770007_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

v, uei vv nLL io: oo rete riv AID eotsu 1 � lA1eKULL a tVUf14
T
I
'ax.Cover• Sheet
RE:
CC:
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Message:
RATE:
TIME:
T0:_7� — 1�4i1M 1D w Q
FAX:
FROM:
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
l0 001

t
February 2, 2000
Mr. Jeffery Brown
Division of Water Quality
225 Green Street Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28314
Subject: Lagoon Heights
Farms 7177, 7096, 7570, 7078-1, 7704, 7579, 7805
7706, 6S5 7171, 7682, 7572, 7681-, 7575, 7576, 7578
Dear Mr. Brown,
As weather permits we will pump these lagoons down to. at least the 19"
mark. To our knowledge, there is no surface water getting to the lagoons. We
have plans to install pressure .reducers on these farms. This should cause a
reduction of water usage. Due to excess rainfall and snow, we are ahead on out
lagoons filling for the spring pumping.
If you have any questions, please call me at 910-276 0648 ext. 432.
Sincerely,
Leslie Stutts
Farming and Waste Manager
Laurinburg Division
Id

l
�r r�r rr rr..... iv VV •'[iil p,LV i, V iV OV
FEB 02 100 10157AM CARROLL'S FOODS
Date: ,Q • V *ajwd _
Division of water Quality
225 Green Street -Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28314
Subject: Plan of Action
Name: c x g/lo//s -�6
�,nnnvi.i. o ruwa
Farm Name:
Facility No: .
Address: .-51w P,d
Phone:
Checked below are the items to be carried out an the above Tann:
P.1/2
____ ✓ 1. Check inside and outside of buildings for water leakage and
water usage.
2, Repair and adjust any problems concerning excess water.
3. Inspect berms around the lagoon(s) to milk e sure that
water is not entering the system. Repairs will be made
where problems are identified.
4. Review flushing and pit recharge schedules. Reduce
flushing and pit recharges where possible.
1/ 5. Closely monitor the soaking and clean-out of buildings
between herd placements. Reduce time and amount of
water usage as much as posraMe.
6. Check the moistwe levels and drop conditions in all
spray fields. Utilize applications on winter cover crops
according to CWAhT (original or amended).
7. Utilize the 30 day prior to planting practice on those fields
to be pleated in row crops.
to UO3

FEB 02 100 10:57AM CARROLL'S FOODS
P.2/2
S. Review CWAW and begin spraying on coastal bermuda as
soon as plan allows (follow all regulations re: runoff).
9. Obtain required permission from adjacent landowner to
spray on designated fields. Amend the CWAW before
any fields not currently on- the CWAW are utilized,
1� 10. Investigate the feasibility of installing pressure .reducers
on water lines. =
Additional practices to be used:
signatut
Date

4�v
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 14, 1999
Carroll's Foods, Inc.
Attn.: Leslie Stutts
P.O. Box 1767
Laurinburg, NC 28353
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Permit No. AWS 770007
Farm # 7685
Facility No. 77 - 7
Richmond County
Dear Mr. Stutts:
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non discharge
permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H
.0217, you have been found to be in violation of your 2H .0217 Permit.
On May 14, 1999, the Division of Water Quality at the Fayetteville Regional
Office inspected the Carroll's Food Farm #7685 swine facility. Small grain
overseed was planted for winter application of wastewater. However, small grain
overseed is not a crop specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP). The CAWMP was revised in December 1998 to include matua grass
overseed in field #3, but the field consisted mostly of oats that had been allowed
to seed out. A review of the irrigation records indicated that the records were
calculated based on one waste analysis. However, waste samples appeared to
have been taken at the appropriate times.
A review of the freeboard records indicated that the lagoon level had reached
a level higher than the required freeboard of 19 inches. General Permit condition
III.6.e states that "the Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate
Regional Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following
the first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following events: (e) Failure
to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater than or equal to that
required in Condition V(3) of this General Permit.". -
226 GREEN 8TRISKY, SUITE. 714, FAY[TTCVFLLE, NORTH CAROLINA 2830 1-804 8
PHONE [phone] FAX PIO-486-0707
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /APRIRMATIYE ACTION EMPLOYER - 60% RECYCLE0/10% POET -CONSUMER PAPER

A, q, ' h
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following items be addressed:
1. Consult with a technical specialist in order to revise the CAWMP to accurately reflect the crops
that are to be grown for waste application.
2. Identify and correct the problem associated with entering the irrigation records so that the actual
Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) is reflected in order to prevent over application.
3. Adhere to all of the General Permit conditions.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility's General Permit being
revoked and being required to obtain an individual non -discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the Division of
Water Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $10,000.00 per day per
violation.
Please provide a written response to this office on or before July 2, 1999, regarding corrective
actions taken or planned. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate
to contact either Mr. Jeffery Brown, Environmental Engineer, or myself at [phone].
Sincerely,
aul E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Sonya Avant - Compliance Group
Vilma Marra - Richmond Co. NRCS
Audrey Oxendine - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files - Raleigh

