820018_INSPECTIONS_20171231

Type of Visit: EYClompliance inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
�PI�IIIIIIIIIIII�. LI I
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: I Y77-371Departure Time: ,'D�% County: Region:
Farm Name: Z r6� .#Q �, ' aX,4 -- Owner Email: �—
fT I
Owner Name: +CNv ✓d T riC Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ZD�� Title: 6*LG ..Jij e- / Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: A
Certified Operator: Certification Number: / g-D(n
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
:•1
i'f 'I II. i -i #"'. IIr, l't4 IS' I "II:. II Ii { 4' 'IrS '1 1 II. 'Ir' IS:
i.�l 1 _ }. : i:..a..:ll!+ .III! �I Ii II.'I!''4{ I :.Its I '� Il Y.{!. {I 1 - :1.lip lli': e I V II �.� I,:.
-:ai =r., z ... ,told+ ` :IIII :. F, 1, ,Y. . I.:I{�E ".r -. p..' t_ -:.. ll '.:# 1•':, . .II tl #�#!I�tn d: ,
�I��#�,-'Desi n!I+:,�Current�1,,, EE I`i ,�,h41 I, �IIIIIppI,I ,-:.::Desi ni.=Currentl',;1,{l'���,i'I'illlit�,;7+i',Ili��l
I 17„ I
l III '1 I-{I'i' 1Y,11 4 I
!j 1 i I 'I I1�1 I!: IIlN�.1,1 ,i"�. '•E
{!„ Y, I I r i+. - �s L.,l i 1i11„t1'I{, .ip„ ... pl ,
�.,. rr °,II,IVY,fl:i;::1,�':�FEDesipnt;iICurrent(;+-r
Il. jj
�,
iAf:l,!
�' F i _1�I�i,fl ali�I; :'tll 'I1 1 L1 i,g I'll` �I °li `1jl€�I .{{.i..tY. II 16 h' I- :1S•n1lr .,i'i,`,:,
I { 1- • -:` a�,l 1.11 .,Y 1 1 d .rsSi1 . �,j I,i.. 1� 1 .I ..... , ' : Y I :. i:. . •j f E_ l31'I� a ':I� Ifl lS i rl. il' rrl'i^
Hl'I,5wtne ] {{ lJ;:,,,;! , tl:: II�IIIVC�a actt alliyPo l i 41 1 },I:,.rWetiPo161 t71 33 act : ='l'o I I,
fY
rl r lll� r:,' III, .•4 b i :E 1::f l o� r' -r. •`
.1,.I'41i ,q1
I. �Ir� :llt i � I ,.I ,. III l {"� it • .•..I�I i.. I
h GI,Cattl!I I i 1. I';!Ca act
f, ;r
b
•i I{ I I I 1=' L I,l I 'Ca
P. y P. I .:l P P
n I a r
6vrllIII:ihllEil{€IIIlt�11111�rIr,{irwl,li.I11��IILeB1Il411l:a.ar:iiSrLriiN:h�aH,._Illllluii..n„iM�i'�Ler"41d4#I,�IAllluiSi�.altltt•,L�:41Ed# ir4.re...^,.$.�ll�y
I P.:
n€ ! 1 tl
,i,ill9l:,f,19:.•I;L..fa,.!�h.�.r. I,.,�III��::1.�Jv�1.I:tr,,.`IIswl,:aY+Yll,irllt,Illl#t.rl,l4f=},l.
I,
Wean to Finishi
La er
Dai Cow
I
Wean to Feeder
]Non -Layer ��
I
Dai Calf
3+1i s;
}h s#i
{ll'1
feeder to Finish
�lrJ
r�
t
I'x
it
I
��I
Dair Heifer
;�-
D Cow
11
Farrow to Wean
F { Y il'�I ` i I ! rl {I 4
11 �I
f 14J CI I r Desi n 1 Current k}}
-�+tl �I I li l 4 I ��i I+f� 1 �1PI ,�
Far to Feeder
I "ID �P•oult}'",�,rll,a',Ca act li��r!Po ntl,
,�;;
Non -Dairy
I�:
Beef Stocker
I I I
!
Farrow to Finish
i 1.
Layers
I
� Il
Gilts
�; i;
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder j'tl
Boars
,I. ll�:
Pullets
_
Beef Brood Cow i
a1 I1
1c I
iil
!iYIy 1
{I ! r ICI f a3 ^.";:l? �i
I.
0
1 ;i I';°' y'11 '.II IIj •
f 1
Turkeyss
.I
!I'
Othr:l
TurkeyPoults
Other
4t,� l.
I}jr
il,l l�hlliu�ir,lil lr,l�!:r�lall:'�L-lir!#rj�IISIY "i�alu #Lisu��:ralr, llllt .'.r4lr. si•II,.•.tr.�il?I�r.
iOther
.• :: m,.: nll.I. .,_x.u�rl ",,.,,I .,I•:.L,.-•,.ae.:.-- -,1 ,.n ,lmnl.-,.. u�uwl'
,L..c..:.
r,.:nllt ll.,o:•'a,.,I,I,I,•e,.,.,••������..•,:,,-,..Iraa..:.,lw,l,.,.r„,,1,.:1�II,
Discharges and Stream lmpacts
. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
E rNo❑
NA
❑ N E
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
{] No
[] NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWI?)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
fo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facilit Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
E3 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[] NA
❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
31" o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[-Nb
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
(-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[ -lqo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[}'hTo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
[] NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window/ ❑ Evidence/of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s): eo'-'-1 /Glil"Al ►,
13. Soil Type(s): Xj0 .b Nb'4--
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[2�<,o
❑ NA
[] NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
EDI�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
[] Yes
7 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[]-No
0 NA
❑ NE
_Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑`No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
[] Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other;
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑-N-o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
[� N
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
• 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? Ifyes, check ❑ Yes [31�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop.a POA for sludge levels
❑Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ffN ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
[2-<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concem?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
[] Yes
EJ�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
E!rN o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑INo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
2-<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatui
Page 3 of 3
Phone: Iry J�--D/✓��
Date:
21412015

U Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - I® 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
:w 0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: oZU'une
nce Inspect€on Operation Review Structure Evaluation Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1-1 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: Zg,,, e ys rV-S , � ,�anr� �--1 �! Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: r� Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:�.��
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Integrator:
loor
Certification Number: /L'� /
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop, Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Non -La er I I El
ury Pouury
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Daia Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
5
❑ Yes allo ❑ NA . ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? CD Yes � No ❑ NA NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

" Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes m No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): ^.7 ,1`'Z
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
®No
[DNA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
C2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
JKNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN [] PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ep'114 1l�r/w'la4
a/ JV a
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Ycs Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes [n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ®' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes fallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [!FAIo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis [] Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [3 Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E2No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [] Yes �o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

` Facility Number: r jDate of Inspection: ;3J
S 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes SNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25, is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes (Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [] Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes C3—No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes [SNo ❑ NA [] NE
❑ Yes [F1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E5a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes [ No
❑ Yes _allo
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
k y. _ s. or any other comments
omments re er to ques an #) Explain#any;tYES answers an additionahrecotnmendation
Use C wings of fhellity," t6i'letter�ex lain ltuatlons..3,(useiadditional; ages;asinecessa � )' :.�« _„
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatui
Phone:
Date:
21412015
Page 3 of

I-G - A
(Type of Visit: QK' O p�nee Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ® Arrival Time: ; t? Departure Time: [ County: ��'� �- Region: r XV
Farm Name:-�Z¢��yf ��%`f/ �r�i^-' / "f P Owner Email:
Owner Name: % ,f1 y� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: %Cft Q-a/ ,70n 1--/ Title: ire `�"'� Phone:
Onsite Representative: �.�'rr�� Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: ©w
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
u �
Design Current
Swine Ca aei Po
V4'etAoul try
Layer
Design
Ca aci
p ty
Current
Po .
p
Cattle
Dairy Cowr':
Dcslgn Current
Ca acit' P0'`
P
111
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Nan -La er
Dr. P.oultr
DairyCalf
v,
Feeder to Finish
,3_S
Design Current::
Ca acl P,n
Dai Heifer`,
Farrow to Wean
Dry Cow
b
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Othe
Other
Turke s
ITurkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
Stream Impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
[:]Yes C23-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes [-]No
[:]Yes �No
❑ Yes ;O-No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

f
Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:__ (0:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [-]Yes M_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 32-
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes S No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed andlor managed through a
❑ Yes [�.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes & No
❑ NA
❑ NE
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
D Yes 5No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes 2!�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[] Yes a No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes JZ_No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
/Window /❑
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): D /
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ®. No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes EjNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
❑ Yes 21 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes EZ-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
0 Yes
C3,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
2 ,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard [:]Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall []Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[]Yes
"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
do
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facifi Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ®,No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes allo
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes SNo
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes 5�_No
Other lssues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss rcview/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[DNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes B No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes S-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes M No [DNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes E5No
[:]Yes 3 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Commedtsf(refe.r,{to question #) Explain any YES answers'and/or. any!additional;'recommendations or any other comments
l! 'c drawings'of.:facility to:beffer` explain sifuAtions.:(use,additional pages as necessary) ;;
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:"
Date:
21412014

Type of Visit: f�'Compliancc Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: tine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: u--- �� County: s,�.� P___ Region: �-0
Farm Name: �vYt r~ r► © Owner Email: /`�`'�
Owner Name: r I'D Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: _bak,--5/ Title: Ole4,Pit t-e'_ Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Certification Number: 17J-o t
Certification Number: y0 (' l
Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Deslgn Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er I
I
ai Calf
Feeder to Finish
airy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
1weRl.gn _0
Dt. P,ouIta acI l;o
I Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
I Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b, Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ED-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes E, No
❑ Yes E] No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: ZL - 7V Date of Inspection:
to -
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
SNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway'?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 73
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
rR.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'?
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
n No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
I I . Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes (2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): e-o" ►' 1-IV) �5�yf�y5
13. Soil Type(s): 7
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes E[ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑Yes PNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 2] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP []Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement7 if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑-No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0 No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakcrs on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes E "No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facilit Number: jDate of Ins edon:
�24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ®-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25, Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [:]Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 0 Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
❑ Yes � No [3 NA [3 NE
❑ Yes [E-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Ycs RINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes P,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ;allo
❑ Yes �jNo
[DNA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Phone: Z)-j f T3-3�
Date:
21412011

S
,S
ivision of Water Quality
Facility Number - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
I'ype of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (�outine O Complaint O Fallow -up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: r/ Arrival Time: ,p c7 Departure Time: County: S4Sd�—
Farm Name: /ys ,e V%— Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: m'z�/ 8�sr Title:
/11
Integrator: i� e���
Certification Number: j?,e�-O L Certification Number: &,OG I r
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: . fA-L- r
Back-up Operator: yA" . q
Location of Farm:
a
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Region: F�
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Pnultry Canacitv Pon.
La ers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Pouits
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Phone:
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop:
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non
-Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes Lg No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[-]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [] No
❑ Yes Eq No
❑ Yes FZ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA [] NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):~-
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes R] No D NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes t2jNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do -any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Eg No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [:]Yes V No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes DEI.No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C j) rv\.-
t,
13. Soil Type(s): IDS 1
hLot
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [R-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes P�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application`?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Renuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
M
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �o
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: y—!
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �Z No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes RrNo
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes g� No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes allo
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[] Yes .] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[] Yes EkNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 12-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes Eg No
❑ Yes M_No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments refer;to-question , - y
M ( #) Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations o y
. , � _ comments.
iviiilrawling'Es.'of facility, to:better explain situ.. utions,{use additionpl pales as necessary}, or other
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 3Uv
Date:
21412011

ivision of Water Quality �. G
Facility Number ®- 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ompliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Olioutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: /-17 Arrival Time: Departure Time: �'a County: $�V -- Region:
Farm Name: &ri3;; ! 7rQ- ply l_- Zty /'7 D Owner Email:
Owner Name: "y� d & r���h,ry - Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Auld/d -FD nV y Title: eqt! n eol"' Phone:
Onsite Representative: I G� Integrator:
Certified Operator: Irp.� Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Giits
Other
Other
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Non -Layer
Non -
Other
Poults
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: _
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Daia Cow
Dairy Calf
DaiEX Heifer
Dry Cow
,Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes JE No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
[:]Yes No
[:]Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

]Facility Number: Date of inspection: /—
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? []Yes No
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 12
Observed Freeboard (in): 3r
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes 5;�,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [jNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes S No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [2 . No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [i No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ®, No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E3-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Ay/`I'l �(,s!`! �► %lcy,�+a•*}
13. Soil Type(s): A493 f x/DA
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 2Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
J[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
54 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists [3 Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
1701 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
.R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

Facill Number: - Date of Inspection: 5 — /3
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [] Yes [S No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes allo
the appropriate box(cs) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 0 No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ,I No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
[DNA ❑NE
❑NA []NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Cg No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 21 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ELNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E,No
❑ Yes L&No
[—]Yes Dq-No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Commen&.(refee to 06stlon:#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use°dri wings of facility to better .explain .'situ ations (use additional pages as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412011

''Division of Water Quality
. Facility Number - ® 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation a�
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ( ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: tine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: -- L, Arrival Time: ` D'D Departure Time: County:, Region: P7D
Farm Name: 30n�e yf /'jj� ��'� " ! O Owner Email:
Owner Name: i la rw , Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: f. Title: p r-- Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Soars
Other
Other
Integrator:
OF
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
I HLayer
Non -La er
Design Current
Dry Pnultry Canneity Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkex Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non-Daity
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes .® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes U21 No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - I Date of Inspection: —f G—
F Waste Collection & Treatment
`4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes M-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): AZ7
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
CZ[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
b. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
0 Yes
Eg-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): �� ``,-v Y
13. Soil Type(s): Nd Al
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Mi No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [-]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E[No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ® No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [-]Yes ®-No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - a Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0 No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes allo
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes UNo
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
� -Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
MA
Leif Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes Cg No
❑ Yes El No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. -
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: /i ©s-7rp a
Date:
2/4/2011

Type of Visit: ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: G4outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ®Q Departure Time: County: ,�r�raas�,►-� Region: /�QD
Farm Name: I=V_1.f xrps' yDZ
Or
Owner Name: i to) 'A"
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Facility Contact: �> 8>'['e � Title: Phone:
On site Representative: __ �45r42_� Integrator: 'f �ZrSr'!%�
Certified Operator: VX11 Po( 1] h - y Certification Number: 7�'d
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design Currentp, t Design Cum ent.
Pop Capacity
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry Capacity Cattle Popov
Wean to Finish
Layer Dairy Cow
a.
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
"'
.: ;;�,
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Design Current
I}r P.oultr. C*a licit l;o P.
Layers
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
DEyCow
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Da'
Farrow to Finish
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Boars
Pullets
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
L
I Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes � No
❑NA [3 NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

F'acili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
2!3,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
®' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[] Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[}�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
®,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
t8. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
U.-ill No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ER No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ZjNo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes E ,No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2011 Continued

Facifi Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ®,No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ® No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �&No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ®' No
Other Issues
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes r�:71 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (Le., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes jEf No ❑ NA ❑ NE
OApplication Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes Ej�_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes E2—No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments. (refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any. additional recommendations..or any other comments:.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Reviewer/inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:!/ f- 13l I
21412011

Facility Number
(rDivision of Water Quality 0f -"f
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
I Type of Visit 9�Z'tlne
'ance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Count Region:
D
Date of Visit: � Arrival Time: � � Departure Time: ; y: Ia�
Farm Name: J f'D.�(, HO4.- ���- �"` i � Owner Email:
Owner Name: Z" e ✓?7l tt Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: /�G!/%1e°�� Phone No:
Onsite Representative: ,ice-t-ti.� Integrator:L;Sf%Q�.-+�
Certified Operator: 12E=&� Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ❑ Q = 4 = Longitude: = o = 6 =
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La cr
❑ Non -Layer
❑
Wean to Finish
❑
Wean to Feeder
ER-IFeeder
to Finish
71 0
QD
❑
Farrow to Wean
❑
Farrow to Feeder
❑
Farrow to Finish
❑
Gilts
❑
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: a:]
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 9jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
J,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Yes
�dNo
❑NA
❑NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection'
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
ElYes
DNNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in); 37
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
&No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
�allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
C No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
C,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
S-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu,
Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[%No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
0-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
+1
Reviewer/Inspector Name; a } , ;,`W.
r ;�7� s �„
Phone: DQ
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: Wit_= �f D
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 7
k
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes '9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes fZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists El Design ❑Maps [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 5?�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment'? ❑ Yes IgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
IS No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit'?
❑ Yes
BNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[M-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
nNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
21 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
B No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

effivislon of Water Quality -�
Facility Number _ /� O Division of Sol] and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit �mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit utine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: �5 - County: Region: rJrV
104,
Farm Name: 1e0_: 10-V , h� Dom= fa -r14 /_/ a Owner Email:
`6*1
Owner Name:''4,2" I� ��f'tY Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: j L Title:
Onsite Representative: Certified Operator:
Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Phone No:
Integrator: 6321-,4 =0r
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification
Number:
�='="
o
Latitude: Longitude: etude: o
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer I EE11
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
_❑ Other
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:E 11
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge'?
❑ Yes C3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑NA
❑NE
❑Yes
❑No
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

`y Facility Number: &Z7 /,fi
Date of Inspection L. �
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Stnicture 2 Stricture 3 Structure .1
Structure.
i Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
5K No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
ERNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
J.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
U-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu,
Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl [:]Application Outside'of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CA WMP?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
t,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination,
❑ Yes
U.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
19. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
'.Comments (refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
,Use driwings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary);
Reviewer/Inspector Name r Phone: IJ/ / �yL'-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 2��

w Facility Number: hate of Inspection
ltequired Records & Documents
I9. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
[]Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
[XNo
❑ NA -
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
[&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
5LNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
UNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
PRrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
01her Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
Eallo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
JKNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
5�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/[nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
kNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

