820375_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULI NA
Department of Environmental Qual

Facility Number d Date of visit: Time: 8 = 3d
rO Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: 'r �ot� /// ,J • S X County: 5 •�.•-� d.�a�i
Owner flame: Pbone No: ! o) SSD - .2 74
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: U OF, IJ.i L i Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: , M,4-- V - 9rcw N
Certified Operator: 6"'d Jit�,2', kc 3 Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm -
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �' o Longitude
- Desi Current =. `Des' n Current.'
€� v
I 'CurEent
_
Snrne :. Capacity .:Population - .. Ponlfry_ __ - acrtr =P ulation .- _'.Cattle . _ . Cii achy= Pv oiwn
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ La er Dairy
® Feeder to Finish 1.2 q4 ;= ❑Non -Layer '. PO Non -Dairy I
__.. W -
= ® Farrow to Wean 1600
- [] Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish _ - Total De*10:.Gapacrt3
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars - Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ` ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area
❑ 5 rav Field Area
_Holding Poads-/ Solid'Traps [] No Liquid Waste Management System
i - _
Discharges 8 Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation)
❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Laaoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State:' (If yes. notif}, DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
W /A
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
2_ Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes [a No
Waste Collection S- Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes Pfl No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .5 Fi uy}�s r'
Freeboard (inches): q0 If f If
05/03/01 Continued

Facility Number: 3.1
Date of inspection lata
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or envirotumental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need tnaintenancehmprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancerimprovement?
9_ Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste A hication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
1 I . Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
CK Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes [$ No
❑ Yes 13No
12. Crop type . ger .�. IAa3 I W i , 5 G .. _
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWN P)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
I.
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes © No
❑ Yes B No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
M Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 1P No
❑ Yes [Z No
/x- : "ftY- X-� _ - y,-�d
- eir .-` ti . - .. �-
h . �w,�-
=UseV� af,to;betl ( addido� PgpesnrylyFeld'copy 0 Final Notts
w�
_ _.._.; pia
0 Se+w I a1eov. 6 -Li . L, .tl lac 61 Mr. y6u,q .
a
A�^t f 3 f`C+ bt b:-o;.�gi'f� ih Gra. iv.-.��a��Cci� �.-. $hc.S'c �iYScy• �'• !!
S� s �� a
Ci ras w Ll �o ila w w1,
��,..a�.� CxCAcK, P1.��� 10.cjDbJU. �I�RlG rGM+-O
✓G Q.►.O'�-
� � � � o� � o -�r k1� �.� �.."'z+l,i i ,,.,• 3 tie Ir. r c. r, til b w � �.-�
�VL 1 c
TG � PIc1GG�n�o�S �,rti t'.h.� �.ri^�5�: r.c� la�a�u . Lt iy ynC�Gar 0..3 f'o
9 A- !,%-I jA_ G C'
w� G
Reier rName
Reieerinspector $gnatnre: Date:A r/
12112103 Consinued

Facility Number: &I _37 Date of Inspection
IZ uired Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WLJP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 91 No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) Yes No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfmspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (if no, skip questions 31-35) Yes ❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ® No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes ® No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes j No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
No violations or deficiencies were netted during *is visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
�.ln-Nr»i'"Lr }._:_�__..z�.�
..,s... t.ILa-i�.u. t'.fY. v'✓•'w.�u�== �'v:-+r.»Se..._"$'q"MF}`� r. _— ___�. Y^�.'c�"ElC._r.ew.n:A�v, Jis:�i ..itis. m�^�_^`
T
12/12/U3

4
Permit Number
Far-�:n Nark
Acictress
AP Regional Supervisor
Original Issue Date
Engineer Cert. Date
1-51 ::ager's Nara
Maiager'sRPhon
Rig: L-
R, Contac
e��cna��Pf�or
Import Date
rescinded
A
n egionts r nt C t,

