Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
250025_HISTORICAL_20171231
NUH I H UAHULINA Department of Environmental Qual HISTORICAL HISTORICAL HISTORICAL ` State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director John Smith 1960 Hill Neck Rd Ernul NC 28527 Dear John Smith; ■ NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL. RESOURCES May 17, 2000 Subject: Rating of Potential Risk Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds John Smith Farm Facility Number 25-25 Craven County During the 1999 session, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law directing the North Carolina Department of Environment of Natural Resources (DENR) to develop an inventory and ranking of all inactive lagoons and storage ponds in the State. In order to meet this directive, a representative of DENR has recently evaluated the inactive lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) on your property. Inactive lagoons and storage ponds were defined by the Statute as structures which were previously used to store animal waste but have not received waste for at least one year. The information collected on your property is contained in the attached field data sheets. Using this field data, staff ranked your inactive waste structures as high, medium or low according to its potential risk for polluting surface and/or groundwater. Your waste structure(s) was ranked as follows: Structure Number Surface Area (Acres) Ranking 1 0.46 Medium This ranking is based in part on the conditions existing on the day of the site visit. Changes in these conditions or the collection and evaluation of additional data may modify the ranking of your waste structure(s) in the future. Information on your facility along with over 1000 others contained in the inventory has been provided to the General Assembly. During this year's session, the General Assembly will consider additional requirements for future management of these structures which may include requiring proper closure of inactive lagoons and storage ponds according to current or alternative standards. 943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27989 Teiephone (252) 946-6481 Fax (252) 946-9215 An Equal opportunity Afiuwative Action Employer 50% recycled/10°% post -consumer paper Rating of Potential Risk t Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds Animal Waste Management System Page 2 Regardless of their ranking, owners of all waste lagoons and storage ponds have certain management responsibilities. These include taking appropriate actions to eliminate current discharges, prevent future discharges and to insure the stability of their structures. Staff of the Division of Water Quality will be in contact with owners of all inactive structures that have been determined to pose a serious environmental risk, based on its ranking and/or additional field data collected by the Department. All liquids and waste removed from these structures must be land applied at a rate not to exceed the agronomic needs of the receiving crops. Any major modifications made to the dike walls or structure must be done in accordance with current standards and under the direction of a technical specialist designated for structural design. Your local Soil and Water Conservation District is an excellent source for information and guidance related to proper waste application practices, structure operation and maintenance, and other related animal waste management standards and/or requirements. Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility and liability for any past or future discharges from your lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) or for any violations of surface water or groundwater quality standards. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this process. 4f you have questions concerning your inactive structures, please contact the staff of either in the Division of Water Quality or the Division of Soil and Water Conservation in the Washington Regional Office at (252) 946-6481. Sincerely, ROGER THORPE FOR JIM MULLIGAN Jim Mulligan Water Quality Regional Supervisor cc: Craven County Soil and Water Conservation District Office Facility File T Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection D Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit D Routine Q Complaint Q Follow up ❑ Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number 25 25 13 Permitted [3 Certified © Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date of Visit 2J2$12f100 10 Not Operational Q Below Threshold Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: i1.t&............. Farm Name: ,lst 1151161itllt.FAM......................................................................................... County:-CrAYCA................................... ............ WARO....... OwnerName: JRilm..............•---..................... S1w1h......................... ................................ Phone No: 25,Z-2m.. -Q2.4S........................................................... Facility Contact: Title: Phone No: Mailing Address: 19.64.Hi1l.Nc&Its>`.............................................................................. Erxtul.NC ............................. . 2b.57.7............... Onsite Representative:...--........ ... Integrator: Location of Farm: � ssut..nnitics.e .sr7F. n�tul.l'u #.Q i�.n...................................................................................................... ® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Design Current awrare Uapacity ro uiation ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean 1000 0 ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Design Current Design Current Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Layer ❑Dairy ❑ Non -Layer I I Non -Dairy ❑ Other Total Design Capacity 1,000 Total SSLW 433,000 Number of Lagoons Holding Ponds/ Solid Traps Discharges A Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon El Spray Field ❑ Other a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes El No b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min? 