310087_Compliance Inspection_20180827

ivision of Water Resources
=jaci�ftyr �j j 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: C,,ompliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: /Rouutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: .30 Departure Time: pd U County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: //
Facility Contact: 1i Axzz Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Laver Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Laver Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish J' Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean ?900 3JU Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish I Lavers I Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boar, Pullets Beef Brood Covy
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts y,�
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 1`"^ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page i of 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: $ 2 7
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Pq7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 2 S
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes P] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) !!
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 5,{0�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ l3iJ
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13.Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes E71 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [,0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes S ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [,B No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reguired Records& Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Z NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - 02 Dateotlns ection: ,z
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [tfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate boxes)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [—] Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 2§No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA JgNE
❑Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 'JEJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name: At Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015