20190423 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190403

DWR
IDIOM n of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
tial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned * Version#*
20190423 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required
What amout is owed?*
* Fee received
r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office*
Select Project Reviewer*
Asheville Regional Office - [phone]
Zan Price:eads\gaprice
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Retreat at Arden Farms
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Jason Foster, P.E.
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
4/3/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Unnamed Tributary to French Broad River
Basin
Broad
Water Classification
B
Site Coordinates
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Latitude: Longitude:
35.475413 -82.567604
FA. Processing Information U
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Buncombe
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
* Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
rJ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
F- Regional General Permit (RGP)
F Standard (IP)

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
F Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
F Individual Permit
29 - Residential Developments
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: r Yes r No
For the record only for Corps Permit: r Yes r No
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
O Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
F_ Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Tynes Development Corporation
2b. Deed book and page no.:
9634-86-7547
2c. Responsible party:
Ingram Tynes
2d. Address
Street Address
820 Shades Creek Parkway, Suite 200
Address Line 2
CKY
Birmingham
F stal / Zip Code
35209
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Jason Foster, P.E.
State / Frovinoe / fbgion
AL
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:

3b. Business Name:
Civil Design Concepts, PA
3c. Address
Street Address
168 Patton Avenue
Address Line 2
aty
Asheville
Postal / Zip Code
28801
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town
Arden, NC
State / Rovince / Pagim
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
9634-87-3671; 9634-86-7547; 9634-87-3103; 2b. Property size:
9634-87-1028;9634-86-2977 29.19
2c. Project Address
Street Address
539 Long Shoals Road
Address Line 2
City
Arden
Postal / Zip Code
28704
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Unnamed Tributary to French Broad River
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
B
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Broad
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
060101050705
4. Project Description and History
State / Rovince / F agion
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The Parcel is currently a single family residential lot consisting of open fields and forested areas. The site contains a small pond and channel that flows to the French Broad River
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
f Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
USGS.pdf 28.56MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Soils Report.pdf 828.61 KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:

564
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The intent of the project is to install a culvert across the small unnamed tributary and cross the tributary with a sanitary sewer line.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project Will utilize earth moving and compacting equipment and typical construction equipment to install pipe, road and sewer infrastructure.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
2019-04-01_PCN Bulletin Plan (1).pdf 542.36KB
2019-04-01 PCN Bulletin Profile (1).pdf 82.6KB
2019 -04 -02 -PCN Form—Arden Farms DRAFT1.pdf 97.35KB
2019-04-03_24x36 11843 Storm USACE.pdf 4.04MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
f Yes r No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If Sa is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
r Unknown
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
r Wetlands W Streams -tributaries
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
❑ Buffers
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
58
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
97
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
39
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type *
3f. Type of
3g. S. width*
3h. Impact
❑
M
Jurisdiction*
length*
S1
Culvert
Permanent
Culvert
Unknown
Perennial
Corps4
58
Average (fee[)
(linear feet)
S2
Construction of Culvert
Tem orar
P y
Stabilization
Unknown
Perennial
Corps4
19
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S3
Sewer Pipe
Temporary
Other
Unkown
Perennial
Corps
4
20
Aver�e(feet)
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
58
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
97
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
39

3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The proposed culvert installation is to allow a single crossing as needed to develop the opposite side of the stream and then install a sewer line for the
proposed development. The proposed culvert and sewer crossing have been designed to minimize the proposed impacts to the stream by avoiding
excessive construction in the vicinity of the crossings.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Skimmer basins, buffering, silt fencing, temporary & permanent diversion ditches, and other best management practices will be used to prevent
sediment from impacting the unnamed tributary.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r^ Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
The project is proposing bio -retention cells and energy dissipation for the design storm event. Bio -retention will provide the necessary TSS & TN removal outside of the riparian buffer.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This is a residential development. No future impacts should be the result of this development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor WA
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
This project will collect sewer in a distribution on site to a pump station that will discharge sewer directly the the Buncombe County Metropolitan
Sewerage District Sewer System.

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
r Unknown
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
USFWS IPaC Resources List
Consultation Documentation Upload
IPaC Docs.pdf 261.11 KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
USFWS IPaC Resources List
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
North Carolina Listings in the National Register of Historic Places
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Flood Map
[Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Signature
*
,W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
. I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");

• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a vritten signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Jason Foster
Signature
'I'Mg f&
Date
4/3/2019

C)
0
0
c
m
C)
z
n
m
r
m
m
z
U)
m
x
co
C)
C)
z
mCD
c
r
m
z
m0
D
D
D
�0
v
m
Tz
'1
D
o
(n
0
N
N
%Z'6
F
118
ZZHW–ZZHW
1d12J31dW
Z
H10N31
2Z C
m
2 y
0 X
DTD z
X
DD
X G
m<
mw m
m
''�
a m!^
oNo In Z
Ru
N
A AwJ m
N I<II
w W Z
<Ni,oil'i so
oww m
SB
�n
(H) 'll Ob = 4OuI L W
09 of oz o
�0
as
2ZHW ®�
SB se as
SB d „z
8S —
8S
�— ss��
(2S) i0VdVll VW3b1S .,dV I0dW31
SS
1N3W3SVON3 1331S „91 03SOdMJd
dIO „8
Ft �-
Is
4ZZHV4
8S`
0g �z
,Ad(I 3H1 NI„ O3MOJ0 i3d 38 MVO
>QJOM llb' iVHl OS A3A1f1O O3SOdO�ld
30 NOliV-nViSNI OMjn0 M013
VW3�I1S SSVdA9 llVHS WIOVd UNOO
(LS) lOVdWl VW3aS 1N3NVMJ3d
oS
z I I
r'' cncn
cor
i
m
o
oo
T T m
T Tom- T T T T T
dIO
%Z'6
,99
118
ZZHW–ZZHW
1d12J31dW
3cJMS
H10N31
3ZIS
3WdN 3dld
(S30(13 301SN1 Ol H10N31 0Z NO 03Sb'8 S3dOlS)
3l8`dl 3dld
(r aull woo}S)
dO8 n SSVO „02
dOd n SSV -10
%L'l
(ZZHW–ZZHW) S'82 LZ 1f10 'ANI
„0c
or–Lr
310HMdW
1=,8'LL
(2ZHW-01018) L'Z-VLZ NI 'ANI
99+ZL
ZZHW
(S30O3 3OISN1 Ol HlON3l OZ NO
318b'1 3dld
O3S` 9 S3dMS)
2,09 LZ WRi
(ZZHW–ZZHW) Z*mZ 1f10 'ANI
310HNVIN
T -,Z'8
(ZZHW–ZZHW) -V'Z2 LZ NI 'ANI
99+L l
ZZHW
-V'O-VLZ IN18
N011dlZIOS30
H1d3O
S11VI30 3�If11On&s
NOIIVIS
3bf11On&s
(S3003 3OISN1 Ol H10N31 OZ NO (13S` 9 SA3AN1)
318`dl 3binio &s
(r aull woo}S)
dO8 n SSVO „02
dOd n SSV -10
%L'l
Z9
„0c
or–Lr
lvl1 jlivvq
3dMS
H10N31
3ZIS
3VIVN 3dld
(S30O3 3OISN1 Ol HlON3l OZ NO
318b'1 3dld
O3S` 9 S3dMS)
2'OSLZ 1f10 *ANI
38niondis(or–Lr)
:F'0 0 L
(Lr–ZX3) 2'LS LZ NI *ANI
99+0L
Lr
iMJH1 N3dO
0'09 LZ W18
llVM0b'3H
y/N,
(Or–W) L'6-VLZ NI 'ANI
OO+OL
Or
0 29 LZ W12l
NOIldIdOS30
H1d30
Slldl30 38nion8is
NOIl`d1S
38nion8is
(S3003 301SN1 Ol Hl0N3l 0Z NO (13Sd8 Si83ANl)
319VI 38nionas

