780092_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

S
Ant . r
JAMES B. HUNT
l' GOVERNOR
1i
-i '_�'• w •`yam
f� Wit• a �. •-.i.��•'�-` � .•
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 11, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUEST -ED
Mr. Dan Lewis
2087 Bethesda Church Rd.
Orrum, NC 28369
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2H.0217
DHL/Page Farm
Permit No. AWS780092
Robeson County
Dear Mr. Lewis:
You are hereby notified that, having been Permitted to have a non
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A
NCAC 214 .0217, you have been found to be in violation of your 2H.0217
Permit.
On March 29, 1999, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quality, during a routine fly over, observed run off ofanimal
waste from your farm located in Robeson County. The subsequent investigation
revealed that waste had been applied in such a manner that the waste ran off the
application field and entered an adjacent low lying area. This run o$ is viewed as a
violation of the general permit and your CAWW.
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 283 0 1-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATiVE ACTION EMPLOYER -!!0% RECYCLED/10% pO;T-CONSUMER PAPER
RIT

DHL/Page Farm
5-11-99
Page 2
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following item(s) be addressed:
1. Modify the rate of application and implement measures to prevent future run off.
2. Follow your CAWMP.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing it's Permitted status
and being required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the Division of Water
Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $10,000.00 per day per violation.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either myself or
Mr. John Hasty, Environmental Specialist, at [phone].
Sincerely,
%V, —
Paul E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Sonya Avant - Compliance Group
Ed Holland - Robeson Co. NRCS
Audrey Oxendine - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files - Raleigh
Terry Jones -Carroll's Foods-Laurinburg Office

W *"
'=0 Divrs><on ofSoil and Water Conservation -_Operation Revrew �_ [[
El.Drv[sion of Soil Arid Water`Coriseevation - Coiitiplianr a Inspection
_ zDcylsion of Water Quality Coinpli once Inspections
- _ -
[] Other Agency OperahonyReview=
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow -tie of DWQ ins ection 0 Follow -tip of DS«'C review 0 Other
Facility Number L Bate of Inspec:lionZ-
I•imc of laspection 'ff 124 hr. (hh:mm)
(*Permittcd ©}Certified 0 Con i�tioonnaally Certified ❑ Registered © Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .. aK E'ull.S.... 1/(T`.... .�k e ................................. County:.... Ci S Y . .......................
q Q
Owner Nante:.... ....L.�' .l..S:......................................... Phone No:.........
L.
ZS / 1....................1..................
FacilityContact: _........ (0 ...................................... Title: ..................-�.........�................................ ..P..hone No: ......�...........�.......�...
.Z..--�-1---3-...0....p.1.............
& ............................<ailing Address: ..... .C4./h................... .
j
Onsite Representative: ��n 'P4� .... Integrator: ....................qr'ro(I1s...................................
................ ........ ..................`..........
Certified Operator: ....... DCk,.t�......................... ... L C' I.'A............ ... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
........ ..................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 • C " Longitude 0 • ° «.
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder- to Finish _] ZD
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
ID -Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity ZQ
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons FO -Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste LManagement System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. Ii' discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Sur€ace Waters []Waters of the State
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated liow in tiallinin"
I d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon stistcm?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storaue capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: /1
Freeboard (inches): 2.,&
n .......................................................................................................
❑ Yes '0 No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes NNo
❑ Yes ,� No
❑ Yes j No
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
1/6/99 Continued on back
s

23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ONo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes j�No
EI. N D'vlalatlot s' -o' . deticiencie's.were noted. d'urin'g .this.visit.' Y.ou wi1frei r.Ave no further .: .
.. eofresp6tndeh(ce; iibotit' this � isit. ...... ; • ; - : - : - : . ; • ; .. ; .. .......................................................... ]
Comments-(i-efer to question #):` Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other
[lse drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary) ' 3=
i
IUeed s�p�r e �7erM o- rye OffItCXZ401A_s :Iti.
Tw•S rc��ec+tr�c�e��cce. �J
1 rod"C e r' D Ue r 0. t
�'z Z � di, t? 7/ � AW SFfI ara.�;ri q �e r)s� � cL �d- r r E C �� � YP1"et� 5-07KC
J f
I
r--
SLc-�c i�►.�#" TZS /cee t".ur� wiTk �r c4�oy-S . /���� � SA o .� eE
Reviewer/Inspector Name s
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ��. Date: 3 _%Z
1/6/99
7Facility
Number: % — 9Z Date of Inspection
S.
Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
V
❑Yes
j�J No
seepage, etc-)
6.
Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
4NO
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7,
Do any of the structures need maintenance/intprovement?
❑ YesfNo
o
8.
Does any pail of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
9-
Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
10,
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
�j No
I L
Is there evidence of over application? El Ponding ❑ Nitrooen
El Yes
N0
12.
Crop type ............ . 't'` '131 ..Q -.......4.1e.....................-..-
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
9No
14.
Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint)
❑ Yes
ONo
15-
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
9No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
4No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
j No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
ONo
19.
Does record keeping need improvement'? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
aftes
VfNo
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
A No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
[:]Yes
V(No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
(Yes
❑ No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ONo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes j�No
EI. N D'vlalatlot s' -o' . deticiencie's.were noted. d'urin'g .this.visit.' Y.ou wi1frei r.Ave no further .: .
.. eofresp6tndeh(ce; iibotit' this � isit. ...... ; • ; - : - : - : . ; • ; .. ; .. .......................................................... ]
Comments-(i-efer to question #):` Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other
[lse drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary) ' 3=
i
IUeed s�p�r e �7erM o- rye OffItCXZ401A_s :Iti.
Tw•S rc��ec+tr�c�e��cce. �J
1 rod"C e r' D Ue r 0. t
�'z Z � di, t? 7/ � AW SFfI ara.�;ri q �e r)s� � cL �d- r r E C �� � YP1"et� 5-07KC
J f
I
r--
SLc-�c i�►.�#" TZS /cee t".ur� wiTk �r c4�oy-S . /���� � SA o .� eE
Reviewer/Inspector Name s
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ��. Date: 3 _%Z
1/6/99

fit!
�i5:.�.aS:Lr„L' 2,:erpwat
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 1, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
TURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
DHL Farm -
Facility No. 78-92
Robeson County
Dear Mr. Lewis:
On March 12, 1999, staff from the Fayettteville Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quality conducted an inspection of the DHL Farm in Rbeson
County. The inspection revealed that overapplication had occured on the winter
overseed at this facility. It was also noted that a current waste analysis had not been
obtained 60 days prior to or 60 days after an irrigation event.
3n regard to the deficiency(s) noted during the inspection , the following
actions are requested:
1. Take waste samples in accordance with the laws of this State.
2. Make sure that the overapplication of nitrogen is avoided in the future.
Please provide a written response to this office on or before April 19, 1999 as
to the actions taken or proposed to be taken to resolve this deficiency. Nothing in this
letter should be taken as absolving this facility of the responsibility and liability of any
violations that have resulted or may result from this deficiency.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please contact John Hasty at
[phone].
Sin ly,
ohn C. Hasty, Jr.
Environmental Specialist
cc: Sonya Avant -Compliance Group
Audrey Oxendine-DSWC Fayetteville Office
Ed Holland -Robeson Co. NRCS
Central Files -Raleigh
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 2a301 -5o43
PHONE 910-486-t 541 FAX 910-496-o7o7
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- SO% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

r�
f
• j5� Q I]rvrsion of Soil and Water Conseri ahon Operation
` Q Dins�on of Buil and Water :Conservation - Conzphance Inspection
Ef Divisi6n of Water Quality 42_COmpliancexlnSpectiOn r i z y' 4 cfi r
Orr
Other;Agency ,: Operation Review _ :',���
IQ Routine Q Complaint Q Follow -tip of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other �
Facilit}'Number '] Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Apermitted Q Certified Q Conditionally Certified Q Registered JE3 Not OperationaU OperationalDate Last Operated:
11 r D
Farm Name:1.� L� C'�3 r 5 �` [2 r County :......... ..... Q�.......................................
.>'5..........� ..._. -- — - -- ......M........ .................... ...
Owner Name: _.... �.+� Leto; 5 Phone No: �P2��.{1~�.��............ I ........... I............
Facility Contact:p W.) ► $y"' Title: Phone No: Z77=7:7=
•---•.-.�................................. .....-----�--..ice.............................- ••-•-------q-----
1L7ailins Address:...... G �. .. �li S q � D.r .. 1 `� C �..... ....
Onsite Representative:Integrator:
............ .......�...._................---•..........-............................ .......... ....CaJCYD4........... ......._.........
Certified Operator:.....W a:k....... ....L...... ... Operator Certification Number:..-•--_
Location of Farm:
Latitude ' < « Longitude 0• A
swine Uapacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Weeder to Finish z
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Trent
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
Layer ❑ Dairy
Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons f ❑ Subsurface Drains Present L7 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
DischaMes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other -
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State ❑ Yes 4N
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? ❑ Yes 1PNo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes J�No
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes1110
Waste Collection R Treatment /�
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [t(No
Structure I Structure 2 -Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches) ........ D
116199 Continued on back

Facility Number: — 7$` Date of Inspection ,�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes [gNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes 9 N
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any pair of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes gNo
Waste Application j
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? El Ponding ❑Nitro/gen 1 ❑ Yes No
12. Crop type .............................I C / 131.'a.....f.:! 5i.........1 ct1.......... ef:w.......................................................................... .............
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? El Yes g'No
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint) ❑ Yes - \\,0
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
Re uired Records & Documents
17_ Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) Oyes Wo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)ffl�les %No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes J No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
-No.XWn'tions:or. deficiencies .were vatted d&ink Ais.visit:. Yriu Mfri�eive no further
egrrespaideike abotif this visit • . : • : • :: :
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any oilier comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):.'.,
iVPed �O e4— Cu V_ re'� WaS a
I iA �r` C�7 a.dui fE4 �c� l..t IUILJ le lecG Oooe rc p
1'�07L ' 1 n / / / L l
41'M 5oMe over czO�ca
a'ta[ 5�5. T "t4vel 41en.4r en- Lsat�T�n� w,,,4 Xt-ryt" /qra L-41 ea a.•.et4,
000j"14000j"14T {tEtPrY000j"14;S Oft �Gaiid'� — n- -/V` ..7D 1k, OA—
I
�� mje Ion fP.l�Sf ',IViS 1S AJ Ouer,664 i5 lohe4 15 aCt•'O , —
A
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ff Date: �,Li` 4 1/6/9S

�E [� Division of Soil.and'WiiCf Conservation =Operation<Revrew r g =Y "
1
-- DNision of Soil and•Wi&'i,'Conservation - Compliance Inspection � -
? Y f Y -'
Dtvrs�on of Water QualityCompliance inspection : s is
w ionR_evrew`'Q Oth
gency
O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
l'inie oi' Inspection i a 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered JE3 Not O crational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:...--Q11,.��c�f.t.s..�l....11..�SJ County:..... .................... ......................
OwnerName:.0 .............................. .................... i.5...............-.....-..............--........ Phone thio:.......fPZ .'...............................................
Facility Contact: .•..•.•( c?JYI„�° ................................ ............. Title: Phone No:
_ IlIl
.............................. ......................................
Mailing Address: 2 ��7.....I�.e .tP.3 rt .....�-i h:..... ... .... ............. -,.^'L.. 1.4 . ......................... $7 .'.....
Onsite Representative: Integrator: , ��T r o (. S
Certified Operator: V. __. L e Lw
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
........................................................................:..................................................................................................................................•.............................................................
Latitude ' 4 :4 Longitude 0 ° ”
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
NJ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity `7 gZp
❑Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discbarzes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (11'yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon (Spray Field [I Other
a. 11 -discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made:'
h- li•discharge is observed. did it reach: El Surface Waters E] Waters of the State
c. I1• dis hat -Le is observed. what is the estimated flow in (,al/rnin?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
it
Freeboard(inches): _........ ...7.............. ........... -....................... ................................... ...... -............................. ...
Structure 5
Yes ❑ No
❑
Yes' No
❑
Yes No
v..--
❑ Yess ANo
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes 4 No
Structure 6
1/6/99 Continued on hack

T r
LFacility Nu Date of Inspection ,1 p
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste mana(rement or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management systern other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? El Yes [:]No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
eorresporideikce: gbout: this Visit:-' ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; :: :: ; ; : ; ; :: ; : :
liquid level elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste application
A.
r1 f�
.S`T�j aQ�YDJCi+1+4��0� 2:30ro,, tAf&11- 4rriJct�l0.+ aff000C. �i�aQl�a prr- �Z`i 1 fur- Was 51' d
I
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11.
Is there evidence of over application'? Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
(d Yes
❑ No
12.
J
Crop type ........r�rl vvt.�i Q� a.. GtCc�..........e.......................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
ReviewerlInspector Name
13.
Do the receiving, crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14.
• Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint)
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Reauired
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
-,
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to n6tify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑'Yes
❑ No
0. N,o.violations.ar. deficiencies .were no'te'd during .Niis:visit:. You wiil.receive oar further . ;
eorresporideikce: gbout: this Visit:-' ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; :: :: ; ; : ; ; :: ; : :
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any.recommendations or any other
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
E1n%% 3-Z9 99I w�irle Canti♦,t y.q G rac f„�_4' V _o�rer G� ��esv►� l,'o. rwn-a t uc>s a%se�y_
�y ej
A.
r1 f�
.S`T�j aQ�YDJCi+1+4��0� 2:30ro,, tAf&11- 4rriJct�l0.+ aff000C. �i�aQl�a prr- �Z`i 1 fur- Was 51' d
I
aT +j e �'" v i , m me�x�-e 17 � a of � P �r u c� �oaci D-� SO i I
�ec�iuejY bladed oiisc�a.�� .�i•o„` eti�+n�-�e�..Sf�Ivs wP� eo(!�d la.�-{ as 4 a,as
q�d
J AG �Ltr� q �it.:t.rolfK f n ueS eC*x- Coi{Ic� 1++f p,4;r�t.4, n g1 M r• L ewes ci4 g.30 _
uL
_ f �t�c
1
G�t'*�r^li.r7 Z its /lws c�r�' a bPIt-►+c s:k y�t�fL�
!� AaT w ¢�C'r5 0� r tie s��tE. Sri w.P IL�s ro dorort5-�C�ar� i�+
ReviewerlInspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
V
116/99

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
817 Castle Hayne Street Fayetteville. NC 28303 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PAGE OF
RallSlQMOueI
Geta
me
R� W.Isignatum
3 -3o-
36D
-r>�.�,� 2/3:
74 -D
&,L1
gWOW by jftnatutet
Data
Time
Received Dy: Iftnaturef
Dad
Time
3
CODE: A a -WC ONLY
4
Relinquished W. (signatulel
�mm.�mml���l��loom
Time
Recamed W. ISignatum)
Date
Time
5
6
Relinquished by: (Signaturel
Date
Time
RaeaivW by:131gnatum)
nate
Time
7
8
amp,
�■i�uo��nn��a
RallSlQMOueI
Geta
me
R� W.Isignatum
3 -3o-
36D
-r>�.�,� 2/3:
74 -D
&,L1
gWOW by jftnatutet
Data
Time
Received Dy: Iftnaturef
Dad
Time
3
4
Relinquished W. (signatulel
Daft
Time
Recamed W. ISignatum)
Date
Time
5
6
Relinquished by: (Signaturel
Date
Time
RaeaivW by:131gnatum)
nate
Time
7
8
Comments or Special Hazards:

FAYETIEVILLE DIVISION
817 Castle Hayne Street Fayetteville, AIC 28303 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PAGE _` OF
Irrqul b;r gna11,
Dm
Time
lir (Sig rrO
Date
Time
Time
(/ ,
3--
/300
3 - �o
u amd by; (Signature) i
Date
Time
Recoved. (Signature)
Date
Time
3
CODE: A a -WC ONLY
4
�mOol�l��lllloom�,
Inqutshed try: (Signature)
Date
Time
Racwved W, (Signature)
Date
Time
5
B
inquished try'. 15ignaturei
Date
Time
Received by: (Signature)
Date
Time
7
8
Irrqul b;r gna11,
Dm
Time
lir (Sig rrO
Date
Time
Time
(/ ,
3--
/300
3 - �o
u amd by; (Signature) i
Date
Time
Recoved. (Signature)
Date
Time
3
4
Inqutshed try: (Signature)
Date
Time
Racwved W, (Signature)
Date
Time
5
B
inquished try'. 15ignaturei
Date
Time
Received by: (Signature)
Date
Time
7
8
Comments or Special Hazards:

W
N
.a
T
N
J

A R—-99 MON 09 :.17 AM IlAN LEWIS FARMS 910 628 9128 P-02
Beim Lewis Farms, Inc.
2087 Udhcsda Churdi Road
OrYum. NIC 28369
1'isa�e 410-bZ&9097
Faz 91028-412$
trait bgl�anolinena
April 18, 1999
North Carolina Department of
Enviromnent and Natural Resources
225 Green Street -Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 29301-5043
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
On March 12, 1999, the DHL -page hog farm was inspected and found that I had not taken a logoon water sample
in the required dune of my fall paunping on over -seeded wheat. Due to using the samples prior to this irrigation
cycle, caused the nitrogen rate to be higher than normal and resulted in over application.
Since this inspection, I have taken samples, and 1%411 tontine to do so on sixty-day intervals.
ly
DAN LEWIS
DHL: mbl

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
817 CASTLE HAYNE STREET
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28303
[phone] / [phone] (FAX)
AIR • FUEL • WATER • FOOD •
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CLIENT: NC DEHNR
ADDRESS: Wachovia Building, Suite 114
Fayetteville, NC 28301
CONTACT PERSON: Mr. Jeffery Brawn
ACCOUNT NUMBER: #KN003
SAMPLE ID: 1. Discharge - ID #99WE32196
2. 200 yds down - ID #99WD32197
3. Swamp - ID #99WE32198
4.
NC #11
NC #37714
USDA #3787
WASTES
CERT #26163
DATE RECD: 03/30/99 SAMPLED: 03/29/99
SAMPLED BY: J. Hasty
DELIVERED BY: J- Hasty
SAMPLE CODE: Waste water, Grab
REFERENCE: Robeson County - Page Farm
DATA REVIEWED BY: 4 ��
DATE REPORTED: 04/06/99
ANALYSIS 2"' 3 4
COLIFORM, FECAL (per 100 ml) SM18 9222D •5000 *1727 *1727
CSS: * = Out of holding time; client requested running
< = Less than
> = Greater than
R E� C E At E, - D'�
APR 8 1999
FAYETTEVILLE
REG. OFFICE
PAGE 1 OF 1
The data and other inlomiaion corrtalned on Ws, and other axompanyhV cl=ments, represent only the =T09(s) anatyzed and is IPA E M B E R
rendered upon the oondition that k is not to be reproduced whoDy or in part for advenWnp or other purposes without written approvel
from the laboratory.
USDA -EPA -NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Miaobloiogical Analyses and Research

A
I
Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
FAYETTEVILL:E DIVISION NC All
817 CASTLE RAYNE STREET NC 037714
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 2$.3003 USDA #3787
1910) 864-1920 / (910) 864-877. (FAX)
AIR • FUEL - WATER • FOOD • WASTES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CLTENT: NC DEHUR
ADDRESS: Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, N'G 28301
CONTACT PERSON: Mr. Jetfery Brawn
ACCOUNT NUMBER: `#1GT003.=- ._' : : ; - r. _ ._ w
SAMPLE ID: 1. Discharge - 1D #99WE32196
2. 200 yds dr -44n - ID #99WD32197
3. Swamp - ID #99WE32198
4.
CERT #26163
DATES REC'D: 03/30/99 SAMPLED: Ot /29/99
SAMPLED BY: J. Hasty
DELIVERED BY: J. Hasty
SAMPLE CODE: Waste water, Grab
REFERENCE: ia}i.esoif`Coutl.t y-'-- Page Farm
4
DATA REVIEWED BY:
DATE REPORTED: 04/06!99
4 :f: f++L+i trk ';fk114 i+}++k-j, 4+i 44-7r iY+L*fLepi +s}d.i 4, 44,+ r}i i:'1 -L{,:4 4s1;k4+1 i+: f,l: i,
4
ANALYSIS METKOD .1 2 3 4
+{+#}}+i+#+i+#-f*f#*!ri*iri+{#
$701-TFORM, F RCAT. (par 100 ml j SMI H 9a? -'D *5001) *17?7 *1727
COMMENTS: '* Out Ot 'noSainq time; ciie'nt'r-e4;ested r it. ting_
< = Less than F
> = Greater than
RECEIVE
APR 8 1999 "
FAYETTEVILLE
.REG. OFFICE
PAGE 1 OF 1
The data and other Intormmiaa mntedned on tds, and other accompanying documents, represent ordy the sample(s) analyzed and Is M E M B E R
rendered upon the condition that it is not to the reproduced wholly or In part for advertsing or other purposes without written approval
from the laboratory. -
USDA -EPA -NIOSH Tasting Food Sant Son Cansutting Chemical and Micmbiological Analyses and Research

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
817 CASTLE RAYNE STREET
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28303
[phone] / [phone] (FAX)
AIR FUEL WATER FOOD •
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
NC #11
NC #37714
USDA #3787
WASTES
CERT #26164
CLIENT:
NC DEHNR
DATE RECD:
03/30/99 SAMPLED: 03/30/99
ADDRESS:
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
SAMPLED BY:
J. Hasty
Fayetteville, NC 28301
DELIVERED BY: J. Hasty
CONTACT
PERSON: Hr. Jeffery Brown
SAMPLE CODE: Waste water, Grab
ACCOUNT
NUMBER: #KN003
REFERENCE:
Robeson,County - Page Farm
SAMPLE
ID: 1_ Dawn @ Hwy 41 - ID #99WD32199
2. 200 yds down - ID #99WD32200
3. Down drainage at farm - ID #99WD32201
4.
DATA REVIEWED BY:
DATE REPORTED: 04/06/99
+++++++++++++++++++++++++*+++++++++++++t++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ANALYSIS 4EOD 1 2 3 4
COLIFORM, FECAL (per 100 ml) SM18 9222D 36 460 99
ccbfia T8: < = Less than
> = Greater than
PAGE 1 OF 1
RECEIVED
APR 8 1999 '.
REG p�j�
The dale and other Information oontelned on this, and other aorompanying documeras, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and Is M E M B E R
rendered upon the oorailtion that it is not to be reproduced wholly or in pert for advertising at other purposes without written approval
from the tabdrafory.
USDA -EPA -NIOSH Testing Food Sanbtbn Consulting Cherniaal and Mkmbiologiral Analyses and Research

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
FAYETTV-11LLE DI`IIS1014 AIC #11.
817 CASTLE IMY'NE STREET NC #37714
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28,303 USDA #x3787
[phone] / (910) 6664-8774 (FAK)
AIR • FUEL WATER • FOOD • WASTES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CERT #26164
r,'LTBNT*
STC DERNR
DATE RRSC'D:
03/30/99 SAMPLED: 03/30/99
ADDRESS:
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
SAMPLED BY:
J. Ha.9ty
Fayetteville, NC 28301
DELIVERED BY:
J. Hasty
CClNTACT
PERSON; Mr. 01 -f tery Brown
SAMPLE l 0DE:
Waste water, Grab\
T1CCO?UNT
N1ffSER: jrlhiYOj)3* .' m r t
+` � Z� FiN4.E:
RO e'STC�1Y`Cl7Eiili.`� – FagH FdLIIl
S.A.14PLE ID: 1. Dovm @ Ilwy 41 - ID #99WD3.2199
2. 200 vds down - ID #99WD32200
3. Dcvm drainage at farm -- ID #99WD32201
4
DATA REVIEWED BY:
FIATS REPORTED: 04/06i99
4.4 46.-1,+Li-�++kA-14 4+4 i --L i**3,x4,4+-i4-�L44i 4.***1.3*+41.1. 4 til+*3*4-+k1, i, 4riA -4— 4;6++a+}+4, 4� 441
ANALYSIS METHOD. 1 2 3 4
+k+++*+ +++++d.i+++++fir+++*+*+}.+fir++ +++++++*+*++fir*+4 .L#i+**++}+.F
COLIFORM, FECAL (per 100, ml) SI418 9222D 36 460 99
co&, �S : . _ I. ss than-
}
> = Greater than
FtECEN'ED
pPR a 1999
REG,.OFF1C
PAGE 1 OF 1
. v
The data and other hlto nudion contained on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the samples) analyzed and 1s M E M B E R
rendered upon the condition that it is nut to be reproduced wholly or In part for advertising or other purposes wilhoul written approval
from the laboraloq.
USDA -EPA -NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research

ti�'�0 0
Fr W.
, q. °6 r �4'�r'�+ (d 1 5 ' 9y� 1',• p •1 ° O;- W
o }
Ab
-.�r. / r • - N 1
-mow k, 5 (,.l.I'1.•-. fil .r ,- c ooe ° ii {+Y •�' y /
"4- #. # - :# p # ' `zr.. r --�: z •`. q f
10
�_ # .ar- eI _ 111 I� �- zt-c I,S.�i.,•�S'' ar`
J#
Branc r� " •r I,; `:r'''.�,. "� s
q;
• 'F ,�y,.r �.a`. - .{ly- _- `- �I►• r 9 h � r! \�= 11. it iI i' 1�
A �'J •.:
• ■ ter-
-4rr r
- •f. - ter- -'W`- ' O fo o• 106 \ . 'd
9
06 -dip
AW-
on
/Q ! 4g ' ` < 9 0 C,. - -# ` is
n F::
s H h \ ♦ y.,. 'r► moo- 4 -dr- 4 - // 7 '+ n • u . ,
_r.7
l' 1 Alz
....FlUIR CCT� r \ r � .•� �l- - ..a. . H
l(}�\ /09A,..•
\ i r / J u r-.w�- - r' aU a }. \ �► 'w- �# ,y► - �' , , �
1p 41 q 1�,- \ai.
�+— �:� . 's,,, 7� .• `e � o fir. � _ � � � .,\ � GH a�,: .� , ` � '\��r
-;- � qy d •r ^max./ - _ ° ° I. � � .t M
;� � fes# �F-y •` •r s=r �� � m'°$�1/ 1 pso •. I �'rr� .... 4 o ' RO e, .
•- -r- - '� i7 `�' h. 151 ] N -'M• -'qr -w- '. �• "h '• 4! 4 n`'wtl
�- _'�- fir- .�- � ` sr. fie"' .ar r11 \ �- _.\ . t+i � �-":,e�- w ter- .,r rt- ''V„'} • f O i
�' .��,# �-� �. • k •�° . � aF yti' ti�•rw _ N 'yam-�"'- .+rte ..r � � '�'- �}.,r, � i� } •�J1M-//•�1 °{p� .r....
+.w- � �.� ter►-- l � a ix•; o . "r' If WB9.0 Asa �y , _.yam - �►•- -,r - r - _ -w- •r i � At's� �„� 1 \ J .;-J s
1i .r ... K S 9� N ► # _ .r s �1 ° N
' - +- -••- - ~ y5 9M ' '�� � �' J "'-.+rr--,w -+w �-•�'- - mow- "� �: _" q\ n
.rr. --'�►- r� % � J~ '.� 9 + '.t.tir •'•r 1- # '-w"�..- -err'. _. 'W, -,Y� '�ru.- �..w �" .. Ip
r�� -9 ';1 q'q „�..�--i "�'" .ne.-•r. 'r' "w' .yr �.- _ mow- �+-_ - -� � 4
-� ,(g��'lyy�,��''� F� / a 9 K � � � » yam- .,w-�►. � ,,,rte - ._ - � Jr. - ..r.- .,r ��" � O
'00 fI `\` - o. / _ �,y, - -w •r #--r- #.r - -w. -+.. �\ 0 \
�0' pr ;l Lewis' \� II AI �� f r -' - - •` -p r r
1' . I • ' �• 7 @v t i ,,Ce it �/ • p II, -46,-}''� ' • _ '� - •.s• -'"� ---gar- "'u" -► _
1 - �-- �r '�•` - #- +k - # ..�,. - -ate ''Y' 'w
� r °• °� rN Sd �` 90 HI•f .Jf+ Ii•; /� - �r -w= •yr ,�y, r- - �• ,yw -rr .ar► -.w
111/1° h r - ° 05 0 pO /��y� • .'►.- T'_ -,_- ,r- - - .
105-• / W } iii"'""" .,,,. ,7 - l• I£ e� ir• ri -.aP. .� # _. _�`• 4 -+- -
j JJjj ° r y N1 3109 ° "'•+..: ' { r L¢ Hl� JI} - �� Jl �r � + .+n
r,i a e=$Cem II + •.a.- �- �" -
'�- _ iri�., �'�� + � �A► ripO �`•:�.: waw r• .�•

�j.�.yy ^ • r Y *R�1f/ :ate 21
F.S/c :;_g' 3fi -J an L �. J �.d^ ft .,t * �'--,�►-• .•� .► _ ..ir '' U77t
• f``� ��35 �3.J �,i.4;�• •fiir:: s rr � � %ir.�^r" �. �r -�. -w- 1 "s� ° � ?16
F r 1 .1 � cK. S.: 8�'�o ifrti ,"S � aS. _ _ a"' .'-�-+• � ,;x.17' HiSJ. \ _ Ull o
-1.:^,'a x �, S •ae a� ~-�r_ _-Mr yy� �La1� `•127�CaM� S:;•. a�{,F ,-
�� . .f i '� � - '+:111 � ! 3� �y" F•• \ c • � - ��w• � {.' l
FS
.., i � �� �.°� .Y•' 9,r ' M r... • rte• - °� tc '\
��!'4 0 0 °' d• • � a e h 8 r �. \ . ter- �"' - -'+•-. -.r.• �: }} _ J �.. _
'V r79 0° 0,� °�$'4 • •� as ` �. Yr �►- ^wry �Y`-. � � � �- � b-_ i ` •.
' � • a 4 s � . ` _,�. Tom- _ •� - _�. =°�'+�
?x -
'y• see a '�, 00 -� �a o \
'i r - � �`%' .-_ -. •+�"` -���. (\�\��/_J 735 1 ��7 •\ I
1�,. rr':�i•,- fi � $�,4 / .._".�.. •,.• -y.• .w � s ° ;CV�'Yl � n `�. ii
r c f •- f i. � o ° o - •.r. � - C .. °
° °' a �`• - ..r.• �` .. .,."`- ,moo `, r1- R'7 a
Y 7 'n-� �I►',yY. `•'4� W -•Y•- yy„�-„r• ✓\4' �' 'G 'r•-3� r _ ,
Rs ` ; j{ �a c �,I • � �•+4•il► 4Yr �. Yt'.... 5., a Jew 1 r
C ° R
,.
° _ y!' "� -�.-� 11►• -+r - �.�. � - � L Hg t •A 1 `it 1' ' 'i '�`�.+r -r
Aw-
f? I _• -.►• -' mow• fir- r•- . I 7 4 . TQ !h, TJ iP ;.r-_'� _ �•r
••, �„ - -� - iy"`,.V1; "" - �`• _ - .,►tea' `�• w• •+' .+,r
Newr,'s
. � ' 4 °/ '�' � wYr ,ny.. �-' .ter- � �� a• ! C �r �.:;; , - N
i - �In•.... -�- -�- �►_ +ilr- K 97:- -"`. r ' �� a aur -*•
41
Ab,
• , �' 11, ' r: , .. "Y.T.-W :�Wr '"F"�W. r +Mr_ +Ir- '•Ire r"'� ? r� R� o ' '�` _ Wr-w��_1'il►' _' +,�-
46.
N , ra -rw- '�►• _ '"`' -rt• `
!p ..-ay ..W,.- ,,w- .,�.• - -W_" \-//,-�!�" 8e Seti UB .� `'\ �►' ""•- - '- La Cem"
� ul.. Y r�u. � �Y.._ - .yr - f I� /�\ 1 em •:, �,. i ,,,. �' . ecce 2 ♦ � -�, -•y►: � -Wr ° .
--do- .46
r:_4� . !_ k.� f� � r� � ter• 1r- _ �JQ Z�r�� 1- 1 °� I`i/ \ �,c' T .y -r.- y' � -i-�y` �Y "`_«'•.S o
ji
IQ
ob
1p p ,-:r t ! d ' '� •�I►• 'yam_ i! - \ / r- T _ ° n
4 v i4l
�r- yr-_ _ V, BISMH o ter- .•Yr- _" wr- l\
� .i ..yw yy.. — �•^ l '•k .. �.•. • -ice ,M.. •Yr ,+' �,�.. ,.
i o?a�r � � {1 p I� �a. �^f" ""` - -iwT •:.uw _', <,- ° •- •w -r .W. ti. - � � j - m

Banmintiv
For Sows
a 1 c At
S FLEXIBILITY CAN
PAY OFF FOR YOU.
02
rte.
V
4-7
J
tll
S FLEXIBILITY CAN
PAY OFF FOR YOU.

T
1�

's _�
a^ ..:s