250038_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qua'
F)

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

• M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
EI Other Agency
Facility Number: 250038 Facility Status: Achw Permit: AM250038
Denied Access
I npsectlon Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date'.
Reasonfor Visit Routine County: Craven Region:
Washington
Date of Visit 021OW2016 Entry Time: 09'.00am Exit Time: 12:00 pm Incident#
Farm Name: Moss Hill Farm Owner Email:
carsonjones4l@yahoor
Owner Carson Jones Phone:
252-244-1052
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd Vancebora NC 285868575
Physical Address: 6319 River Rd Vancebora NC 28586
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLB
Location of Farm Latitude: 35' 15' 18" Longitude:
]T° 12r49"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2
miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. Access mad is adjacent to Mr. Jones' home.
Question Areas:
DischMe & Stream Impacts Waste Col. Stor. & Treat Waste Application
Records add Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Warren Carson Jones Operator Cedificatlon Number'. 16330
Secondary OICOF
On -Site Representativets): Name Till. Phone
24 hour contact name Carson Jones Phone'.
On -site representative Carson Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Shiley
Inspector Signature:
Secondary lnspectogs):
Inspection Summary:
Sludge Survey 12-11}15 Thick-371'
LTZ-2'9'
Pump intake-4'10") need to do additional calculations for sludge ratio
Waste Analysis
12-9-15 84
10-5-15
.68
7-10-15
.84
3-29-15
1.03 ) sent in new waste analysis
Soil Test due 2017
Freeboard & Rainfall complete ) need to initial 1"or greater rainfall
Crop yield complete
24) No calibration complete in 2015
7) Continue efforts maintaining lagoon banks
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWS250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 02/03/16 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 2,600 2.600
Total Design Capacity: 2.600
ToWISSLW: 78,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Data Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 1950.27,00
page 2

permit: AWS250038 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number 250038
Inspection Dale: 02/03/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit. Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑0
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any pad of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage 8 Tmahnent
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6, Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
?. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No Na W
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑0
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Pending?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 109h110 Ili ?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS250038 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number:
250038
Inspection Date' 02/03/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit.
Routine
Waste Application
yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
coastal Bermuda Gass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
smell Gram Overseen
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
'
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)? 1
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑0
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lad adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Na
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
0
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit. AVVS250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number:
250038
Inspection Date. 02/03/16 Inpsection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No No He
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ M
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
M
❑ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ 0
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No No No
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
its , discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31, Do subsurface tile drains ..,at at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

ODivision of Water ResoorCare
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number: 250038 Facility Status: Adbve Permit: AWS250038 ❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit Routine County Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 01129Y015 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 10'.00 am Incident#
Farm Name: Moss Hill Farm Owner Email carsonlones4l @yahoo.)
Owner: Carson Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd Vanceboro NO 285868575
Physical Address, 6319 River Rd Vanceboro NO 28586
Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 15' 18" Longitude: 77' 12' 49"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2
miles wrest of the Intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443, Access road Is adjacent to Mr. Jones' home.
Question Areas:
Dischrge 8 Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stm, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator:
Warren Carson Jones
Operator Certification
Number: 16330
Secondary OIC(s)f
On -Site Represe odive(s):
Name
Title
Phone
24 hour contact name
Carson Jones
Phone:
On -site representative
Carson Jones
Phone:
Primary Inspector:
Megan H Stilley
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Data
Secondary Inspectors)
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis 1-6-15 92
9-26-14 )0
➢-24 14 93
430-14 1.21
Soil Test 1-10-14 wl highest lime 0 tons
Cu 8 Zn values whin range
Calibration complete 9-11-13
Freeboard 8 Rainfall complete 8 Correspond wl irrigation
Crop yield complete - facility faxed DWR a copy
25) No 2014 Sludge Survey
'Maintain bare areas on lagoon bank
page'. 1

Permit: AWS250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 01/29/15 npsection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder I 2,600 I 2,550
Total Design Capacity: 2,600
Total SSLW: 78,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 19Ao 31.00
page'. 2

Permit. AWS250038 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number. 250038
Inspection Date: 01/29/15 Inppection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for VisitRoutine
Discharges 8 Stream Impacts
Yes
No No Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at.
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Ns No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
?. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/Or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? -
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 Ibs9
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page' 3

Permit AWS250038 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number:
250038
Inspection Date. 01/29/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Be—da crass
(Hi
Crop Type 2
Small cram
oveaaec
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Scil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑0
❑
❑
16 Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
E ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
a ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
MP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather Code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page. 4

PermitAWS250038 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number'
250038
Inspection Date: O1/29/15 hosection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No No No
Crop yields'
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ M
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
M
❑ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: I
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively codified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Otherlssues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
011
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(ie., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface his drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon/Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page. 5

ODivision of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number: 25W38 Facility Status: Active
Permit AWS250038
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date,
Reasonfor Visit Routine County.
Craven Region:
Washington
Date of Visit 051222014 Entry Time: 0900am Exit Time: 10:00am Incident#
Farm Name: Moss Hill Farm
Owner Email:
Owner: Carson Jones
Phone:
252-2441052
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd
Vanceboro NC 285MB575
Physical Address: 6319 River Rd
Vanceboro NC 285M
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Broom LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35° 15' 18" Longitude:
A° 12' 49"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southem
side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2
miles west of the intersection between NCSR 14M and NCSR 1443. Access road is adjacent to Mr. Joneshome.
Question Areas:
Dechrge 8 Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stoo 8 Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator:
Seeded., OIC(s):
Warren Carson Jones
Operator Certification Number. 16330
OnSite Representative(st:
Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name
Carson Jones
Phone:
On -site representative
Carson Jones
Phone:
Primary Inspector.
Megan H Shiley
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Infractions):
Inspection Summary
page: 1

Permit: AWS250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Dates 05/22/14 Inpseclion Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit Routine
Calibration complete 9-11-13 ) next one due 2015
Sail Test 1-10-14 w/ highest lime 0 tons) next one due 2017
Cu & Zn values wlin range
Waste Analysis 4-30-14 1.21
12-27.13 1.06
9-30-13 .98
8-8-13 .89
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond! wl irrigation
Sludge Survey 12-2-13 Thick-1.9'
LTZ-5.3'
Pump intake-5.9'
Update crop yield for wheat
])continue to maintain lagoon
page: 2

Permit: AWS250038 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 05/22/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Sere -Wean to Feeder I 2,600 I 2,538
Total Design Capacity: 2,600
TotaISSLW: 78,0W
Waste Structures
Disignated Ob.a,.d
Typo Identifier Closed Date Start Data Freeboard! Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 19,50 31.00
page: 3

Permit. AWS250038 Owner - Facility'. Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date. 05/22/14 Inpsection Type'. Compliance Inspection Reason for VisitRoutine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
IN ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (d yes, notify DWO)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage 8 Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I. e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
?. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
M
❑ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Na
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10 % /10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page. 4

Permit. AWS250038 Owner - Facility' Carson Jones Facility Number 250038
Inspection Date: 05/22/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes Na as Ne
Crop Type 1 Coapai semmda Grass
(nay)
Crop Type 2 S-11 Gram oseraeed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Tamoro sand, o to sw
Mope:
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
no
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18, Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather cod.9
❑
Rainfall?
❑
page'. 5

Permit: AWS250038 Owner - Facility'. Carson Jones Facility Number:
250038
Inspection Date05/22/14 Inpsection Type'. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit.
Routine
Records and Documents
Yie
No No W
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ E
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate boxes) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
110
❑
Other Issues
Y.
No Na Ye
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑E
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑E
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon/Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
E ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 6

N Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250038 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250038 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Dateof Visit: 03/08/2013 Entry Time: 0930 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM Incident#:
Farm Name: Moss Hill Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Carson Jones Phone: [phone]
r ..
Physical Address: 6319 River Rd Vanceboro NC 28586
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°15'18" Longitude: 77°12'49"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2 miles
west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. Access road is adjacent to Mr. Jones' home.
Question Areas:
Dischige & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Warren Carson Jones Operator Certification Number: 16330
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Carson Jones Phone:
On -site representative Carson Jones - Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 03/08/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Sludge Survey 12-10-12 Thick-1.9'
LTZ-5.3') Get pump intake measurement
Waste Analysis
2-13-13 .72
11-29-12
.68
B-22-12
.83
6-14-12
1.36
Soil Test 2-22A3 (2012 Sample) highest lime 0 tons
Cu & Zn values w/in range
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond w/ irrigation
Crop yield complete - sprayed for army worms
Calibration complete 2011 - wetted diameter & Flaw rate greater than 10% need to address & contact tech specialist
Page:2

Permit: AWS25003B Owner Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Data: OW0812013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Wean to Feeder 2.600 2,538
Taint Design Capacity: 2,600
Total SSLW: - 78,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Stan Date Freeboard Freeboard
1-goon PRIMARY 19,50 29.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250038 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 0310812013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yea No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWD)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d, Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWD)
Cl
M
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
Cl
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the pemlit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
Cl
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
Cl
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Funding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page:4

Permit: AWS250038 owner -Facility: Carson Jones
Facility Number:
250038
Inspection Date: DWOBRO13 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reasonfor Visb:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
Is PAN > 10 % /10 los.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
0
Crop Type 1
Small Grain Overused
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Gress
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
0 ■
0 ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
1300
0
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
0 0
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
0 Cl
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0 ■
0 ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificates of Coverage and Permit readily available?
0 0
0 Cl
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
0 ■
Cl 0
It yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
0
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250038 Owner - Facility: Carson Jonas
Inspection Date: 03108I2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number:
Reason for Visft:
25W38
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
Cl
Design?
Cl
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other!
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
00011
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑-
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating noncompliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively codified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page:6

Permit: AWS250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 03/06/2013 Inspection Typo: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250038
Re asonfor Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0
■
D
Otherissues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■ 0
D
mortality rates that exceed normal fates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concem? If yes, contact a regional
0
D 0
■
Air Duality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWD of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
0
■ 0
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
0
■ 0
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
0
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Cl
Other
0
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
DMD❑
0M0❑
0■00
Page:7

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ OtherAgency
Facility Number: 250038 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250038 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washinaton
Date of Visit: 06/21/2012 Entry Time: 09:00 AM Exit Time: 11:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Moss Hill Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Carson Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd Vancebom NC 285868575
Physical Address: 6319 River Rd Vancebom NC 28586
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°15'18" Longitude; 77°1249"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Fans entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2 miles
west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. Access road is adjacent to Mr. Jones' home.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cal, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Warren Carson Jones
Operator Certification Number: 16330
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Carson Jones
Phone:
On -site representative Carson Jones
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s)
Inspection Summary:
Calibration complete 7-30-11
-Solid set calibration variance greater than 10 % for Flow rate and weded diameter - contact technical specialist
Sludge Survey due 2012
Waste Analysis 3-13-12 1.4
12-28-11 .90
9-29-11 .80
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond w/ irrigation
Crop yield complete
Soil Test 12-29-11 w/ highest lime 0 tons
Cu & Zn values w/in range
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 06/2112012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine- Wean to Feeder 2,600 2,538
Total Design Capacity: 2,600
Total SSLW: 78,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Data Freeboard Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 19.50 33.00
Page:2

