820044_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

Z IV
NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

of Environment,A14
• .
Hartment
and Natural Resources
•
Division of 8.0 onmenlal Manogwiient
7.
acmes B. Hunt, ir.,'G�lx
WML-
Jcroa tlOn B. Howes. Secretary
FE H F
A. Preston HowcnL jr., P.E. Oweeo►
=
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CERTIFICATION OF ABBROVED
ANMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR
NEW OR EXPANM 'AN7XAL WAS= MANAGSIOWP
SYSTEMS SERV=40 FEEDLOTS
In Order to be deemed permitted by the
Division og Environmental Management
(DEH), the owner of any new or expanded animal waste management system
constructed after January 1, 1994 which
is designed to serve greater than or
equal to the animal population* listed
below is required to submit a signed
certification fo= to DE24 bsga= the new Ani—Is are stocked on the farm.
Pasture operations are exestpt from the requirement to be certified.
100 bead of cattle
75 borser - - -
250 sviar
1,000 &beep
30, 000 birds Keith a 14 qu4 A waste systems
The certification must be signed by the owner of the feedlot .-hand-=
diffarant from the owner) and by any technical specialist designated'by_the Soil - -
and Water, Conservation Commission pursuant. to 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. A
technical specialist moat verify by an on -site inspection that all applicable
design and construction standards and specifications are met as installed and
that all applicable operation and maintenance standards and. specifications can
be mat. - -
Although the actual number of an u m is at the facility may vary from time to time,
the design capacity of the waste handling system should be used to determine if
a farm is subject to the certification requirement. For example, if the waste
system for a feedlot is designed to handle 300 hogs but the average population
will be 200 hogs, then the waste management system requires a certification.
This certification is required'by regulations governing -animal waste management
systems adopted by the Environmental Management Commission (EMC) on December 10,
1992 (Title I5A NCAC 2H .0217).
On the reverse side of this page is the certification form which must be
submitted to OEM before new animals are stocked on the far-M. Assistance in
co=pleting the form can be obtained from one of the local agricultural agencies
such as the soil and water conservation district, the USDA -Soil Conservation
Service, cr the N.C. Cooperative Extension Service. The form should be sent to:
Department of Environment, Health and
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section, Planning Branch
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-OS35
Phone: [phone]
Form iD: ACITE'40194
Natural Resources
Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quyf7alif1 Section
Cate:
P.O.3cx 29535. Pdeigh. North Caroir, z 276260535 Telephone [phone]S FAX [phone]
An EGud 00007u idy Atftrmarhm Act= employer 5C% recyc:ad/ 10% post{ Ons,.,rner poOer

Tease x eft� "sr. eft" 2i aw she Divi etea of ftlumg eat at
the addsese as the 3" esre SAAS of 12"A toil.
Hera of fam lease print) s
Address 0
Phone No.
County
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude: jA:"/7$'�"3�"(required) . Also,
Please attach a copy of a county road rasp with location identified.
Type of operation (manias. layer, dairy, etc.) : 5 v..n a . .
Design capacity (number of animals); _ O FIE=0 -FLn.FSf+ -
Average size of operation' (I2 month population avg.) : ff8 E"O - fe4oSH
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres)s 81
sssrsa s s.a..aa..ss.:a.�s.s.sus.ss:..aa:sa.as.....i.s...ssa.ss:sasaa..a...:......sas
Sechaical Specialist Cartitieat3ea
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 1SA NCAC 6F .0005. I certify that the new or
expanded a-i—i waste management system as installed for the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to iSA NCAC 2H.0217 and
1SA NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria-hazra�sen verified by me or other designated tec.'us4 Cal specialists and
are included in the plans as applicable: minimilm separations (buffers) ; liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party) ; access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the central of the discharge
of pollutants from sto�ter runoff 4avents less severe than the 2S-year, 24-hour
storm.
Sege of Technical specialist (Please print): G . G[&nn C'.[.Irm►1
Affiliation•._?_*6MTo4ee FA_ 1_i'► 5 -nc,
Address (Agency) : P.Q. Any _AU ift4ti Wn.�r 2.493AA Phone No.9/Q-5-2-57"11,,,-
Signature: �. _ C�I.lt� _ �T Date: Y3-O 95
assss:ssssssasssssss:ss:s sasssasssssssssasssssasassss:sass:ssssssss:s
Owner/gaga= agreement
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these rrocedures. I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Divisions of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste _ran this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a story event less severe than the 2S-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the fa--m and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
Nimes cf Land owmar. (Please Print) : G CL r`/
Signature:
Date: 4"-- `"5
Name of Manager, if different from owner (Please print)-
5 ignature - Date:
A change in lard ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Ci-rision cf
Enviro=ental Management within 60 days of a title transfer.
ODD USE ONLY:ACTEWN

SNCTION III
Field Site Hanagement
1. Is animal Waste stockpiled or lagoon
construction within 184 ft. of a USGS
Map Blue Line Stream?
2. Is animal waste land applied or spray
irrigated within 25 ft. of a USGS bsap
Blue Lane Stream?
3. Does this facility have adequate acreage
on which to apply the waste?
4. Does the land application'site have a
cover crop in accordance'w►ith the
CERTIFICATION PLAN?
5. Is animal waste discharged into waters of
the state by men -made ditch, flushing system,
or other similar man-made devices?
5. Does the animal waste management at this
farm adhere to Best Management practices
(BMP) of the approved CERTTFICATZON?
7. Does animal waste lagoon have sufficient f
freeboard? How much? (Approximately
6. is the general condition of this CAFO facility,
including management and operation,
satisfactory?
S=ION 1V
Continents

// <17
NORTE CAROLIM DEPARTNM OF MWIROMCMT, ZRALTB b NATORAL RECCES
Fayetteville Regional Office
Animal Operation Compliance Inspection Form
aISPZCT1OW6ATE'"�
GCrrq 3a w C-?a $G qqetf
.y yy.:��.x .s,..•��w ��1yy�.:��.. �}�].���.$�� pp �� M , :a)q`w�v�i
a:�4 T, w�h/airyr�.�.tr'A�.w)�ni�•��p!��i�J�:
V
iLl�iL1TYr'.1
Z 13u1C z r 2
La +D -5(v - 9
All questions answered negatively will be discussed in sufficient detail in
the -Comments Section to enable the deemed Permittee to perform the appropriate
corrections:
SECTION I fin'Ish
Animal O ration
Horses, cattle, wi poultry, or sheep
SECTION II
Y i N I COMMENTS
1. Does the number and type of animal meet or exceed
the (.0217) criteria? [Cattle (100 head),
horses (75), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and
poultry (30,000 birds with liquid waste
system)] _
2. Does this facility meet criteria for
Animal Operation RMI TFtATIO .
3. Are animals confined fed or maintained
in this facility for a 12-month period? -
4. Does this facility have a CERTIFIED Al�IIAL
WASTE MANA%EKENT PI.7�►!I?
5. Does this facility maintain waste management
records (Volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with
specific Cover crop)?
6. Does this facility meet the SCS minimum
setback criteria for neighboring houses,
wells, etc?

Imo)) • �
1 Ji Clurdl
� xee�er Ra
If1�
war Rd � exa yk ZLWee�
?206 ' cE. `b
R�T�v lgbf 4 / Nf61 � In
� 1 Pand
�d19
� 301
lot. �m �!d
278 IB79
lf+ � {
H O �' � ■ °M'PD 2004 �� r
P z� Feed urrl aft
Bwsnn Rd
i MI SCALE I' = 5280' OR I MILE 2 W SAMPSON 04 05 06
SAMPSON COUNTY '7A
,7
5280 2640 0 5280 I0560 Op Ty f� ��
df
.' a � atom
ca
0

Operator:Gary Baggett #1 County: Sampson:
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner):
1. AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT (ALW)
0 sows (farrow to finish)
0 sows (farrow to feeder)
2940 head (finishing only)
0 sows (farrow to wean)
0 head (wean to feeder)
Describe other :
Date: 09/12/94
1
-1240.0 feet
x 1417
lbs.
_ / 0
lbs
x 522
lbs.
= 0
lbs
x 135
lbs.
- 396900
lbs
x 433
lbs.
= 0
lbs
x 30
lbs.
= 0
lbs
0
Total Average Live Weight = 396900 lbs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 396900 lbs. ALW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW = 1 CF/lb. ALW
-Volume = 396900 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION Sludge Accumulation Not Computed At
Owners Request Remove Sludge
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet As Needed
4. TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
Inside top length (feet)---------------------- 210.0
Inside top width (feet)---------------------- 350.0
Top of dike elevation (feet)------------------ 55.0
Bottom of lagoon elevation (feet)------------- 43.0
Freeboard (feet) ----------------------------- 1.0
Side slopes (inside lagoon)-------------------- 3.0 1
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0' 204.0 344.0 11.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH
204.0 344.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
138.0 278.0
70176 (AREA OF TOP)
38364 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
171.0 311.0 212724 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. _ (AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM) * DEPTH/6
70176.0 212724.0 38364.0 1.8
Total Designed Volume Available = 588984 CU. FT.

