250047_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH 1 H UAHUL1NA
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS.
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
250047
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS250047
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date!
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County:
Craven Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
02/02/2017 EntryTime: 11:30 am Exit Time: 1:15 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Sammy Lane Farm
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner:
Sammy Lane
Phone:
919-527-1239
Mailing Address:
10705 Hwy 55 W
Dover NC 285268935
Physical Address:
500 Jimmy Smith Rd
Dover NC 28526
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator:
J C Howard Farms
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35` 19' D4" Longitude:
77° 21' 03"
located at the end of Jimmy Smith Rd. and 2.5 miles West of Fort Barnwell.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William S Lane
Operator Certification Number: 16332
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Sammy Lane
Phone:
On -site representative Sammy Lane
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Sludge Survey 7-6-16 Thick-2A5'
LTZ-3.75'
Pump intake-4.8'
Calibration complete 8-24-16 wl 14.2 GPM
Soil Test 10-11-16 wl highest lime 0 tons
Cu & Zn values wAn range
Waste Analysis 10-11-16 60
6-24-16 .32
2-26-16 1.22
Crop yield complete
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
15}Maintain sprayfield for weeds
page: 1

Permit:
AWS250047
Owner- Facility:
Sammy Lane
Facility Number:
250047
Inspection Date:
02/02/17
Inpsection Type.
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,500 1.323
Total Design Capacity: 1.500
Total SSLW: 202,500
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Data Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 20.00 30.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility : Sammy Lane Facility Number: 250047
Inspection Date: 02/02/17 lnppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na He
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
[]
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na He
4, Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any 'immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.]?
B. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
[]
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 tbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
[]
page: 3

Permit: AWS250047 Owner- Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number: 250047
Inspection Date: 02/02/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1 Smalf Grain Overseed
Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Craven
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site deed improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yej N9, Na Le
19. Did the facility fail to Have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑M
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS250047 Owner -Facility : Sammy Lane Facility Number: 250047
Inspection Date: 02/02117 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ 0
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
25. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ M
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na We
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation D Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 49 Routine Q Complaint D Follow-up Q Referral p Emergency Q Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: -j7- Arrival Time: o Departure Time: County:1� Region: U' `D
Farm Name: S::,+m(V�A_ V�a -�- ��"' Owner Email:
Owner Name: "rnifo' ��_ Phone:
Mailing Address: 0Q S 5 Dauer, i JC A S4 C
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: S Yri Title:
Onsite Representative: shy" (VLF
Certified Operator; G r+►— C n tk-2-
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm;
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: (& raI:,Ic.
Certification Number: 1� 3
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Pouttry Capacity Pop.
Wean to FinishFLa er
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
15� pi3
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Design Current
D . P..oult . Ca aci P,o
Layers
D Cow
Non -Daily
Farrow to Finish
Beef Stocker
t'iilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other Turke Poults
Other Other
Dischar es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed frorn any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at; ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes L34" ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [� o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

Facili Number: IDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
/
4, is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
YT40
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): -
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
Poo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[] Yes
CNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement.
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift [] Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s).
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes .0 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes gN
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ❑Xo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes INNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage &Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Io
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
54o
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
QXo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
[] Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
D<o
❑ N
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facifi Number: -r7 IDate of Inspection: ] - $
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [�MA NA ❑ NE
_Z5. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [5 es No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
[3/Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon I
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
[] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA O-NE'
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes El"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes PI -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:_
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 0,14o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer:to:question #)::Explain4ny.YES'ans*ers and/or any'additional recamrnendatious:or,any Mher:rammei ts..:
: r.. .:,
Use drawings of facility ta.better.explain•situations (use.additional pages as.necessary) --,:: =� = ...:'':: :w ^=�n h
Sl��'�-e- S►�� lb- 2-6- 15
C rc>
Sol --I C -_�—
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
1. )1
"1-D3
L� 6 7
.4-cA, — 5, r
Phone: '1 y� r _�q V 7
Date: 0— / I ` /3
21412014

M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility !Number:
25DO47
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS250047
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County:
Craven Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
12/02/2014 Entry Time: 11:00 am Exit Time: 12:30 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Sammy Lane Farm
Owner Email:
eae200&mbargmaiI-rA
Owner:
Sammy Lane
Phone:
919-527-1239
Mailing Address:
10705 Hwy 55 W
Dover NC 285268935
Physical Address:
500 Jimmy Smith Rd
Dover NC 28526
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator:
J C Howard Farms
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35° 19' 04" Longitude:
77' 21' 03"
located at the end of
Jimmy Smith Rd. and 2.5 miles West of Fort Barnwell.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William S Lane Operator Certification Number: 16332
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Sammy Lane Phone:
On -site representative Sammy Lane Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
inspection Summary:
Calibration complete 8-27-14
Waste Analysis 6-12-14 1.59
8-19-14 .80
Crop yield complete
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
Sludge Survey 11-16-13 Thick-3.06'
LTZ-4.47'
Pump intake-4'
Soil Test due 2016
page: 1

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility : Sammy Lane Facility Number: 250047
Inspection Date: 12/02/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,500 1,052
Total Design Capacity: 1,500
Total SSLW: 202,500
Waste Structures Observed
Disignated
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 20.0 TF
42.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS250G47 Owner - Facility : Sammy Lane Facility Number: 250047
Inspection Date: 12102/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
[]
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10°/c/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility : Sammy Lane Facility Number: 250047
Inspection pate: 12/02/14 Inpsection Type:, Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Craven
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
■ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 []
❑
15. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Wl1P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit. AWS250047 Owner - Facility : Sammy Lane Facility Number: 250047
Inspection Date: 12/02/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na He
Crop yields?
[]
120 Minute inspections?
❑
MDnWy and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ N
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
[]
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
■ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
1:10
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
[]
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑
❑
page: 5

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 250047 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250047 „ El Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comollance Inspection - Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine ___ County: Craven Region: Washinaton
Date of Visit: 0311212013 Entry Time: 11:50 AM Exit Time: 12;50 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Sammy Lane Farm Owner Email: gae20¢Q_embargmail.
Owner: Sammy Lane Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 10705 Hwv 551N ❑oy@r NC 285268935
Physical Address: 500 Jimmy Smith Rd Doyer_NQ 28526,,,
Facility Status: 0 Compliant Not Compliant Integrator: tjeuhgff Far
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'19'04" Longitude: 77°21'03"
located at the end of Jimmy Smith Rd. and 2.5 miles West of Fort Barnwell.
Question Areas:
© Dischrge & stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William S Lane Operator Certification Number: 16332
Secondary DIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Sammy Lane Phone:
On -site representative Sammy Lane Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250047 Owner • Facility: Sammy Lane
Facility Number: 250047
. Inspection Date: 0311212013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Sludge Survey 12-18-12 Thick-2.81'
LTZ-5.13'
Pump intake-3.5' ) Need to get current pump intake measurement
Calibration 7-15-12
Soil Test 4-3-12 wl highest lime 0 tons
Cu & Zn values Min range
Waste Analysis 12-10-12 2.24
7-21-12 .25
Crop yield complete - need dates of cuttings for Bermuda
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility; Sammy Lane
Facility Number: 250047
Inspection Date: 03/12/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 11500 0
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Total Design Capacity: 1,500
Total SSLW: 202,500
Designed Observed
Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
koon 1 20.00 28.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number: 250047
.Inspection pate: 0311212013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field Q
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
6. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
Cl
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate fox below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

. Permit: AWS250047 Owner -Facility: Sammy Lane
Inspection Date: 03/12/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number. 250047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10lbs.?
Cl
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare sail?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Nay)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Craven
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
m
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility: Sammy Lane
. Inspection Date: 0311212013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number : 250047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
Q
Lease Agreements?
Q
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AW5250047 Owner - Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number: 250047
. Inspection bate: 03/1212013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? {i.e., discharge, Cl ■ Cl ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
It yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewbrispection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

s
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 250047 Facility Status: Actiyg„ _ Permit: AW,a250047 Q Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance In5pection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routil3e County: Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 04/03/2012 Entry Time: 12:00 PM _ Exit Time: 01:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Sammy Lane Farm Owner Email: eae2000_embargma0.
Owner: Sammy Lane _ Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 10705 HW 55 W Dover NC 285268935
Physical Address: 500 JimmySmith Dover NC 2852,E
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Neuhgff,Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°19'04" Longitude: 77"21'03"
located at the end of Jimmy Smith Rd, and 2.5 miles West of Fort Barnwell.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William S Lane Operator Certification Number: 16332
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Sammy Lane Phone:
On -site representative Sammy Lane Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stiltey Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility. Sammy Lane
Inspection Date: 04/03/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis 3-23-12 2.6
11-17-11 1.0
9-13-11 .65
4-18-11 1.8
Soil Test 11-18-11 w1 highest lime 0 tons
Cu & Zn values Win range
Sludge Survey 12-10-11 Thick-3.08'
LTZ-4.64'
Pump intake-3.5'
Calibration due 2012 - get GPM
Rainfall & Freeboard complete & correspond wt irrigation
Crap yield complete - good wheat stand
Facility Number: 250047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 2

