310787_HISTORICAL_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA ..�
Department of Environmental Qual

Y
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
H&C31-787
1i1crrsha11 Phillips
903 Wtircls Bridge R41
Warsaw, NC 28398
03-21-2006
910- 290-0111
RECEIVED I DENR I DWQ
AQUIFFRPRnTFrTnN SFCTl0N
APR 0 3 2009
This plan has been developed by:
Bill Thomas
NR CS
PO Box 219
Kenansville, NC 28349
910-296-2193
C3evelopar Signature f j.
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only APB 1 4 ZO
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
IV to management that are included with this plan.
i
Signature Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications ol'the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water.
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
Technical Specialist Signature
3 /A I le �-
Date
.....................--------------------------------------- ---- .....----...--- - ---- --...
65,6-45 Database Version _1.1 Datc Printed: 03-21-2006
Cover Pace i

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S5
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid waste generated 678,432 gals/year by a 3,552 animal
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste storage
capacities of approximately 180 days,
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
1563
Incorporated
2684
Injected
2955
Irrigated
1698
Max. Avail,
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
1,698
3539
-1,841
1,413,784
-735,352
Year 2
1,698
4576
-2,878
1,828,013
-1,149,581
.o[c: .....---•--Insource -SS .m....eans ....sta....n.da. r.d ......source......V.•m..----eans-..-..---userdef----•-ined-----..source......-------------------------- .-----------------------------------
\ ID.
* Mav A%ailable PAN' is calculated on the basis of the actual application melhod(s) identified in the plan for this source.
683645 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-21-2006 Source Pa�,e Page 1 of 1

Narrative
Pinks l &- 2 on tract 3128 are not requied to meet th nutrient budget. but can be used if needed.
............................................................................................................................................ ...............
O> 364i Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 03-21-2006 Narrative Paine Pa,e 1 of 1

The table shorn below pro -ides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary l; E
-Tract
field
Acres
Unab
.Icr/IL-:
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Scrics
Crop Sequence
RYE
1(,2
1
2.00
11.80
NiA
1301111eau
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
wheat, Grain
15 bu,
Soybeans, ManLnCd, Double Crop
25 bu.
1162
A
1,00
3.50
NIA
Bonneau
Com, Grain
85 bu,
wheat Grain
15 bu.
Soybeans, Manured. Double Drop
25 bu.
1462
t3
2,00
1.60
NIA
Bonneau
Corn, Grain
S5 bu.
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
Sovbeans, ManLned, Double Crop
25 bu.
1162
Pk of
8.00
7.48
NIA
Ronneau
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
%l`heat. Grain
45 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, DoLible Crop
25 bu.
3'_18
PI
8.00
(;A
NIA
ALltl-yville
Con,, Grain
85 bu,
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, DOLINC Crop
25 bu.
3218
P2
8.00
U
NIA
Autryville
Corn, Grail,
85 bu.
Wheat, Grain
15 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
PLAN TOTALS. 32.00 28.18
LI
Potenliu! Leaching
Techrriced Grridunce
Loin potential to contribute to 5olLIble
None
< 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
Nfokicrate potential to contribute to soluble
NUIriCnt ManagCntem (590) Should be planned.
>�2LC
null'ICFkI IL'aChinL below the rU6L ZI,n C.
<= Il)
z
I ligh pOtenual to COcuribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) Shoold be planncLI. Other consm ition practices that improve Lhe Soils
nutrient 10:16i0g bell+% tiie root zone.
available water holdim.' CaPU61\. and impruce nutrient uSC elficiCncy Sholifkl be ComidCrCLI.
t)
lizumples are Car er Crops (340) to scavenge uutrients. Sod-BaNCLI Rotatilons (3_'8), i,one- i-erm
No -"fill (77S), and edge-ofdicld practices such as 1=ilter Strip; {393) and Riparian Turest 131if fers
(391).
6S3, 64; Database Verswn _.I
NOTE: Svmbol * means user entered data.
Date 111S111cL1 1,21 2000
L
�F! /rCS Pine Pace 1 01 1
i��

The Waste Utilization table shown belo", surnmarizes the waste utilization plan for (his operation. This plats piovldes an estimate of lllC Ilt1I11bCr of aCrCS oI Crt)pland needed to 11SC
the nutrients briny pluduced. The plats requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be gown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timim-, of -applications io
maximize nulricnt uplake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and all estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure orother hy-produc(s,
commercial fer(ilizer and residua] from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total mantire applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adecittately provides
fi)r the utilization of -the manure generated by the operation.
WaSIC 111dizatiun 'fable
Year 1
Tract
field
Source
11)
Soil Series
'f(Ital
Acrc,
l Ise.
Acres
Crop
RYI:
Applic.
Period
Nitro on
PA
Nutrient
Keq'd
(Ibs/A)
Conlnt.
Fert_
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(INJA)
Applic.
Method
'\,I:Ennli
PA
NmricntA
pptied
(Ibs1A)
Liquid
hlanureA
pplied i
(acre)
solid
»anurc
Applied
(acre►
Liquid
%larture
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
ti
IN
N
N
1000
galrA
rnn,
I(H)ti'ids
tons
1402
1
ti5
BOMICau
2.00
1.80
Corn, (it ain
85 hu-
2/15-6/30
104
0
20
h'rig.
84
33.55
0.00
60.40
0.00
1462
1
ti5
IlonlICaU
2.00
1.80
Wheat, Grain
45 hu.
9/1-4/30
104
0
0
brig.
42
I6.62
0.00
29.91
0A0
1462
A
Si
HOMICatl
4.041
3.50
Corn, (iraill
9511u.
2/15-6/30
104
0
20
Inig.
84
33.55
0.00
117.44
0.00
1402
A
s5
1111ancau
4.001
3.5a
Wheat, Grain
45 bu-
9/1.4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.62
0.00
59.10
0-00
1462
13
S5
nnoncau
2.4m
1.00
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
2115-6110
104
0
20
Irrig.
94
33.55
41.00
53.69
0.00
1462
It
S5
lluuneau
2.00
1.00
Wheal, Grain
45 hu.
9/1-4130
104
0
0
111'i_
42
16.G?
(Lilt)
26.591
0.00
1462
Pilot
S5
ISonncau
8.00
7.49
('urn. Grain
85 hu.
2/1 5-0130
IN
0
20
Irrig-
X4
33.55
omo
250.9X
0.00
1402
Pivot
S5
11onncau
X 00
7.4X
Wheal, Grain
45 bu.
911-4/30
104
0
0
In io.
42
ur.62
0,00
124.29
0.00
3218
PI
S5
Auny%illc
8.00
6.')0
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
2/15-0/30
104
0
20
Inig,
84
33,55
0.C(
231.52
0.00
3218
I'1
Si
Ault yvrllc
9.00
6.90
Wheal, Grain
45 hu_
9/1-4110
104
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.02
().ill)
114. (q,j
0.00
321X
P2
ti5
Autryvillc
8d10
6.90
Con), Grain
85 bu.
2/15-6130
104
0
20
Inig.
Zia
33.55
0.00
23I.52
0.00
321X
I'2
S5
Au;ryvillc
8.00
6.90
Wheat, Grain
45hu.
9/4-4/30
104
{)
0
brig.
42
16.62
WOO
114,00
0.00
683645 Database Version 3.1 I)ate Printed: 3/21/2006 %VOT Page Page 1 of3

11'asle Utililf—ton 'Fable
Year 1
`tlrugCil
t Onim.
ties.
Ntarnlre
I_i()uld
Solid
Liquid
Sulld
PA
Fort.
(lbs/A)
NA
%IanureA
'\{auuIC
j%ianurC
Manure
Nutrient
NuIrient
\turientA
pplied
:applied
Applied
Applied
Kcy'd
Applied
pplicd
(acre)
(acre)
IField)
(Field)
(Ibs/A)
(IbslA)
(IhsiA)
tiuurcc
nial
list.
Applic.
Applic.
1000
Tram
Picic;
IU
-nilSeries
Acres
Acres
('rap
R}').
Pcriad
N
N
Y
Method
N
-, IiA
Tons
Iilotteals
tuns
'Total Applied. S000 gallons
1,413.78
,IL(Ital I'ruduccd, IO1)t)
078-43
Balance, IOOIIgalluns
-735.33.`
Iotal Applied, wns
;; u,;
O.Oo
Tntat Prndnred, n,ns
="1;£
O.on
balance. Ions
- --"'r'
0.D
Y#
Notcs: 1. In the tract column, —symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
683645 1)alahasr Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/21/2006 WLJT Page Page 2 of 3

1Wastc illilizaLIOtl 'fable
Year 2
Traci
Field
Inoue
111
Soil Series
Cutak
Acres
Usc.
Acres
Crup
RYI{
Applic.
Period
Nitrugen
PA
Nulrient
Rcy'd
ObVA)
Comm.
Fert.
\lurricnl
Applied
(Ihs/A)
ties.
(lbs/A)
Applic-
\ielluld
iManury
PA
NuuicnrA
pplied
Oh -JAI
Liquid
\1.mureA
pplicd
{acre►
Solid
\Ianvue
Applied
(acre)
I iyuid
Manure
Applied
{Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1001
,aI�A
'l nni
1010 gals
tuns
1462
1
S5
Bonncau
2.00
1.8(1
W111;a1,( rain
45hu.
9/1-4130
104
0
1 0
Irrigg.
1 6'
24.93
0,00
44.87
0.00
1402
1
Si
Bonncau
2.00
1.80
5uybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu-
411 9/15
IUD
0
0
]n-ig.
100
39.94
0.00
71.90
0.00
1462
A
S5
1lunaeau
4.00
3.50
Wheat, Grain
45 hug
911-4130
104
0
0
brig.
62
24.93
(Lull
57.2;
0.00
1462
A
ti5
konrlcau
4.00
3.50
Soybeans, Mamired, Double Crop
25 hu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
It
100
3').94
0.410
139.90
000
1402
11
S5
Bonneau
2.00
1.60
Wheat, Grain
45 bcr.
911-4130
104
0
0
hrig.
(12
24.93
0 O11
39.4\
0,00
1402
H
S3
13onIlea u
2.00
1,60
Soybeans, MBMAred, DOLIMC (-fop
25 hu.
411-9115
100 1
0
0
Irrig.
100
3,).94
0.00
63.91
0.0
1462
Pivot
ti5
Itnsmeau
SAW
7.43
Whcat, (irain
45 bu.
WI -4/30
10;
0
0
1:rig.
62
24.93
(l.l80
196.44
0.00
1402
Pivot
S5
14onneau
8.00
7.49
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
4/1 JVI5
100
0
0
l ig.
100
39.I).4
(1.011
291.78
0.00
321H
PI
S5
Auu'yvillc
8.00
6.90
Wheat, (iraill
45bu.
911-4130
104
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.93
0.00
171.98
0.00
321X
PI
Si
Auuyville
8.00
6.90
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 hu.
411-1)/1?
100
0
0
hrig.
100
39.94
0MO
275.01
0.00
321N
112
S5
Aulryville
X.(10
6.90
Wheat, Clain
45 hu.
WI-4130
104
0
0
brig.
62
24.031
0.00
171 AK
0-O0
3_21r,
1,2
ti5
Auuyvillc
XA0
6.90
Suyhcarts, Manurcd, DOU111C Crop
25 hu.
411-9lI5
10O
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.9;
0.00
275,61
0DO
total Apphcd, IOW _gallon
1,828.01
= t w
� -QE
'total Produced. 1000 �-,allun,
67R.43
iwance, 1t100 -alluns
-1,149.59
- -t.r !
-total Apphed.lons
'- _
0.00
Total Produced, Ions
0L00
0alarscc. tons
U.00
Notes: I - In the tract column, - Symbol means )cased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol " means user entered data.
683045 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/21/2006
WUT Page Page 3 of 3

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying .waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lisis the maxintum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
1462
1
Bonneau
0.60
1.0
1462
A
Botuteau
0.60
1.0
1462
B
Bonneau
0.60
1.0
1462
Pivot
Bonneau
0.60
1.0
3218
P 1
Autryville
0.60
1.0
3218
P2
Autryville
0.60
1.0
6S 3645 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/21/2006 IAF Page Page I of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source.
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludgy--;e contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients includinu� phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally eery high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites Hurst first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. ideally. effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. if this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes,
phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
Ib/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gallac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Nursery Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 v«
150
13.16
9.0-4
19.08
2TI z
Hay G ton R.Y.1--.
300
26,32
4.52
9.03
13.56
soybean -10 bL1
160
1.404
s.aa
16,95
25.43
6S3645 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-21-2006 Sludge Paue Paue 1 of

Tile Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding_ pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. [f available storage capacity is negative.
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the deskgin story=ze vohtme of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste u6iization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
ISwineNUrsery Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
28
1
2
i02
1
3
173
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
6
ISO
1
7
149
1
8
1is
l
9
151
l
10
180
t
I
180
1
12
180
2
1
180
2
2
180
2
3
180
2
4
ISO
2
5
ISO
2
6
ISO
2
7
180
2
8
ISO
2
9
180
2
10
149
2
11
119
2
12
ss
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end ol•cacti month.
..................... ................................. ..................... ...................... ...................... . ........................
683645 Database Version 3.1 Date Printc& 03-21-2006 Capacity Pw�e Pay e 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
.animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. if the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
...............................................................................................................................................................
GS 3Gi5 Database Version =.1 Date Printed: 1:21:2006 Specification Pa+gz l

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen. .
9. .animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
................_......----......---........-----.. _....... _........---........---.......----------..........._.......----........--
6S36-15 Database Version 3.I Date Printed: 3.121'2006 Specification Noe 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
IS. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
............................................... ................. ........................................... ...... . ...........................
683645 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 312 L2006 Specification Page

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1. A, B , P 1, P2, Pivot
Corn: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leaching
In the Coastal Plain, com is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
Populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to fseld(s): 1, A, B , P 1, P2, Pivot
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 112" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbslacre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining
N should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type.
Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat,
Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
..... ................ ...--------- .. ........ ....... .......................... ...
r118_64i Database Version A pate Printed: 03-71-2006 Crop Note Pa�,,e Paoe 1 of 2

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, A, B , Pl. P2, Pivot
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medium leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Pail. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbslacre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
.............11.............................................................................. ..........
os364; Database Version 3.1 Date Primed: 03-21-2006 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 2

''' State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Marshall H. Phillips
M & C Nursery
903 Wards Bridge Road
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear Marshall H. Phillips:
A/ • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 4, 2002
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
M & C Nursery
Facility Number 31-787
Duplin County
A letter dated January 15, 1999 was sent to advise you about concerns associated with Certified Animal
Waste Management Plans and the method by which the irrigated acres within the plans were calculated. Only
the acres that are wetted can be credited in the waste management plan as receiving waste application. Any
acreage within the plan that can not be reached by waste application equipment can not be used as part of your
plan.
An evaluation by Brian Wrenn on 7/23/99 was made to review the actual number of acres at your facility
that receive animal waste during land application. The evaluation of your facility has yielded one of the
following two results as indicated by the box marked with an "X".
Category 1:
The evaluation of your facility could not be completed due to a lack of information. Please
contact your Technical Specialist to assist in providing Stoney Mathis the necessary
information to potentially exempt your facility from undergoing a complete wettable acre
determination. Please submit this information to Stoney Mathis, at 127 Cardinal Drive
Extension, Wilmington, NC 28405-3845, within in 90 days of the receipt of this letter. If you
have any questions please contact Stoney Mathis at [phone]. If within 90 days you
are unable to provide Stoney Mathis with the information you are automatically
required to complete a Wettable Acre Determination as described by Category 2
below, within 180 days of receipt of this letter.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Category 2:
❑ Your facility has been identified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
as a facility that may have overestimated the number of acres actually receiving animal
waste. Therefore, some or all of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates
set in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated Technical Specialist to have him
or her conduct a Wettable Acre Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must
be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to conduct
Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialist with the N.C. Cooperative Extension
Service, the Soil and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and the Division of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System must be made and
the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be returned to DWQ within the next
180 days. If the needed modifications are not made and if the form is not returned within the
required time, DWQ will be forced to take appropriate enforcement actions to bring this facility
into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty assessments, permit revocation,
and/or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of the attached Wettable
Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the address listed on the form. Please
note that both the owner and the Technical Specialist must sign the certification. A copy of all
the Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste Utilization Plan
must be kept at your facility. DWQ and the Division of Soil & Water Conservation Staff will
review all documentation during their annual visit of your facility. An additional copy must by
kept on file at the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office. Please note that if you install
or modify your irrigation system, a designated irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer
must also sign the Wettable Acre Determination Certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sonya Avant of our
Central Office staff at [phone] ext. 571.
SincereletJ.
ory
, Ph.D.
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Carroll's Foods, Inc.

Wettable Acres Determination Certification
Name of Facility: Facility Number:--
Owner(s) Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address:
By signing this form, the facility owner and Technical Specialist acknowledge the completion of the
Wettable Acres Determination. All necessary Wettable Acre Determination Field Data Sheets and
calculations were completed to conduct a Wettable Acre Determination. The facility's Waste
Utilization Plan has been amended as necessary to reflect actual wetted acreage. A copy of all
worksheets, calculations, and other Wettable Acres Determination documents, along with the
applicable Waste Utilization Plan and Wettable Acre Determination Certification will be filed with
the local Soil and Water Conservation District. A copy will also be kept on site with the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan. Any future modifications must be approved by a technical
specialist and filed with the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. If any
modifications to the existing irrigation system or any new irrigation equipment was required to
adequately address the waste management needs of this facility, an Irrigation Specialist or
Professional Engineer has certified the design and installation below.
Owner Name:
Owner Signature:
Technical Specialist Name:
Technical Specialist Signature: Date:
If assisted by an Irrigation Specialist or Professional Engineer please read and sign below:
Animal waste application equipment has been designed or modified to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan and according to NRCS Standards. Animal waste
application equipment has been installed according to NRCS Standards and is ready for use.
Irrigation Specialist/PE Name:
Irrigation Specialist/PE Signature:
Submit this form to:
Attn: Sonya Avant
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Date:
WADC - 7/99

State of North Carotin
Department of Enviro t
and Natural Resource
JUL
yy y 13 2001
Michael F. Easley, Governor . 6
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary `-'-_.-___'
Kerr T. Stevens, Director ��
July 2, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT RE UESTED
Marshall H. Phillips
M & C Nursery
903 Wards Bridge Road
Warsaw NC 28398
i •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
M &_C Nursery
Facility Number 31-787
Duplin County
Dear Marshall H. Phillips:
A letter dated January 15, 1999 was sent to advise you about concerns associated with Certified Animal
Waste Management Plans and the method by which the irrigated acres within the plans were calculated. Only
the acres that are wetted can be credited in the waste management plan as receiving waste application. Any
acreage within the plan that can not be reached by waste application equipment can not be used as part of your
plan.
An evaluation by Brian Wrenn on 7/23/99 was made to review the actual number of acres at your facility
that receive animal waste during land application. The evaluation of your facility has yielded one of the
following two results as indicated by the box marked with an "X".
Category 1:
The evaluation of your facility could not be completed due to a lack of information. Please
contact your Technical Specialist to assist in providing Stoney Mathis the necessary
information to potentially exempt your facility from undergoing a complete wettable acre
determination. Please submit this information to Stoney Mathis, at 127 Cardinal Drive
Extension, Wilmington, NC 28405-3845, within in 90 days of the receipt of this letter. if you
have any questions please contact Stoney Mathis at [phone]. If within 90 days you
are unable to provide Stoney Mathis with the information you are automatically
required to complete a Wettable Acre Determination as described by Category 2
below, within 180 days of receipt of this letter.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%a post -consumer paper
. �,

Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Category 2:
❑ Your facility has been identified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
as a facility that may have overestimated the number of acres actually receiving animal
waste. Therefore, some or all of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates
set in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated Technical Specialist to have him
or her conduct a Wettable Acre Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must
be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to conduct
Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialist with the N.C. Cooperative Extension
Service, the Soil and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and the Division -of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System must be made and
the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be returned to DWQ within the next
180 days. If the needed modifications are not made and if the form is not returned within the
required time, DWQ will be forced to take appropriate enforcement actions to bring this facility
into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty assessments, permit revocation,
and/or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of the attached Wettable
Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the address listed on the form. Please
note that both the owner and the Technical Specialist must sign the certification. A copy of all
the Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste Utilization Plan
must be kept at your facility. DWQ and the Division of Soil & Water Conservation Staff will
review all documentation during their annual visit of your facility. An additional copy must by
kept on file at the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office. Please note that if you install
or modify your irrigation system, a designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer
must also sign the Wettable Acre Determination Certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sonya Avant of our
Central Office staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Carroll's Foods, Inc.

e
OMvision of Soilrand Water CQnservBtlOnfi r v s ¢
s is 'Other Agency.
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other [) Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: ^� Time: 3G0
Q dT
Permitted [ �C(ertified �[l Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date bast Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: I *` �- 1�l..VJE.................................. County: ....
D��a.h................................. ............
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:..............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:........................................ Phone No
MailingAddress: .........................................................................................................................................................................................................
OnsiteRepresentative: G................................................................................. Integrator:.. V1 \.....................................................
CertifiedOperator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
7
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �� �" Longitude �• �� ���
es
wine 'Capacity
Curirint I) el Ago ID Population Poultry Ca ac Po ulation. Ca1�, R 7'Curireiut C
S Cattle acy Po ulation
�E Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy-10
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Feeder i
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area Spray Field Area
Number of Lagoons ❑ t; ❑ P Y
Holding Ponds / Solid'Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System ,
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
KNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
D] No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
(M No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes V,�No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identi ricr:........................................................................................................... .................................... ....................................
....................................
Freeboard (inches): �a-
5/00
Continued on back