I
Type of Visit CH56mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 1.Z11 d Departure Time: 211 County'
Farm Name: XopagnV S �fl1j . �"fl2 ra-InC ��'I D Owner Email:
Owner Name: /; t G%%ar o^a1 /lr -3_Qt2 Y Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Region:
Facility Contact: e �L.,� 0-7 --`7 Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
.01
Certified Operator: _ S�ti.�a— Operator Certification Number: /2404.%
Back-up Operator: _
Location of Farm:
Swine
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
o
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Longitude: = o = 4 =
it
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Da Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures: 711
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
1
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Callo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
'® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: —I so, Date of Inspection
_+ Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): �9
Observed Freeboard (in):1 _
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which arc not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes t,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes jffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? M Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adcquatc markers as required by the permit'? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any pan of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes P!�Nlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes K[No ❑ NA ❑ NF
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application'? If yes. check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 1bs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable CTp Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
Xi
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
Vg-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
®. No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
tgNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes
5�[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #}: Explain any YES answers and/orany recommendations or any other comments.
Use.dra►rings of facility to better explain situations (use addrttonal:pages;as necessary):
Reviewerl[nspector Name
Z-viewerllnspector
�57L+�!,�_ at�`��'�`
Phone:
Signature:
Date:
rage 4 uj.3 IZIZ61u4 c.onnneretr

Facility Humber: — Date of Inspection W__AK
h
") Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes BNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. []Yes IRNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge'?
❑ Yes
DRNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment'?
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit`?
❑ Yes
CKNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
04 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30,
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern'?
❑ Yes
[9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
19 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit'? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
0KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Division of Water Quality S 7 0 0--
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Q5<_ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0<0utine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: i d'd 1 Departure Time: © County: Region:
Farm Name: -,P)xg,0/5 i ms. H0%. /!;Z& 1--to D __ Owner Email:
Owner Name:'- • e )e Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: ))
Facility Contact: ZCA&,0-! r.e Title:
T'
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: %.-&
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Feeder
U Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: ❑ o ❑ { ❑ Longitude: 0 e 01
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
4T ❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation`?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dai Calf
❑
Dairy Ileifei
❑
My Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cowl
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures: ED
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ N E
❑Yes ❑No El NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
19 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
fallo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
<� Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes tZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): yz—
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes EY No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes 01 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? JR Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Callo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13.
Soil type(s)
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
E:No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
[4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
JRNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
C&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
IComments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. I
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
' � a.Q.2 L+ �J_7-7 R A
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: qlf-9_y�f}-3_3a0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: --- Oa

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection14-1
D`c7
ReQuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? []Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ®.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ W"UP ❑ Checklists
Cl
Design El Maps [I Other
21, Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes Rrya ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
[NNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
1201 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
D9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28,
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
IgNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
1� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
RkNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
PLNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a foilow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

iz
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: l7 County: 11" Region:
Farm Name: ;� 5 CQST 0,9-- % / D Owner Email:
Owner Name:J2U_LrlJh.01 --- _ _-- �S_oI't -_- /Phone,,}}: ,,
Mailing Address: SG3S L ranY , s ✓+ll,e �' CLi�Te,,_ AI
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: gial 0 r1 =;2*_ Title:
Onsite Representative:.
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o ❑ I = 11
Longitude: = ° = 6 =
ti
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine C*apacity Population
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
1
❑ Layer
❑Dai Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
1 10 Non -Layer
❑Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
I
El Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
pry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑Non -La Non -Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
10 Beef Brood Cowl
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
EA No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
[W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
❑ Yes
( No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
O•No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
12128104
Continued

07
Facility Number: — I e Date of Inspection6491-1— L
Waste Collection & Treatment
ti 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
14 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
4Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
JZINo
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
14 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NI?
maintenance/improvement`?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
DkNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydrauiic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu,
Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifi ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s) D &! D A
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination':
❑ Yes
9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
LK No
❑ NA
❑ NE
ReviewerllnspectorNome
.'Y f Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: & — 00
12128104 Continued

` Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
' 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? []Yes K No ❑ NA ❑ NF
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes EgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design
g El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 9-Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
.Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
EN No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
QNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
4No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26,
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
JZ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
RfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
21No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ryes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
PqNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iet discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
g) No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33,
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
G-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
apd/Dr:I)raWin S + , ' r K' A c
a
�. ! f r-; , a ' .= 3 �� � .7 6" r s j $`f � 4 -. � A .�r.i
Additional Cottiments qn _ ,� r � � s
- 4, . fF•; sa ct.x.e 0.rtR,t'c`�I S'r.���,�a'x,s
0 , �r� rc=du '�-P,40 t1� �r ;�Q rl-: r L ; Z-r-a-yL all /'1-)'-U it n. IVflAr-
UV u P .
12128104

f
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 4bRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: $ /S Departure Time: County: Region: _F
Farm Name: Owner Owner N mail:
51c
Owner Name: �
�l�r�,e.e—� - - _ ! hone:IQ
Mailing Address: _,_4r� �� a,,gx�e �f--�•,, lAt 4,9.—CL����r f�Le' �P3.2,P
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: —Ac
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
' Swine
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
'7 42>
SI
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Phone No:
Integrator: /re 44QL
Operator Certification Number: _/ 7 C
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 0=, 0 Longitude: = o= 6
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ ke s
❑ ke Poults
E
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current I
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf'
❑
Dairy Heifei
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: FLI,'
b, Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge'?
❑ Yes (M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
El Yes
DMNo
El NA
❑NE
12128104 Continued

acility`Plumber: V.1 — /,f
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure l-� Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: './
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): l 3 1 1y
Observed Freeboard (in): `�26
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes [g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Qfl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [)9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12, Crop type(s) SD9 .. �. r� w �,/.� •.� b.h1 — 0 3 Gale_"
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes R3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination,[] Yes
U No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
GZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
NJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
{ Reviewer/Inspector Name a., r .% aw. `= b, Phone: I
IReviewer/inspector Signature de —A Date: (,^
12128104 Continued

FaciligWumber: f?a — JSr I Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes .VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes EXNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below./ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking % Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
(Y No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit'?
❑ Yes
'W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
CZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
(9 No
❑ NA
[I NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Z] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 L
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
[50 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit`? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[% No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
P1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
A[Idlt�OnA1EC0[IllnentS;anfllOr.D1 AW�f1gSL r3(4,
'off j - r. 13a ���.� �a;� c�Q t� avt� Gv-c �o y i e0A r
r GLa+ V, 11A.F oA-
}e e_k C_ s Ley
12128104

is
jType of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason far Visit • Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
Q Not O erational O Below Threshold
M lPermitted ©-Certified © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...................
Farm Name: .......... .......... l.A.A ................. ...... Q on�.F...roi.. tya„Fa�+�l-f D County: ..Fc^�PteS?�... ..... .............. �/? 0.......•
Owner Name: y�,!.�gp Phone No: �� �, ; S 5 Sv 1.
MailingAddress: t.Y<<,t:...... ........C. :a 9. 2...... L.........ZA 3.g.................................................. ..........................
Facility Contact: ...... at..t&ea"...... J&.de)X........... ..... Title: ................................................................ Phone No: !/v.... s.` �r :.8.�%�(g......
Onsite Representative; .... t!s!.4YxtQ Qp 1..3r..................................... Integrator: „p��s g�...........................................
Certified Operator: ................. .......................................... Operator Certification Number: ................. ............... ..........
Location of Farm:
M.441ne ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 Longitude • 4 0«
Swine Ca acr €:Po
ulation';
❑ Wean to Feeder
M-Freeder to Finish
S o
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
jr = i i Design Current - Design Current
�1try �H t It i!!.Ca 8C1 Po' 'ulatian • Cattle %A 8e1 i'P ulatlon;
.'
Layer I❑ Dairy
Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
! I
inr-'.}i'�allh'ho�
Other
Total'SSLW
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ONo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [9-IN-0
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 3-140
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [}-Ko
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes MW6
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes M-Mo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes Koo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ........................................... ....... ............ ............... ....... ........ .......................... ......................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
r�-
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: g 3 —
Date of Inspection / o`
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes 10
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes E No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes �To
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes L3 No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EYI o
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type _�S6Gan , l r"Ja4lAl
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management PIan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes B-No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes S-No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes U-No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes &No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 311�0
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 13-140
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes [moo
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes S-Pdo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes [4No
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Final Notes
I cr �!; f�-.7 a-r 1. `�[ I 1 i^"I 1 p § r! Y^rN 7t;•.[ [ �iA! F t. , r'(r �! EEY i a 3 t,. i c 7
..x
Reviewer/Ins EE
ector Name p '�!'larl!_.rC�ran7���.[U#._t:m
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: y%7o A Date: y
12112103 Continued

• Facility Number: �Z — Date of Inspection
Required
Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
SNo
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ W checklists, des�gnmatc.)
❑Yes1"0
23.
Does record keeping need* proveme�/nt? If yes, check the appprr priate box below.
atioi ❑ Waste Applicf ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysif ❑ Soil Sampling
El Yes
0'No
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
B- 0
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
Q No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
[2-go
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
B- o
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
C314O
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
[]-Ko-
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
es
❑ No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
[�o
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
El -No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
91 o
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
0N-o
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[}-N
❑ Stocking Form--O Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfalr-�E] Inspection After I" Rairr,
❑ 120 Minute Inspections-'[--] Annual Certification Forme
Q
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You wiR receive no further correspondence about this visit.
4f�P3 �e�n,'nolp.� r, 6017&X
LGCere And aFIOr S OAVle o/ e'
'��a� Wu3�e p+1w/y5.'s 4�� c�ootf +�'or GO,/ay5
wiry
7Ae rr &am** tl 4�P1 �a7 'eh �vt n�S
�h Joa3 �Neve�,�i� -In c begs ei •rary} s�arw,e f�a� ��ie, wt1>/e swn,,./a wRs- aJ ee.�/e,
- 1A.N' 4 a '/a" 6 /J.
Re e 0 r-A ti ne
c raiP ; by Segs a,,,
we/1 keel,
FOrti,
12112103

f
State of North Carolina T -IMM
Department of Environment,- N IVA
Health and Natural Resources • FA
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor � � H N F�
Jonathan S. Howes, Secretary
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
November 21, 1994
Boney Brothers Farms
Route 6, Box 231
Clinton, NC 28328
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Sampson County
Dear Kr. Roney:
On November 17, 1994, an inspection of your animal operation was
performed by the Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). Please find enclosed a
copy of our Compliance Inspection Report for your information. It is the
opinion of this office that this facility is in compliance with 15A NCAC 2H,
Part .0217, and that Animal Waste Management is being properly performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
"'4- g��l
Grady obson
Environmental Engineer
Enclosure
cc: Facility Compliance Group
Glenn Clifton
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayettevlile, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone 91 D-486.1541 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer W% recycled/ 10% past -consumer paper

i
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTRENT OF wintamaxT, HEALTH & NATaRAL RSSOORCES
DIVISION OF vMROIDUMAL MANAG PIM
Fayetteville Regional office
Animal operation Compliance Inspection Form
All questions answered negatively will be discussed in sufficient detail in
the Comments Section to enable the deemed Permittee to perform the appropriate
corrections:
SE=0M I
Animal Operation 2=:
Horses, cattle, swine, poultry, or sheep
SECTIgn XI
1. Does the number and type of animal meet or exceed
the (.0217) criteria? (Cattle (100 head),
horses (75), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and
poultry (30,000 birds with liquid waste
system))
2. Doe$ this facility meet criteria for
Animal Operation REGISTRATION?
3. Are animals confined fed or maintained
in this facility for a 12-month period?
4. Does this facility have a
ASTE
S. Does this facility maintain waste management
records (Volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with
specific cover crop)?
B. Does this facility meet the SCS minimum
setback criteria for neighboring houses,
wells, etc?

Zield site n
1. Is animal waste stockpiled or lagoon
construction within 100 ft. of a USGS
Map Blue Line Stream?
Z. Is animal waste land applied or spray
irrigated within 25 ft. of a USGS Map
Blue Line Stream?
3. Does this facility have adequate acreage
on which to apply the waste?
4. Does the land application site have a
cover crop in accordance with the
=11MCMM 96M
5. Is animal waste discharged into waters of
the state by man-made ditch, flushing system,
- .-or other similar man-made devices? - -
6. Does the animal waste management at this
farm adhere to Best Management Practices
(BMP) of the approved CERTIFICATION?
7. Does animal waste lagoon have sufficient
freeboard? How much? (Approximately 6 ft,�)
6. Is the general condition of this CAFO facility,
including management and operation,
satisfactory?
This is a very organized facility. It is well managed and maintained. This
facility was well planned and will efficiently utilize all generated nutrients
generated from the swine waste. This facility is very impressive.

� \ ♦ -
_y �, ryti�._._7._
it �� _,
'�} _ .
� :., 7,,

Grandfathering Explanation of Crops and Nitrogen Rates
The original plan in 1992 called for a 325 lb. nitrogen rate
for controlled grazing. The portion of bermudagrass included in
this plan will use this base nitrogen rate along with a rye
overseed equivalent to 50 lbs. nitrogen per acre. Typically NRCS
shows 50 lbs. of nitrogen per acre for the overseeded rye;
however, since a rye overseed suppresses Bermuda yield slightly,
a reduction of nitrogen will be shown on the Bermuda with the
deficit added back to the rye. This will more accurately reflect
the actual yield of both the bermuda and the rye. The bermuda
nitrogen rate will be 295 lbs./acre and the rye rate will be
80 lbs./acre.
This producer has access to leased land adjoining his
property. Rather than adding additional bermuda at an
environmentally questionable nitrogen rate called for in the
original plan, he will use realistic yield on the leased land.

V. Field Data Sheets:
The field data sheets include a variety of significant
information useful for managing each particular field. EDYIT
ronmental Hazards or Concerns, Field Leaching Potential,
Highly Erodible Land, and Plant Available_ Nitrogen Required
(lbs./ac.) by the crop are significant. Note that the
nitrogen required by the crop is indicated here and on the
Field Summ-acry_ Sheet in Section III of the Waste Utilization
Plan.

Field ID
Soil Series Lid-/.3
Environmental Hazards or Concerns
13 sinkholes
la surface water
Field Data Sheet
Total Crop Acres -/ 7
Is field classed as HEL?
❑ No
❑ Yes
Field leaching potential — ❑ Low
Acres Useable for
Blosolid Application �-
Application Equipment
❑ Broadcast
El Banded Applications
❑ High ❑ Starter Fertilizer Rig
❑ Manure Spreader
Nutrient Sources
irrigation Equipment
❑
Injection
❑
Commercial Fertilizer'
❑
None
o
Fertigation
❑
Animal Manures
❑
Traveller
❑
Sewage Sludge
❑
Portable
Tillage System
❑
Septage
❑
Center Pivot
0
Conventional
❑
Other By -Product
❑
Solid Set
❑
Reduced Till
❑
Lateral Move
❑
No -Till
Crops
Previous Crop 'arc
Predicted Crop Rotation Sequence
N Residue Credit
(if double -cropped. list spying f
Realistic Yieid(s) Expected Plant Available Required
from Previous Crop
;romp &ZOLe-)
Year 1 aF'�7�.�p.1 .f
J:Z .AtpF.IrArE,rdiJ
Year (2) -•
��
-�
Year (3) ,•
•�
Soil Test Results:
Date of Soil Sampling
Soil Class: 13 Mineral 13 Mineral/Organic
[] Organic
pH CEC P-I
K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn-I
Zn-I Cu-1 ,
Nutrient Recommendations:
Lime: N: S$ge Above . P205:
K20: Mg: S:
Mn:
Zn: Cu: _
If using only commercial fertilizer, go to section 6.
A
r

Field Data Sheet
­7_7a 07'�e
Field ID e2— _ Total Crop Acres � 3 Acres Useable for
Blosolid Application 3 • a
Soil Series _��3 6w 4evift
Environmental Hazards or Concerns Is field classed as HEL? Application Equipment
❑ sinkholes ❑ No ❑ Broadcast
13 surface water ❑ Yes ❑ Banded Applications
❑ Field leaching potential — ❑ Low o High ❑ Starter Fertilizer Rig
❑ Manure Spreader
Nutrient Sources
Irrigation Equipment
©
Injection
Commercial Fertilizer!
❑
None
❑
Fertigation
1 Animal Manures
❑
Traveller
❑ Sewage Sludge
o
Portable
Tillage System
o Septage
❑
Center Pivot
❑
Conventional
❑ Other By -Product
❑
Solid Set
❑
Reduced Till
❑
Lateral Move
❑
No -Till
Crops
Previous Crop: &4ee< K
Predicted Crop Rotation Sequence
(if double -cropped, list spring crop first)
Year (1) 43EX-,—z 4 /,�pr=& ( .�wz E )
Year (2) Ole
Year (3)
Soil Test Results:
Date of Soil Sampling
pH CEC P-I
Realistic Yields) Expected Plant Availa le N Required
Soil Class: ❑ Mineral 13 Mineral/Organic ❑ Organic
K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I
N Residue Credit
from Previous Crop
Zn-I Cu-I
Nutrient Recommendations:
Lime: N: See Above _ P205: K20: Mg: S: Mn: Zn: Cu:
If using only commercial fertilizer, go to section 6.
A
j

70 -',V
Field ID 3
Soil Series
Environmental Hazards or Concerns
0 sink holes
❑ surface water
Field Data Sheet
Total Crop Acres S . "J /
Acres Useable for
Blosolid Application.
Application Equipment
0 Broadcast
0 Banded Applications
Field teaching potential — ❑ Low o High C] Starter Fertilizer Rig
Is field classed as HEL?
❑ No
0 Yes
❑ Manure Spreader
Nutrient Sources
Irrigation Equipment
❑ injection
0 Commercial Fertilizer'
❑
None
13 Fertigation
0 Animal Manures
17
Traveller
13 Sewage Sludge
❑
Portable
Tillage System
o Septage
❑
Center Pivot
17 Conventional
17 Other By -Product
❑
Solid Set
❑ Reduced Till
❑
Lateral Move
0 No -Till
Crops
Previous Crop A 2
Predicted Crop Rotation Sequence
N Residue Credit
(if double -cropped, list spring crop first
Realistic Yleld(s) Expected Plant AvallaF�i N Required from Previous Crop
Year (1) -RFA7-.p.o/.�� � G�.at=
.e..�.��.i�/1are�J
_
.2 f F0 /If
Year (2) •• �
••
•,
Year (3) �'
•.
Soil Test Results:
Date of Soil Sampling
Soil Class:
0 Mineral 13
Mineral/Organic E3 Organic
pH CEC P-1
K-I
Ca%
Mg% Mn-I Zn-I Cu-1
Nutrient Recommendations:
Lime: N: See Above . P205: K20: Mg: S: Mn: Zn: Cn:
if using only commcrcial fertilizer, go to section 6.
A
J

