820072_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

RECEIVED
DEQIDWR
Water Resources
Environmental Quality
ADJ Farms, Inc
ADJ Hog Farm 3-5
1366 Bass Lake Rd
Roseboro, NC 28382
Dear ADJ Farms, Inc:
JUL 18 2017
WQROS
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
July 12, 2017
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS820072
ADJ Hog Farm 3-5
Animal Waste Management System
Sampson County
The Division of Water Resources (Division) received your sludge survey information on July 5,
2017. With the survey results, you requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement for
the lagoon #1 at ADJ Hog Farm 3-5 facility. Due to the amounts of treatment volume available,
the Division agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until December 31, 2020.
The next sludge survey for the lagoon # 1 at ADJ Hog Farm 3-5 facility should be performed
before December 311, 2020. Please call me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Program
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Permit File AWS820072
- r--Nothing Ccampares'r,, -
Stale of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
1636 Mail Service Center � Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E_ Diractor
Division of Water Quality
December 1, 2006
RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED ER EMAIL W-MM-0 CEIVF1)Wayne Cannady EC
A.D.J. Hog Farm 3-5
am
1366 Bass Lake Rd�(IILC%E
Roseboro, NC 28382
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring NPDES General Permit
Dear Pennittee:
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation NPDES General Permits, which expire on
July 1, 2007. Due to changes in federal rules, facilities that do not discharge nor propose to discharge may choose whether or not to
retain coverage under an NPDES General Permit. Copies of the draft animal waste operation NPDES general permits and the State
Non -Discharge General Permits are available at hqp://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/gps/afou/downloads.htm or by writing or calling:
NCDENR — DWQ Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
In order to assure your continued coverage under one of these two types of general permits, you must submit an application for permit
coverage to the Division. Enclosed_Vou will find a `Request for Certificate of Coverage Facility Currently Covered by an Expiring
NPDES General Permit.' The application form must be completed and returned by January 2, 2007. Please note, you must include
two (2) copies of your most recent Waste Utilization Plan with the application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to 525,000 per day.
If you have any, questions about the draft general permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel free to contact the
Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at 919-733-3221.
Sincerely,
r
Ted L. Bush, Jr., Chief
Aquifer Protection Section
Enclosures
cc (w/o enclosures): Sampson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files - 820072
Coharie Farms
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncw E uali .or Location: 272E Capital Boulevard
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmat we Action Employer- 50% Recycied110% Post Consumer Paper
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone:
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1:
Fax 2:
Customer Service:
NotthCarolina
(919) Nr kr ll-11
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]

4
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor. Secretary
January 15, 2015 -RECEIVED
TDM Farms, Inc TDM 26 JAN 2 0 2015
PO Box 300 DENR-FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Newton Grove, NC 28366
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS260072
TDM 26
Animal Waste Management System
Cumberland County
'Dear TDM Farms, Inc:
The Division of Water Resources received your sludge survey information on January 13, 2015.
With the survey results, you requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement for the
lagoon at the TDM 26 facility. Due to the amount of treatment volume available, the Division
agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until 2019.
The next sludge survey for this lagoon should be performed before December 31, 2019. Please
call me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Animal Feeding Operations Program
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Permit File AWS260072
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, !North Carolina 27699-1636
Phone: 919$07-64641 Internet: http:1Awww.ncwater.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - Made in part by recycled paper

COHARIE FARMS SLUDGE SURVEY EXEMPTIONS APPROVAL _
March'11, 2009
NO.
FARM NO.
OWNER TAME
FARM NAME
COUNTY
REGIONAL
OFFICE
LAGOON ID
EXTENSION
APPROVED UNTIL
YEAR
1
AWS310066
Charles Edwards
Cedar Lane Farm
Du lin
!,Wilmington
Big & Small Lagoons
12/31/2011
2
AWS3_10395
Christopher Heath
C & S Farm . _
Hunter Farm
Du lin
IDuplin
1wilynington
Wilmington
L#1 & L#2
1
12/31/2012
12/31/2011
3
AWS310792
Michael Hunter
4
AWS400011
Brown Marsh Farms LLC
Dirt Road Farm
lGreene
Greene —
Washington
BI & CI
12/31/2010
5
JAWS400011
Brown Marsh Farms LLC
Dirt Road Farm
Washington
_ C2
L#2 only
12/31/2012
6
AWS400037
Marlowe Farm LLC
Little Creek Hog Farm
Greene
Washington
12/31/2010
7
AWS510041 ; Whitley Stephenson
Spring Meadow Farm
Johnston Ralei h
L#3 only
12/31/2010
8
AWS510055 ;Tracy Denning
T & S Denningfarm
Johnston Raleigh
1
12/31/2012
9
AW1670053
Coharie Hog Farms
Coharie Farms C-I 1
Onslow
Wilmington
1
12/31/2012
10
AWS820037
James Herring
James Herring Farm
ampson
Fayetteville L#1
12/31/2012
11
AWS820072
AD Farms Inc
ADJ Uog Farm3-5
Linoard Howard & Son
Samp on
Sampson
Sampson
Fayetteville
Fayetteville
L#2 only
L#1------I
1 12/31/2010
12!31/2011
12
AWS820074
Linoard Howard
13
AWS820161
Arthur Naylor
Arthur Lee Naylor
Fayetteville
Finishing & Nursery
12/31/2012
14
AWS820175
Jay Sullivan
Ja Sullivan Farm
SampsonFayetteville
L#1
12/31/2012
15
AWS820315
Bobcat Farms LLC
Bobcat Farm
Sam son
Fayetteville
_Y �
L#2 only
Y
12/31/2012
16
AWS820406
Coharie Hog Farm
Coharie Farms C-4
Sampson
Fayetteville
1
12/31/2011
17
AWS820494
Coharie Hog Farm
Coharie Farms New Nursery
Sampson
Fayetteville
1
12/31/2012
18
AWS820516
Thomas Howard
Thomas Howard & Sons Farms
Sam son
Fayetteville
L#1 only
12/31/2012
19
AW_S82_05_29_
Ronald Davis
Davis Nursery
Sampson
Fayetteville
L#I & L#2
12/31/2010
20
AWS820586
F.J. Faison
Sonny Gold/ Sonny Swine
Sam son
Fayetteville
Sonny#1 only
12/31/2012
21
AWS820624
Carlton Barefoot
Sinclair Sow Farm
Sampson
Fayetteville
1
12/31/2012
22
AWS820677
Joel Parker Farms Inc
Running Branch #! 'Sampson
Fayetteville
1
12/31/2011
23
AWS820725
Coharie Ho Farms _
Coharie Farms C-7
Carroll Grad Farm A, B, & C
Sampson.
Wayne
Fayetteville
Washin ton
1
Lagoon C only
12/31/2012
12/31/2012
24
IAWS960161
AWS960138
Carroll Grady_
25
Charles McCle-nny
4M Hog Farm Inc-
Wayne '
Washington
1
12/31/2010
3/11/2009 mdg

Michael F. Easley, Governor
o�0F wA
0 'C
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 1, 2007
Adj Farm Inc, 21��
A.D.J. Hog Farm 3-5
1366 Bass Lake Rd
Roseboro, NC 28382 k.
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS820072
A.D.J. Hog Farm 3-5
Animal Waste Management System
Sampson. County
Dear Adj Farm Inc:
In accordance with your application received on 20-Feb-07, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Adj Farm Inc, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the A.D.J. Hog Farm 3-5, located in Sampson County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 4410 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition 111.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pa
careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit_
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh. NC 27699-1636
Internet: www.ncwatetxluality.or� Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh. NC 27604
An Equal opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recyded/10% Post Consumer Paper
Nam` Carolina
NQIXIrQQIf
Telephone: [phone]
Fax l: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .011 l (c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection staff may be reached at 910433-3300. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at.(919) 733-
3221.
Sincerely,
1v
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Sampson County Health Department
Sampson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS820072

1A1A' Q TFZ I ITII 17ATInKi DI A AI
w ri r. V a 8 v090-%I 1V1• f `8--1I\
Coharie Hog Farm
Tuesday, December 16, 1997
Producer:
Farm Name
Telephone # :
Type of Operation
ADJ Farms
nuJ New rarnl
1366 Bass Lake Rd
RoseborD,NC 2a362
[phone]
Feeder to Fmish Swine
Number of Animals : 4410 hogs design capacity
Application Method: irrigation
REC: RT01
UAR 15 2=
DW-FAYP'TE Ut FIECtt) k OFRCf
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where
waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly
encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be
grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner_ Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
contents of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and avaialable water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre -cautions, waste may
be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on
saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To
maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for
pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more
than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems. This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this is
the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you choose to inject the waste
in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating
waste are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to aF.i_.:y the animal .r4;;te is based or, typi�ai nutrient content
for this type of facility. Acreage requir-3ments should be based on the waste analysis report
from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for ananlysis. This waste
utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
RECEIVED I DENR 1 DWQ
AQUIFr-R'PPOTFr..TinN SECTION
MAR 18 Page 1 of 9
2009

AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
4410 hogs X 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 8379 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
4410 hogs X 2.3 Ibs PAN/hogs/year = 10143 PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application rased on the crop to be grown,
soil type and suface application.
TABLE 1 : ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT FIELD
SOIL TYPE &CLASS -
DETERMINING PHASE
CROP YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES LBS AW APPLIC.
CODE N/ACRE NIACRE USED TIME
i 10527
1
FVVAGRAM0-6%
BC !
4.71
235{
01
6.4
15041
MAR-OCT
10527 -_
1
JWAGRAM0-6%
SG !
50
0
6.4
- 320i
SEP-MAY
10527 I
2
,IWAGRAM 0-6% 1
BC
_1',
4.7f
235'i
01
15.9
3736.5€
MAR-OCT
1 10527 1`
10527
2
3
:WAGRAM0-6%
JOHNS ALL
SG
FC
1
3.7.
50.
185;
0
Oi
15.9
7.4
7951 SEP-MAY
i 369i SEP_AUG
10527 1
4
tIJOHNS ALL i
BC i
4.21
210f
01
9.4
19741
^
MAR-OCT
10527 ��
4
(JOHNS ALL I
SG i
11
501
01
9.4
4701
SEP-MAY
10527 I
5
1WAGRAM 0-6% !
BC i
4.71
2351
01
1.61
376i
MAR-OCT
1 10527 I-
5
IWAGRAM 0-6%
SG 1
11
501
01
1.61
801
SEP-MAY
12
6
1WAGRAM 0-6% _
BC I
4,71
2351
01
1.61
3761
MAR-OCT
10527 1-
6
1WAGRAM 0-6%
SG 1
1 !
501
01
1.6
80!
SEP-MAY
TOTALS: 10168.5
— Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in
some eastern counties of NC to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen -
Page 2 of 9

TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specifications 2.)
Thara ara nn Ar_rpc I pa_qPr]
-- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in field due to overseeding.
**Lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial
nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in TABLES 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE CROP
BC HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-CONTROLLED GRAZED
SG SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
FC TALL FESCUE -CONTROLLED GRAZED
UNITS
LBS NIUNIT
TONS
50
AC
50
TONS
50
A 9 n
raga .i C*1 0

TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW
N USED
TABLE 1 42.3 10.169
TOTALS: 42.3 10,169
AW)IINTnF+U cnnnflr�n• 4n 141
BALANCE -26
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N
produced.
Acres show in each of the proceeding tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter
areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in
the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of
sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nurturient rich and will require precautionary
measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility
will produce approximately 1631.7 pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the
sludge that will need to be removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when
broadcasting the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well special
equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See the attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of
irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture
content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of
irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the
crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 5.92 months. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stored in your structure be within 0 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsiblity of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts
APPLICATION
APPLICATION
TRACT
FIELD SOIL TYPE
CROP
RATE (inlhr)
AMT (inches)
10527
I. _'. 5- ( wAGRAM 0-6%
SG
I 0.60
'1
10527
'. n WAGRAM 0-6%
i BC
i 0.60
'1
10527
`JOHNS ALL
1
SG
I 0.50
'1
10527
JOHNS ALL
I
I EC
0.50
I '1
10527
a JOHNS ALL
BC
i 0.50
1 -
This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of
nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
aijiuunt shown cannot :De applied because the nitrogen limitation. fhe maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Page 4 of 9

NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
This plan is based on wettable acres.
Page 5 or 9

PI ANC R CD1=r'IPIr_QTIf1AI0.
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of Water Quality for every
day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy
of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing
him/her the use of the land for waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for
other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff
leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM. (See
FOTG Stantard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the NRCS Technical Reference -
Environment file for guidance.)
'7. Liquid waste shall be'applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with
a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take uo released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop on bare soil.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
the outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from anv residential oronerty boundary
Page 6of9

and from any perennial stream or river (other that an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied
closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal Waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landownwer.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property, and public right - of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted croplands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the application causes no runoff or
drift from the site.
*16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
*17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge.
*18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
*19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
Kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be, used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for
direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied as a preemergence with no other applications of
animal waste during the crop season_
*21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark
the maximum storage volume fpr waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
ai ,ualiy ' � t,, up wit=, m icre wasie pi oduuis are appiiea. nitrogen snaii be the rate -
determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted
for optimum crop production amd maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
Page 7 of 9

23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina Department of
Agriculture regulations.
* Liquid Systems
Page 8 of 9

NAME OF FARM: ADJ New Farm
OWNER 1 MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance precedures estalished in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm
named above. 1 (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste
treatment and/or storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new utilization
{pia+, and a new certification to oe sunmitted to DEM oetcre the new animals are stocked.
(we) understand that I must own or have acces to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must
be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs_
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: ADJ Farms
SIGNATURE: �i�cx�
NAME OF MA#GE�/((ififferent from owner):_
SIGNATURE:
DATE. � - 1 � ` '� F_
please print
DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: Curtis Barwick
AFFILIATION: Coharie Hog Farm
ADDRESS (AGENCY): 300 Westover Rd.
Clinton, NC 28328
(9 0) 592- 22
SIGNATURE: DATE:
7r-,�, -�,.
Page 9 of 9

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source
cause
IIAIPS 11) couli-01 Insects Site Specific hradices
Liquid Systems
Flush Gutters
Accumulation ol'solids
M
Flush system is desibucd and operaled
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids hom
gutters as designed.
0
Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and fits
• Crusted Solids
®
Maintain lagoons, seining basins alld hiss wllcic
hest breeding is apparent to mininihm the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than G -
B inches over more than 30% of surface.
Excessive VegcIal,ve
0 Decaying vegelation
M
Maintain vegetative control along banks of
Glowth
lagoons and other imlwlmdments to prevent
,IMJITIUIallon of decaying VCE;CIaIiVC lnaltCr
along waters edge on ImpoundmenI's perimeter.
Dry Systems
Feeders
• heed Spillage
C7
Design, operale and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and Iroughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage.
IN
Clcan up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during surnmer; 15-30 day interval
during winter).
Feed Stmage
+ ACculnulallUoS of feed residues
CI
Reduce moisture accumulation within and
ammid immediate perimeter of reed storage
areas by insuring dri1111,agi: away from site
and/or (1rOV1dilig atIC1111:11C C011I:11I1111Cn1
_
covered bill for brC1VCr 5 gri1111 null similar Ililjll
moisture grain producls).
❑
Inspect for aml remove or break up accultlulaled
Solids In filler SIr111S :11oUNILI teed storage as
needed.
AM1C - November 11, 1996, Page I

Source Clause II'NIPS to Controi Insects, Site Specific Pracliccs
Animal Holding Areas • Acconsulalions of attitual wastes ci Eliminale low areas that trap nloisture along;
and Iced wastage Fences and other locations wherc waSle
accumulates alit# disturbance by animals is
nlittintal. ,
i� Maintain fence rows and Ater strips around
ailiiind bolding areas to mirtimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
reutave or break up accumulaled solids as
stcerleil).
Ory Maryu(c I had1itl� • Accumidatiurzs of animal +vasies C1 Remove spillage on a toutnie basis [c.g,, 7 - 10
Sysicias clay inlcrval. during summer, 15-30 day irilervat
din irig %viritcr) where manure is loaded for land
applicatioii or disposal.
0 Provide for adequale drainage around rnantitc
stockpiles.
© Inspect for mid remove or break up accuroulatcd
wasin in filter strips around stockpiles and
111,111me 11,11 11i11g al'eas its 11ceded,
rur moic liifovitatio i coolact the Cooperative Extension Service, Depiiilnrent of Enloinology, I3ox 7613, North Carolina State Uviiycislly,
Raleigh, NC, 2 7695-7G 13.
JtMIC - Novenibcr 11, 1996, Page 2

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source
Cause
MIN to hllnbnhe Odor Sitc Spccirle Pruclires
Farmstead
• Swine I)rodllclioll
0
Vegetative or wooded buffers; ()
0
Recommended best managemcnl practices;
P
Good judgment and common sense
Animal body sus l:,ces
• !]illy manure -covered animals
M
Ivry !loots
Floor surfaces
• Wet manure -covered floors
Slotted Iloors-
M Waterers located over slotted floors;
❑ Feeders al high end of solid floors;
CJ Scrape manure buildup from floors;
❑ Underfloor ventilation for drying
Manule colleclioa bits . Urine; 177 I requcrll manure removal by flush, hit rechaige,
• Partial microbial decomposition or scrape;
Cl Under lloor ventilation
Vela ilakorl exhao a falls • Volatile gases; [fib Fan maintenance,
D1151
M
Ellicicnt air movcmew
Indoor surfaces
Dust
M
Washdown between groups ofaidmals;
9
1-cell additives;
❑
Feeder covers;
❑
Feed delivery downspout extenders to feeder
Covers
Flush larks
Agitation ofrecycled lagoon
❑
Flush lank covers;
liquid while tanks are filling
❑
Extend fill lines to near bollum of links wills
anti-siphotl vents
l lush alleys
Agitation during wastewater
❑
Underfloor flush with underfloor ventilation
collvayance
Pit recharge point;
0 Agitation ol-recycled lagoon
❑
Exlend Iecharge lines to near bottom ul' pits
liquid while pits are filling
with anti-siplllnt vents
Lift slakolls
• Agitation during sump lank
❑
Sump lank covers
filling and drawdown
Outside drain vollcclion
• Agitation during wastewater
C1
!lox covers
orj(lllctioll boxes
Conveyance ,
I
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 3

5nnrrc Criusc 111hil's to hilidulize Odor Site Specific I'raclicts
Land of diainpipcs ;it • Agitaliun during waslcwaler D I?xteud discharge point of pipes un dcincath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces 0 Volatile gas emissions; ® 1'iuper lagoon liquid capacily;
• Biological mixing; ❑ Couccl lagouu startup ploccdures;
• Aghatiun M Minimum surface area-lo-volunic ratio;
0 Milliliium rlgitalioll Sussed I►Illilpil►g;
❑ Mechanical anical aclatioll,
0 Ihoven biological additives As oee)4
lr1 igatioll spri+iklcr
I sigh pre sole agitaliuu;
0
brigale on dry days wills lirltc or no wiled;
nursics
Wind di ill
®
Mininruln lecommcuded opciating Incssule;
®
I'ulnlr intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑
Pulnp train second -singe lagoon
Storage hulk or basin
9 I'arlial Iniciubial dceumposilion;
❑
Dollom or Midlevel loadiol;;
511rface
Mixing while filling;
.
❑
'Prink cams;
0 A gllatiun when emplying
0
Dasin surface nuts of solids;
❑
I'roven biological nddilives or oxidants
Scllling basil► surface
a Partial microbial decompusilion;
❑
Iixlcnd drainpipe uullcis luldelneadl li+lllid
a Mlxnig while filling;
level;
• Agllation when cinplying
❑
Iicillove scliled solids I'cgndal ly
ivhinurc, slurry or sludge
slircadcr uullcis
Wcoveled nlallirrc, slurry or sludge on fir Id
sill faces
Dears anim"lls
Dcad auinial disposal
pis c
I sic incr airs
6 Agilaliun when spicadiug;
• Vulalile gas culissiuns
• Volatile gas cnlissiorls while
diving
+ Crucass decomposition --
0 Carcass deconlpusilion
• lllculnpicte cunibusliull
❑ soil injection of slurry/sludges;
❑ Wash icsidual wanme fiem spreader allcr irse;
Proves, biological addiiivcs or oxidants
Cl Soil hijccliull ofsluuy/sludges T
Cl Soil incurporrllion rvilhin'18 Ills.;
LI Spread ill thin imili►rm layers fur rapid drying;
❑ Proven biological addilives or oxidants
f9 I'ruper disposillou of cmcasses
CI Cuniplelc Cllming lit calcasses ill burial pits;
Cl hollur Iocaliull/cullsllliclioll ul disposill lNls
❑ Sccundary slack limucis
r
ANIOC - Nuvcrllbcr 11, 1996, Page 4

Ss race Cause DMZ's In N110miz.e Odor Site Specific {'raclices
Standing «ater to ound • Improper drainage; C3 Grade and landscape such that water drains
I:lcilities . Microbial decomposilion or away rrom facilities
organic tuallcr
Maniac tra:kcd unto • Poorly maintained access roads C7 farut access road mahilenance
public loads 1'10111 rarm
access
Addiliunal lilrunnalion ; Available Runt :
Swine Manure Managemew ; 0200 Ru1c/BMI' Packet NCSU, Caunty Extension Ccnlei
Swine Pro(iucliou Dann Putculial Odor Sources and Remedies ; E-BAli tact Sltcct NCSU - 11AF
Nwirte Proilucliuu Facility Manurc Managcuscnt: Pit Rcellarge - Lagoou'1'scalntcnl ; Ia]Ati 128-88 NCSU - 11AF
Swine hoduction Facility Manurc Ntanagcmenl: Underfloor Flush - Lagomi'IicaUucul ; IiBAIi 129-88 NCSI.I - IIAIi
k1roots Dt: J)"n and MillagemcM Cur Livestock Manure Ti-calinew and Slulagc ; i311A1i I 113-83 NCSU - IIAI's
Calilsraliun of t*latuoc and wastewaler Application EquiptncM ; I;IIAIr Fact Shccl NCSU - BAli
Cunlsvlling Odors front Swine Buildings ; 11111-3 3 NC%U - Swine EXICnsiml
Envimmuc.tlal Assmance Progtatn ; NPPC Manual NC Potk hoduccts Asst c
Options for Managing Odor ; a rcpols from lire Swine Odor Task Force NCSl1 Agri Commmicaliwis
Nuisance Concel'its in Animal Mattttre Matragcment: Odors and Plies ; PRO107, 1995 Confcience Ihocccdings Vim ida (:111311csative hl'alsion
AMOC - Nc.vcmbcr 11. 1996, Page 5

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
-Pr_ir_iai_ Ff1TPP ;.a-o-r. 1.a..-.a..nT... •4
UQ,h.L yLT '- LCL
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
Complete incineration
i
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
rJ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
i
December 18, 1996

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
€'H047 ?�"UNLBERS
DWQ SIG 4rY6, - lSyI
ENERGENCY''�1. ti.'.G=! rti i SYSTEM
SwCD Sys - 716 3
N RC5 T2.2- 7 9 k- 3
This plan. will be implernented in the event that wastes from your operation are Ieaking,
overflowinz, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at tht facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this mayor may not be
possible. Suggested responses to sorne possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. adz' soil to berrn to increase elevation of darn.
b. Pumnp wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the 122aon ir. m.111ediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no su—iface water is emerinz la¢oon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. I=ediately stop waste application.
b. Crete a tMvorary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. E•.•aluate and -lim unate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. E`•aluat= the zvolication rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leaka!_ Loin t -vasie pipes and. spri, kitT -action include:
a. Sic-o recvcle puma. .
b. Sion 1r.-?=1tion nU1-1
C. CIOs__
d- R_pair all Ie t:s prior to restan ng i)ur, 1ps.
D: lft—c : il:-Si- Svsit""a. C_veS, solid s�­a.:ato-5-action include:
C. i_L i:r2 rf'y
d. S( n all iio°'•S 1^`t'll� 11�_S�. flush sys:tms, of -solid sepa.ratorS.
Decernber 18, 1996

e. R�pair all Ieatis Prior to resLa--Lin_ pumps.
L: Lea.:a5!_ Ir orn bay= or side';�'aI! vi IaEoon, 0::_.. this is seepaze as op) )osed Co
Flowin_ lea.'•:s- pessi'ole a;.tio;l:
Di; a s nall su:"1p or ditch awav from the ernbankrnent to catch alI seenaze,
put in a submersible pump, and porno back to Ia+oon.
b. lI holes are caused by bu.,owin- animals, trap or renove arlirnals and till
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious darnaa_s.
a_ Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
C. Any damage noted, such as emaloyee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
Z. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or o:f of the proper-�v)?
h_ Hoy, much reached surface waters?
Contact ap pro slate aQenci--s.
a. Durin 2 no=al business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
rezional office; Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942.
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the Iocation or
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b_ 11 spill Ieaves property or enters su.:ace waters, call local EMS Phone number -
C. histt^uct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CHS. phone number - - , local SWCD office phone nu-mber
and local tiRCS office for advice/teci,nlcal assistance phone nurn, ber - -
-4r: li none of the above �'Ork_5 call 91 1 or Cl1e �herliI s Depart semi and -,explain your
prcblemn io zhcrn and a5i: .ilai i2:50- to ccnLact the proper agencies for you.
5: COr,r2c— ::� colstra_tor of :'our ciiolce to bP�ll: ie w 1 Oi pry ,le n IO rrLnln"1'_e Oii-51Ce
da i:;a .
a. Con n-::TcJ rs 'a Ie
Dec_:nbn-r 16. 1996

6: Contact the technica] specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting
Engineer, etc.)
a. Name:
b. Phone:_ S y;4 —If t t 7.2 —Ya'�+
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with release of �,astes from happening again.
cQr,

MN AL FACILITY A_NIN -kL CERTIFICATION FORM
Certincatc of Coverage or Permit Number AL_ A,?YLf-n County Year 200
Facility Name (as show on Certificate of Coverage or Permit). fie
Operator in Charge for this Facility _ R n. n _ L Certification i� lt3�.
---Land application of animal waste..as allowed b}7..the-.above.permit.occurr--d during-the_past_calendar year-- -- - - --..- .
---:G YES NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part II and proceed to the- certification. Also, if animal waste
was generated but no: land applied, please attach an explanation on hour the animal waste was handled.
Part I : Faciliiv Information:
Total number of application FieldsXor Pulls iiD (please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWNIP): Total Useable Acres approved in the CAVJMP
2. Total number of Fields �Y_ or Pulls ❑ (please check the appropriate box) on which land application
occurred during the year: ip Total Acres on which waste was applied
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
4. Total pounds -of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the C AWMP and
the permit: d' L l
5. Estimated amount of total manure, liner and process wastewater -sold or°given-to other persons and -taken
off site during the vear Af I tons ❑ or gallons 1:1 (please check the appropriate box)
6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
3 M 7 Frr �, )q,,,
7. Largest and smallest .number of animals by type at this facility at any one tirne during the previous year:
Largest I's_ 3
Smallest 1� 1 1 _ r.� ..#,-
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals
at the facility is the annual average numbers)
S. Facility's Integrator if applicable: _ ��•, l„�,� �s _ -
Part II: FacifijX Status:
IF THE _NSW -ER TO :AINY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO". PLEASE PROVIDE A VvRJTTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO "A'HY THE FACILITY'W AS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
C0MPLL4NCE- AND E)TL_AIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRLNG THIS F _kCI :I T Y BACK INTO COMPLLANC£.
I. Only antral waste generated at this facillry was annlied to the permitted sites during xll�Y es � No
the past calendar ;rear. - - -
AFACr 3-14.-03 1
FEB r 3 2006
DMR - FAYE1f E111LLE REGIONAL OFACE

2. The facility was operated in such a way .that -there was no direct runoff of waste from fi� Yes ! � No
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year. `
3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past SrYes ❑ No'
calendar year.
4_ There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during 9 Yes El No,,: r .
-- a past -calendar year.
5 There '�vas no PAN application to any fields or-cropss at-thisfacility' heater than the ' Yes ❑ .No -
levels specified in this facility's CAWNIP during'the:pasi calendar year. -
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year. Y Yes ❑ No
-
7 `'Slud e accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the 1 oon�"`" z
` g °Yes -'❑ No -
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatriient volume to less than°the volume°=' ,,? .­r.•_:._-
for which the lagoon was designed.
8. A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification. Yes ❑ No
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the Yes ❑ No
past calendar year.
10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year? W Yes ❑ No
11. All required monitoring and reporting -was performed in accordance with the facility's Yes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
.from the Division of Water Quality. -
,13. Crops as specified in the CAWNT were maintained during the past calendar year on all J1 Yes ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the' CAWMP for this facility were Yes ❑ No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
46
1 certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted_ Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system; or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations_"
AD j- f;" s
ttee Name and Title (tvoe or
Z �v
Date
t- z� !o
Signature of Operator in Chikae Date
(if different from Permittee)
AFACF 3-14-03

Appendix 3. Lapoon Sludge Survey Form �}
A Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number_il/M
B. Lagoon Identification
C. Person(s) taking Measurements `'Y 5 67 '4 ' , e 4
D. Date of Measurements
E. Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer.
49A 5
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (so jl of lagoon
p tfL
c. Tl3iclmess of the sludge layer if making a direct mea ► not with "core sampler":
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside tap of bank): 1 7-2 (acres)
(Draw sketch of lagoon on a separate sheet and list dimensions, and calculate satiate area)
G. Estimate number of sampling points:
a Less than 133 arse: Use 8 points
b. If more than 1,33 acre, L � acres x 6 = % , with maximum of 24.
(Using sketch and dimensions, develop a uniform "grid" that has number of intersection points that match
most closely with the estimated number of sampling points needed. Number the grid intersection points on
the lagoon grid to correspond with the data to be m ❑rded for points of measurement)
Ii.
Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Sheet". .
I.
At time of sludge survey, also measure the distance from the Ma hnm Liquid Level
17
to.the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gage poie):
J.
Determine distance from Maximum Liquid Level to Minimum Liquid Level:
.� .
(Determine from Plan or other lagoon rcmrds)
K_
Calculate distance from present liquid surface level to Minimum Liquid
level: Item J— Item I, assuming present liquid level is below Max. Liq. Level:
�r
L.
Record froth sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the lagoon bottom
(average for all the measurement points):
M.
Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
S
to the top of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points):
_ M
N.
Record from sludge survey data sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer.
3 . `l
0.
Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone (Item M — Item K):
/r
(Note: If Item 0 is less than 4 ft., a sludge removal and utilization plan may be required by
N. C. DWQ. See your specific permit or content DWQ for more info oration.)
P.
Proceed to Sludge Volume Worksheet if desire to calculate sludge volume for rectangular
shaped
lagoon with uniform• side slope.
Completed by.) � tr i j Date: .2 -4�— dS
Print Name Signature
1�

Appendix 4
Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Lagoon ID AD.! Farms #1 Big Lagoon 82-72
Completed by
Curtis G Barwick
Date 1211912005
9" to max. lquid level
A
B C
C-B
Grid Pt Dist. To top of sludge Dist to lagoon bottom
Thickness of sludge layer
feet(tenth) feet(tenth)
feet(tenth)
1
5.4
8.7
3.3
2
5.5
9.0
3.5
3
5.7
8.7
3.0
4
5.6
9.1
3.5
5
5.6
9.1
3.5
6
5.5
9.2
3.7
7
5.6
9.5
3.9
8
5.5
9.2
3.7
g
5.6
9.0
3.4
10
5.8
8.7
2.9
11
5.3
9.0
3.7
12
5.6
8.8
3.2
13
0-0
14
0.0
15
0.0
16
0.0
17
0.0
18
0.0
19
0.0
20
0.0
21
0.0
22
0.0
23
0.0
24
0.0
AVERAGE
5.6
9.0
3.4

Appendix 3. Lagoon Sludge Survey Form
A Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number_ S V
13. Lagoon Identification
C. Person(s) taking Measurements
D. Date of Measurements
E. Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer:
DAle
K
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (sail) of lagoon
P,
c. niclmess of the sludge layer if making a direct measurementwith "core sampler":
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): fib (acres)
(Drain sketch of lagoon on a separate sheet and list dimensions, and calculate surface area)
G. Estimate number of sampling points:
a' Less than I.33 acre: Use 8 points
b. If more than 1.33 acre, a-= x 6 = with maximum of 24.
(Using sketch and dimensions, develop a tmiform "grid" that has number of intersection points that match
most closely with the cstimared number of sampling points needed. Number the grid iat.--se:ion points on
the lagoon grid to correspond with the data to be. recorded for points of measurement.)
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Sheet".
1. At time of sludge survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level
to.the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gage pole):
J. Determine distance from Maximum Liquid Level to Minimum Liquid Level: e • � ._
(Determine from Plan or other lagoon records)
K. Calculate distance from present liquid surface level to Minimum Liquid
level: Item J — item I, assuming present liquid level is below Max. Liq. Level: It
L. Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level ��
to the lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points): 1 • l
M. Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface Ievel
to the tap of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points): !�•
N. Record from sludge survey data sheet the average thicla3ess of the sludge layer: 3
0. Calculate the thickness of t,Ie existing Liquid Treatment Zone (Item M—Item
(Note: If Item 0 is less than 4 ft., a sludge removal and utilization plan may be required by
N. C. DWQ, See your specific permit or contact DWQ for more information.)
P. Proceed to Sludge Volume Worl sheet if desire to calculate sludge volume for rectangular shaped
lagoon with uniform side slope.
Completed by:) S c, I��, y,� �� Date:
Print Name Signature
13

Appendix 4
Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Lagoon ID
AD.] Farms #2 Small Lagoon 82-72
Completed by
Curtis G Barwick
Date 12/19/2005
9" to max_ Iquid level
A
B
C
C-B
Grid Pt Dist. To top of sludge
Dist to lagoon bottom
Thickness of sludge layer
feet(tenth)
feet(tenth)
feet(tenth)
1
5.8
8.7
2.9
2
5.4
9.5
4.2
3
5.5
9.6
4.1
4
5.9
8.8
2.9
5
5.7
9.5
3.8
6
6.7
9.6
2.9
7
6.1
9.8
3.7
8
6.3
9.7
3.4
9
0.0
10
0.0
11
0.0
12
0.0
13
0.0
14
0.0
15
0.0
16
0.0
17
0.0
18
0.0 _
19
0.0
20
0.0
21
0.0
22
0.0
23
0.0
24
0.0
AVERAGE
5.9
9.4
3.6

�)- -;�Z-
1-919-735-1 S51
1-800-672-3106
1-919-735-9946 FAX
COASTAL METAL SERVICE
P,O. Box 128, Goldsboro, N.C. 27533
a
3 25 xx4o:
15
.1
J
ti
r 3 xay}su

'! '
J
State of North Carolina = N
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
A.D.J. Hog Farm 3-5
1366 Bass Lake Rd
Roseboro NC 28382
Attn: Jeff Warren
Dear Jeff Warren:
IT
4 • •
f
iv
D
NOV 0 8 2aoa
E
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NAZFURAL RESOURCES
rEy1tL.E
REG. OFFICE
October 20, 2000
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS820072
82— r?2
A.D.J. Hog Farm 3-5
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Sampson County
In accordance with your application received on June 11, 1998, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to Wayne & Ronald Cannady and Jeff Warren, authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but
not limited to, the management of animal waste from the A.D.J. Hog Farm 3-5, located in Sampson
County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 4410 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as
specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). The conditions required in the
attached letter to ADJ Farms, Inc. from the Division of Water Quality, Fayetteville Regional
Office, dated May 31, 2000 are hereby incorporated into the permit for this facility.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

L
W V
Certificate of Coverage AWS820072
A.D.J. Hog Farm 3-5
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process_ Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Aerr T
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Sampson County Health Department
Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Sampson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files
c
Stevens