5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
210.0 350.0 73500.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
0.0 square feet Describe this area.
- TOTAL DA 73500.9--square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Feces & urine production in gal./day per 135 lb. ALW 1.37
Volume = 396900 lbs. ALW/135 lbs. ALW * 1.37 gal/day 180 days
Volume = 725004 gals. or 96925.7 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallons
per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall - 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 42875.0 cubic feet

5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.0 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 42875.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A.
96926
cubic
feet
5B.
.0
cubic
feet
5C.
42875
cubic
feet
5D.
42875
cubic
feet
TOTAL 182676 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
Temporary storage period____________________> 180 days
Rainfall in excess of evaporation====== =====> 7.0 inches
25 year - 24 hour rainfall===== =--==========> 7.0 inches
Freeboard===================================> 1.0 feet
Side slopes===______________________________> 3.0 . I
Inside top length=====______________________> 210.0 feet
Inside top width============================> 350.0 feet
Top of dike elevation=======================> 55.0 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation===--=============> 43.0 feet
Total required volume=======================> 579576 cu. ft.
Actual design volume================ -------- > 588984 cu. ft.
Seasonal high watertable elevation (SHWT)===> 50.3 feet
Stop pumping elev.====________--------------> 51.1 feet
Must be > or = to the SHWT elev.------====> 50.3 feet
Must be > or = to min. req. treatment el.=> 49.0 feet
Required minimum treatment volume==========_> 396900 cu. ft.
Volume at stop pumping elevation============> 399007 cu. ft.
Start pumping elev._________________------_-__> 53.3 feet
Must be at bottom of freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25 yr.- 24 hr. rainfall==> 546109 cu. ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation===========> 540662 cu. ft.''
Required volume to be pumped======== -------- > 139801 cu. ft.
Actual volume planned to be pumped==========> 141655 cut
ft.
Min. thickness of soil liner when required==> 1.8 ,
7. DESIGNED BY: Lanier & Houston CHECKED BY:
DATE: I 1-% I g i DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:

USDA -SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE UNITED STATES
303-D EAST ROWAN STREET DEPARTMENT OF
PHONE [phone] AGRICULTURE
---------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATOR : GARY BAGGETT A/dr c .' -T-V%d LNGOO %S
Please review the attached plan and specifications carefully.
Retain this plan for your use and records. It is strongly
recommended that you, your contractor and the Soil Conservation
Service personnel are in agreement as to how the waste lagoon
is to be constructed. SCS personnel will meet with all
concerned parties and walk over the site to explain all flags
and markings. It is important that everyone understands what is
expected so that final construction meets plans and
specifications and the job can be certified for payment (if ACP
cost -share is involved)-
The pad dimensions and grades are the best estimate. The
builder or contractor is responsible for final layout and
design of the pads. SCS personnel will assist in a limited
capacity, as its major concern is the proper design and
construction of the waste treatment lagoon.
The actual amount of material required for pads and dam may
vary from the estimates. The design will attempt to balance
cuts and fills as close as possible. If additional material is
required after construction is complete on the lagoon, the
contractor and owner will negotiate on the price and location
of the borrow area.
It should be noted that certification of the lagoon will depend
upon all specifications being met. Important •items include
length, width, depth, slopes, topsoil placement, correct
elevations (top, bottom, discharge pipes), and seeding.
ARE CULTURAL RESOURCES EVIDENT? Yes NO X
DESIGN REQUIREMENT: 0 cu.ft = 0 cu.yds.
1,159,152 cu.ft=42,476 cu.yds.
EST. EXCAVATION 1 & 2-------------------
ESTIMATE OF PAD: 574,020 cu.ft=21,260 cu.yds.
------------------
ESTIMATE OF DIKE: 90,828 cu.ft =3,364 cu.yds.
------------------
ESTIMATE OF MATERIAL FOR SANDY -CLAY LINER: = 0 cu.yds
ESTIMATE OF TOPSOIL REQUIRED: = 0 cu.yds.
Ratio 1.7 1
--- Total Excavation=42,476 cu.yds.
Job Class III Designed By: LANIER & HOUSTON 9/12/94
------------------------------
Date
Design ApprovalJ" -1 �1/9_,1
-- - T
Date

PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number. 02- 4 County: Sampson
Facility Name: Baggett & Sons
Certified Operator Name: Gary Baggett Operator Number:
AWAI S344
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name11D:
Spillway(Y or N):
Levet(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
15 14
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWO prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
'Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
'if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3_ Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: as conditions permit
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct
Gary Baggett Phone:
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date:
Facility er an ger (signature)
910-385-5923
9/17/2018

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND10R 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: Lagoon 1
line m =
641.0 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID: Lagoon 2
line m =
799.4 lb PAN
3.
Structure ID.
line m =
lb PAN
4,
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines I+2+3+4+5+6= 1440.4lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(Iblacre)
4 TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (Ibs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
5
Bermuda H
0.40
240.00
96.0
March-SePt
4
Bermuda H
1.40
240.00
336.0
March -Sept
3
Bermuda H
4.70
240.00
1128.0
March -Sept
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 1560.0 lb. PAN
IV. FACILfTY'S POA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 1440.4 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section Ilt) = 1560.0 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -120 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
Remaining PAN is an estimate.
PoA (30 Day) 221/00

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1_ Structure Name/identifier(ID): La oon 1
2_ Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 15.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 20.4 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 5.4 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 73500 ft2
e, line c/12 x line d x 7,48 gallonslft' 247401 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f, temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 95925.7 ft3
h. current herd # 2940 certified herd # 2940
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line t=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 7/10/2018
m. ({lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00
96926 ft'
�ft3
42875 ft3
174285 gallons
1.52 Ibs/1000 gal.
641.0 lbs. PAN

PLAN OF ACTION (PGA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
1. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelldentifier (ID): I Lagoon 2
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 14.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 20.4 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 6.4 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 73500 ft2
e, line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallonslW 293216 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g_ volume of waste produced according to structural design 96925.7 ft3
h. current herd # 2940 certified herd # 2940
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i +j) x 7.48 x 30 daysliine f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 7/10/2018
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 221100
96926 ft'
�W
42875 ft'
174285 gallons
1.71 Ibs/1000 gal.
799A lbs. PAN

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/ldentifier (ID).
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker Dinches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard —]inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) Qftz
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/W gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design Odays
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design Oft3
h. current herd # 0 certified herd #0
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00
tts
ft3
W
gallons
Ibs11000 gal.
0 lbs. PAN

G A 2 C3 A G (rF-T i FA UI) 5 2 -- 0 0'4 q
3 3h 40 Svc
�vo,rrp
y►7
►o ,7
i
S 1
100.21
loo,pq
G
s, a
9.1119
,7-7
`14
S, 75*
qI8. cil
3 3
q9,31
5.
qq, 7z
o
?
S s 1,,2)
d ,71 q ,q
772- 100, oD
FREE 3oR fLb : g_ - 7, 9
a;,q
I oF:
SAGG-eTT PArLM
313 11(0
I
�
r
IT
owl;I
,
VrF
��'
r
S

696 11,2 a4a 1.4 a 't,6tZZA/7-., 11ol Zqrjl 1-1,qE lei fwz :i)IQEj baftaij
Of*
Op
r
Apb
00 00 1 =A8
L
JOA91
4"1
uooft�
L.10015e-) 2,
u
6 V
54, MOW AL
V
iods molt
gods mol t

A�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E.
Governor Director
Mr. Gary Baggett
1145 Feedmill Rd
Roseboro, NC 28382
Gary Baggett & Son
82-44, AWS820044
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Baggett:
August 23, 2012
Dee Freeman
Secretary
This is a copy of form for Backup OIC and two pages of regulation that apply to poultry waste. One of
these pages applies to the hauler, but I thought it would be a good idea for you to be aware of those rules, in
case you deal with a hauler who is not. Haulers are also required to be registered with DWQ. This is on our
computer system but I don't think the list is available to the general public yet. So if you need someone checked
out, call me. A Poultry Waste Plan can be drawn up by the owner of the facility but still has requirements for
agronomic rate, setbacks, soil tests, and record -keeping. If you need to do one, check with Cooperative
Extension. If all the litter is hauled off your farm, you do not need one but the other landowner does. Even in
that case, you still have to keep records of dates, amounts, who picked it up, etc, as stated in these pages.
Good luck on the cleanout.
Sincerely,
Joan Schreier
Environmental Specialist
10-433 3333
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
225 Green St., Ste. 714
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 North Carolina
Internet: www.h20.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer �atura!!r�

Gmy Baggett & Son
08/23/12
Page 2
cc: AP Files, FRO
attachments: OIC form
15A 2T .0100- 1600 pg.73,76

906
APR'Nutrient ent animal Waste Utilization
Yft
This plan has been prepared for:
Gary Baggett & Son Farm
Gary Baggett
1095 Feedmill Road
Roseboro, NC 28382
[phone]
This plan has been developed by:
Melanie Harris
NRCS/Sampson SWCD
84 County Complex Rd.
Clinton, NC 28328
910-592-7963
Develo r Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (o er) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: b
ATechal Specialist Signature Da e
----------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-27-2006 Cover Page 1
RECEIVED I DENR I DWQ
Ag0fK Prntpntinn Serfion
APR 0 3 2009