Permit: AWS250038 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 06/21/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0011
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
In
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Forcing? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page:3

Permit: AWS250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones
Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 0612112012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 Its.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Tarboro sand, 0 to 6 %
slopes
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4 '
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
000
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
000
❑
20. Does the facility,fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page:4

Permit: AWS250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 06I21R012 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Facility Number:
Reason for Visit:
250038
Routine
Records and Documents
yes No
NA NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Page:5

permit: AWS250038 owner -Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 06/21/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250038
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
lies
No
NA
NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Otherlssues
yes
No
NA
NE
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
❑
❑
■
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
(1
■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface Tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑
❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Page:6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250038 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250038 El Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspect on Inactive or Closed Data:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washmaton
Date of Visit: 07119/2011 Entry Time:0800 AM Exit Time: 1030 AM Incident#:
Farm Name: Moss Hill Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Carson Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd Vanceboro NC 285868575
Physical Address: 6319 River Rd Vanrcboro NC 28586
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Mumhv-Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°15'18" Longitude: 77°12'49"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2 miles
west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. Access road is adjacent to Mr. Jones' home.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Warren Carson Jones Operator Certification Number: 16330
Secondary OIC)s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Carson Jones Phone:
On -site representative Carson Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Shiley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Data:
Secondary Inspectons):
Page

Permit: AWS250038 Owner . Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 07/19/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Vail Routine
Inspection Summary:
Calibrations due 2011
Soil Test 1-3-11 w/ highest lime 0 tons
Cu and Zn values w/in range
Waste Analysis 4-7-11 1.1
1-7-11 .91
'Just send off new sample and waiting for results
Need to update crop yield for small grain 8 Plenitude
yet baled hay off sprayfield
Rainfall 8 Freeboard complete 8 correspond w/ irrigation
Sludge Survey exempt till 2012
-Can go 8" below stp pump b/w June 15 - Oct 31st
No underground draintile in sprayflelds
'Maintain bare areas on lagoon
Page. 2

Parma: AWS250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Data: 07/19/2011 Inepection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Wean to Feeder 2.600 3,008
Total Design Capacity: 2,600
Total SSLW: 78,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Data Stan Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 1950.34.00
Page: 3

Permit AW250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 07/19W 1 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250038
Reason for Visit. Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge onginated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
Cl
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yea
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le / large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Cl
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
0
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
In
Page'. 4

Perroll AWS250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Dale: 0711912011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250038
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10 %110 lips
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Tarboro sand, 0 to 6 %
slopes
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
❑
❑
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the tactility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Pemrit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page'. 5

Permit. AM250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 07/1912011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other/ ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
I(yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ I ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ❑ ■
❑
24. Did the faality fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ 000
box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Noncompliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List struclure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Page:6

Permit: AWS250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 07/19/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ 0
D
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
0
D ■
0
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
0 D
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspedion did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
D D
■
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
0
■ D
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Da subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
0
0
0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field D
Lagoon/Storage Pond 0
Other
D
If Other, please specify
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? D ■ 0 D
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to dismiss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ w D 0
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? D w D 0
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250038 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250038 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Dateof Visit: 11/03/2010 Entry Time:10'00AM Exit Time: Incident
Farm Name: Moss Hill Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Carson Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd Vancebom NC 285868575
Physical Address: 6319 River Rd Vanceboro NC 28586
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Mumhv-Brown LL
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°15'18" Longitude: 77°12'49"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2 miles
west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. Access road is adjacent to Mr. Jones' home.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues .
Certified Operator: Warren Carson Jones Operator Certification Number: 16330
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s(:
Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name
Carson
Jones
Phone:
On -site representative
Carson
Jones
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s(:
Page:i

Permit: AWS250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones
Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 11/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis:2288(lagoon)
8/16/10.79
5/20/10 1.5
3/16/101.3
Soil test 12/30/09
Lime 0 tons
Cu & Zn values w!n range.
New Coc & permit was in records: 10/01/09
irrigation & freeboard corresponds to rainfall. Lagoon was @ 40" 9126/10
sludge survey extension until 2012.
"Calibration due 2011"
Coastal Bermuda had 3 cuttings. Wheat field #1 9 bushels.
field #2 12 bushels.
—recommending updating waste plan —
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 25DO38
Inspection Date: 1110312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Wean to Feeder 2,600 2.832
Total Design Capacity: 2,600
Total SSLW: 78,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Data Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 19.50 31,00
Page. 3

Permit: AWS250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 111ON2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250038
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
❑
Cl
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
Cl
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Forcing?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page:4

' Permit: AWS250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones
' Inspection Date: 11/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250038
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
D
Is PAN > 10 % /10 Ills.?
D
Total P2O5?
D
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
D
Outside of acceptable crop window?
D
Evidence of wind drift?
D
Application outside of application area?
D
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Tarboro
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
D
■
D
D
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Cl
■
D
D
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
D
■
D
Cl
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
D
■
D
D
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
D
■
D
D
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
D
D
D
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
D
D
D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
D
Page:5

Permit: AM25003B Owner- Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number:
250038
Inspection Date: 1110312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspedion Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
In
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
m
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
E
❑
❑
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
2T Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
E
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
IN
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
❑
❑
■
Quality representative immediately.
Page:6

Permit: AW5250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Dee: 11103/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 250038
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes
No
NA
NE
0000
D
00
D
00
Page:7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250036 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250038 ❑Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Dateof Visit: 11/03/2010 Entry Time: 10: 00 AM Exit Time: Incident#:
Farm Name: Moss Hill Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Carson Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd Vanceboro NC 285868575
Physical Address: 6319 River Rd Vanceboro NC 28586
Facility Status: 0 Compliant J Not Compliant Integrator: Mumhv-Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'15'18" Longitude: 77°12'49"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2 miles
west of the intersection beween NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. Access road is adjacent to Mr. Jones' home.
Question Areas:
Discharges 8 Stream Impacts Waste Collection 8 Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Warren Carson Jones Operator Certification Number: 16330
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Carson Jones Phone:
On -site representative Carson Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Data:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

permit: AW5250038 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 11/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis:2288(lagoon) Soil test 12/30/09
8116110 79 Lime 0 tons
5/20/10 1.5 Cu & Zn values wfin range.
3116/101.3
New Coe & permit was in records: 10/01/09
irrigation & lreeboant corresponds to rainfall. Lagoon was Q 40" 9/26/10
sludge survey exterebn until 2012.
"Calibration due 2011"
Coastal Bermuda had 3 cuttings. Wheat field #1 9 bushels.
field #212 bushels.
"recommending updating waste plan"
Page:2

Permit: AWS250038 Owner- Facility: Gerson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 1110312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Wean to Feeder 2,600 2,832
Total Design Capacity: 2,600
Total SSLW: 78,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Data Start Data Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon PRIMARY 1950.31.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number:
250038
Inspection Date: 1110312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspecton Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
MOO
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0
❑
❑
In, Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? if yes, notify DWO)
❑
m
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes; is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
?. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
m
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet slacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
Cl
■
❑
❑
Improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Forcing?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page:4

Permit: AWS250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 11/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250038
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
0
Is PAN > 10 % /10 Ibs '
0
Total P205?
0
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
0
Outside of acceptable crop window?
0
Evidence of wind drift?
0
Application outside of application area?
0
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Tarboro
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
0 ■
0 0
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0 ■
Cl 0
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 0 ■
Cl 0
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
0 ■
0 0
1B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0 ■
0 0
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA HE
19. Did the facility fail to have Cenificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
0 ■
0 ❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
0 ■
0 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
O
Page: 5

Permit AWS250038 Cromer - Facility: Carson Jones
Facility Number:
250038
Inspection Dace: 11/0312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
yes No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Farm (NPDES only)?
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Cl ■
Cl
Cl
23, If selecteQ did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ❑
■
❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
Cl ■
Cl
Cl
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
Cl 0
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
Cl
Cl
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Cl ❑
■
❑
Otherlissues
yes No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
Cl
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ Cl Cl
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30, Al the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? R yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page:6

Permit: AWS250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Data: 1110312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 250038
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
0000
Q ■ ❑ 11
❑ ■ Q ❑
Page: 7

e
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 250038 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250038 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Dateof Visit: 12/17/2009 Entry Tlme:10:00AM Exit Time: Incident III
Farm Name: Moss Hill Fan Owner Emall:
Owner: Carson Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd Vanceboro NC 285868575
Physical Address; 6319 River Rd Vanceboro NC 28586
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Mumhv-Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'15'18' Longitude: 77'12'49"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2 miles
west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. Access road is adjacent to Mr. Jones' home.
Question Areas:
Discharges 8 Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Warren Carson Jones Operator Certification Number: 16330
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Carson Jones Phone:
On -site representative Carson Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit AM250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones Faculty Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 1 V170009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Viet: Routine
Inspection Summary:
New COC and Permit in records
Waste Analysis 11-18-09 .98
8-20-09 .83
6-11-09 .76
Sludge excemption till 2012
Need to complete soil test 2009
Calibration 2-15-09-welled diameter off more than 15% - contact Ramman
*Updated WUP'
Rainfall and Freeboard complete and correspond with irrigation
Crop yield complete -only one cutting on bermuda
-work on getting yield up ) got 2 cutting 8 forgot to put in records
Page: 2

Permit AWS250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 12/1712009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Van: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Wean to Feeder 2,600 2,961
Total Design Capacity: 2.600
Total SSLW: 76,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Data Start Data Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoorr PRIMARY 19.50 32.00
Page3

Permit: AWS250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number:
250038
Inspection Data: 12/17I2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VlsN: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
Cl
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any pan of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
Cl
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage S Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (fe./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
❑
❑
or closure plan?
]. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
6. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
Cl
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any pan of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement? r
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
Cl
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
1311
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Funding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page

Permit: AVJ5250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 12/17/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250038
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10 % /10 Ibs ?
Cl
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6 -
Soil Type 1
Tarboro and, 0 to 6%
slopes
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4 ,
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving craps differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the imgation design or wettable acre determination?
- ❑
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
Cl
18is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
Cl
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page:5

Permit: AM250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones
Facility Number:
25003E
Inspection Dare: 12/17I2009 Inspection Typo: Compliance Inspecion
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
WUP?
Cl
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
Cl
Weather code?
Cl
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Cl
Waste Analysis?
Cl
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irngation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ❑
IN
Cl
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
Cl
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
Cl
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous lass assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
26. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑
❑
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page'. 6

PennN: AN5250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Data: 12117/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlinsues
yes
No
NA
NE
30. At the lime of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
O
G
0
■
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
0
0
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewrinspection with on -site representative?
11
■
C3
O
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
11 ■ ❑ 0
Page:7

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250038
Facility Status: Actve Permit:
6xiaz=38 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection TyPa: Compliance Inspection
Inactiveor Closed Date:
Reason for VislC Routine
County: QDritn
✓ Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/112008
Entry Time: 0800 AM E[Il Tlme:
Incident#:
Farm Name: Moss HIII Farm
Owner Email:
Owner: Carson Jones
Phone: [phone]
Melling Address: 6305 River Rd
VarreCom
NC. 285865575
Physical Address: 6305 River Rd
Vancebom
NC 28586
Facility Status: ❑Compliant
❑Not Compliant Integrator: Monte
Family Forms
Location of Famu
Latdude: 35-1518"
Longitude: 77°12'49-
Fam Is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Fang entrance Is located on the southern
side 0 NCSR 1400 approximately 2 miles
ease of Oe Intersennon beNveen NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. Access mad is adjacent
to Mr. Jones' home.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Waste C011echme & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
CoNfled Operator: Women Canyon Jones Operator Certification Number: 15330
Secondary OlClal:
OnSde Rapreaentativetsl: Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Carson Jones Phone:
On sae representative Carson Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H SMley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary inspections):
Page.1

