830014_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

2 VR
NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

ArJs 63 6 o (q
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste U
This plan has been prepared for:
T. G. Gibson Farm
T. G. Gibson, III
P.O. Box 165
Gibson, NC 28343
843-265-4971
05-12-2004
RFCEIVEO
tion
OR 14 20
oar-FAYEMLLEFE OMM
This plan has been developed by:
Dana L. Ashford
USDA-NRCS Laurinburg FO
231 East Cronly Street
Suite 400
Laurinburg, NC 28352-3820
910-277-2433
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
1 (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. 1 have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
�f41� s—,// --) ,6s'
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
Technical Specialist Signature Date
............... --- ------------- - ....
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-12-2004 Cover Page I
RECEIVED ! DENR I DWQ
A(]UIrr-R'QQnTPr.TInN grr,TION
APR 0 1 2fl09

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 4,004,640 gals/year by a 4,320
animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
9224
Incorporated
15840
Injected
17445
Irrigated
10026
Max. Avail,
PAN (lbs) +
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
1 Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
10,026
11642
-1,616
4,650,0931-645,453
----- - ---- - - -- -- --- -- --
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
' Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-12-2004 Source Page Page 1 of

Narrative
T.G. Gibson Farm WUP
Farm is a Feeder -Finish Swine operation with a capacity of 4320 animals.
The temporary storage capacity is 180 days.
tom►
The nitrogen removal per acre data was adjusted to meet the original WUP amounts,
from the WUP dated 6/8/1994.
...-- -------------------- --- -------------- ---- ------ ---- ---• -- ------------------- ----- .------- ----
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-12-2004 Narrative Page Page l of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Uscable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
28
Pull l
4.75
4.75
10.0
Gilead
Small Grain Overseed
L0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
28
Pu112
4.70
4.70
10.0
Gilead
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
28
Pu113
6.00
6.00
10.0
Gilead
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
28
Pull4
3.20
3.20
20.0
Kenansviile
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
28
Polls
5.14
5.14
10.0
Gilead
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 'Cons
28
Pul16
5.00
5.00
10.0
Gilead
iSmall Grain Ovcrseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
28
Pull7
4.70
4.70
10.0
Gilead
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: 33.49 33.49
Ll
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
�= 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the root
zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391 }.
498347 Database Version 3,1 Date Printed 5/1212004
PCs Page Page 1 of I
NOTE: Symbol ' means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(IWA)
Comm.
Fem
Nutrient
Applied
(tbs1A)
Res,
(IWA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(IWA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gallA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
28
Pull1
S7
Gilead
4.75
4.75
Small Grain Overseed
I.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
94.87
0.00
28
Pulil
S7
Gilead
4.75
4.75
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
0300
0
0
Irrig.
300
119.83
0.00
569.20
0,00
28
Pull2
S7
ilead
4.70
4.70
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
93.87
0.00
28
Pu112
S7
Gilead
4.70
4.70
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
•300
0
0
Irrig.
300
119.83
0.00
563.21
0.00
28
NO
S7
Gilead
6.00
6.00
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1 -3/3 1
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
119.83
0.00
28
Pu113
S7
Gilead
6.00
6.00
Hybrid Bermudagrass Ilay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*300
0
0
Irrig.
300
119,93
0.00
718.99
0.00
28
Pull4
S7
Kenansvillc
3.20
3.20
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig,
50
19.97
0.00
63.9E
0.0o
28
Pu]14
S7
Kenansville
3.20
3.20
Hybrid Bermudagrass flay
5.5 Tons
311-9/30
•275
0
0
Irrig,
275
109.85
0.00
351_51
0.00
28
Pu415
S7 iGilead
5.14
5.14
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
102.66
0.00
28
11015
S7
Gilead
5.14
5.14
hybrid Bermudagrass flay
5.5 Pons
311-9/30
*300
0
0
Irrig.
300
119.83
O.00
615.94
0.00
28
M16
S7
Gilead
5.00
5.00
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0,00
99.86
0.00
28
Pu116
S7
Gilead
5.00
5.00
Hybrid 1ermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
0300
0
0
Irrig.
300
119.83
0.00
599.16
0.00
28
Pull7
S7
Gilead
4.70
4,70
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/3l
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19,97
0,00
93.87
0.00
28
Pull7
S7
Gilead
4.70
4.70
Hybrid Bennudagrass Ilay
5.5 Tons
311-9/30
•300
1 0
1 0
]rrig,
300
119.83
0.00
563.21
0.00
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/12/2004 WUT Page Page 1 of2

Waste Utilization Table
Year I
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Comm.
Fert -
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res,
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
it
N
N
N
10DD
ga11A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1oD0 gallons
4.650.09
Total Prodwed, I000 gallons
4.004.64
balance, 1000 gallow
-645.45
Total Applied, tons
ill=
0.00
Total Produced, tom
0.00
Balance. tons
IWNM
1 0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol • means user entered data
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/12/2004 WUT Page Page 2 of 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
28
Pull]
Gilead
0.35
1.0
28
Pu112
Gilead
0.35
1.0
28
Pu113
Gilead
0.35
1.0
28
Pu114
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
28
Pu115
Gilead
0.35
1.0
28
Pullb
Gilead
0.35
LA
28
Pu117
Gilead
0.35
1.0
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 5/12/2004 IAF Page Page l of I
MOTE: Symbol ' means user entered data.

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source,
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. on sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes,
phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
Iblac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Com 120 bu
150
13.16
54.16
108.31
162.47
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
27.08
54.16
81.24
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
50.77
101.55
152.32
..... .. .. .......... ...... -- ........... - ..... --...-............
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-12-2004 Sludge Page Page I of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the fast crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary Storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
911
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
64
1
2
48
l
3
138
1
4
144
1
5
149
1
6
155
1
7
160
1
8
165
1
9
180
1
10
161
l
11
143 11
l
12
118
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
. ........ ......................... ----- .......
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-12-2004 Capacity Page Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. if the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur ofl'site or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
.....--------- -------- ---------- ....... ....... ..
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/12/2004 Specification Paae I

S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
....... ..... ..... .......................... . ------ - - . - ..
498347 Databaso Version 3.1 Date Printed. 5/1212004 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a Iower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall.be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
yea rs.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
.................. . ... ...... ....... -- ..... ................ .................... ---------- --...... _....... ---.--.....-.
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/12/2004 Specification Pape 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): Pull1, Pu112, Pu113, Pull5, Pu116, Pu117
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Effective artificial drainage MUST be in place to achieve Realistic Yield Expectations
provided for these soils.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 Ib/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): Pul14
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs I" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 Ib/ae N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
.. ..... ---- . ...... - - -- --- ----------------- --­- ---- .....-
a9s347 Database Version 3.1 Dace Printed: 05-12-2004 Crop Note Page Page I of 2

The following crop note applies to field(s): Pull1, Pu112, Pull3, Pu115, Pu116, Pu117
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at ]-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 Ibs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): Pu114
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
... ...... .. ... ...... . ....--- ...- ... ._.... --- ............. -- -- ....-.-....
498347 Databasc Version 3.1 Dale Printed: 05-12-2004 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 2

41,
i.
k• ,xNi'jr�'S C I , Yi ,r r�i � E:` a r ��'a.'dr1-/fl�S^:��r.,"75�;„"��"N�`��fa •,a?•'ru.P.. .!'� 'i. ;,.�.r � :irk}.
t ii I f ' _ � °,. , \ �` f r.�.+ � _-..tr� � ;: e1�r,L �yr'� .a, 1 �� :, iJyj �r r• I r'ft '�
'i
Wt
j`
,
%��yrs.`' :, f., a .... , 1,� i, a tir: r f. "s • r `t, Nr tt�
- •.a M'"' .tip
4-
xf�. . 4t s a `T"':v f . _T,,. R4[ [� �,.( � [ •Cr -• � - , - +.. . ? ' '�+ t ;.1�'r. y�' 1 _�
.i� �,i !f�.t ` ��'+,�^ '� �Sn.Ti"• ?;�, ;� 1 !�1:: i,' : {;: ~.?':., ` �\ r . c• 4'__ - ., - ~' -� 1,r, 5,e 'C�;�•'y+k, �'�yCL{t,
.• a�4 .rd-r � y;' 4`i��" :� E,ef�L;•} ::I: � ,s';{:1: A - '' ' +.� � '� -c4•� � [� 1 � }!.. a ,�Yi' `ft�`�'k'!:S" <fi "'.•Mi�1 s�r:t'r�c,,i�
+:T`�" r ' � •'' _ E ,le,, t: �a}. �I, - ti �E r _ S•.c•,A M : +�,, -
_ ,'L!' •.+ �, Sri c ,i' f• r. I . �iC7iC?, tr'}�i�-� •1,Z1
t„�., 1 .a ems• �M �, ,• r`t� �r`.,S✓� �y S �, `e' r�„y �'�� t •�Y }�� •.,iirK��C'r}a yy�
14
'.•�C�S
j�.i.� ']yM�� -...� ,,•� • •��✓'��.. �, - "� �,�;-�_?1:. rrn' �yalrx�r `L� y�°.} + �.i s- „� � _.. C(� � _ 1< "'} 4 r(� ,-•� ..
.�-''" '�!� '�� ��. � �� r I 't� r3- i �f�r � F �' � 1, t •�"� r 1 � t ' lI arm y �• a .. •
nymlrrs^.:.:,. '- _'.:..--� rrr� :.� .� . ?✓,� rl A`-�.� -,. r - •��;. ..+t� .� _:r�r .�lt "s3. � ^'ir -y �.rt.: 1�� `t r
ti:L.. ,ic; artiCJdh . �F",:Nf,- �'' r� •.i .•}'� i -Fly :I'� �:r' • r n s 4° : f +-y ti test. G,'
}i�xayy��rb..�+1?'5:,,, � 2 �'.J: j�Y �.�:. �:� 4N i �:i.i�'y` ��y .•,"K �.'}'4 •�FY •� . i , ,.r, � r- '. J±�+ ��� •, t.�4,•�'-
• _1w7.� _ tti+ 7h A '+h ay J�: �• �' ��. :� �r.a •i'y l� J�.lr •'i f' S, � � � Y.�n�-•!^ :�f F,c, Z+"•r .. .
��� a..:� ��:�. ��_7k' �� � .� �. %'_ S- - ,t_ j,r �' ��+'r rW�^�t�• r C �:r `t,?.?-,',ry`. + r +i _
' _=' _ - ram-.. �.:-.:,� > �.. •ri ;�. x� _ `�"t te'�. •'.�'i�i:�:�k•,ti$�i� a�} 'e. w„ r '>,t. ,r..Y ..an-'i;.,�. ��� ��'r } �'•_.
-yr7:,�,�:_ i � 1.- 'y✓'+,'�,.I, _ � ' y;,"-�' Y'rY"n":' ~ ~:'•�„�i �:��-�'>h i-4•`4 � �' �� ?a�' , � ,r C �,• i �w.= ,�.�- "„
,r. ! � 1.5. "f' � ~ .Ir�•' - �tr». a•:� r 4�1- ='�iJY'Y. 'R.: �1 r �i�s di'�' yr K'� Yu '"�t t + ,
•: J � (7 C r �'zr_ � , IF r."Y• ... *.�.. ,j � Mr r6, _r } 1, .. r � w'i ��� � °.f'�fC f��• - i•,r � '-y .
• .. : � � r-, i "� � � ..r ; -Yn r a �Jls' .�!'"•. w•+ p ryjC?tF *!!. ] ;� y 'sy...,' _ , i4
' [s [n:_ ' e.ip
.� ?1 ., /'r ••. �,rr5�, r_ r r t ar � 4" ....i .-�ac`. ��.
' 7`�i>?_tY �� �TM"' ..�r�j>1-aY r�. �_ •• � �r,,...f ' ' _�" " s�'"-� 3- '...•fi„� -4 �117t:�` 1 ;,'rrr+ � �4? rye � -�'.•� - ._
06
•, . � �.r - � �r �� tr..iw�lz:-r = � �y` � e :' -�'_�_ � �` _'; � c s., •'T'•' ' _ :, w � . r- ;+-.'* ...�'"$
:Z .. �j►A �w .. �N 4 :-a" �T _!� ] 'T ,ra7r l�.�`- �i��i •, •. '=•"'" �t 2"'• .'n,`..
• � J � .,Y.• �rHf�• y, .li,
,•\ 9Y;•':'T hS •'+FRS (rs�.'r.•,• �%:fl 11 ,.h .
r� + C'f _ /,:(• 'r' rJb+• 4Yr' :^rF-• - �iT� V t� µr� ,��4V - r r� w•i�' S"'7.r wy.,. �:].
.1t0+... _ � /�:. ,�i• �; ems'%';.., i ' � *.�t `:iF....n.z3:'>«'�Y.1;`-.. �i �!�. ""': .a�'':�`,.:"��',��.�s'..�t" .