ATLA
NCDENR
S. HJnT JP..
SILL HO_MAN
SE=RETAP•Y
KiRR T. STivEAs
712rEGTOR
_ f NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT Or
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
i=AYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 31, 2000
• x an tags
• s • ,
ADJ Fauns, Inc.
Attn.: Jeff Warren
1366 Bass Lake Road
Roseboro, NC 28382
SUBJECT: LAGOON STRUCTURE
ADJ Swine Faun 3-6
Facility No. 82 - 72
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Warren:
On January 3, 2000, the Favettevill. Regional Office of the Division of
grater Quality rectived a proposal to addre-s The seeping lagoon at the ADJ 3-5
farZ37 site. The proposal has been rei7auved by our office and the follo-wing items
should b_ impl-=tnted during a E'or aht4— the construction of the interceptor
drain.:
1. The irstallaT on of this interceptor drain should be supervised directly by a
professional Er ai-It r to msure the suuctural integiry of the IaaDDn.
2. If the condition of the dam changes during or after the construction of the
drai-=1 die Fayettei ille Regional Office should be contacted immediately.
3. If for any reason, the system cannot adequately handle the quantity of water
entering the system (due to a component of the system failing or if the actual
volume of water entering the system exceeds the calculated volume) the
Fayetteville Regional Office should be notified immediately.
^_ Tne entire waste management system should be inspected on a daily basis to
prevent any failure.
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714 / SYL'EL 9LD. FAYCTTEYILLE. NORTH C AROLINA 26801-5048
p"OwE 910186-]541 FAX [phone]D7
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / A:PIRMA;y V[ ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCi?c Dfltl% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

W-
Page 2
ADJ Faun _
May 31, 2000
5. The existing ditch should be sampled quarterly for the following parameters and submitted to the
Fayetteville Regional Office:
NO3 - as N Total Ammonia (NH4 - as N)
Fecal Coliform
6. The existing ditch should be monitored for a period of one year to verify whether contaminants
have been eliminated. Until this has been determined and approved, the ditch should remain blocked
at all times_
7. A record should be maintained of any amount of water added to the lagoon as a result of the
interceptor drain.
This letter in no way absolves ADJ Farms, Inc. from complying with all State and Federal
regulations. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jeffery Brown
Environmental Engineer
cc: Sue Homewood - Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Central Files - Raleigh
Trent Allen - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Wilson Spencer - Sampson Co. �TRCS
Curtis Barwick - Coharie Farms
Art Barnhardt - FRO Groundwater Supervisor

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: A.D.I. Hog Farm 3-5 0. R L- -
lz�
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Wayne & Ronald nn a Caady / Warren _TW •v� �Qu4-", V��
1.3 Mailing address. 1366
City, State: Roseboro NC
Lake Rd
Telephone Number (include area code): 910-564-6207
Zip: 283,2
1.4 County where facility is located: Sampson V
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Leave Clinton on Hwy. 24 West go 3_miles to State
3
Road 1309, farm on Bass Lake Road, go 5 miles Aa+sign on left.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Coharie Farms
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: �_�
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable): / y3
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2A Facility No.: 82^ (county number); _72 {facility number}.
2.2 Operation Description: Swine operation
�FeeTer to Finish
4410- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? 5ayes; F71 no. if no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
Wean to Feeder Layer Dairy
Feeder to Finish Non -Layer Beef
Farrow to Wean (# sow) Turkey
Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm. No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 1/28/98 Page 1 of 4 82 - 72

3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
Sri S yf, j�
system): 4-3 ;Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): U
2.4 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? or NO (please circle one)
2.5 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? ('ES o (please circle one)
2.6 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
�J or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general locatiop map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
v!�.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
--3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3' 3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
5 :3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
✓3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
A.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
--'3.3.9 The required MRCS Standard specifications.
A.3.10 A site schematic.
3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
./3.3. I3 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
fi4Niortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.15 goon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.)
If your CAWMP includes components not shown on this list, such as an irrigation design,
or site evaluation, please include the additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 1/28/98 Page 2 of 4 82 - 72

Facility Number: 82 - 72
Facility Name: A.D.J. Hog Farm 3-5
4. APPLICAA�NT'S CERTIFICATION:
1, _�� �Na_Jr�,r` _ (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for 1AQT Foyn^ 3— S (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate afid complete to the best of my knowledge..I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be rettrted t9 me Vhcomplete.
Signature
Date 4, :26,
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I,
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question LI)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED- APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 1/28/98 Page 3 of 4 82 - 72

` WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Coharie Hog Farm
Tuesday, December 16, 1997
Producer: ADJ Farms
Farm Name: AOJ New Farm
1366 Bass Lake Rd
Roseboro,NC 28382
Telephone # : [phone]
Type of Operation : Feeder to Finish Swine
Number of Animals : 4410 hogs design capacity
Application Method: irrigation
yir r E L s` E �; N
JUN 1 t 1998
Nora-Disci;age perm .iftjng
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where
waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly
encouraged so that ail plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be
grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the reeds of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
contents of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and avaialable water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre -cautions, waste may
be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on
saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen_ Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To
maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for
pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied tb bare ground not more
than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems. This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this is
the manner in which you have chosen to appiy your waste. If you choose to inject the waste
in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating
waste are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report
from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for ananlysis. This waste
utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.021 7 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
Page 1 of 9

AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
I
44.10 flogs X 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 8379 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
4410 hogs X 2.3 Ibs PAN/hogs/year = 10143 PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type and suface application.
TABLE 1 : ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE &CLASS -
DETERMINING PRASE
10527
1
WAGRAM 0-6%
10527
- 1
WAGRAM 0-6%
10527
2
WAGRAM 0-6%
10527
- 2
WAGRAM 0-6%
10527
3
JOHNS ALL
10527
4
JOHNS ALL
10527
- 4
JOHNS ALL
10527
5
WAGRAM 0- %
10527
- 5
WAGRAM 0-6%
10527
6
WAGRAM 0-6%
10527
_ 6
WAGRAM 0-6%
CROP YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES LBS AW APPLIC.
CODE
NIACRE
N/ACRE
USED
TIME
BC
4.7
235
0
6.4I
1504
MAR-OCT
SG
1
50
0
6.41
320
SEP-MAY
BC
4.7
235
0
15.91
3736.5
MAR-OCT
SG
1
50
0
15.9i
795
SEP-MAY
FC
3.7
185
0
10.6!
1961
SEP-MAY
BC
4.2
210
0
9.4,
1974
MAR-OCT'
SG
1
50
0
9.4j
470
SEP-MAY
BC
4.7
235
0
1.61
376
MAR-OCT
SG
1
50
0
i .5,
80
SEP-MAY
BC
4.7
235
0
1.61
376
MAR-OCT
SG
1
50
0
1.6'
80
SEP-MAY
TOTALS:
10760.5
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
Indicates a Crop Rotation
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zane Management Act will require farmers in
some eastern counties of NC to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2of9

TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must`be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specifications 2.)
There are no Acres Leased
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
' Indicates a Crop Rotation
Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in field due to overseeding.
"'Lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial
nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in TABLES 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
LBS NIUNIT
BC
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-CONTROLLED GRAZED
TONS
50
SG
SMALL GRAIL! OVERSEEDED
AC
50
FC
TALL FESCUE -CONTROLLED GRAZED
TONS
50
Page 3 of 9

TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW
N USED
TABLE 1 45.5! 10,7661
TOTALS: 45.5 10,761
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED: 10,143
— BALANCE -618
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N
produced.
Acres show in each of the proceeding tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter
areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in
the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of
sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nurturient rich and will require precautionary
measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility
will produce approximately 1631.7 pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the
sludge that will need to be removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when
broadcasting the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well special
equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See the attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of
irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture
content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of
irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the
crop,
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 5.92 months. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stored in your structure be within 0 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsiblity of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts
APPLICATION
APPLICATION
TRACT
FIELD SOIL TYPE
CROP
RATE (inlhr)
AMT (inches)
10527
v WAGRAM 0-6%
SG
0.50
'1
10527
�, _. . r, WAGRAM 0-6%
3C
0.60
1
10527
JOHNS ALL
SG
0.50
'1
10527
;JOHNS ALL
FC
0.50
1
10527
JOHNS ALL
BC
0.50
'1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of
nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. in many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied 'because the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Page 4 of 9

NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Due to a wet winter of 97-98, the coastal bermuda failed in field #3. This field will be planted
in fescue in Aug -Sep 98. Millet will be planted in May -June 98 in field #3 for waste application
in the interim period.Nitrogen application rates will be 220 # per acre, for the millet planted in
field #3.
Page 5 of 9

PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS ,
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10.000 per day by the Division of Water Quality for every
day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy
of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing
him/her the use of the land for waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data. climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for
other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff
leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM. (See
FOTG Stantard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
B. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the NRCS Technical Reference -
Environment file for guidance.)
*7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils. during rainfall events. or when the
surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with
a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop on bare soil.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1. 1995 shall comply with the following:
the outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
comoonent of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from anv residential orooemt boundary
Page 6 of 9

and from any perennial stream or river (other that an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied
closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal Waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landownwer.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right - of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted croplands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the application causes no runoff or
drift from the site.
*16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
*17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed. special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation_ ;
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge.
*18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
*19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for
direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied as a preemergence. with no other applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
`21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark
the maximum storage volume fpr waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -
determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted
far optimum crop production amd maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. �J�J2ste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
Page 7 of 9

23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a mannbr that meets North Carolina Department of
Agriculture regulations.
* Liquid Systems
Page 8of9

NAME OF FARM: ADJ New Farm
OWNER / MANAGER AGREEMLNT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance precedures estalished in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm
named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste
treatment and/or storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new utilization
plan and a new certification to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are stocked.
1 (we) understand that I must own or have acres to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must
be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: ADJ Farms
SIGNATURE: f"�� I���v!.� DATE:
NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner):
please print
SIGNATURE: DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: Curtis Barwick
AFFILIATION: Coharie Hog Farm
ADDRESS (AGENCY): 300 Westover Rd.
Clinton, NC 28328
(910) 592-I],22
SIGNATURE: ��u.y'` DATE: ='
Page 9 of 9

I j
�, We
r.4
All
V ',I, yT
Rr"i17iyr • UN IN V-J(Vl.,,,,,fl?l6,,!
Aj b!

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
source Cause ON1115 to Conlrul 111SCl'ts Site Specific Practices
Uquid Systems
Flush Gutters Accumulation of solids IN Mush systcrn is designed and operated
suflicicnlly to remove accrumllated solids fruit
gutters us designed.
0 Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and fits • Gusted Solids M Maintain lagoons, sellhug basius and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize lite
crusling of solids to a depth of no Inure than G -
K inches over mum than 30% of surface.
Excessive Vegetative Decaying vegetatiolr M Maiulain vegetative cunlrul along banks of
Growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accuuudalion of lleciaymg vegelattve inaller
along watcr's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Pry tiySIC1115
I;ccdcrs 49 Feed Spillage ❑ Design, operntc aunt maintain feed systems (c,g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accunndalum ofdcc:aying Wastage.
0 Clean up spillogc on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - IO
clay interval dm itrg summer; 1 S-all day interval
during; winter).
Deed Storage • Accumulations of feed residues
Reduce moisture accunmlalion within a1-sd
orotund immexdime periuleler of feed storage
areas by iusuriug drainage away from site
and/or plovilling adeyuale conluinnicnt (c.g.,
covered bin for brewer's train and similar high
ruoislurc grain proclucts).
❑ Inspect for and remove or U eA up accumulated
solids iu filler strips arormd feed storage as
needed.
AMIC - November It, 1996, Page I

Source Cause
11hil's It) Corrlrol Ittsects. Site Specific l'racliees
Animal I Iuldiiig Areas • Accumulmions Ulanimal wastes
Cl
Fliminale low areas iliac trali moislute along
and iced wamage
Fences and other krcaiiotis where waste:
acculti idles atilt disItAlballce by ailillmis is
lltllillilal,
Cl
Maintait1 fence rows mid filter Strips around
illtiltial holding areas 10 Illittimize
;LCCLitillililt tUllS of wastes (i.e., inspect for ittt(l
mmove or break up accumulated Solids as
necded).
Uiy Manure I laudling • Accumulmions ol' animal wastes
❑
Remove spillage Un a iotltim basis (c.g,. 7 - 10
SYSICITiS
day interval during Suntuter; 15-30 Jay interval
doting Ivinler) where matim is loaded for Icmd
ipplicalioll or disposal.
Ci
Provide tar adetluale drainage around manure
stockpiles.
CI
inspect for aluI remove or break tilt accumulaied
wastes ill Tiller Sit ips around slocllpllcS doll
Ittallum Iialidling areas aS IicCiltd,
For more in(ori+lation contact lite Cooficralivc Extension Service, Ucpailinent of Entomology, Ilux 7613, North Carolina Slale llnivetsily,
Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613.
AM IC - November It, 1996, Page 2

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source
Cause
IINII's In Minimize Odnr site Specific Practices
Farmstead
• Swine production
FA
Vegetative or wooded buffers; o'-,
10
Recommended best managen►cul praclices;
III
Good judgment and common sense
Animal body surfaces
• Ditty manure -covered animals
IN
Dry Iloors
Floor surfaces
0 Wei rmumre-covered floors
IN
Slulled floors;
N
Waterers localed over slolled fluors;
0
Feeders at high cud of solid floors;
f_l
Scrape manure buildup front floors;
Cl
Underfloor venlilalinn for drying
Manure collection Ails • Urine; fl Frcq►rein rnanure removal by flush, pit recharge,
• Partial rniclobial decomposition or scrape;
❑ Undcrlluor ventilation
Vewitalion exhausi farts • Volatile gases; 0 Fall mainlenance;
Dust M Iifliciew air movemunl
Indoor surfaces Dust ® Washdown between groups of animals;
0 FCed additives;
O Feeder covers;
Cl Feed delivery downspout exlenlers to feeder
COM s
Iluslr ranks + Agitation of recycled lagoon f 1 Mush lank covers;
liquid while links we filling F1 Fxieud fill lines to near bollom oflaaks with
anli-siphon vents
Hush alleys 0 Agitaliun during wastcwaler Cl Ilnderllour flush wish under Ilnur vcnlilaliorr
conveyance
Pit recharge points a Agitation of recycled lagoon FJ Exteod recharge litres to near bullum ol'pits
liquid while Ails are filling will► mili-sil►hon VCII15
Lift stations 0 Agitatiou during sump lank ❑ Sump lank covers
filling and drawdown
Outside drain collection • Agiiatiuj► daring wastewater 0 BOX covers `
or junction boxes conveyance
AMOC - November 11. 1996, Page 3

Source
Cause
11MI13 to h ini ubc Odiir Site Sl)ccIIIC I'1'acllces
Elid of diainpilms at
•
Agilaiiun during waslewater
Cl
E.-Mend dlschargc point of pillcs undcl uenill
lagooll
cullvuyallcc
lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces
6
Volatile gas cmissions;
M
Proper lagoon liquid capaeily;
•
Ulologicai mixing;
❑
Collect laguoll slallup plocedilles;
•
Agilaiiolt
M
Minimum surface area-la-voluloe ratio;
M
Mininmin agitation when plmiping;
❑
Mechanical aclaliull;
IN
n
l'Iuven biological additives f Iy 1--eJ4
Irrigation sprinkicr
•
1ligh pressure agllailon;
IN
Ilrigaw oil (try (lays with little or uo Wind;
llU1Ae5
•
Whid brill
01
Miniuuurl lecomillended opmlling plcssillc;
IN
Primp iii(:tke near lagoon liquid sot G1ce;
�Paiiial
1-1
Toni) (mill second -stage laguon
Storage lank or basin
•
miclubial decumpusiliull;
Cl
Ilollum ur midlevel loadilig;
surface
•
Mixing while filling;
❑
Tauk coveis;
•
Agitation whet) clnl)tying
❑
Bashi stnlace orals ul sllllds; -
n
I'I oven biological addntim or OXIdMllS
Sellhllg basin sill face
•
I'ailial microbial decomposition;
❑
(:XlClld (11aillhlpc oullels under11C.1111 Intuit(
•
1111 Illlg 1vilile tilling;
level;
•
Agitation when cinplying
❑
Remove settled sulids regulatiy
Maourc, slurry or sludge
*
Agilatiun wbcn slneading;
❑
soil injecii{lit of siuuylslndges;
spreadct uullcis
0
Volatile gas emissions
-❑
Wash residual nlaniue lium spreader:►Ilcr Ilse;
O
Proven biu[ugical additives or oxidarils
Uncovered 111aIlUfC,
•
Volatile gas Culissiolls while
❑
Soil injeclion of sillily/sludges
slurry or sludge rill licit(
drying
❑
Soil illct11pt11a1ion lvltllill'18 Ills.;
surfaces
-
❑
Spread ill Olin ullllot'rn Iaycls lot. rapid dlyillg;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidauts
(dead auhnals
•
G;lrcass dccumpaslllun
a
I'roper disposillun uI calcasses
Dead auilu,nl dislrusal
•
Carcass rlccurlipusitiun
Ci
Colnll[cte covering uC Cal casses in burial pies;
Ails
❑
Proper lucaliuu/cousillicliun of disposal [)its
Incillemp-,rs
•
incumplele combustion
Cl
Secondary slack burners
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 4

Source Cause IIMI's Io h1iniinize Odor Silc Specific Pricliccs
Slanding walcr around • Improper drainage; O Grade and landscape such that hitter dtinns
ftcililies 0 Microbial decomposiiimt of awry from facilities
organic malier
Manure tracked onto • Poorly mail lained access roads 0 harm access road mahacnauce
public toads from farm
access
Additional lnformalion :
Swinc Man►ire Management ; 0200 I(uIcIBMP Packet
Swine Production Fatm Potenlial Odor Sources and remedies ; EIJAE Fact Sheet
Swine Produclion facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge - Lagouu 'I'rcalincot ; I-DAli 128-88
Swinc Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - l.ngoon'ftrrlmew ; FIIAE 129-88
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Trenlment and Simagc ; E-DAE 103-83
Calibration of M:umre and Waslcwatcr Applicalion Equipment ; 1-HAli pail Sheet
Coittrulling odors from Swinc l3uildings ; I'll l-3a
1?nvironnicnial Assurance Program ; NPl'C Manual
Options for Managing Odor ; a report from the Swine Odor Task force
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Mauagenrcnl: Odors aml Flies ; 11It0107, 1995 Cmillwence I'mccediugs
AMOC - November It, 1996, Page 5
Available from :
NCSU, Coonly Extension Cenler
NCSU - IJAE
NCSU - IIAE
NCSU - IIAI:
NCSU - llAF
NCSU - IIAE
NCSU - Swinc: Exlcusion
NC Pork Producers Assoc
NCSU Agri Cwurnunicaliuns
Florida Cuopelative Iixlellsiolr

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHO,7 I TUINLERS
DWQ � / G Y Y6 - 15 q I
EMERGENCY IMANNAGEMIE`^T SY"STEM 5`y8fq 6 _ ill
SWCD 54i.z - 7 16 3
N-RCS S z - 7 1 k
This plan wild be irnplenented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your proper<y to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are sorne action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Dependil-Ig on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lasoon c%r_:-Llow-possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm, io increase elevation of darn.
b. Pu:;Ia wastes to fields at an acz=. ble rate.
c. Sto;) all flows to the la_,00n Unmediately.
d. Call a n U-nDIng coat: actor.
e. Niati_ sur_ no suL,act water is enterins: laaoon.
B- RUncf= f_orM waste application field -actions include:
a. l=;-_diarely stop waste application.
b. Create a t-zrnpora.-v diversion to contain waste.
c. I-1ccr7_,orate Wasteto ;educe minor].
d. Evaluate and eli1;unate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e_ Eval,_ate the apuiication ratfs for the gelds where runoff occurred.
C. Leati__t "Tom, thz wa5t- pipes and sp rin:` f7-s-action include.
a. Stop r-vC: pump.
I- q,iC ir. __=i1CTi uri^.
c. Closz� vaives to ellrrunait fui-horu15Ci.°r�e.
d. R:-Y=:r all leaks p.-nor to r-zs:ai�In° pumps.
D: iiCi:S flush s}`5it:,as. 1",oL,;es, soli.-sip.-...iC'r5-aCi1Ori Include:
D.
d. SGG7_ l tll� l GidsL, i?9��ii sys:=s. oi-solidseparators.
December IS, 1996

w
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Oft-zn this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a snnall sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. L holes are caused by burrowing animmals, trap or remove anima!s and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Aatrroxim.ately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any da.::age noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does t_he spiII have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters.
E. .are pct»le water wells in danger (eithe. on or off of the property)?
R. low ,.luck reached surface waters?
3: Contact a-.:rot:riate agencies.
a. Du;` nS no=al business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
rezionai office; Phone - - After hours, emergency number. 919-733-39-42.
Your z ihcne call should include: vour na:ne, faciiira, telephone cumber, di -I details
eft e inciCient from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or
d::ccticn of move:-eni of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The cotmcdve
.., asu-es tnat Have been under taken, and the seriousness, of the sit'.i2tion.
b. I spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EYES Phone number -
c. L-isznact=tiIS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES. phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number
anu- --cal MRCS oI`ice for advicelitch--cal assTStancz phone nu:%be: - -
above works call 911 cr the Sr: ..II s D;2pal anent and txpiain you=
rr glee- d ' that o c t?ct the proper agencies for you.
f� t' � :, an asp per s,,h t cr. -
contractor of vcur choice to beCin repati of prcblem to rani:--.ize o:'r-site
a. Contras crs Name: %fir -. C Ii. as
c. Ccr,i-a_:ors A.ci,d-ass:
Dtc_,,,bzr 1 S. 1996

6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the la;oon (3NRCS, Consulting
Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: � u��;5
b. Phone:_ 5Y,—///r ;� -1 !Ly -a
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
December 18. 1996

riYte'r"atctr.ADj
iA11lMS
c: c=u.,-; j.
�P,MPS.l i1•i
''"a ILE.
Distance
to nearest
_"esidar1ce
(04her
Lhari
10
Ttom'e.,
1. STEADY
iAiE L-}a`E
WEIGHT
}
`:
-fCiniS;h
1417
!Lis. _
C)
C
(farr
� fBeer
v
�22'L
Iws k= s
L}
head
(f r'Ii S r
bs -
ti__=_i0
IL=S
+
s c, w a
( f a r r w
;, c= w e a rr
C)
I L= K.
0
ha a
(wean tct
fEE der"%
_;#.i
Ibs. -
�f
ii=
TOTAL
STEADY STATE
LIVE
WG _ GP-.
L-; s ? -
_ �:° :==;C;
I Lt s
._. MlNii=i>_lt<9 F{a=QL i�1-�E:..' TREATMENT 1MEiL'T V1T+1 LiiiE OF I At;i_!f iN
Vo1urne _-:�3C)1! ILts. SSLW :; Treatment Volume(CF)1':tt. S'-)i
Treatment SELW= 1 ::F/ i LELi'ED
Vo I urne c ut= i c f Bet WATERQUALITY SECT ON
. B T !0RAG-E V0LUME F'A_JR SLUD-�E AC-C. UMULAT I + iN 'JUN 1 1 '1998
V o I um e = 0. f_) c Lit. i s f e e t ; "Owner requests n 170�19i iSa•= .jcei �bi7idltlf]Qa a s
Sludge w i I i tie removed as rieedeci.
TOTAL DES: GN VOLUIME
Ins i de top f er1Sth 2:75.0 feet ; I rrs i de t=_=fit w i cith-00.C.i f e e t
Turf of d i F.e at e I evert i con 45.0 feat
Freeboard 1.feet ; Side slopes i ( Inside I a; oon )
Tota I design 4 a-joon l i tau i d E eve I at elevation 4G.7 feet
^cttt_m of I a coon e 1 evert i c=n 33 .Cs Feet
Seasonal high water" table e I evat i c=n _:f_=.0 feet
Tot;a1 des icr1 volume using pr-ismoivai f.:,rmLiIa
SS/END1 SS/ENDS SS/SIDE1 SSISIDE LENGTH
H WIDTIP DEF'TH
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
AREA i_i� BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH( _
:3V �. . G 144U 1- .
70575.8. ( AREA OF TOP)
C:ci7Ci4 .0 ( AREA OF I-:-OTTCiM )
AREA OF IM I DSEC:T I i tN
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
_.'5.1 160.1 �i-1' '-,.Ci (AREA =CiF MIDSEC:TIGN � 4)
C.0 . FT. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA M I DSEGT I i-i1N) + AREA BOTTOM] DEPTH/ 6
7Ci575 . G' 214598. C> C. 0 1 .
VCsLUME OF L,` G0i_ii'4 AT T;_iTAL DESIGN LIQUID LEVEL = 5777'Z5 CU . FT .

DRAINAGE-- NAGE A- 'E-A .
1 tl . r \
L e n 'G ri 3: vL . d 3 . _.
µc[t ater-`,
Square T e e L
T UTAL .;� s _[f_7'7w7. ti' sgLiar-E, � c
De, i �n ; er.-;pur-ar-�y" s uvra.tie Per i tc[ =e _ _:0 days.
Y.. V l= ' Ll rn e c' W M t E' I•= r o [j a[c e =#
A, p p r x i mate da i I y r`ri_,duct i c=r: cif rf, a r, u r e i s`. s- LE: SS-'—W 0. 01-:6.
V 1uwle = 00 Lbs. S.vLIN * CF .0-. Ulaste/Lb ia !80 days
V Ci I ume = ;'"',. -t7 cubic T eet
51D.. Vo I ume of wash 4:ater"
Th i s i s t;-:e amount of fresh water- used fc=r- wash i rig f I oars c[r vc[ I urne
of fresh water- used for a f 1 ush system. I ush systems that r e c i r c u I ate
tI e i a; _ c=r: water are accounted for in 5A.
Vo 1 ume = r=7.C7 �a 1 1 c[ns day _ _ti7 [gays stc[ra?e/7. ._ dal I c[ns
Per- C-.
VoIume = 0.0 CLit. iC feet
Fr-. Vo 1 [urge of ra i n -r a ! ! i n e`Icess of evaE[C,rG. i c,r,
Use per" i c,d of time when ra i nfa I I exceeds evaporation by I argest amount.
ile. ;=7 i;ay.S excesF. ra i n f a I 1 - 7.0 i riches
Vo I ume = 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches Per foot
VC, i ume = 4"37IT, C:. 0 cLib i c feet

~
5D. Volume of 25
year - 24 hour storm
Volume =
7.0 inzhes / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume =
43750.0 cubic feet
70TAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
�
5A' 94947 cubic feet
�
53. O cubic feet
5C' 43750 cubic feet
`
5D. 43750 cubic feat �
TOTAL 1=447 cubic feet
6. SUMnARy
Total required
volume 571247 cubic feet
Total design
volume avail. 577725 cubic feet
Min. req.
treatment volume p|us sludge accumulation
388800 cubic fee
' At elev.
41'0 feet ; Volume is 399168 cubic feet
(end pumping)
Total design
volume less 25yr-24hr storm is 533975 cubic feet
At e|ev.
43'0 feet ; Volume is 529140 cubic feet
(start pumping)
Seasonal
hiSh water ta.b\e elevation 36.0 feet
`
7. DESIGNED BY:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN

.. l
Operator:ADJ FARMS County: SAMPSON Date: -- 12/28/93
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner): 900 feet
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
0
Sows
(farrow to finish)
X
1417
lbs. =
0
0
Sows
(farrow to feeder)
X
522
lbs. =
0
1440
Head
(finishing only)
X
135
lbs. -
194400
0
Sows
(farrow to wean)
X
433
lbs. =
0
0
Head
(wean to feeder)
X
30
lbs. =
0
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = 194400
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 194400 lbs. SSLW X Treatment Volume CF/lb. SSLW
Treatment Volume CF-/lb. SSLW= 1.0 CF/lb. SSLW
Volume = 194400 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION OWNER REQUESTS NO SLUDGE
STORAGE. SLUDGE WILL BE
Volume = 0 cubic feet REMOVED AS NEEDED.
4. TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME
Inside top: length 250 feet ; width 170 feet
Top of dike at elevation 47.00 feet
Freeboard 1.3 feet Side slopes 3.0:1(inside)
Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation 45.70 feet
Bottom of lagoon at elevation 35.00 feet
Seasonal high water table elevation 37.00 feet
Total design volume using prismoidal formula:
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/END2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 242.2 162.2 10.70
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH X WIDTH
242 162
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH X WIDTH =
178 98
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH X WIDTH X 4
210 130
39285 (Area of Top)
17444 (Area of Bottom)
109336 (Area of Midsection X 4)
CU. FT. = [Area top+(4XArea Midsection)+Area Bottom] X Depth/6
39285 109336 17444 2
VOL. OF LAGOON AT TOTAL DESIGN LIQUID LEVEL = 296149 CU. FT.

• ..
5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
Drainage Area:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length X Width =
250 170 42500 Square Feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
Length X Width =
0 0 0 Square Feet
TOTAL DA 42500 Square Feet
Design temporary storage to be 180 days.
A. Volume of waste produced
Approximate daily production of manure in CF/LB SSLW 0.00136
Volume = 194400 Lbs. SSLW X CF of waste/lb/day X 180
Volume = 47589 Cubic feet
B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or
volume of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems
that recirculate the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0 Gallons/day X 180 days storage/7.48
gallons per CF
Volume = 0 Cubic feet
C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by
largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 Inches X DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 24791.667 Cubic feet
D. 'Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.0 inches / 12 inches per foot X DA
Volume = 24792 Cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 47589 Cubic feet
5B. 0 Cubic feet
5C. 24792 Cubic feet
5D. 24792 Cubic feet
TOTAL 97172 Cubic feet

` 0.
6. SUMMARY
r
Total required volume = 291572 Cubic feet
Total design volume avail.= 296149 Cubic feet
Min. reqrd. trtmnt. vol. plus sludge'accum.= 194400 Cu. Ft."
At elev. 43.00 Ft; Vol= 198688 Cubic feet (end pumping)
Total design volume less 25yr-24hr storm = 271357 Cu. Ft.
At elev. 45-.00 Ft; Vol= 269240 Cubic feet (start pumping)
Seasonal high water table elevation is 3--LO Feet, which must
be lower than the elevation of top of treatment volume 43.00
DESIGNED BY:
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
,s-,�J (�?:- V y
DATE: ! --'f - 9)�
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ADDITIONAL NOTES:

..' .
` 4. •
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
------------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) with
minimum odor control. The time required for the planned fluid level
to be reached (permanent + temporary storage) may vary due to
flushing operations and the amount of fresh water to be added to the
system.
The designed 6 months temporary storage is an estimated volume
based on : 1) waste from animals; 2) excess rainfall after
evaporation; and 3) the largest 24 hour (one day) rainfall that
occurs on the average of once every 25 years. The volume of
waste generated from a given number of animals will be fairly
constant throughout the year and from year to year. This
estimate is based on 7 inches of excess rainfall which is
equal to or exceeds the highest 6 months excess in a year.
The average annual excess rainfall is approximately 8 inches.
Therefore, an average of 8 inches of excess rainfall will
need to be pumped each year. The 25 year rainfall will not be a
factor to consider in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage
volume must always be available. A maximum elevation is
determined in each design to begin pumping and this is usually
the outlet invert of pipe(s) from building (s). If the outlet
pipe is not installed on the elevation to begin pumping, a
permanent marker must be installed on this elevation to
indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be
established to stop pumping to maintain minimum treatment depth
(6 feet). Pumping can be started or stopped any time between
these two elevations for operating convenience as site
conditions permit (weather, soils, crop, and equipment to apply
waste without runoff or leaching).
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should
be taken when applying waste to prevent runoff from the field,
or damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended tha the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids
should be covered with effluent at all times. When pre -
charging is completed, flush buildings with recycled lagoon
liquid. Fresh water should not be used for flushing after
initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed.
This plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see
Attachment B) before land application.

