780093_INSPECTIONS_20171231

I
Inf- -mation contained in this database is from non agency sources and is considered unconfirmed.
Animal Operation Telephone Log
DWQ Facility Number 78 — g3
Farm Name 17073 I
Caller's Name erry Trier
® Reporting O Complaint
Caller's Phone # [phone]
Access to Farm
Farm Accessible
from main road 10 Yes O No
Animal Population
Confined O Yes O No
DePoP 10 Yes O No
Feed Available 10 Yes O No
Mortality O Yes O No
Sprav Availability
Pumping
Equipment
10 Yes O No
Available
O Yes O No
Fields
Date 9/8/2004
Time 5:20pm
Control Number 617
Region FRO
Lagoon Questions
Breached
10 Yes O No
Inundated
10 Yes O No
Overtopped
10 Yes O No
Water on
O Yes O No
Outside Wall
Dike Conditions
O Yes O No
Freeboard Level
Freeboard
Plan Due Date Date Plan Date Freeboard
Inches
(? equals blank) Received level OK
Lagoon' 17
9/10/2004 9/10/2004
Lagoon2
Lagoon3
Lagoon4
I
Lagoons
Lagoon6
Advised to send 30 day POA.
`...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.r_ n
-........�..................t.
r..-........
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
-------------------------------------------------.................................................... ........ .... .-..--....... .....................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
person taking cal! Larry Bayley
-r
. i.r _ .-../ f :./'�-�C..j3. : .'.,: SA':.- i vC�'u, w"{1 t.1 ?'+S y+i`-.•� v�f6:, L.2 � '_-SibS'.
Comments2

Information contained in this database is from non agency sources and is considered unconfirmed.
z
Animal Operation Telephone Log
DWQ Facility Number 78 — 93
Farm Name I7073
Caller's Name Perry Trier
® Reporting 0 Complaint
Caller's Phone # [phone]
Access to Farm
Farm Accessible
from main road O Yes O No
Animal Population
Confined 10 Yes O No
Depop 10 Yes O No
Feed Available 10 Yes O No
Mortality 10 Yes O No
Spray Availability
Pumping
Equipment
10 Yes O No
Available
O Yes 0 No
Fields
ised to send 30 day POA.
---------------- ---------..--...........----------...........................-..-..
...... ......=". A .......................... I....................
Date 9/8/2004
Time 5:20pm
Control Number 617
Region FRO
LaLmn Questions
Breached
JOYes O No
Inundated
10 Yes 0 No
Overtopped
O Yes O No
Water on
O Yes O No
Outside Wall
Dike Conditions
10 Yes O No
Freeboard Level
Freeboard
Plan Due Date Date Plan Date Freeboard
Inches
(? equals blank) Received Level OK
Lagoonl 17
9/10/2004 9/10/2004
0
Lagoon2
I�
Lagoon3 u
I�
Lagoon4l�
I�
Lagoons
Lagoons
y4`l,- it ar :a.C..:i,✓..., wr �. -.. _ . � -... .' _ ., ...:r ...... ;>,e.fw ..:-:� ��. _ ... ..v - . c
,g calEI,arry Baxley
-
,r
Comments2

PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACI
Facility Number: 78-93 County: Robeson
Facility Name: 7073
Certified Operator Name: Jimmy Oxendine Operator Number: 17650
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon Name/ID: 7073
Spillway(Y or N): N
Level(inches): 17
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWO prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
'Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
'if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 09/10/2004
hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Murphy -Brown, Lf�C L'burg Division Phone: [phone]
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
owgm Date: 09/10/2004
ityOfn'e rfaanager (signature)
RECEIVED
SEP 13 2004
OW - FAYETt1: IU RMOM OIIRIE

r
11. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: 7073
line m = 1704.2 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID:
line m =
Ib PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line rn =
lb PAN
n.lines1+2+3+4+5+6= 1704.2lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD_ DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT RE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
- rzA—"
PAN balance
(lb/acre)
L T6TALPAN
BALANCE FOR
FI•
columnrxs
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all Fields (sum of column t) = 4908.2 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = 1704.2 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = 4908.2 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -3204 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receivin facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): 7073
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 17.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19A inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 2.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 225496 ft'
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3 281118 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 290117 ft3
h. current herd # 8$00 certified herd #1 8800
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i +j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 08/11 /2004
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
290117 ft'
® ft3
135333 ft3
530394 gallons
2.10 Ibs/1000 gal.
1704.2 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00

(Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit ® Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number I Date of Visit: Time:
t Not - erational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: _ 'r-rCA1 �S �_ LA C. County. an kaal InF[� b
Owner Name: L:G rro l C-f�i��'3 Phone No:
Mailing Address: P,. Dj j3c-'1C g,s-(, 2_ g 3'F
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: ti L „fee cL i. e
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator: (' C- pn! It S
Operator Certification Number:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 4 Longitude ' 1
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Ca acid• Population Poultry Ca ackv Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder 10 Laver ❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish I ID Non -Laver ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrov, to Wean
❑ Farrow' to Feeder ❑Other
�Fauowto Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons I ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ S ray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps LON9 Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges 8 Stream lmp2cts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge orizinated at. ❑ Lazoon ❑ Sprav Field ❑ Other
a_ If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): '3S
05103101 3(_
❑ Yes ER No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Continued

kti
!i
Facility Number: j Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes [;TNO
seepage, etc.) �"
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes PNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes .@ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Q No
1. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes [5jTlo
12_ Crop type I3T,4 !2 . S
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes Wo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes [)4
``N��o
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? El}�NYes o
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Qa No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
EtNo
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
M, No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
17-1 No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
QaJNo
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
9No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit
Comments (refeir to que f on ) ' Ezplatn any YES answers and/or,any r"ecommenaations or any other coimments hlu -
drawtn s of faeiltty to better a lam situations. use addrteanal a es a
;Use g ap ( p g F s,necessarv}:, ❑Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
(.t �G. 4 ,•� e �►-eS� rt a v`k- r% i n z'AZ / 03 St
Reviewer/Inspector Name te­
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: [ z D
05103101 1 Continued

}-P-5i 3
Facility Number:
Date of Inspection
dor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan biade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
05103101
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes W No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes FL] No
❑ Yes ❑ No

Information contained in this database is from non agency sources and is considered unconfirmed.
Animal Operation _Telephone Log
DWQ Facility Number 78 93
Farm Name 17073 1
Caller's Name Dawn Williamson
10 Reporting O Complaint
Caller's Phone # email
Access to Farm
Farm Accessible
from main road 10 Yes O No
Animal Population
Confined 10 Yes O No
Depop 10 Yes O NO
Feed Available JOYes ONO
Mortality 10Yes ONO
Spill Availability
Pumping
Equipment
10 Yes O No
Available
O Yes O No
Fields
Date 7-8-2003
Time :OOpm
Control Number 13478
Region JFRO
Laeoon Ouestions
Breached
O Yes ONO
Inundated
10 Yes O No
Overtopped
10 Yes O No
Water on
O Yes O No
Outside Wall
Dike Conditions
O Yes O No
Freeboard Le -el
Freeboard
Plan Due Date Date Plan Date Freeboard
Inches
(? equals blank) Received Level OK
Lagoon4 i8"
7/10/2003 7- 9-0-9
1
Lagoon2
Lagooll
Lagooll
Lagoons
Lagooll
B �-
Ms Williamson is sending in a POA and asked her to report when out of the red.
.................................................................................................................................................."........................---.--_-......--'-'-.................
....................................................................................................................................................................................I.-'---'.......'-'"•"'-•'•'
.................. ........... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
..
Ic, � �n �* 1x �.-,. l�?,;:_(ti:-v._`:�- e �.: e,.....-E;S.1:4.�;;4�ils ;[::� ;w;'...r}-.., ,1' ... .'vet;lr,1�.:.:;�:�:J.`.y_:}•:.1'r;y:•:si'..•.i�,'ai:Diu.•Y:-.%=:^:c:c-Y:.}•'.;:'.'Y:.-yS.l'Ct.Y
person;taking ;call "< Larry~ Baxley
rt tf l- F i r � t aL+�v�>t;. r- 1 :t.. ., � � sa trait., t,`�.::i��• f r<,S.. i=i c i i •'-L�,'�L�:.:3r„1� tt� l
e hfF:f, r ? %-�. - ��' .5,
Commell

Jul Q8 03 05:04p MURPHY-BROWN 9102933138 p.18
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 78-93 County: Robeson
Facility Name; 7073
Certified Operator Name: Jimmy Oxendine Operator Number: 17650
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon NamellD: 7073
Spillway(Y or N): N
Level(inches): 18
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
x Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
`if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
1 hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Murphy -Brown, LLC L'burg Division Phone: [phone]
�j Facility Owner/Manager (print)
l -- _ �� ; 1-y►... r Date:
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
Nl_,� aV (I- t' L, I

Jul 08 03 05:04p MURPHY-BROWN 9102933138 p.19
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIE:
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelldentifier (ID). 7073
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1.0 inches
_...ter..
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 225496 ft2
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 galionslfe 140559 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 1 290117 ft'
h. current herd #F___8_8_0_0_1 certified herd #1 8800
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 290117 fe
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated F 06/16/2003
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
1 1ft3
135333 ft3
530394 gallons
2.30 Ibsl1000 gal.
1543.2 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121I00

Jul 08 03 05:05p MURPHY-BROWN
9102933138
p. 20
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR./24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: 7073
line m = 1543.2 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure 1D:
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 1543.2lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWP
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD
• • f • f OTALPAN u.spplica�onvvindow'
PAN balance BALANCE FOR
• w
columnrxs
•7L01U LUi1 UI Il Li UP CIIUIi iy dppiIL;dLl )fI VOL= UI IIVAL UI Up apptivatiurl utryII111t11C,J. UdIC 1Ui a Ii6u1G
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 5060.0 Ib. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
W. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 1543.2 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

Jul 08 03 05:04 MURPHY-BROWN
9102933138 p.21
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section IIIJ =
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _
5060.0 lb. PAN
-3517 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. It line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump S haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
'based on new information. If new fields are to be induded as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
PnA 130 Dav) 2121100

14.
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1f ? Time:
k Facility Number "I• i
tro N t Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ❑ Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: W' Count: ,Pn 2i]
Owner Name: Q,_rf D 1 i S Phone No: q 1 U ' ?Y-' - S �37-
Al2iling Address: F_ 1 GK R 5 C. 2 8.-1 q 8
Facility Contact: __ f� C r C,c f .. S Title: _ LA M Phone No:
- c
Onsite Representative. S Integrator: {'_e .r'PQ i(�r
e—
Certified Operator. Operator Certification number: 1 ?-�.�f�
Location of Farm:
Off- Gx- SX- ll ,'ti „xe r C'lkr-. Ocff � w �, l3 D f- S,414, •
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 4 " Longitude `
Design Current
Swine Canacith Pnnolatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
e6O
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca adty Population
❑ Laver I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Laver I on -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oen Area JE3 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges 8- Stream Impacts
1. Is anv discharge observed from any part of the operation?
- - ❑ Yes PNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in ealimin?
d. Does discharge b,. ass a lagoon system? (Ifves, noti& DWQ) El Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes q No
3- Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection S '%atment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): 2Lo
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection I rr f-
5. Arc there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9_ Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
❑ Yes W No
❑ Yes [�i No
❑ Yes q No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 6No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
(9 No
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Eallo
Reauired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Q No
l8.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
© No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20.
is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes [� No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Co en {refer #o n` es6o # E` lath an�gYES answers andlor,:an ecom ieadaddris'or an 'other comma s. �k �'
Use drawingstaf fa sty to better�explam sdnabans: (use addtponal pages as necessary}
"... a k,a Field Co
❑Final Notes
�b 1 rr 4,4ei.. n.Cor� 0.Uci.�'(KA,(e rc riew -- fGiL�6 ari
pt J �F d: dh!+ - - N� o 4 � Des Q c -xj(,u r t�s c,� c<1-
D-V�' Ai
Reviewer/Inspector Name
�. .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: ( 03

Facility Number: — " 3 Hate of Inspection 1�3
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharec at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours''
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e_ residue on neighboring vegetation. asphalt.
roads. building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. lVere any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts. missing or
or broken fan blade(s). inoperable shutters. etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerryed fill pipe or a permanentltemporary cover?
and/or
❑ Yes W No
❑ Yes ER No
❑ Yes ER No
❑ Yes P ,No
❑ Yes [ No
❑ 1.es do
❑ Yes \o
O5103101

\1
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 4 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facilitv Number hate of Visit: !32 Time:= 3 �
Not O erational BelaR- Threshold
Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date bast Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: County: JO)
Owner Name: _ - .Sa..., Phone No: 9/0 _2 9�7
Mailing Address: �,. 7�/. iCD�.E «�/�{� GT JP7
,, / �- 7'
Facility Contact: .f l�0 // l 1j Title: Phone
No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
r
Certified Operator: kTi�.✓.� Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
[I Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 �• �" Longitude ' 1
Design Current
_ 5wttte
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
,? ❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Soars
❑ Su N mber'of ]Lagoons . C-Holdin`gYonds'/ Sohd Traps. u ❑ No
:.Current - Design Current
w Po laEiba. _. =Cattle Ca arty '' ll'o " tiDairy
lattaa
Total I?es�gn Capactty _.-"" i
- m =T6W SSLW
Drains Present ❑ La oon Area 10 S ray° Meld Area=
Vaste Management Svstem L
Dischay & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4_ Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
u H
Freeboard (inches): / p
05103107
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes tgNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ Yes
§�No
❑ Yes
P No
❑ Yes
No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: 7,? — 9,3
Date of Inspection 0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage. etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9- Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes E ,No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes IRNo
11. Is there evidence
//of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ANo
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes IgNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes VNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 91 No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes WNo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes XNo
Required Records & Documents
IT
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
GrNo
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WIT, checklists, des m!pketc.)
❑Yes
tNo
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20.
is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
PNo
21-
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
gNo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
RNo
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
P No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
l'_V1No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
07No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Gommeots (refer toF;quesiiii): ,EirpEain slay YES angers andfor.'aay recontunettdatioas'or any athtr comments �" ,.
Use drawir>gs of faaltty to:better ezplaus srwattotas. {Qse addrteott$I pages ss necessary) m [ Field Conv ❑ Final Note- -'
-
c..s ��;2� L✓.z -z-
H,
Reviewer/Inspector Name -
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Dumber: 7 — � date of Inspection 0
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
2$. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e_ broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/tempormy cover?
05103101
❑ Yes FJNo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes ) ] No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes 9NO

_ Dtvtsion of Wafer Quality , s �. � _
Dtves;on of Sail and Water Consetwateon
D E?tt�er.'Agency _
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit routine O Complaint 0 Follow up ' O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
E: Facility Number % Date of Visit: Z -d Time: E== Printed on: 7/21/2000
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date bast Operated or Above Threshold: ..........
FarmName:............74.7.3..................................................................................... County:...A-1-JR-f....?....:....................................................
I
Owner Name: r a f 1 f�• Phone No
... oe................................................
Facility Contact.4.Lf.5.....eP� ro?.5....................Title: ill.t....... l..a. ...................... Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ........................ ........................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: _. . Integrator:.._....
Certified Operator:............}.+?......................K...._......�.h.................... Operator Certification Number:.............................._.._........
Location "of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude
r
-Deiiga Current " Design Current Destgq Curacut
5witte _ Capacity Population Poultry Ca aci Po ulaaon Cattle . Po .. twti
Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ❑Dairy
Feeder to Finish 00 ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
s ` Farrow to Feed 10 Other
Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
Gi
lts
Boars Total SSL`W
LEE*
mberdll,agpons: Subsurface Drains Present Lag�nn Area Spray Field Area
ag Pomis'1SoltdTtraps ` No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ANO
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon [ISpray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'' ❑ Yes XNo
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes �"o
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier. .......... .
........................ ..
Freeboard (inches): 39,
5100
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes 4Na
❑ Yes *NO
[:]Yes No
Structure b
Continued on back

9-3
Facility Number: 7 — Date of Inspection I 3-7Z-O Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? {ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes �No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes VNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes EQNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes 4 No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 4 No
11. Is there evidence of over application? [� Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes IgNo
12. Crop type I-PrNLrj"_ 444 / JA4, t4rcu'n, 1'.4lSr
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with tho494esignated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
'\No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
�No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
`Yes
❑ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
JANo
Reuuired
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Q No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
fiANo
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
1P No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
❑ Yes
kyNo
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
9No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
Po
Rio vigiatiq[>ls.. drr#.... ies ire ngted dikrtng #hls:vPit: You will receive r. fui�titer. .
rorresporideiice. abo—Uk this visit:
Commerets.(refer to gnestian #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations oc_any oftier cotnmentsr -"
Use draw ig s of facility to Better explain situations {use g,.__ ,oua! pages as necessary} � t
r�/ 11 _ _ mm �j
er S QrG 5c ff��o AL
o,ti.���--
Reviewer/Inspector Name�,� ILL
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: s Zlv - a/ 5100

Facility Number — 9 Date n#' 1 ��spcction Printed on: 7I2112000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes �No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes �o
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes �No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes I�No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes —
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional ornments an orDrawings:.
J
5100

z
Routine 0 Com faint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-u of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number FDateof Inspectionof Inspection r 0 24 hr. (hh:mm}
Permitted 0 Certified 0 /C�on--d7itionally Certified © Registered 0 Not O rational Date Last Operated:
.. Farm Name: ............... .- I.L.....3....................... I............ ............. County:.......... �.n5�'------------ ................. .....
.
Owner Name:...... !TT'Q.. �.15.....-.... lX_? .5 ....-i �=........... Phone No:........ .[�z.. _. .� Q........................................
Facility Contact: ...... L �.5..... ._ .......Title: ............. Phone No. ............
Mailing Address:....... ..... l—LLA4112.1:.............................................. ..............�.q.+�`. N ... ..
Onsite Representative: �. e �-. ............................ Integrator:.................. -- -----------
_ ._........... .
Certified Operator: .......Y i Operator Certification Number:
JLocation of Farm:
Latitude Longitude =' =` 0« •
Design Currertf - = Design Current : = Design Current
$wine Capacity, Population Poyltiy ' Capacity.-: Popula6nn _Cattle Capacity, Popiiiatlon
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
-
arrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
-0 Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
- ` ❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes kNo
❑ Yes kNo
❑ Yes biNo
❑ Yes t No
❑ Yes Dg No
❑ Yes J� No
❑ Yes 'kNo
Structure 5
Identifier: 11
Freeboard (inches): ......,^.?.....................................
..................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes �No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of inspection
6_ Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7_ Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenarice/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste j%ppliciltion
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence ofjo,ver application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12- Crop type 0 /Ludes kA*tea � 57N . (� r-a n
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated fir�the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16- Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Ree( uired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24- Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�3'�io violations:oi def eiencie9 *r Ire pQted• during this -visit: - You will•reeeiye Rio fui�thtr •
cor:resporidence: abotilr this visit. ................ ...............:: :
L_6-�tH n.ue
c6,4-ar,
Pde- raII
Way- Q-k- n
�a,J /'V lr Kf 9ry^-''
{use additional pages s neces a
*P7Xy ed (if M
. ❑ Yes 9No
r Oce-
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes WO
❑ Yes Kj No
❑ Yes Pro
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes kNo
❑ Yes lgNo
❑ Yes ELNo
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes Z_No
❑ Yes 14 No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes Al No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes ff_No
❑ Yes 2�wo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes V-No
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 6 —Z,?I
3/23/99

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below t" Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan biade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes t
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentltemporary cover? Yes ❑ No

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Carroll's Foods Inc
7073
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear Carroll's Foods Inc:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
LL E-CEIV D
1;:1-N s 2000
FAYET T EVILLE
REG. OFFICE
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 78-93
Robeson County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan_
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludgestresiduals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR], SLUR2,
SLDI , and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincere] ,
.,� Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Robeson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 'Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Carroll's Foods Inc
7073
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw NC 29398
Dear Carroll's Foods Inc:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NA;ruRAL RESOURCES
December 6,1999
r
F vI �,� I ����--� l i.rr - _
1999
FREE C-
Subject: Conditional Approval
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 78-93
Robeson County
Our records indicate that your facility was conditionally certified in order to fulfill the requirements
of completion of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan Certification. This letter is to inform you
of your unresolved conditional approval status. Any facility receiving a conditional approval must notify
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) in writing within 15 days after the date that the work needed to resolve the
conditional certification has been completed. Any failure to notify DWQ as required, subjects the owner to
an enforcement action. As of December 6, 1999, we have no record of any information from you, advising
us of the status of your conditional approval. Therefore, please fill out the attached form and have your
technical specialist and landowner sign the form in the appropriate areas.
The completed form must be submitted to this office on or before 45 days of receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or liability
for failure to provide DWQ with proper notification of your conditional certification status or possible failure
to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste management plan by
December 31, 1997.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]
extension 571.
Sincerely,
Sonya L. OAvant
Environmental Engineer
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Robeson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number I [ M.1 Leo f I nspvcfion
I Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:m
IP(Permitted 0 Certified E3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered JE3 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..........................
FarmName: ... .... 7.0-73 ................................ .................................................. County : ............... ........... 11.1 .......
Owner Name: ... Phone No: ........................
;y
Facility Contact: ....................................... ./:� — ----------------- Title: "5 .......... ......................... Phone No: ............
Mailing Address:
6 ... .... ....................................................... ......................... 5a-,-Y- /U Q . ........ 28y!��
. ................................ ... ................
Onsite Representative: ... Le-5 ..... . .................. Inteurator: ...............
Certified Operator.....Number:.............................-........... ---- ........... .............. Operator Certification .. .................. ...................... ... .............. ..
Location of Farm-
............................. ........................................ I-- ................................................................................ .... .............. I-- ..................................................... I. —I ............................ ....
.......................................................................... I ...... I ...................... 11 ............. I ... I ....................... - .............................................................................................
Latitude 0 4 .4 Longitude 0 4 44
Swine Capacity Population
El Wean to Feeder
UrF—,,d,, to Finish
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Poultry Capacity Population
1[] Layer I I
JE] Non -Layer
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
ED Dairy
ID Non -Dairy
IF] Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons FE—ISubsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps JE3 No Liquid Waste Management System I
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I- Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: [] Lagoon C] Spray Field E] Other
a. It'discharge is observed, was the conveyance than -made'?
h. It'discharge is observed. did it reach: [:] Surface Waters [] Waters of the State
c. li'discharoe is observed. what is the esfiniated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than froth a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'?
r"
Structure I
Identifier:
to
Freeboard (inches): ...... ... ........................
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
0 Yes No
El Yes
ANo
El Yes
, No
Af
Ej Yes
0 No
E] Yes [K No
0 Yes KNo
D Yes kNo
Structure 6
1/6/99 Continued on back

•,
Facility Number: gr — q3
Date of Inspection r
5.
Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
f] Yes
No
seepage, etc.)
6.
Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑Yes
�No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
►+I `�`
• immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7-
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
8.
Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
9.
Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
❑ Yes
No
Wastc Application
10-
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
4No
11.
is there evidence of over application) ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
❑ Yes
Q No
12,
��rw�!!<1...11<'�
Crop type .............. ...... ............-.......................................................................................-.........----•--.....................
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
9Q No
14.
Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint)
❑ Yes
Od No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
OdNo
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
J No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
ONo
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
�No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
�No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
allo
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes � No
24- Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes Id No
: MD'violitions'ar deficiencies .were noted during Ais.visii:. You wi llfri� eive n6 NriEier. -. '
egrtrespa idence; abbot; this :visit.; ; ; ; ; :: ; ; _ ; ; ; ; ;
Comments.{refer to question #): Explain-aity YES answers and/or any....recommendations or any other comments
Use drawin s'of facility to better explain'situations. (use additional pages as necessary) 1,, r
_7�� s r5 Q Aet i
/s 27
7a
ND h-t'r 74;0� e r4 rrk ed Aer� el'�
1
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ^ _� . !&:: L- — Date: __3 _ZV-gY 1116/99

State of North Carolina RECEIVED
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources JUL 2 3 1998
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor FAYETTEViLLE
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary [AEG. OFFICE
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 26, 1998
Carroll's Foods Inc.
7073
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw NC 28398
if 0
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANP NATURAL RE50URCE5
Subject: Reissuance of Certificate of Coverage
No,AWS780093
7073
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and
Application System
Robeson County
Dear Carroll's Foods Inc.:
The Division of Water Quality modified the Swine Waste Operation General Permit originally issued to
this facility on July 28, 1997. In accordance with the issuance of the revised General Permit, we are
forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Carroll's Foods Inc., authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but
not limited to, the management of animal waste from the 7073, located in Robeson County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 8800 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003, and shall hereby void
COC No AWS780093 dated July 28, 1997. The COC shall hereby incorporate by reference any specific
conditions of the previous COC issued to this facility. The purpose of this COC is to allow coverage
under the revised General Permit. Please review the revised General Permit (enclosed) and pay
particular attention to Condition II.10 regarding tree removal from lagoon embankments, Condition Ill.1
regarding inspection frequency of the waste treatment, storage and collection system and Condition II1.6
regarding notification requirements for system failures, spills and emergencies. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycledl 10% past -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS780093
7073
Page 2
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal_ This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable_ A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact Katharine Keaton at [phone] ext. 533.
erely,
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Robeson County Health Department
Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Robeson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

[] Division of Soil and Water Conservation 13 Other Agency
® Division of Water Quality
14P Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DIVO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection I �- �
Facility Number Time of Inspection 11,Q %P7 o 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered IN Certiijfiedh 0 Applied for Permit 'Permitted 0 Not Operational Date Last Operated:.......... -
Farm Marne l ! 3 County :.................. .J...�.......--•--.........................
....................... 0--.... ...................................................................-----......
Owner name:.......... Ql!'o.l�. S. ..�f1 a .................... Phone No: J �................................... 9v.�.�....I.............
..... y ........ ... .......... ..
Facility Contact:.. ..L.�S...J..C......�7ff... . Title •................................. .......................... Phone No:..............................----.................
pp rr NC a 5
Mailing Address: ......... I�.a.`....--- fctW� ff.'S1d ..........
....................................................................................--..... .
..... ...........
Onsite Representative: .............`. ...x. . r............. [.. i{.................................................... Integrator:.................. .. _.
......... ...............
Certified Operator, ................. Co l� � p� � . p
-- - ----------�--.......T.�L(ti_.......-----�------...._........... O erattir Certification Number .........................................
Location of Farm•
Latitude Longitude
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in pl/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other.than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenancelimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
KNo
A A
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
CZ No
❑ Yes
f g No
❑ Yes
C9 No
❑ Yes
AfNo
❑ Yes
9 No
Continued on back

Facility \umber: '�g' --
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
Structures il.a goons Iioldin Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
........................................................................................ ..
Freeboard (ft):
.............T..................................................... .... ...............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
Structure 5
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes U(No
Structure G
0 Yes 56No
❑ Yes fid No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes jg( No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ............ ....... f............. ......:................. ......... � ........ .....................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (A W VIP)? ❑ Yes K No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [TNo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
($ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
Q�Yes
❑ No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
WNo
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
U No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
W No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
K No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
❑ Yes
No
0 No.violations or deficiencies were- noted -during this visit. You.will receive no further
cderespdndence aboutthis.visit:•. . .
omuntents':(refer to;quest5on #} ^Eiplain any,1'ES answers and/or aiiv recommendations ora
Jse drawings:of facility to better ex0lain situations. (use additional pages asnecessary)
=�.<
a,\p A
Aee,) -6- Ace ced4�_4,, a,,v� Lvz4
7/25197
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
h c i :
Date: �+

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
[Division of Water Quality
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DAVQ inspection O Follow -UP of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 2; 3 D 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered kertified © Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 0 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Faun Name: ar-r-a S % 3 County• 0GY`-
vc­cu .............................. ...................................................................
Owner Name: ... ca f nq-1: `....S........F0 ojs Phone No: 2 to " O(o
f................................................... 1
Facility Contact: 4-c........c.. ..... Title:.hj.4/ Jfit............................ Phone No: ......
44.....��..//................ r.......... e c
Mailing Address: ...pt-1 .bfRL f- .�..rr1.... �Q�SQi�.. ��............................. 2 �g
T.. .... .... �....
OnsiteRepresentative.--beQ r.--,4 ,my" Integrator: .... �� 1L...................................................
Certified Operator:............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number;..........
Location of Farm:
.............. _...... ....................................... .................................................... ......................................................................... .................................... ................................... A
..................... ........ ................................... _................... ......................... ................ .-................................................................................. ......... _........... I .... .........................
Latitude ' =' « Longitude =' =1 "
-- .
.g <DestgnCu m 'rrent Current `* Uesegn nrrentsy
YpSwitne :; Capacity Popiilattob „P99. r Capacity Popuiahon $ C-
#11T1
Capacity Popalatiots
[IWean to Feeder ❑Layer : ❑Dairy
Feeder to Finish Dd t` ❑Non Layer ❑ Nan-Dai ry
`-`•. Farrow to Wean ..a.i„ .
El_ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
El
Farrow to Finish "� Total DeStgn Capacity °
. ❑ Gilts
Y, iP Y Pam-
❑ Boars - T6ta1 SSLW-
m
Number of Lagoons / Hold>Etig Ponds ❑ Subsurface D ins resen agoo Spray Field Area -"
t .. P........ _ .._ L n�.
Area
9
° °� '; ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System 3
General
I- Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yeti, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated floe„ in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? Of yes. notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
-RNo
❑ Yes
P(Ne
❑ Yes
kNo
❑ Yes
1W No
❑ Yes
Wo
Continued on back

Facility Number: — 3
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes PNo
Structures fLagoons.11olding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes P(No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): .............13................. ...................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes /f No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes rmNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ONo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes XNo
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes kNo
15.
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering�waters f the State, notify DWQ)
Crop type /< 7e.r�."�`Q..................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes ANo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes KNo
18.
r
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes gNo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 0 No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes dNo
21 _
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes #No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes 9No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes ANo
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes &No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Ms L�kNo.violaitionsi-or deficieneies.werenoted:during' this:visiL You'WiH recei've.no,ftiriher:
ct &6p¢ndence about this'visit.• ' • :: '
/ VQAlo�f !
�Q � r
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Natne
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ' _U_ Date:

Division of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DIVQ inspection O Follow-up of [)S%VC review O Other
Date of Inspection Z -9T
Facility Number D
Time of Inspection i 2 • dD 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered Certified E3 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 0 Not Operational rDate Last Operated:
Farm Name: .... .....' t..�071 Countv:.../�G4Cles�r`..................................................
.............. . ......
Owner Name: ....C.ar.r..�.�1..'............... Foa�5.............._........................ Phone Nw ......ZZ� �O6 ........................
........................
Facility Contact:. L:......... .................. Title:. .. ... �................. Phone No:..✓�.. ......................
.....
Mailing Address:...t`......Fa..................................................... . ...�.Qr4rtl... NC ......................... 2.�..�......`.(.......
�...........................
Onsite Representative ....... !!�.�� ... �lG!.��.................................................. Integrator:......./t7�15.................................... I.............
Certified Operator................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number...........
Location of Farm:
Latitude ' 4 0" Longitude • ' 04C
.Des CuirrenE ` ; 4 Desi Gurietit' " Des Cui-reint
Somme
:Capacity Populatron� Paultr} Capa Ey Pa ulatton � Cattier „Capacity Popiila ion
,
[I Wean toFeeder
❑Dairy
Feeder toFinish
pa „ FEIN%-LayerI I0Non Dairy
Farrow to Wean
x
n. El Farrow
Farrow
❑
to Feeder
ElFarrow Finish
=
to
Total Design Capacity ggj1�
Z❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total'SSLW.
Nuifibr f Lagoons / Holding Ponds ]
❑ Spray Field Area
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
^E
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Snrfacc «rater? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/mi0
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenancelimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25197
❑ Yes [kNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes I't1 No
❑ Yes P�0
❑ Yes A'No
❑ Yes 11KNo
Continued on back

Facility Number:j
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,tioldint* Ponds. Flush fits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure F Structure 2
Identifier: ..._ .. .
Freeboard (ft): .......... .:.............................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 3 Structure 4
I I- Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
H. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes P(No
❑ Yes 0No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WNW, or runoffJJenteringaters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......- ..........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Pernutted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
. . No.violations: or def cient:ies. were ittited during this:visit. Nou twill receive• 6 further
correspondence about this.visit::
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes %No
❑ Yes [P(No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ViNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes O No
❑ Yes 4 No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes JANo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes J" No
❑ Yes Et No
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name ^ ""
tF
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z/ -Q

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Leslie Stutts
7073
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear Leslie Stutts:
if 0 0
�EHN
July 28, 1997
.i1i€ 2 9 1997
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No_ AWS780093
7073
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Robeson County
In accordance with your application received on July 14, 1997, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) to Farm No. 78-93, authorizing the operation of an animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with the State's General Permit (attached). This
approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of
animal waste from the 7073 Farm, located in Robeson County, with an animal capacity of no greater than
8800 Feeder to Finish and the application to a minimum of 71 acres of land as specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2001. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of
wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data
and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater
than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
In accordance with General Statue 143-215.1OC, Animal Waste Management Plans shall include
the following components: - -
- A checklist of odor sources and best management practices to minimize these sources.
- A checklist of insect sources and best management practices to minimize these sources_
- Provisions set forth for acceptable methods of disposing of mortalities.
Provisions regarding emergency action plans.
Your existing Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must include the above elements, by
December 31, 1998. Documentation of the certification must be available to inspectors onsite. Submittal
of the amended certification statement shall be required upon renewal of your permit coverage in 2001.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely, �, 7
-IL-A- Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Robeson County Health Department
Fayetteville -Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Robeson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 11, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Carroll's Foods Inc
7073
PO Drawer 85b
Warsaw NC 28398
Farm Number: 78-93
Dear Carroll's Foods Inc :
IN I! MAI
IT 40 0
A&4�1
�EHNR
RECE9VEp
9 1997
FAYETTEVILLE
REG. ., .�� � CE
You are hereby notified that 7073, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, yourfarm has th'
days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with
Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date.
Your application must be returned within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the
application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for
each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package. The
signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location map, and
two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the application
package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any question concerning this letter, please call John Jallah at [phone] extension
364 or Ed Buchan with the Fayetteville Regional Office at [phone]
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
FayettevW"agional Offce wlow�►a ' .. _ `� ___, -
F.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 109/6 post -consumer paper