L
Permit: AWS250047 owner - Facility: Sammy Lane
Inspection date: 04/0312012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 250047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
© Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,500 1,374
Total Design Capacity: 1,500
Total SSLW: 202,500
Waste Structures
Designed observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
goon 7 20.00 29.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number: 250047
Inspection Date: 04/03/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 110110
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 00011
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
Cl
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (f.e./large trees, severe
Cl ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altemat ives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number: 250047
Inspection Date: 04/03/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Vssit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN a 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Craven
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
000
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
ONO
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
ONO
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have aft components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number. 250D47
inspection Date: 04/03/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? Q
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? DMOD
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Cl
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. aid the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■
❑
❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non-oompliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit. AWS250047 Owner - Facility: Sammy Lane
Inspection Date: 04/03/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250047
Reason for Visit; Routine
Records and Documents Yes
No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues Yes
No
NA
NE
M Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
❑
❑
■
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑
Cl
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the fad Iity?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon I Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 001111
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency �
Facility Number : 250047 El
Facility Status: Active _ Permit: AWS250047 , Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Vlsit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: G4111/2Q11 Entry Time:12:00 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: SaamMy Lane Farm Owner Email: Pae2000_embargmail.
Owner: ,Sammy Lane Phone: - -
Mailing Address: 10705 Hwy 55 W Dover NC 285268935
Physical Address: 50_Jimmy Smith Rd Dover NC 28526
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Neuhoff Farms
Location of Faun: Latitude: 35'19'04" Longitude: 77°21'03"
located at the end of Jimmy Smith Rd. and 2.5 miles West of Fort Barnwell
Question Areas:
© Discharges & stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William S Lane
Operator Certification Number: 16332
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Chase Mackey
Phone:
On -site representative Sammy Lane
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary InspectMsj:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number : 250047
Inspection Date: 04/11/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CDC and Permit in records
Waste Analysis 11-8-10 1.0
6-28-10 1 A
Calibration complete 10-12-10 w176% uniformity) get GPM for 2012
Soil Test 7-1-10 with highest lime .5 tons
Cu and Zn values within range
Crop yield complete
Freeboard and Rainfall complete and correspond with irrigation
Sludge Survey 11-9-10 Thick-1.32'
LTZ-5.64'
Pump intake-'
'No underground draintile
`Need to get waste analysis for March irrigation
Small grain stand good
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility: Sammy Lane
Inspection Date: 0411112011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,500 1,250
Total Design Capacity: 1,500
Total SSLW: 202,500
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon 1 20,00 28.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number: 250047
Inspection date: 04/11/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 1101111
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? {if yes, notify DWQ} ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? {if yes, notify DWQ}
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
You
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0011
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
fi. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [Hot applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks andlor wet stacks]
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250047 owner - Facility: Sammy Lane
Inspection Bate: 04/11/2011 Inspectlon Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Ap licp ation
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda
Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Craven
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Cl ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number: 250047
Inspection Date: 04/11/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
1f Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? Cl ■ Cl ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
Q
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
Q
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
Q
Rainfall?
Q
Stocking?
Q
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

PennM AWS250047 Owner - Facility; Sammy Lane Facility Number. 25OD47
Inspection Date: 04/1112011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLATY certification?
... __ __
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fait to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

Type of Visit 4D Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason far Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ja-1 O Arrival Time. 1M. Departure'Time: County: r*.L a Region: 1
Farm Name: Layw_ , Owner Email:
Owner Name: �w"M1t`-�""�� Phone:
Mailing Address: _ la -I Lz S5 L �av^Cr a� 5a
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: c 'rASAL Oe s,� Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Sa�„� 4QV'Q_' _ _ Integrator:o,
Certified Operator- ``�' Lall_� Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number;
Location of Farm: Latitude: ='
='
="
Longitude: 0 ° = i = «
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Design Gurrent
MePoultry Capacity Population
Cattle
Design
Capacity
Current
Population
❑ Weanto Finish
❑ L eer
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Non -Layer I
❑ Dairy Calf
93 Feeder to Finish 5 DD ktA ASp
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Soars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ I
❑ Turkey Poults
JE1 Other
Number of Structures:
Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes RNv ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
El No
❑ NA
❑ NE
El Yes
fnNoo
El NA
❑NE
El!_,�No Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: . S
Date of Inspection iF '0 1Q
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes [J'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes L]'l�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ED.a ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement`?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [tea ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement'? �
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes 2 []NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 14 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acc ptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Area
5 z
12. Crop types) S
13. Soil type(s) C.f C1.4�� t
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP`?
El Yes
,.,
L_ o ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
MYes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
F;—ido ❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application`?
❑ Yes
Ej/o NA
[INE
I & Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El
L.J.�o LJ NA
❑ NE
Comments refer. to question # :. Ex lain any YES answers and/or any:recuintnendations or.rin .other,commen`ts.': '" . ;,• -
( �1 ) p y,
?
Use drawrings of facility,to.better explain situations.,(use additional pages as.n. ssary)•...
� &�
GO Ll� � ��1r
v1Awr�
►_ v vYdS Q-L6-)0
r:.. R W.�^
Reviewer/Inspector Name ;;;; ,s::- "° y Phone: �{ "' c% 7 7
►+
Reviewerllnspector Signature: Date: I 1= i a —
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: ;� �{Tj Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Q2/Nc ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check ❑ Yes aNZo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
04
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections0
Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
ZNA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
El NA
El NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
[I Yes
,,.._,fINNo
L2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
YNo
El NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification'?
El Yes
[I No
CJ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Ef NNo
[INA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
�
j�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
[I Yes
❑ No
ElY NA
�/
NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31, Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
El yes
,.
Llmlo"
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
,,.�,,/
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[I NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
�l_'-1'►ti10
CJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
50; l cs� r? — 10 W 5� �, v►�rZ . Jr' �vn 5 �vts� •.
C V of,_>Cs ,Z/; h 'r -. 1�r�
o v-t , r ri art, q 5 ^
7rwce'boc."�'d r,- * 1% J
Page 3 of 3 12128104_

Division of Water Quality
j� Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 250047 _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250047 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Crav n Region: WasbinaIgn
Date of Visit: 02/09/2009 Entry Time:01:00 PM _ Exit Time:
fncident #:
Farm Name: Sammy LaneFarm Owner Email:
Owner: Sammy Lane _
Mailing Address: 10?05 Hwy 55 ►lV Dgver NC 2B52SB935
Physical Address:
iYX6lrf'�
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: INpuhoff Faring
Location of Farm: Latitude: °1 Longitude: 77'21'03"
located at the end of Jimmy Smith Rd. and 2.5 miles West of Fort Barnwell.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William S Lane Operator Certification Number: 16332
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Chase Mackey Phone:
On -site representative Sammy Lane Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250047 Owner -Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number: 250047
Inspection Data: 02/09/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
COC and Permit 2009
Waste Analysis 6-0-08 ZO
8-21-08 1.1
Sludge Survey 12-26-08 Thick-2.06'
LTZ-5.64'
Heed measurement at pump intake pipe
Calibration 6-15-08 with highest lime 0 tons
Soil test 8-22-08 with highest lime 0 tons
Cu and Zn values within range
Freeboard and Rainfall complete and Correspond with irrigation
In process of getting VVUP updated
15) Poor stand or coastal and small grain
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250047 Owner- Facility: Sammy Lane
Inspection Date: 02 O912009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,500 1,500
Total Design Capacity: 1,500
Total SSLW: 202,500
Waste structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
F-9
oon 1 20-00 30.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250047 owner -Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number : 250047
Inspection Date: 02/0912009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
Cl
erosion, seepage, etc.}?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
Cl
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AVVS250047 owner - Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number: 250047
Inspection Date: 02/09/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Qverseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWM P)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site deed improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lad[ of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
Nir
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AVVS250047 owner - Facility: Sammy Lane
Facility Number : 250047
Inspection Date: 0210912009 Inspection type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
n
Other?
❑
21. floes record keeping need improvement?
n
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
Cl
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
❑
IN
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
Cl
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
110
■
Cl
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ 0 ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Q ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page 6

permit: AWS250047 Owner -Facility: Sammy Lane
Facility Number : 250047
Inspection Date: 02/09/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
n+ho.1-- Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Rev iewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewrnspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Cl ■ ❑ ❑
Cl ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ Cl
Page: 7

t
0 Division of Water Quality
j1 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250047 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250047 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: graven — Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 01/28/2008 Entry Time:01 00 PM .. Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Sammy LaneFarm Owner Email:
Owner: 5ammy Lane
Phone:[phone]
Mailing Address: 10705 Hwy 55 W Qgver NC 2852689935
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Neuhoff Farms_
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°19'04" Longitude: 77°21'05"
located at the end of Jimmy Smith Rd. and 2.5 miles West of Fort Barnwell.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William S Lane
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 15332
On -Site Representatives): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Chase Mackey Phone:
On -site representative Sammy Lane Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspectors):
Page 1

