310813_HISTORICAL_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

Environmental
Quality
Judy & Jeff Spedding
Jeff& Judy Spedding - Grower #296
292 Tracy Brown Rd
Magnolia, NC 28453
Dear Judy & Jeff Spedding:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
RECEIVED/NMENR/M Director
September29, 2017 OCT 0.2'201I
Water Quality Regional
Operations Section
Subject: Certificate of Co�eragtoRS310813
Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin County
In accordance with your September 28, 2017 request to change operation type without exceeding the
permitted steady state live weight, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC)
issued to Judy & Jeff Spedding, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management system
in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) for Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296, located in Duplin County, with a swine animal
capacity of no greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder:' Farrow to Wean: 2,591 Gilts --
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the'sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
This COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2019, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS310813 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established
for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in
number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP
and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of
animals.
Please read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit carefully. Please pgy careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality i Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
1636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WILT is inaccurate
you will-needtohave a new.WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any Iagoon,
storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Program for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition H.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You may
find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Newport/Morehead City, NC
National Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at:
h"://www.weather.Rov/mhx/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office staff
may be reached at 910-796-7215. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General
Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
S. Jay Zimmerman, P.G.
Director, Division of Water Resources
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Duplin County Health Department
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files (Permit No. AWS310813)
Smithfield Hog Farm

Environmental
Quality
September 29, 2017
Judy & Jeff Spedding
Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
292 Tracy Brown Rd
Magnolia, NC 28453
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310813
Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin County
Dear Judy & Jeff Spedding:
In accordance with your September 28, 2017 request to change operation type without exceeding the
permitted steady state live weight, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC)
issued to Judy & Jeff Spedding, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management system
in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) for Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296, located in Duplin County, with a swine animal
capacity of no greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: 2,591 Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each IS sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows,
This COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2019, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS310813 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established
for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in
number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP
and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of
animals.
Please read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit carefully. Please pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit, PIease continue to use the same record keeping forms.
State of North Carolina I EnvirUOlnental Quality I Division of Water Resoatrees
Water Quality Regions! Opt rations Section
1636 Mail Savice Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful -
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon,
storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143 215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Program for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition IL22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You may
find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Newport/Morehead City, NC
National Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at-
hyg://www.weather.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office staff
may be reached at 910-796-7215. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General
Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
al'o-i.cie
fQ S. Jay Zimmerman, P.G.
Director, Division of Water Resources
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ces)
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Duplin County Health Department
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files (Permit No. AWS310813)
Smithfield Hog Farm

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 5 ( - '..� County: L--,X) PZ—L,._1
Facility Name: J 6
Certified Operator Name: �.��1= cSP���7iN Operator # A WA -
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure B
Lagoon Name/identifier (ID): '/mil 4LT< j W
Spillway (Yes or No):
Level (inches): k-�r . 11 14_
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures. Five
and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list of the
proposed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop information.
Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to transfer of waste
to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste management plan.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: &
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached Plan
of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and correct.
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Phone: old" T,- 1 <80&4
Date: l
I n anager signature)
PoA Cover Page 2121I00

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/ldentifier (ID): __TL2ULTUJ2tr I - /="jic ltcSH� _
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker /-5- inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard P inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design ft2
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c x line d x 7.48 al_g_ lons _ 1 gCv `7 gallons
12 fF
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design c `CS ft'
h. actual waste produced = current herd # x line g
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
i. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i +j) x 7.48 x 30 days =
line f
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
1. current waste analysis dated /
m. ,(lines e + k) x line I =
1000
PoA► (30 Day) 2121100 1
ft3
I & 11ft3
,-51Z , allons
j lb/1000 gal.
lb PAN

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/identifier (ID): W nilucyUa,� Z
2.- Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard �c�� inches
c. line b - fine a (inches in red zone) = inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design IZ, Wo fe
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c x line d x 7.48 al�s = r_ 10 0 gallons
12 ft
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design
gQ days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design
ft3
h. actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
l Uft3
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
ft3
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
`��, ()()b ft3
k. (lines h + i +j) x 7.48 x 30. days =
6�5Us gallons
line f
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated k J� ��p t . 3 Ib/1000 gal.
m. (lines e + x line I = lb PAN
1000�
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00 1

REPEAT SECTION/ FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE
il. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ANDIOR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. structure ID:line m = lb PAN
2. structure ID: 60W line m = lb PAN
3. structure ID: line m = lb PAN
4. structure 1D: line m = lb PAN
5. structure 1D: line m = lb PAN
fi. structure ID: line m = Ib.PAN
n. llnes9+2+3+4+5+6 = 17�7.5 IbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAYDRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CAN NOT BE APPLIES DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s, remaining
IRR-2 PAN
balance
(Ib/acre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE
`IOOR)FIEL.D
column r x a
u.
application
window'
i C,
W `T'
-'40,
•(o
1
1-7
r ,
a
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available receiving crops
during 30 day drawn down period
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) _ ►„ 70, 2 _lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121100 2

IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) _ /-78-7 lb. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = /O r, 70, SS lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -, lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here
including pump and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd
reduction options, recalculate new PAN based on new Information. If new fields are to be
included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these fields to the PAN balance table and
recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to another permitted
facility provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
NARRATIVE:
:M I2,j2.1 U.. T /0 N on-ry 6-�x:r.577.- G �n'r-4y r-- /&L , 5 w' E rt.._
PoA (30 Day) 2121100 3

Dec 31 15 09:55j; J Spedding
[phone] p.2
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: � - �8 County:
Facility Name: �����Jl�!
Certified Operator Name: _ ��'�� Operator # 6 VA
1. Current liquid level(s)in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Structure t Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Lagoon Nametidentifier (IO): !�QW_
Spillway (Yes or No):
Level (inches):
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures. Five
and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
_ X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list of the
proposed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop information.
Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to transfer of waste
to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste management plan.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
- if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and Herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste. /2--Zs.5 -- /-5' —
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached Plan
of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and connect
-JG r- t7i���� -- Phone:
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
r (signature)
Date: /,Z` , -1-5
PoA Cover Page 2121100

Dec 31 15 09.55a J Spedding
[phone] p.3
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelldentifier (ID): U C �� - W C
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 fir. storm & structural freeboard inches
J
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design ft2
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c x line d x 7.48 ciallons =
12 ft
J,Z , .ZOO gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design ! $O days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design Q W
h. actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 127.() ft
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i +j) x 7.48 x 30 days =
line f
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated aIL3 I f-
m. Clines e + k) x line I =
1D00
ft3
7 UVV ft3
.7,31, q,313 gallons
/ . 8 Ib/1000 gal.
c6-V - I lb PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100 1

Dec 31 15 09:55a J Spedding
t '
[phone] pA
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE
11. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1 _ structure ID: 6Dw L4 GOCY11 line m = lb PAN
2. structure ID: line m = lb PAN
3.
structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6. structure 1D:
n. lines 1+2+3+4+5+6 =
line m =
lb PAN
lb PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAYDRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CAN NOT BE APPLIES DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining
IRR-2 PAN
balance
(Ibfacre)
L TOTAL PAN
BALANCE
FOR FIELD
(Ibs.)
column r: s
u.
application
window'
! 0
Pj G
W H6,-11
2-, Z-
ts-
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available receiving crops
during 30 day drawn down period
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) _ 7<10, g Ib. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121100 2

Dec 31 15 09 56a J 5pedding [phone] p.5
t , , .
1V. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = _ (_� lb. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) _ 71 1 0 , 6 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = — �aL5CID, 7 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here
including pump and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd
reduction options, recalculate new PAN based on new information. If new fields are to be
included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these fields to the PAN balance table and
recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to another permitted
facility provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
NARRATIVE:
i?,12+ &A�1U/,1 ON C v !E�X-07-i1,4c� �t�fZA rrE��_S
CUN T !� U6 A S VvEA+TH<m?— Ar-Lb
W J LL.
P(--jzMI(,
PoA J30 Day) 2 I00 3

Ju! 08 13 03:30p J Spedding
FAX COVER LETTER
TO: John Farnell
FROM: Jeff Spedding
RE: POA for facility# 31-813
Spedding Sow Farm
John,
[phone] p.1
Per our conversation, attached is the 30 day POA For high freeboard.
Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks.
Jeff Spedding
[phone]

Jul 08 13.03:30p J Spodding
[phone] p 2
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Faclllty Number: 31 - '&rru
Facility Name: 5Pk:EE17t-A-1C:_
County: 1D.. („ „) QL 11#
Certified Operator Name: 30CEZZ)t Agi, Operator # AWA " 18jej-
1- Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the darn for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways_
structure 1 structure 1 structure �j structure 4 structure o structure 6
Lagoon Name/Identifier (ID): SOW
Spiliway (Yes or No):
II
LeVei twcnes�: �r V
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures. Five
and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list of the
proposed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop information.
Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to transfer of waste
to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste management plan.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
- if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:I g
I hereby certify that II have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached Plan
of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and correct.
.�E- E �M 2)If-1 G Phone: of U " 5, 1a - aCY-u -
Facility Owner/Manager „(print},
ZS - Date: % 1,3
er (si nature)
PoA Cover Page 2121100

Jul 08 13 03:31p J Spedding
[phone] p.4
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ANDIOR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. structure ID: fine m Ib PAN
2.
structure ID:
line m = Ib PAN
3.
structure ID:
line m = Ib PAN
4.
structure ID:
line m = Ib PAN
5.
structure ID:
line m = Ib PAN
6.
structure ID:
line m = lb PAN
n.
lines'! + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + e =
1
_ ( Ib PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAYDRAW DOWN
PERIOD.
DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CAN
NOT BE APPLIES DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract ff
P. TIela ;*
y. ump
r. acres
s. remaining
IRR-2 PAN
balance
(lb/acre)
T.0
BALANCE
FOR FIELD
(Ibs.)
column r x s
application
window'
C�b4�
1
11dZ
,J ICIL %.LJI IgUI1 1-1 U✓ J 16-1"11 Iy CMV7 F1ILO\w1I UOIc vl I Imo- L %JV QIFF ;1%.CIIFV1I vIUVII Fl Ill IV uaUc wl Orn1I04JIG Icl U1VI1IV %,i vNa
during 30.day drawn down period
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column 0 = Ib. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121100 2

illll tiril 9ii Slii�ii'I{7 it ii{'r�ii�illEli� 1.�1�17} i'i1�1-'ii1(( {7,ir
IV. FACILITY'S POA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
or Tnt- l oAM to hn Iind 1pnlind (linn n frnm nnntinn II) - 11da I lh nAil
x. Crop'4 remaining PAN halanrm (line v frnm .-rPrtinn 111) = Ih PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = ('J(Q1. Ce lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here
including pump and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd
reduction options, recalculate new PAN based on new information. If new fields are to be
included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these fields to the PAN balance table and
recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to another permitted
facility provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
NARRATIVE:
:1. 12�1 G AM o �. C>/,, ib LAC 1 J4F-n" ( 39(Z-j t{ Fje� UJ 4 L1- COS (17�-c11L-r
A-5 we7"*6)z /V 7 F(49Z-2) cCj^kL) rT1U.,,,i5 Pe?-vnI
r„ A 100 Dwrl =109

Rpr 04 12 09:49a Spedding Farms 3102894008 p.2
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 31 - S 1 3 County:
Facility Name: j - � !) /^I G .
Certified Operator Name: _ _�&F 7 l/%,l C� Operator # AWAz % 9 '7 Rq
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Structure t Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Lagoon Name/Identifier (ID): E / 65
Spillway (Yes or No):
Level (inches):
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures. Five
and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list of the
proposed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop information,
Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to transfer of waste
to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste management plan.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
- if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: il Le��
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached Plan
of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and correct.
Facility Owner[Manager (print) x)
Date: "t
(sign tune)
PoA Cover Page 2121100

npr 04 12 09:49a Spedding Farms 9102894008 p.3
PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
1. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Narnelldentifier (ID): (fjo�A?C: (lg=E I— �A S.L�nZ-
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard ��. f inches
c, line b - line a (inches in red zone) _ /. (L inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design g /0(0 ftz
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e, line c x line d x 7.48 a_g dons _ gallons
12 ft
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design f, days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design
I7 V/rI W
h. actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = ---�.- ft3
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design ft3
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design Jl l ft3
k. (lines h + i +i) x 7.48 x 30 days = r is gallons
line f
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period J
I. current waste analysis dated �� I_ f Ib/1000 gal.
m. (lines e + k) x line I = lb PAN
1000
PaA 130 Day) V21100 1

npr 04 12 09:50a
Spedding Farms
9102894008
P•4
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED.WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ANDIOR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. structure ID: line m = % . �� lb PAN
2. structure ID: line m = lb PAN
3. structure ID: line m = Ib PAN
4. structure ID: line m = lb PAN
5. structure ID: line m = lb PAN
6. structure ID: line m lb PAN
n. lines 1 +2+3+4+5+6 lb PAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAYDRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CAN NOT BE APPLIES DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD_
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining
IRR-2 PAN
balance
(lb/acre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE
FOR FIELD
(Ibs.)
column r x s
U.
application
Window'
7'; .1 0'
P1 ;
N
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available receiving crops
during 30 day drawn down period
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = c �i�IsJlb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121100
2

Rpr 04 12 09:50a
Spedding Farms
9102834008
p.5
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = —H 8 lb. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) rij, • 7 Ib. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = . !�2 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here
including pump and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump S haul and herd
reduction options, recalculate new PAN based on new information. If new fields are to be
included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these fields to the PAN balance table and
recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to another permitted
facility provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
NARRATIVE:
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. A
current waste analysis has been requested..
PoA (30 Day) ti21ro0 3

Mar 29 12 10:10a Spedding Farms 9102894008 p.2
PLAN'. OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: County: _DAL I�_ _
Facility Name:
Certified Operator Name: _.jC� F -� `�C�7 ��i C— Operator # /I WA-
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways, and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure B
Lagoon Name/identifier (ID): 50i.J
Spillway (Yes or No):
Level (inches):
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures. Five
and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
_ Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list of the
proposed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop information.
Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to transfer of waste
to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste management plan.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated. _
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
- if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached Plan
of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and correct.
66: s ' `TrC - 3-7,,7-- 9-�U&q
Phone: C� a� - 40oC -
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date:
PoA Cover Page 2121100

Mar 29 12 10:10a
Spedding Farms
9102094008
p.3
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelldentifier (ID):
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard I �, `� inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) _ _ - -I- inches
d, top of dike surface area according to design _ �r C+ C:�U0 ft
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c x line d x 7.48 al4 Ions = //.2, .gqoL gallons
12 ft3
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design .I ,SCE days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design r /: I ft3
h. actual waste produced = current herd # x line g 1-L-�i ft3
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i +i) x 7.48 x 3030 days =
line f
4_ Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated
m. (lines e + k) x line I
1000
PoA (30 Day) 2121100 1
ft3
o vo ,ft3
` 0gallons
le Ib11000 gal.
6- ?3, 7 Ib PAN

Mar 29 12 10:10a Spedding Farms 9102894008 p.4
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE
11. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. structure ID: LA �jC�C'`,,A4 line m = lb PAN
2. structure ID: line m = lb PAN
3. structure ID: line m = lb PAN
4. structure ID:. line m = lb PAN
5. structure ID: line m = lb PAN
6. structure ID- line rn = lb PAN
n. lines '1+2+3+4+5+6 = 67lbPAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAYDRAW DOWN
PERIOD_ DO NOT LISP FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CAN NOT RE APPLIES DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining
IRR-2 PAN
balance
(lblacre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE
FOR FIELD
(Ibe.)
column r x s
u.
application
window'
}
c
G
�S Gz 3
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available receiving crops
during 30 day drawn down period
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) _ �t ��'� r` lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121100 2

Mar 29 12 10:10a Spedding Farms 3102854006 p.5
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 4 &3, lb. PAN
- " x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) _ !A lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = Ib. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here
including pump and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd
reduction options, recalculate new PAN based on new information. If new fields are to be
included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these fields to the PAN balance table and
recalculate the overall PAN balance. K animal waste is to be hauled to another permitted'
facility provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
NARRATIVE:
Irrigation onto existing spray fields wlil continue as weather and field conditions permit A
current waste analysis has been requested.
PoA (30 Day) 2121100 3

ECEIVED ! DENR ! DV4
_Aq� Pratedinn SediQtl
Nov so 20
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Judy & Jeff Spedding31813
Judy & Jeff Spedding
PO Box 100
Kenansville, NC 28349
910-289-4877
11-20-2009
This plan has been developed by:
Billy W Houston
Duplin Soil & Water Conservation
PO Box 219
Kenansville, NC 28349
[l1MT89 % I
�
;� (.c,.
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
RECD D E C 2 3 2009
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for tht
farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management tf at Vq i0q#ed with this plan.
L1-2.0-0�
tur (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: L� 1�✓ :._ �L) -D!a
Technical Specialist Signature Date
992704 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-20-2009 Cover Page 1

0
rl
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 3,403,944 gals/year by a 3,672
animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
storage ca acities of approximatelX 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
7840
Incorporated
13464
Injected
14828
Irrigated
8522
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
8,522
11885
-3,363
4,796,823
-1,392,879
Year 2
8,522
11414
-2,892
4,592,199
-1,188,255
S 11
Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid waste generated 4,633,200 gals/year by a 1,200
animal Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has
waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
.Broadcast
7150
Incorporated
12279
Injected
13522
Irrigated
7771
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
1 7,771
12009
-4,238
7,159,438
-2,526,238
Year 2
1 7,771
11497
-3,726
6,854,027
-2,220,827
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source,
" Max, Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
992704 Database Version 3.1 . Date Printed: 11-20-2009 Source Page Page I of I

31
Narrative
This WUP is written based on wetted acres provided by RainMan Irrigation.
IRRIGATION PULLS WILL BE PLANTED IN A ROW CROP ROTATION,
992704 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-20-2009 Narrative Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are
also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres .
Leaching
lndex (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
71707
lA
4.30
4.30
NIA
Wo4ngton
Corm Grain
110 bu.
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
71707
tB
4.30
4.30
N/A
Woodington
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
7t707
2A
4.20
4.20
NIA
Woodington
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
71707
2B
4.20
4.20
NIA
Woodington
Corn, Grain
1 t0 bu.
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
71707
3
2.90
2.90
N/A
Woodington
Com, Grain
Ito bu.
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
71707
P1A
122,40
30.60
NIA
Goldsboro
Corn, Grain
130 bu.
Wheat, Grans
65 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
71707
P1B
122.40
30.60
NIA
Woodington
Corn, Grain
110. bu.
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
71707
Pic
122.40
61,20
N/A
Woodington
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
PLAN TOTALS: 387.10 142.30
992704 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 11/20/2009
PCS Page Page 1 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data,

LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
�— 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<= 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available boater holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples
10
are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778),
and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
992704 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 11/20/2009
PCS Page Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Svmbol • means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use the
nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient
uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of
nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the
utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
@
Sod Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(RWA)
Comm.
Fem
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Res,
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied I
(1)s/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
low
gWA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
71707
lA
S7
Woodington
4.30
4.30
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
2/15-6l30
119
0
•19
Irrig.
50
19,97
0.00
85.88
0.00
71707
1 A
S 11
Woodington
4.30
4.30
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
2/15-6130
119
0
•19
brig.
501
29.81
0.00
128.18
0.00
71707
lA
S7
Woodington
4.30
4.30
Wheat, Grain
50 bte_
9/1-4130
96
0
0
Irrig.
0
11.50
Om
49.47
0.00
71707
IA
S11
Woodington
4.30
4.30
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
911-4/30
96
0
0
Irrig.
29
17.1
0.00
73.83
0.00
71707
1B
S7
Woodington
4.30
4.30
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
2/15-6/30
119
0
•19
Irrig
50
19.9
0.00
85.98
0.00
71707
1B
S.11
Woodington
4.30
4.30Corn,Grain
110 bu.
2115-6130
119
0
*19
brig
50
29.81
0.00
128.18
0.00
71707
1B
S7
Woodington
4.30
4.30
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-480
96
0
0
Irrig
1 29
11.50
0.00
49.47
0.00
71707
IB
S11
Woodington
4.30
4.30
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1.4/30
96
0
0
Irrig.
29
17.17
0.00
73.83
0.00
71707
2A
S7
Woodington
4.20
4.20
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
2/15-6/30
119
0
•19
Irrig.
50
t9.97
0.00
83,88
0.00
71707
2A
Sl 1
Woodington
4.20
4.20
Com, Grain
110 bu.
2/15-6130
119
0
*19
Irrig. .
50
29.81
0.00
125.20
0.00
71707
2A
S7
Woodington
4.20
4.20
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
96
0
0
Irrig,
29
11.50
0.00
49.32
0.00
71707
2A
Sit
Woodington
4.20
4.20
Wheat, Grain
50 bu_
9/1-4130
96
Q
0
hrig.
29
17.17
0.00
72.11
0.00
71707
2B
S7
Woodington
4.20
4.20
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
2/13-6/30
119
0
•19
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
83.88
0.00
71707 1
2B
S11
Woodington
4.20
4.20
Corn, Grain
t t0 bu.
2115-6/30
119
0
•19
Irrig.
50:i
29.81
0.00
125.20
0.00
71707
2B
S7
Woodington
4.20
4.20
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
96
0
0
Irrig,
29
11.50
0.00
48.32
0.00
71707
2B
S11
Woo lington
4.20
4.20
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
96
0
0
Irrig,
29
17.1
0.00
72.11
0.00
992704 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed_ 11/20/2009 WUT Page Page 1 of 4

Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract
Field
Source
m
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ebs%A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(tbs/A)
Res.
(IbslA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NufticntA
pplied
(RWA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tana
L000 gals
tons
71707
3
S7
Woodington
2.90
2.90
Corn, Grain
1l0 bu.
2/15-6130
119
0
*19
Irrig.
50
19.9
0.00
57.92
0,00
71707
3
Si 1
Woodington
2.90
2.90
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
2/15-6/30
119
0
*19
Irrig.
50
29.81
0.00
86.45
0.00
71707
3
S7
Woodington
2.90
2.90
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
96
0
0
Irrig
29
11.50
0.00
33,36
0.0
71707
3
S11
Woodington
2.90
2.90
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
911-4/30
96
0
0
Irrig,
29
17.17
0.00
49.79
0.00
7t707
PIA
S7
Goldsboro
t22.40
30.60
Cam, (main
130 bu.
2/t5.6/30
149
0
*19
Irrig,
64
25.56
0.00
782.27
0.00
71707
PIA
Sll
Goldsboro
122.40
30.60
Corn, Grain
130bu.
2/15-6130
148
0
*19
Irrig.
64
38.16
0.00
1,167-56
0.00
71707
PIA
S7
Goldsboro
122.40
30.60
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/1-4130
136
0
0
Irrig.
41
16.30
0.00
498.69
0.00
71707
PIA
Sil
Goldsboro
122.40
30.60
Wheat, Grain
65hu.
911-4/30
136
0
0
Irrig,
41
24.32
0.00
744.32
0.00
71707
P1B
S7
Woodington
122.40
30.60
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
2115-650
i l9
0
*19
Irrig.
50
19-97
0.00
611.14
0.0
71707
PiB
Sll
Woodington
122.40
30.60
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
2115-6/30
1l9
0
*19
Irrig,
50
29.81
0.00
912.16
0.00
71707
PlB
S7
Woodington
122.40
30.60
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
96
0
0
brig.
29
11,50
0.00
352.02
0.00
71707
PIB
S11
Woodington
122.40
30.60
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
96
0
0
Irrig,
29
17-17
0.00
525.40
0.00
71707
PIC
S7
Woodington
122.40
61.20
Corn, Grain
110 ba.
2115-6130
119
0
*19
Irrig.
50
19-97
0.00
1,222.29
0.00
71707
PIC
Stl
Woodington
122.40
61.20
Corn, Grain
110bu.
2/15-6/30
ll9
0
*19
Irrig.
50
29,81
0.00
1,824.31
0.00
71707
PIC
S7
Woodington
122.40
61.20
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-130
96
0
0
Irrig.
29
1L5
0.00
704.04
0.00
71707
PIC
MSIWoodington
122.40
61.20
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
96
0
0
Irrig,
29
17.1
0.00
1,050.80
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
11,956.26
Total Produced, 1000 gprions
8,037.14
Balance, low gallons
-3,919,12
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
992704 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed. 11/20/2009 WUT Page Page 2 of 4

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Feld
Source
m
sea Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
APphc-
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(ftA)
Comm.
FOM
Nutrient
Applied
OWA)
Res.
(OWA)
App6c.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
p*4
(IWA)
Liquid
ManumA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Mantme
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gaVA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
71707
1A
S7
Woodington
4.30
4.30
Wheat, Grain
-50 bu.
9/1-4/30
96
0
0
brig.
0
7.67
0.00
32.98
0.00
71707
IA
Sit
Woodineon
4.30
4.30
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9114/30
96
0
0
Irrig.
19
11.45
0.00
49.22
0.00
71707
lA
S7
Woodington
4.30
4.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
4/1-9/15
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
22.37
0.00
96.19
0.00
7t707
lA
Sit
Woodington
4.30
4.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
4/1-9/15
112
0
0
brig.
56
33.39
0.00
143.56
0.00
71707
1B
S7
Woodington
4.30
4.30
Whea4 Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4130
96
0
0
brig.
19
7,67
0.00
32.98
0.00
71707
1B
Sit
WoWington
4.30
4.30
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
96
0
0
Irrig.
19
11.45
0.00
49.22
0.00
71707
111
S7
Woodington
4,30
4.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
411-9/15 i
112
0
0
Irrig,
56
22.37
0.00
96.19
0.00
71707
1B
Sit
Woodington
4.30
4.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
4/1-9115
112
0
0
Irrig_
56
33,39
0.00
143.56
0.00
71707
2A
57
Woodington
4.20
4.20
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4130
96
0
0
Irrip,
19
7.67
OAO
32.21
0.00
71707
2A
S1I
Woodington
4.20
4.20
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
911-4I30
96
0
0
Irrig.
19
1I.45
0.00
48.08
0.00
71707
2A
S7
Woodington
4.20
4.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
4/1-9/15
112
0
0
brig.
56
22.37
0.00
93.95
0.00
71707
2A
Sit
Woodington
4.20
4.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
411-9115
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
33.39
0.00
140,22
0.00
71707
2B
S7
Woodington
4,20
4.20
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4190
96
0
0
Irrig,
19
7.67
0.00
32,21
0,00
71707
2B
Sit
Woodington
4.20
4.20
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
96
0
0
Irrig.
19
11.45
0.00
48.08
0.00
71707
2B
S7
Woodington
4.20
4.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
4/1-9/15
112
0
0
Irrig,
56
22.37
0.00
93.95
0.00
71707
2B
811
Woodington
4.20
4.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
4/1-9115
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
33.39
0.00
140.22
0.00
71707
3
S7
Woodington
2.90
2.90
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4130
96
0
0
Irrig.
19
7.67
0.00
22.24
0.00
71707
3
Sit
Woodington
2.90
2.90
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/I-4/30
96
0
0
brig.
19
11.45
0.00
33.20
0.00
71707
3
S7
Woodington
2.90
2.90
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
4/1-9/15
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
22.37
0,00
64.87
0,00
71707
3
Sit
Woodington
2.90
2.90
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
4/1-9/15
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
33.39
0.00
96,82
0.00
71707
PIA
S7
Goldsboro
122.40
30,60
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
911-4130
136
0
0
Irrig.
27
10.86
0.00
332.46
0.00
71707
P1A
Sit
Goldsboro
122.40
30.60
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
911-4130
136
0
0
Irrig
2
16.22
0.00
496.21
0.00
992704 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/20/2009 WUi Page Page 3 of 4

Waste utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
B3
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req-d
WA)
Comm.
Feet
Nutrient
Applied
OWA)
lies,
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbdA)
liquid
ManurcA
died
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(rield)
N
N
N
N
1000
gall A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
71707
PIA
S7
Goldsboro
122.40
30.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu,
4/1-9/15
149
0
0
Irrig.
74
29.56
0.00
904.50
0.00
71707
PIA
Sl1
Goldsboro
122.40
30.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9/15
149
0
0
Irrig,
74
44,12
0.00
1,349.99
0.00
71707
P1B
S7
Woodington
122,40
30.60
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/14130
96
1 0
0
Inig.
19
7.6
0.00
234.68
0.00
71707
P1B
Sli
Woodington
122.40
30.60
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
96
0
0
Irrig.
19
11.45
0.00
350.27
0.00
71707
P1B
S7
Woodington
122,40
30.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
4/)-9115
112
0
0
hTig,
56
22.37
0.00
694.48
0.00
71707
PlB
S11
Woodington
122.40
30.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
411-9/15
112
0
0
Irrig
56
33.39
0.00
1,021.62
0.00
71707
PIC
S7
Woodington
122.40
61.2o
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
96
0
0
Irrig,
19
7.67
0.00
469.36
0,00
71707
PIC
S11
Woodington
122.40
61.20
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-450
96
0
0
brig.
19
11.45
0.00
700.54
0.00
71707
PIC
S7
Woodington
122.40
61.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
411-9/15
112
0
0
brig.
56
22.37
0.00
1,368.96
0.00
71707
PIC
S11
Woodington
122,40
61.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
4/1-9/15
112
0
0
irrig,
56
33.39
0.00
2,043,23
0,00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
11,446.23
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
8,037.14
Balance, I000 gallons
-3,409.08
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol s means user entered data.
992704 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/20/2009 WUT Page Page 4 of 4

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge utilization
for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source, the number of
animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for sludge
application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of copper and zinc
so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a
concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PAN Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gallac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
42.85
85.70
128.56
Hay 6 ion R.Y.E.
300
26.32
21.43
42.85
64.28
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
40.17
80.35
120.52
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
46.03
92.07
138.10
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
23.02
46.03
69.05
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
43.16
86.31
129.47
992704 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-20-2009 Sludge Page Page I of

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are sfiown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
71707
IA
Woodington
0.40
1.0
71707
1B
Woodington
0.40
1.0
71707
2A
Woodington
0.40
1.0
71707
2B
Woodington
0.40
1.0
71707
3
Woodington
0.40
1.0
71707
PIA
Goldsboro
0.50
1.0
71707
P1B
Woodington
0.40
1.0
71707
PIC
Woodington
0.40
1.0
992704 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 11/20/2009 IAF Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available at
the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days minus
the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the
date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is
equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage capacity of
the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that the plan calls
for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated
volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates
that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage
capacity.
Available Waste Stora a Cat)a6itv
Source Name
Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
911
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
.1
28
l
2
71
1
3
111'
1
4
152
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
149
1
8
118
1
9
123
1
10
127
1
11
132
1
12
180
2
1
180
2
2
180
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
180
2
6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
to
149
2
11
119
2
12
88
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
992704 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-20-2009 Capacity Page Page 1 of 2

Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name Swine Feeder -Finish La oon Li uid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date 9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
28
1
2
65
1
.3
99
1
4
134
1
5
168
1
6
180
1
7
149
1
8
118
1
9
120
1
10
121
1
11
123
1
12
180
2
1
180
2
2
180
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
180
2
6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
149
2
11
119
2
i2
88
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
992704 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-20-2009 Capacity Page Page 2 of 2

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
992704 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/20/2009 Specification Page 1

S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that
25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior'converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
992704 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/20/2009 Specification Paae 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
992704 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/20/2009 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): IA, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3, PIB. P I C
Corn 1: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant populations
should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when planting no -till.
Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at planting. When
planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young plants. An accepted
practice is to apply 20-301bs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a starter and one-half the
remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 3040 days after emergence. The
total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the fertilizer program, the
recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples
can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely
management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): PIA
Corn 1: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees Fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant populations
should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when planting no -till.
Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at planting. When
planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young plants. An accepted
practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbslacre phosphorus banded as.a starter and one-half the
remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 3040 days after emergence. The
total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the fertilizer program, the
recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples
can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely
management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
992704 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed; 11-20-2009 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): IA, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3, PIB, P I C
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash
recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The remaining N should be applied during the
months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases,
insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): PIA
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20 November 25, Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash
recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The remaining N should be applied during the
months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases,
insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note app tics to field(s): IA, IB, 2A, 2B, 3, PIB, P I C
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, low -leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate plant
populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 24
seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10
seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth
should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the
soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the .Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally
grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at
planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential
for profitable double crop soybean production.
992704 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-20-2009 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): PIA.
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, low -leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate plant
populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 24
seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10
seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth
should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the
soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally
grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-301bs/acre N are sometimes made at
planting to promote_ early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential
for profitable double crop soybean production.
992704 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-20-2009 Crop Note Page Page 3 of 3

Michael F. Easley, Governor
O�OF W A r�RQG
o 15� -c
Judy Spedding
Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
PO Box 100
Kenansville, NC 28349-0100
Dear Judy Spedding:
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 1, 2007 RECEIVED
JUN 2 6 2007
BY:
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310813
Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
Animal Waste Management System
Duplin County
In accordance with your application received on 20-Feb-07, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Judy Spedding, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296, located in Duplin County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 3672 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 1200
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows,
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition III.19 does not apply. ,
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP, and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay
careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwatemualit .(.orx Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal OpportunitylAHirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
Np"` Carolina
Naturally
Raleigh. NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and. ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property. -
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0111(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration. -
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection staff may be reached at 910-395-3900. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at (919) 733-
3221.
Sincerely,
10,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County Health Department
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS310813

o�cjF W A
r
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary -
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resourecs
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 3, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL �, GIvJ-1f
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED ZQ��
Judy Spedding
Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
PO Box 100
Kenansville NC 28349
Subject: Notification for Phosphorus Loss Assessment
Jeff & Judy Spedding'- Grower #296
J-b'^lp✓ Permit Number NCA231813
-r Facility 31-813 .
Duplin County
Dear Judy Spedding,
.There is a condition in your recently issued Animal Waste Management General NPDES Permit.
addressing phosphorous loss standards. The permit condition quoted below states that if the state or
federal government establishes phosphorus loss standards your facility must conduct an evaluation within
180 days.' The Federal Natural Resources Conservation Service has now established this standard. A
computer -based program was developed to determine how much phosphorus was being lost from
different fields. Instructions on how to comply with this requirement are provided below.
Y
In accordance with your NPDES Permit Number NCA231813 Condition 1.6, your facility must now
conduct a Phosphorus Loss Assessment. Condition I.6 states:
"If prior to the expiration date of this permit either the state or federal government establishes
Phosphorus loss standards that are applicable to land application activities at a facility operating
under this permit, the Permittee must conduct an evaluation of the facility and its CAWMP under
the requirements of the Phosphorus loss standards to determine the facility's ability to comply
with the standards. This evaluation must be documented on forms supplied or approved by the
Division and must be submitted to the Division. This evaluation must be completed by existing
facilities within six (6) months of receiving notification from the Division.
Once Phosphorus loss standards are established by the state or federal government that are
applicable to facilities applying to operate under this permit, no Certificate of Coverage will be
issued to any new or expanding facility to operate under this permit until the applicant
demonstrates that the new or expanding facility can comply with these standards."
The method of evaluation is the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) developed by NC State
University and the Natural Resources Conservation Service. PLAT addresses four potential loss.
pathways: leaching, erosion, runoff and direct movement of waste over the surface. Each field must be
individually evaluated and rated as either low, mcdium, high or very high.according to its Phosphorus
One Carolina
Mundy
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636' Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone] .
Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recydedl10% Post Consumer Paper

Judy Spedding
Page 2
January 3, 2006
loss potential. The ratings for your farm must be reported to DWQ using the attached certification form.
The PLAT forms must be kept as records on your farm for future reference.
From the date of receipt of this letter, a period of 180 days is provided to perform PLAT and return the
certification form to DWQ. Only a technical specialist who has received specific training may perform
PLAT. You are encouraged to contact a technical specialist now to run PLAT on your farm. Your local
Soil and Wdter Conservation District may be able to provide assistance. This information on the attached
form(s) must be submitted within 180 days of receipt of this letter to:
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
NPDES permitted farms will need to have implemented a nutrient management plan which addresses
phosphorus loss before the next permit cycle beginning July, 2007. If you have any fields with a high or
very high rating, then your waste utilization plan will require modifications. The purpose of performing
PLAT this early is to allow adequate time for making waste plan modifications where necessary. With
the next permit, continued application of waste will not be allowed on fields with a very high rating. For
fields rated high, only the amount of phosphorus projected to be removed by the harvested crop. For low
and medium ratings, phosphorus will not be the limiting factor. Once the PLAT evaluation is completed
on your farm, you will know if you have fields that need further work. You are encouraged to begin
developing and implementing a strategy to deal with any issues as soon as passible.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statue or permitting requirement.
--If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] or •--
the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Paul Sherman
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File 31-813

,7
ANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number A 91County. 1 U)PQ,,,.r T� Year 200 F'
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit)!,, F Jt�►!_5A '1�,y(� - 6 1Z d�l(o
Operator in Charge for this Facility I/Q6r- Certification 4
Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year
YES NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part II and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste
was generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
Part;: Facility Information:
1. Total number of application Fields ❑ or Pulls please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): 11cq Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
15 7- {R-
2. Total number of Fields ❑ or Pulls K&lele check the appropriate box) on which land application
occurred during the year: 47 Total Acres on which waste was applied /a3_, %
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
/`5YZ 0-
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be Iand applied annually by the CAWMP and
the permit: oN %/ % a
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken
off site during the year - 15— tons ❑ or gallons El(please check the appropriate box)
6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
cSGlnrS : / fir .__-- . /N/S t�lG�1C c3462 CI r7W . tS AN ISMONTif A veaA"
7. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year:
Largest COWS: ��� _ _ /�//�11�5�II�16 P &S : &3 k5-
Smallest .5Q_ w�S ' _U 94 Jc«rl�rh�� Pl CAS . d?�s
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals
at the facility, is the annual average numbers)
S. Facility's Integrator if applicable: Mo RP &6j,�q} LL. C.
Part II: Facility Status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during res ❑ No
the past calendar year.
AFACF 3-14-03 1 RA d 2004
W;;l,CFi QUALITY
i4fO"DJschar Comb a,,,. ,

2. The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from ❑ Yes 2'1io
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year. '3r= ATTAOICFD J OOPT MTe9- 3- 3--03
3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past 2- s ❑ No
calendar year.
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during ❑ Yes 2' o
the past calendar year. A-TpPC#kn`� -t. g �r� y-!(o-G3 ? cl (3-03
5. There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility. greater than the
❑ Yes
levels specified in this facilitt'ssCCAW IP during the past calendar year.
fl'7 tr�D 4-0--'rrea- t 6t-a�� oaf
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year.
0 Yes ❑ No
7. -Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon
❑ Ye ❑ No
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume
RA
for which the lagoon was designed. A 6-4.uDGE 9W-V Y wi" Be PdSRFQ4%e;,b
8. A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification.
�
❑ Yes E'ITo
S7
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the
9-Tes ❑ No
past calendar year.
10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year?
des ❑ No
1 I. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's
2-'Ves ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during
❑ Yes fo
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality. $cae— Q jcs577o&&s --W a, q 4�6-
13. Crops as specified in the CAWIVIP were maintained during the past calendar year on all
❑'Yes ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were
�
2-` es ❑ No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting Use information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
),*,1Cr- D
id Title (tvve or i
2-26-014
Date
z • Z�5 d
Date
AFACF 3-14-03 2

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
r-
} Date of Visit: Time:
Facility Number r
Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
[3 Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operate r Above Threshold:
Farm Name: e c [� li 11f �P,—T' li County:
Owner Name: _ U! ���'1} f"C" Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: �-.- _ J'Q, Lam' „ Integrator: _yI
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
EJ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �� �� �" Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine CapaCItV Population Poultry Caloacitv Population Cattle CRPBCItV POIDUIMIOR
❑ Wean to Feeder I JE1 La er ❑ Dai
Feeder to Finish ❑ Non-Laer ❑ Non -Dairy
El Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder Other
Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons %t I 1L._1 Subsurface Drains PresentJ1U_Lagoon Area 1LJ Spray Field Area .I
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
r
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the Stale other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I �St✓ructure 2 Structure 3 Stnicture 4 Structure 5
Idenlircr: t';
Freeboard (inches): Z & _/ q
05/01/Dl
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes )?I No
❑ Yes [Z No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes VNo
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection 0�
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markets with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Reguired
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[] No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ )ArUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, Geeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
ONo
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
VNo
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit
`...t�H.'raiy� -�vE!' a:. .r�aav ,.na:•'?- r.- arch r "�.4�+�,7.-.�' �3�:ex++��- ti `i.�..'ra'�.'4�s-�. .}��'lt, as-. �:rh�Ydire�+..:��� * � i,3`:
Comments (refer to questionEzp)aintanylYFS answers sndldrateyeconmeudations br.anyother co mentFN�§.
Use tlrawiigs of facility to better in explasituations °(use additional pages as'necetisary)(� Field Copy El final Notes
3a ! m s a m rp
}, ri a r 31ra s i a ri+ _
�`et.'C.
I 1
F to r•r ri 6 kA 0 Q
CC Ll k D u� � E a 51� (� ,�� � 1.ItT�0'kd) .D� � &'z 1' FCS
y,,, -
Reviewer/inspector Name I-'1
=Y. 3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection �
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
[:]No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
❑ No
28,
is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
❑ No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
Or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
�� F�Cfc
���'�'• t�lU i - f. �� Dr ,' - Tt4
a0�1
R C); r.
Ft< P 1,s1 rJ -1 tJ T
fr)f Nt^
rt _ LJh p 1Q u r
'
VF:
a a-=
RO- EL
l
O5103101

Jeff' and Judy Spedding
Post Office Box 100
Kenansville, North Carolina 28349-0100
May 13, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEiPTREOUESTED
NC Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington NC 28405
Subject: Response to NOV
Jeff and Judy Spedding— Grower #296
Facility Number: 31-813
Duplin County
Dear Sir or Madam:
This letter is in response to the Notice of Violation for inadequate freeboard and your request for
information.
Our freeboard levels became low due to several factors. Renovations to some of the cropping systems in
place were required this past fall and this delayed pumping after the fall harvest. In addition to this, the
unseasonably cold weather that came on early and extended throughout the winter months made the fescue
and orchardgrass crops appear to go into a mild dormancy state. We felt it unwise to apply effluent during
this time. This, coupled with the excessive rainfall during the springtime, led to inadequate freeboard.
To correct the situation, we purchased additional irrigation equipment including a new reel and new
pumping unit. Also additional risers were installed for both of the spray field systems to increase the acres
pumped on. With these additions and the dry weather the lagoons were brought into compliance almost
immediately. Our current freeboard levels are 29 at the finisher lagoon and 28 at the sow lagoon.
We feel with two lagoons on our facility, the additional irrigation equipment will be a huge benefit to avoid
further freeboard violations and'keep them in compliance. We are also researching water conservation
methods that will reduce the volume of water entering the lagoons such as hanging water nipples at the
finishers.
Enclosed you will find freeboard levels, spraying records and rainfall records for the past 12 months to
date. Also enclosed are the cropping system and PAN specified in the CAWMP.
We hope the above will supply you with adequate information but please do not hesitate to contact us if
there are any questions.
Sincerely,
Jeff and Judy Spedding

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Ouality
April 16, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Judy Spedding
PO Box 100
Kenansville NC 28349
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Request for"Information
Inadequate Freeboard
Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
#31-813
Duplin County
Dear Sir or Madam:
On April 14, 2003, a representative of your animal operation informed the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) that there was inadequate freeboard in the lagoon(s) serving this facility.
This lack of adequate freeboard is in non-compliance with the Certificate of Coverage
issued to this facility on June 25, 1997. In addition to this Notice of Violation (NOV), this non-
compliance is subject to an appropriate enforcement action by DWQ. This action can consist of
one or more of the following: a civil or criminal enforcement action; an injunction; and/or a
requirement to apply for coverage under an individual permit. The action chosen will be based
on complete evaluation of all factors that resulted in the inadequate freeboard; the actions taken
to restore the needed freeboard; and the actions being proposed to prevent the problem from
reoccurring.
To assist us in our review, please provide the Wilmington Regional Office with an
evaluation of the reasons for the freeboard violation(s) and a strategy to prevent future freeboard
violation(s). This evaluation and strategy must include but is not limited to the following:
Current Freeboard level(s)
Freeboard level records in the lagoon(s) for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
Spraying records for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
Customer Service. Mailing Address. Telephone [phone]
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal OpportunityIAffirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
ht1pJ/h2o.enr state.nc. us
N1FJ
E NR
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

Inadequate Freeboard
Page 2
Rainfall records for the past 12 months for this site up to the date of submittal (if
available)
Cropping system and PAN specified in the CAWMP. If the cropping system was not in
compliance with the facility's CAWMP, provide details of the cropping system in place
for the past 12 months.
A summary of actions taken to restore the needed freeboard in the lagoon(s) including but
not limited to removal of animals from the site, delay of restocking of animals, pumping
and hauling waste to another site (specify site), securing additional irrigation equipment,
and securing additional spray sites.
A description of water conservation measures in use at the facility and the date(s)
installed.
If the lagoon level(s) are still in violation of the facility's CAWMP and Permit, provide
an updated Plan of Action as to how the facility will return to compliance.
Provide a detailed description of the actions taken or proposed to be taken to insure that
there are no further freeboard violations at this facility.
This information must be received by the Wilmington Regional Office at the following
address no later than 10 days following receipt of this letter.
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 29405-2845
Once this information is received and evaluated by the DWQ staff, a determination will
be made as to the appropriate compliance/enforcement actions to be taken. Each case will be
evaluated on its own merit. The efforts by the owner/producer to notify DWQ of the problem,
efforts made to resolve the problem once identified, and efforts proposed to prevent future
problems will be positive factors in this determination.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you either the responsibility or
liability for this non-compliance or future cases of non-compliance. If you have any questions
regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact our Wilmington Regional Office Staff at.
[phone].
Sincerely,
lan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Central Files

