6130 131 0 *40 Irrig. 91 36.35 0.00 169,02 0.00 189641 f4p16 S7 Norfolk 4.65 4.65 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1.4/30 125 0 4 1 Irrig. 75 29,96 0.00 139.31 0.00 1896-II f4p17 S7 Norfoik 4.56 4.56 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/13/31 *30 0 0 Irrig. 1S ?.19 0.00 32.79 0.00 IS96-Il f4pI7 I S7 Norfolk 4.56 4.56 Corn, Grain 115 bu. 2/15.&30 131 0 *40 Irrig. 91 36.35 0.00 165.75 0.00 1896-II f4p17 S7 orfolk 4.56 4.56 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4130 125 0 0 Irrig. 75 29.96 0.00 136.61 0.00 1896-II Ap1S S7 Norfolk 1.29 1.29 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 .30 0 0 Irrig, 18 7.19 0.00 917 0.00 1896-II Ap18 S7 Norfolk 1.29 1.29 Corn, Grain 115 bu. 2/15-6/30 131 0 •40 Irrig. 9I 36.35 0.00 46,89 0.00 1396-II f4p18 S7 Norfolk 1.29 1.29 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4/30 125 0 0 ltrig. 75 29.96 OAO 38.65 0.00 IS96-13 f4pl.9 S7Norfolk- 1.14 1.14 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 *30 0 0 brig. 13 7,191 0,00 3.20 0.00 1896-H Ap19 S7 Norfolk 1.14 1.14 Com, Grain 115 bu. 2115-00 131 0 *40 Irrig. 91 36.35 0.00 41.44 o.00 i 1396-11 Ap19 S7 Norfolk 1.14 1.14 Wheat, Cmin 60 bu. 9/1-4130 125 0 0 Inig, 75 29.96 0.00 34,15 0,00 IS96-II f4p20 S7 Norfolk 1.35 1.35 Small Grain Ovetseed 1.0 Tons 10/1 3/3l *30 0 0 Frig 18 7.19 0.001 9.71 0.00 1896-II f4p20 S7 Norfolk I.35 1.35 Com, Grain 115 bu. 2/15-650 131 0 *40 1 Irrig. 91 36.35 0.00 49.07 0.00 IS96-II f4p20 S7 Norfolk 1.35 1.3$ Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-450 125 0 0 Irrig. 75 29.96 0.00 4GA4 0.00 1896-II f4p2i S7 Norfaik 1.52 1.52 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 "Tons 1011-3/31 °30 0 0 Irrig. 18 7.19 0.00 10.93 0.00 1996-II f4p21 S7 Norfolk 1.52 1.$2 Com, Grain 115 bu. 2/15-6)30 131 1 0 *40 brig. 91 36.35 0,00 55.25 0.00 1996-II f4p21 57 orfolk 1.52 1.52 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 1 9/1-4130 125 1. 0 0 Irrig_ 75 29.96 0.00 45.54 0.00 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 WUT Page 4 of 13 Waste Utilization Table Year I Tract Field Source 1p Soil Series Total Acres Use. Acres Crop RYF Applic. Period Nitruser, PA Nutrient Rego (4bs'A) Comm Fert. Nutrient Applied 0bs/A) Res, Qbs/A) Applic. Metbod Manure PA Nutrient Applied bsZA) Liquid ManurrA ppfier: (acre) Solid Manure AppVCd (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Field) Solid Manure Applied (Field) 1\ N N i000 grl/A Tons 1000 gals tons 1396-E f5p40 S7 Autryville 3.67 3.67 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Inig. 50 19.97 0.00 73.30 0.00 2896-11 f5p40 S7 Autryville 3,67 3.67 Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 5.5 Tons *3l1-10/31 202 0 0 Irrig, 202 80.69 0.00 296.12 0.00 1896-II f5p41 S7 utryrille 1.67 1.67 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/3) SO 0 0 brig. 50 19.97 0.00 33.35 0.00 1896-1I f5p41 S7 Autryville 1.67 1.67 Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 5.5 Tons *3/1-10/31 202 0 0 brig 202 80.69 0.00 134.75 0.00 1896-iI f5p42 S7 Autcyviila 3.92 3,92 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10I1-351 50 0 0 Irrig. 50 19.97 0.00 78.29 0.00 1396-11 f5p42 S7 Autryvillo 3.92 3.92 Hybrid Sermudagrass Pasture 5,5 Tons *3/1-10M 202 0 0 brig. 202 80,69 0.00 316.29 0.00 1896-11 f5p43 S7 Auuyville 2.01 2.01 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Irrig. 50 19,97 0.00 40.14 0.00 1896-11 f5p43 S7 Aut yville 101 2.01 Hybrid Bermudagram Pasture 5.5 Tons *3/1-10/31 202 0 0 Irrig 202 80,69 0.00 162.13 0.00 1396-II f5p44 S7 Auvyvilic 4.03 4.03 small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons I0/1-3f31 5C C 0 Irrig. 50 I9.97 0.00 80.49 0.00 1896-II f5p44 S7 Autryville 4.03 4.03 Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 5.5 Tons *3/1-10131 202 0 0 Irrig. 202 80.69 0.00 325,17 0.00 1896-11 f5p45 S7 Autryville 2.19 2.19 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/3) 50 0 0 Irrig 1 50 19.97 0.00 43.74 0.00 1896-U f5p45 S7 Autryville 2.19 2,19 Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 5.5 Tons *3/1-10/3I 202 0 0 Irrig. 202 80.69 0.00 176.71 0.00 1896-11 f6p33 S7 Norfolk 1.27 1.27 Snell Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 50 0 0 Irrig, 50 19.97 0.00 25.37 0100 1896-II f6p33 S7[Norfolk 1.27 1.27 Hybrid Bermudapggrass Hay 6.5 Tons *3/1-10/31 296 1 0 0 1 Irrig. 296 11824 0.00 150_I6 0.00 1896-II f6p34 S7 Norfolk I.99 1.99 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 1 T rig 50 19.97 0.00 39.74 0.00 1896-11 f6p34 S7 Norfolk 1.99 1.99 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 6.5 Tons *311-10131 296 0 0 Irrig. 296 118.24 0.00 235.29 0.00 1896-II f6p35 S7 Norfolk, 2.46 2.46 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3/3I 50 0 0 brig 501 19.97 0.00 49.13 0.00 1896-II f6p35 S7 Norfolk 2.46 2,46 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 6.5 Tons *3/1-10133 1 296 0 0 Irrig. 296 118.241 0,001 290.86 0.00 1896-H f7p46 S7 Autryville. 4.13 4.13 Sma11 Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 1 *30 0 1 0 krig. 18 7,19 0.00 29.69 0.00 1896-11 f7p46 57 Autryville 4.13 4,13 Corn, Grain 85 bu. 2115-00 104 0 *40 Irrig. 64 25.56 0.00 105.58 0.00 1896-11 f7p46 S7 Autryville 4.13 4.13 Wheat, Grain 45 bu. 9/1-4/30 104 0 0 1brig 62 24.93 - 0.00 102.94 0.00 1896-i1 f7p47 S7 Autryville 1.31 1.31 Small Grain Overseed LO Tons 10/1-3r 1 *30 0 0 brig. 18 7.19 0.00 9.42 0.00 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 WUT Page 5 of 13 Waste Utilization Table Vt+ar 1 Tract Field Source ID Soil Series Total Acres Use. Acres Crop, RYE Applic, Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd abs/A) Comm. Fert. Nutrient Applied (bsrA) Res, Qbs/A) Applic, Method 1vlanure PA Nutrient Applied (1bs/A) 1,iquid Maaw--A pplied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) -Liquid Manure Applied (Field) Solid Manure Applied (Field) N N N N 1000 gaVA Tons 1000 gals tons 1896-II 17p47 S7 Autryville 1.31 1.31 Corn, Grain 85 bu. 2115-6/30 104 0 •40 brig. 64 25.56 0,00 33.49 0.00 1896-I1 f7p47 S7 Autryville 1.31 1.31 Wheat, Grain 45 bu. 911-4/30 104 0 0 brig, 62 24,93 0.00 32.65 0.00 1896-U f7p48 S7 Auuyvillc 2.68 2.68 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 *30 0 0 brig. 18 7.19 0.00 19.27 0.00 1896-II f7p4S S7 kutryville 2.68 2,68 Com, Grain 85 bu. 2115-6/30 104 1 0 1 *40 Irrig. 64 25.56 0.00 68.511 0.00 1896-I1 f7p48 S7 Autryville 2.68 2.68 Wheat, Grain 45 bu. 9/1-4130 104 0 0 brig. 62 24.93 0.00 66.80 O.00 1896-H f7p49 S7 Autryvillc 0.75 0.75 Sma11 Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 *30 0 0 Irrig 18 7.19 0.00 5.39 0.00 189611 f7p49 S7 Autryvibe 0.75 0.75 Corn, Grain 85 bu. 2/15-6r0 1 104 0 *40 Irrig, 64 25.56 0.001 19.17 0.00 1896-II 17p49 S7 Autryvillc 0.75 0.75 Wheat, Grain 45 bu 9/1-4/30 344 0 0 brio, 62 24.93 C.00 18.69 0.00 1896-II f7p5O S7 Autryville 2.16 2.16 ,Small Grain Oversecd 2.0 Tons I0/1-3/31 *30 0 0 brig. 18 7.19 0.00 15.53 0.00 1896-A f7p50 S7 Autryville 2.16 2.16 Corn, Grain 85 bu. 2/15-6/30 104 0 *40 irrig. 64 25.56 0.00 55.22 0.00 1396-II f7p50 S7 Autryville 2.16 2.16 Wheat, Grain 45 bu. 9/1-4130 104 0 0 Irrig. 62 24.93 0.00 53.84 0.00 1396-IT f8p36 S7 Autryville 1,33 1.33 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 brig. 1 50 19,97 0.00 26.56 0.00 1896-1T %p36 S7 Autryville 1.33 1.33 Hybrid Bermuda,-;=s Hay 5.5 Tons *311-10/31 269 0 0 Irrig. 269 107.45 0.00 142.91 0.00 1896-11 fSp37 S7 Aub)vilie 1.73 1.73 Small Grain Overseed 1.OTons 1011-3131 50 0 0 brig, 50 19.97 0.00 34.35 0.00 189641 f8p37 S7 Autryville 1.73 1.73 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons *311-1061. 269 1 0 0 Irrig. 269 107.45 0.00 185.89 0.00 1896-II f3p38 S7 Autryville 1,73 1.73 Small Grain Overseed I.0 Tons 10/1-351 50 0 0 Irrig. 50 19,97 0.00 34.55 0.00 1896.9 f8p38 S7 Autryville 1.73 1.73 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5,5 Tons *3/1-10/31 269 C 0 Irrig. 269 107.45 0.00 185.89 0.00 1896-Il f3p39 S7 Autryville 1.64 1.64 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Toas 10/1 3/31 50 0 0 brig 50 19.97 0.00 32.75 0.00 1396-II f8p39 S7 Auvyvil[e 1,64 1.64 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tans •3/1-10/31 269 0 0 brig. 269 107.45 0.00 I76?2 I 0.00 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 WUd' Page 6 of 13 Waste Utilization Table Year i Tract Field Bourse 1p Soil Series Tcre1 Acres Use. Acres Crop p RYE Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Re4d (ibs/A) Comm Fert. Nutrient Applied (lbs1A) Res. (1bs/A) Me hod Manure PA Nutrient Applied (Ibs%) Liquid MwurcA ppliicd (acre) Solid Manure Applied %acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Field) solid Lanus Applied (Field) 1\ N N � aUA � Tons 1000 s � tons Total Applied, I000 gallons 11,004.40 Total Produced, 1000 gallons 10,679.0 Balance, €000 gallons -325.36 Total Applicd, tons 0.00 Total Produced, toots 0.00 Balancc, tons 0.00 Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data. 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 WUT Page 7 of 13 Waste Utilization Table Year 2 Tract Field Source ID Soil Series Toral Acres Use. Acres Crop RYE AAPbG Period Nitrcgen PA Nutrient Rogd QbsrA) Ca= Fert. Nutrient Applied pbsrA) Res. (1bs/A) Applic. Method Marlure PA Nutrient Applied (1bsiA} liquid ManureA pplied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) liquid Manure Applied (Field) Solid Manure Applied (Field) N N N N i000 gal1A Tons 1000 gals tons 1896-11 flp5 SiNorfolk- 1.98 1.98 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 brig. 50 19.97 0.00 39.55 0.00 1896-11 flpS S7 Norfolk 1.98 1.98 Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 6.5 Tons *3/1-10131 222 0 0 Ierig. 222 S8.68 0.00 175.58 0.00 1896-G flp6 $7 Norfolk 6.06 6.06 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons I0/1-3/3I 50 0 0 brig, 50 19.97 0.00 121.03 0.00 1896-11 flp6 S7 Norfolk 6.06 6.06 Hybrid Bcrmudagrass Pasture 6.5 Tons *311-10/3I 222 0 0 Irrig. 222 88.68 0.00 537.38 0.00 1896-H 110 S7 Norfolk 4.86 4.86 Small Grain Ovm=d 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 50 0 0 Irrig. 50 19.97 0.00 97.06 0.06 1896-n flp7 S7 Norfolk 4.86 4.86 hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 6.5 Tons *3/1-10/31 222 0 0 brig. 222 88,68 0.00 430.97 0.00 IS96-II fIP8 S7 Norfolk 4.30 4.30 Small Grain Oversced 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 50 0 0 Frip, 50 19,97 0,00 $5.88 0.00 1896-I1 flpS S7 Norfolk 4.30 4.30 Hybrid Bermudagracs Pasture 6.5 Tons *3/1-10/31 222 0 0 Irig. 222 88.68 0.00 381.31 0.00 1896-II flp9 S7 Norfolk 3.04 3.04 Small Grain Ovcrseed 1.0 Tons INI-3/31 50 0 0 Irrig 50 19.97 0.00 60.72 0,00 1896-I1 flp9 S7 Norfolk 3.04 3.04 Hybrid Berrnudagrass Pasture 6.5 Tons 13/1-10/31 222 0 9 Irrig. 222 88.68 0.00 269.58 0,00 1896-11 f2p31 S7 Norfolk 0.43 0.43 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3131 *30 0 *0 brig, 12 4.79 0.001 2.06 - 0.00 1896-II (201 S7 Norfolk 0.43 0.43 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4/30 125 0 1 0 brig SD 19.47 0.00 3.59 0,00 189641 11201 S7 Norfolk, 0.43 0.43 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-945 137 0 *10 Irrig. 127 50.73 0.00 21.81 0.00 1896-II 12p32 S7 Norfolk 0,70 0,70 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3131 •30 0 .00 Irrig, 12 4.79 0.00 3.36 0.00 1896.11 P-p32 S7 Norfolk 0.70 0.70 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4/30 125 0 0 Irrig. 50 19.97 0.00 13.98 0.00 1896-II P-p32 S7 Norfolk 0.70 0.70 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 411-9/15 137 4 1 *10 Irrig. 1 127 50.73 0.00 35.51 0.00 1896-II f3p22 I S7 Norfolk 3,08 3.08 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 *30 0 *0 LTig. 12 4.79 0.001 14.76 0.00 1896-II f3p22 S7 Norfolk 3.05 3.08 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 911-4130 125 0 0 Irrig. 50 19.97 0.00 61.51 0.00 1896-11 13p22 S7 Norfolk 3,08 3.08 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu_ 411-9115 137 0 * 10 brig. 127 50.73 0.00 15625 0.00 1896-r f3p23 S7 Norfolk 1.55 I.55 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 '30 0 *0 Irrig. 12 4.79 0.00 7,43 0.00 1896-111 Bp?3 S7 Norfolk 1.55 1.55 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/14/30 125 0 0 "& 50 19.97 0.00 30.96 0,00 1896-II f3p23 I S7 Norfolk 1.55 1.55 Soybeans, Maaured, Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 137 0 * 10 Irrig. 127 50.73 OAO -18.631 0.00 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 WLTT Page 8 of 13 Waste Utilization Table Year 2 Tract Field Source ID Soil Series Acre Acres Use. Aces Crop p RYE Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd pbslA) Cantu Fert. Nutrient Applied O bs/A) Res, (1b5/A) M pdhod Manure PA Nutrient Applied 0 bs1A) Liquid ManumA pplied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied tFicld) Solid Manure Applied (Field) N 1\ N N al/A >� Tons 1000 s 8� tons 1896-II f3p24 S7 Nwfolk 127 1.27 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 *30 0 *0 Irrig 12 4.79 0.00 6.09 0.00 1,396-11 f3p24 57 Norfolk 127 1.27 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4130 125 0 0 Irrb. 50 19.97 0.00 25.36 0.00 1896-11 Op24 S7 Norfolk 1.27 1,27 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 411-9135 137 0 010 Irrig 127 50.73 0.00 64.43 0.00 1896-1I f3p24A S7 Norfolk 1.27 1.27 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 *30 0 1 "0 Irrig 1 12 4.791 0.001 6.09 0.00 1896-11 f3p24A S7 Norfolk 1.27 1.27 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4130 125 0 0 Irrig. 50 19.97 0.00 25.36 0.00 1896-11 Sp24A S7 Norfolk 1.27 1.27 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 137 0 *10 Irrig. 127 50.73 0.00 64.43 0.00 1896-11 f3p25 S7 Norfolk 2.62 2.62 Small Crain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 *30 0 *0 Irrig, 12 4.79 0.00 12.56 0.00 1896-13 f3p2S S7 Norfolk 2,62 2,62 Wheat, Grain 60 bu, 9/1-450 125 0 1 0 ]Trig. 1 50 19.97 0.00 52.33 0.00 1896-11 f3p25 S7 Norfolk 2.62 2.62 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9115 137 0 *I0 Irrig. 127 50.73 0.00 132.91 0.00 1996-11 £ip26 S7 Norfolk 2.93 2.93 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 430 0 40 Irrig, 12 4.79 0.00 14.04 0.00 1896-11 f3p26 S7 Norfolk 2.93 2.93 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4/30 125 0 0 Irrig. 50 19.97 0.00 58.52 0.00 1896-H f3p26 S7 Norfolk 2.93 2.93 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 411-9/15 137 0 *10 Irrig. 127 50.73 0.00 148.64 0.00, 1896-U Sp27 S7 Norfolk 4.10 4.10 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 *30 0 *0 Irrig. 12 4.79 0.00 19.65 0.001 1896-11 f3p27 S7 Norfolk 4,10 4.1.0 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 911 4/30 125 0 0 Irrig, 50 19.97 0.00 S1,89 0.00 1896-E f3p27 S7 Norfolk 4.10 4.10 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 411-9/15 137 0 *10 Irrig. 127 50.73 0.00 207.99 0.00 IS96-11 f3p28 S7 Norfolk 4.10 4.10 Small Grain Overseed 2.0Tons 10/1-3/31 *30 0 *0 Irrig. 1 4.79 0.00 19.65 0.00 1896-D f3p28 S7 Norfolk 4.10 4.I0 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 911-4 30 i25 0 0 1 Irrig, 50 19.97 0.00 81.89 0.00 1896-11 f3p28 S Norfolk 4.10 4.10 Soybeans, Manned, Double Crop 35 bu. 4/I-9/15 137 0 *10 Inig. 127 50.73 0.00 207.99 0.00 IS96-11 f3p29 S7 Norfolk' 4.18 4.18 Small Grain Overseed I.0 Tons 10/I-3131 430 0 *0 Irrig. l2 4.79 0.00 20.04 0.00 1896-H Op29 S7 Norfolk 4.18 4.18 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 911-00 125 0 0 Irrig. 501 19.97 0.00 83.48 0.00 1896-11 Bp29 S7 Norfolk 4.18 4.18 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9A5 137 0 *10 Irrig. I27 50.73 0.00 212.05 0.00 I S96-31 BOO S7 INorfbIk 4,59 4.59 Small Grain Ovetseed 1.0 Tolls 10/1-3/31 *30 0 *0 brig, 12 4.79 0.00 22.00 0.00 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 WIJT Page 9 of 13 Waste Utilization Table Year 2 Tract Field Source ID 1 Soil Scries Total Acres Use. Acres Crop RYE Applic. Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Rogd (]bs/A) Canm Fert. Nutrient Applied Qbs/A) Ras. Qbs/A) Applic. M.cftd Manure PA Nutrient Applied abs/A) Liquid M..anureA pp2cd (a-) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Field) Solid Manure Appied (Field) N N N N low gai/A Tons 1000 gals tons 1896-II f3p30 S7 Norfolk 4.59 4.59 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4/30 125 0 0 brig. 50 19.97 0.00 91.67 0.00 1896-II f3p30 S7 Norfolk 4.59 4.59 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1.9/15 137 0 *10 brig I27 50.73 0.00 232.85 0.00 1896-II Ap10 57 Autryville 4.36 4.36 Small Crain Overseed lA Tons 10/1-3/31 *30 0 0 brig. 12 4.79 0.001 20.90 0.00 1896-U f4p10 S7 lAutryvillc 4.36 4.36 Wheat, Grain 45 bu. 9/1-4/30 104 0 Q brig. 42 16.62 0.00 72.45 0.00 1896-11 Ap10 S7 Autryville 4.36 4.36 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 25 bu. 4/1-9/l5 100 0 *10 brig, 90 35.95 0,00 156,74 0.00 1896-II f4p11 S7 Autryville 4.39 4.39 Small Grain Ovwmd 1.0 Tons 10/1-3r 1 *30 0 ' O Irrig. 12 4.79 0,00 21-041 0.00 1896-II f4pl l S7 Autryville 4.39 4.39 Wheat, Grain 45 bu. 9/1-4/30 104 D 1 0 Irrig. 1 43 L6.62 0,00 72.95 0.00 1896-11 f4pl I S7 Autryville 4.39 4.39 Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop 25 bu. 4/1-9115 100 0 *10 brig. 90 35.95 0.00 157.82 0.00 1896-11 f4p]2 S7 Atitsyville 4.31 4.31 Small Grain Ovcrseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-351 *30 0 *0 Irrig, 12 4.79 0.00 20.66 0.00 I896-II f4p12 $7 Auoyville 4.31 4.31 Wheat, Grain 45 bu. 9/1-4/;0 1 104 0 0 Irrig. 42 16.62 0.00 71.62 0.00 IS96-II f4p12 S7 Autryvillc 431 4.31 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 25 bu. 4/1-9/15 100 0 1 *10 . brig. 90 35.95 0.00 154.94 0.00 1896-IL Ap13 S7 jAutryville 3.241 3.24 Small Grain Oversccd 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 *30 0 "0 brig. L2 4.79 0,00 15.53 0.00 1896-11 f4p13 S7 Autryville 3.24 3.24 Wheat, Grain 45 bu. 9lt-4130 104 0 0 brig. 42 16,62 0.00 53.84 0.00 1896-II f4p13 S7 Autryville 3.24 3.24 Soybeans, Manured, double Crop 25 bu. 4/1 9/15 100 0 *10 brig, 90 35.95 0.00 116.48 0.00 1896-11 Ap14 S7 Norfolk 3,79 3.79 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tans 10/1-3/31 1 *30 0 *0 Irrig. 12 4.79 0.00 18.17 0.00 1896-1I f4p14 $7 Norfolk 3.79 3.79 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 911-4/30 125 0 0 irrie. 50 19,97 0.00 75.69 0.00 1896-II f4pA S7 Norfolk 3.79 3.79 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 137 0 *10 Irrig. 127 50.73 0.00 192.26 0.00 1996-U f4p15 S7 Norfolk 3,39 3.38 Small Crain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 *30 0 *0 Irrig. 12 4.74 0.00 16.20 0.00 IS96-II Ap15 S7 Norfolk 3.38 338 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4/30 1 125 0 1 0 Irrig. 50 19.97 0.00 67.51 0.00 1996-11 f4p15 S7 Norfolk 3.33 3.38 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 137 0 *10 brig 127 50.73 0.00 171.46 0.00 1896-II f4p16 S7Norfolk' 4.65 4.b5 Small Grain Overseed l.O Tons 10/13/31 *30 0 *0 Irrig, 12 4.79 0,00 22.29 0.00 1$96-11 f4plb S7 INorfolk 4.65 4.65 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4/30 125 0 0 1 brig 54 19.97 0.04 92.87 0,00 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 WUT Page 10 of 13 Waste Utilization Table Year 2 Tract Field Source ID Soil Series Total Acres Use. Acres Crop RYE AppUe. Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd 0bs/A) Comm Fert. Nutricrr Applied Obs/A) Res. Obs/A) Appia Method Mmum PA Nutrient Applied (Ibs/A) Liquid MmureA pplied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (a-) liquid Manure Applied (Reid) Solid Mangy Applied (Field) N N N N 1000 gai1A Tons 1000 gals tons ] S96-II f4p16 57 orfolk 4.65 4.65 Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/25 137 0 -a brig. 12 50.73 0.00 235.89 0.00 1896-E f4p17 S7 Norfolk 4.56 4.56 Small Grain Overseed 1,0 Tons 1011-3/31 "30 0 *0 Irrig. 12 4.79 0.00 21.86 0.00 1896-II Ap17 S7 Norfolk 4.56 4.56 Whes>; Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4r30 12.5 0 0 brig. 50 19.97 0.00 91.07 0.00 1896-11 Ap17 S7 Norfolk 4.56 4.56 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 1 137 0 *10 Irrig. 1 1271 50.73 0.00 231.32 0.00 1896-11 Ap18 S7 Norfolk 1.29 1.29 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3f31 *30 0 *0 brig. 12 4.79 OAO 6.18 0.00 1896-II f4p18 S7 Norfolk 1.29 1.29 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4/30 125 0 0 brig. 50 19.97 0,00 25.76 0.00 1896-11 f4piS S7 Norfolk 1.29 129 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1 A/15 137 0 *10 Irrig. 127 50.73 0.00 65.44 0.00 1896-1I Ap19 S7 Norfolk 1.14 1,14 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 30 0 *0 Irria 1 12 4.79 0.00 5.46 0.00 1896-11 f4p19 S7[Norfolk 1.14 1.14 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1.4/30 125 0 0 Irrig, 54 19.97 0.00 22.77 0.00 1896-11 f4p19 S7 Norfolk 1.14 1,14 Soybeans, Maramd, Double Crop 35 btu 4/1-9/15 1 137 0 *10 Irrig. 127 50.73 0,00 57.83 0.00 1896-II f4p20 S7 Norfolk 1.35 1,35 Small Grain Ovcrsmd 1.0 Tons I O/I-3f31 *30 1 0 *0 brig. 12 4.79 0.00 6,47 0.00 1896-1I f4p20 S7[Nor-folk 1.35 1.35 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4 30 125 0 0 Irrig. 50 19.97 0.00 26.96 0.00 1896-11 Ap20 S7 Norfolk 1.35 1.35 Soybeans, Marrured, Double Crop 35 bu. 411-9115 137 0 *10 Irrig. 127 50.73 0.00 63.48 0.00 1896-II f4p21 S7Norfolk' 1.52 1.52 Small Grain Ovcssmd 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 •30 0 *0 brig. 12 4.79 0.001 7.29 0.00 1896-II f4p21 S7 Norfolk 1.62 1.52 Wheat, Grain 60 bu. 9/1-4/30 125 0 0 Irrig. 50 19.97 0.00 30,36 0.00 1896-Il Ap21 S7Norfolk' 1.52 1.52 Soybeans,Man.,4 Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9115 137 0 *10 Irrig. 127 50.73 0.00 77,111 0.00 1896-II i5p40 S7 Autryville 3.67 3.67 Sma11 Grain.Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3BI 50 0 0 Irrig, 50 19.9 0.00 73,30 0.00 1896-II f5p40 S7 Autryville .3.67. 3.67 Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 5.5 Tons *311-10/31 202 0 0 Irrig 202 80.69 0,00 296.12 0.00 1 S96-U f5p41 S7 Autyville 1.67 1.67 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 50 1 0 0 brig. 50 19.97 0.00 33.35 0,00 1896-II E5p41 S7 tryville 1,67 1.67 Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 5.3 Tons *3/1-10/31 202 0 0 brig. 202 80.69 0.00 134.75 0.00 1896-11 f5p42 S7 Aurryville 3.92 3.92 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 50 0 0 Irrig, 50 19.97 0.00 73.29 0.00 1896-I1 81>42 S7 jAutyoille 3.92 3.92 Hybrid Bermudagracs Pasture 5.5 Tons *3/1-I0/31 202 0 0 1 Irrig. 202 80.69 0.00 316.29 0.00 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 '4VCJ"1' Page 11 of 13 Waste Utilization Table Year 2 Tract Field Source fD Soil Series Toral Acres Use. Acres Crop RYE Applic Period itrogen PA Nutrient Req'd (Ibs/A) Ccrom Fert. Nutrient Applied Qbs/A) Res, (lbs/A) Applic. Metind Manw-c PA Nutrient Applied (ibs�A) Liquid ManureA pphed (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Fieid) Solid Manure Applied (Fiid) N N N t loco gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 1896-R bp43 S7 Autryville 2.01 2.01 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 brig, 50 19.97 0,00 40.14 0.00 1896-D f5p43 S7 Autryv'11e 2.01 2.01 Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 5.5 Tons *3/1-10/31 202 0 0 Irrig. 202 80.69 0.00 162.15 0.00 1896-11 f5p44 S7 Autryvillr 4.03 4.03 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 50 0 0 Irrig. 50 19.97 0.00 80.49 0.00 1896-11 f5p44 S7 Autryville 4.03 4.03 Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 5.5 Tons *3/1-10131 202 0 0 Irrig. 1 202 80.69 0,00 325.17 0.00 1896-11 f5p45 S7 Aut yville 2.19 2.19 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10l1-3/31 50 0 0 hrig. 50 19.97 0.00 43.74 0.00 1896-11 f5p45 S7 Autryville 2,19 2.19 Hybrid Bermudas Pasture 5.5 Tons *311-I C/31 202 0 0 Irrig. 202 80.69 0.00 176.71 0.00 1896-11 f6p33 S7 Norfatk 1.27 1,27 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3131 50 0 0 Irrig. 501 19.97 0,001 2537 0.00 1396-D f6p33 S7 Norfolk I.27 1.27 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 6.5 Tons *3/1-10/31 296 0 0 brig. 296 118.24 0.00 150.16 0.00 1396-D f5p34 S7 Norfolk I.99 1.99 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1017-3/31 50 0 0 Irrig. 50 1997 0.00 39.74 0.00 1896-D f6p34 S7 Norfolk 1,99 1.99 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 6.5 Tons 03/1-10/311 296 0 0 Irrig. 296 118.24 0.00 235.29 0,00 1896-D f6p35 S7 Norfolk 2.46 2.46 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3131 50 0 0 hTig 1 50 19.97 0.00 49,13 0,00 1896-11 f6p35 S7 orfb&- 2.46 2.46 Hybrid Bermudagracs Hay 6.5 Tons *3/1-10/31 296 0 1 0 Irrig. 296 118.24 0.00 290.86 0.00 1896-I1 f7p46 S7 Autryvillc 4.13 4.13 Small Crain Oversced I.0 Tons 101I-3131 1130 0 *0 Irrig. 12 4.79 0.00 19.80 0.00 1996-11 f7p46 S7 Autryville 4.13 4.13 Wheat, Grain 45 bu. 9/1-480 104 0 0 brig. 42 16.62 0.00 68.63 0.00 1896-11 f7p46 S7 Autryvillc 4.13 4.13 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 25 bu. 411-9/15 100 0 *10 brig 1 90 35.95 0.00 148.47 0.00 1896-D f7p47 S7 Autryville 1.31 1.31 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-351 *30 1 0 *0 Irrig. 12 4.79 0.00 6,28 0.00 189641 f7p47 S7Autryville- 1.31 1.31 Wheat, Crain 45 bu, 911-4/30 104 0 0 Irrig. 42 16.62 0.00 21.77 0.00 1896-11 f7p47 $7 Autryyille 1.31 1.31 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 25 bu. 4/1-9115 100 0 *10 Irrig. 90 35.95 a.00 47.09 0.00 1896-17 f7p48 S7 AutrydIc 2.63 2.68 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3131 •30 0 *0 irrig. I 4.79 0.00 12.85 0.00 1896-D f7p48 S7 Autryviilc 2.68 2.68 Wheat, Grain 45 bu, 9/14/30 104 0 0 Irrig. 42 16.62 0.00 44.53 0.00 1896-n f7p48 S7 Autryville 2.68 2.68 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 25 bu. 1 411-9/15 too 0 *10 Irrig. 90 35.951 0.00 96.35 0.00 1896-1I f7p49 I S7 tryville 0.75 0.75 Small Grain Oversced 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 *30 0 *0 Irrig. 12 4.79 0.00 3.59 0.00, 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 WUT Page 12 of 13 Waste utilization Table Year 2 Tract Field Source ID Soil Series Total Acres use. Acres Crop RYE Applie, " Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd 0WA) Cantu Fart. Nutrient Applied 0WA} I Res. (lbs/A) Applic. Metlud Manure PA Nutrient Applied (lbss/A) Liquid ManurrA pplied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) laquid Manure Applied (Fieli) Solid Man= Applies (Field) N N N N 1000 gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 1896-11 f7p49 S7 Autxyville VS 0.75 Wheal, Grain 45 bu. 9/1-4M 104 0 0 Irrig. 42 16.62 0,00 12.46 0.00 1896-1I flp49 S7 Autryviile 0.75 0.75 Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop 25 bu. 4/1-9/15 100 0 *10 Inig. 90 35,95 U)O 26.96 OAO 1896-B f7p50 S7 Autyvihe 2.16 2.16 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tans 1011-3131 *30 0 *0 Irrig. 12 4.79 0.00 1035 0.00 1896-E f7p50 S7 tryville 2,16 2.16 'Wheat, Grain 45bu. 9/14/30 1 104 1 0 0 1 Irrig. 42 16.62 O.00 35.89 O.00 1896-E f7p50 S7 Autr}vil.le 2.16 2.16 Soybeans, Manumd, Double Crop 25 bu. 411-9/15 100 0 1110 brio. 90 35.95 0.00 77.65 0.00 1896-U fSp36 S7 Autryville 1.33 1.33 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 50 0 0 Irri ;. 50 19.97 0.00 26.56 0.00 1896-E f8p36 S7 AutrYville 1,331 1.33 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons *3/1-10131 1 269 0 0 lsrig. 1 269 1 G7.451 0.00 142.911 0.00 1896-11 f8p37 S7 lAutryVille, 1,73 1.73 Small Grain Overseed i.0 Tons 1011-3/31 50 1 0 0 brig 50 19.97 0,00 34.55 0.00 1896-U f8p37 S7 Aurryviile 1.73 1.73 Hybrid Bcrmudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons *3/1-1013I 269 0 1 0 1rrig. 269 107.45 0.00 185.89 0.00 1896.1I f8p38 S7 Au"ille 1.73 1.73 Small Grain Overseed I.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 1 brig. 501 19.97 0.001 34.55 0.00 1896-II f8p38 S7 Aut yville 1.73 1.73 Hybrid Bermadagrass Hay 5.5 Tons '311-101311 269 0 0 Irrig. 269 107,45 0.00 185.89 0.00 1896-11 21)39 S7 lAutrYville 1,64 1.64 Small Grain Oycrsecd 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 brig 50 19.97 0.00 32.75 0.00 1896-11 f8p39 S7 Autryville 1.64 1.64 Hybrid Berm,dagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 43/1-10/31 269 0 0 irrig. 269 107.45 0.00 176.22 0.00 Total Applied, 1000 gallons 11,100.5 Total Produced, 1000 gallons 10,679.04 Balance, 1000 gallons -421.48 Total Applied, tons 0.00 Total Produced, tons 0.0 Balance, tons 0.00 Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise. owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data. 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/'?015 WLtT Page 13 of 13 The Iurigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one application event. Iffigation Application Factors Tract Field Soil Series Application Rate (incheshiour) Application Amount (inches) 1896-1I flp5 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-II flp6 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-I1 flp7 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-1I flp8 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-11 flp9 Norfolk 0.50 t.0 1896-11 f2p31 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-11 f2p32 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-11 f3p22 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-I1 f3p23 Norfolk 0.50 IA 1896-11 f3p24 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-11 f3p24A Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-II f3p25 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-11 f3p26 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-I1 f3p27 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 18964I f3p28 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-11 f3p29 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-11 f3p30 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-It f4p10 Autryville 0.60 1.0 1896-11 f4plI Autryville 0.60 1.0 1896-11 Mp12 utryville 1 0.60 1.0 1896-11 f4pi3 Autryvillo 0.60 1.0 1896-H f4pl4 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-11 f4p15 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-11 f4p16 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-1I f4p 17 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-1I f4p18 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-1I f4p 19 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-11 f4l)20 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-II f4p21 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-11 f5p40 Autryville 0.60 1.0 I896-1i f5p41 Autryville 0.60 1.0 1896-11 f5p42 Autryville 0.60 1.0 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed 7/10/2015 IAF Page I of 2 NOTE: Symbol a means user entered data. Irrigation Application Factors Tract Field Soil Series Application Rate (iuclteslhour) Application Amount (inches) 1896-I1 f5p43 Autryville 0.60 1.0 1896-11 Bp44 Autryville 0.60 1.0 1896-1I f5p45 Autryville 0.60 1.0 1896-11 fGp33 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-fl. f6p34 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-II f6p35 Norfolk 0.50 1.0 1896-i1 f1p46 Autryville 0.60 l.0 1896-11 f1p47 Autryville 0.60 1.0 1896-I1 f7p48 Autryville 0.60 1.0 1896-11 f7p49 Autryville 0.60 1.0 1896-11 f1p50 Autryville 0.60 1.0 1896-11 f8p36 Autryville 0.60 1.0 1896-I1 f8p37 Autryville 0.60 1.0 1896-11 f8p38 Autryville 0.60 1.0 1896-11 1 f8p39 Au"ille 0.60 1.0 885117 Database Version 4,1 Date Printed 7/1012015 IAF Page 2 of 2 NOTE: Svmbol * means user entered data. The Nutrient Management Recormendations table shown below ply)vides an aiuluaI summary of the nutrient management plan developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requi relnents and soil test results. The quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified. The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required al-no-ult. However, the quantity of other nutrients applied play exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized to nieet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations, additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen. Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 0 N (lbs/A) 11205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Ct (IWA) Lime (tons(A) Tract Field 1896-1[ f1p5 Req'd Nutrients 50 150 40 0 0 0 2 1 Acres App. Period 1.98 1011-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residuul 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 1.07rons 05-02.06 Manure 50 27 68 b 0 1 0 0 P Rcinoval Rating 151bslac. Low BALANCE 0 -123 28 6 0 1 -2 4 Tract Field 1896-11 fip6 Req'dNutrients 50 150 40 0 0 0 2 1 Acres App. Period 6.06 1011-3131 Suppiied By: CROP Small Grain Ovcrseed Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE, I Sample Date 1.0Tons 1 05-02-06 Manure 50 27 68 6 0 1 0 0 P Removal IRating Tract I Field 15 lbslac. 1896-11 Low flp7 BALANCE Req'd Nutrients 0 50 -123 150 28 40 6 0 0 0 1 0 -2 2 -1 1 Acres App. Period 4.96 3011-3131 Supplied 13y: CROP Sivall Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date L.0 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 50 27 68 6 0 1 0 0 P Removal Rating 15 Ibslac. Low BALANCE 0 -123 28 6 0 1 -2 -1 Tract IHeld 1896-11 f1p8 Req'd Nutrients 50 I50 40 0 0 0 2 1 Acres lApp. Period 4.30 10/1-3131 SuppliO By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Commercial Felt. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 1.0 "tons 05-02-06 A4anure 50 27 68 6 0 l 0 0 P Removal Rating 151bslac. Low BALANCE 0 [23 28 b 0 1 -2 1 885117 Database Version 4.1 Datc Printed: 7/10/2015 NMR Page 1 of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR Q N (lbs/A) P205 (Ibs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cyr (lbs/A) Lurie (tons/A) Tract Field 1896-Il flp9 Req'd Nutrients 50 150 40 0 0 0 2 1 Acres App. Period 3.04 1 10/1-3l31 Supplied By: CROP Small Graoi Overseed Stailcr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date I.0 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 50 27 68 6 0 1 0 0 P Removal I Rating 15 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 4 -123 28 61 0 1 -2 -f Tract I Field 1896-11 f2p31 Req'd Nuld [its *30 150 40 0 0 0 0 2 Acres App. Period 0.43 10/1-3131 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conmiercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sail Series Norfolk Residual *0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 RYE Sample Date 1.0'1'01tis 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 P Removal Rating IS lbs/ac. Law BALANCE 0 -134 1 4 0 1 0 -2 Tract Field 1896.11 t2p32 Req'd Nutrients 130 I50 40 0 0 0 0 2 Acres App. Period 0.70 10/1.3/31 Supplied By: CROt' Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYI; I Sample Date 1.0'1-ons 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1. 0 0 P Removal I Rating 15 lbslac. Law BALANCE 0 -134 1 4 0 1 0 -2 Tract Field 189G-11 f3p22 Req'd Nutrients •30 150 I0 0 0 0 2 1 Acres App. Period 3.08 10/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOIL Series Norfolk Residual °0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYF Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05.02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 01 0 P Rcmuval Rating 15 lbs/ac, Mcdium BALANCE 0 -134 31 4 0 1 -2 -1 Tract Field 1896-II t3p23 Rcq'dNutrients •30 150 10 0 0 0 2 1 Acres App, Period 1.55 1011-3131 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tuns 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 01 1 0 0 P Removal IRating 1511 Medium BALANCE? 1 fl -1341 31 4 0 1 -2 -1 885117 Database Version 4-1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 NMR Page 2 of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 0 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K2O (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) . Lime (tons/A) Tract Field 1896-11 f3P24 Req'd Nutrients *30 150 10 0 0 0 2 1 Acres App. Period 1.27 1 10/1-3/31 1 Supplied By; CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ConmtercialFert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Xforfolk Residual *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Samplc 17ate 1.0 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 P Removal Rating 15 lbs/ac- Medium BALANCE 0 -134t 31 4 1 0 1 -2 1 Tract I Field 1896-11 f3p24A Req'd Nutrients *30 150 l0 0 0 0 2 1 Acres App. Period 1.27 10/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date i .0 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 P Removal Rating 15 lbs/ac, Medium BALANCE 0 -134 31 4 0 1 -2 -1 'tract I Field 1896-H t3p25 Req'd Nutrients *30 150 10 0 0 0 2 1 Acres App, Period 2.62 10/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Nurfolk Residual •0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 1,0 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 P Removal Rating 15 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 -134 31 4 0 1 2 .1 Tract I Field 1896-11 13p26 Req'd Nutrients *30 150 10 0 0 0 2 1 Acres App. Period 2.93 10/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05.02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 P Removal Rating 15 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 -1341 31 4 0 1 -2 -1 Tract Field 1896-11 13p27 Req'd Nutrients *30 150 10 0 0 0 2 1 Acres App- Period 4.10 10/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 RYE Sample Date 1.0 Tons 1 05-02-06 Manure 30 t6 41 4 0 1 0 0 P Removal Rating 15 lbs/ue, Medium BALANCE 0 -134 31 4 0 1 -2 -t 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 XMR Page 3 of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 0 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mll (lbs/A) 7_11 (Ibs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lithe (tons/A) Tract Field 1896-11 1 f3p28 Req'd Nutrients 430 150 t6 0 0 0 2 1 Acres App. Period 4,10 1 loll-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05.02.06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 P Removal Baling I lbs/ac. M ediunt BALANCE 0 -134 31 4 0 1 2 4 Tract Field 1896-Q f3p29 Req'd Nutrients $30 150 10 0 0 0 2 1 Acres App. Period 4,18 1011-3/31 Supplied By: LROp Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sail Series Norfolk Residual *01 0 0 01 0 of 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 1 0 0 P Removal Rating 15 WSW. Miediurn BALANCE 0 -134 31 4 0 1 -2 -1 Traci Field 1896.11 f3p30 Req'd Nutrients *30 150 10 0 0 0 2 1 Acres App. Period 4.59 10l1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *0 0 0 0i 0 01 0 0 Sample Date 1,OTons 05-02.06 Manure 30 l6 41 4 0 t 0 0 val Rating 15lbslac. Mlediunr BALANCE 0 .134 31 4 0 I -2 -1 Field E 1896-11 . Ap10 Req'd Nutrients •30 150 0 0 0 0 2 2 App. Period 4.36 LOII-3131 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Felt. 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryvilic Residual r0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sample Date 1.0 Tcns 05.02.06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 Rating 15 Ibslac. .ow BALANCE 0 -134 41 4 D 1 -2 -2 ERcmuval Field 1896-11 Wp11 Req'd Nutrients *30 150 0 0 0 0 2 2 App. Period 4.39 1011-3131 Supplied By: CItOp Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sainple.Date 1.0'rons 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 P Renrovat I Rating 151bs/ac. ow BALANCE 0 -134 41 4 1 0 1 -2 -2 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 NMR Page 4 of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 0 N (1bs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) M i (lbs1A) 7-n (lbs/A) C11 (lbs/A) Lime (tonslA) Tract Field 1896.11 1 f4p12 Req'd Nutrients *30 150 0 0 0 0 2 2 Acres App, Period 4,3E 1 10/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 D 0 01 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 P Removal Rating 15 Ibslac, Low BALANCE D -134 41 4 0 1 -2 -2 Tract Field 1996-11 Mp13 Req'd Nutrients *30 150 0 0 0 01 2 2 Acres App, Period 3.24 1011-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grairr Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual *0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample hate 1.0 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 P Removal Rating Tract IField I lbs/ac. 1896-I1 Low Mp14 BALANCE Req'd Nutrients 0 *30 -134 1501 41 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 -2 21 -2 2 Acres App. Period .3.79 1011-3/3I Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 P Removal Ratbsg 15 Ibs/ao. Low BALANCE 0 -134 41 4 0 1 -2 -2 Tract I Field 1996-11 f4p15 Req'd Nutrients *30 1501 0 0 0 0 2 2 Acres App. Period 3,38 10/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 D Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 1Oj 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 PRemoval Rating t5lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -134 41 4 0 T 2 2 Tract Field 1896-11 f4p16 Req'd Nrutrients *30 150 0 0 01 0 2 2 Acres App. Period 4.65 10/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commerciall:eri. 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Dale 1.0 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 P Rentaval Rating 151bs1ac, Low BALANCE 0 -134 41 41 01 1 2 2 885117 Database Version 4.1 pate Printed: 7/1012015 NMR Page 5 of 32 Nutrient Management Reconmiendations Test YEAR 0 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (Ibs/A) Mn (lbs/A) . Zn (lbs/A) eat (IbsJA) Lime ((ans/A) Tract Field 1896-1I Ap17 Req'd Nutrients *30 150 0 0 0 0 2 2 Acres jApp. Period 4.56 1 10/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Pert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual • "0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05-02.06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 P Removal I Rating 15 lbslac. Low BALANCE 0 -134 41 41 0 1 -2 -2 Tract Field 1896-11 MPH Rcq'd Nutrients *30 ISO 0 0 0 0 2 2 Acres App. Period 1.29 10/I-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Comm ercialFert. 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 SoiI Series Norfolk Residual *0 10 0 0 0 01 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 41 0 1 0 0 P Removal IRating 15 lbs/ac. LOW BALANCE 0 -134 41 41 0 1 -2 -2 Tract I Field 1896-11 N09 Req'd Nutrients 030 150 0 0 0 0 21 2 Acres App. Period 1.14 10/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 01 0 01 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *0 0 0 0 0 DI 0 0 Sample Date 1.0Tons 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 Rating 15 lbs/ae. w BALANCE 0 -134. 41 4 0 1 -2 -2 ERPm,,oval Field 1896-I1 f4p2D Req'd Nutrients 430 150 0 D 0 0 2 2 App. Period 1.35 1011-3131 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Commercial Pert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *D 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 RYF Sample Date 1.0'Cals 05-U2-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 P Removal Rating 15 lbs/ao. Low BALANCE 0 -134 41 4 01 1 -2 -2 Tract Field 1896-i! Ap21 Req'd Nutrients +30 I50 D 0 0 0 2 2 Acres App. Period 1.52 10/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date I,0 Tons 1 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 P Removal I Rating 15 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -134 41 4 0 1 -2 -2 885117 Dalabase Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/1012015 NMR Page 6 of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 0 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) A] (lbs/A) 711 (lbs/A) Cu (Ibs/A) Lime (totlslA) Tract Field 1896-11 1 BOO Req'd Nutrients 50 150 60 0 0 0 2 2 Acres App- Period 3.67 1 10/1-3f31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 50 27 68 6 0 1 0 0 P Removal hating I S lbs/ae. Low BALANCE 0 .123 8 61 0 1 -2 -2 Tract I Field 1896-11 f5p41 Req'd Nutrients 50 150 60 0 0 0 2 2 Acres App. Period 1.67 1011-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryvillc Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 1.0Tons 05-02-06 Manure 50 27 68 6 0 1 0 0 P Removal Rating 15 Ibs/ac. Loos BALANCE 0 -123 8 6 0 1 -2 •2 Tract I Field 1896-9 f5p42 Req'd Nutrients 50 150 60 0 0 0 2 2 Acres App, Period 3.92 10/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Sinai] Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Conunercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05-02.06 Manure 50 27 68 6 0 1 0 0 P Removal Rating 15 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -123 8 6 0 1 -2 .2 Tract Field 1896-1I f5p43 Req'd Nutrients 50 150 60 0 0 0 2 2 Acres App. Period 2.01 10/1-3BI Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fcrt. 01 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 50 27 68 6 0 1 0 0 val Rating 15 lbs/ac. BALANCE 0 -123 S 6 0 1 -2 -2 IPtRcni, Cield 1896-11 f5p44 Req'd Nutrients 50 150 60 0 0 0 22App. Period 4.03 1011-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Stnall Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Aulryville Residuall 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date LOTons 1 05-02-06 Manure 1. 501 27 68 6 0 1 0 0 P Removal I Rating 15 1bslac. ILow BALANCE 0 -123 8 61 01 1 -2 -2 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 NMR Page 7 of 32 Nutrient Managemdflt Recommendations Test YEAR 0 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) M11 (lbs/A) 7,i (lbs/A) 01 (lbs/A) Lithe (tons/A) Tract Field 1896-11 1505 Req'd Nutrients 50 150 60 0 0 0 2 2 Acres App. Period 2.19 10/1-3/3l Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fero. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 50 27 68 6 0 1 0 0 P Removal IRating ] S Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -123 8 61 0 1 -2 -2 Tract Field 1896-11 f6p33 Req'd Nutrients 50 130 20 0 0 0 0 1 Acres jApp. Period 1.27 10/1-3131 Supplied By; CROP Small Grain Ovemeed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Comtercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 01 0 RYE I Sample Date 1.0Tons 05-02-06 Manure 50 27 68 6 0 1 0 0 P Rimoval IRating 15 lbslac. Low BALANCE 0 -103 48 6 0 1 0 -1 Tract Field 1896-U f6p34 Req'd Nutrients 50 130 20 0 0 0 0 1 Acres App. Period 1.99 10/13/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 01 0 0 01 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05.02.06 Manure 50 27 68 6 0 1 0 0 val Rating 15 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -103 48 6 0 1 0 -I ERe.�,ntc Field I896 Tl f6p35 Eicq'd Nutrients 50 130 20 0 0 0 0 1 App, Period 2.46 1011-3131 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fed. 0 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE ISample Date 1.0 7bns 05.02-06 Manure 50 27 68 6 0 1 0 0 P Removal I Rating 1S lbs/ay. Low BALANCE 0 -103 48 6 0 1 0 -1 Tract Field 1896-11 i7p46 Req'd Nutrients *301 150 40 0 0 01 2 l Acres App. Period 4.13 10/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual •0 0 0 0 01 0 01 0 RYF I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05.02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 t 0 0 P Removal Rating 15 Ihs/ae. Law BALANCE" 0 -134 1 4 01 E -2 -1 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/1012015 NMR Page 8 of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 0 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mll (lbs/A) 7a1 (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tonslA) Tract I Field 1896-11 f7p47 Req'd Nutrients *30 150 40 0 0 0 2 1 Acres App. Period 1.31 10/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual +0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 1.0 Toes 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 PRemoval Rating t5lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -134 1 4 0 1 -2 -1 Tract IField 1896-11 t7p48 Req'd Nutrients *30 150 40 0 0 01 2 I Acres App, Period 2.68 10/1-3/31 Supplied ay: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cormiiercial Fert. 01 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual #0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 1,0 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 P Removal IRating -Tract I Field 151bslac. 1896-11 1,ow f7p49 BALANCE Req'd Nutrients 0 *30 -134 1501 1 40 4 0 0 0 1 0 -2 2 -1 1 Acres App. Period 0,75 10/1-3131 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CommerciaiFert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Aulryville Residual *01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date l.0 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 P Removal Rating IS lWac. Low BALANCE, 0 -134 1 41 0 1 -2 -1 Tract Field 1896-[I f7p50 Req'd Nutrients *30 150 40 0 0 0 2 1 Acres App, Period 2.16 1011-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fed. 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual #0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 1.0 "rons 05-02-06 Manure 30 16 41 4 0 1 0 0 P Removal Rating Tract Field 15 lbslae. 1896-11 Low f8p36 BALANCE Req'd Nutrients 0 50 -134 150 1 80 4 0 0 0 1 0 -2 2 -1 2 Acres App. Period 1.33 10/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fey(. 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 50 27 68 6 0 1 0 0 P Removal I Rating 15 Ibslae. Low BALANCE 0 -123 -12 6 0 1 -Z -2 895117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7110/201S NMR Page 9 of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 0 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (Ibs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn OWA) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tonslA) Tract Field 1896-11 t8p37 Req'd Nutrients 50 150 80 0 0 0 2 2 Acres App. Period 1.73 10/1-3/31 Supplied 13y: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 01 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Catranercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 Sample Date 1.0Tons 05.02-06 Manure 50 27 68 6 0 1 0 0 Rating 15 lbs/ac. ow BALANCE 0 -123 -12 6 0 I -2 •2 ERemoval Field 1896-11 18p38 Req'd Nutrients 50 150 80 0 0 0 2 2 App. Period 1.73 1011-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autr}Tille Residual 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 RYE Sample Dale 1.01b11S 05-02.06 Manure 50 27 68 6 0 1 0 0 P Rcmvval Rating 15 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -123 -12 6 0 1 -2 -2 Tract Field 1896-H 18p39 Req'd Nutrients SO 150 80 0 0 0 2 2 Acres App. Period 1.64 10/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date LO Tens 05-02-0fi Manure 50 271 68 61 0 1 0 0 P Removal Rating 151bslac. Low BALANCF 0 -123 -121 6 0 1 -2 -2 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. 