770004_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
September 20, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr.William Bruton
P.O. Box 744
Mount Gilead, NC 28306
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Bill Bruton Farm
Facility No. 77 - 4
Richmond County
Dear Mr. Bruton:
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
On September 18, 2002, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality, conducted
an inspection of the Bill Bruton Farm in Richmond County. The inspection revealed that the fescue grass crop in the
waste application field had a substantial problem with weed competition and had a poor to non-existent stand. Also,
the bermuda grass field had a problem with weeds and grass competition. In addition, weekly freeboard records were
not being.maintained as required.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following items be addressed:
The bermuda grass waste application field need a chemical application to remove the grass competition
(crabgrass) to prevent loss of crop. The fescue waste application field will need to replanted this fall due to
loss of stand. Contact an agronomist for assistance with appropriate chemical recommendations.
2. Maintain lagoon freeboard records weekly in accordance with your General Permit requirements.
RFHI rh
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Robert F. Heath
Environmental Specialist
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street — Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043
Phone: [phone]IFAX: 910-486-0707k Internet: wy_%cm.state.nc,us/ENR
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer -- 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

t 1p
Division of Water Quality
Facility Number 7 O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access�
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 00.5V /%q Departure Time: County: Nbn� Region: O"—""per
Farm Name: / 1�(� f ftkM Owner Email:
Owner Name: / VQA� cT' u.d Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: n f /�.,,
Facility Contact: / A `J"ti+'�� Title:
l/
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
0
Phone No:
Integrator: PLG.,V `ill
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = c = A Longitude: = o = ,
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
I1 ❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ TurkeyPoults
❑ Other
Discharses & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
I
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes �] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
19 NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
F] NA
❑ NE
P NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
E,9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
j
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 lsefture� Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: COn
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
32
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No X NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the inte it any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
1,�O No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift [I Application Outside of Area
Pesc () (Wa-2), Smn, Ctr d
g�
12. Crop type(s) p , Icy/ M Ljq , w5 �'CO't
13.
Soil type(s) U "? %
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
59 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
C& No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
64No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
AL
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur . Date:
Page 2 of 3 112128104 Continued

a �
Facility Number: rj? — Date of Inspection 4 7
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ED No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists El Design El Maps [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑Yes
No
ElNA
ElNE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
ElYes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
10 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
91 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
V] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Facility Number p
WDivision of Water Quality,'
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency � I III we {
Type of Visit 4VCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 4rCutine 0 Complaint p Follow up p Referral p Emergency p Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: I ���II/ Arrival Time:®® Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: Q
IV PJR�C ,,�((��rM-//n��%!lUA-6,,,ry; ja. Owner Email:
Owner Name: !,1 Q�C 4 Phone:
Mailing Address: (7 Y / Y u's44cv� ���LL_r1[� � X 33
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 1LC Q j'I Title: LJ Phone No:
Onsite Representative: 'v 0a GAae� Integrator: _RLrV I '-5
Certified Operator: / V 0j ClAa-z/u Operator Certification Number: rl Lq.
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = i = « Longitude: = ° = i = «
MC_ rl3 �4. U (e.r'.A-e IZ4 OVA -hrU�tl J&4 (� � �r�'1 CJ Ur CA)
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
I I ❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Pouets
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Co
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No �.RIA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No J'NA
❑ NE
1
❑ Yes ❑ No_,dVA
❑ NE
❑ Yes EdNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes-6 No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Q 0 Date of Inspection f l /
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
f1 r�
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes XNo
El NA ❑ NE
El Yes No El NA El NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ,07No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes )I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [l No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs [:]Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) F'2.SCLLt 4`C A,rrr aufa lgaj- 0 mylod
u U
13. Soil type(s) U (� �-j� ,e-
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 'ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes 'K No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ,KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes f�allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other commas.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
-V f p• pe3 Q4L /Z64 -P16). 5 /.7-�v �o h-;f' a-..
U,2 Jv/f 'f'o ICGC/ C (/V�• C.Q� ��n 1 S � YG� ���� � t ff'��%'r�
Reviewer/Inspector Name L' 441zOA J Phone: 9 / O y 3 33�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: A6t-L_2L , to
Page 2 of 3

Facility Number: 9 rl — Date of Inspection
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check El Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists
❑ Design El Maps ❑Other ,
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes )%No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather
Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ YesNo
❑ NA
El NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
El Yes �RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
L*E
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
�JNE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes h No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes 19 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
JNo
❑ NA [I NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
%No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
J�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
U'7 , ►3r�s t-, rn(AA 6e c Qavt ems(
i � 0
0 Lutg-f -�a Se�S{. c�pt� -�o ►� t�Q LA-) 44 ") t o ✓ .
T 2 /Ylc I&:C e-d -(o irn `�o 6t 55�51 -A -e COC'
�-_ �I7
p-c,ss�� , ,-, fI -� A �cu,-ier new- 414 Sla S Ur
cp
/1 rteO
_sko Plan. O tuner � ah &,l) c1f�
12128104

CACAU
eb (nktp
FacilityNumber l 1 Date � �j ��o Time IN�:
" Out.
Owner
Farm Name
Von./rn
O.I.0 /Uo No. 1-?%`t-
C.O.C. General = — NPDS
Design Current Design Current
Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder
sederL in SACS g? Farrow to Wean
Farrow to eeder Farrow to Finish
Gilts Boars
Other
Soil types
,1 lta�Li�
Crop Types Pan Window
CPAIJIAP
9�
Soil Test Plat19 IS'
Designed Freeboard
Rain gauge �ain breaker
VII
Observed Freeboard p
Daily Rainfall Waste Transfers
6,130
Calibration of spray equipment G.P.M.
Sludge Survey Crop Yield 120 Minute inspections
1 in. Rain inspections +' Weather code Weekly Freeboard
ate— Pumping time �� Z
0
Waste Analysis % & Month ViTo
2 ?
Comments

Type of Visit • Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notffication 4POther ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 1 0 O Time:
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted Q Certified(( 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .....__........__.
Farm Name: .._. _ 1.�lYlrg� ......!!!�!�.l�htk!'�._. .l��!!........._. County: _._..� w ._ .._....___... .
Owner Name:
PhoneNo: _._...._...._..__....__ .. .................... ...............
_._._ .
MailingAddress: ....._...._...._...._.......... ...._...._ ... _......._._._.__. ..._........._. _ _ __ ._._._._ _ . ...._ _ ...... ........__ . _
Facility Contact: __..._....__._._..... .... _...._...____....._._ Title: ...................... ....... Phone No:
Onsite Representative:.._._._._.__.__.. _.... ._ __.___ _._._._..............__._ .. Integrator: ___._......._ _ .......__. ......._ .. _.._..._..._....
Certified Operator.._......._._.__...._....__._.._ ...
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number.....„., ....,„., ......., ___.
❑ swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude f 4( Longitude • 4 44
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Ca P4 lion ;TewttyCapacity Population Castle C;apacitv Population
Wean to Feeder Layer Dairy
Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder Other
Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity-
Gilts
Boars Total ,%LW
Number otiagootos L
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: __...._.....� ......_ .. _ ....... __ ....._. _....._ ._.... ___ _ ...._....___._._ ....._ ___...._. _..... __ ..__._._ . __.._.
Freeboard (inches): 3�
12112103 q ,� 4 J _`� Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ❑ No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ❑ No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/unprovement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.

I IV
v of aou ano water % vnservauen
:�'; O Utter Ageacy.
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
{ Facility Number Date of Visit: n Time: 00
tIONotOverational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditional).. Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold
Farm Name: vw GC wwiams rary, County: 12 . t.i...vi,&
Owner Name: Ind i c kad (AA 1 j,s,i.m s Phone No: q/ 0 /1. 5z •- _3 HtI
Mailing Address: Fl. 1? t3 n9 646 N I (efjz� 111' C.
Facility Contact: _: ojc% { lr^.S Title: Phone No:
OnsiteRepresentative: _-rnL h 13:11"61-nS Integrator:
Certified Operator: i'A i Chu. e Q lid � Il t Gam, Operator Certification Number: 334
Location of Farm:
-9 Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 6 0" Longitude • 1 K
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder P Laver I I I[[:] Da'
® Feeder to Finish a ❑ Non -Laver I I I[] Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons I 1 I ILI Subsurface Drains Present JILJ Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps I JE3 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: 4-04
Freeboard (inches): .'S ! 'd-
❑ Yes (LNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes E3 No
❑ Yes %No
❑ Yes U No
Structure 6
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 4± — Date of Inspection O O
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes (ANo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes I] No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes (2 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes] No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [2�No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes No
12. Crop type a er i, �_ A , -i - : C C C i,.o
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes [] No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes KI No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes JB No
Reouired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes U No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes (KNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 2LNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [6No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes CgNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes K No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes � No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
t`e cry c-db 16,50-0- , ¢ Fr r�
1
(� rl ✓1ll�l� Sod d P L AG_
Reviewer/Inspector Namei
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Date: 10j? 6':z
05103101 Continued

Facility Number:— Date of Inspection d
Odor I es
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
05103101
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes �R No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No

Facility• lumber i fi� Date of Visit: O Time: 3
� fi
10 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted ■ Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm ?dame: —_64,. C. -1ael W. itCGw►S PGu-uvv Count•: 12���rnonc% f�r2c
Owner Name: ��A i cl, G. 1. Q 1, W i l L a r-As Phone No: Ci i b
Mailing Address: __P. 6 , a Ok i. 4L l-L I lc,�
Facility Contact: '1 0 LJ' u"l`Title: Phone No:
OnsiteRepresentative: ►\V CL.Ge1? Integrator: R"Py;S
Certified Operator: , CJ,,.0 eA I.i; 1,1i G wtS Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
2 Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 06 ` Longitude • 1 OK
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponulatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
o
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farroa- to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver I I I ID Da'
❑ Non -Layer I I I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 1 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JEJ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharses & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ] No
Dischar_e originated at: ❑ Laeoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? El Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes RNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes P No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes �a`No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes] No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes PNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
1P No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
U No
Waste A.nnlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
[� No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
[RNo
12. Crop type AP.l-muc_ - -
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
[qNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
P No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
qNo
Reauired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[I No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
F1 No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
CD No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
� No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
[5� No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
p No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.

Facility Number: — 5 Date of Inspection `- V---V y
or Ln=
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes W No
Cl Yes [@ No
❑ Yes Q9 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
05103101

F
Facility Number Date of visit: OZ Time:rO : 6O
t
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
■ Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conn/ditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ^C/ .'e/ Gt/',��/;"y /L�4,2r` County: /C�C��'+o•✓�
Owner Name: //,7,r.�i A/ 4/0iPhone
No: L°IIO)
Mailing Address: /0• �oXI NC, ?
Facility Contact: dAA1 Zz/`Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: �/�r/J�_N/.vy /�i�l�e�+�. Integrator• fY•
Certified Operator: '4 6eoo G,//r�/�L Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' �I OK Longitude • •
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Catty Po ulation Poultry Capaci-tv Po ulation Cattle Capacity Po elation
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer Fo
Dai
�F
Feeder to Finish � ❑ Non -Layer Non-Dai
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total'SSLW r
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 S rav Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
Structure 5
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes J�INo
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes (�No
El Yes , `No
Structure 6
05103101
Continued

Facility Number: % —
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? „ ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Do acility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ P, checklists, design, maps etc.)
19. Does record k4pingis�need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboar waste analysis oil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes C No
❑ Yes 9'No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes RrNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes 2�_No
XYes ❑ No
❑ Yes Rio
❑ Yes lXNo
&Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes )KNo
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes RNo
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (tw additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Conv ❑ Final
/Notes
op
41,17
oe
COI �fi.4 .Tilt Ale r �.E �ou Gt�tt1� S /•�f
,
6vilY. e
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: / a2
05103101 Continued

Facility Dumber: '71 — ,S Date of inspection D�
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below NrYes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes [No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 9No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters. etc.) ❑ Yes O No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? El Yes 9No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes RiNo
O5103101

of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit q_Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date or Visit: — . =L) Time:
Facility Number
Not Operational Q Below Threshold
#Permitted [3 Certified Q Conditionall Certified Q Registered Date Last Operated or Above Thres old :.........................
Farm Name: ,/..�/..1.5 �.�.�:y ......./.....G .1. 'I 7<i.. ..../.��` <� 1 County: / ! CIA-
.............................................
az� �.......................
Owner Name: rC ltli •l Ct� i4 �i2S Phone No 5,,,2„',,J�,%.
1.............:.................................................................................................................................
Facility Contact: © i1 r ,,,,,Title ................. Phone No: .......
..................................................................... .......................................................................
Mailing Address: ..... ,%OL1.../.1.G ......I........................................................................... lL.. �'f�.r' / ........................... �.Q.....
�r/..n........ .. O
Onsite Representative:.........': ;.,/ I. �� /"--............................................................... Integrator:......,...1.4.0, L/..,s
Certified Operator:.. !,(.C........ .......... ...((A (.� r..(�2 ..................... Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �� �« Longitude �• �� �«
Design Current
G
Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
FE]I D iry
Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons Z ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impact
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes O No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
01/01/01 Continued

Facility Number: 7" — G'S.._
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes KNo
Structure 1 3uc ture 2 Structure. 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Pr'ccif'r�
......... .. ............`.................................................................................................................................................
....................
Freeboard(inches): ........... .✓............................ 0�.610..........................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, [:]Yes Q�No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes WNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes &rNO
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ONO
12. Crop type •��� .�. �=' c�rx S �L
13. Do the receiving crops differ 4th those designated in t e ertified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes NJ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ONO
1 _ — ary? Lknetiv -, r-, ,.To
❑ Required Records &Documents On -site ❑ Off -site
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes RNo
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes 09,No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes No
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes gNo
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes C�No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes M�No
01/01/01 Continued

./ l
Facility Number:
Date of Inspection j
Printed on: 1/4/2001
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes �&o
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: $ Date:
01/01/01

W Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection 711-07
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted 13 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered JE3 Not :0:erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Mt�S!/LGti2� LN.�..1�1..Q'-1.5......! �i.r................... County• rGh4?.�X............
Owner Name:
.....%�.t.G. A.�:...................... .���,'..Cstrot,.5............................... Phone No: S 7
Facility Contact: (�-1. . e.......................................... Title: .................... Phone No: ......
...................................................... ...........................................
MailingAddress:.......... Q.... ......... ... r�?.................................................................... ............ � e Z 5
(�y......f�/%...................................................
Onsite Representative: ........... ok yi.ef..................................................................... Integrator:................y..4CC//zli..............................................
Certified Operator:..M.��, {�?./ .............. ... l(%,,.vj1 am&,j; .................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ' ' " Longitude ' ' "
Design Current Design Current Design Current
$wine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer I
Ej [I Dairy
eeder to Finish 10 Non -Layer I Non -Dairy
❑ arrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars - Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps i ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: 0
Freeboard (inches): .... g.y.9...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes
)�No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes ZZI No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 0 No
Structure 6
................................
❑ Yes R90
Continued on back

r
s
Facility Number: 77 —dam`
Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
gNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
P(No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
P(110
11. Is there evidence of over applicatio ? ❑ Exces ive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
XNo
12. Crop type BSC u e i P
13. Do the receiving crops diffe ith those desi ated in a (rtified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
PNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Mio
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
ONO
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
E(No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
)No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
RNo
Required Records & Documents
IT. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
E�No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
g'No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
gNo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
ONO
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
XNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ONO
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ANo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes �No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes EJ�No
o •yiolaiioiis'or of ficiencies •were hbfea• d(Wing this 'visit.* • :Y:oo wiii-teceiye ijo fut ftf
'coriespo dence: aboutt: this visit:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: IL k, Date: 4 ,f —ey

Facility Number: 7 7 — r Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes o
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ YesNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes o
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes �;_o
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

14P Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Fa ility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
rermitted 0 Certified Q Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 0 Not Operations, Date Last Operated:
..........................
Farm Name:......................i.cr.!4!.E%I.........Y............Wi.1.l.!.gm.S County' ,i.!.C�...�CXar�2 ...
4... .
Owner Name:............ �... /'� �t�, / W i a ................ Phone No:.......... / /� — G % — L ✓�!`-O
'......................... �F/Y4. .............(......................,.............................................
Facility Contact: ..............40hk l.............! !.J i(.!lk.*V 5.. Title:................................................................ Phone No:..................................... ..............
Mailing Address: 5f /�L /� C pi .3c3
w....M.................................................... ,�.. e,...N............................................��.......$'
Q
Onsite Representative:........ 7.a-A W.► t Integrator: / 2Nt
Certified Operator:.........6.&.ell..... 1 l cy✓vi Operator Certification Number;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ........................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 6 Longitude • 6 «
Design Current
O vnuc
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
EIDairy
Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity 3553
Total SSLW
,Number of Lagoons ® ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps I0 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ElLagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structuret Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ................... ......................................................................................................... ..................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes KNo
fj/ 4-
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes ffNo,
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes KNO
Structure 6
...............................
❑ Yes No
Continued on aek

24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
:iolations or• deficiencies •were ngfed• during Ois'visit: • Y64 wiil•rebO*4e dd further - : -
correspondence. ahouti this visit.: • • • . • • .
r .t if, 5
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly(Addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? ❑Yes �No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? A, Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes OKNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes [VNo
Waste Application A4 ; 6.- , rS 4j� �/
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? fa g�wn��,S Yes %No
11. Is there evidence of over application? Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑yesiNo
12. Crop type 4L.. 0 . /h�li.(1�[if _ /hi..�_
13. Do the receiving cops differ with those designated in tlltl' Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? Yes W"TA-
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? a5 �� 3 �, 1 [Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? '- _ - / C ❑ Yes 3s10
W.
Required Records & Documents Mr. W;AVIV 57 s� � io cri
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Genera` 1 Permit readily available?imp b e�
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan r adily available.,
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) rt o l
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes T No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes jo No
❑ Yes �C No
1% s ,j]a` No
Comments (refer to question .. Eitplain suy ifF Owers attcltor any recommendatiaw or any outer coa teieints.
Use drawings of facility to Better explain situation"s {use aclditioinal pages as necessary).
❑ Yes ;0 No-�Q�
Yes No
ft'
❑ Yes KrNo
tib F Lo - o�,�►-►� _ a�,►, {�,�o AAI�� Jam., - , Free -,PkrX,,-
A.
s� :yt tM sor►�
12 If,� - be V W
Reviewer/Inspector Namer'��--,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /�� aAl Date:
3/23/99

i -F4L
Division of Soil and Water Conservation [3Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
lWoutine 0 Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-uD of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection Time of Inspection U= 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered ACertified [3 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Namc:...1?t� W......r.�l.�..4� trl 5.......,e rAl ...... County:...... �.5!4 N Oil ........................................
. . ........ ............ ................
Owner Name:.....Aji.a....................Y..... S/`�.� �` W� 5............................................................
�4 ..4 . Phone No :........... .........Z....... �...... !
Facility Contact: cl� . ....L.rl,l.rl L..f�.t„an. ................. Title: ... .��.....W....:-Sn V-..........bc­
Phone No:
Mailing Address:A ..........:�'�..9.....�..........................................................'1��............. �/�.................. 2�33$
Onsite Representative:.. Sh� .......4..1..../.....r...�...r..l....�ik$ Integrator:...................S.............I..................
Certified Operator:.. ..:.`....................................................................................... Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ' 6 ff Longitude ' =' = ff
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer I I I0 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I ILI Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity C
Total SSLW r
ign Current
icity Population
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds :�� ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes [�No
maintenance/improvement? ' r
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes X No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes WNo
rT
7/25/97 Continued on back

. 44i.
Facility Number: 7 7— Q �/
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? ❑ Yes 10
Structures (LaLOons.110ldinLy Ponds. Flush Pits. etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes A No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft):...........2...........................................
................ ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes �Nl 0
It. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes `o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes "I No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses \
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'? ❑ Yes XNo
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes XNo
(If in excess of JWMP, or runoff ennttenng�wa ea.f
he State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...... 4Fiesl�u..e.........1.'.4...((.//.((//.. tKgnated
...................................................................................................................................................
i
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those des in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes 9No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes XNo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ko
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative`? ❑ Yes rMNo
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes [KNo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes JeNo
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 4No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further
correspondence about this.visit.
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: , Date: 2 7

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN T REQUESTED
Michael i iams
Michael Williams Farm
549 W Hwy 73
Ellerbe NC 28338
Farm Number: 77 - 5
Dear Michael B. Williams:
June 23, 1998
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NAwuRAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Michael Williams Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC,
must apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter,
your farm has six60 days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 676 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call at [phone] extension or
Jeffery Brown with the Fayetteville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
-Ar A. P eston oward, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Fayetteville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

cc: Compliance Group
Central Files
Trent Allen - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Vilma Mendez-Colombani - Richmond County NRCS
Kraig Westerbeek - Murphy - Brown