310066_Compliance Inspection_20180829

s - .. v (
CF Division of Water Resources
Facility Number T i (0 6 O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: C�o/mp Hance Inspection Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: I,JRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access'
Date of Visit: 110. Arrival Time:� Departure Time: <� County: Ii Region:O iL
U Farm Name: the r ( . one- F0.'rm /J Owner Email:
Owner Name: C h Q w)pS [�, k )W a nb Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: t!i, { 1`G Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 1 t y Integrator: ►/' 19— Sot 6&IeL2
Certified Operator: C h aa '.� S E eJ w&A Jj Certification Number: Z q 2 t7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I iLayer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I lNon-Layer I I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish S'2 ao0 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Ca acity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Roars Pullets IlBeefBroodCow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [✓]'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [2"'NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 5 NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes � ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes D40 ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? [—] Yes ❑ No IA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): �31
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Eg'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 19"o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 13<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes L IS"o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [R o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes t No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Wi dow ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): � q /�j
13. Soil Type(s): / GO ✓q
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [Li14o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Eg,4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Ej jXo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes L 4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ER o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes [eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and I"Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facifity Number: III Date of Inspection:
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes B<O ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes l io ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes R20<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q-Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes l_ lfo� ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 1 : o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
[�alibrct=Cl`u✓\ 7-�-'�-- i7j ��.cQ�� 5't��v�Y — i1 "��- i7
i o 3.
r I� sL la-&4 h&^W
ot10- 6 1$ 5i
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1 l Phone:q -
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/4 Ol5