Jeff & Judy Spedding
Permit No: NCA 231813
Re: Animal Facility Annual Certification Form
Part II Question 5
This facility keeps its pumping records on a non calendar year basis as required by the
NC Division of Water Quality, see attached report dated 9/28/98. The records were
originally kept on a calendar year basis until it was required of us to change to a non -
calendar reporting cycle.
There was no over application of Pan to any fields or crops greater than specified by this
facilities CAWMP for the reporting cycle that we have been required to maintain.
However, when the Pan applied is recalculated for the calendar year it gives a false
impression that there was over application of PAN for specific fields. At this time we
would like to request that we be able to return to a calendar year reporting cycle without
consequence of perceived over application of Pan so that we may comply better with this
annual certification.
f
a-02 S- 041
Owner
LAW
Judy Sped ing
• it

zu"d #r ��ew aS M,� ;
Division of Soil and Water Conservation Other Agency�
m © Division of Water Quality
:qe,W.,xa.�.a�"'c����;+,��F•.:,'!�°'z'� re�b°'.r.:�,. �s.3'-';r -�^,.:•.;,::�+�s-�.�kd;��rF�zr �'2�.�;..,a...z �3ad '�'�..
i Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number ; ( Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered B Certified ❑ Applied for Permit Q Pertnitted ❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: „•-,;,-,•
FarmName: ............. .................... ......................................... Countv: .........a; ........... ........... ....................... .......................
OwnerName:.......... ..................... ............. : }..................................... Phone No:...................................................................................
........ ............... Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ................................................... Facility Contact: ................:��:...
MailingAddress: .............. .4.`...... :i .�..........ar.................................................................... ......1 ...............ti::.!.:......::.?i..................................... ......`.... .........
OnsiteRepresentative: .............:S�_ f -AS Integrator •...... .., ..............................................................
Certified Operator:............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number.....................
Location of Farm:
Mc
C
Latitude =• 0' =11 Longitude =* =` =«
<. ex,£# DestgnCurrentY Design t Current h: 4 "? Design Current
K' '�l�Vn ae9f . 3+� '3 S y, t -.'' 3� f. i. - .: �h:V:i yid - a 3)b
R't eF{':. •
�S.E{
ea0ac,ty,E,Populahon; .Cattle.. `; ,{ Capacity„Poptlahon
a. ..::�°Capactty,;,Popuiatton
.Poultry;,°` , ,
µ
4❑Layer ; ❑ Dairy
['Feeder to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Gilts
❑
❑ Boars
eneral
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [9 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? El Yes 0 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes 0 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? _ 1..,1 11,
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if yes, notify DWQ) El Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes El No
'. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? El Yes ® No
-5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require © Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 'S No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 0 Yes ❑;No
eneral
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [9 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? El Yes 0 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes 0 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? _ 1..,1 11,
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if yes, notify DWQ) El Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes El No
'. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? El Yes ® No
-5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require © Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 'S No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 0 Yes ❑;No

r,
Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ® No
Structures (LaeoonsAoldine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.I
7. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure-3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
r�
Identifier: S24 ............ ...............J::ti........... .................................... ................................... ...............................
Freeboard(ft): .............. '. 4.............. ............... 7................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....... I..............................
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes EJ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes ©'No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes © No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .............!.s.t..tr:l;....................................................................................... ••.......".............•••-".....-•-.................................................................................
16, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AVVW)? ❑ Yes 53 No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
d No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
®]Yes
❑ No
19,
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Q'No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑'No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
0 No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Eacilities Only.
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
® Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
h Yes
❑ No
[3•No. vio'latioins'or. deficient de's4eire'noted-during' this:visit:- You.will ikei ive-nti further-:
- correspQridence about •this:visit:": ; -; - :..� " , ... • � . ; ... • .:. � . - ... � .. .:. .: _ :. • .: � ..: _ : .:..:. .
K•
-
Reviewer/Inspector Name

R I�1 � ANEM AL FACILITY ANNUAL CER �IFICATION FORM
LMq g 2 2004
e ficate of Co erage or Permit Number ,6L< � Zj $l 3 _ County ��A�,l� Year 20025
; shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit).SE,FF E Jcjj>r�w`62�1c.2,p3rl�
Operator in Charge for this Facility Certification #
Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year
�� YES I NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part II and proceed to the certification.. Also, if animal wast
was generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
Part I : Facili Information:
1. Total number of application Fields 0 or Pulls fd'(please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Anima
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): _ _ Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP. .
2. Total number of Fields ❑ or Pulls aease check the appropriate box) on which land application
occurred during the year: 47 Total Acres on which waste was applied •_ IAQ %
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and
the permit: _ _��%/ % Od
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken
off site during the year tons ❑ or gallons ❑ (please check the appropriate box'
6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
jf�O►�.S • • /Ak5- F1N/SNV4P1.a��fpLS AWlaGG3vex
7. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year:
Largest COWS:,C'/140f1T/tl6 _10I &S ' L --
Smallest .50 WS _ T �'/�5fls��^c � PI GS• : d q-' 'J
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals
at the facility is the annual average numbers)
8. FaciIity's Integrator if applicable: All AON W L.-L-C=. _
Part II: Facility Status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY'THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during is3'Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
AFACF 3-14-03

2. The facility was operated ire such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from ❑ Yes 2 4-o
the facility (including'die houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year. AMcVc50 PObP-T D*JM) 3- 3-03
I There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past Zs ❑ No
calendar year. 4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility du.-ing [I2 Yes - -
the past calendar year. 5effe--- ATg-kksb ZSTMV.s 1j'T� ti-/&-03 0 (s 0-03
5. There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the ❑ Yes I�
levels specified in this facility's CAWW during the past calendar year. y[
.3E �gsTrA�t D t. 'trcrZ � at- orl Q Yes ❑ No
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past cale dar year.
7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon
❑ Ye ❑ No
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to Iess than the volume
�f}
for which the lagoon was designed. A SI-uD[Z &.P-V Y c Lj- BE PCIZPt"eab
L3Y A I-gy a4
8. A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification.
❑ Yes 2IToo
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the
''Yes ❑ No
past calendar year.
10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year?
des ❑ No
11. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's
2'Ves ❑ No
" permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during
❑ Yes D- o
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality. �-t=- Ck)azTxv-Ls tw
13. Crops as specified in the CAWW were maintained during the past calendar year on all
2--Y'es ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWW for this facility were
2- es ❑ No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
rermiuee Name ana i me (type or vent)
Date
2 - Z56 d�
Date
AFACF 3-14-03 2

Type of Visit
. Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine
0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification
0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number t, Date of Visit: Time: ! .%
r
of Operational
Below Threshold
p Permitted
O Certified
13 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operateld!or Above Threshold:
I Farm Name:
([1 �t�? l`' ,� x County
.k i { l�L
Owner Name:
_ �f-
- f ; _ `[a r'' Phone No:
— -- _--
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsitc Representative:
4;�� j��•�^
Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
[�] Swine ❑ Poultry
❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude
0` Du Longitude
Design Current
Design Current .Design Current
Swine
Capacity Po D ulation Poultry
Ca aci .—Po ulation -----Cattle � Ca aci —Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dai
l Feeder to Finish
12, ❑ Non -Layer
L. I Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
n(J ❑Other
'15Farrow o Finish
Total Design Capacity ,
PGilts
-1 Boars
Total.SSLW ,
Number of Lagoons ' - ❑ Subsurface Drains Present_ ❑.Lagoon Area IE3
'Holding Ponids 1 Solid Traps'`.. ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Spray Field Area
Discharges Rc Stream, Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part ofthe operation?
d Yes
❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field 0 Other
Y'
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
j No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
[]'No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min"
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Wastg Collection -& Treatme�tt
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes
�No
Structure I Strpcturc 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifiert':�
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
Continued

Facility Number: I — f 5 13
Date of Inspection t.
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ hydraulic Overload _
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Anima( Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
M. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
k] No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
;gNo
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to,qumdbn.#) E htfn any Y1H.S answers and/or any recok�mentlations or any othericotnments R �t r :
T
Useldrater wfng§ of facillty to better plaln situaiians (use additlonal pages as necessary) t �, (0 Field Copy ❑
Final Notes
a . Ot _
T
kF
7C-rE; �1 5�_ larJ� e U 6FCf u"E Cj T
U (� � "'- � � h, 1� � �Z � � i� � � �� � - C••-' � V f'�
. 1 F' .i-' {,�f.J••'e
C- r- �� ...' C' C %A (C Q F AA
�
111 ��URR1 L'OkEt4 1 �iA��t�LJL,P r$0jJ) ���r� 1-�t�L+`+Yt`.1Pec, FfQof�
�ttS� Lt� c�=✓�o �5-rC_ ���r�t� •S� i1�CtQ �t,-�'Hr
ReviewerlInspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: , Date: G'
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: rjj� — f "t; Date of Inspection �1 n
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes [:J No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ h,o
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? [:1 Yes [] No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/or.Drswings:,;` ~
��
�-c 1
L-c:-actUPC,)
0 Q F- pltf
FLOW
f
V �. (� i i%�r� i~1 �,'rJ M r— f r{
05103101

i
Jeff and Judy Spedding
Post Office Box 100
Kenansville, North Carolina 28349-0100
May 13, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
NC Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington NC 28405
Subject: Response to NOV
Jeff and Judy Spedding -- Grower #296
Facility Number: 31-813
Duplin County
Dear Sir or Madam:
This letter is in response to the Notice of Violation for inadequate freeboard and your request for
information.
Our freeboard levels became low due to several factors. Renovations to some of the cropping systems in
place were required this past fall and this delayed pumping after the fall harvest. In addition to this, the
unseasonably cold weather that came on early and extended throughout the winter months made the fescue
and orchardgrass crops appear to go into a mild dormancy state. We felt it unwise to apply effluent during
this time. This, coupled with the excessive rainfall during the springtime, led to inadequate freeboard.
To correct the situation, we purchased additional irrigation equipment including a new reel and new
pumping unit. Also additional risers were installed for both of the spray field systems to increase`the'acres
pumped on. With these additions and the dry weather the lagoons were brought into compliance almost
immediately. Our current freeboard levels are 29 at the finisher lagoon and 28 at the sow lagoon.
We feel with two lagoons on our facility, the additional irrigation equipment will be a huge benefit to avoid
further freeboard violations and keep them in compliance. We are also researching water conservation
methods that will reduce the volume of water entering the lagoons such as hanging water nipples at the
finishers.
Enclosed you will find freeboard levels, spraying records and rainfall records for the past 12 months to
date. Also enclosed are the cropping system and PAN specified in the CAWMP.
We hope the above will supply you with adequate information but please do not hesitate to contact us if
there are any questions.
Sincerely,
Jeff and Judy Spedding

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 16, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Judy Spedding
PO Box 100
Kenansville NC 28349
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Request for'lnfbrmation
Inadequate Freeboard
Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
#31-813
Duplin County
Dear Sir or Madam:
On April 14, 2003, a representative of your animal operation informed the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) that there was inadequate freeboard in the lagoon(s) serving this facility -
This lack of adequate freeboard is in non-compliance with the Certificate of Coverage
issued to this facility on June 25, 1997. In addition to this Notice of Violation (NOV), this non-
compliance is subject to an appropriate enforcement action by DWQ. This action can consist of
one or more of the- following: a civil or criminal enforcement action; an injunction; and/or a
requirement to apply for coverage under an individual permit. The action chosen will be based
on complete evaluation of all factors that resulted in the inadequate freeboard; the actions taken
to restore the needed freeboard; and the actions being proposed to prevent the problem from
reoccurring.
To assist us in our review, please provide the Wilmington Regional Office with an
evaluation of the reasons for the freeboard violation(s) and a strategy to prevent future freeboard
violation(s). This evaluation and strategy must include but is not limited to the following:
Current Freeboard level(s)
Freeboard level records in the lagoon(s) for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
Spraying records for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
NCDENR
Customer Service: Malting Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1.877.623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury 5t.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52.01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50 % recycled / 10 % post -consumer paper
http✓/h2o. enrstate.nc. us

Inadequate Freeboard '
Page 2
Rainfall records for the past 12 months for this site up to the date of submittal (if
available)
Cropping system and PAN specified in the CAWMP. If the cropping system was not in
compliance with the facility's CAWMP, provide details of the cropping system in place
for the past 12 months.
A summary of actions taken to restore the needed freeboard in the lagoon(s) including but
not limited to removal of animals from the site, delay of restocking of animals, pumping
and hauling waste to another site (specify site), securing additional irrigation equipment,
and securing additional spray sites.
A description of water conservation measures in use at the facility and the date(s)
installed.
If the lagoon level(s) are still in violation of the facility's CAWMP and Permit, provide
an updated Plan of Action as to how the facility will return to compliance.
Provide a detailed description of the actions taken or proposed to be taken to insure that
there are no further freeboard violations at this facility.
This information must be received by the Wilmington Regional Office at the following
address no later than 10 days following receipt of this letter.
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-2845
Once this information is received and evaluated by the DWQ staff, a determination will
be made as to the appropriate compliance/enforcement actions to be taken. Each case will be
evaluated on its own merit. The efforts by the owner/producer to notify DWQ of the problem,
efforts made to resolve the problem once identified, and efforts proposed to prevent future
problems will be positive factors in this determination.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you either the responsibility or
liability for this non-compliance or future cases of non-compliance. If you have any questions
regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact our Wilmington Regional Office Staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Ian W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Central Files

Jeff & Judy Spedding
Permit No: NCA 231813
Re: Animal Facility Annual Certification Form
Part 11 Question 5
This facility keeps its pumping records on a non calendar year basis as required by the
NC Division of Water Quality, see attached report dated 9/28/98. The records were
originally kept on a calendar year basis until it was required of us to change to a non -
calendar reporting cycle.
There was no over application of Pan to any fields or crops greater than specified by this
facilities CAWMP for the reporting cycle that we have been required to maintain.
However, when the Pan applied is recalculated for the calendar year it gives a false
impression that there was over application of PAN for specific fields. At this time we
would like to request that we be able to return to a calendar year reporting cycle without
consequence of perceived'over application of Pan so that we may comply better with this
annual certification.
Judy Sp­edding
,AaB=a�G

tX..;.:Yd�S �:�n�"i'3a....:::<wew"..:^>w^a-:ir,xe..we...'r::...fi...,w."v`..�.l,Ti.w,....>b'
'f..�,�.-..w`x �s `Fa .. �{T•t-°� -r„YpE
❑ Dtviston of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency %2,
Division of Water Quality
7 Routine Q Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q
Facility Number
© Registered [f Certified [3 Applied for Permit ElPermitted
Ilow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspeclion � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
FarmName:.............:. �:.:_.�...... �....:: t ...`.� ��.)� :.:................................................. County:......?: i:................ _........................... .......................
OwnerName: ......................................... ..................... ....... ............................I....... Phone No:....... L., ...........................................................................
FacilityContact: ........................ ......... ..................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:.......: :..11......: ........... J. .................................................................... ......�...............::>:.. � ).....::��.................................... ...'. °y.'.:
Onsite Representative:. i:. ........... _�:::.i:...::. �.............................................. Integrator: .......�.::..:.I...........................................................
-s'
Certified Operator: ................. -............................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
General
i. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? dr yes, notifv DWQ)
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
'. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes El No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes El No
[i Yes [] No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes El No
❑ Yes [.].No
it

Spedding Farms sprayfields
Subject: Spedding Farms sprayfields
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:05:56 -0600
From: Tim Hall <[e-mail]>
To: Jeff Spedding <[e-mail]>, Chester Cobb <[e-mail]>
Recommendations attached - signed copy is in the mail. TSH
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Name: Spedding let l.doc
FISpedding let 1.doc Type: WINWORD File (applicationlmsword)
Encoding: base64
Download Status: Not downloaded with message
1 of 1 11/18/2003 4:01 PM

P.O. Box 444
Richlands, NC 28574
Mr. Jeff Spedding
P.O. Box 100
Kenansville, NC 28349
November 17, 2003
Dear Mr. Spedding,
On Friday, November 14, we met at your farm to discuss renovation of hay stands on the sprayfields.
Among the issues involved was the quantity of weed and annual grass residue present and its possible
effects on successful re-establishment of tall fescue and orchardgrass. My feeling is that the density of
residue would cause two problems if not removed. First, it would prevent consistent penetration of the
soil by the no -till drill you have available, resulting in poor seed -soil contact in the thicker areas, perhaps
leading to drill adjustment which would place the seed too deep in the soil in areas where the thatch is
less dense. Second, the mulch effect of the residue would inhibit the emergence of germinating seed
and the development of a dense stand.
The options for managing the residue include moldboard plowing to bury the material, mowing and
baling the material and removing from the field, or burning the material. In my opinion, burning the
residue either after windrowing or in place is the preferred option. The heavy tillage required to bury the
residue would take a substantial amount of time to perform, and would push the already late planting
further into the winter. Disturbing an area of soil this size in the cool season may also lead to soil
erosion if we experience more of the heavy rainfall that we have had for the last twelve months.
Removing the material in round bales poses the problem of disposing of the material, which, due to its
composition and deteriorated condition, would be of no value as hay and would merely pose a liability
to the farm.
Burning i s a practice we d o not often recommend, except for disease a nd insect c ontrol in warm -
season grasses. However it is a useful and ocassionally necessary practice when field residue cannot
be managed in other ways. In this case, I feel that the trade-off for reducing erosion and maintaining
soil structure is both environmentally and economically prudent.
You should obtain the necessary burning permit, disk a fire break around the fields, and try to bum on a
windless day, if possible. It may be a good idea to ask the local fire department to have a truck on
standby in case you lose control of the fire. Another option which may enhance fire safety is to mow
and windrow the material before burning, although I think a cleaner burn would be obtained with the
material left in place. Also, please take care not to allow smoke to become a driving hazard on 140.
Given that it is already a month past our latest recommended planting date for tall fescue and
orchardgrass, and that you are using no -till, I would increase seeding rates to 25 lb per acre for fescue
and 20 lb per acre for orchardgrass. The target seeding depth is 0.5 inch. I will be glad to assist with
drill calibration and adjustment if needed. I would apply up to 30 lb per acre PAN this fall, and resume
regular application in compliance with your W UP in February.
I also think it would be a good idea to diversify the species you have on your sprayfields. l would
suggest trying a few acres of Tifton 85 bermudagrass, which can be sprigged as dormant material in
mid -February to mid -March, or after early spring growth has emerged and been clipped off, in late -April
to early -June. Reliance on only cool -season grasses may be contributing to the stand loss you
experienced. Although small amounts of PAN are allowed on these grasses during the summer
months, such applications may contribute to the onset of Rhizoctonia (brown patch) and other

0 Page 2 November 18, 2003
diseases. In our often wet and always humid summer conditions, disease inoculum is always present
beneath the canopy, and lush growth which occurs when plant tissue nitrogen is elevated, renders the
grass more susceptible to the onset of foliar fungal disease.
The best defense against outbreaks of brown patch is to avoid PAN application during hot, moist
weather conditions, and to harvest hay frequently enough to maintain a canopy which allows some air
movement and drying during the day. These diseases are normally worse in fescue due to the canopy
density; orchardgrass is normally a clumpy grass and does not usually develop severe foliar disease,
although it will be a short-lived crop in this part of the state. Both grasses should be cut to a stubble
height of about three to four inches. To avoid high levels of endophyte toxin in fescue, harvest at early
boot stage, well prior to seedhead emergence.
You should proceed with spraying the Butyrac for broadleaf weeds in the alfalfa field as soon as
possible in order to salvage that stand, and proceed with planting the grasses soon as well. Please feel
free to call anytime I can be of assistance.
Sincerely yours,
Tim S. Hall
Regional Agronomist
NCDA&CS

�C W A 749 Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
.� Division of Water Quality
August 11, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7003 0500 0000 8804 3648
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Judy Spedding
PO Sox 100
Kenansville, NC 28349
Subject: Inadequate Freeboard
No Further Action
Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
Facility # 31-813
Duplin County
Dear Judy Spedding:
Thank you for your recent submittal of the information requested in our letter dated April 15,
2003. The Wilmington Regional Office has determined that no further enforcement actions will
be taken by the Division for the inadequate freeboard.
However, upon review and consideration of the information submitted, the Wilmington Regional
Office has determined that an NOV is appropriate due to unsatisfactory operation and
maintenance of the waste treatment system.
In the future, please continue to evaluate ways to maintain freeboard levels in the required range.
These methods include, but are not limited to, water conservation practices, adding additional
application sites, updating your cropping systems, adding additional and/or more flexible
application equipment, and maintaining the lagoon levels at the lowest allowable and appropriate
levels throughout the year. Our staff looks forward to continuing to work with you and your
Technical Specialist to evaluate and implement any needed changes to your system.
ram►
>�
CEI MN
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location;
1 800 623-7748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax: [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, INC 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled 1 10% post -consumer paper
httpalh2o.enr.state, nc.us

Fo
s
m
C3
0
cc
Postage
0
CertlNed Fee
Q
0 ReWm Reclept Fee
(Firdorsement Required)
r-3 ResbWad Delivery Fen
C3(Endorsement Required)
fl Total Postage & Fees
m
m 0
Q I

In,idequate Freeboard
Judy Spedding
August 11, 2001
Page,2
Thank you again for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact the staff of our Wilmington Regional Office at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
CC: Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown, LLC
Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Patrick Fussell, DSWC
Wilmington�File„�s�-1=813
on- isch ra ge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Central Files