Facility Number: —qg, ] I Date of Inspection 0 printed on. 10/26/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
)5�No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
No
8. Does any part -of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Po_nd-ing PAN ❑%Hlydraulifc Overload
❑ Yes
kNo
(�❑
12. Crop type �2�V_4� Y I alt-�� ti a CQI, L-.f
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
)RfNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
%No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
XYes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
)4 No
Reouired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
'Z No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
)% No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
XYes
d No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
XNo
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
'5?fNo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
9No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Jd No
24,
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
15No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
IV No
yiolatior s:or• Midendes 4..ere pgte�i• daring •this:visjt. Yo(i witl rep K 06 furthgr
:: cor'resporideirce: about this :visit. :::. .. • • • • • • •
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (u a additionalp ages as necessaYES nswers and/or an' ary)ns4or;any other comments +,y: { F
-Con ments q- )• p Y
A.
Reviewer/Inspector Name I � t {/\1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: CX Date: ��L(-�� 5/00

Fae iity Number:' — $ Date of inspection Printed on: 10/26/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes 11� No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
[]Yes
No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
ONo
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
4 No
'Additional °ommeq an . or Drawings:
IT 55
►mow � ,� i� o� t-.aee�c , ►- - c�,� 't Om 4- Q�
�6�-J t�A rG"�
V.o�"
OVA 1\ i �d ��1a��1r a
►-�r�.o �lt�--.ter �t�J-.�Cc.
r �
AS
GA a� s Ib
5100

Type of Visit C'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit A5 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: ZRn
ime:
ratNot nO al Belo Threshold
0 Permitted [3 Certified 13 Conditionalll C rtified 0 Registered Date Last Operate or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: / County:
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator: k2LL_-,'_
Operator Certification Number:
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0a 0° 0" Longitude 0' 0� 0 «
LJ Feeder to Finish LU Non -Layer _ __ E �' �LJ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean'"�°
,h El Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars Tso�al SSLW
Subsurface Drains Present
No Liuuid Waste ManaQen
Discharges _4 Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
Field Area
❑ Yes JVNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
El Yes ONO
No
❑ Yes XNo
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes �No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes /No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) ,f
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ElYes �Q No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ElYes [ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ZNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes X/1
0
11.Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding [IPAN [IHydraulic Overload ElYes No
12. Crop type W
,
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those Jesignated in the Certified A'niJ Waste Manage ent Plan ( AWMP)?
❑ Yes
P/No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
;_dT,o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
VNo
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�No
Regp
red Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
4 No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes/No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
Ef No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback, criteri a in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
[EllYes
,(�o
(�J No
I
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
(�No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[Ld No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
No
25,
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
�No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations ar any at er comi ients� a
Use drawings of facility to betier explain situations (use additional pages as.necessary) _ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
g9 _ �/�ieZ Dry 5 6W FO/z �FitJT�2
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
0510310I .r Continued

Facility Number: — Dateof lnspcetion r-2�� Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes XNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes 1
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes xj
No
31, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes No
Additional omments and/orDrawings:
a
y .�z
5/00

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Sherri Evans -Stanton, Acting Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
MARSHALL H. PHILLIPS
M & C NURSERY
903 WARDS BRIDGE ROAD
WARSAW NC 28398
Dear Marshall Phillips:
JAN 18 Z001
January 12, 2001
1 0 •
mom
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS310787
Additional Information Request
M & C Nursery
Animal Waste Operation
-Duplin County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application.
Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by February 11, 2001:
The WUP submitted calculates the amount of nitrogen produced in one year. However, it appears that the
WUP uses a two-year crop rotation. Your WUP should be revised so that the nitrogen produced and the
nitrogen utilized by crops is calculated for the same time period. Some options for revising the WUP
include: calculating the amount of nitrogen produced for a two-year period of time; revising your WUP to
show waste utilization for Year One and Year Two of the two-year rotation in separate tables; or showing a
two- year crop rotation with corn and soybeans on half the acreage from each field.
2. Please provide the date when the facility originally began operation.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information
should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this
letter must be submitted on or before February 11, 2001 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in
accordance with 15A N.C.A:C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
S' rely
JR Joshi
Soil Sci tilt
Non- scharge Permitting Unit
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Marshall H. Phillips
M & C Nursery
903 Wards Bridge Road
Warsaw NC 28398
Farm Number: 31 - 787
Dear Marshall H. Phillips:
13Y:
OG 1 2 � Luui
October 23, 2000
11
/ •T Z , W, A 1V
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL REsouRGEs
You are hereby notified that M & C Nursery, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC, must apply for coverage under
an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached
application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session
1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the'general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Theresa Nartea at [phone] extension 375 or
Stoney Matthis with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely_,
}for__ -T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Wilmington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

13 DiAsion of Soil and Water Conservation ew Operation Revir €
[3 Division of Soil and. Water Conservation` Compliance Inspection',
f i,r r d i*4ipn of Water, Quality,E ,Compliance Irispecttori i€ F i14 v,61 £'e °t
,i I! a
i,., „ i
' ' s ,Other Agency' Operation Review
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of
Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection Q {j
.. ...... Time of Inspection hr. (hh:mm)
13 Permitted AIR
ertified ❑ Conditio lly Certified [3 Registered ©Nit O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name. Count
........................-.. y:............
OwnerName:.. (............... .. ... l.l,� .5..................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: . .... .... flA tic:.........�%�� ......................... Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address: ............ ......................................Z­­­­
............................../..;............. ..............I...........
Onsite Representative:ti, .C..l.l Integrator:........../..S .......................... ...........
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
............................. .. .................................................................................................... .....
Latitude �° Longitude • �� �«
,Design Current''C, " C i l i u 1 '; Desi it CnrrE ntj
SwinePEF I Capacity Population' Capalcity o `elationt
Wean to Feeder
s
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
Design Cur1. rent gill ,Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
[71 Other t i
Total Design°Capacity
Tota] SSLW
Number of Lagoons �' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present JJEJ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray yield Area
�r
Holdin EPonds / Solid Traps 11,j❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes )Nc
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ElYes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (Freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: f!
Freeboard(inches): ........4 .............................................................................................................. ...........................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes ❑ No
r J /"- I
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
[]Yes )9_No
Structure 6
...............................
❑ Yes �No
Continued on back

Facility dumber: — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
7 9 d
*01 Yes *No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ ith those esignated in t e Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Rio yipla ' igns'r• dcienues hOie dV'rrihis:isiwid fui-thoefie vi
;g
isvtcorrespondnce.aboutth
! - 3 l - - Y l S " 1 YS 3
Comments (refer toLquesiiorr #) �Explarn;any YES answers andlor,any'recommendations orany other coin
3 i. r
Use drawmg'•s of fatality to better explain'situatio� (use.addtt<onal�pages as necessary) i '� i,3i' E 4 „�
❑ Yes *No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes �NO
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes No
El Yes \No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes �(No
❑ Yes .No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes '(No
❑ Yes [(No
[]Yes %No
AL
lk -f � 7
51& Ah G+di -�; �.CO� RC�vSS f rr,� F►os4srs 1 vi' ---
�y
pector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature;/ Date:

Facility Number: -- Date of Itispection f7
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32.
iiditional Comments and/or >Jrawings: 1
t .; 1
.
jig,', �� t � 5 � s � o��-�•��� vJ-�7s �. CX�c.��: ,f�
��-�— s r-;�-.. f1Mr � ��► Vet l �
C �
W� �A4-
the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
C� G�5 �ba��,
di5'�Ylvl' �T�GC-Tu �@N( WIA1 ��`RMntU-OYkill—
�lX�ce �c�vw��a1.
❑ Yes KNO
❑ Yes %No
❑ Yes �4No
❑ Yes O_No
❑ Yes VNo
[-]Yes ONO
❑ Yes [$ No
AL
3/23/99

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
.lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Marshall H. Phillips
M & C Nursery
903 Wards Bridge Road
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear Marshall H. Phillips:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 8, 1999
Subject: Conditional Approval
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 31-787
Duplin County
Our records indicate that your facility was conditionally certified in order to fulfill the requirements of
completion of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan Certification. This letter is to inform you of your
unresolved conditional approval status. Any facility receiving a conditional approval must notify Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) in writing within 15 days after the date that the work needed to resolve the conditional certification
has been completed. Any failure to notify DWQ as required, subjects the owner to an enforcement action. As of
December 7, 1999, we have no record of any information from you, advising us of the status of your conditional
approval. Therefore, please fill out the attached form and have your technical specialist and landowner sign the form
in the appropriate areas.
The completed form must be submitted to this office on or before 45 days of receipt of this letter. Please be
advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or liability for failure to
provide DWQ with proper notification of your conditional certification status or possible failure to comply with the
requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste management plan by December 31, 1997.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]
extension 571.
Sincerely,
Sonya L. Avant
Environmental Engineer
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Marshall H. Phillips
M & C Nursery
903 Wards Bridge Road
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear -Marshall H. Phillips:
A Iffl?W'A
174 0 2
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 31-787
Duplin County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that.are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY), DRY2, DRY3, SLURi, SLUR2,
SLDI , and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincere] ,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Revised April 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number 31 - iio Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: _ -Mrs" ha!- L acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: Lao i��,L+��,s Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: jrtak- WmAr, peration not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
Date of site visit: 14, exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP: z ✓ Operation pended for weft le acre
determination based on P1 P2 P3
Annual farm PAN deficit: 1 j . 5* _ pounds
D
Irrigat' - circle . hard-hose:tra:ye:1er:-!0,, center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. ationary s rinkler system wlpermanent ; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
fi. stationary gun system w p en pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportabfe pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D)D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE:75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part I1- F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART 11. 75% Rule .Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below: r
_F1 Lack ofacreage vhichTesultedin-over-application:ofwastewater..(PAN) on -spray
field(s)accord ing fofarm's-last-two years mfirrigationTecords.--.
F2 Unclear; -illegible, -or lack of information/map.
_.F3 Obviousfeld-limitations -(numerous -.ditches jdailure 1o:deductTequired
buffer/setback:acreage;-or.25%':of.total.acreage_.identifed_in'CAWMP::includes
small; irregularly shaped felds = fields.less1han-5-acresfor.travelers-or.]ess than
2 acres -for .Stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits feld(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part Ill.

Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number 31 - )3-7
Part Ili. Field by Field Determination of
75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD TYPE OF
NUMBER'-' IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS'
3Z0-1
.
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
i
I
I
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or -point numbers -may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system.- If pulls, etc. cross -more -than one field, inspectorfreviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; -otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBERZ - must be clearly delineated -on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP-acreage.exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as -documented in the farm's previous -two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation Tecords;Can not serve as -the
sole basis -for requiring a WA Determination.hack-upfiieldsTnust-be noted in the-commentaectionand must be accessible
by irrigation system.
Part IV. Pending WA Determinations -
✓P1 Plan 1acks.following -information: moap% w04t, 4-o hw Z rr. 5
P2 Plan revision may-satisfY75% rule based on adequate overall PAN deficit -and by
adjusting all field -acreage to below 75% use rate
_ZP 3 Other (ielin process of installing new irrigation system): ;r +roGcss of 1► 4 �Er.,�

,Eli _' $, 4 :ttf 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation Operation Review <<€ [' k
,I 0 Division of S81I an[l water COriserVatlOR y 0I11p11ance Inspectloll
W
Division of Water QualityComphsnee inspection..,.,,.,
. IE i i:$:'l� t, - �': Ogler Agency -OperatiWjReyiew t a.
IQ Routine Q Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ ins ection O Follow -tip of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 'j 7 Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ��24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Not O erational}� Date Last Operated : ..........................
Farm Name: (fin' K+. (......N.. UV.—Y ...... County: ........ .t2`q.1'h:............................................................
Owner Name:.............. !`!LpsfSW/ ............ ..........lilj- jjk .IS................. Phone No: 1`�j01. .�a.-..7........................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: .....%QS ".......IAJPK S........� Y!(1 4�.....L .:.... .. . .... {tl.....N..:................................... ..� 4. ......
Onsite Representative 1 i. ``e .......................................................
' p Qlra........\. .. �.t.` 5 Integrator: !i tior
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:......................... ...........
Location of Farm:
........ ................ ................Rua ...........i
..................................................................................................................................... _
........a ....1!4.(` -.... is . �f..... aan-::.. '.....5 ....i ......................................................................
Latitude Longitude
, re
CCurreni 7es►gn tDesign Current ;Design
city
t
SWme Poultry Caa., attle PouatiCa acity Po ulation on
Wean to Feeder Z 3$5 ❑Layer ❑ Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish FIE] Nan -Layer �j ❑ Non -Dairy I
❑ Farrow to Wean ;
lr❑ Farrow to Feeder , ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish t'' 1 `
Total Design Capacity Ss2� a
E;; ❑ GiltsE
❑ Boars i q Iyl hip E Total-SsLo
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [IOther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is ohscrved, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes
P] No
❑ Yes
1� No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
[J No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure; 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ............2-.............................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes P No
. seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
T Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
{ &V-A i
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required_ Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes [� No
❑ Yes FP No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
WMPr ❑ Yes "pNo
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
:No
❑ Yes
? No
❑ Yes
E�No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes 1� No
Yes ❑ No
[lYes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 1P No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes [ No
❑ Yes /�� No
❑ Yes ® No
0: 1o•yiola[idiis;or• defcie dte mere noted• djt'rift this;visit: • Y;ott will-teceiye iJ6 ru>�-tl1 r;
corres' oriderrce. abaut: this visit: -
Comments (refer to question #) �Explarn anyEYES,answers and/or any;recommendatiotis or`any,other comments i,
Us'e+drawings of facilatyto°better'eXplaEri situations I(use ad�tsoaal pages as�necessary} a ` ' t'e'o i ,�`,rt A� I E� �i `�
t ,
it • All C�vhd� �cccql j' Q f f� : tf+f QC. P, r` g�nc�v i v\ AX rr- ! rt Ca rt�5
1� T ,, 1coWX C.A" 4OJ s�ar say�ear.JSS�at,�r� {al lc c� 01- 4 -
A -yam v kk% r-jo.Sc qv,&(
45�5 5�1� A lo¢- iA 04m rtcork k) u� sl't dd bQ-
1('tVA �c , � I fft a1"►0r� sysS t t_Q' t5 in5ff-{LLJ.
5
C,,-r j �, ttr�STDt� �,yy fktLA) i t'Y lvq or- s1�S�EYr
�I
Reviewer/Inspector Name , {{ ' ya t
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. t Date: 7/2-3 /) 3
3/23/99

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
[PNo
/[%No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
ElYes
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
[� No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
� No
'Additiona , omments an or rawings:,
A
3/23/99

[3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑Other Agency
t ,
„.
�x
Division of Water Quality
W.Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of.DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection D % 0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered ;0 Certified D Applied for Permit © Permitted [3Not Operational Date Last Operated:
FarisName; .................. f�k:°`�.-��nn-.Jr. ............................................................................. County:....... �1��. ^.................................... ... I ...................
Itki
Owner Name: ................... 1!!!ta?C' w\1...........p.Y1...................................... .. Phone No: �R�Q}�. ..7. S..................................
Facility Contact: ....................................................................... ... Title:................ . Phone No:
MailingAddress: .......... O.b3........ .1...i`t17t}[.......,................................. ..........I L612.::.,.... n....................................... x ........
Onsite Representative:...........eq-q&t...............................................
`.............. ., ... Integrator:......... y'' .�. �.............. I...... ........
Certified Operators............ ,r�1e.1.ti.....................Phil. {fo...............1.................... Operator Certification Number;--DI..'rt ........................
Location of Farm:
..........n...... Sitl..... a...... ..�� �1..1.....a:.5... m.if N.....et&.5T.... .a .....R...?............................................................................................. A
.................................. ..... .................................................................................... ................................................. ...
Latitude ' " 1 Longitude • ' 4'
Design Current Y Design r�Current C
S,.wine '� 'Capactty,,Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle, C:
55 Wean to Feeder
3S Z
3 2
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non Layer I I
JEI Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity L
&V5 I
Total SSLW /r76 s'tRo
IN Subsurface Drains Pres!jtjjE1 Lagoon Area A® Spray Field Area
...
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 9 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVrnin?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes PNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 09 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes Q1 No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes [P No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 0 No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes P9 No
7/25/97

_F
Facility Number: 31 --? $ 7
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ® No
Structures La ns.Holding fonds lush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Q No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): �•Z
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
RZ No
H.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[3 No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
[,BNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
No
(If in excess of WNW, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
I L
Crop type ...............:b4.1L.1:?�Llh ............... 5.r'!'0.1�....1... .................. ........sA..� .5..............................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
Jallo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
'UNo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
91 No
20.'
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[ No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
[?Yes
No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
[] Yes
No
0 No.vidlations•o' defic 6de's4e're' 6ted-during this: visit.', You.will receive' -n, &further
c4)eresoo0debce about .this; visit: - : . . . .. ........ X , „ ,
V7_ �E.�n�.cwEi1'c�. ion `+ tur��ltw� r '�w �anr� a�Plica�iaA 54.o�tci tr, �rf,�• cods. 1�
�e eA m"(1 Q-- Come' P N N mt t SiovI6 be l F6+° ii,w
� { GYo P r r Ok" Gv� a n� 1r Y�r veS e�. C►r� 4 itin�1
60— Cro rw 4e bQ�w c U 1 ;,,}o (e.,•� .
orb- crop &W, �-e "� ;r 11.
7/25/97
Reviewer/Insector Names
p
,Ah'l1`ht''
Rr s `
Ps�€
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Z d,�.�
Date: 162
1

RECEIVED
NOV 17 1997
BY:
Marshall, H. Phillips
903 Wards Bridge Road
Warsaw, N.C. 28398 f
November 11, 1997
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
M&C Nursery
Facility Number: 3I-3-9-& -T Y,
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Helminger
I wanted to inform you that the two separate certified animal
waste plans that you reviewed have been taken to the Duplin
County Soil and Water Office for combination into one plan. I
will mail you a updated plan for your review as soon as I receive
it. The plan is being prepared by Mr. Patrick Fussell of said
office if you have questions.
Sincerely,
shall H. P lips

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Division of Water Quality
November 3, 1997
Cellified Mail #Z312636715
Return Rgceipt Requested,
Marshall H. Phillips
M&C Nursery
903 Wards Bridge Road
Warsaw, North Carolina 28398
NCDENR
NORTH C^ROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
M&C Nursery
Facility Number: 31-787
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Phillips:
On October 30, 1997, staff from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality inspected your animal operation and the lagoon serving this operation. During the
inspection, it was observed that you are using two separate certified animal waste management
plans with two separate sets of spray fields. These plans must be combined into a single plan
reflecting your current management practices. We suggest that you contact your service company,
local NRCS office, or Soil and Water District office for any assistance they may be able to provide
to correct this situation.
You must notify this office in writing within fourteen (14) days of the receipt of this notice,
what actions are being taken to correct this deficiency. Failure to do so may result in the facility
losing its deemed permitted status and being required to obtain an individual non discharge permit.
Please be aware it is a violation of North Carolina General Statutes to discharge wastewater
to the surface waters of the State without a permit. The Division of Water Quality has the
authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 per day per violation.
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Marshall H. Phillips
November 3, 1997
Page 2
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Andy Helminger, David
Holsinger, or Brian Wrenn at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
Andrew G. Helminger
Environmental Specialist
cc: Harold Jones, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation
Sandra Weitzel, N.C. Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Don Butler, Carroll's Foods, Inc.
Operations Branch
Wilmington Files
S:1WQSlAMJYA 131-787.DEF
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 29405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

(3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
ElDivision of Water Quality
Q Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Fallow-u of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection p
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered ®,Certified E3 Applied for Permit © Permitted 113 Not O eratirrnal Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: U . ...u...��.^.......................................V11%.
Owner Name:....... JA. .: ,.. ::1....i.. s...................................... Phone 9..L.Q.�........7,Z......................
Facility Contact: ................................................................ Title:................... . Phone No:
J...�..............Mailing Address: 2 ...... :lI...............
.........
Onsite Rtresentative:. ,.. .
�p ....L.a.�...........1/.a..}...1..4...�?.�.......................................... Integrator:...... Y�...�...�i..........
f � l
Certified Operator-Mg.V.S.h.41)........... (�1��.�.. .� Operator Certification Number... r�.. 1.................
Location of Farm:
1,n......tn.n........... S.i. d .......,,,�.. . Z..... ,.}....a .p�.3 ['D..)f a.�Nra . ..........Ii....,.....raa.�..,.....�-.cv.t..i�....
{S..R..] 3..�..i.......................... I. -t �.li'..r �:.t.�..�r, .....:..t.�..........:............I................... . .
Latitude ©• MJ' 96 Longitude 131fle E30, "�"
Mst ri ;°
g Current
, Desi n� h Current
.. & g '� Design Current.' Fri
.°Swe y ,Capacity Poptilataon
A Pauitry Capacity �Pppulatton CatEle city Population=
Capin
,111�Wean
to Feeder
❑Layer
; '
❑Dairy
"no
rO Feeder to Finish
❑Nan -Layer
❑Non-Dairy
Farrow to Wean
f
❑a
Farrow to Feeder
s❑Other I I
.3�
❑ Farrow to Finish'
Total DesignCapacity' Z
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
JC
To.. SSLW.`
°Number of Lagoons/ Holditig Ponds"
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
S
`
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System p "fie:
x
. ,. Y::�
.3'', , <
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
MNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
IgNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
® No
b. if discharge is observed, dill it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
A. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
® No
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
R1 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
KNo
5. Does any part of the waste Management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
gNo
maintenance/improvement?
6. facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
MNo
7. Did e facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
&No
7/25/97 \\
Continued
on back

f '
Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ® No
Structures (Laeoons.Hold ima Ponds. Flush Pits. etc
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes E No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...... LA'S . .......................
Freeboard (ft): ...........................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes KNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes KNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? JRLYes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes JR No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes U.No
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .�........M .! N......................e:41160., M1^...^........... C.o.x:. ^:......... .........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes j$.No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0. No.violations; or d'iciencie's +were; noted during this:visit:; :You:will: receive: ill' :ftirilier;
correspondence about this'visit : :. .. :.
❑ Yes RNo
JaYes ❑ No
❑ Yes I$No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
K Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes E9 No
R Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ®-No
12.. t p ►^o b �a,,... S o t �a t e a� co - 4 �s a -+., �a.,tier
�q • �} d r l` o ,.� i y� ��p Y^V , `4i�.r-w. t„dt.y1� x } N-�d l �a �ii G� Q L L V
z�-• � 5a- t 1 d--Y-a\1 �-y s� w � �-+�. w�-� v-d-:t . 1
z a , o �z.►-b.,{�,r 1�.a-� bl isi.w � s � � t••w . Se.�-an-.r. t•e� � u-t �-e.. p C a,.,�.� with �t u
s VA, " y Q % i tke4 • i kits e. � �,t,j..x tom., ., s t is.� �a to r , Ak
r4 r1.0"
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ra„_t A o ..r _%)I . �r �,.__ ; 1 fti Dale:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Marshall H. Phillips
M & C Nursery
903 Wards Bridge Road
Warsaw NC 28398
[DaHNF:;Z
November 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: M & C.Nursery
Facility ID#:13i1=7.87,
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Phillips:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, 1K 14C FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 �An Equal Opportunity/Affirrnative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

i
17y
EC cNutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Util' at�n`
11-01-2005 as
Y` <2P05
This plan, as been prepared for:
M& C 31 "787
Marshall Phillips
903 Wards Bridge Rd
Warsaw, NC 28398
910- 290-0111
This plan has been developed by.
Bill Thomas
NR CS
PO Box 219
Kenansville, NC 28349
910-296-2193
ell/
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer)
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
Technical Specialist Signature Date
------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------•------------------------------------------------ .--------------
243409 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-01-2005 Cover Pave E