Field Data Sheet
.V � i .�•s cT
Field ID ir/��c y C/E�.r ErJ/ Total Crop Acres '
Soil Series 1
Environmental Hazards or Concerns Is field classed as HEL?
17 sink holes ❑ . No
11 surface water 11 Yes
❑ Field leaching potential — ❑ Low
Acres Useable for
Biosolld Application Lam-
Application Equipment
❑ Broadcast
❑ Banded Applications
❑ High ❑ Starter Fertilizer Rig
❑ Manure Spreader
Nutrient Sources
Irrigation Equipment
❑
Injection
11
Commercial Fertilizer'
❑
None
❑
Fertigation
❑
Animal Manures
❑
Traveller
0
Sewage Sludge
o
Portable
Tillage System
13
Septage
o
Center Pivot
❑
Conventional
❑
Other By -Product
o
Solid Set
❑
Reduced Till
❑
Lateral Move
❑
No -Till.
Crops
Previous Crop : 2jE,ZU.� 4
Predicted Crop Rotation Sequence
N Residue Credit
(if double -cropped, list spring crop firs
�x�:t�
Realistic Yield(s) Expected Plant Available N Required
from Previous Crop
Year (1) a¢,tr.--4•f .t __r"
C�-►...�„ f�..°SE ei
oZ /-4s4c.
Year (2)
2 y, s f-v ,. 1.
Year (3) �. "" "`
..,_ Z 5 sZs-e.7
Soil Test Results:
Date of Soil Sampling
Soil Class: U Mineral 13
Mineral/Organic ❑ Organic
pH CEC P-I
K-I Ca%
Mg% Mn-I
Zn-I Cn-I _
Nutrient Recommendations:
Lime: N: See Above . P205:
K20: Mg:
S: Mn:
Zn: Cu: _
If using only commercial fertilizer, go to section 6.
A

Field Data Sheet
--z1 Jr- 2-d�-
Field ID _
Total Crop Acres o 9
Acres Useable for
Soil Series _ �� B�w.�T �-)
Biosoiid Application `� a
.
Environmental Hazards or Concerns
Is field classed as HEL?
Application Equipment
❑ sinkholes
❑ No
❑ Broadcast
❑ surface water
❑ Yes
❑ Banded Applications
❑
Field leaching potential --- o Low
❑ High ❑ Starter Fertilizer Rig
❑ Manure Spreader
Nutrient Sources
Irrigation Equipment
❑ Injection
❑ Commercial Fertilizer'
❑ None
❑ Fertigation
❑ Animal Manures
❑ Traveller
© Sewage Sludge
❑ Portable
Tillage System
13 Septage
❑ Center Pivot
❑ Conventional
❑ Other By -Product
❑ Solid Set
❑ Reduced Till
❑ Lateral Move
❑ No -Till
Crops
Previous Crop
Predicted Crop Rotation Sequence N Residue Credit
(if double -cropped, list spring crop first) Realistic Yle d(s) Expected Plant Available N Required from Previous Crop
Year (1 ) 7sr.'i/E T/•Qyr'_�G.¢-��� .? . 3 i /_ -r-i /. 3 o / ,Fc) /6s /,tc .
Year (2) C' a.w f 2�� �G.c•�aF 7-r- h L -,' i � _ G a /6s 1 .
Year (3) 7-,t e i / �. r �: _ 13a ga ,14" _./..� .
Soil Test Results:
Date of Soil Sampling Soil Class: ❑ Mineral 13 Mineral/Organic ❑ Organic
pH CEC P-1 K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Zn-I Cu-I
Nutrient Recommendations:
Lime: N: SCe Above . P205: K20: Mg: S: Mn: Zn: Cu:
If using only commercial fertilizer, go to section 6.
A

-7-7o
Field ID._ /
Soli Series Al, 4 .v,. 4 /,k) ,
Environmental Hazards or Concerns
❑ sink holes
❑ surface water
Field Data Sheet
Total Crop Acres ?. ,P`7 _
Acres Useable for
Blosolld Application_ �!
Application Equipment
❑ Bioadcast
❑ Banded Applications
Field leaching potential — 0 Low 0 High ❑ Starter Fertilizer Rig
Is field classed as HEL?
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑
Manure Spreader
Nutrient Sources
Irrigation
Equipment
0
Injection
❑
Commercial Fertilizer`
❑
None
❑
Fertigation
❑
Animal Manures
❑
Traveller
❑
Sewage Sludge
❑
Portable
Tillage System
❑
Septage
❑
Center Pivot
❑
Conventional
❑
Other By -Product
❑
Solid Set
❑
Reduced Till
❑
Lateral Move
❑
No -Till
Crops
Previous Crop &-J Cad
Predicted Crop Rotation Sequence N Residue Credit
(if double -cropped, list spring crop first) Realistic Yleld(s) Expected Plant Available N Required from Previous Crop
Year (l) CoX-,f Ae(,cr C6,tgteJ // 0 6c.. 1.3 i 13 7 / ,F-o /dl.Zsc . _
Year (2) --w. ii— r 1A:,, g _�G.t..z�1 �?, 7 7- f _ /- 4 � / S o / / - ��/.K .
Year (3) Zp!,er- �11-3 i 3 7 /_1--e" /As./'c_ __—
Soil Test Results:
Date of Soil Sampling Soil Class: ❑ Mineral ❑ Mineral/Organic 0 Organic
pH CEC P-1 K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Zn-1
Cu-I
Nutrient Recommendations:
Lime: N: SgCghoy; . P205: K20: Mg: S: Mn: Zn: Cu:
If using only commercial fertilizer, go to section 6.
s.
1

.___WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN.
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach sur!ace waters of the state
by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application,
or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any.discharge of waste which reaches surface water is
prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject to the
assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the
Division of Environmental. Management for every day the
discharge continues.
V
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design
folder that the producer either owns or has long tern
access to adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of waste, he shall provide MRCS with a
copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a
landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing
him/her the ugte of the land for waste application for the
life expectancy of.the production facility. -It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an
update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a
change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields base soil
type, available moisture, historical data, climate
conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of application for
other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource
Management System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation
System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate
Filter strips will be used where runoff leaves the field.
These filter strips will'be in addit-on to "Buffers"
required by DEM(See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips
and Standard 396 (Interi3) - Riparian Forest Buffers. I'
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking
after waste application. Waste shou.d not be applied when
the wind is blowing.
G. When animal waste is to be applied cn acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally
tilled cropland. When applied to ccnse=-vation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided
the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weacher and Climarz in Norzh Carolina" in
the Technical Reference - Fnvironme: file for guidance.)

vrTAC10tE:,'T "a"
WASTE UTILIZATION= -PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(eond»uaa)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the
soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur
offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No
pondiyig should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of
application..
B. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils,
during rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in
such a manner that no more than 20 to 25 percent of the
leaf area is covered,
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on:'soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils
should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover
crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be aMe
ied more than 30 days prior to planting of the
crop on soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to
surface water. This distance may be reduced for waters
that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter
strips are present. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other
property and public right-of-ways.
IS. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways or wetlands by a discharge or by over -
spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided they have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical. specialist". Animal
waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that
discharge directly into water courses, and only then at
agronomic rates provided the application causes no runoff
or drift from the site.
8

STEUTILIZATION PLI-"- AN......
_
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(eoncinueal
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged
into the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures
must maintain a maximum operating level to provide
adequate storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in
addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments,
berms, pipe runs, etc.). it needed, special vegetation
shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited
to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas
should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and
structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure -plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and
erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc.,
should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent
breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
7

Important Considerations
when Managing Nutrients to Protect Water Quality
Animal Manures & By -Products
Do: ■ Remember that the producer is responsible for any pollution caused by improper management of
nutrients.
■ To avoid runoff, apply irrigated or liquid materials at levels less than the infiltration rate of the
soil. Infiltration rates vary with the degree of soil saturation and should be taken into account
when applying nutrients from liquid sources.
■ To avoid groundwater contamination, apply no more liquid than the amount necessary to fill the
soil profile within the crop rooting depth to field capacity.
■ To properly design and implement a nutrient management system, have manure and by-products
analyzed. If a sample cannot be taken before land application use the best available information
for that material. Then during land application or loading, take a representative sample of the
material and have it analyzed. After results are received, reassess the nutrient management plan
and make any necessary changes.
■ To maximize nutrient uptake for plant growth and development and to reduce the potential for
pollution, apply nitrogen from fertilizers or by-products less than 30 days before planting.
■ Develop field borders, which serve as a nutrient trap if field runoff occurs.
■ Tf a by-product has a calcium carbonate equivalent, be sure to assess the Iime effect at calculated
application rates for the primary nutrient. Many products with calcium carbonate need to be
treated as a primary lime source rather than a primary nutrient source.
■ Store nutrient or lime sources that can't be applied at the appropriate time for plant use properly
to prevent groundwater or surface water contamination.
■ Locate temporary and permanent storage structures a minimum of 100 feet from perennial waters
as indicated on the most recent version of U.S.G.S. 1:2400 (7.5 minute) scale maps.
Don't: ■ Don't apply manure or by-products at rates greater than agronomic rates.
■ Don't spread manure or by-products on soils designated as highly erodible (HEL) unless treated to
meet soil loss or "T" (value that is considered to be an acceptable field loss tons/ac/yr), or unless
the application is part of a treatment program such as soil amendment.
■ Don't apply manures and by-products on soils with high runoff potential or steep slopes.
■ Don't apply nutrients to soils that are water saturated, frozen or snow covered. These conditions
promote runoff and may contribute to surface water contamination.
■ Don't apply nutrients before a storm. Greatest nutrient runoff occurs when significant rain falls
within 24 hours after application.
■ Don't apply nutrients near surface waters o: wells.

Material Handling & Best Management Practices
for Swine Manure & Wastewater
Collection: ❑
pit recharge
❑
hand wash/hand scrape
❑
flush
❑
mechanical scrape
❑
exhaust air plenum
❑
tractor scrape
❑
lift station
❑
other
❑
other
❑
other
Storage: ❑
manure underfloor pit
❑
retention pond
❑
manure aboveground tank
❑
lagoon temporary storage
❑
manure earthen basin
❑
lagoon sludge storage
❑
compost shed
Cl
mortality container for rendering Ebiogas
storage tank
pickup
❑
other
❑
other
Treatment: ❑
biological additive
❑
solids composting
❑
solids separation
❑
sludge drying
❑
anaerobic lagoon
❑
lot rotation
❑
lagoon cover
❑
stream fencing
❑
anaerobic digester
❑
riparian filter
❑
mechanically aerated lagoon
❑
mortality composting
❑
aeration cell
❑
mortality pit disposal
❑
constructed wetland
❑
mortality burial
❑
exhaust air biofiltration
❑
mortality incineration
❑
other
❑
other
Use: ❑
fertilizer (field crops, pasture/hay, turfgrass,
trees)
❑
biogas fuel (space heat, water heating, cogeneration)
❑
organic compost (lawn, garden, horticulture, landscaping)
❑
animal by --product feedstuff
❑
other
❑
other
Application Equipment:
❑ tractor scraper ❑ manure spreader
❑ irrigation pump
❑ mechanical
scraper ❑ compost turner
❑ irrigation dry hydrant
❑ front-end loader
❑ biogas hot-water
boiler ❑ irrigation (permanent,
❑ mechanical
solids separator ❑ biogas cogenerator
solid -set, portable,
❑ flush pump
❑ biogas scrubber
traveller, center pivot,
❑ flush tank/valve/controller
❑ biogas coinpressor
lateral move)
❑ agitator/sludge pump 0 aerator/blower
❑ incinerator
❑ sludge/solids
dryer ❑ lift pump
❑ other
❑ other
❑ other
10-5
0

EMERGENCY ACTIONTLAN
PHONE IN'UMBERS j
DWQ 9/o - S/ G - 1.r,11 (AFtr.c A.. ,e ; 9, S _ 733
EMERGENCY INIA:VAGE:IVaN'T SYSTEyI 8 99 6
SWCD 5f x - 7f L 3
MRCS r.S9A- 7 14 3
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leal`ing.
overflowing, or running off site. You should -not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that cussed the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action. ' ,de:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. CIose valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems. houses. solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop Irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
Stop all in tite house. Liush systems.,r _oiid seasrators.

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Die a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage.
pui in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals. trap or remove animals and fail
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side wails and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Anv damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f.. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, tail your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office; Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-133-3942.
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number -
and local MRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
4: if none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damage.
a. Contractors Name: r.+l yes• C6nN �'
h. Contractors Address: 3 5L.en4 �* �� Ri-
c. Contractors Phone: 9-

6: Contact the technical specialist -who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting
Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: 2)X---, Y V77
b. Phone: , la - ,.. rI'z _ 2 16 I- ..
?, Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage. repair the system. and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening attain.

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
5unrce - Cause -- amIII$ to lllliniulize odor -- YT- � Silt Sprcific Nrarlirrs
Fal Im watl - - Swinr pn,ducliaus — — -U Vegetative or wooded bulkrs; -
Vfi
ecommended best management practices;
od judgment and common sense
Animal hU-ly surfaces • Noy manure -covered animals Ef Dry floors
1•14bur r.uel:uxs 0 Wet uumiale-covered floors [) . ued floors;
q
,'located over slatted floors;
. eders at high end of solid floors;
n Scrape manure buildup froul floors;
Ci jInderfloor ventilation for drying
Klantuc: collection pits Urine;
l'allial microbial decomposilion
Frequent manure removal Ivy flush, pit recharge,
or scrape;
n l Indef floor ventilation
^Vc 11il.atinu cXhaust lams 0 Volatilcgases; 11 maintenance;
Dust Fl l cient air Inovenrent
ludour sulfstes • Dust W Washdowu between groups of animals;
1 eeal additives;
n I Lefler carvers;
I7 Feud delivery downspout extcodus to feeder
covers
Husk wul.s
a Agitalion of recycled lagoon
❑
Flush lurk covers;
14111id %Ykife tanks are filling
❑
Extend fill lines to near buttunl ul'tanks Willi
_
anti -siphon vents
Flush alleys
• Agitalion during wastewaler
❑
l laderllonr flush with underfloor ventilation
conveyance
Pil 14:c11.11ge lulints
a Agitation of recycled lagoon
fa
I'Mend recharge lines In near bullonl of pits
liquid while pits are filling
with anti -siphon vents
Life stations
• Agitation during sump tank
rl
Su1up tank covers
fining and drawdown
Oosskk drain culluclitut
o Agitation during wastewater
1-1
1101 covers
of juuctioq Dozes
conveyance
ANIO ' - Hovcnlhcr 11. 1996, pate 3

T Source Cause Z UMI's to Minimize Odar Site Specific Practices
End of drainpipes at Agitation during wastewater Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance Vgoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emissions; W Proper lagoon liquid capacity; -
• Biological mixing; ❑ correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation - iuimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
LR" Minimum agitation when pumping;
CI Mechanical aeration;
❑ , oven biological additives
litigation sprinWer
0 1ligh pressure agitation;
(I Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
nozzles
a Wind drift
nnimum recommended operating pressure;
rptimp
intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑
Pump from second -stage lagoon
Sturage tank or basin
0 Parlial miicrobial decomposition;
11
Bottom or midlevel loading;
smNce
a Mixing whiie filling;
0
'bank covers;
• Agitation when emptying
Cl
Basin surface mats of solids;
n
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Seining basin surface
• Partial mi"obial decomposition;
Cl
Isxtend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
• Mixing while filling;
level;
• Agitation when emptying
C7
Remove settled solids regularly
Mmuuc, slurry or sludge
• Agitation when spreading;
❑
Soil injection of slurry/shidges;
spreader outlets
• Volatile gas emissions
L7
Wash residual manure from spreader after usc;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Ilneovrrcd manure,
a Volatile gas emissions while
Q
Soil injection of slnrry/sludges
slurry or sludge on fichl
drying
n
Soil incorporation within 48 lirs.;
stnfaees
❑
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying;
0/Proven
biological additives or oxidants
11cait in InIals • t-arcass deeornposinon M !'roper disposition of carcasses
!]Call animal disposal * Carcass decomposition Cl Complete covering of carcasses in lull ial pits;
pits ❑ Proper loeationlcmistruction ofdisposal pits
loeiueraims • Incomplete combustion Cl Secondary stack burners
AIVIOC - Noventher 11, 1996, Page 4

Son, a Cause UMPs to Minimize Odur _ Site Specific Practices
Standing water araiuul • Improper drainage; Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities 6 Microbial decnniposiiian of away from facilities
organic matter /
Ala,iurc trackcil onto • Poorly maintained access roads IM Farm access road maintenance
public roads hunt farm
access
Additional Information : Available Frain :
Swine Nlauure klanagenicnl ; 0300 Itulc/BMP Packet NCSI1, Cauuty l:xlension Center
Swine Production I-ann Potential Odor Sources and Iternedies ; EBAE? Fact Slicet NCSI1 - IIAI:
Swine Production Facility Manurr Management: Pit Recharge - Lagoon Treatment; E13AC 129-99 NCSI1 - RAH
Swine Prodi,ctiun Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment; ERAE 129-88 NCSI1 -IIAI:
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; E13AE 103-83 NCSI I - IIA F
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Cgoipnicnt ; EBAE I -act Slices NCSI1 - HAU
Controlling Odors front' Swinc Buildings; Pll I-33 NCSI I - Swinc Extension
Environmental Assurance Program ; NPPC Manual NC Purl: Producers Assoc
Options I'M Managing Odor, a report from the Swine Odor Task Force NCSIJ Agri Con»nunications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flits ; PRO107, 199S Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative I:xlcnsion
A&I()C - 11t)vci,il,cr 11. 1996. P.it;e 5

s
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Suurrc Cutts& - DMI's go Control Insects Site SperiGc !'radices
Liquid Systems -
hers • Acculntllatiou
Or Rush system is dcsigncd and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids front
utters as designed-
M Reglove bridging of accumulated solids it
Lagoons and His Cluslcd Solids Maittain lagoons, stooling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to eninimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 inches over more than 30% of surface.
lixcclaive vcl;clalive Decaying vegoalion Maintain vegetative control along hanks of — --- -
Growth lagoons and other impound){tents to prevelll
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
�I�I-IT. -�- - . Feed Spillage Design, operate duel utaiwain feed systems
Zlul kCrS and (ftlugll5) to n1i11i111EZC the
e innulalion of decaying wastage.
Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.t;., 7 - 10
day interval dorint; summer-, 1.5-36 day int.aval
(J"fIllg winter).
hcc[l Storage a Accumulalions of feed residues
AMIC - Nuviceidwr 11. 1996, Pagc I
I Reduce moisture accumulation within and
around inunediate perimeter of IcCo1 Slorat;U
areas by insuring drainage away Isom site
and/or providing adequalc conwinnrclu (e-g.,
cd ered bin for brewg er's rtin and similar hit;h
noisture grain preulucls).
Ulspeet liar and rduove or beak till accuuullated
solids in filler strips art►unld feel) sinral;c as
needed.