0� WArER 3 -~ S 1 *3 Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
CIO
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
O 'C Division of Water Quality
August 27, 2003
Mr. Jeff Spedding 1�CEIVED
Spedding Farms SEP U
PO Box 100 ���
Kenansville, NC 29349-0100
BY:
Subject: Animal Permit Record Keeping orms
General Permit Nos. NCA200000 & AWG 100000
Dear Mr. Spcdding:
The Non -Discharge Branch has conducted a review of the Spedding Farms record -keeping form submitted August 8, 2003.
Based on our review, the following form has been approved for use in conjunction with the requirements set forth in General
Permit Numbers NCA200000 and AWG100000.
1. Modified Form Irr-1
Please be aware that permittees are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in General Permit Numbers
NCA200000 and AWGI00000. Information required by the referenced permits must be included on forms provided by the
Division or approved by the Division. Please pay particular attention that all forms must include the facility name and
number. Any modifications to the approved forms must be submitted to the Division for review. Any oversights that
occurred in the review of the subject forms are still the responsibility of the permittee.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] x528 or (910) 486-
1541 x734. Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
M. Paul Sherman, P.E.
Environmental Engineer
Cc: Larry Baxley, Fayetteville Regional Office w/ attachments
Stoney Mathis, Wilmington Regional Office w/ attachments
Lyn Hardison, Washington Regional Office w/ attachments
Buster Towel[, Raleigh Regional Office w/ attachments
Alan Johnson, Mooresville Regional Office w/ attachments
Melissa Rosebrock, Winston Salem Regional Office w/ attachments
Kevin Barnett, Asheville Regional Office w/ attachments
Carroll Pierce, Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Non -Discharge Branch
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
DENR Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpl/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndb
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Form IRR-1 Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Records
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner: Judy Spedding Facility Number: 31-813
Operator: Jeff Spedding
� 3
fTotalWeather.
Minutes
=gjfiffif
M-Bul
Code
inspections
Weather Codes: C-Clear, PC -Partly Cloudy, CL-Cloudy, R-Rain, S-Snow/Sleet, W-Windy
Persons completing the irrigation inspections must initial to signify that inspections were
completed at least every 120 minutes
Note If conditions beyond the permitee's control have caused noncompliance with the
CAWMP or permit, Explain on the reverse.
Operators Signature

Spedding Farms
PO Box 100
Kenansville, NC 28349-0100
[phone]
Mr. Paul Sherman
NCDWQ
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: NPDES Form Submission
Dear Mr. Sherman,
Enclosed is a form ERR -I that I am submitting for approval. This form would more
adequately meet my needs in the field for recording irrigation events. The form that I
received with my NPDES permit did not allow for the recording of flow rates or nozzle
pressures that would allow me to calculate flow rates and it proved a little more
burdensome when transferring data to the IRR-2. Please review this form, at your
convenience, 9Ad advise me of any changes that would be necessary.
Enc.
*r'd
461 �Al sFp
0
9

0W1212003 09:38 919-715-6048
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
DWO NON DISCHARGE BR
3i-Sl3F15VA
A-rr
D E N R
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Branch
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Location: 512 N Salisbury Street, Suite 1219, Raleigh, NC 27604
Mailing Address: 1617 Mali Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
FAX: [phone]
Date: B/12L03
PAGE 01
FAX TO: Stoney Mathis I FAX NUMBER: 910-350-2004 ' 1
FROM: Paul Sherman
PHONE: [phone] x529
NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET: 3
Stoney,
This is a form that was submitted for my approval. Since it was from a farmer in your
region, I wanted you to look at It and let me know if you have any problems. Thanks,
Paul
If you receive this fax by mistake, call: Non -Discharge Branch C 919 733-5083 Ext. 556

08/12/2003 09:39 919-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 02
Spedding Farms
PO Box 100
Kenansville, NC 28349-0100
[phone]
Mr. Paul Sberrnan
NCDWQ
Note -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1611
RE: NPDES Form Submission
Dear Mr. Sherman,
Enclosed is a form UM-1 that F am submitting for approval. This form would more
adequately meet my needs in the field for recording irrigation events. The form that 1
received with my NPDES permit did not allow for the recording of flow rates or nozzle
pressures that would allow me to calculate flow rates and it proved a little more
burdensome when transferring data to the FRR-2, Please review this form, at your
convenience, Ad advise me of any changes that would be necessary.
Jeff cFc�
q�
Enc. G �8 "�➢U

03
{3r
p7
W
(
co
H
Q
Z
O
z
d
Q
co
Nr
M
LO
11
Orl
rn
of
m
1
I
Form IRR-1 Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Records
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner: Judy Spedding
Operator: Jeff Spedding
Facility Number: 31-813
r:End
Timei
•
-
• y
•
_ •
• •
_
•
�- •
M Weather Codes: C-Clear, PC -Partly Cloudy, CL-Cloudy, R-Rain, SSnow/Sleet, W-Windy
Persons completing the irrigation inspections must initial to signify that inspections were
• completed at least every 120 minutes
C Note If conditions beyond the permitee's control have caused noncompliance with the
W CAWMP or permit, Explain on the reverse. Operators Signature

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water quality
April 16, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Judy Spedding
PO Box 100
Kenansville NC 28349
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Request for Information
Inadequate Freeboard
Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
#31-813
Duplin County
Dear Sir or Madam:
On April 14, 2003, a representative of your animal operation informed the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) that there was inadequate freeboard in the lagoon(s) serving this facility.
This lack of adequate freeboard is in non-compliance with the Certificate of Coverage
issued to this facility on June 25, 1997. In addition to this Notice of Violation (NOV), this non-
compliance is subject to an appropriate enforcement action by DWQ. This action can consist of
one or more of the following: a civil or criminal enforcement action; an injunction; and/or a
requirement to apply for coverage under an individual permit. The action chosen will be based
on complete evaluation of all factors that resulted in the inadequate freeboard; the actions taken
to restore the needed freeboard; and the actions being proposed to prevent the problem from
reoccurring.
To assist. us in our review, please provide the Wilmington Regional Office with an
evaluation of the reasons for the freeboard violation(s) and a strategy to prevent future freeboard
violation(s). This evaluation and strategy must include but is not limited to the following:
Current Freeboard level(s)
Freeboard level records in the lagoon(s) for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
Spraying records for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
�D NR
Customer Service: Meiling Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623.6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699.1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us

Inadequate Freeboard
Page 2
Rainfall records for the past 12 months for this site up to the date of submittal (if
available)
Cropping system and PAN specified in the CAWMP. If the cropping system was not in
compliance with the facility's CAWMP, provide details of the cropping system in place
for the past 12 months.
A summary of actions taken to restore the needed freeboard in the lagoon(s) including but
not limited to removal of animals from the site, delay of restocking of animals, pumping
and hauling waste to another site (specify site), securing additional irrigation equipment,
and securing additional spray sites.
A description of water conservation measures in use at the facility and the date(s)
installed.
If the lagoon level(s) are still in violation of the facility's CAWMP and Permit, provide
an updated Plan of Action as to how the facility will return to compliance.
Provide a detailed description of the actions taken or proposed to be taken to insure that
there are no further freeboard violations at this facility.
This information must be received by the Wilmington Regional Office at the following
address no later than 10 days following receipt of this letter.
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-2845
Once this information is received and evaluated. by the DWQ staff, a determination will
be made as to the appropriate compliance/enforcement actions to be taken. Each case will be
evaluated on its own merit. The efforts by the owner/producer to notify DWQ of the problem,
efforts made to resolve the problem once identified, and efforts proposed to prevent future
problems will be positive factors in this determination.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you either the responsibility or
liability for this non-compliance or future cases of non-compliance. If you have any questions
regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact our Wilmington Regional Office Staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
�Ian W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Central Files

OF W A TER
c
0 �C
Judy Spedding
PO Box 100
Kenansville, NC 28349
Michael F. Easley, Governor _
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
September 17, 2002
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Response to Your September 13, 2002 Letter
Jeff & Judy Spedding — Grower #296
Facility Number: 31-813
Duplin County.-.._
Dear Ms. Spedding:
Thank you for your letter dated September 13, 2002 and the attachments. The following provides an
explanation as it relates to the information you submitted with the referenced letter.
The waste analysis report that you enclosed is dated March 1, 2002, and it is within 60 days of the
January 16, 17, 18, and 21, 2002 application events. This waste analysis report was not available during
Mr. Mathis May 30, 2002 inspection. If the referenced waste analysis report had been available during
the inspection, the notation of a violation for not having an analysis of the animal waste within 60 days of
the January 16, 17, 18, and 21, 2002 application events could have been avoided. Nonetheless, you have
the necessary analysis of the animal waste for the January 2002 application events so there is no violation
for not having an analysis of the animal waste within 60 days of the January 2002 events. However, the
violation that was noted for not having an analysis of the animal waste within 60 days of the November
2001 application events still stands. Also, you still need to ensure that an analysis of the animal waste
conducted within 60 days of a given application event is used to calculate the nitrogen applied for that
event on the application records.
The Soil Test Report that you enclosed is dated June 11, 2002, and it appears to be a representative soil
analysis as required by Condition Ili. 3 of the General Permit. Therefore, there is no violation of
Condition II1. 3 of the General Permit at this time. Please note that the June 11, 2002 Soil Test Report
indicates that there is a need for 1.3 tons of time per acre and 1.6 tons of lime per acre on the fields that
samples SF2 and SF3 represent, respectively. Please apply the lime as indicated in the soil test report in
order to comply with Condition II. 3 of the General Permit that states "Lime must be applied, as needed,
to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production."
W
N. C. Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension [phone] Customer Service
Wow
Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington, NC 28405 [phone] Fax [phone] NCDEN'R

Judy Spedding
September 17, 2002
Page Two
Be advised that all other violations noted in the Notice of Violation dated July 29, 2002 that are not
rescinded above are still violations as originally cited. Again, thank you for your correspondence. If you
have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
L/ (�� vices
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -- Brown, LLC
Patrick Fussell, DSWC-WiRO
DWQ Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit'
DWQ Central Files
Wilmingion)Files 3Tj1-8i1:�3,1)
S:\WQS\ANIMALS\DUPLIN\2002\31-813novresponse2

Jeff and Judy Spedding
Post Office Box 100
Kenansville, North Carolina 28349-0100
September 13, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Stonewall Mathis
Environmental Engineer I
NC Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington NC 28405
Subject: Response to Your September 4, 2002 Letter
Jeff and Judy Spedding — Grower #296
Facility Number: 31-813
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Mathis:
Per your request, please find animal waste analysis covering January 16, 17, 18, and 21, 2002 events and
soil samples received on June 12, 2002 enclosed.
Sincerely,

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone] _ _Report No: W06434 W
Grower: Spedding, Jeffrey - Copies To:
s PO Box 100
j Kenansville, NC 28349
.f * •
'a�- aste nalyszs eport
311102
Sample Info. Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
Sample ID: N P K Ca M9 S
Farm:
Duplin County
SOW
Total
596
102 713 151
31.3
31.0
2.93 0.32 116
0.15
1.24
1N -N
Waste Code:
-NH4
ALS
-NO3
Na Ni Cd
Pb
Al
Se Li pH
S5
C;N
DM%
CCE%
ALE K al
214
7.39
Description: OR-N
Swine Lagoon Liq.
Urea
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs/1000 allons
Other Elements
lbs17000
gallons
Application Method
N
P205
K20
Ca Mg S Fe
Mn
Zn
Cu
B Mo Cl
Na
Ni Cd
Pb
Ai
Se Li
Irrigation
2.5
0.94
5.7
0.88 0.18 0.18 0.02
T
0.01
T
0,01
1.8
Sample Info.
Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
Sample ID:
N
P K Ca
M
S
Fe Mn Zn
CU
B
Mo
Cl
C
FINISH
Total
699
67.1 741 138
33.1
43.4
2.64 0.38 0.70
0.23
1.38
IN -N
Waste Code:
-NH4
ALS
-NO3
Na Ni Cd
Pb
Al
Se Li pH
SS
C:N
DM%
CCE%
ALE K l
191
7.36
Description:
OR-N
Swine Lagoon Liq,
Urea
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop_lbs/1000
gallons
Other Elements
lbs/1000
allons
Application Method
N
F205
K20
Ca Mg S Fe
Mn
Zn
Cu
B Mo Cl
Na
Ni Cd
Pb
Al
Se Li
Irrigation
2.9
0.90
5.9
0.81 0,19 0.25 0.02
T
T
T
0.01
1.6

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone]
Report No: 38249
Grower:
Spedding, Jeffrey
Copies to: County Extension Director
PO Box 100
Soil
Test
Kenansville, NC 28349
Report
Farm:
6/11/02 SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS
Du lin County
Agronomist Comments:
C 12
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
805 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
SH Fes/OG/Tim,M
42002 0,
1st Crop; Fes/OGITim,M
0
120-200
0 0
0 0
0
0
12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Al (I)Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
NO-N NI-b-N Na
MIN 1.87 1.24
6.8 82.0
1,2 5.7 148 236
50.0 15.0
26
37 95
95
57
63
0.3
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
A05 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
SF2 Fes/OG/Tim,M
1st Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M
UT
120-200
0 0
0 0
0
0
12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Al (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1
Zn-A]
Cu-1
S 1
SS-1
Na-N NH-N Na
MIN 2.29 1.15
6.9 64.0
2.5 5,3 102 206
38.0 10.0
24
31 102
102
56
47
0.2
field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
R05 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
SH Millet,Pearl
1st Crap: Fes/OG/Tim,M
UT
120-200
0 0
0 0
0
0
12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Al (1)Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
N(b-N NH-N Na
MIN 3,37 1.22
6.5 55.0
2.9 5.3 67 108
38.0 9.0
26
33 170
170
38
40
0.1

o�oF w A rF9pG Michael F. Easley, Governor
y William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
C CO North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September 4, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7002 0860 0003 9550 8168
- RETURN'RECEIPT REQUESTED - -
Judy Spedding
PO Box 100
Kenansville, NC 28349
Subject: Response to Your August 12, 2002 Letter
Jeff.& Judy Spedding — Grower #296
- --Facility Number: -314813 - - - - - - - -
Duplin County
Dear Ms. Spedding:
Thank you for your letter of response to the Notice of Violation. In your letter, you address each of the
violations. You say that several'items have been repaired, plans are in place to reseed -fields, and record
keeping issues are being given proper attention. Your apparent efforts are appreciated. I may be in
contact in the near future to schedule a follow-up inspection of your facility to observe your
accomplishments.
1 am also in receipt of the wettable acre determination documentation and corresponding nutrient
management plans for your facility. Once again your efforts in completing this -task are appreciated. You
say in your letter that the newly calculated acreage and PAN are now being used. You also need to be
sure to perform land application of the animal waste in accordance with the wettable acre determination,
the nutrient management plans, and the permit. Also, be aware that the map and wettable acre
documentation describe a Hydrant E for the Feeder to Finish operation. However, Hydrant E appears to
have been inadvertently left out of the nutrient management plan for the Feeder to Finish operation.
Hydrant E must be included in the nutrient management plan in order to be used for animal waste
application.
You also say in- your letter that you feel that several of the violations do not warrant or should not be
considered a violation. However, be advised that the violations are violations as conveyed in the Notice
of Violation and as further described below:
1 } The existence of sinkholes and improperly functioning drain tile in the land application fields was
evidence that the land application fields were not being maintained at all times and properly
operated and so the resultant permit condition violation has been issued.
2) Fields 1 W and 2W of the finishing operation and Fields 1 W, 2W, 3W, and 4W of the sow _
operation were without a maintained stand of fescue. Consequently, a violation of the permit
condition that requires that a vegetative cover be maintained on the land application fields in
accordance with the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) has been issued.
N. C. Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension [phone] Customer Service AM
Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington, NC 28405 [phone] Fax [phone] LDEUR

Judy Spedding
September 4, 2002
Page Two
3) Animal waste leaks at the pumping station of the sow lagoon were evidence that the land
application equipment was not being maintained at all times and properly operated and so the
resultant permit condition violation has been issued.
4) The facility was being operated at a population above that allowed in the Certificate of Coverage
and the CAWMP. You say that this represents one point in time and that it is your understanding
that the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is considering using the annual average number of
animals to determine compliance. The present policy of the DWQ is that overstocking at any one
point in time is a violation. Therefore, the resultant violation has been issued.
-� "5) Rainwater from the surrounding' property and buildings entering the lagoon is a violation of the
permit. Therefore, the resultant violation has been issued.
6) It appears that you do not dispute the violation for not having an analysis of the animal waste
within 60 days of November 2001 application events. However, you say that there was an animal
waste analysis. for the January 16, 17, 18, and 21, 2002 events. Please submit a copy of the
referenced animal waste analysis report within ten days of your receipt of this letter.
Also, an analysis of the animal waste conducted within 60 days of the date of application needs to
be used to determine the amount of plant -available nitrogen (PAN) applied for an application in
accordance with Condition M. 5 of the General Permit.
7) The failure to keep lagoon- freeboard level records for the lagoons on a weekly basis are a
violation of the permit, and so the resultant violation has been issued.
8) The noted permit condition requires that a representative Standard Soil Fertility Analysis be
conducted. -During the inspection, Mr. Spedding said that the soil samples were not properly
taken. Improperly taken soil samples may not produce a representative analysis, and therefore the
resultant violation has been issued. You also say that new soil samples were collected and*reports
received on June 12, 2002. Please submit a copy of the referenced soil test reports within ten
days of your receipt of this letter.
Be advised that the Division of Water Quality may take further action in these matters including
assessment of civil penalties, injunctive relief, and permit revocation.

Judy Spedding
September 4, 2002
Page Three
Please submit the reports requested in item 6 and item 8 to this office within ten days of your receipt of
this letter. Again, thank you for your response. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please
do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Stonewall Mathis
Environmental, Engineer l
cc: Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy — Brown, LLC
Patrick Fussell, DSWC-WiRO
DWQ Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit -
DWQ Central Files
Wilmington Files 31-813
S:1WQSIANIMALSIDUPLM002131-813novresponse
Postal
-o
CERTIFIED MAIL
RECEIPT
rqi
,.
cc
0
Lnj
O F F
I C A
L U
Er
Oj'v'-
Postage
.$ ✓
0
31 ` $ certified Fee
, N C ,
3
p
r, ?
t
Retum Receipt Fee
yPostnmrk
Nere
.00
[Endorsement Roquired►
�
co
O
� Raqulradl
rU Total Postage 8 Fmm
C3
5
o
~
nt _
�r
\ d�'
1i P ✓G
ar PO Box No. ...................................... ? .. 00
..
City, Stole ! f

r
Jeff and Judy Spedding
Post Office Box 100 �rAUS 2 0 2002
Kenansville, North Carolina 28349-0100
August 12, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
NC Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington NC 28405
Subject: Notice of Violation
Jeff and Judy Spedding— Grower 4296
Facility Number: 31-813
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Shiver:
In response to your notice of violations dated July 29, 2002, please find below the information and written
plan of action requested.
1) VIOLATION:
Sinkholes that were possibly the result of improperly functioning drain
tiles were in the land application fields.
ACTION TAKEN:
The sinkholes noted showed no evidence of a discharge and in most tile
problems of this type the tile does not flow or function properly due to
material from the sinkhole blocking the tile. We consider this a repair
and maintenance of normal agriculture operations not warranting a
Violation. Nevertheless, the tile and sinkholes have been properly
repaired as of June 11, 2002.
2) VIOLATION:
Several application fields including Fields 1 W and 2W of the finishing
operation and Fields I W, 2W, 3W and 4W of the sow operation were
without a maintained stand of fescue as the receiving crop.
ACTION TAKEN:
All necessary agronomic steps to improve the stand of fescue had been
taken including re -seeding the fields twice. We could not control the
rainfall or temperature which are both necessary when re -seeding
fescue and the seeding window is fairly small resulting in insufficient
time to re -seed again. Once again, we do not feel that this should be
considered a Violation. Current plans are to re -seed designated
1Melds by September 30, 2002.

NC Division of Water Quality
Jeff and Judy Spedding — Grower #296
Facility Number: 31-813
Duplin County
-2 —
3) VIOLATION:
Animal waste leaks had occurred at the pumping station on the sow
lagoon.
ACTION TAKEN:
Repair and maintenance of farm equipment is standard operating
procedure. We agree that if a repair or maintenance problem is not
corrected in a reasonable time that a Violation may be in order. In this
case a leaky butterfly valve and air release have been repaired to
prevent leaks. There was no discharge to surface waters and the repair
was made in a timely manner. We feel that this should not be
considered a Violation.
4) VIOLATION:
The facility was being operated at 4007 Feeder to Finish animals and
1213 Farrow to Feeder animals.
ACTION TAKEN:
The number of animals shown on the NOV represent one point in time
for stocking. It is our understanding the DWQ is considering using the
annual average number of animals to determine if stocking is out of
compliance. Using the annual average numbers, we feel that our farm
will be in compliance. Our present action will be to discuss this
situation with Murphy -Brown Technical Specialists for
recommendations retrardina future stoekin. We feel that this item
should be deferred until DWQ issues a clear policy on how to
determine accurate stocking rates.
5) VIOLATION:
Rainwater had been entering the pipes that connect the swine houses to
the lagoon and thereby discharging into the lagoon at the finishing site.
ACTION:
We do not feel that this item should be considered a Violation.
Although additional rainwater should not enter the lagoon, it is
contained and recycled back through the buildings and sprayfields. It is
in our best interest to prevent excess water from entering the lagoon
and the nine has been repaired as of June It. 2002.
6) VIOLATION:
There was no analysis of the animal waste conducted within 60 days of
application events that occurred in November 2001 and on January 16,
17, 18, and 21, 2002.