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S5
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid waste generated 678,432 gals/year by a 3,552 animal
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste storage
capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
1563
Incorporated
2684
Injected
2955
Irrigated
1698
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
1,698
2811
-1,113
1,122,799
-444,367
Year 2
1,698
3635
-1,937
1,451,772
-773,340
--- -- - --- - - -- --- -- ----- -- - -- - ---- -- -- ---
Note: fn source 1D, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
243409 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1 1-01-2005 Source Page Page I of

Narrative
Pulls 1 & 2 on tract 3128 are not requied to meet th nutrient budget, but can be used if needed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----
2-43409 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1 1-01-2005 Narrative Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1462
1
2.00
1,80
NIA
Bonneau
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
1462
A
4.00
3.50
NIA
Bonneau
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
1402
B
2.00
1.60
NIA
Bonneau
Com, Grain
85 bu.
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
1462
Pivot
8.001
7,48
NIA
Bonneau
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
3218
PI
5.00
4.00
NIA
Autryville
Cam, Grain
85 bu.
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
3219
P2
5.00
4.00
N/A
Aup•yvillc
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
PLAN TOTALS: 26.00 22.38
Ll
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
< 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<= 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered.
> 10
Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term
No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers
243409 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 11/1/2005
PCS Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol « means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation- This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
(lie nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste -that will be applied on each Geld in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Suurce
11)
Suil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(1bs1A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
IOW gals
tons
1462
1
S5
E3onneau
2.00
1,80
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
2/15-6130
104
0
20
Irrig.
84
33.55
0.00
00.40
0.00
1462
1
S5
E3onneau
2.00
1,80
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
911-4130
104
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.62
0.00
29.91
0.00
1462
A
S5
E3onneau
4.00
3.50
Corn, Grain
85 bu.
2115-6130
104
0
20
Irrig,
84
33.55
0.00
117.44
0.00
1462
A I
SS
E3onneau
4.00
3.50
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
9/1-4/30
104
0
0
brig.
42
16.62
0.00
58.16
0.00
1462
E3
S5
l3onneau
2,00
1.00
Com, Grain
85 bu.
2115-6/30
104
0
20
Irrig.
84
33.55
0.00
53.69
0,04
1402
13 -
S5
E3onneau
2.00
1.60
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
911-4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.62
0.00
26.59
0.00
1462
Pivot
S5
E3onneau
8A4
7.48
Com, Grain
85 hu.
2115-6130
104
0
20
Irrig.
84
33.55
0.00
250.98
0.00
1462
Pivot
S5
l3onneau
8.00
7,48
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
9/14/34
104
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.62
0.00
124.29
0.00
3218
111
S5
Autryville
5.00
4.00
Corn, Graitl
85 bu.
2/15-6/30
104
0
20
Irrig.
84
33.55
0.00
134.21
0.00
3218
PI
S5
Autryvillc
5.00
4.00
Wheat, Grain
45 hu.
9/1-4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.62
0.00
66.47
0.00
3218
P2
S5
Autryville
5.00
4.00
Corn. Grain
85 hu.
2115-6130
104
0
20
Irrig.
84
33.55
0.0o
134.21
0.00
3218
112
S5
Autryvillc
FTOo
4.00
Wheat, Grain
45 hu.
9/14130
104
0
0
Irrig.
42
16.62
0.00
66.47
0.00
243409 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/1/2005 WUT Page Page 1 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Sulid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fen.
(lbs/A)
PA
ManureA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
NUtrientA
pplied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
pplied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
Source
Total
Use.
Applic.
Applic.
low
Tract
Field
II)
Suit Series
Acres
Acres
Crop
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied. 1000 gallons
1,122.80
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
678,43
[Balance, 1000 gallons
—444.37
Total Applied. tons
_ _
0.00
'final Produced, tuns
:. ,- .
, :� ;� .�
0.00
Balance, tuns
-.
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
243409 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1 i/1/2005 WUT Page Page 2 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
11)
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
FeM
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res,
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NotrienLA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1462
1
S5
E3onneau
2.00
1.90
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
911-4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.93
0.00
44.87
0.00
1462
1
S5
E3onneau
2.00
1.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
411-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.94
0.00
71.90
0.00
1462
A
S5
E3onneau
4.00
3.50
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
9/1-4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
62
24,93
0.00
87.24
0.00
1462
A
S5
l3onneau
4.00
3.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.941
0.00
139.801
0.00
1462
13
S5
l3onneau
2.00
1.00
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
9/1-4/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
tit
24.93
0.00
39.88
0.00
1462
B
S5
13unneau
2.00
1.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.94
0.00
63.91
0.00
1462
Pivot
S5
E3onneau
8.00
7.48
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
9/14/30
104
0
0
Irrig.
62
24,93
0.00
186.44
0.00
1462
Pivot
SS
13onneau
8.00
7.48
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.94
0.00
298.78
0.00
3218
P1
S5
Autryville
5.00
4.00
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
9/1-4130
104
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.93
0.00
99.70
0.00
3218
P1
S5
Autryville
5.00
4.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
411-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.94
0.00
159.78
0.00
3218
P2
S5
Autryville
5.00
4.00
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
9/1-4/30
104
0
0
brig.
62
2493
0.00
99.70
0.00
3218
P2
S5
Autryville
5.00
4.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.94
1' 0.00
159.78
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
1,451.777
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
678.43=
Balance, 1000 gallons
-773,34
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced. tons
,' ;
0.00
Balance, tons
r .-
0.00
Notes: I. In the tract column, symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
243409 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: I I1112005
WUT Page Page 3 of 3

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff., This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
1462
1
Bonneau
0.60
1.0
.1462
A
Bonneau
0.60
1.0
1462
B
Bonneau
0.60
1.0
1462
Pivot
Bonneau
0.60
1.0
3218
PI
Autryville
0.60
1.0
3218
1 P2
Autryville
0.60
1.0
243409 Database Version 3,1 Date Printed 1 1/1/2005 IAF Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source,
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied, On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes,
phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
Ib/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum 'Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Nursery Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
9-04
18.08
27.12
Hay 6 ton R.Y.L.
300
26.32
4.52
9.04
13,56
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
8,48
16.95
23.43
.-...-------------------------------- - ----------------------........----------------------------...-...-------------------------------....------------------------------------------
243409 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-01-2005 Sludge Page Page I of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application'of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure, Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storatre Capacity
Source Name
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
911
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
28
1
2
81
1
3
131
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
149
1
8
118
1
9
138
1
10
157
1
11
177
1
12
180
2
1
180
2
2
180
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
180
2
6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
149
2
11
119
2
12
88
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
243409 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1 1-01-2005 Capacity Page Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. 'There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the -use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
G. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
-----------------------------------------------------...-------------------------------------------------------------------....----------------------------
243409 Database Version 3A Date Printed: 11/1/2005 Specification Page 1

S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
-------------------------------------------------------------------•-•--------------------------------.--------------- --------------------------------
243409 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1 1/1/2005 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
-----------------•• -• ------
243409 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1 U1/2005 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, A, B , PI, P2, Pivot
Corn: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leaching
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 3040
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, A, B , P1, P2, Pivot
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Sol], medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 ]bs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining
N should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type.
Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat.
Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
------------------------- --------••-----------------------------------------------------...---------------------------------------------------------------
2 t3. 09 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-01-2005 Crop Note Page Page I of 2

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, A, B , Pl, P2, Pivot
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medium leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by, at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
---------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
243409 Database Version 3,1 Date Printed: 11-01-2005 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 2

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: / Arrival Time: � eparture Time: County:�Wyolti] Region: ,
r/
Farm Name: % /2 S Owner Email:
1 I, Owner Name: 1 < &"�! /1�7� Phone.
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: 11,114 0, _'� LC_
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator: �� �✓ �rQOcJrJ
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = 1 = fl Longitude: = ° = g =
Design Current
Swine WDacity Population Wet Poultry M
Design
Capacity
Current
Population
Design
Cattle Capacity
Current
Population
❑ Wean [o Finish
❑ Layer
DairyCow
❑ Dairy Calf
Wean to Feeder
D ❑ Non -Layer
Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
La ers
El Layers
❑Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Dry Cow
Non-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
El Beef Stocker
❑Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Other
❑ Other ❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104
Continued

Facility Number:. — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: 10
Spillway?: /VD
Designed Freeboard (in);
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No
❑ Ye ❑ No
Structure 5
❑NA El NE
El NA ❑NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes tofNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes / No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �No El NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acce table Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ElApplication Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s) ���,ll,/� (� � w1Z 1/7,6 r✓I�
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
�ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
�No ❑NA ❑NE
[2[No❑ NA El NE
9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any. YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): .
47) ��zl a Jaa,
Reviewer/Inspector Name I�
Phone:
ReviewertInspector Signature:
Date:
Page 2 of 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 3 — Date of Inspection 0
Reguired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ yes oNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WU, ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. []Yes JONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑rNo
ONA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
"ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
9No
0 NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Z NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
944o
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
JiNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
C/4,j D'�mP
t4ln-tio o qr
i
Page 3 of 3 12128104

PR-1.1-2006 04:17 AM
P. 01
aCAPE FEAR FARM CREDIT. ACA
sp
1
P,O. Box 528
110
i Kellaniville. NC 29349
(91.0)-296-1776
(910)-296-117 7 E rkx]
Rw pages:
LD Urgent ❑ For Review Cl Please Comment D Please Reply 0 Please Recycle
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(-)PR-1,1-2006 04:18 AM
P.02
SWINE FARM
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION,
AND MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR
Marshall Phillips
May 2, 1996
I certify that this Plan has been prepared under my direct
supervision and meets the applicable regulations of
NRCS, DEM, and all other State and Local Regulations
to the best of ttly,�gldiJbelief.
,•,� tN CA bAl
M. Floyd A
License No.
GIN
,% 0 YID 09 , `��

APR- 1,1 -2006 04 : 1 e AM
LAGOON DESIGN (
P.03
Operator:MARSHALL PHILLIPS County:
DUPLIN
Date:
02/16/96
listance to nearest residence (other
than
owner):
2800.0
feet
�.. AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT (ALW)
0 sows (farrow to finish)
x
1417
lbs. =
0
lbs
0 sows (farrow to feeder)
x
522
Ibe. m
0
lbs
0 head (finishing only)
x
135
lbs. =
0
lbs
0 sows (farrow to wean)
x
433
lbs. =
0
The
3552 head (wean to feeder)
x
30
lbs.
106560
lbs
Describe other :
0
Total
e g -
106560
lbs
verage Live
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume - 106560 lbs. ALW x Treatment Volume(CF) lb. ALW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW - 1 CF/W ALW
Volume = 106560 cubic feet
. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0. 0 cubic feet Ker ZMALuv® 0" D,"Os ';'Aff4Vxrr
.. TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
Inside top length (feet)--------------------- 220.0
Inside to width (feet) --------- �---------- 128.0
Top of dike elevation (feet)------------------ 45.5
Bottom of lagoon elevation (feet)------------ 34.5
Freeboard (feet)----------------------------- 1.0
Side slopes (inside lagoon)- =---------------- 3.0 1
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1SS/END2 SS/SIDE) SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 214.0 122.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
214.0 122.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH
154.0 62.0
26108 (AREA OF TOP)
9548 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
DEPTH
10.0
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
184.0 92.0 67712 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. - ,AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOMO * DEPTH/6
26108.0 67712.0 9548.0 1.7
Total Designed Volume Available - 172280 CU. FT.

APR71,1-2006 04:19 AM
P.04
5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width
220.0 128.0 28160.0 square feet
Buildings (root and lot water)
0.0 square feet
TOTAL DA 28160.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be
';A. Volume of waste produced
Describe this area.
180 days.
Feces & urine production in gal./day per 135 lb. ALW 1.37
Volume = 106560 lbs. ALW/135 lbs. ALW * 1.37 gal/day 190 days
Volume 194650 gals. or 26022.7 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
,the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallons
per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
-C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 16426.7 cubic Peet

APR-y111-2006 04:19 AM
P.95
5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.5 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume a 17600.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A.
26023
cubic
feet
53.
0
cubic
feet
5C.
16427
cubic
feet
5D.
17600
cubic
feet
TOTAL 60049 cubic feat
6. SUMMARY
Temporary storage period===m====m=====______>
180
days
Rainfall in excess of evaporation====n=====_>
7.0
inches
25 year - 24 hour rainfall======G == =a===>
7.5
inches
Freeboard===-----------m
1.0
feet
Side slopes===----__________---_-____--_______>
3.0
: 1
Inside top length===-===esCG========e=mmsmmmm>
220.0
feet .
Inside top
128.0
feet
Top of dike elevation=====____===========___>
45.5
feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation=====a=====_______>
34.5
feet
Total required Volume====-___=====aa=a=mmmma>
166609
cu. ft.
Actual design volume=ma=====_____=====m==sa=>
172280
cu. ft.
Seasonal high watertable elevation (SHWT)===>
38.2
feet
Stop pumping elev.===------==----=====n=====>
41.7
feet
Must be > or = to the SHWT elev.=====a====>
38.2
feet
Must be > or a to min. req, treatment el.=>
40.5
feet
Required minimum treatment volume=ms====a >
106560
cu. ft.
Volume at stop pumping elevation=====_______>
107856
cu. ft.
Start pumping
43.7
feet
Must be at bottom of freeboard 6 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25 yr.- 24 hr. rainfall==>
154680
cu. ft.
Volume at start umping elevation=====______>
153261
cu. ft.
Required volume �o be pumped=======s=@=mQ >
42449
cu. ft.
Actual volume planned to be'pumped=====_-___>
45405
cu. ft.
Min. thickness of soil liner when required-->
1.6
feet
7. DESIGNED BY :Q�,.� APPROVED BY:
DATE: DATE: 3/5/9G
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:

31-�8�
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
01-29-2003
This plan has been prepared for:
M&C Nursery
Marshall Phillips
903 Wards Bridge
Warsaw, NC 28398
910-290-0111
This plan has been developed by:
Bill Thomas
Di plin Soil &- Maki -
PO Box 277
Kenansville, NC 28349
(,9110)2296-2120
�
2z6s::Z��
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenanc
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included
with this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:,� a
Technical Specialist Signature Date
--------------------------------------------- -- ----------
3US060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-29-2003 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S5
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid waste generated 678,432 gals/year by a
3,552 animal Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid operation. This production
facility has waste storage capacities of approximately- 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
B roadcast
1563
Incorporated
2684
Injected
2953
Irrigated
1698
Actual PAN
Applied (Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
1,753.92
700.587
-22,1>j
Note: 1n source ID, S means standard source, U means user -defined source.
308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-29-2003 Source Page 1 of 1

Narrative
This waste plan is written on a wetted acres foot print based on information form Eastern Irrigation &
Marshall Phillips.
J 308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed 01-29-2003 Narrative Page l of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for
each field. Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the
Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available,
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1462
l
NIA
Bonneau
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu
14621
31
NIA
Bonneau
Wheat, Grain
45 bu,
Soybeans, Nlanured, Double Crop
*25 bu.
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to
None
<2
soluble nutrient leaching
below the root zone.
2
Nloderate potential to
Nutrient klanacyement (5) should e planned,
& <=
contribute to soluble nutrient
leaching below the root zone.
High potent—jal to contribute to
Nutrient Management should be planned. ter conservation
soluble nutrient leaching
practices that improve the soils available water holding capacity and
> 10
below the root zone.
improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples are Cover
Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term
K
No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian -roust D tiers tj 1rT
308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-29-2003 PCS Page t of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the
number of acres of cropland nLeded to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops
to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being
supplied by manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estunate of the quantity of solid and
liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A
balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for
the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if
animal waste is being utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is
being applied. Soil tests should be used to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous
when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fett.
(Ihs1A)
PA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
Nutrient
Applied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
Source
Twal
Use.
Applic.
Applic.
1000
Tract 1
Field
1,D.
Soil Series
Acre
Acres
F Crop
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
ihs/A
saVA I
tans
1004 gals
tons
1462
1
S5
Ronncau
2.00
1.80
Wheat, Grain
45 hu.
911-3/31
104
0
*15
Irrig.
89
35.55
0
63.99
4.OD
1462
1
ti5
Bonneatt
2.00
1.80
Soybeans, Manured, Ihiuhle Crop
25 bu.
4/1 9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.94
0
71.90
0.00
1462
3
S5
Ronneau
8.00
7.48
Wheat, Grain
45hu.
9/1-3/31
104
0
*15
Irrig.
89
3555
0
265.92
0,00
1462
3
S5
ltunneau
8.0(1
7.48
tioyheans, Manured, DOLINe Crap
*25 hu.
4/1-9115
100
0
0
Irrig,
100
39.94
0
298.78
0.00
308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/29/03 WUT Page t

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
"Dotal
Acrc
Use
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Pert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
here)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
I Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs1A
1000
gal/A
tons
1000 gals
tans
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
700.39
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
678.43
Balance, 1000 gallons
-22.16
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
`
0.00
Notes. 1. In the tract column, symbol —means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol • means user entered data.
308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/29/03 WUT Page 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following
table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation
system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive
wastewater, It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in
any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
_Application R46
(incheslltnur)
Appli:ation Amount
(inches)
1462
1
Bonneau
0.60
0.72
1462
3
Bonneau
0.60
0.72
----------------------------------------------------------------------
308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-29-2003 TAF Page 1 of 1

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of
acres needed for sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are
based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and
the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of
the effluent. At clean.out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at
agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including
phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting*. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray
fields should not be used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to
load effluent application fields with high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent
cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous
is a concern Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
3 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Nursery Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Com 120 bu
130
13.16
9.04
18,08
27.12
Hay 6 ton RN,E.
300
26.32
4.52
9.04
13.36
Soy bean 40 bu
160
14,04
8A S
16.95
- - - - ^ _- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - d
308060 Database Version 10 Date Printed: 01-29-200 ; Ue Page I of I
5lud�

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of
storage capacity available at the end of each month of the plan Available storage
capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of
net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage
volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to
the design storage capacity of the facility. if the available storage capacity is greater than
the design storage capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of
nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative, the
estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the
structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the
waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Canacity
Source Name
I Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Darr)
StartDate
o9111
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
167
1
2
157
1
3
144
1
4
154
1
5
163
1
6
t73
1
7
180
t
8
169
1
9
180
I
10
t80
1
11
180
1
12
167 now
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
- 308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-29-2003 Capacity Page I of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1, Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that
reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land
to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure
an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change
in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available
moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of
management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per
acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5
tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided
grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see
USDA, MRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter
Strips).
S. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drif
from the land application field.
----------------------------------------------------------- ----------
308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/29/03 Specification Pa e 1

6, When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding,
waste will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland.
When waste is applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in
North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface
waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site
during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor
and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste
should also be considered.
lo, Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. .
Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to
planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto
which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine
farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited
on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to
perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the landowner.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
30S0G0 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed 1/29/03Specification Page 2

•r rtr� r.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
the fields have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed
waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site. _
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on
all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.).
Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are
limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should
be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
1s. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure
plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge,
Pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills.
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
2o; Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal
waste is used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only
be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste
during the crop season.
------------------------------------------ - ---
30S060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: I129103 Specification Page 3

21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be
tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are
applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other
restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen -based rate. Zinc
and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop
sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH
shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil
and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a
minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for
five (S) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
--------------------------------------------------------------- �__
308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/29/03 Specification Page 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 3
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 ibs/acre N at planting. Phosphors and potash
recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining N should be applied
during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely_ management of
diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 3
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medium leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the stray to achieve adequate plant
populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety- "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4
seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10
seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth
should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphors and potash recommended for the
soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally
grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 Ibs/acre N are sometimes made at
planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Titneh• management of weeds and insects is essential
for profitable double crop soybean production.
------------------------------------------------ ---- -
30060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-29-2003 CropNote Page I of

