250008_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA .�
Department of Envlmnmental Qual

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

4
'
Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250008
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS250008
❑ Denied Access
Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County:
Craven Region
Washington
Date of Visit: 02/0312016 Entry Time: 09:0a am Exit Time: 12:00 pm Incident #
Farm Name: Rivers Edge Farms
Owner Email:
carsonjones4l @yahoo.i
Owner: Carson Jones
Phone:
252-244-1052
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd
Vanoeboro NC 285868575
Physical Address: 7011 River Rd
Vanceboro NC 28586
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant
Not Compliant Integrator.
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35' 16' 10" Longitude:
77° 13' 41"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern
side of NCSR 1400 approximately
2.5
miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400
and NCSR 1443.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jeffery C Jones Operator Certification Number: 997066
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Rep rosentative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Carson Jones Phone
On -site representative Carson Jones Phone
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date'
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS250008 Owner -Facility : Carson Jones Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 02 O3116 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Sludge Survey 12-10-15 Thick-3.8'
LTZ-3.5'
Pump intakeA.9' ) need to do additional calculations to get Sludge Ratio
Crop yield complete
Soil Test due 2017
Waste Analysis
12-9-15 1.29
10-5-15
.86
7-10-15
1.27
3-29-15
1.8
Freeboard & Rainfall complete - 21) need to initial 1" rain events and check lagoon
-Jan rainfall approx 2.5 inches - 5 events December approx 3.75" ) should be more
24) No 2015 Calibration in records
Continue efforts maintaining lagoon bank
page: 2

Permit: AVVS250008 Owner - Facility : Carson Jones Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 02103/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,672 3,500
Total Design Capacity: 3.672
Total SSLW: 495,720
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon RIVER EDGE 10/14/94 20,00 28.00
page' 3

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility : Carson Jones Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 02/03/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State {gallons}?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? {if yes, notify DWQ}
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Me
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
El
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility : Carson Jones Facility Number:
250008
Inspection Cate: 02/03/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit
Routine
Waste Application
Yes Na He
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
[Hay]
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crap Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving craps differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ M ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ 0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ E IT
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na He
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
E ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
a
Cl ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility : Carson Jones Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 02/03/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and documents
Yes
No Na He
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
1:10
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
E ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Me
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
■ ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
E ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

•
M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number:
250008 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS250008
Inpsect ion Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Craven Region:
Date of Visit:
0112912015 Entry Time: 11:00 am
Exit Time: 12:00 pm Incident ##
Farm Name:
Rivers Edge Farms
Owner Email:
Owner:
Carson Jones
Phone:
Mailing Address:
6305 River Rd
Vanceboro NC 285868575
Physical Address:
7011 River Rd
Vanceboro NC 28586
❑ Denied Access
Washington
carsonjones41 @yahco, t
252-244-1052
Facility status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 16' 10" Longitude: 77' 13' 41"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2.5
miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jeffery C Jones
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 997066
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Carson Jones Phone
On -site representative Carson Jones Phone
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector{s}:
Megan H Stilley
Inspection Summary:
Crop yield complete - facility faxed yields to DWR
25}No 2014 Sludge Survey
Waste Analysis 9-26-14 1,07
7-24-14 1.35
4-30-14 1.83
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
Calibration complete 9-11-13
Soil Test 1-10-14 wl highest lime 0 tons
Cu 8 2n values wlin range
'Continue to maintain bare spots on lagoon
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWS25000B Owner - Facility : Carson Jones Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 01/29/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swi no
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3.872 3,700
. Total Design Capacity: 3,672
Total SSLW: 495,720
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon RIVER EDGE 10/14/94 20,00 25.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS250008 Owner- Facility Carson Jones Facility Number 250008
Inspection Date. 01/29/15 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
M ❑
�]
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
d. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
T. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[]
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page. 3

Permit: AWS250008 Owner -Facility: Carson Janes Facility Number.
250008
Inspection Date: 01/29/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Gram
bverseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Sail Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
NEI
❑
Records and documents
Yea
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility : Carson ,tones Facility Number-
250008
Inspection pate. 01/29/15 Inssection Type Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. tf selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
■
❑ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
[l
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: t
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
E]
❑ 0
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑M
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
page: 5

t
c
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250008 Facility Status: Active
Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Permit: AWS250008
Inactive Or Closed Date'
County: Craven Region:
Date of Visit: 05/22/2014 Entry Time: 12:00 pm Exit Time: 1:00 pm Incident #
Farm Name: Rivers Edge Farms
Owner Email -
Owner: Carson Jones Phone:
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd Vanceboro INC 285868575
Physical Address: 7011 River Rd Vanceboro NC 28586
Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
❑ Denied Access
Washington
252-244-1052
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35` 16' 10" Longitude: 77' 13' 41"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2.5
miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1441
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts Waste Col. Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certtfied Operator: Jeffery C Jones Operator Certification Number: 997066
Secondary OIC(s):
Dn 5ite Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Carson Jones Phone
On -site representative Carson Jones Phone
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AW5250008 Owner - Facility : Carson Jones Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 05/22/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Sludge Survey 12-9-13 Thick-1.8'
LTZ-5.0'
Pump intake-6.4'
Update crop yield for small grain
Soil Test 1-10-14 w/ highest lime 0 tons ) next one due 2017
Cu & Zn values whn range
Waste Analysis 4-30-14 1.83
12-27-13 1.85
9-30-13 1.23
8-8-13 1.41
Calibration complete 9-11-13 ) next one due 2015
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
Update crop yield for small grain
"added topsoil to lagoon bank to try and get vegetation to grow. Continue maintenance.
page: 2

r
Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility : Carson Jones Facility Number: 25O008
Inspection Date: 05/22/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 3,672 3,6D0
Total Design Capacity: 3.672
Total SSLW: 495,720
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon RIVER EDGE 10/14/94 20,00 32M
page: 3

Permit: AWS250008 Owner- Facility : Carson Jones Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 05/22/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
[]
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
■ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
❑ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
■ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance afternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
0
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

U
Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility : Carson Jones Facility Number.
250008
Inspection Date: 05/22/14 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit.
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na He
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
M ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
C]
[]
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
x2a No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
[]
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

0
Pen -nit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility : Carson Jones Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 05122r'14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yea
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
M ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
2h. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
M ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment {PLAT} certification?
❑
❑ M
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na He
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurfaoe tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
[]
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWM P7
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
M ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 6

L
5
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250008 Facility Status: Active_ Permit: AWS250008 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ _ _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Craven _— Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 03/08/2013 Entry Time: 09:30 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM _ Incident #:
Farm Name: Rivers Edge FarFarm§ Owner Email:
Owner: Cslrsgo Jones Phone: [phone] _
Mailing Address: §ag5 River Rd _ ypnceboro NC 285868575
Physical Address: 7011 River Rd _ Vonceboro NC 28566
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murohv-Brown LLC _
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°16'10" _ Longitude: j7'13'41"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2.5
miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443,
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jeffery C Jones Operator Certification Number: 16329
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Carson Jones Phone:
On -site representative Carson Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 03/08/2013 Inspection type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Sludge Survey 12-10-12 Thick-2.1'
LTZ-4.5'
Pump intake-5.9'
Crop yield complete
Waste Analysis 2-13-13 1.73
11-29-12 .81
8-22-12 .87
6-14-12 1.32
'Need to update waste plan - no application windows'
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
Calibration complete 2011 - wetted diameter off more than 10% need to contact tech specialist
Soil Test 2-22-13 (2012 Sample) wl highest lime 0 tons
Cu & Zn values wlin range
7)Need to maintain bare eroded spots on lagoon + mow woody vegetation
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number. 250008
Inspection Date: 0310812013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
_agoon RIVER EDGE 10/14/94 20,00 30.00
Page: 3

Permit: AW5250008 Owner -Facility. Carson Jones Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 03/08/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
Cl
■
❑
❑
Improvement?
Waste Application Yes No
NA
NE
14. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
Cl
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 0310812013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 250008
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda
Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from arose designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
Cl
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Cl ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250008 Owner • Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number : 250008
Inspection Date: 031OW2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
Cl
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
Cl
❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ Cl
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
Cl
■ Cl ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 03/0812013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 250008
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Cl ❑ ■ ❑
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ti.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon I Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
IN
Cl
■ Cl ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 250008 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250QO ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County. Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 06/21/2012 Entry Time: 09:00 AM Exit Time: 11:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Rivers Edge Farms _ „ Owner Email:
rL��-T��.Ti1� • � _
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd Vanceboro NC 28 8� 68575
Physical Address: 7011 River Rd n
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:Murphy-grown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'16'10" Longitude: 77°1341"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2.5
miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jeffery C Jones
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16329
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour Contact name Carson Jones Phone:
On -site representative Carson Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250008 Owner -Facility. Carson Jones
Facility Number; 250005
Inspection Date: 06121/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Soil Test 12-29-11 wl highest lime 0 tons
Cu & Zn values whn range
Waste Analysis 3-13-12 2.8
12-28.11 1.5
9-28-11 1.1 } just sent off new sample
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wI irrigation
-make sure to initial after 1 grain event
Sludge Survey 12-26-11 Thick-1.8'
LTZ-5.0'
Pump intake-6'
Crop yield complete
Calibration complete 7-30-11 } variance off more than 10% for wetted diameter - contact technical specialist .
Remove hay bales on sprayfield
6}Maintain lagoon banks - no woody vegetation
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250008 Owner • Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number. 250D08
Inspection Date: 06/21/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,872 3,800
Total Design Capacity: 3,672
Total SSLW: 495,720
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
kgoon RIVER EDGE 10/14/94 20.00 34.04
Page: 3

Permit: AW5250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number. 250008
Inspection Date: 06/21/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify ❑WQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
Cl
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
Cl
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
■
❑
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Panding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones
Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 06/21/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate: manureisludge into tare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fait to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box betow.
WUP? ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250008 Owner • Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number : 250008
Inspection Date: 06/21/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
$oil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) Below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
Q
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AW5250008 Owner -Facility. Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 06/21/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number; 250008
Reason for Visit: Routine
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose -of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Air Quality representative immediately,
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon I Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Revi ewe d I n s pecto r fail to discuss reviewlinspect[on with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
In
Page: 7

s
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number, 250008 __ Facility Status: Active _ Permit: AWS2500% ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RoulaaC_ _ County: Craven Region: Washington _
Date of Visit: QZ/12_/ZQI I Entry Time:0&00 AM Exit Time: 10:30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Rivers Edae Farms Owner Email:
Owner: Carson Jones - Phone: [phone] _
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd _ Y1 ncebcro NC 285868575
Physical Address: 7011 River Rd Vancebcro NC 28586
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'16'10" �— Longitude: 77°13'41"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2.5
miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443,
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents © Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jeffery C Jones
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16328
On -Site Representativetsy: Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Carson Jones Phone:
On -site representative Carson Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250008 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 07/19/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inspection Summary:
Sludge Survey 12-22-10 Thick-1.8'
LTZ-5-0'
Pump intake-6) next one due 2011
Soil Test 1-3-11 wl highest lime 0 tans
Cu and Zn vaiues w/in range
Waste Analysis 4-7-11 1.4
1-7-11 1.2
11-2-10 1.4 ) Sample taken and waiting for results
Calibration due 2012
"Need to update crop yield for Sm Grain & 1st Bermuda cutting
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
No subsurface drains in sprayfield
'Mow woody vegetation off lagoon & maintain bare areas
Facility Number : 25000
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page. 2

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 07/1912011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Facility Number. 250008
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,672 2,800
Total Design Capacity: 3,672
Total SS!_W: 495.720
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon I RIVER EDGE 10/14/94 1 1 20.00 33.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number : 250008
Inspection Date: 07/1912011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.) large trees, severe
U
■
U
U
erosion, seepage, etc.]?
S. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
Cl
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Ap lip cation Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
Q
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones
Facility Number: 250005
Inspection Date: 0711912011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 100/61101bs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook loamy sand
Soil Type 2
Tarboro sand, 0 to 6%
slopes
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWM P)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
Cl
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page 5

Permit: AWS250008 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 0711912011 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250008
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
WIJ P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of complianoe with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Page: 6

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number : 250008
Inspection Date: 07/19/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
2$. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
❑
❑
■
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon I Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
IS
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

t
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250008 Facility Status: Aoiyg _ _ Permit: AWS250008 _ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Complignce In i n Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 1110312010 Entry Time:10:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Rivers Edge Farms „ , R_ Owner Email:
Owner: Carson Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6305 Ei=r R Vanceboro NC 285868575
Physical Address: 7011 River Rd _ _ Vanceboro NC 28586
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Mur2hv-Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'16'10" Longitude: 77°13'41"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2.5
miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443.
Question Areas:
Discharges & stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Warren Carson Jones Operator Certification Number: 16330
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Carson Jones Phone:
On -site representative Carson Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s]:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250008 owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number : 250008
Inspection Date: 11/03/2010 Inspection Typo: Compliance Inspection Rea$0n for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
'Recommend updating waste plan* Waste Anaylsis:lagoon #2287
8116/10:.99
5/20110: 1.5
3/16110: 1.3
soil test 12/30/09
no lime, Cu & Zn values low
irrigation & freeboard & rainfall correspond
crop yields: 3 cuttings of 61-1. wheat good
Sludge survey 12108109: Thick - 1.8'
LTZ - 5,0'
pump intake - 6,4'
New Coc & permit in records.
'Calibrations due in 2011 **
'*'sludge survey needs to be done 2010**`
Page 2

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number : 250008
Inspection Date: 11/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,672 3,200
Total Design Capacity: 3,672
Total SSLW: 495,720
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon RIVER EDGE 10/14/94 20,00 122.01
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number : 250008
Inspection Date: 1110312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
Cl
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc-)?
fi. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection date: 11/0312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250008
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P2057
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into flare soil?
Q
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Tarboro
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type S
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
Cl
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ 0
❑
❑
16. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250008 Owner • Facility: Carson Jones
Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 1110312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
Q
Maps?
Q
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
Q
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment [NPDES only]? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) Certification?
❑
❑
■
Q
Ywx
Nn
NA
WIM
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ Cl ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those ❑ ■ Cl ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS250008 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones
Facility Number : 250008
Inspection Date: 11/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
n+ka 1-11a¢ Yes No NA NE
31, Did the fadlity fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32, Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

r
Division of Water quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250008 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250008 - ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washing on ^-T
Date of Visit: 12/1712009 Entry Time: I QQ0 AM Exit Time: Incident 0:
Farm Name: Rivers Edoe Farms Owner Email:
N:Z3aLNTeTMr@W-,io n es Phone:
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd Vanceboro NC 285868575
Physical Address: 7011 River Rd Vanr�oro NC 28586 _
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -grown. LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°16'10" _ — Longitude: 77°13'41"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southem side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2.5
miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443.
Question Areas:
© Discharges & Stream impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jeffery C Jones Operator Certification Number: 16329
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Carson Jones Phone:
On -site representative Carson Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

is
Permit: AWS25000a Owner - Facility: Carson ,tones
Facility Number : 250008
Inspection Rate: 12/17/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
New CDC and Permit in records
Waste Analysis 11-18-09 1.2
8-20-09 1.2
6-11-09 1.2
3-6-09 1.5
Sludge Survey 12-8-09 Thick-1.8'
I-TZ-5.0'
Pump intake-6.4'
Calibration 2-15-09 - Wetted diameter off more than 15% need to contact tachnical specialist or Rainman dealership to correct.
Crop yield complete - need month of cutting (2 cuttings)
Need to get 2009 Soil test
Soil test 4-7-08 with highest lime 1.3 tons ) need to applyy lime
Cu and Zn values within range
Freeboard and Rainfall complete and correspond with irrigation
Work on lagoon - eroded bare areas
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250008 Owner . Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 12/17/2009
Regulated Operations
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Design Capacity
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
1i Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,672 3,200
Total Design Capacity: 3,672
Total SSLW: 495,720
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon RIVER EDGE 10/14/94 20.00 28.00
Page. 3

■
Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 12/17/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ Cl ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yea
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Cl
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. hoes any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Ap Ilcp a#ion
Yes
No
NA
' NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overtoad? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page. 4

Permit: AVVS250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones
Facility Number:
250008
Inspection Date: 12/17I2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10°%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Tarboro sand, 0 to 6°%
slopes
Soil Type 2
Seabrook loamy sand
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWM P)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a Jack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

r
Permit: AVVS250008 owner - Facllity: Carson Jones
Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 12117/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 6

7
Permit: AWS250008 owner - Facility: Carson Jones
Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 1211712D09 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues
Yes
No
NA
NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Cl
❑
❑
■
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
32. Did Reviewe rllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
■
❑
❑
33. floes facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■
❑
❑
Page: 7

0 Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250008 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS25DO08 ✓ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Region: Washinoton
Date of Visit: 09/11/2008 Entry Time: g$_Q0 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: ahtQrs Edge F mms
Owner Email:
Owner: Carson Jones
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6345 River Rd _
n NC 05065575
Physical Address: 7011 River Rd
Vprtofrgro NC 25566
Facility Stratus: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant integrator:
Murohy Family Farmg.
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35°16'10" Longitude: 77°1341"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the
southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2.5
mlles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
jj Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jeffery C Jones
Operator Certiflcatlon Number: 16329
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representativelsj: Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Carson Jones
Phone:
On -site representative Carson Jones
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Daze:
Secondary Inspectorlsj:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 09/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compllance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
COC and Permit 2009
Update waste utilization plan
Waste Ana"is 5-28-08 1.4
5-15-08 3.5
2-8-08 1.9
Soil test 4-7-08 with highest lime 1.3 tons } need to apply lime
Cu and Zn values within range
Bermuda crop yields need to be updated
Freeboard and Rainfall complete and correspond with irrigation
Facility given copy of new sludge reporting forms
Sludge survey 2-1 B-07 Thirk-1.8'
LTZ-47) Sludge survey due every year
Next calibration 2009
Continue efforts maintaining lagoon hanks
State agronomist Diane Farrier #252-830-1713
'Send copy of sludge extension letter
Page 2

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 09111/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
$wine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 3,672 3,8p0
Total Design Capacity: 3,672
Total SSLW: 495,720
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon RIVER EDGE 10l141ML, 1 20.00 28.00
Page: 3

Permit: AW5250008 Owner- Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 25DO08
Inspection JNte: 091111200E Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes. notify DWQ)
0 ! ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWCQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ! ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
B. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks andfor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page- 4

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones
Facility Number: 250D08
Inspection Date: 0911112008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste A
Yes NA NA NE
PAN?
Cl
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.7
❑
Total P2057
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Dutside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
0
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook loamy sand
Soil Type 2
Tarboro sand. 0 to 6%
slopes
Sal Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ Cl ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determinaton?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page 5

Permit: AW525DDW Owner - Facility: Carson Jones
FacII4 Number: 250008
Inspection !late: 08/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason far Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate tax below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields? ■
Stocking? ❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a raintreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ❑ ■
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment {PLAT} certification? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ 0
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

Permit: AW5250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 09111MOB Inspection Type- Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 250008
Reason for Visit: Routine
30. At the time of the inspection did the fad lity pose an air quality coneem? If yes, contact a regional Air
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the fad lity fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer? Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes No NA NE
❑❑❑■
Page. 7

0 Division of Water quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250009 Facility Status: Wive Permit: AWS250008 U Denied Access
Inspection Type: Com li nce Inspection _ _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: v n Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07111 /2007 Entry Time:01:00 PM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Rivers Edge Farms
Owner: ggrson Jones
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd _ Vanceoro, NC 285868575 _
Physical Address: 7011 River Rd I Vanceboro INC 28 QQ
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°16'09" Longitude: 77°13'44"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2.5
miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443.
Question Areas:
Discharges & stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Jeffery C Jones
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Collection & Treatment
Other issues
On -Site Representative(s): Name
On -site representative Carson Jones
24 hour contact name Carson Jones
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
W Waste Application
Operator Certification Number: 16329
Title
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date:
Phone
Page: 1

Permit: AW5250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Janes
Facility Number : 250008
Inspection Date: 07/11/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
COC and Permit 2009 - use to be under NPDES
WUP needs to be updated
Waste analysis 5-29-07 2.0
3-9-07 1.7
12-22-06 1.2
Soil test 3-21-07 with highest lime .8 tons
Cu and Zn values within range
Crop yield complete
Rainfall and freeboard complete
Irrigation complete and corresponds with freeboard
Sludge survey 2-15-06 thick-1.8' LTZ-4.2'
Calibrations 2-1-07 with 131 GPM } Use on IRR-2
`MOW outside of lagoon bank ASAP
-Continue efforts to establish vegetation on lagoon
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones
Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 07/11/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,672 3,381
Total Design Capacity: 3,672
Total SSLW: 495,720
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon RIVER EDGE 10/14/94 20,00 29.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250008 Owner • Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number : 250008
Inspection Date: 07111/2007 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VIsIt: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? [if yes, notify DWQ]
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
01
01
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? {Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
0110
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste A plication
Yes
No
NA
NE
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250008 Owner • Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number. 250008
Inspection Date: 07/11/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? D
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.? D
Total P2O5?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? D
Evidence of wind drift? n
Application outside of application area? El
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook loamy sand
Soil Type 2
Tarboro sand, 0 to 6%
slopes
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
D
■
D
D
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
D
■
D
D
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
❑
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
D
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
D
■
❑
D
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250008
Inspection bate: 07/11/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? 0
Maps? ❑
Other? D
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
❑
23. If selected, did the Facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (AIPDES only)?
❑
■
D
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
11
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
D
Q
■
I!
Other issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 6

Permit:AWS250008 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number:250008
Inspection Date: 07/1112007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Vac Mn HA NF
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional QWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ Cl ❑
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 0 ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

S
Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency ____— ------------- T
Facility Number: 250008 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA226008 Denied Access
Inspection Type: ,structure Evaluation
Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Follow-u
County: Craven _ Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 12/01/2006 Entry Time: I Q721 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Rivers Ed a Farms
Owner Email:
Owner: Carson Jones
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd
Vanceboro NC 285865575
Physical Address: 7011 River Rd
Vanceboro NC 28586
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35° (O ;' _ Longitude: 77°13'44"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located
on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2.5
miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443.
Question Areas:
jj Waste Collection & Treatment
Certified Operator: Jeffery C Jones
Operator Certification Number: 16329
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Carson Jones
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Follow-up inspection because on the last site visit the lagoon was high_ Lagoon not compliant and Mr. Jones failed to notify DWQ.
Facility will get DWQ a plan of action.
Rag e: 1

41
H
Permit: NCA225008 Owner • Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 12JO112006 Inspection Type: Structure Evaluation
Waste Structures
Facility Number : 250008
Reason far Visit: Follow-up
Type Identifier Closed pate Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon RIVER EDGE 10/14/94 20.00 15.00
Waste Collection, Storage !� Treatrnent Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
■
n
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
5. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
0
[1
❑
■
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
■
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, fl ■
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ n it ■
improvement?
Page: 2

Division of Water Quality
j� Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250008 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA225008 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Emergency _ County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/0212006 Entry Time:09:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Rivers Edge Farms
Owner Email:
Owner: Carson Jones
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd
Vanceboro NC 285868575
Physical Address: 7011 Rivec Rd
Vanceboro NG_22 5_86 _
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant n Not Compliant
Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35'16'09" Longitude: 77°13'44"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2.5
miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443.
Question Areas:
W Waste Collection & Treatment
Certified Operator: Jeffery C Jones
Operator Certification Number: 16329
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Carson Jones
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Checking lagoon levels after Tropical Storm Ernesto. Facility lagoon level at 18 inches. Mr. Jones failed to notify DWQ of high
freeboard level. Also, there was severe erosion occuring on lagoon banks and large vegation that needs to be cut down.
Page: 1

Permit: NCA225008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 09/02/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Emergency
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�agmn RIVER EDGE 10/14/94 20.00 18.00
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
Yes No NA NE
■non
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
■ n
n n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
■ n
❑ n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■ n
❑ n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n ■
n n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n ■
n n
improvement?
Page: 2

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250008 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA225008 _ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RRputine County: Cr v Region: Washington _
Date of Visit: 03/27/2006 Entry Time:09:00AM- Exit Time:12:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Rivers Edge Farms Owner Email:
Owner: Carson Jones
Phone: 2 - -1 2
Mailing Address: §305 River Rd Vanceboro NC 265666575
Physical Address: 7011 River Rd _ Vanceboro NC 28586
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35016' 9" Longitude: 77013'44"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2.5
miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
© Records and Documents
Certified Operator; Jeffery C Jones
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
On -site representative
24 hour contact name
Waste Collection & Treatment
Other Issues
Name
Carson Jones
Carson Jones
W Waste Application
Operator Certification Number: 16329
Title
Phone:
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone
Page: 1

Permit: NCA225008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones
Facility Number: 250008
Inspection hate: 03/2712006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
WUP 8-25-97 - NEED TO UPDATE PLAN
COC and Permit covered through 2007
Waste Analysis 2-1-06 1.3
9-9-05 2.1
6-3-05 1.6
"Make sure to get waste sample to cover 60 days before or after irrigation event. Make sure to use correct waste analyis on IRR-2
forms.
PEAT complete 64-04
Crop yield complete
calibrations complete
Sludge survey complete 2-15-06, appears to be in compliance. Mail sheets that are needed to complete sludge survey. Some pages
missing from records.
7) address barespots on lagoon
rainfall records complete
Page: 2

Permit: NCA225008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number : 250008
Inspection Date: 03127/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,672 3,672
Total Design Capacity: 3,672
Total SSLW: 495,720
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed bate Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon RIVER EDGE 28.00
Page: 3

Permit: NCA225008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Numbar : 250008
Inspection Date. 03/2712006 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Dischercles 8 stream Impacts
Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure n
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 0 ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Q
■
❑
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
D
■
0
0
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
it
■
❑
Cl
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0110
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
0
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
1100
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
0
0
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
[I
❑
improvement?
Waste Aptcation
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
11
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? Q
Page: 4
...

Permit: NCA225008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number : 250008
Inspection Date: 03127/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN a 10%110 lbs.? ❑ +
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook
Soil Type 2 Tarboro
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
0
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
n
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5
■

Permit: NCA225008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones
Inspection Date: 03/2712006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number : 250008
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Q
Q
n
n
■ Q Q Q
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after a 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
■
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
Q
■
Q
Q
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
Q
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
Q
■
Q
Q
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
0
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
Q
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Q
Q
Q
■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: NCA225008 owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number : 250008
Inspection Date: 03127/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ m D ❑
32. Did Rev iewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspectian with on -site representative? Q ■ Q it
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

It
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 250008 Facility Status: Active Permit. NCA225008 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: r v n Region: Washin=r-
Date of Visit: 08/13/2Q05 Entry Time: 03:00 PM Exit Time:
Incident M.
Farm Name: Rivers Edge Farms _ Owner Email:
Owner: Carson Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd _ Vanceboro NC 28586a575
Physical Address: 7
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy Family Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°16'09" Longitude: 77'13'44"
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern} side of NCSR 1400 approximately 2.5
miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443.
Question Areas:
® Discharges & stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents ® Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jeffery C Janes
Operator Certification Number: 16329
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
On -site representative Carson Jones
Phone:
24 hour contact name Carson Jones
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s)-
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: Ibs N per 1000 gal.
6-3-05 = 1.6
3-10-05 = 2.1
12-3-04 = 1.2
Current soil test.
Page: 1

i
Permit: NCA225008 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number. 250008
Inspection Date: 08/13i2fl05 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,672 3,625
Total Design Capacity: 3,672
Total SSLW: 495,720
Waste Structures
Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
;WTA4MIDICial
30.00
Pag e: 2

Permit: NCA225008 Owner - Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 08/13/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & SLeair Imparts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated votume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑
yes
■ ❑
No NA
❑
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.1 large trees, severe erosion•
❑
■ ❑
❑
seepage, etc.)?
B. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑
■ El
71
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks
❑
■ ❑
❑
and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
0
Yes
No NA
NE
Waste Annficat on
10. Are there any required buffers• setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10°1oN0 Ibs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Page: 3

Permit: NCA225008 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones
Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 08/13/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
WaVe Annfira}ion Yes No NA NE
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Seabrook
Soil Type 2
Tarboro
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management PIan (CAWMP)?
❑
0 ❑
11
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
1$. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
0 ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
Yes
N ❑
No NA_J
❑
P
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Cl
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0110
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ 0
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
N ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
N ❑
Cl
26- Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
El
Page: 4

Permit: NOA225008 Owner -Facility: Carson Jones Facility Number: 250008
Inspection Date: 08/13/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
RecoLds and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
lssues
Yes
❑
yes
No NA
0
No NA
NF
❑
NF
Other
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
00
❑
❑
29. aid the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those mortality
❑
■ ❑
❑
rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality ooncem? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality
❑
M ❑
❑
representative immediately-
3 1. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
on
❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
33. Does facility require a fallow -up visit by same agency?
❑
0 13
❑
Page: 5

Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation 11
Reason far visit *Routine D Complaint C1 Follow up D Emergency Notification d Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 25 8 Date of Visit: 8-2-2004 Time: 933
O Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted 0 Certified N Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .................
Farm Name: UWxjK.Edze,.FaxaU ....................... County: CX'AYj l...............................................1' ARO........
Owner Name: U1som....................................him............................................................ Phone No: 252-2-44.-1402 ...........................................................
Mailing Address: fi3.l15..11.1E:Cr.Rd............................................................ _................ ........ YRaCCb.4]CR.NC........ __........................................ vism .............
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Rep resentative:.QjjqEL.J.Qxxcs........................................................................•-•-•• Integrator: r&ur9hy..Famj]y.F#.r.= .....................................
Certified Operator.j.c[fe.1x.0 ............................... , ARCE........................................_........ Operator Certification Number- 16329.............................
Location of Farm:
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance Is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 A,
approximately 2.5 miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 15 0966 Longitude
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
I 1 ❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
3672
❑ Non -Layer
HE ❑ Non -Dairy
I
Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
❑ ether
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
3,672
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
495,720
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 Subsurface Drains Present JLSpray Field Area
Trans -
Disc harses & Stream Ympacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ 0ther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
�'Vaste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 5
identifier: ........................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 22"
12/12103 Continued

Facility Number: 25-8
Date of Inspection 8-2-201i4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancetimprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
I3. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N No
Odor Issues
IT Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atior below ❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes
N No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes
N No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes
® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Coiriinepts'refer d' question`# : ` Ex 'lain an:YES'answers and/or an ':recommendations or an other comments.
I& drawings of fad -tobetter"eaplaio_situatiaiis::{use additiniial.pages as necessary):,. ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Records available
A6
Awaiting most current results - mailed samples to NCDA Lab on July 27, 2004
Waste analysis: 4-8-04 = 1.8 lbs
1-22-04 = 1.5 lbs
11-6-03 1.2 lbs
7-22-03 =1.2 lbs
3-26-03 = 2.2 lbs
12-17-02 =1.5 lbs "
Soil test for 2003 - samples collected in Dec. 2003 - results came back with high phosphorus (few fields) - deep soil
samples came back OK.
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Spray fields are in good shape - Practice weed control upon need.
reeboard, rainfall, crop yields, stocking/mortality records are kept.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B. Hardison
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 25-8
Date of Inspection 8-2-2DD4
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
34. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
N Yes
❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
N No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
N No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Stocking Form [:]Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about
this visit.
Additional Comments and/or Drawings: _
Sludge survey, irrigation calibration are complete. A.
Continue your efforts to improve the bare spots on dike wall.
If you. have any questions, contact your T. Specialist or me @ 252-946-6481.
12112103

Facility Number - ® Date: /1?J04 Time: 1 900 1 Time On Farm: 6l3 WaRO
Farm Name Rivers Edge Farms County Craven
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 6305 River Rd Vanceboro NC 28586
Onsite
Representative Carson Jones Integrator ILL murphrey Farms
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
3672
3672
Q Routine
0 Response to DWQIDENR referral
Q Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
Q Response to complaintflocal referral
0 Requested by producer/integrator
Q Follow-up
Q Emergency
Q Other...
Design Current
Caoacitv Pooulation
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
$- Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level [inches] 127
CROP TYPES lCoastal Bermuda -hay I ISmall grain overseed
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES Sc TaB
7. What type of technical assistance does the ❑nsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
I Facility Number 25 - 8 Date: 2112/04 I
PARAMETER
171 F1 Wastp- cnill Ipnvinn site
Q No assistance provided/requested
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
$- Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level [inches] 127
CROP TYPES lCoastal Bermuda -hay I ISmall grain overseed
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES Sc TaB
7. What type of technical assistance does the ❑nsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
I Facility Number 25 - 8 Date: 2112/04 I
PARAMETER
171 F1 Wastp- cnill Ipnvinn site
Q No assistance provided/requested

❑ 90 Waste spill contained on site
I tL:HNIL'AL A5515 I ANL:t Needea
NroyicieO
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
El
❑
[110. Level in structural freeboard
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
28. Forms Need {list In comment section)
❑
❑
El 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
29. Missing Components (fist in comments)
❑
❑
[114. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
30. 21-1.0200
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
re -certification
[116. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Latelmissing waste analysis
33. Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
[119. Latelmissing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
®
❑
[120. Latelmissing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker checklcalibration
❑
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
] Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
®
❑
] Referred to NCDA Date-
-
43. Irrigation designlinstallation
El
El
] Other...
system
Date:
44. secure Irrigation information((maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationlrecommendations
❑
❑
2
49. Drainage work/evaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.3.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
5'
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
67. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. soil andlor waste sampling education
❑
❑
Facility Number 25 - ® Date: 2112104
COMMENTS:
6 03/10/03

Haste analysis dated 1116/03 nitrogen is 1.2 Ibs
1/22104 nitrogen is 1.5 Ibs
1. Need to calibrate irrigation reel
4. Need to secure sludge survey.
Remember to complete annual certification by March 1.
Soil test taken Dec 03 Waiting for lab results. Follow lime requirements.
Veed to contact tech spec. to include crop windows in waste plan.
RR1 remember to record inspection of irrigation every 120 min during irrigation.
RR1 and IRR2 records are complete and balanced.
;rop yield records available for review.
_agoon level and rainfall recorded weekly with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation events.
knimal stocking records on site.
=arm is well maintained.
Receiving crop in good condition.
_ift station working properly.
_agoon dike walls have been sprayed with 2-4-D for weed control.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST Martin McLawhorn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 16104 Entered By: IMartin McLawhorn
7 03/10/03

(Type of Visit a Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit a Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other ; p Denied Access
Facility Number
Date or Visit: 9/5/2002 Time: 10:55 am
p Not Operationalp Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified E Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Rivers Edge Farms
Owner Name: Carson Jones
Mailing Address: 6305 River Rd
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: No one onsite
Certified Operator: Jeffery C. Jones
Location of Farm:
County: Craven
Phone No: 252-244-1402
Vanceboro NC
Title: Phone No:
Integrator: Murphy Family Farms
Operator Certification Number:16329
Harm is located off NUSK 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side o
approximately 2.5 miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443.
WaRO
28586
a Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude ©. ®� ®K Longitude
Design Current. _ . _.-Design—.Current .° . W Design, Current
Swine' = µ y = Capacity. -` population. Poultry - - Capaeity .:PopuIation'. h $t e ' - ;, Capacity.. Population .
p Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
p Farrow to Wean
[3 Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
- El Layer d[3 Dairy
p Non -Layer F' E? on- airy
= 13 Other '; r
- = " Tk - 1 Design Capaeity 3,672
- _ Tvtal'SSLW 495,72a
Numfier.orLagoons " _ ® u sur ace rams resen 13 agoon rea ® pray ie rea
Holding.Ponds./:.Solid.Tra,...ps p o Liquid a Management System --
y .
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 Yes NNo
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) [3 Yes p No
c- If discharge is obsmed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
1 Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
3- Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? [3 Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): 38

Facility Number; 2g_08 Date of Inspection
. 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
R No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
{If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
p Yes
® No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
p No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
N No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)?
❑ Yes
B No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
N No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes
®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑Yes
®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
In No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. Vou will receive no further correspon ence about this visit.
itCommens efer-to fiotoanExanYrsaadlrc iieisf'iiidation`s-or;aoyotlierlainyESanswe: = _
.:.....,.::.: . W. - - - -
Use'drawvin s of facili tohetter�ex 1atn;situatians.:{use:addttiona3ipages�asnecessa "° ' � w `�' �-� �' -- '
7. Inside and outside of dike wall should be mowed and shrubbed to remove heavy vegetative growth. Tree
saplings noted along outside dike walls and tall weeds shading out grass. Top of dike has been mowed and
maintained.
* Irrigating in front field at time of inspection.
S. Check on Hydrant I in back field - small leak and spray coming from hydrant, should be repaired to prevent
further problems. No discharge observed.
Irrigation records complete with nitrogen balance. (SEE PAGE 3) `
Reviewer/Ins ector Name rDa hne'BfCnll....._.� ':_::::--''::"m.'' .:' entered b .:Ann. ndali ` i;'; ; m,::::..'..
F p otn........
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

05103101
Continued
Date of inspection
aci y um er; 25_,08
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
17 Yes
p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
p Yes
® No
28.
is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
p Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property) `
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon".
0 Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
p Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
p Yes
® No
32,
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
p Yes
p No
Waste analysis 7/17102 - 1.81bs/1000 gals. ;:
Soil analysis 1/2002
It F
6i
h ' A
1 -
4
14,
•1
� .
� 1
� y
• :i
,1

a: a.
Ir+
k �r r
} f:
3•
r`
if
.I
5 ,: r.
In
k.
_r , E.
— 1 1
w ii•' r f .
t � U i.
y� i,
4
r' y
f
3 k�
k.
�.x
x r f• 2.
it 3.- . i'k :I;F 'i'� " t` ;.,.F `.; 1.: .�y�....:;,•: •.r.rr �:I' s ..
Ln
I. � r I �'.{r. 1. '•�. �.. i fii<� E • �i. M
i • t.
t ' I• Y .
r.,.
M1• � n
_
JJ
.y �
1 •� k . }
I� #'
::.. x.
j, r7
�
t ; ., -�
r, 3;
�k � a
I• • �; r
_
e
5LLJ
zo
1 \�5...
I , .
! q
f" �d
Y
)41
o CL
r r..1 '#.€':r,r:� •`.« }•, 'E1 .., s.:�.ih:,,. •" - ..,,:r..:.-._ x..,:;...�::f:_ ter, ,,,.� :,:: - 1. •� ..�.
1. y i 6_ ..w.__ `r.....}' . -: wk✓ . ; ter,: „� �. r I I'' '�l;. v
�>� ll�r, .»� `i .. k,l �V •e.«.�: .��I' f •,�€.� '�'�a-;«.,�:.' ••� 'iS �7+ �•,1 F :Yr :[' :.' '"�. ..:. �.
.:.:,'',�,;...�m:.4 � r�.i.:-,�,('...» I: I �I�..:#.�,.-«•'"ry , t;�, _ y :'r.°: y:. 111111 , a?. �. .� . ! �,.:I:i
rtj sn. f t Y r 111 1:t' s r: .. 1: 4..
.' rt . ; 4;i . a i I { r : - .M �. �•s r �.! .4 . `L: 9 J7It
" • d i :i •'.!. ; bra, • i(
;'
s.S s 'il : s-(�"�'': .! ^^, it jy `E, j •.i: L .'if' '' dd
6 j, k p{}may s �• ,.
..., ■3 .1 � ¢ Ili[ ..
l.li:i .1• I, 1' YTS`` ... .. C' L— �,. .. i �3J,;{ ],
\A"•�(' tl
ji
� MY',
.;� . �� ::1� :/' .�'.�':�' .�.'F•1+� .� - :.a'� r� ' � . T1', y � � 1. • :+. (� a]
Iv�r � f : � i' ' I 1: _iD
r. ! .:x: k ,Shr'� t. CJ' T:: l,.' rrl �,..r'• i ,,r' '1 "!( •✓ , .:Y' .. �€ . = 6 �? :f$ ::;k;:i: :,..... t ! I ..ji i'` q
�I
I:
E , { .3r �! ��'/,J.J.{ ••'a.e:- �N• 9\ "'}s �'i'i:• !'�a. ,"=ki '@ :�.. a -A � •# '!S;: ��� � ,.:I�; $ `�' ❑
N
I
iiiFF _ %i're •, •'�,.?} a^�{ li li /" �><:q�• •""�'yi! tY I i{ 'i u f:€, ''{4 'Ik ki•s.tt z! +I�Iv`A lmiJ � N
,
y r _ 6
�+
I. Y•• L n
�_a
b :T " 11 ['�"" 1
�.
e. �' t . ..p• f.SJ �." ,r/ /- G .1. ':�' ':E:I' i��+ �F:;''- �� ..t€ '.: :J'L ". _ 'fury
i.i �•li i: r�k •�3 :•.c '"/.'=� �'r. i:ii:>.'I.. •i 4 f S!� �..: t�:,.s',-c'� � =3. .� _
t 1 �.1 l:i''f= 10 ••' •� 7'.Y" s: �'.::3 y �. 'i I '].: F.=s. d' ..Ci • d 's`' L� ro ,�' .., / ,� i it k S �' "':�t , f: '� � . t . •' �::. y:;' I � i. •' : # $` s: �
l
f; �'• C. I 1'r "1t�t i [��' s. Y"� -�'. „r-I' S#' 'i. .�.� _ }. 4.1;�-. ".f�, , ^. E'�:. �.�. ,�: /' �' 3'. •'i
��, �'� n .�,r 14�e; .a � 'V �I 'I' �'�I.'� I'.� �::( :f}� .���.. ,;�' � y[ •:� i�?' i� .-',FRr.>�•, .:�•t 1[�
[[ 1 ! r! : %'J. '.S:".: F i' .j •.'S Y ;, f3 Y F� I.'._ j [ / .inn: �'` �!
.°`� a:[ .+'r 'I i n.iawt _rt•. _ �� /.�jf � F?�i�k; i,`j �,;.' ��' �;� �1 •Y `•� � d' �: :�'. .. .�'.i.� . j,! !�a.�'... a�::�. ' ��� �� •�•' i�"���'.i .: �r��,. •i��� �' 'i' y�,' . �Y� wY,'N4���` `�a

�..+« .1 �Z'_ +�'+w._ F 1 ,. •'�.��•� •�} �.-�i 'f "4 •.,,�p'�,7 J•�� . f ;-- �;` .�"•'��• �r-'.�-'. ter.
.'' • r-.+� ' . ice- •i. -.* }r.. . �- l l i. -"+` µi.-_. • VO
�.
4.
10
• 3• fy s ,■ . , `.�� •ram ,�+ t' '•_�': ,';�•l.• tiff ;ti ��I �J •r- - .� •1' ',��''1'' •. .L ; t.
�s.'! ,¢i•,rf'{ a .1 ti�• .�. :_Y ' :Y��•�•_ �; "+• ITS .t,
r:,. �� ,V �1•r• ' ~'i 1S•..r 'w• la i „+.wA ►y, fr i - ti - '�' --
44.
,t . �� L•• a - .r j
}. 1 •.S: sl:x` r f ,.�� �4 '� '1ij � 1 i jl'.. ✓ti � ".f.t
a�x �'� v� � �.• . ++ �'{ ry '.F �' z- yr�.:. (, •:F � •� + , �•• . ry. 1- •'"r ^� rfrr t - �f� t` ''+�
�• k�r+ 1.•+ 'rA ■ +Z /;.. yam.
�.lh
r� i✓� 7f . f + _ ,L•` a r YAM _T i1'�.. •!>,.,�� `p,. ''y - ✓ � «,� �� �" .. � .. -
..�. i rSl y., •••iT �_. ill �r' tn.a} '-x i•-r a - 'f `. G ' ' wS
.� • t+ 1 ;r' C'~ ' r11 T + 1 .: �'. v - j r �" ti +' _ - r + ;-. _, +.
J L•' � , � � A. + L^ ' ME•!11:.; f �. :•�. jT �.a�J i• "�. • -_ - _ 1: ti .1�•! r' �i-~•iT
`"; � � :.,•' r.. } � ! t. r -�, �• h,,�a�J � r1 ', l'. t. :rx ATE+�•++. ,�. i� ' r + ✓ "'. '� �� ' +�"� }+v �.1
= a. fir.: .! t;'"' :r �" ,._,,�, ► r ry
� " .•■Ifs � � �� .� �• .4..'ti � � + ,t .�. .' •�+ .� •r r �� rr ,� �f:•'+• + .�if ,.7:^
• µ� �1 i �y }l .. f iV„s S'*rr•n y', or:: f�. .7 - �• �,, �: l: r .►1�. .rj,
• �ti +1.� �i` "'f - i. t,t 1►,• Y' \ 1a7ti • Ih'�i 4: 1 i jJn , t•A.
t •..� i y,�rr ^ - .�l16 Y ti'»_: 1i^ .4. .+. • 4 '' .� ., .�'� Orly �y iJ-S- r. .,tir «I. .it! L i {. • T=- '� r, r1• .�-.• `+ .�,�ti rti� y'•' T• •, y 1,•r • . •�,;j w• ' ��i14 .t''�.. r�,.r:J }% 'Yj
..- titi .•'. f Fl `y�`� ? jf •r�j3 (fir I �S;.L "J' ...'-` , {�� iti.'j 1' �:t,,��.y • :''��I�'.S-=i►t 'i•'' :, `C r �_ = �i _ •.IF
tim
aS [ : ty '�` '•�[• Fj. #r �'#�1� /' z`)r • ; �l �_ tii '+'F:Yr �;., s f ..•� i ; r� I • h : r �t
.��G G t ■.y M a t S /4 }va i'. s C f r
� i 1� yi• l L. [,•'Kr,.• f t�;�'�f r.-r 1. - •� , _ fir. •7 � �• _ ,r•�.
.,�- 4'i� t �.�v+�•L�l�: ��d •' �S %^•i�'rj�f,� / .. j6 1 1'y '• �� l�f i� 1�+� �".�•J• , }r', •�•-• t ix � {k� •�� •� r _
(• .�• L 'f+9 -��Ji �f�, Iryi%' !}y'' • y � •��CT �.. ri•�•fl r. L� Ei(. fy ••t� r• :�• "1f V '• .. . ,'tf
{ •' i��,/•y�t L b �.. t yyr'.� , -•,•, 'iy. + • njjlr i Yi •4. � ` s• R-r. 1 . + „ J -• i. . - t
�• :•+.�i• #��'yt�1 ri y{• ��F�F{.l43•}ft •>,. fit• �4 r`+wa. !_; '�i'ir !r. ��.'� ' . •"r" {'. `;'4 y�•�t•, ' 'y,� yry
••■ �.. r •.. \ • S• •� i• ,:� i�V'"F f'R• .'�w ` :`• 4r ��• ~-T+.r�l!� .�'1p �`p •L' ir'4 Jp ;r,VA
r a `r ., Yr - ••�'r
1r� . + t , � ti a r�• '� ► { � ,� ' y, iy. • : 1 . ti , `, Is.'` r• �' . _ ` , • r
�,- Ar .:!• „1�:.' ''' .r �,� � ' :fAr. ,►,.. Jw.� � S•�Jr'•iS',..'S ■'I.t •,L'-•�, + '. +-
. .. �• ' �•7.►�7-r. . f - r ♦ ••,�L`��r.t �t '� r�1-i. .•S •I,r.r.L b:� 1'7. �i; ~"a 7,�7 : �; Bey �-W
t it « r _ .1'+- _"'�f4,v4^ts`'1,�., ..• �Lil•ur•i'C •', ,�r` !r� , y, y ref •,�
� 1 } r' , � , ry � a• r+iR .a.., -« ^. �y,+j��k"•' S •M r •+ � �• •'� 'V; � ,1 � -. r • �'�
' . .. •'1- �•`i+ -L3. �rnr ,,� -�• t �, �-,..-�-1_ �'it� ���% tr _,� Z t+ '�•f'� tii•2 �' . ►.--� �_ r Fri
_ t �tti \2f �T `r r ,. r�� r y �, -'` � � y r r ••, �,` `•,�' ys..� �i+
'�I• jr�'(1�lSh w41�''�y;'•';■�. r ..'I: !�}`��;�'•�� I•. i �r •�. •rs..4: r�4ra<• '
..? , -. ',..fY .; r :i `'�;4 �...-�,* i��sk rr Far 1 r. t ' �' Z r• ` ) * "?+\•. "�
�11r : y' . ,'v F ; , • rr 1'{ :+si,y'* #r} `, r �' ' f.'*r tiaLirFr! ` •'i,. `�' ��. _ �' S +1.
�t y '�.�• • , i„ t• na ,•, �1. �, �+:1r•,•- .,r rl{. � r�r i H' =t���:' �; 7 ,� � •� i • ?
}r'► •' r y ly_+r i' ,'�; `5+� r •' •+ C. '► '} 1'ti•..Jilr, /* -.a •�' 'rr.. •' `.• ►
10
+�■. � rri• '� . ti-a• r �' '. 'r• r r r aY,` �yr��'' •r ' •�a+FTL - ••�,
O l� .r • �(j, � 1 � J
�l. T, � ..• �'. '•' � � y•�•1' r ••. yy, •. �: r 'x �' i i by � • 1 ■' •.r i }! - � •t
•r• e#, �• K~f 'y}4I L`+{ ;►�.,6 1• i�•y'ry �.ti 1r,.: b, Y ��•� � ,�s 1. 'i ,► -..:�', �. I�., pJ
ir
46
,r • ,y,` ,: j r.1 ri 'w. A!.' .-i 1. Y.;� 'tyi iY 4j
V.
•�� 41 1. � wy. i� � .M •1. • • . , 1 a _ � • , r • ,Y� ��••� ••�.�/ ►F�++'-MMMfII ,�� �� li (,l' r � �',. i+5� J,�,Y+'.� �-.+� _��i� 4 .�G �• ��'� �
r •� ' .• ' r . .� r�l'r....• 4 +. i a �
��` • r}a 'r• ' 3 tIL 1 Scx�► �rrrrx :►" L4I. i r,r��• •Y,�jR7L'•r; L'•t `, r

of Visit O Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review a Lagoon Evaluation
for Visit d Routine a Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 4119I2002 Time: 1p00
I Facility Number 2.5 08
l
O Not O erational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted 0 Certified 9 Conditkmally Certified 13Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..••...•.•..••
Farm Name: Rim=1 W.FAnas.................. County: Cj. &y.ea........................... ............ W? aRQ........
OwnerName: C2tlCsm...... .....-_.................... Ames ............. ............. .... ........ ................. Phone No: 751-244 402....----------..------...........---•....................
Mailing; Address: 6M.Riser.Rd..........................
FacilityContact: ........................................ Title:................................................................ Phone No: ...... ............. ...............................
Onsite Representative: CaresInAunm................... . Integrator: MnMhy.„Famid}.Faairx ... ..................................
Certified Operator: Jel%xx.v............. - ..... _.•_- Jam .............. _...... -- Operator Certification Number:.) Q29 ....
Location of Farm:
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately +
d.S miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ' 16 ®�� IG)ngitude F44
Design Current
Deiign- Current
Design, Current
Swine - Cniacity Population
Ponitry
Capacity- Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
1E]
❑ Dairy
N Feeder to Finish
3672
3672
Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
...
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑�
❑ Farrow to Finish
...............
Design Capacity
3,672
❑ GiltsTotal
Total S5 LW
495,720
❑ oars
R
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present U0 Lagoon Area Sprat/ Field Area
Holding Pon& l Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes N No
Discharge ori&aled at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is obwr-ed- was the conveyance man-made? ❑ YLs ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yeti_ notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is obscr%,4 what is the estimatcxi flow in gal/min?
d. I)o s discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, uolifv DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence ofpa_st discharge fi-orn any part of the operation? El Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (fi-ceboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑Yes ®No
5truclure I 5tructrue L Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier.......................... ....................................
Fr ebowd (inches): ...............32..

0510.3101 Continued
Facility Number: 25—ti8 Date of Inspection 4/19/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, [I Yes N No
seepage, e(c.)
6. Are there structures on -site which arc not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plea? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the stt ucturcs need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged marker~ with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
N No
Waste Application
I0. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pouding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Dverload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda {1 fay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility nerd a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Doe's the receiving crop need improvemcnt?
❑ Yes
N No
I&
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
I &
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WCIP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie! irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with my applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23.
Did Reviewerl[nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24.
Does facility require; a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
IO No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit, You w111 receive no further correspondence about this visit.
�vtnments,{re#er;ty. tivn #):�Explam:any YES: answers'andtor..any, reeoutmendatwns'or.any vtlter oomi�aents: ':'. ',
r.....- ........e_. 5.-..}...,..-..:=..-mom—. - __ ..............,..,------ - - ...x...a.x....,a......,F..� -
......—...... - ..-..-xr ....
Uae'drawengs of:facilrty. „batter:egplaut'situa#ions.. qse additional pages'as necessary)yW' _ y Fie1 d C Final Notes
.....,......^--
*Soil test dated 119102 this soil testis for 2001 crop year - no lime required. Cu and Zn within guidelines. Remember to take soil test for
2002 and follow lime requirements.
*Mr. Jones in process of installing new lilt pump as primary pump. According to Mr. Jones, Jimmy Fields with Craven SWCD advised Mr.
Jones not to install pipe in lagoon wall more than 19". Be sure to back fill and power tamp. Reseed area to establish veg.
*New waste analysis taken on 4/10/02 no result,,.
*Waste analysis dated 2126/02 nitrogen is 2.3 lbs/1000 gallons
10/10/01 nitrogen is 1.5 lbs/1000 gallons
Reviewer/Inspector Name Martin INcl:awhorn'.-.- : -. _ -- -__-- .. --- —
Ravinw•orRnr�*nr C:.r..�f..m. ila*n.

05103101 Continued
lraciiitr Number. 25-08 Date of Inspection 4119/2002
Odor issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
2T Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters. etc.)
31. Do the animals feud storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
level is recorded weekly.
are complete and balancad.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No

WAr�R
Q�
To: Producer
From: Daphne B_ Cullom
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2001
wRRL--�'
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced
facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that_ (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
q) The maximum waste level in lagoons/starage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
cp An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recaxntnended by the soil analysis
of The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wastelsoil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility ownerimanager in chronological and iegible form for a
minimum of three years.
cp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no rase shall land Mpli cation rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PANT rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during anV riven application.
(p All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate rapacity to prevent pouding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
cp It is suggested not a repuirement, to keep crop yield information for fitture use to update your waste management plan.
You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine.faeiiity that has a disdwge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-
6481, ext 321 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: win<[]
DBC Niles
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC Z7889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

i
Type of Visit d Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up a Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: fi-5-2tilil Time: lI:3U am Printed on: 7/2/2003
Facility Number 25 08
FORNot O erational O Below Threshold
® Permitted E3 Certified ® Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
FarmName: WYAM.EtwE.arm .................. ........................................................... I....... County: Cm..eii........... ................................... WORN. ........
OwnerFlame: CA rsoa.••• ...........•••........,funcs............................................................ Phone No:=.244.-10Z............ .............. ..............................
Mailing Address: 6305.RiyAr.Rd.••...... ......... ............................. ........ •••-...... Yiamceb..91MAC........ -••••..................... ................ 28586 ............
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative. CamolA, toa.............................................................................. Integrator: MuMhy..Ya[piE,Y..kartns........................
Certified Operator: jeffen .................................... JAM........... ...................................... Operator Certification plumber:JQ29.............................
Location of Farm:
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately
2.5 mules west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. v
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 16 ' 09 u Longitude 77 • 13 6 44
. ......... ..... --- -- -
e u nt ----- Design::::Current.€:`
u nt ': ::'':':!;; .D si C rye
:..:................ .: ...... ..�:.....,,::,,,:-
:::
°:Ca ac ...Pv ulatian Poultry;; ;;:''::.'::::Capacity:' Population::::: Cattle. ::--:: - ;'.Capacity:: Population' '.
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
3672
3672
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Di%eharyes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, K as the conveyance reset -made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Stare'? (If yes, notiA- DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estirnated flow in gallruisr?
d- Does discharge bypass a lagoon swstetn`-! (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from an part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structuue ? Structure 3 Stricture 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ....................................
Freeboard (inches) :...............37...............
i\ -
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Stricture 6
j

031u-vul
Facility Number: 25 — 08
Date of Inspection (>-5-2001 Printed on- 7/M00I
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancerunprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctums lack adequate, ganged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste AppUcation
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
l I . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12, Crap type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? 0 Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reuuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with ou-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. 1
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
oil analysis 5/2000, lime ticket in files.
Baste analysis 4/16/2001, 2.4 lbs./1000 gals.; 1/12/2001, 2.0 lbs./1000 gals.
reeboard levels maintained per General Permit.
rigation records complete with nitrogen balance.
r:
Rer ewe ns ector r1I Name
Dap
1
Reviewer/Insnector Signature: Date:

O5103101 Continued
Facility Number: 25—OB pate of inspection (r5-200i Printed on. 7C O01
j
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the coufinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
24. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
■ ►-Wi
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No

!Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification ❑ Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: 2I20�4fOt T1me: 9:30 Printed on: 615r2001
25 08
Q Nut D erational Q Belo►►- Th resbold
®Permitted © Certified ® Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: Mkra..Eftc..Fa1Ctll.9............................................. .................................. ....... County-: ................................................. ..........
OwnerName: Cstrson............................••----..jones.................................................... ........ Phone No: =244-I4R2................----...........-.................----.....
Mailing Address: 63.G5.Hier.Rd................................................ ............................... vmcclzox:a.NC............................ .......................... awfi .............
FacilityContact: ......................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
p ........... .., .... Integrator; M r'.pity..F.Mlil,F..Farnn................... ©nsite Representative. Rn�..lAmc.�.......................... ............. ................... ................
Certified Operator:jc9ca............................... ..... JI)m ................................................. Operator Certification Number- .1k329 ...... .......................
Location of Farm:
arm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 140 approximately �
2.5 miles Rest of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. T
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 16 09 w Longitude 77 ' 13 44
Design' Current
.- . Design Cu-rrent "..
Current
Swine Capacity Po ulation
Poultry
-
.. . Cattle -•Design
Ca acitrPoe
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ haver
❑Dairy
® Fectler to Finish
3672
360-0
❑ Non -Laver
❑ Non -Dairy
El Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
10 Offier
❑Farrow to Finish
Total Design- Capacity
3,672
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
495,720
❑ $oar.
Number of Lagoons 109 Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
HoldingPonds l Soliid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management S►'stem
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a- ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is obsLi-ved, did it reach Water of the State? (if c:s. no lifv DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, -Meat is the estimated floe in ealltnna?
d- Docs discharge hypass a lagoon s►•stcm`? (If yes, uotiN DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the Statc other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure: 3 Structm-; 4 Structure 5 Sinicturc 6
Identifier: ..._..........................................................................................................................................•.........................
Frecboard (inches) : ............... 33............... ............ I ...........
0

05103101
Facility Number: 25--36
Date of Inspection 1 2/20/2DD1 printed on: 6/512001
Confinued
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6- Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions"was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need. maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other- than waste structures require maintenancelimprovcument?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Oversecd
i 3'. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14, a) I3oes the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a ►gettable acre determination?
15. I)oes the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19, llocs record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation. freeboard. waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
2 L Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge. freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewerd"pector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will receive no further correspondence about this visit-
.....:.... a..,..:.:.........................:s..,�:..._.........,..�:,, :.....e...............-..�;•F• _ _ . ..: ..... ... �........ ,.::.,.. �...: '...::� ::�: ...::�..,.,� emu, .•.'a;;;�;:,::c•�....::.'
Comrnetuts (refer ta-.g�testton. : ;.Egplstist'any YES' answers..andfor.sut'recon"neudations.or.any,atlier;comments:°> =
-: dUsedi?s:of to;staationa{is-
wneceasx
_:::::::::- Field Co �Final Note
.......,,::s
* Waste analysis dated 9/14/00. Nitrogen is 0.93 lbs11000 gallons on #2285 and 0.89 lbs11000 gallons on #2286. On 5/24/00 nitrogen was
1.4 lbs11000 gallons on 42285 and 1.3 lbs/1000 gallons on #2286.
* New waste analysis taken on 2/15/01. No results. When results are received. use to balance PAN for smallgrain over -iced.
* Soil test dated 5126100. Lime applied at recommended rates. Lune receipts on site. Remember to take soil test for 2001.
* Lagoon level being recorded weekly as required by Permit.
* WM records are complete and balanced.
* Discussed IRR2lwaste analysis scheduling.
Y�
_-__ .._...—.: .:.....:: — -
- --..--
Reviewerltnspector Name Martin Mct:avwlioe tt :.= - entered by Della' Robbins ' _..
Reviewer/Inspector Sieniture: Date:
r

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit @ Routine O Complaint O Fallow up O Emergency Notification O Other © Denied Access
Facility Number 2$ 8 Date of Visit: 1113Q12000 Time: $:OQ Printed on: 11/3012000
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ■ Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified Q Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .................
Farm Name: lialYM.Edge.FaEMS....................... .. County: Cr;ayjrA......................................... ..... W.aRQ........
Owner Name: C;ofrSo:n....................................J.0jacs .................................................... .. Phone No: 252.-Z&4.-J,40j ............................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: 6305.Rimcr.Rd...................................................................................... Y.A11CCjaQx.Q.NC................ ........... ................. ......... zaslaf1..............
Onsite Representative: QXSQ10.jRIRCS.............................................................................. Integrator: iY].u]Cphy.F.Q1Rllily.. F4r.m s.........................
Certified Operator: J.C[k l..C................................1.ItxC&................................................. Operator Certification Number:l63.29... ..........................
Location of Farm: _
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400
approximately 2.5 miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle [I Horse Latitude 35 • l6 09 Longitude 77 •F 13 ' ®"
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freebaard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 5
Identifier: ......................................................................•................................... ........
Freeboard (inches): 48

5/00 Continued on back
Facility Number: 25-8 Date of Inspection 11/30/2000 1 Printed on: 11/30/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
5. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Bermuda Small Grain
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
i1Ta viaTations:ar deficiencies wer e;nnted -during this visit t You will receive no further
: correspondeinee about this -visit.. ..: :. :: ::: _ _ :: :::.:: ... .
II need to get a waste sample to cover late November waste applications.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Reviewer/Inspector Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall f
IV: --- a...._. r�.�

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5/001
I IPI����I ■ li 11� 1� A��I - �Y - � �
Facility Number: 25-8 Date of Inspection 11/30/2400 Printed on: 11/30/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
34. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
n
VOO

-.
• _ r.. - �- - . _ 0 Division of -Water Quality -
-., -.- •. Q Division of Sail and Water Conservation
-
P _- Q ()user Agency
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint ❑ Follow up Q Emergency Notification Q Other 0 Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: jI-3�- Ot7 Tim�-ave. Piinted on: 7/21/2000
S
Q Not O erational Q Below Threshold
El Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..............
'
FarmName:......................k. %................>...-........ .................................. - County. ........... .......C.,< A .....................-.............
Owner Name:..... .................. C4:r.k?.^.......... .Y[.?.!!GCS.............................................................. Phone No: ... -..................
Facility Contact:
:Nailing Address:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:.. ..... - .� e rf
Location -of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattte ❑ Horse
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator: --- ........ FF
Operator Certification Number:
Latitude ! t • 4 [f Longitude �' �< "
Design Current
;_::. Ca Po ulada1
x.
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish G7 2 d J Z
x` Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
r;
_ Farrow to Finish
44' : Gilts
Soars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Ca act Pa ulation Cattle Ca - a Pa"tiara
❑ Layer Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I0 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
.Ntaibt r of LagSubsurface Drains Present Lag on Area ILI Spray Field Area
Traps - Iaofltting Ponds 1 Sand - .. ❑ Na Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Mo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-madc? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State' (If yes, notify DW Q) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c- If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gathnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon systent? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes allo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes J4 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes RNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......... �................................................... ............................ --....-....... -....-.................... .............................
Freeboard (inches): f {�
5100 Continued on ba-.

Facility Number: 2-5 — $ Date of Inspection - 3 aJ Printed an; 712112004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require main ten ance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Lel-_'�
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes R No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 14 No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ®No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
15No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
IS No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
(5 No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
{ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
F3No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
E5No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
VN❑
El.�Vo yi�l ticiris:or deficiencies -were noted• d>Wkig Oils -visit • X60 will teeeiye pia /Further
-co rrespondence. a)b' ' f this visit_
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any. other coitnments, M ':
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additioAal.pages as necessary'):
V; I i nax� -i-a Sr4
V1.c„4'0.-5
r, vim, le 5-a•yali e- 4, ir,,ref
1.4a lv w, wwsle
A
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
&k *,U-.
j.
Z�
Date: 5100
a

Facility Number: �s — Date of I11spection Il- ao J Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
No
29.
Is there any evidence oI wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
E9 No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
J� No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
9No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes [:]No
Additional omments and/or rawings:
A.
5100

IType of Visit O Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit *Routine Q Complaint ❑ Follow up D Emergency Notification ❑ Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 7-12-211DD Time:
Facility Numher 25 13
Q Not ❑ erational 0 Below Threshold
N Permitted © Certified ® Conditionally Certified 13Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .......................
Farm Name: Riyrn._Ed=.Ealr w........----••....................................................... Count.: Cxa►:en........................ ►?YaHi........
OwnerName: C,tenon................................... jows ............................................................ Phone No: 2.,51724.4-3QZ........... ........................ .._....................
FacilityContact: ...................... Title: ...... ............. ........................... .................. Phone No: ................ ......... ....... ...............
....
Mailing Address.6305.1iiver-Rd ...............................
Onsite Representative: CainitltAonea.............................................................................. Integrator. Mtwpb}„Fami1y.Fan'mts........... .............. ............
Certified Operator. 3effleiT..C.............................. dDAft-•-.............................................. Operator Certification Number: .16.329...... ................ .......
! Aacation of Farm:
Farm is located off NCSR 1400 in Craven County. Farm entrance is located on the southern side of NCSR 1400 approximately
2.5 miles west of the intersection between NCSR 1400 and NCSR 1443. qr
N Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 1 35 09 Longitude F 77 ` 44
� wtne
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrrnr to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design. ` :.Current:. -....:.: Design :::Current Design..:... Current.
Poultry Ca self Po ulation Cattle Capaefty Po elation. -
❑ Laver ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Laver I❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,572
Total SSLW 495,724
Number of Lagoons 1 ® Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ® Spray Field Area
HoldingTonds i. Salid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? []Yes N No
Discharge origiutatcd at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. II'discharge is ohwsr►'iA n'as the con►re►'attce man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed_ did it reach Water of the State? (If res. uotifv DWQ) ❑yes ❑ No
c- If -discharge is obsen•ed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system!? (If yes. notify ❑WQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yeti N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'' ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
SU-ucture i Sintcture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Sinrcturc: 5 Structure f
Identifier........... rimaM........................................... .................................... ......................... ................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ...............4f]...............

5/00 Continued on hack
Facility Number: 25-8 Date of InspLetion 7-12-2U04
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees_ severe erosion_ (-]Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improve-ment? ❑ Yes ® No
9, Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Anliraution
10. Are there ant• buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pending ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Ckvrseed
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application"
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) rl-his facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvurnent?
❑ Yes
® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate Waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required
Records & Deecument
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18-
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design_ maps. etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard. waste analysis & sail sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20.
is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge- freeboard problems_ over application)
[] Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24,
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
No violations or"deficiencies were, noted during this visit. You r01—receive no further :�-
corres ondence about this visit.
.... ......... ...... _.. �.....::................. ...._ � ...,.... .,,,-
'answers anwl r.:,Anv:.recommendations ar--auv:ol
..................
�� ...... .::..
to 6etf et#ua#roti d al
Use dru of faetl:ts . er.e lain. s- use ad utter es as n sears =
* Last waste analysis dated 5-24-00 at 1 L lbs/1000 gad. Previous report dated 3-6-00 at 1 A Ibs/1000 gall
* bast soils report dated 5-26-00 with up to 1.6T/acre time needed - appplied 1.5 T/acre on 6-20-00. Receipt in records.
* Lagoon level records complete
* Waste plan dated 8-25-97 with an overall PAN defiieit of 181bs. Irrigation records are complete. Have technical specialist rxheck
acreage for field 3. Plan shows field at 18,87 acres but in iRR2 using 18.2 acres. No back-up information available for irrigation system
* Continue efforts to re-establish grass on dike walls (grass is filling in)
* Can remove tarps from all flush tanks - no longer required
Re►lewer/Inspector Name - -

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: $100 l
Facility Number: 25-8 Date of Inspection 74250-00-
Odor issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of Hind drift during Iand application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
24. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts. missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate weer? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/teinporary- cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
- _.._..........
�r :r::r:.::...::....... _..:::......... m...
A rtron anrmen#s and/or. s:-..;_...;�'�:w:-.�_::::.::::.r,.:.::......,----•- ••-----............ --
* Following Hurricane Floyd, Carl Dunn with DWQ requested Mr. Carson keep pumping volumes for inundated structure. Information
is contained in lagoon level records.

Facility' Number Date of Inspcction :..
Titne of ln�'pectioII :•,. � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted p Certified ■ Conditionally Certified p Registered 0 of perattotta Date Last Operated:
48
Farm Name: RWetrs.Edge.Farms .................................................................. County: Craven WaRO
th�ner Naine: Carson...................................jj)nes ........................................................... Phone No: ?52.24.4-1402....................... ...... ........... ....---.....
......
FacilityContact: ..................................... ....... ........................ ......... _Title:........... ................... .............. ................... Phone No:
Nlailing Address. £i 0.River...Rd........................ ........... ................. .................................. .Y.ancebnra.NC..... ............... ....... ............ ............... 2858fa....... .......
Onsite Representative: alr-ff outs ............... .. ..... .. .......... ... Integrator: Murphy .Fwroilly.Earrns......................................
Certified Operator: effery...C_......................... .tones.................................................. Operator Certification NuIII heI-:1029.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©•� ®�° Longitude ©• ©
a
_.: estgn' . .. Current.: -.
Swine:.. Capacity ' Population . Poultry
13YFan to keeder--
® ee er to k tnts
[3 Farrow to can
[3 Farrow to Fee er
p Farrow to Finish
Gilts
F• E,.
Boars
p Layer
r.
0 N on- Layer
.,Design —Current Design Current
Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p airy
p on- airy
p ter
Total Design Capacity,3,672
Total.SSLW9S,72D
�' u sur ace. rains resent oon Area ra ie rea
k
Number of Lagoons n ® A 3:
-:.Holdin Ponds'1•Solid Traps iqui -.. aste anagement ys em
I]ischaK4s& Sty? Impact
1. Is'any discharge observed from any part of the operation? •E3 Yes p No
so_ -
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon ZI SpralkField p Other
a. Ifdischarge is observed, was the conveyance man=made? p Yes p Na
b. If discl�arge* observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notiA, DWQ) Yes p No
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow.in galfntin?
a,
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon svMetn? (If yes, notify DWQ) :� p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past dis(;karge from any part of the operation? Yes p No
3. Were there any adverse impacfs or potential adverse imp acts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? f7 Yes p No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard 'pius.storm storage) less than adequate? p *illway p Yes p No
Structure 1 Stntcntre 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures obseryed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
Arta. seepage, etc,)
p Yes p No
3/23/99 x'. Continued on hack

Facility Number: 25-8 I):ite of 1asIwo ir�6 9129/99
b. Are there structures on -site which;are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
p No
(If any of questions 4-5 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
p No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Na
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
[]Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
p No
t 1. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN..
❑ Yes
❑ No
12, Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ wimbose designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
E3 Yes
[]No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
[]Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
p No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? y..
p Yes
p No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in'"i�ct at the -time of design?
p Yes
p No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?'; '
❑Yes
p No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General'Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) '' '^''.6'
: ❑Yes
❑ No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on. representative. : ❑ Yes
p No
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cayse noncompli r of the Certified AWMP? _}gyp Yes
p No
.
Cr : Io:Vinhatioix �r. nficiencres:here naotcd :during: this visi vu ivil receiV.. . .
.further
nor're {' idence bnutahis:�isxt::: ± :.:.::::" ..• :..:..:.:.. - ..:.:.:....:.
.• �
Commen fer- _n<gaestioif #j �ExpIa " _ny YES`answers'and/or any ommendations:or. any other comme777�_
:..
_
�.-
_•.
Use draw afRfllit to;better ex lain:sttuatiuns. use.additionaT' a es�s'necessa _
-
dequaOstructure integrity. *.:._
Ilowable maximum lagoon level: 25 inches
Maximum operating level: potential
Storm impact=to lagoon: flood waters saturated outside wall; approximately 98 inches from top; duration approximately
one week.
Flood water originated from Meuse Bash/lower lagoon to 25 inches and operate at that level until further notice.
Astation submerged but now operable.':?l:. =' S1E PAGE 3
Revi'ewerAmpector Name Sgd-Dunn ' Entered.by Ann Tyndall _ .:..
Reviewer/inspector Signature: t r Date:

[Facility N um er: 25_8 Ihale of Inspection
Oder lsstiq
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below p Yes p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? []Yes p No
28.
is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
p Yes
p No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
p Yes
p No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (Le. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
p Yes
p No
3 1,
Do the animals feed storage b• s fail to have appropriate- cover?
p Yes
p No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a subyerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
p Yes
p No
- - - - -
Irrigation/application system operable.
AL
Field currently flooded; percentage unknown.
Records available and complete.
Current lagoon level: 18
1000 animals lost.
Operate at 25,inches until further notice.
Did have
some -slumping ❑n,wall and some sites where
anigials rooted. Repair
when possible.
ell
y'
rug i[
L•
s
r
a
•
r
•

(] Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
® Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
0 Other Agency - Operation Review
Routine O Complaint 0 Fullom-up of DWQ inspection 0 F(►lio,,►-up of DSAN'C rcyich- 0 Other
Facility Number 25 g Il:!te of fn,l!ecrirn i-4-99
Time ref Inspection 1515 24 hr. (hh:mm)
M. Permitted ' Certified K, Conditional)% Certified Registered JE3 Not O erationaE Date Last Operated:
Farm Dame: its,iym.Esiur-F.ums.................. .._.........................._................................ Counts-: ...............................
O►rnerNamc:: C,i;ISAxL.... ...._................... ,3Qnc5.......................... Phone No. .24.4-1 Qz-...._.............
Facility Contact.----••........................................................................Title: .
Maiiing Address: GHQ_;jUi:>'S.Sd....................
Onsite Representative: C#I, QIt.,.RIRrs ..................................
................................................ Phone No: ..........
--•..... I N.."Ancehox aAc................ -•••••...... ...........
.............. WaHQ........
........... 285.6.............
................. Integrator: Murlilt�:.Fa R11:. ��7g0.�--...---•--.......
Certified Operator:Je$en,-...0......... ..................... JD.i1._..............................._-........._... Operator Certification Number.16329........_.._....._...........
Location of Farm:
Fay.is.lacat�dstff.I�C�A.I��Q.iuu..�x'exert.�uunt,�:....karm.entr�ce.is..located.s►n.tlxc.xQttthern.xirle.sti:�EIGSS.l.�D11'_�aplraasima�tel�:.'
2.i 3auile�.xvesx.Qf ib!e.iutteirsectian.bct►keen. CSS.I Ii[!.a!naf Ni[ SB.14�3_.................... ............................. ............................ .................................
�
Latitude 35 '• ' 16 09 L incitude ! 77 1 ` 13 44 ?�
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
SHine Capacity Population
Poultr
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Laver
❑ Dain'
® Feeder to Finish
3672
1600
JEJ Non-I.aver
ID Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
j
❑ FarrorA• to Feeder
❑ Other
In
Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
3,572
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
495,720
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 0 ®_Subsurface Drains Present 7 Lagoon Area ® Spra,, Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management Svstem
& Srreani Jn3nacrs
l - Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
17i i❑ IAgoon i 1 Spray Field i 1 Dther
:!- li di�cllar �c i, niuc,� �[!. ���, tli:: oil�-c; aiic� rttar!-ittnn_''
h. 1f di:::iiarg: i� orti.n:d. did i[ r:a.:h u atcr of the Stau" (1_•; c - iiotiA 1)IVQ1
c. L''di�.h.Er2e i, ob,-_n-cd.;�ual i the c�:iiillalcd fk)v, iri ,al-iiin"
d. =7cr , discharge h..l}a.:: 1:12001! S-1 tn" {if e _ n:uif%- 1.)%V`]
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pail of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Wactf Collection & TmatmenI
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? LI Spillway
Structure 1 Structure'_ Structur; Structure 4 Structure
1 d:'nufier:.................................... .............. ..................... ........... -•--•-----•---..............................
Ire;:tuoard (iricbLcs).. .............. a ........................... .......... ............. ...................... .............. ................................... .....
5_ Are there a v immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion.
seepage.. etc.)
J Yes 2 No
[]Yes Z-i No
❑ Yes Z No
nla
Yes No
Cj Yes No
Ej Yes 9- No
E] Yes Z No
Strli::tlir-e 4
❑ Yes fKi No
;17 1199 Continued an hack

4
FacilitAeumber: 25-8 I)air 4it' Inspection
5+99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ►►'aste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvemcnt?
❑ Yes
N No
8. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenauce/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
N No
NVaslee AtiltlichtHoot
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
N No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hav) Small Grain Dyerseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
N No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Reauireei Rrcords & J)wcuments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
I & Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP_ checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
2 L Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems. over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agenct°?
❑ Yes
N No
25- Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
13. -Nti violations or deficien-des'were noted.during this visit: You will receive no further - "-
corres ondence about this visit. -
Comments (refer to question #), Explain any -YES answers andfor any recommendations or and• other comments.
Use drawings"of facility to better explain situation. (use additional pages as'necessary): Records available available for review. Irrigation. waste, soil and freeboard records are up to dale.
Plan to cut and bale the oats as soon as it dries out.
Mayo & Associates designed the waste management system and the WUP was written in accordance to this design.
Extenders have been installed and flush tanks have been covered. The waste goes thru a lift station and waste enters the lagoon at the
surface (splash has been eliminated) instead of below- because the risk of back -flow from lagoon into the lift station and/or houses which
could result in a discharge. Practice weed control in sprayfields and on dd,-e wall upon need -
Continue your efforts to establish vegetation on dike wall.
If you alive any questions. please contact me at 252-946-6481. ext. 318.
Y
Reviewer/ins or Name -
1� L►•n B. Hardison --
ReviewerlinsaectorSianature:�J Date:

Di-;isioii of Soil and. Water Conservation -' Dperution Review. _ -
0
[3Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection, _
f
_...
® Division of. Water Quality - Compliance Inspection; .
F
f
0 Other Agency - Operation Review
Je Routine Q Com laint Q Follo►s--up of l)WQ inspection O Folloa-up of DSMIC review• d Other
Facility Number Zs B
Dale of InspectiOil
l,inae of Inspection J St S 24 hr. (hh:mm)
12 Permitted a Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered JEJ Not O erational Date last Operated:
Farm Name: t:iartnty:
.....� r?:�".:'......................................�i:E�
..... �......%................................................................
OwnerNanse: Y�....................... .............................. Phone No:....................... .. � � �.r...�.� ...............
FacilityContact : ................................................. • .__._..............Title: _ ...................................................... Phone No:
4lailiasl Address: .......�i..i1-t �".......�...................................................... ... 1���� r��............... N.G................ . ' g.
Onsite Hepresenttitire:..... �.la'` T&., .s. Integrator: ik
......4=..............................................................
Certified Operator: el—kex.-.y..
j ...... Operator Certification Number: ... f4�.,,,r�,7?q..............
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 • 4 Longitude 0 • ` "
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
36 72
/�v4
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I EEI
Dairy
❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Nlanagement System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originaicd at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance nian-made''
h. I1- discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. It dlschar�so is observed. what is the estimated Ilwx in gal/min`?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate`?
Su-ucture l Structure 2 structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identi Fier:
Freeboard (inches): ........... 3011 ,
❑ Yes ® No
[--]Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
4-tA-/
❑ Yes
allo
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
9No
Structure 6
1 J6199 Continued on back

Facility Number: 2 S — g Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed`? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed anchor managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelirnprovement?
8. Does any pact of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimproveinent?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, Gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelirnproventent'?
11. 1s there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
12. Crop type
LE Kiil
❑ Yes EfNo
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application`? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving; crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Rcctuired Records & I.locuments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(icl WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss reviewtinspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0 1Vo.�iolations tir. deficiericit�s .were nc>fed during Hits i isit:. You wil..rec . i .env further.-.-
.............. - ; • ecjrrespattidei�ce; about; ttsErs i�isit.:. ; : �.:.:...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
❑ Yes Eg�No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes Ox-No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ET No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes 14No
❑ Yes 19No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ETNo
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes [R-Na
Comments (refer.to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments, t
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):;, ^
��.C�r � -�.� •�*�..-- .���P�� . ��. .�a- �c7�--ter-r rx . �iUg-�-- `" �-
emu. .ram ,s� cam-.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Ly► t 1�. %-+�'iy��s�. �5� - �!�-6 . �a �i � r* .c r� �►8
Reviewerllnspector Signature: &44� Date: 1116199

Facility Number Date of Inspection®
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm}
0 Registered Ci Certified 93 Applied for Permit [1 K' mitted 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Naame:., ` .i P A-6 '� +�"� County:
..............................'.............. �--................................. ...............................
Owner Name: ......��<�'° 1 ........................�oA—e.......................................... Phone No:......a,.`�7.��..�. ...::......�. ..... pr .........
FacilityContact: ............................................................................. Title:..---- ...... ................ Phone No: ........ ...................................................................
Mailing Address:.......�G?� �- ... -'.Y .......................... ... ........ �... ........... .�..�....,�'
gib............ _ {..
Onsite Representative: ...Q,... .................. .G..t!................................... lntcgratttr:...VVy,7,.►rfL•V..0
Certified Operator..........:I.0 ' . . . `3.... 1 ...............
P,��. ......---...... ......................... Operator Certification Number:...---.--........ ��
Location of Farm:
Latitude '�• ®' ®" Longitude ' 4 "
Des' Current:
ign: Current
5►�iip�e::: Capacity: Population Poultry Capacity .Population
❑ an to Feeder
❑ Layer
eeder to Finish
`Izz,
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Farrow to Wean
.............
❑ Other
Farrow to Feeder
Total Desi
❑ Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Design Current
Cattle Cappeity Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non-Dairy
n Capalaty.
'otal.5SM
Nuinheir of,Lagoan 1 If lding'Ponds,.
❑ Subsurface Drains Present'
❑ Lagoon Area
ID Spray Field Area
.......::.:
-• :
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
940
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
UN/0
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, diet it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in -al/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
�a
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
R<o
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
EKo
rnai ntenanceli mprove me n t?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time (if design?
❑ Yes
04(
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
No
7125/97

Facility -Number., Jr- —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site: which need to be properly closed?
Structures [Lagotihs.11oldine fonds. Flush Pits. etc.}
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): .............l..Y]...... .................................... ........................ ........... ............. ......................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
Structure. 5
❑ Yes 1'o
❑ Yes
Structure 6
❑ Yes 9� \r}
[7
❑ Yes tio
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes L2N"o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify ❑WQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'? ❑ Yes o
Waste :application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes lid No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type �l D - {..... 4? !'�`S u` `!- ..................... .................. .. �D.l F�l 4 dL
.............................................
lb. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes 9 o
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �Gy<o
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ElYes Lid'No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes UNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes r'No
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative" ❑ Yes [� i!!`o
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes t;,o
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes (1ia
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes E N_ao
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ' ❑ Yes o
[j No. viola tions or deficiencies were noted during this visit.- You will receive no further
correspondence about this. visit., ' . .
CO.(refer to quesiioriE #) A Expiaimany.;YES:answers andlurally recummen tions or any other commentsw;;,::,.,.F. 'u a
-:.
U e'draivings a1 facility io betteeexplai situations (use additional pages'as necessstrr]:
q ka l�] of t` ��c5 ► Acts - 5u— ov%-� 4%_
p"—CA tZt 1rickS
7/25/97
�. :. ... .... ,. .'s i �• s . �, -::: -:. p" :RA ., S` .,,5, ...3:r;` .,2`"�..a.,:,..,:.. hk,. -: � ;,..,eaa,aa,,.
r:
Reviewerfluspector Name �... ``
Reviewerllnspector Signature: C:-2> , Date:
)A—

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered ■ Certified p Applied for Permit ■ Permitted 0 of 0peratEona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Myers.Edge.Farms.••••••...........••••••••-••••...................................... ................ County: Craven WaRO
Owner Name: C wioL...----•-------------••---------... jam ..................................... ....... Phone No: 24.4-3.4Q2.....................
Facility Contact: CarsUnJones........................ .....Title: owner .......... ............................. ........... Phone No: ZS=44-.1.401... -...................
Mailing Address: 005.Rixer.Rd............................ ..... Y.amcebnznNC ........................... ... 2858fi ..............
...................................................... ........................
Onsite Representative: CarsojLJnugs..,l f door,.Twn.mir-sta iggS.............. Integrator: Murphy.)Family.fArms.................
Certified Operator: .Jeffery...0............................. Jmacs.................................................. Operator Certification Number: 1029 ............................
Location of Farm:
srmt.as. ca m.. raxeat.. flatn ....hirm.eq raha,rx.ts a .an. srhu n st e.>Q ........................... .
�? rnximafelx; ;A.%i!cg..►;yest�f.theJoicrsectioxi.bghvxen.XCSR.1400.and. C.SK1443_......................••--------.--•......................................---.-.---�
Latitude ©� ®� 9 Longitude ©0
..... ..,..:........... .._ _ n urren _._,_-�,.— esi n=- urren w,==; _-:.:;;_:__::.;;;; es� n =::-_..urren :..<;;;::
..._..gym.... w.•:-----•= :. �--�--:-• �_-_-.. _ - - .....-.:._:. -
Sw>ne:� __.Capacity PopulatinnJ Poultry ;: TCapac�ty Papuiatton Cattle u Capeelty Populatiflu
-. .-�..
p can to ee er - p Layer p w airy
® ee er to mr [3 Non -Layer 7.113 on- auy
_..._
anew to
er
Farrow�,....,..... _ - -
to a er =_ 0 -
me,.µ _......._.._............._._._ .--..... -� _
13 Farrow to Finish
__. _. _- .: xTatalDesi. Ea-aci3,677
_.
V.
_- _max--�:;;;;_;:=_u -_ :_
P tY
Gilts
-x--- Boars _...... _- _
Y_
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

actfiy Number: 25_8 Date of Inspection 5/12/98
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laoons,Holdina Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1
Identifier: #fl.............
Freeboard (ft): 2.1
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type......UastaMamda.(xtay.]............... mal.Lgmia.nuerseed........ ...........................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20- Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q . o-vio ons.or ckncies'were-mo a wring Is visit. • on. will.receive nu U er .
.:'Cei�> 606nil<i+�eir > Nu[t x i$:visi :.... . - .. • :.....:................ .
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
Structure 6
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
N Yes p No
la Yes g No
p Yes ®No
® Yes p No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
Reviewer/Inspector blame at Hooeer;s
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

j9 rsoutme p t-ompiaint p rouow-up of uwV inspeciion 0 ronow-up or uawt-: review p utner
Facility Number
p Registered 0 Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
[late of
Time of Inspection 12:00 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[Wm[Wmt 0perationa Date fast Operated:
Farm Name: Rkvers.Edge.Farms...................................................................................... County: Craven WaRO
OwnerName: Carson ................................... dnncs... ....................................................... Phone No: 244:1.4.Q2......................................... ........... ..•---
Facility Contact: ----•----•---• ...................................... ..Title:................ ... Phone No:
MailingAddress: fiUkS..Riier.Rd....................................................................................... Y.ancebalra.l c......................................---•............ 28MA ..............
Onsite Representative: Cars[u1..Jancs............................................................................. Integrator:Mn.rpty-Family.Earms..................... -...............
Certified Operator: Jeffery ...C............................. Jones .................................................. Operator Certification Number:1029............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©� ®� ®41 Longitude ©■ ©� ®u
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 0 Yes N No
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? I] Yes W No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No
m aintenancelimprovem ent?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

acr um er: 25_8
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etch
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): 3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
Structure 5 Structure 6
15. Crop type ......Cozstal.Barmada.Grass..........................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17, Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
. oviu ions -or rreneies.were.note ring is visit:. om -receive no er. .
- . �eirXestio��ene� ab�t>ia� xis •v�5i�:: • . � . � . • .................. � :. _ .........: • : � . .
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
El Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
13 Yes ® No
p Yes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name nn R_z.:..,..rN
r _...
M M
ReviewerfInspector Signature: Date:

. ❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
P
-'��-
�•M-
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
'
».
IfoRoutine OComplaint Q Follow-up ofD%N-Q inspection D Follo-*r-u of DS%VC: revfew Q ()ther
Date i&Inspection
LFaci.1ity 'ti'umbcr 2y�
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
rotal Titrte fin fraction of hours.
Farm Status: ❑ Registered []Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min►) Spent on Review
UCertified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Not Operational Date Last Operated:....,..
Farm Name ........................: °.^..... .................a _..--..4 !�e ......... ..--._.._
Owner Name: CToAe5
Facility Contact: ............ C.'If--n............ }°' ...................... Title:......
;Mailing Address..... ...... .......... — ........... ............................. .............
Onsite Representative:,......... Ctt ? ............ ane�
CertifiedOperator:...... ....... C s9 ............. ...... i�.......
Location of Farm:
Countv:.....................................................................................
Phone'No: ................................... ........................ - ........................
............................................ Phone No:......................... ..........................
................................. Integrator:..,...---......---............................................
.. .......... I .................... Operator Certification Number:.........................................
A
........................................................................... ........................................................................................................................ .............................
Latitude • • 94 Longitude. ` i ::
f Type of Operation
Swine
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle "Capacity Population.. -
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
(� �0 ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
El Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Other
I -
Total Design Capacity
Total SSL W
Number g:.of Lagoons l Holdin Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 0 Spray Field Area
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
?. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation!
Diwbanae originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field El Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance than -made?
b. It -discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Wattr:' (1f yes, notify DWQ
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in galln in:'
J. I)nes discltargr bypatis a lagnc�n system'! {If ve,. notify f:3WQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4, Wcre there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than front a discharge'?
5. Does any part of -the waste management system (other than lagoonslholding ponds) require
•i134197
ntai ntenanceli ntpro%•ement''
❑ Yes $No
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[I Yes El No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes )(No
❑ Yes ONO
Continued on back

L
Facility Number:
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design`!
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures [laagoonc and/or l.loldin}; Pondsl
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Stnucture 3
...... Z.................................... I ..............................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application"
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ......2�r!�R��°!
❑ Yes >fNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes XNo
Structure 5 Structure 6
lb. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20- Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities On1�'
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes $ No
❑ Yes No
$Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes Dd No
❑ Yes XNo
XYes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes U No
❑ Yes NfNo
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes b4No
Yes ❑ No
Cammen#s (re#er:ta queshan #}:: Eplatn anyY�S answersandJgr,aoy i<ecorameridatiris oir:any:ofiter.`ccnirricnfs._ a e.ex -
edr3wnof faLt.o. better ez la.t..n..:.s...rt..u.a.t..�nn..s .-. analUsa e.sas necessar.:�
Y.
5r V--y 6..11 rrv�hw, , NA A rep. l r�5M VOL.-. •
R3� I e,.- w/o 'fin -%what jc "4 If;
2N, Va, 4,1_5 o,- ram �o 1. G,;,_5 4o Merck Cr&t.>v PNI6.
_d........_............ w..d
Reviewer/Inspector Name ' '�.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� ft.v..-- � Date:
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97