Source Cruse AMPS to Control lusecls Site Specific Practices
Animal I lolling Areas Accumulations of animal wastes ❑ Eliminate low area that trap moisture along
and feed wastage fences and other locations where waste
acetunulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
❑ Maintain fence rows and f lter strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
rentove or break tip accumulated solids as
needed).
Dry Manure I lsndling Accumulations of aniiuuil wastes C7 Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.. 7 - 14
Systeats Clay interval during summer; 1 S-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
f7 Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
M Inspect for and remove or break tip accunnulalcil
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
tnauurc handling areas as needed.
rar more inliinnation contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Mpartment of Entomology. Box 7613, North Carolina State l Iniversity,
Raleigh. NC, 27695-7613.
ANTIC- November 11. 1996, Page 2

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
.I Burial three feet beneath the surface of the eround. within 24 hours after
knowledse of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any bowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-163.7
Comoiete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Vete-inarian must be
attached)

IRRIGATION SYSTEM NESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name:
Address:
Telephone:
C,',-, ,— A/. C . 2 Y 2. _
v— 3S
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications'
County:
Date:
Field
Number
Approximate
Maximum
Useable size
of Field'
(acres)
Soil Type
Slope
{'/.)
Crop(s)
Maximum
Application
Rate+
(inlht)
Maximum
Application
per Irrigation
Cycles
(inches)
Comments
U i'
-
s
4/R aA ►•—
a .e �. 4 ,c.I s S ,[
iav
c o h, -w c✓t
Z
Q
w �►r�-
3
lv.q .ew
i
"
's 3dIre
Z—Ze
ems. .��
: //Er ,t c•.«
�a
'Table to be completed In its entirety by Field Office personnel and forwarded to the Irrigation system designer.
"See attached map provided by the Field Office for field location(s).
'Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
`Refer to N. C. Inigallon Guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section it G. Anntial applicalion must not exceed the agronomic rates for the boll and crop used.
Irrlgalinn ParamelCFS
October 1996
page-i
USDA -MRCS
North Carolina
!r

r~
{
"fable 2. Conilmison of average and instantaneous application rates !'for a gun nozzle with variable orifice openings.
(Prepared by James C. Barker).
Sprinkler Nelson Nelson Nelson Nelson Nelson Nelson Nelson
150T 150T 150T 150T 150T 150T 150T
Nozzle diameter, in
Nozzle pressure, psi
Nozzle flow, gpm
Wetted diameter, £t
Full wetted area, acres
360o arc
15o arc
Effective wetted area, acres
75% spacing: 360o arc
320o arc
15o arc
60% spacing: 360o arc
15o arc
Volumetric application, ac-in/hr
Average application rate, in/hr
one sprinkler only
two sprinklers @ 751 spacing 320o arc
two sprinklers @ 60% spacing 3600 arc
Instantaneous application rate, in/hr
one sprinkler only
two sprinklers @ 75% spacing 15o arc
two sprinklers @ 60% spacing 15o arc
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
128
165
210
260
315
380
445
290
310
335
355
375
395
410
1.52
1.73
2.02
2.27
2.54
2.81
3.03
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.11
0.12
0.13
1.09
1.24
1.45
1.63
1.82
2.01
2.17
0.97
1.10
1.29
1.45
1.F1
1.79
1.93
0.045
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.09
0.70
0.79
0.93
1.04
1.16
1.29
1.39
0.029
0.033
0.039
0.043
0.048
0.05
0.06
0.28
0.36
0.46
0.57
0.70
0.84
0.98
0.19
0.21
0.23
0.25
0.27
0.30
0.32
0.29
0.33
0.36
0.40
0.43
0.47
0.51
0.41
0.46
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.71
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.1
6.6
7.2
7.8
6.2
7.0
7.7
8.5
9.2
10.0
10.9
9.'$
11.0
12.0
13.2
14.4
15.6
17.0

Calculating Application Volume and Travel Time
For A Traveler
1. To calculate the travel speed it takes a traveler to apply a
certain application volume, use the formula below:
Travel speed (in/min)
19.26 X GP
Lane spacing (ft) x depth of application (in)
Example: Calculate the travel speed needed to apply one inch
of water using a 200 R Ring Nozzle @90 psi. with a
oriface opening of (1. 4 611) .
From Big Gun Table
GPM - 405
Dia. = 415'
First we must calculate the lane spacing for a traveler. This
is calculated at approximately 75% of the wetted diameter of
the gun.
Lane spacing = .75 x 415'
Lane spacing = 311.251 or approximately 3001
Travel speed (in/min) = 19._26_ x _405,
300` x 1"
Travel speed (in/min) = 7800
300
Travel speed (in/min) = 26 inches/minute
or 2.16 feet/minute
2. To calculate application volume if you know travel speed, use
the formula below:
Depth of application =
,26 X GPM
Lane spacing (ft) x Travel speed (in/min)
1f we use the travel speed above of 26 inches/minute and a lane
spacing of 300' and GPM - 405 then
Depth of application = 19.26 x 405
3001 x 26
Depth of application = 7800
7800 or III

Segye ce Sheet For Liquid Waste irrigation
1. Use soil sample report for nutrient recommendations and liming.
Ex m e: Recommended in lbs./ac.
* N 2ZO5 X20 z ram_ _ cu Lime
20-40 '22:0-248 0 $ .7 Ton
z. Use Waste Analysis Report for nutrient availability and rate.
Example: lbs. available/1.000 gallons (PA -- Plant Available)
N PL05 40,_ zn
2.5. 1.4 3.4 .02 .01
3. Calculate the amount of waste needed in gallons to supply a
certain nitrogen loading rate in lbs./acre.
Example: Calculate the gallons of waste needed to supply
40 lbs.. of nitrogen/acre from the waste analysis
in item # 2 above.
Gallons = lbs, Lijtgggen needed x 1000
lbs.-nitrogen/1000 gallons
Gallons = _40 x 1000
2.5
Gallons = 16,000
4. Convert the gallons of waste needed per acre into acre inches.
Example: Use answer from item # 3 -above. (Given: one acre inch `
.Equals 27,154 gallons)
Acre Inches = 16.000
27,154
Acre Inches = .59
* Nitrogen rate on soil report is a generic recommendation by crop
type. Suggested rate obtained from Waste Utilization Plan (WUP)
or technical specialist is dependent on crop type, soil type and
realistic yield expectation.

sprinkler flow rate, gpm = from manufactUrers data sheet based on sprinkler operating pressure and nozzle diameter
irrigation volume, gallons - no. of sprinklers operating x sprinkler flow rate, gpm x irrigation time, minx
irrigation area, acres = no. of sprinklers operating x sprinkler spacing width, ft x length, ft - 43560
liquid nutrients applied, lbs/ac = liquid nutrient analysis, Ibs/1000 gallons 1000 x irrigation volume, gallons
irrigation area, acres
% x 83.5 = Ibs/1000 gallons
ppm x .00835 = Ibs/ 1000 gallons
Ibs/1000 gallons x 27.154 = Ibs/acre-inch

BIG GUN° PERFORMANCE TABLES U.S. UNITS
100 SERIES BIG GUNS - 240 TRAJECTORY"
100 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
?NUzne
'iozzle
Nozzle Nozzle
Nozzle 1 Nozzle
Nozzle 'mule Noz: a
'Mzzle
.5.
.55..
6` + 35.
•5"
3"
'Y
9.
,0"
°S.I.
SP111
7IA
GPM
31A
GPM
-A 13PM
]IA
GP'.'
CIA I GPM
]'A
GPM
--!A I GPM
31A GPM
--IA
3PM 3;A
40
47
191'
57
202,
08
213' 79
222' 1
91
230' 1 103
240,
119
250' 134
256 152
202'
.,_ _� ..
50
50
205'
54
215'
74
225' 97
235'
00
245' 1 —5
256'
30
:SS' 150
: ' 165
290'
�44 300'
60 1
55
215' !
89
22r
1 61
24ir 1 98
250' 1
Ito
260' 1 126
VW 1 143
260' 1 164
288' 1 102
295'
1;.224 3161:
70
i0
225' 1
75
238,
Be
;50' 103
263'
120
275' 1136
283
155
295' '.77
202' .97
t,-
243 130' '
W I
64
235' 1
79
248'
1..94
260' 1 110
273' !
128
26a' 1146
295'
115E
305' I ,89
314' 1 210
325'
1 2Sa ,-1
x
38
245'
33
256'
100
't7
283'
!35
295' '55
106'
i75
2,5' [ 20t
125' 223
1.35'
27A ;62'
100
72
255' I
57
286'
r 106
7 260' 1 123
293, 1
.143
305' 1,.163 -
318'
1 185
325' 1 212
336' 1 235
346'
1 28Y-T--*372rw')
' 0
`5
255' -
92
2,a,
111
'-0' !29-
303'
'50
315'
324'
•95
335 i 222
344' 1 247
355'
30a 380, 1
' Ayaii018 only win F+00 8
S1100,
100 R RING NOZZLES _
100 ON DIFFUSER NOZZLES
71 RING — 77 RL.G 91 RING
38 RING 1
a9 RING
93 RING 1
96 RING
0.5 ON 3.9ON
3.7 ON
1 3.8ON
GPM CIA GPM : A GPM CIA
GPM CIA I
'3PM CIA
GPM 7tA I
GPM OIA
•1 GPM :)IA I GPM CIA
GPM CIA
i GPM CIA
,?1
40 56 208 ?8 2.2 ° 215
103 224 I
'1B 235
134 236
'52 242
'I 45 154 I 56 188
91 '.82
118 195
I 50 .r.` 74,,220'w SM."22s.
?0 31 235 96 '40 - 10 245
'25 260 1
•41 7-0 1
184 275 1
'83 200
1 — — —
•10 700
'43 21=
• 30 255 f1 :55 -27 275
145 295 1
t63 3C0 1
189 305 1
211 315
1 — — — —
— —
— —
9Rr'�.. 99 ' 2a5_:;Wim-'r--:Is v5►:_mS��
12
�t�
$
'00 ! 105 270 :24 280 1 142 295
1_'S
82 220
i 212 325
236 335
1 — — —
—
— —
!—tio''1"~,1a 275 "�"laa"290 "I"'�49�30�"'i�'
T70'3,S^
Btr3 �`I'4
' !!"I.
— — ..—
_—.. I
`re clameler of lnrow s aooro■Imalely 34 c ieaa for :ne 21• ;•a'ec'ory anote, 54, lees :Or t8°
150 SERIES BIG GUNS - 240 TRAJECTORY"
150 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Ndute
N02210
Nozzle
l
3"
9'
10"
1.1"
. 2"
1 3'
GPM DIA,
,Pm
CIA
GPM
OWGPM
CIA.
3PM
O:A
GPM
3IA,
GPM
31A
50
100 250,
130
270' 1
195
290'
205
310'
255
330'
300
345'
I 350
3W
S0
110 255' !
1 a3
285'
182
305,
225
325'
275
345'
330
365'
365
380'
7D 1
120 M. 1
155
300'
197
320'
245
,;i34Cr
295
360'
1 3M
380'
1 415
39S'
80
129 290' 11
165
310,
210
335'
260
355'
315
375'
380
395'
s45
4'
10
90 1
133 300'
In
320'
1 223
345' .! (•.
'275':
'365' -' 1'.
33S
390'
1 4W
410'
1 475
425" •_,1
t00
+43 DO,
185
330'
235
355'
290
375'
355
s00,
125
120'
$00
.140,
d► I rt0 I
T50 320'
195
340'
1 247
M' ..' 1
3w';":"=36s'
f
370
410'
j 445
430'
1 s25
' 120
330'
2C4
350'
256
375'
320
395'
385
zn,
165
440'
545
460'
150 R RING NOZZLES
fling
I
:,mg
Ring
Ring
Ring
Ring
+
Ring
1 +
d8"
97'
1.08'
'Ae.
1.28"
!i
1 3d'
t 41-
1 PSI,
GPM
:)IA,I
GPM
CIA.
GPM
OIA,
GPM
CtA, �
(;PM
CIA I
GPM
31A.
GPM 31A.
1 50
100
245'
130
285'
165
285'
20
_ 300'
2r35
320,
300
335'
350 3S0'
50 !
110
250,
143
280'
182
300,
225
315'
275
335
330
350'
J65 385'
70 !
120
270' 1
155
290'
1 197
310' 1
246
830'
295
3S0'
j 355
365' 1
415
I 40
123
290' 1
65
300,
210
320,
260
340'
215
360,
360
3B0'
i 445 395'
90 1
735
290.
I 175
310'
1 223
330' ... j _
275
350' j
MS
37o'
4p5
390'
1 475"'..' 4M--- I
'00 I
143
300' 1
785
32c'
235
340'
290
180'
355
380'
.25
400'
500 415'
110 I
150
310'
1 I%
330'
[ 247
350' !
305
370'
j 370
3W
j 445
410'
j 50" =-425'_.!
•20
157
315'
i 204
335
258
300'
220
360'
US
40'
-,65
120,
545 435,
' •Tne diameter of Inrdw 13 aoprournamy 3av iesa lot Rls 21' tfa!ectdry angle.
200 SERIES BIG GUNS - 27° TRAJECTORY"
200 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
Nau1e
I Nozzle
Na:zie `
Nozzle
Nozzle
.Nozzle
Nozzle
NOW
Nozxie
1
05"
1.1
I
5'
1 18
1.75.
1.9'
4•51. 1
GPM
CIA
GPM 31A-
GPM 31A.
GPM CIA
GPM CIA.
GP!1 CIA,
GPM 'JIA
GPM CIA.
GPM CIA.
GO. + _ . 250
345'
265 .355' - .. -.
330.. .375'—
_ ..393 390'
44S . 410'
513 _ 430
^_ 445'
695 .. 470'
B25, " 4 '
70 1
270
360'
1 310 380'
355 395'
415 410'
480 430'
1 555 4S0'
830 465'
1 755 495'
'_ 990 SIS'�,��
8C. 1;'.
290
375'
- 1,,',330 MV-1':�:.3B0'.Z.410'.�
446 430'.
[ $15 4a0'.;�.:-._SBO
470',-
1:..M 465'
1 .. 805 a13' ! .�9601�,a3ZSLr+i
1 90 1
310
390'
350 410•
405 425'
475 445'
- 545 465'
625 485'
1 715 505
° 855 535'
` 1005 555'
500,- 460',
I. ors': 4so'',-
660 'w a00'
k `755; "; 520'
I e00 ;-' a5a.'
M"Smobva
1'0 !
340
410'
I 390 430'
445 -t50'
525 470'
605 495'
995 515'
1 `90 535'
945 565'
' 1110 590'
i 120'" _
US
.:: 420'
.. 1„y;, 405-' �' 44W .�"y,4a'.t~80
4"=_
.i : 548 - : _ 41110' V
(_ 6.'!G : - SW"-
&V.
62S 550'
I 965 , :.5a0'
:.j'�+r�160wew"M
t30 1
370
425'
1 425 445' -
485 485'
565 485'
555 515,
.7M .,_. _
755 540'
960 580'
=S 590'
1210 620'
200 R RING NOZZLES
1 ',' Ring 1 11" Ring ;
1 'j' Ping I ', Ring -
114' Ring 1 '1' R1ng
2' Ring
n.93' anuail
1t.29' anuaq rt-46. anuaq
PS.I. I GPM JIA. GPM CIA.
[156' anuaq 1186' actual)
GPM CIA. GPM CIA.
I
11.7a" ac1ua71 {t 83' anuaq
GPM CIA. GPM CIA,
GPM CIA. '
— :.i �470 a..,a 4W .. 335 .. c ilW
. • W i:.n 415'
30 250 340' 330 370' 385 390' i 445 410,
1 455,
15 475' 585 440' 695
` b ".
70' 2r0 ��'4" 3S5''1^' 33a1394�
5.....
aY. 41405.`_"cr' 4 .425'
6a".r r�83Q"�.� ,!LSS'rr'�r,,',:l
90 1 290 170' 1 300 400'
445 .120' 515 "0'
590 455' 1 675 470,
805 490•
! .9041C'e-..�3�L31n..."y.�•,.�y*'77�
:00 1 325 390' 425 425'
500 445' 1 575 465'
160 480' Soo,
9150520'
' 120 1 355 410' 155 445'
545 465' 630 485'
725 500, 1 825 520'
385 54S'
! 13a 370'�'r'7i{S��
5�'� 17D"" 883„`�490P"
585• --880'r'�
. 025+'�' ►w�
"Tne diameter at trirow -s approximately 2% less for the 24'
.ralectory angis. 5% lees for Ind 21• Iraloctory angle.
The BIG GUN' 300rmance data nits oven obtained undar'deal teat conditions and may 0e adversely aneaed by wind, poor nyorsuiic entrance corimlions or osner IadtorL
Nelson Irrigation Corporation makes no repreeeniaiian regarding oroblet condition. unitormity, o. apolicatidn rate

FoRN litlt 1 I.:r-uom l.iytrttl III I
1•.,t [::rur,lur:: Irraaltun lI hlC:i:nl I ra,l:
Farm Owner -- - -- --- _ _ -- Facility NUMber -- W -- -' -
Irrigation Operator
Irn anon Time
Tract # Field Lagoon Date Crop Type Field Size Start Time End Time Total Number of
mm/dd/ r acres Minutes Sprinklers O eratin

