250007_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS.
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
250007 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS250007
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Craven Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
01/25/2018 Entry Time: 09:00 am
Exit Time: 10:00 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Sutton Family Farm, LLC
Owner Email:
Owner:
Woody A Sutton Jr
Phone:
252-523-0474
Mailing Address: 6309 Wyse Fork Rd Dover NC 28526
Physical Address: 3391 Dover Fort Barnwell Rd Dover NC 28526
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Carolina }coward
Location of Farm:
Farm Location: North SR 1262 Craven Co.
Latitude: 35' 17' 07" Longitude: 77' 21' 46"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Woody A Sutton Operator Certification Number: 17713
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Woody A Sutton Phone
On -site representative Woody A Sutton Phone
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Megan H 5tilley
Inspection Summary:
Calibration due 2018
Waste Analysis 11-28-17 1,25
9-28-17 1.05
7-7-17 .88
5-9-17 1,52
Soil Test 6-28-17 wl highest lime 1.9 tons } apply lime
Cu & Zn values Win range
Sludge Survey 12-30-17 Thick-2.3'
LTZ-5.6' } Need pump intake measurement
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility : Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection date; 01/25/18 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
�"neeeder to Finish 4.320 3,500
Total design Capacity: 4,320
Total SSLW: 583,200
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed pate Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 03/18/92 19.50 2g 00
page: 2

Permit: AWS250007 Owner -Facility: Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 01/25/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit. Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
N9 Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. 0id discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
N9 Nil No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes He Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 10%/101bs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility : Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 01/25/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Sail Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na He
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stacking?
page: 4

Permit: AWS250007 Owner -Facility: Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 01/25/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
Na Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ E
❑
(NPDES only)?
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
[]
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
■ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ 0
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
E ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewhrispection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
[]
E ❑
❑
page: 5

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
250007 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS250007
Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Craven Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
02/02/2017 EntryTime: 10:00 am
Exit Time: 11:45 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Sutton Family Farm, LLC
Owner Email:
Owner:
Woody A Sutton Jr
Phone:
252-523-0474
Mailing Address:
6309 Wyse Fork Rd
Dover NC 28528
Physical Address:
3391 Dover Fort Barnwell Rd
Dover NC 28526
Facility Status:
E Compliant 11 Not Compliant
Integrator: Carolina Howard
Location of Farm:
Farm Location: North SR 1262 Craven Co.
Latitude: 35` 17' 07" Longitude: 77° 21' 46"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Woody A Sutton Operator Certification Number: 17713
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Woody A Sutton Phone
On -site representative Woody A Sutton Phone
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s)-
Inspection Summary:
Calibration Complete 10-24-16 w1 194 GPM
Waste Analysis 1-3-17 1.2
10-27-16 .73
8-11-16 .91
6-2-16 1.2
Soil Test due 2018
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond w1 irrigation
Crop yield complete - some wheat drowned
Sludge Survey due 2017
'Wheat up and good stand
page: 1

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility : Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Hate: 02/02/17 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4.320 4,300
Total Design Capacity: 4,320
Total SSLW: 583,200
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 03/18/92 19.50 30.00
page 2

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility : Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 02/02/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
5. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
D
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
■ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility : Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 02/02/17 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
E]
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
[]
E ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
no
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
No
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
WU P?
El
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility : Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 02/02/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
[]
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ E
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
M ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
M ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ M
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na Ne
2$. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
■
contact a regional Air quality representative immediately,
30, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
(i.e_ discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑0
❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Resources
❑
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number:
250007 Facility Status: Active
permit: AWS250007
❑ Denied Access
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine County:
Craven Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
1211612015 Entry Time: 10:30 am Exit Time: 12'00 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Sutton Family Farm, LLC
Owner Email:
Owner:
Woody A Sutton Jr
Phone:
252-523-0474
Mailing Address:
6309 Wyse Fork Rd
Dover NC 28526
Physical Address:
3391 Dover Fort Barnwell Rd
Dover NC 25526
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Carolina Howard
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35' 17' 07" Longitude:
77° 21' 46"
Farm Location: North
SR 1262 Craven Co.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cal, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Woody A Sutton Operator Certification Number: 17713
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Woody A Sutton Phone:
On -site representative Woody A Sutton Phone
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date-
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility : Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 12/16/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Calibration complete 3-17-15
Waste Analysis
8-31-15 1.18
5-21-15
.92
3-17-15
1.56
9-8-14
1.13
Soil Test 8-4-15 w/ highest lime 1.6 tons ) applied lime
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
Sludge Survey 8-30-14 Thick-3.1'
LTZ-0.8'
Pump intake-4.5'
Crop yield complete
7) manage woody vegetation on lagoon bank
Wheat planted at facility
page: 2

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility . Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 12/16/15 Inpsection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swi ne
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4.320 4,400
Total Design Capacity: 4,320
Total SSLW: 583,200
Waste Structures
Disignated observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 03/18/92 19.50 28.00
page:. 3

Permit: AWS250007 Owner- Facility: Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 12/16/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na He
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4, Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large
❑
� ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Me
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AVV5250007 Owner - Facility : Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number:
250007
Inspection Date: 12/16/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Corn. Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
0
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na He
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑ D
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
m ❑ n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
VVU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility : Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 12/16115 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na We
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
N ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ 0
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
■ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
110
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Me
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
N
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Application Field ❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewertinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
E ❑
❑
page: 6

s
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250007 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250007 ❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
12/03/2014 Entry Time: 10:00 am
Farm Name:
Sutton Family Farm, LLC
Owner:
Woody A Sutton Jr
Mailing Address:
6309 Wyse Fork Rd
Physical Address:
3391 Dover Fort Barnwell Rd
Facility Status:
Compliant Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Farm Location: North
SR 1262 Craven Co.
Inactive Or Closed Date
County: Craven Region: Washington
Exit Time: 11:30 am Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Dover NC 28526
Dover NC 28526
Integrator: Carolina Howard
Latitude: 35' 17' 07"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Records and Documents Other issues
Longitude: 77' 21' 46"
Waste Application
Certified Operator: Woody A Sutton Operator Certification Number: 17713
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Woody A Sutton Phone
On -site representative Woody A Sutton Phone
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis 9-8-14 1.13
6-18-14 1.46
3-20-14 1.73
1-16-14 1.37
Soil Test due 2015
Calibration due 2014
Sludge Survey 8-30-14 Thick-3.1'
LTZ-4.8'
Pump intake-4.5'
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond w1 irrigation
Crop yield complete
`Get new COC & Permit in records
page: 1

Permit: AWS250007 Owner- Facility: Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 12/03/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
❑ Swine - Feeder to Finish 4.320
Total Design Capacity: 4,320
Total SSLW: 583,200
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 03/1 W92 1 g-50 38.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility : Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Cate: 12/03/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWCI)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
5. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
MCI
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
[]
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system Other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)?
0
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
[]
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS250007 Owner -Facility: Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 12/03/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yea No Ha He
Crop Type 1 Com, wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 5
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
M ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na _Me
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have ail components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit. AWS250007 Owner - Facility : Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 12/03/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crap yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
[]
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance'
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
110
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
0
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
N ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

E Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 250007 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250007 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Cra en Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 12/18/2013 Entry Time: 10 34 AM _ Exit Time: 117aO AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Sutton Family Farm, LLC Owner Email:
Phone: 252:�23-6956
Mailing Address: 6265 &se Fork Rd DoverNC
Physical Address: aj91 Qgver Fort Barnwell Rd Dover NC 28526
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: J_G Howard Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'17'07" Longitude: 77°21'46"
Farm Location: North SR 1262 Craven Co.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Woody A Sutton
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 17713
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Woody Sutton Phone:
On -site representative Woody Sutton Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary inspectortsy:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr Facility Number : 250007
Inspection Date: 1211812013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Calibration complete 2-18-12
Waste Analysis 11-7-13 1.36
7-23-13 1.09
5-10-13 1.81
3-6-13 2.05
Soil Test 4-13-12 wl highest lime 1.5 tons } need lime
Cu & Zn values Min range
11 }'Irrigation outside crop window for Soybeans the cut off is 9115 - in future get extension from agronomist
'make sure to record irrigation from 12-17-13
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
"No hogs - just shipped out
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Inspection Date: 12J1812013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250007
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,320 0
Total Design Capacity: 4,320
Total SSLW: 583,200
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon 1 03118M 19.50 26,00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250007 Owner • Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Inspection Date: 1211812013 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Facility Number : 250007
Reason for Visit: Routine
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DVVQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le.l large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
■
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AW5250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Inspection Date: 12/18/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250007
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/101bs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
■
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Lynchburg
Soil Type 2
Goldsboro
Soil Type 3
Norfolk
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
Cl
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
0
❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
VVU P?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250007 Owner • Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr Facility Number. 250007
Inspection Date: 12/18/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? Q
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? 0
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
l■TREEN]
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
Q
❑ ■ Cl
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Q
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AW5250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 12/1812013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250007 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250007 L_F Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Rout ng County: QrslyertRegion: Washington
Date of Visit: 03/12/2013 Entry Time: 10:30 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Sutton Family Farm. LLC Owner Email:
Owner: Woody A Sutton Sr
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6265 Wyse Fork Rd Dover NIC 285268832
Physical Address: 3391 Dover Fort Barnwell Rd Dover NC 28526
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: J C Howard Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'17'07" Longitude: 1'4 "
Farm Location: North SR 1262 Craven Co.
Question Areas:
pischrge & Stream impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat © Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Woody A Sutton
Secondary OICtsj:
Operator Certification Number: 17713
On -Site Representatives): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Woody Sutton Phone:
On -site representative Woody Sutton Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspectors):
Inspection Summary:
Calibration complete 2-18-12 wl 195 GPM
Crop yield complete
Waste Analysis 12-31-12 .94
8-28-12 1.08
6-7-12 1.45 } sent off new sample waiting for return
Soil Test 4-13-12 wl highest lime 1.5 tons
Cu & Zn values wlin range
Sludge Survey extension till 2014
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond wl irrigation
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Facility Number. 250007
Inspection Date: 03/12/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,320 1,817
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Total Design Capacity: 4,320
Total SSLW: 583,200
Designed Observed
Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon 7 03/18/92 19.50 27.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 0311212013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ONOO
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Inspection Rate: 03/12/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number:
Reason for Visit:
250007
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Lynchburg
Soil Type 2
Goldsboro
Soil Type 3
Norfolk
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
Q
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page' 4

Permit: AWS250007 Owner • Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr Facility Number. 250007
Inspection Date: 03/12/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ 0
box{es} below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Nan -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Inspection pate: 03/12/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 250007
Reason for Visit: Routine
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
2& Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Air Quality representative immediately.
M Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page; 6

I
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 250007 Facility Status: Active T� Permit: AW 2 7 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection „ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 04/04/201Z _ Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 11:00 AM _ Incident #:
Farm Name: $Uttgn Family Farm. LLC Owner Email:
Owner: Woody A Sutton Sr Phone: [phone],956 .
Mailing Address. 6265 Wyse Fob Rd _ Dover _NC285268832
Physical Address: 3391 Dover Fort Barnwell Rd _ Dover NC 28526
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: J C Howard Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 7" Longitude: 77°21'46" _
Farm Location: North SR 1262 Craven Co
Question Areas:
0 Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Ji Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Woody A Sutton
Operator Certification Number: 17713
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representatives): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Chase Mackey
Phone:
On -site representative Woody Sutton
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Calibration 2-18-12 wl 195 GPM & 159 GPM
Waste Analysis 1-10-12 1.3
1 9-29-11 1.0
7-25-11 .76
5-9-11 1.7 y just sent off new sample
Soil Test 12-13-10 (2011) wl highest lime 1.6 tons) Lime applied
Cu & Zn values wlin range
Sludge Survey extension till 2014
Crop yield complete
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Facility Number. 250007
Inspection Date: 04104M12 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,320 4,320
Total Design Capacity: 4,320
Total SSLW: 583,200
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
lagoon 1 03/18/92 19.50 25.00
Page: 2

0
Permit: AWS250007 Owner • Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr Facility Number. 250007
Inspection Date: 04/04/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field Cl
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.ed large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
B. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
0013
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? {Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks}
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
MOD
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

0
Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Inspection Date: 04/04/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number:
Reason for Visit:
250007
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Lynchburg
Soil Type 3
Goldsboro
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
fl ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
Cl
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
HE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have al components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 04/0412012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other'? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0130
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Inspection Date: 04/04/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 250007
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
2& Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Air Quality representative immediately.
34. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e_, discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Q
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250007 Facility Status: Active, Permit: AWS250007 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Roujine County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: Q111112011 Entry Time. G2:00 PM Exit Time: incident #:
Farm Name: Sutton Family Farm,_LLC Owner Email:
Owner: Woody A Sutton Sr _ Phone: [phone],,,,
Mailing Address: 6265 Wyse Fork Rd Dover NC 285268832
Physical Address: 3391 Dover Fort Barnwell Rd _ _ Dover NC 28526
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: J C Howard Farms
Location of Fans: Latitude: 35' 17'07" Longitude: 77°21'46"
Farm Location: North SR 1262 Craven Co.
Question Areas:
Discharges & stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment © Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Woody A Sutton
Secondary OIC{s):
Operator Certification Number: 17713
On -Site Representativeisj: Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Chase Mackey Phone:
On -site representative Woody Sutton Phone:
Primary inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s);
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250007 owner- Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Inspection Date: D411112011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inspection Summary:
COC and Permit in records
Waste Analysis 1-14-11 1.9
9-30-10 1.2
6-16-10 1.3
Crop yield complete
Calibration complete 5-8-10 w/ 196 GPM
Freeboard and Rainfall complete and correspond with irrigation
`Just planted corn
"Need to send off new waste analysis and update IRR-2's
Soil Test 12-13-10 wl highest lime 1.6 tons }applied lime
Cu and Zn values within range
Sludge Survey extension till 2014
*No underground draintile in sprayfelds
Facility Number : 250007
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250007 Owner . Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Facility Number: 250007
inspection Date: 04/11/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,320 4,400
Total Design Capacity: 4,320
Total SSLW: 583,200
Waste structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard observed Freeboard
agoon 1 03/18/92 19,50 34.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr Facility Number : 250007
Inspection Date: D4111/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges 8� 5tream Impacts
Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? {# yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
Cl
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. 1s storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
U
■
ii
U
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
fi. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
1 D. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
Improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Inspection Date: 04/11/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250007
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/101bs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
Q
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Q
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crap Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Q
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
Cl
■
Q
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
Q
■
Q
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250907 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Inspection Date: 04/11/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 250007
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
Q
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
�]
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ Q
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Q
Weekly Freeboard?
Q
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
Q
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
Q
■ Q Q
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
Q
■ ❑ Q
box{es} below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Q
Nan -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance.
28. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS250007 Owner • Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Inspection Date: 04/1112011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 250007
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
in
Page: 7

it
C
Division of Water quality
Cj Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250007 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250007 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Graven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 0210212010 Entry Time:05:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Sutton Family Farm, LLC Owner Email:
Owner: Woody A Sutton Sr Phone:252&23-6956
Mailing Address: 6265 Wyse For Rd Dover NC 285268832
Physical Address: 3391 Dover Fort Barnwell Rd Dover NC 28526
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: J C Howard Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 3, ' 17'07" Longitude: 1'4 "
Farm Location: North SR 1262 Craven Co.
Question Areas:
© Discharges & Stream Impacts jj Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents IN Other Issues
Certified Operator: Woody A Sutton Operator Certification Number: 17713
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Chase Mackey Phone:
On -site representative Chase Mackey Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Facility Number: 25DO07
Inspection Date: 0210212010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
lnspection Summary:
New COG and Permit in Records
Waste Analysis 10-25-09 1.4
6-30-09 1-5
2-19-09 2.3
Soil Test 4-1-09 with highest lime .6 tons
Cu and Zn values within range
Crop yield complete
Freeboard and Rainfall complete and correspond with irrigation
calibration due 2010
Sludge extension till 2014
*Wheat stand poor - may not make wheat crop} check next time
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250007 Owner -Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 0210212010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspe0on Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard ❑bserved Freeboard
agoon 1
03/18/92
19.50
21.00
Page: 3

Permit: AINS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr Facility Number. 250007
Inspection Date: 02/02/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
0
■
0
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
fi. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9- Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Inspection Date: 02/02/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 250007
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/1O lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Lynchburg
Sail Type 2
Goldsboro
Soil Type 3
Noffolk
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the reoeiving crap and/or land application site need improvement?
■ ❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20 Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page. 5

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Facility Number. 250007
Inspection Date: 02/02/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
Cl
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
n
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES onlY)? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
Cl
D
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26 Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
n
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30 At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS250007 owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 02/02/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional ❑WQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ n
n■n❑
Page:?