AMR
h -CDENR
L y S y' Y7 7 Y,
JAMES a.HUNTJR:
GOVERNOR;
�.�y�•" :ir„�: � :tit•
WAYNE MCDEVITt 4t
SECRETARY �• �,Kti'' •.. ��
c r `10ERR T STIZVLNf'
tl��•'�f' 'iiRY'i nw,r
16
S. •.� +e '+' _�•tl 'r/mar. t}l•n� rt'
• IIs° �.`•� � r r �3
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 18, 1999
Carroll's Foods, Inc.
Attn.: Leslie Stutts
P.O. Box 1767
Laurinburg, NC 28353
SUBJECT: EXPLANATION OF VIOLATIONS
Farms 7768, 7685, 7573, 7574, & 7171
Dear Mr. Stuffs:
This letter is in regards to the letter you sent addressed to me on June 28,
1999, regarding the Notice of Violations that the above farms received following
inspections by our Division. First of all, I would like to take the time to clarify
a few items:
1. I fully understand that an irrigation pump is designed in such a manner that the
packing is cooled by the dripping of wastewater. However, it was evident that the
irrigation pump on Farm 7768 was not working properly at the time of the site
visit. Wastewater was leaking at a steady rate causing substantial ponding on the
lagoon dike. Although I did not actually observe the pump in operation at Farm
7171, there was evidence to indicate that the same problem was occurring on this
facility.
2. The General Permit clearly states that the CAWMP shall be readily available
at the farm, not the main office.
3. It is our responsibility as inspectors to evaluate the waste application fields to
determine if the correct cropping patterns are in place as specified in the
CAWMP. If the present crop, whether it was planted or simply volunteered, is
different from that which is specified in the CAWMP, then the facility is not in
compliance with the CAWMP.
P.O. 0011 29535, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0530
PNONE 919.733.7015 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RKCYCLED/1013 POET -CONSUMER PAPER

r ,�
Page 2
Carroll's Foods, Inc.
August 18, 1999
In response to your question, anything that is a violation of the CAWMP or the General Permit is
considered to be a violation. Therefore, anything that would be noted on an inspection form is
technically considered a violation of either the CAWVIP or the General Permit. However, it will
always be left to the discretion of the inspector as to what letter (NOD or NOV), if any, is issued to
a facility. We as inspectors are looking more closely at facilities to see if all conditions of the
General Permit are being followed. Certain conditions in the General Permit are more important
than others, however the facility has. to abide by all permit conditions. The requirement to report any
of the emergency items outlined in section 6 of the General Permit should always be considered
some of the most important conditions.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call Jeffery Brown,
at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jeffery Brown
Environmental Engineer
v
SENDER:
1 also wish to receive the follow`
in
0
❑ Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services.
Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b.
ing services (for an extra fee):
m❑
Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this
.I
'
m
card to you.
❑ Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space'does not
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
CD
r
permit.
O Write 'Return Receipt Requested' on the mailpiece below the article number.
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
c
❑ The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
0
delivered.
m
3. Article Addressed to:
4a. Article Number
o
P 154.616 996
Leslie Stutts
4b. Service Type
{ to
Carroll's : Foods .Inc
❑ Registered certified
w
PO BOX 1767
❑ Express Mail ❑insured
oLaurinburg
NC 28353
❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD
7. Date of Delivery
f-
5. ReCelvpd By: (Print Name)
8. Addressee's Address ( y i/ requested and
lee is paid)
c
6. Igna re (Addressee or Agent)
PS Form 3811, December 1994
102595-99-13-0223 Domestic Return Receipt
m
U
2
d
N
AL
0
u
m
¢
F
d
¢
Im
c
y
0
`0
0
0
T
.Y
c
m
r~

June 28, 1999
Jeffrey Brown
Environmental Engineer
NC Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
RECEIVED
I. U L 6 - 1999
FAYE17EVILLE
REG. C::FICE
CARROWS FOOD S, INC.
Box 1767 - 325 McKay Street
Laurinburg, North Carolina 28353
PH: 910/276.0648 FX:910R76-2M
SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO VIOLATIONS
Farms 7768, 7685, 7573
7574, and 7171
Dear Mr. Brown,
Farm 7768, 83-17, has a waste management plan to spray on cotton which is only two
hydrants. The rest of the farm is coastal and overseed. The lagoon dike vegetation will be
repaired by seeding common Bermuda and millet this summer. The drainage of the low spot can
be repaired at this time also. We maintain the records for the farms in our main office. Mr.
Oxendine picked up an older plan without realizing we had the revisions in place.
Since your visit we have made the call when our lagoon was at the top pipe. I hope in the
future we won't have to make this call at all. We do check our equipment before, during, and,
after application. They are supposed to leaf: some to cool the packing.
Farm 7685, 77-7, was planted in Matua and was checked and verified by our area
extension agent who also did our revision to the plan in December. The problem we had with
entering the records has been corrected. It was doubling the hours on the hydrants.
Farm 7573, 83-6, the lagoon has been mowed as close as possible without tearing up our
equipment. We will contact the farm manager and let them know about the syringes and the
bottles. The waste analysis was updated March 1, 1999 with very little change on all of the
farms in this division. The field that was in preparation to be planted was planted and we are
trying to keep it mowed to slow the competition to get a stand. We hope to not have to call about
a lagoon height in the future, but should it happen, we will follow procedures.

Farm 7171, 83-19, since your visit we have mowed and bulldozed any trees to close to
the toe of the lagoon plus we have fixed any washes on the lagoon dike. We have sprigged the
field in front and are keeping it mowed to allow the spriggs to take hold. We updated the waste
analysis on March 1, 1999 and have since taken more samples. We will monitor our equipment
during operation more closely.
Farm 7574, 83-7, when we finish the farm we are on right now, we will repair the bare
spots and vegetation on the lagoon dike. We changed the waste analysis on March 1,1999 and
have since taken more samples.
Thank you for helping point out the areas we need to improve on. I have a question and
would appreciate a response. What tipped over the scales to go from a deficiency to a violation?
A lot of the items found seemed to have carried more weight than in the past.
If you have any further questions or concerns, please contact me at 910-276-2172 ext.
432.
Sincerely,
Leslie Stutts
Farming and Waste Manager
Laurinburg Division

Division of Soil and eW ater,Consearvation'Operation Review] '�' " ��0
t
Division of Soil and Water Conserwitioii Coiiuphance Inspection t ��
t /-
u ivisio; of Water'Quiliq gCompliance Inspection
A67
12 Other Agency Operattati:ReweWv�'
Routine O Com laint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow -u of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection -T
Time of Inspeetion 1 10,' a 124 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted Certified E3 Conditionally Certified © Registered 0 Not Opera=
Date Last Operated:
# %85 .........................
Farm Name .... Connty:.............LfT ....1,., .......................
jIrM...................................................
jj
0
Owner Name:..........09..rro./N a'/..: Aip Phone No: .71.7.047-%0449 .........................
1
Facility Contact: .......... Le,5. .1CS57`:7k .............................. Title. Phone No
Mailing Address: ......... P. ...... 1r4!�......39
g'............ Itr!-�.�� �ll.....
ti
Onsite Representative :.............Integrator:
t}� QjC e... �!T ...................
...•.?�
..........r...r.
Certified Operator:... ................................................ ........ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
A
........................................... I ........... I.................................................................. ... .... ... ... 1
Latitude Longitude �• �� ���
Design Current,Design Current �'�
Swine i I,F1 ��r, r �Ca acit Po ulation Poultry; tea '� i.Ca acct ' .Pci elation" Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Population F'
i; , tt
" t ❑ Wean to Feeder '., ❑ Layer'-' ❑ Dairy
,Ca
,r l:
I V7.
j El Feeder to Finish a`] Non -Layer❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
o�
❑ Gilts 3
❑ Boars Total SSLW
'
Subsurface Drains Present ea ❑ Spray Field Arca
N'umber,of Lagoons;❑ ❑ f.agoon Ar
0
Holdin �Pands I Sohd Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste M .
g. anagcment System
Discharges & Stream Impacts,
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes KNO
Discharge originatedat. ❑Lagoon ❑SprayField ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was tate conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes gNo
c. li' discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
LVIA
T T 7
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system`. (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes 9 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes XNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes j(No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes jJ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure
5 Structure h
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches) . ...............6..r`............................................. ...... ..................... ......... ................................... ...................................
...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
[].Yes No
seepage, etc.)
3123199
Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
❑ No
❑ Yes
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑ Yes
A
closure plan?
❑ Yes
PfNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
( No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
P
I L Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive P ndingAN �
WYes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?Yes
E]No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
9No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
( Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
0 No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ief irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, f eeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0;bio yiol'p i9ris ;0 0 1 cies W wore nOtpd. 00tring •tills'visit, • y0 j) will •tee�iye no futft
COrrCShOn(�ence. a�lYut. this .visit. . . . . . . . . : : . . . . . . : ...
. . . . . . . . . . . .
❑ Yes KNo
El Yes o
r— _(' 13
ElYes No
❑ Yes KNo
"Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
9No
❑ Yes
A
Yes
❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: " _ +ems,
3123199
b

22
r;
Facility Number:
]late of inspection
I -K- Aled -&- jL comp W-JU
7125197

Revised April 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: 675 acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: Operation not required to secure WA
' g determination at this time based on
Date of site visit: 5- �¢� %/ exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP: .3 -- - % I Operation pended for wettable apAq
determination based on P1 CSW P3
Annual farm PAN deficit: _S,110 pounds '
Irrigation System(s) - circle #� 1 and -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART I. WX Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part II, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D)D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farmsthat_fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II F1 F2 F3`; before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART IL 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination requiredbecause. operation fails -one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:. .
F1 Lack of acreage which -resulted in over application -of wastewater (PAN) on-spray-
field(s) according to,farm's.last two years -of irrigation -records:::.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack.of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous:ditches;_failure to.deduct-required :i.
buffer/setback acreage; -or. 25% of total acreage. identified in CAWMP-includes:7:
small,- irregularlyshaped fields--- fields less than-5°acresfor.travelers:onless.than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in'excess
of 75% of the respective fields total acreage as noted in table in Part Ill. °

