250050_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS,
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 25DO50 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250050
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region:
Date of Visit: 04/21/2017 Entry Time: 1 D:00 am Exit Time: 11:00 am Incident #
Farm Name: Little Squealers Nursery Owner Email:
Owner: Matthew Thomas Jones Phone:
❑ Denied Access
Washington
[e-mail]
252-531-2550
Mailing Address: 3055 Ormondsville Rd Ayden NC 28513
Physical Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd Griffon NC 28530
Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator. Maxwell Foods LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 27 34" Longitude: 77' 17' 34"
From Griffon travel Hwy 118 to Craven county line. After crossing county line, turn left on N C S R 1459 and follow to stop sign. Turn
right and back left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and sign on right approx.. 1.5 miles.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator:
Matthew Thomas Jones
Operator Certification Number: 1002842
Secondary ❑IC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name
Brent Mitchell
Phone:
On -site representative
Brent Mitchell
Phone:
Primary Inspector:
Megan H Stilley
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis 1-6-17 1.68
8-25-16 1.75) 21)need to get new sample, make sure wrin 60 days of irrigation
Sludge Survey 7-3-16 Thick-3.2'
LTZ-3.8'
Pump intake-5.5'
Calibration due 2017
Crop yield complete
Soil Test due 2017
"Can you record freeboard & rainfall on same form
`New owner
page: 1

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility : Matthew Thomas Jane: Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 04/21/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine Wean to Feeder 3,200 2,281
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,E
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY o8126195 19,50 25,00
page: 2

Permit AWS250050 Owner - Facility : Matthew Thomas Jone- Facility Number. 250050
Inspection Date: 04/21/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d, floes discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treabnent
Yes No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
■ ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks}
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page 3

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility : Matthew Thomas Jone! Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 04121/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
N ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
1S. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
E ❑
❑
Records and Documents
yer,
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
D
E ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
[]
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
X E]
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page 4

s
Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility : Matthew Thomas Jone: Facility Number.
250050
Inspection Date: 04/21/17 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Ha Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
SIDE-1
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
110
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
U ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ 0
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑0
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
0
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon I Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

0
0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250050 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AVVS250050
[l Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit: Routine County:
Craven Region:
Washington
Date of visit: 05/24/2016 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 10:00 am Incident #
Farm Name: Creekside Farms
Owner Email:
creeksidenursery@gmai
Owner: Chad Schneider
Phone:
252-524-0807
Mailing Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd
Grifton NC 285309063
Physical Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd
Grifton NC 28530
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Maxwell Foods LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35' 22' 34" Longitude:
77° 17' 34"
From Grifton travel Hwy 118 to Craven county line. After crossing county iine, turn left on N C S R 1459 and follow to stop sign.
Turn
right and back left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and sign on right approx.. 1.5 miles.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified operator: Melvin C Schneider Operator Certification Number: 22072
Secondary OIC(s);
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Chad Schneider Rhone
Primary Inspector- Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date;
Secondary Inspector(s)
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility : Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection date' 05/24/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Analysis 2-8-16 1.39
9-1-15 .95
3-3-15 1.44
Sail Test due 2017
Sludge Survey 10-21-15 Thick-3.1'
I-Tz-4 ff
Pump intake-5.8') 35% Sludge Ratio
Calibration complete 10-21-15
'No current waste analysis for June 2015 irrigation
-Field 1 (1.5 acres) 6-19-15 applied 24.36 lbs.
-Field 2 (1.5 acres) 6-22-15 applied 24.36lbs.
-Field 3 (1.5 acres) 6-23-15 applied 24.36lbs.
`Facility non -compliant for lagoon starting 2-4-16 at 17 inches
21)'1agoon level dropped wl no irrigation - level 28" on 10-18-15 and then 36" on 10-22-15 w/ no irrigation.
21)'3 inches rainfall on 5-8-15 - lagoon level 31" on 5-6-15 and 30" on 5-10-15 wl no irrigation. 2 inches not adding up.
21)'only one cutting of Bermuda in 2015 in October ) did you mow or forget to add yields?7?
7)Maintain lagoon bank - large vegetation
21)Need to make sure to record inspection initials & weather codes on ERR-2
page: 2

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility : Chad Schneider Facility Number 250050
Inspection Date: 05/24/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 3.200 2,568
Total Design Capacity: 3.200
Total SSLW: 96.000
Waste Structures
Disignated observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 08/26/95 19,50 19_50
page: 3

Permit' AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 05/24/16 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
250050
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. aid discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
0
00
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large
❑
■ ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
T. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
0
❑ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
MEI
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste APRlication
Yes
No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page 4

Permit: AWS250050 Owner -Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number:
Inspection Date. 05/24/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
250050
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Gram Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soii Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
E ❑
❑
16. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
EEI
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19, Did the facility fait to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
N ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21, Does record keeping need improvement?
E❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
■
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page:
5

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number:
250050
Inspection Date 05/24/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
0
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ M
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? It yes, check the
❑
■ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
[]
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ M
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, aver -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
M ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 6

• ■ Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
250050 Facility Status:
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
03/17/2015 Entry Time: 09:10 am
Farm Name:
Creekside Farms
Owner:
Chad Schneider
Mailing Address:
1770 Honolulu Rd
Active Permit: AWS250050 Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Craven Region: Washington
Exit Time: 10:10 am Incident #
Owner Email: creeksidenurse y(pgmai
Phone: [phone]
Grifton NC 285309063
Physical Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd Grifton NC 28530
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods LLC
Location of Farm; Latitude: 35' 22' 34" Longitude: 77' 17' 34"
From Grifton travel Hwy 118 to Craven county line. After crossing county line, turn left on NCSR 1459 and follow to stop sign. Turn
right and back left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and Sign on right approx.. 1.5 miles.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Melvin C. Schneider Operator Certification Number 22072
Secondary OIC[s]:
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone
On -site representative Chad Schneider Phone
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector{sy:
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS250050 Owner -Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection date: 03/17/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Soil Test 4-29-14 wl highest lime 0 tons
Cu & Zn values elevated but wlin range
Waste Analysis 4-15-14 2.11
7-22-14 1.16
10-22-14 .94
3-3-15 1.44
'Out a couple days on current waste analysis for 12-27-14 irrigation
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
Crop yield complete
15)Small grain did not come up - poor stand
-most of PAN used (4.15 Ibs left) on small grain
Sludge Survey 10-13-14 Thick-3.0'
LTZ-4,1,
Pump intake4H) 34% Sludge Survey
24)Catibration not in records - will get me a copy by the end of the week - complete 12-2-13
page: 2

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility : Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 03/17/15 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 2,567
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 08126195 19,50 24,00
page: 3

Permit: AWS250050 Owner- Facility . Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 03/17/15 Inpsection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large
❑
� ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑0
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS250050 Owner -Facility : Chad Schneider Facility Number:
Inspection pate: 03/17/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
250050
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crap Type 6
Sail Type 1
Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
M ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
E]
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP7
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
[]
page:
5

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility : Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 03/17/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yas
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
E
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
E ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment [PLAT] certification?
❑
❑ 0
❑
Qtherlssues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
H ❑
❑
page: 6

i ■
Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250050 Facility Status:
Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Date of Visit: 08/21/2014 Entry Time: 09:00 am
Farm Name: Creekside Farms
Active permit: AWS250050 ❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Craven Region: Washington
Exit Time: 10:00 am Incident p
Owner Email: ereeksidenursery®gmai
Owner: Chad Schneider
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd
Grifton NC 285309063
Physical Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd
Grifton NC 28530
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Maxwell Foods LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35' 22' 34" Longitude: 77' 17' 34"
From Grifton Irave I Hwy 118 to Craven county line. After crossing county line, turn left on NCSR 1459 and follow to stop sign. Turn
right and back left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and sign on right approx.. 1.5 miles.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Melvin C Schneider Operator Certification Number: 22072
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representativets}: Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone,
On -site representative Chad Schneider Phone:
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Megan H Stilley
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility : Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 08/21114 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Sludge Survey 12-20-13 Thick-2.7'
LTZ-4.7'
Pump intake-4.9' } 28% Sludge Ratio
Crop yield complete
Waste Analysis
3-22-13 1.76
6-24-13
1.33
12-5-13
1.61
4-15-14
2.11
7-22-14
1.16
Soil Test 4-29-14 w1 highest lime 0 tons
-elevated zinc levels but Win range
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
*Make sure to have waste an*sis Win 60 days of irrigation
21]last calibration in records is 2010 - need to get me calibration ASAP (calibration emailed to me)
'Repairs made to back side of lagoon. Need to get vegetation established
page: 2

Permit AWS250050 Owner - Facility : Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
• Inspection Date: 08/21/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 2.837
Total Design Capacity:
Total S5LW:
Waste Structures
❑isignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 013/26/95 19.5Q
page: 3

Permit. AWS250050
Owner - Facility : Chad Schneider Facility Number 250050
Inspection Date: 08/21/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? [if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & treatment
Yes
No Na, N¢
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le) large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250050
Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 08/21/14 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMPy?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
[]
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
[a
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
0
E] ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility : Chad Schneider Facility Number 250050
Inspection Date. 08/21/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
11
120 Minute inspections?
[]
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
11
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
w ❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
N ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structures] and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
[]
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
■
❑
Other Issues
Kos
No Na No
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑ ■
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fait to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑ ■
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑ ■
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑ ■
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
[l
❑ 0❑
page 6

r
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 250050 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS250050
❑ Denied Access
Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County:
Craven Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 09/09/2013 Entry Time: 09:30 am Exit Time: 10:30 am incident #
Farm Name: Creekside Farms
Owner Email:
creeksidenursery@gmai
Owner: Chad Schneider
Phone:
252-524-0807
Mailing Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd
Grifton NC 285309063
Physical Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd
Grifton NC 28530
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant M Not Compliant Integrator:
Maxwell Foods LLC
Location of Fans: Latitude:
35' 22' 34" Longitude:
77' 17' 34"
From Grifton travel Hwy 118 to Craven county line. After crossing county line, turn left on INC SR 1459 and follow to stop sign.
Turn
right and back left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and sign on right approx.. 1,5 miles.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts M Waste Col, Star, & Treat
M Waste Application
Records and Documents M Other Issues
Certified Operator: Melvin C Schneider
Operator Certification Number:
22072
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(sy: Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Chad Schneider
Phone
On -site representative Chad Schneider
Phone
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stiiley
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector{s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis 6-24-13 1.33
3-22-13 1.76
6-21-12 1.23
Last Soil Test 2011 next one due 2014
Crop yield complete - Bermuda stand great
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
Sludge Survey 2012 Thick-3.2'
LTZ-4. T
Pump intake-5.4') 35% Sludge Ratio
'Mow lagoon bank'
page: 1

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility : Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 09/09/13 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 2,631
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 08126195 19.50
page: 2

" Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility : Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 09/09/13 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
res
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
■ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
rss
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
L1
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Me
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS250050 Owner -Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number:
Inspection pate: 09/09/13 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
250050
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Soil type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
M ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
M ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
ME]
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stacking?
❑
page:
4