:ORM IRR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owners Address
Owners Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number I _
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operators Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN loading
(lbracre) _ {9)
to M r31 IAI rsi ra, M r9i r91 tim rill
Date
mnJdd/yr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN'
(M 000 gal}
PAN Applied
(lbfacre)
low
I fdrogen Balance _
(Wacre)
(B)- 00)
Start Tune
End Time
Total
lvlirunas
(i) - (z)
S or Sprkwers
dP 9
Flow Rate
(galknin)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(6) . (5) ■ (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gallaere)
_ 7j)
Crop Cycle Totals I I
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operators Signature
Operator's Certification No.
VCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633,
inter the value received by subtracting column (10) horn (B) Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Chris Matthis
Makin Bacon
171 Raven Ln
Clinton NC 28328
Dear Chris Matthis:
5WA
,•�
NCDENR
NORTM CAROLINA DEPARTMENT of
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
August 10, 1998
Subject: Application No. AWS820032
Additional Information Request
Makin Bacon
Animal Waste Operation
Sampson County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject
application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the
following by September 10, 1998:
Lagoon capacity documentation (design, as -built calculations, etc.). Be sure to include
any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be
applicable.
2. Operation and Maintenance Plan.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical
specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested
information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the
address below. The information requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before September 10,
1998 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H
.0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit
is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 1 a3-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement
authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
Hrelyme,
wood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27826-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

- L hr� s iv at+h is
arm
Makkn CO
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE PLAN wq� EC�/
0 RQUa s p
1i
Proper lagoon liquid management should be a year-round ,priority. It is especial ECn0N
important -to manage levels so that you do not have problems during extended r'�, �199 .
wet periods. No�'Di g
Pa
Maximum storage Capacity should be available in the lagoon for periods when the "ling
receiving crop is dormant.(such as wintertime for berrnudagrass) or when there are
extended rainy spells such as the thunderstorm season in the summertime. This means
that at.the first signs of plant growth in the later winter/early spring, irrigation according to
a farm waste management plan should be done whenever the land is dry enough to
receive lagoon liquid. This will make storage ;pace available in the lagoon for future wet
periods. In the late summer/early fall the lagoon should be pumped down to the low
marker (see Figure.2-1) to allow for winter storage. Every e`fort should be made to
maintain the -lagoon close to the minimum liquid level as lorg as .he weather and waste
utilization plan will allow it.
Waiting unii, the lagoon has reaChed its maximum storag? capaclt3, before star-t:ne to
irrigate does not leave room -tor stonng excess water during extended wet periods.
Overflow from the lagoon for any region except a 5-year, 24-hour storm is a violation of
star law and subject to penalty action.
The routine maintenance of a lagoon involves the following:
Maintenance of a vegetative cover for the dam.
Fescue or corn. mon bermudagrass are the most common vegetative
covers. The vegetation should be fertilized each year, if needed, to
maintain a vigorous stand. The amount of fertilizer applied should be
based on a soils test, but in the event that it is not practical to obtain
a soils test each year, the lagoon embankment and surrounding areas
should be fertilized with 800 pounds per acre or 10-1 0-t 0, or
equivalent.
Brush and trees on the embankment must be controlied. This may be
done by mov-,ing, spraying, grazing, chopping, or a combination of
these practices. This should be done at least once a year and
possibly twice in years that weather conditions are favorable ;or
heavy vegetative growtil.
NOTE: If vegetation is controlled by spraying, t,�e herbicide must not be allowed to enter
the lagoon water. Such chemicals could harm the bacteria in the lagoon that are treating
the waste.
Maintenance inspections of the entire lagoon should be made during the initial filling of
the lagoon and at least monthly and after major rainfall and storm events. Items to be
checked should include, as a minimum, the following:
Waste Inlet Pipes, Recycling Pipes, and Overflow Pipes---Iook for:
1. separation of joints
2. cracks or breaks
3. accumulation of salts or minerals
4. overall condition of pipes

Zagoor: surface --look for:
I . _ undesirable vegetative growth
2. floating or lodged debris
Embankment —look for;
1. settlement, cracking, or "jug" holes
?. side slope stability —slumps or bul;es
2. ! wet or damp areas on the back si0p2
•4, erosion due to lack of vegetation or as a res; It of wave action
5. rodent damage.
Larger lagoons may be subject to liner damage due to wave a. ,lo; I caused by stronc
winos. These waves can erode the lagoon sldewalls, thereby weakening tale lagoon dam.
A good stand of vegetation will reduce the potential dar age caused by wave ;:coon. if
wave action causes serious damage to a lagoon sidawall, baffles in'the lagoon may by
used, to reduce the wave impacts. -
„riv of these features Could lead to erosion andweakening of the uam. if your lagoon has
any of these feat;.lres, you should call an appropriate expew'raml i3r With des!gn and
construction of waste lagoons. You may need to proviue a temporary tix if there i5 a threat
of a waste discharge: However, a permanent solution should be reviewed by the
technical expert. Any digging into a lagoon dam with heavy equiprnynt is a serious
undertaking with potentially serious consequencas and should no, oe conducted unless
recommended by an appropriate technical expert.
Transfer Pumps --check for proper operation of:
1. recycling pumps
2. irrigation pumps
Check for leaks, loose fittings, and overall pump operation. An unusually loud or grinding
noise, or'a large amount of vibration,- may indicate that the pump is in need or repair or
replacement.
NOTE: Pumping systems should be inspected and operated frequently enough so that you.
are not completely "surprised" by equipment failure. You should perform your pumping
system maintenance at a time when your lagoon is at its low level. This will allow some
safety time should major repairs be required. Having a nearly ful; lagoon is not the time
to think a -bout switching, repairing, or bcrrowing pumps. Probably, if your lagoon is full,
your neighbor's lagoon is full also. You should consider maintaining an inventory ot" spare
parts or pumps..
Surface water diversion features are designed to carry all surface
drainage waters (such as rainfali runoff, roof drainage, gutter outlets,
and parking lot runoff) away from your lagoon and other waste
treatment or storage structures. The only water that should be
con, ing from your lagoon is that which comes from your flushing
(washing) system pipes and the rainfa'1 that hits the lagoon directly.
You should inspect your diversion system for the following-
1. adequate vegetation
2. diversion capacity
3.l r1C3e berm he:- It

identified problems should be corrected prornptly. it is advisable to inspect, your system
during or immediately following a heavy rain. if technical assistance is needed to
determine proper solutions, consult With appropriate experts. 3
You should record the level of the lagoon just prior to when rain is predicted, and then
record the level again 4 to 6 hours after the rain (assumes there is no pumping).' This will
give you an idea of how much yr+ur laaoan level vvill rise with a certain rainfall amount
(you must also be record;ng your rainfall for this to work). Knowing t"mis should help in
planning irrigation applications and storage. If your lagoon rises excessively, you may
have an 'Inflow problem from a surface water diversion or there may be seepage into the
lagoon from the surrounuing land.
Lagoon Operation
Startup: :
1. Immediately after construction establish a complete ;od cover on bare soil
5unaces to avoid erosion.
?. Fili new lagoon design treatment volume a, least hair full of water before
waste loading begins, ta�,t:?a rare not ro erode lining or bank slopes.
.3. Drainpipes into the lagoon should have a fiexible pipe extender on the
end of the pipe to discharge near the bottom of the lagoon during initial
filling or another means of slowing the incoming water to avoid erosion of
the lining.
4. When possible, begin loading new lagoons in the spring to maximize
bacterial establishment (due to warmer weather).
S. It is recommended that a new lagoon be seeded with sludge from a healthy
working swine lagoon in the amount of 0.25 percent of the full lagoon
liquid volume. This seeding should occour at least two weeks prior to the
addition of wastewater.
6. Maintain a periodic check on the lagoon liquid pH. i the pH falls below
7.0, add agricultural lime at the. rate of I pound per `300 cubic feet of
lagoon liquid volume until the pH rises above 7.0. Optimurn lagoon liquid
pH is between 7.3 and-8.0.
7. A dark color, lack of bubbling, and excessive odor sianais inadequate
biologFcal activity.. Consultation with a technical specialist is recommended
if these conditions occur for prolonged periods, especially during the warm
season.
Loadmgr
E he more frequently end regularly that wastewater is added to a lagoop, the better the
lagoon will function. Flush systems t`zatwash waste into the lagoon several times daily are
optirnum for treatment: Pit recharge systems, in, which ene or more buNdines are drained
and recharged each day, also work well,

proper lagoon sizing,
mechanical solids separation of flushed waste,
gravity settling of flushed waste solids in an appropriately designed 'Qasin, or
minimrz�ng feed wastage and spillage.
Lagoon sludge that is removed annually rather than stored long term will:
have more nutrients,
have more odor, and
require more land to properly use the nutrients.
Removal techniques:
Hire a custom applicator.
Nix the sludge and lagoon liquid with a chopper -agitator impalle-
,pump th, ough large -bore sprinkler irr iga`.ion system onto nearby crcr'.and;
and soil incorporate.
Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropiand or
for2geland; mix rerr:aining sludge; pump into liquid sludge applicator; haul
and spread onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.
Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland or
forageland; dredge sludge from lagoon, with dragline or sludge barge; berm
an area beside lagoon to receive the sludge so that liquids can drain back
into lagoon; allow sludge to dewater; haul and spread with manure spreader
onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.
Regardless of the method, you must have the sludge material analyzed for waste
constituents just as you would your lagoon water. The sludge will contain different
nutrient and metal values from the liquid. The application of the sludge to fields wi!; be
limiter by these nutrients as well as any previous waste applications to that fie!d Pndl crop
,repuirement. Waste application rates will be discussed in detail in Chapter 3.
When removing sludge, you must also pay attention to the liner to prevent darna'e. Close
attention by the pumper or drag -line operator will ensure that the lagoon liner remains
intact. l= you see soil material or the synthetic liner material being disturbed, you should
stop t"e activity immediately and not resuoI^e until you are su>e that the sludge can be
removed. without Winer injury. if the liner is damaged it must be repaired as soon as
possible.
5ludoe removed from the lagoon has a much higher phosphorus and heavy metal content
than liquid, Because of this it shou'd probably ce applied to land with low phosphorus
and metal levels, as indicated by a soil test, and incorporates! to reduce the chance of
erosion. Note that if the sludge is applied to fields with very high soli -test phosphorus, it.
should be applied only at rates equal to the crop removal of phosphorus. As with other
wastes, always gave your lagoon siudge analyzed for its nutrient value.
The application of sludge will increase the amount of odor at the waste application site.
Extra precaution should be used to observe the wind. direction and other conditions which
could increase the concern of neighbors.

Practice waxer conservation —minimize budding �ti-ater,usage and
spillage from leaking waterer>'broken pipes and washdown through,
proper maintenance and water conservation.
,Minimize feed vv�astage and spiriage by keeping feeders adjasted. This
v,'i'tl reduce the amount or solids entering the lagoon
Management:
titai^:gin lagoorl liquid level between the perm.cnent storage levei and:
,ne full temporary storage level.
Pace visible markers or stakes on the lagoon bank to show the;
minimum liquid level and themaximumiiouid !ever (Figure 2-1).
D`art irrigating at the earliest possible date in the spring base.' on
r;utrie,nt requirements and soil moisture so that temporary s.o-a;e
vtii I he maximized for the summer tl"understorm season:. Sim ila, y,
irrigate in the late surnimeriearly fall to provide maximum lagoon
storage for the winter.
The lagoon liquid level should never ire Closer than I foot to the lowest
;point of the dam or e;rbanlcment.
Do not pump the lagoon liquid level lower that the permanent storage
level unless you are removing sludge.
Locate float pump intakes approximately 18 inches underneath the liquid
su,rrace and as far away from the drainpipe inlets as possible.
Prevent additions of bedding materials, long-stemmed forage or vegetation,
molded reed, plastic. syringes, or other foreign materials into the lagoon.
Frequently'remove solids from catch basins at end of-confine:-rient houses or
wherever they are installed.
Vaintain strict v,egetatic%n, rodent, and varmint control near lagoon edges.
Do not a'low trees or large bushes to grow or, lagoon darn or err.ba,nkment.
remove sludge from the lagoon either when the sludge storage capacity is
full or befora it tills 5a percent of the permanent storage volume.
If animal production is to be terminated, the owner is respon5ib+e for
obtaining and implementing a closure p.an to eliminate the possibility of a
pollutant discharge.
Sludge Removal.,
Rate of lagoon sludge buildup can be reduced by:

7Jfl�faJ Luis p alaissod 1C
asJ'S sq') Mel U12D; ` nos a0mr Sl,�j nuo 'W,2p Bq, U! 1.l..JC+ 01 sa!Ni s
ds��7 U00S SjfM 2::iAOILU aU; 'LL:BP attij dC�JWC C; pSMON? S! JatEM UOCdEl Jj i Q�i
.oF�pl
Je;?.�.ri:J%'J:i. h1Cla� +e�i13:' r.,lr':.�'i?+ lJG:+d?' � '?Ja1r�,0i '•:JCJ: aJ�;�nJ JG '�t�ll.Jta��
aspy Awy al2'w, '3:J; , ms a o ,v! ul Lwc.i
"?; ?u: ui24' Tuj pu'c ;..:,aGsuri G3 aJgy
uI wades u2 la pap :acmd jCLl,1w,up ayl U!.
CQIG C ,C :' 14Lr7 f;+'1 .'al s' aidulexe w- n:m.onzs UCOE21 ay a 1.0i;P.^iiijPOlv/�
Gy. `c' pup u331560 J;rdcjd 2u:u.,r ss3y 'w?p
Zti: O .ACC• •.1 e'S ..! ,i f I C �� Uq 1: 1 ci 1 -,"
:�. '�.,'.1 .]l;�U��.... G�+�.i '7 ::� J �.;.i .7��1� d�.. ��r �. �� Ci...Q%1C�� P�'.'J�i.i til ScJfi1121
sddA.-_ al:l 1:10.1:memaisn, /, o al.rt�gw, �.te:;:J� dun '15eJ 2u1 :+� jjn Sa:%�'Z� uo"1a7
. ,
,)xpe j uoo3e r jo sasne:) ajq!s`o,3

ml
NO!
ITI; NEWE'Sim
N:N-M,MMN!M
EM

Please review the attached plan and specifications carefully.
Retain this plan for your use and retards. It is strongly
recommended that you, your contractor and the Sail Conservation
Service personnel are in agreement as to haw the waste lagoon
is to be constructed. SCS personnel will meet with all
concerned parties and walk over the site to emplain all flags
and markings. It is important that everyone understands what is
expected so that final construction meets plans and
spec: i f 'c cations and the .job can be certified for payment (i f AC.F'
cost -share is involved) .-
The pad dimensions and ;grades are the best estimate. The
bui l der or contractor" is responsible for f I nal layout and
design of the pads. SC:S personnel will assist in a l i m i teed
capacity, as its major concern is the proper- design and
construction of the waste treatment lagoon.
The actual amount of material required for ,ads and dam may
'Mary from the estimates. The design will attempt to balance
cuts and fills as close as poss i L- l e. If additional material is
required after construction is complete on the lagoon, the
contractor- and owner" will negotiate on the price and location
of the borrow area.
It should be noted that certification of the lagoon will depend
upon 1 all spec i f i cations cue' i ng met . Important i tem s i nc l i. de
length, width, depth; s l Lies, topsoil placement, correct
iele4ations (top, bottom, discharge pipes), and geeding.
NOTE -
Design Requirement,
453197
cu.ft _
16765 cu.yds.
Estimate
of Excavation:
0
CUM -
0 cu.yds.
Estimate
of F'adz
0
cu.ft -
c=i cu. yds.
Estimate
W Dike.
0
cu. F t =
0 cu.yds.
Est l mAte
of Topsoil Required:
C u. ds.
Ratio
ERROR 1
Job Cl ass
Designed Dy
Datr3

----------------
TYPE AND
SIZE 2448 finishing
0F OPERATION
CLASS
DESIGNED
BY Howard Hobson
DATE
APPROVED
BY
DATE
PERMANENT
STORAGE
2448
Hoss x 135 lbs per
hos 1 Cu
Fer !b'
330480
Cu
Ft
TEMPORARY
STORAGE
3304�0
|bs of anima! 1.35 cu.
ft. of waste
per day
B0307
Cu
Ft
pe�- 1000 |bs of animal wt.
x 780 days
RAINFAUL
LE EVAPORATI[}N
T" X
72704 sq. ft. surface
area per 1Z"per
ft _
42411
Cu
Ft
R�ALL
- 25 YR. 1 E� A Y STORM
7" X
727O4 sq. fL of surface
area per
z2" per ft.
+2411
Cu
Ft
TOTAL STORAGE
NEEDED
453197
Cu
Ft
16785
Cu
Yds
TOTAL STORAGE
AVAILA21-E
47300O
Cu
Ft
17519
Cu
Yds
,
MAMURE AND URINE PF;,'ODUCTION
Z`448 hoos x 2.1 tons per year 5141 T./yr.

t :' ' • DEPTH C AREA OF TOP + _AREA` OF BOTTTi tM + 4 X AREA OF MIDSECTION 7
VOLUME-------------------------------------- -----------------------------
6 . C) 47
DEPTH C L ): W + L w+ 4 ?' I.- ?; W 1
VOLUME=----------------------------------- ---------------------
2 7
70
VOLUME=------- ------------------------__-------------------.-_-----
10 . i_) C ,_ s _ C)c i ]
VOLUME =-----------------
6 '.7
473000 C:U . FT.
VOLUME =---------
7
VOLUME = 17519 C:U . YDS .
72704 sq.tt.
4531 f Cu. ft. needed
INSIDE TOP MEASUREMENTS 51'Z FT. x 1 wZ FT.
SIDE SLOPES ail

■
e�®®�e;■ ■ ®e■ ■o sw�■ ■ ■ o�i� o�i eii
�KnOMM■MM, eeeiMMMMMMEMOMMM
Boom MU®■WNE®NUIRE■■►K■■M■■'e
®®®R®NOMUN ■®NKIE■OI■■I■■■0
MRENNUMENEWESNEW®HMMUIRM