Type of Visit qi Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: L
Facility Number �J
10 Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered
.Farm Name: _ &5L__Lc_ � i tfr_'Dau ;k Pn,,% nq
Owner Name: -0c,
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: _566 910"C Tit]e:
Onsite Representative: 3' + "� m—, y
Certified Operator: cr kAo �s It 5
Location of Farm:
3 Q7 42 Time:
Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County: /mq/7 J FPO
Phone No: Cc1lc !-wo—E'�7'L
Phone No:
Integrator: iMr ,
Operator Certification Number:
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �' �� �" Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design ; . Current .:
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity
Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ID La er 10 Dairy
19 Feeder to Finisht n -La er ❑ Non -Dai
Farrow to Wean _.-
y D)
El Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
`
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
.- .......... .
'
Number of Lagoons Q, ❑ Subsurface Drains Present IFO Lagoon Area ❑
Spray Feld Area
- --
1 olding Pondst/ Solid Traps �i ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System R; e
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑Yes 0 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ LaQoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ yes (] No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? El Spillway
❑ Yes LIN
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05/03/01
Continued

Facility Number: — ��7$ Date of Inspection AU07 a.Z
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? yes [� No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes tlu No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes�No
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ElPAN ElHydraulic Overload ❑ Yes M No
12. Crop type _'Rermja ( Hath M-4
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes [�fNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes M No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes M No
Re aired Recrds & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ElYes 1 No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes [� No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes 10 No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes [A No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes U3 No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 03 No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Field Covy ❑ Final Notes
— keg *;z k,;li %e-
e,noeS 4--
v'1!
cL s-&, -alone
(Y1,4u,, _rJJ jjc[iiusc o
POO C 6,f+"I" S7"
GlAJ
\
40l�Tiri4�c ¢�-}eh S O(1 veo�eTutill�
C0�1 Pr i►&
MmIL.+Nt', IQrtj ,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
05/03/01
Date:
U
Continued

Facility Number: $ — $17j Date of Inspection a J7 02
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes (� No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or {�
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes Lr= No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes WNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
05/03/01

Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit A Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
0 Permitted 13 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: -------------------------
Farm
--- -.---- -farm Name: � ......................................................
Owner Name: ...........77 C 411- C Phone No:---L.L.�G .............................................
.......r..............................................................................................
Facility Contact: ..... l._. ... l...U.w" .............Title: Phone No:................................................
Mailing Address /� � L� �� 1���✓�b-✓ (r �, .�Q I���
Onsite Representative:... .............................................. Integrator:.........- --•----. .�......--•------
Certified Operator:......,, / ................................................. ................ Operator Certification Number: ,•••,•,•,••,••,,,,,•,•
.
Location of Farm:
A,
I -W
❑
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �� �� ��• Longitude �'`
Design Current
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
11771 Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
JEJ Other
11 Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
Gilts
❑ BoarsTotal
SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Safid No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Wo
Dischar.-e originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance nnan-made? ❑ Yes j No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes t9No
c- If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes PNo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �( No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
01MI/01 Continued

Facility Number: — 17S—
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection 0
4- Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 'IN No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..............................
Frceboard (inches): ............. Z ........................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes gNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? E] Yes � No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? D Yes ;iWo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes/119No
9- Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes )9No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 'gNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes Wo
12. Crop type ���
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes I No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes IN No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes RNo
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes CR No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
17. Are rock outcrops present?
18- Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary?
E] On-site ❑Off-site -
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes R No
QX"_4g�No 4)/,�
❑ Unknown -fl NollA
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
25- Did Reviewerhnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
XYes ❑ No
❑ Yes XFNo
❑ Yes j$No
❑ Yes P[ No
❑ Yes .®`No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes CR No
`Yes El No
/❑_Yes fR No
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below )�R Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes ERNo
01/01/0l Continued

Facility Number: Z _ 7 Date of Inspection
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
Printed on: 1/4/2001
❑ Yes ex No
❑ Yes jS No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? JRYes ❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to queshba #)Explain any YES a vers andlor any recommendations or any oth re comments ;�
Viii'd of facility to better explain;situat�brts (dse,addtttonal pages as necessary) r
r--,. Field Cop ❑Final Notes
�.tt.•� i..a.� �dt�G✓• • C'.r.E�.3 ¢-.i �^a�.�Cit<.d�
�...✓� J7
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
01/01/01