+;i{, ." .. . �...'„ ..."rT'^i� .,pr„cw• "r`^t+a•�. _ r , . V.' � r
Tract 1462
Feild 3 '
7.48,AC
' y5 rsi•ii.lti r e.,r ��
. �. h`r r. . Y f��%j�"F,-•li �; •'•llf r � y 1 #' �� rr"•� Y*i.•
Tract 1462
Field 1 ' �r�.••
1.8 AC
i sr
1 • ,'�i"�„ k ,,.ems ;'' i'�.•.
1 ,. \' �.,- a F t..i i �`-" r �' . i x'",a.�.+s�,+�i++r� ��r--.F ,t S, _ �. �f �•• .,r, . +
a � � .:S .�„�tt���C # ��+i ,# r it r t1,'.�, � �"yrSi•;'..,< r r
• fir : r r 4-- ,'S, �` �X;'r � � �,�^''i��;, -•r"7 r '� .
a '1,+. i';� rb M 't' r ?,5r Y.Lh'r� q9 i'y� r r-• by s� _ �
�! •; , �•� rtn S � � r'-,� 'S•� t, 1-,�iri�z-r{Y �7%� " 4!'('' T�. l'`�''� � . '� �•
• r • t7 ' �na;a }.f�? w?� „s. �. y 1 ` y t ^ 4,. �►, �},G s 9ti! 1 ` t , s1.� ,'. 't, .
.' `rc Kr'' � a •• �. .;�?.Y��., • 4.1 `l *' \ .•1�� h it
y'J i C .J.' � ., r�� ,� •' ,
;M r•r

112 Q,
:l�r PO '�'• phfll3p � �-� xw a� � � � Deity � ��'=....x` , w ,� �, .
y � c ' - : ve�r : hr ,(4i . R!' ,aW �' , ��Y �.��.+'• �y; J, yR.' .. *}� y. �.•T
� ,r :_ 'i h_r1d{�r�•, � ,q�� :.%7•. fir. C. ! .� �`77 1 �!'`�'": ler: "0' 0s sr 1•e'iRf 4 v•a� �r-c •h r� JQ ,2}00Tr..
"~
.tamer:406
`srence: Marshall Phillips
lel : 8000 Pivot pl essuz a (PSI) : 40
;hint Length- 267.64 Gallonage (GP?4) 150
1 Gun Radius: 54.E2 GPM/Acre: 1}•04
:al Acres: 7.49 App Rate (In/Day): 1.06
dal ?ter Len_th(fti Dia(in) spacing(in) Frofile Tire
aaaaa�aczaaa-aa=aaRa�aaaQ?aa=aa==aa^^----a=a=as--- �amowaaamaraaava=�aaacvssamaar�aaaa
C,C1 1 184.8 6 5/8 108 Standard 14.9 x 24 High
Float
0 1 82 6 5/8 110
ssure
PSI - 4Q
Ma;_sur�l at = Inlet
Pr.sssre Loss (PSIj = 1.43
_nklsr _nfigulaticn
Le` spiv_i-l! ri-rdipe = M XPT x 3/ 4 F NFT
variable Drop - Senrdn•ger,Hose,66,3/4 F H^se
Regulator - Valley, FSR, 20, All, 3/ 4 F PTPT
Slip Weight a Valley, 26, 2, Poly
Sprink-ler. a blelson, F.300Q, D6 - Rid, 3/4 F Acm
a �.n �umrnar1
U5a,, Starv_lard
ii�dal = IF=1�c ri P85
End,yun °ial -�-= 19_'E125
:. Chart Settings
.entar Dri-,s (Output RPMt = 34
X�:jto.L Ftar ueacy = 60H=
�n"real +searl.�,,,: Ratio = 32:1
Tins Si_e - 14.9 Y 24 High Float
.�:I15
Drain Sprinkler = Sanning_r Directional
LaRt Sprinkler r, -ez:aga - l;t
:r=e Last Coupler = YES
Ni nilitl= ► dilclirLa PSI = 6
Dr-, ;.1,=e1 tra•z:ks = Air
,ring Omr-ions:
t>:aP DiU. F3=2��7�tt
S!-.i_ Endg--m Nozzle,
S ip •• Endg:u-, Hardware
DO roc a sUp Zridgu_n Nc=:ls VaIvE
D•_ r,._t strip Ecroste-,pump Ha_fl?rule
C S -mot - l2/ :1/¢ 1 Pago 1

+9i#t xa.ls�..t'r'`YF.'dyc�IS'xya/•'�c: fk►•"-R'T�at'1. Fl,,u-,11
er:Na: lOQ$33$8-,,yT :* rjrra:i,
Lst : 00002068� "i',a: '�i:.RtCZg9l S ;a•• I��vt- l i� i si�V iwa:l� 1¢a: ` d.
Nance: t3a='3 all
Dist Sple Dist Nozzle Sias Cc:lov Wear. Drop RG(ju.latoi
From No La3t Pad Length PSI
Pivot Spa: �.•, `'y..
1 5.43 ---'Gauge
2 14.43 Plug
spsirikleL: Nelson k3000 Rotator
-------------------------------
3 r43 1 14 Lime D6 - Red 101 PSR ._GP. 21.70 1.56
4 32.43 9.00 Plug
5 41.43 2 18.00 15 LiFue/LavandeL D6 - Red 110 f3k 20A 21.67 1.82
6 49.93 8.50 Plug
59.34 3 1C.92 18 Gray D6 - Red 117 PSR. 20A 21.£3 2.58
8 66.76 8.42 P'lua
15._C: 1 1E.9': .1 Turq/Yellow D6 - Red lcl PSR. -C+A 21.56 3.49
0 84.26 9.40 Plug
1 93.2G 5 18.00 23 Yellow/Red DG - Red 122 PSR .20A 21.43 4.19
102.26 9.00 Plua
3 111.26 6 18.00 25 Red/White D6 - Red 17-1 PSR 20A 21.41 4.98
4 119.C6 8.40 Plug
5 128.07 16.81 27 Wlate/Blue D6 - Red 118 PSR 20A 21.33 5.80
6 136.49 8.42 Plug_
144.99 8 16-9= =? Blue/Dk Brotim D6 - Red 112 PSR 20A 21,22 6.72
8 153.9-4 9.00 Plug
9 16.9 9 18.01) 31 Dk Rrn/Orange D-6 - Red 1 U 2 PSR '0A 21 -08 7.6o
0 171.99 9.00 Plug
1 180.99 10 00 33 Orange/Dk C-zn DC - Red 91 PSP. .20A _0.9:4 8.68
2 184.78 3.79 Plug
L:i5.39 Tower rf=bar: 1 Span Length: 134.37
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 189.:*6 3.97 P'lu-.:
1 199.1U 11 Ld.11 34 Da;k Green D6 - Red 94 PSP, 10.79 9_19
5 208.37 ;-.17 Pluc
G 211.81 12.71 Plug
7 �17.37 1- 16.�? 36 Purples Do - P.ad 103 PSP. :?C1r %'o.6f) 1U.13
6 2126.51 9.14 Plug
9 225 S. C? 13 18.31 38 Black D6 -- Red 112 PS P. 20A 20.40 11.39
0 2219.23 3.54 P'lura
1 2.44.79 9-10 Plu,_7
2 =53.93 14 18.24 34 Dark Green D6 - Bad 120 PSR :?VA 20.85 9.21
2G3. 10 15 9.17 29 Blues/Uk BLUwzs E6 - Red 125 YSf± 21DA 21 .19 6.7_
Sprinkler: Sermingar ,Directional Spray
--------------------------------------
_ 266.C4 lu 3.54 13 wni`_8 33.Ju '7.37
267.64 -",verhiinu Spark Length: 82.26
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sarirkkler : Nelson P85 Endgun
-- --
,5 267.64 1" 1. !'i1 1 7/ 32 37. cad 49 . Q0
- -Ln r.=L Settings:-ozvmrrl Angla: 45 Reverse Angle: 50
150.44
lar Sprinkler Chart - 11/20/Uo Paae 1

C�ww^Jtomit iiVa�ne' •kMnrsh�IlPhl
TWA
"I
Machlne I.D. 10083388
PIVOT
state
OH Length 82 LRDU G&RPM
55.6
Distance to LRDU 185 LRDU Tire Code
HFL
EG Throw 55 Wheel GB -Ratio
52
GPM 150 Frequency (Hz)
60
Degr-s of Rotation 360 Irrigated Acres
7.5
% End Gun On 100% GPM / Acre
20.1
End Gun GPM 46.9 Inches / Day
1.06
LRDU Speed, FVMin 12.10 Measured Speed in Ft/min (apt)=
0.00
% Timer Hrs per Inches per
Setting Revolution Ravolutlon
100 1.6
0.07
90 1.8
0,08
8o 2.0
0.09
70 2.3
0.10
60 2.7
0.12
50 3.2
0.14
40 4.0
0.1 a
30 5.3
0.24
20 8.0
0.35
18 8.9
0.39
16 10.0
0.44
14 11.4
0.51
12 13.3
0.59
10 16.0
0.71
8 20.0
0.89
6 26.7
1.18
5 32.0
1.42
4 40.0
1.77
3 53.4
2.38
2 80.1
3.55
1 160.1
7.09
Because the above information is based upon variables
(end gun range, psi, .gpm , that are produced by the customer
and other parties which we cannot verify, Valmont cannot
guarantee'the accuracy of the above conclusions.
Furthermore, in this program, Valmont makes no representations
or recommendations as to percentage timer setting, water
application rates, and other similar farm management decisions.

jeReinke
MORE RIGHT THAN RAID{
www. reinke. oom • 868-365-738 9
{�c.res •r•�% S''Si� $G.���� �j3J �l�crrle I
1
f
i
"Our mission... to exceed our customers'
expectations of quality, service, and innovation."

,- -. ":, C-

a
scale i inch = 200 feet.
3,8' wetted

The 80 Series are Senninger's largest impact sprinklers
They are designed for maxlmum elYlclencyat high flow rates
• Outlasts and casts less than brass sprinklers
• Built for strength and durability using
`.,.
high -impact engineering -grade thermoplastics
and top quality stainless steel components
• Built-in hex wrench for easy
in -the -field maintenance
• Standard lowar boa ring pipe thread.-
1114"NPT mate (female also available)
• Flo w rates: 23.6 to 106.8 gpm
(1.5116 6.62Lls)
8025211,-i-11/411 All
• 250 angle for maximum
distance of throw
• Single nozzle design
minimizes clogging
V 8025RD-1.1114" M
U.S. - Diameter (feet)
SPRINKLER (psi) 35 40 45 L 50 55 60 65 70 75
BASE PRESSURE
024 Nozzle - (3t8-)
Flow (gpm) 23.6 25.2 28.7 28.2 29.8 30.9 32.t 33.3 34.5
Diam. at 1.5' height (loot) 128 134 139 144 149 154 157 159 160
Diam. at 6.0' height (feet) 147 152 156 159 162 164 166 168 170
026 Nozzle - (13132-)
Flow (gpm)
27.4
29.3
31.0
32.7
34.3
35.9
37.3
38.7
40.1
Diam. at 14' height (loot)
136
142
147
152
157
161
164
166
168
Diam. at 8.0' height (feet)
152
157
161
194
167
169
171
173
175
020 Houk - (7116')
Flow (gpm)
31.6
33.9
36.0
38.0
39.8
41.6
43.3
44.9
46.5
Diem. at 1.6 height (feet)
142
148
153
157
161
168
169
171
173
Diam. at WY height (feet)
156
161
165
168
171
173
175
177
179
030 Nozzle - (15/32-)
Flow (gpm)
36.1
38.8
40.9
43.1
45.2
47.2
49.2
51.0
62.8
Diam. at 1.5' height (feet)
147
153
158
162
166
170
173
175
178
Diam. at 6,0' height (feet)
160
165
169
172
175
177
179
181
183
032 Nozzle - (112-)
Flow (gpm)
41.0
43.9
48.5
49.0
51.4
53.7
55.9
58A
60.1
Diam. at 1.5' height (toot)
150
156
161
165
169
173
176
179
183
Diam. at 6,0' height (tool)
164
169
173
176
179
181
183
185
187
034 Nozzle - (17132')
Flow (gpm)
46.3
49.5
525
55.4
58.1
60.7
63.1
65.5
67.8
Diam. at 1.5' height (feet)
153
159
164
168
172
176
180
183
188
Diam. at 5.0' height {feet)
157
172
178
179
182
184
186
168
190
038 Nozzle - (2118-)
Flow (gpm) 51.9
56.5
58.9
62.1
65.1
68.0
70.8
73.5
7(.0
Diam, at t.5' height (toot) 155
161
166
170
174
178
183
187
190
Dlam. at 6.0' height (fool 170
; . 175 '
179
182
185
187
189
191
193
5&0
.59.9.
63.5
66.9
70.2
73.3
76.3
79.2
W-0
tiDiam pl`! helghl:V*Y157
183'i
IBB
172
176
180
185
190
AN '
�e)1tTC, l GAY holcht Ilool)'A,'s178.
1T8 1
182
185
1B8
190
192
194
f",Ig8 ;.
71.1 75.0 78.7 82.1 85.5 815.7 F81
170 174 178 182 187 192 lib
184 187 190 192 194 196 is
METRIC - Diameter (motors)
(bar) 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 !
(Psi) 36.25 4350 50.75 MOO 65.25 72 $0
024 Nozzle - (9.53 mm)
(US) 1.51 1.66 1.79 1.91 2.03 2.14
0.5 m (m) 39.5 41.9 44.1 46.3 47.9 48.6
2.0 m (m) 45.2 47.2 48.6 49.7 50.6 . 51.5
026 Nozzle - (10,32 mm)
(Us)
1.76
1.92
2.08
2.22
2.36
2.48
0.5 m (m)
41.9
44.4
46.6
-.48.6
50.0
50.9
2.0 m (m)
46.7
48.7
50.1
51.3
52.2
53.0
028 Nozzle - (11.11 mm)
(Us)
2.04
2.23
2.41
2.58
2.73
2.88
0.5 m (m)
43.7
46.2
48.0
50.0
51.5
52.4
2.0 m (m)
47.9
49.9
51.3
52.5
53.4
54.3
030 Nozzle - (11.91 mm)
(Us)
2.31
2.53
2.74
2.93
3.10
3.27
0.$ m (m)
45.3
47.7
49.6
51.3
52.8
53.8
2.0 in (m)
49.2
51.1
52.6
53.7
54.6
55.5
032 Nozzle - (12.7 mm)
(US) 2.63 2.68
3,11
3.33
3.53
3.72
0.5 m (m) 46.2 46.6
50.5
52.2
53.7
55.2
2,0 m (m) 60.4 52.4
53.8
54.9
55.8
68.7
034 Nozzle - (13.49 mm)
(US) 2.97 3.25
3.51
3.76
3,99
4.20
0.5 m (m) 47.1 49.5
51.4
53.2
54.9
56,2
2.0 m (m) 51.3 53.3
64.7
55.8
56.7
57.6
030 Nozzle - (14.29 mm)
(Us) 3.33 3.65
3.94
4.21
4.47
4.71
0.5 m (m) 47.7 50.1
52.0
53.8
55.8
57.5
2.0 m (m) SZ2 54.2
55.6
56.8
57.6
58.5
:.08 Nozzle-(15.08 mm)
3.59 ; 3.93
4.25
4,54
4.82
5.08
50.8
52.6
54.4
$8.5
58.2
55.1
56.5
57.7
58.6
59.4
-0401Naale = (18 88 mm}
(J fX, - ,?„7
4.4t
4.78
5.09
5.40
5 69
_
51.4
$3.255.0
57.t
58 8t55.7
01116�
. .7-
57.1
58.3
592
600
Diameters shown are for standard straight bore nozzfes and stream stra ghtening vanes.
Other n=10 sizes are available; cdzsuM factory for spedRc performance data.
Stream heights range from 12.5.28.0 R (3.8 - 8.5 m) above nozzle based orr pressure and nozzle size.
Page 14 - Senninger Inrgation Inc. [phone] - Solid -Set Catalog
sy„

Addendum To Marshall Philips WUP Dated 3J13/03
14 acres of tract 3218 field 2 planted in wheat may have waste applied at the following rates:
Soil Type AuB
Wheat Feb. -Mar. 90 lbs. N/Ac
Bill Thomas Date
Landowner Date

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P• E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
Marshall H. Phillips
M & C Nursery
903 Wards -Bridge Road
Warsaw NC 28398
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310787
M & C Nursery
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin County
Dear Marshall H. Phillips:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
• Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date -of -the Swine Waste -Operation General
Permit AWG100000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Pernut.
In accordance with your application received on March 7, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued,to Marshall
H. Phillips, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS310787 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the M & C Nursery, located in Duplin County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 3552 Wean to Feeder swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu ENR
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, SC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you *ish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at-[phone].-- Ifyouneed additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
Sincerely,
v
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Duplin County Health Department
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS310787
NDPU Files

r�
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste
This plan has been prepared for:
M&C Nursery
Marshall Phillips
903 Wards Bridge
Warsaw, NC 28398
910-290-0111
01-29-2003
Utilizatiofi�
This plan has been developed by:
t-
Bill Thomas
Diiplin Soil & Water
PO Box 277
Kenansville, NC 28349
(910)r/2/96-2120
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenanc
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included
with this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer)
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: r _.- .._
a
Technical Specialist Signature Date
- - - ^ T - 308060 Database Version 2.0Date Printed: 01-29-2003 Cover Page I

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S5
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid waste generated 678,432 gals/year by a
3,552 animal Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid operation. This production
facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
1563
Incorporated
2684
Injected
2955
Irrigated
1698
Actual PAN
Applied (Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
1,753.92
700,587
-22,155
--------------------_-----___------------ --r-e.----�---_------------
Note: Insource [D, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-29-2003 Source Page 1 of 1

Narrative
This waste plan is written on a wetted acres foot print based on information form Eastern Irrigation &
Marshall Phillips.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
30R060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-29-2003 Narrative Page 1 of 1

v�
The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for
each field. Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the
Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1462
t
NIA
Sonneau
Wheat, Grain
45 bu,
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 W.
1462
3
NIA
13onneau
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
•25 bu.
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
ow —Potential to contributelNutrient
None
<2
soluble nutrient leaching
below the root zone.
> = 2
Moderate potentialto
anagement ) sFo'uld be planned.
& —
contribute to soluble nutrient
leaching below the root zone,
High potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management should be planned. ter conservation
soluble nutrient leaching
practices that improve the soils available water holding capacity and
> IO
below the root zone.
improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples are Cover
Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term
No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-29-2003 PCS Page I of I
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the
number of acres of cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops
to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being
supplied by manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid -and
liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A
balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for
the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if
animal waste is being utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is
being applied. Soil tests should be used to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous
when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
(lbs1A)
PA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
Nutrient
Applied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
Source
Total
Use.
Applic.
Applic,
1000
Tract
I Field
LD.
Soil Series
Acre
Acres
Crop
Period
N
N
N
Method
IbslA
eal/A
Eons
1000 gals
tans
1462
1
S5
Bonneau
2.00
1.80
Wheat, Grain
911-3131
104
0
*15
brig.
89
35.55
0
63.99
0,00
1462
1
S5
Bonneau
2.00
1.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
145bu.
411-9115
100
0
0
brig.
l00
39.94
0
71.90
0.00
1462
3
Si
Bonneau
8.00
7.48
Wheat, Grain
911-3131
104
0
*15
brig.
89
35.55
0
265.92
0.00
1462
3
S5
Bonneau
9.00
7.4$
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
*25 bu.
411-9115
1001
0
01
brig.
1001
39,941
01
298.78
0.00
308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/29/03 WUT Page 1

Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract
Field
Source
1.13-
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYI-
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
pert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
sal/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
700.59
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
678.43
Balance, 1000 gallons
-22,16
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tons
% :
0.00
Balance, tons
'..
0.00
Notes: L In the tract column, symbol — means leased, otherwise, owned.
2- Symbol * means user entered data.
--- --- - --- --- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - --- -
308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/29/03 WUT Page 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following
table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation
system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive
wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in
any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Trail
Field
Soil Series
Application Rato
(incheslhour)
.- J)Plicutiotn Atnount
(inches)
1462
1
Bonneau
0,60
0.72
1462
3
Bonneau
0.60
0.72
--- -----------------------------------------
308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-29-2003 IAF Page I of I

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of
acres needed for sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are
based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and
the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of
the effluent. At clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at
agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including
phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray
fields should not be used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to
load effluent application fields with high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent
cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous
is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Ma%imum
PA-N Rate
Iblac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gallac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accunntlat.ion
Mininuuu Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Nursery Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
9.04
18,08
27.12
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
4,52
9.04
13.56
Soybean 40 hit
160
14.04
8.48
16.95
25.43
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-29-200 3 Sludge Page 1 of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of
storage capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage
capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of
net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage
volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to
the design storage capacity of the facility. if the available storage capacity is greater than
the design storage capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of
nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative, the
estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the
structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the
waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
Swine Nursery Lagoon Li uid
Design Storage Capacity Days)
Start Date
09/11
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
167
1
2
157
1
3
144
1
4
15=4
1
5
163
1
6
173
1
7
180
1
8
169
1
9
180
1
10
190
1
11
180
1
12
t67
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of cacti month.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-29-2003 Capacity Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that
reaches surface water is prohibited.
?. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land
to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure
an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change
in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available
moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of
management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per
acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5
tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided
grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter
Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drif
from the land application field.
------ -----------------------------------------------------p------
308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: t/29/03 Specification Page t

6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding,
waste will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland.
When waste is applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in
North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface
waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site
during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor
and flies.
g. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste
should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. _
Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to
planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto
which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine
farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited
on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to
perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to `yells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by -the landowner.
T 308060 Database Version 2,0 Date Printed 1/29/03 Specification Page 2