885117 Database Version4.1 Date Printed; 7/10/2015 NMRPage 10 of 32 Nutrient Management Recomnendations Test YEAR 1 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (Ibs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mil (lbs/A) Zit (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Traci Field 1896-11 f1p5 Req'd Nutrients 222 150 120 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.98 *3/1-10131 Supplied By: CROP Hybrid Rermudagrass Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Commmercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ample [late 6.5'faus 05-02-06 Manure 222 121 304 27 l 5 1 0 Rating 8 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 01 -29 194 27 1 5 1 0 FRemoval Field 1896-11 flp6 Req'd Nutrients 222 150 120 0 0 0 0 0 App. Period 6.06 s3/1-10131 Supplied By: CROP Hybrid Bernudagrass Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e 6.5 Tons 05.02-06 Manure 222 121 304 27 1 5 1 0 g 8 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -29 184 27 1 5 1 0 W 1896-11 11p7 Req'd Nutrients 222 150 1200 0 0 0 0 d 4.86 *3/1-10131 Supplied By: CROP Hybrid Bennudagrass Paslure Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fed, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 6.5Tons 05-02-06 Manure 222 121 304 27 1 S 1 0 P Removal Rating 8 Ulm Low BALANCE 0 -29 184 27 1 5 1 0 Tract Fic[d 1896-11 tTp8 Req'd Nutrients 2221 150 120 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.30 *3/1-10/31 Supplied By CROP Hybrid Bennudagrass Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial FerL 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RY> Sample Date 6.5 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 222 121 304 27 1 S 1 0 P Removal Rating 8lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -29 184 27 l 5 1 0 Traci Field 1896-11 flp9 Req'd Nutrients 222 150 120 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 3.04 *3/1-10131 Supplied By: CROP Hybrid Bennudagrass Pastura Starter 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Conunercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 6.5 Toils 05-02-06 i Manure 222 121 304 27 1 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 8 Ibs/aG. LOW BALANCE 0 29 184 27 1 5 I 0 885117 Oatabase Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 NMR Page 11 of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR ] N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (Ibs1A) Mg (1bs1A) MIl (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Ctl (lbs(A) Lime (tonslA) Traci Field 1896-11 UP] Req'd Nutrients 131 i5D 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 0.43 2/15.6/30 Supplied By: _ CROP Corn, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual #40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 115 bu. 05-02.06 Manure 91 50 125 11 0 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 51 lbslac. Low BALANCE 0 -100 851 11 0 2 0 0 Tract Field 1896-11 f2p31 Req'd Nutrients 125 150 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres lApp. Period 0.43 9/1-4130 Supplied By: CROP Wheat, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D Conunerciat Fert. 0 0 0 01 D 0 0 0 Soil SerieS Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 60 bu. 05.02-06 Manure 125 68 171 15 1 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 30 lbs/ac. tow BALANCE 0 .82 131 15 1 3 1 .0 Tract IField 1896-II f2p32 Req'd Nutrients 131 150 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 0.70 2/15-6130 Supplied By: CLOP Corn, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 115 bu. 05-02.06 Manure 91 50 125 11 0 2 0 0 1' Removal I Rating 51 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -100 85 111 0 2 0 0 Tract IField 1896-11 f2p32 Req'd Nutrients 125 150 40 0 0 01 0 0 Acres App. Period 0.70 9/1-4/30 Supplied By: CROP Wheat, Grain Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fett. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 60 bu. 05.02-06 Manure 125 68 171 15 t 31 1 0 P Removal Rating 301bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -82 131 15 L 31 1 0 Tract I Field 1896-11 f3p22 Req'd Nutrients 131 150 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 3.08 2/15.6130 Supplied By: C1tOP Corn, Gruin Starter 01 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Conunereial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I sample Date 115 bu. 05-02.06 Manure 91 50 125 11 D 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 51 lbslac. Medium BALANCE 0 -100 115 11 0 2 0 0 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 NMR Page 12 of 32 Nutrient Management Reconunendations Test YEAR 1 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) MI (lbs/A) A (lbs/A) CII (lbs/A) Lime (to1Is/A) Tract Field 1896-11 t3p22 Rcq'd Nutrients 125 150 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 3.08 9/1-4/30 Supplied By: CROP Wheat, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commtercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Stunple Date 60 bu. 05.02.06 Manure 125 68 171 15 1 3 1 0 Rating 30 lbslac- edium BALANCE 0 -82 161 15 1 3 1 0 tval Field 1896.11 13p23 Req'd Nutrients 131 150 10 0 0 0 0 0 App. Period 1.55 2/15.6/30 Supplied By: CROP COm, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Ararfotk Residual -40 0 0 01 0 4 0 0 RYE I sample Date 115 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 91 50 125 11 0 2 0 0 P Removal IHaling 51 Ibs/ae. Medium BALANCE 0 -100 115 11 0 2 0 0 Tract IField 1896-1i f3p23 Req'd Nutrients 125 1501 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres IApp. Period 1.55 9/1-4/30 Supplied By: CROP Wheal, Grain Starter 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Commerdal Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sail Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 RYE Sample Date 60 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 125 68 171 15 1 3 I 0 P Removal Rating 30 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 .82 161 15 1 3 I 0 Tract I Field 1896-11 0p24 Req'd Nutrients 131 150 10 01 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.27 2115-6/30 Supplied By: CROW Corn, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 040 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date t 15 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 91 50 125 11 0 21 0 0 P Removal I Rating 51 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 1-100 115 11 0 2 0 0 Tract I Field 1896-il f3p24 Req'd Nutrients 125 150 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period L27 911.4/30 Supplied By: CROP Wl1eat, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 01 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 RYE I Samplo Date 60 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 125 68 171 15 1 3 1 0 P,Removal Rating 30lbslac. bledium BALANCE 0 -82 161 15 1 3 1 0 8851 l7 Database Version 4. t Datc Printed; 7/1012015 NMR Page 13 of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR t N (Ibs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 OWN Mg (lbs/A) N61 (lbs/A) Zn Olbs1A) Cu (Ibs/A) Lime (tons/A) tract Field 1896-II 1 f3p24A Rcq'd Nutrients 125 150 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App, Period 1.27 1 9/14/30 Supplied By: CROP Wheat, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 60 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 125 68 171 15 1 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 30 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 -82 161 151 1 31 1 0 Tract Field 1896-11 np24A Rcq'd Nutrients 131 150 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.27 2/15.6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conunercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 oi 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual #40 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 115 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 91 50 125 11 0 2 0 0 1' Removal Rating Tract Field 51 lbs/ac. 1896-11 Medium f3p25 BALANCE Req'd Nutrients 0 131 -100 1501 115 t0 11 0 0 0 2 0 0 01 0 0 Acres App. Period 2.62 2/15.6/30 Supplied By: CROP Cam, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *40 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 115 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 91 50 125 11 0 2 0 0 P Removal I Rating 51 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 -100 115 11 0 2 0 0 tract Field 1896-11 f3p25 Rcq'd Nutrients 125 150 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 2.62 911-4/30 Supplied By: CROP Wheat, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 Commercial Feri. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 60 bu. 05-02-06 Mauure 125 68 171 15 1 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 30 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 -82 161 15 1 3 1 0 Tract Field 1896-11 f3p26 Req'd Nutrients 125 150 t0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App, Period 2.93 9/1-4/30 Supplied By: CROP Wheat, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 01 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 RYE, I Sample Date 60 bu. 05-02-06 IMedium Manure 125 68 171 15 1 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 301balac. BALANCE 0 82 161 15 1 3 1 0 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 1/10/2015 NMR Page 14 of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/rl) M11 (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) CU (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract I Pield 1896411 f3p26 Req'd Nutrients 131 150 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 2.93 1 2115-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Com, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 115 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 91 50 125 11 0 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 51 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 -100 115 11 0 2 0 0 Tract Field 1896-I1 f3p27 Req'd Nutrients 131 150 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.10 2115-6/30 Supplied 13y: CROP Com, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 01 00 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 040 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 RYB I Sample Date 115 bu. 05.02.06 Manure 91 50 125 11 0 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 51 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 -100 115 11 0 2 0 0 Tract Field 1896-11 f3p27 Req'd Nutrients 125 150 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App- Period 4.10 9/1-4/30 Supplied By: CROP W11cat, Grain Starter 0 0 0 01. 0 0 0 0 Conunercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 01 0 0 0 0 01 0 RYE I Sample Date 60 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 125 68 171 15 1 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 30 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 -82 161 15 1 3 1 0 Tract I field 1 1896-11 f3p28 Req'd Nutrients 125 150 10 01 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.10 911 AM Supplied 13y: CROP Wheat, Grain Starter 01 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 60 bu. 05.02-06 Mamtre 125 68 171 1511 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 30lbs/ac. Medium 13ALANCE 0 -82 161 15 1 3 1 0 Tract IField 1896-11 f3p28 Req'd Nutrients 131 150 10 0 0 01 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.10 2/15-6130 Supplied By: CROF Corn, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conunercial Fert. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *40 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 RYHj Sample Date 115 bu. 05-02-06 Manurel 91 50 125 It 0 2 0 0 PRemoval Rating Si lbs/ac. JIMedium BALANCE I 0 -100 115 11 01 21 0 0 895117 Database Version 4.1 pate Printed: 7/10/2015 NMR Page 15 of 32 Nutrient Management Recolamiendations Test YEAR. 1 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (Ibs/A) MI1 (lbs/A) UI (lbs/A) CU (lbs/A) Litne (tons/A) Tract Field 1896-II f3p29 Req'd Nutrients 131 150 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.18 zl15-6130 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Grain Starter 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conmiercial Fert. 0 0 0 01 0. 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual •40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sample Date 115 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 91 50 125 11 0 2 0 0 moval Rating 51 lbslac. Medium BALANCE 0 -100 115 11 0 2 0 0 ct F Field 1896-i1 f3p29 Req'dNutrients 125 I50 !0 0 0 0 0 0 s jApp. Period 4.18 9/1-4130 Supplied By: CROP Wheal, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contuiervial Fert, 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 60 bu. 05.02-06 Manure 125 68 171 I5 1 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 30lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 -82 161 15 1 3 1 0 Tract Field 1896-11 f3p30 Req'dNutrients 13l t501 10 0 01 0 01 0 Acres App- Period 4.59 2(15-6130 Supplied By: CROF Corn, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial pert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual '40 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 115 bu. 05.02-06 Manure 91 50 125 11 0 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 51 lbslac. Medimn BALANCE 0 -100 115 11 0 2 0 0 Tract Field 1896-1f f3p30 Req'd Nutrients 125 150 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres iApp. Period 4.54 911-4130 Supplied By: CROP Wheat, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert.! 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 4 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 RYS I Sample Date 60 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 125 68 171 15 1 31 1 0 P Removal Rating 30lbs/ae. Medium BALANCE 0 -82 161 15 1 3 1 0 Tract Field 18964I Ap10 Req'd Nutrients 104 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres lApp. Period 4.36 2/15.6/30 Supplied By: CltOP Corn, Grain Slarter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Feil. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Sail Series Autryville Residual #40 0 0 0 0 01 01 0 RYi I Sample Date 85 bu. OS 42-06 Manure 64 35 88 8 0 1 0 0 Y Removal Rating 371Uslac. Low BALANCE 0 -115 88 8 0 11 0 0 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10R015 NMR Page, 16 of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N (lbs/A) P2O5 (lbs/A) K2O OWN Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) at (WA) Litne (Ions(A) Tract Field 1896.1I NPIO Req'd Nutrients 1041 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.36 1 9/14/30 Supplied By: CROP Wheal, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 45 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 1041 57 142 13 1 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 23 lbslac, Low BALANCE 0 -93 142 131 1 2 0 0 Tract I Field 1896-11 Ap11 ltcq'd Nutrients 104 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.39 2/15-6130 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryvillo Residual 4,40 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 85 bu. 05.02-06 Manure 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 371bsiac. Low BALANCE 0 -150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 1896-11 Ap1 t Req'd nutrients 104 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.39 9/1-4/30 Supplied By: CROP Wheat, brain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual 0 01 0 0 0 0 01 0 RYE I Sample Date 45 bu. 05.02-06 Manure 104 57 142 13 1 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 23 Ibs/ac, Low BALANCE 0 -93 142 131 1 2 0 0 Tract Field 1896-11 Rp12 Req'd nutrients 104 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.31 2115-6f30 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Grain Starter 01 0 0 0 0 01 oi 0 Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual #401 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 85 ba. 05.02-06 Manure 64 35 88 8 0 1 0 0 P Removal Rating 37lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -1 15 88 8 0 1 0 0 Tract I Field 1896-11 Np12 Req'd Nutrients 104 i50 0 0 0 01 0 0 Acres App. Pcriad 4.31 9/1-4/30 Supplied By: CROP Wheat, Grain Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 RYE I Sample Date 45 bu. 05.02.06 Manure 104 57 142 13 1 I 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 23 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -93 142 13 1 2 01 0 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 NMR Page 17 of 32 Nutfient Management Recolluuendations 'rest YEAR N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Nn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons(A) Tract I Field 1896-11 f4p13 Req'd Nutrients 104 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres jApp. Period 3.24 1 9/1-4/30 Supplied By: CROP Wheat, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO1nInercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 45 bu. 05.02-06 Manure 104 57 142 13 1 2 0 0 1' Removal Rating 23lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 93 142 131 1 2 0 0 Tract Field 1896-11 f4p l3 Req'd Nutrients 104 I50 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 3.24 2115-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corny Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autr5Tjllo Residual *40 0 01 01 0 01 0 0 RYE Sample Date 85 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 64 35 88 8 0 1 0 0 P Removal Rating 37lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -115 88 8 0 1 0 0 Tract Field 1896-11 Mp14 Req'd Nutrients 125 150 0 01 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 3.79 9/1-4/30 Supplied By: CROP Wheat, Crain Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 60 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 125 68 171 15 1 3 1 0 P Removal I Rating 30lbs/ac. low BALANCE 0 -82 171 15 1 3 1 0 Tract I Field 1896.11 Mp14 Req'd Nutrients 131 150 0 01 0 01 0 0 Acres jApp. Period 3.79 2/15-6130 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Corrunercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 115 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 91 50 125 11 01 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 51 Ibs/ae. Low BALANCE 0 -100 125 11 0 2 0 0 tract Field - 1896-11 f4p15 Req'd Nutrients 125 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 3.38 9/1-4/30 Supplied By. - CROP Wheat, Grain Starter 01 0 0 0 0 Of 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk, Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 60 bu, 05-02-06 Manure 125 68 171 15 1 3 1 0 P Removal IRating 30lbs/ac. ILow BALANCE 0 -82 171 151 ] 3 1 0 885117 Database Version+1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 NMR Page IS of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR X N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mtt (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Get (lbs/A) Lillie ((ons/A) "Tract Field 1896.11 Pp15 Req'd Nutrients 131 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 3.38 2/15-6130 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Grain Slarter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conunercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 115 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 91 so 125 11 0 2 0 0 P Removal IRating 51 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -1001 125 it 01 2 01 0 Tract Field 1896-11 Np16 Req'd Nutrients 131 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.65 2115-6130 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 01 0 01 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sample Date 115 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 91 50 125 11 0 2 0 0 val Rating 51 Ibs/ae. Low BALANCE 0 -100 125 11 0 2 0 0 E Field 1896-11 f4p16 Req'dNutrients l25 150 0 0 0 4 0 0 App. Period 4.65 9/1-4130 Supplied By: CROP Wheat, Grain Starter 01 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Conunercial Fed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ample Date 60 bu. 05-02-06 Malture 125 68 171 15 1 3 1 0 Rating 3D lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -82 171 15 1 3 1 0 FRc.cyal Field 1896-11 Ap17 Req'd Arutrients 131 150 0 0 D 0 0 0 App. Period 4.56 2/15-6130 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Grant Starter 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Conunereial Fert. 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 115 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 91 50 125 I 0 2 0 0 P Removal I Rating 51 Ibs/ac, Low BALANCE 0 -100 125 11 0 2 0 0 Tract Field 1896-11 f4p 17 Req'd Nutrients 125 150 0 0 0 01 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.56 9/1-4/30 Supplied By; CROP Wheat, Grain Starter D 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Commerciat Felt. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 60 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 125 68 171 15 1 3 1 0 P Removal I Rating 30 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -82 171 l5 ] 1 3 1 0 995117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 111MO15 NMR Page 19 of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (Ibs1A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) 7Ar (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tonFM) Tract field 1896.11 008 Req'd Nutrients 13l 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres jApp. Period L29 1 2/15-6130 Supplied By: CROF Corn, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conitnercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Notfoik Residual 440 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 115 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 91 50 125 11 0 2 0 0 PRemoval Rating 51lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 01 AGO 125 li 0 21 0 0 Tract I Field 1896-I1 f4p38 Req'd Nutrients 125 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.29 9/1-4/30 Supplied By: CROP Wheat, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 01 0 01 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 60 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 125 68 171 15 1 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 30lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 4 -82 171 is 1 3 1 0 Tract I Field 1896-I1 AP19 Req'd Nutrients 125 15D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.14 9/1-4130 Supplied By: CROP Wheat, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Cornmercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Sail Series Norfolk Residual 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 60 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 125 68 171 15 l 3 1 0 P Removal Rating Tract I Field 30 lbs/ac. 1896.11 Low f4p19 BALANCE Req'd Nutrients 0 131 -82 150 t71 0 15 0 l 0 3 0 ! 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.14 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Coni, Grain Starter 01 0 0 01 0 of 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 115 bu. 05.02-06 Manure 91 50 125 11 0 2 01 0 P Removal Rating 51 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -100 125 11 0 2 0 0 Tract Field 1896-11. f4p20 Req'd Nutrients 125 IM 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.35 9/1-4130 Supplied By: CROP W11cat, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Conunercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 60 bu. 1 05.02.06 Manure 125 68 171 15 1 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 30 Ibs/ac. ILow BALANCE 0 -32 171 15 1 1 3 1 D 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 NMR Page 20 of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N (lbs1A) P205 (lbs1A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (Ibs/A) Ki (lbs/A) Zn (Ibs1A) Q1 (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract Field 1896-11 f4p20 Req'd Nutrients 131 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1,35 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conunerci al Fert. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample pate 115 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 91 5o 125 11 0 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 51 lbslac. Low BALANCE 0 -100 125 11 0 2 0 0 Tract Field 1896.11 €4p21 Req'd Nutrients 131 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.52 2/15-6130 Supplied By: CROP Cont, Chain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conunercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual •40 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 115 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 91 50 125 11 0 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 51 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -100 125 11 0 2 0 0 Tract I Field 1896-11 f4p21 Req'd Nutrients 125 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.52 9/1-4/30 Supplied By: CROP Wheal, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 60 bu. 05-02.06 Manure 125 68 171 1S 1 3 1 0 P Removal I Ratuig 30lbslac. Low BALANCE 0 -82 t71 15 1 3 t 0 Tract Field 1896-11 f5p40 Req'd Nutrients 202 1501 140 0 0 01 0 0 Acres App. Period 3.67 13/1-10131 Supplied By: CROP Hybrid Berrnudagrms Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cornmerciat Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample pale 5.5'fons 05-02-06 Manure 202 1101 277 25 1 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 7lbslac. Low BALANCE 0 40 137 25 1 5 1 0 Tract Field 1896-11 f5p41 Req'd Nutrients 202 150 140 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.67 •311-10131 Supplied By: CROP Nybrid Bermudagmss Pasture Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Aubyville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 5.5 Tons 1 05-02-06 Manure 202 110 - 277 25 1 5 1 0 P Reritovat IRating 71bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -40 137 25 t 5 1 0 895117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printcd: 7/10/2015 NMR Page 21 of 32 Nutrient Management ReconlniendatiODs Test YEAR 1 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) 7ai (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Littte (tons/A) True( I Field 1896-R f5p42 Req'd Nutrients 202 150 140 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 3.92 *3/1-10I3! Supplied By: CROP Hybrid Bertnudagrass Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cottunercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Aulryville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 5.5 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 202 110 277 25 1 5i 1 0 P Removal Rating 7 lbs/ac, Low BALANCE 0 40 1137 25 1 51 1 0 Tract Field 1896-11 f5p43 Req'd Nutrients 202 1511 140 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 2.01 *3/1-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Hybrid Berinudagrass Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cotnt31ercial Fert. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Sail Series Autryville Residual 0 01 0 01 0 D 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 5.5 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 202 1101 277 251 1 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 7 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 40 137 251 1 5 1 0 Tract IField 1896-11 f5p44 Req'd Nutrients 202 150 140 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.03 *3/I-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Hybrid Bennudagrass Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Conunereiat Fed. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 41 RYE I Sample Date 5.5 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 202 110 277 25 1 5 1 0 P Removal I Rating 7 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 40 137 25 1 5 t 0 Tract I Field 1896-11 r5p45 Req'd Nutrients 202 150 140 0 0 01 0 0 Acres jApp. Period 2.19 *3/1-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Hybrid Bennudagrass Pasture Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual 0 Of 0 0 0 0 01 0 RYE I Sample Date 5.5 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 202 110 277 25 1 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 7 lbs/ac- Low BALANCE 0 -40 137 25 1 5 1 0 Tract Field 1896-11 f6p33 Req'd Nutrients 296 130 80 0 0 01 0 0 Acres App- Period 1.27 1 43/1-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Hybrid Bermadagrass Hay Starter 01 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 D 0 0 0 0 01 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0! 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 6.5 Tans 05-02-06 Manure 296 161 405 36 1 7 1 0 P Rcmtrval xating SO lbs/ae. [.ow I BALANCE f 0 31 325 36 11 7 1 0 895117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 NMR Page 22 of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N (lbs/A) P205 (Ibs/A) K20 (Ibs/A) Mg (IWA) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Ca (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract I Field 1896-i1 f6p34 Req'd Nutrients 296 130 80 0 0 0 0 0 Acres jApp. Period 1.99 1 *3/1-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 6.5 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 296 161 405 36 l 7 1 0 P Removal Rating 80lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 31 325 36 1 11 1 0 Tract I Field 1896-11 f6p35 Req'd Nutrients 296 130 80 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 2.46 43/1-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 01 0 0! 01 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 6.5 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 296 161 405 36 1 7 1 0 P Removal Rating 80lbslae. Low BALANCE 0 31 325 36 1 7 1 0 Tract I Ficld 1896-11 P7p46 Req'd Nutrients 104 150 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.13 2/I5-6/30 Supplied By: CROW Corn, Grain Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual •40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Samplo Date 85 bit, 05-02-06 Manure 64 35 88 8 0 1 0 0 P Removal Rating 37 lbslac. Luw BALANCE 0 -115 48 8 0 I 0 0 Tract I Field 1896-11 f7p46 Req'd Nutrients 104 150 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.13 9/1-4130 Supplied By: CROP Wheat, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 45 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 104 57 142 13 1 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 23 lbslac. Low BALANCE 0 -93 102 13 1 2 0 0 Tract I Field 1896-11 f7p47 Req'd Nutrients 104 150 40 101 0 0 0 0 Acres App, Period 1.31 2/15-6/30 Supplied By; CROP Corn, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Pert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual *40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iRYE I Sample Date 85 bu. 05.02-06 Monorol 64 35 88 8 0 I 0 0 P Removal Rating 37 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 115 48 8 fl 1 0 0 885117 Database Version 4.1 bate Printed: 7/10/2015 NMR Page 23 of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mll (lbs/A) A (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A). Tract I Field 1896-11 f1p47 Req'd Nutrients 104 I50 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.31 1 9/1-4/30 Supplied By: CROP Wheat, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Auiryville. Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 45 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 104 57 142 13 1 2 0 0 P Removal I Rating 23 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -93 102 13 1 2 0 0 Tract Ficld 1896-11 f1p48 Req'd Nutrients 104 150 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 2.68 9/1-4/30 Supplied By: CROP Wheat, Grain Starter 0 0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 01 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 45 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 104 57 142 13 1 2 0 0 P Removal I Rating 23 Ibs/ac- Low BALANCE 0 -93 102 131 1 2 0 0 Tract Field 1896-11 f/p48 Req'd Nutrients 104 150 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 2-68 2/15-6130 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryvi0e Residual *40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ample Date 85 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 64 35 88 8 0 1 0 0 vat Rating 37 Ibs/ac. Lott' BALANCE 0 -115 48 8 0 1 0 0 ERenw Field 1896-It t7p49 Req'd Nutrients 104 150 40 0 0 0 0 0 App. Period 0,75 2115.6/30 Supplied By: CROP Cam, Grain . Starter 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryvillc Residual +40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 85 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 64 35 88 8 0 1 01 0 P Removal Rating 37 lbs/ae. Low BALANCE 0 -115 48 8 0 1 0 0 Tract Field 1896-11 f/p49 Req'd Nutrients 104 150 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 035 9/1.4/30 Supplied By: CROP Wheat, Grain Starter 01 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Coaunercial Felt. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryvifle Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 45 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 104 57 142 131 l 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 23 lbs/ae. Low BALANCE 0 -931 102 131 1 2 0 0 895117 Database Version 4.1 Date printed: 7/10/2015 NMR Page 24 of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N (ibs/A) P205 (1bs/A) K20 (1bslA) Mg (Ibs/A) Mn (lbs/A) 711 (lbslA) Cu (lbs/A) Li1ne (tons/A) Tract Field 1996-1I f7p50 Req'd Nutrients 104 150 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 2.16 9/14/30 Supplied By: CROP Wheat, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contntercial rert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 45 bu- 05-02-06 Manure 104 57 142 13 1 2 0 0 P Removal I Rating 23 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 .931 102 13 1 21 0 0 Tract field 1.896-II f7p50 Req'd Nutrients 104 I50 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App, Period 2.16 2115-6130 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conunercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Aulryvillc Residual #401 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 85 bu. 05-02.06 Manure 64 35 88 8 0 1 0 0 P Removal IRating 37 lbs/ae. Low BALANCE 0 -115 48 8 0 1 0 0 Tract I Field 1896-11 ap36 Req'd Nutrients 269 150 160 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.33 •3/1-10131 Supplied By-. CROP Hybrid Bertnudagrass Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conunercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Soil Series Autryvilic Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 5.5 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 269 1471 368 33 1 6 1 0 P Removal IRaying 68 lbslac. Low BALANCE 0 -3 208 33 l 6 1 0 Traci I Field 1896.11 f8p37 Req'd Nutrients 269 150 160 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.73 #3/1-10/31 Supplied By: CROP 1 iybrid Berrnudagrass Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Commercial Pert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Aulryville Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 5.5 Tons 05.02-06 Manure 269 t47 368 33 1 6 1 0 P Removal I Rating 68 lbs/ac. Low 13ALANCE 0 -3 208 33 t 6 1 0 Tract I Field 1896-II 18p38 Req'd Nutrients 269 150 160 0 0 01 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.73 4311-10131 Supplied By: CROP Hybrid Berrnudagrass Hay Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Conan ercial Pert. 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Aulryville. Residual 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 5.5 Tons 05-02-06 Manorel 269 147 368 33 1 6 1 0 P Removal Rating 68 ibs/ac. ow BALANCE 0 -3 208 33 t 61 1 0 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 NMR Page 25 of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test Y1CAR 1 N (Ibs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (Ibs1A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Z11 (lbs/A) C11 (Ibs1A) Lime (tonslA) Tract Field 1896-11 f8P39 Rey'd Nutrients 269 150 160 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.64 f3/1-10/31 5upPlied By: CROP Hybrid Bermud,agmss Bay Starter 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autmilte Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 5.5 Tons 05-02-06 Manure 269 147 368 33 1 6 1 0 P Removal Rating 68lbslaa. K.NY BALANCE L 0 -31 1 6 1I 0 NOTE: Symbol * mearts user entered data. $85117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 NMR Page 26 of 32 Nutrient Managelnent Reconlnlendations Test YEAR 2. N (lbs/A) P2O5 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mlt (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract Field 1996.11 f2p31 Req'd Nutrients 137 150 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 0.43 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conoriercial Felt. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Bate 35 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 127 69 174 16 1 3 1 0 P Removal I Rating 28 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -81 134 161 1 31 1 0 Tract Field 1896-11 f2p32 Req'd Nutrients 137 1 sol, 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 0.70 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 01 0 0 0 01 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *t0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ample Date 35 bu. 05.02-06 Manure 127 69 174 16 1 3 1 0 vnl Rating 28 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -81 134 16 1 3 1 0 E Fild I896 11 f3p22 Req'd Nutrients 137 I50 10 D 0 0 0 0 App. Period 3.08 411-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *10 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Srunple Date 35 bu. 05-02.06 Manure 127 69 174 16 1 3 1 0 P Removal IRating 28 Ibslac. N4ediunt 13ALAN ICE 0 -81 164 16 I 3 1 0 Tract Field 1896.11 f3p23 Req'd Nutrients 137 150 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.55 4/1-9115 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 01 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Connnercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 SOii Series I Norfolk Residual *10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 35 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 127 69 174 16 1 3 1 0 P Removal I Rating 28 lbsJac. Medium BALANCE 0 -81 164 16 1 3 1 0 Tract Field 1896-11 r3p24 Req'd Nutrients 137 150 101 0 0 01 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.27 4/1-9115 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 01 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 111 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date, 35 bu. 05-02.06 Manure 127 69 174 16 1 3 1I 0 P Removal I Rating 28 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 -81 164 16 1 31 1 0 985117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 NMR Page 27 of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 2 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) 711 (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tousrA) "Tract I Field 1896-]L t3p24A Req'd Nutrients 137 150 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.27 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conunercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual 410 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 35 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 127 69 174 16 1 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 28 lbs/ac. 4ledium BALANCE 0 -81 164 16 1 31 1 0 Tract Field 1896-11 f3p25 Req'd Nutrients 137 Mo 10 0 0 0 4 0 Acres App. Period 2.62 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 35 bu. 05-02-06 Manure I27 69 174 16 1 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 28 lbstuc. Medium BALANCE 0 -81 164 16 1 3 1 0 -tract IField 1896.11 f3p26 Req'd Nutrients 137 1501 10 U. 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 2.93 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commerci at Fen. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RY13 I Sample Date 35 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 127 69 174 16 1 3 1 0 PRemoval Rating 28lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 -81 164 16 1 3 1 0 Traci Field 1896-II t3p27 Req'd Nutrients 137 150 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.10 411-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Conunercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 35 bu. 05.02-06 Manure 127 69 174 16 l 3 l 0 P Removal Rating 29lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 .81 164 161 1 3 1 0 Tract I Field I896dI f3p28 Req'd Nutrients 137 150 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App. Period 4. O 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Comtnercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual #10 0 01 01 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 35 bu, 05-02-06 Manure 127 69 174 16 l 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 28lbs/ac. edium BALANCE 0 -81 164 16 1 3 1 0 885117 Database Version 4.1 hate Printed: 7/10120I5 NMR Page 23 of 32 Nutrient Management Reconui>endations 'Pest YEAR 2 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (ibs/A) mi (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) CAI Obs/A) Lisle (tons/A) Tract Field 1896-11 f3p29 Req'd Nutrients 137 150 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period - 4.18 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Cornniercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 35 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 127 69 174 16 1 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 28 lbs/ae. Medium 13ALANCE 0 -81 164 16 1 3 1 0 Tract Field 1896-11 f3p30 ReWd. Nutrients 137 150 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.59 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans; Manured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 01 0 01 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *101 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 35 bu. 05.02-06 Manure 127 69 174 16 1 3 I 0 P Removal Rating 28 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 -81 164 16 1 3 I 0 Tract I Field 1896-11 ApIG Req'd Nutrients Wo 150 01 0 0 01 0 0 Acres jApp. Period 4.36 411-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial pert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual *10 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 25 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 90 491 123 11 0 21 0 0 P Removal IRating 20 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -101 123 1I 0 2 0 0 Tract Field 1896-11 f4p11 Req'd Nutrients I00 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.39 411-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Conuttercial Fert. 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual *10 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 25 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 90 49 123 11 0 2 0 0 P Removal IRating 20 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -101 123 11 0 2 0 0 Tract I Field 1896-II Rp12 Req'd Nutrients 1001 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.31 4/1-9115 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Magared, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual *10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 25 bu. 05.02-06 Manure 90 49 123 t 1 0 2 0 0 P Remova! Rating 201bs1ac. Low BALANCE 0 l01 123 I l 0 2 0 0 895117 Database Vmiou 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 NMR Page ,29 of 32 Nutrient Management Recointnendations Test YEAR 2 N (ibs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mil (lbs/A) 211 (1bs1A) Cu (lbs/A) Little (tons/A) Tract I Field 1896-i1 f4pl3 Req'd Nutrients 100 150 4 4 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 3.24 411-9/15 Supplied By. CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 ComrnercialFert. 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual *10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 25 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 90 49 123 11 0 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 201bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -I01 123 11 0 2 0 0 Tract Field 1896-]I Ap14 Req'dNutrients 137 l50 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres jApp. Period 3.79 411-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual •10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Samplc Date 35 bu, 05-02-06 Manure 1271 69 174 16 11 3 1 0 P Removal IRating 28 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -81 174 16 1 3 1 0 Tract Field 1896-i1 f4p15 Req'd Nutrients 137 1501 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App, Period 3.39 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cornmercial Fert. 0 0 0 Oj 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *101 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 35 bu. 05.02-06 Manure 127 691 174 16 1 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 28 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -81 174 16 l 31 1 0 Tract I Field 1896-11 Hp16 Req'dNutrients 137 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.65 1/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conunercia] Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual •10 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 RYE I Sample pate 35 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 127 69 174 16 1 3 1 0 P Removal I Rating 281bs/ac_ ow BALANCE 0 -81 174 16 1 3 1 0 Tract I Field 1896-11 f4p17 Req'dNutrients 137 1501 0 01 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.56 411-9115 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop starter 0 01 0 01 0 0 0 0 Conunercial Fert. 0 0 0 ol 0 0 01 0 Soil Series Norf❑lk Residual •10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Dale 35 bu. 05.02-06 Manure 127 69 174 16 1 3 1 0 P Removal IRating 28 lbs/ae. Low BALANCE 0 -81 174 16 11 3 1 0 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 NMR Page 30 of 32 Nutrient Management Reconunendations Test YEAR 2 N (ItWA) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbVA) ' Cli (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract Field 1896-It f4p18 Req'd Nutrients 137 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.29 1 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 al 0 01 0 0 Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *10 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample late 35 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 127 69 114 16 1 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 28 lbs/ac, ow BALANCE 0 •81 174 16 l 3 1 0 Traci Field 1896-11 f4p19 Req'd Nutrients 137 150 01 0 0 01 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.14 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, lVianured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fett. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 35 bu. 05.02-06 Manure 127 69 174 16 1 31 1 0 P Removal IRating 28 lbs/ac. Low. BALANCE 0 -81 174 16 1 3 1 0 Tract Field 1896.11 RP20 Re4d Nutrients 137 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1,35 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 35 bu. 05.02-06 Manure 127 69 174 16 1 3 1 0 P Removal IRating 28 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -8I 174 16 1 3 1 0 Tract I Field 1896-11 f4p21 Rcq'd Nutrients 137 150 0 01 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.52 4/1-9115 Supplied By; CROP Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Norfolk Residual *10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 35 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 127 69 174 161 1 3 1 0 P Removal I Rating 28 lbs/ac- Low BALANCE 0 -81 174 16 l 31 1 0 Tract Field 1896-11 f7p46 Req'd Nutrients 100 150 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.13 411-9115 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Matured, Double Crop Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Felt. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Aulryville Residual *i0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 25 bu. . 05-02.06 Manure 90 49 123 11 0 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 20 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -101 83 11 0 2 0 0 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 NMR Page 31 of 32 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 2 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (ibs/A) Mu OWA) Z11 (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lirne (tons/A) Tract Field 1896-1I 1 VP47 ReWd Nutrients 100 150 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1,31 1 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ComtnercialFeri. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual *10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 25 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 90 49 123 11 0 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 20lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 01 83 HI0 2 0 0 Tract Field 1896-H Gp48 Req'd Nutrients 100 150 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 2.68 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CRoP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual *10 0 0 01 0 01 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 25 bu. 05-02-06 Man= 90 49 123 111 0 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 201bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -101 83 11 0 2 0 0 Tract I Field 1896-11 f1p49 Re¢d Nutrients 100 150 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 0.75 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conunercial Fert. 