• Permit: AWS250050 Owner- Facility : Chad Schneider Facility Number:
250050
Inspection Date: 09109/13 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and documents
yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ 0
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
N
❑ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ 0
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31, Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
[]
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
11
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
E ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 2NO50 Facility Status: Active _ Permit: AWS250050 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Gomoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/09/2013 Entry Time: 09:30 AM Exit Time: 1 Q;30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Creekside Farms „ _ Owner Email: rt@ Ksidenursery0am
re-l"TM-WLYTE - i . �.�'��'-�d+IY+r�
Mailing Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd Grit= NC 285309053
Physical Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd_ __ Grifton NC 28530
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°22'34" ^_,,, Longitude: 77°17'34"
From Grifton travel Hwy 118 to Craven county line. After crossing county line, turn left on NCSR 1459 and follow to stop sign. Turn
right and back left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and sign on right approx.. 1.5 miles.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
0 Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
jj Other issues
Certified Operator: Melvin C Schneider Operator Certification Number: 22072
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representatives): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Chad Schneider Phone:
On -site representative Chad Schneider Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: —
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis 6-24-13 1,33
3-22-13 1.78
6-21-12 1,23
Last Soil Test 2011 next one due 2014
Crop yield complete - Bermuda stand great
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
Sludge Survey 2012 Thick-3.2'
LTZ-4.1'
Pump intake-5.4' } 35% Sludge Ratio
'Mow lagoon bank"
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider
Inspection Date: 0910912013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Facility Number: 250050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 2,631
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
kgoon PRIMARY 08/28/95 19,50 24.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250050 Owner • Facility: Chad Schneider
Inspection Date: 09/09/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? ('if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Facility Number: 250050
Reason for Visit: Routine
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ Cl ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Cl ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.1 large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
Cl
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider
Inspection Date: 09109/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 10%/10 lbs.?
Q
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
[Hay]
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
Cl
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
1 S- Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
Q
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number; 250050
Inspection Date: 0910912013 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? in
Maps? Q
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall I inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
[1
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Nan -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon Q
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit. AWS250050 Owner • Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number : 250050
Inspection Date: 09/09/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous foss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
rtaa. _.. �......_.. v__ u_ MA uF
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? 0 ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ D
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

i
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250050 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS25OQ50 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ „ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 05J 5l2012 Entry Time. 04:30 AM _ Exit Time: 10:30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Greekside Farms Owner Email: creeksldenurseryUcirn
Mailing Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd rift n
Physical Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd Qrif on NO28530
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°22'34" Longitude: 7Z'17'34"
From Grifton travel Hwy 118 to Craven county line. After crossing county line, turn left on NCSR 1459 and follow to stop sign. Turn
right and back left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and sign on right approx.. 1.5 miles.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator. Melvin C Schneider
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 22072
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone:
On -site representative Chad Schneider Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250050 owner • Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection hate: 05/15/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis 4-2-12 1.5
12-15-11 1.4
8-1-11 .91
'Records in good shape - much improved?
Soil Test 4-27-1 1 wl highest lime 1.3 tons ) need lime
Cu & Zn values whn range
Sludge Survey 12-21-11 Thick-3.6'
LTZ-3.6'
Pump intake-5.0') 41 % Sludge Ratio
Crop yield complete
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
Calibration due 2012
'Get lagoon level down before Fall - irrigate at agronomic rates when conditions permit
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number : 250050
Inspection Date: 05/15/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3,162 Ll
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
lagoon PRIMARY 08/26/95 19.50 24.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 05/15/2412 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? ('if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
B. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
$. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider
Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 05/15/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/101bs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250050 Owner • Facility: Chad Schneider
Inspection Date: 05115M12 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need 'Improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number: 250050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ IN ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure{s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS250050 Owner • facility: Chad Schneider
Facility Number : 250050
Inspection Date: 05115/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
2$. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑
❑
❑
■
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e.,
discharge, ❑
■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility?
❑
In
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

xj'A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
December 5, 2011
Chad Schneider
Creekside Nursery
1770 Honolulu Rd.
Grifton, NC 28530
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS250050
zl
Creekside Nursery
Animal Waste Management System
Craven County
Dear Chad Scl-mcider
The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge sun�ey information on December
2, 2011. With the survey results, you requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement
for the lagoon at Creekside Nursery facility. Due to the amount of treatment volume available.
the Division cannot grant an extension for the sludge surrey.
The next sludge survey at this facility should be performed before December 31, 2011. Thank
you for your attention to this matter. Please call me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Larry W. Wade PE
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Washington Reg onal Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Permit File AWS250050
1635 Mail Sevice Gen:er, Ra!eia n- her:r caroi,na 27699-1-"H
_onabcn: 2729 GaD-al 51vc., Rale@�, Norh Carolina 27E0/
?no;le: 918-7•?3-32' 1 FAX: [phone]E 1 C ,stornar Service- 1-877-623-074E.
In?eme:: eY:r:.r;:.�,a:arqualir;r.c,rn
D
_-- 5 2 TI `
?No?thearonf
�I&Tally
..'tG'J �- �..:�:':�:ilrt'ti i�••ini3i;VE :�;C1iC._ ..,

z
s
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250050 Facility Status: Active _ Permit: AWQQ2,50050 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine„ County: Craven __ Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/16/2011 Entry Time:11 00 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Crgekside Fars[I§__. _ Owner Email: creeksidenurseryOo rn
Owner: Chad 5chngjdgr Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1777Q Honolulu Rd
Physical Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd _ Grifton NO 28530
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°22'34 Longitude: 77°17'34"
From Grifton travel Hwy 118 to Craven county line. After crossing county line, turn left on NCSR 1459 and follow to stop sign. Turn
right and back left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and sign on right approx.. 1.5 miles.
Question Areas:
W Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment © Waste Application
im Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Melvin C Schneider Operator Certification Number: 22072
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative{sy: Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone:
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number : 250050
Inspection Date: 08116/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
'Get lagoon level down for Fall
`Great Bermuda stand
Calibration due 2012
Sludge Survey 12-22-10 Thick-3.2'
LTZ-3.7'
Pump intake-5.0') Sludge Ratio 38%
Very few records provided during inspection. Facility needs to mail me 2011 Soil Test, 2010/2011 Freeboard and Rainfall, 2011
Irrigation, 2011 Crop Yield, 2011 Waste Analysis, 2011 Sludge Survey, and updated Stocking records. Please send me records wlin
10 days of inspection. 943 Washington Square Ma11, Washington, NC 27889.
`Facility followed up by sending DWQ required records for review
Rainfall and Freeboard complete and correspond with irrigation
"No current waste analysis for May 2011 irrigation
Crop yield updated
Waste Analysis 2-25-11 1.8
8-1-11 .91
Soil Test 4-27-1 1 wl highest lime 1.3 tons } need lime
Cu and Zn values within range
Page: 2

Permit: AVVS250050 Owner • Facility: Chad Schneider
Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 0811612011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Q swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3,250
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
11971on -71 PRIMARY 08/26/95 19.50 32.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number : 250050
Inspection Date: 0811612011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VlsIt: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyanoe man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? {if yes, notify DWQ}
Q
■
Q
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? {if yes, notify DWQ}
❑
■
❑
Cl
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
Q
■
❑
n
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
Q
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
I!
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed {I.e.l large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.}?
5. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
n
■
❑
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Cl
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
Q
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals [Cu, Zn, etc]? ❑
Page. 4

Permit: AWS250050 Owner • Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number. 250050
Inspection Data: 08116/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN n 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Qverseed
Crap Type 3
Crap Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crap and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
VVU P?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 08116/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VlsIt: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
■
Weekly Freeboard?
■
Waste Analysis?
■
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
■
Crop yields?
■
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
Cl
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■
❑
❑
box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
Page: 6

0
Permit: AWS250050 Owner- Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 08/1612011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
❑
❑
■
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n
El
Page 7

r
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 25QO50— Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS2500% _ 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: QravenRegion: Washington
Date of Visit: 12/07/2010 Entry Time: 10 00 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Creekside Farms
Owner: Chad Schneider
Incident #:
Owner Email: creeksidenurservQgm
Phone: [phone]
• • � r - • G77iiITil►leY�rb�ir�IrI��
Physical Address: 1770 Honolulu did _ _ Grifton NC 28530
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°22'34" Longitude: 77°17'34"
From Gdfton travel Hwy 118 to Craven county line. After crossing county line, turn left on NCSR 1458 and follow to stop sign. Turn
right and back left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and sign on right approx.. 1.5 miles.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Melvin C Schneider
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 22072
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone:
On -site representative Chad Schneider Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider
Facility Number; 250050
Inspection Date: 12/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
New COC and Permit in records
Waste Analysis 10-18-10 .50
8-5-10 .89
5-5-10 1.9
Going to use 50 lb overseed
Soil Test taken 2010 - get in records
Complete calibration due 2010
Complete sludge survey 2010
Sludge Survey 10-26-09 Thick-2.2'
LTZ-5.1'
Pump intake-5.7' } 22% Sludge Ratio
`Bermuda window extended till October 1 Bth
Crop yield complete - 5 cuttings
Freeboard and Rainfall complete and correspond with irrigation
Small grain planted, but not coming up in most areas - may need to re -plant if irrigation occurs
*Lagoon inudated at beginning of October 2010
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 12107/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3,186
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 08/26/95 19.50 25.00
-J. -, - 1
Page 3

• Permit: AWS250050 Owner- Facility: Chad Schneider Facility #lumber: 250050
Inspection Date: 12/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
f 1
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
5. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Nat applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Ap lip cation
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Pages 4

Permit: AWS25DO50 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider
Facility Number, 250050
Inspection Date: 1210712010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste A lication
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 10%11 ❑ lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
�!
■
❑
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
Cl
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page:5

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Faclllty: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 12/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Vlsk: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? Cl ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
124 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
0
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page. 6

' Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider
Inspection Date: 12107/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
X At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑
❑
❑
■
Quality representative immediately.
31. aid the facility fail to notify regional €]WQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■
n
❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■
❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■
❑
it
Page: 7

n
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 2 Facility Status: Active Permit: MU5W 0 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance in oection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Cra gn — Region: Vashington
Date of Visit: 12103/2009 _ Entry Time:09:00, AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Creeksidg Farms_ Owner Email: creeksidenurseunam
Owner: Cbgd Schneider Phone: - 7
Mailing Address, 177Q Honetutu fed Griffon NC 2§55309N3 _
Physical Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd , __ Gdfton NC 28530
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods In
Location of Farm: Latitude: �522'34" , Longitude: 77'17'34"
From Grifton travel Hwy 118 to Craven county line. After crossing county Line, turn left on NCSR 1459 and fallow to stop sign. Turn
right and back left on NCSR 1458, Farm path and sign on right approx.. 1.5 miles.
[question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Melvin C Schneider
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other issues
Operator Certification Number: 22072
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone:
On -site representative Chad Schneider Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s)-
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider
Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 12103/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
New COC and Permit in records
Waste Analysis 8-10-09 1.0
5-29-09 3.3
2-19-09 1.8
Sludge Survey 10-26-09 Thick-2.2'
LTZ-5.1'
Pump intake-5.7') 22% Sludge Ratio
Crop yield complete
`Calibration due 2010
Sludge Analysis 5-29-09 20.7 j not within 60 days of sludge removal
Soil test 4-7-09 with highest lime .9 tons
Cu and Zn values within range
Sludge Removal March 2009 on Corn
21 }Sludge Analysis 9-11-08 7.4 }not within 60 days of removal
Check on soil test for sludge removal (Timmy Cox) 6082 Tract
Rainfall and Freeboard complete and correspond with sludge removal and irrigation
Need to plant small grain and begin irrigation
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 12103/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
0 Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3,020
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
F190on PRIMARY OW6195 i 9.50 193,00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 12/03/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e1 large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
5. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
D■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit. AWS260050 Owner - Faclllty: Chad Schneider
Inspection Date: 12/03/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Cl
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
Cl
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda
Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
1B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page:5

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider
Facility Number. 250050
Inspection Date: 12/03/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
■
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? 00011
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30 At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS250050 Owner- Facility: Chad Schneider
Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 1210312009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■
❑
Cl
32. Did Rev iewe rl I n s pector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
■
❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■
❑
❑
Page: 7

