780028_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

I
February 23, 2001
Mr. Paul Rawls
District Supervisor
N. C. D" E. N. R, Division of Water Quality
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, N. C. 28301-5043
CARROLL'S FOODS, INC.
P. O. Drawer 856
WARSAW, NORTH CAROLINA 28398
Re: NOV issued to Carroll's Farm 7703,7704,7711
Facility No's 78-30, 78-28, 78-100, Robeson County
Dear Mr Rawls,
As a follow-up to earlier correspondence from Mr. Leslie Stutts to you on 2-14-01 I asked Ms.Dawn
Williamson, Technical Specialist with Carroll's to investigate further and report back to me. She has
conducted a thorough analysis of the nutrient management plan, the record keeping system, the
irrigation plan, and related issues so that we could better understand why questions about over -
application would arise on this farm. She found that there was confusion on the part of our crew
relative to the nutrient management plan and that errors had been made in the pumping record
keeping procedures.
As a result of these findings we are in the process of revising the nutrient management plan, correction
any misunderstanding about the proper use of the plan, and the record keeping requirements. While
we are concerned about any deficiencies that your inspectors or our investigation may have discovered
I am confident that they are currently being addressed and should not re -occur. I will be glad to
answer any questions you may have about this matter.
incerely,
Don Butler
Environmental Compliance Manager
Cc: Gregg Schmidt
Bill Gill
Mark Pahl
Leslie Stuffs
Howard Hobson
Dawn Williamson
Carolyn Strickland

CARROU:S FOODS, INC.
Box 1767 - 325 McKay Street
Laurinburg, North Carolina 28353
PW 910/276-06M FX: 9101276-2950
February 14, 2001
Mr. Paul Rawls
11 `h District Supervisor
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Subject: Response to Notice of Violation
ff 6 1 r, 901191
Farms 7703, 7704, and 7711 Carroll's Foods
Facility No's 78-30, 78-28, and 78-100, Robeson County
Dear Mr. Rawls,
After the Soil and Water inspection October 26, 2001, we looked at how the
pumping information was entered and I had made an error in allowing the three farms to
pump on the same fields without taking a subtraction from the field no matter what farms
waste was applied. There is more than enough land to apply and more than enough
deficit to carry all three farms per the plans.
We will change our heading on our spray records to include the three farms, but
only allow one set of fields which will eliminate the above mentioned problems.
We are also reviewing and rewriting the waste plans to include changes in our
application process, i.e. center pivot irrigation.
If you have any further questions, please contact me at my office in Laurinburg
910-276-5637.
Sincerely,
V,e /-,V
Leslie Stutts
Farming and Environmental Manager
Laurinburg Division

1
North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Fayetteville Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 31, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Leslie Stutts
Carroll's Foods, Inc.
P. O. Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject: Notice of Violation
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2H .0217
Carroll's Farms #7703, #7704, and #7711
Facility Nos. 78-30, 78-28, and 78-100
Robeson County
Dear Mr. Stuffs:
ern
NCDENR
You are hereby notified that, having been Permitted to have a non discharge permit for the
subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217, you have been found to
be in violation of your 2H .0217 Permit.
On October 26, 2000, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Soil and
Water performed an annual review of the Carroll's Farms in Robeson County. The review
revealed that there was over application of nitrogen to the cotton crop at these farms as listed:
Field #3 (46% over), field #4 (20% over), field #5 (33% over), field #7 (21% over) and field #8
(42% over). This is a violation of your CAWMP and the General Permit Condition 111.6.f., which
requires Regional notification of over application. This violation was referred to the Division of
Water Quality, as required, by the Division of Soil and Water.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following item(s) be addressed:
1. Avoid over application of nitrogen to any crop in your CAWMP.
225 GREEN STREET - SUITE 714/ SYSTEL BUILDING / FAYETIEVILLE, NC 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] WWW- N .STA-j;E.NC.US/ENRI
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST CONSUMER PAPER
DENR TOLL FREE HOTLINE: [phone]

Mr. Stutts
January 31. 2001
Page 2
2. Over application shall be reported per the General Permit.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing it's General
Permit and being required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the Division
of Water Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00 per day per
violation.
Please provide a written response to this office on or before February 16, 2001 regarding
corrective actions taken or planned. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do
not hesitate to contact either myself or Mr. John Hasty, Environmental Specialist, at (910) 486-
1541.
Sincerely,
Paul E. Rawls
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
/jh
cc: Sonya Avant - Compliance Group
Ed Holland - Robeson Co. MRCS
Trent Allen - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Dennis Ramsey -Compliance Group
Central Files - Raleigh

w
North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources t� a + '
Division of Water Quality ���,�
Fayetteville Regional Office NCDENR
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 31, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Leslie Stutts
Carroll's Foods, Inc.
P. O. Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject: Notice of Violation
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 211.0217
Carroll's Farms #7703, #7704, and #7711
Facility Nos. 78-30,\78-28, and 78-100
Robeson County
Dear Mr. Stutts:
You are hereby notified that, having been Permitted to have a non discharge permit for the
subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217, you have been found to
be in violation of your 2H .0217 Permit.
On October 26, 2000, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Soil and
Water performed an annual review of the Carroll's Farms in Robeson County. The review
revealed that there was over application of nitrogen to the cotton crop at these farms as listed:
Field #3 (46% over), field #4 (20% over), field #5 (33% over), field #7 (21% over) and field #8
(42% over). This is a violation of your CAWMP and the General Permit Condition I1I.61, which
requires Regional notification of over application. This violation was referred to the Division of
Water Quality, as required, by the Division of Soil and Water.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following item(s) be addressed:
I . Avoid over application of nitrogen to any crop in your CAWMP.
225 GREEN STREET - SUITE 714 / SYSTEL BUILDING / FAYETTE,VILLE, NC 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] WWW.ENR. TATE.�-C.US/Eti&
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- 500/6 RECYCLED/10% POST CONSUMER PAPER
DENR TOLL FREE HOTLINE: [phone]