P.—.:FW5i5'J03e Owmr- Facility- Carson Jones Faclllry, Number 25MM
IOspecllon pate: Oan 112WO Insisted- Type: Compfanr¢ Inspection Reason for Vlsll: Routine
Inspection Summary:
COC aid Permit 2009
Need to uprose, MP
Waste Analysis 8-28-08 11
515-08 2!
2-fl -
Sludge Geared out of lagoon in November 2007
Sludge Analysis 10-24-07 12.9
Sludge Pet on small grain 50 to PAN
Sludge Cleanout in compliance
'Waste analysis nM cunemt for November 2007
Freeboard and rainfall complete and correspond with imgaeion
Soil test 47-08 with highest lime 1,6 tons ) need lime
Sludge wn'ey 2-20-07 Thil B'
LTZ<.2'
'Need ralibratem for solid set ASAP ) will send form
Reel Calibration completed and next one due 2009
Page2

stools: PN505M38 Owner- Facllay: Canon Jones Faille, Number: 25WM
Inspection Date: mal 12W8 Inspection Type: Complance lospecoon Reason for Visit Routine
Regulated Opemdons Design Capacity Cuvent Populaion
Swine
Q Swine -Wean to Feeder 2.600 2573
Total Design Capacity: 2600
Total SStW: 78,000
Waste Structures
Tyge, dismarb., Claims Date Start Date Designed I'meboard Obsereed Freaboaml
Page. 3

earl AM250i Owner- Facile, Carson Jones Farsh, Number: 250030
Inspection Data: OW1112WO Inspection Ti Compliance Inspection reason forsish Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed Imm any Pan of the opetatlom
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Smi
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did dlwharge reach Waters of the State? (d yes, mfify DAD)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. EstimatM volume reaching smome waters?
d. Does discharge Bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DM)
❑ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a Past discharge from any pan of the operator?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse Impacts or potential adverse Impacts to Waters of the State other Nan Mom a
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dlscltarge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No Nor NE
4. Is storage ca ,al less loan coequals?
❑ \ ❑ ❑
If yes, Is waste level Into swdurel amended?
❑
5. Am there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of Me structures observed (I.a / large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
onsuor, spop,le, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site Mat are not pmpedy addressed anc or managed through a waste management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or Wsure plan?
]. Do any 0 the structures need maintenance or Im,ower ll?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
a. Do any of the structures lack adequate maMers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stags and/or we stacks)
g. Does any pan of Me waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
imphovemenf?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Ane them any tequired borer, secisios. or compliance altemaGves that need maintenance or
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Improvement?
11. Is Mere evidence of Mcooectoppiioation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check Me appropriate box below.
Excessive Podding?
❑
Hydraulic Overloud?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Penn: AW535o030 Owner - Facil": Canon Jones
Inspection pate: 09111I2009 Inspection Type: Compllantt Inspection
Waste Application
PAN?
Is PAN � 10%I10Ita?
Total P2059
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soib
Outside of amepable crop winds
Evidence a wind Erin?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Feclllry Nu.., 250330
ReasonfarvI l: ROWne
Yes No NA NE
EI
In
Cassel Bermuda Cass
(Hey)
Crop 2 small Go. oves-d
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Sal Type 1
Sal Type 2
Sol Type 3
Sal Type 9
Sal Type 5
Sal Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops diner ham those designated In the Cashed! Animal Waste Management
PIan1CAMP)7 is
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Dd the fi liry fail to secure and/or operate per the ivgati0n design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the ability lack adequate acreage for land application?
19. Is there a lack of pmpehy operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Rd the fatllity all to have Carlficate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20, Does the ability but to have all mmponente of Na CAMP readily available?
It yes, the k me appropriate box assay.
Ai
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Elmo
Yee No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
Page: 5

Pa..: AN5250939 Owner Facifry: Carson Jones
Facility Number: 25WU
Inspiration Data: 011112000 Inspenion Type: Compliance Inspection
Reasonfor Vieit RONine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 MmJtb Inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freebpa d?
❑
Transrers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspedions after t inch rainfall & mummy?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual CedRwdon Form (N PDES chly)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ❑ ❑
23.If selected] did the facility fail to install and maintain a renbreaker on lmgation egWpment(NPDES only)? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility hail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ❑ ❑
26 Did Me facility fail to have an adrvery codified operator in charge?
❑ ❑ ❑
27 Die Its, facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) cu ifismon?
❑ ❑ ❑
Dttlef I.I.
Yee No NA NE
26. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
29, Did the facility fall to pNpedy dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
modality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time Ol the nee tion did the facility Was an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Pamir aR5zsi Owner. Facility: Carson Jones
Inslxnlon Date: O&t trzO]6 IngNGtion Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 25MM
Reason fora islo Routine
Other Issues
Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fall to notify regional QWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
C3 ■
32. Did Reviewerflnspector fail to discuss review/mspeadmn win on -site representative?
0 ■ 00
33. Qoes facility require a follow-up viet by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250038 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250038 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Data of Visit: 07/11/2007 Entry Time:01:30 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Moss Hill Fann Owner Email:
Owner: Carson Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd Vanceboro NC 285868575
Physical Address: 6305 River Rd Vanceboro NC 28586
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°16'10" Longitude: 77°13'00"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2 miles
west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. Access road is adjacent to Mr. Jones' home.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Warren Carson Jones Operator Certification Number: 16330
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Carson Jones Phone:
24 hour contact name Carson Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell Phone:
Inspector Signature: Dale:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AW5250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 0711112007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
'Need copy of COC and Permit
'Need to update WUP
Waste analysis 5.29-07 2.2
3-9-07 1.7
12-22-06 1.2
Calibrations 2-1-07 with 131 GPM) use this value on IRR-2
24)NEEDTO CALIBRATE THE SOLID SET SPRINKLER SYSTEM
Sludge survey2-20-07 thick-1.8' LTZ-0.2'
Crop yield complete 2006
Soil test 3-20-07 with highest lime 0 tons
Cu and Zn values within range
Rainfall and freeboard complete - need to lagoon level down for the Fall
Irrigation records complete and correspond with freeboard
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Dale: 07/11/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Wean to Feeder 2.600 2.149
Total Design Capacity: 2.600
Total SSLW: 78.000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 19.50 2400
Page:3

Permit: AWS250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 0711112007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number:
Reason for Visit;
250038
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
D
D
0
Discharge originated at:
Structure
0
Application Field
0
Other
0
a. Was conveyance man-made?
D
■
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
F
■
F
D
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
D
■
D
D
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
D
0
D
D
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
D
0
D
D
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
0
0
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
D
■
0
D
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markets as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
D
■
F
D
dry stacks and/or at stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
D
0
D
D
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
D
■
D
0
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
D
M
D
D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Pending?
D
Hydraulic Overload?
D
Frozen Ground?
D
Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)?
D
Page:4

Permit: AWS250038 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection pate: 07/11/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250038
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Tolal P2O5?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Crap Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crap Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Tarboro sand, 0 to 6%
slopes
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving craps differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
❑
❑
1S. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
■
❑
❑
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250038 Darner - Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 07/1112007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250038
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
Maps?
Other?
Q
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Q
Waste Analysis?
Annual soil analysis?
0
Crop yields?
Q
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a minbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
0
IN
0
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
Cl
D
0
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
p
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous lass assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
Otherlssues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
0
fl
❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page:6

Permit: AW5250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 07111/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssue5
Yes
No
NA
NE
30. Al the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
n
n
■
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
n
■
n
n
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlnspection with on -site representative?
n
■
n
n
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
mm71n
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number; 250038 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250038 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Structure Evaluation Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Follow-up County: Craven Region: Washington
Date all 12/01/2006 Entry Time: 1021 AM Exit Time: Incident#:
Farm Name:
Owner:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35*16'10" Longitude: 77°13'00"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2 miles
west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. Access road is adjacent to Mr. Jones' home.
Question Areas:
W Waste Collection & Treatment
Certified Operator: Warren Carson Jones Operator Certification Number: 16330
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Carson Jones Phone:
24 hour contact name Carson Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell Phone:
Inspector Signature: Dale:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Follow-up because lagoon levels high on last visit and the area received significant rainfall. Lagoon level not compliant and Mr. Jones
failed to notify DWQ.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 1VOI12006 Inspection Type: Structure Evaluation
Facility Number: 250038
Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Waste Structures
Tvice Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agore PRIMARY 1950 18,00
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
Fi
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
F1
m
0
0
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
n
n
■
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
fT
❑
❑
0
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
n
n
■
improvement?
Page: 2

Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250038 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250038 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Ememencv County: Craven Region: Washington
Dateof Visit: 09/02/2006 Entry Tlme:09.40 AM Exit Time: Incident III:
Farm Name: Moss Hill Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Carson Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd Vanceboro NC 285868575
Physical Address: 6305 River Rd Vanceboro INC 28586
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35"16'10" Longitude: 77°13'00"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2 miles
west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. Access road is adjacent to Mr. Jones' home.
Question Areas:
M Waste Collection & Treatment
Certified Operator: Warren Carson Jones Operator Certification Number: 16330
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Carson Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell Phone:
Inspector Signature: Dale:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Checking freeboard levels after Tropical Storm Ernesto. Facility in compliance.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250038 Owner Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 09/02/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Emergency
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoan PRIMARY 19.50 29.00
Waste Collection, Storage _&,Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there stmctures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
U
■
❑
❑
R. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
f]
■
Q
U
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any pan of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
n
n
improvement?
Page: 2

E Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250038 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250038 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Wash'naton
Data of Visit: 03/27/2006 Entry Time: 09:00 AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM Incident 8:
Farm Name: Moss Hill Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Carson Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd Vanceboro NC 285868575
Physical Address: 6305 River Rd Vancebom NC 28586
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°15'30" Longitude: 77°13'00"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2 miles
west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. Access road is adjacent to Mr. Jones' home.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Warren
Carson Jones
Operator Certification
Number:
16330
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Carson Jones Phone:
24 hour contact name Carson Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s): -
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Data: 03/27/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
W UP 8-25-97 - Need to get plan updated
COC and Permit covered through 2009
Waste Analysis 2-1-06 1.4
9-9-05 1.2
6-3-05 1.5
Make sure to get waste sample 60 before or after irrigation events. Outside of crop window for Bermuda, irrigated 3-29-05. WUP plan
starts 4.1 and if updated will expand to March.
Soil test 2-16-05 with highest lime 1.4 tons. Applied lime in April 05'
Cu and Zn values within range
21) make sure to initial by rain events greater than 1'
7) Address barespots on lagoon, erosion has started. Will do a follow-up visit this summer to check progress on lagoon coverage.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 25W38
Inspection Date: 83I27I20D6 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Wean to Feeder 2,600 2,288
Total Design Capacity: 2,600
Total SSLW: 78.000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Data SGR Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 19.50 24.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 03/27/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250038
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any pan of the operation?
n
m
n
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
n
Application Field
n
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
■
n
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the Stale? (if yes, notify DWO)
n
■
n
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWO)
n
0
n
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
m
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the Stale other than from a
❑
0
n
n
discharge?
Waste_ Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
71
erosion, seepage. etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -she that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management
n
■
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
n
❑
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
Is
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
■
n
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Pending?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page:4