Permit: AWS250047 Owner • Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number: 250047
Inspection Date: 01128)2008 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
COC and Permit 2009
Waste Analysis 2-28-07 1.5
`Facility has not updated WUP - Small Grain is still listed with a PAN of 133. The facility never applies more than 50 Ibs PAN on
overseed. Need to update within 90 days.
sing to fax 2007 Sludge survey to DWQ - if LTZ less than 4 feet, the facility needs to submit a Sludge Plan of Action to Raleigh within
60 days.
Next calibration due 2008
Crop yield complete
Sail test 4-2-07 with highest lime 0 tons
Cu and Zn values within range
"Consult with State agronomist for help with Coastal Bermuda Hay field. Sprayfields in very poor shape.
-continue to manage weeds
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility: Sammy Lane
Inspection Date: 0112812008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Facility Number : 250047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,500 700
Total Design Capacity: 1,500
Total SSLW: 202,500
Waste Structures
Type Identifier
Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number,, 250047
Inspection Date: 01/28/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1, is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ n fl
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? {if yes, notify DWQ} ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes,'is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.]?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility: Sammy Lane
Inspection Date: 01/28/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Waste Ap lip cation
PAN?
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Facility Number : 250047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
n
n
❑
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crap and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Small Grain Overseed
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number:
250047
Inspection Date: 01/28/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. floes record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
f=1
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crap yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
F1
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those
❑
■
n
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
[]
❑
■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility: Sammy Lane
Inspection Date: 01/28/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
❑tfter Issues
31, Did the facility fail tv notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32, Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 250047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 7

N Division of Water duality
F1 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency --------------------------
Facility Number: 250047 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250047 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 03/0112007 Entry Time:04,00 PM— Exit Time: Incident 0:
Farm Name: Sammy Lane Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Sammy Lane Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 10705 H ?over NC 285268935
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 19'04" Longitude: 77°21'05"
located at the end of Jimmy Smith Rd. and 2.5 miles West of Fort Barnwell.
Question Areas:
jj Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
JW Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: William S Lane
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16332
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Sammy Lane Phone:
On -site representative Sammy Lane Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250047 Owner- Facility: Sammy Lane
Facility Number: 250047
Inspection Date: 03/0112007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
WUP 5-8-95
COC and Permit 2009
Waste Analysis 2-28-07 1.5
5-18-06 1.9
'Send Sludge Survey Reporting Farm
Sludge Survey complete 9-4-06 thick-2.42 LTZ-3.76 } MAY NOT BE DONE CORRECTLY
Complete 2007 sludge survey to get better LTZ reading
Calibrations complete 9-17-06
Freeboard and Rainfall records complete
Crop yield complete
—No waste analysis for September and October 2006
"No 2006 soil sample
"Need to update WUP, can't have 133 lbs. for'small grain
"Need weed management plan for sprayrields
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250047
Inspection Date: 03/01/2007
Regulated Operations
Owner - Facility: Sammy Lane
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Design Capacity
Facility Number: 250047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,500 1,400
Total Design Capacity: 1,500
Total SSLW: 202,500
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon F
I I 1 20.00 24.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250047 Owner. • Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number : 250047
Inspection Date: 03/01/2007 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream_ Tpacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? D ■ D D
Discharge originated at:
Structure D
Application Field D
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
O
■
n
D
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
D
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
D
■
D
D
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
D
■
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
D
■
❑
D
discharge?
Waste Collection—' 9 Stora e& Treatment
-� .._......._. ---- -- _ - - - ---
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
D
■
D
D
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
D
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
D
■
D
D
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management D
■
D
D
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
D
■
D
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
D
■
D
D
improvement?
Waste ApVl ation
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
D
■
D
D
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
D
■
D
D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? D
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
Pag e: 4

Permit: AWS250047 owner - Facility: Sammy Lane
Facility Number : 250047
Inspection Date: 03/01/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PANT
D
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
D
Total P2O5?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
F1
Outside of acceptable crop window?
[l
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Craven
Soil Type 2
Sail Type 3
Soil Type 4
Sail Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. ❑o the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
D
■
D
D
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
■
D
D
D
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
Q
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
D
■
D
D
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
D
■
D
D
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
D
■
D
D
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
D
■
I,
D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Pag e: 5

Permit: AWS250047 owner - Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number : 250047
Inspection Date: 03M1/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
n
Design?
n
Maps?
❑
Other?
n
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
n
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
it
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after a 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
In
Waste Analysis?
■
Annual soil analysis?
■
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
n
■
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n_
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
In
n
Other kssues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n_
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
n
n
■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number : 250047
Inspection Date: 03/01/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ U
32. Did Rev iewerllnspector,faiI to discuss rev iewlinspection with cn-site representative? ■ n
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

0
Division of Water Quality
j—j Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250047 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250047 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routing County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 02/13/2006. Entry Time:05:30 PM Exit Time: 06:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Sammy Lane Farm _ Owner Email:
Owner: Sammy Lane Phone:[phone]
Mailing Address: 10705 Hwy 55 Vim. Dover NC 285268935
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: '1 " Longitude: 7° 1' "
located at the end of Jimmy Smith Rd. and 2.5 miles West of Fort Barnwell.
Question Areas:
M Discharges 8 Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
jj Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William S Lane Operator Certification Number: 16332
Secondary OiC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
On -site representative Sammy Lane
24 hour contact name Sammy Lane
Title
Phone:
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell Phone:
Inspector Signature: _ Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility; Sammy Lane Facility Number: 250047
Inspection Date: 02/4312006 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
WUP 5-8-95 Need to get plan updated ASAP
Waste Analysis 11-21-05 1.4
7-13-05 2.0
Address woody Vegetation around lagoon, keep lagoon maintained around walls
Sludge survey thick-2.6'
LTZ-4.9'
Next sludge survey due 9-30-2006
Need to start using new IRR-2 form OR both IRR-1 and IRR-2 forms
Page: 2

Permit: AWS25OD47 owner- Facility: Sammy Lane
Inspection Date: 02/1312006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Facility Number. 250047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Closed date Start Date Resigned Freeboard observed Freeboard
agoon 1 20.00 29.DD
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250047 Owner -Facility: Sammy Lane
Facility Number: 25OD47
Inspection Date: 0211312006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
Cl
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
MOD
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
■
❑
Cl
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWD)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
fl
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other
than from a ❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
El
■
❑
D
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
0
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
00011
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250047 Owner -Facility. Sammy Lane
Inspection Date: 02M312006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 250047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10°%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type i
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Craven
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type fi
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
0
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
■
❑
❑
1 & Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
Cl
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250047 Owner -Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number: 25OD47
Inspection Date: 02113/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
n
Maps?
In
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
■
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after a 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
Cl
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
■
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
■
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 6

Permit: AWS250047 Owner - Facility: Sammy Lane
Inspection Date: 02/1312006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
^LL __ I - -..--
Facility Number: 250047
Reason for VIsit: Routine
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewe rllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes • No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
Page: 7

■ Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 250047_ _ Facility Status: Active Permit A)NS250047 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07119I200& Entry Time:099;00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Sammy Lane Farm
Owner Email:
Owner: Sammy Lane _
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 10705 Hwy 55 W
Dover NC 26526
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Neuhoff Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35'19'10" _ - Longitude: 77°21'05"
located at the end of Jimmy Smith Rd. and 2.5 miles West of Fort Barnwell.
Question Areas:
® Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William S Lane
Operator Certification Number. 16332
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Sammy Lane
Phone:
On -site representative Sammy Lane
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: 7-13-05 = 2.0
Soil test 4-25-05
The irrigation records are complete and balanced put, however at a PAN rate that is not included in his W U P
Please contact Craven SWCD & get this Plan updated as soon as possible. Current plan is dated May 1995
Page: 1

01
Permit: AWS250047 Owner -Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number : 250047
Inspection Date: 07/19/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
17 Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,500 1,450
Total Design Capacity: 1,500
Total SSLW: 202.500
Waste Structures
Toe Identifier Closed Date Start Date Desianed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon 1 20.00 :38:00]
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250047 Owner -Facility: Sammy Lane
Facility Number: 250047
Inspection Rate: 07/19/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges ,% Stream Impacts Yes No NA NF
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. bid discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 1101113
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 Cl
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
01111
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑
Yes
M ❑
No NA
❑
NF
Waste Collection_ Storage 8 Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.1 large trees, severe erasion,
❑
M ❑
❑
seepage, etc.}?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑
❑
❑
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks
❑
❑
❑
and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
❑
❑
improvement?
Yes
No NA
NF
Waste ApI210cation
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement?
Cl
0 ❑
❑
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
0
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small
Grain
(Wheat,
Barley, Oats),
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250047 Owner • Facility: Sammy Lane Facility Number: 250047
Inspection Date: 07/19/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Craven
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)?
❑
0 ❑
❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
N ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Cl
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
Yes
■ ❑
No NA
❑
NE
Rprords and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
ti
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of Ilia CAWMP readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
0
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
01111
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ 0
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
a ❑
Cl
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
0
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250047 Owner -Facility: Sammy Lane
Inspection Date: 07/19/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250047
Reason for Visit: Routine
RecinrdZ and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous lass assessment (PLAT) certification?
dtherlssues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those mortality
rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concem? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality
representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32, Did Reviewerllnspector Fail to discuss review✓inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes No NA NF
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Facility Number 25 47 late of Visit_ &24-21104 Time:
NNot Operational a Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .................
Farm Name: SaMMY.Lame.Fam.................... County: Cxaym .............................................. WMQ.......
Owner Name: SAmmy.................................... Ane.............. ............................................... Phone No: 25.E-527. 1239... ..........
Mailing Address: 10.7.05..F WY...55..Wx t---•----•--••----....--•---.... .. . Dax xAc...................... --... U.Sfi.............
FacilityContact: .................................................... ..................... ..... Title: ............ .................................................... Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: Sato.a Laxjc............................................................................... Integrator: lYVullflRFl0.CpaS.-Ug........................... .................
Certified Operator:..Williaitn.5............................. Lang .................................................. Operator Certification Number:lG3.3Z............. ...........
.....
Location of Farm:
located at the end of Jimmy Smith Rd. and 2.5 miles West of Fort Barnwell. A.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 19 lU K Longitude 77 21 OS u
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
1500
1480
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer JEI Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 1,500
Total SSLW 202,500
Number of Lagoons 1
IF
DischarMes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made.'
6. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ....... .............. ..............
Freeboard (inches): 28"
12112103
Continued