e
Mr. Stutts
January 31.2001
Page 2
2. Over application shall be reported per the General Permit.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing it's General
Permit and being required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the Division
of Water Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00 per day per
violation.
Please provide a written response to this office on or before February 16 2001 regarding
corrective actions taken or planned. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do
not hesitate to contact either'myself or Mr. John Hasty, Environmental Specialist, at (910) 486-
1541.
Sincerely,
f' )
t/
Paul E. Rawls
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
/j h
cc: Sonya Avant - Compliance Group
Ed Holland - Robeson Co. NRCS
Trent Allen - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Dennis Ramsey -Compliance Group
Central Files - Raleigh

d- .
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DW2 inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection ` �d
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
19 Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [j Registered 0 Not Operational Date Last Operated: M. A ............ ....... -.....
Farm Name: ....�................................................................................. County: -........... (�1_ d!" ............... ....
.................
Owner Name: j {
�.1..1' ]L..�.l.... f..._. ... .... p 5. . C �................... Phone No:....... .7(d...1.. G.7 .................
.. .. ' I .......
Facility Contact:.._.es_.... ...............................Title:... ......�.................. Phone No:
Mailing Address: ....... .... D A'-_ r................ 1.:?....Y........................ . .. .. f ..(Y �r Onsite Representative- ....... /'. 1. .*�% Integrator:
Certified Operator: ..... .......... * ... .... ............... ­ ............ ... .. Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude �• �' �
$wine -
>_ ❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
- Design :'Current
;n.:; Poultry _Ca 'acity, 'Population..
7 I--i i .aver '-
�❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ No Liquid Waste
2
Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in oat/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) El YesiNo
No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yeso
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes M No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Freeboard (inches) : ......................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on bark

41. 1.
Facility Number: 7 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidenceQf over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding [IFAN
12. Crop type
0,
r/��Sni
304
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designKed in the Certifi?,Animal Waste M�agemen(Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for band application? r!
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reauired Records & Documents
IT. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20- Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
10 yiQl'atigris'oi dercjehcie .mere pote during this. :vis. it. ; - You iviii•tee�iye nt #-urtboe ... : -
:. corresa ides& about: this visit
..... ..::::: . :....... .
❑ YeSA No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes )10
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �"o
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes #No
❑ Yes JgNo
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �UNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes \ No
❑ YesNo
i
►.�� _: -z
Reviewer/Inspector Name / "=
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: t,. ^ Date: 1�C�_

Facility Number:"? — Z Date of Inspection Z D
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes XNO
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes [�N0
roads, building structure, and/or public property) .1
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes RNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or j�
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes �No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ONe--
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
March 17, 2000
CERTIFIED AIL.
RETURN RECEIPT REQUI=STED
Mr. Howard Hobson
Carroll's Foods, Inc.
P.D. Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Carroll's Foods, Inc.
Facility No. 78 - 28
Permit No. AWS7M8
Robeson County
Dear Mr. Hobson:
On January 31, 2000, you or staff from your farm notified the Fayetteville Regional Office
of the Division of Water Quality, as required by General Permit condition 111.6.e, that the freeboard
level of the lagoon was less than the minimum required by the General Permit. The liquid lever of
the lagoon was reported as 18 inches. General Permit condition V.3 states that `The maximum
waste level in lagoonststorage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate
storage to contain the 25-rear, 24-tour storm event plus as additional 1 foot of structural freeboard'.
The Division of Water Quality will take no further action for this reported incident at this
isms. However, you are asked to please notify this office in writing within 15 days of reoeipt of this
letter as to what date the lagoon was lowered to the required freeboard level. This information is
essential in determining if the lagoon was lowered within the specified time frame in which the Plan
of Action (POA) allotted. It will also dose this event out within your file. If you have any questions
concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact myself at (910) 4864541,
Sincerely,
Robert F. Heath
Environmental Specialist
cc: Sonya Avant - Compliance Group
Central Files
Trent Allen - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Ed Holland - Robeson County NRCS
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/109v' POST -CONSUMER PAPER

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also Complete
item 4 it Restricted Delivery is desired.
Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front It space permits_
1. Article Addressed to:
Howard Hobson
Carrolls Foods Inc
Po Drawer 856
Warsaw NC 28398
AA. Receiv by (Please Print Clearly) 1 9, "" r livery
L,
-%e a n 1 6120 00
C. Signature
X ,� _ ` ❑ Agent
oYW�/�. p Addressee
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No
2(b2Z MC 24-Weor
3. Service Type
certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee} 0 Yes
2. Article Number (Cop from service label)
Z 160 988 H4
PS Form 3811. July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-99-M-1769

HIGH FREEBOARD NOTIFICATION
DAT MME
DwQ Ccmtcct y_ �. I~t��-
!game of Person 1
r�orrrocting DWC _ L S_ Tek;�a Na.r
Fc iiity No. -? �- ~ Z
/i
Freeboard level, of the Lags
Conditions of the sproy fields: WC& „^
NAE- A'TIVE: (include ony instructions given to the farmer of the time of the rail}
(A copy of each notification should be forwarded to the `CAFO BO)(' in John Hastys office
a5 soon Us possible)

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Carroll's Foods Inc
7704
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear Carroll's Foods Inc:
lffl'�OWA
1
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999 C E V
FAYE-Fi EMU=
REG. OFi+iCE
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 78-28
Robeson County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRYS, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLDI, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement_
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
J Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Robeson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Senice Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycle&10% post -consumer paper

June 7, 1999
John Hasty
Environmental Engineer
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
CARROLL'S FOODS , INC.
P.O. BOX 1767 • 325 MCKAY ST.
LAURINBURG, NORTH CAROLINA 28353
PH:910/276-0648 FAX[phone]
nod '—..
JU�v 9 1999
F,qKETTZ�V',LLE
Red. OFFICE
SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO DEFICIENCY
Farms 7711, 7703, 7704
Facility numbers 78-100, 78-30, 78-28
Robeson County
Dear Mr. Hasty,
I apologize for this response being past its return date. The farms are in the
process of having their plans reworked. We have some additional pivot points to put in
later. These will change the plan again. The hold up is getting the crop rotation correct
with the local farmer and matching to the hydrant acres.
This was to let you know that we are working to get this deficiency corrected. If
you have any questions please contact me at 910-276-0648 ext. 432.
Sincerely,
C� y1wa;
Leslie Stuffs
Farming and Waste Manager
Laurinburg Division
Id

1
_ T. - --
[� Division of Soel and Water'ConservatWn - Operation eview
0 Division of Sor! and Water Conservation - Compliance lnspection
Division of Water. Quality = Cotnpliancelnspection,
j] Otheir Agency -,Operation Review
Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-u of DWQ inspection O Follo+v-u )f DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number hate of Inspection
l-ime of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
*Permitted © Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered E3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ....... * 7.7a.� ......................... (aunty:..... Q/. h-........................................
................ ..................................
O-,vner Namc:....CeQ r`Q.1-[-..f ....-.-..-..L.--�a�f �. f'�`�.r.......................... Phone No:..........................L.�1. f.............. ...............................................
Facility Contact: ........... 11. 7..................................... Title:.......h!e:...���, Ls Phone No:
MailingAddress: ......I....Q. ........ ........................................................... ...... cLrSa�.�7..N...�................................ ...... .-3.........
//.......... z
Onsite Representative: eS.......`�4............................................................ Intcgrator......................................................................................
Certified Operator:... K.K. ............................�.......................... Operator Certification Number :..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude • �� Longitude
Design Current
awiue t,apactty
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean 60
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population_
❑ Layer I I_ ❑ Dairy
Non -Layer I I�1 ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other I I__ 1
Total Design Capacity 2 y Do
Total SSL W
Number of Lagoons r ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacfs
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if disrhaqTc is observed, was the conveyance man-inade'!
1). II'discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in �,alhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than froth a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate`?
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Frcchuard (inches}: ....__
21
`,
❑ Yes go No
❑ Yes 4 No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes kNo
Structure 6
116/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: —1g'-25 I Date of Inspection 12-Zq- D
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion. ❑yesNo
seepage, etc.) +�t
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes "6No
Waste ADDlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes [131 No
11. is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen ❑Yes (A No
12. Crop type ....... ��1�......./4 f ......................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? Yes ❑ No
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint)
❑ Yes
nNo
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
ONO
16- Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
U9 No
Required Records & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
P(No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
ONO
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
Cl Yes
J No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
5�No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Oc/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
&o
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
0 No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same ag*ency?
❑ Yes
No
C].1V�.vi( iations:or deficiencit<s .were noted. during this: visit:. Yoti wifl.retveive i u' further .: .
...... pot<i d e itc e. . .....visit.; . ; .. . ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary).
�t � . /�hsa�, kts S��u,�P� f � �,ec� � la.�. � ea•1�,K � n q � �s �'T,�t wr`� 77� � �- -
r"
y,kcP.'J.tq wit`#e,— 4r berPtL1k .R graze
a-� j S�a�l rai>ti UrQ�e o►`'Je►� itif ram, PIa-t,� J
1wCIkJe brrk-. wkea4 �4_3 S �e s , �,s rs _& be `fk
l � � e C ro; ►k9
1` t CAS i t+` A p n— I6er c1�• j j o_ c{r r-e aS, 66
erWi��/ 1Oot>:S C7odd 4-
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: -2-q —M 11/6/99

State of North Carolina RECEIVED
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources JUL 2 3 i995
Division of Water Quality
FAYETTEVILLE
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor [AEG. OFFICE
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 26, 1998
Carroll's Foods Inc.
7704
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw NC 28398
r4ir•
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENviRONMENT AND N.aruRAL RESOURCES
Subject: Reissuance of Certificate of Coverage
No.AWS780028
7704
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and
Application System
Robeson County
Dear Carroll's Foods Inc.:
The Division of Water Quality modified the Swine Waste Operation General Permit originally issued to
this facility on July 28, 1997. In accordance with the issuance of the revised General Permit, we are
forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Carroll's Foods Inc., authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but
not limited to, the management of animal waste from the 7704, located in Robeson County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 2400 Farrow to Wean and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003, and shall hereby void
COC No AWS780028 dated July 28, 1997. The COC shall hereby incorporate by reference any specific
conditions of the previous COC issued to this facility. The purpose of this COC is to allow coverage
under the revised General Permit. Please review the revised General Permit (enclosed) and pay
particular attention to Condition II.10 regarding tree removal from lagoon embankments, Condition IH.I
regarding inspection frequency of the waste treatment, storage and collection system and Condition II1.6
regarding notification requirements for system failures, spills and emergencies. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS780028
7704
Page 2
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact Katharine Keaton at [phone] ext. 533.
ncerely,
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Robeson County Health Department
Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Robeson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

D
Facility Number ate of Inspection
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered ;$Certified © Applied for Permit g,Permitted 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
(� p
Farm Name: .............. �.nn.1 1............... County:...............!`?��.Sc9!.:i..................................
........ .............................................................
Owner Name: Ca�ra.. I S j ......... Phone No: ?149-- d%9 .3V 3 ...........
Jj...�.. ...........................................---- ........---
Facility Contact: L 5.1 C 51 .. Title: ......... Phone No:
pp 1, �
Mailing Address: ........ tr .......�Q� �.....F;g.......I.. W....°� rSaw.�...... A/ C o?�3
................................................... ............ ..... ........ ...................
.......
.�
. t—T4; -
Onsite Representative: ................... J.. OL............................................. lntegrator:.............l/Y. .......... ...........
n
Certified Operator, ..............&.If1.45............ L...tal/..15.............. p ........... ........ Operator Certification Number: .........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 =1
=11 Longitude ' 6 Os&
q : Design " Current
Design Current { =t Design Cre urnt
Swuie µ Ca actt , 'ulation
P Y p
Poult ry Capactty,..Populafton Cattle=
y ... ,.
❑ Wean to Feeder
. ,Capacity'Popiiiatian
. ❑Layer ❑Dairy„
❑ Feeder to Finish
'` [] Non -Layer I .'. ❑ Non-Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
:, ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
A 'Total Design Capa,&i
❑ Gilts
".
❑ Boars
Total S5LW
b Number of Lagoons /Holding Ponds; ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JUSprayField Area
4` � �fi1 M§� -.1 Jr4 3aR� � :. Yra �. • ��`�3F"F:
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ,� No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discbarge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance than -made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? AI(A
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes fid No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes X No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes W No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ;K-No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes Wf No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes C4 No
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Number:
OCIS
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? El Yes P(No
Structures (Lavoons,tioldini! Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Wo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure. 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(fty .......... ..................... .................................... ................................... .................................... ....................................
....................................
10-
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
El Yes
P(No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity ol'any of the structures observed?
El Yes
C XNo
12-
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes
0 No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'!
El Yes
Pd No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
C1 Yes
JKNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type c4may. 1WW.V14.V4j 4je�­­ ae. I
.................... .. ....... j..
.................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?'
Yes
XNo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
KNo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
0 Yes
LgNo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
0 Yes
XNo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0 Yes
JO No
21.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with oil -site representative?
Cl Yes
PNo
22.
Does record ke'eping need improvement?
0 Yes
0 No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
El Yes
WNo
24-
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP')
E3 Yes
No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0 Yes
No
0 No.violitions" or deficiencies were noted during this.visit.- You.will receive no further
correspondence about this. visit.','-'..
any' ,VTS answers and/or'-antr'eco'�m"xnendations of.any other
' toirin entstA_�i,
,er
erexp -U riwings,of facility t6 bett' i�in situations. (use additional pages as necessary
*Uvl� &.It V-64 a-td ad
arVVb1
yV1_ Aar 5w, alk:7
Ir- j - f0no_j UVUJ
7/25197
Reviewer/] n-Specto r Name
Reviewerlinspector Signature: Date: 4L —.;28, gam

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT _REQUESTED
Carroll's Foods Inc
7704
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw NC 28398
Farm Number: 78-28
Dear Carroll's Foods Inc :
I Li
IDEHNR
June 11, 1997 R-E
gEIVED'
10 1997
FF, f .,� T 4 FAYETTEVILLE
AEG. C �-CE
REG. C;= 4*.0"
You are hereby notified that 7704, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has thirty
dau to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with
Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date.
Your application must be returned within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the
application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for
each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package. The
signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location map, and
two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the application
package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any question concerning this letter, please call John Jallah at [phone] extension
364 or Ed Buchan with the Fayetteville Regional Office at [phone]
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Fayetteville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535. Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
- An Equal oppe&dmity-Affif native Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

6. Is fixity not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after I/I/97)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be property closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is structural fetboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon I Lagoon 2
-. 2W1
0 Yes
W No
❑ Yes
PfNo
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes ® No
Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the stnecb=? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? E3 Yes R No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenanceliimproveznent? ❑ Yes ® No
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels? ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
I4. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes tgNo-
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
J_
15. Crop type //�+y- ..
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan? ❑ Yes Flo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes .3 No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 29 No
Far Certified Facilities Oaly
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way? ❑ Yes ® No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
23. Does facility require a fallow -up visit by sauce agency? ❑ Yes W No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewImspection with owner or operator in charge? ❑ Yes ANo
Commentsp(refer to question 1 kF,xpIaui'any yFS arsswers andlOT. a ec91 ons or any atlidi comments.` _ , 5
Use draar qgs of facilkt) E ettcrpe�cp1,-. situations {use add Anal pages as�necessa y) 9 „� A "_ 5—
� 3. �"�� �/�fi� i�9� ��,6,�,��✓ ,6%c,,�✓ ov,�,� fjN NjF/ s 62�s,� may' �
ak- 4"
4
a
Reviewer/inspectorName xaa§ary��4-„1 p
Reviwer/Iaspector Signature: Date:
cc- Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Secdon, Facility Assessment Unit 1 1 /14/96

10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ ins eetion O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection - -•9 7
Facility Number 7 2 Time of Inspection :fv I Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: R� Total Tune (in hours) Spent onReview LL
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Nam: -7 County:
Owner Name: �' '�cpl�s,, C'va ,,:� f '" c • ....,.. Phone No:.,.� 9�d 76
Mailing Address:72 �� �� ��� f �'SrhtJ A'
Onsite Representative: _ ems, l ��'`�.� _.. Integrator. C' '`�- /� .f zz.yC .
Certified Operator. r^- m ...X "'�" ^�� Operator Certification Number.
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 a a Longitude Q• '
113 not O erational Date Last Operated:
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
�,' svv%!' F � �� l
�Swiae��Numhei��Ponitry,,za
� �Nna�ber a
'CaNumtie
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ ❑Dairy
Feeder to Finish Non- �y ❑Beef`
Farrow to Wean r a
Farrow Feeder Ell
Farrow to Finish F ❑Other Type of Livestock
s. � �'°O�` � t - 5a ID �a t'� ri' ��,. <-�' �'� fin. . i 'yr.# � � �•
f Number of Lagoons l:Holding Ponds Subsurface Drains Present
FD Lagoon
Area Spra y Field Area
!Gener2l
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenaamlimpmvement? ❑ Yes allo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes )a No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes Z.No
b. If discharge is observed, did it mach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ( No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
3. Is them evidence of past discharge fsvm any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ;KNo
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes Eallo
S. Does any part of the warn management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes PNo
maintenancrfmiprovement?
Continued on back

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Donald P. Butler
7704
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear Donald P. Butler:
A If
4
�EHNR
July 28, 1997 A.U. 2 9 1997
�I=L�`s:
REG. OFFjC!�-
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS780028
7704
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Robeson County
In accordance with your application received on July 14, 1997, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) to Farm No. 78-28, authorizing the operation of an animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with the State's General Permit (attached). This
approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of
animal waste from the 7704 Farm, located in Robeson County, with an animal capacity of no greater than
2400 Farrow to Wean and the application to a minimum of 78 acres of land as specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2001. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of
wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data
and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater
than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
r
�eA. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Robeson County Health Department
,Fayetteville:Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Robeson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Envlronment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
Jaynes B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Mr. Leslie Stutts
P.O. Box 1767
Law inburg, NC 29353
Dear Mr.
Soft -
[DaHNFt
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 7, 1997
SUBJECT: Ammuat Compliance inspection
C*rW's Food Swine Farms
Registration No. 78-27, 78-28, 78-30
Rd== County
On April 3 & 4, 1997, staff from the Fayetteville Renal Office of the Division of
Water Quality inspected the subject swine facility. Pleas find enclosed a copy of our
Compliance Inspection Repot for your information. - It is the opinion of this office based on
the information provided and observations made during the inspection that the facility was in
compliance with 15A NCAC 2H, Part.0217 at the time of the inspection. Please refer to the
comments section on the rear of the inspection form for information regarding your facility.
Please be aware that all swine facilities with a liquid waste collection system designed for
a minimum of 250 hogs must have a certified waste mangement plan on or before December
31, 1997. The district NRCS office, Agriculture Extension office, or the Division of Soil
and Water have specWist available to assist you with upgrading of ousting faabdes and
certification.
If You have any questions concerning this matter, please tail Robert Heath at (910) 48&
1541.
si�ay,
Robert F. Heath
Environmental Specialist
cc: operations Branch
Central Files
Audrey Oxendine - FRO DSW
Ed Holland - Robeson Co. NRCS
Wachovla Building, Suite 714. Fayetteville FAX [phone]
North Caropna 28301-5W NO An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action s mployer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Routine O Com laint O Follow-o of DW is ectioa O Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of,F Iaspcctlau -9 7
FaclHty Number 7 Time of Inspection Un U br. time
Farm Seam:: - R�/7 4E,9 - - - - - Total Time (in boors) Spent onRevlew
or Inspection (indndes travd and processing)
Farm Name: -- 7d --- - County:
//']gyp 4� 40�y � Q / (�j--�_
Owner Name: • 11ss tyO� G ' Phone No: [G Z 76 -4:: 51j
Mailing Address: �? D.?�.-�.E,t,.. 9W w �Ps-
01
Otssite Representative. Cd� CW%
Cettlded Operator. �.� ••R �€•✓�r� _ - Operator Capon Number-.
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
15 Not O rational 3 Date Last operated:
'type of Operation and Design Capadty
"SMY�rte :,yt rx xaPoaltry�.
�. „ � •� <,Number�; � • N�berh-.�: xo: r .a1�Tttalbe!"��.,a.
Wean to feeder � V `
Feeder to Finish' Nan- Beef
®R
arrow to Wean
F to h
F w to F nish ` 0 Other 3j►pe of Lirestock
f Number of L:;ooni lS dd n Ponds R Subsurface Drains Present `
� �'-r :_� -
L
Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
I . Are there say buffers that need maintemacefin-avenmt?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a. If discharge is observed, wss the conveyance gran -made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Swfact Wares? II? yes, notify DWty
G If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yea. notify DWty
I h there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operldon?
4. Was there any adverse hqucts to the waters of the Stan otiw than from a diwhatge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonslboldmg ponds) require
E3 Yes MrNc
p Yes IM No
❑ Yes ,BNo
13 Yes at No
❑ Yes
(UNo
E3 Yes
gNo
El Yes
RNo
tl Yes
ANo

Is fie ty not in compliance with any applicable se&ac.�c criteria?
Did the ice► fail to have a certified operator in teRmwhle charge Cif inspection after InS7)?
Are there lagoons or storage ponds an site which need so be properly cloud?
Is ran=tuuI fiseboard less thaw adequate?
Freeboard ($)- Lagoon 1
p. R
DO. Is seepage observed tram any of tb c :trued a 1
Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
P I. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of my of the structures observed?
Do any of the structures need
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the dmtion posy an
immediate public health or environmental threat, tastily DWQ
Do any of the structures lack adquate rna k=S to identify start and stop pumping levels?
4. L these physical evidence of over appliatioa?
.(If in cLem of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWt)
3. crop type b � .......
6. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal waste Managen ent Plan?
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
Does the cover crop need improvement?
Is there a lack of available irrigation eguiprnent?
. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Aaima3 Watts Management Plan rainy available?
. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
Does Lc= keeping aced impwvcmem?
Does pity require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Did ReviewerMspectar fail to disease reviewfmspecdoa witb owner or operator in charge?
t] Yes No
13Yes ;KNo
U Yes 13 No
E3 Yes ® No
Lagoon 4
O Yes ® No
C] Yes 10 No
0 Yes ® No
13 Yes ❑ No
© Yes IgNo
13 Yes BNo
E3 Yes 33No
E3 Yes JU No
13 Yes IN No
E3 Yea 0 No
[I Yes ® No
9 Yes E3 No
E3 Yes 19 No
Q Yes ANo
t Ammmts, (tefer 1D querdon is spiam'srry YFS aaswa- and/orar�yy r err
bc. u r .
Uscidrasy=gs: tQf'facrity.�o tietter upiam dtuatiainsu'se aitiama]:pages as -' ARdO
r.�. �� �x/�`i� m ��,6.E�.✓ 6/ew,✓ evr�' fry✓ N / -r ,Q�s� � %
a s . , R,'. �- �< 14. � /,� ol- AC10,104A .
Revkrrer/Inspettor Name= ',� '',-` , `,' '"`"`_ �; "•
ReviwerAnspector Signattum. •��,� Darer

Facility Number.• 7$_ Z IT
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: Grzo/9G
Time: / 4A op
General Lnformation:
Farm Name: C vr,a l l s r-oa d s "�' 7 7 0'A -County: Rb6 GSpN
Owner Name: moo► rro i I 's roads ="c . Phone No:
On Site Representative: A 1 Lane e,, Integrator. �a•� II's F �� s
Mailing Address: Po D Ls t. r Ss G
wo-v-.50' s I /1(C Z T 3 9 g
Physical Address/Location: B . Earl- arud vvc- . cd a6VL.,
2w.i��S _ �.+v.-r R7�1,� a►a+a �R-i1z! O.d e A7'.,•-- ev�s-anrct
Latitude: I I Longitude: 1 I
Qperation DescraptiOM (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poidtry No. of Animals Type of Carle No. of Animals
L KOW '7 (+o o D Layer 0 Dairy
❑ Nursery O Non -Layer 0 Beef
O Feeder
DtherType of Livestock Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: l (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
acili
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour stonn storage?: �-% !
Yes ❑
No [�
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?:
Yes ❑
No CB�'
Is erosion observed?:
Yes ❑
No 3'
Is any discharge observed?
Yes ❑
No Gr
0 Man-made 12 Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Yes ❑
No M'
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
S
Yes ❑
No a"'
list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type; C;:, g A gn:A.k....., l Acreage:
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?
Yes ❑
No
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Yes ❑
No UIr
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS BIue Line Stream?
Yes ❑
No e
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
Yes ❑
No 3
AOI — January 17,1996

Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes O No 0�
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes 0 No M'
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes ❑ No C�
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? Yes ❑ No CY'
C,*4. -W FCOO si 9
Explain any Yes answers:
Signature:
cc. Faciliry Assessment Unit
Drawings_ orObseMtiOL..
n
Date: 9�1 %Zo %Y 4
Use Attachments if Needed
-- � - - •.nnrti t'1. —.. Rri' -•. hr�a '-,��' •.j.�a.�+ f.....1r.. �-.-.a,--... .�.
AOT — January 17,19%

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Carroll's Foods, Inc.
116 James Street
Laurinburg, NC 28352
Dear Sir:
[DEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 25, 1996
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Carroll's Foods Swine Farms
Robeson County
On .tune 20 1996, an inspection of several of your animal operations was performed by the
Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). Please find enclosed a copy of our Compliance Inspection
Report for your information. It is the opinion of this office that these facilities are in compliance
with 15A NCAC 2H, Part _0217, and that Animal Waste Management is being properly performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact me at (910) 486-
1541 ext. 325.
Sincerely,
Ricky Revels
Environmental Technician N
Enclosure
cc: Facility Compliance Group
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville ���A FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50%recycled/ 10%post-consumer paper

FacUiry Number: 7 - L -Zf
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: %zO/y61
Time:. /to0
rimeral Information:
Farm Name: Cu wo /1 `s F-ac �t s '4' 7 7 O 9A aunty: f?o bcsoN
Owner Name: -T"C- Phone No:
On Site Representative:_ ..._ AI La -----Integrator. Cacrro I f'r Asa! s
Mailing Address: O D VC, c.j et tr SS
4 Q z 7 3 4 g
/Lo Physical Addresscation: F^ a;... A4r < e,, t-Kc- -74- Su-s. Eox4-- aA J n C- -r.d a6c,,(-
2 w+i Imr-S r e.+ ;a; t.. o a+ o S R- - If Z 1 a rvd f4
`► s I. Z S �,, /�.s ,N tF 4 le-lpf Ls- e4t J-Ga..+1�
Latitude: I I Lon 'rude: 1 I
eration Descri ti : (based on design characitrisdcs)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Caule No. of Animals
19'Sow 2i+u G O Layer ❑ Dairy
0 Nursery 0 Non -Layer ❑ Beef
0 Feeder
OtherTjpe of Livestock Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: % (include in the Drawings and Observations the &=board of each lagoon)
acility In ect"
I.agoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Is seepage observed from the. lagoon?:
Is erosion observed?:
Is any discharge observed?
o Man-made a Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
( lirt the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: C.:,,,-�+-A ►�•..�tw..l Acreage:
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Is animal waste land applied or spray imgated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
AOI — January 17,19%
Yes ❑
Yes ❑
Yes ❑
Yes ❑
Yes ❑
Yes ❑
Yes 0
No C9'
No CR'**'
No ar'
No @r
No31*'
No 3'
No [�
Yes ❑
No lr
Yes ❑
Yes ❑
No C3�/
No C�

Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes ❑ No
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes 0 No
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes 0 No Or,
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? Yes ❑ No 0'
C,4, -W E-000 919
Explain any Yes answers:
Signature:
cc.- Facility Assessment Unit
Prawings orQbservations•
Date: & / zzO l ? 4
Use Attachments if Needed
- � - ♦can nr Z.:-..- : � _ .' 'n wt C�ht' r�i,��. T. ti♦•�. 1'+•' ..-.--.a,-...- _ -�. '
AOI — January 17,1"6

I
Site Requires Immediate Attention: NO
Facility No. 7 S - Z 8
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: -S^ 14 P+ , 1995
Time: 18 : V a
Farm Name/Owner: C o v Y o i k ' st -7 -7o 4 earvo II s Fo o / Z.vC .
Mailing Address:kfi, I Box /O _ i'NQX'Ae.v WC z 9364
County: Robeso.,�
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location: S!z //Z1 -VeaY M0X_ 0A1
Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: _ Z,y-oo w- Number of Animals on Site: Z �oO
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3+ ° 4/ ' 29 " Longitude: 79 ° /9' zo
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) es or No Actual Freeboard: 3 Ft. 0 Inches
Was any seepage observed from the la oon(s)? Yes or(9 Was any erosion observed? Yes Or
Is adequate land available for spray? Ye or No Is the cover crop adequate? (gOor No
Crop(s) being utilized: sfa
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? a or No
100 Feet from Wells? (Oor No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or®
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes oQ�
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or® If Yes, Please Explain. +
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? 6 or No
Additional Comments:
Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Signature
Use Attachments if Needed.

.
V
AM • !Cl Mf
.. ;
WA
_
,•\ j
IM
l n jai
+10,
ik4'•
mar
lam y
,
r,. , K -rw.... _. - -_= •.+J
urn
NAGEMENT
shuck FAYF7TEV1 E REG. OrFlCE
-
L ,.Lai
nown by many local
�. ,..
*'
ffi
IM
known being ground
��
'fir
,tern marmot.
'A S
Z.
ember of the widely
and is actually a big,
,ffi
ng member of the
x
family. It seems
y
;iate the small -tailed,
-
Pigging woodchuck
u�
lender, tree -climbing
}
a.,
If we remember also
gophers, and ground
z s
easier to understand.
ionally reminds us
:D
rrel ancestry by clim-
Is or to keep a better
r
ritory.
Moan '
(j IQ
tailed typical hiber-
�rs. When the tern-
'M
in fall, about
chu fat as a
awls down to his
�l „
he hole in after him
,$
the passage to the
e
O %
or the winter.
,_
)ernation, nothing is
%
Wed W be converted
idation of the blood
contrary, the lungs
ere is an occasional
"
ation of breath -but
oxygen in the lungs
E by the slow heart /
La
of gases.
woodchucks do
LM -
inter sleep promp-
�.
,,,, LM
\�
wond, to watch for /,� • .:h'
or earth as the case \,
10=
a tan
ecome restless and � •
�-
quently during late
"• '� =r
ally coming out to
.
gone and tender
Ids.
relieved to be in 0
are born in late
small and un- ,
y blin or about a -?
fronden until ��
s of y begin
)rm of grass and
able to get out to
i parents, attends AAM
ving them where
as some of the `
i
Lao
Uft
M.
,a
PAM "
IM

101 00 100 00:00
021 P02
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
November 4, 1994
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
County
Dear
on , , an inspection of your animal operation was performed
by
the
Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). Please find enclosed
a copy
of
our
Compliance Inspection Report for your information. It is the
opinion
of
this
office that this facility is in compliance with 15A NCAC 2x,
Part .0217,
and
that Animal Waste Management is being properly performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel
free to
contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Enclosure
cc: Facility Compliance Group

021 P03
LI
NORTH ChROLnIA DEPARTl0 U OF IIWMMQUWr, HEALTH & PATU AL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF IIMIRO QO=AL KANAGSMENT
Fayetteville Regional Office
Animal Operation Compliance inspection Farm
Y?MWAVi
� /M:bkn4S�Y��xl�►� M
r � �
7�D
+�MM.r.q-.
�Y
Y � w•
All questions answered negatively will be discussed in sufficient detail in
the Comments Section to enable the deemed Permittee to perform the appropriate
corrections:
SECTION I
Animal._Opera icn yoe:
Horses, cattle, swine, poultry, or sheep
Z " •a Milo
1. Does the number and type of animal meet or exceed
the (.0217) criteria? [Cattle (100 head),
horses PS), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and
poultry (30,000 birds with liquid waste
system)]
2. Does this facility meet criteria for
Animal Operation BMISTRATION?
3_ Are animals confined fed or maintained
in this facility for a 12-month period?
4. Does this facility have a CERTrFISD ANIMAL
iiAM XhMkG=U= PLAN?
5. Does this facility maintain waste management
records (Volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with
specific cover crop)?
6. Does this facility meet the SCS minimum
setback criteria for neighboring houses,
wells, etc?
Y I N I CAS
I ./

§ite Management
1. Is animal waste stockpiled or -lagoon
construction Within 100 ft. of a USGS
Map Blue Line Stream?
2. Is animal waste land applied or spray
irrigated within 25 ft. of a OSGS Map
Blue Line Stream?
3. Does this facility have adequate acreage
on which to apply the waste?
4. Does the land application site have a
cover crop in accordance with the
�IFIGT'i� p;YJ1N7
5. Is animal waste discharged into Waters of
the state by man-made ditch, flushing system,
or other similar man-made devices?
b. Does the animal waste management at this
farm adhere to Best Management Practices
{ NP) of the approved r' i U CATIOW
7. Does animal Waste lagoon have •sufficient«'�
freeboard? How much? (Approximately 2.5-3 )
S. Is the general condition of this CAFO facility,
including management and operation,
satisfactory?
SECTION �Y
Comm2at ss
V Y I N I CofflMns 11
III

:acEi n�,
;AOG 2 1995
- ENV. MANAGEMENT
FAYETTEVILLE REG. OFFICE

State of North Carolina
Department Of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 12, 1996
Carroll's Foods Inc.
7704
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw NC 28398
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Carroll's Foods 7704
Facility ID#: 78-28
Robeson County
Dear Farm Owner:
RECEIVED
Nall 12 1996'
FAYMEV LLE
RFG- OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 91gn33-0026.
Sincerely,
A:` �4_onoward, Jr., E.,JD'ctor
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, eyeC FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 SM. recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Information contained in this database is from non agency sources and is considered unconfirmed
Farm Emergency Call Form
Farm Number
Date
- -
Farm Name
Time
Owner First Name
Call Number
1926
Owner Last Name
arr0 S Foods Inc
p Reportfag Q Complalrl
Source
Plan Due Date Date Plan Date Freeboar
ILes Stutts
Inches (7 equals blank) Received Level OK
Breached
10 Yes O No
Freeboard Lagoonl
12/2/2000
- -
F:TEF-2000
Depopulated
O Yes O No
Freeboard Lagoon2
Overflowed
Q Yes Q O
Freeboard Lagoon3
LQ Issue
Q Yes Q O
PermissionToPump
Q Yes Q No
Freeboard Lagoon4
Inundated
Q Yes Q O
Freeboard Lagoons
Flooded
O Yes Q O
Freeboard Lagoon6
.
Pumping Equipment
Q Yes Q 0
Comments
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................
aSty....................................................................................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................-...................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................

Information contained in this database is from non agency sources and is considered unconfirmed
Farm Emergence Call Form
Farm Number
Farm Name 17704
Owner First Name
Owner Last Name arro S Foods Inc
Q Reporting Q Gompfalnt
Source eS Stutts
Inches
Date 11 -24-2000
Time
Call Number 1649
Plan Due Date Date Plan Date Freeboar
(? equals blank) Received Level OK
Breached
Q Yes © O
Freeboard Lagoonl
11/26/2000
Depopulated
Q Yes 0 O
Freeboard Lagoonl
Overflowed
p Yes O
Freeboard Lagoon3
LQ Issue
Q Yes 0 O
PermissionToPump
Q Yes @) No
Freeboard Lagoon4
Inundated
Q Yes 0 No
Freeboard Lagoons
Flooded
p Yes 0 No
Freeboard Lagoon6
Pumping Equipment
Q Yes 0 No
Comments .. Vl:5QU.1U..LUlA.W..PAaL1................................................................................................................................................
...
.......................................................... .
.TA,T.............................................................................................................................................................................................

02/02/00 WED 16:41 FAA 910 Z70ZODU
9;Al OLL - 5 FOOD5
February 2, 2000
Mr. Jeffery Brown
Division of Water Quality
225 Green Street Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28314
Subject: gapn Hpjghts/ $3" I'� -73-Y
Farms�1f7, %96, 7570, 7078-1, 7704, 7579 805
7706, 7685 7171, 7682, 7572,(L69 7575, 7576, 7578 -
Dear Mr. Brown,
As weather permits we wi;l pump these lagoons down to at least the 19"
mark. To our knowledge, there is no surface water getting to the lagoons. We
have plans to install pressure reducers on these farms. This should cause a
reduction of water usage. Due to excess rainfall and snow, we are ahead on out
lagoons filling for the spring pumping.
If you have any questions, please call me at 910-276-0648 ext. 432.
Sincerely,
Leslie Stutts
Farming and Waste Manager
Laurinburg Division
r

UL/UZIUU ffr.V 10:4U rAS VIU ZYU ZbYU
UkKKULL'S JUUV5 1&001
•
RE:
I
Fax Cover Sheet
RL1:Ce1VLt:D .
FEB 2 2000
Red. �� .
CC:
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Mess
oATE: 2 -Gov u
TIME: 3
TO: �,. w (�C
FAX,.
FROM:
�I�o lis
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

uY/ uL/ uu RLL Ao-. 4z rpL-3� aiv r v 4NOu L/111d\VLL a rvv+.
. f rB 02 ' 00 10: 57AM Cf§a;OLL' S FOODS P . 2/2
r
8. Review CWAW and begin waging on coastal betmuda as
soon as plan; allows (follow all regulations re: runoil).
9_ Obtain required permission from adjacent laadowaer to
spray on designated fields. Amend the CWAW before
any fields not cunv&ly on the CWAW are utilizcd.
✓ I0. Investigate th,e feasibility of installing pressure reducers
an water lines.
Additional practices to be used:
Date-a-a000 {

02/02/00 WED 16:41 FAb 910 276 2590 CAIKKOLL-S FOODS 10003
FEB 02 '00 10:SA;M Cg4ZOLL'S FOODS P.1/2
Division of Water Quality
225 Green Street -Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 29314
S*eet: Plan of Action
Name. [iAI&Zolls sock
Farm Name:
Facility No:
Address.
Phone:_ ;� 76 — 12A 10X� -
Checked below are the items to be carried out on the above farm:
1. Check inside and outside of buildings for water leakage and
water usage.
1/ - 2. Repair and adjust any problems concerning excess water.
—P _ 3. Inspect berms around the lagoon(s) to make sere that
outer is not entering the gstam. Repairs wM be made
where problems are identified.
4. Review flushing and pit recharge schedules. Reduce
flushing and',pit recharges where possible.
✓ S. Closely monitor the soaldng and clean -out of buildings
between herd placements. Reduce time and amount of
water usage as much as possible.
6. Check the moisture levels and crop conditions in all
Way fields_ Utilize appheatians on winter cover crops
according to CWAI" (original or amended).
7. Utilize the 30 day prior to planting prance on these fields
to be planted in row crops.

I.' ,.R 2 7 000
ps iE1 ! FYI! -LPL
pis
March 23. 2000
Mr. Robert-F. Heath
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville; NC 28301-5043
CARROIES FOOD S, NIC.
Box 1767 - 325 McKay Street
Laurinburg, North Carolina 28353
PH:91CV276-0648 FX: 9101276-2950
SUBJECT: Response to letter dated March 17, 2000 regarding freeboard levels.
Dear Mr. Heath:
The following facilities were lowered to or below the required freeboard level as
of March 3, 2000. Facilities 78-27, 78-8, 78-9, 78-10, 78-11, 78-12, 83-8, 83-12, 83-15,
and 83-12.
The following facilities were lowered to or below the required freeboard level as
of March 10, 2000. Facilities 78-28, 78-26, 83-10, and 83-19.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 910-276-0648, ext. 432.
Sincerely,
Carroll's Laurinburg Division
Leslie L. Stutts
Environmental Manager
cc: Mark Pahl

-16f V&f -- nzy 10: J0 raA aiv c (a LOnu
L,AXKULL b rUUDb 10001
.Fax .Covey Sheet
RE:
CC_
DATE: !:�, P - poor)
TIMC:
tl
TO: �q7 . awr- _ ,D W Q
FAX:
FROM:
Its
PHONE. [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Number of pages including cover sheet: ALI
Message:

7ff_ 2 2
J..
February 2, 2000
Mr. Jeffery Brown
Division of Water Quality
225 Green Street Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28314
Subject Lagoon Heights
Farms 7177, 7096, 7570, 7078-1, 7704, 7579, 7805
7706, 7685, 7171, 7682, 7572, 7681, 7575, 7576, 7578
Dear Mr. Brown,
As weather permits we will pump these lagoons down to at least the 19"
mark_ To our knowledge, there is no surface water getting to the lagoons. We
have plans to install pressure reducers on these farms. This should cause a
reduction of water usage. Due to excess rainfall and snow, we are ahead on out
lagoons filling for the spring pumping.
If you have any questions, please call me at 91
Sincerely,
Leslie Stutts
Farming and Waste Manager
Laurinburg Division
R
8 ext. 432.

rr vrr v.. craw �v•av a'nv alv rev r.�ov 411MVLL J 1'VVLJ �]U{i3
4
FEB 02 '00 10:57AM CARROLL'S FOODS
P.I/F
Date: - 2 *,,;Iwo
Division of Water Quality
225 Green Street -Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28314
Subject: plan of Action
Name: C "Izo//s LSD
Farm Name=
Facility No:
Address: .5l�rlAwd
Checked below are the items to be ceaied out on the above farm:
1. Check inside and outside of buildings for water leakage and
water usage.
2. Repair and adjust any problems concerning excess water.
3. Inspect berms around the lwon(s) to make sure that
water is not entering the system. Repairs will be made
where problems are identified.
4. Review flushing and pit recharge schedules_ Reduce
flushing and pit recharges where possible.
✓ 5. Closely monitor the soaking and clean -out of buildings
between herd placements. Reduce time and amount of
water usage as much as possible.
6. Check the moisture levels and crop conditions in all
spray fields. Utilize applications on winter cover crops
according to CWAW (anginal or amended).
7. Utilize the 30 day prior to planting practice on those fields
to be planted in row crops.

FED 02 100 10 57RM CPJMCLL S FOODS P. 2,12
S. Review CWA� and begin spraying on coastal bermuda as
soon as plan allows (follow all regulations re.- runoff}.
9. Obtain required pa mission from adjacent landowner to
spray on designated fields. Am=d the CWAMP before
any fields not currently on the CWAW are utilized.
V/ 10. - Investigate the feasibility of installing pressure reducers
an water lines.
Additional practices to be used:
7A_
Date, .2 -,9, o-laeo