z
(n)
V3 = 4Oul L
m
o --1o
C) m
91
8 ti
m CD (H)
D z:1
'31 Ot, = 4Ou! L
1W �]:]M:IS
F :1W W�]01S
08
04 OZ
0
D
0
0
U1
O)
O
O
O
O
O
O
+
J
+
O
D
00IZ
�OIZ
O
02IZ
—02 [z
v<0DX
Z
<< y p
Z
O Z
N
O
Nul+ O
OIIZ---
—�IIZ
C ..
O)+j
No
W p
X 00
Ot IZ N U, oCTI
(�
�-� IZ
J iF
o C4
1003 l 030038N1
CA^
� 38 Ol 3dld 03SOd02ld
O
<0��
ADO
«<o��--
-0Dp
f x
N
0
..
�^
«41 O Lo o
pZ
OZZ
N�
--
0
V/ O
\
�Dp
O ZN��
C..N
NN±=
C
2
O_
vv
O
-u
OZIZ —
..
jON�
0
C4+
N N NOc000
—oz [z
Z z�
«� D o
��+p 002
N) L4 N
Woo
a, �
OS LZ---
S LZ
ZJJ
W
0i
m
CO
W+
N^
N
N =
=K:
W
O N
--
^
M N
N
= --
E:
m
W W
W N FF
K=
S W
1p
_
z
N
2 v
-u
W
cn
0
N o
02 lZ —
2 rNv
�'"
v
�L ® OAd .B-3169
O O
LZ
09 LZ-- _.
---09 LZ
'
W I
% L' L ® dO2J n SSV -10 „ 02-3�ZS
2 N
a
—
—
® dINO „8
-3 -IL l
30b'�19 03SOd02�d
np Ci
0� LZ
0 l
� —�1� LZ
OL
�. 0
— --
[Z--
-0L LZ
ccn -
/
0 (a
CD CD
N •a
1
I�w
%2'l ®OAd
9
/
„S-3lLOl
30b2�O ONIISIX3
H n
n
30V' 10 03SOdO2Jd
0
a
(S�IVi30 33S) ST1VM AOIHl
OS IZ
L
HIM 3dld 1N3W3SVON3
---09 LZ
3331S ••9L 03SOdO8d
F
30dd9 9NI1SIX3
>�
2 Z 'c 2 y l
X m< X m G
mw m'm'm�
m!^ m oNo w!^ 2
N Nn(n N N ZD
N N C N N
m
N N
om ow m 09IZ
---09 1z

DEVELOPMENT DATA
OWNER/DEVELOPER: TYNES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
820 SHADES CREEK PARKWAY, SUITE 2300
BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209
CONTACT: INGRAM TYNES
[phone]
CIVIL ENGINEER: CIVIL DESIGN CONCEPTS, P.A.
168 PATTON AVENUE
ASHEVILLE, INC 28801
CONTACT: JASON FOSTER, P.E.
[phone]
ARCHITECT: PUCCIANO & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
3084 MERCER UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 110
ATLANTA, GA 30341
CONTACT: MARY PUCCIANO
[phone]
RETRE
AT
AT
ARDEN F
BUNCOMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR:
TYNES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
820 SHADES CREEK PARKWAY, SUITE 2300
BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209
INGRAM TYNES
[phone]
SHEET LIST TABLE
Sheet
Number Sheet Title
C000
COVER
C001
SURVEY
C101
EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMOLITION PLAN
C200
MASTER SITE PLAN
C201
SITE PLAN WEST
C202
SITE PLAN EAST
C203
SITE PLAN SOUTH
C204
ROAD PROFILES
C205
ROAD PROFILES
C206
ROAD PROFILES
C301
PHASE 1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C302
PHASE 2 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C303
PHASE 3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C400
MASTER FINE GRADING PLAN
C401
FINE GRADING PLAN WEST
C402
FINE GRADING PLAN EAST
C403
FINE GRADING PLAN SOUTH
C500
MASTER STORM DRAINAGE PLAN
C501
STORM DRAINAGE PLAN WEST
C502
STORM DRAINAGE PLAN EAST
C503
STORM DRAINAGE PLAN SOUTH
C504
STORM PROFILES
C505
STORM PROFILES
C506
STORM PROFILES
C507
STORM PROFILES
C600
MASTER WATER PLAN
C601
WATER PLAN WEST
C602
WATER PLAN EAST
C603
WATER PLAN SOUTH
C700
MASTER SEWER PLAN
C701
SEWER PLAN WEST
C702
SEWER PLAN EAST
C703
SEWER PLAN SOUTH
C704
SEWER PROFILES
C705
SEWER PROFILES
C706
SEWER FORCEMAIN PROFILES
C921
SITE DETAILS
C922
SITE DETAILS
C923
SITE DETAILS
C931
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
C932
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
C933
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
C934
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
C935
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
C951
STORM DETAILS
C952
STORM DETAILS
C953
STORM BMP DETAILS
C954
STORM BMP DETAILS
C955
STORM BMP DETAILS
C961
WATER DETAILS
C971
SEWER DETAILS
C972
SEWER DETAILS
C973
SEWER PUMP STATION DETAILS
LONG SHOALS ROAD WIDENING SUB SETT
Sheet Number
Sheet Title
02
C212
LONG SHOALS ROAD
STRIPING PLAN
C213
LONG SHOALS ROAD
PAVING AND OVERLAY PLAN
C214
LONG SHOALS ROAD
GRADING PLAN
C215
LONG SHOALS ROAD
PROFILE AND SECTIONS
C216
LONG SHOALS ROAD
UTILITY AND UTILITY RELOCATION PLAN
C222
NCDOT DETAILS
ROCKWOOD LN
C226
UTILITY DETAILS
N
LO
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
Know what's below.
0111 before you dig.
W O M CO W CLO
ti
02
�o
�Ao
"9p
Z
Z
Z
z
W a0 a0
W
F�
O J v
146
a w Z Q
W X
N W
CO20LL
m
DILL
H
�o
Z Q a
a �
ROCKWOOD LN
3
a
N
LO
G
9� �q
m
az
0
p
J
SUBJECT INTERSTATE
0
PROPERTY
O
L
Ir W
26
0
of
W
D
Of
Qf
0
z
g
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
Know what's below.
0111 before you dig.
W O M CO W CLO
W W O 1111 — L0
W N L
H 0 It 0
> 04 04
a N N
04
to
V�
Z
Z
Z
z
W a0 a0
W
00 a0
O J v
W00
W 000
(n>
a w Z Q
W X
N W
CO20LL
m
DILL
H
Q a
Z Q a
a �
3
a
N
LO
FR
O
U
N
Q
N
U
r-
0 O
U
C
M
.y
N
2
U
3
3
3
It
ao
T
N
0
w
z
LU
0
J
N
J
W
CO
U
z
n
�INIMI I I I�
jI z
ch ir
LLL o
ON�G oR1G O
a ���� 0 U
J
U
0
0
a
z
LL
z
F -
Z
Z0
D
W
w
m
Q
o
U
z
M
M
z
0
Q
a
0
0
o_
ch
o
v
az
H
w
0
J
w
O
L
Ir W
w
N
>
oIt
W
m
z
V)
Z
~
O
0N
Z0�
(�
W
Q
W
Of
U
w
w
o��
MSV)
(n0
U
O
m
00
W
00
O
O
O
�INIMI I I I�
jI z
ch ir
LLL o
ON�G oR1G O
a ���� 0 U
DRAWN BY: RWW
CDC PROJECT NO.: 11843
MSD PROJECT NO.: 2018207
COA WATER: WPFY-18-19-024
SHEET
C000
O
U
0
0
a
z
LL
z
F -
Z
Z0
D
W
w
m
Q
o
U
z
M
M
z
0
Q
a
0
0
o_
ch
o
v
az
W
w
oc
J
w
O
L
Ir W
w
N
>
oIt
w
z
F -
DRAWN BY: RWW
CDC PROJECT NO.: 11843
MSD PROJECT NO.: 2018207
COA WATER: WPFY-18-19-024
SHEET
C000