I
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250050 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250050 ✓ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive.or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Crav n Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/12/2008 Entry Time:Q8:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Creekside Farms Owner Email:
Owner: Qhad Schnvider Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd Grifton NC 285309063 _
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Goldsboro Hog Farms Inc _
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°22'34 Longitude: 77°17'34"
From Grifton travel Hwy 118 to Craven county line. After crossing county line, turn left on NCSR 1459 and follow to stop sign. Turn
right and back left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and sign on right approx.. 1.5 miles.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Melvin C Schneider Operator Certification Number: 22072
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Chad Schneider Phone:
On -site representative Chad Schneider Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number. 250050
Inspection Date: 08/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
COC and Permit 2009 in records
Waste Analysis 7-8-08 1.5
4-2-08 2.2
Sludge Survey 12-19-07 Thick-4.36'
LTZ-2.99' } No POA submitted. Need to submit ASAP
Soil test 4-17-08 with highest lime 0 tons } No 2007 soil test
Cu and Zn values within range
'Freeboard 24" on 2-13-08 and 24" on 2-20-08 with 1.75" + 1.5" of rain on 2-14-08 and 2-18-08 and no irrigation events to account for
no level change with rainfall.
`Calibration 2008 taken, but not back yet
'Sprayfelds in better shape
'Going to begin pumping lagoon down
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250050
Inspection Date: 0811212DOS
Regulated Operations
Owner • Facility: Chad Schneider
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Design Capacity
Facility Number : 250050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3,018
Total design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon PRIMARY 0&28195 19.50 21.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 256050
Inspection Date: 08112/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impact Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
Q
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.I large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (blot applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
MOO
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number. 250050
Inspection Date: 08/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? n
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16- Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate perthe irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
Cl
❑
18, is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19, bid the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider
Inspection Date: 08/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number: 250050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
n
Q
❑
n
■❑❑❑
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
■
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
■
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
Q
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
�..
❑
V—
❑
u..
■
uA
❑
uc
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those Q ■ Q 0
mortality rates that exceed ncrmai rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ n ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit. AWS25DO50 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number : 250050
Inspection Data: 0&12/2D08 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewe rllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page 7

t
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250050 __ Facility Status: Active Permit: AM250050 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comolranoe Ins2gotioll Inactive or Closed pate:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven _ Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08112/2008 Entry Time:0&O0 AM Exit Time: Incident M
Farm Name: CreelkSide Far= Owner Email:
Owner: Chad Schneider _ Phone: 252-524-OB07
Mailing Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd Grifton NC, 285309053
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Goldsboro Hog Farms In
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35122'34" Longitude: 77°17'34"
From Gnfton travel Hwy 118 to Craven county line. After crossing county line, turn left on NCSR 1459 and fallow to stop sign. Turn
right and back left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and sign on right approx.. 1.5 miles.
Question Areas:
Discharges B Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Melvin C Schneider Operator Certification Number: 22072
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Chad Schneider Phone:
On -Site representative Chad Schneider Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS25W50 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 25ODSO
Inspection Date: 0811=008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
COC and Permit 2009 in records
Waste Analysis 7-8-08 1.5
4-2-08 2.2
Sludge Survey 12-19-07 Thick-4.38'
LTZ-2.99' ) No POA submitted. Need to submit ASAP
Soil test 4-17-08 with highest lime D tans } NO 2007 Soil test
Cu and Za values within range
'Freeboard 24" on 2.13-08 and 24" on 2-20-08 vAth 1.75" + 1.5" of rain on 2-14.08 and 2-18-08 and no irrigation events to account for
no level change with rainfall.
'Calibration 2008 taken, but not hack yet
'Sprayfields in better shape
`Going to begin pumping lagoon down
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number; 250050
Inspection Date: OB112I2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3,018
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon PRIMARY 08r28195 19.50 21.00
Page. 3

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Numher : 25D050
Inspection Date: 08/52/2908 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at.
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DM)
❑ i ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage Capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I e.I large trees. severe
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
5. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Nat applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑ Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? fl
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page. 4

n
Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility- Chad Schneider
Inspection Date: 08/1212008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 2 500 50
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
[Hay. Pasture]
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type S
Soil Type 1
Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
1B. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ 0 ❑
17. Dees the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ I_l
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ IF,
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Page: 5

0
Permit: AWS250050 Owner - facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number : 250050
Inspection Date: 0811212008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
■
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after a 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
■
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ n ❑
23. It selected. did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ n ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the Facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) cartification?
❑ ❑ ■ 1-1
Other Issues
Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andfor document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality ooncern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page. 6

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number : 250050
Inspection Date: 0811212008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherissues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site represenWve? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a fellow -up visit by same agency?
Page. 7

Lj Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency rr-��
Facility Number: 250050 Facility Status: Active �Permit: AWS250050 I II Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Craven Region:Wa-shinglon
Date of Visit: 04/1012008 Entry Time :11:00 AM Exit Time: 1200 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Creekside Farms
Owner: Chad Schneider
Owner Email:
Phone:-524-9807
Mailing Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd Grlfton NC 205309D53
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Goldsboro Hog Farms In
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°22'34" Longitude: 77 17_34"
From Grafton travel Hwy 118 to Craven county line. After crossing county line, turn left on NCSR 1459 and follow to stop sign. Turn
right and hack left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and sign on right approx.- 1.5 miles.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment iN Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Melvin C Schneider Operator Certification Number: 22072
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour Contact name Chad Schneider Phone:
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone:
P ri m a ry I ns pect on Marlin Mdawhorn Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 25DO50
Inspection Date; 0411012009 Inspection Type; Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
'Need to lower lagoon level as soil and weather conditions permit
'(21)Missing soil test for 2007. Remember to take sail test for 2008.
'Need to complete PAN balance IRR2 (9123107 & 91301D7)
"Need to calibrate irrigation 2008
(25)Sludge survey not available for review (Survey 2007)
"Lagoon level recorded weekly. Rainfall recorded daily
'According to rainfall records. Freeboard level 19.0 with 1.56' rainfall records. Freeboard level 17.5"
'Reviewed stocking records and crap yields
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 04110f2008 Inspection Type: Operalions Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3. 558
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start pate Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 08/26195 18.50 21.50
Page. 3

Permit: AlNS25M50 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number : 250050
Inspection Date: 041101200E Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ?� ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? [if yes, notify DVVQ]
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑ Q
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed {I.e1 large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.}?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
Cl ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ [I Cl
dry stacks and/or wet stacks]
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ [1 ❑
Improvement?
Waste Ap lip cation
Yes No NA NE
1 D. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or
f] ■ [I ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Cl
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
i 1
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page

n
Permit: AVVS250050 Owner -Facility: Chad Schneider
Facility Number : 250050
Inspection bale: 0,411012008 Inspection -type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Roullne
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110lbs.7
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type B
Soil Type 1
Seabrook loamy sand
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certifed Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Cl ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
18. bid the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all Components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box Wow.
VVUP?
❑
Page:5

{
0
Permit, AVVS250050 Owner -Facility: Chad Schneider
Facility Number:250050
Inspection Date: 04110l2008 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason Tor Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
Cl
Design?
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after a 1 inch rainfall 6 monthfy?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ Q ❑
23. If selected. did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ 11
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ [j ■ ❑
Otherlssues
Yes No NA NE
28. were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
McrialIty rat as that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes. contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page. 6

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Scrhneider
Inspection Date: 0411012008 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Otherlssues
31. Did the faGtrty fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as regtiired by Permit?
32. Did Reviewerllnspector tail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 25DO50
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
ONOO
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

a
0
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: Facility Status: Active Permit: AM250050 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/07/2007 Entry Time:07:30 AM _ Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Creekside Fgrrns Owner Email:
Owner: Chad Schneider _ Phone: [phone] _
Mailing Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd Grifton NC 285309063
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°22'34" Longitude: 77°17'34"
From Grifton travel Hwy 118 to Craven county line. After crossing countyline, turn leftcn NCSR 1459 and follow to stop sign. Turn
right and back left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and sign on right approx.. 1.5 miles.
Question Areas:
e Discharges & stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Melvin C Schneider Operator Certification Number: 22072
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative[s]: Name Title Phone
On -site representative Chad Schneider Phone:
24 hour contact name Chad Schneider Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stiiley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider
Facility Number : 250050
Inspection Date: 09/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Rout! ne
Inspection Summary:
`Facility did not have records ready and DWQ had to return to the facility two additional times to get all needed information. Inspection
dates include 9-7-07. 9-10-07, and 9-12-07.
COC and Permit 2009
Waste analysis 11-17-06 1 A
7-2-07 1.4
4-20-07 2.2
Soil test 11-27-06 with 0 lime needed
Cu and Zn values within range ) remember to get 2007 sample
Calibrations 8-29-06 } next one due 2008
Sludge survey 8-29-06 thick-2.89'
LTZ-4.42'
21 }No current waste sample for Feb 2007 irrigation - will note this time but next time it will be a NOV.
15}Need weed management plan
`update cop yield for coastal cutting in 2007
Pag e: 2

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 0910712007
Regulated Operations
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Design Capacity
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3,484
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agcon PRIMARY 08/26/95 19.50 32.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 0910712007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
n
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
n
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
n
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
it
0
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
it
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
Cl
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250050 Owner • Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number : 250050
Inspection pate: 09/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? n
Is PAN > 1001d10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
El
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection date: 09/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ■
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional Air
❑
❑
❑
■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number : 250050
Inspection Date: 09/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues
Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewe rllnspector fail to discuss rev iewlinspection with on -site representative? 0 ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

0 Division of Water quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency --- ---- —-------- _--
Facility Number: 250050 ^ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250050 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven_ Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/12/2006 Entry Time:09:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Creekside Farms Owner Email:
Owner: Chad Schneider Phone:[phone]
Mailing Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd Grifton NC 285309063 _
Physical Address: �l
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°22'34" Longitude: 77*17-34"
From Grifton travel Hwy 118 to Craven county line. After crossing county line, turn left on NCSR 1459 and follow to stop sign. Turn
right and back left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and sign on right approx.. 1.5 miles.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Melvin C Schneider
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 22072
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Chad Schneider Phone:
24 hour contact name Chad Schneider Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell Phone:
Inspector Signature, Date:
Secondary Inspectors):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number : 250050
Inspection Date: 09/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Permit 2009 - needs a copy of Certificate of Coverage
WUP 4-1-96
Waste Analysis 8-22-06 .96
4-19-06 1.9
12-21-05 1.0
Soil Test 1-20-06 with 0 tons of lime needed
Cu and Zn values within range
IRR-1 and IRR-2 Complete - have a lot of PAN left over - could use PAN to lower lagoon level before hurricane season.
"Overapplication on sm. grain in five fields in February 2006 with a -.76 in all five fields.
Crop yield records complete
Sludge survey 8-29-06 Thick-2.89 LTZ-4.42
Calibrations complete 8-29-06
Missing rainfall 7105 through 12105
Page' 2

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider
Inspection Date: 09/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Facility Number : 250050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 2,687
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 08/26/95 19.50 26.00
Page: 3