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Autryville Residual *10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Stunple Date 25 bu. 05-02-06 Manure 90 49 123 11 0 21 0 0 P Removal Rating 20 lbs/ae. Low BALANCE, 0 -101 83 11 0 2 0 0 Traci I Field 1996-I1 f1p50 Req'd Nutrients 100 150 40 01 0 0 0 0 Acres App- Period Z16 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cornnterd al Fed. 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Soil Series Auuyville Residual *10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 25 bu. U5 02-06 Manure 90 49 123 11 0 2 0 0 P Removal I Rating 2016s1ac. Low BAi.ANCE 0 -101 83 11 0 2 01 0 NO'1'N: Symbol * means user entered data. 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7110/2015 NMR Page 32 of 32 The Rewired Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels ofzinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we can predict life of the site for waste disposal. In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also pro-6des a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production . Required Soil Test Values Tract Field Crop pH Lime Recom. (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation 1896-H f1 p5 Small Crain Oversced 4.8 1.2 21 None 23 None 189641 flp5 Hybrid Bermudagran Pasture 4.8 0.0 21 None 23 None 1896-Il flp6 Small Crain Overseed 4.8 1.2 21 None 23 None 1896-II flp6 Hybrid BermudagrusPasture 4.8 0.0 21 None 23 None 1896-D f1p7 Small Grain Overseed 4.8 1.2 21 None 23 None 1896-U flp7 Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 4.3 0.0 21 Nona 23 None 1896-II fl p8 Small Grain Ovenced 4.3 1.2 21 None 23 None 1996-11 f1pS Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 4.8 0.0 21 None 23 None 1896-13 flp9 Small Grain Overseed 4.3 1.2 21 None 23 None 1896-D flp9 Hybrid Bermudag-ass Pasture 4.3 0.0 21 None 23 None 1896-11 f2p31 Small Grain Overseed 4.9 2.0 26 None 15 None 1896-I1 f2p31 Corn, Crain 4.9 0.0 26 None 15 None 1896-II f2p31 Wbcat, Grain 4.9 0.0 26 None 15 None IS96-II f2p31 Soybeans. Manured, Double Crop 4.9 OA 26 None 15 None 1996-11 f2p32 Small Grain Overseed 4.9 2.0 26 None IS None I89641 12p32 Corn, Grain 4.9 0.0 26 None 15 None 1896-II 12p32 Wheat, Grain 4.9 0.0 26 None 15 None 1896-II I2p32 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.9 0.0 26 None 15 None 1896-I1 i3p22 Small Grain Overseed 4.8 1.3 15 None 4 None 1896-B f3p22 Com, Grain 4.8 0.0 I5 None q None 1896-Il i3p22 Wheat, Grain 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None 1896-II 1 13p22 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None ---------------------------------------------------------------•----...---..-----...........--..----....---.-----.-------------- --------------------.--..-----------•----------•---------------.----------------------.........---------------- 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 07-10-2015 STV Page 1 of 6 1?nmrirar� C'ni1 Tnct Valnae Tract Field Crop pH Limo Recom. (tons/acre) Cu4 Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation 1896-1I f3p23 Small Grain Overseed 4.8 1.3 15 None 4 None 1896-11 f3p23 Corn, Grain 4.S 0.0 15 None 4 None 1396-11 Bp23 Wheat, Grain 4.8' 0.0 15 None 4 None 1896-11 f3p23 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.8 OA 15 None 4 None 1896-II f3p24 Small Grain Ovenced 4.8 1.3 15 None 4 None 1896-11 f3p24 Com, Grain 4.8 0-0 15 None 4 None 1896-I3 f.3p24 Wheat, Grain 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None 1896-11 f3p24 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None 1896.11 5p24A Small Grain Overseed 4.8 1.3 15 None 4 None IS96-11 f3p24A Corn„Grain 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None 1896-11 f3p24A Wheat, Grain 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None 1396-11 f3p24A Soybeans, Manured,, Double Crop 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None 1396.11 f3p25 Small Grain Overseed 4.8 13 15 Nona 4 None 1896-11 f3p25 Corn, Grain 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None IS96-11 f3p25 Wheat, Grain 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None 1896-1I f3p25 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None IS96-11 f3p26 Small Grain Overseed 4.8 1.3 15 None 4 None 1S96-n f3p26 Com, Grain 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None 1896-I1 f3p26 Wheat, Grain 4.8 0.0 15 None q 1 None 1896-u f3p26 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.S 0.0 15 None 4 None 1896-II f3p27 Small Grain Overseed 4.8 1.3 15 Nonc 4 None 1896-II f3p27 Corn, Grain 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None 1996-11 f3p27 Wheat, Grain 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None 1896-II f3p27 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.8 U 15 None 4 None 1896-II. Sp28 Small Grain Overseed 4.S 1.3 15 None 4 None 1896-H Sp28 Corn, Grain 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None 1896-11 f3p28 Wheat, Grain 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None 1896-11 sp28 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None I896-11 f3p29 Small Grain Overseed 4.8 1.3 15 None 4 None 1896-11 f3p29 Com, Crain 1 4.8 1 0,01 15 None 4 None ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------•-----------------------------------------------------------------............................................. --------..............---------------------------••- ----- 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 07-10-2015 STV Page 2 of 6 Required Soil Test Values Tract Field Crop pH Lime Recom. (tons/aere) Cu-I Copper Recommendation 7n-1 Zinc Recommendation 1596-1i j3p29 Wheat, Grain 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None 1896-II fsp29 Soybeans, Manured, ]Double Crop 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None 1896-U f3p30 Small Grain Oversced 4,S 1.3 15 None 4 None 1896-1I f3p30 Corn, Grain 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None 1896-11 f3p30 Wheat, Grain 4.3 0.0 15 None 4 None 1896-II f3p30 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.8 0.0 15 None 4 None IS96-12 Ap10 Small Grain Overseed 4.6 2.1 21 None 18 None 1896-II £4p10 Corn, Grain 4.6 0.0 21 None 18 None 1896-II Ap1D Wheat, Grain 4.6 0.0 21 None 13 None 1896-II f4p10 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.6 0.0 21 None 18 None 1896-11 f4pI1 Small Crain Overseed 4.6 2.1 21 None IS None 1896-II f4pl I Corn, Grain 4.6 0.0 21 None 18 None IS96-II f4p11 Wheat, Grain 4.6 0.0 21 None 18 None 1896-11 Ap l l Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.6 0.0 21 None IS None 1896-H f4p12 Small Grain Overseed 4.6 2.1 21 None IS None 1896-II f4pI2 Corn, Grain 4.6 0.0 21 None 18 None 1896-II f4p12 Wheat, Grain 4,6 0.0 21 None IS None 1896-II f4p12 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.6 0.0 21 None IS None I896-II f4p13 Small Grain Oversced 4.6 2.1 21 None 18 None 1896-II f4pl3 Corn, Grain 4.6 0.0 21 None IS None 1896-II Ap13 Wheat, Grain 4.6 0.0 21 None IS None I896-I1 f4p13 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.6 0.0 21 None 18 None 1896-11 Ap14 Small Grain overseed 4.6 2.1 21 None 18 None 1896-11 f4p14 Cam, Grain, 4.6 0.0 21 None IS None 1896-11 f4p14 Wheat, Grain 4.6 0.0 21 None 18 None 1896-Il f4p 14 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.6 0.0 21 None 18 None 1996-I1 f4pI5 Small Grain Overseed 4.6 2.1 21 None 18 None 1896-Il £4p15 Corn, Grain 4.6 0.0 21 None 18 None 1896-D f4p 15 Wheat, Grain 4.6 0.0 21 None IS None 1996-11 f4p15 Soybeans, Manumd. Double Crop 4.6 0.0 2I 1 None IS None ...... -............................................... .--•----------- ------------------- ----------------------- --------- ••-•... -------- .......... ------------------------------------------------------ ----------------- -------------------------- 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 07-10-2015 STV Page 3 of 6 RP.n1rirpei'qnil Tt et Valttac "Tract Field Crop PH Lime Recom. (to&acre) Cu-I Copper Recommendation Zn-1 Zinc Recommendation 1896-11 f4p16 Small Grain Overxed 4.6 2.1 21 None 18 None 1896-11 f4p16 Corn, Grain 4.6 0,0 21 None 18 None 1896-U Ap16 Wbcat, Grain 4.6 0.0 21 None l8 None 1896-U f4p16 Soybeans, Man ured, Double Crop 4.6 0.0 21 None IS None 1896-U f4p17 Small Grain Overseed 4.6 2.1 21 None I8 None 1896-11 f4p17 Corn, Grain 4.6 0.0 2I None IS None 1896-11 Ap17 Wheat, Grain 4.6 0.0 21 None IS None I896-11 f4p17 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.6 0.0 21 None IS None 1896-H Ap18 Small Grain Overseed 4.6 2.1 21 None IS None 1896-11 Ap18 Com, Grain 4.6 0.0 21 None 18 None 1896-1I Ap18 Wheat, Grain 4.6 0.0 21 None IS None 1S96-Q f4p18 Soybe=, Manured, Double Crop 4.6 0.0 21 None IS None 1896-11 f4p19 Small Grain Oversecd 4.6 2.1 21 None 18 None 1896-II f4p19 Com, Grain 4.6 0.0 21 None 18 None 1896-Q f4p19 WhM Grain 4.6 0.0 21 None 18 None 1896-11 f4p19 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4,6 0.0 21 None 18 None 1890-11 Xp20 Small Grain Overseed 4,6 2.1 21 None Ig None 1 S96-11 f4p20 Corn, Grain 4.6 0.0 21 None 18 None 1896-II f4p20 Wheat, Grain 4-6 0.0 21 None 18 None 1896-U f4p20 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.6 0.0 21 None 18 None 1896-n f4p23 Small Grain Overseed. 4.6 2.1 21 None 18 None 1896-11 Ap21 Corn, Grain 4.6 0.0 21 None IS None I896-U Ap21 Wheat, Grain 4,6 0.0 21 None IS None 1896-11 f4p21 Soybeans, Mattured, Double Crop 4.6 0.0 21 None IS None 1896-1I f.5p40 Small Grain Overseed 4.6 2.0 19 None 0 None I896-II f3p40 Hybrid Bermudag m Pasture 4.6 0.0 19 None 0 None I896-0 f5p41 Small Grain Overseed 4.6 2.0 19 None 0 None 1896-11 f5p41 Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 4.6 0.0 19 None 0 None Ri f 2 Small Grain Overseed 4.6 2.0 19 None 0 None f5p42 Hybrid Bermudagrass Pas ure 4.6 0.0 19 None 0 None ...... ...----------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------•----------------------------------------------------------------- --------------.---------------------------------------------------------- 8851 I7 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 07-10-2015 STV Page 4 of 6 Reauired Sail Test Values Tract Field Crop pH Lime Recom. (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation 1896-II f5p43 Small Grain Overseed 4.6 2.0 19 None 0 None 1896-11 fSp43 Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 4.6 0.0 19 None 0 None 1896-E f5p44 Small Grain Overseed 4.6 2.0 19 1 None 0 None 1896-11 f5p44 Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 4.6 0.0 19 None 0 None 1896-11 £5p45 Small Grain Overseed 4.6 2.0 19 None 0 . None 1896-11 f5p45 Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture 4.6 0.0 19 None 0 None 1896-II f6p33 Small Grain Overseed 5.2 0.9 41 None 52-8 None 1896-13 f6p33 Hybrid Bermudagrass Flay 5.2 0.0 41 None 528 None 1 S96-11 f6p34 Small Grain Overseed 5.2 0.9 41 None 528 None 1896-II f6p34 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.2 0.0 41 None 528 None I896-Q f6p35 Small Grain Overseed 52 0.9 41 None 528 None I896-Q f6p35 Hybrid Bermudagrass Flay 5.2 0.0 41 None 528 None 1896.11 f7p46 Small Grain Overseed 4.7 1.3 22 None 23 None 1896-11 f7p46 Corn, Grain 4.7 0.0 22 None 23 None 1896-11 f7p46 Wheat, Grain 4.7 0.0 22 None 23 None 1896-11 f7p46. Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.7 0.0 22 None 23 None 1896-11 f7p47 Small Grain Overseed 4.7 1.3 22 None 23 None 1896-E f7p47 Corn, Grain 4.7 0.0 22 None 23 None 1896-1I f7p47 Wheat, Grain 4.7 0.0 22 None 23 None 1896-11 f7p47 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.7 0.0 22 None 23 None 1896-U f7p48 Small Grain Oversecd 4.7 1.3 22 None 23 None 1896-11 f7p48 Corn, Grain 4.7 0.0 22 None 23 None 1896-Ir f7p48 Wheat, Grain 4.7 0.0 22 None 23 None 1896-Il f7p48 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.7 0.0 22 None 23 None I896-II f7p49 Small Grain Overseed 4.7 1.3 22 None 23 None I896-1I f7p49 Corn. Grain 4.7 0.0 22 None 23 None 1896-11 f7p49 Wheat, Grain 4.7 0.0 22 None 23 None I896-II f7p49 Soybeans. Manumd, Double Crop 4.7 0.0 22 None 23 None 1896-11 f7pS0 Small Grain Overseed 4.7 1.3 22 None 23 None M96-Il f7p50 Com, Grain 4.7 0.0 22 None 23 None •--•-----------------------------------------------------------•----...------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ •------------------------------- 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed. 07-10-2015 STV Page 5 of 6 Reauired Soil Test Values Tract Field Crop pH Lime Recom. (tonslacre) Cu-I Copper Rccommcndat on Zn-I Zinc Reoommenda6on IS96-II f7p50 Wheat, Grain 4.7 0.0 22 None 23 None 1896-II flp50 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 4.7 0.0 22 None 23 None 1896-11 f8p36 . Small Grain Overseed 4.6 1.8 21 None 15 None 1896-E f8p36 Hybrid Bertnudagrass Hay 4.6 0.0 21 None 15 None 1896-1: f8p37 Small Grain Overseed 4.6 118 21 None 15 None 1896-II f8p37 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 4.6 0.0 21 None 15 None 1896-IC f3p38 Small Grain Overseed 4.6 L8 21 None 15 None 1896-11 f8p38 Hybrid Beanudagrass Hay 1 4.6 1 0.01 21 None 15 None 1896-A f8p39 Small Grain Overseed 4.6 1.8 21 None 1$ None 1896-II f8p39 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 1 4.6 0.01 21 1 None 15 I None ---------------------------------- --- .................................... ------ -................................ I ... .---... --------------------.---------------------------------------------------------••----------•------- ---------------- 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 07-I0-2015 STV Page 6 of 6 The following Lagoon SI udge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column. Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic hatter rcmaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic. rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc call also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied. Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should betaken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be, applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern. Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table Crop Maximum PA-N Rate lb/ac Maxinuun Sludge Application Rate 1000 gallac Minimum Acres 5 Years Accumulation Minimuin Acres 10 Years Accumulation Min initun Acres 15 Years Accumulation Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard Cam 120 bu 150 14.69 129.41 258.81 388.22 Hay 6 ton R.Y.E. 300 29.39 64.70 129.41 194.11 Soybean 40 bu 160 15.67 121.32 242.64 363.96 --------. ... .............•------------------------------------------------------••----------..............--------------------------------------------•--••--•----......---- 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 07-10-2015 Sludge Page 1 of 1 The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero, Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. Ifavailable storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity. Available Waste Storage Cauacity SourceName ISwine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid Design Storage Capacity (Days) Start Date 9/1 l80 Plan Year Month Available Storage Capacity (Days)' 1 t 68 1 2 71 1 3 87 1 4 90 1 5 92 1 6 95 1 7 80 1 8 65 1 9 79 1 10 99 1 11 98 l 12 96 2 1 85 2 2 77 2 3 81 2 4 1.04 2 5 114 2 6 125 2 7 135 2 8 132 2 9 146 2 10 160 2 11 137 2 12 113 * Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month. --------------•-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•--------------------------- -------------------------- 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 07-10-2015 Capacity Page 1 of 1 .Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management 1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of jvaste that reaches surface water is prohibited. Z. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adegaiate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land. 3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients. 4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Feld Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - FiIter Strips). 5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field. 6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres sit bject to flooding, waste will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance). ----- -------------------------------------------------------------------------.----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ 8851 I7 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/1012015 Specification Page 1 7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies. 8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the soil surface is frozen. 9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered. 10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minim uni and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy. 11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters. 12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells. 13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by the landowner. U. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways. .. ---- ----------------------------------------- 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 Specification Page 2 15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site. 16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdolvvn facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system. 17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge. 18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion. 19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site. 20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human consulption, it should only -be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season. 21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------.--- --------------...------------------------------------------------ 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 Specification Page 3 22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions regture waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for rive (5) years. 23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ...-----................------.--------- 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 7/10/2015 Specification Page 4 Crop Notes The following crop note applies to field(s): f2p31, f2p32, f3p22, f3p23, f3p24, f3p24A, f3p25, f3p26, Bp27, f3p28, f3p29, f3p30, f4p14, Ap15, f Corn: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leaching fit the Coastal Plain, corn is norma,lly planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Review the Official Variety "greed book" and information fi•om private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 12" deep. Plant populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20--30 Ibs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a starter and one-half the mmaining N behind the planter, The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40 days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the fertilizer program, file recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production. The following crop note applies to field(s): Ap10, f4pl1, Ap12, f4p13, f7p46, f7p47, f7p48, f7p49, f7p50 Corn: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leaching In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees Fahrenheit. Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1 2" deep. Plant populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 Ibs/acre phosphorus banded as a starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40 days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production. -.-------------------------------------------------- - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 07-10-2015 Crop Note Page l of 6 The following crop note applies to field(s): f6p33, f6p34, f6p35 Berniudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained. Adaptation: Well -adapted. In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3" deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bulac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate ,of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced P to 1.5' in row. For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lblac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. The following crop note applies to field(s): f8p36, f8p37, f8p38, f8p39 Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained. Adaptation: Well -adapted. In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bernmdagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31, Cover sprigs 1" to 3" deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 btilac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years tinder good growing conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in. row. For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. ------- ----1------------------------------- - ---•--------------------------------------------------------------------------------.--....I—— ...•......... 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 07-10-2015 CropDote Page 2 of 6 The following crop note applics to freld(s): f1p5, f1p6, f1p7, flp8, flp9 Bermudagrass: CP, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained. Adaptation: Well -adapted, hi the Coastal Plain, hybrid bertnudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3" deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted Quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions.Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row. For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium and mieronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. The following crop note applies to field(s): f5p40, f5p41, f5p42, f5p43, f5p44, f5p45 Bermudagrass: CP, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained. Adaptation: Well -adapted. In the Coastal Plain, hybrid ber7nudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs i" to 3" deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bulac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced I'to 1.5' in row. For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of line, phosphorus, potassium and rnicronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 1001b/ac N in the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N atumally in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- •--•------- ------- ------------------------------------------- 8s5tt7 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 07-10-2015 Crop Note Page 4 of 6 The following crop note applies to field(s): f2p31, f2p32, f3p22, f3p23, f3p24, f3p24A, f3p25, f3p26, f3p27, f3p28, f3p29, f3p30, f4p14, f4p15, f Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted fiom October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond tine optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grahn Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till- Adequate depth control when planting tite wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "greets book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production. The following crop note applies to feld(s): Mp10, f4pl 1, f4p12, f4p13, f7p46, f7p47, f7p48, f7p49, f7p50 Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be. planted from October 20-November 25. PIant 22 seed/drill row foot at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 301bs/acre N at planting. Phosphorts and potash reconunended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production. ......------------- --------------------------------------------------------- 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 07-10 2015 Crop Note Page 5 of 6 The following crop note applies to field(s): f2p31, f2p32, f3p22, f3p23, f3p24, f3p24A, f3p25, f3p26, f3p27, f3p28, f3p29, f3p30, f4pl4, Mp15, f Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medhim leachable Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th. When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/vow foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. hicrease the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of20-30 Ibs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production. The following crop note applies to field(s): Mp10, f4p11, f4p12, f4p13, f7p46, f7p47, f7p48, f7p49, f7p50 Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medium leachable Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th. When no -tilling soybeans in sinall grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private - companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 3 6 " rows. h'icrease the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their awn nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 Ibs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production. ------------------•.......................---------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------.------------------ 885117 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 07-10-2015 CropNote Pago 6 of 6 N�� - :.. NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Resources Water Quality Programs Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder EGEIVE Skvada, III Governor Director AUG 14 2013 f Secretary August 8, 2013 ; if Kalmar I, LLC Sansanqua Farms P.O. Box 16649 Wilmington, NC 28408 Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310856 Sansanqua Farms Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and Application System Duplin County Dear Kalmar I, LLC: In accordance with your Notification of Change of Ownership received August 8, 2013, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Kalmar L LLC, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste. Management Plan (CAWMP) for the Sansanqua Farms, located in Duplin County, with a swine animal capacity of no greater than the following annual averages: Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: 11,520 Boar/Stud: Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: Gilts: Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other: If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows. The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void Certificate of Coverage Number AWS310856 dated October 1, 2009. Pursuant to this COC, you ire authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations' as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals. Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please nay careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms. 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636 Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Phone: 919-807-6E641 FAX: 91 M07-6492 Intemet www.nowateruualitv.om An Equal opportunity 1 Aflinnative Action Employer NonrthCaroli.na Natumilff -If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate you will need to have a new WUP developed. The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property. Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field. Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143- 215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief. If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration. This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership. If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding. In accordance with Condition 11.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4) hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning, or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Newport/Morehead City, NC National Weather Service office at (252) 223-5737, or by visiting their website at: www.erh.nomggv/er/mhx/ This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at (910) 796-7215. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General Permit%, please contact the Animal Feedin� Operations Unit staff at (919) 807-6464. , Sincerely, for Thomas A. Reeder Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000) cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs) Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section Duplin County Health Department Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District APS Central Files (Permit No. AWS310856) AFO Notebooks Maxwell Foods Inc 02-14-2012 09:17 CAMELLIA SOW FARM 19102709574 Wall. JU• LVII V.illwn -.—,.. ....., --- 11 FEB 2 Z 2012 [ f Wma R, LLC. Claim Rcid Kalmar 1 409 Cole Drive Hampstc4 NC 3VM3 Deoeamber 1, 2011 I DM Y=g with row crap 6-yr-r'Viok 6winson and discussed 16 mistake of pleating to wrong crops on farm for the year 2011. We discumd in depth the impertaace of following ow W UP. We also discussed v&d camas were to be plmnwd for the ym 2012 and if any chu gss wme malls thep would have to bz reviewed by Goldsboro Milling. We also &&used the fields that would be sprigged in the spring of 2012. Billy YOUR r 01-30-2012 08:19 CAMELLIA SOW EFRM 1910iR709574 PAGEI WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Goldsboro Hog Farms, Inc. Friday, December 15, 2000 rUpdated-9/26/20112 Producer: Claire Kalmar Farm Name: Telephone # : Type of Operation : Kalmar II, LLC. 409 Cole Drive Hampstead,NC 28443 (910)293-2149 Feeder to Finish Swine Number of Animals: 11520 hogs design capacity Application Method: Irrigation The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient contents of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and avaialable water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre -cautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems. This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you choose to inject the waste in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating waste are not the same. The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for ananlysis. This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission. Page 1 AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.) 11520 hogs X 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 21888 tons AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR 11520 hogs X 2.3 Ibs PAN/hogslyear = 26496 PAN/year Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner. The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown, soil type and suface application. TABLE 1 : ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE &CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES LBS AW APPLIC. DETERMINING PHASE CODE NACRE NACRE USED TIME 1896 10 AUTRYVILLE ALL C 75 73.75 20 4.36 321.55 MAR-JUN 1896 * 10 AUTRYVILLE ALL SB 25 100 0 4.36 436 APR-SEP 15 1896 10 AUTRYVILLE ALL W 45 103.5 0 4.36 451.26 SEPT-MAR 1896 * 11 AUTRYVILLE ALL C 75 73.75 20 4.39 323.763 MAR-JUN 1896 11 AUTRYVILLE ALL SB 25 100 0 4.39 439 APRSEP 15 1896 * 11 AUTRYVILLE ALL W 45 103.5 0 4.39 454.365 SEPT-MAR 1896 * 12 AUTRYVILLE ALL C 75 73.75 20 4.31 317.863 MAR-JUN 1896 12 AUTRYVILLE ALL SB 25 100 0 4.31 431 APR-SEP 15 1896 * 12 AUTRYVILLE ALL W 45 103.5 0 4.31 446.085 SEPT-MAR 1896 13 AUTRYVILLE ALL C 75 73.75 20 3.24 238.95 MAR-JUN 1896 * 13 AUTRYVILLE ALL SB 25 100 0 3.24 324 APRSEP 15 1896 * 13 AUTRYVILLE ALL W 45 103.5 0 3.24 335.34 SEPT-MAR 1896 14 NORFOLK 0-2% C 110 117.5 20 3.79 445.325 MAR-JUN 1896 14 NORFOLK 0-2% SB 40 160 0 3.79 606.4 APR-SEP 15 1896 14 NORFOLK 0-2% W 601144 0 3.79 545.76 SEP-APR 1896 15 NORFOLK 0-2% C 1101 117.5 20 3.38 397.15 MAR-JUN 1896 15 NORFOLK 0-2% S8 40 160 0 3.38 540.8 APR-SEP 15 1896 15 NORFOLK 0-2% W 60 144 0 3.38 486.72 SEP-APR 1896 * 16 NORFOLK 0-2% C 110 117.5 20 4.65 546.375 MAR-JUN 1896 16 NORFOLK 0-2% SB 40 160 0 4.65 744 APR-SEP 15 1896 * 16 NORFOLK 0-2% W 60 144 0 4.65 669.6 SEP-APR 1896 17 NORFOLK 0-2% C 110 117.5 20 4.56 535.8 MAR-JUN 1896 * 17 NORFOLK 0-2% SB 40 160 0 4.56 729.6 APR-SEP 15 1896 * 17 NORFOLK 0-2% W 60 144 0 4.56 656.64 SEP-APR 1896 18 NORFOLK 0-2% C 1101 117.5 20 1.29 151.575 MAR-JUN 1896 18 NORFOLK 0-2% SB 40 160 0 1.29 206.4 APR-SEP 15 1896 18 NORFOLK 0-2% W 60 144 0 1.29 185.76 SEP-APR 1896 * 19 NORFOLK 0-2% C 110 117.5 20 1.14 133.95 MAR-JUN 1896 19 NORFOLK 0-2% SB 40 160 0 1.14 182.4 APR-SEP 15 1896 19 NORFOLK 0-2% W 601 144 0 1.14 164.16 SEP-APR 1896 * 20 NORFOLK 0-2% C 110 117.5 20 1.35 158.625 MAR-JUN 1896 20 NORFOLK 0-2% SB 40 1601 0 1.35 216 APR-SEP 15 1896 20 NORFOLK 0-2% W 60 144 0 1.35 194.4 SEP-APR 1896 * 21 NORFOLK 0-2% C 110 117.5 20 1.52 178.6 MAR-JUN 1896 * 21 NORFOLK 0-2% SB 40 160 0 1.52 243.2 APR-SEP 15 1896 21 NORFOLK 0-2% W 60 144 0 1.52 218.88 SEP-APR 1896 22 NORFOLK 0-2% C 110 117.5 20 3.08 361.9 MAR-JUN 1896 * 22 NORFOLK 0-2% W 60 144 0 3.08 443.52 SEP-APR 1896 22 NORFOLK 0-2% SB 40 160 0 3.08 492.8 APR-SEP 15 1896 * 23 NORFOLK 0-2% C 110 117.5 20 1.55 182.125 MAR-JUN 1896 * 23 INORFOLK 0-2% 1 W 601 144 0 1.55 223.2 SEP-APR Page 2 1896 * 23 NORFOLK D-2% SB 40 160 OF 1.55 248 APR-SEP 15 1896 24 NORFOLK 0-2% C 110 117.5 20 1.27 149.225 MAR-JUN 1896 * 24 NORFOLK 0-2% W 60 144 0 1.27 182.88 SEP-APR 1896 * 24 NORFOLK 0-2% SB 40 160 0 1.27 203.2 APRSEP 15 1896 * 24A NORFOLK 0-2% C 110 117.5 20 1.27 149.225 MAR-JUN 1896 * 24A NORFOLK 0-2% W 60 144 0 1.27 182.88 SEP-APR 1896 * 24A NORFOLK 0-2% SB 40 160 0 1.27 203.2 APR-SEP 15 1896 * 25 NORFOLK 0-2°% C 110 117.5 20 2.62 307.85 MAR-JUN 1896 25 NORFOLK 0-2% W 60 144 0 2.62 377.28 SEP-APR 1896 25 NORFOLK 0-2% SB 40I 160 0 2.62 419.2 APRSEP 15 1896 * 26 NORFOLK D-2°% C 1101 117.5 20 2.93 344.275 MAR-JUN 1896 * 26 INORFOLK D-2% W 60 144 0 2.93 421.92 SEP-APR 1896 26 NORFOLK 0-2°% SB 40 160 0 2.93 468.8 APRSEP 15 1896 * 27 NORFOLK 0-2% C 110 117.5 20 4.1 481.75 MAR-JUN 1896 * 27 NORFOLK 0-2% W 60 144 0 4.1 590.4 SEP-APR 1896 * 27 NORFOLK D-2% SB 40 160 0 4.1 656 APRSEP 15 1896 * 28 NORFOLK 0-2°% C 110 117.5 20 4.1 481.75 MAR-JUN 1896 28 NORFOLK 0-2% W 60 144 0 4.1 590.4 SEP-APR 1896 28 NORFOLK 0-2% SB 40 160 0 4.1 656 APRSEP 15 1896 29 NORFOLK 0-2% C 110 117.5 20 4.18 491.15 MAR-JUN 1895 29 NORFOLK 0-2% W 60 144 0 4.18 601.92 SEP-APR 1896 * 29 NORFOLK 0-2% SB 40 160 0 4.18 668.8 APR-SEP 15 1896 * 30 NORFOLK 0-2% C 110 117.5 20 4.59 539.325 MAR-JUN 1896 * 30 NORFOLK 0-2% W 60 144 0 4.59 660.96 SEP-APR 1896 30 NORFOLK 0-2% SB 40 160 0 4.59 734.4 APR-SEP 15 1896 31 NORFOLK 0-2% BH 6.1 2851 20 0.431 122.55 MAR-OCT 1896 * 31 NORFOLK 0-2% SG 1 501 0 0.431 21.5 SEP-MAY 1896 32 NORFOLK 0-2% BH 6.1 2851 20 0.71 199.5 MAR-OCT 1896 32 NORFOLK 0-2°% SG i 50 0 0.7 35 SEP-MAY 1896 33 NORFOLK 0-2°% BH 6.1 305 0 1.27 387.35 MAR-SEP 1896 - 33 NORFOLK 0-2% SG 1 50 0 1.27 63.5 SEP-APR 1896 34 NORFOLK 0-2% BH 6.1 305 0 1.99 606.95 MARSEP 1896 34 NORFOLK 0-2% SG 1 50 0 1.99 99.5 SEP-APR 1896 35 NORFOLK 0-2% BH 6.1 305 01 2A61 750.3 MAR-OCT 1896 - 35 NORFOLK 0-2% SG 1 50 d 2.46 123 SEP-APR 1896 36 AUTRYVILLE ALL BH 5.5 275 0 1.33 365.75 MARSEP 1896 - 36 AUTRYVILLE ALL SG 1 50 d 1.33 6&5 SEP-APR 1896 37 AUTRYVILLE ALL BH 5.5 275 0 1.73 475.75 MAR-SEP 1896 -. 37 AUTRYVILLE ALL SG 1 50 0 1.73 86.5 SEP-APR 1896 38 AUTRYVILLE ALL BH 5.5 2751 0 1.73 475.75 MARSEP 1896 -- 38 AUTRYVILLE ALL SG 1 501 0 1.73 86.5 SEP-APR 1896 39 AUTRYVILLE ALL BH 5.5 2751 0 1.64 451 MAR-SEP 1896 -- 39 JAUTRYVILLE ALL SG 1 50 0 1.64 82 SEP-APR 1896 40 JAUTRYVILLE ALL BH 5.5 275 0 3.671 1009.25 MAR-OCT 1896 - 40 AUTRYVILLE ALL SG 1 50 0 3.67 183.5 SEP-APR 1896 41 AUTRYVILLE ALL BH 5.5 275 0 1.67 459.25 MAR-OCT 1896 - 41 AUTRYVILLE ALL SG 1 50 0 1.67 83.5 SEP-APR 1896 42 AUTRYVILLE ALL BH 5.5 275 0 3.92 1078 MAR-OCT 1896 42 AUTRYVILLE ALL SG 1 50 0 3.92 196 SEP-APR 1896 43 AUTRYVILLE ALL BH 5.5 275 4 2.01 552.75 MAR-OCT 1896 -- 43 AUTRYVILLE ALL SG 1 50 0 2.01 100.5 SEP-APR 1896 44 AUTRYVILLE ALL BC 4.7 235 0 4.03 947.05 MAR-SEP 1896 -- 44 AUTRYVILLE ALL SG 1 50I 0 4.03 201.5 SEP-APR 1896 45 JAUTRYVILLE ALL BH 5.5 275 0 2.19 602.25 MAR-OCT 1896 -- 45 AUTRYVILLE ALL SG 1 50 0 2.19 109.5 SEP-APR 1896 * 46 AUTRYVILLE ALL C 75 73-751 20 4A3 304.588 MAR-JUN 1896 46 AUTRYVILLE ALL SB 25 100 0 4.13 413 APR-SEP 15 1896 * 46 AUTRYVILLE ALL W 45 103.5 0 4.13 427.455 SEPT-MAR 1896 47 AUTRYVILLE ALL C 75 73.75 20 1.31 96,6125 MAR-JUN Page 3 1896 * 47 AUTRYVILLE ALL W 45 103.5 0 1.31 135.585 SEPT-MAR 1896 47 AUTRYVILLE ALL SB 25 100 0 1.31 131 APR-SEP 15 1896 48 AUTRYVILLE ALL c 75 73.75 20 2.68 197.65 MAR-JUN 1896 48 AUTRYVILLE ALL W 45 103.5 0 2.68 277.38 SEPT-MAR 1896 48 AUTRYVILLE ALL SB 25 100 0 2.68 268 APR-SEP 15 18% 49 AUTRYVILLE ALL C 751 73.751 20 0.75 55.3125 MAR-JUN 1896 49 AUTRYVILLE ALL W 45 103.51 0 0.75 77.625 SEPT-MAR 1896 49 AUTRYVILLE ALL SB 25 100 0 0.75 75 APR-SEP 15 1896 5 NORFOLK 0-2% SG 1 50 0 1.98 99 SEP-APR 1896 5 NORFOLK 0-2% BC 5.2 260 0 1.98 514.8 MAR-SEP 1896 50 AUTRYVILLE ALL C 75 73.75 20 2.161 159.3 MAR-JUN 1896 50 AUTRYVILLE ALL W 45 103.5 0 2.16 223.56 SEPT-MAR 1896 50 UTRYVILLE ALL SB 25 100 0 2.16 216 APR-SEP 15 1896 6 NORFOLK 0-2% SG 1 50 0 6.06 303 SEP-APR 1896 6 NORFOLK 0-2% BC 5.2 260 0 6.06 1575.6 MAR-SEP 1896 7 NORFOLK 0-2% SG 1 50 0 4.86 243 SEP-APR 1896 7 NORFOLK 0-2% BC 5.2 260 6 4.86 1263.6 MAR SEP 1896 8 NORFOLK 0-2% SG l 50 0 4.3 215 SEP-APR 1896 8 NORFOLK 0-2% BC 5.2 260 0 4.3 1118 MAR-SEP 1896 9 NORFOLK 0-2% SG 1 50 0 3.04 152 SEP-APR 1896 9 NORFOLK 0-2% BC 5.2 260 4 3.04 790.4 MARSEP TOTALS: 30721.9 Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals. * Indicates a Crop Rotation NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of NC to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen. Page 4 TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE (Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.) (Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specifications 2.) There are no Acres Leased Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) Or winter annuals follow summer annuals. * Indicates a Crop Rotation * Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in field due to overseeding. **Lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied. The following legend explains the crop codes used in TABLES 1 and 2 above: CROP CODE CROP UNITS LBS WUNIT C CORN BUSHELS 1.25 BC HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-CONTROLLED GRAZED TONS 50 BH HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY TONS 50 SG SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED AC 50 SB SOYBEANS BUSHELS 4 W WHEAT BUSHELS 2.4 W WHEAT J Page 5 TOTALS FROM TABLES 9 AND 2 ACRES LBS AW N USED TABLE 1 129.71 30,722 TOTALS: 129.71 30,722 AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED: 26,496 * BALANCE -4,226 *** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N produced. Acres show in each of the preceeding tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables. NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nurturient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce approximately 4262.4 pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the sludge that will need to be removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when broadcasting the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well special equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge. See the attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water. APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop. Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 5.92 months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in your structure be within 1.63 feet of the top of the dike. If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsiblity of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid. The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts. APPLICATION APPLICATION TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE CROP RATE (inlhr) AINIT (inches) 1896 *20, *21, *22, *23, *24, *24A NORFOLK 0-2% W 0.50 *1 1896 32, -33, -34, -35, --5, 4, -7, NORFOLK 0-2% SG 0,50 *1 1896 *20, *21, *22, *23,'24, *24A NORFOLK 0-2% SB 0.50 *1 1896 '20, •21, *22, *23, *24, *24A NORFOLK 0-2% C 0.50 *1 1896 *31, *32, 33, 34, 35 NORFOLK 0-2% BH 0.50 *1 1896 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 NORFOLK 0-2% BC 0.50 *1 1896 11, *12,'13, -46, •47,'48, 'A AUTRYVILLE ALL W 0.50 *1 1896 -38, -39, -40, -41, -42, -43 AUTRYVILLE ALL SG 0.60 *1 1896 11, *12, *13, *46, *47. *48, • AUTRYVILLE ALL SB 0.60 *1 1896 11, *12, *13, *46, *47, *48, * AUTRYVILLE ALL C 0.60 *1 1896 6, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 4 AUTRYVILLE ALL BH 0.60 j *1 1896 144 AUTRYVILLE ALL BC 0.60 1*1 Page 6 " This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot be applied because the nitrogen limitation. The maximum application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions. Page 7 NARRATIVE OF OPERATION This WUP has been revised to reflect the new Permit and animal numbers on 12/15/00. This WUP utilizes the 50 lb overseed PAN rate instead of the 100 lb overseed PAN rate on small grain. Land application to the bermuda can continue until September 30. Irrigation pulls 40-45 will be sprigged in the spring of 2005. Irrigation design and parameters furnished by the producer and Kraig Westerbeek. In the event the 100 lb overseed option is utilized, the following conditions would have to be observed: (1) no land application on bermuda after August 31, (2) application on small grain would be 50 ibs from Sept 15 - Oct 31 and 50 Ibs in Feb - Mar, with no land application from Nov - Jan, and (3) the small grain must be removed by April 7. Page 8 PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS 1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of Water Quality for every day the discharge continues. 2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has long term access to adequate land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land. 3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other nutrients. 4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or an Altemative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM. (See FOTG Stantard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 Interim Riparian Forest Buffers). 5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field. 6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the NRCS Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.) *7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions conducive to odor or flies and to provide uniformity of application. 8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen. 9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. 10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop on bare soil. 11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following: the outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary Page 9 and from any perennial stream or river (other that an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips) 12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells. 13. Animal Waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by the landownwer. 14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right - of ways. 15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted croplands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the application causes no runoff or drift from the site. *16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system. *17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge. *18. if animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion. *19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site. 20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied as a preemergence with no other applications of animal waste during the crop season. *21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will.be required to mark the maximum storage volume fpr waste storage ponds. 22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for optimum crop production amd maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years. 23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina Department of Page 10 NAME OF FARM: Kalmar II, LLC. OWNER i MANAGER AGREEMENT I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and maintenance precedures estalished in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and/or storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new utilization plan and a new certification to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that I must own or have acces to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs. NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: Claire Kalmar SIGNATURE: �%` �-'� DATE: 2& Nd ( NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner): } please int SIGNATURE: DATE: NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: Robert B. Mitchell Jr. AFFILIATION: Private Technical Specialist ADDRESS (AGENCY): 104 Adler Lane Goldsboro, NC 27530 (919) 736-9406 SIGNATURE: DATE: Page 12 x S 4m It ulav *mom INN MMam" NOUN lb �M Od eassrwylrrwMw+Mwwra,rwwri�IMwlw�rrle "'"`wrry� ` weew�rwre�rw� l rswrwi ,Al �. . r f� tows A low Y ,� ! � ~ ... ICY a Ono!" I1 mom ma.w �► � � ewaoara � • . MI�1rJ0� �R o l��I o A70 A. NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Governor July 11, 2011 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 7010 0290 0003 0833 9991 Claire Reid Kalmar 409 Cole Dr Hampstead, NC 28443 Coleen H. Sullins Director Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION NOV-2011-PC-0415 Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2T .1304 Kalmar II, LLC, Facility No. 31-856, Permit No. AWS310856 Duplin County Dear Claire Reid Kalmar: Dee Freeman Secretary On June 15, 2011, staff of the'NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer Protection Section (APS), inspected the Kalmar II, LLC and the permitted waste management system. We wish to thank Mr. Billy Young, who was present and assisted us during the inspection. As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -discharge permit for the subject animal waste management system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2T..1304, you have been found to be in violation of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) and the Swine Waste System General Permit No. AWG100000 as follows: Violation 1: Failure to maintain a vegetative cover as specified in the facility's CAWT\4P on all land application fields and buffers in accordance to Condition 11. 2. of Swine Waste System General Permit No. AWG 100000. On April 6, 2011, staff noted a crop of peanuts planted in pulls f2p31, f2p32, f8p36, f8p37, f8p38, f8p38. The facility's CAWMP has a Bermuda/small grain overseed rotation noted for those pulls. Required Corrective Action for Violation l : Please provide to our office, a description of activities you plan to take to correct this action. Such activities may include recommendations by a technical specialist or agronomist if appropriate. Wilmington Regional Office One 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405 l�T� OrthC arolilla Phone: 910-796.72151FAX: 910-350-2004 ll Internet: www.ncwatergualify.org An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Customer Service 1-877-623-6748 50%recycled/105 Post Consumer Paper U.S. Postal Service,,., CERTIFIED MAIL., RECEIPT (llomestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) ' For delivery informatio4 visit our vmbsite at www.usps.comn OFFICIAL USE - - PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Ir,structtons Kalmar 11, LLC Notice of Violation 31-856 July 11, 2011 Page 2 of 2 The Division of Water Quality requests that, in addition to the specified corrective action above, please submit the following items on or before August 10, 2011: 1. An explanation from the OlCfor this farm regarding how these violations occurred. 1. A list from the OIC concerning the steps that will be taken to prevent these i olations from occurring in the future. You are required to take any necessary action to correct the above violations on or before August 10, 2011 and to provide a written response to this Notice by August 10, 2011. Please include in your response all corrective actions already taken and a schedule for completion of any corrective actions not addressed. If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact John Farrell at (910)796-7388. Yours very truly, Original S19W691 Charles Stehn9a Charles F. Stehman, Ph.D., P.G. Environmental Program Supervisor III CC.' " APS CAFO Unit Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy Brown LLC John College, DSWC-WiRO DWQ Wilmington Animal Files 31-856 S:%WQSIANIMALSIDUPL]NLOI I WOV31-856 AUG 04 2011 Kalmar II, LLC. Claire Reid Kalmar 409 Cole Drive Hampstead, NC 28443 August 3, 2011 Charles F. Stehman Environmental Program Supervisor III 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405 Subject: NOV/NOV-201-PC-0415 Kalmar II, LLC, Facility No. 31-856 Dear Mr.Stehman: We are replying to you with regard to the NOV that you mailed on July 11, 2011. First I would like to remind you that you forwarded this to Kraig Westerbeek with Murphy Brown, LLC. and our integrator is Maxwell Foods/Goldsboro Hog Farms. We will address the issue per your letter. Violation 1: Failure to maintain a vegetative cover as specified in the facility's CAWMP on all land application fields and buffers in accordance to Conditions II.2. of Swine Waste System General Permit NO. AWG 100000. Farmer planted peanuts on pulls 31,32,36,37,38,39 without notifying us or requesting permission. These pulls have not been needed in our yearly applications in the past but we understand that it is our responsibility to follow the WUP. We have meet with farmer and instructed him on the importance of our WUP and that he will have to in the future stay with our corn, wheat, soybean, coastal, and small grain rotation without any changes. We agree to sprig fields in the spring of year 2012 and will notify DWQ and Maxwell Foods when this has been completed. I would like to state that our facility has been in operation since 1997 and that we have not had a violation at our farm. I know if you check with both DSWC and DWQ inspectors, you will find that I am a very conscientious operator, both from an environmental standpoint and from a regulatory standpoint. I will make sure that we monitor this in the future so this will not happen again. Please contact us with any question or other concerns on this matter. Respectfully submitted, Claire Reid Kalmar -Owner Billy Young-Manager/OIC �� Jul IJ 1 1 VD.JOP MaIrm! ■err a VIULfU9b/4 p.2 ' Nodh Caaina Depwtffmt of M 11 UU Imeslt and Natural Resources Qivlsiott of Weser amity Beady Eaves PeMue Colew H. St W Ow Fran Govemw DIFOCW SeCFetary July 11, 2011 i l l ln' i III I �a C ire Reid Kalanar 409 Cole Dr ffanvdead, NC 29443 Subject: NON 2011-PC-0415 Adnli�VV Code 15A NCA.0 2T .1304 Kalmar II. LLC. Facility M. 31-M Pend No. AWS310856 Dupl n Cumty Dear Claire Reid Kalmar: On Am 15. 