20190424 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190403

D1�VR
�irlslan af Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
F Yes
C' No
Is this project a public transportation project?"
� Yes r No
Change only rf needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
20190424
Is a payment required for this project?*
f No paymentrequired
� Fee received
F Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Roadway Improvements to Prescot Glen Parkway
1a. Who is the PrimaryContact?*
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (POC: Danny Broach)
1b. PrimaryContact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
4/3/2019
Nearest Body of Water
UT to Twelvemile Creek
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
Twelvemile Creek - Class "C'
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
34.946490
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Union
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C' Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
,r! Section 404 Permit (�tlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
17 Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
Longitude:
-80.763608
Ve rsion# *
1
What amout is owed?*
r $zao.00
G $570.00
Select Project Reviewer"
Donna Hood:eads\drhood
1c. PrimaryContact Phone:*
[phone]
::

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes � No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
14 - Linear transportation
27 - Restoration
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
,r! 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
� Individual Permit
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after-the-fact permit application?*
f Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
C' Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
f Yes r No
Acceptance LetterAttachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
C' Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
f Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
fJ Owner rJ Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
C' Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Pinnade Financial Partners, Ina (POC: Danny Broach)
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
2d. Address
Street Address
3980 Premier Drive
Address Line 2
Suite 210
�Y
High Point
Postal / Zip Code
27265
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
r Riparian Buffer Authoriration
State / Rovince I F�gion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
*
r Yes � No
r Yes � No
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)

3a. Name:
Danny Broach
3b. Business Name:
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
3c.Address
Street Address
3980 Premier Drive
Address Line 2
Suite 210
�Y
High Point
Fbstal / Zip Code
27265
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:"
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(rf appropriate)
1 c. Nearest municipality l town:
Town of Waxhaw
2. Project Identification
2a. Propertyldentification Number:
2c. Project Address
Street Address
7621 Prescot Glen Parkway
Address Line 2
�Y
Waxhaw
Postal / Zip Code
28173
3. SurFace Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:"
UT to Twelvemile Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
Twelvemile Creek - Class "C'
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Catawba
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
0305010302
4. Project Description and History
S[ate / Rwince I Region
NC
Cauntry
USA
3e. Fax Number:
,.
2b. Property size:
0.7
S[ate / FYwince I Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project area is currently undeveloped and located in the right-of-way for Prescot Glen Parkway. Exsting land use in the vicinity of the project indudes, residential neighborhoods,
commercial development, and undeveloped forested/maintained properties.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
f Yes �' No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topogrephic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Figure 2. USGS Topo.pdf 1.25MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Figure 3. NRCS_Soil_Survey.pdf 572AKB

4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
265
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:"
The purpose of the project is to enhance traffic flow and traffic safety by constructing a roadway connection between bna ebsting sections of Prescot Glen Parkway. This connection will
provide residents a direct east/west connector alternative from Providence Road South to Waxhaw-Marvin Road. The proposed connector seeks to relieve the traffic burden through the
residential areas along Pine Oak Road and is designed for higher traffic volumes. The project is funded by a private entity; ho�ver, the improvements are required by the Town of
Waxhaw, in coordination with NCDOT.
4i. Describe the overell project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
To construct the proposed roadway connector, the project seeks to install dual Reinforced Concrete Box CuNerts (RCBCs) (12'x9' and 9'u6') which will result in 80 linear feet of
permanent impacts to potential non-wetland waters of the US. The culvert installation has been designed and will be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles will be
minimally altered. The primary box culvert will be installed 1-foot belowthe elevation of the stream bed to allow lowflow passage of water and aquatic life. The secondary box culvert is
offset to convey higher flow volumes during large storm events. Headwalls will be placed in a manner that the finished top elevation will not exceed that of the original stream bed in
order to prevent de-stabilization of the stream bed or banks downstream of the impact area.
In order to compensate for functional loss resulting from the installation of the culvert, the project seeks to conduct stream rehabilitation activities on 50 If upstream and 95 If
downstream of the proposed culvert crossing. A segmented channel rehabilitation approach will be implemented to create hydraulic and geomorphic functional uplift within the project
area. Stream rehabilitation activities will focus primarily on enhancing hydraulic geometry, improving bed form diversity and installation of in-stream structures. Stream banks will be
stabilized by grading the appropriate bank angles, installing coir fiber matting, and revegetation with a native seed mix and planting of wnody stems. The stream profile is modified to
create more local slope variability (i.e., steeper riffles and flat pools). Constructed riffles will be placed at culvert inlet and outlet to reduce discharge velocities, increase dissolved
oxygen levels and provide habitat for aquatic organisms (see attached Plan).
Installation of the proposed dual RCBCs will result in 80 linear feet of permanent impacts to potential non-wztland waters of the US. 145 linear feet of permanent, no-net loss impacts to
potential non-w�tland waters of the US are necessary to perform stream rehabilitation activities in order to provide functional aquatic uplift by implementing natural channel design
techniques. 20 linear feet of temporary impacts to potential non-wetland waters of the US are necessary in order to install impervious dikes and a pumped diversion to allowfor work in
dry conditions.
Track hoes and other earth moving equipment is anticipated to be used on this project.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
05_Complete_Figures.pdf 475MB
06_2019-04-02 Prescot Glen Parkway Plans_11x17.pdf 15.93MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
Sa. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the propertyor proposed impact areas?*
� Yes
r No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
C' Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified � Unknown r WA
Corps AID Number:
Sc. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn
Other:
Sd1. Jurisdictional determination upload
C' Unknown
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?"
� Yes r No
7b. If yes, explain.
The initial phase of the project, induding entitlements/rezoning, master planning, site planing, site design and mass-grading were conducted prior to 2007. Per the current property
owner, and based on historic aerial research, no potentially jurisdictional features were impacted during this phase of the development. All potential features identified on the property
during the initial phase were avoided, per the current property owner.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activit�R
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
r Wetlands �J Streams-tributaries � Buffers
r Open Waters I� Pond Construction

3. Stream Impacts
❑ 3a. Reason for impact (') 3b.lmpact type * 3a Type of impact* 3d. S. name * 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width* 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction" length"
S1 Culvert installation Permanent
32 Impervious Dike and Pumped Temporary
Diversion
S3
Stream rehabilitation and Permanent
stabilization
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
225
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
245
3j. Comments:
to West Fork- Twelvemile ��Perennial
to West Fork- Twelvemile ��Perennial
to West Fork- Twelvemile ��Perennial
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
20
Installation of the proposed dual RCBCs will result in 80 linear feet of permanent impacts to potential non-wetland waters of the US. 145 linear feet of
permanent, no-net loss impacts to potential non-w2tland waters of the US are necessary to perform stream rehabilitation activities in order to provide
functional aquatic uplift by implementing natural channel design techniques. 20 linear feet of temporary impacts to potential non-w2tland waters of the
US are necessary in order to install impervious dikes and a pumped diversion to allow for vrork in dry conditions.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Impacts have been avoided and minimized to the greatest ex[ent practicable and have been limited to wfiat is necessary for culvert installation and to
facilitate stream enhancement activities. Based on the location of the proposed connector, avoidance of stream impacts at this location would not allow
for the project purpose to be met. Minimization of stream impacts have been demonstrated by shortening the overall length of the culvert from 1201f to
801f by designing and implementing taller headwalls, mabmizing side slopes and installation of handrails.
1b. Specificallydescribe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
To prevent downstream sedimentation, construction will be conducted in dry conditions through the use of an impervious dike and a pumped
diversion. Temporary erosion and sediment control measures placed in waters will be removed and the original grade restored upon completion of the
project.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
� Yes
r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
r DWR
fJ Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
r Mitigation bank r Payment to in-lieu fee I� Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Sa. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan including mitigation credits generated.
In order to compensate for functional loss resulting from the installation of the culvert, the project seeks to conduct stream rehabilitation activities on
60 If upstream and 105 If downstream of the proposed culvert crossing. A segmented channel rehabilitation approach will be implemented to create
hydraulic and geomorphic functional uplift within the project area. Stream rehabilitation activities will focus primarily on enhancing hydraulic geometry,
improving bed form diversity and installation of in-stream structures. Stream banks will be stabilized by grading the appropriate bank angles, installing
coir fiber matting, and revegetation with a native seed mix and planting of wroody stems. The stream profile is modified to create more local slope
variability (i.e., steeper riffles and flat pools). Constructed riffles will be placed at culvert inlet and outlet to reduce discharge velocities, increase
dissolved oxygen levels and provide habitat for aquatic organisms (see attached Plan).
The project area is located within the highly urbanized Lower Catawba watershed (HUC 03050103). Currently, there are no private mitigation banks
with available stream credits to offset losses of aquatic function from development to service the watershed. The loss of functions in this setting and in
the proposed quantities necessitates compensatory mitigation to ensure that cumulative impacts to onsite and downstream aquatic resources are
individually and cumulatively minimal. Rather than meeting compensatory mitigation requirements by paying in-lieu to the Department of Mitigation
Services, the project proposes to offset impacts associated with the installation of the culvert by performing on-site stream enhancement activities
along Stream A as described above.
Following construction, permanent reference photo locations will be established and documented for three (3) years following construction in order to
demonstrate stability.
1� 80
Average (feet) (linear feet)
1� 20
Average(feet) Qinearfeet)
10 1145
Average(feet) � Qinearfeet)
�
Sb. Mitigation Plan Upload

Pla nSheet_Mitigation_Prescot. pdf
705.68KB
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
� Yes r No
If no, explain why:
Does not include nor is adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within on the the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
C' Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
F Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federallstate/local) funds or the use of public (federallstate) land? *
C' Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
f Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
� Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project seeks to improve downstream water quality through sUeam rehabilitation activities. During the initial phase of the project, stormwater
detention measures were installed to prevent degradation of downstream water quality. No additional future development is anticipated at this time.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r No r WA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat7 *
C' Yes r No
Sb. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
F Yes r No
Sc. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
Sd. Is another Federal agency involved?*
f Yes r No
Se. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
C' Yes r No
Sf. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
f• Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
C' Yes r No
Sh. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
�' Unknown

C' Yes r No
Si. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
f Yes r No
S. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on March 21, 2019 did not indicate known occurrences of threatened or
endangered species �nnthin the project boundary. Dewberry conducted a pedestrian survey Oct. 15, 2018 and concluded that the project will have No
Effect on Michau�s Sumac (Rhus michaubi) or Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii). (See attached NCNHP and USFWS Report)
Consultation Documentation Upload
2018.10.15 Prescott Glen Pkwy USFWS Project Review Letter.pdf
11 _Prescot_NC NHP. p df
18-379 Prescott Glen Parkway Bridge.pdf
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
C' Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NCNHP element occurrence database did not indicate the presence of EFH within the project boundary.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
9.19MB
1.02 MB
120.56KB
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
C' Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
A review of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS Service database on March 21, 2019 did not indicate any
cultural or historic resources w�thin the project boundary.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?"
� Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
A flood impact analysis report. no-rise impact certification, and individual floodplain development permit will be submitted to Town of Waxhaw
(submitted 3/21/2019) for reviewand approval prior to construction/restoration activities. The results of the flood impact analysis showthat there is no
net increase in base flood elevations.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FIRM Panels 4473 and 4474 (effective 10/16/2005)
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previouslyrequested.
00_Prescot_Complete_PCN. pdf
Signature
*
CJ By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
39.42MB
• I have given true., accurate, and complete information on this form;
. I agree that submission of this PCN form is a"transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions AcY');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions AcP');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Chris Tinklenberg
Signature
�'�/r-t��I c'rr,�l�°r�%t °-t�
�
Date
4/3/2019