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 5,450,760 gals/year by a 5,880
animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
12554
Incorporated
21561
Injected
23744
Irrigated
13646
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
13,580
16154
-2,574
6,568,103
-1,117,343
Year 2
13,504
14919
-1,415
6,065,221
-614,461
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
Note: In source 1D, 5 means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-27-2006 Source Page Page 1 of I

Narrative
Added odd corners, etc. that could not be reached with pulls, but could be utilized via honeywagon or
aerway. Buffers were measured using irrigation design. & WA determination map drawn by JPB
approved by William Carl Dunn, PE 4/5/02.
Changed rotation on pulls 13-17 to include corn.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-27-2006 Narrative Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are
also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure_ Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if
the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High_
Planned Crops Summary
P205
Total
Useable
Plat
Remm.11
(lbs/acre)
Applied:
(Ibs/acre)
Tract
Field
Acres
Arm
Rating
Ll
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
10773
13H
1.4
1.40
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Small Grain Ovemeed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
80
N/A
10773
lH
J-00
1.00
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
N/A
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
51
N/A
10773
3H
1.90
1.80
Low
NIA
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
N/A
Cam, Grain
115 bu.
51
N/A
10773
4H
0.91
0.40
Low
NIA
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
80
NIA
10773
5H
1.20
1.20
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
80
N/A
10773
8H
7,80
7.80
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
N/A
Com, Grain
115 bu.
51
N/A
10773
Pi
4.6C
4.6C
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
IS
NIA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
80
NIA
10773
P10
5.30
5.30
Low
NIA
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
NIA
Com, Grain
115 bu.
51
N/A
10773
P11
4.40
4,40
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
NIA
Com, Grain
115 bu.
51
NIA
10773
P12
530
5.30
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
N/A
Com, Grain
115 bu.
51
N/A
W773
P13
2.8
2.80
Low
NIA
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 10/27/2006
PCS Page Page 1 of 3
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Planned Crops Sun nary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
LI
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P205
Removal
(ibslacre)
Applied
(lbslacre)
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
N/A
Corn, Grain
115 bti-I
51
N/A
10773
P14
4.5C
4.50
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
NIA
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
51
NIA
10773
P15
4.50
4.50
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
N/A
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
51
NIA
10773
P16
3.80
3.80
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
NIA
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
51
N/A
10773
P17
1.60
1.60
Low
NIA
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
NIA
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
51
N/A
10773
P2A
0.70
0.70
Low
NIA
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
80
N/A
10773
P2B
1.40
1.40
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
so
NIA
10773
P3
4.70
4.70
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
80
N/A
10773
P4
1.40
1 A0
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
80
N/A
10773
P5
0-4C
0.401
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
80
NIA
10773
P6
1.30
1.30
Low
NIA
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
•35 bu.
28
NIA
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
51
NIA
10773
P7
2,5G
2.50
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
NIA
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
51
NIA
10773
P8
0.9c
0.90
Low
NIA
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
N/A
Corn, Grain
l l5 bu.
51
NIA
10773
P9
2.6
2.60
Low
NIA
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tong
80
N/A
PLAN TOTALS: 66.80 66.80
156741 Database Vetsion 3.1 Date Printed 10/27/2006
PCS Page Page 2 of 3
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
< 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
>= 2 &
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<= 10
"High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples
> 10
are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778),
and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
'APL
ATIfid&
W ..W
me n'—K-K.
adio
9.,
'ed
0-25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
25-50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51-100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
—>] 00
Very High
Starter P application only
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 10/27/2006
PCS Page Page 3 of 3
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper tinting of applications to
maxinuze nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
'tract
Field I
Source
to
Soil Series
Total
Acres I
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Contm,
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrienlA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManurcA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N I
1000
gal/A
Tons I
1000 gals
tons
10773
13H
S7
Norfolk
1.40
1.40
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Broad,
50
21,71
0.00
30.39
0.00
10773
13H
S7
Norfolk
1.40
1.40
Hybrid Bermudagrass flay
6.5 Tans
3/1-9/30
296 1
0
0
Broad. 1
296
128.52
0.00
17992
0100
10773
1 H
S7
Norfolk
1.00
1.00
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Broad.
63
27.14
0.00
27.14
0.00
10773
1H
S7
Norfolk
1.00
1.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Broad.
137
59.48
0.00
59.48
0.00
10773
311
S7
Norfolk
1.80
1.80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Broad.
63
27.14
0.00
48.84
0.00
10173
311
S7
Norfolk
1.80
1.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Broad.
137
59.48
0.00
107.07
0.00
10773
4H
S7
Norfolk
0.90
0.90
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1.3/31
50
0
0
Broad.
SC
21.71
0.00
19.54
0.00
10773
4H
S7
Norfolk
0.90
0.90
Hybrid Bermudagrass flay
6.5 Tons
3/1.9130
296
0
0
Broad.
296
128.52
0.00
115.66
0.00
10773
5H
S7
Norfolk
1.20
1.20
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Broad.
50
21.71
0.00
26.05
0.00
10773
SH
S7
Norfolk
1.20
1.20
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
296
0
0
Broad.
296
128.52
0.00
154.22
0.00
10773
811
S7
Norfolk
7.80
7,80
Wheal, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Broad,
63
27.14
0.00
211.66
0.00
10773
8H
S7
Norfolk
7.80
7.80Soybeans,
Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
D
Broad.
137
59.48
0.00
463.96
0.00
10773
Pl
S7
Norfolk
4.60
4.60
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
91,87
0.00
10773
PI
S7
Norfolk
4.60
4.60
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
296
0
0
lrrig.
296
118.24
0.00
543.88
0.00
10773
PIO
S7
Norfolk
5.30
5.30
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
lrrig.
63
24.97
0-001
132.31
0.00
IV73
Pl0
S7
Norfolk
5.30
5.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9115
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
54.72
0.00
290.03
0.00
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/27/2006 WUT Page Page t of 6

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Source
Field ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm,
Ferl.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Apphc.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid Liquid Solid
Manure Manure Manure
Applied Applied Applied
(acre) (Field) (Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
galIA
Tons 1000 gals tons
10773
P1 l S7
Norfolk
4.40
4.40
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
911-4/30
125
0
0
brig.
63
24.97
0.00 109.85 0.00
10773
PH 1 S7
Norfolk
4.40
4.40
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
54.72
0.00 240.79 0.00
10773
1112 S7
Norfolk
5.30
5.30
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
91l-4130
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24.97
0.00 132.32 0.00
10773
1,12 S7
Norfolk
5.30
5.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9115
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
54.72
0.00 290.03 0.00
10773 1
1113 S7
Norfolk
2.80
2.80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24.97
0.00 69.90 0.00
10773
P13 S7
Norfolk
2.80
2,80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
411-9115
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
54-721
0.00 153.23 0.00
10773
1`14 S7
Norfolk
4.50
4.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24.97
0.00 112.34 0,00
10773
P14 S7
Norfolk
4.50
4.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crap
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
54.72
0.00 246.26 0.00
10773
P15 S7
Norfolk
4.50
4.50
Wheal, Grain
60 bu.
911-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24.97
0.00 112.34 0.00
10773
P15 S7
Norfolk
4.50
4.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
prig.
137
54.72
0.00 246.26 0,00
10773
P16 S7
Norfolk
3.80
3,80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24,97
0.00 94.87 0.00
10773
P16 S7
Norfolk
3.80
3.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9115
137
0
0
Irrig.
1371
54,72
0,00 207.95 0.00
10773
P17 S7
Norfolk
1.60
1.60
Wheat, Groin
60 bu.
9/14/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24.97
0.00 39,94 0.0
10773
P17 S7
Norfolk
1.60
1.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
07
54.72
0.00 87.56 0,00
10773
P2A S7
Norfolk
0.70
0.70
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
]trig.
50
19.97
0.00 13,98 0.00
10773
P2A S7
Norfolk
0.70
0.70
Hybrid Hermudagrass IJay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
296
0
0
]Trig.
296
118.24
0.00 82,76 0.00
10773
P213 S7
Norfolk
I.40
1.40
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
brig.
50
19,97
0.00 27.961 0.00
10773
1`213 S7
Norfolk
1.40
1.40
Hybrid Hermudagrass I lay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
296
0
0
In•ig.
296
118,24
0.00 165,53 0.00
10773
P3 S7
Norfolk
4.70
4.70
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig,
50
19.97
0.00 93.97 0.00
10773
P3 S7
Norfolk
4.70
4,70
Hybrid Dermudagrass flay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
296
0
0
Irrig.
296
118.24
0.00 555.70 0.00
)0773
P4 S7
Norfolk
1.40
1.40
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00 27.96 0,00
10773
P4 S7
Norfolk
1.40
1.40
Hybrid Dermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
311-9/30
296
0
0
brig.
296
1 18.24
0.00 165.53 0,00
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/27/2006 WUT Page Page 2 of 6