U. S.. Department of Agriculture NC-ENG-34
Soil Conservation Service _ September 1980
= - File Code: 210
HAZARD.CLASSIFICATION DATA -SHEET FOR DAMS
Landowner 1C4RI$'M47THIS County S'AMPSar%
Community or Group No. Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam Ft. Length of Flood Pool Ft.
Date of Field. Hazard. Investigation" /z / 91
Evaluation by reach of flood pla,in.downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
st, Elev.:Est. Elevation
: Kind of :Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length: Width;..Slope:..jand Use. Improvements : 'Above :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain: Flood Plain
Ft. Ft. Ft. Ft.
2
3 .
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach A SUDDEN FAILURE OF STRUCTURE WILL NOT
ENDANGER LIFE OR DAMAGE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION. -2:5 Ann i 5 in Ru e A k—
A JZ A/ A n o IS 1600 F67E T CR 4n e C k EEk
Hazard Classification of Dam (a, b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21) C1
Dam Classification (I, II, III, IV, V)
By
name
e
Concurred By_q-�,Zmj Z:�c
(name) title
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date /2/9f
Date 714z _

MATTHI'S C,-1 u n E: A ;M'F' E D. a. tp - 14
c e t o n e a. r e s t r e s :era o t h r t an o w!-i er Fee
S7EADY S-rA7—= !—'-VE- WE Tf
0 S o w s ar w f i
e C P-,-
i.
721, e a,4 f y) X
0 F 14 t;:: w s -
He7-t. .4 (Wgar; tl-:r3er iv
Z' NTNIMUM 7 V�-!Ik
V X e a t; n E t V;:. u.m� o 1 ume 4,7- If ram_ IL, s S S
T r e -a t vr
V im C- 4 c rl c -P e e t
7,-
AC,C:L:,'Y!!i "A
Vn Li rn e c4tiis -Feet
TC-7AL 2,7—==—l�Z--.N VCL�jl,�E
'2'-, 0 f e s t rf s e r" r: 1 -;5, f e q t
Cl Q1 j< e a. e V aL
Feet
7,
S ds s 1 p a s Fr e e b a d
a,, :2 e s 1 r; t i yu dA ev e I at e e v a t, i i::
t
f e -2 4-
a S 0 F- lh h :rater" a e eV a-, 0 7
U a 1 'S T I?ZL a
D T P7
AR E A
ARE'A.
AREE-A.
L Ei.
-"A, - = n ,1 7 ,4 S A p p t
Z7L . ......
A

5
TEM:--`C�`,'ARY STORA2E RE-QUl;;'.=_1D
Ora i r;a,ze Area:
L e n -, W I t h
3 15
: ' L 3.
e F o a 1-1
S t-,:: 1:1 a;-, t k. a. 4- R
L, e n t "-I W d
0 S-'cuare
Feet
TOTAL DA 51,-uar2
Feet
Des;on ternp.c.raxy sti.-trace to t:e
J a y S.
A.
vul...-Ime waste pr4-.,,JuceJ,
imate dialI product i -.-.in o� manure
i r. EFS'LW
C, I _�6
V o ! 4, ut e L tz S . S S L N X,
t
Z,
V Q I L., rr. e= 1 2, 1 *---! 5,21, C is b i c f e c- tt
Vc, > u.m e Sow a s h w a t a r
T h i s j s the a ra r, u in t c, F f r e sn- water
use=y f or" w a. s n
o ci r S C. r
vo 1 -1 m. e -6 resh water u s ed r a.
F s y s 4 U5h
S,/S4 in 5
t a E- c c u at- e tr,i e ao ci r; W a t e r
a, - a a Cc, u r! cad 4or-
j-1
e c
C n
"f I
L, p 0 1:: T, e -n .-a 'n, f 2.
E c 'i E- B, 1 t
t y
L;
days Z? c: F S r 7A a
7
V ID I L7. e a ar s rm
r; C C2 S
is -D A
T A
F; T
A c
c
c
T,
eau

SUMMARY
Total required Volume = 72264E Cubl: fret
Total des:§n 7cieme avE'.,= 202fe4 Sub;: fee%
Min. regrd. artmnt. vol, p us s;udge a c c u m #95720 Cu. 2..
At e1ev. S3.G0 Ft; Vol= 351Aa7 Cubic feet <end AQm9.Ra>
Totem! &esm vo.ume less 23yr-Z4Kr storm = 34963E Cu. Et,
At @�@v. :,.00 Ft§ Vel= 22bie fee% (S'a t p2m1:1 g
Se�sona. b SS »�tei %able eIevat.em :2.00 meets Q,.=h must
be :owes than the e e v a, :om of toP of tr■Efeemt vc.Gme 36.00
QES:Gx35 2Y;
------------
DATE=
A3Ee2732 2Y=
2ASSE SZ:LIZ«IICN ASAR
}22ITI53»S &0T33:---------------------------- ---------------------------
E

m
m -
mm
mmm mmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmm
i

mmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmm

Table of Contents , RECEIVED
Via,
Whole Farm NutAen� �A�aiage°m�t4N
�- Plan Summary
j` JINN 1 61998
Non -Discharge Permitting
Total waste/Nutrients Generated
Field su meaty/Application Calendar
Field Maps
Lease Agreement
Grandfathering Explanation
Field Data Sheets
WUP/Required Specifications
• Bt4P'S For Handling Swine Manure
Emergency Action Plan
Insect Omtrol
Odor Control
mortality
Provisions for Calibration
• Of Nutrient Application Equipment
•
• Waste Application Records
Crop Notes

About Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP)
T. Whole Farm Nutrient Management Plan Summary:
This is an assessment of the plan for the entire farm. It
includes the priority nutrient that the plan is being
developed for as well as indicating if other nutrients are
being tracked. The summary addresses soil erosion, necessary
storage availability and if there is a need for daily
spreading of waste.

EXHIBIT A-8
Waste Utilization Plan Agreement
Name of Farm All%N 34co J
Owner/Manager Agreement
Uwe understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in the approved waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the
existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage facilities will require a new certification to be submitted
to the Division of Environmental Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also.understand
that there must be no discharge of waste nutrients form this systems to surface waters of the state from a storm
event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at
the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by DEM upon request.
I (we) understand that I must own or have access to irrigation or other equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan, This equipment must be available at the appropriate pumping time such
that no discharge occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year, 24-hour storm event. I also certify that the waste will be
applied on the land according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
Name of Facility Owner (Please Print):
E
Name of Manager ( if different than owner)
Date Occ - l q 9 `)
Signature Date De-c / S„� 7
Person Who Prepared Waste Utilization Plan;
it/rVY 13,4i' Z'c
Affiliation r . <!�x . i r e ..,i: gE Phone No. 5;�/ v S 9 i r 7/ G/
Address .36 9 •Paws,. XV .
Signatu Date_ c, c .
MRCS, NC
RUNE, 1996

Whole -Farm Nutrient Management Plan Summary
Producer's name: C'!yJf%.s /11A11-7'.1
',1ress: / 7/ /PAve"v_ 4-41vr' Telephone: _ get]
ASCS Tract #: % r7� 7/ _ —,
! 7_T
4e -YrZ-Y
Farm location: 5gE5F )*,te ,c% sf a dj er—
Type of operation: Et D r n_r . iv%.r r/-r���i t=
- —
• --
Assessment of Plan for Entire Farm
circle one
■
Is the farm in a critical watershed area?
yes
no
■
Have water quality problems been identified in the watershed?
yes
If yes, what are they?
Does the plan consider these problems?
yes
no
■
Are any erosion problems apparent on the farm?
yes
no
If yes, have the eroded areas been considered' usable acres?
yes
no
'-)r what priority nutrient is the whole -farm plan being written?
N L�-' P,O5 Other
Varies with field
■
Will nutrient sources other than commercial fertilizer be used on the farm?
Cye&
no
If no, skip to last item and signature section.
■
Is enough land available on farm to use all of the primary nutrient that is
produced?
C�v
no
If no, have alternate plans been included for the excess nutrients?
yes
no
■
Is daily spreading of nutrients necessary?
Se,.k5
C:10)
■
Is land available for daily spreading?
e
no
■
Have plans been made to track the potential buildup ^f nutrients other than
the priority nutrient?
es
no
■
Does this site/farm need additional storage facilities for best use of the
nutrients, both agronomically and environmentally?
yes
If yes, is the submitting party making plans for necessary storage?
yes
no
■ Based on the facts and representation of the submitting party, will this plan
comply with technical requirements for proper nutrient management? es I70
Submitted by: Date: Dec-, / 57 % —/
IaPPl+r�nq
,)aration assistance by: j�.4�vv -� ,41 4 j� _ N.C. Cooperative Extension Service
N
1.2

J
O
4 -9
r' r'
Lo rAr r
rI
t.t
h � T
r ��'
of ♦ti
c / /
,I
I
<er:
�ti
II
-� -I ♦�
7 4.7
14
al
I
0
ti
r"
/
n

II. Total Waste/Nutrients Generated (per year)
This section includes the total volume of waste generated
(gallons or tons) as well as the total pounds of nutrients
generated. Values may be derived from tables of estimated
waste production or from actual waste records generated by the
farm. Particular attention should be noted in Table 2
under section (Included in WUP YesjNo.).. The total waste
generated on the farm may or may not be included in the Waste
Utilization Plan (WUP). If the answer is no in this section,
there is not adequate acreage available on site to utilize
this portion of the waste. This portion of the waste will
therefore have to be utilized by some other means when
necessary.
Note that the N (nitrogen) generated and having a yes answer
in Table 2 will appear on the Field Summary in Section III of
this plan under the column (Total lbs. Nitrogen).
The amount of sludge shown in Table D is for a one year period and is based
on an application method shown in Table C. The sludge should be tested
before land application.

.11. Total Waste/Nutrients Generated (per year)
A. Percent collected of produced l o d .
B. Design time of temporary storage.
Type storage Time (Day(:s)}
Liquid / ['
Dry
t 3.5 "J G k - J Lc vt L �.5 a•-.•� Zs''� 10
C. Waste Generated (� yam)
Table 1
Type
Prod.
i unit t
*
# of
Animals
**
Form of
Waste
Generated
Volume of Waste
Generated
Gals. ns
Appli,
Method
Plant Available
Waste Anal sis Values
. animal Unit
s.. 1Q Gals./'Irby
Tables
Actual
Tables
Actual
N
P
K I
Zn
Cu
N
P
K
Zn
Cu
c C,
o/ 9GO
.Z
.'ion
J.v
/?
D. Nutrients Generated/Used (per year)
TAhl P 2
Fbrm
of
Waste
Included Total Plant Available Nutrients (lbs.)
In
WUP
Yes/No
N P K Zn Cu
/Z o
795
Ova
One time capacity
** Liquid, Slurry, Dry, Stockpiled, Cmposted, Etc.

III. Field Summary/Application Calendar
** The Field Summary Sheet is the most important part of the
Waste Utilization Plan for the farm. Significant columns for
the operator include the (1) Nutrients Required column
(lbs./ac.), (2) PA (Plant Available) Applied from by-products.
and (3) Applied From Fertilir,er (lbs./ac_j_ When the (1)
NI-t-gaen Regyirement (lbs./ac.) of the crop is satisfied with
the waste application, other nutrients in the waste are also
supplied to the crop. If the waste does not contain enough of
these other nutrients, then column #(3) will show the balance
being supplied from Fertilizer (lbs./ac.). Nutrient excesses
are shown in red under (6) Net Nutrient Balance. This column
is used to estimate the buildup of nutrients on the site.
The Application Calendar following the Field Summary Sheet
indicates the months that waste can be applied to each crop
type. It may also include the rel-ative uptake of nitrogen
during the growing season for the crop.

55�-3�
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
4/3/20600
M&I-FAYET(EV Uf REMMILMI I
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Sholar Farm NCA282034
County: Sampson
Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish 6,120
Storage Structure:
Storage Period:
Application Method:
Anaerobic Lagoon
>180 days
Irrigation
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of 8 RECEIVED 1 DENR 1 DWO
AQUIFFR-PRnTFr.TInN SFUION
APR 0 6 gong

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH In the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, W, tons, etc.):
Capacity . Type Waste Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 gallyr
gallyr
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gallyr
gallyr
Farrow to Finish
10585 gallyr
gallyr
Wean to Feeder
223 gallyr
gallyr
6120
Feeder to Finish
986 gallyr
6,034,320 gallyr
Total 6,034,320 gallyr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (lbs):
Capacity Type Nitrogen Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibslyr
lbslyr
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Farrow to Finish
26 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
6120
Feeder to Finish
2.3 Ibslyr
14,076 Ibslyr
Total 14,076 Ibslyr
less 25% 10,557 Ibslyr
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season,
Total Irrigated Acreage: 31.59
Total N Required 1st Year: 10956,25
Total N Required 2nd Year: 0
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 10,956.25
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 10,557.00
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (399.25)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility,
2of8

Area Specifications
min
,
3(b) of 8

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code Crop
A Barley
B Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
C Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
D Corn - Grain
E" Corn - Silage
F Cotton
G Fescue- Grazed
H Fescue- Hay
I Oats
J Rye
K Small Grain - Grazed
L Small Grain - Hay
M Grain Sorghum
N Wheat
O Soybean
P Pine Trees
Lbs N utilized 1 unit yield
1.6 lbs N 1 bushel
50 lbs N I ton
50 lbs N I ton
1.25 lbs N 1 bushel
12 lbs N / ton
0,12 lbs N / lbs lint
50 lbs N I ton
50 lbs N 1 ton
1.3 lbs N 1 bushel
2.4 lbs N I bushel
50 lbs N 1 acre
50 lbs N I acre
2.5 lbs N / cwt
2A lbs N / bushel
4.0 lbs N / bushel
40 lbs N I acre / yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4 of 8

SLUDGE APPLICATION;
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications PAN/ rlanimal Farm Totall r
Farrow to Wean 0.84
Farrow to Feeder 1
Farrow to Finish 4.1
Wean to Feeder 0.072
6120 Feeder to Finish 0.36 2203.2
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 2203.2 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 11016 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 36 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 88.128 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
*This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5 of 8

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract
Hydrant
Type
Crop
inlhr
* inches
Sholar
1A
BoB
C
0.75
1
Sholar
1 B
BoB
C
0.75
1
Sholar
2
WaB
C
0.6
1
Sholar
3
WaB
C
0.6
1
Sholar
4
BoB
C
0.75
1
Sholar
5
BoB
C
0.75
1
Sholar
6
BoB
C
0.75
1
Sholar
7
BoB
C
0.75
1
Sholar
8
BoB
C
0.75
1
9
WaB
C
0.6
1
6of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: Sholar Farm NCA282034
Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Manager: Michael Norris
Owner/Manager Agreement:
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. I/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Signature:
Date
Name of Manager (if different from owner): Michael Norris
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist: Toni W. King
Affiliation: Murphy -Brown, LLC.
Address: 2822 Hwy 24 West, PO Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Signature:
Telephone: [phone]
Date
Date
8of8

Additional Comments:
Acres shown are 'wetted' acres. All land must be cut for hay. With the
increased rate on small grain, grower must strictly adhere to the application
windows. Small grain must be removed from the fields by April 7th.
Lbs. PAN per year reflects a 25% reduction for 2nd stage lagoon.
7of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1 Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide
evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Utilization Plan
when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, recievinq crop type, or available land.
3 Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for
other nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons
per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (See
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5 Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
1 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,
1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland
provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
2of3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover' of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal
waste during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop
production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of throe years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five
years.
23 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
3of3

CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Chris Matthis
171 Raven Lane
Clinton NC 28328
Re: Request for Information
Sludge Survey Report
Makin Bacon
NCA282032
Sampson County
Dear Chris Matthis:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
June 10, 2005 1 RECEIVED
U N 14 2005
0ENR - fAYEffEV1LLE REGIONAL OFACE
This letter is to notify you that the subject facility is in violation of its General Permit
NCA282032 Condition II1.16.
Your NPDES Permit Number NCA282032 Condition III.16 states:
"All facilities, which are issued a COC to operate under this permit, shall conduct a
survey of the sludge accumulation in all lagoons within one (1) year of receiving the
COC and every year thereafter. This survey shall include but not be limited to a sketch
showing the depth of sludge in the various locations within each lagoon. This survey
shall be submitted as part of the facility's annual report in the year it was conducted.
This survey frequency may be reduced if it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the
Division that the rate of sludge accumulation does not warrant an annual survey.
If the sludge accumulation is such that it is greater than the volume for which the lagoon
was designed or reduces the minimum treatment volume to less than the volume for
which the lagoon was designed, a plan must be submitted to the Division's Central Office
within ninety (90) days of this determination which documents removal and waste
utilization procedures to be used."
Our records indicate that the Division has not received the sludge survey results for the year
2004 from your facility. The form was due March 1, 2005. To avoid possible enforcement
action for a violation of your permit, please submit the results within thirty (30) days to the
following address:
one
N h Caro i a
atura�f
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699.1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: httpam2o.enr.state,ne.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunit ffiffirmative Action Employer— 50"% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper

Chris Matthis
Page 2
6/ 10/2005
Keith Larick
Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statue or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone] or the Fayetteville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
';�/ g.-x
Keith Larick
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: File 82-32
Fayetteville Regional Office