NC Division of Water Quality
Jeff and Judy Spedding — Grower #296
Facility Number: 31-813
Duplin County
-3 -
ACTION:
Proffer animal waste analysis has been performed _since the
November 2001_violation and will be performed every 30 to 60 days
to ensure compliance with the General Permit, Condition 111.4. There
was an animal waste analysis for the January 16, 17, 18, and 21, 2002
events.
7) VIOLATION:
Lagoon freeboard level records were not being kept weekly for the
lagoons.
ACTION:
Although technically this may constitute a Violation, we feel that based
upon the total records kept that the 3 weeks missed due to an oversight
deserve noting and warning but not a Violation. We will be more
diligent in maintaininnweekly lemon freeboard level records to
stay in compliance.
8) VIOLATION:
Some of the soil samples for the Standard Soil Fertility Analysis may
have been improperly taken in the field.
ACTION:
We do not feel that this should be considered a Violation since soil
samples had been taken and were available for review. However, new
soil samples were collected and reports received on June 12, 2002.
In response to item 9, a Wettable Acre Determination was completed for our facility on June 11,2002 and
the newly calculated acreage and PAN are now being used. Please find enclosed all WAD documentation
including the WAD Certification, maps, calculation sheets, and the revised WMP. Copies of all WAD
documentation as well as the WMP has been sent to the Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation
District office.
We anticipate that this answers all your concerns. We desire to conduct our farm in compliance with all
rules and regulations and will continue to work diligently to accomplish this. We look forward to working
with your office.
Sincerely,

0_ � WA
. �F9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
�OQG
y William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 29, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL, # 7002 0860 0003 9550 8083
RETURN RECEIPT RESTED
Judy Spedding
PO Box 100
Kenansville, NC 28349
Subject. Notice of Violation
Jeff & Judy Spedding — Grower 4296
Facility Number: 31-813
Duplin County
Dear Ms. Spedding;
This is to notify you of violations of Swine Waste General Permit Number AWG 100000 under which
your facility is covered by Certificate of Coverage AWS310813.
On May 30, 2002, Mr. Stonewall Mathis of this office performed an inspection of your animal operation
and the animal waste management system serving your operation. During the inspection, Mr. Mathis
noted the following:
1) Sinkholes that were possibly the result of improperly functioning drain tiles were in the land
application fields. These sinkholes and improperly functioning drain tiles are violations of
Condition 1I. 1 of the General Permit that states "The collection, treatment, and storage facilities,
and land application equipment and fields shall be maintained at all times and properly operated."
2) The Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) for your facility designates the
receiving crop as fescue hay for the land application fields. Several application fields including
Fields I W and 2W of the finishing operation and Fields I W, 2W, 3W, and 4W of the sow
operation were without a maintained stand of fescue as the receiving crop. These are violations
of Condition 1I. 1 of the General Permit as stated above and Condition I1. 2 of the General Permit
that states "A vegetative cover shall be maintained on all land application fields and buffers in
accordance with the CAWMP. No waste may be applied upon fields not included in the
CAWMP."
3) Animal waste leaks had occurred at the pumping station on the sow lagoon. This is a violation of
Condition 1I, 1 of the General Permit.
4) The Certificate of Coverage and the CAWMP for your facility allows for an animal capacity of
no greater than 3672 Feeder to Finish and 1200 Farrow to Feeder. The facility was being
operated at 4007 Feeder to Finish animals and 1213 Farrow to Feeder animals. This is a violation
of Certificate of Coverage AWS310813 and Condition 1. 2 of the General Permit that
incorporates the CAWMP into the permit and states that any violation of the CAWMP shall be
considered a violation of the permit.
N. C. Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension [phone] Customer ServiceT
Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington, NC 28405 [phone] Fax [phone] WC—b9WNH

Judy Spedding
July 29, 2002
Page Two
5) Rainwater had been entering the pipes that connect the swine houses to the lagoon and thereby
discharging into the lagoon at the finishing site. This is a violation of Condition 11. 9 of the
General Permit that states "Unless accounted for in temporary storage volume, all
uncontaminated runoff from the surrounding property and buildings shall be diverted away from
the animal waste lagoons and storage ponds to prevent any unnecessary addition to the liquid
volume in the structures."
6) (a) There was no analysis of the animal waste conducted within 60 days of application events that
occurred in November 2001 and on January 16, 17, 18, and 21, 2002. These are violations of
Condition 111. 4 of the General Permit that states in part "An analysis of the animal waste shall be
conducted as close to the time of application as practical and at least within 60 days (before or
after) of the date of application."
(b) Also, an analysis of the animal waste conducted within 60 days of the date of application
needs to be used to determine the amount of plant available nitrogen (PAN) applied for an
application in accordance with Condition Ell. 5 of the General Permit. An August 22, 2001
analysis of the animal waste was being used to calculate the amount of PAN applied for May
2002 application events in violation of Condition III. 5.
7) Lagoon freeboard level records were not being kept weekly for the lagoons. This is a violation of
Condition 111. 2 of the General Permit that states in part "Waste lagoon and storage pond levels
shall be recorded weekly on forms supplied or approved by the DWQ."
8) Some of the soil samples for the Standard Soil Fertility Analysis may have been improperly taken
in the field. These are violations of Condition III. 3 of the General Permit that states "A
representative Standard Soil Fertility Analysis, including pH, copper, and zinc, shall be conducted
annually on each application field receiving -animal waste. The results of these tests shall be
maintained on file by the Permittee for a minimum of three years and shall be made available to
the DWQ upon request."
9) More acreage was being claimed on the application records than could be irrigated by the land
application equipment. These are violations of Condition III. 5 of the General Permit that states
"Records, including land application event(s) and removal of -solids to an off -site location(s)
records, shall be maintained by the Permittee in chronological and legible form for a minimum of
three years. These records shall be maintained on forms provided or approved by the DWQ and
shall be readily available for inspection." Also, proper means of assuring that land application
rates were in accordance with the CAWMP and that land application rates were not exceeding the
-Plant Available Nitrogen rate for the receiving crop were not in use; Condition 11. 4 of the
General Permit states "Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. in no
case shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available Nitrogen rate for the receiving crop or
result in runoff during any given application."
In response to the violations noted in this item, you are required to have a Wettable Acre
Determination (WAD) completed for your facility. Only the acres that are wetted can be credited
in the waste management plan (WMP) as receiving waste application. Any acreage that cannot

I/
Judy Spedding
July 29, 2002
Page Three
be covered by waste application equipment cannot be used as part of your plan. Please contact a
Technical Specialist to have him or her conduct a WAD for your facility. The Technical
Specialist must be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission
to conduct Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialists with the N.C. Cooperative
Extension Service, the Sol] and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, and the Division of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
In conjunction with the completion of a WAD for your facility, any and all needed modifications
to your Animal Waste Management System must be made, and the WMP for your facility must
be revised in accordance with the WAD and modifications. A copy of all WAD documentation
including the WAD Certification, maps, calculation sheets, and the revised WMP must be
submitted to this office by August 31, 2002. Please note that if you install or modify your
irrigation system, a designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer must also sign the
WAD Certification. Also, please note that both the owner and the Technical Specialist must sign
the WAD Certification and the WMP. All WAD documentation as well as the WMP must be
kept at your facility. Also, a copy of these documents must be kept on file at the local Soil and
Water Conservation District office.
Be advised that upon completion of the foregoing requirements in this item, application of animal
waste must be performed in accordance with the WAD and the revised WMP, and land
application records must be kept accordingly.
In response to these violations, a detailed Plan of Action must be submitted to this office. This Plan of
Action must include the following:
For items 1 through 8.
a. The individual violations.
b. A description of the actions proposed to be taken to bring each violation to
compliance.
c. A description of the actions proposed to be taken to prevent the recurrence of
each violation.
d. A list showing the dates of when these actions will be accomplished.
For item 9, the requirements must be completed as required in item 9.
The proposed written plan of action and information must be received by this office within fifteen
(15) working days of your receipt of this notice.
You may wish to contact your Service Company, County Soil & Water Conservation District Office,
County Extension office, a qualified technical specialist, and/or a professional engineer for any assistance
they may be able to provide.

Judy Spedding
July 29, 2002
Page Four
Be advised that the Division of Water Quality may take further action in these matters including
assessment of civil penalties, injunctive relief, and permit revocation.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Stonewall Mathis
at [phone].
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation
Kenneth Best, Duplin County Health Department
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy — Brown, LLC
Patrick Fussell, DSWC-WiRO
Star Maready, Duplin County Extension
DWQ Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Wiimington Fiiesr3'1-8_M
S:\WQS\ANB4ALS\DUPLEN12002\31-813nov
m
o(DoMeStiC Mail
m
0
Ln
Ln
rr =OF F
m Sk ") Postage
:o
a
Cartifiad Fee
0 Return RecalPt Fee
.n (Erxlorsemerrt Required)
rO Restricted Dellmy Fee
G7 (Ertdoreement RequIM4
fU ;M1 Poetege S Foes
0
r-3 err! o
r_ .A.-

Revised April 20 1999
.JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number 3 i - S7 V3, Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: ��e- F LL acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: Part II eligibility items) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
Date of site visit: ~��� —Q _ _ _ exemption E1 E2. ,E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP:y Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on_ 6Y P2 P3
Annual farm PAN deficit: pounds
Irrigation Systems) - circle #hard -hose traveler; ..2. center:pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map'depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE:'75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fall the eligibility checklist in Part If. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11- F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART ll. 75% Rule .Eligibility Checklist and .Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination.requiredbecause .operation fails:one of. the,eligibility
requirements listed below:
sr 1Lack.of�creage_whichTesultedinzverapplicationmf+yvastewater�(PAN) onepray_.
fields) according#ofarm'sdasttwo yearsmf-.irrigation-xecords.---.
. F2 UnclearjIlegible, .or lack of-information/map.-
F3 Obviousfield-timitabons-(numerous:ditches,fallure:to:deduct:required::.:..
buffer/setback:acreage;-or25°/fl:oftotal:acreageidentified_in,CAWMP.. includes ,:
small, -irregularly shaped fields fields:lessfhan 5 acres :for.travelers:or.less :than
2 acres for.stationarysprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage -in excess -
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part Ill.

Revised Apri120, 1999
Facility Number -
Part 111. Field
by Field Determination of
75% Exemption
Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'S
TYPE OF
(IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
71
FIELD NUMBER' - hvdrant_ oulLzone_ orMint numbers may be used in place of field numbers
depent in❑ on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system.- If pulls, etc. crossTnorethan'one field, inspectorlreviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; -otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBERZ - must be clearly delineated on -map.
COMMENTS'- back-up fields with CAWMP acFeage-exceeding 75% of its total.acres and havingreceived less than 50%
of its annual PAN as -documented in the falm's previous -two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation -records, -cannot serve -as -the
sole basis10r-requiring a WA Determination.=Back-upfiieldsTnust-be noted in the-comment:sectionand must be accessible
by irrigation 'system.
Part IV. Pending WA Determinations -
V' P1 Plan Jacks :following:information: S� 1S 14 ce-lo,�IZ-W 3k
P2 Plan -revision may:satisfy-75% rule based on adequate overa I PAN deficit -and by St
adjusting -all field -acreage�o-below 75% use rate rAP
P3 Other (iern process of installing new irrigation system):

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment kv?3'A
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality RE��IVED
FEB 0 3 2000
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary BY: 7rcD
Kerr T. Stevens, Director FORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
January 24, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Judy Spedding
Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
PO Box 100
Kenansville NC 28349
Subject: Conditional Approval
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 31-813
Duplin County
Dear Judy Spedding:
Our records indicate that your facility was conditionally certified in order to fulfill the requirements
of completion of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan Certification. This letter is to inform you
of your unresolved conditional approval status. Any facility receiving a conditional approval must notify
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) in writing within 15 days after the date that the work needed to resolve the
conditional certification has been completed. Any failure to notify DWQ as required, subjects the owner to
an enforcement action. As of December 6, 1999, we have no record of any information from you, advising
us of the status of your conditional approval. Therefore, please fill out the attached form and have your
technical specialist and landowner sign the form in the appropriate areas.
The completed form must be submitted to this office on or before 45 days of receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or liability
for failure to provide DWQ with proper notification of your conditional certification status or possible failure
to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste management plan by
December 31, 1997.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]
extension 571.
Sincerely,
Sonya L. Avant
Environmental Engineer
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Judy Spedding
Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
PO Box 100
Kenansville NC 28349
Dear Judy Spedding:
A&IF?WAA
• 'A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 31-813
Duplin County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January i, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. ERR I, IRR2, DRY I, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR I, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
09
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
Z/6"7d__
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 276"-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

APR727-99 TUE 9:54 AM BROWN S FAX K 9102961675 F. 6
786 Hwy 24 Qast
PO Box 497
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
Voice: (910) 29&1 SW
Fall: (S10) 29MI66
FaX
Tee
gar Llywlf
Froew
BRowN's
OF CAROLINA
%,ems--�
Fans f Q l 35o oo
Phwee: Dates
FRa: CC:
13 Urgent or Review 0 Please Comment O Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle
e Commentse
31 g) S

& APR-27-99 TUE 9:49 AM BROWN S
FAX NO, 9102961675 P. I
M
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
County:
Farm Type:
Farm Capacity:
Storage Structure:
Storage Period:
Application Method:
Jeff Spedding
Jeff & Judy Spedding
Duplin
Feed -Fin Far -Feed
3672 1200
Anaerobic Lagoon
180 days
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner
1, Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

APR-27-99 TUE 9�49 AM BROWN S FAX NO, 9102961675 P. 2
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, ft3, tons, etc.):
3672
animals X
986
gal/animal/year =
3,618,756
gallons
2000
animals X
4015
gal/animal/year =
4818000
gallons
TOTAL 8436756 gallons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (Ibs):
3672 animals X
2000 animals X
2.30 lbs/animal/year =
6.5 Ibs/anlmal/year =
8,445.60 Ibs
7800 Ibs
TOTAL 16245.6Ibs
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
Page: 2

APR-27-99 TUE 9:50 AM BROWN S FAX NO. 9102961675 P. 3
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type, and surface application.
Trac# Field 5oii1
Crop
Yield Ibs N
Acres Lbe N1Ac
Lbs N
" Ibs N I
Time to
_ ape
Code
IAc lunit
Residual
IAc
Re aired !
Apply
1707 2 Wo
G
3.0 50.00
92.3
150.0
13837.50
S-June
1707 2 GbA
G
3.7 50.00
13.5
185.0
2497.50
S-June
—
�--
Total
905.8
-----
16335.00
.�..
Available N
16245.60
*Difference
.89.40
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer
annuals.
`A negative number reflects the total Ibs of additional nitrogen needed to achieve yields on
acreage listed in chart_ A positive number means additional acreage is required to utilize the
nitrogen produced by the farm.
NOTE:
This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will defnately interfere
Page: 3

APR-27-99 TUE 9'50 AM BROWN S FAX NO, 9IC2961675 P. 4
017 stsf7d elf be rmudagrass, loss of stand will result in reduce- gilds and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
The following legend explains the crop codes listed in the table above:
Cr4R,.Cod0 Crap
A
Barley
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
D
Corn - Grain
E
Corn - Silage
F
Cotton
G
Fescue - Grazed
H
Fescue- Hay
I
Oats
J
Rye
K
Small Grain - Grazed
L
Small Grain - Hay
M
Grain Sorghum
N
Wheat
O
Soybean
LtLs.B_V3jL1z0d_1_Q,0.it.yieJd
1.6 lbs N / bushel
50 lbs N / ton
50 lbs N / ton
1.25 lbs N / bushel
12 lbs N / ton
0.12 lbs N / lbs lint
50 lbs N / ton
50 lbs N / ton
1.3 lbs N / bushel
2.4 lbs N / bushel
100 lbs N / acre
133 lbs N / acre
2.5 lbs N / cwt
2.4 lbs, N / bushel
4.0 lbs N / bushel
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
Page: 4

APR-27-99 'TUE 9:51 AM BROWN S FAX NO. 9102961675 P. 5
agronom'sc ratgg. TYA A10ge OW&6 r UVrrbnf rich and will require pr&autionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 0.36 pounds of plant available nitrogen per animal per year in the
in sludge based on the application method listed earlier.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 6609.60
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermudagrass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 22.03 acres of land. If you apply
the sludge to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 52.88 acres of land.
Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and land needed. Actual requirement
could vary by 25% depending on your sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and
applications,
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate Is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Tract
1707
Fieid
- 2
Soil
T_ l p/ e .
Croce
G
Application Rate
In/hr
0.40
Application Amount 1,
* inches _
0.75
Wo
11707I
2
GbA
G
0.50
1.00
*This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Page: 5

APR-27-99 TUE 9:51 AM BROWN S FAX NO, 9102961675 P, 6
Brous facility is designed for 18 ays of fPA*,nvp•Src rdye and me f"60rary storage must
6WNGd' on foie average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipmen
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
Additional Comments:
Plan revised to reflect 75% rule for wetted acres determination.
141 total crop acres in field . 123 in soil type Wo, & 18 in soil type GbA.
There is approximately 45 acres that is apart of this farm that is not included
in this plan. Landowner could install irrigation system for use if so needed.
u1
Page: 6 1

Page: 8 0
NUTRIENT MANXGEMENT PLAN CERTIFICAtdN
Name of Farm: Jeff Spedding
Owner/Manager Agreement: Jeff Spedding
ltwe understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. llwe know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoo
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm, I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager (if
Signature:
Jeff &).udv peddi
owner): ��€ff Spedding _
Please Print
Name of Technical Specialist: Jimmy R. Vinson
Affiliation: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Address: P.O. Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone: [phone]
Signature:
Page: 7

APR-27-99 TUE 9:52 AM BROWN S FAX NO. 9102961675 P. 7
• :w.yy�� y� � w �• Ln �D• Y
.yam •'�•� f, 'ir . •� ,.5k �h` F+ f�� �.
''a+'•' rso
ig -�. "r.'� :ri •y`Art'.�'�V .. ., ,S'1�alr j"' J!. '•
•'1',k',!`+ii►ti,'�1.;:Y, Y yy��'• i. '•r}\- r S, <'"Y' F*��' it ' ',1f �•..�.{
v.r.s 4• L-r y :G't; �. °° ': �:F '.J!"1 '�Yli �J, ,a 1F 1 • r x '� 4 ,�',` 'c' aL•
. ki•tr .':1�, •* ''��' `J;.• ,�., � '.'��'' ���.�E � ' .v `� � ta�,� 6��i;,•�jL'y°' asK '
y1 } Y r'>sv+i. �.�'+' �' • F- "'`, *r! s ih,
�40tg./Kt",
.' �F�v
�.Y;.
',}i `r,,w ' _Yf el � •-ter ,ti', . . $,'� '•�'
171
t :Y ill.' ;.� .,1, •l •.1: ,;5'� �4 .1 �' y�'\' :-O
y
1pk
All
AM
A4Li.--:. �I'V��W '�C� t, r iC'. 1 ,r. t��] y` r?j.i •_ ,ti` •�,�Y r�� i�
+•a/K';f�;iy � �+, z f y '_� 4.tS. '�7� ':i li 1'r !',ii •.c'• •t..'. ,• ��[�' - � .
' +�l �rE�-1t'�+. jY'i' � .{ 1 ,rn") f s ,��•. +x 1 r. �` •�,� T� �'•
i.� 1 .7f ! T ,�' }1 i 7 Ira .1,�' l�•T_, Y1 �'
, Is h } � ., fop, , v �� � ...�• �
�!I" �-t ��4 tip- �'�.•� i�k� , �.� �_ •',`''�,.�� ,�.� `��. �': +:�f �� �: ��('a �•,�� r ,
��4 r� a'•`181 t�. `'R.. �'1Y,'� L : �•, ' '! L ,, ti 'S`��`
`•`., :1. ~,'.Py,'Q���.4���'�r `■ :`'1�' r:�y; ,.,�, .'y{ •': ..i.8 #3•. jri rii '�! rr �1� •,'%
a. �+ � w]:; .saa �„V:'i� .1 f.' }. . x�+i'•:a: '' •.�fr i► ri•�St �'
. u.�a 4,a �' '•• t rf,,: T��•'L, 4Z ti ,, ' •i *. •..a• r.•�-J s
LE
e: r +. �r• r• ,r..� �./Q��-_•a+'3.•.:{�: � 4 F r r, `�• • � r .1•; �� �•�� �y�_• �
,A }' 'A '' ,L , 'fit +��T'" foW1i' r 'y' r G•i, '!i } [ ,,,dr �I ��} a• ' ��,y1li �?r 1 ` .0
��;i'.:';jFy• �' _t ,',rr. ��g-��.•`,•ti .'':y3,'�Y �N' �rrr, �' ,*, �•k• j4�y���"Y,"�'�`,yr� {,d„ ���'�A�� . A.
.` r 'y.
''•�aY� t, :6i� • ( £, ip.` ��1•liY.='/�yi �.�T•T �+�-. ��.• ;j,�.�y• .r. t �� ��.��'
' i. �f�.�'�,Ir�Tc+i�a •„5?Z,+�` yC• ��4��rr'C�,�Siy'L���. .w �: �''E�.���, i'}` �
lk
'p�Jy, •+ ^1S/�Y±.�Y �_`%``'�� .,!!•,�ii� :•l, •y •. V1... .{ •.�,li�(; '''.1 I f�3 ��� •;•
�' `.!W �. '};.�.':�•,i tit aj�'� • ��' �• �, l /.
• "�•� .•.{.�s, �; � •; is � r - { '
• t tir.,y'+e t5} ry . �4..�Ijr".'' , 1 ,i .:5i + w �'• 1,,.•s",�f •. t _
w, �• �•_;,, •..r ' 40- ` +- Farm

oGW
Revised.Apri120, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number S_- 313 Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: t g acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Repres g ntati e: Para // eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name:
Date of site visit:_ 3111"
Date of most recent WUP: 3
^Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time b37,
d on
exemption E1 E2 E3
Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on P1 P2 P3
Annual farm PAN deficit: pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: hard -hose traveler, . center -pivot system; 3. Iinear-move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/p.e , . stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part II, overrides Part I exemption.)
El Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed'by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
V E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE:75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11- F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part Ili).
PART 11. 75% Rule.Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. -WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed :below:
_F1 Lack -of mcreage:-whichTesulted in -over.-applicabon:Df wastewater. -(PAN) on -spray
field (s)according-tofarm's-last -two -yea rsaf"Imgation:records.-.
F2 Unclear, -illegible, -or lack of information/map.
_ F3 Obviousfeld-limitations -(numerous:ditches;iailure:to:deduct-Tequired
buffer/setback:acreage; or.25%-.of.total:acreageadentified:in'CAWMP_::mcludes
small; irregularly shaped -fields = fields lesslhan-5-acres-for..travelers-or.lessihan
2 acres-for.stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits feld(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part Ill.

Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number 31 , SIB
Part 111. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption
Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
COMMENTS'
1 (")6 "I J
Z-
,-� • v
I
i o5•
S.
1
I
I
•I
I I
-
1
I
I
I I
I
I
I
i
I
I.
I
FIELD NUMBER' -hydrant pull, zone, or point numbers -maybe used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation -system. If pulls, etc. cross -more then one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBER - must be clearly delineated -on map. `
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP.acreage_exceeding 75% of its total acres and havinareceived less than 50%
of its annual PAN as -documented in thefarm'sprevious.two years' (1997 & 1998) of inigationTecords, cannot serve as the
sole basis -for requiring a WA Determ_ination:.:Back-upfields-must-be noted in the -comment section -and must be accessible
by irrigation system.
Part IV. Pending WA Determinations -
Pi Plan Jacks following -information:
P2 Plan revision -may:satisfy75% rule based on adequate overall PAN deficit -and by
adjusting all field.acreage#o below 75% use rate
P3 Other (ielin process of installing new irrigation system):

Revised January 22, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number 31 _ _ _� Operation ls'flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: Varrv-s acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Repres ntati . Ae-U So Part/1 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: diw, Witnyx Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
Date of site visit: exemption El E2 E3 E4
— 1�6' 91 � 3 6T4.4
Date of most recent WUP: AnnuaCfarm PAN deficit: pounds
Irrigation System(s) - cir : 1. hard -hose travel , 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w permanen pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
El Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and WD3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an 1 or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11- F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART 11.75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to' deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
/ 2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
Of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part Ill.