Permit: AWS2500M Owner- Facility: Carson Jones
Facility Number:
250038
Inspection Date: 0W2712006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/101Ins.?
El
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
Cl
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda
Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Sail Type 1
Tarboro
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n .m
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Cl ■
Q
11
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ m
❑
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ 0
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
11 ■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n ■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250038 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 03/27/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250038
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Vas No NA NE
Checklists?
n
Design?
n
Maps?
n
Other?
n
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■ n o Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
0
Waste Analysis?
E
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
0
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
■
n
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
n
n
■
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
n
■
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
0
n
Other -issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. Al the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concem? If yes, contact a regional Air
00
n
■
Quality representative immediately.
Page:6

Permit: AWS250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: OS/ M006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherissues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 250038
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes
No
NA
NE
mmC1❑
III
■n❑
■nnn
Page:7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 002`388 _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250038 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07/1312005 Entry Time: 02:30 PM Exit Time: Incident k:
Farm Name: Moss Hill Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Carson Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd Vanceboro NC 285868575
Physical Address: 6305 River Rd Vanceboro NC 28586
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy Family Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°15'30" Longitude: 77°13'00"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2
miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. Access road is adjacent to Mr. Jones' home.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts 0 Waste Collection S Treatment Waste Application
0 Records and Documents Other. issues
Certified Operator: Warren Carson Jones Operator Certification Number: 16330
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Name
Title Phone
On -site representative
Carson
Jones
Phone:
24 hour contact name
Carson
Jones
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
Current soil test
Waste analysis: Ibs N per 1000 gal
6-3-05 = 1.5
3-10-05 = 1A
12-3-04 = 1.3
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 07I132005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection - Reasonfor Visit Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine- Wean to Feeder
2,600
2.640
Total
Design Capacity:
2,600
Total SSLW:
78,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier
Closed Date Start
Date Designed Freeboard
Observed Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 19.50 25.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250038
Inspection Date: 07/13/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
raes R Stream Imparts
1. Is any discharge observed from any pad of the operation?
Ven
❑
Nn NA
❑
NF
❑
Discharge originated at
Sore cure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
It. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any pad of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑
Yee
❑
NO NA
❑
NE
Waste fnllprtinn. I tnrane K Treatment
4. Is storage rapacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe erosion,
❑
❑
❑
seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed andfor managed through a waste management or
❑
❑
❑
closure plan?
]. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lad adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roefed pits, dry stacks
❑
❑
❑
andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
❑
❑
improvement?
Yes
No NA
NF
Waste Ampficatlon
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or Improvement?
❑
N ❑
❑
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Forcing?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/101bs ?
❑
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Bad,, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 07I132005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250038
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Annlicat ion
Crop Type 5
yes,
No NA
NE
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Tarboro
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Carthed Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑
N ❑
❑
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
0 ❑
❑
17. Does the lacility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18, Is there a tack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑
Vee
0 ❑
No NA
❑
NF
RPnrnds and Doctor entr
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
❑
20-Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weathercnde?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspectors after> 1 inch rentall8 monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rein gauge?
❑
N ❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility bail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
❑
24. Did the reality fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑ N
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E 110
Page: 4

Permit: AW5250038 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number:
250038
Inspection Data: 07I132005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and nnnnmentn
2T Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous lass assessment (PLAT) certification?
Yes
13
Vcc
Nn
0
No
NA
0
NA
NF
NIP
Other Issue,
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
M
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to proiee ly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those mortality
O
M
rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality wncem? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality
O
0
representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional Di of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
0
33, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0
❑
Page: 5

�. Facility Number 25 38 Dateof Visit 9-12-200a Time 8W Printed on: 8182000
1 O Not Operational O Below Threshold
0 Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Abm-e Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Malta.HM.Earm............................................................................................. County: cr.ayea .............................. WARO........
Owner Name: Canoe .................................... Junta ..................................................... Phone No: 25Z-.Z4.4.-14QZ ..........................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: 6305.River.Rd. ................................................. Van clan..dC.............._............................_...... 2852fi .............
Onsite Representative:..Carsonda¢ea........................... ....................__........................... Integrator: Murphy.Eandly.Farmt............. .......................
Certified Operator: W,acre¢,C............................. Junta .............................. ............... .... Operator Certification Number:.16,33.Q.............................
Location of Farm:
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entranceis located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approrfmately ' I
2 miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. Access road is adjacent to Mr. Jones' home. j
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle []Horse Latitude 35 • 15 30 longitude 77 13 00
Design Current
Swine Capacity -Population
® Wean to Feeder
2640
2698
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow, to Wem
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ cats
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry capacity Popelation Cale Capacity Population
❑ Laver ❑Dais'
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non Ouv
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 2,640
Total SSLW
Number of lagoons. ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagam Area ❑ Spray Field Area
- Holding Ponds I Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
1. Is my discharge observed from any, part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ other
a. If discharge is observed. ryas the was en mcc ram -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Stale'! (Ifyes, notih DWQ) Yes ❑ No
c. 11 discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d, Dews discharge bypass a tagewn system° (If yes, nolify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from my, parr of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were: Were my adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of We State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (frce-board plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structtue 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:.........prttnary.................................................................
..... ........... .............................. ........................................ ...................................
Freeboard(inches): ................................. ... ... - ................. ............................................................................................................

5100
Continued nn back
Facility Number: 25738 Date of Inspection 7-12-2000 Printed on: 8/8/2000
5.
Are there any hnmedialc threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? fe/ trees, severe erosion,
Yes
® No
seepage, etc.)
6.
Are them structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closureplan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 46 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7.
Do any of the structures need maimevanaJimprovemera?
❑ Yes
®No
8.
hoes any part of The waste management sysiwn other than waste structures require maintemace/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
9.
Do any sluctums lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
ON.
Waste Annlication
10.
Are them my bWfem that nocd mainloumce/improvement?
❑ Yes
® NO
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pending ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
11
Crop type Coastal Bermuda (I lay) Small Gain Overseed
13.
Ito the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14.
a) Dees the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is petaled for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvemeal?
❑ Yes
®No
16.
Is then; a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
Reunited Records & Documents
IT
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Peanut readily available?
❑ Yes
ON.
I&
Does the facility fail to have all componeuL of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, desigq maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? fie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample mporls)
® Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with too, applicable setback criteria in mike at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively terrified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? -
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewhi spmlion with mrsitc representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24.
Dees facility require a follow-up visit be same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
'
�No biolatibos or,deficiencies were: noted.during this Osit.. You will; receive no further; ;
co]•resoondence about this visit _ .. . . . _ ... .... ......
.
Comments (refer to question 9): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to Better explain situations. (use additional pages as occessary):
• Kccping lagoon level records as required by permit
• Last waste analysis dated 5-24-00 at 1.4 Ibs/1000 gal. Previous report dated 3-6-00 at 1.7 Ibs/1000 gal.
• Last soils report dated 3-6-00 with up to 1.6 T/acre time needed - time applied on 6.20-00 at L5'1'/acre with receipt available
• Waste plan revised 8-25-97 with an overall PAN deficit of 17 lbs. Plan has 2.4 acres in had 1 and 2.2 acres in field 2. For IRR2
iecoNs. Mr. Carson uses 1.84 acres in field I and 2.24 acres for field 2. Map does delineate out 25 R. setbacks. Have technical specialist
te-examine plan to determine correct acreage to be used for records. No back-up information available for solid set which Mr. Cana m
Continue effort to re-establish grass on dike wall
Name

Reviewcdlnspmtor Signature: Date: 5100
Facility Number. 25-3R Date of Inspection 7-12-2W0 Printed on: 8/8/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement budding to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes ® No
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building machine, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fans) noted? (i.e. broken fan bells-, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feud storage bins fad to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes ® No
32. IM the tlush tanks lack a submerged till pipe or a perms curlemporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
. Need to adjust IRR2 to current waste analysis for May and Jane pumping. Used 1.7 but nulled to use 1.4 IbsQOW gal. for waste
alysis - correction will allow more irrigation based on PAN.
Following Hurricane Floyd, Carl Dunn with DWQ requested Mr. Carson kmp pumping volumes for inundated structure. Infonnah
contained in lagoon level records.
Can remove tarps from flush tanks since not required (having problems with material tangling with cams)

(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection Oa Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Oa Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 25 38 Date of Knit. 2/2021101 Time: fl:30 Printed an: 6/52001
10 Not Operational 0Below Threshold
❑ Permitted R CerlTed [3 Conditionally Certified Q Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Iklpae.kDB.Farm................................................ ........................... Count.: craren........................... .......... ......... WdR,Q.......
Owner Name: Carnal ........_......................... Jon" ............................................................ Phone No:=-.24.4,1.40Z ..........................................................
Mailing Address: 6J05.Rixer.Rd..................... .................................. .................. Vaneehon-NC......... ............................. .............. Z8586 .............
FaciahContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsile Representathe:.Casdam,Joaes................................. ............... Integrator: A111.rphy.F.anvil-F.aIID9......................................
Certified Operator:\1,'arma.................................. Jxmea................................................. Operator Certification Number: 103.A............................
Location of Farm:
Farm is boated oR NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately
2 miks west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. Access road is adjacent to Mr. Jones' home.
R Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • I5 30 Longitude 77 • 13 00
cvvi
R Wean to Feeder
2640
2600
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
0 Other
Total Design Capacity 2,640
Total SSLW 79,200
;J0 Subsurface Drains Present
Discharges &. Stream Impacts
1. Is my discharge observed from my part of the operation?
Dischsa'ge originated gC ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a Ifdischarge is obsened, was the convevmee man-made?
b. It discharge is ob,crvuL did it reach Water of the Sure'! (Ifycs, uotify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is Ore estimated flow in ga finin?
d. Does dischargc bypass a lagoon sv.,tcrn'f (If vex, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any parr of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge
Waste Collection & Treatment
4_ Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spill" av
Structure Shvotnm2 Structure Structure Sri ucture5
Identifier: .......... pumary.........................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ._ ....................... ................_........... ............................................. ....... ...__................... ....
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
R No
Yes
R No
❑ Yes
R No
Slrncture 6
....................................