Pbosphorus Loss Assessments Too! Completion
Name of ]~aeility: i . Cr . ir►B5on1 Facility Number: $ 3 114
O-wner(s) Name: T. (,-.(rtaON tL PheneNo: &43-ZI65-9q--I
Mailing Address: p p. r. o x 165, &-,43-sorv, Ne- 2$3 H3
Check the appropriate box below, and sign at the bottoms:
Q"Ne fields reeeired a high or very high rating.
❑ Yes, the .fields listed below received a high or very high rating:
Field Number _T Slz:c f cres) _ Rativapzagh or Very High) _
Please use as many additional attachment forms (PLAT-A.-10-31-03) as needed for additional fields.
By completing the above section and any addxtioraal attachments and by signing ibis forrn, the facility
O%sner and Tecimical Specialist acknowiedge all application fields were evaluated using the Phosphorus
Loss Assessmeot Tool. All necessary calculations were completed to conduct the Assessment. A copy
will be kepi on site with the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan. Any future modifications must be
approved by a technical specialist and filed with the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. Waste plans with fields having a bigb or very high rating will have to be modified to
address phosyhorus loss by the next pennit cycle beginning July, 3007.
0%&mer Name:
T. d. G'. �6s� �
Owner Signature: Date:
Tecbnical Specialist Name: Z),q lvA 195HF61? P,
Techuiml Specialist Siguamre: P�W-'ef Dite: 0
Affiliation: C�S�A- �(.1 ��� �4irs-�.?bk��j r� Phone"No: 91y -0?7-7- �'133
Submit this form to.
Atm: K!=itb latrick
PLAT-12-11-03
4

Michael F. Easley, Governor
O�OF W ArF9pG
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 1, 2007 -
T G Gibson i JUN 2 7 ���7
T. G. Gibson r
PO Box 165 "
Gibson, NC 28343
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS830014
T. G. Gibson
Animal Waste Management System
Scotland County
Dear T G Gibson:
In accordance with your application received on 25-Jan-07, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to T G Gibson, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the T. G. Gibson, located in Scotland County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 4320 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition Ill.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay
careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwatemualgy.pM Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recyded/l0% Post Consumer Paper
} .q��Carolina
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed. .
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey arty property rights -in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0111(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be fled at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection staff may be reached at 910-433-3300. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at (919) 733-
3221.
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Scotland County Health Department
Scotland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS830014

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWNP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C, the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 122.41 including civil penalties, criminal
penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A namelownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual NPDES Permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
U
for Alan W. Klimek, P-E.
Enclosures (General Permit NCA200000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Scotland County Health Department
Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Scotland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File NCA283014
Permit File AWS830014
NDPU Files

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
April 9, 2003
T. G. Gibson; III_
T. G. Gibson
PO Box 165
Gibson NC 28343
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. NCA283014
T. G. Gibson
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Scotland County
Dear T. G. Gibson, III:
On March 14, 2003, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued an NPDES General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued to enable swine facilities in North Carolina to
obtain coverage under a single permit that addresses both State and Federal requirements.
In accordance with your application received on February 20, 2003, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to T. G. Gibson, III, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with NPDES General
Permit NCA200000. The issuance of this COC supersedes and terminates your COC Number
AWS830014 to operate under State Non -Discharge Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the T. G. Gibson, located in Scotland County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than an annual average of 4320 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to
Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary, they may
be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4
gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 1, 2007. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed General Permit. Since this is a new joint State and
Federal general permit it contains many new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained
in the current State general permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this mmvt. The Devices to Automaticallv Stop Irrieation Events Form
must be returned to the Division of Water Quality no later than „120 days following receipt of the
Certificate of Coverage. The Animal Facility Annual Certification Form must be completed and returned
to the Division of Water Quality by no later than March 1st of each year.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
=`A
1VCUENR
Internet httpl/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Annual acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report for your waste management facility.
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Yield
Lbs. N
Acres
Lbs. N
Month
No.
No.
Type
Code
/Acre
/Unit
Used
Apply
28
1
GdB
C
6
50/T
4.75
1425
Mar -Oct
28
2
GdB
C
6
50/T
4.7
1410
Mar -Oct
28
3
GdB
C
6
50/T
6.0
1800
Mar -Oct
28
4
KnA
C
5.5
50/T
3.2
880
Mar -Oct
28
5
GdB
C
6
50/T
5.14
1542
Mar -Oct
28
6
GdB
C
6
50/T
5.0
1500
Mar -Oct
28
7
GdB
C
6
50 T
4.7
1410
Mar -Oct
Total:
33.5 -
9967
OVERSEED
28
1
GdB
L
na
50/AC
4.75
238
Sep -Mar
28
2
GdB
L
na
50/AC
4.7
235
Sep -Mar
28
3
GdB
L
na
50/AC
6.0
3.00
Sep -Mar
28
4
KnA
L
na
SO/AC
3.2
160
Sep -Mar
28
5
GdB
L
na
50/AC'
5.14.
257
Sep -Mar
28
6
GdB
L
na
50/AC
5.0
250
Sep -Mar
28
7
GdB
L
na
50/AC
4.7
235
Sep -Mar
Total:
33.5 1675
Overall Total: 67.0 11,642
Available Nitrogen (includes commercial): 9,936
--------------------------------------------------------
Surplus or Deficit :-1706
Crop Codes: Crop -unit
----------------------
B=Bermudagrass(hay)-tons
L=Small grain(hay)-acre
This Waste utilization Plan has been amended by Bert Coffer
(certified Technical Specialist-NCCES) on November 9, 1999 to
account for.changes in acreage available due to Wettable Acres
determination. Small grain overseed has also been -added -to this
plan since the original writing. Nitrogen can be applied at the
rate of 50 lbs on N per acre during the indicated application
window. The overseeded small grain must be harvested for hay
before seedhead formation. a
Amended by Date [ !
Affiliation: North Carolina Cooperative Ext.
Scotland Co. Center
231 E. Cronly St. Suite 800
Laurinburg, NC. 28352
910-277-2422

T.G. Gibson Swine Farm Irrigation Layout
Using a Nelson 150SR GUN with a 1.34" ring @ 90 psi
270 degree gun arc, 201 GPM
Using 90% of chart wetted diameter (315 x .90), as required by
"wettable acre" rule, the wetted diameter is 284 ft_, therefore
lane .spacing is 700-. of wetted dia. (284 x .70) = 200 ft.
Lane Spacing: 200 ft.
To keep from spraying into woods and to maintain 50 ft buffer from
perennial streams and 100 ft buffer from wells: gun cart should
start and stop 140 ft. from field edges and 190 feet from streams
and 240 ft from wells.
To apply .5" travel speed should be 3.2 ft/min
At the above settings the precipitation rate will be _51"/hour

Wettable Acres Determination Certification
Name of Facility: T. G G b so yr L iVe-sk-Oc_ Facility Number:$_-_1
Owner(s) Name: T G . G 16 s a ir,, = Phone No: 15�'3 -ZGS- LM71
Mailing Address: P v • 66 x ) 6S G'► sb ti` �V . C . Z 8 3 L-F 3
By signing this form, the facility owner and Technical Specialist acknowledge the completion of the
Wettable Acres Determination. All necessary Wettable Acre Determination Field Data Sheets and
calculations were completed to conduct a Wettable Acre Determination. The facility's Waste
Utilization Plan has been amended as necessary to reflect actual wetted acreage. A copy of all
worksheets, calculations, and other Wettable Acres Determination documents, along with the
applicable Waste Utilization Plan and Wettable Acre Determination Certification will be filed with
the local Soil and Water Conservation District. A copy will also be kept on site with the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan. Any future modifications must be approved by a technical
specialist and filed with the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. If any
modifications to the existing irrigation system or any new irrigation equipment was required to
adequately address the waste management needs of this facility, an Irrigation Specialist or
Professional Engineer has certified the design and installation below.
Owner Name:
Owner Signature: a �? ?•^- Date:_A: 7f9?
Technical Specialist
Technical Specialist Signature:
If assisted by an Irrigation Specialist or Professional Engineer please read and sign below:
Animal waste application equipment has been desig ed or modified to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan and according to NRCS Standards. Animal waste
application equipment has been installed according to NRCS Standards and is ready for use.
Irrigation Specialist/PE Name:
Irrigation Specialist/PE Signature: Date:`
Submit this form to:
Attn: Sonya Avant
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
WADC - 7/99

Irrigated Acreage Determination Procedures
for Wastewater Application Equipment
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET*
1. Make and model number H yy'4 '65 r d lo3o
2. Hose length 9 65 [feet] and hose inside diameter (ID) 3.4V [inch]
3- Gun make and model number 1 So s „y
4- Gun nozzle size 139 �- + [inch], ring orifice, taper bore orifice
5. Gun arc angle [degrees]
6. Travel lane spacing — ,00 [feet]. Indicate whether uniform or ✓ random.
Number of exterior hydrants r Number of interior hydrants
7. Gun wetted diameter �230 [feet]. measured or ✓based on gun chart.
8. Gun pressure [psi] r- observed at working gauge,
determined from gun charts, calculated (show calculations)
**9. Operating pressure at hose reel [psi]. observed at working gauge or
provided by owner.
**10. Supply line size [inch] (from pump to last hydrant)
*`11. Supply line length feet (maximum pumping distance)
**12. Supply line type PVC or aluminum
** 13. Pump make and model number
**14. Pump capacity [gpm]
**15. Engine make and model number _
or
**16. Electric motor horsepower and rpm [hp] [rpm]
Note: It is strongly recommended that you field determine wetted diameter and operating
pressure at the reel and gun.
' Locate each hydrant on a copy of the map. Indicate the start and stop of the sprinkler cart
for each travel lane and show the distance traveled_ Show the location of the supply line.
Irrigated acres are determined by the travel lane.
** Optional data, famish where possible.
*** Information furnished by
and/or &'--V a,�'
Signature of owner or facWty representative Signature of rechnJiWiledalist
i W le, -,b r% r�
Printed name of owner or facility representative Printed name of technical spedalist
Date f,pl� Date _ � ! M
�^
** Only the person or people collecting the data should sign the Field Data Worksheet.
C

(Multiple worksheets may be needed)
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
I. Farm number (identification) Field number (identification)
J__-
2_ Irrigation system designation ✓Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes 1 # Exterior lanes feet] Length of pull(LI)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(1-3)
4. Wetted diameter %2y [feet] from Field Data Worlsheet
5. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] jas a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout ✓ Multiple hydrants Single hydrant _ Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. _
Travel lane length (L_) Interior or P atExterior (lane/hydrant) _
,bq (a) Acres start end of pull from TableColumn
3�- (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1)
[Puii lengthE`i`f [feet] X Wetted width ;W jfeet]j / 43,560
Z� (c) Acres stop end of pull from Tabler5 c Column i�
Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L-) Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2)
Wull length jfeet] X Wetted width [feet]j"/ 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column T
Total acres for travel lane length (12) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (1.3)
{Pull length [feet] X Wetted width ffeet]) / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane Iength (I.3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
`{ 7� (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X —L—# Lanes = ` j S Acres
(b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X # Lanes = Acres
(c) Acres per travel lane length (1-3) X # Lanes = Acres
Lj'-15- Total CA'WMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Date:
Signature of techn speciaiist
rs

(Multiple worksheets may be iiceded) HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm number (identification) Field number (identification) 2
2. Irrigation system designation ✓ Existing irrigation system New/ irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes_ _ # Interior lanes j # Exterior lanes E 'Sc: feet] Length of pull(L1)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter .)05 U [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
S. Spacing 2Q0 Hydrant spacing [feet] I i [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout -"-Multiple hydrants Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L) -Interior.or Exterior (iane/hydrant)
,loc( (a) Ades start end of pull from Table Column
3 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll)
{Pull length��O [feet] X Wetted width ?,q0 feeet]) / 43,560
.� (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
C f �� ^ 7� Total acres for travel lane length (Li) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel Ianie length (L, Interior or _Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2)
{Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table _ Column
Total acres for travel lane length (12) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (Ij interior or _Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (13)
(Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
y• (a) Acres oer travel lane length (L1) X i # Lanes = Li 3Acres
(b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X # Lanes = . . Acres
(c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes - Acres
`"I • r-70 Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 80
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by. Date: L p
Signature of ical specialist
IS

(Multiple worksheets may be needed)
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
1. Farm number (identification) Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation ✓ Existing irrigation system — New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes �_Y n Exterior lanes `�,i`J feet) Length of pull(LI)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes (feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes (feet) Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
S. Spacing ?,CEO Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants Single hydrant fFxcessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattem, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L-) Interior or Exterior Qane/hydrant)
,S °7 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table � r Column V_
.5 ! (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll)
(Pull length`L- j [feet] X Wetted width Z54 [feet]) / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table I��'t' Column r
Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (1-2)
fPuU length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]] / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane Iength (L_) Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle. portion of pull (13)
[Pull length � [feet] X Wetted width [feet]l / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
6.0 (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X �L Lanes = 6 Acres
(b) Ades per travel lane length (1-2) X # Lanes = Acres
(c) Acres per travel lane length (1-3) X # Lanes - _ Acres
6 , 0 Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Date:
9 ., Jqq
Signature of t icai specialist
. rs

(Multiple worksheets mati• be needed)
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
l . Farm number (identification) Field number (identification) Lj
2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes 1 # Exterior lanes feet] Length of pull(L1)
Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2)
# interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter' [feet] from Field Data Work -sheet
S. Spacing ECG Hydrant spacing [feet] 7 1 [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants Single hydrant _ Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L)) interior or V Exterior-(lane/hydrant) _
Oq (a) Acres start end of pull from Table �Column '5
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (LI)
{Pull length !U [feet] X Wetted width �j [feet]] / 43,560 .
�� (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table;~ F7D Column j�T-
`3.2- Total acres for travel lane Iength (Ll) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2)
{Poll length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,S60
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L-) Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of puII from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3)
(Pull lengthy (feet] X Wetted width [feed) / 43,560
(c) Ades stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (13) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
3 • Z (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X # Lanes = Acres
(b) Acres per travel lane length (12) X # Lanes = Acres
__ (c) Acres per travel lane length (1-3) X # Lanes = _ Acres
3 , 2-Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8h + 8c) p g
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Date:
Signature of tech al specialist
IS

(Multiple worksheets may be needed)
HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
f,.
1. Farm number (identification) Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation systeri designation i/Faisting irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes ri Interior lanes l # Exterior lanes E i feet] Length of pull(L1)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(1-2)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes (feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worlsheet
5. Spacing 2GC% Hydrant spacing [feet] � 1 [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout ✓Multiple hydrants _ Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (LD Interior or t/Exterior (lane/hydrant) _
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle_ portion of pull (L1)
{Pull length - �p [feet] X Wetted width A5-1- [feet]} / 43,560 4-
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table 70 Column f7
Total acres for. travel lane length (U) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lame length (L, Interior or zExterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (1.2)
[Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]} / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel Iane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane Iength (L—) Interior or _Exterior Qane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3)
{Pull length - [feet] X Wetted width [feet]] / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
(a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X 1 # Lanes = _ 5.1 Acres
(b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X # Lanes = Acres
(c) Acres per travel lane length (1.3) X # Lanes = Acres
• Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Date:
Signature oft nical specialist
15

(Nfuttiple worksileeLt may be needed) HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm number (identification) Field number (identification) [G�
2_ Irrigation system designation ✓Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes I # Exterior lanes ) - feet] Length of pull(L1)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] ]as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants Single hydrant _ Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (Li) Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) '7b
�_ (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll)
{Pull length [feet] X Wetted width �W [feet]] / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table J5 -10_ Column
S Total acres for travel lane length (L1) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2)
[Pull length. [feet] X Wetted width [feet]] 143,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L_) Interior or ___)Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (I3)
[Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (I3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
(a) Acres per travel lane length (LI) X _�# Lanes = s Acres
(b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X # Lanes = Acres
(c) Acres per travel lane length (1-3) X # Lanes - Acres
Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Date: I a?O
Signature of to ical specialist
rs

(Multiple worksheets may be needed)
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
1. Farm number (identification) Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation L-"Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system
3- Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes I # Exterior lanes feet] Length of pull(L1)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Wor}sheet
5- Spacing 0-60 Hydrant spacing [feet] D 1 [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout 1/Multiple-hydrants _ Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
�y (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column Column 0
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L 1)
(Pull length 6`6t0 [feet] X Wetted width c/C ffeet]) 143,560
a� (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table L F `� Column C
Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane Iength (L-) Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (I_.2)
J ull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]} / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from _ Table Column
Total. acres for travel lane length (U) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L_) Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (1.3)
[Pull length • [feet] X Wetted width -[feet))/ 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
______ Total acres for travel lane length (U) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
`7 (a) Aaes per travel lane Iength (M) X _ L- # Lanes = y 7 Acres
(b) Acres per travel lane length (12) X # Lanes = Acres
(c) Acres per travel lane length (13) X # Lanes = Acres
V ,2 Total CALYMP wettable acres for field (Suns: 8a + 8b + 8c) q
Wettable Acre Computational Worlsheet Completed by: Date: f
Signature ofithical specialist
rs