1 T, �' .r I'Y � Y I. f'f F 1, ,w ! / 1. . i G, ".l'{ • rP 1
�) r •,�,� CI 14 'I' ? � '{V i i s: �1 "r � 4 /� +, .,�' � .- ''i' r.. �, 1 ''i
• r �� ,yd � �• .�;'�.' , � 1r�fl�� �' � `�s r J •^ � r 5 ' ,r, '
' , +S'' ' � � / �.Li�T l 4p `At � i tqq`` � r ' r 1' _ ,,r t•
♦1 if� }'ryr r JF IY r ' `' 1 1 '4 ' ' •I !t
`'r • b.41'nA,..A:. +� � '`' L '•�' !fi �� ��v.. i 5 �r �yi�'r , �1/ • � � • r
_ _� e �aM °�taL„. tAst.. •.' ,f r4 } F° Srrfs IAt .,+°,,,E.,J`�y _ 1 ,
lx�, .$i 7S4A
1'• of � r • r'', ' ��+��s t� `ins} !'
i
r •.'.rf, s�jtf { I 777 1' �� . y r• } , - - , . � I �a. • ••ri9� s'' ' i
i 7t',L d A•I � 'I.^ 5; i � � •rr .,'; r ! !' 1
� 1• I 'J,11I i .71• f r /.IA M y' t, ! - / r *!
" •' r � iRty } _ :�'y' l � hY ti •t- 1 `ll�
.- _ . 1� �,.1 •J' '° S !• i r 'ram
c jr • ..'_ A t.. J.�•' way_ ,6144 7 j.: .• + / 1�,} 1j• ,,, . 1 S �
.>•'=��. r {• ti r !; , i � fh •:f�s is '' » � '. i', ! ,i IS , f, ;
Ij
it
Ild
-t !T•F `74 .!, r1tti •., F, -td r .,
- � , ti Hi� �r1J!5h�ri r• , „
" •,} L. 1r,f .a�i 't `'' `'�r'. S.k, .;whr�x� 1' ,, .. _.
A,i . ' fir• .t 1', ;. ,,r .. �� y r -1 .,
r ''�; ,1, �•'1.� is 1 • {, .
• 'i; ��� ;if
,. r°tl Ertl •�; ,- I � ,t/'. �♦
r r,'`'yrr,,;�•• 4l ,'•i::► Sr,F ��,I;,G.' .Y', „T.S'• r 1 'r
ArAL
ANLACL

a
Aj
rgp:7 v-
IT

;fir a�` yn'� : i 14 r =1•y { �,'~ ,,�, � ,+i k►r yr r t i • 1�r
�, .I+r, r, !'• r t r: # Lr / ' ; y ,ICI � '
•'i . • � r, } ° f'I yr�l ti ,'I :� ' x ar f �� 9 _ f� � t!
• k i ,j,r �,,; :.' �J7 1..1 _� I Ir •� .r ��� :a I y .
�° ,,' '' 1 ,r 1•T �!1•E�'�",r r Flrl, ' + :�.. • • '' 1 ,(.1� t o � . ,
l4 •;°5,1' , • • J r I � •, {— .WJMt[ T •� .SjM. ♦ L!'r „
r. ,. +�� 's I�' r `Yr [F �Y« ,!�*",I+V. 1••�,,�'t- {'il � I;7•� .y „ '
r a ,,4• +,'1w ' ,}'y ,�'t' � L�'�=� V�'r•°:• .fir
•r� �� �'� r ! r .' pia " ''�
,'+�� r • ' �r �s.��. � i �:',. r3 ,t i•r.a � ,� Iw,r ` •.S rq? .rc
� .'yy l r i . d �4,Y-, '{{ • „ { i,+ L •tea 1
IL- .r% #r , + f. i i J '+ /1 i } rrlyr • r � �.�ts �e. `
f y
k. i I rii u r Zrr ! i y+T k�••� .r
['rr'a
15 li r �•1ti � •1 > '4 r. i L / r _� �` ���' , �' ' E E,;1 ��� •
s ,t• r S T �f � C'I 11•r 'tiy 4 't l,+�\� I' �"� 4t ''rJ -W i.., rtN r'" I 4 .! y r 1k �•���kY '�}r � i
A �] L 11 r r I Jj :' / ' S + I T +{ . 7'}'E'[ 1 '�^ ti ii[• .., 4 r r �� r s t: r,. �gy�,1,,�/Y
[T i.�..11
+ N ;' ° I' ,?. a Z�r f f� 1, J,' s - Lr f,.. I � .i'•i'
�C�-arL 111� r'I �,1 _ I ,I ,��r5 •+x.Mf' r•• . :M ..• f IJ Iit + -'!
,Tk �'h l'I• {� ,.f ,j p.Sit.''fr..'MI .4..! R , .?'Ni �.�'T�•" " , _ .'J
s•r' a +s L 7 ° I . i r - / '� III F Y.-�. °{ . �'s/ 11'. w '
'° "�'e, + r ',.•�', , .cry ,;�•., �
'1t E t y '; •. •'! t - I - 5, r -' �, C .{t; [ _ `�'r ;� r iV, j • t L � S, .'
} ° ..4 5/ ,t<r.. ! SI• r 7 r• �, �5 R��'14' 1 '{ 1�
_ y" + .. r< '+'•w• 'Ir ,!- _ 1:I 1+.- r. F� y. if d, °r i! '•Yr +irr''�_,l
I:, +a' •r' _ {ti.. 1 r+..' ♦'• •. �. , i• :'.• a r - } Hrkt -7r ry-! f'1'i
�1it,
'�, r Ir • ,f r. r•� :i;A 11f. xj'C' :�:• l rY sl' l�y� rr ..rr 'I 4 r.
y�H/j �s�L p •r •1i: I � 1�'��'-I• .a. ttr = d Y ' r � + •s n.+l •',�' 4 1 a F ��`� rl I r: ':+
t � �41 r+, • ', r '/ w c a •rt v �' '�c(� !I I. i ry �
/�/ •�# ,•'I „ ° r r. r'T 'S4S ! ��� �/, --f ° yrr ',r^} ri t' ._ li
(�• �a r ti.:. 1 r-'I V.. ^ � � # 41 '�+- :'� � "i,4v r:s ,� tkT,, r r{.3 °IA 1 , '�r ,Y ,�-. ,., k - r�>i:
=, r
9 . i t.: 4 7 ,, f �I,,L, „ 1r s r
It -r �'r. :�" t � t 5y, r i•l 1Ik L h�°-.1,5 .+:+Y{
't{ I r fY�r rtE *° „1. t , !'~• , � ,- i',': f:� yyri II' it/i �i 1, �, 1.*�+I��r s� lor'rk�r l ql t �!r �KSF 1�.+}r..
pl ,d i. r .•� ,:` • , f I/: ,, r 1 ,lkr i•, s4't ai rl M /� r 4"1
01
°� b r " r 4 1 L ,a h +° 4 I. t .r s d r�♦ r.
IL
r� i, r 1 5 r 't i. / +r .. � r 1 : 1 �r T 4 it�tF�• . � / 7 r r, i ,I= 7 1 }
a r n . r 1 , 1 s �+ Ilr j'S yt"+. ,e[ ks, I i s rt •� �,r�`##°; I�;
' 1.1 1 i k- " ' L ^, f � ,r - 1 k it, i .� •Y. �'
! 1 r° c 1 7 _ - r . r,l 1 ��° c y ,t r •r,.
-� 7 ` r r•. I •I •r' : 1 r qrl � i � 7 � • r a 1;� ~'
r �
r, {� I t °.E_ , • ' , , e I .i^r ,'�I _ 1' ��'tr -fir,
4 :' ,r � �X�k4�-r I '�s`�� i8 Vs,,� !�! r .! 1 I� ! rill z.w�"'{k' .t.•, Hr i t' Itt ,iX',. ,`''_
' 1���y�}jr�""s + �•J�` `� �R, r �;1bp ' . } r. � ��,��•1N'a�>� • .. ,r ,,�r�
� ^ . , "k''r{�Y � 1 1 1 5 r ,' J r •`•.:j rip, -'q,,' t'
jiy r1 S� �`
r•,;'ii1� it.`
� �•t L r r � �rr� r�tt ,r e s , � r '�. 4 r q ;} .;�•�4�a 1! _ +///
} '. f irS k i�• R 4. �+ `'R "� ! ,k r { ' �f'• `tt „I'.1 t,,� J .,', r
, r :.f' , 5 ! .YF r. �.."15�"!`♦1y'� �1 �Ji L '±Yf, v "� `i 4 •.{�° t(
r '� '~ 79• �. it a 'Y 5_ye Ir ;x r, , a J C rYr..rW, ;.. _
s,t'« t ` , I r t ; f lysv�i ! 1 ! ,rn'- _ . ♦ .,� µ 4' A]
1:•
� I •I.• r I yr' ••t{.•"• rl ry. r i'. 0' k4 ,.� i fr. ;I,�•;}• �'ti�{5.�
r k �S- n . S r .. i• 1 , � s'1 ftil >� 7� s Rr�s+j,�r a� - 6,�2 � 7 I tL•I �ilti `irJV-Ir .
I r ,.r�. r •. �' �. �sr •a , � Rr �} $--- �T—�.�[1!•.I -t._ ..� ;,�i. I} I---, I - - --

f {
t 1 Grandfathering Explanation of Crops and Nitrogen Rates
The original plan in 1992 called for a 325 lb. nitrogen rate
for controlled grazing. The portion of bermudagrass included in
this plan will use this base nitrogen rate along with a rye
overseed equivalent to 50 lbs. nitrogen per acre. Typically NRCS
shows 50 lbs. of nitrogen per acre for the overseeded rye;
however, since a rye overseed suppresses bermuda yield slightly,
a reduction of nitrogen will be shown on the bermuda with the
deficit added back to the rye. This will more accurately reflect
the actual yield of both the bermuda and the rye. The bermuda
nitrogen rate will be 295 lbs./acre and the rye rate will be
80 lbs./acre.
This producer has access to leased land adjoining his
property. Rather than adding additional bermuda at an
environmentally questionable nitrogen rate called for in the
original plan, he will use realistic yield on the leased land.

__,wWASTE...UTILIZATION.PLAN'
(� REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state
by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, d?rect application,
or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any.discharge of waste which reaches surface water is
prohibited. 1llegal discharges are subject to the
assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the
Division of Environmental. Management for every day the
discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentacion in the design
folder that the producer either owns or has long tern
access to adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of waste, he shall provide MRCS with a
copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a
landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing
him/her the u4a of the land for waste application for the
Ufa expectancy of the production facility. -It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an
update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a
change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields base�,on soil
type, available moisture, historical data, climate
conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of application for
other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource
Management System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation
System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate
filter strips will be used where runoff leaves the field..
These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers"
required by DEM. (See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips
and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian Forest Buffers.I
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking
after waste application. Waste should not be applied when
the wind is blowing,
6. When animal waste is to be applied cn acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally
tilled cropland. When apolied to ccrservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided
the application does not occur during a season prcne to
flooding. (See "Weacher and Chace In Nor=.` Carolins" in
the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.)
5

Michael F. Easley, Govemor
William 0. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
April 24, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Christopher Matthis
171 Raven Lane
Clinton, NC 28328
Re: Request for Information
Sludge Survey Report
Makin Bacon
NCA282032
Sampson County
Dear Christopher Matthis:
AlanV. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Your Animal Waste Management General NPDES Permit contains a condition
that addresses the sludge survey requirement for the lagoon(s) at your animal
feeding operation.
Your NPDES Permit Number NCA282032 Condition IIl.16, on page 10 states.
"All facilities, which are issued a COC to operate under this permit, shall conduct
a survey of the sludge accumulation in all lagoons within one (1) year of receiving
the COC and every year thereafter. This survey shall include but not be limited to
a sketch showing the depth of sludge in the various locations within each lagoon.
This survey shall be submitted as part of the facility's annual report in the year it
was conducted..."
Our records indicate that the Division has not received the sludge survey results
for the year 2005 from your facility and your facility had not previously exempted
based on prior surveys. The form was due March 1, 2006. To avoid possible
enforcement action for a violation of your permit, please submit the results within
thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter to the following address:
-Miressa D. Garoma
Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwaterqualitv.or> Location; 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal OpportunilylAfftrmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
1o.� Caro in
ova UM1111
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

Christopher Matthis F
Page 2
4/24/2006
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you
the responsibility or liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State
Statue or permitting requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
4'�-
Steph . Barnhardt
Fayetteville Regional Office
cc: (File 82-32
APS Central Files

Michael F. Easley, Governor
o�0 wAr,��Q�
o 11111:� "c
Fr
3 20
�1M-
Christopher Matthis
Makin Bacon
171 Raven Ln
Clinton, NC 28328
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
August 11, 2008
Subject: Sludge Compliance Requirement Change
Dear Permittee:
Coleen H. Sullins Director
Division of Water Quality
In accordance with Condition III.19 of State General Permit AWG100000, your facility is
required to maintain compliance regarding sludge accumulation in your animal waste treatment
lagoon(s). As you know, the previous compliance limit was to have a minimum of four (4) feet
of treatment depth between the designed stop pump and the average elevation of the top of the
sludge blanket, This requirement was based on NRCS Standard No. 359, which was recently
modified.
As of July 2008, Standard No. 359 does not use the 4-foot requirement. Sludge compliance is
now to be based on the sludge volume as a percentage of the total treatment volume. The revised
Standard states that sludge accumulation in the permanent treatment zone must be less than 50%
of the planned treatment volume. Also, there must be a minimum of 2.5 feet of liquid above the
sludge at the pump intake location. If either of these conditions is not met then sludge must be
removed or managed in accordance with an approved Plan of Action for Lagoon Sludge
Reduction (POA). A new sludge survey worksheet has been developed to calculate sludge and
treatment volumes to determine compliance.
Our records indicate that you have filed a Sludge POA for one or more of the lagoons at your
facility. Based on the changes to the sludge requirements in Standard No. 359, your lagoon(s)
may already be in compliance without any sludge removal. Using your lagoon design (or as -
built information) and current sludge survey measurements, complete the NEW sludge survey
worksheet. If you have any difficulty in locating or understanding your lagoon design
information, please contact your technical specialist or county Soil & Water office.
One
Carolina
atura!!y
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Internet: www,nc_w_atergualitv,org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax I: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/AffirrnaNs Action Employer- 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Send both sludge survey worksheets, OLD and NEW, to the address below if you feel that your
lagoon(s) is in compliance and wish to withdraw your POA. Our staff will review the
information and notify you of our decision.
NCDENR — DWQ Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
If you have any questions about the new sludge requirement, sludge survey worksheet, or any
related matter please feel free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at 919-733-
3221.
Sincerely,
Keith Larick, Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
Enclosures
cc (w/o enclosures): Sampson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files - AWS820032

�0F W A rF9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r` North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
7 �
Coleen ti. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 1, 2007 '
Christopher K Matthis +' +'
Makin Bacon i 2 Z.
171 Raven Ln
Clinton, NC 28328
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS820032
Makin Bacon
Animal Waste Management System
Sampson County
Dear Christopher K Matthis:
In accordance with your application received on 4-Jan-07, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Christopher K Matthis, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Makin Bacon, located in Sampson County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 6120 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition III.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please_ M
careful attention to the record keeping -and -monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwatMuality.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal OpportunitylAttirrnative Action Employer— 50% Recyded110% Post Consumer Paper
Nam` Carolina
trrra!!1
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0111(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection staff may be reached at 910-433-3300. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at (919) 733-
3221.
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG 100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Sampson County Health Department
Sampson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS820032

-4
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste U
This plan has been prepared for:
Makin Bacon
Chris Matthis
161 Raven Lane
Clinton, NC 28328
990-0485
08-21-2007
This plan has been
Greer Moore
�,r3,:?,
FRD
F,atiffGE111FD
APR 0 B
�-ra�ltr�r�r,�uuol�
V:--
Clear Run Farms Consulting Services
PO Box 338
Harrells, NC 28444
(910) k5-24493
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner[Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
RECEIVED I DENR I DWQ
ML /� AQIitiF����n7l=t:Tl�� �1:D�OH
MAR 21 M9
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer)
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water onservation Commission,
Plan Approved By: /l f el
Technical Specialist Signature Date
874738 Database Version 3.1
--------------------------- -- - ---------------
Date Printed: 08-21-2007 Cover Page l

� ��.'.'li'ytle :F� �fEf;F d
S1l',
} 1�
�41"�'"r � 1'1 � � yry-nie:�iJ ��
�..,. �.��=� ri r._ a .

Narrative
Producer can also rotate in a Summer Annual 1 Winter Annual in fields 1 & 2, however depending on the
crop it follows a residual may need to be deducted from the starting PAN (20 ibs residual). Pearl Millet
Pasture is allowed 207 Ibs/acr and Winter Cover is allowed 75 lbs. of N per acre, however if it follows
soybeans, only 50 lbs. of N per acre is allowed for Winter Cover {pasture}.
All Nitrogen rates in this NUP were grand -fathered from prior NUP written by Sampson Soil and Water
and Cooperative Ext. Services.
179606 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed'. 05-06-2008 Narrative Page I of I

IM
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 5,673,240 gals/year
by a 6,120 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This
production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
13067
Incorporated
22441
Injected
24713
Irrigated
14203
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
14,587.97
6,120.665
-447,425
Year 2
14,813.97
6,210,938
-537,698
Note: in source 1D, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
179606 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-06-2008 Source rage I of 1

cable shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic
Ad estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shoN%n.
here avai table,
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (Li)
Soil Series
Crap Sequence
RYE
MEMOMMOMOM
7074
1
4.00
4.00
NIA
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 "fons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
7074
10
4.00
4.00
NIA
Wagram
Corn, Grain
75 bu.
Wheat, Grain
40 bu,
Soybeans, Mamtred, Double Crop
23 bu.
7074
11
1.70
1.70
N/A
Wagram
Corn, Grain
75 bu.
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
23 bu.
7074
12
0.90
0.90
NIA
lWagrarn
Small Grain Overseed
I.0Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
7074
13
3.501
3.50
NIA
W
Small Grain Oversood
1,0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
7074
14
2.80
2.80
NIA
lWagrarn.
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
7074
15
2.90
2.80
NIA
Wagram
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagress Pasture
i.5 Tons
7074
16
3.40
3.40
N/A
Waram
Small Grain Overseed
I.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
7074
17
4.40
4.40
N/A
Wag,,
Small Grain Overseed
I,0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagress Pasture
5',5 Tons
7074
2
2.98
2.16
NIA
Wa
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagmss Pasture
5.5 Tons
7074
2a
2.50
2.50
NIA
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
7074
2b
0.80
0.80
NIA
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudegrass Pasture
6,5 Tons
7074
3
0.70
0.70
N/A
Woom
Small Grain Overseed
I.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
7074
4
1.00
1.00
NIA
We am
Small Grain Ovemeed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
7074
5
2.10
2.10
NIA
Wa l
Small Grain Overseed
I.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5,5 Tons
7074
6
2,30
2.30
NIA
We
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (Ll)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
7074
7
2.20
2.20
N/A
Wagram
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
7074
8a
2,101
2.10
NIA
Wagram
Small Grain Oversecd
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
7074
81)
1.50
1.50
NIA
WaWm
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
7074
9
5.601
5.60
NIA
Wagram
Corn, Grain
75 bu.
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
23 bu.
7074
field 6
3.00
2.25
NIA
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
E-1 btid Bermudagrass Pasnrre
6.5 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: 54.18 52.7E
Ll
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
< 2
low potential to contribute to soluble
None
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
�- 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the root
zo ne.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that
nutrient leaching below the root zone,
improve the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency
> 10
should be considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based
Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (779), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter
Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
I �ncnc 1 1 n..,. o.:.,r.d aunnne

