250017_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUMH CARULINA
Department of Environmental Oual

INSPECTIONS.
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑
Other Agency
Facility Number:
250017
Facility
Status: Active
permit: AWS250017
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County:
Craven Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
D410712017 Entry Time:
09:00 am Exit Time: 10:30 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Rhodes Livestock
Owner Email:
rhodesfarm@Gen IurylinN
Owner:
Cecil W Rhodes
Phone:
252-244-2055
Mailing Address:
275 Craven Farm Rd
Vanceboro NC 28586
Physical Address:
260 Craven Farm Rd
Vanceboro NC 28586
Facility Status:
E C I'it ❑
Kim C 1' t I t
Murphy -Brown LLC
amp on o omp pan n gra or.
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 15' 16"
From Weyerhauser River Rd. to Cowpen Landing Rd. and turn Rt. and Lt. onto Craven Farm RD.
Longitude: 77' 09' 42"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts Waste Cal, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Cecil W Rhodes
Operator Certification Number: 16344
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Cecil Rhodes
Phone
On -site representative Cecil Rhodes
Phone
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s)
Inspection Summary:
Sludge Survey 4-27-16 Thick-2.2'
LTZ-3.8'
Pump intake4.25'
Waste Analysis 1-16-17 1.07
7-12-16 .88
1-29-16 .88
11)Bumed off small grain - must deduct PAN applied from Bermuda (421bs)
Crop yield complete - continue maintenance on Bermuda
Calibration complete 6-13-16
-just paid permit fees
21 jNo soil test taken 2016
page: 1

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility : Cecit W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date: 04/07117 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated operations
Swine
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine - Wean to Feeder 9,900 6,000
Total Design Capacity: 9.90-0
Total SSLW: 297,000
Waste structures
Disignated observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
lagoon PRIMARY 19.50 24.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility : Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date: 04/07/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
[]
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
[]
M ❑
11
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na He
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
[]
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
■ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[]
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
■ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
Is PAN a 10%/10 tbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility. Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number:
250017
Inspection Date: 04/07/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na He
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Augusta
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ 0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ 0 0
❑
Records and Documents
yes
No Na He
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ [j
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility : Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number:
250017
Inspection Date: 04/07/17 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
�]
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
MEI
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ M
❑
Other Issues
Yes No No Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑M
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non --compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

y
i
Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
250017
Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250017
❑ Denied Access
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Craven Region:
Washington
[)ate of visit:
03/17/2016 Entry Time: 12:30 pm Exit Time: 1:30 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Rhodes Livestock
Owner Email:
rh odesf a rm@ centu ryl ink
Owner:
Cecil W Rhodes
Phone:
252-244-2055
Mailing Address:
275 Craven Farm Rd
Vanceboro NC 28586
Physical Address:
260 Craven Farm Rd
Vanceboro NC 28536
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator; Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35' 15' 16" Longitude:
77° 09' 42"
From Weyerhauser River
Rd. to Cowpen Landing
Rd. and turn Rt. and Lt. onto Craven Farm RD.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Cecil W Rhodes Operator Certification Number: 16344
Secondary OIC[s]:
On -Site Representativetsj: Name Title Phone
24 hour Contact name Cecil Rhodes Phone:
On -site representative Cecil Rhodes Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s)
Inspection Summary:
Waste Anatysis 1-26-16 .88
2-2-15 .86
6.5-15 -80
9-23-15 .68
Crop yield complete - no small grain 2014/2015
Sludge Survey 1-29-15 Thick-3.05'
LTZ-3.92'
Pump intake-5' ) 42% Sludge Ratio; Next one due 2018
Calibration due 2016
Soil Test due 2016
15) Continue maintenance wl Bermuda fields
7) Maintain lagoon banks - cut woody vegetation at base
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
page: 1
I

t
Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility : Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date: 03/17/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 9,900 5,000
Total Design Capacity; 9,900
Total SSLW: 297.000
Waste Structures Observed
Disignated
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 19.50 28.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility : Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date: 03/17/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yea
No Na He
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
[a
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na He
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
■ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na He
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

i
Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility : Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date: 03/17/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Augusta
Sail Type 2
Arapahoe
Soil Type 3
Seabrook
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
M ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[]
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

J
Permit AWS250017 Owner - Facility : Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date: 03/17/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
[]
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rairibreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑0
❑
❑
27. Did the Facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ M
❑
Other Issues
Yes
N
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
0
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon I Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
N ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a fallow -up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Resources
❑
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250017
Facility Status- Active Permit: AWS250017
Denied Access
Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Craven Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 0211 T201 5 Entry Time: 08:45 am Exit Time: 9 A5 am Incident #
Farm Name: Rhodes Livestock
Owner Email:
rhod es f arm@ cen turyl in k
Owner: Cecil W Rhodes
Phone:
252-244-2055
Mailing Address: 275 Craven Farm Rd
Vanceboro NC 28586
Physical Address: 260 Craven Farm Rd
Vanceboro NC 28586
Facility Status: Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35' 15' 16" Longitude:
77' 09' 42"
From Weyerhauser River Rd. to Cowpen Landing
Rd. and turn Rt. and Lt. onto Craven Farm RD,
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Cecil W Rhodes
Operator Certification Number:
16344
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Cecil
Rhodes Phone:
On -site representative Cecil
Rhodes Phone
Primary Inspector. Megan H Stilley
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary
page: 1

Permit: AWS250017
Inspection ❑ate: 02/13/15
Waste Analysis 2-2-15 .86
12-1-14 .92
6-20-14 .93
1-13-14 1,08
Owner - Facility : Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Sail Test 12-19-13 wl highest lime 1 ton) need lime
Cu & Zn values Win range
Sludge Survey 1-29-15 Thick-3.05'
LTZ-3.92'
Pump intake-5' } 42% Sludge Ratio
Calibration complete 6-3-14 ) next one due 2016
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
7)'Need to mow woody vegetation off lagoon bank and seed grass
'Going to burn Bermuda this month for weed control - no small grain planted on fields that will be burnt
250017
Routine
page: 2

Permit. AWS250O17 ❑wner - Facility : Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number' 250017
inspection pate: 02/13/15 Inssection Type Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 9.900 5.000
Total Design Capacity: 9.900
Total SSLW: 297,000
Waste Structures
❑isignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start fate Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 19-50 21 A0
page: 3

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility : Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date. 02/13/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
No
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
MLI
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
01111
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
[l
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
� ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc-)?
6- Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7- Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
8. ❑o any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9- Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below -
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
[]
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/1D lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

• Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility : Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number:
250017
Inspection Date: 02/13/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit.
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Corn, Wheat,
Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Arapahoe
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
[]
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na IN
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 D
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
n
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
[]
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility : Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date: 02/13/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑M
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
M ❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? It yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the Facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page. 6

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250017
Facility Status: Active Permit: AVVS250017
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Craven Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 06/2712014 EntryTime: 09:15 am Exit Time: 10:15 am incident #
Farm Name: Rhodes Livestock
Owner Email:
rhodesfarm@centurylink
Owner: Cecil W Rhodes
Phone:
252-244-2055
Mailing Address: 275 Craven Farm Rd
Vanceboro NC 28586
Physical Address: 260 Craven Farm Rd
Vanceboro NC 28586
Facility Status: Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator; Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35' 15' 16" Longitude:
77' 09' 42"
From Weyerhauser River Rd. to Cowpen Landing Rd. and turn Rt. and Lt. onto Craven Farm RD.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Waste Cot, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Cecil W Rhodes
Operator Certification Number:
16344
Secondary CIC(s):
On Site Representativels): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Cecil
Rhodes Phone
On -site representative Cecil
Rhodes Phone
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility : Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date: 06/27/14 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Analysis 6-20-14 .93
1-13-14 1.08
7-1-13 .88
4-8-13 1 A 4
Soil Test 12-19-13 wl highest lime 1.4 tons } need to lime - next one due 2016
Cu & Zn values wrn range
Sludge Survey 5-4-14 Thick-3.23'
LTZ-3.77'
Pump intake-5.5' } 45% Sludge Ratio
Freeboard & Rainfall complete and correspond wl irrigation
24)Catibration due in 2013 but not completed
Crop yield complete
SprWields in better shape - continue maintenance
page: 2

Permit: AWS250017 Owner- Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number. 250017
Inspection Date: 06/27/14 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
5vvine - Wean to Feeder 9,900 5,000
Total Design Capacity: 9,900
Total SSLW: 297,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 19725_00
page: 3

f Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility : Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date 06/27/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1, is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑M
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? {Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
00
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page' 4

Permit: AVVS250017 Owner - Facility : Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 06/27/14 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
250017
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Arapahoe
Soil Type 3
Augusta
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
1 B. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ng
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
N ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page:
5

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility : Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number:
250017
Inspection Date: 06/27/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
_No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
21 if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ E
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
❑ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
ED
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
1:10
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
E ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
E ❑
❑
page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 250017 Facility Status: Active Permit: AW52500117 — ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Cra en Region: Washington
Date of Visit: Q212012013 Entry Time: 09:_30 AM _ Exit Time: 11:00 AM Incident M.
Farm Name: Rhodes Livestock Owner Email: rhodesiarm&suddenli
Owner: Cecil W Rhodes Phone:[phone]
Mailing Address: 275 Craven Farm Rd Vanceborq Nam'. 28§85
Physical Address: 260 Craven Farm Rd V
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant E Not Compliant Integrator: _
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'15'16" Longitude: 77°09'42"
From Weyerhauser River Rd. to Cowpen Landing Rd. and turn Rt. and Lt. onto Craven Farm RD
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, 5tor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Cecil W Rhodes Operator Certification Number: 16344
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Cecil Rhodes Phone:
On -site representative Cecil Rhodes Phone:
Primary inspector: Megan H Stiliey Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250017 Owner • Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number : 250017
Inspection Date: 0212012013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Sludge Survey 2-11-13 Thick-2.59'
LTZ-3.74'
Pump intake-5.25' } 38% Sludge Ratio
Calibration due 2013
Waste Analysis .64
No small grain planted & no irrigation
11) Overapplication on field 1294 Tract 1 (-26.08)10%
2 (-13)5%
3 {-13)5%
4 {-13)5%
21) No current waste analysis for March, April and May irrigation
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
Nay cut once over summer
-need to cut hay before irrigation begins
15j-Bermuda need maintenance - will re -check this summer
Maintain lagoon bank - keep mowed and maintain healthy coverage
21 ] No 2012 Soil Test - last lime 2011
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250017 Owner • Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Facility Humber : 250017
Inspection Date: 0212012013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 9,900 5,000
Total Design Capacity: 9,900
Total SSLW: 297,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
lagoon PRIMARY 19.50 2�3O
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number : 250017
Inspection Date: 02/20/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees, severe
1101111
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9_ Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
■
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

0
Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Inspection Date: 02/20/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number:
Reason for Visit:
250017
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
■
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type i
Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Arapahoe
Soil Type 3
Augusta
Sail Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAW MP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
■ ❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑
❑
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20_ Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250017 Owner -Facility. Cecil W Rhodes
Inspection Date: 02/20/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 250017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
■
Soil analysis?
■
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (IN PDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non-oompliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AW5250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date: 02/20/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and.Documents Yes
No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fait to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
23. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
❑
❑
■
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Fteviewe rlInspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Is
Page: 7

0
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ _ County: Craven , Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 03jQ912Q12 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 11:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Rhodes Livestock Owner Email: rhodesfarm0)§WdQ2nH
Owner: Cecil W Rhooes Phone: [phone] _
Mailing Address: 275 Craven —Farm Rd Vancebor9_NC 28586
Physical Address: 260 Craven Farm Rd Vangeboro NC 28586
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: 'Murphy -Brown LL
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°15'16" Longitude: 77°09'42"
From Weyerhauser River Rd. to Cowpen Landing Rd. and turn Rt. and Lt. onto Craven Farm RD.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Cecil W Rhodes
Secondary OIC{s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Cecil Rhodes
On -site representative Cecil Rhodes
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s]:
Inspection Summary:
Sludge Survey 3-18-12 Thick-2.83'
LTZ-3.95'
Pump intake-5.78' } 38% Sludge Ratio
Operator Certification Number: 16344
Title
"Did not plant small grain - going to start new weed management program for hay fields
Soil Test 2-8-11 wl highest lime 1.9 tons} applied lime
Cu & Zn values Win range
Waste Analysis 9-26-11 .75
Calibration complete 9-12-11 } next one due 2013
Crop yield complete
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date:
Phone
Page: 1

L
Permit: AWS250017 Owner • Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection date: 03109/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q swine - Wean to Feeder 9,900 6,000
Total Design Capacity: 9,900
Total SSLW: 297,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 19.50 22.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number : 250017
Inspection pate: 03109/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
o
n
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe Cl ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
Cl ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
El
11
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection pate: 03/09/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? n
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? Q
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? Q
Crop Type 1 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
PIan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. floes the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Seabrook
Arapahoe
Augusta
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
■❑Q❑
Q ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
n ■ Q ❑
Yes No NA NE
Q ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
LEI
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection bate: 03/0912012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
Cl
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date: 03/09/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment [PLAT] certification? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andtor document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? 1f yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tite drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250017 _ Facility Status: Active _ Permit: 6M250017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Insp i Inactive or Closed date:
Reason for Visit: Routine , County: Craven Region: Washington,
Date of Visit: 08/04/2011 Entry Time-10-00 AM Exit Time: 11:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Rhodes Livestock Owner Email: rhodesfarm@_s,4ddenli
Owner: Cecil W Rhodes _ Phone:[phone]
Mailing Address: 275 Craven Farm Rd Voncebg[qNC 28586
Physical Address: 260 Craven Farm ad ,
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'1516" Longitude: 77°09'42"
From Weyerhauser River Rd. to Cowpen Landing Rd. and turn Rt. and Lt. onto Craven Farm RD
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Cecil W Rhodes
Operator Certification Number: 16344
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representativetsj: Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Cecil Rhodes
Phone:
On -site representative Cecil Rhodes
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stiliey
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
date:
Secondary Inspector{s}:
Inspection Summary:
Crop yield complete - remove small grain by May 1 st
Complete 2011 Sludge Survey & Calibration
No irrigation since fast inspection in May 2011
-just cut hay - need to bale & remove
-going to re -seed coastal in spring - continue to manage weeds - will consult wl agronomist in spring
-Mow banks of lagoon
Soil Test 2-8-11 wl highest lime 1.9 tons) need to apply lime
Cu & Zn values wlin range
'Going to send off waste analysis when irrigation begins - get lagoon down
Freeboard & Rainfall complete
No subsurface drains in sprayfields
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250017 Owner • Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date: 0i310412011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Wean to Feeder 9,900 6,000
Total Design Capacity: 9,900
Total SSLW: 297,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 19.50 24.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date: 08104/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges 8. Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 01111100
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other Cl
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
110
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
B. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
IN
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste ApRkation
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Inspection Date: 08104/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
Cl
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Arapahoe
Soil Type 2
Augusta
Soil Type 3
Seabrook
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ Cl ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250017 owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number : 250017
Inspection Date: 08/04/2011 Inspection Type: Compiianoe Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and t" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
21 If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ Q ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ Q ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
2& Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
Q
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date: 08/0412011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ■ Cl
Ya-m Nn NA NF
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Air Quality representative immediately.
M Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? Cl ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Is
Page: 6

d
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 250017 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: gWven Region: Washinaton
Date of Visit: 11/12/2009 Entry Time:09,00 AID Exit Time: incident M.
Farm Name: Rhodes Livgstock _ Owner Email:
Owner: Cecil W Rhodes Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address, 775 Craven Farrn_Rd _ _, Vanceboro NC 7B5N
Physical Address: 260 Craven Farm Rd _. Vanceboro N!Q 28586
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy- ftw"LC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'1_$'16" Longitude: 77 09'42"
From Weyerhauser River Rd. to Cowpen Landing Rd. and turn Rt. and Lt. onto Craven Farm RD.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Appiication
Records and Documents other Issues
Certified Operator: Cecil W Rhodes
Secondary OIC{sj:
Operator Certification Number: 16344
On -Site Representativeisj: Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Cecil Rhodes Phone:
on -site representative Cecil Rhodes Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AW5250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number : 250017
Inspection pate: 11/12/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
New COC and Permit in records
Waste Analysis 11-2-09 .89
7-2-09 1.2
2-19-09 1.2
-Manage weeds in bermuda sprayfiield
Calibration complete 7-30-09 tract 1294 and 6037 ) Next one due 2011
Freeboard and Rainfall complete and correspond with irrigation
Crop yield complete - 3 coastal cuttings
Sludge Survey 5-20-09 Thick-2.68'
LTZ-3.85' } Sludge Ratio 36%
Pump intake-8.75'
Soil test 3-20-09 with highest time 1.1 tons
-Copper and Zinc levels elevated on field RF2
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Facility Number. 250017
Inspection Date: 1111212009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 91900 6,000
Total Design Capacity: 9,900
Total SSLW: 297,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon PRIMARY 19,50 20.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250O17 own or - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection pate: 1111212009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Viskt: Routine
Dischar es & Stream Im acts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ Cl ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Cl ■ Cl ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a Cl ■ Cl ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Faculty: Cecil W Rhodes
Facility Number : 250017
Inspection Data: 11/12/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 100/9/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 4
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Arapahoe
Soil Type 3
Augusta
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Cl ■ Cl ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

13
Permit: AWS250017 owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date: 11/12/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Cl
120 Minute inspections?
Cl
Weather code?
Cl
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
Cl
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ . ■ Cl ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Cl ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page 6

i
Permit: AW5250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date: 11112/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ ■
❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Page: 7

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250017 Facility Status: Active Permit: W 7 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Insoection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 0811512008_ _ Entry Time:07:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Faun Name: Rhodes livestock Owner Email:
•Kom;,q I VATINM-
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 275 Craven Farm Rd _ _ Vanceboro NC 28586
Physical Address: 275 Craven Farmer Vanceboro NC 28586 _
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Premium 5tandaW Farms Of North garrolina Inc
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35°15'16" Longitude: 77° 9'42"
From Weyerhauser River Rd. to Cowpen Landing Rd. and turn Rt. and Lt. onto Craven Farm RD.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Cecil W Rhodes
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 15344
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Cecil Rhodes Phone:
On -site representative Cecil Rhodes Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H 5tilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250017 Owner- Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date: 0811512008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
COC and Permit 2009 in records
Waste Analysis B-4-08 .95
2-25-08 1.1
Calibration due 2008
Sludge Survey 9-24-07 Thick-.475'
LTZ-4.54') Send new sludge survey reporting form
No 2007 soil test taken. Make sure to get 2008 test.
Applied lime in 2007
Freeboard and Rainfall complete and correspond with irrigation
Crop yield complete - small grain yield LOW
Just cut hay - make sure to update your crop yields
'Manage spray -fields for weeds
'Start pumping lagoon down for hurricane season
Page. 2

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Facility Number; 250017
Inspection Date: 08/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 12,000 1,002
Total Design Capacity: 12,000
Total SSLW: 360,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 19-50 25.00
Page: 3

Permit: AW5250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number; 250017
Inspection Date: 08/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.! large trees, severe
❑
■
Q
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
8. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Ap lip cation
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
Cl
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Inspection Date: 08115/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 250017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 3
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 4
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Arapahoe
Soil Type 2
Seabrook
Soil Type 3
Augusta
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
0 ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for fared application?
it ■ 0 ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ 0
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Facility Number. 250017
Inspection Date: 08/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
■
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Inspection Date: 08115I2D08 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherissues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 250017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
_n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250017 Facility Status: Agtive Permit: AWS250017 _ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RoutineCounty: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07/26/2007 Entry Time:01:00 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Rhodes Livestock
Owner: Cecil W Rhodes
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 775 Craven Farm Rd Vanceboro
Physical Address: 275 Craven Farm Ed Vanceboro N 28586
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude. 35°15'16" Longitude: 77_09'42"
From Weyerhauser River Rd. to Cowpen Landing Rd. and turn Rt. and Lt. onto Craven Farm RD.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment IN Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator. Cecil W Rhodes Operator Certification Number: 16344
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representativejsj: Name Title Phone
On -site representative Cecil Rhodes Phone:
24 hour contact name Cecil Rhodes Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1
1

Permit: AW5250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number : 2 50 017
Inspection Date: 0V26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
WUP 8-11-05
COC and Permit 2009
Waste Analysis 5-25-07 .93
2-13-07 1.0
124-06 .59
9-7-06 .46
Soil test 3-16-06 with highest lime 2.4 tons } applied lime
Cu and Zn values within range
Sludge survey 9-26-06 thick-.58' LTZ-4.32'
Calibrations complete 9-13-06
Overapplication on tract 1294 field #3 at the end of Feb)less than 10%
Overapplication on tract 6037 field #3 at the end of Feb)more than 10% at-12lbs(24%) on small grain (50lbs)
Freeboard and rainfall complete
Crop yield complete for small grain - no bermuda baled because mowed to control weeds
-continue to maintain weeds
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250017 Owner • Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date: 07126/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 12,000 5,200
Total Design Capacity: 12,000
Total SSLW: 360,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 19.50 29.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250017 Owner • Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number : 250017
Inspection Date: 07126/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VisIt: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO) 1=l ■ fl ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
moo
dry stacks andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any pan of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
0
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
■
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Pag e: 4

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Inspection Date: 07/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 250017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
Q
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
■
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 4
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Arapahoe
Soil Type 3
Augusta
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n ■ n n
Plan(CAW M P)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ 0
16. Did the facility €ail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
■ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
rl ■
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
D ■ n n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
Q ■ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250017
Inspection Date: 07/26/2007
Records and documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number : 250017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
n
n
n
n
❑■❑❑
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
�..
D
V.._
❑
—
■
•..
❑
Lin
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS25OG17 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Facility Number:
250017
Inspection Date: 0712612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues
Yes
No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■
Q
11
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss rev iewlinspection with on -site representative?
Cl
■
❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n
■
n
n
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
n division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: Facility Status: Fictive Permit: AWS250017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Emergency County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/02/2006 Entry Time:09:10 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Rhodes Livestock Owner Email:
Owner: Cecil W Rhodes _ .. _ _ Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 275 Craven Farm Rd - Vanceboro NC 28586
Physical Address: 275 Cravenr Vanceboro NC 28586
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35'15'16" Longitude:77°09'42"
From Weyerhauser River Rd. to Cowpen Landing Rd. and turn Rt. and Lt. onto Craven Farm RD.
Question Areas:
W Waste Collection & Treatment
Certified Operator: Cecil W Rhodes Operator Certification Number: 16344
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Cecil Rhodes Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
DWQ Checking freeboard levels after Tropical Storm Ernesto. Lagoon level at facility was at 13 inches. Mr. Rhodes failed to notify
DWQ of high freeboard level.
Page: 1

Permit: AW5250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date: 09/02/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Emergency
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 13.00
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
■
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
■
D
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
■
n
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
0
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ fi
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ i-1
improvement?
Page: 2

c
A
■ Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency—____�����_�_
Facility Number: 250017 Facility Status: Active _ _ Permit: AWS250017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Qgmoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 06/1912006 Entry Time.,10:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Rhodes Livestock _ .. _ Owner Email:
Owner: Cecil W Rhodrs Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 275 Craven Farm Rd Yanceboro NC 285W _
Physical Address: 275 Craven Farm Rd _ _ Yanceboro NC 28586 _
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°15'16" Longitude: 77°09'42"
From Weyerhauser River Rd. to Cowpen Landing Rd. and turn Rt. and Lt. onto Craven Farm RD
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Cecil W Rhodes Operator Certification Number: 16344
Secondary OICtsj:
On -Site Representatives): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Cecil Rhodes Phone:
24 hour contact name Cecil Rhodes Phone:
Primary Inspector. Megan Hartwell Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AW5250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Facility Number. 250017
Inspection date: 0611912006 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
WUP &11-05
COC and Permit 2009
Waste Anatysis 6-12-06 1.1
3-14-06 .91
1-13-06 .71
10-25-05 .49
Soil test 3-16-06 with highest lime at 2.4 tons. Need to apply lime.
Cu and Zn values within range
Sludge survey and calibrations complete 9-30-06
Freeboard and rainfall complete - make sure to initial after rain events > 1"
Need to use new IRR-2 form. Using old IRR-2 and no IRR-1. Need to put year date on irrigation records. Deducted -4 from Coastal
that was irrigated on sm. grain in March.
"Need to keep track of crop yield records
'Mow larger vegetation around lagoon
Overall lagoon looks good!
Pag e. 2

ki
Permit: AWS250017 Owner- Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Inspection Date: OW1912006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number. 250017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 12,000 6,750
Total Design Capacity: 12,000
Total SSLW: 360,000
Waste Structures
Type identifler Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 27.00
Pag e: 3

n
Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes • Facility Number: 250017
Inspection date: 06/19/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 ■ ❑ 0
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ D
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWI])
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection'g Stora & Treatment
- _......- -—......_._..e .................
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed [I.eJ large trees, severe
❑
■
Q
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.}?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
0
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
WOO
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

ra
Permit: AWS250017 Owner -Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Inspection Date: 06/1912006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Humber. 250017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA HE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into tare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Com (Grain)
Crop Type 4
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Arapahoe
Soil Type 3
Augusta
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAW M P)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ n ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA HE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS25OG17 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Facility Number:
250017
Inspection Date: 06/19/2006 Inspection,Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
❑
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
■
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
■
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
■
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
fi
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
■
25. Did the Facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
■
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those fl ■ ❑ n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes Facility Number: 250017
Inspection Date: 06/19/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWD of emergency situations as required by Permit? Q M ❑ Q
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? Dw ❑ Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0 M 0 0
Pag e: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250017 _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance In tin Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/1112005 Entry Time:03700 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Rhodes LivestocX Owner Email:
Owner: Cecil W Rhodes Phone:[phone]
Mailing Address: 275 Craven Farm Rd _. _ Vanceboro NC 28586
Physical Address: 275 Craven Farm Vanceboro NC 28586
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Premium Standard Farms Of North_ Carolina Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°15'16" Longitude: Z7°09'42"
From Weyerhauser River Rd. to Cowpen Landing Rd. and turn Rt. and Lt. onto Craven Farm RD
Question Areas:
Certified Operator: Cecil W Rhodes
Operator Certification Number: 16344
Secondary OIC{s):
On -Site Representativets]: Name
Title Phone
On -site representative Cecil Rhodes
Phone:
24 hour contact name Cecil Rhodes
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: Ibs N per 1000 gal
7-2-05 = 1.4
4-13-05 = 1.1
2-10-05 = 0.79
Soil test 2-23-05 with PI high on two fields
Everything looks good?
NOTE: I cannot pull up the questions section of this report to check them off. But everything is alright!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250017 Owner - Facility: Cecil W Rhodes
Inspection pate: 08/11/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
0 Swine - Wean to Feeder 12,000 5,300
Total Design Capacity: 12,000
Total SSLW: 360,000
Waste Structures
Tina Identifier Closed Hate Start Date Desioned Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 24.00
Page: 2

[Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection D Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation . I
Reason for Visit ® Routine Q Complaint Q Follow up Q Emergency Not9Tiration Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 25 i7 Date of Visit: Time:
NNot O erational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted © Certified ® Conditionally Certified [] Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...............
Farm Name: Rhadca.UY.l M&....................................................................................... County: CrAUR.......... _.................................. W RO.......
OwnerName: Cuil........................................ R11095 ........................................................ Phone No:(25Z.2.44:1053 ........................................................
Mailing Address: ..T.S.. x�xen..�axall�.lioad................................................................ YA11r.0.Qx,�.'N.C.................................................... U510..............
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: CC90.R11Qd95............................................................................... Integrator: l�1!~l�liin]Al.�xandlitsi.k',�x�.Q�l!IQxtl�...........
Certified Operator:.Ccci.W................................... Rk aft............................................. Operator Certification Number: 163.4.4........................
-•-•-
Location of Farm:
From Weyerhauser River Rd. to Cowpen Lauding Rd. and turn Rt. and Lt. onto Craven Farm RD. AL
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 1S & 16 Longitude 77 • 09 42 u
Design Current
Resign Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Po ulatiou
® Wean to Feeder
12000
4500
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
12,000
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
360,000
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1
Discharges & Stream.ImpactE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes 0 No
c, If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaIlmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
ff gsil Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 24"
1211210.3 Continued

Facility Number: 25— 17
Date of Inspection 8-25-2404
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Apnlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[]]Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility Iack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. 1s there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes N No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ®No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments (refer to
question #):' Explain any YES answers'and/or-any recommendations or any other comments:
Un drawings.of facility to better explain situations. use additional pages as necessary}: [j Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Records available
Waste Analysis:
8-5-04 =
0.56 lbs
5-11-04 =
1.1 lbs
3-10-04 =
0.80 lbs
11-17-03 =
0.70 ibs
$-21-03 =
0.63 lbs
6-4-03 =
0.32lbs
2-14-03 =
0.601bs
oil analysis - dated 3-6-04
- Soil samples collected in Dec. 2003 and this sample serves for year 2003 - Pull samples
)r this year.
Tigation records are complete and balanced out.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _
Date:
12112103 v Continued

Facility Number: 25-17 1 Date of Inspection 8-2572004
.Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
23, Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes N No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
®No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to instals and maintain -rain breakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1 " Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
p No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
121I2103

Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection Q• Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit 0 Routine D Complaint Q Follow up Q Emergency Notification ❑ Other ❑ Denied Access
F- Date ofVisit- ��� Time.130t1
Facility Number 25 17
Q Not U rational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted E3 Certified ® Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: RlluPlisallt[!>t---••............. Counts:
...................................••----.......................----.. Cray .............
Owner Name: Cecil .............•- .... --------•-......... R1 od a......----...-.-----------• --._............... Phone No: a$2].241-2055..... .............. -..........
Mailing Address: 17.5_CrayrK.FA u--IWd.................................... -..... ----------............ VMcchorat-Kc--....----------••------ ...................... 285M..--........
Facility- Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
❑nsite Representative: Gail.Bha c&._.._.......................... .............-. lntegrntor: BUUtjnZFarM3................. ...............
Certified Operator: CcCB..W.......................-.......... R ...... ....... .......... •................. _. Operator Certification Number: .t6.J.49-..... _...
Location of Farm:
FFrom Weyerhauser River Rd, to Cowpen Landing Rd. and turn Rt. and Lt. onto Craven Farm RD. A,
N Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3S • 15 , 1G Longitude 77 09 42 u
Design Current
Sine Ca Pa ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
N Feeder to Finish
2800
2000
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars . .....
EE
-_ Design. Current Design Current
Poukry CapacKy Population: Cattle CapacityC!pacity Po elation
❑ Laver ❑ L
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ other
Total Design Capacity 2AOO
Total S..SLW 378,B[}0
... ...... ... . . ....
Nummber ot.Lagoons I ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 10 Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
HoldingPonds 1 Solid Traps : ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I - is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Dischargc originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is obwrved, was the conveyance roan -made?
h. II -discharge is obsen ed, did it reach ❑ti°ater of the Statc`? (If yes- notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated tlow in gal/min"
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon., y-steirt? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1• Structure 2 Sinicture 3 Structure 4 Structwu 5
Identifier: ...................... •----......_ ................
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑Yes No,
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Sinicture 6
freeboard (inches): ...... _...... 2-0...............

05103101
Facility Number. 25-17
Date of Inspection F 5/712t1t12
Continued
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
5. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-5 was answered yea, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the: structures need maintenanc:erunprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement.7
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any butlers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Fescue (Hay) Small Gram Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the Facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop uced improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. C7oes the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. 1s facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design`?
21, Did the Facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fait to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Roviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes CR No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Com ta'(re%r:fv gtteai�n #l: `E�l�un any::YES ans►secs'andlar:am. revonsnreendatuyins'or_anv_other:eomments; .............x`
use-i
as neeetfsaryp:;_-r; ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
►il test taken 12/1101 no results at time of inspection. Wood ash will be applied as substitute for lime. Remember to take soil test for
follow time requirements.
'aste analysis dated 513/02 no results
1123/02 nitrogen is 2.2 lbs/1000 gallons
6/25/01 nitrogen is 1.9 lbs11000 gallons
igoon level is recorded weekly. Need to lower lagoon level as weather permits and by following guidance from waste plan.
- - -- - - - — — :�;�:� _
Reviewer/Inspector Name Martin Mcl:awhom-_ __. _ _-- -- — -- - _
�%p{,;pR.er�r,.Ciw�Fr.l. Cim.o+.a.p. ilo+p.

05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 25-17 Date of inspection 5l712d[t2
Odra lswues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of property within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation. asphalt.
roads. building structure, andlor public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
*Tract 1294 field I and tract 6037 field I and 2 to be amended to delete fescue and plant soybeans, corn, wheat. Need to contact
ecn. spec.
T. Burial - animals have proper dirt coverage
*Need to clean up old feed under feed tanks and dispose of properly to prevent insects and control odor.
15. Coastal bermuda fields need to be sprayed for weeds.
15. Small grain oversced on coastal field tract 6037 field I A has not been harvested at time of inspection. Harvest by May 1.
*Records are complete and balanced.
7. Need to mow lagoon dike walls (inside and out) to allow for routine and visual inspection.

Michael E. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Nakwal Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division d Water Quality
To: Producer
From: Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2002
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facility
by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it with all other
documents pertaining to your animal operation far future inyspectioni.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the
farm is complying with requirements ofthe State Riles 15 NCAC 21-1.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the fang operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff"
Asa reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Planand the
General Permit; therefa v, these items must be implemented:
qa The maximum waste level in lagoonststorage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP_ At a minimum, maximum waste
level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hour storm
event plus an additional foot of structrual freeboard
qr An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and at least
within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen,
Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
tp Soil analysis is requited annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
(p The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wastelsoil analysis and land irrigation records.
These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years.
rp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during any given W Lllication.
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent poanding or flooding damages. The outlet can be
another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
cp It is giggcged. not a requiremen to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection_ If you have any questions, please contact meat 252-946r6481, ext.
321 or your Technical SpecisiisL
Cc: WARO
.DB't Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-fi4 I [Telephone] 252-946-9215 (Fax)

- Design.:., .:.Current Design-," Current's .'
Ca sci :'Po ulatiaii .:. "'oultry;. ' ' " 'Ga acty, 1'o ulation " Gattle'
P _ _ ty - P ,_- P_ - _ P --
❑ Layer I airy
Design: Current
,Capacity.. Population
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time: 9123l2002 1:45 pm
p of pera ions p Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:..... ...................•
Farm Name: Rhodes Livestock County: Ctayan........................................ ...... .WA]it.Cl.......
Owner Name: Cecil Rhodes Phone No: [phone]
Mailing Address: 225.iuxaxen.Farms.Raad,............................................................. .......Y.animbaraNC......................••.•••.•••.••...•••••.•••....... 28586 ..............
FacilityContact: .................................. ............................................. Title: ............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Onsite Representative: CecilEbQde&.............................................................................. Integrator: Hunting Ez rins.......................................................
Certified Operator:Ceeil.W................................ Rhodes.............................................. Operator Certification Number: 1044......................
.......
Location of Farm:
In Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude ©■ ©' ®" Longitude ©■ ®° ®�
.Swine
pWean to Feeder
® Fee&r to Finish
p Farrow to ean
13 Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
Dischar es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon l] Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? [] Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 13 Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
s#o e.ca acF - - rag p ty_(lieeboard plus:stormstorage};less than-aaequate! -'..❑ �piiiway__��-. _4 _�`---- Y es ®r+o
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................... • ...........
Freeboard (inches): ............... 2&...............

Facility Number: 25-17 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
0 Yes
® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
p Yes
® No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Gl Yes
® No
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
p Yes
ONO
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Managerrient Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
ONO
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
(3 No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? '.
p Yes
ONO
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Genera[ Permit or other Permit readily available?
p Yes
®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
®No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sar#ple reports)
p Yes
® No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
® No
p o violations or dericiencies were noted uring this visit. You will receive no lurther correspondence about this visit.
Comme�nrts:(rexfer o question=u#j.Expla'n anyYFS�anss�vers andrarany..recomm....endattons:.. r.any,other.cortrrztents.:::
9 .;�L'" w-I �"ri Ix9''. '.' x• Y $ � _k ae`� -'"�M .'^W,0xp�Sj
IFse`drawutgs of facility ta;l?etten'e�eplain situations (usedditiuntrl pages as necessary): Final Notes
Field Copy
-, . -'=p p �-
iics:•:,2: fix:-,
Converting to a nursery operation; new certification for 12,600 wean to feeder. Waste utilization plan dated 9/16/02
ded corn/wheat/soybean rotation.
Waste analysis 0.8 lbs/1000 gals. 9/20/02; 5/15/02 2.01bs/1000 gals.
Soil analysis 5/16/02; lime applied this year.
17. Waiting for new Certificate of Coverage for nursery operation; no animals onsite at time of inspection.
oastal Bermuda fields sprayed with 24D for weed control.
7. Planning to maw, inside lagoon dike walls this fall.
Reviewer/Inspector Name e:B. Cu I m entered AnncT ndall`:: r* Da hn l o ..�_:..,:,,, :
y
,b
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: - GL � 6 -

Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit d Routine Q Complaint Q Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of VRit: ZI22I2001 Time: 1:t10 Printed on: 615r2001
25 17
tp Not Operational Q Below Threshold
®Permitted © Certified ® Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...........
..............
Farm Name: Rbadva.1., vvhock......................... Count►': C.......................... ....... ............ . We���i.......
Owner Name: CA& .....................................•.. Rhodes........................................................ Phone No:(252).2#4-20M........................ ..................... I.........
Mailing Address: 275..Cjraxfn. arnLRoad....••••••._................................................•••... VAncehor.Q.xc ...................................................... 28586••••.........
FacilityContact:.........................................................•....._.............. Title:................................................................ Phone No: ................. ..................................
Onsite Rep resentathe: Cccil..Rhodca............................................................................... Integrator: Buntftfarnn ns................•••....•-.••............•••...........
Certified Operator: Cecil ........................................ Rbodxx ............................................. Operator Certification Number:16,344 .............................
Location of Farm:
From Weyerhauser River Rd. to Co%pen Landing Rd. and turn Rt. and Lt. onto Craven Farm RD. A,
H Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3S ' 15 1 16 .k Longitude 77 * U9 2
--.............................
Design Current Design Current Design,' Current:`
SwiBe Capacity Population` Poultrv. Ca ae' Po ul$tion Cattle Ca aeity Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
{
® Feeder to Finish
2800
900
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ 1..ayer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non-Layor ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Othf
Total -Design Capacity 2,800
Total SSLW 378,000
NutnbervfLagoons 1 [] Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management Svitem
Discharges & Stream Im_mpacts
1. Is any discharge observed firom any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge origivatid at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a- l discharge, is observed, ►ras the ConVCVartCC man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State" (Il•yes. notil►- DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. It discharge is observed, n$at is the estitnated flu►►• in gallnrin`?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon s}•stem? (If ves, nolih' DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there cvi& mce of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were: there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
43 Is storage capacity (fireeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Spill►► ay ❑ Yes ® No
Structure: l Structure.' Stricture 3 ytnicture 4 Stricture 5 Structure G
icienti tier: ..........primal y....._..........._..... ...
Freeboard(inclies):...............26.......................................................... ................ ...... I...... ......................................................................

05103101
Facility Number: 25-17
Date of Inspection i1xZ12tiUl Printed on: 615C2001
Continued
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie1 trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (I Jay) Small Grain Dversecd Fescue (Hay)
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)`? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination! ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readih, available?
(ie1 V JP. checklists, design, snaps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25• Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit, You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Use drawinNx
gs,pTTa�liiyxto=better explain situations [use additional pages as necessxry): � final
.,:.::
Field Copy Notes
15. Back fescue field has been to wet to resprig - will complete as weather permits. Mr. Rhodes is considering changing two fescue fields to
tarn, wheat. soybean rotation. Consult technical specialist for W-UP amendment.
* 1RR2 smallgrain overseed and coastal calculated on 8.45 acres.
* Discussed 1RR21waste scheduling.
21. No soil test taken for 2000. Remember to take soil test for 2001.
* Lagoon level being recorded weekly as required by Permit.
* Waste analysis dated 1/18101. Nitrogen is 10 ibs11000 gallons. On 8110/00 - Nitrogen is 1.6 Ibs11000 gallons-
2I . There are three irrigation events on smallgrain overseed without a current waste analysis. Dated 1013 l/01. 1112100, 1113100. Remember
.....—_-;.... .......... __--._.-;.�...---_.....:.:::...............................:. .: -- - _ _
Reviewer/Inspector Name Martin Mcta horn `"� entered b`'Della Robbins- =
ReviewerMsnector Signature: Date:

O5103101 Continued
)Facility Number: 25-17 Date iof Ittspection 212212f1111
Printed on: 8/3/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are then: any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
2& Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure. and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface: of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance: problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan bladc(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the: flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a pertnanentltemporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Commentsan Ut i# t7 $........:..:........:.... :.
.......:.....::.,............. ............::
21. There are three irrigation events on smallgrain oversew without a current Haste analysis. Dated 10131/01. 11/2/W 11/3/00. �
cmember to take waste analysis within 60 days of application.
9. Burial with proper coverage.
32. NIA

of Visit Q Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review D Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O+ Routine O Complaint Q Follow up a Emergency Notification ❑ Qther ❑ Denied Access
Facilit► Number 25 I^] Date of Visit: 5-3-2110t1 Time- t4t1Q
„� - a - ---- --- -
--- NE►t ❑ crational Q I3eIo►► Threshold
® Permitted d Certified ® Conditionally Certified © Registered Pate Last Operated or Abo►°e Threshold: ...........,
Farm Name: Rhadrx.Livestack.................. Coun€►: Craanix.............................................. WA.R.Q.......
Owner Name: CmI........................................ Rho lea...............................................---...... Phone No: (2521.2,44-20 5a.----......---••----....._......
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: Z7..5..C1rayrRFArmRvAd................................................................... Vancehox.&NC................. ... ...... --. 285.86 .............
........................
Onsi€e Representative: Cecil.Rbudes............... Integrator: 'np�
Certified Operator: Cerd.W,._.....•.............. . Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
From Weyerhauser River Rd. to Cow pen Landing Rd. and turn Rt. and Lt. onto Craven Farm RD. A,
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattte ❑ Norse Latitude 35 • l5 16 Longitude 77 •F 09 42
Swine
Design Current
Capacity PaDulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
2800
2000
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
................
Design Current Design Current.
Poultry Capacity Population- Cattle capacity Population
❑ Layer I I Io Vain'
❑ Non -Laver I I ❑ Non -Dairy
:: ❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 2,800
Total SSLW 378,PU0
Number of.Lagoms 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps. ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharages & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®Nv
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is obsen•ed. %ias the umvevancc m.m-trade? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. IF discharge is observed- did it reach Water of the State? (If'yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. II•dischartre is observed. nhal is the e4imated floe- in galltttin?
d. Doe,; discharge bypass a lagcxw sy'sleut'' (Ifes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were them any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillw°av El Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structu -e 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Stnucture 5 Structure 6
Identifier: prinr�.......... .......... .............
Frecboard (incites): .................................................

5100
Facility Number: 25-17 bate of Inspection 8-3-2000
5. Are there any unmediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Arc: there structures on -rile which arc: riot properiy addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management -system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauge markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Apn_liLation
10. Are there any° buffers that need maintenancc/improvemcut?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal BLnnuda (Hay) Fescue (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Diwuments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
I & Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists. design. maps, etc.)
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22- Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as require by General Permit.'
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspeclor fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
13 No violations or deficiencies were noted duxing this visit:; You will:receive no further
correspondence about this visit.
Conknned on back
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
R Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
.. ; ,......_.---------------- ----• ..........,................ _....... . _..
Commen tx'(refer;ty uestian----._..__.-....
q #j•'"1"saplarn xcn : Y11S answers and/or_ a nv: r eco�€nmendatians:or.: air _other. cotnnterrta:::.; =;_ .........
- - ....,.., :Fx::
U d w s [sf faucrhi to' Tarn situations:' nse d ttto Use ra in hetter.cx a d nal ea:as neressary Y : ;r:::::::::.. - - -
- 1;........._.._.............. P.............
7- Need to maw- inside lagoon walls to allow- for visual inspection #
15. Fescue reseeded in spring 2000 and will reseed this fall
19. Has only pumped on Coastal Bermuda. Tract 1294, field 3 - for lRR2 is using 9.69 acres and not 8.45 acres as listed in waste plan.
Have technical specialist check acreage and either correct IRR2 acreage based on current plan or technical specialist needs to amend waste
tan to correct acreage- Need to use 270 lbs/acre PAN for field 3. Waste plan dated 10-29-98 with an overall PAN deficit of 1447.2 lbs.
Need to have fescue application window corrected (currently shows Feb. - Nov-.)
* Lagoon level records are complete
* Last soils report dated 4-27-99 with up to 2.4 T/acre lime needed - lime applied in November 1999 at 1 T/acre
Reviewer/Inspector Name

Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: .5100 I
Facility Numbem 25 Daie of Inspection 8-3-200tf
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properh, within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
2& Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt. ❑ Yes ® No
roads., building structure, and/or public property}
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface: of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. brok-Lu fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ®N❑
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate corer? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary corer'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
.. ..... ............... .
d nm�nents.msdl :n awm S.................::..::......_..:..,. ..
* Last waste analysis dated 4-6-00 at 1.91bs/1000 gal. Need to pull next waste sample immediately for compliance. +
MI

of Visit ❑ Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review D Lagoon Evaluation
for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint Q Follow up ❑ Emergency Notification $ Other ❑ Denied Access
Faeilitr Number 25 17 Date of Visit: 4-1D-ZDOa Time: � Printed on: 8/8/2UOD
.. — - - - -� Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted M Certified ® Conditionally Certiried 17 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .....................
Farm Name: Rho.4 S.L. mtock...................................... County: C.ravva...................................... -----.. WARO.......
Owner Name: Cgxil....................................... Rhodes ......................................... — .... ..... . Phone No:(252)244-Z4.55.................. -................ ....................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: 2.7S.Crayr FArtm.Rusd.......------•............. ........ vAncehojw-SIC....----..----........----......... . 28586.............
Onsite Representative: Cccjj,Rh:ode.St....... ......... ............................................................... Integrator:Biantllll$.EArms.............................................. ........
Certified Operator: CeciI..W.................................... Rhadcx............. ........................ ........ Operator Certification Number: .16344 ............... .........
....
Location of Farm:
From Weverhauser River Rd. to Cowpen Landing Rd. and turn Rt. and Lt. onto Craven Farm RD. AL
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3S • 15 16 Longitude 77 ' U9 42 u
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
2800
1E1 Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
2,800
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
378,0(}D
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons I Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area Scrap Field Ares
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharge+ & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, if discharge is ob wr ved. m as the conveyance nian-utade? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. I1•discharge is obse--med. did it reach Water of the State? (If des. uotifv DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. Ifdischarge is obsen'edj N►hat r; the astinu+ted flow in gallniin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon systeni? (If yeti. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence: of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge`?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate`? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Stnicturc 2 Structure 3 Structure d
Identifier.
Structure 5
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure G
Freeboard (itiche-s):

5100
Facility Number: 25-17 Date of Inspection 4-10-2000 Printed on
5- Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with acquired maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
i 1. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
Confinued on back
8/8/2000
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those: designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement.)
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reiruired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily, available?
I & Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0 'No violations or.defidencies Were:tioted:duriitg this,*islet:; You Will:receiveWo further:-;-
correspondence about this visit. • , • • • • • • • - . • - • • - • • ... . • . .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facilityto better explain situatfons::(use additional pages as necessary):
Lagoon and building surveyed with level and GPS as part of floodpiain casement buyout program evaluation.
Kirby Pendergraft with the Division of Soil & Water Conservation's survey crew at instrument.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes E-] No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
I t'VI
r _ - - Reviewer/Inspector Name s
Pat Hoper, o2529481=, 46�__ -- _ _ Ff2=_ .�

[Leviewer/Inspector Signature: i _ r _ r _ Date:
51001
Date of 1nipertion 4-itl-2ti0[1 Printed on: 8/8/2000
Facility Number. 25—t7
Door Issues
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
❑ No
28. Is there any evidence: of wind drill during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon`?
❑ Yes
❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, mussing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
31. Do the animals fcxd storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
[]No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged t"il1 pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments an or ravings: - -
w.

k
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
August 4, 1999
Mr. Cecil W. Rhodes
Rhodes Farm
275 Craven Farm Road
Vanceboro, North Carolina 28586
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Rhodes Farm.
Facility No. # 25-17
Craven County
Dear Mr. Rhodes:
r`
Enclosed please find a copy of the Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection (as it is
viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facility by the Division of Water
Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm is complying with
requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan and/or General Permit; (2) determine whether the waste
utilization plan is based on total or actual wetted acres; (3) the farm operation's waste
management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator;
(4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion., and/or
runoff
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any
questions, please contact me at 252/946-6481, ext. 318 or your Technical Specialist.
Sincerely, ]
Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Cc: LBH files
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Teiephone 252-946-6481 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

- _....
Dt► tsion aT Sod and Wa#er Canservat3on - U eration Rerievv:-' :_;;=; ::- : __'_:: :-' ;= - .'= == _=
_...--- ------- .............. -- --
....: _
- - - -- - - -- - -- Water Ca an Ins tt - - - - -- - - - -
- "-•..... .....- " - "- 0"Dn�taton.af Sod and , nserpattan'="Comp6 pee -
:__: _
- - - --
C"
...__.....
- -- -- wn af_Water u otn ltance Ins ton :
t• __ ___ __ __ _ - _ __ _
Other A en = ❑ era tan Re► ie�v ---=_ - -- --- --- -
-- -- - ._..._...� g - 1? -
10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DW ins ection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 other
Facility ?Number ^ Z5 17 Date of inspection --- 1-99
r, I Timc of Inspection I41[1 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted ❑ Certified IS Conditionally Certified 0 Registered IONot O erativnal Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ads&.F.gran................. ............. .... County: Cxat:en..................... .--------------•--- W. ARQ..
Owner Name: Coed ............................ ....- Rhodes .................... .................................... Phone Na:(25.2113.4-2055— ....... .............................................
Faciliti• Contact: .............................................................................. Title:.............. ..... Phone No:
Mailing; Address: 2T.5..Craxrxt..1:ArmRoad--.............................••---- ......................... Y.oncehCoro.NC........................ -- ........................ - 28586......•......
• . flnsite Represcntxtr� e: C�xI.Rb�odes......-.•-•---.... ... ... ..
Certified Operator: C061M... ................ --- ........... ........... Operator Certification Number: .16.34.... ............... ........
..
Location of Farm:
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._...
fF.roxt-W.ceycrbAu=.Rixia.Rd. ta.-Cow.tr�&La�adingSd..Andlum.R,L.an d.IA..nnta.Crax p FaxtaxRD---••........................ ...
.............---•-----..........................
=
Latitude 5 ;• 1S 1G Le►ngitude 77 • 49 i-_-42�°�
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Ca acity Population
❑ Laver
z8ao 0 ❑ Non -Laver
❑ Wcan to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow- to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Currentaac
Cattle City Po ula"on
❑ Dairn
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity 2,800
Total SSLW 378,000
Number of Lagoons El Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spra- Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
DischarLes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon El Spray Field ❑ Mer
a. if discharge is ob,en•ed, w•as the coin-gancc man-made"
b. If discharge is obsen-cd. did ii r=;h Watcr of the State? [lf cs. notify DZWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. if'hat is the estirtratod flow" iu gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon systeni? (li'ves. notifi- DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
41 Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
identifier.. .....---•............................................•----...........---................ ................... .................................... ........... ............ ...........
Freeboard (inches): ......... ....27.1...... .....
3 - Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (icl trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
-A171199
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
Structure 6
❑ Yes
® No
Continued on hack

FacIIlttNumber: 25•-17 Dati of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not pmperb, addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenaneclimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Arc there any buffers that need maintenance/impmveruent?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Fescue (May)
5-11-99
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack- adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'-)
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19- Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewimspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p V143�RtioDS, Or,t�CiCIE[1C1C5 R Cre, ilUtt't dUT1Il t�115 V151t:. '�411 Wi��,rECeiVe 110 ftir'tht'i' . ,
-correspondence about this -visit' -
Rto` uestiva
F-K
Cons or ar
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
[]Yes ® No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
[]Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
words available for review. lntergrator card was given at time of inspection.
D animals onsite at time of inspection. Plan to restock in two weeks.
as changed from Cargill to Bunting Farms.
Iaste plan is based on wettable acres (r 751/o), therefore a wettable determination is no necessary.
15 - Chemicals have been sprayed on the fields for the weeds. There are still an abundance amount of weeds. Continue your efforts.
jntinue to manage the vegetation on the dike wall. there were a few barespots noted.
you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-6481, ext. 318.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
-
�L -ri
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ~ Date:

_: [ Division of Sail and LVater;Conservation = Operation
mpli nc spe
Division of Soil a - Co a nd Water Conservation ' e In ction
0
®Divisian of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
= [3 Other. Agency - Operation Review-
10 Routine Q Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSNVC review ❑ Other
Facility Number j Date. of Intip4ctior� 5 -� 797j
rime of lrislwction d / r> 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted 43 Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered [] Not O eratinna/i► Date Last Operated:
Farin Name: .I%,61. r �.V..t s.44........... .. - County:...... i ................................ Lac
Owner Name ............ 1 r �•'..i..............� CC.iJ�.......................................................... Phone No: ... r .'. .4 4. ?.-1........................_.
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title: ........................ ...... ......... ...... ....... ............ Phone No:
Mailing Address: .....r�.....,C..5.a......... ?^........F+ .Ix ..... ...... ak....... ......... . ......I ...k jbv.,.i1.................�..G.............. g.&-r�56.....
Onsite Representative:.... .Q.G!.J.........ekc .... .. Integrator:.. un !......................................................
Certified Operator:...... ............... ......... ........................ ....... ......... ........... .... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 `k I.,ongitude ' 4 "
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
24 Feeder to Finish ��� ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -)]airy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder JE1Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area JEI Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Litluid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Imtract5
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (if yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon El Spray Field El Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance ratan -made:'
1). Il• discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. If dischar re is observed. what is the estimated tlo%v in gal/train?
d. Docs discharge hypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'!
Structure I Structure 2 Structutc-3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Pr
lI
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 91 No
ki le-
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes &,Na
❑ Yes ®,No
❑ Yes ®.No
Structure 6
I-reehoard (inches). !,. �+............
1 /6/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: 7 — 1-7 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the intcbrity of anv of the structures observed? Ocl trees, severe erosion, I—] Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? ❑ Yes J;jNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancclitnprc)vement'? ❑ Yes gNo
8. Does any pat of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markin.-s'' ❑ Yes EgNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprcnvetnent'? ❑ Yes E�No
i 1. is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen El Yes 53-No
12. Crop type --Be:C "r......... ... J 1.(............. ............�-Y.541.1..!;4,,. J........ .......... ........... ......................................... ..............
t3. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes Ef No
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint) ❑ Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'? ff Yes ❑ No
lb. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'? ❑ Yes Wo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fait to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑Yes �No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
g] No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (icl irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
ElYes
9No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®-No
No
Did the facility Fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
�}Na
21
Fait to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Gel discharge, freeboard problems, over app]ication)
❑ Yes
®-No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
EANo
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
gNo
0: No.vitilatiians:ar deficiericie5 .were need during thi�:visit:. Yoti,arilfreceive na further .:.:
- enfnesO idetke; abaiif this visit.:
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any outer comments.
Use drawings of facility. to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):'rv:
Reviewerllnspector Name bo, & WA4i
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ��. 6— "Wu.8.1 Date: I - Rq 1116199

p
I Facility Number I
Permitted p Certified 0 Conditionally Certified p Registered
-up of uawe. review 0 vfner
Elate. of Inspection
T irnc of Irtshectio1) 24 hr. (hh:mm)
in Not Operatirma Date bast Operated:
r ;
Farm Name: ........ .................... Count►•: Craven WARO
ti
Owner Name: Cecil ........................................ R.badja ...................................... :................. Phone No: ............-...............-..................
Facilit►• Contact: ...............................................................................Title: ............ Phone No:
Mailing Address: 275.Cr&'vcn.Fairm.Raad............... ............... ..................................... .Y.aaccbara.NC............................... -....-................. 2858fa ..............
Onsite Representative: .................................................................................... ..................... Integrator.B.unfingEarnm ......................................................
Certified Operator:Cite1l1?................................ Rhodes .......... -................................... Operator Certification Number- 1044.... -....... _.---.......
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©� ©y ®�� Longitude
................ . .
emon
Swine,
Capacity. Population Poultry _
❑ Weanto Feeder
® Feeder to Fin is
p Farrow to Wean
0 Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
❑ Boars
esign Current
Capacity `1?op 'I tiop. .Cattle
:... .
p ayer
p Non -Layer
Capacity Population
Other
................
`Total Design Capacity 2,800
-1otaUSSLW . 378,000
'•
:❑u surace rains resent rea ]PraY FieldArea oLagoons-
HoldingPonds
.,.
I,Solid Traps jr3.No Liquid Waste anagement System -
Discharg�y &Stream Impacts
1, is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharue oriuinated at: []Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the convey once man-made? ❑ Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notify ;DWQ) [3 Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, whet is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
r 49_
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p'Spillway ❑ Yes p No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 'l Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier: ............................ ;....... r.................r ... ............... .............-..........................................-..--.....-.......................
--
Freeboard(inches): ...............................I............................................ �........-..----...............................-.......-----.......-...........-............................-...................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, []Yes []No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/94 a ti Continued on back

Facility Number: 25-17 Date nrinspect.iiui
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? 1'- ❑ Yes p No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and *e situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, 'notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? - ❑ Yes p No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
p No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
1 I . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding p PAN
El Yes
p No
12, Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)?
p Yes
p No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
p No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
Yes
p No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Ajiiwaj,*aste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, maps, etc.)
Q Yes
p No
"design,
19. Does record keep inpeed improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard; waste analysis & soil:sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
4fi Yes
p No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
p No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required'by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
p No
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-sj;e representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does facility require a -follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
p No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause honcomplian v of the Certified AWMP* ❑ Yes ❑ No
>~atiioils'or' deicL`ezrcies.were.nDatei d •durin this visit, - Vair will -receive na further-
'.'COi'x'Q5�7[ill[�£I1C�a�]UL�X��3lS.V1511�.,-,•-••-,-.'.'.��.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. .. ,. .•.,.'. .'.
Comments (re er:to question' : 'Explain any, Y_YES answers: and/or any_recommen wa ips or: any. other commen. s-__11`K
llse drawings of facility: ta'beriei explain°situattons (use .addtttonal:pagcs'as necessary _ m
Adequate structure integrity. �.
dequate allowable maximum lagoon level.
Irrigation/application system operable.
Fields are saturated but not ponde&
�4
Current lagoon level-, 4 r i;
Vegetation is heavy on,walls. Lagoon needs to be lowered to 19 inches. Waste cannot flout+ out of houses into lagoon.
Animals are standing in waste inside houses. Appears cinder blocks on -collection boxes And of houses need to be
built higher to prevent -overflow. Some flow may have come out of boxes.. ;
Reviewer/Inspector Name. Carl Dunn En:tered.by,Ana Tyn Sall:::
lReviewerlInspector Signature: Bate:

t EMERGENCY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
Drafted September 24, 1999
Facility# 2-S - li
Date: '�7 ey
Time: 1G:3 v
Waste Structures:
on -site Representative: Contact#
Inspector/Reviewer:
❑LQ/Dam Safety Rep.:_yl.ky C,l�
1. Structure Integrity (circle one):
Immediate Threat Potential Threat Adequate Other
Cornments(does structure need repair/extent of damage, etc.):
2. Allowable maximum lagoon level (circle):
Structure failed and is inoperable .
Immediate Threat - empty immediately
Immediate/Potential - maximum operating level
(inches from top of dike - must be initialed by DLO/Dam Safety rep.)
Adequate - ay operate at normal levels
3. Storm impact to lagoon (circle applicable category):
Structure inundated
(Information related to length of time submerged. etc)
Flood waters saturated outside wall
Estimated distance in inches (ie136 inches from top):
Structure topped over
(was top of dike cut, etc.)
Flood water originated from
Circle Basin.. Neuse Tar
White Oak
(name of creek, river, etc.)
Roanoke Chowan
4. Date and explanation of remedial action taken after storm:
11

her Parts of Waste Management System:
Comments (lift station, collection boxes, destroyed houses, etc.)
Waste Application System:
1. Irrigation/application system - comments, assistance needed, etc..
2 • System is (circle): Inoperable/destroyed Operable but limited Qp=erable)
3; For inoperable systems (circle):
Lost supply lines Lost hardware (reefs, pivots, etc.) Lost pump No power sources
Other:
4. What is needed to repair system and length of time needed to bring back on-line?
5. Would a generator fix situation?
6. Is pump & haul equipment available?
Land Application Sites:
1. Is field(s) currently flooded and if yes, what percentage of field(s) flooded?
ie s are saturated but not pon e
3. Are receiving crops available? Yes No
If answered no, estimated time before next crop planted
4. Fields adequate to receive waste
5. Comments - remedial action taken after storm which may have affected spray fields:
5. Are alternative sites or third party land immediately available?

Re",'drd keeping:
1 . Records were destroyed and in need of reconstruction
2. Records partially complete
3. Records available and complete
4. Date and PAN of last waste analysis
Structure 1: 2: 3: 4: 5:
5. Last lagoon level readings: 1 2 3 4 5 Rainfall Received
Just prior to August 1:
Just prior to August 29:
Must prior to Sept. 15
Immediately after 9/15
Current level
S. Documented volumes pumped from waste structure since Hurricane Floyd:
7. Current animal populations:
Mortality Losses:
1. Number of animals lost:
2. ❑isposai method used:
3. Does facility lack a means of disposal?
Other comments; unanswered questions, etc.: ve nA %,..ells. L
r.? ��-�i4 C.�i�u)es-4L.�
'Otn n VA$114- ;nsIat ar?iL .trrS �!r„ .f Ljloalt5
�J rQ Y1l... {` 0'^!r Y l a ti!► 7 � ...t -�s w w w.y h rv! ca .� � a +� o^I � kfC� .
* Use hack of sheet for additional comments, sketches, etc,

itl:1['auuv+a,.Mw.:YVM-..... ku�. i a�asW �'4V1IA\i.�(iF►fiRK.'-.-}.ZVLbr�a�s}w�•,a�a.�.}.:$b�!54�.�.E�: �:: ::
y
��y T(yy e.
ionml
'.:i�`;�� �:•:::�..
::.>o �'»`,^,:Oon
as�w
�ci3+»
»£.»......»,.:..«- .....
P»». ....
... ..��
:�i.t' ,�, .oW.QR�r ....y1:: ..Ho:.:eil`as"a�`
... - ...... .„
Y �.. n. .:::..........
mow.
..
...::....
P Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ
inspection 0 Follow-ue of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number 2
Date of Inspection
i0-�2-9Y
Time of inspection
1D:3o 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered
® Certified 13 Applied for Permit
0 Permitted 10 Not OE,4rational
Date Last Operated; ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Farm Name:
�'i•��...........:v2 ;i, l�
County: ........ ...................................................'
.........................
OwnerName: ...................
t:......... .............. ..::,acs..............._
................................ I...... Phone No: ...........................................
........ ....... I ................... ....
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No: ........................................
MailingAddress:.......................................................................................
❑nsite Representative: ........... ........ ....-....-...--........-.-............................................................... Integrator: ........... -........:k.�:...�............-- ..... -
R h_ �';
Certified Operator ;.......................... .......� ...... .. Operator Certification Number, ................ ---
Location of Farm:
.................................... ... ........ ...... ...... •----- ---• .- -- FW
Latitude 0' 0 i 0« Longitude
Design :Current Design Current Design Current.
SW:m' a Cpaty Pop�aacity P pulatiau Poiltry Capacity Population Cattle
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑Dairy
Feeder to Finish 4 aj ❑ Non -Layer ID Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
« Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
EE
Total SSLVV .
.... ......
:Number of Lagoons /-Hoiding Pon& IQ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
....
....,, .� . « � : ; : ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System -
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in ga1/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
1 Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
mai ntenancelimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
[R No
❑ Yes
EA No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
M No
❑ Yes
0 Na
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
El No
Continued on back

Facility Number: l 5 — I i
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures ns of in Ponds Flush Pits,etc:
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): ............................
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste APR[
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type... ..,
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or rnti d Facilities QW
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0- No'violations-or de%cieiieies:►vere ntited-duririg this;visit.- You:W'il] i keive hOtirther_ : -
cgrresporideOe gi oiit this:
Na, �nr•� 0n1' 9,C NV C 1 7rf ry-
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes P1 No
Structure G
❑ Yes 91 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
7/25/97
d
�$' �a:. Reviewer/Inspector Name s .a
7,77
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: i [7 - 2.- 17

s�
:..
DSWC An 1na1 Feedlot Re 1 peration ❑l<ew . _
.. ....., ..5''�.'::. ..:: :. ..
IN D W An><ma1. Feedlot U eratton SiteTns` ection'
P
ri
i Routine 0 Complaint D Follow-up of DW2 inspection D Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Date of Inspection -lam
Facility Number 1
Time of Inspection p: O d 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm States:
Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1. hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Ins ection Ondtides travel and processinm
❑ NotOperationalDate Last Operated: ...... . .... . ..... ........... ....... ..... -._....
__ ..W....... ....__.... _.....
Farm Name:.......... . Tr !� [�rS.._._ .... L[ ` S'c k.._ ..... .-._..... ....... w... ........ _........ County: ......... Ga+trt A _......... .... �..... ....._
Land Owner Name:..._ ...'r ..... 1 r
e - - ....._.......__.... Phone No:.._ . tf ....._....._ .......
Facility Conctact:............ &Cj�.. ..... ��`' ..... Title: ...... _..._._. Phone Na:
Mailing Address: _....... ......
1J y
Onsite Representative . ..... ........._.._...�...�.... .__.... —....... _..... ..... Integrator: _........_.°?�..,�?.+.............._........................_............_.
Certified Operator: ..... ._..... _ t.'.f.__.._w ° ...... ....-..... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude �' �• �'•
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
» ...:..�
Des
u.... »._ .
m.
a :.... m
Pvul.
try -.Ca actt�:�=Pa ulatiari �n;:�• <, CattIe��w�.r CaY�aci� �`Po ulatio
::
❑ Wean to Feeder . ❑ La er a; :,''' ❑ Dairy
n
Feeder to Finish Non -Layer ❑Non -Da'
:':
m 4.:;. q
t:•:
3.:-..-1
« o can .:::�::.� ..
Farrow to W :, »,.� «' .., «�..u«,... � ....:n
Farrow to Feedr:Ta Ut=31 n Ca aet :'" v ;;.,
Farrow to Finis
..�-. ...axt .a»>z .....
�» . urn ».«raH r
.F
Other ».....�• � � .. »«...:.:.
.... ...�.-wed'-.
�.e
.iVuiiibernof;La oons`l:Haldtn Ponds u=':. ❑»
su
bsurface rain resent ;;;,:;•,;<�::
s �.
ILI Spray Field
en 1
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance./improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed From any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
4/34147
❑ Yes ;No
❑ Yes KNO
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ Na
❑ Yes Q9 No
❑ Yes jdNo
❑ Yes WNo
Continued on back

Facility Number:..Z ... —.-• ---.
6
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
P(No
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
XNo
8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
WNa
S.tructures
(1,agoons andl r Holding Poadjl
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) Iess than adequate?
❑ Yes
XNo
Freeboard (ti): Structure I Structure 2 structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
��..... --.... _... ... ..... .,..... _ ....._ ............. .. ....- .... ........ ..........
_.. ._
....._.
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
NNo
It.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
lid No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
M Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-112 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
,KNo
Waste
Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
KNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type _....... _...................... ..-....... .... ....... ................. ..•..... ................... ................... ..-.......... _...................... ......
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17,
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
OrNo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
1b No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
NJ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
'1�rNo
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
XNo
For
Certified Facilities Only.
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24•
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes XNo
Comments.(refer to question #}' Explain'any. YES. -answers andlor any recommendations or.any otheicomments. ;::'
Use drawings of facility to better explain s�tuatians: (arse additionai.pages as necessary}: ,y
�r )�-kta • o ve rs e 5(743 *36-Z@A �4-fV-r 41-4 I�jva"�•
4
Ur(iI` �.Fir.ts 1,•�l+:r� a4� , 4./, 1� �a
�,JQeds : Mr, tl yes ' COS t Ock - Ca4f., j WA41 ; iy Ls
!
AeOol
- -
a
pw».n « ..,..ate... n• ,e. .r •""P`...'.�i::.,.', .�. Eit ".�''r':a»`•... ..... s.,a ,...�.,..+.�ae'+- FFy
Reviewer/Inspector Name-
/00
Re►iewerllnspectorSignature: ,�� Date: �y %
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site visitation Record
Date:
Time: 121 S
General Information:
Farm Name: C-c, c County: � --
Owner Name: C-: ,(- 24. 1cs Phone No: 205-5'
❑n Site Representative: Ca Integrator:.,c��-�-
Mailing Address:_
a� vJ U
Physical AddressALocation: Ewa- ,: _P,1-� 1`I-47-_
Latitude: 1 1 Longitude: 1 1
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Sow/Boar ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy .
❑ l�a:'sery -i� ❑ Ikon -Layer ❑ Beef
eederpa
kf otherType of Livestock: Number of Animals.
Number of Lagoons: (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each Iaaoon)
Facility Ins ection:
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?: Yes d No ❑
Is seepage observed from the Iagoon?: Yes ❑ No
Is erosion observed?:
Yes ❑
No Cf�
Is any discharge observed?
Yes G
No Q
0 Man-made Q Not Man-made
Co ver Crop I'
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Yes ❑
No R*'
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
Yes rd"_­No ❑
( list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type:, f�'+►-- 17 h ^R Acreaae:� 7
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?
Yes ❑
No.2"'
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Yes ❑
No Er --
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes ❑
No --_
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
Yes 0
No iK
AOI -- January 17,1996

Maintenance yes a' No ❑
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes ❑ No U�'
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? yesNo ❑
Does record keeping need improvement? ry Yes ❑ Nfl �' 1d :.
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan ❑n site?
Explain any Yes answers:
�, �,,,,«. • tin ,� a'�c�
r.s
' 7C Date: 44/2s- "4e—
Signature:
Use Attachments if Needed
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Drawin s or Observations:
1
a •
7 l •
Y l
-Q
i
A01-- January 17,1996

Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: 7�g
zs- n ; .25- 17
Time: r21.e
General Information:
Farm Name:_County:—
Owner Name:_ Ce--: 4 21' J`s _ Phone No: 242dS5—
On Site Representative: CIntegrator:„ • c_
Mailing Address:
L.
Physical Address/Location: 4- P,1-I`t4 7—
Latitude: 1 1 Longitude: 1 1
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
El Sow/Boar G Layer ❑ Dairy
0 ❑ von -Layer ❑ Beef
ee�ex is 4 ❑❑
kf OtherType of Livestock. Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: t (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
FacilitIr Inspection:
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?: Yes No C!
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?: Yes ❑ No
Is erosion observed?: Yes C! No 0"'
Is any discharge observed?
Yes ❑
No id'
G Man-made 0 Not Man-made
Cover Crop
`
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Yes ❑
No C+�
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
Yes rd---No ❑
(list the crops which need improvemenr )
Crop type: �+ �- �a-t�-�i'.+. Acrcaae -_4kfD., 7 _
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?
Yes ❑
No
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Yes 0
No e'-
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes G
No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
Yes D
No 2'_
AOI -- January 17,1996

Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes Q"� No 0
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? - Yes ❑ No
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes U-`-No ❑
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? Yes ❑ No ja,
r -
Explain any Yes answers: t-r•4� bound a a t• „�, a Q �. .
Q,�.._ �.��-L'.�.e. .��z�e-�`�� ��...-� hc.:.c�•k �1,�: �1a�; �._7nlG _-
5 �d-'�o�•, -e - l r c l o. L�: w c 5lii,C%kt>-X� VNI Aaa-.s. t- , r-¢crn
st,,. _ j,
!.� i r-- �da�n w 1 n�i► 4�..�a ..� "T�s � �J' �1 a ! Q G .. i�d [{.:'..c:w..t.e.Gfi 1►.-•
Signature: _:3 c.. - Date: 44 125-
cc. Faciliry Assessment Unit V, Use Attachments if Needed
Drawingss o "t - - - ` -
�^-Ni(f-k A-_
ak'^ 4.
a
AM -- January 17,1996