Waste Utilization Table
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Apphc.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Rcq'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Res.
(lbs1A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManuteA
pplied
(acre)
Solid Liquid
Manure Manure
Applied Applied
(acre) (Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
FN
N
1000
gal/A
Tons 1000 gals
tons
10773
P5
S7
Norfolk
0.40
0,40
Small Grain Overseed
1.0.Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
brig.
50
19,97
0,00 7.99
0.00
10773
P5
S7
Norfolk
0,40
0,40
Hybrid 13ermudagrass IIay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
296
0
0
brig.
2961
119.24
0.00 47.29
0.00
10773
P6
S7
Norfolk
1.30
1.30
Wheat, Grain
60 bu,
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
2497
0.00 32.45
0.00
10773
P6
S7
Norfolk
1,30
1.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu,
4n-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
54.72
0,00 71.14
0,00
10773
P7
S7
Norfolk
2.50
2.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24,97
0.00 62.41
0.00
10773
P7
S7
Norfolk
2.50
2.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig,
137
54.72
0.00 t36.81
0,00
10773
P8
S7
Norfolk
0.90
0.90
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
911-4130
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24.97
0.00 22.47
0,00
10773
P8
S7
Norfolk
0.90
0,90
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
54.72
0.00 49.25
0.00
10773
P9
S7
Norfolk
2.60
2.60
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10l1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0,00 51.93
0,00
10773
P9
S7
Norfolk
2.60
2.60
11ybrid 13ermudagrass Ilay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
296
0
0
Irrig,
296
118.24
0.00 307.41
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons 6,568. l0
'Total Produced, 1000 gallons 5,450,76'
� �,,
Balance, 1000 gallons-1,117.34
"
,
Total Applied, tons' • : i�
0.0
Total Produced, tons
s
0.00
Batance,tons
0.00
Notes: I. In the tract column, -- symbol means ]eased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1 W27/2006 WUT Page Page 3 of 6

WACYP I16079t1nn Tahle
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm,
Ferl.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManareA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal1A
Tons
I000 gals
tons
10773
13FI
S7
Norfolk
1.40
1.40
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Broad.
50
21.71
0.00
30.39
0.00
10773
13H
S7
Norfolk
1.40
1.40
Hybrid Bermudagrass May
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
296
0
0
Broad.
296
128.52
0.00
179.92
0.00
10773
1H
S7
Norfolk
1.00
1.00
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/3.0
125
0
0
Broad.
63
27,14
0.00
27.14
0.00
10773
1 H
S7
Norfolk
1.00
1.00
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
Broad,
111
48,191
0.00
48.19
0.00
10773
3H
S7
Norfolk
1.80
1.80
Wheal, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Broad.
63
27.14
0.00
48.84
0.00
10773
3H
S7
Norfolk
1.80
1.80
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
Broad.
111
48.19
0.00
86.75
0.00
10773
4H
S7
Norfolk
0.90
0.90
Small Grain Overseed
1,0 Tans
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Broad.
50
21.71
j 0.00
19.54
0.00
10773
411
S7
Norfolk
0.90
0.90
Hybrid Bennudagrass Flay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
296
0
0
Broad.
296
128.52
0.00
115.66
0.00
10773
5H
S7
Norfolk
1.20
1.20
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 'Pons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Broad.
50
21.71
0.00
26.05
0.00
10773
511
S7
Norfolk
1.20
1.20
1lybrid Bermudagrass Flay
6.5'fons
3/1-9/30
296
0
0
Broad.
296
128.52
0.00
154.22
0.00
10773
8H
S7
Norfolk
7.80
7.80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Broad.
63
27.14
0.00
211.66
0.00
10773
8H
S7
Norfolk
7.80
7.80
Com, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
Broad.
111
48.19
0,00
375.91
0.00
10773
P1
S7
Norfolk
4.60
4.601
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
91.87
0.00
10773
Pi
S7
Norfolk
4.60
4.60
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
296
0
0
Irrig.
296
118.24
0.00
543.88
0.00
10773
Pi0
S7
Norfolk
5.30
5.30
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1 4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24.97
0.00
132.32
0.00
10773
1110
S7
Norfolk
5.30
5.30
Com, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
Irrig.
111
44.34
0.00
234.99
0.00
10773
PH
S7
Norfolk
4.40
4.40
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
In-ig.
63
24.97
0.00
109.85
0.00
10773
1311
S7
Norfolk
4.40
4.40
Com, Grain
1 ] 5 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
Irrig.
111
44.34
0.00
195.09
0.00
10773
P12
S7
Norfolk
5.30
5.30
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24.97
0.00
132.32
0.00
10773
P12
S7
Norfolk
5.30
5.30
Cam, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
Irrig.
111
44.34
0.00
234.99
0.00
10773
P13
S7
Norfolk
2.80
2.80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24.97
0.00
69.90
0.00
10773
1 1`13
87
Norfolk
2.80
2.80
Com, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
Irrig.
111
44.34
0.00
124.1$
0.00
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/27/2006 WUT Page Page 4 of 6

Waste
Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYI:
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ilrs1A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbslA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
t000
gal1A
Tons
1000 gals
rolls
10773
1`14
S7
Norfolk
4.50
4.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
2497
0.00
112.34
0.00
10773
1`14
S7
Norfolk
4.50
4.50
Corn, Grain
It 5 bu.
2115-6/30
131
0
20
brig.
11 l
44.34
0.00
199.52
0.00
10773
P 15
S7
Norfolk
4.50
4.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14130
t 25
0
0
brig.
63
24.97
0.00
112.34
0.00
10773
P15
S7
Norfolk
4.50
4.50
Cam, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
Irrig.
111
44.34
0.00
199.52
0.00
10773
1`16
S7
Norfolk
3.80
3.80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24.97
0.00
94.87
0.00
10773
P16
S7
Norfolk
3.80
3.80
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
Irrig. I
111
44.34
0.00
168.48
0.00
10773
P17
S7
Norfolk
1.60
1.60
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
brig.
63
24.97
0.00
39.94
0.00
10773
P17
S7
Norfolk
1.60
1.60
Com, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6130
131
0
20
brig.
111
44.34
0.00
70.94
0.00
10773
P2A
S7
Norfolk
0.70
0.70
Small Grain Overseed
1.0'rons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
13.98
0.00
10773
P2A
S7
Norfolk
0.70
0,70
Hybrid Bemiudagrass Ilay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
296
0
1 0
IrTig.
296
118.24
0.00
82.76
0.00
10773
P2B
S7
Norfolk
1.40
1.40
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50 i
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
27.96
0.00
10773
P2B
S7
Norfolk
1.40
1.40
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
296
0
0
Irrig.
296
118.24
0,00
165.53
0,00
10773
P3
S7
Norfolk
4.70
4.70
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig,
50
19.97
0.00
93.87
0.00
10773
P3
S7
Norfolk
4.70
4.70
Hybrid Bermudagrass flay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
296
0
0
brig.
296
118.24
0.00
555.70
0.00
10773
P4
S7
Norfolk
1,40
1.40
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
19.97
0.00
27.96
0.00
10773
P4
87
Norfolk
1.40
1.40
Hybrid Bermudagrass [lay
6.5 Tons
311-9/30
296
0
0
Irrig.
296
119,24
0.00
165.53
0.00
t0773
P5
S7
Norfolk
0.40
0.40
Small Grain Overseed
1.OTons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
7.99
0.00
10773
115
S7
Norfolk
0.40
0.40
Flybrid Bermudagrass May
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
296
0
0
Irrig.
296
118.24
0.00
47,29
0,00
10773
P6
S7
Norfolk
1.30
1.3 01
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24.97
0.00
32.45
0,00
10773
P6
S7
Norfolk
1.30
1.30
Corn, Grain
115 bu,
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
IrTig.
HI 1
44.34
0.00
57.64
0.00
10773
P7
I S7
lNorfolk
2.50
2.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24.97
0.00
62.41
0.00
10773
1 P7
S7
Norfolk
2.50
:: 2.50
Cam, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
D
1 20
Irrig.
111
44.34
0.00
110.85
0.00
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/27/2006 WUT Page Page 5 of 6

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(IbslA)
Appiic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
10773
P8
S7
Norfolk
0.90
0.90
Wheat, Grain
60 bit,
911-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24.97
0.00
22.47
0.00
10773
P8
S7
Norfolk
0.90
0.90
Com, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
Irrig.
111
44.34
0.00
39.90
0.00
10773
P9
S7
Norfolk
2.60
2.60
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
51.93
0.00
10773
P9
S7
Norfolk
2.60
2,60
Hybrid Hermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
296
0
0
irrig.
296
l ] 8.24
0.00
307.41
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
6,065.22ift
~
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
5,450.76
Balance, 1000 gallons
-614.46
Total Applied, tons
tin .w
Imo*
0.00
Total Produced, tons
r "
s
0.00
Balance, tons
..�
0.0
Notes: I. In the tract column, symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol " means user entered data.
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/27/2006 WL1T Page Page 6 of 6

