780059_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quaff

of Visit A0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit —(F Routine O Complaint. O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other I ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date or visit: Time: ' f7
Not aerational Q Below Threshold
13 Permitted 13 Certified. © Conditio y Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: �Q.. ii'�Ll,........ County: _...... 512'�,...� .. _ . .
�[ 7 q
Owner Name: ..... .��..1SttrSrC'lf�i.�............ Jl.... Phone No:.........�f.. $ ...9ff�7..... ....
FacilityContact: {/ti..?k1........... Titles ................... ............:.. ........... Phone No:
Mailing Address: 1,T z_.. y...�� ....�7. 1...... �JU.�/t �' .. !`!•• .....
I _..
Onsite Representative: C�,�_k^ Int e g rator•
Certified Operator:.....(...... ....... .... Operator Certification Number: �j ........ ire•................�.__._�.._..._._.
Location of Farts: J
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • r_�6 46 Longitude • �u
-` Desiga.. Current Design Current - Dest®o'- Cgrreto�t
Swtne .-: Ca act .
NPIlateon=:. Poutltry -, ; Ca ci Pb"=tilatioio .. Catde _
Ca act ` --Po` atiots
Wean to Feeder
: ❑Layer _ ❑Dairy
Feeder to Finish
❑Non -Layer ' : ❑ Non -Dairy
o
Farrw o Wean
t
::.. _ _
.,
Farrow to Feeder Q
Other
;
Farrow to Finish
TOW.Cs
�� tY
�
Gilts
Boars
Total SSLW-
rNWW)C�,pl �a$ DOns
Subsurface Drains Present n Area
❑ S I oQ
Field Area
❑Spray F
-._ HoldsngPonds-/ Solid Trays;-:'
- - No Liquid Waste Management System n:
Discharges & Stream ImpaCtS
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ YesT0
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes o
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes AdNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier.........................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
5/00 Continued on back

Facility Number: —
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection �O
4. as storage caps lus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and: the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7_ Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessi a PondinglI,� —❑ PAN El Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type �C'r'h A J4 e ��D�d
13. Do the receiving crops di7`with those designatadin the Ceo fled Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
17. Are rock outcrops present?
18. Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary?
❑ On-site ❑ Off-site
Structure 6
❑ Yes A"10
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ Yes
g No
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ Yes
X No
❑ Yes
V No
Rectuired Records && Documents
19.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
gNo
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
P(No
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
El Yes
X.``No
22.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
KNO
23.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
24.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
No
25.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
[)(No
26.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ONO
27.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
Wo
Odor issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
E]Yes
kNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
W<o
01/01/01
Continued

'i
Facility Number:. — Date of Inspection
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i_c. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31- Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc-)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Printed on: 1/4/2001
❑ Yesto
o
El Yes
❑ Yes
❑ YesZ;Oo
❑ Yes ❑No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Ca>rnents refer to. uest�iinEx lain an�=YFSans�ve and/or aecoiiimendat ons i' an other cammeats'=-4—- - -
llse drawings of facEhty tv better explain srtnat�ons (use addittonal pages as necessary) `rk _ ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes �-
74 -n -4f are an/y awG4 2�o si�e ccf -fkiv �,%Ke,
Are re 14� oP f 4 be rem o u Lid -�rra- a L. -r
y
f
Zrric ian r-%zcdrd5 wet -e aec-, W i,%- 2_6dO cp--. -d were i W-40rder
/Vvw®uer� recdrdS ►lave beery M 15f `geed C -Ad Aa it r -r t
kctS been Pe4armeJ Jf;nCe 2.606 -�- 5
W � �e.. Cra� . � � ewe qre_
Me
Reviewer/Inspector Name r�:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
iI
01/01/01
F

w. .
_'.
-_ DIVLSEOn Of Watet try Sr { 1 t
= Division Of Soil COnservatlon ----!1 � a i _ �f
0 O_ ihet Agency .
f
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Q'Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: F7--T--Oz—1 Time: 1 7" dz) I Printed on: 10/26/2000
U Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: ..... ��... ....... .rlL........
........�r(!1...... ....... County:.......,Q��P�4?�ti..r�............
.... `. ..
Owner Name:.... �Gi .............. /'r Phone No:...(?Z�1721.. ............................................................
Facility Contact: .................. E rl: ................................. Title: ...... Phone No:
�j �-/....................................................,
Mailing Address: ........ zlF�'Gy�i'�..L..� QS�.� IC:..........L�,1�.t.w...........
...
�- I
Onsite Representative:..............Q.k r.................................................. Integrator:..............s�J� C3� ..........
Certified Operator:..P6L,-�-A.5.................... .....:....... _1.01 ......................... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 4 •L Longitude • ° «
Design Current
owinr Uapacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish /
Gilts
Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer El Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Wo
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in galtmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Y�No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q�No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes GKNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ANO
Structure I Structurc 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .................................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches):
5/00 Continued on back

IV
Facility Number: -7f( Date of inspection 4 -dD Printed on: 10/26/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes �No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes�Po
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? El Yes
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes10
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
11. Is there evidence of over appiig6tion? �❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes o
12. Crop type ( ;I M,_ / 1'1A A 151XI /
13. Do the receiving crops di er with those d ignated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes KNO
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
UrNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
o
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
L
No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
,Y10
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
\\
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
[R'No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
o
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
,�J No
23_
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes'
�'No
'P(No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
Q YlOja�lQ[1S.EtC aeElCieliCi�S Vf�CTC I1Qtt?a aR}i`)Ellg ��i15.V1SIt. YOB} . . I IeC�IV!? ill) [ll't le .'
6 res kidei & ibo' u . tftils .VIAL
- _. .. _
Com ents.(refer to question #j: Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendation`s or comments
:_Use drawings of facility to.better explain situations. (use additional pages as neiresssary): - - -
Reviewer/Inspector Name 15 )47
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: slo0

Facility Number: W. az I Date of Inspection Printed on: 10/2612000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ YesTNO
o
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 0
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes o
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes o
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
I-,N44itional Comments an ori ,raw r— -- - _
J
5100

J
Type of Visit
Reason for Visit
x-71 1--. ,
Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other
❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time: I ?, dt3 I Printed on: 10/26/2000
' =Not eirational Q Below Threshold
Permitted [:1 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: .... f..r.. .lay..../ngal . "a ................. County: ....... . .................. .......................
Owner Name: ��, , •..�r},f lr•� Phone Na: I is j.. . 3.�......1..�� 3. ..
................ ..... } .... .....................
Facility Contact:...a( d.xt.P.a✓........ ........ Title: Phone No:...................................................
.........1l..��... rr ...1..... ...............
2930. Mailing Address: 7.��.?......... ,f .1 r" .... ..� .' �.1[�=.......... { ..
Onsite Representatives [tSkt : ��t� ...... Integrator:................1....................................................
...............I --.....
Certified Operator:. , �• (1Q I .......................... ... ...� . Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm: j
• I T
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �' �� �•� Longitude
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
® Farrow to Finish y s"
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Ares
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes[ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other All
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? [j Yes fi� No
b. If discharge is observed• did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) [❑ Yes RNo
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes/t 11 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®1lo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes W�No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes KNo
J*
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..............................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
5/00 Continued on Lack

tfp „S..}./y['F�,..'�IP�.' A,• t. -t. yr_��. r'.t'__�l _ +.t.._ _...•c' ... ': __ '4', � �. ; .,-i—, ., ci�"J ti... .. .. - _ _
Facility Number: -75? — Date of Inspection l�J Printed on: 10/26/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, [-] yes [No
seepage, etc.} ��11
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes �No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes[ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 8,.140
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level 11
elevation markings? ❑ Yes CNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �o
11. Is there evidence of over applic'Ation? P Excessive PondingPAN /'1
❑ ❑Hydraulic Overload Yes RNo
12• Crop type
13- Do the receiving crops differ with thosede gnated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
I& Does the facility fail to have'alI components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yeso
ElYes No
❑ Yes I No
❑ YesI
❑ Yes {'No
❑ Yes RR O
❑ Yes 00
❑ Yes '`No
i
❑ Yes qNo
❑ Yes RNo
❑
Yes j No
❑ Yes MO
❑ Yes �KNo
❑ Yes &&o
a(icjris:or• defcienCies were notes during �bis;visit' Y:or� wiil >�eegiye Bio #'ui•ther. :
rtirres oridei�ce: ab.. f this viis1L • • • .. • . .
Comments (refer to gaeshon #} Explain any YES answers and/or. any recoi- mendatioii"ns or iiny other comments -r
:.
:Else d '_ 7in - of.facility'to better explain situations: (use additional pages as,necessaey} _ = m
rrei
Reviewer/Inspector Name o A
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:64z Date: o' t� 5/00
5•

f
Facility Number: -79 —rQ 1 Date of inspection Printed on: 10/26/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes Z'No
i
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property) 1
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 0
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes /[ N'0
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes )kj No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes �❑ No
omments:an _- -
on ar. rawtings:r:, --
5/00

S. Division of Soil andWaterConservaton _Uperatlon Review .: F
. Division of Soil and Water Conservatao� :Compliiance Inspiet�on_� _ G
r
Division of Water VU Mf ,COmphance lnspeCt:Ott } y ? 3
Other A eine " O eiahon Rev�ewx:��' �F K
Routine OComplaint Q Follow-up of DW_Q inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility NumberEUED_=�_j
Date of Inspection
'rime of inspection ± ZJ 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted Certified © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered JE3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ..........•
Farm Name:q
......................
..........°.�.�1.-a'r..........................n.r.......1...,�!'.H....-.-.......------....------ County:
Owner Name:..... ?.4.g_ �i.5.................. "k+�Q. .F...... Phone No......... . /..3Q.... ..fir. r ..1.............................
Facility Contact: Q Ccd 1� E ....Title ... Phone No: ...................................................
�2 2- t C ji D n�
Mailing Address: ... ....... I "' .�41�G ..!`...R). ............. .i''► .� r f..l.v�.......Z:
Onsite Representative :.......s.....-.....�.. .. Integrator:
GJttE'
Certified Operator:.... d uXJ./ .tC ...... Operator Certification Number:.._. %7. .._.•.__
.s....... ��
.........:
Location of Farm:
•--•.........................•---•-----------------..........---...........-----....------..................................-----.................-..-...-.............................................................--.........................I.......--.............. r
Latitude 0 ° 14 Longitude • 4 44
Design CtirrenfD!-". Correnti Design , Curr"int.
_r
Swine Ca acity Po ulabon "'Poultry '`C 'acity:Po'iillation Cattle - CapacityPo ulatian
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑Dairy
E] Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer 'R ❑ Non -Dairy =
❑ Farrow to Wean.-
_ W
❑ Farrow to Feeder Other =
Farrow to Finish S� Total DeMgn Capacity--
❑ Gilts - _
E] Boars ;Total SSL `
tNnmber of:Lagoon§ ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holdiag Pandsa Solid Traps `; ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made.!
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gaumin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I
Identifier: ��/�
Freeboard (inches): ...
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, ctc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes kNo
❑ YesTo
o
E] Yes
[]'yes, /�`No
ElJ` Yes No
❑ Yes W No
❑ Yes KNo
Structure o
[]Yes gNo
Continued on back

22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes Frio
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes jo No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes J[ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes Ef No
• 4
O V1Otatidtis'ot [leriCien'cies •were hO(ed O(Wing �his.vlslt, • Yolk .Wlii•tee iVe �iO llI't�lgi
Facility Number: •%F-5''7 Date of Inspection
_
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
E] Yes 4 N
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
f�-�m
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
066 recd 4s,
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes gNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes �' O
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
elevation markings?
❑ Yes XNo
Waste. Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes WO
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes fir—No
//Excessive
12. Crop type 6 fA A)i4�cz en�S
13. Do the receiving crops differ with tho a designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes ANO
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes KNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes $(No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes U�No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes 9 `No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes KNo
Required Records & Documents
IT Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes KNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes 0 No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes )RNo
2R Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes 0 No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ONo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes Frio
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes jo No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes J[ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes Ef No
• 4
O V1Otatidtis'ot [leriCien'cies •were hO(ed O(Wing �his.vlslt, • Yolk .Wlii•tee iVe �iO llI't�lgi
corres onrience about this visit. .: .:::
Gommenis. refer to, nestion # -E lain an .YES answers anil/or ate recommenuauons or aii other cninments r
?rP Y Y y
.� r x
Ilse drawm _ of facile to better ex tarn-srtuatinns use addrhonal a es as necess u ' -
f�-�m
066 recd 4s,
Reviewer/Inspector Name P rte, 77!-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
6 / 3/23/99

i 1
Facility Number:'7g-5
Odor Issues
Date of Inspection
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no. agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes gNa
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes QA No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes XNo
-Addition - omments an _or raWings _ -_
3123/99
3123/99

Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
Routine O Complaint 'O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC; review O Other
Date of inspection L-3—
Facility Number
Time of Inspection LIL,3024 hr. (hh:tnm)
Registered 13 Certified [3 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted 113 Not Operational /I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:.. 1�. ..... .rte-tc.... .r+� .......................... County:..1.i..R..II. 5a =...................................................
Ove rter Name:.. UG_s.4.5.....................14t tart P.i'. Phone No: 7 ....................................g9 ?3 .. ........
Facility Contact: .N.L.N01.0-5.........-�-Lill.. Title: fl.4r.>t.� �.... ... .....,�d........ ..................
...... ......... ....... Phone No:
....... ......
Mailing Address:.... �....�. �...6 ... .��.......................... �:.u-�+ b C rfz),,U
N. .....................
...... .......................... . ..... /
Onsite Representative: ......................................... Integrator:...................eA �(.Q............._..................
Certified Operator;........................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number:-----.
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude �• �� ���
De$tgrt; Ct,rr'ent""'°".x' „c „$,�, I]ICSSIgnx Gilrl'en#'. £. „4s'`°,� i�yr"'",sy"DeSlgn,,,Cn[reTi#
>Swme Ca acit P Mahon: Point �C aci Pti ulahonE Cat#le aCapacity°I'apulation k
x
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Layer #� ❑Dairy -Al
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer "
y � ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑Other A ".,
IM Farrow to Feeder 0
Farrow to Finish¢ Notal Design Capac><ty s�
❑ Gilts`
p ry.p
�' ❑ Boars 6 lota� SSLW
Number of Lagoons f HoldingPondsp ❑Subsurface Drains Presen# ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Feld Ares
....... ........ :.� � � . � �^ �'"• ��;
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance. man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does disch:uge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
0,No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
[kNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonslholding ponds) require
0Yes
❑ No
mai ntenance/improve ment?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
A No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
P(No
7125197
Continued
on back

Facility Number-79-
8.
umber:79-8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ANo
Structure. 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): ...........3.: ......... ....... I ...............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes gNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes'aNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes XNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? Yes ❑ No
Waste Application `
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes WNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ,........................................................................................................................... -................................ .-....... -....................... .....
.........
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMI')?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
M No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
O No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
P No
21.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
Yes
❑ No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Qnl_y
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
No;vioEations'or. deficiencies were noted during this.'visit+ .Yod.will iiceive-icoftiriher : -
. correspondence about this.visit.' ,
aX�+.,j �vw �' - -. F' -. ,;. •. X6F 2 m`kLda:. 3'n'3�f hcM :-TkW.it �.`"reaoui ;ala
Comments (refer #o gttestitEon #) Etrptaut any.,. S answers an or any ribbiitmendations or any other eommettts.
SA,iSt Yfi:'4':+e� AVStl9 Pry"i.Y' f )
>
'1'x:
Us tirwings pt tacihtyto bettersexpla srtttatians ,(use additional pagesa necessay)�
y
This 4cW- i5 usorKi•.� cw ccr-�` mal o•--
•
f
m[�-e �LAKS� 6p�r� � l ►le[�$� �GiV�4+ l7c�u(� ���1tS�r'nctr
r -O tw,n_O! Ir�tt
1 3, /Ve�s�P--s �?u"1� +narer b, 1 2-/31
2f . A10 eAe ON S�
7125197
t
Reviewer/Inspector Name-zt
ameReviewer/Inspector
Reviewer/InspectorSignature: Date: 2 -j
41

r -2D
~ ` State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources Y1A l • •
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p �
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
December 13, 1995
Mr. Douglas Humphrey
Rt. 10, Box 611
Lumberton, NC 28358
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Robeson County
Dear Mr. Humphrey:
On November 2, 1995, an inspection of your animal operation was performed by the
Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). Please find enclosed a copy of our Compliance
Inspection Report for your information. It is the opinion of this office that this facility is
in compliance with 15A NCAC 2H, Part .0217, and that Animal Waste Management is being
properly performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact me at (910)
486-1541.
Sincerely,
gzz:�, Ae.,,�
Ricky Revels
Environmental Technician IV
Enclosure
cc: Facility Compliance Group
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone 91a-486-1541 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Acton Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

. Site Requires Immediate Attention: IVO
��— Facility No. 7 S- -5'7
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: " - O Z 1 1995
Timem : / 1, SS
Farm Name/Owner-.- u .. A k ve.' _tea V V.%_ / .D a -%As I Q_s�-
Mailing Address: 10' Box' to 11 Lt -1-12U-4011 N c ZZ '35'g '
.County: Ra &,e N
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: la s- 1,..�=� Phone: Clio 739-9737-
Physical
3 - S3Physical AddressllA=tion: ym-k_y5ec4,b j o -F 52 - ►75_7 e!%d ,-7s7 A' &j Z I I
&Na 100
Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: z o d Number of Animals on Site: )-15
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
I,atltuft: • ' ^mow Longitude. • • w
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 finches) ( or No Actual Fmboard:_ t Ft. 2 Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or* Was any erosion observed? Yes oz(N
Is adequate land available for spray? ® or No Is the cover crop adequate? or No
Crop(s) being utilized: 1Ro. > C,.L>s a,.,l
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Q&i or No
100 Feet from Wells? (ITR or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes ori
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes ori
Is animal wast: discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or* If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreagewith cover crop)? Yes or
Additional Comments: •TA, S /I -ALc :z Q ro v 4 d (, CZ5, -G-
R'C&4
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.