2011, staffof the NC DivWw of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer Protectkm Section (APS}, iiaspwwd On IC2bw U. LLC and the PM=t ed waste Managameal systM We Wish m ttnk W B11y Yo n1 & who was prewt and asus during ft hmpeefim As a rea t of this inspertioaa, you are hudyy notified thK having been perud iod to have a non-diw1wryt Permit for the subjeat anu ml waste umagea mt system pursuant to 1SA NCAC xT .I304, you hoe bees formod to be is vi bdm of your Cvoised Aa»ai waste MamMmeat Plan (CAVOM and the Swine Wam System General Permit No. AWGi00000 as folloowm VbAadon 1: Failure to maimtn a vet cover as specified in the &dWs CAVIW an all land application fields and buffers in acoardm a to Cond"i w 112. of Swwm Wam S'ym= Gwad Permit No. AWG1fl6000. On April 6. 2011. staff noted a aW of peanuts plantod in pulls f2p31. $p32, f8p36, 207, f8p38, f8p3s. The facility's CAVW has a Bermsda/smldi gram averseed noted far those pulls. Reyah*ed Corr+eedve Across for Violation 1: Please pravidr to our offir, a dc=pdm of activities you plan to take to cornea this action_ Such activities may include t+o= mendadom by a tecboicai specialist or vpanoudst if appmpriatc. otwos RKxw 910-?%-" 15 / FA& 91(135 6=4 C=V bilerral, www An rp)Woavaft"1►jAft,aa AcftnfitrploW C Js -vs R=Y CIOW10%POO CorwslA9 FOPW 07-13-2011 16:23 CAMELLIA SOW EFRM 19102709574 PAS L KAUL OU A LLIC Notice ory ohmim 31-B56 fitly l 1.2011 Page 2 of 2 The Division of Water Quality requests thak in addition to the specified cotrectim actiom above, phase submit the Foliowing iftm on or befam AmM 10. 2011: 1. An cwfmc�fiwwe ire OX fartJl & jbnn mpwdfng how tkese wdvmaars wcwred 2 A list from the OIC cmammiiRg the steps that uW be takes to p wwnt there Walartlom fmm aamming in the fut>tan; . You are regWred to tOw a" necessary sedan to correct the sbsve violations on or before Agpst 10, 2011 and to prvvkle a writtes respma to tkis Nodes by Awgnst 10, 2011. Plaaae include in your response all can ecbve actions aim* taiaem and a schwhile for completion of any cams ive actions not addressed. . if you bavie any quesdom cps fts. Notice pose oaucc John Fssnell at (410)796-7388. Yoga very tmly, t i e � C hailer F. SUb aam, PhD., P.G. F.nvironEoe�ti Pmgam S�pervisar III cc: APS CAFO Unit Biiny► Mxmk as, Duplin Cmmty sari sad water Coasaervatioa i> ict Kraig Wesesbeck Mmphy Bt c wn LLC John Colhege, DSWC-W5tO DWQ wihdmgton Anima Files 3 i-856 s� t.wooi lQOMt-asa 07-13-2Oi1 16:24 CAMELLIA SOW EFR9 19102709574 PPOGE3 o�oF w R rk�RQ� r --i 0 1<00�!w r -.'� December 14, 2007 Kalmar II LLC Sasan Que Finishing Farm 801 Friendship Church Rd Faison, NC 28341 Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Coleen H. Sullins Director Division of Water Quality DEC 19 RECi) Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310856 Sasan Que Finishing Farm Animal Waste Management System Duplin County Dear Kalmar II LLC: The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge survey information on December 14, 2007. With the survey results, you requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement for the lagoon at the Sasan Que Finishing Farm facility not to be required until 2009. Due to the amounts of treatment volume available, the Division agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until 2009. The results of the 2009 sludge survey are to be.submitted by March 1, 2010. Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at (919) 7l 5-6937. Sincerely, Miressa D. Garoma Soil Scientist cc: Wihiiington.Regional=Office,.Aquifer-ProtectibifSectibn Central Files NCarolina oNaturally Aquifer Protection section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: (919) 733-3221 Internet: www.ncwaterpuality.orQ, Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: (919) 715-0588 Fax 2: (919) 715-6048 An Equal OpporiunitylAtiirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper Customer Service: (877) 623-6748 O QF \N A rFMichael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 0 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality January 3, 2006 CERTIFIED MAII �� 7 1 D RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED g,EC V . Kalmar II, LLC' 3A1A Kalmar 11, LLC - 409 Cole Drive Hampstead NC 28443 ' S Subject: Notification for Phosphorus Loss Assessment Kalmar IL LLC Permit Number NCA231856 Facility 31-856 Duplin County Dear Kalmar II, LLC, There is a condition in your recently issued Animal Waste Management General NPDES Permit addressing phosphorous loss standards. The permit condition quoted below states that if the state or federal government establishes phosphorus loss standards your facility must conduct an evaluation within 180 days. The Federal Natural Resources Conservation Service has now established this standard. A computer -based program was developed to.determine how much phosphorus was being lost from different fields. Instructions on how to comply with this requirement are provided below. In accordance with your NPDES Permit Number NCA231856 Condition 1.6, your facility must now conduct a Phosphorus Loss Assessment. Condition I.6 states: "If prior to the expiration date of this permit either the state or federal government establishes Phosphorus loss standards that are applicable to land application activities at a facility operating under this permit, the Permittee must conduct an evaluation of the facility and its CAWMP under the requirements of the Phosphorus loss standards to determine the facility's ability to comply with the standards. This evaluation must be documented on forms supplied or approved by the Division and must be submitted to the Division. This evaluation must be completed by existing facilities within six (6) months of receiving notification from the Division. Once Phosphorus loss standards are established by the state or federal government that are applicable to facilities applying to operate under this permit, no Certificate of Coverage will be issued to any new or expanding facility to operate under this permit until the applicant demonstrates that the new or expanding facility can comply with these standards." The method of evaluation is the Phosphorous. Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) developed by NC State University and the Natural Resources Conservation Service. PLAT addresses four potential Ioss pathways: leaching, erosion, runoff and direct movement of waste over the surface. Each field must be individually evaluated and rated as either low, medium, high or very high according to its Phosphorus NNo Carolina tarra!!y Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us 2728 Capital Boulevard . . Raleigh, NC 27604 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recydedll0% Post Consumer Paper Phone (919) 733-3221 Customer service Fax (919) 715-0588 - 1-877-623-6748 Fax (919) 715-6048 Kalmar 11, LLC Page 2 ` January 3, 2006 loss potential. The ratings for your farm. must be reported to DWQ using the attached certification form. The PLAT forms must be kept as records on your farm for future reference. From the date of receipt of this letter, a period of 180 days is provided to perform PLAT and return the certification form to DWQ. Only a technical specialist who has received specific training may perform PLAT. You are encouraged to contact a technical specialist now to run PLAT on your farm. Your local Soil and Water Conservation District may be able to provide assistance. This information on the attached form'(s) must be submitted within 180 days of receipt of this letter to: Animal Feeding Operations Unit Division of Water Quality 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 NPDES permitted farms will need to have implemented a nutrient management plan which addresses phosphorus loss before the next permit cycle beginning July, 2007. If you have any fields with a high or very high rating, then your waste utilization plan will require modifications. The purpose of performing PLAT this early is to allow adequate time for making waste plan modifications where necessary. With the next permit, continued application of waste will not be allowed on fields with a very high rating. For fields rated high, only the amount of phosphorus projected to be removed by the harvested crop. For low and medium ratings, phosphorus will not be the limiting factor. Once the PLAT evaluation is completed on your farm, you will know if you have fields that need further work. You are encouraged to begin developing and implementing a strategy to deal with any issues as soon as possible. �. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statue or permitting requirement. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at (919) 715-6697 or the Wilmington Regional Office at (910) 796-7215. Sincerely, Paul Sherman Animal Feeding Operations Unit cc: Wilmington Regional Office Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District Facility File 31-856 o`ao� W A T �9Q0 7 Kalmar II, LLC 409 Cole Drive Hampstead, NC 28443 RE: Sludge Survey Testing Dates CFa`cilify # 31--06 Duplin County Dear Kalmar 11, LLC: ]Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources November 16, 2005 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality NOV 1 $ 1uU!) The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your sludge survey information on February 28, 2005. You have requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement for the lagoon at the Kalmar II Farm. Due to the amount of treatment volume available, DWQ agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until 2006. The 2006 sludge survey must be performed by December 31, 2006, and the results are to be submitted with the Annual Certification Form that will be due on March 1, 2007. Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at (919) 715-6697. Sincerely, f.P�a l Sherman, PE Animal Feeding Operations Unit Supervisor cc: APS Central Files WS; ViI Fningt—on -Regional-Off ce Nam` Carolina �trrra!!y Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 . Phone (919) 733-3221 Customer Service Internet: http://h2o.enr.Mte.ne.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax (919) 715.0588 1-877-623-6748 Fax (919) 715-6048 An Equal OpputunitylAffrmative Action Employer -- 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper O�O� W A T 4�9>�� bLiNUS. XW- pG 1 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Kalmar II, LLC Kalmar II, LLC 409 Cole Drive Hampstead NC 28443 Re: Request for Information Facility Annual Average Kalmar II, LLC NCA231856 Duplin County Dear Kalmar II, LLC: Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources June 21, 2005 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality Based on information submitted with the facility's Animal Facility Annual Certification Form, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is requesting additional information related to the annual average of animals for the year 2004. The Certificate of Coverage (COC) NCA231856 of your NPDES Permit states: "This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Kalmar II, LLC, located in DuplinCounty, with an animal capacity of no greater than an annual average of 11520 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows." The Division received your annual certification form on March 1, 2005. On that form, you indicated that your annual average was 12,092. This exceeds the annual average specified in your COC of 11,520 Feeder to Finish. To avoid possible enforcement action for a violation of your permit, please submit the facility's stocking records for the year 2004 within thirty (30) days to the following address: ��9Carolina JVatura!!rf Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone (919) 733-3221 Customer Service Internet: httpJfh2o.enr.state.ne.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax (919) 715-0588 1-877-623-6748 Fax (919)715-6048 / An Equal OpportunityfAffrmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper Kalmar 11, LLC Page 2 June 21, 2005 Keith Larick Division of Water Quality 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 =RE Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statue or permitting requirement. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at (919) 715-6185 or the Wilmington Regional Office at (910) 796-7215. Sincerely, Keith Larick Animal Feeding Operations Unit cc: File 31-856 Wilmington Regional Office PSI Rt. 7 Bog 510,��vE� Rocky Mount, NC 27803 2524W 4690 Lagoon Sludge Survey Form Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number Sasangto Farm DWQ # 31-856 Lagoon Identification Laa oon # 1 Pemson(s) Taking Measurements Chad Pridgen Date of Measurements 02/25/04 Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of: a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer: Plastic round disc connected to a aluminum wive b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soil) of the lagoon: 1 inch PVC pipe with end cap c. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler": N/A Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): 6.8 acres Estimate number of sampling points: a. Less than 1.33 acres: Use 8 points b. If more than 1.33 acres: 6.$ acres x 6= 24 , with maximum of 24. At the time of the sludge survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gauge pole): 0.4 Ft (tenths) Determine the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the Minimum Liquid Level 3.4 Ft (tenths) The distance from the present liquid surface level to the Minimum Liquid Level Ft(tenths) Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level to the lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points): 12.83 Ft (tenths) Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level to the top of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points): 11.02 Ft (tenths) Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer. 1.81 Ft (tenths) Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zane: 8.02 Ft (tenths) * Note: If the calculated thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone is less than 4 feet, a sludge removal and utilization plan may be required by N.C. DWQ. See your specific permit or contact DWQ for more information. Completed By: Chad Pridgen Printed Name Signature 02/25/04 Date PSI Rt. 7 Box 510 -. Rocky Mount, NC 27803 252-8834690 Sludge Survey Data Sheet Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number Sasanqua Farm DWQ # 31-856 Lagoon Identification Lagoon # 1 Person(s) Taking Measurements Chad Pridgen Date of Measurements 02/25/04 Grid Point Number Distance from liquid surface to to of slud a Distance from liquid surface to lagoon bottom soil Thickness of sludge laver Feet tenths Feet tenths Feet tenths 1 13.7 15.7 2 2 13.4 14.6 1.2 3 11.2 13.5 2.3 4 12 14.5 2.5 5 10.3 12.5 2.2 6 9.8 12.4 2.6 7 9.8 11.8 2 8 10.5 12.2 1.7 9 10.8 12.3 1.5 10 11.2 12.5 1.3 11 11.7 12.6 0.9 12 11.7 12.7 1 13 11 12.6 1.6 14 11.2 12.7 1.5 15 10.8 12.2 1.4 16 11.1 12.2 1.1 17 10.8 12.4 1.6 18 11.1 12.5 1.4 19 11.2 12.4 1.2 20 10.3 12.2 1.9 21 10.5 12 1.5 22 9.7 13.6 3.9 23 10 12.7 2.7 24 10.6 13 2.4 Averse 11.02 Ft (tenths) 12.83 Ft (tenths) 1.81 Ft (tenths) 12sz- 'L�j, (70/ oil 1-1 131 61 Cr4 'IZ rC -5 r F, Q5 CDO I f- 2-4 ANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATIO Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number /1/(�,q �L�„ County Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) KAIMA&(' Operator in Charge for this Facility Aape_ 1�ee,te�e Certification # ,s4z9Z Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year V-11,_ YES NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part II and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste was generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled. Part I : Facipy Information: 1. Total number of application Fields ❑ or Pulls @(please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): d %- Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP 2. Total number of Fields ❑ or Pulls Q�please check the appropriate box) on which land application occurred during the year: , al Total Acres on which waste was applied _ 110, $ j 3. Total- pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the yearfor all application sites: 4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and. the.pernut:- 5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken off site during the year /yo ALA __ tons U. or -gallons ❑ (please check the appropriate box) 6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year: cl 7. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year: LargestSmallest— Al D 7 a -- - - - - (These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit oh the number of animals at the facility. is the annual average members) 8. Facility's Integrator if applicable: Go ;-Ai Co. 6.11 Part II: Facili Status: IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE. 1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during RrYes= 0 No the past calendar year. AFACF 3-14-03 2. The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from IP�es ❑ No the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during the past calendar year. 3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past P'Yes ❑ No calendar year. 4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during &KYes ❑ No the past calendar year. S. There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the U Yes ❑ No levels specified in this facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year. 6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year. Q�Yes ❑ No 7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon 2 Yes ElNo was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume for which the lagoon was designed. S. A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification. ❑ Yes .WNo 9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the P Yes ❑ No past calendar year. 10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year? L Yes ❑ No 11. All .required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's WYes ❑ No permit during the past calendar year. 12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during R Yes. ❑ No the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization- was received from the Division of Water Quality. 13. Crops as specified in the CAWMP were maintained during the past calendar year on all ►ryes ❑ No sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with the facility's permit. 14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility-weie Dyes 0 No maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year. "1 certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. -I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations." or Signature of Permittee yignature of operator in un if different from Permittee) Date ate AFACF 3-14-03 2 Sasanqua 801 Friendship Faison, NC Telephone: (910) 293-3222 February 25, 2005 To Whom It May Concern: Farms Church Road 28341 Fax: (910) 293-2257 F E9' 2 8 .4uuti ma On behalf of Sasanqua Farms, I am requesting a reprieve from having a Lagoon Sludge Survey done in 2005. I am enclosing a copy of Sasanqua Farms' Lagoon Sludge Survey Form for the year 2004. We believe there will not be a difference in the Lagoon Sludge Survey done in 2004 and the results from a survey if done in 2005. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Roger Wheeler Farm Manager ANIMAL FACILITY A_�NUAL CERTIFICATION FORM Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number V C County J) UO 1, �j Year 200 Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) k Fl ! ; T 1 _ Operator in Charge for this Facility �� r,-) 12, I k - Certification #J t,c_t. ' 16-99 - Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year `1X YES NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part II and proceed to the certification. Also, if anitr:al waste was generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled. Part I : Facility Information: 1. Total number of application Fields 9 or Pulls 30 (please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): & _ Total Useable Acres approved in the CAUrNIP ilos 7 - 2. Total number of Fields ❑ or Pulls S (please check the appropriate box) on which land application occurred during the year: - 2 7 Total Acres on which waste was applied _9.S b * 3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites: 3 711 .S 4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and the permit: �2 S. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken off site during the year N O 4E tons ❑ or gallons L (please check the appropriate box) 6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year: 23JU 7. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year: Largest 9 S'b O Smallest (These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals at the facility is the annual average numbers) 8. Facility's Integrator if applicable: Part H.- Facility Status: IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE. 1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during Yes ❑ No the past calendar year. RECEIVED AFACF 3.14-03 MAR 4 1. 2004 • r;!:i'.�LL S.I. 2. The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from II Yes CJ No the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during the past calendar year. 3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past ❑ Yes ;0 No calendar year. 4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during ❑ Yes 91 No the past calendar year. 5. There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the ❑ Yes �'i No levels specified in this facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year. 6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year. Yes ❑ No 7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon ❑ Yes No was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume for which the lagoon was designed. S. LAop of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for dais facility is attached to this Certification. CJ Yes 0 No Cy1�uv:il �� ma,i�a by .� ri A42h9. ual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the Yes ❑ No past calendar year. 10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year? I Yes ❑ No 11. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's Yes ❑ No permit during the past calendar year. 12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during R Yes ❑ No the past calendar year or; in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality. 13. Crops as specified in the CAVI'MP were maintained during the past calendar year on all Yes ❑ No sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with the facility's permit. 14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were Yes ❑ No maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year. "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations." C riJLt� v-� or print) ,Zf.4nature of operator in k-n; (if different from Permittee) AFACF 3-14-03 2 Zt1D Z/- - D to Date State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources CEIv� Division of Water Quality N0U 19 2001 Michael F. Easley, Governor In. William G. Ross Jr., Secretary Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED CtAtRE KALmAR 409 CoLE DRIVE HAmpsTEAD NC 28443 Dear Claire Kalmar: A, 110 F4CDENR NpRTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES November 15, 2001 Subject: Notice of Violation and Revocation for Nonpayment Camellia Farm No. 2 Permit Number: AWS310856 Duplin County In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 OG, all animal operations who receive an animal waste management system permit will be charged in each year of the term an annual permit fee. Annual permit fees are billed following the issuance of the permit and then annually thereafter on the anniversary of that date. Your animal waste management system permit was issued on 8/4/1997. Your annual permit fee for the period of 8/4/2001 - 8/3/2002 is $300.00. Your payment was due 10/18/2001. Because this fee was not fully paid within 30 days after being billed, this letter initiates action to revoke the subject permit, pursuant to 15 NCAC 2H .0205 (c) (4). and G.S. 143-215.1 (b) (3). Effective 60 days from receipt of this notice, the subject permit is hereby revoked unless the required Annual Animal Waste Management System Permit fee for your animal operation is received within that time. Operation of an animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and is subject to the assessment of a civil penalty of up to $10;000 per day. Your payment should be sent to: N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Budget Office 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 If you have any questions, please contact Fran McPherson at (919) 733-7015 ext. 210. Sincerely, `A Thorpe, h D. cc: Non -Discharge Branch Compliance/Enforcement Unit [Wilmington Regional.Offtce= Dupiin County Health Department Permit File 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone 919-733-5083 FAX 919-733-9919 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled 110% post -consumer paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment OUT 2 3 2060 and Natural Resources _ L Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director October 11, 2000 Claire Kalmar Camellia Farm No. 2 409 Cole Drive Hampstead NC 28443 1A 4 4 NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPAR-rMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Subject: Certificate of Coverage No_ AWS310856 Camellia Farm No. 2 Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and Application System Duplin County Dear Claire Kalmar: In accordance with your request received on October 2, 2000, we are forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Claire Kalmar, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Camellia Farm No. 2, located in Duplin County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 11,520 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). Prior to population introducing waste into the anaerobic lagoon, a new Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) written for 11,520 Feeder to Finish swine shall be submitted to the Division of Water Quality, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh North Carolina 27699-1617 and the Division of Water Quality, Wilmington Regional Office, 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington North Carolina 28405-3845. The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003, and shall hereby void COC No_ AWS310856 dated June 26, 1998. This COC is to acknowledge the relocation and redesign of the anaerobic lagoon for 11,520 Feeder to Finish swine. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals. Based on documentation submitted to the Division, it is our determination that the anaerobic lagoon authorized by this COC.and previous COC's issued August 4, 1997 and June 26, 1998 is required to meet the siting requirements that applied to this facility when the origianal COC was issued. 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone 919-733-5083 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper Certificate of Coverage AWS310956 Camellia Farm No. 2 Page 2 While we would strongly encourage you to maximize the separation distances from your property lines and your neighbors, the siting requirements contained in NCGS 106-803 do not appear to apply to your proposed lagoon. Please be advised however that the Division has not been authorized to administer provisions of the Swine Farm Siting Act (Act). The interpretation given reflects our internal policies for administering the animal waste management system program. If you have questions regarding your individual rights or responsibilities under the Act, you should consider obtaining private legal counsel - Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143- 215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief. Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division. This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership. If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding. The subject farm is located in the Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff may be reached at (910) 395-3900. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at (919) 733-5083 ext. 502. ZSincer Kerr T. Stevens cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's) Duplin County Health Department ilauz�git�n_)gi�l�Qifice; on Duplin Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District Permit File NDPU Files State of North Carolina1712 Department of Environment ,LT?WA • and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality RECF'1V D James B. Hunt, Jr., Govern r AUG 14 NUO Bill Holman, Secretary BY: NCDENR Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL RF-50URCF-S August 10, 2000 Claire Kalmar Camellia Farm No. 2 409 Cole Drive Hampstead, North Carolina 28443 Subject: Facility Number 31-856 Camellia Farm -No. 2 Duplin County Dear Ms. Kalmar: This letter is in response to questions.regarding your animal waste management system posed to the Division of Water Quality (DWQ). You have requested the DWQ to respond to your inquiry regarding the possibility of converting the current innovative animal waste management system at the Camellia Farm No. 2 to a conventional anaerobic lagoon system. On August 4, 1997, the Division of Water Quality issued a Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310856 (COC) under the DWQ General Pen -nit to you for the Camellia Farm No. 2. Although an innovative animal waste management system has since been permitted and constructed at this facility, the DWQ did not revoke the COC to operate a conventional animal waste management system under the Swine Waste Operation General Permit. Therefore, the COC for this system is still valid. The August 4, 1997 COC is for an open-air anaerobic lagoon and spray irrigation system designed' for a 11,520 Feeder to Finish swine facility. Therefore, an anaerobic lagoon system that you install at your farm shall not serve more than 11,520 feeder to finish swine. A larger system would constitute an expansion and would violate the current moratorium on construction or expansion of swine farms as enacted in House Bill 515. In 1997, the General Assembly enacted HB 515 which amended the Swine Farm Siting act to require more stringent siting criteria_ If you decide to construct the 11,520 Feeder to Finish anaerobic lagoon and spray irrigation system at Camellia Farm No_ 2, DWQ will require you to submit additional information so that it can identify the siting criteria that applies to this facility. In order for the old setback criteria (criteria in existence prior to HB 515) to apply to your facility, construction must have begun on the waste system that was permitted under the August 4, 1997 COC, by the date that HB 515 became effective, which was August 27, 1997. Additionally, even if construction took place prior to the effective date of the Act, (August 27, 1997) the old setbacks apply to your facility only if construction at the site was undertaken in reliance on the August 4, 1997 permit. Therefore, construction must have taken place at your facility between the dates of August 4, 1997 and August 27, 1997 for the old setbacks to apply to a waste system that you based on the August 4, 1997 permit. 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone 919-733-5083 Fax 919-715-6048 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper Camellia Farm No. 2 August 10, 2000 Page 2 If you wish to construct the open air`anaerobic lagoon and sprayfield system authorized under the August 4, 1997 COC, please provide DWQ with documentation that clearly demonstrates that you commenced construction of the site in reliance on the permit between the dates of August 4, 1997 and August 27, 1997. In addition, please provide DWQ with documentation whether or not your lagoon will be located in the 100-year flood plain_ In the event that construction was not undertaken between the dates of August 4, 1997 and August 27, 1997, you may install the lagoon system permitted under the August 4, 1997 COC provided that the system meets or exceeds the siting requirements (copy attached) contained in HB 515 and complies with all other conditions of the COC. DWQ will review any documentation that you provide regarding commencement of construction at your facility and will provide you with a final decision regarding the siting criteria you will be required to meet. Please feel free to contact Sue Homewood or Kim Colson of our staff at 919-733-5083 extensions 502 and 540 if you have any comments or questions. fDennis Ramsey, Assistant Chief Non -Discharge Branch Cc: Wilmin on Regional-OffceiWater Quality Section Mary Dee Canaw y Attorney General's Office George Pettus, Goldsboro Hog Farms Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Facility File 31-856 Permit File AWS310856 Permit File AWI310856 State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality F EVE James B. Hunt, Jr., Govern r AUG � Bill Holman, Secretary BY: Kerr T. Stevens, Director August 10, 2000 Claire Kalmar Camellia Farm No. 2 409 Cole Drive Hampstead, North Carolina 28443 1 �WA � NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Subject: Facility Number 31-856 Camellia Farm -No. 2 Duphn County Dear Ms. Kalmar: This letter is 'in response to questions regarding your animal waste management system posed to the Division of Water Quality (DWQ). You have requested the DWQ to respond to your inquiry regarding the possibility of converting the current innovative animal waste management system at the Camellia Farm No. 2 to a conventional anaerobic lagoon system. On August 4, 1997, the Division of Water Quality issued a Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310856 (COC) under the DWQ General Permit to you for the Camellia Farm No. 2. Although an innovative animal waste management system has since been permitted and constructed at this facility, the DWQ did not revoke the COC to operate a conventional animal waste management system under the Swine Waste Operation General Permit. Therefore, the COC for this system is still valid. The August 4, 1997 COC is for an open-air anaerobic lagoon and spray irrigation system designed for a 11,520 Feeder to Finish swine facility. Therefore, an anaerobic lagoon system that you install at your farm shall not serve more than 11,520 feeder to finish swine- A larger system would constitute an expansion and would violate the current moratorium on construction or expansion of swine farms as enacted in House Bill 515. In 1997, the General Assembly enacted HB 515 which amended the Swine Farm Siting act to require more stringent siting criteria. If you decide to construct the 11,520 Feeder to Finish anaerobic lagoon and spray irrigation system at Camellia Farm No. 2, DWQ will require you to submit additional information so that it can identify the siting criteria that applies to this facility. In order for the old setback criteria (criteria in existence prior to HB 515) to apply to your facility, construction must have begun on the waste system that was permitted under the August 4, 1997 COC, by the date that HB 515 became effective, which was August 27, 1997. Additionally, even if construction took place prior to the effective date of the Act, (August 27, 1997) the old setbacks apply to your facility only if construction at the site was undertaken in reliance on the August 4, 1997 permit. Therefore, construction must have taken place at your facility between the dates of August 4, 1997 and August 27, 1997 for the old setbacks to apply to a waste system that you based on the August 4, 1997 permit. 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone 919-733-5083 Fax 919-715-6048 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper Camellia Farm No. 2 August 10, 2000 Page 2 If you wish to construct the open air anaerobic lagoon and sprayf eld system authorized under the August 4, 1997 COC, please provide DWQ with documentation that clearly demonstrates that you commenced construction at the site in reliance on the permit between the dates of August 4, 1997 and August 27, 1997. In addition, please provide DWQ with documentation whether or not your lagoon will be located in the 100-year flood plain_ In the event that construction was not undertaken between the dates of August 4, 1997 and August 27, 1997, you may install the lagoon system permitted under the August 4, 1997 COC provided that the system meets or exceeds the siting requirements (copy attached) contained in HB 515 and complies with all other conditions of the COC. DWQ will review any documentation that you provide regarding commencement of construction at your facility and will provide you with a final decision regarding the siting criteria you will be required to meet. Please feel free to contact Sue Homewood or Kim Colson of our staff at 919-733-5083 extensions 502 and 540 if you have any comments or questions. Dennis Ramsey, Assistant Chief Non -Discharge Branch Cc: 5 } mtn 5%RegianaI O ice Water Quality Section Mary Dee Can away, Attorney General's Office George Pettus, Goldsboro Hog Fauns Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Facility File 31-856 Permit File AWS310856 Permit File AW1310856 State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director Mr. Robert O. Hofiland, P.E. Hofiland Environmental, Inc. 10391 Silver Springs Road Conroe, Texas 77303 Dear Mr. Hoffland; RECEIVE 4 • • MAY 3 I ZD00 CDENRBY: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES May 23, 2000 Subject: Modification of Permit AW1310856 Camellia Farms No_ 2 Duplin County Your letter to Mr. Kerr T. Stevens, dated May 1, 2000 has been referred to me for a response. In order to modify an animal waste management system permit, a formal application must be submitted by the owner of the facility. I have enclosed an application for your convenience. There will be portions of the application that will not be applicable to the type of system you have described, you may leave those portions blank. Most importantly is the signature of the applicant and.Prof--ssional Engineer. The specific system modifications should be submitted as additional documents. If a permit modification request is submitted, it must be accompanied by engineering drawings, calculations, equipment specifications, construction specifications, explanations of all assumptions, and documentation of results from the similar system at the White Oak Farm. All assumptions, calculations, and equipment and construction specifications should be submitted under the seal of a North Carolina Registered Professional Engineer. Permit requests are reviewed in as timely a manner as possible; however, please be aware that the Division of Water Quality is experiencing significant staff shortages which lengthens review times. Typical permitting review takes up to 90 days from date of receipt of a complete permit application. Please feel free to contact me at 919-733-5083 extension 502, should' you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Sincerely, ue Homewood Cc: Claire Kalmar, facility owner tW.ilmington_Regional-Office; Water-Quality§upervisort Permit File AWI310856 George Pettus, Goldsboro Milling Company 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone 919-733-5083 Fax 919-715-6048 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post-c6nsumer paper [Fwd: FW: Facility #31-856] Subject: [Fwd: FW: Facility #31-8561 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 08.41:51 -0400 From: Dean Hunkele <Dean.Hunkele@ncmaiI.net> Organization: NC Division of Water Quality -- Wilmington Regional To: Stonewall Mathis <Stonewall.Mathis@ncmail.net> Subject: FW: Facility #31-856 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 08:33:52 -0400 From: George Pettus <ici1427@icomnet.com> Organization: Goldsboro Milling Company To: "Tommy Stevens (E-mail)" <Tommy.Stevens@ncmail.net>, "Sue Homewood (E-mail)" <Sue.Homewood@ncmail.net> CC: "Dean Hunkele (E-mail)" <Dean.Hunkeie@ncmail.net>, "Bob Ivey (E-mail)" <bivey@gmcom.net> Has any decision been reached on the setbacks and buffers that will have to be adhered to with the submittal of another alternative proposal or lagoon system? You realize that without this decision, we are unable to do anything or make decisions on what system(s) to explore. The available surface area is critical and the buffer constraints impact that dramatically. We eagerly await a decision. Thank you. George H. Pettus -----Original Message ----- From: George Pettus Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 10:14 AM To: Tommy Stevens (E-mail); Sue Homewood (E-mail) Cc: Dean Hunkele (E-mail); Bob Ivey (E-mail) Subject: Facility #31-856 I am writing this letter requesting information and a possible ruling on the future status of this facility. As I am sure you all are aware of, this is the facility in Duplin County with Alternative Technology that has failed. It is owned by Ms. Claire Kalmar and grows finishing hogs under contract for Goldsboro Hog Farms. To date, we (Goldsboro Hog Farms has contributed $60,000 +) have installed underground hydrants to facilitate land application on over 100 acres of land. Approximately 55 acres of the land had a cover crop and the owner is now in the process of sprigging bermuda grass on the entire acreage. In the interim of the failed system, the owner has been utilizing this acreage to manage the waste being generated at this facility. The buildings are pit recharge buildings, so the management at the facility can pull plugs and release waste to the holding pond in a manner that allows them to facilitate the proper land application and manage the liquid level in the pond. They are also utilizing the Consume product manufactured by Spartan Chemicals to break down the solids in the buildings and reduce the ammonia levels in the buildings, as well as reducing the N level in the liquid. As directed by DWQ/WiRO, they are in the process of closing the equalization basin that failed. The liquid and solids are being pumped out and land applied and the failed tank will be removed and the area properly backfilled and closed. As storage capacity and land and crop conditions allow, the remaining tanks will be pumped out, land applied and closed and the system will be disassembled. Their options, as discussed with DWQ/WiRO would be to install another alternative technology or install the original anaerobic lagoon (permitted 1 of 2 04/24/2000 9.55 AM ' _ f [Fwd: FW: Facility #31-856] 8/4/97). The lagoon as applied for and permitted in 1997 would not be physically located where it was originally planned, as when the alternative technology was installed, the buildings and waste system were reconfigured. A question that continues to plague us is whether we can adhere to the setbacks that were in place at the time the facility was originally permitted and construction began or if we will have to adhere to the more current and stringent setbacks (particularly the 500 ft buffer to property lines). Ms Kalmar needs an answer to this question in order to move forward with getting this system replaced and functioning properly. She is waiting on a proposal and amendment from Bob Hoffland with Hoffland Environmental on an alternative system for this facility. He has the system currently in operation at White Oak Farms in Wayne Co. that utilizes a separator, clarifier and holding ponds. Even with his proposal, there will need to be additional storage capacity (another holding pond) and the buffers and setback issues are still critical. Tommy and Sue, we have been directed to contact you and that it would be your decision on what setbacks and buffers this facility will have to adhere to. Please be mindful of all the facts. In addition, Ms. Kalmar has spent $300,000 + on the system that failed and has incurred an additional $100,000 + in expenses since, trying to keep the facility sustainable, in order to not be financially bankrupt. It is indeed a bad situation and we need your assistance and guidance. She installed alternative technology with a Permit in hand to install an anaerobic lagoon, trying to do what the public and our politicians were advocating at the time. She is backed against the wall and is in a very precarious situation with the potential to lose everything financially. I will be glad to discuss this with you at your convenience. George H. Pettus Environmental Management Maxwell Foods Inc / Goldsboro Hog Farms Dean Hunkeie <Dean.Hunke1e@ncmai1.net> Environmental Specialist Division of Water Quality Environment & Natural Resources 2 of 2 04/24/2000 9:55 AM [Fwd: FaciEty 931-856] Camefia 42 Subject: [Fwd: Facility #31-8561 Camelia #2 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 14:19:17 -0500 From: Dean Hunkele <Dean.Hunkele@ncmail.net> Organization: NC Division of Water Quality -- Wilmington Regional To: Rick Sliver <Rick.Shiver@ncmail.net> CC: Stonewall Mathis <Stonewall.Mathis@ncmail.net> Subject: Facility #31-856 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 10:14:27 -0500 From: George Pettus <ici1427@icomnet.com> Organization: Goldsboro Milling Company To: "Tommy Stevens (E-mail)" <Tommy.Stevens@ncmaiLnet>, "Sue Homewood (E-mail)" <Sue.Homewood@ncmail.net> CC: "Dean Hunkele (E-mail)" <Dean.Hunkele@ncmaiLnet>, "Bob Ivey (E-mail)" <bivey@gmcom.net> I am writing this letter requesting information and a possible ruling on the future status of this facility. As I am sure you all are aware of, this is the facility in Duplin County with Alternative Technology that has failed_ It is owned by Ms. Claire Kalmar and grows finishing hogs under contract for Goldsboro Hog Farms. To date, we (Goldsboro Hog Farms has contributed $60,000 +) have installed underground hydrants to facilitate land application on over 100 acres of land. Approximately 55 acres of the land had a cover crop and the owner is now in the process of sprigging Bermuda grass on the entire acreage. In the interim of the failed system, the owner has been utilizing this acreage to manage the waste being generated at this facility. The buildings are pit recharge buildings, so the management at the facility can pull plugs and release waste to the holding pond in a manner that allows them to facilitate the proper land application and manage the liquid level in the pond_ They are also utilizing the Consume product manufactured by Spartan Chemicals to break down the solids in the buildings and reduce the ammonia levels in the buildings, as well as reducing the N level in the liquid. As directed by DWQ/WiRO, they are in the process of closing the equalization basin that failed. The liquid and solids are being pumped out and land applied and the failed tank will be removed and the area properly backfilled and closed_ As storage capacity and land and crop conditions allow, the remaining tanks will be pumped out, land applied and closed and the system will be disassembled. Their options, as discussed with DWQ/WiRO would be to install another alternative technology or install the original anaerobic lagoon (permitted 8/4/97). The lagoon as applied for and permitted in 1997 would not be physically located where it was originally planned, as when the alternative technology was installed, the buildings and waste system were reconfigured - A question that continues to plague us is whether we can adhere to the setbacks that were in place at the time the facility was originally permitted and construction began or if we will have to adhere to the more current and stringent setbacks (particularly the 500 ft buffer to property lines). Ms Kalmar needs an answer to this question in order to move forward with getting this system replaced and functioning properly. She is waiting on a proposal and amendment from Bob Hoffland with Hoffland Environmental on an alternative system for this facility. He has the system currently in operation at White Oak Farms in Wayne Co. that utilizes a separator, clarifier and holding ponds. Even with his proposal, there will need to be 1 of 2 07/05/2000 11:47 AM [Fwd: Facility #31-856] Camelia 42 additional storage capacity (another holding pond) and the buffers and setback issues are still critical. Tommy and sue, we have been directed to contact you and that it would be your decision on what setbacks and buffers this facility will have to adhere to. Please be mindful of all the facts. In addition, Ms. Kalmar has spent $300,000 + on the system that failed and has incurred an additional $100,000 + in expenses since, trying to keep the facility sustainable, in order to not be financially bankrupt. It is indeed a bad situation and we need your assistance and guidance. She installed alternative technology with a Permit in hand to install an anaerobic lagoon, trying to do what the public and our politicians were advocating at the time. She is backed against the wall and is in a very precarious situation with the potential to lose everything financially. I will be glad to discuss this with you at your convenience. George H. Pettus Environmental Management Maxwell Foods Inc / Goldsboro Hog Farms Dean Hunkele <Dean.Hunkele@ncmail.net> Environmental Specialist Division of Water Quality Environment & Natural Resources 2 of 2 07/05/2000 11:47 AM [Fwd: Sasanqua update] 1 `31-8s6 Subject: [Fwd: Sasanqua update] Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 12:45:46 -0500 From: Dean Hunkele <Dean.Hunkele@ncmail.net> Organization: NC Division of Water Quality -- Wilmington Regional To: Rick Shiver <Rick.Shiver@ncmail.net> CC: BRUCE PARRIS <BRUCE.PARRIS@ncmail.net>, Stonewall Mathis <Stonewall.Mathis@ncmail.net>, Sue Homewood <sue.homewood@ncmail.net> Subject: Sasanqua update Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 11:51:25 -0500 From: George Pettus <icil427@icomnet.com> Organization: Goldsboro Milling Company To: "Dean Hunkele (E-mail)" <Dea.n.Hunkele@ncmail.net> Dean: I apologize for not responding to your voice mail sooner, but it continues to be crazy here. I have a call in to Hoffland Environmental and Ms Kalmar seeking the proposal on his system. I am working with a surveyor to determine if we have enough room to meet buffer and setback requirements and design a lagoon to handle the waste being generated by the finishing operation. Since the meeting with you and other interested agency parties, the rest of the irrigation system has been installed and there are now hydrants accessing the acreage in the WUP. The failed equalization tank is being pumped out and they are in the process of completing that and.closing out that area. The Consume product is still being used in the buildings to help liquefy solids and lower the N content. The 110 acres will be sprigged with bermuda grass either this week or next, depending on when the contractor can get to it. He was contacted within days after our last meeting with you, and Mike Jernigan has been in regular contact with him, encouraging him to sprig it as soon as possible. I will update you further as I have additional information. At this point in time, Sasanqua is able to manage the waste being generated and released from the buildings with the irrigation system in place. George H. Pettus Maxwell Foods Inc / Goldsboro Hog Farms Dean Hunkele <Dean.HunkeleAncmail.net> Environmental Specialist Division of Water Quality Environment & Natural Resources 1 of 1 06/02/2000 8:37 AM Plan Amendment to Include. S&WCC Chronic Rainfall Practices and Standards through March 31, 2000 1. if this facility can comply with its existing permit and CAWMP it must do so. -- - 2. Temporary Addition of New Sprayfields (#XChnk-appropriate bones.) 