Reviscd January 22, 194'
Facility Number -T3I -a In
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUM13ERt-2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
. 1
FIELD NUMBER'
- hydrant. Dull- zone_ or Doint numbers may be used in Dface of field numbers deoendina on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspectorlreviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER 2 - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

MAR-23-99 TUE 3:50 PM BROWN S
786 Hwy 24 Ewa
PO Box 487
Womaw, NC 26396 M7
Woe: (91 b) 298` 1 SM
Fax. [phone]
Fax
FAX NO, 9102961675
3f- Fi3
P. 1
BROWN1�
OF CAROLINA
TO: /ale � /� uy11'1 From S2//Ll�
Faw f Q r �`�.SD ��©� Pages:
Phone: Date: 7j •-�' G!
Re: CC:
0 Urgent [;'for Rerlow 0 Please Continent D Please Reply 0 Please Recycle
e Comment::

♦'
MAR-23-99 'SUE 3:50 PM BROWN S FAX NO, 9102961675
r
3-23-99
Brian Wren
DENR-DWQ
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC
Dear Brian:
Today i checked the lagoon marker at the farm of Jeff Speeding. The marker is
actually 2" inches lower than required. The lagoon today measured 23" inches total
freeboard.
Also we changed his waste management plan to reflect the 75% rule for wetted
acres.
If you need my additional information, please let me know
;incely yours,
y Vinso
onmental Resource Manager
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC.
785 FWY 24 FAST • P.O. BOX 487 • WARSAW, N.C. 28398 • PHONE [phone]

State of North Carolina
F?WA
Department of Environment .
2
and Natural ResourcesIT
•
Division of Water Quality
,lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
NCDENR
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
June 26, 1998
Judy Spedding
Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
PO Box 100
Kenansville NC 28349
Subject:
Reissuance of Certificate of Coverage
No.AWS310813
Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and
Application System
Duplin County
Dear Judy Spedding:
The Division of Water Quality modified the Swine Waste Operation General Permit originally issued to
this facility on June 25, 1997. In accordance with the issuance of the revised General Permit, we are
forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Judy Spedding, authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but
not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower 4296, located
in Duplin County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 3672 Feeder to Finish and 1200 Farrow to
Feeder and the application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Maiiagement Plan
(CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003, and shall hereby void
COC No AWS310813 dated June 25, 1997. The COC shall hereby incorporate by reference any specific
conditions of the previous COC issued to this facility. The purpose of this COC is to allow coverage
under the revised General Permit. Please review the revised General Permit (enclosed) and pay
particular attention to Condition II.10 regarding tree removal from lagoon embankments, Condition III .1
regarding inspection frequency of the waste treatment, storage and collection system and Condition III.6
regarding notification requirements for system failures, spills and emergencies. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143=2-15.6A throughf-143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] . FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS310813
Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
Page 2
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. 1f you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact Katharine Keaton at [phone] ext. 533.
Sincerely,
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County Health Department
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

State of North Carolina 'T
Department of Environment, IVE D_ LTX;WA
Health and Natural Resourc s « s
Division of Water Quality JUN 3 0 1997
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor BY:
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary I D E H N R
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 25, 1997
Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
PO Box 100
Kenansville NC 28349
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310813
Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Duplin County
Dear Jeff & Judy Spedding:
In accordance with your application received on June 13, 1997, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) to Farm No. 31-813, authorizing the operation of an animal waste collection,
treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with the State's General Permit (attached).
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of
animal waste from the Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296 Farm, located in Duplin County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 3672 Feeder to Finish and 1200 Farrow to Feeder, and the application
to a minimum of 128.0 acres of land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2001. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of
wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data
and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater
than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0536 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J. K. Jallah at [phone] ext. 364.
Sincerely,
d4l-'A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County Health Department
Wilmington Reg%nal=Office,—Water-Quality-Section
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
January 13, 1998
MEMORANDUM
RECEIVED
TO: Wilmington Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Sue Homewood
SUBJECT: Notification of Facility Number Change
JAN 1 5 1988
The following changes have been made to the Animal Operations Database. Please make
appropriate changes in your files.
Facility numbers 31-142 and 31-157 were both duplicates of facility number 31-813.
Facility numbers 31.142 and 31-157 were deleted from the animal operations database.
If you have any comments or questions please feel free to call me at [phone] ext 502.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resource
RECEIVED 4 • • .
Division of Water Quality
NOV 12 1991
M�Nkkr=��
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor E H N F�
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary BY: =11t:)
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 31, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Attn: Buck Sholar
Buck Sholar Farm
828 Sheffield Rd
Rose Hill NC 28458
Subject: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violation of N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and
15A NCAC 8F .0201
Buck Sholar Farm
Facility #: 31-142
Duplin County
Case#:'QV 97-017
Dear Buck Sholar:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and a notice of a civil penalty assessed against
Buck Sholar in the amount of $500.00. This assessment is based upon the following facts:
Buck Sholar operates an animal operation and associated animal waste management
system in Duplin County.
As of January 1, 1997, in accordance with N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 817.0201
a certified operator in responsible charge is required to operate the subject animal waste
management system.
In accordance with 15A NCAC 8F .0201(a)� the owner of each animal operation having
an animal waste management system must submit a letter to the Certification Commission,
Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Technical Assistance and Certification Group, which
designates an Operator in Charge with the appropriate type of certification. This letter
must be signed by the owner and the certified operator and be submitted to the
Certification Commission by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date.
In November, 1996 and April, 1997, DWQ mailed notices to all animal waste management
facilities who had not designated an operator with the DWQ.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Buck Sholar failed to designate an appropriately certified wastewater treatment operator
in responsible charge of the subject animal waste management system, in accordance with
15A NCAC 8F .0201(a).
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that Buck Sholar violated or
failed to act in accordance with the requirements of N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F
.0201. A civil penalty of not more than $1,000 per day may be assessed against a person who is
required but fails to designate an appropriately certified wastewater treatment operator as
required by N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.5 and 15A NCAC 8F .0500.
Based upon the above facts and conclusions of law, I hereby assess Buck Sholar a
$500.00 civil penalty for this violation of N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F .0201 pursuant
to the authority delegated to me by N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F .0201.
Please find attached another Operator in Charge designation form. Please complete this
form and return it to:
WPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If. the- aforementioned operator designation form is not at the above address within 30 days
of your receipt of this notice, you will be subiect to further civil penalties of up to $1,000 for each
day that the operator in charge designation is not submitted. You may contact DWQ's Training
and Certification Group at [phone] for information about designating a certified operator.
Within thirty days receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the Department 'of Environment and Natural
Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will not foreclose
enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s). Please submit payment
to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
or
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment letter.
Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such
a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative

hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in dispute. You
must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and stipulation form and a
detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of.
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section ChiefIDWQ
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
OR
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must request
an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition to
the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes. You must:
File your original petition with the:
Office of Administrative Hearings
P.O. Drawer 27447
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447
and
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Richard Whisnant
Office of General -Counsel
NCDENR
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611

Failure to exercise one of the options above within th' irty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter being
referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect the
penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations which
occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any'questions, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone],
extension 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, t P.E
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Comphance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central-Filesw/-attachments
Public Information Officer w/attachments

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
COUNTY OF
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADNUNISTRA.TIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO.
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality
dated, , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of , 19� .
TELEPHONE

ANTML A.Lf WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OPERATOR .IN CHARGE
DEISTCYNATION FORE
ANL ENTAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:
Facility ID Number: County:
OPERATOR IN CHARGE
Home mailing Address.
City S tate Zip
Certificate n _ Social Security
Work Phone Horne Phone
Signature Date
O WNI ER
Mailing. Address. City
State Zip Telephone?
Signature Date
Please Mail to: WPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh,, N.C. 27626-0535

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resource
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor �IBY
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary ==
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Attn: Buck Sholar
Buck Sholar Farm
828 Sheffield Rd
Rose Hill NC 28458
Dear Buck Sholar:
ECENED` • ��/
NOV 12 1997 �1
EHN�
October 31, 1997
Subject: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violation of N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and
15A NCAC 8F .0201
Buck Sholar Farm
Facility #: 31-142
-Duphn County
Case #: OV 97-017
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and a notice of a civil penalty assessed against
Buck Shofar in the amount of $500.00. This assessment is based upon the following facts:
Buck Sholar operates an animal operation and associated animal waste management
system in Duplin County.
As of January 1, 1997, in accordance with N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F .0201
a certified operator in responsible charge is required to operate the subject animal waste
management system.
In accordance with 15A NCAC 8F .0201(a), :the owner of each animal operation having
an animal waste management system must submit a letter to the Certification Commission,
Division of Water Quality (DWQ, Technical Assistance and Certification Group, which
designates an Operator in Charge with the appropriate type of certification. This letter
must be signed by the owner and.the certified operator and be submitted to the
Certification Commission by January. 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date.
In November, 1996 and April, 1997, DWQ mailed notices to all animal waste management
facilities who had not designated an operator with the DWQ.
P.O. Box.29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Buck Sholar failed to designate an appropriately certified wastewater treatment operator
in responsible charge of the subject animal waste management system, in accordance with
15A NCAC 8F .0201(a).
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that Buck Sholar violated or
failed to act in accordance with the requirements of N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F
.0201. A civil penalty of not more than $1,000 per day may be assessed against a person who is
required but fails to designate an appropriately certified wastewater treatment operator as
required by N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.5 and 15A NCAC 8F .0500.
Based upon the above facts and conclusions of law, I hereby assess Buck Sholar a
$500.00 civil penalty for this violation of N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F .0201 pursuant
to the authority delegated to me by N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F .0201.
Please fund attached another Operator in Charge designation form. Please complete this
form and return it to:
WPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If the aforementioned operator designation form is not at the above address within 30 days
of your receipt of this notice, you will be subject to further civil penalties of up to $1,000 for each
day that the operator in charge designation is not submitted. You may contact DWQ's Training
and Certification Group at [phone] for information about designating a certified operator.
Within thirty_days receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will not foreclose
enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s). Please submit payment
to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
P.O.-Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
or
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment letter.
Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such
a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative

hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in dispute. You
must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and stipulation form and a
detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief/DWQ
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
OR
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must request
an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition to
the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes. You must:
File your original petition with the:
Office of Administrative Hearings
P.O. Drawer 27447
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447
and
'Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Richard Whisnant
Office of General Counsel
NCDENR
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611

Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter being
referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect the
penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations which
occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone],
extension 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, J RE
ATTACHMENTS
cc: LI�egional_St�pgrvisor. wl-attachrrient's
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public Information Officer w/attachments

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT }
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST }
PERMIT NO. )
ENVIROi'\F1MENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADNIINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO.
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division 'of Water Quality
dated, , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of _ _ 19
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
'ERAJQR TN CHARGE
DRS-T(7,NA,TTQN EQRM
ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:
Facility ID Number: County:
OPERATOR IN CHARGE
Home Mailing Address.
City S tate Zip
Certificate Y Social Security;
Work Phone-- Some Phone
Signature Date
OWNER
Mailin;. Address. _ City
State Zip Telephone#
Signature Date
Please Mail to: WPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality
P. 0. Box 29535
Raleigh,. N.C. 27626-0535

0 'i
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 3, 1997
Buck Sholar.
Buck Sholar Farm
"828 Sheffield Rd
Rose Hill NC 28458
M1J'X;WA
�EHNR
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Buck Sholar Farm
Facility Number 31--142
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Sholar:
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996,. that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely,
)", W.'X-0'
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdeslet 1
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535, 1P;6 FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 itifC An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]o9b recycles/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Buck Sholar
Buck Sholar Farm
828 Sheffield Rd
Rose Hill NC 28458
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Buck Sholar Farm
Facility ID#: 31-142
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Sholar:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator"for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P. ., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 NvAWfC An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
voice 919-715-4100 97k recycled/ 10°k post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr. Division of Environmental Management Jonathan B. Howes
Governor Water Quality Section Secretary
December 5, 1995
Certified Mail # Z 405 591 384
Return Receint Requested
Buck Sholar, Jr.
Rt.7 Box 263
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Subject: Buck Sholar Farms
Facilities: 31-142 (JON), 31-143 (JSF)
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Sholar:
On November 30, 1995, in response to an anonymous complaint, Staff from the Wilmington Regional
Office of the Division of Environmental Management inspected your animal operation and the lagoon(s) serving
this operation. It was observed at this time that both operations had appropriate freeboard levels. However,
both spray fields were overgrown by weeds rather than the appropriate crop outlined in the waste utilization plan
(coastal bermuda grass.) It was observed that both fields were dry and did not appear to have been utilized
recently.
As was discussed in our telephone conversation on November 30, you need to re-establish and maintain
the appropriate crop and acreage rotation required by your certified waste utilization plan. USDA -MRCS
requirements specify that animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops. And that waste nutrients
shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take
up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop on bare soil.
To remain a deemed permitted facility, you must notify this office in writing within thirty (30) days of
the receipt of this notice, what actions will be taken to comply with your waste management plan. Failure to
do so may result in the facility losing it's deemed permitted status and being required to obtain an individual non
discharge permit for the facility.
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 28405.3845 a telephone [phone] + Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Buck Sholar, Jr.
December 5, 1995
Page 2
Please be aware it is a violation of North Carolina General Statutes and Rules to discharge wastewater
to the surface waters of the State without a permit and/or to fail to follow a certified waste management plan.
The Division of Environmental Management has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $10,000
per day per violation.
Again, when the required corrective actions are complete, please notify this office in writing at the
address provided. If you have any further questions concerning this matter, please call David Holsinger or Dave
Adkins at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
:��
avid R. Holsinger
Environmental Engineer
cc: Dave Adkins, Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Mike Sugg, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Ronald Kennedy, Duplin County Health Department
Tom Jones, NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation
DEM Operations Branch

5 . %
REGISTRATION FORM FOR ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIORS
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Re urces �
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
If the animal waste management system for your feedlo1kt9perat!-01h' �;�
is designed to serve more than or equal to 100 head of�C'Attle, 75,,,?�
horses, 250 swine, 1,000 sheep, or 30,000 birds that are`vLe
by a liquid waste system, then this form must be filled out
mailed by December.31, 1993 pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 (c) in
order to be deemed permitted by DEM. Please print clearly.
Farm Name: Buck Sholar
Route 2 Box 263
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Duplin County 919-289-4660(H)
Owner(s) Name:
Manager(s) Name:
Lessee Name:
Farm Location (Be as specific as possible: road names,
direction, milepost, etc.) : � on, noun :+,�ti , ect rrt
57R 4�a1"Z _ =-1-40
+cht' s �-, n c SR 1 a) ( /{0rn , L7o 1 _/ j a s, c
11 r. t,.; ;� t�:. •`� h� c2 �� r . , to_ r „-t e n-�-r Gn c � � <<� � r� n -� i-, .� ? a �-"
Latitude/Longitude if known: QBSP # 23--024-10-25
Design capacity of animal waste management system (Number and
type of confined animal(s) : 3 (L?a 4g;per -to - ++n+. �� _ P SAS
Average animal population on the fa (Number. and type of
animal (s) raised) : 3 ' -f er- tQ- ,.1,S, N
Year Production Began: / ASCS Tract No.:' s53
Type of Waste Management System Used: Gcyn ckp-rc�s c iOL! eo f?
5"tt _Set !f fiGtCttO'j'1 SV5ter'Yl --
Acres Available for Land Application of Waste: ti 7y -/- /�? o
Owner (s) Signature (s) : r ,D�i�i;�Cl, ti _. Date: ZA6 y
S HL12
Date:
(Randy Lewis, Serviceman)

State of North Carolina +-
Department of Environment,
Health and NaturaE Resources a
Division of Environmental Management`
James B, Hunt; Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
March 22, 1994
Buck Sholar
Rt 2 Box 263
Rose Hill NC 28458
Dear Mr. Sholar:
This is to inform you that your completed registration form required by the recently
modified nondischarge rule has been received by the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM), Water Quality Section.
On December 10, 1992 the Environmental Management Commission adopted a water
quality rule which governs animal waste management systems. The goal of the rule is for animal
operations to be managed such that animal waste is not discharged to surface waters of the state.
The rule allows animal waste systems to be "deemed permitted" if certain minimum criteria are
met (15A NCAC 2H .0217). By submitting this registration you have met one of the criteria for
being deemed permitted.
We would like to remind you that existing feedlots which meet the size thresholds listed
in the rule, and any new or expanded feedlots constructed between February 1, 1993 and
December 31, 1993 must submit a signed- -c-gification form (copy enclosed) to DEM by
December 31, 1997. New or expanded feedlots constructed after December 31, 1993 must
obtain signed certification before animals are stocked on the farm. Certification of an
approved animal waste management plan can be obtained after the Soil and Water Conservation
Commission adopts rules later this year.
We appreciate you providing us with this information. If you have any question about
the new nondischarge rule, please contact David Harding at [phone],
enc:
Sincerely,
_d A
/it. Steve Tedder, Chief
® Water Quality Section
P.O. Box 29535. Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0635 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

REGISTRATION FORM FOR ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources'
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
w
If the animal waste management system for your feedlot operation is
designed to serve• more than or equal to 100 head of cattle, 75
horses, 250 swine, 1,000 sheep, or 30,000 birds that are served.by
a liquid waste system, then this form must be filled out and mailed
by December 31, 1993 pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 (c) in order to be
deemed permitted by DEM. Please print clearly.
Farm Name: ."L.", x� -5 1 /c , r s-'I
Mailing Address:
County:
Owner(s) Name:
Manager(s) Name:
Lessee Name:
Farm Location (Be as specific as possible: road names, direction,
milepost, etc.) Air Take US 117 N to Magnolia, turn Rt. in
Magnolia onto SR 1912 (E. Sampson/Blind
Bridge Rd) , go over I--40 and 0.3 mile
- -- - later take Rt. onto SR 1921 (Hamilton `
Rd), follow SR 1921 to end. Farm entrance
on Lt. (TT=15 min.; TO=11 miles)
Latitude/Longitude if known:
Design capacity of animal waste management, system (Number and type
of confined animal (s)27 - .,t .s �,, t,
Average animal population on the farm (Number anti type of animal (s)
raised): - ILL.
Year Production Began:.,ZI2_,L ASCS Tract No.: 71 _
Type of Waste Management System Used: /40
Acres Available for Land Application o
Owner (s) Signature (s) :
E
-?, `/a /V�3"t"d e.
DATE:
-3d,'92

•
•
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. 3 / -7Z
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: '0— 3.,1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner:
-jr. --
Mailing Address: I '_n(o fose k)L• 22�453
County: CUD 1 i ( _
Integrator: idUraha E2,rrhS Phone:'
On Site Representative: �� Phone: ZS��(;0%�
Physical Address/Location: j IT7 tj 6D5e 1 h'((. Y1421pn /ci f orr _ I91(o _
rlIANY. ()n, 152It _
Type of Operation: Swine _ Z Poultry Cattle Fi/1
Design Capacity: (P Number of Animals on Site: R7-Z_
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: � 4 ° 52 43.7�Longitude: r7b° 01 Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes r No Actual Freeboard, S Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Ye or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? 5r No [SS -Qc, Pr V..
Crop(s) being utilized: _ b?,ftn 20 (A) 5
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or N&o
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes o No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or& If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes o No
Additional Comments: MIX-Ir elrD510r 04� e of W14'%CC'. 4 :P4f
t 2
Inspector Name
. 2*L==
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

r
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,,
JCEP
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality MV 112 IM7
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor YK.
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 31, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Attn: Buck Sholar
Buck Sholar Farm
256 Donald K. Outlaw Rd
Rose Hill NC 28458
C4,1* ;6
EHNR
Subject: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violation of N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and
15A NCAC 8F .0201 .
Buck Sholar Farm
Facility #: 31-157
Dupl.in County
Case #: OV 97-019
Dear Buck Sholar:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and a notice of a civil penalty assessed against
Buck Sholar in the amount of $500.00. This assessment is based upon the following facts:
Buck Shofar operates an animal operation and associated animal waste management
system in Duplin County.
As of January 1, 1997, in accordance with N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F .0201
a certified operator in responsible charge is required to operate the subject animal waste
management system.
In accordance with 15A NCAC 8F .0201(a), the owner of each animal operation having
an animal waste management system must submit a letter to the Certification Commission,
Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Technical Assistance and Certification Group, which
designates an Operator in Charge with the appropriate type of certification. This letter
must be signed by the owner and the certified operator and be submitted to the
Certification Commission by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date.
In November, 1996 and April, 1997, DWQ mailed notices to all animal waste management
facilities who had not designated an operator with the DWQ.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Buck Sholar failed to designate an appropriately certified wastewater treatment operator
in responsible charge of the subject animal waste management system, in accordance with
15A NCAC 8F .0201(a).
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that Buck Sholar violated or
failed to act in accordance with the requirements of N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F
.0201. A civil penalty of not more than $1,000 per day may be assessed against a person who.is
required but fails to designate an appropriately certified wastewater treatment operator as
required by N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.5 and 15A NCAC 8F .0500.
Based upon the above facts and conclusions of law, I hereby assess Buck Sholar a
$500.00 civil penalty for this violation of N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F .0201 pursuant
to the authority delegated to me by N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F .0201.
Please find attached another Operator in Charge designation form. Please complete this
form and return it to:
WPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If the aforementioned operator designation form is not at the above address within 30 days
of your receipt of this notice, you will be subject to further civil penalties of up to $1,000 for each
day that the operator in charge designation is not submitted. You may contact DWQ's Training
and Certification Group at [phone] for information about designating a certified operator.
Within thirty days receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will not foreclose
enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s). Please submit payment
to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
or
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is:limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment letter.
Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such
a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative

hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in dispute. You
must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and stipulation form and a
detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of -the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief/DWQ
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
OR
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must request
an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition to
the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes. You must:
File your original petition with the:
Office of Administrative Hearings
P.O. Drawer 27447
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447
and
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Richard Whisnant
Office of General Counsel
NCDENR
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611

Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter being
referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect the
penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations which
occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone],
extension 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc: I&egional.SuQeiviso w/:attachmeni—s:�7
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public Information Officer w/attachments

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT )
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST )
PERMIT NO. )
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINTSTRATI VE HEARING AND
STIFUL,-kTION OF FACTS
FILE NO.
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality
dated, gng to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of , 19—
SIGNATURE
f : ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OPERA R TI CHARGE
DESTQrNATTQN IEORM
ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:
Facility ID Number: County:
OPERATOR XN CHARGE
Home Mailing Address.
City S tate Zip
Certificate rr _ Social Security
Work Phone Horne Pb.one
Signature _ _ Date
OWNER
Mailing. Address. City
State Zip Telephone
Signature Date
Please Mail to: WPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0335 ,

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr. Division of Water Quality Wayne McDevitt
Governor Secretary
October 3, 1997
Judy Johnson Spedding
Jeff & Judy Spedding Farm
PO Box 100
Kenansville, North Carolina 28349
Dear Mrs. Spedding:
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Jeff & Judy Spedding Farm
Facility Number: 31-813
Duplin County
On September 30, 1997, staff from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
inspected your animal operation and the lagoons serving this operation. During the inspection, it was
observed, that erosion on the wall of lagoon #2 could eventually threaten the integrity of the structure. As
we discussed, this erosion should be corrected, and all bare areas on the lagoon wall should be revegetated.
We suggest that you contact your service company, local NRCS office, or Soil and Water District office for
any assistance they may be able to provide to correct this situation.
You must notify this office in writing within fourteen (14) days of the receipt of this notice, what actions
are being taken to correct this deficiency. Failure to do so may result in the facility being required to obtain
an individual non discharge permit.
Please be aware it is a violation of North Carolina General Statutes to discharge wastewat(:r to the
surface waters of the State without a permit. The Division of Water Quality has the authority to leN°y a civil
penalty of not more than $10, 000 per day per violation.
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845 • Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Do not use for Intemationai Mail (See reverse
Sont t9 t
Nu
pad plfice. State, 5 ZIP
Postage
Certified Fee
Spedal DdWwy Fee
Resdicted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt Showing to
Whore 3 Dale Delivered
Reuun Receipt Showing to Whom,
Date, 6 Aftemeek Address
TOTAL Postag 9u
r
Postmark or ate'
Z 312 636 551
US Postal Service
Receipt for Certified Mail j}
No insurance Coverage Provided.
I

Judy Johnson Spedding
October 3, 1997
Page 2
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Andy Helminger, David Holsinger, or
Brian Wrenn at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
Andrew G. Helmnnger
Environmental Specialist
cc: Harold Jones, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation
Sandra Weitzel, NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Jimmy Vinson, Brown's of Carolina, Inc..
Operations Branch
Wilmington Files
S. 4 WQS IANDYA U1-813. DEF

PO Box 100
Kcnansville, North Carolina 28349-0100
.Andrew G. Helm nger
Environmental Specialist
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Re: Jeff and Judy Spedding Farm
Facility Number: 31-813
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Helminger,
RECEIVED
OCT 2 7 1997
BY:
This letter is in response to our notice of deficiency. Our plan is to bring in top soil from
the pastures and cover the bare areas on the lagoon wall. This soil will be graded out to
fill in the eroded areas. We will also take soil samples for proper fertilization and liming
and will seed with fescue and rye grass. This operation should commence the week of
October 20, 1997. If you have any questions or comments about our plan, please call me
at 910-289-4008.