LX11111ff Q•2
TABLi, 2 - Tr-m eliJlg Irrign(loll C1t11 Settings
Ainl(c, Ainticl n,Jrl 'I'ytic n( l:gtll)urtcnf: APSLAo S : ! l m&k Kota �D. V► "'' N CASp^.. 0 60 SC GUA
Fieldth
wJ
11y,JniJNod
Tfarrl
Srxrd
(N,nh)
hPPlinlion
HAN
f;lo)
TRAVCLI,ANE
lill'rcdvt I?Irecllve
%V1J1rh(�f1 I.cota�rh(A
Welled
dirrneler
(reel
CQ UIPWNT S LI-1.1 NOS
Narih Optrtlbrl Opuillnt
Ulrmtter Preteur+ 1'1n3111e Arc
I1UIIC3 Onl(r i ped( ri
Cflnunrnit
�
2
�Petrlr�nt�2
2
s z
..
10
1
2
2 2
A A—
q ID
via
,� a'
t4 o
ISce nlirrchcd mrip.
2Show wmtnic enlrics fur Inch l+yrlrnrd Incnlion in cnch fir -Id.
3usc Ifrc fullowin nLhrevinhuns fitr vntinus nrr pollcros. F (full eirelc),'I Q (flrrcc (lunrlcrs),'IT ((u,o (birds), Il (hn(f chcic), T(Cuc 1I irrl), Q (one rfunrlcr).
Mrq Alto IISC rlr at CC Or Al C.
Nr(cs, NC

r-
nr
r�
r�
4T
rA
9
J
a
Lmidumic1011crilor Nna1c:
Aildrerl:
Trirphurlc:
I'rllll,!{ [ f�il;ld Sllccificntiuns
. uz111131T1J•l
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN I'ARAML'URS.
Cauu t�•;
11 rrlc;
1.11141
Vim+Ir
A pin u 11,nn1 If
Al.rlunnrr
Urr+LIr5t1e
of 1'1414,
($rrr-r)
Slant
('.S)
rterlrrnurr
Appllndaq
Itnit�
1141If
A1, a Innun
Applltatlalr
prrfrrl�ntlon
Crrlc3
inrIIrr
(:nrIurrtuh
0-2
so
6-0
1150
15ce Irllnchcrl ImIl1.
1 i'u1u! ficlll ecrcngc ni'u„is Iuplilcll 1111III:f nlcn:,
)NcfCr to II. l:. 111iCnliu,I (111i41r, i'icld 011kc'i'cclmicul C11i11c, Scctiuii II U, Annulll 11P111ica600 rlllisl ll01 crcccrl 11>c uCtonowic wli:3 for the suil mid aull llscd.
MCS, NC
jwu, 1?7G
0

State of North Carolina
Department. of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
{THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations,
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the
Division. Please review the information for completeness and make any corrections
which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please
complete 2s best as Do not leave any question unanswered.
App.i_ a�ia;:ate: q 7
I . RLQ UAKED ITUMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have inclWed the following required items by signing your initials in the spice pro;v efi neat to!!�"
rM
item.
AnDl1ca11#
= C
3 r* i
1. one cmnpleted and signed orivan and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
W9,
te rn
Waste Operations; v
T m
r rn
=rnC
2MV...
: -o copies of a general location map indicating th- , t f maa: ::e anil waste facilities d
3 CX
field locations where animal waste is disposed; r.
�E:!E
3. Two copies of the Certified Animal n' ste Management Plan (CAVIMP). If the facility does
-
not have a CAWIMP, one mint be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste cperadons.
AL INFORMATION:
1. F c.='s name: T. G. Gipson— - - -
2. Print land Owner's name: I G. QNi on. 3P.
3. Land Owner's Mailing addrts .
City: Gibson NC _ Zip:ALLIA ;
Tel�-abnne Number. 265-4221
4. County where farm is locate& Scodwd_
5. Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified):
5. Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
7. Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): i7SDA-MCS
Rl:�r%EgVED
JUIV 2 s 1997,
RA�MMLE
s .
FORM: AWO-G-E 2126/97 Page 1 of 3

YII. OF,*.RATION INFORMATION:
1. Farm No.:$3-14
2. Operation Description: Swinc g2c ation
Feeder to Finish
4320 - Certified Design Capacity `
Is- the .Dave information cannot? Odyes; 0 ao. If no, eonest bellow :;,g the design capu-:.y of a;:e facility
Swine No. of Animals Tvoe of,Povltry NO_of Animals L= Qf Calde No. of Animals
0 Wean =o Fc::: - - O Layer 0 Dairy
ate
0 Farrow to Wean (; ,.: ":it'._-y
0 Farrow to Fe. --der l#�: )
UD JC'
Zj
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow) 3 3
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: _ No. of AnimalsL 23. —
�M-.
3. Asrear: cleared and available for application: 53-00 -; Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP):
4 :.cumber of Lzgoons: _� ;Total Cad :, cry _ A'S/1S � � Cubic Feet (ft3) ro x M "c
= M3rn
Number of Storage Ponds: ; Tu:al C anac-'. ; ��i;: Feet {ft3) r, � �
5. Is animtl waste. being applied on any field which has subsurface drains? YER or N' O) tpli;a z ui::: ftne)x
6. !je sub;!_=sce drains present in the vicinity of or under the lagoon? YES or O (please circle one)
it V. APPLIC: L LINTS %CERTIFICATION-
1, A� , /+ .._ 'kl2nd Owrzr's .:»,,.. c::rA in quc, don L- :;, a°`-` • +t".
tlis :icaticn f r d54 _ _ !Farm name listed in ques---,,a."';
has xa TGVlewc s sy me-n.^_d i; ��G1ngle and complete to the oc i: �` m� kncV.l dge. I understand that if all rcqub part of *his
app;;-„`;--i are n4 o compacted and that if all requ;_*ed supporting informatooa, and attacbments a . not iucluded,.this implication package
will be returac t:, = as ncom !ete.
Signature •' �! a � _ L Date
MANAGER'S CERTIFICAT'Ir1N: (compici..^uly if ddrmnt from the t,and Owner)
i, (Manager's name listed in question II.6), attest tna: this
application for (Farm name listed in question ILI)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand tha if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature Date
THE COMPIEI'ED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
Na',RTH CAFE_'-Ll~:A n*=T_„ij-N OF WATF'k QUALITY
e.'A tER (11' :.:TY 6ECTiDN
1 ::,vij Tc ANP y'=GINEERING UNI1
_ :;i7Frrr. un : 295*:
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 2 of 3

I
be, State of North C�.xolina
)Ament of Environment, Health and Natural Resource
1,&,eby certifids that
Tj%,om,.qs Cto Gibson
hp..- skit the requlre-nen!3 f01- CCItif.lZa0cm mtabliisred by the Department
,Pursuant to North C%rol;*ia Ci. nera.' &aqzte 143.,215.74E as an
A!,dmal. WasteMarliagcment System Operator
DUU=r%
Division of Wkiter Quality
July 11, 1996
DATE ISSUED
Am& 1fiMkA"d11 AM A��,.j A':�'
I T

I
re
edpullth ICI I lkdl II ul tf lvllul ItI1(dI Ir,
Heaand Natural Resources ` • f
'r
Division of Environmental Management
A A&
James B. Hunt, 'Jr., Governor ' '
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary �--�
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.F., Director
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CERTIFICATION OF APPROVED ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR
NEW OR EXPANDED ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEk= SYSTEMS SERVING FEEDLOTS
In order to be deemed permitted by the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM), the ..,owner of any new or expanded animal :waste management' system
constructed after'Jahuary'110.1994 which it. designed to serve greater than or
equal to the animal ' populations listed below is required. to' submit a signed _
certification .form to DEM befora =the 'new animals are -stocked on the facia. tD
Pasture operations-are:exempt,from -the requirement to be certified.
100 head of catty
_.75 horses :. rrl
250 swine ,i '.: ,?d. C
sheep _
r*ic
.,.-30,000'birds'vith 'a liquid waste system
M3rn
The certification must be signed by the owner'cf the' feedlot (and -manager if
� C±CD
different from the owner) and by airy technical specialist designated by the Soil'- ; N
and Water- Conservation Commission pursuant to.15A NCAC 6F :0001-.0005:'"' A:
-�
technical specialist inust verify by an"on-site inspection'that all applicable
design and construction standards and specifications are met as installed and
that all applicable operation and -maintenance standards and specifications can
be met. _ ....
Although the actual number''of'animals at the facility may vary from time to time,
the design capacity of the waste handling system should be used to determine if _
a farm is subject to'.the certification requirement. - `For "example,' the waste
.if
system for a feedlot is designed' -to handle 300'hogs but'the average population
will be 200 hogs, then the waste management.systesa requires &'certification...
This certification is'required by regulations governing animal Masts management..
syste:gs adopted by'the Environmental Management Commission (EMC).on December 10,.
1992 (Title 1SA NCAC 2H .0217).
r'.
On the reverse side of'this'page" is the certification form' -.which must be
submitted -to' DEM before on '
new anitsals are stocked the farm(.' Assisi. tance nw
W
completing the form can be obtained from one of the local agricultural agencies>
a .J U
such as the soil and water conservation district, the USDA -Soil Conservations
Service, or the N.C. Cooperative Extension Service. The form should be.sent to:Lu
'n WlL
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
ilC3
Division of Environmental Management -"
-LU
Water Quality Section, Planning Branch
P.O. Box 29535
LL
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535
Phone: [phone].-'
Steve W. 'Tedder' Chief .
Water Quality Section
Form ID: ACNEW0194 Date:
P.O. Sox 29535. Rcleigh. North Carolin o 27626-0535
An Equal Opportunity A*mctive Action Employer
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50%recycle d/ 10%past-con3umer pcper

ANniAL WMTZ M=AGMCMHTIPLAN CRRTIPICATYOH ron MW OR =YANDRD rEHDLOTs
Please return the cc=pleted form to the Division of Havirommantal Xanagement at
the addrers:cn•theereverse-aid& of this fora.
Name offarm (Please rint) : T. G. Gibson
.Address:
Phone No.: 765-
�,, Countyy • Scotland.
Farm location: Latitude and '_Longitude_:aA°&I'-��$"/ (required)-.__ _Also,
please attach- a copy. of .a county road map with.l�cation identified.
Type of operation (swine; ,-layer. dairy; -etc.): wine
Design capacity (number of animals):_ _
Average size of operation'(12 month population ayg.): 53
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres):
a=aaaaaaa=asaaQaaaaassasaaaaaaamaaaaaamaaaaman aaaaaaaasaa aaasaissaanil aaamaainman.
Technical, Specialist Certification -
As a .technical specialist designated :by the iNorth Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify -that the new or
expanded, animal waste,, management system as. installed for the farm named above
has :an animal waste management, plan that meets the ''design; construction,
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001--0005. The following e7.ements and their corresponding 'minimum
criteria - have been verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers)='°liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; -adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party); access
or ow'nership.4of proper I waste :application • equipment; schedule for :timing 'of
applicakions ;,,application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge:
of pollutants .from stormwater :runoff events less severe -than the•25-year; .24-hour
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print) :�Ed u. 211aand
Affiliation: Natural Resources Conservation bervice
Address (Agen Phone No. 7
Signature: r r Date: VZ.6L
a�=aaasea��aapaaaaas=aaAasaa;asaa aaaaaaaaaa:wasaaAasaaa�aafaaaYraraasaasa
Owner/iiaaager Agreement
I (we) understaiid'the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures ... -• •I (we) ' know that any additional expansion -to: the' existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction'af new:
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance: or through
runoff `.From a storm event .less severe, . than the 25-year, 24-hour storm.: --The
approvedplan will be filed -at the ,farm and at the office of the local'Soil and '
Water Conservation, District_.; .
Name of'Land Owner (Please'Print):
Signature- Date:
Name of HaaaQer, if different from owner (Please print):!,
Signature:_ Date:
Nate: A change -in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan, is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer.
DELI USE ONLY:ACNEW#

T. G. Gibson
P. 0. Box 165
Gibson, NC 28343
1
This Waste Management Plan is based on estimates of the amount
of lagoon liquid generated by the number of animals on this farm.
With Finishing houses the following assumptions are made:
1. Animals will be in your houses 333 days out of the year.
2. Average live weight per animal is 135 pounds.
Lagoon liquid is a combination of :
1. Manure and urine -- 450 gal/head/year,
2. Excess fresh water - 300 gal/head/year,
3. Lagoon surface rain surplus - 175 gal/head/year.
The total is 925 gallons per head per year. The number of
animals in six houses on your farm will be 6 x 720=4,320 head.
4,320 x 925 gal/head/year = 3,996,000 gallons divided by 27,154 to
get acre inches/year. This yields 147 acres -inches per year.
The actual amount will be dependent on the amount of fresh
water used; lagoon size, surface area, and local climate.
The amount of nitrogen present in the 147 acre inches is also
estimated from a table of average concentrations of nutrients in
finishing floor lagoons. It is estimated that there is 68 pounds
of tQtai nitrogen in an anaerobic lagoon per acre -inch.
nie. L1bje
147 acre -inches x 68 pounds of nitrogen per acre -inch= 9996
pounds of nitrogen available per 147 acre -inches.
Estimated Nutrient Availability in Pounds per acre -inch of
anaerobic lagoon liquid
N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Na Fe Mn B Mo Zn Cu '
68 37 93 25.5 8.3 10 58 2.4 .34 .18 .0045 1.5 .3
This nutrient management plan is designed to apply only as
much nitrogen as the crop can utilize. Since this plan maximizes
the amount of lagoon liquid that can be applied based on nitrogen,
other nutrients may be over applied.
There are 3 fields on this farm that can be utilized for
applying swine effluent. Some of the acreage in these fields
cannot be utilized by a traveling gun because of ditches and the
odd shapes of the fields (Map 1).

2
It is recommended that ditches be cleared as shown in Map 2.
This will allow approximately 53 acres of cleared land. The yellow
area on Map 2 is considered wetlands and should not be cleared
without approval of the Corps of Engineers.
An irrigation engineer should be consulted to determine the
proper clearing widths for the irrigation system that will be
purchased.
When the ditches are cleared and planted to bermuda grass, it
will be important not to apply waste while there is standing water
in the ditches. Waste must not move into the perennial waters as
defined by a solid blue line on the most recent version of the U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS) 1:24,000 (75 minute) scale topographical
map (Map 3).
The soil types on this farm are Kenansville (KnA), Gilead
(GdB) and Lakeland (LkB) (Map 4). Eight acres are LkB and seven
are KnA. The remaining 38 after clearing the ditches is GdB. The
Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly S.C.S.) yield data
for LkB is 4.5 tons of hay and 3.375 tons of improved bermuda grass
for grazing. Yields on KnA are 5.5 for hay and 4.125 grazing.
Yields on GdB are 6.0 hay and 4.5 grazing. Yields on fields grazed
are reduced 25% to account for recycling of nutrients.
Nitrogen Removed forvarious Soil Types and Acreage for _Hay
Yield (Tons) Nitrogen Removed/Acre X Acreage =Total
Gilead (GdB) 6.0 300 38 U400
Lakeland (LkB) 4.5 225 8 1800
Kennansville(KnA) 5.5 275 7 1925
53 15125
Nitrogen Removed for various Soil Types and Acreage for Grazing
Yield(Tons) Nitrogen Removed/Acre X Acreage= Total
Gilead (GdB) 4.5 225 38 8550
Lakeland (LkB) 3.375 169 8 1350
Kennansville(KnA)4.125 206 7 1444
53 11,344

3
The amount of nitrogen utilized by 53 acres of improved
bermudagrass for grazing is 11,344 pounds. The amount of nitrogen
generated by the animals on this farm is 9,996. This leaves a
deficit of 1,348 pounds of nitrogen that roust be applied as
commercial nitrogen.
The Gilead and Kennansville soil types on this farm can
utilize 8,550 and 1,444 pounds of nitrogen, respectively. The 45
acres in these two soil types utilize 9,994 pounds of nitrogen or
the equivalent of the total amount of nitrogen generated by the
animals.
Recommended Application Rates .for Grazing
on the Gilead (GdB) soil type 225 lbs. of nitrogen are removed
per acre divided by the 68 pounds of nitrogen in an acre inch
equals 3.3 inches that could be applied to this soil type. In
order to properly utilize these nutrients, an application of 1.1
inches in April, June, and August is suggested (See Figure 1
Relative growth rates for forage crops).
Applications should not be made to saturated soils.
Applications should not be made at rates higher than the
infiltration rate of the soil. The infiltration rate for Gilead
is .35 inches per hour with vegetative cover. Ideally slightly
less effluent should be applied to a Kennansville soil. Three
inches per year or 1" per application. The infiltration rate for
this soil type is .6 inches per hour.
on a Lakeland soil a total of 2.5 inches should be applied or
3 applications of .83 inches per acre equals 69 pounds of nitrogen
per acre. The infiltration rate for a Lakeland soil is .75 inches
per hour.
Pounds of nutrients --applied in 3.3 _inches of effluent
minus pounds of nutrients removed on a Gilead.(Gdb) soil
N P205
K2O
Ca
Mg
S
Cu
Mn
Zn
225 122
307
84
27
33
.99
1.12
4.95
-225 -52
-144
-27
-18
-18
-.01
-.36
.27
0 70
113
57
9
15
.98
.76'
4.68
The surplus amounts of nutrients applied are shown on the
bottom line of the table. The primary nutrient that may be
regulated in the future is P205 in the nutrient sensitive
watersheds. This nutrient in currently not a problem in the
watersheds in which this farm lies.

0
The other nutrients that may eventually build up in the soil
to cause agronomic problems for the bermudagrass are zinc and
possibly copper. These nutrients are relatively low according to
the soil tests so this does not present an immediate problem.
The amount of nitrogen utilized by 53 acres of improved
bermudagrass for hay is 15,125 pounds. The amount of nitrogen
generated by the animals is 9996. This leaves a deficit of 5,129
pounds of nitrogen that must be applied as commercial. nitrogen.
33.5 acres of Gilead (GdB) soil type in improved bermudagrass for
hay is necessary to properly utilize the nitrogen produced by the
animals.
Recommended Application Rates for Haying
On the Gilead soil type 300 pounds of nitrogen are removed per
acre divided by the 68 pounds of nitrogen in an acre inch equals
4.4 inches that could be applied to this soil type per acre. To
properly utilize these nutrients an application of 1.5 inches is
recommended in April, June, and August (See Figure 1, Relative
Growth rates for Forage Crops).
N P205
K2O
Ca
Mg
S
Cu
Mn
Zn
300 163
409
112
36
44
1.3
1.48
6.5
:-300 -69
-258
-36
-24
-24
-.015
-.48
.4
0 94
151
76
12
20
1.3
1.0
6.1

5
it is recommended that since this plan is based on estimates
of effluent and concentrations of nutrients in the effluent that
you test the lagoon for actual nutrient concentration.
Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on the end of a 10-
15 foot long pole. Extend the bottle 10--15 feet away from the bank
edge. Brush away any floating scum or debris so it is not
collected with sample. Submerge the bottle within 1 foot of the
liquid surface. Repeat at approximately 5 locations around the
lagoon, place into a plastic bucket, thoroughly mix, and empty 1/2
pint into sample container.
Place the sample into a flexible or expandable container that
can be sealed. The container should be rinsed clean with water and
free of any residues but should not be chlorinated or treated. The
sample should be cooled, or transferred to the lab immediately.
The NCDA laboratory will analyze the sample for a nominal fee.
Applications of effluent should be based on this sample not
on this plan, since these numbers are averages and may not
represent the true nutrient content of your effluent. Annual
sampling of the effluent and soil is recommended before any
application of the effluent to the crop. Effluent must be applied
to a growing crop or less than 30 days before a crop is planted.
Actual yield data should also be kept to determine if the
realistic yields per acre of the Natural Resources Conservation
Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) are accurate and truly
represent the yields for the soil types on your farm.
Plan prepared by David Morrison, CES, Technical Specialist

L"
APPENDIX
1. Map 1 ASCS Aerial Photo
2. Map 2 ASCS Aerial Photo - Suggested Clearing
3. Map 3 USGS Topo Map
4. Map 4 Soil survey Aerial Photo
5. SCS Soil Interpretation Record Gilead, Kennansville, Lakeland
6. Figure 1 -- Relative growth rates for forage crops.
7. Soil Test Report - 1994

I
W--lnl'-,ii"rAl%,

�Vl
`i_.ce
7 _i, Ne r
.1.,
T
fa
iL
4-T
jc-4
tZ�
hp
.......... .........
f- r %
Wr
N-It
71 r 't
.A,
ClIX
-4,v. . I ....% -OK
Fti;
je
x14 :f
r! 4
4j
wlp
VI X-1 -9
A, VJw. w, "k.­ 7 Pr&
Arm'.,
.­4 'e. mr••
/Jlr44 .1 . iv;� i �; —
v 40&, �-w" *M..
kl ."MAW.
VIt. --p Z.,
A,

Hw T
V
it
r !' '': "'~ '''"'y�� 6�� t � � Vim• �
II _{1 �nsRsn • V !" V.1
RwRCII j� ••Cl• O � V �
1, n'
%14 •!� C`! I •14
om
�• � � 40 (\ II .p ` • �a� � a=crux. � _�' / �S'
III ry I�• �il I i' i4{ i'II'' irf I 0 1! tii '. ��. s4 a` . �+, / +r/
41I
I{I'�E Iir��I I�I �•��II I{ilE ��I�r�ll 1��� � �e4 ��� ^ (� � �+
'1\ '!�'� I ilrl I ill I{'II IIAr {� I { ��' ''! • VI • •'i
�'a' .N I II iil I. , � rl I I ..'�I I �:� 'll I �'� � � `` • e I / n ,;,
�I' illl I I I II LEI I �I I III �il p 4µ�,1 lil u
I I I i i i,l ' j'n l {jl 1
41 rl{Ire III+'II IIIi;1 �lil lrl l ILTI{� • �q I� J l p14.&r..
I4 i;IE jiEl ii'�I E,jl I, I �€' I,tll II lifll 11. 11 �I u 1 I �s I i I
l'. E
��1 �` i ny U • I
. ool r d aG
IL Y •//y '� . O
Il ,' � •
II u
j h � •II + ,
I. Vy 1 V
ON

5.
•
$OI L INTEAPAETATI ONS ACCORD GILEAOSERIES
CAPABILITY AND REALISTIC YIELDS PEA ACAC OF CROPS AM PASTUQE (FOR NOTRIEKT MANAGf}7M PLANS)
I CLASS-
I C"A- ITOaACCO YARN ISOYBEANS
ICOTTON
IPfANUTS
ITALL JWWVED I
I WTERNINING
I GILITY I I I
ILINT
I
IFESCUE famccAwmi
I PHASE
I !(Las) I(ou) 1(au)
I
I(LSS)
I(Las)
I(Tom/ACRE)1(TDNs/ACRE)1
I
I
I
INIARIIRR.INIRR JIRR. INIRR JIRO. INIRA IIRR. INIRR IIRR.
!
INIRR IIAR. I NAY IG.AACEI HAT JGRAyEJ
I
19-=
I- n+ 'r 12200 1 1 as i 1 u 1
I� 1
12400 I
! 3.8 J 3.2 J 6.4 j 5.1 I
12-"
r_ 1 7C' I IZ200 1 1 73 1 1 35 1
1 5513 1
12400 1
1 1 1 1 1
1"0%
I ,e I 11640 1 1 sb 1 1 30 1
1 SOO 1
12000 1
1 1 f 1 1
!IG-In
I 6E I I I I I I f
I I
I I
I ! f I I
I
f
1 6E
1 ! I I ! I I 1
1 r
I I
I I I ) I
I
) 1 1 1 I I I I
1 I ! I 1 I I !
I !
I I
! r
I 1
I 1 1 I I
I r ! 1 !
f
I
I
r ! 1 I 1 1 1 I
I I I t I I I !
I I 1 I I ) 1 !
I I
I 1
I I
I I
r 1
! I
) ! I I 1
I 1 1 I I
I I I I !
FFL0001
DETERMINING
PHASE
SOIL INTERPRETATIONS RECORD
KENANSYILLE SERIES
CAPABILITY ANO REALISTIC YIELDS PER ACRE OF CROPS AND PASTURE (FOR NUTRIENT KAXAC AEHT PLANS)
l
SOIL INTERPRETATIONS RECORD
LAKELAND SERIES
CAPABILITY AND REALISTIC YIELDS PER ACRE OF CROPS AND PASTURE (FOR NUTRIENT HANAGE14E.NT PLANS)
BILiTY I (HU) ,(BU) �(LBS) I (LBS) l(TEO SODAGRS/ }�{BU)
6S
7S
BE

Sorghum -Sudan/ I
001
111�f1�
Jut Fah Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc
Figure 1
Relative growth rates for forage crops (Ibs/acrleffday)
7-4.1

e,.-- I r—v a s Ia—. VO a 4 r.lune: (bltrl /J3.16y5
REPORT N0•14310 AGRONOMIC DIVISION, N.C, DEFT, OF AGRICULTURE
4300 REEDY CREEK ROAD
12 / 1319 4 RALEIGH, N.C. 27607.6455 COPIES SENT TO:
X COUNTY EXTENSION DIRECTOR
TO;GIBSON III, T. G.
PO BOX 165
LAURINBURG NC 28343—
FARM LOCATION (COUNTY);
SC07LAND
SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS
13Ba
FIELD INFORMATION
TEST RESULTS'.'.w:•;1
SAMPLE
NO.
PRENous CROP
APPLIED LIME
FERT, LAST CROP
SOIL
CLASS
HM-%
WN,
CEC
88•%
Aa
PN
PSI
Ka A
'a:i'
Cr%
, Mp•%
MI1-I
Zn•I
Cua
8.1
SSA
NO H
HM N
H.
!A
P30a x0
.. ..�
+.y'.:I,
',g;
.t:
,.
.1.
R::.
,..
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR FIRST CROP OR YEAR
SUGGESTED TRIEATMENT FOR SECOND CROP OR YEAR "
CROP TO BE GROWN
LIME N
PIOa
AIO
up
Cis
to
11
Iln
BEE
CROP 700E CROWN
LINE
N
PIOs
ISO
up
Cu
Z.
a
Yn
SEE
NOTa
HOTS
ERN HA/PAS E
1.17 60-8a
10-030
Oo-! 0
a
3
•RH He A
f
_
FIELD INFORMATION
TEST RESULTS''•,-
BAMPLE pREYl0U3 CROP
No.APPLIED
LIME
FEAT. LAST CROP
BOIL
,•CLASS'
N4%
Wfy'
I'
CEC
B&%
AC
pH
P-I
Ka
G•%
- Mp•%'
,,,i
ZM
Cul
SI
S9-I
NON
.,]
Me.
Yr.
IA
PxDe KID
.•
ii:
a 4 0)
...
ai
--•2
IN
a.7 .
4
!.
4
9
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR
FIRST CROP OR YEAR '•
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR SECOND CROP OR YEAR "
CAOP TO BE GROWN
LII,IE
N
P10a
KO
MO
Cu
Zn
a
Mn
SEE
COOP TOP[ GROWN
LINE
N
Pz0/ K=O
Mp
C� 2n P
Mn
SEE
L
NOTE
NOTE
ERM HA/PAS E
1.1T
60-BG
)0-020
70-0 a
O
ERM HA/PAS1t
-
Gfs
C _0
FIELD INFORMATION TEST RESULTS _if LjA
$AM/LE PREVIOUS CROP
NO
A►PLI€D UME
BOIL
., CLASS
FEAT, N-11
NM %-
wry
-CEC
SS-%
Ae
pH P I
K I
G-%
Mp-%
MrvI
1M CaJ
S-1
€Si
NON HH H N.
1 •
A1o,
Yr.
UA
PIG/
C66
--3
MIN
006
.33
5'7
72
.G
4
4
6
SUGGESTEO TREATMENT FOR FIRST CROP 4OR YEAR .•
ISUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR SECOND CROP tOR YEAR "
CROP IO OE GROWN
LIMEL60-"80
P'Q'
KIO
Me
Cis
Z.
9
Mn
SEE
CROPTOPSORDWN
LIME
N
1.101
NIOL-04c,
MO
Cu
Zn
B
Mn SEE
N07E
1-1(1-1
NOTE
BERM HA/PAS E
1047�40-060
90-100
0
0.
0
0
1
ER A PA
0-
;a
,.FIELD INFORMATION
TEST RESULTS '
SAMPLE
PAEYIOUS CROP
APPLIED UME
FERT-LAST CROP
��.
ae+K Aa
PH
Pi
K•I
G•%
Mp•%' MM
Zmi
CuJ
Bd.
Sa•INOIN
N �N
X.
NO
LLA01' .:
SUGGESTED TREATMENT, FOR FIRST CROP OR YEAR
" SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR SECOND CROP OR YEAR "
CROP IO SE CROWN
UMEFN
PIOs
KO
Ma
Cu
Zn
a
110
BEE CROP 760E GROWN
LIME
N
Pro$
KIO
MO
Cu
1r
B
Mn SEE
ROTE
NOTE
FIELD INFORMATION TEST RESULTS
SAMPLE
P""60USCROP APPLIED LIME
FERT. LAST CROP BqL
NM-%
.}YN
CEC
Pa-%
Aa
PH
P-1
K�l �G•% MP%
Mn-1
1M Cu-I
7.1
SSA
NOIH
NHeH
NF
H6.
Me. " lA
euee
P30a 24
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR
FIRST CROP OR YEAR " SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR SECOND CRpP JOR YEAR "
CROP TO BE CROWN
LIME
N P101
K70
MQ
Cu Zn
P
Mn I
SEE CROP TO BE OROwN
LIME
N
P103
KIO
Np
Cu
Zn
a
I
NOTE
7!j
' TEST RESULTS (N.C. tests wit) not compare directly to numbers obtained by other meth6ds.)
Sall Chia: hUH . Mineral
OS-%. as- Saturation, %al CEC
Mp•% . rtlagn"lun%- % 01 CEC
�IN .!thrall N, mpldm,
n
hFO. NHunhDrpanla
AO - Addlty, megr100 em•
' IWn4 Manpensso Inca
"IIH,N - Ammonlum N, moldml
•�
ORO. Orpanla::; ! .' n'
PH- Nyd"naaa Aalhrlty
ZA4. Mm index
He-Saalum,megrlo0cm-
HM•%. Urn le Manor. Percent by YeL
P•1. phoephms Index
Cu•I - Coppsr hda.
WN . Welpht per valume, Q'cm'
K•1 a Patasslurn Wee
9� . B0"ble Sulfur N%NR
CEC. Callon E.ch. Cap, m.y100 am•
G•%. Calclum, %of CEC _
854. soluble Bell LWex
'• TREATMENT, Ibsla unless specified
LIME: 7. lonsh, M. Iba11000 sq. R. KIO. Palish, M . Ib811 ON sq, 11. Zn . Zlnn
N. Nllropen, M. Iba.11000 sq. R. Mg Mapneelum a. apron
P101. Phosphite, M. Ib..l1000 sq. fl. Cu. CoPPar Mn.MAnp.n.-
Test Level is questionable. See supplemental material.
-4
READ SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL AND BACK OF REPORT FOR FURTHER DETAIL

lz�
&7-�■
10'O[f'1

UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources
Conservation
Service
Howard McAlister, Chairman
Scotland SWCD
Suite 400
231 East Cronly Street
Laurinburg, North Carolina 28352
Dear Mr. McAlister:
440 Caton Road
Lumberton NC 28358
Tel: [phone]
January 27, 1995
Attached is a copy of the Certification*of Approved Animal Waste
Management Plan for New or Expanded Waste Management Systems for
T. G. Gibson, Gibson, NC. This certification is for a 4320
feeder/finish operation.
For your review is a copy of the Waste Utilization Plan prepared
by David Morrison, CES, for this operation.
Yours truly,
Ed Hol and
District Conserva ionist

Environmental
Quality
MBJ Farms, LLC
MBJ Farm I
P. O. Box 535
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
Dear MBJ Farms, LLC:
A )1 d
I �E IT
MAr i s ; k
■ ` QRO4
MaM0,11"T PFrj0K+At OFFICE
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS830015
MBJ Farm 1
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Scotland County
In accordance with your Notification of Change of Ownership received March 5, 2018, we are hereby
forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to MBJ Farms, LLC, authorizing the operation
of the subject animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) for MBJ Farm 1, located in Scotland County, with a swine animal capacity of no greater than
the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder:'1,350 Other:
This COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2019, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS830015 dated October 1, 2014. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified
in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and
maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility.
Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals
authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and
must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit carefully. Please pay_careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record kMing forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional operations Seetion
1636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon,
storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC; the -General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Program for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition- II.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You may
find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Raleigh, NC National Weather
Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at: h ://www.weather. ov/rah/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office staff
may be reached at 910-433-3300. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General
Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Lin6 Culpepper
Interim Director, Division of Water Resources
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Scoiland County Health Department
Scotland County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files (Permit No. AWS830015)
Smithfield Hog Production

s
r
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste U
05-12-2004`
This plan has been prepared for:
T. G. Gibson Farm
T. G. Gibson, 111
P.O. Box 165
Gibson, NC 28343
843-265-4971
This plan has been
Dana L. Ashford
USDA-NRCS Laurinburg FO
231 East Cronly Street
Suite 400
Laurinburg, NC 28352-3820
910-277-2433
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
GENE©
JAN 2 9 2007
� F). cl7 LLEREGIONALOFHCE
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
"A" 7, z1a
Plan Approved By: ��4
Technical Specialist Signature
----------------------------------------------------------------------
498347 Database Version 3.1
Q 5 -12 Zao v
Date
Date Printed: 05-12-2004
Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 4,004,640 gals/year by a 4,320
animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 190 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
9224
Incorporated
15 840
Injected
17445
Irrigated
10026
Max. Avail.
PAN (Ibs) +
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
10,026
11642
-1,616
4,650,093
-645,453
------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-12-2004 Source Page Page 1 of I

Narrative
T.G. Gibson Farm WUP
Farm is a Feeder -Finish Swine operation with a capacity of 4320 animals.
The temporary storage capacity is 180 days.
The nitrogen removal per acre data was adjusted to meet the original WUP amounts,
from the WUP dated 6/8/1994.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --............................ -------....---------- ---------------------- --
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-12-2004 Narrative Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
28
Pull
4.75
4.75
10.0
Gilead
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bcnnudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
28
Pull2
4.70
4.70
10.0
Gilead
Small Grain Overseed
L0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
28
Pull3
6.00
6.00
10.0
Gilead
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
28
Pull4
3.20
3.20
20.0
Kenansville
Small Grain Overseed
1.0'rons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
28
Pul15
5.14
5.14
10.0
Gilead
Small Grain Oversecd
L0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
28
Pull6
5.001
5.00
10.0
Gilead
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
28
Pu117
4.70
4.70
10.0
Gilead
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: 33.49 33.49
LI
Potential'' hing
.....
` - Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
< 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<= 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the root
zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 5/12/2004
PCs Page Page 1 of I
NOTE: Symbol • means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Souroe
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbslA)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(IWA)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(IbslA)
Liquid
ManumA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gaVA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
28
Pulll
S7
Gilead
4.75
4.75
Small Grain Oversecd
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
94.97
0.00
28
1 Pu111
,.S7
Gilead
4.75
4.75
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
-3/1-9/30
*300
0
D
Irrig.
300
119.83
0.00
569.20
0.00
28
Pull2
S7
Gilead
4.70
4.70
Small Grain Oversecd
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
93,871
0.00
28
Pu112
S7
Gilead
4.70
4.70
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*300
0
0
brig.
30
119.93
0.00
563.21
0.00
28
NO
S7
Gilead
6.00
6.00
Smal] Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.0
119.83
0.00
28
Pul13
S7
Gilead
6.00
6.00
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*300
0
0
Irrig.
300
119.83
OM
718.99
0.00
28
Pul14
S7
Kenansville
3.20
3.20
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011 -3/3 1
50
0
D
brig.
50
19.97
0.00
63.91
0.00
28
Pul14
ST
Kenansville
3.20
3.20
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9130
*275
0
0
1Frig.
275
109.85
0.00
351.51
0.00
28
Pull5
S7
Gilead
5.14
5.14
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
102.66
0.00
28
Pu115
S7
Gilead
5.14
5.14
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*300
0
0
brig.
300
119.83
0.00
615.94
0.00
28
Pull6
S7
Gilead
5.00
5.00
Small Grain Overseed
LO Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
1997
0.00
99.86
0.00
28
Pu116
S7
Gilead
5.00
5.00
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*300
0
0
Irrig.
300
119.83
0.00
599.16
0.00
28
Pull7
S7
Gilead
4.70
4.70
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.0
93.87
0.00
28
Pu117
S7
Gilead
4.70
4.70
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
311 9/30
*30D
0
0
brig.
300
119.83
0.00
563.2 t
0.00
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/12/2004 WUT Page Page I oft

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
ReWd
(lbslA)
Comm.
Fcm '
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res,
(IbslA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbslA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
i000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
4,650.09
Em
Total Produced, I000 gallons
4,004.64
Balance, 1000 gallons
-645.45
TOW Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tom
jowl
0.00
Uance,tons
IINMI
0.00
Notes: 1-In the tract column, symbol means leased, otherwise, owned.
2. Symbol' means user entered data
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/12/2004 WUT Page Page 2 of 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a. rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive,7astewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
28
Pulll
Gilead
0.35
1.0
28
Pu112
Gilead
0.35
1.0
28
Pu113
Gilead
0.35
1.0
28
Pull4
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
28
Pu115
Gilead
0.35
1.0
28
Pu116
Gilead
0.35
1.0
28
Pu117
Gilead
0.35
1.0
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 5/12/2004 1AF Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol • means user entered data

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source,
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes,
phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
Ib/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gaYac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
54.16
108.31
162.47
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
27.08
54.16
81.24
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
50.77
101.55
152.32
- ........... ----------------------------------------- -- .......................... ...------ -------- -----.--------------------- ..................
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-12-2004 Sludge Page Page I of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a Value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the fast crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date 9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
64
1
2
48
1
3
138
l
4
144
1
5
149
1
6
155
1
7
160
1
8
165
i
9
180
1
10
161
1
11
143
1
12
118
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
--------------------------------------------------------- --------------- -------------------------------------- -----------------------
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-12-2004 Capacity Page Page I of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available Iand.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
b. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offske or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
.... ... --- ...........
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/12/2004 Specification Page

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
.............. .............................. ...................... -- ............ .......... - -.......... ---------------- ......
498347 Database Version 3A Date Printed: 5/12/2004 Specification Pape 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs; etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
----------------------- ---- ---- ..................................
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/12/2004 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): Pull 1, `Pu112, Pu113, Pu115, Pu116, Pu117
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Effective artificial drainage MUST be in place to achieve Realistic Yield Expectations
provided for these soils.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bulac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply prep lant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): Pu114
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts,
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
................. .............. ...................... ......----......... _- -------------------- ..............
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-12-2004 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 2

The following crop note applies to field(s): Pull I, Pul12, Pul13, Pui15, Pul16, Pul17
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): Pu114
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15 November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
-- ---- ---------------- --.................. -----------.---.----.--..... _- --- ............................... ....... ----..---- - -
498347 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-12-2004 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 2

map
- - `l I)
IL _` rr l.. _ rl _fit ` ♦ `` , / rf • f
' - ` '3L,
\ 7 i
{ -.__
_...._ ^ \
- n15 a _ J .
u```
•\
`\
+;,r
or•
.,6
., ;f -- `',r'
'' "aG
f 11 1
Z•.
`^
•4.1 1
,A 1
'"y^.'
(I/
, V\:
•
'•4
/ C :.,•
q d
\
l Q . ].,,
I `1' l 1 k ;at / i ' . I
--- 4,
'•P, r^"" h ,.
// i ' , ..`
,.y \ I ,..,

41 r " •
r , rr
9

, ` :I'
' } \ 1 @a \`\t \ , '
.r • 'lp 5V
11,
drJ4rii 1
+ % /
a p'a lil f ,.> r-
'n ;
` J ii• h. r
n : j
/ +c l
-\ '1 '
J r l,
l
/'
=-i `',. j
+14 r J

`4 - " •, l
! I
' i \.I
4s'9 ,1 •,h - If
Ir y
+ V
y, '•
,.✓ may'
y5
lJ \' `
/
-
• 1 a . `
<a ` _r- . ` `
•
..` .\rt\ I., y rf
lj/j _
'r p (Las .
' f r '/
v [
- I-' I r '' `
.
as , •
!/I I '1. n
//j/ i4 4
U tI` r' ` ! •'I +i,
\"
r
' %
I\`
''I, \",
\ J J_ } 11) f ! f I`
r w'.'L-i^ 1 ^
as \^' aaD,Sn

r! i
/;

\` \` .\ ', 'I
• \ _.
'-1 15.
` yy
1
••
y/>/
rr .. ' r1
I 'rr
If '^ . `/_„!r`f ' tl
r "

l I.
,rw
, /
7.
Ir
" '. ,
j 1 • r j Flrr 1 C -`—°
:F) ' `" :'rr--.
/N '% i' ry -
tom: ' ' f L ,
`._ l
i'
Ji
T
r J a `\` 1
U _ -
;1 •-
_
If
as
jS
- _. / I I --
//
9@ I r !_ .4
'f' F •• 1` 1 •\4 1
;' j
-_} -
,r..\-
-1. CID 1 V I =
1 11
,....
! \ ✓-- -1
-. 1 1
(
._ eaa¢l45
I
- i p7 I ,II r
_' _ I 'n 11 ,
°55
•, _ -
-
L "' ;, ;
''= r 1 "
:tii;,L/ .-.- ____
t
11 (J . ,,,_.. », ,a =tea Jti
! 4 •_
;Y
_
n I
` l \ \ '11 1l j II t
l d
[\ \ f I /"1:'7% Y z..` , 1\\ }l 1 `II _ • `+ 4G9 -4
, J; . I' i t-_ r'\,`. (1' • I'. - -
Yi ^- i
r_ !f 1
1
I I

N—mel,
IN, ylfi
"I th N- awr N .1.1
1,q) 47). 1 i . - Z, 3 W
--k
URPI'M .4
L I
. . s +y ti ti Y .r• • ' _ ;.+ T ti / ark •
VR r 0-4
L N,
V A
IA
I

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT and
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
`J Natural Resources SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Conservation Service N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633
(08128/03)
Prepared for: _ . &;VN<An E,rm F c►i1 _83-iy
By: Dana, AsbLy:d , (A 5 r)A - N IZCS
Fa6l- #
-FafffiTract: a Date: a5 / i 2- Zooy
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT?
The conservation practice, Nutrient
Management, is managing the amount,
source, placement, form and timing of the
application of nutrients and soil amendments
to achieve realistic production goals, while
minimizing nutrient movement to surface or
ground waters. The practice, Waste
Utilization, is using agricultural waste such as
manure or wastewater in an environmentally
sound manner. These practices are jointly
accomplished through the development of a
Nutrient Management/Waste Utilization Plan,
which is normally part of a broader
Conservation Plan that addresses multiple
natural resource concerns on the land.
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
and WASTE UTILIZATION PRACTICES
Your nutrient managementtwaste utilization
plan is intended to accomplish one or more of
the following objectives:
• To budget nutrients for plant production.
• To property utilize manure or organic by-
products as a plant nutrient source.
• To minimize the delivery of agricultural
nutrients to surface and ground water
resources.
• To maintain or improve the physical,
chemical, and biological condition of the
soil.
• To utilize agricultural wastes for livestock
feed or as an energy source.
CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT 1 WASTE UTILIZATION
PLAN
The information provided in this Job Sheet
and the attachments meet the minimum
requirements for a Nutrient Management Plan
for USDA-NRCS purposes. This Nutrient
Management Plan includes,
%4' A plan map and soils map for the area
planned (these may be part of the overall
Conservation Plan).
✓l. Location of designated sensitive areas or
resources (streams, wells, sinkholes, etc.)
and any associated nutrient application
setbacks, etc.
-3. Your planned crop rotation.
✓4. Results of soil, plant, water tests.(OtACW)
✓5. Results from Phosphorus Loss
Assessment Tool (P TUj )sae
index 1-4 as required. d
v6. Realistic yield expectations for the crops in
the rotation, and their source if other than
default values approved for N.C.
I. Recommended nutrient application rates
for nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium,
as well as timing, form, and method of
application and incorporation, if applicable.
A This Job Sheet (or comparable
information), that provides the following:
• General requirements of this practice,
as well as additional requirements to
meet the natural resource protection
purposes listed above.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633 (August 2003) page I

• Additional considerations specific to
this plan.
Operation and maintenance
information associated with this
practice.
Because this Nutrient Management Plan
includes agricultural organic sources,
additional items are required in the plan to
ensure proper waste utilization:
Waste Utilization Agreement (if
applicable)
Waste Utilization Third Party
Agreement (if applicable)
Additional engineering design and
operating information for waste storage
structures, transport, and application
system, as applicable. These designs,
and the instructions for operating these
structures, is an integral component of
your overall Nutrient Management/
Waste Utilization Plan.
Emergency Action Plan to prevent
overtopping or other discharges from
storage structures or facilities, as
applicable.
This plan was developed based on the current
NRCS 590 and 633 standards and Federal,
state, or local regulations or policies.
Changes in laws or regulations may
necessitate a revision of the plan.
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE
UTILIZATION
General
All manure and organic residues must be
applied according to a nutrient management
plan (see the following section, "BASIC
REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT')
You are required to acquire and comply with
all federal, state, or local permit requirements
related to the handling and application of
manure or organic materials.
The nutrient management/waste utilization
plan must address all organic waste
generated at or brought to the facility. A
Waste Utilization Third Party Agreement must
exist to address all organic waste not handled
by the nutrient management/waste utilization
plan.
;':
Manure or organic wastes will not be applied
to the following areas:
• surface waters,
• wetlands, unless constructed as a
component in a waste treatment system,
• soils subject to frequent flooding during
the period when flooding is expected,
• frozen, snow-covered, or saturated soils,
• within 200 feet of a dwelling other than
those owned by the producer,
• within 100 feet of a well,
• within 25 feet of surface waters, or
• within any other setbacks as identified by
federal, state, or local laws or regulations
(e.g. NC General Statute prevents swine
lagoon effluent from being applied within
75 feet of a residential property boundary
or perennial stream or river if the facility
was sited on or after October 1995.)
Manure or organic wastes will be applied in a
manner not to reach surface waters, wetlands
(unless constructed as a component in a
waste treatment system), property owned by
others, or public right-of-way.
Sludge that accumulates in waste storage
structures must be analyzed prior to land
application. Adequate provisions (available
land and/or third party manure agreements)
must exist to ensure sludge is applied in
adherence to all nutrient application
requirements. All federal and state guidance
regarding the proper testing, handling, .
planning, and application of sludge must be
followed for regulated operations.
Since compliance with all applicable North
Carolina laws is the responsibility of the
producer, you should consult the most current
version of the Guidance Memo for
Implementing the Environmental Management
Commission's Regulations for Animal Waste
Management for questions.
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
PROVIDING LIVESTOCK FEED
If applicable, all agricultural wastes or other
organic residues used for feedstock must be
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633 (August 2003) page 2

handled in a manner to minimize
contamination and preserve its feed value.
Chicken litter stored for this purpose must be
covered. A qualified animal nutritionist shall
develop rations that utilize animal wastes.
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
PROVIDING A SOURCE OF ENERGY
If your facility is to be used for energy
production, all energy producing components
of the system are included in the Nutrient
ManagementlWaste Utilization Plan and
provisions for the utilization of residues of
energy production identified. Your Nutrient
Management Plan includes the use of these
residues, if applicable.
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT
General
Application of nutrients must comply with all
applicable Federal, state, and local laws and
regulations.
The realistic yield expectations (RYEs) in this
plan are based on one or more of the
following:
• Default values approved by the N.C.
Interagency Nutrient Management
Committee that incorporate soil
productivity information, yield data, and
research with North Carolina soils, and
cropping systems. Additional information
on the default values may be found at:
www. soil. ncsu. edu1nnnjo1ncnmwaAndex.htm
Documented actual yield data from the
site, determined by the average of the
highest three yields of the last five
consecutive specific crop harvests. (For
forage crops, determine the average of the
highest three years of the last five years.)
A fertilization rate recommended by North
Carolina State University may be used in
cases where no yield data or approved
RYE values exist for a crop.
An RYE inferred from a similar crop on a
soil with similar physical and chemical
features may be used for new crops or in
the absence of other RYE data. This
inferred RYE may ONLY be specified by a
certified Nutrient Management planner.
Erasion, runoff, and water management
controls have been planned, as needed, on
fields that receive nutrients.
Soil Testing
This nutrient management plan has been
developed based on current soil test results
(no older than three years).
Soil samples must be collected and prepared
in accordance with North Carolina State
University or the North Carolina Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services
(NCDA&CS) Agronomic Division standards or
recommendations.
Soil test analyses can be performed by any
laboratory or program that is certified by the
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of
Water Quality, Laboratory Section.
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division uses the
Mehlich-3 extractant process for soil testing.
Growers who utilize other laboratories must
request the use of the Mehlich-3 methodology
to ensure the test results are compatible with
North Carolina's nutrient management
planning and assessment tools. For statewide
consistency, all laboratories used must
provide fertilization recommendations using
guidelines and methodologies as referenced
at the NCDACS website:
www. nca r. com/a ronomi/obook. him
Growers are encouraged to use a laboratory
that is supported by field research within the
state.
Soil testing shall include analysis for all
nutrients for which specific information is
needed to develop the nutrient plan.
Plant Tissue Testing
Tissue sampling and testing, when used, shall
be done in accordance with North Carolina
State University or NCDA&CS standards or
recommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633 (August 2003) page 3

Manure Testing
Nutrient values of manure and organic by-
products shall be established for planning
purposes based on laboratory analysis,
acceptable default values, or historic records
for the operation.
When determining actual application rates, a
laboratory analysis is required. State
regulations require that waste be tested within
60 days of utilization for some operations. In
the case of daily spreading, the waste must be
sampled and analyzed at least once a year.
Acceptable laboratories include the
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division, or others
certified by the NCDENR.
Field Risk Assessment
A field -specific assessment of the potential
for phosphorus transport from each field (or
groups of similar fields) have been conducted,
using the North Carolina Phosphorus Loss
Assessment Tool (PLAT).
PLAT assesses the potential for phosphorus
(P) to be transported from the site to surface
water through each of the four primary loss
pathways:
• sediment -bound P transported through
erosion,
• soluble P transported through surface
runoff,
• soluble P leached through the soil
profile, and
• non -incorporated source P transported
through surface runoff.
Based on the assessment of each loss
pathway, PLAT produces a single rating for
each field. As shown below, this rating will
identify whether nitrogen or phosphorus shall
be the rate -determining element in developing
the planned application rate for manure.
PLAT Rating
Nutrient Application Criteria
LOW
Nitrogen -based manure
application.
MEDIUM
Nitrogen -based manure
application.
HIGH
Manure application limited to
phosphorus removal from site
in harvested plant biomass.
VERY HIGH
No additional manure
application to be specified in
plan for the site.
On all sites, regardless of the PLAT rating,
starter fertilizers may be recommended in
accordance with NCSU guidelines or
recommendations.
In some cases, specific conservation practices
that reduce the potential for phosphorus
transport have been incorporated into PLAT.
Examples include buffers or filter strips,
ponds, water table management, and residue
management and conservation tillage.
Similarly, soil erosion rates, either existing or
planned, have been incorporated into your
PLAT analysis. This information is shown on
the PLAT results enclosed. Because the
management of the site actually affects the
PLAT rating, all practices identified on the
PLAT analysis (including any required to
achieve the specified erosion rate) must be
either already installed or included in a
Conservation Plan for the Nutrient
Management Plan.to be approved.
Nutrient Application Rates
Recommended nutrient application rates are
based on North Carolina State University or
NCDA&CS recommendations that consider
current soil test results, RYEs, and
management.
Liming material shall be applied as needed to
adjust soil pH to the specific range required by
the crop or crops in the rotation for optimum
availability and utilization of nutrients.
The application amount and rate (inlhr) for
liquid wastes (e.g. applied through irrigation)
shall not result in runoff from the site. The
application shall not exceed the field capacity
of the soil.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633 (August 2003) page 4

The planned rates of nutrient application are
shown on the attached sheets. These rates
have been computed as follows:
Nitrogen Application - When the plan is
nitrogen -based (a PLAT rating of Low or
Medium), the application rate of manure or
organic by-products shall be based on the
recommended nitrogen rate using the RYE
for the site (or a rate recommended by
NCSU or NCDA in the case of crops
without established RYEs). This may
result in an application rate for other
nutrients that exceeds the soil test
recommendation.
When the plan is being implemented on a
phosphorus standard (a PLAT rating of
High or Very High), manure or other
organic by-products shall be applied at
rates consistent with the phosphorus
application guidance below. In such
situations, an additional nitrogen
application from non -organic sources may
be required to supply nitrogen at the rate
recommended by the RYE.
• Within the limits allowed by PLAT, manure
or other organic by-products may be
applied on soybeans at rates equal to the
estimated removal of nitrogen in harvested
plant biomass.
All nitrogen rates for hay production are for
pure grass stands. Due to the nutrient
recycling by grazing animals, the planned
nitrogen rate per unit yield for hay crops
shall be reduced by 25% for the portion of
the expected yield that is removed through
grazing.
• Phosphorus Application —When manure
or other organic by-products are used, the
planned rates of phosphorus application
shall be based on the PLAT rating for the
site, as follows:
limited to the phosphorus removal rate
of the harvested plant biomass.
Very High Rating — No additional
manure or organic by-product
application is specified in the plan.
On all sites, regardless of the PLAT rating,
starter fertilizers containing nitrogen,
phosphorus, and potassium may be
recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or
recommendations. .
A single application of phosphorus applied
as manure or organic by-product may be
made at a rate equal to the recommended
phosphorus application or estimated
phosphorus removal in harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple
years in the crop sequence.
• When such single applications are
made, the rate shall:
♦ not exceed the recommended
nitrogen application rate during the
year of application, or
♦ not exceed the estimated nitrogen
removal in harvested plant bio-
mass during the year of application
when there is no recommended
nitrogen application, or
♦ not be made on sites with a Very
High PLAT risk rating.
Potassium Application — Planned
potassium application rates should
match the soil test recommended rates
as closely as possible. (This is
particularly critical in situations where a
potentially harmful nutrient imbalance
in crops or forages may occur, such as
grass tetany). When using manure or
other organic sources, the addition of
potassium from non -organic sources
may be required.
Low or Medium Rating — The planned Other Plant Nutrients - The planned
manure or organic by-product application
rate is based on the nitrogen needs of the rates of application of other nutrients if
crop,applicable are consistent with North
Carolina State University or the
High Rating — The planned manure or NCDA&CS guidelines or
organic by-product application rate is recommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633 (August 2003) page 5

J COPPER
Nutrient Application Timing I Mehlich-3 Index Action
Timing of nutrient application shall
correspond as closely as possible with
plant nutrient uptake characteristics, while
considering cropping system limitations,
weather and climatic conditions, and field
accessibility. Nutrients shall not be applied to
frozen, snow-covered, or saturated soil.
Manure or organic by-products shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of
the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
For nutrients applied through irrigation
systems, application equipment should be
properly calibrated to ensure uniform
distribution of material at planned rates.
Plan Review and Revision Period
A thorough review and revision (if needed) of
the nutrient management plan shall be
conducted on a regular cycle, not to exceed
five years.
Heavy Metals Monitoring
For animal waste, including sludge, zinc and
copper concentrations shall be monitored and
alternative crop sites for application shall be
sought when these metals approach
excessive concentrations. The following
criteria and actions are provided:
Mehlich-3 Index
Action
300 (21 Ibs/ac)
Peanuts are very
sensitive to zinc, and
application on peanuts
should be limited. Seek
alternative sites when
possible. The risk of zinc
toxicity is greater with low
soil pH and has been
seen at Zn-I as low as
300,
500 (35 Ibs/ac)
Critical toxic level for
peanuts. Cease
application on peanuts. "
2,000 (142 Ibs/ac)
Caution: Seek alternative
sites when possible for
all crops. .
3,000 (213 Ibs/ac)
Critical toxic level for all
crops. Cease application
L _ _11 ____ .
2,000 (72 Ibs/ac)
3,000 (108 lbstac)
Caution: Seek alternative
sites when possible for
all crops. "
Critical toxic level for all
crops. Cease application
on all crops. "
• Maintain pH at 6.0 on
When sewage sludge is applied, the
accumulation of potential pollutants (including
arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, selenium,
and zinc) in the soil shall be monitored in
accordance with the US Code, Reference 40
CFR, Parts 403 and 503, and applicable state
and local laws or regulations. Additional
information on heavy metal criteria for sewage
sludge may be found in Land Application of
Sewage Sludge, EPA/831-6-93-002b .
publication number at:
http.lAvww.gpa.govinpdeg/pubstsiudge.pdf
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
MINIMIZING DELIVERY OF NUTRIENTS TO
SURFACE AND GROUND WATER
In areas that have been identified as impaired
with agricultural nutrients being a likely
source, an assessment shall be completed of
the potential for nitrogen or phosphorus
transport from the site. (The streamstwater
bodies in this category are listed in the USDA-
NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section
I.)
❑ NO
This nutrient management plan IS NOT in
an area where surface waters are
impaired, with agricultural nutrients
identified as a likely source. The Leaching
Index (LI) is not required.
❑ YES
This nutrient management plan IS in an
area where surface waters are impaired,
with agricultural nutrients identified as a
likely source. The Leaching Index (LI) is
included in this plan.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633 (August 2003)
page 6

While the results of the LI does not affect your
planned nutrient application rates, some
additional conservation practices may be
specified in the plan to reduce the risk of
nutrient movement from the field, if applicable.
IMPORTANCE OF MANAGING NUTRIENTS
Nitrogen and phosphorus are water soluble
elements and either or both may be
components of organic and inorganic
fertilizers. In soluble forms, both can move
with water as leachate down through the soil,
or over the soil surface as runoff after rainfall.
While nitrogen and phosphorus exist in
different forms and may move through
different transport processes on the same site,
they both can have detrimental effects on both
surface and shallow ground water quality. As
an example, excess nutrients can result in
accelerated eutrophication with severe algal
blooms and fish kills.
Because of the topography, hydrology, and
other factors in the state, the environmental
problems from excess nutrients reaching
surface water may not be exhibited near the
contributing source, but rather create water
quality problems far downstream.
Consequently, the Neuse River Basin, Tar -
Pamlico Basin, the Chowan River, the
watershed of the B. Everett Jordan Reservoir,
and the watershed of the New River in Onslow
County are listed as Nutrient Sensitive waters
in North Carolina.
Nitrogen: Nitrogen applied as fertilizer or
organic material is transformed into nitrate
and can move with the water moving
downward into the shallow ground water and
eventually to surface waters. (Relatively small
amounts of nitrogen reach our surface waters
through rainfall runoff. ) The Leaching Index
(LI) is a required part of the nutrient
management plan in some areas of the state
with surface water impairments. The LI uses
soils information and local climate data to
assess the potential hazard from leaching of
nutrients. The results of the Ll analysis and
recommended actions are included in your
nutrient management plan, if applicable.
Phosphorus: Research in recent decades
indicates that, with high soil phosphorus
levels, phosphorus has more potential to be
transported off -site than recognized in the
past. Phosphorus can be transported in
several ways(1) attached to soil particles
leaving the field through erosion, (2) in soluble
form leaving the field in surface runoff, and (3)
in soluble form leaching downward through
the soil profile, and eventually into surface
water. Unlike nitrogen, the most likely
transport pathway for phosphorus varies by
site, and depends upon such factors as soil
erosion rate, soil phosphorus levels, texture of
soils, existence of buffers, and other factors.
In N.C., PLAT is the tool used to assess
potential excessive phosphorus losses. The
results of the PLAT analysis and
recommended actions are included in your
nutrient management plan, if applicable.
If a site receives a PLAT rating of Low or
Medium, then applying manure at rates based
on the nitrogen needs of the crop is allowed.
It is important to realize that this may result in
phosphorus being applied at rates that
significantly exceed the crop's phosphorus
removal rate. In these cases, the planned
nutrient application rate is not sustainable,
and eventually a PLAT rating of High may be
reached.
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
You are responsible for safe operation and
maintenance of this practice, including all
equipment. The following Operation &
Maintenance should be conducted:
Review the plan annually to determine if
adjustments or modifications to the plan
are needed. (The S.B. 1217 interagency
group guidelines accepted by the N.C.
Division of Water Quality for .0200
operations specify a plan revision when
there are changes in crops or cropping
patterns that utilize more than 25 percent
of the nitrogen generated by the
operation.) As a minimum, nutrient
management plans shall be thoroughly
reviewed every five years and revised if
necessary. The next review will be
performed in
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633 (August 2003) page 7

2. Protect fertilizer and organic by-product
storage facilities from weather and
accidental leakage or spillage.
3. Ensure proper calibration of application
equipment to ensure uniform distribution of
material at planned rates.
4. Inspect and maintain the equipment and
facilities used to implement the Nutrient
ManagementANaste Utilization Plan
regularly. Any needed repairs should be
made in a timely manner.
5. Review the Emergency Action Plan, if
applicable, annually.
6. Records should be maintained for five
years, or for a period as required by other
Federal, state, or local ordinances, or
program or contract requirements. To
ensure adequate information exists to
support sound nutrient management,
NRCS recommends the following records
be included:
• Soil test results and recommendations
for nutrient application,
• Quantities, analyses and sources of
nutrients applied (When the actual
rates used exceed the recommended
and planned rates on inorganic
fertilizer plans, records should indicate
the reasons for the differences, e.g.
inability to acquire custom blended
fertilizer.)
• Dates and method of nutrient
applications,
• Crops planted, planting and harvest
dates, yields, and crop residues
removed,
• Results of water, plant, and organic by-
product analyses, and
• Dates of review and person performing
the review, and recommendations that
resulted from the review.
NOTE: State laws or regulations may
define record -keeping requirements for
some operations.
7. Ensure that workers are protected from
and avoid unnecessary contact with
inorganic fertilizers and organic by-
products. Protection should include the
use of protective clothing when working
with plant nutrients. Extra caution must be
taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic
wastes stored in poorly ventilated
enclosures.
8. Properly dispose of material generated by
the cleaning of nutrient application
equipment. Excess material should be
collected and stored or field applied in an
appropriate manner. Excess material
should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
9. Properly dispose of or recycle nutrient
containers according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633 (August 2003) page 8

PLAT Results For: Scotland
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:,
Soil Series:
Crop:
BMPs•
Fertilizers:
Soil Loss:
Receiving.Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV Fc r (USER)
Artificial Drainage System:
Hydrologic Condition:
?ARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 5
LEACHATE P - 0
SOURCE P = 3
TOTAL P RATING = 8 (LOW)
4/14/2004 5:08:56 PM
INPUTS
2004
Scotland
T.G. Gibson {
28
1
GdB: GILEAD LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES
Hybrid Bermudagrass (Hay) :
Vegetative Buffer Width 25-ft.
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1:5 ac in
Lb P205: 56.7 lb
Application Method: All other surface applications
.125 t/ac/yr
200-299 ft
109
1.38
NO
GOOD
OUTPUTS

•, •.•r»•. .. .c aivu. i.vv
PLAT Results For: Scotland 4/14/2004 5:03:34 PM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series.:
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (USER)
Artificial Drainage System:
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 9
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 3
TOTAL P RATING = 12 (LOW)
INPUTS
2004
Scotland
T.G. Gibson
28
2
GdB: GILEAD LOAMY SAND, 2 TO,6 PERCENT SLOPES
Hybrid Bermudagrass (Hay) j;:,
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1.5 ac in
Lb P205: 56.7 lb
Application Method: .All other surface applications
.1925 t/ac/yr
300+ ft
184
1.31
NO
GOOD
OUTPUTS

PLAT Results For: Scotland 4/15/2004 8:09:33 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop:
BMps:
Fertilizers:
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test On - 4"
WV Factor (USER)
Artificial Drainage System:
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 7
LEACHATE P - 0
SOURCE P = 3
TOTAL P RATING = 10 (LOW)
2004
Scotland
T. G. Gibson III r ''
28
3
GdB. GILEAD LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES
Hybrid Bermudagrass (Hay) -
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Swine -Lagoon liquid.
Yearly Applied Amount:. :1:5 ac in
Lb P205: 56.7 lb
Application Method: All other surface applications
.267 t/ac/yr
300+ ft
174
1.45
NO
GOOD
OUTPUTS

PLAT Results For: Scotland
4/15/2004 8:18:49 AM'
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
2004
County:
Scotland
Producer Identifier:
T. G. Gibson III '
Tract Number:
28
Field Number:
4
Soil Series_:
KnA: KENANSVILLE LOAMY SAND,
0 T0=2•'PERCENT SLOPES
Crop:
Hybrid Bermudagrass (Hay) -:
BMPs:
Vegetative.Buffer Width a
25 ft.
Fertilizers:
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount:
2 ac in
Lb P205:
56.7 lb
Application Method:
All other surface applications
Soil LOSS:
.08 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance
200-299 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4"
96
WV Factor (USER)
1.38
Hydrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P =
0
SOLUBLE P -
0
L£ACHATE P
0
SOURCE P =
0
TOTAL P RATING =
0 (LOW)

PLAT Results For: Scotland 4/15/2004 8:25:36 AM
Calendar Year:
County: .
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (USER)
Artificial Drainage System:
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 7
LEACHATE P - 0
SOURCE P = 4
TOTAL P RATING = 11 (LOW)
INPUTS
2004
Scotland
T. G. Gibson III
i
28
5
GdB: GILEAD LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES
Hybrid Bermudagrass (Hay) :
Vegetative Buffer Width - 25 ft.
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 2 ac in
Lb P205: 56.7 lb
Application Method: All other surface applications
.125 t/ac/yr
200-299 ft
163
1.41
NO
GOOD
OUTPUTS

NCANAT Version: 1.00
PLAT Results For: Scotland 4/15/2004 8:51:54 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (USER)
Artificial Drainage System:
Hydrologic.. Condition:
PARTICULATE P - 0
SOLUBLE P 4
LEACHAT£ P - 0
SOURCE P - 3
TOTAL P RATING = 7 (LOW)
INPUTS
2004
Scotland
T. G. Gibson III '
28
6
GdB: GILEAD LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES
Hybrid Bermudagrass (Hay)
Vegetative Buffer 'Width 25 ft.
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1.5 ac in
Lb P2O5: 53.7 lb
Application Method: All other surface applications
.125 t/ac/yr
150-199 ft
74
1.28
NO
GOOD
OUTPUTS

ivl r;ive.t version: 1 . UU
PLAT Results For: Scotland 4/15/2004 8:49:29 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test O" - 4"
WV Factor (USER)
Artificial Drainage System:
Hydrologic'_.Cbndition :
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P - 2
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 3
TOTAL P RATING = 5 (LOW)
INPUTS
2004
Scotland
T. G. Gibson III
28
7
GdB: GILEAD LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES,
Hybrid Bermudagrass (Hay)- :
Vegetative Buffer Width - 25 ft.
Swine -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1.5 ac in
Lb P205: 53.7 lb
Application Method: All other surface.applications
.125 t/ac/yr
200-299 ft
47
1.36
NO
GOOD
OUTPUTS

North Carolina Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation Worksheet July, 2001
_ r !
Owner/Operator: ', , %.; n ,, Tract: Date: I'
County: R Factor: 216 Assisted By:
Field
Map Kf
Unit
K Slope
lAdjustedt_% L LS
C
Et JCoverCd-I
Table 10
Ridge Ht.
Table 11
Hydro.
Group
Table 12
Value
Row
Grade
R GlSlope %
Ratio
Contour
Terrace
Strips
Factor
P
Soil
Loss
Table 13
Table 14
Existing
G t J?
,
i i,'
t rrt
f
y I r f
Proposed
Field
Map Kf
Unit
K
Adjusted
Slope
C
El
Cover Cd.
Table 10
Ridge Ht.
Table 11
Hydro-
Group
Table 12
Value
Row
Grade
R GlSlope %
Ratio
C1.ontour
Terrace
Strips
Factor
P
Soil
Loss
-A
L
LS
Table 13
Table 14
Existing
I
Proposed
Field
+1
Map
Unit
Kf
K
IAdjusted
Slope
C
EI
Cover Cd.
Table 10
Ridge Hl.
Table 11
Hydra.
Group
Table 12
Value
Row
Grade
R GlSlope %
Ratio
Contour
Terrace
Strips
Factor
P
Soil
Loss
%
L
L3
Table 13
Table 14
✓1
!
r
i
r
Proposed
Field
Map Kf K
Unit Adjusted
Slope
C
El
Cover Cd.
Table 10
Ridge Ht.
Table l l
Hydra.
Group
Table 12
Value
Row
Grade
R GlSlope %
I Ratio
Contour
Terrace
Strips
Factor
P
Soil
Loss
%
L
LS
Table 13
Table 14
Existing
f >!
%
% }
r
t y
41)
Proposed
Fi
Map Kf K
Unit Adjusted
Slope
C
EI
Cover Cd.
Table 10
Ridge Ht.
Table l l
Hydro.
Group
Table 12
Value
Row
Grade
R GlSlope %
Ratio
Contour
Terrace
Strips
Factor
P
Soil
Loss
% L
L5
Table 13
Table 14
Existing
a r,
G
r T
+ i l
r', r i
Proposed
Field
'' •
Map Kf K
Unit Adjusted
Slope
C
I
El
Cover Cd.
Table 10
Ridge Ht.
Table 11
Hydro.
Group
Table 12
Value
Row
Grade
R GlSlope %
Ratio
Contour
Terrace
Strips
Factor
P
Soil
Loss
°k L
LS
Table 13
Table 14
Existing
S% '
r r
.
Proposed
field
Map Kf K
Unit Adjusted
Slope
C
EI
Cover Cd.
Table 10
Ridge H1.
Table 11
Hydro.
Group
Table 12
Value
Row
Grade
R GlSlope %
Ratio
Contour
Terrace
Strips
Factor
P
SO
Loss
°%
L LS
I Table 13
Table 14
Existing
Proposed

North Carolina Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation Worksheet
i
Owner/Operator:
County: R Factor: Assisted By:
Tract:
Date: L/ f 4}
July, 2001
P ielb .
Map
Unit
Kf
K Slope
Adjusted % L LS
C
El
Cover Cd.
Table 14
Ridge Ht.
Table 11
Hydra.
Group
Table 12
Value
Row
Grade
R G/Slope %
Ratio
Contour
Terrace
Strips
Factor
P
Soil
Loss
Table 13
Table 14
Existing
,' n -c
!j
a
Proposed
Feld
Map
Unit
Kf
K Slope
Adjusted % L LS
C
EI
Cover Cd.
Table 10
Ridge Ht.
Table 11
Hydro.
Group
Table 12
Value
Row
Grade
R GlSlope %
Ratio
Contour
Terrace
Strips
Factor
P
Soil
Loss
Table 13
Table 14
Existing
Proposed
Field
Map
Unit
Kf
K
Adjusted
Slope
C
El
Cover Cd.
Table 10
Ridge Ht.
Table 11
Hydro.
Group
Table 12
Value
Row
Grade
R GlSlope °�
Ratio
Contour
Terrace
Strips
Factor
P
Soil
Loss
% L
LS
Table 13
Table 14
Existing
Proposed
Field
Map Kf
Unit
K
Adjusted
Slope
C
El
Cover Cd.
Table 10
Ridge Ht,
Table 11
Hydro.
Group
Table 12
Value
Row
Grade
R GlSlope %
Ratio
Contour
Terrace
Strips
Factor
P
Soil
Loss
°k L
LS
Table 13
Table 14
Existing
Proposed
Field
Map Kf
Unit
K
Adjusted
Slope
C
El
Cover Cd.
Table 10
Ridge Ht.
Table 11
Hydro.
Group
Table 12
Value
Row
Grade
R G/Slope %
Ratio
Contour
Terrace
Strips
Factor
P
Soil
Loss
°%
L
LS
Table 13
Table 14
Existing
Proposed
Field
Map Kf K
Unit Adjusted
Slope
C
El
Cover Cd.
Table 10
Ridge Ht.
Table 11
Hydro.
Group
Table 12
Value
Row
Grade
R G/Slope %
L Ratio
Contour
Terrace
Strips
Factor
P
Soil
Loss
L
LS
I Table 13
Table 14
Existing
Proposed
Field
Map Kf K
Unit Adjusted
Slope
C
El
Cover Cd.
Table 10
Ridge Ht.
Table 11
Hydro.
Group
Table 12
Value
Row
Grade
R G/Slope %
Ratio
Contour
Terrace
Strips
Factor
P
Soil
Loss
°%
L
LS
Table 13
Table 14
Existing
Proposed

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone] Report No: W07729 W
Grower, Gibson, T. G. Copies To:
t_. c/oT. G. Gibson Farms
PO Box 165
# Gibson, NC 28343
Waste Anaiysis Ra ort Farm:
412104 Scotland County
Sample info.
Laboratory Results artsper million unless otherwise noted
Sample ID:
1
Waste Code_:
ALS
Description.
Swine Lan Li .
N
P K Ca Mg
S Fe
Mn Zn
Cu 8 MO
Cl C
Total 741
1N •N
-NH4
-NO3
OR-N
Urea
104 883 149 31.2 22.9 6.45 0.95 2.43 1.95 0.98
Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li Pfl SS C.N DM%
CCE% ALE K al
225 7.34
Recommen abons:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
Ibsf1OOO
gallons
Other Elements
N11000 gal ons
Application Method
Irrigation
N P205 K20
3.1 1.4 1.1
Ca Mg S Fe Mn
0.87 0.18 0.13 0.04 0.01
Zn Cu B
0.02 0.01 0.01
MD CI
Na Ni Cd Pb
1.9
Al Se Li

NCDA Agronomic Division
4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC
27607-6465
[phone]
Report No: 24485
Grower; Gibson, T. G.
Copies to: County Extension Director
c1oT. G. Gibson Farms
L
■
Sou
PO Box 165
Gibson, NC 28343
"
Test Report
r =
Farm:
3/27104
SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS
Scotland County
Agronomist Comments:
C -- 12, S
Field Information
Aaplied Lime
Recommendations
mp a Last
Crop
Mo Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime
N W5 W
Ug- Cu
n
e
See Note
is No Crop
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M
0
180.220 0 0
0 0
0
pH$
12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
WN CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Al (1) Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
NO-N NH-N Na
MIN 0.92
1.38
5.1 88.0
0.6 6.7 109 131
64.0 12.0
149 96 85
85
54
24
0.1
Field Information
lied Lime
Recommendations
amp a o. st
rop
Mo Yr
rop or ear
Lime
N W5 MO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
n
ee Note
2S No Crop
1 st Crop: Berm HaylPas,M
3T
180-220 0 0
$ '0
0
0
12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
WN CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI (1) MnA1(2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
NCO-N NHr-N Na
MIN 1.31
1.30
6.2 84.0
1.0 6.3 184 154
64.0 8.0
152 101 105
105
72
30
0.1
Field information
lied Lime
Recommendations
mp a No. Last
Crop
Mo Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime
N WS 100
g Cu
Zn
B
Mn
sm Note
3S ' No Crop
1st Crop: Berm HaylPas,M
0
180-220 0 60-80
$ 0
0
pH$
12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
WN CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn Al (1)Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Ncb-N NH-N Na
MIN 0.66
1.45
3.7 89.0
0.4 6.6 174 69
72.0 8.0
84 58 91
91
70
19
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
mp a o. Last
crop
o r A
rop or ear
rime
N WS W
Mg CU
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
4S No Crop
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M
.5T
180-220 0 0.20
0 0
0
0
12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
WN CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Al (1) Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
NCh-N NH-N Na
MIN 0.71
1.38
4.3 84.0
0.7 6.2 96 111
60.0 12.0
147 98 99
99
64
28
0,1

NCDA Agronomic Division
4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465
[phone] Grower: Gibson, T. G.
Re ort No: 24485
Pg 2
T'leld In ormatlon
Applied
Lime
Recommen ations
Sample Na. Last Crop
Mo
Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime
N W5
Mg Cu
Zn
B
- Mn
See Note
5S No Crap
1st Crop: Berm HaylPas,M
.5T -
180-220 0 0-20
0 0
-0
0"
12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC
.BS% _.,-Ac. -_.pH : RI K-1
Ca%:. Mg%..Mn-I Mn Al (1)Mn-Al (2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N04-N
Na
MIN 1.02 1.41
4.6
83.0 - `- -0.8 6.3 163 122
57.0
12.0
357 224 - 118
118
83
25
0.1
Field Information
lied Lime
Recommendations
Sa mp a No. ;. ast rop
Ma
r .:. - A
rop or ear
Lime -..
- s - -.
gCu
n
-
- n
See
Note
5D No Crop
1 st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas.M
AT
180-220 110.130 0
E E
- $
E
12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC
BSA
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
..Mn-I Mn Al (i)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
W-N N14-N
Na
I MIN 0.09 1.43
1.7
76.0
0.4 5.7 10 147
25.0
10.0
25 24 11
11
12
- 65 ..
-
0.1
Field Information
lied Lime
Recommendations
Sample o. Last rop
o
rTIA.
Crop or Year
Lime
N P105 W
Mg Cu
Zn
8
Mh
Nevate
46 No Crop
1st Crop: Berm HaylPas,M
I AT
180.220 140.160 40-60
3 E
E
$
12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC
BS% .
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI (I)Mn-Al (2) Zn-I
Zn AI
Cu-1
- S-1
SS-1
NO-N NH-N
Na
MIN 0.09 1.17
2.6
42.0 ,..
1.5 - 4.8 0 83
18.0
8.0
5 12 6
6
6
341
- -
- 0.1
Field Information
Applied
Lime
Recommendations
"
mp a Na. _ LastCrop
Mo
r - A_
. _rop.or ear .
Lime
_ _. a W
g Cu
rn
-- -- - Mn --- - -Note
6S No Crop
_
1st Crop: Berm HaylPas,M
0
180-220 0 0-20
0 0
0
-. -
- pH$-
12 -
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% , WN CEC
BS%- _
Ac _ pH - P-1 K-1
_ . Ca%
Mg%
._ Mn-l. Mn-Al (1)Mn A1(2) Zn-I
Zn Al
-Cu-l-..-
S-1
-SS-1
NCY-N NF6-N -
Na
MIN 1.25 1.28
7.0=
93,0-`z:; 0.5 - 6.6 74 , 113
71.0
14.0
126 83 85
85
49
.45
-0-2
Field Information
Applied
Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr TIA
rop gr_Year ,
Lime
- N 505
Mg Cu
. Zn --.- -B •
Mn
See Note
7S ' No Crap
1st Crop: Berm HaylPas,M
0
180-220 20-40 30-50
0 0
0
pHE
12
2nd Crop:
Test Results '
Soil Class HM% WN CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Al (1) Mn-AI (2) Zn-i
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S•1
SS-1
Nth-N N14-N
Na
MIN 0.51 1.36
6.9
100.0
0.0 TO 47 91
81.0
12.0
70 44 90
90
35
28
0.1

FibosOorus Loss Assessment Tool Completion
Name of Facility: T. Cr . &i BSo/J ? 1~ acility Number: $ 3- -
Ovmer(s) Name: 7• G- . G 1i3roIV Fhone No:
Mailing Address: go. r3o X 165, &-iasoiv, NC Z $ 3 W 3
Check the appropriate box below, amd sign at the bottom:
RNo fields received a high or very high rating.
❑ Yes, the fields listed below received a high or very high rating: .
Field Number Size Acres) . Rating (Hl h or Very High)
Please use as many additional attachment fbnus (FLAT-A-10-31-03) as needed for additional fields.
By completing the above section and any additional attachments and by signing this form, the facility
owner and Technical Specialist ack iow?edge all application fields were evaluated using the Phosphorus
Loss Assessment Tool. All necessary calculations were completed to conduct.the Assessment. A copy
will be kept on site with the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan. Any future modifications must be
approved by a technical specialist and, filed -wish the Soil and ;Water; Conservation District prior to
implementation. Waste plans with . fields having a high or very_ high rating will have to be modified to
address phospbonts loss by the next permit cycle beginning July, 2007.
Owner Name: T :5 ' &7-"
Olvner Signature: T Date: .S-I fQ
Technical Specialist Name: [w 1m 115lfF612
Technical Specialist Signature: Date_ D .S /-7-Z69y
Affiliation: ,b/ - /U GCS' , au -rrr dummy Phone No' 910 - 7_ 3 f33
Submit this form to:
Attu: Keith Urick
PLAT -I Z_I l -03
4

December 1, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
T G Gibson
T. G. Gibson
PO Box 165
Gibson, NC 28343
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring NPDES General Permit
Dear Permittee:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
RECEIVED
DEC 06=
DENR — FAWrWLLE REGoNk OFFICE
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation NPDES General Permits, which expire on
July 1, 2007. Due to changes in federal rules, facilities that do not discharge nor propose to discharge may choose whether or not to
retain coverage under an NPDES General Permit. Copies of the draft animal waste operation NPDES general permits and the State
Non -Discharge General Permits are available at hqR://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/oLps/afou/downloads.htm or by writing or calling:
NCDENR — DWQ Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
In order to assure your continued coverage under one of these two types of general permits, you must submit an application for permit
coverage to the Division. Enclosed you will find a `Request for Certificate of Coverage Facility Currently Covered by an Expiring
NPDES General Permit.' The application form must be completed and returned by January 2, 2007. Please note, you must include
two (2) colpies of your most recent Waste Utilization Plan with the application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the draft general permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel flee to contact the
Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at 919-733-3221.
Sincerely,
Ted L. Bush, Jr., Chief
Aquifer Protection Section
Enclosures
cc (w/o enclosures): Scotland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files - 830014
Premium Standard Farms Of North Carolina Inc
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.iiewatergualiiy.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunq/ABirmatve Action ETnployer— 50% Recyded110% Post Consumer Paper
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone:
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1:
Fax 2:
Customer Servicc:
1vo Carolina
t
(919) 715Z88
[phone]
(877)6233-6749

JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION
Facility Number V
Farm Name: `r. C.
On -Site Representative: z to
Inspector/Reviewer's Name-.1
Date of site visit:
Date of most recent WUP:
z
Revised April 20, 1999
FOR MAND ORY WA. DETERMINATION
Operation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part ll eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 9)
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on P1 P2 P3
Annual farm PAN deficit: d` (o pounds
J
Irrigation System(s) - circle #0ard-hose traveler, 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres,`is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART 11. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years -of irrigation- records.-
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations.(numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
bufferlsetback acreage;-or.25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes::
small,- irregularly shaped fields,- fields less than 5 acres -for travelers -.or lessthan
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

e4tf)"n
Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number X3 -
Part Ill, Field by Field Determination
of
75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD_
NUMBER'
TYPE OF
-IRRIGATION-
SYSTEM
OTAL
TOTAL _
ACRES
CAWMP
_
ACRES
FIELD
T % __
COMMENTS3
_
3
13.6
15;1
a
ee
L]

/ J • '
/ ICE
FIELD NUMBER'
- hvdrant- null- zone. or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers dependinn on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBER' - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres ;and having received less-3han 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous.two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records; cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields-must:be noted in -the comment sec lion and must be -accessible
by irrigation system.
Part IV, Pending WA Determinations
P1 Plan lacks following .information:
P2 Plan revision -may satisfy75% rule based.on.adequate overall PAN deficit land by
adjusting all field acreage to -below 75% userate-.. -
P3 Other (ie/in process of installing new irrigation system):

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
T. G. Gibson, III
T. G. Gibson
PO Box 165
Gibson NC 28343
Dear T. G. Gibson, III:
FF?WAIT 0
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999 RECEII enVED
-
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 83-14
Scotland County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to Iand receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRY], DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Scotland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

' - State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
T. G. Gibson,111
T_ G. Gibson
PO Box 165
Gibson NC 28343
Dear T. G. Gibson, III:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
August 27, 1999
Ij 1EMD
G r 3 1999
FAYETTEVi LLE
REG. OF iCE
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
T. G. Gibson
Facility Number 83-14
Scotland County
A letter dated January 15, 1999 was sent to advise you about concerns associated with Certified Animal
Waste Management Plans and the method by which the irrigated acres within the plans were calculated. Only
the acres that are wetted can be credited in the waste management plan as receiving waste application. Any
acreage within the plan that can not be reached by waste application equipment can not be used as part of your
plan.
An evaluation by Jeffery Brown on 5/20/99 was made to review the actual number of acres at your facility
that receive animal waste during land application. The evaluation of your facility has yielded one of the
following two results as indicated by the box marked with an "X".
Category 1:
❑ The evaluation of your facility could not be completed due to a lack of information. Please
contact your Technical Specialist to assist in providing Jeffery Brown the necessary
information to potentially exempt your facility from undergoing a complete wettable acre
determination. Please submit this information to Jeffery Brown, at 225 Green Street, Suite
714, Fayetteville, NC 28301, within in 90 days of the receipt of this letter. If you have any
questions please contact Jeffery Brown at [phone]. If within 90 days you are
unable to provide Jeffery Brown with the information you are automatically required
to complete a Wettable Acre Determination as described by Category 2 below, within
180 days of receipt of this letter.
1617 Mail Senzce Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycle&l0% post -consumer paper

Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Category 2:
Your facility has been identified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
as a facility that may have overestimated the number of acres actually receiving animal
waste. Therefore, some or all of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates
set in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated Technical Specialist to have him
or her conduct a Wettable Acre Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must
be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to conduct
Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialist with the N.C. Cooperative Extension
Service, the Soil and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and the Division of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System must be made and
the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be returned to DWO within the next
180 days. If the needed modifications are not made and if the form is not returned within the
required time, DWQ will be forced to take appropriate enforcement actions to bring this facility
into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty assessments, permit revocation,
and/or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of the attached Wettable
Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the address listed on the form. Please
note that both the owner and the Technical Specialist must sign the certification. A copy of all
the Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste Utilization Plan
must be kept at your facility. DWQ and the Division of Soil & Water Conservation Staff will
review all documentation during their annual visit of your facility. An additional copy must by
kept on file at the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office. Please note that if you install
or modify your irrigation system, a designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer
must also sign the Wettable Acre Determination Certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sonya Avant of our
Central Office staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Scotland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
T. G. Gibson, III
T. G. Gibson
PO Box 165
Gibson NC 28343
Dear T. G. Gibson, III:
EC "I `+sue
. une 26, 1998
jUt 2 3 1998
FA Ir t EVILLE
REG. OFF{GE
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NAniRAL RESOURCES
Subject: Reissuance of Certificate of Coverage
No.AWS830014
T. G. Gibson
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and
Application System
Scotland County
The Division of Water Quality modified the Swine Waste Operation General Permit originally issued to
this facility on June 9, 1997. In accordance with the issuance of the revised General Permit, we are
forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) to T. G. Gibson, III, authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste collection, treatment, ,storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but
not limited to, the management of animal waste from the T. G. Gibson, located in Scotland County, with
an animal capacity of no greater than 4320 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified in
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003, and shall hereby void
COC No AWS830014 dated June 9, 1997. The COC shall hereby incorporate by reference any specific
conditions of the previous COC issued to this facility. The purpose of this COC is to allow coverage
under the revised General Permit. Please review the revised General Permit (enclosed) and pay
particular attention to Condition II.10 regarding tree removal from lagoon embankments, Condition III.1
regarding inspection frequency of the waste treatment, storage and collection system and Condition H1.6
regarding notification requirements for system failures, spills and emergencies. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
P.D. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone], FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action,Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS830014
T. G. Gibson
Page 2
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted -to the-DWQ prior to a name change -or -change -in ownership. -
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Si rely,
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Scotland County Health Department
Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Scotland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File