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250007 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250007 _ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Roul ne County: Craven , Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 02/09/2009 Entry Time:09:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Sutton Family Farm, LLC Owner Email:
Owner: W ,ndy A Sutton Sr Phone: 252 ,523-p474
Mailing Address: 6273 Wyse Fork Rd Dover NC 285268832
Physical Address: 3391 Dover Fort Barnwell Rd Dover NC 28526
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: J C Howard Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 17'07" Longitude: 77°21'46"
Farm Location: North SR 1262 Craven Co
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Woody A Sutton Operator Certification Number: 17713
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Chase Mackey Phone:
On -site representative Woody Sutton Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary lnspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility; Woody A Sutton Sr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 02/09/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CDC and Permit 2009
Waste Analysis 9-2-08 1.4
5-8-08 1.5
1-30-08 1.5
'Just sent off new waste sample
Sail test 3-27-08 with highest lime 1.3 tons
Cu and Zn values within range
Just sent off 2009 soil test
Calibration complete 5-1-08 with 157 & 197 GPM } Next one due 2010
Rainfall and Freeboard complete and correspond with irrigation
Crap yield complete
Sludge Survey needs to be completed by end of 2009
Update Waste Utilization Plan
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 0210912D09 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 4.320 51
Total Design Capacity: 4,320
Total SSLW: 583,200
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 03/18/92 19.50 27.D0
Page: 3

Permit: AW5250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr Facility Number : 250007
Inspection Date: 02/OW009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc-)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals [Cu, Zn, etc]?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Inspection Date: 02/09/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 250007
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Cam (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Lynchburg
Soil Type 2
Goldsboro
Soil Type 3
Norfolk
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAVv'MP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
15. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr Facility Number : 250007
Inspection Date: 02/09/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Ywm
Nn
NA
NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ 0
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility; Woody A Sutton Sr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 02/09/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page. 7

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250007 Facility Status: Permit: AWS250007 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven _ _ . Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 01/28/2005 _ Entry Time:11'00 AMAM _ Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Sutton Family Farm, LLC Owner Email:
Owner: Woody A Sutton Sr Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6273 M5Q Fork Rd _ Dover NC 28526
Physical Address: 3391 Dover Fort Barnwell Rd Dover NC 2526
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: J C Howard Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'1715" Longitude: 77'21' '
Farm Location: North SR 1262 Craven Co.
Question Areas:
Discharges & stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment ji Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Woody A Sutton Operator Certification Number: 17713
Secondary OIC(s):
on -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Chase Mackey Phone:
On -site representative Woody Sutton Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan N Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility. Woody A Sutton Sr Facility Number : 250007
Inspection Date: 01/28/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
'Need copy of new COC and State Permit in records
Waste Analysis 11-9-07 1.6
6-26-07 2.0
3-30-07 2.0
`Sent off new waste analysis and waiting for return
No soil test in records for 2007 } sail test under Nobles Farm Inc. - applied lime before wheat planted
Calibrations due 2008
Sludge survey 12-28-07 Thick-2.0'
LTZ-6.1' ) APPLIED FOR EXTENSION
Crop yield complete
Irrigation complete and correspond with freeboard
Freeboard and rainfall complete
'Send State Permit requirements
Page: 2

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Inspection Date: 01/28/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 250007
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
$wine
W Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,320 4.600
Total Design Capacity: 4,320
Total SSLW; 583,200
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1
03/18/92
19.50
33,00
Page 3

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Facility Number:
250007
Inspection Date: 01/2812008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
■
n
❑i
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other
than from a n
■
n
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
Cl
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr
Inspection Date: 01/28/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 250007
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 2
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Lynchburg fine sandy
loam
Soil Type 2
Goldsboro
Soil Type 3
Norfolk
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ 0 ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ n
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? n ■ ❑ n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ n n
1$. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page 5

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Sr Facility Number : 25.0007
Inspection Date: 01/28/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
woo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
■
n
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
n
■
❑
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ n ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air DOOM
Quality representative immediately.
Page. 6

Permit: AWS250007 Owner - Facility; Woody A Sutton Sr Facility Number : 250007
Inspection pate: 01/28/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reasan for Visit: Routine
Mhor Icahn& Yes No NA NE
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 0 ■ E3 0
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? [1 ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑■nn
Pag& 7

1
t
Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number. 250007 — Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA225007 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Craven Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 0310112OQ7 Entry Time:12:00 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: tt n Family Farm LLC Owner Email:
Owner: Woody A Sutton Jr Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 65 Wyse Fork Rd Dover NC 28526
Physical Address: 3391 Dover Fort Barnwell Rd Dover NC 26526
Facility Status: n Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°17'15" Longitude: 77°21'55"
Farm Location: North SR 1262 Craven Co
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment ji Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Woody A Sutton Operator Certification Number: 17713
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Woody Sutton Phone:
24 hour contact name Jimmy Pollock Phone: [phone] ext 24
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: NCA225007 Owner - Facility: Woody A Sutton Jr
Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 03/01/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CCC and Permit 2007 } going with the state permit
WUP 1-15-03
Waste Analysis 1-9-07 1.2
10-19-06 .67
8-10-06 .99
Soil test 11-30-06 with highest lime 1.3 tons) need to apply lime
Cu and In values within range
Calibrations complete 10-23-06 158 GPM and 196 GPM ) complete everyother year
Annual certification submitted to Raleigh
Crop yield complete
Irrigation records complete
Sludge survey extension until 2007
'going to put rainbreaker equipment on pump
"make an effort to establish vegetation on barespots of lagoon
Page: 2

Permit: NCA225007 Owner- Facility: Woody A Sutton Jr
Facility Number : 250007
Inspection Date: 03/0112007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,320 4,580
Total Design Capacity: 4,320
Total SSLW: 583,200
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1
03/18/92
19.50
37.00
Page: 3

0
Permit: NCA225007 Owner • Facility: Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number : 250007
Inspection Date: 03/01/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Qischar ies & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ■ D
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field D
Other D
a. Was conveyance man-made? D ■ D D
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ D D
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
D
■
D
D
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
D
■
D
D
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
D
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
D
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
D
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
0
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management D
■
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
❑
D
D
B. ❑o any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
D
■
❑
❑
dry stacks andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
D
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
00
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? D
Hydraulic Overload? D
Frozen Ground? D
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? D
Page: 4

Permit: NCA225007 Owner - Facility; Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 03/01/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN n 10%/10 lbs.? rl
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
it
Evidence of wind drift?
rl
Application outside of application area?
fl
Crop Type 1
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Lynchburg
Soil Type 2
Goldsboro
Soil Type 3
Norfolk
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n ■ n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
n ■ n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n ■ n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n ■ n
n
18_ Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n ■ n
n
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NI_
19. Did the facility fait to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n ■ n
n
24. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n ■ n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Page: 5

Permit: NCA225007 Owner- Facility: Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number; 250007
Inspection Hate: 03/01/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps? n
Other? n
21- Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after a 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form [NPDES only]?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
■
❑
n
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25- Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27- Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
■
n
n
Other Issues Yes No NA N
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? n ■
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ n ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: NCA225007 Owner- Facility: WoodyA Sutton Jr
Inspection Date: 03/01/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss rev iewli n s p e cti on with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 250007
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 7

0
U
0 Division of Water quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 250007 Facility Status: Active Permit NCA225007 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: CompliariceAnspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: CrpyenRegion: Washington
Date of Visit: 02/14/2006 Entry Time:11:30 AM Exit Time: 12:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Nobles Farm Owner Email:
Owner. Nobles Farms Inc Phone:[phone]
Mailing Address: 3356 Dover -Ft Barnwell Rd Dover NC 26526
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°17'15" Longitude: 77°21'55"
Farm Location: North SR 1262 Craven Co.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment jj Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Johnny Byrd Nobles Operator Certification Number: 25600
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Johnny Nobles Phone:
24 hour contact name Johnny Nobles Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: NCA225007 Owner - Faclilty: Nobles Farms Inc
Facility Number. 250007
Inspection Date: 02114l2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
WUP 1-15-03
Waste analysis 12-5-05 1.5
9-30-05 1.6
8-3-05 1.6
Soil test 1-23-06 with highest lime 0 tons
Cu and Zn values within range
PLAT complete 5-25-04, no fields received high or very high
Sludge survey not needed until 2007
Need to get a copy of COC and Permit for records
Calibrations completed 12-8-05
Rainfall and Freeboard complete
IRR-1 and IRR-2 forms complete - given copy of new IRR-2 farm
Make sure to address the bare spots on lagoon walls
Page: 2

Permit: NCA225007 Owner- FacIIlty: Nobles Farms Inc
Inspection Date: 02114/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Facility Number: 250007
Reason for Visit: Routine
Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard observed Freeboard
agoon 1 29.00
Pag e: 3

Permit: NCA225007 owner - Facility: Nobles Farms Inc Facility Number : 250007
Inspection Date: 0211412006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream_Imp cts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field !71
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? n ■ n n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) (3■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
❑
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed {I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6, Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11, is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA225007 Owner- Facility: Nobles Farms Inc
Facility Number. 250007
Inspection Oats: 02114/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
D
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Lynchburg
Soil Type 2
Goldsboro
Soil Type 3
Norfolk
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ 0
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
...............
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
■ ❑ n
❑
20. hoes the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
in
Page: 5

Permit: NCA225007 Owner - Facility: Nobles Farms Inc Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 02/14/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? fl ■ D ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Waste Application? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Transfers? ❑
Rainfall? ❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly? rl
Waste Analysis? ❑
Annual soil analysis? ❑
Crop yields? ❑
Stocking?
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 ■ ❑ n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
[I
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
❑
❑
■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: NCA225007 owner - Faclllty: Nobles Farms Inc
Inspection Date: 02J14/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 250007
Reason far Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
Page: 7

It
I
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250007 _ Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA225007 _ _ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ _ _ _ County: Craven Region: Washinaton
Date of Visit: 08/02/2005 Entry Time:09:3AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Nobles Farm _ _ _ Owner Email:
Owner: ambles Farms Inc _ Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3355 Dover -Ft Barnwell Rd Dover NC 2852Q
Physical Address:
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: J C Howard Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°17'15" Longitude. 77°21'55"
Farm Location: North SR 1262 Craven Co
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents ® Other Issues
Certified Operator: Johnny Byrd Nobles Operator Certification Number: 25600
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Johnny Nobles Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Elate:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: Ibs N per 1000 gal
6-1-05 = 2.8
4A-05 = 2.2
2-10-05 = 2.4
Soil test current'05
Page: 1

Permit; NCA225007 Owner - Facility: Nobles Farms Inc Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 08/02/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current population
Swine
Swine - Feeder t4 Finish 4,320 4,310
Total Design Capacity: 4,320
Total SSLW: 583,200
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon 1 28.00
Page: 2

n
0
Permit: NCA225007 Owner - Facility: Nobles Farms Inc
Facility Number. 250007
Inspection Date: 08/02/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA _NL
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑
Yes
M ❑
Na NA
❑
NE
Waste Collection_ Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe erosion,
❑
❑
❑
seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management or
13
❑
❑
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks
❑
■ ❑
❑
and lor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
❑
❑
improvement?
Yes
No NA
NF
Waste Apolicatim
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
Cl
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Page: 3

Permit: NCA225007 Owner - Facility: Nobles Farms Inc Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 08/02/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste AjpJjr-ption Yes No NA- NF
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Sail Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)?
❑
0 ❑
❑
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
❑
N ❑
❑
16, aid the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
0 ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
Yes
0 ❑
No NA
❑
NE
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fall to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute Inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall7
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
Stacking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
N ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ N
❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑ N
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
Pag e: 4

Permit: NCA225007 Owner - Facility: Nobles Farms Inc
Inspection Date: 08/02/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 250007
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other fssties
2B. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-oompliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlar document and report those mortality
rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality
representative immediately-
3 1, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 5

Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection ❑ Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 6 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up Q Emergency Notification D Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 25 Date of Visit: 8-242004 Time: 1Z35
Q Not ❑ erational a Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: Niables.F.Ar................................................................................................... County: Cra y'm............................................W.RRQ........
Owner Name: ................................................... tXt}bW-FAX.MS,11C................................. Phone No: (S �.S ' : 44�........................................................
Mailing Address: 5.>RaY�r:)� X1tk�ttilt.tiR�d................................................... Do 28.516 .............
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: johimyAoblu........................................................................... integrator: CarolllqAA.HawA rd.tr:arm............................
Certified Operator:J.QkliJlny.,,yrd....................... N0195............................................... Operator Certification Number: 25600 ................ -.........
...
Location of Farm:
Farm Location: North SR 1262 Craven Co.
R Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 'F 17 4 F 15 11 Longitude 77 ' 21 55
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry Capacity
population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
JE1 Layer
ICI Dairy
N Feeder to Finish
4324
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
4,320
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
583,200
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 F Subsurface Drains Present Spray Field Area
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part: of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:..................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 35"
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 25-7 Date of Inspection 1 8-24-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Aprilication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ®N❑
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atior below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ®No
Air Quality representative immediately.
COments. refer,td ques#ion #):'Explain any YE5 answers andlo'i any recommeddations,or,any- other comments.
Use drawings Hof facility to better explain situations. (use additional,pages as -necessary): (] Field Copy El Final Notes
Records available 3
Waste Analysis:
7-29-04 = 2.20 lbs
6-1-04 = 2.50 lbs
3-26-04 = 2.30 lbs
2-3-04 = 2.201bs
12-4-03 = 1.90 lbs
I0-6-03 = 1.54 lbs
8-6-03 = 1.40 lbs
it analysis - Samples pulled every year behind soybeans. Have soil analysis for every year to date.
igation records are complete and balanced out.
!eboard, rainfall, mortality and crop yields are kept.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B. HWison -.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
12112103 v Continued

Facility Number 25-7_ Date of Inspection S-Z4-2004
,Required
Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N N❑
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Cl Yes
N No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
N Yes
❑ No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
N No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
N No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crap Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Additional Comments and/or Drawings: _
Sludge survey and irrigation calibration completed "
Crops in good shape.
Vegetation on dike wall is well established.
If you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or us @ 252-946-6481.
12112103

Facility Number 2�
Farm Name Nobles Farm
07 Date: 11i1U4 Time: 1100 I Time On Farm: 90 WaRO
County Craven
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 3355 Dover -Ft. Barnwell Road
Dover NC
Onsite
Representative Johnny Nobles Integrator Carolina -Howard
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
Operation Review
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
is Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Q Routine
Q Response to DWQIDENR referral
Q Response to DSWCISWCD referral
Q Response to complaintflocal referral
Q Requested by producer/integrator
Q Follow-up
Q Emergency
Q Other...
Design Current Design Current
Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
4320
4320
Ca aci Po ulation
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
28526
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 1 30
CROP TYPES Com Soybeans Wheat
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES Ly GoA NoA
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
Facility Number 25 - 07 Date: 2/17104 1
PARAMETER
171 R Wa�tP *nill laavinn site
0 No assistance provided/requested
38 _....._..---•----.__ .. 03/10/03 .

r...._�...., _.__
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
I hL;HNIGAL A55151 ANI:t Neeaea
F'royideD
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
El
10.
Level in structural freeboard
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
❑ 11.
Level in storm storage
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
❑ 12.
Waste structure integrity compromised
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
❑
❑
El 13.
Waste structure needs maintenance
29. Missing Components [list in comments]
❑
❑
❑ 14.
Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
30. 2H.0200
❑
❑
❑ 15.
Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
re -certification
❑ 15.
Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans. of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18.
Latelmissing waste analysis
33. Organixelcomputerixation of records
❑
❑
❑ 19.
Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
®
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21.
Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
® 22.
Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24.
Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker checklcalibration
❑
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
] Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
] Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation designlinstallation
❑
❑
] other...
system
Date:
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre determination
❑
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluation/recommendations
❑
❑
2.
49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
63. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
5.
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6.
58. Crop/forage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil andlor waste sampling education
❑
❑
Facility Number 25 - 07 Date: 2117104
COMMENTS:
39 03/10/03

rrigation reel calibrated 10115/03.
4. Need to secure sludge survey.
:omplete animal certification by March 1.
Haste analysis dated 213104 nitrogen is 2.2 lbs
1214/03 nitrogen is 1.9 lbs
10/6103 nitrogen is 1.6 lbs
816103 nitrogen is 1.4 lbs
Soil test dated 9122/03 waste applied to samples 004, 04A and 003. Cu, Zn and PH within guidelines. Waiting for lab
zults for samples 006, 06A, 007, 008 lime applied on 10/0203
RR1 are complete.
2. IRR2 includes cover crop not be harvested before corn crop. Cover crop is not included in waste plan. Contacted Carl
unn, ❑SWC, and he will fax amendment to producer to include cover crop with windows and pan rates. Producer planning
disk cover crop with no more than 30 lbs n applied per acre. Pull #10 and pull # 13 field nitrogen applied to cover crop is
,eater than 30 lbs/acre and these two pulls will have to be harvested. Pull 10 = 42 lbs n per acre and pull 13 = 36.25 lbs n
ar acre. Show on crop yield record.
RR2 records for 2003 soybean crop complete and balanced.
Stocking and yield records were available for review.
.agoon freeboard level is recorded weekly with rainfall events. Drops in lagoon are consistent with irrigation events.
deceiving crops in good condition. Farm is well maintained.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST IMartin MCLawhorn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 120104 Entered By: IMartin McLawhorn
40 03/10/03

❑0F W a rE'9�G Mici-ael F. Easley
Governor
tt 7 r Wr rrarn G. Ross Jr., Secretary
'^1 Depadrnent of Environment and Natural Resources
❑ 'C
Gregory J. Thorpe. Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
To: Producer
From: Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2042
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facility
by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it with ail other
documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the
farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 21-0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the
General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste
level for waste for lagoonststorage ponds must not exceed the level dud provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hoes storm
event plus an additional foot of structta-al freeboard.
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical) and at least
within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen,
Phosphors, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
q) The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance; repair, wastelsoil analysis and land irrigation records.
These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no rase shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receivingcrgp or result in runoff during any given application.
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet can be
another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
cp It is suited not a rgggkqpertt, to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Divisions of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact meat 252-946-6481, ext.
321 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: . WaI O
DBC Files
943 Washington Square Malt Washington, NC 27889 252-946-WI (telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Facility Number Date of Visit: F 9/1712002 Time: 11:4i} am
p Not Operationalp Velow Tbireshold
■ Permitted E Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Nobles Farm County: Crimen............:.......
Farm Name: ............................ ........
Owner Name: Nobles Farms, Inc. Phone No: [phone]
Mailing Address: 33-'iS..Dnxer.-F.LBar Lwp.1.Road.....-----•.................................................... Dover.NC... ............................................................ 28526 ..............
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Nn.one.onsit L.................................. ................... -....................... Integrator: Cax-.oIJnz.&.Ua.w.axA.FArzm ............................
Certified Operator:,Iulumy-Byrd...................... Nobles ............................................... Operator Certification Number: 255114..........................
...
Location of Farm:
Farm Location: North NR 1262 Craven Co.
® Swine ❑ Poultry p Cattle p Horse
design. _ Ca
• Swine' C� aci -Po-
Latitude ©• ©4 ©" Longitude ©■ ©° ©u
'Desigw.' Current
- -• . ....... .
Fault Cable -
u
n :; ; :ry` ;TCapacty Pdpulatnn�;= • ._ -:. = - Cap$cty:a..,Pup latiop
p Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
p Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
13 Gilts
p Boars
IC
er
`` Total Desi y Capael 4,324
„aa` =:,;r Total;$SI1Wx'= 583 UO
Y
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: 13 Lagoon p Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge'
Waste Collection & Treatment
4:-Is storage capacity (freeboard -plus storm-storage),less than adequate?—p Spillway--- .--- - .--------
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes p No
p Yes N No
' ❑ Yes N No
-p -Yes -a No
Structure b
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ...............:.39..............

+ 1 Fact um er: 25-7
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6, Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Com, Soybeans, Wheat
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes p No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes U No
El Yes U No
Cl Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Yes ® No
p No violations or deficiencies were noted uring this visit You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments:(rem _toy uestvon: : ; Ex ..)�a[n an: _ ..:E ;'answers'andlor":.'an :recommendations or''any ot. er: comments:4
_ :.. st-
is� draw�ngsaf:facity.�tobetter explain'situatsons:.`(nse'a'liditiviaal;pages.as necessary):] -
Field Copy p Final Notes k_'
n m;;e _' t :❑ :
- _
Freeboard level adequate. * Recently loaded out animals.
Waste analysis 8/5/02 - 2.3 ibs/1000 gals.; 2.9 ibs/1000 gals.
Soil analysis 1/2002; Reminder to sample for 2002.
Freeboard levels adequate for past year/all records complete.
Irrigation records complete with nitrogen balance.
r. Nobles planning to extend irrigation to land across the road. Amend WUP once irrigation pulls have been
tdentiiied for each -held......-•--- ___ - -_ ..... - - - .. ......... .. ... _..... :... -:..._ -
i!
M
W
Reviewer/inspector Name Da B. Cullom :'.: -'^, ."° :":entered:by Ann Tyndall'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date: �C) 0

05103101
Continued
Facility Number: z5_7�
Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 0 Yes p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
p Yes p No

of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review a Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Q Routine D Complaint Q Follow up Q Emergency Notification 4 other ❑ Denied Access
Facilitv Number 25 7 Date of Visit; 5111ZDQ2 Time: t loU
Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ............
Farm Name: 1!Iabl .Fa�taoa.......... Count : x a�:ea..__....................................... R(aS4........
•-------------
Owner Name: ----- •----• - ................................ Nobles.F.arms..1»........................ ....... Phone No: (.=.523-36.4.b ...... ........ ..... -................................
Mailing Address: 3355.Duxer-X.MAmwell.Raad..--•----•----------.._............................. RoyiUM.................................................. _........ _ 2852fz.... _......
Facility- Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative- Joh=.NOWT.Prealke-Her rinr..................................... Integrator: ------............................
Certified Operator:,tpbuotilJC.ftird..... _................ Nab n................----_................-------- Operator Certification Number: 250.0.... _......................
I.,oration of Farm:
Farm Location: North SR 1262 Craven Co. +
1'W
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ` l7 15 u Longitude 77 • 21 55 44
Deign . Current Design . Current . Design Current
Swine Capacitv Population Pouttr► Capacity- PopulationCattle Catiacity Pn elation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
4320
0
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
© Gifts
❑ bars
❑ Layer ❑ Dair
❑ Non -Layer n-Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity . 4,320
. Total SsL* 583,24a
Number of Lagoons 1 ®SuI►surface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area jig Spray Field Area
.Holding Ponds I So[id Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar,Fes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ® No
Dischara►: originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is obser-md_ what is the esiiinated tloi"' in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon ,%•stem? (If yes, notify- DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State oth►:r than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 0 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure i Structure 2 Sinicture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Stnicture G
Identifier: .................................... .................................... ...................
Freeboard (inches): _... ...... .. N......................4...4...

05103101
Facility Number. 25-7
Date of inspection 1 5/1/2002
Continued
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie1 trees, severe erosion,
scepagc. etc.)
b. Arc there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenanu:limprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9_ Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ I-Ndraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
e) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
IT Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (icl irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Oe/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yeti ® No
❑ Yes N Nn
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Corti (refer.to grWstava # : v-Esp ...: any;;YE1=stiswerattdlor;any recaranmeri iaiions'or, any. other commei;ts �-� _ ; w€: E:_ :-•: � :;..:
Use drawings of id eaplatnmsiteta#Innstuse. additional p�ges'as: necessary):!Field C Final Notes -
_.
*Waste plan has been amended to include windows to be extended on soybeans to Sept 15. Signed by tech spec and dated 1/30/02 AL
_
*Facility will restock on 5/15/02.
*Lagoon level is recorded weekly.
*Waste analysis dated 3/28/02 nitrogen is 2.9 Ibs11000 gallons
215/02 nitrogen is 2.5 ibsl1000 gallons
1217101 nitrogen is 3.9 ibs11000 gallons
*Soil test dated 1/10102 sample 008 requires less than one ton lime per acre. Remember to take soil test for 2002 and follow lime
requirements. Cu and Zn within guidelines. �.
ReviewerlInspector Name Martin Mcll:a►fhorn,--_-.
QoaiowPN�rw�eu�ni�� C�..,.•J t��.n• r1A�P•

05103101 Condhaed
Facility Number: 25-7 ©ate of Inspection s/112002
Odor Issues
26. lloes the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
onimcrcial fertilizer that was applied to wheat crop has been deducted from IRR2 PAN balances.
Records are complete and balanced.
Veg on dike walls well established.
Varm is well maintained.
N
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No

(2) the farm is complying with nquiremems ofthe State Riles 15 NCAC 2110217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
W ste Management. Pin; (3) the farm Oplretion`s waste management system is being operated properly Under the direction of a
Certified Operator; (4) the requ itil records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, andlor nano$
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented
.x The ma>pffium wasth level in Tagooa"Jstaragepnnds1 not exd fbadt sCiSed m the CAWMP. At a nnmimtmi
- ma mvm waste le► 6 waste for lagoaosJstoiage Pcndsmust not exceed the ]e vel bunt provides ode e�ateystaiags to
contain 25 year, 24 hour stator event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
(p An analysis ofthe lurid animal waste fi m the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of appiication as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) ofthe date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
m Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis
q) The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wastelsoil analysis and land irrigation
records These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minim um of three years
(p Land application rates shalt be in aaaordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land Mplication rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PANT rate for the receiving crop or result in nmoff d_urmg any given application.
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages- Tine outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabiiintion structure, or other suitable outlets.
cp It is estai not a uirem to keep crop yield infounation far fixture use to update your waste.managemew lan. -
2.= Y will eedthreE �' ,.�. P �;�.�:..
`�+y�`��•� .si�"'�?tiv��'i}�.-t����Y� g .a�J�. �r .�"t':,�RY.���.. ,F_ ,�� �j'.�oJh:'-+�� -
- n Ibaink3+aii `f yiiuir.aM M.213d Cooperation tinting the insparicun Iiyau Inave any gbestic cs; please bo ni ict me art 252 94&
Cc: ,W
DBC Files
943 Washington Square Matt W won, NC 27889 252-S46-6481 (Telephone) 252-94fr9215 (Faoc)

it .-._._....m.�:...._.. ..._ =... ....a.. :st r' �'+,.,,�« � ... .3. _�. �'-emu•., �:a �,:• i.�5r.��'..�, i ,-�rr�. �sxv�::3�:�h^'x�'�'d+�x:���,.; ��
Type of Ytsit �0 Compliance lrtspe�na O man Review, Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visft'� ® Routine `¢ Complaint a Follow up Q Emergency NotTicatioh 0 Other ' _ ❑ Denied Access
Date ot• Viot7 7 7!i~200i Time,' 2:4t] � Printed on: MU2001
Facitit_r- Number ?$ fl7
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Cer#iFied 0 Conditionalh Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: _.... .
Farm Name: Nahks Ea. _ _ - _, County; S;�aYr� R'8��? ......
Owner Name: h[nhka.Exxmu1 is .._.__ Phone No:
Mailing Address: 3 _4L1'tYist7,1~r_FRoad _ __ 28526...._.......
Facilit►• Contact_ Tittle: Phone No: .»__...____ ..._ ..�... .
Ondte Representative: �llr iVabl<es.... _. _ �_ _._ _. Integrator: NxubjQff.Esrjt7ta,J[Ur._._..._._...........................
CertiFed Operator. ,1<uJ�,px_ _ Iy _. Operator Certification Number . _ , ...�.. ,..,...
Location of Farm:
Farm Location: North SR 1262 Craven Co. •
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 a ]7 I5 I onCitude 77 ' 21 55
......I .............. ................ ..........----
' g.
ii Current ` Design ......Drurret�t.
.....
Srvlde ''C : achy' Pti IIlation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 4320 2%0
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Fan to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
...... - --- .....
a'> j fir' �p 1 ® Suhsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ®Spray Field Area
um of
;5
oI iidyM; s` xst t 'N q* Po s 1 Solid 'I No li uid W e Mama eme Syst n em
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at; ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the convevance ruin -made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes_ notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is obsen-ed_ what is the estimated flow in galimin?
d- Doe& discharge b�?ass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify D W Q)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were tbere an adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? E] Spillwav
Structtue 1 Structure 2 Stnrcame 3 Structure 4 Strueiure 5
Identifier:
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
Sini ture 6
Freebow-d ruches):

Facility Number: 25-07 Date of Inspection 7-16-2001 Printed on. 7I31I2001
5- Are 1here any immediate threats to the bxtep*of any of the Amct ues observed? Cwl trees, severe erasion,
seepam etc-)
_ structures on -site which am not pro*ly addressed an&cr managed a waste mmagemem or
6. Are thettr
x closure plan? many of guru 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,' notify DWQ)
7- Do any of the structures noad
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste s>ruc'tuivs require mamtenanae/mzprovement?
4. Do any strictures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and miirnum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that tread maintenaoceiuprovemcut? -
11. is there evidence of over application? '❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
I3. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated iu the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the faciW fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(le/ WUP, checklists. design_ maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie1 irrigation freeboard.. waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with am, applicable setback criteria in cifect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(icl discharge, freeboard problems. over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site represenlative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes ® No
El Yes ❑No
❑ Yes ['j No
❑ Yes ❑ No
El Yes EK, No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes Z No
Yes Z. No
Ej Yes Z, No
I I Yes Z� No
El Yes :9 No
FO Yes 9 No
❑ Yes JR- No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncampliance of the Certified AWW? ❑ Yes ® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted durWZ this «sit You will receive no further correspondenee about thss visit.
Vaste analysis 6AMI,11 ibs.11000 gals., 414101, 3.1 lbs.11000 gal&
oil analysis 1112000, 222101.
,ll irrigation records complete with a nitrogen balance.
to overapplication noted, commercial fertilizer use noted in records.
acility well maintained.
.::::::......:
e - 1
►-tewerllns or N e R am
1� Datrh
Reviewer/Inspector
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
:,.: -
ir..�� Date:

0510 1VI
Fat i ty Nnmber_ 25--W Date of Inspection 7-]C�2Uflf
C mdnued "
Printed on: W3112001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the =&wncat building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or stowage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there airy dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 honrs?
28. Is there any cvidence of wind drift dmring land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, andlor public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not Iocated near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were am major mamftanoc problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a sulnumged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
AddhionalComments: AxWor. s:��;.:F�:m:,..-:=

[Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection d Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation i
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint Q Follow up 0 Emergency Notification ()Other ❑ Denied Access
§.17ate (ifXlsit: 212Dr20U1 Time: 13:3D Printed ow 713/2001
Facility Number 25 7
Q Not ❑ crational Q Belo ►- Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Lavt Operated or :ll>oi e. Threshold: -
Farm Name: Nob es.Fam. ..................... .. Count►: ........ Gra :ti0...........
- D
fan ner Name. d:albul;i j................ -................. Nabk&................. ...................... .................. Phony No.•nl-r51136.4k .............. ..............
-Mailing Address: ��55.Dat'.er.-Ftti Darrt��>t.Road.................................. ......... Daxer..NiC................... ...... ............. Zki52f .............
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative: JoltBmy.Nloblies.......................... lntc.grat.or• N.euhof F;trM,%.tlac..........................
Certified Operator:.FuhM ................................... i!i.UWs............... ................................ Operator Certification Number: .2Sb0.Q.............................
Location of Farm:
Farm Location: North SR 1262 Craven Co.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3S 17 15 .. b)ngitude 77 ` 21 c 55 '•
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
S►I,ine Capacity Population
Poultr,v
Ca acity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Layer
JE1 Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
4320
800
JE1
1❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finigh
Total Design Capacity
4,320
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
583,204
❑ 13oars
Number of Lagoons 1 ®Suhsurface Drair 110 Lagiwn Area J2 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps . ❑ No Liquid Waste Management Ss stem
Diseharu-o & Stream Impact;
1- I.s any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes ® No
i3is: har�4 cariginatul at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray l- ield ❑ 0ther
a. If discharge is obscn-e& •%-as the coin-ci,ancc Juan -made" ❑ Yes ❑ No
h- It di,;cIiarLe 1 obrcn-ed, did 11 flash Water o law `;talc•? (1f-)-es- notit�• f )WQ) 0 Yeti ❑ No
c. Ifdischwroe is observed, what Is the estim lied tlo%i in i'allntin?
d- Yes ❑ No
2- Is there evidence of past discharge frorn any part of the operation? ❑ Yes X No
3. Were there any advurs-c impact.: or Irotential adve.Ne impacts to the WaIeN of the State other than from a discharge'! ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus stonn storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spilhi ay ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Stiucittre 2 Sinlctury Structure 4 5iruciRre 3 Slructurc: 6
Idcutit io.. .......... 12runtajW............................. ............ ....................... .... ................ -...... ........ ........... ......................... ................ ....................
i rceboard (inche°s):...............3.4...............

05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 25-7 Date of Inspection Printed on: 7/3/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of anv of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage. etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste tanagement or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures necd maintenance/improvemc-nt? ❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management s Istem other than waste structures require maintenancelirnprovement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required matirnunr and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance:limprovement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence ofover application? ❑ E.xcessive Ponding []PAN ❑ l lydraulic (Xe-rload ❑ Yes N No
12. Cmp type Corn, Soybeans. Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
j] Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a gettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yeti
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop uccd improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Recnrds & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management flan readily available"
(icl WUP, checklists, design, maps_ etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation. freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20.
Is facility not in compliance: with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency- situations as required by General Permit?
(le/ discharge, freeboard problems. over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discus~ reviewlinspection with on -site rvprescntative`?
❑ Yes
N No
24.
Does facility require a folloxi-up visit by sarne agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Were any additional problem, noted ►khich cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
I No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this Visit.
4
Comments (refer.to.yuestion.#): Explain:adt YES. answers and/or; anv recommendations or anyother cammeirts . =
Use druw-ings of fucillty to. better explain situations: (use addHiQtnal.pages as rie�ssan):., ❑ veld Copy ❑ Fina1 Notes
P. r-
* Discussed IRR21wastc analysis scheduling with Nir. Nobles.
* Lagoon level being recorded wLekly as required by Permit.
* Waste analysis dated 2111)1. Nitrogen is 2.9 lbs11000 gallons. On 1014100 nitrogen was 1.8 lbs/1000 gallons
* Soil test dated 1112100. Limc not required. Soil test 2001 have been taken - no results-
* No irrigation since DWQ inspection dated 1 1/29/00.
* 1Rf?2 for wheat is complete and balanced.
* Mr. Nobles rexords commercial fertilvcr application on 1R112 foams.
Revie►ver/Inspector Name Martin McLawhorn entered b►' Della Robbins
Review•erfinsaector Sip -nature: Date:

Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit n Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 25 7 Date of Visit- 11129120L1D Time: t3:30 Printed on: 11/30/2000
❑ Not Operational O Below Threshold
0 Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold : .................
Farm Name: N.0195.1.ar t....................... ................ County: CrAy. 1l.............................................. WARQ........
Owner Name:.[p[M.qy.................................... NQh1M ........................................................ Phone No: 25 :S ft kL.S Q-Q1 4...................................
FacilitvContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: S..l?Q.Y.elr-ktK. �lICAlYell�iRAd ............................. .. ......... Am.[:M............................................................... 215zo .............
Onsite Representative: �1s21tnt�x.!isfAeS................................ lntegrator:N1.W1tQ1Atr[xlS�]�IG, ........................................
Certified Operator:Jojhnoy.................................... No bA CS............................................... Operator Certification Number: .................. -.......... .............
Location of Farm:
Farm Location: North SR 1262 Craven Co. I&':
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 17 15 u Longitude 77 2i 55
Design Current
Swine C:anaeity Panulatien
❑ Wean to Feeder
R Feeder to Finish
4320
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design. .Current-
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle CaEacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 1 4,320
Total SSLW 583,204
Number of Lagoons 1 R Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area IN Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar4les & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes R No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. ]i'discharge is observed, was the conveyance inan-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) El Yes ❑ Na
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system:' (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. 1s there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes R No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes R No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes R No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .....................................................
Freeboard (inches): 45
rmn r•-- r.......i ..- z -_r.

5/00 Continued on hack
Facility Number: 25-7 Dale of inspection 1]129120U0 Printed on: 11/30/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
5. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
N No
_Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
N No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
No violations -or deficiencies,were noted'during, this visit: You will receive no further ;
-correspondence about this •Visit.................................
Reviewer/Inspector Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall

I Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Bate: 51001
Facility Number: 25--7 Date of Inspection 11/29/2000 Printed on: 11/30/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atior below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (Le. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
®No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
®No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
J
SAM

...
� Division of Water Quality
-
. ,:-: - • Q Division at Soil and Water Conservation
Other.. Agency
of Visit • Compliance Inspection 4 Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason far Visit / Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency [Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of VisitTime: �Printed on: 7/21/2000
Facility Number -]
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
❑ Permitted ❑ Certilf�ted © Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ................. .
Farm Name: 1' pli.{'j �u ��,-. Coun€v:..................�"r..4vut ........�.............
Owner Name:.. ..................... b�n,.......V4.}C..
.............. ................ ................... Phone No:........55......-.I...I.........2 -la
Facility- Contact:
Flailing Address:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative:.......... �o�,y...y ��°s.............. ... Integrator:..... Vkn �.�f
Certified Operator:••,,..,..,. 5p�^•,' j! N Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
3 �
❑ 5mine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �` �� ��� Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
'".Swing- Capacity Po ulation Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish 432,0 ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
Gilts
Boars Total SSLW
Lagoons ❑❑ Subsurface Drains Present Iagnnn Area ❑Spray Field Area
= um6er,o!
H� Ponds t Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes )0 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, if discharge is observed, was the conveyancc man-made? El Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State'? (ll' yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the c-stimaled flaw in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bvpass a lagoon systent'? (11' yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes El No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? []Yes jin No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storin storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 0 No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure ; Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier: ............................................................................................................... .....................................................................................
.
Freeboard (inches)-
5100 Continued an back

Facility Number_ 2.5 —
Bate of Inspection — rov Printed on- 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
V No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
V§ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
1?5 No
8. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
[ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
18 No
It. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
[] Yes
Z No
12. Crap type G o• h L"r-A'Is
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
C.No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
O No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
tgNo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
A No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
[9 No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
21 No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®N❑
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
n No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Yes
No
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problets, over application)
❑
[n
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
0 No
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
F1 No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ YesLCI
No
�'Vo viola.iQris:ar defeiearies were noted. d&itig #his:visit:- You will-reeeiye Ad further.
urther :
,curies ori�ence. a aou this i�isit... . .............. . . ... .. ... .... .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments..-; "= <
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
CC"' t
Date: I /-21-0;) 5/00

Facility Number: 2.— Date of luspection f I- j-ao Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or helow ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'? ❑ Yes CA No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon'? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blades), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes MNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes [ANo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5/00

of
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection QQ Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit *Routine o Complaint ❑ Follow asp Q Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 25 7 Date of V icit: F 7713-2000 Time: 935
riot Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated (or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: NubleSTArm.................................................. .......... County: lbra.►en.............................................. W. .aSQ........
DRnerName: JQ.bn y...... ............ ................. Nobla... -.... -...................... ........................ Phone No: 2,515.5.3:M.46......... .................................................
Facility Contact:
Title:
......... Phone No:
Mailing Address: 5 .>aR►'.er:F,)�arntxell.livaci.................................................... D.Q'.k-.er..NC ................................................................ 78526.............
0nsite Representative:,Iwk.Nables................................................................................. Integrator. lYel off.F'at'.tn€s Inc ................
Certified Operator: Juh=.B.............................. Nnbies....... -...................................... Operator Certificatian Number: .1GJ42.............................
Location of Farm:
Farm Location: North SR 1262 Craven Co.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 17 15 '� Longitude 77 • 21 5.r+
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
SR-ine Capacity Population
Poultry'
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Laver
❑ Dain
® Feeder to Finish
4320
4288
JE1 Non -Layer
10 Non_Dain
❑ FwToiv to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ 011ie
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
4,320
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
583,2=
❑ Boars
Number of. Lagoons 1 M uhsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagixin Ana ®Sryra. Field area
Holding Ponds i Solid Traps : ❑ No Liquid Waste Management S►•stem
Dischartp.es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation`? ❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ I.agoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Uthur
a. II -discharge is obsen'ed..a as the rum es a€icc man -mach? ❑ Yes ❑ No
lr. If di�charee is obsen•ed_ did ii reach Wah:r of the Slat.:? (ff vk. s. notify- DWQ) ❑yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed- what is the estimated flow iti yal/inin',
d. Does discharge bypass a lagmm s1 stern? (Irves. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation" ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential advcnc impacts to the Waters of the State other than front a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection ,& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard phis storm storage) loss than adequate? ❑ Spill ay ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Siruciure 2 structure Structure 4 Stnictu€e 3 Structure b
Identifier: pf7xgr7]Cl.......... .......
F rceboard i iuclic 1. ...........

5/00
Facility Number: 25-7 hate of Inspection 7-13-2000
5. Are there: any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
G. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need mainic:nancelimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management syslem other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum Iiquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there anv buffers that need maintenance:/improvement?
i 1. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
Continued on hark
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
[-]Yes N No
12- Crop tApe Corn. Soybeans. Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the; n-y civing crop need improvement?
lb- Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reuuire•d Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available"
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available`?
(icl WUP, checklists. design. maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? 6e/ irrigation. freeboard. waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in c:omplianou with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify- regional DWQ of emergency situations as. required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge. Freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss rev iewlinspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same ageney?
25. Were any' additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further,
correspondence about this visit.
❑Yes El No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Ycs ENO
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
D Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
Comments {refer to gtiesiioni #) ~Explain py.:YES answers an Ivr any reeommendativas or any other. comments
.... .
Use drawings.of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
* Last waste analysis dated 6-7-00 at 2.8 1bs1I000 gal. Previous reports dated 2-2-00at 2.3 and 9-22-99 at 1.9 1bs11000 gal. A.
* Last soils report dated 2-29-00 with no lime needed
* Waste plan dated 4-30-99 with an overall PAN deficit of-2265 lbs
* Operation plants cover in front of corn and then chemically burns down cover to no-til corn- Mr. Nobles keeps IRR2 as one crop cycle
and deducts small grain cover application from corn balance. Only waste applied on cover was in December 1999.
* Mr. Nobles records commercial fertilizer applications in IRR2 as required
TI
Reviewer/Inspector Name

Coun
raven
Owner
o nny INobles
Manager
Address
Location
Certified
Farm Name
Permitted
ironies r arm
Phone Number
3-3646
essee
Region
r
ARO 0 NIRO S WARO o WSRO
FRO 0 RRO 0 WIRG
farm: Location:. ;iV North, . t 2[s� Gray. . . •
... . .
Certified Operator in Charge
Backup Certified Operator
Comments
:'a g4s� Date inactivated or closed
■ Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Sheep p Horses p Goats p None
Design Capacity
p Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
p Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boar Stud
13 Other
Total 4,320 wine
SSLW - 4 ceder to Pinish

Latitude
Longitude
Startdate
I�eededAcres
Technical
Specialist
Integrator
9.0
Andrew W Metts
CAFO
p Request to be removed 13 Removal Confirmation Recieved
Comments &.
Regional DWQ Staff EMEMEM
Registration Date
Certification Date
DEM Reply
Certification #
Conditional Days
Conditional 13 rrigation ys
Requirements 13 Higher Yields
Vegetation
p Acreage
m Other
Basin Name: lNeuse

Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other_ J
I' .I Date of Inspection
1F acility Number 5 Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Registered Certified © Applied for Permit 1BPermitted JONot0perational I Date Last Operated.
Farm Name: ...............A............................................................ ! f , e,—
e fey ��..........................�--................----- County:........................-----...............---.........---................---�--...,
Owner Name: � L` . �/ N�S�)
)facility Contact: ..................�' `" ......... 1:45 .................. Title: ...... ....................
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: ................ti'
1
.. Certified Operator: ................. .......... ................ °�.. .....................
Location of Farm:
PhoneNo:....................................................................................
Phone No:
Integrator:.. .....
...�Ie.^l,a �................
Operator Certification Number;
Latitude ' 4 69 Longitude • 6 44
Current. .:.. -. r Currentsign tlnrren
Capacity Population: . Poultry Capacity Population Cattle. Capaeity...Popolation:.,. .
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ D:,iry
10
Feeder to Finish '4320 Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Other
..
❑ Farrow to Feeder
.... .... -.
❑ Farrow to Finish
Tate Design. Capacity ..
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Tatal SSLW
Nutnher of La D[in5 l..Fioldin Piinds. ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray yield Area
_ ....,.. g... ... g ...
K
<u
Uy
o tqut Waste Management Sys eni • : .
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon systein? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonslholding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge'?
7/25/97
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 1® No
El Yes N No

Facility Number: 25 —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No
Structures (UgoonsJ-1olding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ..........�......Z........................$..................................................................................
...
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
M No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
'lM No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
10 No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers`!
❑ Yes
19 No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
f@ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ....... .�'t........... .. s -. l xn.....t:4!n4 ...........
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
10 No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
10 No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
§9 No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
10 No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
99 No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
[14 No
0• No'violations-or- deficieneie's.rvere noted -during- this;visit.- You;will receive 66further
correspondence Ah"out this:yisit. ;
AA. Tk p^tom
H�, �;lrttl7 51���4 � aRct+ p �', ,.,,1•.,:1- • p { lid S p•.t 1![!u ..,,.,E...r��•z'lilp✓� .�� �5 �C.
7/25/97
m
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewerllnspector Signature: �`�f �--� Date:

Facility Number 25 7 Date of Inspection 91i5198
Time of Inspection 940 24 hr. (hh:nun)
0 Registered N Certified ❑ Applied for Permit M Permitted JCI Not ❑ rational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Nables.Farm1.......................... County: C�rA.Y.al........ ...................................... �'.i�.aRO......--
........................................................................
OwnerName: JQhumy.................................... Noblu ......................................................... Phone No: 521.3fz4(........................................................... .........
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:.............. .................. ......................... ...... Phone No: ... ...... ..........................................
Mailing Address: 3J .�R.Y.�X-kip,. aXm11I .RSA ........................... ........................ D.Qyv:.NC.................................... ...... 21026 .............
Onsite Representative: Jofinny'.,Nobica........................................................................... Integrator: Ngnholff ...................................................................
Certified Operator: j9k Moy.B•............................. Nohles............................................... Operator Certification Number: l63.42.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude F 35 • i7F i5 11, Longitude 77 • 2i 55 °`
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: [I Lagoon [I Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pan of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
G. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
Continued
on back

(Facility Number; 25-7 I slate of Inspection 9115198
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes IN No
Structures (Laeoons Hag Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: 1.1 ............... .
Freeboard (ft): ..... ....... 3......... ............. I...................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
® No
IL Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
[:]Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
t4. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ....... ................. Can ... .......... .......... .............MAI); IS.PYgr..&T.SiR........ .............. ..................... ................................... ...........................................
.
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Does record keeping need improvement'?
❑ Yes
® No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
® No
0: No-violations:or. de- iciencies.were noted during.this'visit.--You- will receive.nolirrther.:.:
c6fresp6hdence; Abbut' this :visit:
* Planning to go to a corn -soybeans -wheat rotation and have irrigation system evaluated to secure operating parameters
* Before plan can be revised, Mr. Nobles will secure irrigation operating parameters (to be done after corn is harvested); so that
rotations can start, have technical specialist (Jimmy Fields) document PANS for crops and fields, include in paperwork and continue
efforts to have plan revised
12. Planning to mow inside and outside dike walls within month after corn is harvested - vegetation moderate but accessible
Reviewer/inspector Name Pat Hooper 252194E-6481
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
Rg
» ..
QAnimal Feedlot Operation Inspection
ection
-
a.
140 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DW2 inspection 0 Follow-up of ❑SAVC review 0 Other
Date ire' Tn•pectirtn
If`af'IIItY Numberz~]
Time of Tttspection 101,50 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time 6n traction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex,1.25 for 1 hr 125 rainy) Spent (in Re►;ievv
19Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
© Not O }eratiunal Date Last Operated:....,,....,
Farm Name: �o n
"�.....N�...........F�r.^........................................
(lwrte.r \ar��e:....... ..-��.'"^�.......... ....�...............................................
Facility Contact: 3, ..........:I..A.........•......... Title: .........
.e )Mailing :address: �359' R ver Ft
Onsite Representative: .......... :.� !'!'fit..........d Gif@.................................
Certified Operator :.. ... ....... .¢�nh:F............... 1a5....................-.........
Location of Farm:
Coutttr•: clwrc 0'
Phone No: S 2 3 -- 3 G `{ 6
.................................................... Phone No:................... ................................
Ra...........170'".�r............�:.�'S,� E�'....................................................
Integrator:......_Nlp.................................
Operator Certification Number: ..................................... _.
A
................................................ •••...... •••...................... •••.............................I ......................... ............................................... .................... . ........
Latitude �' L Longitude ` :4
-- ----- ------ --------------------- -----------
Type of Operation
Swine
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver ❑ Dairy
�3�i `t32J ❑ Nan -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy_ _ I :�:d
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
ElFarrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
[I Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSL W
-Number of Lagoons l Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface ❑rains Present ❑ Lagoon Area Spray Field 2�rea
General
1- Are there any buffers that need maintenancelitnprovement'
7. Is any discharge observed from any Dart of the operation'?
Di,charwe oriair�ated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ 0ther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made''
b. (I d€.char.,e is obsen'ed. did it reach Surface Witter'? (If yes. notify DWQ)
e. Ifditich,�['xL i; observed. what is the estimated flow in gullntin',
d. Doe-, discharge bypas. a lagoon system"' If ve;, notify Dlr Q)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse irnpact� to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
5. Does any pan of the +rite manatwernent system (other than Iagoons/holding ponds) require
�313(}197
mai nten3nceli rrtpro %•e meat''
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Df,No
❑ Yes 15dNo
❑ Yes XNo
e*
Continued on back

Faciiityltiumher: 26;--"�'
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
D�No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
D(No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
OtNo
Structures (Lagoons oons and/or 11 olding Ponds
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
XNo
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 7
Structure G
Lt- 5
10, Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
tKNo
IL Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
IgNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
XNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13, Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
NfNo
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
9No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ,rr.......................!.�...................................... ............ .................................................................... ...........................
................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
NNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
19No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
�(No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Nf No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
D(No
21, Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
KNo
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
1�(No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
E[No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
S:No
Reviewer/luspectar Name ;;s.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 7•- 3,9`� 7
cc: Division of Water duality, Water duality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97