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
10773
P 1
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
10773
Pl0Nor-folk
0.50
1.0
10773
P11
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
10773
P 12
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
10773
P13
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
10773
P14
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
10773
P 15
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
10773
P16
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
10773
P17
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
10773
P2A
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
10773
P2B
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
10773
P3
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
10773
P4
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
10773
PS
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
10773
P6
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
10773
P7
Norfolk
0.50
1 A
10773
P8
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
10773
P9
orfolk
0.50
1.0
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 10/27/2006 IAF Page Page i of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan
developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan.
Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The
quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of other
nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized
to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so
as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,
additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
0
N
Qbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(ibs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
10773
13H
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
1.40
10/1 -3/3E
Supplied By:
MEMO
,. °
p
- � -
M,
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
i.0 Tons
1 03-02-06
Manure
50
30
74
7
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
15 Ibs/ac.
tow
BALANCE
0
30
54
7
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
10773
111
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
Acres
App. Period
1.00
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
.i".t
�' :"
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample Date
60 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
125
74
166
17
1
3
1
0
Rating
30 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
74
186
17
1
3
-1
0
ERc-.val
Field
10773
3H
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
App. Period
1.80
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
m_;
MUMN
nwa=
R va.-
W
CROP
Wheat, Gratin
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
01
0
0
01
0
mple Date
60 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
125
74
196
17
1
3
1
0
l Rating
30 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
74
186
17
1
3
1
0
E
Field
10773
4H
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
30
0
0
0
2
0
pp. Period
0.90
10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
NoTfalk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
03-02-06
Manure
50
30
74
7
0
I
0
0
P Removal
Rating
15 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
30
44
71
0
1 1
-2
0
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/27/2006 NM Page Page 1 of 13

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
0
N
(1bs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(Ibs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
10773
5H
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
0
0
D
D
0
0
Acres
App. Period
1.20
10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
am
BMW
MW
RMN
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample Date
1.0 Tons
03-02-06
Manure
50
30
74
7
0
1
0
0
EPRe-mc
val Rating
15 Ibs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
30
74
7
0
1
0
0
Field
10773
8H
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
10
0
0
0
0
1
App. Period
7.80
9/1-4/3o
Supplied By:
am
*00
-
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ar-ple Date
60 bu.
03-13-06
Manure
125
74
186
17
1
3
1
0
E
val Rating
30 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
74
176
17
1
3
1
-1
Field
10773
P1
Req'dNutrients
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
App. Period
4.60
] 0/1-3/31
Supplied By:
x
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
03-02-06
Manure
50
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
15 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
10773
P10
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
5.30
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
$
I,a;
_
lam
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
60 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
125
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
1
30 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
68
161
15
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
10773
P11
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
Acres I App.
Period
4.40
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
AM
am
INN
E-190mall
OEM
am
AM
dirm
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
D
Q
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
60 bu. 1
03-02-06
Manure
125
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
30 ibs/ac.
kw
BALANCE 1
0
68
171
15
1
3
-1
0
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/27/2006 NMR Page Page 2 of 13

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
Q
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(Ibs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
TTeld
10773
P12
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
5.30
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
60 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
125
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
30 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
10773
P13
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
10
0
0
0
Q
1
Acres
App. Period
2.80
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
..,, . �
1
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
01
0
'0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample Date
60 bu.
03-13-06
Manure
125
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
E
val Rating
30 Ibs/ac_
w
BALANCE
0
68
161
15
1
3
1
-1
Feld
10773
P14
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
0
0
0
Q
0
0
App. Period
4.50
911-4/30
Supplied By:
-
I
*M.
9":
&A=
a%=
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fem
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
60 bu.
03-13-06
Manure
125
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
30 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
Q
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
10773.
P15
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
4.50
911-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cotmnercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
60 bu.
03-13-06
Manure
125
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
30 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
Tract Feld
10773
P16
Req'd Nutrients
125
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
3.80
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
-� r z6--X,..�. qq
.�......:
i
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
60 bu. 03-13-06
Manure
125
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
P Removal
I Rating 1
30 lbs/ac. w
BALANCE
0
38
171
15
1
3
1
Q
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/27/2006 NMR Page Page 3 of 13

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
0
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
field
10773
P17
Req'd Nutrients
125
30
10
0
0
0
0
1
Acres
App. Period
1.60
9/14/30
Supplied By:
L
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Comrnercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
60 bu.
03-13-06
Manure
125
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
PRemoval
Rating
30lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
38
161
15
1
3
1
-1
Tract
Field
10773
P2A
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
0.70
10/1-3/31
SuMbed By:
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cornrnercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
le Date
1-0Tons
03-02-06
Manure
50
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
Rating
151bs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
R
Field
10773
P2B
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. Period
1.40
] 0/1-3131
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Corrurtercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample Date
1.0 Tons
03-02-06
Manure
50
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
Rating
15 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
EPRemoval
Field
10773
P3
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
0
0
0
0
0App,
Period
4.70
1011-3/31
SuppliedBy:
,-
M-0
I w f
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample
Date
1.0 Tons
03-02-06
Manure
50
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
EPR=.vat
Rating
15 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
Field
10773
P4
Reqd Nutrients
50
0
20
0
0
0
2
0
App. Period
1.40
10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
. y;=
'--
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
ol
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
03-02-06
Manure
50
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
PRemoval I Rating
15lbs/ac. fLow
BALANCE 1
0
27
48
6
0
1
-2
0
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/27/2006 NMR Page Page 4 of 13

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
0
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
10773
P5
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
30
0
0
0
2
0
Acres
App. Period
0.40
10/1-3/31
applied By:
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
le Date
1.0 Tons
03-02-06
Manure
50
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
R
Rating
151bs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
27
38
6
0
1
-2
0
Field
10773
P6
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Period
1.30
9/1 4/30
Supplied By:
..
,.
a � ..
_ M
'
:,,0
±3m
". . .
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample Date
60 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
125
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
E
val Raring
30 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
Field
10773
P7
Reqd Nutrients
125
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
App. Period
2.50
9/I4/30
Supplied By:
'`�
rNOM
slim
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
60 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
125
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
P Removal Rating
30 ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
10773
P8
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
50
0
0
0
0
1
Acres I
App. Period
0.90
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
- -
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
❑
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
60 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
125
68
171
15
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
30 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
68
1211
15
1
3
1
-1
Tract
Field
10773
P9
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I A
Pp- PeriodVIM
2.60
10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
NMI
_
� .,, fill
SEEN, �"
_ „
v ,
._ _ .
_ _ .__.
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
03-02-06
Manure
50
27
68
6
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
15 1bs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
27
48
6
0
1
0
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
156741 Database Version 3A Date Printed: 10/27/2006 NMR Page Page 5 of 13

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(]bs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
10773
13H
Req'd Nutrients
296
0
70
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
AM. Period
1.40
3/1-9130
Supplied By:
CROP
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sample
Date
6.5 Tons
03-02-06
Manure
296
175
441
39
2
7
1
0
val Rating
80 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
175
371
39
2
7
1
0
E
Field
10773
1H
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
0
0
0
0
0App.Period
1.00
4/1-9115
SuppliedBy:
'
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Conunercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Noffolk
Residual
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample Date
35 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
137
81
204
18
1
3
1
0
EPR.-.val
Rating
28lbslac.
w
BALANCE
0
81
204
18
1
3
1
0
Field
10773
3H
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
00
0
0
0
0
App. Period
1.80
4/1-9/15
Supplied By
.
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
e Date
35 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
137
81
204
18
1
3
1
0
Rating
28 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
81
204
18
1
3
1
0
PApp'Period
Field
10773
4H
Req'd ]Nutrients
296
0
]00
0
0
0
0
0
0.90
3/1-9130
Supplied By:
MW
ImpmA
;;
.
CROP
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Noffolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE sample
Date
6.5 Tans
03-02-06
Manure
296
175
441
39
2
7
1
0
P Removal Rating
80 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
175
341
39
2
7
1
0
Tract Field
10773
514
Req'd Nutrients
296
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
1.20
3/1-9/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil] Series
orfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
6.5 Tons
03-02-06
Manure
296
175
441
39
2
7
1
0
P Removal
Rating
80 lbslac.
w
BALANCE
0
175
441
39
21
71
1 1
4
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/27/2006 NMR Page Page 6 of 13

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Fie]d
10773 8H
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
7.80 411-9/I S
Supplied By:
-
"
i x"i r1
„ -'" .,R
7� k
� s"'
x
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Felt
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
35 bu.
03-13-06
Manure
137
81
204
18
1
3
1
0
P R-0-1
Rating
28 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
81
194
18
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
10773
P1
Req'd Nutrients
296
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
4.60
3/1-9/30
Supplied By:
�
~�
r��
311--
+
s TI!,
CROP
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
le Date
6.5 Tons
03-02-06
Manure
296
161
405
36
1
7
1
0
R
Raring
80 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
161
405
36
1
7
1
0
Field
10773
P10
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
. Period
5.30
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
='�` =
L...,. i" '..n:
a
°�nx.... -` �
`?x;.
.i4' 1UMIM
^w4is
i�.,,
' g
� .CENT
r, p_
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
35 bu.
1 03-02-06
Manure
137
75
188
17
1
3
1
0
P Remova! Raring
28 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
75
178
17
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
10773
PH
Req d Nutrients
137
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
4A0
4/1-9115
Supplied By:
_
r "216
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fort_
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
35 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
137
75
188
17
1
3
1
0
P Removal I Rating
28 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
75
188
17
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
10773
P12
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App.
Period
5.30
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
D
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
35 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
137
75
188
17
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
28 16s/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
75
188
17
11
3
1
0
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/27/2006 NMR Page Page 7 of 13

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
Obs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
Obs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
10773
P 13
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
] 0
0
0
0
0
4
Acres App. Period
2.80
411-9/15
Supplied By:
EM
AMIRM
P-MUMMI
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
D
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
orfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample Date
35 bu.
03-13-06
Manure
137
75
188
17
1
3
1
0
E
val Rating
28 War.
w
BALANCE
0
75
178
17
1
3
1
0
Field
10773
P14
Reqd Nutrients
137
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
App. Period
4.50
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
„ - `
Mk
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
le Date
35 bu.
03-13-06
Manure
137
75
188
17
1
3
1
0
P
Rating
28 lbs/ac-
w
BALANCE
0
75
198
17
1
3
1
0
Field
10773
P15
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. Period
4.50
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert_
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
le Date
'35 bu.
03-13-06
Manure
137
75
189
17
1
3
1
0
Rating
28 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
75
188
17
1
3
1
0
RApp-Period
Field
10773
P16
Req'd Nutrients
137
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.80
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
l
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
35 bu.
03-13-06
Manure
137
75
188
17
1
3
1
0
P Removal Rating
28 Ibslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
45
188
17
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
10773
P17
Req'd Nutrients
137
30
10
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App.
Period
1.60
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
_ _
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
35 bu.
03-13-06
Manure
137
75
188
17
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating 1
28 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE 1
0
45
178
17
1
3
1
0
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/27/2006 NMR Page Page 9 of 13

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(Ibs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(ibs/A)
i Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field 10773 P2A
Req'd Nutrients
296
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App, Period 0.70 3/1-9130
Supplied By:
CROP Hybrid Bermudagrass
Hay
Starter
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Corr menial Fen.
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date 6.5 Tons
03-02-06
Manure
296
161
405
36
1
7
1
0
P Removal
Rating 80 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
01
161
405
36
1
7
1
0
Tract
Field 10773
P2B
Req'd Nutrients
296
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
APP. Period 1.40
3/1-9130
Supplied By:OM
CROP Hybrid Bermudagrass
Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date 6.5 Tons
03-02-06
Manure
296
161
405
36
1
7
1
0
P Removal
Rating 80 lbs/ac.
LOW
BALANCE
0
161
405
36
1
7
1
0
Tract
Field 10773
P3
Req'd Nutrients
296
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period 4.70
3/1-9/30
Supplied By:
r..
CROP Hybrid Bermudagrass
Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert-
0
0
0
0:
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date 6.5 Tons
03-02-06
Manure
296
161
405
36
1
7
1
0
P Removal
Rating 80 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
161
375
36
1
7
1
0
Tract Field 10773
P4
Req'd Nutrients
296
0
70
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period 1.40
311-9130
Supplied By:
"OEM
CROP Hybrid Bermudagrass
Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Norfolk
Residual
0
Q
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date 6.5 Tons
1 03-02-06
Manure
296
161
405
36
1
7
1
0
P Remo-1
Rating 80 lbs/ac,
Low
BALANCE
0
161
335
36
1
7
1
0
FTract
Field 10773
P5
Req'd Nutrients
296
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
cres I App-
Period 0.40
3/1-9130
Supplied By:
�
JL�
�
CROP Hybrid Bermudagrass
Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date 6.5 Tons
03-02-06
Manure
296
161
405
36
1
7
1
0
P Removal
Rating 80 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
161
305
36
1
7
1
0
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/27/2006 NM Page Page 9 of 13

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(Ibs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
10773
P6
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
1.30
4/1-9/15
Supplied BY:
f�ff�,.�
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
te
35 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
137
75
188
17
1
3
1
0ng
28 Ibs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
75
188
17
1
3
1
0
F
10773
P7
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
od
2.50
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
mim
` _a;=
w-
in
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ple Date
35 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
137
75
188
17
1
3
1
0
Rating
28 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
75
188
17
1
3
1
0
DA
Field
10773
P8
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
p. Period
0-90
4/1-4/15
Supplied By:
_
`g'iEW
.'E
;
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Conmtercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0:
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample
Date
35 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
137
75
188
17
1
3
1
0
EPR=noval
Rating
28 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
75
138
17
1
3
1
0
Field
10773
P9
Req'd Nutrients
296
0
70
0
0
0
0
0
App. Period
2.60
3/1-9/30
applied By:'
CROP
Hybrid Bermudagrass
Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
01
0
01
01
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
6.5 Tons
03-02-06
Manure
296
161
405
36
1
7
1
0
P Removal Rating
80 ]bs/ac.
w
BALANCE 1
0
161
335
36
] 1
7
1
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user enterers data.
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/27/2006 NMR Page Page 10 of 13

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Held
10773
1H
Rtq'dNutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
I bO
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
rt `
M
Eam
L
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
D
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fem
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
115 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
111
66
165
15
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
51 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
66
165
15
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
10773
3H
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
Period
1.80
2/15-6130
lied B
�
P
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
D
o
0
4
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample Date
115bu.
03-02-06
Manure
111
66
165
15
1
3
1
0
val Rating
51 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
66
165
15
1
3
1
0
E
Field
10773
8H
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
10
0
0
0
D
0
App. Period
7.80
2/15-6/30
SuppliedBy:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample Date
115 bu.
03-13-06
Manure
Hi
66
165
15
1
3
1
0
Rating
51 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
66
155
15
1
3
1
EPRe--inoval
Field
10773
P10
Reqd Nutrients
131
0
10
0
0
0
0App.
Period
5.30
2/15-6130
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
115 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
111
60
152
14
1
3
0
0
P Removal
Rating
51 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
60
142
14
1
3
0
0
Tract
Field
10773
PH
Req'dNutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
4.40
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
k._ w
. - ..,._. .Y.«
" y
�:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
115 bu.
03-02-06 1
Mantire
Ili
60
152
141
1
3
0
0
P Removal
Rating
51 lbs/ac.
w I
BALANCE 1
0
60
152
14
1
3
0
0
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/27/2000 NM Page Page I of 13

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
Z
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
TField
10773
P12
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
5.30
2!]5-6130
Supplied BY:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cormnercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
115 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
111
60
152
14
1
3
0
0
P Removal
Rating
51 ibs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
60
152
14
1
3
0
0
Tract
Field
10773
P13
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
2.80
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
wr
xWMASM
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
115 bu.
03-13-06
Manure
111
60
152
14
1
3
0
0
P Removal
Rating
51 Ibs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
60
142
14
1
3
0
0
Tract
Field
10773
P14
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
4.50
2/15-6130
applied By:
+�
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
Corrmtercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Soil Series
Norfbllc
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
115 bu.
03-13-06
Manure
111
60
152
14
1
3
0
0
P Removal
Rating
51 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
60
152
14
1
3
0
0
Tract
Field
10773
P15
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
4.50
2/15-6130
Supplied By:
ml
PRW
M
WM
MW
NO
UUM.
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Felt.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample
Date
115bu.
03-13-06
Manure
111
60
152
14
1
3
0
0
val
Rating
51 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
60
152
14
!
3
0
0
R
Field
10773
P16
Req'dNutrients
131
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
App. Period
3.80
2/15-0130
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
115 Ea
u.
03-13-06
Manure
111
60
152
14
1
3
D
0
P Removal
Rating 1
51 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
30
152
14
1 1
3
0
0
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1012712006 NMR Page Page 12 of 13

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
10773
P l7
Req d Nutrients
131
30
10
0
0
0
0
0
A --;I
App. Period
1.60
2/15 6/34
Supplied By:
t`T
r
T
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
115 bu.
03-13-06
Manure
111
60
152
14
1
3
0
0
P Removal
Rating
51 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
30
142
14
1
3
0
0
Tract Field
10773
P6
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
1,30
2115-6/30
Supplied B
s-
_
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
115 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
111
60
152
14
1
3
0
0
P Removal
Rating
51 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
60
152
14
1
3
0
0
Tract
Field
10773
P7
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
2.50
2/15-6130
Supplied By:
e
CROP
Corn, Grain
starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Comrnercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
115 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
111
60
152
14
1
3
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
1
51 lbs/ac,
Low
BALANCE
0
60
152
14
1
3
0
0
Tract
Field
10773
Pg
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
�� Period
0.90
2/15-6l30
Supplied By:
m
CROP
Com, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cortnnemial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
115 bu.
03-02-06
Manure
111
60
152
14
1
3
0
4
P Removal
Rating
51 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE 1
0
60
102
14
1
3
0
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/27/2006 NMR Page Page 13 of 13