JV
qP
3. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches eleva-
tion 45.00 as marked by permanent markers. Stop pump -out
when the fluid level reaches elevation 43.00 or before
fluid depth is less than 6 feet deep (this prevents the loss of
favorable bacteria). The design temporary storage, less 25 year
storm is 72381 cubic feet or 541408 gallons. As stated
before, this volume will vary considerably from year. to year.
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is one
(1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.4
inches per hour.
5. Keep vegetation on embankment and areas adjacent to the lagoon
mowed annually. vegetation should be fertilized as needed to
maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to
stable outlets.
8. Keep a minimum of 100 feet cropland buffer or 25 feet of grass
vegetated buffer around waste utilization fields, particularly adjacent
to ponds, lakes, streams, open ditches, etc. Do not pump within
300 feet of a residence or within 100 feet of a well.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.
NOTES:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Wayne & Ronald Cannady / Jeff Warren
A.D_J. Hog Farm 3-5
1366 Bass Lake Rd
Roseboro NC 28382
Attn: Jeff Warren
Dear Jeff Warren:
mom
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
June 19, 2000
Subject: Application No. AW1820072
Additional Information Request
A.D.J_ Hog Farm 3-5
Animal Waste Operation
Sampson County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by July 19, 2000:
Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) list the Yield for grazed Bermuda on Tract 10527, field 4 as 4.2 tons
per acre. This is higher than information available to the Division of Water Quality suggests.. It appears
that maybe the yields for fields 3 and 4 where accidentally reversed. Please contact your technical specialist
to review the Waste Utilization Plan and provide documentation that supports the yield as shown in the
current WUP or revise the WUP. Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the
owner and the technical specialist
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the ovrner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter, must be
submitted on or before July 19, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
erely,
e Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc. Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% posl-consumer paper

ANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM
Lificate of Coverase or Permit Number C �I Z..?— County Sel T s Year 200
liry Name (as Shawn on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) ADZ pl �, 1f f-ri _5
.razor in Charge for this Facility nu Certification_
,_I application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year
YES NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part H and proceed to the certif cation. Also, if animal waste
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
-t I : Facility Information:
Fotal number of application FieldsZor Pulls ❑ (please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)
z, 3
M
Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
Total number of Fields Lkor Pulls ❑ (please check the appropriate box) on which land application
occurred during the year: Total Acres on which waste was applied _ ^
Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
5, 311 L
Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and
he permit: /6 y
Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater -sold or given to other persons and taken
off site during the year M - t tons ❑ or gallons ❑ '(please check the appropriate box)
Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year.
Largest
'Smallest %. 43 6' �:.�, <
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals
3t the facility is the annual average numbers)
.acility's Integrator if applicable:
t II: Facility Status-
�w , t H,
HE .ANSWER TO ANY STATE-MENT BELOW IS "NO". PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
�CRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
\4PLI_ANCE. AIND E:'LAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TA -KEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
NG THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
'Dale° animal waste generated at this facility was ao_ plied to he permitted sites during , Yes No
fte vast calendar tear.
1CF 3-14-03

Anp_ndi:, 3_ Lagoon Sludge Survec Form
{} 2 , 7�
A. Farm Permit or DWQ Identification. Number t� S
B. Lagoon IdentiftLation .
C. Person(s) taking Measurements +✓�1 �:.�..i
D. Date of Measurements 14 _fit `r
E. Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of:
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer
b_ Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soil) of ]moon:
c. Thickness of the sludge laver if making a direct measurement with "coresampler":
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): /. 72 (acres)
(Draw sketch of lagoon on aseparate sheet and list dimensions, and calculate surface area.)
G. Estimate number of sampling points
a. ' Less than I.33 acre: Use 8 points
b. If more than 1.33 acre, L%2 acres x 6 = , with maximum of 24.
(Using sketch and dimensions, develop a uniform "grid" that has numb�-r of intersection points that match
most closely with the estimated number of sampling points needed. Number the grid intersection points on
the lagoon grid to correspond with the data to be recorded for points of measurement.)
A. Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Sheef',
I. At time of sludge survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level
to.the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gage pole): _
J. Determine distance from Maximum Liquid Level to Minimum Liquid Level: .2. 1
(Determine from Plan or other lagoon records)
K. Calculate distance from present liquid surface level to Minimum Liquid
level: Item d - Item I, assuming present liquid level is below Max. Liq. Level: 1,
L. Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level G
to the lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points): /•
M. Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the top of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points): Sr�
N. Record from siudge survey data sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer;
0. Calculate the thickness of the existing Lj:auid a reatment Zone (Item ltiI - Item K):
]Note: if ]tern 0 is less than 4 ft., a siudge removal and utilization plan may be required by
N. C. DWQ. See vour specific n:rmit w contact DWQ for more information.)
P. Proceed to Sludge Volu-te':vo-i:si eat is nasire io caiouiate siudge vo;urn2 :.or r_c:ar:t_ttiz. shaped
lagoon wltn. linli0 lice 510.7 . C;r pletEd ov: , �. nr: �* Date •Jy1�
-2 � L/
fir:: Name .`.lZnall--e

Appendix 4 Sludae Survey Data Sheet
Lagoon ID ADJ Farms #1 Big 82-72
Completed by Curtis G Barwick ---y Date 3/24/2004
A B C C-B
Grid Pt Dist. To top of sludge Dist to lagoon bottom Thickness of sludge layer
feet(tenth) feet(tenth)
feet(tenth)
1
5.4
8.7
3.3
2
5.4
9.0
3.6
3
5.6
8.7
3.1
4
5.5
9.1
3.6
5
5.5
9.1
3.6
6
5.4
9.2
3.8
7
5.6
9.5
3.9
8
5.4
9.2
3.8
9
5.5
9.0
3.5
10
5.5
8.7
3.2
11
5.4
9.0
3.6
12
5.5
8.8
3.3
13
0.0
0.0
0.0
14
0.0
0.0
0.0
15
0.0
0.0
0.0
16
0.0
0.0
0.0
17
0.0
0.0
0.0
18
0.0
0.0
0.0
19
0.0
20
0.0
21
0.0
22
0.0
23
0.0
24
0.0
AVERAGE
5.5
9.0
3.5

Appendix 3, Lagoon Sludge Survev Form r/
A_ Faun Pe ;nit or DWQ Identification Number_ r) J d � — 72
B. Lagoon Idenuf cation .� .•,.j /j
C. Person(s) raking Measurements C�n.r.
D. Date of Measurements
E. Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of:
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge laver.
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soil) of�goo�,:
_ :a[
c_ Thickness of the sludge layer if making a dirk: measurement with "core sampler":
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank:): , V (acres)
(Draw sketch of lagoon on aseparate sheet and list dimensions, and calculate surface area.)
G. Estimate number of sampling points:
a. ' Less than 1.33 acre: Use 8 points
b. If more than 1.33 acre, acres x 6 = , with maximum of 24.
(Using sketch and dimensions, develop a uniform "grid" that has number of intersection points that match
most closely with the estimated number of sampling points needed. Number the grid intersection points on
the lagoon grid to correspond with the data to be recorded for points ofineasuze rent)
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludg: Su—vey Data Sheet".
L
At time of sludge survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level
to the Present Liquid Level (measure the lagoon
at gage pole):
_ —7
J.
Determine distance from Maximum Liquid Level to Minimum Liquid Level:
(Determine from Plan or other lagoon records)
K.
Calculate distance from present liquid surface level to Minimum Liquid
/ y
level: Item J — Item I, assuming present liquid level is below Max. Liq. Level:
L.
Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
the lagoon bottom for
q
to (average all the measurement points):
/.
M.
Record from sludge survey data sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
Y
to the top cf the sludge laver (average for all the measurement points):
N.
Record from sludge survey data sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer:
3.4
0. Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone (Iterrt M — Item K):
More: 1f lt--m 0 is less ,F.an 4 ft., a sludge removal and milization plan may be required by
N. C. DWQ, Sec your scecilic permit or contact DWQ for more information.)
P. ?mceed tG Sludge ;'olurne YVork5htet if dtslre to caiculate sludge volxnt Ibr rvClanzular shaped
12QodL XIti. u'r1s1Ct si0:)t
,2ZL� vJ , Date
..'li -,am5 fEr:aT1re

Appendix 4
Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Lagoon ID ADJnFarmss #2
Small
82-72
Completed by
Curtis G Barwick / `. �
i ", -
Date 3/24/2004
A
B C
C-B
Grid Pt Dist. To top of sludge Dist to lagoon
bottom
Thickness of sludge layer
feet(tenth) feet(tenth)
feet(tenth)
1
5.6
8.7
3.1
2
5.3
9.6
4.3
3
5.5
9.6
4.1
4
5.7
8.8
3.1
5
5.7
9.5
3.8
6
6.5
9.6
3.1
7
6.0
9.8
3.8
8
5.9
9.7
3.8
9
0.0
0.0
0.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
11
0.0
0.0
0.0
12
0.0
0.0
0.0
13
0.0
0.0
0.0
14
0.0
0.0
0.0
15
0.0
0.0
0.0
16
0.0
0.0
0.0
17
0.0
0.0
0.0
18
0.0
0.0
0.0
19
0.0
20
0.0
21
0.0
22
0.0
23
0.0
24
0.0
AVERAGE
5.8
9.4
3.6

t . . .
COASTAL METAL SERVICE
P.O. Box 128, Goldsboro, N.C. 27533
3
r F
DRI LOU
1 -919-735-1651
1-800-672-3106
1-919-735-9946 FAX
.57
5,4
o
L
4t,
3r
IRTR Y,,CIC@

-�1nMEs.B: Hu
-fir?
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 31, 2000
ADJ Farms, Inc.
Attn.: Jeff Warren
1366 Bass Lake Road
Roseboro, NC 28382
SUBJECT: LAGOON STRUCTURE
ADJ Swine Farm 3-5
Facility No. 82 - 72
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Warren:
On January 3, 2000, the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of
Water Quality received a proposal to address the seeping lagoon at the ADJ 3-5
farm site. The proposal has been reviewed by our office and the following items
should be implemented during and/or after the construction of the interceptor
drain:
1. The installation of this interceptor drain should be supervised directly by a
Professional Engineer to insure the structural integrity of the lagoon.
2. If the condition of the dam changes during or after the construction of the
drain, the Fayetteville Regional Office should be contacted immediately.
3. If for any reason, the system cannot adequately handle the quantity of water
entering the system (due to a component of the system failing or if the actual
volume of water entering the system exceeds the calculated volume) the
Fayetteville Regional Office should be notified immediately.
4. The entire waste management system should be inspected on a daily basis to
prevent any failure.
2 0 I. e
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714 1 SYSTEL BLO• FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PHONE S10-486-1541 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 5096 RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
ADJ Farm
May 3I, 2000
5. The existing ditch should be sampled quarterly for the following parameters and submitted to the
Fayetteville Regional Office:
NO3 -as N Total Ammonia (NH, - as N)
Fecal Coliform
6. The existing ditch should be monitored for a period of one year to verify whether contaminants
have been eliminated. Until this has been determined and approved, the ditch should remain blocked
at all times.
7. A record should be maintained of any amount of water added to the lagoon as a result of the
interceptor drain.
This letter in no way absolves ADJ Farms, Inc. from complying with all State and Federal
regulations. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jeffery Brown
Environmental Engineer
cc: Sue Homewood - Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Central Files - Raleigh
Trent Allen - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Wilson Spencer - Sampson Co. NRCS
Curtis Barwick - Coharie Farms
Art Barnhardt - FRO Groundwater Supervisor

COUNTY:
SAMPSON
QUAD NO:
REPORTTO ;
FRO
COLLECTOR(S)
: BROWWHARNBARDT
DATE:
3118199
TIME:
PURPOSE:
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Regional Ofrcc
BOD 310 mglL
COD High 340 mg1L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 1100ml
Coliforrn: MF Total 31504 1100ml
IOC mgA
Turbitity NTU
Residue., Suspended 530 mg/L
Total Suspended solids mg/L
PH units
Alkalinity to pl 14.5 mg/I,
Alkalinity to pl1 0.3 mg/L
Carbonate mg/L
Bicarbonate mgR-
Cubon diXde mglL
Chloride mg/L
Chromium_ I-1es 1032 ugf1,
Color: True K c U.
Cyanide 720 nrg/h
COMMENTS :
Q«ner
1,ocalion or Site:
Description of sampling paint
Sampling Method:
Remarks
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboralary Report / Ground N'aler Quality
SAMPLE PRIORITY
3ROUTINE EMERGENCY
CHAIN OFCUS'fODV ❑
WW SAMPLETYPE, 3
AUJ FARNWARM 3-5
Diss. Solids 70300
mWL
Fluoride 951
no L,
I ludnessl total 900
mg(l,
Hardness: (nan•carb) 902
mg/L
Phetsols 32730
ug1L
Specific Cond. 95
umhoslcm2
Sulfate
mg/L
Sul fide 745
mglL
61 BAS
mg/L
Oil and Grcasc
mg/L
Silica
mg/L
Braun
Formaldehyde
mg/L
Y
NIDasN610
0.04
mg/L
T KN as N 625
0.3
mg1L
X
NO2 +NO3 as n 630
0.48
mg/L
X
P: Total as P 665
0,03
mg1L
rV4
mg/L
Ag-Silver 46566 ug/L
Al -Aluminum 46537 ugn,
As -Arsenic 46551 ug/L
Ba-Barium 46559 uglL.
Ca -Calcium 46552 mg(L
Cd-Cadum 46559 ug/L
CT -Chromium 46560 uglL
Cu- Copper 1042 ug/L
Fe- Iron 1045 ug1L
I Ig- Mercury 71900 uglL
K-Potassium 46555 mg1L
Mg- Magnesium 927 myl,
Mn-hlangancsc 1055 ug/L
Ns- Sodium 92R mg/L
Ni-Nickel ug/L
Pb-Lead 46564 ug/L
Se -Selenium ug/L
%n Lioc 46567 ug/L
Lab Number 9GO605
Date Received 3119199
Time Received : 9i35
Received By DS
Released By DS
Date reported ; 41&99
Organochlorine Pesticides --
Organophocphorus Pesticides
WIMIZen Pesticides
1 I Acid Herbicides I
Gasoline
bottle)
RECE"IVED
APR 1 2 1999
FAYETTEVILLE
REG. OFFICE
90a9as.MCM

VJAtL'Y.iti ',' North Carolina
Idapartment of Environment, Health. end Natural Resources
�#� FIELD/LAB FORM
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - GROUNDWATER SECTION
Count SAMPLE LYPE SAMPLE PRIORITY_
Qua o sq,04,71W., Serial No. Water Routine
[� Soil [Emergency
Lat. Long. ❑ Other
Report To: AROjS)� MRO, RRO,•WaRO, WiRO, .® Chain of Custody
WSRO, Kinston FO, Fed. Trust, Central Off., Other: 3
Shipped by: Bus, C—ourt-191, Hand Del., Other•
Lab Number
Dale Receiv
Time
Rec'd by:_.. From: Bus ouri Hand Del.,
Other:
Data Entry By: Ck:
Date Reported:
Purpose:
Collector(sj: Date ~ (� "�<<l Time t D rt� 1tnE _ Baseline, Complaint, Compliance,,LcUST. Pesticide Study, Federal Trus lher:
FIELD AN-ALY;kS Owner - - @DT- F=�4l�W � ,�F� _� S
pH400 Spec. Cond.94 at 250 C
Temp.,, oC Odor
Appearance
Field Analysis By:
Location or site
Description of sampling point .1„a { MWLM Dwm
Sampling Method `_r"t_. T _ Sample Interval
Remarks _..
UUT4 V lk*, u, lamp. W.)
Lab Comments:.
GW-54 REV. UN For Dissolved Analysis - submit lillered sample and Write "DIS" In bloc',

--------------
-s4
e--3 �
it
cf L Y117V�16-1
�14
1-0
ov"
� sty � 5
at If-P
C?y
zogo
C11 0

__� —� 4 � F ���,� Ali,, s �� �
--- — - - -- _ _ _ _ _ _sf _ _ _l-c, - � � y e �
--r----�
---- - - � 3 I _ `- � �
--
---
t � - --
��� S �„�
_____��
,�i � �
,j ',[' �
,,
__� _ _ � _ _�_'-���3�_-�C� __ _�_f�tc -E'er..--- -1�S � --� � - `� ,�/��
_ _ °�- - {f-_- �—
___

eack
December 30, 1999
ADJ Farms, Inc.
1366 Bass Lake Road
Roseboro, NC 28382
North Carolina Department of Environment
And Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Attn: Jeffrey Brown
225 Green Street
Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Reference: ADJ 3-5 Lagoon Remediation
Dear Mr. Brown:
RECEj6VED
FA`Y,—: n-EVILLE
REG. OFFICE
We would like to submit this report to the Division of Water Quality
Fayetteville Regional Office for review and approval. Enclosed is a copy of a
design report and drawings for our recommended corrective action to address
the seepage from the referenced lagoon. We have proposed to install one
perforated drain in a porous trench, approximately parallel and at the base of
dike toe on the east side. Based on site conditions, cost constraints, and
detailed on -site drainage analysis, we believe this to be the most viable solution
for minimizing further risk of surface water contamination.
As all partied involved are aware, it is difficult to determine the source of
contaminants, but previous testing indicated that drainage ditch contaminants,
both microbial and nutrients, probably came from lagoon seepage. Our
investigation concluded that earlier contaminant movement into the drainage
ditch was by surface breakout of the seepage into the identified low ponding
area, and the contaminants were then transported by surface runoff during wet
periods. By intercepting the seepage at the base of the dike, we feel the
seepage will be controlled and returned into the lagoon.
ADJ Farms would like to thank you and the department for your patience
concerning this matter. Please inform us of your decision. I can be reached by
phone at [phone] if any questions arise.
Sincerely,
/JeffZarren
Secretary, Treasurer

PROPOSED REMEDIATION FOR SWINE
ANAEROBIC LAGOON SEEPAGE
FOR
ADJ FARMS, INC. SITE 3-5
ROSEBORO, NC
PREPARED FOR:
ADJ Farms, Inc.
1366 Bass Lake Road
Roseboro, NC 28382
PREPARED BY:
R. Gregory Swain, P.E.
Swain Consulting Services, Inc.
503 Underwood Street
Clinton, NC 28328
[phone]
Seal
SEAL
164I6
RECEN
q 3 2000
FAYETTEVILLE
REG. OFFICE
r
/2- /'v- /7 ? --
!Signature Date

1. INTRODUCTION
Swain Consulting Services, Inc. (SCSI) was contacted by Mr. Jeff Warren of ADJ Farms, Inc. to
investigate and propose a remedial plan to eliminate surface water contamination resulting from seepage
from an anaerobic swine waste treatment lagoon. The subject site is located on Bass Lake Road in
Sampson County, North Carolina.
In May of 1998, the Division of Soil and Water Conservation noted a suspected seepage at the toe of the
lagoon dike. Further investigation and testing by NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) personnel verified that seepage from the lagoon was entering an
adjacent drainage ditch, allowing for off -site transport of wastewater. DWQ requested a plan to correct
the discovered deficiency.
ADJ Farms took measures immediately to prevent off -site transport of the seepage, which was isolated to
a small, low area. A berm was constructed along the lagoon side of the ditch, and the downstream end of
the ditch was dammed to prevent flow, with collected water being intermittently pumped into the lagoon
as required. ADJ contracted with a geotechnical consulting firm to investigate the existing conditions and
propose a solution to overcome the seepage discharge.
The geotechnical consultant submitted a report indicating that the lagoon structure is structurally stable,
and the materials in the suspect dike were found to be generally well compacted and consistent.
Recommendation at that time was to install a "blanket drain" system consisting of a series of 6"drainlines
running perpendicular to the toe of the lagoon and collecting into a header pipe, which would then
discharge into a collection sump tank. This proposal was rejected by DWQ.
After preliminary review of site conditions and previous proposals, SCSI contracted Dwayne Graham of
Graham Environmental Consulting, Inc. (GECI) to further analyze the soils and drainage patterns in the
problem area. The report, entitled "SOIL AND SITE EVALUATION, DRAINAGE ANALYSIS
REPORT" is included as Appendix B and is considered a part of this design report.
2. SITE CONDITIONS
Based on site observations and conclusions by GECI, the contamination in the drainage ditch adjacent to,
and running parallel with, the lagoon was primarily a result of surface runoff rather than subsurface flow
from the lagoon. The detected seepage appears to occur in a limited area of the lagoon dike, and surface
breakout of the seepage takes place during periods of high seasonal water table. Based on the GECI
findings of slowly permeable soils with low flow velocities in the subject area, there should be minimal
subsurface impact on the drainage ditch water from seepage water.
3. DESIGN RECONIN ENDATIONS
Based on conclusions drawn from field observations and drainage analyses conducted by GECI, SCSI
recommends installing a subsurface interceptor drain along the toe of the eastern dike. The drain should
begin at the southeastern corner and run approximately 200 feet long. The lowest area downslope of the
dike, which is the area subject to ponding and surface breakout of seepage, is approximately 120 feet
north of the southeast corner, and 200 feet of drain extends beyond any suspected seepage area (See Page
1, Appendix A). Based on field drainage data and corresponding groundwater modeling, GECI estimated
that an area 40 feet by 140 feet would generate approximately 22.4 cubic feet per day seepage volume.
This estimate will be used as a design collection volume.
2

The elevation of the drain shall be installed according to the plans, and shall be set below the lagoon
bottom elevation (approximately 34.9', based on Benchmark 50.0' high end building pad) and below the
ponding surface elevation (32.7'). By setting the elevation at this level, any lateral flow toward the
adjacent ditch should be intercepted by the installed drain, minimizing the risk of further wastewater flow
into the ditch, either by subsurface flow or by surface flow following surface breakout of seeping
wastewater.
3.1 Drain Design
A trench should be excavated in the location designated by the engineer; generally, the trench shall begin
at the southeastern corner slightly downslope from the toe of the constructed lagoon dike, and shall
continue parallel to the dike for 200 feet. Trench shall be excavated to a minimum width to effectively
install the drain system, approximately 24-30" wide. Excavation shall be to an elevation of 32.0 feet at
the beginning of trench (southeast corner of lagoon) and shall have a fall of 0.5% to the discharge, or 12"
fall in the 200' drain.
The drainpipe shall be 6" perforated HDPE corrugated pipe, installed with sock filter. Trench should be
backfilled with 4" of standard course aggregate, such as number 3, 4, 5, 57, or 6 of ASTM Standard D-
448. The drainpipe with fabric sock shall be placed over the center of the trench, and a minimum of an
additional 18" of aggregate should be carefully placed around and over the drainpipe. The balance of the
excavated trench should be filled with excavated material, preferably the least permeable material
available to minimize rainwater infiltration into the drainage system (See Page 2, Appendix A for typical
cross-section of drainage trench).
The 6" pipe shall discharge into a collection tank as detailed below. The area of entry into the tank shall
be properly sealed after pipe installation to prevent groundwater seepage into the tank.
3.2 Collection pump Tank
All collected seepage shall flow from the 6" drainpipe into a minimum 900 gallon concrete sump tank,
installed at the north end of the drainline. Tank shall be installed to allow discharge as near the top of the
tank as possible to maximize storage volume. The tank shall be installed with lift pump, valve assembly,
and float and alarm system similar to wastewater effluent pump tank requirements (see detail, Page 3 of
Appendix A). The pump shall be a Myers Model ME40 or equal, capable of pumping 20 gallons per
minute at a total dynamic head of approximately 45 feet. Collected water is to be pumped back into the
adjacent wastewater lagoon by means of a 2" flexible hose. Hose shall be extended to discharge at the
liquid surface to prevent scouring of lagoon liner material in inside surface.
The tank shall be equipped as shown in Figure 3 of Appendix A, including pump on/offfloat, high water
alarm float, disconnect valves, check valve, pump retrieval rope or chain, and the tank shall be accessible
by a prefabricated manhole riser and lid. The pump shall be wired to a control panel Myers Model
#MW50 or equal, equipped for 230v single phase power. The control panel shall be equipped with the
options and features specified on the "PANEL OPTIONS" worksheet in Appendix A. Specifically, the
control panel is to include both a flashing alarm light and an alarm horn to warn of high water level in the
tank. The pump should also be equipped with a run-time meter as a means to approximate the volume of
water returned to the lagoon.

3.3 Erosion Control
All areas disturbed during the above described installation shall be fine graded and seeded with a
grass/small grain mixture, to be determined based on season work is conducted. Seeding shall take place
as quickly as possible after drainline and pump tank installation.
4. ADEQUACY OF DESIGN
Based on estimated seepage cal Iection of 22.4 cubic feet per day (168 gpd), and a start pumping elevation
approximately 1 /3 of the total tank capacity of 900 gallons, the tank has a maximum retention of
approximately 3.5 days before overflowing. With the alarm systems specified, this should prevent pump
failure from allowing an overflow and subsequent discharge of collected seepage with proper
management of the system.
The lagoon is currently designed for 180 days of temporary storage. The original lagoon design required
a total volume of 571,247 cubic feet, and the actual design volume was 577,725 cubic feet, for an excess
capacity of 6,478 cubic feet_ Therefore, the lagoon capacity permits up to 36 cubic feet per day additional
input for 180 days, without exceeding the design limits, equating to a 60% safety factor in design input
(compared with 22.4 cu.ft./day. However, if the volume of water collected and pumped into the lagoon
dramatically exceeds 36 cu.ft./day, the engineer shall be notified to modify the design such that water is
irrigated onto an adjacent sprayfield which is not included in the existing waste management plan.
5. MONITORING AND FURTHER SM IMPROVEMENTS
It is recommended that no further site improvements be conducted initially after installing the drainage
collection system. By maintaining the existing conditions, including the berming and damming of the
adjacent drainage ditch and not disturbing the low area with poor drainage, a more accurate assessment
can be made of the efficacy of the installed drainage system.
Management should also keep a weekly log of pump run time, and log the gallons pumped per week
based on pump run time and calibrated pumping capacity (gpm).
It is recommended that AD1 monitor the standing water in the ditch monthly for a period of 6 months to
verify that movement of contaminated water into the ditch has been corrected. Samples should be taken
adjacent to the lowest area of identified ponding, and at the north end of the ditch near the dam. Samples
should be analyzed minimally for fecal coliform count and nitrate nitrogen.
If samples indicate to the satisfaction of DWQ after six months that the installed corrective remedy is
successfully intercepting the seeping wastewater, the following recommendations should be considered:
1) The entire area between the lagoon dike fill and the adjacent ditch should be graded to
eliminate any ponding areas, and to accommodate positive surface flow of precipitation to the
ditch.
2) The adjacent ditch should be re -opened to allow off -site flow, and the ditch should be cleaned
and re -graded for optimum flow.
4

APPENDIX A
1. SITE PLAN
2. DRAIN CROSS-SECTION
3. PUMP TANK CROSS-SECTION
PUMP AND CONTROL PANEL DETAILS
APPENDIX B
GRAHAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC.
SOIL AND SITE EVALUATION
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS REPORT

m
of
SEAL
15 e
SM ELEV, 50.0' 0 UPPER CONC. PAD
LAGOON
X 34.9 eTll ELEV.
#1
NOTE: LAGOON DIKE ELEVATIONS BELOW 46.9'
SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THIS ELEV. AND RESEEDED
R 47.0 947.3 LJ1VuuIV LJIf\C X14u
2' LAY FLAT FLEX HOSE. EXMNOED OVER DIKE
AND TO WATER SURFACE
BEGIN DR1UNME TFENCHAT TOE OF dl� i!
EXCAVATE TO 32.0. SLOPE O.5Z TO CO N TANK
11 I TOE OF DIKE
INSTALL DRAINTILE AS SHOWN IN
DETAIL TO INTERCEPT SEEPAGE FROM
LAGOON AND PUMP BACK.
� ONINO LA
COLLECTION AND
PUMP TANK (SEE DETAIL)
TYPICAL FLOW OF DRAINAGE DITCH WATER OFFSITE
(DITCH PRESENTLY DAMMED TO PREVENT OFF —SITE FLOW)
K TO PREVENT SURFACE FLOW INTO
BERM BUILT ALONGow DITCH Up. N >pa
DRAINA9EOITCH I CIAIAIAI innp►ICI II TIAIh CCO111nCC IAL,
r

6" PERFORATED
DRAIN PIPE W/
FABRIC SOCK
—ELEV. 32.0
HIGH END
EXCAVATE APPRDX
30' TRENCH
BACKFILL W/ MOST IMPERMEABLE
r";�EXCAVATED MATERIAL TO PREV. GRADE
EXISTING UNDISTURBED EARTH
LUZ
Ill IlljT��J1=� Ll
oN 04
7T�T r'1 rr�a SAG°
TYPICAL DRAINPIPE TRENCH CROSS ---SECTION
ADD MIN. ADDITIONAL 18' GRAVEL
AFTER INSTALLING DRAINPIPE
DRAINPIPE ON 4' GRAVEL

UNDERGROUND CABLE IN
CONDUIT TO CONTROL PNL
him
6" DRAINPIPE DISCHARGE
NT
MANHOLE RISER
ELECT. & CTRL WIRING
rt.•-,w,--gym— � � � �
a•
a�
SUBMERSIBLE
--� EFFLUENT PUMP
4" CEMENT BLOCK
av
o-
COLLECTION AND PUMP TANK DETAIL
FLEX HOSE
TO LAGOON
QUICK —
CONNECT
\-2" SCH40 PVC
-GATE VALVE
-THREADED UNION
C ECK VALVE
3�i 6" SIPHON BREAK
LOCKING STRAPS AROUND
CORDS
ALARM FLOAT, SET AT
40" ABOVE TANK BTM.
"PUMP ON" FLOAT, SET
32" ABOVE TANK BTM.
'PUMP OFF" FLOAT, SET
24' ABOVE TANK BTM
1 L I 1 C . - ■
t
f-2_//otlg�

12/03/99 11:31 FAX
Q 003
Double Seal
Single Seal
iHE MYERS ME SERIES EFFLUENT PUMPS ARE
DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR TODAY S EFFLUENT
PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION MOUNDS, TRENCHES AND
HIGH FLOW DRAINAGE APPLICATIONS. The ME Series
effluent pumps with thetr efficient two vane, enclosed
impellers, provide the ideal performance for optimum
dosing. ME Series pumps are con-structed of only
corrosion resistant materials like cast iron, stainless
steel and thermoplastics to assure that they will per-
form for years to come in the harsh effluent environ-
ment and drainage applications. For more informa-
tion, CaD your Myers distributor today or the Myers
Ashland, Ohio sales office at 4191289-1144.
ADVANTAGES BY DESIGN
IDEAL FOR USE IN MOUND AND TRENCH PRESSURE
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS
■ High efficiency, two vane, enclosed impeller pro-
vides ideal performance for most efficient dostng.
■ Impeller passes full -V4 inch solids.
■ Enclosed impeller design eliminates possibility of
Jamming or corrosion between impeller and volute.
ME SERIES
1/2 through 1-1/2 HP
Effluent Pumps
DURABLE MOTOR WILL DELNEB MANY YEARS OF
RELIABLE SERVICE
■ Oil -filled motor for mauirnum heat dissipation and
constant beciring lubrication.
■ High torque, permanent split capacitor (PSG,
single phase motors. No starting switches or
relays to wear out.
■ Optional seal leak probe warns of seal leak
condition. (Dual seal motors only.) Helps prevent
costly motor damage.
■ Motors have on winding current and temperature
sensitive overload. (Single phase only.)
THE MB SERIES EMArENT PUMPS ARE DESIGNED FOR
YEAS OF MAINTENANCE FREE OPERATION
■ Volute seal ring is replaceable. Restores pump to
original performance if wear should occur.
■ Motor is held in place by 4 screws. Easily re-
moved if service is ever needed.
PRODUCT CAPAILITIES
Ca cities 1b _
E 120 GPM
454 LPM
i Heads rb
95 (1,
28.9 m
M S her:cal soL'ds
_
Y. in-
19 mm
M Liquids Handling _
Intermittent Liquid Temp-
derr.esti eeltl-gent & Waln water
up to 141r F , up to Or C
Molar Electrical Data
l 1/2 Hell 5 volts, 1 ph
t1+ 112 to 1-112 HP 230 volts, I ph
208. 230. 460.575 volts, 3 ph
oil -filled, permoneni split caWcY-
tor type. 1 put. 3450 rpm. 601iz
Mptor 1: sulatlon
Class 8 I3Er Q
Third PartvApp:ovals
UL, CSA
Acceptable pH Range
Speeltic Gravity
vtscostty
Discharge. NPT
Dto. s ppleu
_
6-9
.9-1.1
28-35 S5U
2 1n. J-06
.8a91iSUmp
j 3 In. 91i4
f
Constntclten Materials
Motor Housing, Volule
cast iron. Class 30, ASTM A48-76
Enckned 'Two Vane
Impeller Standard
ltorial
engineered thermoplastic
bronze
Impeller -Near Ring
304 SST
Volute sealing R1ng
Suna-N
414 55f
Powu
Power Cord
1/2 HE 1 Ph
314 - 1•if2 YY 1 Ph
All 3 Ph
{ 20It. W3 MWISIOW-A
J 20 it. 1413 S.IOWIS.IOW A
120 it. IN4 SOwISOw-A
Shalt seas Standard
optional
Opt. lower
single corbon & ceramic
tandem carbon & ceramic
lungsten carbide
Posteners
1300 series SST
WHERE INNOVATION 1MMEM TRADITION
ISO 9001 Certified Company

1S
ME40 Series SO
4/10 HP Effluent and Drain Water Pumps
TWO VAHs EM30 L= DRUM PROVIDES KAZERIIIi DOSDM
znr= rCT r
• Enclosed design for high efficiency pumping.
■ Eliminates possibility of jamming between impeller and
volute.
■ Passes a full 3/4 inch solid-
s Original performance can be restored if wean occurs by
replacing volute seat ring.
■ UL CSA. and SSPMA listed.
DURABLE MOTOR WILL DEL1 M MANY YEARS OF
2ZUABLESEMCL
■ Oil -filled motor for maximum heat dissipation and
continuous bearing lubrication.
■ Overload protected shaded pole motor eliminates stinting
switches and relays which are prone to fail.
■ Positive sealing. quick connect float and switch cords
make replacement simple if service is ever necessary.
■Field tested wide angle, mercury -free mechanical float
switch provides mardmum draw down. (Automatic models
only.)
PWDUCT C"ABH=S
C mpadiLes To
80 GPM
3031PM
Beads To
32 tL
9.75 m
NrmtlmtmlSphrrria= Sa11ds
3/4 Ln.
19 min
liquids Hamd4ng
domestic efHuenf 3 dram water
h teq'mllient Uquid Temp,
up to 14rrF I up to W-C
Mat m £iectlral Data
4/10 hp, 160 rpm
shaded poie- ail-=ff -d
115 volts 11.E amps 1 p1160 Hs
230 molts, 54 mnps, 1 ph. 60 Rx
Third Party ApWavrals
UL CSA
A=mptable pH age
6.9
SpecUte Gravity
.9-1.1
Verity
28-35 SSi
Ditcharye. NPT
1-1/2 in
38.1 min
Mirr. Dimp Dim siurplei<
Iluplerc
24 trL
36 [n
61D cm
91.4 cm
PEMR MCE CUM
NEMESES
.■M■■■...■
ME Series (9) G-
1/Z through 1-1/2 HP E Zuent Pumps
IDEA. FOR toss DI MOMIDACID TRE,Ice PRISSURE
DxT1 =UTzou spomm
■ High efficiency, two vane, enclosed impeller provides ideal
performance for efficient dosing.
■ Impeller passes full 3/4 inch solids.
■ Enclosed impeller design elimirmtes possibility of jamming
or corrosion between impeller and volute.
■ UL CSA and SSPMA listed.
DURABLE MOTOR WILL DEWEQ NAM TEARS OF
RZ r�AB Q gERVCg
■ Oililled motor for mom mum heat dissipation and constant
bearing lubrication.
■ High torque, permanent split capacitor (PSC), single phase
motors. No starting switches or relays to wear out
■ Optional seal leak probe warns of seal leak condition. (Dual
seal motors only.) Helps prevent Costly motor damage.
■ Motors have a winding current and temperature sensitive
overload (Single phase only.)
• Volute seal ring is replaceable. Restores pump to original
performance if wear ring should occur.
• Motor is held in place by 4 screws. Easily removed if service
is ever needed
PWDUM CAPAHII.nw
Capadtllm To
120 GPM
4% EPM
Heads To
98 t<
29,8 m
Min. Spherical Solids
3/4 to
19 min
ligrrids Homing
dance MHuetrt k drahr walar
Irrte ent ]Sgrud Temp.
up to 140TF I up 10 61rC
llrobr 17acbJan1 Data
1/2 hp, 115 voff: 1 ph -
1/2 to 1-1/2 hp. 230 vad% I ph
205, 23a 464 575 vafti 3 ph
094i11e4 pa--erd spUt capacitor
type, l piL 345i1 rpm. 66 Fa
Maku Insulation
C1= B (13vq
Third party Appra-als
UL. CM
b pH Rage
sn
spedf= Gravity
.4-1.1
V10-51ty
28.35 SSO
Dlachcnge.l4Pr
2 la
sae min
Mira Sump Dim SYmpbm
Duplex
24 to
36UL
61A roe
91A

a z"3/99 1 1 : 32 FAX
91004
POWER CORD
Jackel sealed with com-
pression fittings. Individual
wires putted with epoxy to
prevent wicking in case of
Cord damage.
0
ENCLOSED TWO VANE
IMPELLER
high efficiency. Passes
I/; spherical solids with
sfalnless steel wear ring.
Optional bronze construc-
lion available.
MOTOR HOUSING
Cast iron for elticlenl
heal transler and
corrosion resistance.
BEARINGS
Upper and lower ball
support rotor. Take
radlal and thrust loads.
MOTOR
112.314,1and1-IMV?
single or three phase.
6011z. 345Q RPM. Single
phase PSC motors have
built -In on winding
overload. protection, oil -
cooled and lubricated.
HIGH EFFICIENCY CAST
IRON VOLUTE
Corrosion resistant. Passes �
'/a` spherical solids. 2' NPT
discharge,
VOLUTE11UPELLER SEAL'
RING
Maintains high efficiency
and reduces recirculation.
Replaceable.
SHAFT SEAL(S)
Carbon and cerarnic tac
Optional dual tandem
seais. Extends rnotor life.
SEAL LEAK PROBES
Optional probes (dual
sea] only) detect water
;eakage in seal housing.
Activales warning light.
ME SERIES
112 through 1- 1/2 HP
Effluent Pumps
DIMENSIONS
f - -
M0< e1 SerteS
MESOS
[TkCtkM
(mllhffketers)_
A
16.8
(427)
18.6
(472)
} B
4.09
(104)
C
1.03
(26)
F
12.13
(305)
ls6r50l�
-- —
4-vQ
(104)
1-03
(26)
12.13
(305)
ME755. MEIMS. ME1505
16.8
(427)
4.0
(I=
1.06
(27)
12.5
316)
_
ME75D, MEIOQiJ. M[E15617
]9.6
4.0
(ICa)
I.Ob
(27)8)
.5(472,
J321
PERFORMANCE CURVE
@~ITT LrMW PM K IMIM
a so ,eo 1W mo a Ion Sao "0 .5a
100
.o
m
2 �
.O
m
m
SO
O
MTi.iC+H Lff-1
1 -10 — ,{W
CAPACITY wllas PER 1lnarrE
AN
t.
K3320 7f97 F. E. Myers, 1101 Myers Parkway. AshkvW. Ohio 44805-1969
Printed in U.S.A. 419/289-1144, FAX: [phone]&%
www.industry. netfte.myer9
Myoos (Canada), 269 Tnllirpn Drive. Kdehener, onla6D N2G 4W5
519/749-5470, FAX: 519f748-2653

3/4" Solids Handling Effluent Pumps
ME40
1 Ye" Discharge, 1E Vs" Pape
PIPE
LERGTH
FEET
GPM
VERTICAL HEAD FEET
5
1 10
1 15
20
25
127
30
100
1 50
42
1 35
28
20
12
200
37
32
28
22
15
10
5
300
32
24
21
18
12
8
4
400
27
23
20
16
11
6
600
23
21
18
13
10
5
800
21
79
16
12
8
4
1000
19
1 17
1 151
11
7
13
1500
15
1 14
1 12
1 10
6
ME50
2" Discharge, 2" Pipe
ME40
W Dischaffl. 2" Pipe
PIPE
GPM
VERTICAL HEAD FEET
5
10
15
20
25
x7
30
_FEET
70r-.
_654:
57
487
37-,-,
200
58
50
42
1 32
20
14
5
300
49
42
35
28
18
12
4
400
44
39
32
26
17
11
4
500
41
36
31
23
16
11
3
600
38
33
28
22
15
10
800
33
31
26
20
12
8
1000
31
26
23
18
1 11
7
1500
27
21
20
16
10
6
2000
22
20
16
12
9
5
PIPE
LENGTH
FEET
GPM
VERTICAL HEAD FEET
10
20
1 30
1 35
140
1 45
50
100
79
69
58
51
42
1 321
19
200
70
61
50
43
35
26
12
3W
65
57
46
40
31
23
11
400
60
52
44
39
30
22
10
500
55
49
40
34
28
20
9
600
52
46
38
32
27
19
8
700
50
44
36
31
24
18
7
800
49
42
33
30
23
17
6
1000
43
38
31
27
21
16
4
12W
41
37
30
23
20
13
15M
37
34
25
22
19
12
2000
32
28
22
19
15
11
NOTE: Do not size pump to right of heavy black line if liquid being pumped contains solids.
All Charts include: 1 Check Valve, 1 Gate Valve, 5 Elbows, and PVC Pipe SDR21 (C=150)
1.1

n
MYERS SIZING TABLES
WeWAK
mL W-WIL .rFM
LAYOUT SKETCH
RECOMMENDED BASIN DIAMETERS
=
,
y■ENEM
ME
i■■■■■
MEN■
i■■■■
No
0
N"mm
MOMMEMEM
MOMMEMMEMMINKAMENEW
E
MMIMMMEMEM
UNINIMMIMENEW
OMMIiMiME�■
IliiW■■//■
m
ii■//■
IL//■
NEEMMINIM
�M
.�,
ii�//,
MMiiiIL/
Select M wnxn � DePoh A elm 21h IL of BMW
000h inGail-
Fww capawy in Gm.
VELOCM AND HEAD LOSS CHART FOR SDR-M PIPE (FloW COa~lftan! Ca1W)
a�s��©®�©osa■
o■v�mo�amm�I■rr�I•ml�rrrmr■��■r
:dom■r�ao�rmmmr�■me.�rr■r■■��■■�I.■r
©maom®®mmr�■rr�m■■�mrr
o�slsl�mo�a®��mr■■rr�r��■mr�rr
��m■�aoa�s�rsammrs•■I•�Ir�rmm■■■■�
®momam
®m®marr■mm�■rm■�■�r
,o®®a��am�as�Qm©m®�m�m■�r�■
omma�mmo®m®■�®©r■m�r�■rr■�
®1ummumamommsEms
mmr■��■�■r
mmma�m��amm■om®■I�m®®■s,�■�
r
©s•r�r�7Ft'��i�7s�E��m���s•�I•
�r�r�rm
1 7mm71mxmmmE
K=
7r�
�����I•�I•s•r�It�3�ImiS�7�E7ml:'7
i0�����������I•�T1�l�
�DEf
loan
N=s�7®
EEMwrfmzz
l ne veiwi In tfwee cnzM are htaed on tha aver, ntertil ftnoter of the pipe. m. lormufa V-<YA end the HEEW-Mftmy fommie-
V Vdoe$y in R.Mm. M - Nmd fun In FL per 100 FL of Pipe 0 - Flow in GPM • Mh GPM & VekirAy Per Pipe Sae far Liquids Conukdnp Sc6de.

. — Vj , W. 11:30 FAX
Q002
Dec Oh 39 10: 31 a Hmon 1-704-821-0548 P.2
PANU.1, OPTIONS
QUOTE it
Silliplex_X l')uplcx
JOB
[lower Service
I lorsepowe'r
Model
x............ Nemn 4X, FlIberghm Evelo""'
AP ........... -Newm 31tSteell Fncloxure
....... Nema 812ingem'sitel Faclogurr
Ited Alarm I.Affbi
0
I'lasking Alarm LW
0 .......... ­ Ctwrsled Alarm Light
4) .............No Able Alarwo
0 ............. Alarin Bell
)< .......... .Alarm 11orm
0 .............Alarm Ilu"�"
JK ........... I-114th tt, 'Olence sterol 07-
............. Flecitavir Alternator
OL ........ ....rurnai Rectomechaniml Alternator
K .... ....... Sepmrate Control CIrCIRRIC11
)< ...... —.111, Label
............. FV,"V%-d Plates
0..........—Lightning Arrestor
to ............. G Fe I Convenleace Ontlrt
0 .............oil Tight Lights & Switches
11........... I-Volgiage Monitor
............. I niflosk-ally We Relays
o ............. t.eperajor Transfer Switch A Illog
..... Auxulpry Cantactn
.............Auto INalen v/ Battery
0 ............. Elapsed Time Meter(i)
0 ............. Cycle ConAlcm
0 .............2.4 hour Timer
(I ............ e4c,
11............. Mrs"s Starteft
Yk ........... wc RIOT-1ces
() .............. Stal Fall URbis
11 ............. Additkmal Indics4or URbis
P< .......... IIOA Svvllclm,.q
3K ............ Can" Trvaalbrnzer� 120V 24 V
0 .............Inner Wor
o .............. Spectal lakbestillage.-t_
0 ............. Cockdepwalt Ileaterwi Thermo
to, ............. Is"Mis Ochry Relay(s)
4) .............Low Level Alarm
0- ........... Additional Option(s)
0._ ......... I,C*d Pump Select
Nnic- Our Mt. of options is based qwst the information Mal we have received with this quote
request. Should additional stom or Information W received In The future, our fist ofoIAhw!t stmve
would need in he rryked with a correspawflug Intresse/ decrease In ibe quoted price.

SOIL AND SITE EVALUATION
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS REPORT
FOR
ADJ FARMS, INC.-LAGOON SITE AT ADJ-315 FARM
Clinton, NC -Sampson County
PREPARED FOR:
Mr. Greg Swain, PE
Swain Consulting, Inc.
Clinton, N.C.
PREPARED BY:
DWAYNE A. GRAHAM, R.S., L.S.S., PRESIDENT
N. C. LICENSED SOIL SCIENTIST # 1022
GRAHAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC. Ep SOIL S
MAY 15, 1999AXAE A.

KCGraham
Environmental
onsulting, Inc.
May 15, 1999
1.0 Introduction
P.O. Box 799
clkdm North Carolina 28M
Phone I Fax: 91"29-65$8
Graham Environmental Consulting, Inc.(GECI) was contacted by Mr. Greg Swain, PE of
Swain Consulting, Inc., Clinton, NC, and asked to perform a detailed drainage analysis
on an area adjacent to a suspected lagoon seepage zone. The study area is located
on Property owned by ADJ Farms, Inc. and is located off Bass Lake Road, near
Clinton, NC in Sampson County. The purpose of this evaluation was to determine or
estimate the lateral flow volumes which would be expected into an open ditch adjacent
to the suspected lagoon seepage zone and while addressing remedies we feel would
best reduce or eliminate future surface or groundwater impacts.
Previous site study and reporting by S&ME, Inc. addressed the dike safety/integrity
issues. Additionally, their report included estimates of lateral flow to a section of the
ditch which they stated was based on assumed values for materials observed during
deep boring's they performed in the area. S&ME's study did not specifically focus on
collecting data for that purpose.
In the remainder of this report, we will provide our site observations, testing method's
and results, and our final conclusions and recommendations. The following section will
address our general site/soils evaluation and finding's.
2.0 Site and Soils Evaluation
21 Introduction
Soil boring's were performed within the depressional landscape position of the area to
the east of the lagoon dike. This area is bordered by the lagoon to the west and an
open ditch to the east. The area is approximately 80 feet wide by 300 feet long. The
existing landscape position is typically a depressional and linear slope area. Surface
slopes are typically less than 2%.
Page 1 of the appendix contains profile descriptions of the 5 soil boring's made in this
area(S131-5). The location of each baring is shown on our site map, Figure 1, Page 2,
of the appendix.
SOIL I SITE EVALUATIONS * WETLAND DELINEATIONS * SOIL HYDRAULIC TESTING AND DRAINAGE *
ANIMAL I DOMESTIC WASTEWATER SYSTEMS EVALUATIONS * SUBDIVISION !:VALUATION AND PLANNING
MOUNDING ANALYSIS * ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS' SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN'

Graham Environmental Consulting, Inc.
Drainage Report For ADJ Farms, Inc.(ADJ 3-5 Farm)
Mr, Greg Swain, PE
Page Two of Six
May 15,1999
2.2 Soils Descriptions
All soil boring's performed revealed soils with a very poorly -drained drainage class and
was based on observations of gleyed soil colors from the natural soil surface to depth's
of 60 inches.
Subsoil characteristics ranged from clayey to sandy/coarse-loamy parent materials.
The subsoil structure was typically weak granular in the surface to massive with depth.
Soil borings at SB 2 and 3 contained weakly structured to massive sandy clay to sandy
clay loam textures which were very firm and both very sticky and very plastic. The
subsoil's at boring's SB 1, 4 and 5 revealed weakly cemented and dense coarse loamy,
fine sandy loam and loamy, very -fine sands. Auguring in these soils was restricted due
to the density and cemented nature of the subsoil.
Assumptions made subsequent to our soil boring's included that the area has both poor
surface and subsurface drainage, slowly permeable subsoil materials and would not be
expected to respond significantly to the adjacent open -ditch drainage. However, it
would appear that surface run-off potential, in isolated areas, would be high.
Based on observations of landscape positions, ditch cut profiles, and surface ponding
locations -the adjacent soils would appear to be well drained with coarse loamy
subsoil's.
The following section describes our drainage analysis method's and results.
3.0 Methods For Drainage Analysis
3.1 Introduction
As was previously mentioned, the majority of this area was found to have soils with
estimated seasonal high water -table conditions, by observation of soil colors, less than
12 inches. These soil types are similar to Torhunta and Coxville Series.
Water movement or flow velocity, in a fully saturated soil column, is dependent on the
saturated hydraulic conductivity, flow gradient, and soil porosity. Each of these soil and
site properties can be measured. For the purpose of this study, the conductivity and
gradient was measured and the porosity was estimated from both literature and our
experience with similar soils.

Graham Environmental Consulting, Inc.
Drainage Report For ADJ Farms, Inc.(ADJ 3-5 Farm)
Mr. Greg Swain, PE
Page Three of Six
May 15,1999
3.2 Hydraulic Conductivity Measurements
Measurements of saturated hydraulic conductivity of saturated material can be accomplished
by several methods. The method chosen for this site was the Slug Test Method. This
method was conducted in accordance with procedures in Applied Hydrology, 3rd Edition,
Chapter 7, 7.5.1-7.5.3.
Soil boring's made on this site, and specifically at SB's 1, 4, and 5 were typical for the
range of characteristics identified.
Measurement of the saturated zones conductivity was performed at these 3
locations. The test were performed at SB's(slg 1-3) 1, 4, and 5. Pages 3- 12, appendix
contain the graph's and data for each tests. Each graph is followed by the corresponding
data sets. The order of the graphs would be Slug Test(SLG)1-3, SB's 1, 4 and 5. In review
of the data, the values are consistent, with an average conductivity of 0.2637 ft/day(0.132
in/hr), and would be considered slowly permeable.
3.3 Hydraulic Gradient Measurements
Water level measurements were made at each soil boring location on 5/12/99 and during
which, no significant rainfall had occurred with 48 hours. The surface elevations and static
water level elevations are based on using a benchmark elevation of 50 feet and as per the
same benchmark location described in S&ME's report dated Sept. 4, 1998.
Water level values obtained at SB 1, 2, and 5 along with the respective distances between
each, were used to calculate both direction of flow and gradient. The method chosen was
similar to that described in United States Geologic Survey Water -Supply Paper 2220, ""Basic
Ground -Water Hydrology"" by Ralph C. Heath. The value obtained utilizing this procedure
indicated a direction of flow similar to a line from SB 1 to SB 4 with a calculated gradient of
0.04 ft/ft.
3.4 Flow Velocity Calculations
Calculation of flow velocity is based on a equation developed from Darcy's Law. Specifically,
where V=KsatdH/ndL. V is flow velocity, Ksat is the saturated hydraulic conductivity, dH/dL
is the gradient and n is the effective porosity. The effective porosity value is used because
the effective porosity provides the flow path through the soil medium. Based on our
experience with similar soils, we would assume a effective porosity value of 10% or 0.10.
Utilizing the above equation and our values, we would calculate a flow velocity in this area of
0.10 ft/day.

Graham Environmental Consulting, Inc.
Drainage Report For ADJ Farms, Inc.(ADJ 3-5 Farm)
Mr. Greg Swain, PE
Page Four of Six
May 15,1999
3.5 Site Drainage Features- Quantitative Values
In order to calculate the volume of water flow into a drainage feature the rate of flow
and flow window area must be known. We have presented our calculations of flow
velocity above. The flow window area in this case would be the flow window thickness
or ditch depth times the window length.
Elevation measurements made on the site included the ditch top, water level, and ditch
bottom. These measurements were made at Five locations shown on Figure 1, page 2
of the appendix and are referenced as RD1-5. The corresponding elevation values, in
the above order, are shown on this figure.
Utilizing these values we calculated an average ditch depth of 29.17 feet. The average
surface elevation, using boring locations elevations, was calculated at 33.50 feet. The
difference of these two values, 4.33 feet would be the flow window thickness. Allowing
for approximately an additional 12 inches inflow from the bottom would yield 5.33 feet
thickness.
The ditch length, within the very poorly drained zone, was measured at 400 feet.
3.6 Flow Quantity Values
The flow volume, estimated, can now be calculated by the following equation;
Q=VA, where Q is the flow in cu-ft/day, V is the flow velocity in
ft/day and A is the cross -sectional area of the flow window in sq-ft.
Utilizing our values we calculate a flow contribution, of the saturated subsoil medium,
equal to 213 cu-ft/day.
3.7 Other Hydraulic Loading To Ditch System
The above flow volume is specifically an estimate of flow from the saturated zone only.
Other sources of flow would be inflow from the east side of the ditch, rainfall directly
into the ditch, surface runoff and other drained influences from the southern end of the
ditch.
We would assume that drainage from the east side would be limited given the deeper
drain to the north and east.

SITE AND TESTING LOCATIONS MAP
COHARIE FARMS-ADJ 3-5 LAGOON SITE
Clinton, NC -Sampson County
Figure 1, Page 2-Appendix
Prepared For: Mr. Greg Swain, PE
Swain Consulting, Inc.,
x 50.00' benchmark
---------
M. of GV V Fj..
Pu��m�'p�`/Tank ,
SB2
f
..
S133
nl
Sg,i _Stigi
/
/ MONW �t L
/
/
/ S
Existing Animal Confinement Building's
Lagoons
Open Ditch
R 13
Sg,`jq`_st92
M
�p5
Elevation Data:
SB1-34.14'
Water:33.470'
SB2-33.43'
31.805'
SB3-33.32'
31.633'
SB4-32.90'
32.250'
S85-33.69'
32.400'
100.00 feet
1:1200
RD1(31.92, 28.12, 31.13)
RD2(32-87, 29.51, 31.01)
RD3(32.14, 30.35, 31,02)
RD4(32.82, 29.24, 30.89)
RD5(32.39, 28.64, 30.95)
Graham Environmental Consulting, Inc.
P. 0. Box 799
Clinton, North Carolina 28329
Ph/Fax: [phone]
Interceptor Drain

Graham Environmental Consulting, Inc.
Drainage Report For ADJ Farms, Inc.(ADJ 3-5 Farm)
Mr. Greg Swain, PE
Page Five of Six
May 15,1999
Rainfall of 45 to 50 inches over the 6 foot wide ditch, surface runoff directly adjacent to
the ditch(10% of annual rainfall) and possible short circuit surface runoff of seepage
waters would provide additional loading to the ditch. The scope of this project was not
to predict seepage volumes, but we made an attempt, utilizing the Colorado State
Groundwater Model, to estimate the flow required to create a 1.5 foot mounded
groundwater height which exist within the Area of S61.
We input an infiltration zone of 40 feet by 140 feet, a depth to water of 2 feet, a
tmnsmissivity of 2.367 sq.-ft/day(.2367ft/d by 10 feet depth), and a distance to stream
of 60 feet. We ran multiple simulations varying the loading rate until a 1.5 foot rise in
the groundwater was obtained. The results indicated a 0.004 ft/day loading over the 40
by 140 foot area would create a 1.49 foot mound height. The 0.004 ft/day loading
would equal 22.4 cu-ft/day.
We do not offer this number as a value of the precise seepage volume, but present it
only to show that a small volume of water applied daily, in a concentrated area, with
slowly permeable subsoil's, and a shallow groundwater elevation could lead to surface
breakout , surface water flow, storage and or ponding.
4.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
Based on our testing and calculated results, it would appear that subsurface flow of
seepage waters would be minimal. Additionally, it would appear that a combination of
adjacent drainage, surface run-off, and rainfall into the ditch would account for the
majority of the flow in the ditch.
Observations of ponded surface water and potential short circuiting of surface water
into lower ditch top elevations may account for elevated coliform levels in the southern
end of the ditch. Additionally, variation in seasonal water -table elevations would
decrease our estimates of flow volumes due to reduction in flow window areas. Also,
there could be periods of the year where the static water levels could fall below the
ditch bottom elevation and both flow and gradient could be dictated by other drainage
features beyond the open ditch.
Our finding's would indicate that lateral flow, even at low volumes, will be intercepted by
the open ditch. Observations of surface ponding , evidence of past water marks and
surface flow patterns from ponded areas, observed during this study lead us to
conclude that the most likely source of contamination into the ditch would be from
shallow surface water flow from a ponded area adjacent to the southern end of the
ditch.

Graham Environmental Consulting, Inc.
Drainage Report For ADJ Farms, Inc.(ADJ 3-5 Farm)
Mr. Greg Swain, PE
Page Six of Six
May 15,1999
It is our understanding that a current option for remedying this situation includes
continuation of pumping from the diked ditch back into the lagoon or on a designated
spray area on the farm. Obviously, this option should eliminate migration of ditch
surface flow of contamination off -site. However, the location of this ditch, in association
with poorly drained soils adjacent to the active spray irrigation, is essential for spray
field drainage. Therefore, we feel the following recommendation would provide for
interception and collection of the seepage as well as allowing for the currently diked,
open ditch to be returned to a free flowing condition.
Our recommendation would include installing an interceptor drain parallel and along the
toe of the existing lagoon_ The interceptor drain would in a northerly direction for some
100 to 150 feet and discharge into an approved pump chamber. The pump chamber
would be used to designed to allow for pumping of the collected drainage back into the
lagoon. The interceptor drain should be installed at a depth to meet both a minimum of
1-2 feet below the existing lagoon bottom elevation or 1-2 feet below the lowest
elevation in the depressional area immediate to the east of the southernmost end of the
drain location_ The drain should be installed to allow for bedding within a gravel
envelope and on as minimum a grade as to prevent settlement of fines within the drain
tubing. Elevation details should consider the minimum 6 inches of gravel bedding.
We would recommend keeping the open ditch diked for a period of time following the
interceptor drain installation in order to test the water quality of the open ditch waters,
which we feel will allow for re -opening this drain and thereby re -reestablishing a key
drainage feature for the adjacent spray irrigation fields.
In consideration of future management and maintenance requirements associated with
the present option and the finding's of our study -we offer this recommendation as a
potential means of providing a viable method to reduce/eliminate the surface water and
or groundwater impacts from this seepage zone.
The finding's, conclusions and recommendations presented herein is our professional
opinion, but GEC1 makes no claims that concurrence from the Appropriate Regulatory
Authority will be obtained.

COUNTY :
SAMPSON
QUAD NO:
REPORTTO :
FRO Regional Office
COLLECTOR(S) :
BROIYN(BARNIIANDT
DATE:
3/1"9
TIpIE.
PURPOSE:
flamer:
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
BOD 310 eng/L
COD Hieh 340 mglL
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 1100m1
Coliform: 1AF'Total 31504 lt00ml
TOC mg/l
Turbitity NTU
Residue., Suspended 530 mg/L
Total Suspended solids mg/L
pH units
Alkalinity to p1l 4 5 ntg l-
Alkalinity to PH 8.3 mg/t.
Carbanate mg/L
Bicarbonate mg/L
Cuban dioxide mgil,
Chloride mgiL
Chtomiutn: 11 1032 ag11,
Color: True 80 ca
Cyanide 720 mgN,
COMMENTS:
Lacatinn or Site:
Dcscriptian of sampling point
Smnpling Method:
Remarks'
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemishy Laboratory Report I Ground Wmer Quality
SAMPLE PRIORITY
X]ROUTINC E]13MERGENCY
MR CIIA[NOFCUSTOOY ❑
m SAMPIXTYPE 4
ADJ FARMS
Diu Solids 70300
mg/L
Fluoride 951
mg1L
Hardness: total 900
mg/L
Hardness: tnon-cub) 902
mg/L
Phenols 32730
uglL
Specific Cond. 95
umhoshm2
Sulfate
mg/L
Sulfide 745
mg/L
M BAS
mg/U,
Oil and Orense
mRJL
Silica
mg/L
Boton
Formaldehyde
mg/L
N
NED as N 610
7.6
mg1L
N
'I KN as N 625
9.2
tnglL
X
NO2 4NO3 as n 630
1.3
mg/L
N
P: Total as P 665
0.03
mg/L
PO4
mglL
AR -Silver 46566 uglL
AI -Aluminum 46557 ug/L
As -Arsenic 46531 u&fL
Da -Barium 46558 uglL
Ca -Calcium 46552 mg/L
Cd-Cadium 46559 ug/L
Cr-Chnamium 46560 ug/I,
Cu- Capper 1042 ug/L
Fe- Iron 1045 uEVL
I Ig• Mercury 71900 uglL
K-Potassium 46555 mg/L
Mg- Mngnaium 927 mg/L
Mn-Mangnnese 1055 trg1L
Nn- Sodium 929 MA
Ni-Nickel ug/L
I'b-Lead 46564 ug/L
Se -Selenium ugIL
7-n 7_inc 46567 ug/L
Lab Number 9G0606
Date Received
3119199
Time Received
9,35
Received By
DS
Released By ; IDS
Dme repotted: 401199
sochlotine Pesticides
aophosphofus Pesticides .
Sea Pesticides
Herbieides
JVuinlilc Utganics(VOA bottle) I
TPI1-Gasoline Range
I'I'I I-11'1'ex Crasolint Ranite
REC��ifE�
APR 1 2 1999
FAYETTEVI LLE
REG. OFFICE
9430606.t4CH

l�vY cxF CAniz ras � ��•.i.4 North Carolina
FIELD/LA B FORM r , 4 Department of Environment. Health. and Natural Resources
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - GROUNDWATER SECTION
C my SAMPLE TYPE - SAMPLE PRIORITY Lab Number Id) 60
Qu o ' / Co Serial No. 17 Water ["Routine Date Rec ed Time
Soil ❑ !Emergency
Lat. Long. ❑ Other Rec'd by From: B aurae Hand Del.,
Other. -
Report To: ARO,jfw7 MRO, RRO,• WaRO, WiRO, Chain of Custody Data Entry By: Ck:
-(D
WSRO, Kinston FO, Fed. Trust, Central Oft., Other: Date Reported:
Shipped hy: Bus, Courier, Hand Del., Other-
� �, Purpose:
Collector(s): Z ?L�-t - Dale 't Time 1b %+ ?Ary Baseline, goTplaini, Compliance LUST, Pesticide Study, Federal Trust,
FIELD ANALYSES Owner
pH400 Spec. Cond.g4 at 250 C Location or site
Temp.10 oC Odor Description of sampling point w
Appearance Sampling Method _ _ _ Sample Interval
Field Analysis By: Remarks
LABORATORY ANALYSES
BOO, 310 m
COD High 340 mgll
COD Low 335 m I
Colilorm: MF Fecal 31616 1100ml
Coliform: MF Total31504 1100mt
TOC 680 m /1
Turbidity 76 NTU
Residue., Suspended 530 mg/1
pH 403 unit.
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 rngll
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/1
Carbonate 445 mg/1
Bicarbonate 440 m /1
Carbon dioxide 405 mg/I
Chloride 040 mg11
Chromium: Hex 1032 u d
Color: True 60 CU
Cyanide 720 mg/l
Lab Comments:
OW-54 REV. 7196 For Dissolved Analyals - submit Illiered sample and write ID IS" In bloc`

COUNTY: SAMPSON
QUAD NO'
REPORT TO : FRO
COLLECTOR(S) : BROWNIBARNIIARDT
DATES 3/18/99
TIME:
PURPOSE;
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Regional Oflice
BOD 310 mg1L
COD Iligh 340 mg/L
COD Low 333 mg/L
Coliforw NIP Fecal 31616 1100m1
Coliform: NIF Total 31504 1100ml
TOC mg11
Turbility NTU
Residue.. Suspended 530 mWL
Total Suspended solids mg/L
p[ 1 units
Alkalinity to pl1 4 5 mg1l.
Alkalinity to plI 8,3 mg/L
Carbonate mpv L
nicarbanate ma1L
Carbon dioxide mgll.
Chloride mWL
Chromium: ilex 1032 ug/L
Color: Trot 80 c.a
Cyanide 720 mpJL
COMMENTS:
Owner:
Location or Site:
Dexription of sampling point
Sampling hlellto&
Remarks -
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report 1 Ground Water Quality
SAMPLE PRIORITY
IRUUTINE ElENWRGENCY
El CiIA[NOPCUSTOUY ❑
2
W� SAMPLETYPE
ADJ FARATSIFARh134
Diss, Solids 70300
mg1L
Fluoride 951
mg1L
Ilardnesr total 900
mg/L
Hardness: (non-earb) 902
mg/L
Phenols 32730
ugll,
Specific Cond, 95
umhos/cm2
Sulfate
mg/L
Sulfide 745
mg1L
NIBAS
mWL
Oil and Grease
mg/l,
Si I icn
mgll.
1101nn
Formaldehyde
mg/L
N113 ns N 610
79
mg11.
'IKN as N 625
80
mglL
X
NO2 4NO3 as n 630
1.8
mg/L
P. Ialal as P 665
0.02
n1*4.
1'04
mg/L
Ag-Silver 46566 ug/L
AI -Aluminum 46557 uglL
As -Arsenic 46551 ug/L
Be-Buium 46558 ug1L
Ce-Calcium 46552 mg/L
Cd-Codium 46559 ug1L
Cr-Chromium 46560 ug/L.
Cu- Copper 1042 ug1L.
Fe- [ran 1045 ug/L
Ilg- Mercuiy 71900 ug1L
K-Potassium 46555 mgl1.
h1g- Magnesium 927 mg/L
Mn-Manganese IU55 ug1L
Na- Sodium 929 nrglL
Ni-Nickel uglL
Pb-Lead46564 ug/L
Se-Selenlurn uglL
Zn Zinc 46567 ug(l,
Lab Number 9GH04
Dole Received 3119199
Time Received 9',35
Received By DS
Released By ; DS
Dalereported: 411199
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Nitrogen Peslicides
Acid Herbicides
Semiralatiles
TPII-Diesel Range
Volatile Organics.(VOA bottle)
TPH.Gawline Range
TPII-BTE7( Gasoline Rance
REC��VE�
4PR 12 1999
FAYETTEVII LE
REG. OFFICE
WitwN.MC1r

1tlr#7!tCAL- vv*m ,
' FIELDILAB FORM
o ' 1 n Serial No.
' ',o 57 00 Long. y c
SAMPLETYPE SAMp g pglonly,
Water Routine
❑ Soil Emergency
❑ Other
Report TM AROra MRO, RRO,•WaRO, WiRO, I j 'Chain of Custody
WSRO, Kinston FO, Fed, Trust, Central Off.. Other:
Shipped by: Bus, ourie , Ha Del. Other:
North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
.DIVISION OF WATER OUALITY -GROUNDWATER SECTION
Lab Number
Dale Received Time 4
Rec'd by: w—frorm 13 , Courie and Del.,
2 Other:
Data Entry By: Ck:
Date Reported:
Purpose:
Collector{s): Date 3'`6�' Time :O A Baseli a, Complaint, Compliance01. Pesticide Study, Federal TfusC 1� h��
FIELD -A LYSES Owner AqLrAl2 PABm
pH400 Spec. Cond.94
Temp.1e oC Odor
Appearance
Field Analysis By:
LABDQATQRY ANALYSES
130U 310 m 11
COD High 340 mg/1
COD Low 335 m II
Colitorm: MF Fecal 31616 1100ml
Colitorm: MF Total 31504 /100m1
TOC 6eu m 1t
Turbidity 76 NTU
Residue., Suspended 530 mgn
pH 403 unit.
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mgll
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 rng11
Carbonate 445 mg/1
Bicarbonate 440 m 11
Carbon dioxide 405 m A
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chromium: Hex 1032 u 11
Color: True 80 CU
Cyanide 720 m9/1
Lab Comments:
at 250 C
Location or site
Description of sampling point Y
Sampling Method _ sw _ Sample Internal
Remarks
Wkiffl.1
DISS, 5042 !i
A - Silver 46566 u 11
Organochlorine Pesticides
Flouride 951 mgA
At - Aluminum 46557 u A
_
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Haidnessiv Total goo m 11
As - Arsenic 46551 u n
Nitrogen Pesticides
Hardness non-carb 902 rndl
Ba - Barium 46555 u 11
Acid Herbicides
h n! 7 u 11
Ca - Calcium 46552 m 1
PCB's
'
Cd - Cadmium 46559 u 11
SUIlate 945 me N
Cr - Chromium 46560 ugA
Sulfide 745 mw
Cu - Copper 46562 u Il
_
Fe - Iran 46563 u 11
Semtvolalile Organics
Oil and Grease m 11
Fig - Mercur 7190o ug11
TPH - Diesel Range
K - Potassium 46555 mgll
M - Magnesium 46554 m /1
Mn - Manganese 46565 u 11
NH. as N 610 mall
Na - Sodium 46556 m 11
Volatile Organics (VOA bottle)
Mil - Nickel unit
TPH - Gasoline Range
NO + NO as N 630 m n
Pb - Lead 46564 u I!
TPH - STEX Gasoline flange
P. Total as P 665 m 11
Se - Selenium u n
Zn - Zinc 46567 uQA
GW54 REV. 7/96 For Dissolved Analysis - submit littered sample and write "DIS" in bloc',

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
817 CASTLE HAYNE STREET
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28303
[phone] / [phone] (FAX)
AIR * FUEL • WATER • FOOD
CERTIFICATE ,QF ANALYSIS
CLIENT: NC DEHNR
ADDRESS: Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
CONTACT PERSON: Mr. Jeffery Brown
ACCOUNT NUMBER: #KN003
SAMPLE ID: 1. Ditch, Dam - ID #99WE31927
2. Upstream - ID #99WU31928
3. Ditch, Upper End - ID #99WE31929
4. Downstream - ID #99WD31930
NC #11
NC #37714
USDA #3787
• WASTES
CERT #25985
DATE REC'D: 03/18/99 SAMPLED: 03/18/99
SAMPLED BY: J. Brown
DELIVERED BY: J. Brown
SAMPLE CODE: Waste water., Grab
REFERENCE:ADJ Farm, 3-5
DATA REVIEWED BY:
DATE REPORTED: 03/ 4/99 _.
**+++**+**+**************************+**************+*# }}fir*}***+it*++t+******+***
ANALYSIS bamnm 1 2 3 4
COLIFORM, FECAL (per 100 al) SM18 9222D 9 36 <9 45
CVAMEUTS: < = Less than
> - Greater than
PAGE 1 OF 1
RECEIVED
AIAR 2 6 1999
FAYETTEVILLE
REG. OFFICE
The data and other InWrnation coaWned on this, and other a=rnpanyinp documents. represent only the samples) analyzed and ES MEMBER
rendered upon the oonddltion that it is not to be reproduced wholly or in part for advertising or other purposes without written approval
from the laboratory.
USDA-EPA-NIOSN Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Anatyses and Research

r
. 'e- I
Microbac Laboratories, Inc...
FAYETTELLE DIVISION
617 CASTLE 4iP.YNE STREET
FA ETTE11ILLE, KC 2'3303
[phone] / [phone] (FAX),
AIR • FUEL • WATER + FOOD •
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
14C #11
NC #37714
USDA #3787
WASTES
CERT #25985
C'LTENT- NC DRIMR DATE REC'D: 03/10/99 SAMPLED: 03/18/99
ADDRESS: Wachovia Buaidi.nq,j;Suite 714 SAMPLP BY: J. Brown
Fayetteville, NC 28301 DELIVERED BY: J. Brown
CONTACT PERSON: Mr. Jeffery Brown SAiVLE CODE: Wasta water, Grab
ACCOUNT NUMBER: #KN003 r � �` � � 1REFER&1d1:ADJ F1rm 3-5 '
c'AMPLE ID: 1. Ditch, Jam - ID #99WE31927
2. Upstream - ID #99WU31928
.3. Ditch, Upper End - ID #99WE.31929 �.
4.. Down.9tream — ID #99WD31.930
DATA REVIEWEDS BY:
TATE REPORTED, ff:i:'-T_4/99
i+4 :S4-9 4-4 :# lr'�ii-1 ,F+-L4++.4 i•-i+..44 i4i+++•Lii+i+i i-i ++L}+. 4--i-1.4 4 4-4 4o1: 4+1-*Lr4 i4- J- ,A : l 4,4 i
IMLYSIS METHOD 1 2 3 a
+.-k++++#+++++++*t+++f+F*-ki• +++++++is++++4 4•++++++4,4+#si*#•r 3•k 4, kit++++a- +;#*++M++++f+
COLIFORM, FECAL (per: 100 ml) SM18 9222T) 9 t� 36 <9 f45 �+
CGi44ENTS: < Less th&a tiF
f ,
> = Greater than
t
The date and other Inform don corneinad on this. and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is
rendered upon the condtion Und it is not to be reproduced wholly or in part for advertising or other purposes without written approval
from the laboratory.
USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Cortsutting Chernical and Miaobiobgical Analyses and Research
MEMBER

COUNTY
QUAD NO:
REPORT TO
COLLECTOR(S)
❑ATH:
TINI17:
PURPOSE:
SAMPSON
FRO
PHILLIPSIRARNHARDT
11.23-1998
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Regional Office
BOp 310 rnWL
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Law 335 mg/L
Coliform, MF Fecal316i6 /100ml
Colit-orm: MP Total 31504 /100mf
TOC mg/l
Turbilitv NfU
Residue., Suspended 530 mg/L
Total Suspended solids mg1L
PH units
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 mgll.
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 m&iL
Carbonate mglL
Bicarbonate MwL
Carbon dioxide mglL
Chloride mg/L
Chromium: Hex 1032 ug/L
Color: True 80 cu.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
COMM E,YTS
OAmer:
Location or Site:
Description of sampling point
Sampling Method:
Remarks:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report 1 Ground Water Qus11ty
hiPL� - E PRJORTrY
7ROUTWEEMERGENCY
CHAIN OF CUSTODY ❑
W SAMPLETYPL'
ADJ EARMS
Diss. Solids 70300
mg/L
Fluoride 951
mg/L
Hwdnesr, total 900
mg/L
Hardness (non-carh) 902
mg/L
Phenols 32730
ug1L
Specific Cond. 95
umhos/cm2
SLlfate
mg/L
Sulfide 745
mg/L
MBAS
mg/L
Oil and Grease
mg/L
Silica
mg/L
Boron
Formaldehyde
mglL
X
NH3 m N 610
0.08
mg/L
X
TKN as N 625
0.2
mg/L
X
NO2+NO3 as n 610
2.7
mg/L
X
P: Total as P 665
0.01
mg/L
PO4
mg/L
Ag-Silver 46566 ug/L
AI -Aluminum 46557 u91L
As -Arsenic 46551 ug/L
Ha -Barium 46559 ug/L
Ca -Calcium 46552 mglL
Cd-Cadium 46559 ug/L
Cr.Chromium 46560 u91L
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/L
Fe -Iran 1045 ug/L
Hg- Mercury 71900 ug/L,
K-Pota&sium 4655$ mglL
Mg- Magnesium 927 mg/L
Nin-Manganese 1055 ug/L
Na-Sodium 929 rnWL
Ni-Nickel ug/L
Pb-Lead 46564 ug/L.
Se -Selenium ug/L
Zn Zinc 46567 ugl1.
Lab Number : 8 G 2 337
Date Received
I1-24-1998
Time Received
9;00
Received By
DS
Released By : DS
Date reported 12-18-1998
Organochlerinc Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Nilrorten Pesticidcs
I Acid Herbicides I
I l Volatile Organics (VOA battle) I
Gasoline
802437.NOV

IC9 B. HUNTJR;
ZRNOR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
January 15, I999
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jim Leuinas
Dam Safety Engineer
Land Quality - Raleigh Central Office
FROM: Jeffery Brown, Environmental Engineer fiml*'t
Fayetteville Regional Office
SUBJECT: ADJ Farm Site 3-5 Swine Lagoon
This memo is in regards to the ADJ Farm Site 3-5 Lagoon that Paul Rawls and
myself spoke with you about on January 14, 1999_ Please find the Geotechnical
Evaluation Report completed by S&RIE along with this memo. It would be nice
if our office could get your comments within 30 days in order to move forward in
correcting this problem.
If you have any questions or require any further or additional information, please
contact Paul Rawls or myself. Thank you for your cooperation regarding this
matter.
0
Enclosure
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 2491301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLE0110% PO3T-CON5VMER PAPER

GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT
Bass Lake Road Rog Lagoon
At
ADJ 3-5 Farm
Clinton, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1040-98-075

y
Celebrating 25 }rears of ExceClence
September 4, 1998
Coharie Farms
300 Westover Road
Clinton, North Carolina 28328
Attention: Mr. Jeff Warren
Reference: Report of Geotechnical Evaluation
Bass Lake Road Hog Lagoon at ADJ 3-5 Farm
Clinton, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1040-98-075
Dear Jeff
As requested, S&ME, Inc. has completed the geotechnical evaluation of the hog waste lagoon dikes at
the ADJ 3-5 Faun. The purpose of our study was to evaluate wet surface conditions with respect to
seepage and dike stability and to provide recommendations for additional drainage or dike stabilization
measures that may be needed. This report presents the results of our field work, laboratory tests and
engineering analysis along with our conclusions and recommendations.
SMIE, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have any
questions regarding this report or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact us at [phone].
Sincerely,
S&ME, INC.
F. Sean McGrath, P.E.
Geotechnical Engineer
N.C. Registration No_ 19784
Attachments
VnM, PhD., P.E.
Chief Geotechnical Consultant
N.C. Registration No. 9631
S&ME, Inc. 3109 Spring Forest Rood, Raleigh, North Carolina 27616, [phone], Fax [phone]
Moiling oddness: P.O. Box 58069, Raleigh, North Corolino 27658-8069

TABLE OF CONTENTS
t 1.0
PROJECT INFORMATION.........................................................................................1
2.0
FIELD EXPLORATION„
t
3.0
LABORATORY TESTING ,,,.....M....... N............. .......
„................................................ .3
4.0
SITE CONDITIONS
...»3
r
............................. .......................
..............................................
5.0
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS......................................................................................4
i 6.0
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS.............................................................................................5
6.1
SEEPAGE........................................................................................................................
5,
6.2
SLOPE STAABII.rrY
....................................................5
7.0
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
.....................................................»...6�'
APPENDICES
I Figures
II Test Boring and Piezometer Records
III Laboratory Test Results

1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
Project information was provided by Mr. Jeff Warren of ADJ Farms. This information included
design plan and cross section drawings as well as "Waste Management System" design
documentation prepared by USDA Soil Conservation Service (currently NRCS). The lagoons are
located on the east side of existing hog houses and range in size from about 39,300 square feet
r.
j (southern lagoon) to about 70,600 square feet (northern lagoon). We understand the northern
lagoon was constructed in 1992 and the southern lagoon was constructed in 1994. Both
impoundments were created by a combination of excavation and construction of earthen perimeter
dikes. The dikes range in height from about 5 to 12 feet above the original ground surface and
were designed with 3":1(V) slopes_ We understand an effort was made during construction to
place at least a 12 inch thick layer of clayey sand along the upstream slopes to reduce seepage.
Information contained in the "Waste Management System" documents indicate the dikes are
classified as low hazard dams.
It is our understanding that during a routine annual inspection, representatives of the Water
Quality Section of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(NCDENR), Fayetteville Division, obtained samples of ponded surface water near the
downstream dike toe at the southeast corner of the northern lagoon. Water samples were
subsequently tested for fecal coliform. Test results indicated fecal coliform levels ranging from 80
i
col/100 ml to 6,150 coll100 ml. Based on the results, the Division of Water Quality requested
that ADJ farms further evaluate seepage conditions in the vicinity of the northern lagoon and
potential impacts of seepage on dike stability. They also recommended that ADJ Farms
implement appropriate methods to prevent off -site discharge of water containing high fecal
coliform levels.
i
According to Mr. Jeff Warren of ADJ Farms, wet ground surface conditions existed on the east
side of the northern lagoon prior to lagoon construction. Information contained within the
"Waste Management System" documents indicates a seasonal high water table elevation of about
t 36 feet within the lagoon perimeter which would place groundwater levels at or near the existing
4
ground surface during wetter periods of the year.
1

10 FIEELD EXPLORATION
A site reconnaissance was performed by Mr. Sean McGrath, P.E. of S&ME, Inc. to evaluate
general surface features in the vicinity of the lagoons. During the reconnaissance, locations for
soil borings and piezometers were selected. Once established, locations of borings, piezometers
and nearby surface features were determined by representatives of S&ME, Inc. by measuring
distances and estimating right angles from existing site features. Ground surface elevations in the
vicinity of borings (including dike slopes) were determined using surveying methods. All
elevations were based on an existing site benchmark which AD7 Farms has assumed to be
elevation 50 feet. Locations of borings, piezometers and nearby site features are shown on Figure
1 in Appendix I. Horizontal distances should be considered approximate.
To evaluate the general consistency of embankment and foundation soils, two soil test borings
were advanced to depths ranging from 20 to 30 feet along the crest of the east dike of the
northern lagoon. At each boring location, piezometers were installed to depths of 10 and 20 feet
to evaluate phreatic conditions. The 20 foot piezometer at the location of boring B-1 was
installed in a separate borehole (i.e., not within the 30 foot soil test boring). in addition to soil
test borings and piezometers, two hand auger borings were advanced near the toe of the dike
slope to observe general soil types and water levels.
The soil test borings and piezometer holes were advanced using hollow stem auger drilling
procedures with a CME 55 truck mounted drill. Within soil test borings, samples of subsurface
soils were taken at 2-1/2 foot intervals above a depth of 10 feet and at 5 foot intervals below 10
feet using a split -spoon sampler. Standard penetration tests were conducted in conjunction with
split -spoon sampling in general accordance with ASTM D 1586-84. Representative portions of
split -spoon samples were returned to our laboratory for visual classification and testing.
Test Boring Records indicating specific subsurface information from each boring are included in
Appendix II. Stratification lines shown on Test Boring Records are intended to present
approximate depths of changes in soil types. Naturally, transitional changes in soil type are often
2

gradual and cannot be defined at a particular depth. .
Each piezometer consists of a 5 foot long, 1 inch diameter PVC screen section with 0.01 inch
slots followed by l' inch diameter solid PVC pipe to the ground surface. Clean sand was placed
t
along the screen sections to approximately i foot above the top screen. Within the 10 foot
piezometer, hydrated bentonite was ' placed above the sand to the ground surface. Within the 20
foot piezometers, about 2 feet of hydrated bentonite was placed above the sand followed by soil
auger cuttings to the ground surface. Piezometer installation records are included in Appendix II.
3.0 LABORATORY TESTING
Laboratory testing consisting of natural moisture content and grain size analyses was performed
on representative samples for general classification purposes. All testing was conducted in
general accordance with applicable ASTM standards. Test results are included in Appendix M.
4.0 SITE CONDITIONS
In general, downstream slopes and crests of the dikes are grass covered and appear to be routinely
mowed. No surface sloughing, cracks, deep erosion gullies or other signs of distress were
observed. Based on measured elevations and distances, the downstream slope of the east dike of
the northern lagoon (in the vicinity of the soil test borings) ranges from about 3.5":1(V) to
4.3(i):IM. Cross sections of the dike at the boring locations are shown in Figure 3 in Appendix
I.
The areas north, east and south of the lagoons consist of both grass covered areas and cultivated
agricultural fields. An existing drainage ditch is located about 80 feet east of the lagoon dikes and
is oriented in a north -south direction. The ditch is approximately 5 feet wide and 3 to 4 feet deep.
Approximately 2 to 6 inches of water was observed within the ditch.
3

At the time of our drilling operations, ponded surface water (about 2 to 4 inches deep) covering
an area of approximately 20 feet by 30 feet was present near the downstream toe of the east dike
of the northern lagoon. Water samples previously collected by the Division of Water Quality
were taken from this area TO "lush" grass extends 50 to 100 feet (north, east and south) beyond
the observed ponded water. Based on conversations with representatives of ADJ Farms, we
understand that very wet conditions are present in the areas of "lush" grass during wetter periods
of the year. The ground surface throughout the remaining areas surrounding the dikes was
relatively dry with no signs of prior ponded water.
5.0 SUBSURFACE CONDMONS
Based on results of the borings, the dike materials can be described as loose to medium dense
clayey and silty sands (SC, Slbl) which extend to depths of about 8 to 10 feet. Relatively clean
loose to medium dense sands (SP) were encountered below the dike fill materials. Stiff silty clay
(CL) was encountered within the last 6 inches (29.5 to 30 feet) in boring B-1. Standard
penetration test values ranged from 10 to 37 blows per foot within the embankment material and
from 10 to 36 blows per foot within the foundation soils.
Water depths were measured in piezometers and hand auger borings at least 24 hours after
completion. Both of the 10 foot piezometers were dry. Water depths ranging from 12.3 to 12.5
feet (approximate Elevations 34.6 to 35.0) were recorded in the 20 foot piezometers. Water
depths of 4 feet were recorded in both hand auger borings which correspond to approximate
Elevations 34.5 feet and 32.8 feet for hand auger borings HA-1 and HA 2, respectively. in
general, recorded water levels appear to be at or a few feet below original ground surface.
Although water levels may fluctuate with seasonal changes in rainfall and evaporation rates, water
levels directly below the dike are also influenced by the water level within the lagoons. A rise in
water levels beneath the dikes is expected if water levels in the lagoons increase.

R
6.0 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
6.1 Seepage ,
Hand drawn flow net procedures were used to attempt to model possible seepage conditic
'to estimate pore water pressures in the dike section and foundation soils. The flow n
r•"�`; adjusted to correspond to water levels measured in piezometers and hand auger borings.
on the flow net and recorded water levels, it appears that seepage is primarily downwa
laterally through the foundation soils. Also, piezometric water levels indicate that hydraulic
loss occurs rapidly, such that flow below the dike is not confined by the embanlanent soils
phreatic surface (top line of seepage) appears to emerge at the ground surface in depressed
beyond the dike toe. Due to high early head loss, water levels downstream of the dikes m
1 only slightly higher than original groundwater levels in the area
Based on the flow net and assumed "uniform" hydraulic conductivity of the foundation
calculated infiltration into the existing ditch is about 2,900 cubic feet per day for a 150 foot
section. However, based on field observations and conversations with representatives of
Farms, we expect that actual seepage rates are much less than calculated, at least during
periods of the year. Further evaluation, including monitoring of flow rates within the ditch,
hydraulic conductivity tests, and monitoring of ponded surface water would be required in o
to more accurately estimate seepage quantities.
i
6.2 Slope Stability
Analysis was conducted to evaluate stability of the downstream slope of the dike in the vicinit}
boring B-1 where wet conditions were observed downstream. The phreatic surface estimated
�- the flow net and measured water levels was used in the analysis. Soil strength parameters w
i. estimated based on empirical correlations with standard penetration test N-values and soil types
Graphical results of the analysis are presented in Figure 6 in Appendix 1. As indicated,
minimum calculated factor of safety against slope instability is about 2.8. The most critical fails
5

surface indicated by the lowest factor of safety is a shallow sloughing type failure. Typically,
calculated factors of safety of 1.5 or greater are considered acceptable for retention pond dikes.
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECONEOENDAITONS
I
Based on results of our stability analyses and field observations, the dike sections appear to be
adequately maintained and in stable condition. No signs of sloughing, excessive erosion, cracks
or other signs of instability were observed. We expect seepage has contributed to wet conditions
downstream of the east dike of the northern lagoon. Although original groundwater levels were
relatively shallow in the area prior to lagoon construction (EIevation 36 feet as indicated in -
"Waste Management System" documents), additional hydraulic head associated with elevated .,
water levels within the lagoons has likely resulted in increased water levels downstream.
It has been our experience that it is often difficult to directly contribute fecal coliform levels to a
single source. However, based on estimated seepage conditions and the close proximity of the
lagoon to the area where water quality samples were obtained, it is likely that fecal conform
contained within ponded surface water is at least partly the result of seepage. The results of our
analyses and site observations indicate the potential for off -site discharge of fecal coliform laden
surface water can be reduced by installation of a blanket drain collection system. More extensive
drainage to improve dike stability does not appear necessary at this time.
We recommend the blanket drain consist of a 24 inch thick layer of clean sand having less than 5
percent fines. Based on field observations, we recommend that the blanket drain be about 30 feet
wide and 200 feet long. The drain should be placed adjacent to the toe of the east dike in the area
where there is evidence of prior surface water ponding ("wettest area" on Figure 1). Beyond the
blanket dram, fill should be placed as required to provide positive drainage to promote rainfall
runoff away from the dikes.
Perforated HDPE collector pipes wrapped in filter fabric should be installed within the sand
blanket. The pipes should be spaced no further than 25 feet apart and should be oriented
perpendicular to the dike alignment. The collector pipes should be connected to a header pipe
6

which should discharge into a sump pit. Water from the sump pit should be pumped back into the
lagoon. A detail sketch of the blanket drain is shown on Figure 4 in the Appendix.
As discussed previously, seepage rates'calculated using the flow net model are likely much higher
than actual conditions. However, it is important to realize that placement of collected seepage
water into the lagoon will add to temporary storage thereby reducing the "allowable" temporary
storage period. Once the seepage collection system is installed and site grades improved,
pumping rates form the sump pit should be monitored for a brief period to better determine the
need (if any) for additional temporary storage capacity.
We request the opportunity to review and re-evaluate our drainage collection recommendations if
alternatives are to be considered.
7

APPENDIX

CORKER OF PAD MARKED
nH RED CROSS FLAGS
�MV(ASSWMED EL.EV. 50Ar)
NOTE: BASE PLAN OBTAINED FROM ADJ—FARMS
TOPO SURVEY DRAWING DATED 12/17/93.
SCALE: 1' = 1W BORING LOCATION PLAN Rc"RE No.
BASS LAKE ROAD LAGOON
CHECKED E11F. F5M � "{ ;-� .
J 3-5 FARM
DRAYIN Ur. TRP _ CUNTON ORTHCAROUNA
DAM JULY 1998 ENGINEERING A TESTING � JOB N0.
1040-98-075

GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
B-1 B-2
45 21
' 1s •
Al) 37
10
10
20
' •.
23
10
r.
tz
35
• •.
z
%
;= :
36
:..
.•
10
3
W
�'•
.
22
•.
25
••'
•.'.
12
20
.-.
•'
12
LEGEND
SEE ATTACHED LEGEND
(APPENDIX 11)
FlG7m NO.
BASS LAKE ROAD LAGOON
diECJCED F51vI ADJ 3-5 FARM 2
ORAwN Br: TRP - ' CLINTON NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL SEW
DATE -VICES
,A1LY t998 ENGINEERING • TESTING .ilk Na 1040-98-075

r ELIEV.IFTJ
50
r+
30.
i
n
n
s+
EUV. (FT)
,. s0
DIKE CROSS SECTIONS
CRM % 47AW
_ HA4
AMOXWTE
4NGK4L GROUND SURFACE
CREST . 47.0S'
PPROXIMAW
MWAL GROUND SUWACE
NOT ams"o
DIKE CROSS SECTIONS
BASS LAKE ROAD LAGOON
ADJ 3-5 FARM
CLINTON, NORTH CAROLINA
*smlA
SCAW f" - 20 APPROVED Or MM
OAR» Al usr 19" O w BY:
AGOD. IM-45-076 IFOM

DRAINAGE BLANKET DETAIL
CLEAN SAND (s 5% FINES)
DRAINAGE BLANKET
DIKE SLOPE 6" PERFORATED HDPE "COLLECTOR" PIPE
g•YVRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC
SPACED EVERY 25 FT" HORIZONTALLY)
30'
6" PERFORATED HDPE "HEADER" PIPE
WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC
(DISCHARGE INTO COLLECTION SUMP)
DRAINAGE BLANKET DETAIL StME
FIGURE Na
'� �"�"'" BASS LAKE LAGOON 4
A D J 3-5 FARM mm err ' ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE'S
CLINTON, NORTH CAROLINA CAM Air 19W ENGINEERING • TESTING

ESTIMATED SEEPAGE FLOW NET
ELEV,(F71
30
Clam . aar
wA?p sjWAW . 4W
ccrAw MGM
` �-"arwFn� IoJI'o MI
AFTf10Dt FACV.. >tv
FQ
NOTE. MGM EA11LY W_V LOSS REQUIM
1N OROER FOR F'FYtEA'I1O ICIZ E
?Q CQRRFBSPM TQ PQ30METF
wAlTR LEVELS MEASURED G PIEZOWIERS
ESTIMATED SEEPAGE FLOW NET
BASS LAKE ROAD LAGOON
AN 3-5 FARM
CLINTON, NORTH CAROLINA
#SM,E
9CJlE: 1" - 2)i ►PPRUAD &I FSY
OATE: AUGUST logo ORFIYR 6T:
J1b 110. f040-B�-075 nCURE 5

125
75
Y-Axis
(ft)
50
25
Bass Lake Lagoon
Ten Most Critical. C:4096A.PLT By: FSM 07-14-90 6:01 pm
Soil Strength Parameters
1- Clayey to Silty Sand Fill: T = 120 (pct), C' = 0, �' = 33 °
2- Medlum Dense Sand: r = 120 (peo, C' m 01 �' = 34 °
3- Medium Dense Sand: y = 115 (pCO, C' = 0, �' W 32 °
4
e
6
4
z----------------- i I
Z5 50 75 100 125 150
PCSTABL5 FS min= 2.773 X-Axis (ft)
FIGURE 6
175

I LEGENO TO SOIL CLASSIFICATION AND SYMBOLS I
SOIL TYP,IES CONSISTENCYY OF COHESIVE SOILS
(Shown in Graphic Log)
STD.. PENETRATION
Fill
+ RESISTANCE
Possible FBI
CONSISTENCY RI (jWS/FndT
Topsoil Very Soft 0 to 2
Soft 3 to 4
Gravel Firm 5 l0 8
Buff o to 15
Very Stiff l8 to 30
Sand Hard 31to 50
Very Hard Over 50
USilt BRATIV—QFHSISY QE;OHFRmN>G F55-5=
® Clay STD. PENETRATION
RESISTANCE
Organic RELATIVE DENSITY SLOWS/F{L
Effi Very Loose 0 to 4
Loose 5 to t0
Sandy Medium Dense 11 to 30
Dense 31 to 50
® Silty Very Dense Over 50
® Clayey SAMPLER TXMS
® (Shown in Samples Column)
Silty Sand
5hetby Tube
Clayey Sand ® Split Spoon
Sandy Silt I Rock Core
❑ No Recovery
® Clayey Silt
Sandy Clay JERN.
Silty Clay Standard - The Number of Blows of 140 Ib. Hammer
Penetration Falling 30 in. Required to Drive 1.4 in.
Partial) Weathered J.D. Split Spoon Sampler 1 88
Y As Specified in AST�1 D-1588
Rock
R£C -Total Length of Rock Recovered in the Core Barrel
Divided by the Total Length of the Core Run Times
Cored Rock 100%.
RM - Total Length of Sound Rock Segments Recovered
that are longer Than or Equal to 4" (mechanical
breaks exlueed) Divided by the Total Length of
HATES UYELS the Core Run Times 100%.
(Shown in Water Level Column)
- Water Level At Termination Of Boring
= water Level Taken After 24 Hours
� =Loss Of Drilling water _ SSM-,-E
X a Hole Cave
Enpineering +r Testing

PROJECT:
Bass Lake Road Lagoon
ADJ 3-3 Fars
PROJECT NO.:
1040-98-015 ELEYATW*
47.3 FEET
LOGGED BY:
FSA1
BORM 0EPTIt
3aO FEET
DATE ORbLM 06119198 WATER LEVEU 12.3 FEET (8123198
OI M131G NM00: 3 114, blis- . MULL RIC:
CAE 55
U
H S L7
a �- a
Sall Description
x itJ
G cc
c�
O .. � Z
�
DIKE FILL: Medlum Dense Orange -Brown
Slightly Clayey Fine to Medlum SAND
••
(SC). Moist
DIKE FILL: Dense Tan and
Orange -Brown Silty Fine to Medium SAND
(SM). Moist
Medlum Dense to Dense Light Gray
Medium SAND (SP). Wet
FA
Stitt Orange -Brown Silty CLAY (CL). Wet
Boring Terminated at 30.0: Water level
was measured at 12 X in P1 f207 on
6123198.
TEST BORING RECORD 13-1
NOTE$
1) Boring location Is approximate. 2)
Elevation determined from site benchmark
1 (Elev. 50 Feet). 3) Water level recorded In
adjacent plezometer.
Standard Penetration Test DataI �tl
(Blows/it) to
17,
M
Is
37
23 1
3B 1
�iANNNIIII©J
rage : 1 yr r
h
EnvirorunentM Services
Englneerhg : Testing
IF=
12 1

PROJE=. Basa Lake Road Lagoon
ADJ 3--6 Farm
PROD= NO.: 1040-98-075 ELEVAT!OFk 47.1 FEET
LOGGED 8Y: FSM BOR1NG OEPTlt 20.0 FEET
GATE MU 1 06122198 WATER LEVEL: 125 FEET
OFMI S NETHOM 3 1/4" tLS-A. MXU RIM GYE 55
U
z �
oY Sall Description roe d
rh
DIKE FILL: Loose Orange -Brown Slightly
Clayey Fine to Medium SANG (SC). Moist
DIKE FILL: Medium Dense Tan and
Orange -Brown Silty Fine to Medium SANG
(SM). Moist
Loose Black and Dark Gray Silty Medium
to SAND (SM) with Some Organics. Moist
i
i
Loose to Medium Dense Gray Medium
• SAND (SP). Wet
• - With Trace of Clay From t2' to 1T'
Is —
Strong
' - Amonla Odor In Sample obtained
I from 18.5' to 20'
20
Boring Terminated at 2o.0: water level
i was meastrred at 12.5' In P2 (207 24 hogs
after Terminatlon of Boring:
Page: I of I
TEST BORING RECORD B-2
NOTM
1) Boring location is approximate. 2)
Elevation determined trom site benchmark
(Elev. 50 Feet). 3) Water level recorded In
adiacent plezometer.
Standard Penetration Test Data
LU
W (Blows/f t 1 Ti
27
17
to
to
24
to
to
to
Environmental Services
En&eertng * Testino

Results of Hand Auger Borings
Bass Lake Road Lagoon
ADJ 3-5 Farm
Location
Depth (ft)
Description
HA-1
(6/19/98)
0-2.5
Orange brown silty sand (SM), moist
2.5-5
Gray silty sand with root hairs (SM), moist
5-6
Gray medium sand (SP), wet
Boring terminated at 6 feet
Groundwater recorded at 4 feet on 6/23/98
HA-2
(6/19/98)
0-2.5
Orange brown silty sand (SM), moist
2.5-3.5
Black organic stained silty sand with some wood
fragments (SM), moist
3.5-4
Light gray medium sand (SP), wet
4-5
Light gray clayey sand (SC), wet
Boring terminated at 5 feet
Groundwater recorded at 4 feet on 6123/98

1"SCH4
WELL CAS
BOREHOLE
SCALE.
AS SHOWN
CHECKM
DRAWN 8'Y.
TAP
OATS:
JULY 1293
J09 NO.
1040-98-075
r...� CAP
KITE SEAL FROM
FT. TO 4 Ff.
2
� u�
O
[mil 0
O in tZ
= U
� R.Lo
iL DEPTH 10 Fr.
PIEZOMETER WELL DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
osm--,
EENaINE[NlNG �tjlj O
WELL CONSTRUCTION
P1,P2 (10-)
M71ii9 ARE FR=
FMURE
NO.

1 " SCH 4
WELL CAS
BOREHOLE
PVC END CAP
iL DEPTH 20 FT.
PIEZOMETER WELL DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
00qMAMF�
00MM CLMF=
A
M N
o,
X
LL- o
J �-
O E
N
O
SCALE: AS SHMIN
SME
ElMaaw�ElfT ZErW" 1
ENgMEERII
WELL CONSTRUCTION
P 1,P2 (20')
-
FlCUFE
NO.
`
CHUCKED BY' FSM
DRAWN BY- TRP
M%i- JULY 1999
JQB NO. 1040-98-475

< 4.75 mm and >2.00 mm Silt

c 0.075 and > 0.005 mm
> 0.005 mm

0.425 mm and > 0.075 mm
< 0.075 and > 0.005 mm
> 0.005 mm

< 75 mm and > 4.75 mm Fine Sand
< 4.75 mm and >2.00 mm Silt
a 2.00 mm and > 0.425 mm Clay

March 3, 1999
MEMORANDUM
TO: [Jeffery -Brown
Environmental Engineer
Division of Water Quality
Fayetteville Regional Office
FROM: James K. Leumas, P. E. �U�✓�
State Dam Safety Engineer
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
RE: ADJ Farm Site 3-5 Swine Lagoon
Bass Lake Road Hog Lagoon
Sampson County
This is in response to your memorandum dated January 15, 1999 which was received in my
office on January 21, 1999 regarding the referenced swine lagoon dike. I have reviewed the
"Report of Geotechnical Evaluation" (the report) dated September 4, 1998 which was prepared by
S&ME, Inc. and offer the following comments:
1 . The report indicates that the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) designed the
North and South lagoon dikes and the NRCS design documentation indicates that the dikes
are low hazard. The report also indicates that the dikes range in height from five to 12 feet.
Please note that low hazard dams and dikes which are less than 15 feet in height are
exempt from the requirements of the Dam safety Law of 1967.
2. The repair plan appears to be consistent with remediation of seepage conditions at similar
facilities. It is suggested that the engineer may wish to revise Figure No. 4 to have the
drainage blanket covered with suitable topsoil and vegetated to minimize infiltration during
storm events. Also, the owner should be advised to keep trees, bushes and brush from
becoming established in the area of the drainage blanket because root systems could
damage the collector pipes.
Also, it is recommended that if HDPE pipe is to be used, that the HDPE pipe be rated as
"Heavy Duty/Highway Grade" to minimize the potential for damage to the pipe by
construction equipment or maintenance equipment. Alternatively, schedule 40 or schedule
80 PVC pipe could be considered by the engineer.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this information. Please contact me at telephone
number [phone] should you have any questions concerning the above -listed comments or if
I may be of further assistance.
JKL/
cc: William E. Vinson, Jr. (w/encl.)

AUT
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Loboralory, Report! Ground Water Qu.Oty
COUNTY:
SAMPSON
SAMPLE PRIOR"
QUAD NO,
%ROUTINE EMERGENCY
REPORTTO :
FRO Regiatal
Office Xl CHAIN OF CUSTODY
COLLECTOR(S)
: BROWN/BARNHAROT
DATE:
MMNkkpMN _
El SAMPLETYPE
TIME:
PURPOSE:
Owner: ADJ FARMS/FARM 3-5
•
Location or Site:
Description of sampling point
Sampling Method:
Remarks:
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mglL
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
CoRfotm: MF ToW 11504 1100mi
TOC mo
Turbifiry NTU
Residue., Su ed $30 mg/L
Total Suspended solids mWL
PH units
Alkalinity to PH 4.5 mg/L.
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 m9fL
Carbonau mg/L
Bicarbonate mg/L
Carbon dioxide mg/L
Chloride mg/L
Chromium: Max 1032 u&IL.
Color: True 90 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg1L
COMMENTS;
Dits. Solids 70300
mglL
Fluoride 951
mg/L
Hardness: total 900
mg/L
Hardness- (non-Aub) 902
mg/L
Phenol& 32730
u8tL
Specific Coed. 95
umho&/cm2
Sulfate
mg/L,
Sulfide 745
mg/L
MBAS
m9fL
Oil and Grease
mg/L
Silica
mg/L
Baran
Formaldehyde
mg/L
X
NH3 as N 610
0.14
mg/L
X
TKN as N 625
0.8
mg/L
X
NO2 +NO3 as n 630
0.08
mglL.
X
P: Total as P 665
0.04
mg/L
PO4
mwL
Ag-Silver 46566 US&
At -Aluminum 46557 ug1L
As-Arscnic 465$1 ug/L,
Ba•Barium 46558 ug/L.
Co -Calcium 46552 mg/L
Cd-Cadium 46559 uWL
Cr•Chramium 465M uglL
Cu-Copper 1042 ug1L
F.Ian 1045 ug/L
Ha- Mercury 71900 ug/L
K-Potassium 46555 mg/L
Mg- Magnesium 927 mg/L
Mn-Manganese 105$ ug/L
No- Sodium 929 mglL
Ni-Nickel ug/L
Pb-Lead 46564 ug/L
Se -Selenium ug1L
Zn_Zinc 46567 ug/L
L.bNmnber 9G0603
Date Received 03.19.19"
Time Received : 9;35
Received By DS
Released By : DS
Date reported: 844164
Orgarwchlerine Pesticides
Organopho&phorw Pesticides
Nitrogen Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
I ITPH.Diesel Rana
Gasoline
Ki000S.1at:li

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Cbemislry Laboratory Repo" I Granted Water Quagty
COUNTY:
SAMPSON
SAMPLE PRIORITY
QUAD NO:
FKIROUTINE
EMERGENCY
REPORTTO :
FRO
Regional Office
Xl
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
COLLECTOR(S)
: BROWNIBARNNARDT
Z
DATE:
El
SAMPLE TYPE
TIME:
�ANgW1MONO
PURPOSE:
Owner:
AD.1 FARMSIFARM3.5
Location of Site:
Description of sampling point
Sampling Method:
Remarks:
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
BOD 31 D M&L
COD High 340 mglL
COD Low 335 mg1L.
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 IIODml
Coliform: MFTola131504 1100ml
TOC mgA
Turbitity NTU
Residue., Suspended 53D mall
Total Suspended solids mglL
pH units
Alkalinity to pH 4, 5 MAIL
Alkalinity to pH 8-] mgrL.
Carbonate me/L
Bicarbonate mall.
Carbon dioxide ma/L
Chloride MWL
Chromium: Hex 1032 uglL
Color. Trua 80 c.u.
Cyanide 720 mglL
Din. Solids 70300
mg/L
Fluoride 951
mg1L
Hardness, fatal 900
mglL
Hardnen:(non-carb)902
mg/L
Phenols 32730
ug/L
Specific Cond. 95
urnhoskm2
Sulfate
mg1L
Sulfide 74S
mglL
MBAS
mg1L
Oil and Grease
mSIL
Silica
mg/L.
Boron
Formaldehyde
mg/L
X
NH3 nN 610
76
ma/L
X
TKN as N 625
80
mg/L
X
NO2 +NO3 m n 630
1.8
mglL
X
P: Total as P 665
D.02
rnWL
PO4
mg1L
COMMENTS:
a
Ag-Silver 46566 ug/L
At -Aluminum 46557 ug/L
As -Arsenic 46551 ULL—
Ba-Bariurn 46158 u811..
Ca -Calcium 46552 mglL
Cd-Cadium 46559 uglL.
0-Chromium 46560 ug/L
Cu- Copper 1042 ug/L
Fe. Iron 1045 ug/L
Hg- Mercury 71900 ug/L
K-Potassium 46555 mall.
Mg- Magnesium 927 mg1L
Mn•mmitanese 1055 ua/L
Na- Sodium 929 mgJL
Ni-Nickel ug/L
Ph -Lead 46564 uglL
Se- Selenium ugrl.
Zn Zinc 46567 ugIL
Lab Number
9GO604
Date Received
: 03-19-19"
Time Received
: 9;35
Received By
DS
Rvicased By : DS
Date reported : 044)9-1
Organachlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Nilrogen Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Gasoline
a00aarACH

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
CAemislry Laboratory Report I Ground Water Quality
COUNTY: SAMPSON SAMPLE PRIORITY
QUAD NO: El ROUTINE EMERGENCY
REPORT TO : FRO Regiona1011ice X❑ CHAIN OF CUSTODY
COLLECfOR(S) : BROWN/BARNHARDT .i
DATE: IfNl11p7MA11 SAMPLETYPE
TIME:
PURPOSE: Owner: ADJ FARMSIFARM 3.5
Location or Sae:
Description of umpiimg point
Sampling Method:
Remarks:
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
BOD 310 mg/l.
�r
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Colifamt: MP Feeal31616 /100m1
Coli(Drm: MF Total 31504 ADDml
TOC mgA
Turbitity NTU
Residue., Suspended 530 mg/L
Total Suspended solids mg/L
pH units
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 mglL
Alkalinity to pH 8 3 mg/L
Carbonate mg/L
Bicarbonate mg/L
Carbon dioxide mg/L
Chloride mg/L
Chromium: Hex 1032 ug/L
Color: True 90 CAN
Cyanide 720 mg/L
COMMENTS;
Dits. SDlids 70300
mg/L
Fluoride 951
mg/L
Hardness: total 900
mg(L
Hardness: (non-carb) 9D2
mg/L
Phenols 32730
ug/L
Specific Cond. 95
umhos/em2
Sulfate
mg/L
Sulfide 745
mg1L
MBAS
mg/L
Oil and Grease
mg1L
Silica
mg/L
Boron
Formaldehyde
mglL
X
NH3 as N 610
0.04
mg/L
X
TKN as N 625
01
mg/L
X
NO2 +NO3 u n 630
0.48
mg/L
X
P: Total as P 663
0.03
mg/L
PO4
mg/L
A Silver46566 u
Al -Aluminum 46557 ug/L
AFArsenic 46551 u&%
OR -Barium 465511 ug/L
Ca -Calcium 46552 rnlyll-
Cd-Cadium 46559 uglL-
Cr-Chromium 46560 ug/L
Cu. Capper 1042 ug(L
Fe- Iron I D45 ug/L
Hg- Mercury 71900 uWL
K-Potassium 46555 mg/L
Mg- Mapesium 927 mgfL
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/L
Na- Sodium 929 mg/L
Ni-Nickel ug/L
Pb-L Lad 46564 ugli-
Se-Selenium ug/L
Zn Zinc 46567 OWL
Lab Number 9GO605
Date Received 03-IS-19"
Time Received : 9;35
Received By DS
Released By : DS
Data reported : 04.0141999
Organochlorine Pesticides
2Lganopbasphwus Pesticides
Nitrogen Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Gasoline
a60005 W-K

COUNTY: SAMPSON
QUAD NO:
REPORTTO : FRO Regional Office
COLLECTOR(S) : BROWNARARNHARDT
DATE: MNMMAItNM
TIME
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Cheasistry Laboratory Report! Ground Water Quality
SAMPLE PRIORITY
[K]ROUTINE EMERGENCY
X❑ CHAIN OF CUSTODY ❑
4
0 SAMPLETYPE
PURPOSE: Owner. ADJ FARMS
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Law 335 mg1L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
Coliferm:MPToWa 1504 1100m1
TOC mgrl
Turbitity NTU
Residue., Suspended 530 mg/L
Total Suspended solids mg/L
pH units
Alkalinity to pH 43 mg/L
Alkalinity m pH 83 mg/L
Carbonate mg/L
Bicarbonate mg/L
Carbon dioxide mg/L
Cmonac mg/L
Chromium: Hex 1032 ukVL
Color: True 80 c,u.
Cyanide 720 miVL
COMMENTS t
i
Location OF Site:
Description of sampling point
Sampling Method:
Remarks:
Dias. Solids 70300
mg/L
Fluoride 951
mgll.
Hardness: total 900
mg/L
Hardnpe.(non-corb)902
mg/L
Phenols 32730
ug/L
Specific Cond. 95
umhos/em2
Sulfate
mg/L
Sulfide 745
mg/L
MBAS
mg/L
Oil and Grease
m
Silica
mg1L
Boron
Formaldehyde
mg/L
X
NH3 as N 610
716
mStL
X
TKN as N 625
9.2
mg/L
X
NO2 *NO3 as n 630
1.3
mg/L
X
P: Total as P 665
0.03
mg/L
PO4
mg/L
Ail -Silver 46566 ug/L
AI -Aluminum 46557 ug/L
As -Arsenic 46551 u8l1.
Ba-Barium 46558 uglL.
Ca -Calcium 46552 mg/L
Cd•Codium 46559 ug/L
Cr-Chromium 46560 ug1L
Cu-Capper 1042 ug/L
Fe- Iron 1045 ug/L
Hg- Mercury 71900 uglL
K-Potassium 46555 mg/L
Mg- Magnesium 927 mg/L
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/L
Na- Sodium 929 mg1L
Ni-Nickel ug/L
Pb-Lead 46564 uglL
Se -Selenium ug/L
2.n_2inc 46567 ug/L
Lab Number : 9GO606
Date Received : 03-19-3
Time Received ; 9;35
Received By DS
Released By : DS
Date reported : 044)b1
Orgmnchlorine Pesticides
Orgartophosphonu Pesticides
Nitrogen Pesticides
Acid
Gasoline
oGNMUCH

A
ih 44,r- ds4c�
:.���,_�p,
G(.u�'oR't �.a.1� .ee 4 voG.�s'✓1 .