14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways,
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
the fields have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed
waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on
all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.).
Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are
limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should
be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure
plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge,
pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills.
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
2.p. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal
waste is used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only
be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste
during the crop season.
---------------------------------------------------------- p b
308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/29/03 Specification Page 3

21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be
tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are
applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other
restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc
and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop
sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH
shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil
and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a
minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for
five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
J 308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed 1/29/03 Specification Paige 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 3
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 112" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 301bs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash
recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining N should be applied
during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of
diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 3
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medium leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate plant
populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4
seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10
seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding -depth
should be 1-1 112" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the
soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally
grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at
planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential
for profitable double crop soybean production.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
308060 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-29-2003 Crop Note Page 1 of 1

Tract 1462
Feild 3
7.48 AC
Tract 1462
Field 1�
1.8 AC
III

w}}-ent'mi� derv► 4r ,' Fy tr :. �
10/11/2000*�,
ter P4: Nc
V,
00002069�s ek`ars }ea
/F,Pi.4fiERT1 -T
:toner: --___ _
'erence: Marshall Phillips .
• ..' . :'s I i. ice' ta
lei:
8000
Pivot Pre:'r:uLe (PSI):
40
:tine Length:
267.64
Gallonage (GPM):
150
1 Gun Radius:
54.E2
GPM/Acrs:
13.04
:al Acres:
7.49
App Rate (In/Day):
.1.06
_, r
,dal ;ty Length(=t) 1)ia1inI Spacing(in) FrofilG Tir-•
«,sam:e�aaaara=a�=eaiaamaaaaacga=eras----�aceaatraaamamaacaarraaavc=�ammaaa mcaa=amain
100 1 184.E 6 5/8 108 Standard 14.9 x 24 High
Float
loci 1 • 82 6 5/2 110
assure
PSI = 4U
mea;:ut•�d at = Inlet
Pressure Loss SPSIi = 1.43
4nkler Configuration
:let SPL%ciny U-pipt, a Valley,E,Gu1var,ized,3/4 M 1.1FT x 3/4 F NPT
Variable Drop = SenrirLger,Hose, FSU,3/4 F Hcs=
Regulator a Valley,PSR,20,A11,3!4 F NPT
Slip Weight = Valley„6,2,PolV
SpLillkleL = Nelson,R300Q,D6 - Red, �1/4 F Acme
Ig-m Sunmary
Ut aqe = Standard
M'Aal - Nelson P85
Endgun 'dal , ;-� = 1926125
ter Chart Settings
Center Driv= (Output RPMi = 34
�tuto-L FLequeucy = 60H=
;,tnsel Gearbox Ratio = :12:1
Tires Si=e - 14.9 x y4 High Float
ivris
Drain Sprinkler = Sanninger Directional
Last Sprinkler Coverage - ]ft
Use Last Coupler = YES
_•iininmmLL Mainline PSI = 6
Dr tfli_el tracks - AJ<j
F'ping Options:
13:.-l.G L`t Ur Hiii'�Jitt s
S?iI, Endg•:sn T7,rile
Ship End-7un Hardware
Do nct ship Erdgun Ara=_ls Val c-
D'_- ship Boost_zpump Ha-'dw- liµ
?r S::=at - 1r/20/00 Page 1

G 9r .. .. - F n �7 7 1h..t TI'!R .r r'• S T'y 1 f . - - ,.
laicNG:s<10Q83388"�fii?'^1yk",t�'�'�'f^1iGtidoPtiR�}}MO.,?`!w F i�`c's*Is
'.000020fi8/TERN+R1tI GATION
,;Ir -r
cee
Dist Spk List Nozzle Size Colon weaL DrGp RayuLntot Spk
From No Laat Pad Length PSI GPTl,• "�",�
Pivot Sgh''4,7.E r'4
1 5 . 43 Gauge
2 14.43 Plug
sptinklei: Nelson R3000 Rotator
3 �3.43 1 14 Lime D6 - Red 101 PSR 20A 21.70 1.56
4 32.43 9.00 Plug
5 41.43 2 18.00 15 Limp/LavercdeL D6 - Red 110 PSN. 20A 21.67 1.82
6 49.93 8.50 Plug
lr-52 18 srav DG - Red 117 PSR .20A .21.63 2.58
8 66-76 8.42 Plulr
715.1-.16 4 1El. 9. 's'1 Turq/Yellow D6 - Red 121 PSR _0A 21.56 3.49
0 E4.26 9.00 Plug
.1 93.26 5 18.00 23 Yellow/Red DC - Red 122 PSR 20A 21.48 4.19
.' 102.26 9.00 Plug
3 111.26 6 18.00 25- Red/White Dn - Red 121 PSR ?GA 21.41 4.98
,4 119.Gu' 8.40 Plug
.5 128.07 1 i6,81 27 White/Blue DU - Red 118 PSR 0A 21.33 5.80
,6 136.49 8.42 Plug
144.99 8 1G.92 _9 Blue/Dk Broc,m D6 -- Rad 112 PSR 20A _1.7? 6,72
3 153.99 9,00 Plug
.9 16:.'.99 9 i8.UU 31 Dk Drn/Orange D6 - Red IU_' PSR 'CA 21.03 7.60
:0 1711.99 9.00 Plug
:1 1SO.99 10 i8.00 33 Orange/D), Gzn D6 - Red 91 PSP. ?0A 20.E+4 3.&F�
2 184.76 3.79 Plug
185.39 Tower Plumber: 1 Span Length: 134.37
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:,3 109.96 8.97 Plug
'4 199.1U 11 18.11 34 Dark Green D6 - Fred 94 PSR 20A c0.79 9.19
:5 2C,8.?7 9.17 Plums
:G 211.81 12.71 Plug
'.7 217.37 lZ' 18._7 36 Purple D6 - Red 103 F'SR :)-UA 2U.4U 1U.13
'8 2=6.51 9.14 Plug
19 225.v9 13 18.31 38 Black D6 - Red 11_ PSR .20A -70.40 11.39
;0 239.'.3 3.54 Pluu
;1 244.79 °-10 Plug_
;2 253.91, 14 18.24 34 Dark Green D6 - Red 120 PSR 20A 20.85 9.21
:3 263.10 15 9.17 29 Slue/Dk BromL D6 - Red 125 PSP. ?GA 21.19 6.7.2
Sprinkler: Senninger Directional Spray
;4 -uu.G$ 16 3.54 13 White 38.56 7.37
267.64 Ovez:Kaug Spam Length: 82.26
-- -
Smririlcler : Nelson PS"'Endqun - ------____
5 64 17 1 . UU 1!/ 32 ^} 37.88 45 .Or}
:CrUn Settings: Forward Angle: 45' Re1rerse Angle: $0
150.44
let Sprinklez --hart - 12/2D/+,U - - Pace 1

t'r z +. ', A E%r y f id i.ii c k� r C �'T; °) '"► rp
' •-� .;ya�ry"` 3.,�� li .rM1��Y.�nz+• rrr'45wb,- y ��,� �:'i-nry.. i..,+•.t ;., r
�a.^h�s:Yw_'•A'r�
�
Cua#Phillips
Add.ras .-
city .;r.. .
Machine I.D. 10083388
4I � :-i � ��'3i,3ii•�'�.�z'1'� ti'w.�y '+. f r+L����? y� �'i�� �f'r"� z� _ ,,gi�rtt lr 'K. k� ���4` ' a�
'yy. Y ��i- �f tr - " ._- 1 i@ ��. 9 7.� A �a�•. �:' ll,,.S�:
State
PIVOT
OH Length
82
LRDU G&RPM
55.6
Distance to LRDU
185
LRDU Tire Code
HFL
EG Throw
55
wheel GS-Ratio
52
GPM
150
Frequency (Hz)
60
Degrees of Rotation
360
Irrigated Acres
7.5
% End Gun On
100%
GPM / Acre
20.1
End Gun GPM
46.9
incites / Day
1.06
LRDU Speed, FVMin
12.10
Measured Speed in Ftlmin (opt)=
0.00
% Timer
Hm per
Inches per
Setting
Revolution
Revolution
100
1.6
0.07
90
1.8
0.08
80
2.0
0.09
70
2.3
0.10
60
2.7
0.12
50
3.2
0.14
40
4.0
0.18
30
5.3
0.24
20
8.0
0.35
18
8.9
0.39
16
10.0
0.44
14
11.4
0.51
12
13.3
0.59
10
16.0
0.71
8
20.0
0.89
6
26.7
1.18
5
32.0
1.42
4
40.0
1.77
3
53.4
2.36
2
80.1
3.55
1
160.1
7.09
Because the above information is based upon variables
(end gun range, psi, gpm), that are produced by the customer
and other parties which we cannot verify, Valmont cannot
guarantee'the accuracy of the above conclusions.
Furthermore, in this program, Valmont makes no representations
or recommendations as to percentage timer setting, water
application rates, and other similar farm management decisions.

*Reinke
MORE RIGHT THAN RAIN
wwwreinke. cam - 866-365-7361
W�W,
"Our MSsion_ to exceed our customers'
expectations of qualify, service, and innovation.'

_z

K
7
scale 1 inch = 200 feet.
3.8' wetted
�-,% -,t, --

SPRINKLER (psi)
BASE PRESSURE
#24 Nozzle - (3/8')
Flow (gpm)
Diam. at 1.5' height (feet)
Diam. at 6.0' height (lost)
#26 Nozzle - (13132')
Flow (gpm)
Diam. at 1.5' height (feet)
Diam. at 6.0' height (feet)
The 80 Serles are Senninger'g largest impact sprinklers.
They are des/gned for maximum efficlency at high flow rates.
• Outlasts and costs less than brass sprinklers
• Built for strength and durability using
high -impact engineering -grade thermoplastics y .
and top quality stainless steel components
• Built-in hex wrench for easy
in -the -field maintenance'
Standard lower bearing pipe thread,•
1 t/4"NPT male (female also available)
• Flow rates: 23.6 to 106.8 gpm
(1.51 to 6.62Us) 8025RD-1-1'14" M
V 8025RD-1-1'14" M
U.S. - Diameter (feet)
35 40 . 45 .. 50 , 55 . ' 60 65 70 75
23.6 25.2 28.7 282 29.6 30.9 32.1 33.3 34.6
128 134 139 144 149 ,154 .157 159 160
147 152 '156 159 162 164 168 168 170
27.4 29.3 31.0 32.7 34.3 35.9 ' 37.3 38.7 40.1
136 142 147 162 167 161 164 166 168
152 167 161 164 167 169 171 173 175
028 Nozzle - (7/16")
Flow (gpm)
31.8
33.9
36.0
38.0
39.8
41.6
43.3
44.9
46.5
Diam. at 1.5' height (feet)
142
148
153
157
lei
We
169
171
t73
Diam. at BA' height (feet)
156
161
185
168
171
173
175
177
179
#30 Nozzle -(ISM-)
Flow (gpm)
36.1
38.6
40.9
43.1
45.2
47.2
49.2
51.0
52.8
Oiam. at 1.6' height (feet)
147
153
158
162
186
170
173
175
178
Diam. at 6.(r height (feet)
160
165
169
172
175
177
179
18t
183
932 Nozzle - Of2l )
Flow (gpm)
41.0
43.9
46.5
49.0
51.4
53.7
55.0
58.0
60.1
Diam. at 1.5' height (feel)
160
166
161
166
169
173
176
179
183
Diam. at 8.0' height (feet)
164
169
173
176
179
181
183
165
167
#34 'Nozzle - (17132-) .
Flow (gpm)
46.3
49.5
52.5
55.4
56.1
60.7
63.1
65.5
97.8
Diam. at 1.6' height (feet)
153
159
164
168
172
176
180
183
186
Diam, at 6.0' height (feet)
167
172 .
176
179
182
184
186
188
190
426 Nozzle - (W16-)
i
"Floti6 (gpm)
61.9
.65.5,
58.9
62.1
65.1
68.0
70.8
73.5
. 76.0
Diam. at t S'. height (feet)
155
_161.
166
170
174
178
183
187
- 190 ;
D18111. a fl:h,helght (feet)
Iil c 175
179
182
185
187
189
191
193
63.5 68.9 70.2 73.3 76.3 79.2
168 172 176 180 185 190
182 185 188 190 192 194
(bar)
6-1)
• 250 angle
distance o
• Single noz
minimizes
METRIC • Diameter (meters)
2.3 3.0 3.6 4.0 4.56.0 .1
3e.25 43.50 50.75 $8.010 65.25 ' 72.501
024 Nozzle - (9.53 min)
2
(US) 1.51 1.66
1.79
1.91
.2.03
2.14
0.5 m (m) 39.5 41.9
44.1
46.3
. 47.9
48.6 i
2.0 m (m) 45.2 47.2
48.8
49.7
50.8
51.5
026 Nozzle - (10.32 mm)
(Us) 1.76 1.92
2.06
2.22
2.36
2.48
0.5 m (m) 41.9 44.4
46.6 - 48.8
60.0
50.9
2.0 m (m) 46.7 48.7
50.1
51.3
62.2
53.0
#28 Nozzle - (11.11 mm)
(Us) 2.04 2.23
2.41
2.58
2.73
2.88
0.5 m (m) 43.7 46.2
48.0
50.0
51.5
52.4
2.0 m (m) 47.9 49.9
51.3
52.5
53.4
54.3
N30 Nozzle - (11.91 mm)
(US) 2.31 2.53
2.74
2.93
3.10
3.27
0.5 m (m) 45.3 47.7
49.6
51.3
52.8
53.8
2.0 m (m) 49.2 51.1
52.8
53.7
54.6
55.5
#32 Nozzle, - (12.7 m m)
(lie) 2.63 2.88
3.11
3.33
3.53
3.72
0.5 m (m) 46.2 46.6
60.5
62.2
53.7
55.2
2.0 m (m) 50.4 92.4
53.8
54.9
55.8
66.7
034 Nozzle - 113.49 mm)
(Us) 2.97 3.25
3.51
3.76
3.99
4.20
0.5 m (m) 47.1 49.5
51.4
53.2
64.9
56.2
2.0 m (m) 51.3 { 53.3
54,7
55.8
66.7
57.6
036 Nozzle - (14.29 mm)
(Lis) ., ;.. 3.33 , 3.65
3.94
4.21
4.47
4.71
-.0.5 m (m) 47.7 l 50.1
52.0
53.8
55.8
57.5
201in (m) `-52.21 54.2
55.8
56.8
57.6
58.5
#38 Nozzle-(15.09 mm)
(Lis) p~� 3.59 , 3.93
4.25
4.54
4,82
5,08
*�
r ra 0,b" (Ai 48 3 50.8
52.6
64.4
56.5
58.2
'120 m,(mj,691 55.1
58.5
-
57.7
58.6
59.4 s'
''#40Ngs>ile(1686
mm)
f;
87.1 71.1 75.0 78.7 92.1 85.5 88.7 91.8' t1i6)' e'k h 4.41 4.76 5.09 5.40 5.69
1 170 174 178 182 187 192 .194 �0.�`4rttm) 51.4 53.2 55.0 57.1 58,8
�. �..� .,., rt.t
B0 1" 187 190 �192V 194 198 2,0"rR{� - * 55,7 M57.1 583 59.2 60.0
Aiamelers shown are far sfandard stmVhl bore nozzles and stream straightening vanes.
Olhernoa/e sizes are available; consult factory forspeariic performance data.
Stream halghls range from 12.5.28.011 (3.8 - 8.5 m) above nozzle based on pressure and nozzle size.
Page 14 - Senninger Irrigation Inc. [phone] - Solid --Set Catalog

State of North Carolina
W'A
Department of EnvironmentEBY:
•
and Natural Resources
RE��
Division of Water Quality
2901
_�-
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 15, 2001
Marshall H. Phillips
M & C Nursery
903 Wards Bridge Road
Warsaw NC 28398
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310787
M & C Nursery
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin County
Dear Marshall Phillips:
In accordance with your application received on December 28, 2000, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Marshall H. Phillips, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General
Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not
limited to, the management of animal waste from the M & C Nursery, located in Duplin County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 3552 Wean to Feeder and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and Iimitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS310787
M & C Nursery {
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership. "
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact JR Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
err T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County Health Department
Wilm.ingtcm:igegibnall- ffZe, ,Water Quality'�S.egio"
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

I.
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
RECEIVED
1.1 Facility Name: M & C Nurser
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Marshall H. Phillips
1.3 Mailing address: 903 Wards Bridge Road WATER QUALITY SECTION
City, State: Warsaw NC Zip: 28398 Noti-rise X9e
Telephone Number (include area code): 910-293-7805
1.4 County where facility is located:
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): North of Kenansville. On North side of SR 1377, 0.5 miles
East of SR 1301,
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's 1 integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Carroll's Foods, Inc.
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation:
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: �31_... (county number); 787 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Swine operation
Wean to Feeder
3552- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? ZYes; [::]no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed,
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 7/7/99 Page 1 of 4 31 - 787

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 5.3
2.4 Number lagoo s/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable): l
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or N® (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
®roar NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? S� � .0 T. 4
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? Z 4V. r' r� �—
%•� #� C 7-1-7J,
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST Z-m . 4- '` I- /r' 2-000
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP far permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
✓ 3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
d 3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
4 3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 7/7/99 Page 2 of 4 31- 787

W.
- Facility Number: 31 - 787
Facility Name: M & C Nursery
4. APPLICANT'S CE IFI ATION:
I, 4r.%�f��� / '{I � f (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for Re G &V_rlarY (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be return me as in fete JJ��'�
Signature Date /, _2' 2,
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I,
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
R9CEIVED
t#A► [ 0 aw
WATER QUAUTY SECTION
Non -Discharge Permittlrg
FORM: AWO-G-E 7/7/99 Page 3 of 4 31- 787

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: MARSHALL 2HILLIPS
Location: 903 WARDS BRIDGE RD
WARSAW NC 28398
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: New Wean to Feeder Swine
Number of Animals: 3552.00 pigs
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown
and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more
nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or
when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may
result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page:

J
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
S. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems..
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain'pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with-15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
3552 pigs x .40 tons waste/pigs/year = 1420.8 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
3552 pigs x .48 lbs FAN/pigs/Year = 1704.96 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

r
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION -PLAN
TABLE l: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
1462
1
AUB
BH
5.5
275
1.32
363
I
+APR-
OCT15th
1462
166
1-1
1
�SG
11
�50
I
11.32
+OCT15th-APR
1462
3
JAU11
IC
I
175
�78.75
115
16.0
1472.5
+MAR-
JUN
1462
�-3
MAR
JAUB
JW
I
14S
190 1
�6.0
�540
+OCT-
1462
DSB
1-3
JAUB
I
118
172
1
16.0
1432
+JUN-
SEPT 15
END
I
TOTAL11873.5
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
+ - Dates shown reflect optimum uptake periods for nutrients. Waste
appilcation may begin up to thirty(30) days prior to planting or
green -up of forages, and extend past optimum dates shown if
plant growth, pumping conditions, and PAN loading rates permit.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts'of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE.2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with -adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
3207
1
AUB
BH
5.5
275
2.8
770
+APR=
OCT15th
3207 1-1
+OCT15th-APR
END
SG 11 150
2.8 1140
TOTAL 1910
- - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
+ - Dates shown reflect optimum uptake periods for nutrients. Waste
application may begin up to thirty(30) days prior to planting or
green -up of forages, and extend past optimum dates shown if
plant growth, pumping conditions, and PAN loading rates permit.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized.' Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS—HAY
TONS
50
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
DSB
DOUBLE CROPPED SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
4
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
AC
50
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
*a
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
WETTABLE
LBS AW N USED
_ACRES
7.32
1873.5
2.8
910
10.12
2783.5
* BALANCE
—1078.54
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: • 5

JPF' /
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich end will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 269.952 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 1349.76
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 4.4992 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 10.79808 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 2511 depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface -irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of 7iitrcgen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
j
jApplication
RatelApplic. Amount
Cract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
(in/hr)
(inches)
L462
11 I
AUB
BH
f .5
I *1
L462
3
AUB
I C
I .5
*1
L462
-1
SG
.5
*1
1462
-3 $
AUB
DSB
.5
*1
1462
I --3
AUB
j w
.5
*1
3207
11 I
AUB
I BH
.5
I *1
3207
-1 I
t
, SG
I .5.
*1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables I and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION_.
LLL ACRES IN TABLE ONE(1) AND TWO(2) OF THIS WUP ARE BASED ON AN IRRIGATION
)ESIGN DONE BY FLOYD ADAMS PE.
'HIS WUP AS WRITTEN WILL ACCOMODATE THE NUTRIENT BUDGET FOR THIS NURSERY
)PERATION WITH PUMPING ON THE BERMUDA AND OVERSEED AND ANY ONE OF THE ROW CROPS
IE:CORN, WHEAT OR SOYBEANS).
IR PHILLIPS HAS VERBAL PERMISSION TO PUMP ON TRACT 3218 FIELD TWO(2) AND TRACT
144 FIELD ONE(1). THE SOIL TYPE ON THESE FIELDS IS AUB. THE APPLICATION RATE
ND AMOUNT ARE 0.5 AND 1.0 RESPECTIVELY. THE CROPS LISTED BELOW MAY AT TIMES
�E USED FOR PUMPING.
.LL SPRAY APPLICATION TIMES FOR ROW CROPS MAY BE TAKEN FROM TABLE ONE OF THIS
IUP .
'-3218 APPROX.
CORN
WHEAT
SOYBEANS
'-3144 APPROX.
CORN
WHEAT
SOYBEANS
18.0 IRRIGATED ACRES
73.75lbs N/AC
90.01bs N/AC
100.01bs N/AC
8.0 IRRIGATED ACRES
73.75lbs N/AC
90.O1bs N/AC
100.01bs N/AC
Page: 8

1.
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. when applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal.waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED _SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a'discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
x$, If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page; 11

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:M&C NURSERY(31-787)
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25--year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: MARSHALL PHILLIPS
(Please print}
Signature: Allk/ Date:
Name of Manager(If different from owner):_
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print) BILLY W. HOUSTON
Affiliation:DUPLIN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Phone No. 910-296-2120
Address (Agency): PO BOX 219
KENANSVILLE NC 28349
s
Signature: 13 Date-. �� ^� �- D u
Page: 12

d
DENNIS MATHIS hereby give youMARSHALL PHILLI?S
, ,
(landowner)p (producer)
p � E. IT
pernissi.on to apply &� from your operation on
5.53 acres of my land (see attached map showing the
fields(s) to be used for the waste disposal). This
to P
ONE YEAR INTERVALS.
permission is granted for t �t�i�i�`f:2�C:of:( 1C�C: A S ,°q I,. t
I have not and will not give permission to anvone else tc
apply their poultry litter yr lagoon effluent to the
and tracts listed below.
Tract(s) Number
r 119
Field(s) Nu-2:ber
AP
The k�00;� Is. be applied in a manner that will not
o�:w
?..Z FP -
proble:7s with the nutrients in the litter leaching out o
the soil and into ground and surface water
and drainage ditches) .
tczLULNT �
The applicaticn of the iBLttt& will be time-4 in a-:annel: ~.
will not inconvenience the ex -sting farming oper :; ions.

1"=660'

WASTE MANAG=CEN'r P: H CERTIFICATION FOR IM OR, MX2
PZanae seta-� the Ca=saiated torte to the Division of Maviso=antal
t?-.o Addaesn as tho raverse side of this tors. n"= aC
- Naicne of; .,farm (Please print).; C. Jy
Address: 5.
Phana No.•2-93
Cdu4ty:
Farm location: Latitude .-and Loagitude:�'� �/ ��� (required) . Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map #ith locaticn'id Lined.
Type of operation .(swine, layer, dairy, etc.) : � ,1610 ,
Design Capacity (number of aninL&U)
} Average size of operation*(12 month population avg.): Z
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (&crag)e
' rrrraasarrraasrrrrrrrsrrrrrsrararrtrrrrrrr•++arrrrararrrarwrarairrarawraSrrraarararr '
Tao*.,stical SpoeiaZ+i,at CarCiZicatioa '
As a technical specialist :designated by the North Carolina Sail and Water
-Conservation Commission pursuant. to IsA NCAC 67. .oaos. I certify -that the.Liew or
expanded animial wasCa management'- system as installed for the farm nameq :aiaova
an animal waste management plan that meets the design. construction,
operation and maintenance standards -and'• specifications of the...,Division of
�=Enviror=ental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
_�-,;-:•;., ol moil and Water Conservation Commission pslrsuant t4 15A,NCAC 2K.0217 and
15A, NCAC F .0001.-A005. The following: elements and their Corresponding minimum
°criteria-hzvj-- oeer� verified by me at other ,designated technical specialists and
included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations' (buff erg).; liners or
`equivalent for la dons or waste storage capacity; adequate
-;;•.;,':��;._.. ,. g S Pam: waste storage
,.;;;:,:;.•quantity and amountofland for waste utilization (at use of third. party) ;, access
,:or.'ownership of "psopex. waste application.' equipment; schedule for :ti�,ng of
applications; appli"tion ratios; loading' rates t and the contrQl. of' the 'discharge'
ollu�ts �Erom. stozzwater runoff events less severe than' the 2S-year. 24-hour
�,.'�.•,'....,aE
:rL- ,Aa�ao"of„Teclh=ieal iyeeia3�.at (Pisase Pint) s ff�ltG4llQ �� �5�
_"�'liEiliatian " .
_' ti '�`Addxess (Agency) WA&sAw �l!- Phone NOIrk
-
' Signature : Ile.�-� Date
+i1s[ssaonaaaa=am==U=namrrrsasrramoo Mom+nmrraararn#rasarrsssr=a=#,rsastrraasr
. _ .: Cwtaet•/2iaaxtgar A�-seaa�tt " - _.
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established. in the:
mAProwd omiawl waste mmagglp" p1� for t4q, 9 i ed. Yq X�Wnt.
these prviceda�,rea.., I (Nip) )M9W t any adf&4 g4.. expgAp4oa tag the axist�Aq
desiga Capacity of %he w"te %IMVnt and s#p;+e, M stex� ons on of:°enew
ftCL Uies will V{WM47M A pew ggpUficatiort 40 �s i%%pad .Po tie vision of
MAVt"Mantal mgament befort. ;he new qpjs %re . 4%W *od. we) ;also
Midarstand that therq gpst IM ap Uscharge pR q#jjnaj waste AArvm 1* s -system to '
- ; „YY,• surface waters of state 9�4hpr through A man"Wde ccf%vgyaAoq or through
3: =Moff from a stp� event �p govere than the 25,E ear. 24.1Your aaarsn�: Th
_ aGPavved plan will bq Filed at. on far.. and at; the q 'ice of true local Sgil ash
'94ter Conaervati;on Matrict. -
same '04. Lap�Q . ��,ly ea a
Signature �. Date:, LE
owner (P;s*o A prigt)
Signature Date• XZ
XqtA= A .,age• zn d dw+�+Ierrhig requires r�pa� �Qa �! or a net{' ee ti figAM0V F
tip the aPGrOVet� plan Ja tha.�W) to t#R u#Ag1 Ca to the 03,visi.on of
gAvit'onmental Managexent wjtj%j$% 60 days of A 4;rgA#fer-
044 U5Z QKY 4CYZ—W#
W

f I
LM
LOU
1w
ift
LOU
•
"a
u
ULN
am
Im
F, Lm
LM
Lnl
LM
Lag
LCU
LLL2
IAU
im,
Im
ml
LM
i
lau
I
LUL
um
Lm
Ila
Lum LPE
mu
I'
am
Ll
LbLL
LM
o
1%6
ad
LL
G lid Lm L1P
[, •
+ ml
4 Lw
!a
1 LM6
A ff
LWA
L,L
AU.
LM
ry
Am
AM
ou
�,Gs
au
1-1
Log
tm
sw
Lin
1.4
us
LUMN
= ,
mv
no
Lux an
tm
um
LM
um,
s
un um
i
ov.-r.
uo 1.,
I= aff
0--W
"a um
LM im LLa
Up un,
4, Im -I-
Ulu LLM
tim
Mff
Lift

' I s1l
Town of
Kenansville
ANI
1301
:...::ri
:;_;;
Town of Kenansville
AREA NOT INCLUDED
ZON

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
7§ 00' n
727000"E 228 r29 57'30"
8 Raft
r/ 1301
210 r.a i3 golf '
379
/ �►
_ v, 1'
•: li • 10 �" \ em s° p . ; " �•r¢� .
;Cem y
/ 1aj/�it+Rs+`R N \ a
r p+ 1371
;.Cem
Tank
" ' 1� � .•.J' +i�js' p"' gel I 8M � y=—
22.9i {1
• y r.l a }—
1301
Jr
� I
+1
,613 j0 •�
IF
50 VIM
- N'��� th •,•• . • o ••.l Radio • 61 33.
• m Tower : `'
`35. a .r Jr H4t Seh: 3"•• �,.'���` • �• '/
•/ ' �I: nansville' •• ' r�: ,
♦ ` (8M 38.81
'� rnve
57' 30'
38.3 /
\ aao • •i
2072
t_ •War
titutd

5 fix': .. ll'. �'•�,{' •'�`. �`' �
r?t w i
' ^'�J• 1A .il �' ++'4• rr '�''ww AIL} e•.r• ..'.-�d"PR'"N r •�
_ �� ry� '' �Y'�'a• _ .. •fir.' a,\., �� - tR r
U• '� •t• ' a � •lei' '' `• �••-� '�.� +� \' -. '' 1 [ 5 � \\ r\. , �.
�q•i" .- , 'r.' 'DIY - si' ' yt�'
�'r rat: •?. 1�. -- _ .. - - -.. - .. _ - .: _ _ • `s°"� .,
u• r - f.--•r'�' mil' t ., j,:''7 fl'.� mil.., '� -, •^hrtt' ����rbn: �. f'�� - �4 .W'
1' s• �_iY� � �l i i '4 -• _� <-i•''� �* ! .: "/.'r•' _�; ��-•',j.' •fV r;'.�.�,a;A' ,,.- � � �i 7G
44,
sop
4,0
06
Jlc
+� T��'� m ,�s� `J1"�' 'n ? ,k '• _ v ?r t► ,�•• `err'
's 1+: \ F'•+ri. X _ .� ,� '_ a � /-�'-Y 5.}S r. Y r`��..,, � � � . r ' f ry r'S.'�,F 1 oMrl
`L\♦"^~ h. r�._ ,.5 -1 =L r tis} J :i4+i'�f I r.f ,�Aq ,q•'tie: a• s ��' 1.• irl i� ;ti,.
h s .'. � - 'R,,,-'a•1 .lam v' y �. �{ ' r'. 1 : i -•_
'Ali
;.; - 4w
AIF": A-,�
k4O
1� rf I Y i
.. •�J.. � y'i' Yt i � •�� { ,'ham � .
i�i- f?`I ��, met-:w�, - _ •.4
r � e��}�, i�' u � � `ems` � .,' �'•
.' Iis
: ! v 5' % _ i fry,• ''�' --,

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY (DWQ) [phone]
EMERGENCY MANAGEMNET SERVICES (EMS) [phone]
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SWCD) [phone]
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS) [phone]
COOPERATIVE EXTERSION SERVICE (CES) [phone]
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave you property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every
effort to ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible
location for all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should
take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may ore may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed belwo.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that cause the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed
to flowing leaks -possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch from the embankment to catch all
seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
1

2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage notes, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours call your DWQ regional office; Phone - -. After
hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility number, telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2
above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of
the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been
under taken, and the seriousness of the sitution.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phone number.
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Helath Department.
d. Contact CEs, phone number - , local SWCD office phone number - -, and local
NRCS office, for advice/technical assistance phone number - -.
4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's Department and explain you
problem to them and ask the person to contact the proper agencies for you.
b. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair or problem to minimize off -
site damage.
a.
b.
C.
Contractors Name:
Contractors Address:
Contractors Phone:
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting
Engineer, etc.)
a. Name:
b. Phone:
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste managment plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
IA

INSECT CONTROL CHECKLIST FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS
Source Cause BMP's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
(Liquid Systems)
Flush Gutters Accumulation of solids (1 Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated
soilds from gutters as designed.
() Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and Pits Crusted Solids () Maintain lagoons, settling basins and
pits where pest breeding is apparent to
minimize the crusting of solids to a depth
of no more than 6-8 inches over more than
30% of surface.
Excessive Vegetative Decaying vegetation O Maintain vegetative control along banks of
Growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
(Dry Systems)
Feeders Feed Spillage I 1 Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the accumulation
of decaying wastage.
I ) Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g. 7-10 day
interval during summer; 15-30 day interval during winter).
Feed Storage Accumulations of feed residues I ) Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
insuring drainage away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products).
( I Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed.
Animal Holding Areas Accumulations of animal wastes ( ) Eliminate low area that trap moisture along fences
and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
and disturbance by animals is minimal,
i) Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e. inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids as needed/.
AMIC--November 11, 1996

Dry Manure Handling Accumulations of animal wastes Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g. 7-10 day
Systems interval during summer, 15.30 days interval during
winter) where manure is loaded for land application
or disposal.
{ I Provide for adequate drainage around manure stockpiles.
{ I Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated wastes
in filter stripes around stockpiles and manure handling
areas as needed.
The issues checked ( ) pertain to this operation. The landowner/integrator agrees to use sound judgment in applying
insect control measures as practical.
I certify the aforementioned insect control Best Management Practices have been reviewed with me.
(Landowner Signature)
(Farm Name)
(Facility Number)
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
27695-7613.
AMIC--November 11, 1996

SWINE FARM WASTE MANAGEMENT ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST
Source Cause BMP's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead Swine production { } Vegetative or wooded buffers;
( ) Recommended best management
practices;
(} Good judgment and common sense
Animal body surfaces Dirty manure -covered animals (} Dry floors
Floor surfaces Wet manure -covered floors ( ) Slotted floors;
(► Waterers located over slotted floors;
(! Feeders at high and of solid floors;
{ I Scrape manure buildup from floors;
{ I Underfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits Urine ( ) Frequent manure removal by flush,pit
recharge,or scrape
Parital micorbial decomposition { I Underfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fans Volatile gases; f l Fan maintenance,
Dust { I Efficient air movement
Indoor surfaces Dust () Washdown between groups of animals
() Food additives;
(I Feeder covers;
(! Feed delivery downspout extenders to
feeder covers
Flush tanks Agitation of recycled lagoon (1 Flush tank covers
liquid whiles tanks are filling { I Extend fill lines to near bottom of
tanks with anti -siphon vents
Flush alleys Agitation during wastewater { } Underfloor flush with underfloor
conveyanance ventilation
Pit recharge points Agitation of recycled lagoon { 1 Extend rechard lines to near bottom of
liquid while pits are filling pits with anti -siphon vents
Lift stations Agitation during sump tank filling { I Sump tank covers
and drawdown
Outside drain collection Agitation during wastewater ( } Box covers
or junction boxes conveyance
End of drainpipes at lagoon Agitation during wastewater ( ) Extend discharge point of pipes ^
underneath lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces Volatile gas emissions [ I Proper lagoon liquid capacity
Biological mixing ( I Correct lagoon startup procedures
Agitation ( } Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
( I Minimum agitation when pumping
I I Mechanical aeration
{ I Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler nozzles High pressure agitation { I Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
Wind draft { } Minimum recommended operation pressure
(! Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
(} Pump from second -stage lagoon
AMOC--November 11, 1996

Storage tank or basin Partial microbial decomposition { I Bottom or midlevel loading
surface Mixing while filling { I Tank covers
Agitation when emptying (i Basin surface mate of solids
{ I Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface Partial micobial decomposition I I Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
Mixing while filling level
Agitation when emptying { ! Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge Agitation when spreading { I Soil injection of slurry/sludges
spreader outlets Volatile gas emissions ( ) Wash residual manure from spreader after use
( ) Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure, slurry Volatile gas emissions while drying (I Soil infection of slurry/sludges
or sludge on field surfaces i ! I Soil incorporation within 48 hours
(I Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
( ) Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals Carcass decomposition I I Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead animal disposal Carcass decomposition ( I Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits
pits ( I Proper location/construction of disposal pits
Incinerators Incomplete combustion I I Secondary stack burners
Standing water around Improper drainage (1 Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto public Poorly maintained access roads { I Farm access road maintenance
roods from farm access
Additional Information: Available From:
Swine Manure Management; 0200 Rule/BMP Packet NCSU-County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies, EBAE Fact Shear
NCSU-BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge --Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 128-88
NCSU-BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Fluse--Lagoon Treatment: EBAE 129-88
NCSU-BAE
Lagoon Desig and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
NCSU-BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU-BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33
NCSU-Swine Extension
Environmental Assuranc Program: NPPC Manual
NC Pork Produces Assoc
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force
NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Florida Cooperative Extension
The issues checked ( ) pertain to this operation. The landowner/integrator agrees to use sound judgment in applying
odor control measures as practical.
I certify the aforementioned odor control Best Managment Practices have been reviewed with me.
(Landowner Signature)
AMOC--November 11, 1996

IRRIGATION
DESIGN
CERTIFICATION
FOR
Marshall Phillips
August 16, 2000
I certify that this Plan has been prepared under my
direct supervision and meets the applicable regulations
of NRCS, DEM, dnd all other State and Local
Regulations to the best of my; 1j%wledge and belief.
0
Al =0 0 ^ rx j A A,M t.
License No. 1227

r �i rr rlr +✓r ■r "A how rr Nod rr um
LAGOON
HOUSES
t. r.
WOODS
10
WOODS tiJ
I
�Y
'eft
NOTES:
1) THRUST BLOCKING SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL BENDS, TEES, DEAD ENDS AND
OTHER SPECIAL FITTINGS WHICH REQUIRE RESTRAfNINO.
2) MAINLINE PIPE SHALL BE 6' AND 4' PVC PR 200 (SDR 21): LATERAL LINES SHALL
BE 2- PVC PR 160 (SDR 26) AND SHALL BE BURL ED TO HAVE AT LEAST 3 FEET OF
COVER.
3) THIS MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON THE ASCS MAP PROVIDED BY THE
OWNER AND WITH MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. IT IS CORRECT TO THE
BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.
4) WHERE POWERLFNES ARE IN THE SPRAY AREA, THE OWNER SHALL CONTACT THE
POWER COMPANY FOR CURRENT RESTRICTIONS AND APPROVAL
IRRIGATION DESIGN
for Marshall Phillips
SCALE: I" = 200'
T TT !t 771 Ik T T\
-- 6" PVC MAIN LINE
4" PVC MAIN LINE
2" PVC LATERAL LINE
N� BUFFER
—o— FULL CIRCLE SPRINKLERS
HALF CIRCLE SPRINKLERS
0 PUMP LOCATION
v VALVE LOCATION
7`
Prepared by: Bob Mitchell
Certified by: M. Floyd Adams, P.E.
Date: August 16, 2000 -

Date: 16-Aug-00
TABLE 4 - Irrigation System Specifications
Solid Set
Irrigation
Flow
Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
14
Max.
Operating Pressure at Pump (psi)
69
Design, Precipitation Rate (inlhr)
0.20
Hose
Length (fit)
NIA
Type
of Speed Compenstion
NIA
Pump
Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
Electric
Pump
Power (hp)
8
FL -
TABLE 5 - Thrust Block Specifications (1)
Designer may provide thrust block details on separate sheet.
LOCATION
THRUST BLOCK AREA (sq. ft.)
2" line
3" line
4" line
6" line
90 Degree Bend
0.65
1.39
2.30
4.92
Dead End f
0.46
0.98
1.60
3.48
Tee
0.46
0.98
1.60
3.48
45 Degree Bend
0.35
0.75
1.20
1 2.67
Ground Entry (2)
0.86
1.81
2.90
6.40
(1) Sae USDA -MRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430-DD.
(2) It is recommended that Ground Entry blocking be approximately 25% to 33% more than
that required for 90 degree elbows.

l• r r r r..rr r r //oars tlrtr ttomps WETM �..
Date: 16-Aug-00
TABLE 3 - Solid Set Irrigation Gun Settings
Fields (1)
and
Zone No. (2)
Number
of
Hydrants
WetteJd
Diamete
(feet)
Hydrant Spacing (ft)i
Flow
Rate (
..
Wetted
Acres
Comments
Half
Circles (3)
Noz2le
i le:
operating
• -
a
CggjN&1C0,4�j�&
Operating
Time
Arc
Pattern (3)
., •-�
�,
MW.rom
�
r�
------------
(1) See attadtied map provided by the Field Office for field OCation(s). 5.5. = Total Eff. Wetted
(2) Shaw separate entries for each pfpeline and/or with /hydrants in each field. Acres
(3) Hatt circle sprinkler locations must be equipped with shutoff valves and dosed at one-W the operating time.

r r r 11111® a>� i l� i i M�
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Date: 16-Aug-00
Land Owner/Operator Name: Marshall Philips County: Duplin
Address: 903 W. Wards Bridge Rd.
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone: 910 - 293 - 7805
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications (1)
Field
Number (2)
Approximate
Maximum
Usable Size
of Field (3)
(Acres)
Soil Type
Slope
(%)
Crop(s)
Maximum
Application
Rate (4)
(in I hr)
Maximum
Application
per Irrigation
Cycle (4)
(inches)
Comments
i - T3207
t 1.8
Autryville
0-6
Bermudagrass Hay/ Small Grain
0.60
1.0
2 - T1462
P 6.7
Autryville
0-6
Bermudagrass Hay/ Small Grain
0.60
1.0
r
1
(1) Table to be completed In Ile entirety by Field Office personnel and forwarded to the Irrigation system dealgner.
(2) See attached map provided by the Field Office for field locatlon(s).
(3) Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
(4) Refer to N.C. Irrigation Guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section 1 & G. Annual 9ppk200n must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used.