05/03/07
Continued
Date of Inspection 2/20/2001 printed on; 6/52001
Facility Number: 25-38
5. Are Were am, immediate threats to the integrity of my of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion.
El Yes
M No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are Were structures on -site which arc not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6was answered yes, and the situation poses an
❑ Yes
M No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DW Q)
7. Jo anc of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvemmi?
❑ Yes
M No
9. Do airy stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and maintain liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
N No
Waste Application
10. Are there my buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
M No
11. Is there evidence of over apphcatioul ❑ Pseasive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ hydraulic OvcTIoad
❑ Yes
M No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (I lay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
M No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) hoes the facility need a wetable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) this facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Dees the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
M No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
M No
Required
Records & Documents
17,
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Perrin readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps. etc.)
❑ Yes
ON.
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
M No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effeet at the time of design?
❑ Yes
M No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively writhed operator in charge?
❑ Yes
M No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23.
Did Reviewer/)ospector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
M No
24.
toes facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
0
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Field Copy LI Final Notes
* Mr. Jones in process of writing for ('reneral Permit. Paperwork has been sent to Raleigh.
• Waste analysis dated 9/14/00. Sample #2288 nitrogen is 1.3 Ibs/1000 gallons. Analysis dated 5/24/00 and sample #2288 nitrogen was L4
Ibs/1000 gallons.
• New waste sample taken on 2/15/00. No results. Need to rebalance IRR2 for smallgraiu when results are reccived.
• Soil test dated 5/26/00. Lime applied at recommended rates with receipts on file.
• Remember to take soil test for 2001.
• lagoon level being recorded weekly in preparation for General Permit.
• MR2 records are balanced.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Martin Mel.awhorh -f entered by Della Robbins" f
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

(Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit g Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date. of Visit: 1V3028110 Time: 8:80
Facility Number 25 38�
Q Not Operational O Belpw Threshold
0 Permitted M Certified E3 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: Mass.Hill.Farm............................................................................................ Counry': Cxatleix...._........................................ W.ARO.......
Owner Name: Carspa.................................... JORCA................................. ......................... . Phone No: MZ-14.4-1.401 .............................................
Facility Contact .............. ................................. ............................. .Title:
Mailing Address. 6305.1kh'cr.Rd........................
Onsite Representathe:.Carson.Janes......._..........................................
Certified Operator: Warren_ ............................... Janes.. ....................
Ineation of Farm:
Phone No:
Vancebom..NC.................................................... Milk .............
Integrator: Murphy.F.aadly.Farms.....................................
Operator Certification Number: 16330.......... ...................
7arm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately _•
t miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. Access mad is adjacent to Mr. Jones' home.
®Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 15 30 L,nghude 1 77 13 F L 00 1`
Design-<- Current ! Design. Current - Design Current
r wu
MWe=toFeeder
2640s
2570
❑ Feaster to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow'to Feeder
❑ Farrow' to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Roars
Poultry Capacity Population _ Cattle Capacity Po ulatmn
❑ Later I I y
❑ Nov -Laver I❑ Nou-Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 2,640
Total SSLW 79,200
Number of"goom r�
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is my discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Ficld ❑ Other
a. If dischnrge is observed. teas the coovevauae mnn-madu?
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Warta ofihe State? (If yes, aoiify DWQ)
c. If discharge is obsen'ed. Ghat is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a henna systenil(Ifycs. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence ofpa't discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the Stale other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (F c board plus storm storage) less than adequate? D Spillway
Suactuue1 Stmenne2 Sri ucmre3 Shucnue4 Structure5
Identifier: ...................._.............
Freeboard (inches): ............... 3K...............
s Feld Area
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes M No
Structure 6

5100
Continued on back
Facility Number: 25-38 Datcof lnapection 11/30/2000
5. Are there an_v immediate threats to the integriy of am, of the structures observed? (ie/ trees severe erosion,
Yes
®No
seepage. etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
®No
(If any of questions 4-6was answered yes, and the actuation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do am' of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
& Does onv part of the waste management system other than waste structures require, maintenance/impros cmtent?
❑ Yes
®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
®No
Waste Anulic:rtion
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvemcm?
❑ Yes
®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pointing ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
®No
12. Crop type Bermuda Small Gain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
®No
14, a) hoes the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is peaded for a wettable new determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
Rcouirvd Records & Doeumenta
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & (eueral Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
®No
18,
Does the facility fail to have a0 components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan madily available?
fie/ W UP. checklists. design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
19,
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with my applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22,
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑Yes
®No
oc/ discharge, freeboard problems. over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
No violations or"deClcieucies were,noted,during this visit. You will receive no further_ -�-
corresnoodence about this visit.' -
ReviewerMspector Name--

(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection 0Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Oa Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ?-12-21100 Time 800
Facility Number 25 3S
Q Not operational O Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: Mass.][11M.F.Arm..........................................................................................._ County: C=xen .............................................. Wt1R.0.......
Owner Name: CAnom,.......................... Jones ............................................................ Phone No: 252:29:A:.19.Q2..........................................................
FacilityContact: ........................................................................... Title: .......................... .._............................... . Phone No: .............. .....................................
Mailing Address: 6305.Riyxr.Rd...................................................................................... Vancebom-NC.................................................... Z8556 .............
Omile Representaliye:.Carson.Jones................. ......................... .................................. Integrator: Maephy-Family-Farms...................... ...............
Certified Operator:.Macren.0............................. Jones ............................. ................... Operator Certification Number: .16330.............................
Location of Farm: _
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern aide of NCSR 1400 approximately
2 miles went of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. Access road is adjacent W Mr. Jones' home.
5dSwine ❑ Poultry ❑ Came ❑ horse Latitude 35 • 15 30 Longitude 77 13 00
Swine
o Finish
m Wean
Design
-' Current
Design
Current
�`'
C
Po�ulatio�n
Poultry
Ca acit
Po-ulation
Cattle
2h4I 0
26yg 1
: ❑ I.avc'r
❑ Dairy
0 Other
Total Design. Capacity_ 2,640
Total SSLW 79,200
Aren Lj Sprat Field A
Disch Imes IR Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated aB ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, if discharge e, obsenc L mac the cowevanae man-made° ❑ Yee ❑ No
b. If dr,,chargc isob.ewed- did it reach Water ol'the Statz?(Ifyvs,no1iFv DWQ) OYes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed_ what is the estimated flow in gal/ima?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon ,<'slem? (If yes. notify DUrQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from my part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes M No
Waste Collection d. Treatment
4. is storage capacity (frceboani plus stoma storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes M No
Strucuae I Slmcmre 2 Stmeture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier': ......... .prtmery.......... _...................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches) ............... All— ............ .................................... ............. ..................... ................................. .......... ......... ........._..... ......................................

5100
Continued on baeA
Facility Number: 25-38 Date of Inspection 7-12-2000
5. Are there anv immediate threats to the integrity of my of the structures observed? (w/ trees, severe erosion.
(] Yes
N No
seepage. etc.)
6. Are there structures oa-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
N No
(If any of questions 4-6 n'as answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvrntcm?
❑ Yes
N No
8. Dees any part of the waste managemeat system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
9. Do my stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
N No
W sto Application
10. Are there my buffers that need maintenance/improvemeal?
❑ Yes
N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
Yes
N No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Gain Ovcrsecd
13- Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWWI?
❑ Yes
RN.
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is periled for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18. Dees the facility fail 10 have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
_ ❑ Yes
N No
19. Dees record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, wade analysis & and sample reports)
N Yes
❑ No
20. is facility not in compliance with my applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
N No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems. over application)
23. Did Reviewall.speclor fad to discuss review/inspection with on-sile representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24. Dees facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Were my additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
No violations. or deficiencies were,noted'during this visit. You will: receive' no further:
-
rnrrrsnnndenre nhmrt this visit- .
• Keeping lagoon level records as required by permit _
• Last waste analysis dated 5-24-00 at 1 A Ibs/1000 gal. Previous report dated 3-6-00 at 1.7 11,41000 gal.
• Last soils report dated 3-6-00 with up to 1.6 T/acre lime needed - lime applied on 6.20-00 al 1.5 T/acre with receipt available
• Waste plan revised 8.25-97 with an overall PAN deficit of 17 Ibs. Plan has 2.4 acres in field t and 2.2 acres in field 2. For IRR2
maords. Mr. Carson uses 1.84 acres to field I and 2.24 acres for field 2. Map does delineate out 25 fi. setbacks. lime technical specialist
rc�examine plan to determine correct acreage to be used for records. No back-up information available for solid set which Mr. Carson
installed himself
• Continue efforts to re-establish grass on dike wall
Reviewer/Inspector Name

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5/00
Facility Number. 25-38 Date of lospection 7-12-2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there my dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
2& Is there my evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the Ingram?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fam(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan bells. missing or
or broken than blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fad to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a pernament/tcmporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑Yes ❑No
. Need to adjust IRR2 to current waste analysis for May and June pumping. Used 1.7 but needed to use 1.4 lbs/1000 gal. for waste
aNsis - correction will allow more irrigation based on PAN.
Following Hurricane Floyd. Carl Dunn with DWQ requested Mr. Carson keep pumping volumes for mandated structure. lrtformali
contained in lagoon level records.
Can remove tarps from Dash tanks since not required (having problems with material tangling with cares)

w l'Nph ai4i F. Easley
Gavemor
ME. G. Russ, Jr., Secretary
Depanmem of Environment and Naaoal Rescumea
Ken T. Stevens
Division of Wotw Oualay
To: Producer
From: Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Subject Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2001
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced
facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Wane Management Plan and
the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
q' The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a mini num,
maximum waste level far waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm even plus an additional foot of stmctmal freeboard-
9 An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of applmflon as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application- This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
W Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
q' The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wastersoil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility ownedmanager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years
W Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CA WMP. In no case shall land awfication rates exceed the Plant
—_-- ----AvailableMitrm r(PANhatefmtheTeceivineaowmresuhvrro.offdmin)znnveivmaonlimtion. ---
m All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent pending or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization strucnre, or other suitable outlets.
m It is suggested nor a reouirmnont un keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan.
You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systan (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at252-946.
6481, e t 321 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: aR0
DBC Files
943Wmhington Square Mall Washington,NC27889 252-9466461(Telephone) 252-946-9215(Fax)

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O OperaAon Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ DeniedAccess
Facility Number 25 38 �Dweef Visit: 65-2001 Tine: 11A0 am Prinledon: 722001
0 Not Operational O Relow Threshold
M Permitted M Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Mona.1111I.Patm.._....................................... ............... County: Crayea..... ..... ................................... W.9.RQ......
Owner Name: Cansoa...... _........................... Jones .................... ............... - ................... _. Phone No: 251,24=41.401 ..........................................................
Maflfng Address: 630S.Rorer.Rd..... _.... _.................... -..... ......... _... ......... .................. Y.ancebora..NC....... _........ _._.............................. 2H59k..-.........
Facifin' Contact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No: ........................................ _.........
Onsite Representatn e:.CarsumAxines........ _.................................................................... Integrator: MuiAIU:F.amffY.F.arms.....................................
Certified Operator: W.Arlen............... _................. Jonas .............. .... .................... _........ Operator Certification Number: 1bd3.Q._.........................
.
Location of Farm:
Farm u located oft NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately
2 :ilea west of the Intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. Access road is adjacent to Mr. Jones' home.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F 35 15 30 Longitude 77 13 00
-111
Area iLJ Spray
No
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon 0 Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is obsened, was the conveyance mau-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notify DWQ
e. If discharge is obscrved. what is the estimated flow, in aeVmm?
d. Does discharge bvpass a lagoon system? (Ifyes, uolifiDWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge loom any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Suucnue 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Ideulifiec....................................
Freeboard ('inches):...............29...............
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes M No
❑Yes MNo
❑ Yes M No
Structure 6