FAYEITEVILLE VMSION
917 Castle Hayne Street Fayetteville. NC 28303 Phone [phone] ` Fax [phone]
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PAGE OF
n3T KAM & ADDRESS:s
ve
ae? 5 Grres—� s�.
WWT l LOCATtara
r 407
$ of
a
o
T
t
E
s
TYPE
OF ANALYSIS
PRESERVATION CODE
V
CODE: A a -WC ONLY
B a HNO3 (ph<4 + 44'C
c - H2,504 4*c2) + w•C
D s N*OH + -WC
E - ZN Acdabe + 4CC
F m
wy PFRaom
,, fro
MOMT
JwpL Ete
r-7 'V, Var0 W Y1
DATE 1 uffnio) OF pS
LAB ID 0
SAMPLE TYPE
DATE
TIME
cwtr
cl<RAa
Pt
oro
tpJtP'C
CN OR
r.A4A
Arz,
%� • (stg+w 1
Time
RacaNaq W I3+9MMre)
o■a
Time
2
me
RocetvW by 1 nM16)
Data
Ttma
3
4
ngmhw by Ifgnowm)
aearatl brr, Iftnatural
Data
Ima
5
6
Wutahad by; (Signature)
TIme
R* Mved by 15iGnature)
Data T
TibN
7
8
Comments or Special Hazards:

•— . _ wti'
COUNTY:
QUAD NO:
SAMPSON
REPORTTO : FRO
COLLECTOR(S) : ➢ROWNIBARN1fARDT
DATE: MHHMIklNq
nme
PURPOSE:
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report I Ground Water Quality
SAMPLE PRIORITY
-Y�ROUTINE EMERGENCY
Regional Office X❑ CHA[N OF CUSTODY ❑
1
W SAMPLE TYPE
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD I-aw 335 mg/L
Colifarm: MF Fecal 31616 11001111
Coliform�MFTotal 31504 /10DmI
TOC Me
Turbitity NTU
Residue, Suspended 530 mglL
Total Suspended solids mg/L
PH units
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH B.3 mg/L
Carbonate mg/L
Bicarbonate mg7L
Carbon dioxide mgfL
Chloride mg/L
Chromium: Hcx 1032 ug/L
Color: True BO C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
COMMENTS;
Owner:
Location or Site:
Description of sampling point
Sampling Method:
Remarks:
AD] FARMS/FARM 3-5
Digs. Solids 70300
mglL
Fluoride 951
mg/L
Hardness: total 9W
mg/L
Hardness: (non-carb) 902
mg/L
Phenals 32730
ug/L
Specific Cond. 95
umhos/am2
Sulfate
mg/L
Sulfida 745
MWL
MRAS
mg/L
Oil and Grease
mg/L
Silica
mgiL
Boron
Formaldehyde
mglL
X
NH3 as N 610
0.14
mg1L
X
TKN as N 62$
0.6
mg/L
X
NO2 +NO3 as n 630
0.06
mg/L
?[
P: Total as P 665
0,04
mg/L
PO4
mg/L-
Ag-Silver 46566 ug/L
AI -Aluminum 46557 ug/L
As -Arsenic 46551 ugfl-
Ba-Barium 46558 ug/L
Ca -Calcium 46552 mg/L
Cd-Cadium 46559 ug/L
Cr-Chromium 46560 USIL
Cu- Copper IG42 ug/L
Fe- Iron 1045 ug/L
Hg- Mercury 71900 ugfL
K-Potassium 46555 mg/L
Mg- Magnesium 927 mg/L
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/L
No- Sodium 929 mglL
N i-Nickel ug/L
Pb-Lead 46364 ug(L
S"clenium ug/L
Zn Zinc 46567 UwL
LabNumber : 9GO603
Date Received
: 03-19-1999
11
Time Received
9;35
Received By
DS
Released By : DS
Date reported: "41& 1
Organochiorina Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
N itroiten Pesticides
I Acid Herbicides I
honle)
TPH•BTEX Gasoline Ranee I
9Go603 MCrt

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemislry Laboratory Report / Ground Water Quality
COUNTY:
SAMPSON
SAMPLE PRIORITY
QUAD NO:
Ej ROUTINE
EMERGENCY
REPORTTO :
FRO Regional Office
l CHAIN OF CUSTODY
COLLECTOR(S)
. BROWNIBARNHARDT
2
DATE:
#No#"##
7 SAMPLETYPE
TIME:
PURPOSE:
Owner:
ADJ FARMSIFARh13.5
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Law 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 1100ml
Coliform: MF Total 31504 1100ml
TOC mall
Turhitity NTU
Residue., Suspended 530 mglL
Total Suspended solids mg/l-
pH units
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 mglL
Carhonare mg/L
Bicarbonate m9tL
Ctubon dioxide mg/L
Chloride mgfL
Chromium: Flax 1032 ugll.
Color: True BD au.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
COMMENTS:
Lacalion or Site: .�.
Description of sampling point
Sampling Method:
Remarks
Dist, Solids 703DO ----
ma/L
Pluoride 951
mg/L
Hardness total 900
mglL
Hardness: (ran-carb) 902
mWL
Phennls 32730
ug/L
Specific Cond, 95
umhos/cm2
Sulfate
mg1L
Sulfide 745
mglL
WAS
mglL
Oil and Grease
mStL
Silica
mg/L
Boron
Formaldehyde
mg/L
X
N143 as N 610
76
mg/L
X
TKN as N 625
BD
mg/L
X
NO2 +NO3 as n 630
1.8
mg/L
X
P: Total as P 665
0.02
mg/L
P64
mg1L
Ag-Sitver 46566 ug/L
AI -Aluminum 46557 ug1L
As -Arsenic 46551 ug+L
Ba-Barium 46558 ug/L
Ca-Cakcium 46552 mg/L
Cd•Cadium 46559 ug/L
Cr-Chromium 46560 ug/L
Cu- Copper1042 ug/L
Fe- Iron 1045 ug/L
){g- Mercury 71900 ug/L
K-Potassium 46555 malL
Mg- Magnesium 927 mmA,
Mn-Manganese 1055 USIL
Na- Sodium 929 m&iL
Ni-Nickel ug/l-
Pb-Lead 46564 ug/L
S"alenium ug/L
Zn_Zinc 46567 uglL
Lab Number 9GO604
Date Received :
03.19-199
Time Received
9;35
Received By
DS
Released By : DS
Date reported : 04.0&1
Organochlarine Pesticides
Organaphasphorus Pesticides
Nitrogen Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
le
I ITPH-BTEX Gasoline Range I
9GOBOI.MCH

COUNTY: SAMPSON
QUAD NO:
REPORTTO : FRO
COLLECTOR(S) ; RROWN/BARNHARDT
DATE: MANNNNNN
TIME;
PURPOSE:
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report Ground Water Quality
SAMPLE PRIORITY
X1ROUTINE EMERGENCY
Regions! Office X❑ CHAIN OF CUSTODY ❑
J SAMPLETYPE 3
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 m6fL
Coliform: MF Fee&[ 31616 1100ml
Coliform: MP Total 31504 fl OOml
TOC MO
'Furbitity NTU
Residue., Suspended 53D mgfL
Total Susm Suspended solids g/L
pH units
Alkalinity 10 pH 4,5 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 mg/1,
Carbonate mg/L
Bicarbonate mg/L
Carbon dioxide mg/L
Chloride mg/L
Chromium: Hex 1032 ug/L
Color. True 80 c.u,
Cyanide 720 mg/L
COMMENTS:
Owner: A FARMSIFARM3.5
Location or Site:
Description of sampling point
Sampling Method;
Remarks:
Dins, Solids 70300
mg/L
Fluoride 951
mg/L
Hardness: fatal 900
mg/L
Hardness: (non-carh) 902
mg/L
Phenols 32730
ug/L
Specific Cond, 95
umhos/em2
Sulfate
mgfL
Sulfide 745
mg/L
MBAS
mg/L
Oil and Grease
m8/L
Silica
mg/L
Baron
Formaldehyde
mgfL
X
NH3 os N 610
0.04
mg/L
X
TKN as N 625
0.3
mgfL
X
NO2+NO3 as n 630
0.48
mg/L
X
P: Total as P 665
0.03
mg/L
PO4
mg/L
Ag-Silver 46566 ug/L
AI -Aluminum 46557 ug/L
As -Arsenic 46551 ug/L
Ba-Barium 4655g ug/L
Ca -Calcium 46552 mglL
Cd-Cadium 46359 ug/L
Cr-Chromium 46560 ug/L
Cu- Copper 1042. ug/L
Fe Iron 1045 ug/L
Hg- Mercury 71900 ug/L
K-Potassium 46555 mg/L
Mg- Magnesium 927 mg/L
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/L
No- Sodium 929 mg/L
Ni-Nickel ug/L.
Pb-Lead 46564 ug/L
Se -Selenium u8/L
Zn Zinc46567 ug/I.
Lab Number 9GO605
Date Received
03.19-1"
Time Received :
9;35
Received By
DS
Released By : DS
Date reported : 04-08.1
0r8..hlorine Pesticides
Organophosphoms Pesticides
Nitrogen Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Semivolatiles
TPH-Diesel Range
Volatile Organics (VOA bottle)
TPH-Gasoline Range
TPH-BTEX Gasoline Rance
000005.MCH

COUNTY:
QUAD NO:
SA141PSON
RF.PORTTO : FRO Regional Office
COLLECTOR(S) : BROWNIBARNIIARDT
DATE: 222
TIME:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report I Ground Water Quality
SAMPLE PRIORITY
1X ROUTINE EMERGENCY
C14A1N OF CUSTODY ❑
l SAMPLE TYPE 4
PURPOSE: Owner. ADJ FARMS
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/I..
COD Low 335 mg/L
Colifarm: MF Fecal 31616 II00ml
Cotiform: MF Total 31504 400m]
TOC mg/L
Turbitiry NTU
Residua, Suspended 530 mg/L
Total Suspended solids mg/L
pit units
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 mg/L
Alkalinity to PH 13.3 mg/L
Carbonate mg/L
Bicarbonate mg/L
Carbon dioxide mg/L
Chloride mgfL
Chromium: Hex 1032 ug/L
Color: Two 80 CM.
Cyanide 720 mg/L.
COMMENTS:
Location ar Site:
Description of sampling point
Sampling Method:
Remarks:
Diu, Solids 70300
mg/L
Fluoride 951
mg/L
Hardness: total9W
mg/L
Hardness: (non -cart) 902
mg/L
Phenols32710
uglL
Specific Cond. 95
umhos/cm2
Sulfate
mWL
Sulfide 745
mg/L
MBAS
mg/L
Oil and Grease
mg/L
Silica
mg/L
Boron
Formaldehyde
mg/L
X
NH3 as N 610
7.6
mg/L
X
TKN as N 625
9.2
mg/L
X
NO2 +NO3 as n 630
1.3
mg/L
X
P: Total as P 665
0.03
mg/L
PO4
mgfL
AS-Silver46566 ._.. uglL
AI -Aluminum 46557 ug1L
As -Arsenic 46$51 ugfL
Ba-Barium 46559 ug/L
Ca -Calcium 46552 mg/L
Cd-Cadium 46559 ugJL
Ce-Chromium 46560 ug/L
Cu- Copper 1042 ug/L
Fe- Iron 1045 ug/L
llg- Mercury 71900 ug/L
K-Potassium 46555 mg/L
Mg- Magnesium 927 mgfL
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/L
No- Sodium 929 mg/L
Ni-Nickel ug/L
Pb-Lead 46564 ug/L
Se -Selenium ug/I,
Zn_Zinc 46567 ugfL
Lab Number
9GO606
pate Received :
03-19.19"
Time Received
105
Received By
DS
Released By
DS
Date reponed :
04-08-199
Organochlarine Pesticides
Organophosphoms Pesticides
Nitrogen Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Semivolatiles
TPH-Diesel Range
Volatile Organics (VOA bottle)
TPH-Gasoline Rangc
TPH-BTEX Gasoline Range
900606.MCH

�IlI�,� �ti q- F�cr►�
Ns� p �o.oa Am
r
DkmWe ?E
1

I —
Draft Interpretations to Air Quality Questions
1. Pipes discharging wastes into the lagoon must be extended beneath the surface of the
lagoon to avoid releasing gases from agitated wastes.
.•,„ �J ,war � a. ,,,,as,..,, Q.�...` '(�� ,,,,,, , r limn DP.. r J'� V.►a.#-4�+
2. Dead animals must be placed in covered dead box or buried withiln 24 hours afte� r
knowledge of the death of said domesticated animal according to the methods
approved by the State Veterinarian for disposing of dead domesticated animals G.S.
106-403. Refrigeration of dead animals is acceptable temporary storage until
rendering truck is available.
3. Evidence of wind drift should include visible residue located on a neighbor's property
such as vegetation, asphalt, and building structures.
4. Intake pipes for effluent removal must be placed in the aerobic layer of liquid
approximately 18 inches below the surface. A floating intake may be used. This may
not be evident, but use best judgement. Farms using exclusively honey wagons, will
not be affected by this question.
5. Maintenance problems should include visible items, which prevent operation (i.e.
broken belt(s), missing or broken blade(s), etc.)
6. Animal feed storage bins and silage storage areas located outside of houses, barns,
and milking parlors must have a temporary or permanent cover. P,-f-.S
7. Animal flush tanks must either have cover or pipe extended to bottom of flush tank.
Either method is sufficient. A properly maintained tarp is acceptable as a cover if it is
effective in reducing odors.

10" r`%
'Z�jig4ED 8y
Draft it QualityInspection Questions
Please remember that a c eck is an indication of compliance and a yes check indicated
a problem or potential problem. This is to keep consistent with the other questions on the
visitation form.
Yes No
1. Does the discharge pipe fail to discharg4elo the
liquid level of lagoo;�;;.'-, V-4 wrk'f- .,
2. Are there any carcasses or signs of carcasses not
disposed of properly within 24 hours?
3. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land
application?77 residue on neighboring vegetation,
asphalt, and/or building structures)
4. Is the land application spray system intake not
located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? _
5. Were any major maintenance problems with the
ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts,
missing or broken fan blade(s), etc.)
P'40e,
6. Do the animal feed storage bins fail to have
appropriate cover?
7. Do the Bush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a
permanent/temporary cover?
rl( lr4-1 d. A.
VVIr
dlo-

Division of Environmental Management
GROUNDWATER SECTION
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
For Investigation of amm2/ GwA. 3-5 Incident Not��
Samples collected and GW-54 forms completed by: ��*+
Lab Only
Lab No.
Quad
No.
Location
Date
Time
No. of
Containers
32
�c PAM
o
RECEIVED
REG, 01
TICE
Relinqu'
y[$f at re
ece' ed byCSign
red:
to/jjme
Rel.
Rec. by
/
Rel.
Rec. by
/
Rel.
Rec. by
/
Method of Shipment:
Seal by:
Security Type and Condition: Lock by:
Broken by:
Open by:
I e R IMP nnii v
From ThrouQh
Relinquished �y
Received by
Date Time
MA.0T1__,VaFW
W'wjiduol
UP
Note: Original sent with shipment
GW-63 Copy retained by collector

.�I 1
DIVISION OF WATER QUALM
CbendWT Labwsko Report 1 Ground Wrier Quality
COUNTY : "MPSON SAMPLE ERIOR_f1�
QUAD NO: FIRGUTINE II]EMERGENCY
REPORT TO FRO ReAirnal O(lirr El CHAIN OF CUSTODY ❑
COI.LECfORls7 : PIH[.L1PS
DATE: 9/2119lt SAMPLE TYPE
TIME;
PURPOSE: Owua: ADM FARMS COHAiRE
I oc+rlm at Site.
Dcscrip W of u%v q Pan
Sempliq Metbod;
Remarks:
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
800 310
COD High 340 m
COD Law 335 m
Coliform: MF Fccal 31616 S 1100m1
Cditmm: MFToW 31504 71DOm1
TOC MAA
T NTU
Residue. $30 m
Taw sails L
>i urriq
lAlway to plf4.3 m
JA]Wiztisy to ptig.3 m
Cubmats m#1L
Bicubonste m
Carbon dloslde m /L
Chloride m L
Chromium: ilex 1032 u
Color: True 80 c.u.
ankle 720 m
COMM XM s
Diu. Solidr 70]00
MAI
Fiuoride 951
MAI
liudaess: rata1goo
m
Hardness: (nan-cub) 902
m L
Men* 32730
WRIL
ilk Cord. 95
um .W.2
Sulfite
m
Sulfde 745
mgiL
MBAS
mgil,
Oil and Grease
mSIL
Silica
m L
Boron
Famsaldeh
m !L
X
N113 u N 610
2000
m L
X
TKN as N 625
3201
m /L
X
NO2 +NO3 as a 630
0.09 •
m
X
P: Total as P 665
0.04'
m L
PO4
m L
A -Silva 46W u
AI-Ahumh m 46557 Uzi
As -Arcane 46551 u
Ba-Barium 46556
Ca -Calcium 46352 m
Cd•Cad um 46.559 u
Cr lrcxnium 46560 ull
Cu- Copper 1042 u
Fe- Imo 1045 u&IL
11 - Mercwy 7t900 ull
K-Patuitum 46555 m
Ms- Magnesium 927 /I.
Ma -Man anew 1055 ugfL
Na- Sodium W9 m L
Ni-Nickel u /L
Pb-Lead 46564 u 1.
Se-Selcnitm u 1.
Zn Zinc 46567 u
Lab Number SG2139
Dare Reaived ;
9/23/m
Time Received :
9;30
Received By
DS
Rcleased By : DS
Dare rcpunW : 10l11190
Or hlocise Pestkides
Or Putkidn
N' en Pessklda r p4s
Acid Herbki&j
Serrrivolatiles I c `^
TPH-Diesel Ran e
Volatile Or anla (VOA bone)
TPH-Guolim Rage
TPH-BTEX Gasdirc Rune
+aes3r.f0

•- N-GROUNDWATER
FIELDfLAB FORM
ad
nly__. _ SAMPLE TYPE SAMPLE PAIORITY
No Serial No. ® Water ❑ Routine
Lal. Long. ❑ Soll 0 Emergency
❑ Other
Report To: ARO. RO MRO; RRO; WaRO, WiRO, hale o1 Custody
WSRO. Kinston FO .Trust. Central Off., Other.
Shipped by: Bus rier Hand Del.. Other
-� Purpose:
Collect0r(s):Date Time _ `� Mom Baseline, ConlF
pH400 ------._Spec. Cond.94 ___ at 25o C
Temp.1, cc Odor
Appearance
Field Analysis By:
North Carottna
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
DIVISION OF WATER OUALITY - GROUNDWATER SECTION
Lab Number
0 Date Recelyed Time Ci
Rec'd by,— From: Bus ourier Hand Del.,
Other.
Data Entry By: ' Ck:
Date Reported:
pesticide Study, Federal Tnad. Other.
Location ar ails '�'n r �, 3 ; I, r 5 awn SR 13nA n�r►�tTt71 1p . 5r, .�r]1Ca.
Description of sampling point
Sampling Method Sample interval �' Xet ar - 24
Remarks
HOD 310 m
A - !PVer 46566 UPA I
Or anochiorine Pesticides
COD High 340 mg/I
Flouride 051 m 4
Al - Aluminum 46551 u A
Organophosphorus Peslicides
COD Low 335 m 11
r121WAs
- Arsenic 46551 u A
Nilr en Pesticides
Colilorm: MF Fecal moleItODmI
Hardness o rb m A
Ba - Barium 46558 u /1
Acid Herbicides
Colilorm: MF Total miN ItoOml
ehenoll 327a Will
Ca - Calcium 46552 m 11
PCB's
TOO wo m
,
Sullale 945 WRA
C - Cadmium 4655 u
Cr - Chromium 46560 u 11
Tuibidily 16 NTtJ
Residue., Suspended s30 mg/l
Sulfide 745 MIACu
- Copper 46562 u 11
Fe - Iron 46563 UgA
Semivolatile Organks
Oil and Grease I
1n
1i - Mercur A 71900 u
TPH - Diesel Range
pH 403 unit
I(- PalaSsium 46555 m II
Alkalinil to H 4 6 410 mgA
M . Ma nesium 46554 m 11
Alkalinil to H 8.3 4% m !
Mn - Manganese 46565 UCIA
Carbonale 445 mgll
N s610 RNA
Na - Sodium 46550 m 1l
Volatile Organics (VOA boltla
picarbonale 440 A
625
O O as N MQA
TPH - Gasoline Ran
Carbon dloxEde 405 m
Pb --Lead 46564 u A
-go
TPH - BTEX Gasolire Range
Chloride 940 mgA
p- Total as p 665 n
Se -Selenium u A
Chromium: Hex ion u
Zn - Zinc 46567 u n
Color., True so CU
Cyanlde 720 mgA
JL
Lab Comments:
aw-54 REV.For Dissolved Analysis - subMl Ilitared sample and wrlla'DIS' in l " r
fir: �; ', ! �;,. ,w'. e.,.a,'. yl ,.

x [ ,��
WCDENR
.• ; :_fix,.:,-;
•' JAMES B. HUHTti.I
-. GOVERNOR
wAYF1E MCi3SHIT+-1- ,,-t
.w v
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 5, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Wayne Cannady
1366 Bass Lake Road
Roseboro, NC 28382
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
ADJ Hog Farm 3-5
Registration No. 82 - 72
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Cannady:
On May 18, 1998, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division
of Water Quality inspected the ADJ Farm 3-5 swine facility. It was observed that
there was some standing water at the base of lagoon dam. The water flowed into
a drainage ditch between the lagoon and the back spray field. A sample was taken
at the point where the water entered the drainage ditch. Since the sample detected
that waste was in the water a second visit was made to the farm on May 26 of the
following week. More samples were taken at various locations in order to
determine if indeed the lagoon was seeping. The lab results indicated that the
lagoon had a seepage problem. It was also observed that the back spray field -
failed to have a crop for irrigation of wastewater.
In regard to the deficiencies noted during the inspection, the following actions
are requested:
1. Since indeed the lagoon seems to have a seepage problem, it is obvious that
corrective actions need to be taken immediately. Our office request that you send
us a letter as to what actions you propose for correcting the problem. A
temporary solution also needs to be addressed in order to prevent wastewater from
leaving the farm site.
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/109e' POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
ADJ Farm
June 5, 1998
2. Consult with a technical specialist for assistance in establishing a crop in the back spray field for
the irrigation of wastewater..
Please provide a written response to this office on or before June 19, 1998 regarding corrective
actions taken or planned. Nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving this facility of the
responsibility and liability of any violations that have or may result from these deficiencies. If you
have any questions concerning this matter, please call Jeffery Brown, at [phone].
Sincerely,
1?k yulw�
Jeffery Brown
Environmental Engineer
cc: Operations Branch
Central Files
Audrey Oxendine - FRO DSWC
Wilson Spencer - Sampson Co. NRCS
Coharie Farms

�+
FA
NCDENR �y
i, JAME9 B. HUNTiJR•r � •'
sx _
'-z
.WAYNE MCDEVITT
SECRETARY. �=rE
gip , v. Ft,
I"
r
I
+!
s
ice.".+4=f''.�-y:�Sa.`�1�,.;;y:.'.�-'.'^,^•"t
�::�-�: air'•. w�`_
' NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 5, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Wayne Cannady
1366 Bass Lake Road
Roseboro, NC 283 82
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
ADJ Hog Farm 3-5
Registration No. 82 - 72
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Cannady:
On May 18, 1998, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division
of Water Quality inspected the ADJ Farm 3-5 swine facility. It was observed that
there was some standing water at the base of lagoon dam. The water flowed into
a drainage ditch between the lagoon and the back spray field. A sample was taken
at the point where the water entered the drainage ditch. Since the sample detected
that waste was in the water a second visit was made to the farm on May 26 of the
following week. More samples were taken at various locations in order to
determine if indeed the lagoon was seeping. The lab results indicated that the
lagoon had a seepage problem. It was also observed that the back spray field -
failed to have a crop for irrigation of wastewater.
In regard to the deficiencies noted during the inspection, the following actions
are requested:
1. Since indeed the lagoon seems to have a seepage problem, it is obvious that
corrective actions need to be taken immediately. Our office request that you send
us a letter as to what actions you propose for correcting the problem_ A
temporary solution also needs to be addressed in order to prevent wastewater from
leaving the farm site.
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTM CAROLINA 26301-5043
PNoNE 510-496-1541 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFERMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
ADJ Farm
June 5, 1998
2. Consult with a technical specialist for assistance in establishing a crop in the back spray field for
the irrigation of wastewater..
Please provide a written response to this office on or before June 19, 1998 regarding corrective
actions taken or planned. Nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving this facility of the
responsibility and liability of any violations that have or may result from these deficiencies. If you
have any questions concerning this matter, please call Jeffery Brown, at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jeffery Brown
Environmental Engineer
cc. Operations Branch
Central Files
Audrey Oxendine - FRO DSWC
Wilson Spencer - Sampson Co. NRCS
Coharie Farms

DRAFT
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT
Bass Lake Road Hog Lagoon
At
ADJ 3-5 Farm
Clinton, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1040-99-075

August 5, 1998
ADJ Farms, Inc.
1366 Bass Lake Road
Roseboro, North Carolina 28382
Attention: Mr. Jeff Warren
Reference: Report of Geotechnical Evaluation
Bass Lake Road Hog Lagoon at ADJ 3-5
xx:"�
Clinton, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1040-98-075
Dear Jet£
As requested, S&ME, Inc. has completed the geotechnical evaluation of the hog waste lagoon dikes at
the ADJ 3-5 Farm. The purpose of our study was to evaluate wet surface conditions with respect to
seepage and duce stability and to provide recommendations for additional drainage or dike stabilization
measures that may be needed. This report presents the results of our field work, laboratory tests and
engineering analysis along with our conclusions and recommendations.
S&ME, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have any
questions regarding this report or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact us at [phone].
Sincerely,
S&ME, INC.
F. Sean McGrath, P.E. Dr. Dan Marks, Ph-D., P.E.
Geotechnical Engineer Chief Geotechnical Consultant
N.C. Registration No. 19784 N.C. Registration No. 9631
Attachments

■
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION....................................................................................--1
2.0 FIELD EXPLORATION ................ ... ..................................... ..................................... ...2
3.0 LABORATORY TESTING............................................................................................3
4.0 SITE CONDITIONS...................................................................................................... 3
5.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS......................................................................................4
6.0 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS ...... ............... »................. ................ ................................. ...5
6.1 SEEPAGE .........................................:........ .<r.................................................. S
6.2 SLOPE STABII.lIY ..................................................................................... $
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECO ONS........................................................ „ 6
APPENDICES
I Fgures
II Test Boring and Piezometer Records
III Laboratory Test Results

1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION DIR
Project information was provided by Mr. Jeff Warren of ADJ Farms. This information included
design plan and cross section drawings as well as "Waste Management System" design
documentation prepared by USDA Soil Conservation Service (currently NRCS). The lagoons are
located on the east side of existing hog houses and range in size from about 39,300 square feet
(southern lagoon) to about 70,600 square feet (northern lagoon). We understand the northern
lagoon was constructed in 1992 and the southem lagoon was constructed in 1994. Both
impoundments were created by a.combination of excavation and construction of earthen perimeter
dikes. The dikes range in height from about 5 to 12 feet above the original ground surface and
were designed with 3(H):1(V) slopes. We understand an effort was made during construction to
place at least a 12 inch thick layer of clayey sand along the upstream slopes to reduce seepage.
Information contained in the "Waste Management System" documents indicate the dikes are
classified as low hazard dams.
It is our understanding that during a routine annual inspection, representatives of the Water
Quality Section of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(NCDENR), Fayetteville Division, obtained samples of ponded surface water near the
downstream dike toe at the southeast comer of the northern lagoon. Water samples were
subsequently tested for fecal coliform. Test results indicated fecal coliform levels ranging from 80
co /100 ml to 6,150 co1/100 ml. Based on the results, the Division of Water Quality requested
that ADJ farms further evaluate seepage conditions in the vicinity of the northern lagoon and
potential impacts of seepage on dike stability. They also recommended that ADJ Farms
implement appropriate methods to prevent off -site discharge of water containing high fecal
/ coliform levels.
According to Mr. Jeff Warren of ADJ Farms, wet ground surface conditions existed on the east.
side of the northern lagoon prior to lagoon construction. information contained within the
"Waste Management System" documents indicates a seasonal high water table elevation of about
36 feet within the lagoon perimeter which would place groundwater levels at or near the existing
ground surface during wetter periods of the year.
1

K'A
2.0 FIELD ENII.oRATIo1v
A site reconnaissance was performed by Mr. Sean McGrath, P.E. of.S&ME, Inc. to evaluate
general surface features in the vicinity of the lagoons. During the reconnaissance, locations for
soil borings and piezometers were selected. Once established, locations of borings, piezometers
and nearby surface features were determined by representatives of S&ME, Inc. by measuring
distances and estimating right angles from existing site features. Ground surface elevations in the
vicinity of borings ("including dike slopes) were determined using surveying methods. All
elevations were based on an existing site benchmark which ADJ Farms has _assumed to be
elevation 50 feet. Locations of borings, piezometers and nearby site features are shown on Figure
1 in Appendix I. Horizontal distances should be considered approximate.
To evaluate the general consistency of embankment and foundation soils, two soil test borings
were advanced to depths ranging from 20 to 30 feet along the crest of the east dike of the
northern lagoon. At each boring location, piezometers were installed to depths of 10 and 20 feet
to evaluate phreatic conditions. The 20 foot piezometer at the location of boring B-1 was
installed in a separate borehole (i.e., not within the 30 foot soil test boring). In addition to soil
test borings and piezometers, two hand auger borings were advanced near the toe of the dike
slope to observe general soil types and water levels.
The soil test borings and piezometer holes were advanced using hollow stem auger drilling
procedures with a CME 55 truck mounted drill. Within soil test borings, samples of subsurface
soils were taken at 2-112 foot interva4above a depth of 10 feet and at 5 foot intervals below 10
A
feet using a split -spoon sam A Sta.►d�rd penetration tests were conducted in conjunction with
split -spoon sampling in accordance with ASTM D 1586-84. Representative portions of
split -spoon samples were returned to our laboratory for visual classification and testing.
Test Boring Records indicating specific subsurface information from each boring are included in
Appendix IL Stratification lines shown on Test Boring Records are intended to present
approximate depths of changes in soil types_ Naturally, transitional changes in soil type are often
2

f�
gradual and cannot be defined at a particular depth.
Each piezometer consists of a 5 foot long, 1 inch diameter PVC screen section with 0.01 inch
slots followed by 1 inch diameter solid PVC pipe to the ground surface. Clean sand was placed
along the screen sections to approximately 1 foot above the top screen. Within the 10 foot
piezometer, hydrated bentonite was placed above the sand to the ground surface. Within the 20
foot piezometers, about 2 feet of hydrated bentonite was placed above the sand followed by soil
auger cuttings to the ground surface. Piezometer installation records are included in Appendix IL
3.0 LABORATORY TESTING
Laboratory testing consisting of natural moisture content and grain size analyses was performed
on representative samples for general classification purposes. All testing was conducted in
general accordance with applicable ASTM standards. Test results are included in Appendix III.
4.0 SM CONDITIONS
In general, downstream slopes and crests of the dikes are grass covered and appear to be routinely
mowed. No surface sloughing, cracks, deep erosion gullies or other signs of distress were
observed. Based on measured elevations and distances, the downstream slope of the east dike of
the northern lagoon (in the vicinity of the soil test borings) ranges from about 3.5(I):1(V) to
4.3(H):1(V). Cross sections of the dike at the boring locations are shown in Figure 3 in Appendix
I.
The areas north, east and south of the lagoons consist of both grass covered areas and cultivated
agricultural fields. An existing drainage ditch is located about 80 feet east of the lagoon dikes and
is oriented in a north -south direction. The ditch is approximately 5 feet wide and 3 to 4 feet deep.
A }
Approximately 2 to 6 inches o;watejr ova observed within the ditch.
3

At the time of our drilling operations, ponded surfiaceolout 2 to 4 inches deep) covering
an area of approximately 20 feet by 30 feet was present near the downstream toe of the east dike
of the northern lagoon. Water samples previously collected by the Division of Water Quality
were taken from this area Tall "lush" grass extends 5ato 100 feet (north, east and south) beyond
the observed ponded water. Based on conversations with representatives of ADJ Farms, we
understand that very wet conditions are present in the areas of "lush" grass during wetter periods
of the year. The ground surface throughout the remaining areas surrounding the dikes was
relatively dry with no signs of prior ponded water.
5.0 SUBSURFACE CONDMONS
Based on results of the borings, the dike materials can be described as loose to medium dense.
clayey and silty sands (SC, SK which extend to depths of about 8 to 10 feet. Relatively clean
loose to medium dense sands (SP) were encountered below the dike fill materials. Stiff silty clay.
(CL) was encountered within the last 6 inches (29.5 to 30 feet) in boring B-1. Standard
penetration test values ranged from 10 to 37 blows per foot within the embankment material and
from 10 to 36 blows per foot within the foundation soils.
Water depths were measured in piezometers and hand auger borings at least 24 hours after
completion. Both of the 10 foot piezometers were dry. Water depths ranging from 12.3 to 12.5
feet (approximate Elevations 34.6 to 35.0) were recorded in the 20 foot piezometers. Water
depths of 4 feet were recorded in both hand auger borings which correspond to approximate
Elevations 34.5 feet and 32.8 feet for hand auger borings HA-1 and HA-2, respectively. In
general, recorded water levels appear to be at or a few feet below original ground surface.
Although water levels may fluctuate with seasonal changes in rainfall and evaporation rates, water
levels directly below the dike are also influenced by the water level within the lagoons. A rise in
water levels beneath the dikes is expected if water levels in the lagoons increase.
4

6.0 RESULTS OF ANALYSES
10 Yl-
6.1 Seepage
Hand drawn flow net procedures were used to attempt to' model possible seepage conditions and
to estimate pore water pressures in the dike section and foundation soils. The flow net was
adjusted to correspond to water levels measured in piezometers and hand auger borings. Based
on the flow net and recorded water levels, it appears that seepage is primarily downward and
laterally through the foundation soils. Also, piezometric water levels indicate that hydraulic head
loss occurs rapidly, such that flow below the dike is not confined by the embankment soils. The
phreatic surface (top line of seepage) appears to emerge at the ground surface in depressed areas
beyond the dike toe. Due to high early head loss, water levels downstream of the dikes may be
only slightly higher than original groundwater levels in the area.
Based on the flow net and assumed "uniform" hydraulic conductivity of the foundation soils,
calculated infiltration into the existing ditch is about 2,900 cubic feet per day for a 150 foot long
section. However, based on field observations and conversations with representatives of AD7
Farms, we expect that actual seepage rates are much less than calculated, at least during drier
periods of the year. Further evaluation, including monitoring of flow rates within the ditch., field
hydraulic conductivity tests, and monitoring of ponded surface water would be required in order
to more accurately estimate seepage quantities. IfC) b I ''on�� �1��t� = 1f �C4
6.2 Slope Stability
Analysis was conducted to evaluate stability of the downstream slope of the dike in the vicinity of
boring B-1 where wet conditions were observed downstream. The phreatic surface estimated by
the flow net and measured water levels was used in the analysis. Soil strength parameters were
estimated based on empirical correlations with standard penetration test N-values and soil types.
Graphical, results of the analysis are presented in Figure 6 in Appendix I. As indicated, the
minimum calculated lac4 of safety against slope instability is about 2.8. The most critical failure
5

0.
surface indicated by the lowest factor of safety is a shallow slcwghm&`( failure. Typically,
IF
calculated factors of safety of 1.5 or greater are considered to for retention pond dikes.
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOM31ENDATIONS
Based on results of our stability analyses and field observations, the dike sections appear to be
adequately maintained and in stable condition. No signs of sloughing, excessive erosion, cracks
or other signs of instability were observed. We expect seepage has contributed to wet conditions
downstream of the east dike of the northern lagoon. Although original groundwater levels were
relatively shallow in the area prior to lagoon construction (Elevation 36 feet _as indicated in
"Waste Management System" documents), additional hydraulic head associated with elevated
water levels within the lagoons has likely resulted in increased water levels downstream. :.
It has been our experience that it is often difficult to directly contribute fecal coliform levels to a
single source. However, based on estimated seepage conditions and the close proximity of the
lagoon to the area where water quality samples were obtained, it is likely that fecal coliform
contained within ponded surface water is at least partly the result of seepage. The results of our
analyses and site observations indicate the potential for off -site discharge of fecal coliform laden
surface water can be reduced by installation of a blanket drain collection system. More extensive
drainage to improve dike stability does not appear necessary at this time.
We recommend the blanket drain consist of a 12 inch thick layer of No. 67 stone wrapped in a
nonwoven geotextile filter fabric followed by 12 inches of soil cover. Based on field observations,
we recommend that the blanket drain be about 30 feet wide and 200 feet long. The drain should
be placed adjacent to the toe of the east dike in the area where there is evidence of prior surface
water ponding ("wettest area" on Figure 1). Beyond the blanket drain, fill should be placed as
required to provide positive drainage toward the existing ditch located about 80 feet east of
lagoon dikes.
A 4 inch diameter PVC collector pipe should be installed to provide an outlet for water collected
within the stone. 4The pipe `should discharge to the existing ditch. A detail sketch of the blanket
6

Oro W�O
drain is shown on Figure 4 in the Appendix
VY-
If desired, a 6 inch perforated HDPE pipe surrounded by washed stone (NCDOT No. 67)
wrapped in a geotextile fabric may be installed within the existing ditch.. The gravel zone should
be at least 2 feet wide and 2 feet deep. Soil fill may be placed above the gravel up to the ground
surface. The gravel and pipe would eliminate having an open trench in the vicinity of the lagoons.
Depending on water quality following construction of the seepage collection measures, it may be
necessary to pump water collected within the ditch (or ditch drain) back into the lagoon. As
discussed previously, seepage rates calculated using the flow net model are likely much -higher
than actual conditions. However, it is import= to realize that placement of collected seepage
water into the lagoon will add to temporary storage thereby reducing the "allowable" temporary:.
storage period. Once the seepage collection system is installed and site grades improved, flow.
rates from the ditch (or ditch drain) should be monitored for a brief period to better determine the .
need (if any) for additional temporary storage capacity.
W

COWER CF PAD MARKED
+' RED CRQ33sOA'Q3
E LEV. )
OF SLOPE
NOTE: BASE PLAN OBTA NED FROM ADJ—FARMS
TOPO SURVEY DRAWING DATED 12/17/93.
SCUP: = i oo' BOWING LOCATION N F'a"RE Na
CriECXED Sr FSM BASS LAKE ROAD LAGOON
3-5
DRAYM Br. TRPtsm CUNTON J NORTHFARM CAROUNA
N
JULY 1998 El GINENYENTAL BENVIGES
E1040--98-075
IIGINEERING rEsnNo ,SOB a

GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
n
8-1
8-2
21 10
19 10
' 3T 20
23 10
• 10
22 18
•;.
12
12
LEGEND
SEE ATTACHED LEGEND
(APPENDIX II)
FIGURE NQ
4,ECKIM O'n FW BASS LAKE ROAD LAGOON
DRAW Br. TRPtsm CUNTON J NOR HFARM CAROUNA
one JULY 1998 ENVIRONMENTAL - SERVICES NG 1040-98-075
ENGINEEiAMG TESTING J� NQ

ELEV. (FT.)
50
ELEV. (FT.)
50
DIKE CROSS Si
CREST it 47.34'
APPROXNATE
ORIMAL CROUM SURFACE
CREST . 47.05'
M
SURFACE

DRAINAGE BLANKET DETAIL
(, a 9L HOWWOVEN CEOTI:XTILE FILTER FABRIC
T r.L
LN.CJ).O.T.r#'-67) STONE
30,
2.
j; Jlr
l�
SLOPE TO
TOP OF DITCH
t
1 .
4- SOLD PVG Prz
4" PERFORATED PVC PIPE
31e" PERFORATIONS
3 3 PER FOOT
DRAINAGE BLANKET DETAIL m mm f"o-A'-m RGUME Ho.
deem E
BASS LAKE LAGOON '��'°""
AN 3--5 FARM �� Y1R N1A[ �gpyl 4'
. opl1M BYt .+ ��OIN�£RkNOT� TESTINOCL!
CLINTON, NORTH CAROLINA um AUX&r IM

i
ESTIMATED SEEPAGE FLOW;
'LEV. (FT,)
60
30
t0
Ma . 47N
SWAM •
in N aaa� —f0 aWM MWAC11
NOTE Kr.H EARLY HEAD LOSS REOUIRED
IN ORDER FOR PMREATIC SURFACE
TO CORRESPOND TO PIEZOMETRIC
WATER LEVELS MEASURED IN PIEZOMETERS
aF"
a
��jY,J

75
Y--Ax is
(ft)
50
25
a
Bass Lake Lagoon
Ten Most Critical.` C:4098A.PLT By: FSM 07-14-98 6:01,pm
Soil Strength Parameters
l- Clayey to Silty Sand Fill: y = 120 (pco, C' = 0, 0' = 33°
2- Medium Dense Sand: y = 120 (pcQ, C' = 0, V = 34 °
3- Medium Dense Sand: y = 115 (pco, C' = 0, 0' = 32 °
;- - - - - - - - - - - - - .----1 i
25 50
75
100
125
PCSTABL5
FS min= Z.773
X-Axis
(ft)
150
FIGURE 6
175

LEMM TO SOIL CLASSIFICATION AND SYNBOLS
SOIL TYPES
(Shown in Graphic Log)
Fill
'
Possible F;[i
■
Topsoil
Gravel
D
Sand
®
Silt
®
Clay
®
Organic
Sandy
®
Silty
®
Clayey
Silty Sand
Clayey Sand
Sandy Silt
®
Clayey Slit
Sandy Clay
®
Silty Clay
® Partially Weathered
Rock
® Cored Rock
YIATFR l FVFI S
(Shown in Water Level Column)
q a water Level At Termination Of Boring
water Level Taken After 24 Hours
Loss Of Drilling Water
-K- hole Cave
STD. PENETRATION
RESISTANCE
BLOWS/FOOT
CONSISTFNCY
Very Soft
0 to 2
Soft
3 to 4
Fiala
5 to a
Stiff
9 to 15
very Stiff
to to 30
Hard
31 to 50
Very Hard
Over 50
RELATTyF ❑E Sy TTY
Very Loose
Loose
Medium Dense
Dense
Very Dense
STD. PENETRATION
RESISTANCE
BLOWS/FOOT
0 to 4
5 to 10
1t to 30
31to50
Oren 50
SAMPLER TYPES
(Shown in Samples Column)
0
Shelby Tube
®
Split Spoon ,
I
Rock Core
❑
No Recovery
Standard - The Number of Blows of 140 lb. Hammer
Penetration Failing 30 in. Required to Drive 1.4 in.
LO. Split Spoon Sampler I Foot.
As Specified in ASTM 0-1586
REC - Total Length of Rock Recovered in the Core Barrel
Divided by the Total Length of the Core Run Times
100%.
R130 - Total Length of Sound Rock Segments Recovered
that are Longer Than or Equal to 4" (mechanical
breaks ezluded) Divided by the Total Length of
the Core Run Times 100X.
* Testing

PROXC : Bass Lake Road Lagoon
A IJ 3-3 Faro TEST BORING RECORD B-1
PROJECTM: 1040-88-075 ELEVAMM 47.3 FEET KQ
LO1WE! 8'h FSM 8ON=CEPTI<t 3aO FEET 1) Boring location Is approximate. 2)
Elevation determined from site benchmark
GAZE oRRIM 06119198 YATER LEVEL; 123 FEET (8123 98; (Elev. 50 Feet). 3) water level recorded In
1311LLW KETHOtk 3114' IYSA Gnu R>$ C)E S5 adlacent plezometer.
Y
Sall Description
s
�'
LU
w
y
Standard Penetration
Test
Data
O
or
r..
w
w
MW3/10
a
m
�
ID
3D
50
709
OW FILU Medlum Dense orange -Brown
Slightly Clayey Fine to Medium SAND
(SC). Moist
21
Is
DIKE FILL: Oense Tan and
Orange -Brown Silty Fine to Medium SANG
S7
(SM). Moist
Medium Dense to Dense Light Gray
1
Medium SMO (SP), wet
23
-
37.3
i
38
2D
27.3
22
25
22.3
12
17.3
12
Stiff orange -Brown Silty CLAY (CL), Wet
Boring Terminated at 30.0. Water level
was measured at 12.3' In P1(20) on
6123198.
f.
Page: 1 of 1
%YQME
Erwrrw�entaf Services
Eni*effft x TestbV

PROJECT: Bass L*8 ROW Lepoorf
AOJ 3-5 Para
PROTECT No.: 1040-98-075 ELEVATDOFI+ 47J FEET
LOGM BY: FSX 130RD18 CEPTH: 20.0 FEET
11A7E WEILLIElk 08122198 VATER LEVEL: 125 FEET
MULLDE KE['HOM 3 114' KS_A_ CFMLL RM CtE 55
_ w
a Im W
o qC
o Sall Descriptiono y
V, J
OIKE FILL: Loose Orange —Brown Slightly
Clayey Fine to Medium SAND (SC). Moist
DIKE FBI: Medium Dense Tan and
Orange —Brown Silty Fine to Medium SANO
(SM), Moist
Loose Black and Dark Gray Silty Medium
t SANO (SM) with Some Organics. Moist
• Loose to Medium Dense Gray Medium
SAND (SP), Wet
• — With Trace of Clay From 12' to fT'
t -
— Strong Amonla Odor In Sample obtained
from 18.5• to 20'
20
Boring Terminated at 20.0. hater level
Was meastred at f2.5' In P2 (207 24 hours
after Termination of Boring.
Page : 1 of 1
TEST BARING RECORD B-2
NOTES:
1) Boring location Is approximate. 2)
Elevation determined from site benchmark
(Elev. 50 Feet). 3) Water level recorded In
adjacent plezometer.
Standard Penetration Test Oat
Ui a
w {81o++sllt) TLM-L
37
21
t7
to
to
20
10
to
18
Environmental Services
E Qlnea h * resth q

Results of Hand Auger Borings
Bass Lake Road Lagoon
ADJ 3-5 Farm
Location
Depth (ft)
Description
HA-1
(6/19/98)
0-2.5
Orange brown silty sand (SM), moist
2.5-5
Gray silty sand with root hairs (SM), moist
5-6
Gray medium sand (SP), wet
Boring terminated at 6 feet
Groundwater recorded at 4 feet on 6123198
HA-2
(6/19/98)
0-2.5
Orange brown silty sand (SM), moist
2.5-3.5
Black organic stained silty sand with some wood
fragments (SM), moist
3.5-4
Light gray medium sand (SP), wet
4-5
Light gray clayey sand (SC), wet
Boring terminated at 5 feet
Groundwater recorded at 4 feet on 6/23/98
M

+e
PVC
END CAP ?
go= suwmz
1" SCH 40 PVC
WELL CASING
BOREHOLE1.0
BENTONITE SEAL FROM
0 FT. TO 4 FT.
a
LJ
a�
Jz-
a
cn�o
in
> t[3
W
Z
W
TOTAL DEPTH 10 FT.
PVC CAP
PIEZOMETER WELL
DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
SCAM AS
sm
WELL CONSTRUCTION
P 1, P2 (101)
"1Q
CHECKM By: FM
DRAM Er: mp
WE: ALY 149E
Jog NO. 1040--BS-4375

PVC
END CAP
a
DEF9
Wo o suffuz
1 " SCH 40 PVCI
III III
I I I
WELL CASING
III
•.
Ell
BOREHOLE
III III
N `
�r:
JF
11 lEE III
II 11EII
III lEE
II II
Q
III TTT Ilf
BENTONITE SEAL FROM
12 FT. TO 14 FT.
o
nod
o
QN
:.
OWN
-1 Z
im
_
DLJ LO
Ld
TOTAL DEPTH 20 FT.
v,n
�y r
PVC CAP
PIEZOMETER WELL
DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
SM&E. AS SHOO
sm
WELL CONSTRUCTION
P1,P2 (20`)
nmm
NL
FW
DRAWN BY: TRP
me
DATE: JULY 1
aMo • r[illseo
JOB No. 1OW-M--075

< 4.75 mm and >2.00 mm Silt < 0.075 and > 0.005 mm
< 2.00 mm and > 0.425 mm Clay > 0.005 mm

V m
Coarse Sand < 4.75 mm and >2.00 mm Silt c 0.075 and > 0.005 mm
Medium Sand a 2.00 mm and > 0.425 mm Clay > 0.005 mm

Fine Sand < 0.425 mm and > 0.075 mm
Silt < 0.075 and > 0.005 mm
Clay I > 0.005 mm
lil
=Dr

Coarse Sand < 4.75 mm and >2.00 mm
Medium Sand < 2.00 mm and > 0.425 mm
;;1;
Fine Sand
< 0.425
mm and
> 0.075 mm
Sift
< 0.075
I
and >
0.005 mm
Clay
> 0.005
mm

lei

June 10, 1998 RECEIVED
ADJ Farms J UN 1 1 1998
1366 Bass Lake Road FAY T j -VILi E
Roseboro, NC 28382 REG. OFFICE
North Carolina Department of Environment
And Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Attn: Jeffery Brown
225 Green Street
Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Dear Mr. Brown:
In response to your letter noting deficiencies during your previous
inspection, we would like to respond to your request of actions to be taken.
1: Temporary action has already been addressed by placing a dirt wall
around the seepage area. This will maintain any seepage within its
boundaries and not allow any seepage to enter the ditch area. S&ME
(Geotechnical/Environmental Services Division) has been contracted to
evaluate the stability anc: seepage conditions at the ADJ 3-5 location. A
copy of this contract will be mailed with this letter for your records. After a
site investigation on June 5, the contract was signed and they proposed to
start work within 10 working days on performing embankment test by
drilling appropriate soil test borings. This test will enable us to determine
the stability of the embankment and address any seepage at the toe of the
lagoon. We (ADJ Farms) feel that we have taken the best possible route in
correcting any possible problems, as well as any future problems that may
arise if appropriate measures are not taken. We will continue to monitor
the temporary measures taken uniii S&ME can provide us with
recommendations of rep-3irs. I will be in close contact with you throughout
the process.
2: Measures have been taken to establish crops in the back spray field.
The waste utilization plan has been revised. Millet is planted in the
lower portion of the field allowing coverage until August — September at
which time fescue will be planted as a permanent measure for waste
application. Coastal is being resprigged at this time. This matter has
been addressed as promptly as possible.

We feel that every possible effort is being made to resolve any deficiencies on
our farm. I fill that I have covered all requested terms of action. If you have any
questions please call me at [phone] ext. 254 or mobile [phone].
We will be in contact with you pad your office on all procedures taking place.
,?Kou,
rren
Secretary, Treasurer

Y.
r
t
i-
June 5, 1998
Mr. Jeff Warren
AI?J Farms, Inc.
1366 Bass Lake Road
.Roseboro, NC 28382
Reference: GeotechnicallEnvironmental Services
Bass Lake Road Hog Lagoon at ADJ 3-5 Farm
Roseboro, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1040-98-075
Dear Jeff:
Based on your. verbal authorization, S&ME is proceeding to evaluate stability and seepage
conditions at the A.INJ 3-5 hog waste lagoon in Roseboro, NC. We will evaluate the stability of
the embankment by drilling an appropriate number of soil test borings and completing an
engineering analysis. If the stability analysis indicates an inadequate safety factor, we will
provide recommendations for repairs to the embankment. Based on the soil borings and a visual
inspection, we will provide recommendations and sketches for the installation of a toe drain to
capture and pump the seepage back into 'the lagoon. Our proposed scope should enable us to
address both the stability of the embankment and seepage at the toe of the embankment. .
Our services will be billed based on the actual quantity of work completed and the attached Fee
Schedule. Based on the scope outlined above, we estimate that our cost will be in the range of
$5,000 to $7,000. This estimate does'not include analytical testing of the seepage water since we
understand that this data has already been obtained. We suggest a not -to -exceed budget of
$7,000 and we agree not to exceed this figure without your prior written authorization. We are
proceeding based on your verbal authorization, but require written approval by signing the
SBME, Inc.. 3100 Spring Forest road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27616. [phone], Fax [phone]
Moiling address: P.O. Dox 58069, Ra eigh. North Corolino 27658-8069

ADJ 3-5, Bass lake Rd. Hog Lagoon S&ME Project No. 1040-98-075
Roseboro. North Carolina June 5, 1998
attached Agreement for Services (Form AS-931) and returning them to our office. We will then
execute both copies and return one to you for your files.
We appreciate the opportunity to assist you and please give us a call if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
S&ME, Inc.
/OnaldT. Carter, P.E.
Vice President
Walter J. 13eckwith, P.G.
Senior Registered Professional
Attachment

S&ME, INC
1998 Schedule of Fees
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1.
Principal (Level VI and above), per hour.......................................................................
$
125.00
2.
Senior Consultant/Project Director (Level V), per hour .................................................
$
110.00
3.
Senior Professional -Project Manager, Registered Engineer or
Hydrogeologist, or Scientist (Level IV), per hour.........................................................$
97.00
4,
Project Professional -Engineer, Hydrogeologist, or Scientist
(Level I11), per.hour........................................................................................................$
85.00
5.
Staff II Professional -Engineer, Hydrogeologist or Scientist
(Level II), per hour.........................................................................................................
$
67.00
6.
Staff I Professional-tngineer, Hydrogeologist or Scientist
(Level I), per hour................................:.........................................................................
$
60.00
7_
Senior Environmental Technician, per hour..................................................................
$
55.00
8_
Environmental Technician or Technical Assistant, per hour .........................................
$
48.00
9.
CAD Operator, per hour................................................................................ ... ..
$
45.00
10.
Secretarial Services, per hour.........................................................................................
$
35.00
11.
Travel by Vehicle, per mile:.......................................................................I..................
$
0.35
12.
Travel Expenses................................................................................................. ............
$
Cost
13.
Supplies and Materials...................................................................................................
$
Cost
14.
.Report and Document Copies ........................................................................................
$
Supplies
pp
+ $0.15/page
15.
Mail and Special Handling of Reports...........................................................................
$
Cost
16.
Subcontract and Specialty Services...............:...............................................................
$ .
Cost
17.
IBM 586 or Equivalent, per hour, Cad & Modeling......................................................
$
I0.00

S&ME, LYC
1998 Schedule of Fees
DRILLING AND FIELD TESTING SERVICES
1. Mobilization and Transportation of Drill Rig and Crew, lump sum, Local ..............................$
a. Out -of town (beyond 50 mile radius) add to local mob, plus per mile both ways ...............$
2. Soil Test Borings: -(ASTM D-1586 -Includes Split Spoon Samples
on 5-foot Intervals
0 - 50 feet:
a. Less than 60 blows per linear foot........................................................................................$
- For depths greater than 50 feet, add $1.00 per foot and add $2.00 per sample
for each 25-foot increment of depth.
b. Greater than 60 blows per linear foot................................................................................... $
300.00.
1.50
8.50
11.50
- For depths greater than 50 feet, add $1.00 per foot and add $2.00 per sample
for each 25-foot increment of depth.
c. Additional Split Spoon Samples:
0-50 feet, each sample............................................................................................................$ 15.00
- For depths larger than 4" diameter add $1.00 per inch of additional diameter
3. Hourly rates for Drill Rig and Crew
a. Truck Mounted (Auger or Rotary), per hour........................................................................$
b. All Terrain Mounted (Auger or Rotary)............................................................................... $
4. Dutch Cone penetrometer Borings, per linear meter.................................................................$
5. Auger Borings, per linear foot....................................................................................................$
6. Wash Borings, (4" diameter), per linear foot............................................................................$
* For borings larger than 4" diameter, add $1.00 per inch
of additional diameter per foot
7. Subsistence per Two Man Drill Crew, per day..........
110.00
120.00
18.00
7.00
5.75
.................................................... $ 110.00

S&ME, I7VC
1998 Schedule of Fees
DRILLING AND FIELD TESTING SERVICES (Continued)
8. Undisturbed Samples:
a. Standard 3" Shelby Tube Samples, each ................................................. .........$
....................
b. Piston 3" Shelby Tube Samples, each..................................................................................$
9. Bag Samples, each .................. ............................................................................... ..................... $
10. Difficult Moving (in Excess of 1/2 hour per Boring), Clearing Access
Standby Time, Laying Water Line, Hauling Water or Drilling on Time, per hr. .................... $
11. Grouting of Boreholes ano Piezometers, per hour.....................................................................$
12. Rock Coring:
a. Setup, per hole...................................................................................................................... $
b. Installation Casing, per foot..................................................................................................$
c. Reaming Casing, per foot .................................................... ............ ....................................... $
d. NQ or NX Coring (Including Diamond Bits and Core Boxes)
1) Rock, per foot....................................................................................................................$
Note: For hard broken formations, chert, quartz, recrystallized
sandstone and limestone, add bit cost to hard rock rate.
13. Water Truck (when used by crew), per day...............................................................................$
14. Casing Advancer. .
a. NW Casing Advancer, per foot..............................................................................................$
15. Rental of Steam Genny, per day.................................................................................................$
17. Dozer rental for clearing access to boring locations and
moving drill rig in difficult access areas:
85.00
90.00
35.00
100.00
110.00
125.00
4.50
8.00
36.00
125.00
20.00
80.00
a. S&ME's Dozer, per hour .... ................................................................................................... $ 55.00
b. Subcontractor Dozer............................................................................................................. Cost + 15%
18. Supplies for installation and grouting wells and Piezometers ................................................... Cost+ 15%

S&ME,17VC.
1998 Schedule of Fees
LABORATORY TESTING
1.
Grain Size Test (Wash 200 Sieve), ASTM-D-1140, each.........................................................$
45.00
2.
Grain Size Test (with Hydrometer), ASTM-D-422, each .........................................................
$ 65.00
3.
Natural Moisture Content Test, ASTM-D-2216, each .............................................. ................
$ 6.50
4.
Organic Contents, ASTM-D-2974, each....................................................................................$
37.50
5.
Atterberg Limits Test, ASTM-D-4318, each.............................................................................$
45.00
6.
Unit Weight and Moisture Determination Test, each................................................................$
28.00
7.
Consolidation Test on Undisturbed Samples, ASTM-D-2435, each ................... I ................ ....$
225.00
on Remolded Samples, each............................................................................................ ....$ 270.00
8. Standard Proctor Compaction Test, ASTM-D-698, each..........................................................$ 95.00
9. Soil Specific Gravity, ASTM-D-954, each............................................................ .................... $ 37.50
10. Modified Proctor Compaction Test, ASTM-13-1557, each .......................................................$ 105:00
11. Stone Proctor Compaction Test, each ..................... .. $ 110.00
..................................................................
12. California Bearing Ratio Test, ASTM-D-1883 per point
a. Unsoaked............................................................................................................................... $ 42.00
b. Soaked....................................................................................................................................$ 46.00
13. Unconfined Compression Shear Test, ASTM-D-2166, each
...................... $ 80.00
14. Triaxial Shear Test - (each Test Includes 3 specimens and 3 MoVs Circles):
Corps of Engineers - EM 1116-2-1906, Appendix X
a. Unconsolidated, Undrained and Undisturbed Samples, each ..............................................$ $260.00
On Remolded Samples, each.............................................................................:...................$ 300.00
b. Consolidated, Undrained, with Back Pressure Saturation
with or without Pore Pressured readings, each......................................................................$ 350.00
OnRemolded samples, each..................................................................................................
c. Consolidated, Undrained, or Undisturbed Samples, each ....................................................$ 380.00
On Remolded Sample, each........................:...................................................................I......$ 400.00

S&ME, EVC
1998 Schedule of Fees
LABORATORY TESTING (Continued)
15. Permeability Test, Constant or Falling Head
Corps of Engineers - EM 1116-2-1906 Appendix VH
a_ Undisturbed Sample, each.....................................................................................................$ 160.00
b. Remolded Sample, each........................................................................................................$ 185.00

Agreement for Services
Form AS-931
Date: June 4, 1998
Job Number.
S&ME, Inc.
Client Name: ADI Farms, Inc.
(hereafter Consul anQ
(hereafter Client)
Address: 3118 Spring Forest Rd.
Address: 1366 Bass Lake Road
City Raleigh
City; Roseboro
State: NC Zip;
27616
State: NC Zip: 28382
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone:
Fa�c [phone]
Fax:
` PROJECT
Project Name: Geotechnical/Environmental Services
Project location: (Street Address:)
Bass Lake Road Hog Lagoon at ADJ 3-5 Farm
City Roseboro
State NC Zip
SERVICES TO BE RENDERED
Proposal Number:
dated: June 4, 1998 is incorporated into this Agreement For Services.
This Agreement for Services is incorporated into the above Proposal.
WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Client desires to contract with Consultant
to furnish Services to Client's project identified above.
WHEREAS, Consultant is engaged in the business of providing
services and related labor, materials, and equipment (herein individually and
collectively referred to as Services.)
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the Mutual Covenants and
Promises included herein, Client and Consultant agree as follows:
OFFER ACCEPTANCE: Client hereby accepts Consultant's offer to
provide services as described in Consultant's proposal for services referenced
under "Services to be Rendered" and agrees that such services and any
additional services authorized by client shall be governed by this Agreement
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. "Contract Documents" shall mean this
document as well as the proposal listed under"Services to be Rendered" each of
which is incorporated into the other.
PAYMENT - Client will pay Consultant for services and expenses in
accordance with the Contract Document& tf prices for services are not established
under SERVICES TO BE RENDERED than the current fee schedule in effect for the
location providing the services shall be used as the amount to be paid by client for
services provided_ Consultant will submit progress invoicesio Client monthly and a
final invoice upon completion of its Services. Each invoice. on presentation, is due
and payable by Client Invoices are past due 30 days after the date of the invoice.
Past due amounts are subject to a late payment fee otone and one-half percent per
month (18 percent perannurn) orthe highest amount allowed by applicable law on
the outstanding balance whichever is less. Attorney's fees and other costs
incurred in collecting past due amounts shall be paid by Client
Consultant shall be paid in full for aft services rendered under this
Agreement, including any additional services authorized by Client in excess of
those stated in this Agreement
The Clients obligation to pay under this Agreement is in no way
dependent upon the Client's abilityto obtain financing, payment from third parties,
approval of governmental or regulatory agencies, or upon the Client's successful
completion of the Project
WARRANTY AND STANDARD OF CARE - Consultant and its agents,
employees and subcontractors shall endeavor to perform Services for Client
using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by an d consistent with the
standards of others ordinarily providing similar services in the same or similar
locality as the one where the services are performed. In the event any portion of
the Services fails to substantially comply with this warranty and standard of care
obligation and Consultant is promptly notified in writing prior to one year after
completion of such portion of the Services, Consultant will re -perform such
portion of the Services, or if re -performance is impractical, Consuhantwill refund
the amount of compensation paid to Consultant for such portion of the Services.
THE REMEDIES SET FORTH HEREIN ARE EXCLUSIVE.
This WARRANTY AND STANDARD OF CARE is in lieu of all other
warranties and standards of care. No other warranty or standard of care,
expressed or implied, including warranties of merchantability and fitness for a
particular purpose is made or intended by the proposal, by oral communications
or by any representations made regarding the services included in this
Agreement
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY - Consultant and Client mutually agree
that the services provided pursuant to this Agreement involve risks of liability
which cannot be adequately compensated for by the payments Client will make
under this Agreement Therefore, the total cumulative liability of Consultant its
agents, employees and subcontractors whether in,contract tort including
negligence (whether sole or concurrent) and strict liability, or otherwise arising
out of, connected with or resulting from the services provided pursuant to this
Agreement shall not exceed the total fees paid by Client or fifty thousand dollars,
whichever is greater. At additional cost Client may obtain a higher limit of liability
prior to commencement of services. The additional cost is compensation to
Consultant for increasing the Consultant's limit of liability. The additional cost is
not an insurance cost Consultant's consideration to Client for this limit of liability
is specifically reflected in Consultant's fees for services under this Agreement as
such fees are less than Consultant would be paid for services under an
Agreement without a limitation of liability. Cli d Is cautioned that llhis Is a limited
Gabiliry Agreemerrt Limiting the lfabli ty of Corhsultard; therefore, Chord Is advised
to carefully review Client's risks of Babif!!y related to tMs fact and address
such risks through CDort's Insurance or other memm
DISCLAIMER OF CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES - In no event shall
Consultant or Client be liable to the other for any special. Indirect, incidental or
consequential loss or damages, including lost profits and loss of use.
REPORTS - In connection with the performance of the Services.
Consultant shall deliver to Client one or more reports or other written documents
reflecting Services provided and the results of such Services. All reports and
written documents delivered to Client are instruments reflecting the services

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL. OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
January.15, 1999
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jim Leumas
Dam Safety Engineer
Land Quality - Raleigh Central Office
FROM: Jeffery Brown, Environmental Engineer
Fayetteville Regional Office
SUBJECT: ADJ Farm Site 3-5 Swine Lagoon
This memo is in regards to the ADJ Farm Site 3-5 Lagoon that Paul Rawls and
myself spoke with you about on January 14, 1999- Please find the Geotechnical
Evaluation Report completed by S&Its along with this memo. It would be nice
if our office could get your comments within 30 days in order to move forward in
correcting this problem.
If you have any questions or require any further or additional information, please
contact Paul Rawls or myself. Thank you for your cooperation regarding this
matter.
Enclosure
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OP►ORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLEOl1 O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

GEOTECBMCAL EVALUATION REPORT
Bass Lake Road Rog Lagoon
At
ADJ 3-5 Farm
Clinton, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. I040-98-075
t

EbErating:25ywrs of EXceClence
September 4, 1998
Coharie Farms
300 WestoverRoad
Clinton, North Carolina 28328
Attention: Mr. JeffWamen
Reference: Report of Geotechnical Evaluation
Bass bake Road Hog Lagoon at ADJ 3-5 Farm
Clinton, North Carolina
S&ME Pmject No. 1040-98-075
11117_ aI
As requested, S&ME, Inc. has completed the geotechnical evaluation of the hog waste lagoon dikes at
the ADJ 3-5 FawL The purpose of our study was to evaluate wet surface conditions with respect to
seepage and dike stability and to provide recommendations for additional drainage or dike stabilization
measures that may be needed. This report presents the results of our field work, laboratory tests and
engineering analysis along with our conclusions and recommendations.
S&ME, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have any
questions regarding this report or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact us at [phone].
Sincerely,
S&ME,1NC.
F. Sean McGrath P.E.
Geotechnical Engineer
N.C. Registration No.
Z -
1" an Mark PhD., P.E.
Chief Geotechnical Consultant
N.C. Registration No. 9631
SWE, Inc. 3109 Spring Forest Rood, Raleigh, North Corolino 27616. [phone]. Fox [phone]
Moiling address: P.O. Box 58069, Roteigh, North Carolina 27658-8069

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT INFORMATIONw.....NN.N.N....... N......wN....... NN.N..w..........................».w».. 1
2.0 FIELD EXPi.ORATION...Nw..Nb.»N.».N..N.».MNN.Ngw»w.......N.. N....»wN....... N.N.N».M»..2
3.0 LABORATORY TESTING ..............»..... »......»..N...............»N.....:............. w....--3
4.0 SITE CONDITIONS...N..w.w.........»N....N..N».Nw.».N.......»..N..»N.........................w........3
5.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS...N................ w........... ......N..................................
w...N...4
6.0 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS...N.....N..N..w»...N...NN..............N.NN........gN.................. ..5
6.1 SEEPAGE........................................................................................................................5
6.2 SLOPE STABUM............................................................................................................5
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................... .... N»..».»6
APPENDICES
I Flom
II Test Boring and Piezometer Records
III Laboratory Test Rewh
4 --

1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
Project information was provided by Mr. Jeff Warren of ADJ Farms. This information included
design plan and cross section drawings as well as "Waste Management System" design
documentation prepared by USDA Soil Conservation Service (currently NRCS). The lagoons are
located on the east side of existing hog houses and range in size from about 39,300 square feet
! Y (southern lagoon) to about 70,600 square feet (northern lagoon). We understand the northern
lagoon was constructed in 1992 and the southern lagoon was constructed in 1994. Both
impoundments were created by a combination of excavation and construction of earthen perimeter
dikes. The dikes range in height from about 5 to 12 feet above the original ground surface and
were designed with 3R:1(V) slopes. We understand an effort was made during construction to
_ place at least a 12 inch thick layer of clayey sand along the upstream slopes to reduce seepage.
Information contained in the "Waste Management System" documents indicate the dikes are
classified as low hazard dams.
It is our understanding that during a routine annual inspection, representatives of the Water
Quality Section of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r_ (NCDENR), Fayetteville Division, obtained samples of ponded surface water near the
l downstream dike toe at the southeast corner of the northern lagoon. Water samples were
subsequently tested for fecal coliform. Test results indicated fecal coliform levels ranging from 90
co11100 ml to 6,150 col/100 ml. Based on the results, the Division of Water Quality requested
r that ADJ farms further evaluate seepage conditions in the vicinity of the northern lagoon and
l — potential impacts of seepage on dike stability. They also recommended that ADJ Farms
implement appropriate methods to prevent off -site discharge of water containing high fecal
coliform levels.
According to Mr. Jeff Warren of ADJ Farms, wet ground surface conditions existed on the east
side of the northern lagoon prior to lagoon construction. Information contained within the
"Waste Management System" documents indicates a seasonal high water table elevation of about
36 feet within the lagoon perimeter which would place groundwater levels at or near the existing
ground surface during wetter periods of the year.
L`_'- f
1

1_3
2.0 FIELD EI117LORATION
A site reconnaissance was performed by Mr. Sean McGrath, P.E. of S&ME, Inc. to evaluate
general surface features in the vicinity of the lagoons. During the reconnaissance, locations for
soil borings and piezometers were selected. Once established, locations of borings, piezometers
and nearby surface features were determined by representatives of S&ME, Inc. by measuring
distances and estimating right angles from existing site features. Ground surface elevations in the
vicinity of borings (including dike slopes) were determined using surveying methods. All
elevations were based on an existing site benchmark which ADJ Farms has assumed to be
elevation 50 feet. Locations of borings, piezometers and nearby site features are shown on Figure
1 in Appendix I. Horizontal distances should be considered approximate.
To evaluate the general consistency of embankment and foundation soils, two soil test borings
were advanced to depths ranging from 20 to 30 feet along the crest of the east dike of the
northern lagoon. At each boring location, piezometers were installed to depths of 10 and 20 feet
to evaluate phreatic conditions. The 20 foot piezometer at the location of boring B-1 was
installed in a separate borehole (i.e., not within the 30 foot soil test boring). In addition to soil
test borings and piezometers, two hand auger borings were advanced near the toe of the dike
slope to observe general soil types and water levels.
The soil test borings and piezometer holes were advanced using hollow stem auger drilling
procedures with a CME 55 truck mounted drill. Within soil test borings, samples of subsurface
soils were taken at 2-112 foot intervals above a depth of 10 feet and at 5 foot intervals below 10
feet using a split -spoon sampler. Standard penetration tests were conducted in conjunction with
split -spoon sampling in general accordance with ASTM D 1586-84. Representative portions of
split -spoon samples were returned to our laboratory for visual classification and testing.
Test Boring Records indicating specific subsurface information from each boring are included in
Appendix IL Stratification lines shown on Test Boring Records are intended to present
approximate depths of changes in soil types. Naturally, transitional changes in soil type are often
2

gradual and cannot be defined at a particular depth. .
Each piezometer consists of a 5 foot long, 1 inch diameter PVC screen section with 0.01 inch
slots followed by 1 inch diameter solid PVC pipe to the ground surface. Clean sand was placed
along the screen sections to approximately 1 foot above the top screen. within the 10 foot
piezometer, hydrated bentonite was placed above the sand to the ground surface. Within the 20
foot piezometers, about 2 feet of hydrated bentonite was placed above the sand followed by soil
auger cuttings to the ground surface. Piezometer installation records are included in Appendix II.
3.0 LABORATORY TESTING
Laboratory testing consisting of natural moisture content and grain size analyses was performed
on representative samples for general classification purposes. All testing was conducted in
general accordance with applicable ASTM standards. Test results are included in Appendix M.
4.0 SITE CONDITIONS
In general, downstream slopes and crests of the dikes are grass covered and appear to be routinely
mowed. No surface sloughing, cracks, deep erosion gullies or other signs of distress were
observed_ Based on measured elevations and distances, the downstream slope of the east dike of
the northern lagoon (ithe vicinity of the soil test borings) ranges from about 3.5(H):i(V) to
i 4.3(H): 1 (V).. Cross sections of the dike at the boring locations are shown in Figure 3 in Appendix
I.
The areas north, east and south of the lagoons consist of both grass covered areas and cultivated
agricultural fields. An existing drainage ditch is located about 80 feet east of the lagoon dikes and
is oriented in a north -south direction. The ditch is approximately 5 feet wide and 3 to 4 feet d
FF Y gyp•
Approximately 2 to 6 itches of water was observed within the ditch.
p
L
3
r - 1

At the time of our drilling operations, ponded surface water (about 2 to 4 inches deep) covering
an area of approximately 20 feet by 30 feet was present near the downstream toe of the east dike
of the northern lagoon. Water samples previously collected by the Division of Water Quality
were taken from this area. TO "lush" grass extends 50 to 100 feet (north, east and south) beyond
the observed ponded water. Based on conversations with representatives of AM Farms, we
understand that very wet conditions are present in the areas of "lush" grass during wetter periods
of the year. The ground surface throughout the remaining areas surrounding the dikes was
relatively dry with no signs of prior ponded water.
�j 5.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Based on results of the borings, the dike materials can be described as loose to medium dense
clayey and silty sands (SC, SNI) which extend to depths of about 8 to 10 feet. Relatively clean
loose to medium dense sands (SP) were encountered below the dike fill materials. Stiff silty clay
(CL) was encountered within the last 6 inches (29.5 to 30 feet) in boring B-1. Standard
penetration test values ranged from 10 to 37 blows per foot within the embankment material and
from 10 to 36 blows per foot within the foundation sons.
Water depths were measured in piezometers and hand auger borings at least 24 hours after
completion. Both of the 10 foot piezometers were dry. Water depths ranging from 12.3 to 12.5
feet (approximate Elevations 34.6 to 35.0) were recorded in the 20 foot piezometers. Water
depths of 4 feet were recorded in both hand auger borings which correspond to approximate
Elevations 34.5 feet and 32.8 feet for hand auger borings HA-1 and HA-2, respectively. in
general, recorded water levels appear to be at or a few feet below original ground surface.
Although water levels may fluctuate with seasonal changes in rainfall and evaporation rates, water
levels directly below the dike are also influenced by the water level within the lagoons. A rise in
water levels beneath the dikes is expected if water levels in the lagoons increase.
4

i
6.0 , RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
6.1. Seepage
Hand drawn flow net procedures were used to attempt to model possible seepage conditions and
to estimate pore water pressures in the dike section and foundation soils. The flow net was
adjusted to correspond to water levels measured in piezometers and hand auger borings. Based
on the flow net and recorded water levels, it appears that seepage is primarily downward and
laterally through the foundation soils. .Also, piezometric water levels indicate that hydraulic head
loss occurs rapidly, such that flow below the dike is not confined by the embankment soils. The
phreatic surface (top line of seepage) appears to emerge at the ground surface in depressed areas
,beyond the dike toe. Due to high early head loss, water levels downstream of the dikes may be
only slightly higher than original groundwater levels in the area
Based on the flow net and assumed "uniform" hydraulic conductivity of the foundation soils,
calculated infiltration into the existing ditch is about 2,900 cubic feet per day for a 150 foot long
section. However, based on field observations and conversations with representatives of ADJ
Farms, we expect that actual seepage rates are much less than calculated, at least during drier
periods of the year. Further evaluation, including monitoring of flow rates within the ditch, field
hydraulic conductivity tests, and monitoring of ponded surface water would be required in order
to more accurately estimate seepage quantities.
6.2 Slope StabRity
Analysis was conducted to evaluate stability of the downstream slope of the dike in the vicinity of
boring B-1 where wet conditions were observed downstream. The phreatic surface estimated by
the flow net and measured water levels was used in the analysis. Soil strength parameters were
estimated based on empirical correlations with standard penetration test N-values and soil types.
71 I
Graphical results of the analysis are presented in Figure 6 in Appendix 1, As indicated, the
. minimum calculated factor of safety against slope instability is about 2.8. The most critical failure
5

surface indicated by the lowest factor of safety is a shallow sloughing type failure. Typically,
calculated factors of safety of 1.5 or greater are considered acceptable for retention pond dikes.
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on results of our stability analyses and field observations, the dike sections appear to be
adequately maintained and in stable condition. No signs of sloughing, excessive erosion, cracks
or other signs of instability were observed. We expect seepage has contributed to wet conditions
downstream of the east dike of the northern lagoon.. Although original groundwater levels were
relatively shallow in the area prior to lagoon construction (Elevation 36 feet as indicated in
"Waste Management System" documents), additional hydraulic head associated with elevated
water levels within the lagoons has likely resulted in increased water levels downstream.
It has been our experience that it is often difficult to directly contribute fecal coliform levels to a
single source. However, based on estimated seepage conditions and the close proximity of the
lagoon to the area where water quality samples were obtained, it is likely that fecal coliform
contained within ponded surface water is at least partly the result of seepage. The results of our
analyses and site observations indicate the potential for off -site discharge of fecal coliform laden
surface water can be reduced by installation of a blanket drain collection system. More extensive
drainage to improve dike stability does not appear necessary at this time.
We recommend the blanket drain consist of a 24 inch thick layer of clean sand having less than 5
percent fines. Based on field observations, we recommend that the blanket drain be about 30 feet
wide and 200 feet long. The drain should be placed adjacent to the toe of the east dike in the area
where there is evidence of prior surface water ponding ("wettest area" on Figure 1). Beyond the
blanket drain, fill should be placed as required to provide positive drainage to promote rainfall
runoff away from the dikes.
Perforated HDPE collector pipes wrapped in filter fabric should be installed within the sand
blanket. The pipes should be spaced no further than 25 feet apart and should be oriented
perpendicular to the dike alignment. The collector pipes should be connected to a header pipe
6

I MCEMML�
it
which should discharge into a sump pit. Water from the sump pit should be pumped back into the
lagoon. A detail sketch of the blanket drain is shown on Figure 4 in the Appendix.
As discussed previously, seepage rates'calculated using the flow net model are iikely much higher
than actual conditions. However, it is important to realize that placement of collected seepage
water into the lagoon will add to temporary storage thereby reducing the "allowable" temporary
storage period. Once the seepage collection system is installed and site grades improved,
pumping rates form the sump pit should be monitored for a brief period to better determine the
need (if any) for additional temporary storage capacity.
We request the opportunity to review and re-evaluate our drainage collection recommendations if
alternatives are to be considered.
7

APPENDIX
c
r

CMWR OF PAD K6jW p
WrrH RED CROW +�033UMb ELEV. FLAGS
OF BLOM
NOTE: BASE PLAN OBTAINED FROM ADJ—FARMS
TOPO SURVEY DRAWING DATED 12/17 93.
SCALE 1' = too' BORING LOCATION PLAN RGURE NQ
C.,ECKMFSM
„� BASS LAKE ROAD LAGOON
DRAM Sr. TRP CUNTON ADJ 3-5 FARM NORTH CAROUNA
DAM JULY 1998 ENVIRONMENTAL SS 1040-98-075
ENGINEERING • TESTING TING .III Na

0
Q
J
W
GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
B-2
10
r7
20
23 .
• 10
30 .;
., t0
22 1a
12
12
LEGEND
SEE ATTACHED LEGEND
(APPENDIX II)
SCAM 14 1+ - 5. FIGI NC
CHECK ffr. FW BASS LAKE ROAD LAGOON
ADJ 3-5 FARM 2
MA%W BYM-E: TRP CLINTON NORTH CAROUNA
DATE: JULY 19911 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1040-98-075
El�1C.LNEERINEERING -TESTING JOH NQ

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ELEV. (FT.)
ELEV. (FT.)
30
DIKE CROSS SE
CREST . 47.34' 94
-.000-T
APPROXWIATE
ORIGWAL GROUND SURFACE
CREST . 47.05'
GROUND SURFACE

SECTIONS
wN
WL-2
PON=
WATER
Do= mxr&-Tw)
DIKE CROSS SECTIONS
BASS LAKE ROAD LAGOON
ADJ 3-5 FARM
CLINTON. NORTH CAROLINA
*SME
WROMMENTAL WEIMM
OINEERINO 1tp
SCA L 1' 20' APPROVED M FSIM
DATE: AUGUST 1998 DRAWN By.
JOB N04 1040-9$-075 FIGURE 3

' � t
DRAINAGE BLANKS DETAIL
CLEAN SAND (< 5% FINES)
DRAINAGE BLANKET
DIKE SLOPE 6" PERFORATED HDPE "COLLECTOR" PIPE
2' RAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC
ACED EVERY 25 FT. HORIZONTALLY)
30'
6" PERFORATED HDPE "HEADER" PIPE
RAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC
DISCHARGE INTO COLLECTION SUMP)
DRAINAGE BLANKET DETAIL J0B"m 1000-m-073 1101"I "a
BASS LAKE LAGOON 'H AS S?V'"` . •=
ADJ 3-5 FARM mum �
CLINTON. NORTH CAROLINA DAM AMX6r,
��oiN°e�i�ea rcer Ni a°�

ELEV. (FT,)
ao
EVE
FE
WEST r 4 ,T
WA71M SWA(Z . 44It ---w
WnAL ► AD LOSS
NOTE: fQGH EARLY HEAD LOSS REWRED
[N ORDER FOR PHREATIC SURFACE
TO CORRESPOND TO PIEZOM£TRIC
WATER LEVELS MEASURED IN PIEZOMETERS
ESTIMATED SEE
GhM. MUM SWAM
�.. _�, _�. ." • - ��-� � "' �-� , �;.,=�,- ._ _ . z,.......�.:.�-��:.�.�...�:,�� ems. ��._

;E FLOW NET
q:111
ESTIMATED SEEPAGE FLOW NET
BASS LAKE ROAD LAGOON
ADJ 3-5 FARM
CLINTON, NORTH CAROLINA
Enc-KEEPUpdo L IEI o
rria��u�o • No
SGLL 1' 20' APPRMW BY. FSM
OAi AUGUST 1998 DRAWN BY*
J06 H0. 10W-98-075 FK;URf S

125
WA
75
Y-Axi
(ft)
50
25
r
Bass Lake Lagoon
Ten Most Critical. C:4090A.PLT By: FSM 07-14-98 6:01 pm
# IFS2 2.78
3 2.85 Soil Strength Parameters
4 2.86
5 2.87 1- Clayey to Silty Sand Fill: y = 120 (pct , C' = 0, �' = 330
.791
2- Medium Dense Sand: y = 120 (pcf), C' = 0, ¢' = 340
8 2.97 3- Medium Dense Sand: y =115 (pco, C' = 0, �' = 320
9 2.97
10 2.97
s
0
s
3 46
=2.y f+----------------r.-1
ur/'���Illlyi la��
-------------�- ......................... ,.,....... ,��=.----------i
25 50 75 100 125 150 175
PCSTABL5 FS min= 2.773 X-Axis (f t)
FIGURE 6

I LEGEND TO SOIL CLASSIFICATION AND SYMBOLS I
SOIL TYPES
. CONSISTENCY OF COHESIME ROLS
(Shown in Graphic Log) STD. PENETRATION
Fill RESISTANCE
Possible FBI CflRL0Wr,/F00T
T3STSTF_t3CY
® Topsoil Very Soft 0 to 2
Soft 3 to 4
Gravel St5 to B
Stiff f f;t to 15
t Very Stiff to to 30
Sand Hard 31 to 50
Very Hard Over 50
11D Silt
a ® Clay STi7. PENETRATION
� RESISTANCE
OrganicRELATIME DENSITY SOOT
® Very Loose 0 to 4
Loose 5 to 10
Sandy Medium Cense 11 to 30
U • •j Dense 31 to 50
® Silty Very Demo Over 60
® Clayey SAMPLER TYPES
(Shawn in Samples Column)
Silty Sand
_ Shelby Tube
Clayey Sand ® Spot Spoon
VA
x � Sandy Silt
I Rock Core
❑ No Recovery
® Clayey Silt
Sandy Clay TES
s
.a3
Silty Clay Stertdard - The Number of Blows of 140 lb. Hammer
.- PerretratMn Failing 30 in. Required to Drive L4 in.
Partially Weathered J.D. Split Spoon Sampler I Foot.
Y As Specified in ASTM 0-1580
Rock
s REC - Total Length of Rock Recovered in the Core Barrel
w Divided by the Total Length of the Care Run Times
Cored Rock 100Z.
RM - Total Length of Sound Rock Segments Recovered
that are Longer Than or Equal to 4" (mechanical
breaks exluded) Divided by the Total Length of
WADER LEVELS the Core Run Times 100%.
(Shown in Water Levei Column)
a Water Level At Termination Of Boring
j - water Level Taken After 24 Hours
- Loss Of Drilling Water
,_ - Hole Cave _
S&ME
1! logo' so T—�a
A- Engineering * Testing

PROJECT:
Bass Lake Aond Lagoon
AOJ 3--3 Para
PROJECT K&
1040-88-075 ELEVATW*
47.3 FEET
LOGGED Bit
FSM
BORNS OErF t
3R0 FEET
GATE GRO.LEO: 00/19/98
WATER LEVEL 1Z 3 FEET (6123198
ORiLUNG HIETHOO: 3 1/4- KS.A. mu RIG:
CAE 65
U
.. o
Soil Description
o CL7 e d
Cr
c�
-r C
DIKE FILL: Medlum Dense Orange -Brown
Slightly Clayey Fine to Medium SAND
(SC), Moist
DIKE FILL: Dense Tan and
Orange -Brown Silty Fine to Medium SAND
(SM). Moist
Medium Dense to Dense Light Gray
Medium SAND (SP). Wet
Stiff Orange --Brown Silty Cl Ay (CL). Wet
Boring Terminated at 30.0: Water level
Was measured at 12.3' In P1(20) on
6123198.
TEST BORING RECORD B-1
1) Boring location Is approximate. 2)
Elevation determined from site benchmark
1 (Elev. 60 Feet). 3) water level recorded In
adjacent plezometer.
Standard Penetration Test Data ,�
w (Blows/it) m
21
IS
37
23
�iANNIIIII®
i�
In �=0021111M
page: Iof1
r�
Envkonmentat Services
Engineerh q * Testing

PROJECT:
Bass Lake Road Lagoon
AW 3-5 Farm
TEST BORING RECORD B-2
PRG.IECT M0. :
1040-98-075 ELEVAMM
47J FEET
NOTES:
LOG® BY:
FSM BOMNG 0EPT1t
200 FEET
1) Boring tocatlon Is approximate. 2)
Elevation determined from site benchmark
DAIS DAB 08122188 HATER LEVEL.,
125 FEET
(Elev. 50 Feet). 3) Water level recorded In
DRILLING NMOM 3 1/4' H SA. WMI G=
CNE S3
adjacent plezometer.
ca
,�
Sop Description
_
y e w
w Standard Penetration Test Date
a
�-
w (Blows/it) m
10 30 50 T08
DIKE FILL: Loose Orange -Brown Slightly
..
Clayey Fine to Medium SAND (SQ. Moist
to
,(• 4L I to
DIKE FILL: Medium Dense Tan and
Orange -Brown Silty Fine to Medium SAND 20
(SM). Moist
Loose Black and Dark Gray Silty Medium
SAND (SM) with Some Organics, Moist 10
37.11
Loose to Medium Dense Gray Medium
SAND (SIP). Wet
- With Trace of Clay From t2' to fr' to
- Strong Amonia Odor in Sample obtained
from 18.5 to 20' i8
71.
Boring Terminated at 20.0. dater level
Was measured at l2.5' In P2 (207 24 hours
after Termination of Boring.
17
pve : 1 of I
Environmental Services
Engheerinp w Testh+Q

Results of Hand Auger Borings
Bass Lake Road Lagoon
ADJ 3-5 Farm
Location
Depth (ft)
Description
HA-1
(6/19/98)
0-2.5
Orange brown silty sand (SM), moist
2.5-5
Gray silty sand with root hairs (SM), moist
5-6
Gray medium sand (SP), wet
Boring terminated at 6 feet
Groundwater recorded at 4 feet on 6/23/98
HA-2
(6/19/98)
0-2.5
Orange brown silty sand (SM), moist
2.5-3.5
Black organic stained silty sand with some wood
fragments (SM), moist
3.5-4
Light gray medium sand (SP), wet
4-5
Light gray clayey sand (SC), wet
Boring terminated at 5 feet
Groundwater recorded at 4 feet on 6/23/98

1"SCH4
WELL CAS
BOREHOLE
CAP
JITE SEAL FROM
7.TO4FT.
m
Li
O O
�Z,
En w
w 0
U ~
a in
2 in
_ DEPTH 10 FT.
PIEZOMETER WELL DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
CE l An Flm
CNOIA� l JIB
SCALE, AS SHOM FMWM" WELL CONSTRUCTION No.
DRAM �: w Pl,P2 (ID-) .�
DATE Jay ins EMYI4CN�e[NiAL sgllVlCp
Joe NO. 1040-0-075�MEEWNO - TE11:110

1 " SCH 4
WELL CAS
BOREHOLE
s
o4axm
FSM
*wm By
7AthkXP
--
JULY 1996
JOB NO.
ago-�a-W3
lkvlom;Qlpjwl
,L DEPTH 20 FT.
PIEZOMETER WELL DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
WELL CONSTRUCTION
P1,P2 (20')
DrM AM MW
A
: N
Oq—
'j` O
J F-
OE
in
O
OOErELi
O
0 Er
Z IN
in�O
oEnE
�8LO-
RCURE
No.
Z

< 75 mm and > 4.75 mm Fine Sand
< 4.75 mm and >2.00 mm Sift

< 75 mm and > 4.75 mm Fine Sand < 0.425 mm and > 0.075 mm
< 4.75 mm and >2.00 mm Silt < 0.075 and > 0.005 mm

Fine Sand < 0.425 mm and > 0.075 mm
Silt < 0.075 and > 0.005 mm

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION NC #11
817 CASTLE RAYNE STREET NC #37714
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28303 USDA #3787
[phone] / (910) 864-B774 (FAX)
AIR • FUEL WATER FOOD WASTES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CLIENT: NC DEHNR
ADDRESS: Wachavia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
CONTACT,PERSON: Mr'. Jeffery Brawn
ACCOUNT NUMBER: #KN003
SAMPLE ID: 1. Base of lagoon dam - ID #98WE52509
2.
3.
4.
CERT 022713
DATE REC'D: 05/18/98 SAMPLED: 05/18/98
SAMPLED BY: J. Brawn
DELIVERED BY: J. Brown
SAMPLE CODE: WW; Grab.
REFERENCE: Adj. Sites 3-5
DATA REVIEWED BY:�—A_ _
DATE REPORTED: 05/26/98
ANALYSIS. 2 3 4
COLIFORM,'FECAL (per 100 ml) SM18 9222D 26000
COMMENTS: < = Less than
> = Greater than
PAGE 1 OF 1
REL";EIVED
MAY 2 8 1998
FAYETTEVILLE
REG. OFFICE
The date and other Information mrtalned on flea, and other accompanying doo umerts. represent ordy the sample(s) analyzed and is MEMBER
rendered upon the condition that it Is not to be reproduced wholly or in pert for advertising or other purposes without written approval
from the laboratory.
USDA-EPA-MOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Mimobiological Analyses and Research

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION NC #11
817 CASTLE HAYNE STREET NC #37'714
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28303 USDA #3767
[phone] ! (910) 864--8774 (FAX)
i
AIR • FUEL WATER FOODL • WASTES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CERT #22713
CL.TEsNT: NC DEHNR DATE RFC'D: 05/18/96 SAMPLED: 05/18/98
ADDRESS: Wachovia Building, Suite 714 SAMPLED BY: J. Brown
Fayetteville, NC 28301 DELIVERED BY: J. Brown
CONTACT PERSON: Mr. Jeffery Brown SAMPLE CODE: WW; Grab.
ACCOUNT NUMBER:, #MO03 F REFERENCE: Adj : Sites 3-5'y
SAMPLE ID: 1. Base of lagoon dace - ID #98WE52509
h
3.
4.
DATA REVIEWER BY: �— '-'
DATE REPORTED: 05/26/913
"N.
kk4+++i-+k kk+k-k+ 4r+*4- *+++++k{rIS. k"14.'k+++4+}+*t++v}} -It +•Nkk+++k+++}k,P+,t-k kk,l ,y}#yYi+kk++}l-4k,+#k##
ANALYSIS METHOD 1 2 3 4
��#+++#+++}+#++##+##;+#+####+#+tit+#####k++tit#k+##+++k#++++#++++++#+++++•kid+#i+#++#iir++++4
M
COLIFORM, FECAL (per 100 nil) SM18 9222D 26000
COMMENTS: C = Less than
> = Greater than
_ = f.
RECEIVPCD
-
MAY 2 8 1998
FAYETTE .LL
REG. OFF
PAGE 1 OF 1
_ ra.
The data and other information contained on this, and other accompanying documents, represent onlythe sample(s) anatyzed and is M E M B E R
rendered upon the oonddon that It is not to be reproduced wholly or in part for advertising or other purposes without written approval
from the laboratory.
USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Co nsurdng Chemical and Mlcrobio"ica! Analyses and Research

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION NC #11
817 CASTLE RAYNE STREET NC #37714
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28303 USDA #3787
[phone] / [phone] (FAX)
AIR • FUEL WATER • FOOD • WASTES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CLIENT: NC DERNR
ADDRESS: Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
CONTACT PERSON: Mr. Jeffery Brown
ACCOUNT NUMBER: #KN003
SAMPLE ID: 1. Lagoon - ID #98WU52614
2. Discharge - ID #98WD52615
3.
4.
CERT #22778
DATE REC'D: 05/26/98 SAMPLED: 05/26/96
SAMPLED BY: J. Brawn
DELIVERED BY: J. Brawn
SAMPLE CODE: WW, Stream; Grab
REFERENCE: ADJ. Farms
DATA REVIEWED BY:
DATE REPORTED: 05 27/98
++++++++-***+*+**+**+**++++++++++*******++++++i+++++******++++++*++*+*+*++++++++++****++*+
ANALYSIS RHOD i 2 3 4
COLIFORM, FECAL (per 100 ml) SM18 9222D 60000 4400
COMMENTS: < = Less than
> = Greater than
-CNED
DREG r
PAGE 2 OF 2
nN data and other inlomradon contained on this, and other accompanying documerrts, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is MEMBER
rendered upon the condition that it is not to be reproduced wholly or In part for advertising or other purposes without written approval
tram the laboratory.
USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION NC #11
(317 CASTLE RAYNE STREET NC 037714
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28303 USDA 93787
[phone] / -1910) 66-4-8774 (FAX)
AIR * FUEL WATER + FOOD • WASTES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CLT PSNT : NC DEHNR
ADDRESS: Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 26301
C014TAi.T PERSON: Mr. Jeffery- Brotrm
ACCOUNT NUMBER: #KN003 ,
SAMPLE ID: 1. Lagoon - ID #98WU52614
2. Discharge,- ID #98WD52615
3.
4.
CERT 422778
DATE REC'D: 05/26/98 SAMPLED: 05/26/98
SAMPLED BY: J. .Brown.
DELIVERED BY: J..Brown
SAMPLE .ODE: WW, Stream: Grab
REFERENCE. ADJ.' Farrits
DATA. REVIEWED BY:
DATE REPORTED: 05 27,/98
i+++k++##++4,+:++ k 4, i+++++++'k 4,4r+4, J,+44+i++i r+i 3r k-k+t+i1,+i'+L 4++'y+#ri+++i+++++++k+4+4,+
ANALYSIS METHOD 1 2 3 4
'LIFORM, FECAL (per 100 ml) SM18 9222D 60000 4400
COMMENTS. C = Less than
> - Greater than
RECENAt
Milt' 2'8 1998
r
S �
PFIzE 2 OF 2 �.
The data and other Information contained on this, and other aaompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) ansryzetl and Ir
rendered upon the condition that it is not to be reproduced whofly or In part for advertising or other purposes without written approval
from the laboratory.
9
M E M B E R
USDA-EPA-NICSH Testing Food Sanitation Consuft Chernical and Microbiological Analyses and Research

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION NC #11
817 CASTLE HAYNE STREET NC #37714
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28303 USDA #3787
[phone] / [phone] (FAX)
AIR • FUEL WATER • FOOD • WASTES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CERT #22777
CLIENT: NC DEHNR DATE REC'D: 05/26/98 SAMPLED: 05/26/90
ADDRESS: Wachovia Building, Suite 714 SAMPLED BY: J. Brawn
Fayetteville, NC 28301 .DELIVERED BY: J. Brown
CONTACT PERSON: Mr. Jeffery Brawn SAMPLE CODE: WW, Stream; Grab
ACCOUNT NUMBER: #KN003 REFERENCE: ADJ. Farms'
SAMPLE ID: 1. Upstream -- ID #98WU52610
2: Downstream - ID #98WD52611
3. Base of lagoon dam - ID #98WE52612
4. Base of lagoon dam -above sample #65 - ID #98WB52613
DATA REVIEWED BY:
DATE REPORTED: 05/ 7/98
ARNLYSIS b0THOD 1 2 3 4
COLIFORM, FECAL (per 100 m1) SM18 9222D 149 460 290 8182
COMMENTS: < = Less than
> = Greater than
RcCE
&M Y 2 8 1995
FA'� Mjj
�ir-r,�.►L'.
PAGE 1 OF 2
.1
The data and other IMcmistion oornalned on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sampie(s) analyzed and Is M E M 8 E R
rendered upon the condition that it is not to be reproduced wholly or in pan for advertising or other purposes without written approval
from the laboratory-
USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Saniffition Consutting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Researoh

i T
Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION 'NC #, _
81': CASTLE W_rNE STREET NC 031.314
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28303 USDA #3787
[phone] /'[phone] (FAX)
AIR • FUEL WATER • FOOD WASTES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CERT #22777
CLYRNT: NC DERNR DATE REC'D: 05/26/98 SAMPLRi: 05/26/98
ADDRESS: Wachovia Building, Suite 714 SAMPLED BY: J. Brown
Fayetteville, NC 28301 DELIVERED BY: J.-Brown
CONTACT PERSON: Mr, Jeffery Brown, � SAMPLE CODE: WW, Stream; Grab
ACCOUNT 14UMBER: ##itiNO03 � REFERENCE: A�7�. Fbrnts '
SAMPLE ID: 1. Upstream - ID #98WU52610
2. Downstream - ID #98WD52611
3. Base of lagoon dam - ID #98WE52612
4. Base of lagoon dam above's,ample 465 - ID ##98WE52613
LIATA REVIEWED BY:
DATE REPORTED: 05/ 7/�981-4
*+*+4+*4,*44, 444, 4+i##*4-4-+4,+44+4 k*-}ii+ }}ii 1{4i+ll+4, i, +*}w{}++f 4, 4, k}i 4, k 4 k.. l}.4 # 444
ANALYSIS METHOD 1 2 3 4
#+**+*#+#+*+#+#*i}*++}i+*}}.}*•4**ti++#*}iiir}}#}ii*i}}**ki•#**+i**}.k}}}+
COLIFORM, FECAL (per 100 ml) SM18 9222D 149 460 290 8182
Y Zr
COMMENTS: < = Less than
> - Greater than
r / 1
RECERVE
MAY 2 8 1998
FAYETTEVILLE
REG. GFFicE
--PAGE 1 OF 2
�a
The data and other irdormedon rornalned on tills, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is M E M B E tR
rendered upon the condition that it is not to be reproduced wholly or in part for adv rftng or other purposes without written approval
from the ieboratory.
USDA-EPA-NEOSH Testing Food Sanlffition Consulting Charnk;al and Mieftiologicai Anatyses and Research

NCDENR w_-.
4 ti'i � �i aiyCi'S' -• St'•FSMY� ��i
JAMES B. BUNT JR..;x -':
-".WAYNE MCDEvrrr ,--k: ter
r4 SECRCTAAY �q. ,
1'; F li f,y9Me { i
4- a
" NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
� ";
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
1
Division of Water Quality
June 5, 1998 `
i
MEMORANDUM
TO: Sue Homewood, Environmental Engineer
Permits and Engineering
FROM: Jeffery Brown, Environmental Engineer
Fayetteville Regional Office
SUBJECT: Permit Issuance
ADJ Hog Farm 3-5
Facility No. 82 - 72
The ADJ Farm swine facility in Sampson County owned by Ronald and Wayne
Cannady along with Jeff Warren is subject to be permitted- A current inspection
has determined that one of the lagoons on the farm seems to have a seepage
problem. It is the request of the Fayetteville Regional Office that the issuance of
this permit be delayed until the problem on the farm can be corrected. Once'the
problem has been corrected our office will notify you so that the permit can be
issued.
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 29301-8043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/i 0% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

? awA
NCDENR:
J^mEs B. HUNT J
NORTH CAROL[ NA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
_ 11• l
Division of Water Quality
June 5, 1998
MEMORANDUM C
TO: Sue Homewood, Environmental Engineer
Permits and Engineering ti
FROM: Jeffery Brown, Environmental Engineer
Fayetteville Regional Office
SUBJECT: Permit issuance
ADJ Hog Farm 3-5
Facility No. 82 - 72
The ADJ Farm swine facility in Sampson County owned by Ronald and Wayne
Cannady along with Jeff Warren is subject to be permitted. A current inspection
has determined that one of the lagoons on the farm seems to have a seepage
problem. It is the request of the Fayetteville Regional Office that the issuance of
this permit be delayed until the problem on the farm can be corrected. Once the
problem has been corrected our office will notify you so that the permit can be
issued.
223 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX QI O-486.0707
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Division of E gientaj,Man�agement
RECEIVED GROUI II R SECTION �
2D,
For Investig:410I N.o
r. r- n01
Samples collected
Lab Only Quad
Lab No. No.
N
L
Time
'No. of
C6ntainers
l
shed by[Sign r ):.' -
R in ui4—
R ived b
attar
a / 'me
Rei.
Rec. by
/
Rel.
Rec. by
/
Rel.
Rec. by
/
Method of Shipment:
Seal by:
Security Type and Condition: Lock by:
Broken by: yuyltt
Open by:
I Ail IMP nn11 v
Lab No.
From
Relinquished by
Rec ived by
Of a e T me,
Note: Uriginai sent with shipment 2% GW-63 Copy retained by collector 286

or
DIVISION Oh WATER QUALITY
saWry Laboratory Report 1 Ground 1Yxler Qualily
COUNTY: SAM1111SONa y SAMPLE PRIORITY
QUAD NO: I of ROUTINE EMERGENCY
REPORTTO�—FRO Regional Office 7 CrIAINOFCUSTODY
COLLECTORS) : F'1111.L11'SIBARNHARDT
DATE: 1I/219a WF SAMPLCTYPE
TIME:
PURPOSE
J {;
�. LA'10RATORY ANALYSIS
11
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Califoon: h1F Fecal 31616 /IOOml
Colifarm: MFTotat31SO4 /IOOml
TOC mg/l
Turbi6ty NTU
Residua, Suspended 530 mg/L
Total Suspended solids mg/L
pit units
Alkalinity to pH 4 5 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 5.3 mg/L
Carbonau mg/l,
Eimbonale mg1L
Carbon dioxide mg/L
Chloride In L
Chromium- Hex 1032 uglL
Color- True 80 c.u.
Cyanide 720 mglL
COMMENTS:
Owner:
Location or Site:
Descriplion of sampling point
Sampling Method:
Remarks
ADJ FARMS
Diss. Solids 70300
mg/L
Fluoride 951
mglL
Hardness. total 90o
mg/L
Hudmv (non-=b) 902
mg/L
Phenols 32730
ug/L
Specific Cond. 95
umhos/cm2
Sulfate
mg/L
Sulfide 745
mg/L
M BAS
mg/L
Oil and Grem
mg/t,
Silica
mg/L
Boron
Formaldehyde
mg/L
X
NH3 as N 610
0.08
mg/L
X
TKN as N 625
0.2
mglL
X
NO2 +NO3 as n 630
2.1
mg/L
X
P:1 olnl as P 665
0.01
mg/L.
I'04
mg/L
Ag-Silver 46566 ug/L
AI -Aluminum 46557 ug/L
As -Arsenic 46551 ug/L
Bn-Buiurn 46559 ug1L
Ca -Calcium 46552 mg/L
Cd-Cadiurn 46559 ug/L
Cr-Chrominm 46560 ugll,
Cu- Copper 1042 ug/L
Pe -Iron 1045 ug/L
HS- Mercury 719M ug/L
K-Potassium 46555 rn&1L
Mg- Magnesium 927 mg/L
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/L
Na- Sodium 929 mg1L
Ni-Nickel ug/L
Pb-Lead 46564 ug/L
Se -Selenium ug/L
Zn_Zinc 46567 ttg/L
Lab Number
8G2437
Date Received
i IR419g
Time Received
9;00
Received By
DS
Released 13y
DS
Date reported :
II11g/98
Organachlorina Pesticides
Rz-'
anaphosphurrus Pesticides
Ren PesItcides
Acid Heibicides
` '�C 3 4 1998
F '.YETTEVILLE
} ,"'. OFFICE
602437 Nov

GROUNDWATER FI
y
Qua NSerial No.
Lal. Long.
DILL-IB FORM
r
North Carolina
t Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - GROUNDWATER SECTION
PLE-TYPE SAMPLE PRIORITY Lab Number r
Water ❑ Routine
❑ soil Date Receiv d .Time
❑ Emergency
❑ Other Rec'd by: From. Bus, a Hand Del.,
J Other:
Repot To' ARO(, FRO, MRO, RRO,. WaRO, WiRO, Chain of Custody Data Entry By: Ck:
WSRO, Kinston FO, Fed. Trust, Central Off., Other: Date Reported:
Shipped by: Bus,(Cdurte , Hand Del., Other-
-. �A-' 1207 nkjy. dt Purpose:
Collet or(s):, ''2 I I s A Dale f I z3 Time �•� Baseline, Complaint, Compliance LUST, Pesticide Study, Federal Trust, Other:EL LD A%N&LYSES Owner r► s �w�«�1
p 400 Spec. Cond.84 at 25° C Location or site --n.rM.S i z� ' r( "
Temp. °C Odor 01M Description of sampling point --
to�. ._
ppearance Sampling Method �._ a Sample Interval
field Analysis By: Remarks -- _ �V�p[Z f p- �`
U�1
DIES. Solids.7�(Q _ mall--
An - Silver 46566 uNl
Organochlorine Pesticides
Flouride 951 m 11
Al - Aluminum 46557 u It
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Hardness: a !l
As - Arsenic 46551 u !I
Nilro en Pesticides
Hardness non-carb 902 M9111
Ba - Barium 46556 u A
Acid Herbicides
Phenols 7 A
Ca - Calcium 46552 m I
PCB's
Cd - Cadmium 46559 u A
_
Sulfate 945 trigA
Cr - Chromium 46560 uqA_
Sulfide 745 mgA
Cu - Copper 46562 u 11
Fe - Iron 46563 u A
Semivolatile Organics
011 and Grease m 11
H - Mercury 71900 u A
TPH - Diesel Range
K - Potassium 46555 m 11
M - Magnesium 46554 m tl
Mn - Manganese 46565 WA
NH as N 610 m /1
Na - Sodium 46556 m A
Volatile Organics (VOA boitle)
TPH. - Gasoline Flange
NO + NO as N 63o m
Pb - Lead 46564 u
TPH - BTEX Gasoline Range
P: Total as P 665 mqll
Se - Selenium u
Zn - Zinc 46567 u
pa
Lab Comments: f
.t
rC
GVY-54 REV. 7M For Dissolved Analysis - submit fillerecl sample and write "DIS" In block �iS-G. E OOFFFFICE