310078_Compliance Inspection_20180629

'tj I I V\S j ;,:
Q111vision of Water Resources
Facility Number —J - 7 S' 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: QrCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: �^oa F Arrival Time: (r(( Departure Time:l/IL1�S /'f�lCounty: 1ti1� Region: tL
Farm Name: `7• l7✓C�er�i �C� Z Owner Email:
Owner Name: s� / /a d �tf+M f !� LL Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
nn
Facility Contact: ll Kf/`Wt Z Title: Phone{{:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: ffi
Certified Operator: /y 1•'ti C /x ri1e/ Certification Number: D S�
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I JLayer I I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Z Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Ca aci Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-La ers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other Turke Poults
Other Other
Dischar¢es and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [Ejjblo'❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No [3-N7V ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [,]PI1�❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [s]NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [3-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Blio ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 7 4�- Date of Inspection: /U<✓
Waste Collection&Treatment
4!Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No Q-N_A__❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): Z t Z Z
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 2<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes L2-I10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes U>o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 0'fro__ ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN>10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptabblnle Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): c� ry-t 4—P
13. Soil Type(s): v ,
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 2�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes U3 o. ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [E]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ YesFTN-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists []Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes D<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facill Number: Date of Inspection: ( 7
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E] W ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [EL.No' ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 0-9-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Q-N-5 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Q.Nn ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [] o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes r7 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes M "o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑moo ❑ NA ❑ NE
omments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
e drawinp of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
l-.ai6Pv+itwx U ' t y
Z a. K 3 z Lfo
oto-
Reviewer/InspectorName: Rik DOVILID Phone: L4033`3M
c ry
Reviewer/InspectorSignature: Date: �C
Page 3 of 3 21412015