0 A. acres of cropland. List crop types used: 0 B. acres of hardwood woodland @ I00 lbs PAN / acre added_ . 0 C. acres of pine woodland added @ 60 lbs PAN / acre added. 3. Summer Perennial Grass (Check appropriate box.) 0 A. Application window extended for acres of perennial grass until first killing frost. 0 B. An additional 50 Ibs of PAN applied to acres of perennial grass prior to killing frost. 4. PAN Application Increased for Small Grains & Winter Grasses to be harvested. (Check appropriate box.) )KA. PAN application increased up to 200 lbs per acre for 8 011 acres of small grains or winter grasses to be harvested. 0 B. PAN application increased up to 150 Ibs per acre for acres of overseeded summer perennial included in 3. B_ 5. Waste Analysis (Check appropriate box.) 0 A. Prior to December 1", 1999 the calculation of PAN will be based on a 35% reduction of the last analysis taken prior to the first 25 year 24 hour storm event. (Current waste analysis must be used after Dec.1'2 .) )�B. Use current waste analysis to determine PAN. 6. Required -Maximum Nitrogen Utilization Measures for Small Grains and Winter Grasses. A. Use of higher seeding rates, B. Timely harvest of forage to increase yield, and C. Irrigating during periods of warmer weather. 7. Required -Irrigation Management Techniques to Reduce Runoff and Ponding Potential. A. Making frequent, light irrigation applications, and B. Not irrigating immediately before predicted rainfall. 8. The owner / manager is required to manage the movement of animals to and from the facility to minimize environmental impacts, ensure compliance with the facility's permit and amended CAWMP, and avoid discharge to surface waters. 9. Authorization to use the additional practices included in this amendment expires if a facility discharges to surface waters. Any discharge is a violation and may result in an enforcement action. 10. The owner / operator is required to keep records of all waste applications. 11. This revision must include a map or sketch of new land application areas. Facility Number 3 1- 9 5 6 ►41kE SE'l Ri&AW Facility Owner / Manager Name (HFV - Facility Ckvner / Mafiager Signature Date U KDV IR CA-MaVA F*FZM N0. Z (5A5A-N,2V_A Facility Name C�Pt N. FeT TTuS Technical Specialist Name (PRINT) ec cal Specialist Signature Date 26 NDV qq This document must be filed at the SWCD office and be attached to the facilities CAWMP and be available for inspection at the facility. (*) New temporary sprayfields must meet applicable buffer and setback requirements. Waste must not be applied to wetlands. 11/I 1/1999 State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Wilmington Regional Office James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary Division of Water Quality CERTIFIED MAIL Z153 ' 116 179 RETCIRN RECEIPT REQUESTED Date: November 1, 1999 Ms. Claire Kalmar Kalmar I, L. L. C. Camellia Farm No.2 409 Cole Drive Hampstead, North Carolina 28443 Subject: . Notice of Violation Camellia Farm No.2 Permit No. AWI310856 Duplin County Dear Ms. Kalmar: NCDENR NORr1.1 CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENv1RONMENr AND NArURAL RESOURCES You will find attached a copy of the completed form entitled "Compliance Inspection Report". The report summarizes the findings of a recent inspection which was conducted on October 22, 1999 to determine compliance with permit requirements. A summary of findings and comments noted during the inspection are listed in Section "D" of the subject report. It is requested that you respond in writting to this Office within 10 days of the receipt of this letter and provide corrective action details for Items 1,4,5,6,&7. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact me at the Wilmington Regional Office, telephone number (910) 395-3900. Sincerely, Rick Shiver Water Quality Regional Supervisor JB: CA11]ELIL A . o99 CC: Bob Ivey (Goldsboro Milling Co) Mike Jernigan (Camellia Farm) Dave Anderson (Waste Technical Serivices, Inc.) Stoney Mathis, Dean Hunkele,Wilmington WQ Files, Wilm. GW Files, Central Files 127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone 910-395-3900 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer FAX 910-350-2004 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT Transaction Code: N Permit No. AW1310856 Date: October 27, 1999 Inspection Type: C Inspector: S Facility Type: 2 BI: N Facility Evaluating Rating: 5 QA: N Name and Location of Facility Inspected: Kalmar I, L.L.C. Camellia Farm NCSR 1354 (close to NCSR 1304 intersection- Duplin County) Entry Time: 13:30 Exit Time/Date: 15:30/10-22-99 Permit Effective Date: 8-24-98 Permit Expiration Date: 7-31-2003 Names, Titles of On -Site Representatives: Claire Kalmar ( Co-owner) Mike Jernigan (Farm Overseer) Bob Ivey (General Manager -Goldsboro Milling Co.) Dave Anderson (Waste Technical Services, Inc.) Name, Title and Address of Responsible Official: Claire Kalmar, Co-owner 409 Cole Drive Hampstead, North Carolina 28443 Phone Number: 910-270-9616 Contacted: Yes v (S = S atisfactory, M=Marginal, U = Unsatisfactory, N=Not Evaluated) Permit: S Facility Site Review: U Laboratory: N Pretreatment: Self -Monitoring Program: N Sludge Disposal: U Compliance Status: Noncompliance Records/Reports: S Flow Measurement: N Effluent: U Compliance Schedules: N Operations & Maintenance: U Other: 1) The site inspection revealed several structural anomalies within the treatment plant. Most structural problems were created by external soil loads exerted on the buried FRP tanks. The equalization tank failure is the most severe problem which has the potential to affect groundwater quality. Corrective measures should be undertaken per the advice of a structural engineer (a permit condition does require an engineer's certification). Please provide corrective actions as soon as possible. 2) The innovative treatment system was upset during the inspection. Excessive solids were leaving the plant and nitrification did not appear to be occurring. A portion of the plant effluent flows to a storage pond constructed within native soils in an insitu manner. This condition is of major concern and may be causing detrimental effects to groundwater quality. It is anticipated that the farm will be required to provide groundwater monitoring based upon the wastewater effluent quality. Additional correspondence from the Division's Groundwater Section will be forthcoming in the event that future groundwater monitoring will be needed. 3) The Division has not classified the innovative treatment plant and the Permittee is not required to have a certified operator. However, it is in the best interest of the farm to provide an experienced wastewater treatment plant operator. A knowledgeable Grade IV operator overseeing the plant for a couple of hours a day may prove to be beneficial in resolving treatment plant problems and identifying such problems as either operational or design. For example, the 60,000 gallon EQ basin is not aerated and based upon current flows, the detention time within this basin is sufficient to allow the influent flow to be septic (check the pH for verification). If the influent wastewater was freshened with hydrogen peroxide or additional aeration in the EQ basin, the aeration basin would not have to work as hard. 4) Regional Office staff sampled the irrigation field drainage ditches and found high concentrations of fecal coliform bacteria which indicates field runoff. Permit Condition I.8 requires you to provide corrective actions. 5) The farm staff have not been performing nitrogen loading calculations for spray irrigation activities. Permit Condition 111.5 requires all such loadings (also including manure spreading activities) to be at agronomic rates. Please begin these recording activities immediately which includes the use of spray irrigation form IRR-2 and quarterly pond samples for liquid manure applications. 6) The operating liquid level of the plant and storage pond exceeded freeboard limitations defined within Permit Condition VI.3. Please reduce the storage pond freeboard to an acceptable level and retrofit a barrier on the plant to prevent wastewater from frothing over the aeration basin. A freeboard level marker should be provided within the storage pond. 7) The manure should be routinely land applied when the receiver site is in a condition that permits land application. Manure stockpiles should have proper containment and cover to prevent direct contact with soil or stormwater. Name of Inspector(s): Jim Bushardt, Stoney Mathis, Dean Hunkele Agency/Office/Telephone: E&NR/Wilmin ' on/395-3900 Date: November 1, 1999 127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone 910-395-3900 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer FAX 910-350-2004 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper 10/19/1999 12:12 919-715-5048 State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James S. Hunt, Jr., Governor Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR A F15WA D E N R Division of Water Quality Non -Discharge Branch/ Permits & Engineering Location: 512 N Salisbury Street Suite 1219 Raleigh, N.C. 27604 Mailing Address: 1617 Mall Service Center Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1617 FAX: (919) 715-6D48 PAGE 01 I FAX TO: Z r* W ✓er I FAX NUMBER: W I " ' I FROM: SL _TosG, PHONE: & 4 3 �3 NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET: If you receive this fax by mistake call: Non -Discharge Branch @ 919 733-5083. Ext. 556 10/19/1999 12:12 919-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 02 s technicalSe . es 7'±.1 504 Compton Street Wilmington, NC 28401 910-763-5003 ANIMAL WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM GENERAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS Revision 2 May 26,1998 FOR CAMELLIA FARM No_2 A 14400 Head Finishing Facility located on NC State Road 1354 near Faison, North Carolina y J.Q. 11897.01 PROPRIETARY DECEIVED _ ....: r::x J"YSEC7f0N AN Q ti998 t7;?7i1!jr'9 l CARaI •,, �.r�..4ES51n: /y4 SEAL0 }> ...,. • Qpr•- 10/19/1999 12:12 1 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 03 Rev. 2 - 512"o !. D- 11897.01 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................•..._.._............................................_......_..._......-•--- 1 FLOWPATH ......... •.......................................................................... .......................................................................... ........................ 1 SYSTEM DESIGN .......................................... ........................ 2 General Specifications.................................................................... EqualizationTank Volume .-•-.--•---..--.--......................................................•...•---...---...................................__..._..._............_. 2 Aeration Treatment System Volume....................................................................--•--......................................................._... 2 Materialsof Construction .............................................. ....................................••---••-----.._.............................._.............................2 SystemComponents- ................. ................................................ ................................................................................................ ..... 3 EqualizationTank.. ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 SolidsSeparator....................................................................•----........---..................................._......__....__............................__...... 3 AerationChamber ............................... ........... ..... .............................. ........... 1-........ ................................................ ................... 4 ClarificationChamber ............................. .............................. ............................................................................................ ........... 4 EffluentPump Chamber..................................................---•........__............................._4 SludgeHolding Chamber ........... ............................................................................................................... ................................... 5 AirHandling System.................................................---._.._....---.............................................. 5 ClarifierSurface Skimmer/Scum Baffle .............................................••---...._............................._........------....__....._........................_ 7 Effluent Overflow Dam ........................................... Controls and Safe -Guards ................................................. _._.._ .. 7 INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS...................................................................................................................................................... e EQUIPMENTSPECIFICATIONS..........................................•--._...__..................._......_...-----.._......_.................._.....__....._...........__...__...-_... 9 EQUALIZATION TANK DISCHARGE PUMP..................................................•-•--•-•---......................................_....------------................ 9 EFFLUENT CHAMBER DISCHARGE PUMP.........................................................................................................................I.......... 9 SLUDGE CHAMBER DISCHARGE PUMP .----.----••..........................................................................................•---........_...__...... 10 AERATIONBLOWER................................................---..................----•-•---...__......................................................................... 10 SOLIDSSEPARATOR_ ............ ................................. ...................... .............................................................................................. 11 ii 10/19/1999 12:12 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE ER PAGE 04 Rev. 2 - 5/2"8 l.0. 11897.01 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS fo r Aerobic Animal Waste Treatment System INTRODUCTION The Animal Waste Treatment System incorporates the exposure of animal waste to oxygen (02), by aeration, in order to reduce BOD5 to acceptable dissolved oxygen standards while simultaneously reducing ammonia nitrogen (NH3). Ammonia nitrogen is the major cause of the noxious odor associated with animal waste streams and retention lagoons. The system is a natural treatment process with no utilization of hazardous materials or chemical additives. FLOW PATH The animal waste is flushed from the floor of the house and collected in an Equalization Tank. The volume of waste flushed from the house is determined by the size and number of animals contained within the house. The volume of liquid flushed at any one time is the accumulated waste products and the amount of flush water used to remove that waste. A submersible pump continuously pumps the collected waste from the Equalization Tank to the treatment system. The waste enters the system at the inlet of a Solids Separator where the solid waste products are removed. The removed solids are utilized by the Owner or hauled by a Certified Waste Hauler. The liquid waste discharged from the Solids Separator is routed to the fiberglass Anoxic/Aeration Chamber section of the system_ Air is pumped by rotary blowers to the Aeration Chamber through a header and a number of Diffusers located along the length of the tank. Because of the chamber design, location of Diffusers and the volume of air pumped into the chamber, the waste within the chamber is rolled over from the bottom to the top. The waste also flows down the chamber length towards the outlet end. At the outlet end of the Aeration Chamber the waste flows into the fiberglass Clarifier Chamber of the system. Here the remaining solids precipitate from the liquid. The solids settle into the bottom of the incline sided fiberglass hopper where they are continuously pumped to the Sludge Chamber by an Air Lift Pump. The liquid portion of the waste flows continuously out of the Clarifier Chamber, over a Weir, to the Effluent Chamber. From here it is pumped by a submersible pump back to the animal houses for use as flush water_ The excess liquid is routed to the Owner's Holding Basin (pond) for later use as field irrigation and/or wash down water. A Skimmer is located in the Clarifier Chamber and continuously skims floating solids_ and routes them to the Sludge Chamber. The Sludge Chamber is continuously pumped out by a submersible pump discharging to the beginning of the Aeration Chamber (ano)ic section) and the Equalization Tank. A& docw cm cowmw PROPRMATARr DESIGN INF0,RMA770N which is dre sole p operry of Waste Techniod Ssnica firm They erp►ersly reserve dreir Common Caw Co"righr and *&er rights concermV the War+s+adon contahwdlrernm This &wwmem h nor to be reproduced or copied is any form or mamrer, nor is it ro be auianed without wr&rm pernt&sion and consent of Waste Tsclwkd Services. Ina 1 10/19/1999 12:12 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 05 A". z - j/2&98 J.O. 11897.01 SYSTEM DESIGN A. General Specifications for 112&00_ GPD system Equalization Tank Volume: _ 60,000 gallons (effective) Overall Dimensions: 42' x 24' x 12' deep 2. Aeration Treatment System Volume Aeration Chamber Volume: 144,155 gallons (effective) Anoxic Chamber Volume: 9 874 gallons (effective) Clarifier Chamber Volume: _ 11,100 gallons (effective) Sludge Chamber Volume: _ 11,849 gallons (effective) Effluent Chamber Volume: 11.849 gallons (effective) Overall Dimensions: 68' x 36' x 12' dee 3. Materials of Construction a. All tanks will be fabricated of hand and spray lay-up Single Skin laminate Fiberglass.. The interior surface will be smooth Isopthaliic Gel -Coat (polyester with neo-pentyl glycol added for corrosion and blister resistance). The second layer will be 2 oz. chopped mat. The third layer will be 1'/z oz_ chopped mat. The forth layer will be 24 oz. Bi-directional woven cloth. The fifth (external surface) will be 1 Y2 oz. chopped mat. Vinyl estor resin will be used in the skin coat and Polyestor resin will be used in the remainder laminates. Structural strengthening members will be molded into the exterior of the tank where required. b. The clarifier hopper inserts will be fabricated of fiberglass utilizing the same materials and procedures as the tank construction. c. All other fiberglass parts such as tank partitions, skimmer troughs and scum baffles will be identically fabricated with the exception that all exposed surfaces will be isopthallic Gel -Coat. Yho AKummm ca emm P.ROMETARY DESIGN INFORMA770N whiny a the wk prepaty of Waar TwAmfaal SffVAM , IBM 77Fey mpnmly reservc their Common Ls- Copyright and other rights conedm iag the luformariow contebeed herein. 77dir da wrum it not ro be repro w ed or copied in anyform ar mmtser, nor is it to be auigned withowt written pmniniow and corneal of Waste Technical Services, btc F 10/19/1999 12:12 919-715-6048 DWa NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 06 Rev. 2 - 51261" J.O. 1,1997.Of c. All internal and external liquid piping, fittings and valves will be Schedule 40 PVC meeting ASTM D-1784, D-1785, D- 2672, and D-2466 specifications_ d. All air piping, fittings and valves from the Air Header toland including the union will be Schedule 80 CPVC meeting ASTM D--1784 and F-441 specifications. The remainder of the air piping will be Schedule 40 PVC. e. The Air Header will be custom fabricated from FRP, hand lay-up per NBS PS 15-69 or equal. f. The Blower Discharge piping and fitings will be Schedule 80 CPVC meeting ASTM D-1784 and F-441 specifications. g. Clarifier Chamber tank tops will be covered with shop painted steel grating or surrounded with 4' high chain link fence, as appropriate. B. System Components 1. Equalization Tank The Equalization Tank is of sufficient capacity to retain the waste volume flushed from houses. The tank is equipped with duplex submersible pumps each of sufficient capacity to pump the waste, on a continuous basis, to the treatment system. A waste re -circulation line is provided to re- circulate the waste to the far end of the tank. This re -circulation will keep the solids in suspension and reduce a solids buildup within the tank. The pumps are float switch activated, set to ensure proper system flow rates so as to maintain adequate reserve volume within the Equalization Tank. The pumps are sized and controlled to ensure 100% back-up capabilities should one pump fail. Each pump is provided with a check valve, shut-off valve and a pipe union for pump removal. The valves and union are located near the top of the tank for easy operation and maintenance. The pump control panel is provided with appropriate circuit breakers, switches and a pump failure alarm. 2. Solids Separator From the Equalization Tank the waste (primary influent) is pumped to the inlet of a 100 GPM rated rolleriscreen press located on an appropriate support structure_ A suitable building structure will be provided to store the solids and protect them from the elements. Approximately 30% of the This document comam PROPRIETARY DESIGN INFORMA1701V wkxh fu the sofa propory of Waste. Tec&wcal Sa vvite, Inc They crpretr* rererve their Common Lon Copyn& =d odur rths concaernft the Inforfneaon cofvaiWd how" . n= 4000ne u u no to be reproduced or capisd im ary form or manner. for is & so be ano ed wf *o w writtms pmmiz on and cam w of Wane Tacka cal Serrkm Ixc. 3 10/19/1999 12:12 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PACE 07 Rev. 1- 5,2&W J.D. lId97.0I waste solids are removed here. The liquid (secondary influent) gravity drains to the Aeration Chamber. The solids are stockpiled for later removal by the Owner. 3. Aeration Chamber The Aeration Chamber(s) consists of the Anoxic section and Aeration section. The Anoxic section is sized to provide sufficient retention for de - nitrification. The Aeration section is sized to provide a minimum twenty- four (24) hour retention of the daily hydraulic flow. To insure maximum retention and eliminate short circuiting of raw waste, the Aeration section is equipped with 22 air diffuser bars placed longitudinally along one side of the chamber so as to enhance the spiral rotation of the chamber contents, To ensure adequate circulation velocity, the proportion of the chamber width to depth is less than 1.33 to 1. The velocity of the rotation is sufficient to scour the chamber bottom and prevent sludge settling as well as preventing the escape, to the surface, of the air diffusion bubbles, thus, providing maximum oxygenation efficiency_ The Anoxic section is kept mixed by the placement of the sludge recycle line. 4. Clarification Chamber The waste flows from the far end of the Aeration Chamber(s) into the Clarification Chamber via a thru-wall opening discharging into a baffled section of the chamber. The Clarification Chamber has 2 12' x 12' x 9' - 4" inclined sided hopper inserts. The solids that were not removed by the Solids Separator and the bio-mass solids precipitate to the bottom of the hoppers and the liquid exits over a dam partition running the entire width of the end of the Clarification Chamber_ This Clarification Chamber contains a scum baffle and surface skimmer that is located in front of the dam partition. This section of the system also contains one air lift pump located in the center of each clarifier hopper insert_ The sludge that collects at the. bottom of each insert is continuously pumped to the Sludge Chamber. 5. Effluent Pump Chamber The liquid exiting the Clarification Chamber flows to the 11,849 gallon Effluent Chamber. This chamber is equipped with duplex submersible pumps each of sufficient capacity to pump the effluent, on a continuous basis, back to the houses for reuse as flushing water. The pump control Thir drumwew contains PROPRMErARY DESIGN INFORMATION wAkh is the sots property of Wear fechnkoi Serview, Inc They expressly reserve their Common Law Copyright sad oAar P4*& coxcerrtlteg the btforrwadon catooined haftim This Amonew v not to be rgwodnrd or copied it mry foss or maateeu, nor is it to be &Wgned **howl P&Wmv peswe&sioh dmd cowsew of Waste rechnical Saviees. Inc 4 1e/19/1999 12:12 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 08 Rev. 2 - S/.25,9a J.O. 11897.01 panel is provided with appropriate circuit breakers, switches and a pump failure alarm. The. pumps are float switch activated, set to ensure proper system flow rates so as to maintain adequate flush water volume_ The pumps are sized and controlled to ensure 100% back up capabilities should one pump fail_ Each pump is provided with a check valve, shut-off valve and a pipe union for pump removal. The valves and union are located near the top of the chamber for easy operation and maintenance. The pump control panel is provided with appropriate circuit breakers, switches and a pump failure alarm. 6. Sludge Holding Chamber The _ 11,849 gallon Sludge Holding Chamber receives sludge from the Clarifier Chamber. This chamber is equipped with duplex submersible pumps each of sufficient capacity to pump the collected sludge to the Anoxic section of the Aeration Chamber. The Sludge Pump discharge line can also be routed to either the Separator inlet or the Equalization Tank in order to provide for sludge continuous wasting. The pumps are float switch activated, set to ensure proper system flow rates so as to maintain adequate recycle volume. The pumps are sized and controlled to ensure 100% back up capabilities should one pump fail. Each pump is provided with a check valve, shut-off valve and a pipe union for pump removal. The valves and union are located near the top of the chamber for easy operation and maintenance. The pump control panel is provided with appropriate circuit breakers, switches and a pump failure alarm. 7. Air Handling System a. Blower/Motor Unit Belt driven rotary blowers are provided to supply the system air at the required volume and pressure_ The blower unit is sized to provide adequate air per calculated pound of BODr, and NOD treatment plant loading. To reduce noise, the unit is skid mounted and provided with an inlet filter/silencer and discharge silencer. Valving, over -pressure protection and a control panel for manuallofflautomatic operation is provided. Controls are also provided to insure that failure of the air supply system will shut down the waste feed pumps in the Equalization Tank_ This added precaution insures that sub -standard effluent will not be discharged into the Owner's Holding Pond. Thin documew contains PROPRIETARY DESIGN INFORMATION which is Ar Jolt property of Wean Technleal Services, Ina ney expressly reserve rhe& Common Law Copyright and u&- rights cattemsing the wnfonnmfton avwtained herein. Thu docr m"a is not to be rrprioalkeed or copied in any farm or manner, marts it to be assigned wirbout wriaex permission and consent of Waste Technical Services, Inc. 5 10/19/1999 12:12 919--715-6046 DWO NON DISCHARGE SR PAGE 09 Rev. 2 - 51;l yYd J.U. 11&97.R1 Each unit discharges into a single Air'Distribution Header through composite flex air hoses suitable for normal operating pressure and temperature_ b_ Air Distribution Header A custom fabricated Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic header is mounted on appropriate pipe supports along the length of the treatment plant, Outlet connections are provided at the correct dimensional positions to accommodate the necessary diffuser, lift pump and skimmer air supply lines. c. Diffusers The Aeration Chamber contains 22 Diffusers. Each Diffuser drop assembly is equipped with an air regulation/shut off ball valve, a disconnecting pipe union and a diffuser bar with 6 fine bubble air diffusers. The diffuser bar is parallel to and near the base of the chamber side wall and at an elevation which will provide for the effective diffusion and mixing of the chamber contents. The bar length is designed to provide an adequate supply of oxygen in the aeration chamber in order to meet treatment requirements of the design waste load. The air regulation/shut off valve is located near the Air Distribution Header for ease of operation and maintenance. d. Sludge Return Pump Air Supply Line The Sludge Return Pump is supplied with an adequate supply of air through 3/4" OD CPVC/PVC pipe equipped with an air regulation/shut off ball valve and a disconnecting pipe union. The air supply line enters the lift pump near the bottom. The air/regulation shut off valve is located near the Air Distribution Header for ease of operation and maintenance. e. Surface Skimmer Air Supply Line The Surface Skimmer is supplied with an adequate supply of air through 314" .OD CPVC/PVC pipe equipped with an air regulation/shut off valve and a disconnecting pipe union. The air supply line enters the skimmer near the bottom of the loop seal. The air/regulation shut off valve is located near the Air Distribution Header for ease of operation and maintenance. Thu documetnr contains PROPRIETARY DESIGN INFI7RAlA110N which is the sole properry of Wane Technical Services, Inc- 776ey Owes* ramw lair Common Law Copyrigdt and other rights concerning the information contained herein. 77Yis &wwnettt is no to ba reproduced or c+opkd in arty form or manner, nor is h to be assigned without wridea pe►ndssion and content of Wavr Technkai Services, Inc 6 10/19/1999 12:12 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 10 Rev. 1- 5126" J.O. 11897.01 8. Surface Skimmer/Scum Baffle Skimmer Troughs 1 Scum Baffles are located in front of the effluent overflow weir to facilitate the removal of surface scum and debris. The trough is connected to a 2" OD PVC loop seal. A clean -out plug and union are provided for maintenance. The surface debris is carried to the Sludge Chamber through 2" OD PVC piping. 9. Effluent Overflow Weir An Effluent Overflow Weir is installed at the end of the Claifier Chamber. This partition is set at the 11' system liquid level so that as liquid flows into the front (Aeration Chamber) of the system an equal volume of liquid flows over the weir into the Effluent Chamber. C. Controls and Safe -Guards f _ Controls are provided to prevent the inadvertent discharge of off -standard effluent to the houses and pond in the event of simultaneous Aeration Blower failure. 2. Overflows from the Effluent and Sludge Chambers are provided to direct the overflows of these chambers back to the Equalization Tank in the event of simultaneous pump failure_ 77-s doe-m— evamas PROPRIETARY DESIGN L%"RHATTON wAAA it tAe sale propery of Watte Teehnaml Sermcew Ixr- They esprexsly reserve their Common Low Capyrigkt and oilier 4hty conerrnimW the information cordabud Anvin. This decwwwd It not to be reprodweed or eapiad in wry form or manner, Kor is it to be assigned witkove wri►tew permission and consent of Waste Technical Serrictt, !en 7 10/19/1999 12:12 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 11 Rev. 2 - 5126198 J.O. 11897 01 INSTALLATION SPECMCATIONS SITE LOCATION: On NC SR1354 a roximatel .2 mi. before NC SR1304 intersection SE of Faison, North Carolina ELEVATION: 100 (ft. above sea level) -- AMBIENT TEMPERATURE(°F): average max_: BAROMETRIC PRESSURE(in. Hg): 29.92 NUMBER OF HOUSES: 20 TYPE/NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 14,400 Finishers 85 AVERAGE TOTAL WASTE PRODUCTION(gpd): 17,712 SYSTEM DESIGN SPECIFICS average min.: 38 BOD5 (mg/L) INFLUENT 3076 DESIGN EFFLUENT: 15 TKN (mg/L) INFLUENT 2222 DESIGN EFFLUENT 20 FLOW (MGD) INFLUENT 1.11E-01 DESIGN EFFLUENT 1.11E-01 DESIGN AIR FLOW (CFM) 800 DESIGN HYDRAULIC LOADING (MGD) 1.12E-01 DESIGN LIQUID RECYCLED (GPM) 65 DESIGN DISCHARGE TO BASIN (GPM) 13 DESIGN SOLIDS REMOVAL (GPD) 446 Thu dam m W car mm PROPRIETARY DESIGN INFORMATION whw-k a disc sale prapaV of Waste TecJ med Sc vloes, In= T ke7 erprcslr resew dmw Comwwm Law Gwriglu and other Praha cancerning Ike informadan conlahwd halo ,TTidi doewnaa a nor to br reprodw ed yr copied in wry fwm or warmer, Ror is it to be assigned writhoul wriucn permitsron and cmucnl of Waste Tad wira! Services, Inc 8 10/19/1999' 12:12 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 12 Rey. 2 - 5/2&P8 I.Q 11897.01 EQUIPMENT SPECUICATIONS EQUALIZATION TANK DISCHARGE PUMP Make: Zoeller 4290 "Agricultural" or equal Number. 2 Solids Handling: 1 '/2" Fluid: Animal Waste Inlet Temp: 70 OF TDH (ft.): 32 Flow (GPM): 90 Motor Type: AC Induction Motor HP: 1 Phase 0: 1 Voltage: 230 vAC NEMA Design: B Insulation: Class B EFFLUENT CHAMBER DISCHARGE PUMP Make: Grundfos Series EF 100 orequal Number: 2 Solids Handling: 2" Fluid: Animal Waste TDH (ft.): 25 Motor Type: AC Induction Phase 0: 1 NEMA Design: A Inlet Temp: TO OF Flow (GPM): SO Motor HP: 1 Voltage: 230 vAC . Insulation: Class F Type: Submersible Discharge Temp: 70 OF Discharge Size: 2 " NPT RPM: 3450 Operation: Continuous Type: Submersible Discharge Temp: 70 OF Discharge Size: 2 " NPT RPM: 3290 Operation: Intermittent n- — mruains ,PROPRIETARY DESIGN 1NFORMA77ON ovmc r is die sole prgveM of Www Terkwcal Sermdw, Inc. They cgwcsdly rescnv ,*cw C--x Law Copyrialo and odor nglay mwenung dw b0nrsadon wftw red ker a & n* dwAwwW It ow ro be reproduced or oopwd In oriy foe... or mmvres nor Is b robe and co umo of Wam 1'aaFudca! Sayiees, bra 9 10/19/1999 12:12 919-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 13 4 /ICY. ^ �SiFM JO • 1 o.11sgzal SLUDGE CHAMBER DISCHARGE PUMP Make: Grundfos Series EF 50 or equal Number: 2 Solids Handling: 2" Fluid: Animal Waste Inlet Temp: 70 OF TDH (ft.): 15 Flow (GPM): 65 Motor Type: AC Induction Motor HP: I/, Phase �: 1 Voltage: 230 vAC NEMA Design: A Insulation: Class F AERATION BLOWER Type: Submersible Discharge Temp: 70 OF Discharge Size: 2 " NPT RPM: 1655 Operation: Intermittent Make: Roots Rota!y or equal Number 2 Frame Size: 59 RPM: 2700 Flow Capacity (CFM): 800 Fluid: Air Inlet Pressure (psis): 14.7 Inlet Temperature: 100 OF Discharge Pressure (prig): 6 Discharge Temperature: 180 OF Disch. Size:2'/:" NPT Pressure Relief Valve Type: Weighted Motor Type: TEFC Motor HP: 30 RPM: 1725 Phase 3 Voltage: 230 AC Operation: Continuous NEMA Design: A Insulation: Class B ?7ia dacaowesu emvaLrs PROPRIETARY DESIGN LNFORMA770N wkfck it Jw sole propnry of Waste Tedmkaf Servkim !wc T1k7 mgwmrlj rrsove &eir Cowmmn Lo- Cop 7W& and adw ngk& cwraawfna fke bgbrmwwn cmadmd kereft n* docummw it wof to 1w reprodwed or egpu din a y fw w ar mmmrrn, riot is it to &r ass4wrd wk iaw wrmm permladow twd mmeW of Worn Taeporaf Smvk,-4 lire 10 10,19I1999 '12:12 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 14 Am 2 - in"a J 0 11897.01 SOLIDS SEPARATOR Make: Kev Dollar Model 100 or equal Number. 1 Rated Capacity (GPM): 100 Screen Perforations: Fluid: Animal Waste Inlet Temp: 70 OF Flow (GPM): 77 Inlet Size: 2 " NPT Roller Drive: - S.S. Chain # 50 Motor Type: TEFC Motor HP: "A Phase 0: 1 Voltage: 230 vAC NEMA Design_ Insulation: Clasi A Type: ScreentRoller Press 1132 Discharge Temp: 70 OF Disch. Size: 4 " NPT Speed Reduction: RPM: 1750 Operation: Continuous Thv dorm e w confaim PROPRIETARY DESIGN INFORMATION wku* a the sale prope V of Wasee rediniml Servinm Inc They ill reta we their Ce wiwon Law Copyright and odic* P4*w coacerwig the iuf brmawn caars6eed hv=m 7= doemmo < a sat M be repro 6wed or copied oe mry forM or ntairxer. nor Fs B to be assigned •rithow irrilrew pmw awx mod cowsad of Wam Terhmed S'erwa Inc ' �i 10/19/1999 12:45 919-715-6046 State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director DWO NON DISCHARGE BR D E N R Division of Water Quality Non;Discharge Branch/ Permits & Engineering Location: 512 N Salisbury Street Sulte 1219 Raleigh, N,C. 27604 Mailing Address: 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1617 FAX: (919) 715-6048 PAGE 01/09 I FAX TO: k,'e"IC 'd' L€ i VLe' I FAX NUMBER: W 1 f4-U - j FROM: aL SD_S � 4 PHONE: NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET: V ilk, CG. 1� f5; Su21- �0C'F Cry` ups If you receive this fax by mistake call: Non -Discharge Branch @ 919 733-5083, Ext. 556 10,/19I1999 12:45 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE PR PAGE 02/09 WTS J OQ 11097,01 I. State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management Non -Discharge Permit Application Form (THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORlo1NALRC E C E I V E D i 'T : _CWN' ANIMAL WASTE OPERATIONS GENERAL INFORMATION: Hon-Dieoharc? Permitfin" I. Farm's name: 4MC-1,L//4 4,eAl Ala . 2 2. Print Owners or Signing Official's name and title: (person legally responsible for the operation and its compliance):: jra a aj vn r• n . t22 g r. M t--�-C 3- Mailing addms: _Q CD 1 e _Dr_ _. Cim: t`6r-0,4 5t3cs��_ , state: .. JC zip. -2 7L/L � Telephone Number_ (_ 910 9(004, 4. Latitude: hl 3 S - D 6 ; Longitude: 1A Z� -- of Farm (if known) 5. Farm Location (be as specific as possible including road names, directions. n9lepast, etc.): S E o � Lak l.$on o l .S l dQ cX S R 13 5q -- • SW o�' S2 /35q e 13o4 trr�,ersee nor 6. Please state if this is a company. contract or independent grower: ^ !a/v r/14 07 7. Punt the name of the company or contract name (if applicable): rD LDsZQL?_0 � 8_ Print Nlana=er's name (if applicable): t F fir MtJ ie A 9- Prins Lessee's name (if applicable)- I`r _/_14 10, Application Date: [ I _- _jq- 6??_ i 1. Counry %. here animal facility is located: bu P L I N 1'_- County(ies) where the animal waste application fields are located: DU f LI tJ 11. P£Rti1IT INFORMATION: 1. AppIication No. (will be completed by DEM '_. Specify whether project is: X new; renewal`; K modification; new but existing" If this application is being subnained as a result of a renewal or modification to an e��xiifming, permit, list the existing permit number AVOS ,3 i oB and its issue date _ " If this is a new permit for an existing facility. some of the questions/provisions may be inappropriate_ Please. complete as best as possible- 3- Has this facility previously been approved by reeulation 15A ? CAC 2H .0217 as a "deemed permitted non discharge facility"" Yes; x No �- Please Dist the name of the technical specialist who cenified the plan: FORM: A«'O 12195 Page I of 36 1W19/1.999 12: 45 919-715-6046 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 03/09 "a s 11"7.01 IV. INFOR'+`IATION ON WASTE: 'Whai t.pe of animal operation is proposed►Wsting (i.e. swine farrow to finish, dairy canle, etc): `S W i !� l✓ C I S N C. 2. Maximum animal population projected (number and type of confined animals per cycle, cycles per yew, total per year). e 3. volume of liquid waste gencrated by this project which trust be disposed: 1 gallons per day S % 5 gallons per month �D�1%gallons per year 4. bs there any other waste stream included with the animal waste? Yes, JX No, If ves. describe. What type of waste, bow much, etc. (note: domestic waste shall not be added to artimal waste streams): /V lq 11 any dry wtote land applied on sites listed in this application?_�(— Yes; No /ALL If YeS. please complete the following questions: A B Please list the source of the dry waste: 'hat is the volume of dry waste applied? e-S* ��4 9/ ups w./ 6'� 79W7 -:A ,mod C. lden0ty the nutrient characteristics o the he dry waste_ Please include a chin c analysis of the waste. D_ Are the available nutrients in the dry waste included in the nutrient management program for this facility? Yes: No 6. Are any commercial fertilizers used on the sites listed in th- application? Yes; x Nv Ifes. es. what and at what rate: /9 V. DESIGN INFORMATION 1. Provide a brief listing of the components of the waste management system. including dimensions, capacities, and detention times of tanks. pumping facilities, high rater alarms. filters, ponds. lagoons, etc.: FORM- AWO 12/95 Page 4 of 16 10/19/1999 12:45 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 04/09 vn,s J.O. 11 "7.01 2. Lagoon Design; (Please complete if facility has an existing or proposed lagoon for operation. Attach a separate page of this qu"tion 2 for each additional lagoon): a. Specify the storage volume fequired by the water balance: sir . . gallons; !� _ . days (required in Pats III,f): b_ Total volume of lagoon provided: IV1,09 gallons; 1. Volume for sludge store: Iq gallons; PrO,iI� b f Q',,, oe-oh is 2. Volume for design treatment: _. /y gallons: 3. Volume for wastewater storage. gallons; How many dkys storage does this provide? 64M days; TOTE: A storage time of six months is recommended. 4_ Row many acre-feet is the surface area of the lagoon: acre-feet. c. What is the height of the dikelembankment at its highest point? feet, NOTE : If the dike/embankment is over 15 feet high and impounds ovef 10 acre feet of waste, a permit for dike construction must be obtained as required by the North Carolina Dam Safety Law through the Division of Laad Quality_ d What is the rainfall amount for the 25 year, 24 hour storm in the facility area: inches; Please provide data showin-a this. e. What is the design freeboard for the lagoon: fi feet: (freeboard is calculated as one foot plus the hei t of the 25 year, 24 hour scorn► amount) f. Is the lacoon lined? �* Yes 4 No. If Yes. Please describe the liner. material used. etc.. ly A Does the liner meet the Division's requirement of 1.0 x 10-5 cm/second permeability rate? � Yes 6L No. Please list the lagoon's liner permeability rate; crn/second g_ What measures are being taken to protect the integrity of the lagoon dikes (i.e. vegetation, fences to keep out animals, etc.): h_ Please include all design plans, specifications and calculations on lagoon design as required by Pan Ill,b. and Pan Ill.b, of this application. j1j/A 3.. Nam; of closest downslope surface waters from the treatment lagoon: 4. Classification of waters listed in 3 above: (as established by the Environmental Management Commission & specified in Pan VIII of this application - This classification must be provided by the appropriate Regional Office prior to the submittal of the application). 5. If a power failure at the facility could impact waters classified as WS. SA, B, or SB, describe which of the measures are bein_ implemented to prevent such impact, as required in 15A NCAC 2H .0219: FOR)1i: -AWO 12195 Page 5 of 16 10/19/1999 12:45 919--715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 05/09 Wr'S d_o. 11107.01 6. The animal waste management system must conform to the following buffers` [and all other applicable buffers as defined in 15A NCAC 2H .0219 6)(5)j. A waste management system includes the animal confinement areas, treatment lagoons. animal waste application fields, and any other area used in the production of tie animals: a) 400 feet bet-ceu a waste management system and any residence under separate ownership, public use area, church, picnic area, etc.: b) 100 feet between the waste management system and any private or public water supply source; c) 100 feet between the waste management system and any stream classified as WS or B, any waters Classified as SA or SB and any other stream, canal, marsh, coastal waters, lake or impoundment: d1 50 feet between the waste management system excluding application fields and property lines: e) 150 feet between any outer boundary of the anirnal waste application fields to any property boundary; The following buffers became effective on October 1, 1995 and apply to any new swine farm (defined as any swine farm whose operations were sited on or after October I, 1995 and includes modifications of existing fatalities and new houses on existing farms) as ratified in Chapter 420 of the General Assembly of forth Carolina 1995 Session. Any more restrictive buffer listed below slues precedent over buffers listed in 15A NCAC 2H .0219 0)(5): f) 1 500 feet between the waste management system and any occupied residence, g) 2.500 feet between the waste management system and any school, hospital or church, h) 100 feet bet-een the waste management system and any property boundary, i) 50 feet from any outer boundary of the animal waste application fields for the waste management system to gay perennial stream of river, other than an irrigation ditch or canal. 7. If any of the buffers specified in No. 6 above are 11S2t proposed to be met, please explain flow the proposed buffers will pracide equal or hctter protection of the waters of the State with no increased potential for nuisance conditions: A B. Are any components of the waste management system and animal waste application fields located in toe 100-year flood Plain? Yes: J� NO. If Yes. briefly describe the protective measures being taken to punted against flooding. R 9. Are any animal waste application fields located in wetland areas? Yes; -jX No. If Yes. describe the actions taken to protect these wetlands and provide a copy of the 401 certification approving the use of the wetland or it copy of the letter from DEM stating a 401 certification was not reguinW. FORM: ANVO 12195 Page 6 of 16 10/19f 1999 12: 45 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 06f 09 wT5 J.q, i Is97.01 VI. ANIMAL WASTE APPLICATION FIELD INFORMATION 1. How many acres are provided for animal waste application? acres Al 2. Please provide a soil analysis for each animal waste application field as requited by Part 111 j. J111A 3. Spccify the hydraulic loading rate reeonumndation, as determined by the soil scientist (required in Pan III,&.): inches per hour; �"_- inches per week; — -tom— inches per year a. Specifi- the hydraulic loading rate that will occur on the animal waste application fields- , inches per how; /� 9 inches per week: ✓ inches per year S. Is the design hydraulic loading rate different from the soil scientist recommendation listed in number 3 above? /tO Yes: �No; If yes, please explain:- 6. Specify- the acres available for the land application of atlimai waste: !,l Q- acres 7. V►'hai is the amount of plan[ available nitrogen from the animal waste [legaired in Past 1II,i.) . ,206 llislG �b 8. What is the amount of total phosphorus available from the animal waste (required in Pan 111.i.) 9. Based on the above information, what's the limiting factor for the listed sites (hydraulic or nutrients)? fi! 10. Application infonnation; a. What crops will be grown on these fields? Please provide a separate list of fields and crops for each. �E r/-yy / j b. When will the application occur? (time of year. season) 15 ge TAIsC0e 1 c. Please cornpletc the table below: animal W ige t:tillratim The following information can be provided by the MRCS or N.C. State Agriculture Extension Service Data Tables. L Amoilnt f XV ste produced per_year; ,$C� ter- i,STC/�7 1 .5�/t� �GL�S _ e' G(�a� JV A animals x 1-Y waste per animal per year = total waste produced per year 2_ Amount of Plant Available Niaogen produced per year (if existing facility, use value from VI.7 to calculate); �114 - animals x N /R- llbs ]nitrogen per animal per year = lbs per year available Nitrogen ?. Field and Crop information Field Number C= .5�� i •9n Au��i"�lvccP Pound; \ ,2 Acre Application Arealacres) EaundsN_msd buffers) Total Acres �: Total Pounds Available Nitrogen (listed in 2 above) Surplus or Deficit 4. Do the crops and the acreage listed in the table use enough nitrogen to remove the nutrients applied by the animal %- a.•te each ••earYes: NO FORM; ANVO I2/95 Page 7 of 16 10/19/1999 12:45 919-715-5048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 07/09 WTS J.U. 11997.01 11. Please describe how the animal waste will be land applied (type of system, trevelin= gun, permanent lines. etc.). Be specific. 12. Pre e pko%ide plans Arspe ifications, piping diagraats, etc. for the system listed above. A11,4 13. The treatment and animal waste application facilities must be posted and secured in some fashion to prevent unauthorized entry. Brieflv describe tltc measures being taken: 1a. %'hat is the maximum application rate of the application system listed above? (please include units) 15. Are any of the animal waste application fields in this application under -drained by drain tiles or other means'. Yes . Na. 1f Yes. please describe where the drains are located, what surface asters they drain to, how deep are they located from the surface of the land, and include any other pertinent information needed. /11 A V11. THE FOLLOWING FIELDS ARE TO BE USED FOR ANIMAL WASTE APPLICATION UNDER THIS PERMIT APPLICATION (PLEASE ATTACH MAP(S),SEE PART III,m.]: Application Area [acres] Maximum slope Meld \❑. Count-,, _Qw,ttmussee _ fexritrdia buffers) (I gercent) More: if more than ten l lal fields are to be Covered by this application, please attach a form listing all of the fields along with the information listed in Part lll.m FORM. AWO 12/95 Page 8 of 16 1`0I1911999 12.45 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 08109 WrSJ.Q 11107_01 VI11. Surface WEIter Classification. This form must be completed by the appropriate DEM regional office and included as a part of the project submittal information. INSTRUCTION'S TO NC PROFESSIONALS: The classification of the downslope surface waters (the surface waters that any overflow from the Facility would flow toward) in which this animal waste management system will be constructed must be determined by the appropriate DEM regional office. Therefore, you are required, prior to submittal of the application package, to submit this form with items I through 7 completed, to the appropriate Division of Environmental Management Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see page 8 of 8). At a minimum, you must include an 8.5" by I I" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located. Identify the closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has cornpieted the classilicatlon, reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and submit the application package. 1. Farm Name: _ E2 /1z, '[ �. 2-- /�� 2. ]lame � complete address of engineering firm: �C�TS e / EC J G^[i-,1 /�;j',��," 74 Telephone number: t J`t� ) 20 -3 3. Name of closest downslope surface waters: - AJU 4. County(ies) where the animal waste management system and surface waters tart located: _ t? lr ✓1 S. h1ap name and date: 6. tic professional's Seal (If appropriate). Signature. and Date: TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been constructed or field located. as identified on the attached map segment(s). 1 M---7 — C- Name of surface waters: c] Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission): Proposed classification, if applicable: Signature of rt!!ioma office personnel: Date, (All attachments must be signed) FORIM' ANVO 12195 Page 9 of 16 •10/19/1999 12:45 919-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 09/09 WTS J-0. 11$97.01 IX. SIGNATURES (Complete either page 10 or page 11) New Facillty - any new or existing farm which will include with this permit approval-convxuction of any additional system, treatment, etc. which was not previously existing on the farm. e-� - 1•ame and Complete Address of Engineering Firm: .STE /�cl�/C�4 rv/' 1�C. City: I.�/ /�{ j �1 _ State: zip. Telephone Number: 3 - Professional Engineer's Certification: attest that this application for�� has been reviewed by me and is Accurate and complete to the best of toy knowledge. 1 further attest that to the best of my knowledge the proposed design has been prepared in accordance with the applicable regulations. Although certain pottiarts of this subtrAttal package may -hive been developed by other professionals, inclusion Of these materials under my Signature and seal sispifies that 1 have reviewed this material and have judged it to be consistent with the proposed design and the constrnctWWAMq . 'north Carolina Professional En6neer's Seal. Signature, and Date: e• --.y �IH CARp •' o1ESS►py9:f _ ' SEAS_ �'J 02742 Applicant's Certification:) 'M 1, MC L attest that this application for has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowlede-e- I understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included. this application package will be retamed to me as incomplete. _. Signature pl «k x Z. nmocr. _ — - Dste 1 %�9-2 THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE,1NCLUD1?\G ALL SUPPORTING INTORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHOLI-D BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY SECTION PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT POST OFFICE BOX 29535 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (919) 733-5083 FAX NUMBER: (919) 733.0719 FORh1: AIVO 12195 Page 10 of 16 re 01, i Gmtw.- AlcGill Environmental Systems Copies to: USDA-MMI)iiplin 1100 Herring Rd. IE 1-0 Rose Hill, NC 28458 '. V71; ?. waste A'nalysis Rphort Earn Delway .5 Puplin County LO 6/ 4/97 LO aty,ple 1D.- rasle Code: M tescripilarl: nine Lamon Sludee N p 'K ca Alg 5 re AM A cu B HO rd c roffil 24017 11 IN - IV -NI14 W03 OR-N t1rca 12311 3855 20797 2872 1650 95.5 23 Ln 3665 156 298 .6 N if n m 11 Af 11 jif Af H 000 0 Na Ni Of Pb Al Se Li if ss C-M DIM% cca Alglorls) 1086 41.85 a . 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715-6048 State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality .tames B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 01/34 I tr')4;1 mm oft D E N R Division of Water Quality Non -Discharge Branch/ Permits & Engineering Location: 512 N Salisbury Street Suite 1219 Raleigh, N.C. 27604 Mailing Address: 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1617 FAX: (919) 715-6048 I FAX TO: <?Alr X Lr ; ve e— I FAX NUMBER: W I fe-U - I FROM: J - 37O-s G I PHONE: E 4 3 b 3 [NO. OF PAGES INCI:UDING THIS SHEET; If you receive this fax by mistake call:. Non -Discharge Branch 0 919 733-5083. Ext. 556 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 02/34 Technical Ser��ceir 504 Compton Street Wilmington, North Carolina SWINE FARM ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR CAMELLIA FARM No.2 147400 HEAD FINISHING FARM KALMAR I, LLC Claire R. Kalmar, General Manager November 20,1997 .�',•OR� .A Ro j� •,,, f0� issld y9'• i SEAT. � s s3.= 03742 =yr GG'''r~CNEE I certify that this Plan has been prepared by me and/or under rm- di =1 supervision and meets the applicable regulations of NRCS_ DEM and all other State and Local Rtcgulatiotts to the best of MY 1nawlodga and belief �/ �x y.I 1 Hugh M. Har&"V. P.E. Registre don No, 037d2 O'Ar. 2-1, 1 q I I Derr 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR CAMELLIA FARM No. 2 WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN Integrator: Goldsboro Hog Farms, Inc. Producer: Kalmar i, LLC Claire R. Kalmar, 409 Cole Drive, Hampstead, NC 28443 Farm Name- Cam&llia Farm No_ 2 Telephone: 910-2 70-9606 Type of Operation: Finishing Number of Animals: 14,400 Animal Waste Management Plan A. Data/Information: PAGE 03/34 wrs.r_a 11W701 i uz"r 1) Approximately 930 gpd of solids are generated. 2) Approximately 465 gpd of solids are removed by the solid separator before treatment. This number is conservative. 3) Approximately 1576 gpd sludge/solids, having an assumed 25% solids content, is wasted to the equalization tank for recycle through the separator for. approximately 50% sludge removal. 4) Sludge/solids per day = 465 f (25% x 1576 x 50% = 662 gpd; or, 1,008 tons/yr (wet basis). 5) Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) from the untreated solids is 47#/Ton, and from the treated sludgelsolids is 2#/Ton . 6) The Producer/Owner plans to land -apply the sludge/solids as fertilizer on field crops_ 7) The Producer/O%kmer owns and maintains 450 acres of crop land for receipt of the sludge/solids ( the Producer/Owner has no leased acreage for land application of animal waste). 8) If the accumulation of sludge/solids become excessive there are two composting companies, McGill Environmental and Carolina Compost Products located in Delway and Harrels NC respectively, that have agreed to haul the solid waste to there plants. B. The waste from this animal facility consists of the solids and sludge which are separated from the waste influent by a mechanical separator. The solids and sludge are allowed to 2 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715--6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 04/34 C. C wrs J Q 11897.01 11R0/97 .. accumulate in the separator house raving concrete walls and floor, and/or in a manure spreader(s). l:inally, the sludgeJsolids are land -applied to crop land as fertilizer. In order to make the Animal Waste Management Plan more readily understood, the following synopsis of the treatment methodology. is offered: The Animal Waste Treatment System incorporates the exposure of animal waste to oxygen (02) by extended aeration, in order to reduce BOD5 while simultaneously reducing ammonia nitrogen (NH3). Ammonia nitrogen is the major cause of the noxious odor associated with the animal waste stream and retention lagoons. The system is a natural, aerobic, treatment process with no utilization of hazardous materials or chemical additives. A narrative of the flow plan is as follows-. 1) See attached Animal Waste Management System flow diagram. 2) Flush water, waste water and solids (Q) flow by gravity from the animal houses to the equalization tank on a precise schedule. 3) A submersible pump(s) transfers Q to the mechanical solids separator. 4) Solids remain in a retaining area. 5) Liquids and suspended solids flow into the treatment tanks for BODS reduction, ammonia nitrogen conversion (NH3 removal), and clarification. 6) Return activated sludge (RAS) is recycled for nitrate conversion. 7) Waste sludge removed from system (ras) is remmed to the solids separator, thence to the solids retaining area. 8) Flush water (EI) is pumped to the animal houses. This water is free of ammonia nitrogen (NH3) 9) Water not required for flushing (E,) is sent to a small holding pond, 0.21 acres surface x 8 feet in depth. This pond size is the minimum size required to provide for 30 days of storage of excess water. This pond could be used as a source of wash -down, fire protection, and water for general area irrigation_ It would provide moisture only, in that approximately 99% of the ammonia nitrogen (NH;) has been removed. 10) The volume of rain water entering the pond has not been taken in to account because of the small surface area (0.21 acres) and evaporation. Also, the water in the pond is practically free of NH3; therefore, overflow from the pond should not be considered to be detrimental. 11) The solids retaining area should be covered by a structurally supported roof in order to prevent absorption of rain water by the sludge/solids. 12) This waste treatment system is in operation constantly, interrupted only in the event of power failure. A back-up generator should be on site to provide short term energy. There are system shut down features which prevents discharge of 'out -of -spec' effluent 1n the event of a blower or pump breakdown. All equipment except the separator is duplicated. The owner should keep spares in inventory for quick change -out. 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715--6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE $R PAGE 05/34 VrrS J.o. 11"7.01 11f2"7 E. The solids retaining. area is the source from which sludge and solids are taken to be land - applied by manure spreader(s) at agronomic rates suitable for the field crop in place. The field crop can be soy beans, corn, tobacco, small grain, cotton, etc., subject to the crop rotation plan of the owner. F_ Prior to beginning land application of the solids, the owner should have a representative sample of the sludge/solids mixture analyzed for nitrogen, phosphate, and potash (NPP) content_ These percentages should remain constant; however, annual sampling/testing would be prudent. Also, the owner should have the soil analyzed for all the fields on which he/she plans to apply solids_ Following these determinations, the owner can develop rates of application for the various fields based upon crop rotation sequence, nutrients present in the soil, and nutrients present in, the solids. Further, from the foregoing, the owner can determine the quantity of commercial fertilizer, if any, to be added per acre for the specific field crop. The manure spreader should be calibrated with respect to travel speed (mph), capacity of spreader box (tons) and pounds of solids required per acre for the specific field crop. G. Check List of Important.Items: I) ' Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, direct discharge during operation, or land application_ Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject to assessment of civil penalties by the Division of Environmental Management for every day that the discharge continues_ 2) The field office should have documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has Iong term access to adequate land to properly dispose of waste. If the producedowner does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide MRCS with a copy of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Animal Waste Management Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or availability of land. 3) Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation Systern(ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater than ten (10) tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM. (see FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 - Interim Riparian Forest Buffers). The foregoing sentences are directly applicable for application of waste by irrigation- This producer/owner will land -apply sludge/solids recovered from the separator. See Article D.3), 4), S), 6), and 7). Land application of the sludge/solids should not be done during rainfall_ when the soil is saturated or when the surface is frozen. In order to mitigate possible runoff, the sludge/solids should be disked into bare soil, applied to a growing field crop, or held in the retaining area for composting until conditions are suitable for land application by a manure spreader. 4) Odors from this facility should be minimal to none_ The treatment process is aerobic which converts ammonia nitrogen (NH3) to free nitrogen which is 4 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715-6046 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 06/34 - ... WrS 1 O 11097.01 1WOM released to the atmosphere. The sludge/solids front the retaining area are odorless for all practical purposes. It should be land -applied in accordance with the last sentence above, G_ 3). Regular wash downs of the animal _houses helps to control odors in both pit recharge and flush tank waste systems. 5) Sludge/solids should not be applied -to fields subject to flooding during a season of heavy rainfall. Please see "Weather and. Climate in North Carolina" in the NRCS Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance. Again, see the last sentence in Article G. 3). 6) Sludge/solids should be applied on actively growing field crops in such a rate that only 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered 7) Land application of sludge/solids in the fall and winter should be limited to cover crops and small grain 8) Land application of sludge/solids should be subject to the following limits: i) 25 feet from surface water. 10 100 feet from wells. iii) 200 feet from dwellings not owned by the producer/owner. iv) not reach other property and public rights -of -way. 9) Sludge/solids may be land -applied to prior converted "wet lands", provided that the fields have been approved as a land application site by a Technical Specialist- Sludge/solids may be applied to grassed waterways only at agronomic rates and provided the subject application causes no run off or drift_ 10) Domestic and industrial waste from wash -down facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., should not be discharged into the Animal Waste Treatment System. 11) Insect control can best be accomplished by placing the sludge/solids on the field crops without delay. Also, maintaining cover over the sludge/solids while waiting for land application or composting is important. Regular washdown of the animal houses is beneficial. 12) Dead animals, upon being discovered, should be buried to a depth of not less than 4 feef on high ground above the water table, burned in a pit, or delivered to a rendering plant. 13) An emergency action plan for the animal facility should cover the following items, as a minimum: i) Contact Waste Technical Services, Incorporated, 910-763-5003. ii) Contact Tri-County Electrical Membership Corporation if there is power failure due to storm, natural disaster, or accident at 800-548-4869_ iii) Contact your integrator, Goldsboro Hog Fanns, at 919-778-3130, ext. 1430. iv) Contact the Division of Environmental Management (DEM) at the appropriate regional office at 910-395-3900, after hours emergency . 5 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 07/34 W'rS J.O I 307J1I IU2"7 number_ 800-85M368 or 919-733-3942. Advise of problem and that the parties above have been called v) Contact 911 or the County Sheriff s Department if there is danger to the life or property of others at 910 296 2150, vi) Contact the supplier of the stand-by electrical generator if it fails to start following loss of commercial power. vii) Contact the contractor of the owner's choice to begin mobilization, to begin to repair damage/correct problft. viii) Post these names and numbers in a conspicuous location at the animal site, preferably by a telephone in the site office. 14) Upon completion of construction of buildings, pipelines, and grading of the site to the planned contours, a protective cover of vegetation should be established. This vegetation should be kept mowed. It would be desirable to erect perimeter fences having controlled access through a gate(s)_ The maximum hydraulic loading for this soil, per irrigation, is 1.7 inches_ The daily inflow of effluent into the retention pond requires 0.39 acres for general area irrigation absorption_ 15) If animal production at this facility is to be terminated or suspended, the Owner/Producer is responsible for obtaining, filing with DWQ, and implementing a "Closure Plan" which will eliminate the possibility of pollution and erosion. 16) Animal waste handling structures, piping, pumps, blowers, motors, stand-by generator, etc_, should be inspected on a regular basis_ A maintenance check -list should be kept on site. Dates of maintenance activities should be posted along with the name/initials of the person who performed the activity in a maintenance log book which is kept on the site for ready reference. H. Waste Utilization Plan: The ACREAGE AVAILABE FOR ANDM WASTE DISTRIBUTION, (Table 1) included, delineates the acreage available (450 acres) for waste application, and the Nitrogen Capacity (78,702 lbs./year). based on crops currently being grown, soil type and surface application. The amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) in the solids produced at this facility will be approximately 34,300 lbs./year- PAN SUNQV ARY - Available Acreage PAN Capacity-..... ....... 78,702 lbs. Camellia Farm No. 1 requirements...... _._ __. - 20` 4_,_00 lbs, 58,302 lbs Camellia Farm No_ 2 requirements.....- _ _ _ ... - 34,3001bs. 24,002 lbs. The Producer/Owner is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996, the Coastal Zone Management Act requires farms in some eastem counties of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This Dian addresses only Nitrogen. wirsiA tIa".01 m LO ANIMAL WASTE 'PAN' CALCULATIONS LD FOR LIQUIDS AND SOLIDS FROM AN AREOSIC TREATMENT SYSTEM W 1. LIQUID EFFLUENT DISCHARGED TO RETENTION POND: 18133 GPD @ 100 mg/L N concentration t° n 2. S LID WASTE DISPOSALV LUME: '- a. Pre-treatment solids characteristics - 465 GPD @ 29883rngIL N (average concentration) 41, CO b. Secondary treatment sludge characteristics.- 197 GPD @ 993 mg1L N (average concentration) • Elemental Cons: in p rn 8340 tbs, 1000 3. LIQUID PAN CALCULATION X Waste coeKcienl X gallons 1000000 0,0001D0 X 0.8 X 8340 - 0.67 lbs. N 11000 gallons TOTAL 12.10 Ibs. N 1 day ; 4, SOLIDS PAN CALCULATIONS: d H LO 0 a. Pre-treatment solids •n 0.029883 X 0.8 X 8340 = 199.38 lbs. N / 1000 allows i 92,71 Ibs. N 1 day ay b, Sludge 0.000993 X 0.8 X 8340 - 6.63 Ibs. N / 1000 gallons 1.31 Ibs. N 1 da TOTAL 94.02 Ibs. N 1 day ID fl M m ao AWNC , wra JA 11097.01 m kD ANIMAL WASTE PHOSPHORUS CALCULATIONS LD FOR SOLIDS FROM AN AREOBIC TREATMENT SYSTEM W LD LO Elemental Conc. in opm 83.40 lbs. 1000 X Waste ooefficient X Nutrient Multiplier X 1000000 gallons i cis Nutrient multiplier for P = 2.29 A a� 1. Pre-treated solid waste characlefislics 465 GPD @ 12311ppm P 0,012311 X 2, Sludge characteristics 0.000597 x 0.7 X 2.29 ' x 8340 - 164.59 Ibs.P=O111000 gallons 76.53 tbs.P,O:day 197 GPD @ 597 ppm P 0.7 X 2.29 X TOTAL Data Sources: I. Waste Trealmenl System Design Calculations, Waste Technical Services, Inc. J.O. 11097.02 2. Waste anafyaia al Ilquid and solds from a similar syelem at NCDA Cherry Farm AWNC 2 8340 = 7.988 fba.P=02l1000 ga[fana 1.67 fbs.P=OAay 76.10 fba.P202day DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 10/34 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715-6048 , . wrSl.a. i�e97.0Y uno� TABLE 1 : ACREAGE AVAILABLE FOR ANIMAL WASTE DISTRIBUTION NOTE: All animal waste Is in solid form and commercial fertilizer will not be used. TRACT FIELD 9 SOIL TYPE & CLASS - DETERMINING PHASE CROP CODE YIELD Lbs AW WACRE COMM NACRE ACRES Lbs N CAPACrTY APPLIC. T=ME 1894 1 Norfolk 2-6% C 100 125 12.51 1563,80 MAR-JUN 1894 -1 Norfolk 2-6% SG 1 60 12,51 751.00 OCT-MAR 1894 2 Norfolk 2-6% C 100 125 4,56 570.00 MAR-JUN 1894 -2 Norfolk 2-6% SG 1 60 4.56 273-60 OCT-MAR 1895 1 Autryville 1-4% C 75 94 5.96 558.80 MAR-JUN 1895 -1 Autryville 1-4% SG 1 1 60 5.96 357-60 OCT-MAR 1895 2 Autryville 1-4% C 75 94 53-07 4988.60 MAR JUN 1895 --2 Autryville 1-4% SG 1 60 53.07 3184.20 OCT-MAR 1895 3 Autryville 1-4% W 45 90 55.71 5013.90 FES-MAR 1895 -3 Autryville 14% SBDC 18 72 55.71 4011.10 JUN-SEP 1895 4 Autryville 1-4% C 1 75 94 0.51 47.80 MAR-JUN 1895 -4 Autryville 14% SG 1 60 0.51 30,50 OCT-MAR 1895 5 Autryville 1-4% C 75 94 2.16 203.00 MAR-JUN 1895 -5 Autryville 1-4% 5G 1 60 2.16 129.60 OCT-MAR 1895 5 Autryville 14% C 75 94 0.80 75.20 MAR-JUN -6 Autryville 1-4% SG 1 60 0.80 48.00 OCT-MAR 7 Autryville 1-4% C 75 94 1-26 118.40 MAR-JUN r895 -7 Autryville 1-4% SG 1 60 1.26 75.60 OCT-MAR 8 Autryville 14% C 75 94 2.20 206.60 MAR-JUN 1895 -8 Autryville 1-4% SG 1 60 2.20 132.00 OCT,-MAR 1895 9 Autryville 14% W 45 90 8.70 783.00 FEB-MAR 1895 -9 Autryville 1-4% SBDC 18 72 8.70 626.40 JUN-SEP 1895 10 Norfolk 2-6% W 55 110 62.10 6831,00 FEB-MAR 1895 -10 Norfolk2-6% SBDC 28 112 62,10 6955.20 JUN-SEP 1896 1 Norfolk 0-2% C 110 . 138 3.36 462.00 MAR-JUN 1896 -1 Norfolk 0-2% SG 1 60 3.36 201.60 OCT-MAR 1896 2 Norfolk 0-2% W 60 120 13.38 1605.60 ' FEB-MAR 1896 1896 ' -2 3 Norfolk 0-2% Autryville 1-4°/a SBDC W 33 45 132 90 13.38 6.56 1766.20 599.40 JUN-SEP FEB-MAR 1895 -3 Autryville 1-4% SBDC 1 18 72 6.56 479.50 1 JUN-SEP 1896 4 Norfolk 0-2% SS 40 160 1.54 246.40 1 APR-SEP 113% 1896 -4 5 Norfolk 0-2% Norfolk 0-2% SG OATS 1 60 60 78 1.54 6.34 92-40 494.50 OCT-MAR FEB-MAR 1696 --5 Norfolk 0-2% SBDC 33 132 1 6.34 836.90 JUN-SEP 1896 6 Norfolk 0-2% S8 40 160 1.50 240.00 1 APR-SEP TU IALb �ai.a� agaa7.� The tract and field numbers are taken from USDA-FSA maps obtained from the Duplin County office of that agency, copies attached - Indicates that this field is being over seeded, i-e, winter annuals follow summer annuals 7 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 11/34 WTS J.O. 31897.01 112"7 TABLE 1 : CONT. Tntals from nrP% inaea rsana I iAl 47 AACra 7 TRACT FIELD * SOIL TYPE A CLASS , DETERMINING PHASE CROP CODE YIELD Lbs AW NIACRE COMM NIACRE ACRES Lbs N CAPACITY APPLIC. TIME 1896 1 -6 Norfolk 0-2% SG 1 60 1.50 90.00 OCT-MAR 1896 7 Norfolk 0-2% W 60 120 1.80 216.00 FEB-MAR 1896 --7 Norfolk 0-2% SBDC 33 132 1.80 237.60 JUN-SEP 1896 8 Norfolk 0-2% W 60 120 2.50 300.00 FEB-MAR 1896 --8 Norfolk 0-2% SBDC 33 132 2.50 330.00 JUN-SEP 1896 9 Norfolk 0-2% W 60 120 4.36 523.20 FEB-MAR 1896 -9 Norfolk 0-2% SBDC 33 132 1 4.36 575.50 JUN-SEP 1896 10 Norfolk 0-2°% W 60 120 323 387.60 FEB4V AR 1896 -10 Norfolk 0-2% SBDC 33 132 3.23 426.40 JUN-SEP -1896 11 Autryville 1-4°% W 45 90 9.72 874.80 FEB-MAR 1696 -11 Autryville 14°% SBDC 18 72 9.72 699.80 JUNSEP 1896 12 Autryville 1-4 % W 45 90 15.61 1404.90 FEB-MAR 1896 -12 Autryville 14% SBDC 18 72 15.61 1123.90 JUN-SEP 1896 13 Norfolk 0-2% W 60 120 25.32 3038.40 FES-MAR 1896 -13 Norfolk 0-2°% SBDC 33 132 25.32 3342,20 JUN-SEP 1896 14 Norfolk 0-2% CO 700 1 70 39.10 2737,00 MAY-JUN 1896 -14 Norfolk 0-2% SG 1 60 39.10 2346.00 OCT-MAR 1896 16 Norfolk 0-2°% W 60 120 5.06 607.20 FEB-MAR 1896 -16 Norfolk 0-2% SBDC 33 132 5.06 667.90 JUN-SEP 1896 18 Norfolk 0-2% W 50 120 8.92 1070.40 FEB-MAR 1898 ~18 Norfolk 0-2°% SBDC 33 132 8.92 1177.40 JUN-SEP 1897 1 Autryville 1-4% CO 700 70 4316 302120 MAY-JUN 1897 -1 Autryville 1-4°% SG 1 60 43.16 2589.60 OCT-MAR 1898 1 Autryville 14 % CO 700 70 48.89 3422.30 MAY-JUN 1898 -1 Autryville 1-4% SG 60 60 48.89 2933.40 OCT-MAR I 1 TLITAL5 1 44V,99 ! /ts WZ-4V The tract and field numbers are taken from USDA-FSA reaps obtained from the Duplin County office of that agency, copies attached. - Indicates that this field is being over seeded, Le, winter annuals follow summer annuals 8 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PACE 12/34 . K � 5 S:o, t 1bs7At CAL113WON OF MANURE SPREADERS Effective utilization of matunre is not possible if you do not know how much is being spread over a given area. Calibration of your spreader is a simple and effective way of improving utiliZZ61M of nutrients in manure more effectively. Only by lmowing the application rate of your spreader ran you correctly apply manure to correspond to your crop needs and prevent water quality problems throe& the over application of animal manure. Applicators can apply manure, at varying rates and patterns, depending on forward travel and/or PTO speed, gear box settings, gate openings, operating pressures. spread xvidthls and overlaps. Calibration defines the combination of settings and travel speed needed to apply manure, bedding or wastewater at a desired rate and to ensure uniform application. Spreader- Capacity Liquid spreader capacities are normally rated by the manufacturer in gallons. Multiply by 0.004? to get tons. I Solid and semi -solid spreaders are rared by the manufacturer either is bushels or cubic feet (multiply bushels by 1."_'z to get cubic feet). Most spreaders have two rating capacities: (1) struck or level full, and ('•') heaped. Calibration of solid manure spreaders based on its capacity (volume) is dif rcult to estimate accurately because the density of solid and semi -solid manures are quite variable. Density is the weight of the manure per volume of manure ( pounds per cubic foot)_ vlanure density varies depending on the type and amount of bedding used as well as its storave method. Therefore, if you estimate spreader applicatibn rates as the volume of the manure the spreader holds you are overlooking the fact that some mature weighs more than other manure. This can cause a significant error when calculating manure application rates_ Since manures and litters have different densities. an on -farm test should be done. To deterruine the lead (tons) of a manure spreader: ' 1. Weigh an empty 5-gallon bucket. =. Fill the bucket level full with the material to be spread: Do not pack the material in the bucket but ensure that it settles similar to a loaded spreader. 3, Weigh the bucket aeain. Subtract the empty bucket weight from this weight to calculate the weight of the contents. 4. Multiply weight of contents by 1.5 to miculite pounds per cubic feet, density. DPL%IP�%1a=h 17. 1997—Pose 18 10/19/1999 12:3e 919-715-6e48 DWG! NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 13/34 WTsJ.O. jirn.0I S. Multiply the. mantas density by the cubic feet capacity of the spreader and divide by 2000 to get the tons of material in a spreader load. Spmder load (tons) a `eight of S jnl manure x 1.5 x caaneity (ft ' ) 2OW Solid and Semi -Solid Mnnnre Spreaders In order to calibrate a spreader for solid manure (20 percent or more solids), the following materials are needed: 1. Bucket ?_ Plastic sheet, Carp or old bedsheet. An even sim, 8 fee{ by g feet, 10 feet by 10 fees, or 12 feet by 12 feet. will make calculations easier. 3. Scales Calibration method.• 1. Locate a large and reasonably smooth, flat area where manure can be applied- 2. Spread the plastic sheet, tarp or bed sheet smoothly and evenly on the ground. 3. Fill the spreader with manure to the normal operating level. Drive the spreader at the normal application speed toward, the sheet spread on the ground, allowing the mcnure to begin leaving the spreader at an even, normal rate. 4. Drive ovet the sheet'at the normal application speed and Settings while continuing to apply manure. If a rear discharge spreader is used, three passes should be made: first, drive directly over the center of the sheet, the other two on opposite sides of the center at the normal spreader spacing overlap. 5. Weigh the empty bucket and plastic sheet, Tarp, or blanket 6. Collect all manure spread on the sheet and place it into the bucket. 7. Weigh bucket and manure and subtract the weight of the empty bucket and ground Sheet. This will give you the pounds of mtmtirre applied- to the sheet. 8. R,t pest the procedure three times to get a reliable average_ 9. Determine the average weight of the three manure applitatians. 13PUMP--Much 17. 1947—f'sec 19 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 14/34 WTS J.U. l JM.01 10. CaIculate the application rate using the follotiving fb=tila or Table 5-8: Application rsta {tons/acmj - lb mww a mammad x 21.78 sheer length (8) x sheer width (ft) 11. Repeat the procedure at different speeds and/or spreader settings until the desired application rate is achieved. Ex2mple: What is the application rate (tons per acre) if you collect 8.5 pounds of manure on a 10-foot by io-foot tarp during a calibration run? Application tau (tonsfa=) a 8.3 lb manure x 21.78 a. I.93 tons IDR x lOft Table 5-& Calibmtiots of Solid Manure Spreaders Pounas of Manure Tons of Manure Applied/Am Applied to Sheet Size of Ground Sheer 8, x 8, I0' x IV 12' x 12' 1 0.34 0 2' 0.15 '- 0.68 0." OJO 3 1.02 0.65 0-45 4 1.36 0.87 0.61 5 1.70 1.09 o.76 6 2.04 131 0.91 7 2-38 1-- 2 1.06 8 2.72 1.74 1.21 9 3.06 1.96 1.36 10 3_40 2.18 1.51 15 5.10 ;.27 2-27 20 6-31 -1.36 3.03 Many times it may be necessary to adjust the rate in which waste is applied from the way it is nornwlly spread. Changes in application rate can easily be done by increasing or decreasing the speed in which the waQtc is being applied. in order to perform these calculations, the spreader load (tons}, duration of application (minutes), and the average width (feet) of a normal application needs to be known_ the application rate and travel speed can be found using the following equations; spreader land (mns) x 495 Application rate (mnsfacre) time (min) = width (ft) x trsvel speed (mph) Travel speed (mph) _ :pmwkr lend (tons) x 495 time (min) x width (rk) x applicatioarm (tons/scrc) OPLIMP--M r h 17. 1997-Page 20 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715-6043 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 15/34 WTS J.O. 11897.O1 Example: What speed should you run if you wish to apply.4 tons of manure per acre with a 33-tan spreader? Your spreader application width is 20 feet and your spreader empties in h minutes. Trsvd speed (mph) Spreader Pattern Uniformity 3 torts x 495 6 min x M$ x 4 tansiacm o 3.1 mph To determine the uniformity of spread and the amount of overlap needed, place a line of small pans or trays equally spaced (2 to 4 feet) across the spreader path. The peals should be a minimum of 12 inches by 12 inches (or 15 inches in diameter), but no more than 24 inches by 24 inches; and 2 inches to 4 inches deep. Make one spreading pass directly over the center pan. Weigh the contents caught in each pan or pour the contents into equaUy sized --lass cylinders or clear plastic tubes and compare the amount in each. The effective spread width can be found by locating the point on either side of the path center where manure contents caught in the containers is half of what it is in the center. The distance between these points is the effective spreader width. The outer friase9 of the coverage area heyond these points should be overlapped on the next path to ensure a uniform rate over the entire field- "Fiat top," "p}►rauud," or "oval" patterns are most desirable and --give the most uniform application. :K. " "W," "steeple," or "lopside" panarns are not satisfactory and one or more of the spreader adjustments should be made. DPLttP- NImch M 1997—Page 21 Farm DRY-2 ' Farm owner Spreader Operator Dry titter Applicalion Field Record For Retarding Dry Litter Applicalion Evenls on Different Fields Traci # Field Ib Date (mmfddlyr) Crop Type Field Size Application (ac(es) Method' N al Loads Volume of LoadsSpreader Capacity' . Per Field (ci bie feel) (tans) LI . I ' U j I Q CS a . C7 C7 H m .�,. • t,y s� �m p ' S'1 -soil hicorparalui(diAcd); tilt alroadcasi (surfuccupplicil) Cn ' Can Sc fount! �� upl rutOf�S 11w♦YU:II jL1f trio Si1T1tEl1Cr. CurriilL� u Icx ❑I daaler if ya,t du uul Iinvc ywu otivuer's nruumf. ;M4 W ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FLOW DIAGRAM M M EQUALIZATION TANK ._�: rA1 S�Sr;'(,yjia-�r1i-'ir t� + -'� AN rj{]Jt it 0 .,ryiF;t, v'V CONFINE6 LIVE97IOCKAREA j ;T SOLIDS RETAINING AREA rag Q = Flush + Animal Waste q=75%Q E, = Flush Required E, q - E, S = 25% Q (as Solids) RAS = Reftint Activated Sludge ras = Activated Sludge Removed From Syslein f-LARIMCMrION SrAvms E I q E, Wasit Technical agaicn, Inc. 504 Complon Street Wilmington, NC 28401 910-763-5003 1 W 6 'c7 , m SA ' I lf7 ti I ck IT ro ri m CT) On 1 On co . I tiR � I Roll - �``•'` 'S_� 'sue � �+. I�tF` A I ' �� ` � �tpt yf�f'' �• (V19 I i iIr '•� fM t {Ias I", y,r.Of 1 �1� � D j �"• RAT ',wm-� a �,y PIP 41iow}d 1 tT� s Jan / t4vA p o t `•'�t�s, pw AAAA Y ►�' �sw C ►�+•"CR! Itf J kill N V lA _ I�ge ?F G06 —rxY lip 1. pAtaa�A 1.,q�, lobOD 4 tt {f.r9 i m,ao, Z, _ 1^ yI17 a ( � .:.}�•`•:r%i;;"::i i:R 4s.K' fy�r: ': •"L :' ". +�� 3�{�pr 141 M �'r ° al it .r"''l4 {` ,t. .;,df<.`•.r ` (�(' � �- (•, i'�,Tr Y;+��.`�7i.� d• �i' }bt., ' * a �.. i, ;'. +�� , r !' * �+�� y� ,� �i.•it:- . .(�' ,'Arf � 1l r• �%, �1j,4y i"�, i.:ti 1 '.'l rr :•S y.jlif�"��'I,+T `.t'-�G:..,' •.'!1 i' 1 i��'y :r• t.r.^f r .:' �,. r',t f j+� 1.J �5 ?..r`.r ,� - •..'1 �'{ .... �1'':4'�+ y ti;'�b:i'r'±�5 „�i� j: -: •.�:,�•", F:�;i• �,�:i•y,! zr�s'�''��+,r��yy� � •,•Y j��4ilN,re'''rh+�SJ'f ✓�'�L:'S.!`.'•i�:' �St�i,aj• gel {e , � �i,yJr f,'!� y . .� •� r.: �il=.}•JFe :3-� r"T' ,;3; r , ! r�' d•.',}: 9 � l� v �J� i�,' ., _ •, ' �';i" �' • • :r'�'r' ^� is*�'.. •./.y. {if, ;� :�Fr'�• / �^•.,'.,7�,,! w:l.l :,��:, ., r' . .; .•R�rcy �i, ate � ;� � ••� 1 •. �. '''' .�; ,', ` ��ai�F."' i'I: 4J'�' *.+�'�'f r.ryl �.�, �"'�7:1±<y, `;yy 1 �. fri ��,e' 7',A '�? ti, q, iI}. •k `-.' � .' �: '?:,�,/' �5,.++t:, 1 / J "';�%J ,r.�. ;rt ti•`W„"�+:,, r' �•R'�,,f.� •i li' .e{; a f-:..• .rf" :��•i: < r1f �:�: i,i:Y ... � : �..'T'�'t+4:, r��i ��•! F� . •• , y/ � ' °r!•/••�,r jx jV��'ir1 1•.. r. �• �' V , ,.:/'`7�,•' N ' '=r�..:.�►{ r+ Y! h , %;, ,' ' i•!w. �±�, f, j:, ,?;�•;.:Q_ r .,-. •.6 ,•�, �,i+ t.iY�%`^'':.- .f;1; f •, f•! x• . Y' r � j: rI•i't {}. � !}''M1 �{'�.1.> 'r,�',: •��{� t �t�'� `.Y`:! ,�i,:', 4-�.�''s. �'"' w •. iy '+. -r �„�•it �tl�, ��':�'� ca °.1 •S.i .y'•Nl.,,t r�: '.,: ilia :'�!.i,,4 y r•:yf •;e('+•• ;i ,. ;fir, a�',+r4,f� Jw : � •�iIF�+'fin+/`:-1,'}'.`~ti{-.s J•F.'s-�1�, +- �„•v ..T ='. . �' +i:' Y p !!'y?• ''Rl•r..rL"' {t"�.. 'r� !f F. ► :,�. -'tee' r' ..,4I-. T' •° '{. i i:� ..A4: ,! ,.,. i.o :. �.r",•. ,.v. k4 - �`a�i.�r �� p�.'•',it�,..: to/Y::y��;. i1.� � :t ;S� ,�,. i�a'3.l^,:Lr. i#'•L:ri7 —4: .� ,•� Qw >:►W"M %�t:;j�Sr �•wr�/•I�j=1:''}ti .:f •. r'r�;�1��1r isy,' �'��i r�l'f.-. �,4;"s,`r �' • ��"�' '�, r : s�� ,. L� K r '-L•:,�f,�. S .l XS:' 1• •,7�1.F�,y]}�� nf`tr��; fxy7�'��%•�''�`Y�y� Ft.-'�• �'„`+f r.'w L�' .: .r�.tt ,,�,'J r ii` f + u��'r.j. L �`.a, �!47L��-F'yt%fl Y �i „�'f��- - !y ai�F��s�J; .11(r��`1k�r'""��.� . +'!<i• �l' � � y�t' af'K �ji.•t�,,T1i' '!'tr L'" Y 4-_`'+,j'�.s��llf.�r'•{,�'7 ' � ��,1 �_�•.�,�"-JtttGG�rre"77(�iai:.s��4►�s:'"� +�it i'' r r 1 rlv�''i�.y �� •A. 'rj!'•{' `1�-a,'; �`�.J��,1•�'�R :Lit, ��•�,7i111` •. ^"','!^'��''.i��'�yxl�n !�.'TC1�: �'•�r�.i�"i �'�':+�J ,(E � 4' ,,�{�t ., �i-�v.��lt '��#�A�a • K}, �� . ,� cf�M `'c-:ts. 4�:x!•'i i�•I•�e�, - 1� n'�� a,l�,y ,_. t2F,7 �.'; 't.. :'Y}% ��-?i ,,r 'Jlti r:l( ��?t ,.�i1 ; � ' Jr .t .j•+ - �,.y '�14`rw+'�..R�v�-,��eI[ "fy r•,•7' �• ^7�;'.`• ', r yilr y%17f �: e7'n�j�•'=�.'r_. K;, ,lJ j•7 • }�ti,:.r`+�C �A y��''',y�X, ..�� s- J ` ' ly��'�Jy •' � r, 'a="�Li.il"'e ,�. � •d . ,'.�1. �j, �' it'i4s� �� t. �•.,► ��. � . o : VJdl •J: • .Y: i,•�l?, )I"'��-kN �' "qh• :.f :%�I.'�.t�•'�• I. ♦ 1 `'1 ''N�"J+�i�•. .�� nib rS'.�''. �-Rs( A �� •�r� .�.' ITor L• � r 1 �,�t57i=1•'.L�' � � �•. `,rr.pr�� .s.P� t'V AI-: •!; ��r�4Zt� ''� A Y, .!°�'�'�_` . ri ; It 7 , i •. hl}. j rf .r •'i{.; r'f; �r},�Y' I�',u�ai'�'-j i I�j?�•�W � ' �"' °�'..i�:r' _'!'�� Jf� r S, � �+�� .rr �- i_�`j yy� '°,�•'`�;I��a->.�4.��i.y�l�r°"iM("�f��'%',�J'%'''"; 'i��,.'*, ^f '��:+� �i ?' ~' '�f:� �' h� y�"';'n :j t � + ',' ,a�s3: '` :,,�5�• `ti � � i„� r I.- �j fir' �r � r 1.+ `:' � i:;.`,`r' �•� -r Ca J y 'i'- 1:r „� �'a. �+�.�,,, °' �i. V: 3_''6'" . ;d4 ,� . :°• • f 'F:.1 s k•!r , �•,}.;_ ^�"`' I," ..:� �ji,.- �': t_.%:R� 1��t:'�,.�•..:} n�.. � .'' ':^•s ilz,st�'?� ��+�' ft +.•�:°;s . _ .f rq - a�r�t,,� . � ' �. �:yCyii ar ' T ,%„'i'�i'r_'.•�, - '`: '1: "S! y,�r i �.' .�s:'"'y' t •y'S r. •• j+ .� .:r°� f� . R I `rRr � � �; � ,+.t }.; � � •.;�a'..,, f �, • . Y' ' : w -!'J `i - � �,i''1{= : �q' �Pi �` �• �F,t 't �. :., ...�:r• :jam "-��; L'ieli�rf.w � S- E s �• •, A:. �,;i F , a '�,• " y r ;' i Zir •_ f. ' S i 1 r.s N, �'J ✓ 1 r.. ti f..,. `ti 'EM i' ♦. '1`; � .+ i! - . ..� t/r.r�,.-y�iyr 'i i, y�'{`�,_ 1, yJ:•'r ;�'.rar� 'j r.[y J 'die � •! �� , !tom .. •� .;�;t,.r! i,� >?'�'%, y� }) �;,f �w `� ,,it(p• ,: s'y !y .. .. � r- � , ),.,Irti<.. J'• ,iMC:4',`,-i••!,. '., y, lr� � .\-3,r +i at t k. r ,lfr ��sS r� i+• ��Y � ti ��-.'.*�:�''ir' S. �'•�T'',�,'.f��. x ;��. lye. r r. �f-{'`•'� :��1 ( +? 1. ,�: ei..?.f V' r �!i r �y%a�.; L`'Nr'. f �• ' e::.,'c ^f ij ��.i � 11 �i rr�••':lii i.•J n,t- .,fir•?:ii!`. �:.�.: � 11 �iC,�-r1� � lry � �~J r �� l:•r.,' � .rA �' lf � � f� ! a � ' r i 'M'' �� r•� °��fi�T{,�p=',,k��,�Lt~''.' , u ; e. .i .:• rt'rt., ,:t' fi; `• � '`i�. � _ "?k2i's'r_� �y: �• t1 ,1•° •�ya.:r�f ..r'?' .t°��' -� •'� ,j� r'{� 1 :L',r I i � T. �y�, Sn'Tw`. 1., -� ftit �►+' r.l7�+r ��.. A ,y �: ew.y..'�r. ... � R•.: 4 �re',,,'+j ` `«t •t • - Y�,' , ��.;r-i'�.'�i� •r`� ,. -•'�, '_ �.i.'/�•s, �'1' Jr,L •�1. i� � N� !%Y 5{rT: ...{'F'^•.� A i' f"L"` rld . �i:1.'� i,�j,}�.j9l�.s` �gi/ �' y �Ih Y •�� J° i •� �l,' ti^I J f. r y .;.;+k'f .�. S� ( `T� 1 1%�yr;� V��y WJiYi6; J, ! ` jo + o0 A�a• .�y:`j �� /H ,�t�_Y, C` IV) �' �, t s"h1` rV. •p �•':'.' �.,'ih• ,°�` `�� r•. \i .T.i';;.' fJcAti'� �.t}. .�Cf '`IT.•� - �.w,...� f..�+Ya � ;i, h,f� • r� �� `.'• -i' � �'� /�� :;:,v�f.4.f� , j' ?t�4� 1F i �r 1 \1 i �r� i, .� T•`kf„`�r��,{•' ' \�r.a... i 1 ' ' � •`•r:.� "~✓ x - °J _. 1 Y } \ i� � sr. ; •'' -. ,r! "• '..,". , .:'r r' .t ^-�'ti,� ID � a � r�Q ti w fin' i}• • � ,�'i N Q rkr' •�� `•�' :�"`Y '• �7 F1:` bpi°...r.r M ,1j., 11:� r rf1 r'}� F �, .•w 7- f.. W �Y :•:' 1 s_'2,.� . jr cn .jS • l;,,G'•j�Ml%,f,iy'.y��.l ,+ 1'rhg y t f' �..Jpw�' !: . - - • ! � .�•*N , ,`�;I: •�` '1:.1 cif '+' .f(;�-'�s.��. ,i i'' R , .+r YA Uj ' • ��t �, =� ;� r' � ems' SI . I 1 �5 , r� ��,�'-ra �� i �i 1 • :;. � ar A ♦ . P:L '' ++ �� 7�5r i:' `, Ids{ 14-.tl } �� . }=• tiA41•'� 1 1. L1 "57 I :: 1 �`'� `` Y Y!L � �!� fl•� f�,i, �'Ci� l'r 7 , ,��1' 1 F.:v Af Y �' ..I ,-1 -i� � J y . � fit. �;� ,1 •'!' ,,f � ,% L •i �ti �r< , �r� y'►. •.t� ie;� �� . . al � V'' �• ,�i� tl. •a+ff•�`, }r{�.�. .•• �l[� � t'ry �Y��r� + �`� li � �'��' 1� -, .- . gt uD qL -+�q} �I . �.�� t. 7�'l' L !� `:��,•-- yJ.� >�1+ y `X ' ' _..r-:7�'r'.Y��IIi:1..Qa,^«I` ili'u - .... . =1rF O',, •'1,i •I •.., ...��.' •yi � fir.' '' � i.•a 1p, .• •1i'I ;A �+�+ .J, "'•s" "'�'I.��,i- I i ��I t }i ,= rjq��•n��•lz`� �I(CA i 0�-I��`ti' �F: ,.ji'~j � ,.::�'�i.�•�� - _` ";.� \sJj�Y��J. ��,..�1.'lb�,•�'r{{1.�,1r''., ,r'Y r'e� r •I {_ r r-+r '• 'l,J• /J '''Y,;.t Y ; I\'•�. r V'.'N �' 7r yi' 'yam. '�.s r 1 C � ;' ��.( `��.•f��[f}�•' {y(' � /' 1. - � ��/;, 1r ,-C m 'r;;:,''�+ 1�.i /��!!;: " r I � :.� ;yif rya. ,,l, l• v„1' ' �:;J...•,f,':i r•!'-•r: !!�; + �+ �tr!! ,. 1 ,ni '� , 7�j".;��;�.�.'•, . _ 1 . r�vrti'ieir� 1f'J'•.• - r•f �� _ y 51r } � J.��,9� fi.•:',i�•!i;.�. _..n:•.- 7S�'..: htisSf�,... . .. - 4Z Vltk -mv A, rA L 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 25/34 - _ _ . r •W15 J_0. 11897.0 1 11121R7 TraTEST, INC. 3909 Beryl Road Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone: (919) 834-4984 11��JS�,/ Fax: (919) 834-6437 �l . NC/WW Cert . #) : 067 L a b c ra to >ry- Report - - - Prepared for - PHILIP WESTERMAN NCSU BIOLOGICAL AGRI. EKG_ AIOLOGICAL AGRICULTURAL ENG_ Pj I-LEIGM, NC 27695-7625 Project TD : 04Z� RJZ I f r-A PJK Project Info: WASTEWATER Page 1 of 1 Report, Date: 7125/97 Date Received: 7/10/97 work Order 4: 9707-16045 CUfft- Code: N06742 Cuet_ P-0.9, Condition a. Sample I❑ Date Sampled Time Sampled matrix 2 AERATION IN GRAB 7/10 7/19/I997 13:OS ww 4t210C • >Dste Tent Performed met"& Regulxu Tech Analyzed Qua alochemicah Oxygen pems"d ZPA 40S.1 3300 mg/L ME 7/10/97 O. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Condition 2 CLARIFIER our GR" 7/10 7/16/1997 13,05 ww 4 f2'C Test Parform#--d Rsselta Tech Analyzed Qua 8icehemical Oxygen Demand LrpA 405.1 39 mg/L M 7/19/91 Report certified by: for Triteat, Inc. cd,,yfi� Qs4-1t5 4 Avp 4199716.0,47 hWelpOputf Page'j Mill1f ilm11t►111111 1111►%tIIIIIItmIIts ►111HM1f111Its Io111111lM%%III o 14.13 AwAq. >�. 11/1 s0 ....... .. Il1TY�Cpl1. ........................._..... w+ AuA . Y N OA f 0 N T u r r >t p 0 1r Arlly o I r N 0 0 1 u r I C A 0 M A V I ) S r 1 c 1 lfsl V ► 1 N.OS- IC! ►l#-I11 1 ]i /1 'Ilf 1f1.OD s.00 1T1.0 11l.0 ltr.A 1 I80) IF A s el►rm AJA]-i 1 11 ll 1/1 0.45 0.15 00.0 MA 104 ! J191 0 A I TWrW Am-m" 1 If #7 is) 9.11 I,eo Iw.0 111.0 111.0 / 118111 A A M90 A%4A,_ R_ .O11_ I2_._ll-S1 1-_U 41.6 51.7 I1.7 1 loll v A I I. Lhckom 1 if t1 no 110,00 lJO 111.0 10.1 1l1.0 / Jlfi v A I Jut zw_4vT / to I1 I !l.If f.0o 1IO4,0 /1i.0 117.0 Ji11 M A I VR71M JoVMI 1 11 i) 711 10.00 1.r7 110.1 IIl,0 111.0 t+ CA A ! O C [ 11LV111 c 0 w0J, S T r. ) >A iNc t I 0 M # 1 = 1 0 6 A t e I AN Y A A A 9 U 11 1 11is l.fl O.Ifll ii,lf M0.0 , 0•e00 1 1.1 /+!o 7,11 0.9)1f 11.42 . 0051.v . .. .. .. . . 1 et)0 13) O.MD, 41.1e 05]]_0 . . . . . . . . . 1 111 ti,$1 9.0114 ]].ti 81.) . . . . . . • . i•Otl 0 p./ ) bill 1.0 6.101 11.01 f41.0 . . . . • . . . , o•oof , 1 11100 7.71 ]-mC I1,11 . 11014.0 . . . . . . . . . O.Opf i Il,i m �a LO LO LO N W CS) LD I cn I Cri t� m t� E 0 z 2 d m to ro m -4 4.., N 0 e7 w A J 1 .{ Y 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE $R PAGE 27/34 f ir21l97 JW 04Srl e a� r Accg :7— -f h:z--our SL��o yr 8-/3 -9 7 34 , p_,m _,�- - - v 57144dy- f Atk9 SgA-roe #, . sz !o I, 0 1 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 28/34 ►ITS J.O.11897.81 1 La1197 Southern Testing & RCS' e_a_ � ch L_ aboratm e_s_, In.c. ti �J1119 AtrImirl 10 ce 19191 ?17-•117= � Y1'::�: r'l14t ,�y-�!•1.11 I'Vilson. NI-27XWP SAMPLW NO"_ G046Z-001 - E P O R T. of A N A L Y S I S Date Reported�'07/25/97 Don Lloyd Systems Co. 101 Beaverdam Trail Phone_(910)298-4224 X Newport NC 28510 Fax: (910)223-3516 lient Sample ID: ONG&P-1 rAP-Oi -arks- Influent -Grab ollected: 07/16/97 12:10 ecei-.ed: 07/16/97 13:10 .T No. ANALYSES '-003 ]ROD (5-day) 1-030 Nitrogen: Ammonia (as N) 1-030.7 Nitrogen: Total (as N) 1--030.2 Nitrogen: Kjeldahi (as N) 1-030.4 Nitrogen: Nitrate (a$ N.) i-030.6 Nitrogen: Nitrite (as N) 1-038_2 Phosphorus: Total (as P) 1-040.1 Solids_ Total Suspended 'OMMENTS: ND ='Not Detected .aborat ory Contact (s) : 'hris Mathis section Head, water Quality !ate Matrix: WASTEWATER CZa i.firation: Ftm MDL 30 S 1.33 1..;0 4•. 125 0.00S 10.0 10 RESULT UNITS .3.140 mgiL 243 mg/L ', •`1:' try-•� i . LID ring i L 0.012 fig/L 104 mg/L 2,110 mg/L P.eviewed wid Approved by: IS B_ Cox, . I1,111B . . Manager. Envi/ ornnental. Dept _ 'age 1 of 3 G0462R.233 (EH1:V2RO7.2) 07/25/97 14:56 �a•rmiral+�+.1 �14ra,1•.i..t��1 .�r.+l••��:1•'w.i...mm�Jn[ - lud...l�iat Il.r:.ror ,��r.w•hvm6ed I•...-1. 1'h;..�u;.ca��l�ru1� 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 29/34 • _ J.O- 11897.01 . .. 111Z1197 04— SouthernTestin' & Research Labor atones, Irtc. il`to 09 Airp arl Dfl%v 17141 ? 17-.117C • I'9t_ l�11*11 ZZ7 4-IJ1 VVilwspi. NU 27WAro 4!A SAMPLE' No .: G04 bZ: W S P O R T of A N A L Y S I S Date Repoxced= 07/25/97 Don Lloyd Systems Co, 101 Beaverdam Trail Phone: (910) 298-4224 X Newporc NC 28570 Fax: (93.0) 223-3516 r. a.: lient Sample ID: CkUPAy FAPO'c arks: Effluent -Grab illeered: 01/16/97 12:10 Matrix: WASTEWATER �ceived: 07/16/97 13.10 Clasoiti.c:ation: ENV C No - -003 -030 -030.7 -030.2 -030.4 -030.6 -038-2 -040 . 3 ANALYSES BOD (5-day) Nitrogen: A.mlfi02tia (as N) Nitrogen: Total (as N) Nitrogen: Kj eldahl (as 14) Nitrogen: Nitrate (as N) Nitrogen: Nitrite (as N) Phosphorus- To c a 1 (as P ) Solids: Total Suspended MDL RESULT UNITS 4 16 tng/L 0.36 8.44 mat/T. 0-43 -02-7 mg/L 0.30 20.2 mg/L 0.125 2.32 mg/L 0.0 25 0.219 Ong/L 5.00 65.4 mg/L 2 RR mg/L )MMENTS--- 3boratory Corttact(s) : Reviewed/ and Approved L�- I} f I f iris Mathis accion Head, Water Quality Manager. Ant iiOnmen r C-1 1. i y •r - age 2 of 3 G0462R.233 (EH1:v2R07.2) 07/25/9-7 14:56 CPawrk.waa6- Ir\-1.4,tr,LAJ liaMi—ft' �L`I'n:hnpic•;d - V"t-0- - I-IIYnnucrwln•nJ* 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR PACE 30/34 Wrs j.0. 11"7.01 1I121M o a La '04SIR t r So e* .?71 Testing & Research .Laboratories, hic. 38119 Airpurt IIris a OV)1 : 117. 1l75 • o'ifyl ?47.9.Uf Wilyul. NC 27xq(. SAMPLE NO. — G0462.-003 S P O R T of A N A L Y S I S Date Reported- 07/25/97 Don Lloyd Systems Co. 101 Beavrerdam Trail Phone: (910) 298-4224 X Newport NC 28570 Fax. (910)223-3516 P. U- 1 iene Sample ID: G' A C2R-Y Ff�2�Lt A arks: Sludge -Grab ollected: 07/16/97 12:10 I Matri.X: SLUDGE eceived- 07/16/97 13:10 li Cla:C;sification: ENV T No. ANALYSES MDL R9SULT UNITS -003 BOD (5-day) 175 2,860 nlg/kg -030.1 Nitrogen: Ammonia (as N) 6-ns 13.4 tng/kg -030.9 Nitrogen: Total (as N) 1.29 654 mg/kg -03.0-3 Nitrogen: Kjeldahl (as N) 0.03 854 mg/kg -030.S Nitrogen: Nitrate (as N) 1-2s ND mg/kg -030.9 Nitrogen: Nitrite (as N) 0.005 0.013 nag/kg -038.3 Phosphorus: Total (as P) 62-5 597 mglkg -040.1 Solids: Total Suspended 0 15.900 sang/kg OmmWTS : ND a "Not Detected aboratory Contact (0) : Ret�:i�y,ed and Approved by: hris Mathis Jai e:; f+ _ Coy, T B .: f ection Head, WaCer Quality Ma3iager, Environmental DrI pf . age 3 of 3 G0462R.233 (8N1=V2R07-2) U'l.!7_" '" 1.1 -S I,Z..,pa nl spid Keir.•-44,46VIra1 %nr11 w.: Vol. il irl li.Klr•w. - \C*••ClVqnw"-li • ::i & - 14_lroer%vadh. , 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE SR PAGE 31/34 W15 J.O. 11297.01 11/20/97 Name of Farm_ CAMELLIA FARM No. 2 OWNERIMANAGER AGREEMENT: I (we) understand and will follow and implement the provisions, criteria and checklist items as developed and approved in the Animal Waste Management Plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion of the existing.design capacity of the waste treatment system or construction of new facilities will require a new management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DEM before the additional animals are stockced- I (we) understand that I must own or have access to manure spreading equipment for land application of the animal waste described in this waste management plan. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land according to this plan at the appropriate times and rates. Name of Facility Owner_ Signature [ .,� � ,r i Date [ �p 7 Name of Manager (if different from Owner): hdike Jemigim Signature 't` Date(( Z� Name of Technical Specialist: Hugh ]Sk Hardaway, P.E. Affiliation:. Waste Technical Services, Inc - Address: 504 Compton Street, Wilmington, NC 28401. 9107763-5003. Signature Date I cv. 9 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 32/34 11TS 1.0.11897A1 Animal Waste Management Plan Certification Please tvnc or print all information that does not require a sistnature Ggperal-Information: Name of Farm: dEL?9EcG/,� �� /vd 9- Facility No: 3 Owner(s) Name: KL_761WA12 LLC ,f0bl) �C 1. Phone No: O ---270- ADL Mailing Address: - Farm Location: County Farm is located Latitude and Longitude: —,V J oG 1 G[> 78` OG Integrawr: �' 4 ?.� �2 rS,Ti Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road names, directions, milepost, etc.): _ - �?�� s� OtC Zi¢s /0.) pet CAST S��c of — ODe>;ation DescriDtion: Type of Swine No. of AnimaU Type of Poultry - No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals ❑ wean to Feeder ❑ Laver ❑ Dairy Feeder to Finish 17, ❑ Pullets 0 Beef ❑ Farrow to we= ❑ Farrow to Feeder _ ❑ Farrow to Finish Other Type ofLivestock66/ Wf Number ofAni nals.' ❑ Gilts © Boars Acreage Available for Application: Required Acreage- J � Number of tea! Storage Ponds: Total Capacity .2 .? S Cubic Feet (ft3) Are subsurface drains present ou the farm: YES orO (please circle one) If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FEELD (please code one) A1154 *****A***W A******;******W*******ems**a*MXt*vk****:*w*****# ***** ******** Owner / Manager Agreement I (we) verify that aU the above information is correct and will be updated upon cbanging. I (we) understand the aperat:iou and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste tnaaagement'plan for the farm named above and will implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage System or court meriou of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understated that there must be no discharge of animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year. 24hour storm and there must not be run-off from. the application of animal waste. I (we) mderstarid that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District- I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership requires written norifwzdon to DEM or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed) within 66 days of a title transfer. Name of Land Owner: .' Signature:_l Lr, r, cx Name of Manager(if di crent from owner): Signature- 0 ALVC -- August I. 1997 1 Date: I t; ,y ,��-7 x - Date: /I /"_ R q 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE $R PAGE 33/34 %k"rs J.O. 11897.01 Technical Specialist Certification L as a technical Specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005. 