16/23/1997 14:21 910289400B SPEDDING FARMS PAGE 91
PO Box 100
Kenansville, North Carolina 28349-0100
Andrew 0. Helminger
Envirotu wntal Specialist
Statc ofNorth Carolina.
Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
WiluxiWon, NC 28405-3845
Re: Jeff and Judy Spedding Farm
Facility Number: 31-913
Duplin County
Dear 11Ir. Helminger,
This letter is in response to our notice of deficiency. Our plan is to bring in top sofa from
the pastures and cover the bare areas on the lagoon wall. This soil will be graded out to
:fill in the eroded areas. We will also take soil samples for proper f0tilization and liming
and will seed with fescue and rye grass. This operation should commence the week of
October 20, 1997. If you have any questions or comments about out plan, please call the
at 910-289-4008,

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
May 14, 1997
CCE TIFIED SAIL
RETURN RECEIP _REQUESTED
Judy Johnson
Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
PO Box 757
_ Rose Hill NC 28458
Farm Number: 31-813
Dear Judy Johnson:
AlFWAVA,
EDEHNF=1
You are hereby notified that Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296, in accordance with G.S. 143-
215.10C, must apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this
letter, your farm has thirty (30) days to submit the attached application and all supporting
documentation. In accordance with .Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session
1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by
the date specified by the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system
after the specified date. Your application must be returned within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and
other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package. The
signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location map, and
two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the application
package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any question concerning this Ietter, please call J R Joshi at [phone] extension
363 or Dave Holsinger with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
mil' A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Wilmington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 105/6 post -consumer paper

St6te of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Judy Johnson
Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
PO Box 757
Rose Hill NC 28458
AILWT4�
IDEHNR
November 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Jeff & Judy Spedding - Grower #296
Facility ID#:_381'3
Duplin County
Dear Ms. Johnson:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, IP. FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 �� An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 &7=3 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Res
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey FJUL
18 1997
(THIS FORM MAY &E PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)_
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the
Division. Please review the information for completeness and make any corrections
which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please
complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered.
Application Date: 6_ l Z r 9/
N
I. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
1. One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
h-
:1 2.
Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed;
Cn
U J
wx 3.
Two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does
,-)W
not have a CAWMP, one must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
c'> a^'q
M
for animal waste operations.
' �tI. rGENERAL INFORMATION:
�I - Farm's name: Jeff & Jud .,12edding - Qrower #296
2. Print Land Owner's name: Judy Johnson SPEOD/it/C
3. Land Qw er's atlin a dress: PO $ox-i�' /0 a
j`e V1 -
City: 4W&4fHLNC _ _ Zip: $" 2S 3V9
Telephone Number: , rftm . �910 2 Fry -1/oo l' _ /e,.►^e a.. 9f 0 Z Jr4 ie8 7 7^
4. County where farm is located: Duplin
5. Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From Magnolia. take SR 1212 toward Hwy 11. After
crossing I-40. take first right on SR 122_L_FaMlwill be at end of rogd. _.
6. Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): Jeffrey Studding
7. Lessee's / tegrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Brawn's of„Carolina rAh' .
3l - 813
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 1 of 3

III. OPERATION INFORMATION:
1. Farm No.: SA-Q- 34 - gl ',�,
2. Operation Descri tion: operation
Feeder to Finish
7920 - Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? ED yes; ®no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
Tynof wine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals TyW of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
Feeder to Finish Aq y 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
i-thC.r Tyt,c a.` L Vcstocl1 or tLAC fa.'�1: :�^,. of ArdmalsL
tolo5�'
3. Acreage cleared and available for application:-; Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP):�o�g:0
4. Number of Lagoons: ;Total Capacity: 1 balk-04*ki Cubic Feet (ft3)
Number of Storage Ponds: �_ ; Total Capacity: Cubic Feet 3
S. Is animal waste being applied on any field which has subsurface drains? ES r NO (please circle one)
6. Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity of or under the lagoon? YES or NO (please circle one)
IV. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I, JVDy -J-" ZP `.ADiA-)C9 (Land Owner's name listed in question 11.2), attest that
this application foryepf- w �✓y�� fr�/A16 XAi=h'1 (Farm name listed in question II.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this .
application are not completed aV that if l re red}p rting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as irlcp&fnle�ei� //
Signatur Date
V . MA CSE IFIC ION: complete only if different from the Land Owner)
1, (Manager's name listed in question II.6), attest that this
application for _ f V- r_,1P_k0#AAly FAW^ (Farm name listed in question II.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate d cortiplete to the best of my 1cnov-11edge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and tPhat if requ. a supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incom e .
Signature Date hila -1
THE CO D PPLICAT ON AC GE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHO E SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 2 of 3

State Of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (2/97)
Asheville Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Avery
Macon
Buncombe
Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cherokee
Polk
Clay
Rutherford
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Transylvania
Henderson
Yancey
Jackson
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Beaufort Jones
Bertie
Lenoir
Camden
Martin
Chowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotank
Currituck
Perquimans
Dare
Pitt
Gates
Tyrell
Greene
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson
Moore
Alexander
Lincoln
Bladen
Richmond
Cabarrus
Mecklenburg
Cumberland
Robeson
Catawba
Rowan
Harnett
Sampson
Cleveland
' Stanly
Hoke
Scotland
Gaston
Union
Montgomery
lredell
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alamance
Rockingham
Alleghany
Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Surry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/97 Page 3 of 3
Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
3800 Barrett Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Chatham
Nash
Durham
Northampton
Fdgecombe
Orange
Franklin
Person
Granville
Vanoe
Halifax
Wake
Johnston
Warren
Lee
Wilson
Wilmington Regional WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Brunswick New Hanover
Carteret Onslow
Columbus Pender
Duplin
P

JEFF & JUDY SPEDDING - GROWER ##296
1200 FARROW -FEEDER, 3 - 1224 FINISHING
STATE ROAD #1921 - DUPLIN COUNTY
QBSP# 23-24-15-15
DIRECTIONS: FROM MAGNOLIA, TAKE STATE ROUTE #1912 TOWARD
HIGHWAY ill. AFTER CROSSING I-40, TAKE FIRST RIGHT ON STATE ROUTE
i91921. -FARM WILL BE AT END OF ROAD.
MAILING ADDRESS: SHIPPING ADDRESS:
JEFF & JTJDY SPEDDING JEFF & JUDY SPEDDING
P.-O. BOX 757 STATE ROUTE #1921
ROSEHILL, NC 28458 MAGNOLIA, NC 28453
HOME: [phone]
303 EAST COLLEGE 57PSET • ?.O BO,C a87 ...�RSA'a`l, . I C 23?S3-asT OFFICE: [phone] - FAX: [phone]

VDi•a2.7T3 i��^v7 Ma'
#:'.=Y:1,'3.N0 SSA iMfl
.=a:s,--exZ aI:�TZ a -70-��7
C:4 a o:z (, a
S
�!a�•..e•o Ya_�F
Q"�'zja i o 9�g
a=r.ae�ST 5
a5�:�
CDT»es�Q aC.a2r_as:�c' =a,2�
2Lre i=o5 i2ool a g o ao•[t=o a —� �E r_-v `�j Bz� =e
a=enes ssel �- erre =cas '2 mc,.7
=o aD:'Enan:]CD a?ew-'.'2m �5r:Ds.;a »a:;WTa a_rzs run =o
o� tsz;sns s`c:;Z :71D=3 a�ser, Lt-V'e o a5�a gas-? D1 a� �s1t� azal;z Z-eq- Y--23s=n?:-:1
OST-e (at-) � ' va�7Dz5 azv SLeIt ?.`e rizu el '3 a=C� aq m-ZB e5'e:-Z;j IZa ia:::7C� :1a4?
SO 1o:STA70 aVZ O� �a� TL:] �ZS aq O� :]D CEDT_ :'vD P%a I 2
saau 3o t:oY��ri.c�ssDo 20 ���sns a5esD--s L-,e �L:a1�4Ea=� a�sers eL•� : o x�-D2 ED s5:sap
StSTDS TCt3 auz C-4 UcZS:'eJ2 TesOT-4T??e A* e �LL�� 'riD�'Yi (`m) � 56�'1✓u�CZS aScz�
�Lrqum t=-T LL =" ?-re onD� ?azmu L�3 ouz :.D3 ire I4� Z.:a:.a5eieEie.MLT raL',STLce=Sa sez eeDCad
��a=ap�e�taca=cnr�sccss icccr�n cie �ca�ecaes�sc�asts ese�caca x�ceor eca�^�c�: acczsa
ZT
_ •�LT� rzLiTTO�P� 30 S UMC1I
IIQStI (� -�j AllDaItr 1� .�� dstia ic` i� 5 Tv r===sZ =a e-�N
aua :O lc-x':]CD al" ?Ue.!Seg2 J1i??DL :SaDE= L:D }:c.^`-Gw? .5'10 m c d:5-2
3D ; z Zc j ;)Tr.Za=DS "ZualuG m! a VDT'zI2DT'jC»2 szs:Lv-1=ac=•C _ o .d.sza-.� D DO
=D asn ZO) :07112Z-.i T7'i ZZS'B`: =C- -;.-eL r0 `^.0Z'e
a en�vp2 :AST.`.?C2D a5c�C�5 a;S-21% !=".:DLL a5EZcDs e=sem =0 S:=5E; zDy ue7vh7rto
»D S=au-4 (Sze:! =-,Iq) suo-,zvxedaS lr'14'-i: :I : 91c7e7'SE L71$ Zu" —, ?a?nLD1T a;2
Pure SZSiLv:z�aCS ~7.:q"::+a3 =D am Aq ?'oT3i�ct �mHC"c:��+eT�Ca��D
-TaLz -p,re s_::atm-,B 5»7.n07:C= a;.;,L 5000 -40GG DZ-DN YST
P=e L 7-0 Z :)IfD l YET c� �`-en mod UDTSs T•. =D so`,El-ZvS.;D� :a_�M, •�, I-,e5 a YIc�C�
rzzsDN 96;Z ao/p;re aDTtuaS uo-rZm4zas ICD LTDs-YCsn au.:1 pu•p Oua�oSeu•^s-,� Lei :a��D-T��
=o uo TSTr:Tn a z =o p--e sp,—Vpu's;s uc; ae=aco
"aDT�DTL:CS»CD 'L5'Sap zu-z Snag= ='2t�D uv-Ld mus--a5E:rem cCS7!4 --e S-0-j
atLDCQ BD2I3 L:'23 B-:Z =03 Sv =BZSAS o--SE
YST o� =ins=nd ua:ss �s=rcJ LD-_er.=asuc�
a�nv'h5 ptm TTDS vtl-4jC:2, ..ZZON st;Z Aq ?.— e7=5-sap .'StLE:✓a=S Iem - . ZeZ v S-Y
ao �:»iDTi ae� ss f i� ►oy�5 TDr_oay
t7eaeov�ceaa=�acavaaaaesn�aes=QaGatssCnsie`eke=ateeaa=eeG�ceccteaaQaearQaaaapcFaacvca
00
�5 {•5mz :]CTDEL'1dD4; L^73cDa:.^1 �D a3'.S 95'c�rt
IF / / cVf• (St`Q .D =ate;) r.� oa�co T•�-Sa�
3�ry!rn ('DZe :]DT]EzB D :D a�l'
.ZUBPT :1013EDCI ,:.I1'7 dv= pec= Ad= asEvLd
(�. D a1ot;j
�fi1iC.d d� J — • (a... aseald) txu; 70 BZTN
Erb go apra OS1bAs= "mZ-4 SB9C�r7t Oti-
�: ��vrss3��a,"i go aoTr �t.r� a� n� =os ?vZwT�a e� : =..Zs= wavele'
SZC"�Gei`CLc=O X.gL2 'doltbTDi.:+CJI.`+.h'c.O !.Z^id ;!t`VL�t. n �.:.�'CM
t
K
a
ti.
c
i+

State of North Cc Tina
Department of Env ironm';nt,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
games B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathon B. Howes, Secretory
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
ADDENDUM
CONDITIONS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS TO CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: Ly ��ezw:�I--
Address: P� �X 7-�7 �aSc'�fJGI,/UC Z8�5`8
Name of Land Owner (print): �� 1D
Signarure (Land Owner);
Name of Technical Specialist Ce
Signature (Technical Specialis~c,
All statements below that are X4
(print):
County: A404 /J
Date: Z- 1 ,.j
technical specialist apply to the attached certirscstion:
The irritation system has not been installed or evaluated concerting nozzle size, spray pattern,
spacing, pipe size, etc. It is the resporuibiEry of the producer to obtain and operate the
System w;u`t th:- co: pore nts and to supply the required maintenance to assure that no
runoff of pollutants occurs during operation and that the waste is applied at the approved rates.
By (monrh/day/year) the producer should have an irrigation specialist, possibly
the dealer where the system was purchased, pr`pare an operation and maintenance plan for
the irrigation system so that the producer knows how to operate the equipment to meet the
non -discharge requirements.
The waste management plan for this operation is based on yields higher than what is now
recommended by l,RCS; however, these yields are obtainable under high levels of
management and the farmer has supporting documentation to justify higher nitrogen
application rates.
All of the permanent vegetation required by the waste management plan has not been
established as of the date of this certification. The producer agrees to establish the
vegetation by (month/day/year), and to provide a temporary small grain crop in
case some pumping is required prior to the establishment of the permanent vegetation.
The landowner is responsibie for notifying DF-M in writing that the stated woe's that has a compliance
date has been completed. This notification must be received by DEM within 15 days of the
compliance date(s) listed above. Please send verification of the properly completed worik to: DEti1
Planning Branch, P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, N.C. 27626.
certaddn.doc
revised: 6-15-95
P.O. 6= 29F„°.5. Rceigh. Ncrh Ccrclinc 27626-OF 15 Teiephene 919-733-7015 FAX [phone]
An :c: cl Opocr'uniIy A`"rmctive Acticn Employer SM. recyc!ec'/ 1 co. pc--con�;mer pcper

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Grower(s):
Jeff Spedding
Farm Name:
Jeff & Judy Spedding
County:
Duplin
Farm Type:
Feed -Fin Far -Feed
Farm Capacity:
3672 1200
Storage Structure:
Anaerobic Lagoon
Storage Period:
180 days
Application Method:
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. time must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, ft3, tons, etc.):
3672 animals X 985.50 gal/animal/year = 3,618,756 gallons
1200 animals X 4,015 gal/animal/year = 4,818,000 gallons
Total 8436756 gallons
Zw
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (Ibs):
3672 animals X 2.30 lbs/animallyear =
1200 animals X 6.50 Ibs/animallyear =
8,445.60 Ibs
7,800.00 Ibs
Total �jf 45.60 sbl
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
Page: 2

The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type, and surface application.
Tract
Field
SoII
Crop
Yield
Ibs N
Acres
Lbs N/Ac Lbs N
Ibs N
Time to
Type
Code
/Ac
/unit
Residual I IAc
Required
Apply
71707
2
Wo
G
3.0
50.00
110.0
--- i
! 150.0
16500.00
F-June, S-N
71707
2
GbA
G
3.7
50.00
18.0
185.0
i
3330.00
F-June, S-N
Total 128.0 1'383_ 0:00
Available N 1'6245;60]
*Difference -3�584 40?
—Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer
annuals.
•A negative number reflects the total Ibs of additional nitrogen needed to achieve yields on
acreage listed in chart. A positive number means additional acreage is required to utilize the
nitrogen produced by the farm.
NOTE:
This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
Page: 3

consider harvesting hay or silage two to tnree times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
The following legend explains the crop codes listed in the table above:
Crop -Code ro
A
Barley
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
D
Corn - Grain
E
Corn - Silage
F
Cotton
G
Fescue - Grazed
H
Fescue- Hay
I
Oats
J
Rye
K
Small Grain - Grazed
L
Small Grain - Hay
M
Grain Sorghum
N
Wheat
0
Soybean
Lbs N utilized I unit yield
1.6 Ibs N / bushel
50 Ibs N / ton
50 Ibs N / ton
1.25 ibs N / bushel
12 Ibs N / ton
0.12 lbs N / Ibs lint
50 Ibs N / ton
50 Ibs N / ton
1.3 Ibs N / bushel
2.4 ibs N / bushel
100 Ibs N / acre
133 Ibs N / acre
2.5 Ibs N / cwt
2.4 Ibs N / bushel
4.0 Ibs N / bushel
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates, The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 0.36 pounds of plant available nitrogen per animal per year in the
sludge based on the application method listed earlier for the finishing unit and 1 pound for the
sow farm.
Page: 4

If you remove the sludge every 5'years, you will have approximately 12609.60
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermudagrass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 42.03 acres of land. If you apply
the sludge to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 100.88 acres of land.
Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and land needed. Actual requirements
could vary by 25% depending on your sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and
applications.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil
Type
Crop
Application Rate
inlhr
71707
2
Wo
G
0.60
71707
2
GbA
G
0.60
Application Amount
* inches
1.00
1.00
*This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsiability of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
Page: 5

the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
Additional Comments:
Grower has additional land not listed in plan to utilize sludge nitrogen.
Page: 6

NUTRIENT MANAGEM` NT PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: `]E�ie e ` LCq 5R%-)D/A1& Fin S
Owner/Manager Agreement:
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. Uwe know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient manager_ ent plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager (if
Signature:
Name of Technical
Signature:
��. ! ■ram � •�:��
m owner):
Specialist:
Jimmy R. Vinson
Affiliation:
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Address:
P.O. Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone:
, 910) 293-2984
Date
Page: 1

m
ILI
ZONE A
ZONE X
. ........ .
... ..........

NRCS WASTE UTILIZATION
PLAN SPECIFICATIONS
I. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, tuatunade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is
prohibited.
Z. There trust be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has a notarized agreement for use
of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. if the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of a notarized agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable
prox=ty, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operatton, increase in the
number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and level of tnatiagement, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of application for other nutrients. Actual yields tuay be tiled in lieu of realistic yield tables at the
discretion of the planner.
4. Animal waste shall be applied on land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that
is eroding at more than 5 tons but less than 10 tons per acrea per }'ear proVidiing grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG Standard 393-Filter Serifs)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste :tplilic,iriun. Waste should not be applied when
there is danger of drift, from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. 1n'hen applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may he broadcast provided the
application does not occure during a season prone to flooding, (tile "Wiieither until Climate in Nat -�h Carolina" for
guidance-.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltratinn rate :uCh that runotYdces not occure off -site
or to surface waters and its a method which does not cause drift from rlic sire during nllpiication. No ponding should
occur in order to control odor and flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, duritn¢ rainfall ct'crits, or When the silllace is uOZerl.
9. Animal waste should be applied on actively growing crops in such a nnatuncr that the crop is not covered with waste
to depth that would prohibit growth. The potential for salt damage 1'r, inn ammnal WI-,te Shk.]Uld also be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crtip., oti .oils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be €field to a nniniinuin and a suitable winter cover crop
planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied n m-Q (him 30 days pt•ior to planting of a crop or
forages breaking dormancy.
it. Anv new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 sliail compiv with the flloowing: The outer perimeter of
the lard area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a ccmipunet or al4'InC farnl shall be at least 50 feet
from any residential property boundazy and from any pere;uiial stream or river ochcr than an irrigation ditch or
canal. Animal waste other than swine waste from facilities sited sin or llicr Ocuiber 1, 1995, shall not be applied
closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance may be reduced &W WateI'S that ate ❑tsr l)eretuual provided
adequate vegetative filter strips are present (See Standard 393 - Filr r Stril»).

1' RCS WASTE UTILIZATION
PLAN SPECIFICATIONS
(CONTINUED)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet from wet Is,
13. An.imal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of d%vellings ether than these (Teamed by landowner.
14, Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other propct)! acid public t�cht-c7f-tivays.
15. Animal waste sbail not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands by a discharge or by over -
spraying. Arsmal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided it has been approved as a land
applications site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste applied on grasses[ waterways shall be at agronomic rates
and in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
I6. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, u,ilct , sinks. etc., shall not be discharged into the
anirnaI waste management system.
17. A protective raver of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (laaoon embankments,
berrs, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas %vhere cousidered apprupriate. Lagoon areas should be
kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon beans and structures slicluld he inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
18. If wdrnal production at the facility is terminated, the owner is respoti.sible for obtaining and implementing a "closure
plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, psIllutikM ttrtd crnsiOn.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular ha:is to prevent breakdowns,
leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on %'it�:.
20, Ard.-nal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegttalbles and other crops for direct human consumption.
However, if animal waste is used cn crops for direct human ctmswnption it should only he applied preplant with no
further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible permanenet markers shall be installed to mark- the t(.)p and Kgtum e!evations of the temporary storage
(pu„ tping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall he managed to maintain the liquid level between
the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximutnn •t:n"a;,C VoIL1111c for waste zswrage ponds.
22, Soil tests shall be made everyyear, and a liquid vast: anaiv>is shall lie taken within 60 days of application
consistent with waste utilization plan. Poultry litter shall be tested prior to ;ipplicatio n. Soil and waste analysis
rec-ords shall be kept for five years.
Dead animals will be disposed of in a matuTer that ineets NC rc ttlatiums.