Permit: AW5250050 ❑wner- Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection date: 09/1212006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
n
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
fl
Application Field
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
■
n
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
■
n
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
■
n
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
U
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
00
or closure plan?
7. ❑o any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
n
110
$_ Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
D
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Appliati con
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
00
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
■
n
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? F1
Hydraulic Overload? rl
Frozen Ground? i1
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 09/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Aptia iican
Yes No NA NE
PAN? ■
Is PAN a 10%110 Ibs_? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass
[Hay]
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crap Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
■
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 0911212006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ n ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ■
120 Minute inspections? n
Weather code? n
Weekly Freeboard? n
Transfers? n
Rainfall? ■
Inspections after a 1 inch rainfall & monthly? n
Waste Analysis? n
Annual soil analysis? n
Crap yields? n
Stocking? n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? n ■ n n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment [NPDES only)? n n ■ 0
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? n ■ n n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? n ■ n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? n ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? n ❑ ■ n
Other Issues Ina nn
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? n n 0
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air DOOM
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AW5250050 Owner - Facility: Chad Schneider
Inspection Date: 09/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31_ Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewe rllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 250050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
0 M 0 0
❑■nn
n■nn
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250050 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250050 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven _ Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07/18/200Entry Time: 08:30 AM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Creekside Farms Owner Email:
i,• ScWtei4er
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1770 Honolulu Rd Grifton NC 285309063
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Goldsboro Hoo Farms In
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°22'39" Longitude: 77°17' 7"
35.37G L -1;. 2-7 Z
From Grifton travel Hwy 118 to Craven county line. After crossing county line, turn left on NCSR 1459 and follow to stop sign. Turn
right and back left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and sign on right approx.. 1.5 miles.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
® Other Issues
Certified Operator: Melvin C Schneider Operator Certification Number: 22072
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Chad Schneider Phone:
24 hour contact name Chad Schneider Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: —
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: Ibs N per 1000 gal
2-16-05 = 1.5
8-31-04 = 1.5
Sample pulled in June 2005 but report not back yet
Soil test June 2004 and lime was applied.
The irrigation records are recorded and balanced out - however, the irrigation events beginning on April 23 & up until July 7 are not
covered by a current waste analysis. Chad will correct this as soon as the pulled waste analysis comes back.
Everything looks good------- Just watch that freeboard level!!!!!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250050 Owner -Facility: Chad Schneider
Inspection Date. 07/1812005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
0 Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3,200
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Tune Identifier Closed Date Start Date Desianed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 08125/95 19.50 19.50
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250050 Owner -Facility: Chad Schneider Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 07/18/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Dischar4es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Yes
❑
No NA
0110
NF
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑
Cl
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d- Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑
Yes
❑
No NA
❑
NF
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe erosion,
❑
❑
seepage, etc-)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑
❑
❑
closure plan?
7- Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8- Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks
❑
and/or wet stacks)
9- Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
❑
❑
improvement?
Yes
No NA
NF
Waste ApWication
10- Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
11- Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals [Cu, Zn, etc]?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 100K110 lbs.?
❑
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda
Grass
(Hay)
Crap Type 2
Small Grain
(Wheat,
Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250050 Owner -Facility. Chad Schneider Facility Number. 250050
Inspection Date: 0711812005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Crap Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑ M ❑ ❑
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fai€ to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
0 ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
N ❑
❑
i &.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
Yes
0 ❑
No NA
❑
NE
Records and Dorumprits
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Pen -nit readily available?
❑
s ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0011
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
inspections after a 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250050 Owner • Facility: Chad Schneider
Facility Number: 250050
Inspection Date: 07/1812005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Reoords and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fall to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ M ❑
Otherlssues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those mortality ❑ ■
El El
rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality oonoem? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality
representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32, Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewrinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
00011
Page: 5

Type of Visit D Compliance Inspection ❑ Operation Review ❑ Structure Evaluation ❑ Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine ❑ Complaint Q Follow up 0 Referral Q Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 11-17-2DU4 Time: 135D
Facility Number
O Not Oeerational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted [3 Certified ® Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...............
FarmName: C=.&dde.FArM3............................................................................I......... County: Cxaxgn................................... ............ l ARG......,
Owner Name: Chad ........................................ Scttaeidex ...... ............................................ Phone No.021.52,."80 .................... ..........
MailingAddress: 1:I7.Q_Hox1.QWu.Ro-a.......................................................................... ........................................................... 8.5 {1..............
FacilityContact:......................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:..................................................
Onsite Representative: Cbad.56[AWrx......................................................................... integrator: GOWNhura.H99-Fa rims.......................................
Certified Operator: Melyi-C ............................... 5Rhm7lilu...... ................... .............. Operator Certification Number:22Q7.2......... .......... ........
Location of Farm:
From Grifton'travel Hwy IIS to Craven county line. After crossing county fine, turn left on NCSR 1459 and follow to stop
sign. Turn right and back left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and sign on right approx.. 1.5 miles. .r
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 22& 1 39 Longitude F 77 • 17 37 u
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Ca acity Population
® Wean to Feeder
3200
❑ Layer
❑Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
on-_ airy
❑ Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
I[] Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
3,200
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
96,000
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1
©ischames & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gai/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... ..........
Freeboard (inches): 31"
12112103
Continued

Facility Number: 25-50 Date of Inspection 11-17-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes N No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Co No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes N No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes N No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc > 3000
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below El Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes N No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes N No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes N No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments (refer to question #):. Explain any YES answers and/or any -recommendations or any other comments.- .
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): Cj Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
,cords available
aste analysis: 10-15-03 - 1.5 lbs
7-7-03 - 1.4 lbs
3-21-03 - 1.8 lbs
3-2-04 - 1.5 lbs
6-15-04 - 1.4 lbs
8-31-04 - 0.821bs
UP - allows - irrigation window on coastal to be from March to October and possibly to graze. Also it allows 50
s or 100 lbs with restrictions on s. grain o/s - This year has opted for hay and 50 lbs on overseed.
)il analysis - 6-24-04, 4-3-03
-igation records are complete and balanced out.
'ovided a disc with the new irrigation records - NOTE - you only need to use the records that apply to you - IRR 1,
.R 2, freeboard, etc.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B. Hqdison
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date:
12112103
Continued

Facility Number: z5-5a Date of Inspection 11-1772004
Required
Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes.
N No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
OR No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N Na
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
N No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form []Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
-
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
0
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:.
New permit requires the following: AL
* rainfall records
* crop yields
* mortality/stocking records - which are available
* IRR 1 with weather codes & 120 minute irrigation checks
* lagoon integrity inspection after > 1.0" of rainfall and at least monthly inspections
* sludge survey and irrigation calibration by Oct. 2006
Continue to practice weed control - Consult with extension or area agronomist for guidance.
Records and farm are well managed.
If you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or me @ 252-948-3842.
12112103

(Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0► Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 25 g0 Date of Visit: 11120120Af1 Time: 9:A0 Printed on: 11122/2000
Q Not Operational O Selow Threshold
O Permitted 13Certified ® Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ........................
Farm Name: C.t:eeMlile.FArMS ............................. County: Cr.8yjClj .............................................. W. ARO.......
Owner Name: Chad ....................................... h5ghacwwr............ ...................................... Phone No: (252).52,4 0.Q7.............................................
FacilitvContact: ..................................................... ......................... Title: .......... ...................................................... Phone No: -•-----••---- .....................................
Mailing Address: 1.77.Q.H9.n4I.u1u.RQad_...................................................................... G.t:ffjQiA..x.0..................... ............................. ... ...... 2153.0 .............
Onsite Representative:Gltasl.SchmcIdgr........................................................................ Integrator: .Qldsburo.tlQ�lEax......................................
Certified Operator-MClritl.................................... S.sb.6dex........................................ Operator Certification Number:22A7.2.............................
Location of Farm:
From Grifton travel Hwy 118 to Craven county line. After crossing county line, turnleft on NCSR 1459 and follow to stop
ign. Turn right and back left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and sign on right apporx. 1.5 miles.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ' 22 39 Longitude
Design Current
Swine C'anarity Pnnulatinn
® Wean to Feeder
3200
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy I +_ I
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,200
Total SSLW 96,000
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impact4
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. Udischarge is observed, was the conveyance mart -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (if yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
identifier: .................................................. ............
Freeboard (inches): 41
r inn

S/00 Continued on hack
Facility Number: 25-50 Date of Inspection 1112012000 Printed on: 11/22/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes N No
(1f any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12• Crop type Bermuda Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
❑ Yes
N No
No Violations;or defic'rencies,were noted -during this'Visit:: You will -receive no further
: correspondence about'this:visit..
analysis 8/15/00
F4
IReviewer/Inspector Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall

I ReviewerAaspector Signature: Date: 5100
Facility Number: 25-50 Date of Inspection 11no12Qoo Printed on: 11/22/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
® No
28.
is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
® No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
J
VIM

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
G Other Agency
Type of Visit • Compliance Inspection ❑ Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine ❑ Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
............... ...
Facility' Number 5 50 Date of Visi€: Tune: �Printed vo: 7/21/2000
Q Not O erationa1 Q Below Threshold
© Permitted 13 Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .......................
Farm Name: C/E¢k5�L Count°. - .... -..-.C-�V.'..................................................
OMrner Name: ................c.k'a ...--..... S c 1 , — d dew Phone No:.........--.............-.............
Facilit►- Contact:
Mailing Address: ............................... • .-.-......
.................. ...............
❑nsite Representative: ��� 5Gt^a , j.a......, ...................-1.
-,J itic:................................................................ Phone No:
........................... -...-........-....... .-... .-
Integrator: -•-••• --- -G-•�4 r
Certified Operator-...............
perator:..............G�^ - .......��.A,#, r, �vf .......... ..................... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farris:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse latitude ' 9 •4 Longitude a 6 «
Design Current
S►One C'anaeity Ponulation
"wean to Feeder
3200
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacitv Population
❑ Layer I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I I[] Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Ligrwbn Area JE1 Spray Field :1rea
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No liquid W,,te Management System
Discharge ti & Stream Irnpactti
1. Is any discharge ohservcd from any part of [hc operation? ❑ Yes f'No
Discharge ori-inated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. wns the convevanc•o man-irtade" ❑ Yes ❑ No
1). li discharge is observed. slid it reach Water of' [tic sulk'' {ll yes, nosily DWQ) j] Yes ❑ No
c, ll dischar x is obscr�-cd. what is the estimated flow in gailmin'
d- Dies discharge bypass a lagoon system'! (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'? ❑Yes SNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ffNo
Waste Collecliun &: Treattuent
4. Is storage capacity (1-reeboard plus storm steerage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yeti ONo
Structure I Suucturo 2 Structure Structure 4 Strucltire 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..... ---- ......
Freel)nard (inches): L
5/00
Continued on bark

Facility Number: ',, — O Date of Inspection //-20' 70 Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑Yes
VkNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
8. Does any part of the waste management System other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
C4No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
(SNo
Waste AppliL'atiflrl
lfl. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
Z No
I I _ Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload.
❑Yes)
No
11 Crop type b[.r w
11 Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
T,No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acrca4,c for land application'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c] This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
allo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
'� No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps. etc.)
❑ Yes
No
19. Does record keeping need improvement.' Oel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'!
❑ Yes
(Z No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
No
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
21 Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative:'
❑ Yes
No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'!
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
9 No
yii>l"atiatis:oi- &fide.ncies .were noted, ditrilig this:visit; . Yoii will -r. &,stye lid.further: :
correspaticYence: a�aut: this .visit .. .: .. . :
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
µf yvs V IVad I
IV
Reviewer/Inspector Name C_gr %A 1%, ,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 0$11Q Date: 5100

Facility Number: ZS -sty Date of Iaspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application'? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon'? ❑ Yes ®,No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 'rR No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
J
5/00

Facility Number 25 - 5a Date: 110104 Time: 900 Time On Farm: 40 WARO
Farm Name Creekside Farms County Craven
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 1770 Honolulu Road Grifton NC 28530
Onsite
Representative Chad Schneider Integrator IGoldsboro Hog Farms
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
Compliance Inspection (plot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
Li No Animals-uate Last Uperatea:
❑ Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Q Routine
0 Response to DWQIDENR referral
0 Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
0 Response to complaint/local referral
Q Requested by producer/integrator
0 Follow-up
0 Emergency
O Other...
Design Current Design Current
Caoacitv Population C P I t'
® Wean to Feeder
El Feeder to Finish
El Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
El Gilts
❑ Boars
3200
3200
a ac o u a ion
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands?
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees,
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure?
❑ yes ® no
❑ yes ® no
❑ yes ® no
El yes El no
El yes ®no
El yes ®no
5tructurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier11
Level (Inches) 23
CROP TYPES lCoastal Bermuda -hay I ISmall grain overseed
CPPAVFIFI n
SOIL TYPES Sc
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
Facility Number 25 - 50 Date: 2/10/04 I
PARAMETER
r7 .9 Warta rnill iaavinn cite
Q No assistance provided/requested

..- V... .--.. .� .-
❑*9. Waste spill contained on site
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
❑ 14. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or a 10 lbs.
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
N 1 B. Late/missing waste analysis
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
Regulatory Referrals
] Referred to DWQ Date:
] Referred to NCDA Date:
] Other... Date:
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
MADE BY OPERATION
low areas in coastal bermuda spray fields have
been leveled.
2.
3.
4.
5.
A
I tt;HN1GAL A55151 ANUh Needed
Nroylaea
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
❑
❑
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
30. 2H.0200 re -certification
❑
❑
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
33. Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
36. Sludge removallciosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker checklcalibration
❑
❑
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
Cl
43. Irrigation system designtinstallation
❑
❑
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
Cl
47. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationtrecommendations
❑
❑
49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
❑
❑
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
52. Suffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
69. Soil andfor waste sampling education
❑
❑
Facility Number 25 - 50 Date: 2110/04
COMMENTS:
57 03/10/03

nail grain overseed has been planted and in good condition.
aste analysis dated 10/15/03 nitrogen is 1.5 Ibs11000 gallons
717103 nitrogen is 1.4 Ibs11000 gallons
3/21103 nitrogen is 1.8 lbs11000 gallons
:member to take soil test for 2004 and follow lime requirements.
There is not a waste analysis to cover irrigation events on small grain over seed after 12/15/03. Unable to answer
:stion #4 and 14 and 15. Remember to take waste analysis 60 days before 160 days after irrigation event.
R2 records made available for review.
!ed to place copy of COC in record book.
goon level is recorded weekly with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation events.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST Martin Mcf_awhorn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 2123/04 Entered By: Martin McLawhorn
58 03/10/03

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit O• Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency [Notification O 0ther ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 25 50 Hate of visit: 4l3t112ptl2 Time: l3tlll
-------- -- Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ❑ Certified M Conditionally Certified © Registered pate Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Cxeelr, e.Fa Count: rrt►em..... .. ... . ARO.......
Onner Name: Chard .............................•--------- Schneider- .... ......................... •-.... .............. Phone No: =.S. 4-01117 .................
Mailing Address: 1.T.7Q.Howlti a Road.-----------•............................................................ laadtunt--NC -•----------••----••-------•---..................... 18510.............
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: ChaJd.SchneWer......................... .............................................. Integrator: G*k6hojm.H9.g.Fwm&.......................................
Certified Operator: l!'1ejyhL.C.-............................. Srhu1da............... ... _................... Operator Certification Number:2ZO72 ............................
Location of Farm:
From Grifton travel Hwy 118 to Craven county line. After crossing county line, turnleft on NCSR 1459 and follow to stop sign. +
urn right and back left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and sign on right appom 1.5 miles.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 1 35 • 22 4 39 66 Longitude 7T • i 7 37 u
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine.. Capacity Population
Poultry
-Capacity:Population Cattle
-Ca aeity iPa ulation
® Wean to Feeder
3200
3200
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
n
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
----- ::
.......
Total -Design Capacity
3,200
❑ Gilts
--- . - Total SSLW.
96,000
❑ Soars
.......... . .......
Numberof.Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present Lagron Area Spray Field ZV-1
Hoiding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
�.
4Disc�harges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is obsmed, was the conveyance man-rnade? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge: is obscivcd, did it reach Watcr of the State? (If yes. notitV DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated floe• in gailmin?
d. ❑oc, discharge bypass a Iag[xau cystcm`? (If yes, uoEifv ©WQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past di.charge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse: impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge'? ❑ Yes 0 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (fi-eeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Sirn(;tuiv 3 Structure mf Structure 5 5lnieture 6
ItIcntifcer:
Freeboard (inches}: ...............22............ . ....

05103101
Facility Number: 25-50
Date of Inspection 1 4/30/2002
Continued
5. Arc there anv immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
& Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenaneetimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (flay) Small Grain Dvcrsced
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WIJP. checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20, is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/usipection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
ANTM17MET
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
t© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.,
_. •._.,.,�_v
Gommen ta {refer. tcs.gaesttxrn # xplauit any,YES"ius+vers an+llor: an . reou�iinendations or, iiriy: istier`;cameists'�=
Use.:drawttt._ ':.
gs:of facility to. betterae laiii:sltuatwna: {vim axdttloaal;pas as: zseeessary):` °"
�._........:-._� ...::. �._.. , ._, �,.. .. - _ �� -...,. teld C ❑ coal -
- ❑ F' Copy F" Notes
*General permit dated 6/22/01 and on site. f
*Waste analysis dated 4/25/02 nitrogen is 1.7 lbs/1000 gallons
112102 nitrogen is 1.5 lbs/1000 gallons
814101 nitrogen is 1.3 lbs/1000 gallons
*Soil test dated 614101 no lime required Cu and Zu within guidelines. Remember to take soil test for 2002 and follow lime requirements.
*Lagoon level is recorded weekly.
*Small grain ovcrs, was removed by April 7.
Reviewer/Inspector Name - -
Martin McLawhyrg--
i�oviorvo�R.+ona.-fur Cin�.vi.��a• 77wfn•

05103101 ConfiHued
Facility Number: 25-5U Date of Inspection 4/30/2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
2T Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
2& is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance: problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
*Re(ords are complete and balanced.
**Need to lower lagoon as weather pernuts and by following guidance from waste plan.
n
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ' CK No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
J

ti. k)A Z' C"
DF WArFRQ Mictsaer F. Easfey
Governor
y r WIIG2rr! G. Ross Jr., Secretary
❑ De;=tment d Envmanrnerrt and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water auaRy
To: Produces'
From: Daphne B. Cullom��
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2002
Enclosed please find a ropy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facility
by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Pk2w read this inspection and keep it with all other
documents pertaining to your animal[ operation for fWum inspedions.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA)AMP); (2) the
farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2110217, Senate Sill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or nmofl;
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the
General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
(p The maximum waste level in lagoonslstorage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CA WMP. At a minimum, maximum waste
level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hour storm
event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
(o An analysis of the liquid animal waste fi-om the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and at least
within 60 days (before or after) ofthe date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen,
Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper-
qo Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
q) The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wasteVsoil analysis and land irrigation records.
These records should bemaintained by the facility ownerlmanager in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years.
oQ Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land lication rates exceed the Plant Available
Nztroen (PAN) rate for the receivinse crop a result in nmoff durins? any given apthiication.
c? All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages_ The outlet can be
another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
(p It is Wgcsted. not a Lquhvznestt, to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to suffice waters of the State will have to apply for a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, efFective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and coopa-dtion during the inspection- If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-44Cr6481, ext.
321 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: C'WaRO
DBC Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-Wl (Telephone) 252-946-9245 (Fax)

w
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other ❑ denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 111112U112 Time: 9:55 am
p Not Operational p Below I hreshold
Permitted m Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:.........
Farm Name: Creekside Farms County: Craven ................................................ !AR.CI.......
Owner Name: Chad Schneider Phone No: [phone]
Mailing Address: 17.7.Q.Huoo1uluRuad.......................................................................... Griffon...NC....... ............. ................... ........... ...... ... 28530 .......
Facility Contact .. .................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Onsite Representative: CbadSrhneidex,..G eorge.Pettus....................................... Integrator: GnldsSnra.Hog.Farms........... I ..........
....
Certified Operator:lulel►in.C.............................. Schneider........................................ Operator Certification Number: 22p'I.2................... ........
..
Location of Farm:
E'rom Grifton travel Hwy I IN to Craven county line. Alter crossing county line, turnlett on NUSK 1459 and follow to stop �
;ign. Turn right and hack left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and sign on right apporx. 1.5 miles. L f
T
® Swine ❑ Poultry p Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• ©� ®�� Longitude ©■
L
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
® Weanto Feeder
❑ eeder to Finish
❑ rarrow to can
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design- Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ on- Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,200
c_ Total Sstw 96,010
-:
_ NuriiberaoflJagnons ' ❑ u sur ace rains resent ❑Lagoon Area ❑ pray' tie rea
`..x Holdiiig PoiidsJ Solid Traps 10 No tqutWaste Management spystem
Discharge s & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? []Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ©yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4• is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway []Yes ®No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches)

rr
.a
aci ity um er: 25-50
Date of Inspection 1711/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN p Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
p Yes ® No
p Yes H No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
❑Yes ®No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Manaap
gement Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage &. General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ® No
Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
Yes ® No
p No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit, You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Ful
1-1
M
analysis 6/4/01; no Iime required.
ation records complete with nitrogen balance; no overapplication noted.
board levels recorded weekly.
-ral Permit issued 6/22/01.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signaturelag,&,,,. (-3 A, V V o Date:

05103101
Continued
act ity N um er: 25_50 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
p No
Iiquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
p Yes
® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
p Yes
IS No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not iocated near the liquid surface of the Iagoon?
l7 Yes
®No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
p Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
p Yes
®No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
p Yes
p No
an U
.::::h '�::'xu�:1.x."F.rEdE��:::��:5� �:�BJ�. ...�s'?E..:� _ ..� .:.rK=�' � d:a..�3c��.3�'..�:'.«':x.'�•

r x' © Division of Soil and Water ConservatiiinR --'Operation-ei'iew.<
E3 vision of Soil and Water,Cnnser�ation - CnmpliaticeInspection=:' .
Division of Water alt '-.Com lisance.:llns coon: = - - _ f3' . F PE - `tom= _ -
r
"::... g Opera Agency - Other bon R6eew _
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review ❑ Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection
l Ime of Inspection 0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .-..... I eRk—S.!�..` v�!l6 County. _.......-. le`OuNQ.v�..............................
Owner Name:......... 7 .... .. Phone No: 07 �.a-.`.�."..........................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:.........................
l
Mailing Address: ..
Onsite Representati►e: �.!!1.�t .l � V �e 3
................. . ................... ..................................
Certified Operator:..-.�.�,�j�t,..........................
5
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
r..i r7..1............................... .185......CJ..
Integrator: „-
Operator Certification Number; „2, Z-O.7Z_,,,_.•,••,
Latitude • E J` •` Longitude ' 4 6°
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Population
QWean to Feeder 3 Z GO
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Soars
Design Current Design Current'
Poultry -Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I JE:1 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
= Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number. of.Lagoons ❑ Suhsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
l�Ja
Holdiifig'Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [;�No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DW-Q) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If dischargc is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? {If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes &TNa
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 12No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes E?ff, o
Structure ] Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier:
et
Freeboard(inches): ........ sa act.. .......... ............I..... ---•. ........ .... --........ --......... ........ ....... ....-............_.................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes &I/No
seepage, etc.)
3123199 Continued on back

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
-► Q
6.
Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'?
❑ Yes
2"No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7-
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
&?f;o
S.
Does any part of the waste management system ether than waste structures require main tenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
RNo
9.
Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings'?
❑ Yes
[;r%
'Waste
Application
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
92�140
1 l
. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
❑ No
12.
Crop type 413_ & az
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in th ertified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
RINo
14,
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Docs the receiving crap need improvement? ❑ Yes y❑'No
M. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 2-NO
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
I& Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(icl W UP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes [.2(No
19, Does record keeping need improvement? el irrigation, eebo d, waste analysis soil sa ple repo E► Yes ❑ No
20- Is facility not in compliance with any applic ack criteria in effect at the time of esign. ❑ Yes E?No
21 - Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [I10
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes V'No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ONo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ENo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes [/No
0; fl •Yiaiatibhs;o" . deficie�rtcies rizere h, bie'd' 0'&' ing •t;his- visit. - Y;oir will -kecd , ,e do further ;
eori- s nricience: about: this visit.... • ' ... ::: :
Comments{refer to.questi6n #):.'Eicplazn:an YES`answers andlgr:an recommendations or any=other=commi nis m°., ` - ..
_. Y - —
[1se'drawin of facili to h_etierp.,.ex lain situattonss: {use additzonal: p g a es as necessa
- -- -_ rY
(��i [v eta ,�� P fit► e b� ��
P ff � 4 1
��• � �5ti $ '5k�� 1 O� � .a 1bS .'16d��S[,` ► t � to i i •� l65 , iD4o
r o 1L� ► r r i ' �-•�- cic�-c.� ► -ki p S r��
Y `Ci�l] m ' --a �� wl s D 1 lr� t .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
w.
ReviewerfInspector Signature: Date: ��• ��.-0�___
3/23/99

i
Facility Number-,,;? —50 Date of Inspection (p- `(] Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes [;�No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 21'io
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 93""No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 2 No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes [2'No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged Fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
lx.u. s � ; �.ei��-e._�-4�.�e� v � ca rc� � w ►�-L�_ �p�e.. C�d�-e�.� Vu�.�.?
�r - asa �6 - �� 91 1."-" e_ a.
C'VU t �- s
J
5/00

I;Dir'isiasofSoll'snd Water
. es 'X r
Type of Visit ()Compliance Inspection aD Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason far Visit 0 Routine Q Complaint Q Fallow up O Emergency Notification Q Other
❑ Denied Access
Mm� ofVisit: �tRWt Timr: 8:3U Printed on: 6t1t204t
FacilityNumber Z5 5U
Not Operational Q Below Threshold
© Permitted E3 Certified ® Conditionally Certificef 13 Registered pate Las( Hperatei! FarAbv►c'1'IrreshvW: ............. -••-•-•••-
Farm Name: +Cx=k9dc.Feu:tnts.......................--................. ................ County: �xat:�u�............... -- ...... ...... -- .... ..... WARO.---...
ot■ner Name: Chad.. ................... -- . Schnteider...._................._...... .......... Phone No:(251).5.24-DIM7....._.......................................... ........
17ailing Address: 172Ik.HunojujtL o&d................................................... --.............. Gr t m..NC...--....----..----..----.....------...---..._.---........ za';J t.......----..
I: acilit+ Contact: ................................................. ......... ---••--............. Title: .............................................. Phone No: .
(lnsite Repr"ent.atiyc:.Chad.srbtnewer........................ Integrator: ��ulti5kt[�x[t.lio�.Fat;nt�............
................................................. ....---...---•--.......---.
Certified Operator:.1.Ylelyixt................................... Scbmider....................................... Operator Certification plumber: 2ZQ212... ............. __.........
Location of Farm:
From Griffon travel H►►•y 118 to Craven county line. After crossing county line, turnleft on NCSR 1-159 and follow to stop sign. i
Turn right and hack left on NCSH 1458. Farm path and sign on right apporx. 1.5 miles.
® Swine ❑Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 OF 22 39 �� Lungittlde 77 • 17 37
Design Current
Swine Canarity Ponuiation
® Wean to Feeder
3200
1600
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Pouhry Capacity Pa ulation Cattle Capacity Population
❑ l.a�-er ❑ llain•
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Main-
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,200
Total SSLW 96,000
Number of Laronns 1 ❑ Sulrsurfacc Drains Present ❑ t.aecxsn Area P Sprsav Field Arta
Holding Ponds 1 Sofid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Mana„ement System
Dischar+ris & Stream Irn[t:rets
1. Is any discharge ohsemed from any part of the operation?
1)kchargc ongiaamie:d at ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a- if di�;chanL=e is ob.sen cd. ►vas the conveyance man-made 9
h- Ifdigcharge is o6sut'u1, slid it reach "Inter of tha S1;ati'' (iftC•_ uotilillWQ)
c. If discliarec is obscrvcd- what is t1w esrimaied floe- in i!aliniin'
d- Does di-;QIjaagc bNp:a•,,;a Iagcwic ' (1f�e,, a3LlaFft l3W[])
2. 1s there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse: impacts to the Water; of the State other than from a discharge'?
Waste Collection & Treatment
k. I; storage capacity (lreuboard plus stonn storage) less than adequate? ❑ SpilhNav
SFructaare I Sti u.-ture ? Structure 3 StrcEcture •l Stl-ULItire J
Idelitiiiea : ..........�.:..........
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yew ❑ No
❑ Ye, ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yeti X No
Yes 9 No
Sin t.tuie G
Freeboard (inches) : ...............21.............. ........................

05103101 Continued
Facility Number. 25-50 Date of hin ec•tion 2I21l2DDl Printed «n: 6111/2001
5. Am- then any' immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures ob,,mcd? (icl trees, se►,crc. erosion, El Yes ®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a wash; management or
closure plan? El Yes N No
any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do anv of the structures need maintcnanulimpro<<c-rnenE? ❑ Yes N No
K Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9_ Do any stuctures lack adequate_ gauged markers with required maxinmunm and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
NN'aste Application
if]_ Are there: any buffer, that need nmaintcriancerimprovement? l] Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ I iydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (I lay) Small Grain (h°crxLed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management plan (CAWMI')`? ❑ Yes N No
1 4.
a) Does the tacility° lack adequate acreage for Iand application?;
Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettahle acre. determination?
❑ Yc-s
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yeti
N No
I G.
Is there a lack of adcquale wayic application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18,
Hoes the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available`
(ie! NVUP. check -lists. design_ maps. etc.)
❑Ye.;
N No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, fnxhoard, v►aste analysis &;,roil sample rep arts)
N Yes
ii No
20,
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
2 I .
Did the facility fail to have a actively ec:rtiiicd operator in charge?
l,J Yes
N No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
freeboard
(ic/ discharge, problems. oycr application)
❑ Yes
X No
23,
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewhuspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
2 t.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency`?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliant; of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
E3
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
...
Comments (refer.ty question #) :::Egplaln am TES answers and/or, and ree6mmendations or any other comments
.._ ...............................
Use drawings of facilityto better explain7 situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
* General Permit has been applied for. _
* Disc:u.+ul IRR2lwaste schWuling.
* Waste analysis date 1/29/01. Nitrogen is l.ii Ibs11000 gallons. On 8/15/00 nitrogen was 1_4 Ibs/I(K)O gallons.
2 I . Therc was not a soil test lakeu for 2000. Rcmcmhcr to take soil test for 2001. Bc sun to lollo►►' liinc rcquircineist.
* Lagoon level is recorded weekly through Noverrmbcr_ 2000. Not required to record level until General Permit is received. j
* IRR2 records are balanced_ jl
19, N/A 1
* Need to louver lagoon as weather and field conditions permit.
IReviewer/Inspector Name Martin McLaw•horn entered by Della Robbins I
Reviewertinspector Signature.: Date:

•�-rx�x..«.,M_, vr�'cu.:.:..�rr::2.�r .:`>vtrr:."F- ??in'S' ..-;^.:` .'.. r,":.":,.
Division of water Qualitt Y
==
::.
<llii isivnand- .Wafer Cunservat' — .
�...._ .....:xx-... ... - a.�: of.Soil
. >.h......x�•:sw,a7: ��.;ak• ter.-,,s,v .-.�'��n. r ,. M �::;:r°.,. �%� :v;�:�'s�;.. ,.
of Visit n Compliance Inspection ❑ Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
!Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint ❑ Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other
❑ Denied Access
tlatc of Visit:IiClfIr2000 Time:9:tM1
Facilit}• Nwnbcr 25 SQ
------ .e--- ---_---------------=M_._.� _---:- Nut ❑ erational Q Below Threshold
0 Permitted O Certified ® Conditionally Certified o Registered Date Last Operated or Abo►e'Threshold: ............
Farm Name: Ca.Mk de.Fair'jW................-...............................-............---..................... Grunt%: Graven ................. ........................ -- W. ARQ.......
Ootter Name: Chad ........................ ............. - h5chaftiidder........................ ............ ............... Phone No: (252).524-1080........................................................
Facility- Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: ress: „20.11unral n. a' ............... ...... lG.tin..NC......................... .... 2 3i.30.............
0nsile. Re1)resentati►e: CbL;W.&brjCWrr...................................-...---...............-............. Integrator: Goldsbon.11ug.Farms................
Certified Operator: Mch'itL................................... ........................................ Operator Certification Number:22,972 .........
Uwation of Farm:
From Griffon travel Hw-y 118 to Craven county line. After crossing county tine, turnleft on NCSR 1459 and follow to stop sign. �
Turn right and back left on NCSR 14,58. Farm path and sign on right apporz. 1.5 miles. "
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ' 22 39 Longitude 77 'F 17 37
Design Current
Swine Capacity Ponulation
® Wean to Fexxfer
3200
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ I,ayzr ❑ I]ain
❑ Non-1_ay'cr ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Ckher
Total Design Capacity 3,200
Total SSLW 95,000
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drain4 Present ❑ Lacuun Area ❑ Srray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar}cs & Stream Impact.
1. Is and' discharge ob-.Ln ed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
17i:c}large ciriginawd at: ❑ [Aeoon ❑ Spra►' Field ❑ Other
a _I Yes ❑ No
b. Lt dl.charae is observed, did it reacli Water of the Statc? (If ve st notify DWQ) [:]Yes ❑ No
c: It'dischame is ob:en•ed. i0mt is the estiniahA tlo■► in galiinin"
d, i?uc i!i;cl�.i.rge b� lia„ x lagix�ii .�;1en17 [11'� e�- ttr3iily 171A`tl ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. is there e%•idence of past discharge from any part of the operation`? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any advers impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a diseharge9 ❑ Yes, ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storin storage) luss than adequate? ❑ Spillwa► ❑ Yes M No
5trucnrr:: I Structure 2 Structure 3 structure 4 Stnictuw 5 Siructur-, 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches) :................11........................ ...

S/Q0
Facility Number: 25—Sil hate of Inspection 1112o12tHitl
5. Are Were any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie1 trees, s xere erosion.
seepage. etc.)
6. Are there: strictures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions " was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify- UWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste managcntcni system other than wastc structures require maintenance./improvement?
4. Do anv strctures lack adequate. gauged markers .with rcquirW maximum and nsininsum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste- Application
10. Are there any buffer, that need maintenancelimprovement"
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ I :xcessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Bermuda Small Grain
13. I)o the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility Iack adequate acreage for land application?
b) hoes the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15, F)ocs the receiving crop need improvement?
16_ Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
Reetuircd Records & Documeuts
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readih- available'?
1 R- Does, the facility fail to have all components of The Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily' available?
(ie/ WLIP. chLcklists, design_ maps, etc.)
M T)oLs record keeping need improvement? (icl irrigation, freeboard-, waste analysis &_ soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as requiredhy General Penuuit`?
tie/ di, -charge_ fre aboard problems,, over application)
21 Did Revic.ver/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
24, Does facility rcquirc a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were an), additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
13 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further
correspondence about this visit.
Continued on back -
[:]Yes
® No
❑Yes
NNo
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yus
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
N No
......
Comments E. er to )F�pfai
q .uesttan.#}i:....n any::YES.`anr`+ rs:andlor an}r recain-endations or an' other _60- mments
llse drawings_vf..xv r;:tsp.I etfer.ex is in situations.. use addi#ionai. a es:as necessary :
Waste analysis 8115100
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
FOINEW164-M
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ YesN No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
-1
Rey ie"erllnspector Name

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint Q Fallow up 0 Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
acilit_►' Number Sit
Dute of Visit: 7-3-2t]OU Time: 82fl Printed on: 8/8/2000
F25
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
© Permitted © Certified ® Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Aho►e'Chreshold: .....................
Farm Name: Ca.wkside_Farrms.....•--- .... -- ... ....................................................................... County- CxaV.rn..................................... W.K.U----...
O►v ner Name: ChAd....................................... Sshneidex................. ........ ................... ...... Phone. No:(252).524—.48.07................ ..................................... ..
Facility' Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: j.7.7A.Hoaoturftt.KaA.d..................... .............................................................. G. ftjk..NC................----........ ... . 285,30 .............
Onsite Representative: Cha,d.SchneW r.... ............ ................................................ ......... integrator: G(iIl[I�hQ�u.HA�.I ktt......................
Certified Operator: . Scb midju................. .. Operator Certification Number: =11,............... •........
Location of Farm:
From Grifton travel Hwy- 118 to Craven county- line. After crossing county line, turnleft on NCSR 1459 and follow to stop sign.
turn right and hack left on NCSR 1458. Farm path and sign on right apporx. 1.5 miles.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude f 35 • 22 39 Longitude 77 OF 17 37
Design Current
Swine Canarity Pnnulatinn
® Wean to Feeder
3200
1600
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wcan
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry PopulationCattle Capacity Population
1❑ l..avcr ❑ Dair►'
E1 Non -Laver I I ID Non -Dais
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,200
Total SSLW 96,000
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lag Z Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Soffd Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management S►-stem
a<
Disrharg,es & Stream Tmirac is
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [:)Other
a. II'discharge is obscn•cd. ►Fa, tltc conveyaaco titan-niadc'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is obsencd. did it reach Water of the Slate" (if yes_ nolifv DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estinialod flow in gal/inin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lag4xIn sv'stem'? {If►es. notilV I)WQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there cvidence of past discharge from any part of the operation' ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse irnpacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge'? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
•l, is storage capacity (h=board plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Sirucnire l Structure 2 Structur4 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..........primaq................. ...... .............. ...... ...................................... ......... ....... ............. ............................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ........................... ......... ................ ....................

5100
Facility Number: 25-50 Date of Inspection 7-3-2444 Printed cin:
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage. etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
H . is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic 0vcrioad
Conttinued on back
8/812000
El Yes NNo
❑Yes NNo
❑Yes
No
[:]Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain OversLed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management flan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facihty is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
IT Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readih, available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WI1P, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. I.)oes record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in efTect at the time of design?
21- 1)id the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergenev situations as required by General Permit?
(icl discharge. freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24- Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0 AO violatio6s or:defidencies were noted during this visit:. Yeti will:receive'nv further:
correspolidence about this visit.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Ycs N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Comments (refer to question it): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
* Coastal Bermuda field is established under a solid set sNstem A,
* bast waste analysis at 2.7 lbs/1000 gal. (previous sample dated 1-24-00 at 2.3 lbsll000 gal.)
* Last soils report dated 12-30-99 with less than 0.3 Vacre lime needed
* Mr. Schneider kouping lagoon level records but operation is certified only so not required at this time. Will contact Sonya Avant to have
address and phone number changed and will check on status of General Permit notification. Note: operation is not scheduled to receive
General Permit application at this time.
* Operation secured SWCC Emergency BMP plan amendment but reverted back to original waste plan
* lltR2 records are complete with no over application
Reviewer/Inspector Name Pat Ho6kr_ 252-946448I, ` "_

lReviewer/Inspector Signature: ., Date:. r 5/00
Facility Number: 25:7 Date of Inspt- tion 7-3-2000 Printed on: S/U2 00
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation'?
27. Are there any dead animals aol disposed of properly within 24 hours" El Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence: of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation. asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure. and/or public properly)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon'? ❑ Yes ® No
30Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) note? (i.e. broken fan belts. missing or
or broken fan blade(s). inoperable shutters. etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? [:]Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged [ill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover`? ❑ Yes ❑ No
r*on ornments and/or Drawings.
* Will e-mail irrigation record Excel file to Mr. Schneider - chadcra:ksidc(a�aol.com. Note: file was e-mailed on 7-6-00- �

r
a umbiun uI 3on anu vviatcr "inervation - %jpryauun ,eCvrew
p Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
C3 Other Agency - Operation Review
p Routine p Complaint p Follow-up o inspection p o o►►•-up ot DSWC revre►v ter
Facilitv Number 11me of lnsliveliors
Time of Iw;pectioI1 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[� Permitted Certified Conditionally Certified a Registered in Not peratl❑na Date Last Operated:
Farm Name. Creelcsidr.F.arn.� ..... ............ .......... f........... .................. ...................... ........ Count: Craven WARO
O►vner Name: Chad ....................................... S.chn,eider... ......... ......... ............... ........... ... Phone No: 252-244-Q1M.......... ......... ............
....................
Facilitv Contact: ....................................................... .. .................Title:............................................................... Phone No:............................ ... .... .. ...............
.....
f-, • . 41
Mailing Address:.16t1.,P.ughkomm.Rd............................................................................... G:rif DA..N.C............................................................ 2N53!U ..............
Ousite Representative:.................................................................................................... Integrator:Coldsh�rn.Nog.kar.]oas.......................................
Certified Operator: Movin.c.....:....................... schacwex ............................. 0perator Certification Noinher:220..71.............. ............
...
Location of Farm:
.r�t>on.. xt tanl.#xare rxy:.. ..tn. ra.vezt.cautn :. ne... tcr..cs:ossrzrg.lrnt>_nky.. ute.,.tuxn a t_auu. .. ..;art . � Q�:.ta.sko�....... �
ig�n ;.T;urn;xagt t .and.bacb .lcfx.san .N R.14S�...Farm.path ansi.sigrr ;un;ralxhi;ap ... miles .:::::::::::::::......:::::::::::::::::::::
Latitude ©� ©° ®44 Longitude ©•
Swine Capacity Population
® Wean to Feeder
3200
❑ Feeder to mts
Farrow to Wean
[3 Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
p Boars
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ ayer it ❑ airy
p Non -Layer ❑Non- alry
❑ tier
Total Design Capacity 3,
Total SSLW 96,00'0
Number of Lagoons
0 u sur ace
Drains
Present p
agoon rea JE3 Spray re rra
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps
F[_]'1To_Liquid Waste
Ma.nagement
System
Discharacs & Stream Impacts
1, is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ❑ No
Discharl_e originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spay Field p Otlier"
a. if discharge is observed. was the Conve►•ance mail -made? ❑.:yens ❑ No
b- 1�_dischar­c is 4served. did it reich../Vater of -the State:' (II'ves, notify i)WO) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed: u°hat is the estitizated flow in ­al/min?
d. Does dischar,,c bypass a la�,00n sv'stenl? (If �,es. Potif%, DWQ) ; ❑ Ves p No
2- Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? []Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potenti$Overse imp .ts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Ca Yes ❑ No
Waste CoIlectit) n & Treatrnetlt
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ S*wa �:: ❑ Yes []No
Strucnlre 1 Structure 2 Structure Structure 11 Structure 5 ". Structure b
Identifier: •4t e;
........................................... ........ ;y : ............................ . ............................ .........- :..............................
Freeboard (inches): ..................................
S. Are there any immediate threats io the integrity of any of tlse structures observed? 4ie1 trees. severe erosion, ❑Yes p No
seepage, etc.}
31?3/99 r .. ,e - ti,; Con inued on back
.:.

Facility Number: 25-50 hate :J 111, 1pection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? []Yes p No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
T Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes []No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes p No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes p No
WHAe Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes p No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes []No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes []No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? (3 Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pend ed for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes p No
15- Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes p No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? p Yes p No
Renuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certifil'Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists. design, maps, etc.) . ,'%=
❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, Freeboard, waste analysis &: soil sample reports)
❑ Yes p No
20. Is, ilif not in cam liance with an applicable setback criteria i nef% ct at the time of design?
��•. Y P Y PP g
❑ Yes ❑ No
21. Di e facility �,il to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes ❑ Na
y-
22. l`a n^notify. regional r) Q ofemergency situations as required by General Permit?
{i 'Scharge, freeboard problems, over application3--
[Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with 6-site representative?
p Yes ❑ No
.. Ok
24. Does facility require a follow-up iiisit by same agency? rt #°' ..
p Yes p No
25. Were any additioba} problems noted which cause nonl6pliaftce of the Certified AWMP? i
❑ Yes ❑ No
[lraFlCtell'Cie5•�°ere'xtvted:during.this isit' V'oi'ivill'receive na further''
................ ................
�sPvnidence NOW this:Visit:.................. .
Commeals (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or -any recommendations nr any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use 6ilgionaf pages as necessary):
dequate.structure integrity.
Adequate allowableI- nayirnum lagoon level.
Storm impact to lagoon: structure inundated., Aood water brig inated from Swift Creek in Neuse Basin. Lagoon
overtopped by Swift Creek. Lagoon was lowered to 19 inches. The pump apparently scoured a small hole in
back
corner-, but it is not,a threat. .
Fields are saturat 'but not ponded. _
Current laoon le l: 19
ill neecLIo.talk with -farm representative on condition of irrigation equipment.
Reviewer/Inspect Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Rev iewer/InspectoO Ognature: Dafc:

AjArkdd t0-y-55
EMERGENCY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
Drafted September 24, 1999
Facility # - 50
Date: q• 2-1 -It 'r
Time: 7:�a
Waste Structures:
On -site Representative: Contact#
Inspector/Reviewer:
DLQJDam Safety Rep.:•�h �•�
1, Structure Integrity (circle one):
Immediate Threat Potential Threat dequat Other
Comments(does structure need repair/extent of damage, etc.):
2. Allowable maximum lagoon level (circle):
Structure failed and is inoperable .
Immediate Threat - empty immediately
Immediate/Potential - maximum operating level
(inches from top of dike - must be initialed by DLO/Dam Safety rep.)
(Adequate - may operate at normal levels
3. Storm impact to lagoon (circle applicable category):
Structu
tion related to length of time submerged, }
Flood waters saturated outside wall
Estimated distance in inches (ie/36 inches from top):
Structure topped over
(was top of dike cut, etc.)
Flood water on from 5-"ft Cum (name of creek, river, etc.)
Circle Basin: Neuse Tar White Oak Roanoke Chowan
4. Date and explanation of remedial action taken after storm: L
t4rL /e.A R S V' n_j' �j,� 6r. JC (,y/.tpr 7> r'- 15 A94 A 4,.4.

Other Parts of Waste Management System:
Comments (lift station, collection boxes, destroyed houses, etc.)
Waste Application System:
1. Irrigation/application system - comments, assistance needed, etc.:
2. System is (circle): Inoperable/destroyed Operable but limited Operable
3. For inoperable systems (circle):
Lost supply lines Lost hardware (reels, pivots, etc.) Lost pump No power sources
Other:
4. What is needed to repair system and length of time needed to bring back on-line?
5. Would a generator fix situation?
6. Is pump & haul equipment available?
Land Application Sites:
1. Is field(s) currently flooded and if yes, what percentage of field(s) flooded?
Fields�areaturated b�not
3. Are receiving crops available? Yes No
If answered no, estimated time before next crop planted
4. Fields adequate to receive waste
5. Comments - remedial action taken after storm which may have affected spray fields:
6. Are alternative sites or third party land immediately available?

Record Keeping:
1. Records were destroyed and in need of reconstruction
2, Records partially complete
3. Records available and complete
4. Date and PAN of last waste analysis
Structure 1: 2: 3: 4. 5:
5. Last lagoon level readings: 1 2 3 4 5 Rainfall Received
Just prior to August 1:
Just prior to August 29:
Just prior to Sept. 15
Immediately after 9115
Current level I'l
6. Documented volumes pumped from waste structure since Hurricane Floyd:
7. Current animal populations:
Mortality Losses:
1. Number of animals lost:
2. Disposal method used:
3. Does facility lack a means of disposal?
Other comments; unanswered questions, etc.:
i¢�144jec an C�..�j4 0n o
Use back of sheet for additional comments, sketches, etc.

W [] Division of Soif amid' -Water Conservation -Operation ReYiew A
_
-' [] Division of Soil and: W afar.; Catnse�ation =;Cam lianeef Ins ` ectian s. � = F=: �aa
wt.. G:
..... ...... ]P
Coin u Dr►isron of Water. ual� :=. ante Ins ciYat :
-
_ -. w -
fix: r�Pn ��~
� Older Agency
- O ratzort-Re��ew
10 Routine Q Complaint Q Follo -ue of Dl'VQ inspection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review ❑ Other
Facility NumberDate of Inspection
Time of Inspection 7: 3 1 ?A hr. (hh:mm)
13 Permitted a Certified [] Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 3 Not U erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ......... CE ,. ...... ................................................................... County:..... - 1!`?-....................................... ......
Owner Name: ..........�."1Q
Facility Contact:
G +r -i .-,......:. Phone No. _2 2.'..24 V—t7d`7�5
..... Title:
Phone No:
flailing Address: A.. ��v,, ��.... �?'��ati ...........•........../V ...... ....................... .� S5 e?.
p �.. .......,....................................__.... ....... ...................
Onsite Representative: {.......`.r+h� �.......c re''�- P'.?{�r*:r........ Integrator:....... .f..............................................................
Certified Operator: ... ldz__ b n �• 6e_A1, E. „• Operator Certification Number:,..,, ,7, ,,..,,,..,,
...................................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude * & .. Longitude •
Design Current
Swine Canacifv Ponulation
Wean to Feeder
5-2—
Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts i
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Ca 'acity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
`Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area . _
•Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Llanagement System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ElLagoon ElSpray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance than -made?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If ycs, notily DWQ)
c- If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galltnin?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system' (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): .......... ?..................-............... ............... ....... ....... ......... ........
❑ Yes J�jNo
❑ Yes 151 No
❑ Yes 0 No
n le"
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes El No
❑ Yes 91 No
❑ Yes lErNo
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes ® No
Continued on hack

Facility Number: 2- — Sd Dalto (of' Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7_ Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9- Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
[:]Yes .9 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes Y�No
❑ Yes ® No
E.7c r 'fpa
13- Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes JZ No
14, a) Docs the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ,e- ---A, �j_ J/h:� 07,• ❑ Yes 0 No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination'snrr ey �r} ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? t:irlj�t �►�'�"`� ❑ Yes 21 No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
❑ Yes
a No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[4 No
Required Records & Documents
IT
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
R No
19,
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20-
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
RNo
21,
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
© No
23.
Did Revieweer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
[.No
0; �Cio yi laficjns:oir deficiencies were noted. diWit?g this;visit' - ybit ivill•rebO*Oe Ino l_utther.; ;
- ,cnrrespandertce. ah"C this �iisiit.
Comments.{refer; to:question'.#}:;;Explajp any YES answers andlor:any recnmtnendatia.o6s. ar any'Dther: comments: .:m . `::I
><Jse.drawings of faeility to > etter explain situations. {use additivnal`pages as necessary)
14ecca+x�s Gurrci 1pe�Ie r rt.d3 cw . ifs f� P - d4AJ, Ef - e 2-- 7q r) Icl4 - 1, 231 ik-$
IA1lyf � �1-..i.�j s� s ! � 1 `I Y , -.�r'� � , S IY'9 ��! �►rra�ys'S - �fw��' ��179
C�a _i
-A,r
Reviewerllnspector Name J
Reviewer/Inspector signature:
e-s lua -e_ lal"tel "'. 't
0--., X,�d� t
�'.-Y
s�
Date: S- ! 4-- 111
3123199

Facility Number: Z 5 — sd Dote of 1 Etspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes 14 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes RNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentitemporary cover? ❑ Yes No
Aqd
rOona . Comments and/or' Drawings: F�::= - _ _
3/23/99

State of North Carolina -
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
January 8, 1999
Mr. Melvin C. Schneider
Creekside Farms
160 Pughtown Road
Grifton, North Carolina 28534
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Creekside Farms
Facility No. #25-50
Craven County
Dear Mr. Schneider:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection (as it is
viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facility by the Division of Water
Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the
State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being
kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any
questions, please contact me at 919/946-6481, ext. 318 or your Technical Specialist.
Sincerely,
��,
677- Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Cc: LBH files
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Adlon Employer

0 Complaint 0 Hojiow-up of tuwV inspection p
Facility Number
p Registered ■ Certified 0 Applied for Permit p Permitted
-up of tlawt. review 0 utner
Dale of Inspection
Time of Inspection 832 24 hr. (hh:mm)
in Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Creekside_.F.arrns......................................... ................................................ County: Craven WARD
Owner Name: Cbad....................................... S luwjder•••.-••-•••.•••..••••-•................•••.•..._ Phone No: 752-24.4-Q05.......... ............... -....... ••.... ..................
.
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address:161I.Puglllomix.Rd...............................••..•••••....................................... Griftoix-N.0 ............................................................ 2$S.iil..............
Onsite Representative: Cbaul.-Schneider Gr-orge.l!tUuts....................................... Integrator: GaI&burn.Hog.Fat:MS.......................................
Certified Operator:N.I.elxin.G ............................. Schaeider......... ............................... Operator Certification Number:224..72........ .....................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©. ©� ®u Longitude © ■ ©4 ©44
,.._
estgu_= �� -
- .. -
..�€: ..... ....:..s:::,=::.x:'�. .. ,,, .... '... Wes'`• _ �.. ;;.:: -;s..
z Swine. x =K . - Ca act Po uEation_-t; Pati_ltry, _ .M, - -;Ca achy: Po emulation --=Cattle`; _ - �Ca aci : Population
l
®Wean to k ceder
p Peeder to iris
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to reeder
p Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
p Boars
�agoansN HoldingPondiLL
lJ
❑Layer
p airy
`.
❑N On -Layer
:`;
❑ on- airy
E] Other
..:.,......z .... -
..ww „ • - "._ : _ e --
:Total I}esi Ca aci µ3,20
_.._......... a
Total,
--
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon p Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c" If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in ealimin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notifi, DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
nla
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
0 Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ® No
Continued on hack

[ 1
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures {Laloons.HoldinPonds. Flush Pits, etch
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
........ -.................. ..........................................•- -----
Freeboard(ft):.............. .23............. ..................................... ................................. .---------
1 U. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13, Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
© Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
15, Crop type .... Sip U.Grain.4LW1.eat...,arkX,----•--•-----.............................................
]VIi]o, �als)
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated m the nimal Waste Management Plan (A WMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did ReviewerlInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
_ o-v ri ops-w` - e irieiities,wer-a -]tibte ar, qg, this visit.-. You will -repetye na • fat -their er
.:. correspanilerice ab,64t ithis:,isii: - .. - . :.. ........ . - . - .. .. .: .
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
p Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes N No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
❑ Yes R Na
❑ Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name k-1 n 5 Htit dlson
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ��� Date: �� �b _ 5'

❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated
Farm Name: Cs' �'Q .....-.
_ ...... ....._•-•-----. .i..._.....� _ _ —...._ .�..._ .... .....
Land Owner Dame: � $c1.ne� de,
�, �---•--.. ---.................. .._....... ........
Facility Conctact:..... .... ....._ �.... Sck� t .................... --•--- Title:
Mailing Address: ........ LG �..... `� k `dot"''^_ lel...... � .....
----- _..... _._....
Onsite Representative: t 4a
.... �............. �........`. . �....... _................ .........
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
County. f�r -rC.+'1
Phone No: ..._..zq y.....V,0..6
.
............ ....... — Phone No:
0
Integrator: .... I�L�.. !!!�........
- __...._ .
Operator Certification Number:
Latitude • 6 0 u Longitude ' i 0 u
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
gym,»
rrent
Aa
Dear n:.... Current.....: Dear rf'' `Current :.Dear n.µ d.0
......g....�-.w g...-
Pout - • .. M ,::: ..Cattle.`M °.. ;
Ca acr Pa ulatronnw. -,' .....: 5' Ca acttV --p ulatton...:.. :..:.:::.:.... "'Ca aci Pa nulstion
® Wean to Feeder 3 2 DO i 2� c7 b ° ❑ La er J . ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish Non -Layer ❑Non -Da'
w
Fa
».
w to Wean _ »•� ^-- Farrow ....�:
-
Y
Farrow Feeder TQt1 DeSi Ii' aCi
P • ty u -.;
ra w.
a
Farrow o Finish t
......:...
SL
Other....,.............s..a:«a�en+.^-::......-.........:.:..:. ....:.A.,...ss,sra �x:•ce,--.- .....-...-^^ .........,«'.�.;i«.«..:..�
Subsurface Drains Present
Um er�of�La oons,'1�Hdldiit 'Ponds; ❑
g g..
ny
271
iP
Lagoon Are _: Spray Fie e
Gerkeral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes 'pfNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 10 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gat/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ} ❑Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes JKNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge:? ❑ Yes D6No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes 10 No
maintenance/improvement?
4134197 Conrirrrred on back

1
Facility Number:
6. Is Facility not in compliance with any applicable Setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
S. Are there lagoons or Storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Pondsl
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard {ft): Structure i Structure'_ Stricture 3 Structure 4
........ !�......................... I. ................. ........ ... ......................... ----....... .........
❑ Yes UtNo
MYes ❑ No
❑ Yes )4No
❑ Yes OdNo
Structure ; Structure 6
10.
is seepaoe observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
XNo
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
❑ Yes
ONo
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
f(No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify D%.%rQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
14 No
Waste
Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application'?
❑ Yes
$ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
10.
.j;.r ....t
Croptype ..............................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
*Yes
0 No
17,
Does the facility have a Iack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
14Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
,XNo
21.
Did Review•erAnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
$ No
For Certified Facilities OnIr°
22,
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
El Yes
XNo
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
$ No
Cnttumerts. (cefer.tu. question #) 'Explaiw anyYE.S .answers:ardlnr:any: recvinmeit#a#iutis`or ally .otlier'iittieniLs:`
Use drawers of facility to better. ex lain situations. use addititiinal a es as necessary
"` "
.............
g
......::.:::::::.:
r5.�s d 'q , one- u; II �-kw, 4_+ 4.
f r r� 3n It �+t'}_ Itf y j{1 l■ I
it
OM (044-&.�tt } ri TL7 ,N Erg t1��-� }o �`�' p�-+rF.
Reviewer/Inspector Name n ......
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc: Divisii+rr of Critter Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessinerrl U►ril 4/30/97