Fgcility Number: 25-47
Date of Inspection 1 8-24-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc > 3000
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below [:]Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes N No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes N No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes N No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments {rcfeir.,to qpesifon # :.Ex lain:an .;YES answers and/or any, recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of.:facilityy to better explain situations. (use'additional'pages as ne-cessaiy): Meld Copy [I Final Notes
- -
Records available
Coastal re -sprigged in May
15 - Presently the fields need to be mowed and grass baled. Fields need to dry - Suggest contact Bob Edwards with
CDA and county Ext. for assistance to improve the fields - Need assistance with weed control and coastal growth
Soil analysis 4-13-04 - No lime
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly
Waste Analysis:
5-3-04 =
2.3 lbs
10-16-03
= 0.79 lbs
7-22-03
= 1.3 lbs
5-8-03 =
2.0 lbs
4-26-02
= 2.0 lbs
waiting waste sample results
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B. Hardison
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12112103 Continued

)Facility Number: 25-47 Date of inspection $-24-2004
Reauired Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N N❑
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes
❑ No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
N No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
[3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Irrigation records - complete- When the next waste samples comes in balance the remaining irrigation events.
Need to continue to cut the grass on the dike wall
WQ will work with you for a partial year through next spring to get the field in better shape. I will come back
from time to time to check on conditions of the fields and lagoons.
b Edward, NCDA Agronomist evaluated the fields on September 20, 2004 and ..This is what was
ommended ----- The bermudagrass was sprigged in the above mentioned Feld (Field 2 Craven B soils @ fac.
47) and in two other fields at another facility (25-19) of yours in the Spring of 2004. The soil type in the other
Ids is Goldsboro. Yet, there was a 99% failure in bermudagrass establishment in the fields of both of these
ilities during 2004. Having establishment failures in the same year in two different soil types indicates some
tar other than soil type was probably responsible. I recommend you sprig hybrid bermudagrass again in the
�Iication fields of facilities 25-47 and 25-19 in 2005. Prepare a loose seed bed and sprig as soon as possible after
danger of frost. This will probably be about 15 April 05. With adequate moisture and favorable weather during
I immediately after sprigging, you should have successful establishment.
12112103

c 1n1 ti rF
-DAD' 9�G Michael F. Easiey
Governor
r Wiliam G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
> i
74 Department of Environment and Natural Resources
❑ rC
Alan W. laimek, P.E., Direstar
Division of Water Quality
October 30, 2002
Mr. Sammy Lane
Sammy Lane Farm
10705 Hwy 55 West
Dover, NC 28526
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection S
Request for Information
Facility No. 25-47
Craven County
Dear Mr. Lane:
On September 17, 2002, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the referenced facility. The
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) was not readily available for review at this facility. Therefore, the
records and documents of the CAWMP could not be reviewed during the inspection.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 21-1.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated property under the
direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or
runoff.
You are requested within 10 days of receipt of this letter to send a copy of your last two waste analysis reports, the last soil
analysis report, freeboard level records and complete copies of your IRR-1 and IRR 2 forms for the last receiving crop and
current receiving crop. Once this infonriation is received in the Washington Regional Office, it will be reviewed and the
Compliance inspection completed. If this inhDrmation is not received within 10 days by the Washin n Regional
Office. this facilit►► will be in violation of its General Permit and subiect to an avnroRriate enforcement action. The
requested information should be mailed to the following address:
Daphne B. Cullom
Division of Water Duality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the attached
inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon as
possible.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. Should you have further questions or comments regarding this
inspection, do not hesitate to [:all me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
U6CZ � - C"�
--��
Dap ne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
CC: WaO&Animal Compliance
DBC files
943 Washington Square Mad Washington, NC 27889 252-948-6481 (Telephone) 252-946M15 (Fax)

Type of Visit g Compliance Inspection p Operation Review ❑ Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ® Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other p Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 9lI7R002 Time: Z:OG pnn
p Not Operational p Below Thresbo.10
■ Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....... -••••---•--•••••
Farm Name: Sammy Lane Farm County: Craven ........ ..................................... ..W..A.RO....
...
Owner Name: Sammy Lane Phone No: 252-527-1239
Mailing Address: 1Q7.0,5HwyM.bmt............... -- ....... - — ._._. _ _ .... _.... Doter..NC......... .......... ........ ................................... . 28.52h.........
FacilityContact: --_-----..... ___ ......-----..................... _Title:... ..................... .... ............................ .. Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Nn.wm.onsitn...... .......... ..-........ ..... ......... Integrator: iCaxiniina.&How.arAEarjum.....---...................
Certified Operator:Vi. niam.S._.........-............_ Lane ............... ........ _._... -............ Operator Certification Number:1633 ... ...........
Location of Farm:
i5cated at the end of Jimmy Smith Rd. and 2.5 miles West of Fort Barnwell. A
N Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude ©■ ®� ®u Longitude ©■ ©®u
.. _ _..
esr urreiatsi ='C es n Curren _ I3estgn Current
FCapaeity Fapulateon�� 2151 ry1 ::capacity P..op lat on'n..yGattle , - ,;Gapatity Population
�.
Y M}Fee
can to ee er p yet ° p Dairy
to tuts � [3 Non -Layer p an -Dairy
`e
Farrow to wean - - ;i: =;
t Other ` �_:, wry -` w .: = ..
Farrow to Feeder r w'-
�.�.;; ,�.._- _ 4�
p Farrow to Finish i :Ttal Design? Csi a�i 15
Gilts;
y 50
3,. z�........ =
-
7 p Soa'rs"'Ha can tea O Pra tk 7-- ; t 0 u ur ace rains resen? s
Holding Ponds I.SoIid Traps;. - '': o Liquid Waste Management System
_ _ _- °r• =Y -
-_ f.,
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes R No
Discharge originated at: © Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. • If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes p No
c, if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes p No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? [3 Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway 0 Yes N No
Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 - Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier: .......�. - .................... _......... .......... ..................... -.... - .........................
Frrrhnnrrllinrhacl• qA

•a`
Facility Number: er: 25-47 J Date of Inspection �t'Tl�iilf_
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
p Yes N No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes p No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
IT Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. 1s facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
® Yes p No
p Yes N No
p Yes p No"
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
13 Yes N No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p No violations or aeliciencies. were noted during this visit, You will receive no further correspondence about this visit
U
at
into
tormwater diversion adjacent to the sprayfield; does not appear to have reached waters of the State; contained
nsite. This appears to have been caused by a clogged line; a decomposed carcass is next to the dog box amongst
ie discharged waste, etc. Discharge not reported to DWQ-WARD.
. Freeboard level adequate.
5. Sprayfields are in need of intensive weed management; Coastal Bermuda sparse in all fields; several areas bare
rith no receiving crop. These areas should not be irrigated. (SEE PAGE 3)
ReviewerllnspectarName Daphne;B:,Ltrllom==en#ered; T=;;..:.:
,�;
ndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