EMEERGENCY ACTION PLAN •
PHONE NU11 IBERS
DWQ 5ro - 3 ST-350 0
EMERGENCY MANAGEINfENT SYSTEM 911
SWCD
NRCS
T is plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are lealdng,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen.
faczli.+^. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A Lagoon overflow —possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump waste to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop aU flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. slake sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Rtuncl. from waste application field -actions include:
a- L—nmediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Lea-k=ge from the waste pipes and sprinkler -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restoring pumps.

D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks -possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump
back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the: extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in banger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone - 3` — % =` _ . After hours, emergency number: GI/ f - ? 3--�gtla . Your phone call
should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item
2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill,
weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken, and the
sericusness of the situation.
b. if spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number 911.
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number a 'L - L, focal SWCD office phone number
r and local MRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number
L.
4. If none of the above works, call 911 or the Sheriffis Department and explain your problem to
them and ask, that person to contact the proper agencies for you.

S. Contact the can cr of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site damage.
C--10114-1 4 t •1 r r1
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone:
6. Contact the technical specialist who cerUed the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: G7 r2c, w
b. Phone: c'fro— arc, d
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.

LAGOON�MARKER
F- I r-
FREEB('-)A.--,.)
+ -'.-)5YR/24HR STORM
IAXIMUM LEVEL
'ARY T
fINIMUM Ll(.'-! L E- V E-- L
'ERMANENT

}
SHEET 1 OF 2
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
------------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) and
180 days of temporary storage. The time required for the planned
fluid level (permanent and temporary storage) to be reached may vary
due to site conditions, weather, flushing operations, and the amount
of fresh water added to the system.
The designed temporary storage consists of 180 days storage for:
(1) waste from animals and (2) excess rainfall after evaporation. Also
included is storage for the 25 year - 24 hour storm for the location.
The volume of waste generated from a given number of animals will be
fairly constant throughout the year and from year to year, but excess
rainfall will vary from year to year. The 25 year rainfall will not
be a factor to consider in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage
volume must always be available.
A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). If the outlet pipe is not installed at the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent marker must be installed at this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain lagoon treatment depth.
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.
3. Begin temporary storage pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level
reaches the elevation 46.7 as marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -
out when the fluid level reaches elevation 44.6 . This temporary
storage, less 25 yr- 24 hr storm, contains 222971 cubic feet or
1667824 gallons.

SHEET 2 OF 2
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3
inch per hour. Refer to the waste utilization plan for further details.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. Keep a minimum of 25 feet of grass vegetated buffer around
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not pump within 200 feet of a
residence or within 100 feet of a well. Waste shall be applied in a
manner not to reach other property and public right--of-ways.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

Nlot-tality Nlana,,[:unit ivlethods
(check which method(s) arc bein-! iii-iplerricilicd)
,J Burial three feet beneath Lite surface Of the ground within 2-1 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from anv flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendc:ing at a rcndcriat�T plant licensed undo. G.S. 106-163.7
Complete incittc:ation
❑ In tlic case of dead poultry only. piacin4 iil a disposal pit of a size and*dcsi+n
approved by the Dcpartmciit of A'Triculturc
'r1 Arty method which in the profcssionaI opinion of the State Veterinarian would
ma1`c possible the salvage of -part of a dcad animal's value without endanrtc:in4
hurnan or animal health. (Writtcn approval of the Statc Vetc.inar-ian must be
attached)
Insect Control Checklist tot• Animal Opei-ations
sl,lirl t C Ilnst
Itn�rs (p C111111.411 111secis Silc S11CCIric Practiecs
—
l:illril GlItIcTs Accuniulatiun orsuiitls
0 FILISIi syslcln is dcsij;rlcti alld ehcrcuetl
surGcitauly in rcnitivc acctitinaaicti suiitls Crum
glitters as dcsil;lled.
Cl itcinove bri(long of accumuiatcti solids
discharl;c
1.:r�nuns .1116 fits Crusted Solids
01� Maintain lagoons. scaling basiiis and bits wherc
ticst tlrcethill; is apparent to Iililtiinize rile
crusting of solids to it dcllili of ito iuore 11tan G -
8 ioclics over inore Ilian 30% of surfacc.
rt:XCCIIIVC Vcrct:hive I %xilying vegcIatioll
Maiulain vt guialive c01111•01 alour' 11.111> s 1)1'
(ilowill
hlgooll5 and fuller ill) poll lltlnit:lits to pruvelll
acclililltiatioil or(iccayiiig vewativc inartCr
alung Walel's CdGC oil illipilillltillic111•S perllllcier.

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
511ur cc Cause I111711s to R1 illlize C?dul' Sill: Specific Pracliccs
F�unlslt�l(I swine produclioll Vegetative or wooded buffers;
Recommeadcd best nunlagemcm prackcs;
Gond judgrlrcul and common sense
Auimal burly surfaces
Dirly manure -covered animals
Dry floors
�Flllllr sill laces
• Wei manurc-coverell floors
Slimcd Iloors;
Walcrers localed over sluilctl floors;
[,i'_f,
Cl
rccrlcrs at high cud of solid floors;
Cl
Scrape manure buildup from nuors;
Cl
Underfloor vcuiilalion fur drying
f►fauure Collection pits
0 Urine;
Cl
Frclluclll Inallllre removal fry flush, pil recharge,
• Partial microbial decmnllositiotl
or scrape;
- --
1-I
Underfloor vcnlilaliull
- —
�Ve il,llinn cxhamt I'Mis
Volalill: gases;
Fan Inaintenmrce;
lhrsl
`
EI'licielll air Illovenlcut
Imluur srlrfaccs
Dust
M
Washdown between groups ol'animals;
�n
Fccd additives;
Cl
Fccticr covers;
Fcc1I dlaivcr-y downspout exicnllcrs to fccder
covers
Flush tanks
• Agdali(m ofrecycicil lagoon
❑
1-111sh lailk covers;
liquid while tanks are filling
❑
Iisicnd fill lines Io ircar hollom u1'1a111;S wtlll
;mil -siphon Vents
114101 alleys
0 Agilalion during waslcwater
Ci
Underfloor flush with nndcrlloor vcuti1alilnr
C()Ilvcy;lllcc
Pit ICduall"l; IIt111w;
• Agilatrllll ol'recyeled lagoon
�y
I-XICIld recharg{' hires Io Ileal. htllllllll Id' Inls v �—
'
liquid while Ails arc filling
with ;rill kill] lun veins
1.II1 �I;lUu111
Agilalion drlring sump In111:
Cl
sulrlll I;nik covers --- — _ - —
filling and and drawllown
Outside drain cullediun
Agilalion (luring wastewater
CI
flux covers
or }Imclion 1111KCS
Conveyance
AN10C - November 11, HIM, Page 3

Snurcc Canso BMI's to Mirtimize Odrnr Site Specific Practices
Cttd of drainpipes at • Agitation daring waslcwater Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
iagoun conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lal;oou surraces a Volatile gas emissions; �� Proper lagoon liquid caliaciiy;
• Biological mixing; Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agilaticar Minimum surface area-lo-volume ratio;
Mitniuutns agilaliotn wlicn,pumping;
Mechanical aeration;
Proveri biological adclilives
Irrigation sprinkler 0 high presswc agitation; Irrigate on dry days wills little or ton ►vied;
nozzles 0 Wind drill
Minimum rccouuncudctl operalinl, pressure;
]' Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
C1 Pump from second-slagc lagoon
Simage Conk or basin 0 11arlial microbial decomposition; ❑ I1;HIour or Iuidluvel loading;
surface a Mixing while filling; ❑ 'tank eovcrs;
• Agitation when cntnptyinng ❑ Basin surface orals of solids;
Li Proven biological additives or oxidants
Sctlliug basin surface 0 Partial microbial decomposition; Extend drainpipe outlets underimab liquid
• Mixing While filling; level;
• Agitation when emptying ❑ Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge • Agitation when sprcadilig; Cl Soil injection cif slurry/sludges;
sprcmlcr outlets Volatile gas emissions Cl Waslt'residual mamtrc from spreader after use;
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered mamn-c, • Volatile gas emissions While . O Soil injeclion Ofstill ry/sludges -
slurry or sludge on field drying 11 Soil incorporation ►vithiu d1l'hrs.;
sin tacos
11 Spread in Min uniform I;ryct;ti liar rapid drying;
171 Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals 0 Carcass decomposition 70 Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead wilmal dispos;nl Carcass deeounposilion Cl Complcae covering of carcasses in burial pits;
pits
Cl Proper localiatrlcnnslruclion nfdispusal Ails
Incinrclatuns lucontplele combuslinIII F1 Secondary stack burners
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 4

$nurcc Cuuse 11M1's to Minimize 011111• YSilc Sperilic l'rarlires
Standing ►valer around do Improper drainage.- _ , Grade and landscape such Mal waler drains -
lacilitics Microbial decomposition or away fiant facilities
urgaaic ntaller
Manure Irackcil omo • Poorly mainlanled access roads �l Farm access road manlmmuce
pohlic roads Iiom firm R
access
Addhimal Inrormalion : Available From :
Swine M:auirc Management ; 0200 INIMIMP Packet NCSI I. Cuumy I:xlensiaa Ccidcr
S►vinc Production I -arm Polenlial Odor Sources and licmedics ; til3AE Fact Sheet NCSI 1- IIAI:
Swine Produclion Facilily Manure Managcmcul: I'll Rccllarge - Lagoun'I'rcatmeut ; 1313A1s 128-88 NCSI I - IIAV.
Swine Noducliun Facilily Manure Management: Uuderiloor Flush - Lagoon'I'matmem ; EIJAE 129-88 NC:SII - IIAI:
Lagoon Dcsign :uul Managelvem Air Livestock Mamure'1'rcalmunt and Sluragc; I,-IIAI- 103-83 NCSII - IIAI:
Caiibr:niun or Manurc aad waste►valer Applicalion Equipment ; FAME 1 acl Shcet NCSI1 - IIA I:
Conlrollinl; Odors hom Swine llmldings; PIII-33 NCStI - Swiuc l:alcnsion
l:uvironmental Assurance Program ; NPi'C Manual NC Turk Producers Assoc
Opliiats r«r Alanaging Oderr; a rep.nt Iroul the Swine Odor Task Force NCSU Agri Com muicalions
Nuisance C:oncums is Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies ; PHO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extcasilm
AN-l()(. - 1 ovemlwr 11. 1996. I'age 5

707
I, wl,vj} 4",
Lo
v
In 'Ir
Fj-p -z,
.2 p_iG'- .^r':. # r,r`i•%.?rl _.T ,i� Fl •,i.a (lr�i:t e��oyrli'i I 0.1
Dw
_k Im
wl A
�jf
!,v.. All
17 71
97
zy� At w j
Zk ,Vl
V, yA"I
rV
- RN N1
i 17
_Nl
Th
.17
..... . . . . . . . .
IR,
� —tj
ft— T
IN.• rq
1A
t pr+k 'l; 4:j 4 'tt "� � `�` 1r-', J!�"�,r��'tF :� Y,'1E•rt:9�fyvt }-�'t� �.�•,,�.n:i� � :', ' ;, n ���lv'!K'' �i
-

O r .� �,f .f rw� :'e .r,- ,:• -.c ;,tips f:_r` -Sys_' [w.• {.k+" .tir-=� �._ {i'�
c•, �. ,: r r-.:•1 ' '.o _9�'•� _ `'�S�}. p•g4�r - '4 ! - 5 +[.� Y• 'i' y L i
f �T w:E1
• , i� r-' >• -f a_{ 4l' y yg�� r`- Y as �.4 K ti'•'y • .� `� i
p f ry •_ p • �
C. +' 1 5 tt't �•• c+M.E c ta.:t'L f. 5• 1 f ',� . i'
!� 1 '. �y'�,,(�rY}• '�:, C= :1 .� '��;:_�"y?`f' _ �qt. r� _L�{ i�.�t i��� _yF .r�, ,+,1,`l��ay., ��t �s•S 1 �`�9
1 ' `�•f ¢j{J` 4 • •. �•.. . ,�r1);j��i3 f y �: �� .. c ,q A Gr• �� � '�, "�'��u � � ���'3 �t�•��i�•''%f 'lry' �F•Fu:-.�.`" , i'r�n I .���N cer�'�i���''�i. `} -t' �• .1{ _C U
feZ, I',{t of ����'^%�}':r F;7 �� [ �4{: s r y-tt �RL+'t_��': {ac. fa .��'.._ s'..1..v, itf� h';'sa; `i1 �CtuX j•.zy`�!° w .i r
/I.�' - �, r �� •: J S �.4:s, C,}� _.. __.', �r 45 �
� - i•_ f "- _ •r �_G 5 •..�„ � r� �.,, . !r .�., i 5. a r '•
.il•r f� ►, �. E,r7 €. IR-e7 'k`' t e.f,,, „'r �' y r s
i '•�.f": `--�{ !r( 1 it "ti4 •rlt• .•�., .� .�!{ _L v, s. .- E� 1.n,r.^Y ti ,. -" :,r :3•sr'I�Y. ("a.• ►3" „�- r
�'- `� •+ :5 ,' �; a• r �r 'C
J `')• +v; . l± � ram! �r'.'4- f•+ tiw" • # �'.t-+r�k ''rJ'' - ;[ � - t y� r.:.�. �J.�Jr-r':,K,.^.i:,: r' + .r.'� s
��n /.,l tir'r j�yy l.'�klyrr. ,l/ r. r h r,• q'L°i 1, r j; ;`..y r ':
��V'•� 4 R�'ir
wfl_ -sr�; •• •iFi `1 �. 7f.�i'-�i.'r''r'�.5, =,..e' �r•�.. wA;�R'}
••r �", ��;,--r:".� ,,,.,. •�,'-„ `�;{�t,?l ���'�'` :..,,.. s`�r:, F=.f`� .� �ta' :I$� �,:k I r,.'.o-' • s� 'ti7"�.. ay_ • a.� �-�� •,w, ;,�i, �'
._ �,, -` • ''�5-'.\�;.,i 1 :S"� u t '7*� n r -w. i ����'q (.r':,%► r „;:,d ff�:j '•-.1..,' •' ..- :� ��. .f r �i �at.
i . �r�S�'r+ ,�:5:��.'- \.-�n,•'.� r'�., rj sY.;' k� 4,%lz-.ly4jd nfS'w'f.:� E '^•�.{i• [{"S '+yam• � rt��irT,f.- r'� ��<•iYs •.r4` 'i1i Ty:!
f let rv. :k'rli � Cr . 1' `t: •^z, y.fi .;�s 4,�, �r+l �-r)•�;!•w•sJFi ti •. E 'i' �?'�, • 1� 7.J:�,� f•"^` ;.•=..;• .;.�' „+�, _°;;.vs-., r•"•::� +` ' � .T� :�� � ��! .; }1�
: L%� � '•_�,�..• .• i� ��� � t� � �' _ ;F . . a 'r ��' ry � r,� � �' �F �k; ��tir. � � "#��.•�i,'':, `�{R-�'., tit:;.P:_ �� .d ei 'C�:
`�� x�•�;'i�> v� t �?+ #' �1.` y�•f��c,�l x �1�ay� •�� � f,,,j�.. t,i�r,��. `�'�r�l.r.� +,�!��J �7y �y�, zr.'r, ,�, Ct.�,�`if �t�
Cf `6. "� .:fl: `' „+ rr - e: ,,..� ry +•t ' 'O -;-
-. '1 ,/�k' -N fiC_ti_.� ti P � ° `'• 1 k y ti- c r ,r !_o4z i . - . 2 't i ,ter �,i} +' p r T 7
t- i ei ¢,' rM -r 3 p•.. Y k+
r T rF ��'�• `�,'fit, Tl�r.•,y, Ak
�yy[,.� i
.`F',� ;(!.�'. "`� r j �Y �+y:'�r •* _'I•' ; ' -c `+' •a ` .l sS+J j.'�'i,'� f . •r o!;\°J1.!�%ti,*"•,. 41. ?:,'4 4p]n <��'i' - -t. E?1
_r,� 1` �1;�' f �''f'+J �l•r. �.y i¢� �y� 5- Iz �• ��`.�t' _ _ `�i�,f. h1-y � r+ .� � } ....
- ri- •� }� ',r- I,
eNr'�I t'. r' .#f. 't-_. 4t�
�, ,•�f'4 , G, .•r4 :, -; t�.; t Fr�?1��� Q "` f t-' : ` f �i 3g Z ` ' f°; f•, fy l .
{ r 'tw �jf r �' �• 'r3r'r1 R� Q` ' �-q '� �'f �; , { '� r a � i �� 'fti� ` ` rw,! C r� r r s�'�pi +�.
exr �`• • rl !"�F y
+p !fi'� t ?.Z,��,,�yi+ %- �"':I!:•s V1 �r , t�.+t •.- ,Wit: 1`,r ,..� lfl aY �'r' '" ,,t� 1'' '71�,f[' ,' ttr- r r;. •f
e r�il`FLr1'6..r�•wa � :' ._ r or ,2 r.. tiu {s:' "-i•
l, - {�J• lfi y
ii-��� �~ 1. "-�I�-big M�� «.��. 'r� ` y....w '�f > � •5� E_ rf G �i r. � 7.
9.r ri' �j�,:T s�:n+• c� ��� yl i � a4 _ Xi �•S�,st.Y' -��' t� � 4r� '� �i' -31 =• e�'i�:
3
4 :'i-.:4.z i .��Y',.��•( .13 Y! •� � t .'€y.fF.� r a�:E'� , t
9,1V
xi 11.1 f ►` t►r-y..�. �` � f t {* _ -
- � +1r Yti+'T ,�, vt-l:: ,� _., +� r .. ` `--'y'i ,•+P�r .�[-- irt•rti,� .�CC4.• 1��,91. + 1
V •_KGF �., S. r, ipw4
y. f''Y.' Q f�i �Ei •r V'r.L?t(.11} ��_1 r b,�`71_ '
I t I ma
0#�% ,x� 4ri yP
` , { !. Wit• �E..r?'7yd�,y��.ir=�..A�. R �4:, ,'` ,�a�` � j �. $, l � ��'�r" } � �r7����-,�e
..S • #�• • I �r. '�lh� '#j r� � ,� �i � .€7�a�� ��,, �a� � .:, i � a X�� f� f �'h-'k`'
_ `r��, T% w4kSa� � " 4 � - i{.,' a "`��j}� Oy�•''n �=•rtiT�,r�ra5 , ��'�r j
{I r � . �� .�'�i, 3'}}�1 �Y: i{ � 3 r � �..J, t4V�ti,'. , .R.� i- � i�� + �- ��'1�; %•�i•<E �`i ,�� ;`�.'- L.
40
Ci
L- '+,'' , /.L ! - ,:d d-'<�•�*ti'•r.;• z'�,•
� �4,, �'�?]r f!� f i5 r y � -t�� t +;, � �� �. ` �- `-- -^_. � � ., A'.� �,\ a P1 �'.t �' '�" ` {� � }r 'y � 4� +� ��A:; •�: =r� l' � t' �[ 5
If''t ts'i 1 le ��.{� .. \ r� r` (iiA �J , � rs�a. �' �-�X'" dLi.i'r �s+(,`x�i � •'r .
-� it fit.^,1 't/ 1yr. ;� LL•�� i1� f1 t Y` t- 1,l 'i r ••.n.�,[t�, i i
i { l�
r' ', *€ il ,\ at r.p
3--'
Z7f k ti!.'i ti-•rah '>yl,�r_ f., 'i 4"-, +i .r cry'.,.«.
1•.li ••.+;'J�-1�15 �. •,NY k� .,�.� f�, 1, f.�a (� ? �. "`-I ��s ;C �+.�,.. f. •_I:
-� < t ¢ rf3•k � ?I .tir icy ( �• �- w � � � s � a r, ' a{ � 1,r
f r rs �, , �r , `, , riy t S ' - f yJ `� 1 _ ra, t �€ � ' ti ��" �£" ��>• � C �'�r •' '. .��w L
�xe;y . l.b 4 g' 'S!•ri .' 1 l \ .. � .� r y-- 4 t s.�ti. ._ �%�i - -i � � , y •�q
' •s 5Y : '}. .t - s�x,�. .: [ Et r' `-.1 � - s.F �`'7t .1�L i..• is =. �'�,,rV-; �k� t ,{+-} ry., •., { .2
't{.p• '37 {� l r - r.; f f•']' � •i S ,t l';. >• ( �%! _ .t9'. �'. ;F[ftjEr .�.- -v
1�}y: ^� ,•r: i r4� �,� Et � �h, ".f rs y'•f.ji f� 1 �-- - } - �"•;,. . ,..�: 7�1.,� +. P
1(}i) :4e � l�' Z, , ' � f�'1h' s�}' � r :E) ( s � � L 7s' d �. r � �t +' ��• ,r���.
'y}f' ire s r -;�} ti r,�h ! ,1 � �_ .a.) � .. ,i � � 2 6-' r y •� �t
' 1 �t"I,�• is'a�V, 1 1� �= �i �rs4 r, ,i 1 . '� } -+ 1r - �?,r-. Ly'+:'l� .�`
# f. 2et9r•r/. "L t +' ki f w'-7+ l,�, �4�F' . 'f _ - r s r, r`` i 1 -� f 1g
.a r! �, :�Lt`�;�I i;E^:k �r +k� f } .r�'`-`li:.t:r. s. :� �� r•���. .1k��4�yr`.•�•`�4,�{.i�i.`r`-►e.
-,�•R�/' - ,rt'fy7 3,�..•1':• �+r�4\ � ' �••S-_�r�`e 'S Y 1� � ,. �jc. a•��{t T 1`t.:
�f+'-s ' t� S y +3. ! x, �ti.'.'ri '-r. J.`e'Y.;.�"�`7ti- - — — -- 1 a t. ,e ,(4�- 5- r�:-•S,. �3-. -lye, .x
-La'ii_J,fia�� yp{ }r.,•,' �` tiC {,_., .* -';, ��" -, < .'+ • r i . •- �'µ'� .!� �,! G .<`F4
r j ' ��;•' . 1 T i IN i-
1r �'F+ Tir/�� 5� � : �-Y . � 5�"?+ � � i �r., ' y; •:� • �^ .t ��'. �'_ S.�Y S {• y ' r, 4i ... ��� �• y - 9 S `�' _.'.��
}�•'1.Ct!-r,y.�,r. 1 r y`r, S pl}. , ( 'j' s .� ; '1•r.r ftz! 'tr �. f,r)f � .. - . �'i,'' S �',��,' ..
���;. .x 'trylf:.�•�[{.`{v-i., I�t'�F'• - r.P-��'�1' r9r;y _e
- - � �T`t 1 ' - a-_r , tom: ai ,�,�r•;, ��e,�',r''y, '4' - E �.i .' � ,,.� }
r! 4 F L•5 i �I
Ll