:.A
o.1

I
Al
mi 16,
4b 0

8L'E' D ANETLAND t nty.
W _1..>+vs:, 4 ..an..wrr h cv: art
ONSERVATfON=DETERMINATIQN�,} G ��
of i15DA AgeS. Farm No. and Tract No.
hcy�or`.'Pii;-o Requesting Determination �r
RPrInnu 1 _ ulrul v FannIRLE LAND
survey now available for making a highly erodible land determination? Yes No j]
FIELD NO.(s)
TOTAL ACRES
ire h• hly erodible soil map units on this farm? yes2s No
Ihly erodible fields that, according to ASCS records, were used to produce an agricultural commodity in any
ar during 1981-1985.
Ihly erodible fields that have been or will be converted for the production of agricultural commodities and,
ng to ASCS records, were not used for this purpose in any crop year during 1981.1985; and were not
i in a USDA set -aside or diversion program.
lighly Erodible Land determination was completed in the: Office Feld ❑
s-•;5 INK!,
J E ,G,F
�. � E 3E ak"�
RFrTInN ft - WETLAND
FIELD NO.(s)
TOTAL ACRES
sere h dric soils on this farm? Yes No ❑
�i
s`.
'_77� , .7
r3 s
Inds (W), including abandoned wetlands, or Farmed Wetlands (FW) or Farmed Wetlands Pasture (FWP).
Inds may be farmed under natural conditions. Farmed Wetlands and Farmed Wetlands Pasture may be
Id and maintained in the same manner as they were prior to December 23, 1985, as long as they are not
coned.
Converted Cropland (PC). Wetlands that were converted prior to December 23. 1985, The use, management,
Ige, and alteration of prior converted cropland (PC) are not subject to the wetland conservation provisions uriless
ea reverts to wetland as a result of abandonment.
.ial Wetlands (AW). Artificial wetlands Includes irrigation -induced wetlands. These wetlands are not subject
wetland conservation provisions.
nal Effect Wetlands (MM. These wetlands are to be farmed according to the minimal -effect agreement signed
time the minimal -effect determination was made.
ation Wetlands (MIW). Wetlands on which a person is actively mitigating a frequently cropped area or a wetland
med between December 23, 1985 and November 28, 1990.
oration with Violation (RVW-year). A restored wetland that was in violation as a result of conversion after
tuber 28, 1990, or the planting of an agricultural commodity or forage crop.
oration without Violation (RSW). A restored wetland converted between December 23, 1985 and
;tuber 28, 1990, on which an agricultural commodity has not been planted.
'
acement Wetlands (RPW). Wetlands which are converted for purposes other than to increase production,
s the wetland values are being replaced at a second site.
J Faith Wetlands (GFW+year). Wetlands on which ASCS has determined a violation to be in good faith and the
ind has been restored.
terted Wetlands (CW). Wetlands converted after December 23, 1985 and prior to November 28, 1990. In any
that an agricultural commodity is planted on these Converted Wetlands, you will be ineligible for USDA benefits.
ierted Wetland (CW+year). Wetlands converted after November 28, 1990. You will be ineligible for USDA
ram benefits until this wetland is restored.
versed Wetland Non -Agricultural use (CWNA). Wetlands that are converted for trees, fish production, shrubs,
)erries, vineyards or building and road construction.
verted Wetland Technical Error (CWTE). Wetlands that were converted as a result of incorrect determination
'SCS,
planned alteration measures on wetlands in fields are considered maintenance and are in compliance
FSA.
planned alteration measures on wetlands in fields are not considered to be maintenance and if
ilted will cause the area to became a Converted Wetland (CM. See item 22 for information an CW+year.
wetland determination was completed in the office ❑ field and was delivered ma!Qk to the person on
,arks. Ir
Sv>~ ,�,, -� s-- r�r.t-h►v-�@�,A "Refer to Attached Map For AreaS
Covered By Whis Determination
rift' that the above determination is correct and adequate for use in determining 30. Signature of SCS District Conservationist 31. Date
rility jar USDA program benefits, and that wetland hydrology, hydric soils, and
)Physic vegetation under normal circumstances exist on alt areas outlined as W) !'C"�
rnds �j - , vz(ff
armed Wetlands. and Farmed Wetlands Pasture. ���///
"and programs of tla Soil Canna radon Smwe iswnta W wftha had -regard to race, rlsllpr handueep.
M
SCS Copy

.•V.DuJLsa.
Kenansville, NC 28349
Service Telephone [phone]
lZebruary 16, 1996
lvlr. William Holland -'
06 Holland Road
Warsaw, NC 28398
Mr. Holland:
t:nclosed is your copy of a wetland determination for tract 1462 on which you indicated your
intent to clear some land. The attached map has been delineated to show the area(s) in
,luestion. Each area to be cleared has been identified with a symbol to denote its classification.
1,elow is an explanation of the various symbols that may pertain to your map. .
x NW- Non wetland - Area is non wetland and can be cleared and utilized without
violating Farm Bill.
x W - Wetland - Area is a wetland and should not be cleared for any reason if you
Dish to remain eligible for USDA programs, receive NRCS technical assistance, or avoid
violating US Army Corp of Engineers' and Division of Environmental Management
(DE112) regulations. Any exceptions to this statement should be in writing from the
Natural Resources Conservation Service prior to clearing land.
This determination is only for the area delineated on the attached map. If you plan to clear
more acreage than that shown on the map, you should request another wetland determination
for that area. In most cases the wetland area has been flagged on the ground and you should
follow the flags in trying to delineate your wetlands. ' The map is only an approximate
representation of what was flagged on the ground. You may wish to have the wetlands
surveyed for future reference and to avoid unintentional disturbance of the wetlands.
This determination has the concurrence of the US Army Corp of Engineers for purposes of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Prior Department of the Army permit authorization will
he required for any discharge of excavated or fill material into waters or wetlands on this
property. A permit is not required for work restricted entirely to high ground. For project -
Department of the Army permit requirements ,;on"ining your proposal, please contact
Mickey Sugg at 910-251-4811. Please use Action ID c9 o3 0 0 when referring to
permits associated with wetlands identified by this letter.
I have tried to make this determination as fairly as possible. However if you believe this
determination is incorrect, you have the right to appeal. To appeal send me a brief letter
explaining why you believe this determination is incorrect. Send the letter to the address on
tlic letterhead. This letter should be received within 15 days of your receipt of this letter.
r-r
Conservation Service,
` ""wrvation Service,
"nrrnt of Agriculture
Sincerely,
Michael E. Sugg
District Conservationist
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER

z/("Iq�
, Volume of 25 year - 24 hour -storm
Volume = 7.5 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 19745.6 cubic "feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A.
26023
cubic
feet
5B.
0
cubic
feet
5C.
18429
cubic
feet
5D.
19746
cubic
feet
TOTAL 64198 cubic feet
SUMMARY
Temporary storage period____________________>
180
days
Rainfall in excess of evaporation=====____=>
7.0
inches
25 year - 24 hour rainfall=====____________=>
7.5
inches
Freeboard=====_=_=____=___ =____ == _= _____>
1.0
feet
Side slopes==_______________________________>
3.0
: 1
Inside top length__________________====__-__>
229.6
feet
Inside top width=====_=_________ ________ __>
137.6
feet
Top of dike elevation_________________ _____>
45.5
feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation==== _-_______=___>
32.9
feet
Total required volume_________ _______=__-__>
170758
cu. ft.
Actual design volume=====___________________>
216299
cu. ft.
Seasonal high watertable elevation (SHWT)===>
38.2
feet
Stop pumping e1ev.__________________________>
41.7
feet
Must be > or = to the SHWT elev.==--__-_-_>
38.2
feet
Must be > or = to min. req. treatment el.=>
38.9
feet
Required minimum treatment volume=====_____=>
106560
cu. ft.
Volume at stop pumping elevation=====______=>
143188
cu. ft.
Start pumping elev._________________________>
43.7
feet
Must be at bottom of freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25 yr.- 24 hr. rainfall==>
196554
cu. ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation ==________>
1948.24
cu. ft.
Required volume to be pumped= =___= ___ =___>
44452
cu. ft.
Actual volume planned to be pumped=====_____>
51637
cu. ft.
Min. thickness of soil liner when required==>
1.8
feet
DESIGNED BY: 4- 4bso+l APPROVED BY:
DATE: z�qQ�- DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:
VdoM a 1d`I-i,� = 216, 2q q CA
i�du►�c O Clket 17Z, ZA�O c j T4-0' K .25 K 25 : Zi = 171 Cu.4-4j�c .
of 9.. = 4-30ckAblc
t1 y

F So.9+
48. 0 0
46.00
44.00
42.00
40.00
38.00
36.00
34.00
(122.70, 287. 03)
MARSHALL PHILLIPS: MARSHALL PHILIPS REV.
<359.33>
(489.87,258.26)
16 FEB 96 3:01 PM

1B FEB 96 3:01 PM
MARSHALL PHILLIPS: MARSHALL PHILIPS REV.% Balanced

i 1
1 1 er 00 t in el rc
Iterating to balancing within 10.0 cubic yards...
delta
Fill
CUT - FILL
0.00
16og2.07
6092.04
0.03
0.00
4985.35
7280.11
-2294.76
0.00
4985.37
7280.09
-2294.72
-0.50
6003.47
6178.35
-174.88
-0.54
6091.44
6092.65
-1.21
-0.54
6092.07
6092.04
0.02
Lower "Proposed" by 0.54 feet.
New surface called "Balanced" has been created.
Project: MARSHALL PHILLIPS
Drawing: MARSHALL PHILIPS REV.
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
owner:
Estimator: �• -}}ammoµ
Prepared by: using Sitework
FLcs� : 'T�ts Va�o+lE -DO" rce;r S 4c'LLr' a
�ccAJA;rYDr4 m- (z DRA(KA66)
�� ��RJAl10NLST

Swine Confinement
Building
Flnished Floor Elev.
Top Pad Elev. 45.¢
S" Pipe
Invert Elev. 43.9
TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION
Single Stage Lagoon - Pit Recharge Design
1D]PLln4 County, NC
M ARSHAU- nt N to tP'5
Total Design Storage Elev. 44.4.G
Invert Outlet Pipe Elev. 4-3.71
Stop Pump Elev. 4-I.-71
Bottom Elev. �.� 1
.07
YL . = m . 2.0
Support post
Natural Ground
FT. - DESIGN MIN. CLAY LINER THICKNESS
areas of unsuitable material encountered during construction
of lagoon slopes and bottom will be excavated below grade (for
the minimum clay liner thickness), backfilled (with approved soil
material) & compacted (to clay liner construction specifications
in design).....see soils investigation
lo.o f .
Settled Top Dam Elev
Add 5% Settleme
Constructed Top E
4.5.49�-
:1>
R. Horton, MRCS (Z'95)

-f� o
'1
co
-moo 6
— --o DiVsroa 1
D G
Z m Io
�41
r�
�a
,\r
�
r
r
e o A
n a
PSI
RoAn
-o

SHEET 1 OF 2
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
----------------------------------------------------------
FOUNDATION PREPARATION:—
-----------------------
The foundation area of the lagoon embankment and building pad shall be
cleared of trees, logs, stumps, roots, brush, boulders,sod and rubbish.
Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The topsoil from
the lagoon and pad area should be stripped and stockpiled for use on
the dike and pad areas. After stripping, the foundation area of the
lagoon embankment and building pad shall be thoroughly loosened prior
to placing the first lift of fill material to get a good bond.
EXCAVATION AND EARTHFILL PLACEMENT:
-----------------------------------
The completed excavation and earthfill shall conform to the lines,
grades, and elevations shown on the plans. Earthfill material shall
be free of material such as sod, roots, frozen soil, stones over
6 inches in diameter, and other objectionable material. To the extent
they are suitable, excavated materials can be used as fill. The fill
shall be brought up in approximately horizontal layers not to exceed 9
inches in thickness when loose and prior to compaction. Each layer
will be compacted by complete coverage with the hauling and spreading
equipment or standard tamping roller or other equivalent method.
Compaction will be considered adequate when fill material is observed
to consolidate to the point that settlement is not readily detectible.
NOTE THE SPECIAL.REQUIREMENTS FOR PLACEMENT OF LINERS IN THE LINER
SECTION OF THIS SPECIFICATION. The embankment of the lagoon shall be
installed using the more impervious materials from the required
excavations. Construction of fill heights shall include 5 percent for
settlement. Dikes over 15 feet in height and with an impoundment
capacity of 10 acre-feet or more fall under the jurisdiction of the NC
Dam Safety Law. The height is defined as the difference in elevation
from the constructed height to the downstream toe of the dike.
Precautions shall be taken during construction to prevent excessive
erosion and sedimentation.
LINER:
THE MINIMUM REQUIRED THICKNESS SHALL BE 1.6 ft.
-------------------------------------------------
NOTE: LINERS (PARTIAL OR FULL) ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE ATTACHED SOILS
INVESTIGATION REPORT SO INDICATES OR WHEN UNSUITABLE MATERIAL IS
ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. A TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF THE LINER
IS INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN WHEN LINERS ARE REQUIRED BY THE SOILS REPORT.
When areas of unsuitable material are encountered, they will be over -
excavated below finish grade to the specified depth as measured
perpendicular to the finish grade. The foundation shall be backfilled
as specified to grade with a SCS approved material (ie - CL,SC,CH).
REFER TO THE SOILS INVESTIGATION INFORMATION IN THE PLANS FOR SPECIAL
CONSIDERATIONS.

SHEET 1 OF 2
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
------------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) and
180 days of temporary storage. The time required for the planned
fluid level (permanent and temporary storage) to be reached may vary
due to site conditions, weather, flushing operations, and the amount
of fresh water added to the system.
The designed temporary storage consists of 180 days storage for:
(1) waste from animals and (2) excess rainfall after evaporation. Also
included is storage for the 25 year - 24 hour storm for the location.
The volume of waste generated from a given number of animals will be
fairly constant throughout the year and from year to year, but excess
rainfall will vary from year to year. The 25 year rainfall will not
be a factor to consider in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage
volume must always be available.
A maximum elevation is determined.in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). If the outlet pipe is not installed at the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent marker must be installed at this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain lagoon treatment depth.
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.
3. Begin temporary storage pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level
reaches the elevation 43.7 as marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -
out when the fluid level reaches elevation 41.7 . This temporary
storage, less 25 yr- 24 hr storm, contains�4244? cubic feet or
317521 gallons. 4-54 5 J;s.
4-Z44J it3 Zs ire re""4
Yatume I'm be puM.ped
/�'FA

U. S. Department of Agriculture NC-ENG-34
Soil Conservation Service firm September 1980
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
Landowner_&fmm-u. PIALLLt 3 County DlixiN
Community or Group No. Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam__LL_Ft. Length of Flood Pool Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigations Qrq 6 _ —
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
.Ist. Elev. :Est. Elevation
Kind of :Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length: Width: Slope: Land Use Improvements Above :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain: Flood Plain
Ft. Ft. Ft. F#.
: waadoa Nd 4% N4A--
1 500 Sa• . . t 1 T..: .
2 .
3 .
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach A tlinnFN FA ri tjR£ z- STR,uTUPF-wtt s �,, n1 ;:N 1'ANGPR -
LIFE OR DAMAGE PUBLIC TRANSPORTAION.
Hazard Classification of Dam Q b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
L04pe"
Gem Classification
-J>+►M Cam" `x.
B
{ I , I I , III, I V , V ) ,� �g'� _ d Rr4ce _ ! l4 , [�4 OLA - g
y �7�00AC�Cll�%=�IZObk Datename
Concurred By _
name tit e
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date

,D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.5 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 17600.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A.
26023
cubic
feet
5B.
0
cubic
feet
5C.
16427
cubic
feet
5D.
17600
cubic
feet
TOTAL 60049 cubic feet
SUMMARY
Temporary storage period====================>
180
days
Rainfall in excess of evaporation===========>
7.0
inches
25 year - 24 hour rainfall==================>
7.5
inches
Freeboard=====================_ ============>
1.0
feet
Side slopes===== ===========================>
3.0
1
Inside top length===========================>
220.0
feet
Inside top width===== -------- _______________>
128.0
feet
Top of dike elevation=======================>
45.5
feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation==================>
34.5
feet
Total required volume=== ===================>
166609
cu. ft.
Actual design volume========================>
172280
cu. ft.
Seasonal high watertable elevation (SHWT)===>
38.2
feet
Stop pumping elev.==-=-----------_-__-=_-_-_>
41.7
feet
Must be > or = to the SHWT elev.=--=---===>
38.2
feet
Must be > or = to min. req. treatment el.=>
40.5
feet
Required minimum treatment volume===========>
106560
cu. ft.
Volume at stop pumping elevation============>
107856
cu. ft.
Start pumping elev.=--_______________________>
43.7
feet
Must be at bottom of freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25 yr.- 24 hr. rainfall==>
154680
cu. ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation-
153261
cu. ft.
Required volume to be pumped================>
42449
cu. ft.
Actual volume planned to be pumped==========>
45405
cu. ft.
Min. thickness of soil liner when required==>
1.6
feet
DESIGNED BY : �� _. APPROVED BY: A
DATE: 41(1 DATE: 3/5/96
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:

• f
TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width
220.0 128.0 28160.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
0.0 square feet Describe this area.
TOTAL DA 28160.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
Volume of waste produced
Feces & urine production in gal./day per 135 lb. ALW 1.37
Volume = 106560 lbs. ALW/135 lbs. ALW * 1.37 gal/day 180 days
Volume = 194650 gals. or 26022.7 cubic feet
i$. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallons
per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
ic. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 16426.7 cubic feet

LAGOON DESIGN
)erator:MARSHALL PHILLIPS County: DUPLIN Date: 02/16/96
stance to nearest residence (other than owner): 2800.0 feet
AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT (ALW)
0
sows (farrow to finish)
x
1417
lbs. --
0
lbs
0
sows (farrow to feeder)
x
522
lbs. -
0
lbs
0
head (finishing only)
x
135
lbs.. -
0
lbs
0
sows (farrow to wean)
x
433
lbs. =
0
lbs
3552
head (wean to feeder)
x
30
lbs. -
106560
lbs
Describe other :
0
Total
Average Live WeIgHE--
106560
lbs
MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME
OF
LAGOON
Volume = 106560 lbs. ALW x
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW
=
1 CF/lb. ALW
Volume = 106560 cubic feet
STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0. 0 cubic feet Nam' Pm- 0%gA$ S V-04urrr
TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
Inside top length (feet)--------------------- 220.0
Inside top width (feet)---------------------- 128.0
Top of dike elevation (feet)----------------- 45.5
Bottom of lagoon elevation (feet)------------ 34.5
Freeboard (feet)----------------------------- 1.0
Side slopes (inside lagoon)------------------ 3.0 : 1
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 214.0 122.0 10.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
214.0 122.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
154.0 62.0
26108 (AREA OF TOP)
9548 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
184.0 92.0 67712 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. _ AAREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOMO * DEPTH/6
26108.0 67712.0 9548.0 1.7
Total Designed Volume Available = 172280 CU. FT.

TYPES OF MATERIAL ENCOUNTERED IN BORINGS
(Use one of systems below)
UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION
GW -Well graded gravels; gravel, sand mix
GP - Poorly graded gravels
GM -Silty gravels; gravel -sand -silt mix
GC -Clayey gravels; gravel -sand -clay mix_
SW -Well graded sands; sand -gravel mix
SP -Poorly graded sands
Shl - Silty sand
SC -Clayey sands, sand -clay mixtures
ML - Silts; silty, v, fine sands; sandy orclayey silt
CL-Clays of low to medium plasticity
CH -Inorganic clays of high plasticity
MH -Elastic silts
OL-Organic silts and silty clays, low plasticity
OH -Organic clays, medium to high plasticity
USDA CLASSIFICATION
g - gravel
s - sand
vfs.-veryfine sand
sl - sandy loam
fsI -fine sandy loam
I -ioam
gl - gravelly loam
Si - silt
sil -silt loam
cI-clay loam
sicl-silty clay loam
scl -sandy clay loam
sic -silty clay
c -clay
I. Suitable material for embanirment is available 0 Yea [:] No (Adkn1. u+here /.led on th• sketch on
nnxrse afde)
REMARKS:
nI) r�,l I
2. Explain hazards requiring special attention in design (Seepage, sFrinp,.rock etG)
I
i
' 4
GENERAL REMARKS:
24
25
26
27
ZS
23
30
31113211331134
13511361
37
11 Z$
39
1 40 11
41
42
1 43
144 11
45
146
1 47 11
48
49
150
151

SCS-ENG•578 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
R". 5-70 SOM CONSERVATION SERVICE
i,
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED PnNn cirr
� 3 •'�� i5uvT1 �
51, WATERSHED AREA MF-AiirREMENTS
CROPLAND -ACRES
WOODLAND -ACRES TOTAL -ACRES
SKETCH OF PROPOSED POND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS WERE MA1)E (Approx. scale I" feet)
■
■
■■■■■■■■■■RNME
EN15■■■■
■■
■■■■■■■■
■■®■■■■■■■■■■i
■■
■■■MEMO©
■■■MENN■■■■■■
■
■■■■■
■■■
■■■■H■■■■■■■■■
EMS
E-ENN■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
•
:ORING NUM13ER AND PROFILE
X�nfinued on back uphere noeauarV) Show water table elevadons ondam-sile bori"vs.
®®i■■1■:■E■IN■'■�■I■i■i■i■i■i■i■BROWN
®�!■
■I■';■■■
®■■
■f
■lam'■�■!■
■I■■f
■�',`■i�l�
®��IIll1l"!��"■i■I®■',■I■1■i■■I■j■I■I■I■I■■f■I■
!�!®MINE
■I■i■I■1■
�■I■!■I■!■I■I■�■'�I■1■I■I■i■I■I■I■`■i■i■1■I
�i�i■�
��■!
■
■i■I■l
BORINGS
.J+ S �i u.,- - 3 �. p -
rF fp .76

NC-CPA-17
REV. 1, 2-96
Page 2
OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
IS ENDANGERED AND/OR THREATENED SPECIES HABITAT PRESENT?
YES
NO
IS A DESIGNATED NATURAL SCENIC AREA INCLUDED IN THE PLANNING AREA OR
WILL PLANNED ACTIONS IMPACT ON AN ADJACENT NATURAL SCENIC AREA?
YES `
NO
rS AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR HISTORICAL SITE LOCATED IN THE PLANNED AREA?
YES
NO
ARE THERE PRIME, UNIQUE, STATE OR LOCALLY IMPORTANT FARMLANDS IN THE
YES
NO
OPERATING UNIT?
WILL THE ACTION RESULT IN SODBUSTING?
YES `
NO
If the answer to any of the above is yes, NRCS will not provide technical
assistance unless agency oli is followed.
WASTE MANAGEMENT
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY LAND APPLY ALL WASTE YES NO
INCLUDING SLUDGE, ALTHOUGH SLUDGE MAY ONLY BE APPLIED INFREQUENTLY?
IF NO, DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE LAND? YES NO
IF LAND IS NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER, CAN PRODUCER GET AGREEMENT ON LAND YES NO
ON WHICH TO APPLY WASTE?
(Attach Waste Utilization Plan to site evaluation.) fS"'.cvv W -ll u.se air laNj ;ar sprQ7
Set% Waskw plum umJ ajAcRa6rhA
SOIL INVESTIGATION - VALID ONLY IF SOIL INVESTIGATION
SHEET ATTACHED
IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR LAGOON?
YES
NO
IS A LINER REQUIRED?
YES
NO
TYPE OF LINER TO BE USED:
CLAY
BENTONITE SYNTHETIC
IF CLAY LINER IS TO BE USED, IS SUITABLE CLAY AVAILABLE ON
YES
NO
SITE?
IF CLAY IS NOT AVAILABLE ON SITE, DOES LANDOWNER HAVE
YES
NO
ACCESS TO CLAY?
IS A CORE TRENCH REQUIRED?
YES
NO
(Attach soil investigation sheet to site evaluation.)
IS SUBSURFACE DRAIN TILE PRESENT?
YES
NO ./
(If yes, tile must be removed or plugged)
SITE APPROVED YES NO CONDITIONAL
COMMENTS
THIS SITE INVESTIGATION IS VALID FORTWELVE MONTHS FROM THE DATE SHOWN BELOW. IF CONSTRUCTION
HAS NOT BEEN STARTED WITHIN TWELVE MONTHS, A NEW SITE INVESTIGATION WILL BE REQUIRED. >!
SIGNATURE DATE �6
1/ Changes in the local or state law or changes in the standard could require a new site investigation.