STORM LEGEND
EXISTING STORM PIPE
PROPOSED STORM STRUCTURE
PROPOSED STORM PIPE
PROPOSED HEADWALL
PROPOSED RIP -RAP APRON
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION
N - N
Uj
Z�mNq)m ��N -� �¢ V�V- C
E_w° ���-¢ °o zw
,wUO2w� mz mw�N n mQ� o�
mmvw�p�
LnZu �- n vi Nmzw-
n�mz�° ��U�w�d�oznQ mW�o�v
�N°wo m m
PROPOSED ROOF LEADER (TYP) I m v= z Q m m m
z ° mU�nzwN N o ��
m� ro m m
� ONN
z_ww
°
o ui
Q
° ¢
m
m °
-� vmQnzWQ —1 _j a�
At
NOTES
1. SEE GRADING, EROSION CONTROL, AND STORM DRAINAGE DETAIL
SHEETS FOR ALL GENERAL NOTES. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE
FOR INCLUSION OF DETAILS SHEETS WITH ALL PLANS.
2. NO PORTION OF THIS PROJECT LIES WITHIN THE 100 -YR FEMA
FLOODPLAIN.
3. HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP B.
4. RETAINING WALLS:
ALL RETAINING WALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE FROM TOP OF WALL
TO FINISH GRADE ELEVATION. CONTRACTOR TO ACCOUNT FOR
FOOTER/COVER OVER FOOTER. REFER TO WALL DESIGN FOR
FOOTER DESIGN. WALL DESIGN TO ALSO ACCOMMODATE STORM
PIPE PENETRATIONS PER PLANS.
WALL DESIGN TO INCLUDE FOOTING DRAIN AND MINIMUM WIDTH OF
12" OF #57 WASHED STONE BEHIND WALL FROM BOTTOM TO TOP
OF WALL.
ALL RETAINING WALLS PROVIDING A CHANGE OF GRADE OF 30"
OR MORE SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH A GUARDRAIL. THE
GUARDRAIL SHALL BE 42" MINIMUM IN HEIGHT, AND PREVENT THE
PASSAGE OF A 21" SPHERE UNLESS ADJACENT TO A WALKING
SURFACE. COORDINATE BARRIER STYLE AND COLOR WITH
ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER. SEE SITE PLAN FOR APPROXIMATE
LOCATION OF FENCING/BARRIERS.
CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT TO OWNER AND ENGINEER FOR REVIEW
PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE
WALL STYLE AND COLOR WITH ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER.
CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING BUILDING PERMIT FOR
ALL RETAINING WALLS PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR
CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTING
RETAINING WALLS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL WALL
MANUFACTURERS STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
ALL RETAINING WALLS 4' OR GREATER TO BE SUBMITTED TO CITY
OF CITY OF ASHEVILLE BUILDING SAFETY DIVISION FOR REVIEW
AND APPROVAL AND CERTIFIED BY THE WALL ENGINEER UPON
COMPLETION. RETAINING WALLS SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL
LANDSCAPING DEPENDING ON HEIGHT AND MATERIAL.
z�
Z_\ _g \
mm��
�W
ILo i00
'TQN
Q`m��� Iwo Q
1
Zwo \
_-_ -- �� wz mUU�C)
--�� r 40 '` Q
z wore BUIL _
PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE PIPE I - bbsreF BUILDING#, m
/ AD
(TYP) P�,66reE e• �_ v � � - - -- — _"
Z
-' 2160 \ PROPOSED RIP RAP APRON
V(Y)(EDETAIL)
o o \
`
� S TP SE\ �
Po m A y PROPOSED BIO -RETENTION CELL
�1 _ / �a y �F y 9
I / v d b �\ (TYP)(SEE DETAIL)
B
z
110
2140
D B coNNEcz 0 �j� AV �S S� y y A VA VA
R tp 6J In C
O / O A ROP / �\
z�QNj- \\\ �"°�—__ I 2°P // ��/ I {
{
o�
SEE SKEET 50 / �- o # o \
C� \ ma n o
R
O,9
B
zb,
E
/, EMENT FFE
� \ � I I I � 1�:�: � �
p5T0 9
'
y
?001 Rm",�'
Od
- ° 9S
_-
2
—17
1 •� i -10 / V/ / � O A � � � _-_ u � �Gb �� \ /� / � — y v\vvv � � yv � I 77
7
I' 2 / / \ I N� \ \ \ \ t — 2200
PROPOSED PERMANENT - �' _ � / -- � / ��' / '� � \ � \ \ I
DIVERSION DITCH #1
PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE N I V - / / 2210
ME Tt ,z,bo I STRUCTURE (TYP)If
v��
if
\ _
M N��2155.2 O I 3a / ,Y
2210 o PROPOSED PERMANENT I \ / _ �� = - -
/ I pD z Q DIVERSION DITCH #3-
--w�
°< I I
PROPOSED PERMANENT —
o o N ro J �j ` ' / DIVERSION DITCH #2CLI PROPOSED PERMANENT
zv 27/ mLN�� -�/ ����� DIVERSION DITCH #5
�wm�zUQ 0��� '� — �o°�w� - i -CZ
m�~O- N - rower ..zU w w
Q o m N o - �/ I z °o A A I PROPOSED PERMANENT
° o_oo� \ o o ��o w DIVERSION DITCH #4 I
/ / zvo /' N �°N �U
/ �� mDz
f / / /I J,\:.` I 220 �ozQ
u 2 _ NDN
%: of o o� z°o I \
\ v
I
a° Pezzo,o °
mU� Q UL I W
\ \ N \ w _a�N-W o°m c
°�m� RN�� I °�
w�z° roz° ov �i o m
v �� o�ONZW vzmz�Q w°m< ro o� ��ro Q I O °
° �n �'n z �0 V V m N z W N
M �z°�w� U z� m -w m° Q w mw -
_ y ro w °�
"OLZN m�CZJv m����N lm9�o �o roN\� NQ�
i Z ti
m� L_ w l9 0 � W_ O .. 4 � Q Q z w
Iii oQu zero z�w w z�m NwN m�Ozw� nroU�W�
�N \ \12 o I wU Wim° zoo �vnp�� °�z��oQ
zoo a �y DE, mo °zDz°
�.}/! �� --- •, w� I ° z z�° `9»,190
oz2270 I O w
N
�Zz \
w \ \ m
\ g
T
tip
�O
:An yp
MIR
�a
C
ROCKWOOD LN
o-
Uj
Uj
L
m
o
26
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
DEVELOPMENT DATA
9634-87-3671:
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
TYNES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
9634-87-3103;
820 SHADES CREEK PARKWAY, SUITE 2300
TYPE 1
BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209
CONTACT:
INGRAM TYNES
521; 531;
[phone]
CIVIL ENGINEER:
CIVIL DESIGN CONCEPTS, P.A.
SHOALS ROAD
168 PATTON AVENUE
1593/356:
ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
CONTACT:
JASON FOSTER, P.E.
BUILDING 4
[phone]
SURVEYOR:
ED HOLMES AND ASSOCIATES
SETBACKS
300 RIDGEFIELD CT. SUITE 301
TYPE V
ASHEVILLE, NC 28806
CONTACT:
JOE KANE, P.L.S.
SIDES:
[phone]
ARCHITECT:
PUCCIANO & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
20'
3084 MERCER UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 110
TYPE VI
ATLANTA, GA 30341
CONTACT:
MARY PUCCIANO
BUILDING 8
[phone]
PROJECT DATA
32,675
PIN:
9634-87-3671:
9634-86-7547;
GFA
9634-87-3103;
9634-87-1028;
TYPE 1
9634-86-2977
20,631
ADDRESS:
521; 531;
533; 537;
38'-7"
539 LONG
SHOALS ROAD
DEED BOOK/PAGE:
1593/356:
358
SITE ACREAGE:
29.19 ACRES
BUILDING 4
ZONING:
R-2
6,001
SETBACKS
BUILDING 5
TYPE V
FRONT:
20'
36
SIDES:
10'
25'
REAR:
20'
BUILDING 7
DISTURBED AREA: 20.7 AC
PROPOSED UNITS 319 MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS
DENSITY SUMMARY:
ALLOWED: 12 UNITS/ACRE = 338 RESIDENTIAL UNITS
PROPOSED: 11.3 UNITS/ACRE
PARKING CALCULATIONS:
VEHICULAR:
REQUIRED SPACES: (1.75 SPACES PER UNIT)
REQUIRED PROVIDED
SPACES PROVIDED: 559 559
HANDICAPPED SPACES:
SPACES REQUIRED: 11 SPACES PROVIDED: 21
BUILDING DATA:
BUILDING
DESCRIPTION
HEIGHT
GFA
UNITS
BUILDING 1
TYPE 1
38'-4"
20,631
42
BUILDING 2
TYPE 11
38'-7"
38,156
70
BUILDING 3
TYPE 111
38'-11"
18,562
36
BUILDING 4
TYPE IV
26'-4"
6,001
10
BUILDING 5
TYPE V
39'-4"
13,959
36
BUILDING 6
TYPE VI
25'
2,766
2
BUILDING 7
TYPE VI
25'
2,766
2
BUILDING 8
TYPE VII
38-7"
32,675
56
BUILDING 9
TYPE VI
25'
2,766
2
BUILDING 10
TYPE VII
38-7"
32,675
56
CLUBHOUSE
CLUBHOUSE
26'-6"
6,491
IMPERVIOUS
CALCULATIONS:
z
o
IMPERVIOUS PERVIOUS
PRE -DEVELOPMENT: 1.50 ACRES (5%) 27.0 ACRES (95%)
POST -DEVELOPMENT: 10.0 ACRES (35%) 18.5 ACRES (65%)
SOIL TYPES: CuC, CuD, EvD2, TaC, TaD
HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP: B
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
NORTH
MASTER STORM DRAINAGE PLAN
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 200
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 ft.
0
q
Q N
a
a
.. 0
U) °
Q
It
co
T
N
U
W
0
Z
W
U
J
J
W
m
U
Z
J
WCD N co N
H co 7 LO
N N
N
N
V'T
z Z
Z W aD aD
z
Z
H 00 aD
O_1 W ONVO
W LU J V W
a w Z Q
Cn> W X
ap 2 0 LL
W
N W O LL
Q a
Z Q a
U)
a�
3
o
N
LO
0
q
Q N
a
a
.. 0
U) °
Q
It
co
T
N
U
W
0
Z
W
U
J
J
W
m
U
Z
m7- In -
00 � LTJ
1
o mo 0
�INIMI I I ISI
i
i
♦^
V5,
J
�
Q
U
G
Elf
0
0
z
ILLz
D
Z
C)
C)
W
W
m
U)
O
v
z
D
m
o
z
o
z �
�
Q
Q
Q
o
LLJ
Elf
0
W
z
W
a_
w
m
z
w W�
�
Q
W
z
V)
z
DRAWN BY:
RWW
z
11843
cn
o_
z
o
�
~
LLIW
U
0
�R:
U�
LLJ
mi
o
o
ao�
o
~
V)
C)
00
m7- In -
00 � LTJ
1
o mo 0
�INIMI I I ISI
i
i
♦^
V5,
o
m
Q
U
G
Elf
0
0
z
ILLz
D
Z
C)
C)
W
W
m
O
v
z
D
m
o
z
o
z �
�
Q
Q
Q
o
LLJ
Elf
Q
z Q
a
W
z
W
a_
0_
0
0
W
LJJ
w W�
�
Q
W
z
DRAWN BY:
RWW
CDC PROJECT NO.:
11843
MSD PROJECT NO.: 2018207
COA WATER: WPFY-18-19-024
SHEET

STRUCTURE TABLE
(INVERTS BASED ON 2D LENGTH TO INSIDE EDGES)
STRUCTURE
STATION
STRUCTURE DETAILS
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION
24"
85'
RIM 2163.4
HDPE
C5 -C4
C3
12+71
INV. IN 2155.8 (C4 -C3)
7,7'±
CURB INLET
15"
124'
INV. OUT 2155.7 (C3 -C2)
HDPE
E4 -E3
E1
10+24
RIM 2174.4
11.5'±
CURB INLET
C4
13+58
INV. IN 2160.9 (C5 -C4)
13.6'±
CURB INLET
15"
29'
INV. OUT 2160.8 (C4 -C3)
HDPE
F7 -F1
E2
11+76
RIM 2171.1
9.9'±
GRATE INLET
C5
14+72
INV. IN 2161.9 (C6-05)
9.7'±
CURB INLET
25'
2,766
INV. OUT 2161.4 (C5 -C4)
BUILDING 10
TYPE VII
PIPE TABLE
(SLOPES BASED ON 2D LENGTH TO INSIDE EDGES)
PIPE NAME
SIZE
LENGTH
SLOPE
MATERIAL
C4 -C3
24"
85'
5.9%
HDPE
C5 -C4
24"
111'
0.5%
HDPE
PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE PIPE
(TYP)(SEE PIPE TABLE)
/ PROPOSED CURB INLET
/ (TYP)(SEE STRUCTURE TABLE)
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ PROPOSED GRATE INLET
STRUCTURE TABLE
(INVERTS BASED ON 2D LENGTH TO INSIDE EDGES)
STRUCTURE
STATION
STRUCTURE DETAILS
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION
18"
22'
RIM 2156.7FLARED
HDPE
E2 -E1
EO
10+00
INV. IN 2155.0 (E1 -EO)
N /A
END SECTION
15"
124'
RIM 2166.7
HDPE
E4 -E3
E1
10+24
INV. IN 2155.3 (E2 -E1)
11.5'±
CURB INLET
18"
152'
INV. OUT 2155.2 (E1 -EO)
HDPE
D7 -D6
15"
29'
RIM 2166.7
HDPE
F7 -F1
E2
11+76
INV. IN 2157.0 (E3 -E2)
9.9'±
GRATE INLET
D2
12+24
INV. OUT 2156.7 (E2 -E1)
8.5'±
CURB INLET
25'
2,766
RIM 2165.5
BUILDING 10
TYPE VII
E3
13+03
INV. IN 2158.1 (E4 -E3)
7.5'±
CURB INLET
D3
13+15
INV. OUT 2158.0 (E3 -E2)
10.6'±
CURB INLET
RIM 2165.4
E4
14+03
INV. OUT 2159.11 (E4 -E3)
6.3'±
CURB INLET
PIPE TABLE
(SLOPES BASED ON 2D LENGTH TO INSIDE EDGES)
PIPE NAME
SIZE
LENGTH
SLOPE
MATERIAL
E1 -EO
18"
22'
0.9%
HDPE
E2 -E1
18"
149'
0.9%
HDPE
E3 -E2
15"
124'
0.8%
HDPE
E4 -E3
15"
98'
1.0%
HDPE
(TYP)(SEE STRUCTURE TABLE)
/ ,m ROAD B= - ss
W E4
- - - - -
/ /
SB
SQ
a °
C4 - � . �G \ \ �\ V A \ S� PROPOSED HEADWALL
/0 ��� \ \ \ �� RIP RAP APRON
�� A A \ \ \ V A ` (TYP)(SEE DETAIL)
o� ��\ \ \� \
`\/\ 9��s�
%-, -V PROPOSED OUTLET CONTROL
/ / / �� �� V, A A STRUCTURE (TYP)(SEE DETAIL)
E2
\ \ \ \ PROPOSED BIO -RETENTION CELL 'E'
=G �� /
�I7. SEE DETAIL
2 �
Tel
ALL DOWNSPOUT COLLECTOR PIPES SHALL BE 12" HDPE WITH
WATERTIGHT PUSH ON JOINTS, WYES, FITTINGS AND COUPLINGS
AS REQUIRED TO TIE-IN ALL DOWNSPOUT LEADERS AND ROOF
DRAINS FROM THE BUILDINGS. COLLECTOR PIPES SHALL HAVE 18"
/ �GZ COVER MINIMUM AND BE AT 1.0% MIN. SLOPE (TYP).
C5
� � � i° rn�Y 1, \, \ � I \ m � - �_ - _ 2js � \ CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE CONNECTION LOCATION WITH
N \ 0 \ ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. (SEE DETAIL) (TYP)
o Cn / ,---
�- 1
I I i
� D7 �
F9AIAI�-
L � -
I I cn /
XIOSK
•
e
AN
/ ----- I - -
a a a a
_ 0 I °---E1 �� �3 �h�� m ss
1 ♦ - -
\ � �3a,615 sF
° ---- �
l oo �I, I / / ' / �� _
4 : � � � I / / / � / 314 sz BASEMENz
/ �,
°
o z t1 -- � � � 41, / / //MAINFFE.a11lo
m
-----_ - -
- -- I - �\
°
° °
:{1 - /
° f
° '78 I 0 �� � I, J 1 V / /; ° - -
° °
°
°•
/ � 4
Ln
s03
o / /
STORM LEGEND
(INVERTS BASED ON 2D LENGTH TO INSIDE EDGES)
EXISTING STORM PIPE
- - - - - -
PROPOSED STORM STRUCTURE
DEPTH
PROPOSED STORM PIPE
DO
PROPOSED HEADWALL
RIM 2156.7
INV. IN 2155.0 (D1 -D0)
PROPOSED RIP -RAP APRON04
FLARED END SECTION
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION
.
STRUCTURE TABLE
(INVERTS BASED ON 2D LENGTH TO INSIDE EDGES)
STRUCTURE
STATION
STRUCTURE DETAILS
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION
DO
10+00
RIM 2156.7
INV. IN 2155.0 (D1 -D0)
N/A
FLARED END SECTION
15"
198'
RIM 2165.7
HDPE
D3 -D2
15"
89'
INV. IN 2159.0 (D2 -D1)
HDPE
D5 -D1
D1
10+24
INV. IN 2159.3 (D5 -D1)
9.8'±
CURB INLET
18"
152'
INV. OUT 2155.9 (D1 -DO)
HDPE
D7 -D6
15"
29'
RIM 2180.9
HDPE
F7 -F1
15"
44'
INV. IN 2172.6 (D3 -D2)
HDPE
F9 -F8
D2
12+24
INV. IN 2172.4 (D6 -D2)
8.5'±
CURB INLET
25'
2,766
INV. OUT 2172.3 (D2 -D1)
BUILDING 10
TYPE VII
38-7"
32,675
RIM 2190.3
CLUBHOUSE
CLUBHOUSE
D3
13+15
INV. IN 2179.8 (D4 -D3)
10.6'±
CURB INLET
INV. OUT 2179.7 (D3 -D2)
RIM 2163.5
D5
10+82
INV. OUT 2160.11 (D5 -D1)
3.5'±
CURB INLET
RIM 2177.7
D6
11+54
INV. IN 2174.0 (D7 -D6)
3.9'±
CURB INLET
F5
13+99
INV. OUT 2173.8 (D6 -D2)
5.1'±
CURB INLET
RIM 2177.6
D7
11+86
INV. OUT 2174.2 (D7D6)
3.3'±
CURB INLET
PROPOSED BIO -RETENTION CELL
(SEE DETAIL)
PROPOSED WATER CROSSING
(12" VERTICAL SEPARATION MIN.)
I PROPOSED PLUNGE POOL
(TYP)(SEE DETAIL)
JO
/ R
W
\ROA o
2180
-2190 \ \ \ \
\ /
A-----
PIPE TABLE
(SLOPES BASED ON 2D LENGTH TO INSIDE EDGES)
PIPE NAME
SIZE
LENGTH
SLOPE
MATERIAL
D1 -DO
18"
22'
4.2%
HDPE
D2 -D1
15"
198'
6.7%
HDPE
D3 -D2
15"
89'
7.9%
HDPE
D5 -D1
15"
80'
1.0%
HDPE
D6 -D2
18"
152'
0.9%
HDPE
D7 -D6
15"
29'
0.7%
HDPE
STRUCTURE TABLE
(INVERTS BASED ON 2D LENGTH TO INSIDE EDGES)
STRUCTURE
STATION
STRUCTURE DETAILS
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION
18"
70'
RIM 2154.2
HDPE
F2 -F1
FO
10+00
INV. IN 2152.5 (F1 -FO)
N/A
A
FLARED END SECTION
18"
1 90'
RIM 2165.0
HDPE
F4 -F3
18"
75'
INV. IN 2157.5 (F2 -F1)
HDPE
F5 -F4
F1
10+71
INV. IN 2157.8 (F7 -F1)
10.7'±
JUNCTION BOX
15"
65'
INV. OUT 2154.3 (F1 -FO)
HDPE
F7 -F1
15"
44'
RIM 2168.1
HDPE
F9 -F8
F2
11+30
INV. IN 2161.8 (F3 -F2)
6.4'±
CURB INLET
25'
2,766
INV. OUT 2161.7 (F2 -F1)
BUILDING 10
TYPE VII
38-7"
32,675
RIM 2169.4
CLUBHOUSE
CLUBHOUSE
F3
12+21
INV. IN 2162.9 (F4 -F3)
6.6'±
CURB INLET
INV. OUT 2162.8 (F3 -F2)
RIM 2168.1
F4
12+98
INV. IN 2163.9 (F5 -F4)
4.4'±
CURB INLET
INV. OUT 2163.7 (F4 -F3)
RIM 2170.0
F5
13+99
INV. IN 2165.0 (F6 -F5)
5.1'±
CURB INLET
INV. OUT 2164.9 (F5 -F4)
RIM 2171.8
F6
14+67
INV. OUT 2168.3 (F6 -F5)
3.6'±
CURB INLET
RIM 2164.2
F7
10+71
INV. OUT 2160.6 (F7 -F1)
3.6'±
CURB INLET
RIM 2144.7
F8
10+00
INV. IN 2142.0 (F9 -F8)
N/A
HEADWALL
RIM 2153.8
F9
10+39
INV. OUT 2142.6 (F9 -F8)
11.2'±
OUTLET STRUCTURE
i -7-x
I � �
��°o
/
2200
xX� A\
V A V A V A \ 218
0
PIPE TABLE
(SLOPES BASED ON 2D LENGTH TO INSIDE EDGES)
PIPE NAME
SIZE
LENGTH
SLOPE
MATERIAL
F1 -FO
18"
70'
2.5%
HDPE
F2 -F1
18"
55'
7.5%
HDPE
F3 -F2
18"
1 90'
1.1%
HDPE
F4 -F3
18"
75'
1.0%
HDPE
F5 -F4
15"
99'
1.0%
HDPE
F6 -F5
15"
65'
5.1%
HDPE
F7 -F1
15"
44'
6.4%
HDPE
F9 -F8
24"
36'
1.7%
HDPE
N/A
ROCK
L
7< J
\O�
0
0
RUN
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
26
DEVELOPMENT DATA
9634-87-3671:
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
TYNES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
9634-87-3103;
820 SHADES CREEK PARKWAY, SUITE 2300
TYPE 1
BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209
CONTACT:
INGRAM TYNES
521; 531;
[phone]
CIVIL ENGINEER:
CIVIL DESIGN CONCEPTS, P.A.
SHOALS ROAD
168 PATTON AVENUE
1593/356:
ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
CONTACT:
JASON FOSTER, P.E.
BUILDING 4
[phone]
SURVEYOR:
ED HOLMES AND ASSOCIATES
SETBACKS
300 RIDGEFIELD CT. SUITE 301
TYPE V
ASHEVILLE, NC 28806
CONTACT:
JOE KANE, P.L.S.
SIDES:
[phone]
ARCHITECT:
PUCCIANO & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
20'
3084 MERCER UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 110
TYPE VI
ATLANTA, GA 30341
CONTACT:
MARY PUCCIANO
BUILDING 8
[phone]
PROJECT DATA
32,675
PIN:
9634-87-3671:
9634-86-7547;
GFA
9634-87-3103;
9634-87-1028;
TYPE 1
9634-86-2977
20,631
ADDRESS:
521; 531;
533; 537;
38'-7"
539 LONG
SHOALS ROAD
DEED BOOK/PAGE:
1593/356:
358
SITE ACREAGE:
29.19 ACRES
BUILDING 4
ZONING:
R-2
6,001
SETBACKS
BUILDING 5
TYPE V
FRONT:
20'
36
SIDES:
10'
25'
REAR:
20'
BUILDING 7
DISTURBED AREA: 20.7 AC
PROPOSED UNITS 319 MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS
DENSITY SUMMARY:
ALLOWED: 12 UNITS/ACRE = 338 RESIDENTIAL UNITS
PROPOSED: 11.3 UNITS/ACRE
PARKING CALCULATIONS:
VEHICULAR:
REQUIRED SPACES: (1.75 SPACES PER UNIT)
REQUIRED PROVIDED
SPACES PROVIDED: 559 559
HANDICAPPED SPACES:
SPACES REQUIRED: 11 SPACES PROVIDED: 21
BUILDING DATA:
BUILDING
DESCRIPTION
HEIGHT
GFA
UNITS
BUILDING 1
TYPE 1
38'-4"
20,631
42
BUILDING 2
TYPE 11
38'-7"
38,156
70
BUILDING 3
TYPE 111
38'-11"
18,562
36
BUILDING 4
TYPE IV
26'-4"
6,001
10
BUILDING 5
TYPE V
39'-4"
13,959
36
BUILDING 6
TYPE VI
25'
2,766
2
BUILDING 7
TYPE VI
25'
2,766
2
BUILDING 8
TYPE VII
38-7"
32,675
56
BUILDING 9
TYPE VI
25'
2,766
2
BUILDING 10
TYPE VII
38-7"
32,675
56
CLUBHOUSE
CLUBHOUSE
26'-6"
6,491
IMPERVIOUS
CALCULATIONS:
IMPERVIOUS PERVIOUS
PRE -DEVELOPMENT: 1.50 ACRES (5%) 27.0 ACRES (95%)
POST -DEVELOPMENT: 10.0 ACRES (35%) 18.5 ACRES (65%)
SOIL TYPES: CuC, CuD, EvD2, TaC, TaD
HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP: B
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
NORTH
STORM DRAINAGE PLAN SOUTH
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
W
0 W CCD LQ
CD
0 L0
M W - L0
W N N N
H aLLI�D 7 LO
a N
N
N
V'T
Z N z
Z W eo ao
z
H oo ao
O J W ONVO
W J LU V W
d W Z
H> W x
co
Co 2 0 LL
W
N
O LL
Q a
Z Q a
M
z
m
az
0
LO
J
U)
CD
N m
z
0 (0 F_
z m �
U W
m
m �R:
mi
O m ~
n o V)
U
U O
m 00
00
CD \ \
0 0 0
N M
ofZ
m
♦^
V ,
o
100�
5
Q
U
G
0
Elf
0
z
ILLz
Z0
W
w
m
Q
o
M
z
m
az
0
0
F-
0
<
m
U
o
Cn
10-
Ch
z �'
J
0
a_ a
w
W
z
w
g
o
Q
Z Ir
w
o
J
Q
Of I-
w
>
w
0
12 Wco
0
Of
cc
w
>_
U
DRAWN BY:RWW
CDC PROJECT NO.: 11843
MSD PROJECT NO.: 2018207
COA WATER: WPFY-18-19-024
SHEET
160
C503

2180
2170
55LF-18"
HDPE @ 7.5%
70LF-18" HDPE ® 2.5%
2160—
/
Q
^
O
2150--
WWI
..
I I L�
U)00 -q-
+I r-� r-� Ln
-H
- U?
OLOLN
+CONN
CV
+I`n
W0� ~
ONN
NZ Z ZO
OOf
D
2140-o
0
a(z z z
0'�O�
WcnF-Z
2130-
2120
0
0
0
0
0
65LF-15" HDPE ® 5.1%
75LF-18" HDPE ® 1.0% ---
99LF-15" H PE ® 1.0 0
90LF-18" HDPE
LW
W I
^ I Ln
(.0
LL
^
LL-
LO
LIn O
04 L� M 0 L6LLi I `-' 0) O CO N
I LNi .Wi o0 CP M C N
W CP N �-I O LL LO + � ~
v� +IN � CO CN �NZO
N +COQ W
0�C0N r�+cON W�NZ a_V0ZZ
n00Cy W C14 Z
04 LL- NZ O 0QCQ� >;
0_�NZ O 0HO> > 0 HZ Z
OHO» CL(nHZ Z
CLNF- Z z
0
0
N
STORM LINE F
0
0
•e
:f
170
.•
170
Ln
W
I
--2160
Cd
-H�2
I -00N
(O
+
-- LL
N D
O
QQO�
W N F-- Z
-2150
2140
r -
130
120
W CW CLO CA COUj 0 LO
M CO W N� 9 H co a N
N
a Z N N N z a V
PROPOSED 6" DIP WATER LINE Z
BOTTOM = 2150.15± 0d aN wUT
CM04
CC
2160— 2160 LU >LU
PROPOSED 8" DIP SEWER LINE Uj
¢ (LCO 0LL ~ = LLLL
BOTTOM = 2150.75± a
Cm
— 3
0
2150— 2150 E
0
a y
M
a
V1
+^+ L
C N
4)
2170 2170 2140- 2140 V >
44LF-15" HDPE 0 6.4% •> O 3
Ono 5
216 2160 213 2130
O \
® "CLASS RCP .3%
134LF-3 ^
_9
I 00
T
0 N
I U
o r
2150- j 2150 v 212 - -2120 w
N r�tD N
o Z
pry -H (2 + h2 W
Cn 00 NN C14
�NV
-- OLO LO N -- L,L0+0� C111OCL
QWO fA
_ _ 0 CL W
+CONN C -- �Z m
WONZZZ C> Z
0- .. O m(n�Z
2140-0 0 > > > 2140 2110-- --2110
m
af ' n' m
o
2130— 2130 2100— 2100 J
O r, o o LO < Ld
o 't o oCn
0 0 0 + + C�
W m Z
(n =) Z
C7 N �_ O_
_ ~
Z 0
0_ w
STORM NE F7—F1 STORM LINE G N �ow
��
Cn
U O
m 00
27LF-15" HDPE ® 0.9%
150 221'0 2210
33LF-12" EXISTING CMP @ 6.0%
29LF-12" EXISTING CMP @ 1.07.
140
130
2120-CL(n�Z --2120
2110 2110
O o o O m
o O o o c0
STORM LINE H
n
2200— 220C
� X
^ D O W
00 x
2190— w o ^ w 2190
X X
W X N
WW I W
v O CP
(T
.�00 v00 MN
00
0)
OM(N r,-:- .-NZ
N z-:.-NZ
W O+ N W p+ ON N d
Z O N Z O z
21800�0>; 0aCL>; — 2180
N H z z X N o z z
2170— 2170
o r-
0 0
O o
BMP B OUTLET
2170
52LF-30" CLASS V RCP ® 1.1%
2160—
-2170 2170
17LF-8" CMP @ 13.5%
��2160
t-3
2150
^ O
I ?
N � X
PROPOSED PIPE TO BELi
INBEDDED 1 FOOT r -0o -Hr,: �2
2140— r- ,`f o `r N 2140
00't=; +(0 H
O+LON ONZ O
�ONZ Cl -
Of HOZ Z
�- -
af�o>
a_V,�Z
2130- 2130
o
o
0 0
STORM LINE J
NOTE:
THE PIPE LENGTHS, SLOPES, AND INVERTS SHOWN
IN THE ABOVE PROFILES ARE BASED ON A 2D
LENGTH AND MEASURED FROM INSIDE WALL TO
INSIDE WALL OF STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR
SHALL VERIFY ALL INVERTS AND LINE LENGTHS
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
STORM PROFILES
0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft. (H)
0 4 8 16
"O!!!�
1 inch = 8 ft. (V)
\W
N r1) M O
O O O
N r7 O
Z
Z
o
Q LLL . �
O
U
♦) o
v5, �
G Q
0
0
m
0
z
L ~
z
Z
W W
m
0 0
z
m
m
aZ
O
Q
a 0_
O
d
0_
O
O
0 a
O z
L,W
Cn W
LL
0
M o
LL. J
o w
m >
w w
D
W
� w
O
Cn
DRAWN BY: RWW
CDC PROJECT NO.: 11843
MSD PROJECT NO.: 2018207
COA WATER: WPFY-18-19-024
SHEET
C507

IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation U.S. Fish&Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that
follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional
information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section. ,
I -\ T-%
Location
Buncombe County, North Carolina
.l
Local office
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
[phone]
18 [phone]
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/countyfr.html

Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project
level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the
project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site-specific and project -
specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only
be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC
(see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review„lease return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:0 ��`
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST
Listed species
1 and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information.
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:

Mammals
NAME STATUS
Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2657
Gray Bat Myotis grisescens Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6329
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Clams
NAME STATUS
Appalachian Elktoe Alasmidonta raveneliana Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside
the critical habitat. 3
https://ecos.fws. s ovg/ecp/species/5039
Arachnids
NAME fn CI)O STATUS
Spruce -fir Moss Spider Microhexura montivaga Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside
the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4801
. .
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Blue Ridge Goldenrod Solidago spithamaea Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5821
Bunched Arrowhead Sagittaria fasciculate Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1720
Mountain Sweet Pitcher -plant Sarracenia rubra ssp. jonesii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4283

Spreading Avens Geum radiatum Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6854
Virginia Spiraea Spiraea virginiana Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1728
Lichens
NAME STATUS
Rock Gnome Lichen Gymnoderma lineare Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3933
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed alon wi the endangered
species themselves.
�'%Oro
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birdS9111., G
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act
1 and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf

The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E -bird data mapping tool (Tip:
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project
area.
NAME BREEDING SENFA
..................................................................
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
...........................................................................................
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
.....................................................................................
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
.......................................................................
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
............................................................................................
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
.......................................................................
WHICH IS AVERY LIBERAL
.....................................................................
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
...................................................................................
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS
.............................................................................................
ITS ENTIRE RANGE. "BREEDS
..........................................................................
ELSEWHERE" INDICATES THAT THE
.............................................................................................
BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY BREED IN
..........................................................................................
0YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
.
Bobolink Doli onyx yzivorus Breeds May 20 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Canada Warbler Cardellina canadensis
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Northern Saw -whet Owl Aegolius acadicus acadicus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Breeds May 20 to Aug 10
Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
Breeds Marl to Jul 31

Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Yellow -bellied Sapsucker sphyrapicus varius Breeds May 10 to Jul 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8792
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any
location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur
in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur
and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird
species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCCI and other species that
may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried
and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects,
and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle
(Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the.E-bird Explore Data Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring
in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.

How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-
round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if
you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If
a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is
indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts
and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle
Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in
your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in
my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km
grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,

and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize
potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation
measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to
migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns. \ 14
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS ATTHIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION
- 0
el
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update
our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual
extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
FRESHWATER POND
PUBHh
RIVERINE
RSUBH
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
Data limitations

The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information
on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery.
Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the
use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland
boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded fro. the�inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the
geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities
involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or
local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such
activities.

T OF THE
`���� U.S. DEU S. GEOLOGIICAL SURV YERIOR
science for a changing world
82°37'30"
3929000n
39:
39:
a
27'3C
39•
25'
39•
39•
39,
39•
e
39•
e
391
620 0(
FEE
0
391
391
35°22'30'
82°37'30"
Produced by the United States Geological Survey
North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and
1 000 -meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 17S
10 000 -foot ticks: North Carolina Coordinate System of 1983
This map is not a legal document. Boundaries may be
generalized for this map scale. Private lands within government
reservations may not be shown. Obtain permission before
entering private lands.
Imagery .............................................NAIP, October 2014
Roads ................................ U.S. Census Bureau, 2015 - 2016
Roads within US Forest Service Lands.............FSTopo Data
with limited Forest Service updates, 2012 - 2016
Names...............................................................GNIS, 2016
Hydrography ....................National Hydrography Dataset, 2014
Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2008
Boundaries ............ Multiple sources; see metadata file 1972 - 2016
Wetlands ......... FWS National Wetlands Inventory 1977 - 2014
The National Map
E. USTop o�5
35' 32'30"
SKYLAND QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA
7.5 -MINUTE SERIES
82°30'
°^^ 35°30'
N.
6° 31"
116 MILS
0° 54'
16 MILS
UTM GRID AND 2016 MAGNETIC NORTH
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
U.S. National Grid
100,000-m Square ID
LV
r7i-o�i
" 35,
SCALE 1:24 000
1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2
1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000
1 0.5 0 1
MILES
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
FEET
CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET
NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
This map was produced to conform with the
National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.
A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.19
32'30"
NORTH
CAROLIN
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
1 Enka
1 2 3 2 Asheville
3 Oteen
4 5 4 Dunsmore Mountain
5 Fruitland
6 Pisgah Forest
6 7 8 7 Horse Shoe
8 Hendersonville
ADJOINING QUADRANGLES
29
50000
-ET
27
26
27'30"
'24
'23
'22
'21
N-1
'20
'19
'18
'17
)I 600OMN
35°22'30"
82°30'
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
Expressway Local Connector
N
Secondary Hwy Local Road
co
Ramp 4WD
TETTMN
• Interstate Route US Route O State Route
^ Y
M V
FS Primary Route O FS Passenger
0 FS High
N
X
Route
Clearance Route
— U)
O (D
Check with local Forest Service unit
co Cn
for current travel conditions and restrictions.
Z)
v
CIO O
U-
SKYLAND, NC
za
2016
—ZZ