05103101
c.prmmueu
Facility Number. 25-38 Date of Inspection 6-5-2001 Printed on: 7/22001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
H No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6was answered yea, and the situation poses an
❑ Yes
H No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenanoc/improvement?
❑ Yes
H No
8. Does my part of the waste management system other than waste structures require mamicriance/improvemert? -
❑ Yes
H No
9. Do any structures lack adequate, ganged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
H No
Waste Application
10. Are there say buffers that need mainienance5mprovement7
❑ Yes
H No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pending ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
H No
12, Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Crain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
H No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is paraded for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
H No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
H No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
ON.
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WIIP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
H No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
ONO
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
H No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
H No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
H No
23. Did Review"Anspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
H No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
H No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
ONO
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
uke analysis - 4116/01, 2.4 Ibs./1000 gals.
0 analysis 5/2000 - lime tickets on file.
aboard levels maintained poet requirements of CAWMP.
Applied for General Permit 4/2001.
ReviewerRospector Name Diibne BX llum,-
Reviewer/faspectorSignatura} �Date: '7 — is—OI

1
05103101 Continued
Facility Number. 25-38 Date of Inspection 6-52001
Printed on: =001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (Le. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fans) noted? (i.e. broken in belts, missing or
in broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permauent/temponry cover?
❑Yes ❑No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ❑ No

Facility Number 25 38 Date of Vhip 1//3021100 Time: 9:00 Printed on: 11/30/2000
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
0 Permitted ■ Certified 0 Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ........................
Farm Name: 1faassiRiA1.FArm............................................................................................. County: CLAYRB.............................................. W. ARQ.......
OwnerName: Ca[SAA.................................... Joues............... ............................................. Phone No: 2S2..144-.14Q2............................... _..........................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:.........................................._.................... Phone No: ...................................................
MailingAddress: 6J.O5.Rizcr.Rd...................................................................................... Y.eacchgra...NC....................... ............................. 20.586 .............
Onsite Representalive:.CW.Qa.J.Qacg.............................................................................. Integrator: DAuIphy...F.aW.11y..F.adaS........... ..........................
Certified Operator:kyarrea..._............................. Jtlack ................................................. Operator Certification Number:1(63.3O .............................
Location of Farm:
entrance is located on
approximately 2 miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. Access road is adjacent to Mr. Jones' .
® Swine O Poultry ❑ CatOe []Home Latitude 35 • 15 30 Longitude 77 • 13 00
O Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Drgn
Ca tacit
2640
Current Desrgn Currenf Design Current
sPo `ulation ' Poultry ;, YCaparity Po Matron Eagle Ga aci Eo ulation
1 2570 1210 Layer I I IM10 Dairy
I Non Layer I 1 11110 Non -Dairy
u
❑ Farrow to Wean
-­ � - F' �
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Feeder
1
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity, 2,640
Total SSLW 79,200
OGilts
❑ Boars
Numb�e�'of Lagoonslj ❑ Subsurface Drains Present J10 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holdmg Ponds Sp ldld T ,_,raps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management S stem
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. Ifdischarge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Ifdischarge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes ❑ No
c. Ifdischarge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Ifyes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? O Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:..._ ................
Freeboard (inches): 38

5100
Continued on back
Facility Number: 25-38 Date of Inspection 11/30/2000 Printed on: 11/30/2000
5.
Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
D Yes
®No
seepage, etc.)
6.
Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
8.
Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
9.
Do any soutures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
OR No
Waste Application
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
It.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pending ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
®No
12.
Crop type Bermuda Small Grain
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
®No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
D No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
®No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
®No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
D Yes
®No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit: You will receive no fdrtbeh -
.
earresooudeuce about this visit. -. -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall

Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: S/001
Facility Number: 25-38 Date of l nspection Ill30/2000 Printedon; 11/302000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ®No
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, []Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ®No
32. Do the Flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
vnn

0 Division of Water Quality
0 Division or Soil and Water Conservation
-` - 0 Other Agency
Type of Visit a Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Dareuf Visih 11'30-00 I Time: � Printed on: 7/21/2000
0 Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted g Cerifted [3Conditionally Certified E3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ........................
FarmName: .................J.. !.?.a`! .........i�._I................................... ...................................... County:_......_.C'ar✓Cn.............................. ................._.. ........ .
Owner Name: ......................... C.. San ....... .......... )P.:._5........................ I.................... Phone No:
Facility Contact:...........................................—Title:................................................................ Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: ............... ............•.........)_JnCi............ .................... Integrator. ..........._irf
...............
Certified Operator: .............. ^l°Y.:._......... o+Cs..._................_........_....... Operator Certification Nun
Location of Farm: -
❑ Swine []Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Norse Latitude O.Or �•r Longitude O• =r =..
Design
Caoarity
Wean to Feeder
2 6 YO
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Traps
_.-._ Design Current
Poultry Counts,l Population Cattle C
❑ Layer I I ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity L
Total SSLW 1
A.
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑Yes
EgNo
Discharge originated at ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)0
yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If )cs, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pan of the operation?
❑ Yes
®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
4 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
El Yes
Q�No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure h
....._..._..............._..._...................._................................................................
Identifier: ...............3....D'
Freeboard (inches):
5100
Continued
on back

Facility Number: 2S — ,3$ Date of Inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
5.
Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
Yes
Eq No
seepage, etc.)
6.
Are there surmumes on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
Q No
(It any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7.
Do any ofthe structures need marwenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
BNo
8.
Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
8 No
9.
Do any strictures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
fg No
Waste Application
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
f� No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pending ❑ PAN []Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
EJ-No
12.
Crop type S6
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
O No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c)'rhis facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
tgNo
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
Rermired Rnrords & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? -
❑ Yes
E5 No
19.
Does the facility tail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Yes
& No
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
QNo
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
iq No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
E4 No
23.
Did Reviewcr/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative!
❑ Yes
KNo
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
Eallo
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
Callo
'
"d9d *Jib latiutis:or &ficieni:.j were noted during this visit,. You :w.-tll receive fie tilrther
ctirres o deuce.aboufthisvisit::::::::::'::':::': is i:::::::::........ .
Comments (refer to question N): Explainarry YES answers and/or my recommendations or my other comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary)-
Reviewer/Inspector Name tJNn.xV
Reviewer/Insvector Signature: .. inn - _ Date: 1) 30 )) cmn

Facility Number: Dale of I nspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Ineucs
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'?
❑ Yes
J4 No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application'? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
g No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
ERJ No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
❑ Yes
d No
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
4KLNo
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a pertnanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
5/00

Facility Number LJLJ
p Permitted M Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Time of In7iection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
tp Not Operational Date Last Operated:
,,,,, Comdv: Craven WARD
.... Phone No: 252-244-1A02...................................................
.................. ......-................ Phone No: ................
Mailing Address: faMS.Rivand.............................................................................._....... V",,b,,,..NC ..................................................... 28S8b..............
Cousin, Representative:...._......_............... -........................................................................... Integrator:Murphy,.Family.Fauns.....................................
Certified Operator: Warreu.C._......................... Jones .................................................. Operator Certification Number: 1010.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©•©1=11 Longitude ©•©• ®"
Swine Capacity Population Poultry
Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ auy
❑ on- mry
® Weanto Feeder
,❑
❑ ayer
❑ ms ee erto n
on- ayer
❑ arrowto can
- -
❑ arrow to ee er
❑ ter
❑ Farrow to Fmis
_ - - Total W5 i,
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
,neCapacity
ft9amher of Lagoons p5tijWce Drams resent p agoon rca 113 Spray FiewxM
Discharges & Stream Impacts_'
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operanonv ❑ 1'. Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ErOthet-
a If discharge is observed, was the convesanoe man-mzW -- [3 Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, d id it reach Water of the Sta�(iesnofify DWQ) [3 Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal�`n'in?
it. Doesdischarge Pypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)` ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from an) -pan of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment _
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ,❑ Spillway - ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Simqure 2 Structure 3 Svugturt4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................... ........................................_.........._ .......... I....................................................................
Freeboard(inches): .........._ --................... ................................... ........................ .........._..........g_...........
5. Are there any imml threats to the integrity of any of the stracturel observed? (icJ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: 25—JB Date of hispeclion
6.
Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
n No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
n Yes
n No
8.
Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
n No
9.
Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
n No
Waste Annlication
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
n No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding n PAN
n Yes
n No
12.
Crop type
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAW MP)?
n Yes
n No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre deternamalion?
p Yes
n No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
n Yes
n No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
n No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
n Yes
n No
Reunited Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
n Yes
n No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
n Yes
n No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
n Yes
n No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
n Yes
n No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charger
❑ Yes
n No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency .situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) -.
❑ Yes
n No
gpl
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector45ail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
n No
24.
Does facility require&(olhmv up visit by same agency? -
p Yes
p No
25,
Were any. additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? i
❑ Yes
n No

EMERGENCY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
Drafted September 24, 1999
Facility # 25 _ 3i' On -site Representative: Contact#
Date: W 44 Inspector/Reviewer:
Time DLQ/Dam Safety Rep.:
Waste Structures:
1. Structure Integrity (circle one):
Immediate Threat Potential Threat Adequate Other
Comments(does structure need repair/extent of damage, etc.
2. Allowable maximum lagoon level (circle): 3G
Structure failed and is inoperable .
Immediate. Threat - empty immediately
Immediat Potential maximum operating level
(inches from top o dike - must be initialed by DLQ/Dam Safety rep.)
Adequate - may operate at normal levels
3. Storm impact to lagoon (circle applicable category):
Structure inundated
(Information related to length of time submerged, etc)
Flood waters:satu rated outside wall
Estimated distance in inches (ie/36 inches from top):
Structure topped over
(was top of dike cut, etc.)
Flood water on9j om (name of creek, river, etc.)
Circle Basin: Neuse Tar White Oak Roanoke Chowan
4. Date and explanation of remedial action taken after storm:
III

Other Parts of Waste Management System:
Comments (lift station, collection boxes, destroyed houses, etc.)
Waste Application System:
1..Irrigation/application system - comments, assistance needed,
2. System is (circle): Inoperable/destroyed Operable but limited Operable
3. For inoperable systems (circle):
Lost supply lines Lost hardware (reels, pivots, etc.) Lost pump No power sources
Other:
4. What is needed to repair system and length of time needed to bring back on-line?
5. Would a generator fix situation
6. Is pump & haul equipment available?
Land Application Sites:
1. Is field(s) currently Flooded and if yes, what percentage of field(s) Flooded?
2. Fields are saturated but not ponded
3. Are receiving crops available? Yes No
If answered no, estimated time before next crop planted
4. Fields adequate to receive waste
5. Comments - remedial action taken after storm which may have affected spray fields:
6. Are alternative sites or third party land immediately available?

Redotd Keeping:
1. Records were destroyed and in need of reconstruction
2. Records partially complete
3. Records available and complete
4. Date and PAN of last waste analysis
Structure 1: 2: 3: 4: 5:
5. Last lagoon level readings: 1 2 3 4 5 Rainfall Received
Just prior to August 1:
Just prior to August 29:
Just prior to Sept. 15
Immediately after 9/15
Current level
6. Documented volumes pumped from waste structure since Hurricane Floyd:
7. Current animal populations:
Mortality Losses:
1. Number of animals lost:
2. Disposal method used:
3. Does facility lack a means of disposal?
Other comments; unanswered questions, etc.
Use back of sheet for additional comments, sketches, etc.

f❑ Division of Soil and. Water Conservation - Operation Review
1, [3Division ofSoB and Water Conservation- Compliance Inspection
® Division of Water Quality - Complianee Inspection
- 0 Other Ageucv - Operation Review
140 Routine O Complaint O Folios.-un of DWQ inspection O Follow-un o(DSWC n•ciesv
F.611ty Number 25 38 Date of Onpection
�-- rime of In.'la-mnn
D Permitted M Certified CouditioualhCertified et Registered 5 Not O erationnl
Farm Name: h1Uaa.Hill.Earm............................._.........................................................._.. Count.': Crm:o
24 hr. (hh:mm)
Date Last Operated:
WARO.......
Owner Name: Car spn......................... Junes........_._ ....... .......................... ..._......... Phone No: 2 Z29d J.1UZ............................_......_.._...._..........
Facifits' ContaeL................................_.................................._........Till,:................................................................ Phone No:
Mailing Address: 630S.Ricer.Rd.................. -.... Yaumboru..NC....................._.........._.................. U5H6_...._......
OnOte Representative:
Intesralor: M10b.N.Yaodly.Farms.................... .............. _.
Certified Operator:.W.arren_G.... ._........_.......... shmeS....... ............ Operator Cer ifieation Number: 16.330.............................
Location of Farm:
�Farmis.located.nD'.1YCSR.LiQQia.Craven.Cunnq..F.arm.entrance.is.lea:�ted.un.the.spnAhern.side.nf_NCSB.1900.appmvmateli:.
�1.milessvest.nt.the. i�m.`arriun.between.NCSB.14D0andNCSR1493_..Access.ruad.is.adAarcnt.to.111r .Junes.Itoma............................'
Latitude 35 0. 15 30 Longitude 77 13 00
Swine Capacity Population Poultry
®Wean to Feeder 2640
2419
❑ Pecdcr to Finish
❑ Fw to Wean
❑ Farroarrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
II] Gilts
❑ Boa
Number of Lagoons
Holding Pands / Solid Traps
Cattle Ca acits ' Population
Dais
ILI Non -Dairy I
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
1 2,640 1
Discbor,• S Swam lmm'rl
1. Is avv discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Di •c-^i_e ' ::.. "Lagoon^! Sprav Field ❑ Other
a_ !f disvhargc ie obscn �al. seas We cousec:mcc mac -made"
:. if u�sc'bs <n":' mod_ did h raid' Pcnr o;' the qaa (lf-•s. vouni sVQ)
c. Lf di-hnrge is ob,-n, ec. rrLai , the eaintmu! 1!ory un �aLmni'
d Doc_<discharge bvpaas a iagonn �'aem? (If ves. nolil`r i lCs Ql
2. Is there esidence of past discharge from am part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State otber than from a discharge?
Waste Collection A Treatment
4. Is storage capacity' (freeboard plus storm storage) less Wan adequate? ❑ Spillwa7
Stmcmre 1 Slrucmrc ^_ Suuctwe 3 Stmcttue 4 Snvwure 5
Ideutiher:....................................
Frechoard 1 i .Ia,). ........... -.3A::......_......
5. Are Were any immediate threats to We integrity of am of the structures observed? 0& trees. severe emsiov.
an:/U9 seepage. etc.)
❑ Yes
$ No
❑ Yes
$ No
❑ Yes
g1 No
n/a
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
EI No
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ Yes
g No
Sm¢tua 6
...............................
...............................
, IYes
Z No
C.mirrurd na hack

/ FwHity Number: 25-38 Del, of I.,p,t ion V-99
6. Are there structures on,ite which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes 0, No
(H any of questions 4-6 was answered res, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No
8. Does ivy part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ON.
9. Do any smctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid Imol
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Wane. Anrdwa6on
10.
11.
12.
Are there any bulfexs that need maintenance/improvement?
Is there evidcnee of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
Crop hype Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Gain oversced
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
®No
ON.
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)?
❑ Yes
®No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facilm, need a wellable acre determination?
❑ Yes
®No
c) Tins facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
Required Records & Dacn menu
IT
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
®No
I &
Does the faciliy, fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps. etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation. freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
@ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
Z No
21.
Did the facility- fail to have a activeh' certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notif}'regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge. freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Z No
24.
Does faciliy, require a follow-up visit by same agencv?
❑ Yes
g No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A VRAP?
❑ Yes
Z No
No violations ordefr6encies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further
-comesuondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or anv recommendations or any other comments.. - Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): -
ecards wadable for revien'.
Waste, and and freeboard records are up to date.
Plan to errand bale the oils as soon as it dries out.
avo & Associates designed the waste management system and the WUP was written in accordance to this design,
Practice weed coutrel in spmyfields and on dike wall upon need.
Continue von efforts to establish, egetation on dike wall.
If you alive anv questions, please contact me at 252-946-6481. ext. 318.
Lyn B. Hardison
A
Date: 5_fF_9�

a _ i] Division of Soil and Water Conservation Operation Review
i] Division of Soil and Water Conservation Compliance Inspection
® Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
i] Other. Agency - Operation Review
Facility Number 2$ 3 Date of Inspection
,,, 'Time o1' Inspection ©1A hr. (hh:mm)
i] Permitted is Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered 0 Not O endional Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ............IrS/OI`J�.`..._,l,}:._11....._FLM�.Y..._.... _.................._...._........................ Counh:.......L�!r:S.................._.............. ....G."(t:.L.r.Q.
Owner Name: .............. ............ ............... ................ .............. Phone No:......,rr'...tJ.._Z.�._.L...Yr.4.:.-_I `fd 2-
..................................
FacilityContact:.._..._......._....._...._.....y................._..... ../.I.............Title:..... ...._..._.._....._.......I..._........................ Phone No: .......................... ..._..p...._....../_..
Mailing Address: ......�¢.-3�._5 L,1.g'L..C........05............................................. .....11Q..i9.Ci!.._.. ........... ..��.../1..-�..�l.Y.'...
Onsilc Representative: f. ............. ._._.._...._..._..._...._......._.._ Integrator. ....M.UlI.:R 1, (.. �?u!::!.. i JI.....................
........
s Certified Operator:....... ..._ .A:VY y`V G..... ......J.rMC-i.............................. Operator Certification Number: ........./.4...1�..-�l...Q.........
...........
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude o•o`o"
Swine Cat itv Population
® Wean to Feeder
q
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
gn -a'..
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
I Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste, anagement System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any pan of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. if discharge is observed. what is the esGntated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon syslem'r
1 is there evidence of past discharge from any pan of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment t
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm Storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Strucmrc 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): -30
❑ Yes E] No
❑ Yes ONo
Ej Yes -No
ei, ii
❑ Yes rfN0
[]Yes Ig No
❑ Yes E4No
El Yes 0No
Structure 6
1 /6/99
Continued on back

Facility Number: a S _ 3B Date of Inspection
5. Are there anv immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion. El Yes 9 No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures ou-site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes B.No
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maimcnance/improvemem) ❑ Yes I? No
8. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvcment? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markets with required top of thke, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? []Yes 9No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need mnintenancefimprovcmem7 ❑ Yes 2-No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Ponding []Nitrogen ❑Yes gNo
12. crop type .....&�-t�o� ""7 �,.�..P:t.�.......:,>
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes®No
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment!
Required Records & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
I & Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WOP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample repons)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes F2'o
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes E�(No
❑ Yes EXNo
❑ Yes JRNo
❑ Yes ONo
❑Yes 12 No
[:]Yes B No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes [,No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 2-No
�Nn.viulationrtir. deb iciencies .w:ere nu6ed during ttiisvisit:. You wilLrecerve no further•
etirrespixidence:abbuf this visi.E.: : :
Comments (refer to question p): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any otter connote s.
Use drawingsof facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): i
(lt,efh..Qg QNd.t..V1E1G 1-a-+ rtVi Cut pp ��.
lva41-t r $e; 1 a—k (aapon 4- eCCt l.(i
ctt* o ba.l-e r-rp 41-4
Move � ,4sso�,°a�5 sur`ve,t�e6� -I- �C',y�'-�� �-i I`+y `• ) r,-I�c�.v., bqs�
P(n a c cc eta. `zJ, z's al.
-
Cdwc f -A, . d le r s a vctZc� �p�k.� c vaPll.
Name L h �S: l,%� J-la,-d!Iso,_
Signature: Al*") Date: 1/6/99

_,❑,,Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
�tvision of Water Quality '
online 0 Cum lain! O Follow-u of IM ins ection O Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number —� Date of Inspection q- O
Time of [myection®24 he (hh:mm)
0 Registered CWertified 0 Applied for
Permit 0 Permitted 0 Not Operant .. I Dale Last Operated
Farm Name: ............... Q.b.S.....'K�..�.1.....__CCxsaM.......... ................................. County: .....(2r . ! +.tom
_ ......................................
Owner Name: ............
ew—so.h._..........
_...._TIfa.A.:.-.......................................
Phone No: .} .......r .�.ili. "..._�..�i: s........._.....
FacilityContact: .......................
Title:................................................................
Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:
!�
O 4'�2,Jt� (�............._...................
.L.3.....5................. ............K.dl.....
..... /CA..Uk ...4.Rd].........I_!):!_G......
V ...ee
Onsite Representativr'.,.....�\.LC:L`n.
at1.....s?.4..
e__........................................
Integrator: ....1)ks�..
Certified Operator:.._<1.1..SS-Ky.:Z.a✓`.:._C'
.�O+s.Z.6
Operator Certification Number:.....1.6.*350........-.
Location of Farm:
Latitude F,�S'.r 17E;71' �I' Longitude _ 17 • ©' ®"
is .Design Current Design Current ' . Design Current
:Swine- - `Catiacily Population Poultry ` Canacity Population -,. Cattle "Cauacilv.Pdntilalion
&KWeautoFeeder
16LAD
260_
❑ Layer
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Farrow to Wean
'
❑ Other
❑ Farrow, to Feeder
Total Desi
- -
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
-
;n Capacity F7
`
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
G'K
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
0 Yes
tNN/O
o
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
0 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Bow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
�0�,,
I>rtvo
4. Were them any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
6' N//o
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
El Yes
&K.
maimcnance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
0 Yes
--//
itd N�o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
0 Yes
;Z
7/25197
Continued on back

Facility Numbera5 -
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to he properly closed?
Structures (LAPooms.Ituldtua Ponds. Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Freeboard ffq:.._......4o...iY1... ...............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes L13l;-o-
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes I�d NNo
❑ Yes ,O NNo
❑ Yes tyrvo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
ElYes
����
QNo
Waste Application
14.
Is then; physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
No
(If in excess of (WNW, or runoff
Qentering waters of the State, notify DWQ) p n n
(�\)
15.
Crop type .......1.. .S:tG.k._C:.1fMt.�N6�Sl:......................................... N..fR:.Y.:1'., C.1 xl..Cga.tJw..z.5?,
.J....._..._..........,.,�.......�............
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
NNo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
,G3
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
,^�o
19.
Is them a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
,p..d6
Ga' 'o
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail m discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�0�'5'o
9—</
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
El Yes
1rd"No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
1�
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMPI
❑ Yes
EkKo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
correspondence about this. visit. ' ' . ..... .. ... .... ......
W aUa ra,s 3I9S , S�Lt_ ontl a quo�Jh
�;I �-na4y�3vU,s 4I`I@; 54-'Eine��- l:u�-e_. feesV_:ei� �su V.ezP coP�9w�
I .Qvtnnv(>V1COL
Akolq%or NoueX 'tin erzv;ous ;nsQe`1•�on�6petio�-son ev;eJ
1-'Z,1I14c-tg o,ti. ouena e-,X
15-c%rrcfZdL Pld_w No-Cd15_w GoPW(�p� �uc�oo.� No t;cav\,jC0..9 P-J�Q�1tl .V.fa25�97 _
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: - L� , t) - uu.Mllp _ Date: Cl - 56 -

Facility Number [f® I Date of mspecnon o/� 12/98
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered 0 Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted p of perahona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Moss..dMF.arm............................................................................................. County: Craven WARO
Owner Name: Carson ................................... Jones ........................................................... Phone No: 9.1%244-A.402 ..........................................................
Facility Contact:.Carsaa.Janes..................................................Title: owner.................................................. Phone No: 252tZ44-1.401 .......................
MailingAddress: 6305.Riwer.W............................_......................................................... Ymcebara-KC .................................................... 2858b..............
Onsite Representative: Carson.Jmfes,.Jeff.Jones,.Tommic Sta100gs.............. Integmtor:Murphy..F.Andly.Faraix .....................................
Certified Operator: Warr.an.C_........................... Jones.................................................. Operator Certification Number: 16330 ............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©a ©• =- Longitude ©• ©1 =11
¢sign-,.
Swfne �' Capacity=l'opuladtin
_ urreo ,:. - esign— urren Design, urren —
Poultry =` Capacity Population "Cattle Ciipaaty` Population
t
Feeder
Weanjto�E.er
p Layer
i
pf any
e
_,
p Non -Layer
II on- atry
arro
= _ - - _
er {
arro
�,...
= - Total Design Capactty
Farro
- i
Gilts
-
Total SSLW®:.
Boars
Numberof Lagoons/1loldfng
Ponds Subsurface rains Present13goon rer 13pray m rea
-x, -
:
"'- II No Liquid Waste Managemen ys era
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
13 Yes
®No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
p Yes
® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
p Yes
p No
b. If -discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ)
p Yes
p No
c. If dischmge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
p Yes
13 No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any partof the operation?
p Yes
®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
p Yes
®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
O Yes
®No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
p Yes
® No
725/97

et i. um r: 2 _38 Date of Inspection
8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
® No
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
O Yes
® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: ...............#.L..................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (it): 2.5
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
O Yes
® No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
O Yes
® No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
® No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
® Yes
p No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type......Coastal.Bermuda.@ay)..............Small gram.averseed.......................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
0 Yes
® No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
O Yes
® No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
13 Yes
® No
19.
is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
0 Yes
®No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
®No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
®No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
p Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No

Division of Water Quality
�--77��--�-1�� II----��f�--�� L
Facility Number Date of InspectionL=:JZJ
Time of Inspection � 24 he (hh:mm)
p Registered 0 Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted p o perahona Dale Last Operated:
Farm Name: MossiJBI Farm............................................................................................. County: Craven WARD
Owner Name: Carson ................................... Jones........................................................... Phone No: 9.19l:244-1402 ..........................................................
FacilityContact: ............................................................................... Title: .........................
Mailing Address: 011S.River.Rd.......................................................................................
Onsile Representative: Carsoa.Junes.............................................................................
Certified Operator: Warrea.C............................... Jones..................................................
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
28586..............
Integrator: Murphy.Family.Farms.....................................
Operator Certification Number: MOM ............................
Latitude ©a©' ®- Longitude ©a ©1 ®u
Swine
eslgn Curren
Capacity Population
mign -urren esrgn urren
Poultry Capaeity�Population Cattle Capacity Pop�latim
13 Layer p auy
Wean to Feeder
2640
2600
13 Feeder to Finish
10 on- ayer
13 Furrow on Wean
+us a a•
13 Omer
talSDesign Capacity
Tota1�SSLW
13 arrow to Feeder
13 arrow M kmish
13 Gilts
13 Boars
Numher ottLaa Holdingl$onds F---r--Jl p Subsurface Drains resen p Ugom Are. II Spray Pield Are!j
p o tqm as a anagemen ys era
uenerel
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
®No
2. Is my discharge observed from any part of the operation?
r3 Yes
®No
Discharge originated at 13 Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
p Yes
p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
p Yes
p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
p Yes
p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from my part of the operation?
p Yes
®No
4. Were there my adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
p Yes
®No
5. Does my part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
p Yes
®No
maimmmance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with my applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
O Yes
®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
13 Yes
®No
7/25/97

IF acuity um r: 25_38
8.
Art them ligoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
® No
Structures (Latoons,Holdom Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus stomt storage) less than adequate?
[3 Yes
® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (ft): 2.5
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats m the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12.
Do any of the structures need maimeaance/improvement?
® Yes
p No
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
® No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ......Coastal$ermuda.Grass.......................................................................................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
p Yes
®No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
O Yes
®No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
® Yes
p No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
®No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
® Yes
p No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
®No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
®No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number E��
Time of Inspection ®24 hr.(hh:mm)
p Registered g Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted G of pera[tona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Moss.11iLLF.arm.............. .................................. ............................................. County: Craven WARD
Owner Name: Carson ................................... James ........................................................... Phone No: 919.-244-1402...................................... -..................
FacilityContact: ................ ..................... ........................................ Title: ............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: 63115.1tiverRit........................................................................................Y.ancelmrst-NC..................................................... 2858b..............
Onsite Representative: Carsom buiec............................................................................. Integrator:Murphy-F.amily.Earms......................................
Certified Operatir:W. mr.n.CC........................... Jones ........_......._............................... . Operator Certification Number: lf330.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©•©• ®" Longitude ©• ©1 ®«
- rgn urreo
Swine Capacity Population
es�gn Design Lurren
Poultry Gapacigpulabon Cattle Capacity Population
. ® Weam to Feeder
13 er
ayon-
p auy T�
p ee er to mts
p ayer
_F3 Other
p on- airy
p avow to can
'!y
I „
E3arrow to ee er
p arrow to Fmts
Tofalibesign Capacity
13 Gilts
p Boars
- Tota1.SSLW
Numbegofila lRa1� dQgIP ds �1O Subsurface Drains resen O Lagoon Area III Spray Field Arco
p No Liquid Waste Managemen ye em
Ue term
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
Ci Yes
N No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
O Yes
N No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
p Yes
N No
b. Ifdischarge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
p Yes
® No
c. Ifdischarge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
Not Applicable
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
E3 Yes
®No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any partof the operation?
p Yes
®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
p Yes
® No
5. Does any part ofthe waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
p Yes
®No
maintenance improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
®No
7. Did the facility fail in have a certified operator in responsible charge?
p Yes
®No
7/25/97

acility Number: 25_3
8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
E3 Yes
® No
Structures (Lasoons,Holdine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
E3 Yes
® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier: ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (ft): 36 in.
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
O Yes
N No
11.
is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
E3 Yes
® No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
E3 No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
® No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
E3 Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type.......Coasta.Bermuda.GlasS.......Stnall.Grain k)YJu atJ3arW............................................................................................................
Mao ppa
to16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated d An al Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
C3 Yes
®No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
E3 Yes
®No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
® No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
E3 Yes
®No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
O Yes
®No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
E3 Yes
® No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
O Yes
®No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
E3 Yes
®No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
p Yes
®No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No
�...v •mr .arse.r.wi .. w...uv.cv.u. . . . .. . . . ... . . . . . ... ... . . muuca .
Ce�Segppp[l¢tie8 abtitiE'tfii3 visi3:::::::::::.....::::::.............. .

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number Ir'LJ
13 Registered E Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
Farm Name: Mos.&H LL.F.arm..........................................................................
Owner Name: Carson ................................... jams.........................................
Facility Contact; ............................................................................... Title:
Mailing Address: 63115.Rixer..Rd...................................................................
Onsite Representative: Mr.lCarsan.dnnes..................................................
Certified Operator: Warren.C............................ JOB" ...............................
.
Location of Farm:
p vmer Agency II
p of DSWC review C Other
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
9'ol`ZTp'cratIonaM Date Last Operated:
County: Craven WARD,
.... Phone No: 919.344.1402..........................................................
.......................................... Phone No:....................................................
......Y.ancebora-ISC..................................................... Z858fi ..............
.... Integrator: Murphy.F.ami(y.Farma.........................
.... Operator Certification Number: 16330 .............................
Latitude ©a©•=- Longitude ©a©1®-
eslgn Curma.
Swioe Capacity Population.
Poultry
mn -urren
Capacity Population Cattle
estgu urrea.
Capacity Population
Wcan to ee er
p ayer
auy
er m mts
: r3 on- ayer
p on- atry
Farrow to Weam
Ia:s.®t++arae�wa
Capacity
TotaliSSLW
arrow [o gee er
Farrow to FinishTokal,De'sign
Gilts
Roars
_,,,dj[130ther
Number LagoonsJiHoldina,P,onds I InSubsurface
o
rams reseo g000 rea
Liquid Waste anagemen ys em
113 Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
®No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
0 Yes
®No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
p Yes
p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify D WQ)
p Yes
p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
0 Yes
p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
p Yes
®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
p Yes
®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
p Yes
®No
maintenance/improvemem?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
O Yes
®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
13 Yes
®No
7/25/97

cr r ma er: 25_38
8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
O Yes
® No
Structures (Laeoons,Holdine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (R: 2.3
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
E3 Yes
® No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
E3 Yes
® No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
® No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
® No
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type Snnfl Gfmvlim(Wheaat,11arley........................................................................................................................................................................
16.
aIM those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (A WMP)?
Do the receiving crops dMrOwj
p Yes
®No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
®No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
r3 Yes
®No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
®No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0 Yes
®No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
13 Yes
®No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
®No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
p Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No
Li. o"o ons.or cmncres:were.note . nng w isvisi:. oar .receivena er.%
:aei'[
Comments (refer to question Explain any YES;aaswers and/or my recommendations or any other comments. -,
se d rings at foci ty. ner;eaplam sduatmos {use additional pages as nedessa6V f? -
h
. Rick Dove re ated a coup aint to
is o ce refemncing that a lagoon had been pumped on onto t8go�dlat either Neuse�#I�2
farm. Mr. Jones met with the Division reps. during the inspection. 1Lerewereno signsVegetative coverohe
dike wall needs some work Mr. Jones believed that the complaint cen from ao individual who hahis.
Jones'teen
acres fo waste disposal and he uses this land for two registered farms (Neuse N 1H2 and--
"tf
Reviewer/Inspector Name aD phnc m u om" . yn a icon f
r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: