The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About310078_Structure Evaluation_20181003 Division of Water Resources / =acili�Number �.?�' - o Division of Soil and Water Conservation ✓ ��, O Other Agency Type of Visit: O Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review MItructure Evaluation O Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: O Routine O Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral O Emergency O Othern''''''0 Denied Access �1 Date of Visit: 0 3 i Arrival Time:® Departure Time:® County: �J yy I n Region: f V� Farm Name: V C rOdA ry / Owner Email: T Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: !,,Title: Phone: OnsiteRepresentative: UtiYT13 Bwr1n Integrator: Certified Operator: Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish I ILayer I I Dain Co" Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I I Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder 'Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder Roars Pullets Beef Brood Cow Turkeys Other Turkey Poults 01 h er Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(if yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: Waste Collection&Treatment 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? [—] Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [—] No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: 2. Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): Observed Freeboard(in): z3 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [ NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA U�NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) �/ 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes E] No ❑ NA ONE maintenance or improvement? v Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [ YNE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA PfNE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12.Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA *E 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA *E 16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ( NE acres determination? 17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 1 7d NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA fpI1NE Required Records& Documents 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE 20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NANE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA *E ❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code ❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA KNE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NANE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NAINE Other Issues " 28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 1 �/vE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? �V 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) ��°° 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 1 1p NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 7T� 32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA to tvE 33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA [—] NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary). a h rah F i G dotnh� tturrC 5X4A , 1 2 L27 �l Ain (Q vYw r.b� 34 23 4 1eQar�S Urere D�vUi �a�lz /, pnvi'� NA"11 �olius dr,'►Cm 4Mr�h� ►Vq ciVm — �UQX � Reviewer/Inspector Name: �"r `D (� I � �^c U Phone: 11 Q,8 Lq(p—t J a 1 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: __= Date: (A 3 Page 3 of 3 21412015