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper tinting of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waetp Iltiliwatinn Ts%hip
vuar I
Tract
Field
Soture
ID
Soil Series
Taff
Acres
Use.
I Acres
Crop
RYE
APpia
Period
itugen
PA
Nutrient
Roq'd
(Ibs/A)
Comm.
Fes.
Nutrient
Appiod
0WA)
Res.
Obs/A)
Appic,
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(ibs/A)
Liquid
ManuaA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gai/A
Tans
1000 pis
tons
7074
1
S7
"folk
4.00
4.00
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Itrig.
50
19.97
O.00
79.99
0.01
7074
1
S7
INorfblk
4.00
4.00
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
311-9/30
222
0
0
brig_
222
88.69
O.GC
354.7
0.01
7074
10
S7
Wagram
4.00
4.00
Cum, Grain
75 bu.
2/15-&30
92
0
20
Irrig.
72
28.7
0.
115.04
0.0(
7074
to
S7
Wapam
4.00
4.00
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
911-4/30
93
0
0
brig.
4
18.57
0.09
74.30
0.01
7074
11
S7
Wagram
1.70
1.70
Coro, Grain
75 bu.
2/15-6/30
92
0
20
brig.
7
28.7
0.
49.99
0.01
7074
11
S7
Wapm
1.70
1.70
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
9/1-4130
93
0
0
brig.
4
18.5
0.
31-54
0.01
7074
12
S7
Wapam
0.90
0.90
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
5o
0
0
brig.
5
19.9
Q'm
17.9
0.0t
7074
12
S7
Wagram
0.90
0.90
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9/30
•295
0
0
brig.
295
1 I7.
0.
106.05
0.01
7074
13
S7
Wagrarn
3.50
3.50
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
19.9
0,0C
69.90
O.Ot
7074
13
S7
Wagram
3.50
3.50
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*295
0
0
Irrig.
295
117.
0.
412.4
0.0(
7074
14
S7
Wag=
2.80
2.80
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
19.97
0.0C
35.92
0.01
7074
14
S7
Wagrarn
2.80
2.80
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9130
'295
0
0
brig.
295
117.
0.
329.94
0.01
7074
15
S7
Wagram
180
2.KO
Siimll Cruin OwTsoecd
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig,
50
19.9
0.
55.92
0.01
7074
15
S7
Wagram
2_80
2.80
hybrid Hermudagrass P suue
5.5'I'uns
311-9130
4295
0
0
brig.
295
117.
0.
329-94
0.04
7074
16
S7
Wagrant
3.40
3.40
Small Grain Ovetsecd
1.0 Tuns
loll-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
5
19.9
0.
67.91
0.01
I6
S7
agram
3.40
3.40
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
'295
0
0
brig.
295
117.
0.
400.64
O.Ot
'-'satabase Version 3.1 I1ntr P, iulctl: 5/6/.!001%' Wl )'I' Bars 1 4?1' 6

Wade Iltilb-ntinn T!mhln
V.e r
Tract
Field
Source
D
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
- -- -
RYF,
Applic.
Period
itegen
PA
Nutrient
lteq'd
(ibs/A)
Conan
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
pbs/A)
Res.
Obs/A)
Applic.
Method
Mmure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
OWA)
Liquid
ManurcA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(aae)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
I00D
gaIIA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
7()74
17
S7
Wagrant
4.40
4.40
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.
87.93
0.0(
7074
17
S7
Wagrann
4.40
4.40
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9/30
'295
0
0
Irrig.
295
117.84
OM
519.4
0.0t
7074
2
S7
Wagrarn
2,88
2.16
Small Grain Ov..=d
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig-
50
19.97
OAK
43.14
O.Ot
7074
2
S7
agram
2.88
2.16
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9/30
202
0
0
Irrig,
202
80.69
0.
17428
0.04
7074
28
S7
Norfolk
2.50
2.50
Small Gain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig,
50
19.9
0.0
65.91
O.Ot
7074
2a
S7
Norfbik
2.50
2.50
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
311-9/30
222
0
0
Irrig.
222
99.69
00
292.63
0.01
7074
2b
S7
Norfolk
0.90
0.80
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.
15.98
0.01
7074
2b
S7
Norfolk
0.80
0.80
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
311-9/30
222
0
0
Irrig,
7-22
88.68
0.
70.94
0.01
7074
3
S7
Wagrarn
0.70
0.70
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.9
0.
13.98
0.01
7074
3
S7
Wagram
0.70
0.70
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9130
•295
0
0
Irrig,
295
117.84
0.
92.49
0.04
7074
4
S7
Wagrant
1.00
1.00
SnWi Grain Overseed
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
1.0 Tons
5.5 Tons
1011-3/31
311-9/30
50
0295
0
0
0
0
Irrig.
Irrig.
50
295
19.97
117,8
0.
0.
19.9
117.
O.Ot
0.0(
7074
4
S7
Wagrant
1.00
1.00
7074
5
S7
Wagram
2AO1
2,10
Small Grain Overseed
1.0Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50:
19.97
OM
41.94
0.0t
7074
5
S7
Wagrmn
2.10
2,10
Hybrid Bermudagross Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9130
0295
0
0
Irrig,
295
117.94
OJX
247.45
0.01
7074
6
S7
Wagram
2.30
2.30
Small Grain Ovcrsced
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig,
50
19.97
0.
45.
0.01
7074
6
S7
Wagrarn
2.30
2.30
Hybrid Bermudagross Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
•295
0
D
Irrig.
295
117.
0.
271.02
0.01
7074
7
S7
Wagram
2.20
2.20
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-M l
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.9
0.0
43.94
0.04
7074
7
S7
Wagram
2.20
2.20
Hybrid Bermudagross Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9/30
0295
0
0
Irrig.
295
117.94
0.0
259.24
0.01
7074
$a
S7
Wagram
2.10
2.10
Small Grain Orersced
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.
71.90
0.04
7074
$a
S7
Wagrw
2.1(1
2.10
1lybiid liciniudagrass facture
5.5 "Pons
311-9/30
•295
0
0
Irrig.
2951
117.84
0.
424.21
0.01
7074
8b
57
War ian1
1.5(I
i 50
Small (itnin (lvrrscrd
I,II'fnns
10/I-3/.31
5U
D
1 O
brig,
I 5
19.9
0.
29.96
0.01
�74
8b
S7
Wagtani
Eiyhrid
=(,,
lictnurdagrass Pasture
5.5 Tuns
3/1 9/30
202
0
0
brig.
20
80.69
0.
121.03
0.0(
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/6/2008 WUT Page 2 of 6

Waste Utilization Table
ven r 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
APpbr-
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Redd
(lbs/A)
Cantu
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
pbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
AppLc
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Qbs/A)
Liquid
ManumA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
7074
9
S7
Wagr=
5.60
5.60
Com, Grain
75 bu.
2115-6/30
92
0
20
Irrig.
72
2836
0.00
161.06
0.01
7074
9
S7
Wagram
5.60
5.60
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
9/1-4130
93
0
0
Wig,
41
18.57
0.00
104.0I
0.Ot
7074
field 6
S7
Norfoik
100
2.25
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
SO
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
44.94
0.01
7074
field b]FS7
orfoik
3.00
2.25
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
222
0
0
Irri
222
88.68
0.00
199.5
0.04
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
6,120.66
Tota! Produced, 1000 gallons
5,673.24
Balance, 1000 gallons
- 47.4
Total Applied, tons
0.04
Total Produced, tons
0.04
Balance, tons
0.01
Notes: 1. in the tract colwnn, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/6/2008 WUT Page 3 of 6

Waste Utilization Table
Yrar 2
Tract
Field
Suurce
11)
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Appbe.
Period
itrrten
I'A
Nulrienl
RcgV
pbs/A)
CoArim.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(I WA)
Rcs.
(IWA)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
Nutricnt
Applied
Obs/A)
Liquid
ManumA
pplied
(awe)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(a-)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Fieid)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
ID00
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tuns
7074
1
S7
Norfolk
4,00
4.00
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
5o
0
0
brig.
50
19.97
0.0
79.8
0.0(
7074
1
S7
Norfolk
4.00
4.00
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
311-9130
222
0
0
hrig.
222
88,68
0.
354.70
0,01
7074
10
S7
Wagram
4.00
4.00
Wbeat, Grain
40 bu.
911-4130
93
0
0
Irrig.
4
18,57
0.0474.30
0.01
7074
10
S7
Wagram
4.00
4.001Soybeans,
Manured, Double Crop
23 bu.
411-9/15
92
0
0
Irrig.
92
36.75
00
146.99
0.04
7074
11
S7
Wagrarn
1.70
1.70
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
911-4130
93
0
0
brig.
47
10.5
0.
31.59
OAX
7074
11
S7
Waumn
1.70
1.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
23 bu.
411-9115
92
0
0
Irrig.
92
36.75
0.
62.47
O,Ot
7074
12
S7
Iwagram
0.90
0.90
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19,97
0.
17.98
D.Ot
7074
12
S7
kagraun
0.90
0.90
Hybrid Bermadagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9/30
*295
0
0
brig.
295
117.
0.
106.05
0.01
7074
13
S7
Iwagam
3.50
3.50
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.
69.90
0.01
7074
13
S7
Wagram
3.50
3.50
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9/30
4295
0
0
brig.
295
117.
0.
412.4
0.01
7074
14
S7
Wagrarn
2.90
2.80
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19,97
0.0
55.9
0.01
7074
14
S7
wagram
2.80
2,80
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
4295
0
0
Irrig.
295
117.94
0.
329.914
0.04
7074
15
S7
Wagram
2.90
2.80
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
19,9
0.
55.9
0.0(
7074
15
S7
Wagram
2.80
2.80
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9/30
*295
0
01
]Trig.
295
117,84
0.0
329.94
0.01
7074
16
S7
agram
3.40
3.40
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.
67.91
0.01
7074
16
S7
Iwagram
3.40
3.40
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9/30
*295
0
0
Inig.
295
117.94
0.
400.64
0.04
7074
17
S7
Wagram
4.40
4.40
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.0C
87.98
0.01
7074
17
S7
Wagram.
4.40
4.40
Hybrid Hermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9/30
4295
0
0
iaig.
295
117.84
0.
519.47
0.01
7074
2
57
Wagram
2.89
2.16
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
brig.
50
19.97
O.00
43.14
0.01
7074
2
S7
Iwagram
2.89
2.16
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9/30
202
0
0
brig.
202
80.69
O.00
17418
0.01
7074
2a
S7
orfolk
2.50
2,50
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Inig.
50
19.97
0.
65.91
0.01
1074
2a
S7
Norfolk
2.50
2.50
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
311-9130
222
0
0
Irrig.
2
88.68
0.
292.63
0.01
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 516r2008 WUT Page 4 of 6

Waciw 1 IM;72tinn Tahla
Tract
Field
Soutce
9)
Sail Series
Total
Acres
Use.
1 Acres
Crop
RYE
AplAc.
Period
itcgen
PA
Nutrient
Regd
(lbs/A)
Comm,
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Mmum
PA
Nutrient
Applied
9WA)
Liquid
ManureA
ppSed
(acts)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
100D
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
7074
2b
S7
Norfolk
0.90
0.90
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19970.
15.98
0.01
7074
2b
S7
Norfolk
0.80
0.80
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
1 311-9/30
222
0
0
Irrig.
222
98.68
0.
70,94
OAt
7074
3
S7
Wagram
0.70
0.70
Small Grain Oversced
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.01
13.99
0.01
7074
3
S7
agram
0,70
0.70
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9130
'295
0
0
Irrig,
295
117.94
0A
92.49
0.01
7074
4
S7
lwagratn
1.00
1.00
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig,
50
19970.
19,97
0.01
7074
4
S7
agram
1.00
1.00
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9130
•295
0
0
Irrig,
29
I i 7.84
0.
1 I7.84
0.01
7074
5
S7
Wagram
2.10
2.10
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
so
19.97
0A
41.94
OAM
7074
5
S7
Wagram
2.10
2.10
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9130
'295
0
0
Irrig,
295
117.94
0.
247.45
0.0(
7074
6
S7
kagram
2.30
2,30
Small Grain Ovcrseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig,
50
19,9
0_
45.94
0.01
7074
6
S7
Iwagrain
2.30
2.30
Hybrid Berrnudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9130
'295
0
0
Inig.
295
117
0A
271.0
0.01
7074
7
S7
Wagram
2.20
2.20
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/3)
50
0
0
Irrig,
50
19.97
0.
43.94
0.01
7074
7
S7
Iwagram
2.20
2.20
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9130
10295
0
0
Irrig.
295
117.94
0A
259.24
0.01
7074
8a
S7
Iwagram
2.10
2.10
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.0
71.9Q
0.01
7074
8a
S7
agram
2.10
2. )0
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9130
11295
0
0
Irrig.
295
117.
0.
424.21
0.04
7074
8b
S7
agram
1.50
1.50
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19,97
O,GC
29.
0.01
7074
8b
S7
Wagram
1.50
1.50
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
311-9130
202
0
0
Inip,
202
80.69
O,IX
121.03
0.04
7074
9
S7
Wagram
5.60
5.60
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
911-4/30
93
0
0
brig.
47
19,57
00
104.01
0.(M
7074
9
S7
Wagram
5.60
5.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
23 bu.
4/1-9/15
92
0
0
Irrig.
92.
36.75
0.
205.79
0.01
7074
fccld 6
S7
Norfolk
3.00
2.25
Small Grain Overseed
I. 0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
5
19.97
0A
44.
0.01
7074
field 6
S7
Nurlitlk
3.00
2.25
Hybrid Bermudagrms Pasture
6.5 Tons
311-9/30
222
0
0
Irrig.
88.6
OXK
199.5
0.04
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/6/2008 WUT Page 5 of 6

Wacfa l Ifili-ratinn Tsihip
VPQr 7
Tract
Field
Source
ID
L Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Appiic.
Period
itrTen
PA
Nutrient
Rcq'd
(lbs/A)
Cimm.
Pert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res.
(]W-A)
Applic.
Methud
Marius
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Obs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre!
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
IOQO
ggIA
Torts
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1o00gallons
6,210.94
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
5,673.2
Balancc, 1000 gallons
-537.7
Total Applied, tons
0.01
Total Produced. tons
0.0(
Balance, tons
0.0(
Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, awned. 2. Symbol' means user entered data.
Database Vernon 3.1 Date Printed: 5/6/2008 WUT Page 6 of 6

ne Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies
with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in
runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to
receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one application
event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application hate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
7074
1
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
7074
10
Wagram
0.60
1.0
7074
11
Wagram
0,60
I.0
7074
12
Wagram
0.60
1.0
7074
13
Wagram
0.60
1.0
7074
14
Wagram
0.60
1.0
7074
15
Wagram
0.60
1.0
7074
16
Wagram
0.60
1.0
7074
17
Wagram
0.60
1.0
7074
2
Wagram
0.60
1.0
7074
2a
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
7074
2b
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
7074
3
Wagram
0.60
1.0
7074
4
Wagram
0.60
1.0
7074
5
Wagram
0.60
1.0
7074
6
Wagram
0.60
1.0
7074
7
Wagram
0.60
1.0
7074
8a
Wagram
0.60
1.0
7074
8b
Wagrasn
0.60
1.0
7074
9
Wagram
0.60
1.0
7074
field 6
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
"ncnc n.....L--- A r......:-- I i TN-.- n_: a crc i'nno 1 A V n--- i -ir i

kr, The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
I.= g g g g
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
-: concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
<..r rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
1r g g
clean out. this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority- nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copperand zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability forsludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. if this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rats
1000 gallac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
ISO
13.16
76.72
153.45
230.17
Flay 6 ton R.Y.1-
300
26.32
38.36
76.72
115,08
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
71.93
143.86
215.78
--------------------------------------- ------------------- -------------
179606 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-06-2008 Sludge Page 1 of I

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
` date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
4=.•�- Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity. this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storap-e CaDacitv
Source Name
ISwine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
=
I80
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
68
1
2
50
1
3
65
1
4
70
1
5
104
1
6
139
1
7
169
1
8
168
1
9
171
1
10
154
1
11
141
1
12
124
2
1
101
2
2
81
2
3
94
2
4
102
2
5
137
2
6
173
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
160
2
II
141
2
12
121
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
-----------------------
179606 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-06-2008 Capacity Page I of I

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
qr Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
Mr. David Matthis
Makin Bacon Farm
Route 4, Box 336
Clinton, NC 28328
Dear Mr. Matthis:
4*A
EDEHNR
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
May 4, 1994
SUBJECT: Complaint Investigation
Enclosed is a copy of the complaint report that you requested. As stated in the report,
no further action is required based on our findings.
If you have any further questions regarding this matter please address them to me or Mr.
Ricky Revels at [phone].
Sincerely,
Mic . Moody
Environmental Technician
MDM/zlt
Wochm&3 SUlding, Suite 714, Fayetteviffe, North Carolina 28301-5lW Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity ArrumaRve Action Employer 60% recycled/ 10% post-c onsumer paper

Date Received Complaint: March 28, 1994
Complainant's Name: Anonymous
Address 8 Phone No.:
Type of Complaint: Hog Farm
Location of Complaint/County: Clinton/Hwy 421 South/Redhill Church, Sampson Co.
Date of Investigation: April 13, 1994
Investigator: Ricky Revels and Michael Moody, WQ Section
Samples Taken: Yes: No: X
Narrative of Investigation Actions and/or Recommendations: An inspection of the hog
farm revealed that farm owned by David & Chris Matthis/Quarter M Farms/Pete Murphy
was properly managing animal waste. No runoff was observed, with rye and corn crops
established for waste utilization. No surface water sources were observed impacted
as a result of this complaint. Chris Matthis's answer was no, when asked if the
observed spray gun system had been allowed to irrigate in an one place for any
extended period of time. The fields appeared to have be evenly loaded, due to the
medium green color consistency observed as a result of this complaint inspection.
Mr. Matthis inidicated that the reel gun system has been allowed to set idle in the
fields for extended periods, while not being operated. No further action necessary
as a result of this event.
Other Sections Involved:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Chris Matthis
Makin Bacon
Rt 4 Box 332
Clinton NC 28328
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Makin Bacon
Facility ID#: 82-32
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Matthis:
EDEH1�lR
NOV 19 1996
10)XLE
P;,, ()1-r= cE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.ir
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, �oA�
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 �� An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 I�'J, � 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper