830009_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

■ Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
830009 Facility Status: 'fie Permit: AM830009
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine County: Scotland Region:
Fayetteville
Data of visit
02/06/2017 Entry Time: 08:00 am Flit Time, 9:00 am Incident t:
Farm Name:
Dogwood Complex 1 Farm 74411 Owner Email:
Owner.
Murphy -Brown LLC Phone:
910-296-1800
Mailing Address:
PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address:
18169-A Arch McLean Rd Wagram NC 28396
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator. Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 34° 53' 42" Longitude:
79° 26 52"
From Wagram take US
401 to SR 1405, turn right and travel 1.0 mite and turn right onto SR 1411 and go 2.0 miles finisher is
on
right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: James Brian McGugan Operator Certification Number: 986752
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Cudd Phone
On -site representative Mike Cudd Phone
Primary Inspector, Robert Marble Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s)-
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS830009 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number. 830009
Inspection Date: 02/06/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
❑ Swine - Farrow to Wean
2,400
[] Swine - Feeder to Finish
10,330
Swine -Wean to Feeder
10,911
Total Design Capacity: 23.641
Total SSLW: 2,761,080
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Data Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
DEPOT (74414)
19.00
40.00
Lagoon
DEPOTI
19.00
Lagoon
DOGWOOD DEPOT
Lagoon
DOGWOOD FINISHER
Lagoon
DOGWOOD NURSERY
Lagoon
DOGWOOD SOW
Lagoon
FINISHER(74413)
19.00
51.00
Lagoon.
FINSIHERI
19,00
Lagoon
INTERNAL TRUCK WASH
Lagoon
NURSERY(74412)
20A0
57.00
Lagoon
NURSERY1
19.00
Lagoon
SOW (74411)
19.00
41.00
Lagoon
SOW1
19,00
Lagoon
TRUCKWASH(74415)
19.00
48.00
Lagoon
TRUCKWASH(INTERNAL)
19.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS830009 owner - Facility : Murphy -Brawn LLC Facility Number. 830009
Inspection Date: 02106/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
DischargM & Stream impacts
Yes No Na He
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
[]
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ 0
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ N
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
01111
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
N ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS830009 Owner- Facility ; Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 830009
Inspection Date: 02/06/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yea No Na -No
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to
2% slopes
Soil Type 2
Marlboro loamy sand, 0 to
2% slopes
Soil Type 3
Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2%
slopes
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑M ❑ ❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yaw No Na He
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ M ❑ ❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS830009 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brawn LLC Facility Number: 830009
Inspection Date: 02/06/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na He
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑0
❑
❑
25, Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
01313
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non-ompliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
E ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na He
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
El
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pend
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ E ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ N ❑ ❑
page: 5

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 830009 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS830009
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Scotland - Region:
Date of Visit: 03I1612015 Entry Time: 08:00 am Exit Time: 9:00 am Incident #
Farm Name: Dogwood Complex 1 Farm 74411 Owner Email:
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Phone:
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: 18169-A Arch McLean Rd Wagram NC 28396
Facili Status• Mu h -Brown LLC
❑ Denied Access
Fayetteville
910-296-1800
ty Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: rP y
Location of Faun: Latitude: 34' 53' 42" Longitude: 79° 25' 52"
From Wagram take US 401 to SR 1405, turn right and travel 1.0 mile and tum right onto SR 1411 and go 2.0 miles finisher is on
right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: .lames Brian McGugan Operator Certification Number: 986752
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Cudd Phone:
On -site representative Mike Cudd Phone:
Primary Inspector: Robert Marble Phone:
inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS830009 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 830009
Inspection Date: 03/16/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
❑ Swine - BoarlStud
330
❑ Swine - Farrow to Wean
2,400
Swine - Feeder to Finish
10,000
❑ Swine - Wean to Feeder
8,000
Total Design Capacity: 20,730
Total SSLW: 2.761,200
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
DEPOT (74414)
19.00
32,00
Lagoon ID:EPOT1
19.00
Lagoon
DOGWOOD DEPOT
Lagoon
DOGWOOD FINISHER
Lagoon
DOGWOOD NURSERY
Lagoon
DOGWOOD SOW
Lagoon
FINISHER(74413)
19.00
26.0
Lagoon
FINSIHERI
19.00
Lagoon
INTERNAL TRUCK WASH
Lagoon
NURSERY(74412)
20.40
29.00
Lagoon
NURSERYI
19.00
Lagoon
SOW (74411)
19.00
Lagoon
SOW1
19A0
Lagoon
TRUCKWASH(74415)
19.00
33.00
Lagoon
TRUCKWASH(INTERNAL)
19.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS830009 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LL.0 Facility Number: 830009
Inspection Date: 03/16/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
110
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
[] ■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3_ Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (l.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
■ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS830009 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 830009
Inspection Date: 03/16/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Goldsboro loamy sand, D to
2% slopes
SOIL Type 2
Marlboro loamy sand, Q to
2% slopes
Soil Type 3
Norfolk loamy sand,
U to 2%
slopes
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
1 S. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ E ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No o Na He
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ E ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS830009 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 830009
Inspection Date: 03/16/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
M ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number:
830009 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS830009
[] Denied Access
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Scotland Region:
Fayetteville
Date of Visit:
03/10/2015 Entry Time: 12:00 pm
Exit Time: 1:00 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Dogwood Complex / Farm 74411
Owner Email:
Owner:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Phone:
910-296-1800
!Mailing Address:
PO Box 487
Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address:
18169-A Arch McLean Rd
Wagram NC 28396
Facility Status:
Compliant Not Compliant
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 34' 53' 42" Longitude:
79° 25' 52"
From Wagram take US
401 to SR 1405, turn right and travel 1.0 mile
and turn right onto SR 1411 and go 2.0 miles finisher is
on
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: James Brian McGugan Operator Certification Number: 986752
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Cudd Phone:
On -site representative Mike Cudd Phone:
Primary Inspector: Robert Marble Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS830009 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 830009
Inspection Date: 03/10/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Swine
Design Capacity
Current promotions
El Swine - Boar/Stud
330
Swine - Farrow to Wean
2,400
Swine - Feeder to Finish
10,000
Swine - Wean to Feeder
8,000
Total Design Capacity: 20,730
Total SSLW: 2.761,200
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
DEPOT (74414)
19.00
Lagoon
DEPOTI
19.00
Lagoon
DOGWOOD DEPOT
Lagoon
DOGWOOD FINISHER
Lagoon
DOGWOOD NURSERY
Lagoon
DOGWOOD SOW
Lagoon
FINISHER(74413)
19.00
Lagoon
FINSIHERI
19.00
Lagoon
INTERNAL TRUCK WASH
Lagoon
NURSERY(74412)
20.40
Lagoon
NURSERYI
19.00
Lagoon
SOW (74411)
19.00
66.00
Lagoon
SOW1
19.00
Lagoon
TRUCKWASH(74415)
19.00
Lagoon
TRUCKWASH(INTERNAL)
19.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS830009 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 830009
Inspection Date: 03/10/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ 0
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
2" Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Xgj No Na Ne
4" Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7" Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below"
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS830009 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 830009
Inspection Date: 03/10/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to
2% slopes
Soil Type 2
Marlboro loamy sand, 0 to
2% slopes
Soil Type 3
Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2%
slopes
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
■ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
E ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yee No Na He
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS830009 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: B30009
Inspection Date: 03/10/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No No No
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
M ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
M ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No No. No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon ! Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
if Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ M ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
page: 5

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
830009 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS830009
❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine County:
Scotland Region:
Fayetteville
Date of Visit:
0312412014 Entry Time: 08:00 am Exit Time: 9-00 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Dogwood Complex 1 Farm 74411
Owner Email:
Owner:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Phone:
910-296-1800
Mailing Address:
PO Box 487
Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address:
18169-A Arch McLean Rd
Wagram NC 28396
Facility Status:
0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
34' 53' 42" Longitude:
79' 25' 52"
From Wagram take US
401 to SR 1405, turn right and travel 1.0 mile and turn right onto
SR 1411 and go 2.0 miles finisher is
on
right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge 8 Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, s Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Cudd Operator Certification Number: 25233
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(sj: Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Cudd Phone:
On -site representative Mike Cudd Phone
Primary Inspector: Robert Marble Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Lagoon levels:
74411 = 26'
74412 = 37"
74413 = 27"
74414D = 29"
74414T = 33"
Records reviewed 3111114.
Site visit 3/24/14.
page: 1

Permit: AWS830009 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 830009
Inspection Date: 03/24/14 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swim-- Boar/Stud
Swine - Farrow to Wean
Swine - Feeder to Finish
d
[] Swine - Wean to Feeder
I
I
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
DEPOT (74414)
19.00
Lagoon
DEPOTI
19.00
Lagoon
DOGWOOD DEPOT
Lagoon
DOGWOOD FINISHER
Lagoon
DOGWOOD NURSERY
Lagoon
DOGWOOD SOW
Lagoon
FINISHER(74413)
19.00
Lagoon
FINSIHERI
19.00
Lagoon
INTERNAL TRUCK WASH
Lagoon
NURSERY(74412)
20.40
Lagoon
NURSERYI
19.00
Lagoon
SOW (74411)
19.00
Lagoon
SOWi
19.00
Lagoon
TRUCKWASH(74415)
19.00
Lagoon
TRUCKWASH(INTERNAL)
19.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS830009 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 830009
Inspection Date: 03/24/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No No Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ M
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ m
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
E ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No No Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No No Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS830009
Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 830009
Inspection Date: 03/24/14
Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to
2% slopes
SPIT Type 2
Marlboro loamy sand, 0 to
2% slopes
Soil Type 3
Norfolk loamy sand,
0 to 2%
slopes
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ 0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ E ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS830009 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 830009
Inspection Date: 03/24/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
[]
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
M ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
M ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWD of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
e ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31, Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑0
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

0 Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number.
830009 Facility Status: Active
permit: AWS830009
❑ Denied Access
Iripsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine County:
Scotland Region:
Fayetteville
Date of Visit:
0212612013 Entry Time: 08:00 am Exit Time: 8:30 am Incident 0
Farm Name:
Dogwood Complex / Farm 74411
Owner Email:
Owner:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Phone:
910-296-1800
Mailing Address:
PO Box 487
Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address:
18169-A Arch McLean Rd
Wagram NC 28396
Facility Status:
Compliant El Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
34' 53' 42" Longitude:
79' 25' 52"
From Wagram take US
401 to SR 1405, turn right and travel 1.0 mile and turn right onto SR 1411 and go 2.0 miles finisher is on
right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Eric L Ferrell Operator Certification Number: 17634
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Cudd Phone :
On -site representative Mike Cudd Phone:
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Records reviewed 216113
Site visit 2126113
Robert Marble
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWS830009 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 830009
Inspection Date: 02/26/13 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Boar/Stud
330
Swine -Farrow to Wean
2,400
Swine - Feeder to Finish
10,000
Swine - Wean to Feeder
8,000
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
DEPOT (74414)
19.00
Lagoon
DEPOT1
19.00
Lagoon
DOGWOOD DEPOT
Lagoon
DOGWOOD FINISHER
Lagoon
DOGWOOD NURSERY
Lagoon
DOGWOOD SOW
Lagoon
FINISHER(74413)
19.00
Lagoon
FINSIHERI
19.00
Lagoon
INTERNAL TRUCK WASH
Lagoon
NURSERY(74412)
20.40
Lagoon
NURSERYI
19.00
Lagoon
SOW (74411)
19.00
Lagoon
SOW1
19.00
Lagoon
TRUCKWASH(74415)
19.00
Lagoon
TR UCKWASH (INTERNAL)
19.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS830009 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 830009
Inspection Date: 02/26/13 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ 0
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ S
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Stogie & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste A pp lication
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS830009 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:
830009
Inspection Date: 02/26/13 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste ARplication
Yes No No No
Crop Type 1
corn, Wheat, soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Goldsboro
Soil Type 2
Marlboro
Soil Type 3
Norfolk
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ 0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ❑
❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑N ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS830009 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:
830009
Inspection Date: 02/26/13 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
Cl
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
M ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
No
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
2T Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

--- � Division of Wa#er Quality
FaCiiity Number O F
of $aarency
Type of Visit 9 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
r
Date of Visit: 3 Arrival Time: �� Departure Time: � M
Farm Name: 1 T i 1 I D!J c�v o'fT Own
Owner Name: LtJt1 tie, Ph
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
County: S040 Region:
er Email:
one:
A ,� 1,
Facility Contact: ✓y , Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: H Integrator:
�h eW
.r V
Certified Operator: i/►'` 7 Operator Certification Number: -� 7 q
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = 4 = « Longitude: 0 ° 01 = u
r
Current
Desig.p
"-GU
a�acn»Po' Mahon WetPoner
ty„ „P ultry Capacity Population
Cattle Capacih
❑ La er
❑Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Afto
❑Non -La er
iry Calf
Feeder to Finish
Q
❑Dai Heifer
'" ""
�'�,��
❑ D Cow
Farrow to Wean
El Non
Farrow to Feeder
❑to Finish
❑ La
ersFarrow
-Dairy
❑Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
Boars
3-30 El pullets
, ❑ Turkeys
I'oults
❑Beef Brood Co
§11
Ot�ff
❑ Other
IDTurke
ID Other
Number ofib 5 ures:EE
��_ -
Discharges & Stream facts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[PNA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
[11 NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3_ Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection Zt
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No ®NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure 6
Identifier: 0.0—
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ yes
NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [�pNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes Y, No ❑ NA ❑ NE
I I . Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13.
Soil type(s)
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
+{� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
[p No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Q5No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
EP No
❑ NA
❑ NE
r,F.*
Comments (refer to question #) Explain any YES..answers and/or any recommendations or any older comments.Y
s " a r c ��A� . � sew �4i
Use drawtngsiof facility to better explain sitnahons{usea¢datlonal pages,as,necessary).
Wr
• �tB� 1(�Vi ��I7�Ll
ewer/Inspector Name �Phone: /0
E
wer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

a
Facility Number: Date of Inspection 3)WU
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the approprrate box. I/
❑ W UP El Checklists El Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [P)No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
F No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
El Yes
No
El
El
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
CoNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
[0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
10 No
❑ NA
[INE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
ElYes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[PVo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
P
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: &•Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:�-[ll r{ P Region:
Farm Name: W4 l —1 �Aq'0CVl G!L"e Owner Email:
Owner Name: Ll C Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: t Title:
Onsite Representative: it
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Integrator: y
Certification Number: `%"5
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Currentlillill
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry .--C,apacity E ICWpacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Daig Calf
Feeder to Finish 10-#;;
Farrow to Wean y DO
Farrow to Feeder
-Design Current
D , P,oul `'" Ca aci P.o ,
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars O
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes 10 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [—]No
E ] Yes [:]No
101
NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes J� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Cy jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: & h} hi P- -1i �a� _r�j
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3 a A r)
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
[:]Yes 0 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes tn No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes EP No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes T No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [J)No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
T
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
®No
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check
❑ Yes
�7" [� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[�j No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I " Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
[� No
0 NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

Facility Number: -9 Date of inspection: `
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes TW No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [] No V3 NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? T
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Usemeetsdrawings of fao question # • Explain an YES answers and/or an additional recommendations or an other comments
Comments (refer t q )• p y y Y 7 1`.
cilityao better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).,.,.
Plf
.G V 1� 1`� 3114 1 Z -
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: 3 [ 1 4 ,-L
21412011

Type of visit: 0 Compliance inspection V operation Review V btructure Evaluation U Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: �County:�OrL&JP
Farm Name: r7y le Owner Email:
Owner Name: A u4,6447 - IUYVGjn 1 LLC Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Region: / "
Facility Contact: ! ' t I ILQ Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: k Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: 1 :1b3q
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
I
D gn Current Digu Current Design Lc. nrrent
Swine T Ca city Pop Wet Poultry 4 .apacity�i PoP Cattle ity Pop. Capac
Wean to Finish
La er
Dai Cow
Dai Calf
Dai Heifer
Cow
Wean to Feeder
OGD
Non -La er
ceder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Design ::Current
Dr. P�oul Ca aci _ _Po .
Layers
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
3 ?7
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
IFNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
[] Yes
[]No
NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
( NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
[] NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
[] Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: qq - Cy jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes [ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
R9 NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 'Nag r__T_1y
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): C
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes ® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
T
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes [P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8_ Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes No
y
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes [� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes No
[DNA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14_ Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[�?No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [!�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps [] Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [—]Yes []jNo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0 No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes F)S] No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: r?-Ci Date of Inspection: a - 4 —i 3
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes KA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? [] Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes [M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Eq No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes V] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
21412011

;1 wts W/ 7_ / _0afa
.�_ vision of Water Quality
iFaciMy=111i1W1WCTf3 �00 O Division of Soil and Water Gonsenation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit
compliance Inspection
0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation
O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
0outine Q complaint
O Follow up O Referral O Emergency
O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3 fZ s /D Arrival Time: 7: d d/rrr. Departure Time: %Vd County: 5Coiian.d
Farm Name: -74,V-11 Dwdood Cb&--Plex Owner Email:
Owner Name: M — E3towti L L C Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
M; K-1- C.148
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: EPt�-,
Back-up Operator:
Title: LH M rKa" ta� c4' Phone No:
Region: FAO
Integrator: Il4 — $Yy cWN
Operator Certification Number: �� 3
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = 6 =,, Longitude: = ° = I = u
Design Current Design Current Design
Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity
Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy Cow
_
Wean to Feeder 1 0000
_
Non -Layer
❑ Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish /OOD O
1110
❑ Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean 2
ly, Poultry
❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts ❑ Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Pullets
® Boars 330
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
❑ Turkeys
Other ❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other ❑ Other
Number of Structures., 1
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
❑ Yes
ffN.
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
El Yes
❑ No
,,,�
DNA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3 A
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ yes
❑ No
[?'NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ETNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
TINo
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

I
Facility Number: S,3 DO
Date of Inspection T2-5- !O
Waste Collection & Treatment �f
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes E�,� NNo [I NA El NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? El Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 f Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 741 / Saw 7S%'f/2N' 7 /_-3 7`�5��# 7$
4191��
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): -30 4i O .2 S
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental) threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes 2<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes LSNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) ,�
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ L�T
Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 01 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Sail
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window [:]Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) 60rAl irJ�rn - Sv y �,ek 13. SoiltyPe(s) 0,o /L1GY/ba;-� + t1c.- 01k
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
E! No
❑ NA
❑ NE
ffo
El NA
El NE
[" No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[3<
❑ NA
❑ NE
to
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #) Explain an YE5 answers and/or any recommendations or an other comments.`��
'lase drawings of facility to better erplahi1ituations. (use additional pages as-necessarj,)
Reviewer/inspector Name ��t`�kNV�,(`$ Phone: RiD �f33-33Do
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: $j —Qpg Date of Inspection -Z�-
Required Records & Documents //
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes SNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 3 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
E3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application [:]Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis [:]Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections E] Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
1,7 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
NNoo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
B o
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
N.
NN
❑ NA
El NE
26: Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
El Yes
,,f_
L<oo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
30<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
/
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
B o ❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
ETNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
BrNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
B No ❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104

p O'Division of Water Quality
Facility Number 133 O / 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit
Compliance Inspection
0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation
0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
toutine 0 Complaint
0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency
0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3 /o-Q9 Arrival Time: /•`3� ..� Departure Time: County: �(��/a Region:
Farm Name: bag waDd ro'O /11ee_ Owner Email:
Owner Name: A� h(4 A)WLJA/ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: _ PQ Ale-1 14 A&A�_Q f qrr 6-Ale- Title: �J'wl Ay, Phone No:
Onsite Representative: /�ow�J- r��11UegrN� integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = ' [�Ai Longitude: = o = 4 = fl
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity, 'Population Cattle Capacity Population -
❑ Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish IL20 D
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
ER Boars 3-3Q
Other
❑ Other
PLayer
Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharp_es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Daky Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stoekez
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes Ls1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
E NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
[] NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
[I NE
ElL�J Yes
�EJ
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

r
Facility Dumber: F3 --6 9
Date of Inspection /O - D
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ,❑ NA El NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? El Yes El No 2TA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Sow
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z 5 2 6 � 3� y $15 q
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) �,�
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ElL7 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental) threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E3 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 3 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10_ Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [3'9'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EFN-6' ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Totai Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) CO 1rn1 . W k ee, r _ so y benq nrS
13. Soil type(s) No Mav t bo"-p LJO-
1P
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[3 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
E N*o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
L�'_�(N
El NA
El NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
Lf7 /o N
❑ NA
El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
oo
[3 }Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
A.
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: 1/0, 113.3. 334 0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 3 40 - ZOO;?
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: —D9 Date of Inspection 119
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [3 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste 'Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I " Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
3 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
Et No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
21l-❑
NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
21q6­_❑
NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
Ea o
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑'To
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues �
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑'qo'- ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
Elite ❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
0-3tf ❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[-7q0 ❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑Nn7 ❑ NA
❑ NE
fLL�i. M1 R' i
Additional Co�nmentg andlar Drawings
F kFSE dD
ki
Page 3 of 3 12128104

OTNS eN4e--ed `1!-zUog
Type of Visit ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: -_ "�8 Arrival Time: Departure Time: I /.'4�A.7_ I County: S4VAAfd Region:
Farm Name: k;�)O!��U�nn C �/�tD `{ _ Owner Email:
Owner Name: 6[Mf�//l f'�lrWz_1n/ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: Facility Contact: Ald,% RUA4aCZy-ArP/!/ Title: /aYh>l AY. Phone No:
Onsite Representative: 4Alcly Z3q*49C2.rl,1G,— Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
A-%0
Location of Farm: Latitude: ❑ o = I = 1i Longitude: ❑ ° E=T ❑ «
Design
Current
Design Current : Design Current
Swine
Capacity
Population
Wet Poultry
„Capacih Population - C•attle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑ Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
F
QQ�
❑Non -La er
❑ DairyCalf
EE Feeder to Finish
Z OQ
Dr_v Poultry}°�
-, Dairy Heifer
❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder'
❑ Farrow to Finish
p
❑ La ers
❑Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
El Beef Stocker
El Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Gilts
Boars
-
❑ Turkeys
©them
_
1
,1 _
El Turkey Poults
kt::.........
❑ Other
❑O ther - �� Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
(9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
MNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system`? (If yes, notify DWQ}
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence ol'a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
7No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
12128104
Continued

3 -0S``o 0
Facility Number: 673- 0
Date of Inspection 72s c7
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes EgNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes E�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: SOI uvsc
-— �i't.l✓vs
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): � �C% zU/P 00� d7
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ic/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc_)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes V1 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement`? . ❑ Yes qNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �FNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ru-tNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [PrNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc_)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop' Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) (^0 Yht-4- sum Zee-Ar.S
N W
13. Soil type(s) /y0 19a r 0 o Vo , C 6jA , JAIo.
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[jjNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
1 S. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/4 any recommendations or any other comments =
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):. -
AL
�
n
Reviewer/Inspector Name t'� �C P•V��' -_ _ _ _
p.
Phone: /ID. ft33 330 0
Reviewer/inspector Signature:
Date: 3-2Sf 200 D
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number:73—Q Date of Inspection 3-ZS-D
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ( No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20_ Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
�RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
;N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
El Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
P�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
%
Additional Comments and/or�Drawings: -
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit @) Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ®Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility- Number
Date of Visit: D 3 Time.
_
>\at O eratinnal Beloyr Threshold
8 Permitted ®Certified 0 Conditionalli Certified ❑ Reogistered pate Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm ?dame: CCounty: s Co :U
Owner ?game: _ �.r��� Phone No:
Mailing Address: A. C . >_ S
Facility Contact: R t w Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:^ i i`P.rrr i I
Location of Farm:
Phone No -
Integrator: _ M y,C_ k
Operator Certification lumber: 6
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 9 K Longitude 0 �OK
Design Current
Swine Canarity Penulation
❑
Wean to Feeder
❑
Feeder to Finish
❑
Farrow to Wean
�
❑
Farrow- to Feeder
❑
Farrow to Finish
❑
Gilts
❑
Boats
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Ca acity Po elation Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver 1 10 Dairy
❑ Non -Laver I ILI Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area 113 5 rar Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps [] No Liquid Waste _Management System
Discharges S Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes ®No
Discharge ori`inated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Sprav Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b_ If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If ,yes.. notify DWQ) ❑ ye ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in eal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any past of the operation? ❑ yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection B: Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier_^�Dc.i- _ I ;.� S%:�� �fi
Freeboard (inches): I �i �� Z ��— �. ` 8 it
05IV3101 Continued

Facility Number: 3 — 1)9
Date of Inspectionf
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type r1e, 41, / C o ..11 e G . c / Ij h
❑ Yes [R No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? El Yes No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[INo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
ONo
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
[a No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
© No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
© No
Reauired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
51 No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any appticable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
[S No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard. problems, over application)
❑ Yes
No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
[Q No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Commeni�s {refer to;quespan #I) ExptaanyYESanswers;and/or`any recommendations or any othercomment
Use drawutgsof facility to better, explarn sttiafroti`s.(nse�addrtsonaljpages as necessary): [I Field Copy El Final Notes
- e
v Irk' '�'. . . .�_ Ir ' ` .. .. ..�'- a M1• ,-. ...
� I
J 6 M� tea! Q ,-'//,1 l l ffL',t_
Reviewer/Inspector Name K�� [l r•IV ~,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Armaf Date:
05103101 Continued

Facilitv \umber: 3 — 05 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
7. Are there anv dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation. asphalt.
roads, building structure. and/or public properr)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts. missing or
or broken fan blade(s). inoperable shutters. etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent+temporary cover?
❑ Yes `f J No
❑ Yes 13� No
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes [ RNo
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
05103101

Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: 6 ; p County: 5C0W2'&1a Region: FR�Q
Farm Name: Qool iJ o od 0 7 #41 Z , -74 q 1 1 , -7 +413 Owner Email:
Owner Name: i'�urp ky ���n1 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Kawl gum ocl'`sJEf� Title: Wln. V . Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o =, 1=1 " Longitude: = ° = I = N
Design Current
Design C►urrent
Design Current
Swine
Capacity Population
Wet Poultry •.YCapacity Population
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑ Dairy Cow
® Wean to Feeder 1
$000 1
aver I I
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
0 000 1
V,.,
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dryer Itry i "
El Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
ElFarrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
® Boars
330
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Co
— 1
❑ Turkeys
U#her
❑ Other
[ITurke Poults
❑ Other
Numberof!SIN
rres:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
$fl No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Qfl No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
( No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: gj —p q
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [$ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Sa to bepe f` k
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): _ Z T 2 Z f �} �jf _ 47 ^
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ic/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 1� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [29 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [] No [I NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s) NoA o k
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CA W MP?
❑ Yes
�a No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Vj No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating; waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer #o question #�: Explain any YES answers andlor any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
i
Reviewer/Inspector Name � � _ Phone: 910,Y53.333p
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z — 11— 200 7__
Page 2 of 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: S3 — Date of Inspection1z-'_9-,o74
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [2) No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
['/] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[p No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA Cl NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[P No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit 40 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit * Routine O Complaint Q Follow up Q Referral Q Emergency Q Other ❑Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Timersn : /S— Departure Time: i G County: Sco9'1'k-f e? Region: �iz0
Farm Name: _�wao [�&A—pj G- Owner Email:
Owner Name: ,w. Lt yA L4 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ��`- u'V"C� Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone No:
Integrator: Aun4
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = Q = ` = g, Longitude: = o = d = «
DesigiiY Current
Design Current
Design Current
Population
Cattle Capacity Population
r�7"Capacity
Finish
❑ La er
❑Dai Cow
Feeder
on -Layer
airy Calf
DairyHeifer
Feeder to Finish
"' -}:
Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry"
�i
❑ D Cow
❑ Non-Dai
❑ La ers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑Beef Brood Cold I
09
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
Other
❑
: f
❑ Turkey1'oults
❑ Other
Humber of Structures:
Other
Z
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Gilts
PBoars 3 a
Dischar es &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any pan of the operation?
❑Yes
R§No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
El Yes
51 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
El Yes
[,VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
El Yes
MpNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
El Yes
(PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑Yes
V9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of
I2/18/04
Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: 7rur-K
Spillway?: (Xnrk,..ua1
Designed Freeboard (in): ! 4 _��r 11911,
Observed Freeboard (in): �3 � �r 4D �p O
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [A No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes P No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [;4No
❑ NA ❑ NE
S. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [X No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes R No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement? T
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu., Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) C"'J , W4 G--L 5o 4 ke-a/V S
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
[[ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
{$ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
1$_ Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�d No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any- YES. answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments
Use, drawings of facility to better explain situations: (use additional pages as•necessa y)
Reviewer/Inspector Name ; _ ` VG,��S1 Phone: gfi7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
rage.1 of S 12128104 Conftnuea

'la-0S--O4�
Facility Number: S3 — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19_ Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes lC4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWIVIP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists El Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
;�jNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the -facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
[X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
;NNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
90 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
injNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
�VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or -Drawings:.
Page 3 of 3 12128104

0 Division of Water Q.uallty ,
Facility Number �3 J� Q 9 0 Division of•Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: p ,-3 D!a Owner Email:
Owner Name: M!oLk P 4y gV'r. �,.!Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: ?_,0.r.4J
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
F_
1 _ Swine
Title:
Phone No:
Region: G"
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: [= o = =" Longitude: = ° = 0
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
a er ❑ L
00❑ Non -La et
❑ Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
Z4DO
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
El Gilts
Boars
3
Other
❑ Other f
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
ElNon-Layers
❑ Puilets
ElTurkeys
r[Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
Design Current `
Cattle Capacity Population
El Dairy Cow
El Dairy Calf
El Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
Number of Structures:' =U
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes [MNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
t� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[3No
❑ Yes
U No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Qi No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
-D
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier. �t'rn►� � c,✓ _ sow - &00* i ru �liJaS�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):Z0"/
Observed Freeboard (in): YZ , 5 3 (Q �� 30..5� Sr7
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [)tNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes UK No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifi ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) L' o lr- nj LS G
P.�
,� i � GCS S
iV.
13. Soil type(s) Y1Aa�/` I D D p . ! 01rcn,y�_!` G oI d S
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination: ❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
(9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name Fw' - e L 5 �.
Phone:
t _ szi 10 goo - / S�
c
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: !I- 7- S'
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: S3 - 9 Date of Inspection ! — 2 S`-4
Required_ Records & Documents
l9. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Desig
n ❑ Maps
p ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
El Yes
❑No
El NA
El NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[I Yes ❑No El NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes ❑No El NA El NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additions! Conime& "'-and(oe Drawings:
12128104
_A

Inforingtion contained in this database is from non agency sources and is considered unconfirmed.
Ii'
Animal Operation Telephone Log
DWQ Facility Number 83 _ F]
Farm Name IDogwood Complex
Caller's Name Jerry Trier
p Reporting O Complaint
Caller's Phone # [phone]
Access to Farm
Farm Accessible
from main road 10 Yes O No
Animal Population
Confined O Yes 0 No
DePoP 10 Yes O No
Feed Available O Yes O Na
Mortality 10 Yes O No
Spra►' Availability
Pumping
Equipment
O Yes 0 No
Available
O Yes O No
Fields
Date W8/2004
Time 5:20
Control Number 16
Region JFRO
t..auoon Ouestions
Breached
10 Yes O No
Inundated
10 Yes O No
Overtopped
O Yes O No
Water on
0 Yes O No
Outside Wall
Dike Conditions
10 Yes O No
Freeboard Level
Freeboard
Plan Due Date Date Plan Date Freeboard
Inches
(? equals blank) Received Level OK
Lagoons 14"
9/10/2004 9/10/2004
Lagoon2
I�
Lagoon3
u
Lagoon4
Lagoon5
!�
Lagoon6
Advised Mr. Trier to send POA.
` ...... .-.---- ......................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................... ..............................
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................
- ..........................................................................
.............. I .........................................
--l'...., ............................................
person taking 0311'
Larry Baalev
V
Comments2

Inferination contained in this database is from non agency sources and is considered unconfirmed.
Animal Operation Telephone Log
DWQ Facility Number 83 —®
Farm Name' jDogwood Complex
Caller's Name Perry Trier
10 Reporting O Complaint
Caller's Phone # [phone]
Access to Farm
Farm Accessible
From main road 10 Yes O R071
Animal Population
Confined O Yes O No
Depop 10 Yes O No
Feed Available 10 Yes O No
Mortality O Yes O No
Syrav Availability
Pumping
Equipment
10 Yes O No
Available
O Yes O No
Fields
Date 9/8/2004
Time 5:20
Control Number P616
Region JFRO
La oon uestions
Breached
10 Yes O No
Inundated
O Yes O No
Overtopped
10 Yes O No
Water on
O Yes O No
Outside Wall
Dike Conditions
JOYes ONO]
Freeboard Level
Freeboard
Plan Due Date Date Plan Date Freeboard
Inches
(? equals blank) Received Level OK
Lagoonl 14"
9/10/2004 9/10/2004
1
Lagoon2
Lagoon3
Lagoon4
Lagoons
Lagoon6
Advised Mr. Trier to send POA.
......................................................................................................................................-..--------.----..._................................................_..--.----...........---.--..---..._.............----.----.---......
._.__..._. �. iC1.4#..... ............. "! a.................................................................................................................................................................................I................
..................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................. I.... -..........................................
..................................................... I ........................ .....................................................................................................................................................................................................
.
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
........................ I............................. I .................................. I......I. _ _._.................................................................................... _....... _. _..................__.....................................I.....................
person taking calf Larry Baxley
k W .5ti �}s^ .1 '-:� >, v - r - s ',y', < s ♦ tits Z .F ;
Comments2

14
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 83-20 County: Scotland
Facility Name: Dogwood Finisher
Certified Operator Name: Eric Ferrell Operator Number: 17634
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon Name1ID: DogFin
Spillway(Y or N): N
Level(inches): 14
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 09110/2004
hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Murphy Farms, LLC Phone: [phone]
Facility Owner/Manager (print) �.
Date: 09/10/2004
a ager (sig ature)

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: Dogwood Sow
line m =
lb PAN
2.
Structure ID: Do Fin
line m =
4106.3 lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 4106.3lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD_ DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s_ remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(Iblacre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (Ibs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
Dogwood
5
Wheat
2.30
96.00
220.8
Sept -April
Doawood
6
Wheat
49.80
120.00
5976.0
Sept -April
`State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 6196.8 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section Il) = 4106.3 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (fine v from section III) = 6196.8 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -2090 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump 8 haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
facil
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

I
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/identifier (ID): Do g Fin
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 19.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 26.4 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 7.4 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 303974 ft2
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallonslft' 1402131 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 1 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design I 339568 ft3
h. current herd # 10300 certified herd #1 10300
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 08/02/2004
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
339568 ft'
0 ft3
182647 ft3
651028 gallons
2.00 Ibs11000 gal.
4106.3 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

aY +r ��� = �9�.",:;; f�a.yi��-F�,^"{-.�'.•�1, h,�k �3,,- k.',+iJ' f'? 'y,�-5. � S y;' •.,>{ v ;.,,s'.�� a. �G^�""'.,E,�, �'-. `'�`a"� ��"' �} ti .ti;•'• j s<s. •,.ice ! �,��y� r . �`._� � i_.-�.'�r._ ���•
`-a r � w�. � s', .r• � � .s•a .�,.- -a -., t .r a��'�.,,y 4 .�,-,f t a t
;fi','��2e��o ��� '.s. "#'y�"� `•rr¢ ]v '' " QyDIVIS10ArOf Soy! and WaterSC_anservattonr � � a 7�'.7.u` n ,�'Y`i� ,�' _+, a ^`u t �: 2�(��`` `�4 [��
'� ,�.,� r•ii � - r atv� ax'i� ':Fait p F - 4 4�.
;�{�j y. •r,� �,# A �-•+ C.az-�Z,�� �i°i��k54' T+.. � �d��; s r 4 "3 _- _ScM��a��c_ � { -rh f% wi' ,Y, :,r� � _ - �'_x� -,_ y w� �
,� ;� .� � � Other Agency ,� rat , .,�r :., � � �� t � t., ,<,� � � s � • •. ....,-.es��_,i :: ... :-v:- � Y.� .s• z <_�=�, � . L :?. ?i1 •. °r:. •_� .,... � _..._, . ?�. c�i-.�� A_��?. r .a�.'.�,<n- ._ _ f �. ... .:. a ,s.
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine Q Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number S3 9 Date of Visit: 11713Q120U3 Time: 10:00
O Not O erational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Do9rOsd CQMplgx............... County: Scotlatiotd--------------------------------- FRO __-------
Owner Name: --------- ------- --- - - Murphy_Far�ms -- - --- --- ----- Phone No: 9TQ274 R.Q29-------- - --- ----- ----- --
i4laiGng Address: �Q.Bo;X.7.5Q............................................................................................. RimMiU.N.0 .......................................................... 2844A ..............
Facility Contact: eriC.FarreR---------------------------------------- Title: O.IC-----............------....-----........ Phone No: ......................................
Onsite Representative: ---------------- -----------------------------____-- Integrator:
Certified Operator: Ex ic.L.................................... ftrun ............................................... Operator Certification Number: 1.763.4............................
Location of Farm:
From Wagram take US 401 to SR 1405, turn right and travel 1.0 mile and turn right onto SR 1411 and go 2.0 miles; finisher is
)n right.
®Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 34 • 53 ° 24 u Longitude 79 • 25 00
Design . Current
Swine ranacity-Pannlation
® Wean to Feeder
8000
® Feeder to Finish
10000
® Farrow to Wean
2400
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
330
Design ..Current Design' Current,'
Poultry Capacity LP.op ul - , Cattle Ca acit' Population'-,
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other I - - ,�' •
Total Design Capacity 20,730
'Total SSLW 2,761,200
Number of Lagoons 3 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ t-agoon Area ❑ spray Field Area
Holdti<g Ponds / Solid. Traps, ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System r -
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. Nvas the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notiA, DWQ)
c, If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gai/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (11-yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Cl Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4- Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier: ............. I ............. ............2............ ............3.................................................................. ...........................
Freeboard (inches) ...........Z-T'_.._.._.._... - 7.... .......... --------22..._.._..--------------- ------- ...........................
05/0.3/01 t . onliftned

Facility Dumber: 83-9 Date of Inspection 07/30/2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste AnOication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
13_ Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
t 7. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance: with any applicable setback criteria in edlect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
------------
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
`Comments (refer lai to gaestion,#) ,Expn any YES answers and/or any, recommendations nr any�other'comments
Me* of facility to better expLgin situations$(use additional pages as necessary)
kY ❑,Final Notes
., ;4 .,t t Y�-• T.!, - �.A ^F ..t �. -- Y vl :'3v"'.'.' J'x'!.^rt
_�1.x
Visited farm on 7/30/03 due to complaint about waste application at night. Observed irrigation in progress with no problems noted.
+
Spoke to OTC Eric Farell, he confirmed waste was being applied at night with close supervision.
Inspection conducted by Larry Baxley and Dean Morris.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Larry Baxley_
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Type of Visit 4& Compliance inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ® Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Vkit: aLaIL04Time:
I Facilit}lumber
10 Not O erational 0 Below- Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified Q Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: l� a��- t.n n �� County: - S� f4 C._
Owner -Name: _ L6,.flrA �� s� !- l - Phone No:
Mailing Address: 130)( g" &trr SA
1
Facility Contact: A6a }A e.j f4,, 6 e ck&r Title: Phone No:
On site Representative:[, WLtL,I e..�. r. t�crs' _ Integrator:
Certified Operator: Lri G 1-erMl Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude t�• 06 0` Longitude • 0' OK
Design Current
Swine Canacitr Ponulation
® Wean to Feeder
ao
® Feeder to Finish110'abo
IN Farrow to yean
[�
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow- to Finish
❑ Gilts
IN Boars
330
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca acitV Population
❑ Laver 10 Dairy
❑ Non -Laver ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
I Number of Lagoons I S I JLJ Subsurface Drains Present ALJ Lagoon Area 1U Spray Field Area i I
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Jm2acts
1. Is any discharge observed from anti• part of the operation?
❑ Yes No
Discharze ori<__*inated at: 0 Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If ciischame is observed, was the conveyance man-made? [3 Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Rater of the State? (If yes.. notifi' DWQ) El Yes El No
c. If discharge is observed_ what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes [ No
Waste ollection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes (� No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure ; Structure 6
Identifier: In e f - D& O'D 4- W
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 Z 31 ,Z 3 18- �4 _? Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection `
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, [1 Yes E;ko
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ®No
(lf any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
B. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes V] No
Waste Apolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes y
No
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes IM No
12. Crop type i, a k Cotes he C-C,_T �4_�JF C o e-
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes [21 No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[EkNo
Reouired
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23No
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
ElYes
allo
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
[SNo
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
[5No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
�&No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
cakNo
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
(0 No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes [%No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.

•Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? V
27. Are there anv dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there anv evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation. asphalt,
roads, building structure. and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s). inoperable shutters. etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Additional'Coinmcnts�and/or-,Drawings:,::
05103101
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 1] N0
❑ Yes El No
❑ Yes g No
❑ Yes [. No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No

Type of Visit %Compliance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit:
Permitted Cffe��rtified 0 Con�d+itionall}y Certified 0 Registered
Farm Name: k/ocWMJ tor)--D.IeV -.-
Owner Name:
P2 Time: 3{
rO Not Operational 12 Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County: scot C�nc#/ —
r 1
Phone No: I? tk,
Mailing Address: �� %�nk 25 ,,,,,,• `to e_ U / NG
Facility Contact: n �(^^4'L j Title: `+
Onsite Representative: __ F4'i f"Irre 1 in110i .-S1n .'V-l�t
Certified Operator: E C. l-rSre u
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator: t._r1J
F ----
Operator Certification Number: 176,3
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 0 ` D u Longitude 0' ' 0
Design Current Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation Poultry Capacity Ponulation Cattle
Wean to Feeder
jgV0
Feeder to Finish
0 "O
Farrow to Wean
qo0
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
IN Boars
Design Current,
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area ❑ S rnv Field Area
-.Hofdiutg'Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated now in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structurel3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: �0 v�: s _ F h" %A e &120
Freeboard (inches): 140 q
0510.3101
Cl Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
[X No
❑ Yes
W No
❑ Yes 0 No
Structure b
Continued

Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection L a- 69
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
1 I . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ FPxcessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type ( �_, • f fr o / Sow lblcn g / trj k etr'
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes [$No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
[B No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
Reguired
Raords & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
18,
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
O No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
24_
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
[ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this vislt.
conimit Ti
Indlon or ante
er
Use dravrtngs"RZeofcdity� Ezplatn eti se pages
better situ ns?e{ addional as neeessa9ry)�s
_ . __. _ runs El re Id Capyen❑ltFinal Nates
` J"{1"`� L_giCia..ip�'ief+i r t...: Win•, li1C. ACR �/i 'Yl1N� vC{/ kJd �0 bl� I.JS(WL
I.,
hh lJ A p f f` 1�
�Qp[1�- �� [��M� �f �'�i �C�a3 CC�.U'n� •�� C�R°�Zy 7"i•,n `� tlSt
`C r� sn'f- y le-_ ! [,,4- iC1 L o -1 Ak n o c t.5
eS Cor�U S� x,,4 4t., tome_ toXej cc_ os p P
L i n W kdZ S
ewer/Ins ector Name
ER,v
ewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

J
Facility Number: Date of Inspection a �-
Odor Issues
26. does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to bave appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [{!ZNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes EXNo
❑ Yes 9To
❑ Yes ❑ No
O5103101

r ■
r■�
r :■
r■i
10:55 AM
P. 01
Pd�Y1; Paul Ra-Xs
May 10. 2000
M.-U
RP��-IY
F AI L r F ANN i
6
NCDENR - Division of Water Qualify
225 Green Street Fayetteville, NC 28301
RE: Pipe Blockage at Dogwood Farm
Dear Mr. Rawls:
RECEIVE
u �y 1 0 2000
FAYE n-EVILLE
REG. OFFICE
Per your request during my phoniall to you yesterday, this note reiterates that
conversation. On Tuesday moming, May 91h, the manager of the Dogwood Finisher
discovered one of the discharge pipes from House 5 to the lagoon was plugged. He
immediately unplugged It by rodding It out with a small pipe. Flush water had backed up
in the building and a small amount of less than 200 gallons seeped out of the building
and onto the grounds around the and of the building. All was contained with no threat to
surface water and most was returned to the lagoon using a pail by hand. The remainder
has since soaked into the grassy area aroung the site.
If you have any questions or concerns please contact John Bizic or Kraig Westerbeek at
910-289-6439.
Sincerely,
hn Bizic
Land and Nutrient Manager
Cc: Garth Boyd
Mike Wyant
Jason Draughon
Post Office Box 769, Rose Hill, North Carolina 28458, [phone], FAX [phone]

- _ Divi§ion of Water Qu ty
-.
T Q Division of Soil and ,Water ConservaLon ,
Q Other Agency_ =y
[Type of Visit qj Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation I
for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number O Date of Visit: Time: 1 131, 0 Printed on: 10/26/2000
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
10 Permitted ® Certified• 13 Conditionally Certified Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: ........... ...... 6c................................................................. County: ....... 52p tAJ.............................. F,eU.......
Owner Name:.........M... ....>)..... !6.....4r ?.5... ( . �......° I .... .......................................
[� Phone No: �, 6— kowo
Facility- Contact: ...... 't. ......,.-.�Tiitle................................................. Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: .......... ?- ! ............. M................................. ... ................................... ...a s . ..
iJ
OnsiteRepresentative: >r!...............eme-�.-� Integrator: ....... ........................................................----.........................................................................
Certified Operator:, rL:iFu e'lOperator Certification Number: �y
...............................--..--.........--................................................... ..1. l ...............
Location of Farm:
[NSwine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �° ��� Longitude •
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder
000
Feeder to Finish
10,000
® Farrow to Wean
o?O
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
Boars
33c9
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I kl
Dairy
❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons $ ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Imuact5
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan-tnadc?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the es[imaled flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes [n No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes
�j No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
M No
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway �� ❑ Yes M No
Structure I Stl-uCture 2 sirticture i Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
�1 r
Identifier: .......... ..... ...............1.'...k:..............................{!.yn----..-................. J ....................-............-.--...-......-.................
Freeboard (inches): (0 D 5t2 3 l 6 0 (00
5100 Continued on back

)Futility umber: Z — —01_ Date of Inspection (p ( Printed on: 10/26/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes [Z No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [ No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [$j No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes allo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes M No
11. Is there evidence �o++f over application? ❑ Excessi//ve--P--onding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes M No
12. Croptype 4 �O/►� L,il1�Ga.`� . SO an
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes [j No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [V No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes M No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18_ Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WO, checkers, desifn, nWp's, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freebp4, waste analygts& soil sa a reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
. Rio vi........... erg.. were .... during ti�..v.. f You will . * ... R... thgr.
correspori ence: a'bouf this �isit� :: :
question #) Eiiplaii any YES answers an(litr any recomiu
ihty, to. better explain situations {rrse°addiiional pages as nei
records ) we'll M" "4':n-D
+"i u_)ke.)r AS a U,,J p 1cv-+- So y 64:2,q s -Po' co
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
�.' s-'J'
❑ Yes [11 No
❑ Yes QNo
❑ Yes Q�No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes IgNo
I&
>t
Date: %5 M 5100

Facility Number: g3 - Qg Date of Inspection (Q Ig O ( Printed on: 10/26/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below [MYes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes dNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 6fNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes M No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes t No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes tffNo
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? N Yes ❑ No
lAdditional'Comments!and/orDrawings:.
u
J
5100

n
AkniVI51o11 O�.�bll Snd Water_C:QnSCCVat10U -z -+ r c -.s
� �, _.. �. � � � � � 0 Other Agency � �, T� � �•
W
t
(Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: z?�i�� Time: ��r� Printed on: 10/26/2000
Q
Q Not O erational O Below Threshold
Permitted O Certified E3Conditionally Certified E3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold
1� D
Farm Name: .....{ .8. - : ... ?`` .� ............. County: SC'4..i..�Q C�...........................................
Owner Name:..1..l. ur.!.4�.j....-. ��r.!'''.................... Phone No:........{.. .................................
Facility Contact: .. rf .... ........... .. Title: ` /fiV.(.
...................... Phone No: ...............................
.......... ............ .......................-...........
G
Mailing Address: zLI. l& ` ...... .�/CG.� ` L.J.Q, '- r.�t?. �............. ..........................16..
......................... , .................. ............
Onsite Representative: .!�.�....�� r-� 1.[....................................................Integrator: ..................................................................
-...................
j
Certified Operator:. �-t"�_.0-41.....................:... !! �.-.(-� ............... Operator Certification Number:..........................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �� �' �i Longitude �� �& 44
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder JE1 Layer I ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish JE1 Non -Layer I JC1 Non-Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder 20 7 ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity I .2e
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons �❑ Subsurface Drains Present JI0 Lagoon Area 1❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps I f I JE] No Liquid Waste Management System
Discbarg�s & Stream lm acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes /CZ'No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes o
c. II'discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 1�No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes Ro
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes � o
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes O
StrnLturC I ��Sttructure 2 Structure i St�tJcturc 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 \
Identifier: ......... �44�.......... ..... 1..lJ. i.SC ............!.^.:5.'..........�.....Truc..............6As....I....................................
1
Freeboard (inches): 3�3 7'
5100 Continued on back

1
Wacility Number: S3 — b Date of Inspection U2-ALIM, Printed on: 10/26/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes N0
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes r0
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence/oaf over appl'c�l/ion? ❑ xcessive/Ponding ❑ P ❑ Hy raulic Overload
❑Yes ENO
12. Crop type (_ r vt/ R �Q L� e �_ Ct�
13. Do the receiving crops dfffer with those d ignated in the Certilie Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes IkRo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
El Yes o
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes o
tNo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes V-No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes %No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes )ONO
II'' `
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes XNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
❑ Yes gNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes 19No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes kfl�o
o Yi. ..iq . ..deficiencies vier. noted during�his:visit: Yoit will ie. . trio: ut tht r
. • Mire, Sptfideitce: about: this visit: :::.:..:::::::::::::::::::..::: .
[Comments (refer to question #): Exohgn any YES answers aud/or any recommtodations or -any other comments;
Us�e'dr_awings'of faciiity to better explain situations.T(use additional pages as necessary). --
Ca brzt4j'd?\- 00S dare a ye9�1- So1>',� � 1/r5i-f (Pali I S Cc4c,-lI/% Z Z.S- a �t� �to�
30')+. NO Overapjh,CA-b� c n Aca
/Ueecl � if-&1e �� P refs caS crt- -ror I y1
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: �Z"�$�Gt7_ 5100

Facr7itq Number: Date of Inspection Printed on: 10/26/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
o
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
�No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
�] No
omments an or _ rawings. _ _ _-771
taon - _ : _ -- -
J
5100

0 Dtvis7on of Sov and ;Water Conservation
Di,iW6 of- v Conservation -i
10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review &other
Facility Number Date of Inspection L
Time of Inspection [�� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
j] Permitted [3 Certified C[ Conditionally Certified jQ Registered ff-3 Not O erational Date LastOper ted:
County:-.......:S�r� .............................. Farm Name: Dl�-LO-0.0..d .......C�-.......................
OwnerName:...................+{r ..... �i. ...... r. S Phone No:.......................................................................................
........... iq
Facility Contact: .... Title: . Phone No:
Mailing Address: .............. t.-......I..............................
Onsite Representative: ,--- ---�1- .f---•e[rr°r,,,l -
Certified Operator:,,,,,,.
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
r...................................................................................—...._..............-...............---.--...................-...............................-...-..............-......-..-..........-.......-..._..................................�-J
Latitude �� �4 44 Longitude 0 4 it
Swine -
. Design . Current
Canacitw= Pnnulatiinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
'
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current rt :-Design:. '.;Cuwent,
Poultry Capacity -Population Cattle .'Ca achy` Po`ulation
❑ Layer ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I❑Non-Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number. of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps_ ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System r
Discharp_es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? []Yes ❑ No
Discharge oricinated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (It- yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c- If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ycs; notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Wes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure ��3`� Structure d Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier: Sty kuery`�; 5I.er
Freeboard (inches): ......... t f ........ ... ..-(..!......................................................................
5- Are there any im diat threats to th lute ity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
3/23/99 2- JF seepage, etc.)
Continued on back

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name O -... ... County: -........'...
..
Owner Name: .... ,Nt . - .. .. Phone No:. .......................... -----....----..-..............gyp %3., ............
Facility Contact: ....................... ................. 7 1,5-.......... Title:..........----.......---.
Flailing Address: ...........�.4.1..i2 q. F....�[..:.{f3rY1......
Onsite Representative: ...............4 $..
.. ........ ......................................................
Certified Operator: .C..t-C,'.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, r.
Location of Farm:
Phone No:....
.../VC .................... ....
4W3Y(
Integrator: ...... /14
Operator Certification Number:
..-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude ' ° •4 Longitude ' 0` �
- Design Current _ . Design Current
Swine Ca achy Population' .Poultry_ Capacity Population _Cattle
Do Wean to Feeder
S, 606)
Feeder to Finish
!D poO
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
Boars
E iio
Current -� -
Population
❑ Non Layer I Non -Dairy I<
❑ Other
Total Desi Ga acty . v 3p
P
Tata1.SSL W
- Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Meld Area .:
Holdtng'Ponds / Solid Traps E:=. ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 1KNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'! ❑ Yes No
h. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes JVNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? iylk-
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes KNo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes M No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Stn�tctu�c 5 Stru�ct/ur 6
Identifier: -%*V c-n w^)X
Freeboard (inches): ........... ................ .... ............ I-..... ....................----............................................ ' 3 33'r / i42
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ;2 ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) .
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
8. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenarce/improvement? ❑ es %No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? Xyes ❑ No
Waste Apelication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes KNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes 1KNo
12. Crop type (,v�
13. Do the receiving crops differ wit those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes XNo
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? IVA: —a, P es ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? 4. tl es ❑ No
a t
4
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? gyp,, � on 41"a ❑ Yes XNO
16_ Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? r p� Yes No
Required Records &Documents � ,- J ff
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? '�t7�L(C kt�J� lam' WYes ❑ No
l8. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ANo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes X
No
20, is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?� ❑ Yes No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ElYes YNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? / J
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) `77 ❑ Yes %No
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
::Rio yiolaiipris:oedg ie�encies v► re noted fi ring 4bis:visit: - Y:oir will-reeeiye do futth ...
correspondence abnutt this visit. . . . . . . . ......... . ....... _ . ...... _ . .
Coiiimeiits'{refer t
s y —14
kvtao, s , �_�
n
a
. - - 1st1 n1,�� CbC �,
p
-M : 1iP4i -b oh 1q%n t C �'S�6ev;;., dCSi,rf'S' -4 Kee vrr �i�e�v,�
f� Mw4,- o der-/z;lsty ✓ S '
❑ Yes O�No
❑ Yes No
�j Ye
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1 � M4�I Date:
��_ - 3/23/99

State of North Carolina
If
Department of Environment
i •
and Natural Resources
f
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
NCDENR
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
NORTH CARouNA DEPARTmE:NT OF
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
ENvIRDNmENT AND NmuRAL REsouRCE5
May 18, 1999
RECEIVrr%
CERTgTED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REOMTED
1% 2
Murphy Family Farms
FAYMEVILUE
18169 Arch McLean Rd.
F', OFF4CE
Wagram NC 28396
Subject: Notice of Violation and Revocation for Nonpayment
Dogwood Complex
Permit Number: AWS830009
Scotland County
Dear Murphy Family Farms:
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.10G, all animal operations who receive an animal
waste management system permit will be charged in each year of the term an annual permit fee. Annual permit fees are
billed following the issuance of the permit and then annually thereafter on the anniversary of that date. Your animal waste
management system permit was issued on 2/26/99.
Your annual permit fee for the period of 2/26199 - 2/25/2000 is $300.00. Your payment was due 4/17199.
Because this fee was not fully paid within 30 days after being billed, this letter initiates action to revoke the subject permit,
pursuant to 15 NCAC 2H .0205 (c) (4). and G.S. 143-215.1 (b) (3).
Effective 60 days from receipt of this notice, the subject permit is hereby revoked unless the required Annual
Animal Waste Management System Permit fee for your animal operation is received within that time. Operation of an
animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and is
subject to the assessment of a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per day. Your payment should be sent to:
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Budget Office
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
If you have any questions, please contact Fran McPherson at [phone] ext. 210.
re
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Non -Discharge Branch Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Fayetteville Regional Office
Scotland County Health Department
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled 110% post -consumer paper

i
Routine
Division of Soil and Water Conservation (:I Other Agency
12 Division of Water Quality
of
I Facility Number I
[] Registered F
Farm Name: ,...,i
Owner Name:......
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address:
Onsite Represent
Certified E3 Applied for Permit Permitted
r<Y ►�� � fJ 11n�f l � 'P L.�i
i
Certified Operator, ..... 4�. 1.0.................
Location of Farm:
Follow-up or DSWC review O Other �
Date of Inspection���
Time of Inspection Z' 24 hr. (hh:rnrn)
© Not O erational I Date Last Operated:
........••... County:.....>.l_.'P 1.....................................
..r .irxn.6........... Phone No:....................................
.................. Title:..,J.... . ............................ Phone No:...................................................
.. Lcou.%.................. ...........C�...) .1- ....r e.....................9FZZ�
xiu/L
rr
.......................................... Integrator :.......................�........................... .................
.....
re%...- ................. Operator Certification Number :............. ............................
Latitude Longitude r_�• �' ��'
Wean to Feeder �,�� ❑ Layer ❑Dairy
Feeder to Finish 14'X77h IM10 Non -Layer 1 10 Non-DairyI
Farrow to Wean x .A . ;x;
�'° e'
Farrow to FeederOther
ff
x
Farrow to Finish Total DestgttCapacty
Gilts
,.
Boars.,.'„.' s- >- x N'-z---''r;�p -. ••.
nber of I:agot►ns f Holduig Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Feld
x� ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System~ r �.
General
1.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
A No
2.
Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
0No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3.
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
4.
Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
No
5.
Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
PNo
��
maintenance/improvement?
\\
6.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
o
7/25/97

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No
Structures (Lag_oons.Holding Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes $No
S cture I S cture 2. Structure 3 /Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier: • ...,GJ i �; �i.lc�f ��
Freeboard (ft): ..._ .... L. /.... ..... ... ......� N .... ........ J z,`......
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes gNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste AppliCatioQ
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering Jat�ers of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ... �, .... .... r'4!................................ .
16. Do the receiving crops differ with ose designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No.violatioiis: or. defieieilcies. were: itoted;dtiring this.visit,- :YoJU:vd11 receive ito:ftirtlier.:
correspondepce dtiout-this:visit:: ........
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
*O
gNo
JgNo
gNo
5(No
KNo
KNo
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes j,No
❑ Yes (No

Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
@0 Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of MV0 inspection O Follow-up of I}SWC: review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number D
Time of Inspection % ' 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered Certified 13 Applied for Permit © Permitted 10 Not Operational Date bast Operated:
Farrel Name:......... .0. W.....................�i.�t 5.-r ...... County:....0 DTf.0......................................
Owner came:.. U1.S`........................ ...Wt t.....r43.1?�}.5.............. Phone No: ......
2................................
Facility Contact:..., �..y+!�.......Ci,l •jy.r....... Title:..... Phone i�o• ...�cc.,.` `�- :.............
ff r, y. r N...� r`........•...r...................... r
Mailing Address:......1.. �.. r �...... 1 r .......,L ' G e� vim.... .. {N. r.a .r'.� . ......-�---..... ...... 2 �3... 4
g .. a.r� G
�f r.
Onsite Representative:..__.C..r`�.....'r! tt................................ ntegrator•.....L k.r }................................_..
Certified Operator,..ir.I..G............................ Ea. —.6- - 4r ...........__.._.._...... Operator Certification Number.....j_...........
Location of Farm:
/5
Q.l........ &11 n±1 .....a
Latitude • =' " Longitude ' 4 44
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvernent?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in vaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon .system? Ul' yes, notify DWQ)
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons(holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes *o
❑ Yes 15No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes WNo
Continued on back

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Latmons.Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.1
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes (g No
❑ Yes 1(No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):..........3 .......................... .3................... Z,.._. ................................. .................... ........................ ............. .................................
...
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No
1 L Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? - ❑ Yes KNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering Ovate of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type CD �+ti- f1�cs+ 54 �J �GL.ti-S
............................................ - .......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AW IP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No.violationsor dei'icieneies.were noted;during' this"visit..You. 41 recei�e:noItirttier
-.•correspondeslceab"outthis:visit:�; :::::• -:� �.-:: : ;: •:-�; ::�; .............
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes R(No
❑ Yes IRNo
❑ Yes o
❑ YesfNo
❑ Yeso
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes PLNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
� '& Y 4a:'3:Ys. 'c. '�v� +. k•}",.r: N.t£ ""^' S> 'S -h 4'7 lY' -- +9'st xl, _.' �N+�k�' �%'.i `fi. '"$YS .:.�ina�63iy .
Cafs (refer.to queshoxt'#a.�Expla.tn any�YE53answers and/or ahyFrecoinmendaf�ons or arty -other cotntnentsv���
�lC�se drawings of�txcthty�ty better explaii`t situafionsri(uise addrt�onal,pages as-neCe.�sary�"�'� k���� �,�-�,�',',,��,
...d-
N1.Gt o, a e ed mat►-Ack. d.
7/25197
Reviewer/inspector Name 4 r g
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: z-
V 1 r

general information:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
On Site Representative:
Mating Address:_____
Physical Addy
ra"ay Nnntbtr:
Divisi—
on of Environmental Management g 3
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Reonrd
. I)M:? [ I -i
Tune: 4 -1 o—
mtr s�
,ram Phone jNo• fa - 6133
eV_ teg,TatOS: i�VY1114n
M,1 ,_ _ S
Operation Description; (ba-srd on design eharactr�)
Type of Swint No. of AmAnU I ype of PvuWy No. of MimaLt Type of CMIc No. ofAAbndU
0 saw G taya - ..�... 0 Dairy
O Naxsy 0 Bed
O Feeda
Od wrType of Live$zWk i L..' Aru ber of Animgds. !6 0 0 0 - --
Number of Lagoons: l (inclnle in the Drawings and 4bsrrvatioas the fwboard ofeaeb Lgoaoj'`'''F
Facility TniAtdon.*
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than I�foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Yes ❑
N610
Is seepage observed from the.lagoon?:
Yes ©
NoO
Is erosion obsernd?:
Yes D
Nos
Is any discharge observed?
Yes 0
NOM
O Man-ade 0 Not Man -mods
Cover CrVP
Does the facility need more acmage for spraying?:
Yes D
No,4
Does the cover crop Deed isnprovenxW?:
Yes ©.
No1M
(list the crops whicA need iVro�ent)
7
``,�,,,�,���,,..
ow t r• r R. ""' �b"�
Setback C*eda
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application? Yes 0 Nod
Is a well located within 100 foci of waste application? Yes O Norm
Is animal waste stockpiled. within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes ❑ No�b
'Is animal waste lard applied of spray irrigated within 25 feu of Blue Line Stream? Yes 0 NOP
A01— Janes 17p% _ •'•- _ !-

MQiitltR�Ct •
Does the facility maintenancm need improvanent? Yes 0 Np0-
r
- Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes O Npa-
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes 0 N9Z
Did the faulty faM to have a copy offhe Animal Waste Management Plan on ft? Yes O N4
Explain any Yes answem• .
Signamte• Date• j9 C
cc Fhairy A sesanew Unit Use Affad"eno rNeedcd
3-F-
• � �/�i •�J :mot • - ... _ � �. ��•_�w.. ��.�.�. =w �� � -2 !• `j.rw� �!�'wwr"'� � �l :.
AOI - Jaauart l7jW -

racuuy hUM"r.
Division of Environmental Management V3 7 (
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
. � Dafle., _ �'
IL
'I"ime. E, Eo
---
General Inflonmado.,
Y FAM Name: OwnerName: u r
Oo Site Representative• r '
Marling Address:, _ S.� (o `� A r
Physical
Qa�mty:
ne No• 40
L ear„
Latitude: ► ! Longitude:
ration Description: (based on design charaeftri0m)
at of Swiw No. o A+eiaeab Q ��Poalvy No. of A iawk � No. ojMimU
"t:nery D NOD-L" r D Baef
D Feeder
OmerType of Ifvamut Mamber of Animals:
Number of lagoons:(inclode in the Drawinp and Obsemtions the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility Tnson:
Lagoon -
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Yes O
We
Is seepage observed from the.lagoon?:
Yes i]
Not
Is erosion observedt
Yes O
Mt
Is any discharge observed?
Yes ❑
N0.0
O Afan4rsade O Not Aran, *
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Yes 0
No
Does the cover Crop need improvement?:
Yes D
No
(list the turps which need iVrovuuw)
Chap type: � Acreage:
Setback C iterfa
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste appticadoa?
Yes O
Not
•
Is a wtU located within 100 feet of waste applicatioa?
Yes 0
N
Is animal waste stockp0ed within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes 0
N
Is animal waste land applied of spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
Yes 0
No

M�ttllQACt
Does the facility Maintenance need imptvvemew Yes 0 No�?
'.` h there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes 0 NOM—
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes 0 No l-
+� Did the facMty fail to have a copy of ft Animal Waste Managernent Play on dw? Yes D No40--
Explain any Yes answers•
Sigaararc: ' Date: 7
Use Anadownu IrJVee&d
cc facility Arms v Unit
Draffingl gr Qbsemllonc
- � �N i -{1 .•rK •
AOI — lanuM717,U%
' .., .. �w...ly •.,�•.�•.� a�wr .�. rn•rw..l�•!•1rr�r!!*.�Rf•Nwr.A�Rr v.ww w'1R�.

! State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
' VA,
vo
AV4
OWN% 00ft"N000
IDEHNR
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 16, 1995
Mr. Eddie Hedgepeth
Dogwood Farms (Murphy)
18169 Arch McLean Road
Wagram, NC 28396
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
COUNTY: Scotland
Dear Mr. Hedgepeth:
On August 15, 1995, an inspection of your animal operation was
performed by the Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). Please find
enclosed a copy of our Compliance Inspection Report for your
information. It is the opinion of this office that this facility
is in compliance with 15A NCAC 2H, Part .0217, and that Animal
Waste Management is being properly performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please
feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
aj
D. T. Jones
Chemist
DTJ/bjs
Enclosure
cc: Facility Compliance Group
Wachovia Building. Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone] FAX 91a-486-0707
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

1
I2�/.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
t
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
J County 5eell,44'41
Dear:
�ccS t�',flrs
On an inspection of your animal operation was performed by the
Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). Please find enclosed a copy of our
Compliance Inspection Report for your information. It is the opinion of this
office that this facility is in compliance with 15A NCAC 2H, Part .0217, and
that Animal Waste Management is being properly performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact
me at [phone].
Enclosure
cc: Facility Compliance Group
Sincerely,
bra dy—B
E v�ir g1ftL

Site Requires immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENMONTMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: r / , 1995
Time: _ %;?-A2
Farm Name/Owne
Mailing Address:
County:
Integrator: u x
On Site Representative:
Physical Address/Location: F2t',f W�yr l
Phone:
_ Phone:'?/0 ; y0/, ye 9-4
C- Ad)Co/--2-/t-14
Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: D Number of Animals on Site: SGd U
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: .
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: t. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or& Was any erosion obsery ? Yes o(�Y'
Is adequate land available for spray? s or No Is the cover crop adequate? a or No
Crop(s) being utilized: di✓ — CG
Does the facility rueet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?ffR or No
100 Feet from Wells? es r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or V&
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes o N
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes ocIf Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)?9
or No
Additional Comments:
Inspector Name - Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, AIFX;WA
Health and Natural Resources • •
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor 1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 16, 1995
Mr. Eddie Hedgepeth
Dogwood Farms (Murphy)
18169 Arch McLean Road
Wagram, NC 28396
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
COUNTY: Scotland
Dear Mr. Hedgepeth:
On August 15, 1995, an inspection of your animal operation was
performed by the Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). Please find
enclosed a copy of our Compliance Inspection Report for your
information. It is the opinion of this office that this facility
is in compliance with 15A NCAC 2H, Part .0217, and that Animal
Waste Management is being properly performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please
feel free to contact me at [phone].
SincerelyM'j lult-t,
D. T. Jones
Chemist
DTJ/bjs
Enclosure
cc: Facility Compliance Group
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Site Requires iramediate Attention:
Facility No.,
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMEi\7
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: , 1995
Time: G
Farm Narne/Oww
Mailing Address: ,1.X / j 7 f .aa A'l --lC&Ll + 40""61 AK it L ,c a a 7( _
County:
Integrator: u ruh Phone:
On Site Representative. IkWel Phone: Q/o '2 9�r Y(-' �
Physical Address/Location: F121,417 �� �c� �c. fljcn, /- try,r�,'lc �Gr��✓/1��._vti4y iy4-i.
/y1-i le4y % � � � /' 2- �1. %� f u ��yr�. frc.✓I�l
it--v,Nr5 Arfh4
Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle —
Design Capacity: 17,0 Number of Animals on Site: _ G �116 (M y
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number. ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: —' ' —"
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: 1--�4—Ft Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes oro Was any erosion obsery ? Yes 00
Is adequate land available for spray? s or No Is the cover crop adequate? LY#or No
Crop(s) being utilized: -
Does the facility n ieet SCS minimuri setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?ffe3 or No
100 Feet from Wells? �eir No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or&
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes c No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate w to management rec—orrds (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)?(Yet or No
Additional Comments:
� r
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.

V.
4
„� state of North Carolina
Department of Environment,FW'A
Health and Natural Resources ` • 0
Division of Water Quality f
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary IDP.HNF;Z
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 5, 1997
Dr. Garth Boyd
Murphy Family Farms
P.O. Box 759
Rose Hill, NC 29458
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Dogwood Farm
Registration No. 83-20
Scotland County
Dear Dr. Boyd:
On February 4, 1997, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of
Water Quality inspected the Dogwood Farm facility. It was observed that animal waste had
run-off from one of the irrigation fields designated in your waste management plan. Thus
nm-off had the potential of entering waters of the State, namely Big Shoeheel Creek,
however; no waste was observed entering the creek at the time of the inspection.
The inspection revealed that the spray gun had been located in an area where the soils
were too saturated to receive the amount of waste being applied resulting in run off. The
waste material was draining out of the field into the woods. It was determined during the
inspection that the waste material did not enter waters of the State and waste did not leave
farm property.
In a conversation with Mr. Eric Ferrell (the certified operator for the facility); he
informed us of several improvements planned to prevent a reoccurrance of this situation.
Among the proposed improvements, was a plan to fill the seasonally wet area adjacent to
Arch McLean Road. Also, Mr. Ferrell stated that the irrigation lane beside the woods where
the nn-off occurred will be managed more carefully in the future. We discussed lagoon
levels on the Dogwood Farm during the investigation and he informed us that all the lagoons
had fiveboar+d levels of approximately 20 to 23 inches. We recommend that future
application events are carefully monitored and scheduled during appropriate weather
conditions to avoid run-off problems.
P.O. Box 29WS. �� FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Caroana 27626-0= NrdfC An Equal Opport�/Aff6nwfte Action Ernplolw
Telephone [phone]% recycles/ 10% post -col sffner paper

Page 2
Dr. Boyd
3l5197
Please provide a written response to this office on or before March 16, 1997 as to the
actions taken or proposed to be taken to resolve this deficiency. Nothing in this lei should
be taken as absolving this facility of the responsibility and liability of any violations that have
or may result from these deficiencies.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Bob Heath or John Hasty at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
Regional SWervisor
cc: Operations Branch
Central Files
Chris Walling - FRO DSW
Banyan Anderson - Scotland County MRCS
Mr. Eric Ferrell - Murphy Family Farms

General Infan nation:
Farm Nam•
Owner Name:__ N
On Site Representedw
Mailing Address: f % I
Physical
Division of Environmental Management $-3�
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Reoar+d
Time: I;
to; 9-7G-S335`
Latitude: I I Longitude:
QDeration Descrlption; (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine Nov. SAninab
0 e of Poultry No. of Animals G of Caine
No, of Afthnals
�
asm _ Lyer
0 Nmay D N=-L" r D Bxf'
O F60da
[0%herType of liwstoek Ntmber of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: (imiude in the Drawings and Observations the fen eboar+d of each Lgoaa)
Lagoon
1s lagoon(s) freeboard less than I foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Yes 0
NoZ
Is seepage observed from the. lagoon?:
Yes 0
No
Is erosion observed?:
Yes 0
N
Is any discharge observed?
Yes D
No
0 Man -wade Q Not man -node
Cover &V
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Yes U
NoX
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
Yes 0
. Nok
(list the crops which need infnmmu t)
CM LEA C. Acreage: d# 3 fW-rr"s
qw: p?sa-320
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located wi" 200 feet of waste application?
Yes 0
Nol
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Yes ❑
Not
Is animal waste stockpiled. within IOO feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes ❑
N075
Is animal waste land applied of spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
Yes 0
14019
AOI - January 17JL9l6

Ala�ltteaece
Does the faciity muntenanae need irnprovrmeat? Yes D Nq�g
b them evidence of past discharge from say part of the operation? Yes p MAD
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes 0 ;7a
Did the fac�ity fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on du? Yes 0
Explain any Yes answers; .
Signature: _ _�.._ Date'_
cc Facility Aaselonew UA& ilst Atrachn+r,sss �Nssded
win b e
• •♦(ir !.' •tie
Aor - Tanuw7174M