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm Named above has an animal waste management plan that meets or exceeds standards and spedricaUons of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM) as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA-Nawral Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission ptu5uaut to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001- MO. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC. 1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically Competent. IL Certification of Design A) Collection. Storage. Treatment System Check the appropriate box Existine facility without retrofit (SD or WIJP) Storage volume is adequate for' operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization requirements. X New, expanded or retrolittd fadb}i (SD) Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds. have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and speci6caaons.. . Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 14uC14-. W_[ _ Afflliatiotllf%l 5 e �r>>� rc/�r�s� ytC� Date Work Completed: _ 1 f — jam 97_ Address (Agent y):� fl ST. IrtiiL ,x,4l o 21 Phone No_:�lD 7d3-�GC�3 Si B) Land Application Site (WUP) The plan provides for minimum separations (bufEen); adequate amount of laud for waste utilization; chosen crop is suitable for waste managetne= hydrarilic and nutrient loading rates. Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): v��i4 � A�2D fc•� Affili&bon 1.{! STE T GL'Srv_cS,—L0 C— _ Date Work Completed: ) 1— -20 - 9�_7 Address (Age ): Dtk 011l :�-4Wi ,&40PhoneNo_:Q/D�2(o3- OG3 Signature: X¢- Date: rLl�1[. 2l MIf C) Runoff Cgntrols-from Exterior Lots Check: VIC appropriate box Facifity without ext(Lnor lots (SD or WUP or RC) This facility docs'not contain any exterior lots. D _Facility with exterior hits (RC) Methods to minimize the run oil of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in accordance with technical standards developed by MRCS. 1 Name of Technical Specialist (Please.Print):_�rti Pl4_ f!kc•i4�, . Al iliadon � '` Date Work Completed:_ I/- C1 -y--? Address (Ae y)--:24&�JralUi+/ Jr% i �/S� ��C Phone No.:�L-Z63� Sz�*tlature: AWC — AuLfust 1. 147 3 10/19/1999 12:30 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 34/34 W TS J.O. 11897.Ul D). licntion and Handling E ui meat Cheek the appropriate box xi. ti r et anding (ip or I) Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either Feld calibrated or evaluated in accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste management plan: (existing application equipment can Cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates. a schedule for timing of applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as pan of the plan). El Now.. apanded, m existing fan11rY vy_ithoatexisting_wwaste 422Hi ti m gguimn nt for spray irrigation, (1) Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for tinting of applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the plan). . New, -xp:mn Cl or exigtin facility acility wiW{ u existing w��te atrpli tiro eggiyment fit land spreadina not using v i n (WUP or 1) Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can cover_ the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading sates; a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjusimt nt guidance.are contained as part of the plan). Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): � _ _ ,��% �� Affiliation tG Date Work Completed: - �D Address (A ency): U+-� A SA U l C �r�/ Phone No.- -263-5�3 Signature: Date: E) Odor Control. Insect Control. 'Mortality Management and Emergency Action Plan (SD, SI. VWUP. RC or n The waste management plan for this facility incIudes a WAste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect Control Checklist. a MorWity Management Checklist and as Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and insects have been evaluated with respect to Chia site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility. Name of Technical Peg 9t (Please Print): % G� Affiliation -1_ dc� G/ — Date Work Completed: /L ad E Address (A-gncy): S� '. VO/ Phone No. Si 4 F) Written Notice of New or Expanding Swine Farm The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after .lucre 31, 19%6 1F the fncillt vs -as built before June 21, 1996, when WUS it constructed or last expanded I (we) certify that I wc) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property ow-ners and all property owners who own property locamd across a public road strerG or highway from this new or expmdiD- swine farm. The notice was in compliance wirb the rcqu;remencs of NCGS 106-905. A Copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is attached. Name of Land Owner. J('�'L%//�-E /2 �i9 L.4r��4%� % L ^oe _-Z7 ZZG Signature: fZ _�/• !"g =,�� , _ _ _ Date: 0 / Name of ?�Ianager_(if different from owner):, _ .TE//ice Signattire:-- AWC -- Aug%t 1. 1997 3 10/-19/1999 12:17 919-715-6948 State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director DWQ NON DISCHARGE ER PAGE 91/14 LT.r*wA IT 5 &4 2ai D� E N R Division of Water Quality Non -Discharge Branch/ Permits & Engineering Location: 512 N Salisbury Street Suite 1219 Raleigh, N.C. 27604 Mailing Address: 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1617 FAX: (919) 715-6048 I FAX TO: 12, rje. . "; vP--e I FAX NUMBER: ail I " - I FROM: JL So_qGc' PHONE: EX 3 -3 NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET: If you receive this fax by mistake call: Non -Discharge Branch @ 919 733-5083. Ext. 556 r � labn"cat se 4 "'ices 504 Compton Si. Wilmu►gton, Norlb Carolina 28401 (91 U) 763-5003 WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM DESIGN CALCULATIONS • Camellia Farm No.2 J.o. 11897.01 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION ufiasT T cr�ntic.a�- el �gc >;�s Es � .r I9 COPYiiIEiFIT,pjp NDOTiIs DK,s�aMOO ;P1QU11(7�}PILS:INll�J4M OR•MI[N`N R;�NQIt4. ARE THEY TO BE AS51�r1VE rHl 11T H�WR bQl$510J1(}iVp:GONSENT OF Via` z�Mi� ��GHN1S3 MOW, 11897.01 Waste Technical Services, Inc. Wilmington, North Carolina Index of Calculations A. FARM CAPACITY ..................................................... ............... ... 1 B. DAILY WASTE PRODUCTION....................................................... 2 C. SYSTEM PROCESS CAPACITY .................................................... 3 D. FLOW RATEIRETENTION TIME 1. Required Flow Rale................................................................ 4 2. Actual Retention Time.. ........................ ................................. 4 E. BOD5 LOADING 1. Primary Influent.—:.... , ...... — ........ .................... 4 2. Solids Removals .......................................... ........ 5 3. Secondary Influent.................................................................. 6 F. OXIDATION REQUIREMENTS 1. Oxygen required for carbonaceous matter ................................. 7 2. Oxygen required for Nitrogen conversion .................................... 7 G. AERATION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS 1. Aeration Chamber Volume Requirements .................................... 8 2. Aeration Chamber Air Requirements ........................................... a H. ANOXIC CHAMBER REQUIREMENTS 9 I. CLARIFICATION CAPACITY 1. Retention time....................................................................... 9 2. Surface Overflow Rate.............................................................. 10 J. SLUDGE HANDLING 1, Biological Sludge Production................................................... 10 2. Return Activated Sludge(RAS).................................................. 10 3. Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) ............................................. _— 10 4. Total Solids/Sludge Wasting... . .................... 10 5. Design MCRT...................... .............................................. _... 11 K FLOW BALANCE........................................................................ 11 List of References ................ I............................., , ............... _ . , . , ....... 11 Waste Technical Servic=::, Wilmington, North Carolina W SA Z_E TREATMENT SYSTEM SIZING J.O, #: 11897.01 T FARM NAME: Camellia Farm No.2 , r LOCATION: N011n/NC" COUNTYISTATE FARM TYPE: Firtislting HOUSE DESIGN: PIT RECHARGE NUMBER OF HOUSES: A. FARM CAPACITY. HOUSE 0 H-QG TYPE' NUMBER MOTES: 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 a N = Nursery, F = Finisher, S= Sow TOTAL 14400 Head WOMB 10:10 AM Page 1 DATE: �r23rss 1. This facility has 20 houses each containing 720 head. These calculations treat this as 10 houses with 1440 head each. 2. These houses will be flushed on 6 hour intervals. 3. Because of animal turnover (16-20 wks) at Least one house is always empty, thus reducing the total average daily input by 37189 gallons.This feature adds a 5% safety factor to the calculations. z: rr to x: 00 WVh*te apPIoptiria, values ale rounded to LN neatest v&ola number theiefar e= U calculated value will differ from those achieved using the whole numbers in the IT formulas, Checked Approved G wrs 1996 Waste Technical Services, Inc. Wilmington, north Carolina WASTE TREAT ENT SYSTEM S IZf N 11847.01 B. DAILY WASTE PRODUCTION: AD OU ("limbo 1 1440 X 2 1440 X 3 1440 X 4 1440 x 5 1440 X 6 1440 x 7 1440 X 8 1440 x 9 1440 X 10 1440 X 512B 86 i0 10 AM W6§TE TOTAL EWOR 4L FLjjraH FER102 WASTEI- lapdffiead) WAST (andl idAU FLUSH 19al, 1.23 = 1771.20 X x = 1239B.40 1.23 = 1771,20 x - 12398.40 1.23 - 1771.20 X gill= = 12398.40 1.23 1771,20 X = 12398.40 1.23 = 1771.20 X - 12398.40 1.23 = 1771.20 X 1 12398.40 1.23 = 1771.20 X = 12398.40 1.23 -- 1771.20 X = 12398.40 1. 23 - - 1171.20 X - 12 398.40 1.23 = 1771.20 x = 12398A0 TOTAL 1 TT 12 123984 Checked Approved Page 2 C WiS IM y 1e9�.a� C. SYSTEM PROCESS CAPACITY: Capacity required for hydraulic loading - House Lenalh101 }} Waste Technical Wilmington, North Carolina Defermined by House Flushin Requirament In.emal Pli Water lnlema4LD ��aU Volume Waste VdurrEs total �droultc L, alu �t Volume (-m jgaad (I' V4kime {gal] �o F. 1 8285.89 0.00 61978.46 12398.40 74376.66 `;' 2 8285.09 0.00 61978.46 12398-40 .74376.86 m 3 8285.89 0.00 61978,46 12398.40 74376.86 A co 4 6285.89 0.00 61978.46 12396.40 74376.86 5 - 8285.89 0.00 61978.46 12398.40 74376.86 6 8285.89 0.00 61976.46 12396.40 74376.06 7 8285.89 0.00 61978,46 12398.40 74376.86 8 8285.89 0,00 61978.46 12398.40 74376.86 9 8285.89 0.00 61978.46 12398.40 74376.86 10 8285.89 0.00 61978.46 12398.40 74376.86 ' The wkM of these louses Is the total Of two houses. Numbel of we1k& 0 Averages 6197B.46 12398.40 C3 Greatest volume flushed from any one housl9r,1s 74377 gallons (waste plus flush) Flushes 1 Day = 1.5 (number of houseslflush period) m Average Daily Flush Volume - 92968 gallons/process w Average Daily Waste Volume = 18598 gallons/process Greatest Hydraulic volume to be processed is 11-1665 gallons/process tK ar2BrsA f 0:10 AM Page 3 Checked D G) AQpi oved m m c wis IM Cn A Waste Technical Serve.;:;,, Wilmington, North Carolina 77897.D1 D. FLOW RATE and RETENTION TIME: 1. Required Flow Rate: 111565 Gallons is required to be processed every ®hours 111565 Gallons 1 24.00 / 60 min.lhr. 2. Actual Retention Time: 144155 gallons actual Aeration Chamber Volume 144155 gals. ! 77 GPM = 1861 min 1 1440 min 1 day — 1.29 days x 24 hrs./day = 77 GPM Flow Rate Reg. 1861 min. for turnover 1.3 Days Retention 31 Hours Retention 4-1"Aaye 9 4"'1.l<'� E. BODs LOADING: 1. Primary Influent - Formula: Total Waste (MGD) X BODsConcentration (mglL) X Density (#lgal) = BODs(#lDay)m BODS.=- mgILI�) Density = • 01gal 1.86E-02 X 2.E+04 X M - 3168 i1800dDay from waste 0�- L 0 �77 wI3 1/60 '. o[c MOM 10.10AM Page 4 Checked Approved C WTS Iwo 11897.01 '- -vl ..gyp Waste Technical Sef 4;vs, flit:. Wilmington, North Carolina J i'f'j 4 -til Because you are recycling effluent you must add the effluent 80Ds to the wasle BODE, � ; f%yflC Formula: Total Flush (MGD) X 80136Concentration (mg/L) X Density (#Jgal) = BODs(#/Day)(,) PV'd Flush MQ5 = Effluent BODS = rng/L design 9.30E-02 X 15 X 12 #BODdDay from flush 0 �FS�'!n �I�rI : r 13' Jr. { ,', b (c. TOTAL BOD, LOADING = 3180 #80DrDay Q Average BOD5 concentration is mg/L = Ibs / (MGD X density) 3180 1 1.12E-01 X 1:36 2. Solids Remove - a. Solids Volume in Waste - From previous sample analysis the average daily waste generated it P3 18598 GPD Waste bk 744 GPD Solids X 0.04 / 7.48gallcu.R. — Ak�.rsSC 1 i41 140rt L4jes k:S li (�RfW�C Ww" 10:10air Page 5 �n LD Ln m m co 3409.28 mg/L 5a z 0 z solids by volume. a = 744 GPD Solids M 7qf or Lr � �y Y°� rr►� t � 99 cu.ft. Solids Oki Checker} D Approved C WTs 1wo .m CU r A Waste Technical Services, inc. Wilmington, North Carolina V6f1JJ9Q1 i (es7.oi b. Separator Efficiency - Assume the solids separator removes 744 GPD Solids X D,30 223 GPD Therefore 18598 GPD Waste - 7.48gallcu, ft. _ 7 of the Solids. ( this its conservative ea most separators witl remove 49 to 700/01) 223 Gpn Sollds removed before treatment 223 GPD Solids removed 30.cu. M. Solids removed before treatment ;s ,Jwl7 a 18374 GPD Waste goes to the aeration chamber The remaining solids, approx. S21 opo, feed the Anoxic Basin. As the Activated Sludge level increases within the system a portion is removed by the Sludge Litt Pump and pumped to the Sludge Tank .This Activated Sludge Is pumped to the Aeration Chamber as Return Activated SluAay (RAS! and a portion is wasted. Was-Was-tg ActivatedSludge s). and combined with the daily in luerd being processed through the separator. Soma of tine sludge is non -settleable and will remain In suspension, leaving the Clurifroallon Chamber in the efHueM. 1 1 `� v �!` 9oY—�/ � C 1i C',., anS '1 wae6vfiV) t1'+f Grlf"`f V'� t 5r2tU'9e 11010 AM 3_ Seoondary Influent - Assume removal of 30% of the organic solids lowers the waste BOD5 by (this has been shown to be true in other treatment plants) 3168 X 90% = 2851 #BODB 1 Day from waste oL o Ic KC TOTAL BOD5 TO PROCESS = 2863 #BODs1Day Flow (MGD) = Primary flow - solids removal = 1.11E-0tl MGD Average Daily Flow Rate cJ �� Page 6 Checked Approved C wTS Igoe Waste Technical Wilmington, North Carolina co WASTE IEREATMENI SYSTEM SIZING ar _LO Average BOD5 concentration of Secondary Influent is mg/L = Ibs I (MGD X density) o 2863 1 1,11E-01 X 8.36 = 3076.76 mglL Average BODE Input to Aeration Chamber F. OXIDATION REQUIREMENTS Oxygen requirements for oxidation of carbonaceous organk matter and Nitrogen can be estimated as: t'l o 1. Oxygen r2guired for carbonaceous orgaa[)ic matter - O. _ (0) (So) (8.34) Ln �, m 1.11E-01 X 3060.76 X 8.34 = 2842 # 0=1 day ac, 111rb� �� 2v�f 1 dare t Po*o fly Ok Where Oc - Carbonaceous matter oxidation requirements, Wday 0 = Average daily flow rate, MGD So = Secondary Influent BOD5, 3076 mgfL - 7D84.78 — 15 mglL ett. GODS 2. Oxygen required for Nitrogen ooMersion - ON =10) (4.57 - 2.86) (No) (S.34) (assuming complete denitrification) � •�:„�41r, Denf HifcaVon Irr Me anWc rom satislia3.approximeteiy 186 #O,AVNO= consumed453 � [{haste) oftj t4:s 1.814E-02 X 71 X 2202.00 X 8.34 — 577 # Op I day z d • 0) y q 4! r[[lj i PL"1 r�i.Jf ZoA-)Z•i De, Val Ya•C1d1Q.. Or— Because you are recycling effluent you must add the effluentTKN to the waste TKN. (Flush} c� rn 9.30E-02 X .71 X 20.00 X 8.34 — 27 # O;1 day tz Where ON Nitrification requirements, Vday n = Average daily flow rate. MGD 4.51- 02 faquired for n1tr1kation, 90ATKN N. - Waste lrftant TKN mglL ti.4t - 220Y.00 it mglL elf. TKN 2.88 - 02 satisfied by denMfication, ag0VM03 consumed Checked TKN concentration as:unties 30% reduction due to primary etarifir.Mlon. rsl T p T�, r�ak�s Z 4�,iu ,r`�'iS a�� Mf) ,� �✓ f�!ok�d Approved , n,t,, �� 3©/ ,JF n f!• rkt/ . m r>n6lsa , r .•rd c� �,I t �' I ft.e 9 P7 x its., c WMlow 10:10 AMre1, d age S� S. �. 7Kti I rwd to m be r1 .y�4, ,� , W .. r 4A M Waste Technical Services, 41U. Wilmington, North Carolina 113897.01 Total Daily Oxygen Demand = Oc + ON W 3416 # O21 Day 74t14 �� G. AERATION SYSTEM REQUIREMENT& 1. Aeration Chamber Volume Requirements - (based on retention time desired) Volume (gallons) required for hydraulic loading = 111566.29 gallons 2. Aeration Chamber Air-ReguireM2nts - Convert the Daily Oxygen Demand (#/day) to Aeration Volume (cur�Rnl_min). en 0'1 rim m Retention Time = 1 days JJ Daily 02 Required = 3446-- #Iday WC Air is approx. 23% Ox therefore, one (1) cuff of air @ 6 psig, 1400 -1 BT F contains 0.021 # Oz Oxygen transfer efficiency for diffusers is approximately Set pi1NSW Mfg, [MIN 0 AR = Oo 1 off. / density 11440 3445.74 1 0.18 1 0.021 1 Where Aq a Air Pow required !a provide da8y oxygen demand Op = Daily oxygen demand b128M 10:10 AM p'aye 8 1440.00 - 637 CFM C.33.arc Use MffMICFM for Design (126%) 0 LL r QC JI W ud Checked Approved C Wys Iwo LO Lo Ln m m Z' OD r� N Ln 9 D m to X :�.mrss Waste Technical Service , Wilmington, North Carolina WASTE TREAT ,NT_ SYSTEM SIZING 11897.Qt ` '' t� [�, t+S o/} G •! H �� a� �,'r..2 � a`� �I R. ,r,,�f �. P"1 i n (�4 tlln�r H. ANOXIC CHAMBER REQUIREMENTS: U -y l rir�ov.rf� �locwq,•.Pi C..�r1 ►'S ��of4�� r�FI �'r,�i1� You nee :hr)setention for denilriflCatiOn (based on plant influent flow onIY),i2.3i Flow rate is Formula: Detention time (hrs.) : tank volume In gallons X 24br./day 1 flow in gpd 2 hrs = Tank Volume X 24 / 77 X 1440 r L S�rt S-"l ,W.C- 77 GPM Chamber Volume T 2 X 77 X 1440 ! 24 = 9297 GALLONS ANOXICCHAMPIER OLUME N7_4 GALLONS 6CILIAL BET NDON TIME includinaRAS flow* 0 'It the total retention period exceeds 1.5 hours with recycle flaw included the developmerg o sludge Is encouraged. (3) This reterdiQn time is Car .3°/b recycle. A .5% recycle A provide a rate less than 1.5 hours. i. CLARIFICATION CAPACITY: 1. Retention time - b�- jkA bl f v k J Clarification vol. needs to provide a minimum of *M hrs. retentionlA, at a design flow of 77 GPM Flow Race (GPM) (minlhrl hours 77 X so. X 2 — 9297 Gallons ACTUAL GLARIFICATIION CH6MI98 VOLUME I 11J10 L N C T HQURS Checked Approved — 1142Me 10:10AM Page 9 C wig lose ,.n cn m m OD D G) m F" N .A Waste Technical Services, itie. ;�Ja Wilmington, North Carolina i;e47.01 y 2, Surface Overflow Rate _ The Clarification Chamber design should provide a maximum surface overflow rate (at design flow )of 300-600 gaI11(2 - day.tal Flow Rate (GPM) X 1440 (mWd) 77 X 1440 J. SLUDGE HANDLING: 1. Biological Sludge Production - A Conventional Aeration system produces approximately This calculation assumes that all BODs Is removed 2863 Wday SOD removed X 0,55 2. Return Activated Sludge (RAS) - Thj s f s A Conventional Activated sludge plant should teturn 'L0 t cri�l r;W 6a �, 641k P In,, �s 111342 gpd flow1 1 ,L(/ X R I� f i� 3. Waste Activated�ludge (WAS) Wasted activated sludge is approKlrmately 111342 gpd now X Surface Area mlt 288 = 387 gallft' - day lbs. of sludge volatile mattter per pound of BOD removed,") f# Sludge/#BOD - /?.t- u(c'el4e, �of the total idcoJnfng flow. 1� 0.30 - 33403 �of the total incoming flow. 42) 0.05 = 5567 S.l;jx 1675 ' # Sld Ida 188.81 gpd, C— 6s 0 z .3:1 recycle ratio d Ln gpd RAS irate n m gpd WAS rate 4. Total Solids/Sludge Wastinsa - 521 gpd solids + 5567 gpd sludge 1 6088 gpd waste The Waste Sludge is returned to the Equalization Tank and processed through the Solids Separator Checked Approved_____^__ m a►2s►se _ 10:1oAM Page 10 C vrMIM W w A Waste Technical Servicra, inc. Wilmington, North Carolina WASTE TREATMENT_SYSTEM 31M 5.Desian MCRT - SS in Aeration Systemflbs) MLSS = 000.0mgfL design SS Wasted (lbslday) * SS Lost in Effluent Waste SS 100DO.00 mglL design Eff SS = X t t rng/L design 3606,75 464.30 + 27.86 MCRT = 7.33 days K FLOW BALANCE, Gallons of flush water / day .................. Gallons of waste I day ............ ............................................ Gallons of fluid to Separator Inlet I day ............................. Gallons of Solids removed by separator / day ...................... Gallons of influent(= Effluent discharge) I day ......................... Gallons required for flush / day .......................... ........... ....... Average 9296E GIRD 18598 GPD Maximum Minimum 111565 GPD y �. ..S•: �� •' l:' N :mot •;,p •��..��. -,� -223 GPD 111342 GPD -92968 GPD Gallons Excess routed to pond I day .. ...................... • ............ 18374 GPD List of References: (1) at_ Jlm Barker, NCSU, animal waste analysis (2) OPERATION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PI ANTS -1996, Ah Ed; Calif. State University (3) PHOSPHORUS and NITROCEN REM9yAFROM MUN1, WASTEWAMER - 4991, 2nd Ed; Richard Sed1ak (4) From recent operating system analysis (Cherry Farm and Dogwood Farm) (5) • Slid-t }quid Separation of Animal Manure- - 1997, R.H. Zhang & P.W. Westerman, American Society of Agricultwal Engineers 5128M 10:10 AM Page 11 Checked Approved C wra lose COWAWC, tx Revised April 20, 1999 JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION. Facility Numb Farm Name: On -Site Repre Inspector/Rev Date of site visit. Date of most recent WUP: -�C _ d Annual fanm'PAN deficit: pounds Operation is flagged for a wettable acre determination due to failure of Part 11 eligibility items) Ft F2 F3 F4 Operation not required to secure WA determinatio a based on exemption E1 E2 E3 E4 Operation pended for wettable acre determination based on P1 P2 P3 Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler, 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system; 4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe; 6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.) V/-""El Adequate irrigation design, including map'depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an 1 or PE. E2 Adequate D, and D31D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE. E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP. E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE:75 % exemption cannot be applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part It. Complete eligibility checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part Ill). PART 11. 75% Rule .Eligibility Checklist and -Documentation of WA Determination Requirements. WA Determination .required .because operation sails :one of .the .eligibility requirements listedbelow: _ F1 Lack .ofacreage:whichTesuiiedin:over:-applicationmfwastewater_(PAN) on:spray_ fields) accordingdofarm'sJastiwoyears:of-Tmgation-xecords. . F2 Unclear,Jllegible, nr lack of -information/map. F3 Obviousfieid-limitations -(numerousAitches;failure#o:deductTequired_:.._. buffer/setback�creage;-or.25%:ofiotal_acreageadentified�iri_CAWMP.- iriciudes _ smalls irregularly-shaped.fields=fields-less -tham5acres -forfravelers-orlessfhan' 2 acresfor.-staiionarysprinklers). F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits feld(s)'s acreage -in excess of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111. Facility Number �- V5-`� Revised April 20, 1999 Part Ill. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule -for WA Determination TRACT NUMBER FIELD NUMBER',2 TYPE OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM TOTAL ACRES CAWMP ACRES FIELD % COMMENTS3 I � I I FIELD NUMBER' - hvdrant Dull. zone_ or:ooint numbers may be used in olace of field numbers deoendino on CAWMP and type of irrigation -system. - If pulls, etc. cross -more than -one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; -otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination. FIELD NUMBER' - must be clearly delineated on -map. COMMENTS' -back-up fields with CAWMP acFeage_exceeding-75% of its total:acresand having received less.than 50% of its annual PAN as -documented in the farm's previous -two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records* cannot serve -as -the sole basis-for-requiringa WA Determination_=Back-up#reldsTnust-be noted in the-commentsectionmrid must be accessible by irrigation - system. Part IV. Pending WA'Determinations P1 P2 Plan lacks _following -information:, Plan -revision --maysatisfy-75% rule based on adequate overall PAN deficit -and by adjusting -all field. -acreage -to below 75% use rate P3 Other (iehn process of installing new irrigation system):, Claire Reid Kalmar 409 Cole Drive Hampstead, NC 28443 5 December 1999 Rick Shiver Water Quality Regional Supervisor DENR/DWQ - WIRO 127 North Cardinal Drive Wilmington, NC 28405 RE: Camellia Farm No. 2 Dear Mr.' Shiver, DEC Z 0 1999 The owners of Camelia Farm No. 2 met with Mr. George H. Pettus and Mr. Bob Ivey with Goldsboro Hog Farms, and were advised that your office had contacted Mr. Ivey regarding the possibility of depopulation of the swine facility. Several concerns arise as a result of this action. A decision with the financial consequences of this magnitude should certainly not be made without the owners of the facility being involved. The owners have not been contacted by your office. The infortnation regarding the possibility of depopulation has come from Goldsboro Hog Farms which possesses no financial liability in conjunction with Camellia Farms No. 2. The owners have been in contact with your office, via a letter dated November 4, 1999, and the farm's ORC, Mr. Robbie Hatcher contacted your office the morning of December 1, 1999. The owners were contacted the same day by Goldsboro Hog Farms concerning your consideration of depopulation of the farm. There was no attempt by your office to contact the owners of the facility. Camellia Farm No. 2 is making every effort to maintain compliance with the issued permit through some very trying times. The flooding due to the recent hurricanes, which resulted in 20 (plus) inches of rain, contributed significantly to our problems. Although, given sufficient time, these problems can be corrected. To update you on the situation, the designers of the system, Mr. Hugh Hardaway and Mr. David Anderson, have been contacted by the farm's attorney, Mr. Richard Burrows, as to their intentions and time -frame for correcting system deficiencies_ In lieu of the fact that neither Mr. Hardaway or Mr. Anderson have been actively involved in the management and oversight of this system for the past 30 days, Camellia Farms No. 2 has made contractual agreements with other individuals for engineering and management of the system. To date ORC Mr. Robbie Hatcher and Mr. Stanley Miller have been hired to oversee the system operation. Mr. Floyd Adams, P.E., has contracted to design and oversee construction of a new equalization tank. Mr. John Gray of Gray Associates has been contacted about oversight and design of the system in order to successfully get the system operational or options and alternatives. On December 1, 1999, Mr. Pettus and Mr. Ivey met with Mr. Mike Jernigan, Farm Manager, and the owners to discuss temporary immediate actions to maintain adequate freeboard in the holding pond and adequate land to utilize waste coming from the holding pond. An irrigation contractor was on site to evaluate and price the installation of underground pipe and hydrants to facilitate land applications. The farm is preparing to start installation of pipe and hydrants this week and is preparing to plant winter grasses on additional fields to utilize animal waste. The farm's intentions are to install underground pipe and hydrants to access approximately 65 acres of winter grasses at a cost of approximately $35,000 to 5 December 1999 Page Two of Two ensure that it can maintain a compliant level in the holding pond and to apply animal waste at agronomic rates. The intent is to utilize the aforementioned specialists to make the system operate in an effective and economical manner. Also, the top of the dike surrounding the holding pond will be regraded in the next 7 days, weather permitting, in order to maintain a consistent elevation. around the structure, as there is a low corner on the N.W. section of the pond. Furthermore, the farm is exploring several different technologies that may be incorporated into the current system or replace the current system. Please be assured the owners are exploring every possible avenue in order to maintain compliance. The farm has spent over $300,000 to install an alternative technology when a permit was in hand to construct- atypical anaerobic lagoon at a cost of only $100,000. The farm has spent a great deal of money with the intent to maintain an alternative technology waste system that was promoted by the Governor and the state in general. Please take this information in consideration and allow us time to find solutions to the problems we have encountered with the system. The additional measures we are taking will ensure there will be no discharges from the facility and that it can operate compliantly with the additional land to apply waste. Any future correspondence should be directed to Mrs. Claire Reid Kalmar, Owner, Mr. Mike Jernigan, Farm Manager, and Mr. Bob Ivey of Goldsboro Hog Farms, Sincerely, Claire Kalmar Owner PC: Mr. Bob Ivey, Goldsboro Hog Farms Mr. Dean Hunkele, DWQ/WIRO State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor '= Wayne McDevitt, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director June 1, 1998 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Claire Kalmar Camellia Farm No. 2 409 Cole Drive Hampstead, NC 28443 Dear Claire Kalmar: _Z.'FCEIVED AJ0A JUN u 41998 D E N R Subject: Camellia Farm COC No. AWS310856 Duplin County, NC The subject facility was issued a Certificate of Coverage (COC) on August 4, 1997 authorizing the construction and operation of a new swine waste management system. You were sent a letter (attached) on October 17, 1997 regarding changes in the Swine Farm Siting Act (Siting Act) and advised to make changes to the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan to reflect these changes and submit for approval. Our records show that you have received the October 17, 1997 letter but have not officially responded to that letter to this date. You are once again requested to submit by Jul 1, 1998 a notification to this office whether the farm was under construction on or before Aug. 27, 1997. It the farm was not under construction on or before Aug. 27, 1997, then a revised Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be submitted to reflect the new siting requirements. Construction not in compliance with the Siting Act is a violation of State Statutes and could result in revocation of permit. If you have any questions or comments concerning this matter, please contact Sue Homewood at (919) 733-5083 extension 502 or me at extension 540. i Sinc re Kim H. Colson, P.E., Supervisor Non -Discharge Permitting Unit cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section Permit File P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone (919) 733-5083 FAX (919) 733-0719 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Date: April 3, 1998 COUNTY: Duplin Permit No. AWS3100872 PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Facility and Address: Camillia Farms 1&2. 2. Date of Investigation: 3-25-98 3. Report Prepared by: David Holsinger 4. Persons Contacted: Mike Jernigan, Camillia Farms Telephone Number: 910-270-9606 5. Directions to Site: NCSR 1355, Approximately 1.6 miles Southeast of Faison, NC. On West side of road. 6. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading): 449.99 acres in tract. 7. Topography (relationship to 100 year flood plain, map included): Field areas composed of some Autryville, Norfolk and Goldsboro with Rains soil types. Area has been recently ditched to lower the Seasonal High Water Table (SHWT.) Attach a U.S.G.S. map extract and indicate facility site. USGS Quad No: N3500 - W7800/7.5 USGS Quad Name: Warsaw North, N.C. Latitude: 35 06 00 Longitude: 78 07 00 8. Any buffer conflicts with location of nearest dwelling and water supply well? No X 9. Watershed Stream Basin Information: a. Watershed Classification: Unnamed Tributary to Goshen Swamp - "C-Swamp" b. River Basin and Subbasin No: Cape Fear River Basin 03-06-22 c. Distance to surface water from disposal system: Site plan not specific. Sites observed during visit have been ditched to lower SHWT. However, facility setbacks could not be observed at this time. 1 PART II - DESCRIPTION OF WASTES AND TREATMENT WORKS 1. a. Volume : 192,000 (Design Capacity) 80,000 and 112,000 GPD Residuals: 118,990 cu. ft./yr. Or 3,718 tons per year. b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater: Undetermined 2. Treatment Facilities a. What is the current capacity of the facility? NIA b. What is the proposed capacity of the facility? 2320 Sows + 14,000 Topping upon completion. c. What is the total proposed animal population? est. 40,000 Sows and pigs. d. What is the actual treatment capacity of the current facility (design volume)? 0.192 M.G.D. e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed wastewater treatment facilities: Some site areas cleared. Ditching completed to lower SHWT. f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities: Activated sludge process package plant with solids separation, anoxic nitrogen reduction and waste water re=use. Surface land application of residuals and effluent. 3. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme at agronomic rates by mechanical spreader. 4. Treatment plant classification: Class III. 5. SIC Code: Land application of sludge and solids PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION 1. Owner of Operation: Kalmar I, LLC 2. Agent or Representative of Owner: Clair R. Kalmar, Manager. 3. Mailing address: (0): 409 Cole Drive, Hampstead, 28443. (R): Same. 4: Telephone number(s): (0): 910-270-9606 (R): Same. S. Other Special Items: 2 PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Review of this application and visitation of the site has raised several serious concerns and observations: 1. As stated, Influent loading rates are much higher for swine waste than human waste. Worksheet calculations indicate that the aeration system of the plant cannot provide sufficient air for the biological process. In addition, the equalization basin should be aerated. 2. Influent should contain a bar rack and box to collect solid objects such as syringes, medicine bottles, rubber gloves, light bulbs, and other debris commonly observed in storage lagoons. Solid materials should be placed in garbage cans and land filled. 3. Clarifier plan and clarifier tank section indicate these components being placed in "series". This will, in effect, hydraulically overload the clarifiers. Revise to place clarifiers in "parallel." 4. Air lift pumps and skimmers may be undersized for the volume of sludge generated from swine wastes. It is anticipated that large volumes of sludge will be generated requiring increased sludge return and sludge wasting. 5. Are residuals to be stabilized? Residuals handling plan is cursory and does not address. 5. Air lines are PVC. Consider using galvanized pipe instead. 6. No monitoring plan has been included. TKN, NO2+NO3, NH3, BOD5, and all nutrient parameters should be analyzed on a monthly basis at the influent and effluent locations to determine plant characteristics and removal efficiency. A monthly monitoring report must be submitted to Mr. Rick Shiver, 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 28405. 7. Include documentation of "waste factor per head" used in calculations. 8. Appropriate soils report. 9. Spray fields should be hydraulically limited in addition to the nutrient limitation in the designed waste utilization plan. Special attention should be given to appropriate setbacks, buffers, spray equipment and spray scheduling. 10. Include map delineating disposal areas in relation to flood plain. 11. Recording flow meter required. 12. Groundwater permit review should be included. 13. Propose post aeration prior to the polishing pond. 3 14. Pond structure to meet current DWQ lagoon requirements. 15. Standby power should be required. 16. Blower check valves required. 17. Any time that the system fails to function properly, or that the fields are being hydraulically or organically overloaded, additional land for spray irrigation will be required. In addition, DWQ must be notified of the problem and action plan to correct problem(s). FINAL REC0AEUENDATION: Review of this application and visitation of the site has raised serious concerns. In short, It appears that the basic process design is not sufficient to handle the proposed loadings. Appropriate site plans, residuals handling plans, monitoring plan and soils reports have not been included. Data provided from another system being studied by NCSU appears to be inapplicable to this facility. Major revisions addressing the concerns outlined above must be completed and reviewed prior to this office recommending the issuance of a one year conditional Individual Non -discharge Permit to this facility. Signature of ep e r Water Quality Regional Supervisor S:IWQS\DAVEHIDUPL N\CAhff .T lA.REP 7 Date Date 4 RATING SCALE FOR CLASSIFICATION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS Name of Facility: CAMFLLTA FARMS 1 & 2 Owner or Contact Person: Claire R. Kalimar, General Manager Mailing Address: 409 Cole Drive, Hampstead, NC, 28443 County: - T)tzpi;,, Telephone: 910-270-9606 Present Classification: N/A New Facility X Existing Facility NPDES Per. No. NCoo Nondisc. Per. NO.WQ Health Dept.Per No. Rated by: David R. Holsinger _ Telephone: 910-395-3900 Date: 3/24/98 Reviewed by: Health Dept. Telephone: David R. Holsinger Regional Office Telephone: Central Office ORC: Grade: Telephone: Telephone: Check Classification(s): Subsurface - Sp Irrigation � Land Application Wastewater Classification: (Circle One) 1 II ill IV Total Points: 58 I► ::►1 ':.� �. :►� :s � .a.►tl::�. ��. li.,:al �1■.�■.: :► lall� a �. I►� �`!1: tia�� 1.�► :.; ►� ��.�. � : �� i :71 l:- . L.:►l ��: lal � 1: w�� s, ]. V�� JI. :ate YI=,.. Spa 7,�1►. �•_ � �1. L►:. SUBSURFACE CLASSinCATION (check at[ units that apply) 1. septic tanks 2. pump tanks 3. siphon or pump -dosing systems 4. �Tsand filters 5. grease trap/interceptor 6. oit/water separators 7. gravity subsurface treatment and disposal: 8. pressure subsurface treatment and disposal: SPRAY IRRIGATION CLASSIFICATION (check all units that apply) I.preliminary treatment (definition no. 32 ) 2. Lagoons 3. septic tanks 4.pump tanks 5. pumps 6, sand filters 7.__ grease trapinterceptor 8. oil/water separators 9. disinfection 10. chemical addition for nutrientlalgae control 11, ✓ spray irrigation of wastewater In addition to the above classifications, pretreatment of wastewater In excess of these components shs11 be rated using tho point rating system and will require an operator with an appropriate dual certification - LAND �LICATION/RESIDUALS CLASSIFICATION (Applies only to permit holder) 1. Land application of biosolids, residuals or contaminated soils on a designated site. WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITYCLASSIFICATION The following systems shall be assigned a Class I classification, unless the flow is of a significant quantity or the technology is unusually complex, to require consideration by the Commission an a case -by -case basis: (Check it Appropriate) 1. Oil/water Separator Systems consisting only of physical separation, pumps and disposal; 2. Septic Tank/Sand Filter Systems consisting only of septic tanks, dosing apparatus, pumps.sand fitters, disinfection and direct discharge; 3. Lagoon Systems consisting only of preliminary treatment, lagoons, pumps, disinfection, necessary chemical treatment for algae or nutrient control, and direct discharge; 4. Closed -loop Recycle Systems; 5. Groundwater Remediation Systems consisting only of oiltwater separators, pumps, air -stripping, carbon adsorption, disinfection and disposal; 6. Aquacuhure operations with discharge to surface waters,. 7. Water Plant sludge handling and back -wash water treatment; 8. Seafood processing consisting of screening and disposal. 9. Single-family discharging systems, with the exception of Aerobic Treatment Units, will be classified if permitted after July 1. 1993 or if upon inspection by the Division, it is found that the system is not being adequately operated or maintained. Such systems will be notified of the classification or reclassification by the Commission, in writing. I_ List equipmeat proposed:-* ins NO Influent surge tang 7C Capacity: �(pZ Cr-t re=oval chamber X Flow srli tier box J - Ea, screen y( - COM=inutoz �C 1a€l•Sent iiov measur. device- _ - �: Type:-- ff' ue_, _`log: measur. device Aeration tank '-- ^ _ Number_ b _Ca aci � � Z / 1F^ _ Toy M cr Clarifier/Final sett? .-tank '�_ - Number & Capacity: �- _ tlf IUU _ =oTa Sludge-h_ldW tznk - - _ - I Number & Capacity_ I. _ -1 c A gap - El owers - - - - - - ^ - - - '(_ _ Nu=be_ & Capacity_ Tertiary filters Area:- - - - C'a_?orine contact tank Ch1cr-in.ator _ _ s fie: clj crine. re==vai . X . _ . .. - ` Pcst aerac_on to NY Capacity: ..__��e_t dossing tam ICapacity: pcycr !!+ fl{ *Ncza; r T'%'s infor=z=ioa is =eeded iz w=#Ing the facility description for the Au0crizaZion to Comstrucz. Qere indicated, list == bet' tPe and capacity of each co=ponent. _ 2_ Check design parameters and WDBS flits: a. Ve_^ fy IuDtS Q > Dsigm Q b. if effluent SOD t 30 8h I hertis~-y filters maybe required TSS < 30 mg/ -Coastal treatment facilities discharging to Sh or SB eaters requi re- tertizzy filters. c. L fecal colifor= <1000/100 i--disinfection is required. d. `- effDient D.O. >5ppm - post ae_ation require=. 3. Aerac_ou S. hazetica K7e � x 24 hrs/day >24 hrs Yes No — �{I�sv b_ Calczl Pte. $OD load:* n?S 11EOD/day-2 Yx£.34x �� FZD- ��.S te""'`• Ck"r tr � *Note: Use influent BOD - 300 e:gli for plants discharging to SA or -SS -atcrs 0 coanc3_ region; ocher-_-ise 200 mg/l is the usvan1 canccptracion ass;=ec. j _ C - Calculate air zeeced ror BUD ze=ova.l: QM for BOD re=oval = 2100 CF/lb x 655 lb BOD/dad 1440 mom/day d . Calculate air needed for mix{W : Cr i €or mi. mg - 25 CrM x 'Ac_arict. tz=k vol I m gal ( iOl G I r ) 3 00 1000 CF z 7.4c go/CF 7=t by Use larger Cr : value fre= (c) aai (d) In calculati;g total air requirnmencs (Ite= 5) 5uffi cient Air Prc:•ided Yes \0 7� 4. Sludge Eoldirig Oak a. Calculate air ge,eded for digesKon: Cr 4 = 20 CFM x Tanis volume in gal { /S?j F(4 1000 CF x 7.48 gal/CF L =its Acceptable Yes No -- .. .__..... .. -.v. _ sludge capacity > 1 Cc/pees;n P.E. Population Equa -Desi Per czn_ta c i Ll . = Capacity Tc= VA 7 gal / Q c e= Yes = *� 5- (e_xcluang r' l tar sccu ; Cow weeied Aeration Z Sludge holding tank —4 lifts @ 10 C't-H/lift ZO Post. aeratica ? 20 Cs2i 1000 CF7` Total 7 < sped=ied blower capacir-y Yes ho X b- Back --up blo::er unit provided- Yes- ( He 1 aeracion tank. 2 blo=-ers 2 tz=Lks - 3 bloters c_ 'tzca blower a c should be equipped ulzH a check valve anc gate valve - Check specs- m; o_ Clzx�__e_Jr.i.�al Secc3_rg lan1� - a_ Ca_c-.Aare dete ztion time: Detention time - V x 24 hrs/day - �,� hrs Q Shcv-ld be > 4 lirs for plants < 0.05 MGD > 3.6 hrs for plants 0.05 MGD to 0.15 Y.GD > 3-0 hrs for plaits 0.15 HGD up .b. Cal c::l are surface load:-g .race: Sur:ace loading rate Q GAD f_E7 z2 Area f t2 i 1 Should d be < 300 gal/S.F. for plaints < 0.05 .-GD < 300 gal/S.r- for plaints 0.05 ::GD to 0.15 FGD < 600 gal/S.F. for elancs 0.15 ::GD up c. Calcu ace weir loadi.wg race: - weir ioeding rate = Q < 1O,0O0 gz!/L F. Yes %� Yo j o zv l Sne weir 1 e:zgth; (ot, K 3 r -e t, 7. C^lor, e- Contact Tar-k z. Ca.Ic---7 ccctact time: Contac_ t^ e -`P x 24 hz-s%da 0.5 hr Yes No mechod- Tab 1 e -tti o_"s.^.aco=s OF: for Q <K, 0 GtD a — o. Te,c_a_-y Filters a. Dua.,_ €�? t cells required . b. Check rate: Yes No 1-1-- _ X r�en per t=lter c. Cheer clear -e?3 capacity for b-zc_',7,:asa stcrage: F_i= can nez3ed - Filter axes x 15 GIPM x 10 =im 9 Check =udwe-U capacity: �aclr-ay:: vois=e 1n.. low duri=g bac!c_-asu cycle O x 10 in 1440 m: -odz-v TOra II < C les No OK . .'Fes No $a1 ga-11 e. Check f' ze= media -pec L icaticz s : H_i gh race filters should hLz-. e 21" o€ sand and ant`_-ac;te. 9 _ Ot .er things to 'check and _do : a. Sludge disposal Ufor. Azion should be provided, indicating he o , Yhere aad by ahom sludge vil l be disposed of. (?e =it condition) b. Stand-by power needed for all faeil__ies discharging into a-11E Si or coyly-, Cl1: �+A__;J i�O OCR- c_ RecordiQflo, =eter aad totalizer rec•. fr& e= platys > 100,CCC G?D capac� t-- d- ;food Ez=zrd: Facilities should he s c-m to be above 100-year flood ele,a`,cz e. Imiluent surge tank, if needed, shculd be aerated i. Wfluewt dosingt ak if needed should have duplex ua:ps and � � p ::].all—LaLer alar�l g. till cur facility classification fc 40, .. I- List e^u_-'meuc proposed: YES NO Isflwect surge tangy - WC- Capacity:_ _ {� [i LAO - _ _ _ Crit removal chz=ber X `law box ---- - ----- --L't - - -- - Ba_ scree= - ------ - ------- Cc ;�:.utot - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - w-..._`?�.:ect�iov measur. dev{ ce �( - - - Type: - - -- - - - - =fj-2`n-flow ^- Cie- _ �'��fWkEl/L�D -silt- — _� Aer`tiou tank x -------------- - Nu=ber & Capacity: 2 ----_------_z��,�z4 'r- - — - - - D -- Clar= rier/F—a1 sect!. tzti X Nu=ber & Capacity: 3 ------------ --- - --- - - - - ---- -- -►- - -- S?udEe-holding -tank Nu=ber b Capacity_ 1- - -1 C;Il Blowers _ - _ - _ _ - _ .. _ �_ _ _ Nu=ber & Capacity_ 3_ ZSD ^ �SDC F►y+ Te_t_az= filters y( Area: Co? orl=e contact talc _-_ _ - - - - Capacity ` : - Q. - - - - .- - - - - -- Ty- __________ ________ -- ---—:�e_�-id•�:,a.lc��cr�e tP�val � • Pest acra_`_ou to X Capacity: - - ____,:ezu doOng ta.= ------------- ---;-- X [CaPaci&: - -- ---------- --- -- --_ PCVcr 41. Ytictc: _ems imfor=atioa is zeeced i.n writing the facility descriLtfoa for the iuthorLzatioa to Construct. there indicated, list nz=her, tape azi capacity of each co=ponent. _ 2. Check desfb para=ete,s,and N D§S T"-its:-'. a. Ce_^'_`y RMS Q > Design Q- b. I.; eff F „e=t BOD < 30 mz/l hert�`y filters maybe required T55 < 30 g/; - Ccast=.l treat,eat face; O es djscArging to SA or SB eaters require tertia<y filters_ c. of fecal coLfo= <1000/:00mi - disInfectiou i s required. d. If effluent D.0_ Opp= - post aeratiou required. 3. Aeration t. 2•etecio= 0"e - Y(1 OO�i� x 24 hrs/day >24 hrs Yes. NO t _ Mcni ate. BOD load:* ASSv+uiti+u 5c Q �07 ��iNc�r'ah l! BOD /dzy IAf-ma/I x E.34 z,(�[IZ tfC� - f "I ��']73ook rrLt9.. ibkc Sr-mV' SO "Note: Use iaflucac BOD - 300 mg/l for plazas discharging to SA 'or- S3 waters in coascul region; othe _vise 200 mg/l is the usuzal ca;centraciou assu ec. C. Calculate azr sc_eced Ior BUD re=oval: CF-H for BOD removal 2100 CF/lb z /1-/11 lb BOD/day 1440 min/day d. Calculate air needed for mfx{gig: CRI for =iximg 25 CFH x•Aeraticu. ta-- ~al i^ gal 1000 CF x 7.4E: aL-/CF Use large_ Cr i value from (c) asd. (d) �. cz-lculaticg total air reCLi;e;.c.its (=tee 5) Sufficieut Air Frc:•ided Yes \o 4. Slt:dge Holdi, g Tank . a. Calculate air needed for digestion: C.FM 20 Cam; x Tank volute is gal 1000 CF x 7.48 gal/CF - — - L;-its Acceptable Yes No X b. Verify udge capacity > 1 CF/persoa ' -------: - --' - - - - - esD=P_E_ rovulation � 100 CC ( ) G c c Per czpirn . sl dg2 Cg-Y Ey = TG iC vel= ^ ga- � 5_ LOi.` �LI-4r (exclua-g filter sC2U=; a_ Cr wee:ed Ae,ation Sludge hbldg tank lifts @ 10 CF=-f/lift Post aer`t_en ? 20 c?f 1000 CF Total ?- 1—i �-t 2 .30 >:r�/tee= < spec "ied blower capac=rs Yes ho- + b_ Eack-up blc_er wait provided. Yes^ is 1 as ration tz=.k. - 2 blo*zers 2 tz-1cs - 3 blo%ews C. Each blower unit should be equipper viz a check 'valve and gate valve. Check spec. PO Zz 33 c. Cl ri�izr/r1 al Seccl_ng lank z_ . Cal c lace detention 'Lime: Detention time x 24 hrs/day �� Z %rs 5SS ° Should be > 4 hrs for PUMts < 0.05 HOD > 3.6 hrs for plants 0.05 WD to O.15 MID > 3.0 hrs for plats 0.15 HCD up b. Czlculace surface loading.rare: Surface loading rater Q GPD . DAZ2 Area f t2 ( I ) Should be < 300 SOMA. for plants < 0.05 AD < 300 gal/S.F. for plamts 0.05 MCD to 0.15 HCD < 600 gal/S.F. for plants 0.15 MOD up - c. Cal culace vein- loading race: weir loediag rate = Q < 10,000 gal/fir. Yes so iI'L Olt/, ,-t' weir leugz L 3 33, 5 7. Mooing mcacit Tank a-. Calc • l a Contact t ccztact tme : V.x 24 hzzkay Q 15 hr Fes No b. ,TaN_ rice,d be�bfcflYesCje�� cl.?cr od, Table: 41 rizaco rs 0K t -r Q < 50 , 000 GFD. a_ D :mil f;? terse? Zs required _ b. Check load�iW ra e• L.R_ 1-25 G?IVSF Yes 440 -, e.a per f e, c. Check clear »el c.nacftp fur zcinash sccrage: �N- I"= ca? ne -ed -- Filter area x 15 Gt"_"_ x 10 -5 . F� d. Check aucae? l capacity': Backwash vol=e Iafloc during back Hsu cycle r0x 10=;n 1440 VOW Tatal < C Fes No No OK Yes No gal g �- e. Check R i ter media s?ec4 ricatiCzs: NO race fi?ters should have 21" mJal= cart` of sand a.-3d aac`_-acite. I • - 9. ocher L...ings to 7check zed ,do: a. Sludge disposal iaformatiou should be provided, indicac.=g 'rc::, Were aad by whom sludge will be disposed of. (Pe^it condition) b. Stand-by power needed for all facilities discharging iwo 1-11, Bl SA, cr S3 waLers f7. ��J_,� r�%u ..,c-�cr ly�.c.....,�.,,1.�{ ...; Cllli �1' •--+i{ CIL11 1 �Id....