United States
Natural
Department of
Resources
Agriculture
Conservation
Service
WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY SITE EVALUATION
NC-CPA-17
REV. 1, 2-96
GENERAL INFORMATION
NAME 1; LOCATION
tUja WftW A1C Z __A
TELEPHONE 916 - 7_93 - 3 804 SIZE OPERATION 355E - ulftu. {e, , rder
LOCATION DATA
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER -Z,0,00 FT.
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST PUBLIC FACILITY (school. church, etc.) 7_ ateFT.
IS SITE WITHIN 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? YES _ NO
If yes, MRCS cannot provide assistance.
IS SITE AT LEAST 100 FT. FROM A "BLUE LINE" PERENNIAL STREAM? YES NO
If no, site must be relocated.
IS SITE WITHIN 1 MILE ZONING JURISDICTION OF A MUNICIPALITY? YES NO
If yes, landowner should consult with local zoning board about required
permits. Permits must be obtained prior to design approval. `
�{@tictnsv�liP &ei "l Q)1e 6*q QwAdy3j-
ARE UTILITIES IN CONSTRUCTION AREA? YES NO
If yes, see Part 503 of the National Engineering Manual and follow policy.
(Copies of maps or other reference materials may be attached to site
WILL SITE INVOLVE CLEARING WOODLAND OR ANY NON -CROPLAND? YES / NO
If yes, producer must complete Form NRCS-CPA-38 (Request for Certified
Wetland Determination/Delineation).
WILL ACTION RESULT IN SWAMPBUSTING? YES NO ✓
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PRODUCER TO CONTACT THE US ARMY CORP OF
ENGINEERS AND THE DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TO DETERMINE IF PERMITS ARE REQUIRED.
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, THE PRODUCER SHOULD NOT CLEAR ANY LAND UNTIL A WETLAND DELINEATION
IS MADE.
MRCS will provide technical assistance in wetlands only under the following conditions. For natural wetland
inclusions less than one acre in size, MRCS will provide assistance only if the functions and values lost are fully
mitigated. For natural wetlands greater than one acre in size, MRCS will provide assistance only after a
rigorous sequencing process to include avoidance, minimization of impacts, and compensatory mitigation is
carried out in that order of preference.
ODOR CONTROL
HAS ODOR CONTROL BEEN DISCUSSED WITH PRODUCER:
• PREDOMINANT WIND DIRECTION? YES NO
• PRECHARGING LAGOON WITH FRESH WATER TO AT LEAST It2 YES _Z NO
OF THE CAPACITY?
• USING GOOD SOUND JUDGMENT IN LAND ,APPLICATION YES ✓ NO _
OF WASTE?

J
IMPOR.TANT INFORMATION
ABOUT LAGOON CONSTRUCTION
LISTED BELOW IS A BRIEF SUMMARY OF VOLUMES AND OTHER
DATA:(SEE CONTENTS OF PLAN FOR MORE INFORMATION)
EXCAVATION
FILL (pad & dike)
TOP SOIL (minimum 3" thick)
CLAY LINER (represents a complete liner)
6092--- cubic yards
6092--- cubic yards
171--- cubic yards
1630--- cubic yards
Constructed top of dam must include a minimum of 5% settlement -
EXAMPLE: 10 feet high dam will require 5% of 10 feet or 0.5 feet
fill above planned top of dam.
Clay content, thickness and compaction of liners (if required) are
very important. If the certifying technical specialist is unable
to approve the liner with normal field techniques, an independent
engineering analysis will be required (see CONSTRUCTION
SPECIFICATIONS for additional information). If an independent
engineering analysis is required, this expense will be the
responsibility of the owner/grower.
Special attention needs to be given to the seeding specifications.
The lagoon dike must be seeded according to specifications before
the system can be certified and stocked with animals. (Consult
with your NRCS Conservationist regarding mulching)

Qy ! IJ
SWINE FARM
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION; OPERATION,
AND MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR
Marshall Phillips
May 2, 1996
I certify that this Plan has been prepared under my direct
supervision and meets the applicable regulations of
NRCS, DEM, and all other State and Local Regulations
to the best of my kpoWk aV belief.
ri CA �n 'd.
M. Floyd AdaWT19. 7441.7 zDate
License No. 12j73
r ;�j! ���•• 17
7
,aa

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE PLAN
Proper lagoon liquid management should be a year-round priority. It is especially
important to manage levels so that you do not have problems during extended rainy and
wet periods.
Maximum storage capacity should be available in the lagoon for periods when the
receiving crop is dormant (such as wintertime for bermudagrass) or when there are
extended rainy spells such as the thunderstorm season in the summertime. This means
that at the first signs of plant growth in the later winter/early spring, irrigation according to
a farm waste management plan should be done whenever the land is dry enough to
receive lagoon liquid. This will make storage space available in the lagoon for future wet
periods. In the late summer/early fall the lagoon should be pumped down to the low
marker (see Figure 2-1) to allow for winter storage. Every effort should be made to
maintain the lagoon close to the minimum liquid level as long as the weather and waste
utilization plan will allow it.
Waiting until the lagoon has reached its maximum storage capacity before starting to
irrigate does not leave room for storing excess water during extended wet periods.
Overflow from the lagoon for any reason except a 25-year, 24-hour storm is a violation of
state law and subject to penalty action.
The routine maintenance of a lagoon involves the following:
Maintenance of a vegetative cover for the dam.
Fescue or common bermudagrass are the most common vegetative
covers. The vegetation should be fertilized each year, if needed, to
maintain a vigorous stand. The amount of fertilizer applied should be
based on a soils test, but in the event that it is not practical to obtain
a soils test each year, the lagoon embankment and surrounding areas
should be fertilized with 800 pounds per acre of 10-10-10, or
equivalent.
Brush and trees on the embankment must be controlled. This may be
done by mowing, spraying, grazing, chopping, or a combination of
these practices. This should be done at least once a year and
possibly twice in years that weather conditions are favorable for
heavy vegetative growth.
NOTE: If vegetation is controlled by spraying, the herbicide must not be allowed to enter
the lagoon water. Such chemicals could harm the bacteria in the lagoon that are treating
the waste.
Maintenance inspections of the entire lagoon should be made during the initial filling of
the lagoon and at least monthly and after major rainfall and storm events. Items to be
checked should include, as a minimum, the following:
Waste Inlet Pipes, Recycling Pipes, and Overflow Pipes ---look for:
I . separation of joints
2. cracks or breaks
3. accumulation of salts or minerals
4. overall condition of pipes

Lagoon surface ---look for:
1. undesirable vegetative growth
2. 'floating or lodged debris
Embankment ---look for:
1, settlement, cracking, or "jug" holes
2. side slope stability ---slumps or bulges
3. wet or damp areas on the back slope
4. erosion due to lack of vegetation or as a result of wave action
S. rodent damage
Larger lagoons may be subject to liner damage due to wave action caused by strong
winds. These waves can erode the lagoon sidewalls, thereby weakening the lagoon dam.
A good stand of vegetation will reduce the potential damage caused by wave action. If
wave action causes serious damage to a lagoon sidewall, baffles in the lagoon may be
used to reduce the wave impacts.
Any of these features could lead to erosion and weakening of the dam. If your lagoon has
any of these features, you should call an appropriate expert familiar with design and
construction of waste lagoons. You may need to provide a temporary fix if there is a threat
of a waste discharge. However, a permanent solution should be reviewed by the
technical expert. Any digging into a lagoon dam with heavy equipment is a serious
undertaking with potentially serious consequences and should not be conducted unless
recommended by an appropriate technical expert.
Transfer Pumps ---check for proper operation of:
1. recycling pumps
2. irrigation pumps
Check for leaks, loose fittings, and overall pump operation. An unusually loud or grinding
noise, or a large amount of, vibration, may indicate that the pump is in need or repair or
replacement.
NOTE: Pumping systems should be inspected and operated frequently enough so that you
are not completely "surprised" by equipment failure. You should perform your pumping
system maintenance at a time when your lagoon is at its low level. This will allow some
safety time should major repairs be required. Having a nearly full lagoon is not the time
to think about switching, repairing , or borrowing pumps. Probably, if your lagoon is full,
your neighbor's lagoon is full also. You should consider maintaining an inventory of spare
parts or pumps.
Surface water diversion features are designed to carry all surface
drainage waters (such as rainfall runoff, roof drainage, gutter outlets,
and parking lot runoff) away from your lagoon and other waste
treatment or storage structures. The only water that should be
coming from your lagoon is that which comes from your flushing
(washing) system pipes and the rainfall that hits the lagoon directly.
You should inspect your diversion system for the following:
1. adequate vegetation
2. diversion capacity
3. ridge berm height

Identified problems should be corrected promptly. It is advisable to inspect your system
during or immediately following a heavy rain. If technical assistance is needed to
determine proper solutions, consult with appropriate experts.
You should record the level of the lagoon just prior to when rain is predicted, and then
record the level again 4 to 6 hours after the rain (assumes there is no pumping). This will
give you an idea of how much your lagoon level will rise with a certain rainfall amount
(you must also be recording your rainfall for this t6 work). Knowing this should help in
planning irrigation applications and storage. If your lagoon rises excessively, you may
have an inflow problem from a surface water diversion or there may be seepage into the
lagoon from the surrounding land.
Lagoon Operation
Startup:
1. Immediately after construction establish a complete sod cover on bare soil
surfaces to avoid erosion.
2. Fill new lagoon design treatment volume at least half full of water before
waste loading begins, taking care not to erode lining or bank slopes.
3. Drainpipes into the lagoon should have a flexible pipe extender on the
end of the pipe to discharge near the bottom of the lagoon during initial
filling or another means of slowing the incoming water to avoid erosion of
the lining.
4. When possible, begin loading new lagoons in the spring to maximize
bacterial establishment (due to warmer weather).
5. It is recommended that a new lagoon be seeded with sludge from a healthy
working swine lagoon in the amount of 0.25 percent of the full lagoon
liquid volume. This seeding should occour at least two weeks prior to the
addition of wastewater.
6. Maintain a periodic check on the lagoon liquid pH. If the pH falls below
7.0, add agricultural lime at the rate of 1 pound per 1000 cubic feet of -
lagoon liquid volume until the pH rises above 7.0. Optimum lagoon liquid
pH is between 7.5 and 8.0.
7. A dark color, lack of bubbling, and excessive odor signals inadequate
biological activity. Consultation with a technical specialist is recommended
if these conditions occur for prolonged periods, especially during the warm
season.
Loading:
The more frequently and regularly that wastewater is added to a lagoon, the better the
lagoon will function. Flush systems that wash waste into the lagoon several times daily are
optimum for treatment. Pit recharge systems, in which one or more buildings are drained
and recharged each day, also work well.

Management:
Practice water conservation ---minimize building water usage and
spillage from leaking waterers, broken pipes and washdown through
proper maintenance and water conservation.
Minimize feed wastage and spillage by keeping feeders adjusted. This
will reduce the amount of solids entering the lagoon
Maintain lagoon liquid level between the permanent storage level and
the full temporary storage level.
Place visible markers or stakes on the lagoon bank to show the
minimum liquid level and the maximum liquid lever (Figure 2-1).
Start irrigating at the earliest possible date in the spring based on
nutrient requirements and soil moisture so that temporary storage
will be maximized for the summer thunderstorm season. Similarly,
irrigate in the late summer/early fall to provide maximum lagoon
storage for the winter.
The lagoon liquid level should never be closer than 1 foot to the lowest
point of the dam or embankment.
Do not pump the lagoon liquid level lower that the permanent storage
level unless you are removing sludge.
Locate float pump intakes approximately 18 inches underneath the liquid
surface and as far away from the drainpipe inlets as possible.
Prevent additions of bedding materials, long-stemmed forage or vegetation,
molded feed, plastic syringes, or other foreign materials into the lagoon.
Frequently remove solids from catch basins at end of confinement houses or
wherever they are installed.
Maintain strict vegetation, rodent, and varmint control near lagoon edges.
Do not allow trees or large bushes to grow on lagoon dam or embankment.
Remove sludge from the lagoon either when the sludge storage capacity is
full or before it fills 50 percent of the permanent storage volume.
If animal production is to be terminated, the owner is responsible for
obtaining and implementing a closure plan to eliminate the possibility of a
pollutant discharge.
Sludge Removal:
Rate of lagoon sludge buildup can be reduced by:

proper lagoon sizing,
mechanical solids separation of flushed waste,
gravity settling of flushed waste solids in an appropriately designed basin, or
minimizing feed wastage and spillage.
Lagoon sludge that is removed annually rather than stored long term will:
have more nutrients,
have more odor, and
require more land to properly use the nutrients.
Removal techniques:
Hire a custom applicator.
Mix the sludge and lagoon liquid with a chopper -agitator impeller
pump through large -bore sprinkler irrigation system onto nearby cropland;
and soil incorporate.
Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland or
forageland; mix remaining sludge; pump into liquid sludge applicator; haul
and spread onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.
Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland or
forageland; dredge sludge from lagoon with dragline or sludge barge; berm
an area beside lagoon to receive the sludge so that liquids can drain back
into lagoon; allow sludge to dewater; haul and spread with manure spreader
onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.
Regardless of the method, you must have the sludge material analyzed for waste
constituents just as you would your lagoon water. The sludge will contain different
nutrient and metal values from the liquid. The application of the sludge to fields will be
limited by these nutrients as well as any previous waste applications to that field and crop
requirement. Waste application rates will be discussed in detail in Chapter 3.
When removing sludge, you must also pay attention to the liner to prevent damage. Close
attention by the pumper or drag -line operator will ensure that the lagoon liner remains
intact. If you see soil material or the synthetic liner material being disturbed, you should
stop the activity immediately and not resume until you are sure that the sludge can be
removed without liner injury. If the liner is damaged it must be repaired as soon as
possible.
Sludge removed from the lagoon has a much higher phosphorus and heavy metal content
than liquid. Because of this it should probably be applied to land with low phosphorus
and metal levels, as indicated by a soil test, and incorporated to reduce the chance of
erosion. Note that if the sludge is applied to fields with very high soil -test phosphores, it
should be applied only at rates equal to the crop removal of phosphorus. As with other
wastes, always have your lagoon sludge analyzed for its nutrient value.
The application of sludge will increase the amount of odor -at the waste application site.
Extra precaution should be used to observe the wind direction and other conditions which
could increase the concern of neighbors.

_.� . d;j
. Boa •�� f . .. ,, '2'S.�'•�^at
Possible Causes of Lagoon Failure
Lagoon failures result in the unplanned discharge of wastewater from the structure.' Types
of failures include leakage through the bottom or sides, overtopping, and breach of the
dam. Assuming proper design and construction, the owner has the responsibility for
ensuring structure safety. Items which may lead to lagoon failures include:
Modification of the lagoon structure ---an example is the placement of a pipe
in the dam without proper design and construction. (Consult an'expert in
lagoon design before placing any pipes in dams.)
Lagoon liquid levels ---high levels are a safety risk.
Failure to inspect and maintain the dam.
Excess surface water flowing into the lagoon.
Liner integrity ---protect from inlet pipe scouring, damage during sludge
removal, or rupture from lowering lagoon liquid level below groundwater
table.
NOTE: If lagoon water is allowed to overtop the dam, the moving water will soon cause
gullies to form in the dam. Once this damage starts, it can quickly cause a large discharge
of wastewater and possible dam failure.

System Calibration
Information presented in manufacturer's charts are based on average operation
conditions with relatively new equipment. Discharge rates and application rates
change over time as equipment gets older and components wear. In particular,
pump wear tends to reduce operating pressure and flow. With continued use,
nozzle wear results in an increase in the nozzle opening which will increase the
discharge rate while decreasing the wetted diameter.
You should be aware that operating the system differently than assumed in the
design will alter the application rate, diameter of coverage, and subsequently the
application uniformity. For example, operating the system with excessive pressure
results in smaller droplets, greater potential for drift, and accelerates wear of the
sprinkler nozzle. Clogging of nozzles can result in pressure increase. Plugged
intakes or crystallization of mainlines will reduce operating pressure. Operating
below design pressure greatly reduces the coverage diameter and application
uniformity.
For the above reason, you should calibrate your equipment on a regular basis to
ensure proper application rates and uniformity. Calibration at least once every
three years is recommended. Calibration involves collecting and measuring flow at
several locations in the application area. Any number of containers can be used to
collect flow and determine the application rate. Rain gauges work best because
they already have a graduated scale from which to read the application amount
without having to perform additional calculations. However, pans, plastic buckets,
jars, or anything with a uniform opening and cross-section can be used provided
the liquid collected can be easily transferred to a scaled container for measuring.
For stationary sprinklers, collection containers should be located randomly
throughout the application area at several distances from sprinklers. For traveling
guns, sprinklers should be located along a transect perpendicular to the direction
of pull. Set out collection containers 25 feet apart along the transect on both
sides of the gun cart. You should compute the average application rate for all
nonuniformity of the application. On a windless day, variation between containers
of more than 30 percent is cause for concern. You should contact your irrigation
dealer or technical specialist for assistance.
'Reprinted for Certification Training for Operations of Animal Waste Management Systems Manual

NATURIAL RESOURCES
SERVIC)",
s o C o n-..-t I �;*t Cl pleasa RE.-pty

FPD.
FPO� kO. : 91229S212'2, 71
ui' i,\".nrth Carolina
Environr-nierlt
J
(mi, moi
Yet AcUng Secretary
januiu y 12, 2GO 1
4�
MAY
. . . . . . . . . . . .
A ILA?
4,
it
AAW Vion 0
PandRIg LK has camlowd 0 pwhniiTtor).
).e.c -a we car inui, reviev.., P'11-_­:.J�n, hi_d'ai n conr.inuc
M WIF suslind coMwes We axwom of Qvgen 17"0wed W v4 jv%A &-ann A Ana Ow.
WIN one, n tin -year cNp iodon. Your NOW shodd be Wmj n W N Wyn4,i jr-i nal U.,
We nincunt of Nuolun pruducod Or a mvIna pnwj mQ-wr WQ n!
f-i --ion Year Or... and Yanr Two of It
Wifl) _aril and on W do 9CAMIS 00b :01 AN.'
to dam Won Oc Why WInOly 0gan qvrau no
t.1kaJ-:i'J WIN revIlons inust be signed and dated by bt;Jaii:nc- wvi
'Jli: ALNew jannir apphcahcin munhar sken PIKE, 1412 ;v4.nvW4 -01010 on W- 100.0my;
f
tiLi-,vnit,{.d ill duplkaie to my atmnHan at W adAva
n" nr m Fahmn, I K JWI N do D&NO wOl pawn yovWykn 4v4vpLv h:
_00 rK j 'Xt
Of LtKi �UbjCLt 3-MM a: spmrn in Tyl n Ent 1 n h N 1 no 0
M1 0 143-2111 and uk nd"wi YOU 7001 W"namen: ...:MY; of T40 01.NI:7 wn
_1 v.,­ uc�. ': o:; --,a rdilig 6. please 1,,.rd !, wv', j4 I.-
I.- -
Sol SARF'O
Paz; Ft.
W 17 MIP Santa fAW ?WWQ, NcWh GaOma 2MRS-1517
` 1'. E I SWj
nil AM=sWe Won EmNopr

FRUI
110.
WASTE TJTI—'-lLAT!,�)!-1
il-
must be n?Tqm.,e.-L c�,n ---hi?
n:7 ni:;- ay, c.2 s n 0,"!
2-5 ye��r 2-1
th- 5-i7c-2n -,- of ti,.-.
of the -or�Ddu� --7
11, T, C e 11 1 ZE+ Z ii
7. R.v
7-1—.; C7.
-,:- LJ
71
M'
P E CTI 7�7'�ILY T I E
-ROPS TIMIES VCR R(Ilw
ez ;LCRFS
IT/AC
411bs WAC
3. Clb�l IT/AC
ck
1 0 -

'z 312 63� 715 VA
US Postal service
Receipt for Certified Mail i
No Insurance Coverage Provided.
Do not use for Intemational Mail See reverse
Sent to I
QA
Street S r t
3
t
Post otNce, State, a ZIP Coda L l C 3
J'
Postage
$ •
Certified Fee
Spedal Delhvery Fee
Restricted D!Inl!
us
$'
Retum Retaipf'Stionvinp to
1,10
Whom' Qete. v'ered�
I
�q
Retule b
(J�le- Addfess
OC'
pC
DCt!
TOTR PostaQ
$
Poslm
0
a