0 Division of Water Quality _ -
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation "
Q Other -Agency
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ® Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit:Time: I== Printed on: 7/21/2000
Q Not O erational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: .A41'. `.a�� .e. ,.Sam`' . ....................... County: .�.a .;
.... ....... I............ .....................
.... ........ ..........
� / r
Owner Name: �%%r � 1`"!��.-�� C �%C/ �G.... ............. Phone No: ��...�,�� ................................
Facility Contact: ...............................25;/4. �1"� ..Title: ........ ' / ... Phone No: ..................................................
Mailing Address: ... ... f `..... O,J� �� A � .���............................ .........................
.....................................
Onsite Representative:....... ...i`��Yl.'c.�:�T"� .......................... Intcgrator:.................. f.:".. ..... . .......................
Certified Operator:,,.,,,,,-, . Operator Operator Certification Number: ........................................
........................................ /.............................................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 1 -- Longitude • C74
064
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer I ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Layer I JE1 Non -Dairy
19 Farrow to Wean CefO �6p�
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present❑ Lag, -n Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes allo
Discharoc originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance; man-made"? ❑Yes Jallo
h. if discharYe is observed, did it reach Water of the State:' (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If dischar�,e is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ,53'No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ,®"No
3- Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes IN No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway A'Yes ❑ No
Siructuure I Structure 2 Structure ; Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier : ............../O.
Freeboard (inches):
5100 Continued on back

Facility Number: — 37"" Date of Inspection E:== Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes �M No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
[:]Yes KNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes �No
$_ Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes jNwo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
'
elevation markings?
❑ Yes�No
�`
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes )Q—No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes �1Vo
I2. Crop type
t4
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes o
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes N'No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ON
C) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ANo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes X No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes XNo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate ol'Coverage & General Permit readily available?Yes
ElNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes 9 No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
XYes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes j No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes WNo
22_ Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) XNo
! !' �Kwes
23_ Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? rC❑Yes VNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ONo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes bTNo
•yiolatid6s ;o1- def ciencies •were noted• dialing this visit; - Vot will deceive {io; fui•th
rorresponden' ce. a�otit this visit
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
/ z
yf IX /,4��d �J�""d.F! i�.E i���.:C�- f/� =J /S� ,rD a• i s4'�' f�G :y/�/.
"7, f/y'c�/ cP�Jr s' • �.rcii r,+ /J ���r� s.�►�t 711,u �i tel/ .s�.���/��•�-�,�///_ �.�a.�,�%� 97,.
AL
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: __x- Date: ������ 5100

Facility Number: �Z —�T Date of Inspection !/Zdoa Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or holow IN
Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours`? ❑ Yes FtNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ®"No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) Cl Yes M'No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? Yes ❑ No
AdditionaLCommentsand/orDrawings:-
AL
5/00

Farm Name• R�•w. County:....-�!............................ ......................
................................ 4 ..- a ..--.... S,� ..... .
Owner Name......... yw' ..."or. .If!!1.------ ---- Phone No:
Facilitv Contact: ......-r.1.. .....1. .........Title: ....... Phone No: ...............................................
Mailing Address: /l!�91 �p vl .. ..../..1.. .. ......r�Q...7 .........................
Onsite Representative: ...... IVAUIA-A-�11.kl.. ........ Integrator: � ....................
Certified Operator: �/•�.� Operator Certification Number: %¢b �0.......... .,,.,,•.,,,,
......................................................................... ....... .
Location of Farm:
...................................................................................................................•---...............................................................--..----.---....---•................................................................
Latitude • 6 « Longitude • 6 "
Design Current - Design Current _. Design Current
- '-Swine . _Ca BClty Population Poultry - --- Vnxinrity `piinitilatinn. Cattle- Canneity Pnmilation
❑Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
10 Farrow to Wean BOO 1,e',oQ
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts.
❑ Boars
Discharses At Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Dischargc originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made"
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: f
.2
Freeboard(inches): R• ............................................................................................................................................... ..
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes 19 No
[]Yes 29 No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes % No
Structure 6
...............................
❑ Yes P No
Continued on back