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No 3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No Waste Collection & Treatment Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets Reviewer/Inspector Name Martin Mclawhorn L Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Printed on: 5/12/2000 .I ,Facility Number 25 — 25 Lagoon Number 1............ Lagoon Identifier prjrn.a]1....................................... Q Active Q Inactive Latitude 85 14 2i Waste Last Added .1.:.1.-........................................... Longitude 77 F02-1 55 Determined by: ® Owner ❑ Estimated By GPS or Map? ® GPS ❑Map GPS file number: IL022821A Surface Area (acres): QA.Q........................ Embankment Height (feet): 4...................... Distance to Stream: 0 <250 feet Q 250 feet - 100D feet Q >1000 feet By measurement or Map? ❑ Field Measurement ® Map Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes *No Intervening Stream? Q Yes Q No Distance to WS or HOW (miles): Q < 5 D 5 - 10 Q > 1 D Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes # No Q Unknown Spillway O Yes O No Adequate Marker O Yes 4 No Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches): '&I inspection date 2-28-2000 appearance of Q Sludge Near Surface lagoon liquid Q Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored Q Lagoon Liquid Clear Q Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 48.0 embankment condition 0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc. *Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition 0 Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards outside drainage Q Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design Q Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design Q No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained liner status @D High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc. a No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability Q Meets NRCS Liner Requirements ration equipment fail to make contact andlor 5prayfield Q Yes * No p Unknown with representative ❑ Yes Q No unavailable comments Heavy veg. on walls with rodent damage. Site Requires Immediate Attention: Facility No. " DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD Date: I - S , 1995 Time: r Farm Name/Owner: , QoK r Mailing Address: _�trp County: �y_2QL9 Integrator: on Site Representative: Physical Address/Location: PhoneL4 - 0;;�4!=; Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle Design Capacity: two No. of Anil on Site: DEM Certification No.: ACE DEM Certification No.: ACNEW Latitude: � �LL _ 14Longitude: ]MT JLya}Elevativn: Ft Circle Yes or No Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour storm event? [approximately 1 Ft + 7 in] Yes or No Actual Freeboard: a Ft — Inches - Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes a No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No T Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No Crop(s) being utilized: pt�a ,n 1 („ Does the facility meet 5C inimum setback criteria? 200 Ft from Dwellings? es or No 100 Ft from Wells? 6;)or No Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or�Ho Is animal wast%�nd applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No Is animal waste discharged into waters of the staten-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes o Ho If Yes, please explain: Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manur5,',_ land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or(Na j n Jos •.. nk N floor "a A it 0 1 Inspector Name SignatureV �k - -_ Lko_ - cc: Facility Assessment Unit Comments a sketch on Sack of Sheet DEM SITE VISITATION RECORD Page Two Comments: Sketch: State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary November 13, 1996 John Smith John Smith Farm 1960 Hill Neck Rd Emul NC 28527 SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation Facility: John Smith Farm Facility ID#: 25-25 Craven County Dear Mr. Smith: REGMED WASH I NGTON OFFICE NOV 19 1996 Dr IE K Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly, requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H .0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty. If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office. Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 9191733-0026. Sincerely, r A. Preston Howard, Jr. irector Division of Water Quality Enclosure cc: Washington Regional Office Water Quality Files P.O. Box 27687, Nvf PA FAX 919-715-3060 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 7687 An Equal opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Voice 919-715-4100 - 50% recycled/l0% post -consumer paper WA5HINGTON OFFICE State of North Carolina APR 3 0 1998 Department of Environment and Natural Resources D. E M, Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary NCDENR A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES April 27, 1998 John Smith John Smith Farm 1960 Hill Neck Rd Ernul NC 28527 Subject: Removal of Registration Facility Number 25-25 Craven County Dear John Smith: This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not require registration for a certified animal waste management plan. Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not CT reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day. Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan and contact the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals. Threshold numbers of animals that require certified animal waste management plans are as follows: Swine 250 Confined Cattle 100 Horses 75 Sheep 1,000 Poultry with a liquid wastes stem 30,000 If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant of our staff at (919) 733-5083 ext 571. Sincerely, art. vv, `^' zt,--g A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E. cc: Washington Water Quality Regional Office Craven Soil and Water Conservation District Facility File P.U. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-5083 Fax 919-715-6048 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post consumer paper