05103101 Conlinued
Facility Number: 25_47 Date of Inspection
Qdor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 13 Yes p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenVWmporary cover? p Yes p No
�� ._.r= �„x�-y.a �r:.ar_; F. i;;� _ - >Sai ..:�:"�=_'. .. .S .fir �rt=rpa'.+yrar•• - -
�:"..s:Y .f �",,+✓;'n+�r� �,yi:l�':.r'�i rP•
: �-�-
acility will'receive=NOV,,"(- ticelbf-violation) for violations+of Certfified%AIuirialti�Vaste Management Plan+ .
_ 'L=3 '• a:Yi s i3: `:- xac: xw�.rA F :wri � ='' 's?S ¢�-�i. ua �, ts� : � .`Y" �'• �-.i � ". �. 9S7
(CAWIVIP `and Genezal Permit_ _k_ a �'=' ,_-, 4
- _ .��'?�'� s8:5 Zs� .: f�•'..='•,V �•=-: S.a�i.:!5'-Fi.«yy._w .-�j2:V w:,Vf7''v^Z 3 i:'•z-iY'.�' `
..' ;�'. - r. �
_^T, r+-• '?" '�';� :r. ;4r::w:=•�]=a '}'E' ,y"`'=.:x.
-r-. `,..•�:et•'t-�::f,.?J�"�-n..>. a-r,'•C:+ t, 't,-i:.f;: t:..-. _:,,- _:.iF-µ't�.Ya.y
L'+r `?�� 4s� ! fit- `S9�M *� •7`,.LJti. T. - - "r �:"
L.!-•T,:_t-
.-�fa�r�ee • _yid:?4I`tj \:'!��.xa. sic; •xa.r�.:`•[:4 `f'.:-K�i.y:..C..s1- t ., .. �S--t^i?-.vim- - ::G�,.,F .� 5�?i..i!;" -T•�
-j�."i :a _.'C •i.•'•' __ _ a6+.�1�': vr. _ �-�.3�� .L �.�.-: �i:�:a �S i%���F yy�w<-- x 3: ar - 1 �y�3•y ' -�.
� �*A:; : ;; ^'•�- .ks, . � 4]-� �S" '- +•:� �5':t" ;L�!x- _•....:� i'e,N.-. ='yt,: `� - Y t w=: � t+.0 ._:.:�,:.: ���' -
-,.sf . n � ?'•sC:.'�=���-:Fi`=5-•r"'",h'•_�, a �'rr^ .�:•r :sa-.'-�:w _�' - ��-`-r - _ , —': _ •-
ti:�,,,��� ,;�: ;ray;. :��. •+. �:..• �;._.�—..;rn,.,=1. �� I. _ y' -"`
'..S';
.�• � -.. � -it la,i -•-�^,;..::'�`. tr �•yF"'.;��e .arc: " . �•• _ .7:,.-rr-
��'�'' �-e:.�,.,7;._}_.�.;r-'?�� '�.'z•___ ��L-.c�:.,w_�ia,rr.?^>? � �`�•'.:� :;s�'?w`:j„ 'fir^ .x�--:�-___�, _ ..a
rr.L=F•:� . {`. 3-%' .� - _ �y.Vi..'-i :: r-Qi:+;-4<Ne: ..0 ;-`+ _ - - i • i,• " ..
':�:� 3'i:� ..:i- tia:R:-:�-'�,.:�x, �:� :�-:_..: n•-.•.-ter=:. �. -w,':. •` - .::" ^.
• ,a_ � =. t; -k"rye . },, � �� _ ti� �' •..�._. �..'s S-�'._.,
'�" :i•`.RFr-r�4�-:.-:�?:'a: }"�=-• _ ••�'7?; a:_�•�.L=,-2';�'r': .X'x..7.�-as�xc�=..��-`. ,.rry y's =� - ;1_^• .r•' .. .. -
�.�-=kti_=S•='"-i T-�J. -- ,.fT+res,_,•r�',�,J . �- �i\Y '-'�.2• . 'lam". _ _ `� n _ lY ... . _
pare. - �.+^-I.. - - _ e - = vF- r • ..
_ -
.. '. F:Y r�:�s. a � w.�.. • ; a-:i=�5:,�� �e�` y'''Y"t r : 1 _ _ _ �r .r - -
- -- -
' -�4. �.�.:� .,w_:Y,SE{:-}:=ter=`• - :ram`_` _ -_- _ _ _ - - - "
As-
:"s. T�.33-��' r x. ris4_ `-�. i. �� - s'�'7'.f {�'�+'zs••: _ z?'tY5>�r.•' .v ' �� - - Y tir+•+ ._
.a' :� -�.-• ,a;.f-�•• •i.,.'r'yi�- _ ....sue_
✓e' - �'X'� �•1 --/+ x - t'{: T' - -.- ��, �. . M, '.=n_ �r .:.._ - ;ate %' E: r,Y• :xY.Y i'x -'i is _ L:T.' _' r-i .'.i+ _ -
.ir�:y': -
_.3-.. - _ �_ .. n '=T;1 ":c-•`i�i. ���i :-:..:i"' ,�p�'"'Yk'Y��!y.'. .5: _F'y.!p- _:f� '*"/r:
•��: _ _ _ '=;,i way --i.:. �_ . - :ti ,- � e±� .- :i..._'•k�.icsY,.t-�- - .. . - - �'� i �i-• - -
- '"..i';' _ ao- _ia:��'`�'--_ — `s[z'a-�.,.`•L� i��tir� a�.a.ri`:=—F'= _ - - �-ti"C. ' _:z.' -__ - _
r- .f' �C.:. .w`_4w.• Sw�17n k'-�� - _ �T�. _,.'-�''- :S' . r _ - - - - _ _ -
- - ., - .. �-.7i -' _ _ .- "x•=tea �1-+F•-'� 2r�-'..W .- - s _ -
=-Syr'-.;=�
" - - - • •�� � Wit': �'a. ¢-.•.,• _ .

[Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation f
for Visit @) Routine 0 Complaint Q Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Bate of Visit: 4rZG1211Q2 Time. Itlt l
Faciliti Number 25 47
f _ Q Not ❑ erational Q Below Threshold
®Permitted ®Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13Registered pate Last Operated orAho%'e Threshold: ............
Farm Name: SA1gA]ny Count►': Crayem.............................................. WAtiA.......
.�' A»..................................................................................
OwnerName: S.atlur nX.........._...................... JAM ......... ..... ..... ..... ........ ........................ Phone No: 7,51:527,- .2 9...............--»---.................------......_
Mailing Address: LtI�ItS SS.West............................................ .... VRxxx.NC......... .......................... .. 2852fr.............
.
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
OnRite Representative: Sato=_LAuc............................................ ........................ ........ Integrator: CAlrttjA;&:H0.1Ward.F.azsq ....... ......... _.........
....
Certified Operator: .W.Bli817u.S........ _.................. L.tuts... _..................................... _... Operator Certification Number:,16JJ.2...._....................
Location of Farm:
oeated at the end of Jimmy Smith Rd. and 2.5 miles West of Fort Barnwell.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ' 19 6 10 w Longitude 77 • 2l i15 u
Design. Current ._ :.' Design: 'Current Design Current
Swine Ca ac' Population Ponttrv. Capacity Population •Cattle �. Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
N Feeder to Finish
1500
1450
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
...... .
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ LaVmn Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding-Pends:I Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
DischaMs & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ®Na
I kcharge originated at. ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ other
a. If discharge is observed, was the cam-e►•ance roan -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is ohsetvcd, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is obsened, what is the eslimated floe• in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon s}'stettt`? {if }'es, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential a&crse impacts to the Waters of the Statc other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure: I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure l Structure 5 Structurc G
Idellttfter:
F reehoard (inches):...............23............... ..................

05103101
Continued
Facility Number. 25-47 Date of Inspection 4/26/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
[I Yes
No
{If any of questions 4-6 was answered yea, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. 13o any of the structures need maintenanceiimprovement?
❑ Yes
® No
& Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelnnprovement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
It. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
N No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need it wettable acre: determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination`?
❑ `fie
❑ No
15. does the receiving crop need improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Ren u i red Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other I'mnit readily available?
❑ Yes
®No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WLTP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19.
Does record Keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis c& soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
0 No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss revicwlwspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Com6ents.(n4&r:t6:.quratron.#):-Eaplaiii, ny answers audlur_ xny rerommendatio>Ys or, nuy,otlrer
as n ❑ Field Copy [I Final Notes
E _ —
;oil test date 3/18/02. Soil test taken 12/01/01 this was for 2001 crop. Lime was applied on 4/25A)2 at rate of 1800 lbslacre. Cu and 7n
ithin guidelines. Remember to take soil test for 2002 and follow lime requirements.
i. Coastal bermuda fields need to be sprayed for weeds.
There were no irrigation events on small grain oversecd for 2001-2002 crop year.
,'4cw waste analysis taken on 4/22/02 no results.
Vlr. Lane used waste analysis dated 6/15/01 for irrigation events dated 8/28/01 on coastal bcmuda instead of waste analysis dated 9/10/01.
caste analysis dated 9/10/01 was .50 lbs/1000 gallons and Mr. Lane feels this is incorrect. No over application.
�.��� •--e — --- - - •yi k; - - - - - -
w
Revrewerl[nspor Name MatiMclthoI
1
r7e.rina,e�l�nan..n+.+r C+�rno+nro• my+a•

05/03(01 Continued
Facility Number: 25-47 Date of inspection 4/26i2002
Odor issues
26. Docs the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
2T Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
reads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land. application -,pray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fans) noted? (ie. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, cte.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentltempora y cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
*Lagoon level is recorded weekly.
*Need to lower lagoon as weather permits and by following guidance from waste plan.
*Records are complete and balanced.
*Waste plan needs to be amended to change PAN rate for small grain overseed from 133 lbs/acre to 100 lbs/acre. Contact tech. spec.
J

Type of Visit ' ® C5mplance inspec ari -Q Op ration Review, 4 1. agaoin i=r`rahiatiari
Reason %r Visit (®-Routine a Camp4yrr p Fotlow up Q Emergency. Notification Q Other ` ❑ Denied Access
Facilit_►' Number '
Date of Visit: 7-7twZ00l Tune: *2 �► Pm Printed on: 7Y39f2QQi
' 25 47
❑ Not Operational 4 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certirwd © Registered Date Last Operated or Abas a Threshold: _....
Farm Name: 5amm_ ..___—lane llxxII. CounO': CmeR.---------- WARD.......
owner Name: S ,p __ ]Ant _— __ _ _ Phone No: 7ia_i77_l2M
Mailing Address: ]42tl5Ha� 55 �e�- » I�x�r 1YC. ._. ..__._.... 2s52k-.-...-.
Facility Contact:.- - .. ..... -- Title:.. ___ .w.». __ » -__ __ _ Phone Na:....... ... ... ..»... .
Onsite Representative: Sat1nU.IAnr_ _. __._ _ _ __ Integrator: ..---_-...„ ....
Certil-eed Operator. B illit m Operator Certir-ication Number.
Location of Farm:
ocated at the end of Jimmy Smith Rd. and 25 miles West of Fort Barnwell. +
T
® Swine ❑ Poultry
❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 '
19 to µ Longitude
�.. Curireat. '::: ; € ................... -€
-.,.......-----
--- ..-............. ....... :::::::::::.............
- ...:: ' Curreat :;:;::::::::::: ;
...• ... ... ... ..
::::iDes Currerit::d .:.
...
:::':':.0
------ - - ----- :-------:::::::....
::, - ,.,,:...
acit :::Po tla6un:===: Poultre_C
::,,,...........-....:.....:.--. .-...........
:,,,:::: :....::::::: :::......
aeitv:: Po trla>,on :;: Cattle:::.::::.::.:::.:C
...::-..
.::.:... . ............:.... ....
achy: Pa atioe
Wean to ]Feeder
❑Layer
;
❑ Dairy
. '
® Feeder to Finish
1500
750
❑Nan -Laver
❑Non -pain
❑ Farrow to Wean
:.-
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
....
FarroN to Finish
:..,
.
::.....::::
-...
TatalPoign C$pacity :=
1.500
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
..
---:- .........
.......
„. . -
'= r3otA SSLW"`.
.:::.: :........ :::::::::::::::. :: .:
202 S00
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge onpuated at ❑ LaGgoon, ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a Iidischarge is obsen ed, was the com eyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b- If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes- notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c- If dischar ee is observed- what is the estimated 11mv in calhuin?
d- Does discharge bypass a lagoon wstem? (if yes, notify- DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IN No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection 8 atment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Struct we 3 Stnreture 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: -
Freeboard (inches): ----------- Z7.... _.-.-•-. __.._.•••••••__..__. _ ••••_-••-_..... _..

>�'actlityNumber: 25-47
Date of Inspection 7-1U-2[iQl Printed on: 7C3712009
L.[I1:Iuj 4Cu
' 5 - Are there my immediate llztrats to the integrity of any of the structures Am rued? O e! trees, =vere ausiM
6- Are �cfes on -site whim are noel properly armed andfoi managed through a waste or
closure p]rm7 (if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the:itiiation poses an -
hnmediate public heatth or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the sh-natnres need mamtapanarJmooprwemart?
8. Does any part of the waste nxanagement system other than waste structures require maintemmoc improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, ganged markers with required mwdmu n and minimum liquid Level
elevation markings?
Waste Applicaflon
10. Are there any buffers that need ?
11- Is there evidence of over applications? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain
❑ Yes ® No
❑Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes X, No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13- Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAVVI 1V)? ❑ Yes ® No
14- a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes D No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) 'lids facdm is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facilit►• fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management. Plan readiN available?
(iel WUP, checklists_ design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need. improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard_ waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a activeb3 certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ref discharge. freeboard problems, over application) - -.
23. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
[j Yes [9, No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes [i No
El Yes 9- No
❑ Yes [ No
Ell Yes IK No
El Yes [K11 No
❑ Yes X, No
❑ Yes X No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
No violations or defier were noted during this vurt. You win receive no further correspond. about th-rs vests.
-traeAraWOMAT, caund am xroatmus: oaeasenua :�a a s: eaeas�r e ; ❑ Field ❑ Final Notes
W .. ,�.� , ��..:::::::::�. :...:.:.....:.:::.v :.... �y
:•-^a�x:� EFE:a: :- ® �: - � ....:::.: E::... �.:.::..:............. ...��a
Soil analysis 11/2000.
Waste analysis 6115/2001, 2-0 Ibs.11000 gak
Irrigation records complete with a nitrogen balance.
Freeboard levels maintained per the General Permit.
General Permit on site with the CAWMP records.
WUP should be amended for small grain with new PAN rate of 50 tbs. or 100 lbs.with appropriate guidance. Current WUP dated 1995 has a
AN rate of 133 for SG with a -97 Ib.defecit This was also noted in the last DSWC Operation Review on 2-15-2001.
Freeboard level should be monitored cleseh due to current level; the end of rowing season is aperoaching and the time of
.-... . � .-- .'.:.,r�. .. -- .-.:, -�.. �+•.ram.__-- a �: d:L:-: _ _— __ __ _ _ __ — ��:�I � _ _ _ _ s;.� —
.. Reviewer/Insr Name --
Reviewerfinspector Signatur<111 n",A, � - CAkQ" „,,— Date: —1 — -j 1 — ❑ i

OSIO3101 ConSvured
Faeffity Number. 25-47 Date of inspection 7-]Q2ila1
Printed on. 71312001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confiaement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond wish no ag=oo?
2T Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of v; ind drift daring land application (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the bmd application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
M Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fats belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s). inoperable shatters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover
32. Do the flush tanks lack- a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover?
year with possible tropical storms & hurricanes and associated Beaty rainfall events.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes to No
❑ Yes ❑ No

Facility Number
Bate of Visit: 121II2QQQ Time: IQ:QQ Printed on. 12/6/2000
25 47
O Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:..............
Farm Name: SSA[lAgy..lT fAti. AIM ....................... County: x l!eA..._........................................... ARO.......
OwnerName: S,an jMy................................... LAJIC ............................................................. Phone NO: 252-527:12.19...........................................................
FacilityContact:.....---•.................................................................•...Title:................................................................ Phone No: ........... ............................... .......
Mailing Address: 1Q7.Q5_RVxy..5,5...WC,S.t................................................. .... VstxxtAc... ............................................................ 29526.............
Onsite Representative: SamHoly..IAAnr.............................................................................. Integrator: Ng.UhOff., •>ilCgaSjAg.
Certified Operator-Willim.................................. LQ.t€t..................... .............................. Operator Certification Number:1(0,3Z .............................
Location of Farm:
located at the end of Jimmy Smith Rd. and 2.5 miles West of Fort Barnwell. +
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Hvrse Latitude 35 ' I9 IQ Longitude 77 • 21 05 u
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IN No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notify ❑WQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................ --- •-------••---•..................... ................................... ...............
..................... .................................... ........ ........ .......... .......
Freeboard (inches); 35
r inn l�.....:.... ,..r .... a....r.

5100 Continued on hack
Facility Number: 25-47 Date of Inspection 1211/Z040 Printed on: 1216/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop" Bermuda Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
❑ Yes
N No
i1Io �iolatians o 'deficiencies-rvete -noted -during this ,visit. ' Yati will-reeeive no furthei r
. - . - corresnundence shout thus:visit.:
Reviewer/Inspector Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall

t Reviewerlinspector Signature: Date: 51001
Facility Number: 25--47 Date of Inspection !Tinted on: 12/6/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Von

y 4) Division of Water Quality
Divisian of Soil and Water_ Conservation:.
Q Other Agency
r
peof Visit (0 Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review ❑ Lagoon Evaluation
ason for Visit i Routine Q Complaint ❑ Follow up p Emergency Notification ❑ Other ❑ Denied Access
Date or visit_ 2-f- Time: ��7;30 Printed on: 7/21/2000
Facility Number
__jQ Not Operational Q Below Threshold
0 Permitted © Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .......................
So ��..FW — County:�Ale 1
Farm Name: ................... ............................................................................---............. ..-....................
...................... ..............................
Owner Name:
Facility- Contact:
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: �+- L"'wl
s!!.'^............................
Certified Operator:
Location'of Farm:
Phone No:
'rifle:.-. ... - .... - ... ---- .. ............--- ------ Phone No:
Integrator: �,� ,
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 9 « Longitude ' 9 __
Design Current
- .-. Canscity pnnsilatinn
i Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
I3*00
1500
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
- Farrow to Finish
RV Gilts
' Boars
rvNp�l1' off DS
HtahHng 11'iuods ISolid Traps"
R Design Current Design. Current
Poultry Ca act population Cattle Capacity -population
❑ Layer ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lag-m Arcs Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed From any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: [I Lagoon El Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flaw in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: .......... .....,,r...................
.........................................................
.................................................. .........-................
Freeboard (inches):
5100
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
El Yes [4No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes RI�No
Structure b
Continued on back

Facility Number: 25 — tf7 Date of Inspection Printed on. 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
9 No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
E4 No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
tof,.over
12. Crop type ■kl,_& �6
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
21 No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
I5. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
S No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
1,9 No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
E9 No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes (3No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes 16 No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes %No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes IS No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ESNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes &No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes M No
IQ 0hlatior s vi 4Fcienrie� wart' 00pd• d06fig -T.- Yoo iflj-eeeeiye iia further ; ;
corres dense: a�aout this visit.......... ...... - .. .
Ci?nmments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments: - : ; ' sy
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as n - - ecessar3')'
A.
IV
Reviewer/Inspector Name �Gr { •� c w ` ' -
:r'' s
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: ] 2 + 5100

Facility Number: ZS — tf7 Date of IEtspection ` f -d3 Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issue's
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge At/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 2�No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes E!�No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
4
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes C N.
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) [j Yes 18 No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes (Z-No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments an orDrawings:
5/00
5/00

I o-go
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
August 4, 1999
Mr. William S. Lane
Sammy Lane Farms
10705 Hwy 55 West
Dover, North Carolina 28526
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Sammy Lane Farms
Facility No. 9 25-47 & 19
Craven County
Dear Mr. Lane:
^nin n.� •�tx
Enclosed please find copies of the Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection s(as it is
viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facilities by the Division of Water
Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read these inspections and keep
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farms are complying with
requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan and/or General Permit; (2) determine whether the waste
utilization plans are based on total or actual wetted acres; (3) the farm operation's waste
management systems are being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage,
erosion, and/or runoff:
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any
questions, please contact me at 252/946-6481, ext. 318 or your Technical Specialist.
Sincerely,
LHardison
Environmental Specialist
Cc: LBH files
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone]i FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

— - - - - - ---- ....-....
Divisioa.of Soil i" Ws#rr Coaserva#toia:- Q ` -- t�on`Re� - :: -- _:- :- :::.::::............ . .
..-- .._ --= •- • •- • • -• ....-.-. - ., gets` ie
- . _ = _ _ - of So' ate;t Copse anon = C m = - - -
Di�iisiat� >) sad W ry o Dance ias son
--..._
p p�
•- ...--... _ -•-- - • •-- -_ _.: -- --- • •- Wes•� ;.. - - - - - - -- - -- - -
-=:� Dirisioa of: ester. n - Com Lance tns P P
- •..-....._......... _ ....... _.-... - -
------- +j eney.:- �. aratwn Rer iew > ::- : r-;::_ ;s ::s::= = ::_:=;:::_:
10 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow --up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 25 19
Date of Inspection 4 $99
_- , , _ Time of Inspection 1415 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted M Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified C Registered JC3 Not ❑ eratu►nal Date Last ❑ erated:
p ..........................
Farm Name: W -Saml aw.E,arm................... County: C.caxen..... -....................................... W.UM---....
O►vner Name: W _Sam....... ....................._..... LalaC.............. .......... .................................. Phone No: 7 1,513-,R 1._.._................._....._....
Facility Contact : ................................ _... _ ... Title: .......................... ...................................... Phone No:..........................
Mailing Address: 1(t;.7.{ Highxt a,�: SS_West..... -------... ........... -•----------...... -.... ----••--•--- Dmrx. NC.........---••-. ------------.............................. --.. 28526.............
Onsite Representative: .5Amtgl.Lwc..CilUGft.1 aUC................................................. Integrator: ItldepCndC>X........................ ....................................
Certified Operator: .12 flfiam.S......... ..................... LAW._....._ .................................... ..... Operator Certification Number. 1633.2,... ....... ...............
Location of Farm:
r,9
.:.......................................................................... ...................... .............. ............ ...........................................
...........::... _________ _______ •_..............
Latitude 3 I 9 ;� 24 j Longitude 77 ■ 21 , 1 50 u �._...
Design Current
Swine CanacitV Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
254
❑ Farrow to Wean
M Farrow to Feeder
738
100
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I❑ Dairy
El Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 738
Total SSLW 385,236
Number of Lagoons '- 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds'/ Solid Traps -`_•K ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System = .
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes M No
Di4charee orimnated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If dischame is ob,en-ed, was the couvevance man-made?
b- If discharge is observed_ did it reach V,`atez' of the State? (If yes. notiii• DWQ)
c_ If di•ebarge is obscn cd. ►What is the estimated flo►a• in gal/min?
d. Does discharge brpa-,s a lagoon si'stem? (Ifyes. notify DV7Q)
2. Is there e%idenee of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there am adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ...................................................old........................................
Freeboard (inches) . ............ _32....... ......... .............2,4'°. ..........
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
�17�149
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes M No
nla
❑ Yes
M No
❑ Yes
® No
[-]Yes
M No
❑ Yes
® No
Structure 6
❑ Yes
M No
Con inued an hack

Facility- Number. 25-19 Date of inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
& Does suv part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need mainicnance/improvement?
I I. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (1-lay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
IS. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard; waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. 1s facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
2 L Did the facility fail to have a activeh, certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notif}, regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Rm iewerllnspector fail to discuss rer7ewliuspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
:: No �i0latioris:or defieienaes were'nioted'during this visit: YdU' w1H1'reeeiVe no further: •
COtreiP6n ence about this Visit.- - _ _ _ '_ . . • . .
Ise auumonatr pages as
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
El Yes NNo
❑ Yes' N No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes N No
zord_s available for review,
wettable determination is not necessary. The waste plan was written inaccordance to the irrigation design.
csently 100 sows onsite and 250 finishing which estimates at 85950SSLW (below the designed of 417.600 SSLW).
re old lagoon is only used as a transfer system. Waste from the houses goes to the new lagoon and at times waste is transfered from
w to the old and back again. Irrigation is from the old lagoon.
ake sure to correct the IRR 2 records on the February irrigation events. The applied nitrogen (on the Rye cover crop) should be
ducted from the allowed Nitrogen of 50 lbs.
you have any questions please contact me at 252-946-6481, ext. 318.
Reviewerllnspector Name
Re►iewer/ksnector Signatu

I Facility Number 25 47 I
Q Permitted E Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified O Registered
Date of Inspection 4$99
Time of Inspection 1500 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Nof O cralional Dale Last Operated:
Farm Name: Saulm):.LauaXarm..-................. _........................... ...... .....__............ ........ County: Crayen....................... ....................... WARD.......
........ Lanu.........._..._............_._........................... Phone No: 252-52Z1234...._..............................._.
Osmer Name: Sammy......._._ ................. ....._....._.....
FaeilitsContact: ................... ........ ...... _... _... _............... _............ Title: .._...... _.................................................... Phone No:
Mailing Address: . ....._..._._......_ D.oxer.NC........................... ......_.........................._ 28526.............
Onsite Representath e:$arnmYl.anF..C11QeAl.ane................................................... Integrator. Nculmfi....................... .................................... ..........
Certified Operator: William.S... ...... .......... ....... Lane. ..... ...._..__................... - .......... .. Operator Certification Number: 16332.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 35 19 10 Lone4tude F 77 • ! 21 OS l-
Design Current
Swine Cavacity Pooulatiov
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
1500
1500
❑ Farrow, to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
es.gu
Poultry Capacity Po ulation Cattle
❑ Layer ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Laver I I JEJ Non-Dair
❑ other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons JE1Subsurface Drains Presort O Lagoon Area Tpr Say Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharge, & Stream Imna'l,
1. Is my discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge ot'iginaled ac ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Otber
a. If discharge is obscn'ed, was the comreymce man-made?
b_ Ifdischarge is ob,m d, did it reach Water of0te Slate?(Uves. nolif} DWQ)
e, 11'discbargc is ob:er,ed- what Ls the estimated ❑osy in -aVntin?
d. Does discharge bypass a I.eonn-Tsleri?(If) es. nolSy DWQ)
2. Is there evidence ofpan discharge from any part ofthe operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other thm from a discharge?
\Paste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus norm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Smueture 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes lg No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes $ No
Structure 6
Identifier: ................................ . .. .................................... ........................... . .
Freeboard(inches): ............. A ... _........... .............................. ................ _..... ..... ... _.... _................. ... _... ................ ....... ............. - ... _..............
5. Are there any, immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? fie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes g No
seepage, etc.)
:m/99 Cnnenued nn AvcA

Facility Number: 25-47 Date of Inspection
4-5-99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Aulication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Regui-red Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie,/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23, Did Reviewerliuspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
�In i�iolativris: or.ddieien.deswere tdt,te'd:durihk this Visit:: Ydti wiU'r&eive 'no %rth& : - : -
-correspondence about this visit., - - : . .
xords available for review.
wettable determination is not necessary. The waste plan was written maccordance to the irrigation design
15 - 2,41) has been sprayed to address teh broad leaf. Continue your efforts to improve the cover crop.
sere is a debris pile in the spray field which needs to be removed at your earliest convenience. It was discusssed that the irrigation
stem was installed around the debris pile.
'astewater has not applied this winter.
you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-6481, ex-t. 318.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewerllnspector Sinnatu

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Sammy Lane
Sammy Lane Farm
10705 Hwy 55 West
Dover NC 28526
Farm Nurn be �-�_5- �47
Dear Sammy Lane:
AN x1vt-1
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCE5
June 22, 1999
I
JUN 2 3 1999
WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
DWQ
You are hereby notified that Sammy Lane Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Carl Dunn with the Washington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely, 1
_ -•"
�
f•
1
JYe J
for
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
t)kas�jngton Regional Office (wyL encl.)
P.D. Box 29535, Raleigh, forth Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection �1J 24 hr. (hh:mm}
13 Registered ® Certified [3 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:............ _.........
Farm Name. � r# 4 --•-- County:.....................................................................................
OwnerName: .......... _ .......... S �, �. ............... ��, c............... ............................ ........ Phone No:.....................................................................................
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative:
5'k.,ti.. L4,<_
Title:
Integrator:
Phone No:
Lt1
Certified Operator: ..... ......... S h "` "• 7......... '�................... .,.............. ........... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
A
gr............................. ............... .. .................. ................ ........ ............... ....................................................
Latitude 6 66 Longitude ' "
Design Current
swine Capacity 'Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
1500
'Td
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
.Design Current. Design. Current n .
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Populationi
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I JEI Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SS.LW
:J
N umber of Lagoons IHoldxng Ponds. t
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
Lagoon Area I[]
Spray Field Area
.
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
10 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gat/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
® No
mai ntenancelimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
C% No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
R1 No
7/25/97
Continued on hack