Facility Number: VZ — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
0
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenabce/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
0
RNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
IgNo
❑ Yes
& No
❑ Yes
RNo
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15_ Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Rec uir-ed Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, d 1jy , maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes X No
9 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes $d No
❑ Yes ;KNo
❑ Yes P9 No
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Wi ioiatioris:oe. deficiencies �+4ere ppoted- dikfing this.visiL • Yo4 :will-feeeive riti t'utther - : - :
corres oridence: about th& :visit_ : : . . .. . ......:..:... :.: .
Comments -(refer. to_question #)XExplatnany YES severs and/or,aiiy recoinmertd ons or'any other comments
Use of facility to°better. explai4 sttua#>ons (use addii�tional=pages as; necessary) - W =
!"i�4f �L �C�+" G!%�.ii[s/' �rl� /[M 01«S.,r (w/•4f d�i���i� �D
Reviewer/Inspector Name_ _
O -�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:Date: /Z /
3/23/99

Facility Number: 2 —?7 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes JK No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes M No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan bladc(s), inoperable shutters, etc_) ❑ Yes KNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 9 No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? A�j ONo
3/23/99

�� 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation Other Agency
Y G�V r
Division of Water Quality *01 3
r Routine 0 Com0aint O Follow-up of DIVQ inspection Q Follow-upof DS1VC review 0 Other
Facility Number
Date of inspection /z J
Z
Time of Inspection d r3 6 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered ® Certified 0 Applied for Permit ® Permitted JE3]Sot Opera Date Last Operated:.. ...................
Farm Name: A
..ofl�f,C Countr'f"�
.€...._H�.r ............................... .... ...........
Owner Name:.........�u�..... �...' Phane No: �3, 5.—...c��2
... ......................
...............................
Facility Contact: �,'l .�% . Title• Phone Na: ...................................................
Mailing Address: ......... fl�lr..�f�!cid ,C.ci.�9�.......---.. /Ca /1 ..C...•Z3Z........ ............... .......
Onsite Representative:..._...r ......m...1�r� Integrator:...... % .. . , ....................
e
Certified Operator ;..... /-..!--�%� �i, .__. Operator Certification Number;....1�� y.................,...
..................... a
Location of Farm:
e...... ...._...... ..................... ........... ........................................ ------ '*
Latitude �' 0` �r� Longitude �• �� ���
W
f Design .. Cpri ent
Design Current
_ ' . 'Design Current r
Somme' Cdpacity- Population`
Poultry
Gapaeity Population
Cattle - Capacity Popdh tion,
v
❑ Wean to Feeder
ID Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ 1\Ton-Layer
„ 10 Non -Dairy[
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
JE1 Other
❑ Farrow to Finish 1
z
„T©tat Design CapaCity�
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
.
y wT46 1 SSLW--
` .. ` ___; ... k.' n..
Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management S
Y�
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 19 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes WNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a_ If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes E( No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes )TNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ANo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes gNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes XNo
maintenancelimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 41-9-INo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes XNo
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Number: •— 3
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be property closed?
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds, Flush fits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes N No
Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): ..............:�.t.N.............................................
.........................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes , No
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes j No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
I3. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes Pq No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes 1KNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of 1the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ....�/� � 1..^ .................... ..................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ;9 No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes P No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes X No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes O No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes [WNo
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewinspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes ZIP No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
JR] Yes ❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes )� No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes 10 No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes P No
1vo.Vlolatlons" :or deiic neles were Muted (wring this visit., You:viri receive n'Airther'
. correspiknde O about -this'.visit Visit,.
C' is (defer to quests€ u 1; } Explain any YES answers an 'or'recommeudiftions4f,any�nther comnnnents, : g,
z
`Ings
tBiwli€tg5 ttf fihty to betlereplanr"sttuatlattse additions! as scary>� t
--n,,,m. •'� ''�.. 3> .;;, n . '�` '. 'r t u � kn . , r°,6�a�'F .. .. ,x..r r.e.,ac � , . • .
•... .. .�...x ';;�a '� m<�p r "�E ..+,.. ,_--
..`ZrTlek'! Y�TL LUfI ��p�Csll/O.d /1/�PU b� �.aii.✓�� �✓lti��d.L
fkc.� �clU✓ p.✓f G/�,6,E- /,� p.i 7f.�iP Z �,c,4- zm 4x/-
7/25/97
m z�09
Reviewer/Inspector Name
_ .. . .... u .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �i•~� Date: (�

�.DSWC A11ZImalFeedlat Operation Reiew
-
r
Sao- � .,.,� � „ ` `�.. � • � �,. £ .re ,�. -� .r' e � -- �,.,+Y' x ; � r., ,��. � `�.,� �` `�-� s+
[] DWQ A
�
k �t nimal Feedlot Operiation�Site inspection
..x,. <,,,�` F,.,,�a. s¢.. �k i.. ��Garx�.. � �t4m• ,g : � 2 vim,? � �.,s x
O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ ins ecdon O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection 7
� 37
Time of Inspection dpi 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: '"" --egistered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:I.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted I or Inspection includes travel and processin
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: ,_.... -W.._.__.... __.... .... _ _. _... ......_ ....._ ..... .......................
Farm Name:........ a—S _�.... County: _ .... ._
Land Owner Name: a Phone Na: �..-•--... _. _ .. r..... _
Facility Conctactri �-. ! 'L- r Title: -- Phone No:.. ._ .... _... ......... _ .....
Mailing Address: .......... .....-
Onsite Representative: .
p ..�. �.._......__......_.......�_........------..--- Integrator: .... .. _ �..._.............w..........._._...._....
Certified Operator:.. ! :...__... ., Operator Certification Number: >�4
Location of Farm: �p,l , fe st' rQc.,Z Al r' s,� L 2l � mac- ,scly�r7 5"//, •✓T�- -Sp /'�
Latitude 0 9 =C Longitude • 6 Liu
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
„� £d f �.«s�. ria '° ��Current �` g sr� .+ ��DeS! � Carrent x ���t.•.� ��6eek, x ham. ��- ��r
SWY� 4'C8F8CI %Pn Ulatlan ,{ <, Ca BCItVaPO Rlfltlon h �C8�8CI =SPO ulkio'n
.� Cattle
can to Feeder : ❑ La £i ❑ D '
' ❑Feeder to Finish � Non -La er '` ❑Non -Da'
Y? �M
Farrow to Wean z+aw
Farrow to Feeder Total Design�Capaci[yM.
�
Farrow to Finishct'3 sst 1 s�w�
w. $/5.f Total SSLW;
❑Other T �'Kr�s y- '��s t'�`,�# ar' :s t r,�,x ",�i �' '=fit �5
zv = Via•
Number of Lagoons /-Holding Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present
�v; °` 3� £ ❑Lagoon Area Spray Field Aires �.
f
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30197 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes lO
❑ Yes ago—
[]Yes
No
❑Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑Yes ❑N1No�o`
❑ Yes , KO
[3 Yes 940
❑ Yes 2<0
Continued on back

Facility Number:.-�
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structure La us and/or HoldingPonds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): SSttru lure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If-any-efquestions 9-13 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes 0<0
❑ Yes �Q_KO' ld
❑ Yes 'No
❑ Yes ['lo
Structure 5 Structure 6
VLale Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of Wfff, or runof�entng Aws of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type _ .................—........ .....
_-
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
F aciliti
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance -of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes M'<o
❑ No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes U40
❑ Yes
�n IA-
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Ll? r10
To
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
,�o
Ly " O
❑ Yes
orgo'
❑ Yes ❑ No /I/4-
❑ Yes
.pr /V �i9-
❑ Yes OIWO'
Comments„{refer toquestion t 'Explatn any YES answers and/or` any recommendations nr any other_commetits
Use drawings. of facihty to fetter exptain situations. (use a�honal pages as necessary). �.�r �k � �` �3
l z_a� ILS
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30197