Facility Number p Date of Inspections
Time of inspection � cSU 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Q Registered W Certified Q Applied for Permit ❑ Permitted JQNotOeerational Date Last Operated:
FarmName:..... �... ---- 7.7.4..,1.. ...... ............................................ County:..........e f..!... ..b.? ........................................
Owner Name:....4�..�i r �..l.�..tS....... �' 1. ... � r Ylf�°.r i . ............. Phone No......... z. ......6.1P. ....................................
Facility Contact:... L19.5. ......... :s. h .......................... Title:............ ;1..L:.................... Phone No:......2%G...~ p .. Li.........
Mailing Address; ..... f....v.. .% �i I�.......Q.' �1.............................................. ..........� A�' .a. ..�,..... .��.................... z�3.g ....
Onsite Representative:...(r..' .......S u.?r-•......................................................... Integrator: ........... L..Gz.r.lC':?..1.1.. ...... S.9d5:...........
Certified Operator:............................................................................................................ ... Operator Certification Number.
Location of Farm:
0.1% ..... e....... X..... ... ;k ...... +.. ....01.1 rr........4071.......d.......�.....................................
lix ............................ �►
...:.R-/,YptJ.. sees ...:..1 ...............l....,. .. .e
Latitude =G=,=11 Longitude =' 0` ="
o-
Design Current
Design Current
Delia Current
Swine a
Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Popuiation
❑Wean to Feeder
ElLayer
I J [] Dairy
❑ No
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Yes
11 Non -Layer
❑ Nan_ Dairy
Farrow to Wean
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Other''
77
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Yes
No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ YesNo
❑ Farrow to Finish
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonstholding ponds) require
❑ Yes
Total Design Capacity
0
❑ Gilts'
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yesro
[I Boars
❑ Yeso
Total''SSLW
Continued
on back
v E�;
Number of, Lagoons / Hpldtng Ponds
.r❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area'
A '
:a
❑ . W
No Liquid este Management System
, ,
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
qNo
2. Is any discharge observer/ from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ YesNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonstholding ponds) require
❑ Yes
No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yesro
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yeso
7/25/97
Continued
on back

. 1
Facility Number:
8, Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes [� No
Structures (Lagoons,11oldingPonds, Flush ['its, etc.) / ►
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes )(No
Stn►cture I Structure 2 Structure 3' Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft); ............3 ............................................
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes �No
1 L Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes V1 No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes j No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate puhlic health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes *To
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff ente • g waters of he State, notify DWQ) G
15. Crop type ....... !�f'1'yA.W ........... ......... 1� ...... ...............................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with hose design ted in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ANO
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes gtNo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? IwYes ❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes KNo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 01No
21. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes KNo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes )E�No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ,IVNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes gNo
0 No'violations°ar. de'ficieiicies�wer'e noted. during this, visit:.Yoo.will receive-no-ftirther;::
correspnndekc About this•.yisK.,
See w�e�s a- ld �. 0�5 �. Apr q y,� '�jd s n P� CX41 P14 6-
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: y Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Carroll's Realty Partnership
7685,
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear Carroll's Realty Partnership:
1 " •
NC'DENR
NoFrrr+ W_ ��tiOF
ENVIRONM TE*!lOIU p
June 26, 1998 9...�d6d�/
,1111. 2 3 1998
FAYETTEVILLE
[SEG. OFFICE
Subject: Reissuance of Certificate of Coverage
No.AWS770007
7685
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and
Application System
Richmond County
The Division.of Water Quality modified the Swine Waste Operation General Permit originally issued to
this facility on July 28, 1997. In accordance with the issuance of the revised General Permit, we are
forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Carroll's Realty Partnership, authorizing the operation
of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but
not limited to, the management of animal waste from the 7685, located in Richmond County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 2400 Farrow to Wean and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003, and shall hereby void
COC No AWS770007 dated July 28, 1997. The COC shall hereby incorporate by reference any specific
conditions of the previous COC issued to this facility.. The purpose of this COC is to allow coverage
under the revised General Permit. PIease review the revised General Permit (enclosed) and pay
particular attention to Condition II. 10 regarding tree removal from lagoon embankments, Condition III.1
regarding inspection frequency. of the waste treatment, storage and collection'system and Condition II1.6
regarding notification requirements for system failures, spills and emergencies. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required'to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer' 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS770007
7685
Page 2
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts; requirements', or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an ,individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this p"rocess i Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is, located in the Fayetteville Regional Office.. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact Katharine Keaton at [phone] ext. 533.
Sincerely,
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Richmond County Health Department
Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Richmond County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

e
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan' B. Howes, Secretary.
A. -Preston Howard, Jr., P. -E., Director
TIFIED
Carroll's Realty Partnership
7709'
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw NC 28398
Farm Number: 77-7
Dear Carroll's Realty Partnership:
IF T
E:)EHNR
June 11, 1997 RECEIVE%
0 1991
FAYETTEVILLE
REG. � _ DQE
You are hereby notified that 7709, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has thir 0
dM to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with
Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date.
Your application must be returned within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the
application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for
each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package. The
signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location map, and
two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the application
package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any question concerning this letter, please call John Jallah at [phone] extension
364 or Ed Buchan with the Fayetteville Regional Office at [phone]
Sinc ely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Fayetteville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

. - --....__._-_.-.
Farm Status: �� * cd
n
'Farm Name: '' County:..�.......� .........,...........
Owner Name: L,4Q,P� �s Lloe'5_ =LIL PhoneNo:
Mailing Address: �� �� .�'"� �Qu�i.✓(��Y��
Onsite Representative: E1' :.%` ,..�,�.. Integrator:
Cerfltied Operator: _....�,,,i,.1_M��r Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude i....J+�` r " Longitude
© Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
3'y SZ'x ?s,DK •`.s' .�: y8"£�'' �,.''Yi v� ¢.i`��'' ,a fE�,'y Y� a h��f *r" :2 s +: ` �� x'r+'>�a °.a..„#'�''
t x Numbers poll�try £�,NuAlb�r^ : i"At1�ek nKltfil�ier M
Wean to Feeder 4 ,ID Layer 10 Dairy`
Feeder to Finish 0 ❑Non -Layer ❑ BeefAM
X.4
sITOwto Wean T"tk�
eedC
arrow O kyx x xwr r°q Ar 3 C b e ���� Pon + HBe we
v ”
Fa w to Finish 3 ❑Other Type of Livestock �,,
�k yds,
�S`7 "�?a a *,a*,2;s`a ,
, K e
Number of Lagoons !Holding Ponds / ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
r �k# y ❑Lagoon AresS ray Field Area
ee
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
�TNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
® No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
P No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a Iagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
Q No
3, Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
m No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than Iagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
((No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
❑Yes No '
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in p responsible charge (if inspection after 1/l/97)?
❑.Yes kNo
. 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds.on site which need to be properly closed?
Yes N No -
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? -
❑ Yes Kallo
-Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon I') Lagoon 3
Lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the- structures?.
❑ Yes ` [ No
11. Is erosion, or any.other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
.
❑ Yes gNo
12. Do any, of the structures need maintenaacerunprovement? =
❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,;and the situation poses an
immediate public health -or. environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
�
❑ Yes kNo
Waste Aoti)ication � � -
,-
14. Is then; physical evidence of over application?
in
,❑ YesNo
(If excess of-WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify.DWQ)
.
15- Crop type r......�:..,.,1._ -
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal. Waste Management Plan?
Yes J4 No.
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes &TNo
18. Does the cover crop need' improvement?
YesNo
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
0 Yes kNo
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to ,have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? .
❑ Yes --R No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal .Waste Management Plan in any way?
- yes �.No
22. Does record'keeping need improvement?
'
.
Yes .�kNo
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
-
Yes No .
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss. reviewhpspection with owner or operator in charge?
arge.
❑ Yes. EVNo
Reviewer/inspector Name's.""" ;:> :.,;na-x...,..;z•-
§ y
Reviwer/Inspector Signature:,)'-`�
Dater

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Don P. Butler
7709
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear Don P. Butler:
CQrrvII rr
LT!?FA
�EHNR
RE. VEU
July 28, 1997
JUL 2 9 1997
FAYETTEVILE
REG. OPFiC.
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS770007
7709
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Richmond County
In accordance with your application received on July 14, 1997, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) to Farm No. 77-7, authorizing the operation of an animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with the State's General Permit (attached). This
approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management ,of
animal waste from the 7709 Farm, located in Richmond County, with an animal capacity of no greater than
2400 Farrow to Wean and the application to a minimum of 50 acres of land as specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2001. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of
wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data
and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater
than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. 'A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 500/c recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at (919) 73375083 ext. 363.
Sincerely,
__IZA. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Richmond County Health Department
Fray,eYte-ville:Regional:Office;NV-aterLQuality-Secb'&r-r
Richmond County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.B., Director
Mr. Leslie Stutts
Carroll's Foods, Inc.
325 McKay Street
Laurinburg, NC 28352
Dear Mr. Stutts:
?WA
A4
±9;lk
E3EEHNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY J 1991
March 24, 1997 FW a7rf[-V i LLE
REG. OFFICE
SUBJECT: Annual Compliance Inspection
Carroll's Foods, Inc.
Farm No. 7709
Registration No. 77-7
Richmond County
On March 19, 1997, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality inspected the subject swine facility. Please find enclosed a copy of our Compliance
Inspection Report for your information. It is the opinion of this office based on the
information provided and observations made during the inspection that the facility was in
compliance with 15A NCAC 2H, Part.0217 at the time of the inspection. Please refer to the
comments section on the rear of the inspection form for information regarding your facility.
Please be aware that all swine facilities with a liquid waste collection system designed for
a minimum of 250 hogs must have a certified waste management plan on or before December
31, 1997.
The district MRCS office, Agriculture Extension office, or the Division of Soil and Water
have specialist available to assist you with upgrading of existing facilities and certification.
-
P.O. Box 29535,
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 �, An Equal Opportunity/Afflrmcrlive Action Employer
NTelephone 919-733-7015 50% recycles/ 10% post -consumer paper

odtine O Complaint O Follow-uof DWQ Ins action O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Fadlity Num Date of Inspection
Time of inspection O : f use U br. time
Farm Stafne:
—a i'61Total Time (in boon) Spent onReview
or Inspection (Includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: w Z?,�(Z.
Owner Name~: s fp�P•_ .w,..,�...
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: _:+ Kb, s� s
Certified Operator. /
Location of Farm: �,� _ 7V
Countr il. e rw�w r .�wrww�
Phone No: ��„�Z�3 - 3 97Y ,...r
Operator Certification Number: 1
Latitude LongitudeILU r, 11.11Z LU
113 Not Operational Date Last Operated:���n 0
Type of Operation and Design Capacity ,`�� 0-
of Livedock
7
Subsurface Drains
Lagoon Area, 11'I
3. Are theca any buffers that need aWateaaned�rovemeat?
Z. L any diacharge observed from nay part of the operation?
L If disci msgc is observed, was the conveyance moa-au:da?
b. If ditchargo is observe4 did it reach Swface WaW (If yes, notify► DWQ)
C4 If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d Does d=harge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is then evidence of past discharge Dom any part of the operation?
a. Was there nay adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than fiom a di dwp?
S. Does may part of the waste management system (other than lagoomA olding ponds) require
' meiateoance/rmplovtnmeat?
E3 Yes
�TNo
Mes
®No
C) Yes
© No
[3 Yes
§0 No
Q Yes
Q No
[3 Yes
m No
0 Yes
VI No
O Yes
I(No

_--i
6. Is iacility not in compliance with any applicable adback criteria? _
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/'1/-
B. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
tructures fLaaoons and/or Hold1pj Pondsl
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): �n 1 Lagoon'2 Lagoon 3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ,
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste ADolication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. crop type —dAxlr _ '
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
IS. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plea readily available?
21. Does the facility -fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewar,%sp--car &a to discuss revfewridspection with owner or operator in charge?
D Yes kNO .
D Yes 4No
13Yes A No
❑ Yes 0 No
Lagoon 4
Yes 10No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes tqNo-
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes O(No
❑ Yes R No
XYes NNo_
❑ Yes tkNo
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes E(No
G!/,EeSF.F.� dr/i� OC!?s /L�jc�,F�/.E,��• /UOV /�/��An! AS �l.F�//.Elr/G�
Reviewer/Inspector Name 7�+�'•:ti".'n. .d•n"`:...`./ef:w�'...:SC.rt-....g3pS'i=�•fel' ,
Reviwer/Inspector Signature:
Date: MPA"

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources &76ja Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E:HNF;Z
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
July 25, 1996
Carroll's Foods, Inc.
1 l6 James Street
Laurinburg, NC 28352
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Swine Farms
Hoke, Scotland and Richmond Counties
Dear Sir;
On July 2, 1996, an inspection of several animal operations was performed by the
Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). Please find enclosed a copy of our Compliance Inspection
Report for your information. It is the opinion of this office that these facilities are in compliance
with 15A NCAC 2H, Part.0217, and that Animal Waste Management is being properly performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact me at (910) 486-
1541 ext. 325.
Sincerely,
Ricky Revels
Environmental Technician IV
Enclosure
cc: Facility Compliance Group
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville�y. FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 Nif CAn Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

J Facility Number: / l - y t
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: 7/oz/94
Time: 0 S 0 0
Srgneral Information:
Farm Name: Cavvolt'S Foods , Twc. 0*7709) County:_ R;CJ•w4"rv'A .,
Owner Name: Cour.•* it's R 4 a`1tti Phone No: (910) z y 3.3X3 4
On Site Representative: A ! Lan, Integrator: Co v" I1 's Ea ask z
Mailing Address: o g G
NC. 7_131E
Physical Address/Location: 4,-44 • 3'91 . 4nvw< <.c- N to r S R 11r07_
Latitude: 1 1 Longitude: 1 1
Q erationpescidption: (based on design characteristics)
Tyye� of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Catrle No. of Animals
a'Sow -?-!:E 0 w .aa N O Layer O Dairy
❑ Nursery O Non -Layer O Beef
❑ Feeder
Othe:DTe of Livestock Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: S (include in the Dmwvinp and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility IMection;
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than I -foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
3 Yes ❑
No C9�
Is seepage observed from the. lagoon?:
Yes ❑
Noe
Is erosion observed?:
Yes ❑
No
Is any discharge observed?
Yes ❑
No C�
❑ Man-made Q Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Yes ❑
No a--,'
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
Yes ❑
No B'
{ lirt the crops which need improvement)
Crop type:__ $c,•►u -..d., 1 o,.j d_ Acreage:
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application? Yes ❑ No C
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application? Yes ❑ No
Is animal waste stockpiled within IDO feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes ❑ No 3'
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream? Yes ❑ No I'
AOI - January 17,199% ,

Maintenance _ z;
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes ❑ No
Is there evidence of past' discharge from any part of the operation?
Yes ❑ No 300'
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes ❑ No
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? Yes ❑ No C�
.Explain any Yes answers:'
Cev+. " NOOO i�,8
Signature:
Date:- 7/0 z / 9 4
cc. Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed
Drawings or Observations-
0
AOI,— .January 17,1"6

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan.B. Howes, Secretary
Carroll's Realty Partnership
7709
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw NC 28398
November 12, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Carroll's Realty Partnership 7709
Facility ID#: 77-7
Richmond County
Dear Farm Owner:
MECEIVED
NOV 12 1996
FAYMEVILLE
RFG. OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.4224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on-going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 9191733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. ZPr4eson/H_ow­ard, Jr., P.F _DFector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687,N%ICAn
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50°% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Information contained in this database is from non agency sources and is considered unconfirmed
Earm Emergency Call Form
Farm Number 1
Farm Name 17685
Owner First Name
Owner Last Name arro S ea y a vers ip
p Reporting Q Complaint
Source ILes Stutts
Inches
Date 11 -31-2000
Time
Call Number 1929
Plan Due Date Date Plan - Date Freeboar
(? equals blank) Received Level OK
Breached
10 es O O
Freeboard Lagoonl
12-2-2000 7]F-18-2000
-
Depopulat
Depopulated
O Yes O No
Freeboard Lagoonl
Overflowed
O eSp 0
Freeboard Lagoan3
F
LO Issue
Q e5 Q No
PermisslonToPump
10 Yes 0 No
Freeboard Lagoon4
Inundated
O Yes Q
Freeboard Lagoons
Flooded
Q Yes O 0
Freeboard Lagoon6
Pumping Equipment
10 Yes 0=
Comments
.............................................
mh; .sty ..........................

• �• �� �_� a. �v J�iJL ViV ... .VVV WJVU1
DATE- D(Jfi
. TIME: �• (/
TO:
:t
FAX;
Fax Cover Sheet
FROM:
C94&2o /ls
Rece/VLZDPHONE: 9101276-0648
Fes ;.21�p FAX: [phone]
CC: '
r•
Number of pages including cover sheet: __ __

tt Vi/ Vi, v 11"1/ 1V 41 i� ViV it V iVVV
�`� FES 02 '00 10:S7RM CARROLL'S FOODS
Date: -,,0 - j2 -fid
Division of Water Quality
225 Omen Street -Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 38314
Subject: Plan of Action
Name: C 49ila�/s -4a
WZ%X%X%W"" V VWWW 7
Farm Name:
Facility No:
Address: 5&m6.6nd
Phone: L2 7,4 " &6 4rk
P.1/2
Checked below ars the items to be carried out on the above farm:
1. Check inside and outside of buildings for water leakage and
water usage.
2. Repair and adjust any problems concerning excess water.
3. Iuspect berms around the lagoon(s) to make sure that
water is not entwing the system. Repain will be made
where problems are identified.
4. Review flushing and pit recharge schedules. Reduce
flushing andpit recharges when possible.
y/ S. Closely monitor the soaking and clean-out of buildings
between herd placements. Reduce time and amount of
water usage as much as possible.
6. Check the moisture levels and crop conditions in all
spiny fields.' Utilize applications on winter cover crops
according to CWAW (original or amended).
7. Utilize the 30 day prior to planting practice on those fields
to be planted in row crops.
91W VVV

vciuAiuu ULU 10:41 rAA Ulu L/0 LaUu l.A"ULL a ruuLa tgjUUZ
o
February 2, 2000
Mr. Jeffery Brown
Division of Water. Quality
225 Green Street Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 2831.4
Subject: L,#gopn Hpjghtsf 83`i' as
Farms 7177, �096, 7570, 7078-1, 7704, 7579 805
7706, 7685 7171, 7682, 7572, 68 , 7575, 7576; 7578 �s-
-
Dear -Mr. Brown,
As weather permits we wi;l pump thes&lagoons down to at least the 19"
mark.. To our knowledge, there is no surface water getting to the lagoons. We
have plans to install pressure reducers on these farms. This should cause a
reduction of water usage. Due to excess rainfall and snow, we are ahead on out
lagoons filling for the spring pumping.
If you have any questions-, please call me at 910-276-0648 ext. 432.
Sincerely,
Cy
Leslie Stuffs
Farming and Waste Manager
Laurinburg Division
2

Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address:_
Site Requires Immediate Attention: NO
Facility No. 77 -7_
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: M&ky 14 , 1995
Time: 09 : 30
roll `S N D. '7101c
CO rro // `s hood -ZNC. .
e /VC ZS
-County: R1 CA MOVd
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone: C'9/o-) 59Z - 7-&97
Physical Address/Location: SR ! S oZ east of �f_ 3W 4o,6rara G; b sa n!
Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: z*oD ocar-w►ecur Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude:3-4 35 " Longitude: 79 ° 38'55"
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon h
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) (
Was any seepage observed from the
Is adequate land available for spray?
Crop(s) being utilized: ,Bev-igw
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellin IUie No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or N&
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes 00
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or -other
similar man-made devices? Yes o No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)?Ye or No
Additional Comments:_ Ccv+,-fi C-ci Far - i iJ -%
sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
or No Actual Freeboard: 3 Ft. & Inches
on(s)? Yes or®o Was any erosion observed? Yes or
Por No Is the cover crop adequate? (yDor No
RC, X�) Re,Jc� S
Inspector Name
Signature -.._.�
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

FHB 0z '�0 10:57AM CARROLL'S FOODS; P.22
8, Review CWAW and be spraying on coastal, becniiuda as •
soon as plank allows (follow all, regulations re: runoM.
9. Obtain required pet m ission from adjacent landowner to
spray on designated fields. Amendthe WANTbeffire
any fields not currently on the CWA1 V are utilized.
10. Investigate di c feasibiity of iustall_in_ g pressure reducem
on water. lines.
Additional practices to be used:

021 P02
- DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
November 4, 1994
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
jj�� II County
ItfLh�
Dear :
9 ' 3 0 q;ki
On , , an inspection of your animal operation was performed by the
Fayetteville Regional Office (MO), Please find enclosed a copy of our
Compliance Inspection Report for your information. It is the opinion of this
office that this facility is in compliance with 15A NCAC 2x, Part .0217, and
that Animal Waste Management is being properly performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact
me at [phone].
Enclosure
cc: facility Compliance Group
Sincerely,

101 00 100 00:00
021 P03
NORTH CAROLINA DRPARTlOWT OF M1VIRO VMM, IOMTH & NATURAL RBSOURMS
DIVISION OF IIHVI MG=TAL RANAGEKENT
Fayetteville Regional Office
Animal Operation Compliance Inspection Farm
!MMIY1.%xd•.MIYF;�. .a � aM .�. y**�t�y.%pt ., ,.,vr.v,r.v..v. i�Y'.K.%.i«v,4<•<.r..AnIA.N.v..RvgpY,.<..,vwv•,v,V.. .�.. ,..
NCr I ir141.[i.vl .,,�lk� ktl:W*MFMVt�' # �ifµ�W% •hY �Y[II:f4KM�/Y44MMYiJIJ1%1t�14':4id�Ii �W%Y%•%K�%Y[<4�<IF' IiM�y<:ti,IN•/id>%.V.K �IrI+h�[i4�••w.•[. :n:..}.. .4.
wYw ww.w�NNwNwl.v[.�5wiN�kV4" .• .... v '�[ •W[M K� ;hlw' Nl.••..:+r{e
�. �j/�.��' J<y�.)[ ��py;,> 4 ���/}�M
•.Yw.Y.Y.[�.Y.K.YIi. WFNY[I .dt� n< N�
`x!Y` �M�l.�.��r.%: .C�T.�.rt{i...��Ifi��i��i�+a:�
%..:.i'
Iti:V:w:.:+�;i:xn «i.• +wy:;+iii•iv:i>.i<•�v.i."�i.,[K:•iwi•�"r �aifw<e�Jaiv {W� [� W� x�CMvi��i,�i<.iwini�i�l�.is�iiii',i::.yi�::w.:�i::V'�:'�::i iiiini:�i�vii�ii•v�li.'�
M^5410 pI4iF 1�AM i'Swt�•AYi �•+I.ri•1i RI'�%t
[Y' '. Y. � % .MI4M14W%•KK WW •%Ik•Y�*MV;k Z(�I.• KMv y.rl..i�.wYl.vwv.Vn
A•A•r nWM
yyy y�r.yyy�y��yj]`]
���iwiSl«•lyl-0r?�� MYip 9i•viv
W1 M�
�{ >� %yy y�,yv
�M%.#new r[.KUFM�MIw•HY.�. nw�.Fv.
14 M
All questions answered negatively will be discussed in sufficient detail in
the Comments Section to enable the deemed Permittee to perform the appropriate
corrections:
j=;ON I
Animal. _operaUgn xvrce:
Horses, cattle, swine poultry, or sheep
1. Does the number and type of animal meet or exceed
the (.0217) criteria? ICattle (100 head),
horses (75), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and
poultry (30,000 birds with liquid waste
system)]
2. Roes this facility meet criteria for
Animal Operation IMISTUTiON?
3. Are animals confined fed or maintained
in this facility for a 12 -month period?
4. goes this facility have a CERTrFUM ,ANIMAL
Nam NANAGEMENT.[[2 ?
5. Does this facility maintain waste management
records (volumes of manure; land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with
specific cover crop)?
6. Does this facility meet the SCS minimum
setback criteria for neighboring houses,
Wells, etc?

101 00 100 00:00
' a
III
Field _8ite_ Management
1. Is animal waste stockpiled or lagoon
construction within 100 ft. of a USGS
Map Blue bine Stream?
2. Is animal waste land applied or spray
irrigated within 25 ft. of a USG5 Hap
Blue Line Stream?
3. Does this facility have adequate acreage
on which to apply the waste?
4. Does the land application site have a
cover crop in accordance with the
CffitTIFZMXON P�.1►N?
5. Is animal waste discharged into waters of
the state by man-made ditch, flushing system,
or other similar man-made devices?
6. floes the animal waste management at this
farm adhere to Best Management Practices
( BNP) of the approved CTIFICGITIQN?
9. Does animal waste lagoon have sufficient P"'A
freeboard? tow much? (Approximately 3,5 )
S. Is the general condition of this CAFO facility,
including management and operation,
satisfactory?
SRCTION IV
Comments
1wfPScY�� 3� 4%4_%CY R*Vz" ! 8.1c, , 4Wta
021 PO4
Y
0