Facility Number: Z 5 -- �
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes C9 No
Structures fLaeoons.Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, ete.l
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier.
Freeboard (ft): 3. 5
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes 69 No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type �Xr................. cl.�...................�....�.............................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No.violationsoi deFzciencies.were 'no' ted-dtiring this'.visit.- Yod,,iifl no ftirther,
eyrrespofidence obout this: visit:• : - :
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes Ef No
❑ Yes E } No
r
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ❑ No
7125/97
Reviewer/inspector Name17
71
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:

l
�• _
1 Feedlot Operation Review
DSWC Anima
❑
s DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection coon �==A
u
r
i Routine Q Complaint Q Follow -up -of DW ins section ❑ Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Date of Inspection
Faeility :Number '25 y
Tithe of Inspection 7;DD 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time fin fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit iex:1..25 for I hr 15 min}} Spent on Review
0Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
0 Not O per ttittnal Date Last Operated:................................................................................................................................................
FarrrtNanrte: �-It 5�•t' Furw• CountF: r+�rEv►
Owner IM1ante:..,..... 54 VI.!"!......L'..na................................................ I.. ...... ................. Phone No: ...........................1.�.3........
................ I.......................
�27— 9
Facility Contact: ...... N!'^." y... .".. ............................ Title:................................................................ Phone No:..................................................
Mailing Address: D ©Sr 5 1'1% O�.........Ij C...---.... ................................................. ............. .........
i..........................."']'............................................... .....
(]nsite RepresentatiFe:.....,,..`tt*"'` ��"� integrator:....
�........................................................................................................................................................
Certified Operator:................�_w,.,,y.............. .'` .......................................I......... Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm: 7
Latitude ` Oc �:: Longitude ` Oc �::
Type of Operation Design . Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
I Soo
13 5O
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Other
C
C
Design Current Design Current..:
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle -Capacity Population....
Layer ❑ Dairy
�JEI
Non-Laver ❑Non-Dairy
Total Design Capacity
Total SSL W
Number aF,Lagflvns l Halding.Pvniis rT ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
, L J
General
1. Are there any buffers that need. maintenance/improvement?
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Dkc.harge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. It discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gallntin?
d. Ones discharge bypass a lagoon system" (If yes. notify DWQ)
1 Is there evidence of past discharge from any par[ of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
413 D197 maintenance/improvement :?
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes �fNo
❑ Yes. ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes jffNo
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes KNo
Continued on back

FaW; Iity Number:...- ........ 7
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
R ct "r s (Lqgoons an or Ilol 1 Q P d
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard {ft}: Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11_ Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
[:]Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 19 No
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes JgNo
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes PI No
❑ Yes &No
Waste -ARnlicatiog
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes KNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering: waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type l'X � ry............... ...................... ........
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilfi,rs Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes iRrNo
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes I$ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes PrNo
❑ Yes D9 No
❑ Yes P'No
Comments {refer. to question #} :Explain'any. YES answers'andlor.any recommendatioiis�or anyother cainmerits.=
Ilse. drawings of facthty to:better ex lain situations. {use addittotial pages as necessary}:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

t
Craven Soil and Water Conservation District
302 Industrial Drive - New Bern, NC 28562 - Phone [phone]
Apr- i I?, �, 1.-,'�7 ... r
WASHIN TON OFFICE
Mr-. Sammy Lane
10705 Hwy. 55 West.
Dover, N.C. 2:15tZr-�
Subject : Ciperat i con Review
i~ ac i I i ty 2 ;-47
Craven County
Dear Mr. Lame:
APR 2-8 1997
&� it
FF
Correct i ve Act i on Recornrnendat i on
Ort Apr I l Z4, an Ciperat I on Revi e,4 was conducted of Sammy
Lane' s Livestock f=arrn, fa.c i l i ty no.r7'5-47. ` h i s Rev eta+,
under-tai.en i n accordance wi th 0.S. 14'-5-Z15.I0D, i s one of
two v i s i is sr:hedu I ed f or a I r-eg i stered I ivestocF. cq erat i on
during the f's+:-�7 calendar- year. The Division of i�Iater-
Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
Dur i rtg the Review, it was determi reed that waste was ric-t
being discharged to the waters of the State, and the an irna i
waste co l i ect i on, treatment and storage systerns were
maintained and operated under- the respor,s i b l e charge of a
cent i f i ed operat:or-. Hc-wevpr, the f o I I owi rig management
deficiencies were discovered and noted for corrective
act i ort: two trees apparent I y Fe I I ed t-y w i nd un North I agoe)n
s I cape needs r emova 1 to proper i y mow d i kes and some rn i nor
debr i s i rt I a3oort pool area needs removal . These rnzinagement
deficiencies need to be addressed and ccir-r-ected. You are
encouraged to contact your certified technical specialist if
add i t i orlaI assistance is rte.eded. During ensuing reviews,
these same def i c i enc i es w i I I be re-eNarni ned to determine if'
corrective actions were i mp l ernented . I also recommend that
you r bta i n Borne type of filing box with file fo 1 digs to
assist you in y.: ur- record keeping or sorne other- simple
practical method. Also, obtain copies of supporting design
data from district files to aid in completing your state
permit application when received. Zither rec o mrnendat i c-ns
i nc I ude adequate dike mowing during the surnmer months to
eliminate undesirable ve;3etation; also, pay special
attention to tans; pipe connections and other pipe ic- i nts to
assure yourse i f this is rain water and not eff i uen't. It is
noted that rainfall the previous two days pr- i car- to this
review amounted to 1-Z inches.
In order - for your- faci 1 ity to remain in compliance with
environmental regu l at i runs, animal waste c ar+rt-: t be discharged
into the waters r:f the State, and the.animal waste
cc- I l ect i on, treatment, storage and disposal systems roust be
CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT • SELF-GOVERNMENT
4 primed an recycled Ps—

' w=
RK-OREC# Y rna i nta i ned and rlEerated under the responsible
charge of a certified operator.
The Craven Soil & Water Conservation District office
appreciates your cooperation with, this Operation Review.
F 1 ease du neat h e s i tate to c a I I me at 919-6:-:7-2547 i f you
have any questions, concerns or need additional information.
4Sincerely-,
.H. Fields, it
District Technician
cc : Pat I-I'Doper - Operation Review Represeritat i ve
Car'ro I I Pierce - Division ..,f S... i l ' Water

- S:- •E'> da-L�J. a:�,hr .-�'a"
DS'L'4'C� Animal:Feedlot U eration Reyie
®.P`
-� =W.
a :
..�,.
D AS 'ma ' F d16i, O ei=atior W nt 1 ee p- nspec ��sw'
;r•ZK
Facility Number 2
Farm Status: Certified
Date of Inspection 4124197
Time of inspection a930 Use 24 hr. time
Inspection time 2 hrs.
Farm Name:
Sammy Lane Farm _ •_
County:
Craven
Owner Name:
_Sammy Lame __ __ _.� .� _
_ Phone No:
527-1239
Mailing Address: _1fl70....HVX:....55„West............. _ _...._......
...�.'...
❑nsite representative: ... Sammy Lame Integrator: independent
Certified Operator Name: Sammy Lane
Location of Farm:
2.5 miles West of Ft.
Latitude L`J•10 u
i
4
Longitude 77 • 21 95 u
0 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
A
Stein .:Poulcir+ x C m
_ r
a
3
. ❑ Wean to Feeder uT ❑ La �;� ❑ Dai p^.
®Feeder to Finish 1500 Non -La er Beef
Farrow to WeanEl
- ,, :: "
Farrow to Feeder, `.=z-`.::� c ' -p ;
;..
Farrow to Finish ❑ Other Type of Livestock
ro
urtt pfx. g an nTd ttgPRrid 1 0 Subsurface Drains Present-
:La oon Ara 0Spray Field Area ,
General , . _ ;,, . .. .. , - , •. , .. -
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? .
a, if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify ❑WQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVinin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from arty -part ofthe optration�: ��'�
4. Was there any adverse impacts to -the waters of the State .other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
--- - _ -- -'-' maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes M-0
/0
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes It34
❑ Yes QW,
❑ Yes l 4
Continued on back

6. Is facility not i : compliance wish any applicable setback cri.c;ia7
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1II197)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons a dlor Hoidin Ponds
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (f%): Lagoon] Lagoon 2
10.. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
0 Yes tea"
d Yes M.Z'f��
❑ Yes ELNd.
[� Yes L.f No
Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
I2. Do any of the structures need maintemmce/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type _ _ _ ......... _ .._ . �!�` _. _..... _ ...._.............._........_. w ..
16_ Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Cln1y
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to disams review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes
2'No
❑ Yes
Qgq-0
QI-Y<s
O No
❑ Yes
BN16
0 Yes
Leo'
[] Yes
ULW
❑ Yes
93-Nr
Cl Yes
9;-Nvr—
❑ Yes
1
❑ Yes Ut'90
❑ Yes " Cf'"
�s ❑ No
❑ Yes 91-NO
❑ Yes + W-
12. Two trees felled by wind on North end of lagoon need removing from dike for
proper mowing maintenance. Minor debris from pool area also need removal.
22. Record keeping need improvement. Suggest additional training from extension
service.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviwerllnspector Signature:
Date: 412419 7
Dipision of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit
1 I/I4/96