� c. Recordl&rflo*.: =eter and totalize: _e;0 ed cz plaacs > 10o,OCO G2J capacit: d. Flood hazard: Facilities should be s^ca to be above 100-year flood e,e,-z__- e. influent surge tank, if needed, should be aerated f. W luenz dosing caak, if needed, s otld have duplex puzps aac Agn-wale= alarm $. Fill out facility classification fc W State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Wilmington Regional Office DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: June 20, 1995 r Li TO: ' Steve Tedder THROUGH: Dave Adkins' tilt - FROM: Mike Williams SUBJECT: Sampling Inspection Results Innovative Wastewater Treatment Plant Joey Carter -Dogwood Farms, Swine Facility Duplin County Staff of the Regional Office collected influent and effluent samples from the innovative WWTP serving the Joey Carter Swine Farm located near Beulaville, N.C., on June 1, 1995.41, Results of the samples collected are as follows: Influent Effluent % .Removal : 6200% TSS 1700 mg/l 690 mg/1 59.5 % pH 7.7 s.u. 8.5 s.u. n/a Chloride 750 mg/I, 730 mg/1 2.7 % fyNH3 as-M-' _ 1400 mg/1'!---.�=�-1500fmg/1 °r, a-TK—MX NO2 + NO3 C 0.01 mg/1 c 0.01 mg/1 0.0 % P total:"* _ ` 190 mg/l 390 mg/1 PO4 as P 120 mg/1 74 mg/1 38.3 % * indicates increase A follow up inspection is planned for the next few weeks, once the system is back on line. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please advise. MW: CARTER3.JU5 cc: David Harding Wilmington Regional Office Date sent From: To: Subject: No problem appropriate. report. Mike Wed, 11 Mar 1998 11:58:50 -0500 "Mike Lewandowski" <mike lwandowski@h2o.enr.state. Dave Holsinger <dave holsiinger@wiro.enr.state.nc.us> Re: Camellia Farms 1 & 2 An informal e-mail will do, if you feel that's If you have serious concerns, feel free to write a staff Dave Holsinger wrote: > Mike, > I have not forgot about you. I am looking over the permit right now > and wil forward comment ASAP. > David R. Holsinger > Environmental Engineer > Department of Enviroment and Natural Resources > Division of Water Quality > 127 Cardinal Drive Extension > Wilmington, NC 28405 > Dave _Holsinger@wiro.enr.state. nc. us > Ph: 910-395-3900 > Fax: 910-350-2004 > "GO HUSKERS" State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources ` Division of Water Quality RECEIVED James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor FEB 12 1998 Wayne McDevitt, Secretary IC A A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., DireC V February 10, 1998 MEMORANDUM To: Rick Shiver Wilmington Regional Office From: Mike Lewandowski Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Subject: Animal Operation Camellia Farm No. 1 Camellia Farm No. 2 Duplin County Attached is a copy of the Animal Waste Operations application package for the subject facility. Because of this facility's innovative technology, they have submitted an application for an individual permit. Please provide your comments as soon as practical. If you have any questions, please contact me at 733-5083 ext. 362. cc: Permit File State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director October 17, 1997 CERTIFIED MAIL. RETURN RECEIPT_REQUESTED Claire Kalmar 409 Cole Drive Hampstead NC 28443 I ffl�5VA IDEHNF1 Subject: Kalmar 1, LLC COC No. AWS310856 Duplin County Dear Claire Kalmar: The subject facility was issued a Certificate of Coverage (COC) on 8/4/97 authorizing the operation of the animal waste collection, treatment, storage, and land application system in accordance with General Permit No. AWG100000. On Aug. 27, 1997 Governor Hunt signed into law the Clean Water Responsibility Act. The CIean Water Responsibility 'Act included several changes to -the Swine Farm Siting Act (Siting Act) including the requirement that all set back distances be met for any swine --lagoon- or swine house for which construction commences. -on or after the effective date of the Clean Water Responsibility Act (Aug. 27, 1997). Before the Siting °Act was amended, it required the set back distances be met at the time the swine house or lagoon was sited. The change in siting requirements may- apply to your farm since construction may not have -commenced .-by the effective date of the Clean Water Responsibility Act. Your farm was permitted prior to the effective date of the Clean Water Responsibility Act; therefore, you meet one of the exceptions to the moratorium. However, the farm must be re-evaluated and, if necessary, re -designed to'meet the new requirements of the Siting Act to remain covered under the General Permit. Within 15 days of the date of this letter, you are requested to submit, notification to the Division of Water Quality whether the farm was under construction on or before Aug. 27, 1997. If the farm was not under construction on or before Aug. 27, 1997, then a revised Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be submitted to reflect the new siting requirements. Construction not in compliance with the Siting Act is a violation of State Statutes and the General Permit. If you have any questions or comments concerning this matter, please contact me at - (919) 733- 5083 extension 540. Sincerely Kim . o s n, .. ., upervisor Non -discharge Permitting Unit cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section Permit File P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, forth Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone (919) 733-5083 FAX (919) 733-0719 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment, ,T Health and Natural Resources . Division of Water Quality r AUG fi J7 James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor BY. Wayne McDevitt, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director August 4, 1997 Claire Kalmar Kalmar 1, LLC 409 Cole Drive Hampstead NC 28443 LT."FA EDEHNR Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310856 Kalmar 1, LLC Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and Application System Duplin County Dear Claire Kalmar: In accordance with your application received on July 8, 1997, we are forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Farm No. 31-856, authorizing the operation of an animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with the State's General Permit (attached). This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Kalmar 1, LLC Farm, located in Duplin County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 11520 Feeder to Finish and the application to a minimum of 76 acres of land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2001. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals. Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC. - Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division. This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership. P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-7015 FAX 919-733-2496 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding. The subject farm is located in the Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff may be reached at (910) 395-3900. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact Mike Lewandowski at (919) 733-5083 ext. 362. Sincerely, -,/—A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E. cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's) Duplin County Health Department Nilmin`gton-Regional-Office,_W,atei Quality -Section Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District Permit File Animal Waste Management Plan Certification (Please type or print all information that does not require a signature) lExistinp, or (New) or Expanded (please circle one) . T. .. . : I (jeneral Information: Name of Farm: KA LPAAv- i , LLC Facility.No: 0w•ner(s) Name: C CA 1Kt= kA LmA tz- Phone No: 4+0. 210•" 460E Mailing Address:. 4oq r-oL0 P¢tyt; HA-+V1pyTC-AD, NC 28443 Farm Location: County Farm is located in: „ uEl,'N _ Latitude and Longitude: 35° 04' 64" / 'IS` 03' 54 Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: roan . 3n names, directions, milepost, etc.): TRA Vr, U si (- SvurH ON N W y 50 (112171 l rA-I r C N TKR N LEfr 0 tj CID 4 Z rn t4o;p- 4354 A-wi> TRAVEL AWIZpXiMAreLy 5 Nett -ESA FAP-M i5 LOCAT-E-7 IN SCu7ii GL'A-D-"WT OF 'r'i"te INT'E'R±F-Cr1DN OF N[stZ 135ti "v NCS,R t304, Qperation Description: Type of Swine No. of Animals D IN'ean to Feeder 5D Feeder to Finish 41, 52D D Farrow to Wean 3 Farrow to Feeder D Farrow to Finish Type ofPoulrry No. of Animals Type of Cattle * Layer O Dairy * Pullets 0 Beef t'i 1 No. of Ani» wish A ' Other Tipe of Livestock• Number of Animals: Expanding Operation Only . S -Previous Design Capacity. Additional Design Capachy.-, Tonal Desigrt Ca atilt•: Acreage Available for Application: 45 Required Acreage: 7b Dumber of Lagoons /Storage Ponds: f Total Capacity: 3,357, xFs3 Cubic Feet (ft3) Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one) If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or.SPRAY FIELD (please circle one) Owner / Manager Agreement I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and Will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management before the new animals arc stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal wastc. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be filed at -the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DEVI or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer. Name of Land Owner : kAtmkr- Signature: �/P _4 kh � � _ - — - - . Date: 02 IT(AW qT Name of Manager(if different from owner): Signature: Date: ANVC -- January 1. 1997 Technical Specialist Certification L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A 1tiCAC 6F .0005. 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM) as specified in I SA NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) andfor the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .00DI-.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may sign each certification (SD. Sl, WLIP, RC,1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically competent. IL Certi, j�cation of Design A) Collection. Storage, Treatment System Check the appropriate box ❑ Existing facility -without retrofit (SD or N UP) Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization requirements. J& New -expand ed Q[ retrofitted faci]jty (SD) Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds. have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum s>;jrt..4z44xd specifications. Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print ):A0^_ Affiliation. 1t1. F't_ds;O Qbiz Address(Agency): t?.o._&x ►a-9A. K tarigv�2 ,Ipc izmf�f Phone No.: 9to - 29G- tits e Signature: = s. Date:_ -7�2 (9't elie, 40YD�P: �,,�. B) Land Application Rite (N'4r UP) The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates. Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C-Ecr�Ci: H • p�rrccs Affiliation: GcvaS$ctco HOC- FNtS Address(Agency),: F -C• 'i-`Dx l e ccq "wsiwgo, tic. %7532 Phone No.:g,� '77B-3t3c 13 3utj 6 47 C) Runoff Contrd s frbm Exterior Mts Check the appropriafe ox .0 Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC) This facility does not contain any exterior lots. Facility with exterior lots (RC) Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS. Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): G-•t:GV-C-[ {i--&-t-Ri Affiliation: 6-61-T-715C -0 Ht6, FATLWM Address(Aaencv): PD gox lcooq C-00,2 Sis--n3ture: N e 27532 icNo.: I-1tq•77f-3130 13 JL04 -17 AAVC -- Januar%. 1, 19?7 \ 2 - I. Application and Handling Eguipment Check the appropriate boa 0 Existing or eXpandina facility with existing wasteapplication quit}meat (WUP or I) Animal Waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the Waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the plait). New -ex anded,_or existing facility without existine was a iDDUcation eauiotnent for snrav irrigation. (1) Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as pan of the plan). Q New, expanded. or existing facility without existing waste applicalign equipment-f-QL land spreading not using spray itrigation. (WUP or I) Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can. cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the plan). r Name of Technical Specialist (Please Affiliation: M. C-'t_4-n N917o.rs � �'•'•+'' -- ... T, Address (Agency): ? in, �ZaA, a2kq tCr�:.�A.sS.tr4tkkv ta3 3 Phone No.::2jes-rac-win 1223 Signature: 7 n Date: 71�1 s-� _r ".,, � ,�•:•..1tr •,, •ter. ! ,� E) Odor Control, Insect Control A4ortally • flt nEmergency AgtionPlan (SD. SL AVUP. RC or 1) The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and -Best Management Practices to Control insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility. Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C- Affiliation:_6'0LV7&'Ro MO(/ Fits Address(Agency): "Po eog 1000el arat�SF�r�rzy. NC- 27532 _Phone No.: qtq-T-78,3l3Q9 Signature: l Date: 13 Tb- 1 47 F) Written Notic of N N%v or Expanding Swine Farm The following signature ck is only to be used for neµ: or expanding smine farms that begin construction after June 21, I996. If the facility was built before June 21,1996, when was it constructed or last expanded I (w•e) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners who own property located across a public road, street. or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was in compliance with the requirements of NNCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list.of the property owners notified is attached. t:AGtL+TY OWNER IS *vTOtur NG L 04POWNSR hN Ai , 540M Name of Land Owner : cLAlRt: kAL.1vMAP. Signature: �'0 �C , '. r �, L Ys _ Date: Name of Manaber(if different front owner): 02 TgLY q7 Signature Date: a1;'C -- January 1, 1997 3 S �30 o t �1 ),goo ,go -- ._ _ . vA o�, r— (Le - Cr to �c�r.✓ C1 �(Vfce 4v C) [mac✓ y ly l cn =S f C 1 1 � . _. i � -- � - 4w�-,.�__01.'� c p�liyL ��j Gvt•Yrvrv,`�� _�1��'ivlc/ f`*��c_-�,^� "�BYz�ga�� ,.___�.-..�.__ �u � S � Iyd�' , by � �y - � w- S G►�n � �-._. _ �i��ei.-.. C, � Uv�� CLi�-.. ��--w Cr�...a� � x S • �� - G � ,,.1cc.""`u� ��._....... ..._�- WTS J.Q 11897.01 State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and .Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management Non -Discharge Permit Application Form {THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGIN, : VVA7 . ANIMAL WASTE OPERATIONS QUA1.1 8,50rloN I. GENERAL INFORMATION: f : Pam's name: /14 . 2''n-Dicc��cre n 2. Print Owners or Signing Official's name and title (person legally responsible for the operation and its compliance):: 3. Mailing address: �SQ 4 CO �C Citr: AaM4 5tleQ 52L State: Abe Zip: U3 Telephone Number: f /0 ?60 L 4. Latitude: V So f ; Longitude: U � WO— IY �,� o of Farm (if known) 5. Farm location (be as specific as possible including road names, directions, milepost, etc.): 3,5 1wj, Se- oP ratl on on ezg.< 61de of S2 /3sL/ 2 mi. Sty of SR /354 e )304 I er eita 6. Please state if this is a company. contract or independent grower: eoN71214 CZ 7. Print the name of the company or contract name (if applicable): — Kul' )SAS S, :Z�Alc 8. Ptint Managers name (if applicable): t 1 1 KE. T 21d IGAld 9. Print Lessee's name (if applicable): lJyZ - 10. Application Date:. / 1 — I Ll — nt -7 11. County where animal facility is located: JbtJ P L 1 N _ 12. County(ies) where the animal waste application fields are located: U f'Li r.i II. PERMIT INFORMATION: 1. Application No. (will be completed by DEM): 2. Specify whether project is: /X new; renewal`; X modification; new but existing" * if this application is being submitted as a result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list the existing permit number AUJs 3100 and its issue date — " If this is a new permit for an existing facility, some of the questionstprovisions may be inappropriate. Please complete as best as possible. 3. Has this facility previously been approved by regulation 15A NCAC 2H .0217 as a "deemed pernvtted non discharge facility"? Yes; X No Q a. Please list the name of the technical specialist who certified the plan: _ _ �(f'�'/ o f7�,)/w , �• Le 1 FORM: ANVO 12/95 Page 1. of 16 I W trE,�1C+�f iFy]rd+31 IV. INFORMATION ON WASTE: What type of animal operation is proposedlexi sting (i.e. swine farrow to finish, dairy cattle, etc): 4�> W I !fit✓ F I I IS 41 VC, 2. Maximum animal population projected (number and type of confined animals per cycle, cycles per year, total per year): y- e Volume of liquid waste generated by this project which must be disposed: _. , 8' �.Z gallons per day S 6 S, gallons per month . __. to., �88 f 27a gallons per year 4. Is there anv other waste stream included with the animal waste? Yes; __X,_ No, If yes. describe. What type of waste, how much, etc. (note: domestic waste shall not be added to animal waste streams): _ N A Is any dry waste land applied on sites listed in this application? —LV—, Yes; No X 6 /,A411) fi�1"6a / -S �2y W sTE If Yes. please complete the following questions: A. Please list the source of the dry waste: �rG - �rec��i�►4�n� /Y1C�i7Gc�CCer Tj7l�it�5 /u��//� B. What is the volume of dry waste lied? eS; y Gt �� ✓mod a�ra.ri �k� 7 t 5 f C /�� % 4�.rXS L�/! bl l�Ac� 1zrd�`I�d C. Identif%- the nutrient characteristics o tf he dry waste. lease nc ude a c emtc analysis of the dry waste. _SFE A v -1- z9,4 A21heq1 D. Are the available nutrients in the dry waste included in the nutrient management program for this facility? 51 Yes: No 6. Are amv commercial fertilizers used on the sites listed in this application? Yes; r'X No If yes. what and at w•hat.rate: 1'. DESIGN INFORMATION 1. Provide a brief listing of the components of the waste management system, including dimensions, capacities, and detention times of tanks, pumping facilities, high water alarms. filters. ponds, lagoons. etc.: 56 5 .sT Sr 6' CGS FOR'_1'I: AWO 12/95 Page 4 of 16 W rS J.0. 11897.01 2. Lagoon Design; (Please complete if facility has an existing or proposed lagoon for operation. Attach a separate page of this question 2 for each additional lagoon): a. 5pecif}' the storage volume required by the water balance: -- — gallons; days (required in Part W,f): b. Total volume of lagoon provided:. , /�1% 1151 gallons; Thy j�eo f /S L I . Volume for sludge storage: _ / gallons; /��p�j�� . �J y G'lh 47elW p /6 2. Volume for design treatment: gallons; G�7%c K /C� / aA) K S 3. Volume for wastewater storage: _ /�� gallons; ?f U How many days storage does this provide? days; VOTE: A storage time of six months is recommended. 4. How many acre-feet is the surface area of the lagoon: acre-feet. C. What is the height of the dike/embankment at its highest point?feet, NOTE. if the diketembankment is over 15 feet high and impounds ovef 10 acre feet of waste, a permit for dike construction must be obtained as required by the North Carolina Dam Safety Law through the Division of Land Quality. d What is the rainfall amount for the 25 year, 24 hour storm in the facility area: A1 t4 inches; Please provide data showing this. e. What is the design freeboard for the lagoon: NI,# feet; (freeboard is calculated �as one foot plus the heig t of the 25 year, 24 hour storm amount) f. is the la_,N/f1-oon lined?Yes # No. If ves. Please describe the liner, material used. etc.: /V 14 Does the liner meet the Division's requirement of 1.0 x 10-6 cm/second permeability rate? h*— Yes !" No. Please list the lagoon's liner permeability rate; _�- cm/second g. What measures are being taken to protect the //integrity of the lagoon dikes (i.e. vegetation, fences to keep out animals, etc.):, B✓!�% _ h. Please include all design plans, specifications and calculations on lagoon design as required by Part III.b..and Part Ill.b. of this application. 11,11-19 3. Name of closest downslope surface waters from the treatment lagoon: Lq 110 _LA-000Al 4. Classification of waters listed in 3 above: (as established by the Environmental Management Commission & specified in Pan VIII of this application - This classification must be provided by the appropriate Regional Officz prior to the submittal of the application). 5, if a power failure at the facility could impact waters classified as WS, SA, B, or SB, describe which of the measures are being implemented to prevent such impact, as required i_n/15A NCAC 2H 0219: --- FORM: AWO 12195 Page 5 of 16 WTS J.O. 11997.01 6. The animal waste management system must conform to the following buffers` [and all other applicable buffers as defined in 15A NCAC 2H .0219 0)(5)). A waste management system includes the animal confinement areas, treatment lagoons. animal waste application fields, and any other area used in the production of the animals: a) 400 feet between a waste management system and any residence under separate ownership, public use area, church, picnic area, etc.; b) 100 feet between the waste management system and any private or public water supply source; c) 100 feet between the waste management system and any streams classified as WS or B, any waters classified as SA or SB and any other stream, canal, marsh, Coastal waters, lake or impoundment; d) 50 feet between the waste management system excluding application fields and property Iines; e) 150 feet between any outer boundary of the animal waste application fields to any property boundary; * The following buffers became effective an October 1, 1995 and apply to any new swine farm (defined as any swine farm whose operations were sited on or after October 1, 1995 and includes modifications of existing facilities and new houses on existing farms) as ratified in Chapter 420 of the General Assembly of north Carolina 1995 Session. Any more restrictive: buffer listed below takes precedent over buffers listed in 15A NCAC 2H A219 0)(5): f) 1 W feet between the waste management system and any occupied residence, g) 2,500 feet between the waste management system and any school, hospital or church, h) 100 feet between the waste management system and any property boundary, i) 50 feet from any outer boundary of the animal waste application fields for the waste management system to any perennial stream or river, other than an irrigation ditch or canal. 7. If anv of the buffers specified in No. 6 above are = proposed to be met, please cxplain how the proposed buffers w17i provide Cgual or bener protection of the waters of the State with no increased potential for nuisance conditions: 8. Are any components of the waste management system and animal waste application fields located in the lO()-year flood plain:' Yes: X No. If Yes. briefly describe the protective measures being taken to protect against flooding. 9. Are any animal waste application fields located in wetland areas? Yes; --P-< No. If Yes. describe the actions taken to protect these wetlands and provide a copy of the 401 certification approving the use of the wetland or a copy of the letter from DFM stating a 401 cenification was not required. - Ati ' FJ FORINT: AWO 12/95 Page 6 of 16 WTS J.O. 11897.01 VI. ANIMAL WASTE APPLICATION FIELD INFORMATION 1. How many acres are provided for animal waste application? d acres �LL 1411 //Cz ��-C 2_ Please provide a soil analysis for each animal waste application field as required by Part Ili,}. j11/A- 3. Specify the hydraulic loading rate. recommendation, as determined by the soil scientist (required in Part Ill,g.): inches per hour; inches per week; inches per year 4. Specify the hydraulic loading rate that will occur on the animal waste application fields: —`V Iff inches per hour; /� inches per week; /✓ inches per year 5. Is the design hydraulic loading rate different from the soil scientist recommendation listed in number 3 above? WJ# Yes: N� No; If yes, please explain:. �r- 6. Spec& the acres available for the land application of animal waste: acres (DOib 7. What is the amount of plant available nitrogen from the animal waste (required in Part III,i.) 206 lbs/ cjce)S 9. What is the amount of total phosphorus available from the animal waste (required in Part I11,i.) �� lbs/An e 9. Based on the above information, what's the limiting factor for the listed sites (hydraulic or nutrients)? _ gt�c�1 er4S 10. Application information: a. What crop,. will be grown on these fields? Please provide a separate list of fields and crops for each. 6e5�� b. When will the application occur? (tithe of year, season) c. Please complete the table below: Animal Waste 1:1ilixation The following information can be provided by the MRCS or N.C. State Agriculture Extension Service Data Tables. 1. Amount pf Waste produced per year; SGG- al yST�/�7 �5/Gi+ r Ci4GL's . � Gvl c� WV A animals x �L/9 - waste per animal per year - total waste produced per year 2. Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen produced per year (if existing facility, use value from V1,7 to calculate); animals x Ibs Nitrogen per animal per year = lbs per year available Nitrogen 3. Field and Crop information )=ield, Number Found: \ pCr ACre Application Area[acres] pQjlnds. N u5cd Total Acres . Total Pounds Available Nitrogen (listed in 2 above) Surplus or Deficit_ 4. Do the crops and the acreage listed in the table use enough nitrogen to remove the nutrients applied by the animal waste each year? -Y- Yes: No FO1L11: AWO 12195 Page 7 of 16 WTS J.O. 11997.01 11. Please describe how- the animal waste will be land applied (type of system. traveling gun, permanent lines. etc.). Be specific. (� e1� `/rr-,,�t�f a.� Qn -qv�S5 L' 11. ease pro%ide plaits Ltd specifications, ptpi g diagoTams, etc. for the system listed above. A1114 13. The treatment and animal waste application facilities must be posted and secured in some fashion to prevent unauthorized entry. Brieflv describe the measures being taken: 13. What is the maximum application rate of the application system listed above? (please include units) 15. Are any of the animal waste application fields in this application under -drained by drain tiles or other means' Yes_ No. If Yes. please describe where the drains are located, what surface waters they drain to, how deep are they located front the surface of the land. and include any other pertinent information needed. 1il �i9 VII. THE FOLLO«ZNG FIELDS ARE TO BE USED FOR ANT MAL WASTE APPLICATION UNDER THIS PERMIT APPLICATION [PLEASE ATTACH MAP(S),SEE PART I11,mj: Application Area [acres] Maximum slope Field No _ Ceunnty° new (excluding buffers) _ (in percent) Note: If more than ten (10) fields are to be covered by this application, please attach a form listing all of the fields along with the information listed in Part III,m. FORT1i: ANA70 12/95 Page 8 of 16 WTS J.O. 11897.01 VIII. Surface Water Classification. This form must be completed by the appropriate DEM regional office and included as a part of the project submittal information. INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS: The classification of the downslope surface waters (the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow toward) in which this animal waste management system will be constructed must be determined by the appropriate DEM regional office. Therefore, you are required, prior to submittal of the application package, to submit this form, with items 1 through 7 completed, to the appropriate Division of Environmental Management Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see page 8 of 8). At a minimum, you must include an 8.5" by I l" copy of the portion of a'73 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located. Identify the closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the classification, reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and submit the application package. 1. Farm Name: �� /A f 2 2. Dame & complete address of engineering firm: 5 l lr� /G �� i// 9, • Telephone number: 910 3. Name of closest downslope surface waters: 4. County(ies) where the animal waste management system and surface waters are located: � 5.. Map name and date:.. 4U-) &k12 TN' i q 7 7 6.- NC Professional's Seal (If appropriate), Signature, and Date: TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been constructed or field located, as identified on the attached map seg ment(s): Name of surface waters: Brat A a Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission): Proposed classification, if applicable: Signature of regional office personnel. Date: (All attachments must be signed) FORM: AWO 12195 Page 9 of 16 WTS J-O. I lsg7m IX. SIGNATURES (Complete either page 10 or page 11) New Facility - any new or existing farm which will include with this permit approval- construction of any additional system, treatment. etc. which was not previously existing on the farm. Dame and Complete Address of Engineering Firm: rvic5 tic. City: 1 C �4Hl�S�`z7 _ ,—, State: W6 Zip: _ �g�Z - -- Telephone lumber: { lO -3 - Profession/al Engineer's Certification: attest that this application for has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I further attest that to t43 best of my knowledge the proposed design has been prepared in accordance with the applicable regulations. Although certain portions of this submittal package may have been developed by other professionals, inclusion of these materials under my signature and seal signifies that I have reviewed this material and have judged it to be consistent with the proposed design and the constructS4,Wj&s. North Carolina Professional Engineers Seal, Signature, and Date: ,2 (1 (qyq Applicant's Certification: // 1, _ G� �2�, .��A L �'!�� -_ ,attest that this application for /A�� f'/UN has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge: I understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and anachments are not "included. this application package will be returned to me as incomplete. Signature Date -A \ );g U -1 THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: ,NORTH CAROLINA DIS'ISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT' WATER QUALITY SECTION PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT POST OFFICE BOX 29535 R aLEIGH, FORTH CAROLINA 27626.0535 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (919) 733-5083 FAX NUMBER: (919) 733-0719 FOR-4i: AWO 12/95 Page 10 of 16 F1 ,technical s,, os TR 504 Compton St. Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 (910) 763-5003 WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM DESIGN CALCULATIONS FOR Camellia Farm No.2 J.0. 11897.01 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION WASTE TECHNICAL: SERVICES, INC: EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAWK—.-, .O ;a COPYRIGHT AND OTHER RIGHTS CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT: NO PAGES OF is THIS DOCUMENT MAYBE REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIONED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF WASTE TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC P �j Q\,r 2 I t M977 11897.01 Waste Technical Services, Inc. Wilmington, North Carolina Index of Calculations Page A. FARM CAPACITY....................................................................... 1 B. DAILY WASTE PRODUCTION....................................................... 2 C. SYSTEM PROCESS CAPACITY .................................................... 3 D. FLOW RATE/RETENTION TIME 1. Required Flow Rate................................................................ 4 2. Actual Retention Time............................................................ 4 E. BOD5 LOADING 1. Primary Influent..................................................................... 4 2. Solids Removal..................................................................... 5 3. Secondary Influent.................................................................. 6 F. OXIDATION REQUIREMENTS 1. Oxygen required for carbonaceous matter ................................. 7 2. Oxygen required for Nitrogen conversion...,....... ......................... 7 G. AERATION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS 1. Aeration Chamber Volume Requirements .................................... 8 2. Aeration Chamber Air Requirements ........................................... 8 H. ANOXIC CHAMBER REQUIREMENTS 9 I. CLARIFICATION CAPACITY 1. Retention time....................................................................... 9 2. Surface Overflow Rate......... ............... .............................. 10 J. SLUDGE HANDLING 1. Biological Sludge Production.................................................... 10 2. Return Activated Sludge(RAS)................................................. 10 3. Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) ................................................. 10 4. Total Solids/Sludge Wasting ........................... ............... 10 K. FLOW BALANCE........................................................................ 11 List of References........................................................................... 11 Waste Technical Services, Inc. Wilmington, North Carolina Rev .04 0912N7 WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM SIZING J.O. I1 FARM NAME: Camellia FariwN6.2 - LOCATION: IDUplin/NC COUNTY/STATE DATE: I FARM TYPE: Finishing HOUSE DESIGN: PIT RECHARGE NUMBER OF HOUSES: A. FARM CAPACITY: HOUSE. # MOO TYPE* NUMBER NOTES: 2 flii-11111111�1 W""", 1�1� f 3 011,11-1 4 5 F I 111 1 t%1.4 6 7 8 9 1511 1.10l 10 '1V 11111KI11111d.440 N = Nursery, F = Finisher, S= Sow TOTAL 1 14400 Head::] Page I 111/17/971 1. This facility has 20 houses each containing 720 head. ' calculations treat this as 10 houses with 1440 head each. 2. These houses will be flushed on 6 hour intervals. Where appropriate, values are rounded to the nearest whole number therefore calculated values will differ from those achieved using the whole numbers in the formulas. Checked Approved C WTS 1996 Rey • 04 Waste Technical Services, Inc. 08126107 Wilmington, North Carolina WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM SIZING 11 B87.01 B. DAILY WASTE PRODUCTION: HEAD HOUSE q (number) 1 1440 X 2 1440 X 3 1440 X 4 1440 X 5 1440 X 6 1440 X 7 1440 X 8 .1440 X 9 1440 X 10 1440 X WASTE TOTAL FACTOR XOTAL ELU§PERIOp WASTE/ food/head) WASTE NO Idaysl FLUSH laals) 1.23 = 1771,20 X i'7,Q0;d11Gi€` = 12398.40 1.23 - 1771.20 X GI I' I, F'R.If IIII''',lill!;I, = 12398.40 1.23 -- 1771.20 X s ' I' N ; O 'Ix#D� - 12398.40 1.23 = 1771.20 X �:; .,, 9°,QO�!� = 12398.40 1.23 = 1771.20 X,i 11'Illi!.l`s;' - 12398,40 1.23 = 1771.20 X 3MUT'Q(URE = 12398.40 1.23 = 1771.20 X 12398.40 1.23 - 1771.20 X 'l III' il! 'ICI = 12398.40 1.23 = 1771.20 X :'1�7sD0;�i� *. - 12398.40 1.23 = 1771.20 X 12398.40 TOTAL 17712 123984 Checked Approved Page 2 C WTs 1996 Waste Technical Services, Inc. Wilmington, North Carolina WASTETREATMENTSYSTEM SIZING C. SYSTEM PROCESS CAPACITY: Capacity required for hydraulic loading - ermined by House Flushing Requirements House # Length (f.) WidthDepth (ft) InAgmal Pit WaterIntemal Well Flush Volume Waste Volume Total Hydraullc YQIume (cult] Volume (cuft? 19el (W Volume (gall 1 2 3 4 5 7 9 10 LE. �i�1l; 'I'..il K I I I,'id 110it I I1' 'I':G. °: ri it's - I�ITII ESE Mull V= 0 El DRUM] M If' I! 1,1. II�'uaii' I I 1, m � uliD'��dl,. R�wddAwdk,.l1:61I I 1 ,- ! I o U; I 1 I ,19 U, u., I . ii f 8285.89 0.00 61978.46 12398.40 74376.86 8285.69 0.00 61978.46 12398.40 74376.86 8285.89 0.00 61978.46 12398.40 74376.86 8285.89 0.00 61978.46 12398.40 74376.86 8285.89 0.00 61976.46 12398.40 74376.86 8285.89 0.00 61978.46 12398.40 74376.86 8285.89 0.00 61978.46 12398,40 74376.86 8285.89 0.00 61978.46 12398.40 74376.86 8285.89 0.00 61978,46 12398.40 74376.86 8285.89 0.00 61978.46 12398.40 74376.86 ' The width of these houses Is the total of two houses. -� � I` Q.�n Number of walls Averages 61975.46 12398.40 Greatest volume flushed from any one house is 74377 gallons (waste plus flush) Flushes / Day = 1.5 (number of houses/flush period) Average Daily Flush Volume - 92968 gallons/process Average Daily Waste Volume = 18598 gallons/process Greatest Hydraulic volume to be processed is 111565 gallons/process Page 3 Rev •04 09125197 Checked 'Approve �-- C wrs IM Waste Technical Services, Inc. Wilmington, North Carolina Rev .04 0912&97 .11887.U1 D. FLOW RATE and RETENTION TIME: 1. Required Flow Rate: 111565 Gallons is required to be processed every 111565 Gallons / 24.00 / 60 min./hr. - 2, Actual Retention Time: 150079 gallons actual Aeration Chamber Volume 150079 gals. 1 77 GPM = 1937 min / 1440 min/ day = 1.35 days x 24 hrs.1day = E. BODS LOADING: hours 77 GPM Flow Rate Rea. 1937 min. for turnover 1.3 Days Retention 32 Hours Retention (Minimum) 1. Primary Influent - Formula: Total Waste (MGD) X BODs Concentration (mg/L) X Density (#/gal) = BODs (#/Day)(') BOD5 ==#/gal mg/L Density = 1.86E-02 X 2.E+04 X 8.36 - 3168 #BODdDay from waste Page 4 Checked Approved C wrs 190 .11897.01 Waste Technical Services, Inc. $n&a Wilmington, North Carolina WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM SIZING Because you are recycling effluent you must add the effluent BODE, to the waste BOD5. Formula: Total Flush (MGD) X BODS Concentration (mg/L) X Density (#Igal) = BODS (#IDay)t'i Flush BOD5 = Effluent BODE,='�mg/L design 9.30E-02 X 15 X 8.36 = 12 #BODdDay from flush TOTAL BODE LOADING = 3180 #BODG/Day Average BOD5 concentration is mg/L = Ibs I (MGD X density) 3180 1 1.12E-01 X 8.36 — 3409.28 mg/L 2. Solids Removal - a. Solids Volume in Waste - From previous sample analysis the average daily waste generated is solids by volume. M 18598 GPD Waste X 0.05 — 930 GPD Solids 930 GPD Solids 7.48gal/cu.ft. = 124 cuff Solids Page 5 Checked Approved C 'vrrs logo .04 • 04 Waste Technical Services, Inc. oRav av Wilmington, North Carolina WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM S .11897.01 b. Separator Efficiency - Assume the solids separator removes of the solids. ( this is conservative as most separators will remove 75%) 930 GPD Solids X 0.50 = 465 GPD Solids removed before treatment 465 GPD I 7.48gallcu.ft. — 62 cu.ft. Solids removed before treatment Therefore 18598 GPD Waste - 465 GPD Solids removed =18133 GPD Waste goes to the aeration chamber • The remaining solids, approx. "a GIRD, feed the Anoxic Basin. As the Activated Sludge level increases within the system a portion Is removed by the sludge Lift Pump and pumped to the Sludge Tank .This Activated Sludge Is pumped to the Aeration Chamber as R-atum Activated Sludge (RAS) and a portion Is wasted, Waste ActivatedSlpdag MAS], and combined with the daily influent being processed through the separator. Some of the sludge is non -settleable and will remain in suspension, leaving the Clarification Chamber In the effluent. 3. econdary Influent - Assume removal of 50% of the organic solids lowers the waste BOD5 by (this has been shown to be true In other treatment plants) 3168 X 60% — 1584 #BOD61 Day from waste TOTAL BOD5 TO PROCESS = 1596 #BOD5tDay - I I Y�I YYY YI�.+YYY•..IY Flow (MGD) = Primary flow - solids removal = 1.11E-01 MGD Average Daily Flow Rate Page 6 Checked Approved TN- C wrs I M Waste Technical Services, Inc. Wilmington, North Carolina WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM SIZING .11ss7.n1 Average BOD5 concentration of Secondary Influent is mg/L = Ibs I (MGD X density) 1596 1 1.11E-01 X 8.36 = 1718.05 mg/L Average BODE Input to Aeration Chamber F. OXIDATION REQUIREMENTS Oxygen requirements for oxidation of carbonaceous organic matter and Nitrogen can be estimated as:131 1, Oxygen required for carbonaceous organic_ matter_- Or = (Q) (So) (8.34) 1.11E-01 X 1703.05 X 8.34 Where Oc = Carbonaceous matter o)ddaflon requirements, #lday Q = Average daily flow rate, MGD S,, = Secondary influent BOD5, 1718 mg/L - — 1 778 # Oz / day 1703.06 -- 15 mg1L eff. BOD5 2. Oxygen required for Nitrogen conversion - ON= (0) (4.67 - 2.86) (No) (8.34) (assuming complete denitrification) DenitrNlcadon In the anoxic zone satisfies approximately 2.86 90..IM03 consumed. c3i (Waste) 1.81 E-02 X 1.71 X 900.00 X 8.34 — 233 # OZ / day Because you are recycling effluent you must add the eff luentTKN to the waste TKN. (Flush) 9.30E-02 X 1.71 X 100.00 X 8.34 — 133 # 02 /clay Rev•04 09nMsr Where ON - Nitrification requirements, #lday Q - Average daily flow rate, MGD 4.57 a 02 required for nitrification, #02/#TKN No = Waste influent TKN �mg/L h'4i - 900.00 mglL eff. TKN 2.86 - 02 satisfied by denitriflcation, #02/#NO3 consumed TKN concentration assumes reduction due to primary clarification. Checked Approved Page 7 C wrs 1996 Waste Technical Services, Inc. Wilmington, North Carolina 11897.01 Total Daily Oxygen Demand 1r Oc t ON = 1943 # Oz 1 Day G. AERATION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS: 1, Aeration Chamber Volume Requirements - (based on retention time desired) Volume (gallons) required for hydraulic loading 1111666.29 gallons AGIUTA „AERATION CHAMBER VOLUME 2. Aeration Chamber Air Requirements - Convert the Daily Oxygen Demand (#Iday) to Aeration Volume (cu ft/min). Retention Time = 1 days Daily 02 Required = 1943 #Iday Required 02 _ (#/day) 1 days retention 1943.33 1 1.35 = F-1445 # 02 Air is approx. 23% 02 therefore, one (1) cuft of air @ 6 psig, 1400 -1800 F contains Oxygen transfer efficiency for diffusers is approximately AR = On 1 off. I density 11440 1444.63 1 0.10 1 0.021 1 1440.00 Where Aq - Air flow required to provide dally oxygen demand OD = Dally oxygen demand Page 8 (2) 0.021 # 02 478 CFM �Ir�Y Rev •04 0912a797 Checked Approve avi C WiS 199e j Page 9 Rev - 04 Waste Technical Services, Inc. 0912M7 Wilmington, North Carolina WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM SIZE 11897.01 H. ANOXIC CHAMBER REQUIREMENTS: You need two hrs. retention for denitrification.(2) Flow rate is 77 Formula: Detention time (hrs.) = tank volume In gallons X 24hr.lday 1 flow in gpd 2 hrs = Tank Volume X 24 1 77 Chamber Volume = 2 X 77 X 1440 1 24 = ACTUAL ANOXI9_CHAM4EER_jQLUME ACTUAL RETENTION TIME = HQURS I. CLARIFICATION CAPACITY: 1. Retention time - Clarification vol. needs to provide a minimum of hrs. retention(", at a design flow of Flow Rate GPM X 1440 9297 GALLONS IM 9ALL03 77 GPM (GPM) (minlhr) hours 77 X 60 X 3 = 13946 Gallons ACTUAL QLAglElQAjJQht,.SttiA,l9,R YQLW , 16659 GALLONS ACTUAL RETENTION TIME M HOURS Checked Approve C WTS 1900 Raw • 04 Waste Technical Services, Inc. 0912&97 Wilmington, North Carolina 11897.01 2. Surface Overflow Rate - The Clarification Chamber design should provide a maximum surface overflow rate (at design flow )of 300 gallft2 - day.(3) Flow Rate Surface Area (OPM) X 1440 (minld) I (ftx) 77 X 1440 432 — 268 gallft2 - day J. SLUDGE HANDLING: 1. Biological Sludge Production - A ConvenWnal Aeration System produces approximately �' Jbs. of sludge volatile matter per pound of BOD removed«1 This calculation assumes that all BODY Is removed 1596 #/day BOD removed X 0.55 # Sludgel#BOD - 878 # Sid/day 105.23 gpd 2. Return Activated Sludge MS) - A Conventional Activated sludge plant shoul return of the total Incoming flow. (2) 111100 gpd flow X 0.20 = 22220 gpd RAS rate 3. Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) - Wasted activated sludge is approximately �of the total incoming flow.12) 111100 gpd flow X 0.01 = 1111 gpd WAS rate 4. Total Solids/Sludge Wasting - 465 gpd solids + 1111 gpd sludge -r 1-576 gpd waste The Waste Sludge is returned to the Equalization Tank and processed through the Solids Separ r Checked Approved Page 10 C wTs less Waste Technical Services, Inc. e;z51a Wilmington, North Carolina WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM SIZING ,11887.01 K. FLOW BALANCE: Average Gallons of flush water / day ............... ................................. 92968 GPD Gallons of waste / day ........................................................ 18598 GPD Gallons of fluid to Separator Inlet 1 day .................. .. 111565 GPD .............. Gallons of Solids removed by separator 1 day ......................... -465 GPD Gallons of Influent(= Effluent discharge) / day ......................... 111100 GPD Gallons required for flush / day .............................................. -92968 GPD Gallons Excess routed to pond / day. ......... .......................... 18133 GPD List of References: (1) Dr. Jim Barker, NCSU, animal waste analysis (2) OPERATION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS -1996, 4th Ed; Calif. State University (3) PHOSPHORUS and NITROGEN REMOVAL FROM MUNI. YVASTEWATER -1991, 2nd Ed; Richard Sedlak (4) From recent operating system analysis (Cherry Farm and Dogwood Farm) Checked Approved Page 11 C wYs IS% 4.1 I U A LE 1 61%167 LW LEGEND o HMRAW LOCATION. O PUP" LOCATION o--a b" PVC MAIN LINE MARE tWF 4" PVC MAIN LINE BUFM • . T RUST BLOCENG t f N ' DENOTES PIPE SIZE CHANGE ,r PM a u160OM APWA 3 RF-,CE1VED DEC 0 6 1999 BY: . IRRIGATION DESIGN CLAIRE KALMAR SCALE: V m 400' YOu SrlouGo �E'Cv�NG A �R r,?.zM Ms ►; Alm wrr 4 A pi" OF. V4k" pL W-r f N -dtr1J�m 6T-45S fltlll2ftArlt� • R � (2ol.t�s. r 1 � t \ s S 11 TlRtRT at,oaEM i1Ml: BE rscwom AT AM aalRa, T)$ MAD INN AWN Grim 519041. mrnmw vf= swum T>'Si><Aa1m 31 VAMME M8 SMAll, ae P WC 1a XQ WX W AND P rVC R 3W MR 211• AM Sw•w U au1R® TO HAVB AT LEAST } PUT OF 07VO. `,Np111111", ��►+Pq�1 CAgC 2273 S. Ss •�"QI �.. 9 , Prepared by: Murk Pope ��•` C$ed by M. to P.E. r tADate: Revised: August 5, 1997 r� State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director April 10, 1997 MEMORANDUM: To: All Interested Parties MAI C)EHNR From: Andy Oakley, Environmental Engineer, Permits and Engineering Unit Subject: Revised Application Forms for New and Expanding Animal Waste Operations , The Division has noticed several problems associated with the evaluation of the original applicationn ,^3� (AWO-G-NE 1/97). In addition, many applicants have asked for clarification in the forms required z mspe mn section. To alleviate some of these problems and to help clarify many of the questions, the Division as M revised the application form. The new form will be titled AWO-G-NE 3/21/97. nl= All future applications should be submitted on the attached form, to facilitate a more productive e and approval process. If you have any questions concerning this memorandum or the permitting process please waste permitting staff: • Andy Oakley (919) 733-5083 extension 533 Mike Lewandowski (919) 733-5083 extension 362 JR Joshi (919) 733-5083 extension 363 John Jallah (919) 733-5083 extension 364 P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone (919) 733-5083 FAX (919) 733-0719 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Non -Discharge Permit Application Form (THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations This application is for new or expanding facilities only. The design portions of the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP) certification form, Part II, must be included with this application prior to the application being accepted as complete. Application Date: 02 T"Ll 47 I. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided neztM item. 1 1. One completed and signed original and two copies of the application for General Permit - _ Animal Waste Operations; 2. Three copies of a genera! location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and field locations where animal waste is disposed; 3. Three copies of pages 1-3 of the Animal Waste Managemeat Plan (AWMP) Certification Form, including Part 11(Certification of Design Items A-F). If the facility does not have Part U of the AWMP completed, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application for animal waste operations. M 4. Three copies of the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP) used for facility design. II. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Farms name; _ k4LMAK 4, LLG _ 2.. Print Land Owner's name: CLAiPE kALMAR 3. Mailing address: 4Qq GOLE ImiV6 City: 14AMKTt=AV State: Nr- Zip: 24b443 Telephone Number: ( el10 ) 270- 41606 4. County where farm is located: DuP/_iN 5. Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): FROM NW-4 5o5ouTw , 1-RAV61 Erin oN Nc5R 435q- To 1"T K5rz0nVN DF klcS?t 13194 A, 1304. F*r." t5 '.pcAl- D IW So"TH 40A'D-p.AN r Of tNTEW76MON. 6. Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): 7. Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): FORM: AWO-G-NE 3/21/97 Page 1 of 3 III. OPERATION INFORMATION: I. Farm No.: (county number); (facility number). 2. Please complete the table below as it applies to your facility using the certified design capacity. The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed. Hof, wine No. of Animals Tyne of Poultry No. of Animals T= Qf Cattle No. of Animals 0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy 0 Feeder to Finish _ 14, 520 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef 0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey 0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow) 0 Farrow to Finish (# sow) Other Type of Livestock on the fares: No. of AnimalsL 3. Acreage cleared and available for application: q 5 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 76 4. Number of Lagoons: ; Total Capacity: 3,357,263 Cubic Feet (0) Number of Storage Ponds: ;Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (0) 5. Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the proposed application fields? YES or O (please circle one) 6. Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the proposed lagoon? YES or NO (please circle one) 7. Does this facility meet the siting requirements in Senate Bill 1217? (Swine Only) ES or NO (please circle one) What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? T140E- 17, I'M& What was the date that this facility's land application areas was sled? DECZ-mbelz 18, tQqb (wuQwstiT lEN) IV. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: I, Gt.A M 6 kA LM A R (Land Owner's name listed in question 112), attest that this application for ICALtvtktt t, L.LG (Farm name listed in question ILI) has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returned to me as incomplete. ` ++ // Signature �oQ_ ,.Q _^Date 02 TaLY R7 V . MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner) I, (Managers name listed in question II.6), attest that this application for _(Farm name listed in question IL1) has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returned as incomplete. Signature Date THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY WATER QUALITY SECTION PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT POST OFFICE BOX 29535 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535 FORM: AWO-G-NE 3/21/97 Pabe 2 of 3 N-. tip silk. I 4 ./ . . . � p\� - © �\ ! � . . ■ . . . �; ; �`� ice, �' {{ ' 1 �� . 7 � /: � ti. .r _ - _ r � ` .\ y � t r, 0 0 �\ '. +\_. \`- 1 �� i rr11 •� J : , .. A � ,,, • `� r „� ,.� fs�,�'' i � ,, 1 � �.. ,. ;'}/. i ,�q ff .t :ta \ ' 11 �� 1