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of
capper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth.
Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and
zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85, By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we
can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of
lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production.
Reauired Soil Test Values
Tract
Field
Crap
PH
Lime Recom,
(tons/acre)
Ca-1
Copper Recommendation
Zn-1
'Zinc Recommendation
10773
13H
Small Grain Overseed
5.9
0.0
37
None
91
None
10773
1311
Hybrid Aermudagrass Hay
5.9
0.0
37
None
91
None
10773
11-1
Wheat, Grain
6.0
0.0
23
None
1 t7
None
10773
1H
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.0
0.0
23
None
117
None
10773
1 H
Corn, Grain
6.0
0.0
23
None
117
None
10773
3H
Wheat, Grain
6.0
0.0
59
None
I
None
10773
3H
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.0
0.0
59
None
l l ]
None
10773
3H
Com, Grain
6.0
0.0
59
None
l 11
None
10773
4H
Small Grain Overseed
6.4
0.0
17
None
86
None
10773
4H
Hybrid Bermudagrass flay
6.4
0.0
17
None
86
None
10773
5H
Small Grain Overseed
6.4
0.0
124
None
207
None
10773
5H
Hybrid Hermudagrass Hay
6.4
0.0
124
None
207
None
10773
8H
Wheat, Grain
5.7
0.5
36
None
62
None
10773
8H
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.7
0.0
36
None
62
Notre
10773
8H
Corn, Grain
5.7
0.0
36
None
62
None
10773
P1
Small Grain Overseed
6.0
0.0
39
None
104
None
10773
P1
Hybrid 13ermudagrass Hay
6.0
0.0
39
None
104
None
10773
PIO
Wheat, Grain
6.1
0.0
33
None
133
None
10773
P10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.1
0.0
33
None
133
None
10773
PIO
Cam, Grain
6.1
0.0
33
None
133
None
10773
PH
Wheat, Grain
6.0
0.0
23
None
117
None
10773
P1 l
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.0
0.0
23
None
117
None
10773
P1 l
Corn, Grain
6.0
0.0
23
None
117
INone
-•--------------------------------------------------------------------------------•----------------------- -------•-------- ----------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-27-2006 STV Page Page 1 of 3

Rprnnrpri Cnil 'I'aet Vahrpe
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
lime Recom.
(tons/acre)
Cu-1
Copper Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc Recommendation
10773
P12
Wheat, Grain
5.9
010
42
None
119
None
10773
P12
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.9
0.0
42
None
119
None
10773
P12 lCom,
Grain
5.9
0.0
42
None
119
None
10773
P13
Wheat, Grain
5.7
0.5
36
None
62
None
10773
Pt3
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.7
0.0
36
None
62
None
10773
P13
Corn, Grain
5.7
0.0
36
None
62
None
10773
P14
Wheat, Grain
5.9
0.0
47
None
73
None
10773
P14
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.9
0.0
47
None
73
None
10773
P14
Com, Grain
5.9
0.0
47
None
73
None
10773
P15
Wheat, Grain
6.0
0.0
56
None
92
None
10773
1`15
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.0
0.0
56
None
92
None
10773
P15
Com, Grain
6.0
0.0
56
None
92
None
10773
P16
Wheat, Grain
6.2
0.0
40
None
75
None
10773
P16
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.2
0.0
40
None
75
None
10773
P16
Com, Grain
6.2
1 0.0
40
None
75
None
10773
P17
Wheat, Grain
5.6
0.7
27
None
91
None
10773
P17
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.6
0.0
27
None
91
None
10773
P 17
Corn, Grain
5.6
0.0
27
None
91
None
10773
P2A
Small Grain Overseed
6.4
0.0
124
None
207
None
10773
P2A
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.4
0.0
124
None
207
None
10773
P2B
Small Grain Overseed
6.2
0.0
28
None
116
None
10773
P2B
Hybrid Bermudagrass flay
6.2
0.0
28
None
116
None
10773
P3
Small Grain Overseed
6.7
0.0
30
Norte
100
None
t0773
P3
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.7
0.0
30
None
100
None
10773
P4
S-11 Grain Overseed
6.4
0.0
25
None
177
None
10773
P4
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.4
0.0
25
None
177
None
10773
P5
Small Grain Overseed
6A
0.0
17
None
H6
None
10773
P5
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.4
0.0
17
None
86
None
10773
P6
Wheat, Grain
6.0
0,0
59
None
III
None
10773
P6
I Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.0
0.0
59
None
III
None
... ------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•--------------- -------- -----------------------------------------------------------
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-27-2006 STV Page Page 2 of 3

Required Soil Test Values
'tract
field
Crop
pil
Lime Recom.
(tons/acre)
Cu-I
Copper Recommendation
Zn-1
Zinc Recommendation
10773
P6
Corn, Grain
6.0
0.0
59
None
111
None
10773
P7
Wheat, Grain
5.9
0.0
52
None
115
None
10773
1 P7
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.9
0.0
52
None
115
None
10773
P7
Cam, Grain
5.9
0.0
52
None
115
None
10773
P8
Wheat, Grain
5.2
1.0
40
None
80
None
10773
P8
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.2
0.0
40
None
g0
None
10773
I'S
Corn, Grain
5.2
0.0
40
None
g0
None
10773
P9
Small Grain OVCTSeed
5.9
0.0
37
None
91
None
10773
P9
I Hybrid Hermudagrass Hay
5.9
0.0
37
1 None
91
None
-------•---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•------------------------•-----------------------------------------------------------------
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-27-2006 STV Page Page 3 of 3

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source,
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column -
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes,
phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lblac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
73-71
147.43
221.14
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E-
300
26.32
36.$6
73.71
110.57
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.0-4
69.11
138.21
207.32
----------- ----------------------------•----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-27-2006 Sludge Page Page i of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
141
1
2
151
1
3
149
1
4
176
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
10
154
1
11
129
1
12
101
2
1
73
2
2
79
2
3
90
2
4
112
2
5
133
2
6
163
2
7
163
2
8
155
2
9
157
2
10
147
2
11
155
2
12
143
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
- ------ ---- --------------------- ---- ---------------- ------ ------- --- ----- ----------------------------------------- ---- ---------- -- ---- -----------------
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-27-2006 Capacity Page Page I of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/27/2006 Specification Page 1

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
-------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/27/2006 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. 1f animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
------------------------------------------------
156741 Database Version 3.1
-------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Date Printed: 10/27/2006 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1H, 3H, 8H, P10, P11, P12, P13, P14, P15, P16, P17, P6, P7,
P8
Corn: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leaching
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is nonnally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 13H, 4H, 5H, P1, P2A, P2B, P3, P4, P5, P9
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately WeII Drained.
Adaptation: WeII-adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced F to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
------------------------------------------
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-27-2006 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): 13H, 4H, 511, P1, P2A, P213, P3, P4, P5, P9
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1 H, 3H, 8H, P 10, P l l , P 12, P 13, P 14, P 15, P 16, P 17, P6, P7,
P8
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining
N should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type.
Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat.
Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•----------------------
156741 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-27-2006 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1H, 3H, 811, P10, P11, P12, P13, P14, P15, P16, P17, P6, P7,
P8
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medium leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 5674 1 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-27-2006 Crop Note Page Page 3 of 3

Calculations for Hone a on Acreage
Tract #10773
FSA Field #8 26.6 Total Acres
Pulls 13-17 - 17.0
9.6 Max
- 1.8 Buffers
8H 7.8 Acres
FSA Field #5 14.5 Total Acres
Pulls 1-3 - 11.4
3.1 Max
- 1.3 Buffers
- .6 Wells
5H 1.2 Acres
FSA Field #4 3.1 Total Acres
Pulls 4-5 - 1.9
1.2 Max
- .3 Buffers
4H .9 Acres
FSA Field #3 7.9 Total Acres
Pulls 6-8 - 4.8
3.1 Max
1.3 Buffers
3H 1.8 Acres
FSA Field #1 17.7 Total Acres
Pulls 10-12 - 15,0
2.7 Max
- 1.7 Buffers
1 H 1.0 Acres
FSA Field #13 4.3 Total Acres
Pull 9 - 2.6
1.7 Max
- .3 Buffers
13H 1.4 Acres
* Buffers were measured using irrigation design map drawn by JPB approved by William
Carl Dunn 4/5/02.

CONSERVATION PLAN MAP
Date: 10/2012006
Customer(s): HOMER GARY BAGGETf
District: SAMPSON SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Field Office: CLINTON USDA SERVICE
Agency: USDA-NRCS
Assisted By: Melanie Harris
Legend
HOMER_GARY—BAGGETT-----BAGGHO-Consplan N
O County Boundary 330 0 330 660 990 1,320
�� Feet
Image: 2005Aerial Photography

All,
'14)

Barber, .dim
From: Barber, Jim
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 2:04 PM
To: '[e-mail]'; Guyton, Steve
Subject: Gary Baggett & Son: 82-44
Attachments: MVC-049S.JPG; MVC-050S.JPG; MVC-051S.JPG; MVC-052S.JPG
Scott;
Attached with this email are the photos taken during our visit to the Gary Baggett farm in Sampson County.
MVC-049S shows the reel and gun in the Bermuda field that was sprayed that morning;
MVC-050S is a photo of the air release valve and hydrant, in the adjacent corn field, with the valve leaking. This valve is
approx. 125' from Feed Mill road;
MVC-051S is a the Bermuda field with reel & gun, wooded area and drainage conveyance. The reel & gun are approx. 80'
from the wooded area/drainage conveyance and at the time of our site visit wastewater was visible on the foliage in the
trees and on the grass in the drainage conveyance.
MVC-052S is a picture of the farm sign with farm name.
We arrived at the Baggett farm at 9:45am and departed at 10.25am to visit the Robert Jackson farm. We returned to Mr.
Baggett's farm at 10:50 and departed at 11:00am after speaking with Mr. Gary Baggett at the finishing houses. We
discussed with Mr. Baggett the need to repair the malfunctioning air valve and when spraying the Bermuda field to be
aware of the distance that wastewater was being "thrown" so as to keep the wastewater on the permitted "wetted
acreage".
Mr. Baggett's cell number is 910-385-5923.

�0� 1N A rF;Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
`Ct G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
-� Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 1, 2007
Homer Gary Baggett
Gary Baggett & Son
1145 Feedmill Rd
Roseboro, NC 28382-7147 ...
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS820044
Gary Baggett & Son
Animal Waste Management System
Sampson County
Dear Homer Gary Baggett:
In accordance with your application received on 4-Jan-07, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Homer Gary Baggett, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Gary Baggett & Son, located in Sampson County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 5880 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July. 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition I11.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pav
careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Ow
NorrthCamlina
Nawrally
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: (9l9) 733-3221
Internet: www.ncwatemualitr.ors Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recyded/10% Post Consumer Paper Customer Service: (877) 623- i748

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0111(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection staff may be reached at 910-433-3300. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at (919) 733-
3221.
Sincerely, -
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Sampson County Health Department
Sampson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS820044

N

-:T- , ,'� -.--3 -7 �
� - 4, e�v;�;7-5-
4W-
3 q-, -7 -<-7?.3-
7`5
-yip �- s��
3 6— - I/ , 1-3 —?,
7?-, / a : A-�
3,6-; C>.3
7
,-3 q ,
Iz-

�• State of North Carolina
of Environment, Health and . Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
QUC o i `44]Non-Discharge Permit Application Form 1 Survey
('THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
FA��ermit - Liq
. uid Animal Waste Operations
i1t
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the
Division. Please review the information for Completeness and make any corrections
which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please
complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered.
Application Date: 7 — Z) 1 7
I. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
1. One completed and signed original and one copy cif the application for General Permit -Animal
Waste Operations;
2. Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and ¢��
field locations where animal waste is disposed; �/
3. Two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). if the facility does
not have a CAWMP, one must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION:
k I--_
I . Farm's name: Gary Baggett & Son
2. Print Land Owner's nacre: Gary Baaeett S
3. Land Owners Mang address: 1 145 Feed Mill ad
City: Roseboro NC Zip: 2832
Telephone Number. 5f�4-4 96
4. County where farm is located: Sampson
5. Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): , SR 1459 and 1 mile off Hwy. 421 and 15 miles North of
Clinton NC._
6. Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
7. Lessee's Integrator'. ame (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): nr n=��•^ F^^- __
82-44
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 1 of 3

III. OPERATION INFORMATION:
I. Farm No.: 82-44
2. Operation Description: Swine operation
Feeder to Finish
5880 - Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; El no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
Tvoe of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No_ of Animals Tyne of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow) ,� J
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: IV �' No. of Animals: -�
3. Acreage cleared and available for application: 100.0 ;Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP):-• +-M '7�7, Ili/
_
4. Number of Lagoons: 2 ; Total Capacity: 1 1 7 7 Cubic Feet (ft3)
Number of Storage Ponds: ; Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3)
5. Is animal waste being applied on any field which has subsurface drains? YES or A
(please circle one)
6. Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity of or under the lagoon? YES or(please circle one)
IV. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I• '� a�tcli %3,f • (Land Owner's name listed in question 1I.2), attest that
this application for (77CZ r` ` f, f 5 D to (Farm name listed in question H. I)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as.incomnlete. ,
Signature l�
L_
Date �% .2 / � 7
V . MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
1, (Manager's name listed in question 1I.6), attest that this
application for (Faun name listed in question 11.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 2 of 3

i.
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Producer: GARY BAGGETT
Location: FEED MILL ROPb
ROSEBORO NC 28382
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Feeder to F'nish Swine
Number of Animals: 5880.00 hogs '
(Design Capacity) v
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation -C
;v
w
rn
F,
Tj
-yt rn
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at less
than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen.. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff -to surface waters which is not allowed
under DEM regulations.
Page. 1

i
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
------------------------ '---------------- - - - - -- -;----------------------
5. Wind conditions should also be consid'red to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients�for crop production
and to reduce the potential for poll tion, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or fora es breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will c nserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
5880 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 11172 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
5880 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 13524 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time an,
have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the
crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page: 2

�1
f
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN l
------------------------------- 8---------------------- ---------------
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
t`ll;L1) 1�Vllj 'i yet' & UIJA66 - uxue Y It LJLJ bbb L UlvlPvl lv — " trtSIli
DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PEA ACRES AW N
PER AC USED
----- r-------
APPLY RE ID. APPLIC
METH N TIME
)773 1 NoA C 110 137.5 17.9 24G1.25
I MAR-JUN
)773 IWA 1 1100 117.9 11790
I SEP-APR
)773
j
13
lNoA
IC
1110
1137.5
17.6
1104510R
)773
1
1-3
1
IWA
I
1100
17.6
1760
SEP-APR
)773
14
INOA
IC
I
1110
1137.5 1
13.5
1481.25
MAR-JUN
)773
�14
1
IWA
I
1100
13.5
1350
SEP-APR
)773
4
NoA
BH
6.1
I
I
1305---
1
13.0
1915
MAR-OCT
i773
G
0
1-4
I
I
11
150
1
j3
1150
SEP-MAY
)773
5
NoA
BH
6.1
305
14.3
li
14361.5
MAR-OCT
;773
SG
1-5
1
I
il
150
114.3
1715
SEP-MAY
)773
5A
NoA
BH
6.1
I
305
1
1.5
I
457.5
I
MAR-OCT
)773 1 --5A 1 I SG 11 150 1 11.
SEP-MAY
END
I
TOTA1,I13561.5
t
n.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
--------------------------------------------------}-i-------__-----------
- Indicates that t-his field is being overseeded ( .le. interplanted)
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. In the future, re lations may require
farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient managemen
plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitroge
------------------------------------------------------------
~ Page: 4

1It
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
------------------------------- I---------- --- ----------�-'--------------
4
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG 'PERM LEASE
(Agreement with -adjacent landowners must be at ached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COI- N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
P R
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
C
USED
----
or
------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLI
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. . This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier_ You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseedin
~ Page: 5

NIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
--------- - - - - -- - - --
- -- •---------------- - -L - ------ --- - - - ---
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total r Qui el nitrogen.le
any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied. r r
The following legend explains the crop codes used in �abls 1 and 2 abo
i I
-
CROP CODE
CROP
IUNI
S
PER UNI
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50 -
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
AC
50
WA
WINTER ANNUALS (I.E. Small Grains, etc.)
AC
100
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
**
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS W N USED
47.5- +
13561.5
0
0
47.6
13561.5
* BAIANCE
-37.5
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
. Page: f

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
1
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in ord i to fully ut.iliz�
the animal waste N produced. +
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the usab:
acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along di$ches, odd areas
unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receivi g full applicatioi
rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acre shown in the
tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 2175.6 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 10878
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 36.26 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 87.024 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation d signer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irriga e the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommends rates and
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
---------------------------------°-----------.-------------------------
fl
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Ap
lic: A ount
(in es)
10773
1
NoA
C
0.40
*2.35
10773
14
NoA
C
0.40
*2.3
10773
3
NoA
C
0.40
*2. 5
10773
4
NoA
BH
0.50
* .3
10773
5
NoA
BH
0.50
* 30
10773
5A
NoA
BH
0.50
1.30
10773
-1
WA
10773
--14
WA
10773
-3
WA
10773
-4
SG
10773
--5
SG
10773
--5A
SG
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions_
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00 month:
Iri no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in your stricture
be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage -or one foot of freeboard excel
in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm. i
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure
that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the correct rate:
to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended
rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan
invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report
for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper
application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Page: 9

i
.1.
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
---------------------------------- °----- - - - - -.------ - - - - ---
-- -; - - --
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the st �e by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application for
direct discharge during operation or land application. 1Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that Lhe
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of ad quate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the pro user does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall'be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing cropp,,: in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a dlepth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
__ Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
-------------------------------------------------.-----------
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS �I
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils shoLd be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied m=
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways_
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged.into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly inton water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
Protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should -be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge. j
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
- - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - '2 - - - - - - - .. - - -
I
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and j
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the I
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.,,,
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, lea s,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kep on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when thes
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three {3}
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina requlations.
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
--------=------------------------------------°'----
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:GARY BAGGETT & SON
Owner manager Agreement
I'(we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM) before
the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface
wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-
year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at
the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDEM
upon request_
Name of Facility Owner: GARY BAGGETT
( Please _ print)
Signature: 2Date:
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Wilson Spencer
Affiliation:NRCS
Address (Agency)
Signature:
Phone No.
84 County Complex Rd.
Clinton NC 28328
t e .
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page: 13

lip
Pr-
�� ..... � •, : � �j 11 dd! r s:., /
t: J qy;,, 44ff�F.+•.wr++jl'•'w..r. - .V. a.y �' A74
MIS
I
1. - rti Yam;. •��•, i ' I r � �'y'
J
r
1